Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:27:37 +0200
From:      Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at>
To:        Adam Migus <adam@migus.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: sys/conf/DEFAULT[S]
Message-ID:  <20030928102735.GI802@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>
In-Reply-To: <3F75DBD1.70600@migus.org>
References:  <XFMail.20030924170342.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030925092319.H5418@gamplex.bde.org> <49939.204.254.155.35.1064593320.squirrel@mail.migus.org> <20030927080420.N18558@gamplex.bde.org> <20030927105241.GG802@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> <3F75DBD1.70600@migus.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:49:53PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:

> Actually, while the error is not simply an "off-by-one" error, this 
> patch is not sufficient to fix the nested case:
> 
> Below is the output of running config (with or without this patch) on my 
> set of kernels, one of which includes twice on the first line.  This 
> language specification, in fact, fails to handle an include, immediately 
> followed by anything other than a blank line or comment.  Thus the fix 
> is a little more complicated.

<snip>

I can't reproduce this here.  I have no problem with
'include FOO; include BAR' on a single line.  Can you make your config
files available?

Stefan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030928102735.GI802>