From owner-freebsd-bugbusters Wed Feb 19 8:58:35 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2ABC37B401 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:58:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from atnsmtp91.24on.cc (ATNSMTP91.24on.cc [213.225.2.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591DF43F85 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:58:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tilman@arved.de) Received: from 21322530218.direct.eti.at ([213.225.30.218]) by atnsmtp91.24on.cc with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.447.44); Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:02:15 +0100 Received: from sauna.arved.de (sauna.arved.de [192.168.2.4]) by 21322530218.direct.eti.at (8.12.7/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1JGxjQb050625 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:59:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tilman@arved.de) Received: from sauna.arved.de (sauna.arved.de [127.0.0.1]) by sauna.arved.de (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1JGwM5w041166 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:58:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tilman@arved.de) Received: (from tilman@localhost) by sauna.arved.de (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h1JGwMr7041165; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:58:22 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: sauna.arved.de: tilman set sender to tilman@arved.de using -f Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:58:09 +0100 From: Tilman Linneweh To: bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: PRs assigned to people without freefall account. Message-Id: <20030219175809.60befbe1.arved@FreeBSD.org> Organization: FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.5AmETU.SgFSuGe" Sender: owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=.5AmETU.SgFSuGe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi bugbusters, I am wondering if there is a policy about assigning PRs to people without freefall accounts. There are some in the PR Database most sent by MA, Dunzi, who prefills the Responsible: field with the port Maintainer. For example: ports/48392 ports/48387 ports/48330 But I have also seen some committers assign PRs to the port Maintainers, e.g ports/48363. IMHO all PRs should be assigned to people who are able to close the PRs. What do you think? Should an explaining paragraph be added to the PR handling guidelines? regards tilman --=.5AmETU.SgFSuGe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+U7etfCLDn4B6xToRAhPEAJ91/LMOAT/Ai/F9eJLfMaQcHNrl7ACeJg1F 9Uv2pfi2lisUEIC8PK7De3o= =wgLF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.5AmETU.SgFSuGe-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugbusters" in the body of the message