From owner-freebsd-hubs  Thu Nov 16  1:41:39 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
Received: from r2d2.fdn.fr (unknown [193.252.119.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744E137B4CF
	for <freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 01:41:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by r2d2.fdn.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/FDN) with UUCP id KAA01904
	for freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 10:41:28 +0100
Received: (from bayartb@localhost)
	by edgard.fdn.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id KAA01253
	for freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 10:40:41 +0100
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 10:40:41 +0100
From: Benjamin BAYART <bayartb@edgard.fdn.fr>
To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
Subject: Troubles with ISO images
Message-ID: <20001116104041.B1190@edgard.fdn.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Hi,

As I got troubles this night while mirroring the
4.2-RC1 iso image for alpha architectures, I got
a close look to it this morning and found some
strange things.

The CHECKSUM.MD5 file in releases/alpha/ISO-IMAGES
tells about 3 ISO images: the ones for 4.0, 4.1
and 4.1.1. There is no ISO image for 4.1.1 for
alpha (at least on the site i'm mirroring from)
and there is one for 4.2-RC1.

At least, the checksums for the 4.0 and 4.1 images
are the good ones.

Is that normal, a mistake, a temporary misfeature?
Any hint about this?

Regards,

	Benjamin.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message