From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 4 2: 9:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from smarthost1.mail.easynet.fr (smarthost1.mail.easynet.fr [212.180.1.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCA137B71A for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 02:09:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fonvi@easynet.fr) Received: from mx1.mail.easynet.fr (slb-1-sippriv.mail.easynet.fr [10.0.1.57]) by smarthost1.mail.easynet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87DEB87F; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:09:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from vobiscum.styx.org (adsl-92-1-215.pops.easynet.fr [212.11.34.215]) by mx1.mail.easynet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF8EB6B0; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:09:31 +0100 (CET) Received: (from marc@localhost) by vobiscum.styx.org (8.11.1/8.9.3/ - 6/08/98) id f24AD2802569; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:13:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:13:02 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Matt of the Long Red Hair Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doscmd booting floppy on 4.1.1-STABLE Message-ID: <20010304111302.B862@vobiscum.styx.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mattp@conundrum.com on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 02:04:55PM -0500 X-Useless-Header: Black Metal inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 02:04:55PM -0500, Matt of the Long Red Hair wrote: > > I haven't heard back from anyone, so I'm guessing this is something new.. > nobody's seen it before? > > On the off chance that it'd been fixed recently, I cvsup'd a new 4.1.1-S and > built a new world, but no change on DOS 5.0 and DOS 6.22 > I run doscmd with 3.5-S and 4.2-S without any problems, but i use floppy image instead of real floppy. > I also tried booting the current FreeDOS (beta5) but that also failed, except > with a totally different error: > > % doscmd -b > Signal 4 from DOS program > > ax=1fff bx=2601 cx=0a78 dx=07b8 > si=5000 di=6be8 sp=13e6 bp=0000 > cs=045e ss=0000 ds=43eb es=468a > ip=c56c eflags=b0206 > 63 61 6e 6e 6f 74 20 61 6c 6c 6f 63 61 74 65 20 > arpl %sp,0x6e(%bx+%di) > 045e:c56c Illegal instruction > Here FreeDOS hangs too. Wait for FreeBSDzine March issue (in few days), i wrote an article about doscmd for that issue (www.freebsdzine.org). Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 4 2: 9:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from smarthost2.mail.easynet.fr (smarthost2.mail.easynet.fr [212.180.1.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132B837B721 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 02:09:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fonvi@easynet.fr) Received: from mx1.mail.easynet.fr (slb-1-sippriv.mail.easynet.fr [10.0.1.57]) by smarthost2.mail.easynet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C14BE40; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:09:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from vobiscum.styx.org (adsl-92-1-215.pops.easynet.fr [212.11.34.215]) by mx1.mail.easynet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DA6B6AF; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:09:30 +0100 (CET) Received: (from marc@localhost) by vobiscum.styx.org (8.11.1/8.9.3/ - 6/08/98) id f24A5KU02550; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:05:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:05:15 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille To: The Babbler Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking Message-ID: <20010304110515.A862@vobiscum.styx.org> References: <3AA1B01B.9F2626D0@babbleon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <3AA1B01B.9F2626D0@babbleon.org>; from bts@babbleon.org on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:01:47PM -0500 X-Useless-Header: Black Metal inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:01:47PM -0500, The Babbler wrote: > > I'm trying to get networking going with vmware under FreeBSD. > > I was going to set up host-only networking and use NATD to get to the > Great Wide World under vmware. This is kinda lucky since host-only is > apparently the only sort of networking that vmware supports under > FreeBSD. > [snip] > > PS: If nothing else I'm sure I can do the natd route, but I hate to do > it if it's not really necessary. > [snip] I spent long time playing with vmware and network, and i never managed to do networking, with the rest of the world, without using natd. If someone could show me how to avoid natd, i'm interested too :) But i think the natd solution is very easy to deal with, so ... Marc Ps: it won't help you, but it could help someone else with networking: http://www.freebsdzine.org/200102/vmware2.php3 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 4 4: 4:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from aeon.conundrum.com (aeon.conundrum.com [216.191.219.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4737537B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 04:04:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mattp@conundrum.com) Received: from smtp.conundrum.com (smtp.conundrum.com [216.191.219.134]) by aeon.conundrum.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA78786; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 07:04:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mattp@conundrum.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 07:04:32 -0500 (EST) From: Matt of the Long Red Hair To: Marc Fonvieille Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: doscmd booting floppy on 4.1.1-STABLE In-Reply-To: <20010304111302.B862@vobiscum.styx.org> Message-ID: X-URL: http://www.conundrum.com/~mattp/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 40 E8 24 BC C1 98 00 F2 56 2F F6 7B 36 34 58 01 X-NIC-Handle: MP1229 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > I run doscmd with 3.5-S and 4.2-S without any problems, but i use floppy > image instead of real floppy. I actually misspoke (mistyped?) myself.. the last cvsup I did, two days ago now, was to 4.2-S.. still the same problem with an IBM DOS 5.0 floppy. I tried to dd an image, and boot from that but there was no difference. What flavour of DOS are you using? > Wait for FreeBSDzine March issue (in few days), i wrote an article about > doscmd for that issue (www.freebsdzine.org). Can't wait to see it. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ``You've got people like Bill Gates, our largest customer, who run around saying bandwidth should be free. Well, we think software should be free.'' -- John Sidgmore COO MCI-WorldCom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 4 11:22:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ernie.sesamestreet.net (p3EE38E8E.dip.t-dialin.net [62.227.142.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0EF637B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:22:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: (qmail 15085 invoked by uid 83); 4 Mar 2001 19:22:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sina.sesamestreet.net) (192.168.168.200) by ernie.sesamestreet.net with SMTP; 4 Mar 2001 19:22:16 -0000 Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 20:23:49 +0100 From: Oliver Lehmann To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: glib Message-Id: <20010304202349.051fbcf4.lehmann@ans-netz.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.61 (GTK+ 1.2.8; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE; i386) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, have anybody sucessvully installed openmail on his freeBSD box? i've tryed, because OpenMail needs very much dependencies... newer kernel and so on.... Olli To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 4 13:50:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from gate.lustig.com (lustig.ne.mediaone.net [24.91.125.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD9C437B71A for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 13:50:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barry@Lustig.COM) Received: (qmail 92762 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2001 21:50:27 -0000 Received: from gate.lustig.com (HELO Lustig.COM) (barry@205.246.2.242) by gate.lustig.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2001 21:50:27 -0000 Message-ID: <3AA2B8A1.7BE7858A@Lustig.COM> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 16:50:25 -0500 From: Barry Lustig Reply-To: barry@Lustig.COM Organization: Barry Lustig & Associates, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Fonvieille Cc: The Babbler , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking References: <3AA1B01B.9F2626D0@babbleon.org> <20010304110515.A862@vobiscum.styx.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:01:47PM -0500, The Babbler wrote: > > > > I'm trying to get networking going with vmware under FreeBSD. > > > > I was going to set up host-only networking and use NATD to get to the > > Great Wide World under vmware. This is kinda lucky since host-only is > > apparently the only sort of networking that vmware supports under > > FreeBSD. > > > [snip] > > > > PS: If nothing else I'm sure I can do the natd route, but I hate to do > > it if it's not really necessary. > > > [snip] > > I spent long time playing with vmware and network, and i never > managed to do networking, with the rest of the world, without using > natd. If someone could show me how to avoid natd, i'm interested too :) > > But i think the natd solution is very easy to deal with, so ... > The current version of vmware2 in /usr/ports gives the option of using netgraph bridging. Just install it with the bridging turned on and set host-only inside of vmware. You'll be able to use an IP address on the LAN you are attached to. No need for NAT'ting. barry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 4 14:17:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from karon.dynas.se (karon.dynas.se [192.71.43.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAB5337B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 14:17:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikko@dynas.se) Received: (qmail 73790 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2001 22:17:13 -0000 Received: from spirit.sto.dynas.se (HELO spirit.dynas.se) (172.16.1.10) by 172.16.1.1 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2001 22:17:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 17477 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2001 22:17:12 -0000 Received: from explorer.rsa.com (10.81.217.59) by spirit.dynas.se with SMTP; 4 Mar 2001 22:17:12 -0000 Received: (from mikko@localhost) by explorer.rsa.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f24MHAi74518; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 14:17:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikko) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 14:17:10 -0800 (PST) From: Mikko Tyolajarvi Message-Id: <200103042217.f24MHAi74518@explorer.rsa.com> To: bts@babbleon.org Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking Newsgroups: local.freebsd.emulation References: <3AA1B01B.9F2626D0@babbleon.org> X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.6 (NOV) Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In local.freebsd.emulation you write: >I'm trying to get networking going with vmware under FreeBSD. >I was going to set up host-only networking and use NATD to get to the >Great Wide World under vmware. This is kinda lucky since host-only is >apparently the only sort of networking that vmware supports under >FreeBSD. Last time I installed vmware, one had to have bridging support in the kernel, configure vmware for "host-only" networking, and then it Just Worked(tm) - full network access from vmware after giving the guest OS an IP address on the same subnet as the host OS. You can even use DHCP. The port has since been changed to use netgraph to do the bridging, which I assume should work without building a new kernel. So, it should work out-of-the box, without nat. Since the port mucks about with kernel modules, a virtual network interface and whatnot, you may want to reboot. $.02, /Mikko -- Mikko Työläjärvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com RSA Security To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 4 15:44:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from atlas.home.dynas.se (adsl-64-166-23-209.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.166.23.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235B337B71A for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 15:44:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikko@dynas.se) Received: (from mikko@localhost) by atlas.home.dynas.se (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f24NiTV01832; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 15:44:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikko) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 15:44:22 -0800 (PST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= X-Sender: mikko@dynas.se To: The Babbler Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking In-Reply-To: <3AA2C728.C38E2FD2@babbleon.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: mikko@dynas.se X-MIME-Autoconverted: to 8bit by snemail 0.35 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, The Babbler wrote: > Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote: > > > > In local.freebsd.emulation you write: > > > > >I'm trying to get networking going with vmware under FreeBSD. > > > > >I was going to set up host-only networking and use NATD to get to the > > >Great Wide World under vmware. This is kinda lucky since host-only is > > >apparently the only sort of networking that vmware supports under > > >FreeBSD. > > > > Last time I installed vmware, one had to have bridging support in the > > kernel, configure vmware for "host-only" networking, and then it Just > > Worked(tm) - full network access from vmware after giving the guest OS > > an IP address on the same subnet as the host OS. You can even use DHCP. > > > > The port has since been changed to use netgraph to do the bridging, > > which I assume should work without building a new kernel. So, it > > should work out-of-the box, without nat. > > Well, it doesn't. Any ideas on where to start? Ok, just for the hell of it, I ripped BRIDGE out of my kernel and deinstalled the vmware port (built new kernel, rebooted etc). Now I should be in the same position as you. 0. Verify vmware port version. I'm using /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2 (note the "2"). Makefile has PORTVERSION=2.0.3.799, PORTREVISION=1 If you are using the "emulators/vmware" port, you're on your own, sorry. 1. make install. I get a dialog asking whether I want to use netgraph bridging. Sure. Choose "yes". I get to enter network interface (happens to be "dc0" on this box). 2. Port installs and prints a message (actually it prints lots of other stuff too) about running ${PREFIX}/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh start 3. I run "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh start". I also run "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/rtc.sh start". This should be equivalent to what happens at boot. 4. ifconfig & netstat shows that I now have a "vmnet1" interface with address 192.168.0.1. I'm running a 192.168.250.0 net here - I wonder if there is a connection. Hmm.. nope. The address seems hardcoded and ends up in /usr/local/etc/vmware/config. I suppose strange thyings will happen if you are already using 192.168.0.0, but it should be easy enough to change. 5. Fire up vmware with a previously installed OS, configured for "host-only" networking. (testing with NetBSD, much quicker than NT). It comes up and believes it runs on my 192.168.250 net. 6. Let out a big sigh of relief. Works like a charm. That's it. Now all you have to do is to try to figure out where you deviate from this "golden path to success" :-) Good luck, /Mikko Mikko Työläjärvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com RSA Security To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 4 18:51:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.nc.rr.com (fe5.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9758337B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 18:51:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bts@babbleon.org) Received: from babbleon.org ([66.26.250.181]) by mail5.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Sun, 4 Mar 2001 17:52:35 -0500 Message-ID: <3AA2C728.C38E2FD2@babbleon.org> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:52:24 -0500 From: The Babbler Organization: None to speak of X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikko Tyolajarvi Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking References: <3AA1B01B.9F2626D0@babbleon.org> <200103042217.f24MHAi74518@explorer.rsa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote: > > In local.freebsd.emulation you write: > > >I'm trying to get networking going with vmware under FreeBSD. > > >I was going to set up host-only networking and use NATD to get to the > >Great Wide World under vmware. This is kinda lucky since host-only is > >apparently the only sort of networking that vmware supports under > >FreeBSD. > > Last time I installed vmware, one had to have bridging support in the > kernel, configure vmware for "host-only" networking, and then it Just > Worked(tm) - full network access from vmware after giving the guest OS > an IP address on the same subnet as the host OS. You can even use DHCP. > > The port has since been changed to use netgraph to do the bridging, > which I assume should work without building a new kernel. So, it > should work out-of-the box, without nat. Well, it doesn't. Any ideas on where to start? (The NAT solution is giving me trouble, too; my next step was to refer more closely to the way that I did the IP masquerading under Linux, but if I don't have to do it, that's even better . . .) And I don't recall an option to use netgraph when I installed; should it be there by default? Indeed, I just now went & deinstall/reinstall'ed the port, and I saw no option. And it doesn't "just work"; I've tried both the two-separate networks approach and the one-network approach and it fails. Also, when I tried to set up the separate natd stuff, if I set the interface to vmnet1 it doesn't work; if I set it to ep0, then I break my host-level network, which ain't quite what I wanted. Sorry if I seem especially clueless; I'm feeling pretty clueless right now. > > Since the port mucks about with kernel modules, a virtual network > interface and whatnot, you may want to reboot. > > $.02, > /Mikko > -- > Mikko Työläjärvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com > RSA Security -- "Brian, the man from babble-on" bts@babbleon.org Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 4 19:23:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.nc.rr.com (fe5.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC2037B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 19:23:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bts@babbleon.org) Received: from babbleon.org ([66.26.250.181]) by mail5.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Sun, 4 Mar 2001 22:23:08 -0500 Message-ID: <3AA30673.4FC7F9C5@babbleon.org> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 22:22:27 -0500 From: The Babbler Organization: None to speak of X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mikko@dynas.se Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thank you *very* much for going to the trouble to try this. I'm not sure what the results mean, but I tried to follow the same steps you did (roughly, anyway--I started composing this reply and doing them one by one, which precluded actually rebooting; if It acts differently after I reboot my host, I'll post an ammendment to this replay; otherwise, you can assume that it acted the same). Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, The Babbler wrote: > > > Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote: > > > > > > In local.freebsd.emulation you write: > > > > > > >I'm trying to get networking going with vmware under FreeBSD. > > > > > > >I was going to set up host-only networking and use NATD to get to the > > > >Great Wide World under vmware. This is kinda lucky since host-only is > > > >apparently the only sort of networking that vmware supports under > > > >FreeBSD. > > > > > > Last time I installed vmware, one had to have bridging support in the > > > kernel, configure vmware for "host-only" networking, and then it Just > > > Worked(tm) - full network access from vmware after giving the guest OS > > > an IP address on the same subnet as the host OS. You can even use DHCP. > > > > > > The port has since been changed to use netgraph to do the bridging, > > > which I assume should work without building a new kernel. So, it > > > should work out-of-the box, without nat. > > > > Well, it doesn't. Any ideas on where to start? > > Ok, just for the hell of it, I ripped BRIDGE out of my kernel and > deinstalled the vmware port (built new kernel, rebooted etc). Now I > should be in the same position as you. > > 0. Verify vmware port version. I'm using /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2 > (note the "2"). Makefile has PORTVERSION=2.0.3.799, PORTREVISION=1 > > If you are using the "emulators/vmware" port, you're on your own, > sorry. I'm using vmware2,, version 2.0.3.799. Check. > 1. make install. I get a dialog asking whether I want to use netgraph > bridging. Sure. Choose "yes". I get to enter network interface > (happens to be "dc0" on this box). Here's where my behavior differs from yours. I don't get such a dialog. I just did a deinstall/reinstall, and no such dialog. I tried it with both "deinstall / reinstall" and "deinstall / install." This is perhaps because I have netgraph already. Which perhaps I got whne I first installed vmware2; I can't remember. (I installed it a while ago, but I'm just now seriously trying to get it to work the way I need it to.) > 2. Port installs and prints a message (actually it prints lots > of other stuff too) about running ${PREFIX}/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh start Yes. > 3. I run "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh start". I also run > "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/rtc.sh start". This should be equivalent to > what happens at boot. Looks like it was already running . . . probably from before I did the deinstall/install. (It complains that the modules already exist.) > > 4. ifconfig & netstat shows that I now have a "vmnet1" interface with > address 192.168.0.1. I'm running a 192.168.250.0 net here - I > wonder if there is a connection. Hmm.. nope. The address seems > hardcoded and ends up in /usr/local/etc/vmware/config. I suppose > strange thyings will happen if you are already using 192.168.0.0, > but it should be easy enough to change. My vmnet1 is on 192.168.242.1. That's where I told it to go when I first installed vmware and it asked from the vm-config.sh (or whatever that startup shell script is). I can scarcely imagine that the IP address is the source of the difficulty, though. > > 5. Fire up vmware with a previously installed OS, configured for > "host-only" networking. (testing with NetBSD, much quicker than > NT). It comes up and believes it runs on my 192.168.250 net. Alas, the only guest I need to run is win98, but from there I can ping 192.168.242.2 (my virtual self), 192.168.242.1 (the host end of the vmnet1 interface), *and* 192.168.147.4 (the IP address of the physical ethernet card in my host), but *not* 192.168.147.1 (the IP address of the gateway machine to which the host is hooked) or 204.71.200.68 (www.yahoo.com, which happens to be my favorite site for random pings). This is with the guest configured to use 192.168.242.2 as its IP address and 192.168.241.1 as its gateway, but I've also tried it with other addresses . . . I tried DHCP startup, but that decided on address 169.254.147.50, which is totally goofy, and with it set like that, all addresses I've tried are unreachable. Which makes sense since nobody's prepared to talk to somebody at that address. I tried setting the virtual machine to be be at 192.168.147.99, so it would be *on* the 192.168.147 network, and setting the gateway to the "real" gateway (129.168.147.1), but, again, nothing works at all. On the other hand, I discovered (I think) why the NATD solution didn't work--despite what I thought I knew, my kernel wasn't built with firewall support. I'm going to try building a kernel with firewall support and bridging and see if I can then make it work like it was working under Linux. I probably need the more complex solution anyway, I suspect, becuase I run a *local* name server, and I wasn teh guest to use the host's name server, so I can't have straight pass-through--I've got to be able to address my host directly. > 6. Let out a big sigh of relief. Works like a charm. That sounds like fun! > That's it. Now all you have to do is to try to figure out where you > deviate from this "golden path to success" :-) > > Good luck, > /Mikko > > Mikko Työläjärvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com > RSA Security > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message -- "Brian, the man from babble-on" bts@babbleon.org Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Mar 5 8:30:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from fsmail.net (mail.fsmail.net [216.200.119.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B79B37B71A for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 08:29:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from micasino@fsmail.net) Received: (qmail 1998 invoked by uid 1120); 5 Mar 2001 16:05:36 -0000 Message-ID: <20010305160535.1997.qmail@fsmail.net> From: Ericka Rivera Subject: alianza estrategica To: ek5_76@yahoo.com Cc: Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 16:05:35 +0000 (GMT+00:00) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hola! Recientemente visite su sitio en internet y creo que talvez ud. se encuentre interesado en formar una alianza estrategica. Nuestra compañia es dueña y opera varios casinos en linea con todas las licencias. Tenemos mas de 30,000 clientes y 8,500 sitios asociados. La industria de juegos en linea es la mas explosiva en la red, con cerca de $10 billones proyectados para el para el ano 2002. Nos gustaria ofrecerle la siguiente propuesta: Quest Global Entretenimiento provee: * Casino / Casa de Apuestas, diseño completo (por ejemplo, vaya a http://www.freecasinofranchise.com/spanish/ ) *Todo los programas del juego, servicio al cliente, procesamiento de tarjetas de credito, y apollo logistico *Mas de 50% de ganancias netas del casino, (hechas en tiempo real). *Los Cheques de las ganancias seran enviados por correo cada viernes, llueva o truene!. Ud. nos dara: *Promocion del Casino, por medio de banners, correo electronico o ubicacion en los buscadores. Sin tomar ningun riesgo, ud llevara trafico a su casino personal en Internet, e inmediatamente aumentara los ingresos brutos de su compania. Lo invito a observar nuestro sitio corporativo en la siguiente direccion: http://www.freecasinofranchise.com/spanish/ Si ud. se enncuentra interesado, favor escribir a socio@getyourcasino.com. Esperamos llegar a saber de ud. muy pronto! Cordialmente Ericka Rivera Directora Latinoamerica socio@getyourcasino.com _______________________________________________________________________ FSmail - Get your free web-based email from Freeserve: www.fsmail.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Mar 5 10: 4: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from smarthost2.mail.easynet.fr (smarthost2.mail.easynet.fr [212.180.1.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802D837B719 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:04:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fonvi@easynet.fr) Received: from mx1.mail.easynet.fr (slb-1-sippriv.mail.easynet.fr [10.0.1.57]) by smarthost2.mail.easynet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39311BABF; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:03:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from vobiscum.styx.org (adsl-92-1-215.pops.easynet.fr [212.11.34.215]) by mx1.mail.easynet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D0FB6B4; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:03:58 +0100 (CET) Received: (from marc@localhost) by vobiscum.styx.org (8.11.1/8.9.3/ - 6/08/98) id f25I4Jd02053; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:04:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:04:19 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Matt of the Long Red Hair Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doscmd booting floppy on 4.1.1-STABLE Message-ID: <20010305190419.A1040@vobiscum.styx.org> References: <20010304111302.B862@vobiscum.styx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mattp@conundrum.com on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 07:04:32AM -0500 X-Useless-Header: Black Metal inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 07:04:32AM -0500, Matt of the Long Red Hair wrote: > On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > > I run doscmd with 3.5-S and 4.2-S without any problems, but i use floppy > > image instead of real floppy. > > I actually misspoke (mistyped?) myself.. the last cvsup I did, two days ago > now, was to 4.2-S.. still the same problem with an IBM DOS 5.0 floppy. I > tried to dd an image, and boot from that but there was no difference. > > What flavour of DOS are you using? > it was MS-DOS 6.22 Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Mar 5 19:17:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.nc.rr.com (fe5.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F20E37B74D for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:17:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bts@babbleon.org) Received: from babbleon.org ([66.26.250.181]) by mail5.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Mon, 5 Mar 2001 22:17:40 -0500 Message-ID: <3AA456C7.A00F0358@babbleon.org> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 22:17:27 -0500 From: The Babbler Organization: None to speak of X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mikko@dynas.se, Barry Lustig Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org As is frequently the case in such matters, the cause of my difficulty was very simple. I did not have the latest port. The verison matched, but the port *revision* did not match. With the truly latest port, it "just works," as suggested by so many kind correspondents. Thank you one and all. Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, The Babbler wrote: > > > Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote: > > > > > > In local.freebsd.emulation you write: > > > > > > >I'm trying to get networking going with vmware under FreeBSD. > > > > > > >I was going to set up host-only networking and use NATD to get to the > > > >Great Wide World under vmware. This is kinda lucky since host-only is > > > >apparently the only sort of networking that vmware supports under > > > >FreeBSD. > > > > > > Last time I installed vmware, one had to have bridging support in the > > > kernel, configure vmware for "host-only" networking, and then it Just > > > Worked(tm) - full network access from vmware after giving the guest OS > > > an IP address on the same subnet as the host OS. You can even use DHCP. > > > > > > The port has since been changed to use netgraph to do the bridging, > > > which I assume should work without building a new kernel. So, it > > > should work out-of-the box, without nat. > > > > Well, it doesn't. Any ideas on where to start? -- "Brian, the man from babble-on" bts@babbleon.org Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 7 7: 2:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from kiop.wiredmedia.co.uk (wiredmedia-2.dsl.easynet.co.uk [212.135.181.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D1B37B719 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 07:02:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: from tao.org.uk (postfix@genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.50] (may be forged)) by kiop.wiredmedia.co.uk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f27F9a395228 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 15:09:37 GMT (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id 7105E31D2; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 13:55:10 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 13:55:10 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser To: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: running multiple vmwares. Message-ID: <20010307135510.C13465@tao.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Has anyone managed to find a way of running multiple vmwares at the same time? Joe --ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqmPb0ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBav0QCfSM2nOxZ9c/2c48t+cllCLXqa W0UAoKqfUQkRHcdtugd5rsh5qa3eJ9Wj =JbWJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 7 18:50:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from quack.kfu.com (quack.kfu.com [205.178.90.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FAA37B72D for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 18:50:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from morpheus.kfu.com (morpheus.kfu.com [205.178.90.230]) by quack.kfu.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f282o9o73144 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 18:50:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com by morpheus.kfu.com with ESMTP (8.11.3//ident-1.0) id f282o9V27166; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 18:50:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3AA6F361.4030009@quack.kfu.com> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 18:50:09 -0800 From: Nick Sayer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010216 X-Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: XFree86 4.x server in a vmware guest Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Folks using FreeBSD in a vmware guest now can run XF86 4.x servers. See the new emulators/vmware-xf4mod port. Enjoy. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Mar 8 21:54: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail8.nc.rr.com (fe8.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F354037B718 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 21:54:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bts@babbleon.org) Received: from babbleon.org ([66.26.250.181]) by mail8.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Fri, 9 Mar 2001 00:51:23 -0500 Message-ID: <3AA86FE5.92256526@babbleon.org> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:53:41 -0500 From: The Babbler Organization: None to speak of X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mikko@dynas.se, Barry Lustig , emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking References: <3AA456C7.A00F0358@babbleon.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, this is frustrating in the exteme, but although it worked once, I can't get it to work any more. One thing I noticed is that the network reverted from 192.168.0.1 the *second* time but not the first, but I've tried reconfiguring my guest to talk to that network without luck. I'm hoping that somebody has some ideas . . . I've beat myhead against it for a few days before appealing to you folks again, but I'm befuddled again. I've even re-done the deinstall/reinstall, but that didn't fix anything. I can go back to the complex firewall-like solution, but I was having trouble with that one, too . . . and that one time I rebooted & installed it all just worked so easily. I just wish I recapture that victory. A couple new questions, though, while I'm at it (both minor): 1. Is there any way to get the RTC device turned off by default? If it's on, vmware eats up all available CPU but I don't see a way to keep it off-by-default. 2. Is there a way to get rid of the annoying requester claiming that /dev/psm0 can't be opened and thus full-screen mode will fail? In actual point of fact, full-screen mode works just peachy (for graphics; I read the warnings about text mode and haven't even tried that). The Babbler wrote: > > As is frequently the case in such matters, the cause of my difficulty > was very simple. > > I did not have the latest port. The verison matched, but the port > *revision* did not match. > > With the truly latest port, it "just works," as suggested by so many > kind correspondents. > > Thank you one and all. > > Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: > > > > On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, The Babbler wrote: > > > > > Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote: > > > > > > > > In local.freebsd.emulation you write: > > > > > > > > >I'm trying to get networking going with vmware under FreeBSD. > > > > > > > > >I was going to set up host-only networking and use NATD to get to the > > > > >Great Wide World under vmware. This is kinda lucky since host-only is > > > > >apparently the only sort of networking that vmware supports under > > > > >FreeBSD. > > > > > > > > Last time I installed vmware, one had to have bridging support in the > > > > kernel, configure vmware for "host-only" networking, and then it Just > > > > Worked(tm) - full network access from vmware after giving the guest OS > > > > an IP address on the same subnet as the host OS. You can even use DHCP. > > > > > > > > The port has since been changed to use netgraph to do the bridging, > > > > which I assume should work without building a new kernel. So, it > > > > should work out-of-the box, without nat. > > > > > > Well, it doesn't. Any ideas on where to start? > > -- > "Brian, the man from babble-on" bts@babbleon.org > Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org > Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. > Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com. -- "Brian, the man from babble-on" bts@babbleon.org Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 9 2:14:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5E837B719 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 02:14:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id 379CD317C; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 10:14:45 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 10:14:44 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser To: The Babbler Cc: mikko@dynas.se, Barry Lustig , emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking Message-ID: <20010309101444.D710@tao.org.uk> References: <3AA456C7.A00F0358@babbleon.org> <3AA86FE5.92256526@babbleon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AA86FE5.92256526@babbleon.org>; from bts@babbleon.org on Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:53:41AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:53:41AM -0500, The Babbler wrote: >=20 > 2. Is there a way to get rid of the annoying requester claiming that > /dev/psm0 can't be opened and thus full-screen mode will fail? In > actual point of fact, full-screen mode works just peachy (for graphics; > I read the warnings about text mode and haven't even tried that). >=20 Yeah this annoys me too. What on earth does reading the mouse have to do with full screen mode? ! Actually the error I get is along the lines: 'vmware can't understand what a /dev/sysmouse is so it won't do full screen mode!'. [It goes into full screen mode to test it's possible just before giving this error!] Joe --EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqorRQACgkQXVIcjOaxUBb3VACgwAQ4XN7baGDCMk8sZuKxelol /3MAn0NFyOSMrqQ9BYVB6jW61kG/yvPB =qgWU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 9 7:10:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from quack.kfu.com (quack.kfu.com [205.178.90.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4878537B71B for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 07:10:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@mailhost.kfu.com) Received: from morpheus.kfu.com (morpheus.kfu.com [205.178.90.230]) by quack.kfu.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f29FADo12709 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 07:10:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@mailhost.kfu.com) Received: by morpheus.kfu.com (8.11.3//ident-1.0) id f29FADi30516; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 07:10:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 07:10:13 -0800 (PST) From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com Message-Id: <200103091510.f29FADi30516@morpheus.kfu.com> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD VMware guest never idles Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Normally VMware tries to detect when the guest CPU is idle. In some OSes it is more successful than others. With a FreeBSD guest it fails rather miserably despite the fact that I have the apm driver enabled and apm_enable="YES" in rc.conf. Anyone have a fix for this? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 9 9:50:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from karon.dynas.se (karon.dynas.se [192.71.43.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 430FA37B718 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 09:50:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikko@dynas.se) Received: (qmail 37314 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2001 17:50:52 -0000 Received: from spirit.sto.dynas.se (HELO spirit.dynas.se) (172.16.1.10) by 172.16.1.1 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2001 17:50:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 11484 invoked by uid 1125); 9 Mar 2001 17:50:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 09:50:49 -0800 (PST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= X-X-Sender: To: The Babbler Cc: Barry Lustig , Subject: Re: vmware networking In-Reply-To: <3AA86FE5.92256526@babbleon.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: mikko@dynas.se X-MIME-Autoconverted: to 8bit by snemail 0.35 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, The Babbler wrote: > Well, this is frustrating in the exteme, but although it worked once, I > can't get it to work any more. One thing I noticed is that the network > reverted from 192.168.0.1 the *second* time but not the first, but I've > tried reconfiguring my guest to talk to that network without luck. Forget the 192.168.0.0 network, it is just part of the vmnet/bridge operation. Configure your guest OS to operate on the same network as your host OS. /Mikko Mikko Työläjärvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com RSA Security To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 9 12:51:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from columbus.rr.com (dhcp065-024-189-179.columbus.rr.com [65.24.189.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765FA37B719 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 12:51:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from caa@columbus.rr.com) Received: (from caa@localhost) by columbus.rr.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f29KpO470712; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:51:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from caa) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:51:14 -0500 From: Charles Anderson To: nsayer@quack.kfu.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD VMware guest never idles Message-ID: <20010309155114.C63383@midgard.dhs.org> References: <200103091510.f29FADi30516@morpheus.kfu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103091510.f29FADi30516@morpheus.kfu.com>; from nsayer@quack.kfu.com on Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 07:10:13AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Seems to work for be ok on a thinkpad 600X run NT 4.0 with a PRE_SMPNG guest. -Charlie On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 07:10:13AM -0800, nsayer@quack.kfu.com wrote: > Normally VMware tries to detect when the guest CPU is idle. In some OSes > it is more successful than others. With a FreeBSD guest it fails rather > miserably despite the fact that I have the apm driver enabled and > apm_enable="YES" in rc.conf. > > Anyone have a fix for this? > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message -- Charles Anderson caa@columbus.rr.com No quote, no nothin' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 9 13:53:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from phobos.talarian.com (mailhost.talarian.com [207.5.32.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C925F37B718 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:53:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com (beast.talarian.com [10.4.10.6] (may be forged)) by phobos.talarian.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA19272; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:53:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3AA950D2.5060108@quack.kfu.com> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 13:53:22 -0800 From: Nick Sayer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010216 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Anderson Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD VMware guest never idles References: <200103091510.f29FADi30516@morpheus.kfu.com> <20010309155114.C63383@midgard.dhs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Charles Anderson wrote: > Seems to work for be ok on a thinkpad 600X run NT 4.0 with a PRE_SMPNG > guest. Disconnecting the RTC fixed it. I wonder what the mechanism involved is. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 9 20: 0:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.nc.rr.com (fe5.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F39637B719 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 20:00:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bts@babbleon.org) Received: from babbleon.org ([66.26.250.181]) by mail5.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Fri, 9 Mar 2001 23:00:07 -0500 Message-ID: <3AA9A6B3.A4ACD8C0@babbleon.org> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 22:59:47 -0500 From: The Babbler Organization: None to speak of X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mikko@dynas.se Cc: Barry Lustig , emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Actually, whatever is going on, it's worse than what I saw before. I can't even ping to the other side of the *same* network. For example, if I leave vmnet1 at 192.168.0.1, and set the guest to 192.168.0.2, then pings in both directions fail. From the host, it fails with "host is down" rather than a simple failure to communicate. Does anybody know what this means? (I've also tried setting both sides to 192.168.242.x, where I used to be, as well as setting the guest as part of my "main" 192.168.147 network and using DHCP. I can't get any packets from vmware to anyplace at all.) Any advice would be greatly appreciated. > ping 192.168.0.2 PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, The Babbler wrote: > > > Well, this is frustrating in the exteme, but although it worked once, I > > can't get it to work any more. One thing I noticed is that the network > > reverted from 192.168.0.1 the *second* time but not the first, but I've > > tried reconfiguring my guest to talk to that network without luck. > > Forget the 192.168.0.0 network, it is just part of the vmnet/bridge > operation. Configure your guest OS to operate on the same network as > your host OS. > > /Mikko > > Mikko Työläjärvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com > RSA Security -- "Brian, the man from babble-on" bts@babbleon.org Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat Mar 10 15:58:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3E437B719 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:58:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2ANwCB93285 for freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:58:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:58:12 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200103102358.f2ANwCB93285@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports: 3 unbuildable ports: rtc-2000.09.22 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 3 ports which do not build properly on the FreeBSD package building cluster. Could you please visit http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org.html and correct the problems listed there? The individual ports with problems are rtc-2000.09.22. If you have already corrected the problems and submitted a PR, please accept my thanks and apologies for the delay in getting the fixes into the tree. This reminder is created automatically and does not (yet) have a way to know if a PR fixing the problem has been submitted. Please do *NOT* submit your response to me directly; I do not always have time to commit your fix; please instead submit a PR via 'send-pr' so it doesn't get lost. Please see http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/index.html for more information. Once you have a solution, use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -u" of the changes, as described in http://www.freebsd.org/porters-handbook/port-upgrading.html . These messages will continue to arrive twice a month until the fix is committed, as a reminder. Thanks, Bill "annoying port email" Fenner. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message