From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 05:41:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131EC16A4CF for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.i4m.be (cust231-226.dsl.versadsl.be [62.166.231.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6D2043D31 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:41:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michael.vanoostende@i4m.be) Message-ID: <006901c40a93$32c68dc0$8601a8c0@SERVER> From: "Michael Van Oostende" To: Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:41:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: AMD 2000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:41:25 -0000 Hello, I want to install freeBSD on my new computer, but am not sure what = version I should use. I got a AMD Athlon XP 2000+. What version do I download? AMD64? or = something else? Kind Regards, Michael Van Oostende From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 05:45:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0775A16A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:45:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from omega.metrics.com (internal.metrics.com [204.138.110.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D24143D31 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:45:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tomh@waterloo.equitrac.com) Received: from syncro.metrics.com ([192.168.96.20]) by omega.metrics.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2FDjt58013213; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:45:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tomh@waterloo.equitrac.com) Received: by SYNCRO with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:44:27 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Haapanen, Tom" To: "'Michael Van Oostende'" Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:44:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.67, clamav-milter version 0.66n X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.14.238 (omega [192.168.96.200]); pass=YES; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:45:56 -0500 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-99.40 required=5.00 X-Spam-Level: cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: AMD 2000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:45:45 -0000 From: Michael Van Oostende [mailto:michael.vanoostende@i4m.be] > I want to install freeBSD on my new computer, but am not sure what > version I should use. > > I got a AMD Athlon XP 2000+. What version do I download? AMD64? > or something else? The i386 version. AMD64 is for Athlon64 and Opteron processors. Tom From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 11:01:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48DE16A4F3 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:01:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE65843D2D for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:01:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FJ1Tbv055867 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:01:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FJ1TOq055859 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:01:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:01:29 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200403151901.i2FJ1TOq055859@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:01:32 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/11/26] amd64/59713 amd64 Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557FB16A4D5 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:30:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A72743D1F for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:30:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id VAA19728 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:30:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from uriah.heep.sax.de (localhost.heep.sax.de [127.0.0.1]) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FKKwst065092 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:20:58 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2FKKwK3065091 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:20:58 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from j) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:20:58 +0100 From: Joerg Wunsch To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040315212058.C63058@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E X-GnuPG-Fingerprint: 5E84 F980 C3CA FD4B B584 1070 F48C A81B 69A8 5873 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=7.5 tests=USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Subject: [kris@obsecurity.org: [ports-amd64@FreeBSD.org: avr-gcc-3.3.2 failed on amd64 5]] X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:30:32 -0000 Just curious: ----- Forwarded message from Kris Kennaway ----- ... *** Configuration amd64-portbld-freebsd5.2 not supported Configure in /tmp/a/ports/devel/avr-gcc/work/gcc-3.3.2/gcc failed, exiting. ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. ----- End forwarded message ----- Since this is a stock GCC 3.3.2 where AMD64 is only used as the host system (--target=avr), and I can't imagine AMD64 is not yet supported by GCC, is there already any experience about what would be needed to configure a GCC on this arch? Kris' guess was it might require to be called x86_64, but perhaps some other maintainer already solved that problem, so I'm just trying to not reinvent the wheel. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 14:38:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60F116A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from dogfood.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E31743D41 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:38:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@jrv.org) Received: from jrv.org ([192.168.3.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by dogfood.jrv.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2FMcAql048491 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:38:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from james@jrv.org) Message-ID: <40563051.3010209@jrv.org> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:38:09 -0600 From: "James R. Van Artsalen" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Wunsch References: <20040315212058.C63058@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <20040315212058.C63058@uriah.heep.sax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [kris@obsecurity.org: [ports-amd64@FreeBSD.org: avr-gcc-3.3.2 failed on amd64 5]] X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:38:35 -0000 Joerg Wunsch wrote: >Just curious: > >----- Forwarded message from Kris Kennaway ----- > >... > >*** Configuration amd64-portbld-freebsd5.2 not supported >Configure in /tmp/a/ports/devel/avr-gcc/work/gcc-3.3.2/gcc failed, exiting. >===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > >----- End forwarded message ----- > >Since this is a stock GCC 3.3.2 where AMD64 is only used as the host >system (--target=avr), and I can't imagine AMD64 is not yet supported >by GCC, is there already any experience about what would be needed to >configure a GCC on this arch? > >Kris' guess was it might require to be called x86_64, but perhaps some >other maintainer already solved that problem, so I'm just trying to >not reinvent the wheel. > > GCC needs to know what the host is in order to know how to calculate constant folding, and how to do other optimizations (think about cross-compiling on a 32-bit platform for a 64-target, doing constant folding etc). The bug is in GCC's config.guess: this file doesn't recognize FreeBSD right. See this message for patch to config.guess: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-amd64/2004-February/000722.html This may not be the only bug but it is a necessary start. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 15:06:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A4316A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E0C43D2D for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:06:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (e3469efe6a175463096dc58ea27525ea@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203])i2FN62uW013648; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:06:03 -0600 (CST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1569951BFB; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:06:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:06:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "James R. Van Artsalen" Message-ID: <20040315230601.GA31834@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040315212058.C63058@uriah.heep.sax.de> <40563051.3010209@jrv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40563051.3010209@jrv.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Joerg Wunsch cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [kris@obsecurity.org: [ports-amd64@FreeBSD.org: avr-gcc-3.3.2 failed on amd64 5]] X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:06:06 -0000 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:38:09PM -0600, James R. Van Artsalen wrote: > >Since this is a stock GCC 3.3.2 where AMD64 is only used as the host > >system (--target=3Davr), and I can't imagine AMD64 is not yet supported > >by GCC, is there already any experience about what would be needed to > >configure a GCC on this arch? > > > >Kris' guess was it might require to be called x86_64, but perhaps some > >other maintainer already solved that problem, so I'm just trying to > >not reinvent the wheel. > >=20 > > > GCC needs to know what the host is in order to know how to calculate=20 > constant folding, and how to do other optimizations (think about=20 > cross-compiling on a 32-bit platform for a 64-target, doing constant=20 > folding etc). >=20 > The bug is in GCC's config.guess: this file doesn't recognize FreeBSD=20 > right. See this message for patch to config.guess: > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-amd64/2004-February/000722= .html >=20 > This may not be the only bug but it is a necessary start. config.{guess,sub} should be patched to recognize amd64 if you define GNU_CONFIGURE. Kris --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAVjbZWry0BWjoQKURAmeDAJ4uiQufDzZHq0w3B9LUwRyQNxYpBQCdG0GS IF6oGEw0YE8fvXnK4LfCyEM= =62ix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 17:40:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9FE16A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:40:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C7243D49 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:40:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ryanmay@telus.net) Received: from RYANS ([66.222.197.112]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.00.05.02 201-2115-109-103-20031105) with ESMTP id <20040316014014.EHHQ25381.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@RYANS> for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:40:14 -0700 From: "Ryan May" To: Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:40:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 thread-index: AcQK96CYsNk6dFkcSLGwXMIz+/SajA== Message-Id: <20040316014014.EHHQ25381.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@RYANS> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Motherboards and Chipsets X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:40:15 -0000 Has anyone had any experience with the AOpen AK86-L motherboard? What about any of the SiS 755 based mobos? Thanks, Ryan From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 23:30:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019D816A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:30:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6A243D1D for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:30:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1B391x-000IFE-My for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:30:29 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:30:29 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Subject: usb keyboard & ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:30:33 -0000 hi, this is an amd64 box (Shuttle FN85), CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (1994.86-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xf48 Stepping = 8 with ULE scheduling things are a bit touchy, 1- make buildworld is ok, but trying -jn usually failes (reprodusable, but not consistant). 2- the usb keybord does not work. with 4BSD scheduling both problems are solved. I have a feeling that the USB keyboard problem is also true for i386-current with some pointers i might be able to help ... danny From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 02:21:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8BC16A4CF for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A944E43D39 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 02:21:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1B3BgK-0007fD-NJ for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:20:21 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:30:29 +0200 . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:20:20 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Subject: Re: usb keyboard & ULE - correction X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:21:18 -0000 ... > 2- the usb keybord does not work. not true: sorry, it seems a XFree86 problem, not ULE/4BSD. danny From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 04:20:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0096F16A4CF for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 04:20:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.31.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C6943D1F for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 04:20:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bauerm@faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de) Received: from faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui1d [131.188.31.34]) id NAA29644 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:20:27 +0100 (CET) Received: (from bauerm@localhost) by faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.3p3/8.1.6-FAU) id NAA09012 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:20:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:20:27 +0100 From: Matthias Bauer To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040316122027.GA9006@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Subject: Siemens/Fujitsu SCALEO 600 A64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:20:30 -0000 Hi, as c't magazine reports ( http://www.heise.de/ct/aktuell/meldung/45580 ), Siemens is selling this amd64 based PC for about 1000 Euros. Anybody tried FreeBSD/amd64 on it? Best regards, Matthias From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 07:30:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3613416A4D3 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:30:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl (galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl [149.156.96.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7CD43D3F for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:30:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl) Received: by galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 640F0AF3A5; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:30:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:30:20 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kowalik To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040316153020.GA11902@uci.agh.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: FreeBSD 5.x and Sun Fire V20z. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:30:22 -0000 Hello, Did anyone ever try (and succeeded) to run FreeBSD on Sun Fire V20z box? Neither google nor this list's archive answers this question, unfortunately (OK, I found one thread here, without any real answer, though). Regards, -- Krzysztof Kowalik, Computer Center, AGH UST. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 16:38:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B6216A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:38:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A878743D1D for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:38:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I0c4fE003398; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:38:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2I0buJL003397; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:37:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:37:56 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040318003756.GB3018@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040315212058.C63058@uriah.heep.sax.de> <40563051.3010209@jrv.org> <20040315230601.GA31834@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040315230601.GA31834@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Joerg Wunsch cc: "James R. Van Artsalen" cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kris@obsecurity.org: [ports-amd64@FreeBSD.org: avr-gcc-3.3.2 failed on amd64 5]] X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:38:05 -0000 On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:06:01PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >Since this is a stock GCC 3.3.2 where AMD64 is only used as the host > > >system (--target=avr), and I can't imagine AMD64 is not yet supported > > >by GCC, is there already any experience about what would be needed to > > >configure a GCC on this arch? ... > config.{guess,sub} should be patched to recognize amd64 if you define > GNU_CONFIGURE. Older GCC's used config.{guess,sub} as expected. Newer ones don't do a full configure before the "make" stage. Newer GCC versions do a minimal configure step, and do the full-fledged config.{guess,sub} as part of the "make" stage. So our ports/Templates/ doesn't work as expected. I thought GCC started this with 3.3, but maybe it was 3.2. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 18:24:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7948116A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3DC43D3F for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:24:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I2Ooqt006021; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:24:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2I2OoT5006020; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:24:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:24:49 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Justin Hopper Message-ID: <20040318022449.GD3018@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <1078985074.3422.157.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <1078997023.22141.27.camel@ip5.ops.uk.psi.com> <1079020986.3422.164.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1079020986.3422.164.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hardware suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 02:24:52 -0000 On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:03:07AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: > I checked out the Newisys 2100, and it actually looks like a better ... > Also, do you happen to have a ballpark figure for how much the 2100 > costs? I hate companies that won't give you a rough price up front, but > instead force you to contact their sales team for a quote >:( Newisys does not sell direct, they are an ODM. Price a Sun V20z http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/v20z/ -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 18:41:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C7116A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:41:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4774343D39 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:41:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lutz.heinrichs@netzero.net) Received: from netzero.net (pcp02876289pcs.wchstr01.pa.comcast.net[68.85.248.101]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2004031802410701400ke76ne>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 02:41:09 +0000 Message-ID: <40590C44.3040604@netzero.net> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:41:08 -0500 From: Lutz Heinrichs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: rs1_fb6a93588de, rs2_f4a7bac7997, rs3_429ccc5d11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <20040316014014.EHHQ25381.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@RYANS> In-Reply-To: <20040316014014.EHHQ25381.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@RYANS> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Motherboards and Chipsets X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 02:41:12 -0000 Ryan May wrote: >Has anyone had any experience with the AOpen AK86-L motherboard? What about >any of the SiS 755 based mobos? > > The AK86-L looks nice. Reviews can be found at http://www.anandtech.com and http://www.hardocp.com and they both were very positive. I'd stick with the VIA or nVIDIA chipsets for the A64, both have their strengths and weaknesses. If you don't want to overclock much, the VIA chipset (found on the AK86-L) probably will serve you best. Lutz From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 20:15:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4567516A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:15:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from bsdhosting.net (bsdhosting.net [65.39.221.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 091AD43D45 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:15:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhopper@bsdhosting.net) Received: (qmail 95965 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 04:15:26 -0000 Received: from bsdhosting.net (HELO ?192.168.1.7?) (jhopper@bsdhosting.net@65.39.221.113) by bsdhosting.net with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 04:15:26 -0000 From: Justin Hopper To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040318022449.GD3018@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <1078985074.3422.157.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <1078997023.22141.27.camel@ip5.ops.uk.psi.com> <1079020986.3422.164.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <20040318022449.GD3018@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1079583333.7127.452.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:15:34 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: hardware suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:15:36 -0000 Hello David, On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 18:24, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:03:07AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: > > I checked out the Newisys 2100, and it actually looks like a better > ... > > Also, do you happen to have a ballpark figure for how much the 2100 > > costs? I hate companies that won't give you a rough price up front, but > > instead force you to contact their sales team for a quote >:( > > Newisys does not sell direct, they are an ODM. Price a Sun V20z > http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/v20z/ Thanks for the tip. I am getting close to wrapping up a deal with Appro on this item: http://www.appro.com/product/server_1122h.asp They have the 4 HDD system for the same price as the 2 HDD system, so that is what I was looking for. Does anyone have any experience with freebsd-amd64 on this hardware? I think http://www.pogolinux.com is using similar hardware for their A64 offer, but their price seems to be consistently higher than other vendors (I do like dealing with local vendors though). -- Justin Hopper UNIX Systems Engineer BSDHosting.net Hosting Division of Digital Oasys Inc. http://www.bsdhosting.net From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 20:36:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FC116A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from logan.com (logan.com [207.170.160.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B9643D45 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:36:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Rob@Logan.com) Received: from [67.20.112.52] (account rob HELO Logan.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 3084097 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:36:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4059273A.5050903@Logan.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:36:10 -0500 From: Rob Logan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <1078985074.3422.157.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <1078997023.22141.27.camel@ip5.ops.uk.psi.com> <1079020986.3422.164.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <20040318022449.GD3018@dragon.nuxi.com> <1079583333.7127.452.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> In-Reply-To: <1079583333.7127.452.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: hardware suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:36:16 -0000 >>http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/v20z/ >http://www.appro.com/product/server_1122h.asp >http://www.pogolinux.com how important is remote management to you? the newisys sun v20z has an embedded PowerPC running linux/apache on its own IP to watch over the server.. http://www.newisys.com/products/system_management.pdf From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 21:10:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25E716A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:10:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17BA43D3F for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:10:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2I5APQK025004; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:10:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2I5APoB025003; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:10:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:10:25 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Justin Hopper Message-ID: <20040318051025.GA24943@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <1078985074.3422.157.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <1078997023.22141.27.camel@ip5.ops.uk.psi.com> <1079020986.3422.164.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <20040318022449.GD3018@dragon.nuxi.com> <1079583333.7127.452.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1079583333.7127.452.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hardware suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 05:10:27 -0000 On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 08:15:34PM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: > Thanks for the tip. I am getting close to wrapping up a deal with Appro > on this item: > > http://www.appro.com/product/server_1122h.asp > > They have the 4 HDD system for the same price as the 2 HDD system, so > that is what I was looking for. > > Does anyone have any experience with freebsd-amd64 on this hardware? This machine uses the Tyan K8SR motherboard. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 21:28:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEA516A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from bsdhosting.net (bsdhosting.net [65.39.221.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45BD143D41 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:28:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhopper@bsdhosting.net) Received: (qmail 7144 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 05:28:15 -0000 Received: from bsdhosting.net (HELO ?192.168.1.7?) (jhopper@bsdhosting.net@65.39.221.113) by bsdhosting.net with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 05:28:15 -0000 From: Justin Hopper To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4059273A.5050903@Logan.com> References: <1078985074.3422.157.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <1078997023.22141.27.camel@ip5.ops.uk.psi.com> <1079020986.3422.164.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <20040318022449.GD3018@dragon.nuxi.com> <1079583333.7127.452.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <4059273A.5050903@Logan.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1079587703.7127.533.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:28:23 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: hardware suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 05:28:24 -0000 On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 20:36, Rob Logan wrote: > >>http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/v20z/ > >http://www.appro.com/product/server_1122h.asp > >http://www.pogolinux.com > > how important is remote management to you? > the newisys sun v20z has an embedded PowerPC > running linux/apache on its own IP to watch > over the server.. > http://www.newisys.com/products/system_management.pdf I think remote management is a nice feature. We have two Sun boxes that run our primary and secondary nameservers, and the LOM has been very useful during the first couple days of setting them up, but after that, we haven't had to touch them in the last 485 days. However, we have easy access to our datacenter here so remote management isn't all that important for us. Still a good feature for many I'm sure. -- Justin Hopper UNIX Systems Engineer BSDHosting.net Hosting Division of Digital Oasys Inc. http://www.bsdhosting.net From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 22:16:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10DF16A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:16:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from webhost.webcrossing.com (webhost.webcrossing.com [208.185.150.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D0C643D1D for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:15:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jsoule@scraprap.com) Received: from adsl-68-120-249-249.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [68.120.249.249] by webhost.webcrossing.com; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:15:56 -0800 From: Jeff Soule Organization: ScrapRap To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:12:41 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403172212.41578.jsoule@scraprap.com> Subject: Tyan S2882UG3NR X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:16:01 -0000 Greetings, I have ordered a Tyan S2882UG3NR Motherboard, processors, and 4Gig of RAM for development. After ordering (I know I should have checked first) I saw one person that had problems with the onboard SCSI controllor. I could not find where or if this problem was resolved. Since this is supposed to be a Tier 1 controller I am hoping that it has been... So my questions are: Has this problem been fixed, and if so is it in 5.2.1 If it has been fixed but not in the 5.2.1 release, how can I get it installed. As a side note: Much of what our developers will be working on is a highly threaded application. I want to make sure that if we run into any SMP threading issues that I get enough information to you guys. Any pointers beyond the normal debug kernel and large enough swap space for kernel dumps would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance! /Jeff From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 05:29:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E206416A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 05:29:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.uk.psi.com (mail.uk.psi.com [154.8.2.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5B943D2F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 05:29:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alan.barrow@psineteurope.com) Received: from camdev-01.ops.uk.psi.com ([154.8.22.17]) by mail.uk.psi.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B3xZg-0003LX-00; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:28:40 +0000 From: alan barrow To: Jeff Soule In-Reply-To: <200403172212.41578.jsoule@scraprap.com> References: <200403172212.41578.jsoule@scraprap.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-9.7x.1) Date: 18 Mar 2004 13:28:40 +0000 Message-Id: <1079616520.9310.234.camel@camdev-01.ops.uk.psi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 cc: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Tyan S2882UG3NR X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:29:48 -0000 Dude :) Well the saga was worthy of a film, everyone got involved, suppliers tyan UK, tyan tw, tyan support DE, the issue we had can be reduced to the following:- System came - BIOS 1.01 / incorrect PCI-X riser. || Riser replaced with the correct one the LSI raid jumps into life and we solve our routing table problems. BIOS version, installed 2.00 and the LSI behaved well with the Adaptec turned off. SMDC card, after trying multiple BIOS versions and images for the SMDC tyan UK got a similar system going in a lab, but without COMM2 re-direct over COMM2 port. We have shipped the machine back as we may have a case of :- a) Early board / s. b) Mismatch of MB BIOS & SMDC images. 5.2.1. We have so far had no issues, I have rebuild the kernel and the system is running flow-tools, rrd and apache. We have had no issues with the OS as of yet. Hope this helps, in general we have canned the ZC adaptec board and are going for the plain MB. yours a.r.b. On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 06:12, Jeff Soule wrote: > Greetings, > > I have ordered a Tyan S2882UG3NR Motherboard, processors, and 4Gig of RAM for > development. After ordering (I know I should have checked first) I saw one > person that had problems with the onboard SCSI controllor. I could not find > where or if this problem was resolved. Since this is supposed to be a Tier 1 > controller I am hoping that it has been... > > So my questions are: > Has this problem been fixed, and if so is it in 5.2.1 > If it has been fixed but not in the 5.2.1 release, how can I get it installed. > > As a side note: Much of what our developers will be working on is a highly > threaded application. I want to make sure that if we run into any SMP > threading issues that I get enough information to you guys. Any pointers > beyond the normal debug kernel and large enough swap space for kernel dumps > would be highly appreciated. > > Thanks in advance! > /Jeff > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 09:24:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C08B16A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:24:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from webhost.webcrossing.com (webhost.webcrossing.com [208.185.150.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87D8043D41 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:24:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jsoule@scraprap.com) Received: from adsl-68-120-249-249.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [68.120.249.249] by webhost.webcrossing.com; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:24:04 -0800 From: Jeff Soule Organization: ScrapRap To: alan barrow Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:20:54 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <200403172212.41578.jsoule@scraprap.com> <1079616520.9310.234.camel@camdev-01.ops.uk.psi.com> In-Reply-To: <1079616520.9310.234.camel@camdev-01.ops.uk.psi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200403180920.54919.jsoule@scraprap.com> cc: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Tyan S2882UG3NR X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:24:06 -0000 Thanks! I think this will help. Fortunately the Motherboard has been back-ordered= =20 until April (Can't believe a backorder is fortunate) So this can give me th= e=20 opportunity to cancel the order and get something else. This leaves me wit= h=20 the question of what I should get, or if I should just move forward with wh= at=20 I assume will be a newer rev of the board. I need onboard SCSI, NIC, video, dual processor, and to be able to run 12 G= ig=20 RAM eventually. Any suggestions would be highly appreciated :-) Thanks again for your help! /Jeff On Thursday 18 March 2004 05:28 am, you wrote: > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0a) Early board / s. > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0b) Mismatch of MB BIOS & SMDC images. > > 5.2.1. We have so far had no issues, I have rebuild the kernel and the > system is running flow-tools, rrd and apache. We have had no issues with > the OS as of yet. > > > Hope this helps, in general we have canned the ZC adaptec board and are > going for the plain MB. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 09:38:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A5516A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:38:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C25C43D1F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:38:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IHcPLQ051360; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:38:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2IHcOcV051359; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:38:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:38:24 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jeff Soule Message-ID: <20040318173824.GA51196@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200403172212.41578.jsoule@scraprap.com> <1079616520.9310.234.camel@camdev-01.ops.uk.psi.com> <200403180920.54919.jsoule@scraprap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403180920.54919.jsoule@scraprap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Tyan S2882UG3NR X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:38:26 -0000 On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:20:54AM -0800, Jeff Soule wrote: > I need onboard SCSI, NIC, video, dual processor, and to be able to run 12 Gig > RAM eventually. Any suggestions would be highly appreciated :-) The only three Taiwan boards I know of that fit this bill are the Tyan K8S-Pro (w/SCSI option), Tyan K8SR (w/SCSI option), the just announced MSI MS-9161 K8D-Master3 (*12* DIMM slots!). http://www.amdboard.com/msi_k8d_master3.html From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 12:57:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDD816A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:57:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD2543D39 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:57:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IKvYvK017160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:57:34 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i2IKvTaG009653; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:57:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16474.3385.162450.35538@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:57:29 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Subject: great work! X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:57:35 -0000 My wife's Opteron 146 (Asus SK8V) just arrived last night. The process of installing 5.2.1 from ISO, and then updating to -current was totally painless. XFree86 even worked on the first try. Great job guys! Drew From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 13:07:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D356C16A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:07:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710A143D1D for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:07:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2IL7YvK018972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:07:34 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i2IL7TRA009667; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:07:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16474.3985.214325.22127@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:07:29 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Subject: freebsd32 organization? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:07:35 -0000 What's the "standard" way of installing 32-bit freebsd libraries so as to be able to run a 32-bit binary? What I did was to copy ld-elf.so.1 from a 4.9 machine to /libexec/ld-elf-32.so.1, and then copy the 4.9 libs to a lib32 directory, and then launch 32-bit binaries with a wrapper script that sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to lib32. This is a total hack, and I assume there must be a better way. FWIW, I'm doing this because firefox (built from ports cvsupped today) exits randomly, so I'm running mozilla built on a 4.9 box.. Thanks, Drew From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 16:57:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2741B16A4CE; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:57:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D1643D1D; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:57:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 366F87303A; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:57:33 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040319005733.366F87303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:57:33 -0500 (EST) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:57:34 -0000 TB --- 2004-03-18 23:29:30 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-03-18 23:29:30 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-18 23:29:30 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-03-18 23:29:30 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-18 23:29:30 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-03-18 23:35:46 - Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /home/tinderbox/bin/tinderbox line 544. TB --- 2004-03-18 23:35:46 - building world (CFLAGS={'CFLAGS'}) TB --- 2004-03-18 23:35:46 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-18 23:35:46 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-03-19 00:56:34 - building generic kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2004-03-19 00:56:34 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-19 00:56:34 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Fri Mar 19 00:56:35 GMT 2004 >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >>> stage 3.2: building everything [...] awk -f /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/kern/linker_if.m -c ; cc -c -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestandi ng -Werror linker_if.c cc -c -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/cam/cam.c cc -c -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c In file included from /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c:41: /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h: In function `BUF_KERNPROC': /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-03-19 00:57:32 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-03-19 00:57:32 - ERROR: failed to build generic kernel TB --- 2004-03-19 00:57:32 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 05:30:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9598216A4CE; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:30:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F51443D46; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:30:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 7BC637303A; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:30:36 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040319133036.7BC637303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:30:36 -0500 (EST) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:30:40 -0000 TB --- 2004-03-19 12:04:22 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-03-19 12:04:22 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-19 12:04:22 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-03-19 12:04:22 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-19 12:04:22 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-03-19 12:09:33 - Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /home/tinderbox/bin/tinderbox line 544. TB --- 2004-03-19 12:09:33 - building world (CFLAGS={'CFLAGS'}) TB --- 2004-03-19 12:09:33 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-19 12:09:33 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-03-19 13:28:44 - building generic kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2004-03-19 13:28:44 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-19 13:28:44 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Fri Mar 19 13:28:45 GMT 2004 >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >>> stage 3.2: building everything [...] awk -f /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/kern/linker_if.m -c ; cc -c -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestandi ng -Werror linker_if.c cc -c -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/cam/cam.c cc -c -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c In file included from /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c:41: /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h: In function `BUF_KERNPROC': /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-03-19 13:30:36 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-03-19 13:30:36 - ERROR: failed to build generic kernel TB --- 2004-03-19 13:30:36 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 09:26:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF41716A4CE; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:26:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B078B43D2D; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:26:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JHQ5i5022727; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:26:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2JHQ1dB022722; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:26:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:26:00 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: des@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040319172600.GA19851@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040319133036.7BC637303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040319133036.7BC637303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:26:06 -0000 On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:30:36AM -0500, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: ... > cc -c -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c > In file included from /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/cam/cam_periph.c:41: > /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h: In function `BUF_KERNPROC': > /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/sys/buf.h:353: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > *** Error code 1 Hi DES, Is it possible to use the default COPTFLAGS for AMD64? The default is now -O2. Which becomes "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing" due to . if ${COPTFLAGS:M-O[23s]} != "" in kern.pre.mk. I'm courious why you're not getting -fno-strict-aliasing when you set the tenderbox run up for -O2. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 09:42:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8732F16A4CE; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294B643D31; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:42:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 9C6705309; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 31B735308; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:42:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id B922133CA7; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:42:27 +0100 (CET) To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <20040319133036.7BC637303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040319172600.GA19851@dragon.nuxi.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:42:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040319172600.GA19851@dragon.nuxi.com> (David O'Brien's message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:26:00 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:42:37 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > Is it possible to use the default COPTFLAGS for AMD64? The default is > now -O2. Which becomes "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing" due to > . if ${COPTFLAGS:M-O[23s]} !=3D "" > in kern.pre.mk. I'm courious why you're not getting -fno-strict-aliasing > when you set the tenderbox run up for -O2. Because kern.pre.mk doesn't do what you think it does: .if ${CC} =3D=3D "icc" COPTFLAGS?=3D-O .elif ${MACHINE_ARCH} =3D=3D "amd64" COPTFLAGS?=3D-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -frename-registers -pipe .else COPTFLAGS?=3D-O -pipe . if ${COPTFLAGS:M-O[23s]} !=3D "" COPTFLAGS+=3D -fno-strict-aliasing . endif .endif .if !defined(NO_CPU_COPTFLAGS) . if ${CC} =3D=3D "icc" COPTFLAGS+=3D ${_ICC_CPUCFLAGS:C/(-x[^M^K^W]+)[MKW]+|-x[MKW]+/\1/} . else COPTFLAGS+=3D ${_CPUCFLAGS} . endif .endif note that if ${COPTFLAGS:M-O[23s]} !=3D "" only applies in the non-amd64 case. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 09:44:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4C316A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:44:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB35743D2F for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:44:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) i2JHi2Vk004899; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:44:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20040319121143.GF5434@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040319121143.GF5434@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vTxPBHSqyKTs8khCVmNe" Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. Message-Id: <1079718266.780.9.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:44:26 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mozilla 1.7 amd64 errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:44:01 -0000 --=-vTxPBHSqyKTs8khCVmNe Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 07:11, Kris Kennaway wrote: > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/mozilla-1.7.a_2,2.log > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/mozilla-gtk1-1.7.a_1.lo= g >=20 > Are these ports missing some of the standard patches, or is this a new bu= g? Since the patches line up with mozilla, and mozilla built, I'd have to say this is a new bug. Perhaps the amd64 people can shed some light on this. Joe >=20 > Kris --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-vTxPBHSqyKTs8khCVmNe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAWzF6b2iPiv4Uz4cRAq94AJ9+hRebdGeHslXkVx6J/nQnm19/8QCfSmxR GB6bmeYB/RfwUV8k9rm9K3s= =ZE79 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vTxPBHSqyKTs8khCVmNe-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 10:03:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D278F16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A1143D3F for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JI3Nmb037857; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2JI3Nn2037856; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:23 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040319180322.GA37731@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040319133036.7BC637303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040319172600.GA19851@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:03:29 -0000 On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 06:42:27PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > Is it possible to use the default COPTFLAGS for AMD64? The default is > > now -O2. Which becomes "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing" due to > > . if ${COPTFLAGS:M-O[23s]} != "" > > in kern.pre.mk. I'm courious why you're not getting -fno-strict-aliasing > > when you set the tenderbox run up for -O2. > > Because kern.pre.mk doesn't do what you think it does: ... > note that if ${COPTFLAGS:M-O[23s]} != "" only applies in the non-amd64 > case. The new revision does. :-) So I guess that means the tenderbox run error will go away on the next run (or two)? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 10:27:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F3416A4CE; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:27:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378A043D3F; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:27:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id E17605309; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:27:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 324AE5308; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:27:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id A69A533CA7; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:27:50 +0100 (CET) To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <20040319133036.7BC637303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040319172600.GA19851@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040319180322.GA37731@dragon.nuxi.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:27:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040319180322.GA37731@dragon.nuxi.com> (David O'Brien's message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:23 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:27:59 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > The new revision does. :-) So I guess that means the tenderbox run error > will go away on the next run (or two)? It should pull in 1.47 in time for the next run, which starts in ~2.5 hours. My personal opinion, should anyone care, is that we should fix the bugs rather than silence the warnings... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 11:54:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2833516A514 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:53:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357A143D2F for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:53:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/3.67) with ESMTP id i2JJrtJx025091 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:53:55 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: amd64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:53:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200403192053.55584.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Subject: A different buildworld failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:54:00 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 =46or some time now (a week?), make buildworld on my machine has been baili= ng=20 out with /mnt/sys/CURRENT/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix/pam_unix.c:262: multiple=20 definition of `pam_sm_chauthtok' =2E./modules/pam_deny/libpam_deny.a(pam_deny.o):/mnt/sys/CURRENT/src/lib/li= bpam/mo dules/pam_deny/pam_deny.c:72: first defined here ld: Warning: size of symbol `pam_sm_chauthtok' changed from 25 to 1977=20 in ../modules/pam_unix/libpam_unix.a(pam_unix.o) that, and lots of other similar messages. Any ideas what's going on there? = I=20 don't _think_ I'm saving any weird bits of the old world - I do run=20 cleanworld before makeworld. Any ideas? On a totally unrelated note, GENERIC has got every bizzarre device under th= e=20 sun in it, including urio, but ucom seems left out (I've got revision 1.404= )=20 =2D - is that intentional? It is kind of essential for Palm handhelds. =2D --=20 pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot Would you like a freem? =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAW0/TdqzuAf6io/4RAmxPAJwNGf8cwAuugXgXH8djXdelnrNc8ACeLMf3 KGmZ5enJMavYQvJGBnVIqrs=3D =3DjlrQ =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 13:32:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D38516A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:32:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAF343D1D for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:32:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JLWmfg054401; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:32:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2JLWlW2054400; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:32:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:32:47 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040319213247.GB54209@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040319133036.7BC637303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040319172600.GA19851@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040319180322.GA37731@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:32:53 -0000 On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 07:27:50PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > My personal opinion, should anyone care, is that we should fix the > bugs rather than silence the warnings... Agreed, but I think the current situation is a really good first step. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 13:45:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2741D16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:45:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0871B43D1D for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:45:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JLjD0G054671; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:45:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2JLjCOG054670; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:45:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:45:12 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Adriaan de Groot Message-ID: <20040319214512.GA54549@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200403192053.55584.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403192053.55584.adridg@cs.kun.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A different buildworld failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:45:18 -0000 On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:53:50PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > /mnt/sys/CURRENT/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix/pam_unix.c:262: multiple > definition of `pam_sm_chauthtok' > ../modules/pam_deny/libpam_deny.a(pam_deny.o):/mnt/sys/CURRENT/src/lib/libpam/mo > dules/pam_deny/pam_deny.c:72: first defined here > ld: Warning: size of symbol `pam_sm_chauthtok' changed from 25 to 1977 > in ../modules/pam_unix/libpam_unix.a(pam_unix.o) > > that, and lots of other similar messages. Any ideas what's going on there? I > don't _think_ I'm saving any weird bits of the old world - I do run > cleanworld before makeworld. You're linking in two objects that define the same symbol. Maybe you have old libs laying around, maybe you did a 'make -DNOCLEAN'. You've seen the tenderbox builds don't have this problem, nor do I on 3 different machines. > On a totally unrelated note, GENERIC has got every bizzarre device under the > sun in it, including urio, but ucom seems left out (I've got revision 1.404) > - - is that intentional? It is kind of essential for Palm handhelds. Probably not. The amd64 GENERIC is kept fairly in sync with the i386 one. I'm guessing the i386 GENERIC doesn't have 'ucom' eihter. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 15:10:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02B816A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:10:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C815E43D2F for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:10:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/3.67) with ESMTP id i2JNA7Jx018006 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:10:07 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:10:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51 References: <200403192053.55584.adridg@cs.kun.nl> <20040319214512.GA54549@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040319214512.GA54549@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200403200010.07287.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Subject: Re: A different buildworld failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 23:10:09 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 19 March 2004 22:45, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:53:50PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > that, and lots of other similar messages. Any ideas what's going on > > there? I don't _think_ I'm saving any weird bits of the old world - I do > > run cleanworld before makeworld. > > You're linking in two objects that define the same symbol. Maybe you > have old libs laying around, maybe you did a 'make -DNOCLEAN'. You've Well I can see _that_. I'll have to experiment a little, perhaps having=20 CFLAGS=3D-g -fPIC in make.conf isn't such a bright idea - other than that, = rm=20 =2D -rf /usr/obj ; make cleanworld buildworld keeps on giving up at this sa= me=20 place. > seen the tenderbox builds don't have this problem, nor do I on 3 > different machines. Well, that assumes the tinderboxes get far enough to try to _build_ pam.=20 Anyway, let's not quibble on a friday night. I can see that several of the= =20 pam modules in contrib/openpam/modules contain pam_sm_chauthtok: /pam_deny/pam_deny.c:pam_sm_chauthtok(pam_handle_t *pamh, int flags, =2E/pam_permit/pam_permit.c:pam_sm_chauthtok(pam_handle_t *pamh, int flags, =2E/pam_unix/pam_unix.c:pam_sm_chauthtok(pam_handle_t *pamh, int flags, after which in openpam/lib/ it tries to link everything together in a stati= c=20 lib: ld -o openpam_static_modules.o -r --whole-archive=20 openpam_static.o ../modules/pam_chroot/libpam_chroot.a ../modules/pam_deny/= libpam_deny.a ../modules/pam_echo/libpam_echo.a ../modules/pam_exec/libpam_= exec.a ../modules/pam_ftpusers/libpam_ftpusers.a ../modules/pam_group/libpa= m_group.a ../modules/pam_guest/libpam_guest.a ../modules/pam_krb5/libpam_kr= b5.a ../modules/pam_ksu/libpam_ksu.a ../modules/pam_lastlog/libpam_lastlog.= a ../modules/pam_login_access/libpam_login_access.a ../modules/pam_nologin/= libpam_nologin.a ../modules/pam_opie/libpam_opie.a ../modules/pam_opieacces= s/libpam_opieaccess.a ../modules/pam_passwdqc/libpam_passwdqc.a ../modules/= pam_permit/libpam_permit.a ../modules/pam_radius/libpam_radius.a ../modules= /pam_rhosts/libpam_rhosts.a ../modules/pam_rootok/libpam_rootok.a ../module= s/pam_securetty/libpam_securetty.a ../modules/pam_self/libpam_self.a ../mod= ules/pam_ssh/libpam_ssh.a ../modules/pam_tacplus/libpam_tacplus.a ../module= s/pam_unix/libpam_unix.a which of course pulls in those multiple definitions.=20 > Probably not. The amd64 GENERIC is kept fairly in sync with the i386 > one. I'm guessing the i386 GENERIC doesn't have 'ucom' eihter. Indeed, none of them have ucom. Weird. =2D --=20 pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot Would you like a freem? =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAW33PdqzuAf6io/4RAmv8AJ9NxbB2Gl/8VIByBLP0ruqIzZOzNwCfUw8e enmxXc7sj74OZlAu/eHkTjc=3D =3Dpg1u =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 17:09:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D04B16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:09:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F52643D1F for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:09:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E332A904 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:09:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F297EE296 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:09:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2K18qLi056892; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:08:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2K18qPW056891; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:08:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:08:51 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <200403192053.55584.adridg@cs.kun.nl> <20040319214512.GA54549@dragon.nuxi.com> <200403200010.07287.adridg@cs.kun.nl> In-Reply-To: <200403200010.07287.adridg@cs.kun.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403191708.51922.peter@wemm.org> cc: Adriaan de Groot Subject: Re: A different buildworld failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:09:39 -0000 On Friday 19 March 2004 03:10 pm, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Friday 19 March 2004 22:45, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:53:50PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > > that, and lots of other similar messages. Any ideas what's going > > > on there? I don't _think_ I'm saving any weird bits of the old > > > world - I do run cleanworld before makeworld. > > > > You're linking in two objects that define the same symbol. Maybe > > you have old libs laying around, maybe you did a 'make -DNOCLEAN'. > > You've > > Well I can see _that_. I'll have to experiment a little, perhaps > having CFLAGS=-g -fPIC in make.conf isn't such a bright idea - other > than that, rm -rf /usr/obj ; make cleanworld buildworld keeps on > giving up at this same place. Argh!! If you're trying to compile everything with -fPIC, then you deserve what you get. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 17:13:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381C016A4CE; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:13:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E5143D2F; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:13:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20FA2A901; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:13:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850A6E259; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:13:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2K1CZIW065572; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:12:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2K1CUXf065364; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:12:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:12:30 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040319121143.GF5434@xor.obsecurity.org> <1079718266.780.9.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <1079718266.780.9.camel@gyros> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403191712.30481.peter@wemm.org> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: mozilla 1.7 amd64 errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:13:22 -0000 On Friday 19 March 2004 09:44 am, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 07:11, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/mozilla-1.7.a_2,2 > >.log > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/mozilla-gtk1-1.7. > >a_1.log > > > > Are these ports missing some of the standard patches, or is this a > > new bug? > > Since the patches line up with mozilla, and mozilla built, I'd have > to say this is a new bug. Perhaps the amd64 people can shed some > light on this. Looks like a new bug: c++ -o nsDirectoryService.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD5\" -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -D_IMPL_NS_COM -I.. -I../../dist/include/string -I../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../dist/include -I/tmp/a/ports/www/mozilla-devel/work/mozilla/dist/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -O -pipe -fshort-wchar -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../mozilla-config.h nsDirectoryService.cpp In file included from nsLocalFile.h:63, from nsDirectoryService.cpp:42: nsLocalFileUnix.h:62:1: warning: "STATFS" redefined nsLocalFileUnix.h:54:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:530: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:539: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:580: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:589: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:804: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:813: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I don't recall ever seeing these from mozilla before. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 17:13:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381C016A4CE; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:13:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E5143D2F; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:13:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20FA2A901; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:13:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850A6E259; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:13:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2K1CZIW065572; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:12:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2K1CUXf065364; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:12:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:12:30 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040319121143.GF5434@xor.obsecurity.org> <1079718266.780.9.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <1079718266.780.9.camel@gyros> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403191712.30481.peter@wemm.org> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: mozilla 1.7 amd64 errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:13:22 -0000 On Friday 19 March 2004 09:44 am, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 07:11, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/mozilla-1.7.a_2,2 > >.log > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/mozilla-gtk1-1.7. > >a_1.log > > > > Are these ports missing some of the standard patches, or is this a > > new bug? > > Since the patches line up with mozilla, and mozilla built, I'd have > to say this is a new bug. Perhaps the amd64 people can shed some > light on this. Looks like a new bug: c++ -o nsDirectoryService.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD5\" -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -D_IMPL_NS_COM -I.. -I../../dist/include/string -I../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../dist/include -I/tmp/a/ports/www/mozilla-devel/work/mozilla/dist/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -O -pipe -fshort-wchar -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../mozilla-config.h nsDirectoryService.cpp In file included from nsLocalFile.h:63, from nsDirectoryService.cpp:42: nsLocalFileUnix.h:62:1: warning: "STATFS" redefined nsLocalFileUnix.h:54:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:530: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:539: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:580: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:589: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:804: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' {standard input}:813: Warning: indirect jmp without `*' ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I don't recall ever seeing these from mozilla before. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 17:57:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E74716A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:57:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A98943D2D for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:57:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7272A90B for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:57:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F0DE296 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:57:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2K1ua4k095058; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:56:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2K1uZ5O095057; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:56:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:56:35 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <16474.3985.214325.22127@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <16474.3985.214325.22127@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403191756.35502.peter@wemm.org> cc: Andrew Gallatin Subject: Re: freebsd32 organization? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:57:26 -0000 On Thursday 18 March 2004 01:07 pm, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > What's the "standard" way of installing 32-bit freebsd libraries > so as to be able to run a 32-bit binary? > > What I did was to copy ld-elf.so.1 from a 4.9 machine to > /libexec/ld-elf-32.so.1, and then copy the 4.9 libs > to a lib32 directory, and then launch 32-bit binaries > with a wrapper script that sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to lib32. > > This is a total hack, and I assume there must be a better way. The are better ways, the best is probably to grab the ld-elf-32.so.1 from http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/ld-elf-32.so.1 I do have a slightly more refined system in the p4 tree, but it is still an evil hack. I think I've figured out how to get the tree impact down to an acceptable level. I've split out the 32 bit libraries part of my current WIP. You can see it here: http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/lib32.diff Note that there is one small kernel diff there. You use this by doing a buildworld/installworld, and after that is finished, run the build32.sh script. That sets up a temporary include tree, builds 32 bit libraries, installs them, and builds a ld-elf32.so.1. You can set paths for it via the "-32" flag to ldconfig. > FWIW, I'm doing this because firefox (built from ports cvsupped > today) exits randomly, so I'm running mozilla built on a 4.9 box.. This is a libpthread problem, for reasons I haven't been able to track down yet. The best cheat method is to use libmap to translate all the libpthread.so.1 references to libc_r.so.5. It turns out to be quite robust with libc_r. The libpthread problem appears to be the good old misaligned stack problem lurking somewhere. I'll be tackling this next. I do recommend using the 64 bit firefox though, it is rock solid with libc_r. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 20 01:53:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D546916A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:53:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FE143D31 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:53:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/3.67) with ESMTP id i2K9rEJx013023 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:53:14 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:53:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51 References: <200403192053.55584.adridg@cs.kun.nl> <200403200010.07287.adridg@cs.kun.nl> <200403191708.51922.peter@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200403191708.51922.peter@wemm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200403201053.14483.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Subject: Re: A different buildworld failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:53:16 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 20 March 2004 02:08, Peter Wemm wrote: > On Friday 19 March 2004 03:10 pm, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > Well I can see _that_. I'll have to experiment a little, perhaps > > having CFLAGS=3D-g -fPIC in make.conf isn't such a bright idea - other > > than that, rm -rf /usr/obj ; make cleanworld buildworld keeps on > > giving up at this same place. > > Argh!! If you're trying to compile everything with -fPIC, then you > deserve what you get. Point taken, act of contrition, etc. Will try to avoid the elephant-gun=20 approach next time a port requires -fPIC to compile (well, in this case it= =20 was perl, whose interpreter I wanted to embed in a .so). =2D --=20 pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot Would you like a freem? =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAXBSKdqzuAf6io/4RAvq5AJ0RiojjRIDqKq/7/dUu4yTkyp0FNgCfWKvJ KPx2O7wY34AXRCdrop0+8m8=3D =3DAScF =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 20 12:21:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D9916A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:21:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F6343D2F for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:21:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE822A907 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:21:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4969E259 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:21:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2KKKa4m046588 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:20:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2KKKaSh046587 for amd64@freebsd.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:20:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: amd64@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:20:36 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_UeKXAY7r8NP41z7" Message-Id: <200403201220.36148.peter@wemm.org> Subject: Heads up.. bug fix in the pipeline... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:21:24 -0000 --Boundary-00=_UeKXAY7r8NP41z7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I have a pending commit that is going to cause quite a bit of impact.. The problem is that several bugs in the stack alignment code have conspired to cause subtle explosions at hard-to-track times. I'm pretty sure these are the cause of the ogg123 crashes, for example. Here's what was wrong.. 1) the /usr/lib/crti.o and crtn.o files did not have the correct stack alignment conventions. 2) ld-elf.so.1 called its startup routine (_rtld()) with the wrong stack alignment. Since _rtld() loads the libraries and calls their _init functions (which come from crti/crtn.o), the two wrongs made a right and the constructors were accidently called with the right alignment. 3) _rtld_bind() in ld-elf.so.1 was called with the wrong alignment. It has callbacks into libpthread for the locking. Depending on kse thread state, it could blow up. I think this was the specific cause of the ogg123 bug. 4) dlopen() and dlclose() were called with the right alignment, but since _init/_fini() were wrong, any constructors called from there would be called with the wrong alignment. Even if it was the same libraries that worked by accident in 2) above. 5) _fini() was always called with the wrong alignment. The good news is that the fixes are small. The bad news is that crti/crtn.o are linked into *every single shared library!*. Any libraries that contain C++ code and use static constructors will need to be recompiled after ld-elf.so.1 is fixed (since one of the double-wrongs in 2) wll be corrected, leaving a single wrong). So. that means that the fix will make some things magically start working after a 'make world'. And it might break a few things from ports. A recompile (portupgrade -f) should fix it. I don't know of a good way to detect shared libraries that have static constructors or not. But it shouldn't be hard to decode objdump etc. Anyway, I'm planning to commit these fixes soon, after I've finished testing to make sure that nothing new breaks. FYI, the change so far is attached.. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 --Boundary-00=_UeKXAY7r8NP41z7 Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="us-ascii"; name="hammer.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="hammer.diff" Index: lib/csu/amd64/crti.S =========================================================================== --- lib/csu/amd64/crti.S 2004/03/20 12:10:39 #1 +++ lib/csu/amd64/crti.S 2004/03/20 12:10:39 @@ -28,12 +28,14 @@ .globl _init .type _init,@function _init: + subq $8,%rsp .section .fini,"ax",@progbits .align 4 .globl _fini .type _fini,@function _fini: + subq $8,%rsp .section .rodata .ascii "$FreeBSD: src/lib/csu/amd64/crti.S,v 1.6 2002/05/15 04:19:49 obrien Exp $\0" Index: lib/csu/amd64/crtn.S =========================================================================== --- lib/csu/amd64/crtn.S 2004/03/20 12:10:39 #1 +++ lib/csu/amd64/crtn.S 2004/03/20 12:10:39 @@ -24,9 +24,11 @@ */ .section .init,"ax",@progbits + addq $8,%rsp ret .section .fini,"ax",@progbits + addq $8,%rsp ret .section .rodata Index: libexec/rtld-elf/amd64/rtld_start.S =========================================================================== --- libexec/rtld-elf/amd64/rtld_start.S 2004/03/20 12:10:39 #2 +++ libexec/rtld-elf/amd64/rtld_start.S 2004/03/20 12:10:39 @@ -31,14 +31,13 @@ .type .rtld_start,@function .rtld_start: xorq %rbp,%rbp # Clear frame pointer for good form - subq $16,%rsp # A place to store exit procedure addr + subq $24,%rsp # A place to store exit procedure addr movq %rdi,%r12 movq %rsp,%rsi # save address of exit proc movq %rsp,%rdx # construct address of obj_main addq $8,%rdx call _rtld@PLT # Call rtld(sp); returns entry point popq %rsi # Get exit procedure address - addq $8,%rsp # Ignore obj_main movq %r12,%rdi # *ap /* * At this point, %rax contains the entry point of the main program, and @@ -62,8 +61,9 @@ * assembly-language code that is not ABI-compliant. * * Stack map: - * reloff 0x58 - * obj 0x50 + * reloff 0x60 + * obj 0x58 + * spare 0x50 * rflags 0x48 * rax 0x40 * rdx 0x38 @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ .globl _rtld_bind_start .type _rtld_bind_start,@function _rtld_bind_start: + subq $8,%rsp pushfq # Save rflags pushq %rax # Save %rax pushq %rdx # Save %rdx @@ -90,15 +91,15 @@ pushq %r10 # Save %r10 pushq %r11 # Save %r11 - movq 0x50(%rsp),%rdi # Fetch obj argument - movq 0x58(%rsp),%rsi # Fetch reloff argument + movq 0x58(%rsp),%rdi # Fetch obj argument + movq 0x60(%rsp),%rsi # Fetch reloff argument leaq (%rsi,%rsi,2),%rsi # multiply by 3 leaq (,%rsi,8),%rsi # now 8, for 24 (sizeof Elf_Rela) call _rtld_bind@PLT # Transfer control to the binder /* Now %rax contains the entry point of the function being called. */ - movq %rax,0x58(%rsp) # Store target over reloff argument + movq %rax,0x60(%rsp) # Store target over reloff argument popq %r11 # Restore %r11 popq %r10 # Restore %r10 popq %r9 # Restore %r9 @@ -109,5 +110,5 @@ popq %rdx # Restore %rdx popq %rax # Restore %rax popfq # Restore rflags - leaq 8(%rsp),%rsp # Discard obj, do not change rflags + leaq 16(%rsp),%rsp # Discard spare, obj, do not change rflags ret # "Return" to target address --Boundary-00=_UeKXAY7r8NP41z7-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 20 19:38:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AE816A4CF for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:38:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FCB43D2D for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:38:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638212A7EA for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:38:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB48E259 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:38:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2L3bSf5073239 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:37:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2L3bRkI073238 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:37:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:37:27 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200403201220.36148.peter@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200403201220.36148.peter@wemm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403201937.27681.peter@wemm.org> Subject: Re: Heads up.. bug fix in the pipeline... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 03:38:15 -0000 On Saturday 20 March 2004 12:20 pm, Peter Wemm wrote: > The good news is that the fixes are small. The bad news is that > crti/crtn.o are linked into *every single shared library!*. Any > libraries that contain C++ code and use static constructors will need > to be recompiled after ld-elf.so.1 is fixed (since one of the > double-wrongs in 2) wll be corrected, leaving a single wrong). > > So. that means that the fix will make some things magically start > working after a 'make world'. And it might break a few things from > ports. A recompile (portupgrade -f) should fix it. FWIW, the changes have been committed. I'd really like to know what happens to the ogg123 breakage after a world rebuild and a rebuild of the port and those it depends on. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5