From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jun 7 15:56:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA18590 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 15:56:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from beatrice.rutgers.edu (beatrice.rutgers.edu [165.230.209.143]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA18574 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 15:56:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu) Received: (from easmith@localhost) by beatrice.rutgers.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA11382; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 18:55:43 -0400 From: "Allen Smith" Message-Id: <9806071855.ZM11380@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 18:55:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: Luigi Rizzo "Re: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...)" (Jun 6, 2:31am) References: <199806060031.CAA12468@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Jun 6, 2:31am, Luigi Rizzo (possibly) wrote: > Allen Smith (easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu) wrote: > > OK... but documentation as to what it does would still be nice, as > > per the thing (L2-filtering-bridging) that I mentioned. Does it > > indeed do what I thought it does? > > FreeBSD does not do any L2 bridging. There are two standalone > alternatives for that, my pcbridge code (available from my web page, > romable, but only supports ed-like cards) and the drawbridge stuff > at http://drawbridge.tamu.edu/ The code from your page doesn't appear to be currently accessible, so I can't check it out. The drawbridge stuff is inadequately configurable for firewall purposes. We may be dealing with a matter of semantics/definitions here, namely in what one defines as a bridge and what one defines as a router. The arrangement I'm considering is as follows: 1. The FreeBSD machine has the proxyall sysctl on, so that it tells other machines on the two (or more) sides of it that packets meant for machines on its other interfaces should be sent to its interface. 2. It also has IP Filter running, with the fastroute code being used to override all normal routing stuff, including things such as ttl decreases. This is used to relay any packets that should be let through from one interface to the other. E.g., if machines A and B are on interface 1, and the other machines are on interface 2, then any packet that comes into interface 2 that's for machine A or machine B (and, for the firewall application - thus the L2-filtering part of the bridging - is OK by the firewall rules) gets relayed to interface 1, going out to the machine it's intended for. 3. To the viewpoint of any other machine on the network, so long as it is simply using ARP to do its Ethernet stuff, the situation is the same as before - no reconfiguration for adding a router is needed, but it's still as configurable as it would be if it were a router. Given this, it looks to me more like a L2-filtering bridge than a router. > remember, acting as a bridge puts a lot of load on a machine because > it has to listen to all traffic on all interfaces. pcbridge saves > some work by only loading to memory the header of the packet and > throwing data away if the packet must not be forwarded, but a > solution using the generic FreeBSD device drivers would almost > surely have to load the entire packet to memory before working on > it. While I have considered the load problem - a reason that the machine we've gotten for this is a P233, despite that it's only handling 2 10-Base-T lines - it isn't nearly as much of a problem as it would be without the proxyarp effectively serving as a prefilter along with the normal ethernet hardware. It only gets packets in the first place that it needs to deal with - it doesn't need to filter them out later on. This setup is essentially for the case of when you have reasons not to want to rearrange the current router et al setup. We've got internal political problems (turf battles) with doing so, others (possibly also like us) may have old routers, etcetera. There's also the advantage that if the machine breaks down or is being reconfigured, in the meantime you can simply do the connection directly - not possible with a router. -Allen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jun 7 20:11:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA14045 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 20:11:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (jonny@roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA13907; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 20:10:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA11012; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 00:10:12 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199806080310.AAA11012@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: Transparent packet diversion: Where is it? In-Reply-To: <35773444.59E2B600@whistle.com> from Julian Elischer at "Jun 4, 98 04:56:52 pm" To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 00:10:11 -0300 (EST) Cc: ghelmer@scl.ameslab.gov, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org #define quoting(Julian Elischer) // > This code mostly adds support to the ipfw interface and code to support // > two things, which are based on the same thing: // > // > * Directing INCOMING traffic that match rules to a LOCAL TCP port. // > This is intended for transparent proxying without external calls // > to a LKM, it also doesn't touch the packet, so getsockname() works // > so there's also no need for a subsequent IOCTL to work out what the // > original destination/port was. // > It's freaky seeing random remote IP's listed as "Local addresses" // > in netstat! BSD-router-speed transparent diversion... :-) // > // > * Modifying the next-hop address of OUTBOUND traffic that matches the // > rule. My intention for this is to direct web traffic from a core // > router to a transparent proxy. David Sharnoff also wanted something // > similar, and the functionality of this thus extends to doing a route // > table lookup on the specified next-hop and using the route to it, // > meaning the next-hop doesn't need to be on a directly reachable // > interface. Remember though, this code only forwards to a directly // > reachable machine! It doesn't deliver it to the specified next-hop! // > TCP port numbers are ignored if this rule comes into affect. Cool !!! When will this be added to the main source tree ? :) Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jun 7 21:34:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA28415 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 21:34:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA28383 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 21:34:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id EAA15255; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 04:57:17 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199806080257.EAA15255@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...) To: easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu (Allen Smith) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 04:57:17 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <9806071855.ZM11380@beatrice.rutgers.edu> from "Allen Smith" at Jun 7, 98 06:55:23 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The code from your page doesn't appear to be currently accessible, so > I can't check it out. The drawbridge stuff is inadequately fixed the missing link -- try again and thanks for pointing out the problem (my code is not configurable at all for firewall purposes, although it is so small and simple that it will be probably easier to write some C code to filter unwanted packets than learning a filter configuration language). > router. Given this, it looks to me more like a L2-filtering bridge > than a router. there are some differences which might not be significant in your application: * some restriction on IP addresses you can put on either side -- with a real bridge you can move machines around without changing anything (including IP address), with this setting you have to update the IP address of the machine you moved. * you must fraction your address range and configure the routing daemon on the machine acting as a bridge/router to make hosts reachable from the outside; * I am not sure how well this works with non-IP packets (e.g. we have some MAC talking ethertalk around); * nor i am sure how well this works with ethernet _and_ IP multicast and broadcast. Things like bootp might not work anymore across your gateway. > While I have considered the load problem - a reason that the machine > we've gotten for this is a P233, despite that it's only handling 2 > 10-Base-T lines - it isn't nearly as much of a problem as it would be it's more a bus than a CPU problem. We are running 5 ports on a 386-25 here using my code (of course not at full bw on all interfaces, but it can keep up with the filtering decently) but just because i don't need to move all packets to memory. cheers luigi -----------------------------+-------------------------------------- Luigi Rizzo | Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it | Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 | via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 | http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ _____________________________|______________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jun 7 22:10:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA03017 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 22:10:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from beatrice.rutgers.edu (beatrice.rutgers.edu [165.230.209.143]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA02983 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 1998 22:10:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu) Received: (from easmith@localhost) by beatrice.rutgers.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id BAA28429; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 01:09:07 -0400 From: "Allen Smith" Message-Id: <9806080109.ZM28427@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 01:09:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: Luigi Rizzo "Re: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...)" (Jun 8, 4:57am) References: <199806080257.EAA15255@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: Luigi Rizzo Subject: Re: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...) Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, net@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Jun 8, 4:57am, Luigi Rizzo (possibly) wrote: > fixed the missing link -- try again and thanks for pointing out the > problem Quite welcome. > (my code is not configurable at all for firewall purposes, > although it is so small and simple that it will be probably easier > to write some C code to filter unwanted packets than learning a > filter configuration language). Urk... I'm not much of a C programmer, so at least for now that's not a good alternative. (I say 'at least for now' since I'll eventually get replaced with an actual, professional system admin type - I'm a grad student in molecular genetics, not comp sci.) For instance, I really don't want to try recoding the 'keep state' solution in IP-Filter, which is nice for UDP for things like DNS and NTP. The same situation is probably true for other people who might be looking for a solution like this one, which is (one reason) why I've kept net@freebsd.org in the Cc:s. > there are some differences which might not be significant in your > application: > * some restriction on IP addresses you can put on > either side -- with a real bridge you can move machines around > without changing anything (including IP address), with this > setting you have to update the IP address of the machine you > moved. Yes, you do have to change the settings on the 'bridge' machine - but not on the machine being moved, unless there's something I haven't thought of. In general (and as per your second point), this method does have the problem of a more complex setup being necessary - the price you pay for configurability. > * you must fraction your address range and configure the routing > daemon on the machine acting as a bridge/router to make hosts > reachable from the outside; It's IP-Filter rules that handle it, not the routing daemon (although you could have the routing daemon doing it, at the cost of ttl decreases et al), but yes, this is a problem - see above. > * I am not sure how well this works with non-IP packets (e.g. we > have some MAC talking ethertalk around); It doesn't, at least at the present. This isn't a problem for our situation (especially since Macs and non-Unix PCs that are inside the Rutgers firewall are part of what we're trying to protect against), but admittedly might be for others. > * nor i am sure how well this works with ethernet _and_ IP multicast and > broadcast. Things like bootp might not work anymore across your > gateway. Ethernet broadcasts are supposed to be stopped by bridges, so I wouldn't consider that a problem - whether they are in this case is configurable through deciding based on what their IP layer stuff is. IP multicast and broadcast can be configured to be relayed through or not - letting it through only to whatever ports are necessary (e.g., tftp) would be possible. Admittedly, since we're not needing this functionality, there may be something here I'm not thinking of - I haven't had a cause to look into it, so I'm not as familiar with it as I might be. > it's more a bus than a CPU problem. I'll be going to PCI cards if we move to 100-Base-TX. > We are running 5 ports on a 386-25 here using my code (of course not > at full bw on all interfaces, but it can keep up with the filtering > decently) but just because i don't need to move all packets to memory. _Nice_. I'm impressed. Given that we've got some PCs around that aren't doing much (are getting replaced or whatever), I may consider using your code for doing bridging that doesn't need firewalling. In fact... it's nice for a firewall to have something resistant to sniffing between it and the rest of a network, since it might get broken into and bpf turned on... I might just stick one of those between the inner network and the firewall, running your code. Thanks, -Allen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 8 01:17:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA20037 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 01:17:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA19966 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 01:17:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id IAA15417; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 08:35:08 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199806080635.IAA15417@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...) To: easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu (Allen Smith) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 08:35:08 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <9806080109.ZM28427@beatrice.rutgers.edu> from "Allen Smith" at Jun 8, 98 01:08:47 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org as far as i can tell all your previous comments are right but... > > * nor i am sure how well this works with ethernet _and_ IP multicast and > > broadcast. Things like bootp might not work anymore across your > > gateway. > > Ethernet broadcasts are supposed to be stopped by bridges, so I no,this is not true. ethernet broadcasts and *must* be passed by L2 devices (bridges/switches). Same for multicasts, except that you can have some smarts in the bridge and snoop the control traffic (e.g. IGMP) to do selective forwarding. > > it's more a bus than a CPU problem. > > I'll be going to PCI cards if we move to 100-Base-TX. you need it even for 10Mbit, the ISA bus bandwidth is barely enough to support one loaded ethernet. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 8 03:54:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA15558 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 03:54:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mailhost.iitb.ac.in (mailhost.iitb.ac.in [202.54.44.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA15534 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 03:54:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shilpa@cse.iitb.ernet.in) Received: (qmail 28310 invoked from network); 8 Jun 1998 11:01:18 -0000 Received: from kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in (shilpa@144.16.111.2) by mailhost.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 8 Jun 1998 11:01:18 -0000 Received: (from shilpa@localhost) by kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id QAA24911 for net@FREEBSD.ORG; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 16:26:40 +0530 (IST) From: Shilpa Ashok Deshpande Message-Id: <199806081056.QAA24911@kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in> Subject: IPv6 Testing.... To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 16:26:40 +0530 (IST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hi, How can i test IPv6? I have IPv6 installed only on one linux m/c and i can't install it on any other m/c. Can anybody suggest some way of testing IPv6 connectivity with IPv6. Are there existing, well known IPv6 addresses available? Thanx in advance. shilpa --------------------------- Ms. Shilpa Deshpande. M.Tech, Dept. of Computer Science, IIT Powai, Mumbai, INDIA --------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 8 04:31:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA24785 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 04:31:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from itesec.hsc.fr (root@itesec.hsc.fr [192.70.106.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA24765 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 04:31:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pb@hsc.fr) Received: from mars.hsc.fr (mars.hsc.fr [192.70.106.44]) by itesec.hsc.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5/itesec-1.12-nospam) with ESMTP id NAA00163; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 13:31:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from pb@localhost) by mars.hsc.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8/pb-19980526) id NAA23673; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 13:31:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pb) Message-ID: <19980608133132.A23635@mars.hsc.fr> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 13:31:32 +0200 From: Pierre Beyssac To: Shilpa Ashok Deshpande , net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 Testing.... References: <199806081056.QAA24911@kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.92.8i In-Reply-To: <199806081056.QAA24911@kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in>; from Shilpa Ashok Deshpande on Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 04:26:40PM +0530 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 04:26:40PM +0530, Shilpa Ashok Deshpande wrote: > How can i test IPv6? I have IPv6 installed only on one linux > m/c and i can't install it on any other m/c. Can anybody suggest some > way of testing IPv6 connectivity with IPv6. > Are there existing, well known IPv6 addresses available? It's not clear whether you just want to test local connectivity or you want to connect to the 6bone. If the former, the localhost address is ::1 under IPv6. There are also "local" addresses (autoconfigured using the MAC address of your ethernet card) that should be shown by ifconfig or netstat (look for fe80::....). Finally, you can test the IPv4 compatibility mode with addresses in ::ffff:a.b.c.d where a.b.c.d is any IPv4 address. If you want to connect to the 6bone, see http://www-6bone.lbl.gov/6bone or more specifically http://www-6bone.lbl.gov/6bone/6bone_hookup.html -- Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 8 04:38:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA26032 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 04:38:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from coconut.itojun.org (root@coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA26011 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 04:38:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from localhost (itojun@localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.8.8+3.0Wbeta12/3.6W) with ESMTP id UAA15660; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 20:38:09 +0900 (JST) To: Shilpa Ashok Deshpande cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: shilpa's message of Mon, 08 Jun 1998 16:26:40 +0530. <199806081056.QAA24911@kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: IPv6 Testing.... From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 20:38:08 +0900 Message-ID: <15656.897305888@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > How can i test IPv6? I have IPv6 installed only on one linux >m/c and i can't install it on any other m/c. Can anybody suggest some what do you mean by dm/c? anyway, visit any of the following places to grab implementation for FreeBSD, BSDI or NetBSD: http://www.kame.net/ ftp://ftp.inria.fr/network/ipv6/ ftp://utopia.hacktic.nl/pub/replay/pub/crypto/IPv6/ >way of testing IPv6 connectivity with IPv6. > Are there existing, well known IPv6 addresses available? see http://www.6one.net/ itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 8 07:58:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA26521 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 07:58:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from assurance ([206.29.49.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA26479 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 07:58:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tskjei@rstcorp.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by assurance (8.7.5/8.6.9) id KAA28226 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 10:54:47 -0400 Received: from sandbox.rstcorp.com(206.29.49.63) by assurance.rstcorp.com via smap (V2.0) id xma028220; Mon, 8 Jun 98 10:54:34 -0400 Received: (from tskjei@localhost) by sandbox.rstcorp.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA02838; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 10:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 10:57:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom C. Skjei" To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Bettering NFS Performance Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I'm looking for tips on how to increase the performance on a FreeBSD host dedicated entirely to providing NFS services. More specifically, this box runs FreeBSD 2.2.6-Beta, has a Pentium II (233 Mhz) cpu, two 9 Gb scsi drives, 128 Mb of RAM, and an Intel EtherExpress Pro/100+ PCI network card. For the most part, the cpu is idle, and I want to configure it to make full use of all its unused resources. I imagine this will entail making some changes to its cache size, the number of nfsd daemons, etc. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, TOm SKjei To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 8 15:40:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA26832 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 15:40:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from network-services.uoregon.edu (network-services.uoregon.edu [128.223.60.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA26776 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 15:40:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kurtw@network-services.uoregon.edu) Received: from peabody. (peabody.uoregon.edu [128.223.163.125]) by network-services.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA15903 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 15:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by peabody. (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA03329; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 15:36:08 -0700 Message-Id: <199806082236.PAA03329@peabody.> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-network@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: DHCP on PCMCIA interfaces X-url: http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/~kurtw/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 15:31:56 -0700 From: Kurt Joseph Windisch Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Is anyone running the ISC v2 DHCP client (dhclient) over PCMCIA LAN interfaces? I've got a 3C389D configured and working with FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE. The interface gets configured by pccardd and does not have link until you ifconfig it. However, the way I understand it, you're supposed to be able to run dhclient without ifconfig'ing. But when I do this ('dhclient ep0') I get an error 'dhcleint: ep0: not found'. Any experiences out there with DCHP and PCCard interfaces? --Kurt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 9 06:27:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA19726 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 06:27:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nl-mail-dmz.cmg-gecis.nl (nl-mail-dmz.cmg-gecis.nl [195.109.155.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA19674; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 06:27:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl) Received: from nl-amv-mail01.atf.cmg.nl (10.16.66.200) by nl-mail-dmz.cmg-gecis.nl (Integralis SMTPRS 1.51) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 09 Jun 1998 13:20:14 +0200 Received: from MCR2 by nl-amv-mail01.atf.cmg.nl with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1458.49) id K77NJXT9; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 13:20:00 +0200 Message-Id: <357D1B8C.43A05D9C@cmg.nl> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 13:25:00 +0200 From: Mike Crawfurd Organization: CMG Advanced Technologies Rotterdam X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: AMD PCNet family PCI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear FreeBSD Gods, I've got a problem (which I posted before) with the AMD PCNet family network adapter. I've got a compaq deskpro 575 with and AMD PCNET Family Ethernet Adapter (PCI&ISA). I've installed FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE now, but still the same errors waste my oh-so-beautiful console. I'm trying to configure the network card (AMD PCNET), but got the following problem... The network adapter is according to specifications a lnc adapter (FreeBSD agrees with me :-) I think) When configuring the kernel two things occur: The network adapter is found twice (always nice) -- With the PCI detection (a paste follows) Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1 rev 22 int a irq 11 on pci0:11 Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1: NE2100 (C-LANCE) address 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba Really nice huh :-) But again the card is detected by ISA (happy happy joy joy) -- and with ISA detection (a paste follows) Jun 3 09:52:00 asig /kernel: lnc0 at 0x1000-0x1017 irq 11 drq 0 on eisa slot 1 Jun 3 09:52:00 asig /kernel: lnc0: NE2100 (C-LANCE) address 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba I'm overjoyed with pleasure of irq conflicts, I thought my joy would never end BUT ... then I looked with ifconfig -a AND again I find I have two network adapters for the price of one. lnc1: flags=802 mtu 1500 ether 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba lp0: bla bla lnc0: flags=803 mtu 1500 inet 172.24.5.36 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 172.24.2.1 ether 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba bla bla bla I've configured the lnc0 (the ISA version) with ifconfig, but got a beautiful "Initialisation failed" error-code back. After rebooting and changing the /etc/rc.conf, I've tried to configure the PCI version but again the same error-code is scrolling over my almost-never-containing-any-error-console... I've tried everything that comes to my mind (and believe me.. I may not be smart, but very resourceful). The following tries were made: Disabling the entire PCI bus (in the kernel, making it impossible for PCI to detect the card) but again the ISA version gives the Initialisation failed Disabling the ISA card (in the kernel, just configurating the lnc0 ISA driver) but then the PCI version gives the Initialisation failed Can someone tell me what I've done wrong ? I think the card is BOTH ISA and PCI, this seems to bother FreeBSD alot (and by bothering FreeBSD it's bothering me even more). Is there a hot fix/sneaky dirty solution to this problem ? Or am I missing something :-) Personally I want to throw out this worthless piece of computing, but since I usually strew up settings, operating systems, hosts, etc. there probebly is a safe and simple solution to this problem. I've managed to give the adapter his own IP number (172.24.5.36), and this one is pingable (strange huh)... I've tried to add some routes, default routes, (basically everything that comes to mind) configging the card until I dropped... Error in network (e.g. 172.24.5.*) -> network is down But since I have lnc0 AND lnc1 it's really confusing for a "newbie" to networking... Can someone please help me with this poor excuse for a network adapter ? I really don't know what to do at this point since I don't know if my experience with networking is lacking OR the network card is not supported making it impossible for me to ever configure the adapter right. I appriciate all the help I could get... TIA & TTUL, Mike Crawfurd. Mike Crawfurd Telephone. (+31) 10 253 7000 CMG Advanced Technologies Industries Telefax. (+31) 10 253 7033 Kralingseweg 241, 3062 CE Rotterdam Mobile. (+31) 65 534 7574 The Netherlands Email. mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 9 11:14:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA28430 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:14:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alcatel.fr (news2.alcatel.fr [194.133.58.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA28159; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:13:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr) From: THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr Received: from alcatel.fr (gatekeeper-ssn.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.244]) by mailgate.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP.9.9.9) with ESMTP id QAA19447; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16:56:48 +0200 Received: from aifhs1.alcatel.fr (aifhs1.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.86]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id QAA03498; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16:46:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aifhs1.alcatel.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA12759; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16:49:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id QAA03477; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16:45:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA01110; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16:46:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from telspace.alcatel.fr by telss1 (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA05753; Tue, 9 Jun 98 16:35:29 +0200 Received: from localhost by telspace.alcatel.fr with SMTP (1.40.112.12/16.2) id AA247892706; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16:31:46 +0200 X-Openmail-Hops: 1 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 98 16:31:36 +0200 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <357D1B8C.43A05D9C@cmg.nl> Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9p_:_AMD_PCNet_family_PCI?= Mime-Version: 1.0 To: mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; name="AMD" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="AMD" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id LAA28239 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org what if you disable the probe on the ISA bus (first with a visual config while booting, then and if the first way doesn't make it, removing the lnc0 entry from your config file ?) ____________________________ Séparateur Réponse ________________________________ Objet : AMD PCNet family PCI Auteur : mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl Date : 09/06/98 13:25 Dear FreeBSD Gods, I've got a problem (which I posted before) with the AMD PCNet family network adapter. I've got a compaq deskpro 575 with and AMD PCNET Family Ethernet Adapter (PCI&ISA). I've installed FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE now, but still the same errors waste my oh-so-beautiful console. I'm trying to configure the network card (AMD PCNET), but got the following problem... The network adapter is according to specifications a lnc adapter (FreeBSD agrees with me :-) I think) When configuring the kernel two things occur: The network adapter is found twice (always nice) -- With the PCI detection (a paste follows) Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1 rev 22 int a irq 11 on pci0:11 Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1: NE2100 (C-LANCE) address 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba Really nice huh :-) But again the card is detected by ISA (happy happy joy joy) -- and with ISA detection (a paste follows) Jun 3 09:52:00 asig /kernel: lnc0 at 0x1000-0x1017 irq 11 drq 0 on eisa slot 1 Jun 3 09:52:00 asig /kernel: lnc0: NE2100 (C-LANCE) address 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba I'm overjoyed with pleasure of irq conflicts, I thought my joy would never end BUT ... then I looked with ifconfig -a AND again I find I have two network adapters for the price of one. lnc1: flags=802 mtu 1500 ether 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba lp0: bla bla lnc0: flags=803 mtu 1500 inet 172.24.5.36 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 172.24.2.1 ether 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba bla bla bla I've configured the lnc0 (the ISA version) with ifconfig, but got a beautiful "Initialisation failed" error-code back. After rebooting and changing the /etc/rc.conf, I've tried to configure the PCI version but again the same error-code is scrolling over my almost-never-containing-any-error-console... I've tried everything that comes to my mind (and believe me.. I may not be smart, but very resourceful). The following tries were made: Disabling the entire PCI bus (in the kernel, making it impossible for PCI to detect the card) but again the ISA version gives the Initialisation failed Disabling the ISA card (in the kernel, just configurating the lnc0 ISA driver) but then the PCI version gives the Initialisation failed Can someone tell me what I've done wrong ? I think the card is BOTH ISA and PCI, this seems to bother FreeBSD alot (and by bothering FreeBSD it's bothering me even more). Is there a hot fix/sneaky dirty solution to this problem ? Or am I missing something :-) Personally I want to throw out this worthless piece of computing, but since I usually strew up settings, operating systems, hosts, etc. there probebly is a safe and simple solution to this problem. I've managed to give the adapter his own IP number (172.24.5.36), and this one is pingable (strange huh)... I've tried to add some routes, default routes, (basically everything that comes to mind) configging the card until I dropped... Error in network (e.g. 172.24.5.*) -> network is down But since I have lnc0 AND lnc1 it's really confusing for a "newbie" to networking... Can someone please help me with this poor excuse for a network adapter ? I really don't know what to do at this point since I don't know if my experience with networking is lacking OR the network card is not supported making it impossible for me to ever configure the adapter right. I appriciate all the help I could get... TIA & TTUL, Mike Crawfurd. Mike Crawfurd Telephone. (+31) 10 253 7000 CMG Advanced Technologies Industries Telefax. (+31) 10 253 7033 Kralingseweg 241, 3062 CE Rotterdam Mobile. (+31) 65 534 7574 The Netherlands Email. mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 9 13:09:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA23144 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 13:09:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gw.jmrodgers.com (gw.jmrodgers.com [205.247.224.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA23081 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 13:09:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from meuston@jmrodgers.com) Received: from max.jmrodgers.com (max.jmrodgers.com [205.247.224.209]) by gw.jmrodgers.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA14638 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16:08:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from meuston@jmrodgers.com) Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16:08:51 -0400 Message-ID: <01BD93C0.E4EA34C0.meuston@jmrodgers.com> From: Max Euston To: "'FreeBSD Net'" Subject: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 16:08:49 -0400 Organization: J.M. Rodgers Co., Inc. X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I got this is my system log (on my firewall): Jun 8 13:02:03 gw /kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400 FreeBSD gw.jmrodgers.com 2.2.5-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE #0: Tue Mar 3 14:20:05 EST 1998 admin@mail.jmrodgers.com:/var/src/sys/compile/GATEWAY i386 It is from '/sys/netinet/in_rmx.c'. It appears to be a timeout adjustment (from 3600 to 2400 seconds) for keeping the routing tables below a certain size (128 entries). There were no other log entries in the 2 hours before or the 2 hours after this message. I ran (_much_ later than the log entry) 'netstat -arn' and only see 41 entries (all of which I recognize). I am _not_ running 'routed' (but I do run 'gated'). The internal machines are Unix and Win/95. Any ideas why this happened? Thanks... Max (who is extremely paranoid these days) --- Max Euston To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 9 14:48:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA11760 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from brooklyn.slack.net (root@brooklyn.slack.net [206.41.21.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA11685; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 14:48:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from townsend@brooklyn.slack.net) Received: (from townsend@localhost) by brooklyn.slack.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA25399; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 17:49:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Townsend Message-Id: <199806092149.RAA25399@brooklyn.slack.net> Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9p?= : AMD PCNet family PCIul Koning (52) Re: linux-ipsec: More useless error In-Reply-To: from "THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr" at "Jun 9, 98 04:31:36 pm" To: THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 17:49:57 -0400 (EDT) Cc: mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 9 21:45:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA19176 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 21:45:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mailhost.iitb.ac.in (mailhost.iitb.ac.in [202.54.44.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA19151 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 21:45:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shilpa@cse.iitb.ernet.in) Received: (qmail 23188 invoked from network); 10 Jun 1998 04:52:08 -0000 Received: from kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in (shilpa@144.16.111.2) by mailhost.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 10 Jun 1998 04:52:08 -0000 Received: (from shilpa@localhost) by kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id KAA20141 for freebsd-net@FREEBSD.ORG; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 10:17:32 +0530 (IST) From: Shilpa Ashok Deshpande Message-Id: <199806100447.KAA20141@kailash.cse.iitb.ernet.in> Subject: IPv6 config.... To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 10:17:31 +0530 (IST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hi, I need some help on the following: I want to configure my Linux m/c for v6/v4 host. How can i go about it? I have installed IPv6 on it. From where can i get IPv6 address? How can i test IPv6? shilpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 10 00:57:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA22061 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 00:57:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nl-mail-dmz.cmg-gecis.nl (nl-mail-dmz.cmg-gecis.nl [195.109.155.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA22038; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 00:57:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl) Received: from nl-amv-mail01.atf.cmg.nl (10.16.66.200) by nl-mail-dmz.cmg-gecis.nl (Integralis SMTPRS 1.51) with ESMTP id ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:38:53 +0200 Received: from MCR2 by nl-amv-mail01.atf.cmg.nl with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1458.49) id K77NKMWR; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:38:40 +0200 Message-Id: <357E3932.F702FCE5@cmg.nl> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:43:46 +0200 From: Mike Crawfurd Organization: CMG Advanced Technologies Rotterdam X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Rép : AMD PCNet family PCI References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear Thierry, THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr wrote: > what if you disable the probe on the ISA bus (first with a visual config while > booting, then and if the first way doesn't make it, removing the lnc0 entry from > your config file ?) Tried that already :-) I'll paste my various config(8): try #1 (both adapters): controller isa0 controller pci0 device lnc0 at isa? port 0x1000 net irq 11 drq 0 vector lncintr try #2 (only pci adapter #1): controller isa0 controller pci0 try #3 (only isa adapter): controller isa0 device lnc0 at isa? port 0x1000 net irq 11 drq 0 vector lncintr try #4 (only pci adapter #2): controller isa0 controller pci0 device lnc0 try #5 (only pci adapter #3): controller isa0 controller pci0 device lnc0 at isa? disable I think maybe the driver is incorrect ? Tried to read it ... but don't understand it completly :-) (actually I don't understand it at all) The network adapter worked fine under winddoos (yeah yeah I know it sux...) Mike. ________________________________ > Objet : AMD PCNet family PCI > Auteur : mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl > Date : 09/06/98 13:25 > > Dear FreeBSD Gods, > > I've got a problem (which I posted before) with the AMD PCNet family > network adapter. I've got a compaq deskpro 575 with and AMD PCNET Family > Ethernet Adapter (PCI&ISA). I've installed FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE now, > but still the same errors waste my oh-so-beautiful console. > > I'm trying to configure the network card (AMD PCNET), but got the > following problem... The network adapter is according to specifications > a lnc adapter > (FreeBSD agrees with me :-) I think) > > When configuring the kernel two things occur: > The network adapter is found twice (always nice) > -- With the PCI detection (a paste follows) > Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1 rev 22 > int a irq 11 on pci0:11 > Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1: NE2100 (C-LANCE) address > 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba > > Really nice huh :-) > > But again the card is detected by ISA (happy happy joy joy) > -- and with ISA detection (a paste follows) > Jun 3 09:52:00 asig /kernel: lnc0 at 0x1000-0x1017 irq 11 drq 0 on eisa > slot 1 > Jun 3 09:52:00 asig /kernel: lnc0: NE2100 (C-LANCE) address > 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba > > I'm overjoyed with pleasure of irq conflicts, I thought my joy would > never end BUT ... > then I looked with ifconfig -a AND again I find I have two network > adapters for the price of one. > > lnc1: flags=802 mtu 1500 ether 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba > lp0: bla bla > lnc0: flags=803 mtu 1500 > inet 172.24.5.36 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 172.24.2.1 > ether 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba > bla bla bla > > I've configured the lnc0 (the ISA version) with ifconfig, but got a > beautiful "Initialisation failed" error-code back. After rebooting and > changing the /etc/rc.conf, I've tried to configure the PCI version but > again the same error-code is scrolling over my > almost-never-containing-any-error-console... > > I've tried everything that comes to my mind (and believe me.. I may not > be smart, but very resourceful). > The following tries were made: > > Disabling the entire PCI bus (in the kernel, making it impossible for > PCI to detect the card) > but again the ISA version gives the Initialisation failed > > Disabling the ISA card (in the kernel, just configurating the lnc0 ISA > driver) > but then the PCI version gives the Initialisation failed > > Can someone tell me what I've done wrong ? > I think the card is BOTH ISA and PCI, this seems to bother FreeBSD alot > (and by bothering FreeBSD it's bothering me even more). > Is there a hot fix/sneaky dirty solution to this problem ? Or am I > missing something :-) > > Personally I want to throw out this worthless piece of computing, but > since I usually strew up settings, operating systems, hosts, etc. there > probebly is a safe and simple solution to this problem. > > I've managed to give the adapter his own IP number (172.24.5.36), and > this one is pingable (strange huh)... I've tried to add some routes, > default routes, (basically everything that comes to mind) configging the > card until I dropped... > > Error in network (e.g. 172.24.5.*) -> network is down > But since I have lnc0 AND lnc1 it's really confusing for a "newbie" to > networking... > Can someone please help me with this poor excuse for a network adapter ? > > I really don't know what to do at this point since I don't know if my > experience with networking is lacking OR the network card is not > supported making it impossible for me to ever configure the adapter > right. > > > I appriciate all the help I could get... > -- TIA & TTUL, Mike Crawfurd. Mike Crawfurd Telephone. (+31) 10 253 7000 CMG Advanced Technologies Industries Telefax. (+31) 10 253 7033 Kralingseweg 241, 3062 CE Rotterdam Mobile. (+31) 65 534 7574 The Netherlands Email. mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 10 01:54:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA01569 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 01:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (arthur.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.5.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA01551 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk) Received: from rambo (actually rambo.futures.bt.co.uk) by arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (PP) with SMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:51:27 +0100 Received: from maczebedee (actually macsmtp) by rambo with SMTP (PP); Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:52:53 +0100 Message-ID: Date: 10 Jun 1998 09:51:53 +0100 From: Graeme Brown Subject: SVC support for FreeBSD ATM Networking To: Kenjiro Cho Cc: "FreeBSD-Net (FreeBSD.Org) List" , Richard Macey X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP for Quarterdeck Mail; Version 4.0.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear KJ I wondered if you know of anyone working on SVC setup capabilities for FreeBSD ATM networking for Adaptec or ENI cards ? TIA Graeme N Brown Internet Futures Team BT Laboratories, UK email: graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 10 04:03:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA29511 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 04:03:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from widefw.csl.sony.co.jp (widefw.csl.sony.co.jp [133.138.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA29448 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 04:03:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kjc@csl.sony.co.jp) Received: from hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (root@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp [43.27.98.57]) by widefw.csl.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.6W) with ESMTP id UAA17962; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 20:03:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (kjc@[127.0.0.1]) by hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.6W/hotaka/98021914) with ESMTP id UAA27600; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 20:03:02 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199806101103.UAA27600@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> To: Graeme Brown cc: "FreeBSD-Net (FreeBSD.Org) List" , Richard Macey Subject: Re: SVC support for FreeBSD ATM Networking In-reply-to: Your message of "10 Jun 1998 09:51:53 +0100." Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 20:03:02 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> I wondered if you know of anyone working on SVC setup capabilities >> for FreeBSD ATM networking for Adaptec or ENI cards ? Take a look at HARP2 that works with ENI cards. --Kenjiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 10 04:51:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA09633 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 04:51:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from widefw.csl.sony.co.jp (widefw.csl.sony.co.jp [133.138.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA09620 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 04:51:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kjc@csl.sony.co.jp) Received: from hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (root@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp [43.27.98.57]) by widefw.csl.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.6W) with ESMTP id UAA18150 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 20:51:12 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (kjc@[127.0.0.1]) by hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.6W/hotaka/98021914) with ESMTP id UAA29476 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 20:51:11 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199806101151.UAA29476@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: altq for ppp Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 20:51:11 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've been porting ALTQ/CBQ onto the userland ppp. Although the code needs to be cleaned up a bit more, I've decided to make a snapshot release for discussion at USENIX. It's available from: ftp://ftp.csl.sony.co.jp/pub/kjc/altq4ppp-0.1.tar.gz ---Kenjiro >From README: altq4ppp -- version 0.1 June 10, 1998 This release is a port of ALTQ (kernel version) to the userland ppp (aka iij-ppp). Since the bottleneck of ppp is the serial link (not the tun interface), alternative queueing is implemented within the ppp program. This release is an alpha version and is not for general users but to ask for comments and suggestions. Testers are supposed to have control of both ends of a dialup link. This version supports CBQ and is intended to be used at the server side (upstream side) of a dialup link (the current implementation controls only outgoing packets). The ppp part is based on the verion in FreeBSD-2.2.6-RELEASE. Features: - a queueing framework as a userland program. - supports CBQ that controls the bandwidth use of hierarchically configured classes. - RED can be enabled on a class queue basis to keep the queue length short. - the native firewall mechanism is enhanced in order to work as a CBQ classifier. There are several reasons why I made altq4ppp. - traffic management is more effective and easier on a slow link. (why not to do it?) - it's a shame that I have a poor dialup connection from home... (I already showed that ALTQ works for 100Mbps, now it's time to fix my everyday life!) - to promote traffic management to those who are frustrated by their dialup links. (yes, we can do much better!) - promote traffic management: a userland implementation is much easier for many people to try out. - as a user program, it is easier for me to experiment with new ideas. - to evaluate the algorithmic details of a queueing discipline. (a slow link makes the measurement tools have finer relative granularity.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 10 08:46:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA28651 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 08:46:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gw.jmrodgers.com (gw.jmrodgers.com [205.247.224.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA28527 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 08:45:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from meuston@jmrodgers.com) Received: from max.jmrodgers.com (max.jmrodgers.com [205.247.224.209]) by gw.jmrodgers.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA20055 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 11:45:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from meuston@jmrodgers.com) Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 11:45:13 -0400 Message-ID: <01BD9465.3AF9D060.meuston@jmrodgers.com> From: Max Euston To: "'FreeBSD Net'" Subject: RE: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 11:45:11 -0400 Organization: J.M. Rodgers Co., Inc. X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Sorry for the wasted bandwidth (including this message :-)). I went "right to the source". I should have checked the archives (I don't track -questions). Baaad boy . Max --- Max Euston To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 10 22:21:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA22043 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 22:21:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (castles69.castles.com [208.214.165.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA22020; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 22:21:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@antipodes.cdrom.com) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antipodes.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA00557; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 21:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806110416.VAA00557@antipodes.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Mike Crawfurd cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AMD PCNet family PCI In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Jun 1998 13:25:00 +0200." <357D1B8C.43A05D9C@cmg.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 21:16:24 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I've got a problem (which I posted before) with the AMD PCNet family > network adapter. I've got a compaq deskpro 575 with and AMD PCNET Family > Ethernet Adapter (PCI&ISA). I've installed FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE now, > but still the same errors waste my oh-so-beautiful console. It's not "PCI & ISA". It's PCI only. > I'm trying to configure the network card (AMD PCNET), but got the > following problem... The network adapter is according to specifications > a lnc adapter > (FreeBSD agrees with me :-) I think) Yes, it should be supported, but there are problems with this driver and newer PCNet devices. > When configuring the kernel two things occur: > The network adapter is found twice (always nice) > -- With the PCI detection (a paste follows) > Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1 rev 22 > int a irq 11 on pci0:11 > Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1: NE2100 (C-LANCE) address > 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba > > Really nice huh :-) > > But again the card is detected by ISA (happy happy joy joy) You should disable the ISA version of the device. The two will conflict. > I've configured the lnc0 (the ISA version) with ifconfig, but got a > beautiful "Initialisation failed" error-code back. After rebooting and > changing the /etc/rc.conf, I've tried to configure the PCI version but > again the same error-code is scrolling over my > almost-never-containing-any-error-console... This is a known problem with the driver. It needs someone to sit down with one of these devices and the hardware documentation and fix it. The LANCE family is large, and relatively complex, but well-documented. This would be an excellent first-time hardware hacker project. If anyone would like to attempt this, I can provide documentation and one or more sample cards. I have asked the original maintainer of the driver (Paul Richards) about this, but received no response. 8( > Can someone tell me what I've done wrong ? > I think the card is BOTH ISA and PCI, this seems to bother FreeBSD alot > (and by bothering FreeBSD it's bothering me even more). No; PCI and ISA share the same address space on the PC. It's the same device, you're just looking for it in two different ways. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 11 01:54:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA24193 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 01:54:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nl-mail-dmz.cmg-gecis.nl (nl-mail-dmz.cmg-gecis.nl [195.109.155.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA24127; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 01:54:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl) Received: from nl-amv-mail01.atf.cmg.nl (10.16.66.200) by nl-mail-dmz.cmg-gecis.nl (Integralis SMTPRS 1.51) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:53:53 +0200 Received: from MCR2 by nl-amv-mail01.atf.cmg.nl with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1458.49) id MWSGF8JY; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:53:31 +0200 Message-Id: <357F9C42.E6CFB191@cmg.nl> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:58:42 +0200 From: Mike Crawfurd Organization: CMG Advanced Technologies Rotterdam X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Smith , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AMD PCNet family PCI References: <199806110416.VAA00557@antipodes.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have tried the following config(8)'s: Situation 1) (just pci was found) controller isa0 controller pci0 device lnc0 Situation 2) (just isa was found) controller isa0 device lnc0 at isa? port 0x1000 net irq 11 drq 0 vector lncintr Situation 3) (both were found) controller isa0 controller pci0 device lnc0 at isa? port 0x1000 net irq 11 drq 0 vector lncintr Situation 4) (just pci) controller isa0 controller pci0 device lnc0 at isa? disabled None were succesful Mike Smith wrote: > > > I've got a problem (which I posted before) with the AMD PCNet family > > network adapter. I've got a compaq deskpro 575 with and AMD PCNET Family > > Ethernet Adapter (PCI&ISA). I've installed FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE now, > > but still the same errors waste my oh-so-beautiful console. > > It's not "PCI & ISA". It's PCI only. > > > I'm trying to configure the network card (AMD PCNET), but got the > > following problem... The network adapter is according to specifications > > a lnc adapter > > (FreeBSD agrees with me :-) I think) > > Yes, it should be supported, but there are problems with this driver > and newer PCNet devices. > > > When configuring the kernel two things occur: > > The network adapter is found twice (always nice) > > -- With the PCI detection (a paste follows) > > Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1 rev 22 > > int a irq 11 on pci0:11 > > Jun 3 09:51:59 asig /kernel: lnc1: NE2100 (C-LANCE) address > > 00:80:5f:8a:28:ba > > > > Really nice huh :-) > > > > But again the card is detected by ISA (happy happy joy joy) > > You should disable the ISA version of the device. The two will > conflict. > > > I've configured the lnc0 (the ISA version) with ifconfig, but got a > > beautiful "Initialisation failed" error-code back. After rebooting and > > changing the /etc/rc.conf, I've tried to configure the PCI version but > > again the same error-code is scrolling over my > > almost-never-containing-any-error-console... > > This is a known problem with the driver. It needs someone to sit down > with one of these devices and the hardware documentation and fix it. > The LANCE family is large, and relatively complex, but well-documented. > > This would be an excellent first-time hardware hacker project. If > anyone would like to attempt this, I can provide documentation and one > or more sample cards. I have asked the original maintainer of the > driver (Paul Richards) about this, but received no response. 8( > > > Can someone tell me what I've done wrong ? > > I think the card is BOTH ISA and PCI, this seems to bother FreeBSD alot > > (and by bothering FreeBSD it's bothering me even more). > > No; PCI and ISA share the same address space on the PC. It's the same > device, you're just looking for it in two different ways. > > -- > \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith > \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au > \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org > \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com -- TIA & TTUL, Mike Crawfurd. Mike Crawfurd Telephone. (+31) 10 253 7000 CMG Advanced Technologies Industries Telefax. (+31) 10 253 7033 Kralingseweg 241, 3062 CE Rotterdam Mobile. (+31) 65 534 7574 The Netherlands Email. mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 12 02:14:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA17553 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 02:14:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from avrasya.ispro.net.tr (avrasya.ispro.net.tr [195.174.18.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA17417 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 02:14:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net.tr) Received: from localhost (yurtesen@localhost) by avrasya.ispro.net.tr (8.8.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA22951 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 13:20:20 +0300 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 13:20:20 +0300 (EET DST) From: Evren Yurtesen To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: telnet-ftp Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hello I want to limit ftp users by domain... I mean I just want my users to be able to use my ftp server... the same for telnet accounts, I do not want other people to connect to my machine thru telnet from another domain... how may I do this? thank you Evren +--------------------------------------------------------+ | Name : Evren Yurtesen - yurtesen@ispro.net.tr | | S-mail: Mithatpasa Cad. No:1079/13 35290 Guzelyali | | Home:+90-232-2857604 Work:+90-232-2463992 Izmir/TURKEY | +--------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 12 03:31:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA07047 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 03:31:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from avrasya.ispro.net.tr (avrasya.ispro.net.tr [195.174.18.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA06889; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 03:30:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net.tr) Received: from localhost (yurtesen@localhost) by avrasya.ispro.net.tr (8.8.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA23965; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 14:36:42 +0300 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 14:36:42 +0300 (EET DST) From: Evren Yurtesen To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: telnet Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hello I want to restrict telnet access to my domain only... I mean only people from my domain should be able to access to my server via telnet. how may I restrict it in Freebsd? it was so easy when I was using linux, there was hosts.deny and hosts.allow files... or do linux has this as an advantage to freebsd? thank you Evren +--------------------------------------------------------+ | Name : Evren Yurtesen - yurtesen@ispro.net.tr | | S-mail: Mithatpasa Cad. No:1079/13 35290 Guzelyali | | Home:+90-232-2857604 Work:+90-232-2463992 Izmir/TURKEY | +--------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 12 06:49:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA11284 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 06:49:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cyclone.degnet.baynet.de (www.degnet.baynet.de [194.95.214.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA11245; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 06:48:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from malte@webmore.com) Received: from neuron.webmore.com (unverified [194.95.214.180]) by cyclone.degnet.baynet.de (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 15:49:54 +0200 Received: from neuron.webmore.de (malte@webmore.com) by neuron.webmore.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01113; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 15:46:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 15:46:00 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: malte@webmore.com From: Malte Lance To: Evren Yurtesen Subject: RE: telnet Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 12-Jun-98 Evren Yurtesen wrote: > hello > > I want to restrict telnet access to my domain only... > I mean only people from my domain should be able to > access to my server via telnet. > how may I restrict it in Freebsd? Have a look at ipfw > it was so easy when I was using linux, there was > hosts.deny and hosts.allow files... This are security-wormholes > or do linux has this as an advantage to freebsd? Is this a threat ??? Malte. > > thank you > Evren > > +--------------------------------------------------------+ >| Name : Evren Yurtesen - yurtesen@ispro.net.tr | >| S-mail: Mithatpasa Cad. No:1079/13 35290 Guzelyali | >| Home:+90-232-2857604 Work:+90-232-2463992 Izmir/TURKEY | > +--------------------------------------------------------+ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Malte Lance Date: 12-Jun-98 Time: 15:12:23 ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 12 09:08:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA09246 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 09:08:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.seidata.com (ns1.seidata.com [208.10.211.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA09188; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 09:08:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@seidata.com) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by ns1.seidata.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA19170; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 11:07:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 11:07:50 -0500 (EST) From: Mike To: Evren Yurtesen cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: telnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > I want to restrict telnet access to my domain only... /etc/login.access. i would suggest looking into something like Wietse's tcp wrappers (ftp.win.tue.nl, i believe). > or do linux has this as an advantage to freebsd? i'm sure every OS has some advantages and some disadvantages. which one you choose and work with is based upon personal preferences and attitude. as with most things in unix, there is more than one way to do what you are attempting. what makes one way better or worse will vary in the eyes of different people. -mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 12 09:25:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA13442 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 09:25:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (s205m64.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA13216; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 09:24:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA08686; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 09:23:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 09:23:19 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199806121623.JAA08686@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, yurtesen@ispro.net.tr Subject: Re: telnet Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 14:36:42 +0300 (EET DST) >From: Evren Yurtesen >I want to restrict telnet access to my domain only... >I mean only people from my domain should be able to >access to my server via telnet. >how may I restrict it in Freebsd? See /usr/ports/security/tcp_wrapper/*. >it was so easy when I was using linux, there was >hosts.deny and hosts.allow files... Yeah, those are files that TCP Wrappers uses. Actually, the port builds tcpwrappers with the -DPROCESS_OPTIONS, so you only need one of those files, and you get a lot more flexiblity. >or do linux has this as an advantage to freebsd? Not that I can tell.... david -- David Wolfskill UNIX System Administrator dhw@whistle.com voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (650) 371-4621 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 12 13:50:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA10705 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 13:50:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ranma.nectar.com (c019.n.communique.net [204.27.67.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA10600; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 13:49:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@ranma.nectar.com) Received: from ranma.nectar.com (localhost.communique.net [127.0.0.1]) by ranma.nectar.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA22690; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 15:45:35 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199806122045.PAA22690@ranma.nectar.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 X-PGP-RSAfprint: 00 F9 E6 A2 C5 4D 0A 76 26 8B 8B 57 73 D0 DE EE X-PGP-RSAkey: http://pgp.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x094724A9 From: Jacques Vidrine In-reply-to: References: Subject: Re: telnet To: Mike cc: Evren Yurtesen , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 15:45:35 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Not to mention that this is an application-level thing, not an operating system thing ... Jacques Vidrine On 12 June 1998 at 11:07, Mike wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > > > I want to restrict telnet access to my domain only... > > /etc/login.access. i would suggest looking into something like > Wietse's tcp wrappers (ftp.win.tue.nl, i believe). > > > or do linux has this as an advantage to freebsd? > > i'm sure every OS has some advantages and some disadvantages. which one > you choose and work with is based upon personal preferences and attitude. > as with most things in unix, there is more than one way to do what you are > attempting. what makes one way better or worse will vary in the eyes of > different people. > > -mike > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNYGTbzeRhT8JRySpAQELkwP+JiGua5NdvHe+Qh9ky0Cy06XSVww9sbGY owSiZY5elbLVX1yHWUUacUpwwa/Jyk6TR7QWJZeiD4kIejJVqFrFSKD7wZAqp7BC bIve3/nW9t1vhV8RHvLscN4ED64D84fNOTbOCqhxi/ONCB5otvfIVf3cN9z6YTjM 3JDGNhVRupo= =F7R6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message