From owner-freebsd-vendors Tue Jul 30 8:18:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4010937B401; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (www.freebsdmall.com [66.220.2.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0419743E72; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:18:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id AF0DD2E883; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:18:23 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: vendors@FreeBSD.org Cc: re@FreeBSD.org Subject: 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020730081823.K57599@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The ATA problems appears to be fixed with Soren's most recent change. This was the biggest holdup for 4.6.1. We also have a successfull package build for the point release. However, in light of new vulnerabilities, the security officers are going to merge in a few more changes. The so@ would like to call the release 4.6.2 in light of these new additions and the fact that the RELENG_4_6 branch has been called 4.6.1 for over 10 days now. Please email re@ and so@ if calling the release 4.6.2 ISO would adversely affect your business (i.e., you already have labels printed that say 4.6.1?). We are going to have to rebuild the packages with these new security fixes, so we are again, at least half a week away from the release. ;( - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Wed Jul 31 13:23:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF9637B400 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail12.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8520A43E70 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:23:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from re@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 22736 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 20:23:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail12.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 31 Jul 2002 20:23:34 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6VKNWuR058465; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:23:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from re@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:23:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Release Engineers To: stable@FreeBSD.org, vendors@FreeBSD.org Subject: Status of 4.6.1 Cc: re@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Unfortunately the release of 4.6.1 has been delayed for various reasons including very recently discovered vulnerabilities. The release engineers do not wish to roll a release that includes known security flaws. We are also still waiting on a few serious bug fixes to be merged into the RELENG_4_6 branch. Since the RELENG_4_6 branch already has a tag for 4.6.1 and since the branch has had the name 4.6.1-RELEASE for over a week already, the security-officer and release engineering teams feel that it would be less confusing to rename the pending release to 4.6.2. Unfortunately, a few things were done prematurely in the handling of 4.6.1, and we have learned from that mistake. If you have any questions please feel free to ask us. Thanks. -- Release Engineering Team To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Thu Aug 1 1:12:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7868D37B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from goldrake.psitrust.com (adsl203-148-081.mclink.it [213.203.148.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B6B43E6A; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:12:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandro@focuseek.com) Received: from gundam.psitrust.com (gundam.psitrust.com [10.1.1.21]) by goldrake.psitrust.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g718BeT90005; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:11:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sandro@focuseek.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Sandro Tolaini Organization: psitrust.com To: Release Engineers , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:12:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 Cc: re@FreeBSD.ORG References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday 31 July 2002 22:23, Release Engineers wrote: > If you have any questions please feel free to ask us. Thanks. Just a question about ports: I saw that the ports tree has the matching t= ag=20 for 4.6.1 release at the same revisions of 4.6 (that is, ports bundled wi= th=20 4.6.1 release CDs will be the same packaged with 4.6). I think that ports= =20 bundled with 4.6.2 should be more recent. --=20 Cheers, Sandro Tolaini To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Thu Aug 1 1:29:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0D337B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F0F43E3B; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:29:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from RoKlein@roklein.de) Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng0.kundenserver.de) by moutng1.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #2) id 17aBLD-0002Iw-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 10:29:51 +0200 Received: from [80.129.37.165] (helo=roklein.homeunix.org) by mrelayng0.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #2) id 17aBLC-0006kB-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 10:29:50 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Robert Klein Reply-To: RoKlein@roklein.de Organization: roklein.de To: Sandro Tolaini , Release Engineers , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:31:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 Cc: re@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> In-Reply-To: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200208011031.50355.RoKlein@roklein.de> Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Risking to put my foot into my mouth: > Just a question about ports: I saw that the ports tree has the matching tag > for 4.6.1 release at the same revisions of 4.6 (that is, ports bundled with > 4.6.1 release CDs will be the same packaged with 4.6). I think that ports > bundled with 4.6.2 should be more recent. As far as I know, the Release Candidates used the ports for 4.6 (after all, they're release _candidates_). I remember having read somewhere (qa-freebsd list?), a package built of the current ports was being scheduled --- at a time, when 4.6.1 still was scheduled. Especially in the light, of some ports being statically linked against now fixed libraries etc. I think you can trust re@ to meet the decision you desire. Regards, Robert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Thu Aug 1 1:55:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512AB37B405; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (www.freebsdmall.com [66.220.2.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A67F43E3B; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:55:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id A4A412E883; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:55:44 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Sandro Tolaini Cc: Release Engineers , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020801015544.U9619@freebsdmall.com> References: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com>; from sandro@focuseek.com on Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:12:34AM +0200 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:12:34AM +0200, Sandro Tolaini wrote: > Just a question about ports: I saw that the ports tree has the matching tag > for 4.6.1 release at the same revisions of 4.6 (that is, ports bundled with > 4.6.1 release CDs will be the same packaged with 4.6). I think that ports > bundled with 4.6.2 should be more recent. The RELEASE_4_6_1 tag in /ports is indeed very similar to the RELEASE_4_6_0 tag. This is necessary because of the huge amount of effort that portmgr@ and the entire ports team put into doing quality assurance work in the month leading up to a release. We can not simply use the current head of the ports/ tree, because many important packages are not building. It usually takes us WEEKS to get a package set put together for 4.X where both KDE and GNOME fully build. The only way we can provide a package set for our 4.6.X point release is if we base it off of the 4.6 ports tree, with as few modifications as possible. The packages are all being rebuilt on 4.6.2 machines so that they are linked with the new OpenSSL libraries, etc.. You can always see the build logs for the package cluster at http://bento.FreeBSD.org. You can also read a little about the setup in the releng-packages article. - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Thu Aug 1 2: 2:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9084537B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06F043E4A; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:02:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7192GUR047938; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:02:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7192GYn047937; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:02:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:02:16 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Murray Stokely Cc: Sandro Tolaini , Release Engineers , stable@freebsd.org, vendors@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020801090216.GD46812@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> <20020801015544.U9619@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020801015544.U9619@freebsdmall.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Murray, On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:55:44AM -0700, Murray Stokely wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:12:34AM +0200, Sandro Tolaini wrote: > > Just a question about ports: I saw that the ports tree has the matching= tag=20 > > for 4.6.1 release at the same revisions of 4.6 (that is, ports bundled = with=20 > > 4.6.1 release CDs will be the same packaged with 4.6). I think that por= ts=20 > > bundled with 4.6.2 should be more recent. >=20 > The RELEASE_4_6_1 tag in /ports is indeed very similar to the > RELEASE_4_6_0 tag. This is necessary because of the huge amount of > effort that portmgr@ and the entire ports team put into doing quality > assurance work in the month leading up to a release. We can not > simply use the current head of the ports/ tree, because many important > packages are not building. It usually takes us WEEKS to get a package > set put together for 4.X where both KDE and GNOME fully build. The > only way we can provide a package set for our 4.6.X point release is > if we base it off of the 4.6 ports tree, with as few modifications as > possible. >=20 > The packages are all being rebuilt on 4.6.2 machines so that they > are linked with the new OpenSSL libraries, etc.. >=20 > You can always see the build logs for the package cluster at > http://bento.FreeBSD.org. You can also read a little about the setup > in the releng-packages article. While I understand about the testing cycle taking weeks, does this mean that the apache/openssl/other vulnerable ports in 4.6-RELEASE are also not updated? I thought one of the goals of the in-between release was to fix these packages. Could you clarify this? --Stijn --=20 Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9SPkYY3r/tLQmfWcRAjypAJ9uuZfYNK+gNqfFmZSgBE1aOVIBUwCfQJSh N5/8ITrFkw2WQ1hRGY+JyuQ= =x6OA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Thu Aug 1 2: 5:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0124C37B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from goldrake.psitrust.com (adsl203-148-081.mclink.it [213.203.148.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C419043E70; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:05:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandro@focuseek.com) Received: from gundam.psitrust.com (gundam.psitrust.com [10.1.1.21]) by goldrake.psitrust.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g7194pT90412; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:04:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sandro@focuseek.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Sandro Tolaini Organization: psitrust.com To: Murray Stokely Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:05:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 Cc: Release Engineers , stable@FreeBSD.org, vendors@FreeBSD.org References: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> <20020801015544.U9619@freebsdmall.com> In-Reply-To: <20020801015544.U9619@freebsdmall.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200208011105.46391.sandro@focuseek.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thursday 01 August 2002 10:55, Murray Stokely wrote: > packages are not building. It usually takes us WEEKS to get a package > set put together for 4.X where both KDE and GNOME fully build. The > only way we can provide a package set for our 4.6.X point release is > if we base it off of the 4.6 ports tree, with as few modifications as > possible. It comes me to mind that KDE 3.0 in 4.6 has a non-working kdm. KDE 3.0.2 = seems=20 fine. Is KDE going to be updated? --=20 Cheers, Sandro Tolaini To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Thu Aug 1 2:49:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2D437B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (www.freebsdmall.com [66.220.2.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E276043E3B; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:49:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id B24DF2E884; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:49:18 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Sandro Tolaini Cc: Murray Stokely , Release Engineers , stable@FreeBSD.org, vendors@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020801024918.V9619@freebsdmall.com> References: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> <20020801015544.U9619@freebsdmall.com> <200208011105.46391.sandro@focuseek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200208011105.46391.sandro@focuseek.com>; from sandro@focuseek.com on Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:05:46AM +0200 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:05:46AM +0200, Sandro Tolaini wrote: > It comes me to mind that KDE 3.0 in 4.6 has a non-working kdm. KDE 3.0.2 seems > fine. Is KDE going to be updated? That's up to Will with his portmgr@ and KDE maintainer hats on. - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Thu Aug 1 2:51:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4265D37B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (www.freebsdmall.com [66.220.2.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED03343E3B; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:51:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id 980652E883; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:51:36 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Stijn Hoop Cc: Murray Stokely , Sandro Tolaini , Release Engineers , stable@freebsd.org, vendors@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 Message-ID: <20020801025136.W9619@freebsdmall.com> References: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> <20020801015544.U9619@freebsdmall.com> <20020801090216.GD46812@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020801090216.GD46812@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>; from stijn@win.tue.nl on Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:02:16AM +0200 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:02:16AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > While I understand about the testing cycle taking weeks, does this > mean that the apache/openssl/other vulnerable ports in 4.6-RELEASE are If you look at the diff of the ports tree between RELEASE_4_6_1 and RELEASE_4_6_0, you will see that the apache ports have been updated. It is our intention to ship the updated Apache, SSL, and SSH. - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Thu Aug 1 7:30:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C42C37B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 07:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383F143E6E; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 07:30:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g71EUgu57329; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:30:43 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:30:42 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Murray Stokely , Cc: Stijn Hoop , Sandro Tolaini , Release Engineers , , Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: <20020801025136.W9619@freebsdmall.com> Message-ID: <20020801182922.G51416-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: MS> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:02:16AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: MS> > While I understand about the testing cycle taking weeks, does this MS> > mean that the apache/openssl/other vulnerable ports in 4.6-RELEASE are MS> MS> If you look at the diff of the ports tree between RELEASE_4_6_1 and MS> RELEASE_4_6_0, you will see that the apache ports have been updated. MS> It is our intention to ship the updated Apache, SSL, and SSH. Please rebuild misc/screen also, as 4.6-R version eats CPU for some dark reason. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-vendors Thu Aug 1 7:35:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-vendors@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD84537B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 07:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pump3.york.ac.uk (pump3.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA2343E6E; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 07:35:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (ury.york.ac.uk [144.32.108.81]) by pump3.york.ac.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g71EZS503534; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:35:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (localhost.york.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g71EZSv6049630; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:35:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from localhost (gavin@localhost) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g71EZSoA049627; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:35:28 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: ury.york.ac.uk: gavin owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:35:28 +0100 (BST) From: Gavin Atkinson To: Dmitry Morozovsky Cc: Murray Stokely , , Release Engineers , , Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 In-Reply-To: <20020801182922.G51416-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: > > MS> If you look at the diff of the ports tree between RELEASE_4_6_1 and > MS> RELEASE_4_6_0, you will see that the apache ports have been updated. > MS> It is our intention to ship the updated Apache, SSL, and SSH. > > Please rebuild misc/screen also, as 4.6-R version eats CPU for some dark > reason. pr/39479 Gavin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-vendors" in the body of the message