From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 23:15:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C6E16A441 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:15:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.village.org (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD94343D48 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:15:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5TNEbU5064691 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:14:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:16:20 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050629.171620.99878775.imp@bsdimp.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ATMEL AT91RM9200 support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:15:42 -0000 Does FreeBSD/arm have any support for the ATMEL AT91RM9200? Warner From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 23:24:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E98E16A41C for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (cognet.ci0.org [80.65.224.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E1143D48 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (localhost.ci0.org [127.0.0.1]) by dong.ci0.org (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5TNuFdn037320; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:56:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by dong.ci0.org (8.13.3/8.12.11/Submit) id j5TNuEAJ037319; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:56:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:56:14 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20050629235614.GA37270@ci0.org> References: <20050629.171620.99878775.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050629.171620.99878775.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATMEL AT91RM9200 support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:24:48 -0000 On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:16:20PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Does FreeBSD/arm have any support for the ATMEL AT91RM9200? > Not yet, however there are bits in tree to support ARM920T, so supporting, at least basically, that flavor should be quite easy. Cheers, Olivier From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 23:33:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E70416A41C for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.village.org (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354FD43D1F for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5TNWVeK064823; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:32:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:34:14 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050629.173414.59921112.imp@bsdimp.com> To: mlfbsd@ci0.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20050629235614.GA37270@ci0.org> References: <20050629.171620.99878775.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050629235614.GA37270@ci0.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATMEL AT91RM9200 support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:33:56 -0000 In message: <20050629235614.GA37270@ci0.org> Olivier Houchard writes: : On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:16:20PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > Does FreeBSD/arm have any support for the ATMEL AT91RM9200? : : Not yet, however there are bits in tree to support ARM920T, so supporting, : at least basically, that flavor should be quite easy. I noticed that. Maybe I'll see if I can track down an eval board and give it a spin. Warner