From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 2 2:10:47 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4B637B401 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 02:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from solfertje.student.utwente.nl (solfertje.student.utwente.nl [130.89.167.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACCE43E4A for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 02:10:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl) Received: from solfertje.student.utwente.nl (failways.internal [10.236.150.2]) by solfertje.student.utwente.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAC314A; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 11:12:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 11:10:59 +0100 (CET) From: Alban Hertroys Reply-To: Alban Hertroys Subject: Re: ata33 vs others? To: Eric Timme Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200301311856.59367.timothy@voidnet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20030202101245.1EAC314A@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 31 Jan, Eric Timme punched keys in this particular order: > After wrestling with an 80gb hd and an Abit BX6-R2 for an afternoon and being > pleasantly surprised that Abit's last bios release would allow my board to > detect and use an 80gb hd I came to the sad realization that the computer > only supported ata33. That shouldn't matter much if it is the only drive on the IDE channel. Modern harddrives still perform under 40MB/s last time I checked (the IBM 60GXP series could do 37.5MB/s), and that is at maximum. The ATA100 standard was necessery because two disks on a channel could in some cases press the required data throughput of the controller over 66MB/s (2x37.5=75), though I'm sure it maxes out quite a bit under 100MB/s. I don't know how much overhead data on an IDE channel has (like 'packet headers' or some equivalent) and we now have an ATA133 standard that would be kind of absurd with the above reasoning. Maybe someone can shine a light on this? -- Alban Hertroys http://solfertje.student.utwente.nl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This person has performed an illegal operation and will be shot down. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 2 3:58: 2 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF2137B409; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 03:57:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7CD43F43; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 03:57:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@freebsd.org) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h12Bvu4Z058895; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:57:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@freebsd.org) Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:57:56 +0100 Message-ID: <58894.1044187076@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: End-Of-Life announcement for M-Systems DiskOnChip driver ("fla"). MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary="----- =_aaaaaaaaaa" To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ------- =_aaaaaaaaaa To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: End-Of-Life announcement for M-Systems DiskOnChip driver ("fla"). From: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:57:56 +0100 Message-ID: <58894.1044187076@critter.freebsd.dk> This is _only_ about the driver for the DiskOnChip devices from M-Systems. This does not affect any other device. If you have never seen a /dev/fla0 mounted on your system, you don't need to read the rest. I realize that there are users of the DiskOnChip hardware out there now, but I seriously don't expect there to be any users once we get to FreeBSD 6.0 so I plant to remove the driver once the 5-stable branch is laid down. This means that the 5.x series of FreeBSD releases will be the last to have built in support for the Disk-On-Chip driver. The driver in the tree works with the M-systems devices I have to test with, but M-Systems have neither sent me the necessary software updates nor hardware samples of the latest generation of the DoC and I have received no emails from people who were stuck because of this. Combine this with the fact that the DoC is a CPU-poll technology where you busy-wait for the flash devices to do their thing, rather than get an interrupt when they are done, I think we can safely say that the DoC is well past its prime time. As far as I can tell, people use CompactFlash these days instead. Protests to: phk@freebsd.org Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ------- =_aaaaaaaaaa-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 2 12:20:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82BA37B405; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:20:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from lyceum.netmojo.ca (lyceum.pims.sfu.ca [142.58.49.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F18343F79; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:20:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brent@lyceum.netmojo.ca) Received: from lyceum.netmojo.ca (flowctrl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lyceum.netmojo.ca (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h12KKhxc014921; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:20:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brent@lyceum.netmojo.ca) Received: (from brent@localhost) by lyceum.netmojo.ca (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h12KKheZ014920; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:20:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:20:43 -0800 From: Brent Kearney To: Mike Meyer Cc: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem disappeared following 4.2 -> 4.7 upgrade Message-ID: <20030202202043.GA14875@kearneys.ca> Reply-To: brent@kearneys.ca References: <20030202185009.GA14514@kearneys.ca> <20030202185916.GA14615@kearneys.ca> <20030202191806.GA14696@kearneys.ca> <15933.30462.77008.33453@guru.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15933.30462.77008.33453@guru.mired.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-URL: http://brent.kearneys.ca Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:52:30PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <20030202191806.GA14696@kearneys.ca>, Brent Kearney typed: > > No /dev/ad5s1, etc., and `mount /dev/ad5s1 /home` produces only: > > > > mount: /dev/ad5s1: No such file or directory > > > > Do I need to make device nodes for the ad5s1 partition? I'm not sure how, > > if so. > > Yes, you need to make device nodes. Try: > > # cd /dev > # ./MAKEDEV ad5s1c > Or s1a, or whatever you were using. Thanks Mike; `/dev/MAKEDEV ad5` made all of the nodes, and I was able to mount /dev/ad5s1e, and relieve my panic ;). What if this system were an all-IDE system? I was planning to update one soon, and will no doubt run into this problem. The root filesystem device node will change names, and according to this thread: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2388792+2394647+/usr/local/www/db/text/2003/freebsd-questions/20030112.freebsd-questions even if I anticipate what the new name will be (how do I do that, anyways?), updating /etc/fstab before rebooting with the new binaries won't help. It doesn't look like anyone followed up on that thread, but maybe I'm using the wrong search criteria. The note in /usr/src/UPDATING on this new ata code is quite sparse, given what people may unexpectedly run into when updating on IDE systems. That should probably be fixed to include the requirement of doing not only `MAKEDEV all`, but also `MAKEDEV ` to create partition nodes, and whatever needs to be done for booting onto the newly named partitions, if the / is on one of them. Best regards, Brent > The reason ad0 turned into ad5 is that ata disk devices are now > numbered statically instead of dynamically. This is a good > thing. While it does mean that your drives move when you upgrade the > OS this one time, it also means that they won't move when you add a > drive to the system. > > -- > Mike Meyer http://www.mired.org/consulting.html > Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 2 13:51:59 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFB237B401 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 13:51:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx10.mail.ru (mx10.mail.ru [194.67.57.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1543343FBF for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 13:51:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ilya_best@mail.ru) Received: from [193.109.248.152] (helo=ilya_red70) by mx10.mail.ru with smtp (Exim SMTP.A) id 18fRHn-000HPl-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 00:04:20 +0300 From: ÈËÜß To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Õîòèòå ïîëó÷èòü WebMoney ïî÷òè áåñïëàòíî? X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Reply-To: ilya_red70@mail.ru Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 23:07:32 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ß çíàþ, êàê îáìàíóòü ñèñòåìó WebMoney. ß íå ïðåäëàãàþ âàì ïðîãðàììû, êîòîðûå ïåðåâîäÿò äåíüãè íà âàø êîøåëüåê. Èëè ñïèñêè êîøåëüêîâ, êîòîðûå âîçâðàùàþò âàøè äåíüãè â íåñêîëüêî ðàç áîëüøå. ß ïðåäëàãàþ Âàì äåéñòâèòåëüíî ðàáîòàþùèé ñïñîá äîáàâëåíèÿ äåíåã íà âàø êîøåëüåê. Åñëè âàì èíòåðåñíî, òîãäà ïèøèòå mailto:webmoneypochta@ukr.net?subject=WebMoney ïî÷òè áåñïëàòíî To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 2 14:24:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0EE37B401 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 14:24:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (user38.net339.fl.sprint-hsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C01343F43 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 14:24:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bv@wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost.wjv.com [127.0.0.1]) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h12MOcrC084035 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:24:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bv@wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h12MOb3X084034 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:24:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:24:37 -0500 From: Bill Vermillion To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: at33 vs others? Message-ID: <20030202222437.GA83950@wjv.com> Reply-To: bv@wjv.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park ReplyTo: bv@wjv.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.43 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 11:10:59 +0100 (CET) > From: Alban Hertroys > Subject: Re: ata33 vs others? > > On 31 Jan, Eric Timme punched keys in this particular order: > > After wrestling with an 80gb hd and an Abit BX6-R2 for an afternoon and being > > pleasantly surprised that Abit's last bios release would allow my board to > > detect and use an 80gb hd I came to the sad realization that the computer > > only supported ata33. > > That shouldn't matter much if it is the only drive on the IDE channel. > > Modern harddrives still perform under 40MB/s last time I checked (the > IBM 60GXP series could do 37.5MB/s), and that is at maximum. > > The ATA100 standard was necessery because two disks on a channel could > in some cases press the required data throughput of the controller > over 66MB/s (2x37.5=75), though I'm sure it maxes out quite a bit under > 100MB/s. > > I don't know how much overhead data on an IDE channel has (like 'packet > headers' or some equivalent) and we now have an ATA133 standard that > would be kind of absurd with the above reasoning. > Maybe someone can shine a light on this? > I just updated an iNTEL 1100R rack mount from an ATA33 [don't recall the drive] to a Promise 100/133 controller and a Maxtor 120GB 7200 RPM ATA133 I saw significant increase. I used the old iozone2 [in ports] as I've used it for years and it measure r/w performance through the file system. The old system, using a 200MB fiel for test showed 9,166,619 B/sec write and 9,422,339B/sec read. With the new combo on a fully fresh filesystem I used a 500MB file for test. I got 21,408,22B/sec write and 46,091,252B/sec write. Since this was so much faster I repeated the test with a 1GB file. That gave me this: 20,677,512B/sec write and 45,554,310Bsec read. I just compiiled 4.7-P3 [CPU is 650MHz] and came in about 55 minutes and the kernel compile took just about 9 minutes. The faster drive and controller make a significant perfomance difference. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 2 15:10:47 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774F937B401 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 15:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta01bw.bigpond.com (mta01bw.bigpond.com [139.134.6.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1317C43F75 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 15:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@burren.cx) Received: from ninox.burren.cx ([144.135.24.78]) by mta01bw.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta01bw Jul 16 2002 22:47:55) with SMTP id H9PF1P00.7CH for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:10:37 +1000 Received: from CPE-203-51-155-130.vic.bigpond.net.au ([203.51.155.130]) by bwmam04.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0n 29/9073179); 03 Feb 2003 09:10:37 Received: (qmail 51255 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2003 23:09:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO burren.cx) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2003 23:09:25 -0000 To: bv@wjv.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: at33 vs others? In-Reply-To: Message from Bill Vermillion of "Sun, 02 Feb 2003 17:24:37 CDT." <20030202222437.GA83950@wjv.com> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 10:09:25 +1100 Message-ID: <51253.1044227365@burren.cx> From: David Burren Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I just updated an iNTEL 1100R rack mount from an ATA33 [don't > recall the drive] to a Promise 100/133 controller and a Maxtor > 120GB 7200 RPM ATA133 I saw significant increase. Yes ATA133 can be faster as it removes one bottleneck, but the drive will be making a big difference too. The 7200 RPM of the Maxtor will be boosting the transfer rate, and the larger buffer, (possibly) different buffer management in the firmware, and (presumably) lower seek times of the disk will all be contributing. The position of the filesystem partition on the drive and the fresh filesystem will also affect the result. Your numbers are not a true indication of the advantages of ATA133. Try connecting the drive with an ATA33 cable to drop the bus speed back and do your test again. That would be a better comparison. But then you might not care that much. Your system is significantly faster than it was, and that's probably the bottom line for most people. :-) __ David B To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 2 18:32:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD99E37B401 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D27F43F79 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:32:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10698A1822 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 22:32:39 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 22:32:39 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ffs_update panic with latest kernel ... softupdates problem? Message-ID: <20030202222938.D16840@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just upgraded my world/kernel today, and it panic'd within 12hrs with: (kgdb) where #0 0xc7c1a256 in ?? () #1 0xc014e46c in boot (howto=256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:223 #2 0xc014eb91 in panic (fmt=0xc022fc99 "%s") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc01ffb29 in trap_fatal (frame=0xea667e94, eva=66) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 #4 0xc01ff795 in trap_pfault (frame=0xea667e94, usermode=0, eva=66) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 #5 0xc01ff2ef in trap (frame={tf_fs = -362414056, tf_es = -1072234480, tf_ds = -737476592, tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -879852544, tf_ebp = -362381588, tf_isp = -362381632, tf_ebx = -946393088, tf_edx = -1, tf_ecx = -296658752, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1071952598, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66118, tf_esp = 0, tf_ss = -296658752}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 #6 0xc01b4d2a in ffs_update (vp=0xee5158c0, waitfor=0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_inode.c:105 #7 0xc01bd267 in ffs_sync (mp=0xc7958600, waitfor=3, cred=0xc62fba00, p=0xe7c9a780) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1025 #8 0xc017e8dc in sync_fsync (ap=0xea667f7c) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2972 #9 0xc017cbb3 in sched_sync () at vnode_if.h:558 (kgdb) up 5 #5 0xc01ff2ef in trap (frame={tf_fs = -362414056, tf_es = -1072234480, tf_ds = -737476592, tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -879852544, tf_ebp = -362381588, tf_isp = -362381632, tf_ebx = -946393088, tf_edx = -1, tf_ecx = -296658752, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1071952598, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66118, tf_esp = 0, tf_ss = -296658752}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 466 (void) trap_pfault(&frame, FALSE, eva); (kgdb) frame frame->tf_ebp frame->tf_eip #0 0xc01b4d2a in ffs_update (vp=0xee5158c0, waitfor=0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_inode.c:105 105 if (DOINGSOFTDEP(vp)) (kgdb) list 100 (int)fs->fs_bsize, NOCRED, &bp); 101 if (error) { 102 brelse(bp); 103 return (error); 104 } 105 if (DOINGSOFTDEP(vp)) 106 softdep_update_inodeblock(ip, bp, waitfor); 107 else if (ip->i_effnlink != ip->i_nlink) 108 panic("ffs_update: bad link cnt"); 109 *((struct dinode *)bp->b_data + To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 2 21:40:36 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05AC37B401; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 21:40:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from jlonline.com (pip13.ptt.js.cn [61.155.13.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 343CB43F85; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 21:40:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from xzht@public.xz.js.cn) Received: from wrh([61.177.212.133]) by js.cn(AIMC 2.9.5.2) with SMTP id jm193e3e4f0e; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 13:38:11 +0800 Reply-To: xzht@163.com From: ÄäÃû <> To: ÍøÂçÊÓƵ»áÒé¡¢ÍøÂçÔ¶³Ì½ÌѧºÍ¼à¿Øϵͳ <> Subject: ³¬Ò»Á÷ÍøÂçÊÓƵ»áÒé¡¢Ãâ·Ñµç»°¡¢Ô¶³Ì½Ìѧר¼Ò»áÕïϵͳ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312_CHARSET" Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:38:01 +0800 Message-Id: <20030203054029.343CB43F85@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ³¬Ò»Á÷ÍøÂçÊÓƵ»áÒé¡¢Ãâ·Ñµç»°¡¢Ô¶³Ì½Ìѧר¼Ò»áÕïϵͳ ±¾¹«Ë¾×îвúÆ·:ÍøÂçÊÓƵ»áÒéÊÓƵ·þÎñÆ÷---¹ã·ºÓÃÓÚ¸ßÇåÎú¶È¾ÖÓò»ò¹ãÓòÊÓƵ»áÒé¡¢ÍøÂç¼à¿Ø¡¢Ó׶ùÔ°¾´ÀÏÔººÍÒ½Ôº²¡·¿¼ÒÈËÒìµØÔ¶³Ì¼à»¤¡¢×¨¼ÒÔ¶³ÌÒ½ÁÆ»áÕïºÍ½Ìѧ¡¢ÍøÂçÔ¶³Ì½ÌÊÒÒÔ¼°ÎÞ»°·Ñ¿ÉÊÓ»¯¿Í»§·þÎñϵͳ,ÍøÉÏ·ç¾°Çø,¾ÆµêʵʱÊÓƵչʾ¡¢µçÊÓ½ÚÄ¿ÍøÉÏʵʱת²¥¡¢´óÐÍÕ¹»áÏÖ³¡ÍøÂçÖ±²¥µÈ,ÍøÉÏ´«ÊäЧ¹û¾ÓÄ¿Ç°¹úÄÚÍâÁìÏÈˮƽ£¬¼Û¸ñ½öÓнø¿Úͬµµ´Î²úÆ·1/10¡£ »¶Ó­ÍøÉϹۿ´ÑÝʾЧ¹û:www.webht.com ÑÝʾ»·¾³¼°ÊÔÓ÷½·¨£º ±¾¹«Ë¾ÊÓƵ»áÒé·þÎñÆ÷ÿÌì24СʱÁ¬Ðø¿ª»ú£¬ÈôÓÐÐËȤÇëÔÚ±¾¹«Ë¾ÍøÕ¾ÏÂÔØ×îаæÂÌÉ«¿Í»§¶ËÈí¼þ,Ö±½Óµã»÷Ö´ÐкóÊäÈë·þÎñÆ÷ºÅ3300002£¬Óû§ÃûºÍÃÜÂë¾ùΪ¡°1234¡±£¬°´È·¶¨ºóÉÔµÈƬ¿Ì¼´¿ÉÁ¬Í¨ÊÓƵ»áÒéϵͳ¿´µ½ÑÝʾÏÖ³¡Í¼Ïó£¬ÔÚ´Ë´¦ÎÒÃÇ¿ÉÓû°Í²½øÐÐÊÓƵ»áÒéÓïÒô½»Ì¸£¬Ç×ÉíÌåÑé×îÐÂIT³É¹û£¬»¶Ó­ÓëÈκιúÍâ²úÆ·×÷Ò»¸ö±È½Ï£¬Äú»á·¢ÏÖÖйúµÄÔÂÁÁ±ÈÍâ¹úµÄÔÂÁÁ»¹ÒªÔ²¡£ Ó¦ÓÃÖ®Ò» ------ ÍøÂçÊÓƵԶ³Ì½ÌѧºÍר¼ÒÔ¶³Ì»áÕïϵͳ£º ÃûУÃûʦ½²¿Î¡¢¸ß¼¶½ÌÊÚ½²Ñ§¡¢Ò½Ñ§ÊÖÊõȨÍþµÄÊÖÊõ¶¼¿ÉʹÓñ¾ÏµÍ³Í¨¹ýÍøÂçÏòÌض¨Óû§¿ª·Å£¬»ñÓÐÃÜÂëµÄ½ÌÊÒ»ò¸öÈ˿ɵǽϵͳ²Î¼Óѧϰ¡£Ò»Ì×·þÎñÆ÷¿É¹©10---100ÒÔÉÏÓû§Í¬Ê±µÇ½£¬Ö»Òª·þÎñÆ÷¶Ë´ø¿í×ã¹»£¨500K X Óû§ÊýÁ¿£©£¬Óû§¶Ë300-500K´ø¿íÎÞ·ÓÉÑÓ³Ù£¬¿É×öµ½ÊÓÒôƵ»ù±¾Í¬²½£¬Ë«¹¤¶Ô½²¡£ ר¼ÒÔ¶³Ì»áÕ¡ª¡ªÀûÓÃÊÓѶҵÎñʵÏÖÖÐÐÄÒ½ÔºÓë»ù²ãÒ½Ôº¾ÍÒÉÄѲ¡Ö¢½øÐлáÕï¡¢Ö¸µ¼ÖÎÁÆÓ뻤Àí¡¢¶Ô»ù²ãÒ½ÎñÈËÔ±µÄҽѧÅàѵµÈµÈ¡£¸ßÖÊÁ¿µÄÊÓѶҵÎñʹҽÉú¡¢»¤Ê¿ÔÚ²»Í¬µØ·½Í¬Ê±Ð­Í¬¹¤×÷³ÉΪ¿ÉÄÜ¡£Ô¶³ÌÒ½ÁƶÔÓÚһЩÖÐСҽԺÓÐ×ÅÖØÒªµÄÒâÒ壬¿ÉÒԵõ½´óÒ½ÔºµÄҽѧר¼ÒµÄ×ÉѯºÍ»áÕï¡£ Ó¦ÓÃÖ®Ò» ------ ÎÞ»°·Ñ¿ÉÊÓ»¯¿Í»§·þÎñϵͳ£º ×ܹ«Ë¾Ö»Ð谲װһ̨ÊÓƵ·þÎñÆ÷¡¢¼¸Ö»ÉãÏñ»ú£¬Ô¶³ÌµÄ¸÷µØÁ¬Ëøµê·Ö¹«Ë¾Ö»ÐèʹÓÃÃâ·ÑµÄ¿Í»§¶ËÈí¼þͨ¹ýµçÄÔÉÏÍø¾Í¿Éͨ¹ýÍøÂçÓë×ܲ¿¶Ô»°£¬Í¬Ê±¿´µ½×ܲ¿¸ßÇåÎúͼÏ󡣿ÉÓÃÓÚ×ܲ¿¶ÔÏÂÊôµ¥Î»ÕÙ¿ªÊÓƵ»áÒé¡¢ÏÂÊôºô½Ð×ܲ¿½øÐÐÒµÎñÁªÏµ»ò×ܲ¿Ð²úÆ·¶Ô¹úÄÚÍâÔ¶¶Ë¿Í»§½øÐÐÑÝʾ¡¢ÅàѵºÍµç×Ó°×°åÎÄ×Ö¹µÍ¨£¬ÕâÒ»Ìصã¾ÍʹµÃ±¾ÏµÍ³¿ÉÈ¡´ú´óÐÍÆóÒµ¼¯ÍÅÄ¿Ç°°º¹óµÄ800µç»°¿Í»§·þÎñϵͳ¶øͨ¹ýÁ®¼ÛµÄÍøÂ緽ʽ¿ªÕ¹Óû§·þÎñ,ʹÓû§Ö±½Ó¿´µ½²úƷʵÎï´ïµ½×îºÃµÄÐû´«·þÎñ×÷Ó㬲¢ÇÒË«·½¶¼²»»á²úÉúÈκλ°·Ñ¡£ ÆäËü²úÆ·£º 1¡¢ÊÓƵ˫½ÊÏßÊÕ·¢Æ÷--Á®¼ÛµÄ¸ßÐÔÄÜÔ¶¾àÀë¼à¿Ø´«ÊäÉ豸,¾àÀë¿É´ï1-3ǧÃס£ 2¡¢LEDµç×ÓÏÔʾÆÁ£¬¼à¿Ø±¨¾¯×¨ÓÃÏÔʾÌõÆÁ£»3¡¢È«ÖÐÎľØÕóÍòÄÜÇл»¼à¿Ø±¨¾¯Ö÷»ú 4¡¢ÍøÂçÊÓƵ»áÒéϵͳ 5¡¢ÏúÊÛ±£°²¼à¿Ø¡¢Â¥Óî¶Ô½²É豸£¬³Ð½Ó±£°²¼à¿ØºÍУ԰ÍøÂ繤³Ì¡£7¡¢IC¿¨³ö×â³µ¼Æ¼ÛÆ÷ºÍ¹«ÎñÆû³µ¹ÜÀí»ú£»8¡¢²ÊÉ«¡¢ºÚ°×ÉãÏó»ú£¬Ë®ÏÂÉãÏó»ú,ϵÁкìÍâµÆ¡¢Æû³µÒ¹ÊÓÒÇ¡¢ÏµÁÐÎÞÏßÓ°ÒôÊÕ·¢Æ÷¡¢¹â¶Ë»ú¡¢ÊÓƵ¹²À´«ÊäµÈÉ豸. ±¾ÏµÍ³Ìص㣺 ÔÚͬһ¸öÍøÂç´ø¿í»·¾³ÏÂͼÏóºÍÓïÒôÖÊÁ¿¿É³¬¹ýÄ¿Ç°ËùÓеĹúÄÚÍâ²úÆ·£¬±¾ÏµÍ³ÊµÏÖ¸ßËÙ¸ßЧÂʵÄÈí¼þѹËõ¼¼Êõ£¬Ê¹ÊµÊ±Ñ¹Ëõ´«ÊäµÄͼÏóΪ756X576ÏóËØ£¬¶ø·ÇÏóËصķŴ󣬹ÊͼÏóÇåÎú¶È¸ß£¬Ê¹ÓÃÊó±êµã»÷»­Ãæ¿É¸´Ô­·Å´óΪÂúÆÁÏÔʾ£¬Ê¹ÓôóÆÁÄ»²Êµç»òͶӰÏÔʾÂúÆÁͼÏó»áÓÐÒâÏë²»µ½µÄ¸ßÇåÎú¶ÈЧ¹û¡£ ×îÐÂÏûÏ¢£º×¨Îª±¾ÏµÍ³ÅäÓõÄMCUÒµÒÑ¿ª·¢ÊÔÑé³É¹¦£¬ÒÑͨ¹ý16¡¢32ºÍ64ºÍ128 Óû§µÄ´óϵͳ²âÊÔ£¬×ª·¢µÄͼÏóÇåÎúÎȶ¨£¬¶ą̀MCU¼¶Á¬ºó¿É¹¹³É¸ü´óϵͳ£¬Ïêϸ×éÍø·½°´Ç뺯µçÁªÏµ¡£ ÐìÖÝ»ªÍ³µçÄÔÉ豸ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ ÐìÖÝÊÐÇàÄê·288ºÅËÄÂ¥ TEL£º0516-3738506 2682031 FAX£º0516-3752314 ÁªÏµÈË£ºÍõÈ𺣠ÍøÖ·£ºwww.webht.com ÓÊÏ䣺xzhtgs@163.com »¶Ó­¹âÁÙÍøÉÏÓªÏúÈí¼þ³¬ÊÐ http://www.sesoft.findhere.org ±¾ÓʼþÓ󬼶¹ã¸æÈí¼þ·¢ËÍ http://www.sesoft.findhere.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 1: 0:28 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F12B37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 01:00:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from eris.jules.de (eris.jules.de [80.190.100.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C696C43F79 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 01:00:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jsi@jules.de) Received: by eris.jules.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B4B3077A5C; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:00:17 +0100 (CET) From: "Jan Siml" Subject: SiS-Patch inside CVS To: "Luoqi Chen" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Originating-IP: 212.82.239.104 X-Mailer: Webmin 0.980 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1044262817" Message-Id: <20030203090017.B4B3077A5C@eris.jules.de> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:00:17 +0100 (CET) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1044262817 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Luogi! I doubt, if your patch* is already integrated into the code, that is delivered via CVS. The problem is the following. I patched a fresh installed FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE with your patchfile. The onbord nic works fine. But what if I fetch sources via CVS? Could i make an build-/installkernel without fear that the nic (SiS961/961B/962) won't work after this step? * http://people.freebsd.org/~luoqi/sis.diff Regards Jan P.S. Please CC me, as I'm not subscribed to the freebsd-stable mailing list. --bound1044262817-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 1:26:12 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC1837B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 01:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from swissgeeks.com (adsl-212-101-16-119.solnet.ch [212.101.16.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FDE243FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 01:26:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pbrossin@swissgeeks.com) Received: (qmail 20564 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 09:26:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by server.swissgeeks.com (127.0.0.1) with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2003 09:26:02 -0000 Received: from 195.49.31.34 ( [195.49.31.34]) as user pbrossin@localhost by www.swissgeeks.com with HTTP; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:26:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1044264361.3e3e35a91aeb8@www.swissgeeks.com> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:26:01 +0100 From: Pierrick Brossin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Cirrus - Which driver ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 X-Originating-IP: 195.49.31.34 X-Sent-Via: Mitel Networks SME Server Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I have a CL-GD5446 (Cirrus) Graphic Card and was wondering which driver I should use! First I tried the cirrus driver but the screen is not OK. I use WindowMaker and it appears two times on the screen. I've tried to modify VertSync and HorizRefresh with no success. I also tried to insert a Modeline. I surfed the net and found that XFree recommends to use the SVGA driver for Cirrus Cards.. but svga_drv.o is not in the list of drivers in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ Any idea what I should do ? Thanx -- Pierrick Brossin IT Swiss - QUARK Media House 6a Puits Godet, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland Tel Prof: +41-327201423 Mobile Priv: +41-794137145 Mail Prof: pbrossin@quark.ch Mail Priv: admin@swissgeeks.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 4:40:11 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6805537B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 04:40:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3338643F93 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 04:40:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h13CdphI054657 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 07:39:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: (from alane@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h13Cdpo9054656 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 07:39:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from alane) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 07:39:51 -0500 From: AlanE To: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: No terminfo in system ncurses Message-ID: <20030203123942.GA54636@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Reply-To: alane@geeksrus.net Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Every program expands until it can send mail. Except Exchange Server. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Why is there no full terminfo db in the system ncurses? You have to install the port in order to get it. Seems wrong to me. -- AlanE (Alan Eldridge) Unix/C(++) IT Pro for 20 yrs, likes fixing weird distributed systems bugs. KDE, KDE-FreeBSD Teams (http://www.kde.org, http://freebsd.kde.org/) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 5:26:27 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A1C37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 05:26:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from swissgeeks.com (adsl-212-101-16-119.solnet.ch [212.101.16.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 903A143F75 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 05:26:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pbrossin@swissgeeks.com) Received: (qmail 417 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 13:26:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by server.swissgeeks.com (127.0.0.1) with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2003 13:26:17 -0000 Received: from 195.49.31.34 ( [195.49.31.34]) as user pbrossin@localhost by www.swissgeeks.com with HTTP; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:26:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1044278776.3e3e6df8e7066@www.swissgeeks.com> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:26:16 +0100 From: Pierrick Brossin To: Dave Uhring Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cirrus - Which driver ? References: <1044264361.3e3e35a91aeb8@www.swissgeeks.com> <200302030723.48395.duhring@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <200302030723.48395.duhring@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 X-Originating-IP: 195.49.31.34 X-Sent-Via: Mitel Networks SME Server Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Dave Uhring : > Executing, as root, XFree86 -configure should provide you with an > XF86Config.new file with the proper driver declared. Nop it creates a file with VGA driver :( -- Pierrick Brossin IT Swiss - QUARK Media House 6a Puits Godet, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland Tel Prof: +41-327201423 Mobile Priv: +41-794137145 Mail Prof: pbrossin@quark.ch Mail Priv: admin@swissgeeks.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 6:20:56 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FE937B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 06:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from MX1.estpak.ee (mta2.mail.neti.ee [194.126.101.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3395C43E4A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 06:20:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from kevad.internal (80-235-34-97-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.34.97]) by MX1.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBA688881; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:19:33 +0200 (EET) Received: from kevad.internal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kevad.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h13EKh94003374; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:20:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo@kevad.internal) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by kevad.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h13EKckj003373; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:20:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:20:37 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: AlanE Cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: No terminfo in system ncurses Message-ID: <20030203142037.GA3251@kevad.internal> Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee References: <20030203123942.GA54636@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030203123942.GA54636@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i-ja.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:39:51AM -0500, AlanE wrote: > Why is there no full terminfo db in the system ncurses? You have to install > the port in order to get it. Seems wrong to me. It's stripped out for historical reasons I guess. BSD systems have used to use termcap traditionally, but you probably know it already. So the question is why the history forces us to termcap, so I have to install /usr/share/misc/terminfo by hand.. Good ground for new (and at the same time old) holy war, isn't it :-/ -- Vallo Kallaste kalts@estpak.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 7:20: 1 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F0D37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 07:19:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw.servicefactory.se (mailgw.servicefactory.se [192.71.33.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E6B43F75 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 07:19:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonas@servicefactory.se) Received: from ark.servicefactory.se (ark.servicefactory.se [192.71.33.5]) by mailgw.servicefactory.se (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h13FJt300824 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:19:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from servicefactory.se (ark.servicefactory.se [192.71.33.5]) by ark.servicefactory.se (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h13FJs026863 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:19:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3E3E8896.10003@servicefactory.se> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:19:50 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jonas_B=FClow?= Organization: Service Factory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20030120 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: libc_r seems to be broken in 4.7-STABLE as of Jan 27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, There seems to be a problem in libc_r causing processes to hang (spinning) during startup of the process. It happens when the box is very busy. I got the back trace below using gcore on such a spinning process. The process consumed like 70% CPU. Has this been seen before? What more can I do to help solve the problem? The is a diskless box without swap. It's likely it went out of memory. (gdb) bt #0 0x280c5660 in _thread_sig_handle_pending () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #1 0x280c50eb in _thread_sig_handler () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #2 0xbfbfffac in ?? () #3 0x281000f8 in _thread_leave_cancellation_point () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #4 0x28100445 in _thread_leave_cancellation_point () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #5 0x28100b5d in malloc () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #6 0x280cbbd4 in _thread_init () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #7 0x2810157c in _thread_init_invoker::_thread_init_invoker () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #8 0x281015b5 in _thread_init_invoker::_thread_init_invoker () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #9 0x281015de in _thread_init_invoker::_thread_init_invoker () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #10 0x2810160c in _thread_init_invoker::_thread_init_invoker () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #11 0x28088caa in _init () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #12 0x2804f978 in _rtld () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /jonas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 9: 8:27 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA6637B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from eurus.primus.ca (mail.tor.primus.ca [216.254.136.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF2243E4A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:08:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from 937863@primus.ca) Received: from dialin-133-249.hamilton.primus.ca ([209.90.133.249] helo=BirdOfPrey) by eurus.primus.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 18fk4o-00020a-0A; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 12:08:12 -0500 From: "Allan Jude" <937863@primus.ca> To: "'Marc G. Fournier'" Cc: Subject: RE: ffs_update panic with latest kernel ... softupdates problem? Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:08:00 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20030202222938.D16840@hub.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Disposition-Notification-To: "Allan Jude" <937863@primus.ca> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I also got a fss_update panic after updating my kernel/world -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 9:33 PM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ffs_update panic with latest kernel ... softupdates problem? Just upgraded my world/kernel today, and it panic'd within 12hrs with: (kgdb) where #0 0xc7c1a256 in ?? () #1 0xc014e46c in boot (howto=256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:223 #2 0xc014eb91 in panic (fmt=0xc022fc99 "%s") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc01ffb29 in trap_fatal (frame=0xea667e94, eva=66) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 #4 0xc01ff795 in trap_pfault (frame=0xea667e94, usermode=0, eva=66) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 #5 0xc01ff2ef in trap (frame={tf_fs = -362414056, tf_es = -1072234480, tf_ds = -737476592, tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -879852544, tf_ebp = -362381588, tf_isp = -362381632, tf_ebx = -946393088, tf_edx = -1, tf_ecx = -296658752, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1071952598, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66118, tf_esp = 0, tf_ss = -296658752}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 #6 0xc01b4d2a in ffs_update (vp=0xee5158c0, waitfor=0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_inode.c:105 #7 0xc01bd267 in ffs_sync (mp=0xc7958600, waitfor=3, cred=0xc62fba00, p=0xe7c9a780) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1025 #8 0xc017e8dc in sync_fsync (ap=0xea667f7c) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2972 #9 0xc017cbb3 in sched_sync () at vnode_if.h:558 (kgdb) up 5 #5 0xc01ff2ef in trap (frame={tf_fs = -362414056, tf_es = -1072234480, tf_ds = -737476592, tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = -879852544, tf_ebp = -362381588, tf_isp = -362381632, tf_ebx = -946393088, tf_edx = -1, tf_ecx = -296658752, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1071952598, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66118, tf_esp = 0, tf_ss = -296658752}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 466 (void) trap_pfault(&frame, FALSE, eva); (kgdb) frame frame->tf_ebp frame->tf_eip #0 0xc01b4d2a in ffs_update (vp=0xee5158c0, waitfor=0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_inode.c:105 105 if (DOINGSOFTDEP(vp)) (kgdb) list 100 (int)fs->fs_bsize, NOCRED, &bp); 101 if (error) { 102 brelse(bp); 103 return (error); 104 } 105 if (DOINGSOFTDEP(vp)) 106 softdep_update_inodeblock(ip, bp, waitfor); 107 else if (ip->i_effnlink != ip->i_nlink) 108 panic("ffs_update: bad link cnt"); 109 *((struct dinode *)bp->b_data + To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 9:49: 1 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EA837B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:49:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7585443FA7 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:48:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 18fkiD-0003nJ-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 12:48:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:48:53 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ata problems Message-ID: <20030203174853.GA12779@pir.net> Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Updating to -STABLE as of yesterday morning the cdrom combo drive in my laptop is not longer recognised. ata1-master: ATA identify retries exceeded ad0: 38154MB [77520/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a If I use atacontrol to detatch and attach ata1 it appears; acd0: CD-RW at ata1-master UDMA33 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present (I'm using atapicam). P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 10:58:18 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80FC37B405 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:58:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from zhadum.dnsalias.net (CPE-203-51-9-107.nsw.bigpond.net.au [203.51.9.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4BD43F9B for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:58:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sigemt@yahoo.com.au) Received: from psi.starfleet.org.au (psi.starfleet.org.au [172.16.0.3]) by arthur.starfleet.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1200941E; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 05:58:10 +1100 (EST) Received: by psi.starfleet.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18F6E436; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 05:57:41 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 05:57:40 +1100 From: Rudolph Pereira To: Mike Silbersack Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Gert-Jan Vons , Greg Lewis , Thomas Nystrom Subject: Re: Via Rhine owners, please test! Message-ID: <20030203185740.GI266@starfleet.org.au> References: <20030131201821.A5899-200000@patrocles.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030131201821.A5899-200000@patrocles.silby.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:59:28PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > At the request of Thomas Nystrom, I have now committed his patches to fix > the hanging problems of some rhine chipsets and his fixes to allow 6105 > (Rhine III) chips to work properly to -current. Naturally, I'm going to > wait at least a week before MFCing this change to 4-stable. In the > meantime, I'd like to request those who have had problems with Via Rhine > cards (either hangs, or unsupported 6105 cards) to try out this patch and > tell me how it works out. This patch contains all of the changes > described above, and should apply cleanly to any relatively recent > 4.7-stable machine. This works fine for me. I have, according to pciconf, a "VT6102 Rhine II" card, though it is an integrated one, and different enough to normal 6102 cards that it wasn't working before. Thanks for your great work Thomas/Mike. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 11:22:37 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7648937B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:22:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0028243F85 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:22:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 808E55372; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:22:34 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: HEADS UP: OpenSSH 3.5p1 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 20:22:33 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've upgraded OpenSSH in -STABLE to 3.5p1. Please report any breakage directly to me. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 11:45:30 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6369F37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:45:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6E243F75 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:45:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182]) by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h13Jj5BH000447; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:45:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: net2.dinoex.sub.org: Host dinoex@net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182] claimed to be net2.dinoex.sub.org Received: from gate.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@localhost) by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with BSMTP id h13Jj4wo000433; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:45:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) To: silby@silby.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Organization: privat Subject: Re: Via Rhine owners, please test! Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 20:39:07 +0100 X-Mailer: Dinoex 1.79 References: <20030131201821.A5899-200000@patrocles.silby.com> <20030131201821.A5899-200000@patrocles.silby.com> <20030203185740.GI266@starfleet.org.au> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT gate.dinoex.sub.org [UNIX/Connect 0.94] X-Accept-Language: de,en X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 16 EC 0A D3 3A 4F 28 8A 8A 47 93 F1 CF 2F 12 X-Noad: Please don't send me ad's by mail. I'm bored by this type of mail. X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2001 by Dirk Meyer -- All rights reserved. X-Note: sending SPAM is a violation of both german and US law and will at least trigger a complaint at your provider's postmaster. X-PGP-Key-Avail: mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net Subject:GET 0x331CDA5D X-No-Archive: yes X-ZC-VIA: 20030203000000W+1@dinoex.sub.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:59:28PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > At the request of Thomas Nystrom, I have now committed his patches to fix > the hanging problems of some rhine chipsets and his fixes to allow 6105 > (Rhine III) chips to work properly to -current. Naturally, I'm going to > wait at least a week before MFCing this change to 4-stable. In the > meantime, I'd like to request those who have had problems with Via Rhine > cards (either hangs, or unsupported 6105 cards) to try out this patch and > tell me how it works out. This patch contains all of the changes > described above, and should apply cleanly to any relatively recent > 4.7-stable machine. so far my problems seem to vanished in the last 2 days: Feb 1 18:38:28 ceres /kernel: vr0: watchdog timeout Feb 1 18:38:28 ceres /kernel: vr0: reset never completed! Feb 1 18:38:28 ceres /kernel: vr0: reset never completed! Feb 1 21:54:43 ceres /kernel: vr0: port 0xb800-0xb8ff mem 0xdd800000-0xdd8000ff irq 12 at device 10.0 on pci0 Feb 1 21:54:43 ceres /kernel: vr0: Ethernet address: 00:50:ba:eb:xx:xx Feb 1 21:54:43 ceres /kernel: miibus0: on vr0 vr0@pci0:10:0: class=0x020000 card=0x14011186 chip=0x30651106 rev=0x42 hdr=0x00 kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 11:48:30 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DD537B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44DE43FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:48:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ryan@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1079) id B5A37AE160; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:48:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:48:28 -0800 From: Ryan Dooley To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... Message-ID: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hey All, I'm looking for recommendations on the newfs options for a 1.0TB file system for say /home (it's a fileserver for 52000+ accounts that range from having 4k to 40GB in their directories.) When I initally created the file system, the options I set are: block size of 65536 and a fragsize of 8192. This has worked out for me in the past but now that the fs is more than 50% in use, the fsck's (it's a -STABLE system) are taking about an hour to complete. In a previous thread somebody recommended that I tweak the inodes when I have the time to rebuild the filesystem (I might have that opportunity soon). Currently, about 20% of the inodes (6141123/25124155 - used/free) are in use. Any recommendations? Thanks in advance, Cheers, Ryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 12: 5:38 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462B737B405 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:05:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F19243FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:05:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id C9B145372; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:05:33 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Ryan Dooley Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 21:05:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> (Ryan Dooley's message of "Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:48:28 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ryan Dooley writes: > When I initally created the file system, the options I set are: block size of > 65536 and a fragsize of 8192. How many cylinder groups? > This has worked out for me in the past but now that the fs is more than 50% > in use, the fsck's (it's a -STABLE system) are taking about an hour to complete. The question is, why does it need fsck'ing in the first place? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 12:29:46 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7885637B405 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:29:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net [24.53.161.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2714B43F75 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:29:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from potentialtech.com ([172.16.0.95]) by pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h13KUsT5071979; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:30:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Message-ID: <3E3ED0D4.6070601@potentialtech.com> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:28:04 -0500 From: Bill Moran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20021127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Dooley Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ryan Dooley wrote: > Hey All, > > I'm looking for recommendations on the newfs options for a 1.0TB file system > for say /home (it's a fileserver for 52000+ accounts that range from having > 4k to 40GB in their directories.) > > When I initally created the file system, the options I set are: block size of > 65536 and a fragsize of 8192. > > This has worked out for me in the past but now that the fs is more than 50% > in use, the fsck's (it's a -STABLE system) are taking about an hour to complete. I'd consider fixing the situation thats causing it to need fscked before doing anything else! > In a previous thread somebody recommended that I tweak the inodes when I have > the time to rebuild the filesystem (I might have that opportunity soon). > > Currently, about 20% of the inodes (6141123/25124155 - used/free) are in use. Sounds like you have enough users to have a pretty good idea of the average bytes per file. Use -i to specify that when you newfs. Don't overdo it! It's pretty frustrating to have 400G left on the drive an no inodes left to create any new files, but if you've got 50% of the space full and only 20% of the inodes, you can definately adjust this some. There's also -g and -h options. I'm not sure what effect these have, however. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 12:45:31 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B2937B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:45:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39D043F9B for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:45:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ryan@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1079) id CAFCCAE1C1; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:45:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:45:24 -0800 From: Ryan Dooley To: Bill Moran Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... Message-ID: <20030203204524.GB56152@elvis.mu.org> References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> <3E3ED0D4.6070601@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E3ED0D4.6070601@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'd consider fixing the situation thats causing it to need fscked before > doing > anything else! Heh.. yeah. Normally my box doesn't crash. The last time the box was down for any thing other than a maintaince window was over a year ago. I'd say the box was rock solid :-) > Sounds like you have enough users to have a pretty good idea of the average > bytes per file. Use -i to specify that when you newfs. Don't overdo it! > It's > pretty frustrating to have 400G left on the drive an no inodes left to > create > any new files, but if you've got 50% of the space full and only 20% of the > inodes, > you can definately adjust this some. I'm wondering what values I might try for -i that might be reasonable. > There's also -g and -h options. I'm not sure what effect these have, > however. Yeah, I saw those options as well, but since this is an academic environment, "average" doesn't apply :-) Cheers, Ryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 12:46:49 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4341B37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:46:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E6C43E4A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:46:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ryan@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1079) id 8D3FAAE216; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:46:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:46:44 -0800 From: Ryan Dooley To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... Message-ID: <20030203204644.GC56152@elvis.mu.org> References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > How many cylinder groups? Probably would help if I replied to the list as well. 1421 cpg. Cheers, Ryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 13: 8:28 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D4137B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:08:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from uitm.zenon.net (uitm.zenon.net [195.2.69.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB61843FA7 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:08:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from uitm@zenon.net) From: Andrey Alekseyev Message-Id: <200302032107.h13L7qh82700@uitm.zenon.net> Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... In-Reply-To: <20030203204524.GB56152@elvis.mu.org> from Ryan Dooley at "Feb 3, 2003 12:45:24 pm" To: Ryan Dooley Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:07:52 +0300 (MSK) Cc: Bill Moran , stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'm wondering what values I might try for -i that might be reasonable. I believe, you should examine your existing file system more closely. Recently we had a task of optimizing a large filesystem (300+ GB) for our large mail cluster (hundreds of thousands of mail accounts and about 10000+ mail domains). The filesystem itself was supposed to contain about 1500000 small files and about 400000 directories. For that task I had written a rather simple utility that traverses a directory tree and produces a statistics report on the number of files for each given range of size (less than 8KB, 8KB < n < 16KB, greater than 16KB, etc.). Also, the total number of files and directories is accumulated along with other interesting detail. I must say it was rather a useful information and food for thought before doing any optimization! :) However, I should mention, the OS is Solaris 8 and the filesystem is not UFS. I was optimizing given certain details on file system allocation mechanisms. Especially, block size was the question. -- Andrey Alekseyev. Zenon N.S.P. Senior Unix system administrator To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 13:14:49 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9889437B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:14:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net [24.53.161.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8442643F3F for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:14:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from potentialtech.com ([172.16.0.95]) by pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h13LGCT5072006; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:16:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Message-ID: <3E3EDB73.6030205@potentialtech.com> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:13:23 -0500 From: Bill Moran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20021127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Dooley Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> <3E3ED0D4.6070601@potentialtech.com> <20030203204524.GB56152@elvis.mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ryan Dooley wrote: >>I'd consider fixing the situation thats causing it to need fscked before >>doing >>anything else! > > Heh.. yeah. Normally my box doesn't crash. The last time the box was > down for any thing other than a maintaince window was over a year ago. I'd > say the box was rock solid :-) Well that's good to know. >>Sounds like you have enough users to have a pretty good idea of the average >>bytes per file. Use -i to specify that when you newfs. Don't overdo it! >>It's >>pretty frustrating to have 400G left on the drive an no inodes left to >>create >>any new files, but if you've got 50% of the space full and only 20% of the >>inodes, >>you can definately adjust this some. > > I'm wondering what values I might try for -i that might be reasonable. Do the math. df -hi will tell you the number of bytes and inodes used. Do a simple bytes/inodes and add about 10% just to be sure. That should take care of you. There are no "reasonable" values in my opinion. I have one client that makes a lot of files for robot machines (basically, text files). They don't get much longer than ~15K. If I redid their filesystem, I'd use 4000 bytes/inode. I have another client that's a graphic design firm, their server is filled with photo-quality tiffs and jpegs. I used 500000bytes/inode and the free space is still disappearing faster than the inodes are. If your server is 50% full, you should have enough data to make a reasonable estimate. Just pad it a little so you don't run out of inodes before you do free space. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 13:23:56 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA52D37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:23:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4FD43FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:23:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 18fo4D-0005AU-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:23:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:23:49 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" Message-ID: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ping: sendto: No buffer space available ping: sendto: No buffer space available I see this occasionally on my -stable box and havn't had a good explanation of why and what buffer. Searching isn't turning up anything useful. Is there something I can tweak to make this less likely ? P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 13:34:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6F937B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:34:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4DE43F85 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:34:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 87EDE536E; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:34:40 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Bill Moran Cc: Ryan Dooley , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 22:34:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3E3EDB73.6030205@potentialtech.com> (Bill Moran's message of "Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:13:23 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> <3E3ED0D4.6070601@potentialtech.com> <20030203204524.GB56152@elvis.mu.org> <3E3EDB73.6030205@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bill Moran writes: > Do the math. df -hi will tell you the number of bytes and inodes used. > Do a simple bytes/inodes and add about 10% just to be sure. > That should take care of you. You should *subtract* to be sure. Specify to newfs an average file size which is slightly lower than the measured average file size, so it creates slightly more inodes than you need. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 13:58:17 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FA437B405 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:58:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp6.wanadoo.nl (smtp6.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0786543F43 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:58:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from ams-gw.sohara.org (i0681.vwr.wanadoo.nl [194.134.210.172]) by smtp6.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 492E16FE0D; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:58:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:35:30 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: pir@pir.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ata problems Message-Id: <20030203193530.5bbe8241.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20030203174853.GA12779@pir.net> References: <20030203174853.GA12779@pir.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.7) X-Face: %]+HVL}K`P8>+8ZcY-WGHP6j@&mxMo9JH6_WdgIgUGH)JX/usO0%jy7T~IVgqjumD^OBqX,Kv^- GM6mlw(fI^$"QRKyZ$?xx/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:48:53 -0500 Peter Radcliffe wrote: PR> Updating to -STABLE as of yesterday morning the cdrom combo drive in PR> my laptop is not longer recognised. PR> PR> ata1-master: ATA identify retries exceeded Hmm my new Samsung 48x24x48 does that too sometimes at boot, my -stable is from 19 Jan. I was blaming the drive ... It looks like nothing in the ATA code has changed since December 16 in my sources. PR> If I use atacontrol to detatch and attach ata1 it appears; Doh! I was using reinit - that's a much better idea. -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 14: 7:38 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD4D37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:07:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net [24.53.161.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C52943E4A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:07:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from potentialtech.com ([172.16.0.95]) by pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h13M92T5072059 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:09:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Message-ID: <3E3EE7D5.2010401@potentialtech.com> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:06:13 -0500 From: Bill Moran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20021127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Radcliffe wrote: > ping: sendto: No buffer space available > ping: sendto: No buffer space available > > I see this occasionally on my -stable box and havn't had a good > explanation of why and what buffer. Searching isn't turning up > anything useful. > > Is there something I can tweak to make this less likely ? What kind of interface are you pinging through? I've seen this on a VPN where the VPN was running out of entropy (from /dev/random). I think it was a tun# interface. Could also be an MBUF thing. Does netstat -m say anything scary? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 14:10:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730C737B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lerlaptop.iadfw.net (lerlaptop.iadfw.net [206.66.13.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FA043F79 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:10:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lerlaptop.iadfw.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h13MATe7004604; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:10:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:10:29 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman To: Bill Moran , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" Message-ID: <336740000.1044310229@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> In-Reply-To: <3E3EE7D5.2010401@potentialtech.com> References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> <3E3EE7D5.2010401@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --On Monday, February 03, 2003 17:06:13 -0500 Bill Moran wrote: > Peter Radcliffe wrote: >> ping: sendto: No buffer space available >> ping: sendto: No buffer space available >> >> I see this occasionally on my -stable box and havn't had a good >> explanation of why and what buffer. Searching isn't turning up >> anything useful. >> >> Is there something I can tweak to make this less likely ? > > What kind of interface are you pinging through? > > I've seen this on a VPN where the VPN was running out of entropy > (from /dev/random). I think it was a tun# interface. > > Could also be an MBUF thing. Does netstat -m say anything scary? I've seen it with NMAP over my WI0 card (Linksys V3). MBUF's didn't show anything useful, unfortunately. LER > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 14:13:21 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E45F37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:13:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net [24.53.161.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73DE43F43 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:13:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from potentialtech.com ([172.16.0.95]) by pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h13MEiT5072070; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:14:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Message-ID: <3E3EE92C.6050809@potentialtech.com> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:11:56 -0500 From: Bill Moran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20021127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Ryan Dooley , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> <3E3ED0D4.6070601@potentialtech.com> <20030203204524.GB56152@elvis.mu.org> <3E3EDB73.6030205@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Bill Moran writes: > >>Do the math. df -hi will tell you the number of bytes and inodes used. >>Do a simple bytes/inodes and add about 10% just to be sure. >>That should take care of you. > > You should *subtract* to be sure. Specify to newfs an average file > size which is slightly lower than the measured average file size, so > it creates slightly more inodes than you need. Yes ... what he said ... (This may explain why I can never balance my checkbook ...) -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 14:30:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115F637B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:30:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A221E43F9B for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:30:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 18fp75-0005Zd-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:30:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:30:50 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" Message-ID: <20030203223050.GK12779@pir.net> Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> <3E3EE7D5.2010401@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E3EE7D5.2010401@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bill Moran probably said: > What kind of interface are you pinging through? I've seen it on various interfaces, in this case a Cisco 350 wireless card. > I've seen this on a VPN where the VPN was running out of entropy > (from /dev/random). I think it was a tun# interface. I have ipf enabled on that interface, no VPN and nothing that should require entropy. > Could also be an MBUF thing. Does netstat -m say anything scary? I'll take a look when I can provoke it again. P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 15: 3:22 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1000537B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:03:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6875B43E4A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:03:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA60842; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:03:13 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28465; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:03:13 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200302032303.KAA28465@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Gregory Bond Cc: Peter Radcliffe To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:23:49 -0500. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:03:12 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > ping: sendto: No buffer space available I've seen odd things like this when ipfw rules forbid the ping packets. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 15: 5: 5 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C38E37B631 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:05:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3FF43F3F for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:05:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 18fpeB-0005qY-00 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 18:05:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 18:05:03 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" Message-ID: <20030203230503.GM12779@pir.net> Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200302032303.KAA28465@lightning.itga.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302032303.KAA28465@lightning.itga.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Gregory Bond probably said: > I've seen odd things like this when ipfw rules forbid the ping packets. no ipfw, and ipmon says the packets are not being blocked (they get through most of the time, too). P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 15:35: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A01C37B40C for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:35:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from marvin.sko.mh.se (ior.medio.mh.se [193.10.250.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8094B43F75 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:35:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from myrslok@marvin.sko.mh.se) Received: from localhost (myrslok@localhost) by marvin.sko.mh.se (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h13NZs430914 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:35:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from myrslok@marvin.sko.mh.se) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:35:54 +0100 (CET) From: Mats Larsson To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" In-Reply-To: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> Message-ID: <20030204003205.T30858@marvin.sko.mh.se> References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On a 4.4 box I got this error using some old ep(4) card, a card switch Solved my problems back then. If you have the possible then test with a different card. // Mats On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Peter Radcliffe wrote: > ping: sendto: No buffer space available > ping: sendto: No buffer space available > > I see this occasionally on my -stable box and havn't had a good > explanation of why and what buffer. Searching isn't turning up > anything useful. > > Is there something I can tweak to make this less likely ? > > P. > > -- > pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 16: 1: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7EA37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from scan.pnc.com.au (scan.pnc.com.au [203.13.174.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B33C43E4A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:01:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peterh@criten.org) Received: (qmail 24444 invoked by uid 0); 4 Feb 2003 10:58:54 +1100 Received: from unknown (HELO dialup-134.123.221.203.acc03-high-pen.comindico.com.au) (203.13.174.5) by scan.pnc.com.au with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 10:58:52 +1100 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:47:39 +1100 (EST) From: Peter Hoskin X-X-Sender: peterh@extortion.peterh.dropbear.id.au To: Mats Larsson Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" In-Reply-To: <20030204003205.T30858@marvin.sko.mh.se> Message-ID: <20030204104638.C2574-100000@extortion.peterh.dropbear.id.au> References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> <20030204003205.T30858@marvin.sko.mh.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have this same issue on a PPTP interface invoked by MPD. I haven't been able to work it out, though it doesn't appear to be causing any problems... just error messages. *shrug* Regards, Peter Hoskin On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Mats Larsson wrote: > Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:35:54 +0100 (CET) > From: Mats Larsson > To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" > > > On a 4.4 box I got this error using some old ep(4) card, a card switch > Solved my problems back then. If you have the possible then test with a > different card. > > // Mats > > > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Peter Radcliffe wrote: > > > ping: sendto: No buffer space available > > ping: sendto: No buffer space available > > > > I see this occasionally on my -stable box and havn't had a good > > explanation of why and what buffer. Searching isn't turning up > > anything useful. > > > > Is there something I can tweak to make this less likely ? > > > > P. > > > > -- > > pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 16: 1:10 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53ABC37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:01:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E255B43FA7 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:01:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 18fqWS-0006O0-00 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 19:01:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:01:08 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" Message-ID: <20030204000108.GA23967@pir.net> Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> <20030204003205.T30858@marvin.sko.mh.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030204003205.T30858@marvin.sko.mh.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mats Larsson probably said: > On a 4.4 box I got this error using some old ep(4) card, a card > switch Solved my problems back then. If you have the possible then > test with a different card. A different card isn't much use - it's the built in wireless. P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 16:28: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AF537B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:27:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B3743E4A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:27:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h140RwSJ038635; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:27:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h140RwI8038634; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:27:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:27:58 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200302040027.h140RwI8038634@apollo.backplane.com> To: Peter Radcliffe Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> <20030204003205.T30858@marvin.sko.mh.se> <20030204000108.GA23967@pir.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Mats Larsson probably said: :> On a 4.4 box I got this error using some old ep(4) card, a card :> switch Solved my problems back then. If you have the possible then :> test with a different card. : :A different card isn't much use - it's the built in wireless. : :P. : :-- :pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu Check the queue statistics. It could be a queue overflow due to stalls in the wireless card accepting new packets, due to excessive collisions on a hard line. test2:/home/dillon> sysctl -a | fgrep ip.intr_qu net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen: 50 net.inet.ip.intr_queue_drops: 0 Queue drops can also occur if you are using large TCP buffers. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 16:28:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65F337B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:28:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from web000.govital.net (ns.govital.net [209.202.88.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749E143F43 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:28:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin@govital.net) Received: from govital.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web000.govital.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h140S33U002062; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:28:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from admin@govital.net) From: "Administrator" To: Larry Rosenman , Bill Moran , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:28:03 -0500 Message-Id: <20030204002803.M96973@govital.net> In-Reply-To: <336740000.1044310229@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> <3E3EE7D5.2010401@potentialtech.com> <336740000.1044310229@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 1.81 20021127 X-OriginatingIP: 209.202.68.222 (admin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings, I have seen this occur on numerous occasions from our network as it spans the city via wireless links. I see this most when we get interference on the same channel as someone else when they try to use the channels we are on, causing the access points to go a little crazy. Almost in all cases i have seen it has been from interference from other sources causing the interface to temporally loose link for a few breif seconds or loss of the access point completely due to interference. (We have some companies around here that don't like to play nice, and we have a very crowded radio space.) Just thought i would throw in my two cents. :-) On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:10:29 -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote > --On Monday, February 03, 2003 17:06:13 -0500 Bill Moran > wrote: > > > Peter Radcliffe wrote: > >> ping: sendto: No buffer space available > >> ping: sendto: No buffer space available > >> > >> I see this occasionally on my -stable box and havn't had a good > >> explanation of why and what buffer. Searching isn't turning up > >> anything useful. > >> > >> Is there something I can tweak to make this less likely ? > > > > What kind of interface are you pinging through? > > > > I've seen this on a VPN where the VPN was running out of entropy > > (from /dev/random). I think it was a tun# interface. > > > > Could also be an MBUF thing. Does netstat -m say anything scary? > I've seen it with NMAP over my WI0 card (Linksys V3). > > MBUF's didn't show anything useful, unfortunately. > > LER > > > > > -- > > Bill Moran > > Potential Technologies > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > -- > Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler > Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org > US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Chris Demers admin@govital.net www.govital.net www.govitalhosting.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 17:19:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A8A37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:19:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.iskon.hr (mail.iskon.hr [213.191.128.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B91AE43F79 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:19:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zec@tel.fer.hr) Received: (qmail 5914 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 02:19:37 +0100 Received: from zg06-101.dialin.iskon.hr (HELO tel.fer.hr) (213.191.148.102) by mail.iskon.hr with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 02:19:37 +0100 Message-ID: <3E3F152D.6BE3A41B@tel.fer.hr> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 02:19:41 +0100 From: Marko Zec X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Peter Radcliffe , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> <20030204003205.T30858@marvin.sko.mh.se> <20030204000108.GA23967@pir.net> <200302040027.h140RwI8038634@apollo.backplane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Dillon wrote: > :Mats Larsson probably said: > :> On a 4.4 box I got this error using some old ep(4) card, a card > :> switch Solved my problems back then. If you have the possible then > :> test with a different card. > : > :A different card isn't much use - it's the built in wireless. > > Check the queue statistics. It could be a queue overflow due to > stalls in the wireless card accepting new packets, due to > excessive collisions on a hard line. > > test2:/home/dillon> sysctl -a | fgrep ip.intr_qu > net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen: 50 > net.inet.ip.intr_queue_drops: 0 Hmm... the issue here is with interface _outbound_ buffers, not with the IP inbound queue. Despite ping / ip_output() claiming ENOBUFS, net.inet.ip.intr_queue_drops will probably remain unchanged. netstat -s / netstat -i would probably offer better diagnostics in this case. Marko To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 20:37:34 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E7D37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:37:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-224.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A0C43F79 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:37:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h144bWZh004559; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:37:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h144bQEc004558; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:37:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:37:26 -0800 From: David Schultz To: Ryan Dooley Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... Message-ID: <20030204043726.GA4323@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ryan Dooley , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Ryan Dooley : > I'm looking for recommendations on the newfs options for a 1.0TB file system > for say /home (it's a fileserver for 52000+ accounts that range from having > 4k to 40GB in their directories.) > > When I initally created the file system, the options I set are: block size of > 65536 and a fragsize of 8192. IIRC, block sizes greater than 16384 can cause significant buffer cache fragmentation, which can reduce I/O performance. Moreover, blocks that large will waste space and I/O bandwidth unless most of the files on the disk are very large. A smaller setting, e.g. the default, is probably more appropriate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 21: 6:38 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1074437B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:06:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85AE43F3F for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:06:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ryan@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1079) id 896C6AE165; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:06:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:06:31 -0800 From: Ryan Dooley To: Ryan Dooley , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... Message-ID: <20030204050631.GB81935@elvis.mu.org> References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> <20030204043726.GA4323@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030204043726.GA4323@HAL9000.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > IIRC, block sizes greater than 16384 can cause significant buffer > cache fragmentation, which can reduce I/O performance. Moreover, > blocks that large will waste space and I/O bandwidth unless most > of the files on the disk are very large. A smaller setting, > e.g. the default, is probably more appropriate. The default wasted too much disk space (we didn't get that 1.0TB of usable space out of it (it was more like 893GB of total usable space.) I do think I am wasting a bit of space. We have under 300 users with more than 150MB of used disk. The rest of the users have between 4k and 100MB worth of materials. Most things are web pages and images (what about 8k a page and 16k for a good png or 64k or a good jpg?) This is kind of why I'm asking. As for performance impacts, I've not seen too much in the way of that. This is one of the fastest file systems I've got in production. The two other "big" file systems are two raids formated with Linux's reiserfs which are pretty darn fast when it comes to smaller files. Overall, I'm really impressed by FreeBSD's stability and scaleablity. The file server has just done more than I would have ever expected and with over a year worth of uptime since our last, um, issue, it's gone the distance... you definatly don't get that from Linux or any MS product. The only thing I'd want from FreeBSD is clustering and HA (with failover for NFS and SAMBA :-) To the development team: Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 3 21:31:37 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA5037B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:31:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-224.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F2B43F93 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:31:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h145VXZh004870; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:31:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h145VXFS004869; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:31:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:31:33 -0800 From: David Schultz To: Ryan Dooley Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... Message-ID: <20030204053133.GA4802@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ryan Dooley , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> <20030204043726.GA4323@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030204050631.GB81935@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030204050631.GB81935@elvis.mu.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Ryan Dooley : > > IIRC, block sizes greater than 16384 can cause significant buffer > > cache fragmentation, which can reduce I/O performance. Moreover, > > blocks that large will waste space and I/O bandwidth unless most > > of the files on the disk are very large. A smaller setting, > > e.g. the default, is probably more appropriate. > > The default wasted too much disk space (we didn't get that 1.0TB of > usable space out of it (it was more like 893GB of total usable space.) > > I do think I am wasting a bit of space. We have under 300 users with more > than 150MB of used disk. The rest of the users have between 4k and 100MB worth > of materials. Most things are web pages and images (what about 8k a page and > 16k for a good png or 64k or a good jpg?) When you say ``the default wasted too much disk space'', do you mean that when you formatted the filesystem, you had less space than you expected, or do you mean that there was less space left after you put all of your data on it? Smaller block sizes mean more space for free block bitmaps, which are allocated at filesystem creation time, but overall they are a win in terms of space because of reduced internal fragmentation. Consider what happens when you put a 10K file on the disk. Depending on whether the filesystem is optimizing for space or time, that file will take up 16K or 64K in your 64/16 filesystem, but substantially less with a 16/2 FS. So unless you are expecting most of your files to be rather large, a smaller block size may be beneficial. Note, however, that I'm not an FFS expert; other factors such as fragmentation may be relevant. > As for performance impacts, I've not seen too much in the way of that. This > is one of the fastest file systems I've got in production. The two other > "big" file systems are two raids formated with Linux's reiserfs which are > pretty darn fast when it comes to smaller files. That's good to know. I remember that Matt pointed out the buffer cache fragmentation issue some time ago, but nothing seems to have changed in terms of buffer sizes since then. Perhaps it isn't as big an issue as originally thought. (Does anyone know if it's possible to tune BKVASIZE easily, and if there are any caveats?) I would also be interested in knowing how FFS and reiserfs compare with respect to filesystem age. Does performance drop significantly after a year? If the research I've seen is right, FFS performance shouldn't drop more than 20% unless the filesystem is nearly full, and reiserfs has a cleaner... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 4 0:22:35 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACBE37B406 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-relay.omnis.com (smtp-relay.omnis.com [216.239.128.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4EE43FB1 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:22:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (66-75-151-22.san.rr.com [66.75.151.22]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4695643623; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:17:33 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" From: Wes Peters To: Marko Zec Cc: Matthew Dillon , Peter Radcliffe , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3E3F152D.6BE3A41B@tel.fer.hr> References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> <20030204003205.T30858@marvin.sko.mh.se> <20030204000108.GA23967@pir.net> <200302040027.h140RwI8038634@apollo.backplane.com> <3E3F152D.6BE3A41B@tel.fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Softweyr LLC Message-Id: <1044321375.358.66.camel@zaphod.softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 04 Feb 2003 01:16:15 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 01:19, Marko Zec wrote: > Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > :Mats Larsson probably said: > > :> On a 4.4 box I got this error using some old ep(4) card, a card > > :> switch Solved my problems back then. If you have the possible then > > :> test with a different card. > > : > > :A different card isn't much use - it's the built in wireless. > > > > Check the queue statistics. It could be a queue overflow due to > > stalls in the wireless card accepting new packets, due to > > excessive collisions on a hard line. > > > > test2:/home/dillon> sysctl -a | fgrep ip.intr_qu > > net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen: 50 > > net.inet.ip.intr_queue_drops: 0 > > Hmm... the issue here is with interface _outbound_ buffers, not with the IP > inbound queue. Despite ping / ip_output() claiming ENOBUFS, > net.inet.ip.intr_queue_drops will probably remain unchanged. netstat -s / > netstat -i would probably offer better diagnostics in this case. In particular, this is the warn() on line 786 of ping.c (4.7-R): 777 i = sendto(s, (char *)outpack, cc, 0, (struct sockaddr *)&whereto, 778 sizeof(whereto)); 779 780 if (i < 0 || i != cc) { 781 if (i < 0) { 782 if (options & F_FLOOD && errno == ENOBUFS) { 783 usleep(FLOOD_BACKOFF); 784 return; 785 } 786 warn("sendto"); 787 } else { 788 warn("%s: partial write: %d of %d bytes", 789 hostname, i, cc); 790 } 791 } The sendto() on line 777 failed because there is insufficient buffer space to buffer any more icmp packets. The usual reason for this is the machine you're attempting to ping can't be reached via whatever route you're using. -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 4 2:38:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72DB37B401 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:38:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591A443F85 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:38:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h14Acbq5057666 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:38:37 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Message-ID: <3E3F9801.437E7CA3@kuzbass.ru> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:37:53 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: bin/45754: vnconfig(8) fails to return correct exit status Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! Please review a patch in this PR: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/45754 Correct scripting is very hard when system utility returns wrong exit status. Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 4 2:43:20 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D3537B401 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:43:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCBE43F43 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:43:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 1F8B9536E; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:43:16 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:43:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030203223050.GK12779@pir.net> (Peter Radcliffe's message of "Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:30:50 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030203212349.GG12779@pir.net> <3E3EE7D5.2010401@potentialtech.com> <20030203223050.GK12779@pir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Radcliffe writes: > Bill Moran probably said: > > What kind of interface are you pinging through? > I've seen it on various interfaces, in this case a Cisco 350 wireless > card. Interference is preventing the card from transmitting, causing packets to accumulate in the outgoing queue. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 4 3:56:34 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF3037B401 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:56:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B205A43F43 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:56:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 5A09F536F; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:56:30 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Dmitry Parfenov Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSH 3.5p1 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:56:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <15864855797.20030204142801@itn.ru> (Dmitry Parfenov's message of "Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:28:01 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <15864855797.20030204142801@itn.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dmitry Parfenov writes: > Feb 4 11:00:58 P1 sshd[48147]: pam_start: malloc failed for pam_conv > Feb 4 11:00:58 P1 sshd[48147]: fatal: PAM: initialisation failed > Feb 4 11:01:37 P1 sshd[53308]: pam_start: malloc failed for pam_conv > Feb 4 11:01:37 P1 sshd[53308]: fatal: PAM: initialisation failed That has already been fixed. I tested on a different machine than the one I committed from, and left out one last-minute patch before committing. The irony is that the patch in question did get committed to -CURRENT, where it's not needed... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 4 6:17:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD87437B401 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 06:17:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug.clues.com [194.159.1.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ADA43FA7 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 06:17:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h14Eo95n043258 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:50:09 GMT (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h14Eo9cK043257 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:50:09 GMT Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:50:09 +0000 From: Geoff Buckingham To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: HP/Compaq DL580 G2 Message-ID: <20030204145009.GA43238@chuggalug.clues.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anybody got the Broadcom NIC provides with these systems to work with 4.7? or at all? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 4 6:39: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F404737B401 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 06:39:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0098943F85 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 06:38:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (root@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6/Sunbay) with SMTP id h14Ec6Vh020849 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:38:06 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6/Sunbay) with ESMTP id h14Ec6xQ020827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:38:06 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h14Ec6x0020822; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:38:06 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:38:05 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Geoff Buckingham Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP/Compaq DL580 G2 Message-ID: <20030204143805.GB14893@sunbay.com> References: <20030204145009.GA43238@chuggalug.clues.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030204145009.GA43238@chuggalug.clues.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:50:09PM +0000, Geoff Buckingham wrote: > Anybody got the Broadcom NIC provides with these systems to work with 4.7? >=20 > or at all? >=20 Gigabit one? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+P9BNUkv4P6juNwoRAgkSAJ4inDHnN0/4MgiJXjQOUhyRmseY/wCfRy3c uCnBYbKgiLIJVGTZodF95tQ= =5tp/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 4 7: 4:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A7837B401; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 07:04:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug.clues.com [194.159.1.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E85543F3F; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 07:04:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h14Fal5n043391; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:36:47 GMT (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h14FalRq043390; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:36:47 GMT Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:36:47 +0000 From: Geoff Buckingham To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HP/Compaq DL580 G2 Message-ID: <20030204153647.GB43238@chuggalug.clues.com> References: <20030204145009.GA43238@chuggalug.clues.com> <20030204143805.GB14893@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030204143805.GB14893@sunbay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 04:38:05PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:50:09PM +0000, Geoff Buckingham wrote: > > Anybody got the Broadcom NIC provides with these systems to work with 4.7? > > > > or at all? > > > Gigabit one? > I have bee looking into this, the machine is a loaner, it contains three em's which I can see fine, an fxp and a bge which I can not. The two nics I cant see are not listed as unknown devices either, they seem to be hidden behind the compaq hotplug pci controller (0xa0f7) Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #0: Wed Oct 9 15:08:34 GMT 2002 root@builder.freebsdmall.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium 4 (1599.95-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf11 Stepping = 1 Features=0x3febfbff,ACC> real memory = 2147459072 (2097128K bytes) avail memory = 2086514688 (2037612K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc050f000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci0: (vendor=0x0e11, dev=0xb203) at 2.0 irq 3 pci0: (vendor=0x0e11, dev=0xb204) at 2.2 irq 5 pci0: at 3.0 isab0: at device 15.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x2000-0x200f,0x374-0x377,0x1 70-0x177,0x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ohci0: mem 0xeefe0000-0xeefe0fff irq 10 at devic e 15.2 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcib1: on motherboard pci1: on pcib1 ciss0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xf01f0000-0xf01f3fff,0xf0 2c0000-0xf02fffff irq 11 at device 1.0 on pci1 ciss0: using 256 of 1024 available commands ciss0: 1 logical drive configured ciss0: firmware 1.80 ciss0: 2 SCSI channels ciss0: signature 'CISS' ciss0: valence 1 ciss0: supported I/O methods 0xe ciss0: active I/O method 0x3 ciss0: 4G page base 0x00000000 ciss0: interrupt coalesce delay 1000us ciss0: interrupt coalesce count 16 ciss0: max outstanding commands 1024 ciss0: bus types 0x2 ciss0: server name '' ciss0: heartbeat 0x30000058 ciss0: 1 logical drive ciss0: logical drive 0: RAID 5, 34304MB online pcib2: on motherboard pci2: on pcib2 em0: mem 0xf2bd0000-0xf 2bdffff,0xf2be0000-0xf2bfffff irq 10 at device 1.0 on pci2 em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A em1: mem 0xf2b90000-0xf 2b9ffff,0xf2ba0000-0xf2bbffff irq 5 at device 2.0 on pci2 em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pci2: (vendor=0x0e11, dev=0xa0f7) at 30.0 irq 3 pcib3: on motherboard pci3: on pcib3 pcib4: on motherboard pci4: on pcib4 pcib5: on motherboard pci5: on pcib5 pcib6: on motherboard pci6: on pcib6 em2: mem 0xf7cd0000-0xf 7cdffff,0xf7ce0000-0xf7cfffff irq 10 at device 2.0 on pci6 em2: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pci6: (vendor=0x0e11, dev=0xa0f7) at 30.0 irq 10 pcib7: on motherboard pci7: on pcib7 pcib8: on motherboard pci8: on pcib8 eisa0: on motherboard mainboard0: on eisa0 slot 0 orm0: ¦L¶r¾÷

·s¦~§ª«°e±z¤@¥x¦L¶r¾÷ ...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 12:58:39 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F029537B401 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:58:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from web13504.mail.yahoo.com (web13504.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 997F743E4A for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:58:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from us23north@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030205205833.89613.qmail@web13504.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.248.84.109] by web13504.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:58:33 PST Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:58:33 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Buchanan Subject: Was Re: Make Buildworld dies in usr.sbin/ppp, now it stops in To: Kris Kennaway Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030205185645.GA11412@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello List and Kris, I did that and that fixed that problem, and a few other similar problems in usr.sbin (it happened in two other subdirectories.) Thank you for that idea! Very likely I will end up needing that again some time in the future. Now its stopping in usr.bin/binutils/ld. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am running FreeBSD Stable 4.7 #5 (11/17/2002). TIA! --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Remove the bogus usr.sbin/ppp/ppp directory, as > hinted by the error message. > > Kris > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature The error is report is here: eelf_i386.c:922: warning: implicit declaration of function `lang_add_section' eelf_i386.c: In function `gldelf_i386_finish': eelf_i386.c:1163: warning: implicit declaration of function `lang_reset_memory_regions' In file included from eelf_i386.c:2422: /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include/getopt.h: At top level: /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include/getopt.h:115: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../libbfd/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include -DDEFAULT_EMULATION=\"elf_i386\" -DTARGET=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\" -DSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libdata\" -DBFD_VERSION_STRING=\""2.12.1 [FreeBSD] 2002-07-20"\" -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/ldcref.c cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../libbfd/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include -DDEFAULT_EMULATION=\"elf_i386\" -DTARGET=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\" -DSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libdata\" -DBFD_VERSION_STRING=\""2.12.1 [FreeBSD] 2002-07-20"\" -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/ldctor.c cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../libbfd/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include -DDEFAULT_EMULATION=\"elf_i386\" -DTARGET=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\" -DSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libdata\" -DBFD_VERSION_STRING=\""2.12.1 [FreeBSD] 2002-07-20"\" -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/ldemul.c cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../libbfd/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include -DDEFAULT_EMULATION=\"elf_i386\" -DTARGET=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\" -DSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libdata\" -DBFD_VERSION_STRING=\""2.12.1 [FreeBSD] 2002-07-20"\" -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/ldexp.c cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../libbfd/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include -DDEFAULT_EMULATION=\"elf_i386\" -DTARGET=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\" -DSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libdata\" -DBFD_VERSION_STRING=\""2.12.1 [FreeBSD] 2002-07-20"\" -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/ldfile.c cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../libbfd/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include -DDEFAULT_EMULATION=\"elf_i386\" -DTARGET=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\" -DSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libdata\" -DBFD_VERSION_STRING=\""2.12.1 [FreeBSD] 2002-07-20"\" -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c ldgram.c cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../libbfd/i386 -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include -DDEFAULT_EMULATION=\"elf_i386\" -DTARGET=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\" -DSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libdata\" -DBFD_VERSION_STRING=\""2.12.1 [FreeBSD] 2002-07-20"\" -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/ld -I/backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/ldlang.c /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/ldlang.c: In function `section_already_linked': /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/ldlang.c:1016: structure has no member named `kept_section' *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld. *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils. *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 13:20:16 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57BC37B409 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:20:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from yahoo.com.tw (135.0.30.61.isp.tfn.net.tw [61.30.0.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2FB43FAF for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:20:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conychangkimo@yahoo.com.tw) From: jerry@FreeBSD.ORG To: µ¹»{¯u¥´«÷ªºªB¤Í@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ¸gÀ礧¯«ªº¯µ±K Reply-To: conychangkimo@yahoo.com.tw Date: 06 Feb 2003 05:40:10 +0800 Organization: Foobar Inc. X-Mailer: Gammadyne Mailer x-delete-me: 1 (this tells Gammadyne's server to delete the message) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20030205212012.5A2FB43FAF@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ¦L¶r¾÷

·s¦~§ª«°e±z¤@¥x¦L¶r¾÷ ...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 14:37:19 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232A537B401 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mako1.telstra.net (mako1.telstra.net [203.50.0.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF18B43FCE for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:37:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peterm@telstra.net) Received: from GALAXY (rsdhcp17.telstra.net [203.50.0.211]) by mako1.telstra.net (8.11.3/8.11.1) with SMTP id h15Mb9H55199 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:37:09 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peterm@telstra.net) From: "Peter Marrinon" To: Subject: Support for Compaq/HP DL380 G3 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:37:06 +1100 Message-ID: <001201c2cd67$1d624420$15008590@GALAXY> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have successfully got SMP with HTT working on a Compaq/HP DL380 G3 with FreeBSD 4-STABLE (as at 5/2/2003). Within BIOS, it is necessary to change the "MPS Table Mode" to "Full Table APIC" or "Full Table Mapped". Note, unlike "Auto", these two options apparently ignore the Operating System option (which I have set to "Other OS"). One thing I have noticed is that it does not seem to matter whether "Processing Hyper-Threading" is set to enabled or disabled - in either case HTT is a feature that FreeBSD sees. Regards, Peter --------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Marrinon Systems Engineer Internet Development Global IP Networks Telstra +61 2 6208 1684 peterm@telstra.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 15: 3: 9 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BF937B401 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from infected.bounceme.net (c-b8c670d5.011-185-73746f23.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.112.198.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A3D43FD3 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:02:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikelevi@infected.bounceme.net) Received: from infected.bounceme.net (mikelevi@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by infected.bounceme.net (8.12.7/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h15N6Tt8072125 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 00:06:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mikelevi@infected.bounceme.net) Received: from localhost (mikelevi@localhost) by infected.bounceme.net (8.12.7/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h15N6SXP072122 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 00:06:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 00:06:28 +0100 (CET) From: "mikelevi@infected.bounceme.net" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030206000505.X72121@infected.bounceme.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 15:29: 4 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0A637B401 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DD643F93 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:29:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ps@yogurt.yahoo.com) Received: from yogurt.yahoo.com (yogurt.yahoo.com [216.145.52.186]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id h15NSt346434; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:28:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ps@localhost) by yogurt.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h15NSsH58590; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:28:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ps) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:28:54 -0800 From: Paul Saab To: Peter Marrinon Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for Compaq/HP DL380 G3 Message-ID: <20030205232854.GA58558@yahoo-inc.com> References: <001201c2cd67$1d624420$15008590@GALAXY> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001201c2cd67$1d624420$15008590@GALAXY> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just set the operating system to Linux and you dont have to worry about changing the other settings. Be aware, the ethernet device may not always come up with a miibus. I still need to MFC the following patch to make it work reliably. http://people.freebsd.org/~ps/bge.diff Peter Marrinon (peterm@telstra.net) wrote: > I have successfully got SMP with HTT working on a Compaq/HP DL380 G3 with > FreeBSD 4-STABLE (as at 5/2/2003). > > Within BIOS, it is necessary to change the "MPS Table Mode" to "Full Table > APIC" or "Full Table Mapped". Note, unlike "Auto", these two options > apparently ignore the Operating System option (which I have set to "Other > OS"). > > One thing I have noticed is that it does not seem to matter whether > "Processing Hyper-Threading" is set to enabled or disabled - in either case > HTT is a feature that FreeBSD sees. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 16: 4:17 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B307237B405 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:04:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE98443FBF for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:04:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john.cagle@hp.com) Received: from cceexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net (cceexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.110.250.125]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF434CA; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:04:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from cceexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.110.250.85]) by cceexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:04:13 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Support for Compaq/HP DL380 G3 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:04:12 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Support for Compaq/HP DL380 G3 Thread-Index: AcLNbmE+JVEGBm7BTCa1RB64z7vjkQAA7cBQ From: "Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)" To: "Peter Marrinon" Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2003 00:04:13.0083 (UTC) FILETIME=[47E3A6B0:01C2CD73] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You can also set the OS for Windows 2000. That makes the "Auto" setting for MPS Table Mode to be Full Table (not Mapped), which may be a little more efficient w.r.t. interrupt distribution. > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Saab [mailto:ps@freebsd.org]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:29 PM > To: Peter Marrinon > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Support for Compaq/HP DL380 G3 >=20 > Just set the operating system to Linux and you dont have to=20 > worry about changing the other settings. >=20 > Be aware, the ethernet device may not always come up with a=20 > miibus. I still need to MFC the following patch to make it=20 > work reliably. >=20 http://people.freebsd.org/~ps/bge.diff Peter Marrinon (peterm@telstra.net) wrote: > I have successfully got SMP with HTT working on a Compaq/HP DL380 G3=20 > with FreeBSD 4-STABLE (as at 5/2/2003). >=20 > Within BIOS, it is necessary to change the "MPS Table Mode" to "Full=20 > Table APIC" or "Full Table Mapped". Note, unlike "Auto", these two=20 > options apparently ignore the Operating System option (which I have=20 > set to "Other OS"). >=20 > One thing I have noticed is that it does not seem to matter whether=20 > "Processing Hyper-Threading" is set to enabled or disabled - in either > case HTT is a feature that FreeBSD sees. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 17:56:42 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7645437B401 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:56:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-relay.omnis.com (smtp-relay.omnis.com [216.239.128.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56D843FDD for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:56:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from salty.rapid.stbernard.com (corp-2.ipinc.com [199.245.188.2]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8754942DEF; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:56:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:56:32 -0800 From: Wes Peters To: Erik Paulsen =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sk=E5lerud?= Cc: gunnar.flygt@sr.se, ponomarew@oberon.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: error making new kernel Message-Id: <20030205175632.6389474a.wes@softweyr.com> In-Reply-To: <000b01c2cd13$0590bec0$0a00000a@yes.no> References: <20030205085720.GB20599@sr.se> <000b01c2cd13$0590bec0$0a00000a@yes.no> Organization: Softweyr.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:35:06 +0100 Erik Paulsen Skålerud alleged: > This is a pretty frequent question that I see alot of on the lists and > in different FreeBSD-channels on IRC. Then it should *obviously* be in a FAQ, shouldn't it? > Perhaps someone should implent some kind of kernel-config checker that > sees over the config and tells the user if something important is > missing (like scsbus and da if you're going to use umass). > I am sure that there are several other things it could check aswell. We already have such a tool, it's called 'make'. The compiler has provided a meaningful message. I'm astonished at how upset some people get at compiler "error" messages, I see them hundreds of times every day. Rather than give people another crutch to keep them from learning the system (aka the Linux X11 configuration tool) we should invest our time in teaching people to read the compiler messages and make learned corrections. This lesson is so old it's found in ancient apocryphal documents. You know, the 'teach a man to fish vs. give a man a fish' lesson? ;^) > I'd love to make one myself, the only problem is that I don't know > enough about shell-scripting to do this. Phew! Now you don't have to. ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 19:54:24 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849A237B401 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:54:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428FA43FBF for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:54:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277398A2DA9 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:54:16 -0400 (AST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:54:15 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ip_output args changed ... ? Message-ID: <20030205235333.C63349@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Can't find a man page for it, so can someone tell me what I need to do to get this fixed? netdump_client.c: In function `netdump_output': netdump_client.c:162: too few arguments to function `ip_output' *** Error code 1 Stop in /root/netdump. jupiter# grep ip_output * netdump_client.c: error = ip_output(m, NULL, &ro, IP_ALLOWBROADCAST, 0); Thanks ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 20:42:43 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC31A37B41E for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:42:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from yahoo.ca (host-147-94-220-24.midco.net [24.220.94.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2215C44042 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:42:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ejaculatetweq@yahoo.ca) Message-ID: <000311c2ae21$acb68246$64533812@xnxretq.wjo> From: To: Subject: bigger is better Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 04:14:05 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG VP-R<!Tdr>X Pen<!Tdr>is Enlargeme<!Tdr>nt Pill<!Tdr>s
VP-RX Penis Enlargement Pills

Click Here

Finally!! A medical breakthrough in science has enabled a team of doctors and sex experts to create a pill that is designed to enlarge the male penis by length and width. Our tests show that out of 1,500 test subjects, the average gain after 4 months on DP-RX was 2.94 Inches! Amazing, Permanent results that will last.

-Gain Up To 3+ Full Inches In Length

-Expand Your Penis Up To 20% Thicker

-Stop Premature Ejaculation!

-Produce Stronger, Rock Hard Erections

-100% Safe To Take, With NO Side Effects

-Fast Priority Fed-Ex Shipping WorldWide

-Doctor Approved And Recommended

-No Pumps! No Surgery! No Exercises!

-100% Money Back Guarantee

-FREE Bottle Of VP-RX Worth Over $50

-FREE Male Help E-Book Worth Over $50

Click Here



opt-out
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 21:56:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914DE37B401 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-74-80.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.74.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C0243F3F for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:56:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778C167B88; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:56:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 585D5E64; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:56:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:56:55 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Eric Buchanan Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Was Re: Make Buildworld dies in usr.sbin/ppp, now it stops in Message-ID: <20030206055655.GA13998@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030205185645.GA11412@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030205205833.89613.qmail@web13504.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030205205833.89613.qmail@web13504.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:58:33PM -0800, Eric Buchanan wrote: >=20 > Hello List and Kris, > I did that and that fixed that problem, and a few > other similar problems in usr.sbin (it happened in two > other subdirectories.) Thank you for that idea! Very > likely I will end up needing that again some time in > the future. >=20 >=20 > Now its stopping in usr.bin/binutils/ld. Any help > would be greatly appreciated. I am running FreeBSD > Stable 4.7 #5 (11/17/2002). TIA! The fact that you're getting these in the first place indicates some kind of corruption of your source tree and/or filesystem. You may need to remove it and check it out again. Kris --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+QfknWry0BWjoQKURAuz4AKCpOCcmbOw/UlEiqd50aDpEB0vbEQCbBsV2 7Ge0W0l+h4vFqfhhf8vH6ZA= =Lnn/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 5 22:38:16 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2AF37B401 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:38:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rockshows.com.br (200191011144-dial-user-BOL.acessonet.com.br [200.191.11.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43FCA43F85 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:38:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fatorcincoo@rockshows.com.br) From: "Banda Fator Cinco" To: Subject: Dê uma Força ao Nosso Rock Nacional Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 04:38:54 -0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20030206063800.43FCA43F85@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Banda Fator Cinco
 
Pedimos a você que esta recebendo este e-mail para dar uma força ao nosso rock nacional, a banda Fator Cinco teve uma de suas musicas veiculada na 89 FM (A Rádio Rock) e na KISS FM não custa nada a gente pedir a música de novo e quem sabe ela poder entrar na programação destas rádio. Vamos lá pessoal !!!
 
A música chama-se 11 DE SETEMBRO e para pedi-la na 89FM mande um e-mail para avezdobrasil@89fm.com.br ou ligue para 252-6543 e para pedir na KISS FM mande um e-mail para kissfm@kissfm.com.br .  
 
Vamos pedir a música novamente para fazer a Fator Cinco entrar na programação destas rádios, contamos com sua ajuda . VALEU !!!
 
Você pode ouvir o trecho desta música e conhecer melhor a banda Fator Cinco acessando:
 
Um grande abraço da família Fator Cinco
 
INFORMATIVO
 
 

 Caso não queira mais receber nossos informativos Click aqui

 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 3:22:23 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BD237B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 03:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from 12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com [12.234.22.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C1843F93 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 03:22:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from slave.gorean.org (1s8hg9s9xwx7xizk@slave.gorean.org [10.0.0.1]) by 12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h16BMIh9053755; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 03:22:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 03:22:18 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Ryan Dooley Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: recommendations on the newfs of a 1.0TB fs... In-Reply-To: <20030204050631.GB81935@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: <20030206031326.K40993@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> References: <20030203194828.GA55143@elvis.mu.org> <20030204043726.GA4323@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030204050631.GB81935@elvis.mu.org> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Ryan Dooley wrote: > > IIRC, block sizes greater than 16384 can cause significant buffer > > cache fragmentation, which can reduce I/O performance. Moreover, > > blocks that large will waste space and I/O bandwidth unless most > > of the files on the disk are very large. A smaller setting, > > e.g. the default, is probably more appropriate. > > The default wasted too much disk space (we didn't get that 1.0TB of > usable space out of it (it was more like 893GB of total usable space.) FWIW, when I was approaching a similar problem a few years ago (big fs with lots of little files), I was told that a good way to get maximum disk utilization and performance was to figure the size that roughly 75-80% of your files would fit into, and make this the fragment size. Multiply this by 8 to get the block size, and newfs to your heart's content. This formula has worked really well for me, and drastically improved the performance of the systems in question. My rough understanding of why this works is that when reading a block, you want to pick up as many files as you can in one pass. For files larger than your fragment size, the amount of space "wasted" by non-full fragments will have a minimal impact on your disk utilization because most of your files will be within a fragment already. Make sure to heed the warnings in the man page for the -b and -f options. HTH, Doug -- If it's moving, encrypt it. If it's not moving, encrypt it till it moves, then encrypt it some more. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 8:33:46 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62BF37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:33:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from orngca-mls02.socal.rr.com (orngca-mls02.socal.rr.com [66.75.160.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E63043F85 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:33:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from Glenn-Mobile.antimatter.net (66-74-231-102.san.rr.com [66.74.231.102]) by orngca-mls02.socal.rr.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h167B6n02378 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:11:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030205231301.035216a0@199.184.188.23> X-Sender: glenn@199.184.188.23 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 23:13:11 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson Subject: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a D-Link DWL-520 in a box running -STABLE that's acting as a router. I recently switched to using it in hostap mode instead of ad-hoc. After large amounts of traffic (such as copying a large file) on the wireless interface, it stops responding. Traffic on the other two (wired) interfaces continues as normal. The only way I've been able to get things working again is a reboot. The following error appears in messages: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear Is this a known problem with the DWL-520? Anyone else seen the same thing? I can provide more info if needed. Any help would be much appreciated. -Glenn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 9:33:42 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340E437B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:33:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ops.tamu.edu (ops.tamu.edu [165.91.250.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943C243F75 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:33:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nipsy@ops.tamu.edu) Received: from nipsy by ops.tamu.edu with local (Exim 4.10) id 18gpu3-00082m-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 11:33:35 -0600 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:33:35 -0600 From: Mark Nipper To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: another crash with 4.7-STABLE Message-ID: <20030206173334.GD22018@ops.tamu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, I should have learned my lesson, but I didn't. I had a seemingly stable running kernel which was using code from CVS (using RELENG_4) from around Wed Dec 18 16:01:04 CST 2002 until just a couple of days ago when I still hadn't seen the sporadic crashes which I'd been seeing. SO, I figured that whatever was wrong with versions prior to that had been fixed and I decided to update to the latest STABLE again, just for the hell of it. BIG MISTAKE. :( So, I was running STABLE from around Tue Feb 4 10:46:08 CST 2003 for just about two days (1d21h12m2s to be exact) and oops, it crashed. Here's all the info: --- t@ops/p0:/home/crash> gdb -k kernel.debug.1 vmcore.1 GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition= s. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"...Deprecated bfd_read cal= led at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxrea= d.c line 2627 in elfstab_build_psymtabs Deprecated bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../..= /contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxread.c line 933 in fill_symbuf IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x0031d000 initial pcb at physical address 0x00297be0 panicstr: vm_page_remove(): page not found in hash panic messages: --- panic: vm_page_remove(): page not found in hash syncing disks... 19 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 11 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 = 4=20 done Uptime: 1d21h12m2s dumping to dev #ad/0x20009, offset 2350209 dump ata0: resetting devices .. done 768 767 766 765 764 763 762 761 760 759 758 757 756 755 754 753 752 751 750= 749 748 747 746 745 744 743 742 741 740 739 738 737 736 735 734 733 732 73= 1 730 729 728 727 726 725 724 723 722 721 720 719 718 717 716 715 714 713 7= 12 711 710 709 708 707 706 705 704 703 702 701 700 699 698 697 696 695 694 = 693 692 691 690 689 688 687 686 685 684 683 682 681 680 679 678 677 676 675= 674 673 672 671 670 669 668 667 666 665 664 663 662 661 660 659 658 657 65= 6 655 654 653 652 651 650 649 648 647 646 645 644 643 642 641 640 639 638 6= 37 636 635 634 633 632 631 630 629 628 627 626 625 624 623 622 621 620 619 = 618 617 616 615 614 613 612 611 610 609 608 607 606 605 604 603 602 601 600= 599 598 597 596 595 594 593 592 591 590 589 588 587 586 585 584 583 582 58= 1 580 579 578 577 576 575 574 573 572 571 570 569 568 567 566 565 564 563 5= 62 561 560 559 558 557 556 555 554 553 552 551 550 549 548 547 546 545 544 = 543 542 541 540 539 538 537 536 535 534 533 532 531 530 529 528 527 526 525= 524 523 522 521 520 519 518 517 516 515 514 513 512 511 510 509 508 507 50= 6 505 504 503 502 501 500 499 498 497 496 495 494 493 492 491 490 489 488 4= 87 486 485 484 483 482 481 480 479 478 477 476 475 474 473 472 471 470 469 = 468 467 466 465 464 463 462 461 460 459 458 457 456 455 454 453 452 451 450= 449 448 447 446 445 444 443 442 441 440 439 438 437 436 435 434 433 432 43= 1 430 429 428 427 426 425 424 423 422 421 420 419 418 417 416 415 414 413 4= 12 411 410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 400 399 398 397 396 395 394 = 393 392 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 380 379 378 377 376 375= 374 373 372 371 370 369 368 367 366 365 364 363 362 361 360 359 358 357 35= 6 355 354 353 352 351 350 349 348 347 346 345 344 343 342 341 340 339 338 3= 37 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 325 324 323 322 321 320 319 = 318 317 316 315 314 313 312 311 310 309 308 307 306 305 304 303 302 301 300= 299 298 297 296 295 294 293 292 291 290 289 288 287 286 285 284 283 282 28= 1 280 279 278 277 276 275 274 273 272 271 270 269 268 267 266 265 264 263 2= 62 261 260 259 258 257 256 255 254 253 252 251 250 249 248 247 246 245 244 = 243 242 241 240 239 238 237 236 235 234 233 232 231 230 229 228 227 226 225= 224 223 222 221 220 219 218 217 216 215 214 213 212 211 210 209 208 207 20= 6 205 204 203 202 201 200 199 198 197 196 195 194 193 192 191 190 189 188 1= 87 186 185 184 183 182 181 180 179 178 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 = 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 156 155 154 153 152 151 150= 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 13= 1 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 1= 12 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 = 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 = 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 = 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 = 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1=20 --- #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 487 if (dumping++) { (kgdb) where #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc015e27f in boot (howto=3D256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:3= 16 #2 0xc015e6a4 in poweroff_wait (junk=3D0xc0268d20, howto=3D-1066573980) at= /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc02146c7 in vm_page_remove (m=3D0xc06d5f64) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pag= e.c:460 #4 0xc0214d48 in vm_page_free_toq (m=3D0xc06d5f64) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_p= age.c:1103 #5 0xc0214a51 in vm_page_alloc (object=3D0xe221dd80, pindex=3D430904, page= _req=3D2) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_page.h:514 #6 0xc0185e9a in allocbuf (bp=3D0xd2874590, size=3D16384) at /usr/src/sys/= kern/vfs_bio.c:2517 #7 0xc0185a7a in getblk (vp=3D0xe2b83c80, blkno=3D107726, size=3D16384, sl= pflag=3D0, slptimeo=3D0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2292 #8 0xc018822e in cluster_rbuild (vp=3D0xe2b83c80, filesize=3D4692049920, l= bn=3D107724, blkno=3D648435200, size=3D16384, run=3D4, fbp=3D0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_cluster.c:400 #9 0xc0187e8f in cluster_read (vp=3D0xe2b83c80, filesize=3D4692049920, lbl= kno=3D107724, size=3D16384, cred=3D0x0, totread=3D4096,=20 seqcount=3D110, bpp=3D0xe1c22c4c) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_cluster.c:228 #10 0xc0201ffa in ffs_read (ap=3D0xe1c22ce4) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_re= adwrite.c:253 #11 0xc01c2868 in nfsrv_read (nfsd=3D0xc6361100, slp=3D0xc6159900, procp=3D= 0xdd1bc400, mrq=3D0xe1c22dfc) at vnode_if.h:334 #12 0xc01daf16 in nfssvc_nfsd (nsd=3D0xe1c22e58, argp=3D0x807e100 "", p=3D0= xdd1bc400) at /usr/src/sys/nfs/nfs_syscalls.c:602 #13 0xc01da871 in nfssvc (p=3D0xdd1bc400, uap=3D0xe1c22f80) at /usr/src/sys= /nfs/nfs_syscalls.c:306 #14 0xc023b6c5 in syscall2 (frame=3D{tf_fs =3D 47, tf_es =3D 47, tf_ds =3D = 47, tf_edi =3D 0, tf_esi =3D 0, tf_ebp =3D -1077936768,=20 tf_isp =3D -507367468, tf_ebx =3D 9, tf_edx =3D 1, tf_ecx =3D -3, tf_= eax =3D 155, tf_trapno =3D 12, tf_err =3D 2, tf_eip =3D 134518528,=20 tf_cs =3D 31, tf_eflags =3D 659, tf_esp =3D -1077937196, tf_ss =3D 47= }) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1175 #15 0xc022f7f5 in Xint0x80_syscall () #16 0x804813e in ?? () And here's dmesg: --- Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Tue Feb 4 10:46:08 CST 2003 root@ops.tamu.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/OPS Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1611826293 Hz CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+ (1611.83-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D 0x662 Stepping =3D 2 Features=3D0x383f9ff AMD Features=3D0xc0480000 real memory =3D 805306368 (786432K bytes) config> q avail memory =3D 779898880 (761620K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc02fe000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc02fe09c. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Using $PIR table, 6 entries at 0xc00fdf10 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on p= ci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 15 pcib2: at device 10.0 on = pci0 pci2: on pcib2 asr0: mem 0xe8000000-0xe9ffffff irq 10 at devic= e 10.1 on pci0 asr0: major=3D154 asr0: ADAPTEC 2400A FW Rev. 370L, 4 channel, 256 CCBs, Protocol I2O fxp0: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem 0xed000000-0= xed01ffff,0xed020000-0xed020fff irq 11 at device 11.0 on=20 pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:95:82:85 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto isab0: at device 17.0 on = pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xe400-0xe40f at device 17.1 on = pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 orm0: ¯¬±z¦Ï¦~

¯¬±z¦Ï¦~


                    ¤@¦|­·¶¶¡B¤GÀsÄË­¸¡B¤T¦Ï¶}®õ¡B
                    ¥|©u¥­¦w¡B¤­ºÖÁ{ªù¡B¤»¤»¤j¶¶¡B
                    ¤C¬P°ª·Ó¡B¤K¤è¨Ó°]¡B¤E¤E¦P¤ß¡B
                    ¤Q¥þ¤Q¬ü¡A¬v¬v±o·N¹L¦n¦~


                          ****³Ì¦³¬¡¤Oªº------
-¤pºµºµ

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 14:14:39 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4500C37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:14:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from hknetmail.com (nweb.hknetmail.com [202.67.240.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0804143F93 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:14:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hmbacha@hknetmail.com) Received: (qmail 32170 invoked by uid 8888); 6 Feb 2003 20:01:56 -0000 Received: from 80.179.100.133 ( [80.179.100.133]) as user hmbacha@nweb.hknet.com by www.hknetmail.com with HTTP; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 04:01:22 +0800 Message-ID: <1044561682.3e42bf1219ff0@www.hknetmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 04:01:22 +0800 From: hmbacha@hknetmail.com To: hmbacha@hknetmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 X-Originating-IP: 80.179.100.133 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ------------------------------------------------- HKNETMAIL.COM Free WEB MAIL Service by HKNET To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 14:33:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E47A37B408 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:33:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FEC43FBF for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:33:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from darrell@google.com) Received: from google.com (vogsphere.corp.google.com [10.3.18.47]) by 216-239-45-4.google.com (8.12.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h16MX03u025503; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:33:00 -0800 Message-ID: <3E42E29C.7040500@google.com> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 14:33:00 -0800 From: Darrell Anderson Reply-To: darrell+freebsd@google.com Organization: Google User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ip_output args changed, added a struct inpcb ... References: <20030206134042.Q63349@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20030206134042.Q63349@hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yup, you can pass NULL as the new ip_output final argument, it's only used for IPSEC. -Darrell Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Darryl ... > > They appear to have changed the args for ip_output, but am not sure what > I need to do to fix it in the netdump code :( > > The new structure appears to be: > > int ip_output(struct mbuf *, > struct mbuf *, struct route *, int, struct ip_moptions *, > struct inpcb *); > > My guess is that I just need to put 0 in for ip_pcb ... ? but I > don't know enough about ip_output to do more then guess ... > > Checking the diffs at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c.diff?r1=1.99.2.33&r2=1.99.2.34&only_with_tag=RELENG_4&f=h > > The addition was made in 1.99.2.34 of the inpcb struct ... > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:54:15 -0400 (AST) > From: Marc G. Fournier > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: ip_output args changed ... ? > > > Can't find a man page for it, so can someone tell me what I need to do to > get this fixed? > > netdump_client.c: In function `netdump_output': > netdump_client.c:162: too few arguments to function `ip_output' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /root/netdump. > jupiter# grep ip_output * > netdump_client.c: error = ip_output(m, NULL, &ro, IP_ALLOWBROADCAST, 0); > > Thanks ... > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 14:47:44 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5629E37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:47:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC7443FB1 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:47:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from don@sandvine.com) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:47:40 -0500 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: ahd1: PCI error interrupt Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:47:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Has anyone else seen this error while coming up on a RELENG-4 system? relevant pciconf output: ahd0@pci3:2:0: class=0x010000 card=0x005f9005 chip=0x801f9005 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 ahd1@pci3:2:1: class=0x010000 card=0x005f9005 chip=0x801f9005 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 This is on a supermicro X5DPR 2x 2.8GHz XEON with an AIC 7802 SCSI. This happened while the machine was coming up. ahd1: PCI error Interrupt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dump Card State Begins <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ahd1: Dumping Card State at program address 0xe Mode 0x33 Card was paused HS_MAILBOX[0x0] INTCTL[0x0] SEQINTSTAT[0x0] SAVED_MODE[0x0] DFFSTAT[0x30] SCSISIGI[0x0] SCSIPHASE[0x0] SCSIBUS[0x0] LASTPHASE[0x1] SCSISEQ0[0x0] SCSISEQ1[0x12] SEQCTL0[0x10] SEQINTCTL[0x0] SEQ_FLAGS[0x0] SEQ_FLAGS2[0x0] SSTAT0[0x0] SSTAT1[0x8] SSTAT2[0x0] SSTAT3[0x0] PERRDIAG[0x0] SIMODE1[0xa4] LQISTAT0[0x0] LQISTAT1[0x0] LQISTAT2[0x0] LQOSTAT0[0x0] LQOSTAT1[0x0] LQOSTAT2[0x0] SCB Count = 16 CMDS_PENDING = 0 LASTSCB 0xffff CURRSCB 0x0 NEXTSCB 0x0 qinstart = 0 qinfifonext = 0 QINFIFO: WAITING_TID_QUEUES: Pending list: Total 0 Kernel Free SCB list: 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Sequencer Complete DMA-inprog list: Sequencer Complete list: Sequencer DMA-Up and Complete list: ahd1: FIFO0 Free, LONGJMP == 0x80ff, SCB 0x0, LJSCB 0xff00 SEQIMODE[0x3f] SEQINTSRC[0x0] DFCNTRL[0x0] DFSTATUS[0x89] SG_CACHE_SHADOW[0x2] SG_STATE[0x0] DFFSXFRCTL[0x0] SOFFCNT[0x0] MDFFSTAT[0x5] SHADDR = 0x00, SHCNT = 0x0 HADDR = 0x00, HCNT = 0x0 CCSGCTL[0x10] ahd1: FIFO1 Free, LONGJMP == 0x80ff, SCB 0x0, LJSCB 0xff00 SEQIMODE[0x3f] SEQINTSRC[0x0] DFCNTRL[0x0] DFSTATUS[0x89] SG_CACHE_SHADOW[0x2] SG_STATE[0x0] DFFSXFRCTL[0x0] SOFFCNT[0x0] MDFFSTAT[0x5] SHADDR = 0x00, SHCNT = 0x0 HADDR = 0x00, HCNT = 0x0 CCSGCTL[0x10] LQIN: 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 ahd1: LQISTATE = 0x0, LQOSTATE = 0x0, OPTIONMODE = 0x42 ahd1: OS_SPACE_CNT = 0x20 MAXCMDCNT = 0x0 SIMODE0[0x6c] CCSCBCTL[0x0] ahd1: REG0 == 0xc169, SINDEX = 0x33, DINDEX = 0x0 ahd1: SCBPTR == 0x1ff, SCB_NEXT == 0xff00, SCB_NEXT2 == 0x0 CDB ff 1 0 0 0 0 STACK: 0x8 0x7 0x6 0x5 0x4 0x3 0x2e 0xe <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Dump Card State Ends >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ahd1: Signaled Target Abort To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 14:51:25 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB5337B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:51:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F4043FA3 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:51:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from don@sandvine.com) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:51:22 -0500 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: Don Bowman , "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: ahd1: PCI error interrupt Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:51:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From: Don Bowman [mailto:don@sandvine.com] ... > > This is on a supermicro X5DPR 2x 2.8GHz XEON with an AIC 7802 SCSI. sorry, make that 7902: ahd0: port 0x4000-0x40ff,0x4400-0x44ff mem 0xfc300000-0xfc301fff irq 22 at device 2.0 on pci3 aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 101-133Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: port 0x4800-0x48ff,0x4c00-0x4cff mem 0xfc302000-0xfc303fff irq 23 at device 2.1 on pci3 aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 101-133Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd0: port 0x4000-0x40ff,0x4400-0x44ff mem 0xfc300000-0xfc301fff irq 22 at device 2.0 on pci3 aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 101-133Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: port 0x4800-0x48ff,0x4c00-0x4cff mem 0xfc302000-0xfc303fff irq 23 at device 2.1 on pci3 aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 101-133Mhz, 512 SCBs To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 16:20:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4353E37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:20:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.itga.com.au (ns1.itga.com.au [202.53.40.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAE543FBF for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:20:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns1.itga.com.au (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h170Ja7w028688; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:19:36 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01171; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:19:35 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200302070019.LAA01171@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Gregory Bond To: Glenn Dawson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 05 Feb 2003 23:13:11 -0800. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 11:19:35 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > ad-hoc. After large amounts of traffic (such as copying a large file) on > the wireless interface, it stops responding. I have a DWL-520, in hostap mode, with WEP. I've not seen this problem ever, but I've not put more than a few 10s of Mb through it at a time. How big is "large" in your case? Sending or receiving? I'll give it a bit more of a beating tonight and see if I get the same problem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 16:21:29 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6EA37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:21:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCDC43F85 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:21:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from netprince@vt.edu) Received: from steiner.cc.vt.edu (IDENT:mirapoint@steiner-lb.cc.vt.edu [10.1.1.14]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h170LQG471227 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:21:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from ben.pfountz.com (Snell.vpec.vt.edu [128.173.89.238]) by steiner.cc.vt.edu (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.2-CR) with ESMTP id AZK93711; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:21:25 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 28857 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 23:53:42 -0000 Received: from bpfountz.princenet (HELO benspiece) (192.168.17.101) by digitalpimp.princenet with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 23:51:12 -0000 Message-ID: <001101c2ce3a$5deaf720$6511a8c0@benspiece> From: "Ben Pfountz" To: "Glenn Dawson" , References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030205231301.035216a0@199.184.188.23> Subject: SPAM: [Sender DNS] Re: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:48:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-BlackHole: Version 1.0.7 by Chris Kennedy (C) 2002 X-BlackHole-Sender: netprince@vt.edu X-BlackHole-Match: Sender DNS X-BlackHole-Info: (invalid domain) netprince@vt.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Glenn, I used the same card for a few weeks trying to figure out that problem. I turned off wep the problem appeared to go away. Then I found that the Belkin F5D6020 uses a prism chipset, and when I use this card I can use WEP without any problems at all. My conclusion was that there is something a little flaky with the DWL-520. Ben ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Dawson" To: Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:13 AM Subject: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear > I have a D-Link DWL-520 in a box running -STABLE that's acting as a > router. I recently switched to using it in hostap mode instead of > ad-hoc. After large amounts of traffic (such as copying a large file) on > the wireless interface, it stops responding. Traffic on the other two > (wired) interfaces continues as normal. The only way I've been able to get > things working again is a reboot. The following error appears in messages: > > wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear > > Is this a known problem with the DWL-520? Anyone else seen the same thing? > > I can provide more info if needed. > > Any help would be much appreciated. > > -Glenn > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 16:21:31 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F52737B405 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:21:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03F743F75 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:21:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from netprince@vt.edu) Received: from vivi.cc.vt.edu (IDENT:mirapoint@vivi-lb.cc.vt.edu [10.1.1.12]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h170LRG427837 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:21:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from ben.pfountz.com (Snell.vpec.vt.edu [128.173.89.238]) by vivi.cc.vt.edu (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.2-CR) with ESMTP id AUG33692; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:21:25 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 28825 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 23:52:32 -0000 Received: from bpfountz.princenet (HELO benspiece) (192.168.17.101) by digitalpimp.princenet with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 23:50:02 -0000 Message-ID: <001001c2ce3a$346b0890$6511a8c0@benspiece> From: "Ben Pfountz" To: "Glenn Dawson" , References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030205231301.035216a0@199.184.188.23> Subject: SPAM: [Sender DNS] Re: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:48:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-BlackHole: Version 1.0.7 by Chris Kennedy (C) 2002 X-BlackHole-Sender: netprince@vt.edu X-BlackHole-Match: Sender DNS X-BlackHole-Info: (invalid domain) netprince@vt.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Glenn, I used the same card for a few weeks trying to figure out that problem. I turned off wep the problem appeared to go away. Then I found that the Belkin F5D6020 uses a prism chipset, and when I use this card I can use WEP without any problems at all. My conclusion was that there is something a little flaky with the DWL-520. Ben ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Dawson" To: Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:13 AM Subject: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear > I have a D-Link DWL-520 in a box running -STABLE that's acting as a > router. I recently switched to using it in hostap mode instead of > ad-hoc. After large amounts of traffic (such as copying a large file) on > the wireless interface, it stops responding. Traffic on the other two > (wired) interfaces continues as normal. The only way I've been able to get > things working again is a reboot. The following error appears in messages: > > wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear > > Is this a known problem with the DWL-520? Anyone else seen the same thing? > > I can provide more info if needed. > > Any help would be much appreciated. > > -Glenn > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 16:37:26 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553C737B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:37:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from e-monitoring.net (isys.e-monitoring.net [209.126.134.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61E543F75 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:37:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn.antimatter.net (064-156-208-042.custnet.redwired.net [64.156.208.42]) by e-monitoring.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h170bJba024024; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:37:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20030206162918.04ae0bf0@mail.antimatter.net> X-Sender: glenn@mail.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 16:36:07 -0800 To: Gregory Bond From: Glenn Dawson Subject: Re: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200302070019.LAA01171@lightning.itga.com.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Large in my case is ~400MB or so. I've noticed the problem when I've tried to copy a CD image from the machine with the DWL-520 to another. I've also seen it happen when I was streaming mp3's to a machine on the wireless network. It would appear to only happen when sending, but I typically don't move much data in the other direction. -Glenn At 04:19 PM 2/6/03, Gregory Bond wrote: > > ad-hoc. After large amounts of traffic (such as copying a large file) on > > the wireless interface, it stops responding. > >I have a DWL-520, in hostap mode, with WEP. I've not seen this problem ever, >but I've not put more than a few 10s of Mb through it at a time. How big is >"large" in your case? Sending or receiving? I'll give it a bit more of a >beating tonight and see if I get the same problem. > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 16:48:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEFD37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:48:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.itga.com.au (ns1.itga.com.au [202.53.40.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6746043F3F for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:48:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns1.itga.com.au (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h170mM7w028841; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:48:22 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03447; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:48:22 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200302070048.LAA03447@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Gregory Bond To: Glenn Dawson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 06 Feb 2003 16:36:07 -0800. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 11:48:22 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Large in my case is ~400MB or so. I've noticed the problem when I've tried > to copy a CD image from the machine with the DWL-520 to another. I've also > seen it happen when I was streaming mp3's to a machine on the wireless > network. It would appear to only happen when sending, but I typically > don't move much data in the other direction. Hmmm, OK, most of my large transfers are the other way (from the WinME client into the BSD box with the 520 card. I'll try doing a large copy the other way and see what happens. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 17:53:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E69C37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:53:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from lazlo.steam.com (lazlo.steam.com [63.109.7.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD3043FCB for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:53:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cliff@steam.com) Received: from steam.com (root@lazlo.steam.com [63.109.7.66]) by lazlo.steam.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h171rATC057907; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:53:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cliff@steam.com) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:53:09 -0800 Subject: Re: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG To: Glenn Dawson , Borja Marcos From: Cliff Skolnick In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20030206102036.04ab48d0@mail.antimatter.net> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I would suggest you both upgrade the firmware on your cards to 1.1.0 / 1.4.9 as it runs hostap mode the best. I had lots of strange problems, especially with wep, without it. Cheers, Cliff wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary 1.01.00, Station 1.04.09 is what you want to see :) On Thursday, Feb 6, 2003, at 10:26 US/Pacific, Glenn Dawson wrote: > Yes, I am using WEP. Forgot to mention that in my first email. Were > you able to find a workaround or a fix of some sort? > > Here's what I have... > > wi0: mem 0xd7801000-0xd7801fff irq 10 at device > 9.0 on pci0 > wi0: 802.11 address: 00:05:5d:f9:c2:3e > wi0: using RF:PRISM2.5 MAC:ISL3874A(Mini-PCI) > wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary 1.00.07, Station 1.03.06 > > -Glenn > > At 08:36 AM 2/6/03, you wrote: >> On Thursday 06 February 2003 08:13, Glenn Dawson wrote: >> > Is this a known problem with the DWL-520? Anyone else seen the same >> > thing? >> > >> > I can provide more info if needed. >> >> Are you using WEP? Something similar happened to me with this >> DWL-650 (The >> Prism2.5 version) >> >> wi0 at port 0x240-0x27f irq 11 slot 0 on pccard0 >> wi0: 802.11 address: 00:05:5d:5c:24:01 >> wi0: using RF:PRISM2.5 MAC:ISL3873 >> wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary 1.00.07, Station 1.03.05 >> >> >> >> >> Borja. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 18:45:37 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328AD37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:45:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from wally.statscout.com (wally.statscout.com [203.39.101.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D9243FA3 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:45:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pak@statscout.com) Received: from speedy.statscout.com (speedy.statscout.com [10.1.1.100]) by wally.statscout.com (8.11.6/8.11.3av) with ESMTP id h172jD226505 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:45:13 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pak@statscout.com) Received: from speedy.statscout.com (localhost.statscout.com [127.0.0.1]) by speedy.statscout.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h172jFAu001495 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:45:15 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pak@speedy.statscout.com) Received: (from pak@localhost) by speedy.statscout.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h172jFON001494 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:45:15 +1000 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Paul Koch Organization: Statscout To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Invalid ps start time values for kernel processes ? Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:45:14 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200302071245.14865.paul.koch@statscout.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The ps output value for STARTED appears to be incorrect for kernel started processes. I found this while writing a tiny ps for our freebsd based network appliance. The start time returned from /proc/{normal pid}/status (man procfs) appears to be in=20 UTC while the start time for a kernel process appears to be localtime (or the other way round). This gave me wild values. Is this correct behaviour ? $ uname -a FreeBSD speedy.statscout.com 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #0:=20 Tue Dec 17 08:22:00 EST 2002 root@speedy.statscout.com:/usr/src/sys/comp= ile/BSD47 i386 $ date Fri Feb 7 12:31:33 EST 2003 $ uptime 12:31PM up 3:56, 4 users, load averages: 0.15, 0.17, 0.09 My timezone is +10hours. $ ps -aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND root 193 1.0 11.3 29936 14308 ?? Ss 8:35AM 2:56.69 /usr/X11R6= /bin/XFree86 -auth /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/authdir/authfiles/A:0-vZLPV9 root 1 0.0 0.1 552 72 ?? ILs 6:35PM 0:00.01 /sbin/init = -- root 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? DL 6:35PM 0:03.44 (pagedaemo= n) root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? DL 6:35PM 0:00.78 (vmdaemon) root 4 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? DL 6:35PM 0:00.10 (bufdaemon= ) root 5 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? DL 6:35PM 0:00.09 (vnlru) root 6 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?? DL 6:35PM 0:01.34 (syncer) root 23 0.0 0.0 212 0 ?? IWs - 0:00.00 adjkerntz -= i root 71 0.0 0.2 944 248 ?? Ss 8:35AM 0:00.08 /usr/sbin/s= yslogd -s daemon 74 0.0 0.0 944 0 ?? IWs - 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/p= ortmap root 76 0.0 0.0 500 0 ?? IWs - 0:00.00 mountd -r root 79 0.0 0.0 368 0 ?? IWs - 0:00.00 nfsd: maste= r (nfsd) root 81 0.0 0.0 360 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 nfsd: serve= r (nfsd) root 82 0.0 0.0 360 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 nfsd: serve= r (nfsd) root 83 0.0 0.0 360 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 nfsd: serve= r (nfsd) root 84 0.0 0.0 360 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 nfsd: serve= r (nfsd) root 86 0.0 0.0 263084 0 ?? IWs - 0:00.00 rpc.statd root 91 0.0 0.0 212 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 nfsiod -n 4 root 92 0.0 0.0 212 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 nfsiod -n 4 root 93 0.0 0.0 212 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 nfsiod -n 4 root 94 0.0 0.0 212 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 nfsiod -n 4 root 100 0.0 0.0 1076 0 ?? IWs - 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/i= netd -wW root 102 0.0 0.2 996 192 ?? Is 8:35AM 0:00.05 /usr/sbin/c= ron root 105 0.0 0.0 968 0 ?? IWs - 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/l= pd root 107 0.0 0.1 968 100 ?? S 8:35AM 0:00.03 /usr/sbin/l= pd root 108 0.0 0.0 2740 0 ?? IWs - 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/s= shd root 110 0.0 0.1 916 88 ?? Ss 8:35AM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/u= sbd root 113 0.0 0.4 2660 460 ?? Ss 8:35AM 0:00.51 sendmail: a= ccepting connections (sendmail) smmsp 116 0.0 0.4 2660 440 ?? Is 8:35AM 0:00.01 sendmail: Q= ueue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) root 133 0.0 0.1 912 72 ?? Is 8:35AM 0:03.49 moused -p /= dev/psm0 -t auto root 146 0.0 0.2 2128 220 ?? Ss 8:35AM 0:00.46 /usr/local/= sbin/httpd www 162 0.0 0.0 2128 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 /usr/local/= sbin/httpd www 163 0.0 0.0 2152 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 /usr/local/= sbin/httpd www 164 0.0 0.0 2152 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 /usr/local/= sbin/httpd www 165 0.0 0.0 2152 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 /usr/local/= sbin/httpd www 166 0.0 0.0 2188 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 /usr/local/= sbin/httpd root 179 0.0 0.0 3408 0 con- IW+ - 0:00.00 /usr/local/= sbin/snmpd root 182 0.0 0.0 948 0 v0 IWs+ - 0:00.00 /usr/libexe= c/getty Pc ttyv0 root 183 0.0 0.0 948 0 v1 IWs+ - 0:00.00 /usr/libexe= c/getty Pc ttyv1 root 184 0.0 0.0 948 0 v2 IWs+ - 0:00.00 /usr/libexe= c/getty Pc ttyv2 root 185 0.0 0.0 948 0 v3 IWs+ - 0:00.00 /usr/libexe= c/getty Pc ttyv3 root 186 0.0 0.0 948 0 v4 IWs+ - 0:00.00 /usr/libexe= c/getty Pc ttyv4 etc...... Paul Koch (CTO Statscout Pty Ltd) Email: paul.koch@statscout.com Phone: +61 7 32117115 Fax: +61 7 32117829 7th Floor, 300 Adelaide St, Brisbane, Australia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 19:47:29 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A0D37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:47:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E7F43F85 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:47:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 593BFA80F; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:47:26 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557845425; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:47:26 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:47:26 +1100 (EST) From: Andrew To: Glenn Dawson Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030205231301.035216a0@199.184.188.23> Message-ID: <20030207144633.E52845-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Glenn Dawson wrote: > wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear > > Is this a known problem with the DWL-520? Anyone else seen the same thing? I get the same problem with a Linksys WMP11. I tried upgrading the firmware to see if that helped (had to put the card in a windows box to do it) and now it doesn't seem to work at all. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 19:48: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB2F37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:48:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1007143F85 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:48:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A41DAA819; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:48:04 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19535430; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:48:04 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:48:04 +1100 (EST) From: Andrew To: Glenn Dawson Cc: Borja Marcos , Subject: Re: wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20030206102036.04ab48d0@mail.antimatter.net> Message-ID: <20030207144744.L52845-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Glenn Dawson wrote: > Yes, I am using WEP. Forgot to mention that in my first email. Were you I wasn't using WEP so that might not be related. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 21:49:21 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFFA37B40B for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 21:49:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ops.tamu.edu (ops.tamu.edu [165.91.250.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B81043FDF for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 21:49:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nipsy@ops.tamu.edu) Received: from nipsy by ops.tamu.edu with local (Exim 4.10) id 18h1O2-000CF9-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 23:49:18 -0600 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:49:18 -0600 From: Mark Nipper To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash Message-ID: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In trying to make my FreeBSD NFS server crash by running three tcpdump's and one trafshow via SSH from a Linux machine, I received and interesting error and crash on one of the tcpdump SSH sessions: --- corrupted mac on input Looking around, I noticed only a handful of reports on this. I have an fxp interface: --- fxp0: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem 0xed000000-0xed01ffff,0xed020000-0xed020fff irq 11 at device 11.0 on pci0 and have been seeing other strange crashes as I've mentioned in a couple of previous posts. I do not have DEVICE_POLLING turned on currently, but I think I'm going to enable it along with bumping up my HZ value, just to see if that changes anything... Anyway, any ideas on the SSH error? -- Mark Nipper e-contacts: Computing and Information Services nipsy@tamu.edu Texas A&M University http://ops.tamu.edu/nipsy/ College Station, TX 77843-3142 AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617 (979)575-3193 MSN: nipsy@tamu.edu -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GG/IT d- s++:+ a-- C++$ UBL+++$ P--->+++ L+++$ E--- W++ N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP++(+) t 5 X R tv b+++ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**) ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---begin random quote of the moment--- If you're not on somebody's shit list, you're not doing anything worthwhile. ----end random quote of the moment---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 23: 2: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E14837B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:02:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-51-184.zoominternet.net [24.154.51.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7174A43FD7 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:02:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from behanna@topperwein.dyndns.org) Received: from topperwein.pennasoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1772J9K023090 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 02:02:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from behanna@topperwein.dyndns.org) Received: (from behanna@localhost) by topperwein.pennasoft.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h1772Ept023089 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 02:02:14 -0500 (EST) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: behanna@zbzoom.net To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: mpd 3.11 problems? Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 02:02:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302070202.14411.behanna@zbzoom.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is anyone else seeing problems using mpd-3.11 to do PPTP to a Windows RAS box? I just had the frustrating experience of having my configuration work with 3.10, upgrade to 3.11 and the tunnel endpoints get the expected addresses, but cannot be pinged and no packets flow, downgrade back to 3.10, and everything works again. -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (Remove "bogus" before responding.) behanna@bogus.zbzoom.net Turning coffee into software since 1990. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 6 23:56: 8 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DAE37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:56:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8860F43FCB for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:56:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 518FC5371; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:56:03 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Problems with pam_ssh(8) and ssh-agent(1) after the OpenSSH upgrade From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 08:56:02 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As some of you have already noticed and reported, ssh-agent doesn't work quite right when spawned by pam_ssh after the OpenSSH upgrade earlier this week. This is caused by two factors. The first factor is that ssh-agent has become quite pedantic about its operating conditions, in an effort to prevent potential security problems. The second factor is that the credential manipulations pam_ssh does before spawning the agent are slightly wrong - not sufficiently wrong to pose a serious threat, but sufficiently wrong to make ssh-agent suspicious. In addition to that, there seems to be a problem with the credential manipulation functions I wrote for OpenPAM (which are also used by pam_ssh in -STABLE) which would cause pam_ssh to fail when invoked by a privsep-enabled sshd. This doesn't seem to be much of a problem as few or no users have pam_ssh in their sshd policy (it doesn't make much sense, does it?). I knew about the first problem before I upgraded OpenSSH in -STABLE, because it had been reported by -CURRENT users and discussed on one of the OpenSSH developer mailing lists. I discovered the second problem while trying out potential workarounds for the first one. I am working on resolving both issues, and hope to have a solution ready during the weekend. I would also like to apologize for the inconvenience caused by my forgetfulness. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 5:49:59 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320FD37B406 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 05:49:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8801E43F3F for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 05:49:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h17DnedK076100 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:49:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h17Dnefo076099; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:49:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:49:40 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200302071349.h17Dnefo076099@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Invalid ps start time values for kernel processes ? In-Reply-To: <200302071245.14865.paul.koch@statscout.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.7-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Paul Koch wrote: > The ps output value for STARTED appears to be incorrect for > kernel started processes. I found this while writing a tiny ps > for our freebsd based network appliance. The start time returned > from /proc/{normal pid}/status (man procfs) appears to be in > UTC while the start time for a kernel process appears to be > localtime (or the other way round). This gave me wild values. > Is this correct behaviour ? Is your CMOS clock running with local time, rather than UTC? (i.e. does the file /etc/wall_cmos_clock exist?) In that case, the kernel will start up with the wrong time information, because it doesn't know the timezone you're in (the kernel always uses UTC internally). This information is corrected by the adjkerntz program in the early stages of the boot process. However, the kernel processes start before that correction happens. If you were living east of Greenwich (i.e. positive timezone offset), the start time values would even be in the future. If FreeBSD is the only operating system on that machine, I suggest that you run the CMOS clock with UTC, avoiding the problem alltogether. Of course, you can also just ignore the wrong start values. They should not cause any harm. I don't think there is an easy way to fix the problem. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 6:49:30 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A209F37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:49:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5921C43FBF for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:49:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 7B057536E; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:49:24 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with pam_ssh(8) and ssh-agent(1) after the OpenSSH upgrade From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:49:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2003 08:56:02 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > As some of you have already noticed and reported, ssh-agent doesn't > work quite right when spawned by pam_ssh after the OpenSSH upgrade > earlier this week. Could somebody experiencing this problem please test the following patch: Index: ssh-agent.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/crypto/openssh/ssh-agent.c,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -u -r1.16 ssh-agent.c --- ssh-agent.c 29 Oct 2002 10:16:02 -0000 1.16 +++ ssh-agent.c 7 Feb 2003 07:09:47 -0000 @@ -955,6 +955,7 @@ /* drop */ setegid(getgid()); setgid(getgid()); + setuid(geteuid()); SSLeay_add_all_algorithms(); After applying it, rebuild and reinstall ssh-agent as follows: # cd /usr/src/secure/usr.bin/ssh-agent # make && make install DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 6:55:43 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AA737B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:55:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4371343F93 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 06:55:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 6FD405371; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:55:40 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Mark Nipper Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:55:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> (Mark Nipper's message of "Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:49:18 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Nipper writes: > Anyway, any ideas on the SSH error? Sure, if you tell me what the error is. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 8:14: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC4937B7A2 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:13:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ops.tamu.edu (ops.tamu.edu [165.91.250.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868E543FCB for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:13:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nipsy@ops.tamu.edu) Received: from nipsy by ops.tamu.edu with local (Exim 4.10) id 18hB8J-000JW7-00; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 10:13:43 -0600 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:13:43 -0600 From: Mark Nipper To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash Message-ID: <20030207161343.GB44046@ops.tamu.edu> References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207145905.GA44046@ops.tamu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 04:36:44PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Mark Nipper writes: > > The error was: > > --- > > corrupted mac on input > > > > as I said in my original post. > > You didn't say anything about what program prints the error message, > or under what conditions. Neither did you explain what you meant by > "crash", which I normally take to mean "the machine rebooted". I also > don't understand what your brand of network interface has to do with > any of this. > > To summarize, give more details and take care not to mix up unrelated > matters. Well, the error was nothing more than what I've already said, and this appeared as the last bit of output in an ssh session to another host, afterwards I only had my local prompt. I was running tcpdump at the time on the remote side, so it was a pretty active connection. Frankly, I'm not sure what the effect this has when running a traffic analysis of any kind remotely, but obviously it generates more traffic, which was the whole reason I was doing it in the first place! I mention the fxp interface, because people have mentioned some weird crashes/reboots recently on the list and I've been experiencing them myself on the remote machine to which the ssh session died in the first place. The post of it on this list had mentioned heavy use of tcpdump and trafshow, just anything to put the card in promiscuous mode. I don't even really have any hard data to think it's related, but I thought I'd mention it at the very lest. Searching deja.com, I found a few scant references to the "corrupted mac" error and OpenSSH, but it all seemed to be ~3.[01]" era information for OpenSSH and certainly nothing as recent as OpenSSH-3.5p1. So, while I apologize for the lack of real data, it doesn't seem to be a common problem, and I'm not entirely sure that the problems are in fact, unrelated. I'm beginning to think my hardware just needs to be thrown out the window and replaced in full. -- Mark Nipper e-contacts: Computing and Information Services nipsy@tamu.edu Texas A&M University http://ops.tamu.edu/nipsy/ College Station, TX 77843-3142 AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617 (979)575-3193 MSN: nipsy@tamu.edu -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GG/IT d- s++:+ a-- C++$ UBL+++$ P--->+++ L+++$ E--- W++ N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP++(+) t 5 X R tv b+++ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**) ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---begin random quote of the moment--- "Linux does not solve all the problems. But we are working on it." -- Alan Cox ----end random quote of the moment---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 8:37:20 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AA137B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:37:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from dc-mx02.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx02.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E42B43FB1 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:37:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from duhring@charter.net) Received: from [24.217.76.33] (HELO dave.uhring.com) by dc-mx02.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 43730838; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 11:37:17 -0500 From: Dave Uhring To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Mark Nipper Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:37:14 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: stable@freebsd.org References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302071037.14164.duhring@charter.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday 07 February 2003 08:55 am, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Mark Nipper writes: > > Anyway, any ideas on the SSH error? > > Sure, if you tell me what the error is. Before I replaced the binaries with those from the openssh-3.5p1 package and disabled PAM this was what my machine reported: Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: pam_start: malloc failed for pam_conv Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: fatal: PAM: initialisation failed To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 8:53:47 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE95B37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:53:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout3-eri1.midsouth.rr.com (mailout3-eri1.midsouth.rr.com [24.165.200.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD61543F85 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:53:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from synkrat@midsouth.rr.com) Received: from ghidra.manref.net (desuba@cpe-024-165-148-130.midsouth.rr.com [24.165.148.130]) by mailout3-eri1.midsouth.rr.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h17GrfS25910; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:53:41 -0600 (CST) From: synkrat Reply-To: synkrat@midsouth.rr.com To: Dave Uhring Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:52:29 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> <200302071037.14164.duhring@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <200302071037.14164.duhring@charter.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302071052.29687.synkrat@midsouth.rr.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri February 7 2003 04:37 pm, Dave Uhring wrote: > On Friday 07 February 2003 08:55 am, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Mark Nipper writes: > > > Anyway, any ideas on the SSH error? > > > > Sure, if you tell me what the error is. > > Before I replaced the binaries with those from the openssh-3.5p1 package > and disabled PAM this was what my machine reported: > > Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: pam_start: malloc failed for pam_conv > Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: fatal: PAM: initialisation failed > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message Your troubles can be cured by updating src and rebuilding openssh. [freebsd] / src / crypto / openssh Revision 1.5 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Fri Jan 31 11:08:07 2003 UTC (7 days, 5 hours ago) by des Branch: MAIN CVS Tags: HEAD Changes since 1.4: +19 -0 lines Diff to previous 1.4 (colored) Fix keyboard-interactive authentication for ssh1. The problem was twofold: - The PAM kbdint device sometimes doesn't know authentication succeeded until you re-query it. The ssh1 kbdint code would never re-query the device, so authentication would always fail. This patch has been submitted to the OpenSSH developers. - The monitor code for PAM sometimes forgot to tell the monitor that authentication had succeeded. This caused the monitor to veto the privsep child's decision to allow the connection. These patches have been tested with OpenSSH clients on -STABLE, NetBSD and Linux, and with ssh.com's ssh1 on Solaris. Sponsored by: DARPA, NAI Labs To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 9:35: 8 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4554437B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 09:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from shaw.ca (syr-24-24-18-161.twcny.rr.com [24.24.18.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DACB243FCB for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 09:35:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from readershiplbyv@shaw.ca) Message-ID: <000201d8ca73$abb73428$57371337@edjoyxp.hfh> From: To: Subject: refinance now Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 23:01:12 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

REFINANCE NOW at super low interest rates

MortgageTimes Broker and Lender Network offers the lowest rates and best service in the industry.

Whether you are looking for a new mortgage, refinance, home equity loan or debt consolidation loan, let MortgageTimes Broker or a Lender show you how to find a loan that's right for you!

Our product offerings include:
  • First mortgages (fixed and variable)
  • Equity lines of credit
  • Second Mortgages
  • Go there now!
Our services include:
  • New mortgages
  • Home equity loans
  • Refinances
  • Debt consolidation loans
Places are limited to keep quality HIGH and rates LOW, so don't delay.
Following this link will change your financial future!

MortgageTimes goal is to provide, personalized service with the fastest loan process at the lowest cost to you.

MortgageTimes is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
We offer full-service mortgage loans, providing fast, efficient service.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 9:50:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E228337B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 09:50:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EE643F3F for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 09:50:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 80696536E; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:50:43 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Dave Uhring Cc: Mark Nipper , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:50:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200302071037.14164.duhring@charter.net> (Dave Uhring's message of "Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:37:14 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> <200302071037.14164.duhring@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dave Uhring writes: > Before I replaced the binaries with those from the openssh-3.5p1 package and > disabled PAM this was what my machine reported: > > Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: pam_start: malloc failed for pam_conv > Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: fatal: PAM: initialisation failed This was fixed very shortly after the upgrade. There's still no substitute for checking the lists before posting complaints... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 9:54:39 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33B837B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 09:54:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ops.tamu.edu (ops.tamu.edu [165.91.250.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526A343F75 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 09:54:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nipsy@ops.tamu.edu) Received: from nipsy by ops.tamu.edu with local (Exim 4.10) id 18hChw-0001U8-00; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 11:54:36 -0600 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:54:36 -0600 From: Mark Nipper To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash Message-ID: <20030207175436.GE44046@ops.tamu.edu> References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> <200302071037.14164.duhring@charter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:50:42PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Dave Uhring writes: > > Before I replaced the binaries with those from the openssh-3.5p1 package and > > disabled PAM this was what my machine reported: > > > > Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: pam_start: malloc failed for pam_conv > > Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: fatal: PAM: initialisation failed > > This was fixed very shortly after the upgrade. There's still no > substitute for checking the lists before posting complaints... This isn't the original problem I reported in this thread. I don't think it's even related to the "corrupted MAC on input" error. -- Mark Nipper e-contacts: Computing and Information Services nipsy@tamu.edu Texas A&M University http://ops.tamu.edu/nipsy/ College Station, TX 77843-3142 AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617 (979)575-3193 MSN: nipsy@tamu.edu -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GG/IT d- s++:+ a-- C++$ UBL+++$ P--->+++ L+++$ E--- W++ N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP++(+) t 5 X R tv b+++ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**) ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---begin random quote of the moment--- "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less." -- author of the Mutt e-mail client ----end random quote of the moment---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 10: 9:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A380A37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:09:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F7543F93 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:09:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id EA7ED536E; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 19:09:49 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Mark Nipper Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:09:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030207161343.GB44046@ops.tamu.edu> (Mark Nipper's message of "Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:13:43 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207145905.GA44046@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207161343.GB44046@ops.tamu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You could at least have reproduced the error message verbatim ("Corrupted MAC on input."), I would have saved some time trying to figure out where it came from. In any case, the message indicates data corruption in the TCP connection which has gone undetected by the NIC and the network stack. It's a very unlikely occurrence, but not impossible. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 10:13:20 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CBB37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:13:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8658943F75 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:13:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from duhring@charter.net) Received: from [24.217.76.33] (HELO dave.uhring.com) by dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 45010973; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:13:16 -0500 From: Dave Uhring To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:13:15 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Mark Nipper , stable@freebsd.org References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> <200302071037.14164.duhring@charter.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302071213.15732.duhring@charter.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday 07 February 2003 11:50 am, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Dave Uhring writes: > > Before I replaced the binaries with those from the openssh-3.5p1 package > > and disabled PAM this was what my machine reported: > > > > Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: pam_start: malloc failed for pam_conv > > Feb 6 06:59:43 willy sshd[139]: fatal: PAM: initialisation failed > > This was fixed very shortly after the upgrade. There's still no > substitute for checking the lists before posting complaints... That was NOT a complaint. You asked for information regarding sshd on -STABLE and I was kind enough to provide you with some of that information. FOAD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 10:41:46 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2021237B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A29343F75 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:41:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk) Received: from pfrench by mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 18hDQR-000NWo-00; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:40:35 +0000 To: des@ofug.org, nipsy@tamu.edu Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:40:35 +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > You could at least have reproduced the error message verbatim > ("Corrupted MAC on input."), I would have saved some time trying to > figure out where it came from. This very interesting - I see these all the time. To the point where an ssh session to the server is almost unusable at certain times of the day! I suspect hardware problems and am going to change the hardware for this reason. If it turns out to be software, however, that would be very interesting. I've seen this at least 6 times today already. Next time it happens I will copy it to the list. -pcf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 10:47:55 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B5537B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADDE43FD7 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:47:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id CBFA8536E; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 19:47:51 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Mark Nipper Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:47:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:09:49 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207145905.GA44046@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207161343.GB44046@ops.tamu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > You could at least have reproduced the error message verbatim > ("Corrupted MAC on input."), I would have saved some time trying to > figure out where it came from. I apologize for the tone of this message. I've spent the day getting angrier and angrier at OpenSSH and pam_ssh and unfairly let this anger leak out into my email. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 11:53: 9 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839E237B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:53:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mutare.noc.clara.net (mutare.noc.clara.net [195.8.70.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BAF43FA3 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:53:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ollie@mutare.noc.clara.net) Received: from ollie by mutare.noc.clara.net with local (Exim 4.04) id 18hEYZ-0004KF-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:53:03 +0000 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 19:53:03 +0000 From: Ollie Cook To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Panic during boot under 4.7-STABLE in sbp_get_text_leaf (firewire) Message-ID: <20030207195303.GD15853@mutare.noc.clara.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE i386 X-NCC-RegID: uk.claranet Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I am having trouble with firewire on my new laptop (Dell X200). The unit includes an external CD/DVD drive unit connected via firewire. The laptop boots fine with a 4.7-STABLE GENERIC kernel (cvsup'd this afternoon appx 6pm GMT) and also with a GENERIC kernel plus "device firewire". However, when I include "device sbp", to be able to use the external CD drive, in the kernel config, the laptop panics during boot. The lines leading up to the panic are (transcripted, so typos may be present): firewire0: New S400 device ID:00065b80030f070f firewire0: Device SBP-II The instruction pointer where the crash occurs is 0xc01c1896 which is in sbp_get_text_leaf. su-2.05b# nm /kernel|sort|grep c01c18 c01c1824 t sbp_get_text_leaf c01c18e8 t sbp_probe_lun I have version 1.5.2.10 of src/dev/firewire/sbp.c which contains these functions. I recompiled with "options DDB" so was able to get this stack trace from the kernel debugger (again transcripted so please forgive any typos): sbp_get_text_leaf sbp_probe_lun sbp_probe_target sbp_post_explore fw_attach_dev fw_bus_explore fw_bus_explore_callback fw_xfer_done fw_rcv fwohci_arcv fwohci_intr_body fwochi_intr I was unable to induce a coredump using 'panic' in the kernel debugger (is it possible to get a core dump during boot in this way?). I think I've reached the end of the line in terms of my knowledge and finding out what is causing this panic. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I can try next? I have included the dmesg output from a successful boot with firewire enabled but no sbp, in case that is useful. Thanks, Ollie -- dmesg output -- Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 7 18:31:54 GMT 2003 root@laptop.olliecook.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 800MHz (797.35-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 393740288 (384512K bytes) avail memory = 376844288 (368012K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel.works" at 0xc0581000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 9 entries at 0xc00fdf30 apm0: on motherboard apm0: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe007ffff,0xe80 00000-0xefffffff irq 10 at device 2.0 on pci0 agp0: detected 8060k stolen memory agp0: aperture size is 128M pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x3577) at 2.1 uhci0: port 0x8c80-0x8c9f irq 10 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x8ca0-0x8cbf irq 11 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x8cc0-0x8cdf irq 11 at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib1 pci_cfgintr_linked: linked (60) to hard-routed irq 10 pci_cfgintr: 2:3 INTA routed to irq 10 pcic0: irq 10 at device 3.0 on pci2 pcic0: PCI Memory allocated: 0x88000000 pccard0: on pcic0 fwohci0: vendor=1180, dev=551 fwohci0: <1394 Open Host Controller Interface> mem 0xe0200000-0xe02007ff irq 11 at device 3.1 on pci2 fwohci0: PCI bus latency was changing to 250. fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channel is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:06:5b:80:01:0f:73:d3 fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xa000-0xa07f mem 0xe0200800-0xe020 087f irq 11 at device 5.0 on pci2 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:06:5b:89:83:f0 miibus0: on xl0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x9000-0x900f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0 x7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2483) at 31.3 irq 10 pcm0: port 0x80c0-0x80ff,0x8400-0x84ff irq 10 at device 3 1.5 on pci0 pcm0: pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2486) at 31.6 irq 10 orm0: Ó âàñ íåò çàêàçîâ

Ó âàñ íåò çàêàçîâ? Ïåðåñòàëè çâîíèòü êëèåíòû? Î Âàøèõ óñëóãàõ íèêòî íå çíàåò? Íå õâàòàåò äåíåã íà ïðîâåäåíèå øèðîêîìàñøòàáíîé ðåêëàìû?

Âñå ýòè ïðîáëåìû ìû ñìîæåì ðåøèòü âñåãî çà 300$. Çà ýòè äåíüãè ó Âàñ ïîÿâèòüñÿ âîçìîæíîñòü ðàçîñëàòü ñâîå ñîîáùåíèå íà 3.800.000 ïîëó÷àòåëåé! Òîëüêî âäóìàéòåñü â ýòó öèôðó! Ðàññûëêà äëèòüñÿ â òå÷åíèè 1 äíÿ.  áàçó E-Mail àäðåñîâ ïîïàëè íå òîëüêî îðãàíèçàöèè è ïðåäïðèÿòèÿ Ìîñêâû è Ðîññèè, íî è âñå ÷àñòíûå ëèöà. Âñÿ áàçà íà 100% âåðèôèöèðîâàííàÿ è ìû äàåì ãàðàíòèþ íà å¸ êà÷åñòâî!

ÏËÞÑ! Çàêàçàâ ó íàñ E-Mail ðàññûëêó ñåé÷àñ, Âû ñìîæåòå âîñïîëüçîâàòüñÿ íàøåé íàêîïèòåëüíîé ñèñòåìîé (ïîäðîáíîñòè ïðè çàêàçå).

Çàêàçàòü ðàññûëêó Âû ñìîæåòå çäåñü.

×òîáû óäàëèòü ñâîé E-Mail, íàæìèòå çäåñü.

(ñ) 2003 DEMETRIUS Software.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 13:11:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2B237B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ops.tamu.edu (ops.tamu.edu [165.91.250.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A00443FBF for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:11:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nipsy@ops.tamu.edu) Received: from nipsy by ops.tamu.edu with local (Exim 4.10) id 18hFml-000GIM-00; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:11:47 -0600 Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:11:47 -0600 From: Mark Nipper To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash Message-ID: <20030207211147.GB62439@ops.tamu.edu> References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207145905.GA44046@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207161343.GB44046@ops.tamu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:09:49PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > In any case, the message indicates data corruption in the TCP > connection which has gone undetected by the NIC and the network stack. > It's a very unlikely occurrence, but not impossible. Does this imply hardware failure of some kind? The reason I have to ask of course is that since I have been experiencing actual crashes on this machine (and I mean real crashes, not just OpenSSH processes dying on me) and this machines almost sole purpose in life is as an NFS server, could the fxp card be causing more trouble than just a randomly bizarre error message from OpenSSH? -- Mark Nipper e-contacts: Computing and Information Services nipsy@tamu.edu Texas A&M University http://ops.tamu.edu/nipsy/ College Station, TX 77843-3142 AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617 (979)575-3193 MSN: nipsy@tamu.edu -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GG/IT d- s++:+ a-- C++$ UBL+++$ P--->+++ L+++$ E--- W++ N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP++(+) t 5 X R tv b+++ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**) ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---begin random quote of the moment--- "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989 ----end random quote of the moment---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 14:48:16 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5094737B401; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:48:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E67443F93; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:48:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from nbs.imp.ch (nbs.imp.ch [157.161.4.7]) by mail.imp.ch (8.12.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h17Mm4I2065140; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:48:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Martin.Blapp@imp.ch) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:48:04 +0100 From: Martin Blapp To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: HEADS UP: Broken if_dc NICs with MACs like 08:08[...] or 00:00[...] Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, Many if_dc cards are still broken in RELENG_4. Can you please try this diff if you own such a broken card ? If you have a Conexant LANfinity MiniPCI 10/100BaseTX card, I'd like to have feedback if full duplex mode works now too. Thank you very much for your tests. I'd like to see all these DEC/Intel 21143 clone cards fixed for 4.8R. Martin ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://people.freebsd.org/~mbr/patches/if_dc.c-MFC.diff MFC Rev. 1.80, 1.81 Dynamically configure the width of the srom. This code comes from OpenBSD who got the code (or the idea) from the NetBSD tlp driver. MFC Rev. 1.67 Fix Conexant chips which always reports carrier lost on full duplex mode. Index: if_dc.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/pci/if_dc.c,v retrieving revision 1.9.2.38 diff -u -r1.9.2.38 if_dc.c --- if_dc.c 5 Feb 2003 22:10:04 -0000 1.9.2.38 +++ if_dc.c 7 Feb 2003 19:01:18 -0000 @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ static void dc_eeprom_getword __P((struct dc_softc *, int, u_int16_t *)); static void dc_eeprom_getword_pnic __P((struct dc_softc *, int, u_int16_t *)); +static void dc_eeprom_width __P((struct dc_softc *)); static void dc_read_eeprom __P((struct dc_softc *, caddr_t, int, int, int)); @@ -250,6 +251,7 @@ static int dc_list_rx_init __P((struct dc_softc *)); static int dc_list_tx_init __P((struct dc_softc *)); +static void dc_read_srom __P((struct dc_softc *, int)); static void dc_parse_21143_srom __P((struct dc_softc *)); static void dc_decode_leaf_sia __P((struct dc_softc *, struct dc_eblock_sia *)); @@ -324,6 +326,70 @@ CSR_READ_4(sc, DC_BUSCTL); } +static void dc_eeprom_width(sc) + struct dc_softc *sc; +{ + int i; + + /* Force EEPROM to idle state. */ + dc_eeprom_idle(sc); + + /* Enter EEPROM access mode. */ + CSR_WRITE_4(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EESEL); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_SETBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_ROMCTL_READ); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_CLRBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CLK); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_SETBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CS); + dc_delay(sc); + + for (i = 3; i--;) { + if (6 & (1 << i)) + DC_SETBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_DATAIN); + else + DC_CLRBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_DATAIN); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_SETBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CLK); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_CLRBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CLK); + dc_delay(sc); + } + + for (i = 1; i <= 12; i++) { + DC_SETBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CLK); + dc_delay(sc); + if (!(CSR_READ_4(sc, DC_SIO) & DC_SIO_EE_DATAOUT)) { + DC_CLRBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CLK); + dc_delay(sc); + break; + } + DC_CLRBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CLK); + dc_delay(sc); + } + + /* Turn off EEPROM access mode. */ + dc_eeprom_idle(sc); + + if (i < 4 || i > 12) + sc->dc_romwidth = 6; + else + sc->dc_romwidth = i; + + /* Enter EEPROM access mode. */ + CSR_WRITE_4(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EESEL); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_SETBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_ROMCTL_READ); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_CLRBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CLK); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_SETBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CS); + dc_delay(sc); + + /* Turn off EEPROM access mode. */ + dc_eeprom_idle(sc); +} + static void dc_eeprom_idle(sc) struct dc_softc *sc; { @@ -363,21 +429,24 @@ { register int d, i; - /* - * The AN985 has a 93C66 EEPROM on it instead of - * a 93C46. It uses a different bit sequence for - * specifying the "read" opcode. - */ - if (DC_IS_CENTAUR(sc) || DC_IS_CONEXANT(sc)) - d = addr | (DC_EECMD_READ << 2); - else - d = addr | DC_EECMD_READ; + d = DC_EECMD_READ >> 6; + for (i = 3; i--; ) { + if (d & (1 << i)) + DC_SETBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_DATAIN); + else + DC_CLRBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_DATAIN); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_SETBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CLK); + dc_delay(sc); + DC_CLRBIT(sc, DC_SIO, DC_SIO_EE_CLK); + dc_delay(sc); + } /* * Feed in each bit and strobe the clock. */ - for (i = 0x400; i; i >>= 1) { - if (d & i) { + for (i = sc->dc_romwidth; i--;) { + if (addr & (1 << i)) { SIO_SET(DC_SIO_EE_DATAIN); } else { SIO_CLR(DC_SIO_EE_DATAIN); @@ -1572,6 +1641,7 @@ m->dc_next = sc->dc_mi; sc->dc_mi = m; + free(sc->dc_srom, M_DEVBUF); sc->dc_pmode = DC_PMODE_SIA; @@ -1630,6 +1700,17 @@ return; } +static void dc_read_srom(sc, bits) + struct dc_softc *sc; + int bits; +{ + int size; + + size = 2 << bits; + sc->dc_srom = malloc(size, M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT); + dc_read_eeprom(sc, (caddr_t)sc->dc_srom, 0, (size / 2), 0); +} + static void dc_parse_21143_srom(sc) struct dc_softc *sc; { @@ -1753,13 +1834,17 @@ sc->dc_info = dc_devtype(dev); revision = pci_read_config(dev, DC_PCI_CFRV, 4) & 0x000000FF; + /* Get the eeprom width, but PNIC has no eeprom */ + if (sc->dc_info->dc_did != DC_DEVICEID_82C168) + dc_eeprom_width(sc); + switch(sc->dc_info->dc_did) { case DC_DEVICEID_21143: sc->dc_type = DC_TYPE_21143; sc->dc_flags |= DC_TX_POLL|DC_TX_USE_TX_INTR; sc->dc_flags |= DC_REDUCED_MII_POLL; /* Save EEPROM contents so we can parse them later. */ - dc_read_eeprom(sc, (caddr_t)&sc->dc_srom, 0, 512, 0); + dc_read_srom(sc, sc->dc_romwidth); break; case DC_DEVICEID_DM9009: case DC_DEVICEID_DM9100: @@ -1779,6 +1864,7 @@ sc->dc_flags |= DC_TX_USE_TX_INTR; sc->dc_flags |= DC_TX_ADMTEK_WAR; sc->dc_pmode = DC_PMODE_MII; + dc_read_srom(sc, sc->dc_romwidth); break; case DC_DEVICEID_AN985: case DC_DEVICEID_EN2242: @@ -1786,6 +1872,7 @@ sc->dc_flags |= DC_TX_USE_TX_INTR; sc->dc_flags |= DC_TX_ADMTEK_WAR; sc->dc_pmode = DC_PMODE_MII; + dc_read_srom(sc, sc->dc_romwidth); break; case DC_DEVICEID_98713: case DC_DEVICEID_98713_CP: @@ -1844,7 +1931,7 @@ sc->dc_flags |= DC_TX_INTR_ALWAYS; sc->dc_flags |= DC_REDUCED_MII_POLL; sc->dc_pmode = DC_PMODE_MII; - dc_read_eeprom(sc, (caddr_t)&sc->dc_srom, 0, 256, 0); + dc_read_srom(sc, sc->dc_romwidth); break; default: printf("dc%d: unknown device: %x\n", sc->dc_unit, @@ -1908,6 +1995,8 @@ break; case DC_TYPE_AL981: case DC_TYPE_AN985: + bcopy(&sc->dc_srom[DC_AL_EE_NODEADDR], (caddr_t)&eaddr, + ETHER_ADDR_LEN); dc_read_eeprom(sc, (caddr_t)&eaddr, DC_AL_EE_NODEADDR, 3, 0); break; case DC_TYPE_CONEXANT: @@ -2468,13 +2557,13 @@ * the list buffers. */ -static void dc_txeof(sc) +static void +dc_txeof(sc) struct dc_softc *sc; { struct dc_desc *cur_tx = NULL; struct ifnet *ifp; int idx; - u_int32_t errmask; ifp = &sc->arpcom.ac_if; @@ -2494,7 +2583,6 @@ if (!(cur_tx->dc_ctl & DC_TXCTL_LASTFRAG) || cur_tx->dc_ctl & DC_TXCTL_SETUP) { - sc->dc_cdata.dc_tx_cnt--; if (cur_tx->dc_ctl & DC_TXCTL_SETUP) { /* * Yes, the PNIC is so brain damaged @@ -2511,21 +2599,29 @@ } sc->dc_cdata.dc_tx_chain[idx] = NULL; } + sc->dc_cdata.dc_tx_cnt--; DC_INC(idx, DC_TX_LIST_CNT); continue; } - if (sc->dc_pmode == DC_PMODE_MII) { - errmask = DC_TXSTAT_ERRSUM| - DC_TXSTAT_NOCARRIER|DC_TXSTAT_CARRLOST; + if (DC_IS_CONEXANT(sc)) { /* - * The Conexant chip always reports carrier lost - * in full duplex modes. + * For some reason Conexant chips like + * setting the CARRLOST flag even when + * the carrier is there. In CURRENT we + * have the same problem for Xircom + * cards ! */ - if (DC_IS_CONEXANT(sc) && (sc->dc_if_media & IFM_FDX)) { - errmask &= ~DC_TXSTAT_CARRLOST; - } - if ((txstat & 0xFFFF) & ~errmask) + if (/*sc->dc_type == DC_TYPE_21143 &&*/ + sc->dc_pmode == DC_PMODE_MII && + ((txstat & 0xFFFF) & ~(DC_TXSTAT_ERRSUM| + DC_TXSTAT_NOCARRIER))) + txstat &= ~DC_TXSTAT_ERRSUM; + } else { + if (/*sc->dc_type == DC_TYPE_21143 &&*/ + sc->dc_pmode == DC_PMODE_MII && + ((txstat & 0xFFFF) & ~(DC_TXSTAT_ERRSUM| + DC_TXSTAT_NOCARRIER|DC_TXSTAT_CARRLOST))) txstat &= ~DC_TXSTAT_ERRSUM; } @@ -2553,11 +2649,13 @@ DC_INC(idx, DC_TX_LIST_CNT); } - if (idx != sc->dc_cdata.dc_tx_cons) { + if (idx != sc->dc_cdata.dc_tx_cons) { + /* some buffers have been freed */ sc->dc_cdata.dc_tx_cons = idx; - ifp->if_flags &= ~IFF_OACTIVE; - } - ifp->if_timer = (sc->dc_cdata.dc_tx_cnt == 0) ? 0 : 5; + ifp->if_flags &= ~IFF_OACTIVE; + } + ifp->if_timer = (sc->dc_cdata.dc_tx_cnt == 0) ? 0 : 5; + return; } Index: if_dcreg.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/pci/if_dcreg.h,v retrieving revision 1.4.2.20 diff -u -r1.4.2.20 if_dcreg.h --- if_dcreg.h 5 Feb 2003 22:10:04 -0000 1.4.2.20 +++ if_dcreg.h 7 Feb 2003 19:01:18 -0000 @@ -688,13 +688,14 @@ u_int8_t dc_pmode; u_int8_t dc_link; u_int8_t dc_cachesize; + int dc_romwidth; int dc_pnic_rx_bug_save; unsigned char *dc_pnic_rx_buf; int dc_if_flags; int dc_if_media; u_int32_t dc_flags; u_int32_t dc_txthresh; - u_int8_t dc_srom[1024]; + u_int8_t *dc_srom; struct dc_mediainfo *dc_mi; struct dc_list_data *dc_ldata; struct dc_chain_data dc_cdata; Martin Blapp, ------------------------------------------------------------------ ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 61 826 93 00 Fax: +41 61 826 93 01 PGP: PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A18 B84C 8686 EF22 D300 551E ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 15:16:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FAA37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:16:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from citymail.com.tw (148.1.30.61.isp.tfn.net.tw [61.30.1.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA7543F3F for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:16:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chin1122@citymail.com.tw) From: jerry@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ¦¬¤J¼W¥[ªº¤èªk Reply-To: ch1n1122@citymail.com.tw Date: 08 Feb 2003 07:36:42 +0800 Organization: Foobar Inc. X-Mailer: Gammadyne Mailer x-delete-me: 1 (this tells Gammadyne's server to delete the message) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20030207231636.4FA7543F3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ¦L¶r¾÷

·s¦~§ª«°e±z¤@¥x¦L¶r¾÷ ...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 15:34: 9 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B01D37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:34:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37AB43FE3 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:34:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 07E51536E; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 00:34:03 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Mark Nipper Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030201 crash From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:34:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030207211147.GB62439@ops.tamu.edu> (Mark Nipper's message of "Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:11:47 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030207054918.GA28559@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207145905.GA44046@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207161343.GB44046@ops.tamu.edu> <20030207211147.GB62439@ops.tamu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Nipper writes: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:09:49PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > In any case, the message indicates data corruption in the TCP > > connection which has gone undetected by the NIC and the network stack. > > It's a very unlikely occurrence, but not impossible. > Does this imply hardware failure of some kind? Not necessarily, it could simply be noise on the cable. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 16:22:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73FD37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:22:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from citymail.com.tw (148.1.30.61.isp.tfn.net.tw [61.30.1.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D753343FAF for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:22:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chin1122@citymail.com.tw) From: jerry@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ¦¬¤J¼W¥[ªº¤èªk Reply-To: ch1n1122@citymail.com.tw Date: 08 Feb 2003 08:42:50 +0800 Organization: Foobar Inc. X-Mailer: Gammadyne Mailer x-delete-me: 1 (this tells Gammadyne's server to delete the message) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20030208002240.D753343FAF@mx1.FreeBSD.org> To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ¦L¶r¾÷

·s¦~§ª«°e±z¤@¥x¦L¶r¾÷ ...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 7 19:50:49 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5EB37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 19:50:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from wally.statscout.com (wally.statscout.com [203.39.101.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AD243F3F for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 19:50:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pak@statscout.com) Received: from speedy.statscout.com (ppp4-remote.statscout.com [10.1.3.14]) by wally.statscout.com (8.11.6/8.11.3av) with ESMTP id h183oZ265897; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:50:36 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pak@statscout.com) Received: from speedy.statscout.com (localhost.statscout.com [127.0.0.1]) by speedy.statscout.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h183oYUQ052587; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:50:35 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pak@speedy.statscout.com) Received: (from pak@localhost) by speedy.statscout.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h183oX1F052586; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:50:33 +1000 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Paul Koch Organization: Statscout To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Oliver Fromme Subject: Re: Invalid ps start time values for kernel processes ? Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:50:33 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200302071349.h17Dnefo076099@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200302071349.h17Dnefo076099@lurza.secnetix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200302081350.33720.paul.koch@statscout.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:49 pm, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Paul Koch wrote: > > The ps output value for STARTED appears to be incorrect for > > kernel started processes. I found this while writing a tiny ps > > for our freebsd based network appliance. The start time returned > > from /proc/{normal pid}/status (man procfs) appears to be in > > UTC while the start time for a kernel process appears to be > > localtime (or the other way round). This gave me wild values. > > Is this correct behaviour ? > > Is your CMOS clock running with local time, rather than UTC? > (i.e. does the file /etc/wall_cmos_clock exist?) > > In that case, the kernel will start up with the wrong time > information, because it doesn't know the timezone you're in > (the kernel always uses UTC internally). This information > is corrected by the adjkerntz program in the early stages > of the boot process. > > However, the kernel processes start before that correction > happens. If you were living east of Greenwich (i.e. positive > timezone offset), the start time values would even be in the > future. > > If FreeBSD is the only operating system on that machine, > I suggest that you run the CMOS clock with UTC, avoiding the > problem alltogether. Of course, you can also just ignore > the wrong start values. They should not cause any harm. > > I don't think there is an easy way to fix the problem. My development machine was running CMOS time (might change that because there is no Windows here!) and there is a /etc/wall_cmos_clock file. Our network appliance platform only runs in UTC so my ps runs fine on it. Wouldn't it be more consistant for all process info be stored in UTC and get ps to convert/display it in localtime ? =09Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 1:22:34 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4F537B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 01:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from i19-069.us.catvmics.ne.jp (i19-069.us.catvmics.ne.jp [202.238.34.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D90C43FBF for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 01:22:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peterh@sapros.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by i19-069.us.catvmics.ne.jp (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h189MVM7007640; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 18:22:32 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from peterh@i19-069.us.catvmics.ne.jp) Message-Id: <200302080922.h189MVM7007640@i19-069.us.catvmics.ne.jp> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Steve Bertrand Subject: Re: IPSEC problems after upgrade Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 18:22:31 +0900 From: Peter Haight Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I figured out what the problem was, so I thought I'd post the solution because I never found it when I was searching the archives. Basically, there was a change to the way IPSEC worked and the end result is that the packets get run through the firewall after they get decrypted and so they look like they are coming from an internal network on an external interface and so they get rejected by a firewall rule that was rejecting private network ip addresses. The reason the 'inbound packets violated process security policy' counter was increasing was because the packets were going through NAT and after that they didn't match the SPD. Anyway, I've got everything working again. Someone might want to add a note to the IPSEC handbook docs explaining about this firewall issue and maybe the NAT thing as well. > I've now upgraded two machines that I use as IPSEC tunnel endpoints to > create a VPN. I used to use a script to setup the VPN that I will post > below, but that script no longer works and I haven't been able to figure out > why. Before I upgraded, the VPN was working fine. (Though maybe I had some > security hole that is now caught by FreeBSD and is preventing my VPN from > working.) > > .... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 2:28:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F25437B410 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 02:28:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from shaw.ca (hnllhi1-ar2-4-63-117-049.hnllhi1.dsl-verizon.net [4.63.117.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFE0E43FAF for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 02:28:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thysigylb@shaw.ca) Message-ID: <001511b6da03$dbd28638$77525257@oqkqouq.bpn> From: To: Subject: Come check it out Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 17:10:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Click Here to Visit Our Site!

Talk face to face with thousands of people that share the

same interests as you!

Not Only is it free, if you have a webcam you can get paid to be online!

4.6 million members from more then 100 countries makes iFriends the most diverse online community.

If you just want to chat or need someone to talk to iFriends is there for You.

Click Here to Visit Our Site!

Come see what its all about!

opt-out To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 6:22:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA5137B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 06:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A64D43FB1 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 06:22:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h18EMcdK028558 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:22:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h18EMcud028557; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:22:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:22:38 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200302081422.h18EMcud028557@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Invalid ps start time values for kernel processes ? In-Reply-To: <200302081350.33720.paul.koch@statscout.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.7-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Paul Koch wrote: > My development machine was running CMOS time (might change > that because there is no Windows here!) and there is a > /etc/wall_cmos_clock file. Our network appliance platform only > runs in UTC so my ps runs fine on it. That explains it. > Wouldn't it be more consistant for all process info be stored > in UTC and get ps to convert/display it in localtime ? That's already the case. All times are stored in UTC, and it's only converted to your local timezone for display by ps, ls, date etc. The kernel does not have any timezone information at all -- the kernel knows only UTC. The problem ist that during boot of the kernel, i.e. even before the root filesystem is mounted, there is no way to find out your timezone. If the CMOS clock runs in UTC, then there is no problem -- the kernel just picks it up and uses it as its internal UTC clock. All process time information will be correct, right from the start. However, if the CMOS clock runs in local time, then there is no way for the kernel to convert it to UTC, because the kernel does not know what your local timezone is. How should it know? Those system processes are started before the root filesystem can be mounted, i.e. there is no information from /etc/localtime and /etc/wall_cmos_clock. The kernel has no other choice than interpreting the value of the CMOS clock as UTC, which results in an error that amounts to the offset of your local timezone. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 10:47:36 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E037837B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:47:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.netcologne.de (smtp.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBA843F75 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:47:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tmseck-lists@netcologne.de) Received: from localhost (xdsl-195-14-205-250.netcologne.de [195.14.205.250]) by smtp.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A9A8668C for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:47:31 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 725 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Feb 2003 18:47:31 -0000 Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:47:08 +0100 From: Thomas Seck To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Invalid ps start time values for kernel processes ? Message-ID: <20030208184708.GA705@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200302081350.33720.paul.koch@statscout.com> <200302081422.h18EMcud028557@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302081422.h18EMcud028557@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 X-Attribution: tms Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Oliver Fromme (olli@secnetix.de): > However, if the CMOS clock runs in local time, then there > is no way for the kernel to convert it to UTC, because the > kernel does not know what your local timezone is. How > should it know? NetBSD allows you (when I last looked at it, it was 1.5.something) to set a kernel variable for the difference between CMOS time and UTC at compile time. You would then need two kernels to reflect DST. --Thomas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 13:58: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E87437B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:57:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B7243F75 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:57:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ntroff@myrealbox.com) Received: from myrealbox.com ntroff@smtp-send.myrealbox.com [80.202.211.123] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.28 $ on Novell NetWare; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 14:58:00 -0700 Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 22:57:35 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: From: Martin Kirknes To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <54D29CB6-3BB0-11D7-BC7F-0030657C98C2@myrealbox.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 15:38:57 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC44837B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:38:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from web21502.mail.yahoo.com (web21502.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.169.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6592F43F3F for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:38:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nmblookup@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030208233855.42986.qmail@web21502.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.169.51.2] by web21502.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 15:38:55 PST Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:38:55 -0800 (PST) From: device timeout Subject: 5.0R, file table full To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hey everyone, I installed 5.0-RELEASE shortly after it came out, no problems since. But today, I try to log on via sshd, and it turns out it died. I connected a console and got the following messages: ---- snip quite a lot ---- Feb 8 07:00:00 c24 kernel: file: table is full Feb 8 07:00:00 c24 kernel: file: table is full Feb 8 07:00:00 c24 kernel: pid 80384 (cron), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Feb 8 07:00:03 c24 syslogd: /dev/console: Too many open files in system: Too many open files in system Feb 8 07:00:03 c24 kernel: file: table is full Feb 8 07:00:03 c24 last message repeated 4 times Feb 8 07:00:03 c24 sm-mta[80391]: h18D03El080391: SYSERR(UID0): gatherq: cannot open "/var/spool/mqueue": Too many open file$ Feb 8 07:00:05 c24 kernel: file: table is full Feb 8 07:00:05 c24 last message repeated 16 times Feb 8 07:00:05 c24 sm-msp-queue[80392]: h18D05uK080392: SYSERR(UID0): gatherq: cannot open "/var/spool/clientmqueue": Too ma$ Feb 8 07:00:10 c24 kernel: file: table is full Feb 8 07:00:43 c24 last message repeated 47 times Feb 8 07:02:43 c24 last message repeated 203 times Feb 8 07:05:00 c24 last message repeated 227 times Feb 8 07:05:00 c24 kernel: pid 80394 (cron), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Feb 8 09:46:05 c24 dhclient: /usr/src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/dhclient.c(2018): null pointer Feb 8 09:46:05 c24 kernel: file: table is full ---- snip ---- These all came on the console, syslogd had stopped. Does anyone have any idea why I'm getting these? Any help will be appreciated. $ uname -a FreeBSD c24.159.208.202.man.mn.charter.com 5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE #1: Thu Jan 23 16:36:23 CST 2003 root@c24.159.208.250.man.mn.charter.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 - anton __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 16:23:19 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8625A37B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:23:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from web13508.mail.yahoo.com (web13508.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 455D143FAF for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:23:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from us23north@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030209002316.68966.qmail@web13508.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.248.81.66] by web13508.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 16:23:16 PST Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:23:16 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Buchanan Subject: Make installworld fails on 4.7 (unknown user smmsp) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello List, I just attempted a make installworld on FreeBSD 4.7 Stable #5, from 11/17/2002. The src directory was just re-installed (it became corrupted) from 4.7-Release yesterday and cvsuped to date this morning. I've never had a make installworld fail before, after doing this every two weeks for two years. Any help would be greatly appreciated. TIA! Eric -------- mkdir -p /tmp/install.59745 for prog in [ awk cat chflags chmod chown date echo egrep find grep ln make makewhatis mtree mv perl pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test true uname wc zic; do cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.59745; done cd /backup/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 OBJFORMAT_PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libexec PERL5LIB=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/bin GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/share/groff_font GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/share/tmac PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/games:/tmp/install.59745 make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Making hierarchy -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /backup/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 hierarchy cd /backup/src/etc; make distrib-dirs set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" /backup/src/etc/locale.deprecated`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do for dir in /usr/share/locale /usr/share/nls /usr/local/share/nls; do test -d /${dir} && cd /${dir}; test -L "$2" && rm -rf "$2"; test \! -L "$1" && test -d "$1" && mv "$1" "$2"; done; shift; shift; done mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p / tmp changed type expected dir found link var changed type expected dir found link mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist -p /usr mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p / mtree: line 10: unknown user smmsp *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src/etc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /backup/src. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 16:36:37 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607A137B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:36:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-224.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D7044015 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:36:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h190aMYP020977; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:36:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h190aMbd020976; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:36:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:36:22 -0800 From: David Schultz To: nmblookup@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0R, file table full Message-ID: <20030209003622.GA20937@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: nmblookup@yahoo.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030208233855.42986.qmail@web21502.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030208233855.42986.qmail@web21502.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Mr. Timeout : > Does anyone have any idea why I'm getting these? fstat(1) knows. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 16:37:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0949037B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:37:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4304B43F3F for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:37:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16621; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:37:27 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Eric Buchanan , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make installworld fails on 4.7 (unknown user smmsp) Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:37:26 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030209002316.68966.qmail@web13508.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030209002316.68966.qmail@web13508.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302081637.27036.kstewart@owt.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Saturday 08 February 2003 04:23 pm, Eric Buchanan wrote: > Hello List, > I just attempted a make installworld on FreeBSD 4.7 > Stable #5, from 11/17/2002. The src directory was just > re-installed (it became corrupted) from 4.7-Release > yesterday and cvsuped to date this morning. I've never > had a make installworld fail before, after doing this > every two weeks for two years. That kind of problem was covered in UPDATING for a couple of releases ago. Sounds like you have a group and passwd file that is older than 4.7-release. The "mergemaster -p" option was added so you could run it before the installworld. Kent > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. TIA! > Eric > -------- > > mkdir -p /tmp/install.59745 > for prog in [ awk cat chflags chmod chown date echo > egrep find grep ln make makewhatis mtree mv perl > pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test true uname wc zic; do > cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.59745; done > cd /backup/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj > MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 > OBJFORMAT_PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libexec > PERL5LIB=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 > GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/bin > GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/share/groff_font > > GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/share/tmac > > PATH=/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/b >in:/usr/obj/backup/src/i386/usr/games:/tmp/install.59745 make -f > Makefile.inc1 reinstall > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> Making hierarchy > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > cd /backup/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 hierarchy > cd /backup/src/etc; make distrib-dirs > set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" > /backup/src/etc/locale.deprecated`; while [ $# -gt 0 > ] ; do for dir in /usr/share/locale /usr/share/nls > /usr/local/share/nls; do test -d /${dir} && cd > /${dir}; test -L "$2" && rm -rf "$2"; test \! -L > "$1" && test -d "$1" && mv "$1" "$2"; done; shift; > shift; done > mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p / > tmp changed > type expected dir found link > var changed > type expected dir found link > mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p > /var > mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist -p > /usr > mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist > -p /usr/include > mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist > -p /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach > mtree -deU -f /backup/src/etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist > -p / > mtree: line 10: unknown user smmsp > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /backup/src/etc. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /backup/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /backup/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /backup/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /backup/src. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 18:41: 2 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452F237B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 18:41:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from david.io.com (david.io.com [199.170.88.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B8243F75 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 18:41:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eighner@io.com) Received: from io.com (aus-as2-080.io.com [199.170.89.80]) by david.io.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) with SMTP id h192etK08732; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 20:40:56 -0600 Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 20:43:11 -0600 (CST) From: Lars Eighner To: Eric Buchanan Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make installworld fails on 4.7 (unknown user smmsp) In-Reply-To: <20030209002316.68966.qmail@web13508.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20030208204113.G1690-100000@dumpster.io.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Eric Buchanan wrote: > Hello List, > I just attempted a make installworld on FreeBSD 4.7 > Stable #5, from 11/17/2002. The src directory was just > re-installed (it became corrupted) from 4.7-Release > yesterday and cvsuped to date this morning. I've never > had a make installworld fail before, after doing this > every two weeks for two years. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. TIA! Did you run mergemaster -p *before* you tried to install world? -- Lars Eighner eighner@io.com -finger for geek code- http://www.io.com/~eighner/index.html 600 E 53RD ST APT 119 AUSTIN TX 78751 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 8 19:59:31 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EB737B401 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:59:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A4D43F3F for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:59:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0918A2343 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:59:23 -0400 (AST) Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:59:23 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Adaptec 2000S + Tyan Thunder L-ET == BTX Loader failure ... Message-ID: <20030208235536.I7884@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From what I can find on the 'Net, this is a known issue, but, I can't seem to find a solution to it ... is there one? I had originally installed on this same hardware, it just seems that it started to give the BTX failure on reboot one day ... if I try and boot from floppy, and 'load disk1s1a:/kernel' then do a 'boot', it appears to cause the server itself to reboot, so either I'm doing that wrong, or my problems are deeper then I suspect? Thanks ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message