Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Sep 1998 09:21:46 +0100 (BST)
From:      Duncan Barclay <dmlb@ragnet.demon.co.uk>
To:        "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Cc:        freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: "Cacheable memory"??
Message-ID:  <XFMail.980913092146.dmlb@computer.my.domain>
In-Reply-To: <199809122322.TAA00918@whizzo.transsys.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 12-Sep-98 Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> 
>> PS. In the end I went for a TX MB, at the time the only Super 7 boards were
>> MVP3 in the UK and where a bit flaky. The Tx had the advantage of being dirt
>> cheap and providing me with lots of PCI and no AGP (I have a nice Millenium
>> which would be a shame to waste).
> 
> But this only supports 64MB of (cachable) memory, right?  I'm thinking
> about picking up a K6-2 and new motherboard, and while the TX-based
> motherboards seem very popular and attractive due to the PCI slot
> count, the memory limitation is of concern to me.
> 
> louie

Thats true, but for home use 64MB is fine (well it is for me anyway), even
with Netscape and StarOffice I don't have any problems.

I forget what you are buying for, I was going to say
that if I was buying now I would go for a Ali 5 board, but I think I wouldn't
bother. I tend to change MB+CPU every couple of years, disk and other toys
are more interesting than CPU/RAM. The only reason I wanted more RAM was
Netscape.

Duncan

---
________________________________________________________________________
Duncan Barclay          | God smiles upon the little children,
dmlb@ragnet.demon.co.uk | the alcoholics, and the permanently stoned.
________________________________________________________________________

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.980913092146.dmlb>