From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 18:30:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652CC16A420 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1EC43D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:30:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77IUOxs061989 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:30:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j77IUOWG061986; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:30:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:30:24 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200508071830.j77IUOWG061986@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Andreas Eder Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EF416A42D for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:27:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [216.136.204.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A23A43ED3 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:06:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j77I6bu2030110 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:06:37 GMT (envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j77I6b20030109; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:06:37 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <200508071806.j77I6b20030109@www.freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:06:37 GMT From: Andreas Eder To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-2.3 Cc: Subject: amd64/84652: kbdmap -r dumps core X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:30:25 -0000 >Number: 84652 >Category: amd64 >Synopsis: kbdmap -r dumps core >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-amd64 >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Aug 07 18:30:21 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Andreas Eder >Release: 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD staffa.eder.de 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun Jul 31 00:12:59 CEST 2005 root@staffa.eder.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STAFFA amd64 >Description: kbdmap -r gets a segmentation fault and dumps core gdb /usr/sbin/kbdmap kbdmap.core prints out Core was generated by `kbdmap'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.5 Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x00000008006e0fb3 in strdup () from /lib/libc.so.5 >How-To-Repeat: simply repeat the program invocation >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 01:07:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47E016A42C for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:07:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from runfreebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web52504.mail.yahoo.com (web52504.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EADDE43DF3 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 00:42:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from runfreebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 27041 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Aug 2005 00:42:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PyyozHId1nsQ9K3nB9rZLk+iY6WU9zc52eeUZ6Vw7Rf8tod6exjLL6ofi2HeVe6btNIqOOKmBx6gIIZLrVqf4HpZFSEAowLRYQ50Vz0ZoB9Vw+WVNOO1/DDhY8FELoxIRML2VOEu1l4xKk9AP8ThPzE0W4UhcH2y0zeH9s3W1LU= ; Message-ID: <20050808004213.27039.qmail@web52504.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.204.157.14] by web52504.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:42:13 PDT Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:42:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Schoolcraft To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: GAIM or AIM in 5.4 "amd64" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 01:07:19 -0000 Hello Family, I'm trying to get either GAIM or AIM to work on my 5.4 "amd64" to no avail. It works on my 5.4 "i386" and I was wondering if anyone can help, here is my "ports" failure message for GAIM. AIM reports only being ported to i386. ##################### [root@liam /usr/ports/net/gaim]-> make install clean ===> gaim-1.2.1 has known vulnerabilities: => gaim -- Yahoo! remote crash vulnerability. Reference: => gaim -- MSN Remote DoS vulnerability. Reference: => gaim -- MSN remote DoS vulnerability. Reference: => gaim -- remote crash on some protocols. Reference: => Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/gaim. ##################### Thanks in advance. ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 01:36:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C5116A41F for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sdodson@sdodson.com) Received: from mxo1.broadbandsupport.net (mxo1.broadbandsupport.net [209.55.3.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595A943D55 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:36:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sdodson@sdodson.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (host-12-173-142-112.nctv.com [12.173.142.112]) by mxo1.broadbandsupport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A07533411C; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:36:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42F6B733.3030603@sdodson.com> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:36:51 -0400 From: Scott Dodson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.0+ (Windows/20050806) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Schoolcraft , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <20050808004213.27039.qmail@web52504.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050808004213.27039.qmail@web52504.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-broadbandsupportnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-broadbandsupportnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-broadbandsupportnet-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss X-broadbandsupportnet-MailScanner-From: sdodson@sdodson.com Cc: Subject: Re: GAIM or AIM in 5.4 "amd64" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 01:36:57 -0000 Bill Schoolcraft wrote: > Hello Family, > > I'm trying to get either GAIM or AIM to work on my 5.4 "amd64" to no > avail. It works on my 5.4 "i386" and I was wondering if anyone can > help, here is my "ports" failure message for GAIM. AIM reports only > being ported to i386. > > ##################### > > [root@liam /usr/ports/net/gaim]-> make install clean > > ===> gaim-1.2.1 has known vulnerabilities: You need to update your ports tree. Easiest way is cvsup : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html -- Scott From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 09:17:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3862016A41F for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:17:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gaetan.ronsmans@skynet.be) Received: from outmx010.isp.belgacom.be (outmx010.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF1E43D45 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:17:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gaetan.ronsmans@skynet.be) Received: from outmx010.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx010.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j789HYVT004524 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:17:34 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from maisonportable (139-28.240.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.240.28.139]) by outmx010.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j789HLoe004350 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:17:27 +0200 (envelope-from ) Message-Id: <200508080917.j789HLoe004350@outmx010.isp.belgacom.be> From: "Gaetan Ronsmans" To: Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:17:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcWb+dmzUEmpTDdQR928QHYlLqn/Ew== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: error message: "NOTE: BIOS IS NOT INSTALLED" X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:17:49 -0000 Hello, I was looking for information because I also have some trouble with my computer when I red your message about the note BIOS IS NOT INSTALLED. I also have this message when I start my computer. Nevertheless windows is launched normally. My problem is that my computer is highly unstable ! After about ten minutes, it is stuck and I can't do anything, my mouse and keyboard are stuck too. Does anyone already encountered such a problem, can anyone help me ? thanks From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 11:01:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AA216A420 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:01:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B12C43D46 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:01:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j78B1nwJ006746 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:01:49 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j78B1mcs006740 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:01:48 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:01:48 GMT Message-Id: <200508081101.j78B1mcs006740@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:01:50 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/10/27] amd64/73211 amd64 FAST_IPSEC broken on amd64 1 problem total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/11/26] amd64/59714 amd64 device timeout and ad0: WARNING - WRITE_D o [2004/07/28] amd64/69704 amd64 ext2/ext3 unstable in amd64 o [2004/07/28] amd64/69707 amd64 IPC32 dont work OK in amd64 FreeBSD o [2004/09/07] amd64/71471 amd64 Can not install 5.3beta3/amd64 on IBM eSe o [2004/10/28] amd64/73252 amd64 ad6: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was see o [2004/10/30] amd64/73322 amd64 unarchiving /etc to msdos fs locks up amd o [2004/11/01] amd64/73369 amd64 on-board firewire unreliable with Asus K8 o [2004/11/07] amd64/73650 amd64 5.3-release panics on boot o [2004/11/10] amd64/73775 amd64 Kernel panic (trap 12) when booting with o [2004/11/16] amd64/74014 amd64 5.3-RELEASE-AMD64 freezes on boot during o [2004/12/05] amd64/74747 amd64 System panic on shutdown when process wil o [2004/12/18] amd64/75209 amd64 5.3-Release panics on attempted boot from o [2004/12/23] amd64/75417 amd64 ACPI: SATA Hard-disk o [2005/01/12] amd64/76136 amd64 system halts before reboot o [2005/01/17] amd64/76336 amd64 racoon/setkey -D cases instant "Fatal Tra o [2005/02/02] amd64/77011 amd64 consisten 5.3-p5 make crash on installwor o [2005/02/04] amd64/77101 amd64 Please include ULi M1689 LAN, SATA, and A o [2005/02/17] amd64/77629 amd64 aMule hardlocks AMD64 system o [2005/02/23] amd64/77949 amd64 Pb boot FreeBSD 64 o [2005/03/04] amd64/78406 amd64 [panic]AMD64 w/ SCSI: issue 'rm -r /usr/p o [2005/03/07] amd64/78558 amd64 installation o [2005/03/14] amd64/78848 amd64 sis driver on FreeBSD 5.x does not work o o [2005/04/12] amd64/79813 amd64 Will not install/run on amd64 nForce 4 pl o [2005/04/19] amd64/80114 amd64 kldload snd_ich causes interrupt storm wh o [2005/05/06] amd64/80691 amd64 amd64 kernel hangs on load o [2005/05/14] amd64/81037 amd64 SATA problem o [2005/05/19] amd64/81272 amd64 JDK 1.5 port doesn't build. o [2005/05/20] amd64/81325 amd64 KLD if_ath.ko: depends on ath_hal - not a o [2005/05/28] amd64/81602 amd64 SATA crashes with parallel pcm access o [2005/06/09] amd64/82071 amd64 incorrect -march's parameter to build 32b o [2005/06/19] amd64/82425 amd64 fxp0: device timeout, fxp interface dies o [2005/06/23] amd64/82555 amd64 Kernel Panic - after i connect to my "amd o [2005/07/05] amd64/83005 amd64 Memory Occupied during installation of th o [2005/07/25] amd64/84027 amd64 if_nve gets stuck 34 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/01/11] amd64/61209 amd64 ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range o [2004/02/21] amd64/63188 amd64 ti(4) broken on amd64 o [2004/07/28] amd64/69705 amd64 IPC problem (msq_queues) o [2004/07/28] amd64/69709 amd64 ACPI enabled then floppy don't work (5.2. o [2004/08/15] amd64/70500 amd64 bge driver for 3Com 3C996B on amd64 preve o [2004/12/02] amd64/74608 amd64 mpt hangs 5 minutes when booting o [2004/12/07] amd64/74811 amd64 df, nfs mount, negative Avail -> 32/64-bi o [2004/12/13] ports/75015 amd64 cvsup on amd64 with runsocks (socks5) cor o [2005/03/17] amd64/78954 amd64 kerberos 5 failed to build o [2005/05/16] amd64/81089 amd64 FreeBSD 5.4 released version can not use o [2005/06/12] amd64/82178 amd64 missing 32bit subsystem o [2005/06/18] amd64/82380 amd64 buildworld error in libc o [2005/06/18] amd64/82399 amd64 MSI K8N Neo4 Platinium is not supported o [2005/06/24] amd64/82599 amd64 ports/misc/mtx wont compile on amd64 o [2005/07/20] amd64/83806 amd64 Can not comple /usr/src/lib/msun/amd64/fe o [2005/08/07] amd64/84652 amd64 kbdmap -r dumps core 16 problems total. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 12:29:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236C316A41F; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:29:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A207143D46; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:29:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2c.sentex.ca [64.7.153.30]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j78CS6kW045025; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:28:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j78CT0BL088469; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:29:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 187507304D; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:29:00 -0400 (EDT) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20050808122900.187507304D@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:29:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on clamscanner4 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 12:29:02 -0000 TB --- 2005-08-08 10:56:46 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-08-08 10:56:46 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2005-08-08 10:56:46 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-08-08 10:57:20 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-08-08 10:57:20 - cd /tinderbox/HEAD/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2005-08-08 10:57:20 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2005-08-08 11:03:11 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2005-08-08 11:03:11 - cd /src TB --- 2005-08-08 11:03:11 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything >>> stage 5.1: building 32 bit shim libraries [...] /src/lib/libedit/term.c:1205: error: called object is not a function /src/lib/libedit/term.c:1213: error: called object is not a function In file included from editline.c:20: /src/lib/libedit/tty.c: In function `tty_bind_char': /src/lib/libedit/tty.c:868: error: called object is not a function /src/lib/libedit/tty.c:870: error: called object is not a function /src/lib/libedit/tty.c:874: error: called object is not a function /src/lib/libedit/tty.c:876: error: called object is not a function *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/lib/libedit. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2005-08-08 12:28:59 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2005-08-08 12:28:59 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2005-08-08 12:28:59 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 18:09:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5660716A41F; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 18:09:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from viefep14-int.chello.at (viefep14-int.chello.at [213.46.255.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A0B43D45; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 18:09:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26]) by viefep14-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050808180909.MSSV26692.viefep14-int.chello.at@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:09:09 +0200 Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2BA526A; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:09:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:09:06 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: current@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050808180905.GE560@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org References: <20050808122900.187507304D@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050808122900.187507304D@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:09:13 -0000 On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 08:29:00AM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > /src/lib/libedit/term.c:1205: error: called object is not a function Sorry, should be fixed. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 20:00:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E8B16A41F for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:00:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ghelmer@palisadesys.com) Received: from magellan.palisadesys.com (magellan.palisadesys.com [192.188.162.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6270A43D53 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ghelmer@palisadesys.com) Received: from [172.16.1.108] (cetus.palisadesys.com [192.188.162.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by magellan.palisadesys.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j78K0nxJ004924 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:00:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ghelmer@palisadesys.com) Message-ID: <42F7B9F1.4090004@palisadesys.com> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 15:00:49 -0500 From: Guy Helmer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Palisade-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Palisade-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: ghelmer@palisadesys.com Subject: Booting a FreeBSD 5.4 amd64 kernel on root filesystem populated with i386 binaries X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 20:00:56 -0000 Should it be possible to boot a FreeBSD 5.4 amd64 kernel (built with IA32 compatibility) using a root filesystem that contains i386 binaries? I'm trying to upgrade systems in-place where the first step is installing an amd64 kernel, /sbin/init, /libexec/ld-elf32.so.1 and populating /lib32 with a copy of the 32-bit libraries, and then rebooting. However, after the kernel boots, it gives a signal 10 when trying to invoke /bin/sh to run /etc/rc. Am I way off base trying to do this? It seems like it should work but I'm missing something that isn't easy to diagnose. Do I need to replace /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 with an amd64 binary also? Thanks for any help, Guy -- Guy Helmer, Ph.D. Principal System Architect Palisade Systems, Inc. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 20:13:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96DF16A41F for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C26243D46 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j78KDsCr029546; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:13:54 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j78KDsvC029545; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:13:54 -0700 Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:13:54 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Guy Helmer Message-ID: <20050808201354.GH1936@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <42F7B9F1.4090004@palisadesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42F7B9F1.4090004@palisadesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting a FreeBSD 5.4 amd64 kernel on root filesystem populated with i386 binaries X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 20:13:55 -0000 On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:00:49PM -0500, Guy Helmer wrote: > Should it be possible to boot a FreeBSD 5.4 amd64 kernel (built with > IA32 compatibility) using a root filesystem that contains i386 > binaries? I'm trying to upgrade systems in-place where the first step > is installing an amd64 kernel, /sbin/init, /libexec/ld-elf32.so.1 and > populating /lib32 with a copy of the 32-bit libraries, and then > rebooting. However, after the kernel boots, it gives a signal 10 when > trying to invoke /bin/sh to run /etc/rc. > > Am I way off base trying to do this? It seems like it should work but > I'm missing something that isn't easy to diagnose. Do I need to replace > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 with an amd64 binary also? I'm pretty sure it's not supported under 5.x. The i386 support just isn't good enough. I'm not sure about 6.x. Support is supposed to be a lot better there, but I don't recall any word of people testing this so at that point I suspect not. I would suspect a jailed root will work before a real root file system does. -- Brooks From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 12:32:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA9116A41F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:32:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com) Received: from aragon.netaktiv.com (ns3.netaktiv.com [62.212.103.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB9843D45 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:32:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aragon.netaktiv.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDF8426B9 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:32:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aragon.netaktiv.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aragon [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04728-25 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:31:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from laika (laika [172.21.0.3]) by aragon.netaktiv.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487BC426B6 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:31:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Mialon Pierre-Gilles Organization: NetAktiv To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:31:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508091431.56773.pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at aragon.netaktiv.com Subject: No dual cpu on S 2882 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:32:08 -0000 I try to use AMD64 on a heavy loaded web server, it always crashes when the load grow up, with no signal, it just reboot... What can I do to see it working ? Should I change to FreeBSD i386 ? The only issue I found was to use only one cpu ... But this server needs both of them to work correctly ... Thanks !!!! Hardware configuration : TYAN K8 S 2882 4 X 512 M RAM ECC KINGSTON DDR 400 2 X opteron 248 4 X DD SATA MAXTOR (RAID 5) 1 X 3ware Storage Controller ( twe ) (ACPI 2.0 in the BIOS I make some test without it ... ) Software configuration : FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE (AMD64) apache mysql postfix Here is my kernel conf, line preceeding by ** I try with and without the option : machine amd64 cpu HAMMER ident PERI options SMP ** device mptable # Optional MPSPEC mptable support ** options NO_MIXED_MODE # Disable use of mixed mode FIXME ** options NET_WITH_GIANT # Disable the use of SMP in network options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE # Include this file in kernel options SCHED_ULE # Improved scheduler options INET # InterNETworking options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev ** options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive. ** device atpic # 8259A compatability ** device acpi device isa device pci device fdc device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device ataraid # ATA RAID drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) device da # Direct Access (disks) device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) device twe # 3ware ATA RAID device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support device sc device agp # support several AGP chipsets device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports device ppc device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device miibus # MII bus support device bge # Broadcom BCM570xx Gigabit Ethernet device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) device loop # Network loopback device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices device io # I/O device device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) device md # Memory "disks" device bpf # Berkeley packet filter Here is the output of dmesg (with and without acpi enable): Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #7: Tue Aug 9 08:55:27 CEST 2005 MPTable: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 248 (2190.95-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xf5a Stepping = 10 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500800 real memory = 2147418112 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2065117184 (1969 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Assuming intbase of 0 ioapic1: Assuming intbase of 24 ioapic2: Assuming intbase of 28 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-27 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 28-31 on motherboard cpu0 on motherboard cpu1 on motherboard pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib1 pci3: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pci3: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) atapci0: port 0xa880-0xa88f,0xac00-0xac03,0xb800-0xb807,0xb880-0xb883,0xbc00-0xbc07 mem 0xfeafec00-0xfeafefff irq 19 at device 5.0 on pci3 ata2: channel #0 on atapci0 ata3: channel #1 on atapci0 ata4: channel #2 on atapci0 ata5: channel #3 on atapci0 pci3: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) fxp0: port 0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xfeaa0000-0xfeabffff,0xfeafb000-0xfeafbfff irq 18 at device 8.0 on pci3 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:2a:3c:b1 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci1 ata1: channel #1 on atapci1 pci0: at device 7.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 bge0: mem 0xfc8b0000-0xfc8bffff,0xfc8c0000-0xfc8cffff irq 24 at device 9.0 on pci2 miibus1: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus1 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:2a:51:16 bge1: mem 0xfc8e0000-0xfc8effff,0xfc8f0000-0xfc8fffff irq 25 at device 9.1 on pci2 miibus2: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus2 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:2a:51:17 pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib3 twe0: <3ware Storage Controller. Driver version 1.50.01.002> port 0x8c00-0x8c0f mem 0xfb800000-0xfbffffff irq 28 at device 3.0 on pci1 twe0: 4 ports, Firmware FE8S 1.05.00.068, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.048 pci0: at device 11.1 (no driver attached) orm0: at iomem 0xc8000-0xc8fff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x64,0x60 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4 twed0: on twe0 twed0: 235597MB (482503296 sectors) SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/twed0s1a ---->>><<<--------->>><<<--------->>><<<--------->>><<<--------->>><<<--------->>><<<--------->>><<<----- Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #8: Tue Aug 9 12:33:05 CEST 2005 ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 248 (2190.87-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xf5a Stepping = 10 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500800 real memory = 2147418112 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2064723968 (1969 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-27 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 28-31 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib1 pci3: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pci3: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) atapci0: port 0xa880-0xa88f,0xac00-0xac03,0xb800-0xb807,0xb880-0xb883,0xbc00-0xbc07 mem 0xfeafec00-0xfeafefff irq 19 at device 5.0 on pci3 ata2: channel #0 on atapci0 ata3: channel #1 on atapci0 ata4: channel #2 on atapci0 ata5: channel #3 on atapci0 pci3: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) fxp0: port 0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xfeaa0000-0xfeabffff,0xfeafb000-0xfeafbfff irq 18 at device 8.0 on pci3 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:2a:3c:b1 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci1 ata1: channel #1 on atapci1 pci0: at device 7.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 bge0: mem 0xfc8b0000-0xfc8bffff,0xfc8c0000-0xfc8cffff irq 24 at device 9.0 on pci2 miibus1: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus1 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:2a:51:16 bge1: mem 0xfc8e0000-0xfc8effff,0xfc8f0000-0xfc8fffff irq 25 at device 9.1 on pci2 miibus2: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus2 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:2a:51:17 pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib3 twe0: <3ware Storage Controller. Driver version 1.50.01.002> port 0x8c00-0x8c0f mem 0xfb800000-0xfbffffff irq 28 at device 3.0 on pci1 twe0: 4 ports, Firmware FE8S 1.05.00.068, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.048 pci0: at device 11.1 (no driver attached) acpi_button0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 orm0: at iomem 0xc8000-0xc8fff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4 twed0: on twe0 twed0: 235597MB (482503296 sectors) SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/twed0s1a -- Pierre-Gilles Mialon mialon@netaktiv.com From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 12:48:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2758216A41F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mortis.over-yonder.net (adsl-152-70-24.jan.bellsouth.net [70.152.70.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F9F43D55 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: by mortis.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3055020F60; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:47:57 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:47:56 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20050809124756.GA27425@over-yonder.net> References: <42F7B9F1.4090004@palisadesys.com> <20050808201354.GH1936@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050808201354.GH1936@odin.ac.hmc.edu> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i-fullermd.2 Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting a FreeBSD 5.4 amd64 kernel on root filesystem populated with i386 binaries X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:48:00 -0000 On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:13:54PM -0700 I heard the voice of Brooks Davis, and lo! it spake thus: > > I'm pretty sure it's not supported under 5.x. The i386 support just > isn't good enough. I'm not sure about 6.x. Support is supposed to > be a lot better there, but I don't recall any word of people testing > this so at that point I suspect not. I would suspect a jailed root > will work before a real root file system does. When I did a i386->amd64 conversion (because amd64 had no boot floppies *pout*), I temporarily hijacked my swap partition as a new temporary root. DESTDIR'd installworld, reboot, fiddle around in the loader to boot off the new partition, then do another DESTDIR installworld onto the real root and it was done. I couldn't get the i386 world to load right with the amd64 kernel; it seemed to bomb right around firing up init. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 13:22:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9897416A41F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:22:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5C343D5A for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:22:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kometen@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so1219562wra for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 06:22:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WP6onOm8xMzKaTLLrcwnlyUJcE1YWNRzSoPJG9GRREb1MpV2jqeKZxAhQap81a6Oam0zyLBYF6rxABJ85BLJFz54e+LevtPuknFGGfo/ZtzoEu3cH0F7hsqCTjQSoX7eZXXO02pIUmKR/04wvBPzjiFkgPJytcRS2Nx5yD2IRo8= Received: by 10.54.36.64 with SMTP id j64mr5505370wrj; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 06:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.144.11 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 06:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:22:23 +0200 From: Claus Guttesen To: Mialon Pierre-Gilles In-Reply-To: <200508091431.56773.pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200508091431.56773.pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No dual cpu on S 2882 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:22:24 -0000 > I try to use AMD64 on a heavy loaded web server, it always crashe= s when the > load grow up, with no signal, it just reboot... >=20 > What can I do to see it working ? Should I change to FreeBSD i386= ? The only > issue I found was to use only one cpu ... But this server needs both of = them > to work correctly ... >=20 > options SCHED_ULE # Improved scheduler Change this line to SCHED_4BSD instead. regards Claus From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 16:07:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD57816A41F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:07:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7598B43D46 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:07:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68813B85A for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) In-Reply-To: <200508091431.56773.pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com> References: <200508091431.56773.pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2E16A512-D797-4D24-9AF1-22BFF42E4841@khera.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vivek Khera Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:07:13 -0400 To: freebsd-amd64 List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Subject: Re: No dual cpu on S 2882 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:07:19 -0000 On Aug 9, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Mialon Pierre-Gilles wrote: > I try to use AMD64 on a heavy loaded web server, it always > crashes when the > load grow up, with no signal, it just reboot... > if changing the scheduler doesn't work, try disabling the onboard BGE in favor of an add-in Intel NIC (preferably the em driver). On my S2881 boards this was necessary for stability with 5.4-RELEASE. Vivek Khera, Ph.D. +1-301-869-4449 x806 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 17:32:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B9716A41F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:32:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3DE43D45 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:32:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67352A8FA for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:32:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B00E2B3 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:32:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j79HW4F3003543; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:32:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j79HVx7P003538; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:31:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Authentication-Warning: overcee.wemm.org: peter set sender to peter@wemm.org using -f From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:31:58 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <42F7B9F1.4090004@palisadesys.com> <20050808201354.GH1936@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050808201354.GH1936@odin.ac.hmc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508091031.59055.peter@wemm.org> Cc: Subject: Re: Booting a FreeBSD 5.4 amd64 kernel on root filesystem populated with i386 binaries X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:32:06 -0000 On Monday 08 August 2005 01:13 pm, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:00:49PM -0500, Guy Helmer wrote: > > Should it be possible to boot a FreeBSD 5.4 amd64 kernel (built > > with IA32 compatibility) using a root filesystem that contains i386 > > binaries? I'm trying to upgrade systems in-place where the first > > step is installing an amd64 kernel, /sbin/init, > > /libexec/ld-elf32.so.1 and populating /lib32 with a copy of the > > 32-bit libraries, and then rebooting. However, after the kernel > > boots, it gives a signal 10 when trying to invoke /bin/sh to run > > /etc/rc. > > > > Am I way off base trying to do this? It seems like it should work > > but I'm missing something that isn't easy to diagnose. Do I need > > to replace /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 with an amd64 binary also? > > I'm pretty sure it's not supported under 5.x. The i386 support just > isn't good enough. I'm not sure about 6.x. Support is supposed to > be a lot better there, but I don't recall any word of people testing > this so at that point I suspect not. I would suspect a jailed root > will work before a real root file system does. The emulation layer is targeted at application level programs, not system tools. That means that system tools that use a binary interface with the kernel (mount, mountd, and so on) just won't work because we don't have a translation layer for that stuff. There are problems with sysctl too, any 32 bit app that expects a 'long' item to be 32 bits will find out the hard way too. This is probably what is breaking init, and it'll certainly break the boot shortly after init anyway. Making a 64 bit kernel work perfectly with a 32 bit world is a huge task. There are administrative ioctls with binary interfaces buried all over the place. Not to mention libkvm consumers... -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 05:54:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8090316A502 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:53:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@blue.virtual-estates.net) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80FB45E3F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 04:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@blue.virtual-estates.net) Received: (qmail 4259 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2005 04:27:41 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO blue.virtual-estates.net) ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Aug 2005 04:27:41 -0000 Received: from blue.virtual-estates.net (blue [127.0.0.1]) by blue.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7A4RdXk088851; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:27:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@blue.virtual-estates.net) Received: (from mi@localhost) by blue.virtual-estates.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j7A4RcKi088850; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:27:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) From: "Mikhail T." Message-Id: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> To: gnome@FreeBSD.org, amd64@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:27:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:54:17 -0000 After a rather ungratifying exchange with some of the prominent Mozilla project members, here is my conclusion. The "old" firefox-1.x is not expected to run on amd64. Lucky you, if it does. The code for the branch was forked a long time ago (circa April 2004, AFAIK) and only "security fixes" get merged into it. Do not bother submitting patches -- you will be yelled at unceremoniously for wasting developers' time with patches against an obsolete version and accused of other misdemeanors. The upcoming version of the browser -- "Deer Park", a.k.a. 1.5 -- currently in alpha2, is supposed to come off the trunk of their cvs tree, which already contains a lot of bug-fixes, including 64bit-specific ones, but these will NOT be merged into the firefox-1.x branch. Those fixes aren't great -- "long", for example, is used in lieu of "intptr_t" (MSVC is not C99-compliant, so screw you), but they just happen to work for now. I think, we need to concentrate on porting this new Deer Park version (www/deerpark ?) in preferance of the current (www/firefox). Although alpha, it, apparently, has a better chance of working right on our "unusual" set of platforms. The 1.5 release is expected in September. Those wanting a stabler browser right now ought to use linux-firefox, opera, or konqueror. Comments? -mi P.S. I have a seemingly working firefox right now on FreeBSD/amd64. I even have some extensions loaded. But installing the Forecastfox extension hoses it reliably, which does not happen with the 32-bit versions (neither linux-firefox on amd64, nor native on i386). From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 05:54:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B693416A5EE for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:54:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B44545D13 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 03:47:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7A3l8gS059528; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:47:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j7A3l8CT059527; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:47:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:47:08 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Bob Willcox Message-ID: <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:54:28 -0000 On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:53:09PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:28:40AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:13:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > Dear Sirs. > > > I do not follow up everything written herein, so my question may sound > > > stupid. > > > On my FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 box I run a 'clean' 64 Bit FreeBSD 6.0 (no 32Bit > > > compatibility). I want to use OpenOffice from time to time reading Word > > > or Excel documents. Can we compile and run OO 2.0 without 32 Bit > > > compatibility enabled? I know this implies 64Bit clean code, so the > > > major question would be whether OO 2 is 64 Bit clean or not. > > > > No OOo isn't 64-bit clean. > > Is it possible to build and run a 32-bit version of OOo on AMD64? Build, no. Run should be possible. Someone really needs to sit down and wrap their heads around the Ports Collection and make it so that we can install 32-bit i386 packages (actually just the .so's) on FreeBSD/AMD64. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 05:56:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C9516AA1B for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:55:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B5645D18 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 03:47:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7A3l8gS059528; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:47:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j7A3l8CT059527; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:47:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:47:08 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Bob Willcox Message-ID: <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:56:21 -0000 On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:53:09PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:28:40AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:13:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > Dear Sirs. > > > I do not follow up everything written herein, so my question may sound > > > stupid. > > > On my FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 box I run a 'clean' 64 Bit FreeBSD 6.0 (no 32Bit > > > compatibility). I want to use OpenOffice from time to time reading Word > > > or Excel documents. Can we compile and run OO 2.0 without 32 Bit > > > compatibility enabled? I know this implies 64Bit clean code, so the > > > major question would be whether OO 2 is 64 Bit clean or not. > > > > No OOo isn't 64-bit clean. > > Is it possible to build and run a 32-bit version of OOo on AMD64? Build, no. Run should be possible. Someone really needs to sit down and wrap their heads around the Ports Collection and make it so that we can install 32-bit i386 packages (actually just the .so's) on FreeBSD/AMD64. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 06:13:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D61816A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:13:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A41743D5C; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:13:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7A6DMoX091855; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:13:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j7A6DMQg091854; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:13:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:13:22 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: "David O'Brien" Message-ID: <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:13:23 -0000 On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:47:08PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:53:09PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:28:40AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:13:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > Dear Sirs. > > > > I do not follow up everything written herein, so my question may sound > > > > stupid. > > > > On my FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 box I run a 'clean' 64 Bit FreeBSD 6.0 (no 32Bit > > > > compatibility). I want to use OpenOffice from time to time reading Word > > > > or Excel documents. Can we compile and run OO 2.0 without 32 Bit > > > > compatibility enabled? I know this implies 64Bit clean code, so the > > > > major question would be whether OO 2 is 64 Bit clean or not. > > > > > > No OOo isn't 64-bit clean. > > > > Is it possible to build and run a 32-bit version of OOo on AMD64? > > Build, no. Run should be possible. Someone really needs to sit down and > wrap their heads around the Ports Collection and make it so that we can > install 32-bit i386 packages (actually just the .so's) on FreeBSD/AMD64. > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr because the Porter's Handbook is useless. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 06:13:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B591716A425 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6828643D49 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7A6DMoX091855; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:13:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j7A6DMQg091854; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:13:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:13:22 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: "David O'Brien" Message-ID: <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:13:27 -0000 On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:47:08PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:53:09PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:28:40AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:13:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > Dear Sirs. > > > > I do not follow up everything written herein, so my question may sound > > > > stupid. > > > > On my FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 box I run a 'clean' 64 Bit FreeBSD 6.0 (no 32Bit > > > > compatibility). I want to use OpenOffice from time to time reading Word > > > > or Excel documents. Can we compile and run OO 2.0 without 32 Bit > > > > compatibility enabled? I know this implies 64Bit clean code, so the > > > > major question would be whether OO 2 is 64 Bit clean or not. > > > > > > No OOo isn't 64-bit clean. > > > > Is it possible to build and run a 32-bit version of OOo on AMD64? > > Build, no. Run should be possible. Someone really needs to sit down and > wrap their heads around the Ports Collection and make it so that we can > install 32-bit i386 packages (actually just the .so's) on FreeBSD/AMD64. > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr because the Porter's Handbook is useless. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 06:13:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576B916A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:13:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (salama58.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.207.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6F143D48; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.int.athame.co.uk ([192.168.1.1] helo=localhost) by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1E2jqe-0009dg-Bp; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:13:56 +0300 From: Andy Fawcett To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:13:33 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508100913.36763.andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:13:58 -0000 On Wednesday 10 August 2005 06:47, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:53:09PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:28:40AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:13:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > Dear Sirs. > > > > I do not follow up everything written herein, so my question may > > > > sound stupid. > > > > On my FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 box I run a 'clean' 64 Bit FreeBSD 6.0 (no > > > > 32Bit compatibility). I want to use OpenOffice from time to time > > > > reading Word or Excel documents. Can we compile and run OO 2.0 > > > > without 32 Bit compatibility enabled? I know this implies 64Bit clean > > > > code, so the major question would be whether OO 2 is 64 Bit clean or > > > > not. > > > > > > No OOo isn't 64-bit clean. > > > > Is it possible to build and run a 32-bit version of OOo on AMD64? > > Build, no. Run should be possible. Someone really needs to sit down and > wrap their heads around the Ports Collection and make it so that we can > install 32-bit i386 packages (actually just the .so's) on FreeBSD/AMD64. I actually tried this just the other day, using pkg_add to install the 32bit OOo. There were no errors during the pkg_add, but when I try to configure: $ /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.5/setup /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsal.so.3" not found, required by "javaldx" /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsb645fi.so" not found, required by "setup.bin" I haven't really had time to investigate this further though. A. -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 06:50:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056B716A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:50:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (koyukuk.teamcool.net [209.161.34.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E45543D45 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:50:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id A747211EB1 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:50:43 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cochise.teamcool.net (unknown [192.168.1.57]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 6E7BF11EA4 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:50:43 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:50:42 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050810005042.02b0a1d2.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> Organization: Teamcool Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:50:49 -0000 On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:27:38 -0400 (EDT) "Mikhail T." wrote: > After a rather ungratifying exchange with some of the prominent Mozilla > project members, here is my conclusion. > > The "old" firefox-1.x is not expected to run on amd64. Lucky you, if it > does. The code for the branch was forked a long time ago (circa April > 2004, AFAIK) and only "security fixes" get merged into it. > > Do not bother submitting patches -- you will be yelled at > unceremoniously for wasting developers' time with patches against an > obsolete version and accused of other misdemeanors. > > The upcoming version of the browser -- "Deer Park", a.k.a. 1.5 -- > currently in alpha2, is supposed to come off the trunk of their > cvs tree, which already contains a lot of bug-fixes, including > 64bit-specific ones, but these will NOT be merged into the firefox-1.x > branch. > > Those fixes aren't great -- "long", for example, is used in lieu of > "intptr_t" (MSVC is not C99-compliant, so screw you), but they just > happen to work for now. > > I think, we need to concentrate on porting this new Deer Park version > (www/deerpark ?) in preferance of the current (www/firefox). Although > alpha, it, apparently, has a better chance of working right on our > "unusual" set of platforms. > > The 1.5 release is expected in September. > > Those wanting a stabler browser right now ought to use linux-firefox, > opera, or konqueror. > > Comments? > > -mi Use Galeon or Epiphany? I'm of the general opinion that, while FF is a godsend for M$ clients, it pretty much sucks on *nix. I don't know the 64 bit status of those browsers but I suspect you'll b get more cooperation. Your's is far from the first complaint I've heard regarding the FF team's arrogance. Epiphany and Galeon are both workable solutions, so why bother w/FF and being treated poorly? My $0.02... Worth about what you paid for it... -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 07:06:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEDB16A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:06:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61ECF43D45 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:06:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7A7IbsB006813; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:18:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42F9A76F.9010101@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:06:23 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken Gunderson References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> <20050810005042.02b0a1d2.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20050810005042.02b0a1d2.kgunders@teamcool.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:06:27 -0000 Ken Gunderson wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:27:38 -0400 (EDT) > "Mikhail T." wrote: > > >>After a rather ungratifying exchange with some of the prominent Mozilla >>project members, here is my conclusion. >> >>The "old" firefox-1.x is not expected to run on amd64. Lucky you, if it >>does. The code for the branch was forked a long time ago (circa April >>2004, AFAIK) and only "security fixes" get merged into it. >> >>Do not bother submitting patches -- you will be yelled at >>unceremoniously for wasting developers' time with patches against an >>obsolete version and accused of other misdemeanors. >> >>The upcoming version of the browser -- "Deer Park", a.k.a. 1.5 -- >>currently in alpha2, is supposed to come off the trunk of their >>cvs tree, which already contains a lot of bug-fixes, including >>64bit-specific ones, but these will NOT be merged into the firefox-1.x >>branch. >> >>Those fixes aren't great -- "long", for example, is used in lieu of >>"intptr_t" (MSVC is not C99-compliant, so screw you), but they just >>happen to work for now. >> >>I think, we need to concentrate on porting this new Deer Park version >>(www/deerpark ?) in preferance of the current (www/firefox). Although >>alpha, it, apparently, has a better chance of working right on our >>"unusual" set of platforms. >> >>The 1.5 release is expected in September. >> >>Those wanting a stabler browser right now ought to use linux-firefox, >>opera, or konqueror. >> >>Comments? >> >> -mi > > > Use Galeon or Epiphany? I'm of the general opinion that, while FF is a > godsend for M$ clients, it pretty much sucks on *nix. > > I don't know the 64 bit status of those browsers but I suspect you'll b > get more cooperation. Your's is far from the first complaint I've > heard regarding the FF team's arrogance. Epiphany and Galeon are both > workable solutions, so why bother w/FF and being treated poorly? > > My $0.02... Worth about what you paid for it... > I've been using Mozilla (the real Mozilla) on FreeBSD/amd64 for several months and have had few problems with it. Despite the wishes of the Firefox team to pretend that Firefox is somehow the holy blessed browser, you'll have to pry Mozilla from cold, dead hands. The only thing I hate more than Firefox is the thick stench of propaganda surrounding it. Scott From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 08:45:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331E016A420 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:45:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mr.skoe@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F7243D53 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:45:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mr.skoe@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so54283nzd for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:45:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=A0JXoIl0sVRfANn5pioVkq6lywhkvDWDD9JajpIr+Rropm5ysySSf1T4kemv1/Iz882My+YpSsmQ1DhIhAJUTc2qEYLN/q1bYiTJAl+qBompIZtfW3Palpc4QC9cO4enk79a2hyWfPKhfVW38XgmBTyz5OPD9lKK2x9GfCDlVjE= Received: by 10.36.101.5 with SMTP id y5mr496677nzb; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.138.17 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:45:50 +0000 From: Mathew Schofield To: Scott Long , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> <20050810005042.02b0a1d2.kgunders@teamcool.net> <42F9A76F.9010101@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:45:52 -0000 >=20 > > Use Galeon or Epiphany? I'm of the general opinion that, while FF is a > > godsend for M$ clients, it pretty much sucks on *nix.=20 >=20 Epiphany works on AMD64/5.4. The only > thing I hate more than Firefox is the thick stench of propaganda > surrounding it. >=20 Sounds like linux. *Sigh*. --=20 Thank You Mathew Schofield mr.skoe@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 09:03:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A9816A43C for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:03:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gzghuladze@bog.ge) Received: from keso.bog.ge (bog.ge [213.157.209.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E4143D6E for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:03:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gzghuladze@bog.ge) Received: from sqltest.bog.ge (sqltest.bog.ge [10.45.45.11]) by keso.bog.ge (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7A8tFZS006893 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:55:37 +0400 Received: from mari.bog.ge ([10.45.45.4]) by sqltest.bog.ge with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:03:48 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:57:07 +0500 Message-ID: <7578D8D4E768B74E8B2C3DEB9E9B733D5B7390@mari.bog.ge> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: About FreeBSD 4.7 or 4.9 Thread-Index: AcWdgRqd0kr+7C2ES3SX9Kr6gUMV9w== Importance: normal Priority: normal From: "Gia Zghuladze" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2005 08:03:48.0561 (UTC) FILETIME=[09CC2410:01C59D82] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: About FreeBSD 4.7 or 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:03:46 -0000 Hello Can I install FreeBSD 4.7 or 4.9 on AMD Opteron processor series 200 (250) ? =20 ------------------------------- Giorgi Zghuladze Senior system administrator IT Department Bank of Georgia 3 Pushkin Str. Tbilisi 0105, Georgia Cell: (995 77) 45 42 40 =20 This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be = privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender = by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any = unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is = strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. = JSC Bank of Georgia shall not be responsible nor liable for the proper = and complete transmission of the information contained in this = communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. = JSC Bank of Georgia does not guarantee that the integrity of this = communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free = of viruses, interceptions or interference. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 09:08:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D41A16A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:08:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63E0C43D64 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 4778 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2005 09:08:52 -0000 Received: from maxwell6.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.212) by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 10 Aug 2005 09:08:52 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.246.166]) by maxwell6.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20050810090852.XBMJ1233.maxwell6.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:08:52 +0800 Message-ID: <42F9C3D0.3080506@pacific.net.sg> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:07:28 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gia Zghuladze References: <7578D8D4E768B74E8B2C3DEB9E9B733D5B7390@mari.bog.ge> In-Reply-To: <7578D8D4E768B74E8B2C3DEB9E9B733D5B7390@mari.bog.ge> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: About FreeBSD 4.7 or 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:08:58 -0000 Hi, Gia Zghuladze wrote: > Hello > Can I install FreeBSD 4.7 or 4.9 on AMD Opteron processor series 200 You can. But why don't you download the more current versions 4.11 or 5.4? Erich From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 09:24:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FAD16A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:24:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3134F43D45 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:24:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost.englishbreakfastnetwork.org) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/5.2) with ESMTP id j7A9NtVu005550; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:23:55 +0200 (MEST) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:23:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.90 References: <7578D8D4E768B74E8B2C3DEB9E9B733D5B7390@mari.bog.ge> <42F9C3D0.3080506@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <42F9C3D0.3080506@pacific.net.sg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508101123.55505.groot@kde.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.399 () BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 131.174.33.4 Cc: Gia Zghuladze Subject: Re: About FreeBSD 4.7 or 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:24:15 -0000 On Wednesday 10 August 2005 11:07, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Gia Zghuladze wrote: > > Hello > > Can I install FreeBSD 4.7 or 4.9 on AMD Opteron processor series 200 > > You can. You can, but remember that 4.7 and 4.9 had no amd64 support at all, so you will be running i386 -- which isn't bad at all. I can't say whether SMP will work though. -- These are your friends - Adem GPG: FEA2 A3FE Adriaan de Groot From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 10:52:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD8116A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:52:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F01F043D46 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:52:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 25689 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2005 10:52:44 -0000 Received: from maxwell6.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.212) by smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 10 Aug 2005 10:52:43 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.246.166]) by maxwell6.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20050810105243.XVBU1233.maxwell6.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:52:43 +0800 Message-ID: <42F9DC27.80607@pacific.net.sg> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:51:19 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gia Zghuladze , freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org References: <7578D8D4E768B74E8B2C3DEB9E9B733D5B73BB@mari.bog.ge> In-Reply-To: <7578D8D4E768B74E8B2C3DEB9E9B733D5B73BB@mari.bog.ge> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: About FreeBSD 4.7 or 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:52:47 -0000 Hi, Gia Zghuladze wrote: > As far as I know 4.7 and 4.9 is stable, in contrast to a higher > versions This was a long time ago that those versions were considered stable. No they are considered outdated. > Am I right ? No. 4.11 and 5.4 are both stable and 6.0 is not yet stable. You get both from www.freebsd.org or one of its mirrors. Erich From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 11:51:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C75716A420 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:51:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF4443D48 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:51:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (pimout1-int.prodigy.net [207.115.5.65]) by ylpvm43.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7ABpUfY018325 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:51:30 -0400 X-ORBL: [66.136.206.1] Received: from maul.immure.com (adsl-66-136-206-1.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [66.136.206.1]) by pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7ABp7n6236634; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:51:12 -0400 Received: from luke.immure.com (luke.immure.com [10.1.132.3]) by maul.immure.com (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7ABp0GM092412; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:51:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from luke.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by luke.immure.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7ABp0wm066544; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:51:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@luke.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by luke.immure.com (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j7ABp0sV066543; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:51:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:51:00 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Andy Fawcett Message-ID: <20050810115100.GA66492@luke.immure.com> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <200508100913.36763.andy@athame.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508100913.36763.andy@athame.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-immure-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-immure-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: bob@immure.com Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bob Willcox List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:51:27 -0000 On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:13:33AM +0300, Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 06:47, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:53:09PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:28:40AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:13:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > Dear Sirs. > > > > > I do not follow up everything written herein, so my question may > > > > > sound stupid. > > > > > On my FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 box I run a 'clean' 64 Bit FreeBSD 6.0 (no > > > > > 32Bit compatibility). I want to use OpenOffice from time to time > > > > > reading Word or Excel documents. Can we compile and run OO 2.0 > > > > > without 32 Bit compatibility enabled? I know this implies 64Bit clean > > > > > code, so the major question would be whether OO 2 is 64 Bit clean or > > > > > not. > > > > > > > > No OOo isn't 64-bit clean. > > > > > > Is it possible to build and run a 32-bit version of OOo on AMD64? > > > > Build, no. Run should be possible. Someone really needs to sit down and > > wrap their heads around the Ports Collection and make it so that we can > > install 32-bit i386 packages (actually just the .so's) on FreeBSD/AMD64. > > I actually tried this just the other day, using pkg_add to install the 32bit > OOo. There were no errors during the pkg_add, but when I try to configure: > > $ /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.5/setup > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsal.so.3" not found, required by > "javaldx" > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsb645fi.so" not found, required by > "setup.bin" > > I haven't really had time to investigate this further though. I had the same problem when I tried to run a 32bit version of OOo on my AMD64 system; and like you, haven't had a chance to persue it yet. Bob -- Bob Willcox The early bird who catches the worm works for someone bob@immure.com who comes in late and owns the worm farm. Austin, TX -- Travis McGee From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 12:07:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA9216A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:07:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterk@maltanet.net) Received: from maltanet.net (mailer4.maltanet.net [194.158.37.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD6E43D46 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:07:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterk@maltanet.net) Received: (qmail 2674 invoked by uid 513); 10 Aug 2005 12:07:13 -0000 Received: from 195.158.81.236 by mailer4.maltanet.net (envelope-from , uid 506) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(195.158.81.236):. Processed in 1.093986 secs); 10 Aug 2005 12:07:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.1]) ([195.158.81.236]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Aug 2005 12:07:12 -0000 Message-ID: <42F9EE0F.8090307@maltanet.net> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:07:43 +0200 From: Peter Korsten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: nl-NL, nl, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> <20050810005042.02b0a1d2.kgunders@teamcool.net> <42F9A76F.9010101@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <42F9A76F.9010101@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:07:50 -0000 Scott Long schreef: >> Use Galeon or Epiphany? I'm of the general opinion that, while FF is a >> godsend for M$ clients, it pretty much sucks on *nix. >> >> I don't know the 64 bit status of those browsers but I suspect you'll b >> get more cooperation. Your's is far from the first complaint I've >> heard regarding the FF team's arrogance. Epiphany and Galeon are both >> workable solutions, so why bother w/FF and being treated poorly? So what's wrong with it on Unix? At work, I run it on my Sun Blade 100 running Solaris 8, and whilst my Athlon64 beats it hands-down in about every aspect, I'm quite happy with it. Especially all the extensions, although arguably quite a few of those should go into a Dashboard-like application like Mac OS X has. > I've been using Mozilla (the real Mozilla) on FreeBSD/amd64 for several > months and have had few problems with it. Despite the wishes of the > Firefox team to pretend that Firefox is somehow the holy blessed > browser, you'll have to pry Mozilla from cold, dead hands. The only > thing I hate more than Firefox is the thick stench of propaganda > surrounding it. Hmm. I was quite happy to move from Mozilla to Firefox, although I'm still working mostly on It That Must Not Be Named. (Mea culpa - haven't gotten round to download and burn 5.4, which should support my Asus A8N-SLI better than 5.3.) But a certain amount of arrogance/hard-headedness is inherent to everything at the Mozilla project. For instance, the insistence that CSS is nothing less than the New Revelations of the Supreme Being. That they draw their own widgets, because CSS doesn't explicitly forbid overlapping text and/or widgets. Never mind that it's totally impractical. In fact, this attitude is inherent to many open-source projects, and I seem to be noticing a certain backlash from Windows people, who start doing the same thing. Thank goodness that there's some common sense left in - not to sound too self-congratulatory - FreeBSD. :) - Peter From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 13:10:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561D016A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:10:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from yggdrasil.interstroom.nl (yggdrasil.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3DD43D45 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:10:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180] helo=[192.168.1.42]) by yggdrasil with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1E2qLk-0003EB-00 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:10:28 +0200 Message-ID: <42F9FCC3.40303@axis.nl> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:10:27 +0200 From: Olaf Greve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.4.1.centos4 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Interstroom virusscan, please e-mail helpdesk@interstroom.nl for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: Subject: What motherboard to use with AMD-64 + Adaptec 2200S + FBSD5.4 AMD-64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:10:49 -0000 Hi, First of all, I'm new to this list so I hope I'm not flogging a dead horse with my request, but I'm in some dire need of some good advice and I hope someone over here can help me (as I'm not 100% certain of some of the possible solutions I've seen)... The situation: I want to use FreeBSD 5.4 Release AMD-64, and I want to do so using my Adaptec 2200S U320 SCSI RAID controller. Now, the issue is that the machine that has been delivered has an Asus K8N deluxe board, with an AMD-64 Athlon XP 3400 processor, with a 754 socket. The issue: The motherboard only has 32-bit 33MHz PCI slots, and the Adaptec 2200S requires a 64-bit 66MHz (or faster) slot in order to be able to work at U320. I can use it in a 32-bit slot, but that would down-grade the performance to U160, which is something I really rather not want to do. Basically, the question then winds down to the following: Can anyone recommend me a good motherboard (preferrably server-grade) that can -preferrably- use the same processor, is compatible with FreeBSD 5.4 Release AMD-64, and that has at least one 64-bit 66MHz (or better) slot? In case there are no possibilities for such a board with this particular processor, can anyone recommend a board that does have the correct type of PCI slots, and a different type of processor? Thank you very kindly in advance for taking the time to address this request, and I hope someone has some good answers... Kind regards, Olaf Greve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 15:09:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8355016A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:09:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AF243D49; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:09:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [192.168.100.1]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F37EE123FCA; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:08:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:08:46 +0200 From: Miguel Mendez To: Steve Kargl Message-Id: <20050810170846.2f7ec54e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.6.9; amd64-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__10_Aug_2005_17_08_46_+0200_Z28KFCNzh+GGyofC" Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:09:17 -0000 --Signature=_Wed__10_Aug_2005_17_08_46_+0200_Z28KFCNzh+GGyofC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:13:22 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: > > Build, no. Run should be possible. Someone really needs to sit down a= nd > > wrap their heads around the Ports Collection and make it so that we can > > install 32-bit i386 packages (actually just the .so's) on FreeBSD/AMD64. > > =20 >=20 > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. Is that the case? I see all kinds of useful stuff being added all the time, e.g. the OPTIONS system and other nice features. I'm sure that the ports people will welcome your patches for both the documentation (what exactly is wrong with the porters handbook?) and the ports system. With regards to OOo on AMD64, ISTR some 64bit patches floating around (could be on gentoo's portage) that might be worth investigating. A FreeBSD or Linux openoffice-bin port could be useful in the meantime, I'll give that a shot when I have some time since I have the need to run OO.org on my AMD64 box. Cheers, --=20 Miguel Mendez http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 --Signature=_Wed__10_Aug_2005_17_08_46_+0200_Z28KFCNzh+GGyofC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC+hiBnLctrNyFFPERAnzyAJ0Qpyo0lcB6tkhUIM/pOPhRJV625QCfctRe WWWCa1NOOY6ar0/dSNkc01c= =sA3v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__10_Aug_2005_17_08_46_+0200_Z28KFCNzh+GGyofC-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 15:23:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381D916A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:23:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E91143D48; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:23:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7AFOXe8055670; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:24:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: "Mikhail T." In-Reply-To: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oOJQ16hEwbusaNV/Twz7" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:23:19 -0400 Message-Id: <1123687400.14039.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:23:41 -0000 --=-oOJQ16hEwbusaNV/Twz7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 00:27 -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > After a rather ungratifying exchange with some of the prominent Mozilla > project members, here is my conclusion. >=20 > The "old" firefox-1.x is not expected to run on amd64. Lucky you, if it > does. The code for the branch was forked a long time ago (circa April > 2004, AFAIK) and only "security fixes" get merged into it. >=20 > Do not bother submitting patches -- you will be yelled at > unceremoniously for wasting developers' time with patches against an > obsolete version and accused of other misdemeanors. >=20 > The upcoming version of the browser -- "Deer Park", a.k.a. 1.5 -- > currently in alpha2, is supposed to come off the trunk of their > cvs tree, which already contains a lot of bug-fixes, including > 64bit-specific ones, but these will NOT be merged into the firefox-1.x > branch. >=20 > Those fixes aren't great -- "long", for example, is used in lieu of > "intptr_t" (MSVC is not C99-compliant, so screw you), but they just > happen to work for now. >=20 > I think, we need to concentrate on porting this new Deer Park version > (www/deerpark ?) in preferance of the current (www/firefox). Although > alpha, it, apparently, has a better chance of working right on our > "unusual" set of platforms. >=20 > The 1.5 release is expected in September. >=20 > Those wanting a stabler browser right now ought to use linux-firefox, > opera, or konqueror. >=20 > Comments? See the list archives. A port of 1.1 already exists at http://www.marcuscom.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports. Joe >=20 > -mi >=20 > P.S. I have a seemingly working firefox right now on FreeBSD/amd64. > I even have some extensions loaded. But installing the Forecastfox > extension hoses it reliably, which does not happen with the 32-bit > versions (neither linux-firefox on amd64, nor native on i386). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-oOJQ16hEwbusaNV/Twz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC+hvnb2iPiv4Uz4cRAluIAJ9KmKgGt2KlIOSoq7MQ7DTvX2GvqwCaAqRV 06LtrEOByLYiBQgsR3msfpo= =fxvI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-oOJQ16hEwbusaNV/Twz7-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 15:58:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CF016A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (glewis.dsl.xmission.com [166.70.56.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEAB43D46 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:58:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7AFwQC7004509; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:58:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j7AFwK8G004500; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:58:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:58:20 -0600 From: Greg Lewis To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20050810155820.GA4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> <20050810005042.02b0a1d2.kgunders@teamcool.net> <42F9A76F.9010101@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42F9A76F.9010101@samsco.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:58:29 -0000 On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:06:23AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > I've been using Mozilla (the real Mozilla) on FreeBSD/amd64 for several > months and have had few problems with it. Despite the wishes of the > Firefox team to pretend that Firefox is somehow the holy blessed > browser, you'll have to pry Mozilla from cold, dead hands. The only > thing I hate more than Firefox is the thick stench of propaganda > surrounding it. For a different perspective, I can't get Mozilla to work on my amd64 box at work, the port hangs while trying to register things during the install step. In comparison firefox has worked well for me. I'm running 5.4. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 16:06:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0917516A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (glewis.dsl.xmission.com [166.70.56.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E71C43D46 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7AG5Zkg004581; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:05:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j7AG5YfC004580; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:05:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:05:34 -0600 From: Greg Lewis To: Bob Willcox Message-ID: <20050810160533.GB4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <200508100913.36763.andy@athame.co.uk> <20050810115100.GA66492@luke.immure.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810115100.GA66492@luke.immure.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: "O. Hartmann" , Andy Fawcett , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:06:11 -0000 On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:51:00AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:13:33AM +0300, Andy Fawcett wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 06:47, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:53:09PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:28:40AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:13:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sirs. > > > > > > I do not follow up everything written herein, so my question may > > > > > > sound stupid. > > > > > > On my FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 box I run a 'clean' 64 Bit FreeBSD 6.0 (no > > > > > > 32Bit compatibility). I want to use OpenOffice from time to time > > > > > > reading Word or Excel documents. Can we compile and run OO 2.0 > > > > > > without 32 Bit compatibility enabled? I know this implies 64Bit clean > > > > > > code, so the major question would be whether OO 2 is 64 Bit clean or > > > > > > not. > > > > > > > > > > No OOo isn't 64-bit clean. > > > > > > > > Is it possible to build and run a 32-bit version of OOo on AMD64? > > > > > > Build, no. Run should be possible. Someone really needs to sit down and > > > wrap their heads around the Ports Collection and make it so that we can > > > install 32-bit i386 packages (actually just the .so's) on FreeBSD/AMD64. > > > > I actually tried this just the other day, using pkg_add to install the 32bit > > OOo. There were no errors during the pkg_add, but when I try to configure: > > > > $ /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.5/setup > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsal.so.3" not found, required by > > "javaldx" > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsb645fi.so" not found, required by > > "setup.bin" > > > > I haven't really had time to investigate this further though. > > I had the same problem when I tried to run a 32bit version of OOo on my > AMD64 system; and like you, haven't had a chance to persue it yet. I'm running the 32 bit Linux version from SuSE 9.3 under emulation on my amd64 box and its working quite well, so there is always that option. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 16:32:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4B316A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:32:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB2443D48 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:32:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (pimout1-int.prodigy.net [207.115.5.65]) by ylpvm43.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7AGKhfY000519 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:22:03 -0400 X-ORBL: [66.136.206.1] Received: from maul.immure.com (adsl-66-136-206-1.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [66.136.206.1]) by pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7AGKCVq127914; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:20:19 -0400 Received: from luke.immure.com (luke.immure.com [10.1.132.3]) by maul.immure.com (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7AGK6Hg097524; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:20:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from luke.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by luke.immure.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7AGK5uJ068641; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:20:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@luke.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by luke.immure.com (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j7AGK5CT068640; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:20:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:20:05 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Greg Lewis Message-ID: <20050810162005.GA67793@luke.immure.com> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <200508100913.36763.andy@athame.co.uk> <20050810115100.GA66492@luke.immure.com> <20050810160533.GB4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810160533.GB4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-immure-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-immure-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: bob@immure.com Cc: "O. Hartmann" , Andy Fawcett , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bob Willcox List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:32:47 -0000 On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:05:34AM -0600, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:51:00AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:13:33AM +0300, Andy Fawcett wrote: > > > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 06:47, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:53:09PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:28:40AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:13:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Sirs. > > > > > > > I do not follow up everything written herein, so my question may > > > > > > > sound stupid. > > > > > > > On my FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 box I run a 'clean' 64 Bit FreeBSD 6.0 (no > > > > > > > 32Bit compatibility). I want to use OpenOffice from time to time > > > > > > > reading Word or Excel documents. Can we compile and run OO 2.0 > > > > > > > without 32 Bit compatibility enabled? I know this implies 64Bit clean > > > > > > > code, so the major question would be whether OO 2 is 64 Bit clean or > > > > > > > not. > > > > > > > > > > > > No OOo isn't 64-bit clean. > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to build and run a 32-bit version of OOo on AMD64? > > > > > > > > Build, no. Run should be possible. Someone really needs to sit down and > > > > wrap their heads around the Ports Collection and make it so that we can > > > > install 32-bit i386 packages (actually just the .so's) on FreeBSD/AMD64. > > > > > > I actually tried this just the other day, using pkg_add to install the 32bit > > > OOo. There were no errors during the pkg_add, but when I try to configure: > > > > > > $ /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.5/setup > > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsal.so.3" not found, required by > > > "javaldx" > > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsb645fi.so" not found, required by > > > "setup.bin" > > > > > > I haven't really had time to investigate this further though. > > > > I had the same problem when I tried to run a 32bit version of OOo on my > > AMD64 system; and like you, haven't had a chance to persue it yet. > > I'm running the 32 bit Linux version from SuSE 9.3 under emulation on > my amd64 box and its working quite well, so there is always that option. I have not been so fortunate there either. I don't recall which Linux version I tried, but whichever it was it wasn't much better. It would start up okay but crashed easily. I may try that again, but I really would prefer a native FreeBSD version (either 32 or 64 bit, doesn't really matter to me). Bob > > -- > Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com > Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com > Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org -- Bob Willcox The early bird who catches the worm works for someone bob@immure.com who comes in late and owns the worm farm. Austin, TX -- Travis McGee From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 17:06:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF62516A421 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:06:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (koyukuk.teamcool.net [209.161.34.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B12943D6B for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:06:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 19AC211EB1 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:06:26 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cochise.teamcool.net (unknown [192.168.1.57]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id D80FD11EA4 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:06:25 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:06:25 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050810110625.35cd9aa3.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20050810155820.GA4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> <20050810005042.02b0a1d2.kgunders@teamcool.net> <42F9A76F.9010101@samsco.org> <20050810155820.GA4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Organization: Teamcool Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:06:32 -0000 On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:58:20 -0600 Greg Lewis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:06:23AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > I've been using Mozilla (the real Mozilla) on FreeBSD/amd64 for several > > months and have had few problems with it. Despite the wishes of the > > Firefox team to pretend that Firefox is somehow the holy blessed > > browser, you'll have to pry Mozilla from cold, dead hands. The only > > thing I hate more than Firefox is the thick stench of propaganda > > surrounding it. > > For a different perspective, I can't get Mozilla to work on my amd64 > box at work, the port hangs while trying to register things during the > install step. In comparison firefox has worked well for me. I'm > running 5.4. I'm not a developer but have heard that FF is optimized for Windows platform. It is certainly noticeably slower than either Konqueror, Epiphany, or Galeon on my dated workstation. If you need lots of bell/whistles/ extensions, etc. it may be the way to go but otherwise I think there are better options for us *nix people. And, fwiw, a couple months back I spent a couple days playing with all of them w/ exception of Opera. They just don't get the dedicated mass marketing efforts that are invested into FF. If they did.... -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 17:11:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B878516A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFD943D55 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:11:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) Received: (qmail 23140 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2005 17:11:47 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Aug 2005 17:11:46 -0000 Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7AHBdih085076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:11:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7AHBW4M034173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:11:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7AHBIjf005885; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:11:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mteterin.us.murex.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j7AHBHCc005884; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:11:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mteterin.us.murex.com: mteterin set sender to Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com using -f From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Murex North America To: Joe Marcus Clarke Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:11:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> <1123687400.14039.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1123687400.14039.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508101311.17048.Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV devel-20050525/1011/Tue Aug 9 05:20:28 2005 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:11:49 -0000 > See the list archives. šA port of 1.1 already exists at > http://www.marcuscom.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports. Why don't you add it to the ports? As firefox-alpha or some such, with IGNORE if need be. Our cvs repository is intended to facilitate our development/porting efforts -- no need to shy away from putting incomplete work in there, in my opinion... Just mark it as such. BTW, the URL above returns "404 Not Found". Yours, -mi From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 19:02:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171D616A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C26643D46; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7AJ3pTh057466; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:03:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Mikhail Teterin In-Reply-To: <200508101311.17048.Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> <1123687400.14039.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200508101311.17048.Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zt7VErlJEumm1fSDh0eh" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:02:37 -0400 Message-Id: <1123700557.69241.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:52 -0000 --=-zt7VErlJEumm1fSDh0eh Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 13:11 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > See the list archives. A port of 1.1 already exists at > > http://www.marcuscom.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports. >=20 > Why don't you add it to the ports? As firefox-alpha or some such, with IG= NORE=20 > if need be. >=20 > Our cvs repository is intended to facilitate our development/porting effo= rts=20 > -- no need to shy away from putting incomplete work in there, in my=20 > opinion... Just mark it as such. The chrome registration is broken, and we find the limited testbed of GNOME users is more than sufficient for testing. >=20 > BTW, the URL above returns "404 Not Found". Yours, Sorry. http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports Joe >=20 > -mi >=20 >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-zt7VErlJEumm1fSDh0eh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC+k9Nb2iPiv4Uz4cRAqKpAJ9In6vs+6HAvT9d1IZgOC2t9n0nCgCglMJf KI5U/KGFpTBLpR/gFGrcUPQ= =xXUQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zt7VErlJEumm1fSDh0eh-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 21:13:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CDF16A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D270843D58; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:13:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7ALDEsb023669; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:13:14 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id j7ALDE5j023667; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:13:14 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7AL8Xhm009539; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:08:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j7AL8UPM009538; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:08:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:08:30 +0200 To: bzeeb+freebsd+sk4@zabbadoz.net Message-ID: <20050810210830.GA9197@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mail-Followup-To: bzeeb+freebsd+sk4@zabbadoz.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: if_sk no PHY found, next iteration X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:13:22 -0000 Thanks for the info on your http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/if_sk.html page. Here is a dmesg snippet of another sk problem (Asus A8V deluxe, 5.4-R amd64): skc0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem 0xfba00000-0xfba03fff irq 17 at device 10.0 on pci0 skc0: Reserved 0x4000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfba00000 skc0: Marvell Yukon Lite Gigabit Ethernet rev. (0x9) sk0: on skc0 sk0: bpf attached sk0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:a9:d5:6d skc0: no PHY found! device_attach: sk0 attach returned 6 skc0: [MPSAFE] Under TODO you have `unkown rev. 0x9 for Yukon Lite', seems this is it? Btw i also installed xp on the box and for that i had to fetch the latest driver off the marvell.com site too (yk51x86.sys), the one distributed by Asus didnt work. (nice, eh?) Linux's sk98lin driver (2.6.11 kernel) seems to have no problems tho. Any patches/info welcome... Juergen From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 21:20:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A781B16A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:20:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BE743D45; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:20:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066651FF91D; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 9764E1FF90C; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:20:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 3A132153C4; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4EB15329; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:19:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Juergen Lock In-Reply-To: <20050810210830.GA9197@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Message-ID: References: <20050810210830.GA9197@saturn.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_sk no PHY found, next iteration X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:20:10 -0000 On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Juergen Lock wrote: Hi, > Thanks for the info on your http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/if_sk.html > page. Here is a dmesg snippet of another sk problem (Asus A8V deluxe, > 5.4-R amd64): > > skc0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem 0xfba00000-0xfba03fff irq 17 at device 10.0 on pci0 > skc0: Reserved 0x4000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfba00000 > skc0: Marvell Yukon Lite Gigabit Ethernet rev. (0x9) > sk0: on skc0 > sk0: bpf attached > sk0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:a9:d5:6d > skc0: no PHY found! > device_attach: sk0 attach returned 6 > skc0: [MPSAFE] > > Under TODO you have `unkown rev. 0x9 for Yukon Lite', seems this is it? > Btw i also installed xp on the box and for that i had to fetch the > latest driver off the marvell.com site too (yk51x86.sys), the one > distributed by Asus didnt work. (nice, eh?) Linux's sk98lin driver > (2.6.11 kernel) seems to have no problems tho. > > Any patches/info welcome... I am currently fixing another problem but in the meantime you can use this one which should: * fix your problem * catch a bus attach error * improve locking http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/EXPERIMENTAL/if_sk.c-rev1.108.diff -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 21:33:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B5E16A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:33:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF5843D48 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:33:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr) Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (heho.snv.jussieu.fr [134.157.184.22]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.12.11/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id j7ALWeSI025007 ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:32:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 164 Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by heho.snv.jussieu.fr (8.13.3/jtpda-5.2) with ESMTP id j7ALWx6C044706 ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:32:59 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from arno@localhost) by heho.snv.jussieu.fr (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j7ALWwg2044703; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:32:58 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from arno) To: Bob Willcox References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <200508100913.36763.andy@athame.co.uk> <20050810115100.GA66492@luke.immure.com> <20050810160533.GB4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20050810162005.GA67793@luke.immure.com> From: "Arno J. Klaassen" Date: 10 Aug 2005 23:32:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050810162005.GA67793@luke.immure.com> Message-ID: Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.164]); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:32:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 42FA7278.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:33:03 -0000 > > I'm running the 32 bit Linux version from SuSE 9.3 under emulation on > > my amd64 box and its working quite well, so there is always that option. > > I have not been so fortunate there either. I don't recall which Linux > version I tried, but whichever it was it wasn't much better. It would > start up okay but crashed easily. I use 32bit linux openoffice.org1.9.100 . It crashed easily till I replaced the first three line of the startup script by : #!/compat/linux/bin/sh PATH=/usr/bin:/bin export PATH This prevents OO from finding (wrong) /usr/local/bin/java. Works flawless since (though I only use writer and spreadsheet). Arno From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 22:07:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3207516A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:07:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vkushnir@i.kiev.ua) Received: from horse.iptelecom.net.ua (horse.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.224.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAEB43D48 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vkushnir@i.kiev.ua) Received: from h231.242.159.dialup.iptcom.net ([213.159.242.231]:64960 "EHLO kushnir1.kiev.ua" ident: "SOCKFAULT1" whoson: "vkushnir") by horse.iptelecom.net.ua with ESMTP id S1219412AbVHJWG5 (INRCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:06:57 +0300 Received: from kushnir1.kiev.ua (kushnir1.kiev.ua [10.0.0.1]) by kushnir1.kiev.ua (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7AM6rDt075473; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:06:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from vkushnir@i.kiev.ua) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:06:53 +0300 (EEST) From: Vladimir Kushnir X-X-Sender: vkushnir@kushnir1.kiev.ua To: Bob Willcox In-Reply-To: <20050810162005.GA67793@luke.immure.com> Message-ID: <20050811004402.N74661@kushnir1.kiev.ua> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <200508100913.36763.andy@athame.co.uk> <20050810115100.GA66492@luke.immure.com> <20050810160533.GB4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20050810162005.GA67793@luke.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "O. Hartmann" , Andy Fawcett , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:07:01 -0000 On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Bob Willcox wrote: >>>> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsal.so.3" not found, required by >>>> "javaldx" >>>> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsb645fi.so" not found, required by >>>> "setup.bin" >>>> In a lots of packages /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 is hardcoded as well as library paths (/usr/lib and so on). Thus they're looking for a wrong (on amd64) thingies. > I have not been so fortunate there either. I don't recall which Linux > version I tried, but whichever it was it wasn't much better. It would > start up okay but crashed easily. I may try that again, but I really > would prefer a native FreeBSD version (either 32 or 64 bit, doesn't > really matter to me). > Just plain OOo from OpenOffice.org works here like a charm (no java but that's the only defficiency if at all). Still I tend to agree with you - a native one would be preferable. One way to make i386 packages installable & usable seems to put ALL of the i386 compatibility stuff into some /compat/freebsd32 and make freebsd32-compat module look there for a libs (like we do for Linux or SVR4). I WISH I could do this myself! Regards, Vladimir From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 22:59:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B47116A432 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:59:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.tunkrans@bredband.net) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F07443DBD for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:54:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.tunkrans@bredband.net) Received: from [192.168.245.40] ([213.112.167.85] [213.112.167.85]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050810225413.ERRQ23053.mxfep01.bredband.com@[192.168.245.40]> for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:54:13 +0200 Message-ID: <42FA8592.7000701@bredband.net> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:54:10 +0200 From: Lars Tunkrans User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> <20050810005042.02b0a1d2.kgunders@teamcool.net> <42F9A76F.9010101@samsco.org> <20050810155820.GA4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20050810155820.GA4434@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 64-bit firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:59:31 -0000 Greg Lewis wrote: >On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:06:23AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > >>I've been using Mozilla (the real Mozilla) on FreeBSD/amd64 for several >>months and have had few problems with it. Despite the wishes of the >>Firefox team to pretend that Firefox is somehow the holy blessed >>browser, you'll have to pry Mozilla from cold, dead hands. The only >>thing I hate more than Firefox is the thick stench of propaganda >>surrounding it. >> >> > >For a different perspective, I can't get Mozilla to work on my amd64 >box at work, the port hangs while trying to register things during the >install step. In comparison firefox has worked well for me. I'm >running 5.4. > > > Yeah its been like this since last autumn ( on and off ) I first reported this problem 22-09-2004 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mozilla/2004-September/000153.html Regards //Lars From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 23:02:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E565C16A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:02:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C6143D46; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:02:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j7AN2evf030845 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:40 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j7AN2d6P021282; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:39 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED43351215; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:38 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:02:42 -0000 --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. Thanks for the constructive criticism! Kris --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC+oeOWry0BWjoQKURAs1EAKDqY8dEKnAevx0ZP/mCuWeUgZNEewCg69rs krgDfuOZhXGNbX3/nPK5lfo= =BKCf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 23:02:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA0116A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:02:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6741043D45 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:02:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j7AN2evf030845 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:40 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j7AN2d6P021282; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:39 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED43351215; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:02:38 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:02:48 -0000 --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. Thanks for the constructive criticism! Kris --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC+oeOWry0BWjoQKURAs1EAKDqY8dEKnAevx0ZP/mCuWeUgZNEewCg69rs krgDfuOZhXGNbX3/nPK5lfo= =BKCf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 23:10:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF6916A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:10:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CA743D49; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:10:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7ANAfvt001843; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:10:41 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id j7ANAfDo001841; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:10:41 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7AN6kR9013343; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:06:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j7AN6gFN013342; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:06:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:06:42 +0200 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-ID: <20050810230642.GA11794@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mail-Followup-To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <20050810210830.GA9197@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_sk no PHY found, next iteration X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:10:58 -0000 On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:19:41PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Juergen Lock wrote: > > Hi, > > > Thanks for the info on your http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/if_sk.html > > page. Here is a dmesg snippet of another sk problem (Asus A8V deluxe, > > 5.4-R amd64): > > > > skc0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem 0xfba00000-0xfba03fff irq 17 at device 10.0 on pci0 > > skc0: Reserved 0x4000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfba00000 > > skc0: Marvell Yukon Lite Gigabit Ethernet rev. (0x9) > > sk0: on skc0 > > sk0: bpf attached > > sk0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:a9:d5:6d > > skc0: no PHY found! > > device_attach: sk0 attach returned 6 > > skc0: [MPSAFE] > > > > Under TODO you have `unkown rev. 0x9 for Yukon Lite', seems this is it? > > Btw i also installed xp on the box and for that i had to fetch the > > latest driver off the marvell.com site too (yk51x86.sys), the one > > distributed by Asus didnt work. (nice, eh?) Linux's sk98lin driver > > (2.6.11 kernel) seems to have no problems tho. > > > > Any patches/info welcome... > > I am currently fixing another problem but in the meantime you can use > this one which should: > > * fix your problem > * catch a bus attach error > * improve locking > > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/EXPERIMENTAL/if_sk.c-rev1.108.diff Thanx. I had to MFC it, but it seems to get the nic working. I haven't tested networking extensively yet tho. (will do that later :) boot -v dmesg: skc0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem 0xfba00000-0xfba03fff irq 17 at device 10.0 on pci0 skc0: Reserved 0x4000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfba00000 skc0: interrupt moderation is 100 us skc0: Marvell Yukon Lite Gigabit Ethernet rev. (0x9) skc0: PN: Yukon 88E8001 skc0: EC: Rev. 1.3 skc0: MN: Marvell skc0: SN: AbCdEfG334454 skc0: chip ver = 0xb1 skc0: chip rev = 0x09 skc0: SK_EPROM0 = 0x10 skc0: SRAM size = 0x010000 sk0: on skc0 sk0: bpf attached sk0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:a9:d5:6d miibus0: on sk0 e1000phy0: on miibus0 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto skc0: [MPSAFE] Diff against RELENG_5_4_0_RELEASE: Index: if_sk.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/pci/if_sk.c,v retrieving revision 1.83.2.9 diff -u -r1.83.2.9 if_sk.c --- if_sk.c 28 Mar 2005 16:21:16 -0000 1.83.2.9 +++ if_sk.c 10 Aug 2005 22:54:19 -0000 @@ -94,12 +94,14 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include #include #include +#include #include @@ -195,8 +197,10 @@ static int sk_encap(struct sk_if_softc *, struct mbuf *, u_int32_t *); static void sk_start(struct ifnet *); +static void sk_start_locked(struct ifnet *); static int sk_ioctl(struct ifnet *, u_long, caddr_t); static void sk_init(void *); +static void sk_init_locked(struct sk_if_softc *); static void sk_init_xmac(struct sk_if_softc *); static void sk_init_yukon(struct sk_if_softc *); static void sk_stop(struct sk_if_softc *); @@ -242,6 +246,9 @@ static void sk_setmulti(struct sk_if_softc *); static void sk_setpromisc(struct sk_if_softc *); +static int sysctl_int_range(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS, int low, int high); +static int sysctl_hw_sk_int_mod(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS); + #ifdef SK_USEIOSPACE #define SK_RES SYS_RES_IOPORT #define SK_RID SK_PCI_LOIO @@ -474,6 +481,7 @@ free(sc->sk_vpd_readonly, M_DEVBUF); sc->sk_vpd_prodname = NULL; sc->sk_vpd_readonly = NULL; + sc->sk_vpd_readonly_len = 0; sk_vpd_read_res(sc, &res, pos); @@ -491,10 +499,12 @@ pos += sizeof(res); sc->sk_vpd_prodname = malloc(res.vr_len + 1, M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT); - for (i = 0; i < res.vr_len; i++) - sc->sk_vpd_prodname[i] = sk_vpd_readbyte(sc, i + pos); - sc->sk_vpd_prodname[i] = '\0'; - pos += i; + if (sc->sk_vpd_prodname != NULL) { + for (i = 0; i < res.vr_len; i++) + sc->sk_vpd_prodname[i] = sk_vpd_readbyte(sc, i + pos); + sc->sk_vpd_prodname[i] = '\0'; + } + pos += res.vr_len; sk_vpd_read_res(sc, &res, pos); @@ -508,6 +518,7 @@ sc->sk_vpd_readonly = malloc(res.vr_len, M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT); for (i = 0; i < res.vr_len; i++) sc->sk_vpd_readonly[i] = sk_vpd_readbyte(sc, i + pos); + sc->sk_vpd_readonly_len = res.vr_len; return; } @@ -790,6 +801,7 @@ struct ifmultiaddr *ifma; u_int8_t dummy[] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ,0 }; + SK_IF_LOCK_ASSERT(sc_if); /* First, zot all the existing filters. */ switch(sc->sk_type) { @@ -877,6 +889,8 @@ struct sk_softc *sc = sc_if->sk_softc; struct ifnet *ifp = &sc_if->arpcom.ac_if; + SK_IF_LOCK_ASSERT(sc_if); + switch(sc->sk_type) { case SK_GENESIS: if (ifp->if_flags & IFF_PROMISC) { @@ -1086,15 +1100,16 @@ sk_free_jumbo_mem(sc_if) struct sk_if_softc *sc_if; { - int retval = 0; struct sk_jpool_entry *entry; SK_JLIST_LOCK(sc_if); - /* Wait for the "inuse" list to drain. */ - if (!SLIST_EMPTY(&sc_if->sk_jinuse_listhead)) - retval = msleep(sc_if, &sc_if->sk_jlist_mtx, PZERO, - "skfjm", 5 * hz); + /* We cannot release external mbuf storage while in use. */ + if (!SLIST_EMPTY(&sc_if->sk_jinuse_listhead)) { + printf("sk%d: will leak jumbo buffer memory!\n", sc_if->sk_unit); + SK_JLIST_UNLOCK(sc_if); + return; + } while (!SLIST_EMPTY(&sc_if->sk_jfree_listhead)) { entry = SLIST_FIRST(&sc_if->sk_jfree_listhead); @@ -1230,13 +1245,15 @@ switch(command) { case SIOCSIFMTU: + SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); if (ifr->ifr_mtu > SK_JUMBO_MTU) error = EINVAL; else { ifp->if_mtu = ifr->ifr_mtu; ifp->if_flags &= ~IFF_RUNNING; - sk_init(sc_if); + sk_init_locked(sc_if); } + SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); break; case SIOCSIFFLAGS: SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); @@ -1248,7 +1265,7 @@ sk_setmulti(sc_if); } } else - sk_init(sc_if); + sk_init_locked(sc_if); } else { if (ifp->if_flags & IFF_RUNNING) sk_stop(sc_if); @@ -1259,12 +1276,12 @@ break; case SIOCADDMULTI: case SIOCDELMULTI: + SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); if (ifp->if_flags & IFF_RUNNING) { - SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); sk_setmulti(sc_if); - SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); error = 0; } + SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); break; case SIOCGIFMEDIA: case SIOCSIFMEDIA: @@ -1343,7 +1360,10 @@ * register represents 18.825ns, so to specify a timeout in * microseconds, we have to multiply by 54. */ - sk_win_write_4(sc, SK_IMTIMERINIT, SK_IM_USECS(200)); + if (bootverbose) + printf("skc%d: interrupt moderation is %d us\n", + sc->sk_unit, sc->sk_int_mod); + sk_win_write_4(sc, SK_IMTIMERINIT, SK_IM_USECS(sc->sk_int_mod)); sk_win_write_4(sc, SK_IMMR, SK_ISR_TX1_S_EOF|SK_ISR_TX2_S_EOF| SK_ISR_RX1_EOF|SK_ISR_RX2_EOF); sk_win_write_1(sc, SK_IMTIMERCTL, SK_IMCTL_START); @@ -1609,6 +1629,25 @@ goto fail; } + SYSCTL_ADD_PROC(device_get_sysctl_ctx(dev), + SYSCTL_CHILDREN(device_get_sysctl_tree(dev)), + OID_AUTO, "int_mod", CTLTYPE_INT|CTLFLAG_RW, + &sc->sk_int_mod, 0, sysctl_hw_sk_int_mod, "I", + "SK interrupt moderation"); + + /* Pull in device tunables. */ + sc->sk_int_mod = SK_IM_DEFAULT; + error = resource_int_value(device_get_name(dev), unit, + "int_mod", &sc->sk_int_mod); + if (error == 0) { + if (sc->sk_int_mod < SK_IM_MIN || + sc->sk_int_mod > SK_IM_MAX) { + printf("skc%d: int_mod value out of range; " + "using default: %d\n", unit, SK_IM_DEFAULT); + sc->sk_int_mod = SK_IM_DEFAULT; + } + } + /* Reset the adapter. */ sk_reset(sc); @@ -1639,7 +1678,7 @@ break; default: printf("skc%d: unknown ram size: %d\n", - sc->sk_unit, sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_EPROM0)); + sc->sk_unit, skrs); error = ENXIO; goto fail; } @@ -1752,16 +1791,74 @@ revstr = ""; } - /* Announce the product name. */ - device_printf(dev, "%s rev. %s(0x%x)\n", pname, revstr, sc->sk_rev); + /* Announce the product name and more VPD data if there. */ + device_printf(dev, "%s rev. %s(0x%x)\n", + pname != NULL ? pname : "", revstr, sc->sk_rev); + + if (bootverbose) { + if (sc->sk_vpd_readonly != NULL && + sc->sk_vpd_readonly_len != 0) { + char buf[256]; + char *dp = sc->sk_vpd_readonly; + uint16_t l, len = sc->sk_vpd_readonly_len; + + while (len >= 3) { + if ((*dp == 'P' && *(dp+1) == 'N') || + (*dp == 'E' && *(dp+1) == 'C') || + (*dp == 'M' && *(dp+1) == 'N') || + (*dp == 'S' && *(dp+1) == 'N')) { + l = 0; + while (l < *(dp+2)) { + buf[l] = *(dp+3+l); + ++l; + } + buf[l] = '\0'; + device_printf(dev, "%c%c: %s\n", + *dp, *(dp+1), buf); + len -= (3 + l); + dp += (3 + l); + } else { + len -= (3 + *(dp+2)); + dp += (3 + *(dp+2)); + } + } + } + device_printf(dev, "chip ver = 0x%02x\n", sc->sk_type); + device_printf(dev, "chip rev = 0x%02x\n", sc->sk_rev); + device_printf(dev, "SK_EPROM0 = 0x%02x\n", skrs); + device_printf(dev, "SRAM size = 0x%06x\n", sc->sk_ramsize); + } + sc->sk_devs[SK_PORT_A] = device_add_child(dev, "sk", -1); + if (sc->sk_devs[SK_PORT_A] == NULL) { + device_printf(dev, "failed to add child for PORT_A\n"); + error = ENXIO; + goto fail; + } port = malloc(sizeof(int), M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT); + if (port == NULL) { + device_printf(dev, "failed to allocate memory for " + "ivars of PORT_A\n"); + error = ENXIO; + goto fail; + } *port = SK_PORT_A; device_set_ivars(sc->sk_devs[SK_PORT_A], port); if (!(sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_CONFIG) & SK_CONFIG_SINGLEMAC)) { sc->sk_devs[SK_PORT_B] = device_add_child(dev, "sk", -1); + if (sc->sk_devs[SK_PORT_B] == NULL) { + device_printf(dev, "failed to add child for PORT_B\n"); + error = ENXIO; + goto fail; + } port = malloc(sizeof(int), M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT); + if (port == NULL) { + device_printf(dev, "failed to allocate memory for " + "ivars of PORT_B\n"); + error = ENXIO; + goto fail; + } *port = SK_PORT_B; device_set_ivars(sc->sk_devs[SK_PORT_B], port); } @@ -1769,7 +1866,11 @@ /* Turn on the 'driver is loaded' LED. */ CSR_WRITE_2(sc, SK_LED, SK_LED_GREEN_ON); - bus_generic_attach(dev); + error = bus_generic_attach(dev); + if (error) { + device_printf(dev, "failed to attach port(s)\n"); + goto fail; + } /* Hook interrupt last to avoid having to lock softc */ error = bus_setup_intr(dev, sc->sk_irq, INTR_TYPE_NET|INTR_MPSAFE, @@ -1930,6 +2031,21 @@ sk_start(ifp) struct ifnet *ifp; { + struct sk_if_softc *sc_if; + + sc_if = ifp->if_softc; + + SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); + sk_start_locked(ifp); + SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); + + return; +} + +static void +sk_start_locked(ifp) + struct ifnet *ifp; +{ struct sk_softc *sc; struct sk_if_softc *sc_if; struct mbuf *m_head = NULL; @@ -1938,7 +2054,7 @@ sc_if = ifp->if_softc; sc = sc_if->sk_softc; - SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); + SK_IF_LOCK_ASSERT(sc_if); idx = sc_if->sk_cdata.sk_tx_prod; @@ -1973,7 +2089,6 @@ /* Set a timeout in case the chip goes out to lunch. */ ifp->if_timer = 5; } - SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); return; } @@ -1988,8 +2103,10 @@ sc_if = ifp->if_softc; printf("sk%d: watchdog timeout\n", sc_if->sk_unit); + SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); ifp->if_flags &= ~IFF_RUNNING; - sk_init(sc_if); + sk_init_locked(sc_if); + SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); return; } @@ -2358,9 +2475,9 @@ CSR_WRITE_4(sc, SK_IMR, sc->sk_intrmask); if (ifp0 != NULL && !IFQ_DRV_IS_EMPTY(&ifp0->if_snd)) - sk_start(ifp0); + sk_start_locked(ifp0); if (ifp1 != NULL && !IFQ_DRV_IS_EMPTY(&ifp1->if_snd)) - sk_start(ifp1); + sk_start_locked(ifp1); SK_UNLOCK(sc); @@ -2546,7 +2663,7 @@ ifp = &sc_if->arpcom.ac_if; if (sc->sk_type == SK_YUKON_LITE && - sc->sk_rev == SK_YUKON_LITE_REV_A3) { + sc->sk_rev >= SK_YUKON_LITE_REV_A3) { /* Take PHY out of reset. */ sk_win_write_4(sc, SK_GPIO, (sk_win_read_4(sc, SK_GPIO) | SK_GPIO_DIR9) & ~SK_GPIO_DAT9); @@ -2650,21 +2767,32 @@ void *xsc; { struct sk_if_softc *sc_if = xsc; + + SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); + sk_init_locked(sc_if); + SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); + + return; +} + +static void +sk_init_locked(sc_if) + struct sk_if_softc *sc_if; +{ struct sk_softc *sc; struct ifnet *ifp; struct mii_data *mii; u_int16_t reg; + u_int32_t imr; - SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); + SK_IF_LOCK_ASSERT(sc_if); ifp = &sc_if->arpcom.ac_if; sc = sc_if->sk_softc; mii = device_get_softc(sc_if->sk_miibus); - if (ifp->if_flags & IFF_RUNNING) { - SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); + if (ifp->if_flags & IFF_RUNNING) return; - } /* Cancel pending I/O and free all RX/TX buffers. */ sk_stop(sc_if); @@ -2746,11 +2874,21 @@ printf("sk%d: initialization failed: no " "memory for rx buffers\n", sc_if->sk_unit); sk_stop(sc_if); - SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); return; } sk_init_tx_ring(sc_if); + /* Set interrupt moderation if changed via sysctl. */ + /* SK_LOCK(sc); */ + imr = sk_win_read_4(sc, SK_IMTIMERINIT); + if (imr != SK_IM_USECS(sc->sk_int_mod)) { + sk_win_write_4(sc, SK_IMTIMERINIT, SK_IM_USECS(sc->sk_int_mod)); + if (bootverbose) + printf("skc%d: interrupt moderation is %d us\n", + sc->sk_unit, sc->sk_int_mod); + } + /* SK_UNLOCK(sc); */ + /* Configure interrupt handling */ CSR_READ_4(sc, SK_ISSR); if (sc_if->sk_port == SK_PORT_A) @@ -2783,8 +2921,6 @@ ifp->if_flags |= IFF_RUNNING; ifp->if_flags &= ~IFF_OACTIVE; - SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); - return; } @@ -2796,7 +2932,7 @@ struct sk_softc *sc; struct ifnet *ifp; - SK_IF_LOCK(sc_if); + SK_IF_LOCK_ASSERT(sc_if); sc = sc_if->sk_softc; ifp = &sc_if->arpcom.ac_if; @@ -2867,6 +3003,29 @@ } ifp->if_flags &= ~(IFF_RUNNING|IFF_OACTIVE); - SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); + return; } + +static int +sysctl_int_range(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS, int low, int high) +{ + int error, value; + + if (!arg1) + return (EINVAL); + value = *(int *)arg1; + error = sysctl_handle_int(oidp, &value, 0, req); + if (error || !req->newptr) + return (error); + if (value < low || value > high) + return (EINVAL); + *(int *)arg1 = value; + return (0); +} + +static int +sysctl_hw_sk_int_mod(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS) +{ + return (sysctl_int_range(oidp, arg1, arg2, req, SK_IM_MIN, SK_IM_MAX)); +} Index: if_skreg.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/pci/if_skreg.h,v retrieving revision 1.20.2.5 diff -u -r1.20.2.5 if_skreg.h --- if_skreg.h 28 Mar 2005 16:21:16 -0000 1.20.2.5 +++ if_skreg.h 10 Aug 2005 22:23:38 -0000 @@ -376,6 +376,10 @@ #define SK_IMTIMER_TICKS 54 #define SK_IM_USECS(x) ((x) * SK_IMTIMER_TICKS) +#define SK_IM_MIN 10 +#define SK_IM_DEFAULT 100 +#define SK_IM_MAX 10000 + /* * The SK_EPROM0 register contains a byte that describes the * amount of SRAM mounted on the NIC. The value also tells if @@ -1437,10 +1441,12 @@ u_int8_t spare; char *sk_vpd_prodname; char *sk_vpd_readonly; + uint16_t sk_vpd_readonly_len; u_int32_t sk_rboff; /* RAMbuffer offset */ u_int32_t sk_ramsize; /* amount of RAM on NIC */ u_int32_t sk_pmd; /* physical media type */ u_int32_t sk_intrmask; + int sk_int_mod; struct sk_if_softc *sk_if[2]; device_t sk_devs[2]; struct mtx sk_mtx; From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 23:28:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E4716A41F; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:28:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A5C43D46; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:28:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7ANSJIK002668; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:28:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j7ANSJpQ002667; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:28:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:28:19 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:28:20 -0000 On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:02:38PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. > > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. > > Thanks for the constructive criticism! Your welcomed. Now, I'll wait to see how long it takes to commit the change. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 23:28:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5AC16A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:28:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45EC43D46 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:28:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7ANSJIK002668; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:28:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j7ANSJpQ002667; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:28:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:28:19 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:28:27 -0000 On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:02:38PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. > > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. > > Thanks for the constructive criticism! Your welcomed. Now, I'll wait to see how long it takes to commit the change. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 00:30:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7942216A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:30:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAF643D45 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:30:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout14/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j7B0UBsH019844 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([133.11.172.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j7B0U7iv015290 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:30:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:29:56 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050811.092956.74703209.chat95@mac.com> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <20050731125657.85923.qmail@web52310.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050731120013.9D6D316A421@hub.freebsd.org> <20050731125657.85923.qmail@web52310.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:30:12 -0000 In Message-ID: <20050731125657.85923.qmail@web52310.mail.yahoo.com> dR wrote: > OO is not 64-bit clean, according to the responses > that I received when I've asked about OO here. No OpenOffiec.org is 64 bit clean, IIRC someone reported OOo 1.1 is working under GNU/Linux Alpha. Port for amd64 is progressing and builds and partially works. But most difficult part, cpp-uno bridge, is not ready (for GNU/Linux). Please refer Pavel Janik's blog for details. His blog is always informative and correct: http://blog.janik.cz/ We are always waiting for someone who are interested in amd64 porting. thanks! -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 00:55:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4608916A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:55:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ED843D49 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:55:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j7B0t8vf009060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:55:09 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j7B0t86P031096; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:55:08 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 684475156C; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:55:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:55:08 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20050811005508.GA35453@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:55:10 -0000 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:28:19PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:02:38PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > >=20 > > > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. > > > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > > > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. > >=20 > > Thanks for the constructive criticism! >=20 > Your welcomed. Now, I'll wait to see how long it=20 > takes to commit the change. *sound of sarcasm going by Steve* Kris --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC+qHsWry0BWjoQKURAmPPAJ9FF52MXHmYoZj3PTJmSn7Wch1DqwCfaCDq uyTxEGYs9PFxqE4xqLFGL9M= =I03K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 05:11:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D813D16A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 05:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7556D43D46 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 05:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7B5BP4g008871; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:11:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j7B5BPrV008870; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:11:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:11:25 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050811051125.GA8733@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811005508.GA35453@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811005508.GA35453@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 05:11:26 -0000 On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:55:08PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:28:19PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:02:38PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. > > > > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > > > > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. > > > > > > Thanks for the constructive criticism! > > > > Your welcomed. Now, I'll wait to see how long it > > takes to commit the change. > > *sound of sarcasm going by Steve* > Touche. man ports BUGS Ports documentation is split over four places -- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, The Porter's Handbook, the ``Packages and Ports'' chapter of The FreeBSD Handbook, and this manual page. I believe sarcasm looks like 2000/06/30 ports/19594 new port: x11/qrash-sdl 2003/05/12 ports/52106 New port: java/javaws: Java Web Start 1.2 2003/12/21 ports/60472 [New Port] devel/doxymacs Doxymacs is Doxygen 2004/02/02 ports/62256 New port: chinese/mozilla-sclp 2004/02/22 ports/63238 New port: french/firefox-flp 2004/02/29 ports/63543 New port: chinese/phpbb-zh_TW 2004/03/15 ports/64307 [NEW PORT] databases/linux-unixODBC 2004/04/24 ports/65934 [NEW PORT] japanese/ja-xmms 2004/04/28 ports/66042 new port: www/suexec13 2004/05/04 ports/66246 new ports: textproc/docbook-utils 2004/05/10 ports/66476 [NEW PORT] misc/gaim-talkfilters 2004/09/10 ports/71550 New port: devel/plan9port 2004/09/13 ports/71693 [NEW PORT] x11-clocks/9clock 2004/09/21 ports/71953 New port: x11-themes/kde-splash-freebsd 2004/09/22 ports/71997 New port:math/webwork 2004/10/07 ports/72421 new port: py-Levenshtein 2004/10/12 ports/72550 [NEW PORT] mail/itraxp 2004/10/16 ports/72758 New port: latex-schedule 2004/10/26 ports/73152 [NEW PORT] graphics/chartdirector 2004/11/03 ports/73487 [New Port] devel/p5-Bundle-Perl6 2004/11/06 ports/73609 New port: x11-toolkits/wxhaskell 2004/11/18 ports/74086 New port:chinese/chmsee A viewer for Microsoft Help 2004/12/09 ports/74882 [New port] java/httpunit: web test framework 2004/12/15 ports/75130 [NEW PORT] www/mono-xsp: A light-weight web server 2004/12/21 ports/75369 new port net/p5-Perlbal 2004/12/30 ports/75643 New Port: x11/PyPanel (A lightweight transparency panel 2005/01/07 ports/75916 New port: net/decv 2005/01/17 ports/76365 NEW PORT net/xdb_auth_cpile A user auth/check module 2005/01/17 ports/76379 New port:biology/p5-Bio-Das 2005/01/27 ports/76748 New port: devel/hs-plugins. Loading Haskell plugins 2005/02/02 ports/76986 New port: print/pmx a pre-processor of MusixTeX 2005/02/10 ports/77359 New port: graphics/gephex Software-based interactive 2005/02/13 ports/77453 new port: print/ghostpcl 2005/02/14 ports/77471 New port: Device driver for Voicetronix OpenLine4 2005/02/14 ports/77495 new port: security/sav 2005/02/16 ports/77584 New ports: games/sear, games/sear-media. 2005/02/23 ports/77980 New Port: www/p5-POE-Component-Server-HTTPServer. 2005/02/24 ports/78012 [NEW PORT] net/abills: Billing system from 2005/03/06 ports/78473 New port: graphics/opencv 2005/03/14 ports/78830 New port: print/latex-auto-greek Auto-switch 2005/03/15 ports/78898 new ports chinese/lumaqq: General QQ-like UI widget 2005/03/19 ports/79021 New port: linux_base-fedora 2005/03/20 ports/79049 New port net-mgmt/netdump-server:RedHat server part 2005/03/30 ports/79346 New port: devel/gobo-eiffel. Libraries and tools 2005/04/17 ports/80043 New port: devel/metaEnv CWI MetaEnvironment. 2005/04/22 ports/80255 New Port : print/lpr-wrapper A user level printer 2005/04/26 ports/80352 New port: security/webfwlog Web-based firewall 2005/04/30 ports/80484 New port: security/synscan flexible, scriptable 2005/05/05 ports/80639 [NEW PORT] www/gwee: Tool to exploit command execution 2005/05/06 ports/80703 [NEW PORT] mail/postfix-policyd: Greylisting/sender 2005/05/09 ports/80826 [NEW PORT] net/unison-devel: A user-level file 2005/05/12 ports/80944 [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP 2005/05/13 ports/80968 [NEW PORT] cad/gplcver: A Verilog HDL simulator 2005/05/17 ports/81153 [NEW PORT] chinese/DFSongSd: Chinese TrueType fonts 2005/05/29 ports/81631 new port: german/tvbrowser 2005/06/07 ports/81983 New port: sysutils/pfind Tool for searching ports. 2005/06/12 ports/82155 New port: devel/dynamic-classes C++ dynamic class 2005/06/13 ports/82191 [new port] request to add port x11-toolkits/xforms-i18n 2005/06/14 ports/82218 [NEW PORT] japanese/guesswork: A PHP lightweight 2005/06/15 ports/82289 New Port: sysutils/p5-Sys-Mknod cpan perl module 2005/06/16 ports/82310 [new port] request: sysutils/initng 2005/06/17 ports/82354 [NEW PORT] mail/mimetic: A GPL MIME library 2005/06/19 ports/82427 [NEW PORT] security/amavisd-milter: Milter for 2005/06/21 ports/82501 New port: www/referrercop Filters referrer spam 2005/06/22 ports/82507 [new port] www/quixote-session2: quixote session 2005/06/22 ports/82527 New port: databases/pgmemcache Provides a PostgreSQL 2005/06/23 ports/82574 New port: print/php4-cpdf cpdf support for php4 2005/06/23 ports/82575 New port: print/php5-cpdf cpdf support for php5 2005/06/25 ports/82640 New port: lang/fpc2 2005/06/28 ports/82726 New port: databases/sqlplus Oracle SQL*Plus utility 2005/06/30 ports/82821 New port: graphics/py-gdchart2: python library 2005/07/01 ports/82843 [new port] sysutils/php4-pfpro: Trivial patches 2005/07/03 ports/82950 [NEW PORT] devel/subversion-ruby: Subversion with 2005/07/07 ports/83113 new port: misc/ree - A tool to dump your ROM extensions 2005/07/07 ports/83115 New port: games/exhaust - Redcode simulator easy to 2005/07/07 ports/83116 New port: games/exhaust-ma - Redcode simulator easy 2005/07/08 ports/83120 New port: games/exhaust-doc - Redcode simulator easy 2005/07/12 ports/83315 [NEW PORT] devel/simian: simlarity analysis for 2005/07/13 ports/83370 New port: print/pdfbox 2005/07/14 ports/83481 New port: sysutils/graphicboot 2005/07/18 ports/83653 [NEW PORT] graphics/py-cgkit2: Python Computer 2005/07/19 ports/83707 [NEW PORT] math/p5-Statistics-R: Controls the 2005/07/20 ports/83812 new port, security/sguil-sensor, update to correct 2005/07/21 ports/83838 [NEW PORT] print/latex-circ: A LaTeX package 2005/07/21 ports/83842 [NEW PORT] devel/cegui 2005/07/22 ports/83912 New Port: sysutils/psgconf modular system 2005/07/23 ports/83939 [New Port] games/cavezofphear - Boulder Dash 2005/07/23 ports/83950 [NEW PORT] mail/squirrelmail-change_ldap-plugin: 2005/07/23 ports/83957 new port: gtkextra2 2005/07/23 ports/83958 New Port: textproc/p5-Chess-PGN-Parse 2005/07/23 ports/83964 new port: security/sguil-server, resubmission to fix 2005/07/24 ports/83986 New port www/p5-Apache2-DebugFilter 2005/07/24 ports/83987 New port www/p5-Apache2-Filter-HTTPHeadersFixup 2005/07/25 ports/84039 New port: x11-fm/evidence Enlightened file-manager 2005/07/26 ports/84151 New port devel/p5-Algorithm-LCS Fast (XS) 2005/07/27 ports/84164 New Port: games/p5-Games-Sequential - Sequential 2005/07/27 ports/84165 New Port: games/p5-Games-AlphaBeta 2005/07/28 ports/84223 New port: www/skytemplate 2005/07/29 ports/84314 [New port] www/xshttpd 2005/07/29 ports/84319 New port print/cups-magicolor. 2005/07/30 ports/84329 New port: x11-fonts/proggy_fonts a monospaced 2005/07/30 ports/84342 New port: security/klamav 2005/07/31 ports/84369 new port, x11-toolkits/iwidgets, replacement 2005/08/01 ports/84414 [NEW PORT] x11-fm/tdfsb - A 3D Filesystem Browser 2005/08/01 ports/84430 [New Port] databases/pgcluster74-(server|client) 2005/08/01 ports/84462 New Port: audio/id3mtag Commandline masstagger 2005/08/02 ports/84474 new distfile location for net/gnome-vnc 2005/08/02 ports/84487 New port: textproc/p5-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved 2005/08/02 ports/84495 [NEW PORT] mail/policyd-sf: Greylisting/sender 2005/08/03 ports/84502 [New Port] mail/gmime2-sharp, slave to mail/gmime2 2005/08/03 ports/84513 [NEW PORT] security/p5-Data-Password: Perl extension 2005/08/03 ports/84521 New port: sysutils/nctop 2005/08/03 ports/84530 [New Port] net-mgmt/ourmon: Network Monitoring and 2005/08/04 ports/84545 New port:lang/pecl-runkit A PECL extension to modify 2005/08/04 ports/84546 New port: devel/BisonGen - General-purpose parser 2005/08/04 ports/84561 [new port] audio/xmms2 2005/08/05 ports/84570 New port: security/p5-Digest-SHA Perl 2005/08/05 ports/84585 New port: www/py-twistedWeb2 Twisted Web2 Server 2005/08/05 ports/84586 [NEW PORT] devel/rubygem-stream: Interface for 2005/08/05 ports/84587 [NEW PORT] devel/rubygem-rgl: Framework for graph 2005/08/06 ports/84604 New Port: devel/p5-Term-ReadPassword 2005/08/06 ports/84613 New port: java/javasvn 2005/08/06 ports/84614 New port: java/eclipse-javasvn 2005/08/06 ports/84617 [NEW PORT] www/p5-WWW-Mixi: "Perl module of 2005/08/06 ports/84623 devel/newfile: Add COMMENT= to template 2005/08/06 ports/84625 New port: lang/twelf A meta-logical framework for 2005/08/06 ports/84627 new port: security/ipguard - Tool designed to protect 2005/08/06 ports/84629 [NEW PORT] security/p5-Crypt-NULL: Perl implementation 2005/08/06 ports/84630 lioux New upstream dnspython (1.3.4) is available 2005/08/07 ports/84642 New port: net/pear-Net_LDAP 2005/08/07 ports/84643 New port: devel/pear-PHPDoc 2005/08/07 ports/84653 New port: audio/emu10kx 2005/08/07 ports/84655 [New port] sysutils/raincoat 2005/08/09 ports/84687 New port: www/selenium 2005/08/09 ports/84701 [NEW PORT] audio/cowbell: elegant id3 editing 2005/08/09 ports/84712 new port: archivers/ecm - Compresses CD images by 2005/08/09 ports/84721 [NEW PORT] deskutils/notification-daemon: desktop 2005/08/09 ports/84724 New port for MPFR library and fix broken libgmp4 port 2005/08/10 ports/84739 New Port: devel/p5-Danga-Socket 2005/08/10 ports/84753 [NEW PORT] chinese/acroread7-cht: Acrobat Reader7 2005/08/10 ports/84755 [NEW PORT] chinese/acroread7-chs: Acrobat Reader7 2005/08/10 ports/84757 new port: graphics/bmp2html - A bmp to html converter 2005/08/10 ports/84758 [NEW PORT] japanese/acroread7-jpn: Acrobat Reader7 2005/08/10 ports/84763 [NEW PORT] print/acroread7-dan: Acrobat Reader7 2005/08/10 ports/84768 [NEW PORT] print/acroread7-nld: Acrobat Reader7 2005/08/10 ports/84769 [NEW PORT] print/acroread7-esp: Acrobat Reader7 2005/08/10 ports/84771 [NEW PORT] Acrobat Reader7 2005/08/10 ports/84772 [NEW PORT] french/acroread7-fra: Acrobat Reader7 2005/08/10 ports/84775 new port: databases/kmysqladmin 2005/08/10 ports/84779 New port: net/py-radix - a python radix -- Steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 06:42:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFD216A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:42:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (reverse-82-141-57-8.dialin.kamp-dsl.de [82.141.57.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8866343D46 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:42:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (localhost.homeunix.org [127.0.0.1]) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7B6bEWg096555; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:37:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: (from ewinter@localhost) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j7B6bDwF096554; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:37:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ewinter) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:37:11 +0200 From: "Ernst W. Winter" To: NAKATA Maho Message-ID: <20050811063711.GA96514@lobo.homeunix.org> References: <20050731120013.9D6D316A421@hub.freebsd.org> <20050731125657.85923.qmail@web52310.mail.yahoo.com> <20050811.092956.74703209.chat95@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811.092956.74703209.chat95@mac.com> X-Phone: + 49-89-3075-6800 Organization: FreeBSD Evangelist X-Operating-System: FreeBSD lobo.homeunix.org 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ernst W. Winter" List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:42:42 -0000 On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, NAKATA Maho wrote: > In Message-ID: <20050731125657.85923.qmail@web52310.mail.yahoo.com> > dR wrote: > > > OO is not 64-bit clean, according to the responses > > that I received when I've asked about OO here. > > No OpenOffiec.org is 64 bit clean, IIRC someone reported > OOo 1.1 is working under GNU/Linux Alpha. > Port for amd64 is progressing and builds and partially works. > But most difficult part, cpp-uno bridge, is not ready (for GNU/Linux). > Please refer Pavel Janik's blog for details. His blog is > always informative and correct: > http://blog.janik.cz/ > > We are always waiting for someone who are interested in amd64 porting. > thanks! > -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org) well here we go this where it stopped with error, can anyone help so I can continue? -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- /usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/gcc-ooo/x86_64-portbld-freebsd5.4/3.4.1/lib/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd5.4/3.4.1/../../../libstdc++.a(eh_personality.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/local/gcc-ooo/x86_64-portbld-freebsd5.4/3.4.1/lib/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd5.4/3.4.1/../../../libstdc++.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake[1]: *** [libicuuc.so.26.0] Error 1 rm icunotif.ao ubrk.ao uhash_us.ao uiter.ao uvectr32.ao uloc.ao ucmndata.ao ubidiwrt.ao uscript.ao ucnvlat1.ao digitlst.ao udata.ao ushape.ao cwchar.ao icuserv.ao uidna.ao uhash.ao ucnvscsu.ao nameprep.ao ucnv2022.ao chariter.ao rbbirb.ao ustrfmt.ao ucnvisci.ao ucmp8.ao uresbund.ao ucnv_u16.ao uobject.ao uenum.ao mutex.ao ucnv_u32.ao brkiter.ao ucnv_lmb.ao ucnv.ao punycode.ao ustrtrns.ao caniter.ao uniset.ao rbbisetb.ao unames.ao ucnvbocu.ao ustring.ao propname.ao iculserv.ao locmap.ao rbbistbl.ao ucnv_io.ao putil.ao unistr.ao rbbitblb.ao rbbidata.ao ubidiln.ao ucnv_cnv.ao filestrm.ao brkdict.ao unifilt.ao strprep.ao ubidi.ao dbbi.ao umapfile.ao utrie.ao rbbinode.ao ucnv_cb.ao umemstrm.ao uprops.ao uresdata.ao umutex.ao locid.ao unorm_it.ao ucnv_err.ao resbund.ao usc_impl.ao util.ao ustrcase.ao ucat.ao unorm.ao ucnv_u8.ao udatamem.ao cmemory.ao uchar.ao utf_impl.ao ucln_cmn.ao ustrenum.ao normlzr.ao ucnv_u7.ao dbbi_tbl.ao schriter.ao uset.ao unifunct.ao uchriter.ao ucnvmbcs.ao rbbi.ao ucnvhz.ao ucnv_bld.ao rbbiscan.ao usetiter.ao uvector.ao cstring.ao gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel/work/icu/unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/icu/source/common' gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 2 dmake: Error code 2, while making './unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_icu' '---* tg_merge.mk *---' ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel/work/icu dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_all' '---* tg_merge.mk *---' *** Error code 255 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel. /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel lobo root 505--> -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- any help would eb appreciated and I could help in letting you know where it will keel over. Ernst From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 08:07:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B106816A41F; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:07:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl) Received: from galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl (galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl [149.156.96.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559CA43D45; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:07:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl) Received: by galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4D38EAF3DE; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:07:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:07:53 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kowalik To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050811080753.GA29303@uci.agh.edu.pl> References: <20050308111929.GA25011@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20050310120314.GB19552@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20050310154550.GA26567@uci.agh.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050310154550.GA26567@uci.agh.edu.pl> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-RELEASE (amd64) on LSILogic 1030 / mpt controller. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:07:59 -0000 Krzysztof Kowalik [kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl] wrote: > > > I'm trying, without success, to install the FreeBSD 5.3 on a Sun Fire > > > V40z (it's an amd64 box) on its LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 SCSI controller. > > Interesting. 5.3-RELEASE for x86 works on the same machine, same disks > > connected to the same controller without issues. > And 5-STABLE (installed snapshot from the end of January and upgraded to > a recent -STABLE) works fine. I love to answer to myself. And, despite my hopes, 5.4-RELEASE/amd64 does not work again. I think I'm getting unlucky recently. Will try 6.0-BETA2 on it now. -- Krzysztof Kowalik | () ASCII Ribbon Campaign Computer Center, AGH UST | /\ Support plain text e-mail From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 10:10:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A534516A420; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:10:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl) Received: from galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl (galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl [149.156.96.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD52843D49; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:10:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl) Received: by galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 540CEAF47C; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:10:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:10:45 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kowalik To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050811101045.GA14284@uci.agh.edu.pl> References: <20050308111929.GA25011@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20050310120314.GB19552@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20050310154550.GA26567@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20050811080753.GA29303@uci.agh.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811080753.GA29303@uci.agh.edu.pl> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-RELEASE (amd64) on LSILogic 1030 / mpt controller. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:10:47 -0000 Krzysztof Kowalik [kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl] wrote: [...] > > And 5-STABLE (installed snapshot from the end of January and upgraded to > > a recent -STABLE) works fine. I love to answer to myself. > And, despite my hopes, 5.4-RELEASE/amd64 does not work again. I think > I'm getting unlucky recently. And 6.0-BETA2 works fine. Did someone forget to merge some fixes for mpt from RELENG_5 to RELENG_5_4? Not that it really matters, if I can get 6.0 working on this box... -- Krzysztof Kowalik | () ASCII Ribbon Campaign Computer Center, AGH UST | /\ Support plain text e-mail From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 10:26:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24ABE16A41F; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:26:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB9B43D45; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:26:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-37-29.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.37.29]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1504AFDE; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:32:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id A450712B0F7; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:25:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurystheus.local ([192.168.1.67]) by localhost (eurystheus.locaL [192.168.1.67]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50111-05; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:25:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (eurystheus.local [192.168.1.67]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE27A12B02A; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:25:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42FB27AB.5050807@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:25:47 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050726 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Krzysztof Kowalik References: <20050308111929.GA25011@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20050310120314.GB19552@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20050310154550.GA26567@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20050811080753.GA29303@uci.agh.edu.pl> <20050811101045.GA14284@uci.agh.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <20050811101045.GA14284@uci.agh.edu.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-RELEASE (amd64) on LSILogic 1030 / mpt controller. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:26:49 -0000 Krzysztof Kowalik wrote: > And 6.0-BETA2 works fine. Did someone forget to merge some fixes for mpt > from RELENG_5 to RELENG_5_4? [...] It might be a candidate for an errata notice. Those fixes won't go without saying into a previously released branch. Björn From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 10:59:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894CF16A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:59:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com) Received: from aragon.netaktiv.com (ns3.netaktiv.com [62.212.103.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04A243D53 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:59:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aragon.netaktiv.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C46426B7 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:59:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aragon.netaktiv.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aragon [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22258-22 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:59:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from laika (laika [172.21.0.3]) by aragon.netaktiv.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38247426B6 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:59:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Mialon Pierre-Gilles Organization: NetAktiv To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:59:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200508091431.56773.pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508111259.41135.pierre-gilles@netaktiv.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at aragon.netaktiv.com Subject: Re: No dual cpu on S 2882 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:59:47 -0000 Le Mardi 09 Ao=FBt 2005 15:22, Claus Guttesen a =E9crit=A0: > > I try to use AMD64 on a heavy loaded web server, it always > > crashes when the load grow up, with no signal, it just reboot... > > > > What can I do to see it working ? Should I change to FreeBSD i3= 86 > > ? The only issue I found was to use only one cpu ... But this server > > needs both of them to work correctly ... > > > > options SCHED_ULE # Improved scheduler > > Change this line to SCHED_4BSD instead. Thanks for that !!! uptime = =20 12:59PM up 1 day, 18:31, 3 users, load averages: 0.30, 0.59, 0.71 > regards > Claus > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 Pierre-Gilles Mialon mialon@netaktiv.com From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 13:08:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF40316A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:08:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B4B43D45 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:08:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j7BD86vf015023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:08:06 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j7BD866P006804; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:08:06 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE7F1512BA; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:08:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:08:05 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20050811130805.GA48042@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811005508.GA35453@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050811051125.GA8733@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811051125.GA8733@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:08:07 -0000 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:11:25PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:55:08PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:28:19PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:02:38PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. > > > > > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > > > > > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks for the constructive criticism! > > >=20 > > > Your welcomed. Now, I'll wait to see how long it=20 > > > takes to commit the change. > >=20 > > *sound of sarcasm going by Steve* > >=20 >=20 > Touche. >=20 > man ports >=20 > BUGS > Ports documentation is split over four places -- > /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, The Porter's Handbook, the ``Packages and > Ports'' chapter of The FreeBSD Handbook, and this manual page. Do you have a specific point? Some of those 4 sources duplicate a lot of information, and also cover different areas. What about this, precisely, makes the Porters' Handbook "useless", in your opinion? > I believe sarcasm looks like >=20 > 2000/06/30 ports/19594 new port: x11/qrash-sdl [...] If you say so. Kris --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC+021Wry0BWjoQKURAgymAJ9t5f+VeVztq8nGJi4HbhjpQq4GzACfeZ2X bcOGE4Qygck8NmKAm3uU304= =2nzz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 13:18:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3AD16A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:18:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from yggdrasil.interstroom.nl (yggdrasil.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9E643D45 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:18:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180] helo=[192.168.1.42]) by yggdrasil with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1E3CxG-0003Kx-00; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:18:42 +0200 Message-ID: <42FB5030.4020500@axis.nl> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:18:40 +0200 From: Olaf Greve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.4.1.centos4 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <200508100427.j7A4RcKi088850@blue.virtual-estates.net> <1123687400.14039.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200508101311.17048.Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> In-Reply-To: <200508101311.17048.Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MailScanner-Information: Interstroom virusscan, please e-mail helpdesk@interstroom.nl for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: Subject: Asus NCT-D + Intel Xeon compatibility with FreeBSD 5.4-Release (amd64)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:18:44 -0000 Hi, Well, after doing some more research I found out that indeed I will have to make a switch of motherboard in order to be able to use the Adaptec 2200S PCI-64 66MHz U320 RAID controller to the fullest. Now, the only parts I can get for a reduced price are Asus parts. So, I have found the following candidate: Asus NCT-D (more info: http://www.asus.com/produ...l1=9&l2=39&l3=106) Interestingly enough, for once, even FreeBSD is mentioned (be it version 4.9) on the list of supported OSes. :) In terms of processors I have the following options: -Intel Xeon 2.8GHz, 800Mhz 1MB cache, Active 1+ ₮ 190 -Intel Xeon 3.0GHz, 800Mhz 1MB cache, Active ₮ 238 -Intel Xeon 3.2GHz, 800Mhz 1MB cache, Active ₮ 285 Now, just to be extremely sure that I do not again get hardware that will not fit my needs, can anyone tell me the following: -Does the combination of the Asus NCT-D + 1 of these mentioned Xeon processors fully support EM64T? -I couldn't find this particular board on the list of supported motherboards at http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html but does anyone know if this board + Xeon will work with the FreeBSD 5.4 Release (amd64) version? Thanks in advance, and kind regards, Olafo From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 14:10:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E85916A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:10:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (koyukuk.teamcool.net [209.161.34.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A995E43D45 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 6A54911EB1 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:10:09 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cochise.teamcool.net (unknown [192.168.1.57]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 34ED911EA4 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:10:09 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:13:48 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050811081348.2e37acbc.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20050614191426.GB13306@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> <20050613222428.GA3835@dragon.NUXI.org> <42AEA4DB.7020604@gneto.com> <20050614100144.GA1103@dragon.NUXI.org> <42AECA48.3090101@gneto.com> <20050614191426.GB13306@dragon.NUXI.org> Organization: Teamcool Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:10:15 -0000 On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:14:26 -0700 "David O'Brien" wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:15:04PM +0200, Martin Nilsson wrote: > > David O'Brien wrote: > > >>>>MSI K8D Master3 (MS-9161) > > >>It is very picky with the memories on the CPU that have 8 slots. MSI > > >>only supports 8 dimms on that CPU at 266MHz, 6*dimm at 333MHz. > > > > > >It depends on the revision of the Opteron used. Rev.E CPU's should > > >handle 8*DDR333 fine. > > > > Aha, nice to know I probably had rev.CG (2*246) as this was a couple of > > months ago. Are rev. E CPU:s out yet in models slower than the pricy 252? > > The slowest rev.E I know of is the 248. > I don't know what the speed of the rev.E 30W part is - probably slower. Was searching the archives and ran across this post. Also this from AMD website: So it would appear you can get rev.E 244 opterons? -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 14:38:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4297216A41F; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:38:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from rms06.rommon.net (rms06.rommon.net [212.54.5.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E774F43D49; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:38:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from [193.64.42.234] (dyn234.helenius.fi [193.64.42.234]) by rms06.rommon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD9833C1B; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:38:27 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <42FB62E3.4050908@he.iki.fi> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:38:27 +0300 From: Petri Helenius User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - net , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: libthr and 64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:38:32 -0000 Does libthr work on amd64 in RELENG_6? Pete From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 14:52:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1329716A42B for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:52:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCC143D62 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:52:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7BEqcWg011437; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:52:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j7BEqciu011436; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:52:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:52:38 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050811145238.GA11289@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <42ECB269.4030206@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811005508.GA35453@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050811051125.GA8733@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811130805.GA48042@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811130805.GA48042@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:52:41 -0000 On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:08:05AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:11:25PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:55:08PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:28:19PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:02:38PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness. > > > > > > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > > > > > > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the constructive criticism! > > > > > > > > Your welcomed. Now, I'll wait to see how long it > > > > takes to commit the change. > > > > > > *sound of sarcasm going by Steve* > > > > > > > Touche. > > > > man ports > > > > BUGS > > Ports documentation is split over four places -- > > /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, The Porter's Handbook, the ``Packages and > > Ports'' chapter of The FreeBSD Handbook, and this manual page. > > Do you have a specific point? Some of those 4 sources duplicate a lot > of information, and also cover different areas. What about this, > precisely, makes the Porters' Handbook "useless", in your opinion? Each of those documents contains material not found in the others. One may need to read *all* 4 to find the answer to their question. That is, if one knows all 4 exists. > > I believe sarcasm looks like > > > > 2000/06/30 ports/19594 new port: x11/qrash-sdl > > If you say so. > Oh the irony. This repartee started with my statement "To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness." I listed only those PR's with "new port" in the subject. Don't you find it somewhat useless for someone to submit a "new port" when it sits in the PR database for 5 years, 1 month, 12 days. Several of the others have sat in the PR database for 3 or more years. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 14:59:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC6516A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0645843D46 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:59:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j7BExivf028278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:59:44 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j7BExh6P012987; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:59:43 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 13F83513BD; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:59:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:59:42 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20050811145942.GA80118@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811005508.GA35453@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050811051125.GA8733@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811130805.GA48042@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050811145238.GA11289@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811145238.GA11289@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Griping about the ports collection (Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:59:45 -0000 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:52:38AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:08:05AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:11:25PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:55:08PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:28:19PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:02:38PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > To some extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefuln= ess. > > > > > > > It took me 4 hours to fix libgmp4 and add a new port for mpfr > > > > > > > because the Porter's Handbook is useless. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Thanks for the constructive criticism! > > > > >=20 > > > > > Your welcomed. Now, I'll wait to see how long it=20 > > > > > takes to commit the change. > > > >=20 > > > > *sound of sarcasm going by Steve* > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Touche. > > >=20 > > > man ports > > >=20 > > > BUGS > > > Ports documentation is split over four places -- > > > /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, The Porter's Handbook, the ``Packages= and > > > Ports'' chapter of The FreeBSD Handbook, and this manual page. > >=20 > > Do you have a specific point? Some of those 4 sources duplicate a lot > > of information, and also cover different areas. What about this, > > precisely, makes the Porters' Handbook "useless", in your opinion? >=20 > Each of those documents contains material not found in the others. > One may need to read *all* 4 to find the answer to their question. > That is, if one knows all 4 exists. To repeat: what, *precisely*, is missing from the Porters' Handbook that makes it "useless"? > > > I believe sarcasm looks like > > >=20 > > > 2000/06/30 ports/19594 new port: x11/qrash-sdl > >=20 > > If you say so. > >=20 >=20 > Oh the irony. This repartee started with my statement "To some > extent, the Ports Collection has outlived its usefulness." I listed > only those PR's with "new port" in the subject. Don't you find > it somewhat useless for someone to submit a "new port" when it sits > in the PR database for 5 years, 1 month, 12 days. Several of the > others have sat in the PR database for 3 or more years. Did you actually read the PR? The submitter is a committer, so it's his own responsibility to deal with, and the PR is suspended indicating it is not currently a candidate for committing. Most of the other old "new ports" have similar problems. Kris --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC+2feWry0BWjoQKURAnMMAJsH2Hq9TDhGYpaF5NrmzuEdM5kyHACg9t21 ihZ04ohTK0Z3Glex62Tw1QA= =Ldbr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 17:57:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9A316A427 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:57:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterk@maltanet.net) Received: from maltanet.net (mailer4.maltanet.net [194.158.37.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE2243D46 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:57:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterk@maltanet.net) Received: (qmail 32281 invoked by uid 513); 11 Aug 2005 17:57:01 -0000 Received: from 195.158.81.236 by mailer4.maltanet.net (envelope-from , uid 506) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(195.158.81.236):. Processed in 0.916945 secs); 11 Aug 2005 17:57:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.1]) ([195.158.81.236]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Aug 2005 17:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <42FB918C.8030701@maltanet.net> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:57:32 +0200 From: Peter Korsten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: nl-NL, nl, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20050802172840.GE71672@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050805225309.GA99941@luke.immure.com> <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811005508.GA35453@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050811051125.GA8733@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811130805.GA48042@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050811145238.GA11289@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811145942.GA80118@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050811145942.GA80118@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Griping about the ports collection (Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:57:37 -0000 Guys, As much as I enjoy heated debates, perhaps you should consider taking it off-line? - Peter From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 18:30:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F54316A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FBE43D45 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:30:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j7BIUGvf023398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:30:17 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j7BIUG6P023727; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:30:16 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D6FF75130F; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:30:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:30:14 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Peter Korsten Message-ID: <20050811183014.GA47906@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050810034707.GA49313@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050810061322.GA91774@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050810230238.GA3571@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050810232819.GA1035@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811005508.GA35453@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050811051125.GA8733@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811130805.GA48042@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050811145238.GA11289@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050811145942.GA80118@xor.obsecurity.org> <42FB918C.8030701@maltanet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42FB918C.8030701@maltanet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Griping about the ports collection (Re: OpenOffice2.0 64Bit ready?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:30:18 -0000 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:57:32PM +0200, Peter Korsten wrote: > Guys, >=20 > As much as I enjoy heated debates, perhaps you should consider taking it= =20 > off-line? I think that if someone makes a public claim about something, they should be prepared to publically provide evidence supporting their claim when challenged. Since Steve has been unable to do so, it does make sense to remove further discussion from the lists (Steve in fact already did this). Thanks, Kris --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC+5k2Wry0BWjoQKURAl7JAKDhSxvaLRpO/HqmffZo7fNSsjrelQCgpu3j Y9xDkkBIP/HlFl2OscFb6CM= =F2UK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 19:44:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF5B16A41F; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:44:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E4E43D45; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:44:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7BJi6HB013456; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:44:07 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id j7BJi6ta013454; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:44:06 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7BJcf2C014381; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:38:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j7BJcepK014380; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:38:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:38:40 +0200 To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Message-ID: <20050811193840.GA13133@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mail-Followup-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: qemu-system-x86_64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:44:32 -0000 After further installing my new amd64 box (yes, if_sk works now :) I just tried a few guests with qemu-system-x86_64: amd64 guests, no kqemu: KANOTIX-64-2005-03.iso (kernel 2.6.11 iirc, booted in text mode without `quiet') hangs after printing `Brought up 1 CPUs' 5.4-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso (FreeBSD) works (tested fixit -> cdrom which gives a shell) i386 guests, no kqemu (all work in i386-softmmu qemu): KANOTIX-2005-03.iso (kernel 2.6.11, booted in text mode without `quiet'): hangs after printing `Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.' (on i386-softmmu the next message is `Calibrating delay loop... ...') KNOPPIX_V3.8-2005-02-28-CeBIT_Edition.iso (kernel 2.6.11 SMP, booted in text mode) hangs too after printing `ACPI: Unable to locate RSDP' (has `quiet' in the boot config), same thing with `acpi=off' apart from the missing ACPI message KNOPPIX_V3.7-2004-12-08-DE.iso works with kernel 2.4.27 SMP, hangs with kernel 2.6.9 (type `knoppix26' at the boot prompt), also after printing `Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.' 5.4-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso panics after printing `avail memory ...' with a page fault, supervisor read, page not present at 0x1c, ip 0x8:0xc0762fbc which is vm_fault+440: the insn is cmpxchg %ecx,0x1c(%edx) which seems to be part of VM_OBJECT_LOCK(fs.first_object); so apparently fs.first_object is NULL. (line 291 of RELENG_5_4_0_RELEASE sys/vm/vm_fault.c, available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c revision 1.192.2.4, the disassebly can be viewed in fixit in i386-softmmu with kgdb /dist/boot/kernel/kernel /dev/mem, then: disas vm_fault) with kqemu: KNOPPIX_V3.7-2004-12-08-DE.iso crashes with: EAX=00000000 EBX=00000000 ECX=00000000 EDX=00000000 ESI=00000000 EDI=00000000 EBP=00000000 ESP=bffffeb0 EIP=08048074 EFL=00000203 [------C] CPL=3 II=0 A20=1 ES =0023 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 CS =0023 00000000 ffffffff 00cffa00 SS =002b 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 DS =0023 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 FS =0023 00000000 00000000 00000000 GS =0023 00000000 00000000 00000000 LDT=0068 c02abae0 00000027 c000822a TR =0060 c0316800 000000eb c0008931 GDT= c02aa820 0000045f IDT= c0316000 000007ff CR0=8005003b CR2=0806ac2c CR3=07fc8000 CR4=00000690 Unsupported return value: 0xffffffff 5.4-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso (FreeBSD, win98 hack disabled) crashes with: EAX=00000000 EBX=0002f2c2 ECX=00000008 EDX=000e9e80 ESI=00009e80 EDI=00020000 EBP=00094b6c ESP=00094b68 EIP=000276c6 EFL=00000202 [-------] CPL=3 II=0 A20=1 ES =0023 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 CS =002b 0000a000 ffffffff 00cffa00 SS =0033 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 DS =0023 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 FS =0023 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 GS =0023 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 LDT=0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008000 TR =0038 00001f98 00002067 00008900 GDT= 00009690 0000003f IDT= 00001e00 00000197 CR0=60000011 CR2=00000000 CR3=00000000 CR4=00000000 Unsupported return value: 0xffffffff Hope this is helpful to some... Juergen From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 07:09:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50BD16A420 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:09:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pierg75@yahoo.it) Received: from host130-93.pool8019.interbusiness.it (host130-93.pool8019.interbusiness.it [80.19.93.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBE9443D48 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:09:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pierg75@yahoo.it) Message-ID: <42FC4CF1.4090606@yahoo.it> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:17:05 +0200 From: pier MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig56D0992B70C48414932FA779" Subject: HP amd64 notebook X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:09:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig56D0992B70C48414932FA779 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all. I'm trying to boot Freebsd on this notebook, but with no success. I've tried all the releases, from 5.3 till 6.0-beta2. All of them hang at the boot....i tried to disable acpi, but always the same result. I don't know what to do anymore...if anyone have some suggestions, it will be appreciate. Thanx Pier --=20 Un uomo saggio impara dall' esperienza. Un uomo ancora pi=F9 saggio impara dall'esperienza degli altri --------------enig56D0992B70C48414932FA779 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC/Ez20EvuLV/O0yoRAri6AKC/rHt173PHYrnWjDN84lGh/VCvbACeP3Qb bKpPqIv1Ak9GWGWJ2Cg56jU= =icHA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig56D0992B70C48414932FA779-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 07:39:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F02616A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:39:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.lyubich@suzlon.de) Received: from mailc0926.dte2k.de (mail.t-intra.de [62.156.147.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D300E43D48 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:39:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.lyubich@suzlon.de) Received: from mailc0909.dte2k.de ([10.50.185.9]) by mailc0926.dte2k.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:39:45 +0200 Received: from server.Suzlon-HRO.local ([84.139.182.61]) by mailc0909.dte2k.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:39:44 +0200 Received: from sbec.Suzlon-HRO.local ([192.168.1.150] RDNS failed) by server.Suzlon-HRO.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:38:45 +0200 From: Lyubich Mykhailo To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42FC4CF1.4090606@yahoo.it> References: <42FC4CF1.4090606@yahoo.it> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:38:45 +0200 Message-Id: <1123832325.25799.5.camel@sbec.Suzlon-HRO.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2005 07:38:45.0515 (UTC) FILETIME=[DEBD05B0:01C59F10] Subject: Re: HP amd64 notebook X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:39:48 -0000 I got compaq nx9105 (also amd64) running with the following hints set hw.acpi.skip_timer_override="1" set hint.atkbd.0.flags="0x9" set hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" -- Lyubich, M. On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 09:17 +0200, pier wrote: > Hi all. > I'm trying to boot Freebsd on this notebook, but with no success. > I've tried all the releases, from 5.3 till 6.0-beta2. > All of them hang at the boot....i tried to disable acpi, but always > the same result. > I don't know what to do anymore...if anyone have some suggestions, it > will be appreciate. > Thanx > > > Pier From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 08:30:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38DD16A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3138443D48 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7C8UIi2060800 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:30:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j7C8UIJ0060794; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:30:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:30:18 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200508120830.j7C8UIJ0060794@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, "Hans-J. Ullrich" Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1209216A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:26:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [216.136.204.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E9143D49 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:26:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7C8QAHW092462 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:26:10 GMT (envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j7C8QABH092461; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:26:10 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <200508120826.j7C8QABH092461@www.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:26:10 GMT From: "Hans-J. Ullrich" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-2.3 Cc: Subject: amd64/84832: Installation crashes just at boot AMD64/ Version 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:30:18 -0000 >Number: 84832 >Category: amd64 >Synopsis: Installation crashes just at boot AMD64/ Version 5.4 >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-amd64 >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Aug 12 08:30:17 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Hans-J. Ullrich >Release: 5.4-amd64 >Organization: Ullrich-IT >Environment: Notebook Acer Aspire 1522WLMI lspci: 0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 0204 0000:00:00.1 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 1204 0000:00:00.2 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 2204 0000:00:00.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3204 0000:00:00.4 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 4204 0000:00:00.7 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 7204 0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI bridge [K8T800 South] 0000:00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Linksys, A Division of Cisco Systems [AirConn] INPROCOMM IPN 2220 Wireless LAN Adapter (rev 01) 0000:00:0b.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI7420 CardBus Controller 0000:00:0b.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI7420 CardBus Controller 0000:00:0b.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments PCI7x20 1394a-2000 OHCI Two-Port PHY/Link-Layer Controller 0000:00:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 0000:00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 80) 0000:00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 80) 0000:00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 80) 0000:00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 82) 0000:00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge 0000:00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06) 0000:00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 50) 0000:00:11.6 Communication controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. Intel 537 [AC97 Modem] (rev 80) 0000:00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge 0000:00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge 0000:00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge 0000:00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge 0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 0347 (rev a1) >Description: When installing on the notebook, the kernel or loader crashes. On request, there is a picture of it handy, made with bochs, but it shows the same, when installing directly. Best regards Hans >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 14:58:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEEB16A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (koyukuk.teamcool.net [209.161.34.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806A043D48 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 6A7D611EB1 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:58:24 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cochise.teamcool.net (unknown [192.168.1.57]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 1B3EE11EA4 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:58:24 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:58:23 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> Organization: Teamcool Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: workstation mobo X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:58:29 -0000 Greets All: I'm liking these amd opteron servers so much that I am considering building an amd based workstationn. Assumed it would be Athalon based but in searching archives I note that some folks seem to prefer the opterons for workstation use. Perhaps to some degree in reaction to the "chipset mess". I'm not averse to spending a bit more for the opteron system but it seems to me the Opteron's CPU heatsink/fan might be a bit noisy for workstation use. And I have buddies shouting in my ear to "stick w/ Intel" for workstation. But then I also know others who run AMD for their desktop machines. Any recommends based on current state of affairs in the ADM hardware world? TIA -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 15:23:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7245B16A420 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EB1F43D62 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 22311 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2005 15:22:56 -0000 Received: from maxwell6.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.212) by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 12 Aug 2005 15:22:56 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.246.166]) by maxwell6.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20050812152256.LBNT1233.maxwell6.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:22:56 +0800 Message-ID: <42FCBECE.7090107@pacific.net.sg> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:22:54 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken Gunderson References: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: workstation mobo X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:23:04 -0000 Hi, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > opteron system but it seems to me the Opteron's CPU heatsink/fan might I do not have experience with actual Intel and AMD CPUs but a lot with cooling of hot machines. AMD CPU use even a bit less power than Intel CPUs. But it could be that the off-the-shelf fans are not the best choice. Get the biggest heatsink you can find which still fits into the box with also a huge Papst fan. If this is still to much noise, take water. > be a bit noisy for workstation use. And I have buddies shouting in my > ear to "stick w/ Intel" for workstation. But then I also know others > who run AMD for their desktop machines. Any recommends based on current > state of affairs in the ADM hardware world? I would still take Tyan motherboards. Erich From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 15:35:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EB316A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:35:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (koyukuk.teamcool.net [209.161.34.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781D643D46 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:35:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id CBB0611EB1 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:35:10 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cochise.teamcool.net (unknown [192.168.1.57]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 7EB8111EA4 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:35:10 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:35:09 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050812093509.6ef36062.kgunders@teamcool.net> Organization: Teamcool Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: marvell sata controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:35:11 -0000 Howdy All: I've got a distributor who's out of stock on a board I want and suggesting an alternate that's very similar. The alternate board sports a "Marvell=AE SATA Controller chip", however, and from what I've been able to discern don't think this is supported under *BSD. Can anyone confirm? --=20 Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 20:09:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447216A41F; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:09:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AECE43D58; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:09:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7CK9ofp016153; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:09:50 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id j7CK9oVr016151; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:09:50 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7CK6AVW013897; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:06:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j7CK6ATU013896; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:06:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:06:09 +0200 To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050812200609.GA13719@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mail-Followup-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20050811193840.GA13133@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811193840.GA13133@saturn.kn-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: qemu-system-x86_64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:09:54 -0000 On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:38:40PM +0200, I wrote: >[...] > with kqemu: > > KNOPPIX_V3.7-2004-12-08-DE.iso crashes with: > EAX=00000000 EBX=00000000 ECX=00000000 EDX=00000000 > ESI=00000000 EDI=00000000 EBP=00000000 ESP=bffffeb0 > EIP=08048074 EFL=00000203 [------C] CPL=3 II=0 A20=1 > ES =0023 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 > CS =0023 00000000 ffffffff 00cffa00 > SS =002b 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 > DS =0023 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 > FS =0023 00000000 00000000 00000000 > GS =0023 00000000 00000000 00000000 > LDT=0068 c02abae0 00000027 c000822a > TR =0060 c0316800 000000eb c0008931 > GDT= c02aa820 0000045f > IDT= c0316000 000007ff > CR0=8005003b CR2=0806ac2c CR3=07fc8000 CR4=00000690 > Unsupported return value: 0xffffffff > > 5.4-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso (FreeBSD, win98 hack disabled) crashes with: > EAX=00000000 EBX=0002f2c2 ECX=00000008 EDX=000e9e80 > ESI=00009e80 EDI=00020000 EBP=00094b6c ESP=00094b68 > EIP=000276c6 EFL=00000202 [-------] CPL=3 II=0 A20=1 > ES =0023 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 > CS =002b 0000a000 ffffffff 00cffa00 > SS =0033 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 > DS =0023 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 > FS =0023 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 > GS =0023 0000a000 ffffffff 00cff300 > LDT=0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008000 > TR =0038 00001f98 00002067 00008900 > GDT= 00009690 0000003f > IDT= 00001e00 00000197 > CR0=60000011 CR2=00000000 CR3=00000000 CR4=00000000 > Unsupported return value: 0xffffffff I forgot to say that all FreeBSD-amd64 kqemu crashes leave the same message in dmesg: kqemu: aborting: Unexpected exception 0x0d in monitor space CS:EIP=f180:ffff900000001729 And I just tested kqemu-amd64 on debian sarge: KNOPPIX_V3.7-2004-12-08-DE.iso booted in textmode (kernel 2.4.27 SMP) prints `Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 01:03' 5.4-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso crashes in the bootloader with the following data: int=0000000d err=00000000 efl=00010206 eip=0000f8a8 eax=0004371c ebx=0004371c ecx=00000065 edx=00000000 esi=00058f54 edi=00042a64 ebp=00094954 esp=0009493c cs=002b ds=0000 es=0000 fs=0000 gs=0000 ss=0033 cs:eip=83 7e 20 00 75 33 85 db-74 61 89 1c 24 e8 f6 84 00 00 85 c0 74 10 c7 44-24 04 c7 dc 02 00 89 34 ss:esp=64 2a 04 00 08 00 00 00-5c 33 03 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 5c 33 03 00-80 49 09 00 64 f7 00 00 BTX halted I would be interested to know which guests do work with kqemu-amd64, and on what hosts... Juergen From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 20:56:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D7716A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:56:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9270A43D5F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7CKtxxp019854; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:55:59 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id j7CKtxIA019852; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:55:59 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7CKrvL2015796; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:53:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j7CKruCd015795; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:53:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:53:56 +0200 To: Ken Gunderson Message-ID: <20050812205356.GA15463@saturn.kn-bremen.de> References: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: workstation mobo X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:56:06 -0000 On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:58:23AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > Greets All: > > I'm liking these amd opteron servers so much that I am considering > building an amd based workstationn. Assumed it would be Athalon based > but in searching archives I note that some folks seem to prefer the > opterons for workstation use. Perhaps to some degree in reaction > to the "chipset mess". I'm not averse to spending a bit more for the > opteron system but it seems to me the Opteron's CPU heatsink/fan might > be a bit noisy for workstation use. And I have buddies shouting in my > ear to "stick w/ Intel" for workstation. But then I also know others > who run AMD for their desktop machines. Any recommends based on current > state of affairs in the ADM hardware world? I just got a new box with an Asus A8V Deluxe board (VIA K8T800 Pro, Socket 939), and so far everything seems to be working. The only unusual thing i had to do for FreeBSD (5.4-R) was adding a patch to the sk nic driver (see other thread.) Juergen From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 22:33:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC0716A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:33:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (koyukuk.teamcool.net [209.161.34.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AF243D46 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:33:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 09A4311EB9 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:33:37 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cochise.teamcool.net (unknown [192.168.1.57]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id C8A7711EB8 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:33:36 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:33:35 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050812163335.0aa48954.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20050812205356.GA15463@saturn.kn-bremen.de> References: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050812205356.GA15463@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Organization: Teamcool Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: workstation mobo X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:33:40 -0000 On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:53:56 +0200 Juergen Lock wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:58:23AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > Greets All: > > > > I'm liking these amd opteron servers so much that I am considering > > building an amd based workstationn. Assumed it would be Athalon based > > but in searching archives I note that some folks seem to prefer the > > opterons for workstation use. Perhaps to some degree in reaction > > to the "chipset mess". I'm not averse to spending a bit more for the > > opteron system but it seems to me the Opteron's CPU heatsink/fan might > > be a bit noisy for workstation use. And I have buddies shouting in my > > ear to "stick w/ Intel" for workstation. But then I also know others > > who run AMD for their desktop machines. Any recommends based on current > > state of affairs in the ADM hardware world? > > I just got a new box with an Asus A8V Deluxe board (VIA K8T800 Pro, > Socket 939), and so far everything seems to be working. The only > unusual thing i had to do for FreeBSD (5.4-R) was adding a patch > to the sk nic driver (see other thread.) Thanks to all who responded. I've got a buddy who swears that the 2MB L2 cache P4's, e.g. the 640 et.al. are kicking butt on the Athalons. I know to some degree it boils down to personal preference and don't want to beat the topic to death but input is appreciated since I've mostly been building opteron as of late (and xeons before that) server class machines so am kind of out of date on the workstation side of things. -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 23:46:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD47C16A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from lakecmmtar05.coxmail.com (lakecmmtar05.coxmail.com [68.99.120.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFB243D45 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from sentinelchicken.net ([70.183.13.213]) by lakecmmtar05.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP id <20050812234624.IWUP5873.lakecmmtar05.coxmail.com@sentinelchicken.net> for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:46:24 -0400 Received: (qmail 4260 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2005 23:55:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO numbuscus.sentinelchicken.net) (10.0.0.2) by samson.sentinelchicken.net with SMTP; 12 Aug 2005 23:55:14 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 4277 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:42:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:42:46 -0400 From: Jason Morgan To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050812234246.GF2815@sentinelchicken.net> References: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050812205356.GA15463@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20050812163335.0aa48954.kgunders@teamcool.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050812163335.0aa48954.kgunders@teamcool.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: workstation mobo X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:46:25 -0000 On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:33:35PM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:53:56 +0200 > Juergen Lock wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:58:23AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > > Greets All: > > > > > > I'm liking these amd opteron servers so much that I am considering > > > building an amd based workstationn. Assumed it would be Athalon based > > > but in searching archives I note that some folks seem to prefer the > > > opterons for workstation use. Perhaps to some degree in reaction > > > to the "chipset mess". I'm not averse to spending a bit more for the > > > opteron system but it seems to me the Opteron's CPU heatsink/fan might > > > be a bit noisy for workstation use. And I have buddies shouting in my > > > ear to "stick w/ Intel" for workstation. But then I also know others > > > who run AMD for their desktop machines. Any recommends based on current > > > state of affairs in the ADM hardware world? > > > > I just got a new box with an Asus A8V Deluxe board (VIA K8T800 Pro, > > Socket 939), and so far everything seems to be working. The only > > unusual thing i had to do for FreeBSD (5.4-R) was adding a patch > > to the sk nic driver (see other thread.) > > Thanks to all who responded. I've got a buddy who swears that the 2MB > L2 cache P4's, e.g. the 640 et.al. are kicking butt on the Athalons. I > know to some degree it boils down to personal preference and don't want > to beat the topic to death but input is appreciated since I've mostly > been building opteron as of late (and xeons before that) server class > machines so am kind of out of date on the workstation side of things. If you're simply looking for the most powerful system you can get, I'd check out Toms Hardware or one of the other numerous sites that have up-to-date benchmarking. If you're worried about FreeBSD and the hardware getting along, then that's another matter. I have been running a socket 939 AMD 3500+ for some time - never had an issue. However, it's not usually the CPU that will give you issues in FreeBSD. My advice is to find the best MBs out there (ie work well with FreeBSD) and make your choice based on the features provided by those MBs. Jason From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 13 01:17:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC4216A41F for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:17:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (koyukuk.teamcool.net [209.161.34.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3802443D45 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:17:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 5944B11EB9 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:17:04 -0600 (MDT) Received: from cochise.teamcool.net (unknown [192.168.1.57]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 1CBBC11EB8 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:17:04 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:17:03 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050812191703.6d8361ab.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20050812234246.GF2815@sentinelchicken.net> References: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050812205356.GA15463@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20050812163335.0aa48954.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050812234246.GF2815@sentinelchicken.net> Organization: Teamcool Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: workstation mobo X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:17:07 -0000 On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:42:46 -0400 Jason Morgan wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:33:35PM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:53:56 +0200 > > Juergen Lock wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:58:23AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > > > Greets All: > > > > > > > > I'm liking these amd opteron servers so much that I am considering > > > > building an amd based workstationn. Assumed it would be Athalon based > > > > but in searching archives I note that some folks seem to prefer the > > > > opterons for workstation use. Perhaps to some degree in reaction > > > > to the "chipset mess". I'm not averse to spending a bit more for the > > > > opteron system but it seems to me the Opteron's CPU heatsink/fan might > > > > be a bit noisy for workstation use. And I have buddies shouting in my > > > > ear to "stick w/ Intel" for workstation. But then I also know others > > > > who run AMD for their desktop machines. Any recommends based on current > > > > state of affairs in the ADM hardware world? > > > > > > I just got a new box with an Asus A8V Deluxe board (VIA K8T800 Pro, > > > Socket 939), and so far everything seems to be working. The only > > > unusual thing i had to do for FreeBSD (5.4-R) was adding a patch > > > to the sk nic driver (see other thread.) > > > > Thanks to all who responded. I've got a buddy who swears that the 2MB > > L2 cache P4's, e.g. the 640 et.al. are kicking butt on the Athalons. I > > know to some degree it boils down to personal preference and don't want > > to beat the topic to death but input is appreciated since I've mostly > > been building opteron as of late (and xeons before that) server class > > machines so am kind of out of date on the workstation side of things. > > If you're simply looking for the most powerful system you can get, I'd > check out Toms Hardware or one of the other numerous sites that have > up-to-date benchmarking. If you're worried about FreeBSD and the > hardware getting along, then that's another matter. I have been running > a socket 939 AMD 3500+ for some time - never had an issue. However, > it's not usually the CPU that will give you issues in FreeBSD. My > advice is to find the best MBs out there (ie work well with FreeBSD) > and make your choice based on the features provided by those MBs. Thanks for the suggestion but I pretty much don't believe anything I read at Tom's anymore.... >;-P I can do some research other places but basically if they run a single banner ad then their opinions are suspect. Whereas... freebsd-amd64 ROCKS!!! -;) This doesn't need to be "most powerful system" I can get. I'll be targeting the "sweet spot" w.r.t. "bang for the buck". Don't need to be on the bleeding edge. These boards are making the short list: -Abit AV8 -Abit AX8 (anyone can report how this runs under 5.x?) -Asus A8V Deluxe -Asus A8V-E Deluxe The AX8 is probably top of my list at this point in time assuming I can get it to run under 5.x. Hence I would be particularly interested if anybody could confirm one way or the other. I like Asus mb's but also have a fondness for Abit since I have about 8 AbitBX6r2's w/700MHz PIII's still going strong after all these years ... I don't really need PCI-E at this time but all other things being equal it would be nice to add a bit more future proofing.... -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 13 01:58:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C715516A41F for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:58:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r.mahoney@iconz.co.nz) Received: from frigg.iconz.co.nz (etrn.iconz.co.nz [210.48.22.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2192543D46 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:58:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r.mahoney@iconz.co.nz) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frigg.iconz.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD0D147F3; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:58:55 +1200 (NZST) Received: from frigg.iconz.co.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (frigg [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12825-04; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:58:52 +1200 (NZST) Received: from 192.168.1.4 (firewall.indica-et-buddhica.org [210.48.84.26]) by frigg.iconz.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A834147C4; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:58:33 +1200 (NZST) From: Richard MAHONEY To: Ken Gunderson In-Reply-To: <20050812191703.6d8361ab.kgunders@teamcool.net> References: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050812205356.GA15463@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20050812163335.0aa48954.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050812234246.GF2815@sentinelchicken.net> <20050812191703.6d8361ab.kgunders@teamcool.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1123898308.29883.2.camel@proliant> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.325 Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:58:28 +1200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at frigg.iconz.co.nz Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: workstation mobo X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: r.mahoney@iconz.co.nz List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:58:58 -0000 On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 13:17, Ken Gunderson wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:42:46 -0400 > Jason Morgan wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:33:35PM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:53:56 +0200 > > > Juergen Lock wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:58:23AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > > > > Greets All: > > > > > > > > > > I'm liking these amd opteron servers so much that I am considering > > > > > building an amd based workstationn. Assumed it would be Athalon based > > > > > but in searching archives I note that some folks seem to prefer the > > > > > opterons for workstation use. Perhaps to some degree in reaction > > > > > to the "chipset mess". I'm not averse to spending a bit more for the > > > > > opteron system but it seems to me the Opteron's CPU heatsink/fan might > > > > > be a bit noisy for workstation use. And I have buddies shouting in my > > > > > ear to "stick w/ Intel" for workstation. But then I also know others > > > > > who run AMD for their desktop machines. Any recommends based on current > > > > > state of affairs in the ADM hardware world? > > > > > > > > I just got a new box with an Asus A8V Deluxe board (VIA K8T800 Pro, > > > > Socket 939), and so far everything seems to be working. The only > > > > unusual thing i had to do for FreeBSD (5.4-R) was adding a patch > > > > to the sk nic driver (see other thread.) > > > > > > Thanks to all who responded. I've got a buddy who swears that the 2MB > > > L2 cache P4's, e.g. the 640 et.al. are kicking butt on the Athalons. I > > > know to some degree it boils down to personal preference and don't want > > > to beat the topic to death but input is appreciated since I've mostly > > > been building opteron as of late (and xeons before that) server class > > > machines so am kind of out of date on the workstation side of things. This sort of beast may be worth considering: http://www.sun.com/desktop/workstation/w2100z/index.jsp Supports a good variety of OS's so BSD may be possible. Best, Richard -- Richard MAHONEY | internet: indica-et-buddhica.org Littledene | telephone / telefax (man.): ++64 3 312 1699 Bay Road | cellular: ++64 25 829 986 OXFORD, NZ | e-mail: r.mahoney[use"@"]iconz.co.nz From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 13 02:07:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB20B16A41F for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ogden@yem.eng.utah.edu) Received: from yem.eng.utah.edu (yem.eng.utah.edu [155.98.111.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CA143D46 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ogden@yem.eng.utah.edu) Received: from ogden by yem.eng.utah.edu with local (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1E3lQe-000LQe-S5; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:07:20 -0600 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:07:20 -0600 From: Mark Ogden To: Richard MAHONEY Message-ID: <20050813020720.GA82353@yem.eng.utah.edu> References: <20050812085823.645f5b39.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050812205356.GA15463@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20050812163335.0aa48954.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050812234246.GF2815@sentinelchicken.net> <20050812191703.6d8361ab.kgunders@teamcool.net> <1123898308.29883.2.camel@proliant> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1123898308.29883.2.camel@proliant> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: Mark L Ogden Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: workstation mobo X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:07:48 -0000 Richard MAHONEY on Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:58:28PM +1200 wrote: > This sort of beast may be worth considering: > > http://www.sun.com/desktop/workstation/w2100z/index.jsp > > Supports a good variety of OS's so BSD may be possible. I happen to have one (model 244 CPUs) of these, and I have not been able to get Freebsd5.4 to run on it. The install goes fine but once the reboot happens, the usb keyboard and mouse don't work. I have remotely rebuilt the kernel not removing anything (just using generic) and it still fails. I sent mail a while back to the list but have heard nothing. I have not retired this machine using FreeBSD 5.4 in about a week but may try again this weekend. -Mark > Best, > > Richard From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 13 15:59:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3740C16A41F for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:59:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825AD43D45 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:59:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.1.153] ([158.69.83.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7DGBQUu028709; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:11:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42FE18F4.5020402@samsco.org> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:59:48 -0400 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken Gunderson References: <20050812093509.6ef36062.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20050812093509.6ef36062.kgunders@teamcool.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: marvell sata controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:59:58 -0000 Ken Gunderson wrote: > Howdy All: > > I've got a distributor who's out of stock on a board I want and > suggesting an alternate that's very similar. The alternate board sports > a "MarvellŪ SATA Controller chip", however, and from what I've been able > to discern don't think this is supported under *BSD. Can anyone > confirm? > Marvell doesn't typically sell their 805x controller chips for use as bare SATA controllers. Usually they are hidden behind a raid engine, or they are intended for use in software RAID. As such, Marvell absolutely does not provide programming specs on these chips, so writing a open source driver is impossible. FreeBSD does have support for the Highpoint flavor of Marvell software RAID, so you might be able to coerce the pci attach code in that driver to think that your chip is a highpoint product. The better approach would probably be to find out how your supplier got ahold of this chip and what the intended function/purpose of the chip is, then contact the sub-vendor that is responsbile for that function. There are also possibilities in reverse engineering, but I'm tainted on Marvell and cannot comment further. Scott From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 13 16:09:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2271616A41F for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:09:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@jetnet.co.uk) Received: from kosh.jetnet.co.uk (kosh.jetnet.co.uk [80.87.128.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64D343D46 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:09:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@jetnet.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kosh.jetnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743BA316E9 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:09:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kosh.jetnet.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.jetnet.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 83590-01 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:09:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (82-69-108-39.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.108.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kosh.jetnet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CDC20CEF for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:09:19 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <42FE1B2F.7020403@jetnet.co.uk> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:09:19 +0100 From: David Reid User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050808) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jetnet.co.uk Subject: nve driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:09:23 -0000 I've recently built an AMD64 system running 6-CURRENT. I can't run on 5.4 as the raid isn't detected :-( The MB is an ABit AN-8 Ultra and while most components are detected and used correctly, the on board network doesn't work. It's detected correctly and I have an nve0 interface, but any attempt to configure it results in timed out messages. dhclient fails and if I manually configure the card it doesn't send or receive anything. I've got a PCI card in the machine for now, but would ideally like to use the onboard interface! Any ideas? david From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 13 16:32:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ED916A41F; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl) Received: from galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl (galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl [149.156.96.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB2B43D45; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:32:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kkowalik@uci.agh.edu.pl) Received: by galaxy.uci.agh.edu.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9BFB5AF4FA; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:32:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:32:09 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kowalik To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050813163209.GA10594@uci.agh.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Sun Fire v40z, FreeBSD/amd64 and 16GB RAM. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:32:12 -0000 Hello. Is this normal, that in a box with 16GB, mpt(4) and isp(4) startup takes just 7 minutes, while after adding a nice MAXMEM=(2048*1024) option to the kernel it drops suddenly to ~ minute? And I sort of suspect, that my issues with panics when using a FC array via the ISP2312 controller are quite related to the amound of the memory. Looks like those mentioned aboce drivers are not exactly 4+GB-memory-clean, or whatever. -- Krzysztof Kowalik | () ASCII Ribbon Campaign Computer Center, AGH UST | /\ Support plain text e-mail