From owner-freebsd-atm  Sun Feb 21 21: 5:53 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org
Received: from piglet.dstc.edu.au (piglet.dstc.edu.au [130.102.176.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3051163E
	for <freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 21:05:47 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ggm@asuncion.dstc.edu.au)
Received: from asuncion.dstc.edu.au (asuncion.dstc.edu.au [130.102.176.155])
	by piglet.dstc.edu.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA12860
	for <freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:05:46 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from ggm@localhost)
	by asuncion.dstc.edu.au (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id PAA08451
	for freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:05:45 +1000 (EST)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:05:45 +1000 (EST)
From: George Michaelson <ggm@dstc.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199902220505.PAA08451@asuncion.dstc.edu.au>
To: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Efficient Networks cards or FORE cards in FreeBSD 3.1?
Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


We have quotes from local suppliers (in OZ) for both Efficient Networks
and FORE's PCI atm cards.

Can anybody let me know:

	1) do both still work in FreeBSD 3.1 ok for classic ip-over-atm
	   in a PVC only world?

	2) are there major relative differences between the codebase for
	   these cards?

FYI the FORE card is significantly cheaper: 2/3 or so of the E-N card.

cheers
	-George


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message