From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Dec 15 22:24:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA28757 for emulation-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 22:24:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation) Received: from fang.cs.sunyit.edu (root@fang.cs.sunyit.edu [192.52.220.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA28746 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 22:24:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from umji@fang.cs.sunyit.edu) Received: from localhost (umji@localhost) by fang.cs.sunyit.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA01653 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 02:22:05 GMT Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 02:22:05 +0000 (GMT) From: Michael Imor To: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Linux emulation DNS lookups Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The latest linux emulation revisions seem to have fixed DNS lookups. Thanks, now I can go back to playing glquake in FreeBSD! :) Mike From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Dec 17 21:25:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA19321 for emulation-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:25:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation) Received: from mail-gw.pacbell.net (mail-gw.pacbell.net [206.13.28.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA19316 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:25:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from schluntz@pacbell.net) Received: from [206.170.30.53] (ppp-206-170-30-53.hywr01.pacbell.net [206.170.30.53]) by mail-gw.pacbell.net (8.8.8/8.7.1+antispam) with SMTP id VAA17675 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:25:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199712180525.VAA17675@mail-gw.pacbell.net> Subject: Linux LKM Emulation Question Date: Wed, 17 Dec 97 21:28:28 -0700 x-sender: schluntz@postoffice.pacbell.net x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v2, June 6, 1997 From: "Sean J. Schluntz" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have a question about the speed difference between the Linux LKM and the kernel option for Linux. I'm going to be running at least one program a lot on my system that is a Linux program (Executor the Mac emulator) and I have 64megs of RAM. Will I seen any speed increase by building Linux in to the FreeBSD kernel (v2.2.5) over using the LKM, or should I stick with the LKM? Thanks for your time! -Sean ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Sean J. Schluntz schluntz@pinpt.com Systems Engineer (408) 997-6900 x222 PinPoint Software Corporation http://www.pinpt.com From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Dec 18 04:02:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA12732 for emulation-outgoing; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 04:02:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation) Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp10.portal.net.au [202.12.71.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA12722 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 04:02:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA00598; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 22:27:18 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199712181157.WAA00598@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: "Sean J. Schluntz" cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux LKM Emulation Question In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:28:28 PDT." <199712180525.VAA17675@mail-gw.pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 22:27:17 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I'm going to be running at least one program a lot on my system that is a > Linux program (Executor the Mac emulator) and I have 64megs of RAM. Will > I seen any speed increase by building Linux in to the FreeBSD kernel > (v2.2.5) over using the LKM, or should I stick with the LKM? Nothing noticeable. We've benched it fairly closely (as we use Linux-mode code a lot), but haven't come up with any real indication one over the other. mike From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Dec 18 08:59:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA02842 for emulation-outgoing; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 08:59:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA02822 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 08:58:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA26200; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 22:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from UNKNOWN(), claiming to be "current1.whistle.com" via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd026197; Wed Dec 17 22:23:23 1997 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 22:20:38 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: "Sean J. Schluntz" cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux LKM Emulation Question In-Reply-To: <199712180525.VAA17675@mail-gw.pacbell.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Once the LKM is loaded. itis *ALMOST* identical.. the difference is: the init routine is called from a different place and the virtual addresses of the routines are slightly different. Functionally they are identical. On Wed, 17 Dec 1997, Sean J. Schluntz wrote: > I have a question about the speed difference between the Linux LKM and > the kernel option for Linux. > > I'm going to be running at least one program a lot on my system that is a > Linux program (Executor the Mac emulator) and I have 64megs of RAM. Will > I seen any speed increase by building Linux in to the FreeBSD kernel > (v2.2.5) over using the LKM, or should I stick with the LKM? > > Thanks for your time! > > -Sean > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sean J. Schluntz schluntz@pinpt.com > Systems Engineer (408) 997-6900 x222 > PinPoint Software Corporation http://www.pinpt.com > >