From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 4 20:07:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A7937B401 for ; Sun, 4 May 2003 20:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from willie.blueskylabs.com (adsl-66-159-197-3.dslextreme.com [66.159.197.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6697943F3F for ; Sun, 4 May 2003 20:06:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrew@blueskylabs.com) Received: (qmail 26241 invoked from network); 5 May 2003 03:06:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blueskylabs.com) (10.1.10.25) by adsl-66-159-197-3.dslextreme.com with SMTP; 5 May 2003 03:06:46 -0000 Message-ID: <3EB5D5DC.90808@blueskylabs.com> Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 20:09:16 -0700 From: Andrew Goodney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 20030428 sucessfull on Netra t 1125 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 03:07:00 -0000 I would like to report a sucessful FreeBSD 5.0 snapshot install on a Sun Netra t 1125. It has 2 UltraSPARC-II @296Mhz and 2048MB of RAM. Please see the dmesg below, and thank you for all of your work... -Andrew Goodney andrew@blueskylabs.com --------------- www.blueskylabs.com #dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.0-20030428-SNAP #0: Mon Apr 28 22:27:03 GMT 2003 root@u10.locore.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc048e000. Timecounter "tick" frequency 296000625 Hz real memory = 2121523200 (2023 MB) avail memory = 2048909312 (1953 MB) cpu0: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-II Processor (296.00 MHz CPU) cpu1: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-II Processor (296.00 MHz CPU) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs nexus0: pcib0: on nexus0 pcib0: Psycho, impl 0, version 4, ign 0x7c0 initialializing counter-timer Timecounter "counter-timer" frequency 1000000 Hz DVMA map: 0xfe000000 to 0xffffffff pci0: on pcib0 ebus0: revision 0x01 ebus0: mem 0x71000000-0x717fffff,0x70000000-0x70ffffff at device 1.0 on pci0 ebus0: addr 0x140072f000-0x140072f003,0x140072c000-0x140072c003,0x140072a000-0x140072a003,0x1400728000-0x1400728003,0x1400726000-0x1400726003 (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x1400724000-0x1400724003 (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x1400504000-0x1400504002 (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x1400500000-0x1400500007 (no driver attached) sab0: addr 0x1400400000-0x140040007f irq 43 on ebus0 sabtty0: on sab0 sabtty0: console 9600,8,n,1,- sabtty1: on sab0 ebus0: addr 0x14003083f8-0x14003083ff irq 41 (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x14003062f8-0x14003062ff irq 42 (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x1400700000-0x140070000f,0x1400300398-0x1400300399,0x14003043bc-0x14003043cb irq 34 (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x1400720000-0x1400720003,0x1400706000-0x140070600f,0x14003023f0-0x14003023f7 irq 39 (no driver attached) eeprom0: addr 0x1400000000-0x1400001fff on ebus0 eeprom0: model mk48t59 eeprom0: hostid 80a42496 ebus0: addr 0x1000000000-0x10000fffff (no driver attached) ebus0: addr 0x1400600000-0x1400600009,0x1400200000-0x1400200063 (no driver attached) hme0: mem 0x8000-0xffff irq 33 at device 1.1 on pci0 hme0: Ethernet address: 08:00:20:a4:24:96 miibus0: on hme0 qsphy0: on miibus0 qsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto sym0: <875> port 0x400-0x4ff mem 0x12000-0x12fff,0x10000-0x100ff irq 32 at device 3.0 on pci0 sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking sym1: <875> port 0x800-0x8ff mem 0x16000-0x16fff,0x14000-0x140ff irq 38 at device 3.1 on pci0 sym1: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking pcib1: on nexus0 pcib1: Psycho, impl 0, version 4, ign 0x7c0 pci1: on pcib1 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle cd0 at sym0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 16) cd0: cd present [443544 x 512 byte records] da0 at sym0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 16, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 8637MB (17689267 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1101C) da1 at sym0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 16, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 8637MB (17689267 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1101C) SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0a Invalid time in real time clock. Check and reset the date immediately! From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 02:56:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C6A37B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 02:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237C243F93 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 02:56:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])h459uGE13506; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:56:16 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 11:56:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt To: James Taylor In-Reply-To: <009e01c31053$b8e23bb0$4500a8c0@theplague> Message-ID: <20030505115350.I53365@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <009e01c31053$b8e23bb0$4500a8c0@theplague> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vinum under Sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 09:56:22 -0000 On Thu, 1 May 2003, James Taylor wrote: JT>I'm trying to get vinum setup to create a raid5 array, but am running JT>into some snags due to the lack of disklabel support. From what I JT>understand, to do any partition management you need to run sysinstall to JT>create your partitions. The only options here after creating partitions JT>however is to set it up as either ufs or swap. How would you go about JT>setting the partition type to vinum without being able to run disklabel JT>-e? I did a newfs on my partitions for vinum and then just called vinum to build the array. I don't know why that worked, but it did. harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 07:44:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A6537B405 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB9B43FE1 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 07:44:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 4E617530E; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:44:41 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: sparc64@freebsd.org From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:44:40 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Does FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 14:44:45 -0000 http://www.ofug.org/~des/sunultra.jpg DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 07:47:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9043F37B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 07:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailmx.nps.k12.va.us (mailmx.nps.k12.va.us [216.54.48.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE74A43F3F for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 07:47:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from acrosby@nps.k12.va.us) Received: from Gateway-Message_Server by mailmx.nps.k12.va.us with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 05 May 2003 10:47:54 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.7.1 Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 10:47:36 -0400 From: "Adam Crosby" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 14:47:56 -0000 Depends - does that have the 32 crystal, or the 64 crystal detergent? :) >>> Dag-Erling Smorgrav 05/05/03 10:44AM >>> http://www.ofug.org/~des/sunultra.jpg=20 DES --=20 Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org=20 _______________________________________________ freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64=20 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 07:50:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E67937B40C for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 07:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA10843FB1 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 07:50:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])h45EocE22043 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:50:38 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 16:50:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt To: sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030505164921.O3864@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 14:50:41 -0000 On Mon, 5 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: DS>http://www.ofug.org/~des/sunultra.jpg Oh, that thing is great for fine-grained locking and distributed computing. harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 08:03:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164A537B404 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 08:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (pc1-cdif2-5-cust38.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.101.150.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1919643F3F for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 08:03:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.12) id 19ChUe-00042J-00 for sparc64@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 16:03:04 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 16:03:04 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030505150304.GA15503@submonkey.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 15:03:07 -0000 On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 04:44:40PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > http://www.ofug.org/~des/sunultra.jpg Seriously though, why is the Ultra 1 unsupported? Ceri -- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 08:30:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58ECE37B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 08:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iaces.com (horton.iaces.com [204.147.87.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924D943FB1 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 08:30:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from proot@iaces.com) Received: from iaces.com (ptroot.iaces.com [204.147.87.124]) by iaces.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h45FUbTG009848; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:30:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from proot@iaces.com) Message-ID: <3EB6839D.9090000@iaces.com> Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 10:30:37 -0500 From: Paul Root User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ceri Davies References: <20030505150304.GA15503@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20030505150304.GA15503@submonkey.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 15:30:42 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 04:44:40PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > >>http://www.ofug.org/~des/sunultra.jpg Old SCSI controller and Lance Ethernet instead of HME. -- Paul T. Root E/Mail: proot@iaces.com 600 Stinson Blvd N.E., Fl 1S PAG: +1 (877) 693-7155 Minneapolis, MN 55413 WRK: +1 (612) 664-3385 FAX: +1 (612) 664-4779 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 10:15:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3F437B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org (humbolt.nl.linux.org [131.211.28.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731A343F75 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:15:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from armijn@nl.linux.org) Received: (from localhost user: 'armijn' uid#1008 fake: STDIN (armijn@humbolt.nl.linux.org)) by humbolt.nl.linux.org id ; Mon, 5 May 2003 19:15:40 +0200 Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 19:15:40 +0200 Sender: Armijn Hemel From: Armijn Hemel To: sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030505171540.GA28913@humbolt.geo.uu.nl> References: <20030505150304.GA15503@submonkey.net> <3EB6839D.9090000@iaces.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EB6839D.9090000@iaces.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 17:15:52 -0000 On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:30:37AM -0500, Paul Root wrote: > >>http://www.ofug.org/~des/sunultra.jpg > Old SCSI controller and Lance Ethernet instead of HME. Are there people working on it? If someone in the Netherlands wants to have an Ultra1 on loan for a few months to work on support for it, I think that can be arranged (with additional HME/SCSI card). I will need it back though. armijn -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- armijn@nl.linux.org | http://people.nl.linux.org/~armijn/ | Penguin Power --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://nl.linux.org/ | Alles over Linux --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 10:18:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C8537B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archimedes.tomelliott.net (archimedes.tomelliott.net [81.6.196.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509FA43FAF for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:18:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@tomelliott.net) Received: (qmail 93435 invoked by uid 85); 5 May 2003 17:17:16 -0000 Received: from tom@tomelliott.net by archimedes.tomelliott.net by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.15 (sweep: 2.9/3.56. clamscan: 0.54. Clear:. Processed in 10.546108 secs); 05 May 2003 17:17:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rmto90894701) (81.6.196.158) by archimedes.tomelliott.net with SMTP; 5 May 2003 17:17:03 -0000 Message-ID: <044601c3132a$5b0b7ea0$9ec40651@rmto90894701> From: "Thomas Elliott" To: References: <20030505150304.GA15503@submonkey.net> Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 18:16:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 17:18:50 -0000 Hey Whilst we're on the topic - will it work on this? http://www.inox-uk.com/images/vax2.jpg -- Tom tom@tomelliott.net ICQ: 8018364 MSN: netgeek_uk@hotmail.com Home# +44(0)1634309229 Mobile# +44(0)7764486175 US# +1(917)4386847 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ceri Davies" To: Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 4:03 PM Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD run on this? > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 04:44:40PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > http://www.ofug.org/~des/sunultra.jpg > > Seriously though, why is the Ultra 1 unsupported? > > Ceri > -- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 10:50:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E72C37B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.ie-online.it (mercurio.ie-online.it [212.110.22.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D9343F75 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:50:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sriva@gufi.org) Received: from riva (nat-riva1.ie-online.it [212.110.22.23]) by relay.ie-online.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 806E347B07 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 19:50:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20030505195049.009a0100@civetta.gufi.org> X-Sender: riva@civetta.gufi.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 19:50:49 +0200 To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org From: Stefano Riva In-Reply-To: <20030503031030.GA17896@locore.ca> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: E450 panic - SNAP 20030423 5.0-Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 17:50:52 -0000 At 23.10 02/05/03 -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote: >Please try 5.0-20030502-SNAP, which includes Thomas' fix. Its uploading >now, will be done in a few hours. Hi. I just tried 5.0-20030502-SNAP here (E450 with 1 CPU UltraSPARC-II 248 MHz and 384 MB RAM) and it hangs after "Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle". Same problem with 5.0-RELEASE. A boot -v shows this: (...) Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle (noperiph:sym0:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered. (noperiph:sym1:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered. (noperiph:sym2:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered. (noperiph:sym3:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered. (noperiph:sym4:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered. (noperiph:sym5:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered. GEOM: Configure md0c, start 0 length 4128768 end 4128767 (probe15:sym1:0:0:0): Retrying Command (probe16:sym1:0:1:0): Retrying Command (probe17:sym1:0:2:0): Retrying Command (probe6:sym0:0:6:0): Retrying Command (probe6:sym0:0:6:0): error 22 (probe6:sym0:0:6:0): Unretryable Error The SCSI device 0:6 should be the CDROM drive. The box configuration is as delivered by Sun. It has 2 HD hot swap Seagate Barracuda (Sun original) UW-SCSI 4.3 GB. OpenBoot 3.7. Of course Solaris runs well. Do you need a full dmesg? If so, how can I capture it? Is there something else I can do to help you? Sorry for the stupid questions, but I'm a total newbie here... always used i386. -- Stefano Riva (sriva@gufi.org) Gruppo Utenti FreeBSD Italia - http://www.gufi.org/ From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 12:29:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF137B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imo-r01.mx.aol.com (imo-r01.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05ECE43F85 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:29:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nealelliott@netscape.net) Received: from nealelliott@netscape.net by imo-r01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.22.) id n.1b0.5c0244d (16228) for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 15:29:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netscape.net (star.niddk.nih.gov [128.231.82.93]) by air-in02.mx.aol.com (v93.8) with ESMTP id MAILININ24-3f643eb6bb8f18c; Mon, 05 May 2003 15:29:20 -0400 Message-ID: <3EB6BB8D.5070409@netscape.net> Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 15:29:17 -0400 From: neal elliott User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Subject: FreeBSD usable as a workstation on a blade 100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 19:29:31 -0000 Now I Have FreeBSD installed on my blade 100 system I noticed how much faster it is then solaris. Is there anyone who uses FreeBSD on their blade 100 as a full blown workstation with XFree86 installed and useable? when I connect the usb keyboard to the system then boot into FreeBSD I get a error "panic: pcib unrecoverable DMA error AFAR 0x84008 AFSR 0x4100ff00208" then the system goes in to a endless rebooting loop. has anyone seen this problem before? I'm guessing this must be a USB keyboard related issue; this only happens when I connect the USB keyboard. when I disconnect the keyboard and leave the mouse connected everything works fine I just have to use the serial console. Neal I apologize if this is a duplicate I am having problems with my mail service. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 12:51:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2FD37B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from procyon.firepipe.net (procyon.firepipe.net [198.78.66.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2EC43F3F for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:51:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by procyon.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA00322884; Mon, 5 May 2003 12:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 12:51:56 -0700 From: Will Andrews To: neal elliott Message-ID: <20030505195156.GU26372@procyon.firepipe.net> References: <3EB6BB8D.5070409@netscape.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EB6BB8D.5070409@netscape.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD usable as a workstation on a blade 100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 19:51:58 -0000 On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 03:29:17PM -0400, neal elliott wrote: > > Now I Have FreeBSD installed on my blade 100 system I noticed how much > faster it > is then solaris. Is there anyone who uses FreeBSD on their blade 100 as a > full blown > workstation with XFree86 installed and useable? when I connect the usb > keyboard to > the system then boot into FreeBSD I get a error "panic: pcib unrecoverable > DMA error AFAR 0x84008 AFSR 0x4100ff00208" then the system goes in to a > endless rebooting loop. has anyone seen this problem before? I'm guessing > this must be a USB keyboard related issue; > this only happens when I connect the USB keyboard. when I disconnect the > keyboard and > leave the mouse connected everything works fine I just have to use the > serial console. No, I only use my Blade 100 headless. The USB stack is not usable on FreeBSD/sparc64. X11 servers don't work (AFAIK). That is all on the todo list, but I don't anticipate a Blade 100 being usable as a FreeBSD workstation for a few months at least. Regards, -- wca From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 13:12:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C4137B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 13:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imo-d01.mx.aol.com (imo-d01.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9EF43F75 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 13:12:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nealelliott@netscape.net) Received: from nealelliott@netscape.net by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.22.) id b.eb.88afeee (22683); Mon, 5 May 2003 16:12:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netscape.net (star.niddk.nih.gov [128.231.82.93]) by air-in04.mx.aol.com (v93.12) with ESMTP id MAILININ44-589b3eb6c597f8; Mon, 05 May 2003 16:12:07 -0400 Message-ID: <3EB6C594.3040605@netscape.net> Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:12:04 -0400 From: neal elliott User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: will@csociety.org References: <3EB6BB8D.5070409@netscape.net> <20030505195156.GU26372@procyon.firepipe.net> X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD usable as a workstation on a blade 100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 20:12:18 -0000 where is the todo list for FreeBSD on a blade 100? will@csociety.org wrote: >On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 03:29:17PM -0400, neal elliott wrote: > > >> >> Now I Have FreeBSD installed on my blade 100 system I noticed how much >> faster it >>is then solaris. Is there anyone who uses FreeBSD on their blade 100 as a >>full blown >>workstation with XFree86 installed and useable? when I connect the usb >>keyboard to >>the system then boot into FreeBSD I get a error "panic: pcib unrecoverable >>DMA error AFAR 0x84008 AFSR 0x4100ff00208" then the system goes in to a >>endless rebooting loop. has anyone seen this problem before? I'm guessing >>this must be a USB keyboard related issue; >>this only happens when I connect the USB keyboard. when I disconnect the >>keyboard and >>leave the mouse connected everything works fine I just have to use the >>serial console. >> >> > >No, I only use my Blade 100 headless. The USB stack is not >usable on FreeBSD/sparc64. X11 servers don't work (AFAIK). That >is all on the todo list, but I don't anticipate a Blade 100 being >usable as a FreeBSD workstation for a few months at least. > >Regards, > > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 16:01:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022C937B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F30643FBD for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:01:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F61566B9B; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DCDA513E0; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 16:01:11 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Thomas Elliott Message-ID: <20030505230111.GA33071@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030505150304.GA15503@submonkey.net> <044601c3132a$5b0b7ea0$9ec40651@rmto90894701> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <044601c3132a$5b0b7ea0$9ec40651@rmto90894701> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 23:01:13 -0000 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:16:55PM +0100, Thomas Elliott wrote: > Hey > Whilst we're on the topic - will it work on this? >=20 > http://www.inox-uk.com/images/vax2.jpg No, but try NetBSD. Kris --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+tu03Wry0BWjoQKURAlzNAKD4leK0DDiB5kAxdMyF0pUHr/Zb6gCdETZU TRQyvkgJeB1oodfKyrYHMmw= =IDrW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 6 11:15:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B410C37B404 for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 11:15:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sigma.freebsdhackers.net (loaks-171-132.goldengate.net [216.250.171.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551D043FCB for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 11:15:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shane@freebsdhackers.net) Received: by sigma.freebsdhackers.net (Postfix, from userid 1099) id 6912E6AB; Tue, 6 May 2003 13:15:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sigma.freebsdhackers.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B03679 for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 13:15:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 13:15:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Shane Kinney To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030506130913.O912-100000@sigma.freebsdhackers.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: GDB Bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 18:15:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm having some issues with GDB 5.2 on my Sun Ultra 10 (UltraSPARC IIi) which is running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE (GENERIC Kernel), that I don't see a problem report for, but I don't know if it is a bug or not. If I create a small C program like this (in a file called test.c): #include int main(void) { printf("sup\n"); return(0); } Then compile it with these flags: gcc -g -o test test.c When I try to step through the program with GDB I get this error: This GDB was configured as "sparc64-portbld-freebsd5.0"... (gdb) break main Breakpoint 1 at 0x1007a4: file test.c, line 4. (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/home/mod6/test warning: Cannot insert breakpoint -2: Error accessing memory address 0x2ac0: Bad address. Anyone know what this might be? Any help would be greatly appreciated! If you need more information, please let me know. Thanks, ~Shane Kinney pgp key: http://www.freebsdhackers.net/pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE+t/uuIyUr/yoGQnYRAsk0AJ99427xPxKiMp+Hp0rjkUIXWUkSywCeL1ui QGMNMy94G1MxfuLlP3Hj8Jo= =Bagw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 05:52:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EE237B401 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 05:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pump2.york.ac.uk (pump2.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E846F43F75 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 05:52:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (ury.york.ac.uk [144.32.108.81]) by pump2.york.ac.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h47Cqf9T018113 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:52:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (localhost.york.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h47CqeJF084262 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:52:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from localhost (gavin@localhost)h47CqeJb084259 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:52:40 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: ury.york.ac.uk: gavin owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 13:52:40 +0100 (BST) From: Gavin Atkinson X-X-Sender: gavin@ury.york.ac.uk To: sparc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030507133151.J83370-100000@ury.york.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Missing memory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 12:52:44 -0000 I have FreeBSD on an Ultra 5, and it does not seem to detect all my ram... Am I overlooking something obvious? The machine has 64 meg of ram, but FreeBSD only finds 39 meg (and only 33 meg is usable). Where does the other 24 meg go? I've included the relevant parts of a dmesg, verbose reveals nothing extra. I'm assuming the kernel etc accounts for the difference between "real" and "avail" memory, but I cannot figure out where the rest of my memory goes. Any suggestions? Sun Ultra 5/10 UPA/PCI (UltraSPARC-IIi 270MHz), No Keyboard OpenBoot 3.11, 64 MB memory installed, Serial #10249974. Ethernet address 8:0:20:9c:66:f6, Host ID: 809c66f6. [snip] FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT 4: Wed Apr 30 17:20:49 BST 2003 root@leeloo.york.ac.uk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc048e000. Timecounter "tick" frequency 269833437 Hz real memory = 41181184 (39 MB) avail memory = 34758656 (33 MB) cpu0: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-IIi Processor (269.83 MHz CPU) Thanks, Gavin From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 09:10:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37DF37B401 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 09:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [207.200.153.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3D343FA3 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 09:10:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 19DPup-0003h6-00; Wed, 7 May 2003 07:29:03 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 07:28:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: Ceri Davies In-Reply-To: <20030505150304.GA15503@submonkey.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD run on this? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 16:10:39 -0000 On Mon, 5 May 2003, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 04:44:40PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > http://www.ofug.org/~des/sunultra.jpg > > Seriously though, why is the Ultra 1 unsupported? > Well, just some of the on-board controllers don't work, because there aren't drivers for them yet. I think that people are having trouble getting excited about a writing drivers for a $25 computer. Tom From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 15:08:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C079E37B405 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.65.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F397643FA3 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:08:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmoestl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 26675 invoked by uid 65534); 7 May 2003 22:08:24 -0000 Received: from p508E6C74.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO galatea.local) (80.142.108.116) by mail.gmx.net (mp008-rz3) with SMTP; 08 May 2003 00:08:24 +0200 Received: from tmm by galatea.local with local (Exim 4.14 #1) id 19DX8Q-0000cJ-Sf; Thu, 08 May 2003 00:11:34 +0200 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 00:11:34 +0200 From: Thomas Moestl To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20030507221133.GA678@crow.dom2ip.de> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Kennaway , Eric Anholt , sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030116072448.GA29468@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030116201728.GA279@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030408003332.GA60864@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030408003332.GA60864@rot13.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: Thomas Moestl cc: Eric Anholt cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: assembler error in XFree86 snapshot X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 22:08:28 -0000 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, 2003/04/07 at 17:33:32 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > This is a arguably a gcc bug. All (13-bit) immediate operands are > > sign-extended, even those to instructions which operate on unsigned > > values, so umul can handle a range of very small and a range of very > > large operands. gcc correctly recognizes that it can use an immediate > > here; however, it chooses to output it as an unsigned number and does > > not sign-extended it from 32 to 64 bit. > > > > All sign extensions for instructions are made to the full 64 bit > > however (even if umul only happens to use 32 of those), so when the > > assembler checks whether a value is representable as an immediate, it > > will check that the 64-bit sign extension of the immediate creates > > the desired value (in sparc64 mode), i.e. it doesn't ignore the upper > > 32 bits even if a particular instruction does not use them. > > > > One solution is to generate negative literals for immediates if we > > mean them to be sign-extended (which gcc does already for some other > > instructions). The attached patch implements this, I'm not sure it > > uses the best possible way to do this though, and it also needs a bit > > more testing. > > *Ping* > > Someone needs to take this up with the gcc developers so it can get fixed. Sorry, I didn't have time to get this done for 5.2. The attached patch should work around the bug however; Eric, could you please add it to XFree86-4-libraries, until the problem is resolved in gcc or gas, so that there can be a package for the release? Thanks, - Thomas -- Thomas Moestl http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0015675/ http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tmm/ PGP fingerprint: 1C97 A604 2BD0 E492 51D0 9C0F 1FE6 4F1D 419C 776C --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xres.diff" --- lib/XRes/XRes.c.orig Wed Oct 16 02:37:26 2002 +++ lib/XRes/XRes.c Wed May 7 23:44:38 2003 @@ -218,7 +218,13 @@ } #ifdef LONG64 +#ifdef __sparc64__ + /* The first assignment is to work around a bug in gcc/gas on sparc64. */ + *bytes = rep.bytes_overflow; + *bytes = (*bytes * 4294967295) + rep.bytes; +#else *bytes = (rep.bytes_overflow * 4294967295) + rep.bytes; +#endif #else *bytes = rep.bytes_overflow ? 0xffffffff : rep.bytes; #endif --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 15:34:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8AA37B401 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.65.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FC5443FAF for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:34:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tmoestl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 9135 invoked by uid 65534); 7 May 2003 22:34:14 -0000 Received: from p508E6C74.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO galatea.local) (80.142.108.116) by mail.gmx.net (mp007-rz3) with SMTP; 08 May 2003 00:34:14 +0200 Received: from tmm by galatea.local with local (Exim 4.14 #1) id 19DXXQ-0000hm-Jv; Thu, 08 May 2003 00:37:24 +0200 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 00:37:24 +0200 From: Thomas Moestl To: Kris Kennaway , Eric Anholt , sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20030507223724.GA2606@crow.dom2ip.de> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Kennaway , Eric Anholt , sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030116072448.GA29468@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030116201728.GA279@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030408003332.GA60864@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030507221133.GA678@crow.dom2ip.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030507221133.GA678@crow.dom2ip.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: Thomas Moestl Subject: Re: assembler error in XFree86 snapshot X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 22:34:17 -0000 On Thu, 2003/05/08 at 00:11:34 +0200, Thomas Moestl wrote: > On Mon, 2003/04/07 at 17:33:32 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > > This is a arguably a gcc bug. All (13-bit) immediate operands are > > > sign-extended, even those to instructions which operate on unsigned > > > values, so umul can handle a range of very small and a range of very > > > large operands. gcc correctly recognizes that it can use an immediate > > > here; however, it chooses to output it as an unsigned number and does > > > not sign-extended it from 32 to 64 bit. > > > > > > All sign extensions for instructions are made to the full 64 bit > > > however (even if umul only happens to use 32 of those), so when the > > > assembler checks whether a value is representable as an immediate, it > > > will check that the 64-bit sign extension of the immediate creates > > > the desired value (in sparc64 mode), i.e. it doesn't ignore the upper > > > 32 bits even if a particular instruction does not use them. > > > > > > One solution is to generate negative literals for immediates if we > > > mean them to be sign-extended (which gcc does already for some other > > > instructions). The attached patch implements this, I'm not sure it > > > uses the best possible way to do this though, and it also needs a bit > > > more testing. > > > > *Ping* > > > > Someone needs to take this up with the gcc developers so it can get fixed. > > Sorry, I didn't have time to get this done for 5.2. 5.1, even. Need sleep. - Thomas -- Thomas Moestl http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0015675/ http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tmm/ PGP fingerprint: 1C97 A604 2BD0 E492 51D0 9C0F 1FE6 4F1D 419C 776C From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 15:39:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9A937B401 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lewis.lclark.edu (sunfire.lclark.edu [149.175.1.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3958343FAF for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:39:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anholt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by lewis.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.1.45) with SMTP id M2003050715383813978 ; Wed, 07 May 2003 15:38:38 -0700 From: Eric Anholt To: Thomas Moestl In-Reply-To: <20030507221133.GA678@crow.dom2ip.de> References: <20030116072448.GA29468@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030116201728.GA279@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030408003332.GA60864@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030507221133.GA678@crow.dom2ip.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1052347524.1070.10.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 07 May 2003 15:45:25 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: assembler error in XFree86 snapshot X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 22:39:19 -0000 On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 15:11, Thomas Moestl wrote: > On Mon, 2003/04/07 at 17:33:32 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > > This is a arguably a gcc bug. All (13-bit) immediate operands are > > > sign-extended, even those to instructions which operate on unsigned > > > values, so umul can handle a range of very small and a range of very > > > large operands. gcc correctly recognizes that it can use an immediate > > > here; however, it chooses to output it as an unsigned number and does > > > not sign-extended it from 32 to 64 bit. > > > > > > All sign extensions for instructions are made to the full 64 bit > > > however (even if umul only happens to use 32 of those), so when the > > > assembler checks whether a value is representable as an immediate, it > > > will check that the 64-bit sign extension of the immediate creates > > > the desired value (in sparc64 mode), i.e. it doesn't ignore the upper > > > 32 bits even if a particular instruction does not use them. > > > > > > One solution is to generate negative literals for immediates if we > > > mean them to be sign-extended (which gcc does already for some other > > > instructions). The attached patch implements this, I'm not sure it > > > uses the best possible way to do this though, and it also needs a bit > > > more testing. > > > > *Ping* > > > > Someone needs to take this up with the gcc developers so it can get fixed. > > Sorry, I didn't have time to get this done for 5.2. The attached patch > should work around the bug however; Eric, could you please add it to > XFree86-4-libraries, until the problem is resolved in gcc or gas, so > that there can be a package for the release? > > Thanks, > - Thomas Done. Thanks for the patch. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 09:24:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4B637B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 09:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41306.mail.yahoo.com (web41306.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAEA443F75 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 09:24:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from baby_p_nut@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030508162444.92388.qmail@web41306.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [198.80.171.28] by web41306.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 May 2003 09:24:44 PDT Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:24:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Baby Peanut To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: FreeBSD 5.1-BETA on Ultra-2 with ISP panics X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 16:24:47 -0000 But at least the ISP bug was fixed. Sun Ultra 2 UPA/SBus (2 X UltraSPARC 200MHz), No Keyboard OpenBoot 3.11, 768 MB memory installed, Serial #8830939. Ethernet address 8:0:20:86:bf:db, Host ID: 8086bfdb. Rebooting with command: boot /sbus@1f,0/QLGC,isp@3,10000/sd@2,0:a Boot device: /sbus@1f,0/QLGC,isp@3,10000/sd@2,0:a File and args: >> FreeBSD/sparc64 boot block Boot path: /sbus@1f,0/QLGC,isp@3,10000/sd@2,0:a Boot loader: /boot/loader Console: OpenFirmware console FreeBSD/sparc64 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.0 (kstailey@netman.kenland.etc, Tue Apr 22 22:15:02 EDT 2003) bootpath="/sbus@1f,0/QLGC,isp@3,10000/sd@2,0:a" WARNING: attempt to free non dma-alloc'd range: -2000 2000 Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf WARNING: attempt to free non dma-alloc'd range: -2000 2000 WARNING: attempt to free non dma-alloc'd range: -2000 2000 WARNING: attempt to free non dma-alloc'd range: -2000 2000 WARNING: attempt to free non dma-alloc'd range: -2000 2000 /boot/kernel/kernel data=0x36bd08+0x86ea8 syms=[0x8+0x52068+0x8+0x3ffa1] Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]... nothing to autoload yet. jumping to kernel entry at 0xc0040000. stray vector interrupt 2033 Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.1-BETA #8: Thu May 8 12:07:28 EDT 2003 babypeanut@sparky.pea.nut:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0488000. Timecounter "tick" frequency 200000921 Hz real memory = 779337728 (743 MB) avail memory = 749543424 (714 MB) cpu0: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-I Processor (200.00 MHz CPU) cpu1: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-I Processor (200.00 MHz CPU) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs nexus0: sbus0: clock 25.000 MHz DVMA map: 0xfc000000 to 0xffffffff initialializing counter-timer Timecounter "counter-timer" frequency 1000000 Hz sbus0: on nexus0 sbus0: , type (unknown) (no driver attached) sbus0: , type (unknown) (no driver attached) sbus0: , type (unknown) (no driver attached) sbus0: , type block (no driver attached) eeprom0: mem 0x1200000-0x1201fff on sbus0 eeprom0: model mk48t59 eeprom0: hostid 8086bfdb zs0: mem 0x1100000-0x1100003 irq 2024 on sbus0 zstty0: on zs0 zstty0: console 9600,8,n,1,- zstty1: on zs0 sbus0: , type serial (no driver attached) sbus0: , type (unknown) (no driver attached) sbus0: , type (unknown) (no driver attached) sbus0: , type scsi (no driver attached) hme0: mem 0x8c07000-0x8c0701f,0x8c06000-0x8c07fff,0x8c 04000-0x8c05fff,0x8c02000-0x8c03fff,0x8c00000-0x8c00107 irq 2017 on sbus0 hme0: Ethernet address: 08:00:20:86:bf:db miibus0: on hme0 nsphy0: on miibus0 nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto sbus0: , type (unknown) (no driver attached) sbus0: , type display (no driver attached) isp0 mem 0x10000-0x1044f irq 2011 on sbus0 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle da0 at isp0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 20.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 12, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 17274MB (35378533 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2202C) SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0a hw.bus.devctl_disable: 0 -> 1 Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point. swapon: adding /dev/da0b as swap device Starting file system checks: /dev/da0a: FILESYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/da0a: clean, 28579 free (259 frags, 3540 blocks, 0.4% fragmentation) /dev/da0e: FILESYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/da0e: clean, 130379 free (19 frags, 16295 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) /dev/da0f: FILESYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/da0f: clean, 7656325 free (30189 frags, 953267 blocks, 0.4% fragmentation) /dev/da0d: FILESYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/da0d: clean, 129012 free (92 frags, 16115 blocks, 0.1% fragmentation) Doing initial network setup: host.conf hostname. module_register: module hme/miibus already exists! Module hme/miibus failed to register: 17 module_register: module pci/hme already exists! Module pci/hme failed to register: 17 module_register: module sbus/hme already exists! Module sbus/hme failed to register: 17 hme0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::a00:20ff:fe86:bfdb%hme0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 172.27.15.103 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 172.27.15.255 ether 08:00:20:86:bf:db media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 Additional routing options:. Mounting NFS file systems:. Starting syslogd. May 8 12:16:27 netman syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Starting ntpdate. Starting rpcbind. ELF ldconfig path: /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/local/lib Starting local daemons:. Updating motd. Starting ntpd. Starting sshd. Starting sendmail. Initial sparc64 initialization:. Additional ABI support:. Local package initialization:. Additional TCP options:. Starting inetd. Starting cron. Starting background file system checks. Thu May 8 12:16:38 EDT 2003 panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started cpuid = 0; Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x1c: ta %xcc, 1 db> trace panic() at panic+0x134 initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1() at initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1+0x32c softdep_disk_io_initiation() at softdep_disk_io_initiation+0x80 spec_xstrategy() at spec_xstrategy+0x134 spec_specstrategy() at spec_specstrategy+0x8 spec_vnoperate() at spec_vnoperate+0x1c bwrite() at bwrite+0x3b8 vfs_bio_awrite() at vfs_bio_awrite+0x1a0 vop_stdfsync() at vop_stdfsync+0x120 spec_fsync() at spec_fsync+0x20 spec_vnoperate() at spec_vnoperate+0x1c ffs_sync() at ffs_sync+0x348 sync() at sync+0xcc syscall() at syscall+0x2a8 -- syscall (36, FreeBSD ELF64, sync) %o7=0x105e44 -- userland() at 0x10e4c8 user trace: trap %o7=0x105e44 pc 0x10e4c8, sp 0x7fdfffff311 pc 0x1001f0, sp 0x7fdfffff3e1 pc 0, sp 0x7fdfffff4a1 done db> __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 10:55:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFF337B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h132-197-179-27.gte.com (h132-197-179-27.gte.com [132.197.179.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDD843FBF; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:55:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ak03@gte.com) Received: from kanpc.gte.com (ak03@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h48HtC3D002763; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:55:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ak03@kanpc.gte.com) Received: (from ak03@localhost) by kanpc.gte.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h48HtCsP002762; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:55:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:55:12 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030508175512.GA2542@kanpc.gte.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: RTLD patch for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 17:55:16 -0000 Hi, this is a call for testers. I am looking for people willing to test the patch at http://http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/rtld1.diff on non-i386 architectures. The patch unifies legacy locking code into a single platform independent implementation using machine/atomic.h macros. This is done in preparation for a new locking interface in rtld and in order to simplify the future maintenance. I believe disasters are highly unlikely, but make sure you have an old copy of your /usr/libexec/rtld-elf.so.1 available nonetheless. Large multithreaded applications like mozilla of KDE are of special interest. Please let me know of any new failures you didn;t see before the patch. Thanks in advance, -- Alexander Kabaev From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 13:51:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F059337B404; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE8143F85; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A59566CFB; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 186821024; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:51:23 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: ports@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LTeJQqWS0MN7I/qa" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: nntpcache broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 20:51:24 -0000 --LTeJQqWS0MN7I/qa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/nntpcache-3.0.1.log Can someone please investigate and/or report to the developers? Kris --LTeJQqWS0MN7I/qa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+usNKWry0BWjoQKURArkyAJ9xINJbyBmcbIbRuUYPWXfaYZTJpgCeOtza r7vWGJGHLSuMc5H/kI3Rk1I= =DO5d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LTeJQqWS0MN7I/qa-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 13:54:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592F237B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA2D43F85; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:54:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E5266B9B; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:54:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 09CEDE5C; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:54:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:54:36 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030508205436.GF17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="924gEkU1VlJlwnwX" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: kan@FreeBSD.org cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: All gcc ports broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 20:54:38 -0000 --924gEkU1VlJlwnwX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/gcc-2.7.2.3.log http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/gcc-2.8.1.log http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/gcc-3.1.1_20020909.log http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/gcc-3.3_20030421.log (ICE during compiler build) The older ports should be marked ONLY_FOR_ARCHES since they do not have support for most platforms. Can someone look into this? Kris --924gEkU1VlJlwnwX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+usQMWry0BWjoQKURAkfpAKCapnbRuCCFpw4lxCN41vr65OsijgCgjyrR AlkYkDJrBLJHUop7c6g1sb0= =IDeI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --924gEkU1VlJlwnwX-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 14:39:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BBE37B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 14:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C825C43F93; Thu, 8 May 2003 14:39:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h48Ldoc4078192; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:39:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h48Ldjln078191; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:39:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 23:39:45 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:51:23PM -0700 cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nntpcache broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 21:39:54 -0000 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:51:23PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/nntpcache-3.0.1.log > > Can someone please investigate and/or report to the developers? > Compiles fine here on -current as of yesterday. http://quad.zeist.de/nntpcache.log From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 14:50:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D530E37B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net (pimout2-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB0E43F93 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jtx@hatesville.com) Received: from theplague (adsl-64-175-107-84.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.175.107.84])h48LoH3U126716 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 17:50:21 -0400 From: "James Taylor" To: Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 14:50:55 -0700 Message-ID: <005701c315ab$e7a1fe10$0000fea9@theplague> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: Can't write partition information X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 21:50:24 -0000 I have three disks, da0,da1 and da2 I'm trying to create new partitions for. Disklabel doesn't work, so I'm running sysinstall. I was able to re-partition the drives in the past, but I've created/deleted each probably 2 or 3 times now. Now, whenever I try and write updated partition data, I'm getting "Error: Unable to write data to disk da0!". Same thing goes for disks da1 and da2. Not doing anything too exotic here in the layout either. Pretty basic actually: Disk: da1 Partition name: da1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- da1d /b 34985MB UFS1+S Y No matter what I do, it keeps telling me it's unable to write data to the disks. Any ideas on this one? From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 14:55:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301BA37B404 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 14:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net (pimout2-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CCB43F93 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 14:55:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jtx@hatesville.com) Received: from theplague (adsl-64-175-107-84.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.175.107.84])h48Lt23U026630 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 17:55:11 -0400 From: "James Taylor" To: Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 14:55:41 -0700 Message-ID: <005901c315ac$949f4550$0000fea9@theplague> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <005701c315ab$e7a1fe10$0000fea9@theplague> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Can't write partition information X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 21:55:14 -0000 Ah, to further explain the problem, it looks as though disks da0,da1 and da2 each already have partition information Created and written, however, there are no mount points set. Disk: da0 Partition name: da0 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- da0d 34985MB * I go to delete da0d, create new, but it won't write. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of James Taylor Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 2:51 PM To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Can't write partition information I have three disks, da0,da1 and da2 I'm trying to create new partitions for. Disklabel doesn't work, so I'm running sysinstall. I was able to re-partition the drives in the past, but I've created/deleted each probably 2 or 3 times now. Now, whenever I try and write updated partition data, I'm getting "Error: Unable to write data to disk da0!". Same thing goes for disks da1 and da2. Not doing anything too exotic here in the layout either. Pretty basic actually: Disk: da1 Partition name: da1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- da1d /b 34985MB UFS1+S Y No matter what I do, it keeps telling me it's unable to write data to the disks. Any ideas on this one? _______________________________________________ freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 15:19:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943ED37B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 15:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE87643F75; Thu, 8 May 2003 15:19:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EB566B9B; Thu, 8 May 2003 15:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2F812103D; Thu, 8 May 2003 15:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 15:19:00 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: nntpcache broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 22:19:01 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:39:45PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:51:23PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/nntpcache-3.0.1.log > >=20 > > Can someone please investigate and/or report to the developers? > >=20 >=20 > Compiles fine here on -current as of yesterday. > http://quad.zeist.de/nntpcache.log Do you have malloc debugging enabled (the default setting)? Kris --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+utfTWry0BWjoQKURAqV9AKDnAzBxMruXXzywJS+ymwvwHgaijQCghGRo /W3lu8hw/lf/pk142L829VA= =Q0Yi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 15:37:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009AF37B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 15:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.redlinenetworks.com (mail.redlinenetworks.com [216.136.145.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD2843F85 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 15:37:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sewall@ix.netcom.com) Received: from ix.netcom.com (melkor.redlinenetworks.com [192.168.0.8]) by mail.redlinenetworks.com (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h48MbwM00643 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 15:37:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sewall@ix.netcom.com) Message-ID: <3EBADC46.2080707@ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 15:37:58 -0700 From: Scott Sewall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Installing on Ultra10 serial port X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 22:37:59 -0000 I'm trying to install FreeBSD onto an Ultra10. What's the default settings for the serial port? -- Scott From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 17:01:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5092C37B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 17:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E711443F93 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 17:01:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D6F8F72FD1; Thu, 8 May 2003 17:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FED72FCC for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 17:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 17:01:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030508164414.X44260@carver.gumbysoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: someone working on fas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 00:01:02 -0000 I'm sure you hear this all the time, but is someone actively working on a driver for the fas SCSI controllers? If not, then I'll take a crack at it -- I have an Ultra 1 200E, I just need the specs or something to steal from. Hints? -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 17:26:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5569937B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 17:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.det2.ameritech.net (mailhost1-sfldmi.sfldmi.ameritech.net [206.141.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2B943FA3 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 17:26:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wmeahan@wa8tzg.org) Received: from webserv.wa8tzg.org ([67.38.23.103]) by mailhost.det2.ameritech.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with ESMTP <20030509002621.CKZU8853.mailhost.det2.ameritech.net@webserv.wa8tzg.org> for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 20:26:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.73.99] (helo=spyplane.wa8tzg.org) by webserv.wa8tzg.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Dvcw-0000mJ-00 for ; Thu, 08 May 2003 20:20:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 20:26:16 -0400 From: Bill Meahan To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030508202616.114d7c94.wmeahan@wa8tzg.org> In-Reply-To: <20030508164414.X44260@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20030508164414.X44260@carver.gumbysoft.com> Organization: What, Me Organized? X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-sun-solaris2.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: someone working on fas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 00:26:23 -0000 On Thu, 8 May 2003 17:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Doug White wrote: > I'm sure you hear this all the time, but is someone actively working > on a driver for the fas SCSI controllers? If not, then I'll take a > crack at it-- I have an Ultra 1 200E, I just need the specs or > something to steal from. > And I have an Ultra 2 2x300 for testing under SMP. I last wrote device drivers (more like full-blown RTOS "executives" with drivers for a variety of unusual devices) something like 15-20 years ago so I'm probably much too rusty to help much otherwise. -- Bill Meahan WA8TZG From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 18:30:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB8437B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 18:30:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brainlink.com (mail.brainlink.com [66.228.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA35743F85 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 18:30:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anthony@brainlink.com) Received: from [24.185.4.7] (HELO superior.local.non-standard.net) by brainlink.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.3) with ESMTP id 19582815 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 May 2003 21:30:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 21:24:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Anthony Volodkin X-X-Sender: anthony@superior.local.non-standard.net To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030508164414.X44260@carver.gumbysoft.com> Message-ID: <20030508200602.T12233-100000@superior.local.non-standard.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: someone working on fas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 01:30:44 -0000 Hey, I have an Ultra 2 here that has that controller as well. So if you ever need me to try anything out, let me know. I am very interested in getting the controller support to work since then i can stop netbooting this box :) -Anthony Volodkin On Thu, 8 May 2003, Doug White wrote: > I'm sure you hear this all the time, but is someone actively working on a > driver for the fas SCSI controllers? If not, then I'll take a crack at it > -- I have an Ultra 1 200E, I just need the specs or something to steal > from. > > Hints? > > -- > Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve > dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 23:21:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE47137B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115FC43FAF for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:21:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h496Ldm2016093; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:21:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h496LdrM016092; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 23:21:39 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Scott Sewall Message-ID: <20030509062139.GA16064@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <3EBADC46.2080707@ix.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EBADC46.2080707@ix.netcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Installing on Ultra10 serial port X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 06:21:53 -0000 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 03:37:58PM -0700, Scott Sewall wrote: > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD onto an Ultra10. > What's the default settings for the serial port? 9600-8N1 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 23:22:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E369037B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E789D43F85; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:22:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h496MOc4084018; Fri, 9 May 2003 08:22:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h496MJgF084017; Fri, 9 May 2003 08:22:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 08:22:19 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Thu, May 08, 2003 at 03:19:00PM -0700 cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nntpcache broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 06:22:27 -0000 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 03:19:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:39:45PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:51:23PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/nntpcache-3.0.1.log > > > > > > Can someone please investigate and/or report to the developers? > > > > > > > Compiles fine here on -current as of yesterday. > > http://quad.zeist.de/nntpcache.log > > Do you have malloc debugging enabled (the default setting)? > Initially not but setting malloc.conf to 'AJ' or 'AZ' doesn't make mmap_tests dump core here either. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 23:24:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C93737B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6929A43FA3; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:24:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h496O6m2016211; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:24:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h496O6VZ016210; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 23:24:06 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org, kan@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030509062406.GB16064@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030508205436.GF17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030508205436.GF17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Subject: Re: All gcc ports broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 06:24:11 -0000 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:54:36PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/gcc-3.1.1_20020909.log This appears to be a matter of Java 3.1.1 didn't support FreeBSD/sparc64, thus the packing breaks due to lack of java-related files. Considering that the Java 3.1.1 compiler isn't near as usable as the 3.3 one; we should just remove the Java compiler from this port. > The older ports should be marked ONLY_FOR_ARCHES since they do not > have support for most platforms. Can someone look into this? Done. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 23:28:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5989B37B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EC343F85; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:28:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5B766B9B; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4FD7FE1; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 23:28:05 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NMuMz9nt05w80d4+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: nntpcache broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 06:28:10 -0000 --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 08:22:19AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 03:19:00PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:39:45PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:51:23PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-5-latest/nntpcache-3.0.1= .log > > > >=20 > > > > Can someone please investigate and/or report to the developers? > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Compiles fine here on -current as of yesterday. > > > http://quad.zeist.de/nntpcache.log > >=20 > > Do you have malloc debugging enabled (the default setting)? > >=20 >=20 > Initially not but setting malloc.conf to 'AJ' or 'AZ' doesn't make > mmap_tests dump core here either. Odd. Can anyone else confirm the port compiles on a clean, up-to-date, default sparc installation? Since this breakage is new, it can only be something very recent, so an out-of-date installation or one with old installed files may not see the problem. Kris --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+u0p1Wry0BWjoQKURAgenAKCIRIYrTq/ppRA5ziia4WW1FS6a8wCfQyD8 Cm9ENPGVzSqnp8KzqVJHH2M= =P8yC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 00:49:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894C337B401 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 00:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp802.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp802.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC08743F85 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 00:49:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sewall@ix.netcom.com) Received: from adsl-63-198-181-47.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO ix.netcom.com) (sewall@pacbell.net@63.198.181.47 with plain) by smtp-sbc-v1.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2003 07:49:37 -0000 Message-ID: <3EBB6239.4513EC9E@ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 01:09:29 -0700 From: "Scott R. Sewall" Organization: Rosetta software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <3EBADC46.2080707@ix.netcom.com> <20030509062139.GA16064@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Installing on Ultra10 serial port X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 07:49:40 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 03:37:58PM -0700, Scott Sewall wrote: > > > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD onto an Ultra10. > > What's the default settings for the serial port? > > 9600-8N1 ok, got that part right. Connecting from a PC, do I use a null-modem or straight-through cable? and do I connect to serial port A or B? -- Scott From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 06:01:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A533C37B401; Fri, 9 May 2003 06:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iaces.com (horton.iaces.com [204.147.87.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F287B43F93; Fri, 9 May 2003 06:01:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from proot@iaces.com) Received: from iaces.com (ptroot.iaces.com [204.147.87.124]) by iaces.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h49D1MTG041811; Fri, 9 May 2003 08:01:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from proot@iaces.com) Message-ID: <3EBBA6A2.30403@iaces.com> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 08:01:22 -0500 From: Paul Root User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Scott R. Sewall" References: <3EBADC46.2080707@ix.netcom.com> <20030509062139.GA16064@dragon.nuxi.com> <3EBB6239.4513EC9E@ix.netcom.com> In-Reply-To: <3EBB6239.4513EC9E@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing on Ultra10 serial port X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 13:01:33 -0000 It's DTE to DTE so you need null modem. Port A. Sun's automatically set Port A to the console when it doesn't find a keyboard. Scott R. Sewall wrote: > > David O'Brien wrote: > > >>On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 03:37:58PM -0700, Scott Sewall wrote: >> >>>I'm trying to install FreeBSD onto an Ultra10. >>>What's the default settings for the serial port? >> >>9600-8N1 > > > ok, got that part right. > > Connecting from a PC, do I use a null-modem or straight-through cable? > > and do I connect to serial port A or B? > > -- Scott > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Paul T. Root E/Mail: proot@iaces.com 600 Stinson Blvd N.E., Fl 1S PAG: +1 (877) 693-7155 Minneapolis, MN 55413 WRK: +1 (612) 664-3385 FAX: +1 (612) 664-4779 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 12:53:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B4437B401 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 12:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lila.com (lila.com [66.92.251.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DC543F93 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 12:53:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dorsey@lila.com) Received: from lila.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lila.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h49J2Q901573 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 12:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 12:02:23 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Bill Dorsey To: sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) Subject: Cyrus IMAPD X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 19:53:45 -0000 Has anyone met with any success in getting Cyrus IMAPD working on a Sparc64 platform? I am trying to upgrade an older Sparc32 machine with an Ultrasparc. Cyrus IMAPD handles all my mail delivery. It seems to build fine, but after I start the master process, I am unable to contact the imap daemon on the localhost as recommended by the configure-testing.html file that comes with Cyrus. A look in the imap log file reveals the following: May 4 17:51:01 test master[41874]: about to exec /usr/local/cyrus/bin/imapd May 4 17:51:01 test service-imap[41874]: executed However, the imap daemon does not display the banner line as it does on my Sparc32 machine so it appears to be getting stuck somewhere. I assume this is likely a 64-bit issue? On the bright side, I'm getting a lot more stuff to work under FreeBSD/Sparc64 than I was under NetBSD/Sparc64. Kudos to the folks responsible for the porting effort! -- Bill Dorsey From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 13:13:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605E137B401; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B86A43FAF; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:13:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D8266B9B; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4A1791022; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 13:13:06 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <20030509201306.GA22910@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Marius Strobl cc: sparc64@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: nntpcache broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 20:13:08 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 09:53:22PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: >=20 > > Odd. Can anyone else confirm the port compiles on a clean, > > up-to-date, default sparc installation? Since this breakage is new, > > it can only be something very recent, so an out-of-date installation > > or one with old installed files may not see the problem. >=20 > Should there be a target "make cleancruft" to complement "make > installworld" that cleans out obsolete include files, libraries, > commands... -- or do it the Linux way and include the base system in > package management (which may introduce interesting bootstrapping > problems). Probably, but it's not nearly that simple. This has been discussed elsewhere a number of times. Kris --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+vAvSWry0BWjoQKURAvDjAJ92pRlzlxGBbP/u79PcrVKC+ewHTQCfcoN7 1LA9QaCr/SA86gYxGCOdYXc= =R7hw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 13:46:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E5C37B401; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF2F43FE3; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:46:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org (12-240-204-110.client.attbi.com[12.240.204.110]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with ESMTP id <2003050920465505100bv4kee>; Fri, 9 May 2003 20:46:55 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h49Kksrh011106; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:46:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h49KkrfI011105; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:46:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 13:46:53 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Eric Anholt Message-ID: <20030509204653.GA11053@intruder.bmah.org> References: <20030116072448.GA29468@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030116201728.GA279@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030408003332.GA60864@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030507221133.GA678@crow.dom2ip.de> <1052347524.1070.10.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1052347524.1070.10.camel@leguin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ cc: Thomas Moestl cc: Kris Kennaway cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: assembler error in XFree86 snapshot X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 20:46:56 -0000 --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 15:11, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > On Mon, 2003/04/07 at 17:33:32 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > > > This is a arguably a gcc bug. All (13-bit) immediate operands are > > > > sign-extended, even those to instructions which operate on unsigned > > > > values, so umul can handle a range of very small and a range of very > > > > large operands. gcc correctly recognizes that it can use an immedia= te > > > > here; however, it chooses to output it as an unsigned number and do= es > > > > not sign-extended it from 32 to 64 bit. > > > >=20 > > > > All sign extensions for instructions are made to the full 64 bit > > > > however (even if umul only happens to use 32 of those), so when the > > > > assembler checks whether a value is representable as an immediate, = it > > > > will check that the 64-bit sign extension of the immediate creates > > > > the desired value (in sparc64 mode), i.e. it doesn't ignore the upp= er > > > > 32 bits even if a particular instruction does not use them. > > > >=20 > > > > One solution is to generate negative literals for immediates if we > > > > mean them to be sign-extended (which gcc does already for some other > > > > instructions). The attached patch implements this, I'm not sure it > > > > uses the best possible way to do this though, and it also needs a b= it > > > > more testing. > > >=20 > > > *Ping* > > >=20 > > > Someone needs to take this up with the gcc developers so it can get f= ixed. > >=20 > > Sorry, I didn't have time to get this done for 5.2. The attached patch > > should work around the bug however; Eric, could you please add it to > > XFree86-4-libraries, until the problem is resolved in gcc or gas, so > > that there can be a package for the release? > >=20 > > Thanks, > > - Thomas >=20 > Done. Thanks for the patch. Does this patch fix the "gcc sparc64 problems" item on the 5.1 TODO list? (i.e. can I cross it off as completed?) http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html Thanks! Bruce. --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+vBO92MoxcVugUsMRApSCAJ96enmD51T5d0gql7Bb/ar54nZ44ACfbXBV mHm0/56I7frfEqN6aY6pL+4= =FI7O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 13:51:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3553237B401; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC0443F93; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:51:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECB766B9B; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52B339F5; Fri, 9 May 2003 13:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 13:51:54 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Bruce A. Mah" Message-ID: <20030509205154.GA23165@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030116072448.GA29468@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030116201728.GA279@crow.dom2ip.de> <20030408003332.GA60864@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030507221133.GA678@crow.dom2ip.de> <1052347524.1070.10.camel@leguin> <20030509204653.GA11053@intruder.bmah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030509204653.GA11053@intruder.bmah.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: Thomas Moestl cc: Eric Anholt cc: Kris Kennaway cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: assembler error in XFree86 snapshot X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 20:51:58 -0000 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 01:46:53PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > Done. Thanks for the patch. >=20 > Does this patch fix the "gcc sparc64 problems" item on the 5.1 TODO > list? (i.e. can I cross it off as completed?) >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html It claims to work around the problem (I haven't yet tested the patch on bento, but I trust it works). We won't have an actual gcc fix before 5.1, but it is claimed to be fixed in gcc 3.3. It might be appropriate to remove the text about XFree86 being broken and move the item to the errata (although we'd probably need a better characterization of the gcc bug). Kris --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+vBTqWry0BWjoQKURAujUAJ9WfdmasxZ6CgsoF4JomifktuZh0wCeOTEy lfgQ7GBycekwejPnCgQK9mE= =wT76 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 14:03:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF16537B401 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 14:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail15.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA6843F85 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 14:03:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 25643 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 21:03:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 9 May 2003 21:03:58 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx ([216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h49L3lp0013246; Fri, 9 May 2003 17:03:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 17:03:53 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Bill Dorsey cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Cyrus IMAPD X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 21:03:53 -0000 On 09-May-2003 Bill Dorsey wrote: > Has anyone met with any success in getting Cyrus IMAPD working on a > Sparc64 platform? I am trying to upgrade an older Sparc32 machine with > an Ultrasparc. Cyrus IMAPD handles all my mail delivery. > > It seems to build fine, but after I start the master process, I am > unable to contact the imap daemon on the localhost as recommended by > the configure-testing.html file that comes with Cyrus. > > A look in the imap log file reveals the following: > > May 4 17:51:01 test master[41874]: about to exec > /usr/local/cyrus/bin/imapd > May 4 17:51:01 test service-imap[41874]: executed > > However, the imap daemon does not display the banner line as it does on > my Sparc32 machine so it appears to be getting stuck somewhere. > > I assume this is likely a 64-bit issue? > > On the bright side, I'm getting a lot more stuff to work under > FreeBSD/Sparc64 than I was under NetBSD/Sparc64. Kudos to the folks > responsible for the porting effort! What are you using to test? imtest? Does 'imtest localhost' hang before generating any output? -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 06:08:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE8E37B401; Sat, 10 May 2003 06:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD2343FCB; Sat, 10 May 2003 06:08:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4AD8ec4005987; Sat, 10 May 2003 15:08:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4AD8Z3H005986; Sat, 10 May 2003 15:08:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 15:08:35 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <20030510150835.M427@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de on Fri, May 09, 2003 at 09:53:22PM +0200 cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: nntpcache broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:08:44 -0000 On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 09:53:22PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: > > > Odd. Can anyone else confirm the port compiles on a clean, > > up-to-date, default sparc installation? Since this breakage is new, > > it can only be something very recent, so an out-of-date installation > > or one with old installed files may not see the problem. > > Should there be a target "make cleancruft" to complement "make > installworld" that cleans out obsolete include files, libraries, > commands... -- or do it the Linux way and include the base system in > package management (which may introduce interesting bootstrapping > problems). > As for compiling nntpcache, I wipe out /usr/include, /usr/lib* (except libc, libgnuregexp, libm, libmd, libbz2 and ld-elf which are required for an installworld) and /usr/share with every upgrade. So there shouldn't be any old cruft that causes nntpcache to accidentally build on my box. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 09:57:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CF737B401 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 09:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from k6.locore.ca (k6.locore.ca [198.96.117.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113DB43FBD for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 09:57:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jake@k6.locore.ca) Received: from k6.locore.ca (localhost.locore.ca [127.0.0.1]) by k6.locore.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4AGwJU1005109; Sat, 10 May 2003 12:58:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jake@k6.locore.ca) Received: (from jake@localhost) by k6.locore.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4AGwIUd005108; Sat, 10 May 2003 12:58:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 12:58:18 -0400 From: Jake Burkholder To: Doug White Message-ID: <20030510165818.GA5077@locore.ca> References: <20030508164414.X44260@carver.gumbysoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030508164414.X44260@carver.gumbysoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: someone working on fas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 16:57:36 -0000 Apparently, On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 05:01:01PM -0700, Doug White said words to the effect of; > I'm sure you hear this all the time, but is someone actively working on a > driver for the fas SCSI controllers? If not, then I'll take a crack at it > -- I have an Ultra 1 200E, I just need the specs or something to steal > from. > > Hints? Scott Long is working on it. The existing amd(4) driver supports similar chips and he figured it was easier to write an sbus attachment and deal with any differences between different chipsets than to convert the netbsd esp driver to cam. I haven't heard any news recently, he may be interested in help or you taking it over :) Thanks, Jake From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 09:59:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7167E37B401 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 09:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from k6.locore.ca (k6.locore.ca [198.96.117.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A74F43F93 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 09:59:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jake@k6.locore.ca) Received: from k6.locore.ca (localhost.locore.ca [127.0.0.1]) by k6.locore.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4AH0VU1005126; Sat, 10 May 2003 13:00:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jake@k6.locore.ca) Received: (from jake@localhost) by k6.locore.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4AH0Vb1005125; Sat, 10 May 2003 13:00:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:00:31 -0400 From: Jake Burkholder To: Baby Peanut Message-ID: <20030510170031.GB5077@locore.ca> References: <20030508162444.92388.qmail@web41306.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030508162444.92388.qmail@web41306.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1-BETA on Ultra-2 with ISP panics X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 16:59:47 -0000 Apparently, On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:24:44AM -0700, Baby Peanut said words to the effect of; > But at least the ISP bug was fixed. Please send this to current@, it doesn't look immediately sparc64 or isp specific. Thanks, Jake From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 11:35:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EED37B401 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 11:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B14A43F75 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 11:35:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8540D72FD1; Sat, 10 May 2003 11:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822AA72FCC; Sat, 10 May 2003 11:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 11:35:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Jake Burkholder In-Reply-To: <20030510165818.GA5077@locore.ca> Message-ID: <20030510113503.I66758@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20030508164414.X44260@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20030510165818.GA5077@locore.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: someone working on fas? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 18:35:44 -0000 On Sat, 10 May 2003, Jake Burkholder wrote: > Apparently, On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 05:01:01PM -0700, > Doug White said words to the effect of; > > > I'm sure you hear this all the time, but is someone actively working on a > > driver for the fas SCSI controllers? If not, then I'll take a crack at it > > -- I have an Ultra 1 200E, I just need the specs or something to steal > > from. > > > > Hints? > > Scott Long is working on it. The existing amd(4) driver supports similar > chips and he figured it was easier to write an sbus attachment and deal > with any differences between different chipsets than to convert the netbsd > esp driver to cam. I haven't heard any news recently, he may be interested > in help or you taking it over :) amd seems like a wierd driver since its a symbios deriviative, but if I see scott I'll ping him. Thanks! -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 23:09:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C2D37B401; Sat, 10 May 2003 23:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lila.com (lila.com [66.92.251.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E421A43FB1; Sat, 10 May 2003 23:09:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dorsey@lila.com) Received: from lila.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lila.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h4B69B909066; Sat, 10 May 2003 23:09:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 23:09:08 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) To: John Baldwin From: Bill Dorsey In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <13AD31AA-8377-11D7-B3D5-000393B67A48@lila.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAPD X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 06:09:15 -0000 Hi John, test# imtest localhost C: C01 CAPABILITY At this point, imtest is hung. Also: test# telnet localhost imap Trying ::1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. Again, it hangs at this point. Here's the log from cyrus: May 10 23:03:35 test master[20705]: about to exec /usr/local/cyrus/bin/imapd May 10 23:03:35 test service-imap[20705]: executed [nothing more] -- Bill Dorsey On Friday, May 9, 2003, at 14:03 US/Pacific, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 09-May-2003 Bill Dorsey wrote: >> Has anyone met with any success in getting Cyrus IMAPD working on a >> Sparc64 platform? I am trying to upgrade an older Sparc32 machine >> with >> an Ultrasparc. Cyrus IMAPD handles all my mail delivery. >> >> It seems to build fine, but after I start the master process, I am >> unable to contact the imap daemon on the localhost as recommended by >> the configure-testing.html file that comes with Cyrus. >> >> A look in the imap log file reveals the following: >> >> May 4 17:51:01 test master[41874]: about to exec >> /usr/local/cyrus/bin/imapd >> May 4 17:51:01 test service-imap[41874]: executed >> >> However, the imap daemon does not display the banner line as it does >> on >> my Sparc32 machine so it appears to be getting stuck somewhere. >> >> I assume this is likely a 64-bit issue? >> >> On the bright side, I'm getting a lot more stuff to work under >> FreeBSD/Sparc64 than I was under NetBSD/Sparc64. Kudos to the folks >> responsible for the porting effort! > > What are you using to test? imtest? Does 'imtest localhost' hang > before generating any output? > > -- > > John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ > >