From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 08:23:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DE516A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:23:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [195.131.4.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A33743F85 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:23:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ip96-52.dialup.wplus.net (ip96-52.dialup.wplus.net [195.131.96.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by ftp.translate.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAUGLN1u086170; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:22:01 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:24:55 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) Personal Organization: Home X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1693621737.20031130192455@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Damian Gerow In-Reply-To: <20031129050830.GA723@afflictions.org> References: <20031129050830.GA723@afflictions.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: M-Audio Revolution 7.1 sound card X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lev Serebryakov List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:23:46 -0000 Hello, Damian! Saturday, November 29, 2003, 8:08:34 AM, you wrote: DG> However, the drivers provided by OSS (http://www.opensound.com/) are a DG> little less than great. The sound crackles and snaps, and every once in a DG> while, it just skips and skips and skips. Not fun. Not to mention their DG> license... ALSA supports this card, so I'm porting driver to BSD now but it goes very slow, I have not much time for it :( DG> I've sent a note to M-Audio asking about drivers and technical specs, but DG> have yet to hear a response. Has anyone else picked up this card, or is I have specs of Envy24HT chip ("heart" of Revolution 7.1) DG> FWIW, when the driver *does* work, there is a *huge* difference in sound DG> quality. And given that the board is considerably cheaper than an Audigy 2, DG> I'd say it's well worth the money, *if* FreeBSD can get a driver. It is strange. In Russia it costs about 1.5 times more than Aud2 ($100 for Audigy2, not platinum version and $160 for Rev 7.1), buty it have MUCH BETTER sound, than any Creative's crap. Also, I've used Audiophile 2496 from M-Audio, brilliant sound too, and much better recording, but no 7.1 support and costs about $200 here. -- Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 10:14:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900E116A4CF; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:14:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE9743FBD; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:14:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia [172.16.0.56]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7C85EA2E; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:31:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 436536D42D; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:13:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:13:54 -0500 From: Damian Gerow To: Lev Serebryakov Message-ID: <20031130181346.GA766@afflictions.org> References: <20031129050830.GA723@afflictions.org> <1693621737.20031130192455@serebryakov.spb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1693621737.20031130192455@serebryakov.spb.ru> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-BETA on a i386 X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: M-Audio Revolution 7.1 sound card X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:14:11 -0000 Thus spake Lev Serebryakov (lev@FreeBSD.org) [30/11/03 11:48]: > DG> However, the drivers provided by OSS (http://www.opensound.com/) are a > DG> little less than great. The sound crackles and snaps, and every once in a > DG> while, it just skips and skips and skips. Not fun. Not to mention their > DG> license... > ALSA supports this card, so I'm porting driver to BSD now but it goes > very slow, I have not much time for it :( Hey, a driver in the works is better than no driver at all! > I have specs of Envy24HT chip ("heart" of Revolution 7.1) Excellent! I still haven't heard from M-Audio, but I guess there's no real need to chase them down anymore. One more question, though: the Windows installation gives you the option to select which channels you want activated, what type of audio support you want, etc. I'm presuming some of that is done in-software, but will there be full mixer support? I've been incredibly non-plussed with OSSs driver in that regard -- none of the readily available Open Source mixers work, and the mixer they provide doesn't give you channel control. I can only use the front speaker/headphone channel. :( > It is strange. In Russia it costs about 1.5 times more than Aud2 > ($100 for Audigy2, not platinum version and $160 for Rev 7.1), buty it > have MUCH BETTER sound, than any Creative's crap. Technically speaking, I /can/ get the Audigy2 for $99 (Canadian), and the Revolution cost $140. But that Audigy2 is OEM -- so you get the soundcard in a plastic anti-static bag. If you get the boxed version, you're looking at about $160-$260, depending on which version you get. With the Revolution's $140, you get a whack of software as well. But agreed, the sound quality is a heck of a lot better. From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 00:37:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32AF16A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 00:37:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from web21102.mail.yahoo.com (web21102.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42B8E43FA3 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 00:37:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20031202083724.47432.qmail@web21102.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.228.74.10] by web21102.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:37:24 PST Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 00:37:24 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Terribile To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Broadcom 4401 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:37:26 -0000 Greetings, all. Does anyone have a driver for the Broadcom 4401 NIC on FreeBSD 4.9? My employer has just bought a bunch of Dell boxes with these, and more may be on the way. But FreeBSD 4.9 doesn't recognize the NIC, and it looks like Red Hat Linux doesn't see it, either. (We will be running each in proportion to the amount of trouble they don't cause us.) I discovered a PR with some patches to a non-existent driver (`bfe'), and a driver (`bcm') contributed by Duncan Barclay. But it appears only to compile under 5.x . When I tried it under 4.9, I got a number of messages that I can't transport off the machine because I have neither network nor writable media. They included field mtx has incomplete type implicit definition of mtx_init MTX_NETWORK_LOCK undeclared MTX_DEF undeclared MTX_RECURSE undeclared busdma_lock_mutex undeclared Giant undeclared too many arguments to function `bus_dma_create' Does anyone have a way to use this NIC under FreeBSD 4.x? Mark Terribile [This is not my normal stomping ground, so please cc me at materribile@yahoo.com. Thanks.] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 09:00:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA07416A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:00:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9435543FE3 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:00:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) hB2Gxrvq030208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:59:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB2GxqWK012014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:59:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB2Gxq2u092532; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:59:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB2GxpmN092531; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:59:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:59:50 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Barney Wolff Message-ID: <20031202165949.GP81181@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <200311050441.hA54fhJ54978@NOSPAM.spam.NOSPAM.spam.NOSPAM.dyndns.dk> <200311210043.hAL0hDu01322@NOSPAM.spam.NOSPAM.spam.NOSPAM.dyndns.dk> <20031121194845.GA87408@pit.databus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031121194845.GA87408@pit.databus.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.1-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: FreeBSD Hardware Wizards Subject: Re: USB camera compatibility question X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:00:03 -0000 On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:48:46PM -0500, Barney Wolff wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:43:13AM +0100, Barry Bouwsma wrote: > > > > Yes, because so far the images snarfed with my hacks are okay for the > > first 4096 bytes, thereafter failing to match the perfect images I can > > download with the `mtools' utilities from a printer cum card slot. > > There seem to be chunks of NULs present regularly throughout the file. > > The "junk at byte 4097" symptom matches what I get with a Sony F707 > on -current using the OHCI usb controller. I believe it's a bug in > the ohci driver but don't know more than that. You want ohci.c rev 1.139 -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 00:35:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D861216A4CF for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 00:35:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.covadmail.net (mx05.covadmail.net [63.65.120.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC57243FBD for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 00:35:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from strick@covad.net) Received: (covad.net 26030 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 08:35:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mist.nodomain) (67.101.150.88) by sun-qmail09 with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 08:35:37 -0000 Received: from mist.nodomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mist.nodomain (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB48ZX0v009506; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 00:35:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@mist.nodomain) Received: (from dan@localhost) by mist.nodomain (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hB48ZX0F009505; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 00:35:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 00:35:33 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Strick Message-Id: <200312040835.hB48ZX0F009505@mist.nodomain> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG cc: dan@mist.nodomain Subject: Incorrect identification of ultra dma ATA cables X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:35:46 -0000 I have a couple of ATA133 (UDMA6) disk drives connected to an Intel ICH5 IDE (parallel ATA) controller. My FreeBSD 4.9-release ATA driver limits them to ATA33 (UDMA2) without comment. (I.E. There are no warning messages.) The reason is that when the ata_dmainit() routine reads the PCI config space "IDE I/O Configuration Register" for the IDE controller (offset 0x54, known in the driver as "word54"), it gets nothing but zero bits. In the Intel ICH5 datasheet, bits 4-7 (one for each possible IDE device) are described as: xxx xxx Channel Cable Reporting - R/W. BIOS should program this bit to tell the IDE driver which cable is plugged into the channel. 0 = 40 conductor cable is present 1 = 80 conductor cable is present I tried three different 80 conductor UDMA cables. I examined them carefully. I even checked for correct wiring of the PDIAG/CBLID signal lines with an ohmmeter. My question is this: is the problem likely to be the BIOS failing to correctly set the bits or could something in FreeBSD somehow be incorrectly clearing the bits before the ata_dmainit() routine runs? (I grepped the driver sources for occurrences of 0x54 and found no culprit.) My motherboard is a Gigabyte 8KNXP and the BIOS is an AWARD BIOS, version F8. Dan Strick strick@covad.net From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 03:06:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A308716A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 03:06:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from boleskine.patpro.net (boleskine.patpro.net [62.4.20.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FE643FDF for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 03:06:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patpro@patpro.net) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (cassandre [192.168.0.1]) by boleskine.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D07CC7 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:06:55 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org From: Patrick Proniewski Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:06:51 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) Subject: realtek 8101L support X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 11:06:54 -0000 Hello, I'll have to install FreeBSD 4.9 or 5.1 on a machine sporting gigabyte GA-8LD533 motherboard. This board has an onboard ethernet port using the Realtek 8101L. This chip is not listed in 5.1R/hardware-i386.html nor in 4.9R/hardware-i386.html will this work on FreeBSD ? Comments about the motherboard are welcome. thanks, -- je cherche un poste d'admin-sys Mac/UNIX (ou une jeune et jolie femme riche) http://patpro.net/cv.php From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 03:29:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6A316A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 03:29:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC99443FA3 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 03:28:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ericdahan@meiway.com) Received: from VirusGate.MEIway.com (virus-gate.meiway.com [212.73.210.91]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 32A4FEF435; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:28:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ericdahan@meiway.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.meiway.com [127.0.0.1]) by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D0755D00A; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:34:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from ms1.meiway.com (ms1.meiway.com [212.73.210.73]) by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81B75D008; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:34:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from EDA_PORT.MEIway.com [193.252.44.38] by ms1.meiway.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id AE13BF700F2; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:44:19 +0100 Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031204121845.01ea5a48@ms1.meiway.com> X-Sender: ericdahan@meiway.com@ms1.meiway.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:28:44 +0100 To: Patrick Proniewski From: Eric DAHAN In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: realtek 8101L support X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 11:29:01 -0000 At 12:06 04/12/2003, you wrote: >Hello, Hi, >I'll have to install FreeBSD 4.9 or 5.1 on a machine sporting gigabyte=20 >GA-8LD533 motherboard. >This board has an onboard ethernet port using the Realtek 8101L. This chip= =20 >is not listed in 5.1R/hardware-i386.html nor in 4.9R/hardware-i386.html > >will this work on FreeBSD ? Yes this card (and ethernet port) work well under FBSD 4.8 R : rl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.253.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.253.255 inet6 fe80::20d:61ff:fe07:1dda%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:0d:61:07:1d:da media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active >Comments about the motherboard are welcome. Don't testing under 4.9 or 5.1, but normaly work :(( Bye. >thanks, >-- >je cherche un poste d'admin-sys Mac/UNIX >(ou une jeune et jolie femme riche) >http://patpro.net/cv.php > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Eric DAHAN MEI 25 Avenue des Bretagnes 93230 ROMAINVILLE Tel : 01.41.71.06.06 Fax : 01.41.71.06.04. Centre de formation agr=E9e N=B011752906075 http://www.MEIWay.com From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 03:41:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C1516A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 03:41:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from boleskine.patpro.net (boleskine.patpro.net [62.4.20.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05BF43F93 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 03:41:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patpro@patpro.net) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (cassandre [192.168.0.1]) by boleskine.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF72C7; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:41:12 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031204121845.01ea5a48@ms1.meiway.com> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031204121845.01ea5a48@ms1.meiway.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Patrick Proniewski Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:41:11 +0100 To: Eric DAHAN X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: realtek 8101L support X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 11:41:15 -0000 On 04 d=E9c. 2003, at 12:28, Eric DAHAN wrote: >> I'll have to install FreeBSD 4.9 or 5.1 on a machine sporting=20 >> gigabyte GA-8LD533 motherboard. >> will this work on FreeBSD ? > > Yes this card (and ethernet port) work well under FBSD 4.8 R : > Don't testing under 4.9 or 5.1, but normaly work :(( Thank you very much for the fast reply. As it's ok with 4.8 it should=20 be ok with 4.9 or 5.1. I've had so much trouble with various Realtek chipset that now I always=20= ask before I try ;) patpro --=20 je cherche un poste d'admin-sys Mac/UNIX (ou une jeune et jolie femme riche) http://patpro.net/cv.php From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 09:17:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0535316A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:17:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [217.160.230.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43BC43FAF for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:17:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dark@perfora.net) Received: from [217.160.230.51] (helo=smtp.perfora.net) by mout.perfora.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1ARx6L-0002LU-00 for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:17:17 -0500 Received: from [24.169.60.91] (helo=mxus.perfora.net) by smtp.perfora.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1ARx6L-00079c-00 for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:17:17 -0500 Received: by mxus.perfora.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EE2492014; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 18:11:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 18:11:41 -0500 From: Dev Tugnait To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031203231141.GA1715@daemon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ X-Info: http://unixdaemon.org X-Operating-System: Unix/5.1-RELEASE (i386) X-Uptime: 6:10PM up 18 mins, 9 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.09, 0.08 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: James Bond Stealth Camera X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:17:19 -0000 I bought this new camera im running freebsd 5.1 when i plug it in and reboot i get Dec 3 17:34:17 daemon kernel: umass0: DD DD, rev 1.10/0.00, addr 2 Dec 3 17:34:17 daemon kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 Dec 3 17:34:17 daemon kernel: da0:
Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device Dec 3 17:34:17 daemon kernel: da0: 1.000MB/s transfers Dec 3 17:34:17 daemon kernel: da0: 7MB (16000 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 7C) Dec 3 17:34:32 daemon kernel: umass0: BBB reset failed, TI umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT And it reboots witha fatal page fault. Any ideas what i could do im guessing its not supported but ti seems to find the right name n stuff. Im no usb or camera person any help would be appreciated...thnk you ---++--- ---------GnuPGPVer 1.2.3-------------------------------------------------- pub 1024D/B9046473 2003-11-21 Dev Tugnait (Freebsd) Key fingerprint = F690 6725 1930 6FBE C05A FE4D 6CB1 34C1 B904 6473 sub 1024g/F8F019DF 2003-11-21 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 18:08:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677A316A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:08:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947B543F85 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:08:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) Received: from v6-roam-plosher.isc.org.b.b.0.0.3.0.0.0.8.f.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb:20b:dbff:fe9e:86f0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D196CA85C; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 02:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) From: Peter Losher Organization: ISC To: Mark Terribile , freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:08:02 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <20031202083724.47432.qmail@web21102.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20031202083724.47432.qmail@web21102.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312041808.02318.Peter_Losher@isc.org> Subject: Re: Broadcom 4401 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 02:08:03 -0000 On Tuesday 02 December 2003 12:37 am, Mark Terribile wrote: > Greetings, all. > > Does anyone have a driver for the Broadcom 4401 NIC on FreeBSD 4.9? The bfe (used to be bcm) driver only works under -current, and will be in 5.2 when it's released next year. That's the main reason I am running -current on this laptop (Dell Insprion 5100) -=- bfe0: mem 0xe0204000-0xe0205fff irq 10 at device 1.0 on pci2 bfe0: Ethernet address: 00:0b:db:9e:86:f0 -=- I haven't heard anything about backporting it to -STABLE. -Peter -- Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP Key E8048D08 | "The bits must flow" From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 00:35:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7485016A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:35:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from web21105.mail.yahoo.com (web21105.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFB2E43FCB for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:35:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20031205083518.88534.qmail@web21105.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.228.74.10] by web21105.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:35:18 PST Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:35:18 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Terribile To: Peter Losher , freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200312041808.02318.Peter_Losher@isc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Broadcom 4401 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 08:35:19 -0000 Peter Losher writes: > ... Mark Terribile wrote: > > Does anyone have a driver for the Broadcom 4401 NIC on FreeBSD 4.9? > > The bfe (used to be bcm) driver only works under -current, and will be in > 5.2 when it's released next year. That's the main reason I am running > -current on this laptop (Dell Insprion 5100) Well, I have a copy of bcm from Duncan Barclay and have tweaked it to run in 5.1 . I don't know how close to right I have it, but we'll see over the next couple of weeks. I hope to be able to offer him the mods later today. Mark Terribile __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 09:45:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A4416A4CF for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:45:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.easystreet.com (smtp.easystreet.com [206.26.36.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213BC43FB1 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:45:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tashchuk@easystreet.com) Received: from easystreet.com (dsl-209-162-218-66.dsl.easystreet.com [209.162.218.66]) by smtp.easystreet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59677845CFD; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:45:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3FD0C44B.7070004@easystreet.com> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:45:47 -0800 From: Bohdan Tashchuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Strick References: <200312040835.hB48ZX0F009505@mist.nodomain> In-Reply-To: <200312040835.hB48ZX0F009505@mist.nodomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Incorrect identification of ultra dma ATA cables X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:45:37 -0000 Dan Strick wrote: > > I tried three different 80 conductor UDMA cables. I examined them > carefully. I even checked for correct wiring of the PDIAG/CBLID > signal lines with an ohmmeter. I've got one simple idea for you to try. You probably did this already but you don't say so explicitly. The 80 conductor cables are color coded. Blue connector goes to the motherboard, black connector to the master drive, grey connector to the slave drive. Did you plug the cable in the right way? From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 10:02:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358E416A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:02:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06B543FDF for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:02:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 28123 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 18:02:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 18:02:44 -0000 Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 20:03:35 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Bohdan Tashchuk Message-Id: <20031205200335.5ac50bb9.itetcu@apropo.ro> In-Reply-To: <3FD0C44B.7070004@easystreet.com> References: <200312040835.hB48ZX0F009505@mist.nodomain> <3FD0C44B.7070004@easystreet.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Dan Strick cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Incorrect identification of ultra dma ATA cables X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:02:49 -0000 On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:45:47 -0800 Bohdan Tashchuk wrote: > Dan Strick wrote: > > > > I tried three different 80 conductor UDMA cables. I examined them > > carefully. I even checked for correct wiring of the PDIAG/CBLID > > signal lines with an ohmmeter. > > I've got one simple idea for you to try. You probably did this already > but you don't say so explicitly. > > The 80 conductor cables are color coded. Blue connector goes to the > motherboard, black connector to the master drive, grey connector to the > slave drive. :) Well, I'm just sitting here and waching a few 80 conductor cables and they are: black - black - black x 3 black - grey - black x 5 blue - grey - black x 1 red - grey - black x 1 And the nice thing is that all are from Gigabyte motherboards boxes. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 12:28:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942AD16A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:28:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.covadmail.net (mx05.covadmail.net [63.65.120.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 405DE43FBD for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:28:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from strick@covad.net) Received: (covad.net 22780 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 20:28:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mist.nodomain) (67.101.98.171) by sun-qmail03 with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 20:28:10 -0000 Received: from mist.nodomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mist.nodomain (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB5KS1Eo001286; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:28:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@mist.nodomain) Received: (from dan@localhost) by mist.nodomain (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hB5KS1WN001285; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:28:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:28:01 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Strick Message-Id: <200312052028.hB5KS1WN001285@mist.nodomain> To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG cc: itetcu@apropo.ro cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: tashchuk@easystreet.com cc: dan@mist.nodomain Subject: Re: Incorrect identification of ultra dma ATA cables X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:28:19 -0000 Dan Strick wrote: > > I tried three different 80 conductor UDMA cables. I examined them > carefully. I even checked for correct wiring of the PDIAG/CBLID > signal lines with an ohmmeter. Then Bohdan Tashchuk wrote: > > I've got one simple idea for you to try. You probably did this already > but you don't say so explicitly. > > The 80 conductor cables are color coded. Blue connector goes to the > motherboard, black connector to the master drive, grey connector to the > slave drive. > > Did you plug the cable in the right way? Then Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Well, I'm just sitting here and waching a few 80 conductor cables and > they are: > black - black - black x 3 > black - grey - black x 5 > blue - grey - black x 1 > red - grey - black x 1 > > And the nice thing is that all are from Gigabyte motherboards boxes. >>> Yes, I plugged the cables in the right way. The motherboard end, which is supposed to use a blue socket connector, is the end that is not connected to the PDIAG/CBLID signal line. My Gigabyte motheboard did come with some astonishingly gaudy UDMA cables. Two were bright yellow with green (instead of blue) host end connectors and a bright red stripe along the conductor#1 edge of the cable. One grey cable had a red (instead of blue) connector. As near as I can tell, the electrons still drift along at pretty much the same old speed regardless of the color. Dan Strick strick@covad.net From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 6 01:48:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974F016A4CF for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 01:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CAE43F93 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 01:48:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 26953 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2003 09:48:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 09:48:27 -0000 Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 11:49:23 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Dan Strick Message-Id: <20031206114923.2b9dd3b2.itetcu@apropo.ro> In-Reply-To: <200312052028.hB5KS1WN001285@mist.nodomain> References: <200312052028.hB5KS1WN001285@mist.nodomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: tashchuk@easystreet.com cc: dan@mist.nodomain cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Incorrect identification of ultra dma ATA cables X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 09:48:31 -0000 On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:28:01 -0800 (PST) Dan Strick wrote: > Dan Strick wrote: > > > > Did you plug the cable in the right way? > > Then Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > Well, I'm just sitting here and waching a few 80 conductor cables and > > they are: > > black - black - black x 3 > > black - grey - black x 5 > > blue - grey - black x 1 > > red - grey - black x 1 > > > > And the nice thing is that all are from Gigabyte motherboards boxes. > >>> > > Yes, I plugged the cables in the right way. The motherboard end, which > is supposed to use a blue socket connector, is the end that is not > connected to the PDIAG/CBLID signal line. > > My Gigabyte motheboard did come with some astonishingly gaudy UDMA > cables. Two were bright yellow with green (instead of blue) host > end connectors and a bright red stripe along the conductor#1 edge > of the cable. One grey cable had a red (instead of blue) connector. > As near as I can tell, the electrons still drift along at pretty > much the same old speed regardless of the color. I'm sure the electrons in your cables know the Cristmas is approaching and that's the reason Gigabyte gives us so many different-colored conectors, so they don't slow down on their way. ;-) -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user