Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:47:36 +0100 From: Laurent LEVIER <llevier@argosnet.com> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.2.20040215094221.01f410b0@213.30.158.180> In-Reply-To: <200402150027.i1F0Rkqe016839@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: <200402150027.i1F0Rkqe016839@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy, Kris, >The deed has been done. That was simple. :) If that is what you feel. I am still a bit puzzle. Do I need to take action on my side? If so, is this action is to change the value of NO_LATEST_LINK in the makefile? Notice also I sent 2 weeks ago the built for Hydra 2.6 (the last version) and it seems CVSup does not reflect this change yet. So I cant do a diff of a makefile that is not the one that should be in the ports/ tree. Kris, are you able to determine the status of my 2.6 update? Here was my answer to Jonathan: >Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:36:29 +0100 >To: Jonathan Weiss <tomonage1@gmx.de>, <Yonatan@xpert.com> >From: Laurent LEVIER <llevier@argosnet.com> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: hydra-2.2 >Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org> > >Jonathan, > >Port 2.6 for Hydra on FreeBSD 4.x now done. See .tar.gz attached file. > >Brgrds Thanks Brgrds Laurent LEVIER Systems & Networks Security Expert, CISSP CISM
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.1.1.2.20040215094221.01f410b0>