From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 1:42:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3888037B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jolly.drunkmonk.net (jolly.drunkmonk.net [66.37.140.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2CA43E64 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:42:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from verm@jolly.drunkmonk.net) Received: from jolly.drunkmonk.net (verm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jolly.drunkmonk.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6F8g99H021140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:42:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from verm@jolly.drunkmonk.net) Received: (from verm@localhost) by jolly.drunkmonk.net (8.12.3/8.12.1/Submit) id g6F8g9Pt021139 for freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:42:09 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:42:09 -0600 From: Amar Takhar To: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting Message-ID: <20020715084209.GA21007@drunkmonk.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020709195436.95062.qmail@web20709.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020709195436.95062.qmail@web20709.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2002-07-09 12:54 -0700, Brett D. Estrade wrote: > Has there been any consideration for using http://www.sourceforge.org > to host the project? It has everything a project could need/want from > what I am familiar with. If this was considered before but > discounted, what were the issues? > Sourceforge is *highly* over-rated, it's slow and well over-used. We have our own fast dedicated machine that's 100% for our own use. I don't see why we would close our options by going to something like sourceforge. Amar. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 1:57:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C4537B401 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsdcluster.org (freebsdcluster.dk [195.184.98.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8AB43E67 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:57:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lasse@freebsdcluster.org) Received: by freebsdcluster.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 8E335AC70B; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:57:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 212.36.45.148 ( [212.36.45.148]) as user lasse@freebsdcluster.org by www.freebsdcluster.dk with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:57:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1026723461.3d328e85e34e6@www.freebsdcluster.dk> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:57:41 +0200 From: "Lasse L. Johnsen" To: Amar Takhar Cc: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting References: <20020709195436.95062.qmail@web20709.mail.yahoo.com> <20020715084209.GA21007@drunkmonk.net> In-Reply-To: <20020715084209.GA21007@drunkmonk.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, I agree, in the long term the dedicated machine will be a lot more useful than Sourceforge will in the short term. /Lasse Quoting Amar Takhar : > On 2002-07-09 12:54 -0700, Brett D. Estrade wrote: > > Has there been any consideration for using http://www.sourceforge.org > > to host the project? It has everything a project could need/want from > > what I am familiar with. If this was considered before but > > discounted, what were the issues? > > > > Sourceforge is *highly* over-rated, it's slow and well over-used. We have > our > own fast dedicated machine that's 100% for our own use. I don't see why we > would close our options by going to something like sourceforge. > > Amar. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 2:16:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948DA37B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.nentec.de (gate2.nentec.de [194.25.215.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C110943E6E for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:16:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sporner@nentec.de) Received: from nenny.nentec.de (root@nenny.nentec.de [153.92.64.1]) by gate.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6F9GWA00815; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:16:32 +0200 Received: from nentec.de (andromeda.nentec.de [153.92.64.34]) by nenny.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g6F9GUZ23387; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:16:30 +0200 Message-ID: <3D3292ED.3010009@nentec.de> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:16:29 +0200 From: Andy Sporner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: de-at, de, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Lasse L. Johnsen" Cc: Amar Takhar , freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting References: <20020709195436.95062.qmail@web20709.mail.yahoo.com> <20020715084209.GA21007@drunkmonk.net> <1026723461.3d328e85e34e6@www.freebsdcluster.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG OK, I am going to make the suggestion that we go ahead as we had originally planned and make use of the work that Amar had started. It is probably a good idea to put a home page on SF for those who might be interested in this go find us. Amar, why not check the current (what you did to fix the TK/BLT thing in). Derek, what were the specific changes in V-212 that are posted on Chris's website? We need to get them rolled into Amar's changes. Has anybody had any success using the software yet? I don't believe in this case that 'no news is good news' ;-) Andy Lasse L. Johnsen wrote: >Yes, I agree, in the long term the dedicated machine will be a lot more useful >than Sourceforge will in the short term. > >/Lasse > >Quoting Amar Takhar : > >>On 2002-07-09 12:54 -0700, Brett D. Estrade wrote: >> >>>Has there been any consideration for using http://www.sourceforge.org >>>to host the project? It has everything a project could need/want from >>>what I am familiar with. If this was considered before but >>>discounted, what were the issues? >>> >>Sourceforge is *highly* over-rated, it's slow and well over-used. We have >>our >>own fast dedicated machine that's 100% for our own use. I don't see why we >>would close our options by going to something like sourceforge. >> >>Amar. >> >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message >> > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 2:23:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84AD37B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.nentec.de (gate2.nentec.de [194.25.215.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9203C43E64 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sporner@nentec.de) Received: from nenny.nentec.de (root@nenny.nentec.de [153.92.64.1]) by gate.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6F9NjA00868; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:23:45 +0200 Received: from nentec.de (andromeda.nentec.de [153.92.64.34]) by nenny.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g6F9NgZ23684; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:23:43 +0200 Message-ID: <3D32949E.8040500@nentec.de> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:23:42 +0200 From: Andy Sporner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: de-at, de, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Clifton Royston Cc: aaron g , freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SPREAD clusters References: <20020709212404.16403.qmail@operamail.com> <3D2D483E.4040100@nentec.de> <20020711084338.B18402@lava.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Clifton Royston wrote: >>the last 4 years and have never had a chance to commit it to a >>document. I suppose it is probably about time to do so. I even came >>up with a way that network applications can survive a node move as >>well, though it requires a special protocol and a front-end device to >>achieve this. For the sake of the front-end device and potential >>single points of failures, we have phase-1 of the clustering >>software, but ultimately, phase-2 should completely replace phase-1 >>for everything else. >> > > I assume this will be targeted at the current -current track (5.x >release) to take advantage of the major rewrite of kernel scheduling >there? > Yes, absolutely. >This sounds like a great project. I'm in agreement with both your >goals and the stages you're talking about to reach it. I've had >daydreams of trying to hammer together something similar, but don't >have the experience with clustering that you've brought to the project. >Addressing basic application failover in a structured way as you've >done does seem like the best place to start, and then go for the big >issues of moving processes, interacting with other kernels, etc. I >agree that it wouldn't make much sense sinking too much effort into >load-balancing the *front* end (network connections) in software at >this stage, when there are hardware products out there that will do it >at a reasonable price. > Well our device starts about 15K (but you get 32 10/100's ports and 4 Gb ports full line speed switching--and High availability--gee I wonder where this comes from ;-)) > > If you don't mind, maybe this sketch of the project you just gave >could be committed to the documentation as a starting point. > Yep. I will write a paper about phase-2. It should be easy if I grab all of the fragments of things I said before. > > > On the storage front, do you think it would be worthwhile to also >address in an upcoming phase the failover of shared storage access, >using something like the "Tertiary Disk project" node design at: > > I had an idea to extend Vinum in a way to provide "Remote Raw Disks", which might be similar to Tertiary Disk Project. Have you interest in taking this a working point? Andy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 2:37:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE6437B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.nentec.de (gate2.nentec.de [194.25.215.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C76443E6A for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:37:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sporner@nentec.de) Received: from nenny.nentec.de (root@nenny.nentec.de [153.92.64.1]) by gate.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6F9b6A05923; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:37:06 +0200 Received: from nentec.de (andromeda.nentec.de [153.92.64.34]) by nenny.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g6F9b3Z24442; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:37:03 +0200 Message-ID: <3D3297BF.6070401@nentec.de> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:37:03 +0200 From: Andy Sporner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: de-at, de, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Sporner Cc: "Lasse L. Johnsen" , Amar Takhar , freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting References: <20020709195436.95062.qmail@web20709.mail.yahoo.com> <20020715084209.GA21007@drunkmonk.net> <1026723461.3d328e85e34e6@www.freebsdcluster.dk> <3D3292ED.3010009@nentec.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I realized I made a mistake in this email. I meant 213 not 212, as I was the one who released 211 and 212 ;-) Old age has not caught up with me all the way yet ;-) Andy Andy Sporner wrote: > OK, > > I am going to make the suggestion that we go ahead as we had originally > planned and make use of the work that Amar had started. It is probably > a good idea to put a home page on SF for those who might be interested in > this go find us. > > Amar, why not check the current (what you did to fix the TK/BLT thing > in). > > Derek, what were the specific changes in V-212 that are posted on Chris's > website? We need to get them rolled into Amar's changes. > > Has anybody had any success using the software yet? I don't believe > in this > case that 'no news is good news' ;-) > > > Andy > > > Lasse L. Johnsen wrote: > >> Yes, I agree, in the long term the dedicated machine will be a lot >> more useful than Sourceforge will in the short term. >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 2:49:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0201137B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsdcluster.org (freebsdcluster.dk [195.184.98.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF3A43E3B for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:49:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lasse@freebsdcluster.org) Received: by freebsdcluster.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id BB693AC703; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:49:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 212.36.45.148 ( [212.36.45.148]) as user lasse@freebsdcluster.org by www.freebsdcluster.dk with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:49:30 +0200 Message-ID: <1026726570.3d329aaa59f96@www.freebsdcluster.dk> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:49:30 +0200 From: "Lasse L. Johnsen" To: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting References: <20020709195436.95062.qmail@web20709.mail.yahoo.com> <20020715084209.GA21007@drunkmonk.net> <1026723461.3d328e85e34e6@www.freebsdcluster.dk> <3D3292ED.3010009@nentec.de> In-Reply-To: <3D3292ED.3010009@nentec.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andy and others, I happen to be the registered owner of the FreebsdCluster.[dk|org|net|com] domains. I'd be happy to make a subdomain and/or a "/whatever" redirect to whereever we're going to keep the project website. /Lasse Quoting Andy Sporner : > OK, > > I am going to make the suggestion that we go ahead as we had originally > planned and make use of the work that Amar had started. It is probably > a good idea to put a home page on SF for those who might be interested in > this go find us. > > Amar, why not check the current (what you did to fix the TK/BLT thing in). > > Derek, what were the specific changes in V-212 that are posted on Chris's > website? We need to get them rolled into Amar's changes. > > Has anybody had any success using the software yet? I don't believe in this > case that 'no news is good news' ;-) > > > Andy > > > Lasse L. Johnsen wrote: > > >Yes, I agree, in the long term the dedicated machine will be a lot more > useful > >than Sourceforge will in the short term. > > > >/Lasse > > > >Quoting Amar Takhar : > > > >>On 2002-07-09 12:54 -0700, Brett D. Estrade wrote: > >> > >>>Has there been any consideration for using http://www.sourceforge.org > >>>to host the project? It has everything a project could need/want from > >>>what I am familiar with. If this was considered before but > >>>discounted, what were the issues? > >>> > >>Sourceforge is *highly* over-rated, it's slow and well over-used. We have > >>our > >>own fast dedicated machine that's 100% for our own use. I don't see why > we > >>would close our options by going to something like sourceforge. > >> > >>Amar. > >> > >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > >> > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 2:56:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9D737B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsdcluster.org (freebsdcluster.dk [195.184.98.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C9443E67 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:56:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lasse@freebsdcluster.org) Received: by freebsdcluster.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id EBA49AC703; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:56:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 212.36.45.148 ( [212.36.45.148]) as user lasse@freebsdcluster.org by www.freebsdcluster.dk with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:56:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1026726978.3d329c42901a5@www.freebsdcluster.dk> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:56:18 +0200 From: "Lasse L. Johnsen" To: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting References: <20020709195436.95062.qmail@web20709.mail.yahoo.com> <20020715084209.GA21007@drunkmonk.net> <1026723461.3d328e85e34e6@www.freebsdcluster.dk> <3D3292ED.3010009@nentec.de> In-Reply-To: <3D3292ED.3010009@nentec.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Andy Sporner : > Has anybody had any success using the software yet? I don't believe in this > case that 'no news is good news' ;-) Does anyone have a test machine setup they are willing to provide access to for development purposes? The setup should probably look something like this: Com Internet +------------+ Console +---------------+ | -----------| Shell |---------+ Test server 1 |--| | server |--+ +---------------+ | +------------+ | | Common LAN | +---------------+ | +------| Test server 2 |--| +---------------+ | Com Console /Lasse To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 3:35:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F239537B405 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 03:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.nentec.de (gate2.nentec.de [194.25.215.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765BB43E58 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 03:35:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sporner@nentec.de) Received: from nenny.nentec.de (root@nenny.nentec.de [153.92.64.1]) by gate.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6FAZYA16268; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:35:34 +0200 Received: from nentec.de (andromeda.nentec.de [153.92.64.34]) by nenny.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g6FAZVZ27648; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:35:31 +0200 Message-ID: <3D32A573.8060204@nentec.de> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:35:31 +0200 From: Andy Sporner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: de-at, de, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Lasse L. Johnsen" Cc: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting References: <20020709195436.95062.qmail@web20709.mail.yahoo.com> <20020715084209.GA21007@drunkmonk.net> <1026723461.3d328e85e34e6@www.freebsdcluster.dk> <3D3292ED.3010009@nentec.de> <1026726570.3d329aaa59f96@www.freebsdcluster.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Lasse L. Johnsen wrote: >Andy and others, > >I happen to be the registered owner of the FreebsdCluster.[dk|org|net|com] >domains. I'd be happy to make a subdomain and/or a "/whatever" redirect to >whereever we're going to keep the project website. > >/Lasse > Hi, Not bad! But I think we need to get our website operating ;-) There is also a misunderstanding I think in the documentation. the 'CSE' patch is only an enhancement that allows processes to be tracked against their 'resource'. So for instance when the 'rc' script runs, it set's it's own resource ID and all of it's children get the same ID. Under the 'resource' section the processes associated with the resource are shown just as below on the node section shows all the processes on each node. Andy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 4:22:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F1F37B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 04:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ws3.hk5.outblaze.com (202-77-181-90.outblaze.com [202.77.181.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2665843E3B for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 04:22:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from derekbarrett@graffiti.net) Received: (qmail 18665 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Jul 2002 11:22:10 -0000 Message-ID: <20020715112210.18663.qmail@graffiti.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) Received: from [66.51.217.108] by ws3.hk5.outblaze.com with http for derekbarrett@graffiti.net; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:22:10 +0800 From: "Derek Barrett" To: , "Lasse L. Johnsen" Cc: , freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:22:10 +0800 Subject: Re: project hosting X-Originating-Ip: 66.51.217.108 X-Originating-Server: ws3.hk5.outblaze.com Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Good morning/evening everybody! Andy, Well, the patch to version 213 isn't major, it just fixes the build problem by removing the -ld switch within one of the make files. As far as running the software goes, I've just been concentrating on getting it installed and configured, and working with other contributors on the list, to get the docs updated to reflect the process. Unfortunatley I have to give up one of my machines, so I'm down to 2 test machines. Someone has to have an old clunker around I can use. Lasse, Someone on this list mentioned they had some machines available for testing. I can't remember who it was. I'll look it up though. As far as Sourceforge goes, I like the idea of keeping the work to the server that Amar has dedicated, he is a pro with tools like DocBook and CVS. But maybe later we can put a simple link on Sourceforge, to his server like someone suggested. Most of the major projects I see there usually have an external site as their headquarters anyway. Derek ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Sporner Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:16:29 +0200 To: "Lasse L. Johnsen" Subject: Re: project hosting > OK, > > I am going to make the suggestion that we go ahead as we had originally > planned and make use of the work that Amar had started. It is probably > a good idea to put a home page on SF for those who might be interested in > this go find us. > > Amar, why not check the current (what you did to fix the TK/BLT thing in). > > Derek, what were the specific changes in V-212 that are posted on Chris's > website? We need to get them rolled into Amar's changes. > > Has anybody had any success using the software yet? I don't believe in this > case that 'no news is good news' ;-) > > > Andy > > > Lasse L. Johnsen wrote: > > >Yes, I agree, in the long term the dedicated machine will be a lot more useful > >than Sourceforge will in the short term. > > > >/Lasse > > > >Quoting Amar Takhar : > > > >>On 2002-07-09 12:54 -0700, Brett D. Estrade wrote: > >> > >>>Has there been any consideration for using http://www.sourceforge.org > >>>to host the project? It has everything a project could need/want from > >>>what I am familiar with. If this was considered before but > >>>discounted, what were the issues? > >>> > >>Sourceforge is *highly* over-rated, it's slow and well over-used. We have > >>our > >>own fast dedicated machine that's 100% for our own use. I don't see why we > >>would close our options by going to something like sourceforge. > >> > >>Amar. > >> > >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > >> > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > > -- _______________________________________________ Get your free email from http://www.graffiti.net Powered by Outblaze To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 4:40:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CDA37B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 04:40:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ws2.hk5.outblaze.com (202-77-181-84.outblaze.com [202.77.181.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4592F43E4A for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 04:40:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from derekbarrett@graffiti.net) Received: (qmail 15747 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Jul 2002 11:40:17 -0000 Message-ID: <20020715114017.15746.qmail@graffiti.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.117) Received: from [66.51.217.108] by ws2.hk5.outblaze.com with http for derekbarrett@graffiti.net; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:40:17 +0800 From: "Derek Barrett" To: Cc: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:40:17 +0800 Subject: CSE patch X-Originating-Ip: 66.51.217.108 X-Originating-Server: ws2.hk5.outblaze.com Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andy, So the CSE patch was not incorprated into the 212 build? It should still be applied on top of it? Derek ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Sporner Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:35:31 +0200 To: "Lasse L. Johnsen" Subject: Re: project hosting > Lasse L. Johnsen wrote: > > >Andy and others, > > > >I happen to be the registered owner of the FreebsdCluster.[dk|org|net|com] > >domains. I'd be happy to make a subdomain and/or a "/whatever" redirect to > >whereever we're going to keep the project website. > > > >/Lasse > > > Hi, > > Not bad! But I think we need to get our website operating ;-) > > There is also a misunderstanding I think in the documentation. > > the 'CSE' patch is only an enhancement that allows processes to be > tracked against their 'resource'. So for instance when the 'rc' > script runs, it set's it's own resource ID and all of it's children > get the same ID. Under the 'resource' section the processes associated > with the resource are shown just as below on the node section > shows all the processes on each node. > > Andy > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > > -- _______________________________________________ Get your free email from http://www.graffiti.net Powered by Outblaze To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message