From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 03:46:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA03368 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 03:46:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gaia.coppe.ufrj.br (cisigw.coppe.ufrj.br [146.164.5.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA03363 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 03:46:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonny@coppe.ufrj.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by gaia.coppe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA12966; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 08:46:44 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199803011146.IAA12966@gaia.coppe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server In-Reply-To: <002401bd431b$9e9d7860$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> from Evan Champion at "Feb 26, 98 08:04:13 pm" To: evanc@synapse.net (Evan Champion) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 08:46:44 -0300 (EST) Cc: jonny@coppe.ufrj.br, viren@rstcorp.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk #define quoting(Evan Champion) // >A big problem you'll find with FreeBSD as a NFS server is that its // >rpc.lockd is a fake. It'll always answer "Ok" to requesting clients, // >but it'll never make a real file lock. This is specially bad if you // >plan to mount your mail directory over NFS. // // Run qmail with maildirs; then even if you can't lock, delivering mail over // NFS is safe. Delivery is local in all my installations. My concern is with reading. I've already lost some mailboxes because sendmail delivered mail while elm was rewriting the mailbox over NFS. Probably I should use some other approach, but is not easy to tell the users that they must log onto one specific computer just to read mail, or that they must use pop to read it when they're in the same network. I really hope that NFS locking comes to FreeBSD in the very near future. Now that Terry's changes are being slowly commited, there's a bigger chance. :) Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br +55 21 290-4698 jonny@coppe.ufrj.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro UFRJ/COPPE/CISI PGP fingerprint: 29 C0 50 B9 B6 3E 58 F2 83 5F E3 26 BF 0F EA 67 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 05:07:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA10386 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 05:07:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from conductor.synapse.net (conductor.synapse.net [199.84.54.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA10381 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 05:07:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from evanc@synapse.net) Received: (qmail 10735 invoked from network); 1 Mar 1998 13:07:53 -0000 Received: from cpu1970.adsl.bellglobal.com (HELO cello) (206.47.37.201) by conductor.synapse.net with SMTP; 1 Mar 1998 13:07:53 -0000 Message-ID: <000d01bd4513$156a5ff0$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> From: "Evan Champion" To: "Joao Carlos Mendes Luis" Cc: , , Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 08:08:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >Delivery is local in all my installations. My concern is with reading. Maildirs are totally safe for reading or writing via NFS (or anything else) with or without locking, including environments with multiple servers doing deliveries. You would have to use a POP server that supports maildirs (included with qmail) or switch to a reader that supports them (ie: MUTT). Evan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 05:12:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA10738 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 05:12:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gaia.coppe.ufrj.br (cisigw.coppe.ufrj.br [146.164.5.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA10728 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 05:12:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonny@coppe.ufrj.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by gaia.coppe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA14426; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 10:11:55 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199803011311.KAA14426@gaia.coppe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server In-Reply-To: <000d01bd4513$156a5ff0$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> from Evan Champion at "Mar 1, 98 08:08:09 am" To: evanc@synapse.net (Evan Champion) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 10:11:54 -0300 (EST) Cc: jonny@coppe.ufrj.br, viren@rstcorp.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk #define quoting(Evan Champion) // >Delivery is local in all my installations. My concern is with reading. // // Maildirs are totally safe for reading or writing via NFS (or anything else) // with or without locking, including environments with multiple servers doing // deliveries. You would have to use a POP server that supports maildirs // (included with qmail) or switch to a reader that supports them (ie: MUTT). What exactly is "maildirs" ? Is it a form of dot locking ? Does procmail supports it ? I've recently changed my local mail deliverer to procmail. And do not feel tempted to change smtpd/sendmail/procmail for qmail in the near future. Mutt is in my test queue, though. Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br +55 21 290-4698 jonny@coppe.ufrj.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro UFRJ/COPPE/CISI PGP fingerprint: 29 C0 50 B9 B6 3E 58 F2 83 5F E3 26 BF 0F EA 67 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 05:18:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA11724 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 05:18:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from conductor.synapse.net (conductor.synapse.net [199.84.54.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA11714 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 05:18:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from evanc@synapse.net) Received: (qmail 11063 invoked from network); 1 Mar 1998 13:18:41 -0000 Received: from cpu1970.adsl.bellglobal.com (HELO cello) (206.47.37.201) by conductor.synapse.net with SMTP; 1 Mar 1998 13:18:41 -0000 Message-ID: <001d01bd4514$97b25070$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> From: "Evan Champion" To: "Joao Carlos Mendes Luis" Cc: , , Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 08:18:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >What exactly is "maildirs" ? Is it a form of dot locking ? Does >procmail supports it ? I've recently changed my local mail deliverer >to procmail. And do not feel tempted to change smtpd/sendmail/procmail >for qmail in the near future. A maildir is a mailbox structure that does not require _any_ locking (including dot locking). AFAIK, qmail is the only MTA that can write to a maildir. See for more info. Evan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 07:22:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA21400 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 07:22:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA21346 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 07:22:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dag-erli@ifi.uio.no) Received: from hrotti.ifi.uio.no (2602@hrotti.ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.15]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id QAA17513; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 16:22:16 +0100 (MET) Received: (from dag-erli@localhost) by hrotti.ifi.uio.no ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 16:22:15 +0100 (MET) To: Scot Elliott Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server References: Organization: Gutteklubben Terrasse / KRST / PUMS X-url: http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~dag-erli/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) Date: 01 Mar 1998 16:22:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: Scot Elliott's message of "Fri, 27 Feb 1998 07:49:50 +0000 (GMT)" Message-ID: Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Scot Elliott writes: > Hmm... well I've always avoided 3com cards in FreeBSD because of the > rather discouraging comments in LINT: > > # el: 3Com 3C501 (slow!) This card sucks *big* rocks through straws. The only way to make it go anywhere is gravity. The word around the campfire (and the impression one gets from their web site) is that 3Com won't even admit to its existence. IIRC from my Slackware days, the Linux docs say that you should never use this card even if you have no other option. > # ep: 3Com 3C509 (buggy) I have several of these (3c509 and 3c509B) and they work just fine. -- "I have a closed mind. It helps keeping the rain out." (Michael Press on a.s.r) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 07:28:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA22141 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 07:28:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA22134 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 07:28:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dag-erli@ifi.uio.no) Received: from hrotti.ifi.uio.no (2602@hrotti.ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.15]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id QAA17934; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 16:28:25 +0100 (MET) Received: (from dag-erli@localhost) by hrotti.ifi.uio.no ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 16:28:25 +0100 (MET) To: John Polstra Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A 'make world' suggestion... References: <008401bd42d5$d07a1190$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> <199802262135.NAA09350@austin.polstra.com> Organization: Gutteklubben Terrasse / KRST / PUMS X-url: http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~dag-erli/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) Date: 01 Mar 1998 16:28:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: John Polstra's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:35:01 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk John Polstra writes: > > That would not be good for the case where /usr/obj is the root of a mounted > > filesystem (ie: in my case, /usr/src and /usr/obj are NFS mounted). Perhaps > > rm -rf /usr/obj/* would be better. Either way, you're right; it's much > > faster to toast /usr/obj in advance. > There's an even faster way. Put /usr/obj alone in its own filesystem, > and replace the "rm -rf" with a umount - newfs - mount sequence. > Newfs is the fastest version of "rm -rf" in the world. With the added advantage that you can 'mount -o async /usr/obj', and cut your make world time by half. On a 166 MHz Classic Pentium with 128 MB 60 ns EDO RAM, /usr/src on its own 256 MB partition mounted noatime and /usr/obj on its own 256 MB partition mounted async (both on an 4.3 GB IDE Quantum Fireball-SE, unfortunately) and OFLAGS set to '-O -pipe', I make world (without -DNOCLEAN and without nuking /usr/obj) in two and a half hours. -- "I have a closed mind. It helps keeping the rain out." (Michael Press on a.s.r) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 11:54:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA23547 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 11:54:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gvr.gvr.org (root@gvr.gvr.org [194.151.74.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA23534 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 11:54:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from guido@gvr.org) Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.gvr.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) id UAA20365; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 20:54:07 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij Message-Id: <199803011954.UAA20365@gvr.gvr.org> Subject: Re: cvs update fails In-Reply-To: <26115.888522320@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Feb 26, 98 11:45:20 am" To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 20:54:07 +0100 (MET) Cc: owensc@enc.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Ummm... anyone ever seen this? > > Yes, once when my CVS repository was corrupted. Are you sure yours is > kosher? You might try removing src/contrib/cvs/src/rcs.c and > re-cvsuping it just to make sure. I have seen the same porblem here. What fixes it is rm -rf the pkg_install source dir and do a checkout again. Seems like a CS bug to me. -Guido To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 14:21:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA12800 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 14:21:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vanuata (vanuata.dcs.gla.ac.uk [130.209.240.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA12792 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 14:21:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from simonm@dcs.gla.ac.uk) Received: from solander.dcs.gla.ac.uk (actually host solander) by vanuata with SMTP (MMTA) with ESMTP; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 22:20:41 +0000 Received: (from simonm@localhost) by solander.dcs.gla.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA00266; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 22:20:39 GMT To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: still time for an NFS fix? From: Simon Marlow Date: 01 Mar 1998 22:20:39 +0000 Message-ID: Lines: 19 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Could someone bring in r1.46 of nfs_serv.c to STABLE please? It fixes the problems I've been having NFS serving to Dec OSF boxes, for which I submitted a PR (kern/4875). It's a fairly innocuous fix anyway. I'm still having trouble with NFS (especially the server side) communicating with other non-FreeBSD machines - the clients all tend to report "NFS server not responding still trying" followed by the OK message, every few operations. Occasionally the client hangs, and needs a reboot to get NFS up again. This happens with Solaris/Sparc, Solaris/x86 and Linux/x86 boxes. Cheers, Simon -- Simon Marlow simonm@dcs.gla.ac.uk University of Glasgow http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~simonm/ finger for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 15:30:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA23319 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 15:30:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA23296 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 15:30:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA28169; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 15:30:19 -0800 (PST) To: Simon Marlow cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: still time for an NFS fix? In-reply-to: Your message of "01 Mar 1998 22:20:39 GMT." Date: Sun, 01 Mar 1998 15:30:19 -0800 Message-ID: <28165.888795019@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Will do! > > Could someone bring in r1.46 of nfs_serv.c to STABLE please? It fixes > the problems I've been having NFS serving to Dec OSF boxes, for which > I submitted a PR (kern/4875). It's a fairly innocuous fix anyway. > > I'm still having trouble with NFS (especially the server side) > communicating with other non-FreeBSD machines - the clients all tend > to report "NFS server not responding still trying" followed by > the OK message, every few operations. Occasionally the client hangs, > and needs a reboot to get NFS up again. This happens with > Solaris/Sparc, Solaris/x86 and Linux/x86 boxes. > > Cheers, > Simon > > -- > Simon Marlow simonm@dcs.gla.ac.uk > University of Glasgow http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~simonm/ > finger for PGP public key > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 16:22:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA03176 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 16:22:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.goodnet.com (pop.goodnet.com [207.98.129.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA03159 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 16:22:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from slunk@goodnet.com) Received: from turdle (phx-ts14-18.goodnet.com [207.98.132.179]) by pop.goodnet.com (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id RAA19081 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 17:23:35 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <000b01bc269f$d6fcf990$0300000a@turdle> From: "Johnathan" To: Subject: unsubscribe slunk@goodnet.com Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 17:22:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01BC2665.297ECEE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BC2665.297ECEE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable unsubscribe slunk@goodnet.com ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BC2665.297ECEE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
unsubscribe slunk@goodnet.com
 
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BC2665.297ECEE0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 1 19:20:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA25083 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 19:20:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from emu.sourcee.com (emu.sourcee.com [199.201.159.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA24640 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 19:17:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nrice@emu.sourcee.com) Received: (from nrice@localhost) by emu.sourcee.com (8.8.8/8.8.3) id WAA01342; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 22:17:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19980301221726.09823@emu.sourcee.com> Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 22:17:26 -0500 From: Norman C Rice To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: bounce memory out of range detection code Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Will the -current code to detect and disable ``bounce memory out of range'' be merged into 2.2.6? -- Regards, Norman C. Rice, Jr. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 2 09:00:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA08878 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 09:00:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA08819 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 08:59:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dag-erli@ifi.uio.no) Received: from yggdrasil.ifi.uio.no (2602@yggdrasil.ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.182]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id RAA17497; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 17:59:17 +0100 (MET) Received: (from dag-erli@localhost) by yggdrasil.ifi.uio.no ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 17:59:16 +0100 (MET) To: "Evan Champion" Cc: "Joao Carlos Mendes Luis" , , Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server References: <001d01bd4514$97b25070$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> Organization: Gutteklubben Terrasse / KRST / PUMS X-url: http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~dag-erli/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) Date: 02 Mar 1998 17:59:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Evan Champion"'s message of "Sun, 1 Mar 1998 08:18:57 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 8 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk "Evan Champion" writes: > [something about maildirs] Going off-topic here, but could you please switch to a UA that sets references correctly? (i.e. *anything* but MS Outlook) -- "I have a closed mind. It helps keeping the rain out." (Michael Press on a.s.r) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 2 13:17:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA14350 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 13:17:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.pernet.net (mail.pernet.net [205.229.0.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA14304 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 13:16:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shiloh@pernet.net) Received: from shiloh.pernet.net (dialin0150.pernet.net [205.229.0.150]) by mail.pernet.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP id PAA05176 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:28:31 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <004101bd4620$a1bf2b80$9600e5cd@shiloh.pernet.net> From: "David Lisenby" To: Subject: Join mailing list Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:17:38 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003E_01BD45EE.56416060" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01BD45EE.56416060 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please add me to the freebsd-stable mailling list. Thanks David Lisenby shiloh@pernet.net ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01BD45EE.56416060 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Please add me to the freebsd-stable = mailling=20 list.
Thanks
David Lisenby
shiloh@pernet.net
------=_NextPart_000_003E_01BD45EE.56416060-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 2 13:53:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA23747 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 13:53:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from adsdevelop2.autodebit.com ([204.50.245.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA23704 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 13:52:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from davidg@autodebit.com) Received: by adsdevelop2.autodebit.com with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3) id ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 13:54:31 -0800 Message-ID: <71D507C37988D11182ED0000F80462AC69D4@adsdevelop2.autodebit.com> From: David Green-Seed To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: A new cd player program for FreeBSD Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 13:54:30 -0800 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I've just created a new cd player program for FreeBSD. You can find out more about it, as well as get binaries and source at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Haven/7797/ The page was put up today, so it's pretty bare bones. But it should be enough to get you started. I created the program because I couldn't find a cd player that I liked for FreeBSD. It has the cool look and feel of WMRack, with some small differences. Let me know what you think! Dave. davidg@autodebit.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 2 15:20:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA12737 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:20:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from conductor.synapse.net (conductor.synapse.net [199.84.54.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA12648 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 15:20:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from evanc@synapse.net) Received: (qmail 11524 invoked from network); 2 Mar 1998 23:20:34 -0000 Received: from cpu1970.adsl.bellglobal.com (HELO cello) (206.47.37.201) by conductor.synapse.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 1998 23:20:34 -0000 Message-ID: <016f01bd4631$d7e039a0$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> From: "Evan Champion" To: Subject: Bug in restore? Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 18:20:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk If I try to restore from a dump over NFS, restore generates a bus error. If I try to restore from the same dump locally (ie: telnet to the NFS server and do it), it works just fine. Can anyone else duplicate this? Evan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 2 16:25:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA27700 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 16:25:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pixel.planetx.com.au (root@pixel.planetx.com.au [203.16.241.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA27691 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 16:25:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@planetx.com.au) Received: from encoder (encoder.planetx.com.au [202.12.88.107]) by pixel.planetx.com.au (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA07667 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 11:31:04 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <004401bd463a$91f80540$6b580cca@encoder.planetx.com.au> From: "James Gardiner" To: Subject: New player. Bad compile. Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:23:18 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hello, I decided to implement the freebsd-stable on my system, mainly because I has some peoblems with hard drives and I wanted to update to the best version available. From reading all I can find, freebsd-stable is the best bet. (Ie current release plus fixes.) I was surprised when I had a compile error as follows this message. My current system is uname -a: FreeBSD pixel.planetx.com.au 2.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 16 22:24:56 EST 1998 james@pixel.planetx.com.au:/usr/src/sys/compile/PIXEL i386 -- And the compile error occures in libexec/ftpd Any help appriciated. James --- # make cc -O -DSETPROCTITLE -DSKEY -DLOGIN_CAP -DVIRTUAL_HOSTING -Wall -c ftpcmd.c y.tab.c: In function `yyparse': y.tab.c:1102: `buf' undeclared (first use this function) y.tab.c:1102: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once y.tab.c:1102: for each function it appears in.) y.tab.c:1103: `stbuf' undeclared (first use this function) y.tab.c:1117: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement y.tab.c:1070: label `yyabort' used but not defined y.tab.c:1016: label `yyoverflow' used but not defined y.tab.c:1120: warning: control reaches end of non-void function y.tab.c: At top level: y.tab.c:1121: parse error before `break' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:528: parse error before `0' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:528: conflicting types for `dologout' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/extern.h:41: previous declaration of `dologout' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:528: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:540: conflicting types for `restart_point' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:93: previous declaration of `restart_point' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:540: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:541: parse error before `if' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:551: redefinition of `restart_point' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:540: `restart_point' previously defined here /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:551: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:551: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:552: parse error before `350' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:553: conflicting types for `reply' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/extern.h:57: previous declaration of `reply' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:553: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:581: warning: initialization makes integer from p ointer without a cast /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:581: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:582: conflicting types for `p' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:581: previous declaration of `p' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:582: invalid initializer /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:582: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:582: conflicting types for `p' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:582: previous declaration of `p' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:582: invalid initializer /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:582: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:583: warning: initialization makes integer from p ointer without a cast /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:583: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: conflicting types for `a' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:583: previous declaration of `a' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: invalid initializer /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: conflicting types for `a' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: previous declaration of `a' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: invalid initializer /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: conflicting types for `a' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: previous declaration of `a' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: invalid initializer /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: conflicting types for `a' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: previous declaration of `a' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: invalid initializer /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:584: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:585: parse error before `}' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:607: conflicting declarations of `cmd_form' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:96: `cmd_form' previously declared here /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:607: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:608: parse error before `}' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:612: redefinition of `cmd_form' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:607: `cmd_form' previously defined here /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:612: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:612: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:613: parse error before `}' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:617: redefinition of `cmd_form' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:612: `cmd_form' previously defined here /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:617: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:618: parse error before `}' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:622: redefinition of `cmd_form' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:617: `cmd_form' previously defined here /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:622: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:622: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:623: parse error before `}' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:631: conflicting declarations of `cmd_bytesz' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:97: `cmd_bytesz' previously declared here /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:631: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:632: parse error before `}' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:636: redefinition of `cmd_bytesz' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:631: `cmd_bytesz' previously defined here /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:636: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:636: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:637: parse error before `}' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:642: redefinition of `cmd_bytesz' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:636: `cmd_bytesz' previously defined here /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:642: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:642: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:643: parse error before `}' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:689: parse error before `&' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:697: parse error before `&' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:697: conflicting types for `globfree' /usr/include/glob.h:87: previous declaration of `globfree' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:697: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:698: parse error before `[' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:698: conflicting types for `free' /usr/include/stdlib.h:94: previous declaration of `free' /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:698: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:717: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:717: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:718: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:719: warning: data definition has no type or stor age class /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:720: parse error before `while' y.tab.c:1352: initializer element is not constant y.tab.c:1352: warning: data definition has no type or storage class y.tab.c:1353: parse error before `-=' y.tab.c:1354: `yyn' undeclared here (not in a function) y.tab.c:1354: warning: data definition has no type or storage class y.tab.c:1355: parse error before `if' ftpcmd.c:18: warning: `yygrowstack' declared `static' but never defined /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:95: warning: `cmd_type' defined but not used /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:1186: warning: `help' defined but not used /usr/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpcmd.y:1251: warning: `sizecmd' defined but not used *** Error code 1 Stop. # To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 2 18:38:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA13591 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 18:38:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freebase.camb.opengroup.org (freebase.camb.opengroup.org [130.105.3.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA13547 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 18:38:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@loverso.southborough.ma.us) Received: from loverso.southborough.ma.us (simplon.osf.org [130.105.7.200]) by freebase.camb.opengroup.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA07044; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:37:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.southborough.ma.us (localhost.southborough.ma.us [127.0.0.1]) by loverso.southborough.ma.us (8.8.7/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA16463; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:37:37 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199803030237.VAA16463@loverso.southborough.ma.us> X-Authentication-Warning: loverso.southborough.ma.us: localhost.southborough.ma.us [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: David Green-Seed Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A new cd player program for FreeBSD In-reply-to: Message from David Green-Seed <71D507C37988D11182ED0000F80462AC69D4@adsdevelop2.autodebit.com> . X-Face: "UZ!}1W2N?eJdN(`1%|/OOPqJ).Idk?UyvWw'W-%`Gto8^IkEm>.g1O$[.;~}8E=Ire0|lO .o>:NlJS1@vO9bVmswRoq3j DdX9YGSeJ5a(mfX[1u>Z63G5_^+'8LVqjqvn X-Url: http://www.osf.org/~loverso/ Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 21:37:37 -0500 From: John Robert LoVerso Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Where as your program looks nice, why is there a proliferation of "Linux-only" or "FreeBSD-only" applications? Does "WMRack" contain code that makes it impossible for it to work on other operating systems? Does your cd play have the same nod towards FreeBSD? Have people forgotten about "porting" and "portable software"? John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 2 19:14:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA18646 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 19:14:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gaia.coppe.ufrj.br (cisigw.coppe.ufrj.br [146.164.5.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA18617 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 19:13:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonny@coppe.ufrj.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by gaia.coppe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA05132; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 00:09:57 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199803030309.AAA05132@gaia.coppe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: A new cd player program for FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199803030237.VAA16463@loverso.southborough.ma.us> from John Robert LoVerso at "Mar 2, 98 09:37:37 pm" To: john@loverso.southborough.ma.us (John Robert LoVerso) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 00:09:57 -0300 (EST) Cc: davidg@autodebit.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk #define quoting(John Robert LoVerso) // Where as your program looks nice, why is there a proliferation of // "Linux-only" or "FreeBSD-only" applications? Does "WMRack" contain // code that makes it impossible for it to work on other operating // systems? Does your cd play have the same nod towards FreeBSD? // Have people forgotten about "porting" and "portable software"? Taken from WMRack page: "Caution: Only tested under Linux! Send bug-reports including full description to Oliver Graf. Patchs for different systems are welcome." David, do you consider your program new from scratch or could it be a "port" ? Why not send the patchs to work with FreeBSD to the original WMRack author, and also making a port to the FreeBSD ports tree ? Please David, note that I'm not underconsidering your work, but you said it was based on WMRack, so why just copy instead of working together, specially when the author is willing to do that ? I agree with John about Linux-Only applications, but making them FreeBSD-only is not the solution. Let's make them Unix-wide. Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br +55 21 290-4698 jonny@coppe.ufrj.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro UFRJ/COPPE/CISI PGP fingerprint: 29 C0 50 B9 B6 3E 58 F2 83 5F E3 26 BF 0F EA 67 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 2 20:43:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA00575 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:43:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from casa.staub.net (casagate.staub.net [206.129.249.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA00437 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:42:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phils@casa.staub.net) Received: (from phils@localhost) by casa.staub.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) id UAA18084; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:41:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 20:41:23 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803030441.UAA18084@casa.staub.net> From: Phil Staub To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: AX25 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Have I just looked in all the wrong places, or is there no one doing any AX.25 work on FreeBSD? -- Phil Staub, KE7HC Senior Software Engineer phil@staub.net Audio Precision, Inc. or phils@audioprecision.com Beaverton, OR 97075, (800) 231-7350 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 2 21:41:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA08366 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:41:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hcs.harvard.edu (hcs.harvard.edu [140.247.73.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA08357 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:41:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kemiller@hcs.harvard.edu) Received: (from kemiller@localhost) by hcs.harvard.edu (8.8.5/8.8.3) id AAA07082; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 00:41:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19980303004144.55817@hcs.harvard.edu> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 00:41:44 -0500 From: Kenneth Miller To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: odd getcwd behavior Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk getcwd has started to misbehave since i installed -stable. the following illustrates: [whitestar /]% lld usr drwxr-xr-x 21 root wheel 512 Feb 9 16:47 usr/ [whitestar /]% cd usr [whitestar /usr]% sh $ pwd /usr $ exit [whitestar /usr]% lld local drwxr-xr-x 22 root wheel 512 Feb 26 18:54 local/ [whitestar /usr]% cd local [whitestar /usr/local]% sh sh: cannot determine working directory $ pwd pwd: getcwd() failed: Permission denied $ the initial shell is zsh, which works fine, as does bash. sh, csh, and tcsh all suffer. it only seems to affect the /usr/local partition, which is particularily odd. apologies if i've missed something obvious. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 00:23:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA26934 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 00:23:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tower.ti.com (tower.ti.com [192.94.94.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA26927 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 00:23:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kf7nn@ti.com) Received: from tilde.csc.ti.com ([157.170.1.149]) by tower.ti.com (8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA05944; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:23:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from spdc.ti.com (ox.spdc.ti.com [192.226.26.51]) by tilde.csc.ti.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA25690; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:22:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from epcot.spdc.ti.com (epcot [192.226.26.53]) by spdc.ti.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA21884; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:22:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from vagnernt (dhcp22-158.spdc.ti.com [192.226.22.158]) by epcot.spdc.ti.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id CAA17568; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:22:56 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <000d01bd467d$7e6e5c20$9e16e2c0@vagnernt.spdc.ti.com> From: "kf7nn" To: "Phil Staub" , Subject: Re: AX25 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:22:23 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I think it was put off for lack of demand. -----Original Message----- From: Phil Staub To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Monday, March 02, 1998 10:45 PM Subject: AX25 >Have I just looked in all the wrong places, or is there no one doing >any AX.25 work on FreeBSD? > >-- >Phil Staub, KE7HC Senior Software Engineer >phil@staub.net Audio Precision, Inc. >or phils@audioprecision.com Beaverton, OR 97075, (800) 231-7350 > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 02:18:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA15283 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:18:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from didda.toti.est.is (toti.est.is [194.144.208.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA15270 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:18:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from totii@est.is) Received: from est.is (totii@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by didda.toti.est.is (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA02592; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:17:12 GMT (envelope-from totii@est.is) Message-ID: <34FBD8A7.1B5C0896@est.is> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 10:17:11 +0000 From: Thordur Ivarsson Reply-To: thivars@est.is X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kf7nn CC: Phil Staub , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AX25 References: <000d01bd467d$7e6e5c20$9e16e2c0@vagnernt.spdc.ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk kf7nn wrote: > > I think it was put off for lack of demand. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Staub > To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Monday, March 02, 1998 10:45 PM > Subject: AX25 > > >Have I just looked in all the wrong places, or is there no one doing > >any AX.25 work on FreeBSD? > > > >-- > >Phil Staub, KE7HC Senior Software Engineer > >phil@staub.net Audio Precision, Inc. > >or phils@audioprecision.com Beaverton, OR 97075, (800) 231-7350 > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message We could maybe start someting? Þórður Ívarsson TF3PXT/5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 02:24:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA16314 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:24:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (mmdf@salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id CAA16305 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:24:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 3 Mar 98 10:24:44 +0000 (GMT) To: Evan Champion cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in restore? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Mar 1998 18:20:52 EST." <016f01bd4631$d7e039a0$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 10:24:43 +0000 From: David Malone Message-ID: <9803031024.aa10582@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > If I try to restore from a dump over NFS, restore generates a bus error. If > I try to restore from the same dump locally (ie: telnet to the NFS server > and do it), it works just fine. Can anyone else duplicate this? I submitted a bug report and a fix for this about a month agao. It hasn't been comitted yet I think. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 02:30:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA17698 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:30:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc8.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA17693 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:30:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tg@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.90.6]) by ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA01534; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 11:28:44 +0100 (CET) Received: (from tg@localhost) by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) id LAA16479; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 11:28:43 +0100 (CET) To: thivars@est.is Cc: kf7nn , Phil Staub , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AX25 References: <000d01bd467d$7e6e5c20$9e16e2c0@vagnernt.spdc.ti.com> <34FBD8A7.1B5C0896@est.is> From: Thomas Gellekum Date: 03 Mar 1998 11:28:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: Thordur Ivarsson's message of Tue, 03 Mar 1998 10:17:11 +0000 Message-ID: <87afb8nk4p.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.16 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Thordur Ivarsson writes: > > From: Phil Staub > > > > >Have I just looked in all the wrong places, or is there no one doing > > >any AX.25 work on FreeBSD? > > We could maybe start someting? You could start by checking out the stuff in ftp://ftp.ucsd.edu/hamradio/packet/tcpip/bsd/. I've never got around to do anything myself. tg, DH8EAW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 02:58:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA21653 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:58:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shidahara1.planet.kobe-u.ac.jp (root@shidahara1.planet.kobe-u.ac.jp [133.30.50.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA21648 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:58:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from takawata@shidahara1.planet.kobe-u.ac.jp) Received: from shidahara1.planet.kobe-u.ac.jp (takawata@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shidahara1.planet.kobe-u.ac.jp (8.8.8+2.7Wbeta7/3.4W4-MX) with ESMTP id TAA06404 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 19:52:41 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199803031052.TAA06404@shidahara1.planet.kobe-u.ac.jp> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AX25 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Mar 1998 20:41:23 PST" References: <199803030441.UAA18084@casa.staub.net> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 19:52:41 +0900 From: Takanori Watanabe Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk In message <199803030441.UAA18084@casa.staub.net>, Phil Staub $B$5$s$$$o$/(B: >Have I just looked in all the wrong places, or is there no one doing >any AX.25 work on FreeBSD? I don't know about ham radio,but I heard about ax25 driver written by Yutaka HISANAGA. Check http://www.jp.FreeBSD.ORG/~yuki/FreeBSD/readmail.cgi?source=fj.os.bsd.freebsd&docnum=8466 , and http://hisa.cc.yamaguchi-u.ac.jp/ax25/ Unfortunetly these documents are all written in Japanese. According to the documents,This implement uses patched tunnel device (/dev/tun*) and most process is done in userland. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 04:30:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA02101 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 04:30:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from conductor.synapse.net (conductor.synapse.net [199.84.54.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id EAA02094 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 04:30:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from evanc@synapse.net) Received: (qmail 27387 invoked from network); 3 Mar 1998 12:30:38 -0000 Received: from cpu1970.adsl.bellglobal.com (HELO cello) (206.47.37.201) by conductor.synapse.net with SMTP; 3 Mar 1998 12:30:38 -0000 Message-ID: <002d01bd46a0$35f96390$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> From: "Evan Champion" To: "David Malone" Cc: Subject: Re: Bug in restore? Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 07:30:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >I submitted a bug report and a fix for this about a month agao. >It hasn't been comitted yet I think. Could someone please commit this then? It's a real pain in the ass having to do restores on the NFS server. Evan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 06:14:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA13841 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 06:14:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from adsight.com (adsight.com [207.86.2.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA13833 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 06:14:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from webadmin@adsight.com) Received: from localhost (webadmin@localhost) by adsight.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA14527; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:15:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:15:01 -0500 (EST) From: Sam Magee To: Evan Champion cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in restore? In-Reply-To: <016f01bd4631$d7e039a0$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > If I try to restore from a dump over NFS, restore generates a bus error. If > I try to restore from the same dump locally (ie: telnet to the NFS server > and do it), it works just fine. Can anyone else duplicate this? > > Evan I had the same experience between a 2.2.6-STABLE machine and a 2.2.5-Release machine. I moved the tape drive to the NFS server and it worked. Sam To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 06:44:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA18853 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 06:44:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from casa.staub.net (casagate.staub.net [206.129.249.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA18774 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 06:43:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phils@casagate.staub.net) Received: from casa.staub.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by casa.staub.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA18859; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 06:40:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <34FC1649.41C67EA6@staub.net> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 06:40:09 -0800 From: Phil Staub X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gellekum CC: thivars@est.is, kf7nn , Phil Staub , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AX25 References: <000d01bd467d$7e6e5c20$9e16e2c0@vagnernt.spdc.ti.com> <34FBD8A7.1B5C0896@est.is> <87afb8nk4p.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Thomas Gellekum wrote: > > Thordur Ivarsson writes: > > > > From: Phil Staub > > > > > > >Have I just looked in all the wrong places, or is there no one doing > > > >any AX.25 work on FreeBSD? > > > > We could maybe start someting? > > You could start by checking out the stuff in > ftp://ftp.ucsd.edu/hamradio/packet/tcpip/bsd/. I've never got around > to do anything myself. > > tg, DH8EAW Looks like a place to start. Thanks for the pointer. Phil -- Phil Staub, KE7HC Senior Software Engineer phil@staub.net Audio Precision, Inc. or phils@audioprecision.com Beaverton, OR 97075, (800) 231-7350 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 07:16:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA24303 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 07:16:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA24289 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 07:16:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfieber@indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA29268; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:16:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:16:18 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: "Viren R. Shah" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, John Fieber wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Viren R. Shah wrote: > > > 1. Is 2.2.6 close enough that we should put off installing 2.2-STABLE > > for a few days? Or in other terms, are there enough stability > > improvements in 2.2.6 that we should definitely wait for it. > > > > 2. I've seen a few mentions of NFS problems on 2.2.5. Are there any > > big gotchas wrt using a 2.2.x box as an NFS server? > > Depends on your clients. For 2.2.5, I can confirm that Solaris > and Digital Unix clients do NOT work using nfs v3. Digital Unix > works fine if you specify v2 when mounting. For the record, the latest nfs fix applied to the RELENG_2_2 branch fixes the problems I was having with Digital Unix and v3 mounts seem to be working fine. Solaris is still a problem. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 07:29:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA26574 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 07:29:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc8.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA26563 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 07:29:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tg@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.90.6]) by ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA02110; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 16:29:13 +0100 (CET) Received: (from tg@localhost) by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) id QAA00730; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 16:29:12 +0100 (CET) To: Sergiy Zhuk Cc: Werner Griessl , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, "Viren R. Shah" , Yuri Gindin , John Fieber Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS client References: From: Thomas Gellekum Date: 03 Mar 1998 16:29:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: Sergiy Zhuk's message of Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:17:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <87hg5fx06w.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Lines: 33 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.16 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Sergiy Zhuk writes: > On 26 Feb 1998, Thomas Gellekum wrote: > > > > Are you sure, that the client is in the exports-file of the server ? > > > Werner > > > > tg:230) showmount -e bert > > Exports list on bert: > > /claudia ghpc6 > > > > ghpc6 is the FreeBSD client. > > check your name resolution and make sure your client is ghpc6 ;) > login to 'bert' and use 'who' or 'w' to lookup your client's host name... > > client works perfect (except for nfsv3.tcp) with solaris and netapp at > least. Ok, after learning more about Solaris than I ever cared, I stumbled over the following in the mountd(1M) man page on Solaris 2.5.1: NOTES Some routines that compare hostnames use case-sensitive string comparisons; some do not. If an incoming request fails, verify that the case of the hostname in the file to be parsed matches the case of the hostname called for, and attempt the request again. After adding ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (as it's returned from DNS) everything works fine. tg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 09:54:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19567 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:54:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from adsdevelop2.autodebit.com ([204.50.245.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA19504 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:54:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from davidg@autodebit.com) Received: by adsdevelop2.autodebit.com with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3) id ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:55:25 -0800 Message-ID: <71D507C37988D11182ED0000F80462AC69DF@adsdevelop2.autodebit.com> From: David Green-Seed To: "'John Robert LoVerso'" , David Green-Seed Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: A new cd player program for FreeBSD Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:55:22 -0800 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Of course, WMRack could be ported. I wasn't interested in porting WMRack. _________________________ David Green-Seed davidg@autodebit.com Automated Debit Systems > -----Original Message----- > From: John Robert LoVerso [SMTP:john@loverso.southborough.ma.us] > Sent: Monday, March 02, 1998 6:38 PM > To: David Green-Seed > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: A new cd player program for FreeBSD > > Where as your program looks nice, why is there a proliferation of > "Linux-only" or "FreeBSD-only" applications? Does "WMRack" contain > code that makes it impossible for it to work on other operating > systems? Does your cd play have the same nod towards FreeBSD? > Have people forgotten about "porting" and "portable software"? > > John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 09:57:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA20276 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:57:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from adsdevelop2.autodebit.com ([204.50.245.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA20261 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:57:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from davidg@autodebit.com) Received: by adsdevelop2.autodebit.com with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3) id ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:59:03 -0800 Message-ID: <71D507C37988D11182ED0000F80462AC69E0@adsdevelop2.autodebit.com> From: David Green-Seed To: "'Joao Carlos Mendes Luis'" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: A new cd player program for FreeBSD Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:59:01 -0800 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I realize that ports are important. I wasn't interested in doing a port - this was somewhat of an exercise for me (to learn XLib) My code is definitely not a port or a patch of WMRack. The idea for it was taken from WMRack, but I wrote the player from scratch in C++. You're right about FreeBSD only. I would welcome a port to Linux - just I don't have the facilities to do it. Dave. _________________________ David Green-Seed davidg@autodebit.com Automated Debit Systems > -----Original Message----- > From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis [SMTP:jonny@coppe.ufrj.br] > Sent: Monday, March 02, 1998 7:10 PM > To: john@loverso.southborough.ma.us > Cc: davidg@autodebit.com; freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: A new cd player program for FreeBSD > > #define quoting(John Robert LoVerso) > // Where as your program looks nice, why is there a proliferation of > // "Linux-only" or "FreeBSD-only" applications? Does "WMRack" contain > // code that makes it impossible for it to work on other operating > // systems? Does your cd play have the same nod towards FreeBSD? > // Have people forgotten about "porting" and "portable software"? > > Taken from WMRack page: > > "Caution: Only tested under Linux! Send bug-reports including full > description to Oliver Graf. Patchs for different systems are welcome." > > David, do you consider your program new from scratch or could it > be a "port" ? Why not send the patchs to work with FreeBSD to > the original WMRack author, and also making a port to the FreeBSD > ports tree ? > > Please David, note that I'm not underconsidering your work, but you > said it was based on WMRack, so why just copy instead of working > together, specially when the author is willing to do that ? > > I agree with John about Linux-Only applications, but making them > FreeBSD-only is not the solution. Let's make them Unix-wide. > > Jonny > > -- > Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br > +55 21 290-4698 jonny@coppe.ufrj.br > Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro UFRJ/COPPE/CISI > PGP fingerprint: 29 C0 50 B9 B6 3E 58 F2 83 5F E3 26 BF 0F EA 67 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 10:08:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA22145 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:08:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA21802 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:07:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA01811; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 13:06:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199803031806.NAA01811@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: Bug in restore? In-Reply-To: <002d01bd46a0$35f96390$c9252fce@cello.synapse.net> from Evan Champion at "Mar 3, 98 07:30:54 am" To: evanc@synapse.net (Evan Champion) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 13:06:58 -0500 (EST) Cc: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Evan Champion said: > >I submitted a bug report and a fix for this about a month agao. > >It hasn't been comitted yet I think. > > Could someone please commit this then? It's a real pain in the ass having > to do restores on the NFS server. > I have it in my queue. It will be there soon. (I grabbed the fix when it came across, and then only recently had time to test it.) I'll commit it tonight. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 10:17:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA24277 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:17:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bogoflux.losalamos.nm.us (bogoflux.losalamos.nm.us [198.59.115.212]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA24206 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:16:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from russo@bogoflux.losalamos.nm.us) Received: by bogoflux.losalamos.nm.us id AA27584 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG); Tue, 3 Mar 1998 18:16:51 GMT Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 18:16:51 GMT From: Thomas Russo Message-Id: <199803031816.AA27584@bogoflux.losalamos.nm.us> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AX25 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk From: Phil Staub > >Have I just looked in all the wrong places, or is there no one doing >any AX.25 work on FreeBSD? I haven't tried it, but there's an NOS called "TNOS" which claims to run under FreeBSD --- it fakes out ppp (not ijppp, but the kernel one) and does all the normal NOS stuff that you'd need. I grabbed a copy of it, but since I don't have a TNC yet I never bothered to try it out. It's available at ftp://ftp.lantz.com/tnos/current There's a web site: http://www.lantz.com/tnos/whatis.tnos.html HTH, T. -- Tom Russo RHFHGSA FCATB TMA4 ISObabe TBTW12 KC5ZYC http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ "Question Authority --- OR ELSE!" -- Rev. Ivan Stang, HOS #601 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 15:50:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA19761 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 15:50:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tyree.iii.co.uk (tyree.iii.co.uk [195.89.149.230]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA19744; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 15:50:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nik@iii.co.uk) From: nik@iii.co.uk Received: from carrig.strand.iii.co.uk (carrig.strand.iii.co.uk [192.168.7.25]) by tyree.iii.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA02091; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 22:56:42 GMT Received: (from nik@localhost) by carrig.strand.iii.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA12166; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 23:00:08 GMT Message-ID: <19980303230007.18515@iii.co.uk> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 23:00:07 +0000 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: 'make world': /bin/sh not found Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e Organization: interactive investor Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Folks, This is an odd one. I'm trying to update my 2.2.5-stable system to the latest -stable. My last successful 'make world' was on Jan 31 this year. I tried again about 2 weeks ago, and 'make buildworld' is now failing at ===> gnu/lib/libg++/doc rm -f g++FAQ.info* libg++.info* iostream.info* Errs errs mklog lgpl.texinfo /bin/sh: not found *** Error code 1 Stop. This error is 100% repeatable, and happens whether I'm running the make in a root shell (tcsh) in an Xterm, or from 'sh' after booting the machine single user. I'm sure it's not a problem with the build process per se, otherwise I've have seen other complaints. And I'm pretty certain it's not flaky hardware, since the 'buildworld' fails at exactly the same point each time (regardless of the shell or the machine's run state). I assume that I'm running out of allowed resources at some point? I've tried using 'unlimit' before doing the build, to no effect. I've also copied over the most recent login.conf (1.9.2.6) for this branch, again to no effect. On the off chance there was a corruption in /usr/src I blew it away and checked it out from the CVS repository again. No change. I also blew away /usr/obj. Again, no change. I'm missing something obvious, but I'm damned if I know what it is. Suggestions welcome. N -- Work: nik@iii.co.uk | FreeBSD + Perl + Apache Rest: nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk | Remind me again why we need Play: nik@freebsd.org | Microsoft? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 17:54:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA20002 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:54:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from whizzo.TransSys.COM (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA19869 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:53:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.TransSys.COM) Received: from whizzo.TransSys.COM (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.TransSys.COM (8.8.8/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA27608; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 20:52:24 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199803040152.UAA27608@whizzo.TransSys.COM> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Warner Losh cc: Dennis Tenn , Scot Elliott , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: Re: xntp messages in new build References: <199802202230.PAA18268@harmony.village.org> In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Feb 1998 15:30:30 MST." <199802202230.PAA18268@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 20:52:23 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > In message Dennis Tenn writes: > : | Feb 20 15:34:16 uranus xntpd[16462]: Previous time adjustment didn't > : | complete > : > : All it means AFAIK is it couldn't connect to the time server to update the > : clock. This happens on my system too and you shouldn't worry about it. > > No. That's not quite right. It means that the last adjustment (via > tickadj) didn't finish slowly skewing the clock before the next one > was requested. I've seen this mostly when there is a largish offset > at the start. You can ignore these messages if you have a couple, but > thery may indicate something wrong with your hardware (or that of the > time server) if you get lots of them. Under normal circumstances, you shouldn't see this out of a clock adjustment that NTP makes. If you are, there are two likely possibilities: - Some other process (like timed?) did a tickadj() system call, and when the xntpd daemon did it's adjustment, it's seeing the residual delta. - The value of "tick" in the kernel is inconsistant with what xntpd is prepared to deal with. Possibly the "tickadj" program can correct this. Generally, xntpd will perform a series of adjustments to gently slew the clock; it's won't crank in more clock slew per interval than it believe the kernel can actually adjust. louie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 3 21:38:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA27475 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 21:38:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from suroit.rocler.qc.ca (root@suroit.rocler.qc.ca [204.101.179.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA27470 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 21:38:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vince@rocler.qc.ca) Received: from rocler.qc.ca (p153.rocler.qc.ca [204.101.179.153]) by suroit.rocler.qc.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA08878 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 00:41:53 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199803031806.NAA01811@dyson.iquest.net> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 00:38:31 -0500 (EST) From: Vincey To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Lightpens Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi guys, anyone know a lightpen that could work with FreeBSD/XFree86... I'm fed up with my mouse :) DrVince ~~~~~~~ http://www.rocler.qc.ca/vince To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 01:07:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA28486 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 01:07:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from po.masaki.ne.jp (ppp116.kct.nsknet.or.jp [210.160.226.225]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA28481 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 01:07:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chaki@nsknet.or.jp) From: chaki@nsknet.or.jp Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by po.masaki.ne.jp (8.8.7/3.5Wpl7) with ESMTP id SAA23415 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 18:07:10 +0900 (JST) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93b22 on Emacs 19.28 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19980304180709G.chaki@nsknet.or.jp> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 18:07:09 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 980219 Lines: 1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk ubscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 01:50:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA03078 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 01:50:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA03072; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 01:50:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA25170; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 01:49:36 -0800 (PST) To: nik@iii.co.uk cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'make world': /bin/sh not found In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Mar 1998 23:00:07 GMT." <19980303230007.18515@iii.co.uk> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 01:49:36 -0800 Message-ID: <25166.889004976@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > This is an odd one. I'm trying to update my 2.2.5-stable system to the > latest -stable. My last successful 'make world' was on Jan 31 this > year. Just a suggestion: cp /usr/src/share/mk/* /usr/share/mk I suspect that your bsd.info.mk file may be spooged. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 02:40:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA09110 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 02:40:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alcatel.fr (gatekeeper.alcatel.fr [194.133.58.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA09092; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 02:40:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr) From: THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr Received: from alcatel.fr (gatekeeper-ssn.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.244]) by mailgate.alcatel.fr (Alcanet/SMTP) with ESMTP id LAA02145; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 11:44:24 +0100 Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id LAA18620; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 11:37:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA00876; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 11:40:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from eole.telspace.alcatel.fr by telss1 (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA08999; Wed, 4 Mar 98 11:31:11 +0100 Received: from localhost by eole.telspace.alcatel.fr with SMTP (1.40.112.12/16.2) id AA149857361; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 11:29:21 +0100 X-Openmail-Hops: 1 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 98 11:29:09 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: mgetty and iij-ppp Mime-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="Texte" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Texte" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi I'm trying to use mgetty (v1.0) to drive ppp (as explained in the handbook : I've recompiled mgetty with AutoPPP support). I'm using FreeBSD v2.2.5, installed from a CDROM. I've got a problem : the initial connection (from a W**-95 client) is done all right (I can ping an machine from the client through the Ethernet I/F of my FreeBSD machine), but ppp does not stop after the end of the connection. Thus, mgetty is never awakened, and I can't make another connection from the client to the FreeBSD server (because ppp does not know how to answer the modem call). Do I need to patch ppp, so that it "exit()s" when the ppp connection is over or is there a newer version of ppp ? (or am I missing some black magic in the configuration files ?) Thanks in advance TfH Work : thierry.herbelot@telspace.alcatel.fr Home : thierry.herbelot@wanadoo.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 05:44:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA05512 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 05:44:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ady.warpnet.ro (ady.warpnet.ro [193.230.201.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA05430; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 05:43:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Received: from localhost (ady@localhost) by ady.warpnet.ro (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA10812; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 15:41:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 15:41:36 +0200 (EET) From: Penisoara Adrian To: THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mgetty and iij-ppp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi, On Wed, 4 Mar 1998 THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr wrote: > I've got a problem : the initial connection (from a W**-95 client) is > done all right (I can ping an machine from the client through the > Ethernet I/F of my FreeBSD machine), but ppp does not stop after the > end of the connection. Thus, mgetty is never awakened, and I can't > make another connection from the client to the FreeBSD server (because > ppp does not know how to answer the modem call). Thats *exactly* the problem I had when I reinstalled a server with 2.2.5-RELEASE ! Background: I had one server with 3.0-971117-SNAP installed on it; mgetty + user PPP worked very well in this situation. Then I had to reinstall the server (partitions were corrupted due to malfunctioning memory that has been installed later). Since this was a (probably unstable) SNAP I decided I should go for 2.2.5-RELEASE. After I have reinstalled everything, compiled mgetty taking care to insert "CFLAGS=-DAUTO_PPP" in the Makefile (shouldn't the packager patches be modified to do that ?), configured and rebooted the user ppp comported weird: Placing a call & connecting as well communication was OK, but when the uses hang up the PPP daemon wouldn't exit. > > Do I need to patch ppp, so that it "exit()s" when the ppp connection > is over or is there a newer version of ppp ? (or am I missing some > black magic in the configuration files ?) I have tried to manually patch the src/usr.sbin/ppp/main.c file based on the CVS log, but nothing changed. Thing is that 3.0-971117-SNAP has *NO* problem like that. And further more, the version of ppp in the 2.2.5-RELEASE seems to be far too old, many commands that appeared in the 3.0-current branch I couldn't find in the 2.2.5 branch... > > Thanks in advance > > TfH > > Work : thierry.herbelot@telspace.alcatel.fr > Home : thierry.herbelot@wanadoo.fr Ady (@warpnet.ro) Warp Net Technologies To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 14:26:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA06862 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 14:26:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA06854 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 14:26:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (d60-090.leach.ucdavis.edu [169.237.60.90]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA03043 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 14:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) id WAA19146; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 22:26:02 GMT Message-ID: <19980304142601.12232@nuxi.com> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 14:26:01 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: is xntpd working in -STABLE? Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 X-Warning: Mutt Bites! X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE Organization: The NUXI *BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I've got no problems with xntpd on a 2.2.5-R box with -CURRENT kernel from last week. BUT, on my two machines I've done a `make world' on it doesn't. I can't get it to create a `/var/run/ntp.drift' file. I've taken the /etc/ntp.conf file from the 2.2.5-R box and put it on the other two. No help. Tried ``xntpd -d'' to get some debuging output. It just exits. No explaintion, no output to the screen at all. /var/log/messages says: Mar 4 14:24:50 kongur xntpd[2261]: xntpd version=3.4e (beta multicast); Sat Oct 4 12:04:05 GMT 1997 (1) Mar 4 14:24:50 kongur xntpd[2261]: tickadj = 5, tick = 10000, tvu_maxslew = 495 but xntpd wont deamonize. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 17:21:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA13156 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 17:21:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from onyx.atipa.com (user14198@ns.atipa.com [208.128.22.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA13096 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 17:21:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@atipa.com) Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 1018); 5 Mar 1998 01:24:40 -0000 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 18:24:39 -0700 (MST) From: Atipa X-Sender: freebsd@dot.ishiboo.com To: THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mgetty and iij-ppp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Upgrade to the newest ppp. 2.2.5 is broken. Kevin On Wed, 4 Mar 1998 THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to use mgetty (v1.0) to drive ppp (as explained in the > handbook : I've recompiled mgetty with AutoPPP support). I'm using > FreeBSD v2.2.5, installed from a CDROM. > > I've got a problem : the initial connection (from a W**-95 client) is > done all right (I can ping an machine from the client through the > Ethernet I/F of my FreeBSD machine), but ppp does not stop after the > end of the connection. Thus, mgetty is never awakened, and I can't > make another connection from the client to the FreeBSD server (because > ppp does not know how to answer the modem call). > > Do I need to patch ppp, so that it "exit()s" when the ppp connection > is over or is there a newer version of ppp ? (or am I missing some > black magic in the configuration files ?) > > Thanks in advance > > TfH > > Work : thierry.herbelot@telspace.alcatel.fr > Home : thierry.herbelot@wanadoo.fr > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 17:56:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA22451 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 17:56:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pixel.planetx.com.au (root@pixel.planetx.com.au [203.16.241.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA22390; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 17:55:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@planetx.com.au) Received: from encoder (encoder.planetx.com.au [202.12.88.107]) by pixel.planetx.com.au (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA07383; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 13:01:22 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <000501bd47d9$77dd9e90$6b580cca@encoder.planetx.com.au> From: "James Gardiner" To: "Atipa" , Cc: , , Subject: Re: mgetty and iij-ppp Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:53:17 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > >Upgrade to the newest ppp. 2.2.5 is broken. What about 2.2.stable? James > >Kevin > >On Wed, 4 Mar 1998 THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm trying to use mgetty (v1.0) to drive ppp (as explained in the >> handbook : I've recompiled mgetty with AutoPPP support). I'm using >> FreeBSD v2.2.5, installed from a CDROM. >> >> I've got a problem : the initial connection (from a W**-95 client) is >> done all right (I can ping an machine from the client through the >> Ethernet I/F of my FreeBSD machine), but ppp does not stop after the >> end of the connection. Thus, mgetty is never awakened, and I can't >> make another connection from the client to the FreeBSD server (because >> ppp does not know how to answer the modem call). >> >> Do I need to patch ppp, so that it "exit()s" when the ppp connection >> is over or is there a newer version of ppp ? (or am I missing some >> black magic in the configuration files ?) >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> TfH >> >> Work : thierry.herbelot@telspace.alcatel.fr >> Home : thierry.herbelot@wanadoo.fr >> >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message >> > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 21:24:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA03755 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 21:24:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03722 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 21:23:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA06064 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 21:22:48 -0800 (PST) To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 21:22:48 -0800 Message-ID: <6060.889075368@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk ... will be Monday, March 9th. That means all general merge work and general sysinstall hackery must be done by 1:00PM PST on that day so that we may enter the BETA test cycle and start regression testing. Daily snapshots of the BETA bits will be made available as usual in ftp://releng22.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD. The BETA period for 2.2.6 will end on the 24th of March at 1:00AM PST, e.g. just a little after the 23rd of March has ended. :) I will be tagging the tree in preparation for 2.2.6 release at that time. Actually meeting a planned-in-advance deadline would also be a new thing around here and I'm going to do my darndest to see that it happens for once. :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 22:21:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA12545 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 22:21:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt050ndd.san.rr.com (root@dt050ndd.san.rr.com [204.210.31.221]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA12539; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 22:21:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Received: from dal.net (dougdougdougdoug@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt050ndd.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA09542; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 22:21:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Message-ID: <34FE4470.631FBD04@dal.net> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 22:21:36 -0800 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE-0303 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" CC: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA References: <6060.889075368@time.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > ... will be Monday, March 9th. So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 22:40:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA15047 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 22:40:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.196.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA15041 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 22:40:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp) Received: by outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp id AA24118; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:39:48 +0900 Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.7.6+2.6Wbeta7/3.4W/zodiac-May96) with ESMTP id PAA28902; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:47:52 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199803050647.PAA28902@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: Studded Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Mar 1998 22:21:36 PST." <34FE4470.631FBD04@dal.net> References: <6060.889075368@time.cdrom.com> <34FE4470.631FBD04@dal.net> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 15:47:52 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >> ... will be Monday, March 9th. > > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to >the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or >perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 23:21:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA20328 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:21:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt050ndd.san.rr.com (root@dt050ndd.san.rr.com [204.210.31.221]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA20318 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:21:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Received: from dal.net (dougdougdougdoug@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt050ndd.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA09814; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:20:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Message-ID: <34FE524F.218240D@dal.net> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:20:47 -0800 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE-0303 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kazutaka YOKOTA CC: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA References: <6060.889075368@time.cdrom.com> <34FE4470.631FBD04@dal.net> <199803050647.PAA28902@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: > > >> ... will be Monday, March 9th. > > > > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to > >the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or > >perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) > > I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts before you state your opinions. Check out http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 23:38:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA23777 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:38:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from N3.SP.CS.CMU.EDU (N3.SP.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.222.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA23741 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:38:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from prashant+@cs.cmu.edu) Received: from DUTT.NECTAR.CS.CMU.EDU by N3.SP.CS.CMU.EDU id aa01275; 5 Mar 98 2:38:22 EST Message-ID: <34FE565B.D889970B@cs.cmu.edu> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 02:38:03 -0500 From: "Prashant R. Chandra" Organization: Carnegie Mellon University X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.30 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: problems with de driver for quad card Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi! All, Please forgive me if this question has been asked before on the mailing list. I want to report a problem we are facing with the driver for the Zynx ZX346 Quad PCI ethernet card. When two of these cards are connected back-to-back (in two Pentium II PCs) the configuration seems to go haywire. The cards come up complaining that autosense failed and if I use ifconfig to set the media type to 100baseTX on both ends, I get connectivity but I have problem with bidirectional traffic. Ping seems to work fine, but doing a TCP bandwidth test using ttcp fails because packets are being dropped on the point-to-point link between the two cards. (Fails means the TCP bandwidth is only about 0.8 Mbps or so). Another problem is that I cannot get the link to operate at 10 Mbps. If I set the media to 10baseT/UTP, the interface reports that it has 'no carrier'. I have repeated the exact same tests with Windows NT 4.0 and everything seems to be fine (TCP bandwidth of 93 Mbps). Everything is also fine when one end of the link is a Dec Alpha workstation with a 100 Mbps ethernet interface (not the same quad board). The problem only happens when two quad cards are connected back to back in FreeBSD PCs. The problem seems to be due to misconfiguration of full-duplex/half-duplex operation. The list of supported media types for the de driver does not include 100baseTX and 10baseT/UTP . What is the reason? (the hardware supports full-duplex operation) The version of FreeBSD we are using is FreeBSD 2.2.5. We also see this problem with NetBSD 1.3. It is not suprising since the driver is the same. I had posted this message on the NetBSD mailing list a month ago and got no reply. Hopefully I will have better luck this time :-). If anyone out there has tried the quad cards in a back-to-configuration (using a null-cable) and has encountered similar problems please let me know. Any suggestions on how to tackle this will be greatly appreciated. Please reply directly to prashant@cs.cmu.edu. Thank you. -prashant PS: The exact ifconfig command we use to bring up the interfaces as 100Mbps is: ifconfig de0 192.200.51.1 255.255.255.0 192.200.51.255 media 100baseTX up -- ____________________________________________________ R. Prashant Chandra e-mail: prashant@cs.cmu.edu Web: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~prashant Phone: 412-268-2580 (Office) 412-268-7560 (Lab) 412-681-3829 (Home) ____________________________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 23:41:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA25162 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:41:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA25144; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:41:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA06788; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:40:54 -0800 (PST) To: Studded cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Mar 1998 22:21:36 PST." <34FE4470.631FBD04@dal.net> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:40:54 -0800 Message-ID: <6785.889083654@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to > the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or > perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) I don't know the answer to this yet. We'll have to see. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 4 23:50:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA26736 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:50:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA26711 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:50:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA06844; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:48:58 -0800 (PST) To: Studded cc: Kazutaka YOKOTA , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:20:47 PST." <34FE524F.218240D@dal.net> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:48:58 -0800 Message-ID: <6840.889084138@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. > > Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things > you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts > before you state your opinions. Check out > http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. I agree, uninformed guessing can be a bad thing. What guess lies behind your claim that XFree86 3.3.2 will be based on X11R6.4? Just because it's available internally to consortium members is by no means a declaration that the XFree86 project intends to track it in their upcoming point release of 3.3.2 and, in fact, I'd say that it'd be a very bad guess indeed to assume such a thing. :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 00:14:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA00518 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 00:14:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail-gw2.pacbell.net (mail-gw2.pacbell.net [206.13.28.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA00512; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 00:13:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oski@pacbell.net) Received: from pacbell.net (ppp-207-215-85-170.scrm01.pacbell.net [207.215.85.170]) by mail-gw2.pacbell.net (8.8.8/8.7.1+antispam) with ESMTP id AAA00853; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 00:13:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <34FE5DE1.B0FE54DE@pacbell.net> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:10:09 -0800 From: Michael Oski X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" CC: Studded , Kazutaka YOKOTA , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA References: <6840.889084138@time.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. > > > > Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things > > you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts > > before you state your opinions. Check out > > http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. > > I agree, uninformed guessing can be a bad thing. What guess lies > behind your claim that XFree86 3.3.2 will be based on X11R6.4? Just > because it's available internally to consortium members is by no means > a declaration that the XFree86 project intends to track it in their > upcoming point release of 3.3.2 and, in fact, I'd say that it'd be a > very bad guess indeed to assume such a thing. :-) > > Jordan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message Ah, the joy of rash assumptions.... FYI - XFree86 v3.3.2 is still based on X11R6.3, you can verify by checking the release notes included in the .tgz's. Also, www.XFree86.org claims they have no scheduled release date for version 4.0. Now here's my assumption: this is most likely the first based on X11R6.4 ;-) Michael! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 00:22:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA01506 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 00:22:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.196.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA01486 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 00:22:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp) Received: by outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp id AA24364; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:12:38 +0900 Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.7.6+2.6Wbeta7/3.4W/zodiac-May96) with ESMTP id RAA04215; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:20:33 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199803050820.RAA04215@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: Studded Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:20:47 PST." <34FE524F.218240D@dal.net> References: <6060.889075368@time.cdrom.com> <34FE4470.631FBD04@dal.net> <199803050647.PAA28902@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> <34FE524F.218240D@dal.net> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 17:20:31 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >> > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to ~~~~~~~ >> >the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or >> >perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) >> >> I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. > > Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things >you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts >before you state your opinions. Check out >http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. Nothing personal, but aren't you rather confusing the Open Group and the XFree86 Project Inc? XFree86 is primarily developed and distributed by the XFree86 Project Inc. The code is, of course, derived from that of the Open Group. But, it does not necessarily mean that the latest release from the XFree86 always matches the latest release of X11. In fact http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/r6.4doc/relnotes/relnotes.htm mentions XFree86 3.3.1 which was released in Aug. 97 and is based on X11R6.3pl2. You had better check out the XFree86 web site: http://www.xfree86.org/ rather than the Open Group's, for the latest information and status of XFree86. Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 01:30:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA11201 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 01:30:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA11191 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 01:30:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) Received: from salomon.mchp.siemens.de (salomon.siemens.de [139.23.33.13]) by david.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA21509 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:30:25 +0100 (MET) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer david.siemens.de) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (daemon@curry.mchp.siemens.de [146.180.31.23]) by salomon.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA21757 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:30:26 +0100 (CET) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA14826 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:30:26 +0100 (CET) From: Andre Albsmeier Message-Id: <199803050930.KAA10912@intern> Subject: Re: problems with de driver for quad card In-Reply-To: <34FE565B.D889970B@cs.cmu.edu> from "Prashant R. Chandra" at "Mar 5, 98 02:38:03 am" To: prashant+@cs.cmu.edu (Prashant R. Chandra) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:30:21 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Hi! All, > Please forgive me if this question has been asked before on the > mailing > list. I want to report a problem we are facing with the driver for the > Zynx ZX346 Quad PCI ethernet card. When two of these cards are > connected > back-to-back (in two Pentium II PCs) the configuration seems to go > haywire. > The cards come up complaining that autosense failed and if I use > ifconfig > to set the media type to 100baseTX on both ends, I get connectivity but > I have problem with bidirectional traffic. Ping seems to work fine, but > doing a TCP bandwidth test using ttcp fails because packets are being > dropped on the point-to-point link between the two cards. (Fails means > the TCP bandwidth is only about 0.8 Mbps or so). Another problem is > that > I cannot get the link to operate at 10 Mbps. If I set the media to > 10baseT/UTP, > the interface reports that it has 'no carrier'. The de driver is broken regarding the media selection. (PR 4841). I had some email exchange with Matt Thomas concerning this but haven't heard from him for approx. 2 month. I gave it up now and will keep on using the old version 1.54.2.6 which works for my SMC 8434BT. -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 01:54:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA14627 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 01:54:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt050ndd.san.rr.com (root@dt050ndd.san.rr.com [204.210.31.221]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA14620 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 01:54:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@san.rr.com) Received: from san.rr.com (dougdougdougdoug@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt050ndd.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA10547; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 00:57:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@san.rr.com) Message-ID: <34FE6915.C13E13CD@san.rr.com> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:57:57 -0800 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE-0303 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kazutaka YOKOTA CC: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA References: <6060.889075368@time.cdrom.com> <34FE4470.631FBD04@dal.net> <199803050647.PAA28902@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> <34FE524F.218240D@dal.net> <199803050820.RAA04215@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: > > >> > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to > ~~~~~~~ Please don't assume I don't know what I mean. I asked the question I wanted to ask. What I should have made more clear is that the open group's ftp site was the one I was referring to. > Nothing personal, but aren't you rather confusing the Open Group and > the XFree86 Project Inc? Nope, sorry I wasn't more clear. > XFree86 is primarily developed and distributed by the XFree86 Project > Inc. The code is, of course, derived from that of the Open Group. > But, it does not necessarily mean that the latest release from the > XFree86 always matches the latest release of X11. > You had better check out the XFree86 web site: > http://www.xfree86.org/ > rather than the Open Group's, for the latest information and status > of XFree86. I did, and there was no mention of anything beyond 3.3.1. Anyway, I've spent all day arguing with a pita solaris machine, and I am too tired to really give a rip. My apologies for any offense. Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 02:02:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA15960 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 02:02:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tyree.iii.co.uk (tyree.iii.co.uk [195.89.149.230]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA15907; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 02:02:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nik@iii.co.uk) From: nik@iii.co.uk Received: from carrig.strand.iii.co.uk (carrig.strand.iii.co.uk [192.168.7.25]) by tyree.iii.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA07685; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:56:36 GMT Received: (from nik@localhost) by carrig.strand.iii.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA14342; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:01:45 GMT Message-ID: <19980305100144.45075@iii.co.uk> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:01:44 +0000 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'make world': /bin/sh not found References: <19980303230007.18515@iii.co.uk> <25166.889004976@time.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e In-Reply-To: <25166.889004976@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 01:49:36AM -0800 Organization: interactive investor Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 01:49:36AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > This is an odd one. I'm trying to update my 2.2.5-stable system to the > > latest -stable. My last successful 'make world' was on Jan 31 this > > year. > > Just a suggestion: cp /usr/src/share/mk/* /usr/share/mk > I suspect that your bsd.info.mk file may be spooged. No joy. Something I neglected to mention was that I can go into the appropriate directory and run the 'make clean' by hand it works with no problems. It looks as though I'm hitting some sort of resource limit, but I can't find where. Very odd. N -- Work: nik@iii.co.uk | FreeBSD + Perl + Apache Rest: nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk | Remind me again why we need Play: nik@freebsd.org | Microsoft? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 04:11:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA03284 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 04:11:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (macon2.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.13.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA03276 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 04:10:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: from modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (modas.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.3]) by macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.8.4/8.8.3/AIX-4.1/WSI-1.0) with SMTP id NAA04594 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 13:10:35 +0100 Received: by modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA16220; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 13:10:31 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Compile failure on gctags Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.1.1.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Date: 05 Mar 1998 13:10:31 +0100 Message-Id: Lines: 19 X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.32/XEmacs 20.5(beta29) - "Loashan" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id EAA03279 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk In yesterday's STABLE (fetched from ftp.de.freebsd.org), the build fails like this: /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c: In function `c_entries': /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: `rflag' undeclared (first use this function) /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: for each function it appears in.) I think that one occurrence of rtag needs to be protected by an #ifdef GTAGS -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 05:34:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA12280 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:34:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (rwwa.com [198.115.177.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA12270 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:34:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from witr@spooky.rwwa.com) Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (localhost.rwwa.com [127.0.0.1]) by spooky.rwwa.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA11684 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 08:35:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from witr@spooky.rwwa.com) Message-Id: <199803051335.IAA11684@spooky.rwwa.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Request for next release Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 08:35:50 -0500 From: Robert Withrow Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the CD's are used for? I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. But when the 2.2.5 release came out I did't have a clue about what to do with my 4 CD riches... ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA, witr@rwwa.COM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 05:36:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA12757 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:36:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA12731 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:36:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA10227; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:36:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:36:03 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons To: "Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Compile failure on gctags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk What, without even my mangling hands stirring things up? I'll take a look momentarily. -Chris On 5 Mar 1998, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote: > > In yesterday's STABLE (fetched from ftp.de.freebsd.org), the build > fails like this: > > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c: In function `c_entries': > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: `rflag' undeclared (first use this function) > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: for each function it appears in.) > > I think that one occurrence of rtag needs to be protected by an > > #ifdef GTAGS > > -- > Cheers =8-} Mike > Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 05:46:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA14809 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:46:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA14803 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:46:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id FAA10549; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:45:53 -0800 (PST) To: Robert Withrow cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for next release In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Mar 1998 08:35:50 EST." <199803051335.IAA11684@spooky.rwwa.com> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 05:45:53 -0800 Message-ID: <10545.889105553@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > CD's are used for? Yes, that's already planned along with updated installation instructions. The next booklet will be a total rewrite, essentially. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 06:21:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA18912 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 06:21:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA18905 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 06:21:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA10677; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 06:20:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 06:20:54 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons To: "Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Compile failure on gctags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Michael, I didn't see it at first, but now I do: global is contribified in -stable, so there shouldn't be ANY program source files under src/usr.bin/global. I just built it here without any problem. The question is, what's up with your sources? I'm not sure how you are updating your sources, but you should use CVSup. See the FreeBSD Handbook at http://www.freebsd.org for instructions on how to do that. If you are ftp'ing the CVS repository, that is a sure way to run amok - retrieve that with CVSup as well. If you are updating your tree with CVS, you must say 'cvs update -Pd -rRELENG_2_2' in /usr/src. Regards, -Chris On 5 Mar 1998, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote: > > In yesterday's STABLE (fetched from ftp.de.freebsd.org), the build > fails like this: > > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c: In function `c_entries': > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: `rflag' undeclared (first use this function) > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: for each function it appears in.) > > I think that one occurrence of rtag needs to be protected by an > > #ifdef GTAGS > > -- > Cheers =8-} Mike > Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 06:22:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA19100 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 06:22:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.nitek.ru (ns.nitek.ru [194.247.139.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA19077 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 06:22:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor@nitek.ru) Received: from igor.nitek.ru (localhost.nitek.ru [127.0.0.1]) by ns.nitek.ru (8.8.4/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA28001 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:21:14 +0300 (MSK) Message-Id: <199803051421.RAA28001@ns.nitek.ru> From: "Igor Sysoev" To: Subject: Re: Request for next release Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:20:26 +0300 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > > CD's are used for? > > Yes, that's already planned along with updated installation > instructions. The next booklet will be a total rewrite, essentially. What' s about FAQ and Handbook ? Will be they included in HTML format ? with best regards, Igor Sysoev To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 08:03:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA00532 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 08:03:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (macon2.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.13.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA00523 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 08:03:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: from modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (modas.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.3]) by macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.8.4/8.8.3/AIX-4.1/WSI-1.0) with SMTP id RAA13718 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:03:01 +0100 Received: by modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA20716; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:03:01 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Compile failure on gctags References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.1.1.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Date: 05 Mar 1998 17:03:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: Chris Timmons's message of "Thu, 5 Mar 1998 06:20:54 -0800 (PST)" Message-Id: Lines: 35 X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.32/XEmacs 20.5(beta29) - "Loashan" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id IAA00528 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Timmons writes: Chris> Michael, Chris> I didn't see it at first, but now I do: global is contribified Chris> in -stable, I'm new to -STABLE, so I don't know what that means or how to fix it. Chris> so there shouldn't be ANY program source files under Chris> src/usr.bin/global. Can I just rm -rf that directory? Chris> I just built it here without any problem. The question is, what's up with Chris> your sources? Nothing. I pulled src.tar off /ftp.de.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-stable as per the Handbook instructions. Anything wrong with that? Chris> I'm not sure how you are updating your sources, but you should Chris> use CVSup. I can't because there's a networking bug in FreeBSD 2.2.5 that makes network writes fail (duly reported). That's actually the *reason* I want to compile stable at all---I have a faint hope it's fixed there. Catch-22 dadadadadaaaaaaaaaaaa -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 08:47:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA05440 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 08:47:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA05424 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 08:47:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA20438; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 16:46:41 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id RAA02191; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:46:39 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19980305174638.12848@follo.net> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:46:38 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: Igor Sysoev , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for next release References: <199803051421.RAA28001@ns.nitek.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199803051421.RAA28001@ns.nitek.ru>; from Igor Sysoev on Thu, Mar 05, 1998 at 05:20:26PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, Mar 05, 1998 at 05:20:26PM +0300, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > > > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > > > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > > > CD's are used for? > > > > Yes, that's already planned along with updated installation > > instructions. The next booklet will be a total rewrite, essentially. > > What' s about FAQ and Handbook ? Will be they included in HTML format ? I'm fairly certain the FAQ and handbook are automatically built for the distribution now. There was a flurry of commits (by Jordan) some time back to make this possible. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 09:21:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA12627 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:21:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA12611 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:21:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA11241; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:19:33 -0800 (PST) To: "Igor Sysoev" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for next release In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Mar 1998 17:20:26 +0300." <199803051421.RAA28001@ns.nitek.ru> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 09:19:33 -0800 Message-ID: <11237.889118373@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > What' s about FAQ and Handbook ? Will be they included in HTML format ? Yes, that's been fixed for awhile (see one of the SNAPs). Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 09:34:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA14951 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:34:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gershwin.tera.com (gershwin.tera.com [207.224.230.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA14936 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:34:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tera.tera.com) Received: from athena.tera.com (athena.tera.com [207.224.230.127]) by gershwin.tera.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA02354; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:32:15 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Kline Received: (from kline@localhost) by athena.tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA01863; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:32:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803051732.JAA01863@athena.tera.com> Subject: Re: Request for next release In-Reply-To: <199803051335.IAA11684@spooky.rwwa.com> from Robert Withrow at "Mar 5, 98 08:35:50 am" To: witr@rwwa.com (Robert Withrow) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:32:11 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL23 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk According to Robert Withrow: > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > CD's are used for? > > I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the > good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding > (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. But when the > 2.2.5 release came out I did't have a clue about what to do with > my 4 CD riches... > > ;-) > I'll second this. I installed 2.1.5 to my new 6x86 box no problem. Except for X. With my new 2.2.5 (very stable) after perhaps 6 hours and as many retries, zip. X fails. I can't find the VGA-16 driver. The release fails to boot in any fashion, although this may be a BIOS config problem. Debian was almost pushbutton on my 0th and 2nd SCSI; so X does work with my Matrox vcard. This is my 3rd CD set. Should be the simplest, but isn't. If there are any FBSD gurus in the Seattle area willing to help out, I'll buy ya a beer. In fact an entire case! gary kline kline@tera.com kline@thought.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 10:02:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA19010 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:02:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from uranus.planet-three.com (homer.duff-beer.com [194.207.51.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA18994 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:02:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scot@poptart.org) Received: from localhost (scot@localhost) by uranus.planet-three.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA08056; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:01:24 GMT Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:01:24 +0000 (GMT) From: Scot Elliott To: Robert Withrow cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for next release In-Reply-To: <199803051335.IAA11684@spooky.rwwa.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Robert Withrow wrote: > I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the > good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding > (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. But when the > 2.2.5 release came out I did't have a clue about what to do with > my 4 CD riches... > True - the descriptions on the last CD sets weren't entirely accurate ;-) I only just discovered the 'missing' packages on the fourth CD. Is there really not enough room on any of the CDs for the whole packages collection? And what colour is the cutesy little daemon fellow going to be this time? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scot Elliott (scot@poptart.org) | Work: +44 (0)1344 899401 PGP fingerprint: FCAE9ED3A234FEB59F8C7F9DDD112D | Home: +44 (0)181 8961019 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public key available by finger at: finger scot@poptart.org or at: http://www.poptart.org/pgpkey.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 10:46:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA26581 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:46:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ziplink.net (relay-0.ziplink.net [206.15.168.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA26501 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:45:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lrios@ziplink.net) Received: from zip1.ziplink.net (zip1.ziplink.net [206.15.168.18]) by ziplink.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA21380 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 13:45:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 13:48:25 -0500 (EST) From: lrios To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RAID Controllers Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand of controllers will it support?? If any would be appreciated.. ______ __ /___ / / / __ / /(@)__ / (@)__ / /__ lrios@ziplink.net / // / _ \/ / / _ \/ '_/ / //_/ .__/_/_/_//_/_/\_\ NASA TEAM / /__/_/___________________ `He who dies with the most toys win!` /___________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 11:04:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA00242 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:04:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA00168 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:04:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from benedict@echonyc.com) Received: from localhost (benedict@localhost) by echonyc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA11840 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:04:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:04:00 -0500 (EST) From: Snob Art Genre To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: -stable suitable for small-enterprise NFS server? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I can't imagine that this would be the case . . . but are there any NFS issues I should know about before building a ~12-user -stable NFS box? Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 11:30:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA03789 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:30:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nak.myhouse.com (nak.myhouse.com [209.70.45.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA03783 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:30:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zoonie@myhouse.com) Received: from localhost (zoonie@localhost) by nak.myhouse.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA12471 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:29:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from zoonie@myhouse.com) X-Authentication-Warning: nak.myhouse.com: zoonie owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:29:55 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie Reply-To: zoonie To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: problem compiling stable yesterday..... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk i have been having some trouble compiling 2.2.5-stable on this machine for the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make buildworld" was run. so, instead of trying to figure out exactly what the problem was i just deleted everything in /usr/src and used cvsup to put it all back. then i did a "make world" and everything was going along just fine so i went to bed. this morning i checked and i saw that the machine rebooted itself. the machine is running stable from around jan.29th and it has always compiled stable without any problems and i have never had any problems with it. does anybody have any ideas or do i need to RTFM? thanks....... > t found at 0x360 > pid 20789 (make), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0xefc004b8 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xf017484b > stack pointer = 0x10:0xefbfff14 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xefbfff24 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 14017 (as) > interrupt mask = net tty bio > panic: page fault > > syncing disks... 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 giving up > Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort > Rebooting... > Copyright (c) 1992-1998 FreeBSD Inc. > Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE #0: Sat Jan 31 08:44:48 EST 1998 > root@zero.myhouse.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/ZERO > CPU: i486DX (486-class CPU) > real memory = 33554432 (32768K bytes) > avail memory = 30826496 (30104K bytes) > Probing for devices on the ISA bus: > sc0 at 0x60-0x6f irq 1 on motherboard > sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> > sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on isa > sio0: type 16450 > sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa > sio1: type 16450 > lpt0 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > lp0: TCP/IP capable interface > fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa > fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in > wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa > wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): > wd0: 2014MB (4124736 sectors), 4092 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S > 1 3C5x9 board(s) on ISA found at 0x300 > ep0 at 0x300-0x30f irq 10 on isa > ep0: aui/utp[*UTP*] address 00:a0:24:04:17:c9 > npx0 flags 0x1 on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 11:33:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA04722 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:33:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA04682 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:33:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0yAgOW-000525-00; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:33:28 -0800 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:33:27 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: zoonie cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make Your hardware is bad. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 11:33:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA04772 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:33:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA04693 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:33:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0yAg1c-0002so-00; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:09:48 -0800 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:09:47 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: lrios cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RAID Controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, lrios wrote: > Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand > of controllers will it support?? > If any would be appreciated.. - Any kind of SCSI-SCSI RAID box - DPT (you need to install driver yourself from ftp.simon-shapiro.org) Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 11:37:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA06415 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:37:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nak.myhouse.com (nak.myhouse.com [209.70.45.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA06340 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:37:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zoonie@myhouse.com) Received: from localhost (zoonie@localhost) by nak.myhouse.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA12508; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:37:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from zoonie@myhouse.com) X-Authentication-Warning: nak.myhouse.com: zoonie owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:37:01 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie To: Tom cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk ok, i'll look into that. i was wondering about that as i composed the message.....thanks.... BTW, somebody had mentioned a signal 11 FAQ a couple of months ago on this list and i looked around but didn't find it. does anybody know where it is located? On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > > > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make > > Your hardware is bad. > > Tom > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 12:16:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA13239 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 12:16:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [206.156.231.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA13234 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 12:16:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paul@elvis.mu.org) Received: (from paul@localhost) by elvis.mu.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA25271; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:16:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from paul) Message-ID: <19980305141634.06112@mu.org> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:16:34 -0600 From: Paul Saab To: zoonie Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i In-Reply-To: ; from zoonie on Thu, Mar 05, 1998 at 02:37:01PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ71.html#71 Paul zoonie (zoonie@myhouse.com) wrote: > ok, i'll look into that. i was wondering about that as i composed the > message.....thanks.... > > BTW, somebody had mentioned a signal 11 FAQ a couple of months ago on this > list and i looked around but didn't find it. does anybody know where it > is located? > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > > > > > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make > > > > Your hardware is bad. > > > > Tom > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 12:38:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA16332 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 12:38:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nak.myhouse.com (nak.myhouse.com [209.70.45.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA16302 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 12:38:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zoonie@myhouse.com) Received: from localhost (zoonie@localhost) by nak.myhouse.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA12692; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:37:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from zoonie@myhouse.com) X-Authentication-Warning: nak.myhouse.com: zoonie owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:37:15 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie To: Paul Saab cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... In-Reply-To: <19980305141634.06112@mu.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk thanks for the pointer, i should probably look at the freebsd FAQ more often and instead of the handbook now i know where the signal 11 FAQ is.... thanks again to everybody else that responded also.... On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Paul Saab wrote: > > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ71.html#71 > > Paul > > zoonie (zoonie@myhouse.com) wrote: > > ok, i'll look into that. i was wondering about that as i composed the > > message.....thanks.... > > > > BTW, somebody had mentioned a signal 11 FAQ a couple of months ago on this > > list and i looked around but didn't find it. does anybody know where it > > is located? > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > > > > > > > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make > > > > > > Your hardware is bad. > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 12:58:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA18889 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 12:58:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.jmrodgers.com ([205.247.224.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA18730 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 12:57:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from meuston@jmrodgers.com) Received: from max.jmrodgers.com (max.jmrodgers.com [205.247.224.209]) by mail.jmrodgers.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA02425; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:56:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from meuston@jmrodgers.com) Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:55:30 -0500 Message-ID: <01BD484F.1F519B20.meuston@jmrodgers.com> From: Max Euston To: "'obrien@NUXI.com'" , "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: is xntpd working in -STABLE? Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:55:27 -0500 Organization: J.M. Rodgers Co., Inc. X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk [ David: Sorry for the blank reply, my mouse got hyper for a moment :-) ] David, Funny, I just started working on this yesterday. I don't have a complete answer for you, but here are some data points: 1) Yes, xntpd DOES run on -stable (cvsup'ed and "make buildworld installworld" within about the last week). 2) I had the same symptom - the '-d' did no good either. 3) With all the variables I was trying, I'm not sure exactly how I got it working. 4) I had to make sure to open my firewall (I was also setting up ipfw for the first time) for udp port 123 (I know this is obvious, but it may or may not be the cause for the lack of output even w/ '-d'). 5) I used 'ntpdate -d' to get some more information when it was failing (and am running it now at bootup). 6) My drift file is empty, but I manually created /etc/ntp.{conf|drift|keys}. (I am still working on this). 7) From /etc/rc.conf: ntpdate_enable="YES" # Run the ntpdate to sync time (or NO). ntpdate_flags="-bs ntp.ctr.columbia.edu" # Flags to ntpdate (if enabled). xntpd_enable="YES" # Run xntpd Network Time Protocol (or NO). xntpd_flags="" # Flags to xntpd (if enabled). 8) From /etc/ntp.conf (minimal): server ntp.ctr.columbia.edu peer ns1 I didn't get to read my mail early today, so you may have already got this working. If not, let me know if I can give any further information. Max ----- Max Euston Sysadm, Programmer, etc... On Wednesday, March 04, 1998 5:26 PM, David O'Brien [SMTP:obrien@NUXI.com] wrote: > I've got no problems with xntpd on a 2.2.5-R box with -CURRENT kernel > from last week. > > BUT, on my two machines I've done a `make world' on it doesn't. > I can't get it to create a `/var/run/ntp.drift' file. I've taken the > /etc/ntp.conf file from the 2.2.5-R box and put it on the other two. No > help. Tried ``xntpd -d'' to get some debuging output. It just exits. > No explaintion, no output to the screen at all. /var/log/messages says: > > Mar 4 14:24:50 kongur xntpd[2261]: xntpd version=3.4e (beta multicast); > Sat Oct 4 12:04:05 GMT 1997 (1) > Mar 4 14:24:50 kongur xntpd[2261]: tickadj = 5, tick = 10000, > tvu_maxslew = 495 > > but xntpd wont deamonize. > > -- > -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 14:26:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA00217 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:26:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp.mastermind-tech.com ([38.181.52.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA29931 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:25:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lkatz@mastermind-tech.com) Received: from tower (slip166-72-74-151.dc.us.ibm.net [166.72.74.151]) by smtp.mastermind-tech.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA21346 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:14:34 -0500 Message-ID: <000b01bd4884$2b7d8050$010000c7@tower> Reply-To: "Lawrence Katz" From: "Lawrence Katz" To: Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:14:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 15:39:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA09665 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:39:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from firewall.scitec.com.au (firewall-user@fgate.scitec.com.au [203.17.180.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA09612 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:39:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john.saunders@scitec.com.au) Received: by firewall.scitec.com.au; id JAA20859; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:39:06 +1000 (EST) Received: from mailhub.scitec.com.au(203.17.180.131) by fgate.scitec.com.au via smap (3.2) id xma020825; Fri, 6 Mar 98 09:38:37 +1000 Received: from hydra.scitec.com.au (hydra.scitec.com.au [203.17.182.101]) by mailhub.scitec.com.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA22533; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:38:34 +1000 Received: from scitec.com.au (saruman.scitec.com.au) by hydra.scitec.com.au with ESMTP (1.40.112.8/16.2) id AA276191113; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 10:38:33 +1100 Message-Id: <34FF377A.181A4B33@scitec.com.au> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 10:38:34 +1100 From: John Saunders Organization: SCITEC LIMITED X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Withrow , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for next release References: <199803051335.IAA11684@spooky.rwwa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Robert Withrow wrote: > I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the > good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding > (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. Err, exactly what _is_ the live filesystem used for? I guess it could be mounted to give all the binaries if I ever have to boot from a rescue disk. But I've been lucky so far. What exactly do you use the unpacked source distribution for? I tried using the union filesystem to mount it so I could build directly off the CD. But union is broken so I ended up having to copy the source onto a harddisk anyway. Same with the CVS repository, you can't use it on the CD and have to copy to harddisk. Also it seems faster to extract the compressed tar files from the CD than to copy the unpacked version. So I never got the point of wasting all those CDs. :) Cheers. -- +------------------------------------------------------------+ . | John Saunders mailto:John.Saunders@scitec.com.au (Work) | ,--_|\ | mailto:john@nlc.net.au (Home) | / Oz \ | http://www.nlc.net.au/~john/ | \_,--\_/ | SCITEC LIMITED Phone +61 2 9428 9563 Fax +61 2 9428 9933 | v | "By the time you make ends meet, they move the ends." | +------------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 16:16:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA13897 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 16:16:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Octopussy.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (Octopussy.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.166.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA13772; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 16:14:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from se@dialup124.zpr.uni-koeln.de) Received: from dialup124.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE (dialup124.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.219.124]) by Octopussy.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA01558; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:47:47 +0100 (MET) Received: (from se@localhost) by dialup124.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.8.8/8.6.9) id AAA01552; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:47:06 +0100 (CET) X-Face: " Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:47:05 +0100 From: Stefan Esser To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Stefan Esser Subject: PCI LKM support: Need test results under 2.2.5 [se@FreeBSD.ORG: Re: PCI LKM's?] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk *********************************************************** I'd ***really*** love to see PCI LKM support make it into 2.2.6, but there is a problem, and I need help from users of FreeBSD-2.2.x. If you are intererested in this feature, then please build a patched kernel, and let me know what you find! *********************************************************** I had sent the message below to Danil O'Conner a few weeks ago, and he reported a problem with the *first* PCI device not being attached by a kernel compiled with this patch. The LKM code itself worked at a time (nearly one year ago), but there might be some unexpected side effect of the diffs. Since I do not have a 2.2.5 system to test this on myself (and since I'm short fo spare time), I'd appreciate more feedback about this set of patches. I did not touch the interrupt registration code, at least not knowingly :) Please let me know, whether a kernel compiled with this patch attaches all PCI devices. It will either work, or fail when probing for devices (best if you try booting with -s and just check for diagnostics at the start of the PCI probes). --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mutthy1553 On 1998-02-17 10:50 +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > I added PCI LKM support to the PCI code more than one year > > ago, but never put it into the "official" 2.2.x repository. > > If you want patches, I can provide you with them, but if > > there is sufficient interest, I can also commit that code > > to -stable. > I would like that very much :) Ok, since you offered to test the code, I've appended the diffs to /sys/pci/{pci.c,pcibus.h,pci_ioctl.h} and to /usr/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.{c,8} as separate attachments. Please apply and test them ... (As I explained before, I don't have any 2.2.x system to test them on. I compiled pci.c with those patches, and found that one chunk had gone to the wrong lines, causing a syntax error. This is fixed in the patches I'm sending, but I'm a little worried, that it might have happened in other less obvious places as well ...) > > The interface is very simple: > > > > int pci_register_lkm (struct pci_device *dvp, int if_revision) > What about unloading LKM's? Perhaps pci_unregister_lkm, which unlinks it from > the list and removes the lkm..? Well, unloading LKMs should be possible, and I could add support for that, but I didn't at the time, since I felt that the rest of the kernel wasn't yet up to it. AFAIK, there is no locking in place currently, which would prevent unloading a busy driver. If you have support for a shutdown function in your driver, then I could call that, and thereafter remove the driver from the list of known PCI devices in order to prepare the unload. > > I added a support function to pciconf (or rather the underlying > > ioctl()), which reported whether a driver had been attached to > > a device. This allowed the loading of PCI LKMs from a script > > called from /etc/rc, controlled by the PCI vendor and device > > IDs. > Thats neat, and IMHO is a good idea for making the system more flexible (ie > requiring less reboots :) Only, if unloading of PCI LKMs is supported, I'm afraid. If you need it, I can see what I can do within a few days, though I'm very busy and can't promise anything, currently. Regards, STefan --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="PCICONF-LKM.patch" Index: pciconf.c =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1.2.3 diff -u -2 -r1.1.1.1.2.3 pciconf.c --- pciconf.c 1997/10/08 07:36:44 1.1.1.1.2.3 +++ pciconf.c 1998/02/17 21:22:55 @@ -50,13 +50,16 @@ static void readit(const char *, const char *, int); static void writeit(const char *, const char *, const char *, int); +static void chkattached(const char *, int); +static exitstatus = 0; static void usage() { - fprintf(stderr, "%s\n%s\n%s\n", - "usage: pciconf -l", - " pciconf -r [-b | -h] sel addr", - " pciconf -w [-b | -h] sel addr [value]"); + fprintf(stderr, "%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n", + "usage: pciconf -l", + " pciconf -a sel", + " pciconf -r [-b | -h] sel addr", + " pciconf -w [-b | -h] sel addr [value]"); exit (1); } @@ -66,11 +69,15 @@ { int c; - int listmode, readmode, writemode; + int listmode, readmode, writemode, attachedmode; int byte, isshort; - listmode = readmode = writemode = byte = isshort = 0; + listmode = readmode = writemode = attachedmode = byte = isshort = 0; - while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "lrwbh")) != -1) { + while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "alrwbh")) != -1) { switch(c) { + case 'a': + attachedmode = 1; + break; + case 'l': listmode = 1; @@ -100,9 +107,13 @@ if ((listmode && optind != argc) || (writemode && optind + 3 != argc) - || (readmode && optind + 2 != argc)) + || (readmode && optind + 2 != argc) + || (attachedmode && optind + 1 != argc)) usage(); if (listmode) { list_devs(); + } else if(attachedmode) { + chkattached(argv[optind], + byte ? 1 : isshort ? 2 : 4); } else if(readmode) { readit(argv[optind], argv[optind + 1], @@ -115,5 +126,5 @@ } - return 0; + return exitstatus; } @@ -208,3 +219,25 @@ if (ioctl(fd, PCIOCWRITE, &pi) < 0) err(1, "ioctl(PCIOCWRITE)"); +} + +static void +chkattached (const char *name, int width) +{ + int fd; + struct pci_io pi; + + pi.pi_sel = getsel(name); + pi.pi_reg = 0; + pi.pi_width = width; + pi.pi_data = 0; + + fd = open(_PATH_DEVPCI, O_RDWR, 0); + if (fd < 0) + err(1, "%s", _PATH_DEVPCI); + + if (ioctl(fd, PCIOCATTACHED, &pi) < 0) + err(1, "ioctl(PCIOCATTACHED)"); + + exitstatus = pi.pi_data ? 0 : 2; /* exit(2), if NOT attached */ + printf("%s: %s%s\n", name, pi.pi_data == 0 ? "not " : "", "attached"); } Index: pciconf.8 =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.8,v retrieving revision 1.3.2.1 diff -u -2 -r1.3.2.1 pciconf.8 --- pciconf.8 1997/10/08 10:33:10 1.3.2.1 +++ pciconf.8 1998/02/17 21:28:24 @@ -33,4 +33,5 @@ .Sh SYNOPSIS .Nm pciconf Fl l +.Nm pciconf Fl a Ar selector .Nm pciconf Fl r Ar selector .Op Fl b | Fl h @@ -105,4 +106,14 @@ .Fl l can be used without modification. All numbers are base 10. +.Pp +With the +.Fl a +flag, +.Nm +determines whether any driver has been assigned to the device +identified by +.Ar selector . +An exit status of zero indicates that the device has a driver; +non-zero indicates that it does not. .Pp The --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=loadlkm #!/bin/sh # # Put this script into a new directory /etc/pci under the name "loadlkm" and # make /etc/rc call it early (may have to load network interface drivers). # # Put a file named "lkmtable" consisting of two columns (PCI vendor/device ID # and LKM name without trailing .o) into the same directory: # # 0x0350109E brkt BrookTree 848 # 0x802910ec if_ed RealTek 8029 NE2000 compatible Ethernet # # Put PCI LKMs into directory "/lkm/pci" for now (or change the script to # search for LKMs in some other directory). # for dev in `pciconf -l |cut -f1` do if pciconf -a $dev | grep -q "not attached" then DevVendorID=`pciconf -r $dev 0` LKM=`grep $DevVendorID /etc/pci/lkmtable | cut -f 2` LKMfile=/lkm/pci/$LKM.o echo "$dev Loading $LKMfile for DevVendorID $DevVendorID" modload $LKMfile fi done --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="PCI-LKM.patch" Index: pci.c =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/pci/pci.c,v retrieving revision 1.57.2.5 diff -u -2 -r1.57.2.5 pci.c --- pci.c 1997/07/11 18:16:18 1.57.2.5 +++ pci.c 1998/02/17 22:23:50 @@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ pcici_t pcicb_bridge; - u_long pcicb_seen; u_char pcicb_bus; u_char pcicb_subordinate; - u_char pcicb_flags; -#define PCICB_ISAMEM 0x01 u_int pcicb_mfrom; u_int pcicb_mupto; @@ -109,4 +106,9 @@ }; +struct pci_lkm { + struct pci_device *dvp; + struct pci_lkm *next; +}; + static void not_supported (pcici_t tag, u_long type); @@ -115,4 +117,10 @@ pci_bus_config (void); +static void +pci_rescan (void); + +static void pci_attach (int bus, int dev, int func, + struct pci_device *dvp, const char *name); + static int pci_bridge_config (void); @@ -121,5 +129,5 @@ pci_mfdev (int bus, int device); -static void pci_remember (int bus, int dev, int func); +static void pci_remember (int bus, int dev, int func, struct pci_device *dvp); /*======================================================== @@ -141,6 +149,4 @@ * UGLY hack ... :( Will be changed :) */ -static struct pcibus* pcibus; - /*-------------------------------------------------------- ** @@ -150,9 +156,17 @@ */ +static struct pcibus *pcibus; + static int pci_conf_count; static int pci_info_done; static int pcibusmax; -static struct pcicb *pcicb; +static struct pcicb *pcicb; + +static struct pci_conf *pci_dev_list; +static unsigned pci_dev_list_count; +static unsigned pci_dev_list_size; +static struct pci_lkm *pci_lkm_head; + /*----------------------------------------------------------------- ** @@ -375,4 +389,262 @@ /*======================================================== ** +** pci_attach() +** +** Attach one device +** +**======================================================== +*/ + +static void pci_attach (int bus, int dev, int func, + struct pci_device *dvp, const char *name) +{ + u_long data; + int unit; + u_char reg; + u_char pciint; + int irq; + pcici_t tag = pcibus->pb_tag (bus, dev, func); + + /* + ** Get and increment the unit. + */ + + unit = (*dvp->pd_count)++; + + /* + ** Announce this device + */ + + printf ("%s%d <%s> rev %d", dvp->pd_name, unit, name, + (unsigned) pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_CLASS_REG) & 0xff); + + /* + ** Get the int pin number (pci interrupt number a-d) + ** from the pci configuration space. + */ + + data = pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_INTERRUPT_REG); + pciint = PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN_EXTRACT(data); + + if (pciint) { + + printf (" int %c irq ", 0x60+pciint); + + irq = PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE_EXTRACT(data); + + /* + ** If it's zero, the isa irq number is unknown, + ** and we cannot bind the pci interrupt. + */ + + if (irq && (irq != 0xff)) + printf ("%d", irq); + else + printf ("??"); + }; + + printf (" on pci%d:%d:%d\n", bus, dev, func); + + /* + ** Read the current mapping, + ** and update the pcicb fields. + */ + + for (reg=PCI_MAP_REG_START;regpcicb_pamount += size; + break; + + case 0: + case 2: + case 4: + size = -(data & PCI_MAP_MEMORY_ADDRESS_MASK); + addr = map & PCI_MAP_MEMORY_ADDRESS_MASK; + if (addr >= 0x100000) { + pci_register_memory (pcicb, addr, addr+size-1); + pcicb->pcicb_mamount += size; + }; + break; + }; + if (bootverbose) + printf ("\tmapreg[%02x] type=%d addr=%08x size=%04x.\n", + reg, map&7, addr, size); + }; + + /* + ** attach device + ** may produce additional log messages, + ** i.e. when installing subdevices. + */ + + (*dvp->pd_attach) (tag, unit); + + /* + ** Special processing of certain classes + */ + + data = pci_conf_read(tag, PCI_CLASS_REG); + + switch (data & (PCI_CLASS_MASK|PCI_SUBCLASS_MASK)) { + struct pcicb *this, **link; + unsigned char primary, secondary, subordinate; + u_int command; + + case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE|PCI_SUBCLASS_BRIDGE_PCI: + + /* + ** get current configuration of the bridge. + */ + data = pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_BUS_REG); + primary = PCI_PRIMARY_BUS_EXTRACT (data); + secondary = PCI_SECONDARY_BUS_EXTRACT(data); + subordinate = PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS_EXTRACT(data); +#ifndef PCI_QUIET + if (bootverbose) { + printf ("\tbridge from pci%d to pci%d through %d.\n", + primary, secondary, subordinate); + printf ("\tmapping regs: io:%08lx mem:%08lx pmem:%08lx\n", + pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_IO_REG), + pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_MEM_REG), + pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_PMEM_REG)); + } +#endif + /* + ** check for uninitialized bridge. + */ + if (!(primary < secondary + && secondary <= subordinate + && bus == primary)) { + + printf ("\tINCORRECTLY or NEVER CONFIGURED.\n"); + /* + ** disable this bridge + */ + pci_conf_write (tag, PCI_COMMAND_STATUS_REG, 0xffff0000); + secondary = 0; + subordinate = 0; + }; + + /* + ** allocate bus descriptor for bus behind the bridge + */ + link = &pcicb->pcicb_down; + while (*link && (*link)->pcicb_bus < secondary) + link = &(*link)->pcicb_next; + + this = malloc (sizeof (*this), M_DEVBUF, M_WAITOK); + + /* + ** Initialize this descriptor so far. + ** (the initialization is completed just before + ** scanning the bus behind the bridge. + */ + bzero (this, sizeof(*this)); + this->pcicb_next = *link; + this->pcicb_up = pcicb; + this->pcicb_bridge = tag; + this->pcicb_bus = secondary; + this->pcicb_subordinate = subordinate; + + command = pci_conf_read(tag,PCI_COMMAND_STATUS_REG); + + if (command & PCI_COMMAND_IO_ENABLE){ + /* + ** Bridge was configured by the bios. + ** Read out the mapped io region. + */ + unsigned reg; + + reg = pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_IO_REG); + this->pcicb_iobase = PCI_PPB_IOBASE_EXTRACT (reg); + this->pcicb_iolimit = PCI_PPB_IOLIMIT_EXTRACT(reg); + + /* + ** Note the used io space. + */ + pci_register_io (pcicb, this->pcicb_iobase, + this->pcicb_iolimit); + + }; + + if (command & PCI_COMMAND_MEM_ENABLE) { + /* + ** Bridge was configured by the bios. + ** Read out the mapped memory regions. + */ + unsigned reg; + + /* + ** non prefetchable memory + */ + reg = pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_MEM_REG); + this->pcicb_membase = PCI_PPB_MEMBASE_EXTRACT (reg); + this->pcicb_memlimit = PCI_PPB_MEMLIMIT_EXTRACT(reg); + + /* + ** Register used memory space. + */ + pci_register_memory (pcicb, + this->pcicb_membase, + this->pcicb_memlimit); + + /* + ** prefetchable memory + */ + reg = pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_PMEM_REG); + this->pcicb_p_membase = PCI_PPB_MEMBASE_EXTRACT (reg); + this->pcicb_p_memlimit = PCI_PPB_MEMLIMIT_EXTRACT(reg); + + /* + ** Register used memory space. + */ + pci_register_memory (pcicb, + this->pcicb_p_membase, + this->pcicb_p_memlimit); + } + + /* + ** Link it in chain. + */ + *link=this; + + /* + ** Update mapping info of parent bus. + */ + if (!pcicb->pcicb_bfrom||secondary< pcicb->pcicb_bfrom) + pcicb->pcicb_bfrom = secondary; + if (subordinate > pcicb->pcicb_bupto) + pcicb->pcicb_bupto = subordinate; + } +} + +/*======================================================== +** ** pci_bus_config() ** @@ -405,8 +677,4 @@ pcici_t tag, mtag; pcidi_t type; - u_long data; - int unit; - u_char pciint; - int irq; struct pci_device *dvp; @@ -430,7 +698,4 @@ int func, maxfunc = 0; - if ((pcicb->pcicb_seen >> device) & 1) - continue; - for (func=0; func <= maxfunc; func++) { tag = pcibus->pb_tag (bus_no, device, func); @@ -498,5 +763,5 @@ } - pci_remember(bus_no, device, func); + pci_remember(bus_no, device, func, dvp); if (dvp==NULL) { @@ -515,267 +780,7 @@ continue; }; - - pcicb->pcicb_seen |= (1ul << device); - - /* - ** Get and increment the unit. - */ - - unit = (*dvp->pd_count)++; - - /* - ** ignore device ? - */ - - if (!*name) continue; - - /* - ** Announce this device - */ - - printf ("%s%d <%s> rev %d", dvp->pd_name, unit, name, - (unsigned) pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_CLASS_REG) & 0xff); - - /* - ** Get the int pin number (pci interrupt number a-d) - ** from the pci configuration space. - */ - - data = pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_INTERRUPT_REG); - pciint = PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN_EXTRACT(data); - - if (pciint) { - - printf (" int %c irq ", 0x60+pciint); - - irq = PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE_EXTRACT(data); - - /* - ** If it's zero, the isa irq number is unknown, - ** and we cannot bind the pci interrupt. - */ - - if (irq && (irq != 0xff)) - printf ("%d", irq); - else - printf ("??"); - }; - - if (maxfunc == 0) - printf (" on pci%d:%d\n", bus_no, device); - else - printf (" on pci%d:%d:%d\n", bus_no, device, func); - - /* - ** Read the current mapping, - ** and update the pcicb fields. - */ - - for (reg=PCI_MAP_REG_START;regpcicb_pamount += size; - break; - - case 0: - case 2: - case 4: - size = -(data & PCI_MAP_MEMORY_ADDRESS_MASK); - addr = map & PCI_MAP_MEMORY_ADDRESS_MASK; - if (addr >= 0x100000) { - pci_register_memory - (pcicb, addr, addr+size-1); - pcicb->pcicb_mamount += size; - } else { - pcicb->pcicb_flags |= PCICB_ISAMEM; - }; - break; - }; - if (bootverbose) - printf ("\tmapreg[%02x] type=%d addr=%08x size=%04x.\n", - reg, map&7, addr, size); - }; - - /* - ** attach device - ** may produce additional log messages, - ** i.e. when installing subdevices. - */ - - (*dvp->pd_attach) (tag, unit); - - /* - ** Special processing of certain classes - */ - - data = pci_conf_read(tag, PCI_CLASS_REG); - - switch (data & (PCI_CLASS_MASK|PCI_SUBCLASS_MASK)) { - struct pcicb *this, **link; - unsigned char primary, secondary, subordinate; - u_int command; - - case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE|PCI_SUBCLASS_BRIDGE_PCI: - - /* - ** get current configuration of the bridge. - */ - data = pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_BUS_REG); - primary = PCI_PRIMARY_BUS_EXTRACT (data); - secondary = PCI_SECONDARY_BUS_EXTRACT(data); - subordinate = PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS_EXTRACT(data); -#ifndef PCI_QUIET - if (bootverbose) { - printf ("\tbridge from pci%d to pci%d through %d.\n", - primary, secondary, subordinate); - printf ("\tmapping regs: io:%08lx mem:%08lx pmem:%08lx\n", - pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_IO_REG), - pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_MEM_REG), - pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_PMEM_REG)); - } -#endif - /* - ** check for uninitialized bridge. - */ - if (!(primary < secondary - && secondary <= subordinate - && bus_no == primary)) - { - printf ("\tINCORRECTLY or NEVER CONFIGURED.\n"); - /* - ** disable this bridge - */ - pci_conf_write (tag, PCI_COMMAND_STATUS_REG, - 0xffff0000); - secondary = 0; - subordinate = 0; - }; - /* - ** allocate bus descriptor for bus behind the bridge - */ - link = &pcicb->pcicb_down; - while (*link && (*link)->pcicb_bus < secondary) - link = &(*link)->pcicb_next; - - this = malloc (sizeof (*this), M_DEVBUF, M_WAITOK); - - /* - ** Initialize this descriptor so far. - ** (the initialization is completed just before - ** scanning the bus behind the bridge. - */ - bzero (this, sizeof(*this)); - this->pcicb_next = *link; - this->pcicb_up = pcicb; - this->pcicb_bridge = tag; - this->pcicb_bus = secondary; - this->pcicb_subordinate = subordinate; - - command = pci_conf_read(tag,PCI_COMMAND_STATUS_REG); - - if (command & PCI_COMMAND_IO_ENABLE){ - /* - ** Bridge was configured by the bios. - ** Read out the mapped io region. - */ - unsigned reg; - - reg = pci_conf_read (tag, - PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_IO_REG); - this->pcicb_iobase = - PCI_PPB_IOBASE_EXTRACT (reg); - this->pcicb_iolimit = - PCI_PPB_IOLIMIT_EXTRACT(reg); - - /* - ** Note the used io space. - */ - pci_register_io (pcicb, this->pcicb_iobase, - this->pcicb_iolimit); - - }; - - if (command & PCI_COMMAND_MEM_ENABLE) { - /* - ** Bridge was configured by the bios. - ** Read out the mapped memory regions. - */ - unsigned reg; - - /* - ** non prefetchable memory - */ - reg = pci_conf_read (tag, - PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_MEM_REG); - this->pcicb_membase = - PCI_PPB_MEMBASE_EXTRACT (reg); - this->pcicb_memlimit = - PCI_PPB_MEMLIMIT_EXTRACT(reg); - - /* - ** Register used memory space. - */ - pci_register_memory (pcicb, - this->pcicb_membase, - this->pcicb_memlimit); - - /* - ** prefetchable memory - */ - reg = pci_conf_read (tag, - PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_PMEM_REG); - this->pcicb_p_membase= - PCI_PPB_MEMBASE_EXTRACT (reg); - this->pcicb_p_memlimit= - PCI_PPB_MEMLIMIT_EXTRACT(reg); - - /* - ** Register used memory space. - */ - pci_register_memory (pcicb, - this->pcicb_p_membase, - this->pcicb_p_memlimit); - } - - /* - ** Link it in chain. - */ - *link=this; - - /* - ** Update mapping info of parent bus. - */ - if (!pcicb->pcicb_bfrom||secondary< pcicb->pcicb_bfrom) - pcicb->pcicb_bfrom = secondary; - if (subordinate > pcicb->pcicb_bupto) - pcicb->pcicb_bupto = subordinate; - - break; + if (*name) { + pci_attach (bus_no, device, func, dvp, name); } } @@ -785,10 +790,10 @@ if (bootverbose) { if (pcicb->pcicb_mamount) - printf ("%s%d: uses %d bytes of memory from %x upto %x.\n", + printf ("%s%d: uses %u bytes of memory from %x upto %x.\n", pcibus->pb_name, bus_no, pcicb->pcicb_mamount, pcicb->pcicb_mfrom, pcicb->pcicb_mupto); if (pcicb->pcicb_pamount) - printf ("%s%d: uses %d bytes of I/O space from %x upto %x.\n", + printf ("%s%d: uses %u bytes of I/O space from %x upto %x.\n", pcibus->pb_name, bus_no, pcicb->pcicb_pamount, @@ -808,7 +813,4 @@ ** Autoconfiguration of pci devices. ** -** May be called more than once. -** Any device is attached only once. -** ** Has to take care of mirrored devices, which are ** entailed by incomplete decoding of pci address lines. @@ -872,4 +874,83 @@ } +/*======================================================== +** +** pci_rescan () +** +** try to find lkm driver for device +** +** May be called more than once. +** Any device is attached only once. +** +**======================================================== +*/ + +static void pci_rescan() +{ + int i; + for (i = 0; i < pci_dev_list_count; i++) + { + struct pci_lkm *lkm; + pcici_t tag; + struct pci_device *dvp; + pcidi_t type = pci_dev_list[i].pc_devid; + char *name = NULL; + int bus, dev, func; + + if (pci_dev_list[i].pc_dvp) + continue; + + bus = pci_dev_list[i].pc_sel.pc_bus; + dev = pci_dev_list[i].pc_sel.pc_dev; + func = pci_dev_list[i].pc_sel.pc_func; + + tag = pcibus->pb_tag (bus, dev, func); + + for (lkm = pci_lkm_head; lkm; lkm = lkm->next) { + dvp = lkm->dvp; + if (name=(*dvp->pd_probe)(tag, type)) + break; + } + if (name && *name) { + pcicb = pci_dev_list[i].pc_cb; + pci_attach (bus, dev, func, dvp, name); + pci_dev_list[i].pc_dvp = dvp; + } + } +} + +/*======================================================== +** +** pci_register_lkm () +** +** Add LKM PCI driver's struct pci_device to pci_lkm chain +** +**======================================================== +*/ + +int pci_register_lkm (struct pci_device *dvp, int if_revision) +{ + struct pci_lkm *lkm; + + if (if_revision != 0) { + return -1; + } + + if (!dvp || !dvp->pd_probe || !dvp->pd_attach) { + return -1; + } + + lkm = malloc (sizeof (*lkm), M_DEVBUF, M_WAITOK); + if (!lkm) { + return -1; + } + + lkm->dvp = dvp; + lkm->next = pci_lkm_head; + pci_lkm_head = lkm; + pci_rescan(); + return 0; +} + /*----------------------------------------------------------------------- ** @@ -899,10 +980,4 @@ }; - /*if (pcicb->pcicb_flags & PCICB_NOIOSET) { - printf ("pci_map_port failed: pci%d has not been configured for I/O access\n", - pcicb->pcicb_bus); - return (0); - }*/ - /* ** get size and type of port @@ -982,5 +1057,5 @@ struct pcicb *link = pcicb; unsigned data ,paddr; - vm_size_t psize, poffs; + vm_size_t psize, poffs, pend; vm_offset_t vaddr; @@ -1025,4 +1100,5 @@ psize = -(data & PCI_MAP_MEMORY_ADDRESS_MASK); + pend = paddr + psize -1; if (!paddr || paddr == PCI_MAP_MEMORY_ADDRESS_MASK) { @@ -1032,20 +1108,20 @@ return (0); }; - pci_register_memory (pcicb, paddr, paddr+psize-1); + pci_register_memory (pcicb, paddr, pend); }; - if (paddr < pcicb->pcicb_membase || - paddr + psize - 1 > pcicb->pcicb_memlimit) { - printf ("pci_map_mem failed: device's memrange 0x%x-0x%x is " - "incompatible with its bridge's memrange 0x%x-0x%x\n", + if (!((pcicb->pcicb_membase <= paddr && + pend <= pcicb->pcicb_memlimit) || + (pcicb->pcicb_p_membase <= paddr && + pend <= pcicb->pcicb_p_memlimit))) { + printf ("pci_map_mem: device's memrange 0x%x-0x%x is " + "incompatible with its bridge's\n" + "\tmemrange 0x%x-0x%x and prefetchable memrange 0x%x-0x%x\n", (unsigned) paddr, (unsigned) (paddr + psize - 1), + (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_p_membase, + (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_p_memlimit, (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_membase, (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_memlimit); -/* return (0);*/ -/* ACHTUNG: Ist der Code richtig, wenn eine PCI-PCI-Bridge fuer - * die PCI-Slots verwendet wird, aber die Onboard-Devices direkt - * an der CPU-PCI-Bridge haengen (Siehe Compaq Prolinea Problem) ??? - */ } pci_conf_write (tag, reg, paddr); @@ -1463,8 +1539,10 @@ {0x1045, "OPTI"}, {0x104B, "Bus Logic"}, + {0x104C, "TI"}, {0x1060, "UMC"}, {0x1080, "Contaq"}, {0x1095, "CMD"}, {0x10b9, "ACER Labs"}, + {0x10c8, "NeoMagic"}, {0x1106, "VIA Technologies"}, {0x5333, "S3 Inc."}, @@ -1544,4 +1622,5 @@ { 0x04, "pci" }, { 0x05, "pcmcia"}, + { 0x07, "cardbus"}, { 0x80, "misc" }, { 0x00, NULL } @@ -1565,5 +1644,11 @@ "multimedia", "memory", - "bridge" + "bridge", + "comms", + "system", + "input", + "docking", + "processor", + "serial" }; @@ -1613,5 +1698,5 @@ printf(" (%s)", p->name); } else { - printf(" (unknown subclass 0x%02lx)", subclass); + printf(" (unknown subclass 0x%02x)", subclass); } } else { @@ -1647,6 +1732,6 @@ printf ("configuration space registers:"); for (reg = 0; reg < 0x100; reg+=4) { - if ((reg & 0x0f) == 0) printf ("\n%02x:\t", reg); - printf ("%08x ", pci_conf_read (tag, reg)); + if ((reg & 0x0f) == 0) printf ("\n%02lx:\t", reg); + printf ("%08lx ", pci_conf_read (tag, reg)); } printf ("\n"); @@ -1659,17 +1744,17 @@ case 1: case 5: - printf ("\tmap(%x): io(%04lx)\n", + printf ("\tmap(%lx): io(%04lx)\n", reg, data & ~3); break; case 0: - printf ("\tmap(%x): mem32(%08lx)\n", + printf ("\tmap(%lx): mem32(%08lx)\n", reg, data & ~7); break; case 2: - printf ("\tmap(%x): mem20(%05lx)\n", + printf ("\tmap(%lx): mem20(%05lx)\n", reg, data & ~7); break; case 4: - printf ("\tmap(%x): mem64(%08x%08lx)\n", + printf ("\tmap(%lx): mem64(%08lx%08lx)\n", reg, pci_conf_read (tag, reg +4), data & ~7); reg += 4; @@ -1684,10 +1769,8 @@ * This is the user interface to the PCI configuration space. */ -static struct pci_conf *pci_dev_list; -static unsigned pci_dev_list_count; -static unsigned pci_dev_list_size; + static void -pci_remember(int bus, int dev, int func) +pci_remember(int bus, int dev, int func, struct pci_device *dvp) { struct pci_conf *p; @@ -1723,4 +1806,6 @@ p->pc_devid = pci_conf_read(tag, PCI_ID_REG); p->pc_class = pci_conf_read(tag, PCI_CLASS_REG); + p->pc_dvp = dvp; + p->pc_cb = pcicb; switch (p->pc_hdr & 0x7f) { case 0: @@ -1803,4 +1888,32 @@ pci_conf_write(tag, io->pi_reg, io->pi_data); error = 0; + break; + case 2: + case 1: + default: + error = ENODEV; + break; + } + break; + + case PCIOCATTACHED: + io = (struct pci_io *)data; + switch(io->pi_width) { + case 4: + { + int i = pci_dev_list_count; + struct pci_conf *p = pci_dev_list; + error = ENODEV; + while (i--) { + if (io->pi_sel.pc_bus == p->pc_sel.pc_bus && + io->pi_sel.pc_dev == p->pc_sel.pc_dev && + io->pi_sel.pc_func == p->pc_sel.pc_func) { + io->pi_data = (u_int32_t)p->pc_dvp; + error = 0; + break; + } + p++; + } + } break; case 2: Index: pcibus.h =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/pci/Attic/pcibus.h,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -2 -r1.4 pcibus.h --- pcibus.h 1996/01/30 22:59:55 1.4 +++ pcibus.h 1998/02/17 22:04:42 @@ -80,5 +80,4 @@ u_long (*pb_read ) (pcici_t tag, u_long reg); void (*pb_write ) (pcici_t tag, u_long reg, u_long data); - unsigned pb_maxirq; int (*pb_iattach) (int irq, inthand2_t *func, int arg, unsigned *maskptr); @@ -95,4 +94,6 @@ extern struct linker_set pcibus_set; + +int pci_register_lkm (struct pci_device *dvp, int if_revision); #endif Index: pci_ioctl.h =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/pci/pci_ioctl.h,v retrieving revision 1.1.2.1 diff -u -2 -r1.1.2.1 pci_ioctl.h --- pci_ioctl.h 1996/11/25 07:19:06 1.1.2.1 +++ pci_ioctl.h 1998/02/17 22:04:42 @@ -16,4 +16,6 @@ pcidi_t pc_subid; /* subvendor ID */ u_int32_t pc_class; /* device class */ + struct pci_device *pc_dvp; /* device driver pointer or NULL */ + struct pcicb *pc_cb; /* pointer to bus parameters */ }; @@ -34,4 +36,5 @@ #define PCIOCREAD _IOWR('p', 2, struct pci_io) #define PCIOCWRITE _IOWR('p', 3, struct pci_io) +#define PCIOCATTACHED _IOWR('p', 4, struct pci_io) #endif /* _PCI_IOCTL_H */ --liOOAslEiF7prFVr-- ----- End forwarded message ----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 16:40:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA18167 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 16:40:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA18083 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 16:39:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA13115; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 16:37:28 -0800 (PST) To: John Saunders cc: Robert Withrow , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for next release In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Mar 1998 10:38:34 +1100." <34FF377A.181A4B33@scitec.com.au> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 16:37:28 -0800 Message-ID: <13110.889144648@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > What exactly do you use the unpacked source distribution for? I tried > using the union filesystem to mount it so I could build directly off > the CD. But union is broken so I ended up having to copy the source lndir, from the XFree86 distribution, is your friend. You can build a link tree to it which uses a fair number of inodes still but nowhere near as much free space. > onto a harddisk anyway. Same with the CVS repository, you can't use > it on the CD and have to copy to harddisk. Also it seems faster to setenv CVSREADONLYFS yes setenv CVSROOT /cdrom/CVSROOT Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 17:01:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA20568 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:01:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tok.qiv.com (TXBZJ3ads6fxtWAcYjG0tfymUreuJJzE@tok.qiv.com [204.214.141.211]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA20361 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:00:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdn@acp.qiv.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tok.qiv.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with UUCP id TAA26629 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 19:00:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (jdn@localhost) by acp.qiv.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA01185 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:50:28 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:50:28 -0600 (CST) From: Jay Nelson To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: UUCP request for next release Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Would it be possible to uncomment the HDB config capabilities in UUCP's policy.h for the next release? -- Jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 17:12:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA21835 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:12:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA21825 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:12:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA27370; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:10:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803060110.RAA27370@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Jay Nelson cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UUCP request for next release In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Mar 1998 18:50:28 CST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 17:09:58 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Would it be possible to uncomment the HDB config capabilities in > UUCP's policy.h for the next release? This was supposed to have been done ages ago, but it must have been missed at the "doing it" stage. Unless someone remembers that it was their job, I should do this. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 17:41:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA25069 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:41:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA25058 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:41:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA13449; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:40:08 -0800 (PST) To: Jay Nelson cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UUCP request for next release In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Mar 1998 18:50:28 CST." Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 17:40:08 -0800 Message-ID: <13446.889148408@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I thought that was already done? > Would it be possible to uncomment the HDB config capabilities in > UUCP's policy.h for the next release? > > -- Jay > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 18:55:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA03872 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:55:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA03844; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:55:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA18269; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 02:27:23 GMT (envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199803060227.CAA18269@awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mgetty and iij-ppp In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Mar 1998 11:29:09 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 02:27:23 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Hi > > I'm trying to use mgetty (v1.0) to drive ppp (as explained in the > handbook : I've recompiled mgetty with AutoPPP support). I'm using > FreeBSD v2.2.5, installed from a CDROM. > > I've got a problem : the initial connection (from a W**-95 client) is > done all right (I can ping an machine from the client through the > Ethernet I/F of my FreeBSD machine), but ppp does not stop after the > end of the connection. Thus, mgetty is never awakened, and I can't > make another connection from the client to the FreeBSD server (because > ppp does not know how to answer the modem call). > > Do I need to patch ppp, so that it "exit()s" when the ppp connection > is over or is there a newer version of ppp ? (or am I missing some > black magic in the configuration files ?) > > Thanks in advance As others have already said, ppp in 2.2.5 if broken in this respect. You can get the latest version from http://www.FreeBSD.org/~brian. > TfH > > Work : thierry.herbelot@telspace.alcatel.fr > Home : thierry.herbelot@wanadoo.fr -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 18:55:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA03895 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:55:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA03845; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:55:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA18278; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 02:28:04 GMT (envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199803060228.CAA18278@awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: "James Gardiner" cc: "Atipa" , THIERRY.HERBELOT@telspace.alcatel.fr, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mgetty and iij-ppp In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Mar 1998 11:53:17 +1000." <000501bd47d9$77dd9e90$6b580cca@encoder.planetx.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 02:28:04 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > >Upgrade to the newest ppp. 2.2.5 is broken. > > > What about 2.2.stable? > > James That works ok. -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 18:56:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA04230 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:56:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hilda.sci.usq.edu.au (hilda.sci.usq.edu.au [139.86.144.152]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA03849 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:55:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vance@usq.edu.au) Received: (qmail 24234 invoked by uid 205); 6 Mar 1998 02:54:45 -0000 Message-ID: <19980306025444.24233.qmail@hilda.sci.usq.edu.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 X-Face: VBG60|k'4FzQAk.lEL//A=jDc@.*^5c^^(#755qSb~E~lhP7%JOW!_)Oauu?Y(|)0Xn|UBK Wb$c5EvA>x<^g&TNFNLS9}\FDFw{F,b8%u%>Xb_2}4b}p X-PGP: RSA/---/--- 1024/49D16ABD 1997/11/04 X-PGP: RSA/---/--- 7D 43 B4 CC 96 8B 51 14 B8 28 ED 99 B5 6F 21 4B X-PGP: ---/DSS/--- 1024/6501F2F1 1997-11-04 X-PGP: ---/DSS/--- 7D65 5882 B458 4B1B E2CA F62E 99CE 9009 6501 F2F1 X-PGP: ---/---/D-H 2048/E81EAB5A 1997-11-04 X-PGP: ---/---/D-H 2161 455C 0E5A D467 D538 FBEF BB2F 3B73 E81E AB5A Organization: The University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba X-Disclaimer: views expressed do not even purport to represent the University X-URI: http://www.sci.usq.edu.au/staff/vance/ To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: bind Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 12:54:44 +1000 From: Christopher JS Vance Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I'm running -STABLE off cvsup, making most nightly and world occasionally, but I've had to hack on /usr/src slightly to stop it overwriting my bind 8 and qmail. I can't expect the sendmail situation to change but one could ask: Which version of BIND will go in 2.2.6-R and later -STABLEs? And while I'm at it, should I assume that perl will stay at 4? I'm not feeling quite adventurous enough to use -CURRENT. -- Christopher To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 19:22:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA09900 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 19:22:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA09795; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 19:21:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA14627; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:59:10 -0800 (PST) To: Christopher JS Vance cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bind In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Mar 1998 12:54:44 +1000." <19980306025444.24233.qmail@hilda.sci.usq.edu.au> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 18:59:10 -0800 Message-ID: <14623.889153150@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I can't expect the sendmail situation to change but one could ask: > Which version of BIND will go in 2.2.6-R and later -STABLEs? The same one that shipped with 2.2.5. > And while I'm at it, should I assume that perl will stay at 4? Yep. We've still yet to find someone to bmake perl5 and get it into the proper shape for inclusion in -current, much less -stable. :( Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 19:51:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA15896 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 19:51:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mercury.acs.unt.edu (mercury.acs.unt.edu [129.120.220.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA15886; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 19:51:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@www.cas.unt.edu) Received: from www.cas.unt.edu (www.cas.unt.edu [129.120.3.150]) by mercury.acs.unt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA22510; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 21:51:28 -0600 (CST) Received: (from john@localhost) by www.cas.unt.edu (8.8.7/8.6.9) id VAA14931; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 21:49:12 -0600 (CST) From: john Message-Id: <199803060349.VAA14931@www.cas.unt.edu> Subject: Re: bmake In-Reply-To: <14623.889153150@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Mar 5, 98 06:59:10 pm" To: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 21:49:12 -0600 (CST) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > And while I'm at it, should I assume that perl will stay at 4? > > Yep. We've still yet to find someone to bmake perl5 and get it into > the proper shape for inclusion in -current, much less -stable. :( I don't like to sound stupid, but what is bmaking? Also what is considered proper shape? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 22:46:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA13842 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 22:46:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA13747 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 22:46:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA23771 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 22:46:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 22:46:17 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk fyi. I sent David Greenman some info about a fatal trap 12 - page fault in kernel mode panic I'm getting with this morning's -stable kernel. it stops cvsup to my ccd /home cold in about the same place every time. #10 0xf01304d7 in getnewbuf (slpflag=0, slptimeo=0, size=3072, maxsize=8192) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:957#10 0xf01304d7 in getnewbuf (slpflag=0, slptimeo=0, size=3072, maxsize=8192) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:957 -Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 23:03:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA18744 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 23:03:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from beach.utmb.edu (beach.utmb.edu [129.109.212.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA18497 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 23:02:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from POSTMASTER@MSPO2.MED.UTMB.EDU) From: POSTMASTER@MSPO2.MED.UTMB.EDU Received: from GALV8TH.utmb.edu by BEACH.UTMB.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #18539) with SMTP id <01IUBSVXKGOW0003XM@BEACH.UTMB.EDU> for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:59:37 CDT Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 01:01:00 -0600 Subject: Mail failure To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <01IUBSVXMHTU0003XM@BEACH.UTMB.EDU> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Worldtalk (NetConnex V4.00a)/MIME Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id XAA18529 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk FROM: UTMB/MSPO2/POSTMASTER TO: stable@FreeBSD.ORG DATE: 03-06-98 TIME: 01:02 SUBJECT: Mail failure ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [002] Mail was received that was addressed to unknown addresses. Mail item was not delivered to: UTMB/MSPO2/ehymel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ stable-digest Thursday, March 5 1998 Volume 04 : Number 026 In this issue: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA problems with de driver for quad card Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: problems with de driver for quad card Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: 'make world': /bin/sh not found Compile failure on gctags Request for next release Re: Compile failure on gctags Re: Request for next release Re: Compile failure on gctags Re: Request for next release Re: Compile failure on gctags Re: Request for next release Re: Request for next release Re: Request for next release Re: Request for next release RAID Controllers -stable suitable for small-enterprise NFS server? problem compiling stable yesterday..... Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... Re: RAID Controllers Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... RE: is xntpd working in -STABLE? [none] Re: Request for next release PCI LKM support: Need test results under 2.2.5 [se@FreeBSD.ORG: Re: PCI LKM's?] Re: Request for next release UUCP request for next release Re: UUCP request for next release Re: UUCP request for next release Re: mgetty and iij-ppp Re: mgetty and iij-ppp bind Re: bind Re: bmake panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 21:22:48 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA .. will be Monday, March 9th. That means all general merge work and general sysinstall hackery must be done by 1:00PM PST on that day so that we may enter the BETA test cycle and start regression testing. Daily snapshots of the BETA bits will be made available as usual in ftp://releng22.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD. The BETA period for 2.2.6 will end on the 24th of March at 1:00AM PST, e.g. just a little after the 23rd of March has ended. :) I will be tagging the tree in preparation for 2.2.6 release at that time. Actually meeting a planned-in-advance deadline would also be a new thing around here and I'm going to do my darndest to see that it happens for once. :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 22:21:36 -0800 From: Studded Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > ... will be Monday, March 9th. So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) Doug - -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 15:47:52 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA >> ... will be Monday, March 9th. > > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to >the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or >perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:20:47 -0800 From: Studded Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: > > >> ... will be Monday, March 9th. > > > > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to > >the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or > >perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) > > I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts before you state your opinions. Check out http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. Doug - -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 02:38:03 -0500 From: "Prashant R. Chandra" Subject: problems with de driver for quad card Hi! All, Please forgive me if this question has been asked before on the mailing list. I want to report a problem we are facing with the driver for the Zynx ZX346 Quad PCI ethernet card. When two of these cards are connected back-to-back (in two Pentium II PCs) the configuration seems to go haywire. The cards come up complaining that autosense failed and if I use ifconfig to set the media type to 100baseTX on both ends, I get connectivity but I have problem with bidirectional traffic. Ping seems to work fine, but doing a TCP bandwidth test using ttcp fails because packets are being dropped on the point-to-point link between the two cards. (Fails means the TCP bandwidth is only about 0.8 Mbps or so). Another problem is that I cannot get the link to operate at 10 Mbps. If I set the media to 10baseT/UTP, the interface reports that it has 'no carrier'. I have repeated the exact same tests with Windows NT 4.0 and everything seems to be fine (TCP bandwidth of 93 Mbps). Everything is also fine when one end of the link is a Dec Alpha workstation with a 100 Mbps ethernet interface (not the same quad board). The problem only happens when two quad cards are connected back to back in FreeBSD PCs. The problem seems to be due to misconfiguration of full-duplex/half-duplex operation. The list of supported media types for the de driver does not include 100baseTX and 10baseT/UTP . What is the reason? (the hardware supports full-duplex operation) The version of FreeBSD we are using is FreeBSD 2.2.5. We also see this problem with NetBSD 1.3. It is not suprising since the driver is the same. I had posted this message on the NetBSD mailing list a month ago and got no reply. Hopefully I will have better luck this time :-). If anyone out there has tried the quad cards in a back-to-configuration (using a null-cable) and has encountered similar problems please let me know. Any suggestions on how to tackle this will be greatly appreciated. Please reply directly to prashant@cs.cmu.edu. Thank you. -prashant PS: The exact ifconfig command we use to bring up the interfaces as 100Mbps is: ifconfig de0 192.200.51.1 255.255.255.0 192.200.51.255 media 100baseTX up - -- ____________________________________________________ R. Prashant Chandra e-mail: prashant@cs.cmu.edu Web: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~prashant Phone: 412-268-2580 (Office) 412-268-7560 (Lab) 412-681-3829 (Home) ____________________________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:40:54 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to > the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or > perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) I don't know the answer to this yet. We'll have to see. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:48:58 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA > > I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. > > Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things > you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts > before you state your opinions. Check out > http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. I agree, uninformed guessing can be a bad thing. What guess lies behind your claim that XFree86 3.3.2 will be based on X11R6.4? Just because it's available internally to consortium members is by no means a declaration that the XFree86 project intends to track it in their upcoming point release of 3.3.2 and, in fact, I'd say that it'd be a very bad guess indeed to assume such a thing. :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:10:09 -0800 From: Michael Oski Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R63. > > > > Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things > > you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts > > before you state your opinions. Check out > > http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. > > I agree, uninformed guessing can be a bad thing. What guess lies > behind your claim that XFree86 3.3.2 will be based on X11R6.4? Just > because it's available internally to consortium members is by no means > a declaration that the XFree86 project intends to track it in their > upcoming point release of 3.3.2 and, in fact, I'd say that it'd be a > very bad guess indeed to assume such a thing. :-) > > Jordan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message Ah, the joy of rash assumptions.... FYI - XFree86 v3.3.2 is still based on X11R6.3, you can verify by checking the release notes included in the .tgz's. Also, www.XFree86.org claims they have no scheduled release date for version 4.0. Now here's my assumption: this is most likely the first based on X11R6.4 ;-) Michael! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 17:20:31 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA >> > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to ~~~~~~~ >> >the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or >> >perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) >> >> I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. > > Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things >you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts >before you state your opinions. Check out >http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. Nothing personal, but aren't you rather confusing the Open Group and the XFree86 Project Inc? XFree86 is primarily developed and distributed by the XFree86 Project Inc. The code is, of course, derived from that of the Open Group. But, it does not necessarily mean that the latest release from the XFree86 always matches the latest release of X11. In fact http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/r6.4doc/relnotes/relnotes.htm mentions XFree86 3.3.1 which was released in Aug. 97 and is based on X11R6.3pl2. You had better check out the XFree86 web site: http://www.xfree86.org/ rather than the Open Group's, for the latest information and status of XFree86. Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:30:21 +0100 (CET) From: Andre Albsmeier Subject: Re: problems with de driver for quad card > Hi! All, > Please forgive me if this question has been asked before on the > mailing > list. I want to report a problem we are facing with the driver for the > Zynx ZX346 Quad PCI ethernet card. When two of these cards are > connected > back-to-back (in two Pentium II PCs) the configuration seems to go > haywire. > The cards come up complaining that autosense failed and if I use > ifconfig > to set the media type to 100baseTX on both ends, I get connectivity but > I have problem with bidirectional traffic. Ping seems to work fine, but > doing a TCP bandwidth test using ttcp fails because packets are being > dropped on the point-to-point link between the two cards. (Fails means > the TCP bandwidth is only about 0.8 Mbps or so). Another problem is > that > I cannot get the link to operate at 10 Mbps. If I set the media to > 10baseT/UTP, > the interface reports that it has 'no carrier'. The de driver is broken regarding the media selection. (PR 4841). I had some email exchange with Matt Thomas concerning this but haven't heard from him for approx. 2 month. I gave it up now and will keep on using the old version 1.54.2.6 which works for my SMC 8434BT. -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:57:57 -0800 From: Studded Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: > > >> > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to > ~~~~~~~ Please don't assume I don't know what I mean. I asked the question I wanted to ask. What I should have made more clear is that the open group's ftp site was the one I was referring to. > Nothing personal, but aren't you rather confusing the Open Group and > the XFree86 Project Inc? Nope, sorry I wasn't more clear. > XFree86 is primarily developed and distributed by the XFree86 Project > Inc. The code is, of course, derived from that of the Open Group. > But, it does not necessarily mean that the latest release from the > XFree86 always matches the latest release of X11. > You had better check out the XFree86 web site: > http://www.xfree86.org/ > rather than the Open Group's, for the latest information and status > of XFree86. I did, and there was no mention of anything beyond 3.3.1. Anyway, I've spent all day arguing with a pita solaris machine, and I am too tired to really give a rip. My apologies for any offense. Doug - -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:01:44 +0000 From: nik@iii.co.uk Subject: Re: 'make world': /bin/sh not found On Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 01:49:36AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > This is an odd one. I'm trying to update my 2.2.5-stable system to the > > latest -stable. My last successful 'make world' was on Jan 31 this > > year. > > Just a suggestion: cp /usr/src/share/mk/* /usr/share/mk > I suspect that your bsd.info.mk file may be spooged. No joy. Something I neglected to mention was that I can go into the appropriate directory and run the 'make clean' by hand it works with no problems. It looks as though I'm hitting some sort of resource limit, but I can't find where. Very odd. N - -- Work: nik@iii.co.uk | FreeBSD + Perl + Apache Rest: nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk | Remind me again why we need Play: nik@freebsd.org | Microsoft? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: 05 Mar 1998 13:10:31 +0100 From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Subject: Compile failure on gctags In yesterday's STABLE (fetched from ftp.de.freebsd.org), the build fails like this: /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c: In function `c_entries': /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: `rflag' undeclared (first use this function) /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: for each function it appears in.) I think that one occurrence of rtag needs to be protected by an #ifdef GTAGS - -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 08:35:50 -0500 From: Robert Withrow Subject: Request for next release If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the CD's are used for? I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. But when the 2.2.5 release came out I did't have a clue about what to do with my 4 CD riches... ;-) - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA, witr@rwwa.COM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:36:03 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons Subject: Re: Compile failure on gctags What, without even my mangling hands stirring things up? I'll take a look momentarily. - -Chris On 5 Mar 1998, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote: > > In yesterday's STABLE (fetched from ftp.de.freebsd.org), the build > fails like this: > > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c: In function `c_entries': > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: `rflag' undeclared (first use this function) > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: for each function it appears in) > > I think that one occurrence of rtag needs to be protected by an > > #ifdef GTAGS > > -- > Cheers =8-} Mike > Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 05:45:53 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: Request for next release > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > CD's are used for? Yes, that's already planned along with updated installation instructions. The next booklet will be a total rewrite, essentially. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 06:20:54 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons Subject: Re: Compile failure on gctags Michael, I didn't see it at first, but now I do: global is contribified in -stable, so there shouldn't be ANY program source files under src/usr.bin/global. I just built it here without any problem. The question is, what's up with your sources? I'm not sure how you are updating your sources, but you should use CVSup. See the FreeBSD Handbook at http://www.freebsd.org for instructions on how to do that. If you are ftp'ing the CVS repository, that is a sure way to run amok - retrieve that with CVSup as well. If you are updating your tree with CVS, you must say 'cvs update -Pd -rRELENG_2_2' in /usr/src. Regards, - -Chris On 5 Mar 1998, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote: > > In yesterday's STABLE (fetched from ftp.de.freebsd.org), the build > fails like this: > > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c: In function `c_entries': > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: `rflag' undeclared (first use this function) > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: for each function it appears in) > > I think that one occurrence of rtag needs to be protected by an > > #ifdef GTAGS > > -- > Cheers =8-} Mike > Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:20:26 +0300 From: "Igor Sysoev" Subject: Re: Request for next release > > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > > CD's are used for? > > Yes, that's already planned along with updated installation > instructions. The next booklet will be a total rewrite, essentially. What' s about FAQ and Handbook ? Will be they included in HTML format ? with best regards, Igor Sysoev To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: 05 Mar 1998 17:03:00 +0100 From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Subject: Re: Compile failure on gctags >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Timmons writes: Chris> Michael, Chris> I didn't see it at first, but now I do: global is contribified Chris> in -stable, I'm new to -STABLE, so I don't know what that means or how to fix it. Chris> so there shouldn't be ANY program source files under Chris> src/usr.bin/global. Can I just rm -rf that directory? Chris> I just built it here without any problem. The question is, what's up with Chris> your sources? Nothing. I pulled src.tar off /ftp.de.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-stable as per the Handbook instructions. Anything wrong with that? Chris> I'm not sure how you are updating your sources, but you should Chris> use CVSup. I can't because there's a networking bug in FreeBSD 2.2.5 that makes network writes fail (duly reported). That's actually the *reason* I want to compile stable at all---I have a faint hope it's fixed there. Catch-22 dadadadadaaaaaaaaaaaa - -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:46:38 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund Subject: Re: Request for next release On Thu, Mar 05, 1998 at 05:20:26PM +0300, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > > > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > > > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > > > CD's are used for? > > > > Yes, that's already planned along with updated installation > > instructions. The next booklet will be a total rewrite, essentially. > > What' s about FAQ and Handbook ? Will be they included in HTML format ? I'm fairly certain the FAQ and handbook are automatically built for the distribution now. There was a flurry of commits (by Jordan) some time back to make this possible. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 09:19:33 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: Request for next release > What' s about FAQ and Handbook ? Will be they included in HTML format ? Yes, that's been fixed for awhile (see one of the SNAPs). Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:32:11 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Kline Subject: Re: Request for next release According to Robert Withrow: > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > CD's are used for? > > I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the > good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding > (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. But when the > 2.2.5 release came out I did't have a clue about what to do with > my 4 CD riches... > > ;-) > I'll second this. I installed 2.1.5 to my new 6x86 box no problem. Except for X. With my new 2.2.5 (very stable) after perhaps 6 hours and as many retries, zip. X fails. I can't find the VGA-16 driver. The release fails to boot in any fashion, although this may be a BIOS config problem. Debian was almost pushbutton on my 0th and 2nd SCSI; so X does work with my Matrox vcard. This is my 3rd CD set. Should be the simplest, but isn't. If there are any FBSD gurus in the Seattle area willing to help out, I'll buy ya a beer. In fact an entire case! gary kline kline@tera.com kline@thought.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:01:24 +0000 (GMT) From: Scot Elliott Subject: Re: Request for next release On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Robert Withrow wrote: > I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the > good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding > (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. But when the > 2.2.5 release came out I did't have a clue about what to do with > my 4 CD riches... > True - the descriptions on the last CD sets weren't entirely accurate ;-) I only just discovered the 'missing' packages on the fourth CD. Is there really not enough room on any of the CDs for the whole packages collection? And what colour is the cutesy little daemon fellow going to be this time? - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scot Elliott (scot@poptart.org) | Work: +44 (0)1344 899401 PGP fingerprint: FCAE9ED3A234FEB59F8C7F9DDD112D | Home: +44 (0)181 8961019 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public key available by finger at: finger scot@poptart.org or at: http://www.poptart.org/pgpkey.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 13:48:25 -0500 (EST) From: lrios Subject: RAID Controllers Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand of controllers will it support?? If any would be appreciated.. ______ __ /___ / / / __ / /(@)__ / (@)__ / /__ lrios@ziplink.net / // / _ \/ / / _ \/ '_/ / //_/ .__/_/_/_//_/_/\_\ NASA TEAM / /__/_/___________________ `He who dies with the most toys win!` /___________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:04:00 -0500 (EST) From: Snob Art Genre Subject: -stable suitable for small-enterprise NFS server? I can't imagine that this would be the case . . . but are there any NFS issues I should know about before building a ~12-user -stable NFS box? Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:29:55 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie Subject: problem compiling stable yesterday..... i have been having some trouble compiling 2.2.5-stable on this machine for the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make buildworld" was run. so, instead of trying to figure out exactly what the problem was i just deleted everything in /usr/src and used cvsup to put it all back. then i did a "make world" and everything was going along just fine so i went to bed. this morning i checked and i saw that the machine rebooted itself. the machine is running stable from around jan.29th and it has always compiled stable without any problems and i have never had any problems with it. does anybody have any ideas or do i need to RTFM? thanks....... > t found at 0x360 > pid 20789 (make), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0xefc004b8 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xf017484b > stack pointer = 0x10:0xefbfff14 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xefbfff24 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 14017 (as) > interrupt mask = net tty bio > panic: page fault > > syncing disks... 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 giving up > Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort > Rebooting... > Copyright (c) 1992-1998 FreeBSD Inc. > Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE #0: Sat Jan 31 08:44:48 EST 1998 > root@zero.myhouse.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/ZERO > CPU: i486DX (486-class CPU) > real memory = 33554432 (32768K bytes) > avail memory = 30826496 (30104K bytes) > Probing for devices on the ISA bus: > sc0 at 0x60-0x6f irq 1 on motherboard > sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> > sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on isa > sio0: type 16450 > sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa > sio1: type 16450 > lpt0 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > lp0: TCP/IP capable interface > fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa > fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in > wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa > wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): > wd0: 2014MB (4124736 sectors), 4092 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S > 1 3C5x9 board(s) on ISA found at 0x300 > ep0 at 0x300-0x30f irq 10 on isa > ep0: aui/utp[*UTP*] address 00:a0:24:04:17:c9 > npx0 flags 0x1 on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:33:27 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make Your hardware is bad. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:09:47 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Subject: Re: RAID Controllers On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, lrios wrote: > Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand > of controllers will it support?? > If any would be appreciated.. - Any kind of SCSI-SCSI RAID box - DPT (you need to install driver yourself from ftp.simon-shapiro.org) Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:37:01 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... ok, i'll look into that. i was wondering about that as i composed the message.....thanks.... BTW, somebody had mentioned a signal 11 FAQ a couple of months ago on this list and i looked around but didn't find it. does anybody know where it is located? On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > > > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make > > Your hardware is bad. > > Tom > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:16:34 -0600 From: Paul Saab Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ71.html#71 Paul zoonie (zoonie@myhouse.com) wrote: > ok, i'll look into that. i was wondering about that as i composed the > message.....thanks.... > > BTW, somebody had mentioned a signal 11 FAQ a couple of months ago on this > list and i looked around but didn't find it. does anybody know where it > is located? > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > > > > > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make > > > > Your hardware is bad. > > > > Tom > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:37:15 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... thanks for the pointer, i should probably look at the freebsd FAQ more often and instead of the handbook now i know where the signal 11 FAQ is.... thanks again to everybody else that responded also.... On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Paul Saab wrote: > > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ71.html#71 > > Paul > > zoonie (zoonie@myhouse.com) wrote: > > ok, i'll look into that. i was wondering about that as i composed the > > message.....thanks.... > > > > BTW, somebody had mentioned a signal 11 FAQ a couple of months ago on this > > list and i looked around but didn't find it. does anybody know where it > > is located? > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > > > > > > > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make > > > > > > Your hardware is bad. > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:55:27 -0500 From: Max Euston Subject: RE: is xntpd working in -STABLE? [ David: Sorry for the blank reply, my mouse got hyper for a moment :-) ] David, Funny, I just started working on this yesterday. I don't have a complete answer for you, but here are some data points: 1) Yes, xntpd DOES run on -stable (cvsup'ed and "make buildworld installworld" within about the last week). 2) I had the same symptom - the '-d' did no good either. 3) With all the variables I was trying, I'm not sure exactly how I got it working. 4) I had to make sure to open my firewall (I was also setting up ipfw for the first time) for udp port 123 (I know this is obvious, but it may or may not be the cause for the lack of output even w/ '-d'). 5) I used 'ntpdate -d' to get some more information when it was failing (and am running it now at bootup). 6) My drift file is empty, but I manually created /etc/ntp.{conf|drift|keys}. (I am still working on this). 7) From /etc/rc.conf: ntpdate_enable="YES" # Run the ntpdate to sync time (or NO). ntpdate_flags="-bs ntp.ctr.columbia.edu" # Flags to ntpdate (if enabled). xntpd_enable="YES" # Run xntpd Network Time Protocol (or NO). xntpd_flags="" # Flags to xntpd (if enabled). 8) From /etc/ntp.conf (minimal): server ntp.ctr.columbia.edu peer ns1 I didn't get to read my mail early today, so you may have already got this working. If not, let me know if I can give any further information. Max - ----- Max Euston Sysadm, Programmer, etc... On Wednesday, March 04, 1998 5:26 PM, David O'Brien [SMTP:obrien@NUXI.com] wrote: > I've got no problems with xntpd on a 2.2.5-R box with -CURRENT kernel > from last week. > > BUT, on my two machines I've done a `make world' on it doesn't. > I can't get it to create a `/var/run/ntp.drift' file. I've taken the > /etc/ntp.conf file from the 2.2.5-R box and put it on the other two. No > help. Tried ``xntpd -d'' to get some debuging output. It just exits. > No explaintion, no output to the screen at all. /var/log/messages says: > > Mar 4 14:24:50 kongur xntpd[2261]: xntpd version=3.4e (beta multicast); > Sat Oct 4 12:04:05 GMT 1997 (1) > Mar 4 14:24:50 kongur xntpd[2261]: tickadj = 5, tick = 10000, > tvu_maxslew = 495 > > but xntpd wont deamonize. > > -- > -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:14:59 -0500 From: "Lawrence Katz" Subject: [none] subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 10:38:34 +1100 From: John Saunders Subject: Re: Request for next release Robert Withrow wrote: > I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the > good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding > (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. Err, exactly what _is_ the live filesystem used for? I guess it could be mounted to give all the binaries if I ever have to boot from a rescue disk. But I've been lucky so far. What exactly do you use the unpacked source distribution for? I tried using the union filesystem to mount it so I could build directly off the CD. But union is broken so I ended up having to copy the source onto a harddisk anyway. Same with the CVS repository, you can't use it on the CD and have to copy to harddisk. Also it seems faster to extract the compressed tar files from the CD than to copy the unpacked version. So I never got the point of wasting all those CDs. :) Cheers. - -- +------------------------------------------------------------+ . | John Saunders mailto:John.Saunders@scitec.com.au (Work) | ,--_|\ | mailto:john@nlc.net.au (Home) | / Oz \ | http://www.nlc.net.au/~john/ | \_,--\_/ | SCITEC LIMITED Phone +61 2 9428 9563 Fax +61 2 9428 9933 | v | "By the time you make ends meet, they move the ends." | +------------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:47:05 +0100 From: Stefan Esser Subject: PCI LKM support: Need test results under 2.2.5 [se@FreeBSD.ORG: Re: PCI LKM's?] *********************************************************** I'd ***really*** love to see PCI LKM support make it into 2.2.6, but there is a problem, and I need help from users of FreeBSD-2.2.x. If you are intererested in this feature, then please build a patched kernel, and let me know what you find! *********************************************************** I had sent the message below to Danil O'Conner a few weeks ago, and he reported a problem with the *first* PCI device not being attached by a kernel compiled with this patch. The LKM code itself worked at a time (nearly one year ago), but there might be some unexpected side effect of the diffs. Since I do not have a 2.2.5 system to test this on myself (and since I'm short fo spare time), I'd appreciate more feedback about this set of patches. I did not touch the interrupt registration code, at least not knowingly :) Please let me know, whether a kernel compiled with this patch attaches all PCI devices. It will either work, or fail when probing for devices (best if you try booting with -s and just check for diagnostics at the start of the PCI probes). - --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mutthy1553 On 1998-02-17 10:50 +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > I added PCI LKM support to the PCI code more than one year > > ago, but never put it into the "official" 2.2.x repository. > > If you want patches, I can provide you with them, but if > > there is sufficient interest, I can also commit that code > > to -stable. > I would like that very much :) Ok, since you offered to test the code, I've appended the diffs to /sys/pci/{pci.c,pcibus.h,pci_ioctl.h} and to /usr/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.{c,8} as separate attachments. Please apply and test them ... (As I explained before, I don't have any 2.2.x system to test them on. I compiled pci.c with those patches, and found that one chunk had gone to the wrong lines, causing a syntax error. This is fixed in the patches I'm sending, but I'm a little worried, that it might have happened in other less obvious places as well ...) > > The interface is very simple: > > > > int pci_register_lkm (struct pci_device *dvp, int if_revision) > What about unloading LKM's? Perhaps pci_unregister_lkm, which unlinks it from > the list and removes the lkm..? Well, unloading LKMs should be possible, and I could add support for that, but I didn't at the time, since I felt that the rest of the kernel wasn't yet up to it. AFAIK, there is no locking in place currently, which would prevent unloading a busy driver. If you have support for a shutdown function in your driver, then I could call that, and thereafter remove the driver from the list of known PCI devices in order to prepare the unload. > > I added a support function to pciconf (or rather the underlying > > ioctl()), which reported whether a driver had been attached to > > a device. This allowed the loading of PCI LKMs from a script > > called from /etc/rc, controlled by the PCI vendor and device > > IDs. > Thats neat, and IMHO is a good idea for making the system more flexible (ie > requiring less reboots :) Only, if unloading of PCI LKMs is supported, I'm afraid. If you need it, I can see what I can do within a few days, though I'm very busy and can't promise anything, currently. Regards, STefan - --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="PCICONF-LKM.patch" Index: pciconf.c =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1.2.3 diff -u -2 -r1.1.1.1.2.3 pciconf.c - --- pciconf.c 1997/10/08 07:36:44 1.1.1.1.2.3 +++ pciconf.c 1998/02/17 21:22:55 @@ -50,13 +50,16 @@ static void readit(const char *, const char *, int); static void writeit(const char *, const char *, const char *, int); +static void chkattached(const char *, int); +static exitstatus = 0; static void usage() { - - fprintf(stderr, "%s\n%s\n%s\n", - - "usage: pciconf -l", - - " pciconf -r [-b | -h] sel addr", - - " pciconf -w [-b | -h] sel addr [value]"); + fprintf(stderr, "%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n", + "usage: pciconf -l", + " pciconf -a sel", + " pciconf -r [-b | -h] sel addr", + " pciconf -w [-b | -h] sel addr [value]"); exit (1); } @@ -66,11 +69,15 @@ { int c; - - int listmode, readmode, writemode; + int listmode, readmode, writemode, attachedmode; int byte, isshort; - - listmode = readmode = writemode = byte = isshort = 0; + listmode = readmode = writemode = attachedmode = byte = isshort = 0; - - while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "lrwbh")) != -1) { + while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "alrwbh")) != -1) { switch(c) { + case 'a': + attachedmode = 1; + break; + case 'l': listmode = 1; @@ -100,9 +107,13 @@ if ((listmode && optind != argc) || (writemode && optind + 3 != argc) - - || (readmode && optind + 2 != argc)) + || (readmode && optind + 2 != argc) + || (attachedmode && optind + 1 != argc)) usage(); if (listmode) { list_devs(); + } else if(attachedmode) { + chkattached(argv[optind], + byte ? 1 : isshort ? 2 : 4); } else if(readmode) { readit(argv[optind], argv[optind + 1], @@ -115,5 +126,5 @@ } - - return 0; + return exitstatus; } @@ -208,3 +219,25 @@ if (ioctl(fd, PCIOCWRITE, &pi) < 0) err(1, "ioctl(PCIOCWRITE)"); +} + +static void +chkattached (const char *name, int width) +{ + int fd; + struct pci_io pi; + + pi.pi_sel = getsel(name); + pi.pi_reg = 0; + pi.pi_width = width; + pi.pi_data = 0; + + fd = open(_PATH_DEVPCI, O_RDWR, 0); + if (fd < 0) + err(1, "%s", _PATH_DEVPCI); + + if (ioctl(fd, PCIOCATTACHED, &pi) < 0) + err(1, "ioctl(PCIOCATTACHED)"); + + exitstatus = pi.pi_data ? 0 : 2; /* exit(2), if NOT attached */ + printf("%s: %s%s\n", name, pi.pi_data == 0 ? "not " : "", "attached"); } Index: pciconf.8 =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.8,v retrieving revision 1.3.2.1 diff -u -2 -r1.3.2.1 pciconf.8 - --- pciconf.8 1997/10/08 10:33:10 1.3.2.1 +++ pciconf.8 1998/02/17 21:28:24 @@ -33,4 +33,5 @@ .Sh SYNOPSIS .Nm pciconf Fl l +.Nm pciconf Fl a Ar selector .Nm pciconf Fl r Ar selector .Op Fl b | Fl h @@ -105,4 +106,14 @@ .Fl l can be used without modification. All numbers are base 10. +.Pp +With the +.Fl a +flag, +.Nm +determines whether any driver has been assigned to the device +identified by +.Ar selector . +An exit status of zero indicates that the device has a driver; +non-zero indicates that it does not. .Pp The - --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=loadlkm #!/bin/sh # # Put this script into a new directory /etc/pci under the name "loadlkm" and # make /etc/rc call it early (may have to load network interface drivers) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 5 23:27:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA28287 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 23:27:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from weald.air.saab.se (weald.air.saab.se [136.163.212.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA28208 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 23:26:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gunnar.isaksson@saab.se) Received: from limes (localhost.air.saab.se [127.0.0.1]) by weald.air.saab.se (MSTR SLVE/XXVI) with SMTP id XVIAA10825 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 08:25:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <34FFA501.3625@saab.se> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 08:25:53 +0100 From: Gunnar Isaksson Organization: SAAB MA X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.05 9000/735) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: subscribe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk subscribe freebsd-stable -- ========================================================== Gunnar Isaksson Hamradio: SM5IUF Internet: Gunnar.Isaksson@saab.se Running Debian/GNU Linux and FreeBSD the really free OS:es Take a peek at http://www.debian.org __________________________________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 00:14:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA11352 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:14:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA11345 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:14:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA25503; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:10:16 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803060810.AAA25503@implode.root.com> To: Chris Timmons cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Mar 1998 22:46:17 PST." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 00:10:16 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >I sent David Greenman some info about a fatal trap 12 - page fault in >kernel mode panic I'm getting with this morning's -stable kernel. > >it stops cvsup to my ccd /home cold in about the same place every time. > >#10 0xf01304d7 in getnewbuf (slpflag=0, slptimeo=0, size=3072, >maxsize=8192) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:957#10 0xf01304d7 in getnewbuf >(slpflag=0, slptimeo=0, size=3072, maxsize=8192) at >../../kern/vfs_bio.c:957 Yes, this is disturbing. I don't understand how the fix I brought in could cause that panic (being in a different part of the code and ineffective for all filesystems except NFS client), but stranger things have happened. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 02:34:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA29223 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 02:34:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from solaric.UkrCard.Kiev.UA (ukrcard-gu.gu.net [194.93.170.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA29216 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 02:34:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alex@UkrCard.COM) Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by solaric.UkrCard.Kiev.UA (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA20940; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 12:34:01 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from alex@solaric.UkrCard.Kiev.UA) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 12:33:59 +0200 (EET) From: Alexander Tatmaniants To: Tom cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RAID Controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, lrios wrote: > > > Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand > > of controllers will it support?? > > If any would be appreciated.. > > - Any kind of SCSI-SCSI RAID box Can you provide me an example of boards and manufacturers? > > - DPT (you need to install driver yourself from ftp.simon-shapiro.org) > > > Tom > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 03:19:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA03491 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 03:19:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from securitas.net (root@max.securitas.net [194.121.52.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA03480 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 03:19:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ksellman@securitas.net) Received: from hermia.securitas.net (ksellman@hermia.securitas.net [194.121.52.19]) by securitas.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA17950; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 12:19:35 +0100 (MET) Received: (from ksellman@localhost) by hermia.securitas.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) id MAA05374; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 12:19:35 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19980306121935.61763@securitas.net> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 12:19:35 +0100 From: Martin Ksellmann To: Alexander Tatmaniants Cc: Tom , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RAID Controllers References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85 In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Alexander Tatmaniants hat am 06.03.98 um 12:33 folgendes geschrieben: > > > Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand > > > of controllers will it support?? > > > If any would be appreciated.. > > > > - Any kind of SCSI-SCSI RAID box > Can you provide me an example of boards and manufacturers? Adaptec is known to build some and we are using a Proware 5000SW (http://www.proware.com.tw). Adaptec didn't want to sell me one of theirs, because they said, they only sell it computer manufacturers. Mainly these RAIDs are small PCs build into a 5,25 inch (half height) case, that can be integrated into a normal PC case. Our 5000SW is a 80486/33 MHz including 16 MB Ram and has 2 UW-RAID Controllers for linking harddisks to it and 2 UW-SCSI ports for accessing computers. Yours, Martin Ksellmann -- Es gibt nichts mächtigeres ! Securitas Internet Systems GmbH als eine Idee, ! Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München deren Zeit gekommen ist. ! Phone: +49.89.2199.770 Fax: +49.89.2199.7722 (Victor Hugo) ! e-mail: mk@securitas.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 04:07:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA08223 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from beach.utmb.edu (beach.utmb.edu [129.109.212.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA08216 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 04:07:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from POSTMASTER@MSPO2.MED.UTMB.EDU) From: POSTMASTER@MSPO2.MED.UTMB.EDU Received: from GALV8TH.utmb.edu by BEACH.UTMB.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #18539) with SMTP id <01IUC3IAAB280004D3@BEACH.UTMB.EDU> for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 06:03:58 CDT Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 01:01:00 -0600 Subject: Mail failure To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <01IUC3IACH0Y0004D3@BEACH.UTMB.EDU> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Worldtalk (NetConnex V4.00a)/MIME Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id EAA08218 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk FROM: UTMB/MSPO2/POSTMASTER TO: stable@FreeBSD.ORG DATE: 03-06-98 TIME: 01:02 SUBJECT: Mail failure ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [002] Mail was received that was addressed to unknown addresses. Mail item was not delivered to: UTMB/MSPO2/ehymel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ stable-digest Thursday, March 5 1998 Volume 04 : Number 026 In this issue: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA problems with de driver for quad card Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: problems with de driver for quad card Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Re: 'make world': /bin/sh not found Compile failure on gctags Request for next release Re: Compile failure on gctags Re: Request for next release Re: Compile failure on gctags Re: Request for next release Re: Compile failure on gctags Re: Request for next release Re: Request for next release Re: Request for next release Re: Request for next release RAID Controllers -stable suitable for small-enterprise NFS server? problem compiling stable yesterday..... Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... Re: RAID Controllers Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... RE: is xntpd working in -STABLE? [none] Re: Request for next release PCI LKM support: Need test results under 2.2.5 [se@FreeBSD.ORG: Re: PCI LKM's?] Re: Request for next release UUCP request for next release Re: UUCP request for next release Re: UUCP request for next release Re: mgetty and iij-ppp Re: mgetty and iij-ppp bind Re: bind Re: bmake panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 21:22:48 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA .. will be Monday, March 9th. That means all general merge work and general sysinstall hackery must be done by 1:00PM PST on that day so that we may enter the BETA test cycle and start regression testing. Daily snapshots of the BETA bits will be made available as usual in ftp://releng22.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD. The BETA period for 2.2.6 will end on the 24th of March at 1:00AM PST, e.g. just a little after the 23rd of March has ended. :) I will be tagging the tree in preparation for 2.2.6 release at that time. Actually meeting a planned-in-advance deadline would also be a new thing around here and I'm going to do my darndest to see that it happens for once. :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 22:21:36 -0800 From: Studded Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > ... will be Monday, March 9th. So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) Doug - -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 15:47:52 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA >> ... will be Monday, March 9th. > > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to >the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or >perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:20:47 -0800 From: Studded Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: > > >> ... will be Monday, March 9th. > > > > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to > >the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or > >perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) > > I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts before you state your opinions. Check out http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. Doug - -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 02:38:03 -0500 From: "Prashant R. Chandra" Subject: problems with de driver for quad card Hi! All, Please forgive me if this question has been asked before on the mailing list. I want to report a problem we are facing with the driver for the Zynx ZX346 Quad PCI ethernet card. When two of these cards are connected back-to-back (in two Pentium II PCs) the configuration seems to go haywire. The cards come up complaining that autosense failed and if I use ifconfig to set the media type to 100baseTX on both ends, I get connectivity but I have problem with bidirectional traffic. Ping seems to work fine, but doing a TCP bandwidth test using ttcp fails because packets are being dropped on the point-to-point link between the two cards. (Fails means the TCP bandwidth is only about 0.8 Mbps or so). Another problem is that I cannot get the link to operate at 10 Mbps. If I set the media to 10baseT/UTP, the interface reports that it has 'no carrier'. I have repeated the exact same tests with Windows NT 4.0 and everything seems to be fine (TCP bandwidth of 93 Mbps). Everything is also fine when one end of the link is a Dec Alpha workstation with a 100 Mbps ethernet interface (not the same quad board). The problem only happens when two quad cards are connected back to back in FreeBSD PCs. The problem seems to be due to misconfiguration of full-duplex/half-duplex operation. The list of supported media types for the de driver does not include 100baseTX and 10baseT/UTP . What is the reason? (the hardware supports full-duplex operation) The version of FreeBSD we are using is FreeBSD 2.2.5. We also see this problem with NetBSD 1.3. It is not suprising since the driver is the same. I had posted this message on the NetBSD mailing list a month ago and got no reply. Hopefully I will have better luck this time :-). If anyone out there has tried the quad cards in a back-to-configuration (using a null-cable) and has encountered similar problems please let me know. Any suggestions on how to tackle this will be greatly appreciated. Please reply directly to prashant@cs.cmu.edu. Thank you. -prashant PS: The exact ifconfig command we use to bring up the interfaces as 100Mbps is: ifconfig de0 192.200.51.1 255.255.255.0 192.200.51.255 media 100baseTX up - -- ____________________________________________________ R. Prashant Chandra e-mail: prashant@cs.cmu.edu Web: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~prashant Phone: 412-268-2580 (Office) 412-268-7560 (Lab) 412-681-3829 (Home) ____________________________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:40:54 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to > the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or > perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) I don't know the answer to this yet. We'll have to see. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 23:48:58 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA > > I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. > > Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things > you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts > before you state your opinions. Check out > http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. I agree, uninformed guessing can be a bad thing. What guess lies behind your claim that XFree86 3.3.2 will be based on X11R6.4? Just because it's available internally to consortium members is by no means a declaration that the XFree86 project intends to track it in their upcoming point release of 3.3.2 and, in fact, I'd say that it'd be a very bad guess indeed to assume such a thing. :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:10:09 -0800 From: Michael Oski Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R63. > > > > Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things > > you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts > > before you state your opinions. Check out > > http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. > > I agree, uninformed guessing can be a bad thing. What guess lies > behind your claim that XFree86 3.3.2 will be based on X11R6.4? Just > because it's available internally to consortium members is by no means > a declaration that the XFree86 project intends to track it in their > upcoming point release of 3.3.2 and, in fact, I'd say that it'd be a > very bad guess indeed to assume such a thing. :-) > > Jordan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message Ah, the joy of rash assumptions.... FYI - XFree86 v3.3.2 is still based on X11R6.3, you can verify by checking the release notes included in the .tgz's. Also, www.XFree86.org claims they have no scheduled release date for version 4.0. Now here's my assumption: this is most likely the first based on X11R6.4 ;-) Michael! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 17:20:31 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA >> > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to ~~~~~~~ >> >the ftp site they're planning wide release by the end of march. Or >> >perhaps we're part of the inner circle they mention? :) >> >> I believe the next XFree86 release will still be based on X11R6.3. > > Nothing personal because I don't know you, but one of the worst things >you can do on a technical list is guess. Please confirm your facts >before you state your opinions. Check out >http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/. Nothing personal, but aren't you rather confusing the Open Group and the XFree86 Project Inc? XFree86 is primarily developed and distributed by the XFree86 Project Inc. The code is, of course, derived from that of the Open Group. But, it does not necessarily mean that the latest release from the XFree86 always matches the latest release of X11. In fact http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/x/r6.4doc/relnotes/relnotes.htm mentions XFree86 3.3.1 which was released in Aug. 97 and is based on X11R6.3pl2. You had better check out the XFree86 web site: http://www.xfree86.org/ rather than the Open Group's, for the latest information and status of XFree86. Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:30:21 +0100 (CET) From: Andre Albsmeier Subject: Re: problems with de driver for quad card > Hi! All, > Please forgive me if this question has been asked before on the > mailing > list. I want to report a problem we are facing with the driver for the > Zynx ZX346 Quad PCI ethernet card. When two of these cards are > connected > back-to-back (in two Pentium II PCs) the configuration seems to go > haywire. > The cards come up complaining that autosense failed and if I use > ifconfig > to set the media type to 100baseTX on both ends, I get connectivity but > I have problem with bidirectional traffic. Ping seems to work fine, but > doing a TCP bandwidth test using ttcp fails because packets are being > dropped on the point-to-point link between the two cards. (Fails means > the TCP bandwidth is only about 0.8 Mbps or so). Another problem is > that > I cannot get the link to operate at 10 Mbps. If I set the media to > 10baseT/UTP, > the interface reports that it has 'no carrier'. The de driver is broken regarding the media selection. (PR 4841). I had some email exchange with Matt Thomas concerning this but haven't heard from him for approx. 2 month. I gave it up now and will keep on using the old version 1.54.2.6 which works for my SMC 8434BT. -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:57:57 -0800 From: Studded Subject: Re: When: 2.2.5-stable branch freeze and beginning of 2.2.6-BETA Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: > > >> > So I take it we're not going to wait for XFree86 R6.4? According to > ~~~~~~~ Please don't assume I don't know what I mean. I asked the question I wanted to ask. What I should have made more clear is that the open group's ftp site was the one I was referring to. > Nothing personal, but aren't you rather confusing the Open Group and > the XFree86 Project Inc? Nope, sorry I wasn't more clear. > XFree86 is primarily developed and distributed by the XFree86 Project > Inc. The code is, of course, derived from that of the Open Group. > But, it does not necessarily mean that the latest release from the > XFree86 always matches the latest release of X11. > You had better check out the XFree86 web site: > http://www.xfree86.org/ > rather than the Open Group's, for the latest information and status > of XFree86. I did, and there was no mention of anything beyond 3.3.1. Anyway, I've spent all day arguing with a pita solaris machine, and I am too tired to really give a rip. My apologies for any offense. Doug - -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:01:44 +0000 From: nik@iii.co.uk Subject: Re: 'make world': /bin/sh not found On Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 01:49:36AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > This is an odd one. I'm trying to update my 2.2.5-stable system to the > > latest -stable. My last successful 'make world' was on Jan 31 this > > year. > > Just a suggestion: cp /usr/src/share/mk/* /usr/share/mk > I suspect that your bsd.info.mk file may be spooged. No joy. Something I neglected to mention was that I can go into the appropriate directory and run the 'make clean' by hand it works with no problems. It looks as though I'm hitting some sort of resource limit, but I can't find where. Very odd. N - -- Work: nik@iii.co.uk | FreeBSD + Perl + Apache Rest: nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk | Remind me again why we need Play: nik@freebsd.org | Microsoft? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: 05 Mar 1998 13:10:31 +0100 From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Subject: Compile failure on gctags In yesterday's STABLE (fetched from ftp.de.freebsd.org), the build fails like this: /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c: In function `c_entries': /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: `rflag' undeclared (first use this function) /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: for each function it appears in.) I think that one occurrence of rtag needs to be protected by an #ifdef GTAGS - -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 08:35:50 -0500 From: Robert Withrow Subject: Request for next release If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the CD's are used for? I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. But when the 2.2.5 release came out I did't have a clue about what to do with my 4 CD riches... ;-) - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA, witr@rwwa.COM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 05:36:03 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons Subject: Re: Compile failure on gctags What, without even my mangling hands stirring things up? I'll take a look momentarily. - -Chris On 5 Mar 1998, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote: > > In yesterday's STABLE (fetched from ftp.de.freebsd.org), the build > fails like this: > > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c: In function `c_entries': > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: `rflag' undeclared (first use this function) > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: for each function it appears in) > > I think that one occurrence of rtag needs to be protected by an > > #ifdef GTAGS > > -- > Cheers =8-} Mike > Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 05:45:53 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: Request for next release > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > CD's are used for? Yes, that's already planned along with updated installation instructions. The next booklet will be a total rewrite, essentially. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 06:20:54 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons Subject: Re: Compile failure on gctags Michael, I didn't see it at first, but now I do: global is contribified in -stable, so there shouldn't be ANY program source files under src/usr.bin/global. I just built it here without any problem. The question is, what's up with your sources? I'm not sure how you are updating your sources, but you should use CVSup. See the FreeBSD Handbook at http://www.freebsd.org for instructions on how to do that. If you are ftp'ing the CVS repository, that is a sure way to run amok - retrieve that with CVSup as well. If you are updating your tree with CVS, you must say 'cvs update -Pd -rRELENG_2_2' in /usr/src. Regards, - -Chris On 5 Mar 1998, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] wrote: > > In yesterday's STABLE (fetched from ftp.de.freebsd.org), the build > fails like this: > > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c: In function `c_entries': > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: `rflag' undeclared (first use this function) > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > /usr/src/usr.bin/global/gctags/C.c:280: for each function it appears in) > > I think that one occurrence of rtag needs to be protected by an > > #ifdef GTAGS > > -- > Cheers =8-} Mike > Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:20:26 +0300 From: "Igor Sysoev" Subject: Re: Request for next release > > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > > CD's are used for? > > Yes, that's already planned along with updated installation > instructions. The next booklet will be a total rewrite, essentially. What' s about FAQ and Handbook ? Will be they included in HTML format ? with best regards, Igor Sysoev To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: 05 Mar 1998 17:03:00 +0100 From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Subject: Re: Compile failure on gctags >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Timmons writes: Chris> Michael, Chris> I didn't see it at first, but now I do: global is contribified Chris> in -stable, I'm new to -STABLE, so I don't know what that means or how to fix it. Chris> so there shouldn't be ANY program source files under Chris> src/usr.bin/global. Can I just rm -rf that directory? Chris> I just built it here without any problem. The question is, what's up with Chris> your sources? Nothing. I pulled src.tar off /ftp.de.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-stable as per the Handbook instructions. Anything wrong with that? Chris> I'm not sure how you are updating your sources, but you should Chris> use CVSup. I can't because there's a networking bug in FreeBSD 2.2.5 that makes network writes fail (duly reported). That's actually the *reason* I want to compile stable at all---I have a faint hope it's fixed there. Catch-22 dadadadadaaaaaaaaaaaa - -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:46:38 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund Subject: Re: Request for next release On Thu, Mar 05, 1998 at 05:20:26PM +0300, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > > > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > > > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > > > CD's are used for? > > > > Yes, that's already planned along with updated installation > > instructions. The next booklet will be a total rewrite, essentially. > > What' s about FAQ and Handbook ? Will be they included in HTML format ? I'm fairly certain the FAQ and handbook are automatically built for the distribution now. There was a flurry of commits (by Jordan) some time back to make this possible. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 09:19:33 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: Request for next release > What' s about FAQ and Handbook ? Will be they included in HTML format ? Yes, that's been fixed for awhile (see one of the SNAPs). Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:32:11 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Kline Subject: Re: Request for next release According to Robert Withrow: > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > CD's are used for? > > I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the > good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding > (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. But when the > 2.2.5 release came out I did't have a clue about what to do with > my 4 CD riches... > > ;-) > I'll second this. I installed 2.1.5 to my new 6x86 box no problem. Except for X. With my new 2.2.5 (very stable) after perhaps 6 hours and as many retries, zip. X fails. I can't find the VGA-16 driver. The release fails to boot in any fashion, although this may be a BIOS config problem. Debian was almost pushbutton on my 0th and 2nd SCSI; so X does work with my Matrox vcard. This is my 3rd CD set. Should be the simplest, but isn't. If there are any FBSD gurus in the Seattle area willing to help out, I'll buy ya a beer. In fact an entire case! gary kline kline@tera.com kline@thought.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 18:01:24 +0000 (GMT) From: Scot Elliott Subject: Re: Request for next release On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Robert Withrow wrote: > I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the > good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding > (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. But when the > 2.2.5 release came out I did't have a clue about what to do with > my 4 CD riches... > True - the descriptions on the last CD sets weren't entirely accurate ;-) I only just discovered the 'missing' packages on the fourth CD. Is there really not enough room on any of the CDs for the whole packages collection? And what colour is the cutesy little daemon fellow going to be this time? - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scot Elliott (scot@poptart.org) | Work: +44 (0)1344 899401 PGP fingerprint: FCAE9ED3A234FEB59F8C7F9DDD112D | Home: +44 (0)181 8961019 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public key available by finger at: finger scot@poptart.org or at: http://www.poptart.org/pgpkey.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 13:48:25 -0500 (EST) From: lrios Subject: RAID Controllers Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand of controllers will it support?? If any would be appreciated.. ______ __ /___ / / / __ / /(@)__ / (@)__ / /__ lrios@ziplink.net / // / _ \/ / / _ \/ '_/ / //_/ .__/_/_/_//_/_/\_\ NASA TEAM / /__/_/___________________ `He who dies with the most toys win!` /___________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:04:00 -0500 (EST) From: Snob Art Genre Subject: -stable suitable for small-enterprise NFS server? I can't imagine that this would be the case . . . but are there any NFS issues I should know about before building a ~12-user -stable NFS box? Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:29:55 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie Subject: problem compiling stable yesterday..... i have been having some trouble compiling 2.2.5-stable on this machine for the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make buildworld" was run. so, instead of trying to figure out exactly what the problem was i just deleted everything in /usr/src and used cvsup to put it all back. then i did a "make world" and everything was going along just fine so i went to bed. this morning i checked and i saw that the machine rebooted itself. the machine is running stable from around jan.29th and it has always compiled stable without any problems and i have never had any problems with it. does anybody have any ideas or do i need to RTFM? thanks....... > t found at 0x360 > pid 20789 (make), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0xefc004b8 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xf017484b > stack pointer = 0x10:0xefbfff14 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xefbfff24 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 14017 (as) > interrupt mask = net tty bio > panic: page fault > > syncing disks... 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 giving up > Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort > Rebooting... > Copyright (c) 1992-1998 FreeBSD Inc. > Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE #0: Sat Jan 31 08:44:48 EST 1998 > root@zero.myhouse.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/ZERO > CPU: i486DX (486-class CPU) > real memory = 33554432 (32768K bytes) > avail memory = 30826496 (30104K bytes) > Probing for devices on the ISA bus: > sc0 at 0x60-0x6f irq 1 on motherboard > sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> > sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on isa > sio0: type 16450 > sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa > sio1: type 16450 > lpt0 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > lp0: TCP/IP capable interface > fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa > fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in > wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa > wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): > wd0: 2014MB (4124736 sectors), 4092 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S > 1 3C5x9 board(s) on ISA found at 0x300 > ep0 at 0x300-0x30f irq 10 on isa > ep0: aui/utp[*UTP*] address 00:a0:24:04:17:c9 > npx0 flags 0x1 on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:33:27 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make Your hardware is bad. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 11:09:47 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Subject: Re: RAID Controllers On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, lrios wrote: > Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand > of controllers will it support?? > If any would be appreciated.. - Any kind of SCSI-SCSI RAID box - DPT (you need to install driver yourself from ftp.simon-shapiro.org) Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:37:01 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... ok, i'll look into that. i was wondering about that as i composed the message.....thanks.... BTW, somebody had mentioned a signal 11 FAQ a couple of months ago on this list and i looked around but didn't find it. does anybody know where it is located? On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > > > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make > > Your hardware is bad. > > Tom > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:16:34 -0600 From: Paul Saab Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ71.html#71 Paul zoonie (zoonie@myhouse.com) wrote: > ok, i'll look into that. i was wondering about that as i composed the > message.....thanks.... > > BTW, somebody had mentioned a signal 11 FAQ a couple of months ago on this > list and i looked around but didn't find it. does anybody know where it > is located? > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > > > > > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make > > > > Your hardware is bad. > > > > Tom > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:37:15 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie Subject: Re: problem compiling stable yesterday..... thanks for the pointer, i should probably look at the freebsd FAQ more often and instead of the handbook now i know where the signal 11 FAQ is.... thanks again to everybody else that responded also.... On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Paul Saab wrote: > > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ71.html#71 > > Paul > > zoonie (zoonie@myhouse.com) wrote: > > ok, i'll look into that. i was wondering about that as i composed the > > message.....thanks.... > > > > BTW, somebody had mentioned a signal 11 FAQ a couple of months ago on this > > list and i looked around but didn't find it. does anybody know where it > > is located? > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, zoonie wrote: > > > > > > > the last couple of days. originally i was getting signal 11s when a "make > > > > > > Your hardware is bad. > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:55:27 -0500 From: Max Euston Subject: RE: is xntpd working in -STABLE? [ David: Sorry for the blank reply, my mouse got hyper for a moment :-) ] David, Funny, I just started working on this yesterday. I don't have a complete answer for you, but here are some data points: 1) Yes, xntpd DOES run on -stable (cvsup'ed and "make buildworld installworld" within about the last week). 2) I had the same symptom - the '-d' did no good either. 3) With all the variables I was trying, I'm not sure exactly how I got it working. 4) I had to make sure to open my firewall (I was also setting up ipfw for the first time) for udp port 123 (I know this is obvious, but it may or may not be the cause for the lack of output even w/ '-d'). 5) I used 'ntpdate -d' to get some more information when it was failing (and am running it now at bootup). 6) My drift file is empty, but I manually created /etc/ntp.{conf|drift|keys}. (I am still working on this). 7) From /etc/rc.conf: ntpdate_enable="YES" # Run the ntpdate to sync time (or NO). ntpdate_flags="-bs ntp.ctr.columbia.edu" # Flags to ntpdate (if enabled). xntpd_enable="YES" # Run xntpd Network Time Protocol (or NO). xntpd_flags="" # Flags to xntpd (if enabled). 8) From /etc/ntp.conf (minimal): server ntp.ctr.columbia.edu peer ns1 I didn't get to read my mail early today, so you may have already got this working. If not, let me know if I can give any further information. Max - ----- Max Euston Sysadm, Programmer, etc... On Wednesday, March 04, 1998 5:26 PM, David O'Brien [SMTP:obrien@NUXI.com] wrote: > I've got no problems with xntpd on a 2.2.5-R box with -CURRENT kernel > from last week. > > BUT, on my two machines I've done a `make world' on it doesn't. > I can't get it to create a `/var/run/ntp.drift' file. I've taken the > /etc/ntp.conf file from the 2.2.5-R box and put it on the other two. No > help. Tried ``xntpd -d'' to get some debuging output. It just exits. > No explaintion, no output to the screen at all. /var/log/messages says: > > Mar 4 14:24:50 kongur xntpd[2261]: xntpd version=3.4e (beta multicast); > Sat Oct 4 12:04:05 GMT 1997 (1) > Mar 4 14:24:50 kongur xntpd[2261]: tickadj = 5, tick = 10000, > tvu_maxslew = 495 > > but xntpd wont deamonize. > > -- > -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:14:59 -0500 From: "Lawrence Katz" Subject: [none] subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 10:38:34 +1100 From: John Saunders Subject: Re: Request for next release Robert Withrow wrote: > I mean, I got to understand the "live file system" CD back in the > good old 2 CD days. And I always enjoy the challenge of finding > (or not finding) the unpacked source distribution. Err, exactly what _is_ the live filesystem used for? I guess it could be mounted to give all the binaries if I ever have to boot from a rescue disk. But I've been lucky so far. What exactly do you use the unpacked source distribution for? I tried using the union filesystem to mount it so I could build directly off the CD. But union is broken so I ended up having to copy the source onto a harddisk anyway. Same with the CVS repository, you can't use it on the CD and have to copy to harddisk. Also it seems faster to extract the compressed tar files from the CD than to copy the unpacked version. So I never got the point of wasting all those CDs. :) Cheers. - -- +------------------------------------------------------------+ . | John Saunders mailto:John.Saunders@scitec.com.au (Work) | ,--_|\ | mailto:john@nlc.net.au (Home) | / Oz \ | http://www.nlc.net.au/~john/ | \_,--\_/ | SCITEC LIMITED Phone +61 2 9428 9563 Fax +61 2 9428 9933 | v | "By the time you make ends meet, they move the ends." | +------------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 00:47:05 +0100 From: Stefan Esser Subject: PCI LKM support: Need test results under 2.2.5 [se@FreeBSD.ORG: Re: PCI LKM's?] *********************************************************** I'd ***really*** love to see PCI LKM support make it into 2.2.6, but there is a problem, and I need help from users of FreeBSD-2.2.x. If you are intererested in this feature, then please build a patched kernel, and let me know what you find! *********************************************************** I had sent the message below to Danil O'Conner a few weeks ago, and he reported a problem with the *first* PCI device not being attached by a kernel compiled with this patch. The LKM code itself worked at a time (nearly one year ago), but there might be some unexpected side effect of the diffs. Since I do not have a 2.2.5 system to test this on myself (and since I'm short fo spare time), I'd appreciate more feedback about this set of patches. I did not touch the interrupt registration code, at least not knowingly :) Please let me know, whether a kernel compiled with this patch attaches all PCI devices. It will either work, or fail when probing for devices (best if you try booting with -s and just check for diagnostics at the start of the PCI probes). - --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mutthy1553 On 1998-02-17 10:50 +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > I added PCI LKM support to the PCI code more than one year > > ago, but never put it into the "official" 2.2.x repository. > > If you want patches, I can provide you with them, but if > > there is sufficient interest, I can also commit that code > > to -stable. > I would like that very much :) Ok, since you offered to test the code, I've appended the diffs to /sys/pci/{pci.c,pcibus.h,pci_ioctl.h} and to /usr/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.{c,8} as separate attachments. Please apply and test them ... (As I explained before, I don't have any 2.2.x system to test them on. I compiled pci.c with those patches, and found that one chunk had gone to the wrong lines, causing a syntax error. This is fixed in the patches I'm sending, but I'm a little worried, that it might have happened in other less obvious places as well ...) > > The interface is very simple: > > > > int pci_register_lkm (struct pci_device *dvp, int if_revision) > What about unloading LKM's? Perhaps pci_unregister_lkm, which unlinks it from > the list and removes the lkm..? Well, unloading LKMs should be possible, and I could add support for that, but I didn't at the time, since I felt that the rest of the kernel wasn't yet up to it. AFAIK, there is no locking in place currently, which would prevent unloading a busy driver. If you have support for a shutdown function in your driver, then I could call that, and thereafter remove the driver from the list of known PCI devices in order to prepare the unload. > > I added a support function to pciconf (or rather the underlying > > ioctl()), which reported whether a driver had been attached to > > a device. This allowed the loading of PCI LKMs from a script > > called from /etc/rc, controlled by the PCI vendor and device > > IDs. > Thats neat, and IMHO is a good idea for making the system more flexible (ie > requiring less reboots :) Only, if unloading of PCI LKMs is supported, I'm afraid. If you need it, I can see what I can do within a few days, though I'm very busy and can't promise anything, currently. Regards, STefan - --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="PCICONF-LKM.patch" Index: pciconf.c =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1.2.3 diff -u -2 -r1.1.1.1.2.3 pciconf.c - --- pciconf.c 1997/10/08 07:36:44 1.1.1.1.2.3 +++ pciconf.c 1998/02/17 21:22:55 @@ -50,13 +50,16 @@ static void readit(const char *, const char *, int); static void writeit(const char *, const char *, const char *, int); +static void chkattached(const char *, int); +static exitstatus = 0; static void usage() { - - fprintf(stderr, "%s\n%s\n%s\n", - - "usage: pciconf -l", - - " pciconf -r [-b | -h] sel addr", - - " pciconf -w [-b | -h] sel addr [value]"); + fprintf(stderr, "%s\n%s\n%s\n%s\n", + "usage: pciconf -l", + " pciconf -a sel", + " pciconf -r [-b | -h] sel addr", + " pciconf -w [-b | -h] sel addr [value]"); exit (1); } @@ -66,11 +69,15 @@ { int c; - - int listmode, readmode, writemode; + int listmode, readmode, writemode, attachedmode; int byte, isshort; - - listmode = readmode = writemode = byte = isshort = 0; + listmode = readmode = writemode = attachedmode = byte = isshort = 0; - - while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "lrwbh")) != -1) { + while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "alrwbh")) != -1) { switch(c) { + case 'a': + attachedmode = 1; + break; + case 'l': listmode = 1; @@ -100,9 +107,13 @@ if ((listmode && optind != argc) || (writemode && optind + 3 != argc) - - || (readmode && optind + 2 != argc)) + || (readmode && optind + 2 != argc) + || (attachedmode && optind + 1 != argc)) usage(); if (listmode) { list_devs(); + } else if(attachedmode) { + chkattached(argv[optind], + byte ? 1 : isshort ? 2 : 4); } else if(readmode) { readit(argv[optind], argv[optind + 1], @@ -115,5 +126,5 @@ } - - return 0; + return exitstatus; } @@ -208,3 +219,25 @@ if (ioctl(fd, PCIOCWRITE, &pi) < 0) err(1, "ioctl(PCIOCWRITE)"); +} + +static void +chkattached (const char *name, int width) +{ + int fd; + struct pci_io pi; + + pi.pi_sel = getsel(name); + pi.pi_reg = 0; + pi.pi_width = width; + pi.pi_data = 0; + + fd = open(_PATH_DEVPCI, O_RDWR, 0); + if (fd < 0) + err(1, "%s", _PATH_DEVPCI); + + if (ioctl(fd, PCIOCATTACHED, &pi) < 0) + err(1, "ioctl(PCIOCATTACHED)"); + + exitstatus = pi.pi_data ? 0 : 2; /* exit(2), if NOT attached */ + printf("%s: %s%s\n", name, pi.pi_data == 0 ? "not " : "", "attached"); } Index: pciconf.8 =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.8,v retrieving revision 1.3.2.1 diff -u -2 -r1.3.2.1 pciconf.8 - --- pciconf.8 1997/10/08 10:33:10 1.3.2.1 +++ pciconf.8 1998/02/17 21:28:24 @@ -33,4 +33,5 @@ .Sh SYNOPSIS .Nm pciconf Fl l +.Nm pciconf Fl a Ar selector .Nm pciconf Fl r Ar selector .Op Fl b | Fl h @@ -105,4 +106,14 @@ .Fl l can be used without modification. All numbers are base 10. +.Pp +With the +.Fl a +flag, +.Nm +determines whether any driver has been assigned to the device +identified by +.Ar selector . +An exit status of zero indicates that the device has a driver; +non-zero indicates that it does not. .Pp The - --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=loadlkm #!/bin/sh # # Put this script into a new directory /etc/pci under the name "loadlkm" and # make /etc/rc call it early (may have to load network interface drivers) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 04:30:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA11132 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 04:30:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from axp5.physik.fu-berlin.de (axp5-fddi.physik.fu-berlin.de [160.45.34.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA11125 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 04:30:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thimm@oberon.physik.fu-berlin.de) Received: from oberon.physik.fu-berlin.de (oberon.physik.fu-berlin.de [160.45.33.83]) by axp5.physik.fu-berlin.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA19245; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:30:08 +0100 (MET) Received: (from thimm@localhost) by oberon.physik.fu-berlin.de (8.8.5/8.7.1) id NAA03362; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:30:07 +0100 (MET) From: Axel Thimm Message-Id: <199803061230.NAA03362@oberon.physik.fu-berlin.de> Subject: rc: rm -f /var/run/* To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:30:07 +0100 (MET) Cc: Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de (Axel Thimm) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Shouldn't this line in /etc/rc read `rm -fr /var/run/*' ? xemacs is creating a directory there, for example. -- Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de Axel.Thimm@ifh.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 06:00:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA24277 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 06:00:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bigbrother ([206.29.49.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA24252 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 06:00:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vshah@rstcorp.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by bigbrother (8.6.12/8.6.9) id JAA25302; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:53:51 -0500 Received: from fault.rstcorp.com(206.29.49.18) by bigbrother.rstcorp.com via smap (V2.0) id xma025299; Fri, 6 Mar 98 09:53:28 -0500 Received: (from vshah@localhost) by rstcorp.com (8.8.1/8.8.1) id IAA24167; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 08:58:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 08:58:20 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199803061358.IAA24167@rstcorp.com> From: "Viren R. Shah" To: Snob Art Genre Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re:-stable suitable for small-enterprise NFS server? In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.40 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: "Viren R. Shah" X-Face: )~y+U*K:yzjz{q<5lzpI_SVef'U.])9g[C9`1N@]u3,MHY7f*l7C)[_NjM4y4K8$uIUh|\u (K&&HS6,M!61&GMTk'mqmB/Qg]]X}"?TzsFl]"2v!bl8']dma.:^IY^a[lbOI>U:b<~FyK3q-p{HmZ mn~g.`~BE!5{2D:}Yi+\_KkWe?XaHj9$ko1k8iKLYv5*_2c8"G=?Up[}hn+7RNM(bzBZ_wWk6!Pf&B ?3Tcm7M7B~W%K/I0aX3]*=jP?aM]H6HBPT`oLk+0n^_;N\2\%|Rhy;p}34Q.jEsM\qtnxcm;ag%Nq Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Ben" == Snob Art Genre writes: Ben> I can't imagine that this would be the case . . . but are there any NFS Ben> issues I should know about before building a ~12-user -stable NFS box? I had asked a similar question a while back (couple of weeks ago). You can check the mailing list archives. The gist of it was: 1. Always use nfs v2 mounts -- use mountd with the -2 flag, and expressly tell nfs clients to use nfs v2 mounts, for e.g. in solaris use the "vers=2" option in vfstab(?). 2. nfs v3 is more unreliable than nfs v2, at least in FreeBSD 3. Get a decent card (Intel Ether Express is a good one right now). Unfortunately, we're stuck with a 3com 3c905 (vx0), which seems to work ok so far, but doesn't give great performance. >From my testing so far, with a 2.2.5-STABLE (980303-SNAP) nfs server: 1. SunOS 4.1.x clients : very reliable. 2. Solaris 2.5.1: still testing 3. AIX and Linux: will be testing. Ben> Ben Viren -- Viren R. Shah "Creeping featurism is a disease, fatal if not treated promptly" -- Don Norman in _The Design of Everyday Things_ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 07:05:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA05003 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:05:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA04997 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:05:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA28977; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:05:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:05:21 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons To: David Greenman cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f In-Reply-To: <199803060810.AAA25503@implode.root.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk My kernel.old is from saturday (2/28) and doesn't display the problem. Did I mention that I'm running a P90 overclocked to 333mhz? (Just kidding, the hardware is conventional and very stable.) -Chris On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, David Greenman wrote: > >I sent David Greenman some info about a fatal trap 12 - page fault in > >kernel mode panic I'm getting with this morning's -stable kernel. > > > >it stops cvsup to my ccd /home cold in about the same place every time. > > > >#10 0xf01304d7 in getnewbuf (slpflag=0, slptimeo=0, size=3072, > >maxsize=8192) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:957#10 0xf01304d7 in getnewbuf > >(slpflag=0, slptimeo=0, size=3072, maxsize=8192) at > >../../kern/vfs_bio.c:957 > > Yes, this is disturbing. I don't understand how the fix I brought in > could cause that panic (being in a different part of the code and ineffective > for all filesystems except NFS client), but stranger things have happened. > > -DG > > David Greenman > Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 07:40:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA08981 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:40:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from GndRsh.aac.dev.com (GndRsh.aac.dev.com [207.149.232.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA08966 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:40:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com) Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by GndRsh.aac.dev.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA01073; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:37:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rgrimes) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199803061537.HAA01073@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: RAID Controllers In-Reply-To: from Alexander Tatmaniants at "Mar 6, 98 12:33:59 pm" To: alex@UkrCard.COM (Alexander Tatmaniants) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:37:53 -0800 (PST) Cc: tom@uniserve.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, lrios wrote: > > > > > Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand > > > of controllers will it support?? > > > If any would be appreciated.. > > > > - Any kind of SCSI-SCSI RAID box > Can you provide me an example of boards and manufacturers? www.cmd.com, look at the CRD5440. If you need a source for them we are a CMD reseller, CRD5440's go for $2517 in singles, price gets better if you want 2 or more. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation, Inc. Reliable computers for FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 08:03:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA11423 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 08:03:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gjp.erols.com (alex-va-n008c243.moon.jic.com [206.156.18.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA11414 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 08:03:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) Received: from gjp.erols.com (localhost.erols.com [127.0.0.1]) by gjp.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA25419; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 11:02:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Alexander Tatmaniants cc: Tom , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: RAID Controllers In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Mar 1998 12:33:59 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 11:02:17 -0500 Message-ID: <25416.889200137@gjp.erols.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Alexander Tatmaniants wrote in message ID : > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, lrios wrote: > > - Any kind of SCSI-SCSI RAID box > Can you provide me an example of boards and manufacturers? CMD, DMI. Both should have WWW pages. I believe Symbios also does SCSI2SCSI RAID (I think the Sun RSM product is their stuff rebadged) Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 09:48:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA21398 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:48:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freebie.dcfinc.com (freebie.dcfinc.com [138.113.2.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA21305 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:47:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freebie.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freebie.dcfinc.com (8.8.7/8.8.3a) id KAA02622; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 10:45:05 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <199803061745.KAA02622@freebie.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Request for next release To: witr@rwwa.com (Robert Withrow) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 10:45:05 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199803051335.IAA11684@spooky.rwwa.com> from Robert Withrow at "Mar 5, 98 08:35:50 am" Reply-to: chad@dcfinc.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > CD's are used for? Well, the first one you install from, the second one is the live filesystem (very useful with the boot floppy to run FreeBSD on a system you don't have permission to install on, or as the worlds most complete "fixit" disk), the third has the complete CVS repository (which allows you to extract =any= version that has existed, and to see the comment history if you're curious what was changed and why) and the fourth has contributed software (presumably gettoized to avoid confusion over who is supporting it). But I agree, that second pair of CDs seemed a bit like a marketing-driven "mine is bigger than your's". Any suggestions for what ought to be on two and half gigabytes of media? -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL22) Brother, can you paradigm? 602-953-1392 chad@dcfinc.com chad@anasazi.com larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 09:59:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA23946 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:59:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA23917 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:59:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA00705; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:54:59 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803061754.JAA00705@implode.root.com> To: Chris Timmons cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Mar 1998 07:05:21 PST." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 09:54:59 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >My kernel.old is from saturday (2/28) and doesn't display the problem. >Did I mention that I'm running a P90 overclocked to 333mhz? (Just >kidding, the hardware is conventional and very stable.) Can you try backing out just the vfs_bio.c change and see if this also cures the problem? -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 11:34:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA08429 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 11:34:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA08387 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 11:33:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA02868; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 11:33:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 11:33:38 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons To: David Greenman cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f In-Reply-To: <199803061754.JAA00705@implode.root.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I'll do this but I won't have a chance until Saturday morning at the earliest. -Chris On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, David Greenman wrote: > >My kernel.old is from saturday (2/28) and doesn't display the problem. > >Did I mention that I'm running a P90 overclocked to 333mhz? (Just > >kidding, the hardware is conventional and very stable.) > > Can you try backing out just the vfs_bio.c change and see if this also > cures the problem? > > -DG > > David Greenman > Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 13:54:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA29977 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:54:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alushta.NL.net (alushta.NL.net [193.78.240.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA29964 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:54:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from benst@terminus.stuyts.nl) Received: from stuyts by alushta.NL.net with UUCP id <16732-21932>; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 22:54:02 +0100 Received: from daneel.stuyts.nl (daneel.stuyts.nl [193.78.231.7]) by terminus.stuyts.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA01661 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 22:46:57 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from benst) Received: (from benst@localhost) by daneel.stuyts.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA18832 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 22:46:11 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199803062146.WAA18832@daneel.stuyts.nl> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) In-Reply-To: <199803061230.NAA03362@oberon.physik.fu-berlin.de> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 3.3 (Enhance 1.2) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.118.2) From: Ben Stuyts Date: Fri, 6 Mar 98 22:46:07 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc: rm -f /var/run/* Reply-To: ben@stuyts.nl References: <199803061230.NAA03362@oberon.physik.fu-berlin.de> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Axel Thimm wrote: > Shouldn't this line in /etc/rc read `rm -fr /var/run/*' ? > xemacs is creating a directory there, for example. sudo too. The problem is both in -stable and in -current. Best regards, Ben To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 15:15:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA09718 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:15:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA09710 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:15:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA23599; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:12:40 -0800 (PST) To: chad@dcfinc.com cc: witr@rwwa.com (Robert Withrow), freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for next release In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Mar 1998 10:45:05 MST." <199803061745.KAA02622@freebie.dcfinc.com> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 15:12:40 -0800 Message-ID: <23595.889225960@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > But I agree, that second pair of CDs seemed a bit like a > marketing-driven "mine is bigger than your's". Not really - I got a lot of requests for the CVS repository and simply couldn't fit it on two, nor does the package collection fit on a single CD anymore. 4 was inevitable. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 15:39:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA12738 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:39:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kinetic.ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de (NAFp2-176.rz.uni-frankfurt.de [141.2.23.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA12292; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:36:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kinetic.ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA00320; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 00:35:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: sio0: X events for device with no tp Reply-To: marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de X-Mailer: Mew version 1.92.4 on Emacs 19.34 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19980307003520A.marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 00:35:20 +0100 From: User Marko Marko Schuetz X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024 Lines: 31 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I was using 2.2.5+PAO and am running -stable now. The PCCARD modem I use is a Megahertz XJ3288i. When I insert the modem it is correctly identified Mar 7 00:25:13 kinetic /kernel: Card inserted, slot 0 Mar 7 00:25:24 kinetic /kernel: sio1: type 16550A and I have iijppp configured to automatically start at modem insertion. BUT unless I disable sio0 at boot I get Mar 7 00:09:28 kinetic /kernel: sio1: type 16550A Mar 7 00:09:50 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 64 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:16 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 64 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:18 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 2 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:18 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 6 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:31 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 1 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:31 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 2 events for device with no tp . . . when I try to use the modem. It does work, but the "events with no tp" seem to make transfers very slow. I do not even understand what the message about ...not tp is trying to tell me, so I would be delighted if someone could explain or maybe even suggest a fix: currently I do not need sio0 so I can easily disable it at boot, but this may change... Marko To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 15:46:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13559 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:46:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA13521; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:45:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA01339; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:44:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803062344.PAA01339@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sio0: X events for device with no tp In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Mar 1998 00:35:20 +0100." <19980307003520A.marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 15:44:11 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I was using 2.2.5+PAO and am running -stable now. The PCCARD modem I > use is a Megahertz XJ3288i. > > When I insert the modem it is correctly identified > > Mar 7 00:25:13 kinetic /kernel: Card inserted, slot 0 > Mar 7 00:25:24 kinetic /kernel: sio1: type 16550A > > and I have iijppp configured to automatically start at modem > insertion. BUT unless I disable sio0 at boot I get > > Mar 7 00:09:28 kinetic /kernel: sio1: type 16550A > Mar 7 00:09:50 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 64 events for device with no tp Do you only get these if you have first run Windows/DOS? What sort of laptop are you using? Does it have an internal serial port? The messages are artifacts from the FIFO probe, but they show up too late, which normally means your serial interface works in an odd fashion. > when I try to use the modem. It does work, but the "events with no tp" > seem to make transfers very slow. If the modem is actually showing up on sio0, then it's possible that things are conflicting. Have you tried changing the configuration to move it to another port address? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 15:49:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13947 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:49:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA13931 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:49:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0yB6ri-0006fa-00; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:49:22 -0800 Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 15:49:20 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: for 2.2.6... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Can libc_r be built by default in 2.2.6? This adds about 1MB to /usr/lib Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 18:34:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA06749 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 18:34:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from const. (tulip12.verinet.com [199.45.181.204]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA06743; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 18:34:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from allenc@verinet.com) Received: (from allenc@localhost) by const. (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA20153; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 19:34:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from allenc) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 19:34:18 -0700 (MST) From: allen campbell Message-Id: <199803070234.TAA20153@const.> To: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for next release Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > But I agree, that second pair of CDs seemed a bit like a > > marketing-driven "mine is bigger than your's". > > Not really - I got a lot of requests for the CVS repository and simply > couldn't fit it on two, nor does the package collection fit on a single > CD anymore. 4 was inevitable. The last time I picked up a Yggdrasil Linux distribution it was six disks. 650 Meg just isn't that much anymore. :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 20:33:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA20618 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 20:33:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us (root@duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us [207.160.214.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA20610; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 20:33:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us) Received: from duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us (cdillon@duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us [207.160.214.9]) by duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA00295; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 22:32:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 22:32:55 -0600 (CST) From: Chris Dillon X-Sender: cdillon@duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us To: allen campbell cc: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for next release In-Reply-To: <199803070234.TAA20153@const.> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, allen campbell wrote: > > > But I agree, that second pair of CDs seemed a bit like a > > > marketing-driven "mine is bigger than your's". > > > > Not really - I got a lot of requests for the CVS repository and simply > > couldn't fit it on two, nor does the package collection fit on a single > > CD anymore. 4 was inevitable. > > The last time I picked up a Yggdrasil Linux distribution it was > six disks. 650 Meg just isn't that much anymore. :) > Just imagine what we'll be able to fit on a single DVD disk, once they become standard. :-) Anyone seen any SCSI DVD players, by the way? Seems the only ones I've seen are IDE (bleh). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 20:40:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA21269 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 20:40:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from socko.cdnow.com (socko.cdnow.com [209.83.166.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA21263; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 20:40:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from heller@daria.cdnow.com) Received: from daria.cdnow.com (daria.cdnow.com [209.83.166.60]) by socko.cdnow.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA19997; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 23:40:21 -0500 (EST) Received: (from heller@localhost) by daria.cdnow.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA24860; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 23:40:15 -0500 (EST) From: "A. Karl Heller" Message-Id: <199803070440.XAA24860@daria.cdnow.com> Subject: Re: bind To: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 23:40:15 -0500 (EST) Cc: vance@usq.edu.au, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: heller@cdnow.com In-Reply-To: <14623.889153150@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Mar 5, 98 06:59:10 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk What kind of process do you do to get packages in shape for inclusion? Other than the "it compiles out of the box" source code, what tests are run, or at least, what has kept perl5 out of the FreeBSD package? Karl > > I can't expect the sendmail situation to change but one could ask: > > Which version of BIND will go in 2.2.6-R and later -STABLEs? > The same one that shipped with 2.2.5. > > And while I'm at it, should I assume that perl will stay at 4? > Yep. We've still yet to find someone to bmake perl5 and get it into > the proper shape for inclusion in -current, much less -stable. :( > Jordan > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Karl Heller | It is foolhardy to assume that jiggling X Senior Systems Engineer | will not diddle Y, however unlikely. CDnow Inc. | MSG FROM OPERATOR : http://cdnow.com | OUR HAMSTER IS SICK. SYSTEM SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATELY. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 6 22:29:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA02061 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 22:29:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA02047; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 22:29:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA25231; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 22:28:30 -0800 (PST) To: heller@cdnow.com cc: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG (Jordan K. Hubbard), vance@usq.edu.au, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bind In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Mar 1998 23:40:15 EST." <199803070440.XAA24860@daria.cdnow.com> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 22:28:30 -0800 Message-ID: <25227.889252110@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > What kind of process do you do to get packages in shape for > inclusion? Other than the "it compiles out of the box" source code, > what tests are run, or at least, what has kept perl5 out of the > FreeBSD package? They need to build with Berkeley Make, e.g. "bmaked". For references, see /usr/src/contrib and some of the packages already there. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 02:04:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA17973 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:04:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kinetic.ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de (NAFp2-048.rz.uni-frankfurt.de [141.2.23.48]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA17936; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:04:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kinetic.ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA00313; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 10:54:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de) To: mike@smith.net.au Cc: marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sio0: X events for device with no tp Reply-To: marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Mar 1998 15:44:11 -0800" <199803062344.PAA01339@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <199803062344.PAA01339@dingo.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mew version 1.92.4 on Emacs 19.34 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <19980307105409R.marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 10:54:09 +0100 From: User Marko Marko Schuetz X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024 Lines: 68 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id CAA17938 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk From: Mike Smith Subject: Re: sio0: X events for device with no tp Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 15:44:11 -0800 > > I was using 2.2.5+PAO and am running -stable now. The PCCARD modem I > > use is a Megahertz XJ3288i. > > > > When I insert the modem it is correctly identified > > > > Mar 7 00:25:13 kinetic /kernel: Card inserted, slot 0 > > Mar 7 00:25:24 kinetic /kernel: sio1: type 16550A > > > > and I have iijppp configured to automatically start at modem > > insertion. BUT unless I disable sio0 at boot I get > > > > Mar 7 00:09:28 kinetic /kernel: sio1: type 16550A > > Mar 7 00:09:50 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 64 events for device with no tp > > Do you only get these if you have first run Windows/DOS? There is no such thing on this machine. > What sort of laptop are you using? Does it have an internal serial > port? It is a Portege 610CT and does have one internal serial port, one internal printer port and the docking adapter. > The messages are artifacts from the FIFO probe, but they show up too > late, which normally means your serial interface works in an odd fashion. > > > when I try to use the modem. It does work, but the "events with no tp" > > seem to make transfers very slow. > > If the modem is actually showing up on sio0, then it's possible that > things are conflicting. Have you tried changing the configuration to > move it to another port address? Ok, this is the hint I seemed to need: In the kernel configuration I have: sio0 at 0x3f8 irq 4 sio1 at 0x2f8 irq 3 But the default (0x1) configuration for the modem had it at 0x3f8. I changed ætc/pccard.conf to use configuration 0x3 which uses 0x2f8 and the problem seems to be solved. Thank you very much Marko To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 02:42:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA20138 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:42:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp4.nwnexus.com (smtp4.nwnexus.com [206.63.63.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA20116; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:41:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wrsomsky@halcyon.com) Received: from gramarye (evt-lx100-ip31.nwnexus.net [204.57.235.31]) by smtp4.nwnexus.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA25453; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:41:50 -0800 (PST) Received: (from wrsomsky@localhost) by gramarye (8.8.8/8.8.7) id CAA00832; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:38:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wrsomsky) From: "William R. Somsky" Message-Id: <199803071038.CAA00832.gramarye.wrsomsky@halcyon.com> Subject: Re: bind In-Reply-To: <25227.889252110@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Mar 6, 98 10:28:30 pm" To: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:38:52 -0800 (PST) Cc: heller@cdnow.com, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, vance@usq.edu.au, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > What kind of process do you do to get packages in shape for > > inclusion? Other than the "it compiles out of the box" source code, > > what tests are run, or at least, what has kept perl5 out of the > > FreeBSD package? > > They need to build with Berkeley Make, e.g. "bmaked". > > For references, see /usr/src/contrib and some of the packages > already there. Um... I'm confused... /usr/src/contrib looks like the original code to these things. At least in -stable. Isn't /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin the "bmake-ified" versions where they're actually built from? And we're talking about making perl5 the "default" perl, ie the perl in /usr/bin/perl -- as opposed to the "port" perl, /usr/local/bin/perl, which already exists and works, right? I was thinking of taking a look at this, and rapidly saw that it's not a trivial task, so had to skip it. But for future reference, I assume what's wanted here is to unpack, pre-"configure" and "bmake-ify" any such package so that it builds as part of, and in the same style as, a "make world" -- as opposed to the "use the packages own configure script, but trigger the right responses" that the ports use? ________________________________________________________________________ William R. Somsky wrsomsky@halcyon.com Physicist, Baritone, Guitarist http://www.halcyon.com/wrsomsky To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 02:49:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA21227 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:49:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA21167; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:49:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA27424; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 02:47:59 -0800 (PST) To: "William R. Somsky" cc: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG (Jordan K. Hubbard), heller@cdnow.com, vance@usq.edu.au, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bind In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Mar 1998 02:38:52 PST." <199803071038.CAA00832.gramarye.wrsomsky@halcyon.com> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 02:47:59 -0800 Message-ID: <27420.889267679@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Um... I'm confused... /usr/src/contrib looks like the original code > to these things. At least in -stable. Isn't /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin > the "bmake-ified" versions where they're actually built from? Yes, this is the part that needs to be done. Vendor-branch importing the originals, modulo the removal of any components not strictly needed by FreeBSD, is the easy part. Then you need to construct the bmake "skeletons" that actually build the bits. In former times the two were combined and /usr/src/contrib didn't exist at all, but we've made it somewhat cleaner now. > And we're talking about making perl5 the "default" perl, > ie the perl in /usr/bin/perl -- as opposed to the "port" perl, > /usr/local/bin/perl, which already exists and works, right? Correct. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 07:16:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA16813 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 07:16:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Octopussy.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (Octopussy.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.166.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA16757; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 07:15:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from se@dialup124.zpr.uni-koeln.de) Received: from dialup124.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE (dialup124.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.219.124]) by Octopussy.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA06959; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 16:14:38 +0100 (MET) Received: (from se@localhost) by dialup124.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.8.8/8.6.9) id NAA00760; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 13:24:19 +0100 (CET) X-Face: " Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 13:24:18 +0100 From: Stefan Esser To: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, dg@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: PCI LKM support added to -stable Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi! I finally managed to build and boot a -stable test kernel on my -current system. There was a mismatch between a header file in /sys/pci and some use of a structure defined therein from /sys/i386/isa/pcibus.c, which had caused interrupt registration to fail with the version I had sent out as a beta of this code before. In order to automatically load PCI LKMs at system startup, I suggest to make the following changes to the startup scripts: 1) Modify /etc/rc to source /etc/rc.lkm, if present 2) Add /etc/rc.lkm, which is a NOP unless /lkm/pci/lkm.map exists 3) Create an empty /lkm/pci (-> mtree) 4) Add a sample lkm.map file, which explains that the format is to have a PCI device/vendor ID in hex in the first column, and the LKM name (without the trailing .o) as the second. Is anybody opposed to these changes ? Are there any further suggestions ? I plan to commit these changes tomorrow! Regards, STefan The following patches should be applied in /etc: *** /dev/null Sat Mar 7 03:49:58 1998 --- rc.lkm Sat Mar 7 03:52:47 1998 *************** *** 0 **** --- 1,23 ---- + #!/bin/sh + # + # Expected format of /lkm/pci/lkm.map: + # + # 0x0350109E brkt BrookTree 848 + # 0x802910ec if_ed RealTek 8029 NE2000 compatible Ethernet + # + + if [ -r /lkm/pci/lkm.map ] + then + for dev in `pciconf -l |cut -f1` + do + if pciconf -a $dev | grep -q "not attached" + then + DevVendorID=`pciconf -r $dev 0` + LKM=`sed -e 's/#.*//' /lkm/pci/lkm.map | \ + grep $DevVendorID | cut -f 2` + LKMfile=/lkm/pci/$LKM.o + echo "$dev Loading $LKMfile for DevVendorID $DevVendorID" + modload $LKMfile + fi + done + fi Index: rc =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/rc,v retrieving revision 1.104.2.33 diff -C2 -r1.104.2.33 rc *** rc 1998/02/15 14:24:47 1.104.2.33 --- rc 1998/03/07 11:45:40 *************** *** 112,115 **** --- 112,120 ---- fi + # load PCI LKM drivers + if [ -f /etc/rc.lkm ]; then + . /etc/rc.lkm + fi + # start up PC-card configuration if [ -f /etc/rc.pccard ]; then To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 08:31:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA23212 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 08:31:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA23183; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 08:30:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA15640; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 08:29:09 -0800 (PST) To: Stefan Esser cc: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, dg@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI LKM support added to -stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Mar 1998 13:24:18 +0100." <19980307132418.34637@mi.uni-koeln.de> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 08:29:09 -0800 Message-ID: <15635.889288149@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Is anybody opposed to these changes ? Sounds like something we can live with, though I wonder why you propose to make a new rc.lkm file rather than simply modifying rc to do the right thing when /lkm/pci/lkm.map is found? /etc/rc.lkm seems to be a mostly gratuitous creation of another file. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 09:23:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA26118 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 09:23:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Octopussy.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (Octopussy.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.166.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA26088; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 09:22:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from se@dialup124.zpr.uni-koeln.de) Received: from dialup124.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE (dialup124.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.219.124]) by Octopussy.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA07848; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 18:22:33 +0100 (MET) Received: (from se@localhost) by dialup124.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.8.8/8.6.9) id SAA10766; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 18:21:12 +0100 (CET) X-Face: " Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 18:21:10 +0100 From: Stefan Esser To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: dg@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Stefan Esser Subject: Re: PCI LKM support added to -stable References: <19980307132418.34637@mi.uni-koeln.de> <15635.889288149@time.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i In-Reply-To: <15635.889288149@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Sat, Mar 07, 1998 at 08:29:09AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 1998-03-07 08:29 -0800, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > Sounds like something we can live with, though I wonder why you > propose to make a new rc.lkm file rather than simply modifying rc to > do the right thing when /lkm/pci/lkm.map is found? /etc/rc.lkm > seems to be a mostly gratuitous creation of another file. Ok. I don't need a separate file, but thought it was easier to get this change accepted, if it was kept in a file of its own. If you don't mind making /etc/rc more complex than it currently is, then I'm going to merge the PCI LKM support in. What about the location of the PCI LKM loadable modules ? I have suggested to create a new directory (/lkm/pci) for them, but there is no technical reason to not put them directly into /lkm. How about the location of the file that maps PCI vendor/device IDs to module names. Should it reside with the LKMs, or be found in /etc ? Regards, STefan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 10:05:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA29920 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 10:05:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA29886; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 10:04:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA12992; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 11:04:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA03670; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 11:04:39 -0700 Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 11:04:39 -0700 Message-Id: <199803071804.LAA03670@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 To: marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de Cc: mike@smith.net.au, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sio0: X events for device with no tp In-Reply-To: <19980307105409R.marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de> References: <199803062344.PAA01339@dingo.cdrom.com> <19980307105409R.marko@cs.uni-frankfurt.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id KAA29889 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > If the modem is actually showing up on sio0, then it's possible that > > things are conflicting. Have you tried changing the configuration to > > move it to another port address? > > Ok, this is the hint I seemed to need: In the kernel configuration I > have: > > sio0 at 0x3f8 irq 4 > sio1 at 0x2f8 irq 3 > > But the default (0x1) configuration for the modem had it at 0x3f8. > I changed ætc/pccard.conf to use configuration 0x3 which uses 0x2f8 > and the problem seems to be solved. Ahh, an I/O port conflict. Yes, that (along with the rest of allocated resources) isn't done as nicely as it could be. I/O ports should be able to be allocated by the driver (like IRQ's), but it appears that the code as written requires the ports in the driver in the kernel config file to be the same as the PCCARD I/O ports in the config entry. I spaced this requirement, sorry. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 10:35:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA02901 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 10:35:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from netcom1.netcom.com (mvh@netcom16.netcom.com [192.100.81.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA02880 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 10:35:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mvh@netcom1.netcom.com) Received: (from mvh@localhost) by netcom1.netcom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA02266; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 10:34:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mvh) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 10:34:33 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803071834.KAA02266@netcom1.netcom.com> From: "Michael V. Harding" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: this morning's snap does not install... Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I did a 'make distribution' in /usr/src/etc, and it still didn't work.. ===> share/termcap install -c -o bin -g bin -m 444 termcap termcap.db /usr/share/misc install -c -o bin -g bin -m 444 /usr/src/share/termcap/map3270 /usr/share/misc install -c -o bin -g bin -m 444 termcap.5.gz /usr/share/man/man5 ===> share/timedef ===> share/timedef/data for l in da_DK.ISO_8859-1 de_AT.ISO_8859-1 de_DE.ISO_8859-1 en_GB.ISO_8859-1 en_US.ISO_8859-1 es_ES.ISO_8859-1 fi_FI.ISO_8859-1 fr_FR.ISO_8859-1 hr_HR.ISO_8859-2 is_IS.ISO_8859-1 ja_JP.EUC ja_JP.SJIS it_IT.ISO_8859-1 ko_KR.EUC lt_LN.ISO_8859-1 nl_NL.ISO_8859-1 no_NO.ISO_8859-1 pl_PL.ISO_8859-2 pt_PT.ISO_8859-1 ru_SU.CP866 ru_SU.KOI8-R sl_SI.ISO_8859-2 sv_SE.ISO_8859-1; do install -c -m 644 -o bin -g bin $l.out /usr/share/locale/$l/LC_TIME; done install: /usr/share/locale/pl_PL.ISO_8859-2/LC_TIME: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 11:41:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA08154 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 11:41:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA08145 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 11:40:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from giffunip@asme.org) Received: from giffuni.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.32]) by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0) with SMTP id AAA25074 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 14:44:06 +0500 Message-ID: <3501A2C8.794BDF32@asme.org> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 14:40:56 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: U. Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: XFree86-3.3.2 is out ... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Being optimistic... Any chance the new Xfree86 will make it to 2.2.6-R? I heard it's only a minor update with new features, but the "real" stuff, like the code donated by Metrolink will have to wait for 3.4. cheers, Pedro. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 15:00:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA24247 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 15:00:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA24239 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 15:00:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA01342; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 14:59:01 -0800 (PST) To: "Michael V. Harding" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: this morning's snap does not install... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Mar 1998 10:34:33 PST." <199803071834.KAA02266@netcom1.netcom.com> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 14:59:01 -0800 Message-ID: <1338.889311541@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I did a 'make distribution' in /usr/src/etc, and it still didn't > work.. Fixed - I somehow missed the mtree changes to go with the new locale stuff. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 15:03:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA24975 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 15:03:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA24927 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 15:03:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA01398; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 15:01:58 -0800 (PST) To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86-3.3.2 is out ... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Mar 1998 14:40:56 EST." <3501A2C8.794BDF32@asme.org> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 15:01:58 -0800 Message-ID: <1395.889311718@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Any chance the new Xfree86 will make it to 2.2.6-R? I heard it's only a > minor update with new features, but the "real" stuff, like the code > donated by Metrolink will have to wait for 3.4. Yes, I'm planning on shipping the new bits. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 7 19:36:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA21188 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 19:36:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from beach.utmb.edu (beach.utmb.edu [129.109.212.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA20989 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 19:35:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from POSTMASTER@MSPO2.MED.UTMB.EDU) From: POSTMASTER@MSPO2.MED.UTMB.EDU Received: from GALV8TH.utmb.edu by BEACH.UTMB.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #18539) with SMTP id <01IUEE8MXP7K000LEI@BEACH.UTMB.EDU> for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 21:32:20 CDT Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 21:33:00 -0600 Subject: Mail failure To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <01IUEE8MZXLE000LEI@BEACH.UTMB.EDU> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Worldtalk (NetConnex V4.00a)/MIME Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id TAA20990 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk FROM: UTMB/MSPO2/POSTMASTER TO: stable@FreeBSD.ORG DATE: 03/07/98 TIME: 21:36 SUBJECT: Mail failure ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [002] Mail was received for unknown addresses. Message was not delivered to UTMB/MSPO2/ehymel (UTMB/MSPO2/ehymel) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ stable-digest Saturday, March 7 1998 Volume 04 : Number 028 In this issue: rc: rm -f /var/run/* Re:-stable suitable for small-enterprise NFS server? Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f Re: RAID Controllers Re: RAID Controllers Re: Request for next release Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f Re: rc: rm -f /var/run/* Re: Request for next release sio0: X events for device with no tp Re: sio0: X events for device with no tp for 2.2.6... Re: Request for next release Re: Request for next release Re: bind Re: bind Re: sio0: X events for device with no tp Re: bind Re: bind PCI LKM support added to -stable ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:30:07 +0100 (MET) From: Axel Thimm Subject: rc: rm -f /var/run/* Shouldn't this line in /etc/rc read `rm -fr /var/run/*' ? xemacs is creating a directory there, for example. - -- Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de Axel.Thimm@ifh.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 08:58:20 -0500 (EST) From: "Viren R. Shah" Subject: Re:-stable suitable for small-enterprise NFS server? >>>>> "Ben" == Snob Art Genre writes: Ben> I can't imagine that this would be the case . . . but are there any NFS Ben> issues I should know about before building a ~12-user -stable NFS box? I had asked a similar question a while back (couple of weeks ago). You can check the mailing list archives. The gist of it was: 1. Always use nfs v2 mounts -- use mountd with the -2 flag, and expressly tell nfs clients to use nfs v2 mounts, for e.g. in solaris use the "vers=2" option in vfstab(?). 2. nfs v3 is more unreliable than nfs v2, at least in FreeBSD 3. Get a decent card (Intel Ether Express is a good one right now). Unfortunately, we're stuck with a 3com 3c905 (vx0), which seems to work ok so far, but doesn't give great performance. >From my testing so far, with a 2.2.5-STABLE (980303-SNAP) nfs server: 1. SunOS 4.1.x clients : very reliable. 2. Solaris 2.5.1: still testing 3. AIX and Linux: will be testing. Ben> Ben Viren - -- Viren R. Shah "Creeping featurism is a disease, fatal if not treated promptly" -- Don Norman in _The Design of Everyday Things_ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:05:21 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons Subject: Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f My kernel.old is from saturday (2/28) and doesn't display the problem. Did I mention that I'm running a P90 overclocked to 333mhz? (Just kidding, the hardware is conventional and very stable.) - -Chris On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, David Greenman wrote: > >I sent David Greenman some info about a fatal trap 12 - page fault in > >kernel mode panic I'm getting with this morning's -stable kernel. > > > >it stops cvsup to my ccd /home cold in about the same place every time. > > > >#10 0xf01304d7 in getnewbuf (slpflag=0, slptimeo=0, size=3072, > >maxsize=8192) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:957#10 0xf01304d7 in getnewbuf > >(slpflag=0, slptimeo=0, size=3072, maxsize=8192) at > >../../kern/vfs_bio.c:957 > > Yes, this is disturbing. I don't understand how the fix I brought in > could cause that panic (being in a different part of the code and ineffective > for all filesystems except NFS client), but stranger things have happened. > > -DG > > David Greenman > Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 07:37:53 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Subject: Re: RAID Controllers > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, lrios wrote: > > > > > Does Free BSD 2-2-5 have support for RAID controllers?? If so what brand > > > of controllers will it support?? > > > If any would be appreciated.. > > > > - Any kind of SCSI-SCSI RAID box > Can you provide me an example of boards and manufacturers? www.cmd.com, look at the CRD5440. If you need a source for them we are a CMD reseller, CRD5440's go for $2517 in singles, price gets better if you want 2 or more. - -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation, Inc. Reliable computers for FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 11:02:17 -0500 From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: RAID Controllers Alexander Tatmaniants wrote in message ID : > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Tom wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, lrios wrote: > > - Any kind of SCSI-SCSI RAID box > Can you provide me an example of boards and manufacturers? CMD, DMI. Both should have WWW pages. I believe Symbios also does SCSI2SCSI RAID (I think the Sun RSM product is their stuff rebadged) Gary - -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 10:45:05 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" Subject: Re: Request for next release > If the next CDROM release of -stable is intended to be a 4 CD monster, > would it be possible for the insert to give detailed instructions > and information to dummies like me about what exactly each of the > CD's are used for? Well, the first one you install from, the second one is the live filesystem (very useful with the boot floppy to run FreeBSD on a system you don't have permission to install on, or as the worlds most complete "fixit" disk), the third has the complete CVS repository (which allows you to extract =any= version that has existed, and to see the comment history if you're curious what was changed and why) and the fourth has contributed software (presumably gettoized to avoid confusion over who is supporting it). But I agree, that second pair of CDs seemed a bit like a marketing-driven "mine is bigger than your's". Any suggestions for what ought to be on two and half gigabytes of media? -crl - -- Chad R. Larson (CRL22) Brother, can you paradigm? 602-953-1392 chad@dcfinc.com chad@anasazi.com larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 09:54:59 -0800 From: David Greenman Subject: Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f >My kernel.old is from saturday (2/28) and doesn't display the problem. >Did I mention that I'm running a P90 overclocked to 333mhz? (Just >kidding, the hardware is conventional and very stable.) Can you try backing out just the vfs_bio.c change and see if this also cures the problem? - -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 11:33:38 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons Subject: Re: panic in vfs_bio.c getnewbuf+0x21f I'll do this but I won't have a chance until Saturday morning at the earliest. - -Chris On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, David Greenman wrote: > >My kernel.old is from saturday (2/28) and doesn't display the problem. > >Did I mention that I'm running a P90 overclocked to 333mhz? (Just > >kidding, the hardware is conventional and very stable.) > > Can you try backing out just the vfs_bio.c change and see if this also > cures the problem? > > -DG > > David Greenman > Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Mar 98 22:46:07 +0100 From: Ben Stuyts Subject: Re: rc: rm -f /var/run/* On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Axel Thimm wrote: > Shouldn't this line in /etc/rc read `rm -fr /var/run/*' ? > xemacs is creating a directory there, for example. sudo too. The problem is both in -stable and in -current. Best regards, Ben To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 15:12:40 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: Request for next release > But I agree, that second pair of CDs seemed a bit like a > marketing-driven "mine is bigger than your's". Not really - I got a lot of requests for the CVS repository and simply couldn't fit it on two, nor does the package collection fit on a single CD anymore. 4 was inevitable. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 00:35:20 +0100 From: User Marko Marko Schuetz Subject: sio0: X events for device with no tp I was using 2.2.5+PAO and am running -stable now. The PCCARD modem I use is a Megahertz XJ3288i. When I insert the modem it is correctly identified Mar 7 00:25:13 kinetic /kernel: Card inserted, slot 0 Mar 7 00:25:24 kinetic /kernel: sio1: type 16550A and I have iijppp configured to automatically start at modem insertion. BUT unless I disable sio0 at boot I get Mar 7 00:09:28 kinetic /kernel: sio1: type 16550A Mar 7 00:09:50 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 64 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:16 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 64 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:18 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 2 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:18 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 6 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:31 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 1 events for device with no tp Mar 7 00:10:31 kinetic /kernel: sio0: 2 events for device with no tp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message