From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 12:22:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D7716A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:22:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED94B43D2D for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:22:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9OCLtDH075011; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:51:55 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:51:43 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20041023044928.GC50202@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <20041023113751.5428da73.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20041023205852.GA57158@grimoire.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20041023205852.GA57158@grimoire.chen.org.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2247835.yOSgIWrDLU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410242151.54060.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 () IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: Torfinn Ingolfsen Subject: Re: burncd and mount_cd9660 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:22:16 -0000 --nextPart2247835.yOSgIWrDLU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 06:28, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > Some cd-writers *require* that you eject the newly-burnt cd and > > re-insert it, before the drive will read it. This _might_ be the problem > > you are seeing, if the cd image is correct (iso 9660). > > If only it were so... I forgot to add the obligatory "this used to > work under 4.10-STABLE" to my original post. Does "cdcontrol info" show the correct TOC? What is the error when you try and mount the disk? Can you dd the ISO off the disk? (ie dd if=3D/dev/acd0 of=3D/tmp/foo.iso bs-2048) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2247835.yOSgIWrDLU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBe55h5ZPcIHs/zowRApCBAJ91WrKwJUvvKOQANzD1brpR9embWwCfQCb/ fRJVdxqT8ZOrT0sYnOohMB0= =8JsO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2247835.yOSgIWrDLU-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 15:01:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029EC16A4CE; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:01:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.88.12.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0A943D2D; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:01:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CB2842284E; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:01:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:01:30 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041024150130.GN6156@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org References: <000b01c4b923$a49fda70$9d00000a@jara2> <417AE1E1.2010207@bfoz.net> <20041023235510.GE771@zaphod.nitro.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041023235510.GE771@zaphod.nitro.dk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:01:33 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 01:55:10AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2004.10.23 15:57:37 -0700, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > > Jack Raats wrote: > > >At this moment I cann't connect with ftp.freebsd.org.=20 > >=20 > > I've had the same problem all day. >=20 > The Danish part of ftp.freebsd.org (ftp.beastie.tdk.net) does not seem > to respond, I have poked one of the admins, but since it's late night > here in Denmark, it will probably be some hours before anyone can look > at the problem. >=20 beatie paniced at about 3 am CEST and was rebooted. I don't know what caused the panic, but I see quite a lot of: Oct 23 04:51:29 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 Oct 23 04:52:07 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 -erwin --=20 _._ _,-'""`-._ Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin@lansing.dk http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin@FreeBSD.org -bf- `- \`_`"'- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBe8PKqy9aWxUlaZARAhXDAKDjx4mi3c2Pvo3amyh5TLffByXgAgCfZFqd 6T/fnpgGdMeRngiKWcDdy+4= =wlzR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 17:06:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E147916A4CE; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:06:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from CPE000103d44c07-CM000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (CPE000103d44c07-CM000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.193.222.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCF643D39; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:06:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from 192.168.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id 0332B295451; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:05:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 192.168.0.188 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mikej); by 192.168.0.1 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:05:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2331.192.168.0.188.1098637550.squirrel@192.168.0.188> In-Reply-To: <20041024150130.GN6156@droso.net> References: <000b01c4b923$a49fda70$9d00000a@jara2> <417AE1E1.2010207@bfoz.net> <20041023235510.GE771@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20041024150130.GN6156@droso.net> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:05:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-wettoast-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-wettoast-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: mikej@rogers.com cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:06:06 -0000 Erwin Lansing said: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 01:55:10AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: >> On 2004.10.23 15:57:37 -0700, Brandon Fosdick wrote: >> > Jack Raats wrote: >> > >At this moment I cann't connect with ftp.freebsd.org. >> > >> > I've had the same problem all day. >> >> The Danish part of ftp.freebsd.org (ftp.beastie.tdk.net) does not seem >> to respond, I have poked one of the admins, but since it's late night >> here in Denmark, it will probably be some hours before anyone can look >> at the problem. >> > beatie paniced at about 3 am CEST and was rebooted. > > I don't know what caused the panic, but I see quite a lot of: > Oct 23 04:51:29 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: > #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 > Oct 23 04:52:07 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: > #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 Looks like hard disk problems to me. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 17:18:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943A716A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:18:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92.asp.att.net [204.127.203.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FFC43D55 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:18:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (12-216-240-169.client.mchsi.com[12.216.240.169]) by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with ESMTP id <20041024171856m9200k07boe>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:18:56 +0000 Message-ID: <417BE400.8090506@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:18:56 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041018 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: /dev/fd/3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:18:57 -0000 I have a program that needs to write to file descriptor 3 via /dev/fd/3. But FreeBSD-5.3 doesn't let me do that, since only fd/0-2 exist. How do I do this? "man fd" didn't help me. Stephen From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 17:49:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD45F16A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:49:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF0743D39 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:49:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9OHnMUY088968; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:49:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i9OHnM44088965; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:49:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:49:22 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith In-Reply-To: <417BE400.8090506@math.missouri.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/fd/3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:49:46 -0000 On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I have a program that needs to write to file descriptor 3 via /dev/fd/3. > But FreeBSD-5.3 doesn't let me do that, since only fd/0-2 exist. How > do I do this? "man fd" didn't help me. By default, /dev/fd is services by devfs, and is initialized by fildesc_drvinit() in kern_descrip.c. It creates a hard-coded three entries: dev = make_dev(&fildesc_cdevsw, 0, UID_ROOT, GID_WHEEL, 0666, "fd/0"); make_dev_alias(dev, "stdin"); dev = make_dev(&fildesc_cdevsw, 1, UID_ROOT, GID_WHEEL, 0666, "fd/1"); make_dev_alias(dev, "stdout"); dev = make_dev(&fildesc_cdevsw, 2, UID_ROOT, GID_WHEEL, 0666, "fd/2"); make_dev_alias(dev, "stderr"); You can mount fdescfs on top of /dev/fd using the following command as root: mount -t fdescfs fdescfs /dev/fd This will cause the number of entries in /dev/fd to correspond to the number of file descriptors the current process has open. I'm not sure if there are caveats associated with that approach, but from a simple experiment here it appears to work. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 17:58:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8025016A4CE; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:58:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDA343D45; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:58:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9OHwLcN089094; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:58:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i9OHwLQP089091; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:58:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:58:21 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20041024150130.GN6156@droso.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:58:45 -0000 On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Erwin Lansing wrote: > > The Danish part of ftp.freebsd.org (ftp.beastie.tdk.net) does not seem > > to respond, I have poked one of the admins, but since it's late night > > here in Denmark, it will probably be some hours before anyone can look > > at the problem. > > > beatie paniced at about 3 am CEST and was rebooted. > > I don't know what caused the panic, but I see quite a lot of: > Oct 23 04:51:29 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: > #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 > Oct 23 04:52:07 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: > #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 The swap pager will wait hz*20 (20 seconds) for pages to be read back in from the swap space -- if it doesn't hear back in that time, it generates the above warning and then continue waiting. Typically, that kind of wait might occur because of a hardware problem. Did you see any related console output from the controller/device driver? Typically having swap space disappear out from under the system is not good for the health of the system... Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 19:39:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DDB16A4CE; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:39:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D86343D4C; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:39:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (12-216-240-169.client.mchsi.com[12.216.240.169]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with ESMTP id <20041024193913m9100ceebhe>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:39:13 +0000 Message-ID: <417C04E1.2040207@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:39:13 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041018 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/fd/3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:39:14 -0000 Robert Watson wrote: > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > >>I have a program that needs to write to file descriptor 3 via /dev/fd/3. >> But FreeBSD-5.3 doesn't let me do that, since only fd/0-2 exist. How >>do I do this? "man fd" didn't help me. > > > You can mount fdescfs on top of /dev/fd using the following command as > root: > > mount -t fdescfs fdescfs /dev/fd > Thanks - it works. How about adding fdescfs(5) to the "SEE ALSO" section of "man fd"? Stephen From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 19:44:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D49A16A4CE; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:44:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735B143D1F; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:44:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F04551495; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:45:28 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041024194528.GA70412@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <000b01c4b923$a49fda70$9d00000a@jara2> <417AE1E1.2010207@bfoz.net> <20041023235510.GE771@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20041024150130.GN6156@droso.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041024150130.GN6156@droso.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: ftp.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:44:51 -0000 --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 05:01:30PM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 01:55:10AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > On 2004.10.23 15:57:37 -0700, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > > > Jack Raats wrote: > > > >At this moment I cann't connect with ftp.freebsd.org.=20 > > >=20 > > > I've had the same problem all day. > >=20 > > The Danish part of ftp.freebsd.org (ftp.beastie.tdk.net) does not seem > > to respond, I have poked one of the admins, but since it's late night > > here in Denmark, it will probably be some hours before anyone can look > > at the problem. > >=20 > beatie paniced at about 3 am CEST and was rebooted. >=20 > I don't know what caused the panic, but I see quite a lot of: > Oct 23 04:51:29 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: > #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 > Oct 23 04:52:07 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: > #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 Usually means a dying disk. Kris --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBfAZYWry0BWjoQKURAkKzAKDTMawaBVI1Vc9h0+lOuteoXmcb/QCbBqQa P1678tKP8AtZtAMR9GONW6k= =nSEu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 19:45:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34C016A4D0 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:45:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F6343D2D for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:45:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9OJidt0090597; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:44:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i9OJid9Y090594; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:44:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:44:39 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith In-Reply-To: <417C04E1.2040207@math.missouri.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/fd/3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:45:04 -0000 On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >>I have a program that needs to write to file descriptor 3 via /dev/fd/3. > >> But FreeBSD-5.3 doesn't let me do that, since only fd/0-2 exist. How > >>do I do this? "man fd" didn't help me. > > > > > > You can mount fdescfs on top of /dev/fd using the following command as > > root: > > > > mount -t fdescfs fdescfs /dev/fd > > Thanks - it works. > > How about adding fdescfs(5) to the "SEE ALSO" section of "man fd"? Sounds good -- I've added a cross reference and a note on why it might be useful to fd.4 in CVS HEAD. I'll merge to RELENG_5 once the 5.3 code freeze is lifted. Thanks, Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 19:54:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39CA16A4CE; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:54:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.88.12.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F94343D1D; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:54:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7A4B62282C; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:54:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:54:46 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041024195446.GA13014@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20041024150130.GN6156@droso.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: ftp.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:54:47 -0000 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 06:58:21PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: >=20 > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Erwin Lansing wrote: >=20 > > > The Danish part of ftp.freebsd.org (ftp.beastie.tdk.net) does not seem > > > to respond, I have poked one of the admins, but since it's late night > > > here in Denmark, it will probably be some hours before anyone can look > > > at the problem. > > >=20 > > beatie paniced at about 3 am CEST and was rebooted. > >=20 > > I don't know what caused the panic, but I see quite a lot of: > > Oct 23 04:51:29 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: > > #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 > > Oct 23 04:52:07 ftp /kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: > > #da/0x2 0001, blkno: 544, size: 4096 >=20 > The swap pager will wait hz*20 (20 seconds) for pages to be read back in > from the swap space -- if it doesn't hear back in that time, it generates > the above warning and then continue waiting. Typically, that kind of wait > might occur because of a hardware problem. Did you see any related > console output from the controller/device driver? Typically having swap > space disappear out from under the system is not good for the health of > the system... >=20 Also my thoughts that a disk is dying, but the controller is reporting everything as optimal. There should also be enough memory, so it's not really using swap space. I'll keep a close look with it, but this is really bad timing :( --=20 _._ _,-'""`-._ Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin@lansing.dk http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin@FreeBSD.org -bf- `- \`_`"'- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBfAiGqy9aWxUlaZARAqT2AJ0V1J2ET6UUQG5UMSt6ZB759G4NhgCfZDNF 9GVQipjxZLA45Xj/fAaqz9Q= =ddt5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 21:20:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E9916A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:20:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5D643D2D for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:20:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 4B1CA5313; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:20:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 07EA95310; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:19:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id B9246B85E; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:19:56 +0200 (CEST) To: Shogan2k1@aol.com References: <1b9.4754346.2eab583b@aol.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:19:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1b9.4754346.2eab583b@aol.com> (Shogan2k1@aol.com's message of "Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:46:19 EDT") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.64 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where to get 5.3 Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:20:06 -0000 Shogan2k1@aol.com writes: > Everyone keep on saying they have problem running 5.3 stable. But is > 5.3 stable really out? I can't find it anywhere. 5.3-RELEASE isn't out yet, but you can get 5.3-STABLE by cvsup'ing the RELENG_5 tag. > Only 5.3 I got is > the RC1 version, but it always give me the ad0 Warning: DMA_READ and > DMA_WRITE INTERRUPT ... message, so I installed 5.2.1 instead. What kind of disks, what kind of disk controller, what kind of motherboard? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 00:22:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AE416A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:22:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (86.Red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2461A43D5D for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:22:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd-questions@biaix.org) Received: (qmail 36834 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Oct 2004 00:20:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:20:08 +0200 From: Joan Picanyol To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041025002008.GA36161@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: process stuck in nfsfsync state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:22:32 -0000 [please honour Mail-Followup-To:, no need to keep the crosspost] This is a repost of http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041014110752.GA57541, with some additional information. I've updated the client to RC1, and the problem still persists. In short, a 5.3-RC1 client mounting /home off a 4.10-p3 server can't use the NFS fs anymore when trying to start GNOME, since gconfd and gnome-session are in nfsfsync state. Any process accessing the fs hungs, and the console gets full of nfs server grummit:/fs/home/mount: not responding messages, even though the client can still ping the server and other mount points are still available. AFAICT, nfsd and friends are running both on the client and the server, and the client can use RPC properly (checked via rpcinfo). Also, doing 'tcpdump -vv -s 192 port nfs' on the client and the server seems support the hypothesis of a locking issue, since I see a write request for the same fh repeating over and over. The trace of gnome-session is as follows: db> tr 610 sched_switch(c180b4b0,0,1,11d,27b8ea4) at sched_switch+0x190 mi_switch(1,0,c063d701,19d,2) at mi_switch+0x2ac sleepq_switch(c216d23c,c0639f0f,18e,2,da518a5c) at sleepq_switch+0x134 sleepq_wait(c216d23c,0,c063b2f5,db,0) at sleepq_wait+0x41 msleep(c216d23c,c216d210,4d,c1906703,0) at msleep+0x3b5 nfs_flush(c216d210,c17fed00,1,c180b4b0,0) at nfs_flush+0x961 nfs_close(da518b8c,1,c0643a5e,140,c0681da0) at nfs_close+0x7e vn_close(c216d210,2,c17fed00,c180b4b0,c0692c20) at vn_close+0x67 vn_closefile(c1c2b6e8,c180b4b0,c0637a98,829,c1c2b6e8) at vn_closefile+0xc4 fdrop_locked(c1c2b6e8,c180b4b0,c0637a98,768) at fdrop_locked+0xb4 fdrop(c1c2b6e8,c180b4b0,3,c180b4b0,da518c98) at fdrop+0x3c closef(c1c2b6e8,c180b4b0,c0637a98,3e3,0) at closef+0x21c close(c180b4b0,da518d14,4,431,1) at close+0x135 syscall(2f,2f,2f,0,28d38ec0) at syscall+0x272 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f --- syscall (6, FreeBSD ELF32, close), eip = 0x28ca1e6f, esp = 0xbfbfe52c, ebp = 0xbfbfe538 --- I have a debugging kernel and a console attached, feel free to ask for any other information of interest. This is driving me nuts, and I'm surely not the only one using GNOME over NFS, is anyone else seeing this? What exactly is going on? How can I fix it? It might be that the problem appeared going from BETA3 to BETA6, but I've been unable to "downgrade" the workstation; where can I get a copy of BETA3 to test this? tks -- pica From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 05:16:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23FF16A4CF for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:16:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from titania.auscert.org.au (gw.auscert.org.au [203.5.112.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25D543D2F for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:16:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (app [10.0.1.192])i9P5E46t053033 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:14:04 +1000 (EST) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by app.auscert.org.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9P5GqiP019297 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:16:52 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <200410250516.i9P5GqiP019297@app.auscert.org.au> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:19:56 +0200." Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:16:52 +1000 Subject: Re: Where to get 5.3 Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:16:55 -0000 > Shogan2k1@aol.com writes: > > Everyone keep on saying they have problem running 5.3 stable. But is > > 5.3 stable really out? I can't find it anywhere. > > 5.3-RELEASE isn't out yet, but you can get 5.3-STABLE by cvsup'ing > the RELENG_5 tag. > As RELENG_5_3 has been branched, I have been tracking this release - I presume this is the same as RELENG_5 until 5.3 RELEASE is frozen (already?), but will then only change for security patches. (Someone please correct me if this is an incorrect assumption) joel From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 08:58:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BF116A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:58:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (86.Red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6775543D2D for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:58:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 39829 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Oct 2004 08:55:59 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:55:59 +0200 From: Joan Picanyol To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20041025085559.GA39457@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ken Smith , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20041025002008.GA36161@grummit.biaix.org> <20041025035125.GB23622@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041025035125.GB23622@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:58:21 -0000 * Ken Smith [20041025 05:49]: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 02:20:08AM +0200, Joan Picanyol wrote: > > > This is driving me nuts, and I'm surely not the only one using GNOME > > over NFS, is anyone else seeing this? What exactly is going on? How can > > I fix it? It might be that the problem appeared going from BETA3 to > > BETA6, but I've been unable to "downgrade" the workstation; where can I > > get a copy of BETA3 to test this? > > Are you running the lock daemon on the server? Yes, on both client and server, and the client can see it running too: joan@calvin:~(0)$ rpcinfo -s grummit program version(s) netid(s) service owner 100000 2 udp,tcp portmapper unknown 100004 2,1 tcp,udp ypserv unknown 100005 1,3 tcp,udp mountd unknown 100003 3,2 tcp,udp nfs unknown 100021 4,3,1 tcp,udp nlockmgr unknown 100024 1 tcp,udp status unknown joan@calvin:~(0)$ rpcinfo -s calvin program version(s) netid(s) service owner 100000 2,3,4 local,udp,tcp portmapper superuser 100007 2 tcp,udp ypbind superuser 100024 1 tcp,udp status superuser 100021 4,3,1,0 tcp,udp nlockmgr superuser tks -- pica From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 09:25:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C8516A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:25:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (86.Red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2012143D2D for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:25:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd-stable@biaix.org) Received: (qmail 40445 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Oct 2004 09:23:30 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:23:30 +0200 From: Joan Picanyol To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20041025092330.GB39457@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Watson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20041025002008.GA36161@grummit.biaix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:25:51 -0000 * Robert Watson [20041025 10:42]: > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Joan Picanyol wrote: > > > [please honour Mail-Followup-To:, no need to keep the crosspost] > > Hmm. Don't see one of those, maybe it was trimmed by Mailman? Just checked, must have been. Maybe because it only had -stable@ on it... > > Also, doing 'tcpdump -vv -s 192 port nfs' on the client and the server > > seems support the hypothesis of a locking issue, since I see a write > > request for the same fh repeating over and over. > > Is there an response to the request? If not, that might suggest the > server is wedged, not the client. If you are willing to share the results > of a tcpdump -s 1500 -w output from a few seconds during the > wedge, that would be very useful. Available at http://biaix.org/pk/debug/nfs/ These are from just after logging in to GNOME until gconfd-2 goes to nfsfsync, and the nfs server not responding messages start appearing. > Also useful would be the output of "netstat -na | grep 2049" on the client > and server Nothing special, it's the same before and after the wedge (grummit is the server, calvin the client): calvin# netstat -na | grep 2049 udp4 0 0 192.168.124.9.943 192.168.124.1.2049 udp4 0 0 192.168.124.9.600 192.168.124.1.2049 joan@grummit:~(0)$ netstat -an | grep 2049 tcp4 0 0 *.2049 *.* LISTEN udp4 0 0 *.2049 *.* FYI, calvin is an SMP box, debug.mpsafenet=0 and the NIC is an xl. tks -- pica From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 09:30:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A8C16A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:30:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3282D43D1D for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:30:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id D4CA75310; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:30:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 2FBF85316; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:30:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 0B877B85E; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:30:46 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au References: <200410250516.i9P5GqiP019297@app.auscert.org.au> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:30:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200410250516.i9P5GqiP019297@app.auscert.org.au> (freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:16:52 +1000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.64 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where to get 5.3 Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:30:53 -0000 freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au writes: > As RELENG_5_3 has been branched, I have been tracking this release - I > presume this is the same as RELENG_5 until 5.3 RELEASE is frozen > (already?), but will then only change for security patches. (Someone plea= se > correct me if this is an incorrect assumption) RELENG_5_3 will be a errata branch and will receive important bug fixes in addition to security patches. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 12:26:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CB016A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:26:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E6043D4C for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:26:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9PCPoYX004856; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:25:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i9PCPn1S004853; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:25:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:25:49 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Joan Picanyol In-Reply-To: <20041025092330.GB39457@grummit.biaix.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:26:19 -0000 On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Joan Picanyol wrote: > > Is there an response to the request? If not, that might suggest the > > server is wedged, not the client. If you are willing to share the results > > of a tcpdump -s 1500 -w output from a few seconds during the > > wedge, that would be very useful. > > Available at http://biaix.org/pk/debug/nfs/ These are from just after > logging in to GNOME until gconfd-2 goes to nfsfsync, and the nfs server > not responding messages start appearing. Comparing the client and server traces, it looks like fragments in the client-generated writes are being lost. For example, frame 4175 in the client trace is a fragmented NFSv3 write over UDP. The total datagram size is 8192, but it's broken down into six IP fragments: Frame IP offset Length Arrived? 4175 0 1480 Yes 4176 1480 1480 Yes 4177 2960 1480 Yes 4178 4440 1480 Yes 4179 5920 1480 No 4180 7400 944 Yes Without the missing fragments, the datagrams (and hence RPCs) can't be reassembled, and with 6-fragment datagrams, even fairly low probability loss for individual packets adds up (or multiplies up!). So the question is: where are your fragments going? Since the fragments all ended up in the BPF trace on the client, we know that sufficient mbufs could be allocated on that side to build not only the datagram but the fragment stream, as well as insert it into the interface queue without an overflow; they could still have been dropped at a low level in the driver. Since they don't appear, even corrupted, in the server trace, we know they either didn't reach the server or were dropped very early in processing in the driver. Dropping in the IP stack would occur after the packet was submitted to BPF. So if possible, I might try some of the following: - Substituting a different switch or hub between the two systems, and looking for possible chronic sources of packet loss between them. - If possible, getting a trace of the packets on an intermediate node to see whether the packets were really sent or not. Maybe on a monitor port on the switch, or by inserting a bridging node. My suspicion is either that the sender is dropping them at a low level in the driver, perhaps due to a resource leak, or that they're dropped on the way through an intermediate node. Maybe something is particularly sensitive to the rapid sequential send of the 6 fragments. - Perhaps instrumenting the device drivers on the sender and recipient to look for possible areas where packet drops are being triggered. - I think someone already suggested disabling hardware checksumming, but if you haven't tried that, it would be worth trying it. - It would be useful to see if less complicated NFS meta-transactions than "Start GTK" can trigger the problem. For example, doing a large dd to a file in NFS, varying the blocksize to see if you can find useful thresholds that trigger the problem. I see a lot of successful 512 byte writes in the trace, but larger datagram sizes of 8192 for writes seem to have problems. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 12:38:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA94616A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:38:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8975043D41 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:38:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9PCbaKR005129; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:37:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i9PCbZTd005126; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:37:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:37:35 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au In-Reply-To: <200410250516.i9P5GqiP019297@app.auscert.org.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where to get 5.3 Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:38:07 -0000 On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au wrote: > > Shogan2k1@aol.com writes: > > > Everyone keep on saying they have problem running 5.3 stable. But is > > > 5.3 stable really out? I can't find it anywhere. > > > > 5.3-RELEASE isn't out yet, but you can get 5.3-STABLE by cvsup'ing > > the RELENG_5 tag. > > As RELENG_5_3 has been branched, I have been tracking this release - I > presume this is the same as RELENG_5 until 5.3 RELEASE is frozen > (already?), but will then only change for security patches. (Someone > please correct me if this is an incorrect assumption) With the advent of 5.3, the intent is to expand the coverage of changes in the RELENG_MAJOR_MINOR branch to include critical other fixes in addition to the normal security fixes going into the branch. For example, if there is a critical stability fix for a driver or other system component. We also intend to adopt this approach for future 4.x releases. The bar will be high for changes to go into the branch, and will result in errata announcements (exact format to be determined) in much the same way we currently produce security advisories. The branch will remain "owned" by the security officer team, and any stability fixes will be merged by the release engineering team in close coordination with the security officer team. It is not the intent that the branches become "-STABLE" substitutes, since they won't be getting feature enhancements. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 12:52:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C443816A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:52:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from atlas03.atlassolutions.net (atlas03.atlassolutions.net [213.229.188.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD24143D53 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:52:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliver@citatabacos.com) Received: from psique (100.Red-213-97-238.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.238.100]) by atlas03.atlasit.com for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:52:48 +0200 Message-ID: <02f201c4ba91$f9f95db0$33017f80@psique> From: "Oliver Torres Delgado" To: Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:55:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:52:44 -0000 I have freebsd 5.3 rc1 installed perfectly, i configure vinum with the = handbook and all work perfect but when try run vinum with rc.conf there display the error: panic: unmount: dangling vnode cpuid: 0 uptime=3D 4s Cannot dump. No dump device defined Automatic reboot in 15 seconds. why happened ? I configure freebsd 4.x with this config and work = perfectly :( thx to alls. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 16:11:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091C916A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:11:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (86.Red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB39043D53 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd-stable@biaix.org) Received: (qmail 42188 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Oct 2004 16:09:30 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:09:30 +0200 From: Joan Picanyol To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20041025160930.GA41784@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Watson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20041025092330.GB39457@grummit.biaix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:11:51 -0000 * Robert Watson [20041025 14:24]: > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Joan Picanyol wrote: > > > > Is there an response to the request? If not, that might suggest the > > > server is wedged, not the client. If you are willing to share the results > > > of a tcpdump -s 1500 -w output from a few seconds during the > > > wedge, that would be very useful. > > > > Available at http://biaix.org/pk/debug/nfs/ These are from just after > > logging in to GNOME until gconfd-2 goes to nfsfsync, and the nfs server > > not responding messages start appearing. > [snip *much* appreciated detailed analysis] > So if possible, I might try some of the following: [...] > - I think someone already suggested disabling hardware checksumming, but > if you haven't tried that, it would be worth trying it. No difference. > - It would be useful to see if less complicated NFS meta-transactions than > "Start GTK" can trigger the problem. For example, doing a large dd to a > file in NFS, varying the blocksize to see if you can find useful > thresholds that trigger the problem. I see a lot of successful 512 byte > writes in the trace, but larger datagram sizes of 8192 for writes seem > to have problems. Now this is interesting: dd if=/dev/urandom of=/fs/bulk/mount/dummy bs=512 count=14 wedges the NFS mount point 100% of the times. Lowering the count to 13 doesn't reproduce the hang. An another possibly interesting data point is that NFS over TCP works ok. For this I'm particularly grateful, since I can now mount my /home fs and do my work. Am I the only one seeing this? tks -- pica From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 16:29:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A92516A4CF for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:29:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.manuelmartini.it (fast.tomato.it [62.101.64.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2F4743D48 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:29:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@gufi.org) Received: (qmail 1998 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Oct 2004 16:29:52 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:29:52 +0200 From: Manuel Martini To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041025162952.GA1974@Delorien> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-Disclaimer: Martin Powered by FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Dell CERC SATA RAID controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: martin@gufi.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:29:54 -0000 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi all A client is buying some Dell Power Edge 700 servers. Looking at the caratteristics of the producer, it has a CERC SATA RAID 6 channel. =46rom the Freebsd compatibility list i can see that the driver i could use is aac(4) for CERC SATA RAID 2 Can i use aac driver for the CERC SATA RAID 6 channel controller? I must install Freebsd 4.10 and 5.3 can anyone help me to solve this my big trouble? =09 thank you very much --=20 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBfSn+8T4XZ3+2W6URAhEAAJ93vKm0c4pSuw7olYZxwKNDV+R99QCfWXue 1XT7Zjvgj/jD2UhTnr2P928= =iyEW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 16:40:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7389016A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:40:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF1943D58 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:40:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from security@jim-liesl.org) Received: from smtp.jim-liesl.org ([68.71.52.28]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20041025164033.EAYY15118.mta13.adelphia.net@smtp.jim-liesl.org> for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:40:33 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.jim-liesl.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDAE152B6 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:40:31 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <417D2CA5.2090000@jim-liesl.org> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:41:09 -0600 From: secmgr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Fwd: Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:40:34 -0000 >I have freebsd 5.3 rc1 installed perfectly, i configure vinum with the handbook and all work perfect >but when try run vinum with rc.conf there display the error: > >panic: unmount: dangling vnode >cpuid: 0 >uptime= 4s >Cannot dump. No dump device defined >Automatic reboot in 15 seconds. > >why happened ? I configure freebsd 4.x with this config and work perfectly :( > >thx to alls. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > just hit the same exact thing myself. two single drive plexes, mirored. If I boot standalone, bring up vinum by hand, and then mount the mirror, it's fine. Only happens when I use the start_vinum="YES" in rc.conf. jim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 17:30:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F70F16A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:30:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from baton.cs.ucdavis.edu (baton.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.6.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3AE43D3F for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:30:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from abkonstantinov@ucdavis.edu) Received: from baton.cs.ucdavis.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i9PHUfHD000592 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu (sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.5.149]) i9PHUfBu000587 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9PHUfuZ005150 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:30:41 -0700 Received: (from konstant@localhost) by sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9PHUfCc005148 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:30:41 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu: konstant set sender to abkonstantinov@ucdavis.edu using -f From: Andrew Konstantinov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <02f201c4ba91$f9f95db0$33017f80@psique> References: <02f201c4ba91$f9f95db0$33017f80@psique> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098725440.5103.4.camel@sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-1) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:30:41 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on baton.cs.ucdavis.edu Subject: Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:30:43 -0000 On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 05:55, Oliver Torres Delgado wrote: > I have freebsd 5.3 rc1 installed perfectly, i configure vinum with the handbook and all work perfect > but when try run vinum with rc.conf there display the error: > > panic: unmount: dangling vnode > cpuid: 0 > uptime= 4s > Cannot dump. No dump device defined > Automatic reboot in 15 seconds. > > why happened ? I configure freebsd 4.x with this config and work perfectly :( Just like me, you should have checked the mailing list archive first. Here is a nice solution: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-August/035547.html I switched from 5.2.1 to 5.3 and had the same problem which you'ved described above. Once I've switched to gvinum, everything went back to normal. Andrew From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 20:20:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C769B16A568 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:20:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED2143D1D for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from security@jim-liesl.org) Received: from smtp.jim-liesl.org ([68.71.52.28]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20041025202057.KYGV18454.mta10.adelphia.net@smtp.jim-liesl.org> for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:20:57 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.jim-liesl.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AB6152B6 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:20:56 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <417D604D.4090800@jim-liesl.org> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:21:33 -0600 From: secmgr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <02f201c4ba91$f9f95db0$33017f80@psique> <1098725440.5103.4.camel@sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu> In-Reply-To: <1098725440.5103.4.camel@sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:20:58 -0000 Andrew Konstantinov wrote: >On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 05:55, Oliver Torres Delgado wrote: > > >>I have freebsd 5.3 rc1 installed perfectly, i configure vinum with the handbook and all work perfect >>but when try run vinum with rc.conf there display the error: >> >>panic: unmount: dangling vnode >>cpuid: 0 >>uptime= 4s >>Cannot dump. No dump device defined >>Automatic reboot in 15 seconds. >> >> >Just like me, you should have checked the mailing list archive first. >Here is a nice solution: >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-August/035547.html >I switched from 5.2.1 to 5.3 and had the same problem which you'ved >described above. Once I've switched to gvinum, everything went back to >normal. > >Andrew > > thanks, I appreciate the pointer. That being said, if this is a "KNOWN" problem (as far back as August) how come no mention in either the release notes OR errata. I like and use FreeBSD for it's stability, but at this point in time, I've got broken vinum-classic (with workarounds) raid5 in 4.10 and raid 1 in 5.3-stable. Both of these installed per current documentation. I haven't logged bug reports becasue it seems like everything is moving to gvinum, and they'd probably just end up closed out as FINV jim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 12:36:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948E716A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:36:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C67E943D39 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:36:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 8752 invoked by uid 513); 26 Oct 2004 12:36:42 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.362123 secs); 26 Oct 2004 12:36:42 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 12:36:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:36:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041026141721.X816@pukruppa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:36:40 -0000 Hi! I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed something new. I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). These are my rc.conf lines: kern_securelevel_enable="NO" inetd_enable="YES" gateway_enable="YES" named_enable="YES" ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="YES" ppp_profile="my-profile" Thanks for any hints, Uli. +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 12:57:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2C516A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:57:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vision-bsd.nl (kf-sdm-cb01-0127.dial.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.26.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3AC543D3F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:57:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@vision-bsd.nl) Received: (qmail 50274 invoked by uid 1018); 26 Oct 2004 12:57:51 -0000 Received: from sam@vision-bsd.nl by freebsd.sam.intern by uid 1016 with qmail-scanner-1.22-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.75. spamassassin: 3.0.1. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.160883 secs); 26 Oct 2004 12:57:51 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: sam@vision-bsd.nl via freebsd.sam.intern X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.22-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.160883 secs Process 50269) Received: from localhost (HELO www.vision-bsd.nl) (127.0.0.1) by vision-bsd.nl with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 12:57:50 -0000 Received: from maquis.kabelfoon.nl ([62.45.52.90]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user sam@vision-bsd.nl); by www.vision-bsd.nl with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:57:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4018.62.45.52.90.1098795470.squirrel@62.45.52.90> In-Reply-To: <20041026141721.X816@pukruppa.net> References: <20041026141721.X816@pukruppa.net> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:57:50 +0200 (CEST) From: "Samuel Trommel" To: "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:57:54 -0000 Hello, It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following: - show us your /etc/resolv.conf - are you really sure named is configured correctly? greets, Samuel Trommel > > Hi! > > I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed > something new. > > I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. > Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >>From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but > domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). > > These are my rc.conf lines: > > kern_securelevel_enable="NO" > inetd_enable="YES" > gateway_enable="YES" > named_enable="YES" > ppp_enable="YES" > ppp_mode="ddial" > ppp_nat="YES" > ppp_profile="my-profile" > > > Thanks for any hints, > > Uli. > > > +---------------------------+ > | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | > | Wuppertal | > | Germany | > +---------------------------+ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 13:04:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A30416A4D0 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:04:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-09.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C95543D3F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:04:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from talbotn@ihug.com.au) Received: (qmail 11670 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2004 13:04:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caroline) (203.206.233.169) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 13:04:53 -0000 Message-ID: <004701c4bb5c$60ddf200$6401a8c0@ctsinc.com.au> From: "Talbot Neil" To: Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:04:50 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0043_01C4BBB0.322E4D70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Atheros Wireless Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:04:58 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0043_01C4BBB0.322E4D70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, I am having troubles compiling the atheros card into the kernel.=20 I am getting compilation errors as follows: -----SNIP------ linking kernel if_ath.o(.text+0x6c): In function `ath_attach': : undefined reference to `ath_hal_attach' if_ath.o(.text+0x3073): In function `ath_tx_start': : undefined reference to `ath_hal_computetxtime' if_ath.o(.text+0x30d0): In function `ath_tx_start': : undefined reference to `ath_hal_computetxtime' if_ath.o(.text+0x30ed): In function `ath_tx_start': : undefined reference to `ath_hal_computetxtime' if_ath.o(.text+0x310f): In function `ath_tx_start': : undefined reference to `ath_hal_computetxtime' if_ath.o(.text+0x4113): In function `ath_getchannels': : undefined reference to `ath_hal_init_channels' if_ath.o(.text+0x4160): In function `ath_getchannels': : undefined reference to `ath_hal_mhz2ieee' if_ath.o(.data+0x20): undefined reference to `sysctl__hw_ath_children' if_ath.o(.data+0x60): undefined reference to `sysctl__hw_ath_children' if_ath.o(.data+0xa0): undefined reference to `sysctl__hw_ath_children' if_ath.o(.data+0x100): undefined reference to `sysctl__hw_ath_children' if_ath.o(.data+0x160): undefined reference to `sysctl__hw_ath_children' if_ath.o(.data+0x1a0): more undefined references to = `sysctl__hw_ath_children' follow if_ath_pci.o(.text+0xae): In function `ath_pci_probe': : undefined reference to `ath_hal_probe' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WirelessFirewallNAT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D END My Kernel Config is attached. Thanks Guys Talbot ------=_NextPart_000_0043_01C4BBB0.322E4D70 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="WirelessFirewallNAT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="WirelessFirewallNAT" # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/WirelessFirewallNAT,v 1.0 2004/10/26 = 21:14:00 talbotn Exp $=0A= =0A= machine i386=0A= cpu I486_CPU=0A= cpu I586_CPU=0A= cpu I686_CPU=0A= ident WirelessFirewallNAT=0A= =0A= options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler=0A= options INET # InterNETworking=0A= options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols=0A= options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem=0A= options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support=0A= options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists=0A= options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories=0A= options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device=0A= options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client=0A= options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server=0A= options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT=0A= options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem=0A= options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem=0A= options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS)=0A= options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework=0A= options GEOM_GPT # GUID Partition Tables.=0A= options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!]=0A= options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4=0A= options SCSI_DELAY=3D15000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI=0A= options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support=0A= options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory=0A= options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues=0A= options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores=0A= options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time = extensions=0A= options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev=0A= options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug=0A= # output. Adds ~128k to driver.=0A= options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug=0A= # output. Adds ~215k to driver.=0A= options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive.=0A= =0A= device apic # I/O APIC=0A= =0A= # Bus support. Do not remove isa, even if you have no isa slots=0A= device isa=0A= device eisa=0A= device pci=0A= =0A= # Floppy drives=0A= device fdc=0A= =0A= # ATA and ATAPI devices=0A= device ata=0A= device atadisk # ATA disk drives=0A= device ataraid # ATA RAID drives=0A= device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives=0A= device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives=0A= device atapist # ATAPI tape drives=0A= options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering=0A= =0A= # SCSI Controllers=0A= device ahb # EISA AHA1742 family=0A= device ahc # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices=0A= device ahd # AHA39320/29320 and onboard AIC79xx devices=0A= device amd # AMD 53C974 (Tekram DC-390(T))=0A= device isp # Qlogic family=0A= device mpt # LSI-Logic MPT-Fusion=0A= #device ncr # NCR/Symbios Logic=0A= device sym # NCR/Symbios Logic (newer chipsets + those of `ncr')=0A= device trm # Tekram DC395U/UW/F DC315U adapters=0A= =0A= device adv # Advansys SCSI adapters=0A= device adw # Advansys wide SCSI adapters=0A= device aha # Adaptec 154x SCSI adapters=0A= device aic # Adaptec 15[012]x SCSI adapters, AIC-6[23]60.=0A= device bt # Buslogic/Mylex MultiMaster SCSI adapters=0A= =0A= device ncv # NCR 53C500=0A= device nsp # Workbit Ninja SCSI-3=0A= device stg # TMC 18C30/18C50=0A= =0A= # SCSI peripherals=0A= device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI)=0A= device ch # SCSI media changers=0A= device da # Direct Access (disks)=0A= device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc)=0A= device cd # CD=0A= device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access)=0A= device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE)=0A= =0A= # RAID controllers interfaced to the SCSI subsystem=0A= device amr # AMI MegaRAID=0A= device asr # DPT SmartRAID V, VI and Adaptec SCSI RAID=0A= device ciss # Compaq Smart RAID 5*=0A= device dpt # DPT Smartcache III, IV - See NOTES for options=0A= device hptmv # Highpoint RocketRAID 182x=0A= device iir # Intel Integrated RAID=0A= device ips # IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID=0A= device mly # Mylex AcceleRAID/eXtremeRAID=0A= device twa # 3ware 9000 series PATA/SATA RAID=0A= =0A= # RAID controllers=0A= device aac # Adaptec FSA RAID=0A= device aacp # SCSI passthrough for aac (requires CAM)=0A= device ida # Compaq Smart RAID=0A= device mlx # Mylex DAC960 family=0A= device pst # Promise Supertrak SX6000=0A= device twe # 3ware ATA RAID=0A= =0A= # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse=0A= device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller=0A= device atkbd # AT keyboard=0A= device psm # PS/2 mouse=0A= =0A= device vga # VGA video card driver=0A= =0A= device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support=0A= =0A= # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console=0A= device sc=0A= =0A= # Enable this for the pcvt (VT220 compatible) console driver=0A= device vt=0A= options XSERVER # support for X server on a vt console=0A= options FAT_CURSOR # start with block cursor=0A= =0A= device agp # support several AGP chipsets=0A= =0A= # Floating point support - do not disable.=0A= device npx=0A= =0A= # Power management support (see NOTES for more options)=0A= device apm=0A= # Add suspend/resume support for the i8254.=0A= device pmtimer=0A= =0A= # PCCARD (PCMCIA) support=0A= # PCMCIA and cardbus bridge support=0A= device cbb # cardbus (yenta) bridge=0A= device pccard # PC Card (16-bit) bus=0A= device cardbus # CardBus (32-bit) bus=0A= =0A= # Serial (COM) ports=0A= device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports=0A= =0A= # Parallel port=0A= device ppc=0A= device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required)=0A= device lpt # Printer=0A= device plip # TCP/IP over parallel=0A= device ppi # Parallel port interface device=0A= #device vpo # Requires scbus and da=0A= =0A= # If you've got a "dumb" serial or parallel PCI card that is=0A= # supported by the puc(4) glue driver, uncomment the following=0A= # line to enable it (connects to the sio and/or ppc drivers):=0A= #device puc=0A= =0A= # PCI Ethernet NICs.=0A= device de # DEC/Intel DC21x4x (``Tulip'')=0A= device em # Intel PRO/1000 adapter Gigabit Ethernet Card=0A= device ixgb # Intel PRO/10GbE Ethernet Card=0A= device txp # 3Com 3cR990 (``Typhoon'')=0A= device vx # 3Com 3c590, 3c595 (``Vortex'')=0A= =0A= # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code.=0A= # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these = NICs!=0A= device miibus # MII bus support=0A= device bfe # Broadcom BCM440x 10/100 Ethernet=0A= device bge # Broadcom BCM570xx Gigabit Ethernet=0A= device dc # DEC/Intel 21143 and various workalikes=0A= device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558)=0A= device lge # Level 1 LXT1001 gigabit ethernet=0A= device nge # NatSemi DP83820 gigabit ethernet=0A= device pcn # AMD Am79C97x PCI 10/100 (precedence over 'lnc')=0A= device re # RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S=0A= device rl # RealTek 8129/8139=0A= device sf # Adaptec AIC-6915 (``Starfire'')=0A= device sis # Silicon Integrated Systems SiS 900/SiS 7016=0A= device sk # SysKonnect SK-984x & SK-982x gigabit Ethernet=0A= device ste # Sundance ST201 (D-Link DFE-550TX)=0A= device ti # Alteon Networks Tigon I/II gigabit Ethernet=0A= device tl # Texas Instruments ThunderLAN=0A= device tx # SMC EtherPower II (83c170 ``EPIC'')=0A= device vge # VIA VT612x gigabit ethernet=0A= device vr # VIA Rhine, Rhine II=0A= device wb # Winbond W89C840F=0A= device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'')=0A= =0A= # ISA Ethernet NICs. pccard NICs included.=0A= device cs # Crystal Semiconductor CS89x0 NIC=0A= # 'device ed' requires 'device miibus'=0A= device ed # NE[12]000, SMC Ultra, 3c503, DS8390 cards=0A= device ex # Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 and Pro/10+=0A= device ep # Etherlink III based cards=0A= device fe # Fujitsu MB8696x based cards=0A= device ie # EtherExpress 8/16, 3C507, StarLAN 10 etc.=0A= device lnc # NE2100, NE32-VL Lance Ethernet cards=0A= device sn # SMC's 9000 series of Ethernet chips=0A= device xe # Xircom pccard Ethernet=0A= =0A= # ISA devices that use the old ISA shims=0A= #device le=0A= =0A= # Wireless NIC cards=0A= device wlan # 802.11 support=0A= device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs.=0A= device awi # BayStack 660 and others=0A= device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs.=0A= device ath # Atheros chipset wireless NICs.=0A= #device wl # Older non 802.11 Wavelan wireless NIC.=0A= =0A= # Pseudo devices.=0A= device loop # Network loopback=0A= device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices=0A= device io # I/O device=0A= device random # Entropy device=0A= device ether # Ethernet support=0A= device sl # Kernel SLIP=0A= device ppp # Kernel PPP=0A= device tun # Packet tunnel.=0A= device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc)=0A= device md # Memory "disks"=0A= device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling=0A= device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation)=0A= =0A= # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter.=0A= # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this!=0A= device bpf # Berkeley packet filter=0A= =0A= # USB support=0A= device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface=0A= device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface=0A= device usb # USB Bus (required)=0A= #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices=0A= device ugen # Generic=0A= device uhid # "Human Interface Devices"=0A= device ukbd # Keyboard=0A= device ulpt # Printer=0A= device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da=0A= device ums # Mouse=0A= device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player=0A= device uscanner # Scanners=0A= # USB Ethernet, requires mii=0A= device aue # ADMtek USB Ethernet=0A= device axe # ASIX Electronics USB Ethernet=0A= device cue # CATC USB Ethernet=0A= device kue # Kawasaki LSI USB Ethernet=0A= device rue # RealTek RTL8150 USB Ethernet=0A= =0A= # FireWire support=0A= device firewire # FireWire bus code=0A= device sbp # SCSI over FireWire (Requires scbus and da)=0A= device fwe # Ethernet over FireWire (non-standard!)=0A= =0A= #Additional Options=0A= options IPDIVERT=0A= options IPFIREWALL=0A= options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT=0A= options NETGRAPH=0A= options NETGRAPH_ETHER=0A= options NETGRAPH_PPPOE=0A= options NETGRAPH_SOCKET=0A= =0A= ------=_NextPart_000_0043_01C4BBB0.322E4D70-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 13:21:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E365916A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:21:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32D5143D1D for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:21:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 16483 invoked by uid 513); 26 Oct 2004 13:22:01 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.077334 secs); 26 Oct 2004 13:22:01 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 13:22:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:22:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Samuel Trommel In-Reply-To: <4018.62.45.52.90.1098795470.squirrel@62.45.52.90> Message-ID: <20041026151958.P816@pukruppa.net> References: <20041026141721.X816@pukruppa.net> <4018.62.45.52.90.1098795470.squirrel@62.45.52.90> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:21:59 -0000 On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Hello, > > It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following: > > - show us your /etc/resolv.conf domain pukruppa.de nameserver 195.62.99.42 nameserver 195.62.97.177 > - are you really sure named is configured correctly? No, until now I never had to configure anything there. Uli. > greets, > > Samuel Trommel > > >> >> Hi! >> >> I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed >> something new. >> >> I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. >> Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >>> From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but >> domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). >> >> These are my rc.conf lines: >> >> kern_securelevel_enable="NO" >> inetd_enable="YES" >> gateway_enable="YES" >> named_enable="YES" >> ppp_enable="YES" >> ppp_mode="ddial" >> ppp_nat="YES" >> ppp_profile="my-profile" >> >> >> Thanks for any hints, >> >> Uli. >> >> >> +---------------------------+ >> | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >> | Wuppertal | >> | Germany | >> +---------------------------+ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 13:32:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BAE16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:32:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maquis.kabelfoon.nl (maquis.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.52.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F3A43D1F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:32:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from s.trommel@helpdesk.kabelfoon.nl) Received: from kabfoon.kabelfoon.intern (kabfoon.office.kabelfoon.intern [192.168.12.252]) by maquis.kabelfoon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0813D2F9E7; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:32:29 +0200 (CEST) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:30:24 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ppp -nat broken??? Thread-Index: AcS7XnyZd+QrEHvfR7u9VcNl67+ORAAAE7mA From: "Samuel Trommel" To: "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" , "Samuel Trommel" cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:32:30 -0000 Hello Peter, Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all. And in the = case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf. So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off? You really need to give us some more information.. Samuel Trommel -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22 Aan: Samuel Trommel CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken??? On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Hello, > > It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following: > > - show us your /etc/resolv.conf domain pukruppa.de nameserver 195.62.99.42 nameserver 195.62.97.177 > - are you really sure named is configured correctly? No, until now I never had to configure anything there. Uli. > greets, > > Samuel Trommel > > >> >> Hi! >> >> I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed >> something new. >> >> I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. >> Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >>> From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but >> domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). >> >> These are my rc.conf lines: >> >> kern_securelevel_enable=3D"NO" >> inetd_enable=3D"YES" >> gateway_enable=3D"YES" >> named_enable=3D"YES" >> ppp_enable=3D"YES" >> ppp_mode=3D"ddial" >> ppp_nat=3D"YES" >> ppp_profile=3D"my-profile" >> >> >> Thanks for any hints, >> >> Uli. >> >> >> +---------------------------+ >> | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >> | Wuppertal | >> | Germany | >> +---------------------------+ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ -- Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij.=20 Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 13:41:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E758916A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:41:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from home.irrelevant.org (dsl-217-155-238-246.zen.co.uk [217.155.238.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EE543D1D for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:41:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simond@irrelevant.org) Received: from telivo.cust.hastwood.com ([62.244.179.195] helo=[192.168.195.58]) by home.irrelevant.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CMRZw-000CDg-W0; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:41:40 +0100 From: Simon Dick To: Talbot Neil In-Reply-To: <004701c4bb5c$60ddf200$6401a8c0@ctsinc.com.au> References: <004701c4bb5c$60ddf200$6401a8c0@ctsinc.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1098798075.661.33.camel@laptop.irrelevant.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:41:15 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-4.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description --------------------------------------------------1% [score: 0.0000] 0.3 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Atheros Wireless Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:41:43 -0000 On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:04, Talbot Neil wrote: > Hi All, > > I am having troubles compiling the atheros card into the kernel. > I am getting compilation errors as follows: Try adding: device ath_hal to your kernel config file From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 14:10:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC43316A4DD for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:10:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-03.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9239543D1D for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:10:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from talbotn@ihug.com.au) Received: (qmail 26622 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2004 14:10:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caroline) (203.206.233.169) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 14:10:25 -0000 Message-ID: <005301c4bb65$87386e90$6401a8c0@ctsinc.com.au> From: "Talbot Neil" To: "Simon Dick" References: <004701c4bb5c$60ddf200$6401a8c0@ctsinc.com.au> <1098798075.661.33.camel@laptop.irrelevant.org> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:10:20 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Atheros Wireless Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:10:28 -0000 yep that fixed it thanks.. Stupid me Talbot ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Dick" To: "Talbot Neil" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:41 PM Subject: Re: Atheros Wireless Card > On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:04, Talbot Neil wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am having troubles compiling the atheros card into the kernel. > > I am getting compilation errors as follows: > > Try adding: > device ath_hal > to your kernel config file > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 14:53:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC2D16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:53:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx01.uunet.co.za (mx01.uunet.co.za [196.31.48.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E06143D2D for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:53:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gareth@uunet.co.za) Received: from [196.30.72.11] (helo=pixproxy.so.cpt1.za.uu.net) by mx01.uunet.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1CMShW-0004Gf-Nl for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:53:30 +0200 Received: from LAP-GARETHH.staff.uunet.co.za (nop193.nop.cpt1.za.uu.net [196.30.72.193]) by pixproxy.so.cpt1.za.uu.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417241B59F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:53:30 +0200 (SAST) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:51:28 +0200 (South Africa Standard Time) From: Gareth Hopkins To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Cell: +27 82 929 6668 X-X-Sender: gareth@hill.noc.uunet.co.za MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned By ClamAV Subject: Future support for PERC 4e/XX cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:53:32 -0000 Howdie, Was wondering if the following cards would be supported in the near future by BSD 4.10. PERC 4e/Si and PERC 4e/Di. These are from the new Dell poweredge 1850 and 2850 servers. --- Gareth Hopkins System Operations UUNET ZA From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 15:18:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647DC16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:18:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from exchange.mainemutual.com (exchange.mainemutual.com [208.5.182.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8FE43D31 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:18:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willie.winslow@mainemutual.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:18:22 -0400 Message-ID: <0C32636D8A9C244390214BA6AEA3B65003BEBAE6@exchange.mainemutual> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Change IP address Thread-Index: AcS7bwgrn2SO2fPiSb67z9HmR/XNxQ== From: "Willie Winslow" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Change IP address X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:18:24 -0000 I need to change the IP address of my FreeBSD box, it is also our Name Server. =20 I am aware that I need to change the following; /etc/rc.conf /etc/resolv.conf /etc/namedb/mydomain.com Is there anything else that needs to be changed? Thanks, Willie Winslow Senior Systems Engineer Maine Mutual Group Direct Line: 877.266.3815 Direct Fax: 207.760.1012 =20 mailto: willie.winslow@mainemutual.com Visit our website at http://www.mainemutual.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 15:19:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C534F16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:19:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A49EF43D39 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:19:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 19850 invoked by uid 513); 26 Oct 2004 15:19:17 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.131243 secs); 26 Oct 2004 15:19:17 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 15:19:16 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:20:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Samuel Trommel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20041026160915.R816@pukruppa.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1642063748-1098804024=:816" cc: Samuel Trommel cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:19:15 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1642063748-1098804024=:816 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Hello Peter, > > Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all.=20 Windows-IP-Konfiguration =09Hostname=09=09=09=09: tiny =09Prim=E4res DNS-Suffix=09=09=09: =09Knotentyp=09=09=09=09: Hybrid =09IP-Routing aktiviert=09=09=09: Nein =09WINS-Proxy aktiviert=09=09=09: Nein Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung =09Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix=09: =09Beschreibung=09=09=09=09: 00-80-88-03-C4- =09=09=09=09=09=09=093A =09DHCP aktiviert=09=09=09=09: Nein =09IP-Adresse=09=09=09=09: 192.168.10.4 Subnetzmaske=09=09=09=09: 255.255.255.0 Standardgateway=09=09=09=09: 192.168.10.1 =09DNS-Server=09=09=09=09: 192.168.10.1 =09prim=E4rer WINS-Server=09=09=09: 192.168.10.1 > And in the case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf. nameserver 192.168.10.1 > > So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off? Doesn't work either. > Samuel Trommel > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] > Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22 > Aan: Samuel Trommel > CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken??? > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following: >> >> - show us your /etc/resolv.conf > domain=09pukruppa.de > nameserver 195.62.99.42 > nameserver 195.62.97.177 > > >> - are you really sure named is configured correctly? > No, until now I never had to configure anything there. > > > Uli. > >> greets, >> >> Samuel Trommel >> >> >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed >>> something new. >>> >>> I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. >>> Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >>>> From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but >>> domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). >>> >>> These are my rc.conf lines: >>> >>> kern_securelevel_enable=3D"NO" >>> inetd_enable=3D"YES" >>> gateway_enable=3D"YES" >>> named_enable=3D"YES" >>> ppp_enable=3D"YES" >>> ppp_mode=3D"ddial" >>> ppp_nat=3D"YES" >>> ppp_profile=3D"my-profile" >>> >>> >>> Thanks for any hints, >>> >>> Uli. >>> >>> >>> =09+---------------------------+ >>> =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >>> | Wuppertal | >>> | Germany | >>> +---------------------------+ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >> > > =09+---------------------------+ > =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | > | Wuppertal | > | Germany | > +---------------------------+ > -- > Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. > Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > =09+---------------------------+ =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ --0-1642063748-1098804024=:816-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 15:30:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9C916A4D1 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:30:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rift.creativeimage.ca (rift.creativeimage.ca [66.207.220.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BC243D1D for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:30:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obaum@uponline.com) Received: from CIClaptop (S01060004ac903c37.vc.shawcable.net [24.86.193.209]) by rift.creativeimage.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i9QFUE491722 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:30:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from obaum@uponline.com) Message-ID: <001001c4bb70$a3a88c80$6800a8c0@CIClaptop> From: "Oren Baum" To: References: <20041026120319.1B51916A4CE@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:29:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2741.2600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2742.200 Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 84, Issue 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:30:24 -0000 > Subject: Dell CERC SATA RAID controller Hi, We just finished configuring 2 Dell PowerEdge 700 series with the DELL CERC SATA controller. No problems on 4.10, used aac, recognized automatically. Ended up being the easiest part of the whole installation. Good Luck! Oren Baum UpOnline eMarketing From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 15:32:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC6716A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:32:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtps-out1.xs4all.nl (smtps-out1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4AF43D3F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:32:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mhellwig@xs4all.nl) Received: from [10.0.0.185] (xinagnet.xs4all.nl [80.126.243.229]) (authenticated bits=0)i9QFWZRF033231; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:32:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <417E6E14.9010305@xs4all.nl> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:32:36 +0200 From: "Martin P. Hellwig" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041002 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Willie Winslow References: <0C32636D8A9C244390214BA6AEA3B65003BEBAE6@exchange.mainemutual> In-Reply-To: <0C32636D8A9C244390214BA6AEA3B65003BEBAE6@exchange.mainemutual> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Change IP address X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:32:38 -0000 Willie Winslow wrote: >I need to change the IP address of my FreeBSD box, it is also our Name >Server. > >I am aware that I need to change the following; >/etc/rc.conf >/etc/resolv.conf >/etc/namedb/mydomain.com > >Is there anything else that needs to be changed? > > > Perhaps /etc/hosts, but that depends on your configuration. -- mph From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 15:37:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3CE16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:37:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.borderware.com (mail.borderware.com [207.236.65.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82E643D39 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmills@borderware.com) Message-ID: <417E6F2A.9020508@borderware.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:37:14 -0400 From: clarence User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 3ware raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:37:17 -0000 Hello I was wandering if anybody out there has had any success using 3ware 7506-8 cards with Freebsd 4.10. I was previously using a Promise controller SX6000, and was having problems with this card. Thanks From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 15:37:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2B716A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:37:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maquis.kabelfoon.nl (maquis.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.52.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0CB43D46 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:37:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from s.trommel@helpdesk.kabelfoon.nl) Received: from kabfoon.kabelfoon.intern (kabfoon.office.kabelfoon.intern [192.168.12.252]) by maquis.kabelfoon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562B02F9E7; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:37:50 +0200 (CEST) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:35:46 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ppp -nat broken??? Thread-Index: AcS7bt5kzhhQeWH/RmuFDXPsF0Ol/AAAJ+Rg From: "Samuel Trommel" To: "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" cc: Samuel Trommel cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:37:52 -0000 Oke.. are you using DHCP or static. I suppose you are using dhcp?? So i = will give you a example of my dhcpd.conf: option domain-name "sam.intern"; option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.2, 192.168.0.1; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.240; option broadcast-address 192.168.0.15; default-lease-time 600; max-lease-time 7200; authoritative; ddns-update-style none; log-facility local7; Look at these "option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.2, 192.168.0.1;" = this are the dns-server my clients get when they ask for a dhcp-lease. = You should check if your dns-servers has something like: forwarders { 195.62.99.42; 195.62.97.177; }; If i'm not right. Give us some more information about your setup.. i'm = just guessing around now.. greets, Samuel Trommel Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:20 Aan: Samuel Trommel CC: Samuel Trommel; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken??? On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Hello Peter, > > Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all.=20 Windows-IP-Konfiguration Hostname : tiny Prim=E4res DNS-Suffix : Knotentyp : Hybrid IP-Routing aktiviert : Nein WINS-Proxy aktiviert : Nein Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix : Beschreibung : 00-80-88-03-C4- 3A DHCP aktiviert : Nein IP-Adresse : 192.168.10.4 Subnetzmaske : 255.255.255.0 Standardgateway : 192.168.10.1 DNS-Server : 192.168.10.1 prim=E4rer WINS-Server : 192.168.10.1 > And in the case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf. nameserver 192.168.10.1 > > So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off? Doesn't work either. > Samuel Trommel > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] > Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22 > Aan: Samuel Trommel > CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken??? > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following: >> >> - show us your /etc/resolv.conf > domain pukruppa.de > nameserver 195.62.99.42 > nameserver 195.62.97.177 > > >> - are you really sure named is configured correctly? > No, until now I never had to configure anything there. > > > Uli. > >> greets, >> >> Samuel Trommel >> >> >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed >>> something new. >>> >>> I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. >>> Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >>>> From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but >>> domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). >>> >>> These are my rc.conf lines: >>> >>> kern_securelevel_enable=3D"NO" >>> inetd_enable=3D"YES" >>> gateway_enable=3D"YES" >>> named_enable=3D"YES" >>> ppp_enable=3D"YES" >>> ppp_mode=3D"ddial" >>> ppp_nat=3D"YES" >>> ppp_profile=3D"my-profile" >>> >>> >>> Thanks for any hints, >>> >>> Uli. >>> >>> >>> +---------------------------+ >>> | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >>> | Wuppertal | >>> | Germany | >>> +---------------------------+ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > +---------------------------+ > | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | > | Wuppertal | > | Germany | > +---------------------------+ > -- > Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. > Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ -- Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij.=20 Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 15:53:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D5216A4D0 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:53:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7852C43D39 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:53:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 16248 invoked by uid 513); 26 Oct 2004 15:53:52 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.07608 secs); 26 Oct 2004 15:53:52 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 15:53:51 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:55:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Samuel Trommel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20041026175003.A2066@pukruppa.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-199316150-1098806110=:2066" cc: Samuel Trommel cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:53:49 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-199316150-1098806110=:2066 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Oke.. are you using DHCP or static. No, I am using static. > If i'm not right. Give us some more information about your=20 > setup.. i'm just guessing around now.. Really sorry about this, I set this up long ago and never thought=20 about it again. Uli. > > greets, > > Samuel Trommel > > Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] > Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:20 > Aan: Samuel Trommel > CC: Samuel Trommel; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken??? > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > >> Hello Peter, >> >> Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all. > Windows-IP-Konfiguration > > =09Hostname=09=09=09=09: tiny > =09Prim=E4res DNS-Suffix=09=09=09: > =09Knotentyp=09=09=09=09: Hybrid > =09IP-Routing aktiviert=09=09=09: Nein > =09WINS-Proxy aktiviert=09=09=09: Nein > > Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung > > =09Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix=09: > =09Beschreibung=09=09=09=09: 00-80-88-03-C4- > =09=09=09=09=09=09=093A > =09DHCP aktiviert=09=09=09=09: Nein > =09IP-Adresse=09=09=09=09: 192.168.10.4 > Subnetzmaske=09=09=09=09: 255.255.255.0 > Standardgateway=09=09=09=09: 192.168.10.1 > =09DNS-Server=09=09=09=09: 192.168.10.1 > =09prim=E4rer WINS-Server=09=09=09: 192.168.10.1 > > >> And in the case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf. > > nameserver 192.168.10.1 > >> >> So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off? > Doesn't work either. > > > > > >> Samuel Trommel >> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] >> Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22 >> Aan: Samuel Trommel >> CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >> Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken??? >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following: >>> >>> - show us your /etc/resolv.conf >> domain=09pukruppa.de >> nameserver 195.62.99.42 >> nameserver 195.62.97.177 >> >> >>> - are you really sure named is configured correctly? >> No, until now I never had to configure anything there. >> >> >> Uli. >> >>> greets, >>> >>> Samuel Trommel >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed >>>> something new. >>>> >>>> I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. >>>> Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >>>>> From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but >>>> domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). >>>> >>>> These are my rc.conf lines: >>>> >>>> kern_securelevel_enable=3D"NO" >>>> inetd_enable=3D"YES" >>>> gateway_enable=3D"YES" >>>> named_enable=3D"YES" >>>> ppp_enable=3D"YES" >>>> ppp_mode=3D"ddial" >>>> ppp_nat=3D"YES" >>>> ppp_profile=3D"my-profile" >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for any hints, >>>> >>>> Uli. >>>> >>>> >>>> =09+---------------------------+ >>>> =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >>>> | Wuppertal | >>>> | Germany | >>>> +---------------------------+ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >>> >> >> =09+---------------------------+ >> =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >> | Wuppertal | >> | Germany | >> +---------------------------+ >> -- >> Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. >> Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >> >> > > =09+---------------------------+ > =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | > | Wuppertal | > | Germany | > +---------------------------+ > -- > Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. > Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ > > =09+---------------------------+ =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ --0-199316150-1098806110=:2066-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 16:43:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CE716A4CF for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:43:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd.org.cn (dns3.freebsd.org.cn [61.129.66.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 012E643D41 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:43:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphij@frontfree.net) Received: (qmail 37317 invoked by uid 0); 26 Oct 2004 16:38:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO beastie.frontfree.net) (219.239.98.7) by mail.freebsd.org.cn with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 16:38:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D333A13468F; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:43:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beastie.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00652-03; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:43:08 +0800 (CST) Received: by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4B22B1345FD; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:43:04 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:43:04 +0800 From: Xin LI To: Willie Winslow Message-ID: <20041026164304.GB2172@frontfree.net> References: <0C32636D8A9C244390214BA6AEA3B65003BEBAE6@exchange.mainemutual> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0C32636D8A9C244390214BA6AEA3B65003BEBAE6@exchange.mainemutual> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-key-ID/Fingerprint: 0xCAEEB8C0 / 43B8 B703 B8DD 0231 B333 DC28 39FB 93A0 CAEE B8C0 X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc X-Operating-System: FreeBSD beastie.frontfree.net 5.3-delphij FreeBSD 5.3-delphij #11: Tue Oct 26 14:12:03 CST 2004 delphij@beastie.frontfree.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEASTIE i386 X-URL: http://www.delphij.net X-By: delphij@beastie.frontfree.net X-Location: Beijing, China X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frontfree.net cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Change IP address X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:43:22 -0000 --QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:18:22AM -0400, Willie Winslow wrote: > I need to change the IP address of my FreeBSD box, it is also our Name > Server. =20 >=20 > I am aware that I need to change the following; > /etc/rc.conf > /etc/resolv.conf > /etc/namedb/mydomain.com Maybe /etc/hosts, which contains your locally specified IP-name pairs. You may also want to adjust your reverse-resolve domain files under /etc/namedb. I suggest that you do a ``grep -R [your IP] /'' to make sure there is nothing left off. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ See complete headers for GPG key and other information. --QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBfn6Y/cVsHxFZiIoRArT4AJ9hfkx2Ncl3X0xMOEyDDL9SC0sbYACaAssw +3XwfLQErBk4rH5Ie0hksn4= =s7WJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 17:44:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629C516A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:44:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from apollo.orakel.ntnu.no (apollo.orakel.ntnu.no [129.241.186.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41E6843D45 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:44:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oyvinht@orakel.ntnu.no) Received: (qmail 18246 invoked by uid 1019); 26 Oct 2004 17:44:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:44:02 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8yvin?= Halfdan Thuv To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041026174402.GB17680@orakel.ntnu.no> References: <20041025162952.GA1974@Delorien> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20041025162952.GA1974@Delorien> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on apollo.orakel.ntnu.no X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: Dell CERC SATA RAID controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: oyvinht@orakel.ntnu.no List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:44:07 -0000 > hi all > > A client is buying some Dell Power Edge 700 servers. > Looking at the caratteristics of the producer, > it has a CERC SATA RAID 6 channel. > > From the Freebsd compatibility list i can see > that the driver i could use is aac(4) for > CERC SATA RAID 2 > > Can i use aac driver for the CERC SATA RAID 6 channel > controller? > > I must install Freebsd 4.10 and 5.3 Hi, no one seem to have answered this (at least not to the list). Therefore I thought that I at least could tell you that I set up a PE750 for a client some months ago. The server uses a CERC SATA RAID 2, and is working very well (fast & stable). I tested things like hotplugging and booting of a stripe and it worked as expected. The server is using 4.10 (5.2.1 didn't work with the card, 5.3 (very!)probably does). I really wouldn't run 5.x for production use anyway. I would persume that the aac driver would work for a 6 channel card as well, as the channels are abstracted away from the OS point-of-view. -- Regards, | An ideal world is left Øyvin Halfdan Thuv | as an excercise to the reader. | [Paul Graham, OnLisp 8.1] From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 17:49:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA5516A4FC; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:49:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F8A43D4C; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:49:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9QHoZBZ083065; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:50:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <417E8DC3.6080703@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:47:47 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org Subject: Plan for 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:49:34 -0000 All, Today was supposed to be the release day for 5.3, but some serious show-stoppers came to light yesterday. Since the purpose of 5.3 is to have a functionally stable release that is suitable for migrating to, we decided to hold up 5.3 until these issues are fixed. The first issue deals with TCP SACK problems that result in a livelocked system. The second involves GDB leaving threaded processes in an unkillable state. Fixes for both are under review and will be committed to RELENG_5 in a few days when preliminary testing is complete. I've also turned off ULE to help narrow down many of the ambiguous problems that are still being reported. ULE works fine for some, but it must be eliminated from the environment when you suspect a bug. I expect to keep ULE off in 5.x until the rate of other problem reports and decreased and someone takes an active interest in it. Please continue to test RC1. At this point I'm not going to promise a particular date for 5.3-RELEASE, but I would expect it in the next 7-10 days assuming nothing else significant comes up. Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 19:05:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAE016A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:05:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maquis.kabelfoon.nl (maquis.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.52.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B524143D1F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:05:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from s.trommel@helpdesk.kabelfoon.nl) Received: from kabfoon.kabelfoon.intern (kabfoon.office.kabelfoon.intern [192.168.12.252]) by maquis.kabelfoon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D283F2F9FB; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:05:19 +0200 (CEST) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:03:15 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ppp -nat broken??? Thread-Index: AcS7c7ie3snWqJK/S/i2Dqz4tO6RYAAAEW1g From: "Samuel Trommel" To: "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" cc: Samuel Trommel cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:05:21 -0000 Just set named=3D"NO" instead of "YES" reboot you server and(rc.conf). = Change the DNS-Server of you clients in: Primary nameserver 195.62.99.42 Secundary nameserver 195.62.97.177 greets, Samuel Trommel -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:55 Aan: Samuel Trommel CC: Samuel Trommel; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken??? On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Oke.. are you using DHCP or static. No, I am using static. > If i'm not right. Give us some more information about your=20 > setup.. i'm just guessing around now.. Really sorry about this, I set this up long ago and never thought=20 about it again. Uli. > > greets, > > Samuel Trommel > > Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] > Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:20 > Aan: Samuel Trommel > CC: Samuel Trommel; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken??? > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > >> Hello Peter, >> >> Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all. > Windows-IP-Konfiguration > > Hostname : tiny > Prim=E4res DNS-Suffix : > Knotentyp : Hybrid > IP-Routing aktiviert : Nein > WINS-Proxy aktiviert : Nein > > Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung > > Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix : > Beschreibung : 00-80-88-03-C4- > 3A > DHCP aktiviert : Nein > IP-Adresse : 192.168.10.4 > Subnetzmaske : 255.255.255.0 > Standardgateway : 192.168.10.1 > DNS-Server : 192.168.10.1 > prim=E4rer WINS-Server : 192.168.10.1 > > >> And in the case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf. > > nameserver 192.168.10.1 > >> >> So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off? > Doesn't work either. > > > > > >> Samuel Trommel >> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] >> Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22 >> Aan: Samuel Trommel >> CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >> Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken??? >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following: >>> >>> - show us your /etc/resolv.conf >> domain pukruppa.de >> nameserver 195.62.99.42 >> nameserver 195.62.97.177 >> >> >>> - are you really sure named is configured correctly? >> No, until now I never had to configure anything there. >> >> >> Uli. >> >>> greets, >>> >>> Samuel Trommel >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed >>>> something new. >>>> >>>> I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. >>>> Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >>>>> From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but >>>> domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). >>>> >>>> These are my rc.conf lines: >>>> >>>> kern_securelevel_enable=3D"NO" >>>> inetd_enable=3D"YES" >>>> gateway_enable=3D"YES" >>>> named_enable=3D"YES" >>>> ppp_enable=3D"YES" >>>> ppp_mode=3D"ddial" >>>> ppp_nat=3D"YES" >>>> ppp_profile=3D"my-profile" >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for any hints, >>>> >>>> Uli. >>>> >>>> >>>> +---------------------------+ >>>> | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >>>> | Wuppertal | >>>> | Germany | >>>> +---------------------------+ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> +---------------------------+ >> | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >> | Wuppertal | >> | Germany | >> +---------------------------+ >> -- >> Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. >> Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > +---------------------------+ > | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | > | Wuppertal | > | Germany | > +---------------------------+ > -- > Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. > Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ > > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ -- Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij.=20 Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 20:28:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9146E16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:28:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.bitfreak.org (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA2243D5F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:28:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmp@bitfreak.org) Received: by mail.bitfreak.org (Postfix, from userid 10800) id DF08D19F2D; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 209.152.53.188 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dmp); by webmail.bitfreak.org with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1127.209.152.53.188.1098822627.squirrel@209.152.53.188> In-Reply-To: <417E6F2A.9020508@borderware.com> References: <417E6F2A.9020508@borderware.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:30:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Darren Pilgrim" To: "clarence" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:28:52 -0000 > Hello > > I was wandering if anybody out there has had any success using 3ware > 7506-8 cards with Freebsd 4.10. I was previously using a Promise > controller SX6000, and was having problems with this card. This is something of a FAQ. There's a long list of people using 3ware 6/7/8xxx series cards in FreeBSD 4.x boxes with great success. AFAIK that extends to 5.x as well. The Promise ATA RAID cards just plain suck, IMO. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 20:42:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F56D16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:42:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D829643D45 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:42:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9QKgNS4018723; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:42:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200410262042.i9QKgNS4018723@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:42:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: fbsdlist@merdin.com In-Reply-To: <1076237332.20040827215245@kaluga.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ffs_alloc panic patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:42:31 -0000 On 27 Aug, Pavel Merdine wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to propose the following patch: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- ffs_alloc.c.orig Fri May 14 19:03:50 2004 > +++ ffs_alloc.c Sat Aug 7 03:36:32 2004 > @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ > minbfree = 1; > cgsize = fs->fs_fsize * fs->fs_fpg; > dirsize = fs->fs_avgfilesize * fs->fs_avgfpdir; > - curdirsize = avgndir ? (cgsize - avgbfree * fs->fs_bsize) / avgndir : 0; > + curdirsize = avgndir ? (cgsize - avgbfree * fs->fs_bsize) / avgndir : 512; > if (dirsize < curdirsize) > dirsize = curdirsize; > maxcontigdirs = min((avgbfree * fs->fs_bsize) / dirsize, 255); > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > It should solve the problem of "panic: integer divide fault" on the > last line of the code above. The panic happens on: > 1. directory creation > 2. when disk is empty > 3. when avg_dir_size avg_file_size are set to values, so > avg_dir_size * avg_file_size is negative in integer. > example: avg_dir_size = 8000, avf_file_size = 375000. > (curdirsize == 0 and dirsize < 0, so dirsize = 0) I'd prefer to cap dirsize at cgsize in this case. Even without the panic, I think you'll find the performance of the file system in this case will be terrible. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 21:04:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3644516A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:04:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avscan2.sentex.ca (avscan2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB1243D1F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:04:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.sentex.ca [127.0.0.1]) by avscan2.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9QL4020003884; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:04:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from avscan2.sentex.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (avscan2.sentex.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03690-03; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:04:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by avscan2.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9QL40hj003861; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:04:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9QL3q2F096679; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:03:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.0.20041026165755.03ab35f0@64.7.153.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@64.7.153.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:10:10 -0400 To: cmills@borderware.com From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <1127.209.152.53.188.1098822627.squirrel@209.152.53.188> References: <417E6F2A.9020508@borderware.com> <1127.209.152.53.188.1098822627.squirrel@209.152.53.188> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at avscan2b cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:04:03 -0000 At 04:30 PM 26/10/2004, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > > Hello > > > > I was wandering if anybody out there has had any success using 3ware > > 7506-8 cards with Freebsd 4.10. I was previously using a Promise > > controller SX6000, and was having problems with this card. > >This is something of a FAQ. > >There's a long list of people using 3ware 6/7/8xxx series cards in FreeBSD >4.x boxes with great success. AFAIK that extends to 5.x as well. Yes, I am one who always seems to pipe up. I use this very card specifically on a busy pop3/imap server. The mail spool is made up of 4 drives in RAID10 and 2 other ports are used for the base OS in RAID1. Its been in service in this config for over a year without issue. When it comes time to replace bad drives, all has worked as expected for us. We dont use hot swap trays (dont really trust the electrical design of many of them), so we do it while powered down. Literally, shutdown, pull the bad drive, put in the new, go into the BIOS (or you can use the cmd line tools), add the new drive to the RAID set, exit out and let it boot and thats it. The controller rebuilds in the background and notifies you when done. There were at some point a bad batch of 7000 series cards that needed to be RMA'd (perhaps 2+ yrs ago now ?). But other than that one time hardware issue, they work great on all the platforms we have (i386 on FreeBSD, Linux, Win2k). We also use most of the other cards, except for the 9xxx series which we have no experience with yet. ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 21:12:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF2416A4D4 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.borderware.com (mail.borderware.com [207.236.65.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C52343D2F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:12:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmills@borderware.com) Message-ID: <417EBDAA.3070704@borderware.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:12:10 -0400 From: clarence User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: <417E6F2A.9020508@borderware.com> <1127.209.152.53.188.1098822627.squirrel@209.152.53.188> <6.1.2.0.0.20041026165755.03ab35f0@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20041026165755.03ab35f0@64.7.153.2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:12:12 -0000 Thank you all for your comments. I have used Promise controllers in the past TX4000 without incidence, so I assumed this SX6000 would work flawlessly. You guys have convinced me that 3ware is the way to go. Thank you for your quick responses Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 04:30 PM 26/10/2004, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > >> > Hello >> > >> > I was wandering if anybody out there has had any success using 3ware >> > 7506-8 cards with Freebsd 4.10. I was previously using a Promise >> > controller SX6000, and was having problems with this card. >> >> This is something of a FAQ. >> >> There's a long list of people using 3ware 6/7/8xxx series cards in >> FreeBSD >> 4.x boxes with great success. AFAIK that extends to 5.x as well. > > > Yes, I am one who always seems to pipe up. I use this very card > specifically on a busy pop3/imap server. The mail spool is made up of > 4 drives in RAID10 and 2 other ports are used for the base OS in > RAID1. Its been in service in this config for over a year without issue. > > When it comes time to replace bad drives, all has worked as expected > for us. We dont use hot swap trays (dont really trust the electrical > design of many of them), so we do it while powered down. Literally, > shutdown, pull the bad drive, put in the new, go into the BIOS (or you > can use the cmd line tools), add the new drive to the RAID set, exit > out and let it boot and thats it. The controller rebuilds in the > background and notifies you when done. > > There were at some point a bad batch of 7000 series cards that needed > to be RMA'd (perhaps 2+ yrs ago now ?). But other than that one time > hardware issue, they work great on all the platforms we have (i386 on > FreeBSD, Linux, Win2k). > > We also use most of the other cards, except for the 9xxx series which > we have no experience with yet. > > ---Mike > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 21:34:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAF316A4CF for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:34:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.faerunconsulting.com (vadsl-pppoe-jcnj-cst-216-182-31-61.tellurian.net [216.182.31.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D7F943D1F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:34:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@carrollkong.com) Received: (qmail 21019 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2004 21:34:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO athena) (192.168.0.2) by dmz.faerunhome.com with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 21:34:38 -0000 Message-ID: <0ade01c4bba3$986c1520$0200a8c0@athena> From: "Carroll Kong" To: References: <417E6F2A.9020508@borderware.com> <1127.209.152.53.188.1098822627.squirrel@209.152.53.188> <6.1.2.0.0.20041026165755.03ab35f0@64.7.153.2> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:34:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4942.400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4942.400 Subject: Re: 3ware raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:34:40 -0000 Interesting. I have 3 3Ware 7xxxs. (2 7500-4LP, 1 7450) The 7450 one on a busy server is experiencing some pretty nasty problems. You can google for the thread with this subject. 3ware 7506, FreeBSD 4.x, Maxtor Disks & SMART Problem So far, once we backed off on the I/O load and as a result, the system has been running solid. I have not fully identified the problem, but I here is a list of things to watch out for 1) Do not use "hot swap"/"cold swap" systems. I agree with Mike now, and I believe I am paying the price for using a cold swap system. We plan on replacing the IDE backplane in hopes that it will resolve the issue. I am guessing nice swap systems are reserved for SCSI SCA for now. 2) Avoid using riser cards if you can. 3Ware claims to have fixed their issues, but put up the usual "cover your [butt]" disclaimers. Better safe than sorry, avoid using a riser card if you can. 3) Avoid using Maxtor disks with it. Yes, I know a lot of people have it working fine. Heck, my 2 7500-4LPs are working fine with Maxtors throughout. (2 in RAID1 under Win2k, 4 in RAID10 under FreeBSD 4.X) But, if you have a choice why risk it? 4) Monitor the system carefully. Apparently in DEGRADED mode, the system has a high chance of complete lockups if left unattended. It is important to note that the 3Ware controller is very sensitive. People have gone into DEGRADED mode randomly because of slight power drops or "bad" IDE cabling. Of course, your mileage may vary. I will let you know if the backplane swap out fixes everything. For now, we want to enjoy some real uptime and hold off on the upgrade as long as we can. - Carroll Kong ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Tancsa" To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:10 PM Subject: Re: 3ware raid > At 04:30 PM 26/10/2004, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > I was wandering if anybody out there has had any success using 3ware > > > 7506-8 cards with Freebsd 4.10. I was previously using a Promise > > > controller SX6000, and was having problems with this card. > > > >This is something of a FAQ. > > > >There's a long list of people using 3ware 6/7/8xxx series cards in FreeBSD > >4.x boxes with great success. AFAIK that extends to 5.x as well. > > Yes, I am one who always seems to pipe up. I use this very card > specifically on a busy pop3/imap server. The mail spool is made up of 4 > drives in RAID10 and 2 other ports are used for the base OS in RAID1. Its > been in service in this config for over a year without issue. > > When it comes time to replace bad drives, all has worked as expected for > us. We dont use hot swap trays (dont really trust the electrical design of > many of them), so we do it while powered down. Literally, shutdown, pull > the bad drive, put in the new, go into the BIOS (or you can use the cmd > line tools), add the new drive to the RAID set, exit out and let it boot > and thats it. The controller rebuilds in the background and notifies you > when done. > > There were at some point a bad batch of 7000 series cards that needed to be > RMA'd (perhaps 2+ yrs ago now ?). But other than that one time hardware > issue, they work great on all the platforms we have (i386 on FreeBSD, > Linux, Win2k). > > We also use most of the other cards, except for the 9xxx series which we > have no experience with yet. > > ---Mike > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 21:35:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF0B16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:35:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mandarin.fruitsalad.org (pc117.net160.koping.net [81.16.160.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593B243D3F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:35:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@fruitsalad.org) Received: from [192.168.15.6] (helo=fmd.universe.hasta.se) by mandarin.fruitsalad.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1CMYye-0002rY-5l; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:35:36 +0200 From: Matt Douhan Organization: fruitsalad.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:34:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.50 References: <417E6F2A.9020508@borderware.com> <1127.209.152.53.188.1098822627.squirrel@209.152.53.188> <6.1.2.0.0.20041026165755.03ab35f0@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20041026165755.03ab35f0@64.7.153.2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410262334.15378.matt@fruitsalad.org> cc: cmills@borderware.com Subject: Re: 3ware raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:35:43 -0000 On Tue October 26 2004 23.10, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > We also use most of the other cards, except for the 9xxx series which we > have no experience with yet. We use the 9xxx series SATA on our CVS/FTP servers and they are extremely nice to work with, and dead fast, surprisingly fast actually, and replace failed drives we do while powerd doen for safety, and it has not failed on us yet on the 9xxx cards rgds Matt -- Matt Douhan http://www.fruitsalad.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 22:27:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEB616A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:27:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07BE43D55 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:27:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF67C12AE5A; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:27:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71052-05; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:27:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-46-91.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.91]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E67512A074; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:27:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6D7848771; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:27:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B19486F6; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:27:30 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:27:30 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Carroll Kong In-Reply-To: <0ade01c4bba3$986c1520$0200a8c0@athena> Message-ID: <20041026192648.Q39377@ganymede.hub.org> References: <417E6F2A.9020508@borderware.com> <1127.209.152.53.188.1098822627.squirrel@209.152.53.188> <0ade01c4bba3$986c1520$0200a8c0@athena> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:27:33 -0000 On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Carroll Kong wrote: > 4) Monitor the system carefully. Apparently in DEGRADED mode, the > system has a high chance of complete lockups if left unattended. It is > important to note that the 3Ware controller is very sensitive. People > have gone into DEGRADED mode randomly because of slight power drops or > "bad" IDE cabling. How do you test (and fix) something like this? revive the drive and hope the same drive doesn't happen again? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 22:40:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C674B16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:40:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.faerunconsulting.com (vadsl-pppoe-jcnj-cst-216-182-31-61.tellurian.net [216.182.31.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11A7243D60 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:40:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@carrollkong.com) Received: (qmail 26850 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2004 22:40:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO athena) (192.168.0.2) by dmz.faerunhome.com with SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 22:40:32 -0000 Message-ID: <0b4301c4bbac$cd3e07a0$0200a8c0@athena> From: "Carroll Kong" To: References: <417E6F2A.9020508@borderware.com> <1127.209.152.53.188.1098822627.squirrel@209.152.53.188> <6.1.2.0.0.20041026165755.03ab35f0@64.7.153.2> <0ade01c4bba3$986c1520$0200a8c0@athena> <20041026192648.Q39377@ganymede.hub.org> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:40:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4942.400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4942.400 Subject: Re: 3ware raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:40:34 -0000 Well, in the normal cases (where the disk is legimately dying) you can usually replace it and be okay. (recalling one instance from the massive thread regarding a 3ware 7506 with maxtor disks that had issues but once they replaced bad disks they were a-ok). You can use smartmontools to help you run tests on the hdds under a 3Ware controller while still in FreeBSD. It works in 4.X (with the latest snapshot of smartmontools). In the other cases where the disk appears fine, but still randomly pulls disks into DEGRADED mode, you have to find out why. In some cases it's because the power drop is too significant, which means you need to swap out your power supply. In other cases, the IDE cabling is legitimately bad (in my case, I highly suspect it is the IDE backplane, which is part of the disk-to-controller data path so I put bad cabling in quotes there). In short, 3Ware makes a note that you must ensure the entire data path is squeaky super clean. Of course, the problem could be the controller itself... 3Ware claims it takes a lot of punishment to DEGRADE the disks. There are some procedures to pull out the extended diagnostics from 3Ware controllers via the 3ware command line utility and if you send them to 3Ware they can try to tell you more information. In my case, 3Ware copped out and gave me some BS excuse for why my system had issues. - Carroll Kong ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: "Carroll Kong" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 6:27 PM Subject: Re: 3ware raid > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Carroll Kong wrote: > > > 4) Monitor the system carefully. Apparently in DEGRADED mode, the > > system has a high chance of complete lockups if left unattended. It is > > important to note that the 3Ware controller is very sensitive. People > > have gone into DEGRADED mode randomly because of slight power drops or > > "bad" IDE cabling. > > How do you test (and fix) something like this? revive the drive and hope > the same drive doesn't happen again? > > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 00:27:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4A416A4CE; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:27:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beer.ux6.net (beer.ux6.net [64.62.253.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3362F43D53; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:27:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: from [64.62.253.84] (helo=m) by beer.ux6.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CMbfM-0003az-R9; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:27:54 -0700 From: "Mikhail P." To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:27:47 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "beer.ux6.net", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, On our next file server, I want to make one large FTP area out of 4 drives (so that system sees them as onewith Vinum previously, but hear a lot about it. My question is how to Vinum, and what will happen if let's say one drive fails in volume? Am I loosing the whole data, or I can just unplug the drive, tell vinum to use remaining drives with the data each drive holds? I'm not looking for fault tolerance solution. [...] Content analysis details: (-4.9 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description --------------------------------------------------1% [score: 0.0000] cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:27:54 -0000 Hello, On our next file server, I want to make one large FTP area out of 4 drives = (so=20 that system sees them as one volume). Vinum appears to be exactly what I=20 need. I haven't worked with Vinum previously, but hear a lot about it. My questio= n=20 is how to implement the above (unite four drives into single volume) using= =20 Vinum, and what will happen if let's say one drive fails in volume? Am I=20 loosing the whole data, or I can just unplug the drive, tell vinum to use=20 remaining drives with the data each drive holds? I'm not looking for fault= =20 tolerance solution. =46rom my understanding, in above scenario, Vinum will first fill up the fi= rst=20 drive, then second, etc. I have read the handbook articles, and I got general understanding of Vinum. I'm particularly interested to know if I will still be able to use volume i= n=20 case of failed drive. Some minimal configuration examples would be greatly appreciated! Server will be running FreeBSD-4.10. regards, M. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 01:06:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A2116A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:06:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from util.inch.com (mx.inch.com [216.223.198.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66FB43D5C for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (www.inch.com [216.223.192.20]) i9R16AxW087524 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:06:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.inch.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9R16AJS026548 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:06:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost)i9R16A4M026545 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:06:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell.inch.com: spork owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:06:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041026205844.V2588@shell.inch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:06:12 -0000 Hi, I'm looking for some feedback on the following two SATA RAID controllers: http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata8000.asp (4 port) http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/proddetail.html?sess=no&language=English+US&prodkey=AAR-2410SA&cat=%2fTechnology%2fRAID%2fSerial+ATA+RAID I'd love to hear from 5.x users with recent 8000-series controllers -- I'm really leaning towards 5.x for this project as the release schedule finally matches my build schedule. Both cards look good on paper, and the pricing is similar. I'm mainly concerned about stability in real-world use. I've seen a number of recent positive comments from those using the 3Ware under 4.x, but as someone with an older Escalade (sorry dmesg doesn't report the model number), I'm a bit leery. Going to 4.10 caused the thing to lock up under heavy disk load, apparently the vendor-provided driver is worse than the old driver Mike Smith put together. I used the "Ask 3ware" link on their site to see what the party line was on FreeBSD and this is what I got back: ====== Charles, our support of FreeBSD is just as good as Windows and Linux (which is great!). We have embedded support in the main kernel and an open source driver that customers can compile to whichever kernel they are using if needed. There is a precompiled driver for both 4.X and 5.X versions on our website. We also have both an HTML based management utility and CLI available. Yahoo is actually one of our customers and helped promote the support for FreeBSD by 3ware. If you have any other questions please let me know. Regards, http://www.3ware.com/support/OS-Support.asp David Graas 3ware Corporate Sales Manager ====== Thanks, Charles From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 01:11:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E9616A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:11:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from util.inch.com (mx.inch.com [216.223.198.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1900D43D41 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:11:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (www.inch.com [216.223.192.20]) i9R1BlxW090537 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:11:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.inch.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9R1BlJS026655 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:11:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost)i9R1BlFx026652 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:11:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell.inch.com: spork owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:11:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041026210719.S2588@shell.inch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Best jail howto/FAQ X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:11:48 -0000 I know this is something of a frequent question, but jail seems to be evolving and many a google hit is no longer quite as relevant as I'd hoped. I'm leaning towards using 5.3 on a new project, so I'm mainly interested in any faqs/howtos beyond the manpage that address changes in jail from 4.x->5.x. What are some of the improvements in 5.3? Anyone have a particular doc on jail that's your favorite? Any favorite tools for managing jails? I'm looking to use this to isolate a few shell users from the rest of the system, it's not a huge web-hosting type project which seems to be the typical use of jail. Thanks, Charles -- Charles Sprickman spork@inch.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 02:26:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974F916A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:26:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hadar.amcc.com (hadar.amcc.com [192.195.69.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F2943D49 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:26:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vkashyap@amcc.com) Received: from mailhost02.amcc.com ([192.195.69.49]) by hadar.amcc.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id I681G400.4QK; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:26:28 -0700 Received: (from vkashyap-pc [10.66.6.61]) by mailhost02.amcc.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2004102619281308230 ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:28:13 -0700 From: "Vinod Kashyap" To: Charles Sprickman , stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:26:20 -0700 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 51114 (9.0.6627) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: Subject: RE: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:26:24 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Charles = > Sprickman > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 6:06 PM > To: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) > = > = > Hi, > = > I'm looking for some feedback on the following two SATA RAID = > controllers: > = > http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata8000.asp (4 port) > http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/proddetail.html?sess=3D no&language=3DEnglish+US&prodkey=3DAAR-2410SA&cat=3D%> 2fTechnology%2fRAID%= 2fSerial+ATA+RAID > = > I'd love to hear from 5.x users with recent 8000-series = > controllers -- I'm > really leaning towards 5.x for this project as the release schedule > finally matches my build schedule. Both cards look good on = > paper, and the > pricing is similar. I'm mainly concerned about stability in real-world > use. > = > I've seen a number of recent positive comments from those = > using the 3Ware > under 4.x, but as someone with an older Escalade (sorry dmesg doesn't > report the model number), I'm a bit leery. Going to 4.10 = > caused the thing > to lock up under heavy disk load, apparently the = > vendor-provided driver is > worse than the old driver Mike Smith put together. > = Use the driver (version 1.40.01.002) under RELENG_4_10 or RELENG_4. The driver (version 1.40.01.001) under RELENG_4_10_0_RELEASE has a known problem with 6xxx controllers. > I used the "Ask 3ware" link on their site to see what the = > party line was > on FreeBSD and this is what I got back: > = > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Charles, our support of FreeBSD is just as good as Windows and Linux > (which is great!). We have embedded support in the main kernel and an > open source driver that customers can compile to whichever kernel they > are using if needed. There is a precompiled driver for both = > 4.X and 5.X > versions on our website. We also have both an HTML based management > utility and CLI available. Yahoo is actually one of our customers and > helped promote the support for FreeBSD by 3ware. If you have any other > questions please let me know. Regards, > = > http://www.3ware.com/support/OS-Support.asp > = > David Graas > 3ware Corporate Sales Manager > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > = > Thanks, > = > Charles > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 02:47:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0446C16A4CF for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:47:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B6D43D3F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:47:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slackatefn@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so261477wri for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:47:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K6ij5lIRvTh4iXlZnidhTR2lAbyvjtqRpnRJ/9R/J0hbLinnUQB2KRSASqsZEWgc6MzZPM4WVg3sXJTO3fFuHw49TpnzxSHVaeAFwRsGHNjFWAnWFjXr3/RfskJ/ZwlI6yd5bbjlL8LtZCLR6dT+t5NhSRF5uY2EwAFfQmH2flY= Received: by 10.38.77.65 with SMTP id z65mr897755rna; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.99.40 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <91b5ebb0410261947192bd6f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:47:50 -0300 From: Martin Chikilian To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Plan for 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Chikilian List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 02:47:55 -0000 Hi Scott and lists. With all of this, i expect to keep testing RC1, and RC2 should come before 5.3 to be completely released. If 5.3 is scheduled to be released in 7-10 days, you could release -RC2 in next 3-5 days so we've the posibility to test fixed things that might not be in current -RC1. Just an idea. Cya, Martin > All, > Today was supposed to be the release day for 5.3, but some serious > show-stoppers came to light yesterday. Since the purpose of 5.3 is to > have a functionally stable release that is suitable for migrating to, > we decided to hold up 5.3 until these issues are fixed. The first issue > deals with TCP SACK problems that result in a livelocked system. The > second involves GDB leaving threaded processes in an unkillable state. > Fixes for both are under review and will be committed to RELENG_5 in a > few days when preliminary testing is complete. > I've also turned off ULE to help narrow down many of the ambiguous > problems that are still being reported. ULE works fine for some, but > it must be eliminated from the environment when you suspect a bug. > I expect to keep ULE off in 5.x until the rate of other problem reports > and decreased and someone takes an active interest in it. > Please continue to test RC1. At this point I'm not going to promise a > particular date for 5.3-RELEASE, but I would expect it in the next 7-10 > days assuming nothing else significant comes up. > Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 04:09:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4475D16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:09:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out008.verizon.net (out008pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB9343D2F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:09:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from STACY ([68.175.9.97]) by out008.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20041027040910.YUGS11892.out008.verizon.net@STACY>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:09:10 -0500 From: "Steve" To: "'Charles Sprickman'" , Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:09:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20041026205844.V2588@shell.inch.com> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcS7wTVE8yo92ZVARWKIvvj7IJBOpwAGWDAg X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out008.verizon.net from [68.175.9.97] at Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:09:06 -0500 Message-Id: <20041027040910.YUGS11892.out008.verizon.net@STACY> Subject: RE: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:09:11 -0000 I have both of them and will say this much 3ware 9xxx series is much better than adaptec, Adaptec will not work with dbsd without some tweaking, 3ware will work flawlessly. -- Steve Rieger -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:06 PM To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) Hi, I'm looking for some feedback on the following two SATA RAID controllers: http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata8000.asp (4 port) http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/proddetail.html?sess=no&language=En glish+US&prodkey=AAR-2410SA&cat=%2fTechnology%2fRAID%2fSerial+ATA+RAID I'd love to hear from 5.x users with recent 8000-series controllers -- I'm really leaning towards 5.x for this project as the release schedule finally matches my build schedule. Both cards look good on paper, and the pricing is similar. I'm mainly concerned about stability in real-world use. I've seen a number of recent positive comments from those using the 3Ware under 4.x, but as someone with an older Escalade (sorry dmesg doesn't report the model number), I'm a bit leery. Going to 4.10 caused the thing to lock up under heavy disk load, apparently the vendor-provided driver is worse than the old driver Mike Smith put together. I used the "Ask 3ware" link on their site to see what the party line was on FreeBSD and this is what I got back: ====== Charles, our support of FreeBSD is just as good as Windows and Linux (which is great!). We have embedded support in the main kernel and an open source driver that customers can compile to whichever kernel they are using if needed. There is a precompiled driver for both 4.X and 5.X versions on our website. We also have both an HTML based management utility and CLI available. Yahoo is actually one of our customers and helped promote the support for FreeBSD by 3ware. If you have any other questions please let me know. Regards, http://www.3ware.com/support/OS-Support.asp David Graas 3ware Corporate Sales Manager ====== Thanks, Charles _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 05:30:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1A616A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:30:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sku.tty.ch (sku.tty.ch [62.2.197.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F6143D2D for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:30:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stable@sku.tty.ch) Received: from sku.tty.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sku.tty.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9QHp6SZ075262; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:51:06 GMT (envelope-from stable@sku.tty.ch) Received: (from stable@localhost) by sku.tty.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9QHp6lt075261; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:51:06 GMT (envelope-from stable) Message-Id: <200410261751.i9QHp6lt075261@sku.tty.ch> To: _pppp@mail.ru Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:51:06 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: from "dima" at Oct 13, 2004 07:45:36 PM From: stable X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postgres X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:30:57 -0000 if the perms really need to be 600 i would do this (anyway i dont see a reason why other users should access /root) chmod 700 /root chmod 600 /root/.pgpass also check the ownership of these files -- > > > I'm trying to write a backup script for postgres and us a crontab on it. > > In the manual it says for pg_dumpall make $HOME/.pgpass so it won't ask > > for a password. > Do you use the correct .pgpass format? > It must be like that: > hostname:port:database:username:password > > > Now I made the .pgpass in root's homedir (i wanted to use root's > > crontab) paste the password in it, chmod 400 it ... > > But it still asks for a password ... > Documentation claims the permissions should be 600. > > > Does anybody know how to fix that ? > I happily use pg_dump & vacuumdb from crontab. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 05:33:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E5416A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:33:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F2343D39 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:33:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from security@jim-liesl.org) Received: from smtp.jim-liesl.org ([68.71.52.28]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20041027053344.WEGO2188.mta11.adelphia.net@smtp.jim-liesl.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:33:44 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [192.168.1.101]) by smtp.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E287152B4; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:33:43 -0600 (MDT) From: secmgr To: miha@ghuug.org In-Reply-To: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 26 Oct 2004 23:33:43 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:33:45 -0000 On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 18:27, Mikhail P. wrote: > I haven't worked with Vinum previously, but hear a lot about it. My question > is how to implement the above (unite four drives into single volume) using > Vinum, and what will happen if let's say one drive fails in volume? Am I > loosing the whole data, or I can just unplug the drive, tell vinum to use > remaining drives with the data each drive holds? I'm not looking for fault > tolerance solution. Since you don't care about fault tolerance, you probably want to do striping, also known as raid0. > From my understanding, in above scenario, Vinum will first fill up the first > drive, then second, etc. thats called concatenation, which is different than striping. striping balances the load across all the spindles > I have read the handbook articles, and I got general understanding of Vinum. > I'm particularly interested to know if I will still be able to use volume in > case of failed drive. If you want to do that, then you want raid5. If either a concat or stripe set looses a drive, the data will need to be restored. > Some minimal configuration examples would be greatly appreciated! Read the following. Really! http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/vinum.ps http://www.vinumvm.org/cfbsd/vinum.txt Both of these have examples and will clear up your confusion about concat vs stripe vs raid5. concat is the easiest to add to, stripe has the best performance, raid5 trades write speed and n+1 drives for resilience. raid10 gets back the performance at the cost of 2*n drives Broken down: volume - top level. what the filesystem talks to. mirroring is defined at the volume level as is raid 10 (mirrored stripe plexes) plex - a virtual storage area made up of 1 or more subdisks for concat 2 or more for stripe, or 3 or more subdisks for raid 5. subdisk - area delegated from a bsd partition drive - the actual bsd partition (as in /dev/da1s1h) generally, the order is as follows: -fdisk the drives to be used so they have at least one bsd slice each. -use disklabel to edit the slice label so you have at least one partition of type vinum (that isn't the C partition) -in an editor, create the configuration drives volume plex sd when you define the subdisk, don't use the whole drive. Leave at least 64 blocks unused. use the file you created as input to vinum vinum create -v -f config Or you can cheat and just say, "vinum stripe -n volname /dev/ad0s1h /dev/ad1s1h /dev/ad2s1h /dev/ad3s1h" (should be all on one line) Raid5 plexs have to be init'ed newfs -v /dev/vinum/volname mount /dev/vinum/volname /mnt hopefully I haven't made you're understanding worse From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 08:25:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46AA16A4E8 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:25:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5925743D3F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:25:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ioport@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so64242rnb for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:25:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=c/7YXdbbMlEKuI5eIbzSmFqMqYtdFtu37ZXuwnJDqq1yJOzDVfT8ZDDHYs1iHV80qaI7d0CNZMFWnadNNYvBJxnRn3ybMNgwLh5EQRpOuwc4pRRCtkxBb3uNgkCEsa/2Ora9in98Hxj37nEtssPGUhO1/7Zc6IBK0JycQpbWB24= Received: by 10.38.98.30 with SMTP id v30mr394696rnb; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.22 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54c26bd804102701254853e79f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:25:26 -0500 From: Darren Decker To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: /dev is full...help X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Darren Decker List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:25:42 -0000 My /dev is at 100%. How can I give /dev more room? Thanks, Darren From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 08:30:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D74316A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:30:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f15.mail.ru (f15.mail.ru [194.67.57.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E202D43D46 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:30:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from _pppp@mail.ru) Received: from mail by f15.mail.ru with local id 1CMjCH-0003uF-00; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:30:21 +0400 Received: from [81.200.13.122] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:30:21 +0400 From: dima <_pppp@mail.ru> To: Darren Decker Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [81.200.13.122] Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:30:21 +0400 In-Reply-To: <54c26bd804102701254853e79f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev is full...help X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dima <_pppp@mail.ru> List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:30:23 -0000 /dev is a *virtual* filesystem. It is physically located inside the kernel, not on your hard drive. So, it is always full & you can't do anything about that :) -----Original Message----- From: Darren Decker To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:25:26 -0500 Subject: /dev is full...help > > My /dev is at 100%. How can I give /dev more room? > > Thanks, > Darren > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 10:02:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A0A16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:02:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ip212-226-164-78.adsl.kpnqwest.fi (ip212-226-164-93.adsl.kpnqwest.fi [212.226.164.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E0E43D49 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:02:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mjraiha@ip212-226-164-78.adsl.kpnqwest.fi) Received: from ip212-226-164-78.adsl.kpnqwest.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i9RA2Trw011130; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:02:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mjraiha@ip212-226-164-78.adsl.kpnqwest.fi) Received: (from mjraiha@localhost)i9RA2TKb011129; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:02:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mjraiha) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:02:29 +0300 From: Marko Raiha To: secmgr Message-ID: <20041027100229.GB6391@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Time-Zone: FI EET, 3 hours east of GMT. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.3-RC1 i386 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:02:35 -0000 Hi, On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:33:43PM -0600, secmgr wrote: > ... > when you define the subdisk, don't use the whole drive. Leave at least > 64 blocks unused. > ... Would you mind to tell the reason behind this rule of leaving at least 64 blocks unused? Regards, -- Marko Räihä From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 10:04:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D65E16A4EE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:04:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vision-bsd.nl (kf-sdm-cb01-0127.dial.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.26.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B42143D41 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:04:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@vision-bsd.nl) Received: (qmail 75316 invoked by uid 1018); 27 Oct 2004 10:04:23 -0000 Received: from sam@vision-bsd.nl by freebsd.sam.intern by uid 1016 with qmail-scanner-1.22-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.75. spamassassin: 3.0.1. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.4):. Processed in 3.903645 secs); 27 Oct 2004 10:04:23 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: sam@vision-bsd.nl via freebsd.sam.intern X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.22-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.4):. Processed in 3.903645 secs Process 75307) Received: from sam-kamer.sam.intern (HELO SamKamer) (192.168.0.4) by vision-bsd.nl with SMTP; 27 Oct 2004 10:04:19 -0000 From: "Samuel Trommel" To: "'Charles Sprickman'" , Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:04:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20041026210719.S2588@shell.inch.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcS7wgvYM0Wl/SMsSJWyIa2yjToLDgASXqlw X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Message-ID: <109887145983575307@freebsd.sam.intern> Message-Id: <20041027100424.2B42143D41@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: Best jail howto/FAQ X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:04:25 -0000 Hello Charles, I think this is what you searching for: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/09/04/jails.html Maybe it doesn't suid your needs because you need more ip-adresses for this. Personally I'm using: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~coreya/OpenBSD/chroot_ssh/ Let me know if something is unclear.. Greets, Samuel Trommel -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman Sent: woensdag 27 oktober 2004 3:12 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Best jail howto/FAQ I know this is something of a frequent question, but jail seems to be evolving and many a google hit is no longer quite as relevant as I'd hoped. I'm leaning towards using 5.3 on a new project, so I'm mainly interested in any faqs/howtos beyond the manpage that address changes in jail from 4.x->5.x. What are some of the improvements in 5.3? Anyone have a particular doc on jail that's your favorite? Any favorite tools for managing jails? I'm looking to use this to isolate a few shell users from the rest of the system, it's not a huge web-hosting type project which seems to be the typical use of jail. Thanks, Charles -- Charles Sprickman spork@inch.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 11:14:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84B616A4CF for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:14:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beer.ux6.net (beer.ux6.net [64.62.253.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590C543D2D for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:14:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: from [64.62.253.84] (helo=m) by beer.ux6.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CMllJ-0002qV-3R; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 04:14:42 -0700 From: "Mikhail P." Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group To: secmgr Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:14:36 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> In-Reply-To: <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410271114.36794.miha@ghuug.org> X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "beer.ux6.net", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.> I> Vinum. I'm particularly interested to know if I will still be able to use > > volume in case of failed drive. > > If you want to do that, drive, the data will need to be restored. [...] Content analysis details: (-4.9 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description --------------------------------------------------1% [score: 0.0000] cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:14:42 -0000 On Wednesday 27 October 2004 05:33, secmgr wrote: > > I have read the handbook articles, and I got general understanding of > > Vinum. I'm particularly interested to know if I will still be able to use > > volume in case of failed drive. > > If you want to do that, then you want raid5. If either a concat or > stripe set looses a drive, the data will need to be restored. Are there known methods/techniques to restore data from failed concat or stripe volumes? > > > Some minimal configuration examples would be greatly appreciated! > > Read the following. Really! > http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/vinum.ps > http://www.vinumvm.org/cfbsd/vinum.txt > Both of these have examples and will clear up your confusion about > concat vs stripe vs raid5. > > concat is the easiest to add to, stripe has the best performance, raid5 > trades write speed and n+1 drives for resilience. raid10 gets back the > performance at the cost of 2*n drives Thanks. Your explanation really helped me a lot. Does striping require an additional drive too? Or it is very similar to concat, except for it stores data across all the spindles? Does it also mean that it is harder to recover stripped volume? As for raid5 - it requires an additional drive. Are there any requirements for the drive? E.g. would it work as having 3 x 200GB for stripe + additional 20GB drive that will be used for control blocks? And what happens here if 20GB drive fails - will I be able to rebuild it and continue using raid? > hopefully I haven't made you're understanding worse Thanks, it made my understanding better for sure. regards, M. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 12:05:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A80F16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:05:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D4443D3F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:05:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-246-51.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.246.51]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9RC5Ap8086460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:05:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <417F8EF6.9060304@mac.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:05:10 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: miha@ghuug.org References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> <200410271114.36794.miha@ghuug.org> In-Reply-To: <200410271114.36794.miha@ghuug.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on pi.codefab.com cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:05:17 -0000 Mikhail P. wrote: > On Wednesday 27 October 2004 05:33, secmgr wrote: [ ... ] >> If you want to do that, then you want raid5. If either a concat or >> stripe set looses a drive, the data will need to be restored. > > Are there known methods/techniques to restore data from failed concat or > stripe volumes? Certainly. It's known as "taking a backup", perhaps to a tape drive or some other form of storage. If you don't have a backup, and you lose a disk in a RAID-0 config, you will effectively lose all of the data. [ ... ] > Does striping require an additional drive too? No. > Or it is very similar to > concat, except for it stores data across all the spindles? Yes, that's right. > Does it also mean that it is harder to recover stripped volume? The question isn't well-phrased: you can't recover data from either if you lose a drive. > As for raid5 - it requires an additional drive. Are there any requirements for > the drive? E.g. would it work as having 3 x 200GB for stripe + additional > 20GB drive that will be used for control blocks? No. All of the drives need to be the same size. With RAID-5, which drive is used to hold parity data rotates on a stripe-by-stripe basis to balance out the load. > And what happens here if > 20GB drive fails - will I be able to rebuild it and continue using raid? You can rebuild a RAID-5 volume if a single drive fails without losing data. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 12:11:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA2E16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:11:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4E943D41 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i9RCBlb01331 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:11:47 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:11:46 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD STABLE list In-Reply-To: <417F8EF6.9060304@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> <200410271114.36794.miha@ghuug.org> <417F8EF6.9060304@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:11:52 -0000 On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > Are there known methods/techniques to restore data from failed concat or > > stripe volumes? > > Certainly. It's known as "taking a backup", perhaps to a tape drive or some > other form of storage. If you don't have a backup, and you lose a disk in a > RAID-0 config, you will effectively lose all of the data. Or you can pay squillions to a data-recovery service (been there, done that, and not my fault). -- Dave From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 12:46:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C87616A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:46:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from defiant4.noxa.de (defiant.noxa.de [212.60.197.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D99243D1F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:46:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arundel@h3c.de) Received: (qmail 27438 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2004 14:46:18 +0200 Received: from pd9e51806.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO skatecity.) (217.229.24.6) by defiant.noxa.de with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Oct 2004 14:46:18 +0200 Received: from skatecity. (freebsd@skatecity. [127.0.0.1]) by skatecity. (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9RCpcSB083045 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:51:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from arundel@skatecity) Received: (from arundel@localhost) by skatecity. (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9RCpbNe083044 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:51:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from arundel) From: alexander Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:51:37 +0200 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041027125137.GA82966@skatecity> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <91b5ebb0410261947192bd6f8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <91b5ebb0410261947192bd6f8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Plan for 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:46:23 -0000 On Tue Oct 26 04, Martin Chikilian wrote: > Hi Scott and lists. > With all of this, i expect to keep testing RC1, and RC2 should come > before 5.3 to be completely released. > If 5.3 is scheduled to be released in 7-10 days, you could release > -RC2 in next 3-5 days so we've the posibility to test fixed things > that might not be in current -RC1. > Just an idea. > > Cya, > Martin > That's a really good idea. In fact, I wouldn't set a static release date at all. You guys should try fixing all the bugs that poped up in the -RC1 and release a second RC. Continue in that fassion until there are no major bug reports filed in let's say...two weeks. Of course people want 5.3 to be released as quickly as possible, but the very same people will complain, if that RLEASE will only have a single bug in it. Having one or more major or even fatal bugs in 5.3-RELEASE could be really nasty. High traffic load in mailing lists, ISO hash changes, doc changes. And please don't forget 4.11. ;) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 13:49:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D249A16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:49:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99AE43D4C for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:49:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9RDoIiF068217; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:50:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9RDoGD5068216; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:50:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:50:16 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Willie Winslow Message-ID: <20041027135016.GA68089@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Willie Winslow , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <0C32636D8A9C244390214BA6AEA3B65003BEBAE6@exchange.mainemutual> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0C32636D8A9C244390214BA6AEA3B65003BEBAE6@exchange.mainemutual> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=failed version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on ei.bzerk.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Change IP address X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:49:04 -0000 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:18:22AM -0400, Willie Winslow typed: > I need to change the IP address of my FreeBSD box, it is also our Name > Server. > > I am aware that I need to change the following; > /etc/rc.conf > /etc/resolv.conf > /etc/namedb/mydomain.com > > Is there anything else that needs to be changed? The nameserver configuration on all your clients :-) I hope you have DHCP ;) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 13:50:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EC416A4CE; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:50:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout-1.iphouse.net (smtpout-1.iphouse.net [216.250.188.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A0D43D1F; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from veldy.net (fuggle.veldy.net [209.240.64.129]) by smtpout-1.iphouse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9A51086E; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:50:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.veldy.net [127.0.0.1]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904BEF1; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:50:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from veldy.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fuggle.veldy.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03516-07; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:50:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fuggle.veldy.net [192.168.1.3]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEF81D; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:49:59 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <417FA785.2080600@veldy.net> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:49:57 -0500 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7A70FCC224117F42C50650FD" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at veldy.net Subject: When do ports unfreeze now that 5.3 is tagged for RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:50:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7A70FCC224117F42C50650FD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit When do the ports get "unfrozen" now that FreeBSD 5.3 has been tagged as RELEASE [via /usr/src/UPDATING]? There are several ports that I would like to see upgraded [like dspam] to the more recent levels and I have been told that they are waiting out the freeze. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 Spammers please contact me at renegade@veldy.net. --------------enig7A70FCC224117F42C50650FD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBf6eIARgTFXYf0wARApz6AKCpw8FDyuTZw0Q02SHXtjhJfRvLxACgrJYQ Hk4bxRhXJoYc1mxYzKXcRDw= =mIaZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7A70FCC224117F42C50650FD-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 14:22:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D71716A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:22:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2F343D5D for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:22:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D15E8521A6; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:23:17 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Darren Decker Message-ID: <20041027142317.GA32428@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <54c26bd804102701254853e79f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54c26bd804102701254853e79f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev is full...help X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:22:15 -0000 --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 03:25:26AM -0500, Darren Decker wrote: > My /dev is at 100%. How can I give /dev more room? [Assuming you're running 5.x, you forgot to mention this] You don't need to, and if you think you do you're doing something wrong :-) Kris --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBf69VWry0BWjoQKURAnFzAJ9tqMDlSLyMmoCIjD/24nfgF3B2GgCfZt/w XIoMX/3fmh2bel3g/bQ7QGc= =VXl/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 14:57:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD9816A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:57:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB2843D2F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from security@jim-liesl.org) Received: from smtp.jim-liesl.org ([68.71.52.28]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20041027145704.CESX2497.mta9.adelphia.net@smtp.jim-liesl.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:57:04 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.jim-liesl.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ACB152B2; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:57:03 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <417FB764.2040109@jim-liesl.org> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:57:40 -0600 From: secmgr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> <200410271114.36794.miha@ghuug.org> <417F8EF6.9060304@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <417F8EF6.9060304@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: miha@ghuug.org Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:57:06 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > No. All of the drives need to be the same size. With RAID-5, which > drive is used to hold parity data rotates on a stripe-by-stripe basis > to balance out the load. Just to clarify this point. All the subdisks in the plex need to be the same size. The physical drives and even the bsd partitions/vinum drives do not actually have to be the same. An example would be you have 2x 40gig partitions, and 2x 60 gig partitions. You could make a stripe set using 4 40gig (160gig) subdisks (or a 120gig raid 5 set). You just would't use the remaining 20 gig on the other two drives. You could use the space, just not for this plex. (you could create a 40gig (20+20) stripe or concat set or a mirrored 20gig area) Concat, on the other hand doesn't care and would happily use 40+40+60+60 (just not with the same perf levels) jim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 15:04:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2415716A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:04:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1180843D3F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:04:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 29008 invoked by uid 513); 27 Oct 2004 15:04:04 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.261553 secs); 27 Oct 2004 15:04:04 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 27 Oct 2004 15:04:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:05:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Samuel Trommel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20041027165429.E1732@pukruppa.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-2140220911-1098889536=:1732" cc: Samuel Trommel cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:04:02 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-2140220911-1098889536=:1732 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Just set named=3D"NO" instead of "YES" reboot you server=20 > and(rc.conf). Change the DNS-Server of you clients in: > > Primary nameserver 195.62.99.42 > Secundary nameserver 195.62.97.177 Yes, that works, thank you so far, but ... I never had to do this before this way. I always simply set my=20 gateway as name-server and I wonder what has changed the last=20 week or so. Just imagine, I had to upgrade our school's gateway/proxy (which=20 runs on 4.7) one day: I would have to run around and change 40x2=20 nameserver addresses. Uli. > > greets, > > Samuel Trommel > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] > Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:55 > Aan: Samuel Trommel > CC: Samuel Trommel; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken??? > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > >> Oke.. are you using DHCP or static. > No, I am using static. > >> If i'm not right. Give us some more information about your >> setup.. i'm just guessing around now.. > > Really sorry about this, I set this up long ago and never thought > about it again. > > Uli. > >> >> greets, >> >> Samuel Trommel >> >> Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] >> Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:20 >> Aan: Samuel Trommel >> CC: Samuel Trommel; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >> Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken??? >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: >> >>> Hello Peter, >>> >>> Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all. >> Windows-IP-Konfiguration >> >> =09Hostname=09=09=09=09: tiny >> =09Prim=E4res DNS-Suffix=09=09=09: >> =09Knotentyp=09=09=09=09: Hybrid >> =09IP-Routing aktiviert=09=09=09: Nein >> =09WINS-Proxy aktiviert=09=09=09: Nein >> >> Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung >> >> =09Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix=09: >> =09Beschreibung=09=09=09=09: 00-80-88-03-C4- >> =09=09=09=09=09=09=093A >> =09DHCP aktiviert=09=09=09=09: Nein >> =09IP-Adresse=09=09=09=09: 192.168.10.4 >> Subnetzmaske=09=09=09=09: 255.255.255.0 >> Standardgateway=09=09=09=09: 192.168.10.1 >> =09DNS-Server=09=09=09=09: 192.168.10.1 >> =09prim=E4rer WINS-Server=09=09=09: 192.168.10.1 >> >> >>> And in the case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf. >> >> nameserver 192.168.10.1 >> >>> >>> So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off? >> Doesn't work either. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Samuel Trommel >>> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >>> Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] >>> Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22 >>> Aan: Samuel Trommel >>> CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >>> Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken??? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following: >>>> >>>> - show us your /etc/resolv.conf >>> domain=09pukruppa.de >>> nameserver 195.62.99.42 >>> nameserver 195.62.97.177 >>> >>> >>>> - are you really sure named is configured correctly? >>> No, until now I never had to configure anything there. >>> >>> >>> Uli. >>> >>>> greets, >>>> >>>> Samuel Trommel >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed >>>>> something new. >>>>> >>>>> I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. >>>>> Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >>>>>> From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but >>>>> domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). >>>>> >>>>> These are my rc.conf lines: >>>>> >>>>> kern_securelevel_enable=3D"NO" >>>>> inetd_enable=3D"YES" >>>>> gateway_enable=3D"YES" >>>>> named_enable=3D"YES" >>>>> ppp_enable=3D"YES" >>>>> ppp_mode=3D"ddial" >>>>> ppp_nat=3D"YES" >>>>> ppp_profile=3D"my-profile" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for any hints, >>>>> >>>>> Uli. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> =09+---------------------------+ >>>>> =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >>>>> | Wuppertal | >>>>> | Germany | >>>>> +---------------------------+ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >>>> >>> >>> =09+---------------------------+ >>> =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >>> | Wuppertal | >>> | Germany | >>> +---------------------------+ >>> -- >>> Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. >>> Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >>> >>> >> >> =09+---------------------------+ >> =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >> | Wuppertal | >> | Germany | >> +---------------------------+ >> -- >> Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. >> Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ >> >> > > =09+---------------------------+ > =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | > | Wuppertal | > | Germany | > +---------------------------+ > -- > Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. > Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > =09+---------------------------+ =09| Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ --0-2140220911-1098889536=:1732-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 15:10:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197A716A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:10:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF0043D49 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from security@jim-liesl.org) Received: from smtp.jim-liesl.org ([68.71.52.28]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20041027151004.XZBX18454.mta10.adelphia.net@smtp.jim-liesl.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:10:04 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.jim-liesl.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9DB152B2; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:10:02 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <417FBA6F.7040406@jim-liesl.org> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:10:39 -0600 From: secmgr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marko Raiha References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> <20041027100229.GB6391@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> In-Reply-To: <20041027100229.GB6391@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:10:08 -0000 Marko Raiha wrote: >Hi, > >On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:33:43PM -0600, secmgr wrote: > > >>... >>when you define the subdisk, don't use the whole drive. Leave at least >>64 blocks unused. >>... >> >> > >Would you mind to tell the reason behind this rule of leaving at least >64 blocks unused? > >Regards, > > The reason is empirically derived. When I created a 7 disk raid 5 set using "len 0" or all the space available, the raid set would be corrupt after initializing. Every time. When I reserved back that extra space, no corruption. (freebsd 4.10-p3) There was a thread on this a few days ago. jim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 15:14:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA5916A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:14:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maquis.kabelfoon.nl (maquis.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.52.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F8F43D31 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:14:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from s.trommel@helpdesk.kabelfoon.nl) Received: from kabfoon.kabelfoon.intern (kabfoon.office.kabelfoon.intern [192.168.12.252]) by maquis.kabelfoon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6752FA08; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:13:59 +0200 (CEST) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:11:54 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ppp -nat broken??? Thread-Index: AcS8NehPPUGzYfJySDWx2OcdVeViqwAAN9TA From: "Samuel Trommel" To: "Peter Ulrich Kruppa" cc: Samuel Trommel cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:14:01 -0000 And that is where dhcpd comes in to play:D Just setup a DHCP-server and you are done.. greets, Samuel Trommel -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] Verzonden: woensdag 27 oktober 2004 17:06 Aan: Samuel Trommel CC: Samuel Trommel; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken??? On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Just set named=3D"NO" instead of "YES" reboot you server=20 > and(rc.conf). Change the DNS-Server of you clients in: > > Primary nameserver 195.62.99.42 > Secundary nameserver 195.62.97.177 Yes, that works, thank you so far, but ... I never had to do this before this way. I always simply set my=20 gateway as name-server and I wonder what has changed the last=20 week or so. Just imagine, I had to upgrade our school's gateway/proxy (which=20 runs on 4.7) one day: I would have to run around and change 40x2=20 nameserver addresses. Uli. > > greets, > > Samuel Trommel > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] > Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:55 > Aan: Samuel Trommel > CC: Samuel Trommel; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken??? > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > >> Oke.. are you using DHCP or static. > No, I am using static. > >> If i'm not right. Give us some more information about your >> setup.. i'm just guessing around now.. > > Really sorry about this, I set this up long ago and never thought > about it again. > > Uli. > >> >> greets, >> >> Samuel Trommel >> >> Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] >> Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:20 >> Aan: Samuel Trommel >> CC: Samuel Trommel; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >> Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken??? >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: >> >>> Hello Peter, >>> >>> Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all. >> Windows-IP-Konfiguration >> >> Hostname : tiny >> Prim=E4res DNS-Suffix : >> Knotentyp : Hybrid >> IP-Routing aktiviert : Nein >> WINS-Proxy aktiviert : Nein >> >> Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung >> >> Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix : >> Beschreibung : 00-80-88-03-C4- >> 3A >> DHCP aktiviert : Nein >> IP-Adresse : 192.168.10.4 >> Subnetzmaske : 255.255.255.0 >> Standardgateway : 192.168.10.1 >> DNS-Server : 192.168.10.1 >> prim=E4rer WINS-Server : 192.168.10.1 >> >> >>> And in the case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf. >> >> nameserver 192.168.10.1 >> >>> >>> So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off? >> Doesn't work either. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Samuel Trommel >>> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >>> Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:root@pukruppa.de] >>> Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22 >>> Aan: Samuel Trommel >>> CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >>> Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken??? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following: >>>> >>>> - show us your /etc/resolv.conf >>> domain pukruppa.de >>> nameserver 195.62.99.42 >>> nameserver 195.62.97.177 >>> >>> >>>> - are you really sure named is configured correctly? >>> No, until now I never had to configure anything there. >>> >>> >>> Uli. >>> >>>> greets, >>>> >>>> Samuel Trommel >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed >>>>> something new. >>>>> >>>>> I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. >>>>> Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. >>>>>> From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but >>>>> domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). >>>>> >>>>> These are my rc.conf lines: >>>>> >>>>> kern_securelevel_enable=3D"NO" >>>>> inetd_enable=3D"YES" >>>>> gateway_enable=3D"YES" >>>>> named_enable=3D"YES" >>>>> ppp_enable=3D"YES" >>>>> ppp_mode=3D"ddial" >>>>> ppp_nat=3D"YES" >>>>> ppp_profile=3D"my-profile" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for any hints, >>>>> >>>>> Uli. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +---------------------------+ >>>>> | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >>>>> | Wuppertal | >>>>> | Germany | >>>>> +---------------------------+ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>> >>> +---------------------------+ >>> | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >>> | Wuppertal | >>> | Germany | >>> +---------------------------+ >>> -- >>> Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. >>> Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >> >> +---------------------------+ >> | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | >> | Wuppertal | >> | Germany | >> +---------------------------+ >> -- >> Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. >> Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ >> >> > > +---------------------------+ > | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | > | Wuppertal | > | Germany | > +---------------------------+ > -- > Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij. > Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ -- Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij.=20 Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 16:21:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0284F16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:21:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from amazone.ujf-grenoble.fr (amazone.ujf-grenoble.fr [193.54.238.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0DD43D55 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:21:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Gilles.Bruno@ujf-grenoble.fr) Received: from tibre2.ujf-grenoble.fr (tana1.ujf-grenoble.fr [152.77.18.74]) JE 9 8 2004) with ESMTP id i9RGLksT004944; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:21:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurua.ujf-grenoble.fr (jurua.ujf-grenoble.fr [152.77.1.154]) i9RGLkWS016463; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:21:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Gilles.Bruno@ujf-grenoble.fr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.ujf-grenoble.fr [127.0.0.1]) i9RGLk0r014898; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:21:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Gilles.Bruno@ujf-grenoble.fr) Message-ID: <417FCB1A.9040308@ujf-grenoble.fr> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:21:46 +0200 From: Gilles Bruno User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040524 X-Accept-Language: fr, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gareth Hopkins References: <20041027022636.9312016A548@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20041027022636.9312016A548@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 84, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:21:52 -0000 Hi Gareth, we are currently working on it in order to make FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE recognize our PowerEdge 1850 Perc 4e/SI (not a PCI-Express one !!) Next week we'll also test a Perc 4/DC on it Basically, you just have to add it's pci signature to the amr driver. The following patch applies to amr_pci.c (cvsup'ed) It has not been thouroughtly tested so use it at your own risk - but so far it has not made any glitches to us --- 4.10-rel/amr_pci.c Wed Oct 27 18:15:12 2004 +++ amr_pci.c Wed Oct 27 18:15:12 2004 @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ {0x1000, 0x1960, PROBE_SIGNATURE}, {0x1000, 0x0407, 0}, {0x1028, 0x000e, PROBE_SIGNATURE}, /* perc4/di i960 */ + {0x1028, 0x0013, 0}, /* perc4e/Si */ {0x1028, 0x000f, 0}, /* perc4/di Verde*/ {0, 0, 0} }; @@ -180,7 +181,8 @@ */ command = pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_COMMAND, 1); if ((pci_get_device(dev) == 0x1960) || (pci_get_device(dev) == 0x0407) || - (pci_get_device(dev) == 0x000e) || (pci_get_device(dev) == 0x000f)) { + (pci_get_device(dev) == 0x000e) || (pci_get_device(dev) == 0x000f) || + (pci_get_device(dev) == 0x0013)) { /* * Make sure we are going to be able to talk to this board. */ Regards, > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:51:28 +0200 (South Africa Standard Time) > From: Gareth Hopkins > Subject: Future support for PERC 4e/XX cards > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > Howdie, > > Was wondering if the following cards would be supported in the > near future by BSD 4.10. > > PERC 4e/Si and PERC 4e/Di. These are from the new Dell poweredge 1850 and > 2850 servers. > > --- > Gareth Hopkins > System Operations > UUNET ZA > -- Gilles BRUNO System Admin. Universite Joseph Fourier - CRIP From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 16:31:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2245E16A4CE; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:31:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B364E43D49; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i9RGV8Qh077962 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:31:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i9RGV8GV077961; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:31:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:31:08 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Message-ID: <20041027163108.GA77712@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <417FA785.2080600@veldy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <417FA785.2080600@veldy.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:31:09 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When do ports unfreeze now that 5.3 is tagged for RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:31:15 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 08:49:57AM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > When do the ports get "unfrozen" now that FreeBSD 5.3 has been tagged as= =20 > RELEASE [via /usr/src/UPDATING]? There are several ports that I would=20 > like to see upgraded [like dspam] to the more recent levels and I have=20 > been told that they are waiting out the freeze. About two weeks ago... Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBf81MiD657aJF7eIRAhUNAJ9pQeKp8vrYxAGddeuFZ2sOUlHMywCePuKV 0yuS9s43dHEObCtTYbD0RbY= =KN3Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 17:26:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B01816A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:26:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from util.inch.com (mx.inch.com [216.223.198.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A450B43D48 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:26:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (www.inch.com [216.223.192.20]) i9RHQ1Ar050602; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:26:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.inch.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9RHPxJS081573; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:25:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost)i9RHPxJx081570; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:25:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell.inch.com: spork owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:25:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman To: Samuel Trommel In-Reply-To: <200410271004.i9RA4NRp075870@util.inch.com> Message-ID: <20041027132435.C2588@shell.inch.com> References: <200410271004.i9RA4NRp075870@util.inch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Best jail howto/FAQ X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:26:03 -0000 On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Hello Charles, > > I think this is what you searching for: > > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/09/04/jails.html I found that and many others, but I'm trying to find something a little more current. I'd also like to see some discussion on keeping the jail environment as small as needed, and some info on maintenance of the jail environment. Thanks, Charles > Maybe it doesn't suid your needs because you need more ip-adresses for this. > > Personally I'm using: > > http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~coreya/OpenBSD/chroot_ssh/ > > Let me know if something is unclear.. > > Greets, > > Samuel Trommel > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman > Sent: woensdag 27 oktober 2004 3:12 > To: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Best jail howto/FAQ > > I know this is something of a frequent question, but jail seems to be > evolving and many a google hit is no longer quite as relevant as I'd > hoped. > > I'm leaning towards using 5.3 on a new project, so I'm mainly interested > in any faqs/howtos beyond the manpage that address changes in jail from > 4.x->5.x. What are some of the improvements in 5.3? Anyone have a > particular doc on jail that's your favorite? Any favorite tools for > managing jails? > > I'm looking to use this to isolate a few shell users from the rest of the > system, it's not a huge web-hosting type project which seems to be the > typical use of jail. > > Thanks, > > Charles > > -- > Charles Sprickman > spork@inch.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 17:26:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D3316A4CF for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:26:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from util.inch.com (mx.inch.com [216.223.198.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A605E43D55 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:26:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (www.inch.com [216.223.192.20]) i9RHQMAr050807; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:26:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.inch.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9RHQMJS081589; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:26:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost)i9RHQM4e081586; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:26:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell.inch.com: spork owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:26:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman To: Steve In-Reply-To: <20041027040910.YUGS11892.out008.verizon.net@STACY> Message-ID: <20041027132604.J2588@shell.inch.com> References: <20041027040910.YUGS11892.out008.verizon.net@STACY> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:26:24 -0000 On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Steve wrote: > 3ware 9xxx series is much better than adaptec, > Adaptec will not work with dbsd without some tweaking, 3ware will work > flawlessly. Are you running 4.x or 5.x? Thanks, Charles > > -- > Steve Rieger > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:06 PM > To: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) > > Hi, > > I'm looking for some feedback on the following two SATA RAID controllers: > > http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata8000.asp (4 port) > http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/proddetail.html?sess=no&language=En > glish+US&prodkey=AAR-2410SA&cat=%2fTechnology%2fRAID%2fSerial+ATA+RAID > > I'd love to hear from 5.x users with recent 8000-series controllers -- I'm > really leaning towards 5.x for this project as the release schedule finally > matches my build schedule. Both cards look good on paper, and the pricing > is similar. I'm mainly concerned about stability in real-world use. > > I've seen a number of recent positive comments from those using the 3Ware > under 4.x, but as someone with an older Escalade (sorry dmesg doesn't report > the model number), I'm a bit leery. Going to 4.10 caused the thing to lock > up under heavy disk load, apparently the vendor-provided driver is worse > than the old driver Mike Smith put together. > > I used the "Ask 3ware" link on their site to see what the party line was on > FreeBSD and this is what I got back: > > ====== > Charles, our support of FreeBSD is just as good as Windows and Linux (which > is great!). We have embedded support in the main kernel and an open source > driver that customers can compile to whichever kernel they are using if > needed. There is a precompiled driver for both 4.X and 5.X versions on our > website. We also have both an HTML based management utility and CLI > available. Yahoo is actually one of our customers and helped promote the > support for FreeBSD by 3ware. If you have any other questions please let me > know. Regards, > > http://www.3ware.com/support/OS-Support.asp > > David Graas > 3ware Corporate Sales Manager > ====== > > Thanks, > > Charles > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 19:55:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFA216A4CF for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:55:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7B943D39 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:55:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from bsdbox.farid-hajji.net (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0C84B17E; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:54:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:56:32 +0200 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: Samuel Trommel Message-ID: <20041027195632.GA1888@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Peter Ulrich Kruppa cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:55:02 -0000 On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:11:54PM +0200, Samuel Trommel wrote: > > > Primary nameserver 195.62.99.42 > > > Secundary nameserver 195.62.97.177 > > Yes, that works, thank you so far, but ... > > I never had to do this before this way. I always simply set my > > gateway as name-server and I wonder what has changed the last > > week or so. > > Just imagine, I had to upgrade our school's gateway/proxy (which > > And that is where dhcpd comes in to play:D > > Just setup a DHCP-server and you are done.. Well, sorry to chime in here, but you're just suggesting a work around, not a real solution (which is to be running a caching named on the gateway machine). Uli, could you check if your named works as expected? The following applies to 5.x, adjust as necessary for 4.x: 1. does named indeed run on the gateway? gw# ps ax | grep named 277 ?? Ss 8:29.33 /usr/sbin/named -u bind -t /var/named 18582 ?? Ss 1:54.00 /usr/sbin/syslogd -l /var/run/log -l /var/named/var/r 81756 p1 S+ 0:00.02 grep named 2. does named listen on all relevant interfaces (sockstat -46)? You should get something like this: gw# sockstat -46 | grep bind bind named 277 20 udp4 192.168.254.1:53 *:* bind named 277 21 tcp4 192.168.254.1:53 *:* bind named 277 22 udp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* bind named 277 23 tcp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* bind named 277 24 udp4 *:59582 *:* bind named 277 25 tcp4 127.0.0.1:953 *:* (one random port must be open to the outside world, so named can get replies (?), other ports must be open to the inside net(s)) 3. using dig from the gateway, querying the local named, whan happens? 4. using dig from a host != gateway (on your local net), what happens? 5. Can you ping outside NUMERICAL IP address from your local net? % ping 66.94.229.254 (www.altavista.com) Regards, cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 21:42:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DB516A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:42:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vision-bsd.nl (kf-sdm-cb01-0127.dial.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.26.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F09143D2F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@vision-bsd.nl) Received: (qmail 56513 invoked by uid 1018); 27 Oct 2004 21:42:11 -0000 Received: from sam@vision-bsd.nl by freebsd.sam.intern by uid 1016 with qmail-scanner-1.22-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.75. spamassassin: 3.0.1. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.4):. Processed in 0.597045 secs); 27 Oct 2004 21:42:11 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: sam@vision-bsd.nl via freebsd.sam.intern X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.22-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.4):. Processed in 0.597045 secs Process 56504) Received: from sam-kamer.sam.intern (HELO SamKamer) (192.168.0.4) by vision-bsd.nl with SMTP; 27 Oct 2004 21:42:10 -0000 From: "Samuel Trommel" To: , "'Samuel Trommel'" Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:42:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20041027195632.GA1888@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcS8XwtB0s8TLn7DSJa2GgabI6m58AADiuow X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Message-ID: <109891333083556504@freebsd.sam.intern> Message-Id: <20041027214212.8F09143D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: 'Peter Ulrich Kruppa' cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:42:14 -0000 You should have read the whole thread first cpghost:) Greets, Samuel Trommel -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of cpghost@cordula.ws Sent: woensdag 27 oktober 2004 21:57 To: Samuel Trommel Cc: Peter Ulrich Kruppa; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ppp -nat broken??? On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:11:54PM +0200, Samuel Trommel wrote: > > > Primary nameserver 195.62.99.42 > > > Secundary nameserver 195.62.97.177 > > Yes, that works, thank you so far, but ... > > I never had to do this before this way. I always simply set my > > gateway as name-server and I wonder what has changed the last > > week or so. > > Just imagine, I had to upgrade our school's gateway/proxy (which > > And that is where dhcpd comes in to play:D > > Just setup a DHCP-server and you are done.. Well, sorry to chime in here, but you're just suggesting a work around, not a real solution (which is to be running a caching named on the gateway machine). Uli, could you check if your named works as expected? The following applies to 5.x, adjust as necessary for 4.x: 1. does named indeed run on the gateway? gw# ps ax | grep named 277 ?? Ss 8:29.33 /usr/sbin/named -u bind -t /var/named 18582 ?? Ss 1:54.00 /usr/sbin/syslogd -l /var/run/log -l /var/named/var/r 81756 p1 S+ 0:00.02 grep named 2. does named listen on all relevant interfaces (sockstat -46)? You should get something like this: gw# sockstat -46 | grep bind bind named 277 20 udp4 192.168.254.1:53 *:* bind named 277 21 tcp4 192.168.254.1:53 *:* bind named 277 22 udp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* bind named 277 23 tcp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* bind named 277 24 udp4 *:59582 *:* bind named 277 25 tcp4 127.0.0.1:953 *:* (one random port must be open to the outside world, so named can get replies (?), other ports must be open to the inside net(s)) 3. using dig from the gateway, querying the local named, whan happens? 4. using dig from a host != gateway (on your local net), what happens? 5. Can you ping outside NUMERICAL IP address from your local net? % ping 66.94.229.254 (www.altavista.com) Regards, cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 01:35:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE46D16A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 01:35:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out001.verizon.net (out001pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C34443D55 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 01:35:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from STACY ([68.175.9.97]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20041028013508.RSWN23519.out001.verizon.net@STACY>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:35:08 -0500 From: "Steve" To: "'Charles Sprickman'" Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:35:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20041027132604.J2588@shell.inch.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcS8SkJZ6v5j8sfgRguRchFRaFVHDAARBOdw X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [68.175.9.97] at Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:35:05 -0500 Message-Id: <20041028013508.RSWN23519.out001.verizon.net@STACY> cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 01:35:10 -0000 both -- Steve Rieger -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:26 PM To: Steve Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Steve wrote: > 3ware 9xxx series is much better than adaptec, Adaptec will not work > with dbsd without some tweaking, 3ware will work flawlessly. Are you running 4.x or 5.x? Thanks, Charles > > -- > Steve Rieger > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Charles > Sprickman > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:06 PM > To: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) > > Hi, > > I'm looking for some feedback on the following two SATA RAID controllers: > > http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata8000.asp (4 port) > http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/proddetail.html?sess=no&langu > age=En > glish+US&prodkey=AAR-2410SA&cat=%2fTechnology%2fRAID%2fSerial+ATA+RAID > > I'd love to hear from 5.x users with recent 8000-series controllers -- > I'm really leaning towards 5.x for this project as the release > schedule finally matches my build schedule. Both cards look good on > paper, and the pricing is similar. I'm mainly concerned about stability in real-world use. > > I've seen a number of recent positive comments from those using the > 3Ware under 4.x, but as someone with an older Escalade (sorry dmesg > doesn't report the model number), I'm a bit leery. Going to 4.10 > caused the thing to lock up under heavy disk load, apparently the > vendor-provided driver is worse than the old driver Mike Smith put together. > > I used the "Ask 3ware" link on their site to see what the party line > was on FreeBSD and this is what I got back: > > ====== > Charles, our support of FreeBSD is just as good as Windows and Linux > (which is great!). We have embedded support in the main kernel and an > open source driver that customers can compile to whichever kernel they > are using if needed. There is a precompiled driver for both 4.X and > 5.X versions on our website. We also have both an HTML based > management utility and CLI available. Yahoo is actually one of our > customers and helped promote the support for FreeBSD by 3ware. If you > have any other questions please let me know. Regards, > > http://www.3ware.com/support/OS-Support.asp > > David Graas > 3ware Corporate Sales Manager > ====== > > Thanks, > > Charles > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 02:44:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9519116A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:44:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261D643D31 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:44:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from bsdbox.farid-hajji.net (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1054B353; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:43:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:46:03 +0200 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: Samuel Trommel Message-ID: <20041028024603.GA3795@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> References: <20041027195632.GA1888@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> <20041027214212.8F09143D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041027214212.8F09143D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: 'Peter Ulrich Kruppa' cc: 'Samuel Trommel' cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ppp -nat broken??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:44:31 -0000 On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:42:08PM +0200, Samuel Trommel wrote: > You should have read the whole thread first cpghost:) Ah... yes! You're right. I've missed the first few entries. My mistake. Please disregard. Sorry, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 08:51:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A61A16A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:51:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ip212-226-164-78.adsl.kpnqwest.fi (ip212-226-164-93.adsl.kpnqwest.fi [212.226.164.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEF143D55 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:51:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mjraiha@ip212-226-164-78.adsl.kpnqwest.fi) Received: from ip212-226-164-78.adsl.kpnqwest.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i9S8pDoL016871; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:51:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mjraiha@ip212-226-164-78.adsl.kpnqwest.fi) Received: (from mjraiha@localhost)i9S8pCNk016870; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:51:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mjraiha) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:51:12 +0300 From: Marko Raiha To: secmgr Message-ID: <20041028085112.GA16832@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> <20041027100229.GB6391@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> <417FBA6F.7040406@jim-liesl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <417FBA6F.7040406@jim-liesl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Time-Zone: FI EET, 3 hours east of GMT. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.3-RC1 i386 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:51:15 -0000 Hi, On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:10:39AM -0600, secmgr wrote: > The reason is empirically derived. When I created a 7 disk raid 5 set > using "len 0" or all the space available, the raid set would be corrupt > after initializing. Every time. When I reserved back that extra > space, no corruption. > (freebsd 4.10-p3) There was a thread on this a few days ago. Thanks about pointing to this another thread. I read the thread and one thing is still a bit unclear. Do you mean by leaving 64 blocks unused to leave it unused at the beginning of disk before vinum partition (when doing partition to vinum by disklabeling freebsd slice) like this: # /dev/aacd2s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 143347932 0 unused 0 0 h: 143347868 64 vinum or somewhere in subdisk as you said? I guess that inadvertently not right terms were used ("subdisk" instead of "disk"), because terminology with vinum is a bit complicated. All documentations I have found says that only 16 block should be left unused at the beginning of the disk like this: # /dev/aacd2s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 143347932 0 unused 0 0 h: 143347916 16 vinum Regards, -- Marko Räihä From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 12:03:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D16E16A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:03:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1a-cta.bs2.com.br (srv1a-cta.bs2.com.br [200.203.183.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EF743D2D for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gpt@tirloni.org) Received: from localhost (srv1a-cta.bs2.com.br [200.203.183.35]) by srv1a-cta.bs2.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D2C1C6B45; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:03:19 -0300 (BRST) Received: from [192.168.0.97] (unknown [200.181.211.95]) by srv1a-cta.bs2.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2731C6940; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:03:19 -0300 (BRST) Message-ID: <4180DFEB.901@tirloni.org> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:02:51 -0300 From: "Giovanni P. Tirloni" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Sprickman References: <20041027040910.YUGS11892.out008.verizon.net@STACY> <20041027132604.J2588@shell.inch.com> In-Reply-To: <20041027132604.J2588@shell.inch.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:03:23 -0000 Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Steve wrote: > > >>3ware 9xxx series is much better than adaptec, >>Adaptec will not work with dbsd without some tweaking, 3ware will work >>flawlessly. > > > Are you running 4.x or 5.x? I've been testing 5.3-BETA7 with an Intel SE7210TP1-E motherboard. It has Adaptec HostRAID and I'm using two Seagate 160GB SATA drives. So far things are working as expected. I had to create the RAID 1 array with atacontrol before installing FreeBSD. Below is the output of diskinfo -t /dev/ar0 with the default GENERIC kernel. I've done no tuning yet. /dev/ar0 512 # sectorsize 160041853440 # mediasize in bytes (149G) 312581745 # mediasize in sectors 19457 # Cylinders according to firmware. 255 # Heads according to firmware. 63 # Sectors according to firmware. Seek times: Full stroke: 250 iter in 1.515921 sec = 6.064 msec Half stroke: 250 iter in 1.511172 sec = 6.045 msec Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 2.999155 sec = 5.998 msec Short forward: 400 iter in 2.200966 sec = 5.502 msec Short backward: 400 iter in 1.902325 sec = 4.756 msec Seq outer: 2048 iter in 0.482156 sec = 0.235 msec Seq inner: 2048 iter in 0.490824 sec = 0.240 msec Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 1.803000 sec = 56794 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 2.151312 sec = 47599 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 3.436182 sec = 29801 kbytes/sec -- Giovanni P. Tirloni From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 14:00:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9260316A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:00:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFB143D31 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:00:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olive@oban.frmug.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.frmug.org (Postfix/TLS) with ESMTP id 004A420F17 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:59:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lists.frmug.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (frmug.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28659-08 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:59:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lists.frmug.org (Postfix/TLS, from userid 66) id AF26720F38; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:59:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by weirdos.oban.frmug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043028C2D for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:59:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by weirdos.oban.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id C32FC8C28; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:59:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:59:22 +0200 From: Olivier Tharan To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041028135922.GR20452@weirdos.oban.frmug.org> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <200410271004.i9RA4NRp075870@util.inch.com> <20041027132435.C2588@shell.inch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041027132435.C2588@shell.inch.com> X-Attribution: Olive X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frmug.org Subject: Re: Best jail howto/FAQ X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:00:08 -0000 * Charles Sprickman (20041027 13:25): > I found that and many others, but I'm trying to find something a little > more current. I'd also like to see some discussion on keeping the jail > environment as small as needed, and some info on maintenance of the jail > environment. You might want to check the ports tree; there are at least 2-3 ports dealing with jail management. -- olive From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 21:39:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4A216A4CE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:39:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4831043D58 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:39:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from security@jim-liesl.org) Received: from smtp.jim-liesl.org ([68.71.52.28]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20041028213904.FUHB2497.mta9.adelphia.net@smtp.jim-liesl.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:39:04 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.jim-liesl.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2825E152B2; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:38:58 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <41816716.7040906@jim-liesl.org> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:39:34 -0600 From: secmgr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marko Raiha References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> <20041027100229.GB6391@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> <417FBA6F.7040406@jim-liesl.org> <20041028085112.GA16832@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> In-Reply-To: <20041028085112.GA16832@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:39:05 -0000 Marko Raiha wrote: >Hi, > >On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:10:39AM -0600, secmgr wrote: > > >>The reason is empirically derived. When I created a 7 disk raid 5 set >>using "len 0" or all the space available, the raid set would be corrupt >>after initializing. Every time. When I reserved back that extra >>space, no corruption. >>(freebsd 4.10-p3) There was a thread on this a few days ago. >> >> > >Thanks about pointing to this another thread. I read the thread and one >thing is still a bit unclear. Do you mean by leaving 64 blocks unused to >leave it unused at the beginning of disk before vinum partition (when >doing partition to vinum by disklabeling freebsd slice) like this: > ># /dev/aacd2s1: >8 partitions: ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > c: 143347932 0 unused 0 0 > h: 143347868 64 vinum > >or somewhere in subdisk as you said? I guess that inadvertently not >right terms were used ("subdisk" instead of "disk"), because terminology >with vinum is a bit complicated. > >All documentations I have found says that only 16 block should be left >unused at the beginning of the disk like this: > ># /dev/aacd2s1: >8 partitions: ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > c: 143347932 0 unused 0 0 > h: 143347916 16 vinum > >Regards, > > That probably would have worked too. My mistake was to clone the c partition entry, call it h, label it vinum, and use that From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 29 06:03:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC8716A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 06:03:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from titania.auscert.org.au (gw.auscert.org.au [203.5.112.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D3F43D2F for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 06:03:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (app [10.0.1.192])i9T60M6t084734 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:00:22 +1000 (EST) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by app.auscert.org.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9T63JiP072834 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:03:20 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <200410290603.i9T63JiP072834@app.auscert.org.au> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:03:19 +1000 Subject: php5 port compile problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 06:03:22 -0000 Hi, After a make update in /usr/src today (about an hour ago): ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1c6c): In function `.L163': : undefined reference to `res_ninit' ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1cd8): In function `.L163': : undefined reference to `res_nmkquery' ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1d0a): In function `.L163': : undefined reference to `res_nsend' ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1e9a): In function `.L163': : undefined reference to `res_nclose' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php5/work/php-5.0.2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php5. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall88483.0 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! lang/php5 (linker error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed Hope this is the right place to bring this up? joel -- Security Analyst | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland | WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: auscert@auscert.org.au From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 29 07:17:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C070816A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:17:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE7343D64 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:17:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9T7H8MK071924; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:47:09 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:47:06 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200410290603.i9T63JiP072834@app.auscert.org.au> In-Reply-To: <200410290603.i9T63JiP072834@app.auscert.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7279562.h3dROM1uJX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410291647.07480.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 () IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: php5 port compile problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:17:19 -0000 --nextPart7279562.h3dROM1uJX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:33, freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au wrote: > Hope this is the right place to bring this up? You should have CC'd the port maintainer (ale@FreeBSD.org). Also stating what version of FreeBSD would be good :) (ie what cvsup tag you used..) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart7279562.h3dROM1uJX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBge5z5ZPcIHs/zowRAr/fAJ9zKkq9XfMA287M2xkv2gWsPH83NQCgmRA0 aULe/uXyON/6tAtxqvz4YeE= =IYoR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7279562.h3dROM1uJX-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 29 07:52:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A343916A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:52:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9E2543D49 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:52:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 20129 invoked by uid 513); 29 Oct 2004 07:52:47 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.57675 secs); 29 Oct 2004 07:52:47 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 29 Oct 2004 07:52:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:52:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20041026141721.X816@pukruppa.net> Message-ID: <20041029090017.I827@pukruppa.net> References: <20041026141721.X816@pukruppa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: ppp -nat broken [solved] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:52:46 -0000 On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: > I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed > something new. First of all: My humble apologies to everybody for setting you on the wrong track. Indeed -nat works all-right. My problems were caused by recent changes of named and BIND. Big thanks for all hints which helped me to analyze this. For details look further down. > I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. > Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. From my > workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but domain > names won't be resolved ("unknown host"). > > These are my rc.conf lines: > > kern_securelevel_enable="NO" > inetd_enable="YES" > gateway_enable="YES" > named_enable="YES" > ppp_enable="YES" > ppp_mode="ddial" > ppp_nat="YES" > ppp_profile="my-profile" This configuration starts named as a local nameserver. I never had to do anything else. This stopped working "out of the box" some time ago. From /usr/src/UPDATING (20040928, 20040925) I learn that named and BIND have changed. I did the respective changes and edited two entries in /var/named/etc/named/named.conf 1) I commented listen-on {127.0.0.1;}; 2) I put my two nameserver IPs (from /etc/resolv.conf) into forwarders { 195.62.99.42; 195.62.97.177; }; After restarting named everything worked as before: my clients accept my gateway's IP as gateway *and* nameserver. Thanks and regards, Uli. +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 29 08:34:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AEC16A4CE; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:34:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4776743D2F; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:34:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394BB85606; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:04:24 +0930 (CST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id B4D824AC3F; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:37:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:37:56 +0200 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: secmgr , FreeBSD Release Engineering Team Message-ID: <20041028153756.GB1195@eucla.lemis.com> References: <02f201c4ba91$f9f95db0$33017f80@psique> <1098725440.5103.4.camel@sp4.cs.ucdavis.edu> <417D604D.4090800@jim-liesl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <417D604D.4090800@jim-liesl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:34:34 -0000 On Monday, 25 October 2004 at 14:21:33 -0600, secmgr wrote: > Andrew Konstantinov wrote: > >> On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 05:55, Oliver Torres Delgado wrote: >> >> >>> I have freebsd 5.3 rc1 installed perfectly, i configure vinum with the >>> handbook and all work perfect >>> but when try run vinum with rc.conf there display the error: >>> >>> panic: unmount: dangling vnode >>> ... >> >> Just like me, you should have checked the mailing list archive first. >> Here is a nice solution: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-August/035547.html > > thanks, I appreciate the pointer. That being said, if this is a "KNOWN" > problem (as far back as August) how come no mention in either the > release notes OR errata. Good question. > I like and use FreeBSD for it's stability, but at this point in > time, I've got broken vinum-classic (with workarounds) raid5 in 4.10 > and raid 1 in 5.3-stable. Both of these installed per current > documentation. I haven't logged bug reports becasue it seems like > everything is moving to gvinum, and they'd probably just end up > closed out as FINV A bit of background: we know that 'gvinum' will replace Vinum; the original intention had been to do it seamlessly, but for various reasons that did happen. Then we decided that we should leave them both in the tree until gvinum had the full functionality of Vinum. It's beginning to look like that's a bad idea. Lukas is (understandably) working only on gvinum, and since I know it's nearly there, I'm not going to do any further work on Vinum in FreeBSD 5. Given the problems, I'd suggest that we yank it. I'm copying the release engineering team. Re, what do you think? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 29 10:38:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C3216A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:38:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6292E43D1F for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:38:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vinref@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so576304wri for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 03:38:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hWKptkybdt26ELgaUCNzM8StIfW4wfKIKHHJn6k5Fe7/wO769RHqeuC2JLeHt1VXAk22YftjvJbeivVeFnVtSe1snjt3NMnGwdlZBFXBWizd4nGPQcFs1iiQ2L1K9+N9ul4YbZ7qr/+P4xAvnD3ateMrBd820jJ2DBqNQ6Fw9Jw= Received: by 10.38.79.68 with SMTP id c68mr2683553rnb; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 03:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.126.4 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 03:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d4c86890410290338258e1178@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:38:16 +1000 From: Vince Refiti To: FreeBSD-Stable Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Fetchyahoo does not get message IDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vince Refiti List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:38:23 -0000 Greetings I would like some help with this. I am trying to use fetchyahoo to get mail from Yahoo. It logs in OK, but never gets the message IDs and so does not download any email messges. I am using the latest version, fetchyahoo-2.8.6, all p5 mods are up-to-date as of a cvsup done on 29-Oct-2004, on a FBSD4.10,p3 machine. The fetchyahoo output is: Logging in securely via SSL as xxx on Fri Oct 29 19:54:49 2004 You are using 5% of your 100.0MB limit. Country Code 'au' not found. We will try the translation for 'us'. Successfully logged in as xxx. Country code : au Folder: Inbox Version: 2.8.6 Only retrieving new messages Getting Message ID(s) for message(s) 1 - 26. Got 0 Message IDs Finished downloading 0 messages. 0 message(s) have been deleted. Logged out. My .fetchyahoorc is as follows: # FetchYahoo configuration file # values in this file override values specified in the script itself # but are in turn overridden by values specified on the commandline # lines starting with # are ignored # do NOT use any quotes around values # values can include whitespace, but not at the end. ###### SHOULD configure these ###### username = xxx # this can be a password or an md5_hex hashed password password = xxx # set this to 0 to turn off HTTPS and login insecurely via plaintext instead use-https = 1 ###### mail spool, mbox file and procmail configs ###### # set use-spool to 0 to disable outputting to a file/filter use-spool = 1 # if spoolName ends with a / we output in maildir format to that directory spool = /home/xxx/Mail/Inbox # spool-mode must be either append, pipe or overwrite # use pipe for procmail or other filter and append for a normal spool # ignored if spoolName is a maildir directory spool-mode = append ###### proxy configuration ###### # set use-proxy to 1 to enable use of a web proxy use-proxy = 0 proxy-host = proxy.example.com proxy-port = 80 proxy-username = proxyAuthenicationUserName proxy-password = proxyAuthenicationPassword ###### IMAP configuration ###### # set use-imap to 1 to enable output to an IMAP mailbox use-imap = 0 imap-host = imap.example.com imap-port = 143 imap-username = imap-user-name imap-password = imap-password imap-mailbox = INBOX ###### mail forwarding configuration ###### # set use-forward to 1 to enable mail forwarding use-forward = 0 # set mail-host to your smtp outgoing mail server mail-host = outgoing.example.com # the e-mail addresses you want mail forwarded to send-to = me@example.com , me2@example.com # the e-mail address used as the from address, this should probably be at the # same ISP as the outgoing smtp mailhost specified above send-from = me@example.com # set this to 1 if you want to use sendmail to deliver messages use-sendmail = 0 # set this to the location of your sendmail binary if you set the above to 1 sendmail = /usr/sbin/sendmail ###### other configuration ###### # IMPORTANT Yahoo gives trouble when downloading over 100 messages at a time # Setting this to more than 100 (or 0 for unlimited) may cause problems. # max number of messages to download in one go max-messages = 100 # set no-download to 1 to to not download messages # e.g. if this conf file is for removing Bulk Folder msgs without downloading no-download = 0 # set new-messages-only to 1 to download only unread messages new-messages-only = 1 # set this to N to not download messages larger than N kb # setting this to 0 turns off this check max-size = 0 # set no-delete to 1 to not delete messages after dowloading # i.e. they will be left on Yahoo!'s mail servers no-delete = 0 # set this to the folder you want to download from eg Bulk folder = Inbox # set quiet to 1 to not output any regular (non-error) messages quiet = 0 # set this to 1 to retrieve messages from external mailboxes too get-external = 0 # set no-errors to 1 to not output any error messages no-errors = 0 # list the messages seen in the mail folder list-messages = 1 # set either of these to 1 to enable mail checking before or after downloading msgs empty-trash-after = 0 empty-trash-before = 0 # set this to 1 to enable emptying the Bulk folder before fetching messages empty-bulk = 0 # if this is 0, the program runs once and terminates # Otherwise this is the number of minutes between successive mail checks. repeat-interval = 0 # to leave messages as unread on the server, set this to 1 # this is only useful if no-delete is also set to 1 leave-unread = 0 # if you are using a program/filter which does not expect a From_ line # at the start of the message, set this to 1 no-from-line = 0 # set logout to 1 to make fetchyahoo logout after downloading messages logout = 1 # set status-only to 1 to only get the number of messages status-only = 0 # set warning-level to 0 to not warn # if >0, will print a warning if mailbox is >= N% full warning-level = 0 Thank you in advance Vince From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 29 10:54:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA9916A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:54:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com (sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com [193.81.94.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6053043D2F for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:54:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from k.joch@kmjeuro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.30] (adsl.sbg.kmjeuro.com [62.99.198.46]) (authenticated bits=0)i9TAsmoU033086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:54:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from k.joch@kmjeuro.com) Message-ID: <41822173.3030905@kmjeuro.com> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:54:43 +0200 From: "Karl M. Joch" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CTS-CTSTZS-Mailserver-Information: please visit www.ctseuro.com for further instructions. Protected by www.ctseuro.com X-CTS-CTSTZS-Mailserver: Found to be clean X-CTS-CTSTZS-Mailserver-From: k.joch@kmjeuro.com Subject: 5.2.1 - Dolphin 4036 4 port serial? (port 3/4 not recogniced) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:54:57 -0000 Hello, I built in a card which is identified as Dolphin 4036. This card has 4 serial ports (Sun Chip) and looking at the Dolphin Webpage there is a similiar product named FastPCI 4056. The card is recogniced and sio4 and sio5 are found and works correct. But there is no way to get sio6 and 7 (3rd/4th port on the card) working. Any hints how to add this card to pucdata would be very helpful. -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Karl M. Joch ################ ## dmesg.boot ## FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p6 #1: Fri Oct 29 12:19:20 CEST 2004 Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0a50000. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko" at 0xc0a50244. Preloaded splash_image_data "/boot/cts.bmp" at 0xc0a502f4. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2788.69-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebf9ff real memory = 528482304 (504 MB) avail memory = 503685120 (480 MB) Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 Using $PIR table, 9 entries at 0xc00f78c0 pcib0: at pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci_cfgintr: 0:9 INTA BIOS irq 10 pci_cfgintr: 0:11 INTA BIOS irq 11 pci_cfgintr: 0:13 INTA BIOS irq 5 pci_cfgintr: 0:15 INTA BIOS irq 5 pci_cfgintr: 0:17 INTA BIOS irq 5 agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe3ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 2.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xff00-0xff0f at device 2.5 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata0: [MPSAFE] ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ata1: [MPSAFE] puc0: port 0xd400-0xd40f,0xd800-0xd81f irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci0 sio4: on puc0 sio4: type 16550A sio4: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode sio5: on puc0 sio5: type 16550A sio5: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode ahc0: port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 0xdfffb000-0xdfffbfff irq 11 at device 11.0 on pci0 aic7870: Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/253 SCBs rl0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xdfffaf00-0xdfffafff irq 5 at device 13.0 on pci0 rl0: Ethernet address: 00:40:95:32:55:e7 miibus0: on rl0 rlphy0: on miibus0 rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto rl1: port 0xcc00-0xccff mem 0xdfffae00-0xdfffaeff irq 5 at device 15.0 on pci0 rl1: Ethernet address: 00:40:95:30:b2:2d miibus1: on rl1 rlphy1: on miibus1 rlphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto rl2: port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xdfffad00-0xdfffadff irq 5 at device 17.0 on pci0 rl2: Ethernet address: 00:40:95:30:7e:33 miibus2: on rl2 rlphy2: on miibus2 rlphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto orm0: