From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 8 12: 7:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.az.home.com (ha1.rdc1.az.home.com [24.1.240.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34C314D53; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 12:07:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from elgreen@iname.com) Received: from ehome.local.net ([24.9.114.169]) by mail.rdc1.az.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <19990808190544.FZGW27077.mail.rdc1.az.home.com@ehome.local.net>; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 12:05:44 -0700 From: Eric Lee Green Organization: Myself @ Home To: Doug Subject: Re: More on receiver lockups Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 12:00:21 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG References: <37ACA0E3.7064314B@gorean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99080812061000.00360@ehome.local.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 07 Aug 1999, Doug wrote: > Eric Lee Green wrote: > > > Well, I cvsup'ed "stable" (just the kernel) > > I'm glad it worked for you this time, but I can't let this pass without a > warning. It's a very bad idea to upgrade your source then build just the > kernel. You should always make world first to avoid possible > incompatabilities between the kernel and your userland programs. Hmm, is the kernel in "stable" going to change enough for this to be a big deal? I know that if you don't do "make world" in "current" you're likely to bomb big-time, but I thought "stable" was, well, stable, and the changes in the kernel would be like the changes from 2.0.36 to 2.0.37 Linux kernel, i.e. updates, some minor functionality fixes, but no big changes to existing functionality. I didn't do a "make world" because I didn't cvsup the world, I just cvsup'ed the kernel, due to lack of time, lack of bandwidth, and overcrowded cvsup servers. I will set a cvsup going this AM out of my crontab, I guess, and go ahead and update the rest of my "stable"... -- Eric Lee Green http://members.tripod.com/e_l_green mail: e_l_green@hotmail.com ^^^^^^^ Burdening Microsoft with SPAM! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 8 12:45:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D38A14BE5 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 12:45:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Received: from lithium.scientia.demon.co.uk ([192.168.2.2] ident=exim) by scientia.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.024 #3) id 11DWmg-0001uZ-00; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 18:30:58 +0100 Received: (from ben) by lithium.scientia.demon.co.uk (Exim 3.024 #3) id 11DWmh-00017Q-00; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 18:30:59 +0100 Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 18:30:59 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst To: Shaun Jurrens Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed0 or ed1? Message-ID: <19990808183059.A4209@lithium.scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <19990808024626.B372@dakota.shamz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <19990808024626.B372@dakota.shamz.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Shaun Jurrens wrote: > Ahh, guys, the ed driver is a isa driver. Really? root@magnesium:~# dmesg | grep ed1 ed1: rev 0x00 int a irq 11 on pci0.12.0 ed1: address 00:e0:7d:81:87:27, type NE2000 (16 bit) Maybe it was designed to be an ISA driver, but it certainly supports this PCI card. > Confer with the man page [man 4 ed] You should use the rl driver [rl0 > in this case] If the ed driver works, why should I change? If the rl driver is faster, that's a good enough reason (provided CPU utilization doesn't also go through the roof). I may try rl though, and compare speeds. -- Ben Smithurst | PGP: 0x99392F7D ben@scientia.demon.co.uk | key available from keyservers and | ben+pgp@scientia.demon.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 8 15:18: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from cheddar.netmonger.net (cheddar.netmonger.net [209.54.21.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9B914CA9 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 15:18:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@cheddar.netmonger.net) Received: (from chris@localhost) by cheddar.netmonger.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA02829; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 18:16:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19990808181617.A2611@netmonger.net> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 18:16:18 -0400 From: Christopher Masto To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: I'm confused (netstat/routing) Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It's been a long week, but I don't think I've lost that many brain cells. Why is this entry in the routing table not showing up with netstat? chris@riboflavin:~$ route -n get 209.54.22.3 route to: 209.54.22.3 destination: 209.54.22.3 gateway: 209.54.21.198 interface: ep0 flags: recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msec rttvar hopcount mtu expire 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 3263 chris@riboflavin:~$ netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 209.54.21.129 UGSc 2 62 ep0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 6 lo0 209.54.21 link#2 UC 0 0 ep0 209.54.21.129 0:d0:79:ac:ec:0 UHLW 2 12 ep0 190 209.54.21.131 0:c0:5:1:7c:c2 UHLW 0 0 ep0 1165 209.54.21.140 0:60:97:a3:64:43 UHLW 2 6180287 ep0 964 209.54.21.141 0:60:97:6b:71:2f UHLW 6 517596 ep0 1032 209.54.21.144 0:60:97:a3:63:e4 UHLW 1 2130968 lo0 209.54.21.160 0:60:61:1:5:e1 UHLW 0 0 ep0 1193 209.54.21.181 0:60:97:a3:64:43 UHLW 0 88 ep0 137 209.54.21.198 0:60:67:0:2a:35 UHLW 1 16 ep0 820 209.54.21.199 0:60:97:a3:63:e6 UHLW 2 181354 ep0 1192 209.54.21.237 0:40:95:0:1c:9c UHLW 0 4 ep0 532 209.54.21.241 link#2 UHLW 1 24 ep0 209.54.21.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 0 1 ep0 This machine is a bit old (FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Nov 4 18:19:29 EST 1998).. was there a bug somewhere, or am I just missing something? -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 8 17:39:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05ACA14E23 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 17:39:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.1/frmug-2.3/nospam) with UUCP id CAA00667 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 02:37:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id 711698711; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 02:07:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 02:07:54 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm confused (netstat/routing) Message-ID: <19990809020754.A25274@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <19990808181617.A2611@netmonger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <19990808181617.A2611@netmonger.net>; from Christopher Masto on Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 06:16:18PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF ctm#5543 AMD-K6 MMX @ 200 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Christopher Masto: > It's been a long week, but I don't think I've lost that many brain cells. > Why is this entry in the routing table not showing up with netstat? Because it is on a different subnet and going through your defautl route (just guessing) ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #73: Sat Jul 31 15:36:05 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 8 17:40:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE1014E23 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 17:40:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA17281; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 20:38:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 20:38:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199908090038.UAA17281@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Christopher Masto Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: I'm confused (netstat/routing) In-Reply-To: <19990808181617.A2611@netmonger.net> References: <19990808181617.A2611@netmonger.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > It's been a long week, but I don't think I've lost that many brain cells. > Why is this entry in the routing table not showing up with netstat? > flags: > chris@riboflavin:~$ netstat -nr If you wish routes of this flavor to show up in `netstat -r' output, you must supply the `-a' flag as well. wollman@khavrinen$ netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 18.24.4.1 UGSc 12 11589 fxp0 18.24.4/24 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 18.24.4.1 0:e0:2b:b:17:0 UHLW 11 53 fxp0 952 18.24.4.11 0:a0:c9:6:90:1c UHLW 0 189 fxp0 1168 18.24.4.47 0:a0:c9:6:95:48 UHLW 1 3015 fxp0 1019 18.24.4.193 0:a0:c9:3c:76:5c UHLW 8 14263893 lo0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 7763879 lo0 wollman@khavrinen$ netstat -ran Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 18.24.4.1 UGSc 12 11589 fxp0 18.23.23.23 18.24.4.1 UGHW 2 69362 fxp0 18.24.0.128 18.24.4.1 UGHW 1 6159 fxp0 18.24.4/24 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 18.24.4.1 0:e0:2b:b:17:0 UHLW 11 53 fxp0 950 18.24.4.11 0:a0:c9:6:90:1c UHLW 0 189 fxp0 1166 18.24.4.47 0:a0:c9:6:95:48 UHLW 1 3015 fxp0 1017 18.24.4.193 0:a0:c9:3c:76:5c UHLW 8 14263893 lo0 18.24.7.1 18.24.4.1 UGHW 1 10499 fxp0 18.24.10.4 18.24.4.1 UGHW 2 1661 fxp0 18.24.10.20 18.24.4.1 UGHW 5 76340 fxp0 18.24.10.177 18.24.4.1 UGHW 1 3733 fxp0 18.111.0.152 18.24.4.1 UGHW 1 6857 fxp0 18.111.0.200 18.24.4.1 UGHW 1 4 fxp0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 7763895 lo0 153.39.194.10 18.24.4.1 UGHW 1 11589 fxp0 204.216.27.18 18.24.4.1 UGHW 2 19211 fxp0 This is a feature. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 8 18: 6:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from cheddar.netmonger.net (cheddar.netmonger.net [209.54.21.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD90514D5D for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 18:06:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@cheddar.netmonger.net) Received: (from chris@localhost) by cheddar.netmonger.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA10074; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 21:04:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19990808210440.A9827@netmonger.net> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 21:04:40 -0400 From: Christopher Masto To: Garrett Wollman Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'm confused (netstat/routing) Mail-Followup-To: Garrett Wollman , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <19990808181617.A2611@netmonger.net> <199908090038.UAA17281@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199908090038.UAA17281@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from Garrett Wollman on Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 08:38:32PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 08:38:32PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > If you wish routes of this flavor to show up in `netstat -r' output, > you must supply the `-a' flag as well. [...] > This is a feature. It's an undocumented feature. It's very heavily undocumented, even: netstat [-bdghimnrs] [-f address_family] [-M core] [-N system] Someone should document it before it gets mistaken for a bug and removed. -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 8 18:11:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from cheddar.netmonger.net (cheddar.netmonger.net [209.54.21.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF97814BE2 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 18:11:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@cheddar.netmonger.net) Received: (from chris@localhost) by cheddar.netmonger.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA10255; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 21:09:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19990808210931.A10078@netmonger.net> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 21:09:31 -0400 From: Christopher Masto To: Ollivier Robert , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'm confused (netstat/routing) Mail-Followup-To: Ollivier Robert , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <19990808181617.A2611@netmonger.net> <19990809020754.A25274@keltia.freenix.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <19990809020754.A25274@keltia.freenix.fr>; from Ollivier Robert on Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 02:07:54AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 02:07:54AM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Christopher Masto: > > It's been a long week, but I don't think I've lost that many brain cells. > > Why is this entry in the routing table not showing up with netstat? > > Because it is on a different subnet and going through your defautl > route (just guessing) ? If it were going through the default route, it wouldn't have said: route to: 209.54.22.3 destination: 209.54.22.3 gateway: 209.54.21.198 Mr. Wollman had the answer. And had it been in the man page, I wouldn't have had to ask. -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 9 1:14:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from king.ukrnet.net (king.ukrnet.net [212.26.128.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649D015169; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 01:14:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnut@fc.kiev.ua) Received: from fc.kiev.ua (uucp@localhost) by king.ukrnet.net (8.8.8-MVC-221297/8.8.8) with UUCP id LAA04795; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 11:10:58 +0300 Received: from blend.fc.kiev.ua (blend.fc.kiev.ua [192.168.5.17]) by indust.fc.kiev.ua (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA44809; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 11:10:19 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from gnut@fc.kiev.ua) Received: from gnut.fc.kiev.ua (gnut.fc.kiev.ua [192.168.5.29]) by blend.fc.kiev.ua (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA77679; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 11:08:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from gnut@fc.kiev.ua) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 11:08:59 +0300 From: "Oles' Hnatkevych" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.34a) S/N 91302521 Reply-To: "Oles' Hnatkevych" Organization: Finance & Credit Banking Corporation X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <11464.990809@fc.kiev.ua> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: IP-in-IP encapsulation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello freebsd-questions, Sorry for repeating the question. I look for a software that will allow me to encapsulate a raw ip packet into another raw ip packet with a certain source and destination addresses, without any encryption etc. Please help me! Thank you! Best regards, Oles' mailto:gnut@fc.kiev.ua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 9 4:27:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC3515279 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 04:26:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.1/frmug-2.3/nospam) with UUCP id NAA25964 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:23:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id 53C8F8711; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:11:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:11:48 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'm confused (netstat/routing) Message-ID: <19990809131148.A30992@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <19990808181617.A2611@netmonger.net> <199908090038.UAA17281@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19990808210440.A9827@netmonger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <19990808210440.A9827@netmonger.net>; from Christopher Masto on Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 09:04:40PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF ctm#5543 AMD-K6 MMX @ 200 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Christopher Masto: > netstat [-bdghimnrs] [-f address_family] [-M core] [-N system] > > Someone should document it before it gets mistaken for a bug and > removed. It is documented in CURRENT: usage: netstat [-Aan] [-f address_family] [-M core] [-N system] netstat [-bdghimnrs] [-f address_family] [-M core] [-N system] netstat [-bdn] [-I interface] [-M core] [-N system] [-w wait] netstat [-M core] [-N system] [-p protocol] netstat(1): -a With the default display, show the state of all sockets; normally sockets used by server processes are not shown. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #73: Sat Jul 31 15:36:05 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 9 4:27:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2D7152A0 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 04:26:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.1/frmug-2.3/nospam) with UUCP id NAA25968 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:24:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id 723C98711; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:16:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:16:09 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'm confused (netstat/routing) Message-ID: <19990809131609.B30992@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <19990808181617.A2611@netmonger.net> <199908090038.UAA17281@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19990808210440.A9827@netmonger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <19990808210440.A9827@netmonger.net>; from Christopher Masto on Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 09:04:40PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF ctm#5543 AMD-K6 MMX @ 200 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Christopher Masto: > It's an undocumented feature. It's very heavily undocumented, even: > > netstat [-bdghimnrs] [-f address_family] [-M core] [-N system] I checked RELENG_3, it has the same usage string as CURRENT. Which FreeBSD or netstat are you running ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #73: Sat Jul 31 15:36:05 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 9 5:11: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D2A14E18; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 05:10:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA94109; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:07:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02168; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:09:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199908091209.NAA02168@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Oles' Hnatkevych" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IP-in-IP encapsulation In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Aug 1999 11:08:59 +0300." <11464.990809@fc.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 13:09:38 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Hello freebsd-questions, > > Sorry for repeating the question. > > I look for a software that will allow me to encapsulate a raw ip > packet into another raw ip packet with a certain source and > destination addresses, without any encryption etc. > > Please help me! > > Thank you! nos-tun(8) may do the job. What are you trying to do ? Create a tunnel ? > Best regards, > Oles' mailto:gnut@fc.kiev.ua -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 9 5:12:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from ns.i.cz (ns.i.cz [193.85.255.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73AD151F5 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 05:12:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mm@i.cz) Received: from woody.i.cz (woody.i.cz [193.85.255.60]) by ns.i.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC0636409 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 14:10:12 +0200 (CEST) Content-Length: 762 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19990809131148.A30992@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:10:12 +0200 (MET DST) Reply-To: mm@i.cz From: Martin Machacek To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm confused (netstat/routing) Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 09-Aug-99 Ollivier Robert wrote: > It is documented in CURRENT: Well, IMHO the documentation is incomplete.. > usage: netstat [-Aan] [-f address_family] [-M core] [-N system] > netstat [-bdghimnrs] [-f address_family] [-M core] [-N system] > netstat [-bdn] [-I interface] [-M core] [-N system] [-w wait] > netstat [-M core] [-N system] [-p protocol] > > netstat(1): > > -a With the default display, show the state of all sockets; normally > sockets used by server processes are not shown. This description of the -a flag says completely nothing about having any kind of influence on listing of routing table, or does it? Or is it just lack of understanding on my side? Martin --- [PGP KeyID F3F409C4] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Aug 9 20:52:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mgo.iij.ad.jp (mgo.iij.ad.jp [202.232.15.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2645E14DA6 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 20:52:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kazu@iijlab.net) Received: from ns.iij.ad.jp (root@ns.iij.ad.jp [192.168.2.8]) by mgo.iij.ad.jp (8.8.8/MGO1.0) with ESMTP id MAA21696 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 12:50:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from fs.iij.ad.jp (root@fs.iij.ad.jp [192.168.2.9]) by ns.iij.ad.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl7) with ESMTP id MAA27861 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 12:50:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (mine.iij.ad.jp [192.168.10.205]) by fs.iij.ad.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl7) with ESMTP id MAA17989 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 12:50:19 +0900 (JST) To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: KAME stable release 19990809 From: core@kame.net X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94b47 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19990810124940D.kazu@iijlab.net> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 12:49:40 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990731(IM118) Lines: 64 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org As usual, KAME Project has released "stable" packages of IPv6/IPsec network code for FreeBSD 2.2.8/3.2, NetBSD 1.4, and BSD/OS 3.1. These packages are free of charge but absolutely no warranty. They are avaiable from the following web site: http://www.kame.net/ NOTE: IF YOU GAIN ACCESS TO THIS WEB PAGE OVER IPv6, THE TURTLE WILL DANCE. The changes from the previous official release are shown below. These packages have been tested by the TAHI team(http://www.tahi.org). --KAME Project ---from here Here are summary of recent changes prior to this STABLE kit (19990802). <> <> - More spec-conformant source address selection for NA output. - ND6 IsRouter behavior against redirect packet is fixed. - On router, ND6 code wrongly generated too many redirects toward source. It is now fixed. - NetBSD now uses single source code for tcp4/6. - IPv6 path mtu discovery for NetBSD. - Kernel data structure for prefix management is splitted to router (advertise) side and host (receive) side. <> - Partly sync'ed to new advanced API, 2292bis. - IPV6_CKSUM now works correctly against jumbograms. <> - New IPsec policy engine on all the platforms. - IPv4 tunnel/transport mode, and IPv6 tunnel/transport mode can be generated. IPv6 tunnel mode cannot be imposed on a packet forwarding case at this moment so there's no router use for it, though. - IPsec code was too strict about SA direction (inbound, outbound or bidirectional). - Separated IPSEC_ESP from IPSEC kernel config option for countries where crypto export is restricted (for example, united states). - IPComp (IP payload compression) support. <> - rtsol: timing parameter fixed to conform to ND6 draft. - bgpd: properly handle an empty AS path. - ftp: protection against bogus return code from some of ftp daemons. - pim6dd: filtering (configured pruning) of multicast routing-capable interfaces. - Various additions, such as pim6sd (PIM multicast routing on IPv6, sparse mode), tftp/tftpd on NetBSD, and so forth. - net.inet6.ip6.kame_version sysctl MIB (which shows the KAME version you are using). <> - ATM PVC pseudo interface support in KAME/NetBSD. - ALTQ is upgraded. - ports/pkgsrc: upgraded base version for many items in the collection. - ports/pkgsrc additions: pfs, rsync - ports/pkgsrc removals: IM ---to here To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 10 15: 9:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F3314D41 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 15:09:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kwc@world.std.com) Received: from world.std.com (root@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA15046 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 18:09:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by world.std.com (TheWorld/Spike-2.0) id AA20326; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 18:08:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 18:08:38 -0400 From: kwc@world.std.com (Kenneth W Cochran) Message-Id: <199908102208.AA20326@world.std.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Kernel ppp (pppd) newer than ver 2.3.5 in -STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -STABLE Subject: Kernel ppp (pppd) version 2.3.5 --> 2.3.8 (Slightly edited from original sent to -stable...) What is the "status" of pppd more recent than 2.3.5 (2.3.8, for example) making it into -STABLE (RELENG_3)? I've also noticed a 2.3.9 rev now in beta. Not a show-stopper, but I get a strange "received bad configure-nak/rej" (at LOG_ERR level while trying to negotiate CCP) every time I connect. I do not get this behavior under Linux (Slackware 4.0/kernel 2.2.10/pppd-2.3.7) & I don't recall getting it under Linux with previous versions of pppd going back as far as 2.3.5 & 2.2.0f. IIRC the Linux version "properly" rejects the CCP negotiation(s) it doesn't like... :) According to the pppd-2.3.8 sources, it has been updated for FreeBSD 3.0 (& 3.1?). I suppose I could install it "manually" but I'm not (yet) keen on messing with the source tree, especially that of the kernel (ie. I don't want to mess-up the cvsup procedure). It also appears that there are differences between the kernel portions in the kernel source tree & those in pppd-2.3.8 (some are "older," some "newer"). Interesting... Is this worth filing a pr? Thanks, -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 10 19:44:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 59DD614E2B; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B94C1CD7BC; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:44:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:44:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Kenneth W Cochran Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel ppp (pppd) newer than ver 2.3.5 in -STABLE In-Reply-To: <199908102208.AA20326@world.std.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > What is the "status" of pppd more recent than 2.3.5 (2.3.8, for > example) making it into -STABLE (RELENG_3)? I've also noticed a > 2.3.9 rev now in beta. I have it integrated in my local source tree, although I haven't yet had time to test it. My computer is still in Australia as I speak; I'm in LA, and it'll be a few weeks before I can get it shipped over. Note that the FreeBSD 3.x patches in the distribution are partially b0rked - they seem to try and provide support for synchronous devices using nonexistent ioctls. I haven't yet contacted the patch author about this. From memory, I think the only changes between 2.3.8 and the 2.3.9 prerelease were non-freebsd specific. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 11 8: 2:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from sol.microgate.com (www.microgate.com [216.30.46.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B9E15027; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:02:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paulkf@microgate.com) Received: from diemos (diemos.microgate.com [192.168.0.12]) by sol.microgate.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA19225; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:03:49 -0500 Message-ID: <000e01bee40a$7bebcf10$0c00a8c0@microgate.com> From: "Paul Fulghum" To: "Kris Kennaway" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Kernel ppp (pppd) newer than ver 2.3.5 in -STABLE Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:02:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01BEE3E0.9302B440" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01BEE3E0.9302B440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kris Kennaway > On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > > > What is the "status" of pppd more recent than 2.3.5 (2.3.8, for > > example) making it into -STABLE (RELENG_3)? I've also noticed a > > 2.3.9 rev now in beta. > > I have it integrated in my local source tree, although I haven't yet had > time to test it. My computer is still in Australia as I speak; I'm in LA, > and it'll be a few weeks before I can get it shipped over. > > Note that the FreeBSD 3.x patches in the distribution are partially b0rked > - they seem to try and provide support for synchronous devices using > nonexistent ioctls. I haven't yet contacted the patch author about this. > > From memory, I think the only changes between 2.3.8 and the 2.3.9 > prerelease were non-freebsd specific. > > Kris Kris: I am the author of the kernel patches for 3.0/3.1. The changes to add sync support work with a driver for our sync adapter. The driver install included a patch that added the new IOCTL call. This should have been included with the ppp kernel patches. I created, tested and attached a patch against ppp-2.3.8 that adds the IOCTL patch (ttycom.h) to the ppp-2.3.8 kernel install. I will also forward this patch to Paul Mackerras for inclusion with the ppp package. The original intent was to add these patches and our driver to freebsd, such that the kernel install would not be necessary for 3.2+, but all of my submissions and queries have been pretty much ignored. (Poul-Henning Kamp said he would look into it, but that was some time ago). So until there is some way to submit drivers for inclusion with FreeBSD, the patches remain the only alternative. Paul Fulghum paulkf@microgate.com Microgate Corporation www.microgate.com 9501 Capital of Texas Hwy Austin, Texas 78759 (512)-345-7791 ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01BEE3E0.9302B440 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="patch.ppp-2.3.8-mg1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch.ppp-2.3.8-mg1" diff -u -r -N ppp-2.3.8/freebsd-3.0/kinstall.sh = ppp-2.3.8-new/freebsd-3.0/kinstall.sh=0A= --- ppp-2.3.8/freebsd-3.0/kinstall.sh Wed May 12 05:05:47 1999=0A= +++ ppp-2.3.8-new/freebsd-3.0/kinstall.sh Wed Aug 11 09:30:52 1999=0A= @@ -7,7 +7,10 @@=0A= # Most of the kernel files are already part of the kernel source=0A= # but, this updates them for synchronous HDLC operation=0A= #=0A= -# Paul Fulghum 19-Apr-99=0A= +# Paul Fulghum paulkf@microgate.com August 11, 1999=0A= +#=0A= +# 990911 - Added patch for ttycom.h that defines new IOCTL for sync = support.=0A= +# =0A= =0A= KPATH=3D$(uname -v | sed 's/.*://')=0A= CONF=3D$(echo $KPATH | sed 's;.*compile/;;')=0A= @@ -42,8 +45,56 @@=0A= fi=0A= done=0A= =0A= +# Patch files in /usr/src/sys/sys=0A= +=0A= +for f in ttycom.h ; do=0A= + dest=3D$SYS/sys/$f=0A= + patch=3D$SRC/patch.$f=0A= + if [ -f $dest ]; then=0A= + echo -n "Patching $dest..."=0A= + if patch -s -C -N $dest < $patch 2> /dev/null; then=0A= + patch -s -N $dest < $patch=0A= + echo "successful."=0A= + DOMAKE=3Dyes=0A= + else=0A= + if patch -s -C -R $dest < $patch 2> /dev/null; then=0A= + echo "already applied."=0A= + else=0A= + echo "failed (incorrect version or already applied)."=0A= + fi=0A= + fi=0A= + else=0A= + echo "Warning, file $dest not found"=0A= + fi=0A= +done=0A= +=0A= +# Patch files in /usr/include/net=0A= +=0A= for f in if_ppp.h ; do=0A= dest=3D/usr/include/net/$f=0A= + patch=3D$SRC/patch.$f=0A= + if [ -f $dest ]; then=0A= + echo -n "Patching $dest..."=0A= + if patch -s -C -N $dest < $patch 2> /dev/null; then=0A= + patch -s -N $dest < $patch=0A= + echo "successful."=0A= + DOMAKE=3Dyes=0A= + else=0A= + if patch -s -C -R $dest < $patch 2> /dev/null; then=0A= + echo "already applied."=0A= + else=0A= + echo "failed (incorrect version or already applied)."=0A= + fi=0A= + fi=0A= + else=0A= + echo "Warning, file $dest not found"=0A= + fi=0A= +done=0A= +=0A= +# Patch files in /usr/include/sys=0A= +=0A= +for f in ttycom.h ; do=0A= + dest=3D/usr/include/sys/$f=0A= patch=3D$SRC/patch.$f=0A= if [ -f $dest ]; then=0A= echo -n "Patching $dest..."=0A= diff -u -r -N ppp-2.3.8/freebsd-3.0/patch.ttycom.h = ppp-2.3.8-new/freebsd-3.0/patch.ttycom.h=0A= --- ppp-2.3.8/freebsd-3.0/patch.ttycom.h Wed Dec 31 18:00:00 1969=0A= +++ ppp-2.3.8-new/freebsd-3.0/patch.ttycom.h Wed Aug 11 09:07:37 1999=0A= @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@=0A= +--- ttycom.h Mon Jun 17 08:08:09 1996=0A= ++++ ttycom.h.new Fri Apr 9 08:22:06 1999=0A= +@@ -133,9 +133,13 @@=0A= + #define TIOCDSIMICROCODE _IO('t', 85) /* download microcode to=0A= + * DSI Softmodem */=0A= + =0A= ++#define TIOCRCVFRAME _IOW('t', 69, struct mbuf *) /* data frame = received */=0A= ++#define TIOCXMTFRAME _IOW('t', 68, struct mbuf *) /* data frame = transmit */=0A= ++=0A= + #define TTYDISC 0 /* termios tty line discipline */=0A= + #define TABLDISC 3 /* tablet discipline */=0A= + #define SLIPDISC 4 /* serial IP discipline */=0A= + #define PPPDISC 5 /* PPP discipline */=0A= ++#define HDLCDISC 6 /* HDLC discipline */=0A= + =0A= + #endif /* !_SYS_TTYCOM_H_ */=0A= ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01BEE3E0.9302B440-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 11 8:59:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 1CE0B14E97; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9501CD689; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:59:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:59:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Fulghum Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel ppp (pppd) newer than ver 2.3.5 in -STABLE In-Reply-To: <000e01bee40a$7bebcf10$0c00a8c0@microgate.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Paul Fulghum wrote: > Kris: > > I am the author of the kernel patches for 3.0/3.1. The changes to add sync > support work with a driver for our sync adapter. The driver install included > a patch that added the new IOCTL call. This should have been included with > the ppp kernel patches. > > I created, tested and attached a patch against ppp-2.3.8 that adds the > IOCTL patch (ttycom.h) to the ppp-2.3.8 kernel install. I will also forward > this > patch to Paul Mackerras for inclusion with the ppp package. Thanks, I'll see how it goes with the patch applied. > The original intent was to add these patches and our driver to freebsd, > such that the kernel install would not be necessary for 3.2+, > but all of my submissions and queries have been pretty much ignored. > (Poul-Henning Kamp said he would look into it, but that was some time ago). > So until there is some way to submit drivers for inclusion with FreeBSD, > the patches remain the only alternative. PR kern/11235 states that phk would attach your patches to the PR when he received them - has he received them but not done so? An addendum to the PR describing exactly what your driver implements would increase its chances of being added. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 11 19: 9:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from dt011n65.san.rr.com (dt011n65.san.rr.com [204.210.13.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDDB1517C; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:09:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt011n65.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA73486; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:09:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <37B22CDA.6D0BC5FA@gorean.org> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:09:30 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT-0730 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Lee Green Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More on receiver lockups References: <37ACA0E3.7064314B@gorean.org> <99080812061000.00360@ehome.local.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Eric Lee Green wrote: > > On Sat, 07 Aug 1999, Doug wrote: > > Eric Lee Green wrote: > > > > > Well, I cvsup'ed "stable" (just the kernel) > > > > I'm glad it worked for you this time, but I can't let this pass without a > > warning. It's a very bad idea to upgrade your source then build just the > > kernel. You should always make world first to avoid possible > > incompatabilities between the kernel and your userland programs. > > Hmm, is the kernel in "stable" going to change enough for this to be a big > deal? In general? No. If you are following the -stable mailing list you should be in good shape. However you have to balance the number of times such breakage is going to occur, and the concurrent inconvenience vs. the inconvenience of doing the make world (which is really small once you get into a rythm with it). Of course, it's your decision ultimately, I just didn't want any new users reading your post to get the idea that upgrading kernel without upgrading userland too was the "right" way to do it. Good luck, Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 11 21:58:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from pslgate0.psl.com.sg (pslgate0.psl.com.sg [202.14.153.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3CB14CE3 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 21:57:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from klng@psl.com.sg) Received: from psl.com.sg (mirage [202.14.154.50]) by pslgate0.psl.com.sg (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA16504 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:54:51 +0800 (SGT) Received: from psl.com.sg (robin [202.14.154.175]) by psl.com.sg (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA28389; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:52:19 +0800 (SST) Message-ID: <37B25396.88ADF4C3@psl.com.sg> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:54:49 +0800 From: Ng Kok Leong Organization: Panasonic Singapore Laboratories Pte Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: klng@psl.com.sg Subject: Set up a router Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I am new to FreeBSD and router setup. I have two ethernet cards for the router machine and they are configure as follows: fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 202.14.153.187 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 202.14.153.255 ether 00:90:27:06:3d:88 xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 202.14.154.187 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 202.14.154.255 ether 00:60:97:b8:cf:70 The card, fxp0, is connected to Machine A with IP address, 202.14.153.190 through a hub and the card, xl0, is connected to Machine B with IP address, 202.14.154.186 through another hub. There is no problem in communication between router and Machine A and router and Machine B. However, when I tried to ping Machine A from Machine B and vice versa, it fails to connect. The IP forwarding is enabled by setting the gateway_enable = yes. The routing table obtained using netstat in the router is: Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 202.14.153.187 UGSc 2 10 fxp0 localhost localhost UH 0 1 lo0 202.14.153 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 202.14.153.187 0:90:27:6:3d:88 UHLW 1 0 lo0 202.14.154 link#2 UC 0 0 xl0 202.14.154.186 0:a0:c9:dd:65:c9 UHLW 0 33 xl0 1190 202.14.154.187 0:60:97:b8:cf:70 UHLW 0 72 lo0 May I know what is the problem with my router configuration? How can I configure the router for Machine A to be able to talk to Machine B without changing the physical connection? Hope to hear from you soon. Thank you in advance. Regards Kok Leong To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 12 2:25:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from nexus.plymovent.se (nexus.plymovent.se [212.247.77.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661EE14E9F for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 02:25:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thomas.uhrfelt@plymovent.se) Received: from tu ([192.168.1.21]) by nexus.plymovent.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA09957; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:31:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from thomas.uhrfelt@plymovent.se) From: "Thomas Uhrfelt" To: "Ng Kok Leong" Cc: Subject: RE: Set up a router Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:22:22 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <37B25396.88ADF4C3@psl.com.sg> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > connect. The IP forwarding is enabled by setting the gateway_enable = > yes. > It should be gateway_enable="YES", or perhaps you already got that. It isnt clear reading the above.. Thomas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 12 7:11:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from www.esn.net (www.esn.net [206.154.14.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79C01573B for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 07:11:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jbruner@esn.net) Received: from arthur (proxy.onlineinfoservices.com [207.59.99.12]) by www.esn.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA05906 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:20:47 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: From: "C. Jason Bruner" To: Subject: WAN via PPP with -alias Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 10:12:16 -0400 Message-ID: <000001bee4cc$aeef4410$14000032@arthur.onlineinfoservices.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Greetings all, I'm a FreeBSD newbie, and I would greatly appreciate any help that anyone can give me with a problem I'm having. I've created a dial-up WAN connection between our satellite office and our home office with two FreeBSD machines: 1 acting as a PPP client at the satellite office, and another acting as a PPP server in our home office. Because we have two different subnets, and access to the Internet here, we set the PPP client up via a "PPP -auto -alias demand" type connection so the satellite office could have Internet access, and it works great at the satellite office. Each computer using the PPP client as a gateway can see the rest of our network, and consequently the Internet. No problems at all there. However, I'd hoped to be able to use the same connection to give our home office access to our satellite office by using the PPP server here as a gateway. No luck there. From even the PPP server (and any machine using the PPP server as a gateway), I can see the PPP client machine, but none of the other machines on the network. Traceroutes show everything as timeouts past the PPP client. I've tried running routed on the PPP client/gateway machine, but no luck. I imagine that everything is getting loused up by the fact that I'm using the -alias option, but I'm not sure. I've got GATEWAY_ENABLED="YES" in the rc.conf, and tried using "enable proxy" in the ppp.conf, but doesn't seem to help. If anyone has any ideas about what I'm missing, I'd appreciate any assistance at all. Thanks in advance, Jason jbruner@esn.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 12 8:17: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.epita.fr (hermes.epita.fr [194.98.116.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC73157C2; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:17:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@epita.fr) Received: from guiscar (guiscar.epita.fr [10.42.1.49]) by hermes.epita.fr id QAA13470 Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:45:12 GMT From: free bsd Message-Id: <199908121645.QAA13470@hermes.epita.fr> Subject: need some tools To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:16:07 +0000 (GMT) Organization: Epita (French Computer Science school) Operating-System: definitely UNIX Postal-Address: 14 rue voltaire, 94270 kremlin bicêtre Function: Computer Science Student X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL0pre8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hello, I would like to know, if there a way (a tools) to make a partition "fat16". thanks. -- flav To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 12 8:31:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA0D157CE; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:31:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA23838; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:29:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id JAA04195; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:28:50 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908121528.JAA04195@harmony.village.org> To: free bsd Subject: Re: need some tools Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:16:07 -0000." <199908121645.QAA13470@hermes.epita.fr> References: <199908121645.QAA13470@hermes.epita.fr> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:28:50 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199908121645.QAA13470@hermes.epita.fr> free bsd writes: : I would like to know, if there a way (a tools) to make a partition "fat16". fdisk to mark the partion as fat16, newfs_msdos to splat a file system onto it. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 12 8:37:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A5C157CE for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:37:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA47648; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:35:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA04085; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:37:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199908121537.QAA04085@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: jbruner@esn.net Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WAN via PPP with -alias In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Aug 1999 10:12:16 EDT." <000001bee4cc$aeef4410$14000032@arthur.onlineinfoservices.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:37:55 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, If net access is provided via your home office, you should only do the packet aliasing at that point - the connection between the two offices should not be aliased. The two networks should then talk with a simple ``add HISADDR'' on each side where is the remote network & mask (something like ``1.2.3.4/24''). > Greetings all, > > I'm a FreeBSD newbie, and I would greatly appreciate any help that anyone > can give me with a problem I'm having. > > I've created a dial-up WAN connection between our satellite office and our > home office with two FreeBSD machines: 1 acting as a PPP client at the > satellite office, and another acting as a PPP server in our home office. > Because we have two different subnets, and access to the Internet here, we > set the PPP client up via a "PPP -auto -alias demand" type connection so the > satellite office could have Internet access, and it works great at the > satellite office. Each computer using the PPP client as a gateway can see > the rest of our network, and consequently the Internet. No problems at all > there. > > However, I'd hoped to be able to use the same connection to give our home > office access to our satellite office by using the PPP server here as a > gateway. No luck there. From even the PPP server (and any machine using > the PPP server as a gateway), I can see the PPP client machine, but none of > the other machines on the network. Traceroutes show everything as timeouts > past the PPP client. I've tried running routed on the PPP client/gateway > machine, but no luck. I imagine that everything is getting loused up by the > fact that I'm using the -alias option, but I'm not sure. > > I've got GATEWAY_ENABLED="YES" in the rc.conf, and tried using "enable > proxy" in the ppp.conf, but doesn't seem to help. > > > If anyone has any ideas about what I'm missing, I'd appreciate any > assistance at all. > > Thanks in advance, > > Jason > > jbruner@esn.net > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 12 8:45:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from relay.Bohemia.Net (relay.Bohemia.Net [194.24.224.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F2E15840; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lizner@komix.cz) Received: from komix.bohemia.net (komix.bohemia.net [194.24.227.232]) by relay.Bohemia.Net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA19516; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:45:50 +0200 Received: from ganymed.komix.com (lizner@ganymed [207.207.207.207]) by komix.bohemia.net (8.8.5/SCO5) with ESMTP id RAA07912; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:39:37 +0200 (CETDST) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:48:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Lizner X-Sender: lizner@ganymed.komix.com To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: freebsd4.0 (a little bit offtopic) In-Reply-To: <199908121528.JAA04195@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org gentlemen, i am writing a short article on differences between 4.0 vs 3.2 versions for our corporate magazine - it's focused especially on networking/hacking. Is there a list of new features/approach ? Or what is your experience ? (i am testing myself, but more people == more interesting opinions). Thank you. Martin Lizner +420-2-7911637 Konstantinova 1472 Praha 4 CR Xerox does it again and again To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 12 8:58:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from janus.syracuse.net (janus.syracuse.net [205.232.47.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C5F157E5; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:58:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by janus.syracuse.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA91943; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:57:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: janus.syracuse.net: green owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:57:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian F. Feldman" X-Sender: green@janus.syracuse.net To: Warner Losh Cc: free bsd , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: need some tools In-Reply-To: <199908121528.JAA04195@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <199908121645.QAA13470@hermes.epita.fr> free bsd writes: > : I would like to know, if there a way (a tools) to make a partition "fat16". > > fdisk to mark the partion as fat16, newfs_msdos to splat a file system > onto it. > > Warner > This should have gone to freebsd-questions, not either -net, -hackers, or BOTH. Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ green@FreeBSD.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 12 9:53: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from www.esn.net (www.esn.net [206.154.14.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A9C15855 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:52:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jbruner@esn.net) Received: from arthur (proxy.onlineinfoservices.com [207.59.99.12]) by www.esn.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA09998; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:03:34 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: From: "C. Jason Bruner" To: "Brian Somers" , Cc: Subject: RE: WAN via PPP with -alias Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:55:03 -0400 Message-ID: <000701bee4e3$6c0b94c0$14000032@arthur.onlineinfoservices.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 In-Reply-To: <199908121537.QAA04085@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org When I tried taking out the -alias, the satellite office was no longer able to reach the Internet (they are on a different subnet than the home office), and I still wasn't able to ping any machines besides the host machine. Are all of the items I mentioned below needed (routed, enable proxy, etc.) needed? Are there any that I missed? Thanks, Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Brian Somers > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 11:38 AM > To: jbruner@esn.net > Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: WAN via PPP with -alias > > > Hi, > > If net access is provided via your home office, you should only do > the packet aliasing at that point - the connection between the two > offices should not be aliased. > > The two networks should then talk with a simple ``add > HISADDR'' on each side where is the remote network & mask > (something like ``1.2.3.4/24''). > > > Greetings all, > > > > I'm a FreeBSD newbie, and I would greatly appreciate any help > that anyone > > can give me with a problem I'm having. > > > > I've created a dial-up WAN connection between our satellite > office and our > > home office with two FreeBSD machines: 1 acting as a PPP client at the > > satellite office, and another acting as a PPP server in our home office. > > Because we have two different subnets, and access to the > Internet here, we > > set the PPP client up via a "PPP -auto -alias demand" type > connection so the > > satellite office could have Internet access, and it works great at the > > satellite office. Each computer using the PPP client as a > gateway can see > > the rest of our network, and consequently the Internet. No > problems at all > > there. > > > > However, I'd hoped to be able to use the same connection to > give our home > > office access to our satellite office by using the PPP server here as a > > gateway. No luck there. From even the PPP server (and any > machine using > > the PPP server as a gateway), I can see the PPP client machine, > but none of > > the other machines on the network. Traceroutes show everything > as timeouts > > past the PPP client. I've tried running routed on the PPP > client/gateway > > machine, but no luck. I imagine that everything is getting > loused up by the > > fact that I'm using the -alias option, but I'm not sure. > > > > I've got GATEWAY_ENABLED="YES" in the rc.conf, and tried using "enable > > proxy" in the ppp.conf, but doesn't seem to help. > > > > > > If anyone has any ideas about what I'm missing, I'd appreciate any > > assistance at all. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Jason > > > > jbruner@esn.net > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 12 15:39:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from Aries.utstar.com (mail.utstar.com [205.185.99.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8EC15682; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:39:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from suvrat@utstar.com) Received: from suvrat.utstar.com (nj48.utstar.com [172.16.2.48] (may be forged)) by Aries.utstar.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA19524; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 18:36:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199908122236.SAA19524@Aries.utstar.com> From: "Suvrat" To: , , Subject: userPPP vs kernel PPP performance Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 18:38:39 -0400 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, Any pointers to userPPP(iijPPP) vs kernelPPP(pppd) performance? thanks -suvrat email: suvrat@utstar.com Senior Software Engineer Ph (w) 732-767-5219 UTStarcom Inc (r) 732-721-3304 33 Wood Ave. south, 8th Flr. Iselin, NJ 08830 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Aug 13 1:34:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181A614D29 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 01:34:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA37125; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:33:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA00449; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 08:50:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199908130750.IAA00449@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: jbruner@esn.net Cc: "Brian Somers" , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WAN via PPP with -alias In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:55:03 EDT." <000701bee4e3$6c0b94c0$14000032@arthur.onlineinfoservices.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 08:50:02 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > When I tried taking out the -alias, the satellite office was no longer able > to reach the Internet (they are on a different subnet than the home office), > and I still wasn't able to ping any machines besides the host machine. > > Are all of the items I mentioned below needed (routed, enable proxy, etc.) > needed? Are there any that I missed? You need to make sure that routing works between the two LANs, then run the aliasing software at the gateway to the outside world. Routed is useless as it just runs around deleting static routes, and enable proxy isn't very useful at all. Did you add the two ``add HISADDR'' lines I mentioned ? If you get the two LANs talking, everything else should work fine. Of course everything on your ``home office'' LAN will need to know how to route to the ``satellite office'' LAN - you might be able to get away with setting up a static route on the 'net gateway and letting the ICMP redirects tell everyone else how to get there, but if you're using DHCP your best bet is to update everyones routing info. > Thanks, > > Jason > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Brian Somers > > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 11:38 AM > > To: jbruner@esn.net > > Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: WAN via PPP with -alias > > > > > > Hi, > > > > If net access is provided via your home office, you should only do > > the packet aliasing at that point - the connection between the two > > offices should not be aliased. > > > > The two networks should then talk with a simple ``add > > HISADDR'' on each side where is the remote network & mask > > (something like ``1.2.3.4/24''). > > > > > Greetings all, > > > > > > I'm a FreeBSD newbie, and I would greatly appreciate any help > > that anyone > > > can give me with a problem I'm having. > > > > > > I've created a dial-up WAN connection between our satellite > > office and our > > > home office with two FreeBSD machines: 1 acting as a PPP client at the > > > satellite office, and another acting as a PPP server in our home office. > > > Because we have two different subnets, and access to the > > Internet here, we > > > set the PPP client up via a "PPP -auto -alias demand" type > > connection so the > > > satellite office could have Internet access, and it works great at the > > > satellite office. Each computer using the PPP client as a > > gateway can see > > > the rest of our network, and consequently the Internet. No > > problems at all > > > there. > > > > > > However, I'd hoped to be able to use the same connection to > > give our home > > > office access to our satellite office by using the PPP server here as a > > > gateway. No luck there. From even the PPP server (and any > > machine using > > > the PPP server as a gateway), I can see the PPP client machine, > > but none of > > > the other machines on the network. Traceroutes show everything > > as timeouts > > > past the PPP client. I've tried running routed on the PPP > > client/gateway > > > machine, but no luck. I imagine that everything is getting > > loused up by the > > > fact that I'm using the -alias option, but I'm not sure. > > > > > > I've got GATEWAY_ENABLED="YES" in the rc.conf, and tried using "enable > > > proxy" in the ppp.conf, but doesn't seem to help. > > > > > > > > > If anyone has any ideas about what I'm missing, I'd appreciate any > > > assistance at all. > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > jbruner@esn.net -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message