From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 11:27:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA4516A4E7 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 11:27:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cegetel.net (mf00.sitadelle.com [212.94.174.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B9043D49 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 11:26:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jspedron@club-internet.fr) Received: from [172.16.142.1] (213-223-184-193.dti.cegetel.net [213.223.184.193]) by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256D11A5997 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 13:26:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 13:27:24 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20050208 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr, en-us, en, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3DCE5DA0B36C446990E0D2DD" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Call for feedback about ReiserFS import X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 11:27:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3DCE5DA0B36C446990E0D2DD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi everyone, The current port of ReiserFS is ready to be imported in the tree for a few months, however my mentor mux@ and I have concerns about the organization of the sources of this version. Originally, the port is based on Linux 2.6.7. My goal was to distribute it as a 3rd party package, maybe a port. Because I was interested in kernel development and how ReiserFS was working, I started from scratch, bringing the necessary pieces of code from Linux little by little, to achieve read-only support. The main issue with this approach is maintainability: the filenames and source layout is different between the original Linux version and the port. Changes in the Linux tree are harder to track. I'd like to import this version in FreeBSD's tree, because: - ReiserFS' homepage (http://www.namesys.com/) says it shouldn't evolve anymore (just rare bugfixes). For instance, between Linux 2.6.7 and 2.6.11.3, they added a few checks of functions' return code. - with my approach, I have a better knowledge of the filesystem internals. If we want a BSD licensed version, it should be easier. - work is more interesting this way than just make the Linux version compile. - it's already done ;) But I know that the tradition is to import external code with changes as less intrusive as possible, for good reason. Does anyone has objections for this? -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron http://www.dumbbell.fr/ PGP Key: http://www.dumbbell.fr/pgp/pubkey.asc --------------enig3DCE5DA0B36C446990E0D2DD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCf0kca+xGJsFYOlMRAhzhAJ49qPcgbBmrczL479WTLoO2WIu2dQCfQbov UcXQ2JcvUArvmaEeYRoPEwc= =mEhC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3DCE5DA0B36C446990E0D2DD-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 15:44:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9231316A4E8 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 15:44:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158DA43D75 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 15:44:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916B9856AE; Tue, 10 May 2005 01:14:49 +0930 (CST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id AFCDF4D2FF; Mon, 9 May 2005 10:43:38 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 10:43:38 -0500 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Jean-Sebastien Pedron Message-ID: <20050509154338.GD1592@eucla.lemis.com> References: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback about ReiserFS import X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 15:44:55 -0000 On Monday, 9 May 2005 at 13:27:24 +0200, Jean-Sbastien Pdron wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The current port of ReiserFS is ready to be imported in the tree for a > few months, however my mentor mux@ and I have concerns about the > organization of the sources of this version. > > Originally, the port is based on Linux 2.6.7. My goal was to distribute > it as a 3rd party package, maybe a port. Because I was interested in > kernel development and how ReiserFS was working, I started from scratch, > bringing the necessary pieces of code from Linux little by little, to > achieve read-only support. > > The main issue with this approach is maintainability: the filenames and > source layout is different between the original Linux version and the > port. Changes in the Linux tree are harder to track. > > I'd like to import this version in FreeBSD's tree, because: > - ReiserFS' homepage (http://www.namesys.com/) says it shouldn't evolve > anymore (just rare bugfixes). For instance, between Linux 2.6.7 and > 2.6.11.3, they added a few checks of functions' return code. > - with my approach, I have a better knowledge of the filesystem > internals. If we want a BSD licensed version, it should be easier. > - work is more interesting this way than just make the Linux version > compile. This may be true, but it isn't really relevant to what goes into the tree. > - it's already done ;) Well, as far as it goes. I wouldn't say it's done until you have the complete functionality. > But I know that the tradition is to import external code with changes as > less intrusive as possible, for good reason. Does anyone has objections > for this? I don't know if "objection" is the right word, but it seems to be a sub-optimal approach. Also, there's a real danger that the full functionality might never be achieved. On the other hand, it's better than nothing, and since there's also a real danger that nobody will do a full version anyway, I'm not going to take a position. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 16:48:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5B016A4F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 16:48:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB0343DA2 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 16:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.21] (rat.samsco.home [192.168.254.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j49Gqp33029240; Mon, 9 May 2005 10:52:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <427F9404.8060509@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 10:47:00 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050321 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= References: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> In-Reply-To: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback about ReiserFS import X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 16:48:02 -0000 Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The current port of ReiserFS is ready to be imported in the tree for a > few months, however my mentor mux@ and I have concerns about the > organization of the sources of this version. > > Originally, the port is based on Linux 2.6.7. My goal was to distribute > it as a 3rd party package, maybe a port. Because I was interested in > kernel development and how ReiserFS was working, I started from scratch, > bringing the necessary pieces of code from Linux little by little, to > achieve read-only support. > > The main issue with this approach is maintainability: the filenames and > source layout is different between the original Linux version and the > port. Changes in the Linux tree are harder to track. > > I'd like to import this version in FreeBSD's tree, because: > - ReiserFS' homepage (http://www.namesys.com/) says it shouldn't evolve > anymore (just rare bugfixes). For instance, between Linux 2.6.7 and > 2.6.11.3, they added a few checks of functions' return code. > - with my approach, I have a better knowledge of the filesystem > internals. If we want a BSD licensed version, it should be easier. > - work is more interesting this way than just make the Linux version > compile. > - it's already done ;) > > But I know that the tradition is to import external code with changes as > less intrusive as possible, for good reason. Does anyone has objections > for this? > > -- I'll agree with Greg that it's not optimal. Life changes, and in a few years you might move on and no longer be interested in ReiserFS. That will make it very hard to stay in sync over the long term. However, if this is to be the basis for doing a GPL-free version of ReiserFS, then there is nothing wrong with changing the layout. I guess it all comes down to what your long-term plans and committments are. If what you have now is what you are comfortable with and you have plans to continue to maintain and improve it, then by all means import it. Scott From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 21:13:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA2516A4D0 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 21:13:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eql145.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (eql145.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.20.79.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 428B143D91 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 21:13:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from blushed@uch.ch) Received: from [150.238.226.237] (port=2332 helo=[clocking]) by eql145.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl with esmtp id 78858100831fortier90856 for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 23:05:46 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v728) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3357765465.67146@eql145.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: Reynold Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 23:05:45 +0300 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.728) Subject: Penis enhancement patch, doctor approved and recommended. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:13:31 -0000 Finally a Patch that works! http://www.vodoro.info/ss/ Hey - Don't get ripped off! From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 11 04:05:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A6116A4CE for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 04:05:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu (bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu [128.226.1.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BCF43D78 for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 04:05:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zzhang@cs.binghamton.edu) Received: from opal (opal.cs.binghamton.edu [128.226.123.101]) j4B45uND012490; Wed, 11 May 2005 00:05:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 00:05:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Zhihui Zhang X-Sender: zzhang@opal To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= In-Reply-To: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback about ReiserFS import X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 04:05:58 -0000 Hmm. Reiser4 is already released and is better than ReiserFS... On Mon, 9 May 2005, [UTF-8] Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron wrote: > Hi everyone, >=20 > The current port of ReiserFS is ready to be imported in the tree for a > few months, however my mentor mux@ and I have concerns about the > organization of the sources of this version. >=20 > Originally, the port is based on Linux 2.6.7. My goal was to distribute > it as a 3rd party package, maybe a port. Because I was interested in > kernel development and how ReiserFS was working, I started from scratch, > bringing the necessary pieces of code from Linux little by little, to > achieve read-only support. >=20 > The main issue with this approach is maintainability: the filenames and > source layout is different between the original Linux version and the > port. Changes in the Linux tree are harder to track. >=20 > I'd like to import this version in FreeBSD's tree, because: > - ReiserFS' homepage (http://www.namesys.com/) says it shouldn't evolve > anymore (just rare bugfixes). For instance, between Linux 2.6.7 and > 2.6.11.3, they added a few checks of functions' return code. > - with my approach, I have a better knowledge of the filesystem > internals. If we want a BSD licensed version, it should be easier. > - work is more interesting this way than just make the Linux version > compile. > - it's already done ;) >=20 > But I know that the tradition is to import external code with changes as > less intrusive as possible, for good reason. Does anyone has objections > for this? >=20 > -- > Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron > http://www.dumbbell.fr/ >=20 > PGP Key: http://www.dumbbell.fr/pgp/pubkey.asc >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 11 11:03:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7507116A4CE for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:03:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F24343D5C for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:03:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920) id E290D5C9F5; Wed, 11 May 2005 04:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:03:44 +0200 From: Maxime Henrion To: Zhihui Zhang Message-ID: <20050511110344.GA5631@elvis.mu.org> References: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback about ReiserFS import X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:03:45 -0000 Zhihui Zhang wrote: > Hmm. Reiser4 is already released and is better than ReiserFS... So you're volunteering to port or reimplement the Reiser4 code for FreeBSD? Thanks! Maxime From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 12 12:17:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B7A16A4CE for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:17:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cegetel.net (mf01.sitadelle.com [212.94.174.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E824643D46 for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:17:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jspedron@club-internet.fr) Received: from [172.16.142.1] (213-223-184-201.dti.cegetel.net [213.223.184.201]) by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2458318243; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:17:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42834982.40302@club-internet.fr> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:18:10 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20050208 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr, en-us, en, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> <427F9404.8060509@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <427F9404.8060509@samsco.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAF67AFC91C96BA501AF1EEDC" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback about ReiserFS import X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:17:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAF67AFC91C96BA501AF1EEDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Scott Long wrote: > Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> The current port of ReiserFS is ready to be imported in the tree for a >> few months, however my mentor mux@ and I have concerns about the >> organization of the sources of this version. >> >> Originally, the port is based on Linux 2.6.7. My goal was to distribute >> it as a 3rd party package, maybe a port. Because I was interested in >> kernel development and how ReiserFS was working, I started from scratch, >> bringing the necessary pieces of code from Linux little by little, to >> achieve read-only support. >> >> The main issue with this approach is maintainability: the filenames and >> source layout is different between the original Linux version and the >> port. Changes in the Linux tree are harder to track. >> >> I'd like to import this version in FreeBSD's tree, because: >> - ReiserFS' homepage (http://www.namesys.com/) says it shouldn't evolve >> anymore (just rare bugfixes). For instance, between Linux 2.6.7 and >> 2.6.11.3, they added a few checks of functions' return code. >> - with my approach, I have a better knowledge of the filesystem >> internals. If we want a BSD licensed version, it should be easier. >> - work is more interesting this way than just make the Linux version >> compile. >> - it's already done ;) >> >> But I know that the tradition is to import external code with changes as >> less intrusive as possible, for good reason. Does anyone has objections >> for this? > > I'll agree with Greg that it's not optimal. Life changes, and in a few > years you might move on and no longer be interested in ReiserFS. That > will make it very hard to stay in sync over the long term. However, if > this is to be the basis for doing a GPL-free version of ReiserFS, then > there is nothing wrong with changing the layout. I guess it all comes > down to what your long-term plans and committments are. If what you > have now is what you are comfortable with and you have plans to continue > to maintain and improve it, then by all means import it. Thanks a lot for your answers, Greg & Scott. My main argument was that the current Linux version for ReiserFS isn't likely to evolve. Thus, stay in sync with it should be easier. I also started to document the on-disk structure, I may continue with the code. I understand that the write support will be a difficult challenge, but I'm willing to add it. And as you said Scott, I'm more comfortable with the current port. I'm going to send the last patch to mux for review and commit it. Thanks again! -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron http://www.dumbbell.fr/ PGP Key: http://www.dumbbell.fr/pgp/pubkey.asc --------------enigAF67AFC91C96BA501AF1EEDC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCg0mKa+xGJsFYOlMRAg1IAJ0cQ4kbT40V9k4hQg7yDrKInL7IrQCgglVT L3dm7TWOQQdR6SxOGVeX6Z8= =SqrL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAF67AFC91C96BA501AF1EEDC-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 12 12:33:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F032C16A4CE for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:33:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ds9.atempo.com (ds9.atempo.com [212.157.146.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E8D43D82 for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:33:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from herve.kergourlay@atempo.com) Received: from ds9.atempo.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.atempo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B672FD09 for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atempo.com (unknown [172.16.15.140])by ds9.atempo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FB82FD06for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (aragorn.vannes.quadratec.fr [192.168.2.108])by atempo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502471E331Dfor ; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42834CF9.6060301@atempo.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:32:57 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIEtlcmdvdXJsYXk=?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> <427F9404.8060509@samsco.org> <42834982.40302@club-internet.fr> In-Reply-To: <42834982.40302@club-internet.fr> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=------------080107020804080008040900 X-imss-version: 2.025 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-approveListMatch: *@atempo.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: setfacl -d X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:33:04 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080107020804080008040900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit how to set a default ACl on directory on FreeBSD 5.3 the setfacl -d failed with the following message any idea ?? fiobsd.hky(289) [dev->acl] ll total 10 drwxr-xr-x+ 2 hky wheel 512 May 12 13:41 dir1/ -rw-r-xr--+ 1 hky wheel 0 May 10 15:49 file1* -rwxr-xr-x+ 1 hky wheel 0 May 12 13:46 file2* lrwxr-xr-x 1 hky wheel 5 May 12 13:42 link2@ -> file2 drwxrwxrwx 2 hky wheel 512 May 11 14:44 rst/ fiobsd.hky(290) [dev->acl] setfacl -d -m u::rw- dir1 setfacl: acl_calc_mask() failed: Invalid argument setfacl: failed to set ACL mask on dir1 fiobsd.hky(291) [dev->acl] getfacl -d dir1/ #file:dir1/ #owner:114 #group:0 hervé --------------080107020804080008040900-- From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 13 01:51:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ED116A4CE for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 01:51:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B18F43D76 for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 01:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EFE46B06; Thu, 12 May 2005 21:51:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 02:56:28 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIEtlcmdvdXJsYXk=?= In-Reply-To: <42834CF9.6060301@atempo.com> Message-ID: <20050513025346.G96703@fledge.watson.org> References: <427F491C.4090501@club-internet.fr> <427F9404.8060509@samsco.org> <42834982.40302@club-internet.fr> <42834CF9.6060301@atempo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1727501279-1115949388=:96703" cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setfacl -d X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 01:51:49 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1727501279-1115949388=:96703 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Thu, 12 May 2005, [UTF-8] Herv=E9 Kergourlay wrote: > how to set a default ACl on directory on FreeBSD 5.3 > > the setfacl -d failed with the following message > > any idea ?? Is the ACL flag enabled on the file system? We don't enable ACLs by=20 default. mount(8) should show the 'acls' flag if it's enabled. Robert N M Watson --0-1727501279-1115949388=:96703--