From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 00:24:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453EA16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 00:24:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04D943FDD for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 00:24:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA28OaSD088842; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:24:36 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:24:36 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Greg Lehey In-Reply-To: <20031102022546.GA3275@adelaide.lemis.com> Message-ID: <20031102111141.J39358@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20031031153427.P81511@woozle.rinet.ru> <001d01c39fcc$51accdd0$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> <20031102022546.GA3275@adelaide.lemis.com> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: vinum question: how could one correctly "disassemble" vinum volumes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 08:24:40 -0000 On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Greg Lehey wrote: GL> On Friday, 31 October 2003 at 15:41:42 +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: GL> > Dear colleagues, GL> > GL> > [I'm under 4-STABLE] GL> > GL> > What is the correct sequence to delete existing vinum module (for example, GL> > raid10) and do *not* use -f flags for vinum? GL> GL> I think your terminology is incorrect. To delete an existing Vinum GL> module under release 4, you would normally do: Urgh. Yeah, sure, something clouden my mind: s/module/volume/g of course ;-) But not only, see below. GL> > in my case t is raid10 vovume: GL> > GL> > vinum -> l -r t GL> > V t State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8191 MB GL> > P t.p0 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 8191 MB GL> > P t.p1 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 8191 MB GL> > S t.d0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 4095 MB GL> > S t.d8 State: up PO: 260 kB Size: 4095 MB GL> > S t.d2 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 4095 MB GL> > S t.d10 State: up PO: 260 kB Size: 4095 MB GL> GL> These subdisk names are very confusing. They are temporary, suffixes are derived from ata disk numbers, and I do *NOT* plan to use such names in production -- just for testing (made attaching/detaching a bit easier) GL> > umount /dev/vinum/t GL> > vinum stop t (ok) GL> > vinum stop t.p0 <- this operation silently puts t up, and sets t.p0 faulty This is my main question. Why *stopping* object (plex) puts aggregate object (volume) up silently, and finishes without an error? Seems lika a bug for me... GL> > vinum stop t (ok) GL> > vinum stop t.p1 GL> > GL> > Last comment leads to error GL> > GL> > Can't stop t.p1: Device busy (16) GL> GL> Why do you want to stop a plex? To _correctly_ (without -f and without harm to other objects in volume) detach plex from volume. GL> > Final state of objects are GL> > GL> > vinum -> l -r t GL> > V t State: down Plexes: 2 Size: 8191 MB GL> > P t.p0 S State: faulty Subdisks: 2 Size: 8191 MB GL> > P t.p1 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 8191 MB GL> > S t.d0 State: down PO: 0 B Size: 4095 MB GL> > S t.d8 State: down PO: 260 kB Size: 4095 MB GL> > S t.d2 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 4095 MB GL> > S t.d10 State: up PO: 260 kB Size: 4095 MB GL> > GL> > Any suggestions? should I dig into vinum sources to track this down? GL> GL> Well, I think you know the answer: use the -f flag. But maybe I'm GL> misunderstanding the question. And I did failed to specify what I think, sorry ;-))) Parallel/aggregate question: let's assume we have raid10 volume, hence 4 sd's: volume v plex org striped 260k sd drive a sd drive b plex org striped 260k sd drive c sd drive d Is there procedure to rearrange subdisks in v (surely, stopping volume and re-newfs'ing required) to made raid0 volume *without* using -f (well, not exactly, as you can not attach sd to striped plex without it)? For me, it would be logical to: stop v stop v.p0 stop v.p1 detach v.p1.s0 detach v.p1.s1 attach -f v.p.s0 v.p0 rename attach -f v.p.s1 v.p0 rename Comments? Anyway, thank you very much for cooperation. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 01:19:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C0C16A4D0; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 01:19:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from segfault.kiev.ua (segfault.kiev.ua [193.193.193.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AA543F3F; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 01:19:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by segfault.kiev.ua (8) with UUCP id hB29JJCd068004; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:19:19 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua) Received: (from netch@localhost) by iv.nn.kiev.ua (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) id hA29I9d5000349; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:18:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from netch) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:18:09 +0200 From: Valentin Nechayev To: Dan Strick Message-ID: <20031102091809.GA310@iv.nn.kiev.ua> References: <200310221014.h9MAEX3V001280@ice.nodomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310221014.h9MAEX3V001280@ice.nodomain> X-42: On Organization: Dark side of coredump cc: dan@ice.nodomain cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS file system problem in either stable or current X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 09:19:26 -0000 Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file system problem in either stable or current": DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs DS> support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on DS> both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect DS> summary data in the superblock. Presumably only one can be correct. DS> I just don't know which to blame. Does this require explicit fsck? I have dual-booting between 4.9-release (and all previous 4.* releases earlier) and 5.1 (of 20030526) with shared disks and boot checking required in fstab; sometimes one of them crash and forced checking is made; neither 4.* nor 5.1 claims superblock is bad. -netch- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 01:43:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAF116A4CE; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 01:43:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F72843F3F; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 01:43:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from news1.macomnet.ru (1goa344d@news1.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.14]) by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA29hmSi21806515; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:43:48 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:43:48 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Valentin Nechayev In-Reply-To: <20031102091809.GA310@iv.nn.kiev.ua> Message-ID: <20031102124123.H39971@news1.macomnet.ru> References: <200310221014.h9MAEX3V001280@ice.nodomain> <20031102091809.GA310@iv.nn.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Dan Strick cc: dan@ice.nodomain cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS file system problem in either stable or current X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 09:43:53 -0000 On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, 11:18+0200, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file system problem in either stable or current": > > DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs > DS> support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on > DS> both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect > DS> summary data in the superblock. Presumably only one can be correct. > DS> I just don't know which to blame. > > Does this require explicit fsck? > I have dual-booting between 4.9-release (and all previous 4.* releases earlier) > and 5.1 (of 20030526) with shared disks and boot checking required in fstab; > sometimes one of them crash and forced checking is made; neither 4.* nor 5.1 > claims superblock is bad. mckusick's answer: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=100639+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030323.freebsd-current Dan's PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/58373 -- Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 10:12:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE68116A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 10:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (207-173-254-228.bras01.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [207.173.254.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D7543F75 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 10:12:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from bigdaddy (unknown [192.168.1.3]) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D52323BF3AA; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 10:12:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <010301c3a16c$f0293c40$0301a8c0@bigdaddy> From: "Drew Tomlinson" To: "Zoran Kolic" , References: <20031102061154.GA539@> Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 10:12:54 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 Subject: Re: ipfw2 logging X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:12:57 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zoran Kolic" To: Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:11 PM Subject: ipfw2 logging > > Dear list! > I have a little problem, trying > to enable logging of deny rule. > I have enabled it via kernel: > > options IPFIREWALL > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=3 This seems to be a very small limit. Do you really intend to end logging of a rule after three matches? > It is ipfw2. After that, my inten- > tion was to use syslogd and > > !ipfw > *.* /var/log/ipfw.log > > and newsyslog with > > /var/log/ipfw.log 600 3 100 * J On my system, none of this was necessary. By default, firewall messages are logged to /var/log/security. If you don't have this file, try using 'touch' to create it and then see if you get firewall messages. > In rc.conf I have > > firewall_enable="YES" > firewall_logging="YES" > > Well! Firewall works, I have data > with "ipfw show", but there is no > log. My intentioned rule is > > add 65535 deny log all from any to any This rule will log all denied packets until the limit (in your case, 3 packets) is reached. Then logging will stop until counters are cleared with either 'zero' or 'resetlog'. > It should work, but is does not. > What I am doing wrong? > With no syslogd and newsyslog, log > would be in "messages" file in > /var/log directory? As I mention above, look for messages in /var/log/security. Cheers, Drew From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 11:08:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A283416A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:08:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pimout4-ext.prodigy.net (pimout4-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4337F43FD7 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:08:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frumin@phreaker.net) Received: from Astron (dialup-67.72.213.160.Dial1.Detroit1.Level3.net [67.72.213.160])hA2J8VUC087344 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 14:08:32 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 14:09:51 -0500 From: frumin To: stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20031102190951.GA28874@Astron.Astron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; Format=Flowed; DelSp=Yes; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 2.0.15 Lines: 3 Subject: evolution mail client X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:08:34 -0000 Hi, I just wanted to know if anyone else is encountering error when compiling Evolution on FreeBSD 4.8 or 4.9. I have problems compiling e- util section of this port. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 11:52:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C70516A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:52:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.covadmail.net (mx05.covadmail.net [63.65.120.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 843A843FBD for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:52:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@covad.net) Received: (covad.net 7923 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2003 19:52:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mist.nodomain) (68.164.174.72) by sun-qmail15 with SMTP; 2 Nov 2003 19:52:01 -0000 Received: from mist.nodomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mist.nodomain (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA2Jpoqb000382; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:51:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@mist.nodomain) Received: (from dan@localhost) by mist.nodomain (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hA2JpoHR000381; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:51:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:51:50 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Strick Message-Id: <200311021951.hA2JpoHR000381@mist.nodomain> To: netch@netch.kiev.ua cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: dan@mist.nodomain Subject: Re: UFS file system problem in either stable or current X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:52:09 -0000 On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file > system problem in either stable or current": > DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs > DS> support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on > DS> both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect > DS> summary data in the superblock. Presumably only one can be correct. > DS> I just don't know which to blame. > > Does this require explicit fsck? > I have dual-booting between 4.9-release (and all previous 4.* releases earlier) > and 5.1 (of 20030526) with shared disks and boot checking required in fstab; > sometimes one of them crash and forced checking is made; neither 4.* nor 5.1 > claims superblock is bad. You wouldn't notice after a crash. The incompatibility turns out to be the location and perhaps details of the "summary information" (e.g. number of free blocks) in the superblock. This does not affect the integrity of the file system. It does affect the output of the "df" command. The first time you run fsck on a file system after modifying it when running the other operating system, fsck will probably find inconsistent super block summary data. "fsck -p" will correct it without asking (and might not even say much about it). I recently read something in one of the FreeBSD newsgroups that suggests that this incompatibility between 4.x and 5.x has in some sense been corrected in -current. I don't know any details. See also: Dan Strick strick@covad.net From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 21:32:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD8E16A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 21:32:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from faeton1.ru (relay.faeton1.ru [217.18.136.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877A743FE5 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 21:32:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@avtf.org) Received: from faeton1.ru (localhost.faeton1.ru [127.0.0.1]) hA35X6WE008195 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:33:06 +0600 (OMST) Received: (from root@localhost) by relay.faeton1.ru (8.12.9-20030924/8.12.9/Submit) id hA35X6BT008194 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org.KAV; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:33:06 +0600 (OMST) Received: from 217.18.136.232 (ptr-232.faeton1.ru [217.18.136.232] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)hA35X5WE008186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:33:06 +0600 (OMST) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:30:50 +0600 From: Sergey Sysoev X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <16410385802.20031103113050@faeton1.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: opie bug or ..? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergey Sysoev List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 05:32:27 -0000 Hi. I have a question related to freebsd opie implementation. I am running 4.9-RELEASE and I've tried to setup opie. *** 1 *** opiepasswd/opiekey I've added user using `opiepasswd -c "ssa"` mx2# opiepasswd -c "ssa" Adding ssa: Only use this method from the console; NEVER from remote. If you are using telnet, xterm, or a dial-in, type ^C now or exit with no password. Then run opiepasswd without the -c parameter. Using MD5 to compute responses. Enter new secret pass phrase: Again new secret pass phrase: ID ssa OTP key is 499 mx1759 WADE IFFY LAWN MEAD DANG BUB mx2# And now I want to change it mx2# opiepasswd "ssa" Updating ssa: You need the response from an OTP generator. New secret pass phrase: otp-md5 499 mx17 Response: You see that seed equal 'mx17', using opiekey: mx2# opiekey 499 mx17 Using the MD5 algorithm to compute response. Seeds must be greater than 5 characters long. mx2# So it is not possible to update password in /etc/opiekey file, you have to edit it manually and that add password again via 'opiepasswd'. *** 2*** opiekey opiekey could not generate response for zero sequence number when it specified directly: mx2# opiekey -a 0 vo6199 Using the MD5 algorithm to compute response. Sequence number 0 is not positive. but it works fine in case of: mx2# opiekey -n5 1 vo6199 Using the MD5 algorithm to compute response. Reminder: Don't use opiekey from telnet or dial-in sessions. Enter secret pass phrase: 0: OAK SEW CULT FALL AX WAND 1: BOUT AID SOOT BUT SIT BILK mx2# *** 3 *** pam_opie.so, the most interesting thing After successful login with 0 sequence number, trying to do it again (sequence number has been decreased, right?) mx2# ssh ssa@192.168.90.250 otp-md5 -1 (null) ext Password: Is it impossible to calculate response to '-1' so trying to use any password to skip pam_opie and login with next pam module. But here login hangs and there is _no_way_ to login remotely because pam_opie.so is the top line of pam.conf After about 1-2 minutes timeout it just says "Connection closed by 192.168.90.250" *** 4 *** now just a question (In case of fix) After 0 or 1 seq. number it should recount from the beginning, for example from 499, but I think that seed should be automatically changed in that case for next 500 iterations otherwise that is not one-time-passwords So... I think that is not good ... or am I mistaken? -- Best regards, Sergey From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 00:02:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B6116A4CF; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:02:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from gddsn.org.cn (mail.gddsn.org.cn [210.21.6.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C698F43FD7; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:02:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wsk@mail.gddsn.org.cn) Received: from mail.gddsn.org.cn (unknown [192.168.168.17]) by gddsn.org.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F63338CB99; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:02:45 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <3FA60BA4.5010406@mail.gddsn.org.cn> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:02:44 +0800 From: Suken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; zh-CN; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030424 X-Accept-Language: zh-cn,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org, zec@tel.fer.hr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re:Network stack cloning / virtualization patches for 4.9-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:02:47 -0000 hi,Marko after apply your patch under my FBSD4.9R I make depend failed while rebuilding my kernel.... follow is my error mesgs: ... rm -f .newdep make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -I../../contrib/dev/acpica -I../../contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 ../../netinet/tcp_syncache.c:335: macro `SYNCACHE_HASH6' used with only 2 args ../../netinet/tcp_syncache.c:432: macro `SYNCACHE_HASH6' used with only 2 args mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 what can i do??? :-( thanx any info :-) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 01:00:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F1916A4CF; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 01:00:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from cray.e-card.bg (mjak.e-card.bg [212.91.167.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517A443FBD; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:59:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from altares@cray.e-card.bg) Received: from cray.e-card.bg (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cray.e-card.bg (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA38xmNX021105; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:59:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from altares@cray.e-card.bg) Received: (from altares@localhost) by cray.e-card.bg (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hA38xjG1021104; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:59:46 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:59:45 +0200 From: Rumen Telbizov To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031103085945.GA20231@e-card.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD and serial ata X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:00:02 -0000 Dear List, This is my second post since I did not receive any answers the first time. I have P4P800-VM motherboard with serial ata controlers (ICH5) and serial ata discs. I managed to install FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE on this box when setting the IDE controller in legacy mode. Everything works normal except when booting, the drives are set into UDMA33 mode: atapci0: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0- 0x7 irq 0 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 ad1: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device ad1: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA33 I read somewhere that this message is a hoax and that the drive should actually work in UDMA150. Is this my case? I also checked the source of ata-dma.c: Here is the section. #if 1 if (udmamode > 2 && !atadev->param->hwres_cblid) { ata_prtdev(atadev,"DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device\n"); udmamode = 2; } #endif Maybe this should sound like: if ( (udmamode > 2) && (udmamode < 5) && (!atadev->param->hwres_cblid) ) { ata_prtdev(atadev,"DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device\n"); udmamode = 2; } All comments are wellcome. Thank you in advance Rumen Telbizov From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 01:06:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E6E16A4D2; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 01:06:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C0243F75; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 01:06:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA396NVv063941; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:06:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hA396MOg063940; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:06:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200311030906.hA396MOg063940@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <20031103085945.GA20231@e-card.bg> To: Rumen Telbizov Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:06:22 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.3 cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD and serial ata X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:06:27 -0000 It seems Rumen Telbizov wrote: > any answers the first time. > > I have P4P800-VM motherboard with serial ata > controlers (ICH5) and serial ata discs. I managed > to install FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE on this box when > setting the IDE controller in legacy mode. > Everything works normal except when booting, > the drives are set into UDMA33 mode: > > atapci0: port > 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0- > 0x7 irq 0 at device 31.2 on pci0 > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > > ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device > ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 > ad1: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device > ad1: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA33 > > I read somewhere that this message is a hoax and that > the drive should actually work in UDMA150. Is this my case? Yes, there are no "modes" on SATA (so far) its just SATA-150 in this case and the drives (if true SATA drives not PATA with converters) run SATA-150 over the inteface as soon as youselect any DMA mode. > I also checked the source of ata-dma.c: > Here is the section. > > #if 1 > if (udmamode > 2 && !atadev->param->hwres_cblid) { > ata_prtdev(atadev,"DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device\n"); > udmamode = 2; > } > #endif > > > Maybe this should sound like: > if ( (udmamode > 2) && (udmamode < 5) && (!atadev->param->hwres_cblid) ) { > ata_prtdev(atadev,"DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device\n"); > udmamode = 2; > } > > All comments are wellcome. That wont work.. The problem here is that -stable's ATA driver doesn't have the infrastructure to handle SATA properly, so what you have here is a crude hack to get some controllers working, but you will have to live with the fallout above... -Sĝren From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 01:42:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8142816A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 01:42:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from cray.e-card.bg (mjak.e-card.bg [212.91.167.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA8B43FAF for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 01:42:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from altares@cray.e-card.bg) Received: from cray.e-card.bg (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cray.e-card.bg (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA39g0NX021967; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:42:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from altares@cray.e-card.bg) Received: (from altares@localhost) by cray.e-card.bg (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hA39ft1d021966; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:41:55 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:41:55 +0200 From: Rumen Telbizov To: Soren Schmidt Message-ID: <20031103094155.GD20231@e-card.bg> References: <20031103085945.GA20231@e-card.bg> <200311030906.hA396MOg063940@spider.deepcore.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311030906.hA396MOg063940@spider.deepcore.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD and serial ata X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:42:05 -0000 Thanks for the fast reply Soren. I do appreciate it. On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:06:22AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Rumen Telbizov wrote: > > any answers the first time. > > > > I have P4P800-VM motherboard with serial ata > > controlers (ICH5) and serial ata discs. I managed > > to install FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE on this box when > > setting the IDE controller in legacy mode. > > Everything works normal except when booting, > > the drives are set into UDMA33 mode: > > > > atapci0: port > > 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0- > > 0x7 irq 0 at device 31.2 on pci0 > > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > > > > ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device > > ad0: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 > > ad1: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device > > ad1: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA33 > > > > I read somewhere that this message is a hoax and that > > the drive should actually work in UDMA150. Is this my case? > > Yes, there are no "modes" on SATA (so far) its just SATA-150 in this > case and the drives (if true SATA drives not PATA with converters) > run SATA-150 over the inteface as soon as youselect any DMA mode. > Great! Yes my drives ARE Serial ata. I tested the speed by copying from one drive to the other and I have a rough estimation of 32MBytes/s transfer. (Softupdates enabled). bonnie++ reports ~ 55MBytes/s sequential read/write speed. > > I also checked the source of ata-dma.c: > > Here is the section. > > > > #if 1 > > if (udmamode > 2 && !atadev->param->hwres_cblid) { > > ata_prtdev(atadev,"DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device\n"); > > udmamode = 2; > > } > > #endif > > > > > > Maybe this should sound like: > > if ( (udmamode > 2) && (udmamode < 5) && (!atadev->param->hwres_cblid) ) { > > ata_prtdev(atadev,"DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device\n"); > > udmamode = 2; > > } > > > > All comments are wellcome. > > That wont work.. > > The problem here is that -stable's ATA driver doesn't have the infrastructure > to handle SATA properly, so what you have here is a crude hack to get some > controllers working, but you will have to live with the fallout above... Yeah I know this is an ugly patch. I just thought it might be usefull to make the OS stop weeping nothing else. Anyway. What exactly do you mean by saying that -stable's ATA driver doesn't have the infrastructure to handle SATA properly? How do my controlers work now? Because of the legacy support in the BIOS? If the controler is in legacy mode does it work with the full speed as if it were in native (enhanced) mode? Thank you. Rumen Telbizov From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 02:35:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414A716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 02:35:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from 100m.mpr200-2.esr.lvcm.net (100m.mpr200-2.esr.lvcm.net [24.234.0.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546FC43FB1 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 02:35:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sevn@dangpow.com) Received: from dangpow.com (ip68-104-88-107.lv.lv.cox.net [68.104.88.107]) by 100m.mpr200-2.esr.lvcm.net (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.5) with ESMTP id BEG37444; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 02:35:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3FA62F7B.5000005@dangpow.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 02:35:39 -0800 From: 7 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031028 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Just thanks X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 10:35:49 -0000 Hey There, I'd been out of town, but just got back earlier and had a wonderful uneventful upgrade to 4.9 release on a poweredge 1400SC. Thanks for all the hard work making my favorite OS the easy decision it has been for my servers. I encourage everyone to purchase the CD sets whether they download and burn or not. I haven't seen anything anywhere on the MSI Master2 FAR dual Opteron board yet, but I'll be putting together a system with one for testing soon. If I run into any issues I'll share them. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 03:16:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7594816A4D0 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 03:16:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from tango.setec.fr (tango.setec.fr [195.68.57.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EE643FFB for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 03:16:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adrien.fache@its.setec.fr) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tango.setec.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1642A4B1E for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:16:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from POSEIDON (poseidon.setec.fr [192.168.40.75]) by tango.setec.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E7DA4A84 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:15:59 +0100 (CET) From: "Adrien FACHE" To: Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:15:59 +0100 Message-ID: <003e01c3a1fb$dc2b6300$4b28a8c0@its.setec.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Subject: exited on signal 11 on unrar X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 11:16:08 -0000 Hi all, This is my first experiencing with writing to English-speaking mailing list, so, please excuse me for possible mistakes. I'm a newbie on freebsd. I have a mail server on FreeBSD 4.7 with Postfix and Amavis ( mail virus scanner ). The problem is I got this in my log periodically : /kernel: pid 24499 (unrar), uid 1010: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) I use unrar for Amavis Does this look like a software or hardware problem? If anyone have a idea Thanx in advance Adrien From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 05:36:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EE716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 05:36:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F331643FCB for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 05:36:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8D3613B05; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:36:29 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Adrien FACHE" References: <003e01c3a1fb$dc2b6300$4b28a8c0@its.setec.fr> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 03 Nov 2003 08:36:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <003e01c3a1fb$dc2b6300$4b28a8c0@its.setec.fr> Message-ID: <44oevtinfm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: exited on signal 11 on unrar X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:36:30 -0000 "Adrien FACHE" writes: > This is my first experiencing with writing to English-speaking > mailing list, so, please excuse me for possible mistakes. > > I'm a newbie on freebsd. I have a mail server on FreeBSD 4.7 with > Postfix and Amavis ( mail virus scanner ). > > The problem is I got this in my log periodically : > > /kernel: pid 24499 (unrar), uid 1010: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > > I use unrar for Amavis > > Does this look like a software or hardware problem? http://www.freebsd-fr.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#SIGNAL11 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 07:20:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB4D16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 07:20:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F33543FCB for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 07:20:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) hA3FKEdl021865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:20:31 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id hA3FKBfB021855; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:20:11 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:20:11 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20031103152011.GA21305@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Lowell Gilbert , Adrien FACHE , stable@freebsd.org References: <003e01c3a1fb$dc2b6300$4b28a8c0@its.setec.fr> <44oevtinfm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44oevtinfm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: exited on signal 11 on unrar X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:20:47 -0000 --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:36:29AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Adrien FACHE" writes: >=20 > > This is my first experiencing with writing to English-speaking > > mailing list, so, please excuse me for possible mistakes. > >=20 > > I'm a newbie on freebsd. I have a mail server on FreeBSD 4.7 with > > Postfix and Amavis ( mail virus scanner ). > >=20 > > The problem is I got this in my log periodically : > >=20 > > /kernel: pid 24499 (unrar), uid 1010: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > >=20 > > I use unrar for Amavis=20 > >=20 > > Does this look like a software or hardware problem?=20 >=20 > http://www.freebsd-fr.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html= #SIGNAL11 If the OP had a hardware problem, then the crashes would occur randomly in any application and probably the kernel too (in which case the machine would panic). Even so, the observed symptoms might still be due to hardware problems, but given the circumstances I'd be thinking otherwise. If the problem always occurs in unrar(1) then either the unrar program on that machine is somewhat corrupted or you've discovered a bug in unrar. In the first case, simply reinstalling unrar will probably sort our the problem. Use cvsup(1) to pull down the latest ports tree and compile and install unrar from source. Before building, disable any excessive optimization levels you may have in /etc/make.conf -- certainly nothing more highly optimized than 'CFLAGS=3D -O -pipe'. Make sure CPUTYPE is either left unset or set to the correct type that matches your hardware. If the problem still persists, can you identify one or more attachments that cause unrar to SEGV repeatably, and possibly obtain a core dump from an unrar compiled with debugging symbols? unrar should never dump core, even when presented with pathological input, and the unrar developers (http://www.rarsoft.com/) will be most interested to hear about a repeatable way of making it do so. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/pnIrdtESqEQa7a0RAkyfAJ91BOdd6PfVUekWkLv0CVlehhCdJgCfWxS/ fIr/XfgD52c4hRu7B3CQwhc= =Pyqc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 08:14:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B112916A4CF for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from sequel.rsm.ru (sequel.rsm.ru [213.80.139.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6CB43FBD for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:14:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aga@rsm.ru) Received: from rsm.ru (magic.rsm.ru [213.80.139.148])hA3GE6824931; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:14:06 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <3FA67EC8.1040502@rsm.ru> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 19:14:00 +0300 From: Dmitry Agafonov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030423 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrien FACHE References: <003e01c3a1fb$dc2b6300$4b28a8c0@its.setec.fr> In-Reply-To: <003e01c3a1fb$dc2b6300$4b28a8c0@its.setec.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: OK cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: exited on signal 11 on unrar X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:14:20 -0000 Hi! Where was RAR file format changes since 4.7, your unrar did not understand new rar archives and dies... So, as was suggested - update unrar. -- Dmitry Adrien FACHE wrote: >Hi all, > >This is my first experiencing with writing to English-speaking > mailing list, so, please excuse me for possible mistakes. > >I'm a newbie on freebsd. I have a mail server on FreeBSD 4.7 with >Postfix and Amavis ( mail virus scanner ). > >The problem is I got this in my log periodically : > >/kernel: pid 24499 (unrar), uid 1010: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) > >I use unrar for Amavis > >Does this look like a software or hardware problem? > >If anyone have a idea > > >Thanx in advance > > > >Adrien > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 10:20:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20E816A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:20:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from tenebras.com (dnscache.tenebras.com [66.92.188.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B83D843FE5 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 59359 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 18:20:01 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by laptop.tenebras.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 18:20:01 -0000 Message-ID: <3FA69C50.9000602@tenebras.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 10:20:00 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, zh-tw, zh-cn, fr, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Sysoev References: <16410385802.20031103113050@faeton1.ru> In-Reply-To: <16410385802.20031103113050@faeton1.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opie bug or ..? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 18:20:03 -0000 Forgive the top-post -- I have independently verified this, suggest you open a PR. This is definitely a bug in opiepasswd. It is also present in RELENG_4_8. Regards, Michael Sergey Sysoev wrote: > Hi. I have a question related to freebsd opie implementation. > I am running 4.9-RELEASE and I've tried to setup opie. > > *** 1 *** opiepasswd/opiekey > > I've added user using `opiepasswd -c "ssa"` > > mx2# opiepasswd -c "ssa" > Adding ssa: > Only use this method from the console; NEVER from remote. If you are using > telnet, xterm, or a dial-in, type ^C now or exit with no password. > Then run opiepasswd without the -c parameter. > Using MD5 to compute responses. > Enter new secret pass phrase: > Again new secret pass phrase: > > ID ssa OTP key is 499 mx1759 > WADE IFFY LAWN MEAD DANG BUB > mx2# > > And now I want to change it > > mx2# opiepasswd "ssa" > Updating ssa: > You need the response from an OTP generator. > New secret pass phrase: > otp-md5 499 mx17 > Response: > > You see that seed equal 'mx17', using opiekey: > > mx2# opiekey 499 mx17 > Using the MD5 algorithm to compute response. > Seeds must be greater than 5 characters long. > mx2# > > So it is not possible to update password in /etc/opiekey file, you > have to edit it manually and that add password again via 'opiepasswd'. > > > > *** 2*** opiekey > > opiekey could not generate response for zero sequence number when it > specified directly: > > mx2# opiekey -a 0 vo6199 > Using the MD5 algorithm to compute response. > Sequence number 0 is not positive. > > but it works fine in case of: > > mx2# opiekey -n5 1 vo6199 > Using the MD5 algorithm to compute response. > Reminder: Don't use opiekey from telnet or dial-in sessions. > Enter secret pass phrase: > 0: OAK SEW CULT FALL AX WAND > 1: BOUT AID SOOT BUT SIT BILK > mx2# > > *** 3 *** pam_opie.so, the most interesting thing > > After successful login with 0 sequence number, trying to do it again > (sequence number has been decreased, right?) > > mx2# ssh ssa@192.168.90.250 > otp-md5 -1 (null) ext > Password: > > Is it impossible to calculate response to '-1' so trying to use any > password to skip pam_opie and login with next pam module. But here > login hangs and there is _no_way_ to login remotely because > pam_opie.so is the top line of pam.conf > > After about 1-2 minutes timeout it just says "Connection closed by 192.168.90.250" > > > *** 4 *** now just a question > > (In case of fix) After 0 or 1 seq. number it should recount from the > beginning, for example from 499, but I think that seed should be > automatically changed in that case for next 500 iterations otherwise > that is not one-time-passwords > > > > So... I think that is not good ... or am I mistaken? > > -- "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mahabharata From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 10:54:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9AE16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CA743FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:54:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E710A72DA3; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:54:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EAA72DA2; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:54:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:54:18 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: frumin In-Reply-To: <20031102190951.GA28874@Astron.Astron> Message-ID: <20031103105248.A86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20031102190951.GA28874@Astron.Astron> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: evolution mail client X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 18:54:19 -0000 On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, frumin wrote: > Hi, I just wanted to know if anyone else is encountering error when > compiling Evolution on FreeBSD 4.8 or 4.9. I have problems compiling e- > util section of this port. It would help to have an error message. bento hasn't recorded a build problem with evolution. I'll try this once I get my ports tree updated. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 12:58:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D4616A4CF; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:58:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (mail.dt.e-technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6284E43FD7; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:58:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.1])6428C12C78; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:58:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id B8B4D99A4D; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:58:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:58:17 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031103205817.GA30799@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, jie@expertcity.com, ansh@expertcity.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: jie@expertcity.com cc: ansh@expertcity.com Subject: HELP: ServerWorks data corruption after 350 MB with BerkeleyDB 4.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 20:58:21 -0000 Hi, I received a bug report against BerkeleyDB 4 that may not be BerkeleyDB related, but a problem with FreeBSD or specific hardware in general. Jie Song (CC'd) reported that writing files with BerkeleyDB (no threading or something) on his ServerWorks machine causes data corruption (detected by BerkeleyDB 4.0 library functions) when the file sizes grow beyond 350 MB. For details, see PR #55252. Jie Song has answered in private mail that the problem persists with both current 4.X and current 5.X FreeBSD versions. Does this ring a bell somewhere? Are there issues with BIOS versions usually used on ServerWorks boards, are there hardware detection/configuration issues in the kernel? Anything known? Thanks in advance, -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 13:09:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A02816A4CE; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F252043FA3; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:09:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA3L8FYl001126; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:08:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hA3L8FZn001125; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:08:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200311032108.hA3L8FZn001125@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <20031103205817.GA30799@merlin.emma.line.org> To: Matthias Andree Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:08:14 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.3 cc: jie@expertcity.com cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HELP: ServerWorks data corruption after 350 MB with BerkeleyDB 4.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:09:59 -0000 It seems Matthias Andree wrote: > Hi, > > I received a bug report against BerkeleyDB 4 that may not be BerkeleyDB > related, but a problem with FreeBSD or specific hardware in general. > > Jie Song (CC'd) reported that writing files with BerkeleyDB (no > threading or something) on his ServerWorks machine causes data > corruption (detected by BerkeleyDB 4.0 library functions) when the file > sizes grow beyond 350 MB. For details, see PR #55252. Jie Song has > answered in private mail that the problem persists with both current 4.X > and current 5.X FreeBSD versions. > > Does this ring a bell somewhere? Are there issues with BIOS versions > usually used on ServerWorks boards, are there hardware > detection/configuration issues in the kernel? Anything known? There are known issues with some Serverworks chips, but we need to now much more details on the HW to tell. the output of pciconf -l from the machine and the output from dmesg would be good starters. -Sĝren From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 13:36:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3836E16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.hotbox.ru (smtp.hotbox.ru [80.68.244.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3FD43F85 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:36:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dergachev@pochta.ru) Received: from fdp2.dergachev.my (ts29-a14.Moscow.dial.rol.ru [212.46.252.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.hotbox.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA3LYmwJ092690 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:35:07 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from dergachev@pochta.ru) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 23:26:45 +0300 From: Dmitry Dergachev To: stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20031103232645.71b09799.dergachev@pochta.ru> Organization: fdp X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: simicq 0.8.3 cannot be built from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dergachev@pochta.ru List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:36:02 -0000 Hi All! alertdialog.cpp: In method `AlertDialog::AlertDialog(QWidget *, bool = false)': alertdialog.cpp:54: invalid use of undefined type `class XOSD' ../mainwin.h:126: forward declaration of `class XOSD' alertdialog.cpp: In method `void AlertDialog::apply(ICQUser *)': alertdialog.cpp:147: invalid use of undefined type `class XOSD' ../mainwin.h:126: forward declaration of `class XOSD' gmake[3]: *** [alertdialog.o] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/simicq/work/sim-0.8.3/sim/ui' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/simicq/work/sim-0.8.3/sim' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/simicq/work/sim-0.8.3' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net/simicq. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/simicq. Please, help me. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 13:57:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D82216A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:57:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from tenebras.com (dnscache.tenebras.com [66.92.188.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78A2543FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:57:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 62296 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 21:57:54 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by laptop.tenebras.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 21:57:54 -0000 Message-ID: <3FA6CF61.2040007@tenebras.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:57:53 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, zh-tw, zh-cn, fr, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Serious bug in 4.9-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:57:55 -0000 Well, this depends on your point of view. A cvsup, buildworld, kernel, installworld causes: sapphire 214> /usr/games/hack Terminal must backspace. -- "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mahabharata From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 14:10:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B636016A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from tenebras.com (dnscache.tenebras.com [66.92.188.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08FD343F3F for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 62513 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 22:10:52 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by laptop.tenebras.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 22:10:52 -0000 Message-ID: <3FA6D26B.8030707@tenebras.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:10:51 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, zh-tw, zh-cn, fr, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <3FA6CF61.2040007@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <3FA6CF61.2040007@tenebras.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Serious bug in 4.9-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:10:53 -0000 Michael Sierchio wrote: > > Well, this depends on your point of view. A cvsup, buildworld, > kernel, installworld causes: > > sapphire 214> /usr/games/hack > Terminal must backspace. > It appears that someone has messed up /usr/share/misc/termcap -- "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mahabharata From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 14:40:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2761B16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CB543FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:40:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9683172DB3; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F8C72DAD; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:40:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:40:38 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: frumin In-Reply-To: <20031102190951.GA28874@Astron.Astron> Message-ID: <20031103144015.D86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20031102190951.GA28874@Astron.Astron> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: evolution mail client X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:40:39 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:40:39 -0000 On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, frumin wrote: > Hi, I just wanted to know if anyone else is encountering error when > compiling Evolution on FreeBSD 4.8 or 4.9. I have problems compiling e- > util section of this port. I wasn't able to reproduce any failure. Evolution built successfully. Perhaps your system is having temperature or memory issues? -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 14:41:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DAD16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:41:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65F643F3F for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:41:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DB36472DA3; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:41:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DF672DA2; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:41:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:41:27 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Michael Sierchio In-Reply-To: <3FA6D26B.8030707@tenebras.com> Message-ID: <20031103144116.B86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <3FA6CF61.2040007@tenebras.com> <3FA6D26B.8030707@tenebras.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious bug in 4.9-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:41:28 -0000 On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > > Well, this depends on your point of view. A cvsup, buildworld, > > kernel, installworld causes: > > > > sapphire 214> /usr/games/hack > > Terminal must backspace. > > > > It appears that someone has messed up /usr/share/misc/termcap Apparently you :) I can't reproduce this. Try reinstalling termcap manually. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 15:06:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B7416A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:06:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from tenebras.com (dnscache.tenebras.com [66.92.188.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2E4A43F93 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:06:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 63283 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 23:06:01 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by laptop.tenebras.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 23:06:01 -0000 Message-ID: <3FA6DF58.4090804@tenebras.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:06:00 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, zh-tw, zh-cn, fr, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug White References: <3FA6CF61.2040007@tenebras.com> <3FA6D26B.8030707@tenebras.com> <20031103144116.B86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20031103144116.B86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious bug in 4.9-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:06:02 -0000 Doug White wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > >>Michael Sierchio wrote: >> >>>Well, this depends on your point of view. A cvsup, buildworld, >>>kernel, installworld causes: >>> >>>sapphire 214> /usr/games/hack >>>Terminal must backspace. >>> >> >>It appears that someone has messed up /usr/share/misc/termcap > > > Apparently you :) > > I can't reproduce this. Try reinstalling termcap manually. I reverted to the one from the previous release. The CVSuped version is the one causing the problem. These are xterm sessions that are done via xforwarding in sshd. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 203413 Nov 3 14:57 termcap MD5 (termcap) = c4228c627c053151a6397951464d0510 /usr/src/share/termcap/termcap.src has a date of Oct 29 This is easily reproducible -- revert to old termcap, it works. Do a make and make install in /usr/src/share/termcap, the behavior appears again. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 15:07:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A3D16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:07:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from janeway.weblabbet.se (gulins.infracom.se [193.201.97.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F06043FBD for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:07:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daniel@hobbit.se) Received: (qmail 56579 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 23:00:39 -0000 Received: from as2-6-8.sp.m.bonet.se (HELO neuromancer) (194.236.106.236) by 192.168.12.11 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 23:00:39 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:07:51 +0100 From: Daniel Gustafson To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20031104000751.0d2b6ebb.daniel@hobbit.se> In-Reply-To: <20031103144116.B86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <3FA6CF61.2040007@tenebras.com> <3FA6D26B.8030707@tenebras.com> <20031103144116.B86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Serious bug in 4.9-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:07:19 -0000 On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:41:27 -0800 (PST) Doug White wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > > > > Well, this depends on your point of view. A cvsup, buildworld, > > > kernel, installworld causes: > > > > > > sapphire 214> /usr/games/hack > > > Terminal must backspace. > > > > > > > It appears that someone has messed up /usr/share/misc/termcap > > Apparently you :) > > I can't reproduce this. Try reinstalling termcap manually. This can be reproduced at a friends server which was updated using the exact procedure stated above. Whether it worked prior to the upgrade I can't tell but I can find out more information on this if someone needs help to resolve it. Sincerely -- Daniel "DeGe" Gustafson - daniel@hobbit.se - CS Student, Mah Sweden -- "The idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas N Adams -- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 15:11:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A5A16A4CF for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from catseye.mine.nu (d154-5-164-0.bchsia.telus.net [154.5.164.0]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D12B743FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:10:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from catseye@catseye.mine.nu) Received: (qmail 17540 invoked by uid 1001); 3 Nov 2003 23:13:39 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:13:39 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: Doug White Message-Id: <20031103151339.01e18b05.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20031103144116.B86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <3FA6CF61.2040007@tenebras.com> <3FA6D26B.8030707@tenebras.com> <20031103144116.B86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious bug in 4.9-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:11:00 -0000 On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:41:27 -0800 (PST) Doug White wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > > > > Well, this depends on your point of view. A cvsup, buildworld, > > > kernel, installworld causes: > > > > > > sapphire 214> /usr/games/hack > > > Terminal must backspace. > > > > > > > It appears that someone has messed up /usr/share/misc/termcap > > Apparently you :) > > I can't reproduce this. I can. FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #1: Sat Nov 1 09:16:30 PST 2003 > Try reinstalling termcap manually. No change. (cd /usr/src/share/termcap; make clean; make; make install; reboot) -Chris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 15:17:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F14416A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:17:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h76n3fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [213.67.148.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4D8C43F3F for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:17:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: (qmail 25140 invoked by uid 1001); 3 Nov 2003 23:17:26 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:17:26 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Michael Sierchio Message-ID: <20031103231726.GA25093@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Sierchio , Doug White , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <3FA6CF61.2040007@tenebras.com> <3FA6D26B.8030707@tenebras.com> <20031103144116.B86138@carver.gumbysoft.com> <3FA6DF58.4090804@tenebras.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FA6DF58.4090804@tenebras.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious bug in 4.9-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:17:31 -0000 On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:06:00PM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Doug White wrote: > >On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > > > >>Michael Sierchio wrote: > >> > >>>Well, this depends on your point of view. A cvsup, buildworld, > >>>kernel, installworld causes: > >>> > >>>sapphire 214> /usr/games/hack > >>>Terminal must backspace. > >>> > >> > >>It appears that someone has messed up /usr/share/misc/termcap > > > > > >Apparently you :) > > > >I can't reproduce this. Try reinstalling termcap manually. > > I reverted to the one from the previous release. The > CVSuped version is the one causing the problem. > > These are xterm sessions that are done via xforwarding in sshd. > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 203413 Nov 3 14:57 termcap > MD5 (termcap) = c4228c627c053151a6397951464d0510 That seems to be identical to the termcap file I have installed. (Except for the mtime of course.) I can't reproduce your problem either. > > /usr/src/share/termcap/termcap.src has a date of Oct 29 Sounds odd. The last time that file was changed in the RELENG_4 branch was in May 2003, and the last time it was changed in -CURRENT was in August 2003. I would think somebody would have noticed the problem by now, if it really was a problem with the termcap file from the cvs repository. > > This is easily reproducible -- revert to old termcap, it > works. Do a make and make install in /usr/src/share/termcap, > the behavior appears again. I am quite certain it is a local problem at your end. What value is your TERM environment variable set to? -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 15:41:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB9E16A4DB for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:41:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from dmz2.unixjunkie.com (adsl-65-70-175-250.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.70.175.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F68440CF for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:41:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from strgout@unixjunkie.com) Received: from mail.unixjunkie.com (mail [10.253.254.36]) by dmz2.unixjunkie.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hA405YGf031427 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:05:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from strgout@mail.unixjunkie.com) Received: from mail.unixjunkie.com (mail [10.253.254.36]) by mail.unixjunkie.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hA405Ymf031424 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:05:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from strgout@mail.unixjunkie.com) Received: (from strgout@localhost) by mail.unixjunkie.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id hA405YcO031423 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:05:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from strgout) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:05:33 -0600 From: John To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031104000519.GA31319@mail.unixjunkie.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: (long) high traffic syslog server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:41:39 -0000 I have some questions about what needs tuned on a high traffic syslog box. I seem to be dropping quite a few syslog packets. This is a syslog server for a high usage Firewall btw. Nic is a Compaq tl0 4.8-P13 netstat -s -p udp | grep buf 19,762,079 dropped due to full socket buffers uptime 5:28PM up 7 days, 18:30, 2 users, load averages: 0.21, 0.23, 0.23 I though maybe syslogd was the problem, but running nc on the syslog port and sending output to /dev/null still shows the buffer problem. i've tried uping net.inet.udp.recvspace if this gets too high i will no longer be able to send udp packets and will get a socket buff full err. net.local.dgram.recvspace This didn't do much. i tried moving kern.ipc.maxsockbuf in by doubling each time This didn't help kern.ipc.maxsockbuf: 1048576 <- This is what it currently is set to. if someone could point me in the right direction that would be great :). here is some info on the box in question. btw all these command were run while the system was doing about 1500 pps (as per netstat -inb 1) kern.maxfilesperproc: 8272 kern.openfiles: 86 btw syslogd runs at %20 cpu from top systat -vm 1 shows disk mostly idle (1-5% usage). this box has 6 9 gig drives in raid5 also. Which i think show up as one drive. /dev/idad0s2a on / (ufs, local) /dev/idad0s2f on /tmp (ufs, local) /dev/idad0s2e on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/idad0s2g on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) ps -axwwj | grep syslogd root 84 1 84 c500e740 0 Rs ?? 1601:25.44 /usr/sbin/syslogd -n ps -axwwu | grep syslogd root 84 18.6 0.1 972 620 ?? Rs 26Oct03 1601:30.54 /usr/sbin/syslogd -n ifconfig tl0 tl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 ether 00:08:c7:9f:78:1e media: Ethernet 100baseTX status: active netstat -inb 1 This can peak at around 2100 pps. low is about 600 pps. packets errs bytes packets errs bytes colls 1568 0 226804 6 0 0 0 1274 0 200785 1 0 178 0 netstat -in Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll tl0 1500 00:08:c7:9f:78:1e 713151669 0 83482 0 0 netstat -s -p udp udp: 711282523 datagrams received 0 with incomplete header 0 with bad data length field 0 with bad checksum 1 with no checksum 306 dropped due to no socket 0 broadcast/multicast datagrams dropped due to no socket 19783694 dropped due to full socket buffers 0 not for hashed pcb 691498523 delivered 20954 datagrams output netstat -m 66/336/81408 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): 66 mbufs allocated to data 64/220/20352 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 524 Kbytes allocated to network (0% of mb_map in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines I was using ipf, but now its disabled (no rules, and ipf -D). top line of.. top CPU states: 9.9% user, 0.0% nice, 9.3% system, 3.3% interrupt, 77.5% idle Mem: 12M Active, 461M Inact, 64M Wired, 25M Cache, 67M Buf, 1076K Free Swap: 768M Total, 112K Used, 768M Free dmesg.boot btw its a dual 400 Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p13 #2: Sun Oct 26 22:47:48 CST 2003 root@ME.MYDOMAIN.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SYSLOG Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 399072197 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (399.07-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x652 Stepping = 2 Features=0x183fbff real memory = 603979776 (589824K bytes) avail memory = 583192576 (569524K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0368000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at 11.0 pcib1: at device 13.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 tl0: port 0x2c00-0x2c0f mem 0xc6efcdf0-0xc6 efcdff irq 5 at device 7.0 on pci1 tl0: Ethernet address: 00:08:c7:9f:78:1e miibus0: on tl0 nsphy0: on miibus0 nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto tlphy0: on miibus0 tlphy0: 10base2/BNC, 10base5/AUI sym0: <875> port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xc6eff000-0xc6efffff,0xc6efcf00-0xc6efcfff i rq 9 at device 9.0 on pci1 sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking sym1: <875> port 0x2400-0x24ff mem 0xc6efe000-0xc6efefff,0xc6efce00-0xc6efceff i rq 10 at device 9.1 on pci1 sym1: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking pci1: (vendor=0x10b8, dev=0x0005) at 10.0 irq 15 pci0: (vendor=0x0e11, dev=0xa0f0) at 14.0 pcib2: at device 15.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 ida0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xb8000000-0xbf ffffff,0xc6ffff00-0xc6ffffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci2 ida0: drives=1 firm_rev=3.08 idad0: on ida0 idad0: 34707MB (71081760 sectors), blocksize=512 isab0: at device 20.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf100-0xf10f at device 20.1 on pci 0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: at 20.2 irq 0 chip1: at device 20.3 on pci0 orm0: