From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 13:20:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B75037B404 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEA843F85 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:20:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5FKKChR070557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:20:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost)h5FKKBHm070556 for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:20:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (localhost.klemm.apsfilter.org [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.apsfilter.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5FKGTlR002495 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:16:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5FKGSKf002494 for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:16:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:16:28 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030615201628.GA2120@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-RC X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Which 160-180 GB ATA disk is reliable and fast ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:20:17 -0000 My current Seagate Disk has severe unrecoverable read errors. ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 Jun 14 22:11:22 titan kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Jun 14 22:11:23 titan kernel: ad0: ATAPI 00 00 Jun 14 22:11:23 titan kernel: ad0: ATA 01 a5 Jun 14 22:11:23 titan kernel: ad0: success setting UDMA33 on VIA 82C686A chip Jun 14 22:11:25 titan kernel: ad0: hard error cmd=read fsbn 115471868 of 115471868-115471871 status=51 error=40 Jun 15 03:01:57 titan kernel: ad0: hard error cmd=read fsbn 115471868 of 115471868-115471871 status=51 error=40 Jun 15 20:40:46 titan kernel: ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 Jun 15 20:40:46 titan kernel: ad0: hard error cmd=read fsbn 115471868 of 115471868-115471871 status=51 error=40 Before using this Seagate Drive I had severe problems with 40GB IBM and Maxtor drives. They all worked for about 1/2-1 year and then failed quickly :-/ I have to look for another drive now, but which one ? Do you have perhaps some background informations concerning the one or other drive ? IBM IC35L180AVV207 185,2 GB 8,5/8192/7200 U-100 IDE 184.00 EUR Deskstar 180 GXP Maxtor 6Y160P0 160,0 GB 9,4/8192/7200 U-133 IDE 164.00 EUR DiamondMax Plus 9 Seagate ST3160023A 160,0 GB 8,5/8192/7200 U-100 IDE 189.00 EUR Barracuda 7200.7 W.Digit WD1600JB 160,0 GB 8,9/8192/7200 U-100 IDE 189.00 EUR Caviar Special Edition In this link you'll see that the Seagate disk has a bad write performance compared to other drives like the IBM 180 GXP. http://www.ixbt-labs.com/articles2/seagate-barr7/ I'll connect the drive to my on-board ATA interface which is only capable of UDMA-66. The drive should be in the 1st place reliable (don't want to replace my drives on a 6-12 month cycle anymore) and performance is also a matter. What's your recommendation ?? Thanks Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 22:03:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6949937B401 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zixvpm01.seton.org (zixvpm01.seton.org [207.193.126.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4C643F85 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:03:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mgrooms@seton.org) Received: from zixvpm01.seton.org (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1]) by Outbound.seton.org (Proprietary) with ESMTP id D13BB36004E for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:03:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.seton.org (mail-relay.aus.dcnhs.org [10.21.254.249]) by zixvpm01.seton.org (Proprietary) with ESMTP id A293E330064; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:03:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from aus-gwia.aus.dcnhs.org (aus-gwia.aus.dcnhs.org [10.20.10.211]) by mail.seton.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCB3D0006; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:03:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from AUS_SETON-MTA by aus-gwia.aus.dcnhs.org with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:03:46 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.1 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:03:42 -0500 From: "Matthew Grooms" To: , Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: burncd and PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-105 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 05:03:49 -0000 Hello all, I was hoping I could get some help ... I just purchased a spanky new dvd/cdrw, threw it in my freebsd box ( 4.7-release ) and proceeded to burncd myself a freebsd 5.1 iso when I got this message ... -bash-2.05b$ burncd -f /dev/acd0c data 5.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso fixate next writeable LBA 0 writing from file 5.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso size 630048 KB written this track 832 KB (0%) total 832 KB only wrote -1 of 32768 bytes err=16 fixating CD, please wait.. /var/log/messages contain these entries that look telling ... Jun 16 04:07:14 hole /kernel: acd0: REPORT_KEY - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x6f ascq=0x04 error=0x00 Jun 16 04:08:06 hole /kernel: acd0: REPORT_KEY - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x6f ascq=0x04 error=0x00 Jun 16 04:11:10 hole /kernel: acd0: REPORT_KEY - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x6f ascq=0x04 error=0x00 Any suggestions? What info can I provide to help fix this problem? Any help is appreciated. -Matthew From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 22:29:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E1B37B405 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.1u.ca (mail.1u.ca [216.138.197.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAD543FD7 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:29:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lnb@FreeBSDsystems.COM) Received: (qmail 73034 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jun 2003 05:29:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.freebsdsystems.com) (lnb@freebsdsystems.com@192.168.0.27) by 192.168.0.27 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 05:29:00 -0000 Received: from 192.168.0.69 (SquirrelMail authenticated user lnb@freebsdsystems.com) by mail.freebsdsystems.com with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 01:29:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49486.192.168.0.69.1055741340.squirrel@mail.freebsdsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20030615201628.GA2120@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20030615201628.GA2120@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 01:29:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "Lanny Baron" To: "Andreas Klemm" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which 160-180 GB ATA disk is reliable and fast ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 05:29:17 -0000 Hi Andreas, Gee, I was just in Germany but forgot to look you up! IBM does not make drives any more. They are all now Hitachi. Hitachi Deskstar and Ultrastar. I have had 0 problems with the new Hitachi Drives in our Servers. We have lost only 2 drives (both SCSI) from Seagate. Maxtor I would not touch with a 10 foot poll. WD has a problem with the connector on our Servers. So we dont use them. My suggestion is to use SATA. And then use Seagate Barracuda 7. Hope this helps. Regards, Lanny Andreas Klemm said: > My current Seagate Disk has severe unrecoverable read errors. > ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 > > Jun 14 22:11:22 titan kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - > resetting > Jun 14 22:11:23 titan kernel: ad0: ATAPI 00 00 > Jun 14 22:11:23 titan kernel: ad0: ATA 01 a5 > Jun 14 22:11:23 titan kernel: ad0: success setting UDMA33 on VIA 82C686A > chip > Jun 14 22:11:25 titan kernel: ad0: hard error cmd=read fsbn 115471868 of > 115471868-115471871 status=51 error=40 > Jun 15 03:01:57 titan kernel: ad0: hard error cmd=read fsbn 115471868 of > 115471868-115471871 status=51 error=40 > Jun 15 20:40:46 titan kernel: ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at > ata0-master UDMA66 > Jun 15 20:40:46 titan kernel: ad0: hard error cmd=read fsbn 115471868 of > 115471868-115471871 status=51 error=40 > > Before using this Seagate Drive I had severe problems with > 40GB IBM and Maxtor drives. > They all worked for about 1/2-1 year and then failed quickly :-/ > > I have to look for another drive now, but which one ? > Do you have perhaps some background informations concerning > the one or other drive ? > > IBM IC35L180AVV207 185,2 GB 8,5/8192/7200 U-100 IDE 184.00 EUR > Deskstar 180 GXP > Maxtor 6Y160P0 160,0 GB 9,4/8192/7200 U-133 IDE 164.00 EUR > DiamondMax Plus 9 > Seagate ST3160023A 160,0 GB 8,5/8192/7200 U-100 IDE 189.00 EUR > Barracuda 7200.7 > W.Digit WD1600JB 160,0 GB 8,9/8192/7200 U-100 IDE 189.00 EUR > Caviar Special Edition > > In this link you'll see that the Seagate disk has a bad write > performance compared to other drives like the IBM 180 GXP. > http://www.ixbt-labs.com/articles2/seagate-barr7/ > > I'll connect the drive to my on-board ATA interface which is > only capable of UDMA-66. > > The drive should be in the 1st place reliable (don't want to replace > my drives on a 6-12 month cycle anymore) and performance is also a matter. > > What's your recommendation ?? > > Thanks > > Andreas /// > > -- > Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE > Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > +~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~ Lanny Baron Proud to be 100% FreeBSD FreeBSD Systems, Inc / Freedom Technologies Corp. http://www.FreeBSDsystems.COM 1.877.963.1900 +~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~+~ From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 22:55:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9BA37B40B for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9E943FDF for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:55:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5G5tBhR080409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:55:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost)h5G5tAjg080408; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:55:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (localhost.klemm.apsfilter.org [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.apsfilter.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5G5qRJK002647; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:52:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5G5qLpN002644; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:52:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:52:21 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Lanny Baron Message-ID: <20030616055221.GA2580@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20030615201628.GA2120@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <49486.192.168.0.69.1055741340.squirrel@mail.freebsdsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49486.192.168.0.69.1055741340.squirrel@mail.freebsdsystems.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-RC X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: which SATA controller (was Re: Which 160-180 GB ATA disk is reliable and fast ?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, bits_@web.de List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 05:55:18 -0000 On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 01:29:00AM -0400, Lanny Baron wrote: > Hi Andreas, > Gee, I was just in Germany but forgot to look you up! Well next time ;-) > IBM does not make drives any more. They are all now Hitachi. Hitachi > Deskstar and Ultrastar. > I have had 0 problems with the new Hitachi Drives in our Servers. We have > lost only 2 drives (both SCSI) from Seagate. Nice to hear. I want the IBM drives because of tagged queuing, see ata manpage. > Maxtor I would not touch with a 10 foot poll. WD has a problem with the > connector on our Servers. So we dont use them. o.k. > My suggestion is to use SATA. And then use Seagate Barracuda 7. Doesn't have IBM/Hitachi a suitable SATA drive because I want to use tagged command queueing ? If I would use SATA, which controller works best ? I heard there are only some speaking SATA natively and others need additional bridges to translate again into the parallel bus system. I heard Promise are the best, is that true for SATA as well ? Which model would be the one that allows connection of 2-4 drives ? Should run under FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE and 5.1. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 23:28:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6778437B401; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h24-68-151-112.ed.shawcable.net (h24-66-229-2.ed.shawcable.net [24.66.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D189B43F85; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:28:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org.ua) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])h5G6Qi7F002399; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:26:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org.ua) From: To: andreas@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:26:44 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030615201628.GA2120@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> In-Reply-To: <20030615201628.GA2120@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306160026.44056.soralx@cydem.org.ua> cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which 160-180 GB ATA disk is reliable and fast ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:28:09 -0000 > My current Seagate Disk has severe unrecoverable read errors. > ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 This is exactly the same model as I have. What firmware revision does your drive have? How long did it work? There's some information that Seagate, Hitachi, and Maxtor call back some of their drives, as the drives that were made in China have faulty controller chip, AFAIK. My drive seems to be made in Singapore, and works excellent for almost a year. I even ran complete `dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/dev/null bs=32768` test few times. :) The new version of this model has lower seek time, and is also availble in serial ATA (as well as in parallel ATA) version. If you will use it in your desktop, note that it is also very quiet. I never had any problem with Seagate. I even have their ST-4038 drive in working condition 8) > Before using this Seagate Drive I had severe problems with > 40GB IBM and Maxtor drives. > They all worked for about 1/2-1 year and then failed quickly :-/ Some of IBM's HD also have (had, actually) problems (the famous DTLA line). It is like playing a roulette when bying IBM hard drive - there are very many people who reported that their drives die in about 2-6 months, and few who reported that their drives work for over a year flawlessly, and are very fast. With Maxtor HD I had problems myself - it started to have bad sectors on the place of Apache access log :), and then started to function intermittently > I'll connect the drive to my on-board ATA interface which is > only capable of UDMA-66. This is not good. If you connect UDMA100 HD to UDMA66 interface, the performance of the drive decreases signifacantly and non-proportionally (I'm not sure exactly why it is so now) > The drive should be in the 1st place reliable (don't want to replace > my drives on a 6-12 month cycle anymore) If you want a hard drive that will work under heavy load and is reliable, consider SCSI hard drives. I know about 5 ATA HDs that failed in 3-week period, and I never seen bad real SCSI drive (I still have an old 200M SCSI HD working). > and performance is also a matter. depend on your application - most of the modern HDs have minor performance differences 16.06.2003; 00:12:49 [SorAlx] http://cydem.org.ua/ From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 23:33:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2576637B401; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-out.comcast.net (smtp-out.comcast.net [24.153.64.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832AD43F75; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:33:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garycor@comcast.net) Received: from comcast.net (pcp04279996pcs.union01.nj.comcast.net [68.39.103.49]) by mtaout02.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HGK00CV4A6N6L@mtaout02.icomcast.net>; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 02:32:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 02:33:44 -0400 From: Gary Corcoran To: Lanny Baron Message-id: <3EED64C8.987C8FF0@comcast.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en References: <20030615201628.GA2120@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <49486.192.168.0.69.1055741340.squirrel@mail.freebsdsystems.com> cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which 160-180 GB ATA disk is reliable and fast ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:33:15 -0000 Lanny Baron wrote: > Maxtor I would not touch with a 10 foot poll. Why is that? I would have recommended the new Maxtor fluid-dynamic-bearing (FDB) ATA drives (200GB with 8MB cache), as I have them (at home). Should I be worried? :-O :) Gary From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 00:06:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B0E37B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5BF43F93 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:06:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5G765hR081390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:06:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost)h5G765hC081389; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:06:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (localhost.klemm.apsfilter.org [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.apsfilter.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5G75mJK003809; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:05:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5G75gur003808; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:05:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:05:41 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: soralx@cydem.org.ua Message-ID: <20030616070541.GG2974@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20030615201628.GA2120@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <200306160026.44056.soralx@cydem.org.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306160026.44056.soralx@cydem.org.ua> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-RC X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which 160-180 GB ATA disk is reliable and fast ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:06:58 -0000 On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:26:44AM -0600, soralx@cydem.org.ua wrote: > > > My current Seagate Disk has severe unrecoverable read errors. > > ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 > > This is exactly the same model as I have. What firmware revision does > your drive have? How long did it work? About half a year but would have to look it up. > There's some information that Seagate, Hitachi, and Maxtor call back some > of their drives, as the drives that were made in China have faulty controller > chip, AFAIK. oh ;-) then lets go IBM ??? ;-) > Some of IBM's HD also have (had, actually) problems (the famous DTLA > line). It is like playing a roulette when bying IBM hard drive - there > are very many people who reported that their drives die in about 2-6 > months, and few who reported that their drives work for over a year > flawlessly, and are very fast. Hehe or not .. oh dear ;-) > With Maxtor HD I had problems myself - it started to have bad sectors > on the place of Apache access log :), and then started to function > intermittently Well since I can't get real room for a new ATA controller I think I'll go with IBMs .... The dada density should be lower on their 180 GB drives, they have 6 heads instead of 4 on Seagate.... > > I'll connect the drive to my on-board ATA interface which is > > only capable of UDMA-66. > > This is not good. If you connect UDMA100 HD to UDMA66 interface, the > performance of the drive decreases signifacantly and non-proportionally > (I'm not sure exactly why it is so now) Well the Seagate UDMA100 on a UDMA 66 BUS was much quicker as the UDMA 66 disk that came with the machine.... They both were primary ..... So I can't second that .... Maybe its even faster when using a real UDMA 100 controller, but I couldn't notice such a degradation as you mention. Maybe only with certain drives ??? > If you want a hard drive that will work under heavy load and is reliable, > consider SCSI hard drives. I know about 5 ATA HDs that failed in 3-week > period, and I never seen bad real SCSI drive (I still have an old 200M > SCSI HD working). Is too loud and too expensive, not an option > > and performance is also a matter. > depend on your application - most of the modern HDs have minor > performance differences I do homerecording under XP and "make worlds" ;-) Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 07:07:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70FD37B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:07:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avenger.chaosarmy.org (avenger.chaosarmy.org [217.17.33.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBCAE43F85 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:07:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from m@avenger.chaosarmy.org) Received: (qmail 5748 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Jun 2003 16:08:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:08:05 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3?= Nasiadka To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030616160805.GA5733@avenger.chaosarmy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Sagem Fast 800 USB X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:07:53 -0000 Does FreeBSD support it? Is it going to support it in next weeks/months? Or maybe there's a way to emulate ethernet on this usb modem, then I could use PPPoE or PPPoA. Got this modem from my ISP and it works only with Windows & Linux atm ... :/ -- Michal Nasiadka majkel@majkel.com From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 08:06:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CE937B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mallaury.noc.nerim.net (smtp-101-monday.noc.nerim.net [62.4.17.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1731643FBD for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from raphael.dinge-lists@ohmforce.com) Received: from ohmforce.com (ohmforce.net1.nerim.net [62.212.106.14]) by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B6562FB7 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:06:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3EEDDCE7.1060302@ohmforce.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:06:15 +0200 From: Raphael Dinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Support for Nvidia NIC ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:06:21 -0000 Hi, NVidia ethernet controller seems not to be supported in FreeBSD, at least in version 4.8, 5.0, 5.1. This controller can be found on Asus A7N8X (*not the deluxe version*) and the SN41G2 from shuttle barebones. Is it planned to be supported ? if yes, when is it scheduled ? Since I own a SN41G2, I can test it. If it is not planned, then how long would it takes to code it ? (only needs to support pci as far as I know) What would be a good starting point if I wish to code it myself ? (let's suppose...) There is some Linux drivers code on Nvidia.com (and some .o object in elf, grr...), could it be of some use ? Should the code be made by Nvidia itself ? Thanks for any kind of informations, -- ========================================+======================== Raphael Dinge | Ohm Force DSP developer & Software designer | Digital Audio Software mailto:raphael.dinge-lists@ohmforce.com | http://www.ohmforce.com ========================================+======================== From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 10:23:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7953137B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug.clues.com [194.159.1.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A86343FDD for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:23:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5GHNaRO078163 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:23:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h5GHNa4f078162 for hardware@freebsd.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:23:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:23:35 +0100 From: Geoff Buckingham To: hardware@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030616172335.GA78129@chuggalug.clues.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: DL 360G3: BTX Halted X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:23:38 -0000 I have seen a number of posts in the archives dealing with btx halted errors, but few fixes. In the case of the HP/Compaq DL360G3s I had today I found disabling the 'virtual boot disk' from the advanced setting section of the BIOS fixed this. Does anybody know why this would cause problems as it is potentialy usefull functionality? From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 20:32:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CCC37B401; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out003.verizon.net (out003pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92D543F75; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from res03db2@gte.net) Received: from europa ([4.5.3.16]) by out003.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030617033234.JNEH4805.out003.verizon.net@europa>; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:32:34 -0500 Message-ID: <009b01c33481$8b7d5c20$6f64a8c0@europa> From: "Robert Clark" To: , "Andreas Klemm" References: <20030615201628.GA2120@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:35:48 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out003.verizon.net from [4.5.3.16] at Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:32:33 -0500 cc: Portland FreeBSD User Group Subject: Re: Which 160-180 GB ATA disk is reliable and fast ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 03:32:36 -0000 The Western Digital WD1600JB160GB ATA100 bundle including a Promise Ultra100 TX2 controller and 3yr warranty is 149$ at Costco. Doesn't look like they're available on the website though. [RC] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Klemm" To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 1:16 PM Subject: Which 160-180 GB ATA disk is reliable and fast ? > My current Seagate Disk has severe unrecoverable read errors. > ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 > > Jun 14 22:11:22 titan kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > Jun 14 22:11:23 titan kernel: ad0: ATAPI 00 00 > Jun 14 22:11:23 titan kernel: ad0: ATA 01 a5 > Jun 14 22:11:23 titan kernel: ad0: success setting UDMA33 on VIA 82C686A chip > Jun 14 22:11:25 titan kernel: ad0: hard error cmd=read fsbn 115471868 of 115471868-115471871 status=51 error=40 > Jun 15 03:01:57 titan kernel: ad0: hard error cmd=read fsbn 115471868 of 115471868-115471871 status=51 error=40 > Jun 15 20:40:46 titan kernel: ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 > Jun 15 20:40:46 titan kernel: ad0: hard error cmd=read fsbn 115471868 of 115471868-115471871 status=51 error=40 > > Before using this Seagate Drive I had severe problems with > 40GB IBM and Maxtor drives. > They all worked for about 1/2-1 year and then failed quickly :-/ > > I have to look for another drive now, but which one ? > Do you have perhaps some background informations concerning > the one or other drive ? > > IBM IC35L180AVV207 185,2 GB 8,5/8192/7200 U-100 IDE 184.00 EUR > Deskstar 180 GXP > Maxtor 6Y160P0 160,0 GB 9,4/8192/7200 U-133 IDE 164.00 EUR > DiamondMax Plus 9 > Seagate ST3160023A 160,0 GB 8,5/8192/7200 U-100 IDE 189.00 EUR > Barracuda 7200.7 > W.Digit WD1600JB 160,0 GB 8,9/8192/7200 U-100 IDE 189.00 EUR > Caviar Special Edition > > In this link you'll see that the Seagate disk has a bad write > performance compared to other drives like the IBM 180 GXP. > http://www.ixbt-labs.com/articles2/seagate-barr7/ > > I'll connect the drive to my on-board ATA interface which is > only capable of UDMA-66. > > The drive should be in the 1st place reliable (don't want to replace > my drives on a 6-12 month cycle anymore) and performance is also a matter. > > What's your recommendation ?? > > Thanks > > Andreas /// > > -- > Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE > Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 21:52:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCDE37B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7EF43FAF for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:52:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ps@mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A74932ED3F1; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:52:50 -0700 From: Paul Saab To: Geoff Buckingham Message-ID: <20030617045250.GA66174@elvis.mu.org> References: <20030616172335.GA78129@chuggalug.clues.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030616172335.GA78129@chuggalug.clues.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DL 360G3: BTX Halted X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 04:52:51 -0000 Upgrade your rom and this problem will go away. Virtual Boot Disk is a feature which allows you to use the floppy on your laptop (an example) and have it appear on the server as a floppy disk. You need to use the iLo management port to use this though. Geoff Buckingham (geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) wrote: > > I have seen a number of posts in the archives dealing with btx halted errors, > but few fixes. In the case of the HP/Compaq DL360G3s I had today I found > disabling the 'virtual boot disk' from the advanced setting section of the > BIOS fixed this. > > Does anybody know why this would cause problems as it is potentialy usefull > functionality? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -ps From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 00:03:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E6437B401 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smilodon.ecst.csuchico.edu (smilodon.ecst.csuchico.edu [132.241.1.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AAAD43F75 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:03:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davey@ecst.csuchico.edu) Received: (qmail 20334 invoked by uid 23500); 16 Jun 2003 23:03:44 -0700 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:03:43 -0700 (PDT) From: David Yucht To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Abysmal RAID1 write performance; ATA driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:03:48 -0000 Finally getting around to asking for assistance with a bizarre problem with mirrored raid performance on 4.6-4.8 RELEASE. I've been using this particular system for about 18 months as a primary fileserver for my home lan and have had a nagging problem with it for about a year. Basically, one of the mirrored arrays on the box has a sustained write speed of about 1.2-1.8MB/s, making the box pretty much impossible to work with directly. The array works fine in Windows, just not Free. Right now there are 4 drives on two seperate RAID controllers (yes, the cruddy wannabe kind), one array being the OS and the other for data. ar0 is the data array, consisting of two 80GB IBM 120GXPs hung off an old Promise Fasttrak 100 flashed to the most recent bios. ar1 is the system array, composed of two 40GB IBM 60GXPs on an integrated HPT370. Read performance on the data array is perfectly fine. Doing a simple "dd if=/dev/ar0 of=/dev/null bs=1024k" results in a transfer rate of about 45MB/s. This is as expected, given a result of 38MB/s for the system array. However, once switching over to write data to the data array, things crap out. Doing a "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ar0 bs=1024k" takes days, literally, as the speed is about 1.2-1.8 MB/s. On the system array, things are normal, about 20-30MB/s for writes. Please note, though, that when the disks are accessed independently on the data array, write performance is 35MB/s, i.e. perfectly normal. Disk performance is also up around 60MB/s for RAID0 arrays, so everything leads me to believe this is not hardware. I've been working on this problem on and off for the past year as time permits. So far I've tried tuning just about every relevant kernel value, destroying and recreating the array, digging around for patches and/or hacks, and covered all bases with the actual hardware. Different kernel configs have not helped, GENERIC results in problems as do home rolled configs. I've searched far and wide accross forums, various newsgroups, and spent more time with google than family. Still no clue and nobody else with a similar problem. Yes, I am considering replacing the controller, but will be unable to do so for a few more months. That still doesn't satisfy my need for knowing why this is happening, though. ~Regards Here are the relevant dumps: dmesg ---------------------- FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Tue May 27 22:34:34 PDT 2003 root@invalid.domain.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LITE Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1100MHz (1115.37-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff< FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MC A,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE> real memory = 536805376 (524224K bytes) avail memory = 518930432 (506768K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0354000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 11 entries at 0xc00fd950 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xd0000000-0xd3ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: <3Dfx Voodoo 3 graphics accelerator> at 0.0 irq 5 pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 atapci0: port 0xa000-0xa03f,0x9c00-0x9c03,0x9800-0x9807,0x9400-0x9403,0x9000-0x9007 mem 0xdb000000-0xdb01ffff irq 15 at device 1.0 on pci2 ata2: at 0x9000 on atapci0 ata3: at 0x9800 on atapci0 fxp0: port 0xa400-0xa43f mem 0xdb020000-0xdb03ffff,0xdb040000-0xdb040fff irq 14 at device 3.0 on pci2 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:c9:4e:70 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto atapci1: port 0xb800-0xb8ff,0xb400-0xb403,0xb000-0xb007,0xac00-0xac03,0xa800-0xa807 irq 11 at device 6.0 on pci2 ata4: at 0xa800 on atapci1 ata5: at 0xb000 on atapci1 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 uhci0: port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 14 at device 31.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2443) at 31.3 irq 0 uhci1: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 7 at device 31.4 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2445) at 31.5 irq 15 orm0: