From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 11:16:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DC016A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A334400F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8SIFf7R053652; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:15:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)h8SIFf6A053649; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:15:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:15:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: "Adam C. Migus" In-Reply-To: <3F761AF0.3020105@migus.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: John Straiton cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org cc: 'Eric Anderson' Subject: Re: Performance Problems.. Server hardware smoked by $500 box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:16:16 -0000 On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Adam C. Migus wrote: > >>(Production WEB now that it's using apache2. Since we're new to apache2, > >>it's gonna be certainly hokie) > > ... > >This is all speculation of course, but it could be that differences in > >Apache version make up most of the performance difference you see. ... > Thus threading is irrelavent unless he's specifically enabled them, > which, he cannot be using since he's using PHP, which doesn't work with > apache2 threading. I use apache2 on FreeBSD 5.1 RELEASE and find > performance to be as good or better than apache1. ... Well, what I was actually trying to get at, albeit indirectly, is that to properly understand the performance differences between the configurations, the best approach is probably to address one variable at a time: use identical software configurations for the two boxes, and then twiddle the variables and see what the impact of each change is on both boxes. I.e., first sync up the apache versions on the two configurations, and see if the performance gap remains. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories