From owner-freebsd-afs Thu Apr 26 9:17:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org Received: from peorth.iteration.net (peorth.iteration.net [208.190.180.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBAA37B422; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:17:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keichii@peorth.iteration.net) Received: by peorth.iteration.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9D02959475; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 11:17:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 11:17:30 -0500 From: "Michael C . Wu" To: Robert Watson Cc: Tom Maher , freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org, port-freebsd@openafs.org Subject: Re: Build fix Message-ID: <20010426111730.A85910@peorth.iteration.net> Reply-To: "Michael C . Wu" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from rwatson@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:24:43PM -0400 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5025 F691 F943 8128 48A8 5025 77CE 29C5 8FA1 2E20 X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x8FA12E20 Sender: owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:24:43PM -0400, Robert Watson scribbled: | On 20 Apr 2001, Tom Maher wrote: If we ever plan on importing OpenAFS, should our development and porting platform be 5.0-CURRENT instead? I realize the similiarities in toolchains, etc. However, Since OpenAFS is technically a ``filesystem,'' with the precedence of NFS and Coda, we should at least make sure it works with our development platform. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | keichii@iteration.net | keichii@freebsd.org | | http://iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-afs" in the body of the message