From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Feb 8 12:48:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA01340 for hardware-outgoing; Sun, 8 Feb 1998 12:48:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from master.inter-linc.net ([12.10.101.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA01332 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 1998 12:48:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cdillon@inter-linc.net) Received: from cheetah.inter-linc.net (12.10.101.15) by master.inter-linc.net (Worldmail 1.3.167); 8 Feb 1998 14:47:06 -0600 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1 [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199802072146.NAA05731@dingo.cdrom.com> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 1998 14:43:45 -0600 (CST) From: Chris Dillon To: Mike Smith Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD support.... Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, bahwi@technologist.com Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 07-Feb-98 Mike Smith wrote: >> ULTRA SCSI III CONTROLLER INTERNAL NEW >> (found at http://www.surplusdirect.com) >> Model is PCIU > >It's actually a CSC product (www.corpsys.com), and cheaper from CSC (I >think). There's not enough data on it to know what it is. Buy one and >try it. I believe this is a NCR 53c875 based card, and CSC wants too much money for it. If its based on the same chip as everything else, why pay more? :-) When I bought my Tekram DC-390F for $114 from 5-OClock Computers last year, everybody else was selling the same card for $150, and CSC still wants $139 for their version today. The Diamond Fireport40 (same chip) is also about $140. I am very happy with my Tekram card, and have found no reason to want any one of the above cards. --- Chris Dillon --- cdillon@inter-linc.net --- Powered by FreeBSD, the best operating system on the planet for Intel x86 based computers (and soon Sparcs). ---- (http://www.freebsd.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe hardware" in the body of the message