From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 00:10:04 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA01503 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 00:10:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA01497; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612080810.AAA01497@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, system@mail.lightside.net Received: from mail.lightside.com (mail.lightside.com [207.67.176.14]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id AAA01371 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 00:01:58 -0800 (PST) Received: (from system@localhost) by mail.lightside.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA17312; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 00:01:52 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612080801.AAA17312@mail.lightside.com> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 00:01:52 -0800 (PST) From: system@mail.lightside.net Reply-To: system@mail.lightside.net To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2173: top port Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2173 >Category: ports >Synopsis: top does not compile under FBSD 2.1.6 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Dec 8 00:10:01 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: System Manager >Organization: Lightside, Inc. >Release: FreeBSD 2.1.6-RELEASE i386 >Environment: FreeBSD 2.1.6.1, created by updating from 2.1.5 >Description: top does not compile. Here is a transcript: Checksums OK. ===> Extracting for top-3.3 ===> Patching for top-3.3 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for top-3.3 ===> Configuring for top-3.3 cp /usr/ports/sysutils/top/files/defaults /usr/ports/sysutils/top/work/.defaults cp /usr/ports/sysutils/top/files/m_freebsd2.* /usr/ports/sysutils/top/work/machine Reading configuration from last time... Using these settings: Bourne Shell /bin/sh C compiler cc Compiler options -DHAVE_GETOPT -O Awk command awk Install command ./install Module freebsd2 LoadMax 5.0 Default TOPN -1 Nominal TOPN 18 Default Delay 2 Random passwd access yes Table Size 47 Owner root Group Owner kmem Mode 2755 bin directory $(PREFIX)/bin man directory $(PREFIX)/man/man1 man extension 1 man style man Building Makefile... Building top.local.h... Building top.1... Doing a "make clean". rm -f *.o top core core.* sigdesc.h To create the executable, type "make". ===> Building for top-3.3 cc -DHAVE_GETOPT -O -c top.c awk -f sigconv.awk /usr/include/sys/signal.h >sigdesc.h cc -DHAVE_GETOPT -O -c commands.c cc -DHAVE_GETOPT -O -c display.c cc -DHAVE_GETOPT -O -c screen.c cc -DHAVE_GETOPT -O -c username.c cc -DHAVE_GETOPT -O -c utils.c cc -DHAVE_GETOPT -O -c version.c cc -DHAVE_GETOPT -O -c getopt.c cc -DHAVE_GETOPT -O -c machine.c machine.c: In function `swapmode': machine.c:793: storage size of `swaplist' isn't known *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. >How-To-Repeat: cd /usr/ports/sysutils/top make >Fix: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 07:18:51 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA14219 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 07:18:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA14214 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 07:18:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) with UUCP id QAA02927 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 16:15:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.4/8.8.2) with ESMTP id QAA03899 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 16:11:41 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199612081511.QAA03899@klemm.gtn.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 16:11:41 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Sorry if there should have been a discussion about that, one of the last crashes removed me from nearly all mailing lists for 2 weeks. -- andreas@klemm.gtn.com /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ Support Unix -- andreas.klemm@wup.de pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<< From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 08:11:43 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA15578 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 08:11:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from solar.tlk.com (root@solar.tlk.com [194.97.84.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id IAA15552 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 08:11:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by solar.tlk.com id ; Sun, 8 Dec 96 17:11 MET Message-Id: From: torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum) Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? In-Reply-To: <199612081511.QAA03899@klemm.gtn.com> from Andreas Klemm at "Dec 8, 96 04:11:41 pm" To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 17:11:27 +0100 (MET) Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL26 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Andreas Klemm wrote: > Sorry if there should have been a discussion about that, one of the last > crashes removed me from nearly all mailing lists for 2 weeks. I would do that, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to upgrade it before the 2.2-RELEASE is out. Comments ? -tb From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 12:03:07 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA22041 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 12:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id MAA22036 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 12:03:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) with UUCP id VAA03331; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 21:00:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.4/8.8.2) with ESMTP id SAA17856; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 18:25:19 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199612081725.SAA17856@klemm.gtn.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum) cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 08 Dec 1996 17:11:27 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 18:25:18 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > Sorry if there should have been a discussion about that, one of the last > > crashes removed me from nearly all mailing lists for 2 weeks. > > I would do that, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to upgrade it > before the 2.2-RELEASE is out. > > Comments ? I think the inn ports should move this way: inn -> inn-1.5 inn-current -> inn-unoff4 So people have a stable hacked up inn rel 1.4-unoff4 and the new inn to make experiments with it. Andreas /// -- andreas@klemm.gtn.com /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ Support Unix -- andreas.klemm@wup.de pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<< From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 12:31:05 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA22848 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 12:31:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from solar.tlk.com (root@solar.tlk.com [194.97.84.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id MAA22835 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 12:30:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by solar.tlk.com id ; Sun, 8 Dec 96 21:30 MET Message-Id: From: torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum) Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? In-Reply-To: <199612081725.SAA17856@klemm.gtn.com> from Andreas Klemm at "Dec 8, 96 06:25:18 pm" To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 21:30:47 +0100 (MET) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: torstenb@pegasus.tlk.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL26 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > Sorry if there should have been a discussion about that, one of the last > > > crashes removed me from nearly all mailing lists for 2 weeks. > > > > I would do that, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to upgrade it > > before the 2.2-RELEASE is out. > > > > Comments ? > > I think the inn ports should move this way: > > inn -> inn-1.5 > inn-current -> inn-unoff4 > > So people have a stable hacked up inn rel 1.4-unoff4 and the new inn > to make experiments with it. I fully agree, but the question is: should we really upgrade the inn port before 2.2-RELEASE is out ? inn 1.5 is pretty new. It may have new bugs and so on. -tb From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 14:21:34 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA26751 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 14:21:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA26746 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 14:21:30 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) with UUCP id XAA18602; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:15:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.4/8.8.2) with ESMTP id XAA04150 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:05:09 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199612082205.XAA04150@klemm.gtn.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0alpha 12/3/96 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: torstenb@pegasus.tlk.com Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 08 Dec 1996 21:30:47 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 23:05:09 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > > > Sorry if there should have been a discussion about that, one of the last > > > > crashes removed me from nearly all mailing lists for 2 weeks. > > > > > > I would do that, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to upgrade it > > > before the 2.2-RELEASE is out. > > > > > > Comments ? > > > > I think the inn ports should move this way: > > > > inn -> inn-1.5 > > inn-current -> inn-unoff4 > > > > So people have a stable hacked up inn rel 1.4-unoff4 and the new inn > > to make experiments with it. > > I fully agree, but the question is: should we really upgrade the inn port > before 2.2-RELEASE is out ? > inn 1.5 is pretty new. It may have new bugs and so on. I personally see it that way: inn-unoff4 is the _stable_ inn version everybody uses. And now inn-1.5 is the _current_ version. So for everybody a version is out ... As long as there is no code freeze for the ports collection, I'd like to see inn-1.5 in the ports collection. Andreas /// -- andreas@klemm.gtn.com /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ Support Unix -- andreas.klemm@wup.de pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<< From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 14:31:36 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA27474 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 14:31:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (root@mexico.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA27459 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 14:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA09894 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:31:23 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id XAA17486 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:31:20 +0100 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.4/keltia-uucp-2.9) id XAA06512; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:14:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:14:04 +0100 From: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? References: <199612081725.SAA17856@klemm.gtn.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.53 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#2768 In-Reply-To: ; from Torsten Blum on Dec 8, 1996 21:30:47 +0100 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Torsten Blum: > I fully agree, but the question is: should we really upgrade the inn port > before 2.2-RELEASE is out ? > inn 1.5 is pretty new. It may have new bugs and so on. Even old bugs. See the two patches at ftp.vix.com. James will issue 1.5.1 very soon. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #31: Tue Dec 3 23:52:58 CET 1996 From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 15:04:17 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA28688 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 15:04:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.7]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id PAA28675; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 15:04:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca8-23.ix.netcom.com [207.93.141.151]) by dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA21171; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 15:03:36 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id PAA06894; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 15:03:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 15:03:32 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612082303.PAA06894@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: committers@freebsd.org CC: ports@freebsd.org Subject: freeze postponed another week.... From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Well, midnight came and went rather uneventfully, still with no BETA in sight. Thus, the freeze of the ports tree is postponed another week, until midnight 12/14 (that is, the midnight between Saturday and Sunday in U.S. Pacific time, GMT-0800). Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 17:01:51 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA04835 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 17:01:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA04830 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 17:01:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca8-23.ix.netcom.com [207.93.141.151]) by dfw-ix10.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA14765; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 17:01:07 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id RAA09779; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 17:01:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 17:01:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612090101.RAA09779@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr CC: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Even old bugs. See the two patches at ftp.vix.com. James will issue 1.5.1 * very soon. Whatever. Just import it as inn15. (We can upgrade it to 1.5.1 if it comes out before our release.) Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 17:42:53 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA06754 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 17:42:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite.sentex.ca [199.212.134.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id RAA06749 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 17:42:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from sand ([206.222.77.6]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA29379 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 20:45:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19961208203643.009389d0@sentex.net> X-Sender: mdtancsa@sentex.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 20:36:44 -0500 To: ports@FreeBSD.org From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 09:30 PM 12/08/96 +0100, Torsten Blum wrote: >Andreas Klemm wrote: > >> > > Sorry if there should have been a discussion about that, one of the last >> > > crashes removed me from nearly all mailing lists for 2 weeks. >> I think the inn ports should move this way: >> >> inn -> inn-1.5 >> inn-current -> inn-unoff4 >> >> So people have a stable hacked up inn rel 1.4-unoff4 and the new inn >> to make experiments with it. > >I fully agree, but the question is: should we really upgrade the inn port >before 2.2-RELEASE is out ? >inn 1.5 is pretty new. It may have new bugs and so on. I know there is already a patch out to it for an obscure security bug. Below is the announcement I got for those not on the mailling list. ---Mike ----------------------------------------------------------- X-btw: vix.com is also gw.home.vix.com and vixie.sf.ca.us From: brister@vix.com (James A. Brister) To: inn-announce@vix.com Subject: ANNOUNCE: INN security patches Organization: Internet Software Consortium Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 22:12:05 +0100 Sender: owner-inn-announce@vix.com As Matt Power pointed out a little while ago, there is a obscure security problem with all current versions of INN. The patch he supplied was correct and if you still have it, you should apply it (asusming you use 1.4unoff3, 1.4unoff4 or 1.5). If you don't have the patch any more, you can go to: ftp://ftp.vix.com/pub/inn/patches or http://www.isc.org/isc/inn.html to get it, where you'll also find a patch for version 1.4sec, for the same problem (but I recommend upgrading if you're still back at that version). Thanks James -- James Brister brister@vix.com Internet Software Consortium http://www.isc.org/isc inn@isc.org ------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 20:04:48 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id UAA21692 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 20:04:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id UAA21676; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 20:04:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA06952; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 20:04:42 -0800 (PST) To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) cc: committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeze postponed another week.... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 08 Dec 1996 15:03:32 PST." <199612082303.PAA06894@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 20:04:42 -0800 Message-ID: <6949.850104282@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Well, midnight came and went rather uneventfully, still with no BETA > in sight. Thus, the freeze of the ports tree is postponed another I think you're working from old information (or haven't been reading your core mail :-) - we're still waiting for Justin to ring in around the 10th with the results of his SCSI testing, remember? Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 21:40:09 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA03194 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 21:40:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA03162; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 21:40:06 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 21:40:06 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612090540.VAA03162@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, mi@aldan.ziplink.net Received: from rtfm.ziplink.net ([199.232.255.52]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA01988 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 21:33:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mi@localhost) by rtfm.ziplink.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA01510; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:31:24 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199612090531.AAA01510@rtfm.ziplink.net> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:31:24 -0500 (EST) From: mi@aldan.ziplink.net Reply-To: mi@aldan.ziplink.net To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2182: FreeBSD, XFree86-3.2, locales; russian/X.language Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2182 >Category: ports >Synopsis: FreeBSD's and X-32's list of locales do not match >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Dec 8 21:40:04 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: Mikhail Teterin >Organization: >Release: FreeBSD 2.2-960801-SNAP i386 >Environment: >Description: XFree86 has a list of locales, including ru_RU.KOI8-R. FreeBSD's correspondent is ru_SU.KOI8-R (I am sure there are other mismatches). Nope, applying Alex Chernov's port from russian/X.language does not help. IMHO the port is seriously broken. It does not install all the files listed in pkg/PLIST and after applying it there is no ${X11ROOT}/lib/X11/locale/locale.alias, for example. Only locale.alias.bak. Whatever it installs goes into misterious X11/nls , X11/locale becomes unusable. I do not think there is a need for the port at all, because XFree86 is supposed to handle displaying cyrillics on its own. I am sure, however, the port will be usefull for _entering_ koi-characters (currently, xterm beeps on my attempts to type them). IMO, the port of XFree86-3.2 (thanks, Jean-Marc) has to be fixed to make sure ALL of the FreeBSD's locales have correctly corresponding X-locales. Here is my list (after I added the ru_SU.KOI8-R manually): mi@rtfm:/usr/share/locale (1009) foreach l ( `\ls` ) foreach? (grep -q $l /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/locale.alias || \ grep -q $l /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/locale.dir ) || \ echo $l not present foreach? end lt_LN.ASCII not present lt_LN.ISO_8859-1 not present ru_SU.CP866 not present us-ascii not present >How-To-Repeat: Install XFree86-3.2. setenv LANG ru_SU.KOI8-R; xterm xterm will come up with no title. (I posted to Usenet about this too, recently). If you install the current X.language port xterm will not come up at all (as well as half of other X-programs). >Fix: Add ru_SU.KOI8-R to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/locale.* manually for displaying. See what Alex has to say about typing. Another work-around is to admit that Russia is the same as Soviet Union (question of one's beliefs) and ``setenv LANG ru_RU.KOI8-R''. >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 23:48:23 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA14490 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:48:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id XAA14485; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:48:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca9-06.ix.netcom.com [204.31.231.102]) by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA20880; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:47:48 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id XAA11605; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:47:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:47:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612090747.XAA11605@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <6949.850104282@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: freeze postponed another week.... From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * I think you're working from old information (or haven't been reading * your core mail :-) - we're still waiting for Justin to ring in around * the 10th with the results of his SCSI testing, remember? I know. What I didn't know if I was supposed to announce the core discussion into the public. :) Satoshi P.S. It was ME that started the most recent discussion on the 2.2-BETA schedule, c'mon Jordan I'm not THAT stupid. ;) From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 00:15:16 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA16390 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mpp@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA16241; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:13:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:13:57 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Pritchard Message-Id: <199612090813.AAA16241@freefall.freebsd.org> To: Nakai@Mlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp, mpp, freebsd-ports Subject: Re: ports/2101 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Synopsis: New port: VGBZoom State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: mpp State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 9 00:13:39 PST 1996 State-Changed-Why: Duplicate of PR 2100. From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 00:26:45 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA17413 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id AAA17406; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:26:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA03186; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:26:42 -0800 (PST) To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) cc: committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeze postponed another week.... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 08 Dec 1996 23:47:46 PST." <199612090747.XAA11605@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 00:26:41 -0800 Message-ID: <3183.850120001@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > * I think you're working from old information (or haven't been reading > * your core mail :-) - we're still waiting for Justin to ring in around > * the 10th with the results of his SCSI testing, remember? > > I know. What I didn't know if I was supposed to announce the core > discussion into the public. :) > > Satoshi > > P.S. It was ME that started the most recent discussion on the 2.2-BETA > schedule, c'mon Jordan I'm not THAT stupid. ;) Well, don't kill me, I just couldn't figure out why you'd be extending the freeze by another week if you knew that the real date we're waiting for (the 10th) is just the day after tomorrow. Given that, I'd think that a more reasonable ports freeze date would be no later than the 11th. Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 00:54:48 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA20294 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:54:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.12]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id AAA20287; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:54:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca9-06.ix.netcom.com [204.31.231.102]) by dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id AAA15199; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:54:13 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id AAA11806; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:54:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 00:54:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612090854.AAA11806@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <3183.850120001@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: freeze postponed another week.... From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Well, don't kill me, I just couldn't figure out why you'd be extending * the freeze by another week if you knew that the real date we're * waiting for (the 10th) is just the day after tomorrow. Given that, * I'd think that a more reasonable ports freeze date would be no later * than the 11th. I don't expect the release to immediately follow BETA, especially since this BETA is fairly different from ALPHA (and it's not only bugfixes, right?). Please correct me if I'm wrong Mr. Release Engineer. :) Since we've decided to build packages before the freeze (and I already have the whole thing built once and put up for ftp), I'm trying to aim the freeze right before the release, to reduce the amount of frustration of our venerable ports team. (This of course implies that I trust people won't upgrade ports to new buggy versions right before the release, and it seems like everyone is exercising very good judgement in this respect.) Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 01:03:27 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA21162 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA21127; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:03:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA03398; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:03:22 -0800 (PST) To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) cc: committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeze postponed another week.... In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Dec 1996 00:54:11 PST." <199612090854.AAA11806@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 01:03:22 -0800 Message-ID: <3394.850122202@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I don't expect the release to immediately follow BETA, especially > since this BETA is fairly different from ALPHA (and it's not only > bugfixes, right?). Please correct me if I'm wrong Mr. Release > Engineer. :) No, that's correct - there will be a 30 day BETA period for 2.2 Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 01:10:33 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA21617 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:10:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id BAA21612; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca9-06.ix.netcom.com [204.31.231.102]) by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id BAA28865; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:09:58 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id BAA11884; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:09:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:09:55 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612090909.BAA11884@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <3394.850122202@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: freeze postponed another week.... From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * No, that's correct - there will be a 30 day BETA period for 2.2 Oh my, 30 days? If that was discussed I missed *that* one. ;) Ok, I guess the ports freeze is going to be postponed even further. I'll make another announcement after deciding when. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 01:26:02 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA22551 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA22545; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:25:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA03520; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:25:59 -0800 (PST) To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) cc: committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeze postponed another week.... In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Dec 1996 01:09:55 PST." <199612090909.BAA11884@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 01:25:59 -0800 Message-ID: <3516.850123559@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > * No, that's correct - there will be a 30 day BETA period for 2.2 > > Oh my, 30 days? If that was discussed I missed *that* one. ;) It was never specifically labelled as such, but we kept saying things like "to be released in January" and that sort of adds up to 30 days when you really count the various factors here. :-) But in retrospect, I think that 30 days is too long and I will actually shoot for a *20* day schedule instead. If we can't do it in 20, we won't be able to do it in 30! (this is a variation on the old saying that if you can't hit your target in 10 shots, an extra 4 probably won't save your life). Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 02:25:21 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA26721 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 02:25:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from solar.tlk.com (root@solar.tlk.com [194.97.84.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id CAA26699; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 02:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by solar.tlk.com id ; Mon, 9 Dec 96 11:25 MET Message-Id: From: torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum) Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? In-Reply-To: <199612090101.RAA09779@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Dec 8, 96 05:01:04 pm" To: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 11:25:02 +0100 (MET) Cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, ports@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: torstenb@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL26 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Even old bugs. See the two patches at ftp.vix.com. James will issue 1.5.1 > * very soon. > > Whatever. Just import it as inn15. (We can upgrade it to 1.5.1 if it > comes out before our release.) ok, I'll import 1.5 as news/inn15 at the end of this week. In a few weeks we can nuke 1.4 and make 1.5 the std. port (cvs repository copy). ok ? -tb From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 02:35:00 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA27191 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 02:35:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.7]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id CAA27182; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 02:34:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca19-15.ix.netcom.com [205.187.212.47]) by dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id CAA27989; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 02:34:03 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id CAA03556; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 02:33:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 02:33:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612091033.CAA03556@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: torstenb@FreeBSD.org CC: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (torstenb@solar.tlk.com) Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * ok, I'll import 1.5 as news/inn15 at the end of this week. * In a few weeks we can nuke 1.4 and make 1.5 the std. port (cvs repository * copy). Actually, the order is backwards. Drop me a note when you're ready and I'll do the repository copy, then you can modify the second one to update it to 1.5. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 03:16:51 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA29102 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 03:16:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from max@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA29066; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 03:16:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 03:16:38 -0800 (PST) From: Masafumi NAKANE Message-Id: <199612091116.DAA29066@freefall.freebsd.org> To: rhwang@bigpanda.com, max, freebsd-ports Subject: Re: ports/1743 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Synopsis: submission of new port (tiff-3.4) State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: max State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 9 03:15:47 PST 1996 State-Changed-Why: Another PR on the same subject has been submitted. From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 03:18:24 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA29236 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 03:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from max@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA29212; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 03:18:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 03:18:13 -0800 (PST) From: Masafumi NAKANE Message-Id: <199612091118.DAA29212@freefall.freebsd.org> To: max, freebsd-ports, max Subject: Re: ports/2057 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Synopsis: Yet another port of tiff-3.4 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->max Responsible-Changed-By: max Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Dec 9 03:16:54 PST 1996 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'm looking into several submissions of tiff-3.4 port. From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 09:19:44 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA16059 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 09:19:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (root@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA16051 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 09:19:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from campa.panke.de (anonymous220.ppp.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.220]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA19881 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 18:04:09 +0100 Received: (from wosch@localhost) by campa.panke.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) id SAA00572; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 18:03:05 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 18:03:05 +0100 From: Wolfram Schneider Message-Id: <199612091703.SAA00572@campa.panke.de> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: ports changes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk http://www.cs.tu-berlin.de/~wosch/np.cgi print a list of new/updated/removed ports, based on ports/INDEX file. Wolfram From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 13:31:54 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA01877 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 13:31:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from teamos2.org (client-3.io.org [198.133.36.47]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA01872 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 13:31:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (james@localhost) by teamos2.org (8.8.3/8.8.4) with SMTP id QAA04231 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 16:31:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 16:31:49 -0500 (EST) From: James FitzGibbon X-Sender: james@teamos2.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Current status of new ports ? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Greetings, I've been out of the loop on porting for a few weeks, and just wanted to check if new imports are still allowed, or if the 2.2-release freeze had gone into effect yet. -- j. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | James FitzGibbon james@nexis.net | | Integrator, The Nexis Group Voice/Fax : 416 410-0100 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 18:41:43 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id SAA27748 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 18:41:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtigwc01.worldnet.att.net (ns.worldnet.att.net [204.127.129.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id SAA27743 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 18:41:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ldto ([207.147.240.230]) by mtigwc01.worldnet.att.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with SMTP id AAA23167 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 02:36:27 +0000 Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19961210024253.008edd38@postoffice.worldnet.att.net> X-Sender: lto@postoffice.worldnet.att.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 18:42:53 -0800 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: Long To Subject: Problem compiling x programs Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi All, I have a PC system running FreeBSD 2.1.5. I installed XFree86 3.2 recently. When I tried to make install X programs (e.g, fvwm, xsokoban,... etc.) from the ports collection. I got these error messages: ... -L /usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXExExt -lX11kb ld: -lXExExt : no match *** Error Code 1 STOP I did a search on my system. Nowhere can I find these two mysterious library files: libXExExt.*, libX11kb.* Are these files missing in the XFree86 3.2 distributions? or I have a broken installation? Thanks for any advice! VR, Long From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 19:47:30 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA03532 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.7]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id TAA03522 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:47:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca13-17.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.49]) by dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA08746; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:46:55 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id TAA22365; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:46:16 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:46:16 -0800 Message-Id: <199612100346.TAA22365@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: lto@worldnet.att.net CC: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <1.5.4.32.19961210024253.008edd38@postoffice.worldnet.att.net> (message from Long To on Mon, 09 Dec 1996 18:42:53 -0800) Subject: Re: Problem compiling x programs From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * I have a PC system running FreeBSD 2.1.5. I installed XFree86 3.2 recently. * When I tried to make install X programs (e.g, fvwm, xsokoban,... etc.) from * the ports collection. I got these error messages: * ... * -L /usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXExExt -lX11kb * ld: -lXExExt : no match * *** Error Code 1 libXExExt has gone away, and the imake config files were changed to reflect that. My guess is that your installation is incomplete and you still have old files in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 20:03:43 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id UAA05072 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.12]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA05062 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:03:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca13-17.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.49]) by dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA23760 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:03:07 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id UAA27959; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:03:05 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:03:05 -0800 Message-Id: <199612100403.UAA27959@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: bsd.port.mk support for uncompressing manpages From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk This adds a new variable MANCOMPRESSED to be defined if the man page is already compressed by the default install. If this is defined by the port, and NOMANCOMPRESS is defined by the user, the manpages are uncompressed after installation. For an example of how to use this, here's a patch to devel/cutils: === Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /ccd/tmp/cvs/ports/devel/cutils/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 Makefile --- Makefile 1996/12/08 22:57:33 1.2 +++ Makefile 1996/12/09 06:55:55 @@ -7,18 +7,15 @@ # DISTNAME= cutils-1.3.1 -PKGNAME= cutils-1.3.1 CATEGORIES= devel MASTER_SITES= ftp://freefall.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/LOCAL_PORTS/ MAINTAINER= ssigala@globalnet.it HAS_CONFIGURE= yes - -post-install: -.if defined(NOMANCOMPRESS) - @(cd ${PREFIX} ; \ - gunzip -f `grep man ${PKGDIR}/PLIST` ) -.endif +MANCOMPRESSED= yes +MAN1= cdecl.1 cundecl.1 chilight.1 cinfo.1 cinfoc.1 cinfodc.1 \ + cobfusc.1 yyextract.1 yyref.1 +MAN5= cinfodb.5 .include === In case you are wondering, this is a step towards building appropriate PLISTs depending on the value of NOMANCOMPRESS. Satoshi ------- Index: bsd.port.mk =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/share/mk/bsd.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.235 diff -u -r1.235 bsd.port.mk --- 1.235 1996/12/09 07:08:16 +++ bsd.port.mk 1996/12/10 03:48:59 @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ GZCAT?= /usr/bin/gzcat GZIP?= -9 GZIP_CMD?= /usr/bin/gzip -nf ${GZIP} +GUNZIP_CMD?= /usr/bin/gunzip -f SED?= /usr/bin/sed # Used to print all the '===>' style prompts - override this to turn them off. @@ -554,6 +555,10 @@ _MANPAGES+= ${MANN:S.^.man/${MANLANG}/mann/.} .endif +.if defined(_MANPAGES) && defined(MANCOMPRESSED) +_MANPAGES:= ${_MANPAGES:S/$/.gz/} +.endif + .MAIN: all ################################################################ @@ -972,11 +977,18 @@ X11BASE=${X11BASE} \ /bin/sh ${SCRIPTDIR}/${.TARGET:S/^real-/post-/}; \ fi -.if make(real-install) && defined(_MANPAGES) && !defined(NOMANCOMPRESS) +.if make(real-install) && defined(_MANPAGES) +.if defined(MANCOMPRESSED) && defined(NOMANCOMPRESS) + @${ECHO_MSG} "===> Uncompressing manual pages for ${PKGNAME}" +.for manpage in ${_MANPAGES} + @${GUNZIP_CMD} ${MANPREFIX}/${manpage} +.endfor +.elif !defined(MANCOMPRESSED) && !defined(NOMANCOMPRESS) @${ECHO_MSG} "===> Compressing manual pages for ${PKGNAME}" .for manpage in ${_MANPAGES} @${GZIP_CMD} ${MANPREFIX}/${manpage} .endfor +.endif .endif .if make(real-install) && !defined(NO_PKG_REGISTER) @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} ${.MAKEFLAGS} fake-pkg From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 22:16:32 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id WAA18131 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:16:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (UyKEZH3hsjxqDnFKx38NzQHEajWZSx1+@grackle.grondar.za [196.7.18.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id WAA18119; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:16:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (wRaQ/kqiLa+y+HNW1dEbLIqWzJVTbAKy@localhost.grondar.za [127.0.0.1]) by grackle.grondar.za (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA04556; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 08:16:23 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199612100616.IAA04556@grackle.grondar.za> To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) cc: mark@grondar.za, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl5 (Semi-)Broken now Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 08:16:16 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk wrote: > > I'll just back out my changes, I guess it's not a big deal if the > > PLIST is missing one file (and one of the manpages remain > > uncompressed). The package built on a system with gdbm will work on a > > system without gdbm, right? > > Actually, is it possible to build and install the GDBM_File module > without gdbm actually installed? Hmm... - I'll look at this. (Tonight only). M -- Mark Murray PGP key fingerprint = 80 36 6E 40 83 D6 8A 36 This .sig is umop ap!sdn. BC 06 EA 0E 7A F2 CE CE From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 22:33:05 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id WAA19632 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:33:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (ENxPMc1NevvFG/CF0nFEl2gxvX7bVK0J@grackle.grondar.za [196.7.18.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id WAA19620; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:33:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (nLDy4kKh26YGIgJJ09/kt7hgQf83YONK@localhost.grondar.za [127.0.0.1]) by grackle.grondar.za (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA07511; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 08:32:56 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199612100632.IAA07511@grackle.grondar.za> To: Mark Murray cc: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami), ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Perl5 (Semi-)Broken now Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 08:32:51 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Mark Murray wrote: > > Actually, is it possible to build and install the GDBM_File module > > without gdbm actually installed? > > Hmm... - I'll look at this. (Tonight only). I lied. I checked now. :-) I doesn't look like it can be done. Perl5 wants gdbm.h and libgdbm around to be able to handle this. M -- Mark Murray PGP key fingerprint = 80 36 6E 40 83 D6 8A 36 This .sig is umop ap!sdn. BC 06 EA 0E 7A F2 CE CE From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 9 22:43:27 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id WAA20381 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:43:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id WAA20376 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:43:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca4-20.ix.netcom.com [199.35.213.148]) by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA18089; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:42:51 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id GAA01037; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 06:42:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 06:42:36 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612101442.GAA01037@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: mark@grondar.za CC: mark@grondar.za, ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199612100632.IAA07511@grackle.grondar.za> (message from Mark Murray on Tue, 10 Dec 1996 08:32:51 +0200) Subject: Re: Perl5 (Semi-)Broken now From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * I doesn't look like it can be done. Perl5 wants gdbm.h and libgdbm around * to be able to handle this. Ok. I'll change the Makefile and PLIST. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 10 12:07:06 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA25915 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 12:07:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id MAA25891 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 12:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id MAA03461; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 12:07:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 12:07:08 -0800 From: obrien@NUXI.com (David E. O'Brien) To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk support for uncompressing manpages References: <199612100403.UAA27959@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.53 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 In-Reply-To: <199612100403.UAA27959@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from Satoshi Asami on Dec 9, 1996 20:03:05 -0800 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Satoshi Asami writes: > This adds a new variable MANCOMPRESSED to be defined if the man page > is already compressed by the default install. > If this is defined by the port, and NOMANCOMPRESS is defined by the > user, the manpages are uncompressed after installation. How does this affect USE_IMAKE ports? Will we have to add MANx= sections for X11 ports? Looking at /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/FreeBSD.cf and /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk, I can't find where we don't compress the manpages if NOMANCOMPRESS is defined. I'm sure I'm missing something somewhere... > In case you are wondering, this is a step towards building appropriate > PLISTs depending on the value of NOMANCOMPRESS. Are we talking about autogeneration part of pkg/PLIST? If not, do we want to look at getting the manpages from PLIST? I see room for inconsistancies between MANx= and pkg/PLIST. -- -- David (obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu) From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 10 13:08:31 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA00657 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:08:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from node15.citizen1.com (node15.citizen1.com [206.169.17.15]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id NAA00644 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:08:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from node15.citizen1.com (localhost.citizen1.com [127.0.0.1]) by node15.citizen1.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA06749 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:08:06 -0800 Message-ID: <32ADD136.41C67EA6@citizen1.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:08:06 -0800 From: Peter Bonney Organization: Citizen 1 Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1.0-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: tcl-7.5 port missing from archive on ftp.freebsd.org X-URL: http://www.freebsd.com/ports/lang.html#tclX-7.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk You're probably already aware; but in case no one has mentioned it, is missing, although there is a link to it from Thank you very much for providing this service (and, of course, for the software)! -- Peter Bonney From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 10 13:40:55 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA03447 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:40:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from po2.glue.umd.edu (root@po2.glue.umd.edu [129.2.128.45]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA03436 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:40:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from protocol.eng.umd.edu (protocol.eng.umd.edu [129.2.98.180]) by po2.glue.umd.edu (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA07812; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:40:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (chuckr@localhost) by protocol.eng.umd.edu (8.8.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA14888; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:40:47 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: protocol.eng.umd.edu: chuckr owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:40:47 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey X-Sender: chuckr@protocol.eng.umd.edu To: Peter Bonney cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcl-7.5 port missing from archive on ftp.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <32ADD136.41C67EA6@citizen1.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 10 Dec 1996, Peter Bonney wrote: > You're probably already aware; but in case no one has mentioned it, > > > > is missing, although there is a link to it from > > It's not missing by accident. Were you aware that tcl (version 7.5) has been made a part of the FreeBSD distribution itself? It's not a port anymore, but it's there! > > > Thank you very much for providing this service (and, of course, for the > software)! > > -- Peter Bonney > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and picnic, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 3.0 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 10 14:30:04 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA07256 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 14:30:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA07250; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 14:30:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 14:30:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612102230.OAA07250@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, jlemon@americantv.com Received: from sumatra.americantv.com (sumatra.americantv.com [199.184.181.250]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA07189 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 14:28:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by sumatra.americantv.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA10669; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:05:19 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199612102205.QAA10669@sumatra.americantv.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:05:19 -0600 (CST) From: jlemon@americantv.com Reply-To: jlemon@americantv.com To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2190: need cross-reference to xpdf from X11 ports tree Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2190 >Category: ports >Synopsis: need cross-reference to xpdf from X11 ports tree >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: support >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Dec 10 14:30:01 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: Jonathan Lemon >Organization: >Release: FreeBSD 2.2-961014-SNAP i386 >Environment: >Description: On the ports web page, xpdf is listed under graphics, but not under X11. I looked under X11 first, and not finding it, assumed that it wasn't ported to FreeBSD. Shouldn't there be a crossreference here somewhere? >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 10 15:01:27 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA09487 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 15:01:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (root@mexico.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA09479 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 15:01:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA16869 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:01:12 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id AAA25537 for ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:01:09 +0100 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.4/keltia-uucp-2.9) id WAA13709; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 22:56:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 22:56:57 +0100 From: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcl-7.5 port missing from archive on ftp.freebsd.org References: <32ADD136.41C67EA6@citizen1.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.53 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#2768 In-Reply-To: <32ADD136.41C67EA6@citizen1.com>; from Peter Bonney on Dec 10, 1996 13:08:06 -0800 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Peter Bonney: > That's expected because tcl 7.5 is now in the main source tree in /usr/src/contrib & /usr/src/lib/libtcl. > is missing, although there is a link to it from > > It needs to be updated... Thanks for noticing. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #31: Tue Dec 3 23:52:58 CET 1996 From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 10 16:55:07 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA17085 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id QAA17044; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:54:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca18-18.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.210]) by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA17480; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:54:19 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id QAA16211; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:54:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:54:15 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612110054.QAA16211@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, www@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Subject: Re: tcl-7.5 port missing from archive on ftp.freebsd.org From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > * > is missing, although there is a link to it from * > * > * * It needs to be updated... Thanks for noticing. Wasn't this updated nightly at 4AM? Now that I checked it, it still says "690 ports" and dated 11/26. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 10 17:40:12 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA22742 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:40:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA22735 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:40:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca18-18.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.210]) by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA03333; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:39:37 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id RAA19381; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:39:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:39:35 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612110139.RAA19381@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: obrien@NUXI.com CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk support for uncompressing manpages From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * How does this affect USE_IMAKE ports? Will we have to add MANx= sections * for X11 ports? Yes, that's what I was thinking. * Looking at /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/FreeBSD.cf and * /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk, I can't find where we don't compress the * manpages if NOMANCOMPRESS is defined. I'm sure I'm missing something * somewhere... No, I'm assuming it's going to install compressed manpages. This is a way to let bsd.port.mk uncompress man pages that are already installed compressed. By the way, if you want to let your imake generate non-compression manpage rules, you can define CompressManPages to NO. * Are we talking about autogeneration part of pkg/PLIST? If not, do we * want to look at getting the manpages from PLIST? I see room for * inconsistancies between MANx= and pkg/PLIST. Yes, to the first question. Eventually we can rip out all the manpages from pkg/PLISTs and let bsd.port.mk add them on the fly. (With the correct suffix, so pkg_delete will work.) But I don't know if we will go that far. Right now it is only to satisfy the porters who want to uncompress manpages depending on the value of NOMANCOMPRESS. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 01:05:38 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA27783 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 01:05:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id BAA27777 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 01:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca16-23.ix.netcom.com [207.94.231.87]) by dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id BAA04280; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 01:04:59 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id BAA01912; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 01:04:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 01:04:50 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612110904.BAA01912@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: james@nexis.net CC: ports@freebsd.org Subject: p5-Tk400/p5-IO From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk x11/p5-Tk400 says it depends on lib/perl5/site_perl/IO.pm but net/p5-IO installs lib/perl5/IO.pm. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 02:08:54 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA01328 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 02:08:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfw-ix9.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix9.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id CAA01297; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 02:08:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca16-23.ix.netcom.com [207.94.231.87]) by dfw-ix9.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id CAA00353; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 02:08:05 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id CAA02045; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612111008.CAA02045@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: committers@freebsd.org CC: ports@freebsd.org Subject: ports freeze at 12/28 From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ok, so here's the updated freeze date, based on Jordan's latest ETA of 2.2-RELEASE: midnight 12/28, PST. Satoshi "will this ever end?" Asami From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 09:03:35 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA22245 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 09:03:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from casimir.easynet.fr (casimir.easynet.fr [194.51.27.235]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA22237 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 09:03:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from casimir.easynet.fr (casimir.easynet.fr [194.51.27.235]) by casimir.easynet.fr (8.8.2/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA08742 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 18:02:32 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 18:02:32 +0100 (MET) From: David Ramahefason To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Gated port ?? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi folks, Is there any port for Gated ??? Thanks |David Ramahefason, rama@easynet.fr, Sysop, Easynet France SA| |http://www.easynet.fr 23, rue du Renard, 75004 Paris, FRANCE| | Think different Think BSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | | Wrap around problems with Python http://www.python.org | From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 09:18:32 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA22913 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 09:18:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (CN6FTSMHTXBg9ntxSyRys2DVQRhrCCU+@grackle.grondar.za [196.7.18.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA22901 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 09:18:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (2Yvo6b1aeHYt6JHaD8QQRDe2h4XOum/6@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grackle.grondar.za (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id TAA18187; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 19:18:02 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199612111718.TAA18187@grackle.grondar.za> To: David Ramahefason cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gated port ?? Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 19:17:58 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk David Ramahefason wrote: > Is there any port for Gated ??? /usr/ports/net/gated. M (Browse the pages @ www.freebsd.org - you may find that is faster than waiting for an email response) -- Mark Murray PGP key fingerprint = 80 36 6E 40 83 D6 8A 36 This .sig is umop ap!sdn. BC 06 EA 0E 7A F2 CE CE From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 11:06:17 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id LAA29369 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:06:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from r33h77.res.gatech.edu (r33h77.res.gatech.edu [128.61.33.77]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id LAA29362 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jason@localhost) by r33h77.res.gatech.edu (8.8.2/8.7.3) id OAA29401; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:08:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:08:00 -0500 From: jason@r33h77.res.gatech.edu (Jason Bennett) To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Lynx SSL X-Mailer: Mutt 0.52 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Has anyone successfully patched Lynx to use SSL? I have the patch files and the SSLeay port, but the patch is looking in different places for the file, and gcc is complaining about the code itself. jason -- Jason Bennett, jbennett@cc.gatech.edu | Member, Team OS/2! CS Major, Georgia Institute of Technology | Senior TA, CS 1501! Believer in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord | VP-Comm, BSU! http://bsu.gt.ed.net/~jason/ | finger for PGP key! From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 11:17:33 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id LAA00578 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:17:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id LAA00554; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:17:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA02309; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:17:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:17:21 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Satoshi Asami cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, www@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcl-7.5 port missing from archive on ftp.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199612110054.QAA16211@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 10 Dec 1996, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Wasn't this updated nightly at 4AM? Now that I checked it, it still > says "690 ports" and dated 11/26. I turned off the autopilot when /f died on freefall. Its back on now. -john From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 11:27:25 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id LAA01460 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:27:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (DhLMfFu5DCq34KFGN+hzgKSRTMzz6SpT@grackle.grondar.za [196.7.18.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id LAA01448 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (Xq+NqFhgaqTJk2GWJ+x9CGxEr9QG9qjj@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grackle.grondar.za (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA18668; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 21:26:50 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199612111926.VAA18668@grackle.grondar.za> To: jason@r33h77.res.gatech.edu (Jason Bennett) cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lynx SSL Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 21:26:49 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Has anyone successfully patched Lynx to use SSL? I have the > patch files and the SSLeay port, but the patch is looking in different > places for the file, and gcc is complaining about the code itself. Get the stuff to me and I'll add it to my list. I cannot promise speed, as I have quite a bit to do. I'll need the locations of the master stuff (ftp:// or http://) for the ports wrapper. M -- Mark Murray PGP key fingerprint = 80 36 6E 40 83 D6 8A 36 This .sig is umop ap!sdn. BC 06 EA 0E 7A F2 CE CE From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 12:19:56 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA06196 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 12:19:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id MAA06180; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 12:19:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA02451; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 15:19:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 15:19:50 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Satoshi Asami cc: ports@freebsd.org, www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/2190: need cross-reference to xpdf from X11 ports tree In-Reply-To: <199612110118.RAA16308@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 10 Dec 1996, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * On the ports web page, xpdf is listed under graphics, but not under > * X11. I looked under X11 first, and not finding it, assumed that it wasn't > * ported to FreeBSD. Shouldn't there be a crossreference here somewhere? > > The "x11" category is not intended for X applications (otherwise half > the ports tree would be there), With respect to xpdf, on the three occasions I've updated my port, I've always had trouble finding it as I instinctively equate postscript with two-dimensional static media, namely "print". I think a cross refernce there would be quite useful. > There also should be a way to add a short "comment" field to the > category name, as currently the ports web page doesn't include one and > is sort of cryptic. [WARNING: rambling ahead] Back in the good old days when the ports collection was small, finding things in a primative organizational scheme was easy. Now that the collection is growing by leaps and bounds, the interface to the collection itself becomes more critical. Activities range from simply finding new ports, to knowing what versions of what ports you have installed, being alerted when those particular ones have been updated (including update summaries), semi-automated retrieval and installation ("Click here to install") and the like. Most of this boils down to database operations. When thinking about how to improve on the www interface (and there is lots of room for that!), I keep scratching my head thinking "gee, if this stuff were all in a relational database, this would be a snap!". The ports collection meta-information is set up well for orchestrating the building of ports, but as a database, it seems a little ad-hoc. Cvs is handy for version control on individual files, but pathetic for just about any other sort of database type task. It is sort of like a library catalog where the only available search key is the call number. The ports collection clearly needs more than that, thus the creation of a secondary database, currently in the form of the INDEX file. Generating this repeatedly from scratch is terribly inefficient. What is needed is a secondary database that is updated in real-time as the cvs repository is updated. I'm no cvs wizard, but it should be possible to plant a hook in cvs to manage the updates in real-time as commits are made. A script would only need to know the name of the single affected port and it could then collect whatever information is needed for a rich, rapid access secondary database. This strikes me as being phenomenally more efficient than re-scanning the entire cvs port collection and rebuilding the INDEX file from scratch every time. This could also serve as the basis for a client-server ports/package management system, allowing people to keep their *installed* ports up-to-date without having to have the ports collection itself installed locally. Again, as the ports collection grows, keeping a local copy becomes more of a problem for people tight on disk space. Anyway, to the point, I think its time to start a closer evaluation of the ports mechanism from a access interface standpoint and see how things can be improved. In a year or so, when we have 3274 ports, I think the current arrangement will become rather awkward! Okay, I've got two more term paper to write in the next couple days. More later... -john From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 19:24:55 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA05262 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 19:24:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (from erich@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA05219; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 19:24:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 19:24:36 -0800 (PST) From: "Eric L. Hernes" Message-Id: <199612120324.TAA05219@freefall.freebsd.org> To: vince@earth.GAIANET.NET, erich, freebsd-ports Subject: Re: ports/2167 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Synopsis: slirp port seriously outdated in versions State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: erich State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 11 19:20:14 PST 1996 State-Changed-Why: upgraded to 1.0c From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 19:48:20 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA07013 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 19:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from erich@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA06993; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 19:48:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 19:48:13 -0800 (PST) From: "Eric L. Hernes" Message-Id: <199612120348.TAA06993@freefall.freebsd.org> To: nsayer@quack.kfu.com, erich, freebsd-ports Subject: Re: ports/2157 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Synopsis: new port: calctool-v2.4pl13 State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: erich State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 11 19:47:02 PST 1996 State-Changed-Why: committed, thanks! From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 21:27:59 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA17880 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 21:27:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.75]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA17867 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 21:27:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.37]) by apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id AAA06455 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:30:04 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <32AFC1A7.F32@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:26:15 -0800 From: "Pedro Giffuni S." Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: OpenLook CD available Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello: I was looking for OLWM apps, and I found this list of freeware utilities (some available on fbsd): src/xview: facman olxvman sidtool xvmines-1.0 Ftptool4.6b4 faxtool1.2 owrolo sweeper-1.1 xvnews-2.3 NADagent fsptool-1.6.1 painter textedit xvnotice apex-1.1 genix_ui pan3.0 timekeeper xvokscript catcher gil2bil phonetool tree xvset_0.80 clock graphed privtool-0.83 videoteXt-0.5 xvtdl-5.0 cmdtool guide props workman xwb coffee index.html props_ui xcalentool yamailt_ui contool-3.3a linux-fix psdraw xplan disktool-2.0 mahjongg2.1 rasview xrolo-2.06 dstool moxftp-2.2 robotx0.48 xvgr-2.09 examples ol-wais scantool xvirtual sold :( on this site : http://www.darwinsys.com/olcd/ enjoy Pedro. From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 11 21:31:56 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA18445 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 21:31:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (root@mexico.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA18428 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 21:31:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA20809 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 06:31:42 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id GAA15037 for ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 06:31:25 +0100 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.4/keltia-uucp-2.9) id CAA17834; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:03:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:03:43 +0100 From: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p5-Tk400/p5-IO References: <199612110904.BAA01912@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.53 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#2768 In-Reply-To: <199612110904.BAA01912@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from Satoshi Asami on Dec 11, 1996 01:04:50 -0800 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Satoshi Asami: > x11/p5-Tk400 says it depends on lib/perl5/site_perl/IO.pm but > net/p5-IO installs lib/perl5/IO.pm. It wants a development version of Perl, 5.003_05 I believe... IO::* has been moved into the base Perl. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #31: Tue Dec 3 23:52:58 CET 1996 From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 00:07:34 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA28031 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:07:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id AAA28020 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:07:30 -0800 (PST) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.2/8.7.3) id SAA03765; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 18:37:18 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199612120807.SAA03765@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: Ports tidy-up sweep In-Reply-To: <199612120805.SAA03739@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from Michael Smith at "Dec 12, 96 06:35:28 pm" To: msmith@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 18:37:17 +1030 (CST) Cc: mark@grondar.za, ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Michael Smith stands accused of saying: > > As always : ftp://gsoft.com.au/pub/pib/tcl.gz Ooops, try ftp://gsoft.com.au/pub/pib.tcl.gz -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[ From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 00:27:21 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA29011 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:27:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc6.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id AAA28985 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received: (from thomas@localhost) by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id JAA13770; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:26:33 +0100 From: Thomas Gellekum Message-Id: <199612120826.JAA13770@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Subject: Re: Ports tidy-up sweep To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:26:32 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199612120723.RAA03527@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from Michael Smith at "Dec 12, 96 05:53:01 pm" Organization: Institut f. Hochfrequenztechnik, RWTH Aachen X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL11 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Michael Smith wrote: > Ok, I've worked through your list (thanks for that). Here's a summary > of my results; perhaps one or more of the well-connected port-meisters > could take a swing at fixing the problems here? > > These appear to be legitimately orphaned : > ------------------------------------------ > xbakuzan.tar.gz (orphan) (3) > xlockmore-3.11.patches (orphan) > xlockmore-3.11.tar.gz (orphan) > xpdf-0.5.tar.gz (orphan) > (3) Possibly used by jp- port that I don't have locally and > which is missing a files/md5 file. Yes, only you would know, and no, respectively :-). xlockmore-3.11 is old, 3.12 is the current version. xpdf is at 0.6. > It is clear that for some ports, the files/md5 file can't be used. Could > I perhaps campaign for a files/md5.ignore file listing the names of files > which belong to the port but whose checksum should not be checked? That would be easy. Simply creating one should suffice because only the files in ${MD5_FILE} are actually checked. tg From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 02:07:39 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA03479 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from solar.tlk.com (root@solar.tlk.com [194.97.84.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id CAA03403; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:06:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by solar.tlk.com id ; Thu, 12 Dec 96 11:06 MET Message-Id: From: torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum) Subject: Re: ports/2190: need cross-reference to xpdf from X11 ports tree In-Reply-To: from John Fieber at "Dec 11, 96 03:19:50 pm" To: jfieber@indiana.edu (John Fieber) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 11:06:10 +0100 (MET) Cc: asami@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, www@freebsd.org Reply-To: torstenb@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL26 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk John Fieber wrote: > Back in the good old days when the ports collection was small, > finding things in a primative organizational scheme was easy. > Now that the collection is growing by leaps and bounds, the > interface to the collection itself becomes more critical. agreed > Activities range from simply finding new ports, to knowing what > versions of what ports you have installed, being alerted when > those particular ones have been updated (including update > summaries), semi-automated retrieval and installation ("Click > here to install") and the like. I think we really need a notification service for the ports area, but... > I'm no cvs wizard, but it should be possible to plant a hook in > cvs to manage the updates in real-time as commits are made. A > script would only need to know the name of the single affected > port and it could then collect whatever information is needed for > a rich, rapid access secondary database. This strikes me as > being phenomenally more efficient than re-scanning the entire cvs > port collection and rebuilding the INDEX file from scratch every > time. These notification messages should be limited to changes affecting the installation. No Notification should ne send if the vars in the port Makefile are reorg. or the master site has changed (just examples). For most people this is just "noise" - they don't care about it... This makes the real-time update of a "ports database" during cvs commits more difficult. -tb From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 02:45:51 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA05053 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:45:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.my.domain (fish-43.ppp.hooked.net [206.80.10.43]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id CAA05033; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:45:28 -0800 (PST) From: dicen@hooked.net Received: from pegasus (localhost.hooked.net [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA16677; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:45:15 GMT Message-ID: <32AF71BA.794BDF32@hooked.net> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:45:14 +0000 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: torstenb@freebsd.org CC: John Fieber , asami@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/2190: need cross-reference to xpdf from X11 ports tree References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Torsten Blum wrote: > > John Fieber wrote: > > > Back in the good old days when the ports collection was small, > > finding things in a primative organizational scheme was easy. > > Now that the collection is growing by leaps and bounds, the > > interface to the collection itself becomes more critical. > > agreed > > > Activities range from simply finding new ports, to knowing what > > versions of what ports you have installed, being alerted when > > those particular ones have been updated (including update > > summaries), semi-automated retrieval and installation ("Click > > here to install") and the like. > > I think we really need a notification service for the ports area, > but... > > > I'm no cvs wizard, but it should be possible to plant a hook in > > cvs to manage the updates in real-time as commits are made. A > > script would only need to know the name of the single affected > > port and it could then collect whatever information is needed for > > a rich, rapid access secondary database. This strikes me as > > being phenomenally more efficient than re-scanning the entire cvs Well, I think sup.freebsd.org would always have to scan all the ports unless you downloaded the entire /usr/ports tree. You can't have the master site or server go out to the clients, you must have the clients go to the server. This however does not represent a problem. > > port collection and rebuilding the INDEX file from scratch every > > time. I totally agree here. The ports management system (or lack there of) needs major improvement. The package system isn't much better. > > These notification messages should be limited to changes affecting the > installation. No Notification should ne send if the vars in the > port Makefile are reorg. or the master site has changed (just examples). > For most people this is just "noise" - they don't care about it... > Not for me it isn't. When new FreeBSD releases are installed a lot of ports and packages ussually break. A library gets renamed the /proc file system is changeg, etc.. This is really anoying. > This makes the real-time update of a "ports database" during cvs commits > more difficult. > > -tb Nah, Rubbish. cvs commits would update the ports database yes at the master site. It would not update everyones ports databases since they would have to go update there own systems from the database at the master site. What needs to be done is simple. Instead of having all of these ports in /usr/ports with only some of them installed. A database needs to be made that contains only those ports that have been compiled and then installed as a package. Then just run sup ports-cvs to update all of the ports in /usr/ports. If on the local system if one or more of these ports happens to change when the /usr/ports are updated then run a script which reinstalls the port. Not hard. Another thing: Why not use the Red Hat Port Managment system. Haveing SRPMS packages would be the way to go here. It has already been done so you don't have to code it and it is sort of the Free OS industry standard now. dicen From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 03:02:44 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA05689 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 03:02:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id DAA05668; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 03:02:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id DAA04019; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 03:02:28 -0800 (PST) To: dicen@hooked.net cc: torstenb@freebsd.org, John Fieber , asami@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/2190: need cross-reference to xpdf from X11 ports tree In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:45:14 GMT." <32AF71BA.794BDF32@hooked.net> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 03:02:28 -0800 Message-ID: <4015.850388548@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I totally agree here. The ports management system (or lack there of) > needs major improvement. The package system isn't much better. We arrive at this point about once every 6 months. In order to save time for all concerned, here's the script we generally use: 0. Someone complains about an obvious shortcoming of the ports & packaging system which has been known about for (checks watch) going on 3 years now. 1. I respond with "we know both systems are deficient, please submit your prototype code for improving it and we'll start the review process; a catalog of shortcomings we already have, it's working solutions we need now." 2. The original folks complaining about the ports/package system come back with "oh, I'm much too busy/inexperienced/tired to actually do anything about it right now, I just thought you'd want to know." 3. A few people who are genuinely motivated to work on the problem but truly far too busy to do anything else submit tentative proposals "in case anyone should want to pick [the problem] up." Someone also usually suggests the PRMs about this point and starts a whole sub-discussion on their shortcomings. 4. I submit a longer proposal based on several of the other proposals which only one or two people actually read, the rest going "damn, there's another really long proposal from jkh! I'll, erm, file it." 5. Most agree that there have been some "really good ideas discussed, yep, and wouldn't the ports/packages system be better off if someone implemented them. Yep." 6. Silence. 7. Unconditional branch to step 0. :-) Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 03:38:43 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA07435 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 03:38:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.my.domain (fish-43.ppp.hooked.net [206.80.10.43]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id DAA07415; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 03:38:19 -0800 (PST) From: dicen@hooked.net Received: from pegasus (localhost.hooked.net [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA18616; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 03:37:36 GMT Message-ID: <32AF7DFD.15FB7483@hooked.net> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 03:37:33 +0000 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" CC: torstenb@freebsd.org, John Fieber , asami@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/2190: need cross-reference to xpdf from X11 ports tree References: <4015.850388548@time.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > I totally agree here. The ports management system (or lack there of) > > needs major improvement. The package system isn't much better. > > We arrive at this point about once every 6 months. In order to save > time for all concerned, here's the script we generally use: > > 0. Someone complains about an obvious shortcoming of the ports & packaging > system which has been known about for (checks watch) going on 3 years > now. > > 1. I respond with "we know both systems are deficient, please submit your > prototype code for improving it and we'll start the review process; a > catalog of shortcomings we already have, it's working solutions we need > now." > > 2. The original folks complaining about the ports/package system > come back with "oh, I'm much too busy/inexperienced/tired to actually > do anything about it right now, I just thought you'd want to know." > No sorry, this isn't me. > 3. A few people who are genuinely motivated to work on the problem but > truly far too busy to do anything else submit tentative proposals > "in case anyone should want to pick [the problem] up." Someone also > usually suggests the PRMs about this point and starts a whole > sub-discussion on their shortcomings. This is where I come in but I don't do the discussions. I have hated this damn ports system so long. This is what I am doing. For a temporary fix I will finish the little scripts I started that update the ports when the entire /usr/ports tree is updated with cvs. I don't consider this much of anything though. For a more permanent system I will look into rmp. I would like to use redhats X based apps motified for FreeBSD. I don't know much about them, can I get the source or does Red Hat own that part? Failing X based rpm I may go still use text based rmp. I will see how it goes. In the meen time this is the load you will expect on your server sup.FreeBSD.org if that is what users are expected to use. A. A user wishes to install a port. He types ...portinstall foobar..... 0. Error checking done. 1. The user's /usr/ports is updated with cvs. 2. A make is done in the appropriate directory to install the port. 3. If successful a make install is done. 4. If successful a database file is updated (text file) saying the port installed with version fooversion. 5. If not successful an error message is returned. 6. A make clean is done in the appropriate directory. B. A user wishes to update all of the ports. He types ...portupdate all... 0. Error checking done. 1. The user's /usr/ports is updated with cvs. 2. A loop begins. 3. A make is done in an installed ports directory. 4. If successful a pkg_delete is executed to remove the port's old installed files. (unless make reinstall always works which I doubt) 5. If successfull a make install is done of the new port. 6. If not successful an error is printed. 7. Loop back to 2. Depending on the time it takes to do a cvs and how many ports are installed, it may be wise to do a fetch for the ports themselves from ftp.freebsd.org or a mirror. This would replace 1. is both A and B with fetches. Other options that would be nice are CFLAGS settings and which compiler to use (although this introduces dependences) in the ports database file. Now what all of this leaves out is maintaining the ftp.freebsd.org site. That is the hard part. The /usr/ports must be uptodate. I never said I would write those scripts. I suspect that have already been written. dicen I don't do the politico bellow. > > 4. I submit a longer proposal based on several of the other proposals > which only one or two people actually read, the rest going "damn, > there's another really long proposal from jkh! I'll, erm, file it." > > 5. Most agree that there have been some "really good ideas discussed, yep, > and wouldn't the ports/packages system be better off if someone > implemented them. Yep." > > 6. Silence. > > 7. Unconditional branch to step 0. > > :-) > > Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 09:10:05 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA23315 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA23308; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:10:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:10:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612121710.JAA23308@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, mita@jp.FreeBSD.org (MITA Yoshio) Received: from hanpen.fujita3.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp (hanpen.fujita3.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp [157.82.109.66]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA23148 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:05:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mita@localhost) by hanpen.fujita3.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp (8.8.2/8.8.2) id CAA00788; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 02:09:26 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199612121709.CAA00788@hanpen.fujita3.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 02:09:26 +0900 (JST) From: mita@jp.FreeBSD.org (MITA Yoshio) Reply-To: mita@jp.FreeBSD.org (MITA Yoshio) To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2201: missing file entry VF.h in japanese/vflib/pkg/PLIST Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2201 >Category: ports >Synopsis: file entry is incomplete for japanese/vflib ports >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Dec 12 09:10:01 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: MITA Yoshio >Organization: the University of Tokyo >Release: FreeBSD 2.2-ALPHA i386 >Environment: FreBSD 2.2-ALPHA with ports-current/japanese/vflib >Description: I forgot to contain ${PREFIX}/include/VF.h in jp-vflib-2.22 ports. >How-To-Repeat: Simply take a look to vflib/pkg/PLIST >Fix: A patch is enclosed. apply please! *** japanese/vflib/pkg/PLIST.orig Fri Dec 13 01:57:22 1996 --- japanese/vflib/pkg/PLIST Fri Dec 13 01:57:38 1996 *************** *** 1,3 **** --- 1,4 ---- + include/VF.h lib/VFlib.a lib/libVFlib.a lib/libVFlib.so.2.22 Thanks, MITA Yoshio >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 15:53:35 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA19728 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 15:53:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (from max@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA19673; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 15:53:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 15:53:21 -0800 (PST) From: Masafumi NAKANE Message-Id: <199612122353.PAA19673@freefall.freebsd.org> To: mita@jp.FreeBSD.org, max, freebsd-ports Subject: Re: ports/2201 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Synopsis: file entry is incomplete for japanese/vflib ports State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: max State-Changed-When: Thu Dec 12 15:52:05 PST 1996 State-Changed-Why: Suggested change made in pkg/PLIST Rev.1.3. From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 15:59:17 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA21132 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 15:59:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from po2.glue.umd.edu (root@po2.glue.umd.edu [129.2.128.45]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA21079; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 15:59:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ginger.eng.umd.edu (ginger.eng.umd.edu [129.2.103.20]) by po2.glue.umd.edu (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA23248; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 18:59:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (chuckr@localhost) by ginger.eng.umd.edu (8.8.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA07601; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 18:59:01 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: ginger.eng.umd.edu: chuckr owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 18:59:01 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey X-Sender: chuckr@ginger.eng.umd.edu To: FreeBSD-Hackers cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: lint Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Does anyone know the parentage of /usr/bin/lint? I'd thought that it originally grew out of lclint, but when I looked at the sources, lclint didn't seem to be listed (it looks like an import from NetBSD). I was wondering, in the light of our new lclint port, I wanted to make sure it _was_ different. Thanks ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and picnic, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 3.0 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 16:42:39 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA26829 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 16:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id QAA26737; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 16:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id BAA03414; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 01:41:21 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id BAA16137; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 01:41:21 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.2/8.6.9) id BAA14253; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 01:30:51 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199612130030.BAA14253@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: lint To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 01:30:50 +0100 (MET) Cc: FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: from Chuck Robey at "Dec 12, 96 06:59:01 pm" X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Chuck Robey wrote: > Does anyone know the parentage of /usr/bin/lint? I'd thought that it > originally grew out of lclint, but when I looked at the sources, lclint > didn't seem to be listed (it looks like an import from NetBSD). It has been written from scratch by Jochen Pohl for the NetBSD project. I'm not sure whether Jochen still maintains it for NetBSD, now that he went out to become a co-founder of his own company. The only reason why it's still not yet enabled in our source tree is since our libc is simply not lintable. :-( Last time i've been checking (around the time i've imported Jochen's lint), there was a type clash between `struct pmap', which describes a connection to the portmapper if used in an RPC context, but is used for some page map stuff in the /usr/include/sys/ header files. Since libc #include's both meanings, lint doesn't pass through. It requires somebody to pick all this lint stuff as his pet project, and cleans up the remaining bogons in the tree. It's quite a little more work than just a weekend to spend though. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 16:52:59 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA27722 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 16:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA27717 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 16:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.2/8.7.3) id LAA08761; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 11:22:31 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199612130052.LAA08761@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: Ports tidy-up sweep In-Reply-To: <199612120956.LAA22926@grackle.grondar.za> from Mark Murray at "Dec 12, 96 11:56:30 am" To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 11:22:30 +1030 (CST) Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk (moved to -ports) Mark Murray stands accused of saying: > > First - the md5 scan took 9 1/2 mins ( my machine was busy, so not bad). I should perhaps add some intelligence to the status updater that tracks the size of files being md5'd and the time it takes to come up with yet another benchmark 8) I'm sick; I just did; about 200K/sec on my mostly-empty distfiles collection. > Next - the ports without checksums (as usual): > > ru-netscape-2.02: no 'md5' file in '/usr/ports/russian/netscape2.language/files' > ru-netscape-3.01: no 'md5' file in '/usr/ports/russian/netscape3.language/files' > ru-pine-3.95: no 'md5' file in '/usr/ports/russian/pine.language/files' How about postgres95? Has something changed there that I haven't seen here yet? > Next'' - I hit "delete stale", it works just fine, but it would be quite > nice if it updated the list, rather than waiting for me to rescan. Ta; implemented. > Mark Murray PGP key fingerprint = 80 36 6E 40 83 D6 8A 36 -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[ From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 17:39:24 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA00746 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 17:39:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailer.together.net (mailer.together.net [204.97.120.27]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id RAA00740 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 17:39:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from sequoia.together.net (sequoia.together.net [204.97.120.25]) by mailer.together.net (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id UAA06154 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 20:39:22 -0500 Received: from [207.41.55.130] (PORT-02-MAX-RTV-01.ramp.together.net [207.41.55.130]) by sequoia.together.net (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id UAA22992 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 20:39:10 -0500 (EST) X-Sender: nsl.together.net (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 20:40:27 -0400 To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: chalidze@chalidze.com (Valery Chalidze) Subject: WINDOW TO AMERICA Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Increase your visibility! Have a small WEB site on an American server. Special price for our East European and Central Asian customers: Business card on Internet -- 3,000 char. -- $50 per year FREE standard design. PRE-PAYMENT by check or Money-order. No credit cards. View samples at http://www.chalidze.com Chalidze Publications, RR2 Box 6880, Fair Haven VT 05743 From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 18:11:45 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id SAA02685 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 18:11:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from stanton-1-1.quick.net (root@stanton-1-1.quick.net [205.153.188.101]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id SAA02672 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 18:11:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (soil@localhost) by stanton-1-1.quick.net (8.8.4/8.8.3) with SMTP id SAA25173; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 18:11:08 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: stanton-1-1.quick.net: soil owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 18:11:08 -0800 (PST) From: Josh Gilliam To: bmc@willscreek.com cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: "linuxls" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I downloaded latest GNU fileutils from ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/ and found that the port name "linuxls" is inappropriate. I suggest the name be changed to "gnuls". Josh Gilliam -- soil@quick.net From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 21:50:04 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA20731 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 21:50:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA20721; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 21:50:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 21:50:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612130550.VAA20721@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, dawes@physics.usyd.edu.au Received: from landfill.physics.usyd.edu.au (landfill.physics.usyd.edu.au [129.78.129.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA20222 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 21:44:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dawes@localhost) by landfill.physics.usyd.edu.au (8.8.2/8.8.2) id QAA10123; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:43:56 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <199612130543.QAA10123@landfill.physics.usyd.edu.au> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:43:56 +1100 (EST) From: dawes@physics.usyd.edu.au Reply-To: dawes@physics.usyd.edu.au To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: dawes@physics.usyd.edu.au X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2203: Team's exit status doesn't indicate if there were I/O errors Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2203 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Team's exit status doesn't indicate if there were I/O errors >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Dec 12 21:50:01 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: David Dawes >Organization: University of Sydney, Australia >Release: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386 >Environment: >Description: Team's exit status will be 0 even if there is an I/O error. The reason is that the exit status of the "guys" isn't checked. >How-To-Repeat: Set team's stderr to a file so it doesn't prompt the user on an I/O error, and use it to write enough to overfill a device. Check the exit status, and note that it is zero. >Fix: The following patch fixes this problem. *** Makefile.ORIG Fri Dec 13 16:26:46 1996 --- Makefile Fri Dec 13 16:27:19 1996 *************** *** 3,8 **** BINDIR= ${PREFIX}/bin MANDIR= ${PREFIX}/man/man ! CFLAGS+= -DHAVE_PARAM_H .include --- 3,8 ---- BINDIR= ${PREFIX}/bin MANDIR= ${PREFIX}/man/man ! CFLAGS+= -DHAVE_PARAM_H -DHAVE_WAIT_H .include *** team.c.ORIG Fri Dec 13 16:26:50 1996 --- team.c Fri Dec 13 16:28:14 1996 *************** *** 84,89 **** --- 84,92 ---- #include #include #include + #ifdef HAVE_WAIT_H + #include + #endif #ifdef HAVE_PARAM_H #include *************** *** 165,170 **** --- 168,174 ---- local bool verbose = false; local bool report = true; + local bool guyhaderror = false; extern int errno; local time_t origin; *************** *** 647,653 **** { mesg("team: guy pid %u: %s\n",guy->pid,errormsg); call GuySEND(guy,TokenABORT,FdERROR,0L); ! exit(1); /*NOTREACHED*/ } --- 651,657 ---- { mesg("team: guy pid %u: %s\n",guy->pid,errormsg); call GuySEND(guy,TokenABORT,FdERROR,0L); ! exit(2); /*NOTREACHED*/ } *************** *** 874,879 **** --- 878,891 ---- --team->active; + #ifdef WIFEXITED + /* If a guy had an error, its exit status is 2. Also catch a killed guy */ + if ((WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status) == 2) || + (WIFSIGNALED(status) && WTERMSIG(status) != SIGPIPE)) { + guyhaderror = true; + } + #endif + if (status != 0 && team->active != 0) return false; } *************** *** 1042,1047 **** --- 1054,1065 ---- origin = time((time_t *) 0); + /* + * Ignore SIGPIPE. The parent or some guys can get this signal at the end, + * and it affects the exit status reporting. + */ + signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); + if (!TeamStart(&team,bufsize,isize,osize)) { mesg("team: cannot start the team\n"); *************** *** 1062,1067 **** --- 1080,1091 ---- if (!TeamClose(&team)) { mesg("team: cannot close the team\n"); + return 1; + } + + if (guyhaderror) + { + mesg("team: guy had error\n"); return 1; } >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 22:00:05 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id WAA21495 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 22:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id WAA21488; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 22:00:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 22:00:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612130600.WAA21488@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, dawes@physics.usyd.edu.au Received: from landfill.physics.usyd.edu.au (landfill.physics.usyd.edu.au [129.78.129.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA20992 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 21:53:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dawes@localhost) by landfill.physics.usyd.edu.au (8.8.2/8.8.2) id QAA10241; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:52:58 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <199612130552.QAA10241@landfill.physics.usyd.edu.au> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:52:58 +1100 (EST) From: dawes@physics.usyd.edu.au Reply-To: dawes@physics.usyd.edu.au To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: dawes@physics.usyd.edu.au X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2204: Team can hang when stderr is a file Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2204 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Team can hang when stderr is a file. >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Dec 12 22:00:01 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: David Dawes >Organization: University of Sydney, Australia >Release: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386 >Environment: >Description: I've seen team hang when stderr is a file. 'top' reports that it is stuck in lockf. >How-To-Repeat: Run team with stderr set to a file. Sometimes it hangs. >Fix: I haven't looked into this very deeply, but #undef'ing F_SETLKW seems to avoid the problem. This is already done for SunOS (maybe for the same reason?). *** team.c.ORIG Fri Dec 13 16:26:50 1996 --- team.c Fri Dec 13 16:28:14 1996 *************** *** 94,99 **** --- 94,103 ---- # undef F_SETLKW #endif + #ifdef __FreeBSD__ + # undef F_SETLKW + #endif + #if (PCG) # include "Extend.h" # include "Here.h" >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 12 23:48:11 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA29382 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 23:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc6.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id XAA29373 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 1996 23:48:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from thomas@localhost) by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id IAA15422 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 08:47:45 +0100 From: Thomas Gellekum Message-Id: <199612130747.IAA15422@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Subject: Current state of octave port To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 08:47:43 +0100 (MET) Organization: Institut f. Hochfrequenztechnik, RWTH Aachen X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL11 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Moin, as promised, I've put together a few files which might help to get somebody into looking what's wrong with our octave port (or gcc?). The files are in freefall:~tg/octave.tar.gz; there's a short README inside that tarball. tg From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 13 05:33:18 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id FAA17134 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 05:33:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from joerg@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id FAA17080; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 05:33:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 05:33:01 -0800 (PST) From: Joerg Wunsch Message-Id: <199612131333.FAA17080@freefall.freebsd.org> To: joerg, freebsd-ports, joerg Subject: Re: ports/2203 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Synopsis: Team's exit status doesn't indicate if there were I/O errors Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->joerg Responsible-Changed-By: joerg Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Dec 13 14:32:25 MET 1996 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'm the maintainer. From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 13 05:33:53 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id FAA17214 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 05:33:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from joerg@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id FAA17182; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 05:33:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 05:33:26 -0800 (PST) From: Joerg Wunsch Message-Id: <199612131333.FAA17182@freefall.freebsd.org> To: joerg, freebsd-ports, joerg Subject: Re: ports/2204 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Synopsis: Team can hang when stderr is a file. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->joerg Responsible-Changed-By: joerg Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Dec 13 14:32:25 MET 1996 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'm the maintainer. From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 13 07:13:13 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA23599 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:13:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from battra.telebase.com (root@battra.telebase.com [192.132.57.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA23589 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:13:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from wormhole.telebase.com by battra.telebase.com id KAA11357; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:13:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from odo.telebase.com (odo.telebase.com [172.16.2.217]) by wormhole.telebase.com (8.8.3/8.8.1) with ESMTP id KAA17447; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:13:00 -0500 (EST) Received: (from bmc@localhost) by odo.telebase.com (8.8.3/8.8.1) id KAA08741; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:13:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:13:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199612131513.KAA08741@odo.telebase.com> From: Brian Clapper To: Josh Gilliam Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, bmc@n2k.com, bmc@WillsCreek.COM Subject: Re: "linuxls" In-Reply-To: <21201948@toto.iv> Organization: N2K Inc Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Josh" == Josh Gilliam writes: Josh> I downloaded latest GNU fileutils from ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/ Josh> and found that the port name "linuxls" is inappropriate. I suggest Josh> the name be changed to "gnuls". Josh, I haven't looked at the latest version of fileutils. I assume you're implying that the latest GNU fileutils `ls' has rolled in the Linux colorization. If so, you're right, the port name probably ought to be changed. I should also update to the port to use the latest GNU source. I'll look into it. Thanks. ---- Brian Clapper, bmc@WillsCreek.COM -or- bmc@n2k.com Once upon a time, in a galaxy far, far away... From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 13 07:30:04 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA24372 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:30:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA24366; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:30:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:30:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612131530.HAA24366@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, Josh Gilliam Received: from stanton-1-1.quick.net (root@stanton-1-1.quick.net [205.153.188.101]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA24152 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:26:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from soil@localhost) by stanton-1-1.quick.net (8.8.4/8.8.3) id HAA01925; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:26:24 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612131526.HAA01925@stanton-1-1.quick.net> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:26:24 -0800 (PST) From: Josh Gilliam Reply-To: Josh Gilliam To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2207: bash hangs tty and uses all cpu when TERM is exported to "" Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2207 >Category: ports >Synopsis: bash hangs tty and uses all cpu when TERM is exported to "" >Confidential: yes >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Dec 13 07:30:01 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: Josh Gilliam >Organization: >Release: FreeBSD 2.1.6.1-RELEASE i386 >Environment: FreeBSD stanton-1-1.quick.net 2.1.6-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.1.6-RELEASE #0: Fri Dec 6 19:19:47 PST 1996 soil@stanton-1-2.quick.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/soil i386 GNU bash, version 1.14.7(1) >Description: When TERM is exported to "" under GNU bash, the current tty freezes and cpu gradually rises to 100%. The process is unkillable from the current tty. >How-To-Repeat: $ /usr/local/bin/bash bash$ export TERM="" >Fix: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 13 21:00:30 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA06097 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 21:00:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from veda.is (adam@ubiq.veda.is [193.4.230.60]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA06075; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 21:00:23 -0800 (PST) Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.8.4/8.7.3) id FAA02445; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 05:04:42 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199612140504.FAA02445@veda.is> Subject: pidentd works now To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 05:04:37 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk pidentd is now working again in -current, in case anyone is still wondering about it. -- Adam David From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 13 23:10:05 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA14933 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 23:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA14927; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 23:10:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 23:10:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612140710.XAA14927@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, sanpei@yy.cs.keio.ac.jp Received: from chizuru.yy.cs.keio.ac.jp (chizuru.yy.cs.keio.ac.jp [131.113.47.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id XAA14893 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 23:09:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lavender.yy.cs.keio.ac.jp ([203.140.35.8]) by chizuru.yy.cs.keio.ac.jp (8.6.12+2.5W/3.1W-2.8compat) with ESMTP id QAA28549 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 16:09:37 +0900 Received: (from sanpei@localhost) by lavender.yy.cs.keio.ac.jp (8.7.6/3.5Wbeta) id QAA23451; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 16:09:36 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199612140709.QAA23451@lavender.yy.cs.keio.ac.jp> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 16:09:36 +0900 (JST) From: sanpei@yy.cs.keio.ac.jp Reply-To: sanpei@yy.cs.keio.ac.jp To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2209: updated jp-mh ports files Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2209 >Category: ports >Synopsis: updated jp-mh ports files >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Dec 13 23:10:01 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: MIHIRA Yoshiro >Organization: Keio Univ. Japan >Release: FreeBSD 2.2-961014-SNAP i386 >Environment: >Description: I updated jp-mh(ports/japanese/mh), and put ports files: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/incoming/jp-mh-96121401.tar.gz Changes: *support POP protocols* patch-aa support POP protocols (RPOP) patch-ab speed-up folder command patch from mew patch-ac import from mail/mh/patches/patch-ac patch-ag smail (X-au..) error patch from mew patch-ah for MPOP,BPOP Please submit these changes. Thank you. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Dec 14 07:30:07 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA07484 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 07:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA07473; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 07:30:04 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 07:30:04 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612141530.HAA07473@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, furusawa@com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp Received: from deanna.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp (deanna.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp [157.16.16.8]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA06991 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 07:27:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from omega10.com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp by deanna.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp (8.8.4+2.7Wbeta4/3.3W9-960804) id AAA02047; Sun, 15 Dec 1996 00:27:12 +0900 (JST) Received: from marius.com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp by omega10.com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp (8.8.4+2.7Wbeta4/3.5W-961209) id AAA29246; Sun, 15 Dec 1996 00:26:54 +0859 (JST) Received: by marius.com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp (8.8.4+2.7Wbeta4/3.5W-961126) id AAA05247; Sun, 15 Dec 1996 00:27:09 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199612141527.AAA05247@marius.com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 00:27:09 +0900 (JST) From: furusawa@com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp Reply-To: furusawa@com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: furusawa@com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2213: New ports collescction : xengine-pl1 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2213 >Category: ports >Synopsis: New ports collescction : xengine-pl1 >Confidential: yes >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 14 07:30:02 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: FURUSAWA,Kazuhisa >Organization: >Release: FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386 >Environment: >Description: >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: Hello! I would like to contribute a new ports collection named `xengine-pl1'(ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/incoming/ xengine-ports.1215.tar.gz) xloadface-1.6.1 is a benchmark program for X. Please have a look at it. - - / _/_/ College of Eng., Osaka Prefecture Univ. - -(__o_ _/_/ FURUSAWA, Kazuhisa O \ T _/_/ e-mail:furusawa@com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp | / \ _/_/ http://www.com.cs.osakafu-u.ac.jp/~furusawa/ KAZ ----------------NEVER ASK ME WHY------------- From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Dec 14 13:50:03 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA16949 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 13:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA16943; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 13:50:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 13:50:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199612142150.NAA16943@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-ports Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, shanee@rabbit.augusta.de Received: from inga.augusta.de (root@inga.augusta.de [193.175.23.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id NAA16506 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 13:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rabbit by inga.augusta.de with uucp (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0vZ1sn-004cr5C; Sat, 14 Dec 96 22:44 MET Received: by rabbit.augusta.de (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0vYy2U-000FzrC; Sat, 14 Dec 96 18:38 MET Message-Id: Date: Sat, 14 Dec 96 18:38 MET From: shanee@rabbit.augusta.de Reply-To: shanee@rabbit.augusta.de To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: ports/2215: error in /usr/ports/sysutils/xcpustat/Makefile Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 2215 >Category: ports >Synopsis: error in /usr/ports/sysutils/xcpustat/Makefile >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 14 13:50:00 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: Andreas Kohout >Organization: Privat Site running FreeBSD >Release: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386 >Environment: ctm-ports.1521.gz >Description: While kreating README.html or index ther is an error: ===> sysutils/xcpustate "Makefile", line 16: Unassociated shell command "${MASTER_SITE_XCONTRIB}" >How-To-Repeat: goto /usr/ports and do a make readmes or ports-index >Fix: in /usr/ports/sysutils/xcpustate/Makefile delete line 15 >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: