From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 0:43:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AF137B718; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 00:43:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2I8hcp38490; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:43:38 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:43:38 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Makoto MATSUSHITA Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, kjm@rins.ryukoku.ac.jp Subject: Re: Our strptime(3) doesn't conform to other standards/implementations Message-ID: <20010318114338.A38474@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20010318141913L.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20010318093752.A37335@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010318093752.A37335@nagual.pp.ru>; from ache@nagual.pp.ru on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 09:37:52AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 09:37:52 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 14:19:13 +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote: > > > Our strptime(3) implementation distinguishs '%A' and '%a', just like > > strftime(3) does. However, the Single UNIX Specification v2 doesn't > > > Upgrade your system. 'A' and 'a' are the same in -current strptime.c v1.22 > and in -stable too. Sorry, my mistake, the bug you report exist. Fix already commited in -current strptime.c v1.23 and not yet in -stable. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 0:59:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [212.154.129.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332B237B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 00:59:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bp@butya.kz) Received: by relay.butya.kz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 50984288DD; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:59:33 +0600 (ALMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.butya.kz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425F42878C; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:59:33 +0600 (ALMT) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:59:33 +0600 (ALMT) From: Boris Popov To: Tim Zingelman Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, tokky@fdns.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA + smbfs -> panic: malloc: wrong bucket In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tim Zingelman wrote: > I'm getting this repeatedly on several machines... after mounting a smbfs > then sitting idle for a while, just an ls -l on the fs causes the panic. Good. Hope this happens with 1.3.6. If not - please upgrade. Check also if kernel and smbfs module built against the same source tree (eg, if you upgrade kernel, smbfs module should be also rebuilded). > I just built linux.ko with -g and tried to add-symbol-file it, but it made > no difference... I'll install the new linux.ko in case that makes a > difference, but it will probably be at least an hour before I get another > crash... There is probably a how-to on debugging KLDs in the handbook (At least I'm remember DES wrote it). -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 1:50:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from quack.kfu.com (quack.kfu.com [205.178.90.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52BC37B71E for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 01:50:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@medusa.kfu.com) Received: from medusa.kfu.com (medusa.kfu.com [205.178.90.222]) by quack.kfu.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2I9oGh32708 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 01:50:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@medusa.kfu.com) Received: (from nsayer@localhost) by medusa.kfu.com (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f2I9oGh64987 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 01:50:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 01:50:16 -0800 (PST) From: Nick Sayer Message-Id: <200103180950.f2I9oGh64987@medusa.kfu.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: telnet crashes disabling SRA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This problem is related to a crash fixed a while ago relating to the -X command line parameter. It is now fixed in -current. I mistakenly committed a slightly screwed up version to RELENG_4 before asking Jordan. I hope to get it straightened out ASAP. But if anyone is desperate, they can grab v1.6 of src/sys/crypto/telnet/libtelnet/auth.c. There should be no difference between the HEAD and RELENG_4 versions (there is right now, but that's going to hopefully be fixed). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 2:44:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shark.harmonic.co.il (jupiter.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8EB37B719 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 02:44:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roman@harmonic.co.il) Received: from localhost (roman@localhost) by shark.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA24185 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:44:38 +0200 Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:44:38 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ARCH in /etc/make.conf Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I've noticed that for K6-2 -march=k6 is implied. Browsing through gcc code teaches me that ``k6 - doesn't have pipelines'' which is wrong for sure for K6-2. That may explain why -march=pentium binaries (played with graphics/xine port) run faster than -march=k6. Perhaps it's wiser to set -march=pentium for K6-2 (of course, with 3DNOW - I haven't seen yet what variables are set for benefit of ports like mpg123) --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 3:37:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from numeri.campus.luth.se (numeri.campus.luth.se [130.240.197.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607D237B719 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 03:37:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from k@numeri.campus.luth.se) Received: from numeri.campus.luth.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numeri.campus.luth.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2IBblD44515; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:37:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from k@numeri.campus.luth.se) Message-Id: <200103181137.f2IBblD44515@numeri.campus.luth.se> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Phil Reynolds Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NatSemi network cards In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 17 Mar 2001 23:53:22 GMT." <20010317235322.A4991@tinsleyviaduct.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:37:47 +0100 From: Johan Karlsson Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Sat, 17 Mar 2001 23:53:22 GMT, Phil Reynolds wrote: > the FA311 which is a National Semiconductor compatible (natsemi module > in Linux 2.4). > > I have not been able to find any reference to this card in any compatibility > documentation for FreeBSD. Is it supported by 4.2, and if not, will 4.3 > support it? As Mike told you it is supported by sis(4). However I recomend you wait for 4.3 since this commit has been done between 4.2 and now: ------ Revision 1.13.4.7 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Wed Feb 21 22:17:51 2001 UTC (3 weeks, 3 days ago) by wpaul Branch: RELENG_4 Changes since 1.13.4.6: +12 -2 lines Diff to previous 1.13.4.6 (colored) to branchpoint 1.13 (colored) next main 1.14 (colored) MFC: fix for DP83815 chips (Netgear FA311/FA312 cards) to disable PME mode to avoid problems on some motherboards ------ This commit fixed my problems :-) /Johan K To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 6:29:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns5.pacific.net.au (ns5.pacific.net.au [203.143.252.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A825337B719 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 06:29:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mckay@thehub.com.au) Received: from dungeon.home (ppp185.dyn249.pacific.net.au [203.143.249.185]) by ns5.pacific.net.au (8.9.0/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA05746 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 01:29:10 +1100 (EST) Received: from dungeon.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dungeon.home (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2IETWu05880; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:29:32 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from mckay) Message-Id: <200103181429.f2IETWu05880@dungeon.home> To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: mckay@thehub.com.au Subject: Re: Problem with 4.2-STABLE and dc0 References: <16DC0F334516F5478EC60CADEDB6A68410D9C6@moe.wojo.net> <5.0.2.1.0.20010312122304.02ad89a8@pop.schulte.org> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010312122304.02ad89a8@pop.schulte.org> from Christopher Schulte at "Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:31:07 +0000" Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:29:32 +1000 From: Stephen McKay Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday, 12th March 2001, Christopher Schulte wrote: >Linksys LNE100-TX here also. I've been running 4.3-BETA for about 2 weeks, >with a few make worlds to date. My system exhibits the same behavior, aka >tail of dmesg output right after reboot: > >...normal boot messages... >Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a >dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state >dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state >dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state > >The message only appears when the system is rebooted; the box runs just >fine and I don't see any more of that error until it's rebooted. I have >not noticed any network related problems with dc[x] interfaces. This is my fault, sort of. The long explanation follows: A real Intel 21143 requires both the transmitter and the receiver to be idle when changing certain things (selecting full or half duplex, for example). In dc_setcfg() the driver disables both the transmitter and the receiver so it can set a few flags, but, in earlier versions, only checked to see if *either* of them actually went idle. I fixed that bug, and most of the clone chips seem to implement this stuff properly. But the PNIC doesn't do this right. Or perhaps we are giving it grief some other way and it's bellyaching at an unfortunate time. It's hard to tell because the PNIC docs are a bit thin, and I don't have a PNIC to play with. Regardless, the old code works on the PNIC. Maybe the PNIC doesn't need to idle the transmitter to change these modes. Clone makers don't have to implement all the limitations of the original, after all. Now, if any of you are still reading :-) perhaps you'd like to try this patch. This should stop the "failed to force tx and rx to idle" message but will introduce a debugging message that would be helpful for me to see. I'd like anyone who is testing for the 4.3 release, who uses any of the cards supported by the dc driver, and who has a bit of spare time, to try this patch, and send me the results. When you get bored with the diag output, just delete the obvious printf. Stephen. --- if_dc.c.orig Tue Mar 6 22:41:17 2001 +++ if_dc.c Sun Mar 18 20:16:30 2001 @@ -1204,11 +1204,12 @@ for (i = 0; i < DC_TIMEOUT; i++) { isr = CSR_READ_4(sc, DC_ISR); - if (isr & DC_ISR_TX_IDLE && + if ((isr & DC_ISR_TX_IDLE || DC_IS_PNIC(sc)) && (isr & DC_ISR_RX_STATE) == DC_RXSTATE_STOPPED) break; DELAY(10); } + printf("dc%d: i=%d isr=0x%x\n", sc->dc_unit, i, isr); if (i == DC_TIMEOUT) printf("dc%d: failed to force tx and " To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 6:48:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from titian.jeol.com (titian.jeol.com [192.160.103.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B3D37B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 06:48:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lambert@jeol.com) Received: from titian.jeol.com (titian.jeol.com [192.160.103.2]) by titian.jeol.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA332715 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 09:48:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 09:48:55 -0500 From: Mike Lambert To: Subject: Re: KDE2.1 + Pthread errors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Colin Legendre wrote: > I am getting errors with pthread while doing a make install for kde2.1.... There are a number of posts to "freebsd-ports" regarding this issue, particularly when attempting to build KDE 2.1 against XFree86 4.0.2. The package maintainer is well aware of the problem and is working on a solution. The current solution is to install XFree86 4.0.1 first, then build Qt 2.2.4, and finally KDE 2.1. I recommend following "freebsd-ports" for up to date information. Regards, Mike Lambert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 7:11:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from updraft.jp.freebsd.org (updraft.jp.FreeBSD.ORG [210.157.158.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6091637B719; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 07:11:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by updraft.jp.freebsd.org (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id f2IFBGW55764; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:11:18 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, kjm@rins.ryukoku.ac.jp In-Reply-To: <20010318114338.A38474@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20010318141913L.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20010318093752.A37335@nagual.pp.ru> <20010318114338.A38474@nagual.pp.ru> X-Face: '*aj"d@ijeQ:/X}]oM5c5Uz{ZZZk90WPt>a^y4$cGQp8:!H\W=hSM;PuNiidkc]/%,;6VGu e+`&APmz|P;F~OL/QK%;P2vU>\j4X.8@i%j6[%DTs_3J,Fff0)*oHg$A.cDm&jc#pD24WK@{,"Ef!0 P\):.2}8jo-BiZ?X&t$V X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.2 (Poseidon) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 11 From: Makoto MATSUSHITA To: ache@nagual.pp.ru Subject: Re: Our strptime(3) doesn't conform to other standards/implementations Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:10:55 +0900 Message-Id: <20010319001055W.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ache> Fix already commited in -current strptime.c v1.23 and not yet in ache> -stable. Very glad to hear that, thank you. We are in a freeze stage, but are there any chances to merge this into 4-stable... ah, maybe I'm dreamin' :-) -- - Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 7:32:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from quack.kfu.com (quack.kfu.com [205.178.90.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9462137B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 07:32:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from medusa.kfu.com (medusa.kfu.com [205.178.90.222]) by quack.kfu.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2IFWXh34115; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 07:32:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com (icarus.kfu.com [205.178.90.254]) by medusa.kfu.com (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f2IFWWY67399; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 07:32:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Message-ID: <3AB4D50F.1060704@quack.kfu.com> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 07:32:31 -0800 From: Nick Sayer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010216 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Emmerton Cc: Juha Saarinen , Matt of the Long Red Hair , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What about SRP auth for telnet and ftp? [was Re: SRA auth ] References: <006e01c0af4b$b0f6dbb0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Emmerton wrote: >> Oh I see... it's the Secure RPC Authentication thingy. >> ftp://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/netutils/sra/sra.README > > > I've been working with Stanford's SRP stuff lately, and have had the passing > thought of adding support for it to the stock ftp and telnet daemons that > FreeBSD ships with. (Mainly because I was quite annoyed at the number of > things I had to fix with the telnetd that ships with the SRP distribution.) > > You can read more about SRP at http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~tjw/srp, > or in RFC 2945. > > Would anyone be interested in seeing SRP functionality added? I was considering doing this after the dust settled from the SRA import. At the time I realized that SRA was quite dated. It's not insecure per se (considering the alternative is plaintext), but the size of the constants in the DH are quite small and there is no mechanism for negotiating alternatives. In any event the weak link would end up being the fact that DES is what's actually used to exchange the authentication data. The only way to fix these flaws would be to break interoperability with existing SRA implementations. SSH already existed by then, but was not in the tree. My motivation was that if someone did a remote installation of some sort, their first post-install contact would have to be in plaintext -- someone sniffing could watch them log in, su to root, add an ssh package and log out. After that sessions would be protected, but the root password would have already been exposed once. SRA at least would require the sniffer to run a DES crack on the captured session. But then openssh was imported and the wind sort of left my sails. With ssh FreeBSD has a much more secure remote access facility installed by default. The only possible reason to revisit telnet would be if it was desired for interoperability. So far as I know no other distribution of *nix ships with SRP functionality, so that argument doesn't hold much water. But I suppose we could buck the trend of abandoning telnet in favor of ssh. The nice thing about patching telnet to add authentication types is that the actual patching is fairly limited -- the code just sort of lays alongside the rest in libtelnet. But if you're going to bother, the first thing you should do is add some better session encryption. All that's available right now are variations of single DES. The same variations of triple DES should be added and probably prefered. I once added support for using IDEA as an encryption type before I found out about the patent issues. In theory I could dig up those patches as an illustrative aid for adding additional enc types if it's not already fairly obvious how one does it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 7:40:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fat.ti.ru (fat.ti.ru [212.1.224.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEAD37B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 07:40:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Martin@McFlySr.Kurgan.Ru) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (fat.ti.ru [212.1.224.35]) by fat.ti.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF939D944 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 18:40:10 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 18:40:10 +0300 From: Martin McFlySr X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) Personal Reply-To: Martin McFlySr Organization: Back To The Future X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <8373951066.20010318184010@McFlySr.Kurgan.Ru> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make world In-reply-To: <20010318081642.A5067@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> References: <20010318081642.A5067@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello Robert Tan T.G., Sunday, 18 March 2001, 10:16:42, you wrote: RTTG> Im having problems rebuilding my system after a successfull cvsup. .... -->> RTTG> Error: your port uses an old layout. Please update it to match this RTTG> bsd.port.mk. If you have updated your ports collection via cvsup and RTTG> are still getting this error, see Q12 and Q13 in the cvsup FAQ on RTTG> http://www.polstra.com for further information. RTTG> *** Error code 1 You are can fix this: $ rm -fr /usr/ports $ cvsup ports-supfile or: $ find /usr/ports/ -name patches -type d -exec rm -rf {} \; $ find /usr/ports/ -name pkg -type d -exec rm -rf {} \; $ find /usr/ports/ -name md5 -type f -exec rm -f {} \; $ cvsup ports-supfile (c) FAQ of Fido7.Ru.Unix.Bsd -- Sunday, 18 March 2001, 18:36 Best regards from future, Martin McFlySr, HillDale. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 8:13: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291E937B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 08:12:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id IAA04406; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 08:12:43 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda04404; Sun Mar 18 08:12:27 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f2IGCLC15576; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 08:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdQ13555; Sun Mar 18 08:11:43 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.3/8.9.1) id f2IGBf894065; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 08:11:41 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103181611.f2IGBf894065@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdx93896; Sun Mar 18 08:11:12 2001 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-Sender: schubert To: Matt Dillon Cc: Jonathan Lemon , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Not only ftpd's problem with ls */../*..... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 17 Mar 2001 21:43:37 PST." <200103180543.f2I5hb398084@earth.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 08:11:12 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200103180543.f2I5hb398084@earth.backplane.com>, Matt Dillon writes: > > :> be set with a new api call, setgloblimit()? Or perhaps even just > :> have the setgloblimit() API call and don't even bother with a new flag > . > : > :I would think a better idea is to have the system default to a hard > :limit, and then allow those programs that know better to override it. > :This way, we catch most naive uses of glob, while allowing those users > :who actually want to iterate over more paths to continue. You'll also > :note that the glob interface explicitly allows continuing from a previous > :match (which is what gl_pathc is for), so this fits in nicely. The > :only additional change I can think of is to add a new error return to > :explicitly alert the user that the match limit was hit. > : > :Doing it this way also negates the need for a setgloblimit. > > Imposing a limit by default is no better then having the hard limit as > a default in the first place. The goal of this fix should be to be as > non-intrusive as possible. Having a hard limit by default is extremely > intrusive. It would be almost as bad as putting a hard limit in, say, > 'find'. You don't know *what* type of program will be using the > interface. Just because someone can D.O.S. ftpd doesn't mean that > you should suddenly impose an arbitrary limit on every single program > that might use the interface. Nor would it be appropriate to impose an > additional burden on the programmers using the interface to require them > to explicitly turn off the hard limit if they don't want it... that is > a terrible default API for something like glob! It immediately imposes > the arbitrary limit on every single program using the interface... a limi > t > that the programmers using the interface probably assume doesn't exist. > > It makes to try to protect programmers from themselves a little, but > it doesn't make sense to pollute the functionality and scaleability of > the default interfaces to reach that end. We shouldn't be trying to > protect idiots from themselves... let them learn the hard way so the > rest of us can use these APIs without having to go through loops with > flags and options to make them act the way we want them to act. It's not about protecting idiot programmers from themselves. It's about protecting naive users from idiot programmers. Enough on this philosophical tangent. Having said that, any malicious user could easily circumvent the patch by using their own glob() functions or starve the system of resources in some other way. I think that the ultimate solution is to impose limits on users via login.conf. I tried the exploit on an ftpd that was limited by login.conf. The system didn't crash, slow down, or even use more than a small amount of swap. Ftpd produced a simple message that it could not complete the requested action. I agree with you that the patch to glob() is not appropriate to stop this kind of DoS. Rather than resolving the cause of the problem, resource starvation, we are attacking the effect. I think that our options are: 1. Have ftpd impose limits on its own resource utilisation regardless of the resource limits imposed in login.conf. How many resources would an FTP daemon need anyway? I think this is a proactive solution. 2. A short term fix would be to limit ftpd in inetd.conf using limits(1). 3. Implement reasonable default limits in login.conf. These limits could even be determined at sysinstall time by querying the system about memory and swap sizes. 3a. #3 above but instead of sysinstall determining the limits define classes of users in login.conf such as default (with reasonable limits for most installations) and big (without limits). A simple solution for a simple problem. I think that the above points protect naive users from idiot programmers while while addressing Matt's concerns. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 8:17:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chmod.ath.cx (CC2-1242.charter-stl.com [24.217.116.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75AD37B719; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 08:17:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx) Received: by chmod.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 129B7A90E; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:16:48 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:16:47 -0600 From: Andrew Hesford To: FreeBSD-stable , FreeBSD-questions Subject: burncd troubles Message-ID: <20010318101647.A60469@cec.wustl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Loop: Andrew Hesford Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I am trying to create an audio CD using burncd. The command I have entered is such: burncd -f /dev/acd0c audio alien_ant_farm-movies.cdr crystal_method-busy_child.cdr downer-last_time.cdr jimi_hendrix-voodoo_chile_slight_return.cdr radiohead-blow_out_live.cdr radiohead-palo_alto.cdr radiohead-punchdrunk_lovesick_singalong.cdr rage_against_the_machine-kill_a_man.cdr rage_against_the_machine-killing_in_the_name_of.cdr rage_against_the_machine-renegades_of_funk.cdr soul_coughing-super_bon_bon.cdr tool-no_quarter.cdr fixate I get the following error for each audio file: next writeable LBA 0 writing from file crystal_method-busy_child.cdr size 76619 KB only wrote -1 of 37632 bytes The files are CD-R audio format, as converted by sox from WAV files. According to dmesg, my CD-RW drive is an "LG CD-RW CED-8080B". My dmesg is flooded with the following message: acd0: WRITE_BIG - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=64 ascq=00 error=00 Any hints on what the problem is and how to fix it? Thanks. -- Andrew Hesford ajh3@chmod.ath.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 8:32:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mout01.kundenserver.de (mout01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52BB37B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 08:32:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from raimar@puretec.de) Received: from [195.20.224.148] (helo=mxintern.kundenserver.de) by mout01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 14eg6Q-0006Ir-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:32:22 +0100 Received: from [172.17.0.66] (helo=raimar.schlund.de) by mxintern.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #3) id 14eg6P-0005Yh-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:32:22 +0100 Received: by raimar.schlund.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0E2CC7199; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:32:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:32:20 +0100 From: Raimar Lutsch To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burncd troubles Message-ID: <20010318173220.A28008@raimar.schlund.de> References: <20010318101647.A60469@cec.wustl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010318101647.A60469@cec.wustl.edu>; from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:16:47AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mar 18, 2001, Andrew Hesford wrote: > Hello, I am trying to create an audio CD using burncd. The command I > have entered is such: > > next writeable LBA 0 > writing from file crystal_method-busy_child.cdr size 76619 KB > > only wrote -1 of 37632 bytes I solved this problem by adding a '-s 2'-switch to the commandline for my old Mitsumi 2xCDR. -- Raimar Lutsch I confuse myself just fine, thank you. Don't need help. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 9:47: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f252.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.20.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE11C37B719; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 09:46:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jefffbsd@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 09:46:59 -0800 Received: from 161.184.39.167 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:46:57 GMT X-Originating-IP: [161.184.39.167] From: "Jeffrey Sewell" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Jailed Apache/Bind/sshd Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:46:57 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2001 17:46:59.0066 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E58FDA0:01C0AFD3] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG For each IP do you need a separate Jail and daemon running? Or can you have one jail on lets say ip; 204.31.19.1 and bind the rest '204.31.19.2..thru 254' with the one Jail? Thank-You, Jeff _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 9:55: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from agena.meridian-enviro.com (thunder.meridian-enviro.com [207.109.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4973637B719; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 09:54:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Received: from localhost.meridian-enviro.com (kfarms.meridian-enviro.com [10.10.10.20]) by agena.meridian-enviro.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2IHspQ35163; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:54:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:54:48 -0600 Message-ID: <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> From: rand@meridian-enviro.com To: Mike Smith Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Tancsa , bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-Reply-To: <200103180652.f2I6qSU06228@mass.dis.org> References: <87hf0r60us.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <200103180652.f2I6qSU06228@mass.dis.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: $L%T~#'9fAQ])o]A][d7EH`V;"_;2K;TEPQB=v]rDf_2s% Well, I just inserted just over 2 million rows and it hung again: Mike> Ok; I'm only up to 7.5M rows. The fact that you got so far so Mike> quickly makes me wonder whether I'm doing something wrong. Mike> This is what I did: Mike> - Built a 4-disk RAID10 array and mounted it on /var/db/mysql Mike> - Installed 3.23.33 client and server Mike> - Changed 'fortune -l' to 'fortune -s' in your script Mike> - Created a test database with 'create database twe_test;' Mike> - Pointed the script at the database with 'test.pl | mysql -u root twe_test' Mike> If you have a better cookbook, I'm all ears. Ours is essentially identical. Here are a few more details: o We built a 4 disk RAID10 array, and the 4 IBM 75GB DTLA of the array are the only disks in the system. We laid out filesystems with /var/db/mysql being the largest. The only mildly strang thing about the layout is putting 2 FreeBSD slices on the disk so we can have enough partitions. We also enabled softupdates on all the filesystems. Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/twed0s1a 248M 56M 173M 24% / /dev/twed0s1g 12G 4.8G 6.1G 44% /tmp /dev/twed0s1e 2.9G 521M 2.2G 19% /usr /dev/twed0s2e 3.9G 18K 3.6G 0% /usr/weather /dev/twed0s1f 496M 779K 456M 0% /var /dev/twed0s2f 12G 2.0K 11G 0% /project/Birdland /dev/twed0s2g 104G 26G 70G 27% /var/db/mysql Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Type /dev/twed0s1b 4194176 0 4194176 0% Interleaved When we bound the array this last time, we took all the defaults: A 64KB stripe size, disk write cache enabled. It takes a surprisingly long time to initialize the array. What I did is to boot off the 4.3 floppies (no cdrom in this system) and go to the slice (a.k.a. DOS partition) editor and write out the slice information. This 'write' seems to cause the twe0 driver to initialize the array, and then I go home to bed. When I wake up it is done, and then I usually just reboot and restart the installation. o Installed MySQL via packages: mysql-server-3.23.33, which installs mysql-client-3.23.33. We've run it both with and without our my.cnf configuration. o Our MySQL server is somewhat customized, but for a stock MySQL server test we reduce $step from 1000 to 100 and you won't exceed MySQL's max_allowed_packet. Using a short fortune should also keep the packet sizes small enough. o We created our test database with 'create database dkr;'. o And we kill our system with the command: ./birdland.pl | mysql -hlocalhost -uroot -psecret dkr Doug> I think I'll turn off softupdates and also run MySQL in a stock Doug> configuration, just to make sure it'll still break. This time we didn't even reach 600,000 rows before it broke. Softupdates turned off, and no my.cnf in /var/db/mysql. Mike, thanks for all your help and the time you've invested in this! What we can do to assist? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 10:13:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863F237B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:13:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2IICtg70268; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 13:12:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010318131114.017ec9f0@marble.sentex.net> X-Sender: mdtancsa@marble.sentex.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 13:12:54 -0500 To: rand@meridian-enviro.com From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: 3ware problems Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, bryanh@meridian-enviro.com In-Reply-To: <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> References: <200103180652.f2I6qSU06228@mass.dis.org> <87hf0r60us.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <200103180652.f2I6qSU06228@mass.dis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:54 AM 3/18/2001 -0600, rand@meridian-enviro.com wrote: > When we bound the array this last time, we took all the defaults: A > 64KB stripe size, disk write cache enabled. It takes a surprisingly > long time to initialize the array. What I did is to boot off the > 4.3 floppies (no cdrom in this system) and go to the slice > (a.k.a. DOS partition) editor and write out the slice > information. This 'write' seems to cause the twe0 driver to > initialize the array, and then I go home to bed. When I wake up it > is done, and then I usually just reboot and restart the > installation. The delay is normal. When you setup anything other than a RAID0 array, the card is actually doing work to your drives in the background. Grab the array manager from http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID/3ware/3dm-bsd.1.09.00.002.tar.gz and it will notify you when its done. You can also speed up the initialization part a bit by setting it to a faster rebuild time. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administration, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 10:46:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from khan.acc.umu.se (khan.acc.umu.se [130.239.18.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3436A37B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:46:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from markush@acc.umu.se) Received: from mao.acc.umu.se (root@mao.acc.umu.se [130.239.18.154]) by khan.acc.umu.se (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2IIkdS19996; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 19:46:39 +0100 (MET) Received: (from markush@localhost) by mao.acc.umu.se (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id TAA12328; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 19:46:38 +0100 Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 19:46:38 +0100 From: Markus Holmberg To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Eric M Logan , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: ports vs. packages... Message-ID: <20010318194637.A10260@acc.umu.se> References: <3AB3C1C2.67E1AB9B@yahoo.com> <20010317125349.E22316@mollari.cthul.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3-current-20000511i In-Reply-To: <20010317125349.E22316@mollari.cthul.hu>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:53:49PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Isn't there a small security advantage with building from source (compared to downloading packages from an untrusted party)? With source one can be assured that the port is built from unmodified data since the downloaded distfiles are checked with checksums. (Assuming the local ports tree can be trusted) As opposed to packages where there is no verification at all that you didn't receive something manipulated. (The possibility of someone setting up a FreeBSD mirror distributing trojaned packages disturbs me) I'm not sure if I overlooked something though.. Regards, Markus. On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:53:49PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 11:57:54AM -0800, Eric M Logan wrote: > > Can anyone tell me if there's any advantage(s) to installing > > applications from the ports collection as opposed to just using the > > available packages. This is of course, aside from the ability to > > manipulate a variable or two or when there are no precompiled binaries > > available. It just seems to me that using packages is so much quicker > > and more convenient. Would compiling from the ports collection > > implement some enhancements for your particular processor for instance? > > Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. > > There are three main benefits I can think of: > > * You get to choose your compiler settings. This includes things like > -march=<...> to optimize for your processor (e.g. check out the > CPUTYPE setting in /etc/defaults/make.conf on 4.3) > > * There is always a lag of about 2 days between when a port is > available and when the package is rebuilt from it. This may be > relevant for updates you really want/need, like security or bugfix > updates. > > * You have finer control over build knobs, e.g. some ports adapt > themselves to what other stuff you have installed on the system > (GNOME, esound, etc) and will configure themselves to use it. There > are lots of "manual" knobs for enabling/disabling features too. > > Kris -- Markus Holmberg | Give me Unix or give me a typewriter. markush@acc.umu.se | http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 10:50:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from agena.meridian-enviro.com (thunder.meridian-enviro.com [207.109.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472EF37B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:50:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Received: from localhost.meridian-enviro.com (kfarms.meridian-enviro.com [10.10.10.20]) by agena.meridian-enviro.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2IIodQ41545; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:50:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:50:36 -0600 Message-ID: <87elvu6hdv.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> From: rand@meridian-enviro.com To: Mike Tancsa Cc: rand@meridian-enviro.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20010318131114.017ec9f0@marble.sentex.net> References: <200103180652.f2I6qSU06228@mass.dis.org> <87hf0r60us.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <4.2.2.20010318131114.017ec9f0@marble.sentex.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: $L%T~#'9fAQ])o]A][d7EH`V;"_;2K;TEPQB=v]rDf_2s% It takes a surprisingly long time to initialize the array. Mike> The delay is normal. When you setup anything other than a RAID0 Mike> array, the card is actually doing work to your drives in the Mike> background. Grab the array manager from Mike> http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID/3ware/3dm-bsd.1.09.00.002.tar.gz Mike> and it will notify you when its done. You can also speed up the Mike> initialization part a bit by setting it to a faster rebuild Mike> time. We finally did figure that out. The problem in this particular cirmstance with the 3dm utility is that the only controller in the box is the 3ware 6400. So inorder to run 3dm I need to have FreeBSD installed, and installing FreeBSD at the same time the controller is initializing the array, is really slow. :) The first time I did this I thought something was broken when I watched the newfs output those duplicate super block locations. It was about 10 seconds between each block! After a search of the FreeBSD lists I found a reference to initializing the array, and just waited. On ttyv1 the kernel issues a message when the array initialization is done, so I usually just wait for that. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 10:56:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F7237B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:56:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Received: from cfcl.com (cpe-24-221-169-54.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.169.54]) by idiom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27998 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:56:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.168.205] (cerberus [192.168.168.205]) by cfcl.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2IIvaV30732 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:57:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010318194637.A10260@acc.umu.se> References: <3AB3C1C2.67E1AB9B@yahoo.com> <20010317125349.E22316@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010318194637.A10260@acc.umu.se> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:47:17 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Rich Morin Subject: Re: ports vs. packages... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 7:46 PM +0100 3/18/01, Markus Holmberg wrote: >Isn't there a small security advantage with building from source >(compared to downloading packages from an untrusted party)? Access to the source code (and even a close examination of it) isn't enough. See Ken Thompson's Turing Award lecture, "Reflections on Trusting Trust": http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - home page, resume, etc. http://www.cfcl.com/Meta/md_fb.html - The FreeBSD Browser email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 11: 0:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rmx325-mta.mail.com (rmx325-mta.mail.com [165.251.48.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF1E37B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:00:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdorens73@mail.com) Received: from web394-mc (web394-mc.mail.com [165.251.48.135]) by rmx325-mta.mail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA17663 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:00:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <386919470.984942019520.JavaMail.root@web394-mc> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:00:19 -0500 (EST) From: Dorens Jay To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: mail.com X-Originating-IP: 208.37.232.43 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just upgraded to 4.3-BETA from 4.2-STABLE. Now I find I cannot su to root f= rom a console window in X (XFree86-3.3.6 with Gnome/Sawfish). Even if I en= ter the correct password, the su login gets rejected (and yes, user is memb= er of wheel group). However, in a plain console (not in X), I CAN su to ro= ot as a regular user. Prior to upgrading to 4.3-BETA (kernel + userland), = I was able to su to root in X in 4.2-STABLE. =20 I tried putting `secure=B4 after the ttyp entries in /etc/ttys but that did= n=B4t help. On a separate box using 4.2-STABLE I upgraded only the kernel t= o 4.3-BETA (same 4.2-STABLE userland), and the problem still occurred - cou= ldn=B4t su to root in X. Is the problem in the kernel? =20 How do I fix this? Is there a kernel option that needs to be activated? Tha= nks in advance. ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=3Dsignup To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 11: 5:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rmx308-mta.mail.com (rmx308-mta.mail.com [165.251.48.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C094637B71B for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:05:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdorens73@mail.com) Received: from web349-mc (web349-mc.mail.com [165.251.48.91]) by rmx308-mta.mail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA03746 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:05:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <381827745.984942348922.JavaMail.root@web349-mc> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:05:48 -0500 (EST) From: Dorens Jay To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Can't su to root in X in 4.3-BETA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: mail.com X-Originating-IP: 216.50.61.168 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just upgraded to 4.3-BETA from 4.2-STABLE. Now I find I cannot su to root f= rom a console window in X (XFree86-3.3.6 with Gnome/Sawfish). Even if I en= ter the correct password, the su login gets rejected (and yes, user is memb= er of wheel group). However, in a plain console (not in X), I CAN su to ro= ot as a regular user. Prior to upgrading to 4.3-BETA (kernel + userland), = I was able to su to root in X in 4.2-STABLE. =20 I tried putting `secure=B4 after the ttyp entries in /etc/ttys but that did= n=B4t help. On a separate box using 4.2-STABLE I upgraded only the kernel t= o 4.3-BETA (same 4.2-STABLE userland), and the problem still occurred - cou= ldn=B4t su to root in X. Is the problem in the kernel? =20 How do I fix this? Is there a kernel option that needs to be activated? Tha= nks in advance. ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=3Dsignup To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 11:44:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from xena.gsicomp.on.ca (cr677933-a.ktchnr1.on.wave.home.com [24.43.230.149]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDCB37B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:44:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from hermes (hermes.gsicomp.on.ca [192.168.0.18]) by xena.gsicomp.on.ca (8.11.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f2IJghi82017; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:42:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <007c01c0afe3$45bdfd90$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matthew Emmerton" To: "Nick Sayer" , References: <006e01c0af4b$b0f6dbb0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <3AB4D50F.1060704@quack.kfu.com> Subject: Re: What about SRP auth for telnet and ftp? [was Re: SRA auth ] Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:40:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > > Would anyone be interested in seeing SRP functionality added? > The nice thing about patching telnet to add authentication > types is that the actual patching is fairly limited -- the code just > sort of lays alongside the rest in libtelnet. Yes, that's a definite plus when it comes to maintainance! > But if you're going to bother, the first thing you should do is add some > better session encryption. The telnetd that comes with the SRP distribution supports a ton of stuff, including SSL/TLS, DES3 and CAST. A quick scan shows that the majority of code uses a BSD-style licence, which is good. I'll have to hook up with the telnetd maintainer on this. The only monkey wrench is that SRP uses a new password-file format (Exponential Password Suite). I'm thinking that the better way is to add support for 'eps' passwords via /etc/login.conf (just as md5 and des passwords are supported), and ensure that the appropriate libraries are around to handle this case. -- Matt Emmerton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 12:33: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E58837B719 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:33:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2IKVt201726; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:31:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:31:55 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103182031.f2IKVt201726@earth.backplane.com> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: Jonathan Lemon , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Not only ftpd's problem with ls */../*..... References: <200103181611.f2IGBf894065@cwsys.cwsent.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ultimately the only thing I care about is that we not arbitrarily limit a global libc function by default, so I don't care which solution is adopted (api call, structural flag/field, resource limit) as long as the default for glob() is left unlimited. There are advantages and disadvantages to using the datasize resource limit or an API call / structural field inside ftpd to limit the glob function. The biggest advantage of the datasize resource limit is that it is under the ultimate control of the sysad and requires no changes to the system at all (other then backing out the glob commit). The disadvantage is that our current installworld process will not update inetd.conf autoamtically, so most of our target audience won't get the fix. The advantage of an API call / structure field is that we can build a reasonable limit into ftpd (and only ftpd), so our target audience gets the fix as the default, but now we have to provide an additional option to ftpd to set (or entirely remove) the limit to give sysads the ability to adjust it. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 13:21:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B686F37B71B for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:45:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2IKlmL00993; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:47:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103182047.f2IKlmL00993@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: rand@meridian-enviro.com Cc: Mike Tancsa , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:50:36 CST." <87elvu6hdv.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:47:48 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The first time I did this I thought something was broken when I > watched the newfs output those duplicate super block locations. It was > about 10 seconds between each block! After a search of the FreeBSD > lists I found a reference to initializing the array, and just waited. > > On ttyv1 the kernel issues a message when the array initialization is > done, so I usually just wait for that. Newfs is even more pessimal, due to the alignment fixup the driver has to perform. However, the array is perfectly usable while it's being initialised. Just. Dog. Slow. 8) -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 14:19:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (cb58709-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.17.241.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A05837B71B for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:19:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlemon@flugsvamp.com) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f2IMFLw48314; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:15:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlemon) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:15:21 -0600 From: Jonathan Lemon To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: Matt Dillon , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not only ftpd's problem with ls */../*..... Message-ID: <20010318161521.G82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> References: <200103172253.f2HMrZ008412@prism.flugsvamp.com> <200103180027.f2I0RSn96769@earth.backplane.com> <20010317222918.B82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> <200103180543.f2I5hb398084@earth.backplane.com> <20010318160034.F82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <20010318160034.F82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 04:00:34PM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > Patch attached. Oh yeah, this doesn't include the patch to ftpd, which is fairly trivial. -- Jonathan Index: ftpd.c =================================================================== RCS file: /ncvs/src/libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c,v retrieving revision 1.72 diff -u -r1.72 ftpd.c --- ftpd.c 2000/12/20 03:34:54 1.72 +++ ftpd.c 2001/03/18 22:30:45 @@ -189,6 +189,13 @@ char *pid_file = NULL; /* + * Limit number of pathnames that glob can return. + * A limit of 0 indicates the number of pathnames is unlimited. + */ +#define MAXGLOBARGS 16384 +# + +/* * Timeout intervals for retrying connections * to hosts that don't accept PORT cmds. This * is a kludge, but given the problems with TCP... @@ -2620,6 +2627,8 @@ int flags = GLOB_BRACE|GLOB_NOCHECK|GLOB_QUOTE|GLOB_TILDE; memset(&gl, 0, sizeof(gl)); + gl.gl_matchc = MAXGLOBARGS; + flags |= GLOB_MAXPATH; freeglob = 1; if (glob(whichf, flags, 0, &gl)) { reply(550, "not found"); Index: popen.c =================================================================== RCS file: /ncvs/src/libexec/ftpd/popen.c,v retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.19 popen.c --- popen.c 2000/09/04 05:47:14 1.19 +++ popen.c 2001/03/18 22:26:38 @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ int flags = GLOB_BRACE|GLOB_NOCHECK|GLOB_QUOTE|GLOB_TILDE; memset(&gl, 0, sizeof(gl)); + gl.gl_matchc = MAXGLOBARGS; + flags |= GLOB_MAXPATH; if (glob(argv[argc], flags, NULL, &gl)) gargv[gargc++] = strdup(argv[argc]); else To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 14:36:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (cb58709-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.17.241.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18A037B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:36:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlemon@flugsvamp.com) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f2IM0YJ47746; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:00:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlemon) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:00:34 -0600 From: Jonathan Lemon To: Matt Dillon Cc: Jonathan Lemon , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not only ftpd's problem with ls */../*..... Message-ID: <20010318160034.F82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> References: <200103172253.f2HMrZ008412@prism.flugsvamp.com> <200103180027.f2I0RSn96769@earth.backplane.com> <20010317222918.B82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> <200103180543.f2I5hb398084@earth.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <200103180543.f2I5hb398084@earth.backplane.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:43:37PM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote: > > :> be set with a new api call, setgloblimit()? Or perhaps even just > :> have the setgloblimit() API call and don't even bother with a new flag. > : > :I would think a better idea is to have the system default to a hard > :limit, and then allow those programs that know better to override it. > :This way, we catch most naive uses of glob, while allowing those users > :who actually want to iterate over more paths to continue. You'll also > :note that the glob interface explicitly allows continuing from a previous > :match (which is what gl_pathc is for), so this fits in nicely. The > :only additional change I can think of is to add a new error return to > :explicitly alert the user that the match limit was hit. > : > :Doing it this way also negates the need for a setgloblimit. > > Imposing a limit by default is no better then having the hard limit as > a default in the first place. The goal of this fix should be to be as > non-intrusive as possible. Having a hard limit by default is extremely > intrusive. It would be almost as bad as putting a hard limit in, say, > 'find'. You don't know *what* type of program will be using the > interface. Just because someone can D.O.S. ftpd doesn't mean that > you should suddenly impose an arbitrary limit on every single program > that might use the interface. Nor would it be appropriate to impose an > additional burden on the programmers using the interface to require them > to explicitly turn off the hard limit if they don't want it... that is > a terrible default API for something like glob! It immediately imposes > the arbitrary limit on every single program using the interface... a limit > that the programmers using the interface probably assume doesn't exist. And this differs in what way from having limit impose a hard resource limit on various programs? Like, say, openfiles, which limits the number of open descriptors, a limit which "programmers using the interface probably assume doesn't exist"? > It makes to try to protect programmers from themselves a little, but > it doesn't make sense to pollute the functionality and scaleability of > the default interfaces to reach that end. We shouldn't be trying to > protect idiots from themselves... let them learn the hard way so the > rest of us can use these APIs without having to go through loops with > flags and options to make them act the way we want them to act. We aren't trying to protect programmers from themselves, we are trying to make it easier for them. Or are you advocating that every single user of glob should be required to sanity check the pattern before making a glob() call? Regardless, this close to -release, I will concur that there probably isn't sufficient time to test this change, so I have a set of patches to implement the limit on a per-call basis (as described earlier). Patch attached. -- Jonathan Index: include/glob.h =================================================================== RCS file: /ncvs/src/include/glob.h,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 glob.h --- include/glob.h 1998/02/25 02:15:59 1.3 +++ include/glob.h 2001/03/18 21:19:49 @@ -76,9 +76,11 @@ #define GLOB_NOMAGIC 0x0200 /* GLOB_NOCHECK without magic chars (csh). */ #define GLOB_QUOTE 0x0400 /* Quote special chars with \. */ #define GLOB_TILDE 0x0800 /* Expand tilde names from the passwd file. */ +#define GLOB_MAXPATH 0x1000 /* limit number of returned paths */ #define GLOB_NOSPACE (-1) /* Malloc call failed. */ #define GLOB_ABEND (-2) /* Unignored error. */ +#define GLOB_LIMIT (-3) /* Path limit was hit. */ __BEGIN_DECLS int glob __P((const char *, int, int (*)(const char *, int), glob_t *)); Index: lib/libc/gen//glob.c =================================================================== RCS file: /ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/glob.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 glob.c --- lib/libc/gen//glob.c 2001/03/16 19:05:20 1.13 +++ lib/libc/gen//glob.c 2001/03/18 21:46:06 @@ -80,14 +80,6 @@ #include "collate.h" -/* - * XXX - * Arbitrarily limit the number of pathnames that glob may - * return, to prevent DoS attacks. This should probably be - * configurable by the user. - */ -#define MAX_GLOBENTRIES 16384 - #define DOLLAR '$' #define DOT '.' #define EOS '\0' @@ -147,14 +139,14 @@ static Char *g_strcat __P((Char *, const Char *)); #endif static int g_stat __P((Char *, struct stat *, glob_t *)); -static int glob0 __P((const Char *, glob_t *)); -static int glob1 __P((Char *, glob_t *)); -static int glob2 __P((Char *, Char *, Char *, glob_t *)); -static int glob3 __P((Char *, Char *, Char *, Char *, glob_t *)); -static int globextend __P((const Char *, glob_t *)); +static int glob0 __P((const Char *, glob_t *, int *)); +static int glob1 __P((Char *, glob_t *, int *)); +static int glob2 __P((Char *, Char *, Char *, glob_t *, int *)); +static int glob3 __P((Char *, Char *, Char *, Char *, glob_t *, int *)); +static int globextend __P((const Char *, glob_t *, int *)); static const Char * globtilde __P((const Char *, Char *, size_t, glob_t *)); -static int globexp1 __P((const Char *, glob_t *)); -static int globexp2 __P((const Char *, const Char *, glob_t *, int *)); +static int globexp1 __P((const Char *, glob_t *, int *)); +static int globexp2 __P((const Char *, const Char *, glob_t *, int *, int *)); static int match __P((Char *, Char *, Char *)); #ifdef DEBUG static void qprintf __P((const char *, Char *)); @@ -167,7 +159,7 @@ glob_t *pglob; { const u_char *patnext; - int c; + int c, limit; Char *bufnext, *bufend, patbuf[MAXPATHLEN+1]; patnext = (u_char *) pattern; @@ -177,6 +169,10 @@ if (!(flags & GLOB_DOOFFS)) pglob->gl_offs = 0; } + if (flags & GLOB_MAXPATH) + limit = pglob->gl_matchc; + else + limit = 0; pglob->gl_flags = flags & ~GLOB_MAGCHAR; pglob->gl_errfunc = errfunc; pglob->gl_matchc = 0; @@ -202,9 +198,9 @@ *bufnext = EOS; if (flags & GLOB_BRACE) - return globexp1(patbuf, pglob); + return globexp1(patbuf, pglob, &limit); else - return glob0(patbuf, pglob); + return glob0(patbuf, pglob, &limit); } /* @@ -212,22 +208,23 @@ * invoke the standard globbing routine to glob the rest of the magic * characters */ -static int globexp1(pattern, pglob) +static int globexp1(pattern, pglob, limit) const Char *pattern; glob_t *pglob; + int *limit; { const Char* ptr = pattern; int rv; /* Protect a single {}, for find(1), like csh */ if (pattern[0] == LBRACE && pattern[1] == RBRACE && pattern[2] == EOS) - return glob0(pattern, pglob); + return glob0(pattern, pglob, limit); while ((ptr = (const Char *) g_strchr((Char *) ptr, LBRACE)) != NULL) - if (!globexp2(ptr, pattern, pglob, &rv)) + if (!globexp2(ptr, pattern, pglob, &rv, limit)) return rv; - return glob0(pattern, pglob); + return glob0(pattern, pglob, limit); } @@ -236,10 +233,10 @@ * If it succeeds then it invokes globexp1 with the new pattern. * If it fails then it tries to glob the rest of the pattern and returns. */ -static int globexp2(ptr, pattern, pglob, rv) +static int globexp2(ptr, pattern, pglob, rv, limit) const Char *ptr, *pattern; glob_t *pglob; - int *rv; + int *rv, *limit; { int i; Char *lm, *ls; @@ -275,7 +272,7 @@ /* Non matching braces; just glob the pattern */ if (i != 0 || *pe == EOS) { - *rv = glob0(patbuf, pglob); + *rv = glob0(patbuf, pglob, limit); return 0; } @@ -322,7 +319,7 @@ #ifdef DEBUG qprintf("globexp2:", patbuf); #endif - *rv = globexp1(patbuf, pglob); + *rv = globexp1(patbuf, pglob, limit); /* move after the comma, to the next string */ pl = pm + 1; @@ -416,9 +413,10 @@ * to find no matches. */ static int -glob0(pattern, pglob) +glob0(pattern, pglob, limit) const Char *pattern; glob_t *pglob; + int *limit; { const Char *qpatnext; int c, err, oldpathc; @@ -481,7 +479,7 @@ qprintf("glob0:", patbuf); #endif - if ((err = glob1(patbuf, pglob)) != 0) + if ((err = glob1(patbuf, pglob, limit)) != 0) return(err); /* @@ -494,7 +492,7 @@ ((pglob->gl_flags & GLOB_NOCHECK) || ((pglob->gl_flags & GLOB_NOMAGIC) && !(pglob->gl_flags & GLOB_MAGCHAR)))) - return(globextend(pattern, pglob)); + return(globextend(pattern, pglob, limit)); else if (!(pglob->gl_flags & GLOB_NOSORT)) qsort(pglob->gl_pathv + pglob->gl_offs + oldpathc, pglob->gl_pathc - oldpathc, sizeof(char *), compare); @@ -509,16 +507,17 @@ } static int -glob1(pattern, pglob) +glob1(pattern, pglob, limit) Char *pattern; glob_t *pglob; + int *limit; { Char pathbuf[MAXPATHLEN+1]; /* A null pathname is invalid -- POSIX 1003.1 sect. 2.4. */ if (*pattern == EOS) return(0); - return(glob2(pathbuf, pathbuf, pattern, pglob)); + return(glob2(pathbuf, pathbuf, pattern, pglob, limit)); } /* @@ -527,9 +526,10 @@ * meta characters. */ static int -glob2(pathbuf, pathend, pattern, pglob) +glob2(pathbuf, pathend, pattern, pglob, limit) Char *pathbuf, *pathend, *pattern; glob_t *pglob; + int *limit; { struct stat sb; Char *p, *q; @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ *pathend = EOS; } ++pglob->gl_matchc; - return(globextend(pathbuf, pglob)); + return(globextend(pathbuf, pglob, limit)); } /* Find end of next segment, copy tentatively to pathend. */ @@ -572,15 +572,17 @@ while (*pattern == SEP) *pathend++ = *pattern++; } else /* Need expansion, recurse. */ - return(glob3(pathbuf, pathend, pattern, p, pglob)); + return(glob3(pathbuf, pathend, pattern, p, pglob, + limit)); } /* NOTREACHED */ } static int -glob3(pathbuf, pathend, pattern, restpattern, pglob) +glob3(pathbuf, pathend, pattern, restpattern, pglob, limit) Char *pathbuf, *pathend, *pattern, *restpattern; glob_t *pglob; + int *limit; { register struct dirent *dp; DIR *dirp; @@ -630,7 +632,7 @@ *pathend = EOS; continue; } - err = glob2(pathbuf, --dc, restpattern, pglob); + err = glob2(pathbuf, --dc, restpattern, pglob, limit); if (err) break; } @@ -658,9 +660,10 @@ * gl_pathv points to (gl_offs + gl_pathc + 1) items. */ static int -globextend(path, pglob) +globextend(path, pglob, limit) const Char *path; glob_t *pglob; + int *limit; { register char **pathv; register int i; @@ -668,8 +671,8 @@ char *copy; const Char *p; - if (pglob->gl_pathc > MAX_GLOBENTRIES) - return (GLOB_ABEND); + if (*limit && pglob->gl_pathc > *limit) + return (GLOB_LIMIT); newsize = sizeof(*pathv) * (2 + pglob->gl_pathc + pglob->gl_offs); pathv = pglob->gl_pathv ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 15: 7:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woody.ichilton.co.uk (woody.ichilton.co.uk [216.29.174.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC4937B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 15:07:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ian@woody.ichilton.co.uk) Received: by woody.ichilton.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 457487D1F; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:07:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:07:43 +0000 From: Ian Chilton To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Compile Problem Message-ID: <20010318230743.A12418@woody.ichilton.co.uk> Reply-To: Ian Chilton Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.13i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I have compiled -stable on 3 boxes. 1 which was cvsup's on Saturday morning worked, but the other 2 (from Saturday night and Sunday morning) failed. ===> sys/boot/i386/boot2 as --defsym FLAGS=0x80 /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot1.s -o boot1.o ld -nostdlib -static -N -e start -Ttext 0x7c00 -o boot1.out boot1.o objcopy -S -O binary boot1.out boot1 dd if=/dev/zero of=boot2.ldr bs=512 count=1 2>/dev/null *** Error code 126 Stop in /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/boot/i386. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/boot. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Bye for Now, Ian \|||/ (o o) /-----------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo----------------------------\ | Ian Chilton E-Mail: ian@ichilton.co.uk | | IRC Nick: GadgetMan Backup: ichilton@www.linux.org.uk | | ICQ: 16007717 / 104665842 Web : http://www.ichilton.co.uk | |--------------------------------------------------------------------| | For people who like peace and quiet: a phoneless cord | \--------------------------------------------------------------------/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 17:48:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu (soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E4A37B718; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:48:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjmiller@uclink4.berkeley.edu) Received: from localhost (mjm@localhost) by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2J1m7a31508; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:48:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjmiller@uclink4.berkeley.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: soda.csua.berkeley.edu: mjm owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:48:07 -0800 (PST) From: "Mark J. Miller" X-X-Sender: To: The Babbler Cc: Christopher Farley , , Subject: Re: newbie / bug reporting In-Reply-To: <3AB436F6.BCE2F7C1@babbleon.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You do mean 'audio CD,' right? And though I haven't really tested it, I think it sometimes takes multiple attempts (some w/ cd9660, some with ufsA) to produce the crash. On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, The Babbler wrote: > >Just as a data point, I repeatedly made the mistake of trying to mount a >data CD when I first got FreeBSD, and I never had it lock up or crash, >just say "invalid parameter." I didn't find the message all that >enlightening ("invalid file system" or something would be a big >improvment), but that's beside the point, which is: > >This problem is not universal. Not to say it isn't serious, but it >might be unresolved because not everybody is able to easily replicate >it. > > >> >> joup@bigfoot.com (joup@bigfoot.com) wrote: >> >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm running 4.2-RELEASE and it seems like I'm getting a bug similar to >> > >> > kern/21827: mount causes freebsd 4.1.1 to reboot >> > referenced at: >> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1005923+1008384+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-bugs/20001008.freebsd-bugs >> > >> > which applies only to 4.1.1, not 4.2. It is still open, but it doesn't >> > look like there's any mention of it with regards to 4.2. What should I >> > do? >> >> I was able to reproduce this under 4.3-BETA. >> >> A hard reboot and 30 minutes with fsck is a rather painful penalty for >> such an act. >> >> This PR is classified as 'open', which means that 'no sanity checking >> has been performed'. This was discussed in -STABLE back in November, >> however I don't think a patch was commited. >> >> -- >> Christopher Farley >> www.northernbrewer.com >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > >-- >"Brian, the man from babble-on" bts@babbleon.org >Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org >Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. >Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 18: 6:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A5737B71A for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 18:06:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA80297; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 03:04:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: j mckitrick Cc: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BETA induced nervousness References: <20010316214210.5a3dc591.steveo@eircom.net> <20010316205259.B34966@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 19 Mar 2001 03:04:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: j mckitrick's message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:53:00 +0000" Message-ID: Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG j mckitrick writes: > Sounds good to me. It would cut the s/n ratio. I really hope you meant the reverse :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 19:23:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from web11807.mail.yahoo.com (web11807.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BC4E37B71A for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 19:23:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wyldephyre2@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010319032339.78792.qmail@web11807.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [131.181.127.39] by web11807.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 19:23:39 PST Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 19:23:39 -0800 (PST) From: Haikal Saadh Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA To: Mike Meyer , Francisco Reyes Cc: Mike Meyer , Haikal Saadh , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <15026.62584.999579.19774@guru.mired.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --- Mike Meyer wrote: > Francisco Reyes types: > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Mike Meyer wrote: > > > Haikal Saadh types: > > > > > > > > --- Matthew Emmerton > wrote: > > > > > > What is a BETA system? Is it similiar to > CURRENT? > > > > > > > > > > Please search through the mailing list > archives > > > > > before asking questions. > > > > > This has been answered many times over the > last two > > > > > weeks. > > > > > Or maybe just read the FAQ > > > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/admin.html#dmin.html#RELEASE-CANDIDATE > >, > > > which makes it clear that the name changes just > identify what point of > > > the release cycle that particular snapshot of > -STABLE is at. > > I have seen several people tell Haikal to read the > FAQ, etc.... > > I really have to agree with him. I don't think > having a "Beta" label on > > what is defined in the handbook as "Stable" is a > good idea. > > > > By definition a "new user" to FreeBSD is someone > who doesn't know yet > > what are the right places to read/check. > > In that case, where did they find the information > needed to upgrade to > -STABLE? > > > I think responses like the ones he got are the > reason we consistantly over > > the years get views of sometimes been unfrienly to > new users. > > We're definitely friendlier to people who show > evidence of having done > some research themselves than to those who don't > show that evidence. > > Personally, I always provide a pointer to existing > documentation > rather than type it in myself. That saves me typing, > and the users > should learn about another valuable resource that > works faster than > the mail lists. > > Haikal wasn't asking for help, he was suggesting > inappropriate changes > to the system to try and help people who had gotten > past the newbie > stage - as demonstrated by managing to update to > -STABLE, getting > both userland and kernel - past a problem. > > > Perhaps a label of "Pre-Release" may be less > confusing. "Beta" sure gives > > the wrong impression. > > That suggestion isn't inappropriate. On the other > hand the label "-RC" > (release candidate) stil generates problems, so I'm > not sure it would > work. I suspect that *any* change in name will > generate "I tried to > get -STABLE, and got -FOO" messages. Not changing it > would make life > difficult for users who *wanted* to know they were > getting a BETA or > RC version. > > Possibly this information needs to go in the > handbook on tracking > -STABLE, rather than a FAQ. > Or a Comment in the example supfile saying "This Can Get A Beta Release If A Code Freeze Is In Effect" kinda thing? I read the handbook chapter on CVSUpping, as well as the bit in The Complete FreeBSD, but it really was an information overload, and I just ended up having a go with the given example supfile. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 20:30: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chmod.ath.cx (CC2-1242.charter-stl.com [24.217.116.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ADB37B718; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:30:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx) Received: by chmod.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B4776A896; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 22:29:41 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 22:29:41 -0600 From: Andrew Hesford To: FreeBSD-stable , FreeBSD-questions Subject: XFree86 and i810 Message-ID: <20010318222941.A47265@cec.wustl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Loop: Andrew Hesford Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I know the i810 is a known problem in FreeBSD while running XFree86 4.0.2 or greater, and I've seen complaints on the mailing list. The trouble, as far as I can tell, is that the i810 driver doesn't deallocate GART resources when switching consoles, and upon switching back to the X console, there is no memory the xserver can use to display. The server crashes, and if it is restarted, it still fails to deallocate resources, causing garbled video. Looking at driver code, I see the deallocation code is commented out, which leads me to believe that the linux agpgart driver automatically deallocates resources when not in use. This leads me to three questions: 1) Is it possible to make the agpgart-handling code in FreeBSD deallocate unused resources automatically, so that XFree86 will work as-is? 2) Can somebody implement a patch for XFree86 to deallocate GART resources when not in use? I looked at the driver, and there is more to learn about XFree86's structure than i have time for. 3) Is my analysis of the problem accurate? If not, has anybody found the cause of our woes? -- Andrew Hesford ajh3@chmod.ath.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 20:56: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nbrewer.com (sparge.nbrewer.com [208.42.68.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAF837B71A; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:55:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@nbrewer.com) Received: by mail.nbrewer.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C62C4383072; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 22:55:54 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 22:55:54 -0600 From: Christopher Farley To: "Mark J. Miller" Cc: The Babbler , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newbie / bug reporting Message-ID: <20010318225552.B16395@northernbrewer.com> Mail-Followup-To: Christopher Farley , "Mark J. Miller" , The Babbler , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <3AB436F6.BCE2F7C1@babbleon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mjmiller@uclink4.berkeley.edu on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 05:48:07PM -0800 Organization: Northern Brewer, St. Paul, MN Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark J. Miller (mjmiller@uclink4.berkeley.edu) wrote: > You do mean 'audio CD,' right? And though I haven't really tested it, I > think it sometimes takes multiple attempts (some w/ cd9660, some with > ufsA) to produce the crash. I experienced an immediate reboot with no panic messages when I tried to mount an audio CD in my Plextor CD-R PX-W1210A. (Don't ask why I tried to do this...) Never having seen FreeBSD behave this way before, I did it again, and it instantly rebooted. Syslogd recorded nothing, it just went down. After an unpleasant time with fsck, I learned what a lost+found directory was, and I decided that I didn't really want to repeat the crash for a third time. If there's any valuable information that could be gleaned, I've got a spare hard drive and would be willing to give it another go... -- Christopher Farley www.northernbrewer.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 21: 0:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cr300278-a.flfrd1.on.wave.home.com (cr300278-a.flfrd1.on.wave.home.com [24.43.138.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FE5437B71B for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:00:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeff@tabcrawler.com) From: "Jeff Doucette" Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:52:19 -0600 X-Mailer: STMP Sender To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Hey Message-Id: <20010319050022.6FE5437B71B@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hey Guys, I have an auction on Dell Poweredge Ram, low price: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1222481574 Also, if you need PC-133 Infineon Ram, I sell it for $52.00 Have a great day, try not to work too hard..:) -Jeff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 21: 4:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CF837B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:04:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2J540A03836; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:04:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:04:00 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103190504.f2J540A03836@earth.backplane.com> To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Not only ftpd's problem with ls */../*..... References: <200103172253.f2HMrZ008412@prism.flugsvamp.com> <200103180027.f2I0RSn96769@earth.backplane.com> <20010317222918.B82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> <200103180543.f2I5hb398084@earth.backplane.com> <20010318160034.F82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :And this differs in what way from having limit impose a hard resource :limit on various programs? Like, say, openfiles, which limits the number :of open descriptors, a limit which "programmers using the interface probably :assume doesn't exist"? Oh come on, you know very well that this differs in major ways. Don't even try to equate an arbitrary libc-originated memory limit from an OS limit. For one thing, the arbitrary limit you imposed in the first patch doesn't even begin to take into account available resources on the machine. It just slaps in a 'hey, lets limit ourselves to 16384 elements and who gives a damn whether the user or sysad wants to be able to handle more' type of limitation into libc. That's just plain silly. I'm sorry, but it is. For another thing, *NONE* of us like the limits set by the operating system. We would love to get rid of them. Just because limits exist is hardly an excuse to go slam more limits into the system, especially arbitrary ones. It's that sort of thinking that has resulted in many of the ridiculous limitations already in the sytem, such as maximum path lengths, descriptors, socket buf sizes, stat structure (file size, which required the syscall to be completely redone), and so forth. Users can hang themselves a billion different ways. I am not interested in getting hung up by library calls that assume I'm an idiot and decide whether I should be allowed to do something or not simply because it might use a lot of memory. That's ridiculous. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 21:11: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nova.fnal.gov (nova.fnal.gov [131.225.121.207]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAA937B71A for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:10:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zingelman@fnal.gov) Received: from localhost (tez@localhost) by nova.fnal.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA28028; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:16:09 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: nova.fnal.gov: tez owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:16:09 -0600 (CST) From: Tim Zingelman X-Sender: To: Boris Popov Cc: , Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA + smbfs -> panic: malloc: wrong bucket In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I'm getting this repeatedly on several machines... after mounting a smbfs > > then sitting idle for a while, just an ls -l on the fs causes the panic. > > Good. Hope this happens with 1.3.6. If not - please upgrade. Check > also if kernel and smbfs module built against the same source tree (eg, if > you upgrade kernel, smbfs module should be also rebuilded). After a cvsup to RELENG_4 on March 16th, make buildworld, make kernel, make installworld, mergemaster & reboot. Then I built & installed from ports: # $FreeBSD: ports/net/smbfs/Makefile,v 1.5 2001/02/27 12:07:27 bp Exp $ > There is probably a how-to on debugging KLDs in the handbook (At > least I'm remember DES wrote it). Yes, that is how I got as far as I did in my last email. I've made a brand new system, with a debug GENERIC kernel & debug smbfs.ko and no other modules loaded, and gotten it to crash... but I forgot to set dumpdev, so I didn't get a dump :( I'm trying again to get it to fail. - Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 21:20:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from seatle.vredesdorp.nl (seatle.demon.nl [195.173.228.191]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8611837B71A for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:20:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rotan@seatle.vredesdorp.nl) Received: (from rotan@localhost) by seatle.vredesdorp.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA11857; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 06:21:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rotan) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 06:21:07 +0100 From: "Robert Tan T.G." To: Martin McFlySr Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make world Message-ID: <20010319062107.A11844@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> References: <20010318081642.A5067@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> <8373951066.20010318184010@McFlySr.Kurgan.Ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <8373951066.20010318184010@McFlySr.Kurgan.Ru>; from Martin@McFlySr.Kurgan.Ru on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 06:40:10PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG tnx for your reply but it didn't fix my problem.. rotan. On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 06:40:10PM +0300, Martin McFlySr wrote: > Hello Robert Tan T.G., > > Sunday, 18 March 2001, 10:16:42, you wrote: > > > > RTTG> Im having problems rebuilding my system after a successfull cvsup. > .... > -->> > RTTG> Error: your port uses an old layout. Please update it to match this > RTTG> bsd.port.mk. If you have updated your ports collection via cvsup and > RTTG> are still getting this error, see Q12 and Q13 in the cvsup FAQ on > RTTG> http://www.polstra.com for further information. > RTTG> *** Error code 1 > > You are can fix this: > > $ rm -fr /usr/ports > $ cvsup ports-supfile > > or: > $ find /usr/ports/ -name patches -type d -exec rm -rf {} \; > $ find /usr/ports/ -name pkg -type d -exec rm -rf {} \; > $ find /usr/ports/ -name md5 -type f -exec rm -f {} \; > $ cvsup ports-supfile > > > (c) FAQ of Fido7.Ru.Unix.Bsd > > > -- > Sunday, 18 March 2001, > 18:36 > > Best regards from future, > Martin McFlySr, HillDale. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 23: 6:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dnvrpop1.dnvr.uswest.net (dnvrpop1.dnvr.uswest.net [206.196.128.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D45737B71B for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:06:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mharvey@qwest.net) Received: (qmail 29337 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 07:06:40 -0000 Received: from fdialup252.dnvr.uswest.net (HELO qwest.net) (207.225.104.252) by dnvrpop1.dnvr.uswest.net with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 07:06:40 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:08:45 -0700 Message-ID: <3AB5B07D.37006949@qwest.net> From: "Charlie Root" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 23:17:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from khan.acc.umu.se (khan.acc.umu.se [130.239.18.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA8737B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:17:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from markush@acc.umu.se) Received: from mao.acc.umu.se (root@mao.acc.umu.se [130.239.18.154]) by khan.acc.umu.se (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2J7HeS13257; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:17:40 +0100 (MET) Received: (from markush@localhost) by mao.acc.umu.se (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id IAA24162; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:17:39 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:17:39 +0100 From: Markus Holmberg To: Rich Morin Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports vs. packages... Message-ID: <20010319081739.A23868@acc.umu.se> References: <3AB3C1C2.67E1AB9B@yahoo.com> <20010317125349.E22316@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010318194637.A10260@acc.umu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3-current-20000511i In-Reply-To: ; from rdm@cfcl.com on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:47:17AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:47:17AM -0800, Rich Morin wrote: > At 7:46 PM +0100 3/18/01, Markus Holmberg wrote: > >Isn't there a small security advantage with building from source > >(compared to downloading packages from an untrusted party)? > > Access to the source code (and even a close examination of it) isn't > enough. See Ken Thompson's Turing Award lecture, "Reflections on > Trusting Trust": http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html I didn't mean that having the source implies that the software is "safe". I meant that you could be assured that you got what the port creator created, and not something that had been tampered with. If what the port creator created was "safe" or not, is a whole other issue. Markus -- Markus Holmberg | Give me Unix or give me a typewriter. markush@acc.umu.se | http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 18 23:36:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from june.cs.washington.edu (june.cs.washington.edu [128.95.1.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD7237B718 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:36:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wolman@cs.washington.edu) Received: from miles.cs.washington.edu (miles.cs.washington.edu [128.95.4.177]) by june.cs.washington.edu (8.11.0/8.9.3/0.3j) with ESMTP id f2J7aaU08973 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:36:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wolman@cs.washington.edu) Received: from miles.cs.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by miles.cs.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03085 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:36:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wolman@miles.cs.washington.edu) Message-Id: <200103190736.XAA03085@miles.cs.washington.edu> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: will there be an MFC of the openssh broken pipe fix? Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:36:36 -0800 From: "Alec Wolman" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Revision 1.14 of src/crypto/openssh/session.c is a fix for the openssh broken pipe problem. Will it be merged before the 4.3 release? -Alec To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 0:12:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7288037B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:12:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2J8CAp04946; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:12:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:12:10 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103190812.f2J8CAp04946@earth.backplane.com> To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not only ftpd's problem with ls */../*..... References: <200103172253.f2HMrZ008412@prism.flugsvamp.com> <200103180027.f2I0RSn96769@earth.backplane.com> <20010317222918.B82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> <200103180543.f2I5hb398084@earth.backplane.com> <20010318160034.F82645@prism.flugsvamp.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, it's better then nothing I suppose but it doesn't really solve the ftpd DOS attack (nor does the original patch). Long paths can still result in a DOS. The limit should probably be specified in bytes rather then entries. That would solve the problem neatly. Whatever happens, the release can't go out with the current patch in place. Even an incomplete patch which defaults to 'off' is better then a broken patch which defaults to 'on'. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 1: 6:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hcshh.hcs.de (hcshh.hcs.de [194.123.40.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F1A37B726 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 01:06:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hm@hcs.de) Received: from hcswork.hcs.de (hcswork.hcs.de [192.76.124.5]) by hcshh.hcs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834545D08 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:06:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by hcswork.hcs.de (Postfix, from userid 200) id 6801152E; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:06:38 +0100 (MET) Subject: 4.3-BETA: RTC BIOS diagnostic error 3f To: FreeBSD-Stable List Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:06:38 +0100 (MET) Reply-To: hm@hcs.de Organization: HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL84 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20010319090638.6801152E@hcswork.hcs.de> From: hm@hcs.de (Hellmuth Michaelis) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, on an HP NetServer LC2000 with 4.3-Beta i get the following message at boot time: RTC BIOS diagnostic error 3f Everything seems to run well, should i be concerned ? hellmuth -- Hellmuth Michaelis Tel +49 40 55 97 47-70 HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH Fax +49 40 55 97 47-77 Oldesloer Strasse 97-99 Mail hm [at] hcs.de D-22457 Hamburg WWW http://www.hcs.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 1:27:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp (pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp [133.35.85.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4A5F37B71B for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 01:27:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp) Received: (qmail 5642 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2001 18:27:28 +0900 Message-ID: <20010319092728.5637.qmail@pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: how to use sound device in full-duplex ? In-Reply-To: <20010224181126K.iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> References: <20010224181126K.iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:27:26 +0900 From: Mamoru Iwaki X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 70 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I'd like to know the way how I can use sound device in full-duplex. I want to input sound stream with audio device and immediately output the stream into the same audio device for playback, without waiting for the end of input stream. I mean, it should simply make echoback of input, as fast as possible. For the purpose, I wrote the following program. From: Mamoru Iwaki Subject: sound driver kills kernel silently Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:11:26 +0900 > [PROGRAM] > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > #define DEV_IN "/dev/dsp" > #define DEV_OUT DEV_IN > #define BUFLEN 1 > > int main(void) { > int fdi, fdo; > char x[BUFLEN]; > > if ((fdi = open(DEV_IN, O_RDONLY)) == -1) { > perror("File open failure for read: " DEV_IN); > exit(1); > } > > if ((fdo = open(DEV_IN, O_WRONLY)) == -1) { > perror("File open failure for write: " DEV_IN); > exit(1); > } > > while (read(fdi, &x, sizeof(x)) > 0) write(fdo, &x, sizeof(x)); > > return 0; > } It has worked the last December, but not for now. It causes the following messages and no sound: pcm0: record overrun, dumping 8128 bytes pcm0: record overrun, dumping 8100 bytes pcm0: record overrun, dumping 8076 bytes When audio device is opened in read-write mode, it still not works. Are there any ideas to make the above simple echoback audio program with full-duplex property. Thanks. [ENVIRONMENT] % uname -a FreeBSD mi000.merlin.gs.niigata-u.ac.jp 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: Mon Mar 19 16:32:24 JST 2001 root@mi000.merlin.gs.niigata-u.ac.jp:/usr/obj/amd/mi004/home2/FreeBSD-src/stable4/src/sys/MI i386 % cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Mar 19 2001 16:30:59 Installed devices: pcm0: at io 0x220 irq 5 drq 1:5 (1p/1r channels duplex) --- ----- Mamoru IWAKI (iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp) Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 2: 6: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (ppp-224-156.usc.edu [128.125.224.156]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9443537B718; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:06:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E44BB66BD5; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:06:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:06:05 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Alec Wolman Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, green@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: will there be an MFC of the openssh broken pipe fix? Message-ID: <20010319020605.A4427@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200103190736.XAA03085@miles.cs.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103190736.XAA03085@miles.cs.washington.edu>; from wolman@cs.washington.edu on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 11:36:36PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 11:36:36PM -0800, Alec Wolman wrote: >=20 > Revision 1.14 of src/crypto/openssh/session.c is a fix for > the openssh broken pipe problem. Will it be merged before > the 4.3 release? I hope so :-) Kris --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6tdoNWry0BWjoQKURAntfAJ45GlaExThcOT71gJgEGxLv+vL1EACg9OOd EnshoMzZ9asuwZO5MJ00sbY= =kJrP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 2: 7:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (ppp-224-156.usc.edu [128.125.224.156]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C674937B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:07:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2503666E9D; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:07:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:07:16 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ARCH in /etc/make.conf Message-ID: <20010319020716.B4427@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from roman@harmonic.co.il on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 12:44:38PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 12:44:38PM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > Hi, > I've noticed that for K6-2 -march=k6 is implied. > Browsing through gcc code teaches me that ``k6 - doesn't have pipelines'' > which is wrong for sure for K6-2. That may explain why -march=pentium > binaries (played with graphics/xine port) run faster than -march=k6. > Perhaps it's wiser to set -march=pentium for K6-2 (of course, with 3DNOW - > I haven't seen yet what variables are set for benefit of ports like mpg123) Can you produce benchmarks showing that this is the right thing to do? Kris --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6tdpTWry0BWjoQKURAlZ6AJ9S6lgkUVn78gX0t8Y7LdoKbRaDSACgoMUR vH+Am5HXMBC2b7o/e/B5zRo= =UW6F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 2:20:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from normanet.org (ACaen-101-2-1-7.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.7.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC21137B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:20:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.boucey@normanet.fr) Received: (qmail 24247 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 10:22:54 -0000 Received: from by nux2.normanet.org with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.169248 secs); 19/03/2001 11:22:54 Received: from daemon.normanet.org (192.168.1.114) by normanet.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 10:22:53 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:28:25 +0000 (GMT) From: Michel Boucey X-Sender: mic@daemon.normanet.org To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Cordialement, Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 2:26:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (ppp-224-156.usc.edu [128.125.224.156]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF1C37B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:26:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8C6366BD5; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:26:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:26:27 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Markus Holmberg Cc: Kris Kennaway , Eric M Logan , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: ports vs. packages... Message-ID: <20010319022627.C4782@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3AB3C1C2.67E1AB9B@yahoo.com> <20010317125349.E22316@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010318194637.A10260@acc.umu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CblX+4bnyfN0pR09" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010318194637.A10260@acc.umu.se>; from markush@acc.umu.se on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:46:38PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --CblX+4bnyfN0pR09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:46:38PM +0100, Markus Holmberg wrote: > Isn't there a small security advantage with building from source > (compared to downloading packages from an untrusted party)? >=20 > With source one can be assured that the port is built from unmodified > data since the downloaded distfiles are checked with checksums. > (Assuming the local ports tree can be trusted) >=20 > As opposed to packages where there is no verification at all that you > didn't receive something manipulated. (The possibility of someone setting > up a FreeBSD mirror distributing trojaned packages disturbs me) >=20 > I'm not sure if I overlooked something though.. You overlooked the possibility of a trojaned (intentionally or via a compromise) cvsup server. It would be nice to add integrity protection to cvsup so the user could verify that the copy they receive is the one which was obtained from the master repository, but it requires nontrivial changes to the cvsup code. WRT packages, there is a pkg_sign utility included in 4.3-BETA which we intend to use in the future to sign packages, to allow users to verify that they did indeed come from the FreeBSD package building cluster (but note that this still isn't a guarantee against malicious code which was built by the package cluster, through compromise or through malicious code obtained from the software author) Kris --CblX+4bnyfN0pR09 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6td7TWry0BWjoQKURAgCFAKCmVr8zgX08MJmWis6GXt5KVFscxgCgx/SJ LYn7nUihGGdBojmzjNmrUxA= =pH8f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CblX+4bnyfN0pR09-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 2:52:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from khan.acc.umu.se (khan.acc.umu.se [130.239.18.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375C037B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:52:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from markush@acc.umu.se) Received: from mao.acc.umu.se (root@mao.acc.umu.se [130.239.18.154]) by khan.acc.umu.se (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2JAqRS23154; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:52:27 +0100 (MET) Received: (from markush@localhost) by mao.acc.umu.se (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id LAA14451; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:52:26 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:52:26 +0100 From: Markus Holmberg To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Eric M Logan , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: ports vs. packages... Message-ID: <20010319115226.A11740@acc.umu.se> References: <3AB3C1C2.67E1AB9B@yahoo.com> <20010317125349.E22316@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010318194637.A10260@acc.umu.se> <20010319022627.C4782@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3-current-20000511i In-Reply-To: <20010319022627.C4782@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 02:26:27AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 02:26:27AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > (Assuming the local ports tree can be trusted) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > You overlooked the possibility of a trojaned (intentionally or via a > compromise) cvsup server. It would be nice to add integrity > protection to cvsup so the user could verify that the copy they > receive is the one which was obtained from the master repository, but > it requires nontrivial changes to the cvsup code. (see above) But since there is no practical way to ensure the integrity of your local ports tree (at least not when getting it over the network) it is in practise no more secure than packages; I see that. :( > WRT packages, there is a pkg_sign utility included in 4.3-BETA which > we intend to use in the future to sign packages, to allow users to > verify that they did indeed come from the FreeBSD package building > cluster (but note that this still isn't a guarantee against malicious > code which was built by the package cluster, through compromise or > through malicious code obtained from the software author) Sounds good! Regards, Markus. -- Markus Holmberg | Give me Unix or give me a typewriter. markush@acc.umu.se | http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 2:58: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from normanet.org (ACaen-101-2-1-7.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.7.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C618837B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:57:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.boucey@normanet.fr) Received: (qmail 24366 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 10:59:59 -0000 Received: from by nux2.normanet.org with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.063021 secs); 19/03/2001 11:59:59 Received: from daemon.normanet.org (192.168.1.114) by normanet.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 10:59:59 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:05:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Michel Boucey X-Sender: mic@daemon.normanet.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: can't make buildworld Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! I'm on FreeBSD 4.1.I've download stable sources and during the make buildworld, that's stop in kdump compilation : awk: In file included from newline in string #include Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 3:17:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83D6537B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 03:17:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 2972 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 11:17:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 11:17:41 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB5EAD5.79460290@urx.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 03:17:41 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Boucey Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't make buildworld References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Michel Boucey wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm on FreeBSD 4.1.I've download stable sources and during the make > buildworld, that's stop in kdump compilation : > > awk: In file included from newline in string #include source line 1:^M > ^M > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.hawk: :18: newline in > string #include redefined^M > ^M > awk: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.hnewline in string > #include this is the location of the previous definition^M > In file included from :70:^M > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: `CDRIOCBLANK' > redefined^M > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is the > location of the previous definition^M > cpp: output pipe has been closed^M > *** Error code 2^M > ^M > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump.^M > *** Error code 1^M > ^M > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin.^M > *** Error code 1^M > ^M > Stop in /usr/src.^M > *** Error code 1^M > ^M > Stop in /usr/src.^M > *** Error code 1^M > ^M > Stop in /usr/src.^M > daemon# ^D^H^Hexit^M > > Script done on Mon Mar 19 11:20:52 2001 How did you download. You shouldn't be seeing those ^M's unless you downloaded it to a DOS system and then moved it to FreeBSD as binary. I just finished a buildworld about 30 minutes ago and went through that section with only a couple of messages. rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/inc lude /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/kdump.c ioctl.c /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace/subr.c In file included from ioctl.c:86: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.h:18: warning: `MDF_ACTIVE' redefined /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.h:81: warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from ioctl.c:98: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: `CDRIOCBLANK' redefined /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is the location of the previous definition cd /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump; make _EXTRADEPEND echo kdump: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend ===> usr.bin/kenv rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include /usr/src/usr.bin/kenv/kenv.c cd /usr/src/usr.bin/kenv; make _EXTRADEPEND echo kenv: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend ===> usr.bin/key rm -f .depend > > Thanks for help ... > > Cordialement, > > Michel Boucey Administrateur Systčme > > Société Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 3:29:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from normanet.org (ACaen-101-2-1-7.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.7.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77D1937B71B for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 03:29:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.boucey@normanet.fr) Received: (qmail 24437 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 11:31:52 -0000 Received: from by nux2.normanet.org with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.066294 secs); 19/03/2001 12:31:52 Received: from daemon.normanet.org (192.168.1.114) by normanet.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 11:31:51 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:37:24 +0000 (GMT) From: Michel Boucey X-Sender: mic@daemon.normanet.org To: Kent Stewart Cc: Michel Boucey , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't make buildworld In-Reply-To: <3AB5EAD5.79460290@urx.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've download successfully with cvsup. This output is from script, as explain in Handbook, to have a log. Cordialement, Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Kent Stewart wrote: >=20 >=20 > Michel Boucey wrote: > >=20 > > Hi! > >=20 > > I'm on FreeBSD 4.1.I've download stable sources and during the make > > buildworld, that's stop in kdump compilation : > >=20 > > awk: In file included from newline in string #include > source line 1:^M > > ^M > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.hawk: :18: newline in > > string #include > redefined^M > > ^M > > awk: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.hnewline in stri= ng > > #include > this is the location of the previous definition^M > > In file included from :70:^M > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: `CDRIOCBLA= NK' > > redefined^M > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is the > > location of the previous definition^M > > cpp: output pipe has been closed^M > > *** Error code 2^M > > ^M > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump.^M > > *** Error code 1^M > > ^M > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin.^M > > *** Error code 1^M > > ^M > > Stop in /usr/src.^M > > *** Error code 1^M > > ^M > > Stop in /usr/src.^M > > *** Error code 1^M > > ^M > > Stop in /usr/src.^M > > daemon# ^D^H^Hexit^M > >=20 > > Script done on Mon Mar 19 11:20:52 2001 >=20 > How did you download. You shouldn't be seeing those ^M's unless you > downloaded it to a DOS system and then moved it to FreeBSD as binary. > I just finished a buildworld about 30 minutes ago and went through > that section with only a couple of messages. >=20 > rm -f .depend > mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace > -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/inc > lude /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/kdump.c ioctl.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace/subr.c > In file included from ioctl.c:86: > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.h:18: warning: > `MDF_ACTIVE' redefined > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.h:81: warning: this > is the location of the previous definition > In file included from ioctl.c:98: > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: > `CDRIOCBLANK' redefined > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is the > location of the previous definition > cd /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump; make _EXTRADEPEND > echo kdump: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > =3D=3D=3D> usr.bin/kenv > rm -f .depend > mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include=20 > /usr/src/usr.bin/kenv/kenv.c > cd /usr/src/usr.bin/kenv; make _EXTRADEPEND > echo kenv: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > =3D=3D=3D> usr.bin/key > rm -f .depend >=20 > >=20 > > Thanks for help ... > >=20 > > Cordialement, > >=20 > > Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > > > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < > >=20 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 > --=20 > Kent Stewart > Richland, WA >=20 > mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com > http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html > FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 3:48:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C6EB37B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 03:48:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 5392 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 11:48:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 11:48:25 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB5F209.499F0619@urx.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 03:48:25 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Boucey Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't make buildworld References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Michel Boucey wrote: > > I've download successfully with cvsup. > This output is from script, as explain in Handbook, to have a log. It would appear that you have done something wrong but I don't have a clue what it could be. How did you setup cvsup and how is your system configured. Perhaps someone will have an idea of what is wrong. I just finished installing my cvsup of "tag=RELENG_4" and upgrade. So, the current stable will build, install, and boot. The question is what did we do that is different. I also log everything from the cvsup to the final install. A uname -a of my system is 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #14: Mon Mar 19 03:21:45 PST 2001 3:21 is 1121 GMT. Kent > > Cordialement, > > Michel Boucey Administrateur Systčme > > Société Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > > > > Michel Boucey wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > I'm on FreeBSD 4.1.I've download stable sources and during the make > > > buildworld, that's stop in kdump compilation : > > > > > > awk: In file included from newline in string #include > > source line 1:^M > > > ^M > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.hawk: :18: newline in > > > string #include > > redefined^M > > > ^M > > > awk: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.hnewline in string > > > #include > > this is the location of the previous definition^M > > > In file included from :70:^M > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: `CDRIOCBLANK' > > > redefined^M > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is the > > > location of the previous definition^M > > > cpp: output pipe has been closed^M > > > *** Error code 2^M > > > ^M > > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump.^M > > > *** Error code 1^M > > > ^M > > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin.^M > > > *** Error code 1^M > > > ^M > > > Stop in /usr/src.^M > > > *** Error code 1^M > > > ^M > > > Stop in /usr/src.^M > > > *** Error code 1^M > > > ^M > > > Stop in /usr/src.^M > > > daemon# ^D^H^Hexit^M > > > > > > Script done on Mon Mar 19 11:20:52 2001 > > > > How did you download. You shouldn't be seeing those ^M's unless you > > downloaded it to a DOS system and then moved it to FreeBSD as binary. > > I just finished a buildworld about 30 minutes ago and went through > > that section with only a couple of messages. > > > > rm -f .depend > > mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace > > -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/inc > > lude /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/kdump.c ioctl.c > > /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace/subr.c > > In file included from ioctl.c:86: > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.h:18: warning: > > `MDF_ACTIVE' redefined > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.h:81: warning: this > > is the location of the previous definition > > In file included from ioctl.c:98: > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: > > `CDRIOCBLANK' redefined > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is the > > location of the previous definition > > cd /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump; make _EXTRADEPEND > > echo kdump: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > > ===> usr.bin/kenv > > rm -f .depend > > mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include > > /usr/src/usr.bin/kenv/kenv.c > > cd /usr/src/usr.bin/kenv; make _EXTRADEPEND > > echo kenv: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > > ===> usr.bin/key > > rm -f .depend > > > > > > > > Thanks for help ... > > > > > > Cordialement, > > > > > > Michel Boucey Administrateur Systčme > > > > Société Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > -- > > Kent Stewart > > Richland, WA > > > > mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com > > http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html > > FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 3:59:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from normanet.org (ACaen-101-2-1-7.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.7.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A988A37B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 03:59:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.boucey@normanet.fr) Received: (qmail 24527 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 12:01:22 -0000 Received: from by nux2.normanet.org with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 1.176053 secs); 19/03/2001 13:01:21 Received: from daemon.normanet.org (192.168.1.114) by normanet.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 12:01:21 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:06:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Michel Boucey X-Sender: mic@daemon.normanet.org To: Kent Stewart Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: can't make buildworld In-Reply-To: <3AB5F209.499F0619@urx.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have used the supfile example to download stable sources. I just down some diff from an another server near from me: cvsup.fr.FreeBSD.org I try again ... Cordialement, Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Kent Stewart wrote: >=20 >=20 > Michel Boucey wrote: > >=20 > > I've download successfully with cvsup. > > This output is from script, as explain in Handbook, to have a log. >=20 > It would appear that you have done something wrong but I don't have a > clue what it could be. How did you setup cvsup and how is your system > configured. Perhaps someone will have an idea of what is wrong. I just > finished installing my cvsup of "tag=3DRELENG_4" and upgrade. So, the > current stable will build, install, and boot. The question is what did > we do that is different.=20 >=20 > I also log everything from the cvsup to the final install. A uname -a > of my system is >=20 > 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #14: Mon Mar 19 03:21:45 PST 2001 >=20 > 3:21 is 1121 GMT. >=20 > Kent >=20 > >=20 > > Cordialement, > >=20 > > Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > > > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < > >=20 > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Kent Stewart wrote: > >=20 > > > > > > > > > Michel Boucey wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > I'm on FreeBSD 4.1.I've download stable sources and during the make > > > > buildworld, that's stop in kdump compilation : > > > > > > > > awk: In file included from newline in string #include > > > source line 1:^M > > > > ^M > > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.hawk: :18: newline i= n > > > > string #include > > > redefined^M > > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is = the > > > > location of the previous definition^M > > > > cpp: output pipe has been closed^M > > > > *** Error code 2^M > > > > ^M > > > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump.^M > > > > *** Error code 1^M > > > > ^M > > > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin.^M > > > > *** Error code 1^M > > > > ^M > > > > Stop in /usr/src.^M > > > > *** Error code 1^M > > > > ^M > > > > Stop in /usr/src.^M > > > > *** Error code 1^M > > > > ^M > > > > Stop in /usr/src.^M > > > > daemon# ^D^H^Hexit^M > > > > > > > > Script done on Mon Mar 19 11:20:52 2001 > > > > > > How did you download. You shouldn't be seeing those ^M's unless you > > > downloaded it to a DOS system and then moved it to FreeBSD as binary. > > > I just finished a buildworld about 30 minutes ago and went through > > > that section with only a couple of messages. > > > > > > rm -f .depend > > > mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace > > > -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/inc > > > lude /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/kdump.c ioctl.c > > > /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace/subr.c > > > In file included from ioctl.c:86: > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/memrange.h:18: warning: > > > `MDF_ACTIVE' redefined > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.h:81: warning: this > > > is the location of the previous definition > > > In file included from ioctl.c:98: > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: > > > `CDRIOCBLANK' redefined > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is th= e > > > location of the previous definition > > > cd /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump; make _EXTRADEPEND > > > echo kdump: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > > > =3D=3D=3D> usr.bin/kenv > > > rm -f .depend > > > mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include > > > /usr/src/usr.bin/kenv/kenv.c > > > cd /usr/src/usr.bin/kenv; make _EXTRADEPEND > > > echo kenv: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > > > =3D=3D=3D> usr.bin/key > > > rm -f .depend > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for help ... > > > > > > > > Cordialement, > > > > > > > > Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > > > > > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > -- > > > Kent Stewart > > > Richland, WA > > > > > > mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com > > > http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html > > > FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ > > > > >=20 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 > --=20 > Kent Stewart > Richland, WA >=20 > mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com > http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html > FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 4:59:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from plab.ku.dk (plab.ku.dk [130.225.105.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC0F37B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 04:59:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from postmaster@plab.ku.dk) Received: (from root@localhost) by plab.ku.dk (8.11.0/8.9.3) id f2JCwxD91910 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org.AVP; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:58:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from postmaster@plab.ku.dk) Received: from raven.plab.ku.dk (raven.plab.ku.dk [130.225.105.67]) by plab.ku.dk (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2JCwws91902 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:58:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from postmaster@plab.ku.dk) Subject: Snapshot filesystem Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Dmitry Karasik Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Lines: 16 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 19 Mar 2001 13:57:35 +0100 X-Mailer: Mail::Mailer[v1.18] Net::SMTP[v2.13] Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! Does the snapshot filesystem work for freebsd? If so, then man what? -- Sincerely, Dmitry --- www.karasik.eu.org --- Life ain't fair, but the root password helps. - BOFH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 5: 1:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105B237B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 05:01:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2JD1Qd25498; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 05:01:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 05:01:26 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Dmitry Karasik Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Snapshot filesystem Message-ID: <20010319050125.U29888@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from dk@plab.ku.dk on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:57:35PM +0100 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Dmitry Karasik [010319 04:59] wrote: > > Hi! > > Does the snapshot filesystem work for freebsd? > If so, then man what? It's only available in the devel version (FreeBSD 5). -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 5:25: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dnvrpop1.dnvr.uswest.net (dnvrpop1.dnvr.uswest.net [206.196.128.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5206F37B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 05:25:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mharvey@qwest.net) Received: (qmail 25635 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 13:24:55 -0000 Received: from gdialup151.dnvr.uswest.net (HELO qwest.net) (207.225.105.151) by dnvrpop1.dnvr.uswest.net with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 13:24:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 06:27:03 -0700 Message-ID: <3AB60927.990776F1@qwest.net> From: "Myron Harvey" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: stable-supfile Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I cleaned out /usr/src/ in a running Cdrom distribution of FreeBSD 4.0 and cvsuped stable-supfile. The file /usr/src/UPDATING contains only one instruction.. Read /usr/src/UPDATING. No listing of make .. and so on. The files GENERIC and LINT contain support for ST506 ISA IDE and nothing for for PCI based ata or ad, the ide drivers in 4.0. Has April Fools Day arrived early? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 5:26:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from scully.zoominternet.net (scully.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAA2737B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 05:26:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmmiller@cvzoom.net) Received: (qmail 16855 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2001 13:19:41 -0000 Received: from acs-24-154-35-251.zoominternet.net (HELO cvzoom.net) (24.154.35.251) by scully.zoominternet.net with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 13:19:41 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB608F0.9A198D1A@cvzoom.net> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:26:08 -0500 From: Donn Miller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kstewart@urx.com Cc: Michel Boucey , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't make buildworld References: <3AB5F209.499F0619@urx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kent Stewart wrote: > It would appear that you have done something wrong but I don't have a > clue what it could be. How did you setup cvsup and how is your system > configured. Perhaps someone will have an idea of what is wrong. Just a shot in the dark, but he may have had /usr/src mounted on a FAT filesystem. > > > Michel Boucey wrote: > > > > I'm on FreeBSD 4.1.I've download stable sources and during the make > > > > buildworld, that's stop in kdump compilation : > > > > > > > > awk: In file included from newline in string #include > > > source line 1:^M > > > > ^M To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 5:34:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from normanet.org (ACaen-101-2-1-7.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.7.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 731AD37B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 05:34:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.boucey@normanet.fr) Received: (qmail 24721 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 13:36:22 -0000 Received: from by nux2.normanet.org with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.062843 secs); 19/03/2001 14:36:22 Received: from daemon.normanet.org (192.168.1.114) by normanet.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 13:36:22 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:41:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Michel Boucey X-Sender: mic@daemon.normanet.org To: Donn Miller Cc: kstewart@urx.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't make buildworld In-Reply-To: <3AB608F0.9A198D1A@cvzoom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have only ufs system files on this machine ... I've just made as '19.4.6.2 Saving the output' in HandBook said, and synchronize my sources from cvsup.FreeBSD.org ... Cordialement, Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Donn Miller wrote: > Kent Stewart wrote: >=20 > > It would appear that you have done something wrong but I don't have a > > clue what it could be. How did you setup cvsup and how is your system > > configured. Perhaps someone will have an idea of what is wrong. >=20 > Just a shot in the dark, but he may have had /usr/src mounted on a FAT > filesystem. =20 >=20 > > > > Michel Boucey wrote: >=20 > > > > > I'm on FreeBSD 4.1.I've download stable sources and during the ma= ke > > > > > buildworld, that's stop in kdump compilation : > > > > > > > > > > awk: In file included from newline in string #include > > > > source line 1:^M > > > > > ^M >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 5:49:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from normanet.org (ACaen-101-2-1-7.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.7.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B282D37B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 05:49:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.boucey@normanet.fr) Received: (qmail 24762 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 13:51:56 -0000 Received: from by nux2.normanet.org with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.063499 secs); 19/03/2001 14:51:56 Received: from daemon.normanet.org (192.168.1.114) by normanet.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 13:51:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:57:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Michel Boucey X-Sender: mic@daemon.normanet.org To: Donn Miller Cc: kstewart@urx.com, Michel Boucey , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: can't make buildworld In-Reply-To: <3AB608F0.9A198D1A@cvzoom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I forget to say that I'm only following the 'Using make world' page from=20 HandBook, and perhaps there's now a different way for doing ... Cordialement, Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Donn Miller wrote: > Kent Stewart wrote: >=20 > > It would appear that you have done something wrong but I don't have a > > clue what it could be. How did you setup cvsup and how is your system > > configured. Perhaps someone will have an idea of what is wrong. >=20 > Just a shot in the dark, but he may have had /usr/src mounted on a FAT > filesystem. =20 >=20 > > > > Michel Boucey wrote: >=20 > > > > > I'm on FreeBSD 4.1.I've download stable sources and during the ma= ke > > > > > buildworld, that's stop in kdump compilation : > > > > > > > > > > awk: In file included from newline in string #include > > > > source line 1:^M > > > > > ^M >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 7:13:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344FC37B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:13:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2JFDcg58438 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:13:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:13:38 -0500 (EST) From: Doug Denault X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.2 rc.shutdown Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there some documentation on what whould be done? It would seems something like: ... [ "x$1" = "xstop" ]; then kill -? If the kill does not work, is shutdown timing out each stop or should the rc.d script do this? Doug Denault doug@safeport.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 7:35:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from D00015.dialonly.kemerovo.su (D00015.dialonly.kemerovo.su [213.184.66.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2051A37B71B for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:35:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@D00015.dialonly.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by D00015.dialonly.kemerovo.su (8.11.2/8.11.0) id f2JFWGl01476 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:32:16 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:32:15 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: make release needs too much ports installed Message-ID: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> Reply-To: eugen@iname.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! I run mirror of FreeBSD CVS Repository and trying to 'make release'. I've read FAQ (btw, it still mentions src-secure, is it correct?). I run 3.5-STABLE here and so I decided to make 3.5-STABLE for first time. I've built world using 3.5-STABLE sources and run 'make release' with RELEASETAG=RELENG_3. I noticed that it installs some ports (my ports tree is fresh), f.e. docproj. Ok, I understand, but docproj depends of eps2png and eps2png depends of ghostscript. I've set JADETEX=no to avoid building of TeX, but still cannot get rid of ghostscript. Does one REALLY need to build and install ghostscript just to build FreeBSD release? Eugene To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 7:38:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAC237B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:38:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f2JFcP125605; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:38:25 -0800 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:38:25 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Myron Harvey Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stable-supfile Message-ID: <20010319073825.B22746@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <3AB60927.990776F1@qwest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3AB60927.990776F1@qwest.net>; from mharvey@qwest.net on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 06:27:03AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 06:27:03AM -0700, Myron Harvey wrote: > I cleaned out /usr/src/ in a running Cdrom distribution of FreeBSD 4.0 > and cvsuped stable-supfile. The file /usr/src/UPDATING contains only > one instruction.. Read /usr/src/UPDATING. No listing of make .. and so > on. >=20 > The files GENERIC and LINT contain support for ST506 ISA IDE and nothing > for for PCI based ata or ad, the ide drivers in 4.0. I'll bet you just cvsup'd 3-STABLE. The stable-supfile shipped with 4.0 incorrectly contained the following line: *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_3 You need to change it to: *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_4 -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6tifxXY6L6fI4GtQRAsoYAKCc6jGcl+x/eouDNaHkULpHMRa/vwCfcOXI nQ8uoc6qhytq/h3ZwUbdT8Y= =DLfC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 7:44:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A3137B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:44:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cdf.lists@fxp.org) Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id C14BE1360C; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:44:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:44:06 -0500 From: Chris Faulhaber To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release needs too much ports installed Message-ID: <20010319104406.A19463@peitho.fxp.org> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber , Eugene Grosbein , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com>; from eugen@iname.com on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:32:15PM +0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:32:15PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Hi! >=20 > I run mirror of FreeBSD CVS Repository and trying to 'make release'. > I've read FAQ (btw, it still mentions src-secure, is it correct?). > I run 3.5-STABLE here and so I decided to make 3.5-STABLE for first time. > I've built world using 3.5-STABLE sources and run 'make release' > with RELEASETAG=3DRELENG_3. I noticed that it installs some ports=20 > (my ports tree is fresh), f.e. docproj. Ok, I understand, but > docproj depends of eps2png and eps2png depends of ghostscript. > I've set JADETEX=3Dno to avoid building of TeX, but still cannot get rid = of=20 > ghostscript. Does one REALLY need to build and install ghostscript > just to build FreeBSD release?=20 >=20 No. You do not have to build the docs (and their dependent ports). See /usr/src/release/Makefile: # Uncomment this to disable the doc.1 target. It is also an ERROR # to set NOPORTS and not set NODOC since docs depend on ports. #NODOC=3D YES #NOPORTS=3D YES --=20 Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: FreeBSD: The Power To Serve iEYEARECAAYFAjq2KUYACgkQObaG4P6BelC/kgCgkaWIDQhXv4cK1hdweBo0fF0S CvsAn08cLD85m4oJFZra9JHTDyYGgCc1 =ANKC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 7:52:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from Mail6.nc.rr.com (fe6.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEDD37B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:52:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bts@babbleon.org) Received: from babbleon.org ([66.26.250.181]) by Mail6.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:38:05 -0500 Message-ID: <3AB52A9C.53D6D7F7@babbleon.org> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:37:32 -0500 From: The Babbler Organization: None to speak of X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rich Morin Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports vs. packages... References: <3AB3C1C2.67E1AB9B@yahoo.com> <20010317125349.E22316@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010318194637.A10260@acc.umu.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Rich Morin wrote: > > At 7:46 PM +0100 3/18/01, Markus Holmberg wrote: > >Isn't there a small security advantage with building from source > >(compared to downloading packages from an untrusted party)? > > Access to the source code (and even a close examination of it) isn't > enough. See Ken Thompson's Turing Award lecture, "Reflections on > Trusting Trust": http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html A fascinating paper, but not really the point that he was making. He was saying that the ports do a checksum verification of the sources, which means that as long as you trust your ports (which you frequently do since they were on the installation CD), then you don't really *have* to trust your download mirrors that much 'cause the code is being verified against the trusted checksum. But if you download a package, they could have put anything in there and you have no trusted way to verify it if you don't trust the mirror in the first place. Of course, per Mr. Thompson's paper, if you can't trust your system initially then you can't trust any changes you make to the system because some pre-existing component (like the compiler) could have a trojan implanted that will defeat any subsequent security precautions your take. But the ports still do add a modium of security. Another advantage of ports: you have the source handy. Just yesterday I had a problem with mkisofs, and while a careful reading the man page might have shown me which of the sqazillion options I needed to use to make it happy, it took about mere minutes with the source code to find it. And if I hadn't been able to find a pre-existant option, I could have hacked the source to what I wanted. (Actually, that was my original intention but luckily I found there was already a handy option.) The easy access to prepackaged auto-installing source was one of the primary reasons I switched to FreeBSD in the first place myself. That said, I'm starting to use packages more & more for lots of things. -- "Brian, the man from babble-on" bts@babbleon.org Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 8:13:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from D00015.dialonly.kemerovo.su (www2.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAC337B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:13:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@D00015.dialonly.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by D00015.dialonly.kemerovo.su (8.11.2/8.11.0) id f2JGAaD02114; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:10:36 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:10:36 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Chris Faulhaber Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release needs too much ports installed Message-ID: <20010319231036.A2038@iname.com> Reply-To: eugen@iname.com References: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> <20010319104406.A19463@peitho.fxp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319104406.A19463@peitho.fxp.org>; from jedgar@fxp.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:44:06AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:44:06AM -0500, Chris Faulhaber wrote: > > I've built world using 3.5-STABLE sources and run 'make release' > > with RELEASETAG=RELENG_3. I noticed that it installs some ports > > (my ports tree is fresh), f.e. docproj. Ok, I understand, but > > docproj depends of eps2png and eps2png depends of ghostscript. > > I've set JADETEX=no to avoid building of TeX, but still cannot get rid of > > ghostscript. Does one REALLY need to build and install ghostscript > > just to build FreeBSD release? > > > > No. You do not have to build the docs (and their dependent ports). > See /usr/src/release/Makefile: > > # Uncomment this to disable the doc.1 target. It is also an ERROR > # to set NOPORTS and not set NODOC since docs depend on ports. > #NODOC= YES > #NOPORTS= YES Thank you. But my question was: is ghostscript really used while building docs? Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 9:23:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk [193.237.89.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504AB37B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:23:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2JGwv947183; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:58:57 GMT (envelope-from nik) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:58:57 +0000 From: Nik Clayton To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: Chris Faulhaber , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release needs too much ports installed Message-ID: <20010319165856.A47154@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> <20010319104406.A19463@peitho.fxp.org> <20010319231036.A2038@iname.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319231036.A2038@iname.com>; from eugen@iname.com on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:10:36PM +0700 Organization: FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:10:36PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Thank you. But my question was: is ghostscript really used while=20 > building docs? Yes. Specifically, to convert images from one format to another. I shall be revisiting this decision on the -doc mailing list. N --=20 FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjq2OswACgkQk6gHZCw343WPsACfQ8hABsAb/ey+eAGryAgSXLis 5yMAni75K1pW7YRaX8z/PoNDhP26OMm/ =vt8l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 10:10:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3986837B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:09:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 10576 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2001 18:09:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 18:09:57 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB64B75.E2BF9474@urx.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:09:57 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Boucey Cc: Donn Miller , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: can't make buildworld References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Michel Boucey wrote: > > I forget to say that I'm only following the 'Using make world' page from > HandBook, and perhaps there's now a different way for doing ... Actually, the Handbook in section 19.4.1 tells you to follow /usr/src/UPDATING if it is different and for 4-stable it is different. For updating over major changes such as 4.1 to 4-stable it is suggested that you follow the buildworld, build[install]kernel, boot to single user, installworld, and then run mergemaster. Kent > > Cordialement, > > Michel Boucey Administrateur Systčme > > Société Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Donn Miller wrote: > > > Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > > It would appear that you have done something wrong but I don't have a > > > clue what it could be. How did you setup cvsup and how is your system > > > configured. Perhaps someone will have an idea of what is wrong. > > > > Just a shot in the dark, but he may have had /usr/src mounted on a FAT > > filesystem. > > > > > > > Michel Boucey wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm on FreeBSD 4.1.I've download stable sources and during the make > > > > > > buildworld, that's stop in kdump compilation : > > > > > > > > > > > > awk: In file included from newline in string #include > > > > > source line 1:^M > > > > > > ^M > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 10:21:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gasper.reftech.co.uk (smtp.ref000000.enta.net [195.74.117.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B1737B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:21:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@reftech.co.uk) Received: from STEVE (steve.reftech.co.uk [10.0.0.6]) by gasper.reftech.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA04473 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:21:21 GMT (envelope-from steve@reftech.co.uk) From: "Steven Purdy" To: Subject: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:13:53 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG regards Steven Purdy Reference Technology Limited 1 & 2 Anker Court Bonehill Road Tamworth Staffordshire B78 3HP Tel: 01827 61666 Fax: 01827 61661 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 10:28:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rs3s4.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (rs3s4.datacenter.cha.cantv.net [200.44.32.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA36537B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:28:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jbolivar@cantv.net) Received: from cantv.net (rs15s4.datacenter.cha.cantv.net [200.44.32.170]) by rs3s4.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (8.10.2/8.10.2/2.0) with SMTP id f2JISOQ23805 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:28:24 -0400 Message-ID: <544720013119182824140@cantv.net> X-EM-Version: 5, 0, 0, 4 X-EM-Registration: #0080540810301A009D00 Reply-To: jbolivar@cantv.net X-ORIGINATOR-IP: 161.196.99.99 From: "jbolivar@cantv.net" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re: 4.3-BETA Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:28:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG When is the next FreeBSD-stable release???? Regards, JB ----------- Mensaje Original -------------- De: Haikal Saadh [wyldephyre2@yahoo.com] Para: Mike Meyer [mwm@mired.org], Francisco Reyes [fran@reyes.somos.net] Cc: Mike Meyer [mwm@mired.org], Haikal Saadh [wyldephyre2@yahoo.com], freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG] Asunto: Re: 4.3-BETA Fecha: 18/03/2001 23:23:56 Mensaje: --- Mike Meyer wrote: > Francisco Reyes types: > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Mike Meyer wrote: > > > Haikal Saadh types: > > > > > > > > --- Matthew Emmerton > wrote: > > > > > > What is a BETA system? Is it similiar to > CURRENT? > > > > > > > > > > Please search through the mailing list > archives > > > > > before asking questions. > > > > > This has been answered many times over the > last two > > > > > weeks. > > > > > Or maybe just read the FAQ > > > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/admin.html#dmin.html#RELEASE-CANDIDATE > >, > > > which makes it clear that the name changes just > identify what point of > > > the release cycle that particular snapshot of > -STABLE is at. > > I have seen several people tell Haikal to read the > FAQ, etc.... > > I really have to agree with him. I don't think > having a "Beta" label on > > what is defined in the handbook as "Stable" is a > good idea. > > > > By definition a "new user" to FreeBSD is someone > who doesn't know yet > > what are the right places to read/check. > > In that case, where did they find the information > needed to upgrade to > -STABLE? > > > I think responses like the ones he got are the > reason we consistantly over > > the years get views of sometimes been unfrienly to > new users. > > We're definitely friendlier to people who show > evidence of having done > some research themselves than to those who don't > show that evidence. > > Personally, I always provide a pointer to existing > documentation > rather than type it in myself. That saves me typing, > and the users > should learn about another valuable resource that > works faster than > the mail lists. > > Haikal wasn't asking for help, he was suggesting > inappropriate changes > to the system to try and help people who had gotten > past the newbie > stage - as demonstrated by managing to update to > -STABLE, getting > both userland and kernel - past a problem. > > > Perhaps a label of "Pre-Release" may be less > confusing. "Beta" sure gives > > the wrong impression. > > That suggestion isn't inappropriate. On the other > hand the label "-RC" > (release candidate) stil generates problems, so I'm > not sure it would > work. I suspect that *any* change in name will > generate "I tried to > get -STABLE, and got -FOO" messages. Not changing it > would make life > difficult for users who *wanted* to know they were > getting a BETA or > RC version. > > Possibly this information needs to go in the > handbook on tracking > -STABLE, rather than a FAQ. > Or a Comment in the example supfile saying "This Can Get A Beta Release If A Code Freeze Is In Effect" kinda thing? I read the handbook chapter on CVSUpping, as well as the bit in The Complete FreeBSD, but it really was an information overload, and I just ended up having a go with the given example supfile. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 10:28:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.retec.net (apollo.retec.net [207.99.22.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1B737B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:28:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kenm@icarz.com) Received: from newken (dhcp113.icarz.com [207.99.22.113]) by apollo.retec.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f2JINux13323 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:23:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <039d01c0b0a2$7544af40$711663cf@icarz.com> From: "Ken Menzel" To: Subject: RELNOTES.txt Update needed Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:28:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, The RELNOTES.TXT file of freebsd-stable (beta) states in the disk section that DPT V RAID controllers are not supported, when in fact they now are with the new asr0 driver (noted in HARDWARE.TXT). Support for DPT V, and VI as well as adaptec 2100,2200 and 2300 RAID cards. Is this something that can be updated for the new release? Thanks Ken ----------------------------------------------------- Ken Menzel ICQ# 9325188 www.icarz.com kenm@icarz.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 11:34:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from snarf.osdn.com (snarf.osdn.com [209.192.217.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C852737B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:34:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mij@osdn.com) Received: from guinness.osdn.com (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snarf.osdn.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2JJY8200552 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:34:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mij@osdn.com) Received: by guinness.osdn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7D6E0171; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:34:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:34:07 -0500 From: Jim Mock To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: SSH weirdness Message-ID: <20010319143407.C1886@guinness.osdn.com> Reply-To: mij@osdn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Howdy, I've been seeing some strange things happen with SSH over the past few days. Here's the background: My laptop has a script that starts an SSH tunnel to one of my other machines at boot. It uses the SSH2 protocol to connect so the process can be sent to the background without having to run an additional command on the remote end. On Saturday, I built world on the laptop, and started seeing the following message on the server end whenever I'd send a message over the tunnel (localhost's port 9595 is forwarded to remote's port 25): Mar 19 14:17:41 snarf sshd[341]: error: socket: Protocol not supported Mar 19 14:17:41 snarf /kernel: Mar 19 14:17:41 snarf sshd[341]: error: socket: Protocol not supported I thought maybe it was due to the fact that the remote end was a week or two older than the laptop. So I built world today on the remote side, and it's still happening. I don't recall this happening beforehand (I've been using the tunnel for about 2 weeks now), so I really have no clues where to even start looking. Both versions of ssh are OpenSSH 2.3.0. Any ideas? On a related note, I've been getting these recently too, but can't find any mention of the file in any ssh(d)-related man pages: Mar 19 14:12:55 snarf sshd[341]: WARNING: /etc/ssh/primes does not exist, using old prime Mar 19 14:12:55 snarf sshd[341]: Accepted publickey for relay from aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd port 1559 ssh2 Mar 19 14:13:07 snarf sshd[342]: Accepted password for jim from aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd port 1560 Anyone familiar with this? How can I generate the primes file, or how can I shut it up? Thanks, - jim -- - jim mock - O|S|D|N - open source development network - - http://www.freebsdzine.org/ - jim@freebsdzine.org - jim@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 12: 1:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from russmcmullin.com (ravenserv.russmcmullin.com [63.226.105.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28C937B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:01:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from russ@shrimpbait.com) Received: from ravenserv [63.226.105.108] by russmcmullin.com (SMTPD32-6.00) id A5691301BA; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:00:41 -0700 Message-ID: <006101c0b0af$4654ecb0$6c69e23f@russmcmullin.com> Reply-To: "russ" From: "russ" To: Subject: subscribe Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:00:40 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005E_01C0B074.99C84DF0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C0B074.99C84DF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C0B074.99C84DF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C0B074.99C84DF0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 12: 6: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from reiters.org (reiters.org [64.40.73.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9B037B71B for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:05:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from denny@reiters.org) Received: by reiters.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CA491D625; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:05:56 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:05:56 -0600 From: Dennis Reiter To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Dell Latitude C600 Message-ID: <20010319140556.B83749@reiters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I installed 4.2 Release from the CDs onto my Dell Latitude C600 this weekend, but I'm having troubles. I can't boot if I have a PCMCIA card inserted, or if I insert a card after booting up, the machine freezes. I successfully installed 4.2 onto an Inspiron 7500 and it runs like a champ. I mainly needed the Lucent Wavelan card to work and with a couple of wicontrol tweaks, it does. Here's snippets from dmesg of each machine. Has anybody else had these problems/ made it work? DMESG from the Inspiron 7500 (works) ==================================== npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 pcic-pci0: at device 4.0 on pci0 pcic-pci0: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [ring enable][speaker enable][pwr save][FUNC p ci int + CSC serial isa irq] pcic-pci1: at device 4.1 on pci0 pcic-pci1: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [ring enable][speaker enable][pwr save][FUNC p ci int + CSC serial isa irq] isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 DMESG from the Latitude C600 (locks up) ======================================= npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 pcic-pci0: irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci0 pcic-pci0: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [ring enable][speaker enable][FUNC pci int + C SC serial isa irq] pcic-pci1: irq 11 at device 3.1 on pci0 pcic-pci1: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [ring enable][speaker enable][FUNC pci int + C SC serial isa irq] isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 Thanks, Denny -- Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org Madison River Communications | reiterd@madisonriver.net www.scapegoats.org Always tell her she is beautiful. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 12: 6:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E6637B71C for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:06:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2JK5m003757; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:05:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: eugen@iname.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make release needs too much ports installed In-Reply-To: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> References: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010319120548Q.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:05:48 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just make release without the docs! NODOC=YES. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 12:15:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from search.sparks.net (search.sparks.net [208.5.188.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECA837B723 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:15:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmiller@sparks.net) Received: by search.sparks.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id A0F80DB31; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:16:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by search.sparks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925BDDB30 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:16:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:16:42 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: mpg123 weirdness with 4.3-BETA #2 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Over the weekend I upgraded hardware and software at the same time. I went from 4.1-stable to 4.3-BETA #2, and upgraded to a 1100 MHz T-bird mobo. Same genuine SB16 sound card. Before the upgrade, mpg123 running under gqmpeg gave the clean, clear sound. Now it's laced with static. The card and wires seem OK - xcdplayer plays CD's static free, it's only mp3 files with a problem. Ideas? Known t-bird problem? Thanks, --- David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 12:49:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com [171.70.157.152]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B2137B72B for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:48:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@cisco.com) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA05460; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:46:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f2JKlre07021; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:47:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200103192047.f2JKlre07021@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/19/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Martti Kuparinen , Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Different output from pkg_version In-Reply-To: References: Comments: In-reply-to Dag-Erling Smorgrav message dated "05 Mar 2001 21:08:42 +0100." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-74237873P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:47:53 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-74237873P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Martti Kuparinen writes: > > [...] > > The only solution for my problem might be to reinstall the port so that > > this ORIGIN-entry would be created. I haven't checked the source code > > so I'm not 100% sure but this seems right so far... > > Your analysis is correct. Note that bash won't work any differently if > you reinstall it, the only difference will be that pkg_version will be > better able to tell what version you have. (Sorry for the late reply, I'm working through a two-week email backlog.) DES is correct; the newer pkg_version (which uses the ORIGIN directive) is better able to make a determination about what's current. "up-to-date with index" in more recent versions of pkg_version is the equivalent of "up-to-date" in older versions (the ones that only checked the INDEX file). Martti, you didn't say why this was a problem for you...or was this just simple curiosity? Bruce. --==_Exmh_-74237873P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE6tnB42MoxcVugUsMRAiUFAJ43GZQlbMNdENYi7LjFyXiB3302XACePp1x 5lN27DzcJd019RPI3N4FZxc= =ukeM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-74237873P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 13: 4:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com [171.70.157.152]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D9D37B725 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:04:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@cisco.com) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-3.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA14379; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:03:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f2JL4BV12526; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:04:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200103192104.f2JL4BV12526@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/19/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Michiel Boland , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS_RSH in 4.3-BETA In-Reply-To: <20010314021315.A28976@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <20010314021315.A28976@mollari.cthul.hu> Comments: In-reply-to Kris Kennaway message dated "Wed, 14 Mar 2001 02:13:15 -0800." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-67907690P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:04:10 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-67907690P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:00:00AM +0100, Michiel Boland wrote: > > Somewhere between 4.2 and 4.3, someone changed the default for CVS_RSH to > > 'ssh'. This does not appear to be documented anywhere. The info file still > > says that 'rsh' is the default. Can the docs be fixed? Or a line added to > > RELNOTES.TXT? I'm pretty sure this is going to bite a lot of people. > > It should be added to RELNOTES.TXT once the relevant committer > (preferably the person who merged the change) gets off his proverbial > and adds it. Can you submit a patch against the info file? The change to RELNOTES.TXT is awaiting approval for a commit (and I just got approval as I was typing this). I once thought of doing the info file, but I won't have time. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-67907690P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE6tnRK2MoxcVugUsMRAtlaAJsFzG+NRF370VKjM3Jb1Hy8Lt+WuwCdHqCP 0249glSRwyf26M5g33Ux3vA= =dDzB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-67907690P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 13:11:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (grouter.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB3737B71F for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:11:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (root@gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.133]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2JLAmf33592; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:10:51 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200103192110.f2JLAmf33592@gratis.grondar.za> To: "Matthew Emmerton" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Perl 5.6 merged soon? References: <005d01c0af70$05d1fe20$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <005d01c0af70$05d1fe20$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> ; from "Matthew Emmerton" "Sun, 18 Mar 2001 00:55:13 EST." Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:11:54 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I've got a tarball of the port skeleton at > http://www.gsicomp.on.ca/oss/perl560.tar for anyone who wants to take a > look. Please let me know of any problems (or enhancements) that it needs. > [ I haven't looked at the -pthreads / -lc_r issue yet. ] Once it goes > through the paces I'll make it into a PR and convince a committer to work > their magic. I'm looking at this now. M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 13:57:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com [171.69.43.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A035937B73B for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:57:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@cisco.com) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA06503; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:57:37 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f2JLvGP99558; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:57:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200103192157.f2JLvGP99558@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/19/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Ken Menzel" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELNOTES.txt Update needed In-Reply-To: <039d01c0b0a2$7544af40$711663cf@icarz.com> References: <039d01c0b0a2$7544af40$711663cf@icarz.com> Comments: In-reply-to "Ken Menzel" message dated "Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:28:56 -0500." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-61970276P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:57:16 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-61970276P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, "Ken Menzel" wrote: > Hi, The RELNOTES.TXT file of freebsd-stable (beta) states in the > disk section that DPT V RAID controllers are not supported, when in > fact they now are with the new asr0 driver (noted in HARDWARE.TXT). > Support for DPT V, and VI as well as adaptec 2100,2200 and 2300 RAID > cards. Is this something that can be updated for the new release? For what architecture? My copy of the i386 release notes for RELENG_4 show that the DPT V and VI are supported, as well as the Adaptec 1400, 2100S, 3200S, and 3400S SCSI RAID controllers. The alpha release notes don't reflect this because, to the best of my knowledge, this hardware either isn't supported or hasn't been tested. (Mike Smith's RAID controller page says that they're not supported.) Does this match your view of the world, and if not, can you give me some more data to help me Do The Right Thing (TM)? Thanks, Bruce. --==_Exmh_-61970276P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE6toC82MoxcVugUsMRApZ9AJ0Rmmb6yAooT7ZhH47kp8pFVmlkaQCg0N8P fQ5BYRHmU3vHwpS2aohCows= =3rzM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-61970276P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 14:18:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.jetnet.co.uk (www.jetnet.co.uk [62.172.71.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC3637B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:18:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dreid@jetnet.co.uk) Received: from godzilla (host217-32-124-114.hg.mdip.bt.net [217.32.124.114]) (authenticated) by www.jetnet.co.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2JMGvB23475 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:16:57 GMT Message-ID: <014801c0b0c1$62e81ed0$011aa8c0@godzilla> From: "David Reid" To: Subject: microcputime? Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:10:16 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Booted this evening on my laptop and now I'm getting warnings that microcputime went backwards? What gives and why would it start suddenly when it was OK at 2pm this afternoon? david To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 14:23:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E94437B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:23:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 14f83F-000BuF-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:22:57 +0000 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2JMMvw19950; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:22:57 GMT (envelope-from jcm) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:22:56 +0000 From: j mckitrick To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BETA induced nervousness Message-ID: <20010319222256.A19925@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20010316214210.5a3dc591.steveo@eircom.net> <20010316205259.B34966@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from des@ofug.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 03:04:54AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 03:04:54AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: | j mckitrick writes: | > Sounds good to me. It would cut the s/n ratio. | | I really hope you meant the reverse :) Ah, of course! :) jm -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathon McKitrick -- jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org "It took the computing power of three C-64s to fly to the Moon. It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here." --------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 14:36:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C6637B71B for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:36:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from cascade (cascade.veldy.net [64.1.117.29]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A66ABA32; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:34:47 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <000e01c0b0c4$bb9a15d0$1d750140@cascade> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: "David Reid" Cc: References: <014801c0b0c1$62e81ed0$011aa8c0@godzilla> Subject: Re: microcputime? Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:34:17 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Seems to be a problem with FreeBSD and APM on VIA chipsets. Are you using this combination? Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Reid" To: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:10 PM Subject: microcputime? > Booted this evening on my laptop and now I'm getting warnings that > microcputime went backwards? What gives and why would it start suddenly > when it was OK at 2pm this afternoon? > > david > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 16:14:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.jetnet.co.uk (www.jetnet.co.uk [62.172.71.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB31637B71E for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:14:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dreid@jetnet.co.uk) Received: from godzilla (host217-32-124-114.hg.mdip.bt.net [217.32.124.114]) (authenticated) by www.jetnet.co.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2K0C0B24305 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:12:00 GMT Message-ID: <01f401c0b0d1$75680a60$011aa8c0@godzilla> From: "David Reid" To: Subject: ceil and floor? Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:05:10 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm running into problems in GTK+ with these symbols not being defined. Both -lm and -lc_r are being passed to the linker, so I'm at a loss to explain why they're being missed. Any ideas? BTW, should we still be using -pthread for a threaded build? david To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 16:16:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dnvrpop1.dnvr.uswest.net (dnvrpop1.dnvr.uswest.net [206.196.128.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0507137B71C for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:16:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mharvey@qwest.net) Received: (qmail 21159 invoked by uid 0); 20 Mar 2001 00:14:05 -0000 Received: from iidialup187.dnvr.uswest.net (HELO qwest.net) (216.160.137.187) by dnvrpop1.dnvr.uswest.net with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 00:14:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:16:12 -0700 Message-ID: <3AB6A14C.2D46435D@qwest.net> From: "Myron Harvey" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re:stable-supfile Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks for the prompt response, solved the problem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 16:51:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EBB37B735 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:51:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2K0pl911032; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:51:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200103200051.f2K0pl911032@harmony.village.org> To: Pierre-Gilles Mialon Subject: Re: No ping reponse on pccard Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:56:17 +0100." <984322577.3aab92117f3f8@imp.free.fr> References: <984322577.3aab92117f3f8@imp.free.fr> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:51:47 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <984322577.3aab92117f3f8@imp.free.fr> Pierre-Gilles Mialon writes: : I have a network at home and since I upgrade to stable 4.3beta, : my Netgear FA410 TXC doesn't answer on the icmp request. I can : nmap localhost from the computer itself but I cannot ping or ssh it The FA410 needs hacks to the ed driver that haven't been MFC'd. There's a program called fa-select that will work around the problem until that can be corrected. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 17:41:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail8.nc.rr.com (fe8.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BF737B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:41:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bts@babbleon.org) Received: from babbleon.org ([66.26.250.181]) by mail8.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:30:47 -0500 Message-ID: <3AB6B34F.918313CB@babbleon.org> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:33:03 -0500 From: The Babbler Organization: None to speak of X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jbolivar@cantv.net Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA References: <544720013119182824140@cantv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD-stable doesn't have releases as such, does it? That is, if you cvsup you get the stable track as it exists that minute. It's *called* "stable" most of the time; as a release gets close, it is renamed BETA and then RC (release candidate), until the day it's truly officially blessed and it is named RELEASE and that version number is frozen. The next day (probably the same minute, actually), the label gets switched back to STABLE and the version number is incremented by one. Regardless of the label, though, it's exactly the same animal. Thus, after 4.2-RELEASE, we got 4.3-STABLE, which is now 4.3-BETA and will become 4.3-RC, and finally the same code base will be frozen into 4.3-RELEASE, at which time 4.4-STABLE will come into existance. "jbolivar@cantv.net" wrote: > > When is the next FreeBSD-stable release???? > > Regards, > > JB > > ----------- Mensaje Original -------------- > > De: Haikal Saadh [wyldephyre2@yahoo.com] > Para: Mike Meyer [mwm@mired.org], Francisco Reyes [fran@reyes.somos.net] > Cc: Mike Meyer [mwm@mired.org], Haikal Saadh [wyldephyre2@yahoo.com], > freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG] > Asunto: Re: 4.3-BETA > Fecha: 18/03/2001 23:23:56 > Mensaje: > > > > --- Mike Meyer wrote: > > Francisco Reyes types: > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Mike Meyer wrote: > > > > Haikal Saadh types: > > > > > > > > > > --- Matthew Emmerton > > wrote: > > > > > > > What is a BETA system? Is it similiar to > > CURRENT? > > > > > > > > > > > > Please search through the mailing list > > archives > > > > > > before asking questions. > > > > > > This has been answered many times over the > > last two > > > > > > weeks. > > > > > > > Or maybe just read the FAQ > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/admin.html#dmin.html#RELEASE-CANDIDATE > > >, > > > > which makes it clear that the name changes just > > identify what point of > > > > the release cycle that particular snapshot of > > -STABLE is at. > > > I have seen several people tell Haikal to read the > > FAQ, etc.... > > > I really have to agree with him. I don't think > > having a "Beta" label on > > > what is defined in the handbook as "Stable" is a > > good idea. > > > > > > By definition a "new user" to FreeBSD is someone > > who doesn't know yet > > > what are the right places to read/check. > > > > In that case, where did they find the information > > needed to upgrade to > > -STABLE? > > > > > I think responses like the ones he got are the > > reason we consistantly over > > > the years get views of sometimes been unfrienly to > > new users. > > > > We're definitely friendlier to people who show > > evidence of having done > > some research themselves than to those who don't > > show that evidence. > > > > Personally, I always provide a pointer to existing > > documentation > > rather than type it in myself. That saves me typing, > > and the users > > should learn about another valuable resource that > > works faster than > > the mail lists. > > > > Haikal wasn't asking for help, he was suggesting > > inappropriate changes > > to the system to try and help people who had gotten > > past the newbie > > stage - as demonstrated by managing to update to > > -STABLE, getting > > both userland and kernel - past a problem. > > > > > Perhaps a label of "Pre-Release" may be less > > confusing. "Beta" sure gives > > > the wrong impression. > > > > That suggestion isn't inappropriate. On the other > > hand the label "-RC" > > (release candidate) stil generates problems, so I'm > > not sure it would > > work. I suspect that *any* change in name will > > generate "I tried to > > get -STABLE, and got -FOO" messages. Not changing it > > would make life > > difficult for users who *wanted* to know they were > > getting a BETA or > > RC version. > > > > Possibly this information needs to go in the > > handbook on tracking > > -STABLE, rather than a FAQ. > > > > Or a Comment in the example supfile saying "This Can > Get A Beta Release If A Code Freeze Is In Effect" > kinda thing? > > I read the handbook chapter on CVSUpping, as well as > the bit in The Complete FreeBSD, but it really was an > information overload, and I just ended up having a go > with the given example supfile. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- "Brian, the man from babble-on" bts@babbleon.org Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents. Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 17:45:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dataloss.net (massive.dataloss.net [212.189.232.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7028537B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:45:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@dataloss.net) Received: (qmail 10659 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Mar 2001 01:35:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:35:33 +0100 From: Peter van Dijk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010320023533.A292@dataloss.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <544720013119182824140@cantv.net> <3AB6B34F.918313CB@babbleon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AB6B34F.918313CB@babbleon.org>; from bts@babbleon.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:33:03PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:33:03PM -0500, The Babbler wrote: > Thus, after 4.2-RELEASE, we got 4.3-STABLE, which is now 4.3-BETA and > will become 4.3-RC, and finally the same code base will be frozen into > 4.3-RELEASE, at which time 4.4-STABLE will come into existance. Almost. 4.2-RELEASE started 4.2-STABLE, just as 4.3-RELEASE will start 4.3-STABLE. Note that cvs-wise, only 4-STABLE exists. We just call everything after 4.3-RELEASE in 4-STABLE, 4.3-STABLE. Greetz, Peter -- dataloss networks '/ignore-ance is bliss' - me 'Het leven is een stuiterbal, maar de mijne plakt aan t plafond!' - me To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 17:46:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dataloss.net (massive.dataloss.net [212.189.232.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8AFD37B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:46:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@dataloss.net) Received: (qmail 10960 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Mar 2001 01:36:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:36:42 +0100 From: Peter van Dijk To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: weird bug with vn Message-ID: <20010320023642.B292@dataloss.net> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I basically did: # vnconfig vn0 /tmp/wuh.flp # mount /dev/vn0c /tmp I then was unable to find any way out of this catch-22 except rebooting, which is what I did. No time to investigate more deeply right now. Is this a known bug/problem? Greetz, Peter -- dataloss networks '/ignore-ance is bliss' - me 'Het leven is een stuiterbal, maar de mijne plakt aan t plafond!' - me To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 17:48: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C662337B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:47:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2K1lkW16824; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:47:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:47:46 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Peter van Dijk Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: weird bug with vn Message-ID: <20010319174746.E29888@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010320023642.B292@dataloss.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010320023642.B292@dataloss.net>; from peter@dataloss.net on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:36:42AM +0100 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Peter van Dijk [010319 17:46] wrote: > I basically did: > # vnconfig vn0 /tmp/wuh.flp > # mount /dev/vn0c /tmp > > I then was unable to find any way out of this catch-22 except rebooting, > which is what I did. > > No time to investigate more deeply right now. Is this a known > bug/problem? uh.. umount /tmp didn't work? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 17:48:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailf.telia.com (mailf.telia.com [194.22.194.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E85D37B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:48:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from d1o913.telia.com (d1o913.telia.com [195.252.44.241]) by mailf.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA17954 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:48:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from ertr1013.student.uu.se (h35n2fls20o913.telia.com [212.181.163.35]) by d1o913.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id CAA16536 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:48:28 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 1125 invoked by uid 1001); 20 Mar 2001 01:48:38 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:48:37 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: The Babbler Cc: jbolivar@cantv.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010320024837.A1109@student.uu.se> Mail-Followup-To: The Babbler , jbolivar@cantv.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <544720013119182824140@cantv.net> <3AB6B34F.918313CB@babbleon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AB6B34F.918313CB@babbleon.org>; from bts@babbleon.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:33:03PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:33:03PM -0500, The Babbler wrote: > > FreeBSD-stable doesn't have releases as such, does it? > > That is, if you cvsup you get the stable track as it exists that minute. > > It's *called* "stable" most of the time; > as a release gets close, it is renamed BETA and then RC (release > candidate), > until the day it's truly officially blessed and it is named RELEASE and > that version number is frozen. > The next day (probably the same minute, actually), the label gets > switched back to STABLE and the version number is incremented by one. > > Regardless of the label, though, it's exactly the same animal. > > Thus, after 4.2-RELEASE, we got 4.3-STABLE, which is now 4.3-BETA and > will become 4.3-RC, and finally the same code base will be frozen into > 4.3-RELEASE, at which time 4.4-STABLE will come into existance. Basically yes. A release is just a snapshot of the -stable (or, sometimes, -current) branch at a particular point in time. You got the order a bit wrong though. It is 4.2-RELEASE, 4.2-STABLE, 4.3-BETA, 4.3-RC, 4.3-RELASE, 4.3-STABLE, etc. > > > "jbolivar@cantv.net" wrote: > > > > When is the next FreeBSD-stable release???? > > > > Regards, > > > > JB > > 4.3-RELEASE is scheduled for Mar. 25 It might be slightly later though. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 17:52: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dataloss.net (massive.dataloss.net [212.189.232.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAB0F37B71D for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:52:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@dataloss.net) Received: (qmail 11935 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Mar 2001 01:42:57 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:42:57 +0100 From: Peter van Dijk To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: weird bug with vn Message-ID: <20010320024257.C292@dataloss.net> Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010320023642.B292@dataloss.net> <20010319174746.E29888@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319174746.E29888@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:47:46PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:47:46PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Peter van Dijk [010319 17:46] wrote: > > I basically did: > > # vnconfig vn0 /tmp/wuh.flp > > # mount /dev/vn0c /tmp > > > > I then was unable to find any way out of this catch-22 except rebooting, > > which is what I did. > > > > No time to investigate more deeply right now. Is this a known > > bug/problem? > > uh.. > umount /tmp > didn't work? device in use, it said (probably because the vn0 image was in 'another' /tmp, the one I had before I mounted vn0c over /tmp). Greetz, Peter -- dataloss networks '/ignore-ance is bliss' - me 'Het leven is een stuiterbal, maar de mijne plakt aan t plafond!' - me To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 18: 8:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A1137B72B; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:08:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: from spike.unixfreak.org (spike [63.198.170.139]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E629E3E09; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:08:33 -0800 (PST) To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: peter@freebsd.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS_RSH in 4.3-BETA In-Reply-To: <200103192104.f2JL4BV12526@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>; from bmah@FreeBSD.ORG on "Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:04:10 -0800" Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:08:33 -0800 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010320020833.E629E3E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Bruce A. Mah" writes: > > [ docs need to mention that CVS_RSH is now `ssh' by default ] > > The change to RELNOTES.TXT is awaiting approval for a commit (and I > just got approval as I was typing this). I once thought of doing the > info file, but I won't have time. I have patches that add a small note to the info file (it has a sizable section on rsh-specific stuff that I didn't want to touch) and update the man page. The problem is that the info file (src/contrib/cvs/doc/cvs.texinfo) is still on the vendor branch. I've read enough flam^Wdiscussions about how evil it is to take stuff off the vendor branch to know better than to jump in and do it without asking. So, Peter, as the maintainer of cvs and a repo-meister, is the docs update worth taking the info file off the vendor branch? I think at least the man page update is since the man page is already off the vendor branch. Patch attached below. Regards Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org Index: doc/cvs.texinfo =================================================================== RCS file: /st/src/FreeBSD/src/contrib/cvs/doc/cvs.texinfo,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.10 diff -u -r1.1.1.10 cvs.texinfo --- doc/cvs.texinfo 2000/10/02 06:33:49 1.1.1.10 +++ doc/cvs.texinfo 2001/03/20 01:58:13 @@ -2134,6 +2134,14 @@ @subsection Connecting with rsh @cindex rsh +@emph{NOTE:} Since FreeBSD 4.3, the default transport +is @code{ssh}, not @code{rsh}. Some parts of this +subsection still apply, while others do not. In +general, since @code{ssh} is desgined to be a drop-in +replacement for @code{rsh}, it should be possible to +apply most of the information here with a little help +from the ssh(1) manual page. + CVS uses the @file{rsh} protocol to perform these operations, so the remote user host needs to have a @file{.rhosts} file which grants access to the local Index: man/cvs.1 =================================================================== RCS file: /st/src/FreeBSD/src/contrib/cvs/man/cvs.1,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 cvs.1 --- man/cvs.1 2000/10/02 06:43:55 1.16 +++ man/cvs.1 2001/03/20 01:58:13 @@ -2110,7 +2110,7 @@ remote shell command to use when starting a .B cvs server. If this variable is not set then -.` "rsh" +.` "ssh" is used. .TP .SM CVS_SERVER To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 19:10:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.lig.bellsouth.net (mail5.lig.bellsouth.net [205.152.0.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F61837B71C for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 19:10:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank_s@bellsouth.net) Received: from Cat.nina.org (adsl-78-160-210.gnv.bellsouth.net [216.78.160.210]) by mail5.lig.bellsouth.net (3.3.5alt/0.75.2) with ESMTP id WAA13419 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:09:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:09:44 -0500 (EST) From: Frank Seltzer X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Xircom Cardbus support Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just received a Dell Inspiron 4000 laptop with a Xircom Realport CardBus Ethernet 10/100 + Modem 56 model # RBEM56G-100. According to the release notes for 4.2, the "Xircom Realport card + modem" card is supported. Is this the same part? My machine will not boot with the card installed. It hangs right after displaying ppi0: on ppbus0 If I eject the card it prints pccard: card inserted, slot 0 and the boot continues. Any help to get this machine on the network is appreciated. BTW, it has an ATI Rage Mobility 128 video chipset. Anyone have X running on one of these? Frank To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 19:27:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from giroc.albury.net.au (giroc.albury.NET.AU [203.15.244.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39ADE37B720 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 19:27:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nicks@giroc.albury.net.au) Received: (from nicks@localhost) by giroc.albury.net.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2K3R5K94927; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:27:05 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:27:05 +1100 From: Nick Slager To: Frank Seltzer Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Xircom Cardbus support Message-ID: <20010320142705.A90624@albury.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from frank_s@bellsouth.net on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:09:44PM -0500 X-Homer: Whoohooooooo! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Frank Seltzer (frank_s@bellsouth.net): > I just received a Dell Inspiron 4000 laptop with a Xircom Realport CardBus > Ethernet 10/100 + Modem 56 model # RBEM56G-100. > > According to the release notes for 4.2, the "Xircom Realport card + modem" > card is supported. Is this the same part? My machine will not boot with > the card installed. It hangs right after displaying No, they are different cards. Cardbus cards aren't supported in FreeBSD 4.x. There is support in -CURRENT, but you need to understand what you're doing if that's the path you choose. See http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/current-stable.html > BTW, it has an ATI Rage Mobility 128 video chipset. Anyone have X running > on one of these? Yep, on XFree86 4. Regards, Nick -- Nick Slager | Quidquid latine dictum nicks@albury.net | sit, altum viditur. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 19:49:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chmod.ath.cx (CC2-1242.charter-stl.com [24.217.116.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D529937B735 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 19:49:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx) Received: by chmod.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7068AA90C; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:49:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:49:15 -0600 From: Andrew Hesford To: The Babbler Cc: jbolivar@cantv.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010319214915.A33199@cec.wustl.edu> References: <544720013119182824140@cantv.net> <3AB6B34F.918313CB@babbleon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AB6B34F.918313CB@babbleon.org>; from bts@babbleon.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:33:03PM -0500 X-Loop: Andrew Hesford Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG No... 4.2-RELEASE begat 4.2-STABLE. Until a few weeks ago, we were all running 4.2-STABLE. Now we run 4.3-BETA. Then comes 4.3-RC, and then 4.3-RELEASE. It is after this that 4.3-STABLE comes about. You won't see 4.4-STABLE until 4.4 has been released. On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:33:03PM -0500, The Babbler wrote: > Thus, after 4.2-RELEASE, we got 4.3-STABLE, which is now 4.3-BETA and > will become 4.3-RC, and finally the same code base will be frozen into > 4.3-RELEASE, at which time 4.4-STABLE will come into existance. -- Andrew Hesford ajh3@chmod.ath.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 19:55:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from reiters.org (reiters.org [64.40.73.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E44637B73B for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 19:55:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from denny@reiters.org) Received: by reiters.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B45C9D625; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:55:01 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:55:01 -0600 From: Dennis Reiter To: Frank Seltzer Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xircom Cardbus support Message-ID: <20010319215501.C86841@reiters.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.2i In-Reply-To: ; from frank_s@bellsouth.net on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:09:44PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This sounds like what I'm struggling with on a Latitude c600. What do the lines starting with 'pcic' in your dmesg say? X windows should work. I have 3.3.6 running on an Inspiron 7500 (shows up as ) and 4.0.3 running on the Latitude c600 thanks to Paul Richards (shows up as ) Quoting Frank Seltzer (frank_s@bellsouth.net): > I just received a Dell Inspiron 4000 laptop with a Xircom Realport CardBus > Ethernet 10/100 + Modem 56 model # RBEM56G-100. > > According to the release notes for 4.2, the "Xircom Realport card + modem" > card is supported. Is this the same part? My machine will not boot with > the card installed. It hangs right after displaying > > ppi0: on ppbus0 > > If I eject the card it prints > > pccard: card inserted, slot 0 > > and the boot continues. > > Any help to get this machine on the network is appreciated. > > BTW, it has an ATI Rage Mobility 128 video chipset. Anyone have X running > on one of these? > > Frank > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org Madison River Communications | reiterd@madisonriver.net www.scapegoats.org This sentence has cabbage six words. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 20:18:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (edgemaster.creighton.edu [147.134.107.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9912037B71A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:18:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smkelly@zombie.org) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C0C0298A1; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:18:05 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:18:05 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Uh oh? Message-ID: <20010319221805.A87429@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm running 4.2-STABLE from Jan 28 2001. Just a few minutes ago, I finished building world (NOT INSTALLING), and building kernel (also NOT INSTALLING). I haven't installed either, they are still in /usr/obj/ I just noticed some bad things happening, and I don't know what caused them or what they really mean: (260) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ vmstat vmstat: undefined symbols: _kmemstatistics _bucket _zlist (261) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ swapinfo swapinfo: undefined symbol: _numvnodes (262) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ dmesg|grep swap_pager swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 256,size 4096, error 22 swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 264,size 4096, error 22 swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 272,size 4096, error 22 swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 280,size 4096, error 22 swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 288,size 8192, error 22 swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 304,size 4096, error 22 ... Anybody have an idea at what just exploded? Nothing else appears to be broken. Oh wait, I just found another broken one: (267) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ top top: nlist failed (268) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ systat systat: nlist: can't find following symbols: _ccpu _fscale Also, on a completely different note... I'm going modular for my kernel that I'm building and I'd like modular sound. I use the new pcm driver, so do I load snd.ko, snd_pcm.ko, and snd_emu10k1.ko, or just the latter two? -- Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org For PGP key, send e-mail with subject "send pgp key" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 20:32:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aeon.invision.net (aeon.invision.net [206.112.34.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B416937B720 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:32:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from martini@invision.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aeon.invision.net (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f2K4UID63032 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:30:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from martini@invision.net) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:30:16 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Martini Reply-To: "Matthew E. Martini" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA In-Reply-To: <20010319214915.A33199@cec.wustl.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I've read the documentation, and I'm far from being a newbie (having been at this since 2.2.5) and I still think the terminology used is confusing. If I'm an admin who wants a solid, tested, dare I say stable, operating system to run in my production enviornment I would want to grab a codebase called "STABLE." If I'm a developer, or just having fun with FreeBSD and I WANT to live on the bleeding edge then I would grab a codebase named "CURRENT." But as Andrew as pointed out this is NOT the was FreeBSD works at all. The -STABLE code is updated every day and is anything but "stable" and the - -RELEASE branch doesn't change. To my mind this is all backwards. It's not really all that bad once you get used to it (I got used to the X11 people calling the workstation side the server and the big multiuser box you connect to the client), but it is far from intuitive. And while I agree that often times newbies don't RTFM, it is our duty to help them understand our quirks of terminology and not come down too hard on them for being newbies. In case you hadn't noticed the Linux crowd is propogating an inferior product at a faster pace then FreeBSD because it is easier/friendlier to the newbie! (ditto x2 for M$). Matt On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Andrew Hesford wrote: > No... 4.2-RELEASE begat 4.2-STABLE. Until a few weeks ago, we were all > running 4.2-STABLE. Now we run 4.3-BETA. Then comes 4.3-RC, and then > 4.3-RELEASE. It is after this that 4.3-STABLE comes about. > > You won't see 4.4-STABLE until 4.4 has been released. > __________________________ http://www.invision.net/ _______________________ Matthew E. Martini, PE InVision.com, Inc. (631) 543-1000 x104 Chief Technology Officer matt@invision.net (631) 864-8896 Fax _______________________________________________________________________pgp_ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.1i iQEVAwUBOrbc2GtXn16/JS7ZAQGPGAgAiLPsQdCR3X+huWtCL6NhQtb5nHl6/KDV JonmzjMCERLWn8v4H1YAO7ee91y2ytTEMgSRmYvVEjRLxv+wYucxGLfrx7kwSuaB uUK3YzKUVGVJxXmq1S9NIIySvbqT2lbJ3WgD+vLwCqp0mTTrGLEJ4qHDcFd8aEmJ Lh8JyF5Usm3p9xVHfLTfNOJvc7yHUJYEeUhzw3XyvCQI3fjjAOzD9Mv3ygpDwS/w oFLqnmoguBaVHitc+pwawgQJw/NsbqdRxPtVoeP5q6ZMjBxSK+K39Ldh7YJHFbzW H4+dsDawB+qSzIefNChTeSpFoYHLHdn9oVpkApDhIZKplcsev/zb6A== =OKdA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 20:53:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B882037B725 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:53:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 31264 invoked by uid 0); 20 Mar 2001 05:53:50 -0000 Received: from dsl1-160.dynacom.net (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 05:53:50 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB6E25E.F4F2FD6E@urx.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:53:50 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthew E. Martini" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matt Martini wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > I've read the documentation, and I'm far from being a newbie (having been at > this since 2.2.5) and I still think the terminology used is confusing. > > If I'm an admin who wants a solid, tested, dare I say stable, operating > system to run in my production enviornment I would want to grab a codebase > called "STABLE." > > If I'm a developer, or just having fun with FreeBSD and I WANT to live on > the bleeding edge then I would grab a codebase named "CURRENT." > > But as Andrew as pointed out this is NOT the was FreeBSD works at all. > > The -STABLE code is updated every day and is anything but "stable" and the > - -RELEASE branch doesn't change. To my mind this is all backwards. Not in my mind. The -release branch always has something wrong with it and it typically is never fixed. The fixes are added to -stable. It is just a function of whether it matters to you or not. To find them, all of us would have to install 4.x-beta, 4.x-rc, 4.x-release, and so on. That doesn't happen and the first really broad install always seems to find something. It my be a nit but it is still something. On the other, current is really bleeding edge and I don't want to spend my time debuging unfinished software. So, I don't run either current or -releases. I have 4 machines running 4.3-beta. Two can do really quick updates and the other two are much slower. The changes to -stable aren't always fixes. Sometimes they add something new in the middle. The massive changes to upgrade to a new release occur about every 4 months. You just follow stable and grab your changes in a quiet time. Kent > > It's not really all that bad once you get used to it (I got used to the X11 > people calling the workstation side the server and the big multiuser box > you connect to the client), but it is far from intuitive. > > And while I agree that often times newbies don't RTFM, it is our duty to > help them understand our quirks of terminology and not come down too hard on > them for being newbies. > > In case you hadn't noticed the Linux crowd is propogating an inferior > product at a faster pace then FreeBSD because it is easier/friendlier to the > newbie! (ditto x2 for M$). > > Matt > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Andrew Hesford wrote: > > > No... 4.2-RELEASE begat 4.2-STABLE. Until a few weeks ago, we were all > > running 4.2-STABLE. Now we run 4.3-BETA. Then comes 4.3-RC, and then > > 4.3-RELEASE. It is after this that 4.3-STABLE comes about. > > > > You won't see 4.4-STABLE until 4.4 has been released. > > > > __________________________ http://www.invision.net/ _______________________ > > Matthew E. Martini, PE InVision.com, Inc. (631) 543-1000 x104 > Chief Technology Officer matt@invision.net (631) 864-8896 Fax > _______________________________________________________________________pgp_ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 6.5.1i > > iQEVAwUBOrbc2GtXn16/JS7ZAQGPGAgAiLPsQdCR3X+huWtCL6NhQtb5nHl6/KDV > JonmzjMCERLWn8v4H1YAO7ee91y2ytTEMgSRmYvVEjRLxv+wYucxGLfrx7kwSuaB > uUK3YzKUVGVJxXmq1S9NIIySvbqT2lbJ3WgD+vLwCqp0mTTrGLEJ4qHDcFd8aEmJ > Lh8JyF5Usm3p9xVHfLTfNOJvc7yHUJYEeUhzw3XyvCQI3fjjAOzD9Mv3ygpDwS/w > oFLqnmoguBaVHitc+pwawgQJw/NsbqdRxPtVoeP5q6ZMjBxSK+K39Ldh7YJHFbzW > H4+dsDawB+qSzIefNChTeSpFoYHLHdn9oVpkApDhIZKplcsev/zb6A== > =OKdA > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 21: 9:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chmod.ath.cx (CC2-1242.charter-stl.com [24.217.116.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DBD37B72E for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:09:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx) Received: by chmod.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F2E78A90B; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:09:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:09:02 -0600 From: Andrew Hesford To: Matt Martini Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010319230902.A90772@cec.wustl.edu> References: <20010319214915.A33199@cec.wustl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from martini@invision.net on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:30:16PM -0500 X-Loop: Andrew Hesford Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is not what I pointed out. -CURRENT is what you get for the bleeding edge. -STABLE is what you get for stable code. The changes in -STABLE are minor and well-tested; in contrast, there is no guarantee that -CURRENT will even build on a given day. The big source of confusion on this list is the distinction between BETA, STABLE, RC and RELEASE. As long as people understand that all are the same code branch, there should be no trouble. I've been using FreeBSD for two months (coming from the Linux crowd), and I find nothing confusing about the nomenclature. All one needs to remember is that if your supfile says RELENG_4, you're stable... if it says ".", you're not. On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:30:16PM -0500, Matt Martini wrote: > If I'm an admin who wants a solid, tested, dare I say stable, operating > system to run in my production enviornment I would want to grab a codebase > called "STABLE." > > If I'm a developer, or just having fun with FreeBSD and I WANT to live on > the bleeding edge then I would grab a codebase named "CURRENT." > > But as Andrew as pointed out this is NOT the was FreeBSD works at all. -- Andrew Hesford ajh3@chmod.ath.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 21:16:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jason.argos.org (jason.argos.org [216.233.245.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB70537B734 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:16:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@jason.argos.org) Received: (from mike@localhost) by jason.argos.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f2K52dM32548; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:02:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:02:39 -0500 From: Mike Nowlin To: Matt Martini Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010320000239.A31887@argos.org> References: <20010319214915.A33199@cec.wustl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from martini@invision.net on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:30:16PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I've read the documentation, and I'm far from being a newbie (having been= at > this since 2.2.5) and I still think the terminology used is confusing. >=20 > If I'm an admin who wants a solid, tested, dare I say stable, operating > system to run in my production enviornment I would want to grab a codebase > called "STABLE." =20 > The -STABLE code is updated every day and is anything but "stable" and the > - -RELEASE branch doesn't change. To my mind this is all backwards. I've been tracking 3- and 4-STABLE on around 30 machines (some started back= at 2.1), and they've been extremely solid. The trick is to not trust the fact that the word "STABLE" is in there - read the lists, and only CVSup/rebuild when you see a week or so of nobody posting major blowups that all seem to have a common set of symptoms. Maintain an in-house CVS mirror that only gets updated when you decide it's time, update a machine that isn't all that important off the mirror & run it for a few days, then update the rest of the machines off the same mirror time/date when you decide it's safe. I've been using this technique for several years, and the worst problem I've really run into was when the seldom-used parallel "geek port" code was broken... (Using it caused a panic on my play box - the one used to test -STABLE releases before applying the updates to the rest of the machine.) A couple hours of deciphering the new parallel port code ended up in a submitted patch that was tested on 5-CURRENT (and a couple of 4-STABLE test boxes) for a few weeks, but was only merged into 4-STABLE after successful testing -- that's the way this whole REL/STA/CUR thing is SUPPOSED to work... :) The biggest difference between -STABLE and -RELEASE is the fact that -RELEA= SE is just a snapshot of -STABLE at a particular time, but there is a code freeze period that essentially "forces" the above-mentioned "week or so (actually longer) of nobody posting major blowups". mike --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjq25G8ACgkQJol4I8h9Gd8ymQCdFpO4Zw+cbWoGW0AP3Ym8M4Rr dAgAni7le5JJtW8Q7r91CffyFy1iLcAy =yKfP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 21:55:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (edgemaster.creighton.edu [147.134.107.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD2937B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:55:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smkelly@zombie.org) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8CA53991A; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:53:14 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:53:14 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010319235314.A444@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there a limit to the number of modules one can load at boot time? I have a list of modules to load in loader.conf, I see loader load them, but then the kernel never mentions them in startup. loader.conf: userconfig_script_load="YES" # Load userconfig settings ### Modules # Network if_dc_load="YES" # NetGear FA310TX if_xl_load="YES" # 3Com 3c900B-TPO if_ppp_load="YES" # PPP # Filesystems msdos_load="YES" # FAT nfs_load="YES" # Network Filesystem procfs_load="YES" # Process filesystem # Sound snd_emu10k1_load="YES" # EMU10K1 driver # Misc. agp_load="YES" # Accelerated Graphics Port usb_load="YES" # Universal Serial Bus vn_load="YES" # Virtual Node support When I boot, I see them all loaded before kernel is started. But then in the bootup messages: FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #1: Mon Mar 19 22:15:45 CST 2001 root@edgemaster.zombie.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EDGEMASTER ... real memory = 134152192 (131008K bytes) avail memory = 126214144 (123256K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc037f000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc037f09c. Preloaded elf module "msdos.ko" at 0xc037f0ec. Preloaded elf module "nfs.ko" at 0xc037f18c. Preloaded elf module "procfs.ko" at 0xc037f228. Preloaded elf module "vn.ko" at 0xc037f2c8. Preloaded elf module "if_ppp.ko" at 0xc037f364. Preloaded elf module "if_dc.ko" at 0xc037f404. Preloaded elf module "miibus.ko" at 0xc037f4a4. Preloaded elf module "snd_emu10k1.ko" at 0xc037f544. link_elf: symbol sndbuf_getbps undefined Preloaded elf module "usb.ko" at 0xc037f5e8. Preloaded elf module "agp.ko" at 0xc037f684. VESA: v2.0, 32768k memory, flags:0x1, mode table:0xc00c6974 (c0006974) VESA: Matrox Graphics Inc. ... Notice it loads miibus.ko, which I don't even specify in loader.conf? This shows that loader is reading all the modules and adding their dependancies, but why isn't the kernel getting them all? -- Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org For PGP key, send e-mail with subject "send pgp key" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 21:56:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chmod.ath.cx (CC2-1242.charter-stl.com [24.217.116.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9520C37B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:56:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx) Received: by chmod.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1085CA90B; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:55:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:55:01 -0600 From: Andrew Hesford To: Mike Nowlin Cc: Matt Martini , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010319235501.A345@cec.wustl.edu> References: <20010319214915.A33199@cec.wustl.edu> <20010320000239.A31887@argos.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010320000239.A31887@argos.org>; from mike@argos.org on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:02:39AM -0500 X-Loop: Andrew Hesford Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You could do things this way. Or you could employ my method: As a college student, I have loads of free time that would be better spent studying for exams, and yet somehow is never used that way. When I have homework due in two days, I'd rather be doing something... anything... that doesn't have a due date. To fight the boredom of class, I prefer to cvsup whenever my uptime rivals that of impressive Windows boxes... say, 3 or 4 days. If nothing goes wrong, at least I've blown 10 minutes cvsup'ing, an hour rebuilding the world, 20 minutes installing it, and a few more for mergemaster. If something goes wrong, I can spend time fixing it. It's actually quite liberating... when I see all thost "Problem with buildworld!" messages, I just delete them en masse. As it were, I have never had trouble building the world, no matter how trouble-ridden the mailing lists have been. On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:02:39AM -0500, Mike Nowlin wrote: > I've been tracking 3- and 4-STABLE on around 30 machines (some started back at > 2.1), and they've been extremely solid. The trick is to not trust the fact > that the word "STABLE" is in there - read the lists, and only CVSup/rebuild > when you see a week or so of nobody posting major blowups that all seem to > have a common set of symptoms. Maintain an in-house CVS mirror that only > gets updated when you decide it's time, update a machine that isn't all that > important off the mirror & run it for a few days, then update the rest of > the machines off the same mirror time/date when you decide it's safe. > mike -- Andrew Hesford ajh3@chmod.ath.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 22:26:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ws130.nomadiclab.com (ws130.nomadiclab.com [195.165.196.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0727C37B723; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:26:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from martti.kuparinen@nomadiclab.com) Received: from ws140.nomadiclab.com (ws140.nomadiclab.com [195.165.196.140]) by ws130.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D0372543; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:26:34 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:26:34 +0200 (EET) From: Martti Kuparinen To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: Subject: Re: Different output from pkg_version In-Reply-To: <200103192047.f2JKlre07021@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > DES is correct; the newer pkg_version (which uses the ORIGIN directive) > is better able to make a determination about what's current. > "up-to-date with index" in more recent versions of pkg_version is the > equivalent of "up-to-date" in older versions (the ones that only checked > the INDEX file). > > Martti, you didn't say why this was a problem for you...or was this > just simple curiosity? No, it's not a problem. It was little bit irritating though as I'm running cvsup+pkg_version every night from cron to check my system... I "fixed" the situation by manually adding ORIGIN lines to /var/db/pkg/*/ so I see no more false alarms :-) Martti --- Martti Kuparinen http://www.iki.fi/~kuparine/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 22:59:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-28.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F6C37B740 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:59:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6198166BDE; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:59:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:59:10 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sean Kelly Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Uh oh? Message-ID: <20010319225910.A15322@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010319221805.A87429@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319221805.A87429@edgemaster.zombie.org>; from smkelly@zombie.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:18:05PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:18:05PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote: > (267) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ top > top: nlist failed This is a FAQ. Kris --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6tv++Wry0BWjoQKURAmOPAKDrRpaiHCS0a/xDQ4J2yMu92TASYgCgjp0b pOXPcxfz2PoNWWvVTfRxIEc= =8Klb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 23: 0:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-28.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7E937B740 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:00:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7E10466EA5; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:00:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:00:08 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sean Kelly Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010319230008.B15322@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010319235314.A444@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U+BazGySraz5kW0T" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319235314.A444@edgemaster.zombie.org>; from smkelly@zombie.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:53:14PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --U+BazGySraz5kW0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:53:14PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote: > Notice it loads miibus.ko, which I don't even specify in loader.conf? This > shows that loader is reading all the modules and adding their dependancies, > but why isn't the kernel getting them all? How do you know it's not? You haven't demonstrated this in your mail :-) Kris --U+BazGySraz5kW0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6tv/3Wry0BWjoQKURAsuqAKDwf1zel+cYdjpikV2vynNz1686hQCg0PYR PsOhW7wwT9l+tNs9K9UkikI= =BGTg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --U+BazGySraz5kW0T-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 23: 7:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F0D37B71B for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:07:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Received: from cfcl.com (cpe-24-221-169-54.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.169.54]) by idiom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA49107 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.168.205] (cerberus [192.168.168.205]) by cfcl.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2K76uV52656 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:06:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:52:30 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Rich Morin Subject: RE: installing X11 sources? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG FWIW, I never heard from anyone at Sprint Sunday or Monday. I'm not sure, but I will probably be home for most of Tuesday, in case you need to touch base. -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - home page, resume, etc. http://www.cfcl.com/Meta/md_fb.html - The FreeBSD Browser email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 23:35:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (edgemaster.creighton.edu [147.134.107.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B660A37B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:35:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smkelly@zombie.org) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1AD95991A; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:34:44 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:34:43 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: Kris Kennaway Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010320013443.A472@edgemaster.zombie.org> References: <20010319235314.A444@edgemaster.zombie.org> <20010319230008.B15322@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319230008.B15322@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:00:08PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:00:08PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:53:14PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote: > > Notice it loads miibus.ko, which I don't even specify in loader.conf? = This > > shows that loader is reading all the modules and adding their dependanc= ies, > > but why isn't the kernel getting them all? >=20 > How do you know it's not? You haven't demonstrated this in your mail :-) Okay, I copied down what I believe to be relevant, and now I'm really confused. It shows it loading initially, but it doesn't show up in 'lsmod' and it doesn't show up during kernel boot... FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 0.8 (root@edgemaster.zombie.org, Mon Mar 19 21:14:31 CST 2001) Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf /kernel text=3D0x12fb65 data=3D0x1cf7c+0x1c43c syms=3D0x4+0x23dc0+0x4+0x28a= b4] /modules/msdos.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... /modules/nfs.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... /modules/procfs.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... /modules/vn.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... /modules/if_ppp.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... /modules/if_dc.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... Loading required module 'miibus' /modules/miibus.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... /modules/if_xl.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... Loading required module 'miibus' /modules/snd_emu10k1.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... /modules/usb.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... /modules/agp.ko text=3D... data=3D... syms=3D... Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. Booting [kernel] in 9 seconds... Type '?' for a list of commands, or 'help' for more detailed information. ok lsmod =2E..: kernel (elf kernel, ...) =2E..: /boot/kernel.conf (userconfig_script, 0x0) =2E..: msdos.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: nfs.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: procfs.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: vn.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: if_ppp.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: if_dc.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: miibus.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: snd_emu10k1.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: usb.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: agp.ko (elf module, ...) ok load /modules/if_xl.ko /modules/if_xl.ko text=3D0x70af data=3D0x1f4+0x4 syms=3D[0x4+0xa60+0x4+0x7c= d] loading required module 'miibus' warning: module '/modules/if_xl.ko" already loaded ok lsmod =2E..: kernel (elf kernel, ...) =2E..: /boot/kernel.conf (userconfig_script, 0x0) =2E..: msdos.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: nfs.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: procfs.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: vn.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: if_ppp.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: if_dc.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: miibus.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: snd_emu10k1.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: usb.ko (elf module, ...) =2E..: agp.ko (elf module, ...) ok boot Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #1: Mon Mar 19 22:15:45 CST 2001 root@edgemaster.zombie.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EDGEMASTER Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (334.09-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0x651 Stepping =3D 1 Features=3D0x183f9ff real memory =3D 134152192 (131008K bytes) avail memory =3D 126214144 (123256K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc037f000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc037f09c. Preloaded elf module "msdos.ko" at 0xc037f0ec. Preloaded elf module "nfs.ko" at 0xc037f18c. Preloaded elf module "procfs.ko" at 0xc037f228. Preloaded elf module "vn.ko" at 0xc037f2c8. Preloaded elf module "if_ppp.ko" at 0xc037f364. Preloaded elf module "if_dc.ko" at 0xc037f404. Preloaded elf module "miibus.ko" at 0xc037f4a4. Preloaded elf module "snd_emu10k1.ko" at 0xc037f544. link_elf: symbol sndbuf_getbps undefined Preloaded elf module "usb.ko" at 0xc037f5e8. Preloaded elf module "agp.ko" at 0xc037f684. VESA: v2.0, 32768k memory, flags:0x1, mode table:0xc00c6974 (c0006974) VESA: Matrox Graphics Inc. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled apm0: on motherboard apm: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xd0000000-0xd3ffffff= at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 10 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on= pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 11 = at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered intpm0: port 0x5000-0x500f irq = 9 at device 7.3 on pci0 intpm0: I/O mapped 5000 intpm0: intr IRQ 9 enabled revision 0 smbus0: on intsmb0 smb0: on smbus0 intpm0: PM I/O mapped 4000=20 pci0: (vendor=3D0x10b7, dev=3D0x9004) at 15.0 irq 10 pci0: (vendor=3D0x1102, dev=3D0x0002) at 17.0 irq 11 pci0: (vendor=3D0x1102, dev=3D0x7002) at 17.1 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 fb0 at vga0 sc0: on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x200> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x278-0x27f irq 5 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppi0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port DUMMYNET initialized (010124) IP packet filtering initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enab= led, default to accept, unlimited logging IP Filter: v3.4.16 initialized. Default =3D pass all, Logging =3D enabled ad0: 4884MB [10585/15/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 ata1-master: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 compliant cable ad2: 19541MB [39703/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA33 acd0: CD-RW at ata0-slave using UDMA33 acd1: DVD-ROM at ata1-slave using WDMA2 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad2s1a If I then manually load it with kldload and then set it up with ifconfig, it works fine. What the hell? --=20 Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org For PGP key, send e-mail with subject "send pgp key" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 23:47:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFC937B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:47:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2K7jS913358; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:45:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200103200745.f2K7jS913358@harmony.village.org> To: Ian Dowse Subject: Re: suspend/restore with ppp connections Cc: j mckitrick , Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:40:58 GMT." <200103121440.aa97105@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> References: <200103121440.aa97105@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:45:28 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200103121440.aa97105@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Ian Dowse writes: : A workaround for the panic, I think, is to remove the card before : resuming if you accidentally suspend while ppp is running. sio's detach routine is a big hack and needs to be properly rewritten. sc->gone will always be 0 since once detach is called, the device is gone. The basic problem is that there's no way to "reference count" the device so that detach can sleep until the count goes to zero. We remove the device from a timeout context, which you can't sleep in. NEWCARD might be able to correct this. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 23:48:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975EB37B71C for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:48:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2K7lB913370; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:47:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200103200747.f2K7lB913370@harmony.village.org> To: j mckitrick Subject: Re: suspend/restore with ppp connections Cc: Ian Dowse , Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:56:22 GMT." <20010312145622.A87895@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20010312145622.A87895@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010312135826.F86948@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200103121440.aa97105@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:47:11 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010312145622.A87895@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> j mckitrick writes: : Now this is the kind of thing I would be interested in helping fix. But if : you say sio has bigger problems, I might be in over my head. What would : happen if I just added those tests for NULL? That might work. You might also check -current to see if there are unmerged changes. I thought I'd fixed the panics by having the detach routine effectively call close on everything. Maybe missed some. Generally you'd only need to check after sleeping. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 23:52:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from unicorn.blackhats.org (14dyn75.com21.casema.net [213.17.84.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13E537B71E for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:52:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from unicorn@blackhats.org) Received: by unicorn.blackhats.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 95C7412C0D; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:52:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:52:32 +0100 From: The Unicorn To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" , "nlfug@nlfug.nl" Subject: Re: Has anyone got a Libretto 110CT working with XFree86 4.0.2? Message-ID: <20010320085232.A49651@unicorn.blackhats.org> References: <20010317144338.Y49651@unicorn.blackhats.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from juha@saarinen.org on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:52:33AM +1200 X-Files: The Truth Is Out There! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Guys (F/M), Well, finally got my Libretto to use XFree86-4.0.3 again. Seems to be that it will only accept colordepth 24 (was previously 16). I have included my (minimized) XF86Config file below (excluding all modelines and screen subsections I have tried), so that others may try this and are succesful in a shorter time than I have been. Many thanks to everyone that reacted, you have at least made me continue my quest. ------%<----%<----%<----%<---- SNIP ----%<----%<----%<----%<----%<------ # See 'man XF86Config' for info on the format of this file Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "XFree86 Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled" # FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" # FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" EndSection Section "Module" Load "GLcore" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "pex5" Load "record" Load "xie" Load "freetype" Load "type1" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "keyboard" Option "XkbModel" "pc101" Option "XkbLayout" "us" Option "XkbOptions" "ctrl:nocaps" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/mouse" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "TOS" ModelName "5084" HorizSync 31.5-37.9 VertRefresh 50-90 ModeLine "800x480" 40.00 800 864 928 1088 480 481 484 509 +hsync EndSection Section "Device" Option "overrideValidateMode" Option "XaaNoScanlineImageWriteRect" Option "XaaNoScanlineCPUToScreenColorExpandFill" Identifier "Card0" Driver "neomagic" VendorName "Neomagic" BoardName "NM2160" BusID "PCI:0:4:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "800x480" ViewPort 0 0 EndSubSection EndSection Section "DRI" EndSection ------%<----%<----%<----%<---- SNIP ----%<----%<----%<----%<----%<------ Ciao, Unicorn. -- ======= _ __,;;;/ TimeWaster ================================================= ,;( )_, )~\| A Truly Wise Man Never Plays PGP: 64 07 5D 4C 3F 81 22 73 ;; // `--; Leapfrog With A Unicorn... 52 9D 87 08 51 AA 35 F0 ==='= ;\ = | ==== Youth is Not a Time in Life, It is a State of Mind! ======== Echelon Teasers: NSA CIA DIA FBI NRO KGB FAPSI FSB Mossad BVD MI5 MI6 GCHQ BND To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 23:52:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAC737B720 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:52:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2K7pP913420; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:51:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200103200751.f2K7pP913420@harmony.village.org> To: Ian Dowse Subject: Re: suspend/restore with ppp connections Cc: j mckitrick , Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:20:54 GMT." <200103121520.aa08765@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> References: <200103121520.aa08765@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:51:25 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200103121520.aa08765@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Ian Dowse writes: : You could try something like the patch below - I'm sure this isn't : the right way to fix this - the struct tty leaks will still happen : here. However it may be enough to avoids the page faults and make : suspend/resume while a pccard serial port is open a bit more : reliable. I did something very similar at one point, but bde didn't like it so I didn't commit it.... I didn't close the line discipline, however. That's a good touch. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 19 23:53: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-28.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B342D37B721 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:53:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4FD0B66BDE; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:53:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:53:00 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sean Kelly Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010319235300.A16082@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010319235314.A444@edgemaster.zombie.org> <20010319230008.B15322@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010320013443.A472@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010320013443.A472@edgemaster.zombie.org>; from smkelly@zombie.org on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 01:34:43AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 01:34:43AM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:00:08PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:53:14PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote: > > > Notice it loads miibus.ko, which I don't even specify in loader.conf?= This > > > shows that loader is reading all the modules and adding their dependa= ncies, > > > but why isn't the kernel getting them all? > >=20 > > How do you know it's not? You haven't demonstrated this in your mail := -) >=20 > Okay, I copied down what I believe to be relevant, and now I'm really > confused. It shows it loading initially, but it doesn't show up in 'lsmo= d' > and it doesn't show up during kernel boot... Okay, so what you're actually saying is that if you don't tell the loader to load miibus.ko (which is a required dependency of if_xl.ko), then if_xl.ko doesn't load properly even though it's registered as being loaded? It wasn't terribly clear in your initial mail what you claimed the problem was (everything else seems to be okay, at least at first glance). There may be some problem with module dependencies, I don't know. What happens if you explicitly load miibus in loader.conf? Kris --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6twxcWry0BWjoQKURAotRAKCqcSNOgs2QyYmqaqCjRjw668WFKwCg9ntP 8F8hhQcjpKgSWdugum9FuAE= =APfZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 0: 2:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (edgemaster.creighton.edu [147.134.107.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A42F37B726 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:02:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smkelly@zombie.org) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B4761991A; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:02:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:02:29 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: Kris Kennaway Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010320020229.A435@edgemaster.zombie.org> References: <20010319235314.A444@edgemaster.zombie.org> <20010319230008.B15322@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010320013443.A472@edgemaster.zombie.org> <20010319235300.A16082@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319235300.A16082@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:53:00PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:53:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Okay, so what you're actually saying is that if you don't tell the > loader to load miibus.ko (which is a required dependency of if_xl.ko), > then if_xl.ko doesn't load properly even though it's registered as > being loaded? It wasn't terribly clear in your initial mail what you No. My initial point was basically "It isn't loading everything it is supposed to be loading." I was simplifying the problem since I had a lack of information on the topic and wanted to see if anybody knew anything about it before I dug in deeper. > claimed the problem was (everything else seems to be okay, at least at > first glance). There may be some problem with module dependencies, I > don't know. What happens if you explicitly load miibus in > loader.conf? No matter whether I specify miibus or not in loader.conf, it still fails to load if_xl.ko even though it is registered. If, however, I remove if_dc.ko and miibus.ko from loader.conf, then if_xl.ko will load properly. It seems to me that the two modules (xl and dc) don't get along, or that there is some sort of limit to the number of modules it wants to load. --=20 Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org For PGP key, send e-mail with subject "send pgp key" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 0:11:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF27537B729 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:11:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2K87qg15969; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:07:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103200807.f2K87qg15969@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Sean Kelly Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:02:29 CST." <20010320020229.A435@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:07:52 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > No matter whether I specify miibus or not in loader.conf, it still fail= s to > load if_xl.ko even though it is registered. If, however, I remove if_d= c.ko > and miibus.ko from loader.conf, then if_xl.ko will load properly. It > seems to me that the two modules (xl and dc) don't get along, or that t= here > is some sort of limit to the number of modules it wants to load. I don't have a quick answer for your problem (yet), but I'd just like to = clarify that there aren't any limits like this. I *suspect* that what's happening is that the dependancy checking code is= = incorrectly not registering the if_xl module when it discovers that its = dependancy (miibus) is already loaded. You can verify this by reversing the load order, ie. loading if_xl first.= = If this results in if_dc disappearing, then we have a smoking gun. -- = =2E.. every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 0:19: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (edgemaster.creighton.edu [147.134.107.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1844837B734; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:18:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smkelly@zombie.org) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 18CF5991A; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:18:55 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:18:55 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: Mike Smith Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010320021855.A433@edgemaster.zombie.org> References: <20010320020229.A435@edgemaster.zombie.org> <200103200807.f2K87qg15969@mass.dis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103200807.f2K87qg15969@mass.dis.org>; from msmith@freebsd.org on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:07:52AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:07:52AM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: > > No matter whether I specify miibus or not in loader.conf, it still fails to > > load if_xl.ko even though it is registered. If, however, I remove if_dc.ko > > and miibus.ko from loader.conf, then if_xl.ko will load properly. It > > seems to me that the two modules (xl and dc) don't get along, or that there > > is some sort of limit to the number of modules it wants to load. > > I don't have a quick answer for your problem (yet), but I'd just like to > clarify that there aren't any limits like this. > > I *suspect* that what's happening is that the dependancy checking code is > incorrectly not registering the if_xl module when it discovers that its > dependancy (miibus) is already loaded. > > You can verify this by reversing the load order, ie. loading if_xl first. > If this results in if_dc disappearing, then we have a smoking gun. Your smoking gun just set itself on fire and burnt to death in a test run: (2) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ cat /boot/loader.conf ... # Network #miibus_load="YES" if_xl_load="YES" # 3Com 3c900B-TPO if_dc_load="YES" # NetGear FA310TX if_ppp_load="YES" # PPP ... Yet, it still comes up with if_dc.ko loaded and no if_xl.ko. On another similar note, a few minutes ago I realized that the snd_emu10k1.ko module wasn't loading because: Preloaded elf module "snd_emu10k1.ko" at 0xc037f544. link_elf: symbol sndbuf_getbps undefined So, after the system was up I figured I'd try to reload it. I figured I needed snd_pcm.ko or something, so I kldload'd it and locked my system solid. On the reboot after that, I went back to the 'ok' prompt in loader, and decided to try 'load /modules/snd.ko'. It registered 5342532 different sound modules (all of them I think), yet doing 'lsmod' in loader showed NONE of them except the snd_emu10k1.ko from my loader.conf. Upon boot, none of them were there. So, what happened to my 'load /modules/snd.ko'? -- Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org For PGP key, send e-mail with subject "send pgp key" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 0:29:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from chmod.ath.cx (CC2-1242.charter-stl.com [24.217.116.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FEA37B73F for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:29:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx) Received: by chmod.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C0AD4A90B; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:29:30 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:29:30 -0600 From: Andrew Hesford To: Sean Kelly Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010320022930.A1089@cec.wustl.edu> References: <20010319235314.A444@edgemaster.zombie.org> <20010319230008.B15322@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010320013443.A472@edgemaster.zombie.org> <20010319235300.A16082@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010320020229.A435@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010320020229.A435@edgemaster.zombie.org>; from smkelly@zombie.org on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:02:29AM -0600 X-Loop: Andrew Hesford Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well... I know that xl and dc get along just fine, since the packets you have received that constitute this message passed through a firewally/router using xl0 and dc0 as the two network interfaces. Have you built a kernel with all these options built in? Is there still trouble? Why do you need /boot/loader to load them right away? Won't the kernel automatically load the modules the first time they are used? I've always believed in the one-giant-kernel point of view. Most things, definitely NIC drivers, should be built right into the kernel. Try this first. If recognition still fails, maybe you have broken or conflicting hardware. On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:02:29AM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote: > No matter whether I specify miibus or not in loader.conf, it still fails to > load if_xl.ko even though it is registered. If, however, I remove if_dc.ko > and miibus.ko from loader.conf, then if_xl.ko will load properly. It > seems to me that the two modules (xl and dc) don't get along, or that there > is some sort of limit to the number of modules it wants to load. -- Andrew Hesford ajh3@chmod.ath.cx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 0:40:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (edgemaster.creighton.edu [147.134.107.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3476D37B742 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:40:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smkelly@zombie.org) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D76B2991B; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:38:26 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:38:26 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: Andrew Hesford Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010320023826.A542@edgemaster.zombie.org> References: <20010319235314.A444@edgemaster.zombie.org> <20010319230008.B15322@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010320013443.A472@edgemaster.zombie.org> <20010319235300.A16082@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010320020229.A435@edgemaster.zombie.org> <20010320022930.A1089@cec.wustl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010320022930.A1089@cec.wustl.edu>; from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:29:30AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:29:30AM -0600, Andrew Hesford wrote: > Well... I know that xl and dc get along just fine, since the packets you > have received that constitute this message passed through a > firewally/router using xl0 and dc0 as the two network interfaces. I know they work together after you get the modules loaded, because I'm writing to you from the same machine with the Internet on xl0. They are both loaded now, it's just that something funny is going on when they are loaded via loader/kernel/whatever. > Have you built a kernel with all these options built in? Is there still > trouble? Why do you need /boot/loader to load them right away? Won't the > kernel automatically load the modules the first time they are used? Aren't you testimonial that they work together in a kernel? The problem involves modules, not the drivers, as far as I can tell. I want to have them booted with loader because I can. Does there have to be a reason for using a feature of FreeBSD, and do you have to justify wanting it to work the way it is intended? > I've always believed in the one-giant-kernel point of view. Most things, > definitely NIC drivers, should be built right into the kernel. Try this > first. If recognition still fails, maybe you have broken or conflicting > hardware. Again, it isn't hardware. I am not sure where I stand on whether monolithic or modular kernels are better, but I know one thing. That one thing I know is that this isn't working and it should be. That, in my opinion, is justification enough to write to this list and see what can be found to fix it so it is in working order. I can't imagine I'm the only person who will ever have all their modules in /boot/loader.conf, and do you want to turn away every person who does this and just say "Build a monolithic kernel?" -- Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org For PGP key, send e-mail with subject "send pgp key" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 0:54:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B53C37B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:54:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2K8pVg16380; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:51:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103200851.f2K8pVg16380@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Sean Kelly Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:18:55 CST." <20010320021855.A433@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:51:31 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I *suspect* that what's happening is that the dependancy checking code is > > incorrectly not registering the if_xl module when it discovers that its > > dependancy (miibus) is already loaded. > > > > You can verify this by reversing the load order, ie. loading if_xl first. > > If this results in if_dc disappearing, then we have a smoking gun. > > Your smoking gun just set itself on fire and burnt to death in a test run: > (2) smkelly@edgemaster:~$ cat /boot/loader.conf > ... > # Network > #miibus_load="YES" > if_xl_load="YES" # 3Com 3c900B-TPO > if_dc_load="YES" # NetGear FA310TX > if_ppp_load="YES" # PPP > ... > > Yet, it still comes up with if_dc.ko loaded and no if_xl.ko. Very poetic. Can you confirm that during the actual load process, if_xl was loaded before if_dc? I'm not certain that the ordering in loader.conf actually represents the order in which things are loaded. > On another similar note, a few minutes ago I realized that the > snd_emu10k1.ko module wasn't loading because: > Preloaded elf module "snd_emu10k1.ko" at 0xc037f544. > link_elf: symbol sndbuf_getbps undefined You need to get a grip on how things work here. The above is not indicative of a failure to load, but a failure to *link*. The process goes basically as follows: - Loader: - boot-conf reads loader.conf and iterates over all the variables in the environment, looking for *_load, and trying to load module files that match the variable name (if set to YES). - Dependancies listed in these module files are also loaded, and the load of a depending module is failed if its dependancies can't be loaded. - As each file is loaded, a record is kept of its name, location and size. This list is subsequently given to the kernel. - Kernel: - Early in the startup phase, the list of module files is scanned, and the kernel linker tries to link each one with the kernel. The result of the link is printed (eg. the link_elf quoted above). - The linking of these files also registers their linker set elements (SYSINITs, driver lists, etc.) > So, after the system was up I figured I'd try to reload it. I figured I > needed snd_pcm.ko or something, so I kldload'd it and locked my system > solid. Did kldstat -v show it already loaded? On the reboot after that, I went back to the 'ok' prompt in loader, > and decided to try 'load /modules/snd.ko'. It registered 5342532 different > sound modules (all of them I think), yet doing 'lsmod' in loader showed > NONE of them except the snd_emu10k1.ko from my loader.conf. lsmost should show loaded files, not modules. It sounds like it may not be working right, however. > Upon boot, > none of them were there. So, what happened to my 'load /modules/snd.ko'? Good question. I'll try to reproduce this, but I'm kinda hard up for time right now, so if anyone else feels like getting involved, I'd be much obliged. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 0:55:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583F737B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:55:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from svzserv.kemerovo.su (kost.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.82]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA81821 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:53:36 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Message-ID: <3AB71A8F.3B74B415@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:53:35 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release needs too much ports installed References: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> <20010319104406.A19463@peitho.fxp.org> <20010319231036.A2038@iname.com> <20010319165856.A47154@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nik Clayton wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:10:36PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > Thank you. But my question was: is ghostscript really used while > > building docs? > > Yes. Specifically, to convert images from one format to another. I > shall be revisiting this decision on the -doc mailing list. Please do so, because /usr/ports/print/ghostscript6 appears to be broken: md5 checksum is wrong for gdevcd8.tar.gz. distinfo says: MD5 (gdevdj9.c.gz) = f09ef883b8ba837fb42c608c01af7375 but really MD5 (gdevcd8.tar.gz) = 6ff0db0cb9f1190a1587ad6c335581cf My ports tree is no more than 12 hours old. Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 1:12:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (edgemaster.creighton.edu [147.134.107.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE44F37B718; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:12:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smkelly@zombie.org) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EA668991A; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:09:04 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:09:04 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: Mike Smith Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010320030904.A757@edgemaster.zombie.org> References: <20010320021855.A433@edgemaster.zombie.org> <200103200851.f2K8pVg16380@mass.dis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103200851.f2K8pVg16380@mass.dis.org>; from msmith@freebsd.org on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:51:31AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:51:31AM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: > > > I *suspect* that what's happening is that the dependancy checking code is > > > incorrectly not registering the if_xl module when it discovers that its > > > dependancy (miibus) is already loaded. ... > > Very poetic. Can you confirm that during the actual load process, if_xl > was loaded before if_dc? I'm not certain that the ordering in > loader.conf actually represents the order in which things are loaded. Hmm... I should have been smart enough to do that in the first place. I did it again, and if_dc.ko is still going before if_xl.ko even though if_xl is listed first in loader.conf. Guess order doesn't matter. > > On another similar note, a few minutes ago I realized that the > > snd_emu10k1.ko module wasn't loading because: > > Preloaded elf module "snd_emu10k1.ko" at 0xc037f544. > > link_elf: symbol sndbuf_getbps undefined > > You need to get a grip on how things work here. The above is not > indicative of a failure to load, but a failure to *link*. > > The process goes basically as follows: ... Thanks for clearing that up. > Did kldstat -v show it already loaded? If 'it' is snd_pcm.ko, then no. If 'it' is snd_emu10k1.ko, then no. I was goign to load snd_pcm and then snd_emu10k1, but the system locked upon my attempt for snd_pcm so I didn't get to the second... > > On the reboot after that, I went back to the 'ok' prompt in loader, > > and decided to try 'load /modules/snd.ko'. It registered 5342532 different > > sound modules (all of them I think), yet doing 'lsmod' in loader showed > > NONE of them except the snd_emu10k1.ko from my loader.conf. > > lsmost should show loaded files, not modules. It sounds like it may not > be working right, however. Sort of a misleading command name then. But still, shouldn't it have shown the sound modules that it registered just seconds before when I did 'load /boot/snd.ko'? It shows the other modules that it registered as specified in loader.conf (except if_xl.ko, but that is a separate issue, maybe). > > Upon boot, > > none of them were there. So, what happened to my 'load /modules/snd.ko'? > > Good question. I'll try to reproduce this, but I'm kinda hard up for > time right now, so if anyone else feels like getting involved, I'd be > much obliged. -- Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org For PGP key, send e-mail with subject "send pgp key" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 1:19:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-28.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EEB37B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:19:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC3CB66BDE; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:19:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:19:24 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release needs too much ports installed Message-ID: <20010320011924.A17038@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> <20010319104406.A19463@peitho.fxp.org> <20010319231036.A2038@iname.com> <20010319165856.A47154@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <3AB71A8F.3B74B415@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AB71A8F.3B74B415@svzserv.kemerovo.su>; from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:53:35PM +0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:53:35PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Nik Clayton wrote: > >=20 > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:10:36PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > Thank you. But my question was: is ghostscript really used while > > > building docs? > >=20 > > Yes. Specifically, to convert images from one format to another. I > > shall be revisiting this decision on the -doc mailing list. >=20 > Please do so, because /usr/ports/print/ghostscript6 appears to be broken: > md5 checksum is wrong for gdevcd8.tar.gz. distinfo says: > MD5 (gdevdj9.c.gz) =3D f09ef883b8ba837fb42c608c01af7375 > but really > MD5 (gdevcd8.tar.gz) =3D 6ff0db0cb9f1190a1587ad6c335581cf > My ports tree is no more than 12 hours old. Those are two different files you've listed there, but anyway, try removing the offending one from /usr/ports/distfiles and re-fetching. Often files which don't have any versioning information in the name (such as this one) get updated, and there's no way for the ports system to know that you have the old version, not the new one, so it uses the copy you already have, which fails the checksum. Kris --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6tyCcWry0BWjoQKURAvAeAKDPG6QCUW0ZLBNMCRHa61l5RkC4eACglGC1 Jt1BBIySWC43bPnIEEukhsQ= =8AGN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 1:34:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880CE37B723 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:34:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from svzserv.kemerovo.su (kost.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.82]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA91745 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:34:20 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Message-ID: <3AB7241B.7BA02600@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:34:19 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release needs too much ports installed References: <20010319223215.A1110@iname.com> <20010319104406.A19463@peitho.fxp.org> <20010319231036.A2038@iname.com> <20010319165856.A47154@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <3AB71A8F.3B74B415@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20010320011924.A17038@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Often files which don't have any versioning information in the name > (such as this one) get updated, and there's no way for the ports > system to know that you have the old version, not the new one, so it > uses the copy you already have, which fails the checksum. Thanks, now it's all right. Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 3:36:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from joliet.groenquist.com (cx707588-b.santab1.ca.home.com [65.5.150.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E3437B737 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:36:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@groenquist.com) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by joliet.groenquist.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2KBaBc06375; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:36:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@groenquist.com) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:36:11 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Groener To: Dennis Reiter Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dell Latitude C600 In-Reply-To: <20010319140556.B83749@reiters.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I had no luck whatsoever with 4.x (RELEASE,STABLE,BETA) on C600, so I switched to 5.0-CURRENT. Works fine, even cardbus support works ok (using 3com xl cardbus card). It's very much a moving target (I rebuild daily to keep up on changes), but has been usable so far. My install was definitely non-standard: 1. Installed 4.2-RELEASE from CD w/o PCCARD support of any kind (disable everything you can). 2. Got box up without PCCARD support (wouldn't hang, but not usable). 3. Burned /usr/src from 5.0-CURRENT onto CD and copied over /usr/src. 4. Make buildworld, kernel, installworld. (build takes 132 minutes) 5. Box worked on 5.0-CURRENT. 6. Tweaked NEWCARD config to my liking, mostly ripped out fluff. 7. Now supports both cardbus cards and Dell Dock NIC's (not at same time, because I am lazy and never want this option). I am following the posts on -mobile, cvs-all, and -stable for a chance to try my hand at 4.3-BETA again. Without cardbus, though, I probably won't be happy without 5.0-CURRENT. One last note: I had no luck with XFree86 3.3.6; use port or packages install for 4.0.[23] and you should be fine. Let me know if you want to see my kernel config or my XF86Config, and I will post them privately. Cheers, -matt On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Dennis Reiter wrote: > I installed 4.2 Release from the CDs onto my Dell Latitude C600 > this weekend, but I'm having troubles. I can't boot if I have a > PCMCIA card inserted, or if I insert a card after booting up, the > machine freezes. > > I successfully installed 4.2 onto an Inspiron 7500 and it runs like > a champ. I mainly needed the Lucent Wavelan card to work and with > a couple of wicontrol tweaks, it does. > > Here's snippets from dmesg of each machine. Has anybody else had > these problems/ made it work? > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 3:55:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from phya.yonsei.ac.kr (phya.yonsei.ac.kr [165.132.30.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E4D37B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:55:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jabber@phya.yonsei.ac.kr) Received: from solidi ([165.132.30.96]) by phya.yonsei.ac.kr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id f2KBpRL11830 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:51:27 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <000a01c0b134$9b2ff100$601e84a5@yonsei.ac.kr> From: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?seix4rn8?= To: Subject: help Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:55:05 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C0B180.0A6FC040" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C0B180.0A6FC040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 aGVscA0K ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C0B180.0A6FC040 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMCBUcmFuc2l0aW9uYWwv L0VOIj4NCjxIVE1MPjxIRUFEPg0KPE1FVEEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj1Db250ZW50LVR5cGUgY29udGVu dD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PWtzX2NfNTYwMS0xOTg3Ij4NCjxNRVRBIGNvbnRlbnQ9Ik1T SFRNTCA1LjUwLjQ1MjIuMTgwMCIgbmFtZT1HRU5FUkFUT1I+DQo8U1RZTEU+PC9TVFlMRT4NCjwv SEVBRD4NCjxCT0RZIGJnQ29sb3I9I2ZmZmZmZj4NCjxESVY+PEZPTlQgc2l6ZT0yPmhlbHA8L0ZP TlQ+PC9ESVY+PC9CT0RZPjwvSFRNTD4NCg== ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C0B180.0A6FC040-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 4: 1:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from joliet.groenquist.com (cx707588-b.santab1.ca.home.com [65.5.150.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEAD37B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 04:01:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@groenquist.com) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by joliet.groenquist.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2KBgRk06386; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:42:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@groenquist.com) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:42:27 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Groener To: Nick Slager Cc: Frank Seltzer , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Xircom Cardbus support In-Reply-To: <20010320142705.A90624@albury.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Thus spake Frank Seltzer (frank_s@bellsouth.net): > > > I just received a Dell Inspiron 4000 laptop with a Xircom Realport CardBus > > Ethernet 10/100 + Modem 56 model # RBEM56G-100. > > > > According to the release notes for 4.2, the "Xircom Realport card + modem" > > card is supported. Is this the same part? My machine will not boot with > > the card installed. It hangs right after displaying > > No, they are different cards. Cardbus cards aren't supported in FreeBSD > 4.x. There is support in -CURRENT, but you need to understand what > you're doing if that's the path you choose. See > http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/current-stable.html I use both the Dell-supplied Xircom Carbus card of which you speak and the 3com xl-based Cardbus card in my Latitude C600 without any major issues, but I use 5.0-CURRENT. This in itself is a major issue, but as long as "make buildworld" works with that day's CVS tree, I haven't had problems. I also use packages install of XFree86 4.0.3 with only an occasional snag. The Latitude C600 uses the ATI Rage Mobility 3 chipset. Checkout -mobile if you really want to keep up with a laptop. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 5:35:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tsing.ita.tip.net (tsing.ita.tip.net [194.20.0.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE0137B71A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 05:35:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olgeni@uli.it) Received: from backoffice.localdomain.net ([194.244.229.102]) by tsing.ita.tip.net (AurorA/BorealE) with ESMTP id OAA08748 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:19:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by backoffice.localdomain.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2KDVqk01359 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:31:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olgeni@uli.it) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:31:52 +0100 (CET) From: Jimmy Olgeni X-X-Sender: To: Subject: kernel panic on 4-stable (filesystem related) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, I was sorting a large file with "sort" and ran out of space on / (filled up /tmp). Doing so, I got a kernel panic: GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"... (no debugging symbols found)... IdlePTD 5271552 initial pcb at 430220 panicstr: ffs_truncate3 panic messages: --- panic: ffs_truncate3 syncing disks... 9 1 done Uptime: 16m17s dumping to dev #ad/0x20001, offset 262272 dump ata0: resetting devices .. done 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 --- #0 0xc01a2d9a in dumpsys () (kgdb) where #0 0xc01a2d9a in dumpsys () #1 0xc01a2bbb in boot () #2 0xc01a2f51 in panic () #3 0xc02c9c76 in ffs_truncate () #4 0xc02d42a9 in ufs_inactive () #5 0xc02d9b11 in ufs_vnoperate () #6 0xc01cf651 in vrele () #7 0xc01d5d97 in vn_close () #8 0xc01d6634 in vn_closefile () #9 0xc0198e65 in fdrop () #10 0xc0198dab in closef () #11 0xc0198b24 in fdfree () #12 0xc019b2e9 in exit1 () #13 0xc019b160 in exit1 () #14 0xc0351b39 in syscall2 () #15 0xc0343355 in Xint0x80_syscall () #16 0x80490a9 in ?? () #17 0x804b403 in ?? () #18 0x804c3e3 in ?? () #19 0x8048cb5 in ?? () (kgdb) Before the panic, I got a message from "sort" complaining about the full filesystem, so it didn't die immediately. My local mounts are: /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) /dev/ad0s1f on /usr (ufs, NFS exported, local, noatime, with quotas, soft-updates) /dev/ad0s1e on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) I have some nfs mounts too, but I guess that they are not related to this problem. This happened on a very recent cvsupped -stable: FreeBSD backoffice.localdomain.net 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #5: Tue Mar 20 09:37:54 CET 2001 olgeni@backoffice.localdomain.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSDBOX i386 Any clue? If necessary, I can set up a spare box to run some tests. -- jimmy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 6:13:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from muddywaters.muzak.com (relay.muzak.com [12.19.54.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE02F37B723; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 06:12:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from helpdesk5@golfmail.com) Received: from 10.1.1.8 by muddywaters.muzak.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:00:34 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Received: from muddywaters.muzak.com (MUDDYWATERS [10.144.40.16]) by marley.muzak.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id GFR2WFQ8; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:00:34 -0500 Received: from 209.208.45.16 by muddywaters.muzak.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:00:30 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) To: hungryjack@republic.com Date: Sun, 18 Mar 01 15:47:38 EST From: helpdesk5@golfmail.com Subject: toner supplies Message-Id: <20010320141237.BE02F37B723@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG PLEASE FORWARD TO THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING YOUR LASER PRINTER SUPPLIES **** VORTEX SUPPLIES **** -SPECIALS OF THE DAY ON LASER TONER SUPPLIES AT DISCOUNT PRICES-- LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES COPIER AND FAX CARTRIDGES WE ARE -->THE<-- PLACE TO BUY YOUR TONER CARTRIDGES BECAUSE YOU SAVE UP TO 30% FROM OFFICE DEPOT'S, QUILL'S OR OFFICE MAX'S EVERY DAY LOW PRICES ORDER BY PHONE:1-888-288-9043 ORDER BY FAX: 1-888-977-1577 CUSTOMER SERVICE: 1-888-248-2015 E-MAIL REMOVAL LINE: 1-888-248-4930 UNIVERSITY AND/OR SCHOOL PURCHASE ORDERS WELCOME. (NO CREDIT APPROVAL REQUIRED) ALL OTHER PURCHASE ORDER REQUESTS REQUIRE CREDIT APPROVAL. PAY BY CHECK (C.O.D), CREDIT CARD OR PURCHASE ORDER (NET 30 DAYS). IF YOUR ORDER IS BY CREDIT CARD PLEASE LEAVE YOUR CREDIT CARD # PLUS EXPIRATION DATE. IF YOUR ORDER IS BY PURCHASE ORDER LEAVE YOUR SHIPPING/BILLING ADDRESSES AND YOUR P.O. NUMBER NO SHIPPING CHARGES FOR ORDERS $49 OR OVER ADD $4.75 FOR ORDERS UNDER $49. C.O.D. ORDERS ADD $4.5 TO SHIPPING CHARGES. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO REQUIRE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT OUR COMPANY INCUDING FEDERAL TAX ID NUMBER, CLOSEST SHIPPING OR CORPORATE ADDRESS IN THE CONTINENTAL U.S. OR FOR CATALOG REQUESTS PLEASE CALL OUR CUSTOMER SERVICE LINE 1-888-248-2015 OUR NEW , LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGE, PRICES ARE AS FOLLOWS: (PLEASE ORDER BY PAGE NUMBER AND/OR ITEM NUMBER) HEWLETT PACKARD: (ON PAGE 2) ITEM #1 LASERJET SERIES 4L,4P (74A)------------------------$44 ITEM #2 LASERJET SERIES 1100 (92A)-------------------------$44 ITEM #3 LASERJET SERIES 2 (95A)-------------------------------$39 ITEM #4 LASERJET SERIES 2P (75A)-----------------------------$54 ITEM #5 LASERJET SERIES 5P,6P,5MP, 6MP (3903A)--$44 ITEM #6 LASERJET SERIES 5SI, 5000 (29A)------------------$95 ITEM #7 LASERJET SERIES 2100 (96A)-------------------------$74 ITEM #8 LASERJET SERIES 8100 (82X)-----------------------$145 ITEM #9 LASERJET SERIES 5L/6L (3906A0------------------$35 ITEM #10 LASERJET SERIES 4V-------------------------------------$95 ITEM #11 LASERJET SERIES 4000 (27X)-------------------------$72 ITEM #12 LASERJET SERIES 3SI/4SI (91A)--------------------$54 ITEM #13 LASERJET SERIES 4, 4M, 5,5M-----------------------$49 HEWLETT PACKARD FAX (ON PAGE 2) ITEM #14 LASERFAX 500, 700 (FX1)----------$49 ITEM #15 LASERFAX 5000,7000 (FX2)------$54 ITEM #16 LASERFAX (FX3)------------------------$59 ITEM #17 LASERFAX (FX4)------------------------$54 LEXMARK/IBM (ON PAGE 3) OPTRA 4019, 4029 HIGH YIELD---------------$89 OPTRA R, 4039, 4049 HIGH YIELD---------$105 OPTRA E----------------------------------------------------$59 OPTRA N--------------------------------------------------$115 OPTRA S--------------------------------------------------$165 - EPSON (ON PAGE 4) ACTION LASER 7000,7500,8000,9000-------$105 ACTION LASER 1000,1500-------------------------$105 CANON PRINTERS (ON PAGE 5) PLEASE CALL FOR MODELS AND UPDATED PRICES FOR CANON PRINTER CARTRIDGES PANASONIC (0N PAGE 7) NEC SERIES 2 MODELS 90 AND 95----------$105 APPLE (0N PAGE 8) LASER WRITER PRO 600 or 16/600------------$49 LASER WRITER SELECT 300,320,360---------$74 LASER WRITER 300 AND 320----------------------$54 LASER WRITER NT, 2NT------------------------------$54 LASER WRITER 12/640--------------------------------$79 CANON FAX (ON PAGE 9) LASERCLASS 4000 (FX3)---------------------------$59 LASERCLASS 5000,6000,7000 (FX2)---------$54 LASERFAX 5000,7000 (FX2)----------------------$54 LASERFAX 8500,9000 (FX4)----------------------$54 CANON COPIERS (PAGE 10) PC 3, 6RE, 7 AND 11 (A30)---------------------$69 PC 300,320,700,720 and 760 (E-40)--------$89 IF YOUR CARTRIDGE IS NOT LISTED CALL CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 1-888-248-2015 90 DAY UNLIMITED WARRANTY INCLUDED ON ALL PRODUCTS. ALL TRADEMARKS AND BRAND NAMES LISTED ABOVE ARE PROPERTY OF THE RESPECTIVE HOLDERS AND USED FOR DESCRIPTIVE PURPOSES ONLY. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 6:27: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from localhost.grauel.com (usr1-3.mintel.net [63.81.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E0937B72B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 06:26:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rjk@grauel.com) Received: (from rjk@localhost) by localhost.grauel.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2KEQt301671; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:26:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rjk) From: Richard J Kuhns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15031.26798.497131.589152@localhost.grauel.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:26:54 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ATAPI CD problem with 4.3-BETA X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG To summarize: I recently replaced my motherboard/RAM/processor and now my HP 9350i CD burner doesn't work anymore. I'm sure the drive itself is still ok -- I took it to the office yesterday and put it in an HP Pavilion (running FreeBSD 4.2), and it worked just fine. I went from a Micron PC motherboard that was a couple of years old whose IDE controllers would only go to UDMA33 to a TYAN Tiger 230. The 9350 is found by the bios just fine, and I was able to boot the 4.2 cd from it. When I boot from the hard drive it seems to be found ok, but an attempt to mount a cd (in this case, the 4.2 cd I'd booted from earlier) hangs as follows: moran:~$ ps axlw|grep cd 0 544 1 0 28 0 204 92 atprq D p3- 0:00.00 cd9660 -o ro -o noauto /dev/acd0c /cdrom (mount_cd9660) moran:~$ with the following messages repeat at regular intervals: acd0: REQUEST_SENSE command timeout - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. done acd0: read data overrun 18/0 I'm including dmesg output below. If anyone can offer any suggestions I'd greatly appreciate it. If you need more info just let me know. I guess I should also mention that I have ATA66 compliant cables on both IDE controllers, despite the message below. Thanks... Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #3: Tue Mar 20 08:28:09 EST 2001 rjk@moran.grauel.com:/misc/src/sys/compile/MORAN Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (933.02-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x686 Stepping = 6 Features=0x387fbff real memory = 268369920 (262080K bytes) avail memory = 257560576 (251524K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0388000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc038809c. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk apm0: on motherboard apm: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xd000-0xd00f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 9 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 9 at device 7.3 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered chip1: at device 7.4 on pci0 fxp0: port 0xdc00-0xdc1f mem 0xd5000000-0xd50fffff,0xd5100000-0xd5100fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:5a:0b:aa pcm0: port 0xe000-0xe03f irq 5 at device 9.0 on pci0 pci0: at 11.0 irq 10 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 ata0-master: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 compliant cable ad0: 19531MB [39683/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 ad1: 58623MB [119108/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA66 acd0: CD-RW at ata1-master using PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a acd0: REQUEST_SENSE command timeout - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. done acd0: read data overrun 18/0 acd0: REQUEST_SENSE command timeout - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. done acd0: read data overrun 18/0 acd0: REQUEST_SENSE command timeout - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. done acd0: read data overrun 18/0 acd0: REQUEST_SENSE command timeout - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. done acd0: REQUEST_SENSE command timeout - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. done acd0: read data overrun 18/0 acd0: REQUEST_SENSE command timeout - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. done acd0: read data overrun 18/0 acd0: REQUEST_SENSE command timeout - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. done acd0: read data overrun 18/0 -- Richard Kuhns rjk@grauel.com PO Box 6249 Tel: (765)477-6000 \ 100 Sawmill Road x319 Lafayette, IN 47903 (800)489-4891 / To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 7: 8:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.electronicpage.co.uk (mail.electronicpage.co.uk [195.10.240.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EDE37B743 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 07:08:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lawrence@epcdirect.co.uk) Received: (from root@localhost) by mail.electronicpage.co.uk (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f2KF5dT30909 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:05:39 GMT (envelope-from lawrence@epcdirect.co.uk) Received: from lfarr (daisy.int.epcdirect.co.uk [192.168.6.200]) by mail.electronicpage.co.uk (8.11.2/8.11.2av) with SMTP id f2KF5b830901 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:05:37 GMT (envelope-from lawrence@epcdirect.co.uk) From: "Lawrence Farr" To: Subject: Make Release from within a script. Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:05:38 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Running a "make release" from within a shell script (/bin/sh) errors with: (snip) ===> share/doc/papers/kernmalloc (cd /usr/src/share/doc/papers/kernmalloc; soelim kernmalloc.t) > kernmalloc.ms vgrind -f < /usr/src/share/doc/papers/kernmalloc/appendix.t > appendix.ms *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/src/share/doc/papers/kernmalloc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/share/doc/papers. (snip) Whereas running manually from a shell works perfectly. I have tried adding a PATH= line to the script, and have run out of ideas. Can anyone suggest anything? Cheers! Lawrence Farr EPC Direct Limited mailto:lawrence@epcdirect.co.uk T:01179666123 F:01179666111 M:07970780901 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 7:53:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cosa.uk-legal.net (cosa.uk-legal.net [212.240.216.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0896337B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 07:53:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@cosa.uk-legal.net) Received: by cosa.uk-legal.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A823911289; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:53:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cosa.uk-legal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAFD1A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:53:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:53:08 +0000 (GMT) From: Andrew Tulloch To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: /usr/ports/apache13 & sig11 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I built apache from the ports updated this morning using cvsup and for some reason everytime I run `apachectl start` httpd Sig 11 core dumps. The machine itself seems to be fine apart from this having postfix/cyrus-imapd running fine for a few days since I built the machine. Its also hosted a couple of buildworlds so I don't think the ram is at fault, although I also tried swapping it out to be sure. a quick gdb /usr/local/sbin/httpd httpd.core and bt gave (gdb) bt #0 0x8064287 in ap_get_local_host () #1 0x80616c0 in ap_fini_vhost_config () #2 0x80539a3 in ap_read_config () #3 0x805b408 in main () #4 0x804ea11 in _start () and seems to be the same for every dump. dmesg below.. Any help would be greatly appreciated! :) Andrew Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #2: Tue Mar 20 14:39:36 GMT 2001 root@biliskner.great4.co.uk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BILISKNER Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (647.19-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x681 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 268435456 (262144K bytes) avail memory = 256425984 (250416K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0403000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 pci0: (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371) at 15.0 irq 11 fxp0: port 0x1080-0x10bf mem 0x48000000-0x480fffff,0x48100000-0x48100fff irq 11 at device 16.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:92:77:23 isab0: at device 20.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1060-0x106f at device 20.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0x1040-0x105f irq 11 at device 20.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered chip1: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 20.3 on pci0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 IP Filter: v3.4.16 initialized. Default = pass all, Logging = enabled ata1-slave: ata_command: timeout waiting for intr ata1-slave: identify failed ad0: 19546MB [39714/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master using PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 8:10:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.wipol.uni-bonn.de (data.wipol.uni-bonn.de [131.220.47.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F3437B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:10:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from noel@koethe.net) Received: by mail.wipol.uni-bonn.de (Postfix, from userid 506) id B0FAB3D11; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:10:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wipol.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC6AB6DF for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:10:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:10:47 +0100 (CET) From: Noel Koethe X-Sender: noel@data.wipol.uni-bonn.de To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: dmesg output Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, since some weeks my dmesg output is broken: # dmesg 2250 192.168.159.255:138 in via xl0 I got the broken output in the mails every night. # uname -a FreeBSD rock.domain.de 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: Fri Mar 16 22:53:58 \ CET 2001 I tried some cvsup updates but the output is always cuted.:( Maybe someone can give me a hint to fix it if the problem is located at my machine. Thanks. -- MvfG Noel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 8:25:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4B3537B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:25:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tmoestl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 31765 invoked by uid 0); 20 Mar 2001 16:25:15 -0000 Received: from p3e9e0375.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO forge.local) (62.158.3.117) by mail.gmx.net (mp008-rz3) with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 16:25:15 -0000 Received: from tmm by forge.local with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14fOww-0000XE-00; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:25:34 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:25:34 +0100 From: Thomas Moestl To: Noel Koethe Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dmesg output Message-ID: <20010320172534.A1977@crow.dom2ip.de> Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Moestl , Noel Koethe , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from noel@koethe.net on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:10:47PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:10:47PM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote: > since some weeks my dmesg output is broken: > # dmesg > 2250 192.168.159.255:138 in via xl0 > > I got the broken output in the mails every night. > > # uname -a > FreeBSD rock.domain.de 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: Fri Mar 16 22:53:58 \ > CET 2001 > > I tried some cvsup updates but the output is always cuted.:( > > Maybe someone can give me a hint to fix it if the problem is located at my > machine. Try "dmesg -a". The messages are stored in a ring buffer, so the oldest ones will be overwritten if the buffer fills up. Additionally, dmesg will normally not show the console output that is also stored in the message buffer. This produces these effects. This is starting to become a FAQ... - thomas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 8:36:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.wipol.uni-bonn.de (data.wipol.uni-bonn.de [131.220.47.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29D537B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:36:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from noel@koethe.net) Received: by mail.wipol.uni-bonn.de (Postfix, from userid 506) id 4CB613D11; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:36:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wipol.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3809FB6DF; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:36:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:36:49 +0100 (CET) From: Noel Koethe X-Sender: noel@data.wipol.uni-bonn.de To: Thomas Moestl Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dmesg output In-Reply-To: <20010320172534.A1977@crow.dom2ip.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Thomas Moestl wrote: Hello, > > since some weeks my dmesg output is broken: > > # dmesg > > 2250 192.168.159.255:138 in via xl0 > > > > Maybe someone can give me a hint to fix it if the problem is located at my > > machine. > > Try "dmesg -a". The messages are stored in a ring buffer, so the > oldest ones will be overwritten if the buffer fills up. Additionally, > dmesg will normally not show the console output that is also stored in > the message buffer. This produces these effects. > This is starting to become a FAQ... dmesg -a works. Thx. But on another machine dmesg still works: # dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. ... icmp-response bandwidth limit 522/200 pps icmp-response bandwidth limit 861/200 pps ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata0: resetting devices .. done ad0: UDMA ICRC READ ERROR blk# 13939543 retrying ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata0: resetting devices .. done Why it is here normal on one machine and cutted on the other? And why does it work before ( I'm sure in December it doesn't work like now )? Thanks. -- MvfG Noel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 8:43:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from secure.webhotel.net (secure.webhotel.net [195.41.202.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 706E337B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:43:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hroi@chewbacca.netgroup.dk) Received: (qmail 119002826 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2001 16:46:55 -0000 Received: from mail-gateway.webhotel.net (195.41.202.215) by mail.webhotel.net with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 16:46:55 -0000 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 17:46:55(CET) on March 20, 2001 Received: (from hroi@localhost) by chewbacca.netgroup.dk (8.11.3/8.9.3) id f2KGhWm31318; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:43:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hroi) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:43:32 +0100 From: Hroi Sigurdsson To: Andrew Tulloch Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: /usr/ports/apache13 & sig11 Message-ID: <20010320174332.A31024@chewbacca.netgroup.dk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from andrew@cosa.uk-legal.net on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:53:08PM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG CC'ed to new-httpd@apache.org. More below. On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:53:08PM +0000, Andrew Tulloch wrote: > I built apache from the ports updated this morning using cvsup and for > some reason everytime I run `apachectl start` httpd Sig 11 core dumps. The > machine itself seems to be fine apart from this having postfix/cyrus-imapd > running fine for a few days since I built the machine. Its also hosted a > couple of buildworlds so I don't think the ram is at fault, although I > also tried swapping it out to be sure. > > a quick gdb /usr/local/sbin/httpd httpd.core and bt gave > (gdb) bt > #0 0x8064287 in ap_get_local_host () > #1 0x80616c0 in ap_fini_vhost_config () > #2 0x80539a3 in ap_read_config () > #3 0x805b408 in main () > #4 0x804ea11 in _start () > > and seems to be the same for every dump. > dmesg below.. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated! :) This is most likely not a bug in FreeBSD. I've seen the exact same thing on Linux, Apache 1.3.19: This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu"... (gdb) run -X Starting program: /usr/pkg/apache/bin/httpd -X Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x808d263 in ap_get_local_host (a=0x80de99c) at util.c:2051 2051 util.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) where #0 0x808d263 in ap_get_local_host (a=0x80de99c) at util.c:2051 #1 0x808920d in ap_fini_vhost_config (p=0x80de99c, main_s=0x80de9c4) at http_vhost.c:548 #2 0x8075dd9 in ap_read_config (p=0x80de99c, ptemp=0x80e29bc, confname=0x80cf5c0 "conf/httpd.conf") at http_config.c:1595 #3 0x80804ec in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffffdb4) at http_main.c:4986 (gdb) print str $1 = "slave0-1\000-\001@ėøĸŋH*\001@\000\000\000@ĖøĸŋČøĸŋā-\001@Äøĸŋ\002\000\000\000ā-\001@H*\001@Č0\001@(\b\000@\016\024\000" (gdb) print sizeof(str) $2 = 64 (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function ap_get_local_host: 0x808d1b4 : push %ebp 0x808d1b5 : mov %esp,%ebp 0x808d1b7 : sub $0x58,%esp 0x808d1ba : movl $0x0,0xffffffbc(%ebp) 0x808d1c1 : add $0xfffffff8,%esp 0x808d1c4 : push $0x3f 0x808d1c6 : lea 0xffffffc0(%ebp),%eax 0x808d1c9 : push %eax 0x808d1ca : call 0x804f678 0x808d1cf : add $0x10,%esp 0x808d1d2 : mov %eax,%eax 0x808d1d4 : test %eax,%eax 0x808d1d6 : je 0x808d220 0x808d1d8 : add $0xfffffff8,%esp 0x808d1db : mov 0x80cd590,%eax 0x808d1e0 : push %eax 0x808d1e1 : push $0x80c59a0 0x808d1e6 : push $0x0 0x808d1e8 : push $0x4 0x808d1ea : push $0x7f8 0x808d1ef : push $0x80c54fa 0x808d1f4 : call 0x807b940 [snip] The line in question is if (gethostname(str, sizeof(str) - 1) != 0) { At first I thought it was a bug in glibc/linux. A work-around is setting the ServerName directive in httpd.conf so that ap_get_local_host() doesn't get called. -- Hroi Sigurdsson hroi@netgroup.dk Netgroup A/S http://www.netgroup.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 8:56:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from clio.sc.intel.com (scfdns01.sc.intel.com [143.183.152.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB5D37B71A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:56:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by clio.sc.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.35 2001/02/12 09:03:45 smothers Exp $) with ESMTP id QAA26841 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:56:38 GMT Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.14 2001/01/02 18:39:59 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id JAA12109 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:56:37 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-To: X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id LAA00420; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:56:38 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15031.35782.172735.933807@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:56:38 -0700 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: OT: mailing lists having problems? X-Mailer: VM 6.91 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, over the weekend I stopped getting messages from the various freebsd-* mailing lists. Is there a problem with the list software or config? I've gone the mailing list archives for the week and see that traffic is happily taking place in the lists--I'm just not getting any of it. Re-subscribe to the lists?? Please cc: Thanks, -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds This space intentionally left blank due to | | 480-554-9092 CH6-210 lack of resources. | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 9: 1:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cosa.uk-legal.net (cosa.uk-legal.net [212.240.216.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FC537B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:01:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@cosa.uk-legal.net) Received: by cosa.uk-legal.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66B5411289; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:01:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cosa.uk-legal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4911A; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:01:34 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:01:34 +0000 (GMT) From: Andrew Tulloch To: Hroi Sigurdsson Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: /usr/ports/apache13 & sig11 In-Reply-To: <20010320174332.A31024@chewbacca.netgroup.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG One ServerName directive later and it works :) Thanks!=20 Andrew On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Hroi Sigurdsson wrote: > CC'ed to new-httpd@apache.org. More below. >=20 > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:53:08PM +0000, Andrew Tulloch wrote: >=20 > > I built apache from the ports updated this morning using cvsup and for > > some reason everytime I run `apachectl start` httpd Sig 11 core dumps. = The > > machine itself seems to be fine apart from this having postfix/cyrus-im= apd > > running fine for a few days since I built the machine. Its also hosted = a > > couple of buildworlds so I don't think the ram is at fault, although I > > also tried swapping it out to be sure. > >=20 > > a quick gdb /usr/local/sbin/httpd httpd.core and bt gave > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x8064287 in ap_get_local_host () > > #1 0x80616c0 in ap_fini_vhost_config () > > #2 0x80539a3 in ap_read_config () > > #3 0x805b408 in main () > > #4 0x804ea11 in _start () > >=20 > > and seems to be the same for every dump. > > dmesg below.. > >=20 > > Any help would be greatly appreciated! :) >=20 > This is most likely not a bug in FreeBSD. I've seen the exact same thing = on > Linux, Apache 1.3.19: >=20 > This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu"... > (gdb) run -X > Starting program: /usr/pkg/apache/bin/httpd -X >=20 > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x808d263 in ap_get_local_host (a=3D0x80de99c) at util.c:2051 > 2051=09util.c: No such file or directory. > (gdb) where > #0 0x808d263 in ap_get_local_host (a=3D0x80de99c) at util.c:2051 > #1 0x808920d in ap_fini_vhost_config (p=3D0x80de99c, main_s=3D0x80de9c4) > at http_vhost.c:548 > #2 0x8075dd9 in ap_read_config (p=3D0x80de99c, ptemp=3D0x80e29bc,=20 > confname=3D0x80cf5c0 "conf/httpd.conf") at http_config.c:1595 > #3 0x80804ec in main (argc=3D2, argv=3D0xbffffdb4) at http_main.c:4986 > (gdb) print str > $1 =3D "slave0-1\000-\001@=EC=F8=FF=BFH*\001@\000\000\000@=CC=F8=FF=BF=C8= =F8=FF=BF=E0-\001@=C4=F8=FF=BF\002\000\000\000=E0-\001@H*\001@=C80\001@(\b\= 000@\016\024\000" > (gdb) print sizeof(str) > $2 =3D 64 > (gdb) disassemble=20 > Dump of assembler code for function ap_get_local_host: > 0x808d1b4 :=09push %ebp > 0x808d1b5 :=09mov %esp,%ebp > 0x808d1b7 :=09sub $0x58,%esp > 0x808d1ba :=09movl $0x0,0xffffffbc(%ebp) > 0x808d1c1 :=09add $0xfffffff8,%esp > 0x808d1c4 :=09push $0x3f > 0x808d1c6 :=09lea 0xffffffc0(%ebp),%eax > 0x808d1c9 :=09push %eax > 0x808d1ca :=09call 0x804f678 > 0x808d1cf :=09add $0x10,%esp > 0x808d1d2 :=09mov %eax,%eax > 0x808d1d4 :=09test %eax,%eax > 0x808d1d6 :=09 > je 0x808d220 > 0x808d1d8 :=09add $0xfffffff8,%esp > 0x808d1db :=09mov 0x80cd590,%eax > 0x808d1e0 :=09push %eax > 0x808d1e1 :=09push $0x80c59a0 > 0x808d1e6 :=09push $0x0 > 0x808d1e8 :=09push $0x4 > 0x808d1ea :=09push $0x7f8 > 0x808d1ef :=09push $0x80c54fa > 0x808d1f4 :=09call 0x807b940 > [snip] >=20 > The line in question is=20 > if (gethostname(str, sizeof(str) - 1) !=3D 0) { >=20 > At first I thought it was a bug in glibc/linux. >=20 > A work-around is setting the ServerName directive in httpd.conf so that > ap_get_local_host() doesn't get called. >=20 > --=20 > Hroi Sigurdsson hroi@netgroup.dk > Netgroup A/S http://www.netgroup.dk >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 9:11:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A97537B71F for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:11:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tmoestl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 7470 invoked by uid 0); 20 Mar 2001 17:10:59 -0000 Received: from p3e9e0375.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO forge.local) (62.158.3.117) by mail.gmx.net (mp027-rz3) with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 17:10:59 -0000 Received: from tmm by forge.local with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14fPfB-0000dj-00; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:11:17 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:11:17 +0100 From: Thomas Moestl To: Noel Koethe Cc: Thomas Moestl , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dmesg output Message-ID: <20010320181117.A2347@crow.dom2ip.de> Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Moestl , Noel Koethe , Thomas Moestl , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20010320172534.A1977@crow.dom2ip.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from noel@koethe.net on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:36:49PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:36:49PM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > > since some weeks my dmesg output is broken: > > > # dmesg > > > 2250 192.168.159.255:138 in via xl0 > > > > > > Maybe someone can give me a hint to fix it if the problem is located at my > > > machine. > > > > Try "dmesg -a". The messages are stored in a ring buffer, so the > > oldest ones will be overwritten if the buffer fills up. Additionally, > > dmesg will normally not show the console output that is also stored in > > the message buffer. This produces these effects. > > This is starting to become a FAQ... > > dmesg -a works. Thx. > But on another machine dmesg still works: > # dmesg > Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. > ... > icmp-response bandwidth limit 522/200 pps > icmp-response bandwidth limit 861/200 pps > ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > ata0: resetting devices .. done > ad0: UDMA ICRC READ ERROR blk# 13939543 retrying > ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > ata0: resetting devices .. done > > Why it is here normal on one machine and cutted on the other? > And why does it work before ( I'm sure in December it doesn't work like > now )? OK, I'll go into details a little more. Not too long ago, a patch was MFCed that allows logging console output. To allow this, this ouput is written into the kernel message buffer, where it can be picked up by syslog using the /dev/klog interface. Normal kernel output is written to the message buffer as is, while console output is prefixed with a string in the form "", where category is a number (118 in this case, LOG_CONSOLE|LOG_INFO). dmesg will ignore messages that start with such a string indicating that the message didn't come from the kernel unless it is invoked with the -a option. If syslogd is configured to echo some messages to the console, those messages will be appended to the kernel message buffer, and if this happens too often, this will overwrite all the kernel messages. A common situation is that a lot of kernel messages are generated that fill up the message buffer, syslog snarfs those a little later, writes them to the console and thus overwrites the original kernel messages in turn. dmesg will show nothing in this case, or, more often, a line that came from the console, but of which the first character(s) were overwritten by a new message (they don't start with a "" magic string then, and dmesg will print them). So, dmesg will work as expected on machines that didn't generate enough messages yet, or on systems from before the MFC. - thomas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 9:26: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from postal.incyte.com (postal.incyte.com [198.31.37.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E43337B72A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:25:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bl@incyte.com) Received: from blah.incyte.com (blah.incyte.com [10.99.1.40]) by postal.incyte.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2KHPoM14794 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:25:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from blah.incyte.com (bl@localhost) by blah.incyte.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA04278 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:25:51 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103201725.JAA04278@blah.incyte.com> X-Authentication-Warning: blah.incyte.com: bl owned process doing -bs To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ahc - Invalidating pack Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:25:51 -0800 From: "Brett G. Lemoine" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG OK, I need help. I'm starting to suspect either FreeBSD just doesn't like my motherboard (a Tyan S1837 Thunderbolt), or that I've got a flaky on-board scsi controller. I've been getting the following errors on both my internal disks (and ocasionally on my jaz drive as well): I note that in the code (cam/scsi/scsi_da.c), that this is a 'catastrophic error'. The error messages appear to be coming from ahc_timeout in dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_freebsd.c, but I'm not familure enough with the code (or PC hardware for that matter) to determine why. Can someone help me determine what I need to do to more conclusively pin this on the on-board scsi controller (or if it's not that, determine what the problem is)? FWIW, I'm running 4.3-BETA updated as of yesterday afternoon with an _unchanged_ GENERIC kernel. boot dmesg is below the errors. Thanks for any assistance you can provide. A few days ago -- jaz drive: Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: (da2:ahc1:0:6:0): SCB 0x3 - timed out in Data-out phase, SEQADDR == 0x8 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: STACK == 0x3, 0x110, 0x166, 0x0 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: ahc1: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x8 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0x6, SSTAT0 0x0 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: SCB count = 20 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 4 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: Card NEXTQSCB = 4 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: QINFIFO entries: Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: Waiting Queue entries: Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: Disconnected Queue entries: 0:3 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: QOUTFIFO entries: Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: Sequencer Free SCB List: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: Pending list: 3 Mar 16 18:10:00 blur /kernel: Kernel Free SCB list: 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 13 12 11 10 Mar 16 18:10:01 blur /kernel: Untagged Q(6): 3 Mar 16 18:10:01 blur /kernel: sg[0] - Addr 0xca3a900 : Length 8 Mar 16 18:10:01 blur /kernel: (da2:ahc1:0:6:0): Queuing a BDR SCB Mar 16 18:10:01 blur /kernel: (da2:ahc1:0:6:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent Mar 16 18:10:01 blur /kernel: (da2:ahc1:0:6:0): no longer in timeout, status = 3 4b Mar 16 18:10:01 blur /kernel: ahc1: Bus Device Reset on A:6. 1 SCBs aborted Yesterday -- root disk: Mar 19 15:02:40 blur /kernel: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Invalidating pack Mar 19 15:03:41 blur /kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 19 Mar 19 15:03:41 blur /kernel: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 94: Immediate reset. Flags = 0x4040 Mar 19 15:07:11 blur /kernel: nread: 0, reqpage: 0, pindex: 0, pcount: 14 Today -- other disk: Mar 20 09:56:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Invalidating pack Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): SCB 0x80 - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x8 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: STACK == 0x3, 0x110, 0x166, 0x0 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x8 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: SCB count = 130 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 67 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: Card NEXTQSCB = 67 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: QINFIFO entries: Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: Waiting Queue entries: Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: Disconnected Queue entries: 0:105 7:127 24:128 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: QOUTFIFO entries: Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: Sequencer Free SCB List: 17 5 15 4 29 12 9 25 23 3 1 13 19 20 11 28 30 27 16 6 2 14 3 1 26 22 8 21 10 18 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: Pending list: 105 127 128 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: Kernel Free SCB list: 18 100 93 102 109 114 2 129 123 44 11 110 82 1 117 115 119 4 40 66 52 16 104 31 101 92 116 126 112 53 30 15 55 113 29 124 12 9 58 25 111 21 103 108 118 54 20 28 39 10 0 125 120 6 26 51 69 50 47 32 106 59 7 42 68 37 46 8 33 3 17 48 56 41 5 35 24 27 57 23 19 91 43 34 10 7 49 14 36 13 45 22 38 121 122 90 94 95 96 97 98 99 80 81 64 63 62 61 60 79 78 7 7 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 65 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: sg[0] - Addr 0x9387c00 : Length 1024 Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Queuing a BDR SCB Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): no longer in timeout, status = 3 4a Mar 20 09:57:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Invalidating pack Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): SCB 0x69 - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x8 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: STACK == 0x3, 0x110, 0x166, 0x0 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x8 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: SCB count = 130 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 67 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: Card NEXTQSCB = 67 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: QINFIFO entries: Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: Waiting Queue entries: Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: Disconnected Queue entries: 0:105 7:127 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: QOUTFIFO entries: Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: Sequencer Free SCB List: 24 17 5 15 4 29 12 9 25 2 3 31 13 19 20 11 28 30 27 16 6 2 14 3 1 26 22 8 21 10 18 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: Pending list: 105 127 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: Kernel Free SCB list: 18 128 100 93 102 109 114 2 129 123 44 11 110 82 1 117 115 119 4 40 66 52 16 104 31 101 92 116 126 112 53 30 15 55 113 29 124 12 9 58 25 111 21 103 108 118 54 20 28 39 10 0 125 120 6 26 51 69 50 47 32 106 59 7 42 68 37 46 8 33 3 17 48 56 41 5 35 24 27 57 23 19 91 43 3 4 107 49 14 36 13 45 22 38 121 122 90 94 95 96 97 98 99 80 81 64 63 62 61 60 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 65 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[0] - Addr 0x1b6d8000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[1] - Addr 0x22a59000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[2] - Addr 0x27eba000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[3] - Addr 0x205db000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[4] - Addr 0x1b45c000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[5] - Addr 0x237fd000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[6] - Addr 0x1fade000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[7] - Addr 0x24b7f000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[8] - Addr 0x26aa0000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[9] - Addr 0x28e21000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[10] - Addr 0x27682000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[11] - Addr 0x24c03000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[12] - Addr 0x260c4000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[13] - Addr 0x1b6a5000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[14] - Addr 0x27426000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: sg[15] - Addr 0x24e27000 : Length 4096 Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Queuing a BDR SCB Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): no longer in timeout, status = 3 4a Mar 20 09:58:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Invalidating pack Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): SCB 0x7f - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x8 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: STACK == 0x3, 0x110, 0x166, 0x0 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x8 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: SCB count = 130 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 93 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: Card NEXTQSCB = 93 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: QINFIFO entries: Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: Waiting Queue entries: Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: Disconnected Queue entries: 7:127 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: QOUTFIFO entries: Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: Sequencer Free SCB List: 15 4 5 17 24 0 29 12 9 25 23 31 13 19 20 11 28 30 27 16 6 2 14 3 1 26 22 8 21 10 18 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: Pending list: 127 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: Kernel Free SCB list: 100 102 128 18 105 67 109 11 4 2 129 123 44 11 110 82 1 117 115 119 4 40 66 52 16 104 31 101 92 116 126 112 5 3 30 15 55 113 29 124 12 9 58 25 111 21 103 108 118 54 20 28 39 10 0 125 120 6 2 6 51 69 50 47 32 106 59 7 42 68 37 46 8 33 3 17 48 56 41 5 35 24 27 57 23 19 91 43 34 107 49 14 36 13 45 22 38 121 122 90 94 95 96 97 98 99 80 81 64 63 62 61 60 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 65 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: sg[0] - Addr 0x271b2000 : Length 2048 Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Queuing a BDR SCB Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): no longer in timeout, status = 3 4a Mar 20 09:59:48 blur /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Invalidating pack Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: Mon Mar 19 16:49:41 CST 2001 root@blur.unixshaman.com:/usr/local/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (751.71-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x681 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383fbff real memory = 1073741824 (1048576K bytes) config> di sn0 config> di lnc0 config> di ie0 config> di fe0 config> di ed0 config> di cs0 config> di bt0 config> di aic0 config> di aha0 config> di adv0 config> q avail memory = 1041444864 (1017036K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc044c000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc044c09c. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib2: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 1.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib3 pci2: at 1.0 pci2: at 2.0 pci2: at 3.0 pci2: at 4.0 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xef80-0xef9f irq 11 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered chip1: port 0x440-0x44f at device 7.3 on pci0 ahc0: port 0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xfebfe000-0xfebfefff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 aic7896/97: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs ahc1: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfebff000-0xfebfffff irq 10 at device 11.1 on pci0 aic7896/97: Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs pci0: (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371) at 12.0 irq 9 fxp0: port 0xee80-0xeebf mem 0xfea00000-0xfeafffff,0xfebfd000-0xfebfdfff irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:e0:81:10:c9:0e fxp1: port 0xed80-0xedbf mem 0xfe800000-0xfe8fffff,0xfebfc000-0xfebfcfff irq 5 at device 17.0 on pci0 fxp1: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:73:39:03 pcib1: on motherboard pci3: on pcib1 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0: ppbus0: HP ENHANCED PCL5,PJL,POSTSCRIPT plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master using PIO4 Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 17501MB (35843670 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2231C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 17501MB (35843670 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2231C) cd0 at ahc1 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed da2 at ahc1 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device da2: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) da2: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present bl -- //====== Brett G. Lemoine -=- ===============================\\ || Info. Systems Architect | || ||Core Unix System Services| Practice random acts of intelligence || || Incyte Genomics | & senseless acts of self-control. || || Palo Alto, California | || |+-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+| \\== PGP Key Fingerprint: 68 A1 2A 2D 82 CE E9 70 5B 80 D1 11 EC F3 FB 85 ==// To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 9:43:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2995A37B735 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:43:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Received: from cfcl.com (cpe-24-221-169-54.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.169.54]) by idiom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA89462 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.168.205] (cerberus [192.168.168.205]) by cfcl.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2KHifV58146 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:44:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:32:18 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Rich Morin Subject: RE: installing X11 sources? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sorry about the previous (misaddressed) message, folks. -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - home page, resume, etc. http://www.cfcl.com/Meta/md_fb.html - The FreeBSD Browser email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 10:35:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C447337B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:35:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 27919 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2001 18:31:50 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 18:31:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 466 invoked by uid 145); 20 Mar 2001 18:31:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 18:31:50 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 19:31:50 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Subject: NFS performance Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We're making plans to upgrade our NFS server to FreeBSD-4.3 (including new disks...) and I would like to ask about the status of NFS v3? Currently, a standard NFS mount (4.3BETA) gives us a sequential writing speed of approx. 2Mb/s (just 400Mb dd'd data, IBM DTLA-307045 with softupdates) and reading speed of 9Mb/s (the maximum). Mounting via TCP gives us 2.5Mb/s. (Is this safe?) Are there any other possibilities to increase the writing speed (by means of tuning NFS...)? regards Jan -- Physikalisches Institut der Universitaet Bonn Nussallee 12 D-53115 Bonn GERMANY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 10:46:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4035137B71C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:46:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2KIjso09150; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:45:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:45:54 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Jan Conrad Cc: Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Jan Conrad wrote: > We're making plans to upgrade our NFS server to FreeBSD-4.3 (including > new disks...) and I would like to ask about the status of NFS v3? Why do you need NFSv3? Are there particular features in NFSv3 that you need or are you just guessing that v2 > v3 and therefore better? > Currently, a standard NFS mount (4.3BETA) gives us a sequential writing > speed of approx. 2Mb/s (just 400Mb dd'd data, IBM DTLA-307045 with > softupdates) and reading speed of 9Mb/s (the maximum). What is the speed of your network? > Mounting via TCP gives us 2.5Mb/s. (Is this safe?) Why are you using TCP? If you are on a reliable LAN, use UDP. TCP should be used for long haul NFS. There are lots of reasons for using UDP, if you want me to go into them, I will. > Are there any other possibilities to increase the writing speed (by means > of tuning NFS...)? Again, try UDP. Also, go pick up the O'Reilly book on NFS and NIS. Alot of what I'm going to tell you is in there (indeed the book is on my desk at work). -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 10:52: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6F637B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:52:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2KIoIu10432; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:50:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:50:18 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Jimmy Olgeni Cc: Subject: Re: kernel panic on 4-stable (filesystem related) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > I was sorting a large file with "sort" and ran out of space on / > (filled up /tmp). Were you doing this as root? What's the reserved percentage on / ? -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 10:53:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E632C37B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:53:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2KIq3Y10820; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:52:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:52:03 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Peter van Dijk Cc: Subject: Re: weird bug with vn In-Reply-To: <20010320023642.B292@dataloss.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't suggest using: tar czf foo.tgz * Either. -gordon On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote: > I basically did: > # vnconfig vn0 /tmp/wuh.flp > # mount /dev/vn0c /tmp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 10:54:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E50137B71A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:54:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2KIs5P24224; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:54:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:54:04 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Gordon Tetlow Cc: Jan Conrad , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS performance Message-ID: <20010320105404.D29888@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from gordont@bluemtn.net on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 10:45:54AM -0800 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Gordon Tetlow [010320 10:47] wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Jan Conrad wrote: > > > We're making plans to upgrade our NFS server to FreeBSD-4.3 (including > > new disks...) and I would like to ask about the status of NFS v3? > > Why do you need NFSv3? Are there particular features in NFSv3 that you > need or are you just guessing that v2 > v3 and therefore better? > > > Currently, a standard NFS mount (4.3BETA) gives us a sequential writing > > speed of approx. 2Mb/s (just 400Mb dd'd data, IBM DTLA-307045 with > > softupdates) and reading speed of 9Mb/s (the maximum). > > What is the speed of your network? > > > Mounting via TCP gives us 2.5Mb/s. (Is this safe?) > > Why are you using TCP? If you are on a reliable LAN, use UDP. TCP should > be used for long haul NFS. There are lots of reasons for using UDP, if you > want me to go into them, I will. > > > Are there any other possibilities to increase the writing speed (by means > > of tuning NFS...)? > > Again, try UDP. Also, go pick up the O'Reilly book on NFS and NIS. Alot of > what I'm going to tell you is in there (indeed the book is on my desk at > work). Actually, from what I've been told, TCP allows for much larger requests than what UDP does, afaik UDP maxes out at 8k while tcp should be able to go to 32k (maybe 64k) and give possibly better performance. Plus each time you 'hickup' under a UDP mount it's a lot more painful because since it's possible for each RPC to be broken into several packets you have a lot more retransmition to do. However, as the manpages and sysadmin books say, NFS tuning is a black art and results under various setting may vary wildly. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 11: 0: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DD337B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:00:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2KIxLK12604; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:59:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:59:21 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Jan Conrad , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: <20010320105404.D29888@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Actually, from what I've been told, TCP allows for much larger requests > than what UDP does, afaik UDP maxes out at 8k while tcp should be able > to go to 32k (maybe 64k) and give possibly better performance. This is true. I'm used to working with nfs transaction sizes of < 500 bytes. > Plus each time you 'hickup' under a UDP mount it's a lot more painful > because since it's possible for each RPC to be broken into several > packets you have a lot more retransmition to do. Yup. This is why a reliable (switched) LAN is needed. > However, as the manpages and sysadmin books say, NFS tuning is a > black art and results under various setting may vary wildly. It's very application specific which is why no single formula works. Reading up on the subject is definitely required. -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 11: 1: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADC537B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:00:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2KJ0n195878; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:00:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:00:49 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103201900.f2KJ0n195878@earth.backplane.com> To: Gordon Tetlow Cc: Jan Conrad , Subject: Re: NFS performance References: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Putting on my NFS hat... I would not recommend NFSv2 to anyone. Everyone should be using NFSv3 at this point. It just does a much better job at everything, including and most especially at writing. TCP mounts are useful, and much safer, if you need to export NFS across a firewall. Otherwise I'd recommend sticking with UDP. -Matt :On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Jan Conrad wrote: : :> We're making plans to upgrade our NFS server to FreeBSD-4.3 (including :> new disks...) and I would like to ask about the status of NFS v3? : :Why do you need NFSv3? Are there particular features in NFSv3 that you :need or are you just guessing that v2 > v3 and therefore better? : :> Currently, a standard NFS mount (4.3BETA) gives us a sequential writing :> speed of approx. 2Mb/s (just 400Mb dd'd data, IBM DTLA-307045 with :> softupdates) and reading speed of 9Mb/s (the maximum). : :What is the speed of your network? : :> Mounting via TCP gives us 2.5Mb/s. (Is this safe?) : :Why are you using TCP? If you are on a reliable LAN, use UDP. TCP should :be used for long haul NFS. There are lots of reasons for using UDP, if you :want me to go into them, I will. : :> Are there any other possibilities to increase the writing speed (by means :> of tuning NFS...)? : :Again, try UDP. Also, go pick up the O'Reilly book on NFS and NIS. Alot of :what I'm going to tell you is in there (indeed the book is on my desk at :work). : :-gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 11: 3:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839D337B71C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:03:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Received: from cfcl.com (cpe-24-221-169-54.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.169.54]) by idiom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA38337 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:03:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.168.205] (cerberus [192.168.168.205]) by cfcl.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2KJ4QV59595 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:04:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:53:23 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Rich Morin Subject: Re: NFS performance Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:45 AM -0800 3/20/01, Gordon Tetlow wrote: >Why are you using TCP? If you are on a reliable LAN, use UDP. TCP should >be used for long haul NFS. There are lots of reasons for using UDP, if you >want me to go into them, I will. Although TCP imposes some overhead, it may provide better worst-case performance than UDP. Several years ago, I chatted with a friend (Stan Hanks, IIRC) who had been trying to figure out why X terminals were doing better than diskless workstations. It turned out that, when the Ethernet started to get overloaded, some packets would get lost. The (UDP-based) NFS code would then attempt to re-transmit the entire 8 KB block. Given that the net was already overloaded, this would typically fail. The X terminals, meanwhile, were able to get their packets through. It seems to me that TCP-based NFS would fare better in this scenario, because it would only retransmit Ethernet packets. I'm not sure whether the moral of this story is to use NFS, however; a more reasonable strategy might be to ensure that the net never gets that heavily loaded! -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - home page, resume, etc. http://www.cfcl.com/Meta/md_fb.html - The FreeBSD Browser email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 11: 6:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABAF37B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:06:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2KIeZK23837; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:40:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:40:35 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jan Conrad Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS performance Message-ID: <20010320104034.B29888@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 07:31:50PM +0100 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jan Conrad [010320 10:36] wrote: > We're making plans to upgrade our NFS server to FreeBSD-4.3 (including > new disks...) and I would like to ask about the status of NFS v3? > > Currently, a standard NFS mount (4.3BETA) gives us a sequential writing > speed of approx. 2Mb/s (just 400Mb dd'd data, IBM DTLA-307045 with > softupdates) and reading speed of 9Mb/s (the maximum). > Are you _really_ using version _3_? (3 should give better than 2MB/sec writes) > Mounting via TCP gives us 2.5Mb/s. (Is this safe?) > > Are there any other possibilities to increase the writing speed (by means > of tuning NFS...)? Have you tried upping the number of the -w and -r tunables? How many nfsiods do you have running on the client? How many nfsds on the server? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 11:11:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EB537B71B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:11:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2KJBAR96066; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:11:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:11:10 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103201911.f2KJBAR96066@earth.backplane.com> To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Gordon Tetlow , Jan Conrad , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS performance References: <20010320105404.D29888@fw.wintelcom.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Actually, from what I've been told, TCP allows for much larger requests :than what UDP does, afaik UDP maxes out at 8k while tcp should be able :to go to 32k (maybe 64k) and give possibly better performance. : :Plus each time you 'hickup' under a UDP mount it's a lot more painful :because since it's possible for each RPC to be broken into several :packets you have a lot more retransmition to do. Depends on what kind of LAN you have. A standard 100BaseT network still has a 1536 byte packet size limit, so even 8K UDP NFS packets will be fragmented. The fragmentation is avoided with TCP, even though as many packets will be sent. This is why TCP mounts tend to have very comparable performance to UDP mounts. Under very heavily loaded conditions TCP could very well be the better choice because the TCP layer handles load a whole lot better then the NFS udp/timeout/retry layer and the kernel isn't really tuned to deal with hundreds of clients all sending fragmented packets at the same time. I wouldn't bother with larger NFS block sizes, even over TCP, unless you are running a much faster LAN (e.g. gigabit). -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 11:56:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mgate11.so-net.ne.jp (mgate11.so-net.ne.jp [210.139.254.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6995A37B71D for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:56:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp) Received: from mail.ya3.so-net.ne.jp (mspool11.so-net.ne.jp [210.139.248.11]) by mgate11.so-net.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W01031514) with ESMTP id EAA20914 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 04:56:32 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (pd5cee2.kngwnt01.ap.so-net.ne.jp [202.213.206.226]) by mail.ya3.so-net.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W01022316) with ESMTP id EAA14497 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 04:56:31 +0900 (JST) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA From: Yoshihiro Koya X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010321050330K.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:03:30 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 55 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I have a question about CPUTYPE of 4.3-BETA. My environment is FreeBSD presario.my.domain 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: \ Thu Mar 15 13:09:40 JST 2001 \ root@presario.my.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/presario i386 I cvsup'd at Tue Mar 20 10:14:12 UTC 2001. I also set CPUTYPE flag as CPUTYPE=k6-2 in my /etc/make.conf. And I did make world and make buildkernel. Usual commands like cc or csh were compiled with the flag: For example, I had ===> cc1 cc -O -pipe -march=k6 -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\"/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr\" -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1/../../../../contrib/gcc -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1/../../../../contrib/gcc/config -I. -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-lang.c However, in the case which I did make buildkernel, I had something like: cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/../include -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c Please note that there is no -march=6k in that session. On the other hand, when I made kernel modules, I obtained again as follows: ===> wi cc -O -pipe -march=k6 -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/wi/../../i386/isa/if_wi.c Is it correct behavior of the standard make world/buildkernel on 4.3-BETA? Or, does something go wrong? I also set the same flag as CPUTYPE=k6-2 for -current box (the box is actually dual boot one). When I make world/buildkernel for -current, I always see -march=k6 flag, however. koya To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:14:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cpqdl380-7.wac.com (mail.worldaccesscomm.net [206.151.39.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4F837B725 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:13:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from josh@corp.wac.com) Received: from CJ7 (unverified [206.151.38.12]) by cpqdl380-7.wac.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.4) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:13:54 -0800 From: "Josh Benton" To: Subject: XFree86-4 port problems Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:13:30 -0800 Message-ID: <000001c0b17a$3c9be4f0$0c2697ce@CJ7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am having problems getting the lastest XFree86-4 port to run. It builds/installs fine, but I am not able to run 'X -configure' or 'startx'. I have a Dell OptiPlex GX110 with an i810 card. I have re-compiled my kernel with agp support and have added /dev/agpgart. Here is the output of my X log. FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE XFree86-4 [4.0.3] (from the ports collection) <<>> XFree86 Version 4.0.3 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400) Release Date: 16 March 2001 If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) Operating System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 [ELF] Module Loader present (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Tue Mar 20 11:59:26 2001 (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 2.0) (--) using VT number 9 (II) Module ABI versions: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1 XFree86 Video Driver: 0.3 XFree86 XInput driver : 0.1 XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1 XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.2 (II) Loader running on freebsd (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x00000000, mode1Res1 = 0x80000000 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 8086,7124 card 1028,00b4 rev 03 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 8086,7125 card 1028,00b4 rev 03 class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:1e:0: chip 8086,2418 card 0000,0000 rev 02 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:1f:0: chip 8086,2410 card 0000,0000 rev 02 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:1f:1: chip 8086,2411 card 8086,2411 rev 02 class 01,01,80 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:1f:2: chip 8086,2412 card 8086,2412 rev 02 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:1f:3: chip 8086,2413 card 8086,2413 rev 02 class 0c,05,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 01:07:0: chip 1274,1371 card 1274,1371 rev 09 class 04,01,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 01:0c:0: chip 10b7,9200 card 1028,00b4 rev 78 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: End of PCI scan (II) LoadModule: "scanpci" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a (II) Module scanpci: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) UnloadModule: "scanpci" (II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge: (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (-1,0,0), BCTRL: 0x00 (VGA_EN is cleared) (II) Bus 0 I/O range: [0] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B] (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:30:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x06 (VGA_EN is cleared) (II) Bus 1 I/O range: [0] -1 0x0000e000 - 0x0000e0ff (0x100) IX[B] [1] -1 0x0000e400 - 0x0000e4ff (0x100) IX[B] [2] -1 0x0000e800 - 0x0000e8ff (0x100) IX[B] [3] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ecff (0x100) IX[B] (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0xfd000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x2000000) MX[B] (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0xf9000000 - 0xf9ffffff (0x1000000) MX[B] (II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:31:0), (0,-1,0), BCTRL: 0x00 (VGA_EN is cleared) (II) Bus -1 I/O range: (II) Bus -1 non-prefetchable memory range: (II) Bus -1 prefetchable memory range: (--) PCI:*(0:1:0) Intel i810e rev 3, Mem @ 0xf4000000/26, 0xff000000/19 List of video drivers: atimisc r128 radeon mga glint nv tga s3virge sis rendition neomagic i740 tdfx savage cirrus tseng trident chips apm fbdev i128 ati i810 ark cyrix siliconmotion vesa vga (II) LoadModule: "atimisc" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.o (II) Module ati: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 6.2.3 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "r128" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o (II) Module r128: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 4.0.1 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "radeon" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o (II) Module radeon: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 4.0.1 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "mga" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o (II) Module mga: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "glint" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o (II) Module glint: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "nv" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nv_drv.o (II) Module nv: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "tga" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o (II) Module tga: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "s3virge" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.o (II) Module s3virge: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.6.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "sis" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/sis_drv.o (II) Module sis: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.6.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "rendition" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/rendition_drv.o (II) Module rendition: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 4.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "neomagic" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/neomagic_drv.o (II) Module neomagic: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "i740" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i740_drv.o (II) Module i740: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "tdfx" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tdfx_drv.o (II) Module tdfx: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "savage" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o (II) Module savage: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.1.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "cirrus" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_drv.o (II) Module cirrus: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "tseng" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tseng_drv.o (II) Module tseng: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "trident" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/trident_drv.o (II) Module trident: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "chips" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o (II) Module chips: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "apm" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/apm_drv.o (II) Module apm: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "fbdev" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o (II) Module fbdev: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "i128" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i128_drv.o (II) Module i128: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "ati" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.o (II) Module ati: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 6.2.3 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "i810" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o (II) Module i810: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "ark" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ark_drv.o (II) Module ark: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.5.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "cyrix" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cyrix_drv.o (II) Module cyrix: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "siliconmotion" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/siliconmotion_drv.o (II) Module siliconmotion: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.2.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "vesa" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o (II) Module vesa: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) LoadModule: "vga" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vga_drv.o (II) Module vga: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 4.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) Addressable bus resource ranges are [0] -1 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B] [1] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B] (II) OS-reported resource ranges: [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [5] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E (II) Active PCI resource ranges: [0] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E [1] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E [2] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) [3] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) [4] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ecff (0x100) IX[B]E [5] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E [6] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E [7] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ffff (0x80) IX[B]E [8] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E (II) PCI I/O resource overlap reduced 0x0000ec00 from 0x0000ecff to 0x0000ec7f (II) PCI I/O resource overlap reduced 0x0000ff80 from 0x0000ffff to 0x0000ff9f (II) Active PCI resource ranges after removing overlaps: [0] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E [1] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E [2] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) [3] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) [4] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ec7f (0x80) IX[B]E [5] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E [6] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E [7] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ff9f (0x20) IX[B]E [8] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E (II) OS-reported resource ranges after removing overlaps with PCI: [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [5] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E (II) All system resource ranges: [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [5] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E [6] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E [7] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) [8] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) [9] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E [10] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ec7f (0x80) IX[B]E [11] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E [12] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E [13] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ff9f (0x20) IX[B]E [14] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:01:0 S3VProbe begin (II) Loading sub module "cirrus_laguna" (II) LoadModule: "cirrus_laguna" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_laguna.o (II) Module cirrus_laguna: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) Loading sub module "cirrus_alpine" (II) LoadModule: "cirrus_alpine" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_alpine.o (II) Module cirrus_alpine: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 (II) ATI: Shared non-ATI VGA in PCI/AGP slot 0:1:0 detected. (II) I810: Driver for Intel i810 chipset: i810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815 CYRIX: Device Sections found: 1 (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa (II) VGA: Generic VGA driver (version 4.0) for chipsets: generic (++) Using config file: "/root/XF86Config.new" Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (??) unknown. (==) ServerLayout "XFree86 Configured" (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" (**) | |-->Device "Card0" (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" (**) FontPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/X11R6/ lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/ ,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" (--) Chipset i810e found (II) resource ranges after xf86ClaimFixedResources() call: [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [5] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E [6] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E [7] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) [8] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) [9] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E [10] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ec7f (0x80) IX[B]E [11] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E [12] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E [13] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ff9f (0x20) IX[B]E [14] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E (II) resource ranges after probing: [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [5] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E [6] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E [7] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) [8] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) [9] 0 0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B] [10] 0 0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B] [11] 0 0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B] [12] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E [13] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ec7f (0x80) IX[B]E [14] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E [15] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E [16] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ff9f (0x20) IX[B]E [17] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E [18] 0 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B] [19] 0 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B] (II) Setting vga for screen 0. (II) Loading sub module "vgahw" (II) LoadModule: "vgahw" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libvgahw.a (II) Module vgahw: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_laguna.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86Int10AllocPages from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol shadowUpdatePacked from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol shadowUpdatePacked from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol shadowUpdatePlanar4x8 from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol shadowUpdatePlanar4 from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol shadowAlloc from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86Int10AllocPages from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol XAAPixmapOps from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/apm_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol XAAPixmapOps from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/apm_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol XAAPixmapOps from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/apm_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/trident_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tdfx_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/neomagic_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/neomagic_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/neomagic_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmSiSAgpInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/sis_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol XAAGCIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol XAAGCIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacFreeRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacHandleColormaps from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol BTramdacProbe from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacDestroyInfoRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol TIramdacCalculateMNPForClock from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol XAAMoveDWORDS_FixedBase from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol XAAMoveDWORDS_FixedBase from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol TIramdacCalculateMNPForClock from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol IBMramdac640CalculateMNPCForClock from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol IBMramdac526CalculateMNPCForClock from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol IBMramdac526CalculateMNPCForClock from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol IBMramdac526CalculateMNPCForClock from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol IBMramdac526CalculateMNPCForClock from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacFreeRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacHandleColormaps from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacDestroyInfoRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol IBMramdacProbe from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacDestroyInfoRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol TIramdacProbe from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacDestroyInfoRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol TIramdacLoadPalette from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128ResetCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128ResetCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128WaitForIdleCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128ResetCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmAgpVendorId from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmAgpDeviceId from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128InitCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmR128CleanupCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmAgpUnbind from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol XAA_888_plus_PICT_a8_to_8888 from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol DRIGetDrawableStamp from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol DRIGetDrawableInfo from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nv_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nv_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nv_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86Int10AllocPages from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86Int10FreePages from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol XAAInitDualFramebufferOverlay from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol fbdevHWSetVideoModes from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol fbdevHWGetLineLength from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol fbdevHWGetType from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol fbdevHWGetLineLength from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol fbdevHWLinearOffset from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol fbdevHWGetType from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol fbdevHWGetType from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol fbdevHWDPMSSet from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/siliconmotion_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/siliconmotion_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/siliconmotion_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_alpine.o is unresolved! Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send the full server output, not just the last messages. This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log". Please report problems to xfree86@xfree86.org. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:17:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-28.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DDE37B72A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:17:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0569866BDE; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:17:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:17:26 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Yoshihiro Koya Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010321050330K.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010321050330K.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp>; from Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:03:30AM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:03:30AM +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > Is it correct behavior of the standard make world/buildkernel on 4.3-BETA? > Or, does something go wrong? CPUTYPE isn't currently used for building the kernel on 4.x. I've patched it to do so on -current, but haven't merged the changes. > I also set the same flag as CPUTYPE=k6-2 for -current box > (the box is actually dual boot one). > When I make world/buildkernel for -current, I always see > -march=k6 flag, however. That is correct, gcc doesn't separately support the k6-2, and the name is just provided for convenience. Kris --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6t7rWWry0BWjoQKURAlbNAKCDw+GlrYaqbKYt5pTm2rSbU2LzuQCZAXjf p+q/czG3ISuzCMJrvgnCVvI= =jNzm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:31:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wombat.matrixtek.net (mimatrix-2.iserv.net [206.114.39.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7172B37B73C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:31:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from platypus@wombat.matrixtek.net) Received: from localhost (platypus@localhost) by wombat.matrixtek.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08391 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:52:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from platypus@wombat.matrixtek.net) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:52:07 -0500 (EST) From: Jason Fuller To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just a note about that stupid toner spam that came through today. toll free numbers cost companies somethin' aweful most of the time. (Though I'm not suggesting each of us call that number and complain about the spam, it might convince said company that spammers aren't good company to keep.) Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! -- http://www.cauce.org VirusScan Detected Windows: (A)bort, (D)elete, (F)ormat C: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:33:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp.wanadoo.nl [194.134.193.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D7537B750 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:33:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steveo@eircom.net) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (p0808.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.202.45]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f2KKXbq22406; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:33:37 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:33:34 +0100 From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" To: kstewart@urx.com Cc: martini@invision.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Message-Id: <20010320213334.56106fcd.steveo@eircom.net> In-Reply-To: <3AB6E25E.F4F2FD6E@urx.com> References: <3AB6E25E.F4F2FD6E@urx.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.60 (GTK+ 1.2.8; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA; i386) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:53:50 -0800 Kent Stewart wrote: KS> > - -RELEASE branch doesn't change. To my mind this is all backwards. KS> Not in my mind. The -release branch always has something wrong with it But -release is *not* a branch, it is a point. It cannot change, it exists on vast numbers of CDs, the release is what got burned on all those CDs. -- Life is complex - it has real and imaginary parts. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:34:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2410F37B73C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:34:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from juha@saarinen.org) Received: from dendennis.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.2] helo=DENDENNIS) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14fSpb-0008H9-00; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:34:15 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: "Jason Fuller" , Subject: RE: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:34:17 +1200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The spammer might be the notorious Sam Khuri, who I understand got into severe trouble for his activities. The message with headers should be forwarded to the appropriate authorities. -- Juha :: -----Original Message----- :: From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG :: [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Jason Fuller :: Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 8:52 AM :: To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org :: Subject: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through :: :: :: Just a note about that stupid toner spam that came through today. toll :: free numbers cost companies somethin' aweful most of the time. (Though :: I'm not suggesting each of us call that number and complain about the :: spam, it might convince said company that spammers aren't good company to :: keep.) :: :: Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! -- http://www.cauce.org :: :: VirusScan Detected Windows: (A)bort, (D)elete, (F)ormat C: :: :: :: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org :: with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message :: :: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:40:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mgate10.so-net.ne.jp (mgate10.so-net.ne.jp [210.139.254.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5644D37B71C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:40:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp) Received: from mail.ya3.so-net.ne.jp (mspool11.so-net.ne.jp [210.139.248.11]) by mgate10.so-net.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W01031514) with ESMTP id FAA13747; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:38:25 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (pee7aa7.kngwnt01.ap.so-net.ne.jp [202.238.122.167]) by mail.ya3.so-net.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W01022316) with ESMTP id FAA23034; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:38:24 +0900 (JST) To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA From: Yoshihiro Koya In-Reply-To: <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010321050330K.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010321054522A.ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:45:22 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 26 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks for your immediate reply. From: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:17:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:03:30AM +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > > > Is it correct behavior of the standard make world/buildkernel on 4.3-BETA? > > Or, does something go wrong? > > CPUTYPE isn't currently used for building the kernel on 4.x. I've > patched it to do so on -current, but haven't merged the changes. I can understand that CPUTYPE isn't used for building the kernel on 4-stable. Thanks. But, I have still a question. The compilation of the kernel itself is free from the effects of CPUTYPE, but the kernel modules may be compiled with -march=SOMECPU as I repoted in my previous message. It seems to cause some inconsistency in the future, I guess. Is my thought wrong? koya To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:49:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from daconcepts.dyndns.org (wks-166-129-114.kscable.com [24.166.129.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A7337B71A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:49:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from natedac@kscable.com) Received: from localhost (natedac@localhost) by daconcepts.dyndns.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2KKeUs49075 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:40:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from natedac@kscable.com) X-Authentication-Warning: daconcepts.dyndns.org: natedac owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:40:30 -0600 (CST) From: Nate Dannenberg X-X-Sender: To: Subject: RE: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Juha Saarinen wrote: > The spammer might be the notorious Sam Khuri, who I understand got into > severe trouble for his activities. The message with headers should be > forwarded to the appropriate authorities. On looking this guy's header over, it looks like it originates from musak.com, but there is no root@ or abuse@ there. There appears to be a postmaster@ though. -- /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___~~~~~\ | natedac@kscable.com //Z@|___ | | http://home.kscable.com/natedac |'(__ [_< | \_C64/C128_-_What's_*YOUR*_hobby?__\___|____/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:52:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marvin.impulz.net (marvin.impulz.net [209.213.67.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D00C37B71B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:52:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from don@impulz.net) Received: from impulz.net (velma.impulz.net [209.213.67.65]) by marvin.impulz.net (Switch-2.0.0/Switch-2.0.0) with SMTP id f2KKm7m17470 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:48:07 -0500 Received: from 209.191.12.132 (SquirrelMail authenticated user scanman) by webmail2.impulz.net with HTTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:48:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3648.209.191.12.132.985124886.squirrel@webmail2.impulz.net> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:48:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: subscribe From: "Don Campbell" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: don@impulz.net X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.0.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:58:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F254637B718 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:58:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from juha@saarinen.org) Received: from dendennis.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.2] helo=DENDENNIS) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14fTA0-0008IN-01; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:55:20 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: "Nate Dannenberg" , Subject: RE: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:55:21 +1200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :: On looking this guy's header over, it looks like it originates from :: musak.com, but there is no root@ or abuse@ there. There appears to be a :: postmaster@ though. Muzak.com lives in an ATT.net netblock, but it looks like it was used as an anonymous relay. Excellent. :-( -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:59:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wombat.matrixtek.net (mimatrix-2.iserv.net [206.114.39.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0957D37B71C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:59:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from platypus@wombat.matrixtek.net) Received: from localhost (platypus@localhost) by wombat.matrixtek.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08490; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:16:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from platypus@wombat.matrixtek.net) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:16:16 -0500 (EST) From: Jason Fuller To: Nate Dannenberg Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Juha Saarinen wrote: > > On looking this guy's header over, it looks like it originates from > musak.com, but there is no root@ or abuse@ there. There appears to be a > postmaster@ though. Actually, dig a little deeper. Received: from 209.208.45.16 by muddywaters.muzak.com BTW: muzak.com runs an NT server. As for the IP, it resolves to atlnga-as-5-ip-16.atlantic.net. Atlantic.net has a rather strict (ie good) spam policy, but no listed abuse contact. I sent my complaint and full headers to support@atlantic.net. I'm sure they can get it to the right person from there. Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! -- http://www.cauce.org VirusScan Detected Windows: (A)bort, (D)elete, (F)ormat C: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 13: 7: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F0437B71A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:07:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (216-118-21-147.pdq.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F216111337; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:03:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <008701c0b181$418c86c0$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Juha Saarinen" , "Nate Dannenberg" , References: Subject: Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:03:46 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG should be able to mail abuse@att.net and let them know they have this problem. Most companies eventhough it doesn't originate with them will attempt to fix whatever they can. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Juha Saarinen" To: "Nate Dannenberg" ; Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:55 PM Subject: RE: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through > :: On looking this guy's header over, it looks like it originates from > :: musak.com, but there is no root@ or abuse@ there. There appears to be a > :: postmaster@ though. > > Muzak.com lives in an ATT.net netblock, but it looks like it was used as an > anonymous relay. Excellent. :-( > > -- Juha > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 13:11:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6711137B71D for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:11:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from juha@saarinen.org) Received: from dendennis.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.2] helo=DENDENNIS) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14fTMB-0008Jt-01; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:07:55 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: "Jason Fuller" , "Nate Dannenberg" Cc: Subject: RE: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:07:56 +1200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :: Actually, dig a little deeper. :: Received: from 209.208.45.16 by muddywaters.muzak.com :: BTW: muzak.com runs an NT server. :: As for the IP, it resolves to atlnga-as-5-ip-16.atlantic.net. :: Atlantic.net has a rather strict (ie good) spam policy, but no listed :: abuse contact. I sent my complaint and full headers to :: support@atlantic.net. I'm sure they can get it to the right person from :: there. Missed that one, but here are the contacts listed by abuse.net: abuse@atlantic.net postmaster@atlantic.net Sent mine off already. -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 13:22:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDF037B722 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:22:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (216-118-21-147.pdq.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF66411131A; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:52:54 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <006b01c0b17f$bb24fbe0$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Nate Dannenberg" , References: Subject: Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:52:52 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been getting a lot of spam lately from all the freebsd lists, anyone notice that? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nate Dannenberg" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:40 PM Subject: RE: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Juha Saarinen wrote: > > > The spammer might be the notorious Sam Khuri, who I understand got into > > severe trouble for his activities. The message with headers should be > > forwarded to the appropriate authorities. > > On looking this guy's header over, it looks like it originates from > musak.com, but there is no root@ or abuse@ there. There appears to be a > postmaster@ though. > > -- > /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___~~~~~\ > | natedac@kscable.com //Z@|___ | > | http://home.kscable.com/natedac |'(__ [_< | > \_C64/C128_-_What's_*YOUR*_hobby?__\___|____/ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 13:29:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.unixathome.org (ns1.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B21D37B71F for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:29:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (dan@wocker.int.nz.freebsd.org [192.168.0.99]) by ns1.unixathome.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2KLQJb75718; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:26:20 +1200 (NZST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Message-Id: <200103202126.f2KLQJb75718@ns1.unixathome.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: novice in training To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:26:18 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: increased spam levels (was Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through) Reply-To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <006b01c0b17f$bb24fbe0$931576d8@inethouston.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This thread should move to freebsd-chat, reply-to set accordingly. On 20 Mar 2001, at 14:52, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > I've been getting a lot of spam lately from all the freebsd lists, anyone > notice that? Not from the lists, but I have noticed a dramatic increase in spam levels over the past two weeks or so. Especially on old email addresses which I no longer use. Whereas I used to get one or two a week on that address, I'm now getting 2 or 3 a day. Anyone else noticed similar things? -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger dan@unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 13:32:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from web12502.mail.yahoo.com (web12502.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80F9137B721 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:32:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from millioncheese@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010320212554.92803.qmail@web12502.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [129.237.35.38] by web12502.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:25:54 PST Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:25:54 -0800 (PST) From: Tyler McGeorge Reply-To: treznor@sunflower.com Subject: Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through To: "David W. Chapman Jr." , Nate Dannenberg , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <006b01c0b17f$bb24fbe0$931576d8@inethouston.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, I have too. I usually respond to the individual who sent the spam privately, but most of them do not use valid email addresses. Tyler --- "David W. Chapman Jr." wrote: > I've been getting a lot of spam lately from all the > freebsd lists, anyone > notice that? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nate Dannenberg" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:40 PM > Subject: RE: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came > through > > > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Juha Saarinen wrote: > > > > > The spammer might be the notorious Sam Khuri, > who I understand got into > > > severe trouble for his activities. The message > with headers should be > > > forwarded to the appropriate authorities. > > > > On looking this guy's header over, it looks like > it originates from > > musak.com, but there is no root@ or abuse@ there. > There appears to be a > > postmaster@ though. > > > > -- > > /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___~~~~~\ > > | natedac@kscable.com //Z@|___ | > > | http://home.kscable.com/natedac |'(__ [_< | > > \_C64/C128_-_What's_*YOUR*_hobby?__\___|____/ > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of > the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the > message > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 13:38: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gibbon.kungfumonkey.com (dsl254-084-215.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.84.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8447437B71E for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:37:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jolly@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com) Received: from localhost (jolly@localhost) by gibbon.kungfumonkey.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA12360; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:35:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:35:21 -0500 (EST) From: Jacob Frelinger To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: Juha Saarinen , Nate Dannenberg , Subject: Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through In-Reply-To: <008701c0b181$418c86c0$931576d8@inethouston.net> Message-ID: Approved: by Your Mother's Brand Of Detergent X-Archive: No MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > should be able to mail abuse@att.net and let them know they have this > problem. Most companies eventhough it doesn't originate with them will > attempt to fix whatever they can. actualy having worked abuse for AT&T, they are very strict with thier down stream providers. when i was there we infact close to pulling down aols connection a few times, and if it wasn't for forparate's involvement in new jersey, deciding aol spent enough cash to warent us not, they'd have been taken off the net. -- Jacob "I'm Brainy For Zombie Pops" Frelinger Resident Psycho http://www.thecoffinclub.com Jolly at TheCoffinClub dot Com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 13:40:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C340337B720; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:40:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from juha@saarinen.org) Received: from dendennis.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.2] helo=DENDENNIS) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14fTqK-0008L4-01; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:39:04 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: Cc: Subject: RE: increased spam levels (was Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:39:06 +1200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <200103202126.f2KLQJb75718@ns1.unixathome.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :: Not from the lists, but I have noticed a dramatic increase in :: spam levels :: over the past two weeks or so. Especially on old email addresses :: which I no longer use. Whereas I used to get one or two a week on that :: address, I'm now getting 2 or 3 a day. :: :: Anyone else noticed similar things? I've noticed lots on my ancient MSN account (I was on the original beta, and have had it since). Looks like I'll be forced to close it down which is sort of sad. -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 14:15: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gibbon.kungfumonkey.com (dsl254-084-215.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.84.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913AB37B78B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:14:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jolly@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com) Received: from localhost (jolly@localhost) by gibbon.kungfumonkey.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA12438; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:14:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:14:58 -0500 (EST) From: Jacob Frelinger To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: Juha Saarinen , Nate Dannenberg , Subject: Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Approved: by Your Mother's Brand Of Detergent X-Archive: No MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Jacob Frelinger wrote: > actualy having worked abuse for AT&T, they are very strict with thier down > stream providers. when i was there we infact close to pulling down aols > connection a few times, and if it wasn't for forparate's involvement in > new jersey, deciding aol spent enough cash to warent us not, they'd have > been taken off the net. ack. teach me to to double check what list i'm mailing.. sorry for my highly informal and casual attiude there. i though this thread was on a different list that i'm on (similar thread about same spam). a thousand pardons. -- Jacob "I'm Brainy For Zombie Pops" Frelinger Resident Psycho http://www.thecoffinclub.com Jolly at TheCoffinClub dot Com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 14:24:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.tgd.net (rand.tgd.net [64.81.67.117]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B5CD37B723 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:24:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sean@mailhost.tgd.net) Received: (qmail 88931 invoked by uid 1001); 20 Mar 2001 22:24:20 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:24:20 -0800 From: Sean Chittenden To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.3 and mod_perl aren't playing nice together... (was :Re: Apache 1.3.19 does not work out of jail either -- UPDATED) Message-ID: <20010320142420.C88245@rand.tgd.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-PGP-Key: 0x1EDDFAAD X-PGP-Fingerprint: C665 A17F 9A56 286C 5CFB 1DEA 9F4F 5CEF 1EDD FAAD X-Web-Homepage: http://sean.chittenden.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't know if this increases the severity at all, but I can reproduce this on two different machines both using mod_perl, and using either 1.3.19 and 1.3.17. The catch all that's prevented me from taking this to the apache/mod_perl folks is that it builds a-okay on my 4.2 system. Can someone else try to repeat this? -sc (gdb) bt #0 0x2833f550 in sysctl () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 #1 0x28354fde in .cerror () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 #2 0x28354ede in exit () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 #3 0x80bee1c in clean_parent_exit (code=3D0) at http_main.c:2279 #4 0x80c20d9 in main (argc=3D2, argv=3D0xbfbffa1c) at http_main.c:5099 #5 0x805a06b in _start () PS Adding a ServerName directive doesn't fix this. On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 11:58:33AM -0800, Sean Chittenden wrote: > Alright, here's the scenario (I don't use jail and it still breaks): >=20 > rand# perl Makefile.PL APACHE_PREFIX=3D/www/testing APACHE_SRC=3D../apach= e-1.3.19/src DO_HTTPD=3D1 USEA_APACI=3D1 EVERYTHING=3D1 > Will configure via APACI > [... many lines later...] > Creating Makefile in src > + configured for FreeBSD 4.3 platform > + setting C pre-processor to cc -E > + checking for system header files > + adding selected modules > o perl_module uses ConfigStart/End > + mod_perl build type: OBJ > + id: mod_perl/1.25 > + id: Perl/5.00503 (freebsd) [perl] > + setting up mod_perl build environment > + adjusting Apache build environment > + enabling Perl support for SSI (mod_include) > [snip] > rand# make install >=20 > rand# /www/testing/bin/apachectl configtest > Syntax OK > Segmentation fault - core dumped >=20 > rand# ll httpd.core > -rw------- 1 root wheel 823296 Mar 16 11:40 httpd.core >=20 > rand# gdb /www/testing/bin/httpd httpd.core=20 > [snip] > This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"... > (no debugging symbols found)... > Core was generated by `httpd'. > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcrypt.so.2...(no debugging symbols found= )... > done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libperl.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)= ... > done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libm.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...= done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...= done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4...(no debugging symbols found).= .. > done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libutil.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)= ... > done. > Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols fou= nd)... > done. > #0 0x2822f53c in sysctl () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 >=20 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x2822f53c in sysctl () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 > #1 0x28244fca in .cerror () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 > #2 0x28244eca in exit () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 > #3 0x80a6b9f in main () > #4 0x80549c3 in _start () >=20 > (gdb) run > Starting program: /www/testing/bin/httpd=20 > (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... > (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... > (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... > (no debugging symbols found)... > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x2822f53c in sysctl () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 >=20 > And there 'ya have it. I don't know where to begin proding, > but I'll keep the binaries around incase someone else has any > questions or wants more information. -sc >=20 > > I did some looking into this because I had the same problem. > >=20 > > mod_perl + kernel (Tuesday build) =3D problem with sysctl > >=20 > > I'll rebuild apache with mod_perl and see if I can get more > > problems, but I remember looking into it and finding that sysctl() was > > where it wasy dying. Thoughts anyone? -sc >=20 > --=20 > Sean Chittenden sean@chittenden.org --=20 Sean Chittenden sean@chittenden.org --ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjq32JQACgkQn09c7x7d+q1DYwCeJpVLiRZ18I8qod8682C4Oz+t gB8AoNtHmrcbANslI4XGs2osCBOgC5df =oSW5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 14:50:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910AE37B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:50:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roman@harmonic.co.il) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA02200; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:46:41 +0300 To: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ARCH in /etc/make.conf Message-ID: <985128401.3ab7ddd1dff3c@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:46:41 +0300 (IDT) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Roman Shterenzon , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010319020716.B4427@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010319020716.B4427@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Kris Kennaway : > On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 12:44:38PM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > Hi, > > I've noticed that for K6-2 -march=k6 is implied. > > Browsing through gcc code teaches me that ``k6 - doesn't have > pipelines'' > > which is wrong for sure for K6-2. That may explain why -march=pentium > > binaries (played with graphics/xine port) run faster than -march=k6. > > Perhaps it's wiser to set -march=pentium for K6-2 (of course, with > 3DNOW - > > I haven't seen yet what variables are set for benefit of ports like > mpg123) > > Can you produce benchmarks showing that this is the right thing to do? > > Kris > If you tell me how, I'd be glad to help. I played with xine - ran each one many times (in order to eliminate as much as possible the cache, tlb and os cache effects) and watched the dropped frames and other information. This is far from being "good benchmark". Is there're anything related in ports/benchmarks, some new incarnation of wetstone/dhrystone or something? --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 14:51:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gdmckee.local (pc-62-30-209-11-so.blueyonder.co.uk [62.30.209.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E3937B71C; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:51:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@gdmckee.com) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (helo=p300) by gdmckee.local with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14fUxv-000IE4-00; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:50:59 +0000 Message-ID: <000f01c0b190$53c4fe80$0500a8c0@gdmckee.local> From: "G D McKee" To: , "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: References: <200103202126.f2KLQJb75718@ns1.unixathome.org> Subject: Re: increased spam levels (was Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:51:40 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Defiantly getting more spam on the stable mailing list. Gordon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Langille" To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 9:26 PM Subject: increased spam levels (was Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through) > This thread should move to freebsd-chat, reply-to set accordingly. > > On 20 Mar 2001, at 14:52, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > I've been getting a lot of spam lately from all the freebsd lists, anyone > > notice that? > > Not from the lists, but I have noticed a dramatic increase in spam levels > over the past two weeks or so. Especially on old email addresses > which I no longer use. Whereas I used to get one or two a week on that > address, I'm now getting 2 or 3 a day. > > Anyone else noticed similar things? > > -- > Dan Langille > pgpkey - finger dan@unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php > got any work? I'm looking for some. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 15: 7:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.nameplanet.com (mx1.nameplanet.com [213.203.30.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6DC837B71A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:07:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nickhead@folino.com) Received: 20 Mar 2001 23:07:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www3.nameplanet.com) (192.168.2.43) by mail with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 23:07:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 26882 invoked by uid 400); 20 Mar 2001 23:07:49 -0000 Date: 20 Mar 2001 23:07:49 -0000 Message-ID: <20010320230749.26881.qmail@www3.nameplanet.com> From: nickhead@folino.com To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: increased spam levels (was Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that came through) Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Which is worse - dealing with one spam on a list or dealing with the 30 "damn spammers" messages that it generates? Let's get over it guys!! On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:51:40 -0000 "G D McKee" wrote: >Hi > >Defiantly getting more spam on the stable mailing list. > >Gordon >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Dan Langille" >To: "David W. Chapman Jr." >Cc: >Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 9:26 PM >Subject: increased spam levels (was Re: Spam Avenger and Toner spam that >came through) > > >> This thread should move to freebsd-chat, reply-to set accordingly. >> >> On 20 Mar 2001, at 14:52, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: >> >> > I've been getting a lot of spam lately from all the freebsd lists, >anyone >> > notice that? >> >> Not from the lists, but I have noticed a dramatic increase in spam levels >> over the past two weeks or so. Especially on old email addresses >> which I no longer use. Whereas I used to get one or two a week on that >> address, I'm now getting 2 or 3 a day. >> >> Anyone else noticed similar things? >> >> -- >> Dan Langille >> pgpkey - finger dan@unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php >> got any work? I'm looking for some. >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >> >> > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Get your firstname@lastname email for FREE at http://Nameplanet.com/?su To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 15:50:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail1.lig.bellsouth.net (mail1.lig.bellsouth.net [205.152.0.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D5537B737 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:50:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank_s@bellsouth.net) Received: from Cat.nina.org (adsl-78-160-210.gnv.bellsouth.net [216.78.160.210]) by mail1.lig.bellsouth.net (3.3.5alt/0.75.2) with ESMTP id SAA13258; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:55:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:50:08 -0500 (EST) From: Frank Seltzer X-X-Sender: To: Dennis Reiter Cc: Subject: Re: Xircom Cardbus support In-Reply-To: <20010319215501.C86841@reiters.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Dennis Reiter wrote: > This sounds like what I'm struggling with on a Latitude c600. > What do the lines starting with 'pcic' in your dmesg say? pcic0: at port 0x3e0 iomem 0xd0000 irq 11 drq 0 on isa0 pcic0: management irq 13 This is after adding an irq to pcic0 as someone else suggested. > X windows should work. I have 3.3.6 running on an Inspiron 7500 > (shows up as ) > and 4.0.3 running on the Latitude c600 thanks to Paul Richards > (shows up as ) > > -- > Denny Reiter | denny@reiters.org > Madison River Communications | reiterd@madisonriver.net > www.scapegoats.org > This sentence has cabbage six words. > > Frank To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 16: 3:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cpqdl380-7.wac.com (mail.lodinet.com [206.151.38.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEC637B73E for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:03:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from josh@corp.wac.com) Received: from CJ7 (unverified [206.151.38.12]) by cpqdl380-7.wac.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.4) with SMTP id ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:03:22 -0800 From: "Josh Benton" To: "'Kyle Mobley'" Cc: , Subject: RE: XFree86-4 port problems Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:03:00 -0800 Message-ID: <000c01c0b19a$4b507d60$0c2697ce@CJ7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <003e01c0b17c$f2e181a0$9336b018@kyle> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It appears that xf86cfg (X -configure) may be broken in the latest version of XFree86-4. I finally gave up and ran the text mode configurator (xf86config) and now X comes up fine. It only gives me the unresolved symbol messages when "X -configure" is ran. Thanks for all the help everyone! --Josh -----Original Message----- From: Kyle Mobley [mailto:kyle@mobley.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:33 PM To: Josh Benton Subject: Re: XFree86-4 port problems As I'm sure you know, you need to have an /etc/X11/XF86Config file, which can be generated by xf86config or graphically "the way I did mine" by using xf86cfg. It's a real nice GUI for generating the config file. If you still can't get it to work let me know. -Kyle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Benton" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:13 PM Subject: XFree86-4 port problems > I am having problems getting the lastest XFree86-4 port to run. It > builds/installs fine, but I am not able to run 'X -configure' or 'startx'. I > have a Dell OptiPlex GX110 with an i810 card. I have re-compiled my kernel > with agp support and have added /dev/agpgart. Here is the output of my X > log. > > FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE > XFree86-4 [4.0.3] (from the ports collection) > > > <<>> > XFree86 Version 4.0.3 / X Window System > (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400) > Release Date: 16 March 2001 > If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is > newer than the above date, look for a newer version before > reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) > Operating System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 [ELF] > Module Loader present > (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Tue Mar 20 11:59:26 2001 > (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 2.0) > (--) using VT number 9 > > (II) Module ABI versions: > XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1 > XFree86 Video Driver: 0.3 > XFree86 XInput driver : 0.1 > XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1 > XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.2 > (II) Loader running on freebsd > (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a > (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer > ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2 > (II) Loading font Bitmap > (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a > (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.1.0 > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 > (II) PCI: Config type is 1 > (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x00000000, mode1Res1 = 0x80000000 > (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) > (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 8086,7124 card 1028,00b4 rev 03 class 06,00,00 hdr > 00 > (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 8086,7125 card 1028,00b4 rev 03 class 03,00,00 hdr > 00 > (II) PCI: 00:1e:0: chip 8086,2418 card 0000,0000 rev 02 class 06,04,00 hdr > 01 > (II) PCI: 00:1f:0: chip 8086,2410 card 0000,0000 rev 02 class 06,01,00 hdr > 80 > (II) PCI: 00:1f:1: chip 8086,2411 card 8086,2411 rev 02 class 01,01,80 hdr > 00 > (II) PCI: 00:1f:2: chip 8086,2412 card 8086,2412 rev 02 class 0c,03,00 hdr > 00 > (II) PCI: 00:1f:3: chip 8086,2413 card 8086,2413 rev 02 class 0c,05,00 hdr > 00 > (II) PCI: 01:07:0: chip 1274,1371 card 1274,1371 rev 09 class 04,01,00 hdr > 00 > (II) PCI: 01:0c:0: chip 10b7,9200 card 1028,00b4 rev 78 class 02,00,00 hdr > 00 > (II) PCI: End of PCI scan > (II) LoadModule: "scanpci" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a > (II) Module scanpci: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.1.0 > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) UnloadModule: "scanpci" > (II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a > (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: > (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge: > (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: > (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (-1,0,0), BCTRL: 0x00 (VGA_EN is cleared) > (II) Bus 0 I/O range: > [0] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B] > (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: > [0] -1 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B] > (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: > [0] -1 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B] > (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:30:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x06 (VGA_EN is cleared) > (II) Bus 1 I/O range: > [0] -1 0x0000e000 - 0x0000e0ff (0x100) IX[B] > [1] -1 0x0000e400 - 0x0000e4ff (0x100) IX[B] > [2] -1 0x0000e800 - 0x0000e8ff (0x100) IX[B] > [3] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ecff (0x100) IX[B] > (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range: > [0] -1 0xfd000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x2000000) MX[B] > (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range: > [0] -1 0xf9000000 - 0xf9ffffff (0x1000000) MX[B] > (II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:31:0), (0,-1,0), BCTRL: 0x00 (VGA_EN is > cleared) > (II) Bus -1 I/O range: > (II) Bus -1 non-prefetchable memory range: > (II) Bus -1 prefetchable memory range: > (--) PCI:*(0:1:0) Intel i810e rev 3, Mem @ 0xf4000000/26, 0xff000000/19 > List of video drivers: > atimisc > r128 > radeon > mga > glint > nv > tga > s3virge > sis > rendition > neomagic > i740 > tdfx > savage > cirrus > tseng > trident > chips > apm > fbdev > i128 > ati > i810 > ark > cyrix > siliconmotion > vesa > vga > (II) LoadModule: "atimisc" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.o > (II) Module ati: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 6.2.3 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "r128" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > (II) Module r128: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 4.0.1 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "radeon" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o > (II) Module radeon: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 4.0.1 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "mga" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o > (II) Module mga: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "glint" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o > (II) Module glint: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "nv" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nv_drv.o > (II) Module nv: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "tga" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o > (II) Module tga: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "s3virge" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.o > (II) Module s3virge: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.6.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "sis" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/sis_drv.o > (II) Module sis: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.6.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "rendition" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/rendition_drv.o > (II) Module rendition: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 4.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "neomagic" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/neomagic_drv.o > (II) Module neomagic: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "i740" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i740_drv.o > (II) Module i740: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "tdfx" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tdfx_drv.o > (II) Module tdfx: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "savage" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o > (II) Module savage: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.1.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "cirrus" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_drv.o > (II) Module cirrus: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "tseng" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tseng_drv.o > (II) Module tseng: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "trident" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/trident_drv.o > (II) Module trident: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "chips" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o > (II) Module chips: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "apm" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/apm_drv.o > (II) Module apm: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "fbdev" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o > (II) Module fbdev: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.1.0 > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "i128" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i128_drv.o > (II) Module i128: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "ati" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.o > (II) Module ati: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 6.2.3 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "i810" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o > (II) Module i810: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "ark" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ark_drv.o > (II) Module ark: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.5.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "cyrix" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cyrix_drv.o > (II) Module cyrix: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "siliconmotion" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/siliconmotion_drv.o > (II) Module siliconmotion: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.2.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "vesa" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o > (II) Module vesa: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) LoadModule: "vga" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vga_drv.o > (II) Module vga: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 4.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) Addressable bus resource ranges are > [0] -1 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B] > [1] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B] > (II) OS-reported resource ranges: > [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) > [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) > [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] > [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] > [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] > [5] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E > (II) Active PCI resource ranges: > [0] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E > [1] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E > [2] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) > [3] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) > [4] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ecff (0x100) IX[B]E > [5] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E > [6] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E > [7] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ffff (0x80) IX[B]E > [8] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E > (II) PCI I/O resource overlap reduced 0x0000ec00 from 0x0000ecff to > 0x0000ec7f > (II) PCI I/O resource overlap reduced 0x0000ff80 from 0x0000ffff to > 0x0000ff9f > (II) Active PCI resource ranges after removing overlaps: > [0] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E > [1] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E > [2] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) > [3] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) > [4] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ec7f (0x80) IX[B]E > [5] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E > [6] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E > [7] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ff9f (0x20) IX[B]E > [8] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E > (II) OS-reported resource ranges after removing overlaps with PCI: > [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) > [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) > [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] > [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] > [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] > [5] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E > (II) All system resource ranges: > [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) > [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) > [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] > [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] > [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] > [5] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E > [6] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E > [7] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) > [8] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) > [9] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E > [10] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ec7f (0x80) IX[B]E > [11] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E > [12] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E > [13] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ff9f (0x20) IX[B]E > [14] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:01:0 > S3VProbe begin > (II) Loading sub module "cirrus_laguna" > (II) LoadModule: "cirrus_laguna" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_laguna.o > (II) Module cirrus_laguna: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) Loading sub module "cirrus_alpine" > (II) LoadModule: "cirrus_alpine" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_alpine.o > (II) Module cirrus_alpine: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0 > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > (II) ATI: Shared non-ATI VGA in PCI/AGP slot 0:1:0 detected. > (II) I810: Driver for Intel i810 chipset: i810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815 > CYRIX: Device Sections found: 1 > (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa > (II) VGA: Generic VGA driver (version 4.0) for chipsets: generic > (++) Using config file: "/root/XF86Config.new" > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (??) unknown. > (==) ServerLayout "XFree86 Configured" > (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) > (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" > (**) | |-->Device "Card0" > (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" > (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" > (**) FontPath set to > "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/X11R6/ > lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/ > ,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" > (--) Chipset i810e found > (II) resource ranges after xf86ClaimFixedResources() call: > [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) > [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) > [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] > [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] > [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] > [5] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E > [6] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E > [7] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) > [8] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) > [9] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E > [10] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ec7f (0x80) IX[B]E > [11] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E > [12] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E > [13] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ff9f (0x20) IX[B]E > [14] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E > (II) resource ranges after probing: > [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B) > [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B) > [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] > [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] > [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] > [5] -1 0xfe000000 - 0xfeffffff (0x1000000) MX[B]E > [6] -1 0xfdfffc00 - 0xfdffffff (0x400) MX[B]E > [7] -1 0xff000000 - 0xff07ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B) > [8] -1 0xf4000000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B) > [9] 0 0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B] > [10] 0 0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B] > [11] 0 0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B] > [12] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E > [13] -1 0x0000ec00 - 0x0000ec7f (0x80) IX[B]E > [14] -1 0x0000ecc0 - 0x0000ecff (0x40) IX[B]E > [15] -1 0x0000dcd0 - 0x0000dcdf (0x10) IX[B]E > [16] -1 0x0000ff80 - 0x0000ff9f (0x20) IX[B]E > [17] -1 0x0000ffa0 - 0x0000ffbf (0x20) IX[B]E > [18] 0 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B] > [19] 0 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B] > (II) Setting vga for screen 0. > (II) Loading sub module "vgahw" > (II) LoadModule: "vgahw" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libvgahw.a > (II) Module vgahw: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.1.0 > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3 > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_laguna.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86Int10AllocPages from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol shadowUpdatePacked from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol shadowUpdatePacked from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol shadowUpdatePlanar4x8 from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol shadowUpdatePlanar4 from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol shadowAlloc from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86Int10AllocPages from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i128_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol XAAPixmapOps from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/apm_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol XAAPixmapOps from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/apm_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol XAAPixmapOps from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/apm_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/trident_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tdfx_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/neomagic_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/neomagic_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/neomagic_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol drmSiSAgpInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/sis_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol XAAGCIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol XAAGCIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacFreeRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol RamDacHandleColormaps from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol BTramdacProbe from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol RamDacDestroyInfoRec from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/tga_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol TIramdacCalculateMNPForClock from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol XAAMoveDWORDS_FixedBase from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol XAAMoveDWORDS_FixedBase from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol TIramdacCalculateMNPForClock from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol IBMramdac640CalculateMNPCForClock from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol IBMramdac526CalculateMNPCForClock from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol IBMramdac526CalculateMNPCForClock from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol IBMramdac526CalculateMNPCForClock from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol IBMramdac526CalculateMNPCForClock from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacFreeRec from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacHandleColormaps from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacGetHWIndex from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacDestroyInfoRec from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol IBMramdacProbe from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacDestroyInfoRec from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol TIramdacProbe from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacDestroyInfoRec from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol TIramdacLoadPalette from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol RamDacCreateInfoRec from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glint_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86int10Addr from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128ResetCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128ResetCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128WaitForIdleCCE from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128ResetCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmAgpVendorId from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmAgpDeviceId from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol drmR128InitCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StartCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128StopCCE from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol drmR128CleanupCCE from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol drmAgpUnbind from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol XAA_888_plus_PICT_a8_to_8888 from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is > unresolved! > Symbol DRIGetDrawableStamp from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol DRIGetDrawableInfo from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nv_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nv_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nv_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86int10Addr from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol xf86Int10AllocPages from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86Int10FreePages from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/savage_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol XAAInitDualFramebufferOverlay from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/chips_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol fbdevHWSetVideoModes from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol fbdevHWGetLineLength from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol fbdevHWGetType from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol fbdevHWGetLineLength from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol fbdevHWLinearOffset from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol fbdevHWGetType from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol fbdevHWGetType from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol fbdevHWDPMSSet from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o > is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/siliconmotion_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/siliconmotion_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/siliconmotion_drv.o is unresolved! > Symbol xf86SetDDCproperties from module > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_alpine.o is unresolved! > > Fatal server error: > Caught signal 11. Server aborting > > > When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send > the full server output, not just the last messages. > This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log". > Please report problems to xfree86@xfree86.org. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 16:13:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A56337B736 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:13:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA28180; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:43:46 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:43:45 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: KDE2 + XFree4.. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I did what apparently isn't supposed to work.. Built KDE2 against Xfree 3 and the installed XFree4.. It works, but now when I change virtual consoles in wmaker from konqueror to aterm I get image poo on my aterm.. Very odd :) Is that what is meant by it not working? --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 16:24:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85F0B37B71D for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:24:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 19273 invoked by uid 0); 21 Mar 2001 01:24:30 -0000 Received: from dsl1-160.dynacom.net (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 01:24:30 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB7F4BE.96903585@urx.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:24:30 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel O'Connor Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE2 + XFree4.. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > Hi, > I did what apparently isn't supposed to work.. > Built KDE2 against Xfree 3 and the installed XFree4.. > > It works, but now when I change virtual consoles in wmaker from konqueror to aterm I > get image poo on my aterm.. > Very odd :) > > Is that what is meant by it not working? That certainly fits my description of not working :). When it is really bad, startx won't work. Kent > > --- > Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer > for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au > "The nice thing about standards is that there > are so many of them to choose from." > -- Andrew Tanenbaum > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 16:33:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8821C37B71B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:33:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA28679; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:03:11 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3AB7F4BE.96903585@urx.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:03:11 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Kent Stewart Subject: Re: KDE2 + XFree4.. Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21-Mar-01 Kent Stewart wrote: > > get image poo on my aterm.. > > Very odd :) > > Is that what is meant by it not working? > That certainly fits my description of not working :). When it is > really bad, startx won't work. Well, startx won't work because the X binary is no longer setuid so you need to install the xwrapper port (like it says when the XFree-4 port installs :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 16:37:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-28.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B349437B71C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:37:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1A18366C4F; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:37:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:37:09 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ARCH in /etc/make.conf Message-ID: <20010320163708.B26858@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010319020716.B4427@xor.obsecurity.org> <985128401.3ab7ddd1dff3c@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <985128401.3ab7ddd1dff3c@webmail.harmonic.co.il>; from roman@harmonic.co.il on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 01:46:41AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 01:46:41AM +0300, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > Quoting Kris Kennaway : >=20 > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 12:44:38PM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I've noticed that for K6-2 -march=3Dk6 is implied. > > > Browsing through gcc code teaches me that ``k6 - doesn't have > > pipelines'' > > > which is wrong for sure for K6-2. That may explain why -march=3Dpenti= um > > > binaries (played with graphics/xine port) run faster than -march=3Dk6. > > > Perhaps it's wiser to set -march=3Dpentium for K6-2 (of course, with > > 3DNOW - > > > I haven't seen yet what variables are set for benefit of ports like > > mpg123) > >=20 > > Can you produce benchmarks showing that this is the right thing to do? > >=20 > > Kris > >=20 > If you tell me how, I'd be glad to help. > I played with xine - ran each one many times (in order to eliminate as mu= ch as=20 > possible the cache, tlb and os cache effects) and watched the dropped fra= mes=20 > and other information. This is far from being "good benchmark". > Is there're anything related in ports/benchmarks, some new incarnation of= =20 > wetstone/dhrystone or something? Timing the execution of computationally-intensive, repeatable tasks is the way to go here. Remember to recompile everything (libraries and binaries) with the two sets of optimizations so you're comparing things properly, and to run the benchmark several times consecutively on an otherwise quiet system and average the results, discarding the first iteration as it may be affected by CPU or OS-level caching of instructions/data. Things like gzip of a large file, kernel/world buildstones (assuming they're not I/O-dominated), and other CPU-bound tasks should be affected by the different processor optimizations. Kris --mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6t/e0Wry0BWjoQKURAkduAKCZihqhmJq2nZEoo+S6MujDB+QpXQCgqrEG Pgop9faq2RaJEey0kuWVm0k= =mWSE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 16:38:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C976837B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:38:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 20332 invoked by uid 0); 21 Mar 2001 01:38:20 -0000 Received: from dsl1-160.dynacom.net (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 01:38:20 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB7F7FC.65C17BBA@urx.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:38:20 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel O'Connor Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE2 + XFree4.. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 21-Mar-01 Kent Stewart wrote: > > > get image poo on my aterm.. > > > Very odd :) > > > Is that what is meant by it not working? > > That certainly fits my description of not working :). When it is > > really bad, startx won't work. > > Well, startx won't work because the X binary is no longer setuid so you need to > install the xwrapper port (like it says when the XFree-4 port installs :) Nothing to do with that. I'm running as root and logged in as root on the console. It is dying with a message about a bad or missing library. Kent > > --- > Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer > for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au > "The nice thing about standards is that there > are so many of them to choose from." > -- Andrew Tanenbaum -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 16:41:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9B137B71B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:41:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA28895; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:11:08 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3AB7F7FC.65C17BBA@urx.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:11:08 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Kent Stewart Subject: Re: KDE2 + XFree4.. Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21-Mar-01 Kent Stewart wrote: > > Well, startx won't work because the X binary is no longer setuid so you need to > > install the xwrapper port (like it says when the XFree-4 port installs :) > > Nothing to do with that. I'm running as root and logged in as root on > the console. It is dying with a message about a bad or missing > library. Ahh.. What message exactly? (PS logging in as root is bad :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 18:25:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rs5s2.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (rs5s2.datacenter.cha.cantv.net [200.44.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A296137B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:25:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jbolivar@cantv.net) Received: from jbolivar (as2r9-014.ras.cha.cantv.net [200.44.8.14]) by rs5s2.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (8.10.2/8.10.2/2.0) with SMTP id f2L2PRQ24586 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:25:28 -0400 From: "Julian Bolivar" To: Subject: Samba en FreeBDS??? Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:25:27 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010320024837.A1109@student.uu.se> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Samba is ported to FreeBSD or the Linux version can run in FreeBSD??? Regards Julian Bolivar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 18:28:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lerami.lerctr.org (lerami.lerctr.org [207.158.72.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BF937B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:28:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: (from ler@localhost) by lerami.lerctr.org (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5/20010318/$Revision: 1.16 $) id f2L2SfAG016294; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:28:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ler) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:28:41 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman To: Julian Bolivar Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Samba en FreeBDS??? Message-ID: <20010320202841.A16281@lerami.lerctr.org> References: <20010320024837.A1109@student.uu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i In-Reply-To: ; from jbolivar@cantv.net on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 10:25:27PM -0400 X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Julian Bolivar [010320 20:26]: > Hello, Samba is ported to FreeBSD or the Linux version can run in FreeBSD??? cd /usr/ports/net/samba make make install as root. Also, cd /usr/ports make search key=samba LER > > Regards > > Julian Bolivar > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 18:29:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB60337B71E for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:29:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA00859; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:58:55 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:58:55 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Julian Bolivar Subject: RE: Samba en FreeBDS??? Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21-Mar-01 Julian Bolivar wrote: > Hello, Samba is ported to FreeBSD or the Linux version can run in FreeBSD??? Samba has been ported to FreeBSD. I suggest you look in the ports collection for it. (and loads of other software). /usr/ports/net/samba --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 18:37: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AD537B724 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:36:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from svzserv.kemerovo.su (kost.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.82]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA82960 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:36:52 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Message-ID: <3AB813C3.82638C88@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:36:51 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: more problems with 'make release' Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! My FreeBSD 3.5 has XFree86 3.3.6 installed as distribution. However, I've never run it here, it's installed only to minimize problems with ports that sometimes require X for libs and don't have option to build without X. I've manually installed /usr/ports/print/ghostscript6-nox11 but when I run 'make release' it wants to build /usr/ports/print/ghostscript6 which depends of X11.6, for some reason it says 'X11.6 - not found' and tries to build XFree86 from ports! That's definitly what shouldn't be done this way. If I allow it, it will install XFree86 from ports over existing installation, I suppose? It's very strange for me that it says 'gs - not found' when it IS in /usr/local/bin. Perhaps, it is running in chrooted environment? If so, I won't worry about X but - installation of X from ports is interactive. Is it supposed behavour? Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 20: 3:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from web13205.mail.yahoo.com (web13205.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0394A37B72B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:03:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lipshitz909@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010321004845.17826.qmail@web13205.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.168.57.140] by web13205.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:48:45 PST Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:48:45 -0800 (PST) From: Larry Librettez Subject: 4.3-BETA: cannot su root in console window in X To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After upgrading to 4.3-BETA, I now cannot do an su root login in a console window (xterm, rxvt) while in X. I did make buildworld, make installworld, built the new kernel and installed it, did mergemaster, and MAKEDEV on all my devices. I tried adding 'secure' to /etc/ttys after the ttyp* entries, even tried chmod 666 the /dev/ttyp* entries, and nothing works. I even re-made the /dev/ttyp* devices specifically. I cvsup'd on 3 different days from 3 different sites, and the problem still occurs. I verified my root password by typing it in the console (in X) to ensure the characters come out correctly, and they do. The strange thing is, I can su to root in a regular console out of X windows, but when I go into X, I cannot su to root. Is this a bug? Is this a DoS? Is this a kernel problem? Also, as an experiment I compiled and installed the older kernel (4.2-STABLE) but left the 4.3-BETA userland in place, and guess what . . . the problem went away. I was able to su to root in X, in both rxvt and xterm! So what's the problem here with 4.3-BETA? Can anyone help me? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 20:20:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-28.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BBB37B71D for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:20:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E10A66BDE; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:20:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:20:31 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Yoshihiro Koya Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010320202031.A29237@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010321050330K.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010321054522A.ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010321054522A.ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp>; from Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:45:22AM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:45:22AM +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > I can understand that CPUTYPE isn't used for building > the kernel on 4-stable. Thanks. >=20 > But, I have still a question. > The compilation of the kernel itself is free from the effects of=20 > CPUTYPE, but the kernel modules may be compiled with -march=3DSOMECPU > as I repoted in my previous message.=20 > It seems to cause some inconsistency in the future, I guess. > Is my thought wrong? Module builds use CFLAGS, not COPTFLAGS..that's just the way it is, I'm not sure why. Kris --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6uCwPWry0BWjoQKURAts9AJoCArgZBTbLiy4cgrcaElsRUJk5eACg71B0 Vewg4ELMb/uSTLnr0kBOKYg= =lLcC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 20:40:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB08E37B729 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:39:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 5828 invoked by uid 0); 21 Mar 2001 05:39:59 -0000 Received: from dsl1-160.dynacom.net (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 05:39:59 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB8309E.2DE53E0D@urx.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:39:58 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel O'Connor Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE2 + XFree4.. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 21-Mar-01 Kent Stewart wrote: > > > Well, startx won't work because the X binary is no longer setuid so you need to > > > install the xwrapper port (like it says when the XFree-4 port installs :) > > > > Nothing to do with that. I'm running as root and logged in as root on > > the console. It is dying with a message about a bad or missing > > library. > > Ahh.. > What message exactly? I didn't save them. They belonged to libmng-0.9.3 and I had libmng-1.0 installed at that point. Libmng was required by qt-2.2.4 and on. I ended up pkg_deleting and remaking everything from qt-2.2.4 up and the messages disappeared. It was on a kvm shared setup and I'm not sure which system couldn't do a startx. > > (PS logging in as root is bad :) Try testing the install of a port on your system as a user. I happen to like the dependancy view I get from pib. With a couple of exceptions I also don't use FreeBSD to browse the Internet. First, my server and gateway won't run x-windows. When you have a question on KDE, you almost have to use konqueror to visit kde.org for help. That is built into kde. You also get to visit kdevelop.org for the same reason when you run it. I happen to hate Netscape on FreeBSD but will use it over IE on a W2K machine. But there are some sites that I have to go to that require IE. Their information simply doesn't show up on Netscape. As long as I have both setups, I will use the one that irritates me the least. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 20:40:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.bmi.net (smtp.bmi.net [204.57.191.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BB937B71E for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:39:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net) Received: from webmail.bmi.net (dsl-154.bmi.net [207.173.60.230]) by smtp.bmi.net (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA12921 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:39:54 -0800 Message-ID: <3AB83093.73CB14A8@webmail.bmi.net> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:39:48 -0800 From: John Merryweather Cooper X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After installing XFree86-4.03 (XFree86-4.02 had worked just fine), I found myself with a mouse that would not function under X. The pointer would appear, but it would be pinned at the top-most scan line of the monitor--able to move laterally, but not vertically. The mouse in question is a Logitech MouseMan+ WheelMouse. Under 4.02, it had worked just fine. It was attached to a PS/2 mouse port. It was setup in sysinstall for "Auto" and PS/2 port with no other switches. I was curious what moused thought of the mouse. When I ran moused -p /dev/sysmouse -i all, I was unpleasantly surprised to see it identified as: /dev/sysmouse sysmouse sysmouse generic I switched over to connecting to COM2 (/dev/cuaa1), setup the mouse in sysinstall to "Auto" and /dev/cuaa1. And rebooted. Running moused -p /dev/cuaa1 -i all, I now get: /dev/cuaa1 serial intellimouse MouseMan+ I am now able to operate my mouse in X by adjusting the XF86Config file to reflect intellimouse protocol and /dev/cuaa1 for port. But I didn't need to do this before (it was set to sysmouse and /dev/sysmouse previously). Seems like something is broken. jmc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 20:52:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gaiberg.wi.mit.edu (gaiberg.wi.mit.edu [18.157.0.217]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7A237B71C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:52:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nam@wi.mit.edu) Received: from [18.157.3.59] (lodish33.wi.mit.edu [18.157.3.59]) by gaiberg.wi.mit.edu (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f2L4gxu09515 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:42:59 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: nam@gaiberg.wi.mit.edu (Unverified) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:50:28 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Hyung-song Nam Subject: 4.3BETA, sound module problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi all, I recently "cvsup'd (Mar 17-18) and made world" 4.3BETA. While I was using 4.2-STABLE, I used to compile my sound card (AWE64Gold) into the kernel. As I had only rarely accessed the sound card from this machine, I decided to give the modules a try. Bottom line is, it doesn't work. What I did, and the error messages I get follow: -Remove pcm and sbc from /sys/i386/conf/MYKERNEL -Compile new kernel and modules. Completes without any major errors. -Load sound modules during bootup with the following statements in /boot/loader.conf: snd_pcm_load="YES" snd_sbc_load="YES" -Reboot -The modules seem to load OK. Here's an excerpt from 'dmesg': ... Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc035a000. Preloaded elf module "vinum.ko" at 0xc035a09c. Preloaded elf module "snd_pcm.ko" at 0xc035a13c. Preloaded elf module "snd_sbc.ko" at 0xc035a1dc. ... -The card (PnP by the way) seems to initialize OK. Here's another excerpt from 'dmesg': ... sbc0: at port 0x220-0x22f,0x330-0x331,0x388-0x38b irq 5 drq 1,5 on isa0 ... -The modules are still there after bootup. kldstat shows this: Id Refs Address Size Name 1 4 0xc0100000 17d7f8 kernel 2 1 0xc027e000 c4ae0 vinum.ko 3 1 0xc0343000 116e8 snd_pcm.ko 4 1 0xc0355000 3d94 snd_sbc.ko -Just to make sure, I delete all audio devices and remake them like this, cd /etc; sh MAKEDEV snd0 -Now, the moment of truth. 'cat /dev/sndstat' shows this: cat: /dev/sndstat: Device not configured -aumix shows this: aumix: error opening mixer I can't figure it out. I've RTFM'd all I can find, man 4 pcm, sbc, etc etc etc. I find no useful info regarding using sound card drivers as modules. The drivers might work if I compile them, but that would defeat the purpose of having them as modules in the first place. Could anybody offer assistance? Thanks!!! -- Hyung-song Nam / nam@wi.mit.edu Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 20:53:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server1.wallnet.com (server1.wallnet.com [208.225.162.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C17337B71A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:53:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from timothyk@server1.wallnet.com) Received: from localhost (timothyk@localhost) by server1.wallnet.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id XAA09032 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:50:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:50:39 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Kellers Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Samba en FreeBDS??? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At one point last summer, I think, the ports collection had samba 2.0.6. Just for kicks, I downloaded the samba-latest.tgz from samba.org (samba 2.0.7), unpacked it, ran configure, make and make install --worked like a charm. Since then I've installed Samba 2.20a on a development machine (from the ports collection, though) and so far it's worked well, too. Tim On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 21-Mar-01 Julian Bolivar wrote: > > Hello, Samba is ported to FreeBSD or the Linux version can run in FreeBSD??? > > Samba has been ported to FreeBSD. I suggest you look in the ports collection for it. > (and loads of other software). > > /usr/ports/net/samba > > --- > Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer > for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au > "The nice thing about standards is that there > are so many of them to choose from." > -- Andrew Tanenbaum > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 21: 8:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E9937B71A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:08:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (216-118-21-147.pdq.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C0D11131A; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:08:32 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <02c801c0b1c4$f726dec0$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Tim Kellers" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Samba en FreeBDS??? Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:08:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG BTW, I think samba 2.2.0a3 is coming out soon and I'll hopefully have that port finished shortly after its released. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Kellers" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:50 PM Subject: RE: Samba en FreeBDS??? > > At one point last summer, I think, the ports collection had samba 2.0.6. > Just for kicks, I downloaded the samba-latest.tgz from samba.org (samba > 2.0.7), unpacked it, ran configure, make and make install --worked like a > charm. Since then I've installed Samba 2.20a on a development machine > (from the ports collection, though) and so far it's worked well, too. > > Tim > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > > > > On 21-Mar-01 Julian Bolivar wrote: > > > Hello, Samba is ported to FreeBSD or the Linux version can run in FreeBSD??? > > > > Samba has been ported to FreeBSD. I suggest you look in the ports collection for it. > > (and loads of other software). > > > > /usr/ports/net/samba > > > > --- > > Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer > > for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au > > "The nice thing about standards is that there > > are so many of them to choose from." > > -- Andrew Tanenbaum > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 21:19: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from laptop.os2warp.org (laptop.os2warp.org [209.136.194.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A8F37B719 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:19:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lambert@laptop.os2warp.org) Received: by laptop.os2warp.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5CC169C06; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:19:19 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:19:19 -0600 From: Scott Lambert To: FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.org Subject: microuptime() went backwards Message-ID: <20010320231919.A23244@laptop.os2warp.org> Reply-To: FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.org Mail-Followup-To: Scott Lambert , FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have just encounterred the microuptime() went backwards issue on my dual PPro 200 box. I have not changed the operating system at all. What I have done is change the video card (an ATI Expert 98, PCI), and compiled XFree86-4.0.3 from ports. I had not used X on this box before. I then installed X, ran xf86cfg, and exitted xf86cfg. At this point I had 5 microuptime errors all during the same second. I then tried to run X but it did not work. I had one microuptime error. I ran xf86cfg again and created 6 more microuptime errors. Again all errors happened in the same second. I am rebuilding this history from the log files. I did not pay a lot of attention to the error messages at the time because I knew I had seen the errors mentioned on the mailling lists and assumed I could fix it later. Two minutes later I have another 5 messages in one second. I think I editted the XF86Config file by hand in those two minutes then popped back into xf86cfg to check some things. After that it gets fuzzy. It seems that they only happenned while playing with xf86cfg or xvidtune. Most of the errors in my log showed up during the time that I think I was playing with xvidtune. During those times there were many more than 5 microuptime errors per second. Or maybe it just happens while actively doing something in X. I have spent the rest of the day building GNOME from ports. It was still building when I left work. I did use X after the errors end but I was simply runinig top in an xterm or installing xscreensaver in an xterm. (xscreensaver didn't want to work, I'm waiting for GNOME to use the GUI config rather than read the manual tonight. It was time for dinner anyway.) Now, I've searched the mailing lists and found two recommendations that don't seem to apply to me, and thoughts that microuptime errors may be related to certain Abit mobo's or even AMD processors. I'm posting this for data that it is not necessarily limited to the newer AMD related hardware and that APM may not be directly related. APM has never been compiled into the kernel on this machine. The sysctl variable is set to what was reccomended: $ sysctl kern.timecounter.method kern.timecounter.method: 0 Could the video card be busmastering too long and not allowing the kernel to get timer readings on time? ie. a bus contention issue? Thanks for listening, -- Scott Lambert lambert@os2warp.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 21:32:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7303137B722 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:32:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2L2wGO00829; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:58:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103210258.f2L2wGO00829@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: rand@meridian-enviro.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Mike Tancsa , bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:54:48 CST." <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 18:58:16 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Mike, thanks for all your help and the time you've invested in > this! What we can do to assist? Do you have any coding experience? I can't reproduce this here, but what I want to do is see what the command that's stuck on the busy queue looks like. If you can add another function like twe_printstate that invokes twe_print_request on each of the requests on the busy queue and let me know what they look like, that might give me some clues. (I'd send you diffs, but I'm snowed at work and quite ill just now 8(...) Regards, Mike -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 21:42:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from giroc.albury.net.au (giroc.albury.NET.AU [203.15.244.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6667B37B71D for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:42:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nicks@giroc.albury.net.au) Received: (from nicks@localhost) by giroc.albury.net.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2L5gQ052839; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:42:26 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:42:26 +1100 From: Nick Slager To: "Brett G. Lemoine" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack Message-ID: <20010321164225.A49175@albury.net> References: <200103201725.JAA04278@blah.incyte.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103201725.JAA04278@blah.incyte.com>; from bl@incyte.com on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 09:25:51AM -0800 X-Homer: Whoohooooooo! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Brett G. Lemoine (bl@incyte.com): > OK, I need help. I'm starting to suspect either FreeBSD just doesn't like > my motherboard (a Tyan S1837 Thunderbolt), or that I've got a flaky > on-board scsi controller. I've been getting the following errors > on both my internal disks (and ocasionally on my jaz drive as well): Have you double (and triple) checked your cabling and termination? Nick -- Nick Slager | Quidquid latine dictum nicks@albury.net | sit, altum viditur. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 21:53:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from laptop.os2warp.org (laptop.os2warp.org [209.136.194.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF7B37B71B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:53:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lambert@laptop.os2warp.org) Received: by laptop.os2warp.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83C429C06; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:54:11 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:54:11 -0600 From: Scott Lambert To: FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010320235411.B23244@laptop.os2warp.org> Reply-To: Scott Lambert Mail-Followup-To: Scott Lambert , FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.org References: <20010319214915.A33199@cec.wustl.edu> <20010319230902.A90772@cec.wustl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319230902.A90772@cec.wustl.edu>; from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:09:02PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:09:02PM -0600, Andrew Hesford wrote: > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:09:02 -0600 > From: Andrew Hesford > To: Matt Martini > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA > > This is not what I pointed out. > > -CURRENT is what you get for the bleeding edge. > > -STABLE is what you get for stable code. > > The changes in -STABLE are minor and well-tested; in contrast, there is > no guarantee that -CURRENT will even build on a given day. > > The big source of confusion on this list is the distinction between > BETA, STABLE, RC and RELEASE. As long as people understand that all are > the same code branch, there should be no trouble. Or to put it another way, -RELEASE is what Sun will sell you as Solaris x.x, IBM will sell you as OS/2 x, Microsoft will sell you as (insert screwed up nameing scheme here). -STABLE is Solaris x.x with the cumulative patchset installed, OS/2 with the latest fixpack installed, or Microsoft's next earth shatterringly original product that you get to pay for. Don't let the fact that we get the source code confuse you. How many people run the vendor supplied rev of any OS without downloading patchsets, fixpacks (OS/2), or service packs (Microsoft)? The same ones who only run -RELEASE on FreeBSD. I'm running OS/2 Warp 4 with Fixpack 14 installed. Which now tells me it is OS/2 Warp 4.5. Some fixpacks are good, others really *suck*, especially now that the user community has convinced IBM to release the fixpacks without worrying so much about quality control. On average FreeBSD-STABLE is definitely no less stable than your average patchset, fixpack, or service pack you get from other vendors. -CURRENT is the vendors next rev. FreeBSD stable is about as stable as other versions next major rev. You just can't get your hands on IBM's next version of OS/2 unless you are one of the OS/2 developers. You can't get Microsoft's next rev of Windows unless... well it doesn't really apply to Microsoft does it? -- Reading my message, I *like* that explanation (other than the -CURRENT paragraph), anybody else? Scott Lambert lambert@os2warp.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 22:42:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from floater.nas.nasa.gov (floater.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD4837B71E for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:42:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from floater.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:yKAqZmaHHwa1WD9ryGbyZF6HiYNOJUsD@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by floater.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2L6g4u00571; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:42:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Message-Id: <200103210642.f2L6g4u00571@floater.nas.nasa.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: tweten@nas.nasa.gov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: tweten@nas.nasa.gov Subject: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails From: Dave Tweten Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:42:02 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG For the past couple of weeks, I've been unable to cvsup STABLE and buildworld successfully on my Versa 6050MX laptop. I've been using FreeBSD 4.3-BETA (FLOATER) #2: Tue Mar 6 22:17:30 PST 2001 as a build platform. Any clues as to what might be happening would be appreciated. Last night, I got through >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4: populating /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include >>> stage 4: building libraries and died on cc -O -pipe -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libmenu/../libncurses -I/usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurses/menu -I/usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../ contrib/ncurses/include -Wall -DNDEBUG -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurs es/menu/m_post.c -o m_post.o /usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurses/menu/m_post.c: In function `_nc_Draw_Menu': /usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurses/menu/m_post.c:218: syntax error before character 05 [lots of warnings and syntax errors deleted for the sake of e-mail bandwidth] /usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurses/menu/m_post.c:320: warning: assignment of read-only member `sub' /usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurses/menu/m_post.c:324: warning: assignment of read-only member `win' /usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurses/menu/m_post.c:326: warning: assignment of read-only member `status' /usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurses/menu/m_post.c:328: warning: `return' with a value, in function returning void /usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurses/menu/m_post.c:332: syntax error at end of input *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/libmenu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. -- M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377 We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 23:12:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from segfault.kiev.ua (segfault.kiev.ua [193.193.193.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2112637B71F; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:12:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by segfault.kiev.ua (8) with UUCP id JEN49087; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:11:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua) Received: (from netch@localhost) by iv.nn.kiev.ua (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2L7Ai809439; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:10:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from netch) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:10:44 +0200 From: Valentin Nechayev To: Nick Slager Cc: "Brett G. Lemoine" , stable@freebsd.org, gibbs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack Message-ID: <20010321091044.A307@iv.nn.kiev.ua> References: <200103201725.JAA04278@blah.incyte.com> <20010321164225.A49175@albury.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010321164225.A49175@albury.net>; from nicks@albury.net on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:43:28AM +0000 X-42: On Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:43:28, nicks (Nick Slager) wrote about "Re: ahc - Invalidating pack": > > OK, I need help. I'm starting to suspect either FreeBSD just doesn't like > > my motherboard (a Tyan S1837 Thunderbolt), or that I've got a flaky > > on-board scsi controller. I've been getting the following errors > > on both my internal disks (and ocasionally on my jaz drive as well): > Have you double (and triple) checked your cabling and termination? We have the same problem after `make world' yesterday (previous 4.2-STABLE version was of December 2000). I can only try to blame changes of aic7xxx driver made by gibbs@ at Mar 12... (But his recent changes at Mar 19, 20 was not yet applied yet to this host.) All cabling and termination is checked double and triple;) Example of messages: Mar 21 08:46:55 burka /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:10:0): SCB 0x36 - timed out in Data-out phase, SEQADDR == 0x177 Mar 21 08:46:56 burka /kernel: STACK == 0x180, 0x189, 0xe, 0xe Mar 21 08:46:56 burka /kernel: SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 Mar 21 08:46:56 burka /kernel: ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x177 Mar 21 08:46:56 burka /kernel: SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0x2, SSTAT0 0x25 Mar 21 08:46:56 burka /kernel: SCB count = 110 Mar 21 08:46:56 burka /kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 69 Mar 21 08:46:56 burka /kernel: Card NEXTQSCB = 52 Mar 21 08:46:56 burka /kernel: QINFIFO entries: 52 104 96 17 97 68 1 0 85 98 89 86 88 99 56 13 53 28 37 80 7 94 5 6 43 95 39 40 57 71 30 36 81 51 72 93 3 109 87 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: Waiting Queue entries: Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: Disconnected Queue entries: 5:66 0:67 3:33 8:21 12:54 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: QOUTFIFO entries: Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: Sequencer Free SCB List: 13 7 9 10 6 14 4 15 11 1 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: Pending list: 87 109 3 93 72 51 81 36 30 71 57 40 39 95 43 6 5 94 7 80 37 28 53 13 56 99 88 86 89 98 85 0 1 68 97 17 96 104 52 66 67 33 21 54 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: Kernel Free SCB list: 18 83 82 59 27 91 84 12 42 107 14 108 70 9 46 65 50 47 41 55 20 92 11 23 4 38 22 32 24 58 90 8 29 31 44 19 26 49 16 45 105 106 15 10 35 2 48 34 25 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 103 102 101 100 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: sg[0] - Addr 0x57fd000 : Length 4096 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: sg[1] - Addr 0x5b7e000 : Length 4096 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:10:0): Queuing a BDR SCB Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:10:0): SCB 0x36 - timed out in Data-out phase, SEQADDR == 0x177 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: STACK == 0x180, 0x189, 0xe, 0xe Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x177 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0x2, SSTAT0 0x25 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: SCB count = 110 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 0 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: Card NEXTQSCB = 69 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: QINFIFO entries: 69 85 98 89 86 88 99 56 13 53 28 37 80 7 94 5 6 43 95 39 40 57 71 30 36 81 51 72 93 3 109 87 54 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: Waiting Queue entries: Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: Disconnected Queue entries: 5:66 0:67 3:33 8:21 Mar 21 08:46:57 burka /kernel: QOUTFIFO entries: Mar 21 08:46:58 burka /kernel: Sequencer Free SCB List: 12 13 7 9 10 6 14 4 15 11 1 Mar 21 08:46:58 burka /kernel: Pending list: 87 109 3 93 72 51 81 36 30 71 57 40 39 95 43 6 5 94 7 80 37 28 53 13 56 99 88 86 89 98 85 69 66 67 33 21 54 Mar 21 08:46:58 burka /kernel: Kernel Free SCB list: 1 68 97 17 96 104 52 18 83 82 59 27 91 84 12 42 107 14 108 70 9 46 65 50 47 41 55 20 92 11 23 4 38 22 32 24 58 90 8 29 31 44 19 26 49 16 45 105 106 15 10 35 2 48 34 25 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 103 102 101 100 Mar 21 08:46:58 burka /kernel: sg[0] - Addr 0x57fd000 : Length 4096 Mar 21 08:46:58 burka /kernel: sg[1] - Addr 0x5b7e000 : Length 4096 Mar 21 08:46:58 burka /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:10:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34b Mar 21 08:46:58 burka /kernel: ahc0: Issued Channel A Bus Reset. 37 SCBs aborted None disk problems with the particular disks occured earlier. Startup messages of this host with this kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #1: Tue Mar 20 15:21:07 EET 2001 root@burka.carrier.kiev.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/burka Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (333.27-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x651 Stepping = 1 Features=0x183fbff real memory = 268435456 (262144K bytes) avail memory = 258269184 (252216K bytes) Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc029e000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard IOAPIC #0 intpin 18 -> irq 2 IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 9 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 ahc0: port 0xf800-0xf8ff mem 0xfedff000-0xfedfffff irq 2 at device 11.0 on pci0 ahc0: Using left over BIOS settings aic7880: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs fxp0: port 0xfce0-0xfcff mem 0xfeb00000-0xfebfffff,0xfedfe000-0xfedfefff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:82:28:c5 pci0: at 18.0 isab0: at device 20.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at 20.1 pci0: at 20.2 Timecounter "PIIX" frequency 3579545 Hz chip1: port 0x2180-0x218f at device 20.3 on pci0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (probe6:ahc0:0:6:0): SCB 0x0 - timed out in Data-out phase, SEQADDR == 0x177 STACK == 0x180, 0x189, 0x0, 0xe SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x177 SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0x2, SSTAT0 0x5 SCB count = 20 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 3 Card NEXTQSCB = 14 QINFIFO entries: 14 0 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Pending list: 14 0 Kernel Free SCB list: 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 12 11 10 Untagged Q(6): 0 Untagged Q(10): 14 sg[0] - Addr 0x5040 : Length 32 (probe6:ahc0:0:6:0): SCB 0: Immediate reset. Flags = 0x6048 (probe6:ahc0:0:6:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34b ahc0: Issued Channel A Bus Reset. 2 SCBs aborted Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 10 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 17501MB (35843670 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 17501C) da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 8715MB (17850000 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8715C) Should we try most fresh sources or fall back to ~2001.03.10? /netch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 23:42:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D46B37B71C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:42:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2L7fRO30139; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:41:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:41:27 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" Cc: , , Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA In-Reply-To: <20010320213334.56106fcd.steveo@eircom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:53:50 -0800 > Kent Stewart wrote: > KS> > - -RELEASE branch doesn't change. To my mind this is all backwards. > KS> Not in my mind. The -release branch always has something wrong with it > > But -release is *not* a branch, it is a point. It cannot change, it > exists on vast numbers of CDs, the release is what got burned on all those > CDs. Not being someone with any authority... I've heard rumblings to the effect that in the future, -release *will* be a branch and major things (ie security fixes) will be back ported to it. But the only people that would be able to confirm this would be the security officer (Kris I believe) and the release officer (Jordan). -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 23:55: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.185.254.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B46637B71B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:54:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinesh@worldcare.com.my) Received: (qmail 14630 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 07:54:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.190.165.207) by ns2.alphaque.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 07:54:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (jk2gky@localhost.alphaque.com [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2L7l0x01603 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:47:00 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@worldcare.com.my) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:47:00 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: booting diskless on 4.3 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hey, are there any howtos or documents on configuring fbsd 4.3 as a boot server thru dhcp and pxe and having another box boot diskless off this one ? the handbook and faq entries seem rather dated here. --dinesh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 23:55:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE39137B71E for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:55:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from svzserv.kemerovo.su (kost.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.82]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA55007 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:55:01 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Message-ID: <3AB85E53.CE88E841@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:54:59 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: 'make release' breaks vn0 References: <3AB813C3.82638C88@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! I keep vn0 used for mounting an ISO image (it's contents is mounted on /var/ftp/pub/... for downloads) and had experience with PicoBSD which detects next free vn? number so did not bother to check 'make release'. And it finished it's work. After that I found that it destroyed my vn0 configuration. I'm forced to use 'umount -f' to free mount point than do vnconfig and mount to restore running system. Finally I found that this can be avoided using make release VNDEVICE=vn1 ... This should be documented (f.e. in the FAQ when 'make release is explained) or, better, changed to detect free vn node. Now, is built release correct? Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 0:13:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from scully.zoominternet.net (scully.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B29A137B71C for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:13:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmmiller@cvzoom.net) Received: (qmail 23159 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 08:06:46 -0000 Received: from acs-24-154-35-126.zoominternet.net (HELO cvzoom.net) (24.154.35.126) by scully.zoominternet.net with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 08:06:46 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB8629F.9C7CE2A0@cvzoom.net> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 03:13:19 -0500 From: Donn Miller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hyung-song Nam Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3BETA, sound module problems References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hyung-song Nam wrote: . > sbc0: at port > 0x220-0x22f,0x330-0x331,0x388-0x38b irq 5 > drq 1,5 on isa0 > ... > > -The modules are still there after bootup. kldstat shows this: > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 4 0xc0100000 17d7f8 kernel > 2 1 0xc027e000 c4ae0 vinum.ko > 3 1 0xc0343000 116e8 snd_pcm.ko > 4 1 0xc0355000 3d94 snd_sbc.ko See, I had the same problem. The problem is that pcm0 is not being reported in the kernel log messages as being detected, but sbc0 is. Had pcm0 been detected properly, it would have shown up in the kernel log messages. So, snd_pcm is loading, but not activating the pcm device. Statically compiling pcm into my kernel works OK, though. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 1:24:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.wipol.uni-bonn.de (data.wipol.uni-bonn.de [131.220.47.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669E237B71F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:24:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from noel@koethe.net) Received: by mail.wipol.uni-bonn.de (Postfix, from userid 506) id E29BF3D13; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:24:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wipol.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7743B6DF; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:24:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:24:53 +0100 (CET) From: Noel Koethe X-Sender: noel@data.wipol.uni-bonn.de To: Thomas Moestl Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dmesg output In-Reply-To: <20010320181117.A2347@crow.dom2ip.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Thomas Moestl wrote: Hello Thomas, > > Why it is here normal on one machine and cutted on the other? > > And why does it work before ( I'm sure in December it doesn't work like > > now )? > > OK, I'll go into details a little more. Not too long ago, a patch was > MFCed that allows logging console output. To allow this, this ouput is > written into the kernel message buffer, where it can be picked up by > syslog using the /dev/klog interface. Normal kernel output is written > to the message buffer as is, while console output is prefixed with a > string in the form "", where category is a number (118 in > this case, LOG_CONSOLE|LOG_INFO). dmesg will ignore messages that > start with such a string indicating that the message didn't come from > the kernel unless it is invoked with the -a option. If syslogd is > configured to echo some messages to the console, those messages will > be appended to the kernel message buffer, and if this happens too > often, this will overwrite all the kernel messages. A common situation > is that a lot of kernel messages are generated that fill up the message > buffer, syslog snarfs those a little later, writes them to the console > and thus overwrites the original kernel messages in turn. dmesg > will show nothing in this case, or, more often, a line that came from > the console, but of which the first character(s) were overwritten by a > new message (they don't start with a "" magic string then, and > dmesg will print them). > So, dmesg will work as expected on machines that didn't generate > enough messages yet, or on systems from before the MFC. Thanks for this long explanation. Maybe the daily "security check output" will be correct: host.domain.de kernel log messages: > ia tun0 Again. Thanks for your answers. -- Noch einen schoenen Tag Noel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 1:47:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailgate3.cinetic.de (mailgate3.cinetic.de [212.227.116.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720BD37B73C for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:47:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tmseck@web.de) Received: from cinetic.de (popeye.cinetic.de [194.122.194.100]) by mailgate3.cinetic.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP id f2L9lXN07872 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:47:33 +0100 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:47:33 +0100 Message-Id: <200103210947.f2L9lXN07872@mailgate3.cinetic.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ From: "Thomas Seck" To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: CTM down since Mar 13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, it seems that CTM is down since Mar 13. Does anyone know why=3F --=20 Regards, Thomas Seck Please excuse the freemail ad below. =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Alles unter einem Dach: Informationen, Fun, E-Mails. Bei WEB.DE: http://we= b.de Die gro=DFe Welt der Kommunikation: E-Mail, Fax, SMS, WAP: http://freemail.w= eb.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 2: 4:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f3.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C9437B744; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 02:04:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jefffbsd@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 02:03:11 -0800 Received: from 161.184.39.167 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:03:11 GMT X-Originating-IP: [161.184.39.167] From: "Jeffrey Sewell" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Routing/2 Nic Help-please and thanks Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:03:11 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Mar 2001 10:03:11.0998 (UTC) FILETIME=[235CA1E0:01C0B1EE] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My issue; have 2 NICs set with 'External' IPs on different wires(diff hubs), and only one responds to external pings (xl0). xl0 = 161.184.39.164 (works) xl1 = 24.68.217.232 (doesn't respond) I setup DHCP for both interfaces and ifconfig shows that they both get their ips. xl0 listens properly, while xl1 won't respond to pings and what not. I figure it's because xl1 receives the ping and xl0 replies because of the routes setup. However I'm not very good at routes, so I need help :) Can someone please advise how to fix this solution? I provided my information: * netstat -rn ********************************************************* Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 161.184.32.1 UGSc 2 9 xl0 24.68.216/22 link#2 UC 0 0 xl1 => 24.68.217.232 0:1:2:ec:27:ff UHLW 0 4 lo0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 161.184.32/21 link#1 UC 0 0 xl0 => 161.184.32.1 0:d0:63:64:f4:0 UHLW 2 0 xl0 1200 * end of netstat -rn ************************************************** * ifconfig -a ********************************************************* xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::250:daff:fe6c:b738%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 161.184.39.164 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 161.184.39.255 ether 00:50:da:6c:b7:38 media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UT P 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::201:2ff:feec:27ff%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 24.68.217.232 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 24.68.219.255 ether 00:01:02:ec:27:ff media: autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UT P 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX * end of ifconfig -a **************************************************** * arp -an *************************************************************** ? (24.68.217.232) at 0:1:2:ec:27:ff permanent [ethernet] ? (161.184.32.1) at 0:d0:63:64:f4:0 [ethernet] * end of arp -an ******************************************************** _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 2:42:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE6937B719 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 02:42:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roman@harmonic.co.il) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA02923; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:35:45 +0300 To: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ARCH in /etc/make.conf Message-ID: <985170945.3ab8840168528@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:35:45 +0300 (IDT) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Roman Shterenzon , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010319020716.B4427@xor.obsecurity.org> <985128401.3ab7ddd1dff3c@webmail.harmonic.co.il> <20010320163708.B26858@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010320163708.B26858@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Kris Kennaway : > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 01:46:41AM +0300, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > Quoting Kris Kennaway : > > > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 12:44:38PM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've noticed that for K6-2 -march=k6 is implied. > > > > Browsing through gcc code teaches me that ``k6 - doesn't have > > > pipelines'' > > > > which is wrong for sure for K6-2. That may explain why > -march=pentium > > > > binaries (played with graphics/xine port) run faster than > -march=k6. > > > > Perhaps it's wiser to set -march=pentium for K6-2 (of course, with > > > 3DNOW - > > > > I haven't seen yet what variables are set for benefit of ports > like > > > mpg123) > > > > > > Can you produce benchmarks showing that this is the right thing to > do? > > > > > > Kris > > > > > If you tell me how, I'd be glad to help. > > I played with xine - ran each one many times (in order to eliminate as > much as > > possible the cache, tlb and os cache effects) and watched the dropped > frames > > and other information. This is far from being "good benchmark". > > Is there're anything related in ports/benchmarks, some new incarnation > of > > wetstone/dhrystone or something? > > Timing the execution of computationally-intensive, repeatable tasks is > the way to go here. Remember to recompile everything (libraries and > binaries) with the two sets of optimizations so you're comparing > things properly, and to run the benchmark several times consecutively > on an otherwise quiet system and average the results, discarding the > first iteration as it may be affected by CPU or OS-level caching of > instructions/data. > > Things like gzip of a large file, kernel/world buildstones (assuming > they're not I/O-dominated), and other CPU-bound tasks should be > affected by the different processor optimizations. > > Kris > gzip or cc will only tell about integer performance. I'm looking for more generic benchmark, that will measure integer, fp, predicted and unpredicted branches. For now, I'll do the following: use gzip and/or bzip2 over a large text and binary files ~10 times use lame (mp3 encoder) on some .wav files use mpg123 with decompression to disk on some .mp3 files. This is the best thing I can think of right now. I'll use "time" command. Suggestions? --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 3:52:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-63.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0682637B732 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 03:52:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F0B5666C3B; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 03:50:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 03:50:24 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dave Tweten Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails Message-ID: <20010321035024.A1159@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200103210642.f2L6g4u00571@floater.nas.nasa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103210642.f2L6g4u00571@floater.nas.nasa.gov>; from tweten@nas.nasa.gov on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 10:42:02PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 10:42:02PM -0800, Dave Tweten wrote: > /usr/src/lib/libmenu/../../contrib/ncurses/menu/m_post.c:218: syntax erro= r=20 > before character 05 >=20 > [lots of warnings and syntax errors deleted for the sake of e-mail bandwi= dth] Sounds like your source code got corrupted somehow. Re-cvsup, and if that fails try removing the offending file, re-cvsup and try again. Kris --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6uJWAWry0BWjoQKURAn7vAKDkJvSLyU6+MPvA/6IOHme0FCegAgCg7Mbt +jk590Rl+la6fbq4qQYFF0E= =Pan0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 5: 9:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB9037B734 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:09:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26865A86A; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:08:36 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244795479; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:08:36 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:08:36 +1000 (EST) From: To: Andrew Tulloch Cc: , Subject: Re: /usr/ports/apache13 & sig11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andrew Tulloch wrote: > I built apache from the ports updated this morning using cvsup and for > some reason everytime I run `apachectl start` httpd Sig 11 core dumps. The What does hostname produce? apache13 seems to require hostname to return a FQHN. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 5:24:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail1.bna.bellsouth.net (mail1.bna.bellsouth.net [205.152.150.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4568037B742 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:24:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trawickj@bellsouth.net) Received: from adsl-77-241-65.rdu.bellsouth.net (adsl-77-241-65.rdu.bellsouth.net [216.77.241.65]) by mail1.bna.bellsouth.net (3.3.5alt/0.75.2) with ESMTP id IAA14405; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:22:50 -0500 (EST) Received: (from trawick@localhost) by adsl-77-241-65.rdu.bellsouth.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id IAA10677; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:20:17 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: adsl-77-241-65.rdu.bellsouth.net: trawick set sender to trawickj@bellsouth.net using -f To: new-httpd@apache.org Cc: Hroi Sigurdsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/ports/apache13 & sig11 References: From: Jeff Trawick Date: 21 Mar 2001 08:20:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 87 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There is a bug in Apache 1.3.19 which can cause a segfault when servername isn't coded and the local host can't be looked up for some reason. It is fixed in CVS, ready for 1.3.20. I certainly hope that fix is all you need. The patch is shown later on in the note. Andrew Tulloch writes: > One ServerName directive later and it works :) > > Thanks! > > Andrew > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Hroi Sigurdsson wrote: > > > CC'ed to new-httpd@apache.org. More below. > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:53:08PM +0000, Andrew Tulloch wrote: > > > > > I built apache from the ports updated this morning using cvsup and for > > > some reason everytime I run `apachectl start` httpd Sig 11 core dumps. The > > > machine itself seems to be fine apart from this having postfix/cyrus-imapd > > > running fine for a few days since I built the machine. Its also hosted a > > > couple of buildworlds so I don't think the ram is at fault, although I > > > also tried swapping it out to be sure. > > > > > > a quick gdb /usr/local/sbin/httpd httpd.core and bt gave > > > (gdb) bt > > > #0 0x8064287 in ap_get_local_host () > > > #1 0x80616c0 in ap_fini_vhost_config () > > > #2 0x80539a3 in ap_read_config () > > > #3 0x805b408 in main () > > > #4 0x804ea11 in _start () > > > > > > and seems to be the same for every dump. > > > dmesg below.. > > > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated! :) > > > > This is most likely not a bug in FreeBSD. I've seen the exact same thing on > > Linux, Apache 1.3.19: definitely Apache 1.3.19 :( > > The line in question is > > if (gethostname(str, sizeof(str) - 1) != 0) { I hope not... The known fix is =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/main/util.c,v retrieving revision 1.194 retrieving revision 1.195 diff -u -r1.194 -r1.195 --- apache-1.3/src/main/util.c 2001/02/01 10:06:37 1.194 +++ apache-1.3/src/main/util.c 2001/03/13 10:22:21 1.195 @@ -2040,7 +2040,6 @@ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_WARNING, NULL, "%s: gethostname() failed to determine ServerName\n", ap_server_argv0); - server_hostname = ap_pstrdup(a, "127.0.0.1"); } else { @@ -2048,7 +2047,7 @@ if ((!(p = gethostbyname(str))) || (!(server_hostname = find_fqdn(a, p)))) { /* Recovery - return the default servername by IP: */ - if (p->h_addr_list[0]) { + if (p && p->h_addr_list[0]) { ap_snprintf(str, sizeof(str), "%pA", p->h_addr_list[0]); server_hostname = ap_pstrdup(a, str); /* We will drop through to report the IP-named server */ > > A work-around is setting the ServerName directive in httpd.conf so that > > ap_get_local_host() doesn't get called. yep -- Jeff Trawick | trawickj@bellsouth.net | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 5:42:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C616137B719; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:42:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E1EDA86A; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:40:19 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E435479; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:40:19 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:40:19 +1000 (EST) From: To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Mike Pritchard , Larry Rosenman , , Subject: Re: cputype=486 In-Reply-To: <20010312003516.A51209@mollari.cthul.hu> Message-ID: X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well I'm sure the problem has been sorted by now but make world has finished on my 486 and everything is fine...strip works as expected. Thanks, Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 5:45:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50F6137B720 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:45:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 34960 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 13:43:15 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 13:43:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 2164 invoked by uid 145); 21 Mar 2001 13:43:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 13:43:15 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:43:15 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Matt Dillon Cc: Alfred Perlstein , Gordon Tetlow , Rich Morin , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: <200103201911.f2KJBAR96066@earth.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ok - to sum up a bit.. - for a good LAN, use UDP - use v3 (this is what I thought) - use standard data sizes but still... Our network connection between client and server is going directly over a BaySwitch 450 24T, all interfaces set to 100baseTX, half-duplex. So the LAN is good. We run 4 nfsd's and 4 nfsiods on each machine. I did the mount as 'mount_nfs ....' Even so 'mount' does'nt show, I suppose I made a v3 mount (from the source code of mount_nfs). BTW, is there any way to figure that out? If I do a 'dd if=/dev/zero of=zero2 bs=16k count=64x400' I get 419430400 bytes transferred in 147.402451 secs (2845478 bytes/sec) (varying from 2.5 to 2.8 Mb/s) maybe the box was loaded yesterday at my first try... Locally the server does 10Mb/s write and 33Mb/s read. So isn't 2.8 Mb/s a bit slow, still? Do you know what actually determines the writing speed in a case like our's? Network or disk? BTW, what is that '-q' switch to mount_nfs actually doing? -Jan -- Physikalisches Institut der Universitaet Bonn Nussallee 12 D-53115 Bonn GERMANY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 5:48:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lerami.lerctr.org (lerami.lerctr.org [207.158.72.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FC637B71A; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:48:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: (from ler@localhost) by lerami.lerctr.org (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5/20010318/$Revision: 1.16 $) id f2LDj4Vc023306; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:45:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ler) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:45:04 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman To: andrew@ugh.net.au Cc: Kris Kennaway , Mike Pritchard , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cputype=486 Message-ID: <20010321074504.A23234@lerami.lerctr.org> References: <20010312003516.A51209@mollari.cthul.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i In-Reply-To: ; from andrew@ugh.net.au on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:40:19PM +1000 X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * andrew@ugh.net.au [010321 07:42]: > > > Well I'm sure the problem has been sorted by now but make world has > finished on my 486 and everything is fine...strip works as expected. > Yes, the problem was the fact that the host system was running CPUTYPE=p3 code. Some places use the HOST system library. This will be true in 4.3-RELEASE, and a warning is supposed to be present (I haven't CVSUP'd in a while). LER > Thanks, > > Andrew > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 5:51:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from siafu.iconnect.co.ke (upagraha.iconnect.co.ke [209.198.248.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA41F37B719 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:51:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wash@poeza.iconnect.co.ke) Received: from [212.22.161.3] (helo=ns2.iconnect.co.ke) by siafu.iconnect.co.ke with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14fiyO-0004JX-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:48:24 +0300 Received: from amavis by ns2.iconnect.co.ke with scanned-ok (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14fizq-000M93-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:49:54 +0300 Received: from host-64-110-74-50.interpacket.net ([64.110.74.50] helo=poeza.iconnect.co.ke) by ns2.iconnect.co.ke with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14fizn-000M4k-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:49:52 +0300 Received: from wash by poeza.iconnect.co.ke with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14fj1l-000NmO-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:51:53 +0300 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:51:53 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: FBSD-STABLE Subject: Buildworld Fails Message-ID: <20010321165153.A91330@poeza.iconnect.co.ke> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , FBSD-STABLE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD poeza.iconnect.co.ke 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Location: Mombasa, KE, East Africa Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have failure at the point below after a cvsup today: cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_IDEA -DL_ENDIAN - DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ include -c /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/ssl_ rsa.c -o ssl_rsa.po cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_IDEA -DL_ENDIAN - DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ include -c /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/ssl_ sess.c -o ssl_sess.po cc: Internal compiler error: program as got fatal signal 11 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Has it been seen by anyone??? Or even discussed in the list, witha remedy? -Wash -- Odhiambo Washington Inter-Connect Ltd., wash@iconnect.co.ke 5th Flr Furaha Plaza Tel: 254 11 222604 Nkrumah Rd., Fax: 254 11 222636 PO Box 83613 MOMBASA, KE. He that is giddy thinks the world turns round. -William Shakespeare, "The= =20 Taming of the Shrew"=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 5:52: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ady.warpnet.ro (ady.warpnet.ro [194.102.224.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAEB37B719; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:51:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Received: from localhost (ady@localhost) by ady.warpnet.ro (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA79098; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:57:59 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:57:59 +0200 (EET) From: Adrian Penisoara To: Bosko Milekic Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel crush due to frag attack In-Reply-To: <00d001c09f8d$8ee4d360$becbca18@jehovah> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Coming back to you with a reply I should have given earlier. See below. In the mean time I have applied one of Ruslan Emirov's patches and had no panics ever since. Clearly not a hardware issue but faulty code :) ... I also see that there has been applied a patch (by jkh) in the CVS tree for this matter, I hope it solves the problem, I haven't checked yet. On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > Adrian Penisoara wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As we are facing a heavy fragments attack (40-60byte packets in a > > ~ 1000 pkts/sec flow) I see some sporadic panics. Kernel/world is > > 4.2-STABLE as of 18 Jan 2001 -- it's a production machine and I > hadn't yet > > the chance for another update; if it's been fixed in the mean time I > would > > be glad to hear it... > > > > I have attached a gdb trace and a snip of a tcpdump log. When I > rebuilt > > the kernel with debug options it seemed to crush less often. I > remember > > that at the time of this panic I had an ipfw rule to deny IP > fragments. > > This is one of those "odd" faults I've seen in -STABLE sometimes. > Thanks to good debugging information you've provided, to be noted: > > #16 0xc014de98 in m_copym (m=0xc07e7c00, off0=0, len=40, wait=1) > at ../../kern/uipc_mbuf.c:621 > 621 n->m_pkthdr.len -= off0; > (kgdb) list > 616 if (n == 0) > 617 goto nospace; > 618 if (copyhdr) { > 619 M_COPY_PKTHDR(n, m); > 620 if (len == M_COPYALL) > 621 n->m_pkthdr.len -= off0; <-- fault happens here (XXX) > 622 else > 623 n->m_pkthdr.len = len; > 624 copyhdr = 0; > 625 } > (kgdb) print n > $1 = (struct mbuf *) 0x661c20 > (kgdb) print *n > cannot read proc at 0 > (kgdb) print m > $2 = (struct mbuf *) 0xc07e7c00 > > Where the fault happens (XXX), the possible problem is that the mbuf > pointer n is bad, and as printed from the debugger, it does appear to > be bad. However, there are two things to note: > > 1. the fault virtual address displayed in the trap message: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x89c0c800 > [...] > > is different from the one printed in your analysis (even though > 0x89c0c800 seems bogus as well, although it is at a correct boundry). > > 2. Nothing bad happens in M_COPY_PKTHDR() which dereferences an > equivalent pointer. > > Something seriously evil is happening here and, unfortunately, I have > no idea what. > > Does this only happen on this one machine? Or is it reproducable on > several different machines? I used to stress test -STABLE for mbuf > starvation and never stumbled upon one of these `spontaneous pointer > deaths' myself. Although I have seen other weird problems reported by > other people, but only in RELENG_3. I see this exhibited so far only on our server (other machines don't get the fragments as they are dropped on entry in our gateway). > > If you cannot reproduce it on any other machines, I would start > looking at possibly bad hardware... unless someone else sees something > I'm not. As I said, ever since I applied Ruslan Emirov's patch the panics didn't exhibit anymore. RGDS, Ady (@warpnet.ro) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 6:14:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gactr.uga.edu (mail.gactr.uga.edu [128.192.37.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4FE137B732 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:14:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Robin_Blanchard@gactr.uga.edu) Received: (qmail 20904 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 14:14:32 -0000 Received: from qat.noc.nat (HELO gactr.uga.edu) ([10.10.100.125]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.servers.nat (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Mar 2001 14:14:32 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB8B728.68A036D5@gactr.uga.edu> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:14:00 -0500 From: "Robin P. Blanchard" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: buildworld for alternate target Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG how do i specify an alternate builddir (other than /usr/obj) so that i might build a separate obj that is optimized for my 486 (my current build is optimized for 686)? -- ------------------------------------ Robin P. Blanchard IT Program Specialist Georgia Center for Continuing Ed. fon: 706.542.2404 fax: 706.542.6546 email: Robin_Blanchard@gactr.uga.edu ------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 6:22:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388F937B726 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:22:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by thehousleys.net (8.11.3/8.11.2) id f2LEMLf54742; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:22:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) (authenticated) by thehousleys.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2LEMJL54734; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:22:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <3AB8B91B.4B0DEDFF@thehousleys.net> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:22:19 -0500 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robin P. Blanchard" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld for alternate target References: <3AB8B728.68A036D5@gactr.uga.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Robin P. Blanchard" wrote: > > how do i specify an alternate builddir (other than /usr/obj) > so that i might build a separate obj that is optimized for > my 486 (my current build is optimized for 686)? > One way, if you get no other responses, is this: cd /usr ln -s src src-486 cd /usr/src ; make CPUTYPE=i686 buildworld cd /usr/src-486 ; make CPUTYPE=i486 buildworld For awhile I had 2 source trees, 3.X and 4.X. What this will do is build into /usr/obj/usr/src and /usr/obj/usr/src-486. Then on you 486 machine you will need to do: mkdir /usr/src-486 mount buildmachine:/usr/src-486 /usr/src-486 mount buildmachine:/usr/obj /usr/obj And on the i686 class machines: mount buildmachine:/usr/src /usr/src mount buildmachine:/usr/obj /usr/obj The only other catch is on the i486 machines you will need to run mergemaster as: mergemaster -m /usr/src-486/etc Jim -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- jeh@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve jim@TheHousleys.Net http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 6:37:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A77637B73F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:37:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cdf.lists@fxp.org) Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id E5FA613614; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:36:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:36:34 -0500 From: Chris Faulhaber To: "Robin P. Blanchard" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: buildworld for alternate target Message-ID: <20010321093633.A1716@peitho.fxp.org> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber , "Robin P. Blanchard" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3AB8B728.68A036D5@gactr.uga.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AB8B728.68A036D5@gactr.uga.edu>; from Robin_Blanchard@gactr.uga.edu on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:14:00AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:14:00AM -0500, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: > how do i specify an alternate builddir (other than /usr/obj) > so that i might build a separate obj that is optimized for > my 486 (my current build is optimized for 686)? >=20 $ grep "/usr/obj" /usr/src/Makefile.inc1=20 MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX?=3D /usr/obj $=20 (i.e. 'make MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=3D/usr/obj.486 buildworld) --=20 Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: FreeBSD: The Power To Serve iEYEARECAAYFAjq4vHEACgkQObaG4P6BelCfQwCfQ7WJNGSn7cIQTEO1OA5npd/E EjkAn2XUWYk7fu2Tvu4U3T2xMpzyxCUe =HlQx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 6:47:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from agena.meridian-enviro.com (thunder.meridian-enviro.com [207.109.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C98E37B73B; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:47:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Received: from localhost.meridian-enviro.com (kfarms.meridian-enviro.com [10.10.10.20]) by agena.meridian-enviro.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2LEkaQ98478; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:46:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:46:35 -0600 Message-ID: <87d7bb5gdw.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> From: rand@meridian-enviro.com To: Mike Smith Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Tancsa , bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-Reply-To: <200103210258.f2L2wGO00829@mass.dis.org> References: <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <200103210258.f2L2wGO00829@mass.dis.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: $L%T~#'9fAQ])o]A][d7EH`V;"_;2K;TEPQB=v]rDf_2s% Mike, thanks for all your help and the time you've invested in Doug> this! What we can do to assist? Mike> Do you have any coding experience? I can't reproduce this here, Mike> but what I want to do is see what the command that's stuck on Mike> the busy queue looks like. Sure, sounds like fun. Mike> If you can add another function like twe_printstate that invokes Mike> twe_print_request on each of the requests on the busy queue and Mike> let me know what they look like, that might give me some clues. I'll do that today. Mike> (I'd send you diffs, but I'm snowed at work and quite ill just Mike> now 8(...) Hope you feel better. I've never seen that smilie before, is that for projectile vomiting? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 6:59:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F89D37B73F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:59:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2LEwks79664; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:58:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103211458.f2LEwks79664@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: Valentin Nechayev Cc: Nick Slager , "Brett G. Lemoine" , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:10:44 +0200." <20010321091044.A307@iv.nn.kiev.ua> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:58:46 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:43:28, nicks (Nick Slager) wrote about "Re: ahc - Inv >alidating pack": S80D is a firmware revision that should be avoided at all costs. Perhaps some of the performance improvements I've make recently exacerbate the issues with this firmware revision, but I've yet to be able to install on disks with that revision. My guess is that it is really da1 that is causing your problems. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 6:59:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marlo.eagle.ca (marlo.eagle.ca [209.167.16.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACAF37B744 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 06:59:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freymann@eagle.ca) Received: from phantom (phantom.eagle.ca [209.167.16.15]) by marlo.eagle.ca (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f2LEvpg22261 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:57:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freymann@eagle.ca) Message-ID: <012601c0b217$bbb81810$0f10a7d1@phantom> Reply-To: "Gerald T. Freymann" From: "Gerald T. Freymann" To: References: <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com><200103210258.f2L2wGO00829@mass.dis.org> <87d7bb5gdw.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> Subject: Selecting 4.3-Release via CVSUP when it's available Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:00:56 -0500 Organization: eagle.ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This may be a completely stoooopid question, but... When 4.3 is Released... I would like to update three of our production boxes to it. But I don't want the -stable I'd like to get the snapshot of the release version. Can you specify this directly somehow? in my stable-supfile right now, I have: *default host=cvsup.ca.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all tag=. This gets me the latest and works fine... but how would one go about specifying the RELEASEd version? or hell, does it even matter really. -Gerry. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 7: 9: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A7037B71A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:09:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tsikora@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.2.168.159]) by femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010321150559.TUOI22629.femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com@home.com> for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:05:59 -0800 Message-ID: <3AB8C387.2265B68@home.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:06:47 -0500 From: Ted Sikora Reply-To: tsikora@powerusersbbs.com Organization: Jtl Development Group X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19pre17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en-US, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: microuptime() went backwards References: <20010320231919.A23244@laptop.os2warp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Scott Lambert wrote: > > I have just encounterred the microuptime() went backwards issue on my > dual PPro 200 box. I have not changed the operating system at all. > > What I have done is change the video card (an ATI Expert 98, PCI), and > compiled XFree86-4.0.3 from ports. I had not used X on this box before. > I then installed X, ran xf86cfg, and exitted xf86cfg. At this point > I had 5 microuptime errors all during the same second. I then tried > to run X but it did not work. I had one microuptime error. I ran > xf86cfg again and created 6 more microuptime errors. Again all > errors happened in the same second. > > I am rebuilding this history from the log files. I did not pay a lot > of attention to the error messages at the time because I knew I had > seen the errors mentioned on the mailling lists and assumed I could > fix it later. > > Two minutes later I have another 5 messages in one second. I think I > editted the XF86Config file by hand in those two minutes then popped > back into xf86cfg to check some things. After that it gets fuzzy. > > It seems that they only happenned while playing with xf86cfg or xvidtune. > Most of the errors in my log showed up during the time that I think I > was playing with xvidtune. During those times there were many more > than 5 microuptime errors per second. Or maybe it just happens while > actively doing something in X. I have spent the rest of the day > building GNOME from ports. It was still building when I left work. > I did use X after the errors end but I was simply runinig top in an > xterm or installing xscreensaver in an xterm. (xscreensaver didn't > want to work, I'm waiting for GNOME to use the GUI config rather than > read the manual tonight. It was time for dinner anyway.) > > Now, I've searched the mailing lists and found two recommendations that > don't seem to apply to me, and thoughts that microuptime errors may > be related to certain Abit mobo's or even AMD processors. I'm posting > this for data that it is not necessarily limited to the newer AMD > related hardware and that APM may not be directly related. > > APM has never been compiled into the kernel on this machine. The > sysctl variable is set to what was reccomended: > > $ sysctl kern.timecounter.method > kern.timecounter.method: 0 > > Could the video card be busmastering too long and not allowing the > kernel to get timer readings on time? ie. a bus contention issue? > I just started getting them on an older AMD K6-II powered server. Strange that they just appereared now. I haven't done a buildworld on it in a while.. maybe 2 months or so but I did do a cvsup/kernelbuild a few weeks ago. I rebooted and so far nothing yet...28 hours. I did a recent HD upgrade but that was at least 2 months ago.I would think the problem wouuld have surfaced sooner. My settings are the same for APM. -- Ted Sikora Jtl Development Group http://powerusersbbs.com Linux the choice of a GNU generation............ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 7:21: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from harp.wrdp.com (harp.dublin.wrdp.net [212.147.130.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AEE37B71D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:20:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jraftery@wrdp.com) Received: from JRAFTERY (jraftery.dublin.wrdp.net [172.16.4.52]) by harp.wrdp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AF5F10B45 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:19:25 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <00d601c0b21a$52c80d30$340410ac@JRAFTERY> From: "James Raftery" To: References: <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com><200103210258.f2L2wGO00829@mass.dis.org> <87d7bb5gdw.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <012601c0b217$bbb81810$0f10a7d1@phantom> Subject: Re: Selecting 4.3-Release via CVSUP when it's available Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:19:29 -0000 Organization: Worldport Communications Inc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald T. Freymann" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 3:00 PM Subject: Selecting 4.3-Release via CVSUP when it's available > When 4.3 is Released... I would like to update three of our production > boxes to it. But I don't want the -stable I'd like to get the snapshot of > the release version. > Can you specify this directly somehow? It's in the CVSUP section of the Handbook at: http://www.freebsd.org/docs/en/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VE RS Regards, james To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 7:23:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from geijer.it.uu.se (geijer.it.uu.se [130.238.15.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C1F37B71E for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:23:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ertr1013@csd.uu.se) Received: (from ertr1013@localhost) by geijer.it.uu.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA27241; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:21:16 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:21:16 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: "Gerald T. Freymann" Cc: Subject: Re: Selecting 4.3-Release via CVSUP when it's available Message-ID: <20010321162114.A27186@student.uu.se> References: <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com><200103210258.f2L2wGO00829@mass.dis.org> <87d7bb5gdw.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <012601c0b217$bbb81810$0f10a7d1@phantom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <012601c0b217$bbb81810$0f10a7d1@phantom>; from freymann@eagle.ca on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:00:56AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:00:56AM -0500, Gerald T. Freymann wrote: > This may be a completely stoooopid question, but... > > When 4.3 is Released... I would like to update three of our production > boxes to it. But I don't want the -stable I'd like to get the snapshot of > the release version. > > Can you specify this directly somehow? yes, of course. > > in my stable-supfile right now, I have: > > *default host=cvsup.ca.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > src-all > ports-all tag=. > > This gets me the latest and works fine... but how would one go about > specifying the RELEASEd version? or hell, does it even matter really. > > -Gerry. > Just use tag=RELENG_4_3_0_RELEASE instead of your current values for tag= This will get you 4.3-RELEASE -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 7:27:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marlo.eagle.ca (marlo.eagle.ca [209.167.16.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EF337B723 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:27:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freymann@eagle.ca) Received: from phantom (phantom.eagle.ca [209.167.16.15]) by marlo.eagle.ca (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f2LFPsg27388 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:25:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freymann@eagle.ca) Message-ID: <015901c0b21b$a7009bf0$0f10a7d1@phantom> Reply-To: "Gerald T. Freymann" From: "Gerald T. Freymann" To: References: <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com><200103210258.f2L2wGO00829@mass.dis.org> <87d7bb5gdw.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <012601c0b217$bbb81810$0f10a7d1@phantom> <20010321162114.A27186@student.uu.se> Subject: Re: Selecting 4.3-Release via CVSUP when it's available Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:29:00 -0500 Organization: eagle.ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Can you specify this directly somehow? > Just use tag=RELENG_4_3_0_RELEASE instead of your current values for tag= > This will get you 4.3-RELEASE Perfect ! Thanks guys. -Gerry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 7:47:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from normanet.org (ACaen-101-2-1-7.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.7.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CAA537B72A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:47:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.boucey@normanet.fr) Received: (qmail 30043 invoked by uid 0); 21 Mar 2001 15:49:55 -0000 Received: from by nux2.normanet.org with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.064957 secs); 21/03/2001 16:49:55 Received: from daemon.normanet.org (192.168.1.114) by normanet.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 15:49:54 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:55:30 +0000 (GMT) From: Michel Boucey X-Sender: mic@daemon.normanet.org To: Odhiambo Washington Cc: FBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: Buildworld Fails In-Reply-To: <20010321165153.A91330@poeza.iconnect.co.ke> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, I've got a same trouble during buildworld ... Cordialement, Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@Net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I have failure at the point below after a cvsup today: >=20 > cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE > -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c > rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_IDEA > -DL_ENDIAN - > DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ > include -c > /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/ssl_ > rsa.c -o ssl_rsa.po > cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE > -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c > rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_IDEA > -DL_ENDIAN - > DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ > include -c > /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/ssl_ > sess.c -o ssl_sess.po > cc: Internal compiler error: program as got fatal signal 11 > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/src. >=20 > Has it been seen by anyone??? Or even discussed in the list, witha remedy= ? >=20 >=20 > -Wash >=20 > -- > Odhiambo Washington Inter-Connect Ltd., > wash@iconnect.co.ke 5th Flr Furaha Plaza > Tel: 254 11 222604 Nkrumah Rd., > Fax: 254 11 222636 PO Box 83613 MOMBASA, KE. >=20 > He that is giddy thinks the world turns round. -William Shakespeare, "The= =20 > Taming of the Shrew"=20 >=20 >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 7:48:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hera.ik.bme.hu (hera.ik.bme.hu [152.66.243.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B258537B729 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:48:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mohacsi@hera.ik.bme.hu) Received: from localhost (mohacsi@localhost) by hera.ik.bme.hu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA07913 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:48:01 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:48:00 +0100 (MET) From: Mohacsi Janos To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Is it necessary install kerberos in FreeBSD 4.2 and 4.3? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Probably I found a bug in the /stand/sysinstall. If I install from floppies or CD and I select the minimal distribution set I get components to be installed: binary set cryto set kerberos 4 kerberos 5 I guess the minimal set is the binary and the crypto set. If I deselect kerberos 4 and kerberos 5and install the disribution set, I got a completly working minimal system. If it is a feature, I can admit. However I upgrade our main freebsd systems from source and I never install either kerberos 4 or kerberos 5. Thanks, Janos Mohacsi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 7:57:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from siafu.iconnect.co.ke (upagraha.iconnect.co.ke [209.198.248.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16FE37B72E for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:57:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wash@poeza.iconnect.co.ke) Received: from [212.22.161.3] (helo=ns2.iconnect.co.ke) by siafu.iconnect.co.ke with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14fkxG-000Cgh-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:55:22 +0300 Received: from amavis by ns2.iconnect.co.ke with scanned-ok (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14fkyj-000Mjp-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:56:53 +0300 Received: from host-64-110-74-50.interpacket.net ([64.110.74.50] helo=poeza.iconnect.co.ke) by ns2.iconnect.co.ke with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14fkyK-000MJq-00; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:56:30 +0300 Received: from wash by poeza.iconnect.co.ke with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14fl0P-000OKW-00; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:58:37 +0300 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:58:37 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: Michel Boucey Cc: FBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: Buildworld Fails Message-ID: <20010321185837.B93424@poeza.iconnect.co.ke> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , Michel Boucey , FBSD-STABLE References: <20010321165153.A91330@poeza.iconnect.co.ke> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from "Michel Boucey" on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 04:55:30PM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD poeza.iconnect.co.ke 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Location: Mombasa, KE, East Africa Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Michel Boucey [20010321 18:50]: writing on the sub= ject 'Re: Buildworld Fails' Michel>=20 Michel> Yes, I've got a same trouble during buildworld ... Michel>=20 Michel> Cordialement, I did a make clean in /usr/src and cvsupped again and all went well - I have no reason as to why though.... Well another question, when i do man sendmail on this box I get nothing!!! I know where to get the sendmail documents but I am only curios as to why on another box running 4.2-STABLE I get a man page displayed. Any ideas?? Michel>=20 Michel> Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me Michel> > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@Net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < Michel>=20 Michel>=20 Michel> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Odhiambo Washington wrote: Michel>=20 Michel> > I have failure at the point below after a cvsup today: Michel> >=20 Michel> > cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE Michel> > -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c Michel> > rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_ID= EA Michel> > -DL_ENDIAN - Michel> > DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA Michel> > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ Michel> > include -c Michel> > /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/= ssl_ Michel> > rsa.c -o ssl_rsa.po Michel> > cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE Michel> > -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c Michel> > rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_ID= EA Michel> > -DL_ENDIAN - Michel> > DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA Michel> > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ Michel> > include -c Michel> > /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/= ssl_ Michel> > sess.c -o ssl_sess.po Michel> > cc: Internal compiler error: program as got fatal signal 11 Michel> > *** Error code 1 Michel> > Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl. Michel> > *** Error code 1 Michel> > Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib. Michel> > *** Error code 1 Michel> > Stop in /usr/src. Michel> > *** Error code 1 Michel> > Stop in /usr/src. Michel> >=20 Michel> > Has it been seen by anyone??? Or even discussed in the list, with= a remedy? Michel> >=20 -Wash -- Odhiambo Washington Inter-Connect Ltd., wash@iconnect.co.ke 5th Flr Furaha Plaza Tel: 254 11 222604 Nkrumah Rd., Fax: 254 11 222636 PO Box 83613 MOMBASA, KE. In the arithmetic of love, one plus one equals everything, and two minus on= e=20 equals nothing. -Mignon McLaughlin=20 (contributed by Chris Johnston)=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 8: 3:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E3337B739 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:03:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id IAA17057; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:01:38 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda17055; Wed Mar 21 08:01:36 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f2LG1VC39492; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:01:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdA39490; Wed Mar 21 08:00:45 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.3/8.9.1) id f2LG0iN07613; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:00:44 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103211600.f2LG0iN07613@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdWp7600; Wed Mar 21 07:59:48 2001 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-Sender: schubert To: Michel Boucey Cc: Odhiambo Washington , FBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: Buildworld Fails In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:55:30 GMT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:59:48 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Michel Boucey writes: > = > Yes, I've got a same trouble during buildworld ... You've got hardware problems. Replacing bad memory, bad CPU, or = improving the cooling to your CPU will resolve this problem. I had = similar problems, however cleaning the dust from the CPU fan of my P120 = solved my problem. I was told that if I had a faster (hotter running) = CPU and the fan was clogged with dust, the CPU would have been = permanently damanged. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC > = > Cordialement, > = > Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@Net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < > = > = > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > = > > I have failure at the point below after a cvsup today: > > = > > cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE > > -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c > > rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_IDEA > > -DL_ENDIAN - > > DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA > > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ > > include -c > > /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/ssl_= > > rsa.c -o ssl_rsa.po > > cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE > > -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c > > rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_IDEA > > -DL_ENDIAN - > > DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA > > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ > > include -c > > /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/ssl_= > > sess.c -o ssl_sess.po > > cc: Internal compiler error: program as got fatal signal 11 > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl. > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib. > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > = > > Has it been seen by anyone??? Or even discussed in the list, witha re= medy? > > = > > = > > -Wash > > = > > -- > > Odhiambo Washington Inter-Connect Ltd., > > wash@iconnect.co.ke 5th Flr Furaha Plaza > > Tel: 254 11 222604 Nkrumah Rd., > > Fax: 254 11 222636 PO Box 83613 MOMBASA, KE. > > = > > He that is giddy thinks the world turns round. -William Shakespeare, = "The = > > Taming of the Shrew" = > > = > > = > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > = > = > = > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 8:16:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from normanet.org (ACaen-101-2-1-7.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.7.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CF1537B739 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:16:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.boucey@normanet.fr) Received: (qmail 30161 invoked by uid 0); 21 Mar 2001 16:17:42 -0000 Received: from by nux2.normanet.org with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.066742 secs); 21/03/2001 17:17:41 Received: from daemon.normanet.org (192.168.1.114) by normanet.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 16:17:41 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:23:17 +0000 (GMT) From: Michel Boucey X-Sender: mic@daemon.normanet.org To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: Michel Boucey , Odhiambo Washington , FBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: Buildworld Fails In-Reply-To: <200103211600.f2LG0iN07613@cwsys.cwsent.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, I read this in FAQ ... I gonna try to clean my machine ... Cordialement, Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@Net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > In message > , Michel > Boucey writes: > >=20 > > Yes, I've got a same trouble during buildworld ... >=20 > You've got hardware problems. Replacing bad memory, bad CPU, or=20 > improving the cooling to your CPU will resolve this problem. I had=20 > similar problems, however cleaning the dust from the CPU fan of my P120= =20 > solved my problem. I was told that if I had a faster (hotter running)=20 > CPU and the fan was clogged with dust, the CPU would have been=20 > permanently damanged. >=20 >=20 > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca > Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA > Province of BC >=20 > >=20 > > Cordialement, > >=20 > > Michel Boucey Administrateur Syst=E8me > > > Soci=E9t=E9 Norm@Net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < > >=20 > >=20 > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >=20 > > > I have failure at the point below after a cvsup today: > > >=20 > > > cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE > > > -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c > > > rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_IDEA > > > -DL_ENDIAN - > > > DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA > > > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ > > > include -c > > > /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/ssl_ > > > rsa.c -o ssl_rsa.po > > > cc -pg -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE > > > -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../c > > > rypto/openssl/crypto -I/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl -DNO_IDEA > > > -DL_ENDIAN - > > > DSHA1_ASM -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DNO_IDEA > > > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/ > > > include -c > > > /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/../ssl/ssl_ > > > sess.c -o ssl_sess.po > > > cc: Internal compiler error: program as got fatal signal 11 > > > *** Error code 1 > > > Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl. > > > *** Error code 1 > > > Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib. > > > *** Error code 1 > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > > *** Error code 1 > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > >=20 > > > Has it been seen by anyone??? Or even discussed in the list, witha re= medy? > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > -Wash > > >=20 > > > -- > > > Odhiambo Washington Inter-Connect Ltd., > > > wash@iconnect.co.ke 5th Flr Furaha Plaza > > > Tel: 254 11 222604 Nkrumah Rd., > > > Fax: 254 11 222636 PO Box 83613 MOMBASA, KE. > > >=20 > > > He that is giddy thinks the world turns round. -William Shakespeare, = "The=20 > > > Taming of the Shrew"=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message >=20 >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 8:35: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from siafu.iconnect.co.ke (upagraha.iconnect.co.ke [209.198.248.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECC237B722 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:34:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wash@poeza.iconnect.co.ke) Received: from [212.22.161.3] (helo=ns2.iconnect.co.ke) by siafu.iconnect.co.ke with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14flX9-000EGe-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:32:27 +0300 Received: from amavis by ns2.iconnect.co.ke with scanned-ok (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14flYc-000H0X-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:33:58 +0300 Received: from host-64-110-74-50.interpacket.net ([64.110.74.50] helo=poeza.iconnect.co.ke) by ns2.iconnect.co.ke with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14flYV-000Gt8-00; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:33:52 +0300 Received: from wash by poeza.iconnect.co.ke with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14flaa-000OR7-00; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:36:00 +0300 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:36:00 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: David Wolfskill Cc: FBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: Buildworld Fails Message-ID: <20010321193600.A93906@poeza.iconnect.co.ke> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , David Wolfskill , FBSD-STABLE References: <20010321185837.B93424@poeza.iconnect.co.ke> <200103211602.f2LG2iH96157@pau-amma.whistle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103211602.f2LG2iH96157@pau-amma.whistle.com>; from "David Wolfskill" on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 08:02:44AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD poeza.iconnect.co.ke 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Location: Mombasa, KE, East Africa Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * David Wolfskill [20010321 19:06]: writing on the subjec= t 'Re: Buildworld Fails' David> >Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:58:37 +0300 David> >From: Odhiambo Washington David>=20 David> >I did a make clean in /usr/src and cvsupped again and all went well= - I David> >have no reason as to why though.... David>=20 David> You may have managed to get an inconsistent set of updates when you David> CVSupped previously: CVS is not a "database", where you can do an David> "atomic commit" of several changes at once. David>=20 David> >Well another question, when i do man sendmail on this box I get not= hing!!! David> >I know where to get the sendmail documents but I am only curios as = to why David> >on another box running 4.2-STABLE I get a man page displayed. Any i= deas?? David>=20 David> Works for me as of yesterday's 4.3-BETA; I'm in the process of build= ing David> today's. Is there a way I can do a 'deliberate regeneration' of such man pages, just in case they got gobbled for some reason? Thanks to everyone for all help. -Wash -- Odhiambo Washington Inter-Connect Ltd., wash@iconnect.co.ke 5th Flr Furaha Plaza Tel: 254 11 222604 Nkrumah Rd., Fax: 254 11 222636 PO Box 83613 MOMBASA, KE. Do you buy all these books retail or do you send away for, like, a shrink k= it=20 that comes with all these volumes included? -Will Hunting (Matt Damon), "Go= od=20 Will Hunting"=20 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6uNhwA2k+MNyI/bERAtHKAJ426KF4zA7obY/ZhxIGE3gYVJgHggCfcKXx hUrN6PBpZ6BzXVrtnTScLOs= =Wyfk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 9:23:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BADB37B725 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:23:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2LHNa226115; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:23:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:23:36 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jan Conrad Cc: Matt Dillon , Gordon Tetlow , Rich Morin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS performance Message-ID: <20010321092336.A12319@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <200103201911.f2KJBAR96066@earth.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:43:15PM +0100 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jan Conrad [010321 05:43] wrote: > ok - to sum up a bit.. > > - for a good LAN, use UDP > - use v3 (this is what I thought) > - use standard data sizes > > but still... > > Our network connection between client and server is going directly over a > BaySwitch 450 24T, all interfaces set to 100baseTX, half-duplex. > So the LAN is good. > We run 4 nfsd's and 4 nfsiods on each machine. > > I did the mount as 'mount_nfs ....' > Even so 'mount' does'nt show, I suppose I made a v3 mount (from the > source code of mount_nfs). > BTW, is there any way to figure that out? When in doubt run tcpdump. I really doubt that you're maxing out at ~3MB/sec, I've done 11MB/sec on 100mb ether before. > Do you know what actually determines the writing speed in a case like > our's? Network or disk? Y'know, it would be a hell of a lot easier to figure out what was wrong if you showed us the mount flags you're using. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 9:27:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 406D637B738 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:27:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 36669 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 17:27:47 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:27:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 4158 invoked by uid 145); 21 Mar 2001 17:27:47 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:27:47 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:27:47 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Matt Dillon , Gordon Tetlow , Rich Morin , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: <20010321092336.A12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jan Conrad [010321 05:43] wrote: > > ok - to sum up a bit.. > > > > - for a good LAN, use UDP > > - use v3 (this is what I thought) > > - use standard data sizes > > > > but still... > > > > Our network connection between client and server is going directly over a > > BaySwitch 450 24T, all interfaces set to 100baseTX, half-duplex. > > So the LAN is good. > > We run 4 nfsd's and 4 nfsiods on each machine. > > > > I did the mount as 'mount_nfs ....' > > Even so 'mount' does'nt show, I suppose I made a v3 mount (from the > > source code of mount_nfs). > > BTW, is there any way to figure that out? > > When in doubt run tcpdump. I really doubt that you're maxing out > at ~3MB/sec, I've done 11MB/sec on 100mb ether before. > > > Do you know what actually determines the writing speed in a case like > > our's? Network or disk? > > Y'know, it would be a hell of a lot easier to figure out what was > wrong if you showed us the mount flags you're using. client: einstein server: merlin client: mount_nfs merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt 'mount' gives: merlin:/freebsd/misc on /mnt (nfs) ifconfig fxp0: fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 131.220.161.127 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.220.163.255 ether 00:90:27:1c:f3:79 media: 100baseTX status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP server: fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 131.220.161.121 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.220.163.255 ether 00:02:b3:1f:f8:c5 media: 100baseTX status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP -Jan > > > > -- Physikalisches Institut der Universitaet Bonn Nussallee 12 D-53115 Bonn GERMANY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 9:37: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6F6B37B73E for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:37:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 36716 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 17:33:43 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:33:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 4172 invoked by uid 145); 21 Mar 2001 17:33:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:33:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:33:43 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Matt Dillon , Gordon Tetlow , Rich Morin , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: <20010321092336.A12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG to add some data: before dd client: netstat -i Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll fxp0 1500 00:02:b3:1f:f8:c5 1901001 0 771611 0 208240 fxp0 1500 131.220.160/2 merlin 2855995 - 2395666 - - lo0 16384 1624909 0 1624909 0 0 lo0 16384 127 localhost 80 - 80 - - server: netstat -i Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll fxp0 1500 00:90:27:1c:f3:79 7157753 0 4648694 0 2661459 fxp0 1500 131.220.160/2 einstein 11721570 - 10812723 - - lo0 16384 6168347 0 6168347 0 0 lo0 16384 127 localhost 92 - 92 - - dd if=/dev/zero of=zero bs=16k count=64x100 104857600 bytes transferred in 42.430910 secs (2471255 bytes/sec) afterwards: client: netstat -i Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll fxp0 1500 00:02:b3:1f:f8:c5 1980833 0 786612 0 230703 fxp0 1500 131.220.160/2 merlin 2938252 - 2413439 - - lo0 16384 1627675 0 1627675 0 0 lo0 16384 127 localhost 80 - 80 - - server: netstat -i Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll fxp0 1500 00:90:27:1c:f3:79 7172808 0 4728002 0 2674322 fxp0 1500 131.220.160/2 einstein 11738102 - 10893714 - - lo0 16384 6170041 0 6170041 0 0 lo0 16384 127 localhost 92 - 92 - - On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jan Conrad [010321 05:43] wrote: > > ok - to sum up a bit.. > > > > - for a good LAN, use UDP > > - use v3 (this is what I thought) > > - use standard data sizes > > > > but still... > > > > Our network connection between client and server is going directly over a > > BaySwitch 450 24T, all interfaces set to 100baseTX, half-duplex. > > So the LAN is good. > > We run 4 nfsd's and 4 nfsiods on each machine. > > > > I did the mount as 'mount_nfs ....' > > Even so 'mount' does'nt show, I suppose I made a v3 mount (from the > > source code of mount_nfs). > > BTW, is there any way to figure that out? > > When in doubt run tcpdump. I really doubt that you're maxing out > at ~3MB/sec, I've done 11MB/sec on 100mb ether before. > > > Do you know what actually determines the writing speed in a case like > > our's? Network or disk? > > Y'know, it would be a hell of a lot easier to figure out what was > wrong if you showed us the mount flags you're using. > > > > -- Physikalisches Institut der Universitaet Bonn Nussallee 12 D-53115 Bonn GERMANY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 9:41:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A1437B72A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:41:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2LHd6026566; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:39:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:39:06 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jan Conrad Cc: Matt Dillon , Gordon Tetlow , Rich Morin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS performance Message-ID: <20010321093906.E12319@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010321092336.A12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:27:47PM +0100 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jan Conrad [010321 09:27] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > Do you know what actually determines the writing speed in a case like > > > our's? Network or disk? > > > > Y'know, it would be a hell of a lot easier to figure out what was > > wrong if you showed us the mount flags you're using. > > client: einstein > server: merlin > > client: > mount_nfs merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt > > 'mount' gives: > merlin:/freebsd/misc on /mnt (nfs) Oh come on now, you didn't do a single thing that I asked you to! Did you bother to read the mount_nfs manpage? *slap* try this: mount -t nfs \ -o nfsv3,tcp,intr,rdirplus,-r=32768,-w=32768 \ merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 9:53: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDA637B738 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:53:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2LHp0N93101; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:51:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:51:00 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Jan Conrad Cc: Alfred Perlstein , Matt Dillon , Rich Morin , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Jan Conrad wrote: > ifconfig fxp0: > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 131.220.161.127 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.220.163.255 > ether 00:90:27:1c:f3:79 > media: 100baseTX status: active > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX > 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP > > server: > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 131.220.161.121 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.220.163.255 > ether 00:02:b3:1f:f8:c5 > media: 100baseTX status: active > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX > 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP As an aside you probably want to force to 100baseTx if you are using a switch. -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 9:57:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dataloss.net (massive.dataloss.net [212.189.232.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB60D37B719 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:57:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@dataloss.net) Received: (qmail 38123 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Mar 2001 17:46:48 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:46:48 +0100 From: Peter van Dijk To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS performance Message-ID: <20010321184648.J292@dataloss.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from gordont@bluemtn.net on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:51:00AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:51:00AM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote: [snip] > > As an aside you probably want to force to 100baseTx if you > are using a switch. He said he was doing half-duplex. Let's just hope his switch settings match those on his machines. Greetz, Peter -- dataloss networks '/ignore-ance is bliss' - me 'Het leven is een stuiterbal, maar de mijne plakt aan t plafond!' - me To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 9:57:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54F8137B742 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:57:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 36880 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 17:56:09 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:56:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 4202 invoked by uid 145); 21 Mar 2001 17:56:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:56:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:56:08 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Matt Dillon , Gordon Tetlow , Rich Morin , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: <20010321093906.E12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jan Conrad [010321 09:27] wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > > Do you know what actually determines the writing speed in a case like > > > > our's? Network or disk? > > > > > > Y'know, it would be a hell of a lot easier to figure out what was > > > wrong if you showed us the mount flags you're using. > > > > client: einstein > > server: merlin > > > > client: > > mount_nfs merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt > > > > 'mount' gives: > > merlin:/freebsd/misc on /mnt (nfs) > > Oh come on now, you didn't do a single thing that I asked you to! > > Did you bother to read the mount_nfs manpage? I did > > *slap* :-) got it > > try this: > > mount -t nfs \ > -o nfsv3,tcp,intr,rdirplus,-r=32768,-w=32768 \ > merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt works good, dd gives now 4.6 Mb/s mounting without tcp gives 8.7Mb/s thats great! thank you all very much -Jan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 9:58: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from web13207.mail.yahoo.com (web13207.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.192]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86E9E37B74A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:57:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lipshitz909@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010321160046.59610.qmail@web13207.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.167.135.253] by web13207.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:00:46 PST Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:00:46 -0800 (PST) From: Larry Librettez Subject: Cannot su to root in X terminal with 4.3-BETA To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After upgrading to 4.3-BETA, I find I cannot su to root in a terminal window (rxvt, xterm) in X (XFree86-3.3.6 with either GNOME or KDE). Even if I enter the correct password, the su login gets rejected (and yes, user is member of wheel group). The logs report `BAD SU LIPSHITZ to root on ttyp0`. However, in a plain terminal (not in X), I CAN su to root as a regular user. Prior to upgrading to 4.3-BETA (kernel + userland), I was able to su to root in X in 4.2-STABLE. I tried adding `secureī after the ttyp entries in /etc/ttys but that didnīt help. I did both mergemaster and MAKEDEV all during my rebuild. I specifically re-made the ttyp* devices. I even typed out the su password on the terminal to make sure it shows correctly and it does. On a separate box using 4.2-STABLE I upgraded only the kernel to 4.3-BETA (same 4.2-STABLE userland), and the problem still occurred - couldnīt su to root in an X terminal. Is the problem in the kernel? A bug? A DoS? I cvsupīd 3 times and rebuilded 3 times with no change in this problem. How do I fix this? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 10: 4: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E41F37B744 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:58:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 36897 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 17:57:39 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:57:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 4209 invoked by uid 145); 21 Mar 2001 17:57:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:57:39 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:57:39 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Gordon Tetlow Cc: Alfred Perlstein , Matt Dillon , Rich Morin , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Jan Conrad wrote: > > > ifconfig fxp0: > > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 131.220.161.127 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.220.163.255 > > ether 00:90:27:1c:f3:79 > > media: 100baseTX status: active > > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX > > 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP > > > > server: > > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 131.220.161.121 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.220.163.255 > > ether 00:02:b3:1f:f8:c5 > > media: 100baseTX status: active > > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX > > 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP > > As an aside you probably want to force to 100baseTx if you > are using a switch. I'll try to convince the administrator of that switch (very difficult) > > -gordon > -Jan -- Physikalisches Institut der Universitaet Bonn Nussallee 12 D-53115 Bonn GERMANY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:32:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from terra.talksport.net (terra.talksport.net [195.52.75.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444C137B729 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:32:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from IVaudrey@talksport.co.uk) Received: from hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk [172.16.2.6]) by terra.talksport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1E425D07 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:12:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hfxchng01.talksport.co.uk (unverified) by hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:11:46 +0000 Received: by hfexchange.talksport.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1ZN5NVM4>; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:11:46 -0000 Message-ID: <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E24366C@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> From: Ian Vaudrey To: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org'" Cc: "'gibbs@scsiguy.com'" Subject: RE: ahc - Invalidating pack Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:11:41 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG That may possibly explain the trouble Valentin Nechayev is experiencing, but Brett G Lemoine is using Seagate drives while I am using a Quantum unit and we are seeing something that appears to be very similar. Jordan Hubbard also reported what seems to be the same problem occurring with Quantum drives. Do you have any idea why we are seeing these problems? The only common factor at first glance is a recent revision of the ahc driver. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help pin this down. References: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable%40freebsd.org/msg26369.html http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable%40freebsd.org/msg26152.html http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable%40freebsd.org/msg25870.html - Ian > -----Original Message----- > FROM: Justin T. Gibbs > DATE: 03/21/2001 06:58:46 > SUBJECT: RE: ahc - Invalidating pack > >S80D is a firmware revision that should be avoided at all costs. >Perhaps some of the performance improvements I've make recently >exacerbate the issues with this firmware revision, but I've yet >to be able to install on disks with that revision. My guess is >that it is really da1 that is causing your problems. > >-- >Justin > > ************************************************** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify postmaster@thewirelessgroup.net immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of The Wireless Group. ************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:36:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB45D37B720 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:36:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2LI0GA27233; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:00:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:00:15 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jan Conrad Cc: Gordon Tetlow , Matt Dillon , Rich Morin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS performance Message-ID: <20010321100015.J12319@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:57:39PM +0100 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jan Conrad [010321 09:57] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > > As an aside you probably want to force to 100baseTx if you > > are using a switch. > > I'll try to convince the administrator of that switch (very difficult) He meant on the interface on the machine via ifconfig on your box. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:36:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4912B37B71A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:36:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2LI3R627336; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:03:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:03:27 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jan Conrad Cc: Gordon Tetlow , Matt Dillon , Rich Morin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS performance Message-ID: <20010321100327.K12319@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010321100015.J12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:01:50PM +0100 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jan Conrad [010321 10:01] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > * Jan Conrad [010321 09:57] wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > > > > > > As an aside you probably want to force to 100baseTx if you > > > > are using a switch. > > > > > > I'll try to convince the administrator of that switch (very difficult) > > > > He meant on the interface on the machine via ifconfig on your box. > > > > > The switch in configured to 100baseTX, half-duplex, no auto-sense :-( Ew, NFS over half duplex is "poo". -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:36:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23B237B722 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:36:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2LHxU727156; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:59:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:59:30 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jan Conrad Cc: Matt Dillon , Gordon Tetlow , Rich Morin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS performance Message-ID: <20010321095930.I12319@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010321093906.E12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:56:08PM +0100 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jan Conrad [010321 09:56] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > try this: > > > > mount -t nfs \ > > -o nfsv3,tcp,intr,rdirplus,-r=32768,-w=32768 \ > > merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt > > works good, dd gives now 4.6 Mb/s > > mounting without tcp gives 8.7Mb/s > > thats great! > thank you all very much You owe the NFS Oracle a completed draft of the NFSv4 spec. Seriously though, keep tweaking, you'll probably be able to get even better perf. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:39:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lsmls02.we.mediaone.net (lsmls02.we.mediaone.net [24.130.1.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB57237B722 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:39:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ericmlogan@mediaone.net) Received: from mediaone.net (we-24-130-92-248.we.mediaone.net [24.130.92.248]) by lsmls02.we.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2LJdWS15232 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:39:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3AB90248.90163161@mediaone.net> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:34:32 -0800 From: Eric M Logan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: STABLE Subject: proper way to make kernel... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi everyone. Is it normal to have "make kernel KERNCONF=something" produce a smaller kernel than "config something, cd ../../compile/something, make depend, make, make install"? And if so, why is the former not the preferred way to compile a personalized kernel? Thanks. -- ***************************** Eric M Logan ericmlogan@mediaone.net eric_m_logan@yahoo.com ***************************** Flames to /dev/null plz. :) ***************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:40:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from postal.incyte.com (postal.incyte.com [198.31.37.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE5737B728 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:40:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bl@incyte.com) Received: from blah.incyte.com (blah.incyte.com [10.99.1.40]) by postal.incyte.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2LIvu500892; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:57:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from blah.incyte.com (bl@localhost) by blah.incyte.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA10215; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:57:57 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103211857.KAA10215@blah.incyte.com> X-Authentication-Warning: blah.incyte.com: bl owned process doing -bs To: Nick Slager Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:42:26 +1100." <20010321164225.A49175@albury.net> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:57:57 -0800 From: "Brett G. Lemoine" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Thus spake Brett G. Lemoine (bl@incyte.com): > > > OK, I need help. I'm starting to suspect either FreeBSD just doesn't like > > my motherboard (a Tyan S1837 Thunderbolt), or that I've got a flaky > > on-board scsi controller. I've been getting the following errors > > on both my internal disks (and ocasionally on my jaz drive as well): > > Have you double (and triple) checked your cabling and termination? Yep. Everything seems tight. It could be the PCI controller given the errors from using the sound chips. Unless someone suggests some further debugging, I'm going to replace the motherboard. bl -- //====== Brett G. Lemoine -=- ===============================\\ || Info. Systems Architect | || ||Core Unix System Services| If at first you don't succeed, || || Incyte Genomics | destroy all evidence that you tried. || || Palo Alto, California | || |+-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+| \\== PGP Key Fingerprint: 68 A1 2A 2D 82 CE E9 70 5B 80 D1 11 EC F3 FB 85 ==// To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:47:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gw-nl1.origin-it.com (gw-nl1.origin-it.com [193.79.128.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F25737B72C for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:47:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com) Received: from mail.de.origin-it.com (localhost.origin-it.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl1.origin-it.com with ESMTP id UAA01245; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:47:30 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com) Received: from smtprelay-de1.origin-it.com(172.16.188.53) by gw-nl1.origin-it.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma001243; Wed, 21 Mar 01 20:47:31 +0100 Received: from mailhub.de.origin-it.com (mailhub.de.origin-it.com [172.16.189.20]) by mail.de.origin-it.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id UAA05448; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:47:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (galaxy.de.cp.philips.com [130.143.166.29]) by mailhub.de.origin-it.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/hmo23oct00) with ESMTP id f2LJlRZ84958; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:47:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/hmo14aug98) id UAA03351; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:47:26 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200103211947.UAA03351@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: from Jan Conrad at "Mar 21, 2001 6:57:39 pm" To: conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de (Jan Conrad) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:47:26 +0100 (MET) Cc: gordont@bluemtn.net, bright@wintelcom.net, dillon@earth.backplane.com, rdm@cfcl.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Helge Oldach X-Address: Atos Origin GmbH, Billstrasse 80, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany X-Phone: +49 40 7886 464, Fax: +49 40 7886 235, Mobile: +49 160 4782517 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jan Conrad: >On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Jan Conrad wrote: >> >> > ifconfig fxp0: >> > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> > inet 131.220.161.127 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.220.163.255 >> > ether 00:90:27:1c:f3:79 >> > media: 100baseTX status: active >> > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX >> > 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP >> > >> > server: >> > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> > inet 131.220.161.121 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 131.220.163.255 >> > ether 00:02:b3:1f:f8:c5 >> > media: 100baseTX status: active >> > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX >> > 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP >> >> As an aside you probably want to force to 100baseTx if you >> are using a switch. > >I'll try to convince the administrator of that switch (very difficult) There is a chance that you could do it without bothering the admin. The first thing to do is to look at the collisions (netstat -in). If they are huge (say, >5% of packet total), the switch probably is already at full-duplex, but your machine didn't recognize. In that case you could just ifconfig your NIC and see how it goes. If the collision counter doesn't change even under load, you're done. Otherwise you could try to *force* the switch to "100BaseTX " using the mediaopt option on ifconfig. Make sure to have the link physically disconnected for a second from the switch, so that the switch observes a trigger to re-negotiate. If you are lucky, the switch will understand your NIC's full-duplex offering and align itself properly. In any case you definitely need to verify that the switch went full-duplex, in particular if you can't look at the port setting by means of LEDs or a management station. A simple test would be a flood ping (-f option) to another machine at the same switch (or, better, to the switch's internal management address). If you see significant packet loss, the switch probably didn't grok it. In that case there is no option but to revert to half-duplex. Background: 10/100 auto-negotiation usually works reliably, but duplex negotiation doesn't (and conceptually can't). This is a Bad Thing: While failing 10/100 auto-negotiation will be immediately visible because the NIC just doesn't work at all, failing duplex negotiation won't be immediately obvious. In fact you probably will see all sorts of strange performance issues if one party is at full and the other is at half, but they won't be obviously pointing to the network cable. So be warned. As a side note I've seen good auto-negotiation results with fxp NICs and assorted Catalysts. Helge To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:48:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 978B737B72E for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:48:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 37005 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 18:01:51 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 18:01:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 4249 invoked by uid 145); 21 Mar 2001 18:01:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 18:01:50 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:01:50 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Gordon Tetlow , Matt Dillon , Rich Morin , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: <20010321100015.J12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jan Conrad [010321 09:57] wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > > > > As an aside you probably want to force to 100baseTx if you > > > are using a switch. > > > > I'll try to convince the administrator of that switch (very difficult) > > He meant on the interface on the machine via ifconfig on your box. > > The switch in configured to 100baseTX, half-duplex, no auto-sense :-( -Jan -- Physikalisches Institut der Universitaet Bonn Nussallee 12 D-53115 Bonn GERMANY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:55:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gw-nl1.origin-it.com (gw-nl1.origin-it.com [193.79.128.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE50F37B71B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:55:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com) Received: from mail.de.origin-it.com (localhost.origin-it.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl1.origin-it.com with ESMTP id UAA03768; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:55:05 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com) Received: from smtprelay-de1.origin-it.com(172.16.188.53) by gw-nl1.origin-it.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma003766; Wed, 21 Mar 01 20:55:05 +0100 Received: from mailhub.de.origin-it.com (mailhub.de.origin-it.com [172.16.189.20]) by mail.de.origin-it.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id UAA06031; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:55:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (galaxy.de.cp.philips.com [130.143.166.29]) by mailhub.de.origin-it.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/hmo23oct00) with ESMTP id f2LJt3Z86499; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:55:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/hmo14aug98) id UAA03416; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:55:02 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200103211955.UAA03416@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: from Jan Conrad at "Mar 21, 2001 6:33:43 pm" To: conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de (Jan Conrad) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:55:02 +0100 (MET) Cc: bright@wintelcom.net, dillon@earth.backplane.com, gordont@bluemtn.net, rdm@cfcl.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Helge Oldach X-Address: Atos Origin GmbH, Billstrasse 80, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany X-Phone: +49 40 7886 464, Fax: +49 40 7886 235, Mobile: +49 160 4782517 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jan Conrad: >client: >Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll >fxp0 1500 00:02:b3:1f:f8:c5 1901001 0 771611 0 208240 >server: >Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll >fxp0 1500 00:90:27:1c:f3:79 7157753 0 4648694 0 2661459 Gimme a break. Out of 4648694 output packets you see as many as 2661459 collisions? That's more than 50%, i.e. for about every second packet that you are sending you get a collision! You very clearly have a collision problem. I bet that the switch is at full-duplex while you're at half. Try changing the mediaopt setting of your NIC. Helge To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:59:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailg.telia.com (mailg.telia.com [194.22.194.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1998837B729 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:59:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from d1o913.telia.com (d1o913.telia.com [195.252.44.241]) by mailg.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA06084 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:59:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from ertr1013.student.uu.se (h35n2fls20o913.telia.com [212.181.163.35]) by d1o913.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA28167 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:59:21 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 1897 invoked by uid 1001); 21 Mar 2001 19:59:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:59:24 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: STABLE Subject: Re: proper way to make kernel... Message-ID: <20010321205923.A1882@student.uu.se> Mail-Followup-To: STABLE References: <3AB90248.90163161@mediaone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AB90248.90163161@mediaone.net>; from ericmlogan@mediaone.net on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:34:32AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:34:32AM -0800, Eric M Logan wrote: > Hi everyone. Is it normal to have "make kernel KERNCONF=something" > produce a smaller kernel than "config something, cd > ../../compile/something, make depend, make, make install"? And if so, > why is the former not the preferred way to compile a personalized > kernel? Thanks. > I think both ways should create identical kernelfiles. (Except when the second, older, method doesn't work.) And besides, the former (using KERNCONF) *is* the preferred way to compile a kernel. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 12: 4:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gibbon.kungfumonkey.com (dsl254-084-215.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.84.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3410B37B735; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:04:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jolly@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com) Received: from localhost (jolly@localhost) by gibbon.kungfumonkey.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16663; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:04:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:04:37 -0500 (EST) From: Jacob Frelinger To: Jeffrey Sewell Cc: , Subject: Re: Routing/2 Nic Help-please and thanks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Approved: by Your Mother's Brand Of Detergent X-Archive: No MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Jeffrey Sewell wrote: [snip] > * netstat -rn ********************************************************* > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif > Expire > default 161.184.32.1 UGSc 2 9 xl0 > 24.68.216/22 link#2 UC 0 0 xl1 => > 24.68.217.232 0:1:2:ec:27:ff UHLW 0 4 lo0 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this line is your problem. the address is on the loopback interface. now whats the cause or the fix, i've no idea, which is odd as later ifconfig shows it on the correct addapter. but its why you aren't getting responses from xl1 (if you're trying to ping from the same network as xl1), and the default route should have nothing to do with it. you may want to try manualy deleting that route and re-adding it on the correct interface as a temporary fix. (see man route) -- Jacob "I'm Brainy For Zombie Pops" Frelinger Resident Psycho http://www.thecoffinclub.com Jolly at TheCoffinClub dot Com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 12:40:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-63.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E9637B71C; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:40:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A17C466C4F; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:36:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:36:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mohacsi Janos Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is it necessary install kerberos in FreeBSD 4.2 and 4.3? Message-ID: <20010321123601.B5284@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mohacsi@ik.bme.hu on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 04:48:00PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 04:48:00PM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote: > Hi, > Probably I found a bug in the /stand/sysinstall. If I install > from floppies or CD and I select the minimal distribution set I get > components to be installed: > binary set > cryto set > kerberos 4=20 > kerberos 5 >=20 > I guess the minimal set is the binary and the crypto set. If I deselect > kerberos 4 and kerberos 5and install the disribution set, I got a > completly working minimal system. > If it is a feature, I can admit.=20 > However I upgrade our main freebsd systems from source and I never > install either kerberos 4 or kerberos 5. Kerberos is an optional part of the system. I don't know why the 'minimal distribution' would include it, can anyone else verify this? Kris --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6uRCxWry0BWjoQKURAnETAJ4xnVTOEmhcIMZbS4KQ0Z+4NOkB9gCeId3i Qs4igUvF7ZFxRZMUWwZsMOU= =2c3f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 12:54:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 469EB37B719 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:54:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 38353 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 20:45:26 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 20:45:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 692 invoked by uid 145); 21 Mar 2001 20:45:26 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 20:45:26 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:45:26 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Helge Oldach Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: <200103211955.UAA03416@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Helge Oldach wrote: > Jan Conrad: > >client: > >Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll > >fxp0 1500 00:02:b3:1f:f8:c5 1901001 0 771611 0 208240 > >server: > >Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll > >fxp0 1500 00:90:27:1c:f3:79 7157753 0 4648694 0 2661459 > > Gimme a break. Out of 4648694 output packets you see as many as 2661459 > collisions? That's more than 50%, i.e. for about every second packet > that you are sending you get a collision! You very clearly have a > collision problem. > > I bet that the switch is at full-duplex while you're at half. Try > changing the mediaopt setting of your NIC. That's funny, eh :-) ok - just collect some facts: - the switch is configured to 100baseTX, half-duplex: BayStack 450 24T (I am not the admin of that thing and have no access to the confs, but at least I know how the ports are configured, unfortunately there are no full/half duplex lights anymore on the newer Baystacks) - if I leave it at half-duplex the net makes 9Mb/s ping -f > Helge > ciao Jan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 13: 8:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flounder.jimking.net (flounder.jimking.net [209.205.176.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F4337B71F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:08:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim@jimking.net) Received: from jking (jking.lgc.com [134.132.76.82]) (authenticated) by flounder.jimking.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2LL5UO31488 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO); Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:05:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jim@jimking.net) Message-ID: <016201c0b24a$acb067e0$524c8486@jking> From: "Jim King" To: "Jan Conrad" Cc: References: Subject: Re: NFS performance Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:05:29 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just as a sanity check, have you run any other network performance tests? (ping -f doesn't count, imho.) I like netperf; it's in the ports collection. Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 13:16:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth.backplane.com [208.161.114.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD0B37B71D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:16:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2LL3h420596; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:03:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:03:43 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103212103.f2LL3h420596@earth.backplane.com> To: Jan Conrad Cc: Helge Oldach , , , , Subject: Re: NFS performance References: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :- if I leave it at half-duplex the net makes 9Mb/s : ping -f ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:16:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tim@weeble.org.uk) Received: from josep.demon.co.uk ([194.222.61.233] helo=doubtful.weeble.foo.uk) by finch-post-11.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14fpyI-000GPa-0B for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:16:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by doubtful.weeble.foo.uk (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2LLGjc04263 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:16:45 GMT (envelope-from tim@weeble.org.uk) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:16:45 +0000 (GMT) From: Tim Joseph X-X-Sender: To: Subject: ipf and ppp on FBSD 4.3-beta (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG No replies on freebsd-questions, so... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:50:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Tim Joseph To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ipf and ppp on FBSD 4.3-beta Hi, I originally installed FBSD 4.2-release, and setup ipf and ppp to run at boot. I recompiled the kernel with a default deny for ipfilter. The relevant bits of my kernel config, rc.conf and ppp.conf below: *kernel* ... options IPFILTER options IPFILTER_LOG options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK ... *rc.conf* ... ipfilter_enable="YES" ipfilter_program="/sbin/ipf -Fa -f" ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf.rules" ... ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="NO" ppp_profile="myisp" ... *ppp.conf* ... default: ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) set device /dev/cuaa0 set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command set speed 115200 set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \ \"\" AT OK-AT-OK ATE1Q0 OK \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 set timeout 120 add default HISADDR # enable dns ... myisp: set phone XXXXXXXXXXXX # set login set authname XXXXXXXXXXXX set authkey XXXXXXXXXXXX set ifaddr AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD 111.222.333.444 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 Where AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD is my fixed ip, and 111.222.333.444 is the ISP's ip. The ipf rules are a bit long to stick them all here, but suffice to say that the bits relevant to my dial-up connection look like this: ... block in log body on tun0 all head 100 block out log body on tun0 all head 150 ... pass out quick proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S/SA keep state keep frags group 150 ... That sort of thing. It's a rule set I've used without hitch on OpenBSD 2.8-stable and on FreeBSD 4.2-release. But on my current version of 4.3-beta (cvsup-ed sometime around 17 March) all packets headed out (and also in) to the tun0 interface ran through the ipf rules with out any matches and then hit the default deny in the kernel. Strange. I assumed I had done something, so I tinkered (cvsup-ing and recompiling and tweaking configs) but got nowhere. I happened to drop to single user mode and then back to multiuser, which of course brought up ipf and ppp - all worked fine! I thought it was solved, but on my next reboot, the same problem ocurred. I went back to single user and back to multi-user, and hey presto it worked! I repeated this 3 or 4 times. I then rebooted and tried "ipf -y" and bingo, packets were matching the rules and were being passed correctly! What has changed since 4.2-release that I need to flush the interface list like this to get things to work? I could put this in a startup script, but I'd like to know why this is now seems to be needed. Thanks. From, Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 13:19: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6390A37B71A; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:18:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2LLA5015089; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:10:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: mohacsi@ik.bme.hu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it necessary install kerberos in FreeBSD 4.2 and 4.3? In-Reply-To: <20010321123601.B5284@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010321123601.B5284@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010321131005M.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:10:05 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It's certainly not included in -stable. The only "default crypto" is crypto-bin. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 13:20:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gw-nl1.origin-it.com (gw-nl1.origin-it.com [193.79.128.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B142C37B76B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:20:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com) Received: from mail.de.origin-it.com (localhost.origin-it.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl1.origin-it.com with ESMTP id WAA26015; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:20:05 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com) Received: from smtprelay-de1.origin-it.com(172.16.188.53) by gw-nl1.origin-it.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma026013; Wed, 21 Mar 01 22:20:05 +0100 Received: from mailhub.de.origin-it.com (mailhub.de.origin-it.com [172.16.189.20]) by mail.de.origin-it.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id WAA11699; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:20:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (galaxy.de.cp.philips.com [130.143.166.29]) by mailhub.de.origin-it.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/hmo23oct00) with ESMTP id f2LLK2Z05710; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:20:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/hmo14aug98) id WAA03934; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:20:01 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200103212120.WAA03934@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: from Jan Conrad at "Mar 21, 2001 9:45:26 pm" To: conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de (Jan Conrad) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:20:01 +0100 (MET) Cc: bright@wintelcom.net, dillon@earth.backplane.com, gordont@bluemtn.net, rdm@cfcl.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Helge Oldach X-Address: Atos Origin GmbH, Billstrasse 80, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany X-Phone: +49 40 7886 464, Fax: +49 40 7886 235, Mobile: +49 160 4782517 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jan Conrad: >> >client: >> >Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll >> >fxp0 1500 00:02:b3:1f:f8:c5 1901001 0 771611 0 208240 >> >server: >> >Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll >> >fxp0 1500 00:90:27:1c:f3:79 7157753 0 4648694 0 2661459 >> >> Gimme a break. Out of 4648694 output packets you see as many as 2661459 >> collisions? That's more than 50%, i.e. for about every second packet >> that you are sending you get a collision! You very clearly have a >> collision problem. >> >> I bet that the switch is at full-duplex while you're at half. Try >> changing the mediaopt setting of your NIC. >- if I leave it at half-duplex the net makes 9Mb/s > ping -f - if I switch the fxp0 interface to full duplex > and boot the machine and disconnect the net for some seconds > the net slows down to 200kb/s Ooops! >I would conclude that the switch is on 100baseTX, half-duplex, indeed. Yep, most certainly it is. And it's even too stupid to see that you are different. But OK. >again, running on half-duplex, transfering 100Mb from a client to this >machine (merlin) >on client: >mount -t nfs -o intr,nfsv3,-r=32768,-w=32768 merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt >dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/zero bs=16k count=64x100 >104857600 bytes transferred in 12.765062 secs (8214422 bytes/sec) Decent. > input (fxp0) output > packets errs bytes packets errs bytes colls > 11 0 668 11 0 412 0 > 6 0 1670 5 0 1556 0 > 8 0 180 7 0 0 0 > 11 0 5155696 8 0 62530 0 > 254 0 7015588 23 0 98848 32 > 6115 0 7926312 540 0 118592 1189 > 5304 0 9183810 548 0 136772 1030 > 5768 0 8091074 586 0 120418 1139 > 6527 0 9191418 674 0 138720 1337 > 5915 0 8728739 612 0 129630 1176 > 6492 0 9032044 678 0 133856 1243 > 6195 0 8112222 634 0 122300 1237 > 6509 0 9251329 674 0 137258 1287 > 5886 0 8317303 605 0 125380 1138 > 6490 0 8904250 665 0 132046 1334 > 5978 0 8857169 617 0 139924 1149 > 6444 0 853656 676 0 23624 1259 > 4720 0 313 564 0 0 903 > 1 0 1349 1 0 1390 0 > 2 0 171 0 0 90 0 Well, the volume is on the input side here. The figures say that for any output packet your NIC needs on average about two attempts to get it to the wire. This is almost OK as this is the response channel, and in relation to the overall load of the link (input plus output) the collision rate is not outrageous. Say, some 13%, but for a saturated half-duplex port this is what one would expect. Bear in mind that the numbers you gave us before (top of mail) give a different picture: input and output were not *that* much different, yielding in a much higher overall collision rate. Anyhow. This clearly shows that the slowliness has nothing to do with the network which is just perfect. But you certainly would want to talk to the switch admin to change the port to full-duplex. This is a definitive barrier here and changing that will give you noticeable extra performance. Frankly, forcing a switch that can do full-duplex to half-duplex is plain nonsense as it doesn't really exploit the hardware capabilities. If you've got surplus money, better spend it elsewhere than buying unused capabilities. >Has anybody ever seen something like that ? In networking, you'll see all sorts of strange counters, dubious claims, obscure side-effects, and marvellous breakages. Basically you learn to trust your own eyes and fingers only. :-) Helge To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 13:41: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from web13204.mail.yahoo.com (web13204.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5424A37B71A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:41:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lipshitz909@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010321160143.26738.qmail@web13204.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.167.135.253] by web13204.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:01:43 PST Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:01:43 -0800 (PST) From: Larry Librettez Subject: Cannot su to root in X terminal with 4.3-BETA To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After upgrading to 4.3-BETA, I find I cannot su to root in a terminal window (rxvt, xterm) in X (XFree86-3.3.6 with either GNOME or KDE). Even if I enter the correct password, the su login gets rejected (and yes, user is member of wheel group). The logs report `BAD SU LIPSHITZ to root on ttyp0`. However, in a plain terminal (not in X), I CAN su to root as a regular user. Prior to upgrading to 4.3-BETA (kernel + userland), I was able to su to root in X in 4.2-STABLE. I tried adding `secureī after the ttyp entries in /etc/ttys but that didnīt help. I did both mergemaster and MAKEDEV all during my rebuild. I specifically re-made the ttyp* devices. I even typed out the su password on the terminal to make sure it shows correctly and it does. On a separate box using 4.2-STABLE I upgraded only the kernel to 4.3-BETA (same 4.2-STABLE userland), and the problem still occurred - couldnīt su to root in an X terminal. Is the problem in the kernel? A bug? A DoS? I cvsupīd 3 times and rebuilded 3 times with no change in this problem. How do I fix this? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 14: 3:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FDA37B71F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:03:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2LM2qs84369; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:03:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103212203.f2LM2qs84369@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: Ian Vaudrey Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:11:41 GMT." <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E24366C@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:02:52 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >That may possibly explain the trouble Valentin Nechayev is experiencing, but >Brett G Lemoine is using Seagate drives while I am using a Quantum unit and >we are seeing something that appears to be very similar. Jordan Hubbard also >reported what seems to be the same problem occurring with Quantum drives. Do >you have any idea why we are seeing these problems? The only common factor >at first glance is a recent revision of the ahc driver. > >Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help pin this down. > >References: >http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable%40freebsd.org/msg26369.html This report does not use the latest driver. >http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable%40freebsd.org/msg26152.html Nor does this. >http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable%40freebsd.org/msg25870.html Nor does this. > - Ian This all looks like the issue that was resolved on 3/19/2001 in -current with rev 1.114 of the sequencer. This change was MFCed on 3/19/2000 as revision 1.94.2.12 of aic7xxx.seq. If you are still having problems with top of the tree in -stable, please let me know. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 14: 8:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A343F37B719 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:08:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zer0byte@linuxfreemail.com) Received: from linuxfreemail.com (pool0295.cvx11-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.178.189.40]) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04715 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:08:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3AB924B8.2A7C512D@linuxfreemail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:01:28 -0800 From: zer0byte X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG freebsd-stable@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 14:19:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B95437B71D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:19:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id OAA18399; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:18:27 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda18393; Wed Mar 21 14:18:12 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f2LMI6O43398; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdc43368; Wed Mar 21 14:17:25 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.3/8.9.1) id f2LMHN409655; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:17:23 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103212217.f2LMHN409655@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdmq9648; Wed Mar 21 14:16:41 2001 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-Sender: schubert To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Jan Conrad , Matt Dillon , Gordon Tetlow , Rich Morin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS performance In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:39:06 PST." <20010321093906.E12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:16:41 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010321093906.E12319@fw.wintelcom.net>, Alfred Perlstein writes: > * Jan Conrad [010321 09:27] wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > > Do you know what actually determines the writing speed in a case like > > > > our's? Network or disk? > > > > > > Y'know, it would be a hell of a lot easier to figure out what was > > > wrong if you showed us the mount flags you're using. > > > > client: einstein > > server: merlin > > > > client: > > mount_nfs merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt > > > > 'mount' gives: > > merlin:/freebsd/misc on /mnt (nfs) > > Oh come on now, you didn't do a single thing that I asked you to! > > Did you bother to read the mount_nfs manpage? > > *slap* > > try this: > > mount -t nfs \ > -o nfsv3,tcp,intr,rdirplus,-r=32768,-w=32768 \ > merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt It would be nice to see our amd support "rdirplus". However, amd 6.0.5 does. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 14:35:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from giroc.albury.net.au (giroc.albury.NET.AU [203.15.244.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718FF37B71A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:35:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nicks@giroc.albury.net.au) Received: (from nicks@localhost) by giroc.albury.net.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2LMZfR28325; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:35:41 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:35:41 +1100 From: Nick Slager To: Dinesh Nair Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: booting diskless on 4.3 Message-ID: <20010322093541.A27823@albury.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from dinesh@worldcare.com.my on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 03:47:00PM +0800 X-Homer: Whoohooooooo! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Dinesh Nair (dinesh@worldcare.com.my): > are there any howtos or documents on configuring fbsd 4.3 as a boot server > thru dhcp and pxe and having another box boot diskless off this one ? There's client and server info at http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/pxe/ Nick -- Nick Slager | Quidquid latine dictum nicks@albury.net | sit, altum viditur. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 15:12:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ctonet.it (mail.ctonet.it [212.110.160.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E4D37B718 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:12:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olgeni@uli.it) Received: from olgeni.localdomain.net (ppp-158.dial3.ctonet.it [212.110.178.158]) by mail.ctonet.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EC8CF3B1; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:12:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olgeni.localdomain.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2LNDjK22573; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:13:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olgeni@uli.it) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:13:45 +0100 (CET) From: Jimmy Olgeni X-X-Sender: To: Gordon Tetlow Cc: Subject: Re: kernel panic on 4-stable (filesystem related) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > I was sorting a large file with "sort" and ran out of space on / > > (filled up /tmp). > > Were you doing this as root? What's the reserved percentage on / ? I was doing it as a ordinary user, with 2 parallel processes (2 sorts). minfree is set to 8%. I was not able to reproduce the problem on the same box... everything looked fine since then. -- jimmy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 15:38: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from terra.talksport.net (terra.talksport.net [195.52.75.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3265837B71E for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:38:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from IVaudrey@talksport.co.uk) Received: from hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk [172.16.2.6]) by terra.talksport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A368825D0D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:38:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hfxchng01.talksport.co.uk (unverified) by hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:37:47 +0000 Received: by hfexchange.talksport.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1ZN5NVYJ>; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:37:46 -0000 Message-ID: <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E24366D@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> From: Ian Vaudrey To: "'Justin T. Gibbs'" Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: RE: ahc - Invalidating pack Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:37:37 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Many thanks for the response. I last ran cvsup and built & installed world and kernel on this machine yesterday (March 20th), but unfortunately the problem is still occurring. aic7xxx.seq is at revision v 1.94.2.12 (2001/03/19 15:09:26). I am certainly not ruling out a hardware problem as the cause of this, but the controller, drive, cabling and terminator are all new and the subsystem passes every diagnostic I have access to. I've been considering reverting to 4.2-RELEASE to see if the problem goes away. Would that be a useful thing to try? Please do not hesitate to let me know if you need any more information. - Ian >-----Original Message----- >From: Justin T. Gibbs [mailto:gibbs@scsiguy.com] >Sent: 21 March 2001 22:03 >To: Ian Vaudrey >Cc: 'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org' >Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack > > >>That may possibly explain the trouble Valentin Nechayev is >>experiencing, but Brett G Lemoine is using Seagate drives >>while I am using a Quantum unit and we are seeing something >>that appears to be very similar. Jordan Hubbard also >>reported what seems to be the same problem occurring with >>Quantum drives. Do you have any idea why we are seeing these >>problems? The only common factor at first glance is a recent >>revision of the ahc driver. >> >>Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help pin >>this down. >> >>References: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable%40freebsd.org/msg26369.html > >This report does not use the latest driver. > >>http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable%40freebsd.org/msg26152.html > >Nor does this. > >>http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable%40freebsd.org/msg25870.html > >Nor does this. > >> - Ian > >This all looks like the issue that was resolved on 3/19/2001 in >-current with rev 1.114 of the sequencer. This change was >MFCed on 3/19/2000 as revision 1.94.2.12 of aic7xxx.seq. > >If you are still having problems with top of the tree in -stable, >please let me know. > >-- >Justin > ************************************************** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify postmaster@thewirelessgroup.net immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of The Wireless Group. ************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 15:42:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7138637B719 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:42:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA75076; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:41:54 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02487; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:41:52 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200103212341.KAA02487@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ARCH in /etc/make.conf In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:35:45 +0300. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:41:52 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > use gzip and/or bzip2 over a large text and binary files ~10 times > use lame (mp3 encoder) on some .wav files > use mpg123 with decompression to disk on some .mp3 files. Try running gzip/gunzip/mpg123/etc with output to /dev/null to cut out a bunch of filesystem effects. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 15:50:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from agena.meridian-enviro.com (thunder.meridian-enviro.com [207.109.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D7537B71D; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:50:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Received: from delta.meridian-enviro.com (delta.meridian-enviro.com [10.10.10.43]) by agena.meridian-enviro.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2LNodQ49070; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:50:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:50:39 -0600 Message-ID: <87u24m7kc0.wl@delta.meridian-enviro.com> From: rand@meridian-enviro.com To: Mike Smith Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Tancsa , bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-Reply-To: <200103210258.f2L2wGO00829@mass.dis.org> References: <87g0gb55ef.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <200103210258.f2L2wGO00829@mass.dis.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: $L%T~#'9fAQ])o]A][d7EH`V;"_;2K;TEPQB=v]rDf_2s% If you can add another function like twe_printstate that invokes Mike> twe_print_request on each of the requests on the busy queue and Mike> let me know what they look like, that might give me some clues. OK, I haven't written the twe_printstate function yet, but I think I have the request. I got the filesystem wedged first, and then browsing the datastructures with DDB, I think I've found the busy queue. Here's the request: db> call twe_print_request(0xc1529800) twe0: CMD: request_id 89 opcode size 7 unit 0 host_id 0 twe0: status 0 flags 0x0 count 16 sgl_offset 3 twe0: lba 264703 twe0: 0: 0xce4f000/4096 twe0: 1: 0x2ab0000/4096 twe0: tr_command 0xc1529800/0x1749d800 tr_data 0xcb928000/0xce4f000,8192 twe0: tr_status 2 tr_flags 0x1 tr_complete 0xc011f170 tr_private 0 I'm rebuilding the kernel now with the function twe_printstate, after I figured it out with the debugger. (This reminds me of a saying that has to do with horses and carriages, hmm.) Oh, btw, it took over 3 million rows to get it stuck this time. Gotta love a test cycle of 6 hours or so. Sigh. I also paniced the kernel from DDB, so I have a core file too. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 16: 1: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E5037B71C for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:01:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2M00ks86172; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:00:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103220000.f2M00ks86172@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: Ian Vaudrey Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:37:37 GMT." <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E24366D@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:00:46 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Many thanks for the response. > >I last ran cvsup and built & installed world and kernel on this machine >yesterday (March 20th), but unfortunately the problem is still occurring. >aic7xxx.seq is at revision v 1.94.2.12 (2001/03/19 15:09:26). Can you provide driver diagnostic messages from this updated kernel? I'll need controller and device info too. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 16:17:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from terra.talksport.net (terra.talksport.net [195.52.75.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E8F37B71E for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:16:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from IVaudrey@talksport.co.uk) Received: from hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk [172.16.2.6]) by terra.talksport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9F825D0D for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:17:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hfxchng01.talksport.co.uk (unverified) by hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:16:57 +0000 Received: by hfexchange.talksport.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1ZN5NVZS>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:16:56 -0000 Message-ID: <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E24366E@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> From: Ian Vaudrey To: "'Justin T. Gibbs'" Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: RE: ahc - Invalidating pack Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:16:52 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Here is the current output from dmesg, let me know if this is not enough. Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: Tue Mar 20 11:13:52 GMT 2001 root@mars.talksport.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (501.14-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 134152192 (131008K bytes) avail memory = 126230528 (123272K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc044c000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib2: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib2 pci1: at 0.0 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xa000-0xa00f at device 7.1 on pci0 uhci0: port 0xa400-0xa41f irq 15 at device 7.2 on pc i0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered fxp0: port 0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xec000000-0xec0f ffff,0xec101000-0xec101fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:9d:94:e2 ahc0: port 0xac00-0xacff mem 0xec100000-0 xec100fff irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci0 aic7892: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs pci0: (vendor=0x125d, dev=0x1969) at 11.0 irq 14 pcib1: on motherboard pci2: on pcib1 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabl ed da0: 8759MB (17938985 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1116C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray c losed (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x27 - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0xf8 STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0xf8 SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0x1220000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0xdc1000 : Length 4096 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x1a - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x119 STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x119 SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0x113e000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0x101f000 : Length 4096 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x23 - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x119 STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x119 SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0xf1f000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0x10c0000 : Length 2048 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0xa - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x14a STACK == 0x67, 0x164, 0x0, 0xe4 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x14a SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0x11de000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0x10bf000 : Length 4096 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x2f - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x149 STACK == 0x67, 0x164, 0x0, 0xe4 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x149 SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0x16ef000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0xc10000 : Length 2048 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x1d - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x16d STACK == 0x67, 0x164, 0x0, 0x35 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x16d SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0x7ba000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0x63b000 : Length 4096 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x20 - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x11a STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x11a SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0x12c0000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0xf81000 : Length 4096 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0xd - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x119 STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x119 SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0x10fe000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0xfbf000 : Length 4096 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x4c - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0xe4 STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0xe4 SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0xf5f000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0x1080000 : Length 2048 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): BDR message in message buffer (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x4c - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x117 STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x117 SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 80 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 Card NEXTQSCB = 68 QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 20 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 11:32 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 67 2 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 44 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 sg[0] - Addr 0xf5f000 : Length 4096 sg[1] - Addr 0x1080000 : Length 2048 (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34b ahc0: Issued Channel A Bus Reset. 64 SCBs aborted - Ian >-----Original Message----- >From: Justin T. Gibbs [mailto:gibbs@scsiguy.com] >Sent: 22 March 2001 00:01 >To: Ian Vaudrey >Cc: 'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org' >Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack > >Can you provide driver diagnostic messages from this updated kernel? >I'll need controller and device info too. > >-- >Justin > ************************************************** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify postmaster@thewirelessgroup.net immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of The Wireless Group. ************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 16:37: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745D837B720 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:37:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2M0b1s86768; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:37:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103220037.f2M0b1s86768@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: Ian Vaudrey Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:16:52 GMT." <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E24366E@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:37:01 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Here is the current output from dmesg, let me know if this is not enough. This looks like the bug I MFCed a fix for this morning. Please CVSup again and resend output if the problem persists. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 17:46:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from agena.meridian-enviro.com (thunder.meridian-enviro.com [207.109.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1986937B719; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:46:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Received: from localhost.meridian-enviro.com (kfarms.meridian-enviro.com [10.10.10.20]) by agena.meridian-enviro.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2M1kVQ60354; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:46:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:46:30 -0600 Message-ID: <87bsqu60eh.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> From: rand@meridian-enviro.com To: Mike Smith Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Tancsa , bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-Reply-To: <200103220121.f2M1KwE00867@mass.dis.org> References: <87u24m7kc0.wl@delta.meridian-enviro.com> <200103220121.f2M1KwE00867@mass.dis.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: $L%T~#'9fAQ])o]A][d7EH`V;"_;2K;TEPQB=v]rDf_2s% If you can add another function like twe_printstate that invokes Mike> twe_print_request on each of the requests on the busy queue and Mike> let me know what they look like, that might give me some clues. Doug> OK, I haven't written the twe_printstate function yet, but I Doug> think I have the request. I got the filesystem wedged first, and Doug> then browsing the datastructures with DDB, I think I've found Doug> the busy queue. Here's the request: Mike> Cool, this works just as well. 8) Doug> db> call twe_print_request(0xc1529800) Doug> twe0: CMD: request_id 89 opcode size 7 unit 0 host_id 0 Doug> twe0: status 0 flags 0x0 count 16 sgl_offset 3 Doug> twe0: lba 264703 Doug> twe0: 0: 0xce4f000/4096 Doug> twe0: 1: 0x2ab0000/4096 Doug> twe0: tr_command 0xc1529800/0x1749d800 tr_data 0xcb928000/0xce4f000,8192 Doug> twe0: tr_status 2 tr_flags 0x1 tr_complete 0xc011f170 tr_private 0 Mike> Er. This is bad; tr_status == 2 means that the command has been Mike> completed; it shouldn't still be on the busy queue. Can you Mike> check to make sure you have the right queue here? I am not at all positive I've got the right queue. I *think* I do. I'm trying to break it again now, and I'll use the code below to verify the queue. I'm also going to hit the kernel core with gdb to see if I can verify that. Doug> I'm rebuilding the kernel now with the function twe_printstate, Doug> after I figured it out with the debugger. (This reminds me of a Doug> saying that has to do with horses and carriages, hmm.) Mike> Hrm. It *should* be pretty easy; I'm sorry I confused you with Mike> the 'printstate' reference; you should be able to fix up Mike> twe_report to just dump the busy queue: Mike> struct twe_request *tr; Mike> ... Mike> TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, TAILQ_FIRST(sc->twe_busy), tr_link) Mike> twe_print_request(tr); This doesn't compile for me. Every time I try to use 'sc->twe_busy' I get a syntax error: invalid type argument of `->' Here is what I'm using right now: s = splbio(); for (i = 0; (sc = devclass_get_softc(twe_devclass, i)) != NULL; i++) { twe_print_controller(sc); printf("ready queue: %d entries\n", sc->twe_qstat[TWEQ_READY].q_length); TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, sc->twe_ready, tr_link) twe_print_request(tr); printf("busy queue: %d entries\n", sc->twe_qstat[TWEQ_BUSY].q_length); TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, sc->twe_busy, tr_link) twe_print_request(tr); printf("complete queue: %d entries\n", sc->twe_qstat[TWEQ_COMPLETE].q_length); TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, sc->twe_complete, tr_link) twe_print_request(tr); } splx(s); This compiles, and when I run it it doesn't crash! :) In fact, it says all the queues are empty. Doug> Oh, btw, it took over 3 million rows to get it stuck this Doug> time. Gotta love a test cycle of 6 hours or so. Sigh. Mike> This is obviously a really weird case; possibly either an Mike> extremely narrow race, or some very borderline PCI issue. One Mike> question I should have asked, but don't recall whether you Mike> answered; are you using an AMD K7 system by any chance? We've Mike> seen some *very* weird behaviour with these controllers in some Mike> K7 systems. Yes, it *is* really weird. I can only get it to break with MySQL. From a suggestion of Mike Tancsa, I tried lots of concurrent bonnies, and also running a buildworld with a high -j value. I let both run for about 12 hours each, with no failure. The only thing that'll kill it is MySQL. I'm confused. :( Nope. Its a SuperMicro P6DBU, with dual 400MHz CPUs. Mike> Thanks again for your help here. My pleasure. (Calling what we are doing 'help' is complementary. If this is help, what you are doing for us must be close to divine intervention! :)) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 17:51:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zircon.seattle.wa.us (sense-sea-CovadSub-0-228.oz.net [216.39.147.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15D1837B71B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:51:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: (qmail 479 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Mar 2001 01:51:39 -0000 From: Joe Kelsey MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15033.23211.276231.469648@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:51:39 -0800 To: John Merryweather Cooper Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 In-Reply-To: <3AB83093.73CB14A8@webmail.bmi.net> References: <3AB83093.73CB14A8@webmail.bmi.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Merryweather Cooper writes: > After installing XFree86-4.03 (XFree86-4.02 had worked just fine), > I found myself with a mouse that would not function under X. The > pointer would appear, but it would be pinned at the top-most scan line > of the monitor--able to move laterally, but not vertically. > > The mouse in question is a Logitech MouseMan+ WheelMouse. Under 4.02, > it had worked just fine. It was attached to a PS/2 mouse port. It was > setup in sysinstall for "Auto" and PS/2 port with no other switches. > > I was curious what moused thought of the mouse. When I ran moused -p > /dev/sysmouse -i all, I was unpleasantly surprised to see it identified > as: > > /dev/sysmouse sysmouse sysmouse generic Of course it will tell you that. /dev/sysmouse is *created* by moused! In order to test the mouse, you would have to run it using the *real* port of /dev/psm0. 4.02 of X *broke* the mouse, so I kind of doubt that your were actually running 4.02. Or maybe sometime in the last month the port changed? I know that when I upgraded from 4.01 to 4.02 the mouse stuff broke completely. What were you using in your X config file? There is no way to diagnose your problem without that information. /Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 17:56:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C69637B71D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:56:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 14fuL7-0004yJ-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:56:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:56:36 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Message-ID: <20010321205636.A15816@pir.net> Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List References: <3AB83093.73CB14A8@webmail.bmi.net> <15033.23211.276231.469648@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15033.23211.276231.469648@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us>; from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:51:39PM -0800 X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Joe Kelsey probably said: > 4.02 of X *broke* the mouse, so I kind of doubt that your were actually > running 4.02. Or maybe sometime in the last month the port changed? I > know that when I upgraded from 4.01 to 4.02 the mouse stuff broke > completely. 4.0.2 is more fussy about mice, but I'm using it perfectly well with moused and ps/2 and USB mice so it isn't completely broken. For moused I found I had to use; Identifier "Mouse1" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "Auto" Option "Device" "/dev/mouse" P. -- pir pir@pir.net pir@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 18: 0:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from agena.meridian-enviro.com (thunder.meridian-enviro.com [207.109.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8C137B718; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:00:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Received: from localhost.meridian-enviro.com (kfarms.meridian-enviro.com [10.10.10.20]) by agena.meridian-enviro.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2M204Q61707; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:00:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:00:03 -0600 Message-ID: <87ae6e5zrw.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> From: rand@meridian-enviro.com To: Mike Smith Cc: rand@meridian-enviro.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Tancsa , bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-Reply-To: <200103220153.f2M1r0E01209@mass.dis.org> References: <87bsqu60eh.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> <200103220153.f2M1r0E01209@mass.dis.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: $L%T~#'9fAQ])o]A][d7EH`V;"_;2K;TEPQB=v]rDf_2s% Sorry, the above code is totally bogus; I'm kinda delirious Mike> (feverish) right now. Mike> Try Mike> TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, &sc->twe_busy, tr_link) Yup, that is what I half figured out half guessed at. (Helps to have other code to look through!) Mike> [...] there's a pattern of some sort involved, we just don't Mike> know what it is yet... I do! (outside air temp / inside air temp) * day of the month % line voltage + wc -l /etc/motd - df -k /var/db/mysql Oh, no. Thats my IQ. :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 18:17:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5A837B71B; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:17:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f2M2HQS44551; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:17:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.2/8.11.2av) with ESMTP id f2M2HLS44542; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:17:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010321211204.0308d800@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:17:20 -0500 To: Mike Smith , rand@meridian-enviro.com From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: 3ware problems Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, bryanh@meridian-enviro.com In-Reply-To: <200103220121.f2M1KwE00867@mass.dis.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 05:20 PM 3/21/2001 -0800, Mike Smith wrote: >This is obviously a really weird case; possibly either an extremely >narrow race, or some very borderline PCI issue. One question I should >have asked, but don't recall whether you answered; are you using an AMD >K7 system by any chance? We've seen some *very* weird behaviour with >these controllers in some K7 systems. Just a shot in the dark, but could be something to do with the hard drives themselves ? Are these not the same units that people have been having problems with across the board on various OSes and IDE controllers ? e.g. see the thread Subject: Re: 2GB limit on gzip? on questions@freebsd.org. Different issue, but same model of drives (4 IBM 75GB DTLA) I have been using only Quantum IDEs on all my boxes save for a few 40 gig Maxtors on part of my news spool. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administration, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 18:24:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from agena.meridian-enviro.com (thunder.meridian-enviro.com [207.109.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B15F37B71E; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:24:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Received: from localhost.meridian-enviro.com (kfarms.meridian-enviro.com [10.10.10.20]) by agena.meridian-enviro.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2M2O2Q63800; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:24:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:24:01 -0600 Message-ID: <878zly5yny.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> From: rand@meridian-enviro.com To: Mike Smith Cc: rand@meridian-enviro.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Tancsa , bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-Reply-To: <200103220121.f2M1KwE00867@mass.dis.org> References: <87u24m7kc0.wl@delta.meridian-enviro.com> <200103220121.f2M1KwE00867@mass.dis.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: $L%T~#'9fAQ])o]A][d7EH`V;"_;2K;TEPQB=v]rDf_2s% Er. This is bad; tr_status == 2 means that the command has been Mike> completed; it shouldn't still be on the busy queue. Can you Mike> check to make sure you have the right queue here? Well, it looks like I had the wrong queue before. Blush. At least this time tr_status is 1. Not sure if that is good or bad though! :) Here is the debug output: db> call twe_printqueues twe0: status 57007310 twe0: current max twe0: free 0099 0100 twe0: ready 0000 0000 twe0: busy 0001 0100 twe0: complete 0000 0009 twe0: bioq 0000 0021 twe0: AEN queue head 1 tail 0 ready queue: 0 entries busy queue: 1 entries twe0: CMD: request_id 54 opcode size 11 unit 0 host_id 0 twe0: status 0 flags 0x0 count 32 sgl_offset 3 twe0: lba 177770466 twe0: 0: 0xffc4000/4096 twe0: 1: 0x11f85000/4096 twe0: 2: 0x12d66000/4096 twe0: 3: 0x10e87000/4096 twe0: tr_command 0xc1520400/0x174f4400 tr_data 0xce0f4000/0xffc4000,16384 twe0: tr_status 1 tr_flags 0x2 tr_complete 0xc011f1b0 tr_private 0xc9260400 complete queue: 0 entries This was generated with the code: void twe_printqueues(void) { struct twe_softc *sc; struct twe_request *tr = NULL; int i, s; s = splbio(); for (i = 0; (sc = devclass_get_softc(twe_devclass, i)) != NULL; i++) { twe_print_controller(sc); printf("ready queue: %d entries\n", sc->twe_qstat[TWEQ_READY].q_length); TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, sc->twe_ready, tr_link) twe_print_request(tr); printf("busy queue: %d entries\n", sc->twe_qstat[TWEQ_BUSY].q_length); TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, sc->twe_busy, tr_link) twe_print_request(tr); printf("complete queue: %d entries\n", sc->twe_qstat[TWEQ_COMPLETE].q_length); TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, sc->twe_complete, tr_link) twe_print_request(tr); } splx(s); } To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 18:33:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A5037B71A; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:33:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2M2XXI00216; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:33:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:33:32 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: stable@freebsd.org, developers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 RELEASE schedule Message-ID: <20010321183332.A152@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <41733.982737912@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <41733.982737912@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:45:12PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:45:12PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > March 20: FreeBSD 4.3-RC (RELEASE CANDIDATE) Jordan, I assume we are now offically in RC mode? And as such this now applies? > I will also categorically state, however, that when I release the RC > this time it will be a definite *RELEASE CANDIDATE*. This means that > nothing but the most critical last-minute release bogons will be fixed > between RC and -release. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 18:54:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AAB37B71F; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:54:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2M2sF044228; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:54:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com, stable@freebsd.org, developers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 RELEASE schedule In-Reply-To: <20010321183332.A152@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <41733.982737912@winston.osd.bsdi.com> <20010321183332.A152@dragon.nuxi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010321185415B.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:54:15 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 13 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I assume we are now offically in RC mode? And as such this now applies? > > > I will also categorically state, however, that when I release the RC > > this time it will be a definite *RELEASE CANDIDATE*. This means that > > nothing but the most critical last-minute release bogons will be fixed > > between RC and -release. Close. All that will apply just as soon as I release the first RC, something which is still a few days off but I figured we should start slowing down and preparing for it now. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 19:21:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp3.knology.net (user-24-214-63-13.knology.net [24.214.63.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB6DD37B71D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:21:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from n4cnw@knology.net) Received: (qmail 7809 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2001 03:21:01 -0000 Received: from user-24-214-88-186.knology.net (HELO n4cnw.dyndns.org) (24.214.88.186) by user-24-214-63-13.knology.net with SMTP; 22 Mar 2001 03:21:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mike Murphree To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Fujitsu M2513A MO drive problem? Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:21:01 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: gibbs@scsiguy.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01032121210100.00489@n4cnw.dyndns.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What ever happened with the guy that reported this a few days ago? I hadn't seen problems on my Symbios 53C875 controller until I rebuilt yesterday and I seem to have it now too. I rebuilt again tonight and it hasn't changed.... sym0: <875> port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 0xdf141000-0xdf141fff,0xdf142000-0xdf1420ff irq 11 at device 11.0 on pci0 sym0: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking sym0: open drain IRQ line driver, using on-chip SRAM sym0: using LOAD/STORE-based firmware. sym0: SCAN FOR LUNS disabled for targets 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15. *and* da0 at sym0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-CCS device da0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 10) da0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Logical unit not ready, cause n *and* FreeBSD n4cnw.dyndns.org 4.3-RC FreeBSD 4.3-RC #1: Wed Mar 21 20:25:55 CST 2001 A MSDOS formatted cartridge is in the drive. Thanks, Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 19:23:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zircon.seattle.wa.us (sense-sea-CovadSub-0-228.oz.net [216.39.147.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C74D937B719 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:23:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: (qmail 736 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Mar 2001 03:23:34 -0000 From: Joe Kelsey MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15033.28725.996068.290412@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:23:33 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 In-Reply-To: <20010321205636.A15816@pir.net> References: <3AB83093.73CB14A8@webmail.bmi.net> <15033.23211.276231.469648@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> <20010321205636.A15816@pir.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Radcliffe writes: > Joe Kelsey probably said: > > 4.02 of X *broke* the mouse, so I kind of doubt that your were actually > > running 4.02. Or maybe sometime in the last month the port changed? I > > know that when I upgraded from 4.01 to 4.02 the mouse stuff broke > > completely. > > 4.0.2 is more fussy about mice, but I'm using it perfectly well with > moused and ps/2 and USB mice so it isn't completely broken. > > For moused I found I had to use; > > Identifier "Mouse1" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "Auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/mouse" The important line there is setting Protocol to Auto. If you try to follow the various FAQs, they recommend(ed) using Sysmouse, which causes X to misbehave with moused. Just for the sake of completeness, if you are, in fact, using moused, the correct device is /dev/sysmouse, but /dev/mouse is really just a symlink to it. /Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 19:30:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E5737B722 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:30:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA25428; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:00:09 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15033.28725.996068.290412@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:00:08 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Joe Kelsey Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 22-Mar-01 Joe Kelsey wrote: > The important line there is setting Protocol to Auto. If you try to > follow the various FAQs, they recommend(ed) using Sysmouse, which causes > X to misbehave with moused. Just for the sake of completeness, if you > are, in fact, using moused, the correct device is /dev/sysmouse, but > /dev/mouse is really just a symlink to it. I found this.. Axis movement generating button events :) Does anyone have a wheel mouse which works with X403? I have a Logitech MouseMan+ and I had it going under X3 with 'Buttons 6' but it doesn't work under X4 :( --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 19:34:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lerami.lerctr.org (lerami.lerctr.org [207.158.72.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A51C37B71F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:34:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: (from ler@localhost) by lerami.lerctr.org (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5/20010318/$Revision: 1.16 $) id f2M3YM59016724; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:34:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ler) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:34:22 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman To: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: Joe Kelsey , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Message-ID: <20010321213422.B16145@lerami.lerctr.org> References: <15033.28725.996068.290412@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i In-Reply-To: ; from doconnor@gsoft.com.au on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:00:08PM +1030 X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Daniel O'Connor [010321 21:30]: > I found this.. Axis movement generating button events :) :-) Me Too.. WIERD! > > Does anyone have a wheel mouse which works with X403? > > I have a Logitech MouseMan+ and I had it going under X3 with 'Buttons 6' but it > doesn't work under X4 :( > try: ZAxisMapping 4 5 in the Mouse Section. This works for me under XFree 3, and I *THINK* it's supposed to work on 4 as well.... LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 19:38: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0389B37B71F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:37:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA25625; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:07:48 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20010321213422.B16145@lerami.lerctr.org> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:07:48 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Larry Rosenman Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Joe Kelsey Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 22-Mar-01 Larry Rosenman wrote: > * Daniel O'Connor [010321 21:30]: > > I found this.. Axis movement generating button events :) > :-) Me Too.. WIERD! > > > > Does anyone have a wheel mouse which works with X403? > > > > I have a Logitech MouseMan+ and I had it going under X3 with 'Buttons 6' but it > > doesn't work under X4 :( > > > try: > > ZAxisMapping 4 5 > > in the Mouse Section. This works for me under XFree 3, and I *THINK* > it's supposed to work on 4 as well.... Hmm.. I have that as well (should have said) but I don't get any button 4 or 5 events :( --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 19:46: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from agena.meridian-enviro.com (thunder.meridian-enviro.com [207.109.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6647237B71F; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:46:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Received: from localhost.meridian-enviro.com (kfarms.meridian-enviro.com [10.10.10.20]) by agena.meridian-enviro.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2M3j6Q70791; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:45:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:45:05 -0600 Message-ID: <877l1i5uwu.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> From: rand@meridian-enviro.com To: Mike Tancsa Cc: Mike Smith , rand@meridian-enviro.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20010321211204.0308d800@192.168.0.12> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: $L%T~#'9fAQ])o]A][d7EH`V;"_;2K;TEPQB=v]rDf_2s% This is obviously a really weird case; possibly either an Mike-Smith> extremely narrow race, or some very borderline PCI issue. Mike-Smith> One question I should have asked, but don't recall whether Mike-Smith> you answered; are you using an AMD K7 system by any Mike-Smith> chance? We've seen some *very* weird behaviour with these Mike-Smith> controllers in some K7 systems. Mike-Tancsa> Just a shot in the dark, but could be something to do Mike-Tancsa> with the hard drives themselves ? Are these not the same Mike-Tancsa> units that people have been having problems with across Mike-Tancsa> the board on various OSes and IDE controllers ? e.g. see Mike-Tancsa> the thread Mike-Tancsa> Subject: Re: 2GB limit on gzip? Mike-Tancsa> on questions@freebsd.org. Mike-Tancsa> Different issue, but same model of drives (4 IBM 75GB Mike-Tancsa> DTLA) I have been using only Quantum IDEs on all my boxes Mike-Tancsa> save for a few 40 gig Maxtors on part of my news spool. I read those articles also. The troube is, all of our recent IDE drive purchases have been the IBM DTLA drives. :( We thought they were goo drives. Until this, we *never* had a problem with them. We really don't have any other IDE disks around to try. I just copied a 5GB file and then did a cmp of the two, identical. I'll start a loop of coping the file and comparing them and let it run over night. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 19:56:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zircon.seattle.wa.us (sense-sea-CovadSub-0-228.oz.net [216.39.147.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4368737B71D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:56:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: (qmail 879 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Mar 2001 03:56:15 -0000 From: Joe Kelsey MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15033.30687.471986.540170@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:56:15 -0800 To: John Merryweather Cooper Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 In-Reply-To: <3AB971B3.19CAF111@webmail.bmi.net> References: <3AB83093.73CB14A8@webmail.bmi.net> <15033.23211.276231.469648@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> <20010321205636.A15816@pir.net> <15033.28725.996068.290412@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> <3AB971B3.19CAF111@webmail.bmi.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Merryweather Cooper writes: > Joe Kelsey wrote: > > Peter Radcliffe writes: > > > 4.0.2 is more fussy about mice, but I'm using it perfectly well with > > > moused and ps/2 and USB mice so it isn't completely broken. > > > For moused I found I had to use; > > > Identifier "Mouse1" > > > Driver "mouse" > > > Option "Protocol" "Auto" > > > Option "Device" "/dev/mouse" > > The important line there is setting Protocol to Auto. If you try to > > follow the various FAQs, they recommend(ed) using Sysmouse, which causes > > X to misbehave with moused. Just for the sake of completeness, if you > > are, in fact, using moused, the correct device is /dev/sysmouse, but > > /dev/mouse is really just a symlink to it. > Then the info in sysinstall re entries for the mouse in XF86Config should be > changed to reflect this. No. The information in sysinstall is for XFree86 version 3! XFree86 version 4 is still not "officially" part of FreeBSD. If anything, the port should be changed to mention the problem. If you don't miss using moused, and you have spare serial ports, then more power to you. I have very limited serial ports and I really want moused behavior so I can use the mouse on the various console terms. If you never use the console, never mind. /Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 20: 1:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zircon.seattle.wa.us (sense-sea-CovadSub-0-228.oz.net [216.39.147.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1E7337B722 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:01:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: (qmail 908 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Mar 2001 04:01:34 -0000 From: Joe Kelsey MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15033.31005.964139.227628@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:01:33 -0800 To: Larry Rosenman Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" , Joe Kelsey , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 In-Reply-To: <20010321213422.B16145@lerami.lerctr.org> References: <15033.28725.996068.290412@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> <20010321213422.B16145@lerami.lerctr.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Larry Rosenman writes: > * Daniel O'Connor [010321 21:30]: > > I found this.. Axis movement generating button events :) > :-) Me Too.. WIERD! > > > > Does anyone have a wheel mouse which works with X403? > > > > I have a Logitech MouseMan+ and I had it going under X3 with 'Buttons 6' but it > > doesn't work under X4 :( > > > try: > > ZAxisMapping 4 5 No. If you use moused, DO NOT use ZAxisMapping. You must add a line for the number of buttons, e.g., Buttons 5 If you use moused, add "-z 4" to your moused rc.conf line. You ALSO need to make sure you use Protocol "Auto" in the XF86Config. NOTHING ELSE WORKS WITH moused. If you do not use moused, you must configure everything in XF86Config and you lose use of the mouse on the consoles. /Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 20: 3:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134BD37B720 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:03:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA26115; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:33:04 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15033.31005.964139.227628@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:33:04 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Joe Kelsey Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Larry Rosenman Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 22-Mar-01 Joe Kelsey wrote: > > ZAxisMapping 4 5 > > No. If you use moused, DO NOT use ZAxisMapping. You must add a line > for the number of buttons, e.g., > > Buttons 5 > > If you use moused, add "-z 4" to your moused rc.conf line. You ALSO > need to make sure you use Protocol "Auto" in the XF86Config. NOTHING > ELSE WORKS WITH moused. If you do not use moused, you must configure > everything in XF86Config and you lose use of the mouse on the consoles. Ahah.. Thank you, I will try this tonight. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 20:11:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from edgemaster.zombie.org (edgemaster.creighton.edu [147.134.107.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D5837B718; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:11:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smkelly@zombie.org) Received: by edgemaster.zombie.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 76B95990B; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:11:26 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:11:26 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: Mike Smith Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting with modules Message-ID: <20010321221126.A85432@edgemaster.zombie.org> References: <20010320021855.A433@edgemaster.zombie.org> <200103200851.f2K8pVg16380@mass.dis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103200851.f2K8pVg16380@mass.dis.org>; from msmith@freebsd.org on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:51:31AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:51:31AM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: > Good question. I'll try to reproduce this, but I'm kinda hard up for > time right now, so if anyone else feels like getting involved, I'd be > much obliged. Is it safe to assume this will be "broken" until 4.3-STABLE? I'd look deeper into it, but my knowledge of the area is lacking, and by the time I got up to speed, somebody would have most likely already fixed it. -- Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: 77042C7B smkelly@zombie.org | http://www.zombie.org For PGP key, send e-mail with subject "send pgp key" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 20:21:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vilnya.demon.co.uk (vilnya.demon.co.uk [158.152.19.238]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C6937B71C for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:21:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gandalf@vilnya.demon.co.uk) Received: from haveblue (haveblue.rings [10.2.4.5]) by vilnya.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 74359D9A8; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 04:21:16 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <050b01c0b287$7d6f2920$0504020a@haveblue> From: "Cameron Grant" To: "Donn Miller" , "Hyung-song Nam" Cc: References: <3AB8629F.9C7CE2A0@cvzoom.net> Subject: Re: 4.3BETA, sound module problems Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 04:20:44 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > -The modules are still there after bootup. kldstat shows this: > > Id Refs Address Size Name > > 1 4 0xc0100000 17d7f8 kernel > > 2 1 0xc027e000 c4ae0 vinum.ko > > 3 1 0xc0343000 116e8 snd_pcm.ko > > 4 1 0xc0355000 3d94 snd_sbc.ko > > See, I had the same problem. The problem is that pcm0 is not being > reported in the kernel log messages as being detected, but sbc0 is. Had > pcm0 been detected properly, it would have shown up in the kernel log > messages. So, snd_pcm is loading, but not activating the pcm device. > Statically compiling pcm into my kernel works OK, though. that would be because sbc is not a sound driver. it's a bridge driver for snd_ess, snd_sb16 and snd_sb8. try loading snd_sb16 instead. -cg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 21: 7:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEC937B725 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:07:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2M571099174 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:07:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: compat4x changes to -stable broke release X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010321210701M.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:07:01 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 14 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ===> lib/compat/compat4x.i386 cd /usr/src/lib/compat/compat4x.i386 ; make install DESTDIR=/R/stage/trees/compa t4x SHARED=copies install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libcrypto.so.1 libssl.so.1 /R/stage/trees/c ompat4x/usr/lib/compat usage: install [-CcDpsv] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 file2 install [-CcDpsv] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... *** Error code 64 Looks like the ssl changes need a bit more work. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 21:52:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1120037B719 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:52:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2M1r0E01209; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:53:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103220153.f2M1r0E01209@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: rand@meridian-enviro.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Tancsa , bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:46:30 CST." <87bsqu60eh.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:52:59 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Mike> struct twe_request *tr; > Mike> ... > > Mike> TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, TAILQ_FIRST(sc->twe_busy), tr_link) > Mike> twe_print_request(tr); > > This doesn't compile for me. Every time I try to use 'sc->twe_busy' I > get a syntax error: invalid type argument of `->' Sorry, the above code is totally bogus; I'm kinda delirious (feverish) right now. Try TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, &sc->twe_busy, tr_link) > Yes, it *is* really weird. I can only get it to break with MySQL. From > a suggestion of Mike Tancsa, I tried lots of concurrent bonnies, and > also running a buildworld with a high -j value. I let both run for > about 12 hours each, with no failure. The only thing that'll kill it > is MySQL. I'm confused. :( Don't be; there's a pattern of some sort involved, we just don't know what it is yet... Thanks for confirming this isn't a K7 system. > My pleasure. (Calling what we are doing 'help' is complementary. If > this is help, what you are doing for us must be close to divine > intervention! :)) Bah. I'm working blind here, I need some eyes, and this is a cooperative venture. Take some credit for all the legwork you're doing; once we resolve this, there are going to be lots of people that will benefit from your sweat without even knowing about it. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 21:52:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FDD37B71F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:52:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2M1KwE00867; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:21:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200103220121.f2M1KwE00867@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: rand@meridian-enviro.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Tancsa , bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:50:39 CST." <87u24m7kc0.wl@delta.meridian-enviro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:20:58 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Mike> If you can add another function like twe_printstate that invokes > Mike> twe_print_request on each of the requests on the busy queue and > Mike> let me know what they look like, that might give me some clues. > > OK, I haven't written the twe_printstate function yet, but I think I > have the request. I got the filesystem wedged first, and then browsing > the datastructures with DDB, I think I've found the busy queue. Here's > the request: Cool, this works just as well. 8) > db> call twe_print_request(0xc1529800) > twe0: CMD: request_id 89 opcode size 7 unit 0 host_id 0 > twe0: status 0 flags 0x0 count 16 sgl_offset 3 > twe0: lba 264703 > twe0: 0: 0xce4f000/4096 > twe0: 1: 0x2ab0000/4096 > twe0: tr_command 0xc1529800/0x1749d800 tr_data 0xcb928000/0xce4f000,8192 > twe0: tr_status 2 tr_flags 0x1 tr_complete 0xc011f170 tr_private 0 Er. This is bad; tr_status == 2 means that the command has been completed; it shouldn't still be on the busy queue. Can you check to make sure you have the right queue here? > I'm rebuilding the kernel now with the function twe_printstate, after > I figured it out with the debugger. (This reminds me of a saying that > has to do with horses and carriages, hmm.) Hrm. It *should* be pretty easy; I'm sorry I confused you with the 'printstate' reference; you should be able to fix up twe_report to just dump the busy queue: struct twe_request *tr; ... TAILQ_FOREACH(tr, TAILQ_FIRST(sc->twe_busy), tr_link) twe_print_request(tr); > Oh, btw, it took over 3 million rows to get it stuck this time. Gotta > love a test cycle of 6 hours or so. Sigh. This is obviously a really weird case; possibly either an extremely narrow race, or some very borderline PCI issue. One question I should have asked, but don't recall whether you answered; are you using an AMD K7 system by any chance? We've seen some *very* weird behaviour with these controllers in some K7 systems. Thanks again for your help here. Regards, Mike -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 22:22: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B08437B718 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:21:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from svzserv.kemerovo.su (kost.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.82]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA17454 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:21:47 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su) Message-ID: <3AB999F9.B8B166AE@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:21:45 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: building -STABLE release Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! Finally I've successfully built 3.5-STABLE using 'make release' on my 3.5-STABLE system with mirror of FreeBSD CVS Repository. Now I wonder, is it possible to make 2.2.8-STABLE here or I must run 2.2.8 for it? And what about building of 4-STABLE using running 3.5? The only disappointment: it seems it' not possible to 'make release' automatically because it want to build X from ports and port asks questions. Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 22:29:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server.highperformance.net (ip30.gte4.rb1.bel.nwlink.com [209.20.215.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E78E37B71B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:29:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcwells@highperformance.net) Received: from localhost (jcw@localhost) by server.highperformance.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2M6T6A26472 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:29:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcwells@highperformance.net) X-Authentication-Warning: server.highperformance.net: jcw owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:29:04 -0800 (PST) From: "Jason C. Wells" X-Sender: jcw@server.highperformance.net To: FreeBSD-stable Subject: make world fills / Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A long, long time ago I gave myself a 40MB / partition. I have never had a problem making world until now. The really bad part is that I got this error while /bin/sh was being installed. So I am wondering if I missed something along the way. Is there some new bits I have to twiddle to prevent this? Has / simply grown? Gory details below. Thanks, Jason C. Wells ===> bin/sh install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 sh /bin /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec/elf/strip: /bin/stP12203: No space left on dev ice /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec/elf/strip: /bin/stP12203: No space left on dev ice *** Error code 70 Stop in /usr/src/bin/sh. *** Error code 1 And ... jcw@server ~ $ df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0a 39647 31132 5344 85% / /dev/da0e 19815 3806 14424 21% /var /dev/da0f 992239 409273 503587 45% /home /dev/da0g 3159900 1770414 1136694 61% /usr procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 22:43:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dagobert.skystream.nl (smtp.uwnet.nl [195.7.130.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D6B37B71B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:43:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abgoeree@uwnet.nl) Received: from dyn.dailup.c227128246.isd.to (dyn.dailup.c227128246.isd.to [213.227.128.246]) by dagobert.skystream.nl (8.11.3/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f2M6lM630272 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:47:22 +0100 Received: (qmail 1115 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Mar 2001 06:46:29 -0000 From: "Andre Goeree" Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:46:28 +0100 To: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Message-ID: <20010322074628.A1082@mandark.attica.home> Reply-To: abgoeree@uwnet.nl References: <15033.28725.996068.290412@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from doconnor@gsoft.com.au on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:00:08PM +1030 X-Sender: abgoeree@uwnet.nl Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:00:08PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 22-Mar-01 Joe Kelsey wrote: > > The important line there is setting Protocol to Auto. If you try to > > follow the various FAQs, they recommend(ed) using Sysmouse, which causes > > X to misbehave with moused. Just for the sake of completeness, if you > > are, in fact, using moused, the correct device is /dev/sysmouse, but > > /dev/mouse is really just a symlink to it. > > I found this.. Axis movement generating button events :) > > Does anyone have a wheel mouse which works with X403? > > I have a Logitech MouseMan+ and I had it going under X3 with 'Buttons 6' but it > doesn't work under X4 :( Well, my Logitech MouseMan+ works perfect, even the wheel and extra buttons. My XF86Config: Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse1" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Buttons" "5" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" EndSection I just followed the FreeBSD FAQ, and installed imwheel. --Andre. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 23:17: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from areilly.bpc-users.org (CPE-144-132-234-126.nsw.bigpond.net.au [144.132.234.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FE2437B71A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:17:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: (qmail 68866 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Mar 2001 07:17:01 -0000 From: "Andrew Reilly" Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:17:01 +1100 To: Mike Murphree Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, gibbs@scsiguy.com Subject: Re: Fujitsu M2513A MO drive problem? Message-ID: <20010322181701.A68788@gurney.reilly.home> References: <01032121210100.00489@n4cnw.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01032121210100.00489@n4cnw.dyndns.org>; from n4cnw@knology.net on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:21:01PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:21:01PM -0600, Mike Murphree wrote: > What ever happened with the guy that reported this a few days ago? I hadn't > seen problems on my Symbios 53C875 controller until I rebuilt yesterday and > I seem to have it now too. I rebuilt again tonight and it hasn't changed.... It got better, for some reason... I didn't touch it. It's been happily doing incremental backups every night since I mentioned it. It's a little worrying, but there's nothing to poke or tweak when it's behaving itself... -- Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 23:22:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20A137B71D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:22:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA28621; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:52:40 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20010322074628.A1082@mandark.attica.home> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:52:40 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Andre Goeree Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 22-Mar-01 Andre Goeree wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:00:08PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > My XF86Config: > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse1" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Buttons" "5" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" > EndSection > > I just followed the FreeBSD FAQ, and installed imwheel. Ahh I wanted to use mine with moused.. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 23:36:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208F437B71F; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:36:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2M7Yui06715; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:34:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:34:56 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: , , , Subject: Re: Is it necessary install kerberos in FreeBSD 4.2 and 4.3? In-Reply-To: <20010321131005M.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just browsed through the sysinstall sources a bit: in dist.c: int distSetMinimum(dialogMenuItem *self) { distReset(NULL); Dists = DIST_BIN | DIST_CRYPTO; CRYPTODists |= DIST_CRYPTO_BIN; distVerifyFlags(); return DITEM_SUCCESS | DITEM_REDRAW; } and in dist.h: #define DIST_CRYPTO_BIN \ ( DIST_CRYPTO_CRYPTO | DIST_CRYPTO_KERBEROS4 | DIST_CRYPTO_KERBEROS5 ) There you have it. -gordon On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > It's certainly not included in -stable. The only "default crypto" > is crypto-bin. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 23:40: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671A037B718; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:39:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2M7dUh07005; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:39:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:39:30 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: , , , Subject: Re: Is it necessary install kerberos in FreeBSD 4.2 and 4.3? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG So to actually make a point (rather than just illustrate it). Here's the patch: --- dist.c.orig Wed Mar 21 23:38:28 2001 +++ dist.c Wed Mar 21 23:38:39 2001 @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ { distReset(NULL); Dists = DIST_BIN | DIST_CRYPTO; - CRYPTODists |= DIST_CRYPTO_BIN; + CRYPTODists |= DIST_CRYPTO_CRYPTO; distVerifyFlags(); return DITEM_SUCCESS | DITEM_REDRAW; } This installs just the binary crypto and not the krb stuff. -gordon On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > Just browsed through the sysinstall sources a bit: > > in dist.c: > > int > distSetMinimum(dialogMenuItem *self) > { > distReset(NULL); > Dists = DIST_BIN | DIST_CRYPTO; > CRYPTODists |= DIST_CRYPTO_BIN; > distVerifyFlags(); > return DITEM_SUCCESS | DITEM_REDRAW; > } > > and in dist.h: > > #define DIST_CRYPTO_BIN \ > ( DIST_CRYPTO_CRYPTO | DIST_CRYPTO_KERBEROS4 | DIST_CRYPTO_KERBEROS5 ) > > There you have it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 23:41:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159F737B718; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:41:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2M7f8C07126; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:41:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:41:08 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: , , , Subject: Re: Is it necessary install kerberos in FreeBSD 4.2 and 4.3? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG nm, looks like Jordan got the patch in already. /me is tired. /me goes to bed. -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 23:55:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBE737B71D for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:55:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:53:41 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2M7teD58413; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:55:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:55:38 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: FreeBSD-stable Subject: Re: make world fills / Message-ID: <20010321235538.D574@cjc-desktop.users.reflexcom.com> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jcwells@highperformance.net on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:29:04PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:29:04PM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote: > A long, long time ago I gave myself a 40MB / partition. I have never had > a problem making world until now. The really bad part is that I got this > error while /bin/sh was being installed. > > So I am wondering if I missed something along the way. Is there some new > bits I have to twiddle to prevent this? Has / simply grown? > > Gory details below. > > Thanks, > Jason C. Wells > > ===> bin/sh > install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 sh /bin > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec/elf/strip: /bin/stP12203: No space left > on dev > ice > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec/elf/strip: /bin/stP12203: No space left > on dev > ice > *** Error code 70 > > Stop in /usr/src/bin/sh. > *** Error code 1 > > > And ... > > jcw@server ~ $ df > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/da0a 39647 31132 5344 85% / > /dev/da0e 19815 3806 14424 21% /var > /dev/da0f 992239 409273 503587 45% /home > /dev/da0g 3159900 1770414 1136694 61% /usr > procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc Do you have softupdates enabled on /? When a file is unlinked, it is not actually removed from the disk right away. This can be a problem when you don't have a lot of headroom on the filesystem. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 0:13:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server.highperformance.net (ip30.gte4.rb1.bel.nwlink.com [209.20.215.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B11137B719 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:13:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcwells@highperformance.net) Received: from localhost (jcw@localhost) by server.highperformance.net (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2M8CeK37496; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:12:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcwells@highperformance.net) X-Authentication-Warning: server.highperformance.net: jcw owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:12:39 -0800 (PST) From: "Jason C. Wells" X-Sender: jcw@server.highperformance.net To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: FreeBSD-stable Subject: Re: make world fills / In-Reply-To: <20010321235538.D574@cjc-desktop.users.reflexcom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Crist J. Clark wrote: > Do you have softupdates enabled on /? When a file is unlinked, it is > not actually removed from the disk right away. This can be a problem > when you don't have a lot of headroom on the filesystem. jcw@server ~ $ mount /dev/da0a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates) Ta da. I thought I would do this in preparation for the coming fscklessness that McCusick writes about. I didn't see any harm in it. I guess I'll just have to be careful. That or run 'sync' repeatedly during installworlds. I don't wake world often enough for this to be a major headache. Can one un-tunefs softupdates? Thanks, Jason C. Wells To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 0:22:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.dev.itouchnet.net (mx1.dev.itouchnet.net [196.14.181.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8720537B71D for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:22:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bvi@devco.net) Received: from nobody by mx1.dev.itouchnet.net with scanned_ok (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14g0QI-0008yL-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:26:22 +0200 Received: from [196.14.181.39] (helo=e0-ter-fw1.dev.itouchnet.net) by mx1.dev.itouchnet.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14g0QI-0008y3-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:26:22 +0200 Received: from daemon.prv.dev.itouchnet.net ([192.168.8.10]) by e0-ter-fw1.dev.itouchnet.net with esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1) id 14g0M0-0001Jb-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:21:56 +0200 Received: from bvi by daemon.prv.dev.itouchnet.net with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14g0PO-000HQ1-00; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:25:26 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:25:26 +0200 From: Barry Irwin To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, FreeBSD-stable Subject: Re: make world fills / Message-ID: <20010322102526.T50067@devco.net> References: <20010321235538.D574@cjc-desktop.users.reflexcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jcwells@highperformance.net on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:12:39AM -0800 X-Checked: This message has been scanned for any virusses and unauthorized attachments. X-iScan: Version $Id: iScan,v 1.26 2000/10/08 14:12:55 rip Exp $ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu 2001-03-22 (00:12), Jason C. Wells wrote: > > I guess I'll just have to be careful. That or run 'sync' repeatedly > during installworlds. I don't wake world often enough for this to be a > major headache. > > Can one un-tunefs softupdates? tunefs -n disable Barry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 0:25:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from scully.zoominternet.net (scully.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C84337B719 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:25:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmmiller@cvzoom.net) Received: (qmail 20079 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2001 08:18:50 -0000 Received: from acs-24-154-53-84.zoominternet.net (HELO cvzoom.net) (24.154.53.84) by scully.zoominternet.net with SMTP; 22 Mar 2001 08:18:50 -0000 Message-ID: <3AB9B6F5.45AE801C@cvzoom.net> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 03:25:26 -0500 From: Donn Miller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, FreeBSD-stable Subject: Re: make world fills / References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jason C. Wells" wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > > Do you have softupdates enabled on /? > I guess I'll just have to be careful. That or run 'sync' repeatedly > during installworlds. I don't wake world often enough for this to be a > major headache. A good size for /, IMO, is at least 120 MB. Most of the time, you're gonna wind up with wasted space. But, it helps to have a cushion like this in case something goes wrong. 120MB is very small by today's standards, and I don't see any harm in making / this size. As far as sync'ing more often when the space shrinks, maybe there should be some functions in the softupdates fs code that performs syncing whose frequency is inversely proportional to the space left on the partition when the free space falls below a given threshold. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 2:23:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from deborah.paradise.net.nz (deborah.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527E237B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 02:23:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marki@paradise.net.nz) Received: from evileye (203-79-95-201.apx0.paradise.net.nz [203.79.95.201]) by deborah.paradise.net.nz (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f2MAMto92588; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:22:55 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <014b01c0b2ba$0404d2a0$0101a8c0@evileye> From: "Mark Ibell" To: "Ian Vaudrey" Cc: References: <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E24366E@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:22:35 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Slightly off topic, I notice that you have firmware rev. DDD6 which is apparently the latest if ftp://ftp.quantum.com/Disk_Firmware/Atlas-10KII/ is anything to go by. I'm thinking about upgrading the firmware on some Atlas 10K2's I work with and was wondering what the appropriate tool is. Is it QSHR_LDR.EXE or something else? Quantum doesn't seem to document this process at all! Cheers, Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Vaudrey" To: "'Justin T. Gibbs'" Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 12:16 PM Subject: RE: ahc - Invalidating pack > Here is the current output from dmesg, let me know if this is not enough. > > Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: Tue Mar 20 11:13:52 GMT 2001 > root@mars.talksport.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (501.14-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 > > Features=0x383f9ff PA > T,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE> > real memory = 134152192 (131008K bytes) > avail memory = 126230528 (123272K bytes) > Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc044c000. > Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled > md0: Malloc disk > npx0: on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > pcib0: on motherboard > pci0: on pcib0 > pcib2: at device 1.0 on > pci0 > pci1: on pcib2 > pci1: at 0.0 > isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port 0xa000-0xa00f at device 7.1 on > pci0 > uhci0: port 0xa400-0xa41f irq 15 at device 7.2 > on pc > i0 > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > fxp0: port 0xa800-0xa83f mem > 0xec000000-0xec0f > ffff,0xec101000-0xec101fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci0 > fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:9d:94:e2 > ahc0: port 0xac00-0xacff mem > 0xec100000-0 > xec100fff irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci0 > aic7892: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs > pci0: (vendor=0x125d, dev=0x1969) at 11.0 irq 14 > pcib1: on motherboard > pci2: on pcib1 > fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 > fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold > fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 > sio1: type 16550A > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > plip0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle > da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > da0: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabl > ed > da0: 8759MB (17938985 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1116C) > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a > cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device > cd0: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) > cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - > tray c > losed > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x27 - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0xf8 > STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0xf8 > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0x1220000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0xdc1000 : Length 4096 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x1a - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x119 > STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x119 > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0x113e000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0x101f000 : Length 4096 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x23 - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x119 > STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x119 > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0xf1f000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0x10c0000 : Length 2048 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0xa - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x14a > STACK == 0x67, 0x164, 0x0, 0xe4 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x14a > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0x11de000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0x10bf000 : Length 4096 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x2f - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x149 > STACK == 0x67, 0x164, 0x0, 0xe4 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x149 > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0x16ef000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0xc10000 : Length 2048 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x1d - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x16d > STACK == 0x67, 0x164, 0x0, 0x35 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x16d > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0x7ba000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0x63b000 : Length 4096 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x20 - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x11a > STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x11a > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0x12c0000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0xf81000 : Length 4096 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0xd - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x119 > STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x119 > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0x10fe000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0xfbf000 : Length 4096 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x4c - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0xe4 > STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0xe4 > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0xf5f000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0x1080000 : Length 2048 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): BDR message in message buffer > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x4c - timed out in Message-in phase, SEQADDR == 0x117 > STACK == 0xe4, 0x67, 0x164, 0x0 > SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x117 > SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0xa, SSTAT0 0x0 > SCB count = 80 > Kernel NEXTQSCB = 46 > Card NEXTQSCB = 68 > QINFIFO entries: 68 30 8 14 66 56 16 53 36 45 21 27 59 58 57 4 6 33 38 23 31 > 20 > 67 49 1 50 55 5 37 3 18 25 22 54 40 2 7 69 42 34 41 48 9 15 0 51 > Waiting Queue entries: > Disconnected Queue entries: 24:12 5:17 13:52 3:44 19:43 16:19 23:24 22:13 > 11:32 > 7:29 17:47 2:10 18:35 20:26 9:39 > QOUTFIFO entries: > Sequencer Free SCB List: 21 31 27 29 14 0 28 15 8 10 1 25 6 4 30 12 > Pending list: 51 0 15 9 48 41 34 42 69 7 2 40 54 22 25 18 3 37 5 55 50 1 49 > 67 2 > 0 31 23 38 33 6 4 57 58 59 27 21 45 36 53 16 56 66 14 8 30 68 12 28 11 17 52 > 44 > 43 19 24 76 13 32 29 47 10 35 26 39 > Kernel Free SCB list: 65 77 78 79 60 61 62 63 64 75 74 73 72 71 70 > sg[0] - Addr 0xf5f000 : Length 4096 > sg[1] - Addr 0x1080000 : Length 2048 > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34b > ahc0: Issued Channel A Bus Reset. 64 SCBs aborted > > - Ian > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Justin T. Gibbs [mailto:gibbs@scsiguy.com] > >Sent: 22 March 2001 00:01 > >To: Ian Vaudrey > >Cc: 'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org' > >Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack > > > >Can you provide driver diagnostic messages from this updated kernel? > >I'll need controller and device info too. > > > >-- > >Justin > > > > > ************************************************** > > Privileged/Confidential Information may be > contained in this message. If you are not the > intended recipient of this message (or responsible > for delivery of the message to such person), you > are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, > distribution or reproduction of this message is > prohibited. > > If you have received this message in error, please > notify postmaster@thewirelessgroup.net > immediately. > > Any views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender and may not necessarily > reflect the views of The Wireless Group. > > ************************************************** > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 2:39:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from axis.tdd.lt (axis.tdd.lt [193.219.211.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BC437B71C for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 02:38:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from midom@delfi.lt) Received: from localhost (midom@localhost) by axis.tdd.lt (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2MAcoC68370 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:38:50 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:38:50 +0200 (EET) From: Domas Mituzas X-Sender: midom@axis.tdd.lt To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: kernel panic on 4.3-RC Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG this is what I get on my ISP2150 box, 4.2-GENERIC works well, this configuration I use right now also worked on previous 4.2-stable builds. boot-v-/kerneltext=0x15563d-\|data=0x23c5c+0x1b298|syms=[0x4+0x22710+0x4+0x2735d\SMAP ty pe=01 base=00000000 00000000 len=00000000 0009f400 SMAP type=02 base=00000000 0009f400 len=00000000 00000c00 SMAP type=02 base=00000000 000e8000 len=00000000 00018000 SMAP type=01 base=00000000 00100000 len=00000000 3fef0000 SMAP type=03 base=00000000 3fff0000 len=00000000 0000fc00 SMAP type=04 base=00000000 3ffffc00 len=00000000 00000400 SMAP type=02 base=00000000 fec00000 len=00000000 00010000 SMAP type=02 base=00000000 fee00000 len=00000000 00001000 SMAP type=02 base=00000000 fff80000 len=00000000 00080000 Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-RC #4: Thu Mar 22 12:25:29 EET 2001 root@miss4.delfi.lt:/usr/src/sys/compile/MISS Calibrating clock(s) ... TSC clock: 796636319 Hz, i8254 clock: 1193329 Hz CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION not specified - using default frequency Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION not specified - using old calibration method CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (796.54-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x683 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383fbff real memory = 1073676288 (1048512K bytes) Physical memory chunk(s): 0x00001000 - 0x0009efff, 647168 bytes (158 pages) 0x00309000 - 0x3ffe7fff, 1070460928 bytes (261343 pages) kbdc: DIAGNOSE status:0055 kbdc: TEST_KBD_PORT status:0000 kbdc: DIAGNOSE status:0055 kbdc: TEST_KBD_PORT status:0000 avail memory = 1042718720 (1018280K bytes) Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 SMP: CPU0 apic_initialize(): lint0: 0x00000700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x00000010 SVR: 0x000001ff FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000 bios32: Found BIOS32 Service Directory header at 0xc00f6c20 bios32: Entry = 0xfd7e3 (c00fd7e3) Rev = 0 Len = 1 pcibios: PCI BIOS entry at 0x430 pnpbios: Found PnP BIOS data at 0xc00f6c50 pnpbios: Entry = f0000:ad32 Rev = 1.0 Other BIOS signatures found: ACPI: 000f6ac0 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc02e0000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Creating DISK md0 SMP: CPU0 bsp_apic_configure(): lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00000400 TPR: 0x00000010 SVR: 0x000001ff pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x80000058 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=71a08086) pcib-: pcib0 exists, using next available unit number npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x00000000 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=71a08086) pcib0: on motherboard found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x71a0, revid=0x00 class=06-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base f8000000, size 26 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x71a1, revid=0x00 class=06-04-00, hdrtype=0x01, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=2 secondarybus=1 IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 2 Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected PCI irq 11. found-> vendor=0x9005, dev=0x005f, revid=0x00 class=01-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=2 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 00002000, size 8 map[14]: type 1, range 64, base f4100000, size 12 Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected PCI irq 11. found-> vendor=0x9005, dev=0x005f, revid=0x00 class=01-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=2 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 00002400, size 8 map[14]: type 1, range 64, base f4101000, size 12 IOAPIC #0 intpin 21 -> irq 5 Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected PCI irq 10. found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1229, revid=0x08 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=5 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base f4102000, size 12 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 00002800, size 6 map[18]: type 1, range 32, base f4000000, size 20 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x7110, revid=0x02 class=06-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x7111, revid=0x01 class=01-01-80, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 00002860, size 4 Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected PCI irq 10. found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x7112, revid=0x01 class=0c-03-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=d, irq=5 map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 00002840, size 5 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x7113, revid=0x02 class=06-80-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 map[90]: type 1, range 32, base 00001040, size 4 found-> vendor=0x1013, dev=0x00bc, revid=0x23 class=03-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base f6000000, size 25 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base f4103000, size 12 pci0: on pcib0 pcib2: at device 1.0 on pci0 found-> vendor=0x1011, dev=0x0023, revid=0x06 class=06-04-00, hdrtype=0x01, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=2 secondarybus=2 pci1: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 15.0 on pci1 IOAPIC #0 intpin 20 -> irq 9 Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected PCI irq 5. found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1229, revid=0x0c class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 subordinatebus=0 secondarybus=0 intpin=a, irq=9 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base f4220000, size 12 map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 00003000, size 6 map[18]: type 1, range 32, base f4200000, size 17 pci2: on pcib3 fxp0: port 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xf4200000-0xf421 ffff,0xf4220000-0xf4220fff irq 9 at device 4.0 on pci2 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:2b:02:e2 bpf: fxp0 attached ahc0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xf4100000 -0xf4100fff irq 2 at device 12.0 on pci0 ahc0: Reading SEEPROM...done. ahc0: Manual LVD Termination ahc0: BIOS eeprom is present ahc0: Secondary High byte termination Enabled ahc0: Secondary Low byte termination Enabled ahc0: Primary Low Byte termination Enabled ahc0: Primary High Byte termination Enabled ahc0: Downloading Sequencer Program... 423 instructions downloaded aic7896/97: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs ahc1: port 0x2400-0x24ff mem 0xf4101000 -0xf4101fff irq 2 at device 12.1 on pci0 ahc1: Reading SEEPROM...done. ahc1: Manual LVD Termination ahc1: BIOS eeprom is present ahc1: Secondary High byte termination Enabled ahc1: Secondary Low byte termination Enabled ahc1: Primary Low Byte termination Enabled ahc1: Primary High Byte termination Enabled ahc1: Downloading Sequencer Program... 423 instructions downloaded aic7896/97: Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs using shared irq2. fxp1: port 0x2800-0x283f mem 0xf4000000-0xf40f ffff,0xf4102000-0xf4102fff irq 5 at device 14.0 on pci0 fxp1: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:a9:09:98 bpf: fxp1 attached isab0: at device 18.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x7111) at 18.1 pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x7112) at 1 8.2 irq 5 Timecounter "PIIX" frequency 3579545 Hz chip1: port 0x1040-0x104f at device 18.3 on pci0 pci0: (vendor=0x1013, dev=0x00bc) at 20.0 pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x00000000 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=71a08086) pci-: pci1 exists, using next available unit number pcib1: on motherboard pci3: on pcib1 Trying Read_Port at 203 Trying Read_Port at 243 Trying Read_Port at 283 Trying Read_Port at 2c3 Trying Read_Port at 303 Trying Read_Port at 343 Trying Read_Port at 383 Trying Read_Port at 3c3 isa_probe_children: disabling PnP devices isa_probe_children: probing non-PnP devices fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 kbdc: DIAGNOSE status:0055 kbdc: TEST_KBD_PORT status:0000 kbdc: DIAGNOSE status:0055 kbdc: TEST_KBD_PORT status:0000 psm0: current command byte:0047 kbdc: TEST_AUX_PORT status:0000 kbdc: RESET_AUX return code:00fe kbdc: RESET_AUX return code:00fe kbdc: RESET_AUX return code:00fe kbdc: DIAGNOSE status:0055 kbdc: TEST_KBD_PORT status:0000 psm0: failed to reset the aux device. vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 fb0: vga0, vga, type:VGA (5), flags:0x7007f fb0: port:0x3c0-0x3df, crtc:0x3d4, mem:0xa0000 0x20000 fb0: init mode:24, bios mode:3, current mode:24 fb0: window:0xc00b8000 size:32k gran:32k, buf:0 size:32k VGA parameters upon power-up 50 18 10 00 00 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 06 e0 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff VGA parameters in BIOS for mode 24 50 18 10 00 10 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 00 00 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff EGA/VGA parameters to be used for mode 24 50 18 10 00 10 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 00 00 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff kbdc: DIAGNOSE status:0055 kbdc: TEST_KBD_PORT status:0000 kbdc: DIAGNOSE status:0055 kbdc: TEST_KBD_PORT status:0000 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x100> sc0: fb0, terminal emulator: sc (syscons terminal) sio0: irq maps: 0x41 0x51 0x41 0x41 sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x30 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A, console sio1: irq maps: 0x41 0x49 0x41 0x41 sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices SMP: enabled INTs: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, apic_imen: 0x00fffd83 BIOS Geometries: 0:03fefe3f 0..1022=1023 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 1:03fefe3f 0..1022=1023 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 2:03fefe3f 0..1022=1023 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 3:03fefe3f 0..1022=1023 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 0 accounted for Device configuration finished. APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 bpf: lo0 attached IP packet filtering initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to accept, logging disabled Waiting 10 seconds for SCSI devices to settle (noperiph:ahc0:0:-1:-1): SCSI bus reset delivered. 0 SCBs aborted. (noperiph:ahc1:0:-1:-1): SCSI bus reset delivered. 0 SCBs aborted. SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! SMP: CPU1 apic_initialize(): lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x00000010 SVR: 0x000001ff (probe6:ahc0:0:6:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 1 80 0 ff 0 (probe6:ahc0:0:6:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (probe6:ahc0:0:6:0): Invalid field in CDB (ahc0:A:0:0): Sending WDTR 1 (ahc0:A:0:0): Received WDTR 1 filtered to 1 ahc0: target 0 using 16bit transfers (ahc0:A:0:0): Sending SDTR period a, offset 7f (ahc0:A:0:0): Received SDTR period a, offset 3f Filtered to period a, offset 3f ahc0: target 0 synchronous at 40.0MHz, offset = 0x3f (ahc0:A:2:0): Sending WDTR 1 (ahc0:A:2:0): Received WDTR 1 filtered to 1 ahc0: target 2 using 16bit transfers (ahc0:A:2:0): Sending SDTR period a, offset 7f (ahc0:A:2:0): Received SDTR period a, offset 3f Filtered to period a, offset 3f ahc0: target 2 synchronous at 40.0MHz, offset = 0x3f (ahc0:A:1:0): Sending WDTR 1 (ahc0:A:1:0): Received WDTR 1 filtered to 1 ahc0: target 1 using 16bit transfers (ahc0:A:1:0): Sending SDTR period a, offset 7f (ahc0:A:1:0): Received SDTR period a, offset 3f Filtered to period a, offset 3f ahc0: target 1 synchronous at 40.0MHz, offset = 0x3f (ahc0:A:3:0): Sending WDTR 1 (ahc0:A:3:0): Received WDTR 1 filtered to 1 ahc0: target 3 using 16bit transfers (ahc0:A:3:0): Sending SDTR period a, offset 7f (ahc0:A:3:0): Received SDTR period a, offset 3f Filtered to period a, offset 3f ahc0: target 3 synchronous at 40.0MHz, offset = 0x3f Creating DISK da0 Creating DISK da1 Creating DISK da2 Creating DISK da3 pass0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 pass0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device pass0: Serial Number 149023653592 pass0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabl ed pass1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 pass1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device pass1: Serial Number 149023653551 pass1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabl ed pass2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 pass2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device pass2: Serial Number 143028352051 pass2: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabl ed pass3 at ahc0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 pass3: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device pass3: Serial Number 143028352478 pass3: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabl ed pass4 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 pass4: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device pass4: 3.300MB/s transfers pass4 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 pass4: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device pass4: 3.300MB/s transfers da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: Serial Number 149023653592 da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 8755MB (17930694 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1116C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: Serial Number 149023653551 da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 8755MB (17930694 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1116C) da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da2: Serial Number 143028352051 da2: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da2: 35020MB (71722776 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4464C) da3 at ahc0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 da3: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da3: Serial Number 143028352478 da3: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da3: 35020MB (71722776 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4464C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode mp_lock = 00000002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 fault virtual address = 0xbff6b170 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc021ba45 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc02ffccc frame pointer = 0x10:0xc02ffce8 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) interrupt mask = net tty bio cam <- SMP: XXX trap number = 12 panic: page fault mp_lock = 00000002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 boot() called on cpu#0 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode mp_lock = 00000005; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 fault virtual address = 0x3a fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01eb0f3 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc02ff8d4 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc02ff974 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) interrupt mask = net tty bio cam <- SMP: XXX trap number = 12 panic: page fault mp_lock = 00000005; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 boot() called on cpu#0 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode mp_lock = 00000008; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 fault virtual address = 0x3a fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01eb0f3 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc02ff4dc frame pointer = 0x10:0xc02ff57c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) interrupt mask = net tty bio cam <- SMP: XXX trap number = 12 panic: page fault mp_lock = 00000008; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 boot() called on cpu#0 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode mp_lock = 0000000b; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 01000000 fault virtual address = 0x3a fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01eb0f3 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc02ff0e4 frame pointer = 0x10:0xc02ff184 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (swapper) interrupt mask = net tty bio cam <- SMP: XXX trap number = 12 pani (output from serial console ends) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 3: 6: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nebula.cybercable.fr (d217.dhcp212-126.cybercable.fr [212.198.126.217]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7BA37B722 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 03:06:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mux@qualys.com) Received: (from mux@localhost) by nebula.cybercable.fr (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2MB5VK01078; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:05:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mux) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:05:31 +0100 From: Maxime Henrion To: stable@FreeBSD.org Cc: Joe Kelsey Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Message-ID: <20010322120531.A458@nebula.cybercable.fr> References: <15033.28725.996068.290412@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> <20010321213422.B16145@lerami.lerctr.org> <15033.31005.964139.227628@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15033.31005.964139.227628@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us>; from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 08:01:33PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Joe Kelsey wrote: > Larry Rosenman writes: > > * Daniel O'Connor [010321 21:30]: > > > I found this.. Axis movement generating button events :) > > :-) Me Too.. WIERD! > > > > > > Does anyone have a wheel mouse which works with X403? > > > > > > I have a Logitech MouseMan+ and I had it going under X3 with 'Buttons 6' but it > > > doesn't work under X4 :( > > > > > try: > > > > ZAxisMapping 4 5 > > No. If you use moused, DO NOT use ZAxisMapping. You must add a line > for the number of buttons, e.g., > > Buttons 5 I use Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" in Xfree 4 and it works perfectly. > If you use moused, add "-z 4" to your moused rc.conf line. You ALSO > need to make sure you use Protocol "Auto" in the XF86Config. NOTHING > ELSE WORKS WITH moused. If you do not use moused, you must configure > everything in XF86Config and you lose use of the mouse on the consoles. I don't have "-z 4" and as I already said, it works... Maxime -- Don't be fooled by cheap finnish imitations ; BSD is the One True Code Key fingerprint = F9B6 1D5A 4963 331C 88FC CA6A AB50 1EF2 8CBE 99D6 Public Key : http://www.epita.fr/~henrio_m/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 3:21:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from web11806.mail.yahoo.com (web11806.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.160]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A42837B71F for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 03:21:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wyldephyre2@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010322112151.24918.qmail@web11806.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [131.181.127.39] by web11806.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 03:21:51 PST Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 03:21:51 -0800 (PST) From: Haikal Saadh Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA To: Scott Lambert , FreeBSD-STABLE@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20010320235411.B23244@laptop.os2warp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --- Scott Lambert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:09:02PM -0600, Andrew > Hesford wrote: > > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:09:02 -0600 > > From: Andrew Hesford > > To: Matt Martini > > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA > > > > This is not what I pointed out. > > > > -CURRENT is what you get for the bleeding edge. > > > > -STABLE is what you get for stable code. > > > > The changes in -STABLE are minor and well-tested; > in contrast, there is > > no guarantee that -CURRENT will even build on a > given day. > > > > The big source of confusion on this list is the > distinction between > > BETA, STABLE, RC and RELEASE. As long as people > understand that all are > > the same code branch, there should be no trouble. > > Or to put it another way, -RELEASE is what Sun will > sell you as > Solaris x.x, IBM will sell you as OS/2 x, Microsoft > will sell you as > (insert screwed up nameing scheme here). -STABLE is > Solaris x.x with > the cumulative patchset installed, OS/2 with the > latest fixpack installed, > or Microsoft's next earth shatterringly original > product that you get to > pay for. > > Don't let the fact that we get the source code > confuse you. How many > people run the vendor supplied rev of any OS without > downloading patchsets, > fixpacks (OS/2), or service packs (Microsoft)? The > same ones who only > run -RELEASE on FreeBSD. > > I'm running OS/2 Warp 4 with Fixpack 14 installed. > Which now tells me > it is OS/2 Warp 4.5. Some fixpacks are good, others > really *suck*, > especially now that the user community has convinced > IBM to release the > fixpacks without worrying so much about quality > control. > > On average FreeBSD-STABLE is definitely no less > stable than your average > patchset, fixpack, or service pack you get from > other vendors. > > -CURRENT is the vendors next rev. FreeBSD stable is > about as stable > as other versions next major rev. You just can't > get your hands on > IBM's next version of OS/2 unless you are one of the > OS/2 developers. > You can't get Microsoft's next rev of Windows > unless... well it doesn't > really apply to Microsoft does it? > > -- > Reading my message, I *like* that explanation (other > than the -CURRENT > paragraph), anybody else? > Scott Lambert > lambert@os2warp.org I Like it...the -current bit aside...maybe -current could be analogous to a 'leaked' copy of windows2001 (or whatever?) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 3:56: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.venon.com (ns1.venon.com [64.7.7.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B98C37B71C for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 03:56:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from all@biosys.net) Received: from megalomaniac.biosys.net (megalomaniac.venon.com [64.7.7.82]) by ns1.venon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5371D1613 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:54:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010322065602.00c645f8@216.200.176.7> X-Sender: alle@216.200.176.7 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:56:18 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Asymmetric Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 03:21 3/22/2001 -0800, you wrote: > > -- > > Reading my message, I *like* that explanation (other > > than the -CURRENT > > paragraph), anybody else? > > Scott Lambert > > lambert@os2warp.org > >I Like it...the -current bit aside...maybe -current >could be analogous to a 'leaked' copy of windows2001 >(or whatever?) At the risk of being flamed for knowing too much about MS stuff.. MSDN subscribers get what amounts to -CURRENT if they want to take the time to download it and burn a CD. This would be the various Betas that would be put up at various milestones during the development of whatever particular project. After the betas are done, they move on to the RC stage, just like most projects do. I wouldn't consider freebsd betas to be analogous to ms betas.. freebsd betas are generally a pre-RC phenomenon that is saying something like "check this for bugs.. if you find any, let us know," and RC's are "We're pretty sure we've got all the bugs now, so just get back to us on showstoppers." MS betas are on the other hand no where near the quality of a FreeBSD beta.. for example, MS Whistler (Windows XP, whatever they decide to call it) Beta 1 was nothing more than a tweaked WinME gui slapped on top of Win2k.. and nothing like what (they claim) the release is going to be like except for the basic idea and feel. There is no one to one correlation between ms releases and freebsd releases because freebsd has three pre-release stages, whereas ms products only have two. ms RC's generally encompass the same ideas as freebsd beta's and rc's, rolled into a single stage. -------signature file------- PGP Key Fingerprint: 446B 7718 B219 9F1E 43DD 8E4A 6BE9 D739 CCC5 7FD7 "I don't think [Linux] will be very successful in the long run." "My experience and some of my friends' experience is that Linux is quite unreliable. Microsoft is really unreliable but Linux is worse." -Ken Thompson, Interview May 1999. http://www.freebsd.org FreeBSD - The Power to Serve http://www.rfnj.org Radio Free New Jersey - 493 streams - 40kbps @ 22khz Stereo http://namespace.org -- http://name.space Resist the ICANN! Support name.space! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 4:10:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F4737B720 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 04:10:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f2MCA9g49451; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:10:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.2/8.11.2av) with ESMTP id f2MCA4S49443; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:10:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010322070852.030d0f08@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:10:03 -0500 To: "Jason C. Wells" From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: make world fills / Cc: FreeBSD-stable In-Reply-To: References: <20010321235538.D574@cjc-desktop.users.reflexcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 12:12 AM 3/22/2001 -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote: >I guess I'll just have to be careful. That or run 'sync' repeatedly >during installworlds. I don't wake world often enough for this to be a >major headache. Unfortunately, sync wont help you as it does force a write out immediately. It would be nice if there was such a feature however. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administration, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 4:35: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nettech.com.br (gw.nettech.com.br [200.246.29.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4423337B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 04:34:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from karim@gw.nettech.com.br) Received: (from root@localhost) by gw.nettech.com.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA94187 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:35:05 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from karim@gw.nettech.com.br) Received: from localhost (karim@localhost) by gw.nettech.com.br (8.9.3/8.9.3av) with ESMTP id JAA94166 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:34:34 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from karim@gw.nettech.com.br) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:34:33 -0300 (EST) From: Karim Mansur To: Subject: Sugests Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi I am assembling a FreeBSD server 4.2 STABLE to work with 6000 accounts of email and 1000 virtual domains. It would like sugests of parameters that I can alter in such a way in kernel how much in sysctl to get one better performace. The server is a Dual Pentium III 800 with 512 Mb RAM. -- Karim Mansur To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 6: 3:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net (mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D826337B71D for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:03:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mvh@ix.netcom.com) Received: from netcom1.netcom.com (lai-ca3a-201.ix.netcom.com [209.110.240.201]) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA20560; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:03:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by netcom1.netcom.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 79B9E1142A3; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:02:45 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Harding To: tim@weeble.org.uk Sent-via: tim@weeble.org.uk Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sent-via: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from Tim Joseph on Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:16:45 +0000 (GMT)) Subject: Re: ipf and ppp on FBSD 4.3-beta (fwd) References: Message-Id: <20010322140245.79B9E1142A3@netcom1.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:02:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What changed is that the ipfilter rule set is loaded before the dynamic interfaces like ppp are added. An 'ipf -y' should be put in /etc/rc.network after ppp, etc are initialized but isn't there yet. You also need an 'ipf -y' in ppp.linkup so ipfilter can pick up the new address... Hopefully this can get committed for the release, I wasted some time chasing this down. It's a 2 or so line change. - Mike H. Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:16:45 +0000 (GMT) From: Tim Joseph X-X-Sender: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk No replies on freebsd-questions, so... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:50:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Tim Joseph To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ipf and ppp on FBSD 4.3-beta Hi, I originally installed FBSD 4.2-release, and setup ipf and ppp to run at boot. I recompiled the kernel with a default deny for ipfilter. The relevant bits of my kernel config, rc.conf and ppp.conf below: *kernel* ... options IPFILTER options IPFILTER_LOG options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK ... *rc.conf* ... ipfilter_enable="YES" ipfilter_program="/sbin/ipf -Fa -f" ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf.rules" ... ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="NO" ppp_profile="myisp" ... *ppp.conf* ... default: ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) set device /dev/cuaa0 set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command set speed 115200 set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \ \"\" AT OK-AT-OK ATE1Q0 OK \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 set timeout 120 add default HISADDR # enable dns ... myisp: set phone XXXXXXXXXXXX # set login set authname XXXXXXXXXXXX set authkey XXXXXXXXXXXX set ifaddr AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD 111.222.333.444 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 Where AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD is my fixed ip, and 111.222.333.444 is the ISP's ip. The ipf rules are a bit long to stick them all here, but suffice to say that the bits relevant to my dial-up connection look like this: ... block in log body on tun0 all head 100 block out log body on tun0 all head 150 ... pass out quick proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S/SA keep state keep frags group 150 ... That sort of thing. It's a rule set I've used without hitch on OpenBSD 2.8-stable and on FreeBSD 4.2-release. But on my current version of 4.3-beta (cvsup-ed sometime around 17 March) all packets headed out (and also in) to the tun0 interface ran through the ipf rules with out any matches and then hit the default deny in the kernel. Strange. I assumed I had done something, so I tinkered (cvsup-ing and recompiling and tweaking configs) but got nowhere. I happened to drop to single user mode and then back to multiuser, which of course brought up ipf and ppp - all worked fine! I thought it was solved, but on my next reboot, the same problem ocurred. I went back to single user and back to multi-user, and hey presto it worked! I repeated this 3 or 4 times. I then rebooted and tried "ipf -y" and bingo, packets were matching the rules and were being passed correctly! What has changed since 4.2-release that I need to flush the interface list like this to get things to work? I could put this in a startup script, but I'd like to know why this is now seems to be needed. Thanks. From, Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 6:13:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from devnull.xpert.com (xpert.com [199.203.132.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7229A37B718 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:13:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Yonatan@xpert.com) Received: from mailserv.xpert.com ([199.203.132.135]) by devnull.xpert.com with esmtp (Exim 3.01 #1) id 14g5q2-0001wr-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:13:18 +0200 Received: by mailserv.xpert.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:13:22 +0200 Message-ID: From: Yonatan Bokovza To: "'stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: nmap 2.54b22 permission denied Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:13:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG When testing the new -sO feature, I got this: bash-2.04# nmap -sO 10.0.0.1 Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA22 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) sendto in send_ip_raw: sendto(3, packet, 20, 0, 10.0.0.1, 16) => Permissi on denied Sleeping 15 seconds then retrying sendto in send_ip_raw: sendto(3, packet, 20, 0, 10.0.0.1, 16) => Permissi on denied Sleeping 60 seconds then retrying ^Ccaught SIGINT signal, cleaning up Note i'm root. My sniffer shows outgoing and incoming packets as expected, i.e. zero sized length packets of different protocols. This is -stable of Mar-14. Anyone else seeing this? Yonatan. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 6:49:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76FA37B720 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:49:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA86223; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:49:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:49:44 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200103221449.PAA86223@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proper way to make kernel... In-Reply-To: <20010321205923.A1882@student.uu.se> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.1-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Erik Trulsson wrote: > And besides, the former (using KERNCONF) *is* the preferred way to > compile a kernel. Why? I think it's only preferred (and even required) when you do a make world. If you just changed something in your kernel config file and then build a new one (maybe without even having /usr/src except for sys), then the standard way to do it is the usual "config, make depend, make, make install". Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 7:12:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fredholm.it.uu.se (fredholm.it.uu.se [130.238.15.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E9937B71E for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:12:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ertr1013@csd.uu.se) Received: (from ertr1013@localhost) by fredholm.it.uu.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA17587 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:12:44 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:12:43 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re: proper way to make kernel... Message-ID: <20010322161242.A17495@student.uu.se> References: <20010321205923.A1882@student.uu.se> <200103221449.PAA86223@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103221449.PAA86223@lurza.secnetix.de>; from olli@secnetix.de on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:49:44PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:49:44PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Erik Trulsson wrote: > > And besides, the former (using KERNCONF) *is* the preferred way to > > compile a kernel. > > Why? > > I think it's only preferred (and even required) when you do > a make world. If you just changed something in your kernel > config file and then build a new one (maybe without even > having /usr/src except for sys), then the standard way to do > it is the usual "config, make depend, make, make install". > > Regards > Oliver > In the particular case you describe when you just change the kernel config file and the sources you are building from are the same as were originally used to compile the world then "config, make depend, make, make install" will work just fine. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 7:17:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from terra.talksport.net (terra.talksport.net [195.52.75.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D9337B71A for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:17:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from IVaudrey@talksport.co.uk) Received: from hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk [172.16.2.6]) by terra.talksport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4850525D0F for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:18:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hfxchng01.talksport.co.uk (unverified) by hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:17:11 +0000 Received: by hfexchange.talksport.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1ZN5NX1K>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:17:12 -0000 Message-ID: <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E243672@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> From: Ian Vaudrey To: "'Justin T. Gibbs'" Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: RE: ahc - Invalidating pack Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:17:12 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG That seems to have fixed it. Many thanks for all your help. - Ian >-----Original Message----- >From: Justin T. Gibbs [mailto:gibbs@scsiguy.com] >Sent: 22 March 2001 00:37 >To: Ian Vaudrey >Cc: 'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org' >Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack > >This looks like the bug I MFCed a fix for this morning. Please CVSup >again and resend output if the problem persists. > >-- >Justin > ************************************************** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify postmaster@thewirelessgroup.net immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of The Wireless Group. ************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 7:19:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from terra.talksport.net (terra.talksport.net [195.52.75.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC1237B71E for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:19:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from IVaudrey@talksport.co.uk) Received: from hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk [172.16.2.6]) by terra.talksport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491D225D07 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:20:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hfxchng01.talksport.co.uk (unverified) by hfmailsweeper.talksport.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:19:10 +0000 Received: by hfexchange.talksport.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1ZN5NX1V>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:19:11 -0000 Message-ID: <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E243673@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> From: Ian Vaudrey To: 'Mark Ibell' Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: ahc - Invalidating pack Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:19:10 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG 'Fraid I have no idea which is the correct tool for this, the drive came with that firmware version. If you find out, please could you let me know? - Ian >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Ibell [mailto:marki@paradise.net.nz] >Sent: 22 March 2001 10:23 >To: Ian Vaudrey >Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org >Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack > > >Slightly off topic, I notice that you have firmware rev. DDD6 which is >apparently the latest if >ftp://ftp.quantum.com/Disk_Firmware/Atlas-10KII/ is >anything to go by. I'm thinking about upgrading the firmware >on some Atlas >10K2's I work with and was wondering what the appropriate tool >is. Is it >QSHR_LDR.EXE or something else? Quantum doesn't seem to document this >process at all! > >Cheers, >Mark > ************************************************** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify postmaster@thewirelessgroup.net immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of The Wireless Group. ************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 7:24:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from agena.meridian-enviro.com (thunder.meridian-enviro.com [207.109.234.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C57B37B718; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:24:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Received: from localhost.meridian-enviro.com (kfarms.meridian-enviro.com [10.10.10.20]) by agena.meridian-enviro.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2MFNaQ45889; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:23:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rand@meridian-enviro.com) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:23:35 -0600 Message-ID: <873dc56d54.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> From: rand@meridian-enviro.com To: Mike Tancsa Cc: Mike Smith , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, bryanh@meridian-enviro.com Subject: Re: 3ware problems In-Reply-To: <877l1i5uwu.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> References: <4.2.2.20010321211204.0308d800@192.168.0.12> <877l1i5uwu.wl@localhost.meridian-enviro.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.8 (Smooth) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) X-Face: $L%T~#'9fAQ])o]A][d7EH`V;"_;2K;TEPQB=v]rDf_2s% This is obviously a really weird case; possibly either an Mike-Smith> extremely narrow race, or some very borderline PCI issue. Mike-Smith> One question I should have asked, but don't recall whether Mike-Smith> you answered; are you using an AMD K7 system by any Mike-Smith> chance? We've seen some *very* weird behaviour with these Mike-Smith> controllers in some K7 systems. Mike-Tancsa> Just a shot in the dark, but could be something to do Mike-Tancsa> with the hard drives themselves ? Are these not the same Mike-Tancsa> units that people have been having problems with across Mike-Tancsa> the board on various OSes and IDE controllers ? e.g. see Mike-Tancsa> the thread Mike-Tancsa> Subject: Re: 2GB limit on gzip? Mike-Tancsa> on questions@freebsd.org. Mike-Tancsa> Different issue, but same model of drives (4 IBM 75GB Mike-Tancsa> DTLA) I have been using only Quantum IDEs on all my boxes Mike-Tancsa> save for a few 40 gig Maxtors on part of my news spool. Doug> I read those articles also. The troube is, all of our recent IDE Doug> drive purchases have been the IBM DTLA drives. :( We thought Doug> they were good drives. Until this, we *never* had a problem with Doug> them. We really don't have any other IDE disks around to try. Doug> I just copied a 5GB file and then did a cmp of the two, Doug> identical. I'll start a loop of coping the file and comparing Doug> them and let it run over night. I've now copied that 5GB file 30 times, and each time compared it to the original, and each time both the original and the copy were identical. I don't think this smells like the problem others are having with the IBM drives and an ATA-100 controller. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 7:42: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dagobert.skystream.nl (smtp.uwnet.nl [195.7.130.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BEB37B720 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:42:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abgoeree@uwnet.nl) Received: from dyn.dailup.c227128200.isd.to (dyn.dailup.c227128200.isd.to [213.227.128.200]) by dagobert.skystream.nl (8.11.3/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f2MFji018035 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:45:44 +0100 Received: (qmail 20421 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Mar 2001 15:42:15 -0000 From: "Andre Goeree" Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:42:15 +0100 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: ipfw stateful filtering Message-ID: <20010322164215.A20386@mandark.attica.home> Reply-To: abgoeree@uwnet.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Sender: abgoeree@uwnet.nl Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I'm experimenting a little with stateful filtering. Somehow it doesn't work like i expect; output of "ipfw show": 00100 0 0 check-state 00200 2874 690508 allow ip from any to any via lo0 [snip address checking rules] 02100 0 0 deny tcp from any to any via tun* established 02200 890 308516 allow tcp from any 4000-5000 to any keep-state out xmit tun* setup [snip local network rules] ## Dynamic rules: 02200 889 308472 (T 0, # 176) ty 0 tcp, XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 4025 <-> XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 110 It appears that the check-state rule never matches.. Am i overlooking something? --Andre. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 7:46:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailgate.abacus.co.uk (mailgate.abacus.co.uk [194.130.48.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CF337B718 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:46:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from antony@abacus.co.uk) Received: from abacus.co.uk (pcantony.bl.abacus.co.uk [194.130.48.111]) by mailgate.abacus.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14948; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:44:40 GMT Message-ID: <3ABA1E3C.B3010B12@abacus.co.uk> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:46:04 +0000 From: Antony T Curtis Organization: Abacus Polar PLC (UK) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: abgoeree@uwnet.nl Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw stateful filtering References: <20010322164215.A20386@mandark.attica.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andre Goeree wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm experimenting a little with stateful filtering. > Somehow it doesn't work like i expect; output of "ipfw show": > > 00100 0 0 check-state > 00200 2874 690508 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > [snip address checking rules] > 02100 0 0 deny tcp from any to any via tun* established > 02200 890 308516 allow tcp from any 4000-5000 to any keep-state out xmit tun* setup > [snip local network rules] > ## Dynamic rules: > 02200 889 308472 (T 0, # 176) ty 0 tcp, XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 4025 <-> XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 110 > > It appears that the check-state rule never matches.. > Am i overlooking something? Do you have a divert somewhere in-between to natd? I think you'd need a check-state after that. > --Andre. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- ANTONY T CURTIS Tel: +44 (1635) 36222 Abacus Polar Holdings Ltd Fax: +44 (1635) 38670 > BOO! We changed Coke again! BLEAH! BLEAH! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 8:31: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70D7E37B71A for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:31:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 44980 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2001 16:30:59 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 22 Mar 2001 16:30:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 1043 invoked by uid 145); 22 Mar 2001 16:30:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Mar 2001 16:30:59 -0000 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:30:58 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Matt Dillon Cc: Helge Oldach , , , , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: <200103212103.f2LL3h420596@earth.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Matt Dillon wrote: >.... > :again, running on half-duplex, transfering 100Mb from a client to this > :machine (merlin) > :on client: > :mount -t nfs -o intr,nfsv3,-r=32768,-w=32768 merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt > :dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/zero bs=16k count=64x100 > :104857600 bytes transferred in 12.765062 secs (8214422 bytes/sec) > : > :at the same time, netstat -I fxp0 -w 1 gives me > > Those numbers are fairly good for a half-duplex link. It should work > almost as well with the default blocksize of 8K, even with the additional > return traffic. If it doesn't, something is wrong somewhere. Well, see below. Any hints on how to find out what might be wrong? > > In anycase, setting the interface and the switch to full duplex > (if possible) would give you even better results. You should be > able to max-out the transfer rate for writes at 10MB/sec or so even > using the default 8K block size. Hmm, today we set our two boxes to full-duplex. With UDP, block size=8192 we get around 3Mb/s (tcp 3.5Mb/s) With UDP, block size=16384 we get around 9.5 Mb/s (tcp 9Mb/s) With UDP, block size=32768 we get around 9.3 Mb/s (tcp 5.4Mb/s) > > Ultimately these sequential transfer numbers are meaningless. When > dealing with heavier loads from multiple clients the default block > size of 8K should typically work better. > > -Matt > -- Physikalisches Institut der Universitaet Bonn Nussallee 12 D-53115 Bonn GERMANY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 8:31:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from paperboy.sixforty.co.uk (paperboy.sixforty.co.uk [195.10.242.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBDC37B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:31:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lawrence@epcdirect.co.uk) Received: (from root@localhost) by paperboy.sixforty.co.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2MGVOe86814 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:31:24 GMT (envelope-from lawrence@epcdirect.co.uk) Delivered-To: Received: from lfarr (daisy.int.epcdirect.co.uk [192.168.6.200]) by paperboy.sixforty.co.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1av) with SMTP id f2MGVLL86805 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:31:22 GMT (envelope-from lawrence@epcdirect.co.uk) From: "Lawrence Farr" To: Subject: Make release NOPORTS=YES NODOC=YES Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:31:24 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Further to my previous email regarding "make release" from a script (Included below), running the command: make release CHROOTDIR=/usr/ftp/releasebuilds/4.2-SNAP BUILDNAME=4.2-SNAP RELEASETAG=RELENG_4 NOPORTS=YES NODOC=YES CVSROOT=/home/ncvs errors with: ===> share/doc/papers/kernmalloc (cd /usr/src/share/doc/papers/kernmalloc; soelim kernmalloc.t) > kernmalloc.ms vgrind -f < /usr/src/share/doc/papers/kernmalloc/appendix.t > appendix.ms vgrind: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/src/share/doc/papers/kernmalloc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/share/doc/papers. I have dumped all of /src and /obj, and have vgrind present. From the same shell I can run the command manually. Anyone have any ideas as to what to do? Lawrence Farr EPC Direct Limited mailto:lawrence@epcdirect.co.uk T:01179666123 F:01179666111 M:07970780901 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 8:56:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from silver.teardrop.org (silver.teardrop.org [205.181.101.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBA537B71A for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:56:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from snow@teardrop.org) Received: (from snow@localhost) by silver.teardrop.org (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f2MGuXL19109 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:56:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from snow@teardrop.org) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:56:33 -0500 From: James Snow To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: sshv2 seems to be busted as of last night? Message-ID: <20010322115633.A18513@teardrop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Looking at my cvsup from last night I figured the official fixes for the 'ssh2 cores on invalid username' and the sigpipe bug had gone in. So I remade /usr/src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd but there now seems to be another problem with ssh2. (ssh1 still works.) uname -a: FreeBSD silver.teardrop.org 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Tue Jan 30 17:01:38 EST 2001 snow@silver.teardrop.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SILVER i386 Below, I fire up an sshd on an arbitrary port. ssh1 is still working, so I left the daemon running on 22 so I can login there. Then I login from another 4.2-S box. sshd -d -p 2222: ebug1: sshd version OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321 debug1: read DSA private key done debug1: Bind to port 2222 on 0.0.0.0. Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 2222. Generating 768 bit RSA key. RSA key generation complete. debug1: Server will not fork when running in debugging mode. Connection from fireext.cinteractive.com port 1073 Connection from 205.181.101.2 port 1073 debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; client software version OpenSSH_2.3.0 debug1: match: OpenSSH_2.3.0 pat ^OpenSSH[-_]2\.3 Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321 debug1: send KEXINIT debug1: done debug1: wait KEXINIT debug1: got kexinit: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 debug1: got kexinit: ssh-dss debug1: got kexinit: 3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael128-cbc,rijndael192-cbc,rijndael256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se debug1: got kexinit: 3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael128-cbc,rijndael192-cbc,rijndael256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se debug1: got kexinit: hmac-sha1,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com debug1: got kexinit: hmac-sha1,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com debug1: got kexinit: none debug1: got kexinit: none debug1: got kexinit: debug1: got kexinit: debug1: first kex follow: 0 debug1: reserved: 0 debug1: done debug1: kex: client->server 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none debug1: kex: server->client 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none debug1: Wait SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST. /etc/ssh/primes: No such file or directory WARNING: /etc/ssh/primes does not exist, using old prime debug1: bits set: 504/1024 debug1: Sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP. debug1: Wait SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT. debug1: bits set: 512/1024 debug1: sig size 20 20 debug1: send SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: done: send SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: Wait SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: GOT SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug1: done: KEX2. debug1: userauth-request for user snow service ssh-connection method none debug1: attempt #1 debug1: Starting up PAM with username "snow" Failed none for snow from 205.181.101.2 port 1073 ssh2 debug1: userauth-request for user snow service ssh-connection method password debug1: attempt #2 debug1: PAM Password authentication accepted for user "snow" debug1: PAM setting rhost to "fireext.cinteractive.com" Accepted password for snow from 205.181.101.2 port 1073 ssh2 debug1: Entering interactive session for SSH2. debug1: server_init_dispatch_20 debug1: server_input_channel_open: ctype session rchan 0 win 32768 max 16384 debug1: open session debug1: channel 0: new [server-session] debug1: session_new: init debug1: session_new: session 0 debug1: session_open: channel 0 debug1: session_open: session 0: link with channel 0 debug1: confirm session debug1: session_by_channel: session 0 channel 0 debug1: session_input_channel_req: session 0 channel 0 request pty-req reply 0 debug1: session_pty_req: session 0 alloc /dev/ttyp7 debug1: session_by_channel: session 0 channel 0 debug1: session_input_channel_req: session 0 channel 0 request shell reply 0 debug1: PAM setting tty to "/dev/ttyp7" debug1: do_pam_session: euid 0, uid 0 debug1: PAM establishing creds debug1: fd 7 setting O_NONBLOCK debug1: fd 3 IS O_NONBLOCK debug1: Setting controlling tty using TIOCSCTTY. Ok, so far so good. I seem to be logged in. The system seems to confirm this: snow p7 11:41AM 1 -bash (bash) Client side, however, I see this: ssh -v -2 -p 2222 -l snow silver.teardrop.org: SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090600f). debug: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug: ssh_connect: getuid 100 geteuid 100 anon 1 debug: Connecting to silver.teardrop.org [205.181.101.128] port 2222. debug: Connection established. debug: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321 debug: match: OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321 pat ^OpenSSH[-_]2\.3 Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_2.3.0 debug: send KEXINIT debug: done debug: wait KEXINIT debug: got kexinit: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 debug: got kexinit: ssh-dss debug: got kexinit: 3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael128-cbc,rijndael192-cbc,rijndael256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se debug: got kexinit: 3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael128-cbc,rijndael192-cbc,rijndael256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se debug: got kexinit: hmac-sha1,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com debug: got kexinit: hmac-sha1,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com debug: got kexinit: none,zlib debug: got kexinit: none,zlib debug: got kexinit: debug: got kexinit: debug: first kex follow: 0 debug: reserved: 0 debug: done debug: kex: server->client 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none debug: kex: client->server 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none debug: Sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST. debug: Wait SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP. debug: Got SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP. debug: bits set: 512/1024 debug: Sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT. debug: Wait SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY. debug: Got SSH2_MSG_KEXDH_REPLY. debug: Host 'silver.teardrop.org' is known and matches the DSA host key. debug: bits set: 504/1024 debug: len 55 datafellows 0 debug: dsa_verify: signature correct debug: Wait SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug: GOT SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug: send SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug: done: send SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. debug: done: KEX2. debug: send SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST debug: service_accept: ssh-userauth debug: got SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT debug: authentications that can continue: publickey,password debug: next auth method to try is publickey debug: key does not exist: /usr/home/snow/.ssh/id_dsa debug: next auth method to try is password snow@silver.teardrop.org's password: debug: ssh-userauth2 successfull: method password debug: channel 0: new [client-session] debug: send channel open 0 debug: Entering interactive session. debug: client_init id 0 arg 0 debug: channel request 0: shell debug: channel 0: open confirm rwindow 0 rmax 0 All well and good except that this is where it stops. Where's my login prompt? This terminal is now hung. ^C, ^Z, ^D, and ~. won't get me out of here. I have to kill -9 this ssh session from elsewhere or ^C the daemon. When I ^C the daemon the client reports: Connection to silver.teardrop.org closed by remote host. Connection to silver.teardrop.org closed. debug: Transferred: stdin 0, stdout 0, stderr 101 bytes in 592.5 seconds debug: Bytes per second: stdin 0.0, stdout 0.0, stderr 0.2 debug: Exit status -1 Also noteworthy, if I resize the client window at all, the server sees: debug1: session_input_channel_req: session 0 channel 0 request window-change reply 0 I asked a friend to try this on his 4.2-S box. He cvsup'd, built sshd, and ran it from /usr/obj/... and was able to reproduce this. I'm grabbing /usr/src/crypto/openssh from a box I don't cvsup automatically to keep me going for now. Any suggestions? Any information I should have provided but forgot? :) Thanks, -Snow To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 9:26:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from daedalus.varidyne.com (daedalus.varidyne.com [208.13.62.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288CA37B718 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:26:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsds@daedalus.varidyne.com) Received: (from fbsds@localhost) by daedalus.varidyne.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA63385 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:26:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from fbsds) From: FreeBSD Stable Message-Id: <200103221726.MAA63385@daedalus.varidyne.com> Subject: pr: ports/25155 `ASSERTION FAILED' errors with security/pgp6 on FreeBSD-4.2 STABLE To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:26:35 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL90 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Any chance of getting this fixed? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 10: 3:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dagobert.skystream.nl (smtp.uwnet.nl [195.7.130.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC4F37B720 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:03:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abgoeree@uwnet.nl) Received: from dyn.dailup.c227140158.isd.to (dyn.dailup.c227140158.isd.to [213.227.140.158]) by dagobert.skystream.nl (8.11.3/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f2MI7M020240 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:07:22 +0100 Received: (qmail 21550 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Mar 2001 18:06:09 -0000 From: "Andre Goeree" Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:06:09 +0100 To: Antony T Curtis Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw stateful filtering Message-ID: <20010322190609.A21540@mandark.attica.home> Reply-To: abgoeree@uwnet.nl References: <20010322164215.A20386@mandark.attica.home> <3ABA1E3C.B3010B12@abacus.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3ABA1E3C.B3010B12@abacus.co.uk>; from antony@abacus.co.uk on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:46:04PM +0000 X-Sender: abgoeree@uwnet.nl Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:46:04PM +0000, Antony T Curtis wrote: > Andre Goeree wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm experimenting a little with stateful filtering. > > Somehow it doesn't work like i expect; output of "ipfw show": > > > > 00100 0 0 check-state > > 00200 2874 690508 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > > [snip address checking rules] > > 02100 0 0 deny tcp from any to any via tun* established > > 02200 890 308516 allow tcp from any 4000-5000 to any keep-state out xmit tun* setup > > [snip local network rules] > > ## Dynamic rules: > > 02200 889 308472 (T 0, # 176) ty 0 tcp, XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 4025 <-> XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 110 > > > > It appears that the check-state rule never matches.. > > Am i overlooking something? > > Do you have a divert somewhere in-between to natd? I think you'd need a > check-state after that. No, basically i followed the examples of the ipfw man page. I don't use any natd or divert rules. --Andre. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 11:10:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D7A37B71F for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:10:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:wd9CCYxvU/Nc5isOaRuFTImbJLXi5BnO@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2MJA4673370; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:10:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov) Message-Id: <200103221910.f2MJA4673370@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails In-Reply-To: Message from Kris Kennaway of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 03:50:24 PST." <20010321035024.A1159@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:10:03 -0800 From: Dave Tweten Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG kris@obsecurity.org said: >Sounds like your source code got corrupted somehow. Indeed. That's the angle I had been working for a couple of weeks after my regular weekly automated cvsup-buildworld-buildkernel stopped working. And I now think it's true -- but with a twist: files were corrupted in the kernel buffers and not on disk. The background: --------------- The kernal I was running, under the build was FreeBSD 4.3-BETA (FLOATER) #2: Tue Mar 6 22:17:30 PST 2001 and the machine (NEC Versa 6050MX with 40 MB of memory) gets used for lots of things, so I'm frequently swapping disks and rebooting. The symptoms: ------------- 1. Repeated attempts to cvsup-buildworld died in stage 4, library creation, and with errors indicating file corruption, though I never found the actual corruption. 2. In desperation, I wiped all of /usr/src and repeated. This time I found the corruption. It started at file offset 1024 in an assembler source file. Worried that I may have just cvsupped an entire source tree laden with corrupted files, I tried to run a find -exec grep of all of /usr/src to detect the corrupted files. It didn't work right, but when I went back to look at the corrupted assembler source file, the file was okay! 3. When I dropped back to an old kernel (from February 16), buildworld worked okay up to the point where it needed floater.mc, my custom sendmail config file, which I blew away when I wiped /usr/src. Diagnosis: ---------- The FreeBSD 4.3-BETA kernal of around March 6 had a bug that resulted in very occasional buffer corruption of files that were read. It seems not to have corrupted buffers for files that were written, since my cvsup of everything escaped unscathed. I'm currently repeating the buildworld, after having replaced floater.mc, and will report whether the kernal problem seems to have gone away in sources cvsupped last night. -- M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377 We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 12: 4:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAC937B719; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:04:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2MK49089515; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:04:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: developers@freebsd.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org, qa@freebsd.org Subject: Revised schedule for 4.3-RELEASE X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010322120409J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:04:09 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 35 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi folks, I've thought long and hard about this over the past week and I think we're going to need a bit more time to get 4-stable into the kind of shape I think we all *want* it to be in come release time. Now that people are really starting to ramp up and test the bits, we're getting some interesting reports and some of them may be indicative of issues which are rather severe. It's still too early to tell, but with the release date set for March 30th we also don't really have much time to find out or to fix any of the issues people are current identifying so, without further ado, here's my provisional revised schedule: March 26th: 4.3-RC1 April 2nd: 4.3-RC2 April 10th: 4.3-RC3 April 15th: 4.3-RELEASE Why three RC (Release Candidate) builds rather than just one? Because it seems that people really tend to test the RCs more than the -stable snapshots, which lack ISO images and any real sense of collective effort behind them. If we break this into three checkpoints, each on a Monday, we have a full week for people to syncronize themselves on that RC and make sure that: a) Any bugs they reported in the previous week are gone and b) There are no new bugs they can find. By April 15th, tax day** here in the US, I think we'll be ready to create a very good 4.3-RELEASE! Thanks, - Jordan ** And I already filed mine, so nyah nyah nyah! :-) :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 12: 7:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8788C37B71F for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:07:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2MK6pA93819; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:06:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:06:50 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Andre Goeree Cc: Subject: Re: ipfw stateful filtering In-Reply-To: <20010322164215.A20386@mandark.attica.home> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have the same thing.... If you read the ipfw man page, it actually tells you that you don't need a check-state rule as the first keep-state rule implies check-state. I imagine the counters go elsewhere but I'm not sure. If I get the time, I'll look at the code. -gordon On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Andre Goeree wrote: > I'm experimenting a little with stateful filtering. > Somehow it doesn't work like i expect; output of "ipfw show": > > 00100 0 0 check-state > 00200 2874 690508 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > [snip address checking rules] > 02100 0 0 deny tcp from any to any via tun* established > 02200 890 308516 allow tcp from any 4000-5000 to any keep-state out xmit tun* setup > [snip local network rules] > ## Dynamic rules: > 02200 889 308472 (T 0, # 176) ty 0 tcp, XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 4025 <-> XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 110 > > It appears that the check-state rule never matches.. > Am i overlooking something? > > --Andre. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 12:24:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mnw.eas.slu.edu (mnw.eas.slu.edu [165.134.8.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F242D37B719 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:24:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ejh@ejhslu.eas.slu.edu) Received: from ejhslu.eas.slu.edu (ejhslu.eas.slu.edu [165.134.8.243]) by mnw.eas.slu.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2MKO7R15786; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:24:07 -0600 (CST) Received: (from ejh@localhost) by ejhslu.eas.slu.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id OAA03239; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:24:06 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:24:06 -0600 (CST) From: "Eric J. Haug" Message-Id: <200103222024.OAA03239@ejhslu.eas.slu.edu> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: 4.3-BETA Wed Mar 14 15:18 nfsd hanging in vrlock Cc: ejh@eas.slu.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I have a 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: Wed Mar 14 15:18:36 system with an ATA based vinum raid5. I am trying to copy a 1.7Mb user directory from a Solaris 7 system to a directory on the FreeBSD vinum volume. I have nfs mounted the FreeBSD vinum volume on the Solaris box and started tar cbf 8 - . | ( cd ../r/usera; tar xbBf 8 - ) The Solaris system twice has stopped copying with the error NFS server XXXX not responding still trying. I rebooted the FreeBSD box after the first hang. A ps on the FreeBSD box shows: 0 118 1 0 2 0 360 132 accept Is ?? 0:00.00 nfsd: master 0 120 118 0 -6 0 352 124 vrlock D ?? 0:03.71 nfsd: server 0 121 118 0 -14 0 352 124 inode D ?? 0:00.05 nfsd: server 0 122 118 0 -14 0 352 124 inode D ?? 0:00.04 nfsd: server 0 123 118 0 -14 0 352 124 inode D ?? 0:00.04 nfsd: server The kernel was compiled with -g, otherwise it is a GENERIC kernel. I presume that the FreeBSD nfsd has hung waiting on vrlock. The system is otherwise usable, i.e. console works, remote access works. Eric Haug Saint Louis Univ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 12:27:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F79437B720 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:27:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2MKRRS11053; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:27:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:27:27 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Eric J. Haug" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Wed Mar 14 15:18 nfsd hanging in vrlock Message-ID: <20010322122727.B9431@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <200103222024.OAA03239@ejhslu.eas.slu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103222024.OAA03239@ejhslu.eas.slu.edu>; from ejh@eas.slu.edu on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:24:06PM -0600 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Eric J. Haug [010322 12:25] wrote: > > Hi, > I have a 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: Wed Mar 14 15:18:36 system > with an ATA based vinum raid5. Afaik vinum raid 5 is broken, if you want it fixed, coordinate with Greg Lehey on sending a more complete bug report about this problem otherwise get a hardware raid or stick with vinum mirroring. If Greg doesn't get back to you please let me know, I'll take a look at it, but honestly I've not played with the RAID 5 code much. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 13:16:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-26-235-186.mmcable.com [65.26.235.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 850B037B71F for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:16:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: (qmail 38150 invoked by uid 100); 22 Mar 2001 21:16:31 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15034.27567.887257.171081@guru.mired.org> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:16:31 -0600 To: Erik Trulsson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re: proper way to make kernel... In-Reply-To: <20010322161242.A17495@student.uu.se> References: <20010321205923.A1882@student.uu.se> <200103221449.PAA86223@lurza.secnetix.de> <20010322161242.A17495@student.uu.se> X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Erik Trulsson types: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:49:44PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > And besides, the former (using KERNCONF) *is* the preferred way to > > > compile a kernel. > > I think it's only preferred (and even required) when you do > > a make world. If you just changed something in your kernel > > config file and then build a new one (maybe without even > > having /usr/src except for sys), then the standard way to do > > it is the usual "config, make depend, make, make install". > In the particular case you describe when you just change the kernel config > file and the sources you are building from are the same as were originally > used to compile the world then "config, make depend, make, make install" > will work just fine. That will work fine in any case where the world sources and the installed world match each other. A new kernel config, or having patched the kernel sources and wanting to install patched verfsion (in which case, config and make depend may not be needed either). http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 13:18:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vaio.avias.com (dialup2.avias.com [195.14.38.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F6737B71E for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:18:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from juriy@vaio.avias.com) Received: (from juriy@localhost) by vaio.avias.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2MLL4l68125; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:21:04 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from juriy) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:21:03 +0300 From: Juriy Goloveshkin To: Alex Zepeda Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ad vs wd Message-ID: <20010323002103.B68004@avias.com> References: <20010322234317.A67583@avias.com> <20010322125508.A592@zippy.mybox.zip> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010322125508.A592@zippy.mybox.zip>; from jazepeda@pacbell.net on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:55:08PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:55:08PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote: > > > What type of drive is that ? > > I have this on 2-P2x400 tyan's motherboard and FreeBSD 4-stable... > > and... FreeBSD-4 didn't work with 'ad' drivers more than 4-6 hours. > > sorry, but I cannot do experiments on production box to find out the problem. > > > > this drives work fine only with _OLD_ wd drived. ;( > > please, don't remove wd driver. maybe it's old, but it works on my box fine! > > the disks are: > > Odd. I've got a similar setup: > > atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0 > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > [...] > ad0: 29314MB [59560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 > ad2: 12416MB [25228/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA33 > acd0: CD-RW at ata1-slave PIO4 > > And no seemingly ad related problems, even when my system would decided to > suspend itself, the IBM drive came out unharmed... good for you ;) > > Do you have any power control (APM, ACPI) settings setup perhaps oddly? I have disabled apm ;) > PnP OS set to Yes? what's different? >Any way of getting your controller to not share IRQs? not. beleve me, I tried different combinations of bios' and kernel's parameters, woodoo dances... but I have stable work only with wd... -- Bye Juriy Goloveshkin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 13:25: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vaio.avias.com (dialup2.avias.com [195.14.38.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901F537B719 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:25:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from juriy@vaio.avias.com) Received: (from juriy@localhost) by vaio.avias.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2MLS6668234; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:28:06 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from juriy) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:28:06 +0300 From: Juriy Goloveshkin To: Jesper Skriver Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, sos@freebsd.dk Subject: Re: ad vs wd Message-ID: <20010323002806.A68214@avias.com> References: <20010322234317.A67583@avias.com> <20010322215616.A95073@skriver.dk> <20010323001615.A68004@avias.com> <20010322221743.A95440@skriver.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010322221743.A95440@skriver.dk>; from jesper@skriver.dk on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 10:17:43PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 10:17:43PM +0100, Jesper Skriver wrote: > > > The wd driver doesn't have support for the higher speeds, as the ata > > > driver does, so it looks like bad cables to me, be sure you use proper > > > cables. > > > > my motherboard supports only ata33 so it's better for me to work via wd than > > via unstable(on my box) ad. so please, don't remove wd. > What about fixing your defect HW, my defect hardware(?) works with wd. THAT is a point... > or forcing the ATA driver to use the > lower speeds like the wd driver. I tried. NO effects - unstable work with reboots. -- Bye Juriy Goloveshkin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 13:27: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay07.indigo.ie (relay07.indigo.ie [194.125.133.231]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3747437B71A for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:27:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ddiamond@indigo.ie) Received: (qmail 85947 messnum 1016540 invoked from network[159.134.242.186/donalnt.eng.eircom.net]); 22 Mar 2001 21:27:01 -0000 Received: from donalnt.eng.eircom.net (HELO donalnt2) (159.134.242.186) by relay07.indigo.ie (qp 85947) with SMTP; 22 Mar 2001 21:27:01 -0000 Message-ID: <02fa01c0b316$bb6dedd0$baf2869f@eng.eircom.net> From: "Donal Diamond" To: Subject: Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:26:18 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 13:43:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.yadt.co.uk (yadt.demon.co.uk [158.152.4.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B077F37B71A for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:43:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from davidt@yadt.co.uk) Received: (qmail 21426 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2001 21:43:04 -0000 Received: from gattaca.local.yadt.co.uk (HELO mail.gattaca.yadt.co.uk) (qmailr@10.0.0.2) by xfiles.yadt.co.uk with SMTP; 22 Mar 2001 21:43:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 1116 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Mar 2001 21:43:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:43:03 +0000 From: David Taylor To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.3-BETA crash on 'mount /dev/acd0c /mnt' Message-ID: <20010322214303.A994@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (using: 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #3: Tue Mar 6 18:39:44 GMT 2001) mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /mnt #works ok OTOH, mount /dev/acd0c /mnt causes the following panic: IdlePTD 3657728 initial pcb at 2e2a00 panicstr: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: c7c11000 panic messages: --- panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: c7c11000 #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:469 #1 0xc014af55 in boot (howto=3D256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:3= 09 #2 0xc014b2ed in panic ( fmt=3D0xc027a080 "vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: %lx") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:556 #3 0xc01e39c6 in vm_fault (map=3D0xc02eb30c, vaddr=3D3357331456, fault_type=3D3 '\003', fault_flags=3D0) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:2= 40 #4 0xc0247602 in trap_pfault (frame=3D0xcd718f10, usermode=3D0, eva=3D3357= 331456) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:833 #5 0xc02471ef in trap (frame=3D{tf_fs =3D 16, tf_es =3D 16, tf_ds =3D -107= 2365552, tf_edi =3D -937635840, tf_esi =3D 2352, tf_ebp =3D -848195744, tf_isp =3D -848195780, tf_ebx =3D -1054105728, tf_edx =3D 368, tf_ecx= =3D 304, tf_eax =3D -1058161152, tf_trapno =3D 12, tf_err =3D 2, tf_eip =3D -1071495692, tf_cs =3D 8, tf_eflags =3D 2163202, tf_esp =3D -1054105728, tf_ss =3D -1057923520}) at at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:443 #6 0xc02245f4 in atapi_read (request=3D0xc12b9f80, length=3D2352) at machine/cpufunc.h:222 #7 0xc02240b2 in atapi_interrupt (request=3D0xc12b9f80) at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-all.c:385 #8 0xc021dae1 in ata_intr (data=3D0xc0edbe00) at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c:1150 also: #6 0xc02245f4 in atapi_read (request=3D0xc148b480, length=3D2352) at machine/cpufunc.h:222 #7 0xc02240b2 in atapi_interrupt (request=3D0xc148b480) at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-all.c:385 #8 0xc021dae1 in ata_intr (data=3D0xc0edbe00) at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c:1150 and: #12 0xc02245f4 in atapi_read (request=3D0xc122d380, length=3D2352) at machine/cpufunc.h:222 #13 0xc02240b2 in atapi_interrupt (request=3D0xc122d380) at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-all.c:385 #14 0xc021dae1 in ata_intr (data=3D0xc0edbe00) at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c:1150 When I was originally trying to mount a CD-RW disk, I also saw messages like: "kernel: ata1-master: too many segments in DMA table" I'm not sure if that's because it was a CD-RW which FreeBSD didn't understand, or if it's related to the bug that caused the panic.. 'acd0: READ_CD commmand timeout - resetting' appeared just before the dump. --=20 David Taylor davidt@yadt.co.uk --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6unHnfIqKXSsJ/xERAgsXAJ9H+8cFnEwpDwWPoO4to+dftYJVVwCfbSPy qUlgk0+2qJRL8xdTb2arnds= =YKt7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 13:54:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from daconcepts.dyndns.org (wks-166-129-114.kscable.com [24.166.129.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB2437B718 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:54:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from natedac@kscable.com) Received: from localhost (natedac@localhost) by daconcepts.dyndns.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2MLmh411111 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:48:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from natedac@kscable.com) X-Authentication-Warning: daconcepts.dyndns.org: natedac owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:48:42 -0600 (CST) From: Nate Dannenberg X-X-Sender: Cc: Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA crash on 'mount /dev/acd0c /mnt' In-Reply-To: <20010322214303.A994@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, David Taylor wrote: > (using: 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #3: Tue Mar 6 18:39:44 GMT 2001) > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /mnt #works ok > > OTOH, > > mount /dev/acd0c /mnt > > causes the following panic: I've also experienced problems mounting CD-ROM discs, to the extent that if the bus is busy on one disc, the system will not error out and return a "device busy" message or something else more appropriate. Instead the command and it's controlling console/terminal/shell/whatever hangs until the other device is finished. I have yet to panic the kernel doing this, though. > panicstr: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: c7c11000 (not to downplay this...but isn't that like masking an NMI? :-) -- /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___~~~~~\ | natedac@kscable.com //Z@|___ | | http://home.kscable.com/natedac |'(__ [_< | \_C64/C128_-_What's_*YOUR*_hobby?__\___|____/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 14:18:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from swan.au.en-bio.com (swan.en-bio.COM.AU [203.35.254.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A74C37B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:18:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from TMaher@entigen.com) Received: from shad.au.int.en-bio.com (www-cache.au.en-bio.com [203.35.254.2]) by swan.au.en-bio.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA21885 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:18:09 +1100 Received: (from tonym@localhost) by shad.au.int.en-bio.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id JAA29780 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:17:40 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:17:40 +1100 (EST) From: Tony Maher Message-Id: <200103222217.JAA29780@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Adaptec 19160 and Data Parity Errors Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I had a 4.2 release with Generic kernel on a Pentium 233MHz MMX, and wanted to add scsi tape drive. Installed an Adaptec 19160 and it detected fine but hung after the 15s waiting for scsi devices to settle message. (there are no devices and card set to auto terminate and also tried termination on) Last messages was Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ads01a Put the card in a 4.3-beta box (Celeron 300A built a couple of days ago) and it worked fine. So upgraded the 4.2R to 4.3-beta. Now it boots up but get constant bold messages ahc: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase PCI Interupt at seqaddr=0x8 <- this also alternates with 0x9o They look like they occur on every access to PCI bus. i.e. they do stop but accesses to disk appear to star the these messages again. There is graphics card and intel 100Mb ethernet card occupying 2 PCI slots. Have tried the adaptec card in both the availble free PCI slots - same deal. Tried BIOS setting plug-n-play of and on. Any ideas? Hardware problems? Bios problems? thanks tonym To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 14:25:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from finch-post-12.mail.demon.net (finch-post-12.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD5237B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:25:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tim@weeble.org.uk) Received: from josep.demon.co.uk ([194.222.61.233] helo=doubtful.weeble.foo.uk) by finch-post-12.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14gDWC-0008DZ-0C for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:25:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by doubtful.weeble.foo.uk (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2MMPIg49534 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:25:19 GMT (envelope-from tim@weeble.org.uk) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:25:18 +0000 (GMT) From: Tim Joseph X-X-Sender: To: Subject: UK Keymap? moused? (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG No answers on freebsd-questions, so... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:47:10 +0000 (GMT) From: Tim Joseph To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: UK Keymap? moused? Hi, I'm trying to use UK fonts and a UK keyboard on my PC without much luck. This is what my rc.conf says: ... moused_enable="YES" saver="blank" blanktime="600" font8x8="iso-8x8" font8x14="iso-8x14" font8x16="iso-8x16" keymap="uk.iso" ... This worked with the GENERIC kernel with my original FreeBSD 4.2-release installation. Since then, I've cvsup'd to stable (and currently 4.3-beta), done my "make buildworld" and recompiled my kernel. A now the keymap, fonts and moused don't work! The relevant bits of my kernel config... # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 device vga0 at isa? # splash screen/screen saver pseudo-device splash # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc0 at isa? I've also tried adding: options ATKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP # specify the built-in keymap makeoptions ATKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP="uk.iso" This helped - it gave me the UK keymap. But why doesn't keymap loading in rc.conf work? Also, moused still doesn't work! Here's a snip from my dmesg for info: atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200> Any help would be appreciated. I'll be happy to supply more info if needed. Thanks. From, Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 14:33:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from slip-3.slip.net (slip-3.slip.net [207.171.193.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEEF37B719 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:33:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cshishid@slip.net) Received: from cshishid by slip-3.slip.net with local (Exim 2.02 #1) id 14gDdr-0006IX-00; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:33:15 -0800 Subject: Re: Adaptec 19160 and Data Parity Errors To: TMaher@entigen.com (Tony Maher) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:33:14 -0800 (PST) Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200103222217.JAA29780@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> from "Tony Maher" at Mar 23, 2001 09:17:40 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Clark Shishido Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > ahc: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase > PCI Interupt at seqaddr=0x8 <- this also alternates with 0x9o > there seem to be some issues with the ahc driver in 4.3-BETA and BETA2 see the "ahc invalidating pack" thread for some details. some fixes were just committed so we all need to do a cvsup and recompile. (with a older kernel, of course) I was experiencing write errors with a ahc7896 on an Intel mobo. right now, I'm just testing the hardware with an older FreeBSD release just to make sure. --clark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 14:37:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B776F37B718 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:37:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2MMbCs03130; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:37:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103222237.f2MMbCs03130@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: Clark Shishido Cc: TMaher@entigen.com (Tony Maher), stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adaptec 19160 and Data Parity Errors In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:33:14 PST." Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:37:12 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> >> ahc: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase >> PCI Interupt at seqaddr=0x8 <- this also alternates with 0x9o >> > >there seem to be some issues with the ahc driver in 4.3-BETA and BETA2 >see the "ahc invalidating pack" thread for some details. >some fixes were just committed so we all need to do a cvsup and >recompile. (with a older kernel, of course) Nothing was committed that would affect reported PCI parity errors. It may be that your chipset just doesn't generate parity correctly. It may also be that the card edge is dirty or the slot is. Hard to say. The parity error reporting can be disabled if necessary. I'll look into adding a device flag for that in the near future. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 14:42:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dagobert.skystream.nl (smtp.uwnet.nl [195.7.130.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B24337B718 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:42:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abgoeree@uwnet.nl) Received: from dyn.dailup.c227129086.isd.to (dyn.dailup.c227129086.isd.to [213.227.129.86]) by dagobert.skystream.nl (8.11.3/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f2MMjq025408 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:45:52 +0100 Received: (qmail 16123 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Mar 2001 22:45:18 -0000 From: "Andre Goeree" Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:45:18 +0100 To: Gordon Tetlow Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw stateful filtering Message-ID: <20010322234518.A16010@mandark.attica.home> Reply-To: abgoeree@uwnet.nl References: <20010322164215.A20386@mandark.attica.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from gordont@bluemtn.net on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:06:50PM -0800 X-Sender: abgoeree@uwnet.nl Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:06:50PM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > I have the same thing.... If you read the ipfw man page, it actually tells > you that you don't need a check-state rule as the first keep-state rule > implies check-state. I imagine the counters go elsewhere but I'm not sure. > If I get the time, I'll look at the code. > > -gordon Well, rule 100 must match somehow otherwise all (established) packets would be denied by rule 2100 (before they get to the first keep-state). It's only strange that no counter or timestamp gets updated on rule 100 when incoming packets with keep-state match. On the other hand...: Another thing that's hard for me to understand is the packets going through lo0 (rule 200). I don't have anything hanging on that interface. All internal services use the network ip (192.168.1.10) of the box on rl0. Since the traffic shown in my example was generated only by the localhost the only interface that should have been used is tun*. --Andre. > > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Andre Goeree wrote: > > > I'm experimenting a little with stateful filtering. > > Somehow it doesn't work like i expect; output of "ipfw show": > > > > 00100 0 0 check-state > > 00200 2874 690508 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > > [snip address checking rules] > > 02100 0 0 deny tcp from any to any via tun* established > > 02200 890 308516 allow tcp from any 4000-5000 to any keep-state out xmit tun* setup > > [snip local network rules] > > ## Dynamic rules: > > 02200 889 308472 (T 0, # 176) ty 0 tcp, XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 4025 <-> XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 110 > > > > It appears that the check-state rule never matches.. > > Am i overlooking something? > > > > --Andre. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 14:58:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from swan.au.en-bio.com (swan.en-bio.COM.AU [203.35.254.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E9037B71D for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:58:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from TMaher@entigen.com) Received: from shad.au.int.en-bio.com (www-cache.au.en-bio.com [203.35.254.2]) by swan.au.en-bio.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA00751; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:58:26 +1100 Received: (from tonym@localhost) by shad.au.int.en-bio.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id JAA05645; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:57:55 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:57:55 +1100 (EST) From: Tony Maher Message-Id: <200103222257.JAA05645@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> To: cshishid@slip.net, gibbs@scsiguy.com Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adaptec 19160 and Data Parity Errors Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Nothing was committed that would affect reported PCI parity errors. > It may be that your chipset just doesn't generate parity correctly. > It may also be that the card edge is dirty or the slot is. Hard > to say. The parity error reporting can be disabled if necessary. > I'll look into adding a device flag for that in the near future. Ok. I dont think its the card since its brand new and works ok in the other box. I'll try cleaning the slots and addtionally installing an older 2940 board (have to retrieve it from another box at home so it will take a couple of days). BTW I believe the motherboard uses VIA chipset (and its obviously old version) thank you tonym To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 15: 4:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6581E37B71D for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:04:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 21216 invoked by uid 0); 23 Mar 2001 00:04:37 -0000 Received: from dsl1-160.dynacom.net (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2001 00:04:37 -0000 Message-ID: <3ABA8505.657E650@urx.com> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:04:37 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nate Dannenberg Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA crash on 'mount /dev/acd0c /mnt' References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nate Dannenberg wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, David Taylor wrote: > > > (using: 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #3: Tue Mar 6 18:39:44 GMT 2001) > > > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /mnt #works ok > > > > OTOH, > > > > mount /dev/acd0c /mnt > > > > causes the following panic: > > I've also experienced problems mounting CD-ROM discs, to the extent that > if the bus is busy on one disc, the system will not error out and return a > "device busy" message or something else more appropriate. Instead the > command and it's controlling console/terminal/shell/whatever hangs until > the other device is finished. > > I have yet to panic the kernel doing this, though. I just tried it and it didn't work. The mount complained about incorrect super block. I had /dev/acd0c defined in my fstab as mounting /cdrom. I tried mount /cdrom and it worked. Kent > > > panicstr: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: c7c11000 > > (not to downplay this...but isn't that like masking an NMI? :-) > > -- > /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___~~~~~\ > | natedac@kscable.com //Z@|___ | > | http://home.kscable.com/natedac |'(__ [_< | > \_C64/C128_-_What's_*YOUR*_hobby?__\___|____/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 16: 1:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from silver.teardrop.org (silver.teardrop.org [205.181.101.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B2E37B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:01:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from snow@teardrop.org) Received: (from snow@localhost) by silver.teardrop.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2N014t10771 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:01:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from snow@teardrop.org) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:01:03 -0500 From: James Snow To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshv2 seems to be busted as of last night? Message-ID: <20010322190103.B65914@teardrop.org> References: <20010322115633.A18513@teardrop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010322115633.A18513@teardrop.org>; from snow@teardrop.org on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 11:56:33AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I built the world instead of just sshd and my problem went away. I guess I won't build bits and pieces of the freshly cvsup'd world in the future. :) -Snow On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 11:56:33AM -0500, James Snow wrote: > Looking at my cvsup from last night I figured the official fixes for the > 'ssh2 cores on invalid username' and the sigpipe bug had gone in. So I > remade /usr/src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd but there now seems to be another > problem with ssh2. (ssh1 still works.) > > uname -a: > > FreeBSD silver.teardrop.org 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Tue Jan 30 > 17:01:38 EST 2001 snow@silver.teardrop.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SILVER i386 > > Below, I fire up an sshd on an arbitrary port. ssh1 is still working, so > I left the daemon running on 22 so I can login there. > > Then I login from another 4.2-S box. > > sshd -d -p 2222: > > ebug1: sshd version OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321 > debug1: read DSA private key done > debug1: Bind to port 2222 on 0.0.0.0. > Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 2222. > Generating 768 bit RSA key. > RSA key generation complete. > debug1: Server will not fork when running in debugging mode. > Connection from fireext.cinteractive.com port 1073 > Connection from 205.181.101.2 port 1073 > debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; client software version > OpenSSH_2.3.0 > debug1: match: OpenSSH_2.3.0 pat ^OpenSSH[-_]2\.3 > > Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 > debug1: Local version string SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org > 20010321 > debug1: send KEXINIT > debug1: done > debug1: wait KEXINIT > debug1: got kexinit: > diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 > debug1: got kexinit: ssh-dss > debug1: got kexinit: > 3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael128-cbc,rijndael192-cbc,rijndael256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se > debug1: got kexinit: > 3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael128-cbc,rijndael192-cbc,rijndael256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se > debug1: got kexinit: hmac-sha1,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com > debug1: got kexinit: hmac-sha1,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com > debug1: got kexinit: none > debug1: got kexinit: none > debug1: got kexinit: > debug1: got kexinit: > debug1: first kex follow: 0 > debug1: reserved: 0 > debug1: done > debug1: kex: client->server 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none > debug1: kex: server->client 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none > debug1: Wait SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST. > /etc/ssh/primes: No such file or directory > WARNING: /etc/ssh/primes does not exist, using old prime > debug1: bits set: 504/1024 > debug1: Sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP. > debug1: Wait SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT. > debug1: bits set: 512/1024 > debug1: sig size 20 20 > debug1: send SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. > debug1: done: send SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. > debug1: Wait SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. > debug1: GOT SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. > debug1: done: KEX2. > debug1: userauth-request for user snow service ssh-connection method > none > debug1: attempt #1 > debug1: Starting up PAM with username "snow" > Failed none for snow from 205.181.101.2 port 1073 ssh2 > debug1: userauth-request for user snow service ssh-connection method > password > debug1: attempt #2 > debug1: PAM Password authentication accepted for user "snow" > debug1: PAM setting rhost to "fireext.cinteractive.com" > Accepted password for snow from 205.181.101.2 port 1073 ssh2 > debug1: Entering interactive session for SSH2. > debug1: server_init_dispatch_20 > debug1: server_input_channel_open: ctype session rchan 0 win 32768 max > 16384 > debug1: open session > debug1: channel 0: new [server-session] > debug1: session_new: init > debug1: session_new: session 0 > debug1: session_open: channel 0 > debug1: session_open: session 0: link with channel 0 > debug1: confirm session > debug1: session_by_channel: session 0 channel 0 > debug1: session_input_channel_req: session 0 channel 0 request pty-req > reply 0 > debug1: session_pty_req: session 0 alloc /dev/ttyp7 > debug1: session_by_channel: session 0 channel 0 > debug1: session_input_channel_req: session 0 channel 0 request shell > reply 0 > debug1: PAM setting tty to "/dev/ttyp7" > debug1: do_pam_session: euid 0, uid 0 > debug1: PAM establishing creds > debug1: fd 7 setting O_NONBLOCK > debug1: fd 3 IS O_NONBLOCK > debug1: Setting controlling tty using TIOCSCTTY. > > Ok, so far so good. I seem to be logged in. > > The system seems to confirm this: > > snow p7 11:41AM 1 -bash (bash) > > Client side, however, I see this: > > ssh -v -2 -p 2222 -l snow silver.teardrop.org: > > SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. > Compiled with SSL (0x0090600f). > debug: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config > debug: ssh_connect: getuid 100 geteuid 100 anon 1 > debug: Connecting to silver.teardrop.org [205.181.101.128] port 2222. > debug: Connection established. > debug: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321 > debug: match: OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321 pat ^OpenSSH[-_]2\.3 > > Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 > debug: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_2.3.0 > debug: send KEXINIT > debug: done > debug: wait KEXINIT > debug: got kexinit: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 > debug: got kexinit: ssh-dss > debug: got kexinit: 3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael128-cbc,rijndael192-cbc,rijndael256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se > debug: got kexinit: 3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael128-cbc,rijndael192-cbc,rijndael256-cbc,rijndael-cbc@lysator.liu.se > debug: got kexinit: hmac-sha1,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com > debug: got kexinit: hmac-sha1,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160@openssh.com > debug: got kexinit: none,zlib > debug: got kexinit: none,zlib > debug: got kexinit: > debug: got kexinit: > debug: first kex follow: 0 > debug: reserved: 0 > debug: done > debug: kex: server->client 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none > debug: kex: client->server 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none > debug: Sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST. > debug: Wait SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP. > debug: Got SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP. > debug: bits set: 512/1024 > debug: Sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT. > debug: Wait SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY. > debug: Got SSH2_MSG_KEXDH_REPLY. > debug: Host 'silver.teardrop.org' is known and matches the DSA host key. > debug: bits set: 504/1024 > debug: len 55 datafellows 0 > debug: dsa_verify: signature correct > debug: Wait SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. > debug: GOT SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. > debug: send SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. > debug: done: send SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS. > debug: done: KEX2. > debug: send SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST > debug: service_accept: ssh-userauth > debug: got SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT > debug: authentications that can continue: publickey,password > debug: next auth method to try is publickey > debug: key does not exist: /usr/home/snow/.ssh/id_dsa > debug: next auth method to try is password > snow@silver.teardrop.org's password: > debug: ssh-userauth2 successfull: method password > debug: channel 0: new [client-session] > debug: send channel open 0 > debug: Entering interactive session. > debug: client_init id 0 arg 0 > debug: channel request 0: shell > debug: channel 0: open confirm rwindow 0 rmax 0 > > All well and good except that this is where it stops. Where's my login > prompt? This terminal is now hung. ^C, ^Z, ^D, and ~. won't get me out > of here. I have to kill -9 this ssh session from elsewhere or ^C the > daemon. > > When I ^C the daemon the client reports: > > Connection to silver.teardrop.org closed by remote host. > Connection to silver.teardrop.org closed. > debug: Transferred: stdin 0, stdout 0, stderr 101 bytes in 592.5 seconds > debug: Bytes per second: stdin 0.0, stdout 0.0, stderr 0.2 > debug: Exit status -1 > > Also noteworthy, if I resize the client window at all, the server sees: > > debug1: session_input_channel_req: session 0 channel 0 request window-change reply 0 > > I asked a friend to try this on his 4.2-S box. He cvsup'd, built sshd, > and ran it from /usr/obj/... and was able to reproduce this. > > I'm grabbing /usr/src/crypto/openssh from a box I don't cvsup > automatically to keep me going for now. > > Any suggestions? Any information I should have provided but forgot? :) > > > Thanks, > -Snow > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 16:43:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB4137B71D for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:43:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2N0gwn38628; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:42:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:42:58 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: Tim Joseph Cc: Subject: Re: UK Keymap? moused? (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Did you run mergemaster after you booted with the new world? I don't know if anything went in about this, but it's conceivable. -gordon On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Tim Joseph wrote: > This worked with the GENERIC kernel with my original FreeBSD 4.2-release > installation. > > Since then, I've cvsup'd to stable (and currently 4.3-beta), done my > "make buildworld" and recompiled my kernel. A now the keymap, fonts and > moused don't work! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 17:20:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from limit.org (limit.org [216.102.231.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D9137B719 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:20:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michael@limit.org) Received: (from michael@localhost) by limit.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2N1KcP15342 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:20:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michael) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:20:26 -0800 From: Michael Matsumura To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Slow USB parallel printer adapter Message-ID: <20010322172026.A15245@jupiter.limit.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just bought a Belkin F5U002 USB Parallel Printer adapter, and compiled/installed 4.3-BETA. The problem is that when I attempt to print, the printer does not get the data until a random interval. When it does receive some of the information, it doesn't get all of it, and pauses while it is in the middle of printing, as if something is blocking the data from flowing. echo "test" > /dev/ulpt0 works, after 10 seconds or so. I have a really old Tyan S1686D motherboard with two built-in USB ports... [root:~]# uname -a FreeBSD jupiter.limit.org 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #2: Tue Mar 20 20:42:19 PST 2001 root@jupiter.limit.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JUPITER i386 My kernel config file includes the following entries for the USB device: device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) device ugen # Generic device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device ums # Mouse My dmesg -a: Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #2: Tue Mar 20 20:42:19 PST 2001 root@jupiter.limit.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JUPITER Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (299.15-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x634 Stepping = 4 Features=0x80fbff real memory = 268435456 (262144K bytes) avail memory = 257597440 (251560K bytes) Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0389000. ccd0-3: Concatenated disk drivers Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 2 IOAPIC #0 intpin 18 -> irq 17 IOAPIC #0 intpin 17 -> irq 18 pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xef80-0xef9f irq 2 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ulpt0: Belkin Components (2nd) F5U002 Parallel printer adapter, rev 1.00/1.04, addr 2, iclass 7/1 dc0: <82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX> port 0xec00-0xecff mem 0xffafbf00-0xffafbfff irq 16 at device 10.0 on pci0 dc0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:28:ae:a4 miibus0: on dc0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto dc1: <82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX> port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xffafbe00-0xffafbeff irq 2 at device 11.0 on pci0 dc1: Ethernet address: 00:c0:f0:2d:5a:d2 miibus1: on dc1 ukphy1: on miibus1 ukphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pci0: at 12.0 irq 17 pcm0: port 0xef00-0xef3f irq 18 at device 13.0 on pci0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: flags 0x100 irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: parallel port not found. unknown: can't assign resources unknown: can't assign resources unknown: can't assign resources unknown: can't assign resources unknown: can't assign resources APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 DUMMYNET initialized (010124) IP packet filtering initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default BRIDGE 010131, have 9 interfaces -- index 1 type 6 phy 0 addrl 6 addr 00.a0.cc.28.ae.a4 -- index 2 type 6 phy 0 addrl 6 addr 00.c0.f0.2d.5a.d2 IP Filter: v3.4.16 initialized. Default = pass all, Logging = enabled SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! ad0: 6179MB [12556/16/63] at ata0-master WDMA2 ad1: 19541MB [39703/16/63] at ata0-slave WDMA2 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a Note: I did notice that it is sharing an IRQ with dc1, but that shouldn't matter, since they're pci devices...right?... Anyways, any help would be appreciated -- Michael Matsumura michael@limit.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 17:41:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zircon.seattle.wa.us (sense-sea-CovadSub-0-228.oz.net [216.39.147.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CC8F37B71A for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:41:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: (qmail 3679 invoked by uid 1001); 23 Mar 2001 01:41:46 -0000 From: Joe Kelsey MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15034.43481.821523.868378@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:41:45 -0800 To: abgoeree@uwnet.nl Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 In-Reply-To: <20010322074628.A1082@mandark.attica.home> References: <15033.28725.996068.290412@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> <20010322074628.A1082@mandark.attica.home> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andre Goeree writes: > Well, my Logitech MouseMan+ works perfect, even the wheel and > extra buttons. > > My XF86Config: > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse1" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Buttons" "5" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" > EndSection > > I just followed the FreeBSD FAQ, and installed imwheel. You missed the crucial point: works with moused! Here is my rc.conf settings: moused_type="auto" moused_enable="YES" moused_flags="-m 1=3 -m 3=1 -z 4" Here is my XF86Config: Section "InputDevice" # Identifier and driver Identifier "Mouse1" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "Auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "Buttons" "5" EndSection Please be aware that IF you use moused, the recommendations in the various FAQs and sysinstall is WRONG. For XF86 4.0.1+, you MUST specify Protocol "Auto". If you do not use moused, then this obviously does not apply. /Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 17:44:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19C437B71A for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:44:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA13497; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:14:36 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15033.31005.964139.227628@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:14:36 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Joe Kelsey Subject: Re: Problem with moused or XFree86-4.03 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Larry Rosenman Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 22-Mar-01 Joe Kelsey wrote: > If you use moused, add "-z 4" to your moused rc.conf line. You ALSO > need to make sure you use Protocol "Auto" in the XF86Config. NOTHING > ELSE WORKS WITH moused. If you do not use moused, you must configure > everything in XF86Config and you lose use of the mouse on the consoles. OK this worked for me, thanks :) Now if only X understood button 6 :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 19:16:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B744B37B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:16:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 31174 invoked by uid 0); 23 Mar 2001 03:16:32 -0000 Received: from p3ee2165a.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO speedy.gsinet) (62.226.22.90) by mail.gmx.net (mp001-rz3) with SMTP; 23 Mar 2001 03:16:32 -0000 Received: (from sittig@localhost) by speedy.gsinet (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA10848 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:32:53 +0100 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:32:53 +0100 From: Gerhard Sittig To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Revised schedule for 4.3-RELEASE Message-ID: <20010323003253.Q20830@speedy.gsinet> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20010322120409J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20010322120409J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@osd.bsdi.com on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:04:09PM -0800 Organization: System Defenestrators Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:04 -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > Why three RC (Release Candidate) builds rather than just one? > Because it seems that people really tend to test the RCs more > than the -stable snapshots, which lack ISO images and any real > sense of collective effort behind them. Which mirrors will carry the -RC ISO images? I've been trying to get the one announced here lately and connections were at a few hundred Bytes/s just to stall quite early (after some fifty KB) and make the idle hup close the DSL line. I'd really love to test before release time, but didn't get to the point where I can install at all. And I haven't seen ISO images at the local mirrors. A minimal installation (floppies, bin and crypto) from a German mirror via ISDN already was a pain to get (a new FTP connection for every 240 KB ...) and took ages. So I run a 20010319 snapshot without sources, manpages, doc, ports and X -- short of alternatives. :< Is this congestion symptomatic for the time around a new release or something to solve / circumvent? virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76 Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net -- If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 19:22:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7387637B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:22:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from graywane@home.com) Received: from cg392862-a.adubn1.nj.home.com ([65.2.79.221]) by femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010323032246.FUL14430.femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cg392862-a.adubn1.nj.home.com> for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:22:46 -0800 Received: (from graywane@localhost) by cg392862-a.adubn1.nj.home.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2N3Mjp18341 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:22:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from graywane) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:22:45 -0500 From: Graywane To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Current source tree size. Message-ID: <20010322222244.A18327@home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How much disk space does the entire freebsd cvs repository require? I saw one reference in the handbook that said 650MB but that number looked a little low. --=20 Note: See http://www.members.home.net/graywane/ for PGP information. --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjq6wYQACgkQeHdFaBWUGN0MFACfV46mTGs8rEJZ4nkQMzhy6lNR KK8An2j4E3ruUu6qYOUhyEHYuknSd+RG =OnVA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 19:38:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF3537B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:38:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by thehousleys.net (8.11.3/8.11.2) id f2N3cHi15432; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:38:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) (authenticated) by thehousleys.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2N3cFP15424; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:38:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <3ABAC527.4504157A@thehousleys.net> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:38:15 -0500 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graywane Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current source tree size. References: <20010322222244.A18327@home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Graywane wrote: > > How much disk space does the entire freebsd cvs repository require? > I saw one reference in the handbook that said 650MB but that number > looked a little low. > My copy of the full CVS repository, CVSup'd at 5am EST today is 1107MB. Jim -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- jeh@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve jim@TheHousleys.Net http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- Progress (n) : What led from smart users in front of dumb terminals to dumb users in front of smart terminals. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 19:40:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1784937B718 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:40:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 14gIRE-0006iY-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:40:32 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:40:32 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current source tree size. Message-ID: <20010322224031.I18675@pir.net> Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20010322222244.A18327@home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010322222244.A18327@home.com>; from graywane@home.com on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 10:22:45PM -0500 X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Graywane probably said: > How much disk space does the entire freebsd cvs repository require? > I saw one reference in the handbook that said 650MB but that number > looked a little low. pir@short# du -s cvsup.data 1083311 cvsup.data pir@short# P. -- pir pir@pir.net pir@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 19:42:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD3A37B719 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:42:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA06153; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:42:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200103230342.UAA06153@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Current source tree size. In-Reply-To: <20010322222244.A18327@home.com> from Graywane at "Mar 22, 1 10:22:45 pm" To: graywane@home.com (Graywane) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:42:36 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com Organization: DCF, Inc. X-O/S: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-Unexpected: The Spanish Inquisition X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Graywane wrote: > How much disk space does the entire freebsd cvs repository require? Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/sd2s1e 1490111 1151090 219813 84% /BSDcvs -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 19:48:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from realtime.net (dragon.realtime.net [205.238.128.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C682737B71B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:48:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brucegb@realtime.net) Received: from tigerfish2.my.domain ([205.238.153.236]) by realtime.net ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:48:02 -0600 Received: (from brucegb@localhost) by tigerfish2.my.domain (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2N3mPq41036; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:48:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brucegb) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:48:25 -0600 From: Bruce Burden To: Clark Shishido , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adaptec 19160 and Data Parity Errors Message-ID: <20010322214825.A41000@tigerfish2.my.domain> References: <200103222217.JAA29780@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from cshishid@slip.net on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:33:14PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > > ahc: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase > > PCI Interupt at seqaddr=0x8 <- this also alternates with 0x9o > > > > there seem to be some issues with the ahc driver in 4.3-BETA and BETA2 > see the "ahc invalidating pack" thread for some details. > For what its worth, I have an Adaptec 29160 (operating in 32 bit PCI mode) with 4.3-BETA, 3/15, and it has been going fine. I have a Plextor CD-RW and two 10k rpm IBM SCSI drives (18GB, 36GB) hanging off of the bus. Everything has been working just fine. Of course, I _did_ lose a Seagate 9GB 10k U2W SCSI driver, hanging off of my Adaptec 2940U2W. But, I am pretty certain that was the drive, since its replacement has been fine. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 21: 5:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ED437B71F for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:05:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (216-118-21-147.pdq.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7416111337; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:05:55 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <025601c0b356$ee36c4e0$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: , "Graywane" Cc: References: <200103230342.UAA06153@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Current source tree size. Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:05:51 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG While we're on the topic, I know cvsupd is easy on the bandwidth, compared to how harsh it is on the server, but does anyone have a current setup and an average number of users it can server at a time? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad R. Larson" To: "Graywane" Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 9:42 PM Subject: Re: Current source tree size. > As I recall, Graywane wrote: > > How much disk space does the entire freebsd cvs repository require? > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/sd2s1e 1490111 1151090 219813 84% /BSDcvs > > -crl > -- > Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? > chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com > DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 21: 7: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from corb.mc.mpls.visi.com (corb.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812F237B71E for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:06:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sdk@visi.com) Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by corb.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50163810A for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:05:53 -0600 (CST) Received: (from sdk@localhost) by isis.visi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA20565 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:07:04 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:07:04 -0600 From: Stephen To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: sysinstall bug? Message-ID: <20010322230704.A20069@visi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just completed installing 4.2-20010322-STABLE snap using a sysinstall install.cfg file with the following disk setup: da0s1-1=ufs 131072 / # 64MB da0s1-2=swap 131072 none # 64MB da0s1-3=ufs 131072 /var 1 # 64MB, softup da0s1-4=ufs 0 /usr 1 # freehog, softup diskLabelEditor After the first post-install boot, softupdates were enabled on root but not on /var or /usr, which is contrary to what is documented in the example install.cfg (in /usr/src/release/sysinstall/install.cfg I think). sk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 22:32:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from racine.cybercable.fr (racine.cybercable.fr [212.198.0.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43A6337B71E for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:32:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@gits.dyndns.org) Received: (qmail 2417539 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2001 06:32:48 -0000 Received: from d165.dhcp212-231.cybercable.fr (HELO gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.231.165]) (envelope-sender ) by racine.cybercable.fr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Mar 2001 06:32:48 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.dyndns.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2N6Wls34919 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:32:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from root) From: Cyrille Lefevre Message-Id: <200103230632.f2N6Wls34919@gits.dyndns.org> Subject: commit request To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:32:47 +0100 (CET) Reply-To: clefevre@poboxes.com Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[<97Zd*>^#%Y5Cxv;%Y[PT-LW3;A:fRrJ8+^k"e7@+30g0YD0*^^3jgyShN7o?a]C la*Zv'5NA,=963bM%J^o]C X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, anybody to commit or review the following PRs ? us syscons keymap w/ accent http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=18459 skeyaccess(3) doesn't for primary group http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=22212 sysinstall fdisk's wizard mode is started in raw mode http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24061 add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=19635 typeof(passwd->pw_gid) != typeof(group->gr_gid) http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=22210 add fs type feature to vnconfig(8) to allow direct mount of iso images and co http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25273 more than 256 ptys, up to 1302 ptys. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25866 MIME quoted-printable encoding added to vis/unvis + bug fix http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=26005 thanks in advance. Cyrille. -- home: mailto:clefevre@poboxes.com UNIX is user-friendly; it's just particular work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr about who it chooses to be friends with. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 22 23:56:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CA737B719 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:56:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2N7tw091878; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:55:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Revised schedule for 4.3-RELEASE In-Reply-To: <20010323003253.Q20830@speedy.gsinet> References: <20010322120409J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010323003253.Q20830@speedy.gsinet> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010322235558G.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:55:58 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 8 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Which mirrors will carry the -RC ISO images? I've been trying to > get the one announced here lately and connections were at a few > hundred Bytes/s just to stall quite early (after some fifty KB) > and make the idle hup close the DSL line. I really couldn't say - that's up to the mirrors. :( - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 0: 7:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E528237B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:07:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2N86s091913; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:06:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: sdk@shell.yuck.net Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysinstall bug? In-Reply-To: <20010322230704.A20069@visi.com> References: <20010322230704.A20069@visi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010323000654I.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:06:54 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yep, you found a bug alright. A really stupid one too! :-) Fixed, thanks for the report! - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 0:32:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115C137B71D for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:32:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2N8Vv092109; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:31:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: clefevre@poboxes.com, root@gits.dyndns.org Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: commit request In-Reply-To: <200103230632.f2N6Wls34919@gits.dyndns.org> References: <200103230632.f2N6Wls34919@gits.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010323003157K.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:31:57 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 9 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmmmm. That's a whole bunch of open PRs. You know our usual punishment for that, don't you? We twist your arm way up behind your head and chant "committer! committer!" at you for 48 hours while also depriving you of sleep and shining a bright light in your face. Assuming that it were decided that you merited such punishment, how might you react? :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 2:24:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gekko.i-clue.de (server.ms-agentur.de [62.153.134.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8D037B71D for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 02:24:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from so@server.i-clue.de) Received: from i-clue.de (automatix.i-clue.de [192.168.0.112]) by gekko.i-clue.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id MAA26612; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:31:25 +0100 Message-ID: <3ABB24A9.2282533@i-clue.de> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:25:45 +0100 From: Christoph Sold Reply-To: so@server.i-clue.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yonatan Bokovza Cc: "'stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: nmap 2.54b22 permission denied References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yonatan Bokovza schrieb: > > When testing the new -sO feature, I got this: > > bash-2.04# nmap -sO 10.0.0.1 > Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA22 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) > sendto in send_ip_raw: sendto(3, packet, 20, 0, 10.0.0.1, 16) => Permissi > on denied > Sleeping 15 seconds then retrying > sendto in send_ip_raw: sendto(3, packet, 20, 0, 10.0.0.1, 16) => Permissi > on denied > Sleeping 60 seconds then retrying > ^Ccaught SIGINT signal, cleaning up > > Note i'm root. > My sniffer shows outgoing and incoming packets as expected, i.e. > zero sized length packets of different protocols. > This is -stable of Mar-14. > Anyone else seeing this? Check your firewall rules: reinserting the packages is denied by your firewall. HTH -Christoph Sold To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 6:46:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from segfault.kiev.ua (segfault.kiev.ua [193.193.193.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0E437B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 06:46:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from netch@segfault.kiev.ua) Received: (from netch@localhost) by segfault.kiev.ua (8) id QRO26925; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:45:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from netch) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:45:40 +0200 From: Valentin Nechayev To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: Nick Slager , "Brett G. Lemoine" , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack Message-ID: <20010323164540.I93748@netch.kiev.ua> Reply-To: netch@netch.kiev.ua References: <20010321091044.A307@iv.nn.kiev.ua> <200103211458.f2LEwks79664@aslan.scsiguy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103211458.f2LEwks79664@aslan.scsiguy.com>; from gibbs@scsiguy.com on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:58:46AM -0700 X-42: On Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:58:46, gibbs wrote about "Re: ahc - Invalidating pack": > > Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:43:28, nicks (Nick Slager) wrote about "Re: ahc - Inv > >alidating pack": > S80D is a firmware revision that should be avoided at all costs. > Perhaps some of the performance improvements I've make recently > exacerbate the issues with this firmware revision, but I've yet > to be able to install on disks with that revision. My guess is > that it is really da1 that is causing your problems. But it works stably with ahc driver code before Mar 12 (e.g., cvsup date 2001.03.11.12.00.00). Are you sure that it shall work with code after Mar 20? /netch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 6:49:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0AD37B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 06:49:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from HP2500B (fuggle.veldy.net [64.1.117.28]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DEDD0BA33; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:48:23 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <002201c0b3a7$e67f59f0$3028680a@tgt.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: , "Yonatan Bokovza" Cc: "'stable@freebsd.org'" References: <3ABB24A9.2282533@i-clue.de> Subject: Re: nmap 2.54b22 permission denied Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:45:25 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am seeing it is a well. I have a allow all rule for my LAN. It is definitely not a firewall rule. Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christoph Sold" To: "Yonatan Bokovza" Cc: "'stable@freebsd.org'" Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 4:25 AM Subject: Re: nmap 2.54b22 permission denied > > > Yonatan Bokovza schrieb: > > > > When testing the new -sO feature, I got this: > > > > bash-2.04# nmap -sO 10.0.0.1 > > Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA22 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) > > sendto in send_ip_raw: sendto(3, packet, 20, 0, 10.0.0.1, 16) => Permissi > > on denied > > Sleeping 15 seconds then retrying > > sendto in send_ip_raw: sendto(3, packet, 20, 0, 10.0.0.1, 16) => Permissi > > on denied > > Sleeping 60 seconds then retrying > > ^Ccaught SIGINT signal, cleaning up > > > > Note i'm root. > > My sniffer shows outgoing and incoming packets as expected, i.e. > > zero sized length packets of different protocols. > > This is -stable of Mar-14. > > Anyone else seeing this? > > Check your firewall rules: reinserting the packages is denied by your > firewall. > > HTH > -Christoph Sold > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 7:17: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pickup2-ld.pvd.loa.net (pickup.loa.com [199.171.167.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5945037B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:17:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brentb@loa.com) Received: (qmail 151 invoked by uid 0); 23 Mar 2001 15:10:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kronos) ([208.130.43.227]) (envelope-sender ) by pickup2-ld.pvd.loa.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <>; 23 Mar 2001 15:10:08 -0000 Message-ID: <003101c0b3ab$62a2f480$e32b82d0@cybertours.com> From: "Brent" To: Subject: using 2 pcmcia cards on a laptop Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:10:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG im useing an IBM 365X w/ 2 pcmcia ethernet cards and i cant get both to work at the same time. when i add the second card it says there no available resources. help ?? thanx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 7:45: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mnw.eas.slu.edu (mnw.eas.slu.edu [165.134.8.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69A937B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:45:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ejh@ejhslu.eas.slu.edu) Received: from ejhslu.eas.slu.edu (ejhslu.eas.slu.edu [165.134.8.243]) by mnw.eas.slu.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NFj1021219; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:45:01 -0600 (CST) Received: (from ejh@localhost) by ejhslu.eas.slu.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id JAA04889; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:45:01 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:45:01 -0600 (CST) From: "Eric J. Haug" Message-Id: <200103231545.JAA04889@ejhslu.eas.slu.edu> To: bright@wintelcom.net Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA Wed Mar 14 15:18 nfsd hanging in vrlock Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Alfred, > * Eric J. Haug [010322 12:25] wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I have a 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #0: Wed Mar 14 15:18:36 system > > with an ATA based vinum raid5. > > Afaik vinum raid 5 is broken, if you want it fixed, coordinate with > Greg Lehey on sending a more complete bug report > about this problem otherwise get a hardware raid or stick with > vinum mirroring. I am using vinum raid5 on three systems FreeBSD 4.3-BETA circa Wed Mar 14 15:18:36 FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE Wed Jan 10 17:01:03, and FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE Seems to work ok. unplug a disk, and it does what i would expect. I nfs mounted the Solaris 7 volume on the FreeBSD box and used the FreeBSD tar to copy the directory. That worked as expected. Perhaps there is problem with the FreeBSD nfs server. > > If Greg doesn't get back to you please let me know, I'll take a look at > it, but honestly I've not played with the RAID 5 code much. Eric Haug Saint Louis University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 7:47:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pickup3-ld.pvd.loa.net (pickup.loa.com [199.171.167.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7185A37B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:47:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brentb@loa.com) Received: (qmail 13098 invoked by uid 0); 23 Mar 2001 15:46:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kronos) ([208.130.43.227]) (envelope-sender ) by pickup3-ld.pvd.loa.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <>; 23 Mar 2001 15:46:47 -0000 Message-ID: <004b01c0b3b0$894cc660$e32b82d0@cybertours.com> From: "Brent" To: Subject: ipfw rules ?? Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:47:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG i recently installed ipfw on my Freebsd 4.2 machine...with default to ACCEPT...(i couldnt get the firewall rules to work correctly with default to DENY on in the kernel) is there a place that has a good set of firewall rules when using "default to DENY" in the kernel ??? thanx for all your help in advance B To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 7:57: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5FE37B71D for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:56:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2NFus517324; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:56:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com( 207.76.205.64) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0) id xma017320; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:56:41 -0800 Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2NFufX02807; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:56:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:56:41 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200103231556.f2NFufX02807@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: brentb@loa.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw rules ?? In-Reply-To: <004b01c0b3b0$894cc660$e32b82d0@cybertours.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >From: "Brent" >Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:47:12 -0500 >i recently installed ipfw on my Freebsd 4.2 machine...with default to >ACCEPT...(i couldnt get the firewall rules to work correctly with default to >DENY on in the kernel) Absent a clue as to what "work correctly" might mean for you in this situation, there's little I can do to provide very much guidance. >is there a place that has a good set of firewall >rules when using "default to DENY" in the kernel ??? Well, the distributed /etc/rc.firewall is generally what I use as a starting-point -- rather similar to using GENERIC as the starting-point for a kernel configuration. And in each case, your requirements are going to be fairly specific to your situation. Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator Desk: 650/577-7158 TIE: 8/499-7158 Cell: 650/759-0823 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 8: 2: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jello.geekspace.com (jello.geekspace.com [63.175.99.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72C8B37B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:02:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from psion@geekspace.com) Received: (qmail 10993 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2001 16:07:05 -0000 Received: from footrest.third-rail.net (HELO geekspace.com) (63.175.99.10) by jello.geekspace.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2001 16:07:05 -0000 Message-ID: <3ABB73EA.FAFA0537@geekspace.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:03:54 -0500 From: Chris Williams X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Inconsistancy in supported hardware lists Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Comtrol Rocketport cards are listed in the Misc hardware section of RELNOTES.TXT, but not of HARDWARE.TXT in recent snapshots (prob'ly in releases too, haven't looked). I assume this is just an oversight -- but why is hardware compatibility kept in two different files in the first place? Or are the lists indicative of different levels of support? (should work vs. actually tested, or..) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 8:18:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from postal.incyte.com (postal.incyte.com [198.31.37.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C989737B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:18:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bl@incyte.com) Received: from blah.incyte.com (blah.incyte.com [10.99.1.40]) by postal.incyte.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NGI8509022; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:18:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from blah.incyte.com (bl@localhost) by blah.incyte.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA17819; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:18:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103231618.IAA17819@blah.incyte.com> X-Authentication-Warning: blah.incyte.com: bl owned process doing -bs To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:17:12 GMT." <544628B329466143978F08385B987A6E243672@hfexchange.talksport.co.uk> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:18:10 -0800 From: "Brett G. Lemoine" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, crap. I'm still getting them with a kernel built from a cvsup yesterday early afternoon. (da2:ahc1:0:6:0): SCB 0x3 - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x8 STACK == 0x3, 0x110, 0x166, 0x0 SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 ahc1: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x8 SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0x6, SSTAT0 0x0 SCB count = 20 Kernel NEXTQSCB = 4 Card NEXTQSCB = 4 QINFIFO entries: Waiting Queue entries: Disconnected Queue entries: 0:3 QOUTFIFO entries: Sequencer Free SCB List: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Pending list: 3 Kernel Free SCB list: 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 13 12 11 10 Untagged Q(6): 3 sg[0] - Addr 0xca3a900 : Length 8 (da2:ahc1:0:6:0): Queuing a BDR SCB (da2:ahc1:0:6:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent (da2:ahc1:0:6:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34b ahc1: Bus Device Reset on A:6. 1 SCBs aborted da2 at ahc1 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device da2: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) da2: 1911MB (3915600 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 243C) I'm also still getting the below messages anytime I try to use the on-board ES1371 sound. Mar 19 22:11:55 blur /kernel: ahc0: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x8 Mar 19 22:11:55 blur /kernel: ahc0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase Mar 19 22:11:55 blur /kernel: ahc1: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x9 Mar 19 22:11:55 blur /kernel: ahc1: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase Mar 19 22:11:55 blur /kernel: ahc0: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x9 Mar 19 22:11:55 blur /kernel: ahc0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase Mar 19 22:11:55 blur /kernel: ahc1: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x8 Mar 19 22:11:55 blur /kernel: ahc1: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase What are the chances that these are unrelated? > That seems to have fixed it. Many thanks for all your help. > > - Ian > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Justin T. Gibbs [mailto:gibbs@scsiguy.com] > >Sent: 22 March 2001 00:37 > >To: Ian Vaudrey > >Cc: 'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org' > >Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack > > > >This looks like the bug I MFCed a fix for this morning. Please CVSup > >again and resend output if the problem persists. bl -- //====== Brett G. Lemoine -=- ===============================\\ || Info. Systems Architect |To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. || ||Core Unix System Services|Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, || || Incyte Genomics |unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover || || Palo Alto, California |truth every time you use it.-reddy@austin.ibm.com|| |+-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+| \\== PGP Key Fingerprint: 68 A1 2A 2D 82 CE E9 70 5B 80 D1 11 EC F3 FB 85 ==// To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 8:30:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from intersys.com (gateway.intersys.com [198.133.74.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CE337B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:30:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bojar@intersys.com) Received: by gateway.intersys.com id <115453>; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:35:06 -0500 Message-Id: <01Mar23.113506est.115453@gateway.intersys.com> From: "E. Jordan Bojar" To: Subject: Applying -STABLE source Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:33:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there a way for me to download the most recent -STABLE source and apply it to or replace the 4.2-RELEASE source without using CTM or CVSup? I'd like to be able to burn the source onto a CD for bringing multiple machines up-to-date in a low-bandwidth enviornment. TIA. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 8:38: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from poontang.schulte.org (poontang.schulte.org [209.134.156.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE7A37B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:38:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from christopher@schulte.org) Received: from schulte-laptop.schulte.org (nb-105.netbriefings.com [204.72.185.105]) by poontang.schulte.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA67521; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:37:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from christopher@schulte.org) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010323103552.02cec6a8@pop.schulte.org> X-Sender: schulte@pop.schulte.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:37:22 -0600 To: "E. Jordan Bojar" , From: Christopher Schulte Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source In-Reply-To: <01Mar23.113506est.115453@gateway.intersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mv /usr/src /usr/src.old cvsup stable-supfile Then you'll have a new /usr/src from -STABLE At 11:33 AM 3/23/2001 -0500, E. Jordan Bojar wrote: >Is there a way for me to download the most recent -STABLE source and apply >it to or replace the 4.2-RELEASE source without using CTM or CVSup? I'd >like to be able to burn the source onto a CD for bringing multiple machines >up-to-date in a low-bandwidth enviornment. TIA. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 8:43:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from intersys.com (gateway.intersys.com [198.133.74.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9F937B71E for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:43:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bojar@intersys.com) Received: by gateway.intersys.com id <115464>; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:48:12 -0500 Message-Id: <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> From: "E. Jordan Bojar" To: References: <01Mar23.114238est.115398@gateway.intersys.com> Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:46:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Perhaps I should have given more detail. The reason I said 'without CTM or CVSup' is that I'd like to download the -STABLE source from a fat-pipe loaction without an availible FreeBSD box (ie onto a Windows client). From there, I can burn an ISO/CD to grab /usr/src off of for my poor little bandwidth-deprived boxen. Does this make sense? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Schulte" To: "E. Jordan Bojar" ; Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source > mv /usr/src /usr/src.old > cvsup stable-supfile > > Then you'll have a new /usr/src from -STABLE > > At 11:33 AM 3/23/2001 -0500, E. Jordan Bojar wrote: > >Is there a way for me to download the most recent -STABLE source and apply > >it to or replace the 4.2-RELEASE source without using CTM or CVSup? I'd > >like to be able to burn the source onto a CD for bringing multiple machines > >up-to-date in a low-bandwidth enviornment. TIA. > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 8:50:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (chfdns01.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9130437B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:50:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.35 2001/02/12 09:03:45 smothers Exp $) with ESMTP id QAA09487; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:50:13 GMT Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.14 2001/01/02 18:39:59 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id JAA28681; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:50:13 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id LAA05136; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:50:13 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15035.32453.328506.144742@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:50:13 -0700 To: "E. Jordan Bojar" Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source In-Reply-To: <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> References: <01Mar23.114238est.115398@gateway.intersys.com> <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.92 under Emacs 20.7.2 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Friday, March 23, E. Jordan Bojar wrote: ] > Perhaps I should have given more detail. The reason I said 'without CTM or > CVSup' is that I'd like to download the -STABLE source from a fat-pipe > loaction without an availible FreeBSD box (ie onto a Windows client). From > there, I can burn an ISO/CD to grab /usr/src off of for my poor little > bandwidth-deprived boxen. Does this make sense? > OK. That makes more sense. You could go get snapshots of the code (daily snaps). ftp://releng4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.2-20010323-STABLE/src/ that directory contains all the tarball pieces that would be on a CD. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 8:50:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flounder.jimking.net (flounder.jimking.net [209.205.176.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBD937B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:50:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim@jimking.net) Received: from jking (jking.lgc.com [134.132.76.82]) (authenticated) by flounder.jimking.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2NGo6O45097 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO); Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:50:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jim@jimking.net) Message-ID: <008f01c0b3b9$548296e0$524c8486@jking> From: "Jim King" To: "E. Jordan Bojar" , References: <01Mar23.114238est.115398@gateway.intersys.com> <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:50:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You can download the source tarballs from one of the snapshots on releng4.freebsd.org. cvsup doesn't take a whole lot of bandwidth. On something like 28.8 dialup connection you should be able to update in a reasonable amount of time. Update one box with cvsup then share the wealth with NFS or whatever. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "E. Jordan Bojar" To: Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 10:46 AM Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source > Perhaps I should have given more detail. The reason I said 'without CTM or > CVSup' is that I'd like to download the -STABLE source from a fat-pipe > loaction without an availible FreeBSD box (ie onto a Windows client). From > there, I can burn an ISO/CD to grab /usr/src off of for my poor little > bandwidth-deprived boxen. Does this make sense? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Schulte" > To: "E. Jordan Bojar" ; > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 11:37 AM > Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source > > > > mv /usr/src /usr/src.old > > cvsup stable-supfile > > > > Then you'll have a new /usr/src from -STABLE > > > > At 11:33 AM 3/23/2001 -0500, E. Jordan Bojar wrote: > > >Is there a way for me to download the most recent -STABLE source and > apply > > >it to or replace the 4.2-RELEASE source without using CTM or CVSup? I'd > > >like to be able to burn the source onto a CD for bringing multiple > machines > > >up-to-date in a low-bandwidth enviornment. TIA. > > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 8:55:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from poontang.schulte.org (poontang.schulte.org [209.134.156.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423B737B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:55:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from christopher@schulte.org) Received: from schulte-laptop.schulte.org (nb-105.netbriefings.com [204.72.185.105]) by poontang.schulte.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA68212; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:55:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from christopher@schulte.org) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010323105026.00aadd68@pop.schulte.org> X-Sender: schulte@pop.schulte.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:55:13 -0600 To: "E. Jordan Bojar" , From: Christopher Schulte Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source In-Reply-To: <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> References: <01Mar23.114238est.115398@gateway.intersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:46 AM 3/23/2001 -0500, E. Jordan Bojar wrote: >Perhaps I should have given more detail. The reason I said 'without CTM or >CVSup' is that I'd like to download the -STABLE source from a fat-pipe >loaction without an availible FreeBSD box (ie onto a Windows client). From >there, I can burn an ISO/CD to grab /usr/src off of for my poor little >bandwidth-deprived boxen. Does this make sense? My apologies for not reading your message properly the first time. I don't think the stable source is available via ftp? I'd try to find a freebsd system on a fat pipe, cvsup from there, burn that source to a cd, and carry it with you like you would your wallet or passport in a foreign country. ;p --chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 8:57:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com [171.69.43.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E7937B71D for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:57:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@cisco.com) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA20865; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2NGv2C53651; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:57:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200103231657.f2NGv2C53651@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/19/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Chris Williams Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Inconsistancy in supported hardware lists In-Reply-To: <3ABB73EA.FAFA0537@geekspace.com> References: <3ABB73EA.FAFA0537@geekspace.com> Comments: In-reply-to Chris Williams message dated "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:03:54 -0500." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_515974532P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:57:02 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_515974532P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Chris Williams wrote: > Comtrol Rocketport cards are listed in the Misc hardware section of > RELNOTES.TXT, but not of HARDWARE.TXT in recent snapshots (prob'ly in release > s > too, haven't looked). Hi Chris-- Thanks for pointing this out! I've fixed HARDWARE.TXT for -CURRENT, and I'll MFC this to 4-STABLE on my next commit to the *.TXT files. > I assume this is just an oversight -- but why is > hardware compatibility kept in two different files in the first place? Or are > the lists indicative of different levels of support? (should work vs. actuall > y > tested, or..) I don't think there's a particularly good reason, personally. I'm actually working to get rid of this duplication, because it's a real pain in the rear to deal with. Support for a new device currently requires an edit in N+1 different files, where N is the number of architectures supported. A prototype of the next-generation release notes has the hardware compatability list as a separate document, with the release notes just listing changes between releases. For a preview, see: http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/ Once 4.3-RELEASE is out the door and I figure out some "make release" issues, I intend to commit this to -CURRENT, and eventually to 4-STABLE. Bruce. --==_Exmh_515974532P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE6u4Be2MoxcVugUsMRAm06AKDgcAeYCKM7xxthrNisd5cQdc4GcQCghHxx ccQ1swgwL2QHsktNQkEJVVw= =Dvnd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_515974532P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 9:13:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from intersys.com (gateway.intersys.com [198.133.74.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A2537B71F for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:13:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bojar@intersys.com) Received: by gateway.intersys.com id <115463>; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:18:16 -0500 Message-Id: <01Mar23.121816est.115463@gateway.intersys.com> From: "E. Jordan Bojar" To: References: <01Mar23.114238est.115398@gateway.intersys.com><01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> <01Mar23.115504est.115454@gateway.intersys.com> Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:16:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG And the contents of /usr/src can simply be replaced with the contents of the "ftp://releng4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.2-20010323-STABLE/sr c/" directory and the world made? That's great to know. I was wondering where the daily -STABLE snapshots were hiding... ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Reynolds~" To: "E. Jordan Bojar" Cc: Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 11:50 AM Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source > > [ On Friday, March 23, E. Jordan Bojar wrote: ] > > Perhaps I should have given more detail. The reason I said 'without CTM or > > CVSup' is that I'd like to download the -STABLE source from a fat-pipe > > loaction without an availible FreeBSD box (ie onto a Windows client). From > > there, I can burn an ISO/CD to grab /usr/src off of for my poor little > > bandwidth-deprived boxen. Does this make sense? > > > > OK. That makes more sense. You could go get snapshots of the code (daily > snaps). > > ftp://releng4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.2-20010323-STABLE/src / > > that directory contains all the tarball pieces that would be on a CD. > > -Jr > > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- = > | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | > | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | > | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- = > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 9:26:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from poontang.schulte.org (poontang.schulte.org [209.134.156.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4DF37B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:26:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from christopher@schulte.org) Received: from schulte-laptop.schulte.org (nb-105.netbriefings.com [204.72.185.105]) by poontang.schulte.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA69650 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:26:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from christopher@schulte.org) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010323110817.02cd65e0@pop.schulte.org> X-Sender: schulte@pop.schulte.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:26:08 -0600 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Christopher Schulte Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source In-Reply-To: <15035.32453.328506.144742@hip186.ch.intel.com> References: <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> <01Mar23.114238est.115398@gateway.intersys.com> <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:50 AM 3/23/2001 -0700, John Reynolds~ wrote: >OK. That makes more sense. You could go get snapshots of the code (daily >snaps). > > >ftp://releng4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.2-20010323-STABLE/src/ > >that directory contains all the tarball pieces that would be on a CD. > >-Jr This little gem is indeed located in the handbook, at http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/current-stable.html#AEN13094. I think it might be more useful if perhaps also mentioned on the ftp mirror list page of the handbook. This would be the logical place one would perhaps begin looking for said stable sources via ftp. >-- >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >| John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | >| Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | >| jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= --chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 9:37:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gactr.uga.edu (mail.gactr.uga.edu [128.192.37.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7DF137B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:37:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Robin_Blanchard@gactr.uga.edu) Received: (qmail 5525 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2001 17:37:42 -0000 Received: from qat.noc.nat (HELO gactr.uga.edu) ([10.10.100.125]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.servers.nat (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Mar 2001 17:37:42 -0000 Message-ID: <3ABB89BF.F75D3775@gactr.uga.edu> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:37:03 -0500 From: "Robin P. Blanchard" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: hacking installation... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've got a 486 machine with some peculiar hardware that the default kernel from the install floppy won't detect, namely the scsi (aic driver). In the past I've simply built a kernel on another box and replaced the kernel on the install floppy with that one and all was fine (had to again again boot off floppy and use the live filesystem CD in order to mount the harddisk and copy the working kernel from the hacked install floppy). The machine I'm using to build my custom kernel is FreeBSD-4.3RC cvs'ed from this morning. Here's the snippet from my kernel config: options INET #InterNETworking options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support options MFS #Memory Filesystem options MFS_ROOT options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS #Process filesystem options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options SCSI_DELAY=5000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support options UCONSOLE #Allow users to grab the console options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev However, using this kernel, the installer fails to load claiming I have no kernel support for mfs as a root device. What am I doing wrong? Or, is there an easier way for me to install this 486 that doesn't require me going about the hacked install method (the problem is that the aic driver expects/detects the chip to be at IRQ 12 but it is at 11). -- ------------------------------------ Robin P. Blanchard IT Program Specialist Georgia Center for Continuing Ed. fon: 706.542.2404 fax: 706.542.6546 email: Robin_Blanchard@gactr.uga.edu ------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 9:38:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from intersys.com (gateway.intersys.com [198.133.74.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602C137B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:38:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bojar@intersys.com) Received: by gateway.intersys.com id <115489>; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:42:53 -0500 Message-Id: <01Mar23.124253est.115489@gateway.intersys.com> From: "E. Jordan Bojar" To: References: <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com><01Mar23.114238est.115398@gateway.intersys.com><01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> <01Mar23.123142est.115481@gateway.intersys.com> Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:40:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I went over that page several times and still I missed it completely! My bad. A link in the mirror list makes sense to me as well. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Schulte" To: Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 12:26 PM Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source > At 09:50 AM 3/23/2001 -0700, John Reynolds~ wrote: > >OK. That makes more sense. You could go get snapshots of the code (daily > >snaps). > > > > > >ftp://releng4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.2-20010323-STABLE/sr c/ > > > >that directory contains all the tarball pieces that would be on a CD. > > > >-Jr > > This little gem is indeed located in the handbook, at > http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/current-stable.html#AEN13094. > > I think it might be more useful if perhaps also mentioned on the ftp mirror > list page of the handbook. This would be the logical place one would > perhaps begin looking for said stable sources via ftp. > > >-- > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= > >| John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | > >| Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | > >| jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= > > --chris > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 9:51:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-10.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961EB37B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:51:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from h.kroonen@brinktech.nl) Received: from [195.173.234.248] (helo=brinktech.nl) by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.14 #2) id 14gViW-00055h-00; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:51:17 +0000 Received: from p-harry ([192.168.111.247]) by brinktech.nl with SMTP (Mailtraq/1.1.4.1132) id BRNK737023F74; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:50:46 +0100 From: "Harry Kroonen" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:50:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source Reply-To: h.kroonen@brinktech.nl Cc: bojar@intersys.com Message-ID: <3ABB9B06.10575.11D04FF@localhost> In-reply-to: <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) X-Hops: 1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > At 11:33 AM 3/23/2001 -0500, E. Jordan Bojar wrote: > > >Is there a way for me to download the most recent -STABLE source > > >and apply > > >it to or replace the 4.2-RELEASE source without using CTM or CVSup? > > > I'd like to be able to burn the source onto a CD for bringing > > >multiple machines > > >up-to-date in a low-bandwidth enviornment. TIA. From: "E. Jordan Bojar" Date sent: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:46:12 -0500 > Perhaps I should have given more detail. The reason I said 'without > CTM or CVSup' is that I'd like to download the -STABLE source from a > fat-pipe loaction without an availible FreeBSD box (ie onto a Windows > client). From there, I can burn an ISO/CD to grab /usr/src off of for > my poor little bandwidth-deprived boxen. Does this make sense? You still can use CTM. And when you want to walk around with a CD, to my newbie experience CTM even feels like the most logical way. You can get the files using any ftp-client, put them on a CD. Nothing FreeBSD-ish happening yet. For the -stable branch, you need a 'complete' set starting with the latest "src-4.0x00xEmpty.gz", and all the following "src-4.0xyz.gz" files. The 'empty' file is about 60MB, all the (~daily) changes after that are usually a few kb only. Put the CD in your FreeBSD box, mount /cdrom mv /usr/src /usr/src.old mkdir /usr/src cd /usr/src ctm -v /cdrom/src-4.0* and that's all (check before you do; this is from the top of my head). Also check out the handbook for the full story, and on what to do afterwards. HTH, Harry Kroonen ps. You need a fair bit of 'make'ing after installing the sources. I guess there are ways to avoid having to re'make' everything on each individual machine. Ask the experts :-). ps2. didn't see any new CTM files since about a week ago. Anybody know more about it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 10: 4: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.awyeah.net (awyeah-server.resnet.wisc.edu [146.151.136.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C28137B71D for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:03:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dave@awyeah.net) Received: from bum (witt136-111.resnet.wisc.edu [146.151.136.111]) by shell.awyeah.net (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NI2qw05658 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:02:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dave@awyeah.net) From: "Dave" To: Subject: Error message: dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:04:18 -0600 Message-ID: <005801c0b3c3$ae2be200$6f889792@bum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have seen messages in the list archives about this problem, but for most people it seems that they don't have any noticeable problems associated with this, whereas I actually do. Yesterday, my NetGear FA310TX seemed to stop working (i.e. no traffic would go in our out). At about the same time, I got a whole bunch of these messages in my syslog: dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state I did an "ifconfig dc0 down" and then an "ifconfig dc0 up" and it seemed to restore it to normal operation. I don't know if this is a problem with my card or with the driver in - -STABLE, but this is the first time I've experienced this with this machine. I believe the last time I updated was the 16th or 17th, I wish I remembered. This is the very first time I've seen this with this machine, and I haven't changed any configuration options. Like I said, I know this has been on the list before, but it doesn't seem to have caused any real problems for anyone else. Anyway, if anyone knows anything more about this, I wouldn't mind any suggestions :-) Thanks, - - Dave -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBOruN9VxcxgQ+C0vyEQIlGACfbM9VRQOfgyPTjEh8Wfh82OWFxMIAn2t5 d1DkHK8qkl9BPKeYFcD/rGOi =pBBr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 10:23:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA09037B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:23:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA68365; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:23:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:23:26 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200103231823.TAA68365@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Revised schedule for 4.3-RELEASE In-Reply-To: <20010322235558G.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.1-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > Which mirrors will carry the -RC ISO images? I've been trying to > > get the one announced here lately and connections were at a few > > hundred Bytes/s just to stall quite early (after some fifty KB) > > and make the idle hup close the DSL line. > > I really couldn't say - that's up to the mirrors. :( I'll _try_ to put 'em up at ftp7.de.freebsd.org, if I can. No promises, though, 'cause I'm extremely busy. Regards Oliver PS: Oh BTW, just in case anyone's interested -- The (German) Lehmanns Edition of 4.3-Release will consists of _five_ CDs. We already had big problems putting all that stuff on four CDs for 4.2 and had to drop the CVS repo and some other things. Fortunately we could convince the folks at Lehmanns to use five CDs this time (without even changing the price, as far as I know). The repo will be there again on disc #2. :) -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 10:58:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FF037B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:58:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from HP2500B (fuggle.veldy.net [64.1.117.28]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 927EBBA33; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:57:53 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <008e01c0b3ca$c16dfb30$3028680a@tgt.com> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: "E. Jordan Bojar" , References: <01Mar23.114238est.115398@gateway.intersys.com> <01Mar23.114812est.115464@gateway.intersys.com> Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:54:55 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Grab the files from a resent snapshot and install them. Grab everything under the src directory. There should be an install.sh file which will install the sources. CHECKSUM.MD5 scontrib.br scontrib.dp sgames.ak slibexec.inf ssys.ba install.sh scontrib.bs scontrib.dq sgames.inf srelease.aa ssys.bb sbase.aa scontrib.bt scontrib.dr sgnu.aa srelease.ab ssys.bc sbase.inf scontrib.bu scontrib.ds sgnu.ab srelease.ac ssys.bd sbin.aa scontrib.bv scontrib.dt sgnu.ac srelease.inf ssys.be sbin.ab scontrib.bw scontrib.du sgnu.ad ssbin.aa ssys.bf sbin.inf scontrib.bx scontrib.dv sgnu.ae ssbin.ab ssys.bg scontrib.aa scontrib.by scontrib.dw sgnu.af ssbin.ac ssys.bh scontrib.ab scontrib.bz scontrib.dx sgnu.ag ssbin.ad ssys.bi scontrib.ac scontrib.ca scontrib.dy sgnu.ah ssbin.inf ssys.bj scontrib.ad scontrib.cb scontrib.dz sgnu.ai sshare.aa ssys.bk scontrib.ae scontrib.cc scontrib.ea sgnu.aj sshare.ab ssys.bl scontrib.af scontrib.cd scontrib.eb sgnu.ak sshare.ac ssys.bm scontrib.ag scontrib.ce scontrib.ec sgnu.al sshare.ad ssys.bn scontrib.ah scontrib.cf scontrib.ed sgnu.inf sshare.ae ssys.bo scontrib.ai scontrib.cg scontrib.ee sinclude.aa sshare.af ssys.bp scontrib.aj scontrib.ch scontrib.ef sinclude.inf sshare.ag ssys.bq scontrib.ak scontrib.ci scontrib.eg slib.aa sshare.ah ssys.br scontrib.al scontrib.cj scontrib.eh slib.ab sshare.ai ssys.inf scontrib.am scontrib.ck scontrib.ei slib.ac sshare.aj stools.aa scontrib.an scontrib.cl scontrib.ej slib.ad sshare.ak stools.inf scontrib.ao scontrib.cm scontrib.ek slib.ae sshare.al subin.aa scontrib.ap scontrib.cn scontrib.el slib.af sshare.am subin.ab scontrib.aq scontrib.co scontrib.em slib.ag sshare.inf subin.ac scontrib.ar scontrib.cp scontrib.en slib.ah ssys.aa subin.ad scontrib.as scontrib.cq scontrib.eo slib.ai ssys.ab subin.ae scontrib.at scontrib.cr scontrib.ep slib.aj ssys.ac subin.af scontrib.au scontrib.cs scontrib.eq slib.ak ssys.ad subin.ag scontrib.av scontrib.ct scontrib.er slib.al ssys.ae subin.ah scontrib.aw scontrib.cu scontrib.es slib.am ssys.af subin.ai scontrib.ax scontrib.cv scontrib.et slib.an ssys.ag subin.aj scontrib.ay scontrib.cw scontrib.eu slib.ao ssys.ah subin.inf scontrib.az scontrib.cx scontrib.ev slib.ap ssys.ai susbin.aa scontrib.ba scontrib.cy scontrib.ew slib.aq ssys.aj susbin.ab scontrib.bb scontrib.cz scontrib.ex slib.ar ssys.ak susbin.ac scontrib.bc scontrib.da scontrib.ey slib.as ssys.al susbin.ad scontrib.bd scontrib.db scontrib.ez slib.at ssys.am susbin.ae scontrib.be scontrib.dc scontrib.inf slib.au ssys.an susbin.af scontrib.bf scontrib.dd setc.aa slib.av ssys.ao susbin.ag scontrib.bg scontrib.de setc.inf slib.aw ssys.ap susbin.ah scontrib.bh scontrib.df sgames.aa slib.ax ssys.aq susbin.ai scontrib.bi scontrib.dg sgames.ab slib.ay ssys.ar susbin.aj scontrib.bj scontrib.dh sgames.ac slib.az ssys.as susbin.ak scontrib.bk scontrib.di sgames.ad slib.ba ssys.at susbin.al scontrib.bl scontrib.dj sgames.ae slib.bb ssys.au susbin.inf scontrib.bm scontrib.dk sgames.af slib.bc ssys.av scontrib.bn scontrib.dl sgames.ag slib.bd ssys.aw scontrib.bo scontrib.dm sgames.ah slib.inf ssys.ax scontrib.bp scontrib.dn sgames.ai slibexec.aa ssys.ay scontrib.bq scontrib.do sgames.aj slibexec.ab ssys.az Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "E. Jordan Bojar" To: Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 10:46 AM Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source > Perhaps I should have given more detail. The reason I said 'without CTM or > CVSup' is that I'd like to download the -STABLE source from a fat-pipe > loaction without an availible FreeBSD box (ie onto a Windows client). From > there, I can burn an ISO/CD to grab /usr/src off of for my poor little > bandwidth-deprived boxen. Does this make sense? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Schulte" > To: "E. Jordan Bojar" ; > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 11:37 AM > Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source > > > > mv /usr/src /usr/src.old > > cvsup stable-supfile > > > > Then you'll have a new /usr/src from -STABLE > > > > At 11:33 AM 3/23/2001 -0500, E. Jordan Bojar wrote: > > >Is there a way for me to download the most recent -STABLE source and > apply > > >it to or replace the 4.2-RELEASE source without using CTM or CVSup? I'd > > >like to be able to burn the source onto a CD for bringing multiple > machines > > >up-to-date in a low-bandwidth enviornment. TIA. > > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 11:40:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E58137B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:39:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bandix@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NJjQU43581; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:45:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:45:25 -0500 (EST) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" To: Oliver Fromme Cc: Subject: Re: Revised schedule for 4.3-RELEASE In-Reply-To: <200103231823.TAA68365@lurza.secnetix.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Oliver Fromme wrote: >Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > > Which mirrors will carry the -RC ISO images? I've been trying to > >I'll _try_ to put 'em up at ftp7.de.freebsd.org, if I can. >No promises, though, 'cause I'm extremely busy. IIRC that's aliased to ftp.tu-clausthal.de, right? In that case will you be providing barebones 4.3 ISOs when the release is out? I've always loved those, since I can pull them down overnight even on a 56k dialup. What would be even better is if there was a barebones CD option that only contained the bindist and was even smaller. It would be useful to those of us who only install the bindist onto new machines and then CVSUP the latest sources immediately to install a fresh world. -- Brandon D. Valentine "Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example." -- Mark Twain, Pudd'nhead Wilson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 11:52:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A6437B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:52:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA08664; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:52:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200103231952.MAA08664@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Current source tree size. In-Reply-To: <025601c0b356$ee36c4e0$931576d8@inethouston.net> from "David W. Chapman Jr." at "Mar 22, 1 11:05:51 pm" To: dwcjr@inethouston.net (David W. Chapman Jr.) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:52:06 -0700 (MST) Cc: graywane@home.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com Organization: DCF, Inc. X-O/S: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-Unexpected: The Spanish Inquisition X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > While we're on the topic, I know cvsupd is easy on the bandwidth, > compared to how harsh it is on the server, but does anyone have a > current setup and an average number of users it can server at a time? I can't give you numbers, but I suspect it will be controlled mostly by how hot your disk system is. My server is a 200MHz PPro with SCSI fast/wide disks. Something like a "cvs -D :exe:chad@freeway:/BSDcvs/cvs update /usr/ports" flogs the server disk something fierce. CPU sits about 90% idle, and the "cvs server" sits in a wait I/O most the time. So, caching RAID controller vs an IDE drive will make almost all the difference. Don't worry too much about bandwidth (at least on a LAN) or CPU horsepower. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chad R. Larson" > To: "Graywane" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 9:42 PM > Subject: Re: Current source tree size. > > > As I recall, Graywane wrote: > > > How much disk space does the entire freebsd cvs repository require? > > > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/sd2s1e 1490111 1151090 219813 84% /BSDcvs > > > > -crl -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12: 8: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBED937B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:07:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA08793; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:07:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200103232007.NAA08793@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010323103552.02cec6a8@pop.schulte.org> from Christopher Schulte at "Mar 23, 1 10:37:22 am" To: christopher@schulte.org (Christopher Schulte) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:07:01 -0700 (MST) Cc: bojar@intersys.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com Organization: DCF, Inc. X-O/S: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-Unexpected: The Spanish Inquisition X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Christopher Schulte wrote: > mv /usr/src /usr/src.old > cvsup stable-supfile You missed the "without using CTM or CVSup" part of his question. A technically correct answer would be for him to use anonymous cvs, but I don't think that would address his issues either. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12:17:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441EE37B71E for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:17:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2NKHBs16971; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:17:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103232017.f2NKHBs16971@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: "Brett G. Lemoine" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:18:10 PST." <200103231618.IAA17819@blah.incyte.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:17:11 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >Well, crap. I'm still getting them with a kernel built from a >cvsup yesterday early afternoon. > >(da2:ahc1:0:6:0): SCB 0x3 - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x8 >STACK == 0x3, 0x110, 0x166, 0x0 >SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 >ahc1: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x8 >SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0x6, SSTAT0 0x0 >SCB count = 20 >Kernel NEXTQSCB = 4 >Card NEXTQSCB = 4 >QINFIFO entries: >Waiting Queue entries: >Disconnected Queue entries: 0:3 >QOUTFIFO entries: >Sequencer Free SCB List: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > 2 >2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 >Pending list: 3 >Kernel Free SCB list: 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 13 12 11 10 >Untagged Q(6): 3 >sg[0] - Addr 0xca3a900 : Length 8 >(da2:ahc1:0:6:0): Queuing a BDR SCB >(da2:ahc1:0:6:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent >(da2:ahc1:0:6:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34b >ahc1: Bus Device Reset on A:6. 1 SCBs aborted >da2 at ahc1 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 >da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device >da2: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) >da2: 1911MB (3915600 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 243C) This looks like a device issue. From what the controller can tell, the jaz drive never re-selects us after taking a command and disconnecting. >I'm also still getting the below messages anytime I try to use >the on-board ES1371 sound. Noisy bus I suppose. >What are the chances that these are unrelated? You might be able to figure that out with a PCI bus analyzer and a SCSI bus analyzer. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12:19:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E2637B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:19:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2NKIgp65297; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:18:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:18:41 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: "Robin P. Blanchard" Cc: Subject: Re: hacking installation... In-Reply-To: <3ABB89BF.F75D3775@gactr.uga.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You actually need MD_ROOT, not MFS_ROOT. -gordon On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: > Here's the snippet from my kernel config: > > options INET #InterNETworking > options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem > options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support > options MFS #Memory Filesystem > options MFS_ROOT > options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem > options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem > options PROCFS #Process filesystem > options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] > options SCSI_DELAY=5000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI > options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support > options UCONSOLE #Allow users to grab the console > options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor > options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor > options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory > options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues > options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores > options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions > options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING > options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev > > > However, using this kernel, the installer fails to load claiming I have > no kernel support for mfs as a root device. What am I doing wrong? > > Or, is there an easier way for me to install this 486 that doesn't require > me going about the hacked install method (the problem is that the aic driver > expects/detects the chip to be at IRQ 12 but it is at 11). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12:19:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6220F37B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:19:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2NKIos17000; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:19:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103232019.f2NKIos17000@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: netch@netch.kiev.ua Cc: Nick Slager , "Brett G. Lemoine" , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:45:40 +0200." <20010323164540.I93748@netch.kiev.ua> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:18:50 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> S80D is a firmware revision that should be avoided at all costs. >> Perhaps some of the performance improvements I've make recently >> exacerbate the issues with this firmware revision, but I've yet >> to be able to install on disks with that revision. My guess is >> that it is really da1 that is causing your problems. > >But it works stably with ahc driver code before Mar 12 (e.g., cvsup date >2001.03.11.12.00.00). >Are you sure that it shall work with code after Mar 20? All I'm saying is that using a drive with S80D firmware is like playing Russian Roulette with a mostly loaded gun. If you pull the trigger enough times, you'll shoot your face off. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12:39: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (ns.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA09337B71A; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:38:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from max@vic.sabbo.net) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.112]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f2NKcjX12431; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 22:38:45 +0200 Received: (from max@localhost) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.3/8.11.2) id f2NKcjr00532; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 22:38:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) From: Maxim Sobolev Message-Id: <200103232038.f2NKcjr00532@vic.sabbo.net> Subject: ppp(8) + ip forwarding doesn't work anymore To: brian@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 22:38:45 +0200 (EET) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I noticed that after upgrading to 4-BETA something goes wrong with ip forwarding via ppp(8). I have a FreeBSD box (A) connected to Internet via network interface and this system also has a modem for dial-in and backup dial-up connection. Sometimes I need to route through this modem traffic to/from only one specific host (B) on my internal network, so I used the following command to do it and it worked like a charm (50 is the first rule): ppp.linkup: !bg /sbin/ipfw add 50 fwd HISADDR ip from B to not 192.168.0.1/24 ppp.linkdown: !bg delete 50 After upgrading to 4-BETA and consequently to 4-RC this doesn't work anymore :(((. After a link is up I see this rule in my ipfw configuration, see route to HISADDR in routing table, can ping HISADDR from A, but all packets from B are silently discarded (I see count increase in `ipfw show', but ppp doesn't show any IP packets going through). At the same time, I can get all packets from B and other hosts routed through ppp by doing `route add default HISADDR' after link is up, so obviously my configuration is OK. I suspect that this has something to do with recent forwarding changes, but can't tell more precisely. It looks to me like a serious bug, that ought to be resolved before 4.3-RELEASE. -Maxim P.S. Yes, I have gateway_enable="YES" and "options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD" on A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12:42:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gactr.uga.edu (mail.gactr.uga.edu [128.192.37.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D03337B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:42:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Robin_Blanchard@gactr.uga.edu) Received: (qmail 7131 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2001 20:42:37 -0000 Received: from qat.noc.nat (HELO gactr.uga.edu) ([10.10.100.125]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.servers.nat (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Mar 2001 20:42:37 -0000 Message-ID: <3ABBB515.79859F15@gactr.uga.edu> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:41:57 -0500 From: "Robin P. Blanchard" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gordon Tetlow Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hacking installation... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I added MD_ROOT and get the same thing... it prompts me for a root device... > > You actually need MD_ROOT, not MFS_ROOT. > > > Here's the snippet from my kernel config: > > > > options INET #InterNETworking > > options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem > > options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support > > options MFS #Memory Filesystem > > options MFS_ROOT > > options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem > > options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem > > options PROCFS #Process filesystem > > options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] > > options SCSI_DELAY=5000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI > > options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support > > options UCONSOLE #Allow users to grab the console > > options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor > > options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor > > options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory > > options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues > > options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores > > options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions > > options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING > > options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev -- ------------------------------------ Robin P. Blanchard IT Program Specialist Georgia Center for Continuing Ed. fon: 706.542.2404 fax: 706.542.6546 email: Robin_Blanchard@gactr.uga.edu ------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12:44:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [209.247.77.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FACA37B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:44:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gordont@bluemtn.net) Received: from localhost (gordont@localhost) by sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (8.11.3/8.11.2/BMA1.1) with ESMTP id f2NKi1O69422; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:44:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:44:01 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow X-X-Sender: To: "Robin P. Blanchard" Cc: Subject: Re: hacking installation... In-Reply-To: <3ABBB515.79859F15@gactr.uga.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Did you alter /boot/loader.conf as well? On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: > I added MD_ROOT and get the same thing... > it prompts me for a root device... > > > > You actually need MD_ROOT, not MFS_ROOT. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12:45: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C6337B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:44:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA76344; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:44:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) From: Oliver Fromme Message-Id: <200103232044.VAA76344@lurza.secnetix.de> Subject: Re: Revised schedule for 4.3-RELEASE To: bandix@looksharp.net (Brandon D. Valentine) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:44:54 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Brandon D. Valentine" at Mar 23, 2001 02:45:25 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Oliver Fromme wrote: > >Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > > > Which mirrors will carry the -RC ISO images? I've been trying to > > > >I'll _try_ to put 'em up at ftp7.de.freebsd.org, if I can. > >No promises, though, 'cause I'm extremely busy. > > IIRC that's aliased to ftp.tu-clausthal.de, right? Right. > In that case will > you be providing barebones 4.3 ISOs when the release is out? Yes. > I've > always loved those, since I can pull them down overnight even on a 56k > dialup. That's why I create them. :) > What would be even better is if there was a barebones CD option > that only contained the bindist and was even smaller. There is one: -rw-rw-r-- 1 inof bsd 201242624 Dec 05 17:57 4.2-install.iso -rw-rw-r-- 1 inof bsd 191283200 Dec 05 19:58 4.2-livefs.iso -rw-rw-r-- 1 inof bsd 88379392 Dec 05 18:16 4.2-minimum.iso Well, OK, the "minimum" one contains a bit more than just "bin". It also contains the catpages, compat*, crypto, ports and the kernel sources, but no more. I thought that these are valuable enough to be included. These are the sizes (in Kbytes): 5469 catpages 557 compat1x 349 compat20 470 compat21 1211 compat22 1058 compat3x 10143 crypto 10787 ports 10428 src (kernel sources only) OK, so leaving those off would save about 40 Mbyte of those 88 Mbytes of the minimum ISO. Hm. Sounds like a good deal. I'll think about it. Regards Oliver PS: Please don't ignore my Reply-To's. They're there for a reason. I _do_ read the list, so there's not even need to Cc me. -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12:48:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from postal.incyte.com (postal.incyte.com [198.31.37.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5B437B72B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:48:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bl@incyte.com) Received: from blah.incyte.com (blah.incyte.com [10.99.1.40]) by postal.incyte.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NKm5500720; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:48:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from blah.incyte.com (bl@localhost) by blah.incyte.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA19814; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:48:07 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103232048.MAA19814@blah.incyte.com> X-Authentication-Warning: blah.incyte.com: bl owned process doing -bs To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:17:11 MST." <200103232017.f2NKHBs16971@aslan.scsiguy.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:48:06 -0800 From: "Brett G. Lemoine" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > >Well, crap. I'm still getting them with a kernel built from a > >cvsup yesterday early afternoon. > > > >(da2:ahc1:0:6:0): SCB 0x3 - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x8 > >STACK == 0x3, 0x110, 0x166, 0x0 > >SXFRCTL0 == 0x80 > >ahc1: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x8 > >SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0x6, SSTAT0 0x0 > >SCB count = 20 > >Kernel NEXTQSCB = 4 > >Card NEXTQSCB = 4 > >QINFIFO entries: > >Waiting Queue entries: > >Disconnected Queue entries: 0:3 > >QOUTFIFO entries: > >Sequencer Free SCB List: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > 21 > > 2 > >2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 > >Pending list: 3 > >Kernel Free SCB list: 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 13 12 11 10 > >Untagged Q(6): 3 > >sg[0] - Addr 0xca3a900 : Length 8 > >(da2:ahc1:0:6:0): Queuing a BDR SCB > >(da2:ahc1:0:6:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent > >(da2:ahc1:0:6:0): no longer in timeout, status = 34b > >ahc1: Bus Device Reset on A:6. 1 SCBs aborted > >da2 at ahc1 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 > >da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device > >da2: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) > >da2: 1911MB (3915600 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 243C) > > This looks like a device issue. From what the controller can tell, > the jaz drive never re-selects us after taking a command and disconnecting. I had the same errors on my root drive (SEAGATE ST318404LW) too, I just didn't get to capture it. > >I'm also still getting the below messages anytime I try to use > >the on-board ES1371 sound. > > Noisy bus I suppose. > > >What are the chances that these are unrelated? > > You might be able to figure that out with a PCI bus analyzer and > a SCSI bus analyzer. Well those are two items I've never seen, much less owned or know how to use. Any suggestions on where I should go from here? Any way to get additional information that might better pin down where the fault lies? I'm perfectly happy to jump through hoops to get this figured out, but I don't know what other info that I can get would be most useful. bl -- //====== Brett G. Lemoine -=- ===============================\\ || Info. Systems Architect | || ||Core Unix System Services| We have enough youth. || || Incyte Genomics | How about a fountain of SMART? || || Palo Alto, California | || |+-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+| \\== PGP Key Fingerprint: 68 A1 2A 2D 82 CE E9 70 5B 80 D1 11 EC F3 FB 85 ==// To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 12:51:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7189E37B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:51:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA76837; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:51:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:51:32 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200103232051.VAA76837@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source In-Reply-To: <01Mar23.113506est.115453@gateway.intersys.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.1-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG E. Jordan Bojar wrote: > Is there a way for me to download the most recent -STABLE source and apply > it to or replace the 4.2-RELEASE source without using CTM or CVSup? You could download the src-dist of the latest -stable snap- shot from one of the FTP servers. For example, try to ftp to releng4.freebsd.org and go to /pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.2-20010323-STABLE and down- load the complete "src" directory (use wget or a dedicated FTP mirror tool such as "omi"). There's an install script included (don't just blindly run it -- read it first!). Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 13:13: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0F537B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:13:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bandix@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NLIbP44460 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:18:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bandix@looksharp.net) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:18:37 -0500 (EST) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" To: Subject: Re: Revised schedule for 4.3-RELEASE In-Reply-To: <200103232044.VAA76344@lurza.secnetix.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Oliver Fromme wrote: >OK, so leaving those off would save about 40 Mbyte of those >88 Mbytes of the minimum ISO. Hm. Sounds like a good deal. >I'll think about it. That's all I can ask. =) >PS: Please don't ignore my Reply-To's. They're there for >a reason. I _do_ read the list, so there's not even need >to Cc me. My apologies then. The original message had no Reply-To: header so you got auto-cc'd. It didn't occur with this message since it did include the Reply-To. Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:23:26 +0100 (CET) From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Revised schedule for 4.3-RELEASE -- Brandon D. Valentine "Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example." -- Mark Twain, Pudd'nhead Wilson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 13:25:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE9737B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:25:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2NLP6s17840; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:25:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103232125.f2NLP6s17840@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: "Brett G. Lemoine" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:48:06 PST." <200103232048.MAA19814@blah.incyte.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:25:06 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> This looks like a device issue. From what the controller can tell, >> the jaz drive never re-selects us after taking a command and disconnecting. > >I had the same errors on my root drive (SEAGATE ST318404LW) too, I >just didn't get to capture it. I was only able to come to that conclusion by looking at all of the debugging output. It is hard to say that your problem was the same without having the full diagnostic output. >> You might be able to figure that out with a PCI bus analyzer and >> a SCSI bus analyzer. > >Well those are two items I've never seen, much less owned or know how to >use. Any suggestions on where I should go from here? Any way to get >additional information that might better pin down where the fault lies? If you can spare the system for a bit, you could ship it here and I could try to figure out what is wrong with it. I have both a PCI bus analyzer and a SCSI bus analyzer. Since the parity errors seem to coincide with sound output, I'm pretty sure that this is just broken hardware. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 14:29:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from c000.sfo.cp.net (c004-h007.c004.snv.cp.net [209.228.33.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 686D337B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:29:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from psglenn@uswestmail.net) Received: (cpmta 17221 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2001 14:29:13 -0800 Date: 23 Mar 2001 14:29:13 -0800 Message-ID: <20010323222913.17220.cpmta@c000.sfo.cp.net> X-Sent: 23 Mar 2001 22:29:13 GMT Received: from [64.40.46.6] by mail.uswestmail.net with HTTP; 23 Mar 2001 14:29:13 PST Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Mime-Version: 1.0 To: mckay@thehub.com.au From: psglenn@uswestmail.net Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Web Mail 3.7.1.9 Subject: Re: Problem with 4.2-STABLE and dc0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, the below patch did not work for some reason, but I inserted and deleted manually and that seemed to work. I have an FA310TX which has been working well except for the dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state messages. I'd like to help with this problem so let me know what else might help. My new dmesg is: Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.3-RC #1: Fri Mar 23 13:40:54 PST 2001 root@big.psf.his.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/BIG Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (367.50-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 Features=0x183f9ff real memory = 201326592 (196608K bytes) avail memory = 192372736 (187864K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc037a000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 10 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf irq 0 at device 15.0 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xdc80-0xdcbf,0xddc8-0xddcb,0xddd0-0xddd7,0xddf8-0xddfb,0xdde0-0xdde7 mem 0xdffc0000-0xdffdffff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0 ata2: at 0xdde0 on atapci1 ata3: at 0xddd0 on atapci1 dc0: <82c169 PNIC 10/100BaseTX> port 0xde00-0xdeff mem 0xdfffff00-0xdfffffff irq 9 at device 18.0 on pci0 dc0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:60:08:b6 miibus0: on dc0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 pcm0: at port 0x530-0x537,0x388-0x38f irq 11 drq 0 on isa0 ad0: 8223MB [16708/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 ad4: 19092MB [38792/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 acd0: CDROM at ata3-slave using PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a dc0 i=0 isr=0x2211104 dc0 i=0 isr=0x2211104 dc0 i=0 isr=0x2201100 Perry >I'd like anyone who is testing for the 4.3 release, who uses any of the >cards supported by the dc driver, and who has a bit of spare time, to >try this patch, and send me the results. When you get bored with the >diag output, just delete the obvious printf. >Stephen. --- if_dc.c.orig Tue Mar 6 22:41:17 2001 +++ if_dc.c Sun Mar 18 20:16:30 2001 @@ -1204,11 +1204,12 @@ for (i = 0; i < DC_TIMEOUT; i++) { isr = CSR_READ_4(sc, DC_ISR); - if (isr & DC_ISR_TX_IDLE && + if ((isr & DC_ISR_TX_IDLE || DC_IS_PNIC(sc)) && (isr & DC_ISR_RX_STATE) == DC_RXSTATE_STOPPED) break; DELAY(10); } + printf("dc%d: i=%d isr=0x%x\n", sc->dc_unit, i, isr); if (i == DC_TIMEOUT) printf("dc%d: failed to force tx and " To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message That's all for now. Signup for your free USWEST.mail Email account http://www.uswestmail.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 14:39:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E672337B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:39:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Received: from cfcl.com (cpe-24-221-169-54.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.169.54]) by idiom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA61762 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:39:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.168.205] (cerberus [192.168.168.205]) by cfcl.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NMeMV14197 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:40:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:29:18 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Rich Morin Subject: upgrading to bind-8.2.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just received a security notice about a really nasty worm that is using a hole in bind to infect Linux boxes. >Late last night, the SANS Institute (through its Global Incident >Analysis Center) uncovered a dangerous new worm that appears to be >spreading rapidly across the Internet. It scans the Internet looking >for Linux computers with a known vulnerability. It infects the >vulnerable machines, steals the password file (sending it to a >China.com site), installs other hacking tools, and forces the newly >infected machine to begin scanning the Internet looking for other >victims. > >Several experts from the security community worked through the night to >decompose the worm's code and engineer a utility to help you discover >if the Lion worm has affected your organization. > >Updates to this announcement will be posted at the SANS web site, >http://www.sans.org >... So, it seems like a Good Idea to upgrade my copy of bind (:-). I pulled down the port for bind-8.2.3-REL and it seems to build just fine. Before I install it, however, I thought I'd ask if anyone has run into installation and/or configuration issues. -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - home page, resume, etc. http://www.cfcl.com/Meta/md_fb.html - The FreeBSD Browser email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 14:43:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from roam.psg.com (roam.psg.com [147.28.4.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE86137B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:43:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from randy by roam.psg.com with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14gZx7-0005RV-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:22:37 -0600 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: vm Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:22:37 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG is there a cookbook for VMware under stable? randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 14:51:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D7E937B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:51:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 7689 invoked by uid 0); 23 Mar 2001 23:51:15 -0000 Received: from dsl1-160.dynacom.net (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2001 23:51:15 -0000 Message-ID: <3ABBD362.1BD7FD4@urx.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:51:14 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rich Morin Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: upgrading to bind-8.2.3 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Rich Morin wrote: > > I just received a security notice about a really nasty worm that is > using a hole in bind to infect Linux boxes. > > >Late last night, the SANS Institute (through its Global Incident > >Analysis Center) uncovered a dangerous new worm that appears to be > >spreading rapidly across the Internet. It scans the Internet looking > >for Linux computers with a known vulnerability. It infects the > >vulnerable machines, steals the password file (sending it to a > >China.com site), installs other hacking tools, and forces the newly > >infected machine to begin scanning the Internet looking for other > >victims. > > > >Several experts from the security community worked through the night to > >decompose the worm's code and engineer a utility to help you discover > >if the Lion worm has affected your organization. > > > >Updates to this announcement will be posted at the SANS web site, > >http://www.sans.org > >... > > So, it seems like a Good Idea to upgrade my copy of bind (:-). I > pulled down the port for bind-8.2.3-REL and it seems to build just > fine. Before I install it, however, I thought I'd ask if anyone > has run into installation and/or configuration issues. I thought that was what is already built into 4-stable right now. I did a named -v and 8.2.3-REL pops up. Kent > > -r > -- > http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - home page, resume, etc. > http://www.cfcl.com/Meta/md_fb.html - The FreeBSD Browser > email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 14:53:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E49F37B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:53:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2NMrP002878; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:53:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: bl@incyte.com Cc: gibbs@scsiguy.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: <200103232048.MAA19814@blah.incyte.com> References: <200103232017.f2NKHBs16971@aslan.scsiguy.com> <200103232048.MAA19814@blah.incyte.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010323145325J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:53:25 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 33 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm still getting the "Invalidating pack" error on my test system, using a 4.3-RC snapshot built from last night's CVS repository. One thing I've noticed, however, is that it only occurs when I'm using soft updates AND I'm installing across both drives on my test system. If I install to only one drive, or don't use soft updates, the problem does not manifest itself. I've tried this many times and that's about as best as I can "narrow" it down. The relevent dmesg bits from the affected system are: ahc0: port 0xb000-0xb0ff mem 0xdd800000-0xdd800fff irq 14 at device 6.0 on pci0 aic7890/91: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 16) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device da2: 20.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15) da2: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 8715MB (17850000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1111C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 8715MB (17850000 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1111C) Sorry I misidentified these drives as Quantums in my first failure report. They're clearly IBM drives. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 14:56:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8319537B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:56:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Received: from cfcl.com (cpe-24-221-169-54.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.169.54]) by idiom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA75259 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:56:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.168.205] (cerberus [192.168.168.205]) by cfcl.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NMvdV14445 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:57:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:46:39 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Rich Morin Subject: Re: upgrading to bind-8.2.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 2:51 PM -0800 3/23/01, Kent Stewart wrote: >I thought that was what is already built into 4-stable right now. I >did a named -v and 8.2.3-REL pops up. Sorry; I'm neglected to say that I'm running a (fairly vanilla) FreeBSD 4.2 release: % named -v named 8.2.3-T6B Mon Nov 20 11:27:49 GMT 2000 jkh@bento.FreeBSD.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - home page, resume, etc. http://www.cfcl.com/Meta/md_fb.html - The FreeBSD Browser email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 14:58:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.unixathome.org (ns1.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F71037B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:58:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (dan@wocker.int.nz.freebsd.org [192.168.0.99]) by ns1.unixathome.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2NMwUf06592; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:58:30 +1200 (NZST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Message-Id: <200103232258.f2NMwUf06592@ns1.unixathome.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: novice in training To: Rich Morin Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:58:29 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: upgrading to bind-8.2.3 Reply-To: dan@langille.org Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 23 Mar 2001, at 14:46, Rich Morin wrote: > At 2:51 PM -0800 3/23/01, Kent Stewart wrote: > >I thought that was what is already built into 4-stable right now. I > >did a named -v and 8.2.3-REL pops up. > > Sorry; I'm neglected to say that I'm running a (fairly vanilla) > FreeBSD 4.2 release: > > % named -v > named 8.2.3-T6B Mon Nov 20 11:27:49 GMT 2000 > jkh@bento.FreeBSD.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named I upgraded bind using the ports. Check the archives for instructions as to the make parameters to use. It might be in the security mailing list. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger dan@unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 14:59:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCA837B718 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:59:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cdf.lists@fxp.org) Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id E23CF1360C; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:59:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:59:31 -0500 From: Chris Faulhaber To: Rich Morin Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: upgrading to bind-8.2.3 Message-ID: <20010323175931.A4007@peitho.fxp.org> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber , Rich Morin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from rdm@cfcl.com on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 02:46:39PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 02:46:39PM -0800, Rich Morin wrote: > At 2:51 PM -0800 3/23/01, Kent Stewart wrote: > >I thought that was what is already built into 4-stable right now. I > >did a named -v and 8.2.3-REL pops up. >=20 > Sorry; I'm neglected to say that I'm running a (fairly vanilla) > FreeBSD 4.2 release: >=20 > % named -v > named 8.2.3-T6B Mon Nov 20 11:27:49 GMT 2000 > jkh@bento.FreeBSD.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named >=20 Which means you are quite vulnerable. A security advisory was issued almost two months ago covering this problem (which includes workarounds and solutions :) ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-01:18.bind.asc --=20 Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: FreeBSD: The Power To Serve iEYEARECAAYFAjq71VMACgkQObaG4P6BelBYSQCfZwSeRojFL7EO6EQQp2+SooM9 znwAn1NBKuDfsLLJ4TmTPOKV+IfPILZk =8RQW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 15: 2:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B96537B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:02:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: (qmail 8887 invoked by uid 0); 24 Mar 2001 00:02:17 -0000 Received: from dsl1-160.dynacom.net (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160) by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2001 00:02:17 -0000 Message-ID: <3ABBD5F8.E5371E75@urx.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:02:16 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rich Morin Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: upgrading to bind-8.2.3 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Rich Morin wrote: > > At 2:51 PM -0800 3/23/01, Kent Stewart wrote: > >I thought that was what is already built into 4-stable right now. I > >did a named -v and 8.2.3-REL pops up. > > Sorry; I'm neglected to say that I'm running a (fairly vanilla) > FreeBSD 4.2 release: > > % named -v > named 8.2.3-T6B Mon Nov 20 11:27:49 GMT 2000 > jkh@bento.FreeBSD.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named Well, my first thought was boom, boom both feet. I thought that was one of the primary reasons why people follow stable because problems like that are fixed when they show up. Kent > > -r > -- > http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - home page, resume, etc. > http://www.cfcl.com/Meta/md_fb.html - The FreeBSD Browser > email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 15:57:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9C337B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:57:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:5gLyiGGX+KCYbnMDWAOlRbRoLCbSGq/h@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2NNuq601634 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:56:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Message-Id: <200103232356.f2NNuq601634@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: tweten@nas.nasa.gov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) From: Dave Tweten Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 15:56:52 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As promised, I have rebuilt the kernel from sources cvsupped on Wednesday night, and the kernel buffer corruption I saw previously continues. After I built the kernel FreeBSD 4.3-RC (FLOATER) #2: Thu Mar 22 23:19:11 PST 2001 and installed it, I tried to buildworld again. As before, it stopped in "stage 4: building libraries." As before, the stopper was source file (/usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/setvbuf.c) corruption in kernel buffers by binary garbage. It started on a 1024-byte boundary (4096 bytes in) and extending for 1024 bytes. Again, the file itself was not corrupted. For review, Floater is an NEC Versa 6050MX with 48 megabytes of main memory and 2 4-Gig disk drives. A kernel I built on February 16 is the last one that doesn't exhibit buffer corruption. The problem has been consistent across a previous kernel config file and the current one. The previous config file fell victim to my blowing away all of /usr/src and re-cvsupping before I realized that the corruption wasn't on the disk. This explanation is by way of saying that the attached config file is a work in progress, but it couldn't have caused the identical buffer corruption observed with its predecessor. As a kicker, the previous config file was used to build the February 16 kernel that works. I'd call this a release show-stopper. # # FLOATER -- Floater.nas.nasa.gov configuration # machine i386 cpu I586_CPU ident FLOATER maxusers 64 #makeoptions DEBUG=-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options CD9660 #ISO 9660 filesystem options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU #Enable faster FPU exception handler options CPU_SUSP_HLT #Enables suspend on HALT options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep this!] options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE #Include this file in kernel options INET #InterNETworking options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols options IPSEC #IP security options IPSEC_ESP #IP security (crypto; define w/ IPSEC) options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV #Install a CDEV entry in /dev options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support options MFS #Memory Filesystem options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem options NFS #Network Filesystem options NFS_NOSERVER #Disable the NFS server code options NSWAPDEV=1 #Number of swap devices options PERFMON #Performance counter driver compiled options PPS_SYNC #Enable PLL for xntpd options PROCFS #Process filesystem options ROOTDEVNAME=\"ufs:ad0s1a\" options SHMMAXPGS=4096 #16 meg reputed to be required by Gimp options SOFTUPDATES #Speeds FS & makes abrupt shutdown safer options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory options UCONSOLE #Allow users to grab the console options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor device isa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 flags 0x1 device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 device vga0 at isa? # splash screen/screen saver pseudo-device splash # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100 # Floating point support - do not disable. device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 # Sound support device snd0 device sb0 at isa? port 0x220 irq 5 drq 1 device sbxvi0 at isa? drq 5 device sbmidi0 at isa? port 0x330 # Power management support device apm0 at nexus? flags 0x20 # PCCARD (PCMCIA) support device pcic0 at isa? irq 10 device card # Serial (COM) ports device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 irq 4 device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 device sio2 at isa? port IO_COM3 irq 9 # Parallel port device ppc0 at isa? irq 7 device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device ppi # Parallel port interface device # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocated. pseudo-device loop # Network loopback pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support pseudo-device pty 64 # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) -- M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377 We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 16:18:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from xena.gsicomp.on.ca (cr677933-a.ktchnr1.on.wave.home.com [24.43.230.149]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D8A37B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:18:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from hermes (hermes.gsicomp.on.ca [192.168.0.18]) by xena.gsicomp.on.ca (8.11.1/8.11.3) with SMTP id f2O0GX599827; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:16:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <007801c0b3f7$928026e0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matthew Emmerton" To: , References: <200103232356.f2NNuq601634@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:15:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > As promised, I have rebuilt the kernel from sources cvsupped on Wednesday > night, and the kernel buffer corruption I saw previously continues. > options CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU #Enable faster FPU exception handler > options CPU_SUSP_HLT #Enables suspend on HALT Have you tried a kernel without these CPU options? I know that the kernel uses FP registers to copy blocks of memory around, and am wondering if this "faster FPU exception handler" may be causing problems with that, leading to the in-kernel memory corruption that you indicate. -- Matt Emmerton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 16:32:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE2437B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:32:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:x23DrTK/xOJZ77GnbUxrBb7rfzvsLaFT@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2O0WI601820; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:32:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov) Message-Id: <200103240032.f2O0WI601820@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Matthew Emmerton" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) In-Reply-To: Message from "Matthew Emmerton" of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:15:44 EST." <007801c0b3f7$928026e0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:32:18 -0800 From: Dave Tweten Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Initially quoting me, matt@gsicomp.on.ca said: >>options CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU #Enable faster FPU exception handler >>options CPU_SUSP_HLT #Enables suspend on HALT >Have you tried a kernel without these CPU options? Immediately after sending my message, I commented out anything in the config file that seemed the least bit adventuresome, including the first option you mention. I just aborted the resulting build and will also comment out the second option before resuming. -- M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377 We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 16:39:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.lig.bellsouth.net (mail5.lig.bellsouth.net [205.152.0.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEB037B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:39:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank_s@bellsouth.net) Received: from Cat.nina.org (adsl-78-160-210.gnv.bellsouth.net [216.78.160.210]) by mail5.lig.bellsouth.net (3.3.5alt/0.75.2) with ESMTP id TAA16401; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:39:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:39:04 -0500 (EST) From: Frank Seltzer X-X-Sender: To: Matt Groener Cc: Subject: Re: Xircom Cardbus support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Matt Groener wrote: > > > > Thus spake Frank Seltzer (frank_s@bellsouth.net): > > > > > I just received a Dell Inspiron 4000 laptop with a Xircom Realport CardBus > > > Ethernet 10/100 + Modem 56 model # RBEM56G-100. > > I use both the Dell-supplied Xircom Carbus card of which you speak > and the 3com xl-based Cardbus card in my Latitude C600 without any major > issues, but I use 5.0-CURRENT. This in itself is a major issue, but as > long as "make buildworld" works with that day's CVS tree, I haven't had > problems. > > I also use packages install of XFree86 4.0.3 with only an occasional snag. > The Latitude C600 uses the ATI Rage Mobility 3 chipset. > > Checkout -mobile if you really want to keep up with a laptop. > > -matt I just installed the 20010320 -current snapshot and I still get an error: No card in database for "(null)"("(null)") Would you mind telling me what you did to get this card to work? Frank -- Only in America can a homeless veteran sleep in a cardboard box while a draft dodger sleeps in the White House - anonymous To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 16:52:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from republic.netfish.au.com (CPE-61-9-156-126.vic.bigpond.net.au [61.9.156.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD3537B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:52:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ngrundy@isoproplex.net) Received: from isoproplex.net (defiant.netfish.au.com [10.0.13.110]) by republic.netfish.au.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2O0p4w08041 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:51:06 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from ngrundy@isoproplex.net) Message-ID: <3ABBEF63.2E9E5979@isoproplex.net> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:50:43 +1100 From: Nick Grundy X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: network + hard disk issues in 4.3-beta ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all there seems to be a couple of problems i'm finding in 4.3 - beta the system is SMP > uname -a FreeBSD memoryprime.netfish.au.com 4.3-BETA FreeBSD 4.3-BETA #4: Thu Mar 22 08:30:38 EST 2001 ngrundy@memoryprime.netfish.au.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MEMORYPRIME i386 i get this on boot quite a bit on the console realtek 8139 chipset Mar 24 11:32:06 memoryprime /kernel: looutput: af=0 unexpected Mar 24 11:32:06 memoryprime dhclient: send_packet: Address family not supported by protocol family this is a serial console to a dec vt510 Mar 22 09:07:31 memoryprime getty[355]: getty exiting due to excessive running time there is also a problem with the system attempting to reset ataX after a error like adX read=0 the main contoler is Mar 21 20:14:29 memoryprime /kernel: atapci1: port 0xe000-0xe0ff,0xdc00-0xdc03,0xd800-0xd807 irq 11 at device 19.0 on pci0 with a intel BX controler as well with a single disk hanging off it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 17:25:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.venon.com (ns1.venon.com [64.7.7.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E56237B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:25:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from all@biosys.net) Received: from megalomaniac.biosys.net (megalomaniac.venon.com [64.7.7.82]) by ns1.venon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EB4D1613; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:23:25 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010323200654.00c506f0@64.7.7.83> X-Sender: alle@216.200.176.7 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:25:40 -0500 To: "Brent" , From: Asymmetric Subject: Re: ipfw rules ?? In-Reply-To: <004b01c0b3b0$894cc660$e32b82d0@cybertours.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:47 3/23/2001 -0500, Brent wrote: >i recently installed ipfw on my Freebsd 4.2 machine...with default to >ACCEPT...(i couldnt get the firewall rules to work correctly with default to >DENY on in the kernel) is there a place that has a good set of firewall >rules when using "default to DENY" in the kernel ??? I would say you can get basic functionality with just a few rules, and go from there.. this is similar to what I have. This assumes you have two network cards which for the sake of example I'll call ed0 and ed1. ed0 is your inside interface and has a subnet of 10.0.0.0/16. ed1 is your outside interface and has a subnet of 10.1.0.0/16. ; loopback traffic Rule 5000 : allow all from any to any via lo0 ; allow all traffic in from any connection you make that goes out. Rule 5000 : allow tcp from any to 10.0.0.0/16 established ; deny any traffic with a provably spoofed source address. Rule 5001 : deny all from 10.0.0.0/16 to any in ed1 ; allow all outgoing traffic except internal spoofing Rule 5002 : allow all from 10.0.0.0/16 to any in ed0 ; deny everything else Rule 65000 : deny all from any to any These rules are very basic and will not allow some sorts of connections through. You'll have to to open up incoming ports as you see fit for traffic from the outside world to connect to internal servers, and add other rules to support ICMP and UDP if you want pings (in either direction) to work, but I leave that as an exercise to you. One note on management.. I run a /28 subnet at home, and find it easiest if I break up the rules into manageable, logical blocks. In my setup, with ip's from XXX.XXX.XXX.YYY to XXX.XXX.XXX.ZZZ, I set up all my rules like this : YYYNN .. ZZZNN. So the IP 10.0.0.10 would be allocated rules 1000 - 1099. 10.0.0.21 would be allocated 2100 - 2199. Change the system to suit your situation, but you get the idea. It's a lot easier to do "ipfw show | grep 010" and get only the rules that apply to the .10 host than to pick through them line by line when you're trying to track down a problem. This gives you 100 rules per host which is more than enough for any sane network, and works well if you only have a small block to manage. YMMV. -------signature file------- PGP Key Fingerprint: 446B 7718 B219 9F1E 43DD 8E4A 6BE9 D739 CCC5 7FD7 "I don't think [Linux] will be very successful in the long run." "My experience and some of my friends' experience is that Linux is quite unreliable. Microsoft is really unreliable but Linux is worse." -Ken Thompson, Interview May 1999. http://www.freebsd.org FreeBSD - The Power to Serve http://www.rfnj.org Radio Free New Jersey - 445 streams - 40kbps @ 22khz Stereo http://namespace.org -- http://name.space Resist the ICANN! Support name.space! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 17:28:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750B537B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:28:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2O1S2V87488; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:28:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:28:02 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103240128.f2O1S2V87488@earth.backplane.com> To: Dave Tweten Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) References: <200103232356.f2NNuq601634@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : FreeBSD 4.3-RC (FLOATER) #2: Thu Mar 22 23:19:11 PST 2001 : :and installed it, I tried to buildworld again. As before, it stopped in :"stage 4: building libraries." As before, the stopper was source file :(/usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/setvbuf.c) corruption in kernel buffers by binary :garbage. It started on a 1024-byte boundary (4096 bytes in) and extending for :1024 bytes. Again, the file itself was not corrupted. : :For review, Floater is an NEC Versa 6050MX with 48 megabytes of main memory :and 2 4-Gig disk drives. A kernel I built on February 16 is the last one that :doesn't exhibit buffer corruption. The problem has been consistent across a :previous kernel config file and the current one. : :The previous config file fell victim to my blowing away all of /usr/src and :re-cvsupping before I realized that the corruption wasn't on the disk. This :explanation is by way of saying that the attached config file is a work in :progress, but it couldn't have caused the identical buffer corruption observed :with its predecessor. As a kicker, the previous config file was used to build :the February 16 kernel that works. : :I'd call this a release show-stopper. A bunch of questions: * Is the corruption in the same file every time you try the buildworld? * Is the corruption at the same offset/length? * How are you monitoring the corruption? ktrace? cat? vi? * How definitive a kernel -stable date can you lock the corruption down at? Judging from this and prior messages, somewhere between Feb16 and Mar1 ? * Do you have softupdates enabled? If so, try turning them off. * Are you using any special sysctl's ? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 17:37:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C38537B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:37:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2O1bkB87654; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:37:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:37:46 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103240137.f2O1bkB87654@earth.backplane.com> To: Dave Tweten , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) References: <200103232356.f2NNuq601634@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> <200103240128.f2O1S2V87488@earth.backplane.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG More questions: * Are you using any compiler optimizations when compiling the kernel? aka -O2 (typically found in /etc/make.conf or in the specific kernel configuration file). If so, just use -O. * Are you using any RAID/striping driver like vinum or ccd? * Are you using vn, mfs, or md? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18: 1:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E786037B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:01:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2O21tp87978; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:01:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:01:55 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103240201.f2O21tp87978@earth.backplane.com> To: Dave Tweten , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) References: <200103232356.f2NNuq601634@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> <200103240128.f2O1S2V87488@earth.backplane.com> <200103240137.f2O1bkB87654@earth.backplane.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG More questions #3 Can you test without any of the following kernel options? -Matt options CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU #Enable faster FPU exception handler options CPU_SUSP_HLT #Enables suspend on HALT options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols options IPSEC #IP security options IPSEC_ESP #IP security (crypto; define w/ IPSEC) options NFS_NOSERVER #Disable the NFS server code options NSWAPDEV=1 #Number of swap devices options PERFMON #Performance counter driver compiled options PPS_SYNC #Enable PLL for xntpd options ROOTDEVNAME=\"ufs:ad0s1a\" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18: 8:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF8937B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:08:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:j/ABZ5GNYPnVSHi8Osiqf0qo2LkC7fj5@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2O28G602193; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:08:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov) Message-Id: <200103240208.f2O28G602193@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Matt Dillon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) In-Reply-To: Message from Matt Dillon of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:28:02 PST." <200103240128.f2O1S2V87488@earth.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:08:16 -0800 From: Dave Tweten Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG dillon@earth.backplane.com said: > A bunch of questions: > * Is the corruption in the same file every time you try the buildworld? That depends. If I reboot the machine to create a controlled set of conditions and immediately do a buildworld, then yes, it seems to strike the same file at the same offset every time. If I cvsup some more updates first, or start the buildworld after the machine has been doing other random stuff, then no, it strikes various files, but always while at "stage 4: building libraries," according to the world.log file I capture. > * Is the corruption at the same offset/length? No/yes. The corruption always starts at a multiple of 1024 bytes into the file, and is always 1024 bytes long. The offset's actual multiple of 1024 varies, but has not yet been 0. > * How are you monitoring the corruption? ktrace? cat? vi? When the buildworld croaks, I track down the file from information in world.log and look at it with emacs. Interestingly, the corruption always has a "look" to it. The first few bytes of corruption in a recent example looked in emacs like \244\201^A^@^@^@^@^@\377 and so forth. The corruption is always rich in "^@" which I think is Emacs for ASCII NUL. > * How definitive a kernel -stable date can you lock the corruption > down at? Judging from this and prior messages, somewhere between > Feb16 and Mar1 ? Unfortunately, that's the best I can do. My newly installed automatic weekly cvsup-buildworld-buildkernel failed a couple of consecutive weekends before I became convinced that it wasn't just a transient in STABLE or an error on my part causing real corruption in /usr/src. > * Do you have softupdates enabled? If so, try turning them off. I didn't in the previous config file. That file had remained utterly unchanged for months. I did have it enabled in my work-in-progress config file I used for the just-previous test. I'm currently building again with that and anything else that strikes me as the least bit adventuresome commented out. > * Are you using any special sysctl's ? No. Incidently, thanks for stepping up. -- M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377 We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:12:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5D237B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:12:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:JXw8VcLAZmRR4hiAhhAbyS93aAHcSCBW@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2O2CV602215; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:12:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov) Message-Id: <200103240212.f2O2CV602215@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Matt Dillon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) In-Reply-To: Message from Matt Dillon of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:37:46 PST." <200103240137.f2O1bkB87654@earth.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:12:31 -0800 From: Dave Tweten Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG dillon@earth.backplane.com said: > * Are you using any compiler optimizations when compiling the kernel? > aka -O2 (typically found in /etc/make.conf or in the specifickernel > configuration file). If so, just use -O. Just using -O. > * Are you using any RAID/striping driver like vinum or ccd? No. > * Are you using vn, mfs, or md? I've been using mfs since FreeBSD was 386BSD, but otherwise, no. -- M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377 We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:20:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1947337B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:20:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2O2KWZ89481; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:20:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:20:32 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103240220.f2O2KWZ89481@earth.backplane.com> To: Dave Tweten Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) References: <200103240208.f2O28G602193@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :> * Is the corruption in the same file every time you try the buildworld? : :That depends. If I reboot the machine to create a controlled set of :conditions and immediately do a buildworld, then yes, it seems to strike the :same file at the same offset every time. If I cvsup some more updates first, :or start the buildworld after the machine has been doing other random stuff, :then no, it strikes various files, but always while at "stage 4: building :libraries," according to the world.log file I capture. A hexdump of that reproducably corrupted file would be invaluable. Is the contents of the corruption the same every time (in the reboot/buildworld case) or different? :> * Is the corruption at the same offset/length? : :No/yes. The corruption always starts at a multiple of 1024 bytes into the :file, and is always 1024 bytes long. The offset's actual multiple of 1024 :varies, but has not yet been 0. Is it always at or near the end of a file (within the last 8K) or sometimes in the middle? Large files sometimes or only small files? :> * How are you monitoring the corruption? ktrace? cat? vi? : :When the buildworld croaks, I track down the file from information in :world.log and look at it with emacs. Interestingly, the corruption always has :a "look" to it. The first few bytes of corruption in a recent example looked :in emacs like : : \244\201^A^@^@^@^@^@\377 : :and so forth. The corruption is always rich in "^@" which I think is Emacs :for ASCII NUL. Yah. :> * How definitive a kernel -stable date can you lock the corruption :> down at? Judging from this and prior messages, somewhere between :> Feb16 and Mar1 ? : :Unfortunately, that's the best I can do. My newly installed automatic weekly :cvsup-buildworld-buildkernel failed a couple of consecutive weekends before I :became convinced that it wasn't just a transient in STABLE or an error on my :part causing real corruption in /usr/src. This is extremely helpful. It limits the scope to commits made on the 16th and for the week following the 16th. :> * Do you have softupdates enabled? If so, try turning them off. : :I didn't in the previous config file. That file had remained utterly That is also extremely helpful. It means softupdates is almost certainly not responsible for the problem, which greatly reduces the amount of code I have to go through :-) :Incidently, thanks for stepping up. :-- :M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov :NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 Repeatable corruption is the holy grail of kernel debugging. A couple of us have been tearing our hair out tring to track down a filesystem corruption case that has been occuring very inoften for months. We've fixed a number of things, but weird things still occur occassionally. I'm hoping that the corruption you are able to reproduce is due to a kernel bug and not due to something else. Strange hope, eh? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:21:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280FC37B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:21:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:NFWvQoplH/pWmETJdpt68bbdM7Fe1S3y@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2O2L7602272; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:21:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov) Message-Id: <200103240221.f2O2L7602272@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Matt Dillon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) In-Reply-To: Message from Matt Dillon of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:01:55 PST." <200103240201.f2O21tp87978@earth.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:21:07 -0800 From: Dave Tweten Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG dillon@earth.backplane.com said: > Can you test without any of the following kernel options? [deleted] I've commented them all out, as well as options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE #Include this file in kernel options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV #Install a CDEV entry in /dev Incidently, I'm certain that the config file that produced my working February 16 kernel included: options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols options NFS_NOSERVER #Disable the NFS server code for whatever that may be worth. -- M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377 We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:23:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52F7E37B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:23:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Harald.Schmalzbauer@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 15432 invoked by uid 0); 24 Mar 2001 02:23:10 -0000 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 03:23:10 +0100 (MET) From: Harald Schmalzbauer To: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Strange crash X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000301138@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [212.63.129.190] Message-ID: <11967.985400590@www26.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, The alternate system clock has died! Reverting to ``pigs'' display. I've never seen this before and I don't have any idea what this could be. I've been making tests with a HPT370 controller in a ASUS CUR-DLS and connected four 80GB dirves. I had some irregularities before, so I recofigured the HPT370 RAID0 to ad0,1,2,3 and wrote a 100GB file to ar0. No problems so far (45MB/s) Then I read that file to /dev/null and suddenly (after 15 min) I saw that message without any previous error and the machine rebooted. Has anyone an idea what this could be? Not to forgert to mention: It's 4.3-rc from today. If anybody needs further info please let me know! Thank you, -Harry mailto: h.schmalzbauer@belenus.com -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:29: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848D637B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:29:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2O2Sow90668; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:28:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:28:50 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103240228.f2O2Sow90668@earth.backplane.com> To: Dave Tweten Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) References: <200103240221.f2O2L7602272@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Incidently, I'm certain that the config file that produced my working February :16 kernel included: : :options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols :options NFS_NOSERVER #Disable the NFS server code : :for whatever that may be worth. :-- :M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov :NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 I personally don't think NFS_NOSERVER could be the cause, but it's worth taking out since very few people use it (so a bug wouldn't be obvious to the larger community). But INET6 involves a huge amount of code that was recently modified. Being able to discount (or focus in on) that would be a big help. The others are also not probable causes, but worth removing to try to get to as standard a base kernel as possible. e.g. I don't know anyone who sets NSWAPDEV to 1, which is a degenerate case for the swap striping code. -Matt :Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377 :We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us. : : : :To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org :with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message : To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:33:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAED537B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:33:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oberman@ptavv.es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f2O2Vxc26437; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:31:59 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103240231.f2O2Vxc26437@ptavv.es.net> To: Frank Seltzer Cc: Matt Groener , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Xircom Cardbus support In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:39:04 EST." Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:31:58 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Frank, Once again, mobile would be a better place to send this. I'm not currently running -current, so my advice is suspect. Folks on mobile are running current and I'd take their advice over mine. To make CardBus work in -current, you must use NEWCARD. I believe there is a man page that explains how to use NEWCARD. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:42: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E480E37B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:41:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2O2fh003697; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:41:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: Harald.Schmalzbauer@gmx.de Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Strange crash In-Reply-To: <11967.985400590@www26.gmx.net> References: <11967.985400590@www26.gmx.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010323184143D.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:41:43 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 9 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The alternate system clock has died! > Reverting to ``pigs'' display. You say this is a crash? Where, on the system console? It looks more to me like this is something top(1) would say, but you say "crash" and also don't mention top(1) anywhere in this mail so I'm just guessing here. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:44:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3889537B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:44:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA10208; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:44:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200103240244.TAA10208@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Strange crash In-Reply-To: <20010323184143D.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> from Jordan Hubbard at "Mar 23, 1 06:41:43 pm" To: jkh@osd.bsdi.com (Jordan Hubbard) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:44:26 -0700 (MST) Cc: Harald.Schmalzbauer@gmx.de, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com Organization: DCF, Inc. X-O/S: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-Unexpected: The Spanish Inquisition X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Jordan Hubbard wrote: >> The alternate system clock has died! >> Reverting to ``pigs'' display. > > You say this is a crash? Where, on the system console? It looks more > to me like this is something top(1) would say, but you say "crash" and > also don't mention top(1) anywhere in this mail so I'm just guessing > here. Pigs is an "systat"-ism, though it might have been adopted by some other programs. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:48:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nyc.rr.com (nycsmtp2fb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.99.78]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207DE37B71A for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:48:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jslivko@nyc.rr.com) Received: from darkstar ([24.29.134.4]) by nyc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35); Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:50:58 -0500 Message-ID: <000701c0b40d$a40fb040$01000001@darkstar> From: "Jonathan M. Slivko" To: , "Jordan Hubbard" Cc: , References: <200103240244.TAA10208@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Strange crash Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:53:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On a related note, I was just wondering, is it possible to remotely kill an X session via kill -9 and not have to reboot the system afterwards because the box froze up? This happened on a 4.2-RELEASE machine, just installed with the latest release as of 3/20/2001. Just wondered if there is any fix or way around that, in the event that X screws up to the point that you just have to log in on another terminal and kill -9 it. However, I don't have any logs or anything to show pertinent to this situation, just my memory of the incident. - -- Jonathan M. Slivko - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad R. Larson" To: "Jordan Hubbard" Cc: ; Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 9:44 PM Subject: Re: Strange crash > As I recall, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > >> The alternate system clock has died! > >> Reverting to ``pigs'' display. > > > > You say this is a crash? Where, on the system console? It looks > > more to me like this is something top(1) would say, but you say > > "crash" and also don't mention top(1) anywhere in this mail so > > I'm just guessing here. > > Pigs is an "systat"-ism, though it might have been adopted by some > other programs. > > -crl > -- > Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? > chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com > DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBOrwMNRrszcjsacd7EQL1xACgl03Vri5/kNn2EFR4a//MbY95kE8AmwRj fjzcn7C2mo758QKP1bN68O5e =g14Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:49:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5584237B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:49:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:HOzf3W9N3Klcs9udEl/5E0ARlOzZZv9I@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2O2ng602441; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:49:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov) Message-Id: <200103240249.f2O2ng602441@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Matt Dillon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) In-Reply-To: Message from Matt Dillon of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:20:32 PST." <200103240220.f2O2KWZ89481@earth.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:49:42 -0800 From: Dave Tweten Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG dillon@earth.backplane.com said: > A hexdump of that reproducably corrupted file would be invaluable. Is > the contents of the corruption the same every time (in the > reboot/buildworld case) or different? Sorry, but I can't help you right now. I'm in the throws of rebuilding current world with my February 16 kernel to bring my utilities from February 16 to today. After I spend an hour or so getting some breakfast, I'll come back and try to answer this question. > Is it always at or near the end of a file (within the last 8K) or > sometimes in the middle? Large files sometimes or only small files? I found it in the middle (though closer to the end) once and at the end of short files (< 10K) the other times. -- M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377 We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 18:55: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.lig.bellsouth.net (mail2.lig.bellsouth.net [205.152.0.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7626037B71D for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:55:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank_s@bellsouth.net) Received: from Cat.nina.org (adsl-78-160-210.gnv.bellsouth.net [216.78.160.210]) by mail2.lig.bellsouth.net (3.3.5alt/0.75.2) with ESMTP id VAA06277; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:54:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:53:39 -0500 (EST) From: Frank Seltzer X-X-Sender: To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Matt Groener , Subject: Re: Xircom Cardbus support In-Reply-To: <200103240231.f2O2Vxc26437@ptavv.es.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Frank, > > Once again, mobile would be a better place to send this. I'm not > currently running -current, so my advice is suspect. Folks on mobile > are running current and I'd take their advice over mine. > > To make CardBus work in -current, you must use NEWCARD. I believe > there is a man page that explains how to use NEWCARD. > > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 I have no doubt you are correct but I was responding to Matt who said (on this list) that he has it working. Frank -- Only in America can a homeless veteran sleep in a cardboard box while a draft dodger sleeps in the White House - anonymous To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 19:43: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail4.kscable.com (fe4.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086F037B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:43:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rklosh@rkl.org) Received: from localhost ([65.26.173.69]) by mail4.kscable.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:40:09 -0600 To: randy@psg.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vm In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on XEmacs 21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010323214334G.rklosh@rkl.org> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:43:34 -0600 From: Ryan K.Losh X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 16 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello: randy> is there a cookbook for VMware under stable? randy> Here's how I got VMware running under stable. A few times (when building a new kernel/world) I've had to remove, and re "make install" VMware. Once having the old modules with the new kernel prevented the kernel from booting. # cd /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2 # make install Ryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 19:57: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBB037B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:57:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oberman@ptavv.es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f2O3v0c27492; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:57:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103240357.f2O3v0c27492@ptavv.es.net> To: Randy Bush Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: vm In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:22:37 CST." Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:57:00 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Randy, Marc Fonvielle wrote a nice cookbook type article at http://www.freebsdzine.org/200102/vmware2.php3. He chose to not use a netgraph bridge and I think that's a better way to go, but it does cover most of the steps to get vmware2 running and installing Windows 98 as a client system. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 20: 9:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from astral.isec.com.br (astral.isec.com.br [200.254.79.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C14737B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:09:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from duwde@duwde.com.br) Received: (qmail 457 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2001 04:07:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.isec.com.br (HELO duwde.com.br) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.isec.com.br with SMTP; 24 Mar 2001 04:07:45 -0000 Message-ID: <3ABC1CE3.F9486F2D@duwde.com.br> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 01:04:52 -0300 From: "Duwde (Fabio V. Dias)" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: sshd revealing too much stuff. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi. (PLEASE REPLY TO MY MAIL AS WELL, I'M NOT SUBSCRIBED) As of 2001/03/22 we have the following : cat /usr/src/crypto/openssh/version.h -- /* $FreeBSD: src/crypto/openssh/version.h,v 1.1.1.1.2.4 2001/03/22 00:30:56 green Exp $ */ /* $OpenBSD: version.h,v 1.13 2000/10/16 09:38:45 djm Exp $ */ #define SSH_VERSION "OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321" -- And sshd prints the complete SSH_VERSION to anyone. -- telnet somewhere.running.latest.stable Connected to somewhere.running.latest.stable. Escape character is '^]'. SSH-1.5-OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321 -- Why this "green@FreeBSD.org 20010321" has been added ? With that, there is no need for OS Fingerprinting. You've got the OS that the host is running AND its sshd EXACT date of last modification by freebsd team. My 0.1 cent... -- Fabio Vilan Dias / Duwde PGP key @ http://www.duwde.com.br/duwdepgp.asc FP = BB35 50F2 7F83 655D 6B11 F0A2 F8E2 FF3D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 20:36:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-43.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4D837B719 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:36:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C008466C3B; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:36:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:36:43 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Duwde (Fabio V. Dias)" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd revealing too much stuff. Message-ID: <20010323203643.A28772@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3ABC1CE3.F9486F2D@duwde.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3ABC1CE3.F9486F2D@duwde.com.br>; from duwde@duwde.com.br on Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:04:52AM -0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 01:04:52AM -0300, Duwde (Fabio V. Dias) wrote: > Why this "green@FreeBSD.org 20010321" has been added ? To indicate that it's not stock OpenSSH 2.3.0 and therefore doesn't have the security problems which the stock OpenSSH 2.3.0 has. > With that, there is no need for OS Fingerprinting. > You've got the OS that the host is running AND > its sshd EXACT date of last modification by freebsd team. Sorry, but I find it difficult to consider this a problem..OS fingerprinting is trivial in so many ways. Kris --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6vCRbWry0BWjoQKURAqfnAJ4vQU+rpykl21jNFxYSbvE/rNs4KgCgnjbV GcjDvHS8Ef05HmzNoqPr3e0= =80PU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 21:38:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server.highperformance.net (ip30.gte4.rb1.bel.nwlink.com [209.20.215.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42A637B71B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:38:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcwells@highperformance.net) Received: from localhost (jcw@localhost) by server.highperformance.net (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2O5cEN20990; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:38:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcwells@highperformance.net) X-Authentication-Warning: server.highperformance.net: jcw owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:38:13 -0800 (PST) From: "Jason C. Wells" X-Sender: jcw@server.highperformance.net To: "Duwde (Fabio V. Dias)" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd revealing too much stuff. In-Reply-To: <3ABC1CE3.F9486F2D@duwde.com.br> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Duwde (Fabio V. Dias) wrote: > telnet somewhere.running.latest.stable > > Connected to somewhere.running.latest.stable. This super secret place wouldn't happen to be: Received: from astral.isec.com.br (astral.isec.com.br [200.254.79.62]) Which also happens to a be a webserver, mail server, and name server. Well... is this a fingerprint? X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386) Mr. Kennaway was right. It was pretty trivial to fingerprint a system on the net. HTH, Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 23 22:13:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.185.254.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 290C737B71E for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 22:13:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 10972 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2001 06:13:04 -0000 Received: from j40.jrc26.jaring.my (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (161.142.126.234) by ns2.alphaque.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2001 06:13:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (egp52z@localhost.alphaque.com [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2O69ls01244; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:09:47 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:09:47 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: "E. Jordan Bojar" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Applying -STABLE source In-Reply-To: <01Mar23.113506est.115453@gateway.intersys.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, E. Jordan Bojar wrote: > like to be able to burn the source onto a CD for bringing multiple machines > up-to-date in a low-bandwidth enviornment. TIA. you dont even need the source. see a recent freebsddiary article on building world on a fast box once, and then installing world on multiple boxes. --dinesh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 4:19:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts8.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B726137B71D for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 04:19:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rtarrant@sympatico.ca) Received: from sympatico.ca ([206.172.235.78]) by tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id <20010324121923.QXSD22656.tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net@sympatico.ca> for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 07:19:23 -0500 Message-ID: <3ABC8FD9.84EB0E24@sympatico.ca> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 07:15:21 -0500 From: Ron Tarrant Organization: Computerman Internet Services X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Join Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Please add me to the mailing list. Thanks. Ron Tarrant rtarrant@sympatico.ca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 5:12:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9F337B71A for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:12:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stolz@I2.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE) Received: from r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (relay2.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.1]) by r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.11.3/8.11.3-2) with ESMTP id f2ODCUo19825 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:12:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from hyperion.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (hyperion.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.112.212]) by r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.11.3/8.11.3/3) with ESMTP id f2ODCU419817 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:12:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (agamemnon.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.194.74]) by hyperion.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1/2) with ESMTP id OAA19118 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:09:41 +0100 (MET) Received: (from stolz@localhost) by agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1-gb-2) id OAA14651 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:12:28 +0100 (MET) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:12:28 +0100 From: Volker Stolz To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.3-BETA: make kernel -j N broken Message-ID: <20010324141228.A14647@agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The subject almost says it all. I havenīt been able to succesfully get a kernel this way. Make would stop somewhere in between. First making buildkernel with -j N and then making installkernel w/o -j will work, though. Regards, Volker -- \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}! Volker Stolz * stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de * PGP + S/MIME To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 7:16:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39BF37B71B for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 07:16:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2OFG3s26048; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:16:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103241516.f2OFG3s26048@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: bl@incyte.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:53:25 PST." <20010323145325J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:16:03 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >I'm still getting the "Invalidating pack" error on my test system, >using a 4.3-RC snapshot built from last night's CVS repository. I still need all of the messages displayed by the driver in order to help here. I'm sure if you install via a serial console, you'll be able to capture them. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 7:45:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from c007.snv.cp.net (c007-h000.c007.snv.cp.net [209.228.33.206]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D22D937B71A for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 07:45:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from otterr@telocity.com) Received: (cpmta 19493 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2001 07:45:30 -0800 Received: from dsl-216-227-91-85.telocity.com (HELO zoso) (216.227.91.85) by smtp.telocity.com (209.228.33.206) with SMTP; 24 Mar 2001 07:45:30 -0800 X-Sent: 24 Mar 2001 15:45:30 GMT From: "Otter" To: "FreeBSD-questions (E-mail)" , "FreeBSD-stable (E-mail)" Subject: FreeBSD 2.2.7 available this weekend Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:37:04 -0500 Message-ID: <000801c0b478$47630200$1401a8c0@zoso> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Since the 2.2.x branch isn't on the -RELEASE ftp mirrors anymore, and as a favor to someone looking for 2.2.x, I've put up a copy of my old 2.2.7 CD from Cheapbytes. It isn't a fast site (only 256k upstream), but it's good for anyone doing an FTP install. It's only on the FTP until Monday morning (EST), at which time, it goes back to business as usual. As far as I know, cvsup sources are still available for 2.2.8-STABLE by using the tag RELENG_2 at your favorite mirror... correct me if I'm wrong. Anyone needing copies of this CD can email me directly. Until Monday, try ftp://bsdroxs.myip.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/2.2.7-RELEASE/ -Otter otterrATtelocityDOTcom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 8:59:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server1.wallnet.com (server1.wallnet.com [208.225.162.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F2937B71D for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:59:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from timothyk@server1.wallnet.com) Received: from localhost (timothyk@localhost) by server1.wallnet.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id LAA00444; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:56:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:56:01 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Kellers To: kellers@njit.edu Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: DNS blues after 4.3RC/1.3 upgrade In-Reply-To: <200103241516.f2OFG3s26048@aslan.scsiguy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My FreeBSD box lives behind an Apple Airport Base Station that provides both DHCP and NAT to my wireless network and my BSD box. While 4.3 RC was building, I decided to upgrade the Airport software to v 1.3 (from v1.2). Unfortunately, now I have a problem, and I did the boneheaded thing of making 2 upgrades at the same time and I don't know which or what is responible. From the wireless network, all appears fine. I can access the internet via IP or hostname addresses. But now, from the FreeBSD box, I can only ping the outside world via IP addresses. Pinging using a site's FQDN, gets no response at all --it just sits one line below the "ping steelman.org" prompt until I get frustrated and ^C out of it. The Macs on the wireless network all have "real' nameserver addresses in their TCP/IP control panel (24.3.196.33, 24.3 196.34), but in /stand/sysinstall's network interface configuration (via dhcp) the nameserver address defaults to 10.0.1.1 which is the same address as the gateway. Is there someother place I can enter an alternate nameserver address for the FreeBSD box? Or perhaps, is there something much more fundamental I am missing. BTW, before the upgrade of both the Airport and FreeBSD, internet connectivity worked fine. I'd sometimes get /kernel arp errors that complained that the dialup address of the Airport Base Station wasn't on the local network, but it didn't impact internetwork access. Any ideas? Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 9: 7:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from clever.visp-europe.psi.com (clever.visp-europe.psi.com [212.222.105.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B63B37B71A for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 09:07:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from ns09-n66-248.de.inter.net ([213.73.66.248] helo=mscu.best-eng.de) by clever.visp-europe.psi.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14grVZ-0007OB-00; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 18:07:21 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 18:07:20 +0100 (CET) Reply-To: Matthias Schuendehuette Organization: Private site running FreeBSD From: Matthias Schuendehuette To: jkh@osd.bsdi.com Subject: RELNOTES.TXT Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Jordan, just a moment ago, I stumbled (again) over an error in your RELNOTES.TXT: --- RELNOTES.TXT Sat Mar 24 12:09:13 2001 +++ RELNOTES_NEW.TXT Sat Mar 24 17:50:22 2001 @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ The "make buildkernel" procedure has changed slightly. It now gets the name of the configuration(s) to build from the KERNCONF variable (KERNEL is still valid, but deprecated). The installed kernel name -can be changed with the INSTKERNEL variable. The NO_KERNELCLEAN +can be changed with the INSTKERNNAME variable. The NO_KERNELCLEAN variable prevents cleaning of the kernel build directory (which is now done via "make clean", rather than "config -r"). This is valid at least for my 'Makefile.inc1' with the tag: # $FreeBSD: src/Makefile.inc1,v 1.141.2.26 2001/03/05 13:08:30 ru Exp $ This is a bit annoying because I tend to rebuild 'kernel.GENERIC' at the same time when I update 'kernel' - seems to be good practice for me... And a 2nd point on RELNOTES.TXT: Why don't you mention the COMPAQ SmartRAID Controllers neither in RELNOTES.TXT nor in HARDWARE.TXT? They're working fine... ;-) ---------------------------------- Matthias Schuendehuette Solmsstrasse 44 Date: 24-Mar-01 D-10961 Berlin Time: 17:54:20 This message was sent by XFMail + FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 9:43:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ece.cmu.edu (ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.236.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C7E37B718 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 09:43:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: from pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu (ANNEX-5.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.136.5]) (authenticated) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f2OHdfr04358; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:39:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:39:38 -0500 From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" To: Tim Kellers , kellers@njit.edu Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DNS blues after 4.3RC/1.3 upgrade Message-ID: <102860000.985455578@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Saturday, March 24, 2001 11:56:01 -0500, Tim Kellers wrote: +----- | their TCP/IP control panel (24.3.196.33, 24.3 196.34), but in | /stand/sysinstall's network interface configuration (via dhcp) the | nameserver address defaults to 10.0.1.1 which is the same address as the | gateway. +--->8 Some people here have complained about the new AirPort firmware doing that, so I think you can rule out FreeBSD as the cause. -- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 10:29:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C982C37B71D; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:29:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA15068; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:29:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200103241829.LAA15068@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.2.7 available this weekend In-Reply-To: <000801c0b478$47630200$1401a8c0@zoso> from Otter at "Mar 24, 1 10:37:04 am" To: otterr@telocity.com (Otter) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:29:01 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com Organization: DCF, Inc. X-O/S: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-Unexpected: The Spanish Inquisition X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Otter wrote: > As far as I know, cvsup sources are still available for > 2.2.8-STABLE by using the tag RELENG_2 at your favorite mirror... That's "RELENG_2_2". -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 10:39:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CCC37B71B for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:39:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from randy by rip.psg.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14gswf-000Pz7-00; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:39:25 -0800 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Kevin Oberman" Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: vm References: <200103240357.f2O3v0c27492@ptavv.es.net> Message-Id: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:39:25 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > http://www.freebsdzine.org/200102/vmware2.php3 thanks! so i buy a new windoze laptop and want to install while saving all the pre-installed windoze cruft. - do i want to run freebsd inside windows or vice versa? i hear that the former gives one a slightly ill freebsd (clock lag etc) - do i buy vmware express or workstation? note that says that only workstation has freebsd, but i suspect that is within a vm - do the normal freebsd partmagic hacks work - or do i backup/restore the windows universe - or do i not care about the dell-specific drivers etc and lastly, what is the more appropriate freebsd mailing list where i should be asking all this? randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 11:16:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0872137B71A for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:16:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f2OJG6008870; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:16:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: gibbs@scsiguy.com Cc: bl@incyte.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: <200103241516.f2OFG3s26048@aslan.scsiguy.com> References: <20010323145325J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <200103241516.f2OFG3s26048@aslan.scsiguy.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010324111606B.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:16:06 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 15 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >I'm still getting the "Invalidating pack" error on my test system, > >using a 4.3-RC snapshot built from last night's CVS repository. > > I still need all of the messages displayed by the driver in > order to help here. I'm sure if you install via a serial > console, you'll be able to capture them. Sorry, I should have noted earlier that this is *all* the driver prints now - the other output has completely gone away and I only get one line on the console before it locks up. Did you simply move it under bootverbose and I'm a dumb-cluck for not booting -v or does this indicate something more mysterious? It certainly generated more diagnostic output before your last round of fixes. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 12:30:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2355A37B71A for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:30:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2OKSKR05745; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:28:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:28:20 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103242028.f2OKSKR05745@earth.backplane.com> To: Dave Tweten Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-RC Kernel Buffer Corruption (Was: 4.3-BETA makeworld of current STABLE Fails) References: <200103240249.f2O2ng602441@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've gone through a diff of the -stable kernel between Feb 15 and March 6. It took a while. I had to hack cvs to allow date specs to include branch names (else cvs diff -D -D works off of HEAD). I'll send an email with that patch a little later after I clean it up. I went through around 26786 lines of diffs. All sorts stuff was changed/added, such as the kqueue stuff, M_ZERO, networking, some softupdates cleanups, a minor VM fix, etc.... but most of it just doesn't apply to a buildworld. Two things stand out. * The allocation of memory was changed to allocate from the end of memory backwards rather then the beginning of memory forwards. * ATA/IDE was adjusted to support new DMA modes for VIA chipsets. I think there are two possibilities here: (1) You have bad memory somewhere and the memory ordering change is simply making it apparent. (2) Your motherboard is using the VIA chipset and the new kernels are using a different DMA mode then the Feb16 kernel, and there is a DMA related bug. It should be easy to check both. To check #2 look at the 'dmesg' output when booting the working kernel and when booting the new kernel. Boot in bootverbose mode (I think that's -v from the bootstrap prompt). To check #1 try replacing the memory in the box. I will look at the changes made to the memory ordering in vm/vm_page.c and to zalloc later tonight, but I don't think they introduced any bugs. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 12:41:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hungry.spb.cityline.ru (hungry.spb.cityline.ru [212.46.192.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB8337B719 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 12:41:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) Received: from lev.sereb.net (ip-1390.dialup.cl.spb.ru [212.46.200.168]) by hungry.spb.cityline.ru (8.11.2/8.8/CL) with ESMTP id f2OKbjS20286 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:37:51 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:41:32 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.47 Halloween Edition) Personal Reply-To: Lev Serebryakov Organization: Home X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <4335435510.20010324214132@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: All Subject: ATA driver MFC?! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, All! How are you? Will ATA driver MFCed before 4.3-RELEASE? These fixes is very appreciated: Fix the problem with some drives not reporting back when the are busy blanking and erasing CD-RW media. This fixes burncd's premature returns from blanking/erasing that caused trouble. My Yamaha CR-4802 produce these errors on `burncd balnk` (part of `dmesg'): acd0: CD-RW at ata0-slave using PIO3 acd1: CDROM at ata1-slave using WDMA2 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a >skipp< acd0: READ_TOC - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=2c ascq=00 error=00 acd0: PREVENT_ALLOW - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=2c ascq=00 error=00 acd0: START_STOP - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=2c ascq=00 error=00 acd0: PREVENT_ALLOW - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=2c ascq=00 error=00 burncd exits with error, but drive blanks disk (command is accepted by it). And, also, `burncd fixate' produce this error: acd0: PREVENT_ALLOW - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=2c ascq=00 error=00 Again, burncd exits with error, but drive close disk... Lev Serebryakov /-----------------------------------------------\ | FIDONet: 2:5030/661.0 | | E-Mail: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru | | Page: http://lev.serebryakov.spb.ru/ | | ICQ UIN: 3670018 | | Phone: You know, if you have world nodelist | \===============================================/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 15: 3:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from postal.incyte.com (postal.incyte.com [198.31.37.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0E037B719 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:03:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bl@incyte.com) Received: from blah.incyte.com (blah.incyte.com [10.99.1.40]) by postal.incyte.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2ON3U508168 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:03:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from blah.incyte.com (bl@localhost) by blah.incyte.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA24283 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:03:31 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103242303.PAA24283@blah.incyte.com> X-Authentication-Warning: blah.incyte.com: bl owned process doing -bs To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: cron jobs each running twice Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:03:30 -0800 From: "Brett G. Lemoine" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, on top of everything else (see 'ahc - Invalidating pack' thread), I now discover that my cron is running each job twice with the same time stamp. Tailing /var/log/cron appears to show the CMD messages showing up close enough to silmutaneous that I can't perceive any time lag between them. I've killed ntp in case it was causing some miniscule time jumps, but it's been dead for an hour now, and it's still doing it. Mar 24 16:50:00 blur /USR/SBIN/CRON[11024]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) Mar 24 16:50:00 blur /USR/SBIN/CRON[11025]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) Mar 24 16:55:00 blur /USR/SBIN/CRON[11030]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) Mar 24 16:55:00 blur /USR/SBIN/CRON[11031]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) Mar 24 17:00:00 blur /USR/SBIN/CRON[11063]: (root) CMD (newsyslog) Mar 24 17:00:00 blur /USR/SBIN/CRON[11064]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) Mar 24 17:00:00 blur /USR/SBIN/CRON[11065]: (root) CMD (newsyslog) Mar 24 17:00:00 blur /USR/SBIN/CRON[11066]: (root) CMD (/usr/libexec/atrun) Before anyone asks, no, there aren't two cron processes running, and there aren't duplicate entries, or any percevable corruption in the crontab file. This coupled with my other problems are strongly pointing me toward motherboard problems, but before I completely commit, I thought I'd raise the issue here. Is there _any_ way this isn't a motherboard issue? thanks, bl -- //====== Brett G. Lemoine -=- ===============================\\ || Info. Systems Architect | || ||Core Unix System Services| If it's tourist season, || || Incyte Genomics | why can't we shoot them? || || Palo Alto, California | || |+-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+| \\== PGP Key Fingerprint: 68 A1 2A 2D 82 CE E9 70 5B 80 D1 11 EC F3 FB 85 ==// To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 15:19: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-43.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5762137B71A for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:18:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0DCEF66C3B; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:18:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:18:57 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Volker Stolz Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA: make kernel -j N broken Message-ID: <20010324151857.A41972@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010324141228.A14647@agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010324141228.A14647@agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>; from stolz@I2.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE on Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:12:28PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:12:28PM +0100, Volker Stolz wrote: > The subject almost says it all. I haven=B4t been able to succesfully > get a kernel this way. Make would stop somewhere in between. > First making buildkernel with -j N and then making installkernel > w/o -j will work, though. Are you remembering to use 'make depend' before you do 'make all -j'? What value of -j are you using? Many people build kernels in parallel, so I'd be somewhat surprised if there was an undiscovered race condition here. Kris --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6vSthWry0BWjoQKURAjrlAJ4lm3Y27IGkZUIWhfAPwEbGbSEVUgCeLKAe O9I6Q7uznQ3VbK6MBpeKlto= =HUR9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 16:23:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vit1.valere.net (vit1.valere.net [63.142.126.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB1137B719 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:23:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallen@valere.net) Received: from localhost (gallen@localhost) by vit1.valere.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA14300 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:23:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gallen@valere.net) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:23:18 -0700 (MST) From: Gerry Allen To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: subscribe Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 16:26:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A92837B71B for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:26:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by thehousleys.net (8.11.3/8.11.2) id f2P0Q0p52677; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 19:26:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) (authenticated) by thehousleys.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2P0Pw552669; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 19:25:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <3ABD3B16.AD56CAD1@thehousleys.net> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 19:25:58 -0500 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Volker Stolz , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA: make kernel -j N broken References: <20010324141228.A14647@agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <20010324151857.A41972@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:12:28PM +0100, Volker Stolz wrote: > > The subject almost says it all. I havenīt been able to succesfully > > get a kernel this way. Make would stop somewhere in between. > > First making buildkernel with -j N and then making installkernel > > w/o -j will work, though. > > Are you remembering to use 'make depend' before you do 'make all > -j'? What value of -j are you using? Many people build kernels in > parallel, so I'd be somewhat surprised if there was an undiscovered > race condition here. > I believe I had the same problem, but with make -j4 buildkernel . So I would hope make depend was run first. Jim -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- jeh@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve jim@TheHousleys.Net http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- Life begins at 4.0 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 16:43: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-43.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3084B37B718 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:43:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 893F666C95; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:42:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:42:59 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: James Housley Cc: Kris Kennaway , Volker Stolz , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA: make kernel -j N broken Message-ID: <20010324164259.A58052@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010324141228.A14647@agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <20010324151857.A41972@xor.obsecurity.org> <3ABD3B16.AD56CAD1@thehousleys.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3ABD3B16.AD56CAD1@thehousleys.net>; from jim@thehousleys.net on Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:25:58PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 07:25:58PM -0500, James Housley wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >=20 > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:12:28PM +0100, Volker Stolz wrote: > > > The subject almost says it all. I haven=B4t been able to succesfully > > > get a kernel this way. Make would stop somewhere in between. > > > First making buildkernel with -j N and then making installkernel > > > w/o -j will work, though. > >=20 > > Are you remembering to use 'make depend' before you do 'make all > > -j'? What value of -j are you using? Many people build kernels in > > parallel, so I'd be somewhat surprised if there was an undiscovered > > race condition here. > >=20 >=20 > I believe I had the same problem, but with make -j4 buildkernel . So I > would hope make depend was run first. Oops, I wasn't awake when I wrote that. It is conceivable that make buildkernel does the wrong thing here, though I've not checked. Kris --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6vT8TWry0BWjoQKURAtj+AKDh1rBG06QK3VyYA2hzROOeQN5MKgCg7UBF ovbKZ92oUuwpSADKJHEvulk= =8eyc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 16:48:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D43E37B71D for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:48:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesper@skriver.dk) Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A6A165D60; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 01:48:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 01:48:15 +0100 From: Jesper Skriver To: Juriy Goloveshkin Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ad vs wd Message-ID: <20010325014815.A30033@skriver.dk> References: <20010322234317.A67583@avias.com> <20010322215616.A95073@skriver.dk> <20010323001615.A68004@avias.com> <20010322221743.A95440@skriver.dk> <20010323002806.A68214@avias.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010323002806.A68214@avias.com>; from juriy@avias.com on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:28:06AM +0300 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B88 9CE8 66E9 E631 C9C5 5EB4 22AB F0EC F956 1C31 X-PGP-Public-Key: http://freesbee.wheel.dk/~jesper/gpgkey.pub Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:28:06AM +0300, Juriy Goloveshkin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 10:17:43PM +0100, Jesper Skriver wrote: > > > > The wd driver doesn't have support for the higher speeds, as the ata > > > > driver does, so it looks like bad cables to me, be sure you use proper > > > > cables. > > > > > > my motherboard supports only ata33 so it's better for me to work via wd than > > > via unstable(on my box) ad. so please, don't remove wd. > > What about fixing your defect HW, > > my defect hardware(?) works with wd. THAT is a point... Doesn't show it's a problem with the ad driver, as the wd driver only support lower speeds. > > or forcing the ATA driver to use the > > lower speeds like the wd driver. > > I tried. NO effects - unstable work with reboots. Then please show that you use the lower speeds, and give a minimum of information about the crashes, see the handbook for debugging kernel crashes. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: FreeBSD committer @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 16:49:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3707E37B718 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:49:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2P0mNs29898; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:49:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200103250049.f2P0mNs29898@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: bl@incyte.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahc - Invalidating pack In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:16:06 PST." <20010324111606B.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:48:23 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> >I'm still getting the "Invalidating pack" error on my test system, >> >using a 4.3-RC snapshot built from last night's CVS repository. >> >> I still need all of the messages displayed by the driver in >> order to help here. I'm sure if you install via a serial >> console, you'll be able to capture them. > >Sorry, I should have noted earlier that this is *all* the driver >prints now - the other output has completely gone away and I only get >one line on the console before it locks up. Did you simply move it >under bootverbose and I'm a dumb-cluck for not booting -v or does this >indicate something more mysterious? It certainly generated more >diagnostic output before your last round of fixes. The diagnostics you provided don't even include the "invalidating pack" message. There must be more, or why would you believe that the problem is related to the ahc driver? ;-) As to your other question, I haven't pushed anything behind the bootverbose flag recently. It wouldn't hurt to boot that way though. CAM gives more information in that case. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 17: 5:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (femail2.rdc1.on.home.com [24.2.9.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CF937B719 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:05:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@riles.ca) Received: from chris ([24.226.119.64]) by femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010325010514.VIAL1545.femail2.rdc1.on.home.com@chris> for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:05:14 -0800 Message-ID: <000701c0b4c7$aaedd9e0$0100a8c0@chris> Reply-To: "Chris Riley" From: "Chris Riley" To: Subject: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:05:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 17:18: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe31.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.14.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EFA37B718 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:18:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itsmefiberops@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:18:02 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [24.4.40.69] From: "FiberOps" To: Subject: subscribe Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 19:18:14 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C0B497.2C9E3100" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2001 01:18:02.0424 (UTC) FILETIME=[6FD83380:01C0B4C9] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C0B497.2C9E3100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable .................... ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C0B497.2C9E3100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
....................
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C0B497.2C9E3100-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 20: 6:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from slate.Mines.EDU (slate.Mines.EDU [138.67.1.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E8037B71B for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:06:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rrodrigu@Mines.EDU) Received: from slate.Mines.EDU (slate.Mines.EDU [138.67.1.38]) by slate.Mines.EDU (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA79370 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:06:13 -0700 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:06:13 -0700 (MST) From: rogelio To: Subject: modem and ppp's "terminal mode" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been having some trouble using ppp's terminal mode with my modem. from dmesg: sio4: at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 Too often it locks up everything and I have to shutdown manually. This only happens when I use terminal mode. This modem is about 2 and half months old and I've always had this problem. Any ideas? Thanks Rogelio Rodriguez To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 20:17:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from web10003.mail.yahoo.com (web10003.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1165537B719 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:17:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james_bond_79@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010325041749.17431.qmail@web10003.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.169.197.238] by web10003.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:17:49 PST Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:17:49 -0800 (PST) From: james Subject: Problem with pcm sound To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The basic problem is that SNDCTL_DSP_SPEED ioctl seems to not be able to set 44.1 Khz speeds on my system. Some sound programs die there, others (xmms) will then try 48Khz, this speed works but then the sound is messy. The sound card is a buildin ac'97 codec on the via southbridge, here is relevant parts of boot -v: pcm0: port 0xe400-0xe403,0xe000-0xe003,0xdc00-0xdcff irq 3 at device 7.5 on pci0 pcm0: ac97 codec id 0x57454301 pcm0: ac97 codec features 5 bit master volume, Reserved 27 pcm0: ac97 secondary codec pcm: setmap 1000, 4000; 0xcb31a000 -> 1000 pcm: setmap 5000, 4000; 0xcb31e000 -> 5000 If there is any way to fix this please tell me, if this is a bug then tell me what info to gather and I can get it. This is a 4.3-RC box. Thanks for any help / pointers to docs / whatever. James __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 20:22: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vilnya.demon.co.uk (vilnya.demon.co.uk [158.152.19.238]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B1D37B718 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:21:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gandalf@vilnya.demon.co.uk) Received: from haveblue (haveblue.rings [10.2.4.5]) by vilnya.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 865C9D9A8; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 05:21:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <014001c0b4e3$2f971420$0504020a@haveblue> From: "Cameron Grant" To: "james" , References: <20010325041749.17431.qmail@web10003.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Problem with pcm sound Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 05:22:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > pcm0: port > 0xe400-0xe403,0xe000-0xe003,0xdc00-0xdcff irq 3 at > device 7.5 on pci0 > pcm0: ac97 codec id 0x57454301 > pcm0: ac97 codec features 5 bit master volume, > Reserved 27 > If there is any way to fix this please tell me, if > this is a bug then tell me what info to gather and I > can get it. This is a 4.3-RC box. not fixable at present, your hardware only supports 48khz. -cg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 20:28:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from web10002.mail.yahoo.com (web10002.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1606237B71B for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:28:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james_bond_79@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20010325042808.40962.qmail@web10002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.169.197.238] by web10002.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:28:08 PST Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:28:08 -0800 (PST) From: james Subject: Re: Problem with pcm sound To: Cameron Grant , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <014001c0b4e3$2f971420$0504020a@haveblue> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG But is there any reason that the sound has to be bad? In windows it seems to work fine. Owell, I have been meaning to go get a _real_ sound card for this box anyway ;P Thanks for the info. James --- Cameron Grant wrote: > > pcm0: port > > 0xe400-0xe403,0xe000-0xe003,0xdc00-0xdcff irq 3 at > > device 7.5 on pci0 > > pcm0: ac97 codec id 0x57454301 > > pcm0: ac97 codec features 5 bit master volume, > > Reserved 27 > > > If there is any way to fix this please tell me, if > > this is a bug then tell me what info to gather and > I > > can get it. This is a 4.3-RC box. > > not fixable at present, your hardware only supports > 48khz. > > -cg > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 20:46:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from epsilon.lucida.ca (epsilon.lucida.ca [209.47.215.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 777DF37B71A for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:46:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@LUCIDA.CA) Received: (qmail 56018 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Mar 2001 04:46:40 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2001 04:46:40 -0000 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:46:39 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Heckaman To: Kris Kennaway Cc: James Housley , Volker Stolz , Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA: make kernel -j N broken In-Reply-To: <20010324164259.A58052@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: ... : > I believe I had the same problem, but with make -j4 buildkernel . So I : > would hope make depend was run first. : : Oops, I wasn't awake when I wrote that. It is conceivable that make : buildkernel does the wrong thing here, though I've not checked. I haven't tried buildkernel with -j4, but I have successfully built world with -j4 as well as building kernel the normal way with -j4, though I do not run the make depend with -j4.. If that helps. * Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.ca http://www.lucida.ca/pgp * * GPG fingerprint - 53CA 8320 C8F6 32ED 9DDF 036E 3171 C093 4AD3 1364 * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.ca/pgp iD8DBQE6vXgwMXHAk0rTE2QRAqTpAJ4rKJHJXsDrTQg8zMY/JdqIquhyHwCfTvP5 F1UYF/eVrbIEZvvnpx/BzpY= =D7Jp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 21:40:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server1.wallnet.com (server1.wallnet.com [208.225.162.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B04E37B719 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:40:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from timothyk@server1.wallnet.com) Received: from localhost (timothyk@localhost) by server1.wallnet.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id AAA15524; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 00:37:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 00:37:33 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Kellers Cc: kellers@njit.edu, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DNS blues after 4.3RC/1.3 upgrade In-Reply-To: <102860000.985455578@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Turns out that, for the time being, changing the nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf to a real world DNS solves the problem. I've yet to test out if AirportConfigurator.jar (from the ports collection) can handle the new Apple Airport 1.3 update. I hope it does or it can be updated to do so. The wireless LANs at work use Airport Base Stations, but are all Windows-based laptops with wireless PCMCIA cards. We are Macless, so I depend on that AirportConfiguator.jar utility. Thanks for the response. Tim On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Saturday, March 24, 2001 11:56:01 -0500, Tim Kellers > wrote: > +----- > | their TCP/IP control panel (24.3.196.33, 24.3 196.34), but in > | /stand/sysinstall's network interface configuration (via dhcp) the > | nameserver address defaults to 10.0.1.1 which is the same address as the > | gateway. > +--->8 > > Some people here have complained about the new AirPort firmware doing that, > so I think you can rule out FreeBSD as the cause. > > -- > brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net > system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu > electrical and computer engineering KF8NH > carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls] > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 22:33:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from astral.isec.com.br (astral.isec.com.br [200.254.79.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DEF437B718 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 22:33:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from duwde@duwde.com.br) Received: (qmail 13977 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2001 06:31:42 -0000 Received: from localhost.isec.com.br (HELO duwde.com.br) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.isec.com.br with SMTP; 25 Mar 2001 06:31:42 -0000 Message-ID: <3ABD9014.E78871BC@duwde.com.br> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 03:28:36 -0300 From: "Duwde (Fabio V. Dias)" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd revealing too much stuff. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There is little sense to post this back, anyway I want to make things clear. It's really incredible how a few people can laught on something they don't understand. Please try to understand what I'm saying.... > This super secret place wouldn't happen to be: > Received: from astral.isec.com.br (astral.isec.com.br [200.254.79.62]) No, there is no secret whatsoever, And yes, we all know that you can read mail headers, what's the big deal ? All machines running latest stable will show this behavior (including my own server). I never tryed to hide anything. > Which also happens to a be a webserver, mail server, and name server. Nice, it seems you can run nmap. > Well... is this a fingerprint? > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-BETA i386) NO !! YOU'RE 110% WRONG !! Just for your information, THIS ISN'T the server above. It's another machine, the server above isn't running Xfree, nor Netscape. > Mr. Kennaway was right. It was pretty trivial to fingerprint a system on > the net. As you can see, you were UNABLE to fingerprint the system above, as you've identified the OS version using the Mail header that came from ANOTHER machine. *(my personal one)*, I sent trough a SSH redirect tunnel (that's why you TOUGHT it was coming from localhost). If it were localhost, it probabily would be injected directly (no localhost connectiong needed). Don't comment on what you can't understand. Btw the question I started isn't when you can use any KNOWN fingerprint technique to identify the OS, that's easy to do trough many ways, the question is that when they added "green@FreeBSD.org 200103021" to the SSH_VERSION, and as sshd is as server USUALLY allowed to the whole internet, they are allowing ANYONE to know the EXACT OpenSSH version + Freebsd.mods just connecting to the sshd port. Pretty easier than any known fingerprint method I know. (Except your wrong way to identify things, trough mails hahah) As someone has already stated on this list after my first post, it's used to IDENTIFY which SSHDs are FIXED against the latest bugs. So we're making life easier to possible attackers. They can EASILY know (without using any advanced fingerprint technology) that i'm using FreeBSD, and the exact version of SSHD i'm running (fixed one, btw). So if you server doesn't have the new "tag", you're vulnerable. Sounds good for you ? I don't think this is a good aproach. Nor does many people on the net thinking about security. And no, this ISN'T security by obscurity, I just don't like to let anyone know more than they need. If you don't care, I don't mind. Btw, This is my last post on this issue. -- Fabio Vilan Dias / Duwde PGP key @ http://www.duwde.com.br/duwdepgp.asc FP = BB35 50F2 7F83 655D 6B11 F0A2 F8E2 FF3D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 24 22:54:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC2E37B71B for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 22:54:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from graywane@home.com) Received: from cg392862-a.adubn1.nj.home.com ([65.2.79.221]) by femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010325065444.XXVE10447.femail10.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cg392862-a.adubn1.nj.home.com>; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 22:54:44 -0800 Received: (from graywane@localhost) by cg392862-a.adubn1.nj.home.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2P6shP29285; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 01:54:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from graywane) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 01:54:43 -0500 From: Graywane To: "Duwde (Fabio V. Dias)" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sshd revealing too much stuff. Message-ID: <20010325015443.A29255@home.com> References: <3ABD9014.E78871BC@duwde.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3ABD9014.E78871BC@duwde.com.br>; from duwde@duwde.com.br on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:28:36AM -0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:28:36AM -0300, Duwde (Fabio V. Dias) wrote: > I don't think this is a good aproach. Nor does many people on the net > thinking about security. And no, this ISN'T security by obscurity, I > just don't like to let anyone know more than they need. If you don't > care, I don't mind. Yes, it is security by obscurity and no, most people thinking about security on the net do not believe it is an effective technique to secure a site. You secure a site by: 1. Only running services you actually need. 2. Installing good firewall rules. 3. Using any of the numerous IDS and NIDS systems. 4. Examining the source code for services you do run. 5. Not giving untrusted people accounts on your machine. 6. Having a policy in place for handling intrusions. 7. Actively monitoring security related lists and sites. =20 It shouldn't matter if people know what OS and/or software you are using. If it does, then you may be in the wrong profession. > Btw, This is my last post on this issue. OK. --=20 Note: See http://www.members.home.net/graywane/ for PGP information. --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjq9ljIACgkQeHdFaBWUGN0IIACguQ1A9nj6aEeH8fO4XhYy7fkz gu8AoKGIjn9f1crHqp12N6YN45Fz+jZV =nA7R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message