From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Dec 13 7:42:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from lilzcvp.liwest.at (lilzcvp.liwest.at [212.33.32.230]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6A9814E60 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 07:42:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from r.haider@liwest.at) Received: from [212.33.32.221] by lilzcvp.relay.liwest.at (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB8573.63.b914fe78) with ESMTP id bbwjaaaa for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 16:42:28 +0000 Received: by OFFICE1_LIWEST with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 16:29:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1F879C64A1A7D211B0F10004AC4C07FC119C9B@OFFICE1_LIWEST> From: Haider Roland To: "'freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org'" Subject: installing on compaq smart array 3200? Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 16:29:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hi, this might be a little bit off topic, but i hope someone here has already done something similar. i'm tryin' to install freebsd on a raid set connected to a compaq smart array 3200. unfortunately this is plugged into an asus p3b-f and not into a compaq machine, so the help i got from them was: nill. thing is it seems i can't run the array configuration utility without the compaq firmware and to use the runtime programm the driver has to be installed. however, to install the driver the array has to be configured... maybee i'm missin' something in the handbook, but at the moment i'm pretty stuck with this. so any ideas are welcome, i just can't buy a proliant or a different controller. cheers, roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Dec 13 9:41:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mailb.telia.com (mailb.telia.com [194.22.194.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD40154B9 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:41:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stefan@syprix.se) Received: from d1o49.telia.com (d1o49.telia.com [195.198.194.241]) by mailb.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA07821; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:41:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from syprix.se (t6o49p13.telia.com [195.198.195.73]) by d1o49.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA18140; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:41:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <385534AC.87C12D25@syprix.se> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:02:20 +0100 From: Stefan Lindgren Reply-To: stefan@syprix.se Organization: Syprix AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Haider Roland Cc: "'freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: installing on compaq smart array 3200? References: <1F879C64A1A7D211B0F10004AC4C07FC119C9B@OFFICE1_LIWEST> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I'm banging my head at moment with Compaq stuff.:| (Even with a Proliant machine) The only thing that I came across was downloadable utilities from their site. BTW I beleive that you have checked this, but is it supported by FreeBSD? /stefan Haider Roland wrote: > > hi, > this might be a little bit off topic, but i hope someone here has > already done something similar. > > i'm tryin' to install freebsd on a raid set connected to a compaq > smart array 3200. > unfortunately this is plugged into an asus p3b-f and not into a compaq > machine, so the help i got from them was: nill. > thing is it seems i can't run the array configuration utility without the > compaq firmware and to use the runtime programm the driver has to > be installed. > however, to install the driver the array has to be configured... > > maybee i'm missin' something in the handbook, but at the moment > i'm pretty stuck with this. > > so any ideas are welcome, i just can't buy a proliant or a different > controller. > > cheers, roland > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Dec 13 12: 9:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webct.com (mail.webct.com [209.87.17.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC26E15141 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 12:09:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dfoo@ca.webct.com) Received: from ca.webct.com (ws74.webct.com [209.87.17.104]) by mail.webct.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA05670; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 12:09:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3855527E.DFDC1E67@ca.webct.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 12:09:34 -0800 From: Darren Foo Reply-To: dfoo@webct.com Organization: WebCT Canada X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stefan@syprix.se Cc: Haider Roland , "'freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: installing on compaq smart array 3200? References: <1F879C64A1A7D211B0F10004AC4C07FC119C9B@OFFICE1_LIWEST> <385534AC.87C12D25@syprix.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I wouldn't expect any help from Compaq... although they do have several FreeBSD Proliants setup for beta testing. I have a SmartArray 2DH card running using the ida.c driver that comes with 3.3. Mark Dawson the original writer of the driver helped me out with getting it setup. Does the 3200 use the same driver? Stefan Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm banging my head at moment with Compaq stuff.:| > (Even with a Proliant machine) > > The only thing that I came across was downloadable utilities from their > site. > > BTW I beleive that you have checked this, but is it supported by > FreeBSD? > > /stefan > > Haider Roland wrote: > > > > hi, > > this might be a little bit off topic, but i hope someone here has > > already done something similar. > > > > i'm tryin' to install freebsd on a raid set connected to a compaq > > smart array 3200. > > unfortunately this is plugged into an asus p3b-f and not into a compaq > > machine, so the help i got from them was: nill. > > thing is it seems i can't run the array configuration utility without the > > compaq firmware and to use the runtime programm the driver has to > > be installed. > > however, to install the driver the array has to be configured... > > > > maybee i'm missin' something in the handbook, but at the moment > > i'm pretty stuck with this. > > > > so any ideas are welcome, i just can't buy a proliant or a different > > controller. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Dec 13 15:25:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from germanium.xtalwind.net (germanium.xtalwind.net [205.160.242.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19BF1521C; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 15:25:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jack@germanium.xtalwind.net) Received: from localhost (jack@localhost) by germanium.xtalwind.net (8.10.0.Beta10/8.10.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id dBDNPYW13355; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:25:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:25:34 -0500 (EST) From: jack To: FreeBSD-hardware@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Digi/Arnet 570i Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If you have experience setting up a 570i (ar(4) driver) please contact me off the list. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jack O'Neill Systems Administrator / Systems Analyst jack@germanium.xtalwind.net Crystal Wind Communications, Inc. Finger jack@germanium.xtalwind.net for my PGP key. PGP Key fingerprint = F6 C4 E6 D4 2F 15 A7 67 FD 09 E9 3C 5F CC EB CD enriched, vcard, HTML messages > /dev/null -------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Dec 13 20:25:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (castles528.castles.com [208.214.165.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25195151E6 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 20:25:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA00586; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 20:28:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199912140428.UAA00586@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: stefan@syprix.se Cc: Haider Roland , "'freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: installing on compaq smart array 3200? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:02:20 +0100." <385534AC.87C12D25@syprix.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 20:28:18 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > this might be a little bit off topic, but i hope someone here has > > already done something similar. > > > > i'm tryin' to install freebsd on a raid set connected to a compaq > > smart array 3200. > > unfortunately this is plugged into an asus p3b-f and not into a compaq > > machine, so the help i got from them was: nill. > > thing is it seems i can't run the array configuration utility without the > > compaq firmware and to use the runtime programm the driver has to > > be installed. > > however, to install the driver the array has to be configured... > > > > maybee i'm missin' something in the handbook, but at the moment > > i'm pretty stuck with this. The Compaq controllers are "captive", ie. they can only be used in a Compaq system. > > so any ideas are welcome, i just can't buy a proliant or a different > > controller. You have no choice - the controller just can't be used in any other system to the best of my knowledge. If you want to install onto a raid array you'll need to pick up a Mylex or AMI controller and move to -current. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 14 14:41:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from admin.us.net (admin.us.net [198.240.72.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941CF14BEA; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 14:41:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stimpy@admin.us.net) Received: from localhost (stimpy@localhost) by admin.us.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA17748; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:41:09 -0500 (EST) X-Provider: US Net - Advanced Internet Services - 301-361-USNET - info@us.net Where Business Connects! (tm) -- http://www.us.net/ Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:41:09 -0500 (EST) From: Brent Scott To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: integrated adaptec AIC-7896 controller w/ 2.2.8 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, (apologies for the cross-posting, I'm not sure which is the best path to follow here) We're trying to build a pair of 2.2.8 servers around Intel L440GX+ Mobos w/ an integrated Adaptec AIC-7896 controller, and we've learned (ack!) that 2.2.8 does not support U2W LVD SCSI natively. It appears we need the CAM drivers. However, since this is a virgin install, we need a bootable floppy that we can use to get the SCSI gear recognized for an install, or some other way to install 2.2.8 from scratch. If someone can schlep a boot image this way that includes CAM support, or if there is a more sane way, please advise. We have some old 1542 cards around but they obviously can't juggle the U2W LVD drives we've got in there, or we'd gen a kernel on that config to get off the ground. We also have a PCI 2940-U2W card we could yank from a server for a few hours if necessary, but we'd prefer not to do that if at all possible. Thanks! Brent Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 14 14:46:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mendota.terracom.net (mendota.terracom.net [208.170.71.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8632D153FC for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 14:46:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gdfriou@terracom.net) Received: from [10.0.0.50] ([208.170.71.143]) by mendota.terracom.net (8.9.1a/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA20495 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:48:45 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:51:18 -0500 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org From: gdfriou@terracom.net (George Friou) Subject: unsubscirbe Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------ George D. Friou TerraCom, Inc. gdfriou@terracom.net Data Communications & Internet Access (608) 250-4444 http://www.terracom.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 14 15:10:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A75815119; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ken@panzer.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.kdm.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id QAA42889; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:09:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:09:19 -0700 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: Brent Scott Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: integrated adaptec AIC-7896 controller w/ 2.2.8 Message-ID: <19991214160919.A42799@panzer.kdm.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from stimpy@admin.us.net on Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 05:41:09PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 17:41:09 -0500, Brent Scott wrote: > (apologies for the cross-posting, I'm not sure which is the best path to follow here) > > We're trying to build a pair of 2.2.8 servers around Intel L440GX+ Mobos > w/ an integrated Adaptec AIC-7896 controller, and we've learned (ack!) > that 2.2.8 does not support U2W LVD SCSI natively. It appears we need the > CAM drivers. However, since this is a virgin install, we need a bootable > floppy that we can use to get the SCSI gear recognized for an install, or > some other way to install 2.2.8 from scratch. If someone can schlep a > boot image this way that includes CAM support, or if there is a more sane > way, please advise. There is a CAM-modified FreeBSD snapshot from around FreeBSD 2.2.7 here: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/development/cam I'm not sure, however, that it supports the 7896. It might. There are also diffs in that directory that you can apply against 2.2.x for CAM support. They'll probably need tweaking to work completely. Keep in mind that that version of CAM is fairly old at this point (it is mid-1998 vintage), and is missing a lot of bug-fixes that have gone into the tree since then. I would recommend against using a CAM-modified 2.2.x if you can get around it at all. It really would be much easier to just use a newer release. FreeBSD 3.3 supports your hardware, although -stable has some important bugfixes for the 7896/7 boards. You can get a FreeBSD 3.3-stable snapshot here: ftp://current.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386 Those snapshots represent what will be (tomorrow, I think) FreeBSD 3.4. > We have some old 1542 cards around but they obviously can't juggle the U2W > LVD drives we've got in there, or we'd gen a kernel on that config to get > off the ground. We also have a PCI 2940-U2W card we could yank from a > server for a few hours if necessary, but we'd prefer not to do that if at > all possible. Well, you can use LVD drives with 1542 controllers. The LVD disks will negotiate down to fast narrow SCSI. Keep in mind that LVD disks don't have terminators, so you will need external terminators for them. The 2940U2W uses an Adaptec 7890, which is also only supported in CAM. So that won't help you any. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 14 15:49:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.213.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A3F14E8C; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:49:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11xzAm-0002DB-00; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 13:07:52 -0800 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 13:07:51 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: Brent Scott Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: integrated adaptec AIC-7896 controller w/ 2.2.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Brent Scott wrote: > Hello, > > (apologies for the cross-posting, I'm not sure which is the best path to follow here) > > We're trying to build a pair of 2.2.8 servers around Intel L440GX+ Mobos > w/ an integrated Adaptec AIC-7896 controller, and we've learned (ack!) > that 2.2.8 does not support U2W LVD SCSI natively. It appears we need the Use 3.3 instead? 2.2.8 is being mantained yet, but nothing new is being added, so don't hold your breath for support. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 14 16:47:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (mass.cdrom.com [204.216.28.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E0814E6C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:47:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA04613; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:48:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199912150048.QAA04613@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Brent Scott Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: integrated adaptec AIC-7896 controller w/ 2.2.8 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:41:09 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:48:52 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > (apologies for the cross-posting, I'm not sure which is the best path to follow here) -hardware > We're trying to build a pair of 2.2.8 servers around Intel L440GX+ Mobos > w/ an integrated Adaptec AIC-7896 controller, and we've learned (ack!) > that 2.2.8 does not support U2W LVD SCSI natively. Actually, that's not really correct; there's no system support required for U2W/LVD. More accurately, there is little driver support for U2W/LVD adapters in 2.2.8. > It appears we need the > CAM drivers. However, since this is a virgin install, we need a bootable > floppy that we can use to get the SCSI gear recognized for an install, or > some other way to install 2.2.8 from scratch. If someone can schlep a > boot image this way that includes CAM support, or if there is a more sane > way, please advise. Use FreeBSD 3.3. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 14 17:49:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from admin.us.net (admin.us.net [198.240.72.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4862A15125; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:49:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stimpy@admin.us.net) Received: from localhost (stimpy@localhost) by admin.us.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA21056; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:49:09 -0500 (EST) X-Provider: US Net - Advanced Internet Services - 301-361-USNET - info@us.net Where Business Connects! (tm) -- http://www.us.net/ Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:49:08 -0500 (EST) From: Brent Scott To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: thanks. Was: integrated adaptec AIC-7896 controller w/ 2.2.8 In-Reply-To: <199912150048.QAA04613@mass.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thanks for the advice so far. We're going to make the leap and jump for 3.3 (or the rumored 3.4 due any hour). We've been tied to the 2.2.x tree for a long time, so we were reluctant to move to the next era. This looks like the kind of situation that would warrant going for it. Brent Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 14 23:11:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mojave.worldwide.lemis.com (mojave.lemis.com [192.109.197.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9EC1533D for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 23:11:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by mojave.worldwide.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA00526; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:09:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:09:22 -0800 From: Greg Lehey To: Richard Furda Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, Steve Gerakines Subject: Re: QIC 40/80 floppy tape drive controller Message-ID: <19991213190922.F358@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> Reply-To: Greg Lehey References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from riso@best.ca on Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 01:50:46PM -0800 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Saturday, 11 December 1999 at 13:50:46 -0800, Richard Furda wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a QIC 40/80 clone floppy tape drive controller (running > 3.3-stable) and wondering if anyone is working/thinking about porting the > ft driver to 3.X/4.X branch. I understand the driver was "removed" > in 2.2.8 due to incompatibility issues. I'd like to help out, thus give > access to a machine with the QIC 40/80 floppy tape controller. I think one of the reasons this driver died was due to severe performance limitations and lack of love. If you can get it to work acceptably under -CURRENT, I'm sure we'll find a way of getting it back into the tree. But you may find better things to do with your time. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 9:31:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mail.inr.net (mail.inr.net [198.77.208.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C43154F5 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:31:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mylists@inr.net) Received: from wakko (wakko.inr.net [198.77.208.4]) by mail.inr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA85431 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:31:41 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19991215123139.00984100@mail.inr.net> X-Sender: mylists@mail.inr.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:31:39 -0500 To: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG From: "N.B. DelMore" Subject: Recommended Hardware Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I need to build two new mail servers and am seeking feedback as to recommended hardware, in particular, compatible motherboards. As I see it I have two choices, Pentium III 500 and the new AMD Athelon, I have always used AMD in the past but have had repeated problems with their 450 MHz K6 processors which I clocked down in order to gain stability. Our (now) typical mail server uses AMD K6 300 - 400 CPUS, 256 MB RAM, single SCSI LVD boot drive, Adaptec 2940U2W and is NFS mounted to our RAID arrays where mail is spooled/delivered. Your input is appreciated. Thank you. Noel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 10: 1:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6562515541 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:01:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA77116 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:01:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA61965 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:01:16 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199912151801.LAA61965@harmony.village.org> To: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Sweet spot Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:01:16 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What's the current sweet spot for intel systems? I'm looking to spend about $1500-$2000 on a screaming builder box and was wondering what the current sweet spot in the hardware curve is?? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 10:21:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60FA150D4 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:21:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA11219; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 19:21:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Warner Losh Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sweet spot In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:01:16 MST." <199912151801.LAA61965@harmony.village.org> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 19:21:32 +0100 Message-ID: <11217.945282092@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199912151801.LAA61965@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: > >What's the current sweet spot for intel systems? I'm looking to spend >about $1500-$2000 on a screaming builder box and was wondering what >the current sweet spot in the hardware curve is?? Go for an Athlon and overclock it. My 500MHz is a happy camper at 700MHz (The chip is marked 600MHz btw). -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 10:28:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from sandcastle.ny.ans.net (sandcastle.ny.ans.net [147.225.51.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D991539D for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:28:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doherty@ans.net) Received: from localhost (doherty@localhost) by sandcastle.ny.ans.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA21459; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:28:19 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: sandcastle.ny.ans.net: doherty owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:28:18 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Doherty X-Sender: doherty@sandcastle.ny.ans.net To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Warner Losh , hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sweet spot In-Reply-To: <11217.945282092@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <199912151801.LAA61965@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: > > > >What's the current sweet spot for intel systems? I'm looking to spend > >about $1500-$2000 on a screaming builder box and was wondering what > >the current sweet spot in the hardware curve is?? > > Go for an Athlon and overclock it. My 500MHz is a happy camper at > 700MHz (The chip is marked 600MHz btw). I just built an inexpensive multi-media system for my kids and found that an equivilent Intel Pentium III system to be about $150.00 cheaper than an Athlon. The motherboards are more expensive and the vendors at the computer fair were not pushing Athlon at all. I wanted to buy an Athlon but could not see paying a premium for it. Jim Doherty > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member > phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." > FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 10:50:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AAE1556A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:50:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA77336; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:50:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA62583; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:50:03 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199912151850.LAA62583@harmony.village.org> To: Jim Doherty Subject: Re: Sweet spot Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:28:18 EST." References: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:50:03 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org speaking of prices, all my good sources for hw have blown away. Can anybody recommend a good supplier? I've been mondo happy with my ASUS P2B-LS mobo at work with its "mere" P3-450 and was wanting something similar for home use. I was also considering their MP boxes as well and going a dual 500 route with the asus p2b-ds. At the chip merchant's new site the cpu + mobo would be $251*2+$454, or just unnder $1k. Top it off with a case, dvd drive, ibm ultrastar 18G scsi and 256M of memory and still come in under $2k ($1958 if my math is good). Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 11:20:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mario.zyan.com (mario.zyan.com [209.250.96.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3E4152EE for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:20:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from irc@ex-pressnet.com) Received: from micron ([208.41.125.162]) by mario.zyan.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA98695 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:20:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from irc@ex-pressnet.com) Message-ID: <007401bf474a$730199e0$a27d29d0@sexpics.net> From: "EX-PRESSNET2" To: Subject: ULTRA160 SCSI Controller Card Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:19:25 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0071_01BF4707.63DAF3A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01BF4707.63DAF3A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was wondering if the Latest ver. of FreeBSD or FBSD 4.0 will support = the Ultra160 SCSI Feature which delivers 160 Mbyte/sec transfer rates. Adaptec makes an Ultra160 PCI-to-Ultra2 SCSI Host Adapter (AHA-3950U2).=20 Is this card compatible with FBSD or will it be? Thanks. ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01BF4707.63DAF3A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I was wondering if the Latest ver. of = FreeBSD or=20 FBSD 4.0 will support the Ultra160 SCSI Feature which delivers 160 = Mbyte/sec=20 transfer rates.
 
Adaptec makes an Ultra160 PCI-to-Ultra2 SCSI Host Adapter (AHA-3950U2). =
Is this card = compatible with FBSD=20 or will it be?
 
Thanks.
 

 
 
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0071_01BF4707.63DAF3A0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 11:39: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844E7155AF for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:38:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA21647; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:40:34 -0800 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:40:34 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: EX-PRESSNET2 Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ULTRA160 SCSI Controller Card In-Reply-To: <007401bf474a$730199e0$a27d29d0@sexpics.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, EX-PRESSNET2 wrote: > I was wondering if the Latest ver. of FreeBSD or FBSD 4.0 will support > the Ultra160 SCSI Feature which delivers 160 Mbyte/sec transfer rates. Maybe Gerard's sym driver already supports the NCR/LSI-Logic version. I supposedly will get Qlogic 12160A cards in January- their Ultra3 support should happen then. > > Adaptec makes an Ultra160 PCI-to-Ultra2 SCSI Host Adapter (AHA-3950U2). > Is this card compatible with FBSD or will it be? Justin will say. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 12:35:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0D41553B for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:35:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ken@panzer.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.kdm.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA06433; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:35:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:35:43 -0700 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: EX-PRESSNET2 Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ULTRA160 SCSI Controller Card Message-ID: <19991215133543.A6380@panzer.kdm.org> References: <007401bf474a$730199e0$a27d29d0@sexpics.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <007401bf474a$730199e0$a27d29d0@sexpics.net>; from irc@ex-pressnet.com on Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 02:19:25PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 14:19:25 -0800, EX-PRESSNET2 wrote: > I was wondering if the Latest ver. of FreeBSD or FBSD 4.0 will support the Ultra160 SCSI Feature which delivers 160 Mbyte/sec transfer rates. > You have to have hardware that supports it. I don't think any of the drivers in the tree support Ultra160 yet. Justin is working on support for the Adaptec driver, and Gerard Roudier is working on support for his Symbios driver. From Matt's message, it looks like he is working on support for QLogic's Ultra160 boards. As for whether FreeBSD 4.0 will have support for those boards, that probably depends on when 4.0 is released. My guess is that all three (Symbios, Adaptec and Qlogic) will probably be supported, but there are no guarantees of course. > Adaptec makes an Ultra160 PCI-to-Ultra2 SCSI Host Adapter (AHA-3950U2). > Is this card compatible with FBSD or will it be? The 3950U2 is not an Ultra160 board. It is a dual channel Ultra2 board. And yes, it does work with FreeBSD. I've got one, in fact: ahc0: irq 12 at device 10.0 on pci0 ahc0: aic7896/97 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs ahc1: irq 12 at device 10.1 on pci0 ahc1: aic7896/97 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 14:19:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (mass.cdrom.com [204.216.28.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9522115063 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:19:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01491; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:23:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199912152223.OAA01491@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Warner Losh Cc: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sweet spot In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:01:16 MST." <199912151801.LAA61965@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:23:00 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > What's the current sweet spot for intel systems? I'm looking to spend > about $1500-$2000 on a screaming builder box and was wondering what > the current sweet spot in the hardware curve is?? Probably an ABIT BP6 and two 400MHz celerons. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 17: 1:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de (mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de [139.13.25.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC6B15280 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 17:01:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Inferno@nightfire.de) Received: from fettesau.stuwo.fh-wilhelmshaven.de (stuwopc5.stuwo.fh-wilhelmshaven.de [139.13.209.5]) by mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA04997; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 02:01:07 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <4.1.19991216002021.00c2cee0@mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de> X-Sender: Inferno@nightfire.de@post.strato.de (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:41:57 +0100 To: "N.B. DelMore" From: Olaf Hoyer Subject: Re: Recommended Hardware Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19991215123139.00984100@mail.inr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:31 15.12.99 -0500, you wrote: >I need to build two new mail servers and am seeking feedback as to >recommended hardware, in particular, compatible motherboards. > >As I see it I have two choices, Pentium III 500 and the new AMD Athelon, I >have always used AMD in the past but have had repeated problems with their >450 MHz K6 processors which I clocked down in order to gain stability. > >Our (now) typical mail server uses AMD K6 300 - 400 CPUS, 256 MB RAM, >single SCSI LVD boot drive, Adaptec 2940U2W and is NFS mounted to our RAID >arrays where mail is spooled/delivered. Hi! First question is: Does the mail server app/demon take advantage of dual CPU config? If so, you can therefore use cheaper CPUs and upgrade later easily... OK, for a single CPU config I'd use nowadays an AMD Athlon with 600 MHZ (most bang for buck), preferrably on the ASUS K7M, which is really cool. There have been reports of AMD's new stepping of their chipset, question is , when will it be available. (Fester, I think they call that board). Brings a real performance gain. RAM of course as much as possible, where I'd prefer standard PC 100/133 from a good manufacturer, such as micron, corsair etc... The extended costs of RAMBUS will not bring a corresponding increase in speed... HDD subsystem: OK, here it is the question how many users with which volume it shall serve, and inhowfar the mail server app takes advantage of the memory as a cache, or do every mail has to be written (for security purposes) directly to HDD? If it has a low volume to handle, any good IDE drive (like IBM, or Quantum) should do the job. Especially the answer times of IDE drives are a bit better than that of SCSI. (In -Chat there is curently a discussion raging which RAID/HDD subsystem is best) For medium stress, I'd take some good SCSI drives, like IBM DDRS/DRVS or Quantum Atlas, and hook them up to a single controller, configured in a way that swap goes to multiple drives. (If ya really crazy, take two SCSI controllers to have more bandwidth) Also the drives where mail data will be stored and the logging files will reside, should be different. For more stress, and data security, a RAID solution is recommended. Take a look at -Chat, there they offer some IDE RAIDs, which also look pretty good. For "standard and old-fashoined" RAIDs, one would take a good SCSI-controller, hook up some 10000 rpm SCSI drives, and do a corresponding config. Ok, all other components are obvious: Good server casing, best with redundant Power supply, metal HDD frames with cooling, el cheapo Vid card from a quality manufacturer (image is not important, but it mustn't fail) You also should take a look at Tyan, they offer with the Thunder series some excellent boards designated for small/medium servers. They have the BX/GX chipsets, (up to 2 GB RAM), dual PIII capable, Adaptec RAID capable controller (the 3940, I think,with additional card) onboard, as well as lots of slots... Others have a U2W onboard...=20 Have an old Tomcat myself, and I'm very content with the mechanical/electrical stability of it, and with some details of the design. Here in Germany the biggest costs about US$ 800 (1500 DM) Regards Olaf Hoyer=20 ------ Olaf Hoyer ICQ: 22838075 mailto: Olaf.Hoyer@nightfire.de home: www.nightfire.de (The home of the burning CPU) Death be my master, my soul and saviour... (The book of inferno, chapter II) "There is no justice, there is just me", said the Reaper (Terry Pratchett) Wer mit Ungeheuern k=E4mpft, mag zusehn,=20 da=DF er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund=20 auch in dich hinein. (Friedrich Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und B=F6se) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 18:45: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.ocsny.com (apollo.ocsny.com [204.107.76.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF93814ECD for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 18:44:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikel@ocsny.com) Received: from localhost (mikel@localhost) by apollo.ocsny.com (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA55228 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 21:43:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 21:43:27 -0500 (EST) From: Mikel To: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Recommended Hardware In-Reply-To: <4.1.19991216002021.00c2cee0@mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have a couple of AMD k6450's right now and all of them are pretty stable...but it took some kernel tweaking to get them right...My first attempt using a minimal conf...yeilded some pretty flaky results...finally I beefed up my conf and thing are aok. On a side note: I've two sister machines...both are dual pii400's (Asus mlb's) one is 1/2 gb ram, the other is 390Mish...both have 10k rpm drives and uw3 dual channel cntrlrs..alas for some readon we are only using one channel right now..both also have 12/24 dds3 tapes..absolutely essential in my book...When I started at this place they had two drive among something like 20 srvrs...now we've scalled down and put a drive in almost every srvr...believe me it took one crash for them to see that light...;) both machines have 400-500 users...and are only pulling 3-7% of cpu cycles max....added DNS (on both) and Apache on one...(still below 15% duty) The Apache is a bit higher but only during pek hits.. hope that helps... Cheers, mikel On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Olaf Hoyer wrote: > At 12:31 15.12.99 -0500, you wrote: > >I need to build two new mail servers and am seeking feedback as to > >recommended hardware, in particular, compatible motherboards. > > > >As I see it I have two choices, Pentium III 500 and the new AMD Athelon,= I > >have always used AMD in the past but have had repeated problems with the= ir > >450 MHz K6 processors which I clocked down in order to gain stability. > > > >Our (now) typical mail server uses AMD K6 300 - 400 CPUS, 256 MB RAM, > >single SCSI LVD boot drive, Adaptec 2940U2W and is NFS mounted to our RA= ID > >arrays where mail is spooled/delivered. > Hi! >=20 > First question is: Does the mail server app/demon take advantage of dual > CPU config? > If so, you can therefore use cheaper CPUs and upgrade later easily... >=20 > OK, for a single CPU config I'd use nowadays an AMD Athlon with 600 MHZ > (most bang for buck), preferrably on the ASUS K7M, which is really cool. > There have been reports of AMD's new stepping of their chipset, question = is > , when will it be available. (Fester, I think they call that board). Brin= gs > a real performance gain. >=20 > RAM of course as much as possible, where I'd prefer standard PC 100/133 > from a good manufacturer, such as micron, corsair etc... >=20 > The extended costs of RAMBUS will not bring a corresponding increase in > speed... >=20 > HDD subsystem: OK, here it is the question how many users with which volu= me > it shall serve, and inhowfar the mail server app takes advantage of the > memory as a cache, or do every mail has to be written (for security > purposes) directly to HDD? >=20 > If it has a low volume to handle, any good IDE drive (like IBM, or Quantu= m) > should do the job. Especially the answer times of IDE drives are a bit > better than that of SCSI. >=20 > (In -Chat there is curently a discussion raging which RAID/HDD subsystem = is > best) >=20 > For medium stress, I'd take some good SCSI drives, like IBM DDRS/DRVS or > Quantum Atlas, and hook them up to a single controller, configured in a w= ay > that swap goes to multiple drives. (If ya really crazy, take two SCSI > controllers to have more bandwidth) > Also the drives where mail data will be stored and the logging files will > reside, should be different. >=20 > For more stress, and data security, a RAID solution is recommended. Take = a > look at -Chat, there they offer some IDE RAIDs, which also look pretty go= od. >=20 > For "standard and old-fashoined" RAIDs, one would take a good > SCSI-controller, hook up some 10000 rpm SCSI drives, and do a correspondi= ng > config. >=20 > Ok, all other components are obvious: Good server casing, best with > redundant Power supply, metal HDD frames with cooling, el cheapo Vid car= d > from a quality manufacturer (image is not important, but it mustn't fail) >=20 > You also should take a look at Tyan, they offer with the Thunder series > some excellent boards designated for small/medium servers. >=20 > They have the BX/GX chipsets, (up to 2 GB RAM), dual PIII capable, Adapte= c > RAID capable controller (the 3940, I think,with additional card) onboard, > as well as lots of slots... > Others have a U2W onboard...=20 > Have an old Tomcat myself, and I'm very content with the > mechanical/electrical stability of it, and with some details of the desig= n. >=20 > Here in Germany the biggest costs about US$ 800 (1500 DM) >=20 > Regards > Olaf Hoyer=20 > ------ > Olaf Hoyer ICQ: 22838075 mailto: Olaf.Hoyer@nightfire.de > home: www.nightfire.de (The home of the burning CPU) >=20 > Death be my master, my soul and saviour... (The book of inferno, chapter = II) > "There is no justice, there is just me", said the Reaper (Terry Pratchett= ) >=20 > Wer mit Ungeheuern k=E4mpft, mag zusehn,=20 > da=DF er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. > Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund=20 > auch in dich hinein. > (Friedrich Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und B=F6se) >=20 >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 19:12:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from lh2.rdc1.bc.home.com (ha2.rdc1.bc.wave.home.com [24.2.10.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C401529A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 19:12:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from schan_ca@geocities.com) Received: from geocities.com ([24.113.221.147]) by lh2.rdc1.bc.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP id <19991216031228.NKDS19112.lh2.rdc1.bc.home.com@geocities.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 19:12:28 -0800 Message-ID: <38585C01.CE3D4207@geocities.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 19:26:57 -0800 From: stephen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.6 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikel Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Recommended Hardware References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello Mikel: Care to describe your AMD systems and how you tweaked them? Regards Stephen ================================================== Mikel wrote: > I have a couple of AMD k6450's right now and all of them are pretty > stable...but it took some kernel tweaking to get them right...My first > attempt using a minimal conf...yeilded some pretty flaky results...finally > I beefed up my conf and thing are aok. > > On a side note: I've two sister machines...both are dual pii400's (Asus > mlb's) one is 1/2 gb ram, the other is 390Mish...both have 10k rpm drives > and uw3 dual channel cntrlrs..alas for some readon we are only using one > channel right now..both also have 12/24 dds3 tapes..absolutely essential > in my book...When I started at this place they had two drive among > something like 20 srvrs...now we've scalled down and put a drive in almost > every srvr...believe me it took one crash for them to see that light...;) > > both machines have 400-500 users...and are only pulling 3-7% of cpu cycles > max....added DNS (on both) and Apache on one...(still below 15% duty) The > Apache is a bit higher but only during pek hits.. > > hope that helps... > > Cheers, > mikel > > On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Olaf Hoyer wrote: > > > At 12:31 15.12.99 -0500, you wrote: > > >I need to build two new mail servers and am seeking feedback as to > > >recommended hardware, in particular, compatible motherboards. > > > > > >As I see it I have two choices, Pentium III 500 and the new AMD Athelon, I > > >have always used AMD in the past but have had repeated problems with their > > >450 MHz K6 processors which I clocked down in order to gain stability. > > > > > >Our (now) typical mail server uses AMD K6 300 - 400 CPUS, 256 MB RAM, > > >single SCSI LVD boot drive, Adaptec 2940U2W and is NFS mounted to our RAID > > >arrays where mail is spooled/delivered. > > Hi! > > > > First question is: Does the mail server app/demon take advantage of dual > > CPU config? > > If so, you can therefore use cheaper CPUs and upgrade later easily... > > > > OK, for a single CPU config I'd use nowadays an AMD Athlon with 600 MHZ > > (most bang for buck), preferrably on the ASUS K7M, which is really cool. > > There have been reports of AMD's new stepping of their chipset, question is > > , when will it be available. (Fester, I think they call that board). Brings > > a real performance gain. > > > > RAM of course as much as possible, where I'd prefer standard PC 100/133 > > from a good manufacturer, such as micron, corsair etc... > > > > The extended costs of RAMBUS will not bring a corresponding increase in > > speed... > > > > HDD subsystem: OK, here it is the question how many users with which volume > > it shall serve, and inhowfar the mail server app takes advantage of the > > memory as a cache, or do every mail has to be written (for security > > purposes) directly to HDD? > > > > If it has a low volume to handle, any good IDE drive (like IBM, or Quantum) > > should do the job. Especially the answer times of IDE drives are a bit > > better than that of SCSI. > > > > (In -Chat there is curently a discussion raging which RAID/HDD subsystem is > > best) > > > > For medium stress, I'd take some good SCSI drives, like IBM DDRS/DRVS or > > Quantum Atlas, and hook them up to a single controller, configured in a way > > that swap goes to multiple drives. (If ya really crazy, take two SCSI > > controllers to have more bandwidth) > > Also the drives where mail data will be stored and the logging files will > > reside, should be different. > > > > For more stress, and data security, a RAID solution is recommended. Take a > > look at -Chat, there they offer some IDE RAIDs, which also look pretty good. > > > > For "standard and old-fashoined" RAIDs, one would take a good > > SCSI-controller, hook up some 10000 rpm SCSI drives, and do a corresponding > > config. > > > > Ok, all other components are obvious: Good server casing, best with > > redundant Power supply, metal HDD frames with cooling, el cheapo Vid card > > from a quality manufacturer (image is not important, but it mustn't fail) > > > > You also should take a look at Tyan, they offer with the Thunder series > > some excellent boards designated for small/medium servers. > > > > They have the BX/GX chipsets, (up to 2 GB RAM), dual PIII capable, Adaptec > > RAID capable controller (the 3940, I think,with additional card) onboard, > > as well as lots of slots... > > Others have a U2W onboard... > > Have an old Tomcat myself, and I'm very content with the > > mechanical/electrical stability of it, and with some details of the design. > > > > Here in Germany the biggest costs about US$ 800 (1500 DM) > > > > Regards > > Olaf Hoyer > > ------ > > Olaf Hoyer ICQ: 22838075 mailto: Olaf.Hoyer@nightfire.de > > home: www.nightfire.de (The home of the burning CPU) > > > > Death be my master, my soul and saviour... (The book of inferno, chapter II) > > "There is no justice, there is just me", said the Reaper (Terry Pratchett) > > > > Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, > > daß er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. > > Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund > > auch in dich hinein. > > (Friedrich Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Böse) > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 20:22:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from dns.sonntag.org (dns.sonntag.org [216.140.186.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E6215392 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:22:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) Received: from aaron (cs2744-250.austin.rr.com [24.27.44.250]) by dns.sonntag.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA30924 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:22:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) From: "Aaron Sonntag" To: Subject: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:21:22 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <38585C01.CE3D4207@geocities.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am looking at getting my hands on a couple of Dell PowerEdge 4300 servers. In both of these boxes I must spec a hardware RAID controller. I basically have two choices. First is a multi-channel controller that has the Adaptec 7897 chipset. It is a 4 channel controller. http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/obsidian/specs.htm The second is an American Megatrends based controller. It is only 1 channel. http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/perc2sc/specs.htm I have read conflicting statements in the list archives about whether I can make these puppies run. Can I get either one of these to work without much rigging? If both can be used... which one is better/easier and more likely to work well? On a completely separate note... anybody have opinions on the best high end video card for x-windows? Thank you! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 15 20:42: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de (mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de [139.13.25.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F072415003 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:42:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ohoyer@fbwi.fh-wilhelmshaven.de) Received: from fettesau.stuwo.fh-wilhelmshaven.de (stuwopc5.stuwo.fh-wilhelmshaven.de [139.13.209.5]) by mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA08320; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 05:40:46 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <4.1.19991216053232.00c00c20@mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de> X-Sender: ohoyer@mail.rz.fh-wilhelmshaven.de X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 05:38:18 +0100 To: "Aaron Sonntag" From: Olaf Hoyer Subject: Re: Hardware for X-Windows Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <38585C01.CE3D4207@geocities.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >On a completely separate note... >anybody have opinions on the best high end video card for x-windows? >Thank you! Hi! For normal 2D/3D operation, you should have a look at the TNT2 cards, like the Viper 770 or ELSA Erazor III series. Chap got a V770 running under Linux with a 19" screen. He had a SUSE 6.2 Linux, the card was already pre-set for X-Windows. There he only needed to copy the 3D-files manually. Other good solution is the G400 from Matrox. Real screamer, good picture quality, and capable of 2 vid outs. Question is the X-Server support... Have seen it only under Win95, and there it really rocked. But as all those Linux ppl will work on it, there should be a solution soon.=20 For special apps like CAD you will want to look at special CAD boards or similar... Hands off from those Voodoo3 and GeForce cards... They draw much too much power, thus overheating power regulators... Regards Olaf Hoyer - - - - - - - -=20 Olaf Hoyer ICQ: 22838075 mailto: Olaf.Hoyer@nightfire.de home: www.nightfire.de (The home of the burning CPU) Wer mit Ungeheuern k=E4mpft, mag zusehn,=20 da=DF er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund=20 auch in dich hinein. (Friedrich Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und B=F6se) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 16 4:56:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mail-out.visi.com (kauket.visi.com [209.98.98.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2B014F20; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 04:56:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mestery@visi.com) Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by mail-out.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B11378A; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 06:52:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (mestery@localhost) by isis.visi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA29930; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 06:52:46 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: isis.visi.com: mestery owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 06:52:46 -0600 (CST) From: To: Mike Smith Cc: Warner Losh , hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sweet spot In-Reply-To: <199912152223.OAA01491@mass.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > What's the current sweet spot for intel systems? I'm looking to spend > > about $1500-$2000 on a screaming builder box and was wondering what > > the current sweet spot in the hardware curve is?? > > Probably an ABIT BP6 and two 400MHz celerons. > I can second that. I have that exact configuration (with a Tekram DC-390F using the sym driver) and it works extremely well. It's also much cheaper than a dual PIII system and for normal home use and building, it runs fine. I even use it to play QuakeII/III with my G400! -- Kyle Mestery | Ancor Communications mestery@visi.com | http://www.freebsd.org/ mestery@netwinder.org | http://www.netwinder.org/ Protect your right to privacy: www.freecrypto.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 16 11:53:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from dns.sonntag.org (dns.sonntag.org [216.140.186.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4EB15645 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 11:53:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) Received: from WIN2K1 (st84042.nobell.com [216.140.184.42]) by dns.sonntag.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA35110 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:53:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) From: "Aaron Sonntag" To: Subject: SCSI RAID Controller support? Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:54:05 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.5600 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am looking at getting my hands on a couple of Dell PowerEdge 4300 servers. In both of these boxes I must spec a hardware RAID controller. I basically have two choices. First is a multi-channel controller that has the Adaptec 7897 chipset. It is a 4 channel controller. http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/obsidian/specs.htm The second is an American Megatrends based controller. It is only 1 channel. http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/perc2sc/specs.htm I have read conflicting statements in the list archives about whether I can make these puppies run. Can I get either one of these to work without much rigging? If both can be used... which one is better/easier and more likely to work well? Thank you, Aaron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 16 15:30:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (mass.cdrom.com [204.216.28.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EA214F2D for ; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:29:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01657; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:32:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199912162332.PAA01657@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Aaron Sonntag" Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:21:22 CST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:32:39 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I am looking at getting my hands on a couple of Dell PowerEdge 4300 servers. > In both of these boxes I must spec a hardware RAID controller. I basically > have two choices. > > First is a multi-channel controller that has the Adaptec 7897 chipset. It > is a 4 channel controller. > http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/obsidian/specs.htm This is an Adaptec aac-364 with a Dell label on it. It's only supported under NT. > The second is an American Megatrends based controller. It is only 1 > channel. > http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/perc2sc/specs.htm This is an AMI MegaRAID 466. We support this under the 4.x branch. > I have read conflicting statements in the list archives about whether I can > make these puppies run. Can I get either one of these to work without much > rigging? If both can be used... which one is better/easier and more likely > to work well? If you want to use FreeBSD, you need the PERC 2/SC. If you want to run 3.x, you will either need a separate boot volume (eg. another SCSI disk or an IDE disk), or you'll need to wait a little while for boot/install support in the 3.x family. FreeBSD 4.0 will install directly onto this controller, and if you're interested you can grab a snapshot and try it out. > On a completely separate note... > anybody have opinions on the best high end video card for x-windows? Voodoo 3 or Matrox G400. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 16 16:54:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from dns.sonntag.org (dns.sonntag.org [216.140.186.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CBB14CB1; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 16:53:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) Received: from aaron (cs2744-250.austin.rr.com [24.27.44.250]) by dns.sonntag.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA37276; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 18:53:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) From: "Aaron Sonntag" To: "Mike Smith" Cc: Subject: RE: SCSI RAID controller support Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 18:52:17 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <199912162332.PAA01657@mass.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yeah the Dell rep was telling me that the Adaptec controller was an OEM based on the 7897 chipset. I am not going to be allowed to run 4.x on this server. I will be able to run 3.4 when it is on CD later this month. Will this help? I also did not plan on booting from the RAID controller. I had planned on doing software mirroring on the SCSI boot drives and the RAID5 on the hardware controller. Will this allow me to use the Dell/Adaptec controller at all? I read in some FreeBSD documentation that the 7897 chipset was supported... but I guess not in a RAID controller? Based upon what you said I can at least use the AMI controller with 3.4 if I don't mind booting off a different controller right? I hate to drag this out but a lot of money is involved (relatively) and I really only have one shot at this. Thanks for your help thus far! One more question. Is there any vendor like Dell or SAG that is FreeBSD friendly? Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Mike Smith [mailto:msmith@FreeBSD.ORG] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 5:33 PM To: Aaron Sonntag Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: > I am looking at getting my hands on a couple of Dell PowerEdge 4300 servers. > In both of these boxes I must spec a hardware RAID controller. I basically > have two choices. > > First is a multi-channel controller that has the Adaptec 7897 chipset. It > is a 4 channel controller. > http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/obsidian/specs.htm This is an Adaptec aac-364 with a Dell label on it. It's only supported under NT. > The second is an American Megatrends based controller. It is only 1 > channel. > http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/perc2sc/specs.htm This is an AMI MegaRAID 466. We support this under the 4.x branch. > I have read conflicting statements in the list archives about whether I can > make these puppies run. Can I get either one of these to work without much > rigging? If both can be used... which one is better/easier and more likely > to work well? If you want to use FreeBSD, you need the PERC 2/SC. If you want to run 3.x, you will either need a separate boot volume (eg. another SCSI disk or an IDE disk), or you'll need to wait a little while for boot/install support in the 3.x family. FreeBSD 4.0 will install directly onto this controller, and if you're interested you can grab a snapshot and try it out. > On a completely separate note... > anybody have opinions on the best high end video card for x-windows? Voodoo 3 or Matrox G400. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 16 17:32:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (mass.cdrom.com [204.216.28.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669D414E0D; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 17:32:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03472; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 17:35:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199912170135.RAA03472@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Aaron Sonntag" Cc: "Mike Smith" , FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCSI RAID controller support In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 Dec 1999 18:52:17 CST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 17:35:31 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Yeah the Dell rep was telling me that the Adaptec controller was an OEM > based on the 7897 chipset. Er. Well, saying the aac-364 is "based on the 7897 chipset" is a bit like saying my car is "based on Michelins". Yes, it does use them, but it's really a complete computer system built around a StrongARM 110. > I am not going to be allowed to run 4.x on this > server. I will be able to run 3.4 when it is on CD later this month. Will > this help? I also did not plan on booting from the RAID controller. I had > planned on doing software mirroring on the SCSI boot drives and the RAID5 on > the hardware controller. Ok. Note that you can't really "software mirror" the boot volume either, unless you're talking about something else I'm not aware of. > Will this allow me to use the Dell/Adaptec > controller at all? I read in some FreeBSD documentation that the 7897 > chipset was supported... but I guess not in a RAID controller? The aic7897 is supported, yes. The Adaptec aac-364 is not. > Based upon > what you said I can at least use the AMI controller with 3.4 if I don't mind > booting off a different controller right? I hate to drag this out but a lot > of money is involved (relatively) and I really only have one shot at this. Not a problem. Yes, the AMI controller is perfectly viable with 3.4, and I've been getting quite a lot of good feedback on it so far. > One more question. Is there any vendor like Dell or SAG that is FreeBSD > friendly? This is always a difficult recommendation to make, simply because anything I say may be taken as endorsement and I don't want people to feel left out. Having said that, I've never had cause to regret recommending both Telenet Systems (www.tesys.com) and ASA Computers (www.asacomputers.com). -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 16 17:39:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl.sentex.ca (vinyl.sentex.ca [209.112.4.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B6B152EB for ; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 17:39:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite-atm.sentex.ca [209.112.4.1]) by vinyl.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA49359; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 20:39:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from ospf-mdt.sentex.net (ospf-mdt.sentex.net [205.211.164.81]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA02235; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 20:39:37 -0500 (EST) From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: aaron@sonntag.org ("Aaron Sonntag") Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCSI RAID Controller support? Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 01:39:36 GMT Message-ID: <38599363.1815035172@mail.sentex.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99e/32.227 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 16 Dec 1999 14:53:39 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.hardware you wrote: >I am looking at getting my hands on a couple of Dell PowerEdge 4300 servers. >In both of these boxes I must spec a hardware RAID controller. I basically >have two choices. > >First is a multi-channel controller that has the Adaptec 7897 chipset. It >is a 4 channel controller. >http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/obsidian/specs.htm There is no RAID support for this controller that I know of. >The second is an American Megatrends based controller. It is only 1 >channel. >http://support.dell.com/docs/storage/perc2sc/specs.htm Perhaps. There is support for several of the MegaRAID cards. Have a look through the freebsd-current mailing list to see which ones are currently under development. I am using a 428, and it works quite well so far on STABLE. amrd0: rev 0x03 int a irq 5 on pci0.9.0 amr0: firmware UF80 bios 1.61 16MB memory amrd0: 2020MB (4136960 sectors) RAID 5 (optimal) You can get the drivers from www.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) Sentex Communications Corp, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 6:20:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (polaris.we.lc.ehu.es [158.227.6.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5629814C3B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 06:20:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jose@we.lc.ehu.es) Received: from we.lc.ehu.es (garatu [158.227.6.222]) by polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA10294 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:20:10 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <385A4699.27910FA5@we.lc.ehu.es> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 15:20:09 +0100 From: "Jose M. Alcaide" Organization: Universidad del =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pa=EDs?= Vasco - Dpto. de Electricidad y =?iso-8859-1?Q?Electr=F3nica?= X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: es-ES, es, en-US, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD on Athlon-based Kryotech systems? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, We are considering the Kryotech Super-G (AMD Athlon @ 1GHz) as a number-crunching machine. Does anybody have any experiences with Athlon-based Kryotech systems running FreeBSD? TIA, -- JMA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- José Mª Alcaide | mailto:jose@we.lc.ehu.es Universidad del País Vasco | mailto:jmas@FreeBSD.org Dpto. de Electricidad y Electrónica | http://www.we.lc.ehu.es/~jose Facultad de Ciencias - Campus de Lejona | Tel.: +34-946012479 48940 Lejona (Vizcaya) - SPAIN | Fax: +34-946013071 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers" -- Leonard Brandwein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 7:24:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from nautilus.shore.net (nautilus.shore.net [207.244.124.104]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4701D14FA6 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 07:24:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kylet@shore.net) Received: from shell3.shore.net [207.244.124.103] by nautilus.shore.net with esmtp (Exim) for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org id 11yzFK-0000AV-00; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:24:42 -0500 Received: from kylet by shell3.shore.net with local (Exim) id 11yzFK-0004Tw-00; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:24:42 -0500 Subject: FreeBSD 3.3 on Compaq 4500 w/ Smart RAID 2/E To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:24:42 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL37 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1084 Message-Id: From: Kyle Tucker Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have a Compaq 4500 which is EISA bus (no PCI) with a Smart RAID Array 2/E controller. From all my attempts and research I have come up with the followinq conclusions, perhaps all incorrect. :) - Any SCSI disks in the 4500 itself on the embedded controller can't use the NCR driver (ncr0) as it appears to be a PCI driver and 3.3 refused to load it from visual config as device ncr0 is not found. - According to an old post, I cannot load the OS directly onto the RAID array, that I must put the OS in a seperate disk and use the array for extra storage. I also could not get a custom kernel to recognize it without hard-coding the EISA slot number in ida.c as someone suggested and then the system hangs during the auto probe. So am I barking up the wrong tree here or should I be able to load the OS on either of these? If on the embedded controller, what driver do I need? - Kyle --------------------------------------------- kylet@shore.net http://www.shore.net/~kylet UNIX Sys Admin "Grandpa, what was NT?" --------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 7:40:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.ocsny.com (apollo.ocsny.com [204.107.76.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AC314E8D for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 07:40:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikel@ocsny.com) Received: from ocsny.com (mikel.ocsny.com [204.107.76.17]) by apollo.ocsny.com (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA91225 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:39:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <385A5A00.C5574C37@ocsny.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:42:56 -0500 From: Mikel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: swap space.. Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------D261A885B94BDB60298776D6" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------D261A885B94BDB60298776D6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This may seem like a silly question but...here goes... I just bumped up one of my srvrs in ram, and of course the swap space is not larger than the new ram config...anyway, I am considering adding another 18g of disk space...if I partition some swap on that drive would I need to do anything to fBSD; or will automatically note the change and take advantage of the new config? -- Cheers, Mikel +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | Optimized Computer Solutions, Inc http://www.ocsny.com | 39 W14th Street, Suite 203 212 727 2238 x132 | New York, NY 10011 +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | Labor rates: Tech $125 hourly | Net Engineer $150 hourly | Phone Support $ 33 quarter hourly | Lost Password $ 45 per incedent +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | http://www.ocsny.com/~mikel +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ --------------D261A885B94BDB60298776D6 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="mikel.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Mikel Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mikel.vcf" begin:vcard n:King;Mikel x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:Optimized Computer Solutions version:2.1 email;internet:mikel@ocsny.com title:Procurement Manager tel;fax:2124638402 tel;home:http://www.upan.org/vizkr tel;work:2127272100 adr;quoted-printable:;;39 W14th St.=0D=0ASte 203;New York;NY;10011;US x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:Mikel King end:vcard --------------D261A885B94BDB60298776D6-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 8: 7:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from dns.sonntag.org (dns.sonntag.org [216.140.186.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92E5150A0; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 08:07:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) Received: from WIN2K1 (st84042.nobell.com [216.140.184.42]) by dns.sonntag.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA41391; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:06:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) From: "Aaron Sonntag" To: "Mike Smith" , "Aaron Sonntag" Cc: Subject: RE: SCSI RAID controller support Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:07:54 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.5600 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <199912170135.RAA03472@mass.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thank your for your help thus far! Mr. Smith, you said that I can't mirror the boot drive either. How would you go about securing the OS in a server such as the one I am looking at purchasing? It doesn't do me much good to have 10,000 worth of hot swap drives and power supplies if my main OS is still residing on a single point of failure... any thoughts? What is the minimum I would have to have on this boot drive? I could put /usr and /var and /etc on the RAID array correct? Or do you mean I can't have the boot sector proper on the raid array... meaning that a tiny slice of the OS for the boot partition is all I need to be off of the array? I have to make this system completely redundant at least one time over and at this point the only hole seems to be the lack of any ability to protect the main OS with mirroring via hardware(controller) or software(FreeBSD vinum?). Your thoughts and time are greatly appreciated. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Mike Smith Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 7:36 PM To: Aaron Sonntag Cc: Mike Smith; FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCSI RAID controller support > Yeah the Dell rep was telling me that the Adaptec controller was an OEM > based on the 7897 chipset. Er. Well, saying the aac-364 is "based on the 7897 chipset" is a bit like saying my car is "based on Michelins". Yes, it does use them, but it's really a complete computer system built around a StrongARM 110. > I am not going to be allowed to run 4.x on this > server. I will be able to run 3.4 when it is on CD later this month. Will > this help? I also did not plan on booting from the RAID controller. I had > planned on doing software mirroring on the SCSI boot drives and the RAID5 on > the hardware controller. Ok. Note that you can't really "software mirror" the boot volume either, unless you're talking about something else I'm not aware of. > Will this allow me to use the Dell/Adaptec > controller at all? I read in some FreeBSD documentation that the 7897 > chipset was supported... but I guess not in a RAID controller? The aic7897 is supported, yes. The Adaptec aac-364 is not. > Based upon > what you said I can at least use the AMI controller with 3.4 if I don't mind > booting off a different controller right? I hate to drag this out but a lot > of money is involved (relatively) and I really only have one shot at this. Not a problem. Yes, the AMI controller is perfectly viable with 3.4, and I've been getting quite a lot of good feedback on it so far. > One more question. Is there any vendor like Dell or SAG that is FreeBSD > friendly? This is always a difficult recommendation to make, simply because anything I say may be taken as endorsement and I don't want people to feel left out. Having said that, I've never had cause to regret recommending both Telenet Systems (www.tesys.com) and ASA Computers (www.asacomputers.com). -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 9: 2:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de (dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.243.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E6214F84 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:02:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA03117 for freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:02:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:02:22 +0100 (CET) From: Oliver Fromme Message-Id: <199912171702.SAA03117@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: swap space.. Organization: Administration TU Clausthal Reply-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 RZTUC(3) PL2] Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org (Actually this belongs to -questions.) Mikel wrote in list.freebsd-hardware: > I just bumped up one of my srvrs in ram, and of course the swap space > is not larger than the new ram config...anyway, I am considering adding > another 18g of disk space...if I partition some swap on that drive > would I need to do anything to fBSD; or will automatically note the > change and take advantage of the new config? Just add the new swap partition to your /etc/fstab, reboot, and everything works as expected. Use the "swapon" command to add the new swap space immediately (if you don't want to reboot). Use the "swapinfo" command to verify that all of your swap partitions are really in use. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, Leibnizstr. 18/61, 38678 Clausthal, Germany (Info: finger userinfo:olli@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de) "In jedem Stück Kohle wartet ein Diamant auf seine Geburt" (Terry Pratchett) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 9:20:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from bomber.avantgo.com (ws1.avantgo.com [207.214.200.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F6B1578E; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:20:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott@avantgo.com) Received: from river ([10.0.128.30]) by bomber.avantgo.com (Netscape Messaging Server 3.5) with SMTP id 354; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:16:24 -0800 Message-ID: <14d601bf48b2$e534bb00$1e80000a@avantgo.com> From: "Scott Hess" To: "Aaron Sonntag" , "Mike Smith" Cc: References: Subject: Re: SCSI RAID controller support Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:19:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org You are correct in that you only need enough on the non-RAID device to boot the system. The easiest option would be to just put all of / on the boot device, maybe 10M-20M, total. You could also likely wire together a system where the kernel and some minimal subset exist on the boot device, with the real root mounted over the boot root after the requisite drivers are in place (I'm not sure if FreeBSD has any equivalent to the /boot partition, which is specifically for this type of thing). WARNING: there's a reason that the / partition is there! A minimal / should contain all (ALL) of the tools you need to repair the system (in fact, it never hurts to try booting single user and seeing whether you know how to get things done without /usr mounted). For that reason, I would recommend that instead of playing tricks to get a mirrorred /, you instead manually mirror /, arrange things so that you can mount it read-only, and then use standard mounting tricks to get the majority of your system up and running. If the normal boot / dies, boot from the backup boot /. Or just punt and get a RAID controller you can boot from, scott ----- Original Message ----- From: Aaron Sonntag To: Mike Smith ; Aaron Sonntag Cc: Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 8:07 AM Subject: RE: SCSI RAID controller support > Thank your for your help thus far! > > Mr. Smith, you said that I can't mirror the boot drive either. How would > you go about securing the OS in a server such as the one I am looking at > purchasing? It doesn't do me much good to have 10,000 worth of hot swap > drives and power supplies if my main OS is still residing on a single point > of failure... any thoughts? What is the minimum I would have to have on > this boot drive? I could put /usr and /var and /etc on the RAID array > correct? Or do you mean I can't have the boot sector proper on the raid > array... meaning that a tiny slice of the OS for the boot partition is all I > need to be off of the array? I have to make this system completely > redundant at least one time over and at this point the only hole seems to be > the lack of any ability to protect the main OS with mirroring via > hardware(controller) or software(FreeBSD vinum?). Your thoughts and time > are greatly appreciated. > > Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Mike Smith > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 7:36 PM > To: Aaron Sonntag > Cc: Mike Smith; FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: SCSI RAID controller support > > > Yeah the Dell rep was telling me that the Adaptec controller was an OEM > > based on the 7897 chipset. > > Er. Well, saying the aac-364 is "based on the 7897 chipset" is a bit > like saying my car is "based on Michelins". Yes, it does use them, but > it's really a complete computer system built around a StrongARM 110. > > > I am not going to be allowed to run 4.x on this > > server. I will be able to run 3.4 when it is on CD later this month. > Will > > this help? I also did not plan on booting from the RAID controller. I > had > > planned on doing software mirroring on the SCSI boot drives and the RAID5 > on > > the hardware controller. > > Ok. Note that you can't really "software mirror" the boot volume either, > unless you're talking about something else I'm not aware of. > > > Will this allow me to use the Dell/Adaptec > > controller at all? I read in some FreeBSD documentation that the 7897 > > chipset was supported... but I guess not in a RAID controller? > > The aic7897 is supported, yes. The Adaptec aac-364 is not. > > > Based upon > > what you said I can at least use the AMI controller with 3.4 if I don't > mind > > booting off a different controller right? I hate to drag this out but a > lot > > of money is involved (relatively) and I really only have one shot at this. > > Not a problem. Yes, the AMI controller is perfectly viable with 3.4, and > I've been getting quite a lot of good feedback on it so far. > > > One more question. Is there any vendor like Dell or SAG that is FreeBSD > > friendly? > > This is always a difficult recommendation to make, simply because > anything I say may be taken as endorsement and I don't want people to > feel left out. Having said that, I've never had cause to regret > recommending both Telenet Systems (www.tesys.com) and ASA Computers > (www.asacomputers.com). > > -- > \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith > \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org > \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 9:34:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from sirius.stella-net.fr (sirius.stella-net.fr [195.154.71.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1D014D9B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:34:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garry@stella-net.fr) Received: from stella-net.fr (gateway.cannes.aerospatiale.fr [193.56.34.104]) by sirius.stella-net.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA07016 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:33:12 +0100 Message-ID: <385A7575.18260455@stella-net.fr> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:40:06 +0100 From: Philippe Charron Organization: Alcatel Space Industries X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Rat & Vat Mbone tools and SB 128 PCI Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------77490C8DFC7670C6E494D691" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------77490C8DFC7670C6E494D691 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am trying to use Rat and Vat with FreeBSD 3.3 and a Sound Blaster PCI 128 (es1371) I used a patch call es1371-5.src3.patch and audio application like x11amp works perfectly but I have no sound with Rat, an vat freeze with the message "failed set input line volume" With a Sound Blaster 64PCI (es1370) only rat v3.2.5 works fine but can't interact with vat. Someone have an idea, a path, or even a recommended card (a card that can be find easily : i have to configure about 20 PCs like that). Thank you Regards P. Charron --------------77490C8DFC7670C6E494D691 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="garry.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Philippe Charron Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="garry.vcf" begin:vcard n:Charron;Philippe tel;cell:+33 6 62 57 66 50 tel;fax:+33 4 92 92 76 10 tel;work:+33 4 92 92 79 89 x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:Alcatel Space Industries;Departement Multimedia version:2.1 email;internet:garry@stella-net.fr adr;quoted-printable:;;BP 99=0D=0A100 Bvd du Midi;Cannes La Bocca;;06 156;France x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:Philippe Charron end:vcard --------------77490C8DFC7670C6E494D691-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 9:36: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from dns.sonntag.org (dns.sonntag.org [216.140.186.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7133C14DB6 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:36:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) Received: from WIN2K1 (st84042.nobell.com [216.140.184.42]) by dns.sonntag.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA42052; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:35:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from aaron@sonntag.org) From: "Aaron Sonntag" To: "Scott Hess" , "Aaron Sonntag" Cc: Subject: RE: SCSI RAID controller support Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:36:38 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.5600 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <14d601bf48b2$e534bb00$1e80000a@avantgo.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ok so we get back to the RAID controller... can I not boot from the AMI MegaRAID controller? -----Original Message----- From: Scott Hess [mailto:scott@avantgo.com] Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 11:20 AM To: Aaron Sonntag; Mike Smith Cc: FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCSI RAID controller support You are correct in that you only need enough on the non-RAID device to boot the system. The easiest option would be to just put all of / on the boot device, maybe 10M-20M, total. You could also likely wire together a system where the kernel and some minimal subset exist on the boot device, with the real root mounted over the boot root after the requisite drivers are in place (I'm not sure if FreeBSD has any equivalent to the /boot partition, which is specifically for this type of thing). WARNING: there's a reason that the / partition is there! A minimal / should contain all (ALL) of the tools you need to repair the system (in fact, it never hurts to try booting single user and seeing whether you know how to get things done without /usr mounted). For that reason, I would recommend that instead of playing tricks to get a mirrorred /, you instead manually mirror /, arrange things so that you can mount it read-only, and then use standard mounting tricks to get the majority of your system up and running. If the normal boot / dies, boot from the backup boot /. Or just punt and get a RAID controller you can boot from, scott ----- Original Message ----- From: Aaron Sonntag To: Mike Smith ; Aaron Sonntag Cc: Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 8:07 AM Subject: RE: SCSI RAID controller support > Thank your for your help thus far! > > Mr. Smith, you said that I can't mirror the boot drive either. How would > you go about securing the OS in a server such as the one I am looking at > purchasing? It doesn't do me much good to have 10,000 worth of hot swap > drives and power supplies if my main OS is still residing on a single point > of failure... any thoughts? What is the minimum I would have to have on > this boot drive? I could put /usr and /var and /etc on the RAID array > correct? Or do you mean I can't have the boot sector proper on the raid > array... meaning that a tiny slice of the OS for the boot partition is all I > need to be off of the array? I have to make this system completely > redundant at least one time over and at this point the only hole seems to be > the lack of any ability to protect the main OS with mirroring via > hardware(controller) or software(FreeBSD vinum?). Your thoughts and time > are greatly appreciated. > > Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Mike Smith > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 7:36 PM > To: Aaron Sonntag > Cc: Mike Smith; FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: SCSI RAID controller support > > > Yeah the Dell rep was telling me that the Adaptec controller was an OEM > > based on the 7897 chipset. > > Er. Well, saying the aac-364 is "based on the 7897 chipset" is a bit > like saying my car is "based on Michelins". Yes, it does use them, but > it's really a complete computer system built around a StrongARM 110. > > > I am not going to be allowed to run 4.x on this > > server. I will be able to run 3.4 when it is on CD later this month. > Will > > this help? I also did not plan on booting from the RAID controller. I > had > > planned on doing software mirroring on the SCSI boot drives and the RAID5 > on > > the hardware controller. > > Ok. Note that you can't really "software mirror" the boot volume either, > unless you're talking about something else I'm not aware of. > > > Will this allow me to use the Dell/Adaptec > > controller at all? I read in some FreeBSD documentation that the 7897 > > chipset was supported... but I guess not in a RAID controller? > > The aic7897 is supported, yes. The Adaptec aac-364 is not. > > > Based upon > > what you said I can at least use the AMI controller with 3.4 if I don't > mind > > booting off a different controller right? I hate to drag this out but a > lot > > of money is involved (relatively) and I really only have one shot at this. > > Not a problem. Yes, the AMI controller is perfectly viable with 3.4, and > I've been getting quite a lot of good feedback on it so far. > > > One more question. Is there any vendor like Dell or SAG that is FreeBSD > > friendly? > > This is always a difficult recommendation to make, simply because > anything I say may be taken as endorsement and I don't want people to > feel left out. Having said that, I've never had cause to regret > recommending both Telenet Systems (www.tesys.com) and ASA Computers > (www.asacomputers.com). > > -- > \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith > \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org > \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 9:38:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from ns.nobell.com (ns.nobell.com [216.140.184.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0E415006; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:38:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aaron@nobell.com) Received: from WIN2K1 (st84042.nobell.com [216.140.184.42]) by ns.nobell.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA55143; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:38:15 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from aaron@nobell.com) From: "Aaron Sonntag" To: "Freebsd Hackers" , "Freebsd-Hardware" Subject: PRO/100+ DUAL PORT SERVER ADAPTER Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:38:57 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.5600 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Anybody have positive experience with this adapter? I will be using it in a router box. PRO/100+ DUAL PORT SERVER ADAPTER Thank you, Aaron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 9:44:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540201571B; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:44:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 703AB1C2B; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:44:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA66381B; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:44:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:44:10 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Aaron Sonntag Cc: Freebsd Hackers , Freebsd-Hardware Subject: Re: PRO/100+ DUAL PORT SERVER ADAPTER In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Aaron Sonntag wrote: > Anybody have positive experience with this adapter? > I will be using it in a router box. > > PRO/100+ DUAL PORT SERVER ADAPTER pcib3: at device 10.0 on pci2 pci3: on pcib3 fxp0: irq 10 at device 4.0 on pci3 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:90:27:2a:65:3e fxp1: irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci3 fxp1: Ethernet address 00:90:27:2a:65:3f Works perfectly over here. FreeBSD hawk.internal.chc-chimes.com 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #9: Mon Dec 13 22:07:08 EST 1999 billf@hawk.internal.chc-chimes.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/LOVEMACHINE i386 -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 11:22:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B217614D7A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:22:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA02922; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:22:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:22:09 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi To: Aaron Sonntag Cc: Freebsd-Hardware Subject: Re: PRO/100+ DUAL PORT SERVER ADAPTER In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Aaron Sonntag wrote: > Anybody have positive experience with this adapter? > I will be using it in a router box. > > PRO/100+ DUAL PORT SERVER ADAPTER Should be an adapter with a pci-pci bridge and 2x intel 8255{8,9} chips. > > Thank you, > > Aaron > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 17 12:11: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (mass.cdrom.com [204.216.28.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24011582F for ; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:10:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA00848; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:13:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199912172013.MAA00848@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Aaron Sonntag" Cc: "Scott Hess" , FreeBSD-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCSI RAID controller support In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:36:38 CST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:13:51 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Ok so we get back to the RAID controller... can I not boot from the AMI > MegaRAID controller? I believe I've already answered that question. At this point in time, you can't boot from or install to an AMI MegaRAID controller under FreeBSD 3.4 or earlier. You can do this with the upcoming 4.0 release, and I expect that when I stop answering questions about it, the 3.4-STABLE branch will develop this ability as well. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Dec 20 8:30:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.netvision.net.il (alpha.netvision.net.il [194.90.1.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFA1152F6 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 08:30:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spud@i.am) Received: from Tomer.Home.Org (ras4-p195.hfa.netvision.net.il [62.0.148.195]) by alpha.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.8.6) with SMTP id SAA05537 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 18:30:09 +0200 (IST) From: Tomer Weller To: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: wheel mouse Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 18:32:36 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99122018330700.00717@Tomer.Home.Org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Is it possible to use a wheel of a wheel mouse in X (KDE) ? -- Tomer Weller wellers@netvision.net.il To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Dec 20 8:45:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from persprog.com (persprog.com [209.208.0.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E403F14CD0 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 08:45:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dave@mmrd.com) Received: by persprog.com (8.7.5/4.10) id LAA15231; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:41:37 -0500 Received: from dave.ppi.com(192.2.2.6) by cerberus.ppi.com via smap (V1.3) id sma015229; Mon Dec 20 11:41:25 1999 Message-Id: <4.2.2.19991220114010.00a8aad0@192.2.2.24> X-Sender: dave@192.2.2.24 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:42:29 -0500 To: Tomer Weller , hardware@FreeBSD.ORG From: "David W. Alderman" Subject: Re: wheel mouse In-Reply-To: <99122018330700.00717@Tomer.Home.Org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yes. See http://www.inria.fr/koala/colas/mouse-wheel-scroll/ I haven't tried this myself, yet. :-) At 06:32 PM 12/20/1999 +0200, Tomer Weller wrote: >Is it possible to use a wheel of a wheel mouse in X (KDE) ? >-- >Tomer Weller >wellers@netvision.net.il > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message Dave Alderman Business: dave@mmrd.com Personal: dwa@atlantic.net -or- dwa@netcommander.com Views stated yadda yadda employer yadda. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 21 15: 2:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from cheddar.netmonger.net (cheddar.netmonger.net [209.54.21.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DCD1558F for ; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 15:02:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@cheddar.netmonger.net) Received: (from chris@localhost) by cheddar.netmonger.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA05065; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 18:02:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19991221180249.A4632@netmonger.net> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 18:02:49 -0500 From: Christopher Masto To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Intel 820 chipset (Asus P3C)? Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I may be able to get one of these: http://www.asus.com/Products/Motherboard/Pentiumpro/P3c-l/index.html I don't tend to keep up with hardware stuff; I've always hated the PC architecture and talk of motherboards and bus speeds and such tends to nauseate me. I therefore find myself quite unfamiliar with this chipset, and I can't find reference to it in the archives. I have heard of the 440BX, but not this i820 thing. So I'd really appreciate it if someone says "Yes, that'll work fine", or "No, you can't boot" or "It works, but not the USB controller" or something. I'm particularly curious about the IDE controller (I have an ATA66 drive and it would be nice to use it) and the USB. I'll be running -current on it; this is an upgrade for my play machine. -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 21 17:18: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mario.zyan.com (mario.zyan.com [209.250.96.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEAD14BF3 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 17:17:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from irc@ex-pressnet.com) Received: from micron ([208.41.125.162]) by mario.zyan.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA40706 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 17:17:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from irc@ex-pressnet.com) From: "KB" To: Subject: ATA/66 IDE Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 20:16:34 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello & Happy Holidays! I was wondering if FreeBSD 3.3 or any later versions supported 'Promises Ultra66 IDE Controller' for 66MB/sec burst data transfers. I have it on one of my boxes & would like to use it. Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 21 22: 2: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from falla.videotron.net (falla.videotron.net [205.151.222.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF9A150D2 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 22:02:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from youlgok@attglobal.net) Received: from attglobal.net ([24.200.44.120]) by falla.videotron.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.07.30.00.05.p8) with ESMTP id <0FN400IH0ORB4G@falla.videotron.net> for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:01:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:02:39 -0500 From: Youlgok Subject: [Q] AHA 15xx controller To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Reply-To: youlgok@attglobal.net Message-id: <3860697F.DD9365A9@attglobal.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386) Content-type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From a Handbook for 2.2.x, AHA-1505, 152x, 1535, 154x are all supported by FreeBSD. But in the Handbook for 3.x, which is currently on http://www.freebsd.org, mentioned only AHA-1535 and 154x. Are AHA-1505 or 152x supported by FreeBSD-3.3-stable? And which one is the most recommendable? I found from Adaptec's web page that they sells AHA-1505 kit at $55.00. Thanks in advance and Merry Christmas! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 22 1: 4:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (border.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B173815432 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:04:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <40336>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:55:39 +1100 Content-return: prohibited Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:04:26 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: [Q] AHA 15xx controller In-reply-to: <3860697F.DD9365A9@attglobal.net>; from youlgok@attglobal.net on Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 05:02:39PM +1100 To: Youlgok Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <99Dec22.195539est.40336@border.alcanet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <3860697F.DD9365A9@attglobal.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 1999-Dec-22 17:02:39 +1100, Youlgok wrote: > Are AHA-1505 or 152x supported by FreeBSD-3.3-stable? I'll leave this one because I'm not certain. > And which one is the most recommendable? The 154x cards are probably the best choice. The 1505 and 152x cards are PIO-only, so you incur a hefty CPU overhead - best avoided unless you like seeing how many `+' symbols you can get on a systat -v screen :-). I don't know the 1535. > I found from Adaptec's web page that they sells AHA-1505 >kit at $55.00. This sounds quite expensive. You should be able to find an NCR-based PCI card for that much. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 22 5:37:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [192.68.44.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03FD154D7 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:37:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert.schofield@philips.com) Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id OAA26553 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:37:08 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from robert.schofield@philips.com) From: robert.schofield@philips.com Received: from smtprelay-eur1.philips.com(130.139.36.3) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma026544; Wed, 22 Dec 99 14:37:16 +0100 Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10]) by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id OAA22563 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:37:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from EHLMS01.DIAMOND.PHILIPS.COM (ehlms01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.139.54.212]) by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id OAA17515 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:35:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by EHLMS01.DIAMOND.PHILIPS.COM (Soft-Switch LMS 4.0) with snapi via EMEA2 id 0056890007545459; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:36:10 +0100 To: Subject: Re: Intel 820 chipset (Asus P3C)? Message-ID: <0056890007545459000002L992*@MHS> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:36:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name="MEMO 12/22/99 14:28:03" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Avoid it like the plague, even if it s free. I820 is the much vaunted, = excessively buggy RAMBUS chipset.=20 A lot of manufacturers were caught out by the discovery of major memory= timing and cache reliability=20 problems when more than two RAMBUS slots were filled. Hence a number of the boards that were underway to delivery are now bei= ng dumped en masse as they are pretty much scrap and unsaleable - plus. if they are not popul= ated with RB SIMMs, you have about *zero* chance of a) actually getting any, since very few companies are = producing RAMBUS cards b) finding anyone willing to sell them as PC133 ramps up even if they had any in t= he first place c) buying them at prices anywhere below the price of a reasonable family car. Rob Schofield -- "Not quick, but brilliant!" - quote from a (good) friend. = To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 22 7: 7:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from bogslab.ucdavis.edu (bogslab.ucdavis.edu [169.237.68.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FBB15550 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 07:05:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from greg@bogslab.ucdavis.edu) Received: from thistle.bogs.org (thistle.bogs.org [198.137.203.61]) by bogslab.ucdavis.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA22506 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 07:05:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from thistle.bogs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thistle.bogs.org (8.9.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA86323 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 07:08:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912221508.HAA86323@thistle.bogs.org> To: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-To: Peter Jeremy X-Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Q] AHA 15xx controller In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:04:26 +1100." <99Dec22.195539est.40336@border.alcanet.com.au> Reply-To: gkshenaut@ucdavis.edu Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 07:07:59 -0800 From: Greg Shenaut Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <99Dec22.195539est.40336@border.alcanet.com.au>, Peter Jeremy cleopede: >On 1999-Dec-22 17:02:39 +1100, Youlgok wrote: >> Are AHA-1505 or 152x supported by FreeBSD-3.3-stable? > >I'll leave this one because I'm not certain. > >> And which one is the most recommendable? > >The 154x cards are probably the best choice. The 1505 and 152x cards >are PIO-only, so you incur a hefty CPU overhead - best avoided unless >you like seeing how many `+' symbols you can get on a systat -v screen >:-). I don't know the 1535. > >> I found from Adaptec's web page that they sells AHA-1505 >>kit at $55.00. > >This sounds quite expensive. You should be able to find an >NCR-based PCI card for that much. I recently bought 6 Tekram DC-310's from egghead.com at $23 each. On the topic of the 152x vs the 154x, though, the PIO only mode of the former may or may not be less efficient than the busmaster DMA of the latter: DMA, even busmaster DMA, does steal cycles and represents a performance hit on the CPU. And in addition to that, if you have more than 16MB of RAM, the DMA-ed data from the 154x, but not the 152x, will have to be copied up from a bounce buffer. Adaptec's theory, if I remember it correctly, was that using the fast block-mode copy-in/copy-out instructions could in many cases be faster than busmaster DMA. Greg Shenaut To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 22 8:31:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from pointer.raytheon.co.uk (pointer.raytheon.co.uk [193.115.14.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A8E15526 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 08:31:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Chris.Smith@raytheon.co.uk) Received: from rslhub.raytheon.co.uk (unverified) by pointer.raytheon.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with SMTP id for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:36:18 +0000 Received: by rslhub.raytheon.co.uk(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.2 (693.3 8-11-1998)) id 0025684F.005AAFC0 ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:30:32 +0000 X-Lotus-FromDomain: RAYTHEONUK From: Chris.Smith@raytheon.co.uk To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Message-Id: <0025684F.005AAEB2.00@rslhub.raytheon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:30:04 +0000 Subject: 820's can burn in hell (an Re: reply) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org As I said. Chris smith Raytheon Systems Limited To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Dec 22 12: 4:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8191C14DAB for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 12:04:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ken@panzer.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.kdm.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA59742; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:04:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:04:25 -0700 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: Youlgok Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Q] AHA 15xx controller Message-ID: <19991222130425.A59670@panzer.kdm.org> References: <3860697F.DD9365A9@attglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <3860697F.DD9365A9@attglobal.net>; from youlgok@attglobal.net on Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 01:02:39AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 01:02:39 -0500, Youlgok wrote: > >From a Handbook for 2.2.x, AHA-1505, 152x, 1535, 154x are all supported > by FreeBSD. But in the Handbook for 3.x, which is currently on > http://www.freebsd.org, mentioned only AHA-1535 and 154x. Are AHA-1505 > or 152x supported by FreeBSD-3.3-stable? And which one is the most > recommendable? I found from Adaptec's web page that they sells AHA-1505 > kit at $55.00. Other folks have mentioned that the 154x boards are preferrable if you've got to get an ISA board. That is true. As for the handbook, it is out of date. The 150x/152x cards, which are based on the AIC-6260 and AIC-6360 chips, are supported now. They weren't originally supported in CAM (3.x), but Luoqi Chen rewrote the aic driver, so they are supported now. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 23 14:30:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from server1.wallnet.com (server1.wallnet.com [208.225.162.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3B014BCA for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:30:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cweimann@server1.wallnet.com) Received: (from cweimann@localhost) by server1.wallnet.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id RAA15500 for freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:30:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19991223173047.A13219@wallnet.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:30:47 -0500 From: "Christopher S. Weimann" To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Quantum DLT tape library compatibility Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am considering buying a PowerStor L200 tape library with the DLT4000 drive but I want to make sure this is going to work on the FreeBSD box I am going to be putting it on. The box is running FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE but I can upgrade it if need be. Does anybody have any experiance with this drive? Thanks in advance. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 23 16:13: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0F914CCB for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 16:13:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id KAA21269; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 10:43:23 +1030 (CST) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 10:43:23 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: "Christopher S. Weimann" Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quantum DLT tape library compatibility Message-ID: <19991224104323.A1316@freebie.lemis.com> References: <19991223173047.A13219@wallnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <19991223173047.A13219@wallnet.com> WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thursday, 23 December 1999 at 17:30:47 -0500, Christopher S. Weimann wrote: > I am considering buying a PowerStor L200 tape library with the > DLT4000 drive but I want to make sure this is going to work on > the FreeBSD box I am going to be putting it on. > > The box is running FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE but I can upgrade it if > need be. > > Does anybody have any experiance with this drive? I have: sa1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 sa1: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) It works fine. I don't know why it shouldn't work with 2.2.7-RELEASE, but I'd suggest you upgrade anyway. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 23 16:57:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from server1.wallnet.com (server1.wallnet.com [208.225.162.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E7214A2A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 16:57:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cweimann@server1.wallnet.com) Received: (from cweimann@localhost) by server1.wallnet.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id TAA21345; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:57:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19991223195747.B20957@wallnet.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:57:47 -0500 From: "Christopher S. Weimann" To: Greg Lehey Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quantum DLT tape library compatibility References: <19991223173047.A13219@wallnet.com> <19991224104323.A1316@freebie.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <19991224104323.A1316@freebie.lemis.com>; from Greg Lehey on Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 10:43:23AM +1030 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 10:43:23AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Thursday, 23 December 1999 at 17:30:47 -0500, Christopher S. Weimann wrote: > > > > Does anybody have any experiance with this drive? > > I have: > > sa1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 > sa1: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device > sa1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) > > It works fine. I don't know why it shouldn't work with 2.2.7-RELEASE, > but I'd suggest you upgrade anyway. > Is that just the 4000 or the changer too? I wasn't too worried about the drive but I get the impression that some changers can be sort of oddball. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Weimann SysAdmin 400 Higgins Ave Wall Internet LLC. Brielle NJ, 08730 Serving almost all of New Jersey 732-223-1777 ------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 23 17:16: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ECF14BFC for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:16:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id LAA21653; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 11:46:26 +1030 (CST) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 11:46:26 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: "Christopher S. Weimann" Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quantum DLT tape library compatibility Message-ID: <19991224114626.C1316@freebie.lemis.com> References: <19991223173047.A13219@wallnet.com> <19991224104323.A1316@freebie.lemis.com> <19991223195747.B20957@wallnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <19991223195747.B20957@wallnet.com> WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thursday, 23 December 1999 at 19:57:47 -0500, Christopher S. Weimann wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 10:43:23AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: >> On Thursday, 23 December 1999 at 17:30:47 -0500, Christopher S. Weimann wrote: >>> >>> Does anybody have any experiance with this drive? >> >> I have: >> >> sa1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 >> sa1: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device >> sa1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) >> >> It works fine. I don't know why it shouldn't work with 2.2.7-RELEASE, >> but I'd suggest you upgrade anyway. > > Is that just the 4000 or the changer too? I wasn't too worried about the > drive but I get the impression that some changers can be sort of oddball. That's just the drive. I thought that's what you were asking about. The worst that can happen with the changer is that the changer commands won't work. The changers I've seen understand things like "move to next cassette on eject", which has been adequate for the things I wanted. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 23 17:57:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ED7156B2 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:57:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo [192.67.166.79]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA25965; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:59:24 -0800 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 17:59:24 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: "Christopher S. Weimann" Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quantum DLT tape library compatibility In-Reply-To: <19991224114626.C1316@freebie.lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Grog wrote: > That's just the drive. I thought that's what you were asking about. > The worst that can happen with the changer is that the changer > commands won't work. The changers I've seen understand things like > "move to next cassette on eject", which has been adequate for the > things I wanted. Ick! Stackers are bad! The DLT changer electronics/mechanics are pretty straightforward and are unlikely to be affected one way or the other. You may have a task finding the right version of amanda that can cope, but that'll be fine. Whether or not the old st driver copes with the DLT4000, who knows... probably. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 23 18:15:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from server1.wallnet.com (server1.wallnet.com [208.225.162.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C9F14C89 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 18:15:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cweimann@server1.wallnet.com) Received: (from cweimann@localhost) by server1.wallnet.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id VAA24348; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 21:15:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19991223211538.A21605@wallnet.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 21:15:38 -0500 From: "Christopher S. Weimann" To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quantum DLT tape library compatibility References: <19991224114626.C1316@freebie.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Matthew Jacob on Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 05:59:24PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 05:59:24PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Ick! Stackers are bad! > What makes you say that? > The DLT changer electronics/mechanics are pretty straightforward and are > unlikely to be affected one way or the other. You may have a task finding > the right version of amanda that can cope, but that'll be fine. The reason I addressed this question to the FreeBSD list is because the Amanda site specifically says that for changers it is dependent on the tools in the underlying OS. > Whether or > not the old st driver copes with the DLT4000, who knows... probably. > The drive apparently works for Greg. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Weimann SysAdmin 400 Higgins Ave Wall Internet LLC. Brielle NJ, 08730 Serving almost all of New Jersey 732-223-1777 ------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 23 18:38:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30E01578F for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 18:38:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA26062; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 18:40:28 -0800 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 18:40:28 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: "Christopher S. Weimann" Cc: Freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quantum DLT tape library compatibility In-Reply-To: <19991223211538.A21605@wallnet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 05:59:24PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Ick! Stackers are bad! > > > > What makes you say that? Aw, it's just a violation of a principle of least surprise that the (possibly unwitting) ejection of one tape automatically loads the next one. > > > The DLT changer electronics/mechanics are pretty straightforward and are > > unlikely to be affected one way or the other. You may have a task finding > > the right version of amanda that can cope, but that'll be fine. > > The reason I addressed this question to the FreeBSD list is because the > Amanda site specifically says that for changers it is dependent on the > tools in the underlying OS. Well, the amanda package that is appropriate for 2.2.X should give a hint as to what it expects. > > > Whether or > > not the old st driver copes with the DLT4000, who knows... probably. > > > > The drive apparently works for Greg. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Christopher Weimann SysAdmin 400 Higgins Ave > Wall Internet LLC. Brielle NJ, 08730 > Serving almost all of New Jersey 732-223-1777 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 23 20:10:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from benge.graphics.cornell.edu (benge.graphics.cornell.edu [128.84.247.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362C314F42 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 20:10:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mkc@benge.graphics.cornell.edu) Received: from benge.graphics.cornell.edu (mkc@localhost) by benge.graphics.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA76112; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:10:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mkc@benge.graphics.cornell.edu) Message-Id: <199912240410.XAA76112@benge.graphics.cornell.edu> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: "Christopher S. Weimann" , Freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quantum DLT tape library compatibility In-Reply-To: Message from Matthew Jacob of "Thu, 23 Dec 1999 18:40:28 PST." Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:10:07 -0500 From: Mitch Collinsworth Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> > The DLT changer electronics/mechanics are pretty straightforward and are >> > unlikely to be affected one way or the other. You may have a task finding >> > the right version of amanda that can cope, but that'll be fine. >> >> The reason I addressed this question to the FreeBSD list is because the >> Amanda site specifically says that for changers it is dependent on the >> tools in the underlying OS. > >Well, the amanda package that is appropriate for 2.2.X should give a hint >as to what it expects. At the time they wrote that everyone was interfacing amanda to the changer software that came with their individual OS or tape changer or various freeware offerings. Since chg-scsi has been out there's far less reason to try all the choices. I would suggest you start with chg-scsi and a more modern version of FreeBSD. Also, there are a lot of experienced amanda users on the amanda list at amanda-users@amanda.org who can help. Only a couple of whom I've ever seen around here. >> > Whether or >> > not the old st driver copes with the DLT4000, who knows... probably. >> > >> >> The drive apparently works for Greg. Yes but he didn't say with 2.2.7. -Mitch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Dec 23 23:47:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B774715796 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:47:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id SAA23953; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:17:52 +1030 (CST) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:17:52 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: "Christopher S. Weimann" Cc: mjacob@feral.com, Freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quantum DLT tape library compatibility Message-ID: <19991224181752.O1316@freebie.lemis.com> References: <19991224114626.C1316@freebie.lemis.com> <19991223211538.A21605@wallnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <19991223211538.A21605@wallnet.com> WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thursday, 23 December 1999 at 21:15:38 -0500, Christopher S. Weimann wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 05:59:24PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: >> Whether or not the old st driver copes with the DLT4000, who >> knows... probably. > > The drive apparently works for Greg. I'm using it with CAM, not the old st driver. But, as Matt does, I suspect it will work with the old driver. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 24 15:18:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from milkyway.org (lta-r-1.usit.net [205.241.194.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5136614C9A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 15:18:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toby@antares.milkyway.org) Received: from localhost (toby@localhost) by milkyway.org (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id SAA11982 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:11:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:11:50 -0500 (EST) From: Toby Swanson To: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: enabling 16650 buffers Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Posted to questions and got no response so I'll try here (seems in keeping with the charter.) What does one need to do to enable the larger buffers on an I/O card with 16650 UART(s)? I checked various sources and all I found was vague refs to "set flags". I have set the 20000 flag in the kernel config file and the new kernel recognizes the startech 16650 chip. Is this all one needs to do? TIA, Toby To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 24 17:56:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from sprout.seedling.com (sprout.seedling.com [207.8.95.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AAA15047 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 17:56:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brandon@schoolpeople.net) Received: from triangulata (cs9360-51.austin.rr.com [24.93.60.51]) by sprout.seedling.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA04003 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 19:59:31 -0600 Message-ID: <000801bf4db2$18798dc0$333c5d18@austin.rr.com> Reply-To: "Brandon DeYoung" From: "Brandon DeYoung" To: Subject: 36 GB IDE Hard Drives Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:56:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF4D7F.CC6DDA80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF4D7F.CC6DDA80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Are hard drives larger than 32 GB supported by Free BSD. I've had both = the 3.3 and 3.4 releases fail during the make New FS portion of the = install, when installing on a Maxtor 36 GB drive. ~Brandon brandon@schoolpeople.net ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF4D7F.CC6DDA80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Are hard drives larger than 32 GB = supported by=20 Free BSD. I've had both the 3.3 and 3.4 releases fail during the make = New FS=20 portion of the install, when installing on a Maxtor 36 GB = drive.
 
~Brandon
brandon@schoolpeople.net
 
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF4D7F.CC6DDA80-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 24 18: 0:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from tandem.milestonerdl.com (tandem.milestonerdl.com [204.107.138.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0707A15875 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:00:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marc@tandem.milestonerdl.com) Received: from localhost (marc@localhost) by tandem.milestonerdl.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA94488; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 21:19:12 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 21:19:12 -0600 (CST) From: marc rassbach To: Brandon DeYoung Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 36 GB IDE Hard Drives In-Reply-To: <000801bf4db2$18798dc0$333c5d18@austin.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This seems to be a hardware problem. If you go to maxtor's site http://www.maxtor.com/technology/infobulls/13027.html they mention how older BIOSes are non-functional. I just decided to use IBM 25 gig drives and live with that. :-) On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Brandon DeYoung wrote: > Are hard drives larger than 32 GB supported by Free BSD. I've had both the 3.3 and 3.4 releases fail during the make New FS portion of the install, when installing on a Maxtor 36 GB drive. > > ~Brandon > brandon@schoolpeople.net > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 24 18:11:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (castles551.castles.com [208.214.165.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F55514D5D for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:11:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA17428; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:15:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199912250215.SAA17428@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Brandon DeYoung" Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 36 GB IDE Hard Drives In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:56:27 CST." <000801bf4db2$18798dc0$333c5d18@austin.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:15:39 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Are hard drives larger than 32 GB supported by Free BSD. I've had both = > the 3.3 and 3.4 releases fail during the make New FS portion of the = > install, when installing on a Maxtor 36 GB drive. There shouldn't be any issues with large drives, no. Since you don't provide any details to qualify "fail", it's hard to guess where your problems might lie. (The 'BIOS' supposition already aired seems fairly unlikely, since FreeBSD doesn't use the BIOS at the point you're discussing.) -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 24 18:38:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B591502E for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:38:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo [192.67.166.79]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA28679; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:40:23 -0800 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:40:22 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Brandon DeYoung Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 36 GB IDE Hard Drives In-Reply-To: <000801bf4db2$18798dc0$333c5d18@austin.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org See kern/15611- Wes Bauske has seen the very same thing... I have a 50GB drive I'll try on Sunday... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 24 20:17:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from benge.graphics.cornell.edu (benge.graphics.cornell.edu [128.84.247.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E01714FFB; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 20:17:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mkc@benge.graphics.cornell.edu) Received: from benge.graphics.cornell.edu (mkc@localhost) by benge.graphics.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA78976; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 23:16:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mkc@benge.graphics.cornell.edu) Message-Id: <199912250416.XAA78976@benge.graphics.cornell.edu> To: Mike Smith Cc: "Brandon DeYoung" , freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 36 GB IDE Hard Drives In-Reply-To: Message from Mike Smith of "Fri, 24 Dec 1999 18:15:39 PST." <199912250215.SAA17428@mass.cdrom.com> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 23:16:54 -0500 From: Mitch Collinsworth Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> Are hard drives larger than 32 GB supported by Free BSD. I've had both = >> the 3.3 and 3.4 releases fail during the make New FS portion of the = >> install, when installing on a Maxtor 36 GB drive. > >There shouldn't be any issues with large drives, no. Since you don't >provide any details to qualify "fail", it's hard to guess where your >problems might lie. There's been discussion of this recently, I think on -questions. Those involved seemed to agree there is a newfs barrier at around 27 to 27.5 GB. Smaller works fine, larger fails. Based on that you should be able to partition your 36 GB and make it usable now. IIRC there is a new driver in the works that's supposed to solve the problem. -Mitch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Dec 24 21:39:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from schooner.svjava.com (schooner.svjava.com [204.75.228.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6888F14F47 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 21:39:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kozowski@svjava.com) Received: (from kozowski@localhost) by schooner.svjava.com (8.9.1a/svjava.com) id VAA15803; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 21:39:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 21:39:40 -0800 From: Eric Kozowski To: marc rassbach Cc: Brandon DeYoung , freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 36 GB IDE Hard Drives Message-ID: <19991224213939.A15752@schooner.svjava.com> References: <000801bf4db2$18798dc0$333c5d18@austin.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.7i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 09:19:12PM -0600, marc rassbach wrote: > This seems to be a hardware problem. If you go to maxtor's site > http://www.maxtor.com/technology/infobulls/13027.html > they mention how older BIOSes are non-functional. i ran into the same problem w/ a maxtor 36gb ide drive under 3.4-stable. i upgraded my bios per maxtor's instructions, but it still wouldn't format. i ended up creating two partitions. > On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Brandon DeYoung wrote: > > > Are hard drives larger than 32 GB supported by Free BSD. I've had both the 3.3 and 3.4 releases fail during the make New FS portion of the install, when installing on a Maxtor 36 GB drive. > > > > ~Brandon > > brandon@schoolpeople.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Dec 25 15:51: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC14214E6C for ; Sat, 25 Dec 1999 15:50:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id KAA36141; Sun, 26 Dec 1999 10:21:12 +1030 (CST) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 10:21:11 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Eric Kozowski Cc: marc rassbach , Brandon DeYoung , freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 36 GB IDE Hard Drives Message-ID: <19991226102111.F1316@freebie.lemis.com> References: <000801bf4db2$18798dc0$333c5d18@austin.rr.com> <19991224213939.A15752@schooner.svjava.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <19991224213939.A15752@schooner.svjava.com> WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] On Friday, 24 December 1999 at 21:39:40 -0800, Eric Kozowski wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 09:19:12PM -0600, marc rassbach wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Brandon DeYoung wrote: >>> Are hard drives larger than 32 GB supported by Free BSD. I've had >>> both the 3.3 and 3.4 releases fail during the make New FS portion >>> of the install, when installing on a Maxtor 36 GB drive. >> >> This seems to be a hardware problem. If you go to maxtor's site >> http://www.maxtor.com/technology/infobulls/13027.html >> they mention how older BIOSes are non-functional. > > i ran into the same problem w/ a maxtor 36gb ide drive under > 3.4-stable. i upgraded my bios per maxtor's instructions, but it > still wouldn't format. I don't know how you can determine that this is the "same problem". There are almost no details of what happened. The BIOS upgrade wouldn't make any difference, since FreeBSD doesn't use the BIOS. I'm currently investigating some reported problems in this area. Specifically, ufs file systems of 27.5 GB and up have been reported to fail to create file systems. On one occasion, newfs reported that the file system was read only. In another case, the newfs completed, but the system paniced writing to the file system. It would be nice to know what *really* happened to each of you. Greg -- When replying to this message, please take care not to mutilate the original text. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/email.html Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Dec 25 15:52:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7412D14BFE; Sat, 25 Dec 1999 15:52:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id KAA36165; Sun, 26 Dec 1999 10:22:39 +1030 (CST) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 10:22:39 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Mitch Collinsworth Cc: Mike Smith , Brandon DeYoung , freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 36 GB IDE Hard Drives Message-ID: <19991226102238.G1316@freebie.lemis.com> References: <199912250416.XAA78976@benge.graphics.cornell.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <199912250416.XAA78976@benge.graphics.cornell.edu> WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Friday, 24 December 1999 at 23:16:54 -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > >>> Are hard drives larger than 32 GB supported by Free BSD. I've had both = >>> the 3.3 and 3.4 releases fail during the make New FS portion of the = >>> install, when installing on a Maxtor 36 GB drive. >> >> There shouldn't be any issues with large drives, no. Since you don't >> provide any details to qualify "fail", it's hard to guess where your >> problems might lie. > > There's been discussion of this recently, I think on -questions. > Those involved seemed to agree there is a newfs barrier at around > 27 to 27.5 GB. Smaller works fine, larger fails. Based on that you > should be able to partition your 36 GB and make it usable now. IIRC > there is a new driver in the works that's supposed to solve the > problem. Correct. That's a thing I forgot to mention in my last message: we've tried the new ata driver with large disks and had no problems. That doesn't mean there are none, though: until we know what causes the problems, we can't be sure that they're gone. ata is standard in 4.0. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Dec 25 20:55:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from schooner.svjava.com (schooner.svjava.com [204.75.228.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F5B15077 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 1999 20:55:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kozowski@svjava.com) Received: (from kozowski@localhost) by schooner.svjava.com (8.9.1a/svjava.com) id UAA22576; Sat, 25 Dec 1999 20:55:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 25 Dec 1999 20:55:40 -0800 From: Eric Kozowski To: Greg Lehey Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 36 GB IDE Hard Drives Message-ID: <19991225205540.A22423@schooner.svjava.com> References: <000801bf4db2$18798dc0$333c5d18@austin.rr.com> <19991224213939.A15752@schooner.svjava.com> <19991226102111.F1316@freebie.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.7i In-Reply-To: <19991226102111.F1316@freebie.lemis.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Dec 26, 1999 at 10:21:11AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > I don't know how you can determine that this is the "same problem". s/same/similar/ > There are almost no details of what happened. The BIOS upgrade > wouldn't make any difference, since FreeBSD doesn't use the BIOS. right, but the maxtor site says some of it's 36gb drives have problems w/ older bios that cause formats to fail. http://www.maxtor.com/technology/infobulls/13027.html > I'm currently investigating some reported problems in this area. > Specifically, ufs file systems of 27.5 GB and up have been reported to > fail to create file systems. On one occasion, newfs reported that the > file system was read only. In another case, the newfs completed, but > the system paniced writing to the file system. It would be nice to > know what *really* happened to each of you. newfs croaked w/ the read only error. i tried using both the tools in /stand/sysinstall and the equivalent cli commands. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message