From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 00:09:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820DA16A427 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5AAB43D5C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:09:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 24733 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2005 00:09:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:thread-index; b=z5LNK+ct0KgDFatPwdvoQ0t3zk7B4k5bvN/L847szYntAm3PYs8ig81pDtOOVHWuSWnwGvqtRbi5i6kGq0RRVHH+FMx8h98kcBRK7H0ympnzorWzuRgkNd4S60OVp4XcarkWv+DezSRlxJEoCqX3YS5h1W40jM8b9LVWnA2Cf8M= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2005 00:09:29 -0000 From: "Tamouh H." To: Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:09:25 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcYDX1r9t9BKPJzyTVaOcX7qkNZGhAAB8/EA Message-Id: <20051218000929.C5AAB43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: Device needed to manage several FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:09:30 -0000 > I have a bunch of FreeBSD servers to manage, and I'm wanting > to find a device that lets you SSH/telnet in, and access the > servers connected to it via serial cables. I know such a > device exists, but it was a long time ago since I last saw > one, and I'm not really sure what one of these would be > called. Has anyone had any experience with such a device? It is called Remote Serial Console or Remote SSH Console. Something like: http://www.networktechinc.com/srvsw-term-ssh.html You might also want to look KVM over IP switches From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 00:11:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D9216A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:11:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhanson@securityfocus.com) Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com (outgoing.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A899343D5C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:11:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhanson@securityfocus.com) Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com by outgoing.securityfocus.com via smtpd (for mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:48:00 -0800 Received: from mail.securityfocus.com (mail.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.9]) by outgoing3.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 35E0423BEF4 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:34:43 -0700 (MST) Received: (qmail 9084 invoked by uid 1061); 18 Dec 2005 00:04:03 -0000 Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:04:03 -0700 From: Daniel Hanson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051218000403.GB7506@securityfocus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: FreeBSD 6, WPA-PSK, wpa_supplicant and a IBM a31p X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:11:15 -0000 Ok, I've exhausted a FreeBSD phanatic friend of mine, and spent quite a while trying different configurations to get this working, and am coming up against a brick wall. I am attempting to setup a Thinkpad a31p with a built in wireless card, it uses the wi driver. The output of dmesg =-=- wi0: mem 0xf8000000-0xf8000fff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci2 wi0: using RF:PRISM2.5 MAC:ISL3874A(Mini-PCI) wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary (1.0.7), Station (1.3.6) wi0: Ethernet address: 00:20:e0:8c:ea:87 =-=- It will happily chatter unencrypted, but, well, I would rather have wpa-psk on my home setup. so, after following the various man pages, handbook pages, and some webpages I am currently doing the following. Boot kldload wlan_wep wlan_acl wlan_ccmp wlan_tkip ( Ihave also loaded wlan_xauth under some config attempts although nothign I have read indicates this is required) /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf contains =-=-=- ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant ctrl_interface_group=wheel eapol_version=1 ap_scan=1 ####I have tried ap_scan=2 more details below fast_reauth=1 network={ ssid="my_ssid" key_mgmt=WPA-PSK psk="my_passphrase" } =-=-=- When I start wpa_supplicant, it seems to find the SSID, and then nothign... no errors, no nothing, I have the debug enabled output of the wpa_supplicant -dd command that I can include as a text file, but it is a little long (due to teh ping and commands issued from wpa_cli). At one point, I tried changing ap_scan=1 to ap_scan=2, as someone had posted they had done. I saw immediate (well once I reinitiated teh wpa_supplicant command) results. All of a sudden, it found, and as best as I can tell, tried to negotiate. but threw out the following error. =-=-=- wpa_driver_bsd_associate: ssid 'myssid' wpa ie len 22 pairwise 3 group 3 key mgmt 1 wpa_driver_bsd_associate: ioctl[SIOCS80211, op 21 len 42] invalid request association request to the driver failed =-=-=- The AP uses WPA-PSK(TKIP), I have tried it with the network directive including proto as WPA and WPA2, key_mgmt as TKIP, pairwise as TKIP, and probably a few other things I am currently forgeting. Thoughts, ideas? directions. From my reading of the man pages, ap_scan should only ever be 1, and the others are used for other OS's, which might explain the error that I am receiving when it's set to 2. I am at a dead end of where I can look to further investigate. D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 00:16:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB3C16A420 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:16:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2662043D8C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:16:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9EAD2473B for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:15:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:15:53 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 74vLxTVpUR28nQ7WLnLCqxrGbxDfIDdpKjsYgBQA3CYN 1134864952 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-199-37.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.199.37]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF21957146A for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:15:51 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:15:49 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512180015.50574.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Device needed to manage several FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:16:15 -0000 On Saturday 17 December 2005 23:11, patrick wrote: > I have a bunch of FreeBSD servers to manage, and I'm wanting to find a > device that lets you SSH/telnet in, and access the servers connected > to it via serial cables. I know such a device exists, but it was a > long time ago since I last saw one, and I'm not really sure what one > of these would be called. Has anyone had any experience with such a > device? I've heard them called Terminal Servers, but that name is also used in the sense of Windows Terminal Server. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 00:36:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DD516A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:36:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpessa@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BF343D7E for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:35:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpessa@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so898728wra for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:35:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=QUY2B6cdgHH0m4NfNYTRnx1DbRqKMSvTBy8VVyu5DUBYO/FMkKHwd6lSiTcKP/HrnoVcAVAmExrRmWvjpPThmO1GpN8WLzrT/942QoCIWl9aGSA5NzIikRPzybpIA4sK3NcqPI15AJl5+4qBg7moahUUJx90FzCFSGYmjLrnsmA= Received: by 10.65.157.6 with SMTP id j6mr1275553qbo; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:35:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.251.18 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:35:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <906c85330512171635h11af4f30q6567f7eff29d5bef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:35:52 -0500 From: Justin Pessa To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Problems rebuilding world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:36:02 -0000 I'm rebuilding world to upgrade from 5.4 to 6.0 on my laptop. The original build worked find then crapped out when running install world with an error saying that /usr/share/locale/uk_UA.CP1251/LC_COLLATE could not be found. So now I can't load any additional applications because almost everything segfaults. I removed my /usr/src directory and cvsup'd everything fresh. I can build my 6.0 kernel without problem but I get the following make error when building world: =3D=3D=3D> share/termcap (all) gzip -cn /usr/src/share/termcap/termcap.5 > termcap.5.gz TERM=3Ddumb TERMCAP=3Ddumb: ex - /usr/src/share/termcap/termcap.src < /usr/src/share/termcap/reorder cap_mkdb -l termcap cap_mkdb: illegal option -- l usage: cap_mkdb [-v] [-f outfile] file [file ...] I know this is related to my original the borked partial installworld. I'm stumped as to what I should try from here. Any thoughts? Please CC me on your response. Thanks a lot! Best, -- - justin "Whatever I feel like I wanna do. Gosh!" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 01:02:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E771616A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:02:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: from mail.cruzinternet.com (mail.cruzinternet.com [216.234.167.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A21343D4C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:02:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: (qmail 65309 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2005 18:02:20 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (216.234.174.10) by mail.cruzinternet.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2005 18:02:20 -0700 Message-ID: <43A4B59A.8030407@cruzinternet.com> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:04:26 -0700 From: Jeff Molofee User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051217) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051218003625.24D1716A426@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20051218003625.24D1716A426@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 117, Issue 23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:02:22 -0000 Having some serious problems with gnome-theme-manager. Up until last week it was running great. I installed a few icon packs, themes, etc, no problems. 2 days ago I went to install a new theme and notice the the theme manager took a long time to come up, and when it did, none of the themes looked like themes. They were all greyed out with a question mark in the middle. Clicking theme details opened a theme window with nothing in it (partially drawn). I did some quick reading and found that the transparency in X can cause problems. So I disabled it. Rebooted and noted the same problems. I then removed all my themes and reinstalled them, thinking perhaps one was corrupt and it was messing up the rest. Same problem. Yesterday early in the morning I decided to reinstall everything from scratch (drastic, but wanted to be sure it wasn't my set up). Gnome is back up, but theme manager is still screwed up. If I select certain themes not only do they not work, but my machine has a tendancy to crash. Gnome crashes, and I'm back to the login prompt. Is anyone aware of a problem with the gnome-theme-manager or am I the only one having this problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 01:16:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC4C16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:16:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk (heisenberg.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7571343D58 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from [82.71.1.109] (helo=[10.0.1.166]) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EnnAU-0005Tq-4x; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:16:54 +0000 Message-ID: <43A4B87F.60708@thingy.apana.org.au> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:16:47 +0000 From: David Gerard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200512180015.50574.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <200512180015.50574.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.71.1.109] Cc: Subject: Re: Device needed to manage several FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:16:57 -0000 RW wrote: > On Saturday 17 December 2005 23:11, patrick wrote: >>I have a bunch of FreeBSD servers to manage, and I'm wanting to find a >>device that lets you SSH/telnet in, and access the servers connected >>to it via serial cables. I know such a device exists, but it was a >>long time ago since I last saw one, and I'm not really sure what one >>of these would be called. Has anyone had any experience with such a >>device? > I've heard them called Terminal Servers, but that name is also used in the > sense of Windows Terminal Server. "Console server", specifically "remote serial console servers." You can make one yourself with a PC and a bunch of serial cards very easily (using conserver(8)) - or (a better idea in a commercial setting) buy them as a supported piece of hardware. It doesn't matter for FreeBSD on a PC, but if you're running Suns then important matters include not sending BREAKs down the line at inopportune moments. I asked about this on my LiveJournal and got quite informative responses: http://www.livejournal.com/users/reddragdiva/241324.html - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 01:27:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BBA16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:27:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.clarke@brunel.ac.uk) Received: from astro.systems.pipex.net (astro.systems.pipex.net [62.241.163.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7E043D58 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:27:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.clarke@brunel.ac.uk) Received: from brunel.ac.uk (81-178-64-169.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.64.169]) by astro.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879F8E000098 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:27:49 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <43A4BACE.473D6FE5@brunel.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:26:38 +0000 From: Malcolm Clarke X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: IPFW pipe command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:27:52 -0000 I have a question regarding use of the "pipe" command in IPFW. I use the following commands #ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to any #ipfw pipe 1 config but get the following error ipfw: setsockopt(IP_DUMMYNET_CONFIGURE): Protocol not available I have added firewall_enable="YES" in rc.conf Is there a setting I need to set or change Regards Malcolm -- --------------------------------------------------- Dr Malcolm Clarke Senior Lecturer in Data Communication Systems and Telemedicine Department of Information Systems and Computing Brunel University Uxbridge Middlesex UB8 3PH UK Tel: +44 1895 265053 Fax: +44 1895 251686 ---------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 01:38:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E691E16A420 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:38:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C07E43D5C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:38:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 37744 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2005 01:38:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (calartstech@sbcglobal.net@68.127.38.82 with plain) by smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2005 01:38:27 -0000 Message-ID: <43A4BD8E.4060707@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:38:22 -0800 From: Jose Borquez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions group Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Question about PHP5 vs mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:38:29 -0000 I am currently running FreeBSD 5.4 with Apache+mod_ssl 1.3.34 and I am attempting to configure group office which is a project management suite. I need php support and I am confused about what the difference is between PHP5 and mod_php5. If I just install mod_php5 will that be enough to allow php support? Thanks in advance, Jose From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 02:10:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809A716A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willmaier@ml1.net) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BB243D66 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:10:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willmaier@ml1.net) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3434D248D5 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:10:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:10:46 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: +GuGNHufQ0OlXSGL0sGtNW3UvJ8dAWfO6wS3HrqJtW0u 1134871845 Received: from localhost (mdsnwikwbas08-pool4-a199.mdsnwikw.tds.net [69.129.195.199]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3317757146D for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:10:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:12:02 -0600 From: Will Maier To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051218021202.GC21903@merkur.atekomi.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: Device needed to manage several FreeBSD servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:10:55 -0000 On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:11:24PM -0800, patrick wrote: > I have a bunch of FreeBSD servers to manage, and I'm wanting to > find a device that lets you SSH/telnet in, and access the servers > connected to it via serial cables. I know such a device exists, > but it was a long time ago since I last saw one, and I'm not > really sure what one of these would be called. Has anyone had any > experience with such a device? Other responses in the thread are correct -- you're looking for a console server (or a serial concentrator). There's an article shipped with FreeBSD that describes just this type of thing; it's also available online: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/console-server/index.html -- o--------------------------{ Will Maier }--------------------------o | jabber:..wcmaier@jabber.ccc.de | email:..........wcmaier@ml1.net | | \.........wcmaier@cae.wisc.edu | \..........wcmaier@cae.wisc.edu | *------------------[ BSD Unix: Live Free or Die ]------------------* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 02:32:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEC216A41F; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:32:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-04-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D083B43D55; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-185-179-246.woh.res.rr.com [65.185.179.246]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id jBI2WqHH006601; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:32:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000301c6037a$37f0cfe0$0402a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:24:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: wired and wireless network setup interactions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:32:56 -0000 Hello, I have a setup that was a 10 megabit hub holding together a freebsd6 firewall/router/webserver/other box. Updated that to a 10/100 megabitt Belkin g+ router for wireless. The problem now that i'm having is both the server and this new router do the following: firewall dhcp dns nat and they both utilize separate subnets. I'd like for the Belkin router to handle wireless traffic, while the original fbsd router handles wired as well as it's original functions of firewall, nat, dns, and dhcp. If anyone has any experience with this or recommendations i'd appreciate it. My thought was turn off the dhcp server on the belkin router and let the original fbsd server's dhcp server handle it, but i'm not sure if doing so will disable it's ability to accept wireless clients. I'd also like the wireless network to be secure. Some urgency! Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 02:59:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3C816A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:59:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@ircnow.org) Received: from scott.blazing.de (scott.blazing.de [80.86.187.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6CB43D53 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:59:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@ircnow.org) Received: by scott.blazing.de (Postfix, from userid 510) id 4F61F82404; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:59:19 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on scott.blazing.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by scott.blazing.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF59282402; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:59:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 frank@ircnow.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:59:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:59:17 +0100 From: Frank Steinborn To: Justin Pessa Message-ID: <20051218025917.GA26250@scott.blazing.de> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Pessa , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <906c85330512171635h11af4f30q6567f7eff29d5bef@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <906c85330512171635h11af4f30q6567f7eff29d5bef@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP: 41F1741D User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r581 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems rebuilding world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:59:21 -0000 --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Justin Pessa wrote: > =3D=3D=3D> share/termcap (all) > gzip -cn /usr/src/share/termcap/termcap.5 > termcap.5.gz > TERM=3Ddumb TERMCAP=3Ddumb: ex - /usr/src/share/termcap/termcap.src < > /usr/src/share/termcap/reorder > cap_mkdb -l termcap > cap_mkdb: illegal option -- l > usage: cap_mkdb [-v] [-f outfile] file [file ...] >=20 > I know this is related to my original the borked partial installworld. > I'm stumped as to what I should try from here. Any thoughts? Go to /usr/src/usr.bin/cap_mkdb/ and do make and make install, then try again. Frank --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDpNCEK0akcUHxdB0RApZnAJ9++u/61aEe8NidXzwbMtuPiqQcdwCgzNmL EMODyicRfbawc0APlPBprAI= =WQSf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 03:13:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9243116A41F; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: from pit.databus.com (p72-0-224-2.acedsl.com [72.0.224.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DAD43D5F; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: from pit.databus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pit.databus.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBI3DrTr040450; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:13:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by pit.databus.com (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id jBI3DrwC040449; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:13:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from barney) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:13:53 -0500 From: Barney Wolff To: Dave Message-ID: <20051218031353.GA37356@pit.databus.com> References: <000301c6037a$37f0cfe0$0402a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000301c6037a$37f0cfe0$0402a8c0@satellite> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wired and wireless network setup interactions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:13:56 -0000 On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:24:47PM -0500, Dave wrote: > I have a setup that was a 10 megabit hub holding together a freebsd6 > firewall/router/webserver/other box. Updated that to a 10/100 megabitt > Belkin g+ router for wireless. The problem now that i'm having is both the > server and this new router do the following: > firewall > dhcp > dns > nat > and they both utilize separate subnets. I'd like for the Belkin router to > handle wireless traffic, while the original fbsd router handles wired as > well as it's original functions of firewall, nat, dns, and dhcp. > If anyone has any experience with this or recommendations i'd appreciate > it. My thought was turn off the dhcp server on the belkin router and let > the original fbsd server's dhcp server handle it, but i'm not sure if doing > so will disable it's ability to accept wireless clients. I'd also like the > wireless network to be secure. Use the Belkin as a bridge rather than a router, by simply not using its WAN port, and do turn off its dhcp server. I do the same with a Netgear. -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I never met a computer I didn't like. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 04:00:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D1016A423 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:00:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EA943D55 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:00:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jBI40Q38009116; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:00:26 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jBI40PBk009115; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:00:25 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200512180400.jBI40PBk009115@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: mlandman@face2interface.com (Marty Landman) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:00:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20051216214326.03bf2c18@face2interface.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marty Landman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to dual boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:00:34 -0000 > > At 07:39 PM 12/16/2005, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > >You need to read the documentation better. > > Or at all. :) Was hoping it would just magically guide me through it. Not > a critical box of mine of course. > > >It tells you that you should install Microsloth first and then FreeBSD. > > Did that, lost MS so reinstalled it. > > >But, FreeBSD is more sophisticated and also more friendly to the rest > >of the world and, first of all, asks if you want an MBR installed in > >the sector 0 and then if you go ahead and write FreeBSD's MBR, it will > >give you a choice of bootable slices to boot, including MS if present. > > Ok, I'll read the docs and reinstall FBSD. That's no problem, I hope. > > Here is the problem. This is my kids' computer and they insist on > installing XP. So we keep doing 30 day trials. On the bright side they've > all learned to install the OS. Sounds like I'll have problems though > keeping a FreeBSD install on there if Windows has to be reinstalled every > 30 days. Oh well, such is life in the fast lane. Have fun. ////jerry > Yuck. > > Marty > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 04:14:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A4316A422 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:14:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from notebook@tdf.com.br) Received: from ns1.tdf.com.br (ns1.tdf.com.br [200.223.219.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B99543D5C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:14:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from notebook@tdf.com.br) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by injector.tdf.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B456211D48C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:14:37 -0300 (BRT) Received: by ns1.tdf.com.br (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 1DA1211D42C; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:14:35 -0300 (BRT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.tdf.com.br X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 Received: from [172.22.0.98] (220011.tdf.com.br [200.223.220.11]) by ns1.tdf.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99C511D42C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:14:34 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <43A4E20F.2050207@tdf.com.br> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:14:07 -0300 From: Gustavo Parrini User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: AntiVirus - TDF Provider Subject: How to make init(8) run a daemon to me?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:14:14 -0000 Hi All, I'm having a pretty hard time trying to figure out how can I get init(8) to run a daemon and respawn it if it crashes. By the time I was a Linux user, it was done by adding a line in /etc/inittab and it was all... I know that it must be done in /etc/ttys but I couldn't find any syntax example after searching the FreeBSD manpages, maillists, Handbook and Google. "man init" gives me this: ... The *init* utility can also be used to keep arbitrary daemons running, automatically restarting them if they die. In this case, the first field in the ttys(5) file must not reference the path to a configured device node and will be passed to the daemon as the final argument on its com- mand line. This is similar to the facility offered in the AT&T System V UNIX //etc/inittab/. ... Sounded a little cryptic to me... sorry... Can anyone help me? If so, An example line would be fine. Thanx !! =) Gustavo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 04:43:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0C016A422 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:43:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3F243D53 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:43:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id jBI4gtqx008256; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:42:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:42:55 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Malcolm Clarke Message-ID: <20051218044255.GH89708@dan.emsphone.com> References: <43A4BACE.473D6FE5@brunel.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43A4BACE.473D6FE5@brunel.ac.uk> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW pipe command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 04:43:01 -0000 In the last episode (Dec 18), Malcolm Clarke said: > I have a question regarding use of the "pipe" command in IPFW. I use > the following commands > > #ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to any > #ipfw pipe 1 config > > but get the following error > > ipfw: setsockopt(IP_DUMMYNET_CONFIGURE): Protocol not available > > I have added firewall_enable="YES" in rc.conf > > Is there a setting I need to set or change Ipfw pipes and queues are part of the dummynet traffic shaper. You will need to rebuild your kernel with "options DUMMYNET". -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 05:06:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E6016A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 05:06:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrl0lz@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C03343D60 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 05:06:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrl0lz@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j2so912431nzf for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:06:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=h1nzTi7fXbB7vGmghI6ODYW0Dh6hJTfi7lXhtk4Jh7OPSlBdGl5SIYLRrc/j0iStwh2XKZhs75p/vcVIr69f3KNtCSktQAb2tc4s/lHrqsR85Co3CN2jFghNAOkyaNzPC8kcAgWyUjNK4Uorv0KOp56B3xX5cc/Pw0JzJDc8I7g= Received: by 10.65.186.7 with SMTP id n7mr3675441qbp; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:06:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?172.16.0.3? ( [71.80.228.80]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e19sm1619466qbe.2005.12.17.21.06.34; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:06:35 -0800 (PST) To: raz5@012.net.il In-Reply-To: <000c01c5fb5e$907ce910$0101c80a@r1> References: <000c01c5fb5e$907ce910$0101c80a@r1> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:06:46 -0800 Message-Id: <1134882408.798.0.camel@vaio> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Remington Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X error: [drm] failed to load kernel module "i915" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 05:06:37 -0000 On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 20:46 +0200, raz5@012.net.il wrote: > Hello > > I have problem with running X. I have tried to run it on FreeBSD 6.0 with LG 1730s and intel integrated card 82865G. > after I had read previous posts I have tried to change the Xorg.conf.new and test it but I still getting the errors: > > [drm] failed to load kernel module "i915" > (EE) I810(0): [DRI] DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI. > FreeFontPath: FPE "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Fonts/misc/" refcount is 2, should be 1:, fixing > > also I have seen this warning on the log file: > (WW) I810(0): Bad V_BIOS checksum > > Does anyone know how to solve it? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" You need to update your xorg driver. Let me know if you need it From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 06:05:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B91616A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:05:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A2043D55 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:05:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBI6536s067443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:05:03 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jBI652Vj020707; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:05:02 +0700 (ICT) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:05:02 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200512180605.jBI652Vj020707@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: dmehler26@woh.rr.com In-reply-to: <001801c60329$7ce12470$6409a8c0@satellite> (dmehler26@woh.rr.com) References: <001801c60329$7ce12470$6409a8c0@satellite> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: webmail solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:05:12 -0000 > I'm looking for experiences with a webmail solution. I want to use > postfix as my mta and on a freebsd6 machine. The users who will be using the > server probably would do better with a webmail package so they can get to it > from anywhere. The box already has apache and php so i don't think that'll > be an issue. One thing i'm uncertain is whether to offer direct pop/imap or > their equivalent encrypted counterparts or just do it all through webmail. I am using imp from the ports. It need some pop/imap to access the mailboxes. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 08:10:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E4B16A4D9 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593D043D5D for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5E0578E for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08382-02 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52A3E5734; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051218081002.52A3E5734@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2005-11-27 - 2005-12-17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:10:21 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 09:05:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69C516A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:05:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs1.arnes.si (avs1.arnes.si [193.2.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1189443D5D for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs1.arnes.si [193.2.1.74]) by avs1.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6BF36A150 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:05:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs1.arnes.si ([193.2.1.74]) by localhost (avs1.arnes.si [193.2.1.74]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47184-20 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:05:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs1.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id D820636A166 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:05:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] ([192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBI95rhZ010791 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:05:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:06:01 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: FreeBSD Q ML Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="==========A8CF3ACF5E39C5FB9CF7==========" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Subject: Long delay when sending mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:05:57 -0000 --==========A8CF3ACF5E39C5FB9CF7========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi! I have configured mail server on FreeBSD 5.4 with sendmail 8.13.5 and cyrus-imapd v2. I am also using client Mulberry (but also tested with Tbird, Outlook Express, Outlook). I use IMAP access with all the clients, the server is on the same network as clients (100 Mbit network). The issue is when I try to send several messages one after another I get smtp delay message and this sometimes takes for 30 sec to a minute. My sendmail has configured a smart host and also to accept unqualified domains. I have attached my sendmail config. What am I missing here? -- Sasa Stupar --==========A8CF3ACF5E39C5FB9CF7========== Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="freebsd.mc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="freebsd.mc"; size=7648 ZGl2ZXJ0KC0xKQojCiMgIFRoaXMgaXMgYSBnZW5lcmljIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gZmlsZSBmb3Ig RnJlZUJTRCA1LlggYW5kIGxhdGVyIHN5c3RlbXMuCiMgIElmIHlvdSB3YW50IHRvIGN1c3RvbWl6 ZSBpdCwgY29weSBpdCB0byBhIG5hbWUgYXBwcm9wcmlhdGUgZm9yIHlvdXIKIyAgZW52aXJvbm1l bnQgYW5kIGRvIHRoZSBtb2RpZmljYXRpb25zIHRoZXJlLgojCiMgIFRoZSBiZXN0IGRvY3VtZW50 YXRpb24gZm9yIHRoaXMgLm1jIGZpbGUgaXM6CiMgIC91c3Ivc2hhcmUvc2VuZG1haWwvY2YvUkVB RE1FIG9yCiMgIC91c3Ivc3JjL2NvbnRyaWIvc2VuZG1haWwvY2YvUkVBRE1FCiMKCmRpdmVydCgw KQpWRVJTSU9OSUQoYCRGcmVlQlNEOiBzcmMvZXRjL3NlbmRtYWlsL2ZyZWVic2QubWMsdiAxLjI5 IDIwMDMvMTIvMjQgMjE6MTU6MDkgZ3NoYXBpcm8gRXhwICQnKQpPU1RZUEUoZnJlZWJzZDUpCmRu bCBkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZDRl9WRVJTSU9OJywgYFN1Ym1pdCcpZG5sCmRubCBkZWZpbmUoYF9fT1NU WVBFX18nLGAnKWRubCBkaXJ0eSBoYWNrIHRvIGtlZXAgcHJvdG8ubTQgZnJvbSBjb21wbGFpbmlu ZwpkbmwgZGVmaW5lKGBfVVNFX0RFQ05FVF9TWU5UQVhfJywgYDEnKWRubCBzdXBwb3J0IERFQ25l dApkbmwgZGVmaW5lKGBjb25mVElNRV9aT05FJywgYFVTRV9UWicpZG5sCmRubCBkZWZpbmUoYGNv bmZET05UX0lOSVRfR1JPVVBTJywgYFRydWUnKWRubApkbmwgZGVmaW5lKGBjb25mQklORF9PUFRT JywgYFdvcmtBcm91bmRCcm9rZW5BQUFBJylkbmwKZG5sICMKZG5sICMgVW5jb21tZW50IGFuZCBl ZGl0IHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgbGluZSBpZiB5b3VyIG91dGdvaW5nIG1haWwgbmVlZHMgdG8KZG5s ICMgYmUgc2VudCBvdXQgdGhyb3VnaCBhbiBleHRlcm5hbCBtYWlsIHNlcnZlcjoKZG5sICMKZGVm aW5lKGBTTUFSVF9IT1NUJyxgbWFpbC5hcm5lcy5zaScpZG5sCmRubCAjCmRlZmluZShgY29uZkRP TUFJTl9OQU1FJyxgeG1haWwuaG9tZWxpbnV4Lm5ldCcpZG5sCmRlZmluZShgY29uZkRFRl9VU0VS X0lEJyxgbWFpbG51bGwnKQpkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZUUlVTVEVEX1VTRVInLGBtYWlsbnVsbCcpZG5s CmRubCBkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZBVVRPX1JFQlVJTEQnKWRubApkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZUT19DT05ORUNU JywgYDFtJylkbmwKZGVmaW5lKGBjb25mVFJZX05VTExfTVhfTElTVCcsdHJ1ZSlkbmwKZGVmaW5l KGBjb25mRE9OVF9QUk9CRV9JTlRFUkZBQ0VTJyx0cnVlKWRubApkZWZpbmUoYEFMSUFTX0ZJTEUn LGAvZXRjL21haWwvYWxpYXNlcycpZG5sCmRlZmluZShgU1RBVFVTX0ZJTEUnLCBgL2V0Yy9tYWls L3N0YXRpc3RpY3MnKWRubApkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZFQklORElSJyxgL3Vzci9saWJleGVjJylkbmwK ZGVmaW5lKGBjb25mVVNFUkRCX1NQRUMnLCBgL2V0Yy9tYWlsL3VzZXJkYi5kYicpZG5sCmRlZmlu ZShgY29uZlBSSVZBQ1lfRkxBR1MnLGBhdXRod2FybmluZ3Msbm92cmZ5LG5vZXhwbixub2V0cm4s cmVzdHJpY3RxcnVuLG5vYm9keXJldHVybicpZG5sCmRlZmluZShgY29uZkFVVEhfT1BUSU9OUycs IGBBJylkbmwKZGVmaW5lKGBjb25mTUFYX01FU1NBR0VfU0laRScsMzE0NDIyODApCmRubCAjCmRu bCAjIFRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgYWxsb3dzIHJlbGF5aW5nIGlmIHRoZSB1c2VyIGF1dGhlbnRpY2F0 ZXMsIGFuZCBkaXNhbGxvd3MKZG5sICMgcGxhaW50ZXh0IGF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIChQTEFJTi9M T0dJTikgb24gbm9uLVRMUyBsaW5rcwpkbmwgIwpkbmwgZGVmaW5lKGBjb25mQVVUSF9PUFRJT05T JywgYEEgcCcpZG5sCmRubCAjIApkbmwgIyBQTEFJTiBpcyB0aGUgcHJlZmVycmVkIHBsYWludGV4 dCBhdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBtZXRob2QgYW5kIHVzZWQgYnkKZG5sICMgTW96aWxsYSBNYWlsIGFu ZCBFdm9sdXRpb24sIHRob3VnaCBPdXRsb29rIEV4cHJlc3MgYW5kIG90aGVyIE1VQXMgZG8KZG5s ICMgdXNlIExPR0lOLiBPdGhlciBtZWNoYW5pc21zIHNob3VsZCBiZSB1c2VkIGlmIHRoZSBjb25u ZWN0aW9uIGlzIG5vdApkbmwgIyBndWFyYW50ZWVkIHNlY3VyZS4KZG5sICMKVFJVU1RfQVVUSF9N RUNIKGBMT0dJTiBQTEFJTicpZG5sCmRlZmluZShgY29uZkFVVEhfTUVDSEFOSVNNUycsIGBMT0dJ TiBQTEFJTicpZG5sCmRubCBkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZERUZfQVVUSF9JTkZPJywgYC9ldGMvbWFpbC9h dXRoLWluZm8nKWRubApkbmwgIwpkbmwgIyBSdWRpbWVudGFyeSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBvbiBjcmVh dGluZyBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZXMgZm9yIHNlbmRtYWlsIFRMUzoKZG5sICMgICAgIG1ha2UgLUMgL3Vz ci9zaGFyZS9zc2wvY2VydHMgdXNhZ2UKZG5sICMKZGVmaW5lKGBDRVJUX0RJUicsIGAvZXRjL21h aWwvY2VydHMnKWRubApkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZDQUNFUlRfUEFUSCcsIGBDRVJUX0RJUicpZG5sCmRl ZmluZShgY29uZkNBQ0VSVCcsIGBDRVJUX0RJUi9zZW5kbWFpbGNlcnQucGVtJylkbmwKZGVmaW5l KGBjb25mU0VSVkVSX0NFUlQnLCBgQ0VSVF9ESVIvc2VuZG1haWxjZXJ0LnBlbScpZG5sCmRlZmlu ZShgY29uZlNFUlZFUl9LRVknLCBgQ0VSVF9ESVIvc2VuZG1haWxrZXkucGVtJylkbmwKZGVmaW5l KGBjb25mQ0xJRU5UX0NFUlQnLCBgQ0VSVF9ESVIvc2VuZG1haWxjZXJ0LnBlbScpZG5sCmRlZmlu ZShgY29uZkNMSUVOVF9LRVknLCBgQ0VSVF9ESVIvc2VuZG1haWxrZXkucGVtJylkbmwKZG5sICMK ZG5sICMgVGhpcyBhbGxvd3Mgc2VuZG1haWwgdG8gdXNlIGEga2V5ZmlsZSB0aGF0IGlzIHNoYXJl ZCB3aXRoIE9wZW5MREFQJ3MKZG5sICMgc2xhcGQsIHdoaWNoIHJlcXVpcmVzIHRoZSBmaWxlIHRv IGJlIHJlYWRibGUgYnkgZ3JvdXAgbGRhcApkbmwgIwpkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZET05UX0JMQU1FX1NF TkRNQUlMJyxgR3JvdXBSZWFkYWJsZVNBU0xEQkZpbGUnKWRubApkbmwgIwpkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZU T19RVUVVRVdBUk4nLCBgNGgnKWRubApkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZUT19RVUVVRVJFVFVSTicsIGA1ZCcp ZG5sCmRubCBkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZRVUVVRV9MQScsIGAxMicpZG5sCmRubCBkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZS RUZVU0VfTEEnLCBgMTgnKWRubApkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZUT19JREVOVCcsIGAwJylkbmwKRkVBVFVS RShgZGVsYXlfY2hlY2tzJylkbmwKRkVBVFVSRShgbm9fZGVmYXVsdF9tc2EnLGBkbmwnKWRubApG RUFUVVJFKGBzbXJzaCcsYC91c3IvbGliZXhlYy9zbXJzaCcpIGRubApGRUFUVVJFKGBtYWlsZXJ0 YWJsZScsYGhhc2ggLW8gL2V0Yy9tYWlsL21haWxlcnRhYmxlLmRiJylkbmwKRkVBVFVSRShgdmly dHVzZXJ0YWJsZScsYGhhc2ggLW8gL2V0Yy9tYWlsL3ZpcnR1c2VydGFibGUuZGInKWRubApGRUFU VVJFKGBnZW5lcmljc3RhYmxlJyxgaGFzaCAvZXRjL21haWwvZ2VuZXJpY3N0YWJsZScpZG5sCkdF TkVSSUNTX0RPTUFJTl9GSUxFKGAvZXRjL21haWwvZ2VuZXJpY3MtZG9tYWlucycpZG5sCkZFQVRV UkUoYHJlZGlyZWN0JylkbmwKRkVBVFVSRShgYWx3YXlzX2FkZF9kb21haW4nKWRubApGRUFUVVJF KGB1c2VfY3dfZmlsZScpZG5sCkZFQVRVUkUoYHVzZV9jdF9maWxlJylkbmwKZG5sICMKZG5sICMg VGhlIC10IG9wdGlvbiB3aWxsIHJldHJ5IGRlbGl2ZXJ5IGlmIGUuZy4gdGhlIHVzZXIgcnVucyBv dmVyIGhpcyBxdW90YS4KZG5sICMKRkVBVFVSRShgYWNjZXNzX2RiJyxgaGFzaCAtVDxUTVBGPiAt byAvZXRjL21haWwvYWNjZXNzLmRiJylkbmwKRkVBVFVSRShgYmxhY2tsaXN0X3JlY2lwaWVudHMn KWRubApkbmwgRkVBVFVSRShgZG5zYmwnLGBpcHdob2lzLnJmYy1pZ25vcmFudC5vcmcnLGAiNTUw IE1haWwgZnJvbSAiICQme2NsaWVudF9hZGRyfSAiIHJlZnVzZWQuIFJlamVjdGVkIGZvciBiYWQg V0hPSVMgaW5mbyBvbiBJUCBvZiB5b3VyIFNNVFAgc2VydmVyIC0gc2VlIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucmZj LWlnbm9yYW50Lm9yZy8iJylkbmwKRkVBVFVSRShgZG5zYmwnLCBgcHJveGllcy5ibGFja2hvbGVz LmVhc3luZXQubmwnLCBgIjU1MCA1LjcuMSBBQ0NFU1MgREVOSUVEIHRvIE9QRU4gUFJPWFkgU0VS VkVSICIkJntjbGllbnRfbmFtZX0iIGJ5IGVhc3luZXQubmwgRE5TQkwgIChodHRwOi8vcHJveGll cy5ibGFja2hvbGVzLmVhc3luZXQubmwvZXJyb3JzLmh0bWwpIicsIGAnKWRubApGRUFUVVJFKGBl bmhkbnNibCcsIGBibC5zcGFtY29wLm5ldCcsIGAiU3BhbSBibG9ja2VkIHNlZTogaHR0cDovL3Nw YW1jb3AubmV0L2JsLnNodG1sPyIkJntjbGllbnRfYWRkcn0nLCBgdCcpZG5sCkZFQVRVUkUoYGRu c2JsJywgYHJlbGF5cy5vcmRiLm9yZycsIGAiNTUwIEVtYWlsIHJlamVjdGVkIGR1ZSB0byBzZW5k aW5nIHNlcnZlciBtaXNjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIC0gc2VlIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cub3JkYi5vcmcvZmFx L1wjd2h5X3JlamVjdGVkIicpZG5sCkZFQVRVUkUoZG5zYmwsYHNibC14Ymwuc3BhbWhhdXMub3Jn JyxgTWVzc2FnZSBmcm9tICQme2NsaWVudF9hZGRyfSByZWplY3RlZCAtIHNlZSBodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnNwYW1oYXVzLm9yZy8nKWRubApFWFBPU0VEX1VTRVIoYHJvb3QnKWRubApkbmwgIwpkbmwgIyBU aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGNhdXNlcyBzZW5kbWFpbCB0byBvbmx5IGxpc3RlbiBvbiB0aGUgSVB2NCBs b29wYmFjayBhZGRyZXNzCmRubCAjIDEyNy4wLjAuMSBhbmQgbm90IG9uIGFueSBvdGhlciBuZXR3 b3JrIGRldmljZXMuIFJlbW92ZSB0aGUgbG9vcGJhY2sKZG5sICMgYWRkcmVzcyByZXN0cmljdGlv biB0byBhY2NlcHQgZW1haWwgZnJvbSB0aGUgaW50ZXJuZXQgb3IgaW50cmFuZXQuCmRubCAjCkRB RU1PTl9PUFRJT05TKGBQb3J0PXNtdHAsIE5hbWU9TVRBJylkbmwKZG5sICMKZG5sICMgVGhlIGZv bGxvd2luZyBjYXVzZXMgc2VuZG1haWwgdG8gYWRkaXRpb25hbGx5IGxpc3RlbiB0byBwb3J0IDU4 NyBmb3IKZG5sICMgbWFpbCBmcm9tIE1VQXMgdGhhdCBhdXRoZW50aWNhdGUuIFJvYW1pbmcgdXNl cnMgd2hvIGNhbid0IHJlYWNoIHRoZWlyCmRubCAjIHByZWZlcnJlZCBzZW5kbWFpbCBkYWVtb24g ZHVlIHRvIHBvcnQgMjUgYmVpbmcgYmxvY2tlZCBvciByZWRpcmVjdGVkIGZpbmQKZG5sICMgdGhp cyB1c2VmdWwuCmRubCAjCkRBRU1PTl9PUFRJT05TKGBQb3J0PXN1Ym1pc3Npb24sIE5hbWU9TVNB LCBNPUVhJylkbmwKZG5sICMKZG5sICMgVGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBjYXVzZXMgc2VuZG1haWwgdG8g YWRkaXRpb25hbGx5IGxpc3RlbiB0byBwb3J0IDQ2NSwgYnV0CmRubCAjIHN0YXJ0aW5nIGltbWVk aWF0ZWx5IGluIFRMUyBtb2RlIHVwb24gY29ubmVjdGluZy4gUG9ydCAyNSBvciA1ODcgZm9sbG93 ZWQKZG5sICMgYnkgU1RBUlRUTFMgaXMgcHJlZmVycmVkLCBidXQgcm9hbWluZyBjbGllbnRzIHVz aW5nIE91dGxvb2sgRXhwcmVzcyBjYW4ndApkbmwgIyBkbyBTVEFSVFRMUyBvbiBwb3J0cyBvdGhl ciB0aGFuIDI1LiBNb3ppbGxhIE1haWwgY2FuIE9OTFkgdXNlIFNUQVJUVExTCmRubCAjIGFuZCBk b2Vzbid0IHN1cHBvcnQgdGhlIGRlcHJlY2F0ZWQgc210cHM7IEV2b2x1dGlvbiA8MS4xLjEgdXNl cyBzbXRwcwpkbmwgIyB3aGVuIFNTTCBpcyBlbmFibGVkLS0gU1RBUlRUTFMgc3VwcG9ydCBpcyBh dmFpbGFibGUgaW4gdmVyc2lvbiAxLjEuMS4KZG5sICMKZG5sICMgRm9yIHRoaXMgdG8gd29yayB5 b3VyIE9wZW5TU0wgY2VydGlmaWNhdGVzIG11c3QgYmUgY29uZmlndXJlZC4KZG5sICMKREFFTU9O X09QVElPTlMoYFBvcnQ9c210cHMsIE5hbWU9VExTTVRBLCBNPXMnKWRubApkbmwgIwpkbmwgIyBU aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGNhdXNlcyBzZW5kbWFpbCB0byBhZGRpdGlvbmFsbHkgbGlzdGVuIG9uIHRo ZSBJUHY2IGxvb3BiYWNrCmRubCAjIGRldmljZS4gUmVtb3ZlIHRoZSBsb29wYmFjayBhZGRyZXNz IHJlc3RyaWN0aW9uIGxpc3RlbiB0byB0aGUgbmV0d29yay4KZG5sICMKZG5sICMgTk9URTogYmlu ZGluZyBib3RoIElQdjQgYW5kIElQdjYgZGFlbW9uIHRvIHRoZSBzYW1lIHBvcnQgcmVxdWlyZXMK ZG5sICMgICAgICAgYSBrZXJuZWwgcGF0Y2gKZG5sICMKZG5sIERBRU1PTl9PUFRJT05TKGBwb3J0 PXNtdHAsQWRkcj06OjEsIE5hbWU9TVRBLXY2LCBGYW1pbHk9aW5ldDYnKWRubApkbmwgIwpkbmwg IyBXZSBzdHJvbmdseSByZWNvbW1lbmQgbm90IGFjY2VwdGluZyB1bnJlc29sdmFibGUgZG9tYWlu cyBpZiB5b3Ugd2FudCB0bwpkbmwgIyBwcm90ZWN0IHlvdXJzZWxmIGZyb20gc3BhbS4gSG93ZXZl ciwgdGhlIGxhcHRvcCBhbmQgdXNlcnMgb24gY29tcHV0ZXJzCmRubCAjIHRoYXQgZG8gbm90IGhh dmUgMjR4NyBETlMgZG8gbmVlZCB0aGlzLgpkbmwgIwpGRUFUVVJFKGBhY2NlcHRfdW5yZXNvbHZh YmxlX2RvbWFpbnMnKWRubApGRUFUVVJFKGBhY2NlcHRfdW5xdWFsaWZpZWRfc2VuZGVycycpZG5s CmRlZmluZShgY29uZkRJUkVDVF9TVUJNSVNTSU9OX01PRElGSUVSUycsIGBDJylkbmwKZG5sICMK ZG5sIEZFQVRVUkUoYHJlbGF5X2Jhc2VkX29uX01YJylkbmwKZG5sICMgCmRubCAjIEFsc28gYWNj ZXB0IGVtYWlsIHNlbnQgdG8gImxvY2FsaG9zdC5sb2NhbGRvbWFpbiIgYXMgbG9jYWwgZW1haWwu CkxPQ0FMX0RPTUFJTihgbG9jYWxob3N0LmxvY2FsZG9tYWluIG1pZzI5IGxvY2FsaG9zdCcpZG5s CmRubCAjIApkbmwgIwpkbmwgIyBUaGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGV4YW1wbGUgbWFrZXMgbWFpbCBmcm9t IHRoaXMgaG9zdCBhbmQgYW55IGFkZGl0aW9uYWwKZG5sICMgc3BlY2lmaWVkIGRvbWFpbnMgYXBw ZWFyIHRvIGJlIHNlbnQgZnJvbSBteWRvbWFpbi5jb20KZG5sICMKTUFTUVVFUkFERV9BUyhgeG1h aWwuaG9tZWxpbnV4Lm5ldCcpZG5sCmRubCAjCmRubCAjIG1hc3F1ZXJhZGUgbm90IGp1c3QgdGhl IGhlYWRlcnMsIGJ1dCB0aGUgZW52ZWxvcGUgYXMgd2VsbApkbmwgIwpGRUFUVVJFKG1hc3F1ZXJh ZGVfZW52ZWxvcGUpZG5sCmRubCAjCmRubCAjIG1hc3F1ZXJhZGUgbm90IGp1c3QgQG15ZG9tYWlu YWxpYXMuY29tLCBidXQgQCoubXlkb21haW5hbGlhcy5jb20gYXMgd2VsbApkbmwgIwpGRUFUVVJF KG1hc3F1ZXJhZGVfZW50aXJlX2RvbWFpbilkbmwKZG5sICMKRkVBVFVSRShgbGltaXRlZF9tYXNx dWVyYWRlJylkbmwKTUFTUVVFUkFERV9ET01BSU4oYGxvY2FsaG9zdC5sb2NhbGRvbWFpbiBsb2Nh bGhvc3QgbWlnMjkgbWlnMjkud29ya2dyb3VwJylkbmwKSU5QVVRfTUFJTF9GSUxURVIoYGNsYW1h dicsYFM9bG9jYWw6L3Zhci9ydW4vY2xhbWF2L2NsbWlsdGVyLnNvY2ssIEY9LCBUPVM6NG07Ujo0 bScpZG5sCmRubCBJTlBVVF9NQUlMX0ZJTFRFUihgbm9kMzJzbWZpJywgYFM9bG9jYWw6L3Zhci9y dW4vbm9kMzJzbWZpLnNvY2ssIEY9VCwgVD1TOjJtO1I6Mm07RTo1bScpZG5sCklOUFVUX01BSUxf RklMVEVSKGBzcGFtYXNzYXNzaW4nLCBgUz1sb2NhbDovdmFyL3J1bi9zcGFtYXNzLW1pbHRlci5z b2NrLCBGPSwgVD1DOjE1bTtTOjRtO1I6NG07RToxMG0nKWRubApkZWZpbmUoYGNvbmZNSUxURVJf TUFDUk9TX0NPTk5FQ1QnLGBiLCBqLCBfLCB7ZGFlbW9uX25hbWV9LCB7aWZfbmFtZX0sIHtpZl9h ZGRyfScpZG5sCmRlZmluZShgY29uZklOUFVUX01BSUxfRklMVEVSUycsYHNwYW1hc3Nhc3Npbiwg Y2xhbWF2JylkbmwKZGVmaW5lKGBjb25mTUFUQ0hfR0VDT1MnLGBUcnVlJylkbmwKZGVmaW5lKGBj b25mTE9DQUxfTUFJTEVSJywgYGN5cnVzdjInKWRubApNQUlMRVIoc210cClkbmwKTUFJTEVSKGN5 cnVzdjIpZG5sCg== --==========A8CF3ACF5E39C5FB9CF7==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 09:18:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F2F16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:18:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@mawer.org) Received: from mail26.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail26.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7048143D49 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:18:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@mawer.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c220-237-120-88.thorn1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.237.120.88]) by mail26.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBI9I2bE013944; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:18:05 +1100 Message-ID: <43A52954.8020805@mawer.org> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:18:12 +1100 From: Antony Mawer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Endries References: <43A2F7CE.2010603@endries.org> In-Reply-To: <43A2F7CE.2010603@endries.org> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090102060806060403060802" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding lines to /etc/rc.conf during sysinstall wihout being "REMOVED" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:18:12 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090102060806060403060802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 17/12/2005 4:22 AM, Josh Endries wrote: > Does anyone know the correct way to add lines to rc.conf without > sysinstall commenting them out and prepending "REMOVED" to them, > during an automated install.cfg routine? Currently I have a pkg I > made that adds stuff like ntp.conf and rc.conf, but all the lines in > my custom rc.conf are removed after the script finishes. > > I looked through the code for sysinstall but didn't see any way to > disable this behavior (my C isn't very good). What would be the > correct way to do this? I'm now having my pkg install a rc.d script > which cat's >> /etc/rc.conf... I hit this same problem in building a custom installation disc, and wound up extending sysinstall to have a shutdownNoRC that would function the same as the "shutdown" statement in an install.cfg, only without touching the rc.conf. This was useful for us, as we installed a custom rc.conf and did not want sysinstall to touch it. I also added a "poweroff" and "poweroffNoRC" methods that function the same as the "shutdown" statement, only power off the machine instead. This can be quite handy in a production line environment, when used in conjunction with the cdcontrol(1) command to eject the CD, prior to powering off the completed system. I've attached the patch if anyone is interested... perhaps if there is sufficient interest then someone could see about getting this committed. The attached patch is against 6.0-RELEASE. Regards Antony --------------090102060806060403060802 Content-Type: text/plain; name="sysinstall.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="sysinstall.diff" Index: usr.sbin/sysinstall/dispatch.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/dispatch.c,v retrieving revision 1.47 diff -u -r1.47 dispatch.c --- usr.sbin/sysinstall/dispatch.c 30 Aug 2004 21:03:09 -0000 1.47 +++ usr.sbin/sysinstall/dispatch.c 18 Nov 2005 02:11:20 -0000 @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ #include "list.h" static int dispatch_shutdown(dialogMenuItem *unused); +static int dispatch_shutdown_norc(dialogMenuItem *unused); +static int dispatch_poweroff(dialogMenuItem *unused); +static int dispatch_poweroff_norc(dialogMenuItem *unused); static int dispatch_systemExecute(dialogMenuItem *unused); static int dispatch_msgConfirm(dialogMenuItem *unused); static int dispatch_mediaClose(dialogMenuItem *unused); @@ -111,6 +114,9 @@ { "addGroup", userAddGroup }, { "addUser", userAddUser }, { "shutdown", dispatch_shutdown }, + { "shutdownNoRC", dispatch_shutdown_norc }, + { "poweroff", dispatch_poweroff }, + { "poweroffNoRC", dispatch_poweroff_norc }, { "system", dispatch_systemExecute }, { "dumpVariables", dump_variables }, { "tcpMenuSelect", tcpMenuSelect }, @@ -178,6 +184,27 @@ } static int +dispatch_shutdown_norc(dialogMenuItem *unused) +{ + systemShutdownNow(0, SHUTDOWN_NO_RC_CONF); + return DITEM_FAILURE; +} + +static int +dispatch_poweroff(dialogMenuItem *unused) +{ + systemShutdownNow(0, SHUTDOWN_POWEROFF); + return DITEM_FAILURE; +} + +static int +dispatch_poweroff_norc(dialogMenuItem *unused) +{ + systemShutdownNow(0, SHUTDOWN_POWEROFF | SHUTDOWN_NO_RC_CONF); + return DITEM_FAILURE; +} + +static int dispatch_systemExecute(dialogMenuItem *unused) { char *cmd = variable_get(VAR_COMMAND); Index: usr.sbin/sysinstall/sysinstall.8 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/sysinstall.8,v retrieving revision 1.69.2.1 diff -u -r1.69.2.1 sysinstall.8 --- usr.sbin/sysinstall/sysinstall.8 9 Oct 2005 03:48:42 -0000 1.69.2.1 +++ usr.sbin/sysinstall/sysinstall.8 18 Nov 2005 01:55:58 -0000 @@ -813,6 +813,26 @@ .Pp .Sy Variables : None +.It shutdownNoRC +Stop the script and terminate sysinstall, but do not touch +.Pa /etc/rc.conf . +.Pp +.Sy Variables : +None +.It poweroff +The same as +.Pa shutdown , +only power off the system (if possible) rather than rebooting. +.Pp +.Sy Variables : +None +.It poweroffNoRC +The same as +.Pa shutdownNoRC , +only power off the system (if possible) rather than rebooting. +.Pp +.Sy Variables : +None .It system Execute an arbitrary command with .Xr system 3 Index: usr.sbin/sysinstall/sysinstall.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/sysinstall.h,v retrieving revision 1.264.2.1 diff -u -r1.264.2.1 sysinstall.h --- usr.sbin/sysinstall/sysinstall.h 7 Oct 2005 15:56:30 -0000 1.264.2.1 +++ usr.sbin/sysinstall/sysinstall.h 18 Nov 2005 02:09:31 -0000 @@ -395,6 +395,10 @@ char extras[EXTRAS_FIELD_LEN]; } DevInfo; +/* systemShutdownNow bitfield flags */ +#define SHUTDOWN_POWEROFF 0x1 /* Power off after shutdown */ +#define SHUTDOWN_NO_RC_CONF 0x2 /* Don't attempt to update rc.conf */ + /*** Externs ***/ extern jmp_buf BailOut; /* Used to get the heck out */ @@ -808,6 +812,7 @@ /* system.c */ extern void systemInitialize(int argc, char **argv); extern void systemShutdown(int status); +extern void systemShutdownNow(int status, int shutdown_flags); extern int execExecute(char *cmd, char *name); extern int systemExecute(char *cmd); extern void systemSuspendDialog(void); Index: usr.sbin/sysinstall/system.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/system.c,v retrieving revision 1.124.2.1 diff -u -r1.124.2.1 system.c --- usr.sbin/sysinstall/system.c 17 Aug 2005 13:32:29 -0000 1.124.2.1 +++ usr.sbin/sysinstall/system.c 18 Nov 2005 02:10:32 -0000 @@ -235,12 +235,20 @@ void systemShutdown(int status) { + systemShutdownNow(status, 0); +} + +void +systemShutdownNow(int status, int shutdown_flags) +{ + /* If some media is open, close it down */ if (status >=0) mediaClose(); /* write out any changes to rc.conf .. */ - configRC_conf(); + if (!(shutdown_flags & SHUTDOWN_NO_RC_CONF)) + configRC_conf(); /* Shut down the dialog library */ if (DialogActive) { @@ -261,7 +269,10 @@ #if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__sparc64__) reboot(RB_HALT); #else - reboot(0); + if (shutdown_flags & SHUTDOWN_POWEROFF) + reboot(RB_HALT | RB_POWEROFF); + else + reboot(0); #endif } else --------------090102060806060403060802-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 09:34:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B1616A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:34:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CDF43D49 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:34:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBI9b2P33016; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:37:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Sasa Stupar" , , "Drew Tomlinson" Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:33:47 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:34:10 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >Theme Song) > > > > >--On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt > >wrote: > >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM >>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>> Theme Song) >>> >>>> >>>> Ted >>> >>> Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and >without polling: >>> ************** >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with >>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec >>> >>> This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. >>> >>> If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with >>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec >>> *************** >>> >>> BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11). >>> >> >> what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices >> in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in >> use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram >> of the setup, etc. etc. etc. >> >> The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. >> Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact >> duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get identical >> results. >> >> Ted >> > >OK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900 and 3C905C The 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD the driver was written without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot of hardware. I would say there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the ethernet. Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt. >NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel >Pro/100S Nics and >Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400 >with winxp >and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600. > Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularly steller combo, I would question that this system could saturate the ethernet, either. >Diagram: > >dmesg from the router: >---------------- >$ dmesg >Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. >Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #0: Wed Sep 7 13:49:09 CEST 2005 > root@fb411.neon1.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/M0N0WALL_GENERIC >Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (434.32-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 > >Features=0x183f9ffGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> >real memory = 201326592 (196608K bytes) >avail memory = 179142656 (174944K bytes) >Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc1006000. >Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot" at 0xc100609c. >Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled >md0: Preloaded image 11534336 bytes at 0xc0504d9c >md1: Malloc disk >Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdef0 >npx0: on motherboard >npx0: INT 16 interface >pcib0: on motherboard >pci0: on pcib0 >pcib1: at device >1.0 on pci0 >pci1: on pcib1 >isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >isa0: on isab0 >atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at >device 7.1 on >pci0 >ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 >ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 >uhci0: port >0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 >at device 7.2 on pci0 >usb0: on uhci0 >usb0: USB revision 1.0 >uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >chip1: port >0x5000-0x500f at >device 7.3 on pci0 >pci0: (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371) at 8.0 irq 11 >fxp0: port 0xd800-0xd83f mem >0xd0400000-0xd041ffff,0xd0460000-0xd0460fff irq 10 at device >15.0 on pci0 >fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:62:f6:06 >inphy0: on miibus0 >inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >fxp1: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem >0xd0420000-0xd043ffff,0xd0462000-0xd0462fff irq 12 at device >16.0 on pci0 >fxp1: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:9c:2a:16 >inphy1: on miibus1 >inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >fxp2: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem >0xd0440000-0xd045ffff,0xd0461000-0xd0461fff irq 7 at device 19.0 on pci0 >fxp2: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:8c:e4:f6 >inphy2: on miibus2 >inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >pmtimer0 on isa0 >fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq >2 on isa0 >fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold >fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >sio0: type 16550A, console >sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >BRIDGE 020214 loaded >IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default = block all, Logging = enabled >ad0: 3098MB [6296/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 >acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 >Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c >fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >ata0: resetting devices .. done >------------- > >If you need more just ask for it. You don't need to be angry. Peace. > OK, next question: ftp transfer like this uses large packets, rerun the test with ping -f with different ping packet sizes, post the results. Remember, routers have to deal with many sized packets. Ted > >-- >Sasa Stupar > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: >12/16/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 09:53:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FF316A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:53:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C5443D45 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBI9uBP33068; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:56:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Sasa Stupar" , Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:52:56 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051216153615.74872.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:53:14 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Danial Thom >Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 7:36 AM >To: Sasa Stupar; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >Song) > > > > >--- Sasa Stupar >wrote: > >> >> >> --On 15. december 2005 6:33 -0800 Drew >> Tomlinson >> wrote: >> >> > On 12/15/2005 12:33 AM Sasa Stupar wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> --On 14. december 2005 20:01 -0800 Ted >> Mittelstaedt >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>> From: Danial Thom >> [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:14 >> AM >> >>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Drew Tomlinson >> >>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps >> Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >> >>>> Song) >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> Well, if polling does no good for fxp, >> due to >> >>>>> the >> >>>>> hardware doing controlled interrupts, >> then why >> >>>>> does >> >>>>> the fxp driver even let you set it as an >> >>>>> option? >> >>>>> And why have many people who have enabled >> it on >> >>>>> fxp seen an improvement? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> They haven't, freebsd accounting doesn't >> work >> >>>> properly with polling enabled, and "they" >> don't >> >>>> have the ability to "know" if they are >> getting >> >>>> better performance, because "they", like >> you, >> >>>> have no clue what they're doing. How about >> all >> >>>> the idiots running MP with FreeBSD 4.x, >> when we >> >>>> know its just a waste of time? "they" all >> think >> >>>> they're getting worthwhile performance, >> because >> >>>> "they" are clueless. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> I would call them idiots if they are >> running MP under >> >>> FreeBSD and assuming that they are getting >> better >> >>> performance without actually testing for >> it. But >> >>> if they are just running MP because they >> happen to be >> >>> using an MP server, and they want to see if >> it will >> >>> work or not, who cares? >> >>> >> >>>> Maybe its tunable because they guy who >> wrote the >> >>>> driver made it a tunable? duh. I've yet to >> see >> >>>> one credible, controlled test that shows >> polling >> >>>> vs properly tuned interrupt-driven. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Hm, OK I believe that. As I recall I asked >> you earlier to >> >>> post the test setup you used for your own >> tests >> >>> "proving" that polling is worse, and you >> haven't >> >>> done so yet. Now you are saying you have >> never seen >> >>> a credible controlled test that shows >> polling vs >> >>> interrupt-driven. So I guess either you >> were blind >> >>> when you ran your own tests, or your own >> tests >> >>> are not credible, controlled polling vs >> properly >> >>> tuned interrupt-driven. As I have been >> saying >> >>> all along. Now your agreeing with me. >> >>> >> >>>> The only advantage of polling is that it >> will >> >>>> drop packets instead of going into >> livelock. The >> >>>> disadvantage is that it will drop packets >> when >> >>>> you have momentary bursts that would >> harmlessly >> >>>> put the machine into livelock. Thats about >> it. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Ah, now I think suddenly I see what the >> chip on your >> >>> shoulder is. You would rather have your >> router based >> >>> on FreeBSD go into livelock while packets >> stack up, >> >>> than drop anything. You tested the polling >> code and found >> >>> that yipes, it drops packets. >> >>> >> >>> What may I ask do you think that a Cisco or >> other >> >>> router does when you shove 10Mbt of traffic >> into it's >> >>> Ethernet interface destined for a host >> behind a T1 that >> >>> is plugged into the other end? (and no, >> source-quench >> >>> is not the correct answer) >> >>> >> >>> I think the scenario of it being better to >> momentary go into >> >>> livelock during an overload is only >> applicable to one scenario, >> >>> where the 2 interfaces in the router are >> the same capacity. >> >>> As in ethernet-to-ethernet routers. Most >> certainly not >> >>> Ethernet-to-serial routers, like what most >> routers are >> >>> that aren't on DSL lines. >> >>> >> >>> If you have a different understanding then >> please explain. >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I've read those datasheets as well and >> the >> >>>>> thing I >> >>>>> don't understand is that if you are >> pumping >> >>>>> 100Mbt >> >>>>> into an Etherexpress Pro/100 then if the >> card >> >>>>> will >> >>>>> not interrupt more than this throttled >> rate you >> >>>>> keep >> >>>>> talking about, then the card's interrupt >> >>>>> throttling >> >>>>> is going to limit the inbound bandwidth >> to >> >>>>> below >> >>>>> 100Mbt. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Wrong again, Ted. It scares me that you >> consider >> >>>> yourself knowlegable about this. You can >> process >> >>>> # interrupts X ring_size packets; not one >> per >> >>>> interrupt. You're only polling 1000x per >> second >> >>>> (or whatever you have hz set to), so why >> do you >> >>>> think that you have to interrupt for every >> packet >> >>>> to do 100Mb/s? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I never said anything about interrupting >> for every >> >>> packet, did I? Of course not since I know >> what >> >>> your talking about. However, it is you who >> are throwing >> >>> around the numbers - or were in your prior >> post - >> >>> regarding the fxp driver and hardware. Why >> should >> >>> I have to do the work digging around in the >> datasheets >> >>> and doing the math? >> >>> >> >>> Since you seem to be wanting to argue this >> from a >> >>> theory standpoint, then your only option is >> to >=== message truncated === > > > >Unfortunately your "test" is not controlled, >which is pretty typical of most OS testers. >Firstly, "efficiency" is the goal. How many >packets you can pump through a socket interface >is not an efficiency measurement. Actually, just about all benchmarks that are used in marketing routers, including the infamous "xxxx pps" benchmarks, pretty much only care about how many packets you can pump through the device. I've never seen a cpu utilization figure included in any of the Juniper and Cisco marketing literature which claims their product is faster then the competition. Not that I'm saying this is right, but it is how the market looks at things. >What was the >load on the machine during your test? how many >polls per second were being used? What was the >interrupt rate for the non-polling test? You >can't control the test, because iperf is a crappy >test. You're not trying to measure how much tcp >traffic you can push. There are way too many >variables. For example, an ethernet card that >iperf might test slower may use 1/2 the cpu of >another, which makes it a much better card. > That only matters if you need that extra CPU power. Assume for a second that you have 2 ethernet-to-ethernet routers, one with really efficient nics, and one with really poor nics. Both routers have enough power to completely saturate the ethernet with a packet stream going through them, no matter what the size of the packet used. You have tested and confirmed this. The router with the efficient nics will probably have a lot lower cpu utilization. No question there. But, if your need is for a simple router that does no access list filtering or any of that, on a protected internal network where the router won't get attacked, then you won't care if the CPU on the router is running at 90% utilization or 20% utilization. If the router with the inefficient nics is thousands of bucks cheaper, then you know what router most companies are going to buy. Once again, as I said before, not that I'm saying this is right, but it is how the market looks at things. >As the load increased, the # of polls/second will >increase. So unless you know what you're testing, >your test results will be wrong. > >Its too bad you're wasting so much time testing >things that should be obivious if you understood >how they worked. It does make it easier to make >money in the world, but its not doing the project >any good. > But is it really? Microsoft has answered the same kinds of inefficiency criticisms for time out of mind with a simple response: "buy a faster computer" They come out with a new OS like clockwork, every couple years, that is at least twice as slow as the predicessor. You are required to buy the latest fastest computer simply to keep the speed of the Windows experience the same speed as the prior version. You are arguing from the point that the FreeBSD Project shouldn't ship until they have completely optimized their "product" even if so doing delays the newer versions for years and years. The computer market seems to favor the Microsoft approach. Users will happily take a more inefficient operating system if it comes with the latest load of bells and whistles and crap in it. But they won't wait around for years and years for the FreeBSD project to make the code as efficient as possible. As I said before, not that I'm saying this is right, but it is how the market looks at things. So I question your assertion that "this isn't doing the project any good" no good from WHAT perspective? Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 10:15:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60A516A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:15:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (imap.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75AE43D4C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:15:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBIAFc6A077941; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:15:39 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43A536C4.50403@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:15:32 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051204) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jose Borquez References: <43A4BD8E.4060707@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <43A4BD8E.4060707@sbcglobal.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB370E96E0F9CA57A2B882146" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:15:39 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1211/Fri Dec 16 22:51:35 2005 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions group Subject: Re: Question about PHP5 vs mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:15:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB370E96E0F9CA57A2B882146 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jose Borquez wrote: > I am currently running FreeBSD 5.4 with Apache+mod_ssl 1.3.34 and I am > attempting to configure group office which is a project management > suite. I need php support and I am confused about what the difference > is between PHP5 and mod_php5. If I just install mod_php5 will that be > enough to allow php support? The www/mod_php5 port gives you just the Apache loadable module, no standalone php executable. The lang/php5 port gives you both the Apache loadable module and the standalone php executable. The lang/php5-cli port gives you just the standalone php executable. Finally, the www/php5-cgi port gives you a version of PHP *without* fastcgi support -- ie. it's tied to using the traditional CGI interface. (The php5-cgi port exists principally to be used with the www/suphp port) Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigB370E96E0F9CA57A2B882146 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDpTbK8Mjk52CukIwRA6QPAJ4zoRvwGuyTpyAihdZB/KwOCuEDPACdEpsY vnxMN10/f8snhaTFhadzZEE= =pTZP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB370E96E0F9CA57A2B882146-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 10:18:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EEB16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk (rutherford.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C794043D45 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:18:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from [82.71.1.109] (helo=[10.0.1.166]) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Envcs-0006WL-L5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:18:49 +0000 Message-ID: <43A53747.80706@thingy.apana.org.au> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:17:43 +0000 From: David Gerard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051215134815.GA33024@peach> <200512180418.26053.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <200512180418.26053.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.71.1.109] Subject: Re: foobarred installation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:18:51 -0000 RW wrote: > From what I've read I wouldn't recommend amd64 for a desktop, as two many > things are broken, for example 3-d support for your nvidia card. That's a pity ... I was thinking in terms of an uber-l33t dual-AMD64 beast machine running FreeBSD 6 (or maybe 7 by the time I get around to it) for my next desktop. (Not that I ever sit at my desktop any more, and am about to repurpose my FBSD 5 desktop as FBSD 6 and very much a household *server*.) Is there a list or project page on precisely what needs fixing on amd64? (I could always run Ubuntu, but I have my laptop for that ...) - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 10:21:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D5F16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:21:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs3.arnes.si (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3651C43D4C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:21:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58AB1D791A; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:20:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs3.arnes.si ([193.2.1.68]) by localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26771-08; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:20:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72691D7902; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:20:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] ([192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBIAKqQ0011151; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:20:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:21:01 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: Ted Mittelstaedt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <6F4719B836FB9479D8754136@[192.168.10.249]> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Cc: Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:21:01 -0000 --On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM >> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >> Theme Song) >> >> >> >> >> --On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM >>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>> Theme Song) >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ted >>>> >>>> Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and >> without polling: >>>> ************** >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with >>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec >>>> >>>> This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. >>>> >>>> If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with >>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec >>>> *************** >>>> >>>> BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11). >>>> >>> >>> what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices >>> in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in >>> use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram >>> of the setup, etc. etc. etc. >>> >>> The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. >>> Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact >>> duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get identical >>> results. >>> >>> Ted >>> >> >> OK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900 and 3C905C > > The 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD the driver was > written > without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot of hardware. I would > say > there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the > ethernet. > Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt. > >> NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel >> Pro/100S Nics and >> Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400 >> with winxp >> and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600. >> > > Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularly steller combo, > I would question that this system could saturate the ethernet, either. > >> Diagram: >> >> dmesg from the router: >> ---------------- >> $ dmesg >> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. >> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #0: Wed Sep 7 13:49:09 CEST 2005 >> root@fb411.neon1.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/M0N0WALL_GENERIC >> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >> CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (434.32-MHz 686-class CPU) >> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 >> >> Features=0x183f9ff> GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> >> real memory = 201326592 (196608K bytes) >> avail memory = 179142656 (174944K bytes) >> Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc1006000. >> Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot" at 0xc100609c. >> Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled >> md0: Preloaded image 11534336 bytes at 0xc0504d9c >> md1: Malloc disk >> Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdef0 >> npx0: on motherboard >> npx0: INT 16 interface >> pcib0: on motherboard >> pci0: on pcib0 >> pcib1: at device >> 1.0 on pci0 >> pci1: on pcib1 >> isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >> isa0: on isab0 >> atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at >> device 7.1 on >> pci0 >> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 >> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 >> uhci0: port >> 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 >> at device 7.2 on pci0 >> usb0: on uhci0 >> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >> chip1: port >> 0x5000-0x500f at >> device 7.3 on pci0 >> pci0: (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371) at 8.0 irq 11 >> fxp0: port 0xd800-0xd83f mem >> 0xd0400000-0xd041ffff,0xd0460000-0xd0460fff irq 10 at device >> 15.0 on pci0 >> fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:62:f6:06 >> inphy0: on miibus0 >> inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >> fxp1: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem >> 0xd0420000-0xd043ffff,0xd0462000-0xd0462fff irq 12 at device >> 16.0 on pci0 >> fxp1: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:9c:2a:16 >> inphy1: on miibus1 >> inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >> fxp2: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem >> 0xd0440000-0xd045ffff,0xd0461000-0xd0461fff irq 7 at device 19.0 on pci0 >> fxp2: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:8c:e4:f6 >> inphy2: on miibus2 >> inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >> pmtimer0 on isa0 >> fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq >> 2 on isa0 >> fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold >> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >> atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >> sio0: type 16550A, console >> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >> BRIDGE 020214 loaded >> IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >> IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default = block all, Logging = enabled >> ad0: 3098MB [6296/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 >> acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 >> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c >> fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >> fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >> fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >> ata0: resetting devices .. done >> ------------- >> >> If you need more just ask for it. You don't need to be angry. Peace. >> > > OK, next question: > > ftp transfer like this uses large packets, rerun the test with ping -f > with different ping packet sizes, post the results. > > Remember, routers have to deal with many sized packets. > > Ted > Interesting. I have tested like you've said and I could ping with packet size 1450 bytes. Everything bigger is telling that "packet must be fragmented but DF is set up". This is of course pinging from winxp to server. Times until size 1450 bytes are <= 1 ms TTL 63 ms. Sorry for not posting the results but my winxp are in my native language and not in english. -- Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 10:30:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8329916A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:30:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0005043D5E for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:30:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-231.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.231]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6804CFE0; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:39:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F41508B5; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:29:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43A53A5D.7000505@spray.se> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:30:53 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Walker References: <457e0a100512170401w62fe403es8593878b303700a4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <457e0a100512170401w62fe403es8593878b303700a4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CardBus problems. $PIR: ROUTE_INTERRUPT Failed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:30:45 -0000 Andrew Walker schrieb: > [...] > cbb0: mem 0x20822000-0x20822fff at device > 2.0 on pci0 > cardbus0: on cbb0 > cbb0: mem 0x20821000-0x20821fff at device > 2.1 on pci0 > cardbus0: on cbb1 > $PIR: ROUTE_INTERRUPT failed. > cbb: Unable to map IRQ... > device_attach: cbb1 attach returned 12 > [...] I had similar errors with my Thinkpad 760XL. Try FreeBSD 4.11 and if this work you can mostly use 5.x by using a custom kernel with device pcic device card instead of device cbb device pccard device cardbus This is because a new pccard bus driver infrastructure was added in FreeBSD 5 and the old was removed as alternative in 6. The new one doesn't work with old ISA hardware. Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 10:33:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1555216A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:33:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3D643D45 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:33:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBIAa7P33641; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:36:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Sasa Stupar" , Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:32:52 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <6F4719B836FB9479D8754136@[192.168.10.249]> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:33:04 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >Theme Song) > > > > >--On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt > >wrote: > >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM >>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>> Theme Song) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM >>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>> Theme Song) >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ted >>>>> >>>>> Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and >>> without polling: >>>>> ************** >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with >>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec >>>>> >>>>> This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. >>>>> >>>>> If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with >>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec >>>>> *************** >>>>> >>>>> BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11). >>>>> >>>> >>>> what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices >>>> in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in >>>> use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram >>>> of the setup, etc. etc. etc. >>>> >>>> The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. >>>> Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact >>>> duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get identical >>>> results. >>>> >>>> Ted >>>> >>> >>> OK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900 >and 3C905C >> >> The 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD the driver was >> written >> without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot of hardware. I would >> say >> there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the >> ethernet. >> Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt. >> >>> NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel >>> Pro/100S Nics and >>> Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400 >>> with winxp >>> and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600. >>> >> >> Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularly >steller combo, >> I would question that this system could saturate the ethernet, either. >> >>> Diagram: >>> >>> dmesg from the router: >>> ---------------- >>> $ dmesg >>> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. >>> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, >1992, 1993, 1994 >>> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >>> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #0: Wed Sep 7 13:49:09 CEST 2005 >>> root@fb411.neon1.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/M0N0WALL_GENERIC >>> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >>> CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (434.32-MHz 686-class CPU) >>> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 >>> >>> Features=0x183f9ff>> GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> >>> real memory = 201326592 (196608K bytes) >>> avail memory = 179142656 (174944K bytes) >>> Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc1006000. >>> Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot" at 0xc100609c. >>> Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled >>> md0: Preloaded image 11534336 bytes at 0xc0504d9c >>> md1: Malloc disk >>> Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdef0 >>> npx0: on motherboard >>> npx0: INT 16 interface >>> pcib0: on motherboard >>> pci0: on pcib0 >>> pcib1: at device >>> 1.0 on pci0 >>> pci1: on pcib1 >>> isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >>> isa0: on isab0 >>> atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at >>> device 7.1 on >>> pci0 >>> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 >>> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 >>> uhci0: port >>> 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 >>> at device 7.2 on pci0 >>> usb0: on uhci0 >>> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >>> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >>> chip1: port >>> 0x5000-0x500f at >>> device 7.3 on pci0 >>> pci0: (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371) at 8.0 irq 11 >>> fxp0: port 0xd800-0xd83f mem >>> 0xd0400000-0xd041ffff,0xd0460000-0xd0460fff irq 10 at device >>> 15.0 on pci0 >>> fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:62:f6:06 >>> inphy0: on miibus0 >>> inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>> fxp1: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem >>> 0xd0420000-0xd043ffff,0xd0462000-0xd0462fff irq 12 at device >>> 16.0 on pci0 >>> fxp1: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:9c:2a:16 >>> inphy1: on miibus1 >>> inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>> fxp2: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem >>> 0xd0440000-0xd045ffff,0xd0461000-0xd0461fff irq 7 at device >19.0 on pci0 >>> fxp2: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:8c:e4:f6 >>> inphy2: on miibus2 >>> inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>> pmtimer0 on isa0 >>> fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq >>> 2 on isa0 >>> fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold >>> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >>> atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >>> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >>> sio0: type 16550A, console >>> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >>> BRIDGE 020214 loaded >>> IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >>> IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default = block all, >Logging = enabled >>> ad0: 3098MB [6296/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 >>> acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 >>> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c >>> fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>> fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>> fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>> ata0: resetting devices .. done >>> ------------- >>> >>> If you need more just ask for it. You don't need to be angry. Peace. >>> >> >> OK, next question: >> >> ftp transfer like this uses large packets, rerun the test with ping -f >> with different ping packet sizes, post the results. >> >> Remember, routers have to deal with many sized packets. >> >> Ted >> > >Interesting. I have tested like you've said and I could ping >with packet >size 1450 bytes. Everything bigger is telling that "packet must be >fragmented but DF is set up". This is of course pinging from winxp to >server. That is normal since under winxp ping sets the DF bit I believe. The larger packets are not what matters, the smaller packets are more interesting. I find it hard to believe your getting the same throughput with flood pinging with 56 byte packets. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 10:42:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC1616A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:42:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th.linton@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1F243D80 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th.linton@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so316338nfe for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:42:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sPdIh7sCX6pDGtweCjmcm03UAibVWxgaRzojnIFGoqYH6MINPpeBWtYTfL9EaD50TDqwEtYmO+qQlm3XtPavuKwcq7nLLFVceZvn4b56+8oXZYWJ6U/1kvpW/MEr9l2n5s2WEx3Y8XcCzt394H6Mqayco1Cb1dR4oQEKZtVHt/s= Received: by 10.48.12.20 with SMTP id 20mr202000nfl; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:42:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.232.8 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:42:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:42:03 +0100 From: Thomas Linton To: Olivier Nicole In-Reply-To: <200512180605.jBI652Vj020707@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <001801c60329$7ce12470$6409a8c0@satellite> <200512180605.jBI652Vj020707@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Cc: dmehler26@woh.rr.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: webmail solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:42:16 -0000 I played with http://www.squirrelmail.org/ in combination with postfix, which was to me pretty good. My ISP (www.inode.at) is porviding their webmail service also via squirrelmail (they changed the look and feel-but it's still squirrelmail). On 12/18/05, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > I'm looking for experiences with a webmail solution. I want to use > > postfix as my mta and on a freebsd6 machine. The users who will be usin= g > the > > server probably would do better with a webmail package so they can get = to > it > > from anywhere. The box already has apache and php so i don't think that= 'll > > be an issue. One thing i'm uncertain is whether to offer direct pop/ima= p > or > > their equivalent encrypted counterparts or just do it all through webma= il. > > I am using imp from the ports. It need some pop/imap to access the > mailboxes. > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 10:50:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17FC16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:50:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6D243D53 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:50:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-231.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.231]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2F94D00C; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:59:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E38508B5; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:49:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43A53F1C.9030200@spray.se> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:51:08 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gustavo Parrini References: <43A4E20F.2050207@tdf.com.br> In-Reply-To: <43A4E20F.2050207@tdf.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to make init(8) run a daemon to me?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:50:57 -0000 Gustavo Parrini schrieb: > I'm having a pretty hard time trying to figure out how > can I get init(8) to run a daemon and respawn it if it > crashes. By the time I was a Linux user, it was done by > adding a line in /etc/inittab and it was all... > > I know that it must be done in /etc/ttys but I couldn't > find any syntax example after searching the FreeBSD manpages, > maillists, Handbook and Google. This is an example for /etc/ttys: "" "/bin/sleep 12" unknown on secure Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 11:00:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E8A16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:00:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs1.arnes.si (avs1.arnes.si [193.2.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E24843D53 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:00:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs1.arnes.si [193.2.1.74]) by avs1.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4082D36A165; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:00:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs1.arnes.si ([193.2.1.74]) by localhost (avs1.arnes.si [193.2.1.74]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52942-03; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:00:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs1.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C3536A13F; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:00:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] ([192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBIB08rA011387; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:00:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:00:16 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: Ted Mittelstaedt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <41C483468621896258B324AD@[192.168.10.249]> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Cc: Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:00:39 -0000 --On 18. december 2005 2:32 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt =20 wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM >> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >> Theme Song) >> >> >> >> >> --On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM >>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>> Theme Song) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM >>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>>> Theme Song) >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ted >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and >>>> without polling: >>>>>> ************** >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with >>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec >>>>>> >>>>>> This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with >>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec >>>>>> *************** >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices >>>>> in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in >>>>> use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram >>>>> of the setup, etc. etc. etc. >>>>> >>>>> The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. >>>>> Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact >>>>> duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get identical >>>>> results. >>>>> >>>>> Ted >>>>> >>>> >>>> OK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900 >> and 3C905C >>> >>> The 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD the driver was >>> written >>> without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot of hardware. I would >>> say >>> there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the >>> ethernet. >>> Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt. >>> >>>> NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel >>>> Pro/100S Nics and >>>> Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400 >>>> with winxp >>>> and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600. >>>> >>> >>> Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularly >> steller combo, >>> I would question that this system could saturate the ethernet, either. >>> >>>> Diagram: >>>> >>>> dmesg from the router: >>>> ---------------- >>>> $ dmesg >>>> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. >>>> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, >> 1992, 1993, 1994 >>>> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >>>> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #0: Wed Sep 7 13:49:09 CEST 2005 >>>> root@fb411.neon1.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/M0N0WALL_GENERIC >>>> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >>>> CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (434.32-MHz 686-class CPU) >>>> Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0x665 Stepping =3D 5 >>>> >>>> Features=3D0x183f9ff>>> GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> >>>> real memory =3D 201326592 (196608K bytes) >>>> avail memory =3D 179142656 (174944K bytes) >>>> Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc1006000. >>>> Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot" at 0xc100609c. >>>> Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled >>>> md0: Preloaded image 11534336 bytes at 0xc0504d9c >>>> md1: Malloc disk >>>> Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdef0 >>>> npx0: on motherboard >>>> npx0: INT 16 interface >>>> pcib0: on motherboard >>>> pci0: on pcib0 >>>> pcib1: at device >>>> 1.0 on pci0 >>>> pci1: on pcib1 >>>> isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >>>> isa0: on isab0 >>>> atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at >>>> device 7.1 on >>>> pci0 >>>> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 >>>> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 >>>> uhci0: port >>>> 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 >>>> at device 7.2 on pci0 >>>> usb0: on uhci0 >>>> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >>>> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>>> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >>>> chip1: port >>>> 0x5000-0x500f at >>>> device 7.3 on pci0 >>>> pci0: (vendor=3D0x1274, dev=3D0x1371) at 8.0 irq 11 >>>> fxp0: port 0xd800-0xd83f mem >>>> 0xd0400000-0xd041ffff,0xd0460000-0xd0460fff irq 10 at device >>>> 15.0 on pci0 >>>> fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:62:f6:06 >>>> inphy0: on miibus0 >>>> inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>> fxp1: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem >>>> 0xd0420000-0xd043ffff,0xd0462000-0xd0462fff irq 12 at device >>>> 16.0 on pci0 >>>> fxp1: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:9c:2a:16 >>>> inphy1: on miibus1 >>>> inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>> fxp2: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem >>>> 0xd0440000-0xd045ffff,0xd0461000-0xd0461fff irq 7 at device >> 19.0 on pci0 >>>> fxp2: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:8c:e4:f6 >>>> inphy2: on miibus2 >>>> inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>> pmtimer0 on isa0 >>>> fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq >>>> 2 on isa0 >>>> fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold >>>> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >>>> atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >>>> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >>>> sio0: type 16550A, console >>>> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >>>> BRIDGE 020214 loaded >>>> IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >>>> IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default =3D block all, >> Logging =3D enabled >>>> ad0: 3098MB [6296/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 >>>> acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 >>>> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c >>>> fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>> fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>> fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>> ata0: resetting devices .. done >>>> ------------- >>>> >>>> If you need more just ask for it. You don't need to be angry. Peace. >>>> >>> >>> OK, next question: >>> >>> ftp transfer like this uses large packets, rerun the test with ping -f >>> with different ping packet sizes, post the results. >>> >>> Remember, routers have to deal with many sized packets. >>> >>> Ted >>> >> >> Interesting. I have tested like you've said and I could ping >> with packet >> size 1450 bytes. Everything bigger is telling that "packet must be >> fragmented but DF is set up". This is of course pinging from winxp to >> server. > > That is normal since under winxp ping sets the DF bit I believe. > > The larger packets are not what matters, the smaller packets are more > interesting. I find it hard to believe your getting the same throughput > with > flood pinging with 56 byte packets. > > Ted > Here is the output: ------------- C:\Documents and Settings\nathsasa>ping -t -f -l 56 mig29 Preverjanje dosegljivosti mig29.workgroup [192.168.1.200] z 56 B podatk Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 Statistika preverjanja dosegljivosti za 192.168.1.200: Paketov: Poslanih =3D 46, Prejetih =3D 46, Izgubljenih =3D 0 (0% = izguba), Povpre=E8ni =E8as v milisekundah: Minimum =3D 0ms, Maksimum =3D 0ms, Povpre=E8je =3D 0ms ----------- It's in my native language but the position is the same as in english. --=20 Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 11:04:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFEB16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:04:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2706D43D55 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:04:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBIB42Bt078259; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:04:02 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43A5421C.9040100@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:03:56 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051204) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gustavo Parrini References: <43A4E20F.2050207@tdf.com.br> In-Reply-To: <43A4E20F.2050207@tdf.com.br> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1EFFCC152A1BB891F6F764CD" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:04:02 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1211/Fri Dec 16 22:51:35 2005 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to make init(8) run a daemon to me?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:04:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1EFFCC152A1BB891F6F764CD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gustavo Parrini wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm having a pretty hard time trying to figure out how > can I get init(8) to run a daemon and respawn it if it > crashes. By the time I was a Linux user, it was done by > adding a line in /etc/inittab and it was all... > > I know that it must be done in /etc/ttys but I couldn't > find any syntax example after searching the FreeBSD manpages, > maillists, Handbook and Google. > > "man init" gives me this: > > ... > The *init* utility can also be used to keep arbitrary daemons running, > automatically restarting them if they die. In this case, the first field > in the ttys(5) > > file must not reference the path to a configured device > node and will be passed to the daemon as the final argument on its com- > mand line. This is similar to the facility offered in the AT&T System V > UNIX //etc/inittab/. > ... > > Sounded a little cryptic to me... sorry... > > Can anyone help me? If so, An example line would be fine. Lets take sendmail as an example here -- just for something concrete to write about, and not because sendmail needs this sort of treatment. Now, you need 4 fields to go into the /etc/ttys file to make this work: name -- which terminal device to use getty -- the program to attach to that terminal type -- the terminal type status -- on or off (See the comments in the /etc/ttys file for more detail on this) So as an example /etc/ttys line try: sendmail "/usr/sbin/sendmail -L sm-mta -bB -q30m" network on The first field here is an arbitrary name -- anything will do so long as it doesn't collide with any of the terminal device names from /dev. The second field is the command and arguments to run, encased in "double quotes". Note the '-bB' flag -- that's important and tells sendmail to stay in the foreground. You definitely don't want '-bd' here. The third field -- terminal type -- is really irrelevant here, so just choose something vaguely appropriate. The fourth field tells init "yes, please do run the sendmail process". Your confusion stems from the fact that what you are doing is running a daemon process -- i.e. a process /without/ a controlling terminal -- from the configuration file for setting up the processes that manage terminals. Yes, it's a hack. The SysV-ish /etc/inittab mechanism has been better thought out in this regard. Note too that when we say 'daemon' we don't mean a process that forks itself on startup, which is part of the standard mechanism for a process to dissociate itself from any controlling terminal (see daemon(3)). All programs in the base system intended to run as daemons will do that, which makes them completely unsuitable for running through this mechanism -- you'll just end up with init(8) spinning madly as it continually tries to restart the process. You can only use the /etc/ttys trick with a program that stays in the foreground. Many system daemons have a debug mode which prevents them from doing the initial fork to dissociate themselves from the terminal. You might wish to investigate the sysutils/daemontools port, which is a set of programs developed by Dan Bernstein for doing (inter alia) pretty much exactly this job: http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig1EFFCC152A1BB891F6F764CD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDpUIi8Mjk52CukIwRAxPfAKCRNju3j497d8TRelnnk+mCMohd/QCeJTJG Sw94IW/nfsmmJjJn17bkC8A= =eaHu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1EFFCC152A1BB891F6F764CD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 11:08:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B14F16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:08:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th.linton@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6B043D58 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:08:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from th.linton@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so317706nfe for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:08:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Mh8wXJXDDav1GpapQUCMdRSr7bUWpONK7OcRBR9EuZiAIss+s1m0zLsyPtLllgGRwL+D1pzQSOTjUhRSDZHSqMP3hDtuo/6jNHOdnYV3Bh8hYw/sp8IWh9BsWh7ryk2KhoEToEhTTgefUAl73ojG1W3/ygGJoxERw3UUG91aFn8= Received: by 10.49.32.19 with SMTP id k19mr202140nfj; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:08:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.232.8 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:08:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:08:02 +0100 From: Thomas Linton To: Tsakhlai Baatar In-Reply-To: <20051212045143.71533.qmail@web30713.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051212045143.71533.qmail@web30713.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM xSeries 226 ips problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:08:05 -0000 You have a problem with the ServeRaid Driver. I'm not sure, which ServeRaid Adapter is integtrated on the systemboard of the x226. Have a look on the man page of the ips driver. Following ServeRaid Adapter should work: =B7 IBM ServeRAID 3H =B7 ServeRAID 4L/4M/4H =B7 ServeRAID Series 5 =B7 ServeRAID 6i/6M man page IPS(4): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dips&sektion=3D4&manpath=3DFreeBS= D+6.0-RELEASE On 12/12/05, Tsakhlai Baatar wrote: > i got a problem during boot of FreeBSD 6.0 Release on my new IBM @Ser= ver > xSeries 226. > there is something like "resetting ips driver it will take a 5 minute" > message occurs and system not continue to other process. > What is wrong with that. How do I install FreeBSD in this situation? > > > > > =09=09=09 > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Shopping > Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 11:13:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89BB16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:13:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (imap.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44B243D46 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBIBDmdZ078302; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:13:48 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43A54466.3060502@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:13:42 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051204) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sasa Stupar References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8AFB187156D7C4ADE27330A9" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:13:48 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1211/Fri Dec 16 22:51:35 2005 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Q ML Subject: Re: Long delay when sending mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:13:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8AFB187156D7C4ADE27330A9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sasa Stupar wrote: > Hi! > > I have configured mail server on FreeBSD 5.4 with sendmail 8.13.5 and > cyrus-imapd v2. I am also using client Mulberry (but also tested with > Tbird, Outlook Express, Outlook). I use IMAP access with all the > clients, the server is on the same network as clients (100 Mbit > network). The issue is when I try to send several messages one after > another I get smtp delay message and this sometimes takes for 30 sec to > a minute. My sendmail has configured a smart host and also to accept > unqualified domains. > I have attached my sendmail config. > What am I missing here? 30s delays sounds like DNS timeouts. Check that the host running sendmail can do a reverse lookup on the IP number of the clients connecting to it. Simply putting IPs and hostnames of all your client boxes into /etc/hosts should fix the problem. Alternatively, that delay could be due to the ident protocol. Ident is trivially easy to spoof which makes it a pointless waste of time. Putting: define(`confTO_IDENT', `0')dnl in your .mc file will stop ident getting in your hair. The third possibility is that you've got quite a few milters set up there and sendmail simply needs a bit of time to run each message through all of them. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig8AFB187156D7C4ADE27330A9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDpURs8Mjk52CukIwRA2jyAJ41jyTzNpO2u0ZCEpoBd3OAAnusJgCcClD2 ul5q1gXqXo5G23Vdve98yFk= =uuvG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8AFB187156D7C4ADE27330A9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 11:51:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E6316A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:51:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7BC43D45 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:51:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBIBsGP33858; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:54:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Sasa Stupar" , Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:51:00 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <41C483468621896258B324AD@[192.168.10.249]> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:51:32 -0000 what does the CPU of the router do when your doing that? Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:00 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >Song) > > > > >--On 18. december 2005 2:32 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt > >wrote: > >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM >>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>> Theme Song) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM >>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>> Theme Song) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM >>>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>>>> Theme Song) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ted >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and >>>>> without polling: >>>>>>> ************** >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with >>>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with >>>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec >>>>>>> *************** >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11). >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices >>>>>> in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in >>>>>> use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram >>>>>> of the setup, etc. etc. etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. >>>>>> Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact >>>>>> duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get identical >>>>>> results. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ted >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900 >>> and 3C905C >>>> >>>> The 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD the driver was >>>> written >>>> without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot of >hardware. I would >>>> say >>>> there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the >>>> ethernet. >>>> Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt. >>>> >>>>> NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel >>>>> Pro/100S Nics and >>>>> Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400 >>>>> with winxp >>>>> and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularly >>> steller combo, >>>> I would question that this system could saturate the >ethernet, either. >>>> >>>>> Diagram: >>>>> >>>>> dmesg from the router: >>>>> ---------------- >>>>> $ dmesg >>>>> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. >>>>> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, >>> 1992, 1993, 1994 >>>>> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >>>>> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #0: Wed Sep 7 13:49:09 CEST 2005 >>>>> root@fb411.neon1.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/M0N0WALL_GENERIC >>>>> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >>>>> CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (434.32-MHz 686-class CPU) >>>>> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 >>>>> >>>>> Features=0x183f9ff>>>> GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> >>>>> real memory = 201326592 (196608K bytes) >>>>> avail memory = 179142656 (174944K bytes) >>>>> Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc1006000. >>>>> Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot" at 0xc100609c. >>>>> Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled >>>>> md0: Preloaded image 11534336 bytes at 0xc0504d9c >>>>> md1: Malloc disk >>>>> Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdef0 >>>>> npx0: on motherboard >>>>> npx0: INT 16 interface >>>>> pcib0: on motherboard >>>>> pci0: on pcib0 >>>>> pcib1: at device >>>>> 1.0 on pci0 >>>>> pci1: on pcib1 >>>>> isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >>>>> isa0: on isab0 >>>>> atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at >>>>> device 7.1 on >>>>> pci0 >>>>> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 >>>>> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 >>>>> uhci0: port >>>>> 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 >>>>> at device 7.2 on pci0 >>>>> usb0: on uhci0 >>>>> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >>>>> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>>>> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >>>>> chip1: port >>>>> 0x5000-0x500f at >>>>> device 7.3 on pci0 >>>>> pci0: (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371) at 8.0 irq 11 >>>>> fxp0: port 0xd800-0xd83f mem >>>>> 0xd0400000-0xd041ffff,0xd0460000-0xd0460fff irq 10 at device >>>>> 15.0 on pci0 >>>>> fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:62:f6:06 >>>>> inphy0: on miibus0 >>>>> inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>> fxp1: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem >>>>> 0xd0420000-0xd043ffff,0xd0462000-0xd0462fff irq 12 at device >>>>> 16.0 on pci0 >>>>> fxp1: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:9c:2a:16 >>>>> inphy1: on miibus1 >>>>> inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>> fxp2: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem >>>>> 0xd0440000-0xd045ffff,0xd0461000-0xd0461fff irq 7 at device >>> 19.0 on pci0 >>>>> fxp2: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:8c:e4:f6 >>>>> inphy2: on miibus2 >>>>> inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>> pmtimer0 on isa0 >>>>> fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq >>>>> 2 on isa0 >>>>> fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold >>>>> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >>>>> atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >>>>> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >>>>> sio0: type 16550A, console >>>>> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >>>>> BRIDGE 020214 loaded >>>>> IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >>>>> IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default = block all, >>> Logging = enabled >>>>> ad0: 3098MB [6296/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 >>>>> acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 >>>>> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c >>>>> fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>> fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>> fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>> ata0: resetting devices .. done >>>>> ------------- >>>>> >>>>> If you need more just ask for it. You don't need to be >angry. Peace. >>>>> >>>> >>>> OK, next question: >>>> >>>> ftp transfer like this uses large packets, rerun the test >with ping -f >>>> with different ping packet sizes, post the results. >>>> >>>> Remember, routers have to deal with many sized packets. >>>> >>>> Ted >>>> >>> >>> Interesting. I have tested like you've said and I could ping >>> with packet >>> size 1450 bytes. Everything bigger is telling that "packet must be >>> fragmented but DF is set up". This is of course pinging from winxp to >>> server. >> >> That is normal since under winxp ping sets the DF bit I believe. >> >> The larger packets are not what matters, the smaller packets are more >> interesting. I find it hard to believe your getting the same >throughput >> with >> flood pinging with 56 byte packets. >> >> Ted >> > >Here is the output: >------------- >C:\Documents and Settings\nathsasa>ping -t -f -l 56 mig29 > >Preverjanje dosegljivosti mig29.workgroup [192.168.1.200] z 56 B podatk > >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 > >Statistika preverjanja dosegljivosti za 192.168.1.200: > Paketov: Poslanih = 46, Prejetih = 46, Izgubljenih = 0 (0% izguba), >Povpreèni èas v milisekundah: > Minimum = 0ms, Maksimum = 0ms, Povpreèje = 0ms >----------- > >It's in my native language but the position is the same as in english. > >-- >Sasa Stupar >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: >12/16/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 11:55:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B32E16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:55:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394DB43D5D for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:55:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB88210190 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:55:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19125-01-3 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:55:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5166E21017F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:55:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBIBtixf081726 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:55:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:55:45 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <200512180400.jBI40PBk009115@clunix.cl.msu.edu> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20051216214326.03bf2c18@face2interface.com> <200512180400.jBI40PBk009115@clunix.cl.msu.edu> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051218064953.2EC9.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: how to dual boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:55:54 -0000 On Saturday, December 17, 2005 11:00:25 PM Jerry McAllister Subject: Re: how to dual boot Wrote these words of wisdom: > > At 07:39 PM 12/16/2005, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > >You need to read the documentation better. > > > > Or at all. :) Was hoping it would just magically guide me through it. Not > > a critical box of mine of course. > > > > >It tells you that you should install Microsloth first and then FreeBSD. > > > > Did that, lost MS so reinstalled it. > > > > >But, FreeBSD is more sophisticated and also more friendly to the rest > > >of the world and, first of all, asks if you want an MBR installed in > > >the sector 0 and then if you go ahead and write FreeBSD's MBR, it will > > >give you a choice of bootable slices to boot, including MS if present. > > > > Ok, I'll read the docs and reinstall FBSD. That's no problem, I hope. > > > > Here is the problem. This is my kids' computer and they insist on > > installing XP. So we keep doing 30 day trials. On the bright side they've > > all learned to install the OS. Sounds like I'll have problems though > > keeping a FreeBSD install on there if Windows has to be reinstalled every > > 30 days. > > Oh well, such is life in the fast lane. > Have fun. > > ////jerry > > > Yuck. > > > > Marty > > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: Why do you have to reinstall Microsoft every thirty day? I am not familiar with this trial scenario you mentioned. Do you have some pirated copy of the software and are attempting to defeat the required registration of it? I am just curious, that is all. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net Buffet is a French term, It means "get up and get it yourself." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 12:20:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A0716A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:20:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@ch.easynet.net) Received: from mx2.mail.ch.easynet.net (mx2.mail.ch.easynet.net [217.8.192.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476C343D5C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:20:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@ch.easynet.net) Received: (qmail 56474 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2005 12:10:37 -0000 Received: from staff-gw.ch.easynet.net (HELO ?10.0.1.5?) (217.8.192.5) by mx2.mail.ch.easynet.net with SMTP; 18 Dec 2005 12:10:37 -0000 Message-ID: <43A55491.7010609@ch.easynet.net> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:22:41 +0100 From: Richard Klingler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: bootloader not reading kernel.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:20:55 -0000 Hello... Does someone know what to do that the bootloader reads in /boot/kernel.conf? Otherwise have to do to always a "boot -c" and issue "di psm0" and "q"... thanx inadvance rick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 12:21:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D930816A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@uclinux.net) Received: from marvin.klingler.net (marvin.klingler.net [217.8.193.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AB143D5C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:21:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@uclinux.net) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (staff-gw.ch.easynet.net [217.8.192.5]) by marvin.klingler.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231326134 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:21:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43A554AE.7070304@uclinux.net> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:23:10 +0100 From: Richard Klingler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: bootloader not reading kernel.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:21:23 -0000 Hello... Does someone know what to do that the bootloader reads in /boot/kernel.conf? Otherwise have to do to always a "boot -c" and issue "di psm0" and "q"... thanx inadvance rick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 12:47:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCECE16A432 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:47:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de (natsmtp00.rzone.de [81.169.145.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B0D43D9E for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:46:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from athena.laverenz.de (p5480B104.dip.t-dialin.net [84.128.177.4]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBICkoMe025601 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:46:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E6EE395E3E for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:46:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08024-01 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:46:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id DAB19E395E3B; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:46:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:46:48 +0100 From: Uwe Laverenz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051218124648.GE7262@laverenz.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051218000403.GB7506@securityfocus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051218000403.GB7506@securityfocus.com> Organization: private site Sender: uwe@laverenz.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at laverenz.de Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6, WPA-PSK, wpa_supplicant and a IBM a31p X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:47:45 -0000 On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 05:04:03PM -0700, Daniel Hanson wrote: > Thoughts, ideas? directions. From my reading of the man pages, ap_scan Yes, probably WPA-encryption is simply not supported by your wireless card/chipset. AFAIK there is no way to use WPA with a wi-card. You either stick to WEP-encryption or buy a newer wireless card (ath or iwi would do WPA-PSK). Uwe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 13:43:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D170716A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:43:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmiuser@m-net.arbornet.org) Received: from arbornet.org (m-net.arbornet.org [64.9.205.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE1843D46 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:42:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmiuser@m-net.arbornet.org) Received: from m-net.arbornet.org (wmiuser@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arbornet.org (8.12.3p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id jBIDgvem024285; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:42:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wmiuser@m-net.arbornet.org) Received: (from wmiuser@localhost) by m-net.arbornet.org (8.12.3p2/8.12.3/Submit) id jBIDgvf7024277; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:42:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:42:56 -0500 From: Wolfgang Lausenbart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051218084256.A21266@m-net.arbornet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Cc: garbeam@wmii.de Subject: setting sysctl net.inet6.ip6.fw.deny.unknown.extension.headers off crashes R51 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:43:03 -0000 Hello List, Now using FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE. If I disable net.inet6.ip6.fw.deny_unknown_exthdrs, then Thinkpad R51 crashes. Has this been fixed in HEAD? using standard "ip6fw allow from any to any" rules... kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 16 0xc0400000 462e4c kernel 2 1 0xc0863000 1bd9cc w22n50_sys.ko 3 1 0xc0a21000 590d0 acpi.ko 4 1 0xc26f2000 3000 fdescfs.ko 5 1 0xc26fe000 6000 linprocfs.ko 6 1 0xc2751000 15000 linux.ko 7 1 0xc28a2000 3000 snp.ko 8 1 0xc2b4a000 5000 ip6fw.ko Routing tables Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%em0/64 link#1 UC em0 fe80::211:25ff:fe82:95b5%em0 00:11:25:82:95:b5 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#4 UHL lo0 fe80::%vlan1/64 link#6 UC vlan1 fe80::211:25ff:fe82:95b5%vlan1 00:11:25:82:95:b5 UHL lo0 fe80::%vlan2/64 link#7 UC vlan2 fe80::211:25ff:fe82:95b5%vlan2 00:11:25:82:95:b5 UHL lo0 fe80::%vlan3/64 link#8 UC vlan3 fe80::211:25ff:fe82:95b5%vlan3 00:11:25:82:95:b5 UHL lo0 fe80::%vlan4/64 link#9 UC vlan4 fe80::211:25ff:fe82:95b5%vlan4 00:11:25:82:95:b5 UHL lo0 fe80::%vlan5/64 link#10 UC vlan5 fe80::211:25ff:fe82:95b5%vlan5 00:11:25:82:95:b5 UHL lo0 fe80::%wo0/64 link#14 UC wo0 fe80::209:5bff:fe54:82a5%wo0 00:09:5b:54:82:a5 UHL lo0 ff01:1::/32 link#1 UC em0 ff01:4::/32 ::1 UC lo0 ff01:6::/32 link#6 UC vlan1 ff01:7::/32 link#7 UC vlan2 ff01:8::/32 link#8 UC vlan3 ff01:9::/32 link#9 UC vlan4 ff01:a::/32 link#10 UC vlan5 ff01:e::/32 link#14 UC wo0 ff02::%em0/32 link#1 UC em0 ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0 ff02::%vlan1/32 link#6 UC vlan1 ff02::%vlan2/32 link#7 UC vlan2 ff02::%vlan3/32 link#8 UC vlan3 ff02::%vlan4/32 link#9 UC vlan4 ff02::%vlan5/32 link#10 UC vlan5 ff02::%wo0/32 link#14 UC wo0 Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire 104 link#14 UC 0 0 wo0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 2 lo0 wo0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 104.129.0.63 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 104.255.255.255 inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe54:82a5%wo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xe ether 00:09:5b:54:82:a5 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps status: associated ssid olsr.freifunk.net channel 10 bssid 02:09:0b:66:82:a5 stationname foobar-e0 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100 bintval 100 net.wlan.debug had before set been to 1 then this causes the os to freeze: sysctl net.inet6.ip6.fw.deny_unknown_exthdrs1->0 any ideas? ip6fw show 00100 407 10596 allow ipv6 from any to any 00200 0 0 allow log ipv6 from any to any 65535 43 1068 deny ipv6 from any to any greetz Wolfgang Lausenbart -- E7AC 1E9B 87D8 5BD2 E2F2 6F4A 3177 ED68 8185 480C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 14:03:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8564716A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:03:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Levitch@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2FF43D49 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:03:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Levitch@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jBIE30Ka000602 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.255.255.73] (loudsl01.4.0.6.185.c.iglou.com [64.253.111.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jBIE2xpl000480 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:03:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43A56C13.7030900@mac.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:02:59 -0500 From: Darrel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051214) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Sawmill X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:03:01 -0000 I have not been abled to spend much time with any mailing lists recently, but think that noone answered my question from a couple of months ago. This might be of interest to someone: The precompiled binaries of Sawmill did not work on FreeBSD 6, but the encrypted source code did. Sawmill does not support Konqueror, but the graphical interface opened in Firefox. Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 14:04:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD71416A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:04:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Levitch@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D748D43D49 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:04:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Levitch@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin04-en2 [10.13.10.149]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jBIE4Xlh005013 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.255.255.73] (loudsl01.4.0.6.185.c.iglou.com [64.253.111.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin04/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jBIE4Vsv021277 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:04:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43A56C6F.5020901@mac.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:04:31 -0500 From: Darrel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051214) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: wireless server | AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:04:51 -0000 I had no interest in wireless networking until recently. Google searches turned up some interesting information, but most of it was specific to Linux. Also, I did not have much luck figuring out which chipsets were on the wireless cards. Does someone have a suggestion of which card to get for making a FreeBSD 6 wireless server on AMD64? Thanks, Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 14:37:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05E216A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:37:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xmisoy@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920F243D5F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xmisoy@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so747572wxc for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:37:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=fa4cbz0+Wl4+p997X/kKx8m/HRa+y5jb3i65gYm3/yAhyG7d67C5RgGkz0Jnb2pQU5VuU/5IWeODvmXaGC4Q5yXAiFAYKwTFzfvAd3Nfs4+KWUKAc+dxZ9xOaA9Zr3rQ7ldpYDs6vdYCnFAJGYgedG5nkXM3breW4LcnY3RF1+E= Received: by 10.70.110.13 with SMTP id i13mr3377875wxc; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.54.9 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:37:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <36f5bbba0512180637h1da3dc78qab0d9c1ad0b018f5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:37:34 -0800 From: "Edwin D. Vinas" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD/Apache/DNS- Problem accessing virtual hosts from external network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:37:36 -0000 Hi, I am using DNS(Bind)/Apache(virtual hosting) in a FreeBSd machine which is connected via a static IP in a DSL provider. I want to setup mulitple websites under my domain. I have been able to get a domain from GoDaddy and was able to setup so that it will point to my IP address when my domain is accessed. I also have configured DNS and Apache virtual hosting. Questions: 1) Is it a problem of DNS, Apache virtual hosting or my domain name provider? 2) Is anyone have tried to configure multiple virtual hosting in Apache wit= h DNS in one FreeBSD machine? Can you give me your sample config for DNS, Apache, /etc/hosts/, /etc/resolv.conf etc etc that are related to this setup? ----------------------------------- Observations: 1) If the computer accessing the virtual domains is from the LAN, it works fine. I can access all the virtual domains (i.e., www.mydomain.com, vhost1.mydomain.com, vhost2.mydomain.com, vhost3.mydomain.com) 2) But if the virtual domain was accessed from outside (Internet or at my office), it doesn't work and all virtual domains resolve to www.mydomain.com. All I can see is the main default page for www.mydomain.com. For example, when I access www.mydomain.com, it works fine. But when I access the virtual hosts such as vhost1.mydomain.com, vhost2.mydomain.com, vhost3.mydomain.com; it only display the main website www.mydomain.com. Here are my configurations: ---- * httpd.conf & virtual hosts #-- Listen 80 BindAddress 203.xxx.xxx.xxx Port 80 #ServerName www.mydomain.com (commented it out but doesn't have any effect when uncommented) DocumentRoot "/usr/local/apache/www" NameVirtualHost 203.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 ServerAdmin mymail@gmail.com DocumentRoot /usr/local/apache/www/ ServerName www.mydomain.com ErrorLog logs/virtual_host.www.com-error_log CustomLog logs/virtual_host.www.com-access_log common ServerAdmin mymail@gmail.com ServerName vhost1.mydomain.com DocumentRoot /usr/local/apache/www_virtual/vhost1/ ErrorLog logs/virtual_host.vhost1.com-error_log CustomLog logs/virtual_host.vhost1.com-access_log common ServerAdmin mymail@gmail.com ServerName vhost2.mydomain.com DocumentRoot /usr/local/apache/www_virtual/vhost2/ ErrorLog logs/virtual_host.vhost2.com-error_log CustomLog logs/virtual_host.vhost2.com-access_log common #--- * DNS configs #--- ; Machine Names localhost IN A 127.0.0.1 dns IN A 203.xxx.xxx.xxx @ IN A 203.xxx.xxx.xxx ; Aliases www IN CNAME @ vhost1 IN CNAME @ vhost2 IN CNAME @ vhost3 IN CNAME @ vhost4 IN CNAME @ #--- * Traceroutes from external network I can traceroute www.mydomain.com and resolves to 203.xxx.xxx.xxx I can also traceroute vhost1.mydomain.com and resolves to 203.xxx.xxx.xxx I can also traceroute all vhosts and they find my IP address 203.xxx.xxx.xx= x . * GoDaddy COnfig - I have set Custom Name Servers and added my IP address/hostname as the DN= S server Thanks! Edwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 14:57:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB92816A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:57:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs3.arnes.si (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AC343D53 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:57:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EF81D7CD1; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:57:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs3.arnes.si ([193.2.1.68]) by localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39584-05; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:57:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94051D7CE8; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:57:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] ([192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBIE70D1012201; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:07:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:07:09 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: Ted Mittelstaedt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <498C0455BE5AC9573152FE62@[192.168.10.249]> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Cc: Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:57:18 -0000 Nothing. From the GUI view it is at 0% of utilisation. Sasa --On 18. december 2005 3:51 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt =20 wrote: > > what does the CPU of the router do when your doing that? > > Ted > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:00 AM >> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >> Song) >> >> >> >> >> --On 18. december 2005 2:32 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >>>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM >>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>> Theme Song) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM >>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>>> Theme Song) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM >>>>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>>>>> Theme Song) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ted >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and >>>>>> without polling: >>>>>>>> ************** >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with >>>>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with >>>>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec >>>>>>>> *************** >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices >>>>>>> in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in >>>>>>> use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram >>>>>>> of the setup, etc. etc. etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. >>>>>>> Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact >>>>>>> duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get identical >>>>>>> results. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ted >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> OK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900 >>>> and 3C905C >>>>> >>>>> The 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD the driver was >>>>> written >>>>> without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot of >> hardware. I would >>>>> say >>>>> there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the >>>>> ethernet. >>>>> Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt. >>>>> >>>>>> NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel >>>>>> Pro/100S Nics and >>>>>> Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400 >>>>>> with winxp >>>>>> and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularly >>>> steller combo, >>>>> I would question that this system could saturate the >> ethernet, either. >>>>> >>>>>> Diagram: >>>>>> >>>>>> dmesg from the router: >>>>>> ---------------- >>>>>> $ dmesg >>>>>> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. >>>>>> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, >>>> 1992, 1993, 1994 >>>>>> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >>>>>> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #0: Wed Sep 7 13:49:09 CEST 2005 >>>>>> root@fb411.neon1.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/M0N0WALL_GENERIC >>>>>> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >>>>>> CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (434.32-MHz 686-class CPU) >>>>>> Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0x665 Stepping =3D 5 >>>>>> >>>>>> Features=3D0x183f9ff>>>>> GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> >>>>>> real memory =3D 201326592 (196608K bytes) >>>>>> avail memory =3D 179142656 (174944K bytes) >>>>>> Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc1006000. >>>>>> Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot" at 0xc100609c. >>>>>> Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled >>>>>> md0: Preloaded image 11534336 bytes at 0xc0504d9c >>>>>> md1: Malloc disk >>>>>> Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdef0 >>>>>> npx0: on motherboard >>>>>> npx0: INT 16 interface >>>>>> pcib0: on motherboard >>>>>> pci0: on pcib0 >>>>>> pcib1: at device >>>>>> 1.0 on pci0 >>>>>> pci1: on pcib1 >>>>>> isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >>>>>> isa0: on isab0 >>>>>> atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at >>>>>> device 7.1 on >>>>>> pci0 >>>>>> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 >>>>>> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 >>>>>> uhci0: port >>>>>> 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 >>>>>> at device 7.2 on pci0 >>>>>> usb0: on uhci0 >>>>>> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >>>>>> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>>>>> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >>>>>> chip1: port >>>>>> 0x5000-0x500f at >>>>>> device 7.3 on pci0 >>>>>> pci0: (vendor=3D0x1274, dev=3D0x1371) at 8.0 irq 11 >>>>>> fxp0: port 0xd800-0xd83f mem >>>>>> 0xd0400000-0xd041ffff,0xd0460000-0xd0460fff irq 10 at device >>>>>> 15.0 on pci0 >>>>>> fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:62:f6:06 >>>>>> inphy0: on miibus0 >>>>>> inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>>> fxp1: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem >>>>>> 0xd0420000-0xd043ffff,0xd0462000-0xd0462fff irq 12 at device >>>>>> 16.0 on pci0 >>>>>> fxp1: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:9c:2a:16 >>>>>> inphy1: on miibus1 >>>>>> inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>>> fxp2: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem >>>>>> 0xd0440000-0xd045ffff,0xd0461000-0xd0461fff irq 7 at device >>>> 19.0 on pci0 >>>>>> fxp2: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:8c:e4:f6 >>>>>> inphy2: on miibus2 >>>>>> inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>>> pmtimer0 on isa0 >>>>>> fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq >>>>>> 2 on isa0 >>>>>> fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold >>>>>> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >>>>>> atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >>>>>> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >>>>>> sio0: type 16550A, console >>>>>> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >>>>>> BRIDGE 020214 loaded >>>>>> IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >>>>>> IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default =3D block all, >>>> Logging =3D enabled >>>>>> ad0: 3098MB [6296/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 >>>>>> acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 >>>>>> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c >>>>>> fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>>> fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>>> fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>>> ata0: resetting devices .. done >>>>>> ------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> If you need more just ask for it. You don't need to be >> angry. Peace. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OK, next question: >>>>> >>>>> ftp transfer like this uses large packets, rerun the test >> with ping -f >>>>> with different ping packet sizes, post the results. >>>>> >>>>> Remember, routers have to deal with many sized packets. >>>>> >>>>> Ted >>>>> >>>> >>>> Interesting. I have tested like you've said and I could ping >>>> with packet >>>> size 1450 bytes. Everything bigger is telling that "packet must be >>>> fragmented but DF is set up". This is of course pinging from winxp to >>>> server. >>> >>> That is normal since under winxp ping sets the DF bit I believe. >>> >>> The larger packets are not what matters, the smaller packets are more >>> interesting. I find it hard to believe your getting the same >> throughput >>> with >>> flood pinging with 56 byte packets. >>> >>> Ted >>> >> >> Here is the output: >> ------------- >> C:\Documents and Settings\nathsasa>ping -t -f -l 56 mig29 >> >> Preverjanje dosegljivosti mig29.workgroup [192.168.1.200] z 56 B podatk >> >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=3D56 =E8as < 1 ms TTL=3D63 >> >> Statistika preverjanja dosegljivosti za 192.168.1.200: >> Paketov: Poslanih =3D 46, Prejetih =3D 46, Izgubljenih =3D 0 (0% = izguba), >> Povpre=E8ni =E8as v milisekundah: >> Minimum =3D 0ms, Maksimum =3D 0ms, Povpre=E8je =3D 0ms >> ----------- >> >> It's in my native language but the position is the same as in english. >> >> -- >> Sasa Stupar >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: >> 12/16/2005 >> > --=20 Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 15:15:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8227F16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:15:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven.lake@voyager.net) Received: from mail1.mx.voyager.net (mail1.mx.voyager.net [216.93.66.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D4E43D60 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:15:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven.lake@voyager.net) Received: from dhcp-2-39.lnng.corp.core.com (brick.voyager.net [209.153.128.248]) by mail1.mx.voyager.net (8.13.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id jBIFFBqR097278 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:15:11 -0500 (EST) From: Steven Lake To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:15:18 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512181015.18357.steven.lake@voyager.net> Cc: Subject: Printing problems with Mozilla and Firefox on Freebsd 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:15:12 -0000 Ok, got a weird one here. Got cups setup with our new office lan printer and I can print just fine from any program, EXCEPT Mozilla and Firefox. They go through the motions, but nothing happens. Nothing shows up in the que or the access or error logs or anything. Am I missing something? My research via google into this found me several pages that mentioned something about 'msttcorefonts', but after some playing with this they don't seem to be installable on freebsd. Any suggestions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 15:32:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945F916A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:32:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from winter_kf@yahoo.com) Received: from web35401.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web35401.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CF0E43D77 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:32:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from winter_kf@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 75658 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Dec 2005 15:32:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=J2SEz6X3UmCM4mCMUxedrnYO6Bzch6IdBtFoa5x+o3k3GwhvkHnxYThYxpDedAVqO1RoeDp1VWbWLnqa/fdXySoO+szBzDCdICJgwSb7+5xd+bmpsIprWmieS6XM0yFmTQ/DI9XbaNOs5vx39QK5adFDtCbmD4FG/ydv3/HBqdI= ; Message-ID: <20051218153203.75656.qmail@web35401.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.92.154.37] by web35401.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:32:03 PST Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:32:03 -0800 (PST) From: winter kf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: sony erricson pccard on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:32:11 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to get the sony erricson GC85 pccard with GPRS/EDGE connection working on my Toshiba Satelite M40 Laptop. I manage to get it worked in SUSE Linux 10.0 but not in FreeBSD 5.4 (no idea how to start). I've been searching for documentation on the internet but those are either too specific/ not very helpful (tried various recommendations; nothing worked). Is anyone get this card working? kindly please provide some hints/ guidance. Thank You Very Much. rgds, winter p/s some data about my laptop Toshiba Satelite M40, Pentium M 1.6GHz, 1GHz DDR SDRAM tribooting: Windows XP Home, SUSE Linux 10.0, FreeBSD 5.4- release Sony Erricson GC85 Type II pccard connection: GPRS/ EDGE from dmesg, pccard detected (I think :-) as: pccard0 on cbb0 cbb0 bad vcc request status 0xffffffff cbb-power: 0V another occurence(sorry can't remember very well the actual messages) : sio0 (blah.....) . . . . sio1 at port..... sio1: type 16550A __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 16:18:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33F916A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:18:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from notebook@tdf.com.br) Received: from ns1.tdf.com.br (ns1.tdf.com.br [200.223.219.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E7243D62 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:18:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from notebook@tdf.com.br) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by injector.tdf.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430E011D6CC for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:19:09 -0300 (BRT) Received: by ns1.tdf.com.br (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B2A5211D499; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:19:06 -0300 (BRT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.tdf.com.br X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 Received: from [172.22.0.98] (220011.tdf.com.br [200.223.220.11]) by ns1.tdf.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E7311D499 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:19:05 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <43A58BDE.50500@tdf.com.br> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:18:38 -0300 From: Gustavo Parrini User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: AntiVirus - TDF Provider Subject: Re: How to make init(8) run a daemon to me?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:18:45 -0000 Man! I couldn't ask for better answers to my question. Big thanks to Björn König and Mathew Seaman. It worked like a charm. Gustavo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 16:30:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A0116A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:30:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06A043D49 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:30:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1013945nzo for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:30:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=C0Z2WXDtBRQ13I2I0tS9/yJ3NOSeAJ7p/n5+m5V2TUR4mJczCKBMYBaxwOmYiS9Z19+0QcDRe2IkrFe+NvgIFhrm8sp5MeULwZuPsAfL8sB6icvg95qbg+72xpmFgbYcoCJ8gT9FUn4b8yVqFw6/KFGPltqWZ2snO2z8IUMr6WY= Received: by 10.36.2.10 with SMTP id 10mr4890995nzb; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:30:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:30:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:30:22 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Steven Lake In-Reply-To: <200512181015.18357.steven.lake@voyager.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200512181015.18357.steven.lake@voyager.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing problems with Mozilla and Firefox on Freebsd 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:30:24 -0000 On 12/18/05, Steven Lake wrote: > Ok, got a weird one here. Got cups setup with our > new office lan printer and I can print just fine from any > program, EXCEPT Mozilla and Firefox. They go through > the motions, but nothing happens. Nothing shows up in > the que or the access or error logs or anything. Am I > missing something? My research via google into this > found me several pages that mentioned something about > 'msttcorefonts', but after some playing with this they don't > seem to be installable on freebsd. Any suggestions? I think x11-fonts/webfonts may be referenced as msttcorefonts in other distributions. I can't explain why, but try to install the print/gtklp port and change the print command in firefox to gtklp. Try to format your e-mail, too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 16:34:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69C316A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:34:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F54343D5C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:34:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1014410nzo for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:34:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=igYJCISDOFsBQHihj8BJ8GYtJ0lSxLhyFHdjcc6LgPRZlLr3jeylMsAQ5FIjELhBUevAmMF33GsYlagS+ChUrFpurig0TVTXs2v3O7XEvxwvl8hjJV+mOkXcaeToNMgJ0aaj3tgHaCkURoCsqhRdpSA+WJv8kpDl57BlduAS/0k= Received: by 10.37.2.15 with SMTP id e15mr4944272nzi; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:34:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:34:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:34:01 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Richard Klingler In-Reply-To: <43A554AE.7070304@uclinux.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43A554AE.7070304@uclinux.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bootloader not reading kernel.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:34:02 -0000 On 12/18/05, Richard Klingler wrote: > Hello... > > Does someone know what to do that the bootloader reads in > /boot/kernel.conf? > > Otherwise have to do to always a "boot -c" and issue > "di psm0" and "q"... > > > thanx inadvance > rick > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > loader.conf is probably the file to do such customization in. Have a look at its manpage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 17:11:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBE316A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:11:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven.lake@corecomm.com) Received: from mail2.mx.voyager.net (mail2.mx.voyager.net [216.93.66.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C160543D62 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:11:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven.lake@corecomm.com) Received: from dragon.corecomm.com (brick.voyager.net [209.153.128.248]) by mail2.mx.voyager.net (8.13.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id jBIHB8in072694; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:11:08 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20051218120850.00bf96f0@pop.voyager.net> X-Sender: steven.lake@pop.voyager.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:11:12 -0500 To: "Andrew P." From: Steven Lake In-Reply-To: References: <200512181015.18357.steven.lake@voyager.net> <200512181015.18357.steven.lake@voyager.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0550-4, 12/16/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing problems with Mozilla and Firefox on Freebsd 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:11:09 -0000 At 07:30 PM 12/18/2005 +0300, Andrew P. wrote: >On 12/18/05, Steven Lake wrote: > > Ok, got a weird one here. Got cups setup with our > > new office lan printer and I can print just fine from any > > program, EXCEPT Mozilla and Firefox. They go through > > the motions, but nothing happens. Nothing shows up in > > the que or the access or error logs or anything. Am I > > missing something? My research via google into this > > found me several pages that mentioned something about > > 'msttcorefonts', but after some playing with this they don't > > seem to be installable on freebsd. Any suggestions? > >I think x11-fonts/webfonts may be referenced as msttcorefonts >in other distributions. I can't explain why, but try to install the >print/gtklp port and change the print command in firefox to >gtklp. Installed webfonts and gtklp and restarted x and no go still. :( One thing I did notice is that all the others go to a normal print window, but the two browsers go to some custom printing screen and say something about "postscript/printer_name" instead of the normal KDE cups installed printer. Would that possibly cause part of the issue? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 17:25:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F41C16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:25:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lk@tempest.sk) Received: from mailgw.dgrp.sk (mailgw.dgrp.sk [195.28.127.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DED43D62 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:25:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lk@tempest.sk) Received: by mailgw.dgrp.sk (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 569F334A5A6; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:25:05 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on mailgw.dgrp.sk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from webmail.tempest.sk (domino1.tempest.sk [195.28.100.38]) by mailgw.dgrp.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F2B34A5A2 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:24:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from lk.tempest.sk ([195.28.109.47]) by webmail.tempest.sk (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.4) with ESMTP id 2005121818245378-8275 ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:24:53 +0100 Received: from lk.tempest.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lk.tempest.sk (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBIHOm1E077544 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:24:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lk@lk.tempest.sk) Received: (from koren@localhost) by lk.tempest.sk (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jBIHOmNv077541; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:24:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lk) X-Authentication-Warning: lk.tempest.sk: koren set sender to lk using -f Sender: lk@tempest.sk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ludo Koren Date: 18 Dec 2005 18:24:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87acey71y7.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> Lines: 90 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Domino1/DGRP(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 18.12.2005 18:24:54, Serialize by Router on Domino1/DGRP(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 18.12.2005 18:24:58, Serialize complete at 18.12.2005 18:24:58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: gvinum: adding plex and subdisks to existing volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:25:09 -0000 Hi, I'm using 5.4-STABLE. One of the mirrored disks died. I want to add new disk, which has not the same size as the died one. The output of the gvinum l is the following: # gvinum l 4 drives: D rd2 State: up /dev/da2s1h A: 0/1023 MB (0%) D d2 State: up /dev/da2s1f A: 0/15452 MB (0%) D d3 State: up /dev/da3s1 A: 0/70001 MB (0%) D d4 State: up /dev/da1s1 A: 0/70001 MB (0%) 2 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 1023 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 83 GB 4 plexes: P usr.p0 C State: down Subdisks: 1 Size: 68 GB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 83 GB P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1023 MB P root.p0 C State: down Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B 6 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: down D: d1 Size: 15 GB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: d2 Size: 15 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: rd2 Size: 1023 MB S root.p0.s0 State: down D: rd1 Size: 1023 MB S usr.p0.s1 State: up D: d3 Size: 68 GB S usr.p1.s1 State: up D: d4 Size: 68 GB and # camcontrol devlist -v scbus0 on ahd0 bus 0: at scbus0 target 3 lun 0 (pass0,da0) at scbus0 target 9 lun 0 (pass1,da1) at scbus0 target 10 lun 0 (sa0,pass2) < > at scbus0 target -1 lun -1 () scbus1 on ahd1 bus 0: at scbus1 target 1 lun 0 (pass3,da2) at scbus1 target 8 lun 0 (pass4,da3) < > at scbus1 target -1 lun -1 () scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0: < > at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0) I want to have the whole new disk a one vinum slice so the # disklabel da0s1 # /dev/da0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 143363700 281 4.2BSD 0 0 0 c: 143363997 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit h: 143363981 16 vinum The old one was: # disklabel da2s1 # /dev/da2s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 2096855 281 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 b: 2097152 2097152 swap c: 35840952 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit f: 31646648 4194304 vinum h: 2097136 16 vinum When I try to do: # gvinum create gvinum.conf it ends up in immediate panic (page fault). The gvinum.conf file: drive d1b device /dev/da0s1h plex name usr.p2 org concat vol usr plex name root.p2 org concat vol root sd name root.p2.s0 drive d1b len 2096871s driveoffset 265s plex root.p2 plexoffset 0s sd name usr.p2.s0 drive d1b len 31646383s driveoffset 2097136s plex usr.p2 plexoffset 0s Am I doing something wrong? How can be added a new disk to existing mirror in gvinum? Any help appreciated, I cannot find useful hints. Regards, lk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 18:58:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE43216A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:58:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E430843DB5 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:58:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 16786 invoked by uid 502); 18 Dec 2005 18:58:11 -0000 Received: from dsl28163.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.163) by 0 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2005 18:58:11 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.163 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28163.ywave.com Message-ID: <43A5B143.30102@ywave.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:58:11 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051204) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Lake References: <200512181015.18357.steven.lake@voyager.net> <200512181015.18357.steven.lake@voyager.net> <5.2.0.9.2.20051218120850.00bf96f0@pop.voyager.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20051218120850.00bf96f0@pop.voyager.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing problems with Mozilla and Firefox on Freebsd 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:58:32 -0000 Steven Lake wrote: > At 07:30 PM 12/18/2005 +0300, Andrew P. wrote: > >> On 12/18/05, Steven Lake wrote: >> > Ok, got a weird one here. Got cups setup with our >> > new office lan printer and I can print just fine from any >> > program, EXCEPT Mozilla and Firefox. They go through >> > the motions, but nothing happens. Nothing shows up in >> > the que or the access or error logs or anything. Am I >> > missing something? My research via google into this >> > found me several pages that mentioned something about >> > 'msttcorefonts', but after some playing with this they don't >> > seem to be installable on freebsd. Any suggestions? >> >> I think x11-fonts/webfonts may be referenced as msttcorefonts >> in other distributions. I can't explain why, but try to install the >> print/gtklp port and change the print command in firefox to >> gtklp. > > > Installed webfonts and gtklp and restarted x and no go still. > :( One thing I did notice is that all the others go to a normal print > window, but the two browsers go to some custom printing screen and say > something about "postscript/printer_name" instead of the normal KDE cups > installed printer. Would that possibly cause part of the issue? Firefox isn't a KDE app, so by default is uses /usr/bin/lpr unless you specifically set it to use another print interface. Unfortunately Firefox 1.5's whole printing system is pretty buggy right now - almost to the point of unusability on my system. If it was working properly you'd go File->Print select the printer you want to edit, click Properties and set the command to either /usr/local/bin/lpr (for the lpr interface to CUPS) or kprinter (for the KDE interface to CUPS). Unfortunately this official method is not working for me. I've had to edit the prefs.js directly in order to maintain printing ability. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 18:58:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1201316A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:58:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gojyo83@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5BA43D5E for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gojyo83@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 4so1752715nzn for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:58:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=jTU3y+ONsYkyIOoOypKxvFQIUy943Ie+Q8f6pp6MnQm/HG8XSxntT9ZNk16LHhm8ABTOkfZQQr9wE9OENRByRg2kiZa+gW5IXoBi6UXQA5RpTazzi8VYnXkCebwAOORJ8JK+YJ/prvfv39iEAL3QOHOgcH2MwT65Yq+HIsSwYLM= Received: by 10.65.148.13 with SMTP id a13mr4410462qbo; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.113.1 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:58:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:58:38 +0100 From: Gojyo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Running qmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:58:45 -0000 I've some problem making qmail work. I've installed qmail (with smtp auth support), ucspi-tcp and daemontools from the ports tree (I'm using Freebsd 6.0). I've disabled sendmail running the enable-qmail script after qmail installation (and I can see it's not running), I've copied the "maildir" start script from /var/qmail/boot to /var/qmail/rc and added qmail_enable=3D"YES" to /etc/rc.conf. Now I can't exactly understand what I have to do: I think I have to run qmail from the svscan service, but I really cannot figure out how to do it. I need some help.... thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 19:39:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD9A16A420 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:39:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19F943D5D for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:39:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so339058nfe for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:39:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i+n4/jA+SGuc87NwgMgdOnE6ezWCn7/Rfj5SLJW2lytR2coOgGzzgAtwBPsw2BKxkqR/JBSFqOyw4PH2aoFXj7QYkZmLRFKMyonHOOSDBNuavP1lAcsanjMplHEI0JkfuuyuWanErWSnFLxh5KkjVAzsXuosms/2htJHYUH6V80= Received: by 10.48.234.16 with SMTP id g16mr213652nfh; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:39:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.225.1 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:39:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:39:17 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: Gojyo In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running qmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:39:20 -0000 On 12/18/05, Gojyo wrote: > I've disabled sendmail running the enable-qmail script after qmail > installation (and I can see it's not running), I've copied the "maildir" > start script from /var/qmail/boot to /var/qmail/rc and added > qmail_enable=3D"YES" to /etc/rc.conf. > Now I can't exactly understand what I have to do: I think I have to run > qmail from the svscan service, but I really cannot figure out how to do i= t. > I need some help.... I don't know how qmail is set up on BSD, but if you're using daemontools, bringing qmail up should be as simple as svc -u . Check its current status with svscan . Mike -- Michael P. Soulier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 19:46:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61FB16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:46:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD1643D5D for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:46:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C61D24D43 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:46:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:46:47 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: p27M84pJUE8MqTZAKlXIZJZKAyRA5yDzyexaMM86LFwm 1134935206 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-195-174.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.195.174]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC924571574 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:46:46 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:46:44 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051215134815.GA33024@peach> <200512180418.26053.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <43A53747.80706@thingy.apana.org.au> In-Reply-To: <43A53747.80706@thingy.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512181946.45815.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: foobarred installation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:46:50 -0000 On Sunday 18 December 2005 10:17, David Gerard wrote: > RW wrote: > > From what I've read I wouldn't recommend amd64 for a desktop, as two many > > things are broken, for example 3-d support for your nvidia card. > > That's a pity ... I was thinking in terms of an uber-l33t dual-AMD64 > beast machine running FreeBSD 6 (or maybe 7 by the time I get around to > it) for my next desktop. > > (Not that I ever sit at my desktop any more, and am about to repurpose > my FBSD 5 desktop as FBSD 6 and very much a household *server*.) > > Is there a list or project page on precisely what needs fixing on amd64? > > (I could always run Ubuntu, but I have my laptop for that ...) What's wrong with running i386? Aside from a limited number of activities, such as OGG encoding, there's not much difference in performance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 19:47:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B4716A432 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:47:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (ip30.gte215.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.215.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC97443D46 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:47:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBIJiSmu038485 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:44:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <43A5BC1C.4070509@highperformance.net> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:44:28 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: SPF Startup and P5-Mail-SPF-Query X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:47:15 -0000 I am a little confused about starting Sender Policy Framework on FreeBSD. One doc in samples/ says the milter "will plug right in." Some docs say you don't need to run spfd. Other docs say you need to run sendmail-milter.pl but that script isn't in the packing list. One doc states I should edit my sendmail rc script to start and stop spf-milter. I would have thought that this milter would be started much like spamass-milter. I have modified my sendmail.cf. When I start sendmail I get the error: WARNING: Xspf-milter: local socket name /var/spf-milter/spf-milter.sock missing How do I run SPF using p5-Mail-SPF-Query? Where is the startup script? Thanks, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 19:47:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606DA16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:47:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (ip30.gte215.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.215.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD8A43D80 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:47:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBIJlNXc038550 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:47:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <43A5BCCB.7060005@highperformance.net> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:47:23 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: SPF Startup and P5-Mail-SPF-Query X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:47:57 -0000 I am a little confused about starting Sender Policy Framework on FreeBSD. One doc in samples/ says the milter "will plug right in." Some docs say you don't need to run spfd. Other docs say you need to run sendmail-milter.pl but that script isn't in the packing list. One doc states I should edit my sendmail rc script to start and stop spf-milter. I would have thought that this milter would be started much like spamass-milter. I have modified my sendmail.cf. When I start sendmail I get the error: WARNING: Xspf-milter: local socket name /var/spf-milter/spf-milter.sock missing How do I run SPF using p5-Mail-SPF-Query? Where is the startup script? Thanks, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 19:58:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2EE16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:58:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven.lake@corecomm.com) Received: from mail2.mx.voyager.net (mail2.mx.voyager.net [216.93.66.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB1843D45 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:58:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven.lake@corecomm.com) Received: from dragon.corecomm.com (brick.voyager.net [209.153.128.248]) by mail2.mx.voyager.net (8.13.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id jBIJwiRj049679; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:58:45 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20051218145804.01cac8c8@pop.voyager.net> X-Sender: steven.lake@pop.voyager.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:58:48 -0500 To: Micah From: Steven Lake In-Reply-To: <43A5B143.30102@ywave.com> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20051218120850.00bf96f0@pop.voyager.net> <200512181015.18357.steven.lake@voyager.net> <200512181015.18357.steven.lake@voyager.net> <5.2.0.9.2.20051218120850.00bf96f0@pop.voyager.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0550-4, 12/16/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing problems with Mozilla and Firefox on Freebsd 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:58:48 -0000 At 10:58 AM 12/18/2005 -0800, Micah wrote: >Steven Lake wrote: >>At 07:30 PM 12/18/2005 +0300, Andrew P. wrote: >> >>>On 12/18/05, Steven Lake wrote: >>> > Ok, got a weird one here. Got cups setup with our >>> > new office lan printer and I can print just fine from any >>> > program, EXCEPT Mozilla and Firefox. They go through >>> > the motions, but nothing happens. Nothing shows up in >>> > the que or the access or error logs or anything. Am I >>> > missing something? My research via google into this >>> > found me several pages that mentioned something about >>> > 'msttcorefonts', but after some playing with this they don't >>> > seem to be installable on freebsd. Any suggestions? >>> >>>I think x11-fonts/webfonts may be referenced as msttcorefonts >>>in other distributions. I can't explain why, but try to install the >>>print/gtklp port and change the print command in firefox to >>>gtklp. >> >> Installed webfonts and gtklp and restarted x and no go still. >>:( One thing I did notice is that all the others go to a normal print >>window, but the two browsers go to some custom printing screen and say >>something about "postscript/printer_name" instead of the normal KDE cups >>installed printer. Would that possibly cause part of the issue? > >Firefox isn't a KDE app, so by default is uses /usr/bin/lpr unless you >specifically set it to use another print interface. Unfortunately Firefox >1.5's whole printing system is pretty buggy right now - almost to the >point of unusability on my system. If it was working properly you'd go >File->Print select the printer you want to edit, click Properties and set >the command to either /usr/local/bin/lpr (for the lpr interface to CUPS) >or kprinter (for the KDE interface to CUPS). Unfortunately this official >method is not working for me. I've had to edit the prefs.js directly in >order to maintain printing ability. > >HTH, >Micah WOOT! I used kprinter and it's working! Thanks!! :) Steven Lake Business Support Representative CoreComm Business Services Contact Number: 1-877-557-2724 Direct Line: 1-517-664-8176 "Duct Tape takes over where skill leaves off" - Larry the Cucumber from Veggie Tales. "A bird I am, but a penguin I am not." - Haku From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 20:47:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E7816A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:47:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhanson@securityfocus.com) Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com (outgoing.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3578243D49 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:47:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhanson@securityfocus.com) Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com by outgoing.securityfocus.com via smtpd (for mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:24:09 -0800 Received: from mail.securityfocus.com (mail.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.9]) by outgoing3.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F315E23D8E0 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:10:49 -0700 (MST) Received: (qmail 23266 invoked by uid 1061); 18 Dec 2005 20:40:08 -0000 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:40:08 -0700 From: Daniel Hanson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051218204008.GC7506@securityfocus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6, WPA-PSK, wpa_supplicant and a IBM a31p X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:47:13 -0000 -- uwe@laverenz.de said -- >Yes, probably WPA-encryption is simply not supported by your wireless >card/chipset. AFAIK there is no way to use WPA with a wi-card. You either >stick to WEP-encryption or buy a newer wireless card (ath or iwi would >do WPA-PSK). It was my understanding that WPA could be used on any network card, and is a function of the driver rather than the underlying card. I could be mistaken on that, but I havne't been able to find anything definitive that the wi driver doesn't allow this, and the card (using a different prism2 driver than available from ibm) works under windows (just got it working to see if it was the card). I got it working with WPA-PSK TKIP and I still fail under freebsd, so I figure it's either a bug or I am missing some configuration parameter. So. works under windows, anyone have an idea of how I might try and isolate if this is a driver issue or a config issue? D -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 21:07:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6269716A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:07:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shantanoo@ghar.dhoomketu.net.in) Received: from iqara.net (sendmail.iqara.net [203.187.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313B743D60 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:07:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shantanoo@ghar.dhoomketu.net.in) Received: (qmail 30821 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2005 21:12:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ghar.dhoomketu.net.in) ([219.91.153.219]) (envelope-sender ) by iqara.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Dec 2005 21:12:50 -0000 Received: by ghar.dhoomketu.net.in (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 83E51C530; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:34:41 +0530 (IST) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:34:41 +0530 From: Shantanoo Mahajan To: "Michael P. Soulier" Message-ID: <20051218210441.GA2449@ghar.dhoomketu.net.in> Mail-Followup-To: "Michael P. Soulier" , Gojyo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Hmmm... I dunno X-OS: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE i386 X-UPTIME: 2:28AM up 4:33, 0 users, load averages: 0.83, 0.38, 0.19 X-Mailer-Website: http://www.mutt.org X-GPG-Fingerprint: 614C 591B D401 98ED 1EF1 8BCF 30A1 5685 07A6 AA4B User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r535 (FreeBSD) Cc: Gojyo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running qmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:07:09 -0000 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +++ Michael P. Soulier [freebsd] [18-12-05 14:39 -0500]: | On 12/18/05, Gojyo wrote: | > I've disabled sendmail running the enable-qmail script after qmail | > installation (and I can see it's not running), I've copied the "maildir" | > start script from /var/qmail/boot to /var/qmail/rc and added | > qmail_enable=3D"YES" to /etc/rc.conf. | > Now I can't exactly understand what I have to do: I think I have to run | > qmail from the svscan service, but I really cannot figure out how to do= it. | > I need some help.... |=20 | I don't know how qmail is set up on BSD, but if you're using | daemontools, bringing qmail up should be as simple as svc -u . Check its current status with svscan . sockstat -4l | grep 25 will tell you what is running on port 25 (default smtp port). Also /var/log/maillog maybe be useful along with /var/log/messages. Daemontools can be found out by: cd /usr/ports && make search name=3Ddaemontools if you have installed ports tree. When I tried, I didn't have installation problem. It was very smooth through ports. It took time for me to configure it. Regards, Shantanoo --=20 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDpc7oMKFWhQemqksRAvlFAKCt4E+XYHYbc7j3PzBvyPZTpAbn5QCeOTZI CDqoEt5eaySL8Rzx+v+84o0= =/3Ql -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 21:31:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0994B16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:31:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B12F43D55 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:31:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-185-179-246.woh.res.rr.com [65.185.179.246]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id jBILVDEo019522 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:31:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000301c60419$3de55110$6402a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:23:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: sshd not giving plogin prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:31:18 -0000 Hello, I have a jailed ssh server among other things on a freebsd 5.4 box. I had to change the IP on it from 192.168.9.10 to 192.168.2.10. And now sshd on the jail won't let me log in. I've changed the ListenOn directive in the jails' sshd_config file from 192.168.9.10 to 192.168.2.10, as well as the jails ip in rc.conf. Trying to connect from windows securecrt just times out. Trying to connect from a unix box gives me the error: connection closed by 192.168.2.10. Any ideas? The jail is up, has been restarted and shows up in the jls output. I am stumped. On the subject of jails what devfs settings rules file should i use in rc.conf? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 21:35:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC5016A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:35:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE2743D45 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:35:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.52]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051218213501.EHKL22124.mta10.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net> for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:35:01 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5EE3BB5CD; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:35:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:35:01 -0500 From: Parv To: f-q Message-ID: <20051218213501.GA72282@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: f-q Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Compacting the "pf -v -s rules" output similar to "ipfstat -ionh" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:35:03 -0000 I am currently trying pf instead of ipf; rules were brought over easily besides the user errors. I am still in the process of to be at ease w/ pf logging & statistics. Before i write it myself, has anybody got a already prepared way to compact the "pfctl -v -s rules" output ... pass in on lo0 all [ Evaluations: 22188 Packets: 10925 Bytes: 8392463 States: 0 ] pass out on lo0 all [ Evaluations: 21850 Packets: 10925 Bytes: 8392463 States: 0 ] block drop in on em0 all [ Evaluations: 22188 Packets: 6 Bytes: 360 States: 0 ] block drop in quick on em0 inet proto tcp from 192.168.2.0/24 to any port 137:139 [ Evaluations: 19 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] ... to something like ... 22188 pass in on lo0 all 21850 pass out on lo0 all 22188 block drop in on em0 all 19 block drop in quick on em0 inet proto tcp from 192.168.2.0/24 to any port 137:139 - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 21:46:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B94416A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:46:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@ircnow.org) Received: from scott.blazing.de (scott.blazing.de [80.86.187.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FE043D55 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:46:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@ircnow.org) Received: by scott.blazing.de (Postfix, from userid 510) id 98BF6824C6; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:46:13 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on scott.blazing.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by scott.blazing.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223DB824B5 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:46:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 frank@ircnow.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:46:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:46:08 +0100 From: Frank Steinborn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051218214608.GA92198@scott.blazing.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051218213501.GA72282@holestein.holy.cow> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051218213501.GA72282@holestein.holy.cow> X-PGP: 41F1741D User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r581 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: Compacting the "pf -v -s rules" output similar to "ipfstat -ionh" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:46:16 -0000 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Parv wrote: > I am currently trying pf instead of ipf; rules were brought over > easily besides the user errors. I am still in the process of to be at > ease w/ pf logging & statistics. >=20 > Before i write it myself, has anybody got a already prepared way to > compact the "pfctl -v -s rules" output ... >=20 > pass in on lo0 all > [ Evaluations: 22188 Packets: 10925 Bytes: 8392463 States= : 0 ] > pass out on lo0 all > [ Evaluations: 21850 Packets: 10925 Bytes: 8392463 States= : 0 ] > block drop in on em0 all > [ Evaluations: 22188 Packets: 6 Bytes: 360 States= : 0 ] > block drop in quick on em0 inet proto tcp from 192.168.2.0/24 to any po= rt 137:139 > [ Evaluations: 19 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States= : 0 ] >=20 >=20 > ... to something like ... >=20 > 22188 pass in on lo0 all > 21850 pass out on lo0 all > 22188 block drop in on em0 all > 19 block drop in quick on em0 inet proto tcp from 192.168.2.0/24 to any= port 137:139 Don't use -v, just pfctl -s rules. That, however, won't give you a number of packets/bytes passed to the rules. Frank --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDpdigK0akcUHxdB0RAnRWAKCUk0X6RCVw+8mO0NQJWy+L/7IEqACghDxY ZrkO6/9QUSTPS6wFH/J2HlM= =lKKr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 21:59:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F2B16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:59:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6024243D55 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:59:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 78787 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2005 21:59:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (calartstech@sbcglobal.net@68.127.38.82 with plain) by smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2005 21:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <43A5DBA1.3030001@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:58:57 -0800 From: Jose Borquez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions group Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: PHP startup error in Apache error log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:59:02 -0000 I am running FreeBSD 5.4 with Apache+mod_ssl 1.3.34, mysql-server-5.0.16, mysql-client-5.0.16, php5-5.1.1, and php5-mysql-5.1.1. I see the following error messages every time I attempt to access a php page: PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/local/lib/php/20 050922-debug/mysql.so' - Cannot open "/usr/local/lib/php/20050922-debug/mys ql.so" in Unknown on line 0 Unknown(0) : Warning - PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/local/l ib/php/20050922-debug/mysql.so' - Cannot open "/usr/local/lib/php/20050922- debug/mysql.so" PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/local/lib/php/20 050922-debug/mysql.so' - Cannot open "/usr/local/lib/php/20050922-debug/mys ql.so" in Unknown on line 0 Unknown(0) : Warning - PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/local/l ib/php/20050922-debug/mysql.so' - Cannot open "/usr/local/lib/php/20050922- debug/mysql.so" Could someone please let me know if I have configured something improperly or what I need to look for? Thanks in advance, Jose From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 22:02:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A335B16A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:02:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF8143D4C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:02:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBIM5HP35781; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:05:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Sasa Stupar" , Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:02:02 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <498C0455BE5AC9573152FE62@[192.168.10.249]> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:02:16 -0000 In looking at this again, I didn't realize you were pinging from Win2K Win2K uses the -f option to set the Do Not Fragment bit, UNIX uses the -f option to flood ping. Win2k ping does not have a flood ping option. You can download a ping for Windows from Microsoft here: http://research.microsoft.com/barc/mbone/mping.aspx that does have an option for flooding traffic. ( set the milliseconds between packets very low) but I have not tested it. Doubtless others are available on the Internet. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 6:07 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >Song) > > >Nothing. From the GUI view it is at 0% of utilisation. > >Sasa > >--On 18. december 2005 3:51 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt > >wrote: > >> >> what does the CPU of the router do when your doing that? >> >> Ted >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sasa Stupar >>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:00 AM >>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme >>> Song) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --On 18. december 2005 2:32 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of >Sasa Stupar >>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM >>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>> Theme Song) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM >>>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>>>> Theme Song) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM >>>>>>>>> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >>>>>>>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >>>>>>>>> Theme Song) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ted >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and >>>>>>> without polling: >>>>>>>>> ************** >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with >>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >>>>>>>>> TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> [1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with >>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.200 port 5001 >>>>>>>>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >>>>>>>>> [1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec >>>>>>>>> *************** >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices >>>>>>>> in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in >>>>>>>> use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram >>>>>>>> of the setup, etc. etc. etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. >>>>>>>> Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact >>>>>>>> duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get >identical >>>>>>>> results. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ted >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900 >>>>> and 3C905C >>>>>> >>>>>> The 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD the >driver was >>>>>> written >>>>>> without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot of >>> hardware. I would >>>>>> say >>>>>> there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the >>>>>> ethernet. >>>>>> Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt. >>>>>> >>>>>>> NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel >>>>>>> Pro/100S Nics and >>>>>>> Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400 >>>>>>> with winxp >>>>>>> and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularly >>>>> steller combo, >>>>>> I would question that this system could saturate the >>> ethernet, either. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Diagram: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> dmesg from the router: >>>>>>> ---------------- >>>>>>> $ dmesg >>>>>>> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. >>>>>>> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, >>>>> 1992, 1993, 1994 >>>>>>> The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >>>>>>> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p11 #0: Wed Sep 7 13:49:09 CEST 2005 >>>>>>> root@fb411.neon1.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/M0N0WALL_GENERIC >>>>>>> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >>>>>>> CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (434.32-MHz >686-class CPU) >>>>>>> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Features=0x183f9ff>>>>>> GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> >>>>>>> real memory = 201326592 (196608K bytes) >>>>>>> avail memory = 179142656 (174944K bytes) >>>>>>> Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc1006000. >>>>>>> Preloaded mfs_root "/mfsroot" at 0xc100609c. >>>>>>> Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled >>>>>>> md0: Preloaded image 11534336 bytes at 0xc0504d9c >>>>>>> md1: Malloc disk >>>>>>> Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdef0 >>>>>>> npx0: on motherboard >>>>>>> npx0: INT 16 interface >>>>>>> pcib0: on motherboard >>>>>>> pci0: on pcib0 >>>>>>> pcib1: at device >>>>>>> 1.0 on pci0 >>>>>>> pci1: on pcib1 >>>>>>> isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 >>>>>>> isa0: on isab0 >>>>>>> atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at >>>>>>> device 7.1 on >>>>>>> pci0 >>>>>>> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 >>>>>>> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 >>>>>>> uhci0: port >>>>>>> 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 >>>>>>> at device 7.2 on pci0 >>>>>>> usb0: on uhci0 >>>>>>> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >>>>>>> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>>>>>> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >>>>>>> chip1: port >>>>>>> 0x5000-0x500f at >>>>>>> device 7.3 on pci0 >>>>>>> pci0: (vendor=0x1274, dev=0x1371) at 8.0 irq 11 >>>>>>> fxp0: port 0xd800-0xd83f mem >>>>>>> 0xd0400000-0xd041ffff,0xd0460000-0xd0460fff irq 10 at device >>>>>>> 15.0 on pci0 >>>>>>> fxp0: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:62:f6:06 >>>>>>> inphy0: on miibus0 >>>>>>> inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>>>> fxp1: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem >>>>>>> 0xd0420000-0xd043ffff,0xd0462000-0xd0462fff irq 12 at device >>>>>>> 16.0 on pci0 >>>>>>> fxp1: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:9c:2a:16 >>>>>>> inphy1: on miibus1 >>>>>>> inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>>>> fxp2: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem >>>>>>> 0xd0440000-0xd045ffff,0xd0461000-0xd0461fff irq 7 at device >>>>> 19.0 on pci0 >>>>>>> fxp2: Ethernet address 00:02:b3:8c:e4:f6 >>>>>>> inphy2: on miibus2 >>>>>>> inphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >>>>>>> pmtimer0 on isa0 >>>>>>> fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq >>>>>>> 2 on isa0 >>>>>>> fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold >>>>>>> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >>>>>>> atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >>>>>>> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >>>>>>> sio0: type 16550A, console >>>>>>> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >>>>>>> BRIDGE 020214 loaded >>>>>>> IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. >>>>>>> IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default = block all, >>>>> Logging = enabled >>>>>>> ad0: 3098MB [6296/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 >>>>>>> acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 >>>>>>> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c >>>>>>> fxp1: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>>>> fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>>>> fxp2: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 >>>>>>> ata0: resetting devices .. done >>>>>>> ------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you need more just ask for it. You don't need to be >>> angry. Peace. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> OK, next question: >>>>>> >>>>>> ftp transfer like this uses large packets, rerun the test >>> with ping -f >>>>>> with different ping packet sizes, post the results. >>>>>> >>>>>> Remember, routers have to deal with many sized packets. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ted >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Interesting. I have tested like you've said and I could ping >>>>> with packet >>>>> size 1450 bytes. Everything bigger is telling that "packet must be >>>>> fragmented but DF is set up". This is of course pinging >from winxp to >>>>> server. >>>> >>>> That is normal since under winxp ping sets the DF bit I believe. >>>> >>>> The larger packets are not what matters, the smaller >packets are more >>>> interesting. I find it hard to believe your getting the same >>> throughput >>>> with >>>> flood pinging with 56 byte packets. >>>> >>>> Ted >>>> >>> >>> Here is the output: >>> ------------- >>> C:\Documents and Settings\nathsasa>ping -t -f -l 56 mig29 >>> >>> Preverjanje dosegljivosti mig29.workgroup [192.168.1.200] z >56 B podatk >>> >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> Odgovor od 192.168.1.200: bajtov=56 èas < 1 ms TTL=63 >>> >>> Statistika preverjanja dosegljivosti za 192.168.1.200: >>> Paketov: Poslanih = 46, Prejetih = 46, Izgubljenih = 0 >(0% izguba), >>> Povpreèni èas v milisekundah: >>> Minimum = 0ms, Maksimum = 0ms, Povpreèje = 0ms >>> ----------- >>> >>> It's in my native language but the position is the same as >in english. >>> >>> -- >>> Sasa Stupar >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: >>> 12/16/2005 >>> >> > > > >-- >Sasa Stupar >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: >12/16/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 22:11:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1864D16A436 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:11:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from palstra.com (palstra.demon.nl [212.238.156.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D1143DE6 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:11:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from riemer by palstra.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Eo6kD-000A9e-Ba; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:11:05 +0100 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:11:05 +0100 From: Riemer Palstra To: Jose Borquez Message-ID: <20051218221105.GA37456@p3.a152.palstra.com> References: <43A5DBA1.3030001@sbcglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43A5DBA1.3030001@sbcglobal.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD Questions group Subject: Re: PHP startup error in Apache error log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:11:33 -0000 On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:58:57PM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote: > I am running FreeBSD 5.4 with Apache+mod_ssl 1.3.34, > mysql-server-5.0.16, mysql-client-5.0.16, php5-5.1.1, and > php5-mysql-5.1.1. I see the following error messages every time I > attempt to access a php page: > > PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library > '/usr/local/lib/php/20050922-debug/mysql.so' - Cannot open "/usr/local/lib/php/20050922-debug/mysql.so" in Unknown on line 0 That's quite strange actually. What's the contents of your /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, and what does the extension_dir directive in your /usr/local/etc/php.ini say? My installation of Apache 2.2.0 and PHP 5.1.1 just takes the mysql.so from /usr/local/lib/php/20050922/mysql.so - did you specify any extra debugging options at compile time? -- Riemer Palstra Amsterdam, The Netherlands riemer@palstra.com http://www.palstra.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 22:44:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203D516A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:44:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A39443D5E for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:44:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 96027 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2005 22:44:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (calartstech@sbcglobal.net@68.127.38.82 with plain) by smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2005 22:44:26 -0000 Message-ID: <43A5E649.9070202@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:44:25 -0800 From: Jose Borquez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Riemer Palstra References: <43A5DBA1.3030001@sbcglobal.net> <20051218221105.GA37456@p3.a152.palstra.com> In-Reply-To: <20051218221105.GA37456@p3.a152.palstra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions group Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: PHP startup error in Apache error log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:44:28 -0000 Riemer Palstra wrote: >On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:58:57PM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote: > > >>I am running FreeBSD 5.4 with Apache+mod_ssl 1.3.34, >>mysql-server-5.0.16, mysql-client-5.0.16, php5-5.1.1, and >>php5-mysql-5.1.1. I see the following error messages every time I >>attempt to access a php page: >> >>PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library >>'/usr/local/lib/php/20050922-debug/mysql.so' - Cannot open "/usr/local/lib/php/20050922-debug/mysql.so" in Unknown on line 0 >> >> > >That's quite strange actually. What's the contents of your >/usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, and what does the extension_dir >directive in your /usr/local/etc/php.ini say? > >My installation of Apache 2.2.0 and PHP 5.1.1 just takes the mysql.so >from /usr/local/lib/php/20050922/mysql.so - did you specify any extra >debugging options at compile time? > > > The contents of my extensions.ini file are: extension=mysql.so ; Directory in which the loadable extensions (modules) reside. ; extension_dir = "./" It looks like that is commented out. I am assuming I need to uncomment this as well as extension=msql.so in the Dynamic Extensions section below. Am I correct? ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; Dynamic Extensions ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; ; If you wish to have an extension loaded automatically, use the following ; syntax: ; ; extension=modulename.extension ; ; For example, on Windows: ; ; extension=msql.dll ; ; ... or under UNIX: ; ; extension=msql.so From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 22:54:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1003F16A427 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon.crosby@endace.com) Received: from www.endace.com (endace.smrn.com [209.234.97.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FBE43D45 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:54:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon.crosby@endace.com) Received: from et.endace.com (203-97-51-114.dsl.clear.net.nz [203.97.51.114]) by www.endace.com (8.13.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBIMseXG022591 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:54:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from orthos.et.endace.com (orthos.et.endace.com [192.168.64.151]) (authenticated bits=0) by et.endace.com (8.13.5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBIMsYBh043176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:54:35 +1300 (NZDT) From: Simon Crosby To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:54:34 +1300 Message-Id: <1134946474.3498.5.camel@orthos.et.endace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20051115, clamav-milter version devel-300905 on www.endace.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1212/Mon Dec 19 00:09:50 2005 on et.endace.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: ATA problems on Supermicro X6DHE motherboards X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:54:42 -0000 Hello, I have a a machine with a Supermicro X6DHE-XG2 motherboard and one with a X6DHE-G2 motherboard. When I try to install FreeBSD 5.4 on these machines I get "FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out" messages while the installer is booting. The installer does manage to start, but when you go to the fdisk screen it says there are no disks to install to. The installation can be done in safe mode however. When the installation is finished these machines hang during startup unless booted in safe mode. I have seen instructions on the web for creating a "safe mode kernel" that can boot without problems, but since these these machines will be used for testing so it is important to have the normal kernel. I have also tried FreeBSD 6.0, with the same problems. Here are some screen captures of the messages: Error messages on the machines while booting the installer: X6DHE-G2 http://www.baud-bandit.com/x6dhe-g2-install.png X6DHE-XG2 http://www.baud-bandit.com/x6dhe-xg2-install.png Error messages on the machines while booting the installation: X6DHE-G2 http://www.baud-bandit.com/x6dhe-g2-boot.png X6DHE-XG2 http://www.baud-bandit.com/x6dhe-xg2-boot-page1.png http://www.baud-bandit.com/x6dhe-xg2-boot-page2.png Another similar case i've seen: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2005-February/011693.html Any advice or help appreciated. Simon Crosby From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 22:55:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7716016A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:55:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arno.beekman@amadeus.demon.nl) Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AEE43D77 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:55:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arno.beekman@amadeus.demon.nl) Received: from amadeus.demon.nl ([82.161.18.200]:56156 helo=[10.0.1.2]) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Eo7RQ-000NNb-3n; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:55:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87acey71y7.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> References: <87acey71y7.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Arno Beekman Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:55:40 +0100 To: Ludo Koren X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum: adding plex and subdisks to existing volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:55:55 -0000 On 18 dec 2005, at 18:24, Ludo Koren wrote: > > Any help appreciated, I cannot find useful hints. > http://www.vinumvm.org/ http://www.freebsddiary.org/vinum.php man 4 vinum man 8 vinum http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/vinum- vinum.html http://devel.reinikainen.net/docs/how-to/Vinum/ Arno From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 23:17:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9327616A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:17:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sveinhal@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4F043D69 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:17:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sveinhal@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so788221wxc for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:17:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e/QJltRvc37ncCRiftQTdcRCeEAEOjxSqQXJCvsRdYq3A1AR0n7HDI1k+JKD7ivdECBMwCy+To94+/Jc3Ma910OHMfByqc11rxLoU63UT+51VMoVVS2vEiVQUdKNRnDTHuUZ06JGJsBZJjzbt4Josm0EL729HVcUTIOWMF4bH0w= Received: by 10.70.89.3 with SMTP id m3mr3759453wxb; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:17:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.105.11 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:17:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:17:48 +0100 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen Sender: sveinhal@gmail.com To: Gojyo In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running qmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:17:49 -0000 On 12/18/05, Gojyo wrote: > I've some problem making qmail work. > I've installed qmail (with smtp auth support), ucspi-tcp and daemontools > from the ports tree (I'm using Freebsd 6.0). > > I've disabled sendmail running the enable-qmail script after qmail > installation (and I can see it's not running), I've copied the "maildir" > start script from /var/qmail/boot to /var/qmail/rc and added > qmail_enable=3D"YES" to /etc/rc.conf. > Now I can't exactly understand what I have to do: I think I have to run > qmail from the svscan service, but I really cannot figure out how to do i= t. > I need some help.... You shouldn't need daemontools and the svscan utility (though it is useful for a number of reasons). The qmail port should have installed a symlink in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/qmail.sh pointing to /var/qmail/rc. This link is broken by default, but by moving or copying a file from the /var/qmail/boot directory to this location, the link should resolve and the script executed at startup. The scripts are non-rcng so you shouldn't need anything in /etc/rc.conf to make things work. You may need to edit the startup script /var/qmail/rc though. I would, however, recomend that you install daemontools also. This would require a little more initial work on your part, but is far easier to maintain, and makes sure that qmail keep running. Svein Halvor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 23:23:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794F816A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:23:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Levitch@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF5143D5C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:23:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Levitch@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout14/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jBINNVkA027987; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.255.255.73] (loudsl01.4.0.6.185.c.iglou.com [64.253.111.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id jBINNThi005217; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:23:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43A5EF71.8050309@mac.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:23:29 -0500 From: Darrel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051214) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar , questions@freebsd.org References: <43A56C6F.5020901@mac.com> <20051218204605.Q34065@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <20051218204605.Q34065@chylonia.3miasto.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: wireless server | AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:23:33 -0000 >> >> Does someone have a suggestion of which card to get for making a >> FreeBSD 6 wireless server on AMD64? >> After some more searching, I think that this is the document: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/hardware.html I am planning to set up a server for notebook computers to connect through. I am going to test it on AMD64 first and move the configuration to an old Intel later. Authentication will be over Microsoft CHAP to a Radius server. Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 01:10:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3D716A424 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E30A43D53 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so349571nfe for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:10:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=edwMQ0WgqWVfXIxtYwNiDdQ1ZSH7Sak8ar8PqWF7NsfusdMSGWxXYZ3oNhUNea1+CmfziwOjo8y0Dr4nGnjkdBsuojPoC97bRmWfIQiqzBt7Nh/EaN6VMaTihyhb7EKm7+DJUMm53x5x5mpfnpS8j1XsYg7EgWvCtAaNz+cMweA= Received: by 10.48.249.2 with SMTP id w2mr222001nfh; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:10:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.225.1 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:10:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:10:04 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: "Michael P. Soulier" , Gojyo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: make targets, was: Running qmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:10:07 -0000 On 12/18/05, Shantanoo Mahajan wrote: > Daemontools can be found out by: > > cd /usr/ports && make search name=3Ddaemontools Where are these make options in ports documented? I'd like to know all of the options available in ports. I usually just cd /usr/ports && ls -d */*daemontools* A target that tells me what a port has in the way of options would be nice = too. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 01:31:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E057816A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:31:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhanson@securityfocus.com) Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com (outgoing.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEE843D49 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:31:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhanson@securityfocus.com) Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com by outgoing.securityfocus.com via smtpd (for mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:31:24 -0800 Received: from mail.securityfocus.com (mail.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.9]) by outgoing3.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FFC82377EF for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:55:00 -0700 (MST) Received: (qmail 15828 invoked by uid 1061); 19 Dec 2005 01:24:18 -0000 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:24:18 -0700 From: Daniel Hanson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051219012418.GD7506@securityfocus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: a31p, wi driver, and WPA (followup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:31:25 -0000 Well, I know the problem now. The wi driver doesn't support WPA, even though the firmware on the card in question (and probably a few other prism based cards) does support WPA. I found a thread in the FreeBSD-Stable mailing list from just a few days ago that clarifies this. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=632961+0+archive/2005/freebsd-stable/20051218.freebsd-stable http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=401367+0+archive/2005/freebsd-stable/20051218.freebsd-stable As the second link indicates, it doesn't look like Sam has the time or energy to resolve the situation, seems like it's back to WeP for me.... I should have paid closer attention to the capabilities that the driver was reporting instead of assuming that because the card supported it... well live and learn. Thanks D -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 02:58:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD93116A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:58:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6D243D60 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:58:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so1011828wra for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:58:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=epXUz74TfJAJ3LL+66+H6ogTwrv9yD/gcaj/UDmPAjI0InI1qbOv0rm+5ubMKoiMJ0UGn0Ltkg+3VWbu8GAr60CC2VnDgn91cbJPFTfdtxq/KS5/JbAF7wt2b96nqvyYSrikbMLnm+olcvgOY9u3RgFcPhs6sNmsC4IrH24auKU= Received: by 10.65.110.8 with SMTP id n8mr2647136qbm; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:58:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.194.11 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:58:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e4453640512181858qdcf8e2ay640326713dee89be@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:58:15 -0700 From: TuxGirl To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Value too large to be stored in data type -- gzipped tarball X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:58:16 -0000 I have a gzipped tarball that I created on my box when i was running Linux, and I burned it, along with some other files, onto a dvd. I'm now trying to extract the tarball, but it appears that it must be over some sort of filesystem limit or something. None of the commands that I have tried seem to like the file. Each of them gives the same error: /cdrom/music.tgz: Value too large to be stored in data type It doesn't complain about another gzipped tarball on the same disk which is around 1.3 GB, but this one is, I think around 2.4 GB. I've tried copying the file, and tarring it in place, and a number of other things,and I just can't seem to figure out how to resolve the problem. Is there a setting someplace that I can change to make it play nicely with large files? I would think that having a limit on the size of files would cause problems not only with files like this, but also with databases and such, so there must be some way to find the necessary information. Obligatory system info: [amon-re erins] uname -a FreeBSD amon-re 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 =20 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Currently running the default kernel... I'm fairly certain that the tarball is fine, because it worked fine on my server last week, when i opened it up there... Thanks, ~Erin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 03:03:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE6716A500 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:03:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.hamann@forestinformatics.com) Received: from stimpy.forestinformatics.com (cvo-cr1-200-239.peak.org [69.59.200.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEED43D5E for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:03:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.hamann@forestinformatics.com) Received: from mothra (rodan [192.168.0.11]) by stimpy.forestinformatics.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id jBJ337Oo057563 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:03:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeff.hamann@forestinformatics.com) Message-ID: <000901c60448$bcd7e620$0c00a8c0@mothra> From: "Jeff D. Hamann" To: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:03:02 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on stimpy.forestinformatics.com Subject: httpd_flags="-DSSL"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:03:12 -0000 I've searched plenty looking for the proper method to get apache2 to start up at boot time with little success. I've tried the various combinations of httpd_flags/apache2_flags/apache_flags= to my rc.conf file to no avail: bobby# cat rc.conf blah, blah, blah... apache_enable="YES" httpd_flags="-DSSL" blah, blah, blah... bobby# What's the trick? I've fixed the cert file to not require the dialog on startup and have been able to start apache2 using the command: /usr/local/sbin/apachectl startssl and then it starts without the dialog. Ideas? Jeff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 03:08:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F4C16A41F; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:08:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.hamann@forestinformatics.com) Received: from stimpy.forestinformatics.com (cvo-cr1-200-239.peak.org [69.59.200.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606FD43D58; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:08:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.hamann@forestinformatics.com) Received: from mothra (rodan [192.168.0.11]) by stimpy.forestinformatics.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id jBJ38kOo057579; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:08:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeff.hamann@forestinformatics.com) Message-ID: <004301c60449$865f3cf0$0c00a8c0@mothra> From: "Jeff D. Hamann" To: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:08:40 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on stimpy.forestinformatics.com Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:08:50 -0000 I've been noticing this message on startup (using dmesg) acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package and can't figure out what it is, what it's for and why there are so many? FreeBSD bobby.somewhere.com 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #2: Sun Nov 27 14:07:55 PST 2005 hamannj@bobby.somewhere.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and bobby# dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #2: Sun Nov 27 14:07:55 PST 2005 hamannj@bobby.forestinformatics.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ (1995.01-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xf4a Stepping = 10 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500800 real memory = 1576271872 (1503 MB) avail memory = 1511051264 (1441 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link4: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link5: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link6: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link7: irq 5 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package acpi_perf0: invalid _PSS package pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 2.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 2.5 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 pci0: at device 2.7 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xfbefc000-0xfbefcfff irq 20 at device 3.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xfbefd000-0xfbefdfff irq 21 at device 3.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci2: mem 0xfbefe000-0xfbefefff irq 22 at device 3.2 on pci0 ohci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb2: on ohci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfbeff000-0xfbefffff irq 23 at device 3.3 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: EHCI version 1.0 usb3: companion controllers, 3 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3: on ehci0 usb3: USB revision 2.0 uhub3: SiS EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered pci0: at device 4.0 (no driver attached) atapci1: port 0xa800-0xa807,0xa400-0xa403,0xa000-0xa007,0x9800-0x9803,0x9400-0x940f,0x9000-0x907f irq 17 at device 5.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 pcib2: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 7.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 rl0: port 0x8800-0x88ff mem 0xfbefb800-0xfbefb8ff irq 17 at device 10.0 on pci0 miibus0: on rl0 rlphy0: on miibus0 rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto rl0: Ethernet address: 00:11:95:24:60:b3 acpi_button0: on acpi0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1995009076 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 190782MB at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA66 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a bobby# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 03:12:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1942616A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:12:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu) Received: from smtp02.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (smtp02.smtp.Vanderbilt.Edu [129.59.1.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E80043D78 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:12:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu) Received: from smtp02.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp02.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/VU-3.7.9C+d3.7.9) with ESMTP id jBJ3C1JV017788 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:12:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.10.1.151] (adsl-065-006-140-128.sip.bna.bellsouth.net [65.6.140.128]) by smtp02.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/VU-3.7.9.3B+d3.7.9) with ESMTP id jBJ3BxUM017744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:11:59 -0600 (CST) From: Don Hinton Organization: ISIS To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:10:27 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <000901c60448$bcd7e620$0c00a8c0@mothra> In-Reply-To: <000901c60448$bcd7e620$0c00a8c0@mothra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart378321414.yWWkh2tEbv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512182110.33506.don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu> Subject: Re: httpd_flags="-DSSL"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:12:13 -0000 --nextPart378321414.yWWkh2tEbv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Jeff: On Sunday 18 December 2005 21:03, Jeff D. Hamann wrote: > I've searched plenty looking for the proper method to get apache2 to start > up at boot time with little success. I've tried the various combinations = of > httpd_flags/apache2_flags/apache_flags=3D to my rc.conf file to no avail: > > bobby# cat rc.conf > blah, blah, blah... > apache_enable=3D"YES" > httpd_flags=3D"-DSSL" > blah, blah, blah... > bobby# > > What's the trick? I've fixed the cert file to not require the dialog on > startup and have been able to start apache2 using the command: > > /usr/local/sbin/apachectl startssl > > and then it starts without the dialog. > > Ideas? Make sure your apache2.sh file exists and is executable, you probably need = to=20 rename if from apache2.sh.sample (or something like that), e.g.: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache2.sh Also, it will contain the flags you need to set in rc.conf. hth... don > > Jeff. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 Don Hinton 615.480.5667 ISIS, Vanderbilt University --nextPart378321414.yWWkh2tEbv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDpiSp0U0xbM5cLs0RAnP/AKCc8ev5gNDJUjvMch8fJdiWYS4zagCgiR67 O95vddBoKHtAh70VXn9Z4cU= =DhfE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart378321414.yWWkh2tEbv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 03:32:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD0816A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:32:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6880143D4C for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:32:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.52]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051219033255.HENR14388.mta9.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net> for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:32:55 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E639B5CB; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:33:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:33:00 -0500 From: Parv To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051219033259.GA1159@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051218213501.GA72282@holestein.holy.cow> <20051218214608.GA92198@scott.blazing.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051218214608.GA92198@scott.blazing.de> Subject: Re: Compacting the "pf -v -s rules" output similar to "ipfstat -ionh" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:32:57 -0000 in message <20051218214608.GA92198@scott.blazing.de>, wrote Frank Steinborn thusly... > > Parv wrote: > > > > Before i write it myself, has anybody got a already prepared way to > > compact the "pfctl -v -s rules" output ... > > > > pass in on lo0 all > > [ Evaluations: 22188 Packets: 10925 Bytes: 8392463 States: 0 ] > > pass out on lo0 all > > [ Evaluations: 19 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] ... > > ... to something like ... > > > > 22188 pass in on lo0 all > > 21850 pass out on lo0 all ... > Don't use -v, just pfctl -s rules. That, however, won't give you a > number of packets/bytes passed to the rules. Yes i am aware of that. Without '-v' all i get only the parsed/loaded rules which is not very useful to me. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 03:44:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADAB16A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:44:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E01B43D69 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:44:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so811686wxc for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:44:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cxIiwk+Zd1XYJG2vELd+IEM6h1Vvb2IMOqaRkwEJ6C0UJEXZDAgeYLfxEzw0JZJ/2ztWTdbvrluMq/pCve0ernsxil7b0NCJYBQBhVpdVupz0mPiC7HdrKSlPJKHkfsJwmzdQkBPSb26kJ8jpGbNcRhPOuKrGeCpPYqxfbVseWo= Received: by 10.70.102.16 with SMTP id z16mr3922316wxb; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:44:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.66.9 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:44:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:44:38 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton To: TuxGirl In-Reply-To: <6e4453640512181858qdcf8e2ay640326713dee89be@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e4453640512181858qdcf8e2ay640326713dee89be@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Value too large to be stored in data type -- gzipped tarball X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:44:41 -0000 On 12/18/05, TuxGirl wrote: > I have a gzipped tarball that I created on my box when i was running > Linux, and I burned it, along with some other files, onto a dvd. I'm > now trying to extract the tarball, but it appears that it must be over > some sort of filesystem limit or something. None of the commands that > I have tried seem to like the file. Each of them gives the same [snip] > I'm fairly certain that the tarball is fine, because it worked fine on > my server last week, when i opened it up there... Might want try a different implementation of tar then.... cd /usr/ports/archivers; make search name=3D"tar"| more From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 03:47:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B512316A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:47:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@mitchit.com) Received: from mail.mitchit.com (adsl-64-118-245-238.netrox.net [64.118.245.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFADF43D6A for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:47:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mitch@mitchit.com) Received: (qmail 95114 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2005 03:39:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail.mitchit.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Dec 2005 03:39:42 -0000 Received: from 64.118.245.238 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mitch@mitchit.com) by mail.mitchit.com with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:39:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1874.64.118.245.238.1134963582.squirrel@mail.mitchit.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:39:42 -0500 (EST) From: "Mitch" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ipnat and ipf with active ftp issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mitch@mitchit.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:47:18 -0000 I am just trying to setup a 2nd ip address to use active ftp. Active FTP works on the ext-add1 but not ext-add2 below.  IF someone could please point me in the right directions. This is something I have done before, it is 2 different ftp servers from 1 freebsd firewall. 4.10-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #2: root@firewall:/etc# ipf -V ipf: IP Filter: v3.4.31 (336) Kernel: IP Filter: v3.4.31              Running: yes Log Flags: 0 = none set Default: block all, Logging: available Active list: 0 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ root@firewa/etc# vi ipnat.rules map dc1 192.168.1.0/24 -> ext-add1/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:60000 map dc1 192.168.1.0/24 -> ext-add1/32 map dc1 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map dc1 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map dc1 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 rdr dc1 ext-add1/32 port 22 -> 192.168.1.99 port 22 tcp #test rdr dc1 ext-add1/32 port 21 -> 192.168.1.165 port 21 tcp #ftp01 rdr dc1 ext-add1/32 port 80 -> 192.168.1.199 port 80 tcp #http://test rdr dc1 ext-add2/32 port 20 -> 192.168.1.196 port 20 tcp #ftp02 rdr dc1 ext-add2/32 port 21 -> 192.168.1.196 port 21 tcp #ftp02 rdr dc1 ext-add2/32 port 22 -> 192.168.1.196 port 22 tcp #ftp02 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ root@firewa:/etc# vi ipf.rules block in quick from any to any with short block in quick from any to any with ipopt pass in quick on lo0 from any to any block in quick on dc0 from any to any head 100 pass in quick proto tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any flags S/FSRA keep state group 100 pass in quick proto udp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep state group 100 pass in quick proto icmp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep state group 100 pass in quick proto esp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep state keep frags group 100 pass in quick proto gre from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep state group 100 block in log quick on dc1 from any to any head 200 block in quick from 10.0.0.0/8 to any group 200 block in quick from 127.0.0.0/8 to any group 200 block in quick from 172.16.0.0/12 to any group 200 block in quick from 192.168.0.0/16 to any group 200 pass in quick proto udp from any to 192.168.1.225/32 port = 5060 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto udp from any to 192.168.1.225/32 port = 5061 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 20 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 21 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 22 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.165/32 port = 25 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 80 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 443 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 1433 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 3389 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to any port = 5900 keep state group 200 pass in quick proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.196/32 port 60001 >< 60050 keep state group 200 block in quick from any to any pass out quick on lo0 from any to any block out quick on dc0 from any to any head 150 pass out quick proto icmp from 192.168.1.99/32 to 192.168.1.0/24 keep state group 150 pass out quick proto tcp from 192.168.1.99/32 to 192.168.1.0/24 keep state group 150 pass out quick proto udp from 192.168.1.99/32 to 192.168.1.0/24 keep state group 150 pass out quick proto gre from any to any keep state group 150 block out quick on dc1 from any to any head 250 pass out quick proto tcp from any to any keep state group 250 pass out quick proto udp from any to any keep state group 250 pass out quick proto icmp from any to any keep state group 250 pass out quick proto gre from any to any keep state group 250 block out quick from any to any     From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 03:48:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576C816A420 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:48:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF2843D66 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so1017324wra for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:48:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=doQmA0QaFt7mF+7MWtwgs1vMTk5nTIc8tTMVE0iTU8YvPGH1T63siyzWsEGrqmKW0uWcvjjGP3uLXIZJMAxgnJaJzV1Rg9Z22Icr5H2AziDFgm562QRoqeWhe3nAhvyTVOe1D9uxx/ub8Oj+jRUGVKPpveRPwr7uQgh03yVBQoM= Received: by 10.65.160.12 with SMTP id m12mr2622785qbo; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:48:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.194.11 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:48:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e4453640512181948y47c6578fu153c11c2256ac56e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:48:32 -0700 From: TuxGirl To: Nikolas Britton , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e4453640512181858qdcf8e2ay640326713dee89be@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Value too large to be stored in data type -- gzipped tarball X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:48:39 -0000 > > I have a gzipped tarball that I created on my box when i was running > > Linux, and I burned it, along with some other files, onto a dvd. I'm > > now trying to extract the tarball, but it appears that it must be over > > some sort of filesystem limit or something. None of the commands that > > I have tried seem to like the file. Each of them gives the same > > [snip] > > > I'm fairly certain that the tarball is fine, because it worked fine on > > my server last week, when i opened it up there... > > Might want try a different implementation of tar then.... > cd /usr/ports/archivers; make search name=3D"tar"| more I will try this, however, when I mentioned that other commands were also not playing nicely with the file, I was referring to commands such as cp, mv, and ls. I'll see if another tar command will work, though. thanks for the reply! ~Erin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 04:09:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16D916A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:09:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ripper@MIT.EDU) Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ACE43D5A for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ripper@MIT.EDU) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id jBJ49SW1024086 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:09:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from home-on-the-dome.mit.edu (HOME-ON-THE-DOME.MIT.EDU [18.7.16.76]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as ripper@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.12.4) with ESMTP id jBJ3vqQh009511 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:57:53 -0500 (EST) Received: (from ripper@localhost) by home-on-the-dome.mit.edu (8.12.9) id jBJ3vqRo027276; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:57:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:57:52 -0500 From: Ross Adams Lippert To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051219035752.GA27224@home-on-the-dome.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 Cc: Subject: flash plugin in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:09:31 -0000 Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any upgrade? (not subbed) -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 04:19:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC0A16A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:19:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D4D43D58 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:19:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.52]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051219041910.CUAK22124.mta10.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net> for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:19:10 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA858B5CB; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:19:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:19:14 -0500 From: Parv To: f-q Message-ID: <20051219041914.GA2544@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: f-q References: <20051218213501.GA72282@holestein.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051218213501.GA72282@holestein.holy.cow> Subject: Re: Compacting the "pf -v -s rules" output similar to "ipfstat -ionh" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:19:11 -0000 in message <20051218213501.GA72282@holestein.holy.cow>, wrote Parv thusly... > > Before i write it myself, has anybody got a already prepared way > to compact the "pfctl -v -s rules" output ... > > pass in on lo0 all > [ Evaluations: 22188 Packets: 10925 Bytes: 8392463 States: 0 ] > pass out on lo0 all > [ Evaluations: 21850 Packets: 10925 Bytes: 8392463 States: 0 ] ... > ... to something like ... > > 22188 pass in on lo0 all > 21850 pass out on lo0 all ... I think i found /a solution/ in pflogd(8) man page via use of tcpdump. I just have to get used to pf way of doing things like use of bpf device & use of tcpdump to view rules statistics i suppose. Ugh! (but what else can i do if i will be using pf?) - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 04:30:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B7616A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:30:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from skewer.dreamhost.com (skewer.dreamhost.com [64.111.107.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D93D43D5A for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpe-24-24-83-9.stny.res.rr.com [24.24.83.9]) by skewer.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AD37C6D1 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:30:06 -0800 (PST) From: Dev Tugnait To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051219035752.GA27224@home-on-the-dome.mit.edu> References: <20051219035752.GA27224@home-on-the-dome.mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:30:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1134966603.62646.22.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: flash plugin in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dev@unixdaemon.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:30:08 -0000 What vexing problem? Care to share it... install www/linuxpluginwrapper WITH_PLUGINS=YES On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 22:57 -0500, Ross Adams Lippert wrote: > Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing > problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any > upgrade? > > (not subbed) > > > -r > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Dev Tugnait From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 04:48:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B539C16A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:48:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from vfemail.net (miwi2dsl-a234.wi.tds.net [216.170.248.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F4C43D45 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:48:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: (qmail 84622 invoked by uid 85); 19 Dec 2005 04:48:13 -0000 Received: from akbeech@gmail.com by mail.vfemail.net by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.75.1. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:. Processed in 1.487763 secs); 19 Dec 2005 04:48:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.84?) (alaska@vfemail.net@209.124.141.64) by miwi2dsl-a234.wi.tds.net with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 19 Dec 2005 04:48:12 -0000 From: Beecher Rintoul Organization: NorthWind Communications To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:47:58 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051219035752.GA27224@home-on-the-dome.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20051219035752.GA27224@home-on-the-dome.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2468305.goGo8JaHck"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512181948.10598.akbeech@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Adams Lippert Subject: Re: flash plugin in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:48:18 -0000 --nextPart2468305.goGo8JaHck Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 18 December 2005 06:57 pm, Ross Adams Lippert wrote: > Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing > problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any > upgrade? That port is borked, here's what you have to do to get it working: ## Workaround for broken port linuxpluginwrapper. ## Before building linuxpluginwrapper: rm -R /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_linux_plugins ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_linux_plugins ## Build linuxpluginwrapper: cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper make -DWITH_PLUGINS install clean ## or upgrade: portupgrade -vm -DWITH_PLUGINS linuxpluginwrapper ## Remove symlink (will break Mozilla). rm -rf /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_linux_plugins ## Fix acroread: rm -rf /usr/local/bin/acroread # If upgrade. mv =A0/usr/local/bin/acroread7 /usr/local/bin/acroread rm -rf /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so ln=20 =2Ds /usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux= /nppdf.so /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so ## Change path to nppdf.so in /etc/libmap.conf: # Acrobat7 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror [/usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppd= f.so]=20 libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/acrobat.so ## Acroread now works properly in browser. ## Helix plugin does not work with Firefox or Mozilla at this time.=20 ## Flash 6.0 works without modification. ## Flash7 is VERY unstable and will crash Firefox (possibly Mozilla). ## Launch browser and type "about:plugins" without the quotes to check that= =20 plugins are enabled. Beech =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@gmail.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://akparadise.byethost33.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart2468305.goGo8JaHck Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDpjuKVq19LUoGB+MRAvrhAKCVtPBMitGtakUqn2iKywq6b6Q4sgCfesMO l/aAuGjRvONPXmrEAsDK/Kw= =uepv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2468305.goGo8JaHck-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 04:53:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC8916A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:53:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B930043D45 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:53:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so818909wxc for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:53:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=G3EiOdGyxl7JT1Ct1LzZqtSGFDtYa4pIwsSW16HN4iXBjGfmDqyBFRshy4pnV30l/0SHHSiysFpsMYFQMonHbLkT/6bbtoPVNIRNzsFvgUELDW/uwgcu7Q9fR0l3yLOWn81Ek1Av+UKi3ndrPoPdLsp4HUw0R71QHo77rSUTzbU= Received: by 10.70.102.16 with SMTP id z16mr3989726wxb; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:53:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.66.9 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:53:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:53:07 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton To: TuxGirl In-Reply-To: <6e4453640512181948y47c6578fu153c11c2256ac56e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e4453640512181858qdcf8e2ay640326713dee89be@mail.gmail.com> <6e4453640512181948y47c6578fu153c11c2256ac56e@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Value too large to be stored in data type -- gzipped tarball X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:53:09 -0000 On 12/18/05, TuxGirl wrote: > > > I have a gzipped tarball that I created on my box when i was running > > > Linux, and I burned it, along with some other files, onto a dvd. I'm > > > now trying to extract the tarball, but it appears that it must be ove= r > > > some sort of filesystem limit or something. None of the commands tha= t > > > I have tried seem to like the file. Each of them gives the same > > > > [snip] > > > > > I'm fairly certain that the tarball is fine, because it worked fine o= n > > > my server last week, when i opened it up there... > > > > Might want try a different implementation of tar then.... > > cd /usr/ports/archivers; make search name=3D"tar"| more > > I will try this, however, when I mentioned that other commands were > also not playing nicely with the file, I was referring to commands > such as cp, mv, and ls. I'll see if another tar command will work, > though. thanks for the reply! > ~Erin > There is nothing wrong with tar and large files, it's synonymous with what tar is used for. I think your problem is just a Linux tar to FreeBSD tar quirk. I had no problems with the 3.3GB testfile I made for tar and gzip to play with: > uname -a FreeBSD spectra.intranet 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Dec 11 02:56:58 CST 2005 =20 nbritton@spectra.intranet:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/Info-Matic i386 > cat /dev/random > testfile > ls -al testfile -rw-r--r-- 1 nbritton nbritton 3526029312 Dec 18 22:12 testfile > md5 testfile MD5 (testfile) =3D 83e574c15a7daf44f063d140d3577630 > tar -czf testfile.tar.gz testfile > ls -al testfile* -rw-r--r-- 1 nbritton nbritton 3526029312 Dec 18 22:12 testfile -rw-r--r-- 1 nbritton nbritton 3527105097 Dec 18 22:32 testfile.tar.gz > rm testfile; tar -xf testfile.tar.gz; md5 testfile MD5 (testfile) =3D 83e574c15a7daf44f063d140d3577630 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 05:01:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C6616A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:01:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from vfemail.net (miwi2dsl-a234.wi.tds.net [216.170.248.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300EE43D53 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:01:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: (qmail 93794 invoked by uid 85); 19 Dec 2005 05:01:36 -0000 Received: from akbeech@gmail.com by mail.vfemail.net by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.75.1. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:. Processed in 1.452264 secs); 19 Dec 2005 05:01:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.84?) (alaska@vfemail.net@209.124.141.64) by miwi2dsl-a234.wi.tds.net with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 19 Dec 2005 05:01:34 -0000 From: Beecher Rintoul Organization: NorthWind Communications To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:01:20 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051219035752.GA27224@home-on-the-dome.mit.edu> <200512181948.10598.akbeech@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512181948.10598.akbeech@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1173472.rkcjB4rjKg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512182001.32717.akbeech@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Adams Lippert Subject: Re: flash plugin in 6.0 (Fixed Typo) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:01:41 -0000 --nextPart1173472.rkcjB4rjKg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 18 December 2005 07:47 pm, Beecher Rintoul wrote: > On Sunday 18 December 2005 06:57 pm, Ross Adams Lippert wrote: > > Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing > > problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any > > upgrade? > > That port is borked, here's what you have to do to get it working: > > ## Workaround for broken port linuxpluginwrapper. > > ## Before building linuxpluginwrapper: > > rm -R /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_linux_plugins > > ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_linux_plugins > > > ## Build linuxpluginwrapper: > > cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > > make -DWITH_PLUGINS install clean > > ## or upgrade: > > portupgrade -vm -DWITH_PLUGINS linuxpluginwrapper > > ## Remove symlink (will break Mozilla). > rm -rf /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_linux_plugins <------------- Typo in last=20 email. This is the proper command. > > > ## Fix acroread: > > rm -rf /usr/local/bin/acroread # If upgrade. > > mv =A0/usr/local/bin/acroread7 /usr/local/bin/acroread > > rm -rf /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so > > ln > -s=20 > /usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/npp= df >.so /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so > > ## Change path to nppdf.so in /etc/libmap.conf: > > # Acrobat7 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror > [/usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/np= pd >f.so] libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/acrobat.so > > > ## Acroread now works properly in browser. > ## Helix plugin does not work with Firefox or Mozilla at this time. > ## Flash 6.0 works without modification. > ## Flash7 is VERY unstable and will crash Firefox (possibly Mozilla). > > ## Launch browser and type "about:plugins" without the quotes to check th= at > plugins are enabled. > Beech =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@gmail.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://akparadise.byethost33.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1173472.rkcjB4rjKg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDpj6sVq19LUoGB+MRAg57AJ9bxW0X+kkipPa6NOsY6X1leRrWVQCgrctJ F0SOaiLaOYboisSxKiUMHDU= =3eey -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1173472.rkcjB4rjKg-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 05:23:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AD716A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:23:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from spatula.dreamhost.com (spatula.dreamhost.com [66.33.205.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABE943D5D for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:23:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpe-24-24-83-9.stny.res.rr.com [24.24.83.9]) by spatula.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9D07F0EB; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:23:38 -0800 (PST) From: Dev Tugnait To: Beecher Rintoul In-Reply-To: <200512181948.10598.akbeech@gmail.com> References: <20051219035752.GA27224@home-on-the-dome.mit.edu> <200512181948.10598.akbeech@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:23:35 -0500 Message-Id: <1134969815.79728.6.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ross Adams Lippert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash plugin in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dev@unixdaemon.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:23:41 -0000 On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 19:47 -0900, Beecher Rintoul wrote: > On Sunday 18 December 2005 06:57 pm, Ross Adams Lippert wrote: > > Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing > > problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any > > upgrade? > > That port is borked, here's what you have to do to get it working: > The port is not broken cvsup your tree > ## Workaround for broken port linuxpluginwrapper. > > ## Before building linuxpluginwrapper: > > rm -R /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_linux_plugins > > ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_linux_plugins > > > ## Build linuxpluginwrapper: > > cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > > make -DWITH_PLUGINS install clean > > ## or upgrade: > > portupgrade -vm -DWITH_PLUGINS linuxpluginwrapper > > ## Remove symlink (will break Mozilla). > > rm -rf /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_linux_plugins > I advice not to remove /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins > > ## Fix acroread: > > rm -rf /usr/local/bin/acroread # If upgrade. > > mv /usr/local/bin/acroread7 /usr/local/bin/acroread > > rm -rf /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so > > ln > -s /usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so > > ## Change path to nppdf.so in /etc/libmap.conf: > > # Acrobat7 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror > [/usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so] > libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/acrobat.so > > > ## Acroread now works properly in browser. > ## Helix plugin does not work with Firefox or Mozilla at this time. > ## Flash 6.0 works without modification. > ## Flash7 is VERY unstable and will crash Firefox (possibly Mozilla). > > ## Launch browser and type "about:plugins" without the quotes to check that > plugins are enabled. > > Beech > Refrain from giving bad advice please > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@gmail.com > /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications > \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 > X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 > / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://akparadise.byethost33.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > -- Dev Tugnait From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 05:35:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D99216A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:35:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F54C43D5E for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:34:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 2DE063139C; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:34:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:34:58 -0500 (EST) From: user To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: how do I ... burn an audio CD from .WAV files _and_ add cd-text ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:35:00 -0000 I have wav files. The wav files come from cds that did not have cd-text information on them, so I have no cd-text examples or source files for these wav files. I want to burn an audio cd with some wav files (I know how to do this with burncd and cdrecord) BUT I also want to add cd-text to the newly created, custom audio CD. cdrecord seems as if it is able to do this, but after a night of searching, I do not see how to create the file of text necessary to do this. I am wondering if anyone out there already does this and could share their workflow / work-description ? thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 05:36:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBB616A422 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:36:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BF843D68 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:36:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (83.253.29.241) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.069.1) id 43A17870000DB906 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:36:15 +0100 Received: (qmail 45415 invoked by uid 1001); 19 Dec 2005 06:36:15 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:36:15 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: "Michael P. Soulier" Message-ID: <20051219053615.GA45359@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Michael P. Soulier" , Gojyo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Gojyo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make targets, was: Running qmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:36:19 -0000 On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:10:04PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 12/18/05, Shantanoo Mahajan wrote: > > Daemontools can be found out by: > > > > cd /usr/ports && make search name=daemontools > > Where are these make options in ports documented? I'd like to know all > of the options available in ports. I usually just cd /usr/ports && ls > -d */*daemontools* Most of the make targets available are documented in the ports(7) manpage. > > A target that tells me what a port has in the way of options would be nice too. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 06:06:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F9F16A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:06:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmy@jamesbailie.com) Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFE3F43D5F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmy@jamesbailie.com) Received: (qmail 81583 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2005 06:06:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.29.126.205?) (jazzturk@rogers.com@70.29.126.205 with plain) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2005 06:06:10 -0000 Message-ID: <43A64DD2.8060801@jamesbailie.com> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:06:10 -0500 From: James Bailie User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051218) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051219035752.GA27224@home-on-the-dome.mit.edu> <200512181948.10598.akbeech@gmail.com> <1134969815.79728.6.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> In-Reply-To: <1134969815.79728.6.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: flash plugin in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:06:12 -0000 Dev Tugnait wrote: > The port is not broken cvsup your tree Yes it is. While some things work, it still does not create the proper symbolic link for the acrobat plugin, nor is the path for it correct in the sample libmap.confs. Beecher's fix will correct. -- James Bailie http://www.jamesbailie.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 06:22:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDBF16A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:22:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5333043D5E for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:22:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1125844nzo for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:22:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r3AjfslboIgVJgoRzF/BflKYEevekMrhmSeLab1yiK6GassQHUnRkEbQP0mP6BgixSlOySQv8CW/2mF/dvdtqsc6AGNQ5OItabhlYI9D9fIvSACbH1RiJc/KWY5dEzFtOq8/w/TsCygZjyaCt6XSHczbdw5BL5hQzAc7kxXqYZg= Received: by 10.36.71.10 with SMTP id t10mr5530034nza; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:22:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:22:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:22:55 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: user In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I ... burn an audio CD from .WAV files _and_ add cd-text ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:22:57 -0000 On 12/19/05, user wrote: > > I have wav files. > > The wav files come from cds that did not have cd-text information on them= , > so I have no cd-text examples or source files for these wav files. > > I