Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 02:17:28 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>, standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Garrett's POSIX versions patch for review Message-ID: <20020318021728.D56122@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <20020227144359.R31007@espresso.q9media.com>; from mike@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 02:43:59PM -0500 References: <20020226.224449.28794535.imp@village.org> <20020227184645.K47808-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020227144359.R31007@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: [...] > +#if __POSIX_VISIBLE > +#define _POSIX_VERSION 200112 > +#define _KPOSIX_VERSION 200112 > +#endif > + > #endif /* !_SYS_CDEFS_H_ */ I ran into a little bit of trouble when testing this. Specifically, NOTES/LINT includes _KPOSIX_VERSION as an option. This conflicts with the ability to define _KPOSIX_VERSION in <sys/cdefs.h>. Does _KPOSIX_VERSION have any use as a kernel option? It would seem to me that, in order to run a FreeBSD system at a different POSIX version than the one the system was designed to run at would require more than just a kernel configuration change. So, this define as a kernel option doesn't really buy us anything. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020318021728.D56122>