From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 22 10:15:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0781B16A4CE; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:15:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3b.sentex.ca (smtp3b.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A179543D31; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:15:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.9]) by smtp3b.sentex.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7MAF8el039989; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:15:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7MAF74W093066; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:15:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 87FD97303F; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:15:07 -0400 (EDT) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040822101507.87FD97303F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:15:07 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:15:09 -0000 TB --- 2004-08-22 09:24:11 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-08-22 09:24:11 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2004-08-22 09:24:11 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-08-22 09:24:11 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2004-08-22 09:24:11 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-08-22 09:29:57 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2004-08-22 09:29:57 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src TB --- 2004-08-22 09:29:57 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/obj/sparc64/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdb/../../gdb/libgdb/libgdb.a(fbsd-threads.o)(.text+0x28b4): In function `ps_lgetregs': : undefined reference to `fill_gregset' /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/obj/sparc64/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdb/../../gdb/libgdb/libgdb.a(fbsd-threads.o)(.text+0x2940): In function `ps_lsetregs': : undefined reference to `supply_gregset' /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/obj/sparc64/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdb/../../gdb/libgdb/libgdb.a(fbsd-threads.o)(.text+0x29f4): In function `ps_lgetfpregs': : undefined reference to `fill_fpregset' /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/obj/sparc64/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdb/../../gdb/libgdb/libgdb.a(fbsd-threads.o)(.text+0x2a80): In function `ps_lsetfpregs': : undefined reference to `supply_fpregset' *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdb. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/gnu/usr.bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/gnu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src. TB --- 2004-08-22 10:15:07 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-08-22 10:15:07 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2004-08-22 10:15:07 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 23 05:06:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1AF16A4CE for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 05:06:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F443D1D for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 05:06:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7N56LTH017395 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 01:06:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i7N56LUW017394 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 01:06:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 01:06:21 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040823050621.GH15251@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Removed snapshot... X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 05:06:22 -0000 I removed the snapshot iso that was on the FTP sites. At this point you're better off with the 5.3-BETA1 stuff. :-) -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 23 11:02:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3025716A4E5 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:02:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2657243D31 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:02:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7NB272l029879 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:02:07 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7NB26ph029873 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:02:06 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:02:06 GMT Message-Id: <200408231102.i7NB26ph029873@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:02:07 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/12/16] sparc64/60300sparc64 Constant kernel messages: calcru: negativ o [2004/02/21] sparc64/63161sparc64 system panics when writing to an NFS moun 2 problems total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/06/24] sparc64/53670sparc64 pthreads implementation on 5.1-Release sp o [2004/01/29] sparc64/62053sparc64 Using bridging on 5.2 Sparc64 causes imme 2 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- a [2003/10/11] sparc64/57856sparc64 sparc64: IDE Raid controller no detect di o [2004/05/06] sparc64/66314sparc64 SMP kernel panic: ipi_send: couldn't send o [2004/07/09] sparc64/68869sparc64 netcard: Unexpect packet size, drop packe o [2004/08/02] sparc64/69893sparc64 asr panics the system on sparc64 4 problems total. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 23 20:25:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDC216A4CE for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:25:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F1E43D5F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:25:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jogorman@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 73so33496rnk for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.76 with SMTP id y76mr1166733rna; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.81.44 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:25:52 -0500 From: Jim O'Gorman To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Gigabit Ethernet X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jim O'Gorman List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:25:59 -0000 I am having some problems finding a gigabit ethernet card for FreeBSD Sparc64 that I know will work. On the page: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2.1R/hardware-sparc64.html#ETHERNET I see the listed ethernet cards, yet I have found some release notes at: http://cpan.cybercomm.nl/pub/freebsd/releases/sparc64/5.2-RELEASE/RELNOTES.TXT that list some drivers (such as the sk) that don't show up on both lists. So I am a bit confused on what will work and what will not. If I am correct, this card would work: http://www.netgear.com/products/details/GA302T.php using the bge driver? Any PCI gigabit cards that people have had good luck with in the past? Thanks Jim From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 00:08:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C2716A4CE for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:08:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sirius.firepipe.net (sirius.firepipe.net [69.13.116.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1552443D53 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:08:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by sirius.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B36A51816C; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:08:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:08:15 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Jim O'Gorman Message-ID: <20040824000815.GR90227@sirius.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: Jim O'Gorman , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8m/hfNLtAhX2NvnO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gigabit Ethernet X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:08:16 -0000 --8m/hfNLtAhX2NvnO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 03:25:52PM -0500, Jim O'Gorman wrote: > I am having some problems finding a gigabit ethernet card for FreeBSD > Sparc64 that I know will work. >=20 > On the page: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2.1R/hardware-sparc64.html= #ETHERNET > I see the listed ethernet cards, yet I have found some release notes > at: http://cpan.cybercomm.nl/pub/freebsd/releases/sparc64/5.2-RELEASE/REL= NOTES.TXT > that list some drivers (such as the sk) that don't show up on both > lists. So I am a bit confused on what will work and what will not. >=20 > If I am correct, this card would work: > http://www.netgear.com/products/details/GA302T.php using the bge > driver? >=20 > Any PCI gigabit cards that people have had good luck with in the past? Hi, I tested sk(4), nge(4), ti(4), and lge(4) cards on my sparc64 box. Unfortunately, they all need work before they'll work on sparc64. However, bge(4) should work as wpaul@ converted it to use the busdma(9) portable kernel bus memory mapping API. I have not personally tried putting my bge card into the sparc, though. The GA302T is listed as supported in the bge(4) man page so my guess is it would work with that. Regards, --=20 wca --8m/hfNLtAhX2NvnO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBKobvF47idPgWcsURAoORAJ49uSubEuDNX9Ys/xkZBmX0hpHJmACeJsGd TJEBDU5pFD991MsKbg4Il0I= =C7So -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8m/hfNLtAhX2NvnO-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 00:33:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C5416A4CE for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:33:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mercury.qix.co.uk (mercury.qix.co.uk [212.42.1.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B8C43D41 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:33:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aledm@qix.co.uk) Received: from localhost (aledm@localhost) by mercury.qix.co.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7O0XKhj019383; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:33:20 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:33:20 +0100 (BST) From: Aled Morris To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, "Jim O'Gorman" , Will Andrews In-Reply-To: <20040824000815.GR90227@sirius.firepipe.net> Message-ID: References: <20040824000815.GR90227@sirius.firepipe.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Gigabit Ethernet X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:33:27 -0000 On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Will Andrews wrote: >I tested sk(4), nge(4), ti(4), and lge(4) cards on my sparc64 >box. Unfortunately, they all need work before they'll work on >sparc64. However, bge(4) should work as wpaul@ converted it to >use the busdma(9) portable kernel bus memory mapping API. I have >not personally tried putting my bge card into the sparc, though. > >The GA302T is listed as supported in the bge(4) man page so my >guess is it would work with that. I don't track this stuff but I happen to have a GA302T and an Ultra 5 so I put the two together: # uname -a FreeBSD SNAP-20040727 FreeBSD SNAP-20040727 #0: Sun Aug 1 04:30:37 UTC 2004 root@bobbi.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC sparc64 # kldload if_bge bge0: mem 0x10000-0x1ffff at d evice 1.0 on pci2 bge0: firmware handshake timed out bge0: PHY read timed out bge0: MII without any PHY! panic: trap: memory address not aligned cpuid = 0; KDB: enter: panic [thread 100033] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x38: ta %xcc, 1 db> I'm happy to try any other code if it would help. Aled From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 01:02:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F369816A4CE for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:02:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CE743D6B for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:02:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jogorman@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 75so41017rnl for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.102.54 with SMTP id z54mr991204rnb; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.81.44 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:02:37 -0500 From: Jim O'Gorman To: Aled Morris In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gigabit Ethernet X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jim O'Gorman List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:02:44 -0000 Thanks for trying that, I was going to order that card tomorrow morning. You just saved me money! Thanks Jim On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:33:20 +0100 (BST), Aled Morris wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Will Andrews wrote: > > >I tested sk(4), nge(4), ti(4), and lge(4) cards on my sparc64 > >box. Unfortunately, they all need work before they'll work on > >sparc64. However, bge(4) should work as wpaul@ converted it to > >use the busdma(9) portable kernel bus memory mapping API. I have > >not personally tried putting my bge card into the sparc, though. > > > >The GA302T is listed as supported in the bge(4) man page so my > >guess is it would work with that. > > > I don't track this stuff but I happen to have a GA302T and an Ultra 5 so I > put the two together: > > # uname -a > FreeBSD SNAP-20040727 FreeBSD SNAP-20040727 #0: Sun Aug 1 04:30:37 UTC 2004 > root@bobbi.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC sparc64 > # kldload if_bge > bge0: mem > 0x10000-0x1ffff at d > evice 1.0 on pci2 > bge0: firmware handshake timed out > bge0: PHY read timed out > bge0: MII without any PHY! > panic: trap: memory address not aligned > cpuid = 0; > KDB: enter: panic > [thread 100033] > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x38: ta %xcc, 1 > db> > > I'm happy to try any other code if it would help. > > Aled > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 26 06:25:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F252116A4CE for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:25:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.kt-is.co.kr (ns.kt-is.co.kr [211.218.149.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2802543D64 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:25:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yongari@kt-is.co.kr) Received: from michelle.kt-is.co.kr (ns2.kt-is.co.kr [220.76.118.193]) (authenticated bits=128) by ns.kt-is.co.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7Q6M8Ah090018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:22:08 +0900 (KST) Received: from michelle.kt-is.co.kr (localhost.kt-is.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.kt-is.co.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7Q6PNcD012446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:25:23 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from yongari@kt-is.co.kr) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.kt-is.co.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i7Q6PNlA012445 for sparc64@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:25:23 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from yongari@kt-is.co.kr) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:25:23 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040826062523.GB12164@kt-is.co.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (ns.kt-is.co.kr) Subject: Revised cs4231 sound driver for Ultrasparcs X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: yongari@kt-is.co.kr List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:25:55 -0000 Hello All, Here is a revised sound driver for SBus/EBus based Ultrasparcs. Changes from my old SBus sound driver: 1. Added support s4231 audio chip found on EBus based Ultrasparcs. 2. Added AFMT_S16_BE audio format. So there is no need to be invoked endian conversion routine in sound(4)(feeder_endian). Most PC based soundcards supports little-endian format only (AFMT_S16_LE). If these cards are used on sparc64, sound(4) would have to perform endian-conversion in kernel. Of course, this reduces playback/capture performance. 3. bug fix for mixer settings 4. bug fix for skipping audio samples on APC DMA Audio application notes: Well written audio applications, endian-clean and LP64 ready applications, should work without any problems. For instance, mpg123, mp3blaster, mplayer works well. xmms, one of most popular player, needs additional patch from here. http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~yongari/patch-OSS.sparc64 Due to lack of X supports on my sparc64, audio playback on xmms was tested on a remote i386 X server. Known bugs & limitations: Audio capture(recording) was not tested at all. Full-duplex operation may not work. The driver was tested on Ultra2 and AXe. Installation: 1. get the driver file and patch your source tree #fetch http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~yongari/cs4231.freebsd.diff #cd /usr/src #patch -p0 < /path/to/patch-file 2. build kernel and kernel modules #cd /usr/src #make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_CONFIG #make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_CONFIG If you don't want to use the sound driver as a kernel module, you can add the following lines in your kernel configuration. device sound device "snd_cs4231" 3. reboot 4. load snd_cs4231.ko driver module and play Note, you may want to mute speaker output with mixer(8) on Ultra1/2. * You may notice all sound drivers are installed by my patch. But I don't know whether these drivers are functional or not on sparc64. It wouldn't surprise me if none of the drivers except snd_cs4231 work on sparc64. Since I have a trident 4dwave PCI card, I can help to make it work on sparc64 provided that I have more time and requests from users. The patch is for 6-CURRENT and is available at: http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~yongari/cs4231.freebsd.diff (The patch may be applied to 5.3BETA or higher as well.) If you are interested in audio support on sparc64, please give it a try and let me know how it goes. Thanks. Regards, Pyun YongHyeon -- Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 08:11:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FF416A4CE for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:11:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postoffice.e-easy.com.au (eth0.lnk.aims.net.au [203.31.73.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EE043D5E for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@e-easy.com.au) Received: from e-easy.com.au (eet03s01.corp.e-easy.com.au [192.168.10.3] (may be forged)) by postoffice.e-easy.com.au with ESMTP id i7R8BB4B048745 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:11:12 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from chris@e-easy.com.au) Message-Id: <200408270811.i7R8BB4B048745@postoffice.e-easy.com.au> Received: from eet03s01 by e-easy.com.au (MDaemon.PRO.v7.1.2.R) with ESMTP id md50000239648.msg for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:03:03 +1000 From: "Chris Knight" To: "'Scott Long'" Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:03:02 +1000 Organization: E-Easy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.181 In-Reply-To: <41238FB0.9000909@samsco.org> Thread-Index: AcSFR/TVxL42XpFURhihKmmtQgWUMwGw8sEw X-Spam-Processed: e-easy.com.au, Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:03:03 +1000 (not processed: spam filter disabled) X-Return-Path: chris@e-easy.com.au X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: sparc64@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: HEADS UP [Re: Insta-panic with recent -current on Ultra10] X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@e-easy.com.au List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:11:29 -0000 Howdy, I'm still getting this panic on sources updated just before you tagged newvers.sh for BETA2. ad0: 8693MB [17662/16/63] at ata2-master WDMA2 ATAPI_RESET time = 100us acd0: CDRW at ata3-master PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0a IOMMU fault virtual address 0xc0620000 panic: pcib: uncorrectable DMA error AFAR 0xf9a5880 AFSR 0x270000ff00000000 KDB: stack backtrace: psycho_ue() at psycho_ue+0x70 intr_fast() at intr_fast+0x88 -- interrupt level=0xd pil=0 %o7=0xc01d4b28 -- vm_page_zero_check() at vm_page_zero_check+0xb4 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x9c fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 KDB: enter: panic [thread 100040] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3c: ta %xcc, 1 db> My ddb skills are, well, crap. Any pointers to help debugging this would be helpful. Regards, Chris Knight Systems Administrator E-Easy Tel: +61 3 6334 9995 Fax: +61 3 6331 7032 Mob: +61 419 528 795 Web: http://www.e-easy.com.au > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Long [mailto:scottl@samsco.org] > Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2004 3:20 AM > To: Ken Smith > Cc: Gavin Atkinson; Chris Knight; sparc64@freebsd.org > Subject: HEADS UP [Re: Insta-panic with recent -current on Ultra10] > > All, > > This is likely my fault, not Soeren's. I'm going to try to > fix it the right way before BETA1 rather than ask Soeren to > re-add the ugly fix-up code. > > Scott From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 10:01:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CDB16A4CE; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:01:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3b.sentex.ca (smtp3b.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F69043D2D; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:01:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by smtp3b.sentex.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7RA1F7F067888; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 06:01:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7RA1F5Z016048; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 06:01:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 8A82B7303F; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 06:01:15 -0400 (EDT) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040827100115.8A82B7303F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 06:01:15 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:01:18 -0000 TB --- 2004-08-27 08:56:59 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-08-27 08:56:59 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2004-08-27 08:56:59 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-08-27 08:56:59 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2004-08-27 08:56:59 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-08-27 09:01:50 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2004-08-27 09:01:50 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src TB --- 2004-08-27 09:01:50 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] cc -O2 -pipe -DKEYSERV_RANDOM -DBROKEN_DES -I. -o keyserv keyserv.o setkey.o crypt_svc.o crypt_server.o -lmp -lcrypto -lrpcsvc gzip -cn /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/usr.sbin/keyserv/keyserv.8 > keyserv.8.gz ===> usr.sbin/kldxref cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/usr.sbin/kldxref/kldxref.c cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/usr.sbin/kldxref/ef.c cc -O2 -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/usr.sbin/kldxref/ef_obj.c /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/usr.sbin/kldxref/ef_obj.c: In function `ef_obj_open': /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/usr.sbin/kldxref/ef_obj.c:377: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/usr.sbin/kldxref. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src/usr.sbin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64/src. TB --- 2004-08-27 10:01:15 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-08-27 10:01:15 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2004-08-27 10:01:15 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 10:16:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BD016A4CE for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:16:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.kt-is.co.kr (ns.kt-is.co.kr [211.218.149.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BCE43D45 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:16:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yongari@kt-is.co.kr) Received: from michelle.kt-is.co.kr (ns2.kt-is.co.kr [220.76.118.193]) (authenticated bits=128) by ns.kt-is.co.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7RACSAh033843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:12:28 +0900 (KST) Received: from michelle.kt-is.co.kr (localhost.kt-is.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.kt-is.co.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7RAFpcD016635 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:15:52 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from yongari@kt-is.co.kr) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.kt-is.co.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i7RAFpKf016634; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:15:51 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from yongari@kt-is.co.kr) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:15:51 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Chris Knight Message-ID: <20040827101551.GA16220@kt-is.co.kr> References: <41238FB0.9000909@samsco.org> <200408270811.i7R8BB4B048745@postoffice.e-easy.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408270811.i7R8BB4B048745@postoffice.e-easy.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (ns.kt-is.co.kr) cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP [Re: Insta-panic with recent -current on Ultra10] X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: yongari@kt-is.co.kr List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:16:53 -0000 On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 06:03:02PM +1000, Chris Knight wrote: > Howdy, > > I'm still getting this panic on sources updated just before > you tagged newvers.sh for BETA2. > > ad0: 8693MB [17662/16/63] at ata2-master WDMA2 ^^^^^ Since you still use DMA on ad device, I'm afraid your kernel is not updated with latest loader. (src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader/main.c, rev 1.24 or 1.23.2.1) Please re-cvsup and try again. > ATAPI_RESET time = 100us > acd0: CDRW at ata3-master PIO4 > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0a > IOMMU fault virtual address 0xc0620000 > panic: pcib: uncorrectable DMA error AFAR 0xf9a5880 AFSR 0x270000ff00000000 > KDB: stack backtrace: > psycho_ue() at psycho_ue+0x70 > intr_fast() at intr_fast+0x88 > -- interrupt level=0xd pil=0 %o7=0xc01d4b28 -- > vm_page_zero_check() at vm_page_zero_check+0xb4 > fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x9c > fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 > KDB: enter: panic > [thread 100040] > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3c: ta %xcc, 1 > db> > Regards, Pyun YongHyeon -- Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 12:20:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD0216A4CF for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:20:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [222.146.51.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D61543D1F for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:20:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p25049-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [219.161.86.49]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F4225BF for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:20:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7RCJUA2081763 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:19:30 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:18:43 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040827.211843.08645408.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org From: Hiroki Sato X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.66 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_27_21_18_43_2004_765)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 64bit time_t problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:20:03 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_27_21_18_43_2004_765)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I noticed that after the system clock set too far in the future, ntpdate could not reset it properly. I tried the following (on 5.3-BETA1): # date 207008270000 ; ntpdate 192.168.100.1 ; date Wed Aug 27 00:00:00 JST 2070 Looking for host 192.168.100.1 and service ntp host found : xxx.allbsd.org 27 Aug 21:00:13 ntpdate[552]: step time server 192.168.100.1 offset -;0446744071497267106.746178 sec Fri Aug 27 21:00:13 JST 2004 # date 210008270000 ; ntpdate 192.168.100.1 ; date Fri Aug 27 00:00:00 JST 2100 Looking for host 192.168.100.1 and service ntp host found : xxx.allbsd.org 4 Oct 03:26:57 ntpdate[521]: step time server 192.168.100.1 offset 1265599617.382757 sec Tue Oct 4 03:26:57 JST 2140 # date 227008270000 ; ntpdate 192.168.100.1 ; date Password: Sat Aug 27 00:00:00 JST 2270 Looking for host 192.168.100.1 and service ntp host found : xxx.allbsd.org 10 Nov 09:57:37 ntpdate[564]: step time server 192.168.100.1 offset 195904656.965267 sec Fri Nov 10 09:57:37 JST 2276 The time set by ntpdate has a period of about 136 years depending on the previous time. I think this is problematic because the system clock can go wrong when the box is left in a power-off state, for example. Probably the time is handled in 32-bit somewhere, but I am not sure where it is. Is this a known problem or is there some workaround? -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_27_21_18_43_2004_765)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBLyajTyzT2CeTzy0RAtZ0AJ9y1T3B3pDq3U9QVlCX9TtuXnoskACgjagr moNuiBmMFgF8slTASTqaIaQ= =XNeS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_27_21_18_43_2004_765)---- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 12:47:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C6316A4CE; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:47:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from the-macgregors.org (82-33-59-105.cable.ubr06.stav.blueyonder.co.uk [82.33.59.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94C343D45; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:47:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.macgregor@blueyonder.co.uk) X-Urban-Legend: Mail headers contain urban legends Received: from fire (rob@fire.macgregor [192.168.32.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by the-macgregors.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7RClGku009570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:47:16 GMT Message-Id: <200408271247.i7RClGku009570@the-macgregors.org> From: "Rob MacGregor" To: "'Hiroki Sato'" , Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:47:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <20040827.211843.08645408.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> Thread-Index: AcSMMElXBNfgA0EqTxi1vOlezK9FEQAA2DUw X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: RE: 64bit time_t problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:47:20 -0000 On Friday, August 27, 2004 1:19 PM, Hiroki Sato <> unleashed the infinite monkeys and produced: > The time set by ntpdate has a period of about 136 years depending on > the previous time. > > I think this is problematic because the system clock can go wrong > when the box is left in a power-off state, for example. Probably > the time is handled in 32-bit somewhere, but I am not sure where it is. > > Is this a known problem or is there some workaround? AFAIK it's an NTP "issue" - your system is required to be within a number of years of "now" for it to be set. Trawl comp.protocols.time.ntp for details, or see the NTP documentation on the NTP website (www.ntp.org) where I remember this being discussed in the last few months (sorry I can't be more precise). -- Rob | Oh my God! They killed init! You bastards! From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 13:01:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F378E16A4CE for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:01:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E1F43D53 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:01:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7RD1UTH017837; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:01:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i7RD1TDI017836; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:01:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:01:29 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: Pyun YongHyeon Message-ID: <20040827130129.GB17409@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <41238FB0.9000909@samsco.org> <200408270811.i7R8BB4B048745@postoffice.e-easy.com.au> <20040827101551.GA16220@kt-is.co.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040827101551.GA16220@kt-is.co.kr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Chris Knight cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP [Re: Insta-panic with recent -current on Ultra10] X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:01:41 -0000 On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 07:15:51PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 06:03:02PM +1000, Chris Knight wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > I'm still getting this panic on sources updated just before > > you tagged newvers.sh for BETA2. > > > > ad0: 8693MB [17662/16/63] at ata2-master WDMA2 > ^^^^^ > Since you still use DMA on ad device, I'm afraid your kernel is not > updated with latest loader. > (src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader/main.c, rev 1.24 or 1.23.2.1) > Please re-cvsup and try again. > This is most likely the problem but it might not be a re-cvsup problem. If you are following The Right Way To Update (which virtually none of us do... :-) then you're installing the new kernel and rebooting before running installworld. It's installworld that takes care of installing the new loader, which has hardcoded in it something that turns off ata DMA. You can get around this by stopping the loader before it boots the kernel (where it's typically counting down from 10), and do this: set hw.ata.ata_dma=0 boot That will let the new kernel boot. And then you can go ahead with the installworld. The current version of the loader will be installed then, and this step shouldn't be necessary any more. Scott was able to locate the problem that makes this necessary yesterday. It turned out to be something in the new ATA code after all and not what he had originally thought. He sent the report of what's happening to Soeren, but it definitely won't be fixed by BETA2 which is building now... -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 14:09:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2029116A4CE; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:09:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008AB43D6E; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (arved@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7RE9TxS069981; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:09:29 GMT (envelope-from arved@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from arved@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7RE9Tic069977; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:09:29 GMT (envelope-from arved) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:09:29 GMT From: Tilman Linneweh Message-Id: <200408271409.i7RE9Tic069977@freefall.freebsd.org> To: arved@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/50943: kernel panic to initialize NIC (Intel Pro/100 or 3COM905B X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:09:30 -0000 Synopsis: kernel panic to initialize NIC (Intel Pro/100 or 3COM905B Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-sparc64 Responsible-Changed-By: arved Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Aug 27 14:07:10 GMT 2004 Responsible-Changed-Why: Maybe this is a sparc64 specific problem. Does the em(4) driver even work on sparc64? Over to Mailinglist for feedback. If you are sure this is not a sparc64 specific issue please reassign the PR to em(4) driver maintainer. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=50943 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 04:24:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3F016A4D0 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 04:24:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postoffice.e-easy.com.au (eth0.lnk.aims.net.au [203.31.73.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F65A43D55 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 04:24:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@e-easy.com.au) Received: from e-easy.com.au (eet03s01.corp.e-easy.com.au [192.168.10.3] (may be forged)) by postoffice.e-easy.com.au with ESMTP id i7S4OHZl021713 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:24:17 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from chris@e-easy.com.au) Message-Id: <200408280424.i7S4OHZl021713@postoffice.e-easy.com.au> Received: from eet03s01 by e-easy.com.au (MDaemon.PRO.v7.1.2.R) with ESMTP id md50000240328.msg for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:53:57 +1000 From: "Chris Knight" To: "'Ken Smith'" Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:53:54 +1000 Organization: E-Easy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.181 In-Reply-To: <20040827130129.GB17409@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Thread-Index: AcSMNghim1D0c7XvR429Hu4NwEJOQgAe85fg X-Spam-Processed: e-easy.com.au, Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:53:57 +1000 (not processed: spam filter disabled) X-Return-Path: chris@e-easy.com.au X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: sparc64@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: HEADS UP [Re: Insta-panic with recent -current on Ultra10] X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@e-easy.com.au List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 04:24:24 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org On Behalf Of Ken Smith > Sent: Friday, 27 August 2004 11:01 PM > To: Pyun YongHyeon > Cc: Chris Knight; sparc64@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: HEADS UP [Re: Insta-panic with recent -current > on Ultra10] > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 07:15:51PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 06:03:02PM +1000, Chris Knight wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > > > I'm still getting this panic on sources updated just before > > > you tagged newvers.sh for BETA2. > > > > > > ad0: 8693MB [17662/16/63] at ata2-master WDMA2 > > ^^^^^ > > Since you still use DMA on ad device, I'm afraid your kernel is not > > updated with latest loader. > > (src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader/main.c, rev 1.24 or 1.23.2.1) > > Please re-cvsup and try again. > > > > This is most likely the problem but it might not be a re-cvsup > problem. > If you are following The Right Way To Update (which virtually none of > us do... :-) then you're installing the new kernel and rebooting > before running installworld. It's installworld that takes care of > installing the new loader, which has hardcoded in it something that > turns off ata DMA. > Yeah, I remember seeing the commit for this. Simply forgot to engage brain and either install the loader prior to rebooting on the new kernel, or turning DMA off. > You can get around this by stopping the loader before it boots the > kernel (where it's typically counting down from 10), and do this: > > set hw.ata.ata_dma=0 > boot > > That will let the new kernel boot. And then you can go ahead with the > installworld. The current version of the loader will be installed > then, and this step shouldn't be necessary any more. > This did the trick. Had I bothered to think things through, I would have come to this conclusion. That's what I get for trying to wrap things up early on a Friday :-) > Scott was able to locate the problem that makes this necessary > yesterday. > It turned out to be something in the new ATA code after all and not > what he had originally thought. He sent the report of what's > happening to Soeren, but it definitely won't be fixed by BETA2 which > is building now... > Cool. Thanks for the explanation. Regards, Chris Knight Systems Administrator E-Easy Tel: +61 3 6334 9995 Fax: +61 3 6331 7032 Mob: +61 419 528 795 Web: http://www.e-easy.com.au From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 15:38:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634A316A4CE for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:38:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from malik.acsalaska.net (malik.acsalaska.net [209.112.155.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C5D43D5E for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:38:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from royce@alaska.net) Received: from [10.0.10.65] ([10.0.10.65]) by malik.acsalaska.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7SFcPkn027337 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:38:26 -0800 (AKDT) (envelope-from royce@alaska.net) Message-ID: <4130A6F1.7080202@alaska.net> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:38:25 -0800 From: Royce Williams User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACS-Spam-Status: no X-ACS-Scanned-By: MD 2.44; SA 2.64; spamdefang 1.108 Subject: getting OBP version; also, FAQ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:38:27 -0000 How does one cough up the OBP version information while booted into freebsd/sparc64? I don't see it in the dmesg output or sysctl information, and didn't find anything in the ht://Dig Mailman archives for the list. The only third-party product that I could find was the not-exactly-free product Sysinfo (http://www.magnicomp.com/sysinfo/sysinfo.shtml), which isn't compiled for FreeBSD/sparc64 and provides no source to build it myself. Also -- in preparation to ask this question, I went hunting for a FAQ. Did I just miss it, or are there few questions that are frequently asked? :) -royce -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Royce D. Williams IP Engineering, ACS personal: [first]@alaska.net PGP: 3FC087DB/1776A531 work: [first.last]@acsalaska.net http://www.tycho.org/royce/ From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 18:28:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB9C16A4CE for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:28:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAAC43D45 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:28:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7SIS21a026792; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:28:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i7SIRvo8026791; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:27:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:27:57 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Royce Williams Message-ID: <20040828202757.A26644@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <4130A6F1.7080202@alaska.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <4130A6F1.7080202@alaska.net>; from royce@alaska.net on Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 07:38:25AM -0800 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.27.0.6; VDF 6.27.0.37 (host: newtrinity.zeist.de) cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getting OBP version; also, FAQ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:28:12 -0000 On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 07:38:25AM -0800, Royce Williams wrote: > How does one cough up the OBP version information while booted into > freebsd/sparc64? > > I don't see it in the dmesg output or sysctl information, and didn't > find anything in the ht://Dig Mailman archives for the list. The only > third-party product that I could find was the not-exactly-free product > Sysinfo (http://www.magnicomp.com/sysinfo/sysinfo.shtml), which isn't > compiled for FreeBSD/sparc64 and provides no source to build it myself. > ofwdump -P version /openprom should do > Also -- in preparation to ask this question, I went hunting for a FAQ. > Did I just miss it, or are there few questions that are frequently > asked? :) > Hrm, there are not many freqeuntly asked questions regarding FreeBSD on sparc64 although a FAQ wouldn't be that bad. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 20:48:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847ED16A4CE for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:48:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [222.146.51.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E3F43D4C for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:48:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p25049-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [219.161.86.49]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E358C2688; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 05:48:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7SKfcA2092906; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 05:41:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 05:41:11 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040829.054111.102114690.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: freebsd.macgregor@blueyonder.co.uk From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <200408271247.i7RClGku009570@the-macgregors.org> References: <20040827.211843.08645408.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <200408271247.i7RClGku009570@the-macgregors.org> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.66 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug_29_05_41_12_2004_504)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 64bit time_t problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:48:41 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug_29_05_41_12_2004_504)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Rob MacGregor" wrote in <200408271247.i7RClGku009570@the-macgregors.org>: m> AFAIK it's an NTP "issue" - your system is required to be within a number of m> years of "now" for it to be set. Trawl comp.protocols.time.ntp for details, or m> see the NTP documentation on the NTP website (www.ntp.org) where I remember this m> being discussed in the last few months (sorry I can't be more precise). Thanks for the pointer. I will look into them. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug_29_05_41_12_2004_504)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBMO3oTyzT2CeTzy0RAoy0AJ9+kXKoxcmmvjHYYoT1UAqChrV+kgCfWTIo uUvFt10iD8lKl1ayllTAtFs= =Y1AI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug_29_05_41_12_2004_504)---- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 21:18:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0465116A4CE for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:18:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [222.146.51.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B752043D55 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:18:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p25049-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [219.161.86.49]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BF419BA for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 06:18:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7SKvLA2092961 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 05:57:21 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 05:57:15 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040829.055715.02308074.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org From: Hiroki Sato X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.66 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug_29_05_57_15_2004_023)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: U1E and U2 are supported system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:18:40 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug_29_05_57_15_2004_023)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I think FreeBSD now supports SCSI controller on Ultra 1E and Ultra2 since esp(4) is recently added, but is it reasonable to update the following part in the hardware notes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.2 Partially Supported Systems The following systems are partially supported by FreeBSD. In particular the onboard scsi controller in sbus systems is not supported. * Enterprise 3500 * Enterprise 4500 * Ultra 1 Enterprise (1E for short) * Ultra 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- If so, I would like to move U1E and U2E to the "Fully Supported Systems" section. I do not know about E3500 and E4500, but they use a different controller chip? -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug_29_05_57_15_2004_023)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBMPGrTyzT2CeTzy0RAl0lAKDSIbRpDc/LSVSeZVX19JvzyMb88QCglpap UutikRYTtv3QayIGhPEUQ6M= =SKlg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Aug_29_05_57_15_2004_023)---- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 21:57:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630DA16A4CE for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:57:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beagle2.mehnert.org (beagle2.mehnert.org [212.42.235.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EDA43D2F for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:57:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hannes@mehnert.org) Received: by beagle2.mehnert.org (Postfix, from userid 127) id 4404E95888; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (port-212-202-201-74.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.201.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Hannes Mehnert", Issuer "mehnert root CA" (verified OK)) by beagle2.mehnert.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847AE95860 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:57:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:58:02 +0200 From: Hannes Mehnert To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040828215802.GD1844@mehnert.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on beagle2.mehnert.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Level: Subject: break and freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:57:41 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a sun enterprise 450 which runs FreeBSD/sparc64 5.2-CURRENT from Mon, Jul 26. I want to be able to reboot via break on serial console, but it looks like FreeBSD blocks this. Are there patches/configure options I missed? Best Regards, Hannes Mehnert GPG-Fingerprint: B3BB E539 F6BF 6942 1492 3ACF 45CB 8D97 3881 8D1C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBMP/hRcuNlziBjRwRAjrrAJ0bVb39/6F7SquyBUbiZenwu6PRkwCgsDo7 JLjsZs54alJhb/tGnkvxs48= =9K7D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 22:48:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3F616A4CF; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:48:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vhost109.his.com (vhost109.his.com [216.194.225.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12C643D1D; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:48:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brad@stop.mail-abuse.org) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (localhost.his.com [127.0.0.1]) by vhost109.his.com (8.12.11/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i7SMmM2q032515; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:48:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from brad@stop.mail-abuse.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: bs663385@127.0.0.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040829.054111.102114690.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> References: <20040827.211843.08645408.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <200408271247.i7RClGku009570@the-macgregors.org> <20040829.054111.102114690.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:35:55 +0200 To: Hiroki Sato From: Brad Knowles Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64bit time_t problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:48:26 -0000 At 5:41 AM +0900 2004-08-29, Hiroki Sato wrote: > m> AFAIK it's an NTP "issue" - your system is required to be within a > m> number of years of "now" for it to be set. Trawl > m> comp.protocols.time.ntp for details, or see the NTP documentation > m> on the NTP website (www.ntp.org) where I remember this being > m> discussed in the last few months (sorry I can't be more precise). > > Thanks for the pointer. I will look into them. You definitely don't want to try to use NTP to set the time if the offset is too large. Modern versions of ntpd can make a one-time stepping change if you add the "-g" option on the command line, but even that can only take you so far. While FreeBSD on sparc64 might now have a 64-bit time_t, but I don't know that the protocol can handle this large of a difference. Try setting the date manually to something reasonably close (i.e., less than 136 years), then using ntpd to get the "real" time. -- Brad Knowles, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755 SAGE member since 1995. See for more info. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 22:48:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F28716A4CE; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:48:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vhost109.his.com (vhost109.his.com [216.194.225.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B66D43D1D; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brad@stop.mail-abuse.org) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (localhost.his.com [127.0.0.1]) by vhost109.his.com (8.12.11/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i7SMmM2s032515; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:48:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from brad@stop.mail-abuse.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: bs663385@127.0.0.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040829.055715.02308074.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> References: <20040829.055715.02308074.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:38:00 +0200 To: Hiroki Sato From: Brad Knowles Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: U1E and U2 are supported system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:48:29 -0000 At 5:57 AM +0900 2004-08-29, Hiroki Sato wrote: > If so, I would like to move U1E and U2E to the "Fully Supported Systems" > section. I do not know about E3500 and E4500, but they use a different > controller chip? This is truly funny. The entire reason I subscribed to this mailing list just a few minutes ago is that I got an U2 last night, and I wanted to try to install FreeBSD on it. I read the exact same section you quoted, and was disappointed to think that I'd have to install OpenBSD, NetBSD, or Solaris instead. So, are U1E and U2 now actually supported with the on-board SCSI controller? -- Brad Knowles, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755 SAGE member since 1995. See for more info. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 22:58:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152F816A4CE; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:58:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B911E43D48; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:58:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7SMw7TH001642; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:58:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i7SMw6Wr001641; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:58:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:58:06 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: Brad Knowles Message-ID: <20040828225806.GB327@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20040829.055715.02308074.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Hiroki Sato cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: U1E and U2 are supported system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:58:08 -0000 On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 12:38:00AM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: > So, are U1E and U2 now actually supported with the on-board SCSI > controller? Yes. You'll need to get one of the 5.3-BETA releases for it to work. What's available on the FTP sites now is BETA1 but if you wait until tomorrow BETA2 should be there. The build machine is working on assembling the ISO's now. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |