Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:38:00 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getcwd() as syscall... Message-ID: <1328.874222680@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 13 Sep 1997 22:01:50 -0000." <199709132201.PAA29443@usr03.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry, read up on the code before you speak. It's always a good idea There is one point where you by accident is not entirely wrong, but it is obvious from the rest that you don't know why that statement is somewhat true. I will leave it to you to figure out which one. I will only address the two most wrong points here: >Other than that, it's a *great* idea, and the purpose behind >the parent pointers in the first place. 8-) 8-). No it wasn't. [*] >Oh... is there an option to fsck to set these on a legacy FS? They are not stored on disk. Poul-Henning [*] And before you launch into a long tirade on this point, please look in the CVS files and see who added them. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1328.874222680>