From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 7 01:02:37 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA05674 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 Jul 1996 01:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from diablo.ppp.de (diablo.ppp.de [193.141.101.34]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA05668 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 1996 01:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from allegro.lemis.de by diablo.ppp.de with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0ucon6-000QefC; Sun, 7 Jul 96 10:02 MET DST From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Organisation: LEMIS, Schellnhausen 2, 36325 Feldatal, Germany Phone: +49-6637-919123 Fax: +49-6637-919122 Received: (grog@localhost) by allegro.lemis.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id JAA15222; Sun, 7 Jul 1996 09:42:36 +0200 Message-Id: <199607070742.JAA15222@allegro.lemis.de> Subject: Re: gcc lies? To: michaelh@cet.co.jp (Michael Hancock) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 09:42:36 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers) In-Reply-To: from "Michael Hancock" at Jul 6, 96 11:18:25 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Michael Hancock writes: > > This is probably why BSDI uses gcc 1.x for the kernel and gives their > screaming customers 2.7.2. Hey, you're right, even BSD/OS 2.1 still uses gcc 1.42. You'd think they would have got their act together by now. But I remember the background: there was something to do with kernel structures being aligned differently under gcc 2.x. You'd think they would have it fixed by now, though. Greg