From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Sep 2 4:32:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from mailbox.univie.ac.at (mailbox.univie.ac.at [131.130.1.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D996D14F02 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 04:32:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bauer@cc.univie.ac.at) Received: from cc.univie.ac.at (pckb.cc.univie.ac.at [131.130.2.125]) by mailbox.univie.ac.at (8.8.8/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA48316 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:32:34 +0200 Message-ID: <37CE6064.5B9D184D@cc.univie.ac.at> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 13:32:52 +0200 From: Kurt Bauer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: no ping :-(((( Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, First let me give you a little overview of my configuration: - FreeBSD 3.2 - Efficient Networks ENI155 ATM-Interface - Kerneloptions: * device en0 * device enp0 * options atm * options NATM * Host IP-Adr. 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 * end-point(routers) IP-Adr. 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 * AAL5 - LLC/SNAP * VPI 0 * VCI 404 (0x194) When BSD boots everything works fine, the ATM-NIC is initialized and the Kernel prints out the right messages. Then I do an ' ifconfig en0 10.1.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 up ' and the Interface is up and has the right IP-address. Next I do a ' route add -iface 10.1.1.1 -link en0:2.0.1.94 " and the route is added which I see with 'netstat -r' But when I try to ping my local interface (10.1.1.2), the following massages appears ' wsww/kernel: atmlookup failed: no llinfo' and then 'ping: sendto: no route to host'. When I try to ping the routers interface(10.1.1.1) the same thing happens (no route to host). It all works fine with Linux, so the problem is neither the router nor the ATM-sneak nor the cables, but the BSD-box. Has anyone a guess what can be wrong ???? Thanks in advance, Kurt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Sep 2 4:45:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from mailbox.univie.ac.at (mailbox.univie.ac.at [131.130.1.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB6914D75 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 04:45:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bauer@cc.univie.ac.at) Received: from cc.univie.ac.at (pckb.cc.univie.ac.at [131.130.2.125]) by mailbox.univie.ac.at (8.8.8/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA46440 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:45:46 +0200 Message-ID: <37CE637C.99F34E03@cc.univie.ac.at> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 13:46:04 +0200 From: Kurt Bauer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: no ping :-((((( Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org A little Layout-problem in the first try, Sorry ;-))) Hi, First let me give you a little overview of my configuration: - FreeBSD 3.2 - Efficient Networks ENI155 ATM-Interface - Kerneloptions: * device en0 * device enp0 * options atm * options NATM - Host IP-Adr. 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 - end-point(routers) IP-Adr. 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 - AAL5 - LLC/SNAP - VPI 0 - VCI 404 (0x194) When BSD boots everything works fine, the ATM-NIC is initialized and the Kernel prints out the right messages. Then I do an ' ifconfig en0 10.1.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 up ' and the Interface is up and has the right IP-address. Next I do a ' route add -iface 10.1.1.1 -link en0:2.0.1.94 " and the route is added which I see with 'netstat -r' But when I try to ping my local interface (10.1.1.2), the following massages appears ' wsww/kernel: atmlookup failed: no llinfo' and then 'ping: sendto: no route to host'. When I try to ping the routers interface(10.1.1.1) the same thing happens (no route to host). It all works fine with Linux, so the problem is neither the router nor the ATM-sneak nor the cables, but the BSD-box. Has anyone a guess what can be wrong ???? Thanks in advance, Kurt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Sep 2 17:12:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from marcos.networkcs.com (marcos.networkcs.com [137.66.16.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3AF14DCF for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 17:12:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mks@us.networkcs.com) Received: from us.networkcs.com (us.networkcs.com [137.66.11.15]) by marcos.networkcs.com (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id TAA14248; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 19:12:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from mks@localhost) by us.networkcs.com (8.9.2/8.8.7) id TAA22491; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 19:12:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Spengler Message-Id: <199909030012.TAA22491@us.networkcs.com> Subject: Re: no ping :-((((( In-Reply-To: <37CE637C.99F34E03@cc.univie.ac.at> from Kurt Bauer at "Sep 2, 99 01:46:04 pm" To: bauer@cc.univie.ac.at (Kurt Bauer) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 19:12:47 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kurt Bauer said: > > [...] > > But when I try to ping my local interface (10.1.1.2), the following > massages appears > ' wsww/kernel: atmlookup failed: no llinfo' and then 'ping: sendto: > no route to host'. When I try to ping the routers interface(10.1.1.1) > the same thing happens (no route to host). > It all works fine with Linux, so the problem is neither the router nor > the ATM-sneak nor the cables, but the BSD-box. > > Has anyone a guess what can be wrong ???? > The output from 'ifconfig -a' and 'netstat -rna' and the terminal output from the ping command (that 'wsww...' message is odd) should help. mike -- Mike Spengler Network Computing Services, Inc. Email: mks@networkcs.com 1200 Washington Ave. So. Phone: +1 612 337 3557 Minneapolis MN 55415 FAX: +1 612 337 3400 (aka Minnesota Supercomputer Center) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Sep 3 11:33:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from inc.net (mailhost.inc.net [204.95.160.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016D815056 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 11:33:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@inc.net) Received: from inc.net (niki.noc.inc.net [204.95.194.201]) by inc.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13548; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:32:03 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37D01560.46216C4B@inc.net> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 13:37:20 -0500 From: Steve Kaczkowski Organization: inc.Net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Bauer Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: no ping :-((((( References: <37CE637C.99F34E03@cc.univie.ac.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kurt Bauer wrote: > > A little Layout-problem in the first try, Sorry ;-))) > > Hi, > > First let me give you a little overview of my configuration: > > - FreeBSD 3.2 > - Efficient Networks ENI155 ATM-Interface > - Kerneloptions: * device en0 > * device enp0 > * options atm > * options NATM > - Host IP-Adr. 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > - end-point(routers) IP-Adr. 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > - AAL5 - LLC/SNAP > - VPI 0 > - VCI 404 (0x194) > > When BSD boots everything works fine, the ATM-NIC is initialized and the > > Kernel prints out the right messages. > Then I do an ' ifconfig en0 10.1.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 up ' and the > Interface is up and has the right IP-address. > Next I do a ' route add -iface 10.1.1.1 -link en0:2.0.1.94 " and the > route is added which I see with 'netstat -r' > But when I try to ping my local interface (10.1.1.2), the following > massages appears > ' wsww/kernel: atmlookup failed: no llinfo' and then 'ping: sendto: > no route to host'. When I try to ping the routers interface(10.1.1.1) > the same thing happens (no route to host). > It all works fine with Linux, so the problem is neither the router nor > the ATM-sneak nor the cables, but the BSD-box. > > Has anyone a guess what can be wrong ???? > I'm using an SMC with the same chipset and it's working great for me. ALthough it looks like you're not using the HARP stuff, here's my kernel config: options ATM_CORE options ATM_IP options ATM_SIGPVC From rc.conf: atm_enable="YES" atm_netif_hea0="atm 1" atm_sigmgr_hea0="sigpvc" ifconfig_atm0="inet 10.1.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1500" network_interfaces="de0 atm0 lo0" Then I add my PVCs in rc.conf.local: atm add pvc hea0 0 33 aal5 snap ip atm0 10.1.1.1 Haven't had any problems with this config, hope it helps! -- Steve Kaczkowski Time Warner Telecom/inc.Net steve@inc.net (414)908-9012 http://www.inc.net (603)737-9209 Fax To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Sep 3 12:48:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from marcos.networkcs.com (marcos.networkcs.com [137.66.16.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD24714BCD for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mks@us.networkcs.com) Received: from us.networkcs.com (us.networkcs.com [137.66.11.15]) by marcos.networkcs.com (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id OAA22735; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 14:47:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from mks@localhost) by us.networkcs.com (8.9.2/8.8.7) id OAA51811; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 14:47:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Spengler Message-Id: <199909031947.OAA51811@us.networkcs.com> Subject: Re: no ping :-((((( In-Reply-To: <37D01560.46216C4B@inc.net> from Steve Kaczkowski at "Sep 3, 99 01:37:20 pm" To: steve@inc.net (Steve Kaczkowski) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 14:47:48 -0500 (CDT) Cc: bauer@cc.univie.ac.at, freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Steve Kaczkowski said: > > I'm using an SMC with the same chipset and it's working great for me. > ALthough it looks like > you're not using the HARP stuff, here's my kernel config: > > options ATM_CORE > options ATM_IP > options ATM_SIGPVC > > >From rc.conf: > atm_enable="YES" > atm_netif_hea0="atm 1" > atm_sigmgr_hea0="sigpvc" > ifconfig_atm0="inet 10.1.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1500" > network_interfaces="de0 atm0 lo0" > > Then I add my PVCs in rc.conf.local: > atm add pvc hea0 0 33 aal5 snap ip atm0 10.1.1.1 > > FYI, you can also specify your PVCs in rc.conf: atm_pvcs="033" atm_pvc_033="hea0 0 33 aal5 snap ip atm0 10.1.1.1" -- Mike Spengler Network Computing Services, Inc. Email: mks@networkcs.com 1200 Washington Ave. So. Phone: +1 612 337 3557 Minneapolis MN 55415 FAX: +1 612 337 3400 (aka Minnesota Supercomputer Center) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Sep 3 14:33:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from aurora.sol.net (aurora.sol.net [206.55.65.76]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54116151FB for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 14:33:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jgreco@aurora.sol.net) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by aurora.sol.net (8.9.2/8.9.2/SNNS-1.02) id QAA64211 for freebsd-atm@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:32:58 -0500 (CDT) From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199909032132.QAA64211@aurora.sol.net> Subject: VPI's other than zero? To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:32:58 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Greetings - Are VPI's other than zero supposed to work? I'm not quite sure what I've done wrong. kernel: options ATM_CORE #core ATM protocol family options ATM_IP #IP over ATM support options ATM_SIGPVC #SIGPVC signalling manager device hfa0 #FORE PCA-200E ATM PCI rc.conf: atm_enable="YES" atm_netif_hfa0="atm 1" # Network interfaces for physical interface. atm_sigmgr_hfa0="sigpvc" # Signalling manager for physical interface. atm_macaddr_hfa0="NO" # Override physical MAC address (or NO). atm_pvcs="test" # Set to PVC list (or leave empty). atm_pvc_test="hfa0 6 32 aal5 snap ip atm0 10.1.1.1" atm_arps="" # Set to permanent ARP list (or leave empty). But: # ifconfig atm0 atm0: flags=43 mtu 9180 inet 10.1.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 ether 00:20:48:40:ce:3e # atm show config Intf Vendor Model Media Bus Serial No hfa0 Fore PCA-200E OC-3c PCI 4247102 MAC address = 00:20:48:40:ce:3e Hardware version = 2.0.1 Firmware version = 4.0.0 # atm show interface Interface Sigmgr State hfa0 SIGPVC ACTIVE ATM address = - Network interfaces: atm0 # atm show netif Net Intf Phy Intf IP Address atm0 hfa0 10.1.1.2 # atm add PVC hfa0 0 33 AAL5 LLC/SNAP IP atm0 10.1.1.1 # atm show VCC Interface VPI VCI AAL Type Dir State Encaps Owner hfa0 0 33 AAL5 PVC InOut ACTIVE LLC/SNAP IP # atm delete PVC hfa0 0 33 # atm add PVC hfa0 6 33 AAL5 LLC/SNAP IP atm0 10.1.1.1 atm: Invalid VPI or VCI value "Huh??" Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? ... Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Greco - Systems Administrator jgreco@ns.sol.net Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/342-4847 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-atm Fri Sep 3 14:47:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from marcos.networkcs.com (marcos.networkcs.com [137.66.16.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A37414BF1 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 14:47:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mks@us.networkcs.com) Received: from us.networkcs.com (us.networkcs.com [137.66.11.15]) by marcos.networkcs.com (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id QAA23779; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:47:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from mks@localhost) by us.networkcs.com (8.9.2/8.8.7) id QAA56057; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:47:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Spengler Message-Id: <199909032147.QAA56057@us.networkcs.com> Subject: Re: VPI's other than zero? In-Reply-To: <199909032132.QAA64211@aurora.sol.net> from Joe Greco at "Sep 3, 99 04:32:58 pm" To: jgreco@ns.sol.net (Joe Greco) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:47:20 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Joe Greco said: > Greetings - > > Are VPI's other than zero supposed to work? > > I'm not quite sure what I've done wrong. > > kernel: > > options ATM_CORE #core ATM protocol family > options ATM_IP #IP over ATM support > options ATM_SIGPVC #SIGPVC signalling manager > device hfa0 #FORE PCA-200E ATM PCI > > rc.conf: > > atm_enable="YES" > atm_netif_hfa0="atm 1" # Network interfaces for physical interface. > atm_sigmgr_hfa0="sigpvc" # Signalling manager for physical interface. > atm_macaddr_hfa0="NO" # Override physical MAC address (or NO). > atm_pvcs="test" # Set to PVC list (or leave empty). > atm_pvc_test="hfa0 6 32 aal5 snap ip atm0 10.1.1.1" > atm_arps="" # Set to permanent ARP list (or leave > empty). > > But: > > # ifconfig atm0 > atm0: flags=43 mtu 9180 > inet 10.1.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 > ether 00:20:48:40:ce:3e > # atm show config > Intf Vendor Model Media Bus Serial No > hfa0 Fore PCA-200E OC-3c PCI 4247102 > MAC address = 00:20:48:40:ce:3e > Hardware version = 2.0.1 > Firmware version = 4.0.0 > # atm show interface > Interface Sigmgr State > hfa0 SIGPVC ACTIVE > ATM address = - > Network interfaces: atm0 > # atm show netif > Net Intf Phy Intf IP Address > atm0 hfa0 10.1.1.2 > # atm add PVC hfa0 0 33 AAL5 LLC/SNAP IP atm0 10.1.1.1 > # atm show VCC > Interface VPI VCI AAL Type Dir State Encaps Owner > hfa0 0 33 AAL5 PVC InOut ACTIVE LLC/SNAP IP > # atm delete PVC hfa0 0 33 > # atm add PVC hfa0 6 33 AAL5 LLC/SNAP IP atm0 10.1.1.1 > atm: Invalid VPI or VCI value > > "Huh??" > > Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? > FORE adapters (or more specifically, the microcode running on the adapter) only support VPI 0. -- Mike Spengler Network Computing Services, Inc. Email: mks@networkcs.com 1200 Washington Ave. So. Phone: +1 612 337 3557 Minneapolis MN 55415 FAX: +1 612 337 3400 (aka Minnesota Supercomputer Center) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message