From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 11:14:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CA116A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:14:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from unixtools@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay21-f14.bay21.hotmail.com [65.54.233.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3593943D49; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:14:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from unixtools@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:14:26 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 203.199.109.161 by by21fd.bay21.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:14:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.199.109.161] X-Originating-Email: [unixtools@hotmail.com] X-Sender: unixtools@hotmail.com From: "Sunil Sunder Raj" To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:14:26 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2005 11:14:26.0918 (UTC) FILETIME=[E842A860:01C565D1] Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:14:27 -0000 Hi, I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is ext_if="fxp0" internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }" rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> $internal_smtp_servers round-robin sticky-address If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4 from its table. Regards Sunil Sunder Raj From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 13:09:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5BE16A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:09:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A4643D1F; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:09:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521B11CC23; Tue, 31 May 2005 15:09:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F891CC22; Tue, 31 May 2005 15:08:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:05:59 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <751754961.20050531150559@rulez.sk> To: "Sunil Sunder Raj" In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-2.82, AWL=0.261, PRIORITY_NO_NAME=1.185] X-Spam-Level: Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:09:08 -0000 Hi Sunil, Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 1:14:26 PM, you Cannot open file "C\TXT COOKIES\repl= y-en.txt":: > Hi, > I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster with t= he > load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is > ext_if=3D"fxp0" > internal_smtp_servers=3D"{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }" > rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> $internal_smtp_servers > round-robin sticky-address > If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4 from = its > table. people use CARP for this, don't they? > Regards > Sunil Sunder Raj --=20 Best regards +----------=3D=3D/\/\=3D=3D----------+ (__) FreeBSD | DanGer | \\\'',) The | DanGer@IRCnet ICQ261701668 | \/ \ ^ Power | http://danger.rulez.sk | .\._/_) To +----------=3D=3D\/\/=3D=3D----------+ Serve [ ANIMANI.COM loaded SOCIALIF.DAT removed from memory. ] From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 13:10:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B8916A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com) Received: from ender.liquidneon.com (ender.liquidneon.com [64.78.150.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943CE43D1D; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770EEA6C70; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:10:20 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ender.liquidneon.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.liquidneon.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89734-06; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:10:20 -0600 (MDT) Received: by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3CA5CA6C6E; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:10:20 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:10:20 -0600 From: Brad Davis To: Sunil Sunder Raj Message-ID: <20050531131020.GA50106@ender.liquidneon.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ender.liquidneon.com Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:10:22 -0000 On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:14:26AM +0000, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote: > Hi, > I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster with the > load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is > > ext_if="fxp0" > internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }" > rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> $internal_smtp_servers > round-robin sticky-address > > If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4 from > its table. Hi, I would use something line Nagios[1] or a perl script to do this. It is not in PFs realm to handle this sort of thing. [1]: http://www.nagios.org/ See the parts about Event handlers. Regards, Brad Davis From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 13:20:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D469416A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from tbwachiat.com (venus.tbwachiat.com [208.244.203.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAF543D1F; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from [10.20.4.87] steve_rieger [10.20.4.87] by tbwachiat.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.22.1.16 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Tue, 31 May 2005 09:20:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: steve Rieger Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:20:59 -0400 To: "Sunil Sunder Raj" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:20:54 -0000 On May 31, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote: > Hi, > I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster > with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is > > ext_if="fxp0" > internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }" > rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> > $internal_smtp_servers round-robin sticky-address > > If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4 > from its table. > > Regards > Sunil Sunder Raj > check out vrrp \-- Steve Rieger (212) 804-1131 (Work) (646) 335-8915 (Cell) chozrim (aim) From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 13:58:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDD016A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com) Received: from ender.liquidneon.com (ender.liquidneon.com [64.78.150.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2867043D4C; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8C5A6C31; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:58:50 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ender.liquidneon.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.liquidneon.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90512-07; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:58:50 -0600 (MDT) Received: by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F486A6C24; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:58:50 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:58:50 -0600 From: Brad Davis To: Daniel Gerzo Message-ID: <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com> References: <751754961.20050531150559@rulez.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <751754961.20050531150559@rulez.sk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ender.liquidneon.com Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:58:51 -0000 On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Hi Sunil, > > Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 1:14:26 PM, you Cannot open file "C\TXT COOKIES\reply-en.txt":: > > > Hi, > > I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster with the > > load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is > > > ext_if="fxp0" > > internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }" > > rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> $internal_smtp_servers > > round-robin sticky-address > > > If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4 from its > > table. > > people use CARP for this, don't they? No.. This is not what CARP does. CARP is for redundant firewalls/routers. Regards, Brad Davis From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 14:01:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F3016A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:01:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com) Received: from ender.liquidneon.com (ender.liquidneon.com [64.78.150.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88BE43D58; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:01:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91675A6C67; Tue, 31 May 2005 08:01:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ender.liquidneon.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.liquidneon.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90512-10; Tue, 31 May 2005 08:01:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: by ender.liquidneon.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 55975A6C5E; Tue, 31 May 2005 08:01:19 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:01:19 -0600 From: Brad Davis To: steve Rieger Message-ID: <20050531140119.GC90363@ender.liquidneon.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ender.liquidneon.com Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:01:20 -0000 On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:20:59AM -0400, steve Rieger wrote: > > On May 31, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote: > > >Hi, > >I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster > >with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is > > > >ext_if="fxp0" > >internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }" > >rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> > >$internal_smtp_servers round-robin sticky-address > > > >If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4 > >from its table. > > > >Regards > >Sunil Sunder Raj > > > > check out vrrp VRRP is for redundant routers. Regards, Brad Davis From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 14:07:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45CD16A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:07:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mclone@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212DF43D5E for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:07:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mclone@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b11so90629rne for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:07:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CVQ7EQTmoSVVH6CcGCCmtOOpWG7OVYL3pAUel79veynuJ9rvDd7OXwcTkXfxg/6CIuGoAWXWtxLPQIrvoFKYlifAKy/kQxUsGlwXiu5wS+UVCooPifpBPyMRslOo8ukGN6uHf/SMqHeq1rHqy6rALL5jpjVf+raGH6E7eJ/yfBU= Received: by 10.11.88.29 with SMTP id l29mr59771cwb; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.98.32 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <451cb301050531070737602bed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:07:55 +0300 From: McLone To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <751754961.20050531150559@rulez.sk> <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com> Cc: Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: McLone List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:07:57 -0000 On 5/31/05, Brad Davis wrote: > > people use CARP for this, don't they? > No.. This is not what CARP does. CARP is for redundant firewalls/routers. CARP is for sharing one IP between multiple hosts/NICs. pfsync is for edundant PFs. Do yourself a favor, RTFM some. http://openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#CARP http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html --=20 wbr, |\ _,,,---,,_ dog bless ya! ` Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ McLone at GMail dot com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' net- and *BSD admin '---''(_/--' `-'\_) ...sorry for translit From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 14:08:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D781916A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:08:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhartmei@insomnia.benzedrine.cx) Received: from insomnia.benzedrine.cx (insomnia.benzedrine.cx [62.65.145.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E38043D1D; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:08:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhartmei@insomnia.benzedrine.cx) Received: from insomnia.benzedrine.cx (dhartmei@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insomnia.benzedrine.cx (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4VE8SPX016661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 May 2005 16:08:28 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from dhartmei@localhost) by insomnia.benzedrine.cx (8.13.4/8.12.10/Submit) id j4VE8RBL021234; Tue, 31 May 2005 16:08:27 +0200 (MEST) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:08:27 +0200 From: Daniel Hartmeier To: Brad Davis Message-ID: <20050531140827.GF16010@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> References: <751754961.20050531150559@rulez.sk> <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: Daniel Gerzo , freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:08:30 -0000 On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:58:50AM -0600, Brad Davis wrote: > No.. This is not what CARP does. CARP is for redundant firewalls/routers. That's just one of it's uses. Take a look at http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/ and scroll down to the example about load balancing, then see carp(4) and search for arpbalance. You can automate the simpler (?) rdr balancing using a script that checks outage and removes/adds addresses to tables, if you prefer that, see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-pf&m=106883416904625&w=2 for an example. Daniel From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 14:53:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82FB16A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:53:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from tbwachiat.com (mercury.tbwachiat.com [204.17.229.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760B543D1F; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:53:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from [10.20.4.87] steve_rieger [10.20.4.87] by tbwachiat.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.22.1.16 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Tue, 31 May 2005 07:53:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050531140119.GC90363@ender.liquidneon.com> References: <20050531140119.GC90363@ender.liquidneon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <60bcc00e76e1ba18afc5e943135810a3@n2sw.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: steve Rieger Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:53:36 -0400 To: Brad Davis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:53:33 -0000 On May 31, 2005, at 10:01 AM, Brad Davis wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:20:59AM -0400, steve Rieger wrote: >> >> On May 31, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster >>> with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is >>> >>> ext_if="fxp0" >>> internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }" >>> rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> >>> $internal_smtp_servers round-robin sticky-address >>> >>> If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4 >>> from its table. >>> >>> Regards >>> Sunil Sunder Raj >>> >> >> check out vrrp > > VRRP is for redundant routers. > > > Regards, > Brad Davis > mr brad davis, whilst i am not here to yell at you. you have no idea what you are talking about. i work for one of the largest stock exchanges in the world and we use vrrp on 73 servers to server apache vrrp was invented by cisco and they use it on their load balancers but as somebody already said rtfm dude. From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 15:23:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACB716A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 15:23:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@fruitsalad.org) Received: from mandarin.fruitsalad.org (pc117.net160.koping.net [81.16.160.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A1B43D54; Tue, 31 May 2005 15:23:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@fruitsalad.org) Received: from [192.168.15.27] (helo=jeriksso.universe.hasta.se) by mandarin.fruitsalad.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dd8aD-0001y6-6r; Tue, 31 May 2005 17:23:09 +0200 From: Matt Douhan Organization: fruitsalad.org To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:20:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50 References: <20050531140119.GC90363@ender.liquidneon.com> <60bcc00e76e1ba18afc5e943135810a3@n2sw.com> In-Reply-To: <60bcc00e76e1ba18afc5e943135810a3@n2sw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505311720.09703.matt@fruitsalad.org> Cc: Brad Davis , freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:23:13 -0000 On Tuesday 31 May 2005 16.53, steve Rieger wrote: > whilst i am not here to yell at you. then why are you? > > you have no idea what you are talking about. And as shown below neither do you > > i work for one of the largest stock exchanges in the world and we use > vrrp on 73 servers to server apache and your point being? if we are going to make this a competion for who runs the largest server farms or the largest networks you will loose, since 73 servers is simply the front end to the systems we are running. > > > vrrp was invented by cisco and they use it on their load balancers but > as somebody already said rtfm dude. Dood I suggest YOU read up on this and then post back to the list who really invented VRRP. -- Matt Douhan www.fruitsalad.org kolab + toltec + horde + kontact == success From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 18:05:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freeBSD-Cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freeBSD-Cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3D016A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:05:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Clusters@mpecsinc.com) Received: from priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB3D43D49 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Clusters@mpecsinc.com) Received: from MPECSSTN01 ([142.179.185.119]) by priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050602180529.VKJJ1565.priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net@MPECSSTN01> for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:05:29 -0600 From: "Phil E." To: "FreeBSD Clustering List" Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:06:24 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcVnncgah426pmA/TV+bFUD6NEn2Rg== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Message-Id: <20050602180529.VKJJ1565.priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net@MPECSSTN01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Infrastructure Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:05:33 -0000 Hello all, I have done some research into the communication setup we will be using with our clusters, and so far the xStack series by D-Link seem to have the features that would work well for our budget. We want to stick with Gigabit (most of our nodes will be dual Gigabit load balanced) and as big an uplink setup between switches as possible. What type of switches do you recommend? Currently the fibre interconnect equipment such as Myricom or InfiniBand is out of our league, so we are sticking with CAT6 copper based networking for now, with a move to fibre or CAT7 in the later phases of our project. Any advise will be greatly appreciated! Pax, Philip Elder MPECS Inc.