From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 02:34:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6DB16A4CE; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:34:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BA843FCB; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:34:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1ASwEv-000Le2-Qb; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 12:34:13 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:52:46 -0800 . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 12:34:13 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: X-Bogosity: No [0.0%] cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I'm impressed! X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:34:17 -0000 > > Sounds like you tried the boot-only ISO. That one is to be used like > floppies were in the past -- boot it and point the sysinstall at your > favorite FTP mirror. close, i tried the 5.2-BETA-amd64-disc2.iso :-(, i chose that one because it was bigger! anyways, 5.2-BETA-amd64-miniinst.iso is installing quiet nicely. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 02:37:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3955F16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:37:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C09543FEC for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:37:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053082A8D5; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:37:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Adriaan de Groot In-Reply-To: <200312032348.16766.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 02:37:42 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20031207103742.053082A8D5@canning.wemm.org> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: floats in pthreads X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:37:43 -0000 Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Yaum al-Arbi'a 08 Shawwal 1424 22:43, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > I'll dig into the segvs shortly (as neither cmucl nor gcl wants to work > > > and music is more important than LISP). > > > > Does 'ogg123 -d null file.ogg' work? I'm mostly interested in the libkse > > case. The no-libmap case isn't particularly interesting unless it fails > > with libkse but works with libc_r. > > With kse (through libmap.conf) I get both bus errors and segmentation faults, > the segvs are: > > > #0 0x0000000200eeb8f8 in pthread_testcancel () from /usr/lib/libkse.so.1 > > the bus errors occur at the same place disassembly shows > > > 0x0000000200eeb8ec : mov $0x17e,%rax > 0x0000000200eeb8f3 : mov %rcx,%r10 > 0x0000000200eeb8f6 : syscall > 0x0000000200eeb8f8 : jb 0x200eeb8e0 > > 0x0000000200eeb8fa : retq > 0x0000000200eeb8fb : nop > > > I should note that I haven't rebuilt the whole world and rebooted, just libc > and libkse. I hope that's enough. It should have been, but the trace above is one of the things I thought I'd fixed. Can you please retest with a new kernel and a complete world? Either from RELENG_5_2 or -current, it doesn't matter which at this point. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 23:31:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8B416A4CE; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 23:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C01243FBD; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 23:31:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) hB87VRGZ044490; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 02:31:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hB87VRTM033224; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 02:31:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 02:31:27 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200312080731.hB87VRTM033224@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org: des set sender to Tinderbox using -f Sender: Tinderbox From: Tinderbox To: current@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: [releng_5_2 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:31:30 -0000 TB --- /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_2/amd64/amd64/lock: flock(): Operation not supported TB --- ERROR: unable to lock sandbox TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_2/amd64 TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_2/amd64/amd64 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 09:00:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AC316A4D5; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:00:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24D743FDD; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) hB8H02GZ058451; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:00:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hB8H02Uc013004; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:00:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:00:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200312081700.hB8H02Uc013004@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org: des set sender to Tinderbox using -f Sender: Tinderbox From: Tinderbox To: current@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: [releng_5_2 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 17:00:08 -0000 TB --- ERROR: /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_2/amd64/amd64: File exists TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_2 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 11:03:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A89116A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:03:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2141F43F93 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:01:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB8J1gFY056937 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:01:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hB8J1gBv056928 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:01:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:01:42 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200312081901.hB8J1gBv056928@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 19:03:10 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/11/26] amd64/59713 amd64 Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A5B16A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:43:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B7E43D30 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:43:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id hBA8hro8044104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:43:54 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id hBA8hrcF044101; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:43:53 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:43:53 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200312100843.hBA8hrcF044101@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: can't boot 5.1 CD X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:43:56 -0000 Has anyone gotten the error write failed, filesystem full panic: Going nowhere without my init! trying to boot the 5.1 distribution CD when the kernel tries to start /etc/init? The system is a Tyan K8W 2885 with two Opterons and a single 1 GB DDIM (until I have enough confidence in the hardware to plug in more $$$). The BIOS is dated 10/2/3. It does this even with no hard disk in the system. The CD drive is the primary device on the ATA cable (the hard disk is/will be on sATA). One note: I tried to use a HighPoint 1820 sATA controller (PCI-X, 64-bit) and the BTX loader crashed. I haven't tried to run on any AMD64 code yet obviously. I'm assuming I should get stock 5.1 for a few days first to prove the hardware before trying to build & run an AMD64 kernel. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 08:36:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B84016A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:36:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DD543D09 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:36:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0982A8D5; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:36:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: James Van Artsdalen In-Reply-To: <200312100843.hBA8hrcF044101@bigtex.jrv.org> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:36:16 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20031210163616.1B0982A8D5@canning.wemm.org> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't boot 5.1 CD X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:36:18 -0000 James Van Artsdalen wrote: > Has anyone gotten the error > > write failed, filesystem full > panic: Going nowhere without my init! > > trying to boot the 5.1 distribution CD when the kernel tries > to start /etc/init? Generally this is because /sbin/init (ie: sysinstall) segfaulted and aborted. I recall that there was some reason for doing this, but I do not remember what it was. I *think* it happens if sysinstall fails to detect any devices. I'm sure somebody else can correct me on this. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 09:15:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0887316A4CF for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:15:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD8343D29 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:15:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBAHF4Rm044698; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:15:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBAHF3ls044697; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:15:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:15:03 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: James Van Artsdalen Message-ID: <20031210171503.GF19222@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200312100843.hBA8hrcF044101@bigtex.jrv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312100843.hBA8hrcF044101@bigtex.jrv.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't boot 5.1 CD X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:15:08 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:43:53AM -0600, James Van Artsdalen wrote: > Has anyone gotten the error > > write failed, filesystem full > panic: Going nowhere without my init! > > trying to boot the 5.1 distribution CD when the kernel tries > to start /etc/init? Please try the 5.2 Beta or RC1. A LOT has stablized since 5.1. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 12:34:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A745C16A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:34:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.texoma.net (mail2.texoma.net [209.151.96.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 830C343D13 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:34:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: (qmail 16228 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 20:34:57 -0000 Received: from ppp-151-101-037.texoma.net (HELO texoma.net) (209.151.101.37) by mail2.texoma.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 20:34:57 -0000 Message-ID: <3FD783D0.7030206@texoma.net> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:36:32 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: amd64 freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:34:59 -0000 Hello, I just installed FreeBSD 5.2 from the beta iso onto my new dual Opteron 240 server. The server has the Arima RioWorks HDAMA motherboard, onboard Promise SATA RAID, onboard dual gb Broadcom 5702 nics. I have 4 250gb SATA drives and 4gb ram. I have attempted to install: Debian (unsuccessful, does not recognize hardware) NetBSD (unsuccessful, boot floppies and cd do not boot correctly) Gentoo Linux (successful but with issues) I currently run Gentoo on my desktop machine. I might be reconsidering my desktop decision after what I've seen here. :) The FreeBSD install (with the exception below) was quite a refreshing experience. The CD booted without problem, recognized all my hardware. It is the only install which recognized everything. It even recognized that the Promise RAID had two different arrays configured by the Promise BIOS. Gentoo didn't/doesn't recognize that at all. Impressive. :) The sysinstall program is a nice installer with plenty of helps. This is my first FreeBSD install and I am very pleased with my experience. My problem is that in the install it fails to get the selected packages. It installs the base and such correctly. I am left with a bootable system, but no XFree86 and other stuff. I get this message even after successfully downloading via ftp the base and other core stuff. "Unable to get packages/INDEX file from selected media." It says something about its probably not on the mirror. I am using the primary ftp mirrors and also #7. My initial thought was that the binary packages aren't available for amd64. So I tried to pkg_add -r cvsup This too gave me an error about no such file on the server. I've tried to read the docs and search the mailing list archives but haven't found where I am going wrong. Any help in getting the rest of the system installing would be greatly appreciated. I am very pleased and impressed thus far and look forward to completing this install. Thanks, Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 12:41:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E06516A4CE; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:41:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from out010.verizon.net (out010pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C36143D1F; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:41:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dfeustel@mindspring.com) Received: from daffy ([4.62.79.194]) by out010.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20031210204118.QNQC18505.out010.verizon.net@daffy>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:41:18 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Dave Feustel To: obrien@freebsd.org, James Van Artsdalen Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:42:55 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200312100843.hBA8hrcF044101@bigtex.jrv.org> <20031210171503.GF19222@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031210171503.GF19222@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200312101542.55851.dfeustel@mindspring.com> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out010.verizon.net from [4.62.79.194] at Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:41:18 -0600 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't boot 5.1 CD X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:41:22 -0000 Is there a projected release date for 5.2? Thanks, Dave Feustel On Wednesday 10 December 2003 12:15 pm, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:43:53AM -0600, James Van Artsdalen wrote: > > Has anyone gotten the error > > > > write failed, filesystem full > > panic: Going nowhere without my init! > > > > trying to boot the 5.1 distribution CD when the kernel tries > > to start /etc/init? > > Please try the 5.2 Beta or RC1. A LOT has stablized since 5.1. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 12:44:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F5716A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:44:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.texoma.net (mail1.texoma.net [209.151.96.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74D6443D1D for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:44:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: (qmail 29535 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 20:44:02 -0000 Received: from ppp-151-101-037.texoma.net (HELO texoma.net) (209.151.101.37) by mail1.texoma.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 20:44:02 -0000 Message-ID: <3FD785F2.9070907@texoma.net> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:45:38 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: amd64 freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:44:08 -0000 Hello, I just installed FreeBSD 5.2 from the beta iso onto my new dual Opteron 240 server. The server has the Arima RioWorks HDAMA motherboard, onboard Promise SATA RAID, onboard dual gb Broadcom 5702 nics. I have 4 250gb SATA drives and 4gb ram. I have attempted to install: Debian (unsuccessful, does not recognize hardware) NetBSD (unsuccessful, boot floppies and cd do not boot correctly) Gentoo Linux (successful but with issues) I currently run Gentoo on my desktop machine. I might be reconsidering my desktop decision after what I've seen here. :) The FreeBSD install (with the exception below) was quite a refreshing experience. The CD booted without problem, recognized all my hardware. It is the only install which recognized everything. It even recognized that the Promise RAID had two different arrays configured by the Promise BIOS. Gentoo didn't/doesn't recognize that at all. Impressive. :) The sysinstall program is a nice installer with plenty of helps. This is my first FreeBSD install and I am very pleased with my experience. My problem is that in the install it fails to get the selected packages. It installs the base and such correctly. I am left with a bootable system, but no XFree86 and other stuff. I get this message even after successfully downloading via ftp the base and other core stuff. "Unable to get packages/INDEX file from selected media." It says something about its probably not on the mirror. I am using the primary ftp mirrors and also #7. My initial thought was that the binary packages aren't available for amd64. So I tried to pkg_add -r cvsup This too gave me an error about no such file on the server. I've tried to read the docs and search the mailing list archives but haven't found where I am going wrong. Any help in getting the rest of the system installing would be greatly appreciated. I am very pleased and impressed thus far and look forward to completing this install. Thanks, Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 13:16:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD5816A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECA943D09 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:16:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id hBALG3o8070652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:16:03 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id hBALG3Zk070649; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:16:03 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:16:03 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200312102116.hBALG3Zk070649@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't boot 5.1 CD X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:16:10 -0000 Thanks, 5.2-beta-amd64 doesn't crash like that. However, the sATA controller onboard the Tyan K8W apparently isn't recognized by FreeBSD. I don't have a parallel ATA drive handy today. The HighPoint 1820 still causes a crash in the BTX loader whether or not there is a drive attached. This is a new controller design with an option ROM that is probably new code, and probably a new silicon architecture, so I don't know how critical this is beyond figuring out how to make BTX more defensive. On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:43:53AM -0600, James Van Artsdalen wrote: > Has anyone gotten the error > > write failed, filesystem full > panic: Going nowhere without my init! > > trying to boot the 5.1 distribution CD when the kernel tries > to start /etc/init? Please try the 5.2 Beta or RC1. A LOT has stablized since 5.1. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 18:00:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB7C16A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:00:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from cliff.hfs.usu.edu (cliff.hsg.usu.edu [129.123.47.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5949E43D2F for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:00:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Brent.Sears@hfs.usu.edu) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:58:37 -0700 Message-ID: <63012766825BD147910EA7CFA02A20BF84E70F@cliff.hsg.usu.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD Thread-Index: AcO/ioPC4i5QMoGsQq+k7zjoWs9mRw== From: "Brent Sears" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 02:00:54 -0000 Greetings, I am requesting an image of FreeBSD/amd64. Also any other related data would be nice to have. Thx Brent C. Sears Network Administrator Utah State University Housing and Food Services From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 20:30:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D95416A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228D743D21 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:30:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 32531 for multiple; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:23:55 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD7F220.702@texoma.net> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:27:12 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: amd64 freebsd References: <3FD785F2.9070907@texoma.net> In-Reply-To: <3FD785F2.9070907@texoma.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: Re: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:30:43 -0000 Please excuse the double post. I thought the first went to an incorrect email address. I decided I wasn't familiar enough with the FreeBSD package/ports/src process. So I am currently printing out the entire handbook for reading. I believe I was missing the making of the kernel and make world, etc. process. Hopefully after reading the handbook most of my lack of understanding will be taken care of. Thanks again. Jimmie Houchin Jimmie Houchin wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed FreeBSD 5.2 from the beta iso onto my new dual Opteron > 240 server. The server has the Arima RioWorks HDAMA motherboard, onboard > Promise SATA RAID, onboard dual gb Broadcom 5702 nics. I have 4 250gb > SATA drives and 4gb ram. > > I have attempted to install: > Debian (unsuccessful, does not recognize hardware) > NetBSD (unsuccessful, boot floppies and cd do not boot correctly) > Gentoo Linux (successful but with issues) > I currently run Gentoo on my desktop machine. > I might be reconsidering my desktop decision > after what I've seen here. :) > > The FreeBSD install (with the exception below) was quite a refreshing > experience. The CD booted without problem, recognized all my hardware. > It is the only install which recognized everything. > It even recognized that the Promise RAID had two different arrays > configured by the Promise BIOS. Gentoo didn't/doesn't recognize that at > all. Impressive. :) > > The sysinstall program is a nice installer with plenty of helps. > > This is my first FreeBSD install and I am very pleased with my experience. > > My problem is that in the install it fails to get the selected packages. > It installs the base and such correctly. I am left with a bootable > system, but no XFree86 and other stuff. > > I get this message even after successfully downloading via ftp the base > and other core stuff. > > "Unable to get packages/INDEX file from selected media." > > It says something about its probably not on the mirror. > I am using the primary ftp mirrors and also #7. > > My initial thought was that the binary packages aren't available for > amd64. So I tried to > > pkg_add -r cvsup > > This too gave me an error about no such file on the server. > > I've tried to read the docs and search the mailing list archives but > haven't found where I am going wrong. > > Any help in getting the rest of the system installing would be greatly > appreciated. > > I am very pleased and impressed thus far and look forward to completing > this install. > > Thanks, > > Jimmie Houchin > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 20:40:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C6516A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:40:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from tinyboot.careflow.com (tinyboot.careflow.com [65.119.139.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4374443D31 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:40:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owen@careflow.com) Received: by tinyboot.careflow.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B08AF7F8; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:40:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:40:48 -0500 From: Owen Becker To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031211044048.GA1175@careflow.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Linux emulation status X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:40:49 -0000 Anyone know what the status of running i386 linux binaries on FreeBSD/amd64? More specifically, has anyone gotten mozilla/firebird going? TIA, Owen From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 20:53:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E753816A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:53:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0858743D2B for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:53:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 34515 for multiple; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:46:56 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD7F786.7010208@texoma.net> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:50:14 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: amd64 freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: Partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:53:46 -0000 Hello, This isn't really a specifically amd64 question but here goes. Do I really need a 4gb swap partition/slice? I have 4gb ram. I am not really conversant with the FreeBSD way. I really want to use swap as little as possible. I hate allocating 4gb when I really hope the swap is used never or little. But I am naive as to FreeBSDs usage of swap. I want the best performance settings for my server. I have the Arima HDAMA board as was stated the sledge.freebsd.org server is. Does it really have 8gb+ swap space? This is my current partition structure. / 256mb /swap 4gb /usr 8gb /home 220gb (the rest) the original label suggestion was: / 256mb /swap 4gb /var 256mb /tmp 256mb /usr 228gb (the rest) Is 8gb enough for /usr for a server? It will have X and dev tools and server apps. Wisdom greatly appreciated. Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 03:55:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF8616A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 03:55:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [195.143.231.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D7D43D09 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 03:55:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (kvenmb@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBBBtQb0093773 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:55:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hBBBtQs2093772; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:55:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:55:26 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200312111155.hBBBtQs2093772@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3FD7F786.7010208@texoma.net> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-amd64 User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.9-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:55:30 -0000 Jimmie Houchin wrote: > This isn't really a specifically amd64 question but here goes. My answer isn't amd64 specific either. :-) > Do I really need a 4gb swap partition/slice? > I have 4gb ram. In that case you should have at least a little more than 4 Gbyte swap, because otherwise crashdumps won't work. If the kernel panics, an image of the RAM is written to the swap partition (by default) for debugging. That only works if the swap partition is at least as big as the RAM (actually a little more, because there's some overhead). >From your partition list it seems that you have a 250 Gb disk. In that case I think you can spend a few gigs for the swap. :-) Even if you don't expect the machine to swap/page during normal use, it's generally not a bad idea to have plenty of swap space, so there is sufficient room in case that something runs havok. If your run out of memory (RAM + swap), then you're in serious trouble, because the kernel starts killing processes randomly. (Well, actually not really randomly, but it has been my experience that it tends to kill the "wrong" processes. YMMV.) > This is my current partition structure. > > / 256mb > /swap 4gb > /usr 8gb > /home 220gb (the rest) > > the original label suggestion was: > > / 256mb > /swap 4gb > /var 256mb > /tmp 256mb > /usr 228gb (the rest) I'd recommend keeping /var seperate. Having it on the root partition is not a good idea. First, 256 Mbyte is probably too small for the root partition plus /var. Seconds, there is usually quite some write activity on /var (log files, PID files, spool files, editor backups, compiler temporary files etc.), while on the root partition there's usually near zero write activity. Putting them into separate partitions will improve performance and robustness. That's even more true on a server. For /tmp it might be beneficial to put it onto a memory file system (disk-backed vnode) instead of a physical partition on disk, especially with 4 Gbyte of RAM. > Is 8gb enough for /usr for a server? Depends on what kind of server it's going to be. :-) > It will have X and dev tools and server apps. 8 Gbyte is plenty for X and dev tools. As far as the server apps are concerned, it depends. Is it a web server, a database server, news, proxy, shell server, or whatever ... Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "C++ is over-complicated nonsense. And Bjorn Shoestrap's book a danger to public health. I tried reading it once, I was in recovery for months." -- Cliff Sarginson From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 04:32:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA2716A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:32:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4147943D09 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:32:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from localhost by pandora.cs.kun.nl via odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] with ESMTP id hBBCWG1o007153 (8.12.10/3.58); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:32:19 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: amd64 freebsd Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:09:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <3FD785F2.9070907@texoma.net> In-Reply-To: <3FD785F2.9070907@texoma.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200312111309.50250.adridg@cs.kun.nl> cc: Jimmie Houchin Subject: Re: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:32:26 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:32:26 -0000 Hey Jimmie, On Wednesday 10 December 2003 21:45, Jimmie Houchin wrote: > My problem is that in the install it fails to get the selected packages. > It installs the base and such correctly. I am left with a bootable > system, but no XFree86 and other stuff. As you may have noticed, there probably aren't many (any?) amd64 packages available. This means you'll have to install most things from source (not a big deal, that's what the FreeBSD ports collection is for). In particular, if you've installed the ports collection, you can cd /usr/ports and see what's there. INDEX lists all ninethousand-odd ports that are available. You might cd /usr/ports/misc/instant-workstation make && make install && make clean to get things started. I'd suggest cd /usr/ports/x11/kde3 make && make install && make clean as well, but that's a personal bias. This will suck down vast quantities of source code and compile it. Probably successfully (although with KDE, it's problematic due to recent updates that are needed to build on amd64). > pkg_add -r cvsup This brings us to updating. Try to web search for "why is cvsup written in modula-3". The modula-3 compiler hasn't been ported yet, so cvsup can't be compiled, and it's a pretty basic part of the infrastructure. I think it was David who provided a link to a working cvsup package (no GUI). Check the archives of this list. As an alternative, if you've got a spare i386 box sitting around, you could install FreeBSD on that too, and install the i386 cvsup package on it. Then use that cvsup to update the sources and ports trees (you can share source and ports trees with NFS). -- pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot If the door is ajar, can we fill it with door-jamb? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 04:32:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322B116A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:32:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB35E43D1D for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:32:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from localhost by pandora.cs.kun.nl via odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] with ESMTP id hBBCWG1q007153 (8.12.10/3.58); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:32:32 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: amd64 freebsd Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:30:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <3FD7F786.7010208@texoma.net> In-Reply-To: <3FD7F786.7010208@texoma.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200312111330.08052.adridg@cs.kun.nl> cc: Jimmie Houchin Subject: Re: Partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:32:36 -0000 On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:50, Jimmie Houchin wrote: > Do I really need a 4gb swap partition/slice? > I have 4gb ram. 8 is suggested, no? Certainly if you've got a 220G drive, you can afford that? The story is sort of this: the VM is optimized for the situation that there's twice as much swap as memory. If you never hit swap (I don't, and I've only got 1G RAM, but then again I only do 12-way parallel compiles of C++ code and no physics simulations or model checking) that's not so bad, but if you _do_ end up using lots of swap, this may slow you down. Also, I believe that in case of kernel panics, you can get a complete dump in swap if you want, which would mean that you need at least as much as you have memory. So much for the i-think-so and old wives' tales stuff. (original suggestion) > / 256mb > /swap 4gb > /var 256mb > /tmp 256mb > /usr 228gb (the rest) Tastes vary. First off, /var contains logs that can get pretty big if you're a serveer. For workstation use, this is much less important. If you don't have a seperate /home, it goes in /usr/home. A large /tmp is useful for big compile jobs. Put it on another partition if you're a server. Locally, filling up / isn't as bad. For just /usr, 3G is usually enough _if_ you clean up ports regularly, (or set WRKDIRPREFIX), and have a nice big /usr/local for all the addons. I prefer that setup, since it means I can backup and restore system stuff in /usr separately from addons and ports stuff in /usr/local. My personal setup is /dev/ad4s1a 989M 451M 459M 50% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/ad4s1d 989M 33M 877M 4% /var /dev/ad4s1e 19G 2.7G 15G 15% /usr /dev/ad4s1f 5.8G 1.0G 4.3G 19% /home-local /dev/ad4s1g 24G 8.4G 14G 38% /usr/local (see, no separate /tmp and I haven't cleaned it in a while) (/home-local is for when the NFS server is down) (note the usage in /usr) (/usr/local contains builds of Qt 3.[012] and KDE 3.[012]). Again, it's a matter of taste and you projected usage. -- pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot If the door is ajar, can we fill it with door-jamb? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 04:32:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92B516A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:32:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81ED043D13 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:32:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from localhost by pandora.cs.kun.nl via odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] with ESMTP id hBBCWG1p007153 (8.12.10/3.58); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:32:26 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:15:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <20031211044048.GA1175@careflow.com> In-Reply-To: <20031211044048.GA1175@careflow.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200312111315.05110.adridg@cs.kun.nl> cc: Owen Becker Subject: Re: Linux emulation status X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:32:47 -0000 Ho Owen, On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:40, Owen Becker wrote: > Anyone know what the status of running i386 linux binaries on > FreeBSD/amd64? More specifically, has anyone gotten mozilla/firebird > going? Peter wrote (a while back): I've been thinking about this for the last day or so. We also need to be able to run 32 bit linux binaries, probably more urgently than 64 bit linux binaries. The thought of having two linux emulators in the kernel gave me a headache. So that's a bit of a pain. The linux_base-8 port certainly hasn't been updated for amd64 (it claims to be i386 specific). And as long as there are still no loadable kernel modules for amd64, kldload linux isn't an option either. -- pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot If the door is ajar, can we fill it with door-jamb? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 05:46:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B1A16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 05:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3093043D21 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 05:46:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 58876 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:39:19 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD8744E.4020402@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:42:38 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200312111155.hBBBtQs2093772@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200312111155.hBBBtQs2093772@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: Re: Partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:46:10 -0000 Hello Oliver, Thanks for the reply. Oliver Fromme wrote: > Jimmie Houchin wrote: > > This isn't really a specifically amd64 question but here goes. > > My answer isn't amd64 specific either. :-) > > > Do I really need a 4gb swap partition/slice? > > I have 4gb ram. > > In that case you should have at least a little more than > 4 Gbyte swap, because otherwise crashdumps won't work. > If the kernel panics, an image of the RAM is written to > the swap partition (by default) for debugging. That only > works if the swap partition is at least as big as the RAM > (actually a little more, because there's some overhead). This is very informative. >>From your partition list it seems that you have a 250 Gb > disk. In that case I think you can spend a few gigs for > the swap. :-) > > Even if you don't expect the machine to swap/page during > normal use, it's generally not a bad idea to have plenty > of swap space, so there is sufficient room in case that > something runs havok. If your run out of memory (RAM + > swap), then you're in serious trouble, because the kernel > starts killing processes randomly. (Well, actually not > really randomly, but it has been my experience that it > tends to kill the "wrong" processes. YMMV.) Good information. I am grateful for the education. Then I guess the conventional wisdom of the 8gb (2*ram) would be appropriate? > > This is my current partition structure. > > > > / 256mb > > /swap 4gb > > /usr 8gb > > /home 220gb (the rest) > > > > the original label suggestion was: > > > > / 256mb > > /swap 4gb > > /var 256mb > > /tmp 256mb > > /usr 228gb (the rest) > > I'd recommend keeping /var seperate. Having it on the root > partition is not a good idea. First, 256 Mbyte is probably > too small for the root partition plus /var. Seconds, there > is usually quite some write activity on /var (log files, > PID files, spool files, editor backups, compiler temporary > files etc.), while on the root partition there's usually > near zero write activity. Putting them into separate > partitions will improve performance and robustness. > That's even more true on a server. I had originally planned on /var and /tmp being symlinked to the large /home partition, /home/var /home/tmp. That way they both have sufficient room and no impact on root. Is this a bad idea? > For /tmp it might be beneficial to put it onto a memory > file system (disk-backed vnode) instead of a physical > partition on disk, especially with 4 Gbyte of RAM. > > > Is 8gb enough for /usr for a server? > > Depends on what kind of server it's going to be. :-) Primarily web possibly/probably mail. At least to my naive thinking I plan on all/most of my data going to my /home partition and also to another 250gb mirrored pair when this is setup. I really only plan on /usr containing source, libs and apps as much as is within reason. > > It will have X and dev tools and server apps. > > 8 Gbyte is plenty for X and dev tools. As far as the > server apps are concerned, it depends. Is it a web > server, a database server, news, proxy, shell server, > or whatever ... Thanks, Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 06:01:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D3D16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:01:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D8C43D2F for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:01:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 60002 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:54:33 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD877DF.9010409@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:57:51 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adriaan de Groot References: <3FD785F2.9070907@texoma.net> <200312111309.50250.adridg@cs.kun.nl> In-Reply-To: <200312111309.50250.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: amd64 freebsd Subject: Re: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:01:24 -0000 Hello Adriaan, Thanks for the reply. Adriaan de Groot wrote: > Hey Jimmie, > > On Wednesday 10 December 2003 21:45, Jimmie Houchin wrote: > >>My problem is that in the install it fails to get the selected packages. >>It installs the base and such correctly. I am left with a bootable >>system, but no XFree86 and other stuff. > > As you may have noticed, there probably aren't many (any?) amd64 packages > available. This means you'll have to install most things from source (not a > big deal, that's what the FreeBSD ports collection is for). In particular, if > you've installed the ports collection, you can > > cd /usr/ports > > and see what's there. INDEX lists all ninethousand-odd ports that are > available. You might > > cd /usr/ports/misc/instant-workstation > make && make install && make clean > > to get things started. I'd suggest > > cd /usr/ports/x11/kde3 > make && make install && make clean > > as well, but that's a personal bias. Oh no, KDE? On my server? There goes lean and mean. ;) Okay. Thanks for the above info. I have been using Gentoo Linux for a couple of years on my desktop. Maybe not for long. FreeBSD is looking pretty sweet. :) It is also source based. But it has a Python program called emerge for its system called portage which handles make, install and dependencies. The above should get me going. Is there any way to tell what all will get installed when I make something? Or do I need to take care of dependencies myself? I'm used to Debian and Gentoo and not familiar with how FreeBSD handles dependencies and such. > This will suck down vast quantities of source code and compile it. Probably > successfully (although with KDE, it's problematic due to recent updates that > are needed to build on amd64). > >>pkg_add -r cvsup > > This brings us to updating. Try to web search for "why is cvsup written in > modula-3". The modula-3 compiler hasn't been ported yet, so cvsup can't be > compiled, and it's a pretty basic part of the infrastructure. I think it was > David who provided a link to a working cvsup package (no GUI). Check the > archives of this list. Peter has cvsup-without-gui on his FreeBSD site. I just haven't been able to get it. To my understanding I currently only have the ftp program on my machine. I don't know how to use it to get the package. After I make the above I'll make wget if it wasn't done already and fetch Peter's cvsup-without-gui. > As an alternative, if you've got a spare i386 box sitting around, you could > install FreeBSD on that too, and install the i386 cvsup package on it. Then > use that cvsup to update the sources and ports trees (you can share source > and ports trees with NFS). Well I have an Athlon 700mhz desktop, which I am considerig switching to FreeBSD after I move some data off of the spare drive. Can FreeBSD read from a Linux ReiserFS partition to copy my /home dir over to a fresh FreeBSD install? These machines are currently on a LAN but not after I finish development. Thanks for the help and all the suggestions. Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 06:08:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6B016A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mandarin.fruitsalad.org (pc117.net160.koping.net [81.16.160.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA1A43D38 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:08:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@hasta.se) Received: from [192.168.15.46] (helo=klementin) by mandarin.fruitsalad.org with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AURUE-0005l8-6y; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:08:14 +0100 From: "Matt Douhan" To: "Jimmie Houchin" , "Adriaan de Groot" Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:08:21 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3FD877DF.9010409@texoma.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal cc: amd64 freebsd Subject: SV: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:08:26 -0000 >Is there any way to tell what all will get installed when I make >something? Or do I need to take care of dependencies myself? >I'm used to Debian and Gentoo and not familiar with how FreeBSD handles >dependencies and such. It is handled automatically by the ports system >Peter has cvsup-without-gui on his FreeBSD site. >I just haven't been able to get it. >To my understanding I currently only have the ftp program on my machine. >I don't know how to use it to get the package. pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui rgds Matt From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 06:13:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD78E16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:13:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAB643D2A for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:13:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 61072 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:06:24 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD87AA6.7030106@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:09:42 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adriaan de Groot References: <3FD7F786.7010208@texoma.net> <200312111330.08052.adridg@cs.kun.nl> In-Reply-To: <200312111330.08052.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: amd64 freebsd Subject: Re: Partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:13:16 -0000 Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:50, Jimmie Houchin wrote: > >>Do I really need a 4gb swap partition/slice? >>I have 4gb ram. > > 8 is suggested, no? Conventionally yes. But strangely enough the label program only did 4096mb in its original suggestion. So I wasn't sure if it had different understanding with large amounts of ram. > Certainly if you've got a 220G drive, you can afford that? If I need to, yes. But I just didn't like the thought of idle space which could be used. When I "naively" hoped swap would be used sparingly. > The story is sort of this: the VM is optimized for the situation that there's > twice as much swap as memory. If you never hit swap (I don't, and I've only > got 1G RAM, but then again I only do 12-way parallel compiles of C++ code and > no physics simulations or model checking) that's not so bad, but if you _do_ > end up using lots of swap, this may slow you down. Also, I believe that in > case of kernel panics, you can get a complete dump in swap if you want, which > would mean that you need at least as much as you have memory. > > So much for the i-think-so and old wives' tales stuff. Well it looks like I should ere (if it be such) on the side of safety and precaution. 8gb it is. > (original suggestion) > >>/ 256mb >>/swap 4gb >>/var 256mb >>/tmp 256mb >>/usr 228gb (the rest) > > > Tastes vary. First off, /var contains logs that can get pretty big if you're a > serveer. For workstation use, this is much less important. If you don't have > a seperate /home, it goes in /usr/home. A large /tmp is useful for big > compile jobs. Put it on another partition if you're a server. Locally, > filling up / isn't as bad. For just /usr, 3G is usually enough _if_ you clean > up ports regularly, (or set WRKDIRPREFIX), and have a nice big /usr/local for > all the addons. I prefer that setup, since it means I can backup and restore > system stuff in /usr separately from addons and ports stuff in /usr/local. > > My personal setup is > > /dev/ad4s1a 989M 451M 459M 50% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/ad4s1d 989M 33M 877M 4% /var > /dev/ad4s1e 19G 2.7G 15G 15% /usr > /dev/ad4s1f 5.8G 1.0G 4.3G 19% /home-local > /dev/ad4s1g 24G 8.4G 14G 38% /usr/local > > (see, no separate /tmp and I haven't cleaned it in a while) (/home-local is > for when the NFS server is down) (note the usage in /usr) (/usr/local > contains builds of Qt 3.[012] and KDE 3.[012]). > > Again, it's a matter of taste and you projected usage. Thanks for the information. I'll chew on it awhile. I have been planning on symlinking /var and /tmp to my /home dir. I'll do a fresh install this afternoon with an updated partion scheme. Thanks. Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 06:16:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D99616A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:16:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A292043D29 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:16:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 61420 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:09:58 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD87B7C.6050608@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:13:16 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Douhan References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: amd64 freebsd Subject: Re: SV: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:16:47 -0000 Matt Douhan wrote: >>Is there any way to tell what all will get installed when I make >>something? Or do I need to take care of dependencies myself? >>I'm used to Debian and Gentoo and not familiar with how FreeBSD handles >>dependencies and such. > > It is handled automatically by the ports system Good. :) I know FreeBSD was much of the inspiration for the Gentoo main developer. >>Peter has cvsup-without-gui on his FreeBSD site. >>I just haven't been able to get it. >>To my understanding I currently only have the ftp program on my machine. >>I don't know how to use it to get the package. > > pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui That has failed with something like no such file on server error. But I'm about to do a fresh install this afternoon/evening after I redo my partions and will try again. Thanks, Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 07:41:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A1916A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:41:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6EF43D09 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:41:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBBFfcRm059139; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:41:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBBFfZZT059138; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:41:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:41:29 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Owen Becker Message-ID: <20031211154129.GA58813@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20031211044048.GA1175@careflow.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031211044048.GA1175@careflow.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation status X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:41:56 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:40:48PM -0500, Owen Becker wrote: > Anyone know what the status of running i386 linux binaries on > FreeBSD/amd64? Peter Wemm and I have agreed that the priority for running binaries is: 1. FreeBSD/i386 ELF 2. 32-bit i386 Linux ELF 3. 64-bit amd64 Linux ELF of course someone may have other priorities and work on things in a different order. > More specifically, has anyone gotten mozilla/firebird going? Unfortunately, the Mozilla developers have depended on having carnal knowledge of GCC's internal C++ ABI and exception mechanism. I don't understand why, but this makes it rather hard to port to new architectures. I have some patches for Mozilla 1.4 with GCC 3.2. I started working on porting them, but December has become my work month from hell. It is important to me to get these into the Mozilla CVS tree for 1.6/0.8. Peter mentioned there seems to be some patches in the Mozilla bugzilla that might cover GCC 3.3. If someone is bored and wanted to spend some time on it... all I ask is that if someone does port them, to post the patches and give me a chance to Sheppard them into the Mozilla CVS tree so things are as AMD would like them to be (naming, etc...). -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 07:44:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743E216A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:44:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE84243D1D for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:44:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBBFhuRm059159; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:43:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBBFhr1i059157; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:43:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:43:53 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Adriaan de Groot Message-ID: <20031211154352.GB58813@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20031211044048.GA1175@careflow.com> <200312111315.05110.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312111315.05110.adridg@cs.kun.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Owen Becker cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation status X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:44:17 -0000 On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:15:05PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > Peter wrote (a while back): > > I've been thinking about this for the last day or so. We also need to > be able to run 32 bit linux binaries, probably more urgently than 64 bit > linux binaries. The thought of having two linux emulators in the kernel > gave me a headache. > > So that's a bit of a pain. The linux_base-8 port certainly hasn't been updated > for amd64 (it claims to be i386 specific). And as long as there are still no > loadable kernel modules for amd64, kldload linux isn't an option either. The Linux we really should base this on is SUSE Linux 9.0. Fedora c2 if we really have to. There really aren't many programs that are AMD64 Linux that utilize the extra functionality of 64-bit'ness. So I think we've some breathing room here until the need for AMD64 Linux compat becomes pressing. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 07:48:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83B816A4EA for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:48:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB2043D2F for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:48:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBBFm7Rm059239; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:48:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBBFlvJi059234; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:47:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:47:57 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Adriaan de Groot Message-ID: <20031211154757.GC58813@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <3FD7F786.7010208@texoma.net> <200312111330.08052.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312111330.08052.adridg@cs.kun.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Jimmie Houchin cc: amd64 freebsd Subject: Re: Partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:48:34 -0000 On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:30:08PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:50, Jimmie Houchin wrote: > > Do I really need a 4gb swap partition/slice? > > I have 4gb ram. > > 8 is suggested, no? Certainly if you've got a 220G drive, you can afford that? > The story is sort of this: the VM is optimized for the situation that there's > twice as much swap as memory. I'm not aware that was ever the case, and if it was in 4.3BSD, I don't think that is the case in 5-FreeBSD. Unless a vm hacker tells me otherwise, I think 1.1 times RAM is a sufficient rule with one has 4-8GB RAM and no other reason to believe on needs more swap. 1.1 times is the space for crashdumps, and the need for that has already been told. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 07:54:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039EA16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:54:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F8C43D2B for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:54:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBBFsbRm059346; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:54:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBBFsbtH059345; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:54:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:54:37 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Brent Sears Message-ID: <20031211155437.GD58813@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <63012766825BD147910EA7CFA02A20BF84E70F@cliff.hsg.usu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63012766825BD147910EA7CFA02A20BF84E70F@cliff.hsg.usu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:54:40 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:58:37PM -0700, Brent Sears wrote: > Greetings, > I am requesting an image of FreeBSD/amd64. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/5.2/ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 07:58:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B980916A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDA343D2C for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:58:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl by pandora.cs.kun.nl id hBBFwa1p007803 (8.12.10/3.58); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:58:36 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:58:36 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20031211154352.GB58813@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Linux emulation status X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: adridg@cs.kun.nl List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:58:39 -0000 On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > The Linux we really should base this on is SUSE Linux 9.0. Fedora c2 if > we really have to. There really aren't many programs that are AMD64 > Linux that utilize the extra functionality of 64-bit'ness. So I think > we've some breathing room here until the need for AMD64 Linux compat > becomes pressing. Just to get this straight: does that mean that "we" (that's you, David, along with Peter) have chosen to do linux i386 32-bit ABI emulation first and to wait-and-see for the amd64 (x86_64 in linuxland) ABI emulation? Is there any hope of it being there "soon"? -- Adriaan de Groot adridg@cs.kun.nl Kamer A6020 024-3652272 GPG Key Fingerprint 934E 31AA 80A7 723F 54F9 50ED 76AC EE01 FEA2 A3FE http://www.cs.kun.nl/~adridg/research/ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 08:03:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0046416A4D2 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from wn1.sci.kun.nl (wn1.sci.kun.nl [131.174.8.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F5E43D2A for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:03:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@sci.kun.nl) Received: from wn4.sci.kun.nl by wn1.sci.kun.nl id hBBG3k5w015982 (8.12.10/3.58); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:03:46 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:03:46 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: (NM) Re: Linux emulation status X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: adridg@cs.kun.nl List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:03:49 -0000 On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > Just to get this straight: does that mean that "we" (that's you, David, > along with Peter) have chosen to do linux i386 32-bit ABI emulation first > and to wait-and-see for the amd64 (x86_64 in linuxland) ABI emulation? Is > there any hope of it being there "soon"? Feh, just read David's other message on this subject. Damn cc's. With i386-freebsd ABI compatibility, we'll finally have a working cvsup again, won't we (barring someone porting ezm3) ? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 09:48:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8E516A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:48:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6E343D2D for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:48:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id hBBHlqA7017368; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:47:52 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id hBBHlpkZ017367; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:47:51 -0800 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:47:51 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Adriaan de Groot Message-ID: <20031211174751.GA15174@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20031211044048.GA1175@careflow.com> <200312111315.05110.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312111315.05110.adridg@cs.kun.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: Owen Becker cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation status X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:48:05 -0000 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:15:05PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > So that's a bit of a pain. The linux_base-8 port certainly hasn't been > updated for amd64 (it claims to be i386 specific). And as long as > there are still no loadable kernel modules for amd64, kldload linux > isn't an option either. I'm starting to think we should make the linux_base-# ports into meta ports which pull in linux_base_ ports. At the very least we will need seperate linux-i386 and linux-amd64 ports for amd64 machines and I wouldn't be all the suprised to see similar issues crop up on other architectures which support 32-bit and 64-bit in some way. (PPC and MIPS seem like the most likely places this would happen). -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/2K3GXY6L6fI4GtQRAovnAKDBz3nvNtP6ilQTEOvHwjXV7Rt5dgCeKchc PwSGTAWKVqkPw2Bxk/zLw+o= =jsRr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 14:37:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0988616A4CE; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:37:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail1.cableone.net [24.116.0.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBB643E8C; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:37:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail1.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 1352349 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:35:09 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD8F0B0.20505@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:33:20 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <3FD7F786.7010208@texoma.net> <200312111330.08052.adridg@cs.kun.nl> <20031211154757.GC58813@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031211154757.GC58813@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: amd64 freebsd Subject: Re: Partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:37:49 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:30:08PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > >>On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:50, Jimmie Houchin wrote: >> >>>Do I really need a 4gb swap partition/slice? >>>I have 4gb ram. >> >>8 is suggested, no? Certainly if you've got a 220G drive, you can afford that? >>The story is sort of this: the VM is optimized for the situation that there's >>twice as much swap as memory. > > > I'm not aware that was ever the case, and if it was in 4.3BSD, I don't > think that is the case in 5-FreeBSD. Unless a vm hacker tells me > otherwise, I think 1.1 times RAM is a sufficient rule with one has 4-8GB > RAM and no other reason to believe on needs more swap. 1.1 times is the > space for crashdumps, and the need for that has already been told. Great! I am more than happy to pocket the extra 3.5gb. I don't think I will but, if I added more ram later... Can I have my 1.1*ram swap on multiple partitions? Thanks for this info. Jimmie From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 14:51:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A6616A4CE; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:51:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail1.cableone.net [24.116.0.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719B743D9D; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:51:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail1.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 1354163 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:49:47 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD8F41C.8060402@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:47:56 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <20031211044048.GA1175@careflow.com> <20031211154129.GA58813@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031211154129.GA58813@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: Owen Becker cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation status X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:51:55 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:40:48PM -0500, Owen Becker wrote: > >>Anyone know what the status of running i386 linux binaries on >>FreeBSD/amd64? > > > Peter Wemm and I have agreed that the priority for running binaries is: > 1. FreeBSD/i386 ELF > 2. 32-bit i386 Linux ELF > 3. 64-bit amd64 Linux ELF > > of course someone may have other priorities and work on things in a > different order. How far off is number 1? I presume this means I am not able to compile and run 32bit apps currently? One of the apps I am interested may not be 64bit clean. In Gentoo I had to enter the 32bit dev environment to compile it. I haven't been able to do that successfully on Gentoo yet. That is one of the reasons I went exploring FreeBSD. Not the only one tho'. :) Actually if FreeBSD AMD64 was tier 1 when I got my machine I may have never tried the Gentoo port. >>More specifically, has anyone gotten mozilla/firebird going? > > Unfortunately, the Mozilla developers have depended on having carnal > knowledge of GCC's internal C++ ABI and exception mechanism. I don't > understand why, but this makes it rather hard to port to new > architectures. Gentoo AMD64 has mozilla running. > I have some patches for Mozilla 1.4 with GCC 3.2. I started working on > porting them, but December has become my work month from hell. It is > important to me to get these into the Mozilla CVS tree for 1.6/0.8. > Peter mentioned there seems to be some patches in the Mozilla bugzilla > that might cover GCC 3.3. If someone is bored and wanted to spend some > time on it... all I ask is that if someone does port them, to post the > patches and give me a chance to Sheppard them into the Mozilla CVS tree so > things are as AMD would like them to be (naming, etc...). Gentoo AMD64 is using gcc 3.3.2. I don't know if any of the Gentoo AMD64 work towards mozilla is of any benefit to FreeBSD or not. I am not a C/C++ programmer. :) Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 15:23:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F89C16A4CE; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:23:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82F143D1D; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:23:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C116F2A8F1; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:23:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: obrien@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20031211154129.GA58813@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:23:47 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20031211232347.C116F2A8F1@canning.wemm.org> cc: Owen Becker cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux emulation status X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:23:48 -0000 "David O'Brien" wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:40:48PM -0500, Owen Becker wrote: > > More specifically, has anyone gotten mozilla/firebird going? > > Unfortunately, the Mozilla developers have depended on having carnal > knowledge of GCC's internal C++ ABI and exception mechanism. I don't > understand why, but this makes it rather hard to port to new > architectures. Just as a BTW; I have a horrible suspicion that something is broken in the dynamic linker. I've found one program (xpdf) that fails when dynamically linked, but works when statically linked. I do not yet understand what is going on but I'm pretty sure the runtime binding is corrupting function call state. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 17:37:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5E416A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:37:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84E643D1F for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:37:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id hBC1bTo8045230 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:37:29 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id hBC1bTLs045227; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:37:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:37:29 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200312120137.hBC1bTLs045227@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't boot 5.1 CD X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:37:35 -0000 The AMD64 5.2 beta ISO worked fine. It seems very stable. My problem was that all of the disk controllers I was trying were not supported. Is there a source tree I should track via CVSUP or whatever? There seems to be an issue with the sysctl call. The x86 DNETC binary actually runs until it gets an error from a sysctl call, probably kern.ostype or kern.osrelease, and systat prints an error message complaining sysctl(hw.intrcnt...) failed: Cannot allocate memory when the :vmstat command is given (at the next screen update). Has anyone looked into this? Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:15:03 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" Subject: Re: can't boot 5.1 CD To: James Van Artsdalen Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:43:53AM -0600, James Van Artsdalen wrote: > Has anyone gotten the error > > write failed, filesystem full > panic: Going nowhere without my init! > > trying to boot the 5.1 distribution CD when the kernel tries > to start /etc/init? Please try the 5.2 Beta or RC1. A LOT has stablized since 5.1. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 18:20:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A5916A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F03943D09 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:20:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlfenton@citlink.net) Received: (qmail 20366 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 02:20:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO citlink.net) ([67.136.208.39]) (envelope-sender ) by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 12 Dec 2003 02:20:23 -0000 Message-ID: <3FD925F1.1070207@citlink.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:20:33 -0700 From: Joe Fenton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <20031211200037.37CDD16A4D8@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20031211200037.37CDD16A4D8@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:20:27 -0000 > Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > > On Wednesday 10 December 2003 21:45, Jimmie Houchin wrote: > > > > As an alternative, if you've got a spare i386 box sitting around, you could > > install FreeBSD on that too, and install the i386 cvsup package on it. Then > > use that cvsup to update the sources and ports trees (you can share source > > and ports trees with NFS). > > Well I have an Athlon 700mhz desktop, which I am considerig switching to > FreeBSD after I move some data off of the spare drive. http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/05/09/Big_Scary_Daemons.html This shows how to make a dual-boot setup. In this case, he is setting up his computer to boot FreeBSD -current or FreeBSD -release. Use the same method to set up FreeBSD i3686 and FreeBSD amd64. I did that on my Opteron workstation. If strange things happen in amd64, you can reboot into i386 and try to figure things out from there. Set up three slices - one for i386, one for amd64, and a common slice. This same site has a very good article on setting up your FreeBSD to handle kernel panics using the swap partition as has been mentioned a few times recently. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 18:43:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DC116A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:43:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail1.cableone.net [24.116.0.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BBD43D1F for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:43:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail1.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 1377939 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:40:47 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD92A43.5080205@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:38:59 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: amd64 freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: kernel compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:43:29 -0000 Hello, I just did a fresh install. I edited a configuration for my kernel. When attempting to compile this kernel I get this error. I could have very well done something wrong in my configuration to cause this. /usr/src/sys/dev/pst/pst-iop.c: In function 'iop_intr': /usr/src/sys/dev/pst/pst-iop.c:196 warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size /usr/src/sys/dev/pst/pst-iop.c: In function 'iop_done': /usr/src/sys/dev/pst/pst-iop.c:417 warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size /usr/src/sys/dev/pst/pst-iop.c: In function 'iop_queue_wait_msg': /usr/src/sys/dev/pst/pst-iop.c:434 warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ***Error code 1 Stop... Stop... Stop... # Also... When reading the NOTES for configuring a kernel it speaks about a ULE scheduler for SMP systems. It says that the BSD scheduler isn't very good for SMP systems. But I don't find an option for the ULE scheduler. Is it not ready for primetime on the AMD64? Is it still okay to use the BSD scheduler for SMP? And... In the RAID configuration (I think) it had a Promise SX6000 support. I have the Promise onboard SATA RAID controller. I didn't see explicit Promise SATA support but I know it is somewhere because I and FreeBSD are using it. Is the support coming from the SX6000 kernel option? Any help and information greatly appreciated. Thanks. Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 18:47:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEA816A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:47:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail1.cableone.net [24.116.0.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0072D43D41 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:47:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail1.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 1378420 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:45:24 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD92B58.4040301@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:43:36 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Fenton References: <20031211200037.37CDD16A4D8@hub.freebsd.org> <3FD925F1.1070207@citlink.net> In-Reply-To: <3FD925F1.1070207@citlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:47:32 -0000 Joe Fenton wrote: >> Adriaan de Groot wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 10 December 2003 21:45, Jimmie Houchin wrote: >>> >>> As an alternative, if you've got a spare i386 box sitting around, >>> you could install FreeBSD on that too, and install the i386 cvsup >>> package on it. Then use that cvsup to update the sources and >>> ports trees (you can share source and ports trees with NFS). >> >> Well I have an Athlon 700mhz desktop, which I am considerig switching to >> FreeBSD after I move some data off of the spare drive. > > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/05/09/Big_Scary_Daemons.html > > This shows how to make a dual-boot setup. In this case, he is setting up > his computer to boot FreeBSD -current or FreeBSD -release. Use the > same method to set up FreeBSD i3686 and FreeBSD amd64. I did that > on my Opteron workstation. If strange things happen in amd64, you can > reboot into i386 and try to figure things out from there. > > Set up three slices - one for i386, one for amd64, and a common slice. > > This same site has a very good article on setting up your FreeBSD to handle > kernel panics using the swap partition as has been mentioned a few times > recently. Hi Joe, Thanks for the information. I had seen something somewhere about that article but forgot to go read it. I'll definitely take a look. Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 18:52:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483FE16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:52:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail1.cableone.net [24.116.0.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407FE43D35 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:52:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: from texoma.net (unverified [24.116.250.217]) by smail1.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.5d2) with ESMTP id 1378894 for multiple; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:49:59 -0700 Message-ID: <3FD92C6B.6090302@texoma.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:48:11 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031203 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adriaan de Groot References: <3FD785F2.9070907@texoma.net> <200312111309.50250.adridg@cs.kun.nl> In-Reply-To: <200312111309.50250.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: amd64 freebsd Subject: Re: Packages/Ports problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:52:33 -0000 Adriaan de Groot wrote: [snip] > and see what's there. INDEX lists all ninethousand-odd ports that are > available. You might > > cd /usr/ports/misc/instant-workstation > make && make install && make clean This fails due to no acroread for amd64. :( Any solution? Thanks. Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 21:02:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E445F16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D285D43D35 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:02:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBC52cRm065846; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:02:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBC52bM6065845; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:02:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:02:37 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jimmie Houchin Message-ID: <20031212050237.GA65824@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <3FD7F786.7010208@texoma.net> <200312111330.08052.adridg@cs.kun.nl> <20031211154757.GC58813@dragon.nuxi.com> <3FD8F0B0.20505@texoma.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FD8F0B0.20505@texoma.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: amd64 freebsd Subject: Re: Partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:02:44 -0000 On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 04:33:20PM -0600, Jimmie Houchin wrote: > Can I have my 1.1*ram swap on multiple partitions? Nope. The dump code only knows how to write into a single contigious partition. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 00:23:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4AD16A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:23:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1930E43D1D for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:23:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id hBC8N7o8074272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:23:07 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id hBC8N6Ai074269; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:23:06 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:23:06 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200312120823.hBC8N6Ai074269@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: bge usage of bus_dma_tag_create? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:23:09 -0000 I am confused by this code in sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c. Are the values for the lowaddr and highaddr args to bus_dma_tag_create () swapped? The ata and aha drivers seem to have lowaddr <= highaddr, but on AMD64 that's not true below. static int bge_dma_alloc(dev) device_t dev; { struct bge_softc *sc; int nseg, i, error; struct bge_dmamap_arg ctx; sc = device_get_softc(dev); /* * Allocate the parent bus DMA tag appropriate for PCI. */ #define BGE_NSEG_NEW 32 error = bus_dma_tag_create(NULL, /* parent */ PAGE_SIZE, 0, /* alignment, boundary */ BUS_SPACE_MAXADDR, /* lowaddr */ BUS_SPACE_MAXADDR_32BIT,/* highaddr */ NULL, NULL, /* filter, filterarg */ MAXBSIZE, BGE_NSEG_NEW, /* maxsize, nsegments */ BUS_SPACE_MAXSIZE_32BIT,/* maxsegsize */ BUS_DMA_ALLOCNOW, /* flags */ NULL, NULL, /* lockfunc, lockarg */ &sc->bge_cdata.bge_parent_tag); From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 02:21:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9B916A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:21:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8A343D2D for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:21:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBCAMCeV021230 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:22:12 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:22:12 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031212.192212.730556731.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org From: Nakata Maho Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: AMD64 Installation succesful for Tyan S2885 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:21:13 -0000 Hello, I installed FreeBSD 5.2-BETA using following configuration: o Opteron 242 (1.6G) x 2 o Tyan Thunder K8W S2885 o 512M x 4 ECC registered PC2700 (attached symmetrically) I encountered systematic reboot with some naughty DRAM modules, and replacing them makes me happy. Thanks for your hard works! --maho From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 07:08:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CFC16A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.texoma.net (mail1.texoma.net [209.151.96.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0415F43D1D for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:08:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhouchin@texoma.net) Received: (qmail 31564 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 15:08:03 -0000 Received: from ppp-151-100-066.texoma.net (HELO texoma.net) (209.151.100.66) by mail1.texoma.net with SMTP; 12 Dec 2003 15:08:03 -0000 Message-ID: <3FD9DA80.6070809@texoma.net> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:10:56 -0600 From: Jimmie Houchin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: amd64 freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Promise SATA code X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:08:05 -0000 When I was in the installer selecting disks and partitions for the install it could see the the arrays I had setup with the controllers BIOS. To make sure (for myself) that it was truly seeing the arrays I rebooted and changed the arrays and it saw the new arrangement. Nice. I did not have this experience with the Gentoo AMD64. Can anybody tell where the code(driver) is that handles my controller. I have the Arima HDAMA motherboard with onboard Promise SATA RAID. Any help apprreciated. Thanks. Jimmie Houchin From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 11:44:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1191D16A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:44:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FAB43D09 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:44:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (qmail 1017 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 19:44:42 -0000 Received: from dsl017-045-168.spk4.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO hydrogen.funkthat.com) ([69.17.45.168]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Dec 2003 19:44:42 -0000 Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (klyvwf@localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1])hBCJiggP065304; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:44:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBCJiffV065303; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:44:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:44:41 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: James Van Artsdalen Message-ID: <20031212194441.GD54398@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: James Van Artsdalen , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <200312120823.hBC8N6Ai074269@bigtex.jrv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312120823.hBC8N6Ai074269@bigtex.jrv.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bge usage of bus_dma_tag_create? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:44:45 -0000 James Van Artsdalen wrote this message on Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:23 -0600: > I am confused by this code in sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c. > Are the values for the lowaddr and highaddr args to > bus_dma_tag_create () swapped? > > The ata and aha drivers seem to have lowaddr <= highaddr, > but on AMD64 that's not true below. > > static int > bge_dma_alloc(dev) > device_t dev; > { > struct bge_softc *sc; > int nseg, i, error; > struct bge_dmamap_arg ctx; > > sc = device_get_softc(dev); > > /* > * Allocate the parent bus DMA tag appropriate for PCI. > */ > #define BGE_NSEG_NEW 32 > error = bus_dma_tag_create(NULL, /* parent */ > PAGE_SIZE, 0, /* alignment, boundary */ > BUS_SPACE_MAXADDR, /* lowaddr */ > BUS_SPACE_MAXADDR_32BIT,/* highaddr */ This really needs to be decided by the card, and if the card supports 64bit addressing or not.. but yes, this does look like they need to be reversed. If the card can support 64bit addressing, then they should both be changed to BUS_SPACE_MAXADDR, but if the card only supports 32bit addressing then they should be swapped.. >From the bus_dma man page: lowaddr highaddr Bounds of the window of bus address space that cannot be directly accessed by the device. The window contains all address greater than lowaddr and less than or equal to highaddr. For example, a device incapable of DMA above 4GB, would specify a highaddr of BUS_SPACE_MAXADDR and a lowaddr of BUS_SPACE_MAXADDR_32BIT. Similarly a device that Though why this would work on x86 isn't good, maybe we need to add an assert in the bus_dma routines that lowaddr <= highaddr? -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 13:22:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBCB16A4CE; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:22:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B6543D37; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:22:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) hBCLMeLO025605; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:22:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBCLMd8A028529; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:22:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:22:39 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200312122122.hBCLMd8A028529@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org: des set sender to Tinderbox using -f Sender: Tinderbox From: Tinderbox To: current@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: [releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:22:43 -0000 TB --- 2003-12-12 19:43:07 - tinderbox 2.2 running on 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org TB --- 2003-12-12 19:43:07 - starting RELENG_5_1 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2003-12-12 19:43:07 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_5_1 src TB --- 2003-12-12 19:53:56 - building world TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4: populating /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/include >>> stage 4: building libraries >>> stage 4: make dependencies >>> stage 4: building everything.. TB --- 2003-12-12 21:22:31 - building generic kernel TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src TB --- /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Fri Dec 12 21:22:32 GMT 2003 [...] awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/kern/linker_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/mii/miibus_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/pccard/card_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/pccard/power_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/pci/pci_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/pci/pcib_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/isa/isa_if.m -c make: don't know how to make /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/ia32/ia32_sigtramp.S. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2003-12-12 21:22:39 - TB --- /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-12-12 21:22:39 - TB --- ERROR: failed to build generic kernel TB --- 2003-12-12 21:22:39 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 23:16:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3BE16A4CE; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:16:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FEE43D35; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:16:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) hBD7G4LO051794; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:16:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBD7G4dw051793; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:16:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:16:04 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200312130716.hBD7G4dw051793@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> X-Authentication-Warning: triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org: des set sender to Tinderbox using -f Sender: Tinderbox From: Tinderbox To: current@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: [releng_5_1 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 07:16:22 -0000 TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64 TB --- mkdir /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2003-12-13 06:24:46 - tinderbox 2.2 running on triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org TB --- 2003-12-13 06:24:46 - starting RELENG_5_1 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2003-12-13 06:24:46 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs checkout -P -rRELENG_5_1 src TB --- 2003-12-13 06:35:17 - building world TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld Running test variables PASS: Test variables detected no regression, output matches. Running test targets PASS: Test targets detected no regression. Running test sysvmatch PASS: Test sysvmatch detected no regression. Running test lhs_expn FAIL: Test failed: regression detected. See above. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/tools/regression/usr.bin/make. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/tools/regression/usr.bin/make. -------------------------------------------------------------- Building an up-to-date make(1) -------------------------------------------------------------- /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/obj/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/make.i386/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make created for /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/buf.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/compat.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/for.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/hash.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/job.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/main.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/make.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bi! n/make/parse.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/str.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/util.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/var.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/var_modify.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstAppend.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstAtEnd.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstAtFront.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstClose.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstConcat.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/u! sr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstDatum.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/R! ELENG_5_ 1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstDeQueue.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstDestroy.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstDupl.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstEnQueue.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstFind.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstFindFrom.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstFirst.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstForEach.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstForEachFrom.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstInit.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstInsert.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELE! NG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstIsAtEnd.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstIsEmpty.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstLast.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstMember.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstNext.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstOpen.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstRemove.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstReplace.c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstSucc.c echo make: /usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/buf.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/compat.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/for.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/hash.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/job.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/main.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/make.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/str.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/util.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/var.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/var_modify.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstAppend.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstAtEnd.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstAtFront.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstClose.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstConcat.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstDatum.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstDeQueue.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstDestroy.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstDupl.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstEnQueue.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstFind.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstFindFrom.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstFirst.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstForEach.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstForEachFrom.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstInit.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstInsert.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstIsAtEnd.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstIsEmpty.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstLast.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstMember.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstNext.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstOpen.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstRemove.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstReplace.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -c /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib/lstSucc.c cc -O -pipe -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -static -o make arch.o buf.o compat.o cond.o dir.o for.o hash.o job.o main.o make.o parse.o str.o suff.o targ.o util.o var.o var_modify.o lstAppend.o lstAtEnd.o lstAtFront.o lstClose.o lstConcat.o lstDatum.o lstDeQueue.o lstDestroy.o lstDupl.o lstEnQueue.o lstFind.o lstFindFrom.o lstFirst.o lstForEach.o lstForEachFrom.o lstInit.o lstInsert.o lstIsAtEnd.o lstIsEmpty.o lstLast.o lstMember.o lstNext.o lstOpen.o lstRemove.o lstReplace.o lstSucc.o sh /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 make /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/obj/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/make.i386 -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4: populating /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/include >>> stage 4: building libraries >>> stage 4: make dependencies >>> stage 4: building everything.. TB --- 2003-12-13 07:16:01 - building generic kernel TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src TB --- /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC Running test variables PASS: Test variables detected no regression, output matches. Running test targets PASS: Test targets detected no regression. Running test sysvmatch PASS: Test sysvmatch detected no regression. Running test lhs_expn FAIL: Test failed: regression detected. See above. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/tools/regression/usr.bin/make. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/tools/regression/usr.bin/make. -------------------------------------------------------------- Building an up-to-date make(1) -------------------------------------------------------------- sh /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 make /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/obj/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/make.i386 -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Dec 13 07:16:01 GMT 2003 [...] awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/kern/linker_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/mii/miibus_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/pccard/card_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/pccard/power_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/pci/pci_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/pci/pcib_if.m -c awk -f /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/isa/isa_if.m -c make: don't know how to make /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/ia32/ia32_sigtramp.S. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_5_1/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2003-12-13 07:16:04 - TB --- /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-12-13 07:16:04 - TB --- ERROR: failed to build generic kernel TB --- 2003-12-13 07:16:04 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 23:59:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108EA16A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:59:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from qeylIS.klingons.de (qeylIS.klingons.de [195.143.213.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4549543D31 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:58:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gebhart@qeylIS.klingons.de) Received: from qeylIS.klingons.de (snake@localhost [127.0.0.1]) hBD7wuCk099994 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:58:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gebhart@qeylIS.klingons.de) Received: (from gebhart@localhost) by qeylIS.klingons.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hBD7wt8n099993 for freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:58:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gebhart) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:58:55 +0100 From: Ralf Gebhart To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20031213075855.GM64240@snake.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.38 Subject: vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 07:59:00 -0000 Has anyone tried to make vinum run yet on amd64 FreeBSD? I get compile errors when I try to build a kernel with it: cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=20000 -fno-strict-aliasing -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinum.c /usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinum.c: In function `vinumattach': /usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinum.c:136: error: structure has no member named `p_intr_nesting_level' /usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinum.c:143: error: structure has no member named `p_intr_nesting_level' /usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinum.c:150: error: structure has no member named `p_intr_nesting_level' /usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinum.c:162: error: structure has no member named `p_intr_nesting_level' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TS. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Am I doing something wrong or is vinum simply not available yet in FreeBSD/amd64 ? -- Ralf 'Snake' Gebhart