From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Aug 22 1:30: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F3514F10 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 01:29:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Received: from scones.sup.scc.nl (i454.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.67.175]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA13590; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 10:29:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from scc.nl (scones.sup.scc.nl [192.168.2.4]) by scones.sup.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA43649; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 10:29:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Message-ID: <37BFB4FE.FE460851@scc.nl> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 10:29:50 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: SCC vof X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Masto Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linuxulator on -current now supports RH 6.0 References: <37B6A350.B2DDC02B@scc.nl> <19990821224544.A29421@netmonger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Christopher Masto wrote: > linux_base installs fine, the stuff in /compat/linux/bin all runs > fine, as does WordPerfect. StarOffice 5.1 just dumps core (bus > error). I wiped it out and tried to reinstall.. the setup program > does the same thing. Any ideas? It may be possible that SO 5.1 doesn't work with glibc2.1. This kind of information can best be found on the stardivision and/or redhat sites. If you find anything, let us know. If I had any time left, I would have looked it up myself... -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Aug 22 12:30: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from cheddar.netmonger.net (cheddar.netmonger.net [209.54.21.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33214C7F for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 12:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@cheddar.netmonger.net) Received: (from chris@localhost) by cheddar.netmonger.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA28064; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:28:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19990822152856.A28030@netmonger.net> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:28:56 -0400 From: Christopher Masto To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linuxulator on -current now supports RH 6.0 References: <37B6A350.B2DDC02B@scc.nl> <19990821224544.A29421@netmonger.net> <37BFB4FE.FE460851@scc.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <37BFB4FE.FE460851@scc.nl>; from Marcel Moolenaar on Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 10:29:50AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 10:29:50AM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Christopher Masto wrote: > > > linux_base installs fine, the stuff in /compat/linux/bin all runs > > fine, as does WordPerfect. StarOffice 5.1 just dumps core (bus > > error). I wiped it out and tried to reinstall.. the setup program > > does the same thing. Any ideas? > > It may be possible that SO 5.1 doesn't work with glibc2.1. This kind of > information can best be found on the stardivision and/or redhat sites. If > you find anything, let us know. If I had any time left, I would have looked > it up myself... I looked at that last night and they say specifically that 5.1 does work.. 5.0 did not. -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Aug 22 13:56:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7D4155CC for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:56:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.1/frmug-2.3/nospam) with UUCP id WAA03183 for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 22:56:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id CB187870A; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 22:39:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 22:39:39 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linuxulator on -current now supports RH 6.0 Message-ID: <19990822223939.A11278@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG References: <37B6A350.B2DDC02B@scc.nl> <19990821224544.A29421@netmonger.net> <37BFB4FE.FE460851@scc.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <37BFB4FE.FE460851@scc.nl>; from Marcel Moolenaar on Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 10:29:50AM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF ctm#5543 AMD-K6 MMX @ 200 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Marcel Moolenaar: > It may be possible that SO 5.1 doesn't work with glibc2.1. This kind of > information can best be found on the stardivision and/or redhat sites. If > you find anything, let us know. If I had any time left, I would have looked > it up myself... I'd not be surprised if SO had a problem with glibc 2.1. Everybody in Linux has problems with it, being somewhat incompatible with 2.0 (you'd think they had learned after the a.out->ELF debacle...). BTW Have you verified if SO 5.1 works after the commit you made ? It was mentioned that you omitted part of it and it could cause problems. My CURRENT is not CURRENT enough for me to verify it at the moment. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #73: Sat Jul 31 15:36:05 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Aug 23 0:35:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BC114CAB for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:35:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Received: from scones.sup.scc.nl (i035.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.112.36]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA28689; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:35:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from scc.nl (scones.sup.scc.nl [192.168.2.4]) by scones.sup.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA32567; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:35:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Message-ID: <37C0F9AE.ABCA2A6B@scc.nl> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:35:10 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: SCC vof X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Masto Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linuxulator on -current now supports RH 6.0 References: <37B6A350.B2DDC02B@scc.nl> <19990821224544.A29421@netmonger.net> <37BFB4FE.FE460851@scc.nl> <19990822152856.A28030@netmonger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Christopher Masto wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 10:29:50AM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Christopher Masto wrote: > > > > > linux_base installs fine, the stuff in /compat/linux/bin all runs > > > fine, as does WordPerfect. StarOffice 5.1 just dumps core (bus > > > error). I wiped it out and tried to reinstall.. the setup program > > > does the same thing. Any ideas? > > > > It may be possible that SO 5.1 doesn't work with glibc2.1. This kind of > > information can best be found on the stardivision and/or redhat sites. If > > you find anything, let us know. If I had any time left, I would have looked > > it up myself... > > I looked at that last night and they say specifically that 5.1 does > work.. 5.0 did not. Ok, but do they say anything about RH 6.0? RH 5.2 (possibly also RH 5.1) uses glibc2, whereas RH 6.0 uses glibc2.1. I know numerous applications fail if run with glibc2.1 even though they work fine with glibc2 (fail on RH 6.0 when they work on RH 5.2)... -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Aug 23 1:18:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811F614D8F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 01:18:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA09760 for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:18:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG (emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:18:31 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <37C103D7.D55D6E81@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37B6A350.B2DDC02B@scc.nl>, <19990822223939.A11278@keltia.freenix.fr> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linuxulator on -current now supports RH 6.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ollivier Robert wrote: > BTW Have you verified if SO 5.1 works after the commit you made ? It was > mentioned that you omitted part of it and it could cause problems. My CURRENT > is not CURRENT enough for me to verify it at the moment. You know how it is, people yell first... In short: I didn't omit anything. The patch removed a line which added '\n' to the result. That was the thing people yelled about. It was also in the original patch, but it seems nobody really paid attention to it in the first place :-) jdp verified the behaviour with RH 5.2. There's a really minor difference, but that doesn't break applications that are not already broken. In anyway, yes. I've installed SO 5.1 "out of the box" on -stable. I was surprised to see the same bug in the installer again: you need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH otherwise it can't find a so it just installed... -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Aug 23 10:34:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from cheddar.netmonger.net (cheddar.netmonger.net [209.54.21.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD72114BE3 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:34:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@cheddar.netmonger.net) Received: (from chris@localhost) by cheddar.netmonger.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA17966; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 13:32:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19990823133238.A17773@netmonger.net> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 13:32:38 -0400 From: Christopher Masto To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linuxulator on -current now supports RH 6.0 References: <37B6A350.B2DDC02B@scc.nl> <19990821224544.A29421@netmonger.net> <37BFB4FE.FE460851@scc.nl> <19990822152856.A28030@netmonger.net> <37C0F9AE.ABCA2A6B@scc.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <37C0F9AE.ABCA2A6B@scc.nl>; from Marcel Moolenaar on Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:35:10AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:35:10AM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Christopher Masto wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 10:29:50AM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > Christopher Masto wrote: > > > > > > > linux_base installs fine, the stuff in /compat/linux/bin all runs > > > > fine, as does WordPerfect. StarOffice 5.1 just dumps core (bus > > > > error). I wiped it out and tried to reinstall.. the setup program > > > > does the same thing. Any ideas? > > > > > > It may be possible that SO 5.1 doesn't work with glibc2.1. This kind of > > > information can best be found on the stardivision and/or redhat sites. If > > > you find anything, let us know. If I had any time left, I would have looked > > > it up myself... > > > > I looked at that last night and they say specifically that 5.1 does > > work.. 5.0 did not. > > Ok, but do they say anything about RH 6.0? RH 5.2 (possibly also RH 5.1) > uses glibc2, whereas RH 6.0 uses glibc2.1. I know numerous applications > fail if run with glibc2.1 even though they work fine with glibc2 (fail on > RH 6.0 when they work on RH 5.2)... It could not be much more clear.. http://support.us.stardiv.com/sis/Source/Antwort.asp?ProblemID=2007034&SStichwID=59&SOSLinkID=480&NMin=0 Question Does StarOffice 5.1 works with glibc-2.1? Answer Yes, StarOffice 5.1 works with glibc-2.1 For StarOffice 5.0, the major glibc-2.1 based distributions like RedHat 6.0 and Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 include a special version of StarOffice 5.0, which should work with glibc-2.1 without problems. -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Aug 24 0:22:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BF41585A for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:22:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA05890 for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:07:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG (emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:07:10 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <37C2449E.F0ED1FD7@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37B6A350.B2DDC02B@scc.nl>, <19990823133238.A17773@netmonger.net> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linuxulator on -current now supports RH 6.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Christopher Masto wrote: > > Ok, but do they say anything about RH 6.0? RH 5.2 (possibly also RH 5.1) > > uses glibc2, whereas RH 6.0 uses glibc2.1. I know numerous applications > > fail if run with glibc2.1 even though they work fine with glibc2 (fail on > > RH 6.0 when they work on RH 5.2)... > > Answer > Yes, StarOffice 5.1 works with glibc-2.1 Oracle8i SIGBUSes on me too... hmmm... can you give us the last part of a ktrace? -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Aug 24 6:23:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F02714CA5 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 06:23:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA93030 for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 15:00:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG (emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 15:00:00 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <37C2974F.60536A3C@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SIGBUS for threaded Linux binaries (glibc2.1) [PSL_AC related?] Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I'm having a problem (well, multiple :-), but this one is related to threaded Linux binaries, using glibc2.1 libraries. Let's pick such a binary: StarOffice 5.1 When SO5.1 is run with glibc2, all is fine. But when run with glibc2.1 SO5.1 SIGBUSes. A gdb(1) session reveals that the SIGBUS occurs in pthread_initialize(). A fragment is given below: 0x28118f4b : pushf 0x28118f4c : popl %edx 0x28118f4d : movl %edx,%eax 0x28118f4f : xorl $0x40000,%eax 0x28118f54 : pushl %eax 0x28118f55 : popf 0x28118f56 : pushf 0x28118f57 : popl %eax 0x28118f58 : xorl %edx,%eax 0x28118f5a : andl $0x40000,%eax 0x28118f5f : pushl %edx 0x28118f60 : popf 0x28118f61 : testl %eax,%eax 0x28118f63 : setne %dl gdb(1) tells me: Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error. #0 0x28118f56 in ?? () What this piece of code does (IINM) is toggle the AC (Alignment Check) bit in the flags register and verifies that it has changed and sets %dl to reflect that. From looking at /sys/i386/psl.h I conclude that AC is off by default and that the piece of code sets the bit. The comment in psl.h says: [snip] Changes to PSL_AC are silently ignored on 386's. Which tends me to think that they are not ignored on 486 and up. Am I correct in concluding that changing PSL_AC is responsible for the SIGBUS? [if not, then skip to end of mail] IINM then Linux has PSL_AC set by default (see arch/i386/kernel/vm86.c) for 486 and up. This means that the code fragment given above clears that bit. This doesn't seem to give any problems, because SO5.1 works on Linux (duh :-) Is the SIGBUS avoided if we also have PSL_AC in FreeBSD by default? Are there any reasons why we couldn't set PSL_AC in FreeBSD by default? Thoughts? -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Aug 24 9:54:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from boco.fee.vutbr.cz (boco.fee.vutbr.cz [147.229.9.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B8B150E1 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:52:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12]) by boco.fee.vutbr.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA15897 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 18:52:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA64009 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 18:52:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 18:52:03 +0200 From: Cejka Rudolf To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Solved (Was: running Oracle 8.0.5) Message-ID: <19990824185203.A56005@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz> References: <19990820104732.F602@bnc.net> <37BD2926.6AB82641@scc.nl> <19990820195631.A11687@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: <19990820195631.A11687@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz>; from Cejka Rudolf on Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 07:56:31PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Uff. Now I have solved problems with Oracle 8.0.5 EE on our FreeBSD 3.2 box. Cejka Rudolf wrote (1999/08/20): > I have problems - but in another way: I'm trying to install package > Oracle8051EE_Intel.tgz (all parts except ConText Cartridge) on > system FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE with 128 MB RAM according to > http://www.scc.nl/~marcel/howto-oracle.html - today (99/08/20) I have > repeated all steps (with reinstalling linux_base and linux_devtools) > with modified kernel according to installation suggestions too. > ... > [snip - you can find it in list archive] > ... First of all, I have reported that even with modified kernel according to http://www.scc.nl/~marcel/howto-oracle.html Oracle still complaints about insufficient memory. I'm sorry but it was my big mistake - nothing was modified because I modified lines beginning with #... Grr... At this time Oracle is quite happy about memory. Before installation I had to carry additional steps into operation (two were suggested, one is new): === cd patch bin/genclntsh < #PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin export PATH END patch bin/gensyslib < DFL_SYSLIB="-lstdc++ -lnsl -lm" END patch orainst/rthd.sh < CHOWN=/usr/sbin/chown END === Installation: Source: File Oracle8051EE_Intel.tgz Target: Our FreeBSD 3.2 Some important checkpoints: Custom Install -> Install New Product and Create DB Objects -> All products and all options selected (SQL*Plus Help Facility and Demo Tables, ConText Cartridge demos...). After some time the first error occurs: Missing libclntsh.so.1.0 in $ORACLE_HOME/lib directory during 'Running pupbld.sql' action. This library initially exists, but during "Oracle Intelligent Agent - Relinking Oracle Intelligent Agent executable" action it is deleted (it seems that this action is only first and some subsequent actions would delete libclntsh.so.1.0 too). Never mind, it is easy on another console to run genclntsh under oracle account and go further to second error: Write error while copying Linux documentation. Never mind, just run mkdir -p $ORACLE_HOME/doc/server.805/install an it is all. Installation will proceed to the end without any additional error. Hurray. I didn't need to apply steps "cd ...; make -f ...; cd ...; ar ...; cd ...; make -f ..." from section 3. Steps from 3.1 and 3.2 were applied before installation as you can see above. But it alarms me that ldd doesn't work correctly on my box. Is this typical behavior? Please look: === [oracle@host oracle]$ echo $PATH /compat/linux/bin:/compat/linux/sbin:/compat/linux/usr/bin:/compat/linux/usr/sbin:/home/oracle/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/oracle/app/oracle/product/8.0.5/bin [oracle@host oracle]$ ls -l /bin/ls -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 29308 Aug 6 1998 /bin/ls [oracle@host oracle]$ ldd /bin/ls /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: not found not a dynamic executable [oracle@host oracle]$ ldd /compat/linux/bin/ls /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: not found not a dynamic executable [oracle@host oracle]$ ls -l /lib/ld-linux.so.2 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Aug 24 14:56 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.0.7.so [oracle@host oracle]$ ls -lL /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 160241 Oct 13 1998 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 === Any suggestions? -- Rudolf Cejka (cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz; http://www.fee.vutbr.cz/~cejkar) Brno University of Technology, Faculty of El. Engineering and Comp. Science Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Aug 24 14:22: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B25151A8 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:21:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA08964; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:21:50 +1000 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:21:50 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199908242121.HAA08964@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG, marcel@scc.nl Subject: Re: SIGBUS for threaded Linux binaries (glibc2.1) [PSL_AC related?] Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >When SO5.1 is run with glibc2, all is fine. But when run with glibc2.1 >SO5.1 SIGBUSes. A gdb(1) session reveals that the SIGBUS occurs in >pthread_initialize(). A fragment is given below: > >0x28118f4b : pushf >0x28118f4c : popl %edx >0x28118f4d : movl %edx,%eax >0x28118f4f : xorl $0x40000,%eax >0x28118f54 : pushl %eax >0x28118f55 : popf >0x28118f56 : pushf >... >gdb(1) tells me: >Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error. >#0 0x28118f56 in ?? () This means that the stack is misaligned. This seems to be an emulator bug. The stack is also misaligned for an old version of Linux `cat' when I attach to it while it is waiting for input. BTW, attachment is inconvenient because the FreeBSD gdb looks in the FreeBSD places for the libraries. >What this piece of code does (IINM) is toggle the AC (Alignment Check) bit >in the flags register and verifies that it has changed and sets %dl to >reflect that. Better versions of this code are careful to align the stack before setting the flag, at least if the code is to check for the CPU type and not for alignment errors. Fortunately the code is bad enough to give an early warning for the pessimal stack alignment :-). Alignment checking is almost unusable on i386's since compilers don't support it. E.g., gcc generates a misaligned load and store for: struct { short x; struct { short y[2]; } y; } a, b; ... a.y = b.y; >>From looking at /sys/i386/psl.h I conclude that AC is off by default and >that the piece of code sets the bit. The comment in psl.h says: It is off by default so code like the above struct assignment doesn't fault. > [snip] Changes to PSL_AC are silently ignored on 386's. > >Which tends me to think that they are not ignored on 486 and up. They cause faults for misaligned memory accesses if CR0_AM is set in cr0. FreeBSD sets it and Linux (2.2.9 at least) seems to set it. This gives applications control over their alignement checking. >Am I correct in concluding that changing PSL_AC is responsible for the >SIGBUS? Together with a misaligned stack. Linux (2.2.9 at least) doesn't misalign the stack. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Aug 25 0:28:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0095F15C31 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:22:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA65952 for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 09:19:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG (emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 09:19:16 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <37C398F4.96EE4FE8@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <19990820104732.F602@bnc.net>, <19990824185203.A56005@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz> Subject: Re: Solved (Was: running Oracle 8.0.5) Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Cejka Rudolf wrote: > > Uff. Now I have solved problems with Oracle 8.0.5 EE on our FreeBSD 3.2 box. [big snip] > [oracle@host oracle]$ ls -l /bin/ls > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 29308 Aug 6 1998 /bin/ls > > [oracle@host oracle]$ ldd /bin/ls > /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: not found > not a dynamic executable > > [oracle@host oracle]$ ldd /compat/linux/bin/ls > /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: not found > not a dynamic executable > > [oracle@host oracle]$ ls -l /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Aug 24 14:56 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.0.7.so > > [oracle@host oracle]$ ls -lL /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 160241 Oct 13 1998 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > > Any suggestions? Linux ldd executes /lib/ld-linux.so.2 to do the actual work. But ld-linux.so.2 is no executable ELF wise. This is allowed on Linux but not on FreeBSD. A structural solution is worked on... -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Aug 25 1:46: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7945A14D16 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 01:46:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Received: from scones.sup.scc.nl (i252.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.67.53]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA23214; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:46:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from scc.nl (scones.sup.scc.nl [192.168.2.4]) by scones.sup.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA01041; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:45:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Message-ID: <37C3AD45.3D0B2254@scc.nl> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:45:57 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: SCC vof X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SIGBUS for threaded Linux binaries (glibc2.1) [PSL_AC related?] References: <199908242121.HAA08964@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Bruce Evans wrote: > This means that the stack is misaligned. This seems to be an emulator > bug. The stack is also misaligned for an old version of Linux `cat' > when I attach to it while it is waiting for input. You're right. `linux_sigcode' in linux_locore.s doesn't have the 'right' size. Consequently `linux_szsigcode' is no multiple of 4 which results in a misaligned stack. I'll commit the fix shortly. > BTW, attachment is inconvenient because the FreeBSD gdb looks in the > FreeBSD places for the libraries. That problem also exists when you want to debug a core. I've already roughly implemented a Linux compatible corefile so that you can use a Linux native gdb to do the debugging with... BTW: Thanks for the explanation. It made me look into the right direction! -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Aug 25 10:22: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2C615A2A for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:21:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA25993; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 03:21:24 +1000 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 03:21:24 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199908251721.DAA25993@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, marcel@scc.nl Subject: Re: SIGBUS for threaded Linux binaries (glibc2.1) [PSL_AC related?] Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> This means that the stack is misaligned. This seems to be an emulator >> bug. The stack is also misaligned for an old version of Linux `cat' >> when I attach to it while it is waiting for input. > >You're right. `linux_sigcode' in linux_locore.s doesn't have the 'right' >size. Consequently `linux_szsigcode' is no multiple of 4 which results in a >misaligned stack. I'll commit the fix shortly. This is ELF breakage. I've even noticed the problem before. `.align 2' should be `.p2align 2', or better, ALIGN_TEXT as in locore.s. The committed fix is wrong. `.align 4' gives 16-byte alignment, which is harmless but bogotifies the comment. Why not use the standard macro? There are also broken .align statements in: apic_ipl.s (two .align 2's, one with a comment saying that things MUST be 32-bit aligned) svr4_locore.s (same bugs as in linux_locore.s). There are also dubious .align statements in: alpha/locore.s (.align 3) alpha/prom_disp.s (.align 4) At least the first is apparently a power of 2 aligne statement and should be spelled .p2align. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Aug 25 11:10:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B493814E42 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 11:10:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Received: from scones.sup.scc.nl (i336.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.67.97]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA21700; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 20:10:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from scc.nl (scones.sup.scc.nl [192.168.2.4]) by scones.sup.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA11256; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 20:10:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Message-ID: <37C43182.7CCD1125@scc.nl> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 20:10:10 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: SCC vof X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SIGBUS for threaded Linux binaries (glibc2.1) [PSL_AC related?] References: <199908251721.DAA25993@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Bruce Evans wrote: > >You're right. `linux_sigcode' in linux_locore.s doesn't have the 'right' > >size. Consequently `linux_szsigcode' is no multiple of 4 which results in a > >misaligned stack. I'll commit the fix shortly. > > This is ELF breakage. I've even noticed the problem before. `.align 2' > should be `.p2align 2', or better, ALIGN_TEXT as in locore.s. > > The committed fix is wrong. `.align 4' gives 16-byte alignment, which > is harmless but bogotifies the comment. Why not use the standard macro? I didn't know there were standard macros. I'll change it. BTW: I thought '.p2align 4' gives 16-byte alignment and '.align 4' 4-byte alignment? What's the difference between .p2align and .align then? -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Aug 25 11:40: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3B214C49 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 11:39:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA30500; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 04:39:53 +1000 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 04:39:53 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199908251839.EAA30500@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, marcel@scc.nl Subject: Re: SIGBUS for threaded Linux binaries (glibc2.1) [PSL_AC related?] Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >BTW: I thought '.p2align 4' gives 16-byte alignment and '.align 4' 4-byte >alignment? What's the difference between .p2align and .align then? `.p2align N' gives alignment to 2^N, while `.align N' gives machine-dependent alignment (2^N for i386-aout, N for i386-elf). .p2align was introduced not long ago to reduced the ambiguity. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Aug 25 14:30:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from stargate.datacruz.com (stargate.datacruz.com [208.198.194.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0B314DC8 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:30:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dotcom@datacruz.com) Received: from pacman ([208.198.194.24]) by stargate.datacruz.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-39834U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA5303 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:30:37 -0500 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19990825162833.009572e0@pop.datacruz.com> X-Sender: dotcom@pop.datacruz.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:30:52 -0500 To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: Joshua Stump Subject: half life/tfc server on 3.2-RELEASE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone else come accross this problem with the half life linux server??? when i try to run the server i get this?? -- Attempting to authenticate with WON ./hlds_l: error in loading shared libraries : undefined symbol: __bzero -- any ideas??? ----- Joshua Stump - Datacruz, Inc. dotcom@datacruz.com 219.254.5254 - FAX 219.256.1144 Official Tucows Affiliate - 2500 Miracle Lane, Suite D. PO Box 220 . Mishawaka, IN 46546-0220 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Aug 25 22:59:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ren.detir.qld.gov.au (ns.detir.qld.gov.au [203.46.81.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B743B14C0A for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 22:59:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au) Received: by ren.detir.qld.gov.au; id PAA29969; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:58:31 +1000 (EST) Received: from ogre.detir.qld.gov.au(167.123.8.3) by ren.detir.qld.gov.au via smap (3.2) id xma029906; Thu, 26 Aug 99 15:58:12 +1000 Received: from atlas.detir.qld.gov.au (atlas.detir.qld.gov.au [167.123.8.9]) by ogre.detir.qld.gov.au (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA12736; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:58:12 +1000 (EST) Received: from nymph.detir.qld.gov.au (nymph.detir.qld.gov.au [167.123.10.10]) by atlas.detir.qld.gov.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19201; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:58:11 +1000 (EST) Received: from nymph.detir.qld.gov.au (localhost.detir.qld.gov.au [127.0.0.1]) by nymph.detir.qld.gov.au (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA20245; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:58:10 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from syssgm@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au) Message-Id: <199908260558.PAA20245@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au> To: Joshua Stump Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au Subject: Re: half life/tfc server on 3.2-RELEASE References: <4.2.0.58.19990825162833.009572e0@pop.datacruz.com> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990825162833.009572e0@pop.datacruz.com> from Joshua Stump at "Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:30:52 -0500" Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:58:10 +1000 From: Stephen McKay Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wednesday, 25th August 1999, Joshua Stump wrote: >Has anyone else come accross this problem with the half life linux >server??? when i try to run the server i get this?? > >-- >Attempting to authenticate with WON >./hlds_l: error in loading shared libraries >: undefined symbol: __bzero > >-- >any ideas??? This doesn't help you much but I have successfully run the latest (3.0.1.4) linux half life server under a month old -current. I used the linux lib from the 3.2-R CD. I ran a LAN-only game (ie did not attempt to authenticate with WON). Soon, I'll be doing the same on 3.2-stable, for another LAN party, but again will not be registering with WON. Stephen. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Aug 26 0:54:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA40615422 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:54:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA25870 for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:34:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG (emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:34:50 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <37C4EE1A.85DD15A9@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4.2.0.58.19990825162833.009572e0@pop.datacruz.com> Subject: Re: half life/tfc server on 3.2-RELEASE Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Joshua Stump wrote: > > Has anyone else come accross this problem with the half life linux > server??? when i try to run the server i get this?? > > -- > Attempting to authenticate with WON > ./hlds_l: error in loading shared libraries > : undefined symbol: __bzero > > -- > any ideas??? It probably finds a FreeBSD library before the Linux one. Make sure you: o don't have LD_LIBRARY_PATH messing things up, o have Linux versions of all libraries needed by the binary, o have libraries there where they are expected. Hth, -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Aug 26 2: 6:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98B7153AC for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 02:04:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA31905; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:01:23 +0700 (NSS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:01:23 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon To: Joshua Stump Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: half life/tfc server on 3.2-RELEASE In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990825162833.009572e0@pop.datacruz.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hi, there! On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Joshua Stump wrote: > Has anyone else come accross this problem with the half life linux > server??? when i try to run the server i get this?? > > -- > Attempting to authenticate with WON > ./hlds_l: error in loading shared libraries > : undefined symbol: __bzero > > -- > any ideas??? which version of halflife server do you have? 3.0.1.3 have this problem but 3.0.1.4 does not /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message