From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs Sun Jan 26 2:32:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269A937B401 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 02:32:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.musha.org (daemon.musha.org [210.189.104.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402E743F13 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 02:32:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from knu@iDaemons.org) Received: from archon.local.idaemons.org (archon.local.idaemons.org [192.168.1.32]) by mail.musha.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308345195D; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:32:05 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:32:06 +0900 Message-ID: <86znpo42xl.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori MUSHA" To: "."@babolo.ru Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/46854: ports/lang/ruby/files/patch-defines.h includes RCS ids In-Reply-To: <1043541740.202494.9664.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> References: <863cng6bvr.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <1043541740.202494.9664.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.1 (Wonderwall) EMIKO/1.14.1 (Choanoflagellata) LIMIT/1.14.7 (Fujiidera) APEL/10.4 Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 081D 099C 1705 861D 4B70 B04A 920B EFC7 9FD9 E1EE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.14.1 - "Choanoflagellata") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At Sun, 26 Jan 2003 03:42:20 +0300 (MSK), "."@babolo.ru wrote: > Using ports tree as is without changes is not > the only model of use. > Propagation tweaked tree via cvs > can screw RCS Ids. That is the misconfiguration. You are supposed to use the FreeBSD version of CVS (or a compatible one) with a correct CVSROOT, or just CVSup. Otherwise $FreeBSD$ tags are not properly expanded and other problems could occur, like, well, patch conflicts. > Yes you are free to not clean up diffs > from unnecessary chunks if want. You know, it is not good manners to modify a diff by hand. Suppose if the RCS tag line were part of a big chunk. I could of course apply the diff partly and then regenerate a patch, but note that that kinds of irrelevant tasks can be too much to ask of a maintainer. -- / /__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org / ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp "It went right by me -- At the time it went over my head I was looking out the window.. I should have looked at your face instead" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports-bugs" in the body of the message