From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 0: 2:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from turkey.ispro.net.tr (turkey.ispro.net.tr [195.174.18.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E02B14E69 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 00:02:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net.tr) Received: from localhost (yurtesen@localhost) by turkey.ispro.net.tr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA05998; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:02:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net.tr) X-Authentication-Warning: turkey.ispro.net.tr: yurtesen owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:02:14 +0200 (EET) From: Evren Yurtesen To: Bill Hamilton Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0 Rel to 3.1 stable In-Reply-To: <36D8EA99.59960F86@directlink.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG what is your hardware configuration? a hardware conflict may cause this or overclocked CPU and things like that... also you may try to delete everything in /usr/obj then try make upgrade again On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Bill Hamilton wrote: > I just cvsup'd and tried a "make upgrade" to get to 3.1 stable (from 3.0 > release) . > All was going well until make faulted ... > cd /usr/src/usr.bin/lex/lib; > /usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC > -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED cleandepend; > /usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC > -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED all; > /usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC > -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED -B install cleandir obj > Segmentation fault - core dumped > *** Error code 139 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Can someone advise me on how to proceed? > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 5:54:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from picalon.gun.de (picalon.gun.de [192.109.159.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D6514F00 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 05:54:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (pppak04.gtn.com [194.231.123.169]) by picalon.gun.de (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA08289 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:53:55 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id OAA51211; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:30:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:30:59 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: Andreas Klemm Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.1-STABLE: can't mount ccd's and panic dirty bufs on reboot or halt Message-ID: <19990228143059.A50935@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <19990225063704.A11192@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <19990225063704.A11192@titan.klemm.gtn.com>; from Andreas Klemm on Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 06:37:04AM +0100 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 06:37:04AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > Since a few days I experience problems with ccd. Sorry my fault. Forgot to add the scsi disk onto the right SCSI bus (have two). > controller ahc0 > controller scbus0 at ahc0 > disk da0 at scbus0 target 0 unit 0 > disk da3 at scbus0 target 1 unit 0 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this has to be da4 > tape sa0 at scbus0 target 4 > device cd0 at scbus0 target 5 > device cd1 at scbus0 target 6 > device pass0 # CAM passthrough driver > > # AHA 2940 > controller ahc1 > controller scbus1 at ahc1 > disk da1 at scbus1 target 1 unit 0 > disk da2 at scbus1 target 2 unit 0 ...... here is da 3 missing Sorry ;-) Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 6:42:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.6.61.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D521522D for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 06:42:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA154342954; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:42:34 -0500 Subject: Please bring me up to date. To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:42:33 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2060 Message-Id: <19990228144252.44D521522D@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have been out of touch with the FreeBSD project for a while, and I am a little confused by the current state of affairs. Let me describe my situtation. I have 3 machines runing FreeBSD. 1 (koala) is my gateway to the worls, and _MUSR NOT_ get mucked up (that's why it' FreeBSD :-)). The second (brown) is my new work laptop. The 3 (polar) is my old work laptop. koala is an HP Vectra P90. It has a Gus PnP sound card in it, and was origianly installed at about 2.1. It has booteasy on it (no good reason, just lack of knowledge at the time). It's using NAT and 2 ehternet cards (cablemodem and local network) as well as a ppp conection to a local ISP. brwon is an HP 7100 Omnibook. It is triple boot FreeBSD. NT, and Win95. It requires the Xo X server, since it's chipset is not supporeted in Xfree86 (yet). It was recently installed fresh from the 3.0 CD. polar is a Toshiba 500CDT. It requires the PAO patches, and was originaly installed around 2.2.5 (I think). I has bee updated via cvsup to 2.2-STABLE of a couple of months ago. I would like to get all 3 of these up to 3.1-STABLE. What CVSUP tag should I use? Are there any issues vis a vi a.out versus ELF? Is the Gus PnP supported in 3.1-STABLE without patches? Arethe PAO patches merged inot 3.1-STABLE. Do I have nay bootloaderconcerns? I would appreciate any feedback on this that you might have. I cannot tolerate a major disaster on the atweay machine, or the mew work laptop, and I desire to understand whats going on here, beforeI get myself in a world of trouble. Thanks for the expertise here. -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 Westvaco Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 6:47:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chmls06.mediaone.net (chmls06.mediaone.net [24.128.1.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410BC1522C for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 06:47:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from housley@frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net) Received: from frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.74.10]) by chmls06.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA19861; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:47:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA34124; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:47:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from housley@frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net) Message-ID: <36D95705.BE929B75@frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:47:33 -0500 From: "James E. Housley" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stan Brown , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please bring me up to date. References: <19990228144252.44D521522D@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Stan Brown wrote: > polar is a Toshiba 500CDT. It requires the PAO patches, and was > originaly installed around 2.2.5 (I think). I has bee updated via cvsup > to 2.2-STABLE of a couple of months ago. > I am not going to answer theses questions, but please provide us with PCMICA cards you use, That will make a big difference. -- James E. Housley PGP: 1024/03983B4D System Supply, Inc. 2C 3F 3A 0D A8 D8 C3 13 Pager: pagejim@notepage.com 7C F0 B5 BF 27 8B 92 FE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 7:20:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.directlink.net (mailhost.directlink.net [207.239.163.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A561523C for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 07:19:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billh@directlink.net) Received: from directlink.net [207.239.163.119] by mailhost.directlink.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.01) id A0E2630036; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:37:54 EST Message-ID: <36D95D97.5D089803@directlink.net> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:15:35 -0600 From: Bill Hamilton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0 Rel to 3.1 stable References: <36D8E3E3.2841BD56@silk.net> <36D8EA99.59960F86@directlink.net> <36D8F6D0.C24C3A0F@newsguy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > > Are you using -O2 in COPTFLAGS? > Just -O -pipe. This is my entire make.conf, less the comments ... NOPROFILE= true INSTALL=install -C NO_SENDMAIL= true COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe BOOTWAIT=30000 BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED= 115200 USA_RESIDENT= YES MASTER_SITE_BACKUP?= \ What does that tell you? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 7:23:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.directlink.net (mailhost.directlink.net [207.239.163.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841EE1523D for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 07:23:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billh@directlink.net) Received: from directlink.net [207.239.163.119] by mailhost.directlink.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.01) id A1C12A00A8; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:41:37 EST Message-ID: <36D95E76.7C6BE027@directlink.net> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:19:18 -0600 From: Bill Hamilton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Evren Yurtesen Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0 Rel to 3.1 stable References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The machine is not overclocked. It's K6 - 166, 96M ram, 9gig SCSI drive, 32x SCSI CD. I cleaned out /usr/obj and will try again later. How close was I, anyway? Evren Yurtesen wrote: > > what is your hardware configuration? a hardware conflict may cause this > or overclocked CPU and things like that... > also you may try to delete everything in /usr/obj then try make upgrade > again > > On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Bill Hamilton wrote: > > > I just cvsup'd and tried a "make upgrade" to get to 3.1 stable (from 3.0 > > release) . > > All was going well until make faulted ... > > cd /usr/src/usr.bin/lex/lib; > > /usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC > > -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED cleandepend; > > /usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC > > -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED all; > > /usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC > > -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED -B install cleandir obj > > Segmentation fault - core dumped > > *** Error code 139 > > > > Stop. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Can someone advise me on how to proceed? > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 7:43: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.6.61.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BC41524D for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 07:42:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA210546549; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:42:29 -0500 Subject: Clarification on "Please bring me up to date" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:42:28 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 773 Message-Id: <19990228154252.52BC41524D@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG housley@frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net sugested that I inform the list as to the PCMCIA crds that I am using, so here they are. brown: Linksys NE2000 clone (ed driver) and 3Com/Megahertz 3CCM556 modem polar: 3COM 3C589B (ep driver). Hope this helps to clarify my questions. Thanks for the prompt reply. -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 Westvaco Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 8:25:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from main.avias.com (avias-gw.corbina.net [195.14.40.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAFA15244 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 08:25:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from j@avias.com) Received: from 195.14.38.65 (dialup2.avias.com [195.14.38.69]) by main.avias.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id TAA39797 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 19:25:00 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from j@avias.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 19:25:14 +0300 From: Juriy Goloveshkin X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.19) S/N D508402B Reply-To: Juriy Goloveshkin X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <10809.990228@avias.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Re: rc.network->rc.firewall->natd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG just for reminder ===8<==============Original message text=============== > if "natd_enable" is set to "YES" in rc.conf then rc.firewall > loads the following rule: > if [ "X${natd_enable}" = X"YES" -a "X${natd_interface}" != X"" ]; then > $fwcmd add divert natd all from any to any via ${natd_interface} > fi > but after rc.firewall and before natd some programs in > rc.network require normally working network... I think natd needs to be loaded in the network_interfaces loop in network_pass1 in rc.network and should reside in /sbin. Any chance of a repository copy of src/usr.sbin/natd to src/sbin/natd (peter & jdp cc'd) ? If it's moved, I'll shift the loading. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! ===8<===========End of original message text=========== Best regards, Juriy mailto:j@avias.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 9:16:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hun.org (hun.org [207.49.60.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F127715262 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:16:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from attila@hun.org) Received: (from attila@localhost) by hun.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id RAA12252; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:15:46 GMT (envelope-from attila) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:15:46 GMT Message-Id: <199902281715.RAA12252@hun.org> From: attila! Reply-To: attila@hun.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: maybe "BSD Unix" (was Re: FreeBSD [3.1] is Unix ??? (Was: Re: 3.1 Release splash image)) Owner: attila@hun.org Organization: hun.org, over 40 years beyond the fringe home for unpenitent hackers and anarcho-cryptophreaks Mailer: XEmacs V20.4 (see alt.religion.emacs) Encrypted: NO Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG NB> anyone who wants to agree/argue with me, please use private mail; please don't clutter the list further than I am doing now... to cut to the chase: BSD Unix should sidestep X/Open and to my mind implies the best of both worlds; or even freeBSD, [the true-blue] descendant of Berkeley Unix which is certainly justifiable having been down the road since bsd4.0... personally, I object to "unix like" which leaves open the question: '...unix like? why dont you use real unix?' personally, after 25+ years of un*x, I have never seen two identical versions of "Unix" (or even closely related), even on identical hardware. why should one of very few lineal descendants of Unix be forced into the non-compatibles camp? the only point of convergence and standardization of the AT&T and Berkeley worlds was when Sun, under contract to AT&T's Unix International subsidiary merged AT&T SysV R4 to SunOS and more or less buried the problem of sockets v. named pipes --and then AT&T sold Unix International to Novell so old Ray could try to make IPX be the wrapper for IP... Ray crashed and burned against the wall on that one, subsequently transferring title to "Unix" to X/Open. once burned, twice learned Ray is currently the money behind Caldera and possibly on his way to winning an anti-trust action against M$ for M$' shabby treatment of anyone trying to load Windoz on DR-DOS. in the mid-80s, when every Tom, Dick, and Harry had a un*x hardware box (over 100 at one point), the hardware vendors could not even maintain backwards compatibility in their own point releases, which was the major factor in driving ISPs away from un*x in droves and handing the market to Bill Gate$ by default (may the bloated pig impload). attila out... __________________________________________________________________________ go not unto usenet for advice, for the inhabitants thereof will say: yes, and no, and maybe, and I don't know, and fuck-off. _________________________________________________________________ attila__ To be a ruler of men, you need at least 12 inches.... There is no safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 9:32:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sundance.KKS.net (sundance.KKS.net [212.62.128.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB2415271 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:31:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andy@mail.kks.net) Received: from desktop.atechnet.ml.org (cm-33.rot.KKS.net [212.62.129.33]) by sundance.KKS.net (8.8.8/8.8.8/HPatch) with SMTP id SAA16498 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 18:31:30 +0100 Message-Id: <199902281731.SAA16498@sundance.KKS.net> X-Sender: rozmanal@164.8.8.5 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 18:21:31 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Aleksander Rozman - Andy Subject: anon ftp problem Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi ! Last week I installed 3.1 over 2.2.7. I did it with quite some problems, but now I have almost everything working. Main problem is that I can't set ftpd to allow anonymous request. Is this bug in 3.1 or is problem strictly on my side. On my side it writes 530 user unknown. Problem is that user is in passwd list, but it still doesn-t work. In log it said : ANONYMOUS LOGIN REFUSED from Can please anybody help?? Andy ************************************************************************** * Aleksander Rozman - Andy * Member of: E2:EA, E2F, SAABer, Trekkie, * * andy@mail.kks.net * X-Phile, Heller's angel, True's screamer, * * andy@atechnet.ml.org * True's Trooper, Questie, Legacy, PO5, * * Maribor, Slovenia (Europe) * Profiler, Buffy (Slayerete), Pretender * * ICQ-UIC: 4911125 ********************************************* * PGP key available * http://www.atechnet.ml.org/~andy/ * ************************************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 9:39:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip223.houston2.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.201.223]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D1815293 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:39:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id LAA03580; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 11:40:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 11:40:22 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: Aleksander Rozman - Andy Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: anon ftp problem Message-ID: <19990228114022.B3091@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: <199902281731.SAA16498@sundance.KKS.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: <199902281731.SAA16498@sundance.KKS.net>; from Aleksander Rozman - Andy on Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 06:21:31PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 28, 1999, Aleksander Rozman - Andy put this into my mailbox: > > Hi ! > > Last week I installed 3.1 over 2.2.7. I did it with quite some problems, > but now I have almost everything working. Main problem is that I can't set > ftpd to allow anonymous request. Is this bug in 3.1 or is problem strictly > on my side. > > On my side it writes 530 user unknown. Problem is that user is in passwd > list, but it still doesn-t work. > > In log it said : ANONYMOUS LOGIN REFUSED from > > Can please anybody help?? Try going under 'Configure' in sysinstall, and then going under 'Networking'. There is a check-box for 'Anon FTP'. Go down to that and press Enter. > Andy -- Powered by FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE. "The Power to Serve!" In the FreeBSD handbook, on a network routing diagram, next to "Windows 95 box," there is commented "(Do not admit to owning one.)" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 9:40:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from turkey.ispro.net.tr (turkey.ispro.net.tr [195.174.18.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3916F1528D for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:40:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net.tr) Received: from localhost (yurtesen@localhost) by turkey.ispro.net.tr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA18401; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 19:39:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net.tr) X-Authentication-Warning: turkey.ispro.net.tr: yurtesen owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 19:39:38 +0200 (EET) From: Evren Yurtesen To: Aleksander Rozman - Andy Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: anon ftp problem In-Reply-To: <199902281731.SAA16498@sundance.KKS.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG have you tried to set anonymous ftp from /stand/sysinstall utility? On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Aleksander Rozman - Andy wrote: > > Hi ! > > Last week I installed 3.1 over 2.2.7. I did it with quite some problems, > but now I have almost everything working. Main problem is that I can't set > ftpd to allow anonymous request. Is this bug in 3.1 or is problem strictly > on my side. > > On my side it writes 530 user unknown. Problem is that user is in passwd > list, but it still doesn-t work. > > In log it said : ANONYMOUS LOGIN REFUSED from > > Can please anybody help?? > > > Andy > ************************************************************************** > * Aleksander Rozman - Andy * Member of: E2:EA, E2F, SAABer, Trekkie, * > * andy@mail.kks.net * X-Phile, Heller's angel, True's screamer, * > * andy@atechnet.ml.org * True's Trooper, Questie, Legacy, PO5, * > * Maribor, Slovenia (Europe) * Profiler, Buffy (Slayerete), Pretender * > * ICQ-UIC: 4911125 ********************************************* > * PGP key available * http://www.atechnet.ml.org/~andy/ * > ************************************************************************** > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 9:45:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80111526A for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:45:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA17147; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:44:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id JAA12017; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:44:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:44:56 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199902281744.JAA12017@vashon.polstra.com> To: castor@geocast.net Subject: Re: bus_dmamap_load & compiler glitch In-Reply-To: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , Castor Fu wrote: > I'm trying to use the bus_dma interface with 3.1-RELEASE and > the bus_dmamap_load routine appears to compile incorrectly with > the default C compiler and default flags. > > It somehow fouls up in detecting the first segment and generates > two segments, the first of which is garbage. > > Has anyone seen anything like this? I realize these routines are > not used much yet in current drivers. > > Putting in a few printfs seems to get the compiler to do the right thing. What optimization level are you using? Anything higher than "-O" is not guaranteed to work. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." -- H. L. Mencken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 10:22:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from geo.geocast.net (geo.geocast.net [128.177.240.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067A6152A5 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:22:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from castor@geocast.net) Received: from localhost (castor@localhost) by geo.geocast.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA18386; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:22:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:22:19 -0800 (PST) From: Castor Fu To: John Polstra Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bus_dmamap_load & compiler glitch In-Reply-To: <199902281744.JAA12017@vashon.polstra.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, John Polstra wrote: > In article , > Castor Fu wrote: > > I'm trying to use the bus_dma interface with 3.1-RELEASE and > > the bus_dmamap_load routine appears to compile incorrectly with > > the default C compiler and default flags. > > [. . . ] > > > > Putting in a few printfs seems to get the compiler to do the right thing. > > What optimization level are you using? Anything higher than "-O" is > not guaranteed to work. I'm using '-O'. Here's how things are compiled: clf-0# make CC="cc -v" busdma_machdep.o cc -v -c -O -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wunused -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -DVM_STACK -include opt_global.h -elf ../../i386/i386/busdma_machdep.c gcc version 2.7.2.1 /usr/libexec/cpp -lang-c89 -nostdinc -v -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -undef -D__GNUC__=2 -D__GNUC_MINOR__=7 -trigraphs -$ -D__STRICT_ANSI__ -D__unix__ -D__i386__ -D__FreeBSD__=3 -D__FreeBSD_cc_version=310001 -D__unix -D__i386 -Asystem(unix) -Asystem(FreeBSD) -Acpu(i386) -Amachine(i386) -D__OPTIMIZE__ -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wunused -D__ELF__ -DKERNEL -DVM_STACK -include opt_global.h ../../i386/i386/busdma_machdep.c /var/tmp/ccJoR362.i GNU CPP version 2.7.2.1 (i386 FreeBSD) #include "..." search starts here: #include <...> search starts here: . ../.. ../../../include End of search list. /usr/libexec/cc1 /var/tmp/ccJoR362.i -quiet -dumpbase busdma_machdep.c -O -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wunused -ansi -version -fformat-extensions -o /var/tmp/ccJoR362.s GNU C version 2.7.2.1 (i386 FreeBSD) compiled by GNU C version 2.7.2.1. /usr/libexec/elf/as -v -o busdma_machdep.o /var/tmp/ccJoR362.s GNU assembler version 2.9.1 (i386-unknown-freebsdelf), using BFD version 2.9.1 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 11:53:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from monet.etfal.g12.br (monet.etfal.g12.br [200.241.165.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F109152A7 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 11:52:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aald@monet.etfal.g12.br) Received: from localhost (aald@localhost) by monet.etfal.g12.br (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA08063 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:58:16 -0300 Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:58:16 -0300 (EST) From: Aldenor Falcao To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Windowmaker0.51.0 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I compiled and installed the libProplist, every when I try to configure the WM0.51 I the script complains about libProplist missing. I used ldconfig, and created a ld.so.conf, but I'm still seeing this ugly answer: ERROR!!! libPropList is not installed, or could not be found. Window Maker requires libPropList to build. Please read INSTALL to find where you can find libPropList, and install it first. BYe, Aldenor ----------------------------------------------------- Aldenor Falcao Martins, M Sc DEE - UFPB - ETFAL Internet Admin aald@ieee.org ----------------------------------------------------- And miles to go before I sleep. -- Robert Frost P.S. Maybe someday I'll sleep To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 11:56:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from monet.etfal.g12.br (monet.etfal.g12.br [200.241.165.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2495152A7 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 11:55:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aald@monet.etfal.g12.br) Received: from localhost (aald@localhost) by monet.etfal.g12.br (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA08088 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:00:51 -0300 Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:00:51 -0300 (EST) From: Aldenor Falcao To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Windowmaker0.51.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My version is 2.2.7-release ----------------------------------------------------- Aldenor Falcao Martins, M Sc DEE - UFPB - ETFAL Internet Admin aald@ieee.org ----------------------------------------------------- And miles to go before I sleep. -- Robert Frost P.S. Maybe someday I'll sleep On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Aldenor Falcao wrote: > > I compiled and installed the libProplist, every when I try to > configure the WM0.51 I the script complains about libProplist missing. > > I used ldconfig, and created a ld.so.conf, but I'm still seeing > this ugly answer: > ERROR!!! libPropList is not installed, or could not be found. > Window Maker requires libPropList to build. > Please read INSTALL to find where you can find libPropList, > and install it first. > > BYe, > Aldenor > > ----------------------------------------------------- > Aldenor Falcao Martins, M Sc > DEE - UFPB - ETFAL Internet Admin > aald@ieee.org > ----------------------------------------------------- > And miles to go before I sleep. -- Robert Frost > P.S. Maybe someday I'll sleep > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 12:25:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip55.houston2.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.201.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133B01529D for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 12:25:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id OAA04656; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:24:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:24:35 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: Aldenor Falcao Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Windowmaker0.51.0 Message-ID: <19990228142434.A4616@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: ; from Aldenor Falcao on Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 04:58:16PM -0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 28, 1999, Aldenor Falcao put this into my mailbox: > > I compiled and installed the libProplist, every when I try to > configure the WM0.51 I the script complains about libProplist missing. > > I used ldconfig, and created a ld.so.conf, but I'm still seeing > this ugly answer: > ERROR!!! libPropList is not installed, or could not be found. > Window Maker requires libPropList to build. > Please read INSTALL to find where you can find libPropList, > and install it first. This belongs in FreeBSD-Questions or FreeBSD-Ports. You should try: cd /usr/ports/devel/libPropList make make install cd ../../x11/windowmaker make make install > > BYe, > Aldenor > > ----------------------------------------------------- > Aldenor Falcao Martins, M Sc > DEE - UFPB - ETFAL Internet Admin > aald@ieee.org > ----------------------------------------------------- > And miles to go before I sleep. -- Robert Frost > P.S. Maybe someday I'll sleep > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Powered by FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE. "The Power to Serve!" In the FreeBSD handbook, on a network routing diagram, next to "Windows 95 box," there is commented "(Do not admit to owning one.)" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 14:57:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF201530C for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:57:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id HAA09349; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 07:57:48 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <36D9C653.A1A5D6F2@newsguy.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 07:42:27 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 3.1 warning messages Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Shouldn't we have got rid of the following: > "Can't find file boot.config'" > "Can't find file boot.help'" ? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "To make it absolutely clear: you stand on the wrong end of my blasters, so you better get lost before I start target practice!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 15:19:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ceia.nordier.com (c2-27-dbn.dial-up.net [196.34.155.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC6515338 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:19:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rnordier@nordier.com) Received: (from rnordier@localhost) by ceia.nordier.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id BAA07433; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 01:18:12 +0200 (SAT) From: Robert Nordier Message-Id: <199902282318.BAA07433@ceia.nordier.com> Subject: Re: 3.1 warning messages In-Reply-To: <36D9C653.A1A5D6F2@newsguy.com> from "Daniel C. Sobral" at "Mar 1, 99 07:42:27 am" To: dcs@newsguy.com (Daniel C. Sobral) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 01:18:10 +0200 (SAT) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Shouldn't we have got rid of the following: > > > "Can't find file boot.config'" > > "Can't find file boot.help'" > > ? We did. You must be using the old boot blocks. -- Robert Nordier To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 15:24:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from geo.geocast.net (geo.geocast.net [128.177.240.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79475153D6 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:24:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from castor@geocast.net) Received: from localhost (castor@localhost) by geo.geocast.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA19939 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:24:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:24:41 -0800 (PST) From: Castor Fu To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bus_dmamap_load & compiler glitch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This looks like a usage error on my part. I was using what I thought was the default value for nsegments in the dma tag, and letting this propogate though. Unfortunately, the system then tried to allocate a very large array off of the stack which caused the problems I was seeing. Sorry for the confusion. -castor On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, Castor Fu wrote: > I'm trying to use the bus_dma interface with 3.1-RELEASE and > the bus_dmamap_load routine appears to compile incorrectly with > the default C compiler and default flags. > > It somehow fouls up in detecting the first segment and generates > two segments, the first of which is garbage. > > Has anyone seen anything like this? I realize these routines are > not used much yet in current drivers. > > Putting in a few printfs seems to get the compiler to do the right thing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 15:53:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles234.castles.com [208.214.165.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B7A153E8 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:52:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA14894; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:43:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199902282343.PAA14894@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.1 warning messages In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 Mar 1999 07:42:27 +0900." <36D9C653.A1A5D6F2@newsguy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:43:51 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Shouldn't we have got rid of the following: > > > "Can't find file boot.config'" > > "Can't find file boot.help'" > > ? These are artifacts of leaving the old bootblocks on your disk; they're not printed by the new bootblocks. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 16:18:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f262.hotmail.com [207.82.251.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62B1915359 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:18:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garciacj@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 11821 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 1999 00:17:43 -0000 Message-ID: <19990301001743.11820.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 12.77.156.89 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:17:43 PST X-Originating-IP: [12.77.156.89] From: "carlos garcia" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:17:43 PST Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG auth dea5371e unsubcribe freebsd-stable b075133c@bc.seflin.org end ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 16:39:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dns.MexComUSA.NET (cm4094.cableco-op.com [208.138.40.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD17C1531D for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:39:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eculp@MexComUSA.net) Received: from MexComUSA.net (cm4094.cableco-op.com [208.138.40.94]) by dns.MexComUSA.NET (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA89150; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:39:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eculp@MexComUSA.net) Message-ID: <36D9E1AA.2AC4BEA9@MexComUSA.net> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 16:39:06 -0800 From: Edwin Culp Organization: Mexico Communicates, S.C. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kristopher Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new printer driver (nlpt0) woes References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Were you able to get the problem solved? I'm having the same problem with an Epson stylus with Current. It started with the new driver, plus I updated ghostscript to 5.50 at the same time and still don't have it sorted out. thanks ed kristopher wrote: > I've been trying to get with the new nlpt drivers since the current lpt > driver is "depreciated". First I must comment that the documentation for > the new lpt driver is kind of poor and the driver does not seem to work > the same as the former. I'm trying quite hard to figure out why so perhaps > someone can help. > CUT > > what happens: about 1/4 of the page prints and then it starts spewing > extra pages and garbage. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 17: 5: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost2.u.washington.edu (mailhost2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD281531D for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:04:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from darxpryte@u.washington.edu) Received: from cs237-7.spmodem.washington.edu (cs237-7.spmodem.washington.edu [140.142.173.128]) by mailhost2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA27855; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:04:07 -0800 Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 17:06:11 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Zentner To: Edwin Culp Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: new printer driver (nlpt0) woes In-Reply-To: <36D9E1AA.2AC4BEA9@MexComUSA.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings, I think I might have posted it to the list but here's what works for me now (apsfilter works dandy too). # Parallel port and friends. This replaces lpt0 (see lint or man pages) controller ppbus0 device nlpt0 at ppbus? device ppc0 at isa? port? tty irq 7 The other spiff thing is that dmesg will actually show the probe of ppbus so if there is a printer connected it will give the name and model of the printer as shown below. ppc0 at 0x378 irq 7 on isa ppc0: Winbond chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppb0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: ppbus0: MLC,PCL,PML nlpt0: on ppbus 0 nlpt0: Interrupt-driven port Note this probe will not take place if you have nothing connected to lpt0. I don't think ghostscript should affect the new printer driver. Best of luck! ========================================================================== Kristopher Zentner | "Would you tell me, please, which Aspiring Linguist | way I ought to go from here?" FreeBSD Advocate | "That depends a great deal on kzentner@u.washington.edu | where you want to go." said the Cat ========================================================================== On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Edwin Culp wrote: > Were you able to get the problem solved? I'm having the same problem with > an Epson stylus with Current. It started with the new driver, plus I updated > ghostscript to 5.50 at the same time and still don't have it sorted out. > > thanks > > ed > > kristopher wrote: > > > I've been trying to get with the new nlpt drivers since the current lpt > > driver is "depreciated". First I must comment that the documentation for > > the new lpt driver is kind of poor and the driver does not seem to work > > the same as the former. I'm trying quite hard to figure out why so perhaps > > someone can help. > > > > CUT > > > > > what happens: about 1/4 of the page prints and then it starts spewing > > extra pages and garbage. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 19:58:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF743152B1 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 19:58:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-216-180-15-202.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.15.202]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id VAA24454 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:57:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA00388 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:57:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199903010357.VAA00388@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: David Kelly Subject: rc5des slows tape thruput In-reply-to: Message from Matthew Jacob of "Fri, 26 Feb 1999 10:06:58 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:57:44 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mentioned the other day that I thought tape operations were slower these days than in the past. Booted my 2.2.5-RELEASE CD's and flipped over to the live filesystem to test. Used: dd if=/dev/zero bs=10k count=1000 of=/dev/rst0 In 12 runs on both DDS-1 and DDS-2 tapes got 349k/sec to 376k/sec. Didn't seem to matter which type type. Compression is jumpered off. These are the expected data rates I have seen in the past, but haven't seen recently. Booted single user into 3.0-current (as of Jan 30). Got similar results. And the same yet when multiuser doing the test as myself. But Friday night was getting half this thruput. Fired up X and repeated. Essentially the same results. Then fired up rc5des, which is niced and fell to an average of 185k/sec. Snipped from top: 294 dkelly 105 20 740K 520K RUN 9:58 97.95% 97.95% rc5des This behavior does not seem reasonable in an OS with FreeBSD's repute. System is a PPro-166/512k OC'ed to 210. Tape drive is on: ahc0: rev 0x00 int a irq 15 on pci0.9.0 ahc0: aic7870 Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa0: 5.0MB/s transfers (5.0MHz, offset 15) -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 19:58:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from math.missouri.edu (math.missouri.edu [128.206.72.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1E3152DC for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 19:58:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from math.missouri.edu (Mizzou-AS5-08.missouri.edu [128.206.205.200]) by math.missouri.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA13050; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:57:57 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <36DA1068.EE16A4E5@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:58:32 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Zentner Cc: Edwin Culp , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new printer driver (nlpt0) woes References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Zentner wrote: > > Greetings, > > I think I might have posted it to the list but here's what works for me > now (apsfilter works dandy too). > > # Parallel port and friends. This replaces lpt0 (see lint or man pages) > controller ppbus0 > device nlpt0 at ppbus? > device ppc0 at isa? port? tty irq 7 > That is what I used, and it still didn't work. Right now I am using the depreciated lpt0, which still works very well. -- Stephen Montgomery-Smith stephen@math.missouri.edu 307 Math Science Building stephen@showme.missouri.edu Department of Mathematics stephen@missouri.edu University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, MO 65211 USA Phone (573) 882 4540 Fax (573) 882 1869 http://math.missouri.edu/~stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 20:53: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [198.78.58.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BCE15230 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 20:53:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fullermd@futuresouth.com) Received: (from fullermd@localhost) by shell.futuresouth.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id WAA12380; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:52:43 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <19990228225243.W3203@futuresouth.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:52:43 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: David Kelly , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput References: <199903010357.VAA00388@nospam.hiwaay.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199903010357.VAA00388@nospam.hiwaay.net>; from David Kelly on Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 09:57:44PM -0600 X-OS: FreeBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 09:57:44PM -0600, a little birdie told me that David Kelly remarked > > But Friday night was getting half this thruput. Fired up X and repeated. > Essentially the same results. Then fired up rc5des, which is niced and > fell to an average of 185k/sec. Snipped from top: > > 294 dkelly 105 20 740K 520K RUN 9:58 97.95% 97.95% rc5des One thing to bear in mind is that a process nice'd to 20 still gets CPU time allotted. I always idprio rc5des and friends. For instance, in this case, run (as root, I think you have to) idprio 31 -294 Then it'll show up as nice 52, and ONLY use idle CPU cycles, instead of having an (albeit small) slice of cycles always allocated it. No, I don't think it's 'good' that nice'd to 20 it slows the tape by that much, but this is at least a partial workaround (and the better way to do it IMO anyway). Have you tried running rc5des under 2.2.5 and seeing what speed you got? --- *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* | Matthew Fuller http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd | * fullermd@futuresouth.com fullermd@over-yonder.net * | UNIX Systems Administrator Specializing in FreeBSD | * FutureSouth Communications ISPHelp ISP Consulting * | "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, | * is because I haven't figured out how to light the * | middle yet" | *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 21:30:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aurora.sol.net (aurora.sol.net [206.55.65.76]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512BA151A3 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:30:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgreco@aurora.sol.net) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by aurora.sol.net (8.8.8/8.8.8/SNNS-1.02) id XAA14161 for stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:29:55 -0600 (CST) From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199903010529.XAA14161@aurora.sol.net> Subject: Any known NFS problems in 3.1R? To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:29:54 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've got a pet project which involves Diablo (news transit) and NFS. Hi Matt. DSRS is a search engine that NFS mounts a Diablo spool and proceeds to build databases of various interesting information. I recently did an upgrade to 3.1R on the host running DSRS, and all was well for about a day. Now, twice, I've found the machine stuck in a twilight state. Any running processes continue to run (such as my watchdog-card daemon, top on a vty, etc) but the instant any disk access is attempted, the process joins the rest of the system in a grand hang. At least, this is what it appears to be. "top" reports that the processes are stuck in "inode". Other processes such as "snmpd" which are not apparently stuck in inode may be gunned down (thanks to the kill in "top"), but a kill -TERM 1 has no effect even after several minutes. The NFS server is a slightly-pre-3.0R machine, and will probably get itself upgraded tonight. What information should I be looking for to help me figure out what is happening? ... Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Greco - Systems Administrator jgreco@ns.sol.net Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/342-4847 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 22: 4:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aniwa.sky (p54-max12.wlg.ihug.co.nz [216.100.145.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DFB1528A for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:04:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@squiz.co.nz) Received: from aniwa.sky (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aniwa.sky (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA09311; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:03:42 +1300 (NZDT) Message-Id: <199903010603.TAA09311@aniwa.sky> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Cc: David Kelly , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:52:43 MDT." <19990228225243.W3203@futuresouth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 19:03:40 +1300 From: Andrew McNaughton Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 09:57:44PM -0600, a little birdie told me > that David Kelly remarked > > > > But Friday night was getting half this thruput. Fired up X and repeated. > > Essentially the same results. Then fired up rc5des, which is niced and > > fell to an average of 185k/sec. Snipped from top: > > > > 294 dkelly 105 20 740K 520K RUN 9:58 97.95% 97.95% rc5des > > One thing to bear in mind is that a process nice'd to 20 still gets CPU > time allotted. I always idprio rc5des and friends. For instance, in > this case, run (as root, I think you have to) > idprio 31 -294 > > Then it'll show up as nice 52, and ONLY use idle CPU cycles, instead of > having an (albeit small) slice of cycles always allocated it. > > No, I don't think it's 'good' that nice'd to 20 it slows the tape by that > much, but this is at least a partial workaround (and the better way to do > it IMO anyway). Does the tape process get niced also then? Is the nice setting reasonable? If not then why is rc5des allowed to slow it so much? I don't imagine that dd to tape would need that much CPU. I'd expect it to bottleneck on IO. Is it something to do with needing very small chunks of CPU time and running into lots of small waits for the kernel's CPU time allocation? Andrew McNaughton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 28 23:11:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69CE314BE1 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:11:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 10HMqe-0007k1-00; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:10:40 -0800 Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:10:36 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Andrew McNaughton Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" , David Kelly , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-Reply-To: <199903010603.TAA09311@aniwa.sky> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Andrew McNaughton wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 09:57:44PM -0600, a little birdie told me > > that David Kelly remarked > > > > > > But Friday night was getting half this thruput. Fired up X and repeated. > > > Essentially the same results. Then fired up rc5des, which is niced and > > > fell to an average of 185k/sec. Snipped from top: > > > > > > 294 dkelly 105 20 740K 520K RUN 9:58 97.95% 97.95% rc5des > > > > One thing to bear in mind is that a process nice'd to 20 still gets CPU > > time allotted. I always idprio rc5des and friends. For instance, in > > this case, run (as root, I think you have to) > > idprio 31 -294 > > > > Then it'll show up as nice 52, and ONLY use idle CPU cycles, instead of > > having an (albeit small) slice of cycles always allocated it. > > > > No, I don't think it's 'good' that nice'd to 20 it slows the tape by that > > much, but this is at least a partial workaround (and the better way to do > > it IMO anyway). > > Does the tape process get niced also then? Is the nice setting > reasonable? If not then why is rc5des allowed to slow it so much? > > I don't imagine that dd to tape would need that much CPU. I'd expect > it to bottleneck on IO. Is it something to do with needing very small > chunks of CPU time and running into lots of small waits for the > kernel's CPU time allocation? Maybe, maybe not. There are device driver issues with scheduling and CPU utilization, and with block sizes, and buffering capacity of the driver and device. Also an IO bound process will yield to the scheduler a lot, and since rc5des is probably never blocked, and it will always take slice. If you tape requires another block at that moment, it is just going to have to wait. > Andrew McNaughton Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 2:41:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED47E1533A for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 02:41:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phate1@ix.netcom.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id EAA05937 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 04:41:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from user-38ld1cd.dialup.mindspring.com(209.86.133.141) by dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma005929; Mon Mar 1 04:41:13 1999 Message-ID: <36DA6EA4.D6FDB824@ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 05:40:36 -0500 From: Yev Organization: Integration Soft. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: No buffer space available Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I would appreciate if you can help me with a certain problem. I have a box that is heavily loaded; it does 8.5Mbps on a 10MB pipe. FreeBSD 3.1-Stable (as of last night) 512MB ram Dual 400 Xeon Maxusers 384, with NMBCLUSTERS set 8192 After the box is up for a 1 day or so, it starts to complain upon a call to socket(): No buffer space available pstat -T shows 300 files in use out of 12000+ netstat -m shows 1493 in use out of 8192 max.. (6000 peak) What do I need to increase? I just dont understand, everything seems to be available.. Thanks in advance Y To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 2:52:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rossel.saarnet.de (rossel.saarnet.de [145.253.240.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D1015337 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 02:52:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doehrm@aubi.de) Received: from igate.aubi.de (root@igate.aubi.de [145.253.242.249]) by rossel.saarnet.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA10939; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:55:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from cisco.aubi.de (cisco.aubi.de [170.56.121.252]) by igate.aubi.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA26976; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:47:32 +0100 Received: from exchange.aubi.de (EXCHANGE.aubi.de [170.56.121.91]) by cisco.aubi.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA17519; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:02:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by EXCHANGE.aubi.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:51:23 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Markus_D=F6hr?= To: "'Yev'" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: No buffer space available Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:51:15 +0100 Importance: high X-Priority: 1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > After the box is up for a 1 day or so, it starts to complain=20 > upon a call > to socket(): No buffer space available which kind of nic do you have? probably 3c909(b)? what gives a 'netstat -m'? -- Markus Doehr =20 IT Admin =20 AUBI Baubeschl=E4ge GmbH =20 Tel.: +49 6503 917 152 =20 Fax : +49 6503 917 190 =20 e-Mail: doehrm@aubi.de MD1139-RIPE =20 ************************* =20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 2:57:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B1715213 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 02:57:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phate1@ix.netcom.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id EAA01526; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 04:56:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from user-38ld1cd.dialup.mindspring.com(209.86.133.141) by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma001520; Mon Mar 1 04:56:19 1999 Message-ID: <36DA722F.929D2DE7@ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 05:55:43 -0500 From: Yev Organization: Integration Soft. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Markus Döhr" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No buffer space available References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm using Intel EtherExpress 100B/Pro - the fxp0 driver. [phate@x1 ~ 05:53:27 ]$ netstat -m 6050/7008 mbufs in use: 2101 mbufs allocated to data 3949 mbufs allocated to packet headers 1791/2208/8192 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 5292 Kbytes allocated to network (81% in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines The current mbufs is never higher than 5000 or so.. [phate@x1 ~ 05:56:18 ]$ pstat -T 263/12328 files 23M/1199M swap space Regards, Y Markus Döhr wrote: > > > After the box is up for a 1 day or so, it starts to complain > > upon a call > > to socket(): No buffer space available > > which kind of nic do you have? probably 3c909(b)? > > what gives a 'netstat -m'? > > -- > Markus Doehr > IT Admin > AUBI Baubeschläge GmbH > Tel.: +49 6503 917 152 > Fax : +49 6503 917 190 > e-Mail: doehrm@aubi.de > MD1139-RIPE > ************************* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 6: 2: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006981536F for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 06:02:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id GAA05746; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 06:01:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 06:01:31 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: "Jason J. Horton" Cc: Keith Woodman , Yev , Langa Kentane , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Binding more ip addresses to one card Message-ID: <19990301060131.A5716@relay.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: ; from Jason J. Horton on Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 03:49:59PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > replace fxp0 with yer ether device and a.b.c.d with the IP you want. > Then toss it in /etc/rc.local (repeat if neccessary) and yer set. Rather than put this in /etc/rc.local, put it in /etc/rc.conf like this: ifconfig_fxp0="inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 1.2.3.5 netmask 0xffffffff" ifconfig_fxp0_alias1="inet 1.2.3.6 netmask 0xffffffff" -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 6:17: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE23D15384 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 06:16:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfieber@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA26874; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 09:16:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 09:16:37 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Kris Zentner Cc: Edwin Culp , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new printer driver (nlpt0) woes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Kris Zentner wrote: > I think I might have posted it to the list but here's what works for me > now (apsfilter works dandy too). > > # Parallel port and friends. This replaces lpt0 (see lint or man pages) > controller ppbus0 > device nlpt0 at ppbus? > device ppc0 at isa? port? tty irq 7 Changing from "net", as supplied in the GENERIC kernel to "tty" solved my garbage problems. Searching through the mailing list archives I even saw suggestions for using "cam". Could someone in the know (a) explain the implications of the different options and (b) document this in LINT, and GENERIC? It used to be that I could use a port as both printer port and as a network port without reconfiguration. Now it appears as though I have to reconfigure, recompile and reboot to do the same? I'm not sure that represent progress. I'll grant that the new arrangement is probably a lot more flexible, but it is unfortunate that correct configuration for the common case (just a printer) has been greatly complicated. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 7: 9:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from finsco.com (unknown [216.0.231.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E01F41537A for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 07:09:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billh@finsco.com) Received: from finsco.com by finsco.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA01578; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 09:05:09 -0600 Message-ID: <36DAACE3.E851C1FA@finsco.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 09:06:11 -0600 From: Bill Hamilton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 3.1 upgrade problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have tried 3 times to "make upgrade" from 3.0-RELEASE to 3.1-CURRENT. The first time it coredumped while working on the lex stuff. The next 2 times it died in libexec someplace at roughly the same spot. Below is the result of make upgrade 2> filename on Sunday pm and Monday am: This is from Sunday .............................. /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _fixtfdi.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _fixunstfdi.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _floatditf.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _trampoline.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: bt_debug.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: big5.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: euc.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: mskanji.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: utf2.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: ctrace.o: no name list /* starting time is 18:2:34 */ /* ending time is 18:2:34 */ /* starting time is 18:2:34 */ /* ending time is 18:2:34 */ (Number of opcodes is 232) /usr/libexec/aout/nm: insn-attrtab.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: reorg.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: sdbout.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: xcoffout.o: no name list /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus/../../../../contrib/gcc/cp/parse.y contains 5 shift/reduce conflicts and 38 reduce/reduce conflicts. /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _fixtfdi.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _fixunstfdi.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _floatditf.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _trampoline.o: no name list strip: maybe_stripped: File format not recognized conflicts: 62 shift/reduce conflicts: 1 shift/reduce /usr/src/usr.bin/colldef/scan.l:632: warning: `yyunput' defined but not used /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/../../contrib/nvi/vi/getc.c: In function `cs_init': /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/../../contrib/nvi/vi/getc.c:52: warning: passing arg 3 of `db_eget' from incompatible pointer type /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/../../contrib/nvi/vi/getc.c: In function `cs_prev': /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/../../contrib/nvi/vi/getc.c:182: warning: passing arg 4 of `db_get' from incompatible pointer type /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/../../contrib/nvi/vi/v_txt.c: In function `txt_fc_col': /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/../../contrib/nvi/vi/v_txt.c:2226: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/../../contrib/nvi/vi/v_txt.c:2244: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/../../contrib/nvi/vi/v_ulcase.c: In function `v_mulcase': /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/../../contrib/nvi/vi/v_ulcase.c:119: warning: passing arg 4 of `db_get' from incompatible pointer type /* starting time is 18:17:27 */ /* ending time is 18:17:27 */ /* starting time is 18:17:27 */ /* ending time is 18:17:27 */ nm: version.o: no name list nm: version.So: no name list nm: version.o: no name list nm: version.So: no name list nm: cstringi.o: no name list nm: builtinbuf.o: no name list nm: cstringi.So: no name list nm: builtinbuf.So: no name list nm: _fixtfdi.o: no name list nm: _fixunstfdi.o: no name list nm: _floatditf.o: no name list nm: _trampoline.o: no name list nm: bt_debug.o: no name list nm: big5.o: no name list nm: euc.o: no name list nm: mskanji.o: no name list nm: utf2.o: no name list nm: bt_debug.So: no name list nm: big5.So: no name list nm: euc.So: no name list nm: mskanji.So: no name list nm: utf2.So: no name list nm: bt_debug.o: no name list nm: _spinlock_stub.o: no name list nm: big5.o: no name list nm: euc.o: no name list nm: mskanji.o: no name list nm: utf2.o: no name list nm: _flock_stub.o: no name list nm: bt_debug.So: no name list nm: _spinlock_stub.So: no name list nm: big5.So: no name list nm: euc.So: no name list nm: mskanji.So: no name list nm: utf2.So: no name list nm: _flock_stub.So: no name list nm: ctrace.o: no name list nm: ctrace.So: no name list /usr/src/lib/libdisk/disk.c:55: warning: `Write_Int32' defined but not used nm: Version.o: no name list nm: Version.o: no name list nm: Version.So: no name list nm: Version.So: no name list /usr/src/lib/libpam/libpam/../../../contrib/libpam/libpam/pam_handlers.c: In function `_pam_add_handler': /usr/src/lib/libpam/libpam/../../../contrib/libpam/libpam/pam_handlers.c:578: warning: passing arg 1 of `_pam_open_static_handler' discards `const' from pointer target type nm: rwall_xdr.o: no name list nm: rwall_xdr.So: no name list /usr/src/lib/libstand/strtol.c: In function `strtol': /usr/src/lib/libstand/strtol.c:107: warning: comparison is always 1 due to limited range of data type /usr/src/lib/libstand/../libc/string/memset.c: In function `bzero': /usr/src/lib/libstand/../libc/string/memset.c:71: warning: unused variable `c' /usr/src/lib/libstand/../libc/string/strcat.c: In function `strcat': /usr/src/lib/libstand/../libc/string/strcat.c:48: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value /usr/src/lib/libstand/../libc/string/strcpy.c: In function `strcpy': /usr/src/lib/libstand/../libc/string/strcpy.c:48: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value nm: cohtty.o: no name list conflicts: 62 shift/reduce conflicts: 1 shift/reduce (Number of opcodes is 232) nm: insn-attrtab.o: no name list nm: reorg.o: no name list nm: sdbout.o: no name list nm: xcoffout.o: no name list /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus/../../../../contrib/gcc/cp/parse.y contains 5 shift/reduce conflicts and 38 reduce/reduce conflicts. cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 This is from Monday .............................. /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _fixtfdi.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _fixunstfdi.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _floatditf.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: _trampoline.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: bt_debug.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: big5.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: euc.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: mskanji.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: utf2.o: no name list /usr/libexec/aout/nm: ctrace.o: no name list {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:1100: Error: operands given don't match any known 386 instruction {standard input}:1102: Error: unbalenced parenthesis in first operand. This is an AMD K6-166 with 96MB ram, 9g quantum scsi drive, running 3.0R. It is not overclocked and has good fans on the drive. The cvsups were done just prior to building. I cleaned out /usr/obj before Sunday's make, but not Monday's. My make.conf uses -O -pipe. Any ideas on what could be my problem? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 8:48:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vito.hymarc.com (homer.hymarc.com [206.191.28.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6752153DF for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 08:48:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rleir@hymarc.com) Received: from hymarc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vito.hymarc.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA00304 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:18:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rleir@hymarc.com) Message-ID: <36DABDD8.CBAA815A@hymarc.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 11:18:32 -0500 From: Rick Leir Organization: Hymarc 3D Vision Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.0-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: 3.0 Netscape 4.5 in Linux compatibility mode References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi All I am getting a 'lockup' running FreeBSD 3.0 with Netscape 4.5 in Linux compatibility mode. 'Lockup' means that I can ping to the FreeBSD box, but not telnet or login and the console is hung. It always occurs when I click the Delete button in the messaging window. Not all clcks on Delete cause a lockup, just one in ten. I don't think this is related to movemail because it occurs whether or not I have /var/mail writable, and I do not have a movemail executable. linux_lib-2.5 13854930 Feb 23 11:06 communicator-v45-us.x86-unknown-linux2.0.tar.gz It is time for me to get into the kernel debugger, but this is the first time for me so perhaps someone could tell me the first few steps. Netscape does provide a native FreeBSD port, I may get that, but it would be interesting to know whether the Linux compatibility library has a problem. cheers -- Rick Copyright (c) 1992-1998 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 3.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Oct 17 17:45:06 GMT 1998 jkh@kickme.freebsd.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz cost 3214 ns Timecounter "TSC" frequency 348204994 Hz cost 144 ns CPU: Pentium II (quarter-micron) (348.20-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x652 Stepping=2 Features=0x183fbff> real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) avail memory = 127782912 (124788K bytes) Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: chip0: rev 0x02 on pci0.0.0 chip1: rev 0x02 on pci0.1.0 chip2: rev 0x03 on pci0.2.0 chip3: rev 0x02 on pci0.7.0 ide_pci0: rev 0x01 on pci0.7.1 chip4: rev 0x01 int d irq 0 on pci0.7.2 chip5: rev 0x02 on pci0.7.3 xl0: <3Com 3c905 Fast Etherlink XL 10/100BaseTX> rev 0x00 int a irq 14 on pci0.10.0 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:10:5a:9c:b9:06 xl0: autoneg complete, link status good (half-duplex, 100Mbps) Probing for devices on PCI bus 1: vga0: rev 0x5c on pci1.0.0 Probing for devices on PCI bus 2: ahc0: rev 0x00 int a irq 11 on pci2.4.0 ahc0: aic7890/91 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs ahc1: rev 0x03 int a irq 11 on pci2.6.0 ahc1: aic7860 Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 3/255 SCBs Probing for devices on the ISA bus: sc0 at 0x60-0x6f irq 1 on motherboard sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> ed0 not found at 0x280 fe0 not found at 0x300 sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa sio1: type 16550A lpt0 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa lpt0: Interrupt-driven port lp0: TCP/IP capable interface psm0 at 0x60-0x64 irq 12 on motherboard psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in wdc0 not found at 0x1f0 wdc1 not found at 0x170 wt0 not found at 0x300 mcd0 not found at 0x300 matcdc0 not found at 0x230 scd0 not found at 0x230 ie0: unknown board_id: f000 ie0 not found at 0x300 ep0 not found at 0x300 ex0 not found le0 not found at 0x300 lnc0 not found at 0x280 ze0 not found at 0x300 zp0 not found at 0x300 cs0 not found at 0x300 adv0 not found at 0x330 bt0 not found at 0x134 aha0 not found at 0x134 npx0 on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle sa0 at ahc1 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI2 device sa0: 10.0MB/s transfers (10.0MHz, offset 15) da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI2 device da0: 80.0MB/s transfers (40.0MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI2 device da2: 80.0MB/s transfers (40.0MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da2: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI2 device da1: 80.0MB/s transfers (40.0MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 8683MB (17783240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) changing root device to da0s1a cd0 at ahc1 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI2 device cd0: 20.0MB/s transfers (20.0MHz, offset 15) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present WARNING: / was not properly dismounted -- Rick Leir, Hymarc 3D Vision Systems (613) 727 1584 x214 Fast, precise laser scanners. http://www.hymarc.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 8:52: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from step.everex.com (step.everex.com [209.77.194.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECA014BDB for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 08:51:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ninot@everex.com) Received: from orion005 (orion005.everex.com [209.77.194.25]) by step.everex.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA24511 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 08:51:40 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990301090224.00aa7710@mail.everex.com> X-Sender: i004675@mail.everex.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 09:14:24 +0000 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Nino Tungul Subject: help! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_1853034==_.ALT" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=====================_1853034==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi! everyone. I'm trying to create an alias to one of the user but it just would'nt work. on the aliases file i put the ff. sample: * aliases file ... ... root: user1, user2 webmaster: user1, user2 *(this is the alias i want to setup) ... ... if i test it on the local server and just mail to webmaster, it works the two users both receive the mail. but when i put the whole e-mail address, it just goes to first user(user1). mail webmaster ...ok mail webmaster@mail.domain.com ...works ok too. mail webmaster@domain.com ... only goes to user1 on ohter client using eudora: To: webmaster@mail.domain.com ...works ok too. To: webmaster@domain.com ... only goes to user1 btw, mail server: mail.domain.com web server: web.domain.com on our dns server: domain.com @ IN SOA ns1.domain.com. admin.domain.com. ( 1999020310 ; Serial 10800 ; Refresh 1800 ; Retry 604800 ; Expire 86400 ) ; ttl IN NS ns1.domain.com. IN NS ns2.domain.com. IN MX 20 ns2.domain.com. IN MX 10 ns1.domain.com. IN MX 1 mail.domain.com. IN A 192.168.2.11 mail IN A 192.168.2.8 web IN A 192.168.2.11 www IN CNAME web.domain.com. ... ... everything works except for this alias webmaster. is there something special with webmaster? or is it possible to redirect all mail to a particular alias or user directly w/o using aliases? one more thing, even if i removed webmaster on the aliases, it still goes to user1. thanks in advance. regards to all, nino. --=====================_1853034==_.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Hi! everyone.

I'm trying to create an alias to one of the user but it just would'nt  work.

on the aliases file i put the ff.
 sample:
      * aliases file
        ...
        ...
        root:   user1, user2
        webmaster:   user1, user2               *(this is the alias i want to setup)
        ...
        ...

if i test it on the local server and just mail to webmaster, it works the two users both receive
the mail. but when i put the whole e-mail address, it just goes to first user(user1).
        mail   webmaster     ...ok
        mail  webmaster@mail.domain.com         ...works ok too.
        mail  webmaster@domain.com ... only goes to user1

on ohter client using eudora:
        To:  webmaster@mail.domain.com  ...works ok too.
        To:  webmaster@domain.com ... only goes to user1

btw, 

        mail server:    mail.domain.com
        web server:    web.domain.com

on our dns server:  domain.com

        @       IN      SOA     ns1.domain.com. admin.domain.com. (
                                                1999020310      ; Serial
                                                10800   ; Refresh
                                                1800    ; Retry
                                                604800  ; Expire
                                                86400 ) ; ttl

                                        IN      NS      ns1.domain.com.
                                        IN      NS      ns2.domain.com.
                                        IN      MX      20 ns2.domain.com.
                                        IN      MX      10 ns1.domain.com.
                                        IN      MX      1 mail.domain.com.
                                        IN      A         192.168.2.11


        mail            IN     A         192.168.2.8
        web             IN     A          192.168.2.11

        www             IN     CNAME web.domain.com.
        ...
        ...


everything works except for this alias webmaster. is there something special with webmaster?
or is it possible to redirect all mail to a particular alias or user directly w/o using aliases?

one more thing, even if i removed webmaster on the aliases,
it still goes to user1.


thanks in advance.


regards to all,
nino.
--=====================_1853034==_.ALT-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 9:32:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu (Dorm-36314.RH.UH.EDU [129.7.141.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68E015657 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 09:31:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) Received: from localhost (wotan@localhost) by dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA54408; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:31:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:31:17 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Fosburgh Reply-To: jef53313@bayou.uh.edu To: Nino Tungul Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: help! In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990301090224.00aa7710@mail.everex.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Did you run newaliases after the edits were done? Jonathan Fosburgh Geotechnician Snyder Oil Corporation Houston, TX Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498 Manager, FreeBSD Webring: http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498/computer/freebsdring.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 10: 7:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horse.supranet.net (horse.supranet.net [205.164.160.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5D4154EB for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:07:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gavinb@supranet.net) Received: from rat (rat.supranet.net [205.164.160.15]) by horse.supranet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA16255 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:06:58 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990301120402.03588390@mail.supranet.net> X-Sender: gavinb@mail.supranet.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 12:08:30 -0600 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Benjamin Gavin Subject: Seeing port translations from firewall machine Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, I have a small problem. I am running 3.0-STABLE on one of our firewall boxes. The problem that I am experiencing involves ipfw/natd port translations. I can see an internal machine on port 110 (POP3) from outside of our network just fine, I can also see the machine just fine on the internal side. However, I am unable to see the internal machine from the firewall server itself. This presents a problem from the internal side for mobile sales people that want to keep the external name for the mail server in their email setup. I just have one simple question: How do you get the port translations to take effect for packets coming from the firewall itself? Is this a special setting in NATd? If so, what are the settings necessary? OK, so it's 3 questions. TIA, Ben Gavin /--------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Benjamin Gavin - Senior Consultant *********** NO SPAM!! ************ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 12:32: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F3D15389 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:29:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA00559; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:22:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199903012022.MAA00559@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: John Fieber Cc: Kris Zentner , Edwin Culp , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new printer driver (nlpt0) woes In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 Mar 1999 09:16:37 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 12:22:27 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > It used to be that I could use a port as both printer port and as > a network port without reconfiguration. Now it appears as though > I have to reconfigure, recompile and reboot to do the same? I'm > not sure that represent progress. There is work underway to address the issue without otherwise seriously degrading the interrupt performance of the system. The presence of PPP or slip in the system will normally also mask these symptoms. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 13:51:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from regret.globalserve.net (regret.globalserve.net [209.90.144.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E548153F9 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 13:49:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dm@regret.globalserve.net) Received: (from dm@localhost) by regret.globalserve.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA01535 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 18:00:58 GMT (envelope-from dm) Message-ID: <19990301180057.A1489@globalserve.net> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 18:00:57 +0000 From: "Dan - Sr. Admin" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Wierd soundcard issue. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings, I happened to notice now that whenever I try to run an application that accesses the soundcard, I get the kernel messages of a possible IRQ/DRQ conflict. This is interesting, because my hardware configuration has not changed. Plug n pray is naturally turned off in the bios, and I have allocated the IRQ and DMAs that the soundcard uses to ISA devices. It's a case of working one day and not the next. Ideas? -- Dan Moschuk (TFreak!dm@globalserve.net) Senior Systems/Network Administrator Globalserve Communications Inc., a Primus Canada Company "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 16:11:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aniwa.sky (p11-max8.wlg.ihug.co.nz [209.79.142.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA90155E3 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:11:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@squiz.co.nz) Received: from aniwa.sky (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aniwa.sky (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA09186; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:10:34 +1300 (NZDT) Message-Id: <199903020010.NAA09186@aniwa.sky> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Tom , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:10:36 -0800." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 13:10:34 +1300 From: Andrew McNaughton Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG tom@uniserve.com said: > On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Andrew McNaughton wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 09:57:44PM -0600, a little birdie told me > > > that David Kelly remarked > > > > > > > > But Friday night was getting half this thruput. Fired up X and repeated. > > > > Essentially the same results. Then fired up rc5des, which is niced and > > > > fell to an average of 185k/sec. Snipped from top: > > > > > > > > 294 dkelly 105 20 740K 520K RUN 9:58 97.95% 97.95% rc5des > > > > > > One thing to bear in mind is that a process nice'd to 20 still gets CPU > > > time allotted. I always idprio rc5des and friends. For instance, in > > > this case, run (as root, I think you have to) > > > idprio 31 -294 > > > > > > Then it'll show up as nice 52, and ONLY use idle CPU cycles, instead of > > > having an (albeit small) slice of cycles always allocated it. > > > > > > No, I don't think it's 'good' that nice'd to 20 it slows the tape by that > > > much, but this is at least a partial workaround (and the better way to do > > > it IMO anyway). > > > > Does the tape process get niced also then? Is the nice setting > > reasonable? If not then why is rc5des allowed to slow it so much? > > > > I don't imagine that dd to tape would need that much CPU. I'd expect > > it to bottleneck on IO. Is it something to do with needing very small > > chunks of CPU time and running into lots of small waits for the > > kernel's CPU time allocation? > > Maybe, maybe not. There are device driver issues with scheduling and > CPU utilization, and with block sizes, and buffering capacity of the > driver and device. Also an IO bound process will yield to the scheduler a > lot, and since rc5des is probably never blocked, and it will always take > slice. If you tape requires another block at that moment, it is just > going to have to wait. So, if rc5des is idprio'ed and the tape process blocks on IO, the rc5des process doesn't run? Or does the tape process just get control back quicker when the IO block goes away? Do you know where I could find detailed docs on this? The man pages fall short. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 17:23: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E70B7151AF for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:23:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 10HdtN-0001zM-00; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:22:37 -0800 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:22:34 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Andrew McNaughton Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-Reply-To: <199903020010.NAA09186@aniwa.sky> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Andrew McNaughton wrote: > > Maybe, maybe not. There are device driver issues with scheduling and > > CPU utilization, and with block sizes, and buffering capacity of the > > driver and device. Also an IO bound process will yield to the scheduler a > > lot, and since rc5des is probably never blocked, and it will always take > > slice. If you tape requires another block at that moment, it is just > > going to have to wait. > > So, if rc5des is idprio'ed and the tape process blocks on IO, the > rc5des process doesn't run? Or does the tape process just get control > back quicker when the IO block goes away? I was talking about niced processes. The realtime scheduling used by idprio/rtprio is completely different. > Do you know where I could find detailed docs on this? The man pages > fall short. I'm not sure. > Andrew Tom Systems Support Uniserve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 17:41:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu (Dorm-36314.RH.UH.EDU [129.7.141.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621321536F for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:41:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) Received: from localhost (wotan@localhost) by dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA55468 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:41:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:41:06 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Fosburgh Reply-To: jef53313@bayou.uh.edu To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Monthly run garbled Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anyone able to offer an explanation as to why this output is illegible? Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 05:30:01 -0600 (CST) From: Charlie Root To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Subject: dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu monthly run output Doing login accounting: =09ttyv2 427496.51 =09ot 215581.74 =09ttyv1 172279.43 =093 88784.72 =091 88784.66 =09root 0.02 =09n 0.01 =091.1 0.01 =DD=D86~ 0.00 =CE6~ 0.00 =CE6ttyv0 0.00 =8A=BF6ttyv3 0.00 =09=FE=CB=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=FE=99=D46~ 0.00 =09=FE1=D76ttyp1 0.00 =09=FC=F4=C46~ 0.00 =09=FC=C5=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=FC=AC=CD6ttyp4 0.00 =09=FC=A6=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09=FC=06=C56ttyv4 0.00 =09=FB=B3=BF6ttyv0 0.00 =09=FB=9E=D86ttyv8 0.00 =09=FBQ=C36ttyv5 0.00 =09=FB =D76ttyp8 -266480.30 =09=F9=AF=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09=F91=D76ttyp6 0.00 =09=F7=99=BF6ttyv3 0.00 =09=F7=09=C56ttyv1 0.00 =09=F5=DC=D86~ 0.00 =09=F5=DC=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=F5=DC=D86ttyv1 0.00 =09=F5=DC=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=F4=D8=BF=EFttyp6 0.00 =09=F4=D8=BF=EFttyp1 0.00 =09=F4g=C76ttyv4 0.00 =09=F3=DF=D96ttyv1 0.00 =09=F3=B8=D56~ 0.00 =09=F3=B8=D56ttyv8 0.00 =09=F3=B8=D56ttyv4 0.00 =09=F3=B8=D56ttyv2 0.00 =09=F3=B8=D56ttyv0 0.00 =09=F2=99=D46ttyv0 0.00 =09=EF(=CB6ttyp4 0.00 =09=EE=B8=D56ttyv1 0.00 =09=EE=98=D46~ 0.00 =09=ED=CC=D86ttyv1 0.00 =09=ED=C5=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=EB=D3=C46ttyv2 0.00 =09=EB=C1=D56ttyv4 0.00 =09=EA=02=CE6~ 0.00 =09=E9=C0=CF6ttyv4 0.00 =09=E8=BB=D56ttyv1 0.00 =09=E7=D6=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=E7$=CB6ftp56548 0.00 =09=E5=C1=D56ttyv8 0.00 =09=E4=BB=D56ttyv0 0.00 =09=E4=09=C56ttyv9 0.00 =09=E3=0E=CE6~ 0.00 =09=E1=F6=C46~ 0.00 =09=E1=F6=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09=DE=F9=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09=DD=02=CE6ttyv0 0.00 =09=DC=F6=C46ttyv2 0.00 =09=DC=D4=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=DC=D4=D86ttyp1 0.00 =09=DB=F2=C46~ 0.00 =09=DB=D7=D86~ 0.00 =09=D9=F9=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09=D9=E3=C06~ 0.00 =09=D9=D0=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09=D9=98=D46ttyv0 0.00 =09=D97=D36ttyv3 0.00 =09=D8=D7=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=D7=D3=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09=D6=F3=D06ttyp1 0.00 =09=D6=D0=C56ttyv3 0.00 =09=D5x=C06~ 0.00 =09=D2=B3=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09=D2|=D46ttyp3 0.00 =09=D1/=C26ttyv2 0.00 =09=D0=B9=D56ttyv1 0.00 =09=CF=C0=CF6ttyv4 0.00 =09=CF=0C=CE6ttyv1 0.00 =09=CEO=D76ttyv3 0.00 =09=CD=D3=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09=CD=97=D46~ 0.00 =09=CD=19=D46ttyp2 0.00 =09=CC=F9=CC6ftp35377 0.00 =09=CC}=CD6ttyp4 0.00 =09=CAh=D16ttyp1 0.00 =09=C9=F5=D16ttyp1 0.00 =09=C9=B6=C36ttyv2 0.00 =09=C8=EF=C46ttyv3 0.00 =09=C7=F1=D06ttyp1 0.00 =09=C7=F1=C46~ 0.00 =09=C7=F1=C46ttyv2 0.00 =09=C7=F1=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09=C7=F1=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09=C6=D0=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09=C6=BB=D56ttyv0 0.00 =09=C4a=D16ttyp1 0.00 =09=C3=BD=CF6ttyv4 0.00 =09=C3=B9=D56ttyv0 0.00 =09=C3=0C=CE6ttyv0 0.00 =09=C2=BC=D56ttyv2 0.00 =09=C1=F1=C46ttyv3 0.00 =09=BE=AE=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09=BB=81=D46ttyp2 0.00 =09=BB =D76ttyp6 -266480.30 =09=BB=17=C76~ 0.00 =09=BB=17=C76ttyv5 0.00 =09=BB=17=C76ttyv4 0.00 =09=BB=17=C76ttyv3 0.00 =09=BB=17=C76ttyv2 0.00 =09=BB=17=C76ttyv1 0.00 =09=BB=17=C76ttyv0 0.00 =09=BA=E7=D06ttyv1 0.00 =09=BA=DD=D86~ 0.00 =09=B8=E1=D46ttyv1 0.00 =09=B8=BB=D56ttyv0 0.00 =09=B7=DE=D96~ 0.00 =09=B7=99=D46~ 0.00 =09=B6=DF=D86~ 0.00 =09=B6=D7=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=B5=F0=C46~ 0.00 =09=B5=E1=D46ttyv1 0.00 =09=B5=17=C76ttyv6 0.00 =09=B2=DE=D96ttyv0 0.00 =09=B2=99=D46ttyv0 0.00 =09=B1=DF=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=B1=14=CE6ttyv1 0.00 =09=AE=C7=D86~ 0.00 =09=AE=A5=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09=AE?=C36ttyv1 0.00 =09=AD=07=D46ttyp1 0.00 =09=AC=DE=D96~ 0.00 =09=AC=B1=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09=AB=DD=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=AB=AA=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09=A9=1F=C36ttyv1 0.00 =09=A7=B5=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09=A6=C1=D86~ 0.00 =09=A6=C1=D86ttyv1 0.00 =09=A6=C1=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=A6=96=D46~ 0.00 =09=A6=96=D46ttyv8 0.00 =09=A6=96=D46ttyv5 0.00 =09=A6=96=D46ttyv4 0.00 =09=A6=96=D46ttyv3 0.00 =09=A6=96=D46ttyv2 0.00 =09=A6=96=D46ttyv0 0.00 =09=A5=AE=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09=A4=AC=D86ttyv1 0.00 =09=A4=3D=D76ttyv5 0.00 =09=A2=E0=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=A1=96=D46ttyv1 0.00 =09=A0=C1=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=A0=13=CE6ttyv8 0.00 =09=9F=98=D46~ 0.00 =09=9E}=C26ttyv1 0.00 =09=9E=06=CE6~ 0.00 =09=9E=01=C56ttyv3 0.00 =09=9D=DE=D96ttyv0 0.00 =09=9D=B8=CF6~ 0.00 =09=9D=9F=CC6ttyv8 0.00 =09=9C=E0=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=9C=9A=D46ttyv4 0.00 =09=9C=97=D46~ 0.00 =09=9B=AA=C06ftp1206 0.00 =09=9A=BA=BF6ttyv1 0.00 =09=9A=B8=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09=9A=98=D46ttyv0 0.00 =09=99F=D46ttyp2 0.00 =09=997=C76ttyv4 0.00 =09=98=C5=D86~ 0.00 =09=97=BB=CF6~ 0.00 =09=96=CA=C46~ 0.00 =09=93=C5=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=93=BB=CF6ttyv8 0.00 =09=93=BB=CF6ttyv5 0.00 =09=93=BB=CF6ttyv4 0.00 =09=92=EE=D66ttyp1 0.00 =09=92=E1=D86ttyv1 0.00 =09=92=BB=CF6ttyv2 0.00 =09=92=BB=CF6ttyv1 0.00 =09=92=BB=CF6ttyv0 0.00 =09=92=BB=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09=92=17=CE6ttyv1 0.00 =09=90=01=CB6ttyp4 0.00 =09=8F=CC=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=8D=C5=D86~ 0.00 =09=8A=DB=C46~ 0.00 =09=88=F6=C46~ 0.00 =09=87=D5=D96ttyv8 0.00 =09=87=AC=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=879=D46ttyp3 0.00 =09=86=E0=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=86=BC=CF6ttyv2 0.00 =09=86=9F=BF6ttyv1 0.00 =09=86=06=CE6ttyv0 0.00 =09=85=AF=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09=82=BC=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09=82%=C36ttyv2 0.00 =09=81=CC=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09=80=DB=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09=80$=D36ttyp1 0.00 =09=7F=C4=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09~&=D16ftp37356 0.00 =09}=19=C76ttyv2 0.00 =09{=18=C76ttyv1 0.00 =09x=DC=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09x=D3=C46~ 0.00 =09x=D3=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09wotan 0.00 =09v=E0=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09u=EC=D46ttyv2 0.00 =09u=DC=D46ttyv1 0.00 =09u=CD=C56~ 0.00 =09tcp -0.00 =09t8=CE6ttyv2 0.00 =09r=D3=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09q=CD=C56ttyv1 0.00 =09q=C8=CF6ttyv5 0.00 =09q=11=CE6~ 0.00 =09p=FA=CD6~ 0.00 =09p=F6=C46ttyv2 0.00 =09p=D1=D86ttyp1 0.00 =09p=88=CD6ttyp4 0.00 =09p=11=CE6ttyv1 0.00 =09p=11=CE6ttyv0 0.00 =09o=8B=CC6ttyp4 0.00 =09n=F2=C96ttyv5 0.00 =09n=D1=C56ttyv5 0.00 =09m=C7=D16ttyp2 0.00 =09l=B4=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09j=FA=CD6ttyv0 0.00 =09j=F6=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09j=18=C76ttyv0 0.00 =09i=C8=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09e=DC=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09down 0.00 =09d_=CA6ttyv6 0.00 =09b=E0=D96ttyv2 0.00 =09a=C5=BF6ttyv0 0.00 =09a=A2=C06ttyv0 0.00 =09`=BA=D56~ 0.00 =09` =09]=E9=C96ttyp4 0.00 =09]=AE=D76~ 0.00 =09[=FC=C06ttyv2 0.00 =09[=9A=D46ttyv8 0.00 =09[ =09ZS=D86~ 0.00 =09Y=B4=CF6ttyp7 0.00 =09Y=98=D46~ 0.00 =09Xw=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09X9=C06~ 0.00 =09Wy=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09U=B3=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09R=FB=C46~ 0.00 =09R=FB=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09R!=C26ttyv8 0.00 =09Q=FD=C46ttyv2 0.00 =09P=FC=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09O=98=D46ttyv0 0.00 =09N=DF=C46ttyv2 0.00 =09N=D1=C46~ 0.00 =09M=FB=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09M$=D46ttyp1 0.00 =09L=9A=D46ttyv0 0.00 =09L=13=CE6ttyv4 0.00 =09L=08=C56ttyv8 0.00 =09L=06=CB6ttyp4 0.00 =09K$=C76ttyv3 0.00 =09J=FC=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09J=D0=C56ttyv2 0.00 =09J)=CB6ttyv7 0.00 =09H=8D=D56~ 0.00 =09H=87=D96ttyv5 0.00 =09H=08=C56ttyv4 0.00 =09E=D1=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09D=C7=D16ftp39060 0.00 =09D=03=CE6~ 0.00 =09B=87=D96ftp34519 0.00 =09B=3D=D76ttyp3 0.00 =09B=13=CE6ttyv0 0.00 =09A=D1=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09@=CF=C56~ 0.00 =09@=CF=C56ttyv9 0.00 =09@=CF=C56ttyv8 0.00 =09@=CF=C56ttyv3 0.00 =09@=CF=C56ttyv2 0.00 =09@=CF=C56ttyv1 0.00 =09@=CF=C56ttyv0 0.00 =09?=03=CE6ttyv0 0.00 =09=3D=D0=C56ttyv1 0.00 =09;=CF=C56ttyv4 0.00 =09;=A1=BF6ttyv2 0.00 =098=F4=C56~ 0.00 =097=D1=C56ttyv4 0.00 =097e=D06ttyp1 0.00 =096=D1=C46ttyv1 0.00 =095=D0=C56ttyv0 0.00 =094=FF=CD6~ 0.00 =094=FF=CD6ttyv8 0.00 =094=FF=CD6ttyv7 0.00 =094=FF=CD6ttyv6 0.00 =094=FF=CD6ttyv5 0.00 =094=FF=CD6ttyv3 0.00 =094=FF=CD6ttyv2 0.00 =094=FF=CD6ttyv1 0.00 =094=FF=CD6ttyv0 0.00 =094=DA=D96~ 0.00 =094!=D76ttyp8 0.00 =093=BC=CF6ttyv1 0.00 =09/=C5=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09/=AE=D46ttyv1 0.00 =09/=AC=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09.=FF=CD6ttyv4 0.00 =09-=C3=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09,=CF=D86ttyp1 0.00 =09*=DB=C46~ 0.00 =09*=DB=C46ttyv1 0.00 =09*=DB=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09*2=D76ttyp5 0.00 =09)=9C=BF6ttyv8 0.00 =09(=D9=BF6~ 0.00 =09(=AB=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09'=E0=D96ttyv4 0.00 =09%=DB=C46ttyv2 0.00 =09%=BC=CF6ttyv8 0.00 =09"h=C76ttyv4 0.00 =09"2=CE6ttyv5 0.00 =09=1F=E1=C06ttyv0 0.00 =09=1E2=CE6ttyv1 0.00 =09=1D=E7=D06ttyv1 0.00 =09=1Bw=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09=1B=02=C56ttyv4 0.00 =09=17=C7=D56ttyp1 0.00 =09=17=C4=CF6ftp14719 0.00 =09=17h=C76ttyv4 0.00 =09=16=DF=D96ttyv8 0.00 =09=15~=CD6ttyp4 0.00 =09=14=E2=D46ttyv1 0.00 =09=14=AD=CF6ttyp5 0.00 =09=13=9A=D46~ 0.00 =09=12=B0=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09=10=DC=C46~ 0.00 =09=0F=B6=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09=0E=FA=C46~ 0.00 =09=0E=C0=D86~ 0.00 =09=0E=B1=CD6ttyp4 0.00 =09=0E=9A=D46ttyv0 0.00 =09=0E-=C76ttyv4 0.00 =09=0B=DC=C46ttyv0 0.00 =09=0B=D5=C46~ 0.00 =09=09=BB=D56~ 0.00 =09=09=BB=D56ttyv0 0.00 =09=08=C4=CF6ttyp6 0.00 =09=08=BC=CF6ttyv0 0.00 =09=07=FA=CC6ftp35381 0.00 =09=07=DF=D96ttyv0 0.00 =09=05=E0=C56ttyv6 0.00 =09=04=BB=D56ttyv1 0.00 =09=04=82=D46~ 0.00 =09=03=CC=D86~ 0.00 =09=03=CC=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=02=B2=CD6ttyv0 0.00 =09=01=9F=D86~ 0.00 =09=01=9F=D86ttyv5 0.00 =09=01=9F=D86ttyv4 0.00 =09=01=9F=D86ttyv3 0.00 =09=01=9F=D86ttyv2 0.00 =09=01=9F=D86ttyv1 0.00 =09=01=9F=D86ttyv0 0.00 =09 =09 =09~ -82758.18 =09total -179245.71 =09=EF=F9=CC6ftp35381mud -215252.64 =09=EC=C0=CF6ftp14719wota -215252.64 =09=D1=F1=D06ttyp1 -215252.64 =09=D0=E6=CC6ftp35377wota -215252.64 =09=BF=E7=D06ttyp1 -215252.64 =09=BD=E6=D86ftp34519wota -215252.64 =09=0E=C7=D16ftp39060ftp -215252.64 =09=F2=C2=D56ttyp1 -215307.25 =09=A8h=CB6ttyp4 -215307.25 =09=85=F6=D16ttyp1 -215307.25 =09%h=C76ttyp4 -215307.25 =09=F0=F3=D06ftp37356ftp -215344.16 =09ttyv4 -255145.33 =09ttyv8 -255146.28 =09ttyv9 -255192.21 =09ttyv5 -255213.39 =09=EC}=CD6ttyp4 -266480.30 =09=DDE=D46ttyp2 -266480.30 =09=D3{=D46ttyp3 -266480.30 =09=C8=19=D46ttyp2 -266480.30 =09=BC=93=D16ttyp1 -266480.30 =09=A6=94=D16ttyp2 -266480.30 =09=9F=88=CD6ttyp4 -266480.30 =09=95=A9=D66ttyp3 -266480.30 =09=92=B4=D66ttyp5 -266480.30 =09=8B&=D16ttyp1 -266480.30 =09k=03=CB6ttyp4 -266480.30 =09dg=D16ttyp1 -266480.30 =09c=D8=D56ttyp1 -266480.30 =09Z=88=CD6ttyp4 -266480.30 =09Lc=CA6ttyp4 -266480.30 =09H.=D46ttyp1 -266480.30 =09A$=D46ttyp3 -266480.30 =09@{=D46ttyp2 -266480.30 =09?$=D46ttyp1 -266480.30 =09.!=D76ttyp1 -266480.30 =09=1F=7F=D36ttyp1 -266480.30 =09=1A=FA=CC6ttyp4 -266480.30 =09ttyv0 -337956.29 =094 -463346.14 =092 -463346.15 =09=A8=AE=CF6ttyp5 -486808.35 =09=9E=C3=CF6ttyp6 -486808.35 =09=81=10=CB6ftp56548wota -486808.35 =09a=AF=CF6ttyp6 -486808.35 =09[w=CF6ttyp5 -486808.35 =096w=CF6ttyp5 -486808.35 =09=0F\=CE6ttyp5 -486808.35 =09=08=B4=CF6ttyp7 -486808.35 =09=03%=CB6ttyp4 -486808.35 =09ttyv3 -510387.72 =090 -524168.91 =09=FF=AF=CF6ttyp6 -537966.96 =09=FB=C0=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09=F7=B1=CF6ttyp6 -537966.96 =09=E5=B3=CF6ttyp6 -537966.96 =09=E1y=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09=CC=C6=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09=BF=AF=CF6ttyp6 -537966.96 =09=B3=A5=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09=B0=AA=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09=AB=B3=CF6ttyp6 -537966.96 =09=A9=B5=CF6ttyp6 -537966.96 =09{=C7=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09x=BC=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09`=B5=CF6ttyp6 -537966.96 =09^=C7=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09)=AB=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09=19=B0=CF6ttyp6 -537966.96 =09=16=AD=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09=11=B6=CF6ttyp6 -537966.96 =09=09=A7=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =09=02=AF=CF6ttyp5 -537966.96 =099 -552130.86 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 17:45:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shemp.palomine.net (shemp.palomine.net [205.198.88.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4865F14C9B for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:45:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjohnson@palomine.net) Received: (qmail 20792 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Mar 1999 01:45:38 -0000 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 20:45:38 -0500 From: Chris Johnson To: jef53313@bayou.uh.edu Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Monthly run garbled Message-ID: <19990301204538.A20778@palomine.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: ; from Jonathan Fosburgh on Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 07:41:06PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 07:41:06PM -0600, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: > Anyone able to offer an explanation as to why this output is illegible? > > > Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 05:30:01 -0600 (CST) > From: Charlie Root > To: undisclosed-recipients: ; > Subject: dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu monthly run output > > Doing login accounting: > ttyv2 427496.51 > ot 215581.74 > ttyv1 172279.43 > 3 88784.72 > 1 88784.66 > root 0.02 > n 0.01 > 1.1 0.01 > ÝØ6~ 0.00 > Î6~ 0.00 > Î6ttyv0 0.00 > Š¿6ttyv3 0.00 > þËØ6ttyv0 0.00 My guess: you upgraded your system some time during the month, and the format of wtmp changed. Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 17:57: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu (Dorm-36314.RH.UH.EDU [129.7.141.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6012155C4 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:57:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) Received: from localhost (wotan@localhost) by dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA55503; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:56:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:56:45 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Fosburgh Reply-To: jef53313@bayou.uh.edu To: Chris Johnson Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Monthly run garbled In-Reply-To: <19990301204538.A20778@palomine.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Chris Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 07:41:06PM -0600, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: > > Anyone able to offer an explanation as to why this output is illegible? > >=20 > >=20 > > Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 05:30:01 -0600 (CST) > > From: Charlie Root > > To: undisclosed-recipients: ; > > Subject: dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu monthly run output > >=20 > > Doing login accounting: > > =09ttyv2 427496.51 > > =09ot 215581.74 > > =09ttyv1 172279.43 > > =093 88784.72 > > =091 88784.66 > > =09root 0.02 > > =09n 0.01 > > =091.1 0.01 > > =DD=D86~ 0.00 > > =CE6~ 0.00 > > =CE6ttyv0 0.00 > > =8A=BF6ttyv3 0.00 > > =09=FE=CB=D86ttyv0 0.00 >=20 > My guess: you upgraded your system some time during the month, and the fo= rmat > of wtmp changed. I take it something like that happened between 2.2.8 and 3.1. Yeah, that would be it I suppose. Jonathan Fosburgh Geotechnician Snyder Oil Corporation Houston, TX Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498 Manager, FreeBSD Webring:=20 http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498/computer/freebsdring.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 18:13:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EC614C18 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 18:13:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by misha.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id VAA16543 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 21:13:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <199903020213.VAA16543@misha.cisco.com> Subject: 2.2.6 to 2.2.8 To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 21:13:28 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL52 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm having some problems upgrading from 2.2.6 to 2.2.8. For one, it seems the cz-driver has vanished. Is that true? What to use instead? Second, the kernel does not attach drivers to the PCI devices -- it identifies them as (ide) (ACER something), (ethernet) -- that's the vx0, and (comms) -- the Cyclades board, which is driven by the cz-driver in 2.2.6 kernel. But, like I said, the kernel says "no driver attached" and the machine comes up without cy/cz, without Ethernet and with ISA IDE. The machine has Cyrix 6x86 CPU... I tried kernels with and without the pnp support -- same thing. Any clues? Thanks in advance! -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 18:43:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEBA14C0D for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 18:43:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-216-180-15-244.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.15.244]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA28394; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 20:43:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA02030; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 20:43:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199903020243.UAA02030@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-reply-to: Message from "Matthew D. Fuller" of "Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:52:43 CST." <19990228225243.W3203@futuresouth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 20:43:09 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Matthew D. Fuller" writes: > On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 09:57:44PM -0600, a little birdie told me > that David Kelly remarked > > > > But Friday night was getting half this thruput. Fired up X and repeated. > > Essentially the same results. Then fired up rc5des, which is niced and > > fell to an average of 185k/sec. Snipped from top: > > > > 294 dkelly 105 20 740K 520K RUN 9:58 97.95% 97.95% rc5des > > One thing to bear in mind is that a process nice'd to 20 still gets CPU > time allotted. I always idprio rc5des and friends. For instance, in > this case, run (as root, I think you have to) > idprio 31 -294 > > Then it'll show up as nice 52, and ONLY use idle CPU cycles, instead of > having an (albeit small) slice of cycles always allocated it. There is more to the story than I'm letting on just yet as I'm trying to keep things simple and then rc5des popped up as a quick example to demonstrate the problem. > No, I don't think it's 'good' that nice'd to 20 it slows the tape by that > much, but this is at least a partial workaround (and the better way to do > it IMO anyway). > > Have you tried running rc5des under 2.2.5 and seeing what speed you got? I used to run rc5des under 2.2.* on this machine and thought I got full tape speeds there. Have a P-133 on my desk at work with 2.2.8 that I can put a 400k/sec DDS-1 drive on, and rc5des, and see what happens. But back to the long story: What I'm trying to do is use FreeBSD as a tape duplication host. At work I have a Feb 8 3.0 system with (4) DDS-3 tape drives attached, two per SCSI bus, HD on a 3rd SCSI (it got that way because that's what cables and controllers I had laying around, The Powers That Be purchased $4k in tape drives and no cables.) When reading a DDS-3 tape and nothing else going on, "systat -v" shows the tape device averaging around 1.04M/sec. Having dd'ed an image of this tape to disk, using dd the other way to write is averaging 550k/ sec. Oh, but in this case I'm writing the image to all 4 tape drives at once. Rates reported by "systat -v" are wildly fluxuating. Thruput is 550k/sec averaged over 6G. Am thinking the situation where I'm writing the same data to 4 tape drives at once is similar to what happens when rc5des consumes all the spare CPU cycles. Writing to DDS-1 tapes, 4 at once, usually shows a stable 700k/sec for each tape drive. Sometimes one gets behind. Then the data rate off the HD climbs from 700k/sec. CPU utilization on a P-II 233 MHz is about 8% when writing all 4 tape drives. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 18:45:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C4515472 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 18:45:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-216-180-15-244.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.15.244]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA09760; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 20:44:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA02047; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 20:44:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199903020244.UAA02047@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Andrew McNaughton Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-reply-to: Message from Andrew McNaughton of "Mon, 01 Mar 1999 19:03:40 +1300." <199903010603.TAA09311@aniwa.sky> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 20:44:51 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andrew McNaughton writes: > > Does the tape process get niced also then? No. > Is the nice setting reasonable? Yes. > If not then why is rc5des allowed to slow it so much? The picture that I'm getting is a single block is written to the tape drive at a time. When the tape drive is ready for another block rc5des's current time slice is not aborted but allowed to complete before dd gets a time slice to queue another block to the tape. The drive at home has 1M of internal RAM, the DDS-3 drives at work have 2M buffers. It would appear FreeBSD doesn't make use of these buffers. > I don't imagine that dd to tape would need that much CPU. I'd expect > it to bottleneck on IO. Is it something to do with needing very small > chunks of CPU t ime and running into lots of small waits for the > kernel's CPU time allocation? A couple of percent. Using dd to read /dev/zero and write /dev/null yields 208M/sec w/o rc5des running, 203M/sec with, writing 100000 blocks of 10k (roughly 1G) so the test runs long enough to be valid. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 19:13:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cobra.net (ns.cobra.net [209.201.88.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1F9115446 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:13:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nitehawk@cobra.net) Received: (qmail 14476 invoked by uid 1001); 1 Mar 1999 22:15:10 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Mar 1999 22:15:10 -0000 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 22:15:10 +0000 (GMT) From: Cobra Networking To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: reversing IPs Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello All, =09Im sure this might not be the right list for this question but hoping someone might be able to help me with it: Ok I was allotted 28 IPs from my provider and was given reversal authority over these IPs now all they told me was they use nstype authority for their classless IPs. I have no idea what nstype authority means and hoping someone here might know and can lead me in the right direction on how I can go about setting this up. Im running FBSD 2.2.8 Generic and I beleive its Bind 4 hope this helps. Thanx, =E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6= =E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6 Cobra Networking Thomas C. Edwards Email: nitehawk@cobra.net http://www.cobra.net =E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6= =E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6=E6 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 20: 0:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF45314C34 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 20:00:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 10HgLH-00034h-00; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:59:35 -0800 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:59:32 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: David Kelly Cc: Andrew McNaughton , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-Reply-To: <199903020244.UAA02047@nospam.hiwaay.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, David Kelly wrote: > Andrew McNaughton writes: > > > > Does the tape process get niced also then? > > No. > > > Is the nice setting reasonable? > > Yes. > > > If not then why is rc5des allowed to slow it so much? > > The picture that I'm getting is a single block is written to the tape > drive at a time. When the tape drive is ready for another block > rc5des's current time slice is not aborted but allowed to complete > before dd gets a time slice to queue another block to the tape. > > The drive at home has 1M of internal RAM, the DDS-3 drives at work have > 2M buffers. It would appear FreeBSD doesn't make use of these buffers. I don't see how that could be. SCSI tapes are SCSI tapes. Any buffering done by the device should be invisible. There might be a SCSI mode page flag to turn it on or off though. > > I don't imagine that dd to tape would need that much CPU. I'd expect > > it to bottleneck on IO. Is it something to do with needing very small > > chunks of CPU t ime and running into lots of small waits for the > > kernel's CPU time allocation? > > A couple of percent. Using dd to read /dev/zero and write /dev/null > yields 208M/sec w/o rc5des running, 203M/sec with, writing 100000 > blocks of 10k (roughly 1G) so the test runs long enough to be valid. Those figures are pretty weird. 208MB/s or ? That is a pretty fast tape drive. /dev/zero isn't a good test source due to drive compression and encoding stuff. > -- > David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net > ===================================================================== > The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its > capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > Tom Systems Support Uniserve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 1 23:24:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost2.u.washington.edu (mailhost2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCD514C3D; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 23:24:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from darxpryte@u.washington.edu) Received: from cs210-70.spmodem.washington.edu (cs210-70.spmodem.washington.edu [140.142.172.71]) by mailhost2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id XAA22859; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 23:23:48 -0800 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 23:25:55 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Zentner To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: problems with majordomo? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been trying to subscribe to several freebsd lists among them freebsd-stable-digest and freebsd-announce. Majordomo isn't giving me any answers to my queries. gabrielle{113}: mail majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: subscribe freebsd-announce subscribe freebsd-stable-digest EOT Something wrong with majordomo? Perhaps my domain is ignored? ========================================================================== Kristopher Zentner | "Would you tell me, please, which Aspiring Linguist | way I ought to go from here?" FreeBSD Advocate | "That depends a great deal on kzentner@u.washington.edu | where you want to go." said the Cat ========================================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 0:56:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.triplan.com (unknown [62.156.252.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE4A14BDD for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 00:56:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Marc.Gutschner@Triplan.COM) Received: from Triplan.COM (tri05.tri_bs_supp.triplan.com [192.168.1.153]) by ns.triplan.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA28189 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 10:50:51 +0100 Message-ID: <36DBA7C9.86359FFE@Triplan.COM> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 09:56:41 +0100 From: Marc Gutschner Organization: Triplan Ingenieur GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Is the QLogic 1041 supported? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, since I'm looking for a Wide/Differential HBA for my FreeBSD server at home I came across the QLogic 1041. The release notes say that 1020 and 1040 HBAs are supported. Is the 1041 sufficently similar to the 1040 to be supported by the QLogic driver? MTIA, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 3:23:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30D714CD5 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 03:23:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id DAA27450; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 03:22:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 03:22:29 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tagged queueing Message-ID: <19990302032229.A27401@relay.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com References: <19990219233927.A4953@ucb.crimea.ua> <199902201930.MAA13801@panzer.plutotech.com> <19990222140147.A2015@ucb.crimea.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: <19990222140147.A2015@ucb.crimea.ua>; from Ruslan Ermilov on Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 02:01:47PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 02:01:47PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Andrew Gallatin reported that his western digital enterprise drives only > > get 1.5MB/sec throughput with tagged queueing turned on, and 8MB/sec > > throughput with tagged queueing turned off. Therefore, we have a quirk > > entry in the transport layer that disables tagged queueing for those > > drives. ..snip.. > Ken, will you revert your change in cam_xpt.c,v 1.11 for WD enterprise drives > or should I open PR? I agree that WD enterprise drives should have Tagged Queueing turned off by default. I did extensive test on a Dell PII-300Mhz with 128meg RAM and: FreeBSD 3.1-19990218-STABLE ahc0: rev 0x00 int a irq 10 on pci0.13.0 ahc0: aic7880 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 20.0MB/s transfers (10.0MHz, offset 8, 16bit) da0: 4095MB (8388314 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 522C) I only got decent performance with TQ=off and WCE=on: noWCE 250 2115 13.3 1601 2.9 1802 4.7 9903 64.0 9908 15.7 152.0 2.6 withWCE 250 9719 61.0 9258 16.8 3274 8.4 9694 62.7 9898 15.8 153.6 2.6 With TQ=on, WCE didn't make much difference: tag_64 250 2879 18.0 1866 3.1 2655 6.2 9774 63.3 9732 11.1 154.2 2.2 tag_60 250 3279 20.4 2218 3.7 2850 6.7 9688 62.7 9726 11.1 151.8 2.2 tag_54 250 3190 19.9 2199 3.6 2820 6.6 9564 61.9 9580 11.0 153.2 2.2 tag_48 250 2871 17.9 2345 3.9 2768 6.4 9700 62.7 9716 11.0 156.6 2.2 tag_40 250 3060 19.1 2062 3.4 2805 6.5 9688 62.6 9686 11.0 157.3 2.2 tag_32 250 3926 24.4 2021 3.4 2741 6.3 9552 61.8 9574 10.9 156.6 2.2 tag_24 250 3331 20.7 1953 3.2 2742 6.3 9709 63.0 9686 11.0 160.3 2.3 tag_16 250 3361 21.0 2445 4.1 2621 5.9 9697 62.7 9538 10.8 155.3 2.2 tag_8 250 3665 22.7 2741 5.0 2430 6.7 9691 62.8 9719 16.4 157.4 2.8 tag_6 250 4184 26.0 2373 4.2 2438 6.7 9688 62.8 9713 16.3 156.5 2.8 tag_4 250 3948 24.5 2953 5.4 2306 6.3 9706 63.2 9689 16.3 155.8 2.8 tag_2 250 2963 18.4 2466 4.4 2502 6.6 9718 63.0 9689 16.3 144.1 2.4 tag_0 250 2163 13.3 1560 2.6 2300 4.7 9029 58.2 8795 9.5 152.1 2.0 tag_64wce 250 2780 17.3 1810 3.1 2721 6.4 9885 63.9 9853 11.2 162.1 2.3 tag_60wce 250 2409 15.0 1962 3.3 2891 6.8 9868 63.9 9882 11.3 163.2 2.3 tag_54wce 250 2540 15.9 2023 3.4 2919 6.9 9837 63.8 9769 11.1 160.3 2.3 tag_48wce 250 2673 16.7 2056 3.5 2823 6.7 9875 64.0 9869 11.3 161.5 2.3 tag_40wce 250 2944 18.4 1754 2.9 2830 6.6 9868 63.9 9882 11.3 160.0 2.2 tag_32wce 250 2881 18.0 1849 3.1 2777 6.4 9834 63.7 9810 11.1 163.8 2.3 tag_24wce 250 2816 17.6 1705 2.9 2757 6.3 9872 64.0 9873 11.2 159.6 2.3 tag_16wce 250 2921 18.2 1808 3.0 2648 6.0 9878 64.0 9879 11.3 160.6 2.3 tag_8wce 250 3320 20.6 1946 3.6 2488 6.9 9749 63.3 9905 16.6 158.4 2.8 tag_6wce 250 3099 19.3 2947 5.4 2668 7.4 9881 64.2 9870 16.6 156.9 2.8 tag_4wce 250 3482 21.6 2620 4.8 2417 6.6 9853 64.0 9917 16.7 161.5 2.9 tag_2wce 250 3615 22.5 2860 5.2 2521 6.7 9673 62.9 9841 16.5 158.5 2.6 I'll provide my scripts to anyone that wants to test this on their WD enterprise drives. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 4:17:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bbs.mpcs.com (bbs.mpcs.com [209.101.88.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415CD14C1D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 04:17:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hgoldste@bbs.mpcs.com) Received: from pickle.n2wx.ampr.org (cc1017255-a.srst1.fl.home.com [24.3.122.197]) by bbs.mpcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/MPCS spamzap) with ESMTP id HAA03370; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 07:17:33 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by pickle.n2wx.ampr.org (8.9.2/8.8.2/n2wx) id HAA62055; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 07:17:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from cally.south.mpcs.com (cally.n2wx.ampr.org [172.16.0.6]) by pickle.n2wx.ampr.org (8.9.2/8.9.2/n2wx) with ESMTP id HAA62047; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 07:16:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hg@cally.n2wx.ampr.org) Received: (from hg@localhost) by cally.south.mpcs.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id HAA07105; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 07:16:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hg) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 07:16:52 -0500 (EST) From: Howard Goldstein Message-Id: <199903021216.HAA07105@cally.south.mpcs.com> To: nitehawk@cobra.net Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reversing IPs In-Reply-To: Reply-To: hgoldste@bbs.mpcs.com Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In muc.lists.freebsd.stable, you wrote: : Ok I was allotted 28 IPs from my provider and was given reversal authority : over these IPs now all they told me was they use nstype authority for : their classless IPs. I have no idea what nstype authority means and : hoping someone here might know and can lead me in the right direction on : how I can go about setting this up. RFC2317 at http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/rfc2317.html or your favorite other source of RFCs -- The ants are my friends, they're blowing in the wind To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 4:45:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from triton.kiev.sovam.com (kiev.sovam.com [194.186.143.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BA514CC5 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 04:45:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doka@triton.kiev.sovam.com) Received: from localhost (doka@localhost) by triton.kiev.sovam.com (8.9.3/0.1.2b5) with ESMTP id OAA18364 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:44:44 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:44:44 +0200 (EET) From: Vladimir Litovka To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FreeBSD hangup Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! FreeBSD hangs when trying dd to floppy greater, than floppy, image. For example dd if=boot.flp of=/dev/fd0.1440 bs=8192 makes FreeBSD to hang with further 'any key' (reset :) press. FreeBSD 3.1-19990222-STABLE. Any comments? /doka To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 6:41:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blackhelicopters.org (unknown [209.69.178.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD2E14D4A for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 06:40:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dispatch@blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from dispatch@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA21992; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:30:38 GMT (envelope-from dispatch) From: Dispatcher Message-Id: <199903020930.JAA21992@blackhelicopters.org> Subject: Re: reversing IPs In-Reply-To: from Cobra Networking at "Mar 1, 1999 10:15:10 pm" To: nitehawk@cobra.net (Cobra Networking) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:30:38 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It means that they've delegated authority for your IP numbers to your nameserver. Get a copy of _DNS & Bind_, edition 2+, from O'Reilly & Associates, for all the ugly details on this. A web search on "reverse DNS" will also give you a lot of info. This is really a DNS question, not a FreeBSD one (although FreeBSD will support what you need to do). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 7:17: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gate.lustig.com (gate.lustig.com [205.246.2.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15EDE14D89 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 07:15:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barry@lustig.com) Received: (qmail 43265 invoked from network); 2 Mar 1999 15:15:44 -0000 Received: from devious.lustig.com (205.246.2.244) by gate.lustig.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 1999 15:15:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 7843 invoked by uid 1001); 2 Mar 1999 15:15:56 -0000 Message-ID: <19990302151556.7842.qmail@devious.lustig.com> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148) X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.2mach (Enhance 2.2p1) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.148.RR) From: Barry Lustig Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 10:15:55 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ypserv Reply-To: barry@Lustig.COM X-Organizations: Barry Lustig & Associates, Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm am having continual problems with ypserv on a number of my systems. They boxes are running the latest cvsup of 2.2.8. I am seeing many segv's at this point: dns5(14)# gdb /usr/sbin/ypserv-d /ypserv-d.core Core was generated by `ypserv-d'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x8be58955 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x8be58955 in ?? () #1 0x7972 in svc_getreqset (readfds=0xefbfd940) at /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/rpc/svc.c:435 #2 0x4e31 in yp_svc_run () at /usr/src/usr.sbin/ypserv/yp_main.c:145 #3 0x53e0 in main (argc=1, argv=0xefbfd9b8) at /usr/src/usr.sbin/ypserv/yp_main.c:335 (gdb) up #1 0x7972 in svc_getreqset (readfds=0xefbfd940) at /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/rpc/svc.c:435 435 if (SVC_RECV(xprt, &msg)) { I added the code from current to svc.c to check if xprt is NULL, but I'm still seeing problems. I am also getting corruption in other places and am seeing lots of child processes that aren't exiting. By the way, ypserv-d is just a ypserv that doesn't run as a daemon. I've had to run it under supervise so that a new one can get started when the old one dies. Is anyone having sucess using ypserv in a mixed Sun, SGI, AIX, BSD environment? barry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 9:31: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD54A14E03 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:27:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA30747; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:26:36 GMT Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA16507; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 10:27:37 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199903021727.KAA16507@harmony.village.org> To: Vladimir Litovka Subject: Re: FreeBSD hangup Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Mar 1999 14:44:44 +0200." References: Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 10:27:37 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Vladimir Litovka writes: : dd if=boot.flp of=/dev/fd0.1440 bs=8192 : makes FreeBSD to hang with further 'any key' (reset :) press. : FreeBSD 3.1-19990222-STABLE. Any comments? The above command will be very slow. I'd try bs=36k Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 9:35: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB5C14DC8; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:34:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from greenpeace.grondar.za (greenpeace.grondar.za [196.7.18.132]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA69075; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:34:11 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greenpeace.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA04021; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:34:09 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199903021734.TAA04021@greenpeace.grondar.za> To: Kris Zentner Cc: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with majordomo? In-Reply-To: Your message of " Mon, 01 Mar 1999 23:25:55 PST." References: Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 19:34:07 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Zentner wrote: > I've been trying to subscribe to several freebsd lists among them > freebsd-stable-digest and freebsd-announce. Majordomo isn't giving me any > answers to my queries. > > gabrielle{113}: mail majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: > subscribe freebsd-announce > subscribe freebsd-stable-digest > EOT > > Something wrong with majordomo? Perhaps my domain is ignored? Try mailing postmaster@freebsd.org. Please include actual error messages or other diagnostic info. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 9:39:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rebma.ghostwheel.com (rebma.ghostwheel.com [207.201.56.159]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83891515A; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:38:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd-stb@ghostwheel.com) Received: from avalon (avernus.ghostwheel.com [207.201.56.82] (may be forged)) by rebma.ghostwheel.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA00295; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:38:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd-stb@ghostwheel.com) Message-Id: <4.1.19990302093720.00a4fd60@pop2.ghostwheel.com> X-Sender: fbsd-stb@pop2.ghostwheel.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 09:38:32 -0800 To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" , jkh@zippy.cdrom.com From: Chris Knight Subject: Re: /etc/mail/Makefile doesn't make. Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990220204116.0094e720@pop2.ghostwheel.com> References: <19990221031607.301FD11A7B@hub.freebsd.org> <54822.919563296@zippy.cdrom.com> <54822.919563296@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 08:50 PM 2/20/99 -0800, Chris Knight wrote: >At 07:16 PM 2/20/99 -0800, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: > >> would that it was true....3.1-RELEASE has version 1.5 of the >> Makefile rather than version 1.6. 1.6 was committed on 1/31/99. > >May I ask which tree this was committed to? I just resynced against >RELENG_3 about five minutes ago, and it appears that the version in the >-STABLE tree is 1.5: > Shouldn't the /etc/mail/README also be updated ro reflect the changes to the Makefile and to sendmail.cf.additions? -ck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 10:47: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bamboo.verinet.com (bamboo.verinet.com [204.144.246.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA55F15517 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 10:46:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from allenc@bamboo.verinet.com) Received: (from allenc@localhost) by bamboo.verinet.com (8.8.8/8.7.1) id LAA29494; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 11:46:31 -0700 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 11:46:31 -0700 From: Allen Campbell Message-Id: <199903021846.LAA29494@bamboo.verinet.com> To: obrien@NUXI.com Subject: Re: Tagged queueing Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'll provide my scripts to anyone that wants to test this on their WD > enterprise drives. Please. I am running 3.1-STABLE now so my results should be more relevant and hopefully more consistent with these and others that have been observed. -- Allen Campbell allenc@verinet.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 12:20:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mortar.carlson.com (mortar.carlson.com [208.240.12.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81B314DBA for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:20:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from mortar.carlson.com (root@localhost) by mortar.carlson.com with ESMTP id PAA01722; Wed, 24 Feb 1999 15:41:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from w142844 ([172.25.99.35]) by mortar.carlson.com with SMTP id PAA01718; Wed, 24 Feb 1999 15:41:01 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <01bb01be603e$762b4a60$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: Cc: Subject: Re: CVSUP Problem Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 15:41:34 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I compiled the port. Default make all install. I believe I watched it include the X11 stuff. The old port used to include X11 by default. Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Fosburgh To: Thomas T. Veldhouse Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 3:27 PM Subject: Re: CVSUP Problem >> >> This error happens everytime unless I pass the -g switch. >> >I believe some of the packages of CVS don't allow gui, which do you have? >Jonathan Fosburgh >Geotechnician >Snyder Oil Corporation >Houston, TX > >Home Page: >http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498 >Manager, FreeBSD Webring: >http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498/computer/freebsdring.html > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 12:36:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu (Dorm-36314.RH.UH.EDU [129.7.141.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78A214E00 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:36:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) Received: from localhost (wotan@localhost) by dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA11333; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:35:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:35:54 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Fosburgh Reply-To: jef53313@bayou.uh.edu To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSUP Problem In-Reply-To: <01bb01be603e$762b4a60$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > I compiled the port. Default make all install. I believe I watched it > include the X11 stuff. The old port used to include X11 by default. > > Tom Veldhouse > veldy@visi.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Fosburgh > To: Thomas T. Veldhouse > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 3:27 PM > Subject: Re: CVSUP Problem > > > >> > >> This error happens everytime unless I pass the -g switch. > >> > >I believe some of the packages of CVS don't allow gui, which do you have? IIRC some window managers, such as fvwm, do not work with the cvs gui. Jonathan Fosburgh Geotechnician Snyder Oil Corporation Houston, TX Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498 Manager, FreeBSD Webring: http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498/computer/freebsdring.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 12:48: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mortar.carlson.com (mortar.carlson.com [208.240.12.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE02B14DAA for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:47:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from mortar.carlson.com (root@localhost) by mortar.carlson.com with ESMTP id OAA00613; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:47:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from w142844 ([172.25.99.35]) by mortar.carlson.com with SMTP id OAA00609; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:47:14 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <024a01be64ed$e6cca2b0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: Cc: Subject: Re: CVSUP Problem Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:47:34 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I didn't ever have this problem with the previous version of CVSUP. I use WindowMaker 0.51.0. It is easy to reproduce, so I wonder why nobody else has found this. I suspect most people use the command line or make update. Anyway. On a fresh install, I compiled the XFree86 3.3.3.1 port with Kerb, MD5, and all security options, also I use the SVGA server and I built the a.out libraries for compatibility with Netscape and JDK. I then built the XFree86-contrib port and then I built the cvsup port. Nothing special. It grabbed all the modula stuff and built it with no errors (that I saw). The only change from any previous configuration is the cvsup port. So it stands to reason that the new change in the cvsup port caused cvsup to break when invoked as a GUI. Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com >IIRC some window managers, such as fvwm, do not work with the cvs gui. > >Jonathan Fosburgh >Geotechnician >Snyder Oil Corporation >Houston, TX > >Home Page: >http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498 >Manager, FreeBSD Webring: >http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498/computer/freebsdring.html > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 13:53:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from expresscopy.com (caffeine.expresscopy.com [206.163.205.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF4415612 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:53:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@expresscopy.com) Received: from sumatra.expresscopy.com (sumatra.expresscopy.com [206.163.205.75]) by expresscopy.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA12278 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:53:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@expresscopy.com) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:51:54 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Herrera To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ATAPI CD-ROM no longer works Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've just cvsupped up to the latest version of 3.1-STABLE. After modifying the GENERIC kernel to match my hardware and rebooting, it no longer sees my wcd0 cdrom. At 3.0-RELEASE this worked just fine. I read through /usr/src/README and /usr/src/UPDATING, and included acd0 in my kernel config, but I don't see either device while going back through dmesg. Is this something I need to configure with pnp? I'm none too sure on how to configure devices using pnp, could someone point out some good documentation on configuring pnp devices? Thanks Dan Herrera Expresscopy.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 14: 4:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jason04.u.washington.edu (jason04.u.washington.edu [140.142.78.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D1214D26 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:04:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eroubinc@u.washington.edu) Received: from dante13.u.washington.edu (eroubinc@dante13.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.39]) by jason04.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA11372; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:03:56 -0800 Received: from localhost (eroubinc@localhost) by dante13.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.2+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA45652; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:03:55 -0800 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:03:55 -0800 (PST) From: Evgeny Roubinchtein To: Dan Herrera Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATAPI CD-ROM no longer works In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Dan Herrera wrote: >I've just cvsupped up to the latest version of 3.1-STABLE. > >After modifying the GENERIC kernel to match my hardware and >rebooting, it no longer sees my wcd0 cdrom. At 3.0-RELEASE >this worked just fine. I may be wrong on this, but I believe it should be acd0, not wcd0. I hope this helps -- Evgeny Roubinchtein, eroubinc@u.washington.edu ................... TIO: Take It Over To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 14:45:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B13F14D26 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:45:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) Received: (from smap@localhost) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA00792 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:44:49 +1100 (EST) Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma000787; Wed, 3 Mar 99 09:44:43 +1100 Received: from localhost (carl@localhost) by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA00618 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:44:43 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:44:43 +1100 (EST) From: Carl Makin X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm trying to run the ADSM backup clients for Linux under 3.1-STABLE and not having much luck. When I start any of the client executables (after branding them as linux executables) I get; Bad system call (core dumped) The machine is a P200MMX running FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE updated on Monday with the packages-3-stable linux_lib_2.6 package. I have StarOffice 5.01, Wp for Linux running fine. I'm willing to play around with it and deliver debgging information if someone can tell me what they want and how to get it! :) Carl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 15: 0:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B12114D90 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:00:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 10Hy9J-0004zZ-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:00:25 -0800 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:00:20 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Carl Makin Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Carl Makin wrote: > I'm trying to run the ADSM backup clients for Linux under 3.1-STABLE and > not having much luck. > > When I start any of the client executables (after branding them as linux > executables) I get; > > Bad system call (core dumped) > > The machine is a P200MMX running FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE updated on Monday with > the packages-3-stable linux_lib_2.6 package. > > I have StarOffice 5.01, Wp for Linux running fine. > > I'm willing to play around with it and deliver debgging information if > someone can tell me what they want and how to get it! :) Getting a backup client to work under emulation will be particularly difficult, especially with the default /compat/linux pathing. It probably won't even be able to see files outside the compat tree. > > Carl Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 15: 2:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3712314F7F for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:02:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA00433; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:02:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id PAA53280; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:02:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:02:14 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903022302.PAA53280@vashon.polstra.com> To: veldy@visi.com Subject: Re: CVSUP Problem In-Reply-To: <024a01be64ed$e6cca2b0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <024a01be64ed$e6cca2b0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com>, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > I didn't ever have this problem with the previous version of CVSUP. I use > WindowMaker 0.51.0. It is easy to reproduce, so I wonder why nobody else > has found this. I suspect most people use the command line or make update. Trust me, zillions of people use CVSup's GUI without problems. And I tested it myself many times before releasing CVSup-16.0. I already sent you one answer related to your DNS setup. Have you looked into that yet? John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." -- H. L. Mencken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 15:11:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hops.veldy.org (h-180-46.mn.mediaone.net [209.32.180.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EA814E3A for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:11:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from barley (unknown [192.168.0.1]) by hops.veldy.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1A861214; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:12:23 -0600 (CST) From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: "John Polstra" Cc: Subject: RE: CVSUP Problem Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:12:11 -0600 Message-ID: <001201be6502$1a526520$0100a8c0@barley.veldy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <199903022302.PAA53280@vashon.polstra.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks. I haven't seen the message you sent about DNS setup yet. I have been getting some of these list items out of order. I will look back and read it. I am running my own nameserver, so that could very well be it. I will look into it. It does surprise me that DNS would hose the GUI and not the commandline though. Thanks, Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com > -----Original Message----- > From: John Polstra [mailto:jdp@polstra.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 5:02 PM > To: veldy@visi.com > Cc: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: CVSUP Problem > > > In article <024a01be64ed$e6cca2b0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com>, > Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > I didn't ever have this problem with the previous version of > CVSUP. I use > > WindowMaker 0.51.0. It is easy to reproduce, so I wonder why > nobody else > > has found this. I suspect most people use the command line or > make update. > > Trust me, zillions of people use CVSup's GUI without problems. And I > tested it myself many times before releasing CVSup-16.0. > > I already sent you one answer related to your DNS setup. Have you > looked into that yet? > > John > -- > John Polstra > jdp@polstra.com > John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, > Washington USA > "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the > American public." > -- H. > L. Mencken > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 15:17:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1BE14E68 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:16:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) Received: (from smap@localhost) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA01733; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:15:58 +1100 (EST) Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma001727; Wed, 3 Mar 99 10:15:42 +1100 Received: from localhost (carl@localhost) by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA00886; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:15:42 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 10:15:41 +1100 (EST) From: Carl Makin X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au To: Tom Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Tom wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Carl Makin wrote: > > I'm trying to run the ADSM backup clients for Linux under 3.1-STABLE and > > not having much luck. > Getting a backup client to work under emulation will be particularly > difficult, especially with the default /compat/linux pathing. It probably > won't even be able to see files outside the compat tree. Is that right? So how come I can run StarOffice 5 and WP for Linux and access my home directory? Carl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 15:37:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [198.78.58.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C31314D90 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:37:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tim@futuresouth.com) Received: (from tim@localhost) by shell.futuresouth.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id RAA14078 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:36:55 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:36:55 -0600 From: Tim Tsai To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Using Linux libraries Message-ID: <19990302173655.A13794@futuresouth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We currently have a Linux box running Sybase's client software (as libraries). The box also runs Perl with the DBI::Sybase interface and sqsh, both using these libraries. Is there anyway I can get this whole environment to work under FreeBSD (any version)? I guess for sqsh, I should be able to run it under the Linux emulation (it doesn't need any other files other than the library). What about the Linux perl? Lastly, any chance of cross compiling for the Linux environment using FreeBSD - otherwise we'll have to keep the Linux box around just for development. Thanks, Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 16:10:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from world.virtual-earth.de (world.virtual-earth.de [194.231.209.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074B91556D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 16:10:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mathiasp@world.virtual-earth.de) Received: from world.virtual-earth.de (world.virtual-earth.de [194.231.209.38]) by world.virtual-earth.de (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA00942; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 01:08:58 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199903030008.BAA00942@world.virtual-earth.de> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 01:08:56 +0100 (MET) From: Mathias Picker Subject: Re: Using Linux libraries To: tim@futuresouth.com, stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <19990302173655.A13794@futuresouth.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2 Mar, Tim Tsai wrote: > We currently have a Linux box running Sybase's client software (as > libraries). The box also runs Perl with the DBI::Sybase interface and > sqsh, both using these libraries. > > Is there anyway I can get this whole environment to work under FreeBSD > (any version)? I guess for sqsh, I should be able to run it under the > Linux emulation (it doesn't need any other files other than the library). > What about the Linux perl? > > Lastly, any chance of cross compiling for the Linux environment using > FreeBSD - otherwise we'll have to keep the Linux box around just for > development. [snip] You might want to look at linux-lib, linux-devel and a new rpm from Marcel Moolenaar http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~mhmoolen/. I found this while looking for a way to get oracle/linux up and running. I've not yet tried it. Good luck. Mathias -- Mathias Picker Consultant Information Architecture Mathias.Picker@virtual-earth.de +49 172 / 89 19 381 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 16:19:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip248.houston2.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.201.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55A714D74 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 16:19:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA34701; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:20:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:20:24 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: Tim Tsai Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using Linux libraries Message-ID: <19990302182024.E31528@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: <19990302173655.A13794@futuresouth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: <19990302173655.A13794@futuresouth.com>; from Tim Tsai on Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 05:36:55PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 2, 1999, Tim Tsai put this into my mailbox: > We currently have a Linux box running Sybase's client software (as > libraries). The box also runs Perl with the DBI::Sybase interface and > sqsh, both using these libraries. > > Is there anyway I can get this whole environment to work under FreeBSD > (any version)? I guess for sqsh, I should be able to run it under the > Linux emulation (it doesn't need any other files other than the library). > What about the Linux perl? > > Lastly, any chance of cross compiling for the Linux environment using > FreeBSD - otherwise we'll have to keep the Linux box around just for > development. This belongs in FreeBSD-questions (Cc:ed there). Firstly, I'm not sure if Sybase supports FreeBSD. Is their software open source? Secondly, Perl is not machine-specific. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -Chris -- Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" In 1750, Isaac Newton became discouraged after having fallen up a flight of stairs. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 16:46:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 004D814CD2 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 16:46:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 10HznS-000760-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 16:45:58 -0800 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 16:45:55 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Tim Tsai Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using Linux libraries In-Reply-To: <19990302173655.A13794@futuresouth.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Tim Tsai wrote: > We currently have a Linux box running Sybase's client software (as > libraries). The box also runs Perl with the DBI::Sybase interface and > sqsh, both using these libraries. > > Is there anyway I can get this whole environment to work under FreeBSD > (any version)? I guess for sqsh, I should be able to run it under the > Linux emulation (it doesn't need any other files other than the library). > What about the Linux perl? Or you could use the FreeTDS driver on FreeBSD to do the same thing natively under FreeBSD. The FreeTDS driver has some rough areas. The FreeTDS driver may become obsolete soon, as a Sybase rep announced on the FreeTDS list that he is working to have the Sybase client made OpenSource. > Lastly, any chance of cross compiling for the Linux environment using > FreeBSD - otherwise we'll have to keep the Linux box around just for > development. I belive there is a linux-dev port for this. > Thanks, > > Tim Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 17: 6:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from unix1.it-datacntr.louisville.edu (unix1.it-datacntr.louisville.edu [136.165.4.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672B214D84 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:06:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from k.stevenson@louisville.edu) Received: from homer.louisville.edu (ktstev01@homer.louisville.edu [136.165.1.20]) by unix1.it-datacntr.louisville.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA15604 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:05:54 -0500 Received: (from ktstev01@localhost) by homer.louisville.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA12268 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:05:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19990302200553.A10700@homer.louisville.edu> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:05:53 -0500 From: Keith Stevenson To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Carl Makin on Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 09:44:43AM +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 09:44:43AM +1100, Carl Makin wrote: > > I'm trying to run the ADSM backup clients for Linux under 3.1-STABLE and > not having much luck. > > When I start any of the client executables (after branding them as linux > executables) I get; > > Bad system call (core dumped) > > The machine is a P200MMX running FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE updated on Monday with > the packages-3-stable linux_lib_2.6 package. I got it running under 2.2.8 a few months ago, but every time I started it, the ADSM server running on our big OS/390 mainframe abended. This is widely considered to be a bad thing. (The mainframe's administrator certainly thought so.) I saw a posting to one of the FreeBSD lists about a week ago which identified the cause of the server's death as a buffer overflow problem. Last time I checked, IBM listed the Linux client as unsupported, so I don't imaging they are very interested in hearing that we are having problems running it in emulation mode. (I am leaning on our regional support rep to suggest a FreeBSD port. I don't think I'm going to get very far though.) Regards, --Keith Stevenson-- -- Keith Stevenson System Programmer - Data Center Services - University of Louisville k.stevenson@louisville.edu PGP key fingerprint = 4B 29 A8 95 A8 82 EA A2 29 CE 68 DE FC EE B6 A0 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 17:13:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip248.houston2.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.201.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E8514D84 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:13:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA35014; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:13:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:13:51 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: Dan Herrera Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATAPI CD-ROM no longer works Message-ID: <19990302191351.F31528@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: ; from Dan Herrera on Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 01:51:54PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 2, 1999, Dan Herrera put this into my mailbox: > I've just cvsupped up to the latest version of 3.1-STABLE. > > After modifying the GENERIC kernel to match my hardware and > rebooting, it no longer sees my wcd0 cdrom. At 3.0-RELEASE > this worked just fine. > > I read through /usr/src/README and /usr/src/UPDATING, and > included acd0 in my kernel config, but I don't see either > device while going back through dmesg. Try: options ATAPI #Enable ATAPI support for IDE bus options ATAPI_STATIC #Don't do it as an LKM device acd0 #IDE CD-ROM device wfd0 #IDE Floppy (e.g. LS-120) (This is part of a 4.0-CURRENT config, the ATAPI_STATIC may or may not apply to you) Did you run MAKEDEV to create the acd0 device? > > Is this something I need to configure with pnp? > I'm none too sure on how to configure devices using pnp, > could someone point out some good documentation on configuring > pnp devices? > > Thanks > > Dan Herrera > Expresscopy.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 17:22:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F07B14E07 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:22:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) Received: (from smap@localhost) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA06191; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:21:50 +1100 (EST) Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma006179; Wed, 3 Mar 99 12:21:26 +1100 Received: from localhost (carl@localhost) by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA02319; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:21:26 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:21:26 +1100 (EST) From: Carl Makin X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au To: Keith Stevenson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. In-Reply-To: <19990302200553.A10700@homer.louisville.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Keith Stevenson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 09:44:43AM +1100, Carl Makin wrote: > > I'm trying to run the ADSM backup clients for Linux under 3.1-STABLE and > > not having much luck. > I got it running under 2.2.8 a few months ago, but every time I started it, > the ADSM server running on our big OS/390 mainframe abended. This is widely The server wasn't checking data sent to it by the client. The linux client was sending something bad back the killing the server. There is a fixtext out for the AIX server at level 3.1.2.15 which solves that problem. Now that I get past that problem I'm getting the "bad system call" problem. I'm going to try the linux client on a 2.2.8-STABLE box and see what explodes. Carl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 17:26: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AE214DF4 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:26:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-216-180-15-176.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.15.176]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA21370; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:25:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA10091; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:25:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199903030125.TAA10091@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Tom Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-reply-to: Message from Tom of "Mon, 01 Mar 1999 19:59:32 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 19:25:19 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tom writes: > > The drive at home has 1M of internal RAM, the DDS-3 drives at work have > > 2M buffers. It would appear FreeBSD doesn't make use of these buffers. > > I don't see how that could be. SCSI tapes are SCSI tapes. Any > buffering done by the device should be invisible. There might be a SCSI > mode page flag to turn it on or off though. What if you write 1MB ahead into the tape drive, then hit the end of tape? How would one attempt to recover from that? It seems the Un*x architects intend to be able to recover from that situation altho in practice its unreliable. It seems only one block at a time is given to the drive, and the drive doesn't ask for more until the first is safely on tape. I have a Seagate/Conner/Archive DAT book that is begging me to read some more. > > A couple of percent. Using dd to read /dev/zero and write /dev/null > > yields 208M/sec w/o rc5des running, 203M/sec with, writing 100000 > > blocks of 10k (roughly 1G) so the test runs long enough to be valid. > > Those figures are pretty weird. 208MB/s or ? That is a pretty fast > tape drive. /dev/zero isn't a good test source due to drive compression > and encoding stuff. Read the above again. I was writing to /dev/null. The experiment suggests /dev/rsa0 is blocking on writing of only one block, while /dev/null doesn't block. rc5des hurt writing to /dev/null by 2.5% but hurts writing to /dev/rsa0 by 50%. The suggestion to hack HZ in the kernel isn't a bad idea at all. Other than the little problem the machine at work that I really want to apply this to is no longer under my control. Its owner moved it to another facility where I have to visit it as a common user. :-( -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 17:51: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip248.houston2.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.201.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D754D14D00 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:50:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA35149; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:50:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:50:10 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: Carl Makin Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. Message-ID: <19990302195009.G31528@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: ; from Carl Makin on Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 10:15:41AM +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 2, 1999, Carl Makin put this into my mailbox: > > On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Tom wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Carl Makin wrote: > > > > I'm trying to run the ADSM backup clients for Linux under 3.1-STABLE and > > > not having much luck. > > > Getting a backup client to work under emulation will be particularly > > difficult, especially with the default /compat/linux pathing. It probably > > won't even be able to see files outside the compat tree. > > Is that right? So how come I can run StarOffice 5 and WP for Linux and > access my home directory? AFAIK, the Linux emulation libraries check in /usr/contrib/linux first, and then in / -Chris -- Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 18: 1: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip248.houston2.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.201.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7585F14BEE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:00:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA35223; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:00:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:00:36 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: "Dan - Sr. Admin" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wierd soundcard issue. Message-ID: <19990302200036.H31528@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: <19990301180057.A1489@globalserve.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: <19990301180057.A1489@globalserve.net>; from Dan - Sr. Admin on Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 06:00:57PM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 1, 1999, Dan - Sr. Admin put this into my mailbox: > > Greetings, > > I happened to notice now that whenever I try to run an application that > accesses the soundcard, I get the kernel messages of a possible IRQ/DRQ > conflict. > > This is interesting, because my hardware configuration has not changed. > Plug n pray is naturally turned off in the bios, and I have allocated the > IRQ and DMAs that the soundcard uses to ISA devices. > > It's a case of working one day and not the next. > > Ideas? Which sound card are you using? I configured my SB64 card in about 5 minutes with PnP (using the pcm driver). It runs great. -Chris -- Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 18:13: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CB7B1505E for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:13:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 10I19S-0004Gc-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:12:46 -0800 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:12:43 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: David Kelly Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-Reply-To: <199903030125.TAA10091@nospam.hiwaay.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, David Kelly wrote: > Tom writes: > > > The drive at home has 1M of internal RAM, the DDS-3 drives at work have > > > 2M buffers. It would appear FreeBSD doesn't make use of these buffers. > > > > I don't see how that could be. SCSI tapes are SCSI tapes. Any > > buffering done by the device should be invisible. There might be a SCSI > > mode page flag to turn it on or off though. > > What if you write 1MB ahead into the tape drive, then hit the end of > tape? How would one attempt to recover from that? It seems the Un*x > architects intend to be able to recover from that situation altho in > practice its unreliable. It seems only one block at a time is given to > the drive, and the drive doesn't ask for more until the first is safely > on tape. Well, that is assuming the buffer is used for writing. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 18:14:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EED1553F for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:14:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA00263 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:13:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <199903030213.TAA00263@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: wide (but not fast) SCSI To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:13:45 -0700 (MST) Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I launched a query about this a couple of months ago, but it ran down without a resolution. I've got an almost completely stock AST "Manhattan D" fileserver. It came with WinNT, which I blew up as soon as I got it to write out the diagnostic and configuration diskettes. I've added a 2GB Conner Fast/Wide SCSI drive to go along with the IBM Fast/Wide SCSI drive delivered with the machine. I also added an HP DAT drive. It's running 2.2.8-STABLE, updated via cvsup approximately once a month. The motherboard has an Intel 200MHz Pentium Pro with 256KB of L2 cache, 32MB of RAM and an on-board Adaptec 7880 based Fast/Wide SCSI controller. There's also an on-board EIDE controller, which is running the CD-ROM drive (though I think that has no bearing here). The problem is that the disk drives set up for wide (16 bit) transfers, but not for fast (20 MHz). The disks run at 10 MHz, and the tape at 5. Attached is an edited output of a dmesg, created during a verbose boot. I left in all disk related messages. I suspect the problem may have something to do with these lines: ahc0: Reading SEEPROM...checksum error ahc0: No SEEPROM available ahc0: Using left over BIOS settings Any idea what I should do to get the transfer speed up to speed? -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org chad@anasazi.com larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE #0: Tue Mar 2 18:33:34 MST 1999 chad@freeway.dcfinc.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/freeway Calibrating clock(s) ... i586 clock: 198654421 Hz, i8254 clock: 1193121 Hz CPU: Pentium Pro (198.65-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x619 Stepping=9 Features=0xf9ff real memory = 33554432 (32768K bytes) avail memory = 31027200 (30300K bytes) pcibus_setup(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x80000058 pcibus_setup(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pcibus_check: device 0 is there (id=12378086) Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: configuration mode 1 allows 32 devices. chip0 rev 2 on pci0:0:0 ahc0 rev 0 int a irq 11 on pci0:13:0 mapreg[10] type=1 addr=0000fc00 size=0100. mapreg[14] type=0 addr=fe9ff000 size=1000. reg16: ioaddr=0xfc00 size=0x100 ahc0: Reading SEEPROM...checksum error ahc0: No SEEPROM available ahc0: Using left over BIOS settings ahc0: aic7880 Wide Channel, SCSI Id=7, 16 SCBs ahc0: Resetting Channel A ahc0: Downloading Sequencer Program...ahc0: 367 instructions downloaded Done ahc0: Probing channel A Choosing drivers for scbus configured at 0 ahc0 waiting for scsi devices to settle ahc0: target 0 using 16Bit transfers ahc0: target 0 synchronous at 10.0MHz, offset = 0x8 ahc0: target 0 Tagged Queuing Device (ahc0:0:0): "IBM DORS-32160W WA6A" type 0 fixed SCSI 2 sd is configured at 0 sd0(ahc0:0:0): Direct-Access 2063MB (4226725 512 byte sectors) sd0(ahc0:0:0): with 6703 cyls, 5 heads, and an average 126 sectors/track ahc0: target 1 using 16Bit transfers ahc0: target 1 synchronous at 10.0MHz, offset = 0x8 ahc0: target 1 Tagged Queuing Device (ahc0:1:0): "CONNER CFP2107E 2.14GB 1524" type 0 fixed SCSI 2 sd1(ahc0:1:0): Direct-Access 2048MB (4194304 512 byte sectors) sd1(ahc0:1:0): with 3999 cyls, 10 heads, and an average 104 sectors/track ahc0: target 5 synchronous at 5.0MHz, offset = 0x8 (ahc0:5:0): "HP HP35480A T603" type 1 removable SCSI 2 st is configured at 0 st0(ahc0:5:0): Sequential-Access density code 0x13, drive empty fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa wdc0: unit 0 (atapi): , removable, accel, dma, iordis wcd0: 1378KB/sec, 256KB cache, audio play, 256 volume levels, ejectable tray wcd0: medium type unknown, unlocked BIOS Geometries: 0:03fe3f20 0..1022=1023 cylinders, 0..63=64 heads, 1..32=32 sectors 0 accounted for Device configuration finished. Considering FFS root f/s. sd0s1: type 0x4, start 32, end = 32767, size 32736 : OK sd0s2: type 0xa5, start 32768, end = 4225023, size 4192256 : OK sd1s1: type 0xa5, start 0, end = 4194303, size 4194304 : OK sd1s1: type 0xa5, start 0, end = 4194303, size 4194304 : OK sd1s1: type 0xa5, start 0, end = 4194303, size 4194304 : OK -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 18:39:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2088714E23 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:38:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-216-180-15-176.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.15.176]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA23291; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:38:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA10662; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:38:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199903030238.UAA10662@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Tom Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: rc5des slows tape thruput In-reply-to: Message from Tom of "Tue, 02 Mar 1999 18:12:43 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 20:38:38 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tom writes: > On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, David Kelly wrote: > > What if you write 1MB ahead into the tape drive, then hit the end of > > tape? How would one attempt to recover from that? It seems the Un*x > > architects intend to be able to recover from that situation altho in > > practice its unreliable. It seems only one block at a time is given to > > the drive, and the drive doesn't ask for more until the first is safely > > on tape. > > Well, that is assuming the buffer is used for writing. I suspect tape drive RAM is mostly used for buffering during compression. Haven't been trying compression and even went to extended effort to disable compression on all my DDS drives. But am guessing comprssion might invoke buffering. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 20:47: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD7714E8D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:46:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfieber@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA00694; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 21:33:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 21:33:03 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: chris@calldei.com Cc: Tim Tsai , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using Linux libraries In-Reply-To: <19990302182024.E31528@holly.dyndns.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Chris Costello wrote: > Firstly, I'm not sure if Sybase supports FreeBSD. Is their > software open source? The license explicitly forbids running the Linux port under emulation on a non-linux system. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 21:17:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2FD14EA8 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 21:15:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-216-180-14-201.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.14.201]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA28084; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:15:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA10775; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:51:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199903030251.UAA10775@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: chad@DCFinc.com Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: wide (but not fast) SCSI In-reply-to: Message from "Chad R. Larson" of "Tue, 02 Mar 1999 19:13:45 MST." <199903030213.TAA00263@freeway.dcfinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 20:51:34 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Chad R. Larson" writes: > I've got an almost completely stock AST "Manhattan D" fileserver. > It came with WinNT, which I blew up as soon as I got it to write out > the diagnostic and configuration diskettes. I've added a 2GB Conner > Fast/Wide SCSI drive to go along with the IBM Fast/Wide SCSI drive > delivered with the machine. I also added an HP DAT drive. If you have installed Fast/Wide SCSI devices then to get the faster bus rate of 20 MHz you have to buy new Ultra/Wide SCSI devices. Your dmesg output tends to support this. > ahc0: target 0 synchronous at 10.0MHz, offset = 0x8 [...] > ahc0: target 1 synchronous at 10.0MHz, offset = 0x8 [...] > ahc0: target 5 synchronous at 5.0MHz, offset = 0x8 -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 22:20:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from regret.globalserve.net (regret.globalserve.net [209.90.144.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2744414E99; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 22:20:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dm@regret.globalserve.net) Received: (from dm@localhost) by regret.globalserve.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) id CAA79950; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 02:32:22 GMT (envelope-from dm) Message-ID: <19990303023222.A79938@globalserve.net> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 02:32:22 +0000 From: "Dan - Sr. Admin" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: cvsup.ca.freebsd.org available again. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings, Just a quick note to let everyone know that cvsup.ca.freebsd.org is available again. Regards, -- Dan Moschuk (TFreak!dm@globalserve.net) Senior Systems/Network Administrator Globalserve Communications Inc., a Primus Canada Company "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 23:20: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE0A14EE7 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:19:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA39975; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:18:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: John Fieber Cc: chris@calldei.com, Tim Tsai , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using Linux libraries In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Mar 1999 21:33:03 EST." Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 23:18:59 -0800 Message-ID: <39971.920445539@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just a quick note from Linux World: I met the folks in question from Sybase and they indicated to me that they were working now (perhaps with the lawyers?) to remove that restriction on their license specifically for this reason. They're also contemplating a native port, but don't tell anyone! :-) - Jordan > On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Chris Costello wrote: > > > Firstly, I'm not sure if Sybase supports FreeBSD. Is their > > software open source? > > The license explicitly forbids running the Linux port under > emulation on a non-linux system. > > -john > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 2 23:21:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7313B14ED9 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:21:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 10I5y3-0007Z9-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:21:19 -0800 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 23:21:15 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: John Fieber Cc: chris@calldei.com, Tim Tsai , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using Linux libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, John Fieber wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Chris Costello wrote: > > > Firstly, I'm not sure if Sybase supports FreeBSD. Is their > > software open source? > > The license explicitly forbids running the Linux port under > emulation on a non-linux system. It doesn't seem to mention anything about emulation. It says you can't use the software on a non-Linux platform. I don't think they care about emulation, but I do think they care non-Linux clients being used. I don't really understand Sybase client software licensing, but it seems that you must buy clients for other platforms (unlike Oracle where clients for Windows and JDBC are free downloads). > -john Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 2:40:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264C81556D for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 02:40:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@scc.nl) Received: from scones.sup.scc.nl (i213.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.67.14]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA01868 from for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:40:09 +0100 (MET) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by scones.sup.scc.nl (8.9.2/8.9.1) id LAA19415 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:19:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by scones.sup.scc.nl with netnews for stable@FreeBSD.ORG (stable@FreeBSD.ORG) To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 11:19:23 +0100 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <36DD0CAB.EA5A1E9D@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <19990302200553.A10700@homer.louisville.edu>, Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Carl Makin wrote: > > > I got it running under 2.2.8 a few months ago, but every time I started it, > > the ADSM server running on our big OS/390 mainframe abended. This is widely > > Now that I get past that problem I'm getting the "bad system call" > problem. Do you know which system call it is? It could be worth implementing it (if it is unimplemented). marcel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 2:57: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.portal2.com (ns1.portal2.com [203.85.226.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23C7A14F99 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 02:56:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yusufg@huge.net) Received: (qmail 19494 invoked from network); 3 Mar 1999 11:09:07 -0000 Received: from yusufg.portal2.com (203.85.226.249) by ns1.portal2.com with SMTP; 3 Mar 1999 11:09:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 32329 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 1999 10:55:26 -0000 Date: 3 Mar 1999 10:55:26 -0000 Message-ID: <19990303105526.32328.qmail@yusufg.portal2.com> From: Yusuf Goolamabbas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Should sd0 be changed to da0 in kernel config for 3.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I just installed 3.1-RELEASE via ftp and want to recompile the kernel. I observe that the partions are now named as da0s1{a,c,e,..} so I am wondering whether I should change the mandatory keyword in the kernel config from config kernel_name on sd0 (I have a SCSI disk) to config kernel_name on da0 Would this work, Regards Yusuf -- Yusuf Goolamabbas yusufg@huge.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 4:44:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grom.mw.mil.pl (grom.mw.mil.pl [153.19.99.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956CB15096; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 04:38:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pawel@mw.mil.pl) Received: from mw.mil.pl (mili.mw.mil.pl [153.19.99.10]) by grom.mw.mil.pl (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA20498; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:42:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pawel@mw.mil.pl) Message-ID: <36DD3BBC.F99F7B31@mw.mil.pl> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 13:40:12 +0000 From: Pawel Jaskorzynski X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should sd0 be changed to da0 in kernel config for 3.1 References: <19990303105526.32328.qmail@yusufg.portal2.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote: > from > > config kernel_name on sd0 (I have a SCSI disk) > > to > > config kernel_name on da0 > > Would this work, Regards Yusuf Yes, this would be correct. Just to avoid potential troubles, try adjusting the GENERIC kernel (the one from 3.1) rather than using your old one. Best regards, Pawel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 6:18:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CFE1548C for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 06:17:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09908; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:16:51 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199903031416.LAA09908@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: Using Linux libraries In-Reply-To: <39971.920445539@zippy.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Mar 2, 1999 11:18:59 pm" To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:16:51 -0300 (EST) Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG #define quoting(Jordan K. Hubbard) // Just a quick note from Linux World: I met the folks in question from // Sybase and they indicated to me that they were working now (perhaps // with the lawyers?) to remove that restriction on their license // specifically for this reason. They're also contemplating a native // port, but don't tell anyone! :-) Hurray !!! Now who will talk to folks at Oracle ? :) Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro "This .sig is not meant to be politically correct." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 8: 3:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (terra.stack.nl [131.155.140.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7406914ED4 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 08:03:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (toad.stack.nl [131.155.140.135]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B05F2FF1 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:02:55 +0100 (MET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 302699672; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:02:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:02:56 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: tzset in libc Message-ID: <19990303170256.A15288@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD toad.stack.nl 2.2.8-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I was wondering why it was that each time you call localtime() or strftime(), tzset() is called also. Isn't it so that it only has to be called once per process and then be regearded as already set ? Why I am asking this is because when I profiled a program of mine that called localtime() about 2 million times it also called getenv() 2 million times also. And since getenv() is a relatively slow operation, it yielded more than 50% performance when I patched libc not to call tzset() each time. When the timezone changes, you'd have to call tzset() manually, but in my case, it's worth it. Just curious.... Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 11:55: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dpi.dgtu.donetsk.ua (dgtu-dipt-38.4K.dgtu.donetsk.ua [194.44.183.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C297114F3A for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:54:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yk@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua) Received: from info.dgtu.donetsk.ua (root@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua [194.44.183.7]) by dpi.dgtu.donetsk.ua (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA13741 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:53:25 +0200 (EET) Received: (from yk@localhost) by info.dgtu.donetsk.ua (8.8.7/8.8.5) id VAA08420 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:53:26 +0200 (EET) From: Yury Yaroshevsky Message-Id: <199903031953.VAA08420@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua> Subject: crashe 3.1-RELEASE ... To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:53:26 +0200 (EET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This script freeze my 3.1-RELEASE box. I can't make any connection with my box, also from console. -------- cut here --- #! /bin/sh for j in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 do echo -n $j nohup sh -c 'while :; do find / -type file |xargs fgrep fticom; done' >/dev/null 2>&1 & echo done --------- cut here ---- -- Yury V. Yaroshevsky | Donetsk State Technical University YY18-RIPE | (380 622) 356455 yk@dgtu.donetsk.ua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 12:19:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip90.houston2.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.201.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585FE15013 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:18:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA26715; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:18:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:18:51 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: Marc Olzheim Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tzset in libc Message-ID: <19990303141850.B13061@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: <19990303170256.A15288@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: <19990303170256.A15288@stack.nl>; from Marc Olzheim on Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 05:02:56PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 3, 1999, Marc Olzheim put this into my mailbox: > > Hi, > > I was wondering why it was that each time you call localtime() or strftime(), > tzset() is called also. Isn't it so that it only has to be called once > per process and then be regearded as already set ? No. If you reset your time zone while a program is running, what then? -Chris -- Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" int main(int m){main(!main(0));} To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 12:43:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (border.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDF614ED0 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:43:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <40360>; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:31:38 +1100 Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:43:00 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: tzset in libc To: marcolz@stack.nl Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <99Mar4.073138est.40360@border.alcanet.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marc Olzheim wrote: >I was wondering why it was that each time you call localtime() or strftime(), >tzset() is called also. The Open Group's Single Unix Specification states: In localtime(): "Local timezone information is used as though localtime() calls tzset()". In strftime(): "Local timezone information is used as though strftime() called tzset()". > Isn't it so that it only has to be called once >per process and then be regearded as already set ? The process could change TZ. (I'm currently writing some code that continually updates TZ so it can determine the time in various timezones). >When the timezone changes, you'd have to call tzset() manually, but in my >case, it's worth it. The problem would be finding all existent code that relies on the current behaviour. Unfortunately, I can't think of a simple solution that would maintain compatibility with the standard and current behaviour. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 12:58:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (terra.stack.nl [131.155.140.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A55156A7 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:58:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (toad.stack.nl [131.155.140.135]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6D32FF1; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:58:25 +0100 (MET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 377599672; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:58:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 21:58:27 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: chris@calldei.com Cc: Marc Olzheim , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tzset in libc Message-ID: <19990303215827.A2249@stack.nl> References: <19990303170256.A15288@stack.nl> <19990303141850.B13061@holly.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <19990303141850.B13061@holly.dyndns.org>; from Chris Costello on Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 02:18:51PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD toad.stack.nl 2.2.8-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Wed, Mar 3, 1999, Marc Olzheim put this into my mailbox: > > > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering why it was that each time you call localtime() or strftime(), > > tzset() is called also. Isn't it so that it only has to be called once > > per process and then be regearded as already set ? > > No. If you reset your time zone while a program is > running, what then? Then you call tzset() :-) We used to run a libc like that here and I kind of got used to it. Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 13:45:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from luke.pmr.com (luke.pmr.com [207.170.114.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DAC14FBB for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:43:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bob@luke.pmr.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by luke.pmr.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id PAA10274 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 15:43:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 15:43:28 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: stable list Subject: Looping Prob w/Dual Xeon system Message-ID: <19990303154328.A10107@luke.pmr.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just installed a second Xeon processor in my system running FreeBSD 3.1-stable. When I boot an MP kernel it goes into some kind of apparent loop. Xperfmon++-3.1 reports > 200,000 chars/sec on tty out and 0% idle time. Top also reports 0.0% idle but no processes are running. When I first boot the system things seem okay. Running any kind of load (like building a kernel) though, will cause this looping behavior. A UP kernel does not have this problem. The motherboard is an ASUS GX-DLS. Any ideas on what might be wrong or what I can do to further track this down would be greatly welcomed. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox The man who follows the crowd will usually get no bob@luke.pmr.com further than the crowd. The man who walks alone is Austin, TX likely to find himself in places no one has ever been. -- Alan Ashley-Pitt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 14: 1:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bones.ecst.csuchico.edu (bones.ecst.csuchico.edu [132.241.5.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1C3814FA9 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:59:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from amarks@ecst.csuchico.edu) Received: (qmail 19468 invoked by uid 20393); 3 Mar 1999 13:59:37 -0800 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:59:37 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam D. Marks" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: game Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I was wondering if anyone was able to get the linux quake2 to work under freebsd. In 2.2.8 I was able to get my Voodoo to work but the game core dumped now with 3.1 the game does not core dump but it reports that it can not locate my glide device ie Voodoo card. If anyone has goten it to work please let me know what all you had to do. Thank-you, Adam Marks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 14:22: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from calumet.infoteam.com (calumet.infoteam.com [207.2.129.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B21814FF7 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:20:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kmartin@ksm.com) Received: (from kmartin@localhost) by calumet.infoteam.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA08973 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:20:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kmartin) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:20:27 -0500 From: Kenn Martin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Celeron systems Message-ID: <19990303172027.A8829@calumet.infoteam.com> References: <19990303154328.A10107@luke.pmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <19990303154328.A10107@luke.pmr.com>; from Bob Willcox on Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 03:43:28PM -0600 Organization: InfoTeam Corp, Lexington Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We have a couple of new boxes coming in with Celeron processors. We run 3.1-STABLE on most systems and will do the same with these. What cpu option should be chosen for the kernel config? I would guess that it is I586_CPU, but LINT is now a little vague with all of the different incarnations of the Pentium. Nothing to be found in the Handbook or FAQ either. thanks, kenn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 14:34:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110AC15610 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:34:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id HAA01931; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:34:38 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <36DDB1F9.D944C26E@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 07:04:41 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Olzheim Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tzset in libc References: <19990303170256.A15288@stack.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marc Olzheim wrote: > > I was wondering why it was that each time you call localtime() or strftime(), > tzset() is called also. Isn't it so that it only has to be called once > per process and then be regearded as already set ? [...] > When the timezone changes, you'd have to call tzset() manually, but in my > case, it's worth it. Could it be that time zone can change because of daylight savings? Notice, this is just an uninformed guess. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "FreeBSD is Yoda, Linux is Luke Skywalker." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 14:45:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freesbee.t.dk (freesbee.t.dk [193.162.159.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA83C15662 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:44:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesper@freesbee.t.dk) Received: (qmail 19166 invoked by uid 1001); 3 Mar 1999 22:44:25 -0000 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 23:44:25 +0100 From: Jesper Skriver To: Kenn Martin Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Celeron systems Message-ID: <19990303234425.B18464@skriver.dk> References: <19990303154328.A10107@luke.pmr.com> <19990303172027.A8829@calumet.infoteam.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <19990303172027.A8829@calumet.infoteam.com>; from Kenn Martin on Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 05:20:27PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I believe it's the I686_CPU, the celeron is essencially a Pentium II processor. /Jesper On Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 05:20:27PM -0500, Kenn Martin wrote: > We have a couple of new boxes coming in with Celeron processors. We > run 3.1-STABLE on most systems and will do the same with these. What > cpu option should be chosen for the kernel config? I would guess > that it is I586_CPU, but LINT is now a little vague with all of the > different incarnations of the Pentium. Nothing to be found in the > Handbook or FAQ either. > > thanks, > kenn > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 14:53:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420A014FD6; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:53:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.1/8.8.8) id OAA29125; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:53:14 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda29123; Wed Mar 3 14:53:00 1999 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.2/8.9.1) id OAA74925; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:52:54 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903032252.OAA74925@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Received: from localhost.gov.bc.ca(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "passer.osg.gov.bc.ca" via SMTP by localhost.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdv74921; Wed Mar 3 14:52:49 1999 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE X-Sender: cschuber To: Yusuf Goolamabbas Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should sd0 be changed to da0 in kernel config for 3.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "03 Mar 1999 10:55:26 GMT." <19990303105526.32328.qmail@yusufg.portal2.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 14:52:48 -0800 From: Cy Schubert Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is what I use: config kernel root on da0s1a swap on da0s1b I've been using this since 2.2.6+CAM patches and now use it on 3.1. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca Province of BC In message <19990303105526.32328.qmail@yusufg.portal2.com>, Yusuf Goolamabbas w rites: > Hi, I just installed 3.1-RELEASE via ftp and want to recompile the > kernel. I observe that the partions are now named as da0s1{a,c,e,..} > so I am wondering whether I should change the mandatory keyword in the > kernel config from > > config kernel_name on sd0 (I have a SCSI disk) > > to > > config kernel_name on da0 > > Would this work, Regards Yusuf > > -- > Yusuf Goolamabbas > yusufg@huge.net > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 15:24:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2636A1578F for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 15:23:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) Received: (from smap@localhost) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA23462 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:23:11 +1100 (EST) Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma023449; Thu, 4 Mar 99 10:22:47 +1100 Received: from localhost (carl@localhost) by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA10512 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:02:16 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:02:16 +1100 (EST) From: Carl Makin X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Carl Makin wrote: > > Now that I get past that problem I'm getting the "bad system call" > > problem. > Do you know which system call it is? It could be worth implementing it (if it > is unimplemented). No I don't. Do you know how to tell? Carl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 19: 5:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C579D15069 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 19:04:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA01928; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 20:04:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <199903040304.UAA01928@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. (fwd) In-Reply-To: from Carl Makin at "Mar 4, 99 10:02:16 am" To: carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au (Carl Makin) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 20:04:12 -0700 (MST) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Carl Makin wrote: >On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >>Carl Makin wrote: >>>Now that I get past that problem I'm getting the "bad system call" >>>problem. >>Do you know which system call it is? It could be worth implementing it (if it >>is unimplemented). >No I don't. Do you know how to tell? >Carl. man ktrace -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org chad@anasazi.com larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 19:41:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D2915084 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 19:40:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) Received: (from smap@localhost) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA01423; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:39:48 +1100 (EST) Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma001415; Thu, 4 Mar 99 14:39:41 +1100 Received: from localhost (carl@localhost) by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA01694; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:39:41 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:39:41 +1100 (EST) From: Carl Makin X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. In-Reply-To: <36DDCAD6.515D68A7@scc.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Carl Makin wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > Carl Makin wrote: > > > > Now that I get past that problem I'm getting the "bad system call" > Run the client with kernel tracing enabled (ktrace). The tracefile can then Here is the end of the dump; 1641 dsm CALL linux_open(0x828ff0b,0,0x1b6) 1641 dsm NAMI "/compat/linux/etc/mtab" 1641 dsm NAMI "/etc/mtab" 1641 dsm RET linux_open 6 1641 dsm CALL linux_newfstat(0x6,0xefbfcea8) 1641 dsm RET linux_newfstat 0 1641 dsm CALL linux_mmap(0xefbfce64) 1641 dsm RET linux_mmap 673939456/0x282b8000 1641 dsm CALL read(0x6,0x282b8000,0x2000) 1641 dsm GIO fd 6 read 205 bytes "/dev/wd0s1b none ext2 rw 0 0 /dev/da1s1b none ext2 rw 0 0 /dev/wd0s1a / ext2 rw 0 0 /dev/wd0s1f /usr ext2 rw 0 0 /dev/wd0s1e /var ext2 rw 0 0 /dev/da2s1e /mirror ext2 rw 0 0 /dev/ccd0c /stripe ext2 rw 0 0 " 1641 dsm RET read 205/0xcd 1641 dsm CALL read(0x6,0x282b8000,0x2000) 1641 dsm GIO fd 6 read 0 bytes "" 1641 dsm RET read 0 1641 dsm CALL close(0x6) 1641 dsm RET close 0 1641 dsm CALL munmap(0x282b8000,0x2000) 1641 dsm RET munmap 0 1641 dsm CALL linux_newstat(0xefbfcdf4,0xefbfcda0) 1641 dsm NAMI "/compat/linux/usr/adsm/dsmstat" 1641 dsm NAMI "/usr/adsm/dsmstat" 1641 dsm RET linux_newstat 0 1641 dsm CALL linux_ipc(0x17,0,0x460,0x780,0) 1641 dsm RET linux_ipc 65537/0x10001 1641 dsm CALL linux_ipc(0x15,0x10001,0,0xefbfcdcc,0) 1641 dsm RET linux_ipc 0 1641 dsm CALL linux_ipc(0x2,0,0x2,0x380,0) 1641 dsm PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL 1641 dsm NAMI "dsm.core" I've run it a few times and it fails at that same linux_ipc call each time. Carl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 23: 9:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from picalon.gun.de (picalon.gun.de [194.77.0.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F74114CEA; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 23:09:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (pppak04.gtn.com [194.231.123.169]) by picalon.gun.de (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA00596; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:09:21 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id IAA01783; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:09:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:09:01 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: dillon@FreeBSD.ORG, eivind@FreeBSD.ORG, archie@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@FreeBSD.ORG, semenu@FreeBSD.ORG, jkoshy@FreeBSD.ORG, dfr@FreeBSD.ORG, gibbs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: to every person, who committed things to the tx driver, which shows strange behaviour Message-ID: <19990304080901.A777@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Reply-To: andreas.klemm.ak@bayer-ag.de, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I'm writing this to every person, who committed stuff to the tx driver, possibly somebody has an idea, what's still wrong with the driver, especially in 2.2.8-STABLE or what race condition might occur. Stefan Esser made this suggestion, after a large debugging session via phone. The symptoms are, slow incoming performance (not more than 860 KByte/sec), dog slow (80 KByte/sec) outgoing performance, when doing a put (ftp) or when clients read data via ftp/http). Any combination of 10 / 100 MBit full or half duplex doesn't change the strange behaviour, that the card has absolutely no good performance, sending packets out. The machine sits behind a Catalyst 5500 switch. The Catalyst switch has a peak load of about 10%, not more in the last weeks, so it's not the switch. The FreeBSD machine isn't loaded as well. To make sure, that it's not the cabling or the switch, I connected my laptop to the FreeBSD machine directly with a crossover cable. When doing a ftp session I don't get more than 27 KByte/sec. The connection seemed to hang. System: HP Kayak XA, 450 MHz Pentium II, 128 MB RAM AHA 2940, SMC PCI Network Card, ELSA PCI Grafic Card I made sure with dmesg | grep irq, that the SMC card has an irq of it's own. It's IRQ 10 now. At the very beginning of the debugging session we experienced the following extra problems, enabling #define EPIC_DEBUG 1 cured these problems: 1) When reading data from the apache webserver, the first two seeconds I see, that the card is processing up to 1000 interrupts per second (saw this via systat -vmstat 1) When doing a netstat -I tx0 1 you see, that 2 seconds long the card is sending many packets per second (around 20 or 40 KByte) but after the 2 seconds the card sends and receives only about 1-2 packages per seconds 2) During boot the driver sends a message, that he can't read PHY! 3) Doing a while true do ifconfig -a | grep status: done shows, that the card changes status When compiling a kernel without EPIC_DEBUG, PHY! isn't recognized and the card doesn't get status connected, instead of this it flaps between to different messages (sorry forgot about it) After defining EPIC_DEBUG the tx0 driver recognizes PHY! and status: changes to "connected". Without EPIC_DEBUG telnet sessions with lot's of output (ls -l in a long directory) tend to slow down dramatically after 2 seconds, then hang up to session losses. Within this insane state I only got 27 KByte/sec. throughput from a client getting the kernel via ftp. With EPIC_DEBUG the tcp output performance increased to 86 KByte/sec. Now the transfers doesn't hang, telnet sessions doesn't hang anymore. Everything is fine with the exception, that I only get 86 KByte/sec throughput out and only 860 KByte/sec. in on a 450 MHz PII machine being connected to a Cisco Catalyst switch in 100 MBit full duplex mode. I set this explicitely on the switch and on the FreeBSD machine, since auto recognition doesn't work well. BTW: netstat -i didn't show any collisions or such (shouldn't appear on a switch port in full-duplex mode). The catalyst switch has IOS 4.4(1) on it and is otherwise running fine. It's the switch for our floor in the building ... and as I said, the load isn'r really heavy and I still had the problem around 7pm, when not many people are in the building ... Well, what's that ???? Any idea ??? BTW, when using the tx driver from 2.2.7 in a 2.2.8-STABLE kernel (without this debugging define) the machine hangs during boot, but the tx0 driver recognized PHY! as I could see on the console. This is only the case with the FBSD 228 version of the tx driver AND enabling EPIC_DEBUG Could you figure out, what's going wrong so badly ??? Did ever somebody test the driver in high performance machines on 10 or 100 MBit networks ???? Am I the only person having this trouble ??? Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 3 23:47:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from huron.dnepr.net.ua (h.dnepr.net.ua [195.248.169.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C36A14CA3 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 23:46:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from art@monov.dp.ua) Received: from ontario.dnepr.net.ua (ontario.dnepr.net.ua [193.193.215.33]) by huron.dnepr.net.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA08574 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 09:46:22 +0200 (EET) Received: from erie.creator.dp.ua (erie.dnepr.net.ua [193.193.215.34]) by ontario.dnepr.net.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3z) with ESMTP id JAA03059 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 09:46:21 +0200 (EET) Received: from monov.dp.ua (fish.creator.dp.ua [172.16.33.126]) by erie.creator.dp.ua (8.9.3/8.9.1w) with ESMTP id JAA26613 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 09:46:20 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <36DE3B2D.2C08407B@monov.dp.ua> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:50:05 +0200 From: art X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (Win98; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: zzz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable subscribe cvs-all To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 0:59: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aire.open.ac.uk (aire.open.ac.uk [137.108.40.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320E714CA8 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 00:59:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from A.M.Zanker@open.ac.uk) Received: from mallard.open.ac.uk ([137.108.40.50] helo=mallard) by aire.open.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 10ITxr-00015Y-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:58:43 +0000 Message-Id: <4.1.19990304085725.00af4100@aire.open.ac.uk> X-Sender: mikez@aire.open.ac.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 08:58:43 +0000 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Zanker Subject: Re: Celeron systems In-Reply-To: <19990303172027.A8829@calumet.infoteam.com> References: <19990303154328.A10107@luke.pmr.com> <19990303154328.A10107@luke.pmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 22:20 03/03/99 , Kenn Martin wrote: >We have a couple of new boxes coming in with Celeron processors. We >run 3.1-STABLE on most systems and will do the same with these. What >cpu option should be chosen for the kernel config? I would guess >that it is I586_CPU, but LINT is now a little vague with all of the >different incarnations of the Pentium. Nothing to be found in the >Handbook or FAQ either. Definitely I686_CPU - a kernel with only I586_CPU defined will not boot. Mike -- Mike Zanker | Email: A.M.Zanker@open.ac.uk Network and Computer Services Group | Tel : +44 1908 652726 The Open University | Fax : +44 1908 652193 Milton Keynes, UK | PGP public key available To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 1:53:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (terra.stack.nl [131.155.140.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D3D14DBC for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 01:53:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (toad.stack.nl [131.155.140.135]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6662B3088; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:53:04 +0100 (MET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 08FC89672; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:53:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:53:04 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: Marc Olzheim , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tzset in libc Message-ID: <19990304105304.A28682@stack.nl> References: <19990303170256.A15288@stack.nl> <36DDB1F9.D944C26E@newsguy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <36DDB1F9.D944C26E@newsguy.com>; from Daniel C. Sobral on Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 07:04:41AM +0900 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD toad.stack.nl 2.2.8-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Could it be that time zone can change because of daylight savings? > Notice, this is just an uninformed guess. Nope. Normal processes will always keep the same TZ. You'd have to set it yourself to have it change. Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 2:49:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (terra.stack.nl [131.155.140.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572EB150D0 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 02:49:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (toad.stack.nl [131.155.140.135]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5012D3049 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:48:47 +0100 (MET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 1260B9672; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:48:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:48:47 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: DOS with ktrace Message-ID: <19990304114847.A1201@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD toad.stack.nl 2.2.8-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi. When ktracing the following prog, FreeBSD 2.2.8 sometimes produces a deadlock situation. #include #include #include #include #include #include extern int main (int argc, char **argv) { char buffer[1000000]; int result; if (fcntl(1, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK)) err(1, "fcntl(1, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK)"); bzero(buffer, sizeof(buffer)); strcpy(buffer, "hoihoihoihoihoi!"); for (;;) { result = write(1, buffer, sizeof(buffer)); if (result == -1) warn("write(1, buffer, %d)", sizeof(buffer)); else if (result == 0) errx(1, "result == 0"); else if (result != sizeof(buffer)) errx(1, "result == %d", result); } argc = 0; argv = NULL; return 0; } Just compile it and run it as: ktrace -t cnsw ./testwrite > /tmp/foo Then suspend it with ^Z Any process trying to do filesystem-io will wait in locks. On a busy machine it will soon run out of resources. This does not happen 100% of the time, but it's very well reproducable, just try one or two times. I have no FreeBSD 3 boxes here yet to test it on, so I don't know wether it's affected or not, but it does affect 2.2.6 (i.e. non-CAM). Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 4:18:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835AB14E9E for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 04:16:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Received: from scones.sup.scc.nl (i133.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.112.94]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA17014; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 13:16:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from scc.nl (scones.sup.scc.nl [192.168.2.4]) by scones.sup.scc.nl (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA25178; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 13:16:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Message-ID: <36DE799B.3794FE8B@scc.nl> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 13:16:27 +0100 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: SCC vof X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carl Makin Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Carl Makin wrote: > 1641 dsm CALL linux_ipc(0x17,0,0x460,0x780,0) > 1641 dsm RET linux_ipc 65537/0x10001 > 1641 dsm CALL linux_ipc(0x15,0x10001,0,0xefbfcdcc,0) > 1641 dsm RET linux_ipc 0 > 1641 dsm CALL linux_ipc(0x2,0,0x2,0x380,0) > 1641 dsm PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL > 1641 dsm NAMI "dsm.core" linux_ipc is implemented. The failing syscall [linux_ipc(0x2,...)] has to to with semaphores (semget). You do have ``options SYSVSEM'' in your kernel config file? The generic kernel only has options SYSVSHM and SYSVMSG. marcel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 4:41:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.fuentez.com (fw-extern.fuentez.com [12.13.148.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F1714A0B for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 04:41:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwojcik@fuentez.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by fw.fuentez.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA11348 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:58:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from chas.fuentez.com(206.30.179.1) by fw.fuentez.com via smap (4.1) id xma011303; Thu, 4 Mar 99 07:58:26 -0500 Received: from fuentez.com (smokin.fuentez.com [206.30.179.100]) by chas.fuentez.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA04398 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:32:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwojcik@fuentez.com) Message-ID: <36DE7E61.A7A128E6@fuentez.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 07:36:49 -0500 From: "Martin F. Wojcik" Reply-To: mwojcik@fuentez.com Organization: Fuentez Systems Concepts Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: subscribe freebsd-stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 7:37:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from southpass.baynetworks.com (ns2.BayNetworks.COM [134.177.3.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A37814F95 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:37:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Mike_Kephart@corpeast.BayNetworks.COM) Received: from mailhost.BayNetworks.COM ([132.245.135.115]) by southpass.baynetworks.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA07447 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.corpeast.BayNetworks.COM (ns4.corpeast.baynetworks.com [132.245.135.76]) by mailhost.BayNetworks.COM (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA20780 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:37:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from bl-mail2.corpeast.BayNetworks.com (bl-mail2-hme0.corpeast.baynetworks.com [132.245.135.83]) by mailhost.corpeast.BayNetworks.COM (SMI-8.6/BNET-97/05/05-S) with SMTP id KAA11405; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:42:42 -0500 for Received: from baynetworks.com ([132.245.112.176]) by bl-mail2.corpeast.BayNetworks.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-51848U14000L14000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:38:37 -0500 Message-ID: <36DEA89D.8935C537@baynetworks.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:37:01 -0600 From: Mike Kephart Organization: Nortel Networks X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: reboot hangs and pccard change questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I have two problems which have shown up after upgrading from 3.0-RELEASE to 3.1-STABLE (as of 2/3/99 at 18:00 CST). The hardware being used here is a Dell Latitude CPi laptop. 1. The "reboot" command now hangs - on this laptop this is especially irritating since the power button is ineffective. Halt still works fine. [ I swear I saw this same problem posted recently, but could not find it in the archives... ] 2. I'm using the Xircom if_xe 1.14 beta pccard driver from Scott Mitchell. Under 3.1-STABLE, the driver never gets initialized - the driver name doesn't show up in the "Initializing PC-CARD drivers:" message from pccard_configure(). I was guessing this may have something to do with the return value from the driver's probe() routine (if_xe always returns 0), but random attempts at changing this value induced panics. I'm hoping someone more familiar with the pccard code might have some suggestions. Thanks, \MikeK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 8:42:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hyperhost.net (ether.lightrealm.com [207.159.132.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E6B14FE4; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:42:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patseal@hyperhost.net) Received: from port3.annex8.radix.net (port3.annex8.radix.net [205.252.108.3]) by hyperhost.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA01478; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:42:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:42:10 -0500 (EST) From: Patrick Seal To: Mike Kephart Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: reboot hangs and pccard change questions In-Reply-To: <36DEA89D.8935C537@baynetworks.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Mike Kephart wrote: > Hi, > > I have two problems which have shown up after upgrading from > 3.0-RELEASE to > 3.1-STABLE (as of 2/3/99 at 18:00 CST). The hardware being used here is > a > Dell Latitude CPi laptop. > > 1. The "reboot" command now hangs - on this laptop this is > especially > irritating since the power button is ineffective. Halt still works > fine. > [ I swear I saw this same problem posted recently, but could not find > it in the archives... ] THAT WAS ME! Yes, I have the same problem on the same laptop. You might want to send this stuff to freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG along with freebsd-questions, that's for laptop stuff. I'm going to take out apm from the kernel, then pccard stuff, and keep reducing to see if I can find the problem. BTW, has anything changed in the reboot command that might cause a hang after rebooting... > > 2. I'm using the Xircom if_xe 1.14 beta pccard driver from Scott > Mitchell. Under > 3.1-STABLE, the driver never gets initialized - the driver name doesn't > show up in the "Initializing PC-CARD drivers:" message from > pccard_configure(). > I was guessing this may have something to do with the return value from > the driver's probe() routine (if_xe always returns 0), but random > attempts > at changing this value induced panics. > > I'm hoping someone more familiar with the pccard code might have some > suggestions. > > Thanks, > \MikeK > ------------------------------------ _____________________________________ Patrick Seal |"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make | really crappy operating systems." Hyperhost - http://www.hyperhost.net| -Linus Torvalds hosting and Design http://www.freebsd.org - http://www.linux.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 10:27: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cantor.boolean.net (cantor.boolean.net [209.133.111.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557A61502B for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:27:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org) Received: from gypsy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cantor.boolean.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA48590 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:29:20 GMT (envelope-from Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990304101745.00974570@localhost> X-Sender: kurt@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 10:17:45 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" Subject: bonnie and MFS don't like each other Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Running bonnie on a MFS filesystem will lock up my 3.1-Stable system everytime if the size is larger than the amount of RAM available. (bonnie works fine otherwise). # cd /tmp (MFS filesystem) # bonnie -s 192 (system has 128MB ram, MFS has ~465MB avail) Basically, bonnie tries hard to bench the MFS filesystem. The disk goes crazy swapping, but eventually the disk activity stops with everything else. No console messages, no response to console input (a tty), and then, after watching a stupid movie on TV, I pushed reset. Note, if I run bonnie with a -s 10 or 100, it runs fine: Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU MFS-10 10 14211 80.3 35932 71.0 28897 76.0 17938 99.9 77781 99.9 9287.2 197.4 MFS-100 100 14158 84.5 23113 44.9 18733 51.6 13724 79.9 31208 47.3 3445.8 138.2 Details: System runs 2 March 1999 RELENG_3 sources and is configured for SMP (dual PII). Bonnie installed from ports on 3 March. /dev/da0s1a on / (local, soft-updates, writes: sync 5 async 1281) procfs on /proc (local) mfs:24 on /tmp (asynchronous, local, nodev, nosuid, writes: sync 2 async 57) /dev/da0s1f on /usr (local, noatime, soft-updates, writes: sync 2 async 14) /dev/da0s1e on /var (local, noatime, soft-updates, writes: sync 99 async 753) /dev/da0s1g on /data (local, soft-updates, writes: sync 5 async 599) /dev/da0s1h on /work (local, noatime, soft-updates, writes: sync 2 async 0) I would be happy to provide additional information to anyone interested in exploring this issue. Kurt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 14:57:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086C814F7A for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:57:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) Received: (from smap@localhost) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA03578; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 09:56:35 +1100 (EST) Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma003572; Fri, 5 Mar 99 09:56:31 +1100 Received: from localhost (carl@localhost) by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA00553; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 09:56:40 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from carl@xena.aipo.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 09:56:40 +1100 (EST) From: Carl Makin X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. In-Reply-To: <36DE799B.3794FE8B@scc.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Marcel, On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Carl Makin wrote: > > 1641 dsm CALL linux_ipc(0x2,0,0x2,0x380,0) > > 1641 dsm PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL > > 1641 dsm NAMI "dsm.core" > linux_ipc is implemented. The failing syscall [linux_ipc(0x2,...)] has to to > with semaphores (semget). You do have ``options SYSVSEM'' in your kernel Spot ON! Thankyou! Backups and restores now run fine! Thanks, Carl. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 16: 1:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from baynet.baynetworks.com (ns1.BayNetworks.COM [134.177.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D70150A0; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 16:01:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Mike_Kephart@corpeast.BayNetworks.COM) Received: from mailhost.BayNetworks.COM (ns5.corpemea.baynetworks.com [141.251.211.49] (may be forged)) by baynet.baynetworks.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12026; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 15:59:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.corpeast.BayNetworks.COM (ns3.corpeast.baynetworks.com [132.245.135.91]) by mailhost.BayNetworks.COM (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA18000; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 00:47:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from bl-mail2.corpeast.BayNetworks.com (bl-mail2-hme0.corpeast.baynetworks.com [132.245.135.83]) by mailhost.corpeast.BayNetworks.COM (SMI-8.6/BNET-97/05/05-S) with SMTP id SAA21473; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:46:33 -0500 for Received: from baynetworks.com ([132.245.218.109]) by bl-mail2.corpeast.BayNetworks.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-51848U14000L14000S0V35) with ESMTP id com; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:48:06 -0500 Message-ID: <36DF1B54.8D3A895C@baynetworks.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 17:46:29 -0600 From: Mike Kephart Organization: Nortel Networks X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Seal Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: reboot hangs and pccard change questions References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Patrick, I made the time to do a bit of debugging this afternoon and found: - If I define BROKEN_KEYBOARD_RESET in the kernel config (which seemed to require a hack to options, although it's documented in LINT). This doesn't make the laptop actually reboot, but at least the power button works! - Apparently there have been changes in the way the data structures which hook a PCCARD device driver into the startup initialization are defined. Using the macro PCCARD_MODULE() got the Xircom driver going, but I noticed that now the sio driver doesn't register. Can someone familiar with the PCCARD support tell me if I'm missing something? \MikeK Patrick Seal wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Mike Kephart wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have two problems which have shown up after upgrading from > > 3.0-RELEASE to > > 3.1-STABLE (as of 2/3/99 at 18:00 CST). The hardware being used here is > > a > > Dell Latitude CPi laptop. > > > > 1. The "reboot" command now hangs - on this laptop this is > > especially > > irritating since the power button is ineffective. Halt still > works > > fine. > > [ I swear I saw this same problem posted recently, but could not > find > > it in the archives... ] > > THAT WAS ME! Yes, I have the same problem on the same laptop. You might > want to send this stuff to freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG along with > freebsd-questions, that's for laptop stuff. > > I'm going to take out apm from the kernel, then pccard stuff, and keep > reducing to see if I can find the problem. BTW, has anything changed in > the reboot command that might cause a hang after rebooting... > > > > > 2. I'm using the Xircom if_xe 1.14 beta pccard driver from Scott > > Mitchell. Under > > 3.1-STABLE, the driver never gets initialized - the driver name > doesn't > > show up in the "Initializing PC-CARD drivers:" message from > > pccard_configure(). > > I was guessing this may have something to do with the return value > from > > the driver's probe() routine (if_xe always returns 0), but random > > attempts > > at changing this value induced panics. > > > > I'm hoping someone more familiar with the pccard code might have > some > > suggestions. > > > > Thanks, > > \MikeK > > > > ------------------------------------ _____________________________________ > Patrick Seal |"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make > | really crappy operating systems." > Hyperhost - http://www.hyperhost.net| -Linus Torvalds > hosting and Design > > http://www.freebsd.org - http://www.linux.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 18:18:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from firewall.scitec.com.au (fgate.scitec.com.au [203.17.180.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3266615135 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:18:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john.saunders@scitec.com.au) Received: by firewall.scitec.com.au; id NAA06282; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 13:18:27 +1100 (EST) Received: from mailhub.scitec.com.au(203.17.180.131) by fgate.scitec.com.au via smap (3.2) id xma006232; Fri, 5 Mar 99 13:17:56 +1100 Received: from saruman (saruman.scitec.com.au [203.17.182.108]) by mailhub.scitec.com.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA07796 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 13:17:56 +1100 From: "John Saunders" To: "FreeBSD stable" Subject: make world failure Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 13:17:56 +1100 Message-ID: <000601be66ae$61e25c80$6cb611cb@saruman.scitec.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What is going on in 3.1-stable? Source is 3.1-stable cvsupped 1pm May 4th GMT time. These warning are littered through the make world log file, however it fails because /usr/src/lib/libskey/Makefile uses -Werror to treat warnings as errors. I thought the trend in FreeBSD was to remove warnings from the code, given what is happening in -stable and -current (which is far worse) it seems that the trend is to try and generate more warnings than lines of code exist in the tree I haven't seen anybody else email on this issue, why? Thanks. cc -pipe -DPERMIT_CONSOLE -D_SKEY_INTERNAL -I/usr/src/lib/libskey -W -Wall - Werr or -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libskey/skeyaccess.c -o sk eyaccess.o cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/stdio.h:352: warning: `__sputc' defined but not used /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/ctype.h:146: warning: `__maskrune' defined but not used /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/ctype.h:160: warning: `__toupper' defined but n ot used /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/ctype.h:167: warning: `__tolower' defined but n ot used *** Error code 1 Stop. -- . +-------------------------------------------------------+ ,--_|\ | John Saunders mailto:John.Saunders@scitec.com.au | / Oz \ | SCITEC LIMITED Phone +61294289563 Fax +61294289933 | \_,--\_/ | "By the time you make ends meet, they move the ends." | v +-------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 18:31: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip106.houston3.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.12.169.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBBF15063 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:31:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA06709; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 20:31:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 20:31:19 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: John Saunders Cc: FreeBSD stable Subject: Re: make world failure Message-ID: <19990304203119.B6602@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: <000601be66ae$61e25c80$6cb611cb@saruman.scitec.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: <000601be66ae$61e25c80$6cb611cb@saruman.scitec.com.au>; from John Saunders on Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 01:17:56PM +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 4, 1999, John Saunders put this into my mailbox: > What is going on in 3.1-stable? > > Source is 3.1-stable cvsupped 1pm May 4th GMT time. These warning > are littered through the make world log file, however it fails > because /usr/src/lib/libskey/Makefile uses -Werror to treat > warnings as errors. I thought the trend in FreeBSD > was to remove warnings from the code, given what is happening > in -stable and -current (which is far worse) it seems that the > trend is to try and generate more warnings than lines of code > exist in the tree Yes, well... we (they? I'm helping out...)'re working on it. It's not done *yet*. I'm working about through /usr/bin. I'm waiting for my pr to be evaluated -- I patched most of mail(1). -Chris -- Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" int main(int m){main(!main(0));} To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 18:40:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vic.cioe.com (ns1.cioe.com [204.120.165.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BE01512B for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 18:40:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@vic.cioe.com) Received: (from steve@localhost) by vic.cioe.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id VAA14677 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:40:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 21:40:20 -0500 (EST) From: Steve Ames Message-Id: <199903050240.VAA14677@vic.cioe.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: PAM and RADIUS? Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Has anyone gotten telnet authentication working with PAM and RADIUS? I posed this question in freebsd-isp but didn't see any takers. By RADIUS server says that its authenticating just fine but login is still saying denied. Frustrating. Anyone got a working pam.conf they can share? What RADIUS attributes should I be returning to make this work? Where do I find more info on PAM so I can answer such questions myself? -Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 4 23:24:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from calumet.infoteam.com (calumet.infoteam.com [207.2.129.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD941514B for ; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:23:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kmartin@ksm.com) Received: (from kmartin@localhost) by calumet.infoteam.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA05301; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 02:23:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kmartin) Message-Id: <199903050723.CAA05301@calumet.infoteam.com> From: "Kenn Martin" To: "FreeBSD Stable List" Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 02:23:19 -0500 Reply-To: "Kenn Martin" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 98 (4.10.1998) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Celeron systems Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 08:58:43 +0000, Mike Zanker wrote: >At 22:20 03/03/99 , Kenn Martin wrote: > >>We have a couple of new boxes coming in with Celeron processors. We >>run 3.1-STABLE on most systems and will do the same with these. What >>cpu option should be chosen for the kernel config? I would guess >>that it is I586_CPU, but LINT is now a little vague with all of the >>different incarnations of the Pentium. Nothing to be found in the >>Handbook or FAQ either. > >Definitely I686_CPU - a kernel with only I586_CPU defined will not boot. Thanks ... it seems like it would be a good idea to update LINT comments to reflect the new CPUs. kenn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 1:19:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fox.uni-trier.de (fox.uni-trier.de [136.199.8.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C5915118 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 01:19:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blank@fox.uni-trier.de) Received: (from blank@localhost) by fox.uni-trier.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA33851 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:18:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:18:55 +0100 From: User & To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Request to bring sendmail 8.9.3 in STABLE-3.1 Message-ID: <19990305101855.A33788@fox.uni-trier.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 26 FD 71 B5 48 12 42 91 10 1C 4F 74 70 48 6F 89 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I would like to see the latest sendmail 8.9.3 being backported to STABLE-3.1. While 4.0-CURRENT already has it for over a month, it has not yet made its way into STABLE-3.1, where we still have version 8.9.2. I can't think of any stability concerns why this update shouldn't be done. -- Sascha Blank | "I prefer to work behind the scenes. The Student and System Administrator | reward is nearly as great, and the risk at the University of Trier, Germany | is far far less" - Ambassador Mollari in mailto:blank@fox.uni-trier.de | in Babylon 5, "The coming of shadows" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 4:37: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0A914EE3 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 04:36:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 10ItqJ-0006VA-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:36:39 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/8071: some obj-links seem not to be taken Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 14:36:39 +0200 Message-ID: <24995.920637399@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi folks, I'm looking at misc/8071, which claims that support for OBJLINK is broken in the build for 3.0-BETA. I've tested a full CURRENT ``make world'' using OBJLINK without a single "Warning: Object directory not changed from original" message. As far as I'm concerned, that means that "all obj-links seem to be taken". :-) Whether or not the PR applies to the 2.2 branch is irrelevant, since active development on the branch is over. All I need is feedback on whether it's a problem in 3.1-STABLE. If anyone's doing something like ``make -DOBJLINK world 2>&1 | tee world.log'', I'd greatly appreciate a copy of world.log mailed to me privately. Thanks, Sheldon. PS: I can assure you that the rest of the list members would not appreciate a copy at all. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 5: 6:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from megaweapon.zigg.com (megaweapon.zigg.com [206.114.60.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745B11515D for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 05:05:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@zigg.com) Received: from localhost (matt@localhost) by megaweapon.zigg.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA06799; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 08:00:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@zigg.com) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 07:59:59 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Behrens To: User & Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request to bring sendmail 8.9.3 in STABLE-3.1 In-Reply-To: <19990305101855.A33788@fox.uni-trier.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, User & wrote: : I would like to see the latest sendmail 8.9.3 being backported to : STABLE-3.1. While 4.0-CURRENT already has it for over a month, it has : not yet made its way into STABLE-3.1, where we still have version 8.9.2. : I can't think of any stability concerns why this update shouldn't be : done. Add my vote as well. Matt Behrens Owner/Administrator, zigg.com Chief Engineer, Nameless IRC Network To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 5:51:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mortar.carlson.com (mortar.carlson.com [208.240.12.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347FF15118 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 05:51:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from mortar.carlson.com (root@localhost) by mortar.carlson.com with ESMTP id HAA05346 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 07:50:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from w142844 ([172.25.99.35]) by mortar.carlson.com with SMTP id HAA05342 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 07:50:49 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <003101be670f$3da4e660$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: "FreeBSD-Stable" Subject: How to write a device driver? Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 07:51:12 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG All, I recall a discussion a while back about there being some sort of shell script that will create a skeleton device driver for you. Can anybody elaborate on that. I would just like to "play around" with this and perhaps learn a thing or two about the kernel that may come in handy someday (soon?). Also, are there any good examples out there to learn from? I have looked at joy.c VERY briefly, but there certainly is a lack of comments in the code. Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 6:14:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.fleximedia.pt (shiva.fleximedia.pt [195.61.93.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F50151A7 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 06:14:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mfer@leirianet.pt) Received: from osiris.fleximedia.pt (lists.leirianet.pt [195.61.93.61]) by mail.fleximedia.pt (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id OAA30039 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:13:49 GMT (envelope-from mfer@leirianet.pt) From: M Ferreira To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: kvm_read error while snmpwalking Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 14:13:55 GMT Reply-To: M Ferreira Message-ID: <36dfe537.6107525@mail.fleximedia.pt> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I'm not managing to snmpwalk a -STABLE box running ucd-snmpd. The log shows: var_ip: ip.ipReasmOKs.0 0 var_ip: ip.ipReasmFails.0 0 var_ip: ip.ipReasmFails.0 0 var_ip: ip.ipFragOKs.0 0 var_ip: ip.ipFragOKs.0 0 var_ip: ip.ipFragFails.0 0 var_ip: ip.ipFragFails.0 0 var_ip: ip.ipFragCreates.0 0 var_ip: ip.ipNetToMediaTable.ipNetToMediaEntry.ipNetToMediaType.1.195.61.93.62 0 var_ip: ip.ipRoutingDiscards.0 0 kvm_read(*, da, 0xefbfb3f8, 96) =3D 0: kvm_read: Bad address TCP_Count_Connections - inpcb: Bad address kvm_read(*, da, 0xefbfb3f8, 96) =3D 0: kvm_read: Bad address TCP_Count_Connections - inpcb: Bad address kvm_read(*, da, 0xefbfb3f8, 96) =3D 0: kvm_read: Bad address TCP_Count_Connections - inpcb: Bad address kvm_read(*, da, 0xefbfb3f8, 96) =3D 0: kvm_read: Bad address TCP_Count_Connections - inpcb: Bad address kvm_read(*, da, 0xefbfb3f8, 96) =3D 0: kvm_read: Bad address TCP_Count_Connections - inpcb: Bad address kvm_read(*, da, 0xefbfb3f8, 96) =3D 0: kvm_read: Bad address TCP_Count_Connections - inpcb: Bad address kvm_read(*, da, 0xefbfb3f8, 96) =3D 0: kvm_read: Bad address TCP_Count_Connections - inpcb: Bad address Is this fbsd or ucd-snmpd related? tia M Ferreira To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 6:50:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D948714F79 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 06:50:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.1/8.8.8) id GAA00482; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 06:50:22 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda00479; Fri Mar 5 06:50:08 1999 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.2/8.9.1) id GAA10751; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 06:50:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903051450.GAA10751@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Received: from localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "passer.osg.gov.bc.ca" via SMTP by localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdv10742; Fri Mar 5 06:49:37 1999 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE X-Sender: cschuber To: Matt Behrens Cc: User & , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request to bring sendmail 8.9.3 in STABLE-3.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Mar 1999 07:59:59 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 06:49:36 -0800 From: Cy Schubert Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Matt Behrens writes: > On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, User & wrote: > > : I would like to see the latest sendmail 8.9.3 being backported to > : STABLE-3.1. While 4.0-CURRENT already has it for over a month, it has > : not yet made its way into STABLE-3.1, where we still have version 8.9.2. > : I can't think of any stability concerns why this update shouldn't be > : done. > > Add my vote as well. > > Matt Behrens > Owner/Administrator, zigg.com > Chief Engineer, Nameless IRC Network Count me in too. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 7: 9:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kiev.sovam.com (kiev.sovam.com [194.186.143.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384531519E for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 07:09:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doka@kiev.sovam.com) Received: from doka (helo=localhost) by kiev.sovam.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 10IwDH-0007mA-00; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 17:08:31 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 17:08:31 +0200 (EET) From: Vladimir Litovka Reply-To: doka@kiev.sovam.com To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request to bring sendmail 8.9.3 in STABLE-3.1 In-Reply-To: <199903051450.GAA10751@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Cy Schubert wrote: > > : I would like to see the latest sendmail 8.9.3 being backported to > > > > Add my vote as well. > > > Count me in too. Let's make exim as main MTA in FreeBSD :-) /doka To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 7:35:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from easeway.com (ns1.easeway.com [209.69.39.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4D41517F for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 07:35:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlucas@easeway.com) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by easeway.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) id KAA15966 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:31:47 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199903051531.KAA15966@easeway.com> Subject: old lpt just won't die To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:31:47 -0500 (EST) From: mwlucas@exceptionet.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I have a 3.1-stable box that I need to get printing properly. So, I update my kernel config: # Parallel port controller ppbus0 device lpt0 at ppbus? device ppc0 at isa? port? net irq 7 make depend all install, and get on boot: lpt0 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa lpt0: Interrupt-driven port lp0: TCP/IP capable interface lpt-266372352: this driver is deprecated; use ppbus instead. Okay, fine. Perhaps there's old cruft lying around. I do a "config -r", make depend all install. Same thing. So, any idea what's going on? I have ppbus running fine on my -current box. ==ml -- Michael Lucas | Exceptionet, Inc. | www.exceptionet.com "Exceptional Networking" | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 7:41:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8793D151B3 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 07:39:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@scc.nl) Received: from scones.sup.scc.nl (i341.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.67.102]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA13591 from for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 16:39:30 +0100 (MET) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by scones.sup.scc.nl (8.9.2/8.9.1) id QAA93098 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 16:15:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by scones.sup.scc.nl with netnews for stable@FreeBSD.ORG (stable@FreeBSD.ORG) To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 16:15:32 +0100 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <36DFF514.9878CC7C@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <36dfe537.6107525@mail.fleximedia.pt> Subject: Re: kvm_read error while snmpwalking Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG M Ferreira wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm not managing to snmpwalk a -STABLE box running ucd-snmpd. > The log shows: > Is this fbsd or ucd-snmpd related? There are some patches for the ucd-snmp-3.5.3 port. They can be found in PR/8908 and PR/8909. marcel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 8: 7:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mortar.carlson.com (mortar.carlson.com [208.240.12.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02194151B5 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 08:07:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from mortar.carlson.com (root@localhost) by mortar.carlson.com with ESMTP id KAA08442; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:07:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from w142844 ([172.25.99.35]) by mortar.carlson.com with SMTP id KAA08438; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:06:59 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <00d501be6722$424798d0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: , Subject: Re: old lpt just won't die Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:07:24 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It should be: controller ppbus0 device nlpt0 at ppbus? device ppc0 at isa? port? net irq 7 Note that it is nlpt, not lpt. It is all in the LINT file for your viewing pleasure. Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com -----Original Message----- From: mwlucas@exceptionet.com To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Friday, March 05, 1999 9:44 AM Subject: old lpt just won't die >Hello, > >I have a 3.1-stable box that I need to get printing properly. > >So, I update my kernel config: > ># Parallel port >controller ppbus0 >device lpt0 at ppbus? >device ppc0 at isa? port? net irq 7 > >make depend all install, and get on boot: > >lpt0 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa >lpt0: Interrupt-driven port >lp0: TCP/IP capable interface >lpt-266372352: this driver is deprecated; use ppbus instead. > >Okay, fine. Perhaps there's old cruft lying around. I do a "config -r", >make depend all install. > >Same thing. So, any idea what's going on? I have ppbus running fine on >my -current box. > >==ml >-- >Michael Lucas | >Exceptionet, Inc. | www.exceptionet.com >"Exceptional Networking" | > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 8:58:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horse.supranet.net (horse.supranet.net [205.164.160.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EF4151C5 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 08:58:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gavinb@supranet.net) Received: from rat (rat.supranet.net [205.164.160.15]) by horse.supranet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA18609 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:58:36 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990305105214.00d53630@mail.supranet.net> X-Sender: gavinb@mail.supranet.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 10:59:38 -0600 To: FreeBSD-Stable@freebsd.org From: Benjamin Gavin Subject: Question about Natd/IPFW Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, It's me again, finally having resolved my problems with NATd and IIS 4.0. There was a twofold answer to the problem: 1) This doesn't really involve FreeBSD, but IIS4 has a bug that it won't necessarily reply on the same ethernet interface that it receives the request on. (Leave it to M$...) 2) The following two lines prevent the retranslation of the internal IP when the packets come back out from the web server through the firewall: $fwcmd add 100 pass all from any to any via lo0 $fwcmd add 200 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 To test it I ran tcpdump on the external interface of the firewall. What I saw when these two rules were in the ipfw configuration was the following: 1) The request comes into the server, gets redirected through natd to the internal IP 2) The reply from the internal machine gets passed through the firewall, and is received at the requesting host _WITH THE INTERNAL IP NUMBER STILL ASSIGNED TO THE PACKET_. I was doing a tcpdump on both the requesting host and the firewall. However, by removing these rules, the internal IP is successfully retranslated and the request is sent to the host with the alias address attached to the packet. This only happens to packets that are redirected using the redirect_port/redirect_address directives to NATd. Is this a bug?? Needless to say it was not obvious to me how these two rules could cause the packets not to be re-aliased. Can anyone offer an explanation? Thanks, Ben Gavin /--------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Benjamin Gavin - Senior Consultant *********** NO SPAM!! ************ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 11:57:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.force9.co.uk [195.166.136.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9940E15210 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:56:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (keep.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.8]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA00735; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 19:47:49 GMT (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09258; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 16:34:30 GMT (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199903051634.QAA09258@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: "FreeBSD-Stable" Subject: Re: How to write a device driver? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Mar 1999 07:51:12 CST." <003101be670f$3da4e660$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 16:34:30 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > All, > > I recall a discussion a while back about there being some sort of shell > script that will create a skeleton device driver for you. Can anybody > elaborate on that. I would just like to "play around" with this and perhaps > learn a thing or two about the kernel that may come in handy someday > (soon?). Also, are there any good examples out there to learn from? I have > looked at joy.c VERY briefly, but there certainly is a lack of comments in > the code. /usr/share/examples/drivers/README > Tom Veldhouse > veldy@visi.com -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 12: 3:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mortar.carlson.com (mortar.carlson.com [208.240.12.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC40B15151 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 12:03:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from mortar.carlson.com (root@localhost) by mortar.carlson.com with ESMTP id OAA18629; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:02:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from w142844 ([172.25.99.35]) by mortar.carlson.com with SMTP id OAA18625; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:02:20 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <00bf01be6743$26f25cc0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: "Brian Somers" Cc: "FreeBSD-Stable" Subject: Re: How to write a device driver? Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:02:47 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The obvious I guess. I never thought to look there, if it was in the handbook, I missed it. Thanks, Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com > /usr/share/examples/drivers/README > >> Tom Veldhouse >> veldy@visi.com > >-- >Brian > >Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 13:28:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from set.spradley.tmi.net (set.spradley.tmi.net [207.170.107.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F6F1525E for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 13:28:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tsprad@set.spradley.tmi.net) Received: from set.spradley.tmi.net (localhost.spradley.tmi.net [127.0.0.1]) by set.spradley.tmi.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA02565; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:28:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tsprad@set.spradley.tmi.net) Message-Id: <199903052128.PAA02565@set.spradley.tmi.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: mwlucas@exceptionet.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: old lpt just won't die In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Mar 1999 10:31:47 EST." <199903051531.KAA15966@easeway.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 15:28:14 -0600 From: Ted Spradley Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > make depend all install, and get on boot: Try "make depend && make all install". The second instance of make will use the dependencies created by the first. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 13:34: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from stumpy.dannyland.org (danman.isdn.uiuc.edu [192.17.16.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBDDF14EC2 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 13:34:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dannyman@stumpy.dannyland.org) Received: (qmail 29890 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Mar 1999 21:33:54 -0000 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:33:54 -0600 From: dannyman To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: installing netscape Message-ID: <19990305153354.F29030@stumpy.dannyland.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu X-URL: http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG i just wandered over to 3.0-RELEASE and done made myself an elf system. went to reinstall netscape and it complained that i had no more aout X libraries. what is the best advice to get netscape installed? thanks, danny -- dannyman - http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 13:43:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mur3.odyssey.on.ca (mur3.odyssey.on.ca [209.213.224.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5908114D78 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 13:43:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kevin.v@odyssey.on.ca) Received: from odyssey.on.ca (ts22-14.odyssey.on.ca [209.213.233.114]) by mur3.odyssey.on.ca (8.9.1/Odyssey) with ESMTP id QAA04409 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 16:43:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <36E05018.BE35C41B@odyssey.on.ca> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 16:43:52 -0500 From: "kevin.v" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installing netscape References: <19990305153354.F29030@stumpy.dannyland.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > i just wandered over to 3.0-RELEASE and done made myself an elf system. > went to reinstall netscape and it complained that i had no more aout X > libraries. > what is the best advice to get netscape installed? i have recently upgraded to a 3.1 system, and stupidly upgraded the linux_libs port as well (moving it to glibc i believe). however, most of the linux binaries i use are aout -- whats the best way to get both to work? or atleast aout again? thanks, kevin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 14:29:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DF814F84 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:28:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfieber@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA24898; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 17:28:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 17:28:26 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, mwlucas@exceptionet.com Subject: Re: old lpt just won't die In-Reply-To: <00d501be6722$424798d0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > It should be: > > controller ppbus0 > device nlpt0 at ppbus? > device ppc0 at isa? port? net irq 7 > > Note that it is nlpt, not lpt. It is all in the LINT file for your viewing > pleasure. Note that you may need to change the "net" to "tty" in the ppc0 line. Many people (myself included) have found nlpt0 to be non-functional without that change. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 14:30: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.hsonline.net (mail.hsonline.net [205.243.33.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFBAE150B8 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:30:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zamy27@hsonline.net) Received: from hsonline.net [208.10.214.166] by mail.hsonline.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.07) id AAD91F301D6; Fri, 05 Mar 1999 17:29:45 -0500 Message-ID: <36DFF81F.8084ED57@hsonline.net> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 17:28:32 +0200 From: Scott Myron X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: [Fwd: Help!!] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------239149BE0742289C7CE68456" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------239149BE0742289C7CE68456 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please help! --------------239149BE0742289C7CE68456 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mel.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.132] by mail.hsonline.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.07) id AC7888F013E; Fri, 05 Mar 1999 08:30:32 -0500 Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (mailhub.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.80]) by mel.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id OAA21251 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:27:58 +0100 Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id OAA12456 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:26:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA08471 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:03:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from telspace.alcatel.fr (nairobi.telspace.alcatel.fr) by telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA21821; Fri, 5 Mar 99 14:12:50 +0100 Sender: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr Message-Id: <36DFD986.9FEF421F@telspace.alcatel.fr> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 14:17:58 +0100 From: HERBELOT Thierry Organization: Alcatel Telspace X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4m) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Myron Subject: Re: Help!! References: <36DF6506.51B2F6F5@hsonline.net> <36DFCCDB.EF5F18DB@telspace.alcatel.fr> <36DF70FF.4758DEDA@hsonline.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Well **I** don't see what happens - you could forward your more complete message to the -Stable mailing list with a more accurate subject (there are certainly more knowledgeable people there) TfH PS : try "Error: Unknown pseudo-op: `.lmng'" as your subject Scott Myron wrote: > > I'm running the generic 3.0-RELEASE kernel, i have the 3.1-stable > sources(RELENG_3), i typed "make buildworld" to remake the system, this is the > error. > > cc -pg -nostdinc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline > -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline/../../../contrib/libreadline > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DRL_LIBRARY_VERSION='"2.2"' > -I/usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c > /usr/src/gnu/lib/libreadline/../../../contrib/libreadline/keymaps.c -o > keymaps.po > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > {standard input}:1771: Error: Unknown pseudo-op: `.lmng' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > HERBELOT Thierry wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We can't help you unless you tell us : > > - which version of FreeBSD you are running (uname -a) > > - which version of the sources you have feched via cvsup (what is the > > default tag in your supfile ?) > > - what command you have typed to make the world (make buildworld ?) > > - what the error exactly is (the lines written before the "assembler > > error") > > > > TfH > > > > Scott Myron wrote: > > > > > > Hi, last night i tried to make buildworld(for the 4th time this week), > > > and it failed again!. i got some "assembler error" if you need the exact > > > error i can paste it to you. but, is this a source problem(i'm using > > > -stable source) or is this my computer? thanks. > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message --------------239149BE0742289C7CE68456-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 15:39:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles168.castles.com [208.214.165.168]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF99314C35 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:39:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA07098; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199903052334.PAA07098@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Keith Stevenson Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: IBM reps/ADSM client (Was Re: Linux emulation failures under 3.1-STABLE. ) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Mar 1999 20:05:53 EST." <19990302200553.A10700@homer.louisville.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 15:34:13 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I got it running under 2.2.8 a few months ago, but every time I started it, > the ADSM server running on our big OS/390 mainframe abended. This is widely > considered to be a bad thing. (The mainframe's administrator certainly > thought so.) I saw a posting to one of the FreeBSD lists about a week ago > which identified the cause of the server's death as a buffer overflow > problem. Last time I checked, IBM listed the Linux client as unsupported, so > I don't imaging they are very interested in hearing that we are having problems > running it in emulation mode. (I am leaning on our regional support rep to > suggest a FreeBSD port. I don't think I'm going to get very far though.) That may depends on how well we go over the next few months leaning on IBM. If anyone/everyone reading this that has contact with an IBM rep mentions FreeBSD as much as possible in the context of a server OS on IBM i386 hardware, we may be able to slingshot on the Linux-on-Netfinity moves that are happening at the moment. We had some very favourable interactions with IBM representatives at Linuxworld, some of whom actively sought us out having been pointed our way by external sources. There's some hope we can build on these contacts (and resolve the outstanding hardware issues as well). -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 5 15:55:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.6.61.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039B915116 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:55:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA207846332; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 18:25:32 -0500 Subject: gnome port? To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 18:25:31 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 633 Message-Id: <19990305235533.039B915116@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Now that 1.0 is out, I am anxious to rty gnome. Unfortunately at least one major component of it fails to compile on my 3.0 system (Orbit). Will there be a port soon? -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 Westvaco Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 6 7:17:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dpi.dgtu.donetsk.ua (dgtu-dipt-38.4K.dgtu.donetsk.ua [194.44.183.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9156514CEC for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 07:14:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yk@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua) Received: from info.dgtu.donetsk.ua (root@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua [194.44.183.7]) by dpi.dgtu.donetsk.ua (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA02067 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 17:14:14 +0200 (EET) Received: (from yk@localhost) by info.dgtu.donetsk.ua (8.8.7/8.8.5) id RAA11280 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 17:14:12 +0200 (EET) From: Yury Yaroshevsky Message-Id: <199903061514.RAA11280@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua> Subject: 3.1-STABLE - also freeze :((( [see crashe 3.1-RELEASE ...] To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 17:14:12 +0200 (EET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi All! 03.03.99 I'm wrote about freeze 3.1-RELEASE after starting this script : -------- cut here ------- #! /bin/sh for j in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 do echo -n $j nohup sh -c 'while :; do find / -type f |xargs fgrep fticom; done' >/dev/null 2>&1 & echo done ------------------------ At next day I'm upgrade my 3.1-R box to 3.1-S, but without visible effects. After 2-3 min perfoming this script, my box can't start any processes. I'm can't create any connections with my box, also from console. 2.2-STABLE is not freeze and fine work atfer starting crash script about 5-6 hours, until I'm kill my script. -- Yury V. Yaroshevsky | Donetsk State Technical University YY18-RIPE | (380 622) 356455 yk@dgtu.donetsk.ua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 6 9: 7:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip222.houston3.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.12.169.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BE41525F for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 09:07:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA29158; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 11:07:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 11:07:06 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: Yury Yaroshevsky Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.1-STABLE - also freeze :((( [see crashe 3.1-RELEASE ...] Message-ID: <19990306110706.A29044@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: <199903061514.RAA11280@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: <199903061514.RAA11280@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua>; from Yury Yaroshevsky on Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 05:14:12PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Mar 6, 1999, Yury Yaroshevsky put this into my mailbox: > Hi All! > > 03.03.99 I'm wrote about freeze 3.1-RELEASE after starting this script : > > -------- cut here ------- > #! /bin/sh > > for j in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > do > echo -n $j > nohup sh -c 'while :; do find / -type f |xargs fgrep fticom; done' >/dev/null > 2>&1 & > echo > done > ------------------------ > > At next day I'm upgrade my 3.1-R box to 3.1-S, but without visible effects. > After 2-3 min perfoming this script, my box can't start any processes. Take a real good look at what you're doing. For each number out of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10: * You spawn one process. * It continually spawns more and more processes, sticking them into the background. This is shooting yourself in the foot. What do you plan on doing with that, anyway? (This will exceed the max process limit very quickly.) > I'm can't create any connections with my box, also from console. > > 2.2-STABLE is not freeze and fine work atfer starting crash script about 5-6 > hours, until I'm kill my script. > > -- > Yury V. Yaroshevsky | Donetsk State Technical University > YY18-RIPE | (380 622) 356455 yk@dgtu.donetsk.ua > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" "OK, now let's look at four dimensions on the blackboard." -- Dr. Joy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 6 9:11:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from holly.dyndns.org (ip222.houston3.tx.pub-ip.psi.net [38.12.169.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D968D1525F for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 09:11:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@holly.dyndns.org) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA29206; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 11:11:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 11:11:22 -0600 From: Chris Costello To: Yury Yaroshevsky Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.1-STABLE - also freeze :((( [see crashe 3.1-RELEASE ...] Message-ID: <19990306111122.B29044@holly.dyndns.org> Reply-To: chris@calldei.com References: <199903061514.RAA11280@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua> <19990306110706.A29044@holly.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3us In-Reply-To: <19990306110706.A29044@holly.dyndns.org>; from Chris Costello on Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 11:07:06AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Mar 6, 1999, Chris Costello put this into my mailbox: > On Sat, Mar 6, 1999, Yury Yaroshevsky put this into my mailbox: > > Hi All! > > > > 03.03.99 I'm wrote about freeze 3.1-RELEASE after starting this script : > > > > -------- cut here ------- > > #! /bin/sh > > > > for j in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > > do > > echo -n $j > > nohup sh -c 'while :; do find / -type f |xargs fgrep fticom; done' >/dev/null > > 2>&1 & > > echo > > done > > ------------------------ > > > > At next day I'm upgrade my 3.1-R box to 3.1-S, but without visible effects. > > After 2-3 min perfoming this script, my box can't start any processes. > > Take a real good look at what you're doing. > > For each number out of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10: > > * You spawn one process. > * It continually spawns more and more processes, sticking them > into the background. Whoops! It doesn't stick those into the background... but it does stick the sh processes into the background while they continually run find over and over. > > This is shooting yourself in the foot. What do you plan on > doing with that, anyway? > > (This will exceed the max process limit very quickly.) > > > I'm can't create any connections with my box, also from console. > > > > 2.2-STABLE is not freeze and fine work atfer starting crash script about 5-6 > > hours, until I'm kill my script. > > > > -- > > Yury V. Yaroshevsky | Donetsk State Technical University > > YY18-RIPE | (380 622) 356455 yk@dgtu.donetsk.ua > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > -- > Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" > > "OK, now let's look at four dimensions on the blackboard." > -- Dr. Joy > -- Powered by FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. "The Power to Serve!" "OK, now let's look at four dimensions on the blackboard." -- Dr. Joy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 6 15:41:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lake1.lakefield.net (lake1.lakefield.net [198.70.64.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A5B14C30 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 15:41:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aheffner@lakefield.net) Received: from enterprise.muriel.dyn.ml.org (stonerd-4-7.lakefield.net [206.40.102.73]) by lake1.lakefield.net (8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA12052; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 17:41:26 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19990305153354.F29030@stumpy.dannyland.org> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 17:41:44 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Heffner To: dannyman Subject: RE: installing netscape Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I found on my system the make hadn't moved the X libs from /usr/X11R6/lib to it's aout subdir. You can manually do this and either run ldconfig again or reboot. Also make sure your rc.conf file has the ldconfig_paths set to the correct directories. You could also rebuild X if you want. On 05-Mar-99 dannyman wrote: | i just wandered over to 3.0-RELEASE and done made myself an elf system. | | went to reinstall netscape and it complained that i had no more aout X | libraries. | | what is the best advice to get netscape installed? | | thanks, | danny | | -- | dannyman - http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ ------------------------------------- Mike Heffner Manitowoc, WI 54220 ICQ# 882073 Date: 06-Mar-99 Time: 17:38:22 ------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 6 18:16:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles117.castles.com [208.214.165.117]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553AC14BFF for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 18:16:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA01034; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 18:11:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199903070211.SAA01034@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Tim Tsai Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using Linux libraries In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Mar 1999 17:36:55 CST." <19990302173655.A13794@futuresouth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 18:11:04 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > We currently have a Linux box running Sybase's client software (as > libraries). The box also runs Perl with the DBI::Sybase interface and > sqsh, both using these libraries. > > Is there anyway I can get this whole environment to work under FreeBSD > (any version)? I guess for sqsh, I should be able to run it under the > Linux emulation (it doesn't need any other files other than the library). > What about the Linux perl? As a general rule, if the Linux library makes any system calls, you won't be able to link it into a FreeBSD binary. > Lastly, any chance of cross compiling for the Linux environment using > FreeBSD - otherwise we'll have to keep the Linux box around just for > development. Yes; see the Linux-devel port. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 6 19:24:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailsorter-105.bryant.webtv.net (mailsorter-105.iap.bryant.webtv.net [209.240.198.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79E7151B4 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 19:24:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from les-saddle-up-1@webtv.net) Received: from mailtod-171.iap.bryant.webtv.net (mailtod-171.iap.bryant.webtv.net [209.240.199.81]) by mailsorter-105.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.gso.08Dec97) with ESMTP id TAA00765; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 19:24:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from production@localhost) by mailtod-171.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/mt.gso.26Feb98) id TAA13559; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 19:24:32 -0800 (PST) X-WebTV-Signature: 1 ETAtAhUAqMo5RJd8dNZfWUANYTDVmu6aeNoCFFZJZmMNUkh93KfhSq7UQUFEU5wS From: les-saddle-up-1@webtv.net (Leslie Labelle) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 21:24:32 -0600 (CST) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: stables please send me all info Message-ID: <1936-36E1F170-1299@mailtod-171.iap.bryant.webtv.net> Content-Disposition: Inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit MIME-Version: 1.0 (WebTV) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG building them To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 6 22:29:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.directlink.net (mailhost.directlink.net [207.239.163.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E7314CAC for ; Sat, 6 Mar 1999 22:29:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billh@directlink.net) Received: from directlink.net [207.239.163.119] by mailhost.directlink.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.01) id AEF812DE00B0; Sun, 07 Mar 1999 01:47:04 EST Message-ID: <36E21BC3.6E03C028@directlink.net> Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 00:25:07 -0600 From: Bill Hamilton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd stable Subject: Make Upgrade Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Trying to upgrade from 3.0R to 3.1 Current. I'm failing in telnetd.c . I've tried removing it and cvsupping again. Same error: telnetd.o: In function `telnet': telnetd.o(.text+0xc7f): undefined reference to `Getstr' telnetd.o(.text+0xc90): undefined reference to `Getstr' telnetd.o(.text+0xca1): undefined reference to `Getstr' telnetd.o(.text+0xcae): undefined reference to `Getstr' The code looks like: if (getent(defent, "default") == 1) { char *Getstr(); char *cp=defstrs; HE = Getstr("he", &cp); HN = Getstr("hn", &cp); IM = Getstr("im", &cp); IF = Getstr("if", &cp); This seems to be an ncurses function, but ncurses.h is not included. Is anybody getting this? What's the deal? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message