Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Dec 2002 12:48:21 +0100 (CET)
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?= <groudier@free.fr>
To:        "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
Cc:        Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>, <freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Upgrade from Adaptec 2940UW to 29160N - Problem solved! 
Message-ID:  <20021201124031.B2519-100000@localhost.my.domain>
In-Reply-To: <15086.1038605400@monkeys.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:

> In message <20021129202056.A59622@freebie.xs4all.nl>, you wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 11:04:45AM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> >>
> >> In message <2793220000.1038502309@aslan.scsiguy.com>, you wrote:
> >>
> >> >>>> The only mystery that still remains after this whole ordeal is ``=
Why
> >> >>>> was it possible to boot from the mis-allocated partition back whe=
n I
> >> >>>> was using the Adaptec 2940UW, even though it was clearly _not_ po=
ssible
> >> >>>> to boot from the exact same bleedin' partition when using a newer=
 and
> >> >>>> ``more advanced'' Adaptec 29160N ?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Most likely because the setting for "extended translation" was not=
 the
> >> >>> same on both controllers.
> >> >>
> >> >> Actually, it was.  I am quite sure on that point.
> >> >>
> >> >> Both controllers had "BIOS support for disks > 1 GB" set to "disble=
d".
> >> >
> >> >And you use a geometry of 255/63?  That's just plain wrong. 8-)
> >>
> >> It is?
> >>
> >> Who says it is?
> >
> >Justin, who happens to work Adaptec, and has been one of the chief
> >developers of the FreeBSD SCSI subsystem
>
> OK.  That's good enough for me.
>
> But I wish that some of this stuff was written down someplace, for
> the benefit of poor ignorant sods like me who are just trying to
> make their peripherials work.
>
>
> P.S.  As we speak, I am typing this on a machine whose root partition is
> on my shiny new IBM 18GB SCSI drive, with geometry set to 255/63, *and*
> the 29160N it is hooked up to is (I'm quite sure) set to "Support for
> disks > 1GB" *disabled*.
>
> So if this isn't supposed to work, then somebody please explain to me
> why it _does_ clearly work.

The BIOS can read the partition table and fix your broken setup when
possible. One BIOS is probably slightly more lazy than the other one.

  G=E9rard.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021201124031.B2519-100000>