From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 01:09:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691D216A423 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:09:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FF643D5C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:09:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a021.otenet.gr [212.205.215.21]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id jBP196jq013610; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:09:06 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C355D117A6; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:07:56 +0200 (EET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:07:56 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Danial Thom Message-ID: <20051225010756.GB1367@flame.pc> References: <200512240719.51264.ringworm01@gmail.com> <20051224153412.26322.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051224153412.26322.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: "Daniel A." , "Michael C. Shultz" , Andy Sjostrom , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:09:10 -0000 On 2005-12-24 07:34, Danial Thom wrote: > Why not just tell the truth, which is that Windows XP is the > best that you can do for the desktop, and that there is no > perfect solution that works perfectly in every scenario? Because it's not the truth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 01:14:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265F816A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:14:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA7043D5C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:14:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a021.otenet.gr [212.205.215.21]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id jBP1E0MU014631; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:14:01 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 76FF1115E3; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:12:51 +0200 (EET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:12:51 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Danial Thom Message-ID: <20051225011251.GC1367@flame.pc> References: <200512240746.15029.ringworm01@gmail.com> <20051224171614.75489.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051224171614.75489.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: "Michael C. Shultz" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:14:04 -0000 On 2005-12-24 09:16, Danial Thom wrote: >"Michael C. Shultz" wrote: >>On Saturday 24 December 2005 07:34, Danial Thom wrote: >>> FreeBSD and Linux *should* focus on server functions, >>> because that is where MS is weak and that is where its >>> needed. There will likely never be a solid reason to use >>> BSD or linux as a desktop other than religion; while there >>> are many compelling reasons to use BSD and/or linux >>> servers. >> >> Your opinion. Mine is FreeBSD has the potential to be a >> better desktop than either ms or Linux. The big problem at >> the moment is with web browser plugins. Desktop users coming >> from ms land demand these and FreeBSD simply comes up short >> in supporting them. I have faith that will change >> eventually. > > You're pretty much admitting here that FreeBSD desktop is not > as functional as windows. Which was exactly the point I was > making. No, he's admitting that there is one feature of Windows that some users may miss when they transition to FreeBSD. I can ennumerate at least two that FreeBSD users sorely miss when they are forced to work on Windows too. > FreeBSD has the "potential" to be a very good MP OS. Currently > it is not, so I don't use it. I need to run a business. > "Potential" only means that I monitor its progress; I "use" > what is the best available at the time for any given function. Good for you :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 01:16:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F0C16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:16:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjw@dynode.net) Received: from union.dynode.net (ppp173-2.lns1.per1.internode.on.net [150.101.173.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC8943D49 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:16:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjw@dynode.net) Received: from main.dynode.net (main.dynode.net [192.168.0.11]) by union.dynode.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBP1MCrj044715 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:22:12 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from rjw@main.dynode.net) Received: from main.dynode.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by main.dynode.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBP1DWWg024442 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:13:32 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from rjw@main.dynode.net) Received: (from rjw@localhost) by main.dynode.net (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jBP1DWQI024441 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:13:32 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from rjw) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:13:32 +0800 From: "Russell J. Wood" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051225011332.GA24395@main.dynode.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <01a001c6086d$8c0d57e0$210110ac@fortunato> <20051224144330.GA21970@main.dynode.net> <029b01c6089e$e3c8f210$210110ac@fortunato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <029b01c6089e$e3c8f210$210110ac@fortunato> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: USB mice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:16:40 -0000 On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 09:29:53AM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Russell J. Wood" > To: > Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 8:43 AM > Subject: Re: USB mice > > > >On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:36:28AM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote: > >>It seems to me that the way FreeBSD is catching up with new hardware > >>leaves > >>you unsatisfied. One has to choose, upon boot, the option to use an USB > >>keyboard by hand, and I have found no way to make a USB mouse to work. > >>The > >>OS broadly supports serial mice and hardly PS/2 mice, both almost out of > >>the market nowadays. Are USB mice supported by FreeBSD? > > > >I have a USB keyboard and I don't have to choose the ``USB Keyboard'' > >option at start up. Also, I have a USB Mouse hooked up via a hub in my > >keyboard. Works fine. > > Are they, your keyboard and your mouse, wireless? > > Teilhard. No, they are not. However, before this setup I was using a complete wireless setup. Logictec keyboard/mouse combination, from memory. - Russell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 01:23:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040E716A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:23:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B2243D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:23:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a021.otenet.gr [212.205.215.21]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id jBP1MuqZ016855; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:23:04 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 35F82116C5; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:21:43 +0200 (EET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:21:43 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Danial Thom Message-ID: <20051225012143.GD1367@flame.pc> References: <200512241219.12940.don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu> <20051224220153.82566.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051224220153.82566.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Miguel Saturnino , Don Hinton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:23:12 -0000 On 2005-12-24 14:01, Danial Thom wrote: > Don Hinton wrote: > > For me, FreeBSD is about twice as fast/easy to install/configure, > > and infinitely cheaper. > > Considering that WinXP usually comes on the computer, I don't see how > "installing and configuring FreeBSD" can be easier than having to do > nothing at all? Windows XP comes preinstalled, yes. Not "preconfigured" too. It so happens that configuring a Windows XP system to match one's preferences has the potential to: a) Screw the machine up so completely and utterly that a reinstall is required. b) Take a lot of time. A huge lot of time, because of all the different 'driver' installation processes. On 2005-12-24 14:01, Danial Thom wrote: > Don Hinton wrote: > > > 2) General productivity advantages in a typical day. ie: what can > > > you do with FreeBSD that you can't do in WinXP, and what is faster > > > or more productive in FreeBSD > > > > Depends on what you use it for. I'm a C++ developer, and have a > > need to examine/search/manipulate text files quite often, Windows, > > out of the box, is inappropriate for this type of work. I'd have to > > install all sorts of applications, e.g., cygwin, et al, to get the > > applications/capabilities that come "out of the box" on a typical > > *nix system, FreeBSD, Linux, etc... > > > > I'm a developer also, but I don't use the FreeBSD desktop for this, I > log into my freeBSD server with my desktop browser or telnet/ssh. I > don't see how such things are relevent to using one desktop over the > other. Why should you have to use remote SSH to a second system, when you can just pop up an xterm and instantly have all the power of the tools you actually *do* use today too? > I don't expect you to care, but saying you "prefer FreeBSD" and saying > "FreeBSD is better" are different animals. I just wanted to know what > you could do with FreeBSD that you can't do with Windows. I already > know what I can do with Windows that I can't do with FreeBSD. There are a lot of things that can be done with FreeBSD, which are practically impossible or very confusing in Windows. Then there's also the stability issue :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 02:01:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF19816A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:01:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606B943D5A for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:01:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBP20rx4017152; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:00:53 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, danial_thom@yahoo.com Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:01:28 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051224225721.17983.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051224225721.17983.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512241801.28350.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: rod person Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:01:34 -0000 On Saturday 24 December 2005 02:57 pm, Danial Thom wrote: > --- rod person wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:01:53 -0800 (PST) > > > > Danial Thom wrote: > > > I don't expect you to care, but saying you > > > "prefer FreeBSD" and saying "FreeBSD is > > > > better" > > > > > are different animals. I just wanted to know > > > > what > > > > > you could do with FreeBSD that you can't do > > > > with > > > > > Windows. I already know what I can do with > > > Windows that I can't do with FreeBSD. > > > > I didn't see the first few emails in this > > thread so excuse me > > if you have answered this, but what can you do > > on Windows > > that you can't do on FreeBSD. Other than play > > the latest and > > greatest games. I'm just wondering. > > Schwab Streetsmart > Accounting Software (CA) > Quicken > Photoshop > Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs) There are a couple of others. I use Adobe GoLive and haven't found an=20 equivalent. I could do some of the stuff better with a text editor but=20 when I use GoLive, the whole update would be finished before I was=20 hardly started using a text editor on FreeBSD. There is also the problem that some sites are designed to work with=20 Internet Explorer. You can try to visit with firefox but that doesn't=20 always work even with firefox on XP. We are still running flash-6 and 7=20 is in the works but I think that they have already announced that it=20 has security problems. The fixed multimedia products are always=20 released on Windows and it takes a while for them to get arount to the=20 other OSes. You only have to look at the people recently with problems=20 getting plugins to work on FreeBSD. You won't have any problem getting=20 them to run on XP. They probably wouldn't work properly on Linux=20 either. Now, I wouldn't use Outlook Express unless I was still working and the=20 company demanded it. I am happy using kmail and thunderbird. But I=20 forward some to my internal XP account because the graphics don't work=20 properly with my setup. =46or a while, I was updating FreeBSD to add security fixes as much as I=20 did my Windows 2K server. Both normally run for months without being=20 rebooted. The OSes usually overlap and as long as I have choices available, I=20 won't have to force a project onto an OS when it is really simple to=20 add it to the one other OSes. That is the advantage of a heterogeneous=20 computing environment. Projects just automagically move onto the OS=20 where it is easiest to work on them. Kent =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 02:02:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FAC16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:02:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B5F43D69 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:02:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a021.otenet.gr [212.205.215.21]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id jBP22A08013753 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:02:10 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DB4C6116A9; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:01:00 +0200 (EET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:01:00 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051225020100.GA2613@flame.pc> References: <01a001c6086d$8c0d57e0$210110ac@fortunato> <20051224144330.GA21970@main.dynode.net> <029b01c6089e$e3c8f210$210110ac@fortunato> <20051225011332.GA24395@main.dynode.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051225011332.GA24395@main.dynode.net> Subject: Re: USB mice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:02:23 -0000 On 2005-12-25 09:13, "Russell J. Wood" wrote: >On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 09:29:53AM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote: >>Russell J. Wood" wrote: >>>On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:36:28AM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote: >>>> It seems to me that the way FreeBSD is catching up with new >>>> hardware leaves you unsatisfied. One has to choose, upon boot, the >>>> option to use an USB keyboard by hand, and I have found no way to >>>> make a USB mouse to work. The OS broadly supports serial mice and >>>> hardly PS/2 mice, both almost out of the market nowadays. Are USB >>>> mice supported by FreeBSD? >>> >>> I have a USB keyboard and I don't have to choose the ``USB >>> Keyboard'' option at start up. Also, I have a USB Mouse hooked up >>> via a hub in my keyboard. Works fine. >> >> Are they, your keyboard and your mouse, wireless? > > No, they are not. However, before this setup I was using a complete > wireless setup. Logictec keyboard/mouse combination, from memory. USB mice are supported, but I'm not sure about install time. I very rarely install from a CD-ROM these days and even when I do, I don't use the mouse at all. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 02:08:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED0616A420 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:08:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjw@dynode.net) Received: from union.dynode.net (ppp173-2.lns1.per1.internode.on.net [150.101.173.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A401043D4C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:08:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjw@dynode.net) Received: from main.dynode.net (main.dynode.net [192.168.0.11]) by union.dynode.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBP2DvuD044828 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:13:57 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from rjw@main.dynode.net) Received: from main.dynode.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by main.dynode.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBP25IUd025154 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:05:18 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from rjw@main.dynode.net) Received: (from rjw@localhost) by main.dynode.net (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jBP25Id5025153 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:05:18 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from rjw) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:05:18 +0800 From: "Russell J. Wood" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051225020518.GA25108@main.dynode.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <01a001c6086d$8c0d57e0$210110ac@fortunato> <20051224144330.GA21970@main.dynode.net> <029b01c6089e$e3c8f210$210110ac@fortunato> <20051225011332.GA24395@main.dynode.net> <20051225020100.GA2613@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051225020100.GA2613@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: USB mice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:08:16 -0000 On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 04:01:00AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-12-25 09:13, "Russell J. Wood" wrote: > >On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 09:29:53AM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote: > >>Russell J. Wood" wrote: > >>>On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:36:28AM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote: > >>>> It seems to me that the way FreeBSD is catching up with new > >>>> hardware leaves you unsatisfied. One has to choose, upon boot, the > >>>> option to use an USB keyboard by hand, and I have found no way to > >>>> make a USB mouse to work. The OS broadly supports serial mice and > >>>> hardly PS/2 mice, both almost out of the market nowadays. Are USB > >>>> mice supported by FreeBSD? > >>> > >>> I have a USB keyboard and I don't have to choose the ``USB > >>> Keyboard'' option at start up. Also, I have a USB Mouse hooked up > >>> via a hub in my keyboard. Works fine. > >> > >> Are they, your keyboard and your mouse, wireless? > > > > No, they are not. However, before this setup I was using a complete > > wireless setup. Logictec keyboard/mouse combination, from memory. > > USB mice are supported, but I'm not sure about install time. I very > rarely install from a CD-ROM these days and even when I do, I don't use > the mouse at all. Who needs a mouse at install time? The keyboard is suffice. - Russell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 02:22:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5B516A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:22:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from m21.unixathome.org (m21.unixathome.org [205.150.199.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3624243D55 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:22:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [205.150.199.217]) by m21.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8DCC36E; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from m21.unixathome.org ([205.150.199.217]) by localhost (m21.unixathome.org [205.150.199.217]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04586-08; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [70.26.229.230]) by m21.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1B1BF58; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.55.0.99] (wocker.unixathome.org [10.55.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292CE3D3B; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:20 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" To: Ariff Abdullah Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <43ADBC0C.23308.5673D21@dan.langille.org> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20051225025934.2455a5a3.skywizard@MyBSD.org.my> References: <43AD4124.6711.387213B@dan.langille.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.31) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unixathome.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6: routing on the local LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:22:26 -0000 On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500 > "Dan Langille" wrote: > > Gidday folks, > > > > I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway. > > > > I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The tunnel is > > > > setup and working. From my gateway I can access various IPv6 > > websites (e.g http://www.kame.net). I have enabled rtadvd(8) on my > > gateway. For the netstat, ifconfig, etc, see [1]. > > > > >From a computer inside my gateway, I cannot ping anything, not even > > > > > the gateway. I suspect it's because the routing tables are not > > being set up on the gateway. I expected the system to do that > > automatically. I also expected fxp0 to get an IPv6 address out of > > this. Did I guess wrong? I suspect that if I can get fxp0 on the > > gateway, all will be well. If not, I think Ineed to set up static > > routes. > > Add a single 2001:470:1F00:1979::/64 address each for both fxp0/1. You > don't even need rtadv.conf :) > > rc.conf:- > ipv6_ifconfig_fxp0="2001:470:1F00:1979::1/64" > ipv6_ifconfig_fxp1="2001:470:1F00:1979::2/64" Thanks. I wanted to run rtadvd for the boxes inside the LAN. That ensure they get an address in the right range (AFAIK). Now... I just have to find someone with services, such as cvsup, available only over IPv6.... But what I've been reading indicates that cvsup is not IPv6 aware. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 02:42:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB07E16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:42:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy_sjostrom@yahoo.com) Received: from web31312.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31312.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1010443D4C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:42:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy_sjostrom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 48521 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Dec 2005 02:42:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Gp1lhBQX0Jyvs3qR7PYhj2TXc+syNNXayaZGnirzu1DsvN5naFBVpr2hqQEZlMQYzrmMup+b1LLgdhLbNPeE8NnW92fiWpTyEYSNFdy+uELWxQ1FnOdJoerHBSP3EFhzxJhmj3rtwTFmR624QzoXysvQsMM5QWvEBDU0Rk/dfXc= ; Message-ID: <20051225024257.48519.qmail@web31312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.223.241.58] by web31312.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:42:57 PST Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:42:57 -0800 (PST) From: Andy Sjostrom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051225010756.GB1367@flame.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:42:58 -0000 People please, I did not come in search of a debate as to which OS was better. I came in Search of a newer or if you will, another choice in an OS. Two OS's which have been pointed out to me and look very promising are. 1. PC BSD 2. ALinux Both offer a lot, and I know as many people do that there is on one single OS that offers the perfect solution for everything. However I also know now something I did not know 24 hours ago. and that was that there are a wide range of choices that are availible and contrey to popular belief not all BSD and linux OS's are created the same. I also know now that William Gate is single individual who believes that the word "team" has an "I" in it some place. Something that BSD & Linux knows does not exsist. After what William Gates and his Windows have put me through over the last three years. You can be sure that which ever OS choose will be desined by a "TEAM" and not by some knit wit that works for team Gates. Now can someone put me in touch with The Insane clown Posie. I have a project in mind...LOL! Merry christmas to all and thank you for your help. . D&A Consultants George A. Sjostrom II Helping those who can help them selves http://www.geocities.com/andy_sjostrom/index.html __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 02:44:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA38016A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:44:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@apriori.net) Received: from modena360.cwihosting.com (modena360.cwihosting.com [209.18.76.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E25443D67 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:44:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@apriori.net) Received: from apriori by modena360.cwihosting.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EqLrh-0007TX-1O for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:44:05 -0500 From: "Your Name" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.27 X-IPAddress: 127.0.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:44:05 -0500 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - modena360.cwihosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [688 689] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - apriori.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: gtk2-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm not available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:44:09 -0000 Greetings - I was attempting to load a few ports over the past couple of days and kept running into this problem with gtk2-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm. (Running FBSD 5.4) Earlier today, I tried loading the pips-sc60s driver. (/usr/ports/print/pips-sc60s) This driver (if I had been succesful installing it) would have permitted me to use my Epson C60 printer. Installation of the pips-sc60s driver failed. For reasons I don't understand, this port tries to install linuxpluginwrapper, linux-flashplugin6, linux-realplayer... (?) The whole process failed: => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/gtk2-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/linux-realplayer. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/pips-sc60s. Later, I tried installing flashpluinwrapper and linuxpluginwrapper (at different times to see if I could manually get these dependencies resolved, deinstalling the dregs of one before attempting the installation of the other) in an attempt to get RealPlayer running on my system. I received a similar failure message: => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/gtk2-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/linux-realplayer. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper. --- My /var/db/pkg area thinks that I have the following installed: gtk-1.2.10_12 gtk-2.6.4_1 So I don't know why those apps seem to need gtk2-2.2.1-4 when 2.6.4.1 is already installed. And I don't understand why these bits of software will not install properly. Suggestions appreciated. -- paz. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 02:50:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C62516A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@apriori.net) Received: from modena360.cwihosting.com (modena360.cwihosting.com [209.18.76.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE03F43D53 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:50:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@apriori.net) Received: from apriori by modena360.cwihosting.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EqLyM-0008Qz-4o for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:50:58 -0500 From: "Your Name" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.27 X-IPAddress: 127.0.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:50:58 -0500 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - modena360.cwihosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [688 689] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - apriori.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: USB/multi-wheel mice conf files if anyone wants them X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:50:59 -0000 In case it is of any help to anyone, I recently got two of my mice running on FreeBSD 5.4 with Xorg, and I could post the Xorg conf files I ended up using. One of the mice is an A4Tech Optical GreatEye, which has two mice wheels. One is for up-and -down, the other wheel is for right-to-left manipulation. The other mouse is a Starlogic mini trackball (optical) mouse. It's small and has a small trackball on top instead of mice wheels. (Compaq markets basically the same design as the Starlogic.) This means that I can do the up-down or side-to-side scrolling with the trackball. It is such a pleasure to be using FreeBSD with these newer, optical mice with multiple scroll wheels (or the trackball). Cheers, -- paz. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 03:08:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D16C16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:08:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F9C43D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:08:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.100] (adsl-65-67-101-87.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.67.101.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0D0114331 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:06:40 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: USB/multi-wheel mice conf files if anyone wants them X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:08:28 -0000 --On December 24, 2005 9:50:58 PM -0500 Your Name wrote: > > In case it is of any help to anyone, I recently got two of my mice > running on FreeBSD 5.4 with Xorg, and I could post the Xorg conf files > I ended up using. > It will help. Please post them. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 03:39:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA22A16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:39:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brodhow@all2easy.net) Received: from mailserver.bvn.net (mailserver.bvn.net [209.60.252.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FE943D5D for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:39:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brodhow@all2easy.net) Received: from all2easy.net (unverified [67.136.139.175]) by all2ez.net (Rockliffe SMTPRA 5.3.11) with ESMTP id for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:43:19 -0800 Message-ID: <43ADC01D.5020401@all2easy.net> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:39:41 -0600 From: Howard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Linux and .tbz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:39:26 -0000 Is there a package install utility for FreeBSD's .tbz files that can be use on a Linux platform? And, can FreeBSD package apps run on Linux platforms? Sincerely Yours, Howard $4.95/mo. National Dialup, Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus, 5mb personal web space. 5x faster dialup for only $9.95/mo. No contracts, No fees, No Kidding! See http://www.All2Easy.net for more details! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 03:51:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB1116A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:51:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC86843D53 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:51:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBP3ox1Y021207; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:50:59 -0800 From: Frank Jahnke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: 20051224172453.0f080843@atomizer.opensourcebeef.net Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FMJ & Associates Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:46:08 -0800 Message-Id: <1135482368.20459.40.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@fmjassoc.com Cc: danial_thom@yahoo.com Subject: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jahnke@fmjassoc.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:51:09 -0000 >> I didn't see the first few emails in this >> thread so excuse me >> if you have answered this, but what can you do >> on Windows >> that you can't do on FreeBSD. Other than play >> the latest and >> greatest games. I'm just wondering. > Schwab Streetsmart > Accounting Software (CA) I don't know these, so I can't comment. > Quicken I run Quickbooks on an old 98SE box. I also use this machine for a proprietary program NIH now requires for electronic submission of grant applications. At the moment, it runs only on Windows. > Photoshop I don't need full Photoshop -- I use GIMP and NIH's ImageJ, which are good enough for my applications. These are very technical (mainly interpreting photomicrographs), and not putting cat or dog heads on images of people. Also, many versions of Photoshop (but not CS) run quite well under Wine. > Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs) I run this under Wine, and it works fine. Usually I create PDFs with ghostscript, but Acrobat is very useful for things like sorting or collating pre-existing PDF files, which I do need, and filling PDF forms. Then again, I use troff and TeX for text formatting, which most people don't. No question, the greatest strength of Windows is the huge amount of software available for it. EVERYTHING runs on Windows, and yes, you have to invest time in FreeBSD to get things to work right. Usually there is an acceptable work-around. Not always, but usually. While I don't use the Win98 box much, it is useful to have around. Since you can pick one of these up for $100 or so, I don't see this as a limitation if you prefer the Unix environment most of the time, which I do. One thing that FreeBSD (and Linux) offers is an extensive numerical analysis software (matrix inversions, Finite Element methods, graphical pre- and post-processors and statistical software) and decent free compilers that would cost a lot on Windows. That's very helpful for a cash-strapped start-up, like mine. Admittedly that is not the question the OP had. OTOH, the amount of money I've save on software has allowed me to hire someone to do more work in the lab. That's the most important thing for me. Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 04:01:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9739D16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:01:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carloscarnero@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6DD43D5A for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:01:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carloscarnero@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so910641nzo for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:01:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jjVzKw+gS1eJwffrwqIL2jBmPdOg+B8oGUr75oGK+m3+i1moq3tCfnlafQ1epZ/WEWcaCgNPlbWsRRAyTDNX4MVqllTGmLK1953gqCcAcDEHrHT7BEr2BmA/jUm6Fqn49oWMS12vBZ7uO6PiBgg51DvQnH44ep3R4Y1lBH0GWEg= Received: by 10.36.19.7 with SMTP id 7mr1729223nzs; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:01:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.251.50 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:01:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2cbf87d0512242001h37728f7ex1ed0387ccb09f59b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:01:06 -0400 From: "Carlos A. Carnero Delgado" To: Howard In-Reply-To: <43ADC01D.5020401@all2easy.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43ADC01D.5020401@all2easy.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux and .tbz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:01:07 -0000 Hi, On 12/24/05, Howard wrote: > Is there a package install utility for FreeBSD's .tbz files that can be > use on a Linux platform? well, you can expand that package file with bunzip2 and tar (is nothing more than a bzipped tarball.) > And, can FreeBSD package apps run on Linux platforms? Nope. > Howard Carlos -- grah windows just crashed again, unstable crap. Windows isn't unstable, it's just spontaneous. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 06:49:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DA516A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:49:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514B643D49 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:49:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so937197nzo for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:49:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=fsw+oOi5t8XGPssr4oreMR5d1s8ZJiujrNJiSW2MXU3QS8xrOoeQCX9a9iQqCDcEkL6a2oE4lSKVP5ER8YLe6JV8I/9xqZpPQ5iiuHm4Pvx36Z3Umg2rcN7oeAipm4Hiah0lmdaqh+00QAhYMy6CRQLoACTgjHff+/7KRx1rEgk= Received: by 10.36.50.8 with SMTP id x8mr1794262nzx; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:49:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208143.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.143]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 7sm1591781nzo.2005.12.24.22.49.18; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:49:19 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:52:01 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512251452.01352.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Subject: DTS decode with mplayer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:49:20 -0000 hello, all does anybody knows how to configure mplayer to decode DTS soundtrack while playing a DVDRip movie? recently more and more movies seem to use XViD+DTS technology. Any suggestion will be appreciated. thanks -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 07:05:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C049D16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:05:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skywizard@MyBSD.org.my) Received: from tomoyo.MyBSD.org.my (tomoyo.mybsd.org.my [202.157.186.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C476F43D46 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skywizard@MyBSD.org.my) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tomoyo.MyBSD.org.my (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F006CC2C; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:11:02 +0800 (MYT) Received: from tomoyo.MyBSD.org.my ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (TOMOYO.MYBSD.ORG.MY [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72758-02; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:11:01 +0800 (MYT) Received: from misaki (misaki.MyBSD.org.my [IPv6:2001:328:2002:aa2:2c0:9fff:fed9:9e1d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tomoyo.MyBSD.org.my (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CBB6CC29; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:11:00 +0800 (MYT) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:05:16 +0800 From: Ariff Abdullah To: "Dan Langille" Message-Id: <20051225150516.74155b06.skywizard@MyBSD.org.my> In-Reply-To: <43ADBC0C.23308.5673D21@dan.langille.org> References: <43AD4124.6711.387213B@dan.langille.org> <43ADBC0C.23308.5673D21@dan.langille.org> Organization: MyBSD X-Mailer: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/net/smtp.rb Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd AntiVirus & AntiSpam Scanner running on FreeBSD mailserver at TOMOYO.MYBSD.ORG.MY Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6: routing on the local LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:05:22 -0000 On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:20 -0500 "Dan Langille" wrote: > On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > > > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500 > > "Dan Langille" wrote: > > > Gidday folks, > > > > > > I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway. > > > > > > I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The > > > tunnel is > > > > > > setup and working. From my gateway I can access various IPv6 > > > websites (e.g http://www.kame.net). I have enabled rtadvd(8) on > > > my gateway. For the netstat, ifconfig, etc, see [1]. > > > > > > >From a computer inside my gateway, I cannot ping anything, not > > > >even > > > > > > > the gateway. I suspect it's because the routing tables are not > > > being set up on the gateway. I expected the system to do that > > > automatically. I also expected fxp0 to get an IPv6 address out > > > of this. Did I guess wrong? I suspect that if I can get fxp0 > > > on the gateway, all will be well. If not, I think Ineed to set > > > up static routes. > > > > Add a single 2001:470:1F00:1979::/64 address each for both fxp0/1. > > You don't even need rtadv.conf :) > > > > rc.conf:- > > ipv6_ifconfig_fxp0="2001:470:1F00:1979::1/64" > > ipv6_ifconfig_fxp1="2001:470:1F00:1979::2/64" > > Thanks. > > I wanted to run rtadvd for the boxes inside the LAN. That ensure > they get an address in the right range (AFAIK). > For this simple configuration, you don't even need rtadvd.conf. Adding anyprefix/64 address to router interface and running rtadvd -D router_interface will do the job. > Now... I just have to find someone with services, such as cvsup, > available only over IPv6.... But what I've been reading indicates > that cvsup is not IPv6 aware. > AFAIK we're out of luck for now. > -- Ariff Abdullah MyBSD http://www.MyBSD.org.my (IPv6/IPv4) http://staff.MyBSD.org.my (IPv6/IPv4) http://tomoyo.MyBSD.org.my (IPv6/IPv4) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 07:27:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A9B16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:27:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C5B43D60 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so940377nzo for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:27:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=OdkMBp9niOCjqoFta2OiF+z9LbbpNcB7EyejUHzyie6H68SNsP1TRwHcTzHoAyZrUDe0DzkzGTWHJuPGWAQu8BXlYMFLojWwoxidiYVLF4E2CNW7FaNYhb8/+2+sVvAprN/ttgxZFx0EsEsS3kA3FYZK/KjhFAQ7sQe2hHkFI+8= Received: by 10.36.39.6 with SMTP id m6mr817918nzm; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:27:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208143.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.143]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 18sm145006nzo.2005.12.24.23.27.42; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:27:44 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:30:21 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Subject: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:27:48 -0000 Hello, all Does anybody success to use wireless NIC in FreeBSD6.0 in HP NC6000? Back to FreeBSD 5.4, my wireless card just works, but not in FreeBSD 6.0. I use the following steps to try to use my wireless card: 1.change to root, then "kldload if_ath" after this, I can use "kldstat" to see this: Id Refs Address Size Name 1 9 0xc0400000 328db0 kernel 2 1 0xc0729000 bc40 kqemu.ko 3 16 0xc0735000 5683c acpi.ko 6 1 0xc296a000 e000 if_ath.ko 7 1 0xc2978000 3000 ath_rate.ko 8 1 0xc297b000 24000 ath_hal.ko and use "ifconfig" to see this: bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1a inet 166.111.208.143 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ath0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier ssid "" channel 1 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100 protmode CTS 2.I use DHCP to get my IP address. "dhclient ath0" the response is this: DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPACK from 166.111.208.1 bound to 166.111.208.137 -- renewal in 3600 seconds. and use "ifconfig" can see: ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) status: associated ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 it seems that the wireless NIC should be working now, right? but when i try to ping some IP which definitely should be connected from the IP address I have got, like : ping 166.111.8.28 (this is the DNS server) the result is this: PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ping: send to: No route to host ^C --- 166.111.8.28 ping statistics --- 17 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss it means I cannot connect to the internet even when I have got the wireless card an IP address using DHCP. WHY? can anybody help on this? any suggestion would be much appreciated. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 07:45:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8B716A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:45:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2102A43D46 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:45:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 15158 invoked by uid 510); 25 Dec 2005 07:47:40 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.685942 secs); 25 Dec 2005 07:47:40 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.685942 secs Process 15151) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 25 Dec 2005 07:47:38 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1135496858.14764.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:47:38 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: gtk2-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm not available X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:45:32 -0000 On Sun, 2005-12-25 at 02:44, Your Name wrote: > Greetings - > > I was attempting to load a few ports over the past couple of days and > kept running into this problem with gtk2-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm. > > (Running FBSD 5.4) > > Earlier today, I tried loading the pips-sc60s driver. > (/usr/ports/print/pips-sc60s) This driver (if I had been succesful > installing it) would have permitted me to use my Epson C60 printer. > Installation of the pips-sc60s driver failed. For reasons I don't > understand, this port tries to install linuxpluginwrapper, > linux-flashplugin6, linux-realplayer... (?) The whole process failed: > > => Attempting to fetch from > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/. > fetch: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/gtk2-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/linux-realplayer. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/pips-sc60s. > > > > Later, I tried installing flashpluinwrapper and linuxpluginwrapper (at > different times to see if I could manually get these dependencies > resolved, deinstalling the dregs of one before attempting the > installation of the other) in an attempt to get RealPlayer running on > my system. I received a similar failure message: > > => Attempting to fetch from > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/. > fetch: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/gtk2-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/linux-realplayer. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper. > > --- > > My /var/db/pkg area thinks that I have the following installed: > gtk-1.2.10_12 > gtk-2.6.4_1 > > So I don't know why those apps seem to need gtk2-2.2.1-4 when 2.6.4.1 > is already installed. And I don't understand why these bits of > software will not install properly. > > Suggestions appreciated. > -- paz. Paz, As you say gtk 2-2.2 is out of date and has been superseded which is why you can't download it because it is not in the ports. According to: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=pips&stype=all&sektion=all Pips in now pips-sc60s-2.5.2_1 which requires gtk-1.2.10_13. Are your ports up to date? try doing a CVSup. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 08:10:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3173A16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B637543D53 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:10:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4495585 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89205-09 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:10:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4781F5588; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051225081003.4781F5588@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2005-12-04 - 2005-12-24 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:10:21 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 22-Dec : Configuring IPsec on your XP Professional laptop You've done your FreeBSD, now do your XP http://freebsddiary.org/ipsec-wireless-xp.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 09:33:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0784D16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:33:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B09D43D5C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.52]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051225093331.SLKX14388.mta9.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net> for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:33:31 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D951FB5E5; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:33:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:33:38 -0500 From: Parv To: f-q Message-ID: <20051225093338.GA2097@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: f-q Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Usage/Context of PPP_(DEFLATE|BSDCOMP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:33:33 -0000 I see that PPP_FILTER kernel option is mentioned in pppd(8) man page. Could somebody tell me how & where PPP_DEFLATE & PPP_BSDCOMP options are used, or where can i find information on them? If it matters i am using FreeBSD 5-stable/i386. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 09:50:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38AE16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:50:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from niklas.nielsen@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB05543D53 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:50:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from niklas.nielsen@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l36so344251nfa for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:50:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bobv/ZfnEO5u8L5utbEMmmbeyJh0G/TjX0B1Kl/5eIXK++6gBEL14BzLdAn9l5EjyxuQWv1QMInd0hR+PoBATputjRbOt7i0yKo31PiQb/qAdNjR3hnlVo0UQbo5ps4C+54j3MTPW3NeXCPD6BQWdOVW2qrro6D/kCL28EtAQsg= Received: by 10.48.250.8 with SMTP id x8mr199899nfh; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:50:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.250.20 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:50:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <87e39e8b0512250150w3cc50036ucfa0b4d7efd66e44@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:50:09 +0100 From: Niklas Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <43ADD649.1030006@netspace.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200512241148.11674.plcplc@gmail.com> <43ADD649.1030006@netspace.net.au> Subject: Re: umass detected, but da is never created X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:50:11 -0000 I have an iPod shuffle and expirences the same problem - no cabling is envolved, its a kind of USB stick. And I know that the iPod worked in 5.4, so I highly doubt hardware issues. And to Philip - I'll give a beer at the local pub if you post a patch ;) Best regards Niklas Nielsen On 12/25/05, Rowdy wrote: > Philip Lykke Carlsen wrote: > > I have this external harddisk kit, and when I plug it in, the system > > correctly recognizes it as a umass.. but afterwards, the da device is > > never created.. > > > > this is what I get from the console: > > > > umass0: vendor 0x05e3 USB TO IDE, rev 2.00/0.33, addr 2 umass0: BBB > > reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, TIMEOUT > > > > > > Also, the very same thing but the timeouts are happening if I connect > > an Apple iPod.. > > > > And for the record, I had this problem with both the generic and my > > custom kernel.. both with umass,da,ses,pass compiled in.. > > > > Any ideas as for how to solve this? Any guidelines and I'd gladly > > edit the files in question and submit a patch, when I get it > > working.. > > > > PS, Any other usb-drive I've tried has worked without problems.. > > Greetings, > > I have an external USB enclosure into which I can plug either of two IDE > hard drives, each in a separate caddy. One works perfectly, the other > produces something very similar to the above error fairly consistently, > and triggers reboots of the FreeBSD (5.3) box when the enclosure is > plugged in or out with the 'broken' caddy inserted. > > After some experimentation and close examination, it appears that the > cable inside the 'broken' caddy may have been slightly damaged. > Manipulating the cable (squashing it down into the caddy so the sliding > caddy lid does not scrape against it) appears to go some way towards > solving the problem. > > So in my case I would say that it was a hardware (cabling) problem > within the caddy, and thus within the USB enclosure. > > Other USB devices, including the second caddy and a couple of flash > drives, seem to work fine. > > Rowdy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 10:11:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70E616A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:11:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10D543D60 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:11:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 16231 invoked from network); 25 Dec 2005 10:11:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO TP51.local) ([pbs]775067@[217.187.174.105]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Dec 2005 10:11:10 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:10:51 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: Yuan Jue Message-ID: <20051225111051.06a02712@TP51.local> In-Reply-To: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_9pApPfj9ib9XOUhn6/5bE6A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:11:14 -0000 --Sig_9pApPfj9ib9XOUhn6/5bE6A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yuan Jue wrote: > Does anybody success to use wireless NIC in FreeBSD6.0 in HP NC6000? > Back to FreeBSD 5.4, my wireless card just works, but not in FreeBSD > 6.0. >=20 > I use the following steps to try to use my wireless card: > 1.change to root, then "kldload if_ath" > after this, I can use "kldstat" to see this: > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 9 0xc0400000 328db0 kernel > 2 1 0xc0729000 bc40 kqemu.ko > 3 16 0xc0735000 5683c acpi.ko > 6 1 0xc296a000 e000 if_ath.ko > 7 1 0xc2978000 3000 ath_rate.ko > 8 1 0xc297b000 24000 ath_hal.ko > and use "ifconfig" to see this: > bge0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > options=3D1a > inet 166.111.208.143 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast > 166.111.209.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > lo0: flags=3D8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > ath0: flags=3D8802 mtu 1500 > ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect > status: no carrier > ssid "" channel 1 > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100 protmode CTS >=20 > 2.I use DHCP to get my IP address. "dhclient ath0" > the response is this: > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > DHCPACK from 166.111.208.1 > bound to 166.111.208.137 -- renewal in 3600 seconds. > and use "ifconfig" can see: > ath0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast > 166.111.209.255 ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) > status: associated > ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 >=20 > it seems that the wireless NIC should be working now, right? > but when i try to ping some IP which definitely should be connected > from the IP address I have got, like : > ping 166.111.8.28 (this is the DNS server) > the result is this: > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ping: send to: No route to host > ^C > --- 166.111.8.28 ping statistics --- > 17 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss >=20 What does netstat -r say? Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_9pApPfj9ib9XOUhn6/5bE6A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDrnA0jV8GA4rMKUQRAqsHAJoCCAC/pAredzRXnMxNkytTdrff9wCgulTR XzlUBLjKQWoMwa0RncmZYqE= =nyO2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_9pApPfj9ib9XOUhn6/5bE6A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 10:24:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E407B16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:24:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@xinus.net) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3F543D60 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:24:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@xinus.net) Received: from wizard.xinus.net (wizard.xinus.net [82.227.42.60]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437984E6CB for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:24:54 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 99004 invoked by uid 98); 25 Dec 2005 10:24:31 -0000 Received: from 192.168.0.1 by wizard.xinus.net (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (Everything is here, f-prot and spamassassin. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.1):. Processed in 0.164609 secs); 25 Dec 2005 10:24:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (192.168.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 25 Dec 2005 10:24:30 -0000 Message-ID: <43AE7377.603@xinus.net> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:24:55 +0100 From: David DU SERRE TELMON User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NATd issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:24:56 -0000 Hi, I've the network below : 192.168.2.0/23 | 192.168.3.454 FreeBSD x.x.x.x router 1 (dialup) | Internet | y.y.y.y FreeBSD 10.0.0.254 router 2 | 10.0.0.0/24 Each gateway run racoon. Each network can go on Internet. VPN is ok. I would like to NAT packets from 192.168.2.0/23 to 10.0.0.0/24 with IP 192.168.3.254 on router 1 (or 10.0.0.254 if it's possible). VPN interface is gif5 on router 1. My ipfw rules : dialup:~# ipfw show | grep 8670 00650 4 400 divert 8670 ip from 192.168.2.0/23 to 10.0.0.0/24 00660 4 400 divert 8670 ip from 10.0.0.0/24 natd in debug mode : dialup:~# natd -v -p natd-vpn -interface gif5 natd[42308]: Aliasing to 192.168.3.254, mtu 1280 bytes In [ICMP] [ICMP] 192.168.3.82 -> 10.0.0.1 8(0) aliased to [ICMP] 192.168.3.82 -> 10.0.0.1 8(0) Out [ICMP] [ICMP] 10.0.0.1 -> 192.168.3.82 0(0) aliased to [ICMP] 10.0.0.1 -> 192.168.3.82 0(0) gif5 is the vpn tunnel interface dialup:~# ifconfig gif5 gif5: flags=8051 mtu 1280 tunnel inet x.x.x.x --> y.y.y.y inet 192.168.3.254 --> 10.0.0.254 netmask 0xffffffff As you can see, packets are not translated with IP 192.168.3.54. Same result with natd -p natd-vpn -a 192.168.3.254. I think the solution will be with -reverse, when I use it, packets are natd (ping from 192.168.3.61 to 10.0.0.1) : dialup:/etc# natd -v -p natd-vpn -reverse -interface gif5 natd[43271]: Aliasing to 192.168.3.254, mtu 1280 bytes In [ICMP] [ICMP] 192.168.3.61 -> 10.0.0.1 8(0) aliased to [ICMP] 192.168.3.254 -> 10.0.0.1 8(0) tcmpdump on remote gateway : 11:26:44.641090 IP 192.168.3.254 > 10.0.0.1: icmp 64: echo request seq 0 11:26:44.641240 IP 10.0.0.1 > 192.168.3.254: icmp 64: echo reply seq 0 But I haven't got any reply on localsite (192.168.2.0/23), I haven't got packet OUT on natd. David. Thanks ! Have a nice Christmas ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 10:30:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8837916A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:30:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A4143D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:30:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so947369nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:30:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IMzcFt4VcLdUUM9cQrYOBjCeGbTYjLXLkr/CDBcv3/Z+AXIXHEPsmmto2zR4aXMfWsmrjk8KV9nyD0dXMytWXB01h1/BMw+NlkK8gGRhS6VmPu7dZy6EJXZydPGX/b3sGhvRyualO1JjXKUDMQNyhzrmb0g1DcDB/fnokwpn4KA= Received: by 10.36.67.9 with SMTP id p9mr2016829nza; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:30:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:30:44 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Yuan Jue In-Reply-To: <200512251452.01352.yuanjue02@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200512251452.01352.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DTS decode with mplayer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:30:45 -0000 On 12/25/05, Yuan Jue wrote: > hello, all > > does anybody knows how to configure mplayer to decode DTS soundtrack > while playing a DVDRip movie? recently more and more movies seem to use > XViD+DTS technology. > > Any suggestion will be appreciated. thanks > > -- > Best Regards. > Yuan Jue > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > DTS is absolutely great in comparison to AC3. But to fully appreciate all of its benefits you're gonna need a hardware DTS decoder I've got this one and it sounds terrific: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00009N8TC/ Non-commercial software DTS decoding is far behind its Dolby counterpart. You can set "WITH_DTS=3Dyes" and rebuild mplayer to be able to (try and) play those movies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 10:30:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606C716A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:30:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs2.arnes.si (avs2.arnes.si [193.2.1.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B1243D55 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:30:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs2.arnes.si [193.2.1.75]) by avs2.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095232459DD for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:30:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs2.arnes.si ([193.2.1.75]) by localhost (avs2.arnes.si [193.2.1.75]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44669-07 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:30:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs2.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id B155D2459C5 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:30:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] (master.workgroup [192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBPAUf9J021995 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:30:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:30:50 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: FreeBSD Q ML Message-ID: <3A283EEDF2706ED6C7793233@[192.168.10.249]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Subject: Changing hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:30:46 -0000 Hi! I have curently my server on Asus A7N266-VM with Duron 900 and 632 MB RAM, nic 3c905B-TX. I want to migrate to an Compaq with Intel 810 chipset and P3 667. I am thinking to move HDD to compaq, plain and simple. Is it enough to just change configuration for the NIC because in compaq is Intel pro/100vm and the server should function properly or do I need to make new server from the scratch. Regards, -- Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 10:33:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5F016A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:33:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7737C43D58 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:33:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so947599nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:33:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-disposition:date:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=mLubztq8nS3X7fPi3FDk0g9l8uelDsNVB5FnwuOSrNox3gIp5VjEwwYrmZUik/SQRQ8uZpa/mupsqronBMdimQf06qBgJukSZ8Frf6l2HSUa6S7RaXfWbgcOjoPrJ5G0eLac9npG6jWS1VQ6qoNmUB3PCD5FQziZMqSobUbUx7I= Received: by 10.36.19.7 with SMTP id 7mr2020309nzs; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:33:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208204.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.204]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 34sm3181008nza.2005.12.25.02.33.26; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:33:29 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Fabian Keil User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <20051225111051.06a02712@TP51.local> In-Reply-To: <20051225111051.06a02712@TP51.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:36:10 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512251836.10527.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:33:31 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 18:10, you wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > Does anybody success to use wireless NIC in FreeBSD6.0 in HP NC6000? > > Back to FreeBSD 5.4, my wireless card just works, but not in FreeBSD > > 6.0. > > > > I use the following steps to try to use my wireless card: > > 1.change to root, then "kldload if_ath" > > after this, I can use "kldstat" to see this: > > Id Refs Address Size Name > > 1 9 0xc0400000 328db0 kernel > > 2 1 0xc0729000 bc40 kqemu.ko > > 3 16 0xc0735000 5683c acpi.ko > > 6 1 0xc296a000 e000 if_ath.ko > > 7 1 0xc2978000 3000 ath_rate.ko > > 8 1 0xc297b000 24000 ath_hal.ko > > and use "ifconfig" to see this: > > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=1a > > inet 166.111.208.143 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast > > 166.111.209.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > ath0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > > ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect > > status: no carrier > > ssid "" channel 1 > > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100 protmode CTS > > > > 2.I use DHCP to get my IP address. "dhclient ath0" > > the response is this: > > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > > DHCPREQUEST on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > > DHCPACK from 166.111.208.1 > > bound to 166.111.208.137 -- renewal in 3600 seconds. > > and use "ifconfig" can see: > > ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast > > 166.111.209.255 ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) > > status: associated > > ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 > > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 > > > > it seems that the wireless NIC should be working now, right? > > but when i try to ping some IP which definitely should be connected > > from the IP address I have got, like : > > ping 166.111.8.28 (this is the DNS server) > > the result is this: > > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ping: send to: No route to host > > ^C > > --- 166.111.8.28 ping statistics --- > > 17 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > What does netstat -r say? YuanJue# netstat -r Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire ^C YuanJue# thanks for the reply. what should I do now? -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 10:49:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF50B16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7978143D5D for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from echobase.hoth.dk (echobase.hoth.dk [80.62.210.27]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2CE5EE04E for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:49:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by echobase.hoth.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0051219B3D; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:49:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:49:36 +0100 From: "Martin P. Hansen" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051225104936.GA53795@echobase.hoth.dk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3A283EEDF2706ED6C7793233@[192.168.10.249]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3A283EEDF2706ED6C7793233@[192.168.10.249]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Changing hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:49:39 -0000 On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Sasa Stupar wrote: > I have curently my server on Asus A7N266-VM with Duron 900 and 632 MB RAM, > nic 3c905B-TX. I want to migrate to an Compaq with Intel 810 chipset and P3 > 667. I am thinking to move HDD to compaq, plain and simple. Is it enough to > just change configuration for the NIC because in compaq is Intel pro/100vm > and the server should function properly or do I need to make new server > from the scratch. Unless you have a very customized KERNELCONF I don't see any problems with it, since it seems to be i386 architechture on both of the computers. I've never tried such migration myself, though. -- Martin P. Hansen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 11:19:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22AA16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:19:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs2.arnes.si (avs2.arnes.si [193.2.1.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142D043D49 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:19:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs2.arnes.si [193.2.1.75]) by avs2.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBB12459E2; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:19:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs2.arnes.si ([193.2.1.75]) by localhost (avs2.arnes.si [193.2.1.75]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47381-09; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:19:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs2.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B472459B9; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:19:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] (master.workgroup [192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBPBJHl0022239; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:19:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:19:25 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: "Martin P. Hansen" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20051225104936.GA53795@echobase.hoth.dk> References: <3A283EEDF2706ED6C7793233@[192.168.10.249]> <20051225104936.GA53795@echobase.hoth.dk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Cc: Subject: Re: Changing hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:19:19 -0000 --On 25. december 2005 11:49 +0100 "Martin P. Hansen" wrote: > On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Sasa Stupar wrote: >> I have curently my server on Asus A7N266-VM with Duron 900 and 632 MB >> RAM, nic 3c905B-TX. I want to migrate to an Compaq with Intel 810 >> chipset and P3 667. I am thinking to move HDD to compaq, plain and >> simple. Is it enough to just change configuration for the NIC because >> in compaq is Intel pro/100vm and the server should function properly or >> do I need to make new server from the scratch. > > Unless you have a very customized KERNELCONF I don't see any problems > with it, since it seems to be i386 architechture on both of the > computers. > > I've never tried such migration myself, though. Will try and let you know. -- Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 11:33:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEED16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB9343D46 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:33:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s1so353112nze for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:33:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=C+W/77qREz4cFVwngt2cWkx0s0pXITl/iIfSos3PQykcAsYWkG0fB3PV7pxJNYI4Fz3p/A9JnHf7AIFY8+GXvBqq5Lm5PwUyykLjSIYEHqDFp84tO3d6F1zBZ4o+is9MO5IBvwHSYYrtmnosDwq2er2xMSuTmzwjkVtgYd9KU/M= Received: by 10.36.138.7 with SMTP id l7mr2016266nzd; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:33:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208204.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.204]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id r1sm3601582nzd.2005.12.25.03.33.52; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:33:54 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: "Andrew P." Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:36:34 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512251452.01352.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512251936.34892.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DTS decode with mplayer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:33:56 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 18:30, you wrote: > On 12/25/05, Yuan Jue wrote: > > hello, all > > > > does anybody knows how to configure mplayer to decode DTS soundtrack > > while playing a DVDRip movie? recently more and more movies seem to use > > XViD+DTS technology. > > > > Any suggestion will be appreciated. thanks > > DTS is absolutely great in comparison to AC3. But to fully > appreciate all of its benefits you're gonna need a hardware > DTS decoder > > I've got this one and it sounds terrific: > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00009N8TC/ > > Non-commercial software DTS decoding is far behind its > Dolby counterpart. You can set "WITH_DTS=yes" and rebuild > mplayer to be able to (try and) play those movies. thanks very much. it does works. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 11:37:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7307216A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:37:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from el01043@mail.ntua.gr) Received: from mx-out-02.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D9943D4C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:37:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from el01043@mail.ntua.gr) Received: from mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-02.forthnet.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBPBbFTi016357 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:37:15 +0200 Received: from mx-in-01.forthnet.gr (mx-in-01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBPBbFdP008080 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:37:15 +0200 Received: from [192.168.254.1] (ppp28-adsl-13.ath.forthnet.gr [212.251.111.13]) by mx-in-01.forthnet.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBPBbE1v013307 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:37:15 +0200 Authentication-Results: mx-in-01.forthnet.gr from=el01043@mail.ntua.gr; sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral Message-ID: <43AE846A.8070203@mail.ntua.gr> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:37:14 +0200 From: Dimitris Tsamis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051219) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mozilla extensions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:37:19 -0000 I use Firefox and Thunderbird on FreeBSD and I have noticed that some of the extensions are available as ports, for example the adblock and enigmail extensions. I want to ask if there is a difference between installing the port and installing the extension from an xpi file. Especially for Thunderbird I see that the version available for FreeBSD on the official enigmail site is 0.89.6, whereas the port installs version 0.93.0. Why is that? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 11:53:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0746E16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:53:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5359C43D53 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:53:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.16.2.1] (unknown [172.16.2.1]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2CB2E047; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:53:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43AE884F.70002@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:53:51 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050909) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuan Jue References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:53:56 -0000 Yuan Jue wrote: > ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 > ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) > status: associated > ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 > > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > ping: send to: No route to host > it means I cannot connect to the internet even when I have got the > wireless card an IP address using DHCP. WHY? > > can anybody help on this? any suggestion would be much appreciated. Take a close look at the ip/broadcast of your nic and the ip of the host you're trying to ping. Your NIC: 166.111.208.137/23 Your DNS: 166.111.8.28 They are not on the same network as far as I can see. Now, check that you have the default route set, # route -n get default Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 11:55:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778BE16A420 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:55:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF91343D5A for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:55:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.16.2.1] (unknown [172.16.2.1]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDAF2E047; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:55:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43AE88B4.7060306@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:55:32 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050909) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AE884F.70002@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <43AE884F.70002@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Yuan Jue , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:55:34 -0000 Erik Nørgaard wrote: > Your NIC: 166.111.208.137/23 > Your DNS: 166.111.8.28 Just now when I think of it, maybe you meant to ping 166.111.208.28? Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 12:45:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7A416A420 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:45:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015E043D64 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so327581nzb for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:44:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=MP+eNhr9LbD5UDNDwOzE+ZbUbrTstLgqSnjjPtP8XL0NJqMxjJRDBlcjcG7bz7IOlO5/vILFSBfZS70G4Cy4pum2kQ8/AYlcpidvw5RL/vg+WoBb/4LHfcsWSNZDhlBpPEkEB3GX1jBMBhrfc6mjlyNtOJK9jeYNzLWUtRvtbAQ= Received: by 10.36.46.11 with SMTP id t11mr2086774nzt; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:44:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208204.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.204]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id j7sm1926383nzd.2005.12.25.04.44.54; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:44:56 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Erik =?iso-8859-1?q?N=F8rgaard?= Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:47:35 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AE884F.70002@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <43AE884F.70002@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512252047.35934.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:45:00 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 19:53, you wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 166.111.208.137 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 > > ether 00:11:85:1b:21:79 > > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/36Mbps) > > status: associated > > ssid A314b channel 11 bssid 00:09:5b:d1:fa:c4 > > authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 30 protmode CTS bintval 100 > > > > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > > ping: send to: No route to host > > it means I cannot connect to the internet even when I have got the > > wireless card an IP address using DHCP. WHY? > > > > can anybody help on this? any suggestion would be much appreciated. > > Take a close look at the ip/broadcast of your nic and the ip of the host > you're trying to ping. > > Your NIC: 166.111.208.137/23 > Your DNS: 166.111.8.28 > yes. they are not on the same LAN. but when I use my local NIC to connect the internet, everything is fine. the following is how my local NIC works: YuanJue@~$ ifconfig bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=1a inet 166.111.208.204 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 YuanJue@~$ ping 166.111.8.28 PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=251 time=0.525 ms 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=1 ttl=251 time=0.665 ms 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=2 ttl=251 time=0.521 ms ^C --- 166.111.8.28 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.521/0.570/0.665/0.067 ms YuanJue@~$ why does this work? it has the same netmask and broadcast address as the wireless NIC. Any more explanations? > They are not on the same network as far as I can see. > > Now, check that you have the default route set, > > # route -n get default thanks for your reply. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 12:52:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A88B16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB54643D66 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:52:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.16.2.1] (unknown [172.16.2.1]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE7F2E047; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:52:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43AE95ED.9040407@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:51:57 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050909) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuan Jue References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AE884F.70002@locolomo.org> <200512252047.35934.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512252047.35934.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:52:20 -0000 Yuan Jue wrote: > On Sunday 25 December 2005 19:53, you wrote: > yes. they are not on the same LAN. > but when I use my local NIC to connect the internet, everything is fine. > the following is how my local NIC works: > > YuanJue@~$ ifconfig > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=1a > inet 166.111.208.204 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 > ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > YuanJue@~$ ping 166.111.8.28 > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=251 time=0.525 ms > > why does this work? it has the same netmask and broadcast address > as the wireless NIC. Any more explanations? OK, now, if you have two nic's configured for the same lan things get wierd. Try # ifconfig bge0 down And, check that default route is set correctly. I think the default route binds not only to an ip but also to the interface that connects to that network, so maybe you have configured both bge0 and ath0 and default route set to go out bge0. Now, when you disconnect bge0 and try to ping, your ping is not sent on ath0 as you might think but on bge0. To check this kind of problems, use snort to sniff what's actually leaving your interface. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 13:15:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DCE16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:15:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com (out5.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB0843D4C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:15:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351B4D2DABB for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:15:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:15:57 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: ukt+WyUN3VQsxFgryXWXGbra5afhtTrnn/yITvboOdro 1135516556 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-194-149.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.194.149]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07A857146A for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:15:55 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:15:51 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <3A283EEDF2706ED6C7793233@[192.168.10.249]> <20051225104936.GA53795@echobase.hoth.dk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512251315.53168.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Changing hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:15:59 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 11:19, Sasa Stupar wrote: > --On 25. december 2005 11:49 +0100 "Martin P. Hansen" > > wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Sasa Stupar wrote: > >> I have curently my server on Asus A7N266-VM with Duron 900 and 632 MB > >> RAM, nic 3c905B-TX. I want to migrate to an Compaq with Intel 810 > >> chipset and P3 667. I am thinking to move HDD to compaq, plain and > >> simple. Is it enough to just change configuration for the NIC because > >> in compaq is Intel pro/100vm and the server should function properly or > >> do I need to make new server from the scratch. > > > > Unless you have a very customized KERNELCONF I don't see any problems > > with it, since it seems to be i386 architechture on both of the > > computers. If anything's been built with CPU specific optimizations, I would recompile without them before changing over. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 13:21:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C31F16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:21:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F9243D46 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so969257nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:21:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=rGMK3vxXMdrivH62TzG9/1nQJg7mcNFJHCqzNU0cdyeEdrb8tIHIidSRM4fPsBdCD1gDXzvkVTisGRh48bQV3+p5ZZndsgPqYqIDVzKI6BzheEbzYDDHUjR5TgnTefDIa0hDC/YtpQ744Rvj4Q+6gHDEGRxsLGQU1xPT/InR3lQ= Received: by 10.36.145.5 with SMTP id s5mr2089025nzd; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:21:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208241.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.241]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 10sm3435225nzo.2005.12.25.05.21.18; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:21:21 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Erik =?iso-8859-1?q?N=F8rgaard?= Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:24:01 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512252047.35934.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AE95ED.9040407@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <43AE95ED.9040407@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512252124.01702.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:21:23 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 20:51, you wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > On Sunday 25 December 2005 19:53, you wrote: > > yes. they are not on the same LAN. > > but when I use my local NIC to connect the internet, everything is fine. > > the following is how my local NIC works: > > > > YuanJue@~$ ifconfig > > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=1a > > inet 166.111.208.204 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 > > ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > YuanJue@~$ ping 166.111.8.28 > > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > > 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=251 time=0.525 ms > > > > why does this work? it has the same netmask and broadcast address > > as the wireless NIC. Any more explanations? > > OK, now, if you have two nic's configured for the same lan things get > wierd. Try > > # ifconfig bge0 down > > And, check that default route is set correctly. thank you very much. it does work now. :) you know, back to FreeBSD 5.4, things like this never happened. so I even never think about close the local NIC down to get the wireless one works. Maybe this is the FreeBSD 6.0's improvement on wireless access, right? > > I think the default route binds not only to an ip but also to the > interface that connects to that network, so maybe you have configured > both bge0 and ath0 and default route set to go out bge0. Now, when you > disconnect bge0 and try to ping, your ping is not sent on ath0 as you > might think but on bge0. thanks for your explanations. It is very appreciated. > > To check this kind of problems, use snort to sniff what's actually > leaving your interface. > > Cheers, Erik -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 13:28:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEA216A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:28:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs3.arnes.si (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10E643D53 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:28:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCD11D7934 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:28:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs3.arnes.si ([193.2.1.68]) by localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03029-04 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:28:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228951D7924 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:28:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] (master.workgroup [192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBPDSVOx000778 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:28:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:28:40 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <3A9E9EAC9AFBEE1771A3BAC5@[192.168.10.249]> In-Reply-To: References: <3A283EEDF2706ED6C7793233@[192.168.10.249]> <20051225104936.GA53795@echobase.hoth.dk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Subject: Re: Changing hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:28:35 -0000 --On 25. december 2005 12:19 +0100 Sasa Stupar wrote: > > > --On 25. december 2005 11:49 +0100 "Martin P. Hansen" > wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Sasa Stupar wrote: >>> I have curently my server on Asus A7N266-VM with Duron 900 and 632 MB >>> RAM, nic 3c905B-TX. I want to migrate to an Compaq with Intel 810 >>> chipset and P3 667. I am thinking to move HDD to compaq, plain and >>> simple. Is it enough to just change configuration for the NIC because >>> in compaq is Intel pro/100vm and the server should function properly or >>> do I need to make new server from the scratch. >> >> Unless you have a very customized KERNELCONF I don't see any problems >> with it, since it seems to be i386 architechture on both of the >> computers. >> >> I've never tried such migration myself, though. > > Will try and let you know. It works without any problems. Just booted and changed driver for NIC and it works. -- Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 13:49:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B6816A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs4.arnes.si (avs4.arnes.si [193.2.1.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D802D43D55 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs4.arnes.si [193.2.1.77]) by avs4.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BDA2C34CB for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:49:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs4.arnes.si ([193.2.1.77]) by localhost (avs4.arnes.si [193.2.1.77]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14957-02 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:49:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs4.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A84B2C34A0 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:49:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] (master.workgroup [192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBPDnQVh000902 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:49:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:49:35 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: FreeBSD Q ML Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Subject: Change default boot option X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:49:39 -0000 Hi! How do I change defalt boot option in FreeBSD 5.4? Now it boots with ACPI disable but I'd like to boot with ACPI enabled. Regards, -- Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 13:50:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA54216A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:50:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs2.arnes.si (avs2.arnes.si [193.2.1.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8336943D79 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:50:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs2.arnes.si [193.2.1.75]) by avs2.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135B124554B; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:50:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs2.arnes.si ([193.2.1.75]) by localhost (avs2.arnes.si [193.2.1.75]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55713-01; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:50:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs2.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE17245486; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:50:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] (master.workgroup [192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBPDoU9G000916; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:50:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:50:38 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200512251315.53168.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <3A283EEDF2706ED6C7793233@[192.168.10.249]> <20051225104936.GA53795@echobase.hoth.dk> <200512251315.53168.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Cc: Subject: Re: Changing hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:50:51 -0000 --On 25. december 2005 13:15 +0000 RW wrote: > On Sunday 25 December 2005 11:19, Sasa Stupar wrote: >> --On 25. december 2005 11:49 +0100 "Martin P. Hansen" >> >> >> wrote: >> > On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Sasa Stupar wrote: >> >> I have curently my server on Asus A7N266-VM with Duron 900 and 632 MB >> >> RAM, nic 3c905B-TX. I want to migrate to an Compaq with Intel 810 >> >> chipset and P3 667. I am thinking to move HDD to compaq, plain and >> >> simple. Is it enough to just change configuration for the NIC because >> >> in compaq is Intel pro/100vm and the server should function properly >> >> or do I need to make new server from the scratch. >> > >> > Unless you have a very customized KERNELCONF I don't see any problems >> > with it, since it seems to be i386 architechture on both of the >> > computers. > > If anything's been built with CPU specific optimizations, I would > recompile without them before changing over. > _______________________________________________ > I didn't compile my own kernel; I use generic for i586. -- Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 13:54:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8613C16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:54:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA71F43D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:54:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:54:29 +0100 id 0003982D.43AEA495.00006716 Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:54:29 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051225135429.GA26359@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20051224172453.0f080843@atomizer.opensourcebeef.net> <20051224225721.17983.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051224225721.17983.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:54:31 -0000 On 24 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > Schwab Streetsmart > Accounting Software (CA) > Quicken > Photoshop > Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs) > > Those are the ones I use daily. Surely there are > some half-assed alternatives for some of these, > but if I have to use something inferior to use > FreeBSD then thats a point against it. NO. It's not a point against the OS. It merely demonstrates why lots of people stay with windows. NOT because the OS is better, but its support by *third party soft-hardware* is better. Windows itself (the OS) is worse than FreeBSD (imho). Those 3th party people are responsable for the leading role of microsoft. Not MS itself. I'm convinced (though not proven yet) that the software you mentioned above will run on FreeBSD (if ported natively to the OS) at least as good, but I guess even better, then it does on windows. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 14:01:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E52116A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:01:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA4343D53 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:01:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so970486nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:01:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=jqVRIhxR4BSDBYwITUGplXUMIiFbW0QbYRoDrDdMMYRIyXNq5WimszAyk0uKYFwmFockbmL8RtdgwnBdlKH4aU6BRzAWIJj3EQ3PEY2g6zKqrD1VMa9tJXcsivCQvZ2UW0fTcWT6AqkjbT5QVSsrg7KSlknxeonYE4SFning7C0= Received: by 10.36.79.16 with SMTP id c16mr2200690nzb; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:01:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.86? ( [221.186.3.89]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id c12sm3474062nzc.2005.12.25.06.01.06; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:01:07 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:58:19 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3960800.NvOTidPYS1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512252301.03015.kjelderg@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Change default boot option X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:01:09 -0000 --nextPart3960800.NvOTidPYS1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 25 December 2005 22:49, Sasa Stupar wrote: > Hi! > > How do I change defalt boot option in FreeBSD 5.4? Now it boots with ACPI > disable but I'd like to boot with ACPI enabled. In man acpi(4), if you look in the section on LOADER TUNABLES, you can see= =20 hint.acpi.0.disabled that variable. If you set that in /boot/loader.conf,= =20 you should have the desired effect. Hope that helps, Eric =2D-=20 The signature is a location used to give a personalised feel to each E-mail= =20 without having to personalise each E-mail. --nextPart3960800.NvOTidPYS1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDrqYeSMnO3Fce5JgRAt47AJ9P5DhTI7vpDlsBRoH5vdi62m4XMACgmQGR 2gGuxWPhemWKtdwO7w/wN3k= =PSzd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3960800.NvOTidPYS1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 14:02:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E875216A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:02:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C3843D79 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:02:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so335061nzb for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:02:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Oaf/fw/Txnyk45WgZ8ZRxwky2J1b5zuv6qj62JoVcClyOvKZ2zkWJA5hvaGD7MRj1QmDCh5YVL+jRe3iZtamzcizJB9BAg5+6zfD/5pwMBJJYMFBwoE+axFwmFSxkdHvYv4Vc3Okl9EhHL1PR0Bh4hAud8RQznUczFzIJuL5XmM= Received: by 10.37.18.66 with SMTP id v66mr2135545nzi; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:02:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208241.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.241]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm3517298nzo.2005.12.25.06.02.52; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:02:54 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Erik =?iso-8859-1?q?N=F8rgaard?= Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:05:33 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512252047.35934.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AE95ED.9040407@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <43AE95ED.9040407@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512252205.33644.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:02:59 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 20:51, you wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > On Sunday 25 December 2005 19:53, you wrote: > > yes. they are not on the same LAN. > > but when I use my local NIC to connect the internet, everything is fine. > > the following is how my local NIC works: > > > > YuanJue@~$ ifconfig > > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=1a > > inet 166.111.208.204 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 166.111.209.255 > > ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > status: active > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > YuanJue@~$ ping 166.111.8.28 > > PING 166.111.8.28 (166.111.8.28): 56 data bytes > > 64 bytes from 166.111.8.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=251 time=0.525 ms > > > > why does this work? it has the same netmask and broadcast address > > as the wireless NIC. Any more explanations? > > OK, now, if you have two nic's configured for the same lan things get > wierd. Try > > # ifconfig bge0 down > > And, check that default route is set correctly. > > I think the default route binds not only to an ip but also to the > interface that connects to that network, so maybe you have configured > both bge0 and ath0 and default route set to go out bge0. Now, when you > disconnect bge0 and try to ping, your ping is not sent on ath0 as you > might think but on bge0. > > To check this kind of problems, use snort to sniff what's actually > leaving your interface. one more question since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure from time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default setting, which is as follows: YuanJue@~$ ifconfig bge0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 options=1a inet 59.66.138.109 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 59.66.138.255 ether 00:0d:9d:90:e0:68 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier as you can see, it is totally different from the dynamic IP address I can get. and when I go to a classroom, I use DHCP to change my bge0 settings. now the question is: since I wanna use my wireless NIC, it seems that it is not enough that just close bge0 down at this time. using command "route -n get default" i get: YuanJue@~$ route -n get default route to: default destination: default mask: default gateway: 59.66.138.1 interface: bge0 flags: recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msec rttvar hopcount mtu expire 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0 YuanJue@~$ so even I have shutted bge0 down, the ping still cannot work correctly. how can I get things right here? I think maybe i can change the interface using by route but "route -q change interface ath0" doesn't work. it says: YuanJue# route -q change interface ath0 route: bad address: interface YuanJue# what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my situation? thanks. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 14:29:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9938816A420 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80C7343D6E for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:29:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 95776 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Dec 2005 14:29:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OkSOeF/gmcnZSdwOsC48PSGOz4SIBfVggW0rjDsjkjXA5Tqq7rljdA/Ymerfi04OGUeyOFpvfPNjamXEE65RG9+fMno6xOF7W8Hxns7ZY8tP5T2Vb2q7gdsPFzhcDUAnp6wIQTVXovUjy5sh/0bco3ZW9SVGgJPZ3N7pdc+NIwA= ; Message-ID: <20051225142947.95774.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:29:47 PST Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:29:47 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: dick hoogendijk , freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20051225135429.GA26359@lothlorien.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:29:50 -0000 --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 24 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > > Schwab Streetsmart > > Accounting Software (CA) > > Quicken > > Photoshop > > Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs) > > > > Those are the ones I use daily. Surely there > are > > some half-assed alternatives for some of > these, > > but if I have to use something inferior to > use > > FreeBSD then thats a point against it. > > NO. It's not a point against the OS. It merely > demonstrates why lots of > people stay with windows. NOT because the OS is > better, but its support > by *third party soft-hardware* is better. > > Windows itself (the OS) is worse than FreeBSD > (imho). Those 3th party > people are responsable for the leading role of > microsoft. > Not MS itself. > > I'm convinced (though not proven yet) that the > software you mentioned > above will run on FreeBSD (if ported natively > to the OS) at least as > good, but I guess even better, then it does on > windows. "worse" and "more useful" are different criteria. A harley davidson may be a better built machine than any given SUV, but its not as practical or useful. Its usefulness is limited to enthusiasts and those with disdain for society, much like the un*x desktop. __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 14:33:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D2716A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:33:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13C4E43D4C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:33:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 86898 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Dec 2005 14:33:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Aebds6+zodzFaZQn2v7Z84LV4DMUDvVubdA0Q0G5F6f6PqerIet1X/2mLovRFk6ARFW6D0klpDdmzCoIxQNYlCnWfBqDHlAEy5ukUJ9uZ/uCDA4p8PMOySGeqc9+12rCZnFlHX2M082TSzOLyrGDuGcrUSgqnEFqV4a/s0ZT3QE= ; Message-ID: <20051225143322.86896.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:33:22 PST Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:33:22 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20051225012143.GD1367@flame.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Miguel Saturnino , Don Hinton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:33:23 -0000 --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-12-24 14:01, Danial Thom > wrote: > > Don Hinton wrote: > > > For me, FreeBSD is about twice as fast/easy > to install/configure, > > > and infinitely cheaper. > > > > Considering that WinXP usually comes on the > computer, I don't see how > > "installing and configuring FreeBSD" can be > easier than having to do > > nothing at all? > > Windows XP comes preinstalled, yes. Not > "preconfigured" too. It so > happens that configuring a Windows XP system to > match one's preferences > has the potential to: > > a) Screw the machine up so completely and > utterly that a reinstall > is required. > b) Take a lot of time. A huge lot of time, > because of all the > different 'driver' installation > processes. Ate you claiming that someone not familiar with how to configure FreeBSD can't screw it up beyond usefulness? I can point you at about 10% of my customers who've spent weeks just trying to compile a kernel and get basic networking working, much less a desktop with X. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 14:48:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2695416A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:48:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johan.spee@wanadoo.nl) Received: from smtp06.wanadoo.nl (smtp06.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857A543D5A for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:48:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johan.spee@wanadoo.nl) Received: from raccoon.com (adsl-dc-45560.adsl.wanadoo.nl [83.118.243.96]) by smtp6.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 594FC6FC2F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:48:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:48:51 +0100 From: Johan Spee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051225154851.5b68d9a2.johan.spee@wanadoo.nl> X-Gratia: Eve ryth ingis gon nabeal right X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.1.7 (FreeBSD 6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD + Wine + Office 2K X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:48:49 -0000 Merry Christmas! Although winehq.com is not altogether clear about it I get the impression from other sites that wine should be able to handle office 2000 without any problems. Some claim they have office XP and even office 2003 running on FreeBSD (http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~plug/mail_archive/0512/0046.html). I gave it a try with FreeBSD 6, Wine 0.9.4 and Office 2000 sp3 - unfortunately it would not even install properly. With wine in the win98 mode the installation gets stuck in 0% cpu activity, in the winXP mode it gets stuck in 100% cpu activity. Wine also does not allow me to do a 'custom' installation. A tree-structure with all the office items is shown, but it is not possible to check or uncheck any of those. As a consequence the whole suite is installed, including the 'forbidden' assistant. In win98 mode I have been able to get Word to open a file, more or less, and then had to kill wine to close the program. Is it actually possible to run office 2000 on FreeBSD? If so, I would appreciate some tips or hints. Thanks and Happy New Year, in advance -- Johan Spee http://home.wanadoo.nl/johan.spee/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 14:50:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC44D16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:50:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com (out5.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D6F43D7C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:50:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B58D2B338 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:50:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:50:16 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: Qq/FcKyAcaGoV3I+cu7ZUw0UHc7sM/tAstuLsmc4Cv/Z 1135522215 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-194-149.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.194.149]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C464B57146C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:50:15 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:50:10 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512240716.29744.zettel@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <200512240716.29744.zettel@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512251450.14281.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Forth include ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:50:23 -0000 On Saturday 24 December 2005 07:16, Leonard Zettel wrote: > This undoubtedly is of no importance whatsoever, > natheless this inquiring mind would like to know. > > The FreeBSD boot loader is written in Forth, which > I happen to be able to read (sort of, anyway). > EXCEPT the word "include" occurs in a number > of places. I grant it is fair to middling obvious what it > does. At the same time, I have not been able to find a definition > for include in any of the reference materials I have on > Forth. It is defninetly NOT ANS (or ISO) Forth (which specifies the > words INCLUDE-FILE and INCLUDED). > > So 1) Can anybody give a stack picture for include ? > 2) What version/dialect of Forth does FreeBSD use > and is there any place I can get documentation on it? Looking through the source it appears it's not stricly speaking Forth, but rather FICL. http://ficl.sourceforge.net/ FWIW I have seen include in older, pre-ansi, versions of forth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 15:15:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD42D16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:15:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F192243D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:15:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.16.2.1] (unknown [172.16.2.1]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51C92E047; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:15:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43AEB79D.9030200@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:15:41 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050909) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuan Jue References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512252047.35934.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AE95ED.9040407@locolomo.org> <200512252205.33644.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512252205.33644.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:15:47 -0000 Yuan Jue wrote: > one more question > since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address > in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure from > time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default setting, which > is as follows: > > what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my > situation? Try to take a look at dhclient.conf(5) and dhclient(8) and set all interfaces to be configured with dhcp. I think it should be posible to configure default values so there is something to fall back on if a lease is not obtained. Note that dhclient is new in FBSD 6, this is also why you had to take down the other interface. The old dhclient would reset all dhcp configured interfaces, the new doesn't, which is quite neat because usually you would have the two interfaces connected to /different/ networks. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 13:34:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3897A16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:34:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mamaj1979@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay19-f9.bay19.hotmail.com [64.4.53.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0424143D5A for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:34:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mamaj1979@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:34:08 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 62.90.133.246 by by19fd.bay19.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:34:07 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.90.133.246] X-Originating-Email: [mamaj1979@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mamaj1979@hotmail.com From: "mamaj m" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:34:07 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Dec 2005 13:34:08.0251 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1D894B0:01C60957] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:22:02 +0000 Cc: Subject: Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:34:09 -0000 Hi, Please answer my question This is the first time i use Freebsd So i want to configare the webmin on my server , i download the webmin on a cd how can i configure the webmin on my Freebsd server Many Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 16:01:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4C016A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:01:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DDE43D62 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:01:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so347587nzb for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:01:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=E97EXo1Q3hCRA09ISZkN0ugcEkKNxHsIRYvydslTlCBxytKtilwH1qVDNZ+uAuwWL78Bu3PI6oxIR1Yu8gflIrBJ1KbArwPldWBfBFfofRaZrgU3l43MzUQs0yC8eUmfVoAgLtA0QTYumCoVv+fGVFSduo2CR/EchfA06B0/ZDM= Received: by 10.37.18.66 with SMTP id v66mr2220731nzi; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:01:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id c1sm2062825nzd.2005.12.25.08.01.29; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:01:32 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:54:04 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Subject: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:01:34 -0000 hello, all is there any software that like Rainlender on Windows? I need to make some notes sometimes, and i think it would be much better if the notes could be always shown on the desktop to remind me. Kontact is great, but not at this point :( any suggestions? thanks. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 16:16:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECFC16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B8B43D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:16:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so986038nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:16:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=hdIutamr45eRM30JXkEcjLD8BKXKSEskYVvglUq4cMp+Bvvh9iUyUQwhDDiPRnNv15+JxJz21lvws6v+qTmgsq9sVHb4H0CC9IT/92+vx7ekVjvVC5A0BSQXwNdgv08aBgvUFK/TkituEsFsCtl9iQ52KL4RLnlqlRg7eJQLHvQ= Received: by 10.36.50.8 with SMTP id x8mr2236627nzx; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.86? ( [221.186.3.89]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id r1sm3841281nzd.2005.12.25.08.16.09; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:16:10 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:15:54 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8306545.GnOz8NYEAf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512260116.06379.kjelderg@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:16:12 -0000 --nextPart8306545.GnOz8NYEAf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 26 December 2005 00:54, Yuan Jue wrote: > hello, all > > is there any software that like Rainlender on Windows? I need to make > some notes sometimes, and i think it would be much better if the notes > could be always shown on the desktop to remind me. Kontact is great, but > not at this point :( Do you perhaps mean something like kde's knotes? =2D-=20 The signature is a location used to give a personalised feel to each E-mail= =20 without having to personalise each E-mail. --nextPart8306545.GnOz8NYEAf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDrsXGSMnO3Fce5JgRAtFQAJsHbzLSGTT2xyqT23WsCqGck6Xi3ACeKD0B hvjm8cvbx+tb0lQcp0VJ6rQ= =JAGH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8306545.GnOz8NYEAf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 16:19:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED25016A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:19:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.122.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CD443D46 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:19:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FFF640D; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:19:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25498-07; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:19:34 -0600 (CST) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1008) id BF62C6404; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:19:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from [216.201.122.106] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.122.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983BE6144; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:19:34 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <43AEC6A4.2020506@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:19:48 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051204) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Kjeldergaard References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260116.06379.kjelderg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512260116.06379.kjelderg@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on makeworld.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: RacerX@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:19:37 -0000 Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 00:54, Yuan Jue wrote: > >>hello, all >> >>is there any software that like Rainlender on Windows? I need to make >>some notes sometimes, and i think it would be much better if the notes >>could be always shown on the desktop to remind me. Kontact is great, but >>not at this point :( > > > Do you perhaps mean something like kde's knotes? > A simple symlink to a simple text file works for me -- Best regards, Chris Real programmers argue with the systems analyst as a matter of principle. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 16:33:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4594516A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:33:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A97643D4C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:33:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so350665nzb for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:33:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=LJIa+OcFK4FoYmZYeH9LHPAoC/p9r7H3vtNKeWe9l7DJwzzOJXLuDimFL0CjN4m4xNd6mJa8EVZtry5IJzwbADwb6LWy1fHHJjkuqhmF3R6/AqCgzk4iDz5i5kA86Id7JDNYgB7vJsz9tXa73QddsyIQ3A6yT0XRsmBzdtffX2M= Received: by 10.36.194.20 with SMTP id r20mr2232239nzf; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm8136377nza.2005.12.25.08.33.19; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:33:20 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Eric Kjeldergaard Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:35:59 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260116.06379.kjelderg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512260116.06379.kjelderg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512260036.00517.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:33:22 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 00:15, you wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 00:54, Yuan Jue wrote: > > hello, all > > > > is there any software that like Rainlender on Windows? I need to make > > some notes sometimes, and i think it would be much better if the notes > > could be always shown on the desktop to remind me. Kontact is great, but > > not at this point :( > > Do you perhaps mean something like kde's knotes? thanks for your reply. knotes does its work, but not that well as Rainlender. I mean its look and interface. can knote be transparent? -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 16:38:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76ED016A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:38:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp.wp.pl [212.77.101.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A511043D49 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:38:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 6999 invoked from network); 25 Dec 2005 17:38:20 +0100 Received: from aed26.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO maslan) (maslan-freebsd@[83.16.107.26]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for ; 25 Dec 2005 17:38:20 +0100 Message-ID: <000901c60971$a810de30$1e00000a@maslan> From: "maslan-freebsd" To: References: Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:38:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO AS1=NO AS2=YES(0.999989) AS3=NO AS4=NO Subject: Re: Change default boot option X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:38:24 -0000 you should interested file: /boot/defaults/loader.conf and try to type: sysctl -A > Hi! > > How do I change defalt boot option in FreeBSD 5.4? Now it boots with ACPI > disable but I'd like to boot with ACPI enabled. > > Regards, > -- > Sasa Stupar > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 16:41:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3CC16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FCA43D49 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:41:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so988366nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:41:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=bFDN6yBUn0WGaPU5fW4hL5UX1Nw1hxx4zu4sOaOBTeeTGDzC92HX5dgCC0GMCGPtDElgmzUyZ6kPj79gO4vJZa5+DKuATUkzEeQm96lBTK5+KyM4j0Drg6KAvO/yqfviEpjZ62cnQjgS9Cli/GIzFb+nHnqUinr47AqyruGg1ts= Received: by 10.36.103.3 with SMTP id a3mr2256896nzc; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:41:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm8147596nza.2005.12.25.08.41.31; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:41:32 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Johan Spee Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:44:12 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051225154851.5b68d9a2.johan.spee@wanadoo.nl> In-Reply-To: <20051225154851.5b68d9a2.johan.spee@wanadoo.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512260044.12812.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD + Wine + Office 2K X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:41:34 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 22:48, you wrote: > Merry Christmas! > > Although winehq.com is not altogether clear about it I get the impression > from other sites that wine should be able to handle office 2000 without any > problems. Some claim they have office XP and even office 2003 running on > FreeBSD (http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~plug/mail_archive/0512/0046.html). I > gave it a try with FreeBSD 6, Wine 0.9.4 and Office 2000 sp3 - > unfortunately it would not even install properly. With wine in the win98 > mode the installation gets stuck in 0% cpu activity, in the winXP mode it > gets stuck in 100% cpu activity. Wine also does not allow me to do a > 'custom' installation. A tree-structure with all the office items is shown, > but it is not possible to check or uncheck any of those. As a consequence > the whole suite is installed, including the 'forbidden' assistant. In win98 > mode I have been able to get Word to open a file, more or less, and then > had to kill wine to close the program. > > Is it actually possible to run office 2000 on FreeBSD? If so, I would > appreciate some tips or hints. > why not try openoffice? just a work around :) -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 16:54:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE8616A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teoheras@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF5743D4C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teoheras@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so990954nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:54:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=m0uSd3jlrQDKIB7sxrJIBRv0IIuN0m0nKDAuZ6YlOTFub/ngvlq0PDAgyr2EKNefLhR9PkB2S9IBEzGG3oAhg+6LAITHrkQo9yVucKqvr+CEOp+jSAJlILHFgFmkx54WTeYucfPzL3zIphfekGgfLz+Cfj3m32YhSdjFNB/jiTY= Received: by 10.36.148.14 with SMTP id v14mr2330973nzd; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:54:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.147.15 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:54:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:54:17 -0500 From: Teo De Las Heras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <040001c608c1$ba6b1c90$0301a8c0@dazzle> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <040001c608c1$ba6b1c90$0301a8c0@dazzle> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Start X hangs the computer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:19 -0000 Have you installed the GeForce drivers? If not, you'll need to get them from the nvidia site and install them. They also just release a new utilit= y that will adjust your xorg.conf file so that it's setup correctly to work with the Nvidia card. I believe the utility is called nvidia-xconfig. http://download.nvidia.com/freebsd/1.0-8178/README/index.html Teo On 12/24/05, Javier Matos wrote: > > Hello, I was searching about my problem in a lot off forums but I don=B4t > find > a solution... . > > I Install FreeBSD 6.0 in my box (I have 2 boxes and FreeBSD was installed > in > both). The first one work fine with all > the configuration that I make but the second (boxes are different) have > problems because I can start "startx", "xdm" > and "kdm" and it show the screen for a while with the correct resolution > but > then the screen freeze and after some > seconds the box restart... . I can=B4t find any reason for this behaviour > because log files seems to show that all is > working. I follow the same steeps with two boxes but only one can run X. > > The box who crashes is a P5GD1_PRO (Intel 915P chipset), my graphic card > is > a GeForce FX 6200 (PCI-Express). > > Anyone have any idea about the what is the problem? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 16:56:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CA716A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:56:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teoheras@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B040A43D5D for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:56:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teoheras@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so991186nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:56:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GD/Ycs5LNaDUJhlEEoreKK8QbCKcDinRSes9JJgR6W11c6MBdSlGZbhHJRvJ4m5U+nu0SIk1bikrjXvD6NSXBfKcEgDVWbaqJo6MqchkpuRhPv1/dWy8rLT6XghTup4HzsT/XPBxrjB2wsQgB2Sa3EkN8ejkFSPz4peCOepJFLc= Received: by 10.37.20.55 with SMTP id x55mr2342795nzi; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:56:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.147.15 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:56:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:56:24 -0500 From: Teo De Las Heras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44oe37mua2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <43ac46b2.4bf45e95.738e.3216@mx.gmail.com> <44oe37mua2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Quick, simple backup solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:56:26 -0000 Lowell, Great Site!! Thanks... http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/systuff On 23 Dec 2005 15:29:41 -0500, Lowell Gilbert < freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > > "Joe Wood" writes: > > > I am looking for a quick backup solution for my freebsd machine. > Currently I > > backup to a DDS-4 DAT drive using the following while in "/": > > > > > > > > tar -cf /dev/sa0 -I /root/includes -X /root/excludes . > > > > > > > > I am aware of bacula, Amanda, cpio, and dump but to me tar is the ideal > > method so if anyone had a simple script to automate this process I woul= d > > greatly appreciate some help in making my own. > > Since we have no idea *why* you consider tar ideal, we can't really > tell what would help your particular needs. > > On my page of FreeBSD tricks (http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/systuff/), > I have a brief essay on what to consider when designing a backup > strategy (http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/systuff/backup-strategy.txt), > as well as some script I use for backups via both tar and dump > (http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/systuff/scripts/systemTarBackup and > http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/systuff/scripts/systemDumpBackup). > > Make what you can out of these hints. > > Be well. > -- > Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area > http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 17:09:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A1616A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:09:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A6E43D4C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:09:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so992489nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:09:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=IuZG1PP14XJd/5hKGco76bT7YlAI8I2nOigxX8zWDmhxn51NYc3Edy325EqsumD/DAnOsuqa8DSbn7mc9gGLqsKBVrZB1Odt8s/XRK15jhTCZe3Kf4wab84iNwoso+vqatDUVWHfjmwA0lKSqFuQSWLDRUWTdAB1eeu9DldU9rw= Received: by 10.36.227.70 with SMTP id z70mr2352931nzg; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:09:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.86? ( [221.186.3.89]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm3753215nzk.2005.12.25.09.09.49; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:09:50 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: Yuan Jue Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:09:38 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260116.06379.kjelderg@gmail.com> <200512260036.00517.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512260036.00517.yuanjue02@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1409606.DWYUuiyvxm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512260209.44561.kjelderg@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:09:56 -0000 --nextPart1409606.DWYUuiyvxm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 26 December 2005 01:35, Yuan Jue wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 00:15, you wrote: > > On Monday 26 December 2005 00:54, Yuan Jue wrote: > > > hello, all > > > > > > is there any software that like Rainlender on Windows? I need to make > > > some notes sometimes, and i think it would be much better if the notes > > > could be always shown on the desktop to remind me. Kontact is great, > > > but not at this point :( > > > > Do you perhaps mean something like kde's knotes? > > thanks for your reply. knotes does its work, but not that well as > Rainlender. I mean its look and interface. can knote be transparent? Sure, kwin can make any application transparent. It appears that knotes on= my=20 system just magically is translucent, probably because it is a dock window,= =20 but you can set this more specifically for knotes by setting "window specif= ic=20 settings" for the window class knotes. Hope this helps, Eric =2D-=20 The signature is a location used to give a personalised feel to each E-mail= =20 without having to personalise each E-mail. --nextPart1409606.DWYUuiyvxm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDrtJYSMnO3Fce5JgRAvL3AJoDvQDh2uuJJ0KokRl65HBBJtChIgCfeyGc xmHqS1BPPDEosKAfpYmVjiI= =sAIQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1409606.DWYUuiyvxm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 17:20:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E6016A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:20:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kwc@shell.TheWorld.com) Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls1.std.com [192.74.137.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAED143D4C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:20:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kwc@shell.TheWorld.com) Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBPHK1Wu003377; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:20:01 -0500 Received: (from kwc@localhost) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA16909536; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:15:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:15:10 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200512251715.MAA16909536@shell.TheWorld.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pcls1.std.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86rc1/1217/Sat Dec 24 09:39:31 2005 on pcls1.std.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: fetch(1) vs browser download fails comparison X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:20:06 -0000 Hello: How might a file retrieved/downloaded by fetch(1) differ from the same file downloaded by a web browser (in this case mozilla & firefox)? Specifically, if I download the free version of ZoneAlarm for Windows (about 10mb) by each of these methods, I get the file(s) and they're both the same length, but they fail comparison, both by cmp(1) and by differing md5 hashes. As a counterexample, fetching OpenOffice (some 80mb or so) works fine & hash-verifies correctly. This same behavior is with both 4.10-stable and 5.4-release. Ideas? Please cc me any replies. Thanks, -kc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 17:26:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FF216A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:26:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth02.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth02.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E555C43D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:26:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth02.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1EqZe0-0005n7-Fb; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:26:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:26:59 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: "mamaj m" Message-ID: <20051225112659.0ae2ff3d@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc692c81b325b115e60c12d0fd7e9e29e1350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:26:53 -0000 On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:34:07 +0000 "mamaj m" wrote: > Hi, > Please answer my question > > This is the first time i use Freebsd > So i want to configare the webmin on my server , i download the > webmin on a cd > how can i configure the webmin on my Freebsd server > > Many Thanks > If you installed the ports system, you can install webmin by following the instructions in the article linked below: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2000/10/25/FreeBSD_Basics.html Best of luck, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 17:29:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A1C16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:29:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6C343D49 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:29:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from axelds.demon.nl ([83.160.138.74]:7590 helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EqZgJ-000O2n-SD; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:29:16 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" To: "'mamaj m'" , Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:28:49 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcYJZwBsPElKlkHDS4OlTwB9tytl8AAEZ9aA In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Subject: RE: Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:29:17 -0000 1. make sure you have the ports tree and internet connectivity and forget your cd. Should you not have internet connectivity, make sure you have the package from the ports tree (http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/sysutils/webmin/webmin.tar.gz?tarball=1) and place this in /usr/ports/distfiles. 2. # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/webmin 3. # make install clean Webmin has now been installed 4. # cd /usr/local/lib/webmin 5. # ./setup.sh 6. follow the instructions and your done. Webmin has now been configured. 7. read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html Maybe point 7 should be point 1. Regards, Ruben -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of mamaj m Sent: December 25, 2005 2:34 PM To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Help Hi, Please answer my question This is the first time i use Freebsd So i want to configare the webmin on my server , i download the webmin on a cd how can i configure the webmin on my Freebsd server Many Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.7/214 - Release Date: 12/23/2005 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.7/214 - Release Date: 12/23/2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 18:33:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE1316A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:33:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from m21.unixathome.org (m21.unixathome.org [205.150.199.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25B243D6E for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:33:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [205.150.199.217]) by m21.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574ADC36A; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:33:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from m21.unixathome.org ([205.150.199.217]) by localhost (m21.unixathome.org [205.150.199.217]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13374-02; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:33:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [70.26.229.230]) by m21.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF8CBF58; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:33:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.55.0.99] (wocker.unixathome.org [10.55.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6A93D3B; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:33:20 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" To: Ariff Abdullah Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:33:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <43AE9FA0.20947.8E03359@dan.langille.org> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20051225150516.74155b06.skywizard@MyBSD.org.my> References: <43ADBC0C.23308.5673D21@dan.langille.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.31) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unixathome.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6: routing on the local LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:33:27 -0000 On 25 Dec 2005 at 15:05, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:20 -0500 > "Dan Langille" wrote: > > On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500 > > > "Dan Langille" wrote: > > > > Gidday folks, > > > > > > > > I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway. > > > > > > > > I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The > > > > tunnel is > > > > > > > > setup and working. From my gateway I can access various IPv6 > > > > websites (e.g http://www.kame.net). I have enabled rtadvd(8) on > > > > my gateway. For the netstat, ifconfig, etc, see [1]. > > > > > > > > >From a computer inside my gateway, I cannot ping anything, not > > > > >even > > > > > > > > > the gateway. I suspect it's because the routing tables are not > > > > being set up on the gateway. I expected the system to do that > > > > automatically. I also expected fxp0 to get an IPv6 address out > > > > of this. Did I guess wrong? I suspect that if I can get fxp0 > > > > on the gateway, all will be well. If not, I think Ineed to set > > > > up static routes. > > > > > > Add a single 2001:470:1F00:1979::/64 address each for both fxp0/1. > > > You don't even need rtadv.conf :) > > > > > > rc.conf:- > > > ipv6_ifconfig_fxp0="2001:470:1F00:1979::1/64" > > > ipv6_ifconfig_fxp1="2001:470:1F00:1979::2/64" > > > > Thanks. > > > > I wanted to run rtadvd for the boxes inside the LAN. That ensure > > they get an address in the right range (AFAIK). > > > For this simple configuration, you don't even need rtadvd.conf. Adding > anyprefix/64 address to router interface and running rtadvd -D > router_interface will do the job. man rtadvd shows that -D is debugging. $ grep rtad /etc/rc.conf rtadvd_enable="YES" # let our LAN know the IPv6 default route rtadvd_interfaces="fxp1" # our private LAN I can't try it yet, but it looks like removing /etc/rtadvd.conf may do the trick. Merry Christmas. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 18:37:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD08C16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@apriori.net) Received: from modena360.cwihosting.com (modena360.cwihosting.com [209.18.76.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AE943D58 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@apriori.net) Received: from apriori by modena360.cwihosting.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EqakQ-0000H2-Mk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:37:34 -0500 From: "Your Name" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.27 X-IPAddress: 127.0.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:37:34 -0500 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - modena360.cwihosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [688 689] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - apriori.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:37:36 -0000 In the most recent digest, I saw the reply: Message: 7 Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0600 Subject: Re: USB/multi-wheel mice conf files if anyone wants them > > In case it is of any help to anyone, I recently got two of my mice > > running on FreeBSD 5.4 with Xorg, and I could post the Xorg conf > > files I ended up using. > It will help. Please post them. > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer I guess I was reading the thread about USB mice with some anxiety, since I have had no difficulties with them. It seems to be a matter of finding the correct driver and port; but it generally comes down to /dev/sysmouse for me. Here are the config files I use for my USB mice. I am using Xorg. For my A4Tech Optical GreatEye wheel mouse, model WOP-35PU: (This has 4 buttons and 2 wheels; the wheels are for up/down and right/left scrolling.) For newbies to this (and I am no expert, either!), be advised that the first section of the xorg.conf file must have the correct references to the mouse section or else it will almost certainly not find your settings correctly. So for the A4Tech, it looks like: Section "ServerLayout" (Identifier stuff here) (Screen stuff here) InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" (InputDevice stuff here) EndSection [some other sections in here] Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "SendCoreEvents" "true" Option "Buttons" "9" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection ---------- For my Starlogic 8D Mini Scrolling mouse... This may not be available any more under that brand, but I I recently bought the same thing branded as Compaq USB Trackball/Optical Mouse model CPQ650TP. I use it on my laptop because it's smaller and I don't need as much desktop area to move it around. Section "ServerLayout" (Identifier stuff here) (Screen stuff here) InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" (InputDevice stuff here) EndSection [some other sections in here] Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "SendCoreEvents" "true" Option "Buttons" "7" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection --- I had to do some guessing (i.e., trial and error) to determine how many "buttons" xorg thinks it sees coming from the mice. Hope this helps! Kind regards and Happy Holidays! Rob, thanks for the advice about CVSupping. I'm updating my ports collection now. Cheers, -- paz. P.S. - I'm looking for a suggestion for a CD ripper; or perhaps I'm not using KAudioCreator right. If I select all the tracks on a CD, it blarfs when it is trying to rip the second or third track while simultaneously converting the first track to .mp3 or whatever. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 18:47:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A0516A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:47:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs3.arnes.si (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043BB43D6A for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:47:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE4E1D79CF; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:47:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs3.arnes.si ([193.2.1.68]) by localhost (avs3.arnes.si [193.2.1.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17622-10; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:47:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs3.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D931D798E; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:47:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] (master.workgroup [192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBPIl3dr001018; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:47:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:47:12 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: maslan-freebsd , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4E21E43094F2525926B3604A@[192.168.10.249]> In-Reply-To: <000901c60971$a810de30$1e00000a@maslan> References: <000901c60971$a810de30$1e00000a@maslan> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Cc: Subject: Re: Change default boot option X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:47:17 -0000 --On 25. december 2005 17:38 +0100 maslan-freebsd wrote: > you should interested file: /boot/defaults/loader.conf > and try to type: sysctl -A > >> Hi! >> >> How do I change defalt boot option in FreeBSD 5.4? Now it boots with ACPI >> disable but I'd like to boot with ACPI enabled. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Sasa Stupar Thanx. Now I have boot with acpi enabled. -- Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 18:57:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5042E16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:57:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy_sjostrom@yahoo.com) Received: from web31310.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31310.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7E6D43D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:57:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy_sjostrom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 33686 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Dec 2005 18:57:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wqtgDUD3VkopFZ4Uf23DFCSm0TGXYRjSlGnGnqcjtKcTRDvjgunIJqwMmSX1FmKhiBIYoK7fzmi6XDgW4mrkc3NCcD0QGKaYulyHCiUHrHTpExr4TkejLE4fn+7WlSYsu9jHvY+3tWE2AMKKHokhiX24wTfmeiuXhjHYkPMooJA= ; Message-ID: <20051225185725.33681.qmail@web31310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.223.241.58] by web31310.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:57:25 PST Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:57:25 -0800 (PST) From: Andy Sjostrom To: "Daniel A." In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550512250840x34517106le497b25236ad7d23@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:57:27 -0000 Hi Daniel I have not forgotten Ubuntu. I did try it last spring in a vain attempt and on the advisement of my computer tech and slackware guru (in my eye's only of cousre) to find a better OS. My tech keeps tring to push me toward the slackware. and he doesn't understand that many of my clients are windows user's and they have voice and cams. several of them have made it clear that if I did not have the cam and voice they would have gone to someone else that did. While I'm sure that Ubuntu is an excelent program and I will give it another look. at the present time I'm leaning more toward the ALinux OS. Like the PC BSD it looks like a great program. everything I have been told and read about it make is sound alot like window. which for me at the present time is a good thing. The only reason I'm leaning more toward the Alinux is becauseof the voice and cam opitions with the chat program. If the PC BSD had that option I would be looking more closely at the PC BSD. The PC BSD is a excellent looking program. and Ilove what they did with the screen shots. That in it self was very impressive. For me though it will not workout as it does not have the voice or cam opitions that I require for my needs. The only down side I have seen of the ALinux is that they are asking for either a donation or a straight up front price tag of $39.95. Don't get me wrong here compared to what the knit wit that owns Microsoft is charging for XP thats nothing to worry about. and I'm more then willing to pay the price for the program. (Besides I know that man does not live my kilabytes alone.) and freebies don't put food on the table or pay the bills. I am going to try all three OS to decide which OS I like and then file my findings in my yahoo 360 blog. Have a merry christmas and a very happy new year. --- "Daniel A." wrote: > Do not forget Ubuntu Linux. > I am hearing good about it from a lot of people, so you should try to > run the LiveCD and see if you like it. > > On 12/25/05, Andy Sjostrom wrote: > > > > People please, > > I did not come in search of a debate as to which OS was better. I came in Search of a newer or > if > > you will, another choice in an OS. > > Two OS's which have been pointed out to me and look very promising are. > > 1. PC BSD > > 2. ALinux > > Both offer a lot, and I know as many people do that there is on one single OS that offers the > > perfect solution for everything. > > However I also know now something I did not know 24 hours ago. > > and that was that there are a wide range of choices that are availible and contrey to popular > > belief not all BSD and linux OS's are created the same. > > I also know now that William Gate is single individual who believes that the word "team" has > an > > "I" in it some place. > > Something that BSD & Linux knows does not exsist. After what William Gates and his Windows > have > > put me through over the last three years. You can be sure that which ever OS choose will be > > desined by a "TEAM" and not by some knit wit that works for team Gates. > > Now can someone put me in touch with The Insane clown Posie. I have a project in mind...LOL! > > Merry christmas to all and thank you for your help. > > > > > > . > > D&A Consultants > > George A. Sjostrom II > > Helping those who can help them selves > > http://www.geocities.com/andy_sjostrom/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________ > > Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. > > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > > dsl.yahoo.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > . D&A Consultants George A. Sjostrom II Helping those who can help them selves http://www.geocities.com/andy_sjostrom/index.html __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 19:35:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C3816A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:35:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreyns@tbd.ru) Received: from mail.tbd.ru (ns2.tbd.ru [217.17.178.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A2E43D46 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:35:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreyns@tbd.ru) Received: from mail.tbd.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tbd.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046584AF69 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:30:17 +0500 (YEKT) Received: from tbd.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tbd.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A4C4ACD9; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:30:14 +0500 (YEKT) From: "Sukharew Andrew" To: "mamaj m" , questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:30:14 +0500 Message-Id: <20051225192556.M34476@tbd.ru> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050228 X-OriginatingIP: 192.168.15.214 (andreyns@tbd.ru) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release X-Spamtest-Info: Pass through X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky SMTP-Gateway for FreeBSD 5.3 version 5.5.90/RELEASE, bases: 20051225 #163825, check: 20051225 clean Cc: Subject: Re: Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:35:05 -0000 On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:34:07 +0000, mamaj m wrote > Hi, > Please answer my question > > This is the first time i use Freebsd > So i want to configare the webmin on my server , i download the > webmin on a cd how can i configure the webmin on my Freebsd server > > Many Thanks > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's > FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Before ask, are you read documentation to the programm ? Go to http://www.webmin.com/index2.html and reading ! -- Sukharew Andrew System Administrator of State Institution "Research of Yamal" Russia Salekhard city Phone: (34922)3-09-77 š š š šš(34922)7-16-05 internal: š š 502,777 e-mail: andreyns@tbd.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 21:00:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40E216A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:00:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 899D743D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:00:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 67757 invoked from network); 25 Dec 2005 20:59:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (calartstech@sbcglobal.net@68.127.38.82 with plain) by smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Dec 2005 20:59:59 -0000 Message-ID: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:59:55 -0800 From: Jose Borquez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions group Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Uninstall Apache??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:00:01 -0000 I would like to know how you can uninstall Apache is it was installed from source? I did a search on Google and read that you could just stop the service and then delete the apache source tree. Is this true? Thanks in advance, Jose From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 21:15:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0656016A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:15:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk (pfepa.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A70D43D49 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:15:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from echobase.hoth.dk (echobase.hoth.dk [80.62.210.27]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B5347FEAA for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:14:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by echobase.hoth.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F1BBA19B3D; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:14:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:14:58 +0100 From: "Martin P. Hansen" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051225211458.GA62030@echobase.hoth.dk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Uninstall Apache??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:15:01 -0000 On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Jose Borquez wrote: > I would like to know how you can uninstall Apache is it was installed > from source? I did a search on Google and read that you could just stop > the service and then delete the apache source tree. Is this true? It probably depends on your definition of uninstall. Usually the service binaries are installed in /usr/local/bin or sometimes in paths like /usr/local/apache. Same goes for configuration files see also hier(7). So stopping the service and removing the source tree wont remove these. Some makefiles comes with an uninstall target, so you might try ``make uninstall''. Otherwise you can do a rebuild and reinstall from the sources again and look for recently changed files with something like ``find / -newerct "10 minutes ago"''. This probably have some shortcomings, but if you are careful it might do the job. -- Martin P. Hansen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 21:30:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C0816A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:30:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teoheras@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5721143D5F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:30:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teoheras@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1018892nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:30:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=NtXaJ0n/OpCh/mkSyqM8vHfm9pvMGHmyrfWMfAq/Oqe775fq/zoynBMnEMz38OOXTHVi1WAknKv8Bk2lQ0HsTbuJZYO3xYXLM6uZDacE07Pt19MzGTV0PqNWG8RwUeInOaVN8Ab44oot1eqkup3lGwpn/0hvEM1R6b9q90y6Xfs= Received: by 10.36.79.16 with SMTP id c16mr2570532nzb; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.147.15 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:30:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:30:28 -0500 From: Teo De Las Heras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: What is the M in tar Mcvf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:30:37 -0000 I looked through the man pages and online, but I can't find information on what the M is for in 'tar Mcvf'. I constantly see this as a way to archive / backup files. Teo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 21:50:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCE516A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:50:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D1843D5A for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:50:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a084.otenet.gr [212.205.215.84]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id jBPLoCgS027990; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:50:13 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7F249116E7; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:49:00 +0200 (EET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:49:00 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Danial Thom Message-ID: <20051225214900.GA1071@flame.pc> References: <20051225012143.GD1367@flame.pc> <20051225143322.86896.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051225143322.86896.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:50:20 -0000 On 2005-12-25 06:33, Danial Thom wrote: > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > On 2005-12-24 14:01, Danial Thom > > wrote: > > > Don Hinton wrote: > > > > For me, FreeBSD is about twice as fast - easy to install - > > > > configure, and infinitely cheaper. > > > > > > Considering that WinXP usually comes on the computer, I don't see > > > how "installing and configuring FreeBSD" can be easier than having > > > to do nothing at all? > > > > Windows XP comes preinstalled, yes. Not "preconfigured" too. It so > > happens that configuring a Windows XP system to match one's > > preferences has the potential to: > > > > a) Screw the machine up so completely and utterly that a > > reinstall is required. > > b) Take a lot of time. A huge lot of time, because of all the > > different 'driver' installation processes. > > Ate you claiming that someone not familiar with how to configure > FreeBSD can't screw it up beyond usefulness? No, I'm claiming that your Holy Grail of an OS is also flawed, in many of the ways that FreeBSD may be, in your opinion, flawed too. Since the original poster has explicitly stated that he is *NOT* interested in hearing why you think Windows is good for him, can we drop the subject already? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 22:16:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4269416A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:16:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AACB43D58 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:16:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:16:53 +0100 id 0003982E.43AF1A55.00006DCE Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:16:53 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051225221653.GA28062@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20051224225721.17983.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200512241801.28350.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512241801.28350.kstewart@owt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:16:55 -0000 On 24 Dec Kent Stewart wrote: > There is also the problem that some sites are designed to work with > Internet Explorer. You can try to visit with firefox but that doesn't > always work even with firefox on XP. NO site should be designed to work with IExplorer. I know it's done, but it should not! Why do we have W3C? If we could all just do things "by the book" the internet would be a much nicer place to visit. People who design for IExplorer are bad! They have microsoft in mind and _not_ the visitors. I hate it when choice gets violated! It should be called a crime against freedom. imho: sites designed for 'iexplorer only' should be banned ;-) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 22:24:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5786116A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:24:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from legalois@acm.org) Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr (smtp4.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D0643D5C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:24:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from legalois@acm.org) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6FE771C0020E for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:24:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (ADijon-151-1-118-143.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.51.152.143]) by mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2C4D21C00209 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:24:38 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20051225222438181.2C4D21C00209@mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr Message-ID: <43AF19B7.30203@acm.org> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:14:15 +0100 From: legalois User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051210) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> <20051225211458.GA62030@echobase.hoth.dk> In-Reply-To: <20051225211458.GA62030@echobase.hoth.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Uninstall Apache??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:24:40 -0000 Martin P. Hansen wrote: > On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Jose Borquez wrote: > >>I would like to know how you can uninstall Apache is it was installed >>from source? I did a search on Google and read that you could just stop >>the service and then delete the apache source tree. Is this true? > > > It probably depends on your definition of uninstall. Usually the > service binaries are installed in /usr/local/bin or sometimes in > paths like /usr/local/apache. Same goes for configuration files see > also hier(7). So stopping the service and removing the source tree > wont remove these. > > Some makefiles comes with an uninstall target, so you might try > ``make uninstall''. Otherwise you can do a rebuild and reinstall > from the sources again and look for recently changed files with > something like ``find / -newerct "10 minutes ago"''. This probably > have some shortcomings, but if you are careful it might do the job. > ...or you could read pkg_delete(1) and pkg_deinstall(1) and follow instructions. ("make uninstall" is not a valid target for any Makefile in the ports tree that I am aware of.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 22:30:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1B116A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:30:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C3C43D62 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:30:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:30:15 +0100 id 0003982E.43AF1D77.00006E1F Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:30:15 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051225223015.GA28169@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> <20051225211458.GA62030@echobase.hoth.dk> <43AF19B7.30203@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43AF19B7.30203@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: Uninstall Apache??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:30:18 -0000 On 25 Dec legalois wrote: > ("make uninstall" is not a valid target for any Makefile in the ports > tree that I am aware of.) It's sometimes done this way on linux systems ;-) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 22:49:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EEB16A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:49:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A2A43D5C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:49:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from echobase.hoth.dk (echobase.hoth.dk [80.62.210.27]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C362F5EE056 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:49:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by echobase.hoth.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8289719B3D; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:49:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:49:19 +0100 From: "Martin P. Hansen" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051225224919.GA63748@echobase.hoth.dk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> <20051225211458.GA62030@echobase.hoth.dk> <43AF19B7.30203@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43AF19B7.30203@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Uninstall Apache??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:49:21 -0000 On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, legalois wrote: > Martin P. Hansen wrote: > >On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Jose Borquez wrote: > > > >>I would like to know how you can uninstall Apache is it was installed > >>from source? I did a search on Google and read that you could just stop > >>the service and then delete the apache source tree. Is this true? > > > > > >It probably depends on your definition of uninstall. Usually the > >service binaries are installed in /usr/local/bin or sometimes in > >paths like /usr/local/apache. Same goes for configuration files see > >also hier(7). So stopping the service and removing the source tree > >wont remove these. > > > >Some makefiles comes with an uninstall target, so you might try > >``make uninstall''. Otherwise you can do a rebuild and reinstall > >from the sources again and look for recently changed files with > >something like ``find / -newerct "10 minutes ago"''. This probably > >have some shortcomings, but if you are careful it might do the job. > > > > ...or you could read pkg_delete(1) and pkg_deinstall(1) and follow > instructions. > ("make uninstall" is not a valid target for any Makefile in the ports > tree that I am aware of.) As I understand the question, ``source'' doesn't refer to a port, but rather the original apache source distribution. But ofcause if you are dealing with ports it is *much* easier to use the package features ;-) -- Martin P. Hansen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 23:04:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DA216A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:04:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C869F43D60 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:04:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 31709 invoked by uid 502); 25 Dec 2005 23:04:05 -0000 Received: from dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.97.72) by 0 with SMTP; 25 Dec 2005 23:04:05 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.97.72 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com Message-ID: <43AF2564.1020208@ywave.com> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:04:04 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Teo De Las Heras References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the M in tar Mcvf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:04:08 -0000 Teo De Las Heras wrote: > I looked through the man pages and online, but I can't find information on > what the M is for in 'tar Mcvf'. I constantly see this as a way to archive > / backup files. > > Teo That's a gnu tar option, not a bsd tar option. I did a google for gnu tar man and got http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man1/tar.1.html which will explain it. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 23:21:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CA716A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:21:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB23843D45 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:21:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from alpha.home (ppp149-82.lns3.adl2.internode.on.net [59.167.149.82]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jBPNLU0J095727 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:51:31 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:51:30 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512260951.30072.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: What is the M in tar Mcvf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:21:34 -0000 On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:00 am, Teo De Las Heras wrote: > I looked through the man pages and online, but I can't find > information on what the M is for in 'tar Mcvf'. I constantly > see this as a way to archive / backup files. I find it in the man pages without problems: -M --multi-volume Create/list/extract multi-volume archive But watch out -- this is gnu-tar and on the later FreeBSD OS (5.x+) appears as gtar (also as gtar in man pages). For BSD tar on 5.4 I find "There is not yet any support for multi-volume archives" Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 00:43:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5101816A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:43:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teilhk@crosswinds.net) Received: from cwpro1.crosswinds.net (cwpro1.crosswinds.net [69.28.227.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39B943D46 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:43:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teilhk@crosswinds.net) Received: from [201.127.10.40] (helo=fortunato) by cwpro1.crosswinds.net with smtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1EqgSO-000Auj-Kf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:43:20 -0500 Message-ID: <079f01c609b5$5d9f4f50$210110ac@fortunato> From: "Teilhard Knight" To: "FreeBDS" Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:43:18 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cwpro1.crosswinds.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crosswinds.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: PC-BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:43:33 -0000 Can PC-BSD be installed in a logical partition? I understand FreeBSD can only be installed in a primary partition. Teilhard. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 00:51:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC89216A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:51:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3471A43D69 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:51:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EqgZr-0006am-BF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:51:03 +0100 Received: from 221.236.163.179 ([221.236.163.179]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:51:03 +0100 Received: from zxpmyth by 221.236.163.179 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:51:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: heromyth Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:21:02 +0800 Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <70063950512161331u294280cdl8bd552be9426752c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 221.236.163.179 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: zh-cn,zh In-Reply-To: <70063950512161331u294280cdl8bd552be9426752c@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: how to dual boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:51:11 -0000 Marty Landman 写é“: > I'm trying to get a dual boot system set up with FBSD 5.3 and Win XP sp1. > First I installed FBSD using 15GB of the HD, then installed XP on the > remaining 5GB. However now it boots up XP automatically. I can get back to > the FBSD installer by booting from the 5.3 CD but what do I do to provide a > choice of which to boot right on the HD? Using Symantec BootMagic 8.0, you can boot FreeBSD and WinXp. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 01:00:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491FD16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:00:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp.wp.pl [212.77.101.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5ED43D4C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:00:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 1779 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2005 02:00:34 +0100 Received: from aed26.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO maslan) (maslan-freebsd@[83.16.107.26]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for ; 26 Dec 2005 02:00:34 +0100 Message-ID: <000901c609b7$d45abf60$1e00000a@maslan> From: "maslan-freebsd" To: "freebsd" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:00:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO AS1=NO(Body=1 Fuz1=1) AS2=YES(0.999997) AS3=NO AS4=NO Subject: Fw: how to dual boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:00:39 -0000 grub, standart freebsd boot menager... and a lot of otheres.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 02:33:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8321216A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:33:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CAF43D5C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:33:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id jBQ2Xcn4005528; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:33:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:33:37 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: RW Message-ID: <20051226023335.GD39217@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200512240716.29744.zettel@acm.org> <200512251450.14281.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512251450.14281.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Forth include ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:33:43 -0000 In the last episode (Dec 25), RW said: > On Saturday 24 December 2005 07:16, Leonard Zettel wrote: > > This undoubtedly is of no importance whatsoever, natheless this > > inquiring mind would like to know. > > > > The FreeBSD boot loader is written in Forth, which I happen to be > > able to read (sort of, anyway). EXCEPT the word "include" occurs in > > a number of places. I grant it is fair to middling obvious what it > > does. At the same time, I have not been able to find a definition > > for include in any of the reference materials I have on Forth. It > > is defninetly NOT ANS (or ISO) Forth (which specifies the words > > INCLUDE-FILE and INCLUDED). > > > > So 1) Can anybody give a stack picture for include ? > > 2) What version/dialect of Forth does FreeBSD use > > and is there any place I can get documentation on it? > > Looking through the source it appears it's not stricly speaking > Forth, but rather FICL. > > http://ficl.sourceforge.net/ > > FWIW I have seen include in older, pre-ansi, versions of forth. It looks like include is defined in /sys/boot/ficl/softwords/fileaccess.fr -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 03:05:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E590C16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:05:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39FF43D76 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:05:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1056109nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:05:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=WPivM2CaBE6lCNOyQ+be3EgWWd8riroAXBINlQy0EGQDz4S4CNRkRGoiLAG49nP6JRMR9rcAqYrNs6lsXIr7tG7/SHdWU8D31YeVxhAIMNarJtg5lkVnkPzaciIFpWMTm2cpkO98NZimjvJ6SXJwNX0j6kvpih2QyYJVisOL/9o= Received: by 10.37.15.25 with SMTP id s25mr2812215nzi; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:05:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?166.111.123.93? ( [166.111.123.93]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 34sm4525225nza.2005.12.25.19.05.00; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:05:03 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: "Jeff D. Hamann" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:57:41 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <001e01c609b0$df892900$0a00a8c0@mothra> In-Reply-To: <001e01c609b0$df892900$0a00a8c0@mothra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512261057.41524.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD + Wine + Office 2K X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:05:15 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 08:11, you wrote: > Does OpenOffice have an Access replacement that can read/write M$ access > files that can use VBA? I'm guessing not ready for prime time just yet and > until *nix get's one (with that cute little VBA debugger), then the rest of > us non-server-development-types will be stuck with our less savy co-workers > that use Excel and Word for *ALL* their computing needs. It's no good to be > the leader if nobody's willing to follow... > > If you can figure out how to get Office XP working with FreeBSD 6.0, please > let me know. sorry, i don't know much about office in Wine. Wish you can get it work :) anybody else knows about it? > > On Sunday 25 December 2005 22:48, you wrote: > > Merry Christmas! > > > > Although winehq.com is not altogether clear about it I get the impression > > from other sites that wine should be able to handle office 2000 without > > any > > problems. Some claim they have office XP and even office 2003 running on > > FreeBSD (http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~plug/mail_archive/0512/0046.html). I > > gave it a try with FreeBSD 6, Wine 0.9.4 and Office 2000 sp3 - > > unfortunately it would not even install properly. With wine in the win98 > > mode the installation gets stuck in 0% cpu activity, in the winXP mode it > > gets stuck in 100% cpu activity. Wine also does not allow me to do a > > 'custom' installation. A tree-structure with all the office items is > > shown, > > but it is not possible to check or uncheck any of those. As a consequence > > the whole suite is installed, including the 'forbidden' assistant. In > > win98 > > mode I have been able to get Word to open a file, more or less, and then > > had to kill wine to close the program. > > > > Is it actually possible to run office 2000 on FreeBSD? If so, I would > > appreciate some tips or hints. > > why not try openoffice? just a work around :) -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 03:05:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA0916A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:05:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD7243D72 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:05:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1056116nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:05:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=sgQBg420Tz7UgVjDoTbVDIvy4GpEYnYWf/MxKLnmtSVm3TY90IqjW3udD5pR/lHNMiqaAkUXty56FkSsfdSpi/bbuc/7gqkn4y4mtJnVjUYm3ab0oLAenspWSkz5XwZWkjmWCuP/uj6etLgB81ILqRsnNQaGsd1WepImpsiHqd4= Received: by 10.36.19.7 with SMTP id 7mr2825619nzs; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:05:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?166.111.123.93? ( [166.111.123.93]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 34sm4525225nza.2005.12.25.19.05.03; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:05:05 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:07:45 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512252205.33644.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AEB79D.9030200@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <43AEB79D.9030200@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512261107.45871.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:05:17 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 23:15, Erik N=F8rgaard wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > one more question > > since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address > > in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure fr= om > > time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default setting, > > which is as follows: > > > > what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my > > situation? > > Try to take a look at dhclient.conf(5) and dhclient(8) and set all > interfaces to be configured with dhcp. I think it should be posible to > configure default values so there is something to fall back on if a > lease is not obtained. > > Note that dhclient is new in FBSD 6, this is also why you had to take > down the other interface. The old dhclient would reset all dhcp > configured interfaces, the new doesn't, which is quite neat because > usually you would have the two interfaces connected to /different/ > networks. thanks for your explanations about DHCP in FreeBSD 6.0, although I still cannot find a way to config dhclient.conf to solve my problem :) instead, I figure out another way to work around. 1.ifconfig bge0 delete % this would shut my local NIC down totally 2.kldload if_ath dhclient ath0 then I can enjoy the wireless internet surfing :) antway, thank you again! =2D-=20 Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 03:16:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC7D16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:16:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from osastw@yahoo.com) Received: from web35701.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web35701.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A6EF43D5D for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:16:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from osastw@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 64940 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 03:16:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Sts2wkY3n+vCkCWcFG+dI/tHFODdhOOm0aRn+Q08AC1xZUCDvb1eHdbXlzYyG+ubl3zNgJq11FmhXJY/p2d1a08cA9SDvgGcYFV8nf7ejoNeym1sWcGbpS4v7ovvzVs/mcvEGWJjo66vET471xUAPXZAo9xGgq/U//0MlF7odJk= ; Message-ID: <20051226031638.64935.qmail@web35701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.209.15.234] by web35701.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:16:38 PST Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:16:38 -0800 (PST) From: TV JOE To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Compiling linux applications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:16:48 -0000 Hi, I've a C program written for Suse linux. I'm having minor problems compiling. First is that the cexp (complex exponent) is not available in /usr/include/math.h. Is it possible to add on a library that includes this function? I compile as 'gcc -lm program.c'. Additionally there is a timer program that creates this compile error GC.c: In function `gettime': GC.c:252: error: storage size of 'ltim' isn't known Here is gettime /********************************************************************/ // Functions start here. /********************************************************************/ // Function to read system time. Only used for testing execution speed. long int gettime(void) { struct timeval ltim; gettimeofday(<im, NULL); return (((long int)ltim.tv_sec)*((long int)(1000000))+((long int)ltim.tv_usec)); } I'm compiling on a 5.3 box. Thanks for any help, --------------------------------- Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 03:31:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0708116A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:31:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@amadeus.demon.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF0A43D62 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:30:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@amadeus.demon.nl) Received: from amadeus.demon.nl ([82.161.18.200]:57822 helo=[10.0.1.2]) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Eqj4b-0002T1-VL; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:30:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87hd8z6gbx.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> References: <87acey71y7.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> <87hd8z6gbx.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8443CD6F-E959-4738-9CBF-49942B26F777@amadeus.demon.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: freebsd-questions Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:30:56 +0100 To: Ludo Koren X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum: adding plex and subdisks to existing volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:31:00 -0000 On 23 dec 2005, at 15:25, Ludo Koren wrote: >>>>>> Arno Beekman writes: > >> On 18 dec 2005, at 18:24, Ludo Koren wrote: > > >>> Any help appreciated, I cannot find useful hints. >>> > > >> http://www.vinumvm.org/ http://www.freebsddiary.org/vinum.php >> man 4 vinum man 8 vinum >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/vinum- >> vinum.html http://devel.reinikainen.net/docs/how-to/Vinum/ > > maybe I was not enough specific. There is not enough information about > gvinum in the case. All you've mentioned is about vinum and there are > some diffrences; not all commands are implemented... BTW, the addition > of disk on 5.4-STABLE is causing panic. I posted the problem to the > freebsd-geom@freebsd.org. > > Regards, > > lk > hi Ludo, gvinum = vinum anything you need to do to add a new drive which is written on those sites can be done for gvinum as well... at least that's my experience if you follow the descriptions of replacing a disk and get panics there might be something else that's wrong Arno From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 04:07:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497C516A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:07:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zettel@acm.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09EB43D4C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:07:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zettel@acm.org) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (pcp0011427575pcs.sothfd01.mi.comcast.net[69.246.103.241]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20051226035505015004som7e>; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:55:05 +0000 From: Leonard Zettel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:56:55 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512240716.29744.zettel@acm.org> <200512251450.14281.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <20051226023335.GD39217@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20051226023335.GD39217@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512251556.56470.zettel@acm.org> Cc: Dan Nelson , RW Subject: Re: Forth include ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: zettel@acm.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:07:25 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 02:33 am, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Dec 25), RW said: > > On Saturday 24 December 2005 07:16, Leonard Zettel wrote: > > > This undoubtedly is of no importance whatsoever, natheless this > > > inquiring mind would like to know. > > > > > > The FreeBSD boot loader is written in Forth, which I happen to be > > > able to read (sort of, anyway). EXCEPT the word "include" occurs in > > > a number of places. I grant it is fair to middling obvious what it > > > does. At the same time, I have not been able to find a definition > > > for include in any of the reference materials I have on Forth. It > > > is defninetly NOT ANS (or ISO) Forth (which specifies the words > > > INCLUDE-FILE and INCLUDED). > > > > > > So 1) Can anybody give a stack picture for include ? > > > 2) What version/dialect of Forth does FreeBSD use > > > and is there any place I can get documentation on it? > > > > Looking through the source it appears it's not stricly speaking > > Forth, but rather FICL. > > > > http://ficl.sourceforge.net/ > > > > FWIW I have seen include in older, pre-ansi, versions of forth. > > It looks like include is defined in > /sys/boot/ficl/softwords/fileaccess.fr So it is! Thanks. Now all we need is a mention in the handbook about where all this can be found. -LenZ- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 04:19:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232E316A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:19:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF9743D49 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:19:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA89581; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:19:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:19:38 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Your Name In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20051225224720.V64415@tripel.monochrome.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Ripping CDs (was Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:19:19 -0000 On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Your Name wrote: [snip] > P.S. - I'm looking for a suggestion for a CD ripper; or perhaps I'm > not using KAudioCreator right. If I select all the tracks on a CD, it > blarfs when it is trying to rip the second or third track while > simultaneously converting the first track to .mp3 or whatever. I can't help you with the KDE stuff, but I've been happy with using cdda2wav to read a CD, then cdrecord to burn [both are in ports, part of sysutils/cdrtools]. lame [audio/lame] works well for making mp3s. However, I haven't tried making mp3s simultaeously with either reading or burning a CD. My computer is better at multitasking than I am. BTW, cdrtools is worth having; it also gives you mkisofs for creating burnable data CD images, plus some other useful-looking things that I don't know enough about to comment on. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/sysutils/cdrtools/pkg-descr HTH. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 05:30:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6807A16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:30:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C564843D46 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:30:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQ5XMP74819; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:33:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Joe Wood" , Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:30:02 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43ac30c8.4c135084.3b8c.ffffdbea@mx.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Quick, simple backup solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:30:06 -0000 What is wrong with this? I prefer the KISS principle with backups too. If your entire system fits on a DDS4 tape then what is wrong with this? Just put the statement in /etc/crontab and remember to change tapes. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Wood >Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:16 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Quick, simple backup solution > > >I am looking for a quick backup solution for my freebsd >machine. Currently I >backup to a DDS-4 DAT drive using the following while in "/": > > > >tar -zpcvf /dev/sa0 . > > > >I am aware of bacula, Amanda, cpio, and dump but to me tar is the ideal >method so if anyone had a simple script to automate this process I would >greatly appreciate some help in making my own. > > > >Thanks again, you guys are great!! > > > >Joe > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.7/214 - Release Date: >12/23/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 07:04:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600F916A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:04:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDCD43D46 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:04:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBQ73lRU060247 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:03:47 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBQ73hcu060246 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:03:43 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:03:43 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200512260703.jBQ73hcu060246@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: dlink wireless adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:04:49 -0000 how can i make my dlink DWL-G122 wireless usb adapter work with freebsd? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 07:44:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D0516A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:44:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teddyksbl@yahoo.com) Received: from web42109.mail.yahoo.com (web42109.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0D1D43D5F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:44:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teddyksbl@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 29632 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 07:44:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bXGo2xaEGGz/zpSQ5KYUzInmOUvgjeZQWmk3KWhYTyYFE5Sc5bhvwU82GRHESk9Ye+vFUHTLzSt3/iCAYKl0rd7z8F3N/i+HCuMdim9XhzFCCGokDFwBwg8LpLIXm/oRFsYzI1EFv08XtAIj0hH2U88mSge/2/REyoJbSo/rs/0= ; Message-ID: <20051226074408.29630.qmail@web42109.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [59.93.33.110] by web42109.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:44:08 PST Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:44:08 -0800 (PST) From: teddy n alias To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: help- From Teddy N. Alias, India X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:44:09 -0000 hello sir, My name is Teddy N. Alias i am working as a computer administrator in the M. A. College Kerala , India. i am try to get on a copy of FreeBsd for the last one year . i am try to downloadit from your site , but i face several pobs, each and every time............ i wish to study the os and to use in my Lab. so if you could kindly send me one copy FreeBSD. my address is given under; Teddy N. Alias Nirappukandathil -H- Chelad P.O. Karingzha Ernakulam -District- Kerala -State- India Pin 686 681 ph no - 9847132131 email id teddyksbl@yahoo.com pls help me................ --------------------------------- Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 08:42:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCC816A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:42:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D3C43D53 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQ8jJP75314; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:45:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Andy Sjostrom" , Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:41:59 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051224081054.29659.qmail@web31304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:42:07 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Andy Sjostrom >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 12:11 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: BSD Question's. > > >To whom this may concern, >H-E-L-P! > [diatribe against Windows deleted] > I have decided to start the search for a new OS. >In my case the new OS must be completely 100 percent user friendly. Impossible. > Is there any thing you can do to help me. Such as point me in >the right direction. > Yes, stay with Windows. Andy, here is the fundamental issue about operating system software. In a nutshell, the OS exists for 3 main tasks: 1) To provide a library of functions that an application developer can use to avoid having to reinvent the wheel when he is writing his applications. 2) To interface between raw computer hardware and the application programs, so that the application developer does not need to know how to program the 100+ soundcards out there for example. 3) To facilitate basic non-application tasks for the computer user, such as organizing files, connecting to the Internet, etc. Both the free OS's and the commercial OS's do item #1 well. But item's #2 and #3 are where the commercial operating systems like Windows are really advanced. Now, a user can get around #2 easily by simply swapping the hardware out, if the free OS of his choice does not play well with the hardware he has. But, # 3 is a big problem under any kind of UNIX because of a simple fact: UNIX allows you to solve a problem multiple different ways. It gives you a choice in how you want to solve a problem. Windows does not. Now, consider the process of buying a car. You go into Toyota and they have 3 kinds of cars. Cheap, medium, expensive. You just choose the one that fits your budget and drive away. You don't have to know anything about a car to do this. By contrast you go into a Chevy dealer and buy a car. You are given a list of 50 options that you can choose the car to have. The cost of the car is determined by what options you order. Well, now guess what, you actually have to know something about cars to buy one of those Chevys. It makes the process of buying a car a lot harder. Sure, you can get a Chevy tailored to exactly what you want - but you have to understand how to use the options you order, before you know if you want them or not. The Windows world is like a Toyota. You do things the way that Bill Gates has decided you need to do them. This makes it very easy to learn to use Windows because there is only 1 way to do something. Thus it is very user friendly, because anybody can just jump on and start using it. The Free OS world is like the Chevy. You really have to know a lot to get the value out of it. Once you do know a lot then you get a great deal of value from it, and you will not need the software to be "user friendly" But, getting to that point means a lot of work with what seems like little return. Windows has a low learning curve. It is easy to get to learn how to use it, but once you have learned the easy stuff and need to do more sophisticated stuff, you have to spend considerable time learning the intracies of an application. (like a spreadsheet) And none of that considerable knowledge is usable with any other application because all the apps do the sophisticated stuff differently. UNIX has a high learning curve. It is hard to learn how to use it, but once you have learned how to do the easy stuff in UNIX then you have to spend less and less time learning how to do the sophisticated stuff, because everything builds on each other, and all the apps take a similar approach in their intracies. Anyway, getting back to your situation. The stuff you have listed that you need to do with the computer is not sophisticated. So what will happen to you is you will start on that UNIX learning curve, get about 20% along, and realize that it would be easier to learn how to get Windows XP to work properly then do what you want to do, than to finish the UNIX learning curve. Consider that in your diatribe not once have you listed a problem with an APPLICATION. All your problems are with Windows. Yet, when you listed all the stuff you use the computer for, nothing in that list was "operating system stuff" If I could drop a version of Windows on your desk that ran perfectly, you would probably put all your apps on it like a shot and never look at a Free OS again. And to be perfectly honest about it, I -COULD- do such a thing, and so could a lot of other people. And, so could you if you spent the time learning how to run your Windows properly, from someone who knows, rather than just clicking away at things. Another way of saying this is your not running TO a system like FreeBSD, your running AWAY from a system like Windows. Nothing in the Free OS market is attracting you other than the possible thought you might not have as many problems with it, a thought which just shows you don't know anything about Free OS's. Anyway, that's the long and short of it. Now, I will finish up by saying that just about ALL of the real bleeding-edge stuff in computing today is happening in the Open Source world. Gaming, and heavy graphics work are exceptions, but with just about everything else, the normal progression is for the idea to happen in the Open Source world first, then migrate to Windows. And there's lots of stuff - like e-mail processing - that is so far ahead on the open source stuff that Windows isn't even trying to catch up. So it's not like spending the time learning the Free OS's would have no rewards. But, I just think that you wouldn't be interested enough in those rewards to spend the year or two needed to get over that learning curve. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 08:56:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F258616A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:56:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278E943D46 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:56:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09C52E047; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:56:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43AFB052.9070005@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:56:50 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051214) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuan Jue References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512252205.33644.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AEB79D.9030200@locolomo.org> <200512261107.45871.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512261107.45871.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:56:59 -0000 Yuan Jue wrote: > On Sunday 25 December 2005 23:15, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > >>Yuan Jue wrote: >> >>>one more question >>>since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address >>>in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure from >>>time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default setting, >>>which is as follows: >>> >>>what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my >>>situation? >> >>Try to take a look at dhclient.conf(5) and dhclient(8) and set all >>interfaces to be configured with dhcp. I think it should be posible to >>configure default values so there is something to fall back on if a >>lease is not obtained. >> >>Note that dhclient is new in FBSD 6, this is also why you had to take >>down the other interface. The old dhclient would reset all dhcp >>configured interfaces, the new doesn't, which is quite neat because >>usually you would have the two interfaces connected to /different/ >>networks. > > > thanks for your explanations about DHCP in FreeBSD 6.0, although I > still cannot find a way to config dhclient.conf to solve my problem :) Of course I guess you read the man-page, but maybe you didn't see this: The dhclient.conf file can be used to configure the behaviour of the client in a wide variety of ways: protocol timing, information requested from the server, information required of the server, defaults to use if the server does not provide certain information, values with which to override information provided by the server, or values to prepend or append to information provided by the server. The configuration file can also be preinitialized with addresses to use on networks that do not have DHCP servers. It appears you can set some default values: default { [option declaration] [, ... option declaration] } If for some set of options the client should use the value sup- plied by the server, but needs to use some default value if no value was supplied by the server, these values can be defined in the default statement. I would assume that if you set defaults this way, defaults will also take place if no lease is obtained at all - at least that would be very usefull. Something like this I guess: interface bge0 { default { fixed-address your-fixed-ip-here; subnet-mask your-fixed-subnet-mask-here; ... } } You might want to toggle timeout so defaults take effect faster. If both interfaces are configured with dhcp then dhclient will unconfigure the interface if there is no connection be it wired or wireless and the configuration of the working interface should take effect. However, in any case you should expect wierd things if both interfaces are up, and in particular for the same network. I don't know how dhclient handles that. Let me know if the above works, it's always good to have this kind of examples in the archive. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 09:27:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5B016A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:27:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B303243D5E for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:27:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQ9UUP75443; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:30:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Loren M. Lang" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:27:09 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051223234650.70105.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Yance Kowara , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:27:16 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Danial Thom [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 3:47 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang >Cc: Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections > > >Ted the incompetent, wrong on all counts once >again: > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >wrote: > >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Danial Thom >> [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >> >Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM >> >To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt >> >Cc: Yance Kowara; >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL >> connections >> > >> > >> >All upstream ISPs are >> >connected to everyone on the internet, so it >> >doesn't matter which you send your packets to >> >(the entire point of a "connectionless" >> network. >> >They both can forward your traffic to wherever >> >its going. >> >> They aren't going to forward your traffic >> unless >> it's sourced by an IP number they assign. To >> do otherwise means they would permit you to >> spoof IP >> numbers. And while it's possible some very >> small >> ISP's run by idiots that don't know any better >> might >> still permit this, their feeds certainly will >> not. > >Yes they will. I assure you they will not. >Routers route based on dest >address only. Are you somehow suggesting that an >ISP can't be dual homed and use only one link if >one goes down, since some of the addresses sent >up the remaining pipe wouldn't have source >addresses assigned by that upstream provider? ISP's that are dual-homed have to register their subnets with both providers. For example, suppose I'm a small ISP and I go get a Sprint connection and get assigned a range of 11 IP subnets, 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 These are Sprint-owned IP addresses of course. As I source traffic from 192.168.1.x, Sprint recognizes it as valid traffic and allows it to pass Sprint's ingress filter to me. Now I get a bit bigger and decide I need a redundant connection. So I contact ARIN and buy an AS number, then contact ATT and get a connection to them, then setup BGP between myself and ATT & Sprint. When ATT and I are setting up BGP, ATT's techs will ask me what subnets I'm advertising, I tell them 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 ATT then checks with ARIN's whois server to make sure Sprint has entered a record for that list of subnets that says I'm authorized to use them. If all that checks out OK then ATT adjusts their ingress filters so I can source traffic to them from those subnets. Now I get even bigger and need more IP's than what Sprint will provide, so I go to ARIN and buy them. Then all my feeds have to adjust their ingress filters to the new subnet. Now I get even more bigger and I start trying to setup peering relationships with other networks, so I don't have to pay them directly. Well now guess what, those networks are now monitoring the traffic volume I'm sending them, because they don't want me to use and abuse them and give them little peering in return. So I now have an enormous financial incentive to make sure that any traffic coming from any of my end users is in fact valid traffic, so you better believe I'm going to enforce that with ingress filters to my downstream customers. Anyway, this is all academic because the wrongly-sourced packet won't even get into my network to be forwarded and blocked by ATT or Sprint, or my peer routers, in the first place. Why? Because every wrongly-sourced packet I allow a customer to send to me, can potentially displace a correct packet from a customer, making their traffic slower and setting up potential for complaints. The ONLY Internet routers that don't igress filter today are transit routers run by transit ASs, and no network that is worth anything allows direct connections to those routers to their end-user customers. There is just too much potential for abuse, and even more potential for being blackholed as a rogue network by the rest of the Internet. Everybody today that knows anything about what they are doing, applies ingress filters, or they require their downstreams to ingress filter. In fact I'd say this is one of the reasons Cisco was disloged as the core router vendor by Juniper, because of the need for enough CPU in routers closer and closer to the core to be able to run access lists. Chances today that a cable line or a DSL line going to an end user could get a packet with a non-network source very far in to the Internet are zilch. One of the largest sources of bogus source IP numbers in fact are those cheap-as-shit DSL/Cable routers, as some of those models will ARP both their legal WAN IP address, and the LAN IP addresses, on their WAN port. All of the ActionTec routers do this in bridged mode, for example, and Qwest has thousands of them deployed. And the second largest source are infected PC's that have DDoS trojans on them, which some mothership has programmed to try to DDoS some poor bugger, with bougs sources. > You >are beyond clueless, Ted. Why do you keep opening >your mouth? > >> >> >For efficiencies sake, you may argue >> >that sending to the ISP that sent you the >> traffic >> >will be a "better path", but if one of your >> pipes >> >is saturated and the other running at 20% >> >> letsseenow, these are full duplex 'pipes', can >> we have some direction this saturation is >> taking >> place in? I mean, since you are at least >> trying to >> make a senseless explanation sound right, you >> might >> as well try a bit harder. > >Its not senseless, you just don't understand how >the internet works, apparently. I do this for a >living, and you just yap. > I pity your customers, frankly, since you aren't even familiar with basic anti-spoofing practices. If you really and truly do this for a living then almost certainly you do nothing with Internet routing and all your work is in corporate WANS. If that is the case then I pity your customers even more because any bozo on their network that gets a DDoS robot on it can take down their WAN. >If you were able to "send back" the data on the >"pipe it arrived on" then you would have uneven >use of the "pipes". So one could be saturation >the the other highly unused. That is correct, and that is in fact what happens and it is precisely why this rediculous attempt to "load balance" as you call it, does not work in real life. >Balancing the >outgoing data would reduce the latency that >occurs when a "pipe" is saturated. Its hard to >explain calculus to some who can't add or >subtract ted, so you should figure out how >routing works before you try something this >complicated. > It's hard to explain calculations when you don't know what they are. >> >> >then >> >its likely more efficient to keep your pipes >> >filled and send to "either" isp. You can >> achieve >> >this with per-packet load-balancing with >> ciscos, >> >> per packet load balancing is for parallel links >> between 2 endpoints. Not three, as in you, >> your first ISP, and your second ISP. > >Wrong again, Ted. Usually thats how it is used to >gain extra throughput, but thats not the only >thing that it can be used for. Since the internet >is connectionless (back to school for you Ted), >per packet balancing can utilize 2 outgoing pipes >to different ISPs as well. Obviously since >failover on dual-homed network works, you can >send your packets to any ISP you want. Routers >route based on destination address, as anyone who >knows how routers work knows. You can even use >per packet load balancing on 2 lines to the same >ISP when the other end doesn't support it; using >2 pipes in one direction and only one in the >other. You can be innovative when you actually >understand how things work, Ted. > Danial, this is really beyond humorous, I just think it's plain sad that you are so far out in left field. You have constructed a very long line of logic that is founded on a faulty premise - that ISP's today don't ingress filter - and you have just frankly gone off on it so far that I just can't do anything other than shrug and let you disappear into the distance. >> >> Surprising you would drag up a Ciscoism as >> your such a big fan of BSD-based routers. >> >> >or bit-balancing with a product like ETs for >> >FreeBSD. Unless your 2 isps are connected >> >substantially differently (say if one is in >> >Europe and one in the US), you'll do better >> >keeping your pipes balanced, as YOU are the >> >bottleneck, not the upstream, assuming you >> have >> >quality upstream providers. >> > >> >> Sometimes you run into someone who is so >> ignorant >> of the subject of which he is trying to speak, >> - routing in this case - that you can't even >> argue with the person. Kind of like trying to >> explain the concept of the fossil record to a >> creationist. This is one of these times. > >Yes Ted. People run into you, the ultimate >ignoramous. I have 3000 ISP customers. This is >not just theory; its being done. You are wrong >about every single thing you said in this thread. > Sigh. Danial, please, don't make yourself look any more foolish than you already have. It's painful. Even if your too stupid to ingress filter those 3000 hypothetical customers, those customers aren't going to waste the bandwidth that your charging them for, by sending you traffic that doesen't originate from their IP addresses. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 09:34:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5A016A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:34:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FFC43D86 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:33:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQ9atP75481; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:36:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Yance Kowara" , Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:33:35 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051224140859.54815.qmail@web30307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:34:01 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Yance Kowara >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 6:09 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections > > >> Ted, you have to think outside the box. Life is >> more than one connection. While you can't >> increase the throughput of a single connection, >> you can increase the throughput of your network, >> which is usually the point. "Throughput" in this >> context is "capacity". Throughput is not only >> what you can "get" on a download; its the sum >> total of all of your activites. >> >> You "can" upload at 2Mb/s on one connection if >> you balance your outbound traffic, but not >> download, because while you can control where >> outgoing packets are sent, you can't control >> over which pipe incoming traffic arrives. >> >> Believe me, ted. It works. Its not "theory". Its >> being done. For example a hosting ISP saturates >> its pipes outgoing and has very little traffic >> incoming. They can load balance in the outgoing >> only direction and have all of their incoming >> traffic on a single pipe and double the capacity >> of their network. Since they never exceed the >> incoming bandwidth of a single pipe there is no >> need to balance it. >> >> DT >> > >Ted and Daniel, > >I am still following this thread and am getting all >confused here. > >Back to my original question: 2 ADSL uplinks - 2 >different ISPs.... can they be merged? (Load balanced, >load shared, whatever it is) > No, as I already said, they can not. >OpenBSD's PF has something that looks promising: >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing >Is this what I am looking for? > Yance, I said no once, I'll say no again, you still don't believe me, please go set the thing up and see for yourself. As I said, set it up, plug one DSL line in, download the FreeBSD ISO, time it, plug the second DSL line in, download the FreeBSD ISO again, and measure the time it takes, there will be no difference. Then when your finished doing that, repeast the test but this time try uploading the ISO file to some remote server, with one line connected, then with both lines connected, and once again, you will see no difference. By that definition, no they are not merged/Load balanced/ load shared. If you have something else in mind, then load balancing, then maybe the software will do something that you want. But it will not load balance 2 lines to different ISP's. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 09:42:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0073316A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:42:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386BF43D5D for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:42:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQ9jeP75515; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:45:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Yance Kowara" , Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:42:20 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051224154805.1056.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:42:24 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Danial Thom >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:48 AM >To: danial_thom@yahoo.com; Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections > > > > >--- Danial Thom wrote: > >> >> >> --- Yance Kowara >> wrote: >> >> > > Ted, you have to think outside the box. >> Life >> > is >> > > more than one connection. While you can't >> > > increase the throughput of a single >> > connection, >> > > you can increase the throughput of your >> > network, >> > > which is usually the point. "Throughput" in >> > this >> > > context is "capacity". Throughput is not >> only >> > > what you can "get" on a download; its the >> sum >> > > total of all of your activites. >> > > >> > > You "can" upload at 2Mb/s on one connection >> > if >> > > you balance your outbound traffic, but not >> > > download, because while you can control >> where >> > > outgoing packets are sent, you can't >> control >> > > over which pipe incoming traffic arrives. >> > > >> > > Believe me, ted. It works. Its not >> "theory". >> > Its >> > > being done. For example a hosting ISP >> > saturates >> > > its pipes outgoing and has very little >> > traffic >> > > incoming. They can load balance in the >> > outgoing >> > > only direction and have all of their >> incoming >> > > traffic on a single pipe and double the >> > capacity >> > > of their network. Since they never exceed >> the >> > > incoming bandwidth of a single pipe there >> is >> > no >> > > need to balance it. >> > > >> > > DT >> > > >> > >> > Ted and Daniel, >> > >> > I am still following this thread and am >> getting >> > all >> > confused here. >> > >> > Back to my original question: 2 ADSL uplinks >> - >> > 2 >> > different ISPs.... can they be merged? (Load >> > balanced, >> > load shared, whatever it is) >> > >> > OpenBSD's PF has something that looks >> > promising: >> > >> >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing >> > Is this what I am looking for? >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > >> > Yance Kowara >> >> "merged" is not the correct word. You cannot >> change how your traffic comes in (ie from which >> ISP it arrives). You can use various techniques >> (source routing, static routing tables, load >> balancing) to increase your outgoing capacity. >> >> What you should be discussing is how you can >> use >> each of these techniques within a FreeBSd >> environment. Unfortunately we have to teach Ted >> how routing works in the meantime, which >> muddles >> the issue. >> >> DT > >As an example, I had a customer that had a T1 and >a T3 connection to different ISPs (they kept the >T1 because of the IPs they didn't want to >relinquish, and as a backup), and BGP worked on >hops at the time so clearly that doesnt work when >you have unbalanced pipes, because arguable the >T3 is always the "better" route). More baloney. The better route with BGP is the route with fewer AS hops not the one that goes out the biggest pipe. It is quite possible to have a T1 to a backbone that is very well connected (ie: uunet) and a DS3 to a backbone that is poorly connected (ie: Wiltel) and have all the inbound and outbound traffic favor the T1 Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 09:47:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11C816A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:47:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB17C43D5D for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:47:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQ9oWP75547; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:50:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Winelfred G. Pasamba" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:47:12 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051224155848.72649.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: pretenda@wrgn.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:47:29 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Danial Thom [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:59 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba >Cc: pretenda@wrgn.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections > > > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >wrote: > >> >> >http://www.edimax.com/html/english/products/PRI582.htm >> >> "...Performs Outbound load balancing by >> session, weight round robin or >> traffic..." >> >> Note that they say by SESSION not by PACKET. >> >> It's marketingspeak. They are simply using the >> term load balancing >> for a device that doesen't actually load >> balance. Apparently >> they figure that if they say "session load >> balancing" even though >> there is no such accepted definition, that then >> they are somehow not >> lying. >> >> It's akin to someone saying that "FreeBSD is a >> kind of Linux" in a >> sentence that uses Linux to indicate "open >> source operating systems" >> >> Apparently you never heard the old saying "A >> grain of truth is >> buried in all great lies" > >I'm not sure what your primary language is, but >"round robin" IS packet balancing. > In an engineers treatise, perhaps. but this is a marketing document and your just assuming that they mean "per packet" they could have easily meant that the sessions were round-robined. >Suppose you have 2 "pipes": > >Round Robin: > >1 packet to pipe1 >1 packet to pipe2 >1 packet to pipe1 >1 packet to pipe2 > >Weighted round Robin, weighted 2 to 1: > >1 packet to pipe1 >1 packet to pipe1 >1 packet to pipe2 >1 packet to pipe1 >1 packet to pipe1 >1 packet to pipe2 > >"Per session" balancing may be useful when you >have paths that are not very "equal". If you load >balance to different ISPs packets could arrive >out of order (in fact they are likely to). You cannot load balance to 2 different ISPs unless your running BGP I already went over this. Does this product speak BGP? Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 09:59:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4E316A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:59:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B124343D5A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:59:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQA30P76003; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:03:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Michael C. Shultz" , Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:59:39 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051224153412.26322.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: "Daniel A." , Andy Sjostrom Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:59:47 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Danial Thom >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:34 AM >To: Michael C. Shultz; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Cc: Daniel A.; Andy Sjostrom >Subject: Re: BSD Question's. > > > > >--- "Michael C. Shultz" >wrote: > >> On Saturday 24 December 2005 06:54, Daniel A. >> wrote: >> > Hi Andy, >> > >> > I am sorry for the trouble you have had with >> Windows XP. >> > >> > I suggest that you use Linux, as FreeBSD >> really is not targeted at >> > people who want to use graphical user >> interfaces. >> >> In a few key areas FreeBSD is a better desktop >> OS than Linux: Easier to keep >> the kernel/world and installed ports up to date >> for example without having >> to resort to the microsoft/Linux fixall method >> of removing and reinstalling >> everything every now and again. Your opinion >> is correct IMO that FreeBSD >> managers put most emphasis on FreeBSD as a >> server and little as a desktop. >> My guess is because donations(cash) and >> hardware support for developers >> come from people who want servers while people >> who want a desktop OS tend to >> donate squat.... >> >> > The linux developers really have been trying >> to make a valuable >> > replacement for Windows, as they somehow have >> experienced the same >> > issues with Windows (And Microsoft products >> in general) that you have. >> > >> > One Linux distribution in particular that I >> think you might like, is >> > Ubuntu. You can download it at >> http://www.ubuntulinux.org/, or order a >> > CD (Free shipping, free CD, you pay nothing). >> >> Advertising Linux in a FreeBSD mailing list? >> Sounds like you may have more of >> axe to grind against the FreeBSD management >> folk than a desire to offer sound >> advice.... >> >> -Mike > >Why not just tell the truth, which is that >Windows XP is the best that you can do for the >desktop, and that there is no perfect solution >that works perfectly in every scenario? This ignores a very important fact: the needs of a home user for a desktop OS are rapidly becoming very different than the needs of a corporation for a desktop OS. Windows XP is the best desktop OS you can have on the $499.99 computers that they sell with the operating system preloaded down at Best Buy, and that are purchased by the typical home user. But it is a serious problem for the average corporation. Many of them are deploying Microsoft Terminal Server and using Winterms, or Linux systems running remote desktop, terminal served into the TS. In this manner they can provide the user with access to the apps that they are trained on, such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, etc. in a controlled fashion that does not permit the user to download the latest virus-of-the-month, or crap-up their system with the latest screen-saver from the Weather channel that tanks the Internet connection every 3 minutes downloading a 1MB jpg file of the weather in San Francisco. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 10:01:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980AF16A422 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:01:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8BC43D70 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:01:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQA4RP76013 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:04:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:01:06 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051224110402.F7DE.GERARD@seibercom.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:01:16 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gerard Seibert >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 8:07 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: BSD Question's. > > >I have to agree with that statement. I have witnessed all too many >products start out with a good idea, build a solid product, and then >waste time and resources on trying to be all things to all people. In >the end they end up with a mediocre product. > You mean like Windows? Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 10:29:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC26E16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:29:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC6943D62 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:29:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQAWxP76119; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:33:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Gerard Seibert" , "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:29:38 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051224141049.Q64809@seibercom.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Using Sendmail to add headers to mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:29:43 -0000 Yes it is, to do this you use a milter program. You can write one or perhaps use this one: http://www.roaringpenguin.com/penguin/open_source_mimedefang.php which has the capability to add boilerplate. (I don't know if it can add your x-header where you want it, though) Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gerard Seibert >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 11:23 AM >To: FreeBSD Questions >Subject: Using Sendmail to add headers to mail > > >I am not sure if this is possible or not. Is it possible to add custom >'X-' headers to mail using Sendmail? For instance, suppose I >wanted to add >the Habeas Headers to all my outgoing >email. Is >it possible to do via Sendmail, or can this only be accomplished via my >MUA? > >I noticed on the Habeas site that there was a configuration for >Exim, if >that means anything. > > >-- >Gerard >gerard@seibercom.net > > _... > o_.-"` `\ > .--. _ `'-._.-'""-; _ > .' \`_\_ {_.-a"a-} _ / \ > _/ .-' '. {c-._o_.){\|` | > (@`-._ / \{ ^ } \\ _/ > `~\ '-._ /'. } \} .-. > |>:< '-.__/ '._,} \_/ / ()) > | >:< `'---. ____'-.|(`"` > \ >:< \\_\\_\ | ; > \ \\-{}-\/ \ > \ '._\\' /) > '. /( > `-._ _____ _ _____ __.'\ \ > / \ / \ / \ \ \ > jgs _.'/^\'._.'/^\'._.'/^\'.__) \ > ,==' `---` '---' '---' ) > `"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""` >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.7/214 - Release Date: >12/23/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 11:04:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E15B16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:04:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C40843D96 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:04:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBQB7lP76204; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:07:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "dick hoogendijk" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:04:26 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20051225135429.GA26359@lothlorien.nagual.st> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:04:56 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of dick hoogendijk >Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 5:54 AM >To: freebsd-questions >Subject: Re: BSD Question's. > > >On 24 Dec Danial Thom wrote: >> Schwab Streetsmart >> Accounting Software (CA) >> Quicken >> Photoshop >> Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs) >> >> Those are the ones I use daily. Surely there are >> some half-assed alternatives for some of these, >> but if I have to use something inferior to use >> FreeBSD then thats a point against it. > >NO. It's not a point against the OS. It merely demonstrates why lots of >people stay with windows. NOT because the OS is better, but its support >by *third party soft-hardware* is better. > >Windows itself (the OS) is worse than FreeBSD (imho). Those 3th party >people are responsable for the leading role of microsoft. >Not MS itself. > No, not really. It's circumstances that are responsible for the leading role of Microsoft. Remember, Windows still has DOS in it, and DOS is about 10 years older than FreeBSD. Microsoft got a big head start at the right time. I wouldn't worry about it, though. Truth is that the computer market has fundamentally changed. It's now a market that caters to the unwashed masses, and such markets naturally fall into either a monopoly, or a level of standardization that there's minor product differentiation between the leaders, so they may as well be a monopoly. Take the automobile market, fundamentally most passenger vehicles look and act the same, burn the same fuel, use the same tires/batteries/ etc. and cost the same. Same with the soft drink market, same with the cell phone market, etc. etc. In order for UNIX to become the dominant OS it would have to change to be almost exactly like Windows, and would certainly have to be completely compatible, able to run Windows binaries out of the box, etc. OS/2 was like this at one time, if you remember. You would end up with 2 similar operating systems, one made by Microsoft the other made by RedHat (or whoever) and essentially the same thing. If Digital Research had caught on early enough, we would have had DOS and DR-DOS pretty much equivalent markets. That would have ended up with equivalent Windows 3.1's and later Windows 95's. We really are better off with UNIX in the minority, that gives it a freedom to explore new ideas that Windows lacks. It's no surprise that most of the eye candy in Windows today was ripped off of various X window managers. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 11:29:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5529616A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:29:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jakels@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.fr (smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFA943D53 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:29:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jakels@xs4all.nl) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 460A71FFFFD1 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:29:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (ADijon-151-1-118-143.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.51.152.143]) by mwinf0104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0BABB1FFFFAA for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:29:33 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20051226112934479.0BABB1FFFFAA@mwinf0104.wanadoo.fr Message-ID: <43AFD1AE.5060702@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:19:10 +0100 From: jakels User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-questions References: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> <20051225211458.GA62030@echobase.hoth.dk> <43AF19B7.30203@acm.org> <20051225223015.GA28169@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20051225223015.GA28169@lothlorien.nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Uninstall Apache??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:29:37 -0000 dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 25 Dec legalois wrote: > >>("make uninstall" is not a valid target for any Makefile in the ports >>tree that I am aware of.) > > > It's sometimes done this way on linux systems ;-) > This is useful to someone working with a BSD o.s....how, exactly? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 11:43:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFE916A425 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:43:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C16643D6A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:43:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6679D210176 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:43:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32644-02-2 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:43:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CBE2210168 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:43:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBQBhYKA093170 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:43:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:43:37 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: References: <20051224141049.Q64809@seibercom.net> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051226064330.53EE.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="===[S/MIME_RFC2633]===43AFD761.2FCD4DC==="; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Using Sendmail to add headers to mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:43:45 -0000 --===[S/MIME_RFC2633]===43AFD761.2FCD4DC=== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, December 26, 2005 5:29:38 AM "Ted Mittelstaedt" Subject: RE: Using Sendmail to add headers to mail Wrote these words of wisdom: >=20 > Yes it is, to do this you use a milter program. >=20 > You can write one or perhaps use this one: >=20 > http://www.roaringpenguin.com/penguin/open_source_mimedefang.php >=20 > which has the capability to add boilerplate. (I don't know if it > can add your x-header where you want it, though) >=20 > Ted >=20 > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gerard Seibert > >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 11:23 AM > >To: FreeBSD Questions > >Subject: Using Sendmail to add headers to mail > > > > > >I am not sure if this is possible or not. Is it possible to add custom > >'X-' headers to mail using Sendmail? For instance, suppose I > >wanted to add > >the Habeas Headers to all my outgoing > >email. Is > >it possible to do via Sendmail, or can this only be accomplished via my > >MUA? > > > >I noticed on the Habeas site that there was a configuration for > >Exim, if > >that means anything. > > > > > >-- > >Gerard > >gerard@seibercom.net > > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: Thanks Ted. I took a quick look at it; however, I do not think it is exactly what I need though. I will have to take a closer look later. --===[S/MIME_RFC2633]===43AFD761.2FCD4DC=== Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIKEAYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIKATCCCf0CAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCCCMkw ggJRMIIBuqADAgECAgMPeOEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoT HFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA1MDkxMzE2MDUwNloXDTA2MDkxMzE2MDUwNlowRjEfMB0G A1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEjMCEGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYUZ2VyYXJkQHNlaWJl cmNvbS5uZXQwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAKNoN++UfUt9hlNLErk3m6fIzCDF wmFEnhlh4uU2kdmL/wOGOonGTwGYBB7GaILJxkLS7o2IxKl2qnBUCqVP7uJ94UkHcyP2C7WT0fR1 /PaOu+NX77DZiWu+7MLCL8j4MmkUVsGdgLZA9aLl2fZJg/MRn4F+aycFbjzcIUK7BcXvAgMBAAGj MTAvMB8GA1UdEQQYMBaBFGdlcmFyZEBzZWliZXJjb20ubmV0MAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZI hvcNAQEEBQADgYEAKgPoe+N+nikyTgE9D6rLBygf25pks09Nm61lNFCayERnUG/wF+V40/msujKE MNTJBRt3jcIeLrFKYZLvntbPqS3ecusRBqmNwY75pnz6fdWW/oZUy8CMAZjn2nFz0WizIt+AyOm4 iP4yoCBCS3KiyDP1embBJlKuhy6gc+Gr/9swggMtMIIClqADAgECAgEAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUA MIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRv d24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNl cnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzAp BgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNOTYwMTAxMDAwMDAw WhcNMjAxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTES MBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMf Q2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFs IEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29t MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDUadfUsJRkW3HpR9gMUbbqcpGwhF59LQ2PexLf hSV1KHQ6QixjJ5+Ve0vvfhmHHYbqo925zpZkGsIUbkSsfOaP6E0PcR9AOKYAo4d49vmUhl6t6sBe duvZFKNdbnp8DKVLVX8GGSl/npom1Wq7OCQIapjHsdqjmJH9edvlWsQcuQIDAQABoxMwETAPBgNV HRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAMfskn5O+PWWpWdiKqTwTRFg0G+NYFhhrCa7 UjVcCM8w+6hKloofYkIjjBcP9LpknBesRynfnZhe0mxgcVyirNx54+duAEcftQ0o6AKd5Jr9E/Sm 2Xyx+NxfIyYJkYBz0BQb3kOpgyXy5pwvFcr+pquKB3WLDN1RhGvk+NHOd6KBMIIDPzCCAqigAwIB AgIBDTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2Fw ZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UE CxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNv bmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUu Y29tMB4XDTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoXDTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNV BAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25h bCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDEpjxVc1X7 TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31W/Iadr1/DDph8r9RzgHU5VAKMNcCY1osiRVwjt3J8CuFWqo/ cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3PQO+K/67GD4Hv0CAAmTXp6a7n2XRxSpUhQ9IBH+nttE8YQRA HmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwQwYDVR0fBDwwOjA4oDagNIYy aHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29tL1RoYXd0ZVBlcnNvbmFsRnJlZW1haWxDQS5jcmwwCwYDVR0P BAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwyLTEzODANBgkqhkiG 9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oLLswNo2asZw9/r6y+whehQ5aUnX9MIbj4Nh+qLZ82L8D0HFAgk3A8 /a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsAxRoLgnSeJVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3dqZw5jowgT2Vfldr394fWxghOrvbqNOUQ Gls1TXfjViF4gtwhGTXeJLHTHUb/XV9lTzGCAQ8wggELAgEBMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMPeOEwCQYFKw4DAhoFADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASB gI1bO9dFdBVQCgGyfyMqmlTyJQD7p6BJysiRTltMUVWcDfc9v2FlNkPnwtdF0mhoLf0EVm1BmE5i dNYtdAn7HYZt1dv7z4M4xbE6LW+CphqIfPryHY6VD38ZUAdUme6B6mTKexVeX/e1Q/+G2zhQBhjl P1lzVBIBrUchXYNpwp0z --===[S/MIME_RFC2633]===43AFD761.2FCD4DC===-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 12:57:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F55716A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrb@bmyster.com) Received: from bmyster.com (ns1.bmyster.com [65.175.135.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C6843D5F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:57:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrb@bmyster.com) Received: from www.bmyster.com (localhost.bmyster.com [127.0.0.1]) by bmyster.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBQCvCg0065062 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:57:12 -0500 (EST) From: "Brent" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:57:07 -0500 Message-Id: <20051226125401.M45114@bmyster.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 24.75.245.190 (mrb) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: NIS versus LDAP authentication X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:57:16 -0000 We are getting ready to migrate from a single super server solution to a group of Freebsd servers doing seperate tasks...I was wondering whats everyones opinions on NIS versus LDAP for authentication ...and if anyone can point me at any good howto's for both NIS or LDAP in a multi server environment on Freebsd? thank you for your help & Merry Christmas -- Brent Bailey CCNA Bmyster LLC --RIP Brother Dime-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 13:01:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E892516A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:01:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrb@bmyster.com) Received: from bmyster.com (ns1.bmyster.com [65.175.135.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EF243D5A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:01:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrb@bmyster.com) Received: from www.bmyster.com (localhost.bmyster.com [127.0.0.1]) by bmyster.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBQD1fpE065511 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:01:41 -0500 (EST) From: "Brent" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:01:36 -0500 Message-Id: <20051226125816.M29545@bmyster.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 24.75.245.190 (mrb) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: mail spool in user dir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:01:43 -0000 Is there a way to make users spool mailbox be in the user dir instead of in /var/mail/ ?? We are using sendmail w/ local mailer being procmail. As well as we use Openwebmail for a webmail interface . thank you for all your help Merry Christmas ? -- Brent Bailey CCNA Bmyster LLC --RIP Brother Dime-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 13:04:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C9F16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:04:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C0343D7D for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:04:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493BC2E047; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:04:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43AFEA60.5010709@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:04:32 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051214) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brent References: <20051226125401.M45114@bmyster.com> In-Reply-To: <20051226125401.M45114@bmyster.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NIS versus LDAP authentication X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:04:46 -0000 Brent wrote: > We are getting ready to migrate from a single super server solution to a group > of Freebsd servers doing seperate tasks...I was wondering whats everyones > opinions on NIS versus LDAP for authentication ...and if anyone can point me > at any good howto's for both NIS or LDAP in a multi server environment on Freebsd? I think that unless you have a legacy NIS server to support, LDAP is the way to go. "LDAP system administration" from O'Reilly is a good book that tells you how to migrate your users and groups to LDAP and even how to migrate NIS to LDAP. http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/ldapsa/index.html The book is more a practical guide on how to instead of getting lost in technicalities and history. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 13:05:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0603316A427 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:05:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrb@bmyster.com) Received: from bmyster.com (ns1.bmyster.com [65.175.135.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889C743D9A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:05:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrb@bmyster.com) Received: from www.bmyster.com (localhost.bmyster.com [127.0.0.1]) by bmyster.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBQD5Y5L065702 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:05:35 -0500 (EST) From: "Brent" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:05:29 -0500 Message-Id: <20051226130206.M64642@bmyster.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 24.75.245.190 (mrb) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: backups spanning tapes help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:05:58 -0000 We use a freebsd box that has a old 8mm library drive attached that we use for backups..my question is these tapes hold 7gigs native or 14 gig compressed ..One i cant seem to get compression going so i was wondering how do you span tapes using tar ? Unless theres another way to do this thank you for your help & Merry Christmas -- Brent Bailey CCNA Bmyster LLC --RIP Brother Dime-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 13:23:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D29D16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:23:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C4443D49 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:23:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:10029 helo=assata.aseed.net) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EqsK4-000K1A-2S; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:23:32 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (http.aseed.antenna.nl [192.168.0.50]) by assata.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC84154FCF; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:25:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D42E58C604; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:24:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:23:20 +0100 From: albi To: "Brent" Message-Id: <20051226142320.b90b510d.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <20051226125816.M29545@bmyster.com> References: <20051226125816.M29545@bmyster.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail spool in user dir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:23:37 -0000 On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:01:36 -0500 "Brent" wrote: > Is there a way to make users spool mailbox be in the user dir instead > of in /var/mail/ ?? We are using sendmail w/ local mailer being > procmail. must be possible to set that in your procmail-settings, but changing the MAIL-env. in /etc/login.conf is also an idea (check "man login.conf" and "man cap_mkdb") for maildir it looks like this in my /usr/local/etc/procmailrc : DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ ORGMAIL=$HOME/Maildir/ MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ perhaps "man procmailex" shows options for mbox-format style delivery > As well as we use Openwebmail for a webmail interface . yes, you have to change this in the config of Openwebmail as well -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 13:28:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7999916A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C3643D49 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:28:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBQDRax4006312 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:27:37 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:28:13 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051224225721.17983.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200512241801.28350.kstewart@owt.com> <20051225221653.GA28062@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20051225221653.GA28062@lothlorien.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512260528.14110.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:28:16 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 02:16 pm, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 24 Dec Kent Stewart wrote: > > There is also the problem that some sites are designed to work with > > Internet Explorer. You can try to visit with firefox but that > > doesn't always work even with firefox on XP. > > NO site should be designed to work with IExplorer. I know it's done, > but it should not! Why do we have W3C? If we could all just do things > "by the book" the internet would be a much nicer place to visit. > > People who design for IExplorer are bad! They have microsoft in mind > and _not_ the visitors. I hate it when choice gets violated! It > should be called a crime against freedom. I have seen some that don't work properly except with IE but the only=20 sites I have encountered that demand IE are online banking. They seem=20 to only understand how to let you login securely using IE. There are some sites such as Tyco that only work with Mozilla style=20 browsers. It depends on the push techology built into Mozilla style=20 browsers. You can see what the Navy Observatory time is but the=20 automated gif only works with the mozilla products. See http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/what1.html Each browser has some technology that they depend on and you have to use=20 that browser before you can use their services. The 80/20 rule probably=20 applies because the banks can program for IE and get 85% of the people=20 without trippling their web development costs. Kent > > imho: sites designed for 'iexplorer only' should be banned ;-) =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 13:38:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C0116A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:38:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15B743D5A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:38:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7975415005F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:38:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27358-01-12 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:37:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id EBE5315005E for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:37:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBQDbuN5093657 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:37:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:37:59 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <200512260528.14110.kstewart@owt.com> References: <20051225221653.GA28062@lothlorien.nagual.st> <200512260528.14110.kstewart@owt.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051226083404.8C5A.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:38:05 -0000 On Monday, December 26, 2005 8:28:13 AM Kent Stewart Subject: Re: BSD Question's. Wrote these words of wisdom: > On Sunday 25 December 2005 02:16 pm, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > On 24 Dec Kent Stewart wrote: > > > There is also the problem that some sites are designed to work with > > > Internet Explorer. You can try to visit with firefox but that > > > doesn't always work even with firefox on XP. > > > > NO site should be designed to work with IExplorer. I know it's done, > > but it should not! Why do we have W3C? If we could all just do things > > "by the book" the internet would be a much nicer place to visit. > > > > People who design for IExplorer are bad! They have microsoft in mind > > and _not_ the visitors. I hate it when choice gets violated! It > > should be called a crime against freedom. > > I have seen some that don't work properly except with IE but the only > sites I have encountered that demand IE are online banking. They seem > to only understand how to let you login securely using IE. > > There are some sites such as Tyco that only work with Mozilla style > browsers. It depends on the push techology built into Mozilla style > browsers. You can see what the Navy Observatory time is but the > automated gif only works with the mozilla products. See > http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/what1.html > > Each browser has some technology that they depend on and you have to use > that browser before you can use their services. The 80/20 rule probably > applies because the banks can program for IE and get 85% of the people > without trippling their web development costs. > > Kent > > > > > imho: sites designed for 'iexplorer only' should be banned ;-) > > -- > Kent Stewart > Richland, WA ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: I belong to a HS Officials Association. The entire BOCES site, where I can confirm assignments, etc., is written in VB. I can only use IE to access that site. I have spoken to the director of BOCES operations, and they informed me that there was no way they were going to change the site. It cost them many $thousands$ of dollars to have set up. I do have to admit that it works flawlessly though. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 13:49:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C9A16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:49:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1156B43D4C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:49:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from alpha.home (ppp144-75.lns3.adl2.internode.on.net [59.167.144.75]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jBQDnsoG088169; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:19:55 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:19:49 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20051226031638.64935.qmail@web35701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051226031638.64935.qmail@web35701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512270019.49456.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: TV JOE Subject: Re: Compiling linux applications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:49:58 -0000 On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:46 pm, TV JOE wrote: > Hi, > > I've a C program written for Suse linux. I'm having minor > problems compiling. First is that the cexp (complex exponent) > is not available in /usr/include/math.h. Is it possible to add > on a library that includes this function? I compile as 'gcc > -lm program.c'. > Mathematically the complex exponent is exp(real_part)*(cos(imag_part)+i*sin(imag_part) and by the standard has the prototype: #include double complex cexp(double complex z); So you can easily define it for yourself: #include #include double complex cexp(double complex z){ return exp(creal(z))*(cos(cimag(z)) + sin(cimag(z))*I); } Or even perhaps as a macro: #include #include #define cexp(z) (exp(creal(z))*(cos(cimag(z)) + sin(cimag(z))*I)) > Additionally there is a timer program that creates this > compile error > > GC.c: In function `gettime': > GC.c:252: error: storage size of 'ltim' isn't known > > Here is gettime > > /************************************************************* >*******/ // Functions start here. > /************************************************************* >*******/ > > // Function to read system time. Only used for testing > execution speed. long int gettime(void) > { > struct timeval ltim; This is easy; you don't have the definition of the struct timeval in scope. It is defined in So add #include near the beginning of the source file. Malcolm > > gettimeofday(<im, NULL); > return (((long int)ltim.tv_sec)*((long > int)(1000000))+((long int)ltim.tv_usec)); } > > > I'm compiling on a 5.3 box. Thanks for any help, > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 13:58:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0D516A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:58:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF5643D62 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:58:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:58:53 +0100 id 00039832.43AFF71D.00000691 Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:58:53 +0100 From: dick hoogendijk To: fbsdq Message-Id: <20051226145853.b9181d5d.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <43AFD1AE.5060702@xs4all.nl> References: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> <20051225211458.GA62030@echobase.hoth.dk> <43AF19B7.30203@acm.org> <20051225223015.GA28169@lothlorien.nagual.st> <43AFD1AE.5060702@xs4all.nl> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.9 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Uninstall Apache??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:58:56 -0000 On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:19:10 +0100 jakels wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > > On 25 Dec legalois wrote: > > > >>("make uninstall" is not a valid target for any Makefile in the > >>ports tree that I am aware of.) > > > > It's sometimes done this way on linux systems ;-) > > This is useful to someone working with a BSD o.s....how, exactly? NOT. Have you missed the smiley? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 14:04:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4954E16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:04:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D9543D55 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:04:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from alpha.home (ppp144-75.lns3.adl2.internode.on.net [59.167.144.75]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jBQE4fYr017546; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:34:42 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:34:36 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20051226031638.64935.qmail@web35701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200512270019.49456.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200512270019.49456.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512270034.36308.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: TV JOE Subject: Re: Compiling linux applications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:04:45 -0000 On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:19 am, Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:46 pm, TV JOE wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've a C program written for Suse linux. I'm having minor > > problems compiling. First is that the cexp (complex > > exponent) is not available in /usr/include/math.h. Is it > > possible to add on a library that includes this function? I > > compile as 'gcc -lm program.c'. I should have noticed before -- you are in danger of of required parts of the library not being loaded unless you place the '-lm' at the end of the command line (unlike most unix utilities/applications). Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 14:15:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DB216A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:15:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC5A43D58 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:15:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1143771nzo for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:15:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=T5nX4FTLaDGwsEI4yDrVKm3Q/HrkdAYj52302M12Q4rI7Tb3nsiFJFTEC+MvU4qpPuJIZTNveaRZyUOA4pmAiGKzFP4gXmDS91m7HNCwhH/TB3HUOewxjvSyvdm46nOFWnlnrqXkCM0KMZCd7wIeH4O7DoHkJ159Jccxn5HzMNc= Received: by 10.36.250.48 with SMTP id x48mr3301130nzh; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:15:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 5sm5451292nzk.2005.12.26.06.15.47; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:15:50 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:18:30 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260036.00517.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260209.44561.kjelderg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512260209.44561.kjelderg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512262218.30970.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Kjeldergaard Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:15:52 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 01:09, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > > > > is there any software that like Rainlender on Windows? I need to make > > > > some notes sometimes, and i think it would be much better if the > > > > notes could be always shown on the desktop to remind me. Kontact is > > > > great, but not at this point :( > > > > > > Do you perhaps mean something like kde's knotes? > > > > thanks for your reply. knotes does its work, but not that well as > > Rainlender. I mean its look and interface. can knote be transparent? > > Sure, kwin can make any application transparent. It appears that knotes on > my system just magically is translucent, probably because it is a dock > window, but you can set this more specifically for knotes by setting > "window specific settings" for the window class knotes. Hope this helps, I just found a software called gDesklets which I think is wonderful. you can find it in http://gdesklets.gnomedesktop.org/categories.php?func=gd_show_app&gd_app_id=191 it is a WeeklyCalendar. almost fulfill my demand -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 14:32:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC0316A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:32:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B7243D5E for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:32:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s1so530912nze for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:32:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=bDb6vtR3PnlZt9Z21mFgKG/ioJTLzxTEgPCGMVS6016bOsMlzf7eaAV1QCNyc0bf8SifvYXdUW20rQ33LDYSxJiHtm7QPpxkvcWMX0xGwSWSC4X95hY7/A/AZ0u4y3MHaH/Tl06a1e2GTfJC/lwF3y7kNpFlWo9Rx7R/aiIWPc0= Received: by 10.36.221.56 with SMTP id t56mr3225690nzg; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:32:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.86? ( [221.186.3.89]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 18sm2671378nzo.2005.12.26.06.32.22; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:32:23 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: Yuan Jue , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:32:12 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260209.44561.kjelderg@gmail.com> <200512262218.30970.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512262218.30970.yuanjue02@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1920215.o5K417rI1U"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512262332.18703.kjelderg@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:32:33 -0000 --nextPart1920215.o5K417rI1U Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 26 December 2005 23:18, Yuan Jue wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 01:09, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > > > > > is there any software that like Rainlender on Windows? I need to > > > > > make some notes sometimes, and i think it would be much better if > > > > > the notes could be always shown on the desktop to remind me. > > > > > Kontact is great, but not at this point :( > > > > > > > > Do you perhaps mean something like kde's knotes? > > > > > > thanks for your reply. knotes does its work, but not that well as > > > Rainlender. I mean its look and interface. can knote be transparent? > > > > Sure, kwin can make any application transparent. It appears that knotes > > on my system just magically is translucent, probably because it is a do= ck > > window, but you can set this more specifically for knotes by setting > > "window specific settings" for the window class knotes. Hope this help= s, > > I just found a software called gDesklets which I think is wonderful. > you can find it in > http://gdesklets.gnomedesktop.org/categories.php?func=3Dgd_show_app&gd_ap= p_id >=3D191 it is a WeeklyCalendar. almost fulfill my demand Ah, if you are after something like gdesklets, kde seems to have SuperKaram= ba=20 (ports deskutils/superkaramba) which embeds scripts into the desktop in=20 almost the same way. Not sure if you are still looking for something=20 different or if you are satisfied with what you have now, Eric =2D-=20 The signature is a location used to give a personalised feel to each E-mail= =20 without having to personalise each E-mail. --nextPart1920215.o5K417rI1U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDr/7ySMnO3Fce5JgRAllPAKCEHfRhmlxBEO8a3Kp4MsgYr24t2wCfQ5+B KMFzQhodLcL2a7AxgGPxDdQ= =1UQD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1920215.o5K417rI1U-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 14:46:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9150116A420 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:46:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C3643D64 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:46:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so485329nzb for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:46:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=I7/Q5RODeERymVLKAPdJwn5v1EsH1eoiwATpb3HTj3piKbSphtinbDIZD5cbibZs4nVYxlXR8kyELHEzvNVwVUqAcuaNhlOaM0a5idGuN0sn6rGXIG9W3cKDygfuQ/LdLnYnd5sBJRRv7Kc/aft1K2SapDdU2rQ3IQrrCbZdKZY= Received: by 10.36.118.13 with SMTP id q13mr3240629nzc; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:46:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id c1sm3212012nzd.2005.12.26.06.46.07; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:46:09 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Eric Kjeldergaard Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:48:51 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512262218.30970.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512262332.18703.kjelderg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512262332.18703.kjelderg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512262248.52048.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:46:15 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 22:32, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 23:18, Yuan Jue wrote: > > I just found a software called gDesklets which I think is wonderful. > > you can find it in > > http://gdesklets.gnomedesktop.org/categories.php?func=gd_show_app&gd_app_ > >id =191 it is a WeeklyCalendar. almost fulfill my demand > > Ah, if you are after something like gdesklets, kde seems to have > SuperKaramba (ports deskutils/superkaramba) which embeds scripts into the > desktop in almost the same way. Not sure if you are still looking for > something different or if you are satisfied with what you have now, thanks for your suggestion. Refer to SuperKaramba, I don't find something lile WeeklyCalendar in gDesklets. maybe you can show me the plugin in SuperKaramba that do the same job -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 14:56:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BF016A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:56:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202D343D49 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:56:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1149860nzo for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:56:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=XA+rpJjONUi6qURfezQOQ6lQs6BlbItXs7UQtF/j2XouHKQwfki3/IfOwLt/ys/Gwns8tunLSq9NAv0ilfR9Z7UjQkuFYjLx3aKAmLI6FmWQbXvKP3MMFeNHrvpRKfqOGfhEpqTw8wxPRPkF0G/NUW6ORToTF6CZ/eAdJ2o77JY= Received: by 10.36.68.5 with SMTP id q5mr3338181nza; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:56:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.86? ( [221.186.3.89]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 40sm6012nzf.2005.12.26.06.56.50; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:56:52 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: Yuan Jue Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:56:38 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512262332.18703.kjelderg@gmail.com> <200512262248.52048.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512262248.52048.yuanjue02@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1323322.SWpJtE2JSG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512262356.46611.kjelderg@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:56:53 -0000 --nextPart1323322.SWpJtE2JSG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 26 December 2005 23:48, Yuan Jue wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 22:32, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > > On Monday 26 December 2005 23:18, Yuan Jue wrote: > > > I just found a software called gDesklets which I think is wonderful. > > > you can find it in > > > http://gdesklets.gnomedesktop.org/categories.php?func=3Dgd_show_app&g= d_ap > > >p_ id =3D191 it is a WeeklyCalendar. almost fulfill my demand > > > > Ah, if you are after something like gdesklets, kde seems to have > > SuperKaramba (ports deskutils/superkaramba) which embeds scripts into t= he > > desktop in almost the same way. Not sure if you are still looking for > > something different or if you are satisfied with what you have now, > > thanks for your suggestion. Refer to SuperKaramba, I don't find something > lile WeeklyCalendar in gDesklets. maybe you can show me the plugin in > SuperKaramba that do the same job http://kde-look.org/content/search.php is a good place to look for=20 superkaramba themes, as you probably know exactly what you are after better= =20 than I. A quick search makes it look like TooDooList=20 (http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=3D31699&PHPSESSID=3D1854da217= cc62d46f8f9832d7afc654e)=20 might be able to do what you are after. Eric =2D-=20 The signature is a location used to give a personalised feel to each E-mail= =20 without having to personalise each E-mail. --nextPart1323322.SWpJtE2JSG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDsASuSMnO3Fce5JgRAlXTAJ4+P5uR2YyAcOX13Oxztk+4UqJ1OgCgkSoM TrDCLtqL9qojYfFq4nfn0DA= =AtmE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1323322.SWpJtE2JSG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:06:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E13616A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:06:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC30D43D4C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:06:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 28897 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2005 15:06:13 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Dec 2005 15:06:12 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2AAA628423; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:06:12 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Micah References: <43ADD354.9090606@ywave.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Dec 2005 10:06:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43ADD354.9090606@ywave.com> Message-ID: <447j9r290c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 95 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freeBSD Subject: Re: pthread problems and ports on fresh 6.0 install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:06:14 -0000 Micah writes: > I wrote in a few days ago about gpgme not compiling. It had an error > about several pthread_* functions. I got around it by installing from > packages. Now I can't compile multimedia/gstreamer from ports for the > same reason. (Error below). I'm not sure what to do, or even what the > problem is... Any help in tracking the problem down is appreciated. > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE i386 with the generic kernel installed > off CD. > > Thanks, > Micah > > *** For GPGME error message see: *** > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-December/108171.html > > ***Error Message*** > cc -shared .libs/libgstspider_la-gstspider.o > .libs/libgstspider_la-gstspideridentity.o > .libs/libgstspider_la-gstsearchfuncs.o -Wl,--rpath > -Wl,/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer/work/gstreamer-0.8.11/gst/.libs > -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/local/lib > ../../gst/.libs/libgstreamer-0.8.so -march=athlon -Wl,-soname > -Wl,libgstspider.so -Wl,-retain-symbols-file > -Wl,.libs/libgstspider.exp -o .libs/libgstspider.so > creating libgstspider.la > (cd .libs && rm -f libgstspider.la && ln -s ../libgstspider.la > libgstspider.la) > if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/local/include > -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 > -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > -fno-common -g -Wall -DGST_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -I../../libs -I../.. -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -pipe -march=athlon -MT > spidertest-spidertest.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/spidertest-spidertest.Tpo" > -c > -o spidertest-spidertest.o `test -f 'spidertest.c' || echo > './'`spidertest.c; \ > then mv -f ".deps/spidertest-spidertest.Tpo" > ".deps/spidertest-spidertest.Po"; else rm -f > ".deps/spidertest-spidertest.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool15 --tag=CC --mode=link cc -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -pipe -march=athlon -L/usr/local/lib > -o > spidertest spidertest-spidertest.o ../../gst/libgstreamer-0.8.la > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -pipe -march=athlon -o > .libs/spidertest spidertest-spidertest.o -L/usr/local/lib > ../../gst/.libs/libgstreamer-0.8.so -lxml2 -lz -lgobject-2.0 > -lgthread-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -liconv -lpopt -lintl -lm > -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `pthread_attr_destroy' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to `pthread_create' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to `pthread_attr_init' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to `pthread_exit' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to `pthread_equal' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `pthread_getschedparam' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `pthread_attr_setscope' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `pthread_setschedparam' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `pthread_attr_setstacksize' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `pthread_attr_setschedparam' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `pthread_attr_setdetachstate' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to `pthread_join' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `pthread_cond_timedwait' > /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `pthread_attr_getschedparam' > gmake[4]: *** [spidertest] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer/work/gstreamer-0.8.11/gst/autoplug' > gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer/work/gstreamer-0.8.11/gst' > gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer/work/gstreamer-0.8.11/gst' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer/work/gstreamer-0.8.11' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer. > # > How did you install the ports? Are they up-to-date? Are there maybe some stale files in that particular port directory? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:08:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D8616A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:08:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qxmx.tlyz@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927E343D6E for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:08:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qxmx.tlyz@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1151757nzo for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:08:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from; b=Jsc2fjNzPLy7NDK56CgUGY2qoGP47LW63IWdqdGGONCD2jrPRgUKs0KxIeyfzDEL/onBYzpBfE4sgYWRXPvFWnaNel4ozte1+xjuKb7xmdHR8g1QizX7Guye8eD+cn7C/b2feTlkASA8PqWGWVO3xLvkM/OWqhliDmhDx8LP+RQ= Received: by 10.36.79.16 with SMTP id c16mr3347450nzb; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e1sm375207nzd.2005.12.26.07.08.22; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:08:24 -0800 (PST) Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:11:06 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512262248.52048.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512262356.46611.kjelderg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512262356.46611.kjelderg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512262311.06866.yuanjue02@gmail.com> From: Yuan Jue Cc: Eric Kjeldergaard Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:08:41 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 22:56, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 23:48, Yuan Jue wrote: > > On Monday 26 December 2005 22:32, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > > > On Monday 26 December 2005 23:18, Yuan Jue wrote: > > > > I just found a software called gDesklets which I think is wonderful. > > > > you can find it in > > > > http://gdesklets.gnomedesktop.org/categories.php?func=gd_show_app&gd_ > > > >ap p_ id =191 it is a WeeklyCalendar. almost fulfill my demand > > > > > > Ah, if you are after something like gdesklets, kde seems to have > > > SuperKaramba (ports deskutils/superkaramba) which embeds scripts into > > > the desktop in almost the same way. Not sure if you are still looking > > > for something different or if you are satisfied with what you have now, > > > > thanks for your suggestion. Refer to SuperKaramba, I don't find something > > lile WeeklyCalendar in gDesklets. maybe you can show me the plugin in > > SuperKaramba that do the same job > > http://kde-look.org/content/search.php is a good place to look for > superkaramba themes, as you probably know exactly what you are after better > than I. A quick search makes it look like TooDooList > (http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=31699&PHPSESSID=1854da217cc62 >d46f8f9832d7afc654e) might be able to do what you are after. I have checked it out. it is good-looking, but not that good as WeeklyCalendar in my opinion. maybe I can send you a snapshot of my screen to show you this :) anyway, thanks very much -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:09:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F50416A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:09:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim.greeningjackson@ntlworld.com) Received: from mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600BD43D8B for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:09:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim.greeningjackson@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20051226150907.UHWF21883.mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:09:07 +0000 Received: from tordella ([213.106.189.79]) by aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20051226150907.XFZZ774.aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@tordella> for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:09:07 +0000 From: "Tim Greening-Jackson" To: Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:09:15 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20051226130206.M64642@bmyster.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Thread-Index: AcYKHWHuDz9GIcC+TnuAbCejbelRxwAELyVA Message-Id: <20051226150907.XFZZ774.aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@tordella> Subject: RE: backups spanning tapes help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:09:21 -0000 I believe you should use the "M" flag. # tar cvfM /dev/foo . or some such. But that was a long time ago, on an operating system far away. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Brent > Sent: 26 December 2005 13:05 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: backups spanning tapes help > > We use a freebsd box that has a old 8mm library drive attached that we use > for > backups..my question is these tapes hold 7gigs native or 14 gig compressed > ..One i cant seem to get compression going so i was wondering how do you > span > tapes using tar ? Unless theres another way to do this > > thank you for your help & Merry Christmas > > -- > Brent Bailey CCNA > Bmyster LLC > > > --RIP Brother Dime-- > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:28:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5C016A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:28:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9724B43D5D for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:28:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 30622 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2005 15:28:25 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Dec 2005 15:28:25 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 95ADA28423; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:28:24 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Parv References: <20051225093338.GA2097@holestein.holy.cow> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Dec 2005 10:28:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051225093338.GA2097@holestein.holy.cow> Message-ID: <44zmmnzxlz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Usage/Context of PPP_(DEFLATE|BSDCOMP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:28:26 -0000 Parv writes: > I see that PPP_FILTER kernel option is mentioned in pppd(8) man > page. Could somebody tell me how & where PPP_DEFLATE & PPP_BSDCOMP > options are used, or where can i find information on them? They are compression capabilities that can be negotiated for use with the point-to-point protocol ("PPP"). If you need more information, and you can't work it out on your own from the source, you'll need to ask a more specific question. Other than protocol developers, I wouldn't expect anybody to need to know about that kind of option these days. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:37:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F0F16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:37:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0946443D5C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:37:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 25807 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 15:37:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=caBS+slh2FOK+ZAemDiFd0OgwJch5S/GlR9x6uoLlDTGL6n2wHzXx24tuT1Y8vh/nSZj57poUdofXPKzJv9Ckjc1H0ITvcdZpWqMT3lCiakb7JaDrJeuPDNnfouCyR2X00F4qafl/1kJkoWEL3O/ZvGwl9U5SC86U9o0aRB5vuM= ; Message-ID: <20051226153749.25805.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:37:49 PST Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:37:49 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Parv In-Reply-To: <44zmmnzxlz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Usage/Context of PPP_(DEFLATE|BSDCOMP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:37:51 -0000 --- Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Parv writes: > > > I see that PPP_FILTER kernel option is > mentioned in pppd(8) man > > page. Could somebody tell me how & where > PPP_DEFLATE & PPP_BSDCOMP > > options are used, or where can i find > information on them? > > They are compression capabilities that can be > negotiated for use with > the point-to-point protocol ("PPP"). If you > need more information, > and you can't work it out on your own from the > source, you'll need to > ask a more specific question. Other than > protocol developers, I > wouldn't expect anybody to need to know about > that kind of option > these days. I don't see the point of answering the guy if you're just going to tell him to take a flying leap; the answers are simple: PPP_DEFLATE: Needed to include the zlip deflate libs into the kernel, whether you're using PPP or not. PPP_BSDCOMP: This is a specific PPP option (BSD Compression), so you need to enable this only if you want it supported PPP_FILTER: Enables BPF ppp filtering. Its inefficient to pass every packet to the bpf filters when you have no intention of using them, so disabling this allows for a more efficient stream. Not too difficult. Danial __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:37:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB7B16A420 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:37:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A7F143D5D for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:37:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 25807 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 15:37:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=caBS+slh2FOK+ZAemDiFd0OgwJch5S/GlR9x6uoLlDTGL6n2wHzXx24tuT1Y8vh/nSZj57poUdofXPKzJv9Ckjc1H0ITvcdZpWqMT3lCiakb7JaDrJeuPDNnfouCyR2X00F4qafl/1kJkoWEL3O/ZvGwl9U5SC86U9o0aRB5vuM= ; Message-ID: <20051226153749.25805.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:37:49 PST Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:37:49 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Parv In-Reply-To: <44zmmnzxlz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Usage/Context of PPP_(DEFLATE|BSDCOMP) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:37:51 -0000 --- Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Parv writes: > > > I see that PPP_FILTER kernel option is > mentioned in pppd(8) man > > page. Could somebody tell me how & where > PPP_DEFLATE & PPP_BSDCOMP > > options are used, or where can i find > information on them? > > They are compression capabilities that can be > negotiated for use with > the point-to-point protocol ("PPP"). If you > need more information, > and you can't work it out on your own from the > source, you'll need to > ask a more specific question. Other than > protocol developers, I > wouldn't expect anybody to need to know about > that kind of option > these days. I don't see the point of answering the guy if you're just going to tell him to take a flying leap; the answers are simple: PPP_DEFLATE: Needed to include the zlip deflate libs into the kernel, whether you're using PPP or not. PPP_BSDCOMP: This is a specific PPP option (BSD Compression), so you need to enable this only if you want it supported PPP_FILTER: Enables BPF ppp filtering. Its inefficient to pass every packet to the bpf filters when you have no intention of using them, so disabling this allows for a more efficient stream. Not too difficult. Danial __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:38:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8080916A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:38:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mr_trutt@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay109-f30.bay109.hotmail.com [64.4.19.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FB643D62 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:38:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mr_trutt@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:38:26 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.19.200 by by109fd.bay109.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:38:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.191.2.83] X-Originating-Email: [mr_trutt@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mr_trutt@hotmail.com From: "G Trutt" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:38:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_7f6e_2442_6850" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Dec 2005 15:38:26.0575 (UTC) FILETIME=[69C441F0:01C60A32] Cc: Subject: Alpha 6.0 Install... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:38:27 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_7f6e_2442_6850 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Dear Sir or Madam, I am trying to install FreeBSD for Alpha, release 6.0. I have read the documentation, but nothing I've read gives me any hints about the issue I'm having with boot/install from CDROM. I have attached a copy of my console output, which should give a good look at the gory details. I would appreciate any pointers you could offer! I keep getting a cpu fault/panic and nothing I've come across gives me any direction or starting point? Please help. Gorden Trutt mr_trutt@hotmail.com ------=_NextPart_000_7f6e_2442_6850 Content-Type: text/plain; name="consoleOut.txt"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="consoleOut.txt" >>>show auto_action HALT boot_dev dka0.0.0.6.0 boot_file boot_osflags 0,0 boot_reset OFF bootdef_dev dka0.0.0.6.0 booted_dev booted_file booted_osflags bus_probe_algorithm old char_set 0 console serial control_disfd enable control_idema enable control_irq11 scsi control_irq12 mouse control_scsi_term internal controlp on dump_dev enable_audit ON ewa0_arp_tries 3 ewa0_bootp_file ewa0_bootp_server ewa0_bootp_tries 3 ewa0_def_ginetaddr 0.0.0.0 ewa0_def_inetaddr 0.0.0.0 ewa0_def_inetfile ewa0_def_sinetaddr 0.0.0.0 ewa0_def_subnetmask 0.0.0.0 ewa0_ginetaddr 0.0.0.0 ewa0_inet_init bootp ewa0_inetaddr 0.0.0.0 ewa0_inetfile ewa0_loop_count 3e8 ewa0_loop_inc a ewa0_loop_patt ffffffff ewa0_loop_size 2e ewa0_lp_msg_node 1 ewa0_mode BNC ewa0_protocols MOP ewa0_sinetaddr 0.0.0.0 ewa0_tftp_tries 3 ffauto OFF ffnext OFF kbd_hardware_type PCXAL language 36 language_name English(American) license MU mopv3_boot OFF os_type UNIX pal VMS PALcode V5.56-2, OSF PALcode X1.46-2 pci_parity off pka0_disconnect 1 pka0_fast 1 pka0_host_id 7 quick_start OFF scsi_poll ON srm2ctrl srm2dev sys_serial_num tga_sync_green 2 timer_tps 1 tt_allow_login 1 tty_dev 0 version V7.0-9 Mar 18 1999 13:41:11 >>> >>>show dev dka0.0.0.6.0 DKA0 RZ28M 0568 dka100.1.0.6.0 DKA100 RZ28M 0568 dka400.4.0.6.0 DKA400 RRD45 1645 dva0.0.0.0.1 DVA0 ewa0.0.0.11.0 EWA0 08-00-2B-E7-7F-DA pka0.7.0.6.0 PKA0 SCSI Bus ID 7 >>>boot dka400 (boot dka400.4.0.6.0 -flags 0,0) block 0 of dka400.4.0.6.0 is a valid boot block reading 406 blocks from dka400.4.0.6.0 bootstrap code read in base = 1f2000, image_start = 0, image_bytes = 32c00 initializing HWRPB at 2000 initializing page table at 1e4000 initializing machine state setting affinity to the primary CPU jumping to bootstrap code Consoles: SRM firmware console VMS PAL rev: 0x1000000010538 OSF PAL rev: 0x100000002012e Switch to OSF PAL code succeeded. FreeBSD/alpha SRM CD9660 boot, Revision 1.2 (root@ds10.freebie.xs4all.nl, Wed Nov 2 16:27:21 UTC 2005) Memory: 131072 k Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf /boot/kernel/kernel data=0x619410+0x39820 syms=[0x8+0x6c060+0x8+0x59b68] | Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]... Entering /boot/kernel/kernel at 0xfffffc000034a9d0... Unrecognized boot flag '0'. Unrecognized boot flag ','. Unrecognized boot flag '0'. Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 01:10:43 UTC 2005 root@ds10.freebie.xs4all.nl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC AlphaStation 200/400 ("Avanti") AlphaStation 200 4/233, 233MHz 8192 byte page size, 1 processor. CPU: EV45 (21064A) major=6 minor=0 OSF PAL rev: 0x100000002012e real memory = 132169728 (126 MB) avail memory = 115351552 (110 MB) apecs0: pcib0: <2107x PCI host bus adapter> on apecs0 pci0: on pcib0 sym0: <810> port 0x10000-0x100ff mem 0x82000000-0x820000ff irq 11 at device 6.0 on pci0 sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-10, SE, parity checking sym0: interrupting at ISA irq 11 sym0: [GIANT-LOCKED] isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 de0: port 0x10100-0x1017f mem 0x82000100-0x8200017f irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0 de0: DEC 21040 [10Mb/s] pass 2.3 de0: Ethernet address: 08:00:2b:e7:7f:da de0: interrupting at ISA irq 5 ata0 at port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 irq 14 on isa0 ata0: interrupting at ISA irq 14 ata1 at port 0x170-0x177,0x376 irq 15 on isa0 ata1: interrupting at ISA irq 15 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 atkbd0: interrupting at ISA irq 1 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: interrupting at ISA irq 6 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 mcclock0: at port 0x70-0x71 on isa0 ppc0: at port 0x3bc-0x3c3 irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Polled port ppi0: on ppbus0 ppc0: interrupting at ISA irq 7 sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A, console sio0: interrupting at ISA irq 4 sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x80 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A sio1: interrupting at ISA irq 3 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Timecounter "alpha" frequency 233340819 Hz quality 800 Timecountmd0: Preers tick every 0.976 msec Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle loaded image 4423680 bytes at 0xfffffc0000a18808 da1 at sym0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 2007MB (4110480 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 255C) da0 at sym0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 2007MB (4110480 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 255C) cd0 at sym0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 4.237MB/s transfers (4.237MHz, offset 8) cd0: cd present [1042004 x 512 byte records] fatal kernel trap: trap entry = 0x4 (unaligned access fault) cpuid = 0 faulting va = 0xfffffc00010611c2 opcode = 0x28 register = 0x1 pc = 0xfffffc00004c77dc ra = 0xfffffc00004c7a28 sp = 0xfffffe0007351bb0 curthread = 0xfffffc0007cff500 pid = 2, comm = g_event panic: trap cpuid = 0 Uptime: 11s Cannot dump. No dump device defined. Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort --> Press a key on the console to reboot, --> or switch off the system now. Rebooting... ------=_NextPart_000_7f6e_2442_6850-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:48:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3E816A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:48:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1A5843D5E for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 90596 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 15:48:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mEfje5cQGBlibKqjal2pHhDiNoIOFjxS5j4al/nobYRq54xz4co1QGxyVhiPp5ATHHiW71EHZ/iIj0TGw9r2pmFQ4z+ZkbwkFfjf0T1TUwy0M/aFu4lvpQBZtzNIpwutEdc9tpEdoBWhO5D2W/tN/GjH5ZMAkS2cLdq4aUFPYDg= ; Message-ID: <20051226154813.90594.qmail@web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:48:13 PST Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:48:13 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , "Loren M. Lang" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Yance Kowara , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:48:16 -0000 --- Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Danial Thom > [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] > >Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 3:47 PM > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang > >Cc: Yance Kowara; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL > connections > > > > > >Ted the incompetent, wrong on all counts once > >again: > > > > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt > >wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: Danial Thom > >> [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] > >> >Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM > >> >To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt > >> >Cc: Yance Kowara; > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL > >> connections > >> > > >> > > >> >All upstream ISPs are > >> >connected to everyone on the internet, so > it > >> >doesn't matter which you send your packets > to > >> >(the entire point of a "connectionless" > >> network. > >> >They both can forward your traffic to > wherever > >> >its going. > >> > >> They aren't going to forward your traffic > >> unless > >> it's sourced by an IP number they assign. > To > >> do otherwise means they would permit you to > >> spoof IP > >> numbers. And while it's possible some very > >> small > >> ISP's run by idiots that don't know any > better > >> might > >> still permit this, their feeds certainly > will > >> not. > > > >Yes they will. > > I assure you they will not. > > >Routers route based on dest > >address only. Are you somehow suggesting that > an > >ISP can't be dual homed and use only one link > if > >one goes down, since some of the addresses > sent > >up the remaining pipe wouldn't have source > >addresses assigned by that upstream provider? > > ISP's that are dual-homed have to register > their > subnets with both providers. > > For example, suppose I'm a small ISP and I go > get a > Sprint connection and get assigned a range of > 11 IP subnets, 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 > > These are Sprint-owned IP addresses of course. > As > I source traffic from 192.168.1.x, Sprint > recognizes > it as valid traffic and allows it to pass > Sprint's > ingress filter to me. > > Now I get a bit bigger and decide I need a > redundant > connection. So I contact ARIN and buy an AS > number, > then contact ATT and get a connection to them, > then > setup BGP between myself and ATT & Sprint. > > When ATT and I are setting up BGP, ATT's techs > will > ask me what subnets I'm advertising, I tell > them > 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 ATT then checks > with > ARIN's whois server to make sure Sprint has > entered > a record for that list of subnets that says I'm > authorized to use them. If all that checks out > OK > then ATT adjusts their ingress filters so I can > source traffic to them from those subnets. So if you have 2 ISPs, then both of them know about both of your address groups, so you can load balance any way you want, right? Which is why the scenario I've suggested will work in all cases. I also know tons of secondary peering ISPs that don't do any filtering at all on incoming traffic. If you're peering with multiple networks the combinations of source addresses that are possible to go through your network are too mind-boggling to load your server with. Most T3 routers deployed can barely handle their loads without filtering every incoming packet through ingress filters. You may think they do it, but most don't For example, in my office I have a cable modem and a 100Mb/s link to an ISP that happens to be in my building. I can set my default router to either router and it works fine. The cable modem company will accept ANY source address and so will the ISP. I assure you that the cable company doesn't know of my other addresses. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:50:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE19916A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:50:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D65B743D49 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 70416 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 15:50:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gv4iqlCpvjyapaHuN9okwhO5T2u4KygfQiwMSoKM5m2SywnaVwt+QFGb8SO2Adn2pJAPgIN3p/FNdgxGUnPz4+oR2m32K9aUmgMvhMlyF4aFMw0knD1UJeww4wxbyn34KSxTdlOnwifJuImif93Fri5fCToSK7OeQtitD4wb+Ok= ; Message-ID: <20051226155022.70414.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:50:22 PST Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:50:22 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , "Winelfred G. Pasamba" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: pretenda@wrgn.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:50:24 -0000 --- Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Danial Thom > [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] > >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:59 AM > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba > >Cc: pretenda@wrgn.net; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL > connections > > > > > > > > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt > >wrote: > > > >> > >> > >http://www.edimax.com/html/english/products/PRI582.htm > >> > >> "...Performs Outbound load balancing by > >> session, weight round robin or > >> traffic..." > >> > >> Note that they say by SESSION not by PACKET. > >> > >> It's marketingspeak. They are simply using > the > >> term load balancing > >> for a device that doesen't actually load > >> balance. Apparently > >> they figure that if they say "session load > >> balancing" even though > >> there is no such accepted definition, that > then > >> they are somehow not > >> lying. > >> > >> It's akin to someone saying that "FreeBSD is > a > >> kind of Linux" in a > >> sentence that uses Linux to indicate "open > >> source operating systems" > >> > >> Apparently you never heard the old saying > "A > >> grain of truth is > >> buried in all great lies" > > > >I'm not sure what your primary language is, > but > >"round robin" IS packet balancing. > > > > In an engineers treatise, perhaps. > > but this is a marketing document and your just > assuming > that they mean "per packet" they could have > easily meant > that the sessions were round-robined. > > >Suppose you have 2 "pipes": > > > >Round Robin: > > > >1 packet to pipe1 > >1 packet to pipe2 > >1 packet to pipe1 > >1 packet to pipe2 > > > >Weighted round Robin, weighted 2 to 1: > > > >1 packet to pipe1 > >1 packet to pipe1 > >1 packet to pipe2 > >1 packet to pipe1 > >1 packet to pipe1 > >1 packet to pipe2 > > > >"Per session" balancing may be useful when you > >have paths that are not very "equal". If you > load > >balance to different ISPs packets could arrive > >out of order (in fact they are likely to). > > You cannot load balance to 2 different ISPs > unless > your running BGP I already went over this. > > Does this product speak BGP? > > Ted I've seen your resume, Ted how do you get jobs? Are people hiring so incompetent? As stated, even by Ted, you have to register ALL of your addresses with ALL of your ISPs, so you can send your packets to ANYONE you want, even if they are filtering. Please stop listening to Ted. He doesnt understand this. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 15:58:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F7116A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:58:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8290543D5E for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:57:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 16445 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 15:57:59 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=s0TyUPn16xi7Ge4TBnwcatT+Z7fVdCelqnsrf8yPgVIHXeWgUdh3CUWHcdHMQVU7UG1JbNo4WdsIZL2QxxZIDzcrqdgFy4cKTvaO0V2j0Ny/8B9zmVGHYT0XihkYVLwf5YnA1ER1Cw13rtvi3Dho6+WAjutctRykwSe1nc6g1u4= ; Message-ID: <20051226155759.16443.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:57:59 PST Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:57:59 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , "Loren M. Lang" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Yance Kowara , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:58:00 -0000 --- Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Danial Thom > [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] > >Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 3:47 PM > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang > >Cc: Yance Kowara; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL > connections > > > > > >Ted the incompetent, wrong on all counts once > >again: > > > > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt > >wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: Danial Thom > >> [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] > >> >Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM > >> >To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt > >> >Cc: Yance Kowara; > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL > >> connections > >> > > >> > > >> >All upstream ISPs are > >> >connected to everyone on the internet, so > it > >> >doesn't matter which you send your packets > to > >> >(the entire point of a "connectionless" > >> network. > >> >They both can forward your traffic to > wherever > >> >its going. > >> > >> They aren't going to forward your traffic > >> unless > >> it's sourced by an IP number they assign. > To > >> do otherwise means they would permit you to > >> spoof IP > >> numbers. And while it's possible some very > >> small > >> ISP's run by idiots that don't know any > better > >> might > >> still permit this, their feeds certainly > will > >> not. > > > >Yes they will. > > I assure you they will not. > > >Routers route based on dest > >address only. Are you somehow suggesting that > an > >ISP can't be dual homed and use only one link > if > >one goes down, since some of the addresses > sent > >up the remaining pipe wouldn't have source > >addresses assigned by that upstream provider? > > ISP's that are dual-homed have to register > their > subnets with both providers. > > For example, suppose I'm a small ISP and I go > get a > Sprint connection and get assigned a range of > 11 IP subnets, 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 > > These are Sprint-owned IP addresses of course. > As > I source traffic from 192.168.1.x, Sprint > recognizes > it as valid traffic and allows it to pass > Sprint's > ingress filter to me. > > Now I get a bit bigger and decide I need a > redundant > connection. So I contact ARIN and buy an AS > number, > then contact ATT and get a connection to them, > then > setup BGP between myself and ATT & Sprint. > > When ATT and I are setting up BGP, ATT's techs > will > ask me what subnets I'm advertising, I tell > them > 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 ATT then checks > with > ARIN's whois server to make sure Sprint has > entered > a record for that list of subnets that says I'm > authorized to use them. If all that checks out > OK > then ATT adjusts their ingress filters so I can > source traffic to them from those subnets. > > Now I get even bigger and need more IP's than > what > Sprint will provide, so I go to ARIN and buy > them. > Then all my feeds have to adjust their ingress > filters > to the new subnet. > > Now I get even more bigger and I start trying > to setup > peering relationships with other networks, so I > don't have to pay them directly. Well now > guess what, > those networks are now monitoring the traffic > volume > I'm sending them, because they don't want me to > use > and abuse them and give them little peering in > return. > So I now have an enormous financial incentive > to make > sure that any traffic coming from any of my end > users > is in fact valid traffic, so you better believe > I'm > going to enforce that with ingress filters to > my > downstream customers. > > Anyway, this is all academic because the > wrongly-sourced > packet won't even get into my network to be > forwarded > and blocked by ATT or Sprint, or my peer > routers, in the > first place. Why? Because every > wrongly-sourced packet > I allow a customer to send to me, can > potentially displace > a correct packet from a customer, making their > traffic slower > and setting up potential for complaints. > > The ONLY Internet routers that don't igress > filter today are > transit routers run by transit ASs, and no > network that > is worth anything allows direct connections to > those > routers to their end-user customers. There is > just too much > potential for abuse, and even more potential > for being > blackholed as a rogue network by the rest of > the Internet. > > Everybody today that knows anything > about what they are doing, applies ingress > filters, or > they require their downstreams to ingress > filter. In fact I'd > say this is one of the reasons Cisco was > disloged > as the core router vendor by Juniper, because > of the need > for enough CPU in routers closer and closer to > the core > to be able to run access lists. > > Chances today that a cable line or a DSL line > going to an > end user could get a packet with a non-network > source > very far in to the Internet are zilch. > > One of the largest sources of bogus source IP > numbers in > fact are those cheap-as-shit DSL/Cable routers, > as some > of those models will ARP both their legal WAN > IP address, > and the LAN IP addresses, on their WAN port. > All of the > ActionTec routers do this in bridged mode, for > example, > and Qwest has thousands of them deployed. And > the second > largest source are infected PC's > that have DDoS trojans on them, which some > mothership You're not using illegal addresses when you load balance, Ted. You're using real address that all of your upstream ISPs need to know about. Why can't you grasp this concept? DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 16:03:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDC316A420 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:03:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lowell@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212B343D62 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:03:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lowell@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 17188 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2005 16:03:09 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Dec 2005 16:03:09 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9EBA028423; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:03:08 -0500 (EST) To: "G Trutt" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Dec 2005 11:03:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44mzinzw03.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 228 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alpha 6.0 Install... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:03:24 -0000 This message got caught in my spam trap, for reasons that probably affect other people too, so I hope the question doesn't fall completely between the cracks. "G Trutt" writes: > I am trying to install FreeBSD for Alpha, release 6.0. I have read the > documentation, but nothing I've read gives me any hints about the issue I'm > having with boot/install from CDROM. I have attached a copy of my console > output, which should give a good look at the gory details. I would > appreciate any pointers you could offer! I keep getting a cpu fault/panic > and nothing I've come across gives me any direction or starting point? > > Please help. > > > Gorden Trutt > mr_trutt@hotmail.com > >>>show > auto_action HALT > boot_dev dka0.0.0.6.0 > boot_file > boot_osflags 0,0 > boot_reset OFF > bootdef_dev dka0.0.0.6.0 > booted_dev > booted_file > booted_osflags > bus_probe_algorithm old > char_set 0 > console serial > control_disfd enable > control_idema enable > control_irq11 scsi > control_irq12 mouse > control_scsi_term internal > controlp on > dump_dev > enable_audit ON > ewa0_arp_tries 3 > ewa0_bootp_file > ewa0_bootp_server > ewa0_bootp_tries 3 > ewa0_def_ginetaddr 0.0.0.0 > ewa0_def_inetaddr 0.0.0.0 > ewa0_def_inetfile > ewa0_def_sinetaddr 0.0.0.0 > ewa0_def_subnetmask 0.0.0.0 > ewa0_ginetaddr 0.0.0.0 > ewa0_inet_init bootp > ewa0_inetaddr 0.0.0.0 > ewa0_inetfile > ewa0_loop_count 3e8 > ewa0_loop_inc a > ewa0_loop_patt ffffffff > ewa0_loop_size 2e > ewa0_lp_msg_node 1 > ewa0_mode BNC > ewa0_protocols MOP > ewa0_sinetaddr 0.0.0.0 > ewa0_tftp_tries 3 > ffauto OFF > ffnext OFF > kbd_hardware_type PCXAL > language 36 > language_name English(American) > license MU > mopv3_boot OFF > os_type UNIX > pal VMS PALcode V5.56-2, OSF PALcode X1.46-2 > pci_parity off > pka0_disconnect 1 > pka0_fast 1 > pka0_host_id 7 > quick_start OFF > scsi_poll ON > srm2ctrl > srm2dev > sys_serial_num > tga_sync_green 2 > timer_tps 1 > tt_allow_login 1 > tty_dev 0 > version V7.0-9 Mar 18 1999 13:41:11 > >>> > > >>>show dev > dka0.0.0.6.0 DKA0 RZ28M 0568 > dka100.1.0.6.0 DKA100 RZ28M 0568 > dka400.4.0.6.0 DKA400 RRD45 1645 > dva0.0.0.0.1 DVA0 > ewa0.0.0.11.0 EWA0 08-00-2B-E7-7F-DA > pka0.7.0.6.0 PKA0 SCSI Bus ID 7 > > >>>boot dka400 > (boot dka400.4.0.6.0 -flags 0,0) > block 0 of dka400.4.0.6.0 is a valid boot block > reading 406 blocks from dka400.4.0.6.0 > bootstrap code read in > base = 1f2000, image_start = 0, image_bytes = 32c00 > initializing HWRPB at 2000 > initializing page table at 1e4000 > initializing machine state > setting affinity to the primary CPU > jumping to bootstrap code > Consoles: SRM firmware console > VMS PAL rev: 0x1000000010538 > OSF PAL rev: 0x100000002012e > Switch to OSF PAL code succeeded. > > FreeBSD/alpha SRM CD9660 boot, Revision 1.2 > (root@ds10.freebie.xs4all.nl, Wed Nov 2 16:27:21 UTC 2005) > Memory: 131072 k > Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf > /boot/kernel/kernel data=0x619410+0x39820 syms=[0x8+0x6c060+0x8+0x59b68] > | > Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. > Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]... > Entering /boot/kernel/kernel at 0xfffffc000034a9d0... > Unrecognized boot flag '0'. > Unrecognized boot flag ','. > Unrecognized boot flag '0'. > Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 01:10:43 UTC 2005 > root@ds10.freebie.xs4all.nl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > AlphaStation 200/400 ("Avanti") > AlphaStation 200 4/233, 233MHz > 8192 byte page size, 1 processor. > CPU: EV45 (21064A) major=6 minor=0 > OSF PAL rev: 0x100000002012e > real memory = 132169728 (126 MB) > avail memory = 115351552 (110 MB) > apecs0: > pcib0: <2107x PCI host bus adapter> on apecs0 > pci0: on pcib0 > sym0: <810> port 0x10000-0x100ff mem 0x82000000-0x820000ff irq 11 at device > 6.0 > on pci0 > sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-10, SE, parity checking > sym0: interrupting at ISA irq 11 > sym0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > de0: port 0x10100-0x1017f mem 0x82000100-0x8200017f > irq > 5 at device 11.0 on pci0 > de0: DEC 21040 [10Mb/s] pass 2.3 > de0: Ethernet address: 08:00:2b:e7:7f:da > de0: interrupting at ISA irq 5 > ata0 at port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 irq 14 on isa0 > ata0: interrupting at ISA irq 14 > ata1 at port 0x170-0x177,0x376 irq 15 on isa0 > ata1: interrupting at ISA irq 15 > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > atkbd0: interrupting at ISA irq 1 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on > isa0 > fdc0: interrupting at ISA irq 6 > fdc0: [FAST] > fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > mcclock0: at port 0x70-0x71 on isa0 > ppc0: at port 0x3bc-0x3c3 irq 7 on isa0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: on ppc0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Polled port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > ppc0: interrupting at ISA irq 7 > sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > sio0: type 16550A, console > sio0: interrupting at ISA irq 4 > sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x80 on isa0 > sio1: type 16550A > sio1: interrupting at ISA irq 3 > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > Timecounter "alpha" frequency 233340819 Hz quality 800 > Timecountmd0: Preers tick every 0.976 msec > Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle > loaded image 4423680 bytes at 0xfffffc0000a18808 > da1 at sym0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8), Tagged Queueing Enabled > da1: 2007MB (4110480 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 255C) > da0 at sym0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8), Tagged Queueing Enabled > da0: 2007MB (4110480 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 255C) > cd0 at sym0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device > cd0: 4.237MB/s transfers (4.237MHz, offset 8) > cd0: cd present [1042004 x 512 byte records] > > fatal kernel trap: > > trap entry = 0x4 (unaligned access fault) > cpuid = 0 > faulting va = 0xfffffc00010611c2 > opcode = 0x28 > register = 0x1 > pc = 0xfffffc00004c77dc > ra = 0xfffffc00004c7a28 > sp = 0xfffffe0007351bb0 > curthread = 0xfffffc0007cff500 > pid = 2, comm = g_event > > panic: trap > cpuid = 0 > Uptime: 11s > Cannot dump. No dump device defined. > Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort > --> Press a key on the console to reboot, > --> or switch off the system now. > Rebooting... Alpha is no longer a "tier-one" platform for FreeBSD, but looking for experts on it is likely to be your best option; everything looks okay as far as I can see, up to the point where the unaligned access occurs. If I recall correctly (I haven't dealt with an Alpha chip in a while, and there *were* differences from one to another), the alignment requirements are strictly word-based... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 16:13:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C30016A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:13:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A682343D45 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:13:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530b-0050.otenet.gr [62.103.226.50]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id jBQGDYub004769; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:13:34 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5908D1171C; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:12:22 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:12:22 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Yuan Jue Message-ID: <20051226161222.GA1038@flame.pc> References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512252205.33644.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AEB79D.9030200@locolomo.org> <200512261107.45871.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512261107.45871.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:13:39 -0000 On 2005-12-26 11:07, Yuan Jue wrote: > instead, I figure out another way to work around. > > 1.ifconfig bge0 delete > % this would shut my local NIC down totally > > 2.kldload if_ath > dhclient ath0 > > then I can enjoy the wireless internet surfing :) > > antway, thank you again! FWIW, On my laptop, which has to switch between a couple of wireless networks and my local LAN at home, I use custom shell scripts called ``/root/net/*.sh'' to encapsulate the changes I'd have to manually make. I have prepared working sets of files, like: /etc/resolv.conf_home /etc/resolv.conf_work and then run /root/net/home.sh which contains: #!/bin/sh if test -n "$1" && test -f "/root/netstart-home-$1.sh" ; then mode="$1" else mode=wlan fi echo "## Stopping local services" /etc/rc.d/named stop /etc/rc.d/sendmail stop echo "## Setting up /etc and /usr/local/etc files" ( cd /etc; cp resolv.conf_home resolv.conf; cp dhclient.conf_home dhclient.conf; cp namedb/named.conf_home namedb/named.conf; cd /usr/local/etc/postfix; cp main.cf_home main.cf; ) echo "## Bringing up the network connection" "/root/net/netstart-home-${mode}.sh" echo "## Refreshing the firewall rules" /etc/rc.d/pf reload echo "## Starting local services again" /etc/rc.d/named start /etc/rc.d/sendmail start The real work is done by netstart-home-wlan.sh or netstart-home-wlan.sh. The wlan script is the one that sets up a wireless connection, and contains: #!/bin/sh # Default setup for my bge0 interface. export ifconfig_ath0="DHCP ssid 'gker' \ wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey '1:0xXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX'" export defaultrouter="192.168.1.2" /etc/rc.d/netif stop bge0 /etc/rc.d/netif stop ath0 echo -n "Waiting for ath0 to associate " _timeout=0 _associated=NO while [ "$_timeout" -lt 30 ]; do status=$( ifconfig ath0 2>&1 | grep status: |\ awk '{print $2}' ) if [ X"${status}" = X"associated" ]; then _associated=YES break fi echo -n '.' sleep 1 _timeout=$(( $_timeout + 1 )) done if [ X"${_associated}" = X"YES" ]; then echo " ok" else echo '' echo "Failed to bring up ath0. Aborting." /etc/rc.d/netif stop ath0 exit 1 fi # # The default route may be pointing to another interface. Find out # the IP address of the default gateway, delete it and point to the # default gateway of my home network. # if [ -n "${defaultrouter}" ]; then _oldrouter=`netstat -rn | grep default | awk '{print $2}'` if [ -n "${_oldrouter}" ]; then route delete default "${_oldrouter}" unset _oldrouter fi route add default "$defaultrouter" fi This seems to work remarkably well so far. All I need to do once the laptop boots is to log in as root and run the proper /root/net/*.sh script :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 16:24:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A656616A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:24:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2A8343D5C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:24:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 40040 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 16:24:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xQSvsn+9tIA8uDGJYSXEsGOfS7d4YFw5MyA10kDQsJc9vMJMPN7vouQ/FAdGB3e6PhneTC+d3RVI2b5168c3CFUyESf2nAS3aUMhjxOF+hIEc5kLqHJUgaFfNwtmnMnbBzicNxVjigeV7dQejpmrBwy937bDlx2rl5tmrljMlk8= ; Message-ID: <20051226162456.40038.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:24:56 PST Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:24:56 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20051225221653.GA28062@lothlorien.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:24:57 -0000 --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 24 Dec Kent Stewart wrote: > > > There is also the problem that some sites are > designed to work with > > Internet Explorer. You can try to visit with > firefox but that doesn't > > always work even with firefox on XP. > > NO site should be designed to work with > IExplorer. I know it's done, but > it should not! Why do we have W3C? If we could > all just do things "by > the book" the internet would be a much nicer > place to visit. > > People who design for IExplorer are bad! They > have microsoft in mind and > _not_ the visitors. I hate it when choice gets > violated! It should be > called a crime against freedom. No, you're wrong here. You're letting your religious philosophy cloud your business sense. You develop to service the highest percentage of your expected viewer base. The truth is that the vast majority of visitors to most web sites are going to be using IE. While using unnecessary features as a primary component of your site that ONLY work with IE is foolish, you can't compromise your design just so that it will work with the 3% of religious fanatics that refuse to install IE on thier machines. Business is about numbers, and the numbers say that your site HAS to work with IE, and its nice if it works with others. I generally test with IE, Firefox and Netscape and I don't care much about much else. I have a friend in the travel biz who gets an unusual amount of traffic from AOL, because most of his customers are not computer people. His site needs to be well tested on AOL, where I couldn't really give a rat's behind if my commercial site works with AOL or not. You have to make sure your site works with the greatest majority of browsers available that will be accessing any given site. Its unfortunate that MS does what they want rather than following the standards, but in reality the standards should follow MS, because its really the only way to make everything work. Much of Microsoft's "extra" stuff is pretty useful and arguably better; its time the unix geeks get over it and stop whining about the big bad bully for the good of the big picture. MS isn't going away anytime soon. The truth is that anything MS does is a de-facto standard, whether you like it or not. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 16:48:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00E016A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:48:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4DB43D64 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:48:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 23016 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2005 16:48:25 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Dec 2005 16:48:25 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7266028423; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:48:24 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Dimitris Tsamis References: <43AE846A.8070203@mail.ntua.gr> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 26 Dec 2005 11:48:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43AE846A.8070203@mail.ntua.gr> Message-ID: <44hd8vztwn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mozilla extensions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:48:26 -0000 Dimitris Tsamis writes: > I use Firefox and Thunderbird on FreeBSD and I have noticed that some of > the extensions are available as ports, for example the adblock and > enigmail extensions. I want to ask if there is a difference between > installing the port and installing the extension from an xpi file. > Especially for Thunderbird I see that the version available for FreeBSD > on the official enigmail site is 0.89.6, whereas the port installs > version 0.93.0. Why is that? The official site is offering pre-compiled versions, and is somewhat out of date for FreeBSD. The maintainer of the mail/enigmail port (ale@) does a pretty good job of keeping the FreeBSD ports tree up to date with the released sources (often trailing a few weeks for minor releases, less for major ones). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 16:54:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EC816A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:54:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com (out5.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1441643D55 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:54:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC16D2A213 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:54:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:54:18 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 8v+F+HDwEVCA4Hlp38QapFcDf1IYcnmq+05RvO5fpgm+ 1135616058 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-192-109.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.192.109]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E22057146E for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:54:18 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:54:16 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051225154851.5b68d9a2.johan.spee@wanadoo.nl> In-Reply-To: <20051225154851.5b68d9a2.johan.spee@wanadoo.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512261654.17660.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD + Wine + Office 2K X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:54:20 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 14:48, Johan Spee wrote: > Is it actually possible to run office 2000 on FreeBSD? If so, I would > appreciate some tips or hints. I understand some people have got it to work using *just* FreeBSD. There is a documented way of doing it where you install Office under wine on Linux, and then transfer the installation to FreeBSD. Try finding it with Google. There is also the option of running a real Windows under qemu. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 17:00:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C6516A436 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:00:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A20AE43D8C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 36074 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 16:59:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sPDMeM3ndG6IHZU+hwy/4Mx/WGc70/Impkdpj/93sXJ3pSJ4Wgx3bPVhTp2qDMLz3h0MiVMASoZ8xUW1NYS5U47yKku97kswIGw88L5Gi+oTUl/UZWTbu5u9D+a9IPGO5XrdPyQm+C9s1awVarmK+w7TkVuqvm38ufshfUQlNmQ= ; Message-ID: <20051226165953.36072.qmail@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:59:53 PST Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:59:53 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , "Michael C. Shultz" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Daniel A." , Andy Sjostrom Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:00:19 -0000 --- Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On > Behalf Of Danial Thom > >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:34 AM > >To: Michael C. Shultz; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Cc: Daniel A.; Andy Sjostrom > >Subject: Re: BSD Question's. > > > > > > > > > >--- "Michael C. Shultz" > >wrote: > > > >> On Saturday 24 December 2005 06:54, Daniel > A. > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Andy, > >> > > >> > I am sorry for the trouble you have had > with > >> Windows XP. > >> > > >> > I suggest that you use Linux, as FreeBSD > >> really is not targeted at > >> > people who want to use graphical user > >> interfaces. > >> > >> In a few key areas FreeBSD is a better > desktop > >> OS than Linux: Easier to keep > >> the kernel/world and installed ports up to > date > >> for example without having > >> to resort to the microsoft/Linux fixall > method > >> of removing and reinstalling > >> everything every now and again. Your > opinion > >> is correct IMO that FreeBSD > >> managers put most emphasis on FreeBSD as a > >> server and little as a desktop. > >> My guess is because donations(cash) and > >> hardware support for developers > >> come from people who want servers while > people > >> who want a desktop OS tend to > >> donate squat.... > >> > >> > The linux developers really have been > trying > >> to make a valuable > >> > replacement for Windows, as they somehow > have > >> experienced the same > >> > issues with Windows (And Microsoft > products > >> in general) that you have. > >> > > >> > One Linux distribution in particular that > I > >> think you might like, is > >> > Ubuntu. You can download it at > >> http://www.ubuntulinux.org/, or order a > >> > CD (Free shipping, free CD, you pay > nothing). > >> > >> Advertising Linux in a FreeBSD mailing list? > > >> Sounds like you may have more of > >> axe to grind against the FreeBSD management > >> folk than a desire to offer sound > >> advice.... > >> > >> -Mike > > > >Why not just tell the truth, which is that > >Windows XP is the best that you can do for the > >desktop, and that there is no perfect solution > >that works perfectly in every scenario? > > This ignores a very important fact: the needs > of > a home user for a desktop OS are rapidly > becoming > very different than the needs of a corporation > for > a desktop OS. > > Windows XP is the best desktop OS you can have > on > the $499.99 computers that they sell with the > operating > system preloaded down at Best Buy, and that are > purchased > by the typical home user. > > But it is a serious problem for the average > corporation. > Many of them are deploying Microsoft Terminal > Server > and using Winterms, or Linux systems running > remote > desktop, terminal served into the TS. > > In this manner they can provide the user with > access to the apps that they are trained on, > such > as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, etc. in a > controlled > fashion that does not permit the user to > download > the latest virus-of-the-month, or crap-up their > system with the latest screen-saver from the > Weather channel that tanks the Internet > connection > every 3 minutes downloading a 1MB jpg file of > the > weather in San Francisco. This thinking is more about the lack of innovation of consultants and network staff than necessity. There are simple filters and bandwidth management that can manage networks at the egress without having to adulterate your network with a lot of crap like this. What you do on the intranet and how you interact outside of your local network are mutually exclusive components. With laptops being so prevalent now; the ability to allow users to pop a standard machine onto a corporate network is absolutely ESSENTIAL for maximum productivity. The ability to transparently protect your users without having to deploy "different" equipment than standard XP-type desktops is what separates the men from the boys. Something important to understand is that what "corporations" do is a function of the talent that they have making recommendations. Its not necessarily the "right" thing; in fact is almost never is. What's ironic is that "corporations" hire cheaper consultants who end up making them spend much more in the long run because of their lack of innovation. DT __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 17:11:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65B516A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:11:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com (out5.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C4B43D76 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:11:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6F1D2A37A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:10:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:10:58 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: xWPV2egNS9ecW77aH5Tbrgtr0o5kMP0sG/yhtCY8lG/c 1135617058 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-192-109.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.192.109]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DB857146A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:10:57 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:10:56 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <43AF084B.3070900@sbcglobal.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512261710.57423.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Uninstall Apache??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:11:00 -0000 On Sunday 25 December 2005 20:59, Jose Borquez wrote: > I would like to know how you can uninstall Apache is it was installed > from source? I did a search on Google and read that you could just stop > the service and then delete the apache source tree. Is this true? It's depends what exactly you mean by "from source", if you mean you installed from source using the port system, then you can treat it as if you installed from a package. OTOH if you installed directly from source, without using the port, you will have to look at the Apache documentation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 17:43:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDE916A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:43:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DAC643D4C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:43:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 6041 invoked by uid 502); 26 Dec 2005 17:43:07 -0000 Received: from dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.97.72) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Dec 2005 17:43:07 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.97.72 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com Message-ID: <43B02BAA.5050109@ywave.com> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:43:06 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <43ADD354.9090606@ywave.com> <447j9r290c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <447j9r290c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freeBSD Subject: Re: pthread problems and ports on fresh 6.0 install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:43:09 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Micah writes: > > >>I wrote in a few days ago about gpgme not compiling. It had an error >>about several pthread_* functions. I got around it by installing from >>packages. Now I can't compile multimedia/gstreamer from ports for the >>same reason. (Error below). I'm not sure what to do, or even what the >>problem is... Any help in tracking the problem down is appreciated. >> >>I'm running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE i386 with the generic kernel installed >>off CD. >> >>Thanks, >>Micah >> > > > How did you install the ports? Are they up-to-date? Are there maybe > some stale files in that particular port directory? The ports tree was installed by copying the ports tree from a working 5.4 install then cvsupping against cvsup5.FreeBSD.org. There shouldn't have been any stale files left behind. After getting the error i tried make clean && make build.... Several time in fact (yes, I know the definition of insanity :) I did manage to fix it, but the solution was a little drastic.... I updated my ports tree again (by now it was a day or two old), tried the broken ports again (still didn't work), upgraded the two ports that were out of date (one was a libtool15). I then did a portupgrade -Rrf glib-2\* because one of the error messages made me think something was wrong with glib. That ended up rebuilding practically everything. After that gstreamer and gpgme built and installed properly. Just looked at http://www.freshports.org/devel/libtool15/ - seems it was a ports bug. The rebuild-everything step probably wasn't necessary. :( Later, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 18:04:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C7E16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:04:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from mdhost1.centroin.com.br (mail-gw1.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88B243D60 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:04:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from trex.centroin.com.br (trex.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.134]) by mdhost1.centroin.com.br (8.13.5/8.13.5/CIP SMTP HOST) with ESMTP id jBQI4mtM053766 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:04:48 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:05:10 -0200 (BRST) From: scuba@centroin.com.br Sender: mpsouza@trex.centroin.com.br To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051226160337.D54299@trex.centroin.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Hits: 0.007 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 200.225.63.205 Subject: DVD burning GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:04:53 -0000 Hi all, Can you point me to some good GUI to CD/DVD burning tools. Thank you, - Marcelo Souza From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 18:12:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F4516A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111BC43D53 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:11:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from clk01a ([66.130.198.54]) by VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IS4004JAAJZ7JO0@VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:11:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:11:53 -0500 From: Nicolas Blais In-reply-to: <20051226160337.D54299@trex.centroin.com.br> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200512261311.58919.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart2299789.3IUE4cdOsb; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20051226160337.D54299@trex.centroin.com.br> User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: scuba@centroin.com.br Subject: Re: DVD burning GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:12:00 -0000 --nextPart2299789.3IUE4cdOsb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On December 26, 2005 01:05 pm, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: > Hi all, > > Can you point me to some good GUI to CD/DVD burning tools. > > Thank you, > > - Marcelo Souza See /ports/sysutils/k3b Nicolas. =2D-=20 =46reeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #7: Mon Dec 26 12:43:20 EST 2005 =20 root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A=20 PGP? (updated 16 Nov 05) : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc --nextPart2299789.3IUE4cdOsb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDsDJu4wTBlvcsbJURAqEtAJ0Ul39t8mx2dYmYDPtq0J8gIT+chwCgmKoW SNbZTspzkxFK7dK/Xmu0vug= =4TfB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2299789.3IUE4cdOsb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 18:14:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6217216A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:14:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from mdhost1.centroin.com.br (mail-gw1.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915F243D55 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:14:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from trex.centroin.com.br (trex.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.134]) by mdhost1.centroin.com.br (8.13.5/8.13.5/CIP SMTP HOST) with ESMTP id jBQIErT2055126; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:14:53 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:15:15 -0200 (BRST) From: scuba@centroin.com.br Sender: mpsouza@trex.centroin.com.br To: Nicolas Blais In-Reply-To: <200512261311.58919.nb_root@videotron.ca> Message-ID: <20051226161417.G54299@trex.centroin.com.br> References: <20051226160337.D54299@trex.centroin.com.br> <200512261311.58919.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Hits: 0.007 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 200.225.63.205 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DVD burning GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:14:57 -0000 Hi Nicolas, I forget to say that I'm using Gnome, does k3b work with it? On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Nicolas Blais wrote: |On December 26, 2005 01:05 pm, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: |> Hi all, |> |> Can you point me to some good GUI to CD/DVD burning tools. |> |> Thank you, |> |> - Marcelo Souza | |See /ports/sysutils/k3b | |Nicolas. |-- |FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #7: Mon Dec 26 12:43:20 EST 2005 |root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A |PGP? (updated 16 Nov 05) : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 19:39:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C2116A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:39:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: from mooseriver.com (h-66-166-146-73.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.146.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C260043D5F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:39:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: by mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 200) id A05C117021; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:39:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:39:28 -0800 From: Josef Grosch To: scuba@centroin.com.br Message-ID: <20051226193928.GA82103@mooseriver.com> References: <20051226160337.D54299@trex.centroin.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051226160337.D54299@trex.centroin.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: Moose River, LLC Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DVD burning GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:39:29 -0000 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 04:05:10PM -0200, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > Can you point me to some good GUI to CD/DVD burning tools. >=20 > Thank you, >=20 > - Marcelo Souza Xcdroast (/usr/ports/sysutils/xcdroast) is pretty good. YOu have to instal the DVD burner tool. All the info on this is found on xcdroast.org. Josef --=20 Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 5.4 jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca. --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFDsEbwy8prLS1GYSERAjogAKDfwEeoWFOpCInmCnGrYr041AGAjgCg5UC4 qYP6O6RVcu11TpFcIwXYxDA= =ZbTP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 19:44:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1E916A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:44:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp2.versatel.nl (smtp2.versatel.nl [62.58.50.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD8C43D58 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:43:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 989 invoked by uid 0); 26 Dec 2005 19:43:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp2.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 26 Dec 2005 19:43:58 -0000 Message-ID: <43B04819.2010503@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:44:25 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051112) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scuba@centroin.com.br References: <20051226160337.D54299@trex.centroin.com.br> <200512261311.58919.nb_root@videotron.ca> <20051226161417.G54299@trex.centroin.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20051226161417.G54299@trex.centroin.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nicolas Blais Subject: Re: DVD burning GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:44:00 -0000 scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: >Hi Nicolas, > > I forget to say that I'm using Gnome, does k3b work with it? > >On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Nicolas Blais wrote: > >|On December 26, 2005 01:05 pm, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: >|> Hi all, >|> >|> Can you point me to some good GUI to CD/DVD burning tools. >|> >|> Thank you, >|> >|> - Marcelo Souza >| >|See /ports/sysutils/k3b >| >|Nicolas. >|-- >|FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #7: Mon Dec 26 12:43:20 EST 2005 >|root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A >|PGP? (updated 16 Nov 05) : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc >| >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Why don't you try it ;) It will work if you install the needed libaries, when installing k3b using the portstree or 'pkg add -r' it will automatically install everything needed for k3b. So the answer is yes, it will work :) Good luck -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 19:46:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110F916A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:46:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from strat-man@comcast.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [63.240.77.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A609243D5A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from strat-man@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (c-67-177-146-29.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[67.177.146.29]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <20051226194600012007pttre>; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:46:00 +0000 From: Victor To: teilhk@crosswinds.net Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:46:17 -0800 Message-Id: <1135637177.28971.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PC-BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:46:02 -0000 > Can PC-BSD be installed in a logical partition? I understand > FreeBSD can > only be installed in a primary partition. > > Teilhard. I'm quite sure you are correct, but I'd ask on the PC-BSD forums, as this list deals with straight FreeBSD. Victor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 20:46:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F121A16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:46:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shanewbbr@yahoo.com) Received: from web53006.mail.yahoo.com (web53006.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FCBD43D6A for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:46:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shanewbbr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 96559 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2005 20:46:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GtYzVbPw2tfbvBKeVtreT4HTXPjdfrpSNPK8SulOt1RQ9qyPFr/GvS0i24qPkeW3gFuSqFnzXgeMZ475Xopaw5NsAfjans39pz5EkTGSKqecmEExrN2O9fyBxkQ+1mso1+RnObBzCxF562VgdCPx9UztO/M/ZEnqFt3yBbqTmMI= ; Message-ID: <20051226204604.96557.qmail@web53006.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.19.140.126] by web53006.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:46:04 PST Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:46:04 -0800 (PST) From: Shane Webber To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: KDE Difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:46:10 -0000 Hello, I have recently installed FreeBSD6-RELEASE that I've downloaded from FBSD.org via Disk1 and 2 onto my Toshiba Satellite P35-S611. I've previously purchased several FBSD Power Packs and haven't had this much difficulty before with my other systems, then again I've been gone for more than four years so I assume I've missed some things. The install was completely successful so far, however I don't know how to set the system up so that when I use "startx" it defaults to KDE or when I use "startkde" from the prompt kde will begin without having a "cannot connect to X server" error. I know the X server (XFree86? or Xorg?, I believe it's xorg because I use top after using startx) must start prior to any GUI. I've searched the handbook and haven't found what I need to get to where I would like my system to be. Your assistance would be appreciated. Thanks v/r Shane __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 20:51:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A90116A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:51:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E101D43D55 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:51:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from clk01a ([66.130.198.54]) by VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IS400FOCHY4XH20@VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:51:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:51:39 -0500 From: Nicolas Blais In-reply-to: <20051226204604.96557.qmail@web53006.mail.yahoo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200512261551.40075.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart2113494.HdDfD9BbMK; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20051226204604.96557.qmail@web53006.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Shane Webber Subject: Re: KDE Difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:51:41 -0000 --nextPart2113494.HdDfD9BbMK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On December 26, 2005 03:46 pm, Shane Webber wrote: > Hello, > I have recently installed FreeBSD6-RELEASE that I've downloaded fr= om > FBSD.org via Disk1 and 2 onto my Toshiba Satellite P35-S611. I've > previously purchased several FBSD Power Packs and haven't had this much > difficulty before with my other systems, then again I've been gone for mo= re > than four years so I assume I've missed some things. The install was > completely successful so far, however I don't know how to set the system = up > so that when I use "startx" it defaults to KDE or when I use "startkde" > from the prompt kde will begin without having a "cannot connect to X > server" error. I know the X server (XFree86? or Xorg?, I believe it's xorg > because I use top after using startx) must start prior to any GUI. I've > searched the handbook and haven't found what I need to get to where I wou= ld > like my system to be. Your assistance would be appreciated. Thanks v/r > Shane > Here's what I use: In my /etc/ttys file, the line for ttyv8: ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/kdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure This starts kdm (the KDE login manager) at boot. Then I am able to go into = KDE=20 without any scripts or 'startkde' or anything. Nicolas. =2D-=20 =46reeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #7: Mon Dec 26 12:43:20 EST 2005 =20 root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A=20 PGP? (updated 16 Nov 05) : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc --nextPart2113494.HdDfD9BbMK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDsFfc4wTBlvcsbJURAl5FAKCdAB5/SPeAP5U4hdK/84CWHw0YHwCbBIjk yBjbNJz6IpKSPwIHduI2OUQ= =JhKD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2113494.HdDfD9BbMK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 20:52:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22AB16A41F; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:52:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC5943D4C; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:52:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBQKpWx4011399; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:51:33 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:52:05 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051226204604.96557.qmail@web53006.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051226204604.96557.qmail@web53006.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512261252.05891.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Shane Webber , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE Difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:52:13 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 12:46 pm, Shane Webber wrote: > Hello, > I have recently installed FreeBSD6-RELEASE that I've > downloaded from FBSD.org via Disk1 and 2 onto my Toshiba Satellite > P35-S611. I've previously purchased several FBSD Power Packs and > haven't had this much difficulty before with my other systems, then > again I've been gone for more than four years so I assume I've missed > some things. The install was completely successful so far, however I > don't know how to set the system up so that when I use "startx" it > defaults to KDE or when I use "startkde" from the prompt kde will > begin without having a "cannot connect to X server" error. I know the > X server (XFree86? or Xorg?, I believe it's xorg because I use top > after using startx) must start prior to any GUI. I've searched the > handbook and haven't found what I need to get to where I would like > my system to be. Your assistance would be appreciated. Thanks v/r > Shane > You need a command in your .xinitrc. For example, I use startx and have=20 the following: # m .xinitrc exec startkde If you add the exec command to .xinitrc, KDE will startup. Kent =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 20:52:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22AB16A41F; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:52:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC5943D4C; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:52:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBQKpWx4011399; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:51:33 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:52:05 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051226204604.96557.qmail@web53006.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051226204604.96557.qmail@web53006.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512261252.05891.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Shane Webber , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE Difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:52:13 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 12:46 pm, Shane Webber wrote: > Hello, > I have recently installed FreeBSD6-RELEASE that I've > downloaded from FBSD.org via Disk1 and 2 onto my Toshiba Satellite > P35-S611. I've previously purchased several FBSD Power Packs and > haven't had this much difficulty before with my other systems, then > again I've been gone for more than four years so I assume I've missed > some things. The install was completely successful so far, however I > don't know how to set the system up so that when I use "startx" it > defaults to KDE or when I use "startkde" from the prompt kde will > begin without having a "cannot connect to X server" error. I know the > X server (XFree86? or Xorg?, I believe it's xorg because I use top > after using startx) must start prior to any GUI. I've searched the > handbook and haven't found what I need to get to where I would like > my system to be. Your assistance would be appreciated. Thanks v/r > Shane > You need a command in your .xinitrc. For example, I use startx and have=20 the following: # m .xinitrc exec startkde If you add the exec command to .xinitrc, KDE will startup. Kent =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 21:34:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8152E16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:34:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9327643D45 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:33:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.60] ([82.35.113.87]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:34:55 +0000 Message-ID: <43B061B1.6010700@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:33:37 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051226160337.D54299@trex.centroin.com.br> <200512261311.58919.nb_root@videotron.ca> <20051226161417.G54299@trex.centroin.com.br> <43B04819.2010503@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <43B04819.2010503@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Dec 2005 21:34:55.0952 (UTC) FILETIME=[36D42D00:01C60A64] Subject: Re: DVD burning GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:34:01 -0000 Frank Staals wrote: > scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> I forget to say that I'm using Gnome, does k3b work with it? >> >> On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Nicolas Blais wrote: >> >> |On December 26, 2005 01:05 pm, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: >> |> Hi all, >> |> >> |> Can you point me to some good GUI to CD/DVD burning tools. >> |> >> |> Thank you, >> |> >> |> - Marcelo Souza >> | >> |See /ports/sysutils/k3b >> | >> |Nicolas. >> |-- |FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #7: Mon Dec 26 12:43:20 EST 2005 >> |root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A |PGP? (updated 16 Nov 05) : >> http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc >> | >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> > Why don't you try it ;) > > It will work if you install the needed libaries, when installing k3b > using the portstree or 'pkg add -r' it will automatically install > everything needed for k3b. So the answer is yes, it will work :) > > Good luck > There's also sysutils/nautilus-cd-burner which I think is gnome based so at least some of its dependencies will already be installed. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 21:34:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDF016A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:34:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from msgmmp-4.gci.net (msgmmp-4.gci.net [209.165.130.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B29C43D62 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:34:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from stargate.akparadise.com ([24.237.206.237]) by msgmmp-4.gci.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.03 (built Jun 27 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0IS400MVMJY7YI20@msgmmp-4.gci.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:34:56 -0900 (AKST) Received: by stargate.akparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id CE8403F87; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:35:01 -0900 (AKST) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:34:47 -0900 From: Beech Rintoul In-reply-to: <20051226162456.40038.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, danial_thom@yahoo.com Message-id: <200512261235.00095.akbeech@gmail.com> Organization: NorthWind Communications MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1293393.cDg2quU5gd; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20051226162456.40038.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:34:59 -0000 --nextPart1293393.cDg2quU5gd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 26 December 2005 07:24 am, Danial Thom wrote: > --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > > On 24 Dec Kent Stewart wrote: > > > There is also the problem that some sites are > > > > designed to work with > > > > > Internet Explorer. You can try to visit with > > > > firefox but that doesn't > > > > > always work even with firefox on XP. > > > > NO site should be designed to work with > > IExplorer. I know it's done, but > > it should not! Why do we have W3C? If we could > > all just do things "by > > the book" the internet would be a much nicer > > place to visit. > > > > People who design for IExplorer are bad! They > > have microsoft in mind and > > _not_ the visitors. I hate it when choice gets > > violated! It should be > > called a crime against freedom. > > No, you're wrong here. You're letting your > religious philosophy cloud your business sense. > You develop to service the highest percentage of > your expected viewer base. The truth is that the > vast majority of visitors to most web sites are > going to be using IE. While using unnecessary > features as a primary component of your site that > ONLY work with IE is foolish, you can't > compromise your design just so that it will work > with the 3% of religious fanatics that refuse to > install IE on thier machines. Business is about > numbers, and the numbers say that your site HAS > to work with IE, and its nice if it works with > others. I generally test with IE, Firefox and > Netscape and I don't care much about much else. > > > I have a friend in the travel biz who gets an > unusual amount of traffic from AOL, because most > of his customers are not computer people. His > site needs to be well tested on AOL, where I > couldn't really give a rat's behind if my > commercial site works with AOL or not. You have > to make sure your site works with the greatest > majority of browsers available that will be > accessing any given site. > > Its unfortunate that MS does what they want > rather than following the standards, but in > reality the standards should follow MS, because > its really the only way to make everything work. > Much of Microsoft's "extra" stuff is pretty > useful and arguably better; its time the unix > geeks get over it and stop whining about the big > bad bully for the good of the big picture. MS > isn't going away anytime soon. The truth is that > anything MS does is a de-facto standard, whether > you like it or not. > > DT I guess we should just throw out w3c and assign the task to microsoft. Whil= e=20 wer'e at it lets get rid of all net standards. After all microsoft is so fa= r=20 ahead we'll never catch up. Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@gmail.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://akparadise.byethost33.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1293393.cDg2quU5gd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDsGIDVq19LUoGB+MRAou4AKCHwdChSujKUChsXtTbGkDAQAfUvACfaF4l +AiOuW3IT440vU0nBr8CaDk= =poyq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1293393.cDg2quU5gd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 21:40:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C22C16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:40:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6D443D4C for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:40:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jBQLeEiU020314; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:40:14 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jBQLeE13020313; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:40:14 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200512262140.jBQLeE13020313@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: zxpmyth@yahoo.com.cn (heromyth) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:40:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to dual boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:40:16 -0000 > > Marty Landman 写é“: > > I'm trying to get a dual boot system set up with FBSD 5.3 and Win XP sp1. > > First I installed FBSD using 15GB of the HD, then installed XP on the > > remaining 5GB. However now it boots up XP automatically. I can get back to > > the FBSD installer by booting from the 5.3 CD but what do I do to provide a > > choice of which to boot right on the HD? Since you failed to follow instructions and loaded MS after other things, it wiped out your FreeBSD MBR. MS is unfriendly that way. The MS MBR is also either too stupid or too selfish to boot any other system. Just put the FreeBSD install CD back in and install the FreeBSD MBR. It will give you a choice as to which to boot. It works just fine. It's only quirk is that, if the MS slice is an NTFS type of filesystem it will identify it as ??? in the menu rather than MS-DOS as it identifies the FAT type file systems. But, just don't worry about that. It works. If you just have to have a more pretty identifying label, you can install something like Grub or one of the other expanded booters. ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 21:54:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC4B16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:54:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C604343D5D for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:54:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from echobase.hoth.dk (echobase.hoth.dk [80.62.210.27]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587035EE049 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:54:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by echobase.hoth.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B2B8919AF6; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:54:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:54:55 +0100 From: "Martin P. Hansen" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051226215455.GA14499@echobase.hoth.dk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200512260703.jBQ73hcu060246@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512260703.jBQ73hcu060246@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: dlink wireless adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:54:58 -0000 On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Imran Imtiaz wrote: > how can i make my dlink DWL-G122 wireless usb adapter work with freebsd? I can't find it in the list of native supported devices (the wi(4) and ath(4) drivers). You might try your luck with the ndis(4) converter. This process is described in detail in the handbook's wireless section: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireless.html I haven't had much luck with this process myself, but it was some time ago. -- Martin P. Hansen | () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | /\ Against HTML Email! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 22:54:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2419A16A420 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:54:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C9D43D76 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:54:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Er1EC-0008Tf-2b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:54:04 +0100 Received: from antik2-ke-13.antik.sk ([87.244.193.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:54:04 +0100 Received: from martinkov by antik2-ke-13.antik.sk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:54:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:53:50 +0100 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260209.44561.kjelderg@gmail.com> <200512262218.30970.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512262332.18703.kjelderg@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: antik2-ke-13.antik.sk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051205 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <200512262332.18703.kjelderg@gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:54:18 -0000 Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 23:18, Yuan Jue wrote: > >>On Monday 26 December 2005 01:09, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: >> >>>>>>is there any software that like Rainlender on Windows? I need to >>>>>>make some notes sometimes, and i think it would be much better if >>>>>>the notes could be always shown on the desktop to remind me. >>>>>>Kontact is great, but not at this point :( >>>>> >>>>>Do you perhaps mean something like kde's knotes? >>>> >>>>thanks for your reply. knotes does its work, but not that well as >>>>Rainlender. I mean its look and interface. can knote be transparent? >>> >>>Sure, kwin can make any application transparent. It appears that knotes >>>on my system just magically is translucent, probably because it is a dock >>>window, but you can set this more specifically for knotes by setting >>>"window specific settings" for the window class knotes. Hope this helps, >> >>I just found a software called gDesklets which I think is wonderful. >>you can find it in >>http://gdesklets.gnomedesktop.org/categories.php?func=gd_show_app&gd_app_id >>=191 it is a WeeklyCalendar. almost fulfill my demand > > > Ah, if you are after something like gdesklets, kde seems to have SuperKaramba > (ports deskutils/superkaramba) which embeds scripts into the desktop in > almost the same way. Not sure if you are still looking for something > different or if you are satisfied with what you have now, > > Eric > hi, what are the main differences/pros/cons between gdesklets and superkaramba please ? m. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 23:05:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9144616A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143A543D5D for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:05:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Er1Og-0002rj-85 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:04:54 +0100 Received: from antik2-ke-13.antik.sk ([87.244.193.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:04:54 +0100 Received: from martinkov by antik2-ke-13.antik.sk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:04:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:04:46 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: <43B0770E.20000@pobox.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: antik2-ke-13.antik.sk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051205 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en Sender: news Subject: FreeBSD Logo Contest -- whom to contact about? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:05:02 -0000 hello, i have got some comments about the winning logo design. who is/are the right person/persons to be contacted regarding this pls? also, could other submitted designs be seen somewhere? (at least top 5 of them) regards, martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 23:20:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F61316A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:20:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from therion@ninth-art.de) Received: from mail.ninth-art.de (coruscant.ninth-art.de [81.169.134.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A152043D55 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:20:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from therion@ninth-art.de) Received: (qmail 6984 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2005 00:20:20 +0100 Received: from 84.62.134.103 by coruscant (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1217. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(84.62.134.103):SA:0(2.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.682921 secs); 26 Dec 2005 23:20:20 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: ++ Received: from dslb-084-062-134-103.pools.arcor-ip.net (HELO ?84.62.134.103?) (therion@ninth-art.de@84.62.134.103) by coruscant.ninth-art.de with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 00:20:19 +0100 Message-ID: <43B07A34.4080009@ninth-art.de> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:18:12 +0100 From: Georg Bege User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: DVD-RAM and packet writing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: therion@ninth-art.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:20:23 -0000 Hi guys, I've been asking this on ##FreeBSD @freenode already, but sadly no one knows. Time to ask this here ;) I've got a CD/DVD recorder: 'HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4167B' and would like to record on DVD-RAM's. Sadly I've never got that packet writing working on FreeBSD, just on Linux - so my guess is FreeBSD doesnt support that yes. All I wanna know is just the information if DVD-RAM recording does work on FreeBSD or not, and if yes then how? My FreeBSD is 6.0-RELEASE-p1 both kernel and userland. I can access DVD-RAM's with the udfclient tools witihn the ports collection but cant record on them, I also tried a blank DVD-RAM (from panasonic) pre-formatted with udf 2.0, mounting is possible but only read-only. Thanks for ya time ppl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 26 23:39:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA8B16A41F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:39:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@ircnow.org) Received: from scott.blazing.de (scott.blazing.de [80.86.187.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849F143D45 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:39:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@ircnow.org) Received: by scott.blazing.de (Postfix, from userid 510) id E46918BDDA; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:39:39 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on scott.blazing.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by scott.blazing.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2ABA8BDB4 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:39:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 frank@ircnow.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:39:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:39:37 +0100 From: Frank Steinborn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051226233937.GA52570@scott.blazing.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260209.44561.kjelderg@gmail.com> <200512262218.30970.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512262332.18703.kjelderg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP: 0x41F1741D User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r581 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:39:42 -0000 martinko wrote: > what are the main differences/pros/cons between gdesklets and superkaramba please ? The main difference is that Gdesklets uses gtk (GNOME) and Superkaramba uses Qt (KDE). You should decide after what of both you are running, because loading the gtk-stuff on KDE will take more ressources (and vice versa). But in fact you have to decide if it's a problem. Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 01:32:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A6616A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:32:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AFD43D5D for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so559235nzb for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:32:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=G43Q81+Jxss7nMHKPx/GbHWINIrhjPsmTH+9V2gGMFa69p4ioDZ2FPJZFwO7SSc4MI95AmsIzyYLr14nuagJJoinGwClo/amoaVHOB5TTefhMlhgtPQulFzUxG3RQTkLCzAbHmbn9t3QK7iupMW6eFhuS6DBOCEv7f0iuvboGOA= Received: by 10.36.247.54 with SMTP id u54mr3705561nzh; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:32:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208151.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.151]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m1sm3728795nzf.2005.12.26.17.32.27; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:32:28 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:35:07 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512270935.07702.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Subject: projector under FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:32:30 -0000 hello, all can projectors be used under FreeBSD? if it could, how? My laptop is HP NC6000, running FreeBSD 6.0 + KDE3.4.3 thanks. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 01:37:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA2016A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:37:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34DC43D5E for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:37:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C58131143; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:07:45 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id E48DE857F4; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:07:44 +1030 (CST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:07:44 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Yuan Jue Message-ID: <20051227013744.GR69668@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <200512270935.07702.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3F6LqILQjGsImgZu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512270935.07702.yuanjue02@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: projector under FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:37:52 -0000 --3F6LqILQjGsImgZu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 27 December 2005 at 9:35:07 +0800, Yuan Jue wrote: > hello, all > > can projectors be used under FreeBSD? Yes. > if it could, how? What's the issue? Plug it in and it should work. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --3F6LqILQjGsImgZu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDsJroIubykFB6QiMRAutrAJ9W2Ngg991MRy8x6JA804eBIAkJYACfXB58 ZSeQ7Iq07Ylt6O6ouN+83Mg= =0gSw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3F6LqILQjGsImgZu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 01:45:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E3816A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:45:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@apriori.net) Received: from modena360.cwihosting.com (modena360.cwihosting.com [209.18.76.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B7C43D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:45:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@apriori.net) Received: from apriori by modena360.cwihosting.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Er3uM-0003p3-01 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:45:46 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user nospam@apriori.net) by www.apriori.net with HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:45:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43514.127.0.0.1.1135647945.squirrel@www.apriori.net> In-Reply-To: <20051226164848.0F9A416A429@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20051226164848.0F9A416A429@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:45:45 -0500 (EST) From: nospam@apriori.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - modena360.cwihosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [688 689] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - apriori.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: That Drive Geometry Bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:45:47 -0000 I am trying to back up the drive I have been using (which is now full) onto a 60GB Seagate IDE drive - ST360020A. After a bunch of failures at configuring the disk, I did some searching on the web and found some info on the "drive geometry bug". I followed the directions I found there - essentially, go into my BIOS at boot time, write down the drive geometry that the BIOS thinks I have and then plug those numbers into FreeBSD fdisk at the beginning of installation. What happened: 1. FreeBSD complained that the drive geometry it was seeing was wrong, and was using its own best guess: 7297/255/63. 2. I hit "G" and edited the C/H/S to that which the BIOS reported: 28733/16/255. 3. I hit Enter; the installer said `Nope, you're wrong! I'm going to use my best guess instead!' No matter how many times I try to enter the info, it changes it back to whatever it thinks is more correct. I tried switching the head and sector info (trying 28733/255/16). but no joy. Is there a way to coax the installer into cooperating? Thanks - -- paz. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 02:25:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B1016A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:25:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBE843D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:25:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1238810nzo for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:25:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=qWp8bWaueHU5BMdv42IhZtRUpcpEULXk4d8zF0wwGAno1MFVhx10napYs6OpV+yQpzlryyTwsnTrlfb6tUxIwdTPG3uTfAX7/1wOZw9rYU3Kr69V5vKVy8hoFi6kI8fA9GC6TjpkfPIu49yghOHZs3jkBT7+zcENxyfeV5Fjcpk= Received: by 10.37.15.56 with SMTP id s56mr3837760nzi; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208151.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.151]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 40sm541140nzf.2005.12.26.18.25.51; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:25:52 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:28:35 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512271028.35748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Subject: author of ath driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:25:53 -0000 hello, all how can I get name of the author who implemented the ath driver? I cannot find any information using "man ath". thanks. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 02:27:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119D816A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:27:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BE3E43D64 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 11256 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 02:27:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=5OLzZoIZ+nJWNEoY2w2gHOqUrzySLkbLQ/xGq3MMJb/Zai+dbbDKVhYjbOEYgmRLf16IFvI8FzxCJfsdOb+7wbZBtZStwHaTDXqcAhQF9M9cqxIX5rvafU/2ur8bRFh8x4t8aVdAeyJuDVwUEHvRdTOX+gASn4EbwkDtnWL4YoQ= ; Message-ID: <20051227022741.11254.qmail@web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:27:41 PST Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:27:41 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Beech Rintoul , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200512261235.00095.akbeech@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:27:46 -0000 --- Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 07:24 am, Danial > Thom wrote: > > --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > > > On 24 Dec Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > There is also the problem that some sites > are > > > > > > designed to work with > > > > > > > Internet Explorer. You can try to visit > with > > > > > > firefox but that doesn't > > > > > > > always work even with firefox on XP. > > > > > > NO site should be designed to work with > > > IExplorer. I know it's done, but > > > it should not! Why do we have W3C? If we > could > > > all just do things "by > > > the book" the internet would be a much > nicer > > > place to visit. > > > > > > People who design for IExplorer are bad! > They > > > have microsoft in mind and > > > _not_ the visitors. I hate it when choice > gets > > > violated! It should be > > > called a crime against freedom. > > > > No, you're wrong here. You're letting your > > religious philosophy cloud your business > sense. > > You develop to service the highest percentage > of > > your expected viewer base. The truth is that > the > > vast majority of visitors to most web sites > are > > going to be using IE. While using unnecessary > > features as a primary component of your site > that > > ONLY work with IE is foolish, you can't > > compromise your design just so that it will > work > > with the 3% of religious fanatics that refuse > to > > install IE on thier machines. Business is > about > > numbers, and the numbers say that your site > HAS > > to work with IE, and its nice if it works > with > > others. I generally test with IE, Firefox and > > Netscape and I don't care much about much > else. > > > > > > I have a friend in the travel biz who gets an > > unusual amount of traffic from AOL, because > most > > of his customers are not computer people. His > > site needs to be well tested on AOL, where I > > couldn't really give a rat's behind if my > > commercial site works with AOL or not. You > have > > to make sure your site works with the > greatest > > majority of browsers available that will be > > accessing any given site. > > > > Its unfortunate that MS does what they want > > rather than following the standards, but in > > reality the standards should follow MS, > because > > its really the only way to make everything > work. > > Much of Microsoft's "extra" stuff is pretty > > useful and arguably better; its time the unix > > geeks get over it and stop whining about the > big > > bad bully for the good of the big picture. MS > > isn't going away anytime soon. The truth is > that > > anything MS does is a de-facto standard, > whether > > you like it or not. > > > > DT > > I guess we should just throw out w3c and assign > the task to microsoft. While > wer'e at it lets get rid of all net standards. > After all microsoft is so far > ahead we'll never catch up. > > Beech Cisco makes their own standards for networking, and if you want to play in the game you have to be compatible. It doesn't really matter what the "accepted" standard is; its the one that *most* people are using. A guy I used to work with used to say at least once a day "The great thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from". You can choose to be a hard-ass or you can do what works. I like to do what works, because thats the best way to be successful. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 02:39:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F24616A420 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:39:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from theguy0000@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C1D43D49 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:39:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from theguy0000@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so831154wxc for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:39:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=tiGY0qtRWHdxHS3ZGKVEkoO6W/Duf0Xc9tq6vJrWI9QO5CIXc4FvDXcfIiBbweti9pIWtH5uuAJf7+jrU9e5eZEg4jN0v8DfKFbptYUH59jY4WvfpnYraQDfgosDznts+SJysffJBqPmXs8Ry8q8rEzcGx9fplOXa4YWeDYsB0g= Received: by 10.70.7.19 with SMTP id 19mr6293485wxg; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.35.11 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:39:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3c613bab0512261839r75ca4a8aj6634d341cd685d94@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:39:48 -0700 From: Matt Roth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:39:49 -0000 If I shrink an existing partition in my hard drive, then there will be empt= y (unpartitioned) space in the disk. Can FreeBSD's installer create a partition to fill this space, or do I have to have a partition there? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 02:41:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDACE16A420 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:41:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE81543D5A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:41:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 23478 invoked by uid 207); 27 Dec 2005 02:41:51 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.30/3.97. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.21):. Processed in 2.759671 secs); 27 Dec 2005 02:41:51 -0000 Received: from dialup21.ach.sch.gr (HELO flame.pc) ([81.186.70.21]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Dec 2005 02:41:47 -0000 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9D62C116C5; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:40:26 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:40:26 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Yuan Jue Message-ID: <20051227024026.GA35396@flame.pc> References: <200512271028.35748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512271028.35748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: author of ath driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:41:53 -0000 On 2005-12-27 10:28, Yuan Jue wrote: > hello, all > how can I get name of the author who implemented the ath driver? > I cannot find any information using "man ath". Look at the cvs logs: http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/sys/dev/ath/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 02:44:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8FA16A425 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luomat@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CED43D8A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:44:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luomat@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so792751wxc for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:44:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=t2R8NUioJ6rsdoIAghMdVGzC5xhayNoDsV7h0vC3eGtQsFPicnXtjpA/QZ+MJFLRTFZU4RFqMkgcC2HpmU4kT8gHNDzcl6yzQG/Etvz/lSvZgFjiS1RfHjPOn+a//xmJlX+AZFk2JEfJaOLbwJ3EPN/OSludIaTTtcyo/hc0VH4= Received: by 10.70.122.14 with SMTP id u14mr787483wxc; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:44:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.70.14 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:44:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:44:20 -0500 From: "Timothy J. Luoma" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Samba "system error 5" even with nt acl support = no X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:44:50 -0000 OK, I had Samba working, upgraded to FreeBSD 6 (from 5.4) and mgetty stopped working, so I had to reinstall FreeBSD 5.4 again. Now I can't get Samba (smbd Version 2.2.12, via pkg_add) working and I can't figure out what I did differently this time. All my hosts are 192.168.x.x My smb.conf is below. I am trying to connect to the FreeBSD machine (hostname "compaq") from a WinXP SP2 machine. I have used 'smbpasswd' to add my WinXP username. When I try to access the machine via Windows Explorer, I get "The account is not authoritzed to log in from this station" When I use 'net view \\compaq' I get "System error 5 has occurred Access is denied " Googling around I found that I should add this " nt acl support =3D no" which I did. Didn't help. Here is my smb.conf [global] workgroup =3D PRESBY nt acl support =3D no server string =3D Samba Server hosts allow =3D 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. load printers =3D yes log file =3D /var/log/log.%m max log size =3D 50 security =3D user socket options =3D TCP_NODELAY dns proxy =3D no [homes] comment =3D Home Directories browseable =3D no writeable =3D yes [printers] comment =3D All Printers path =3D /var/spool/samba browseable =3D no guest ok =3D no writeable =3D no printable =3D yes Other than that, please don't assume anything. I'm no expert on samba. I can FTP to the machine, but I would prefer Samba. Thanks for any help! TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 02:49:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7980816A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:49:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0356D43D6E for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:49:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1241412nzo for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:49:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=jvkvFK9I56OAbLh2uFvmX0X7f2qjHTZe3/rGdLrsQznQZbxQIk9KMqNvDFdBIM94Aep+S126OAsCPvKVQGTypLDz1MB3fO2Y3zPwz6MHeTKYI+CGhy8G9Bv44jnHqIR/aV4okVXB2ATA64zFFj/xlcpLhAT0vrSaOtwY6LkgvI4= Received: by 10.36.250.48 with SMTP id x48mr3869626nzh; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:49:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu208151.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.208.151]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 16sm927548nzo.2005.12.26.18.49.49; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:49:52 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:52:33 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512271028.35748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <20051227024026.GA35396@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20051227024026.GA35396@flame.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512271052.33748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: author of ath driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:49:57 -0000 On Tuesday 27 December 2005 10:40, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-12-27 10:28, Yuan Jue wrote: > > hello, all > > how can I get name of the author who implemented the ath driver? > > I cannot find any information using "man ath". > > Look at the cvs logs: > > http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/sys/dev/ath/ thanks for your information :) one more question, how can I contact these people who contribute to the code? -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 03:40:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDEF16A420 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:40:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53BA43D67 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:40:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 3702 invoked by uid 207); 27 Dec 2005 03:40:37 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.30/3.97. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.21):. Processed in 2.426299 secs); 27 Dec 2005 03:40:37 -0000 Received: from dialup21.ach.sch.gr (HELO flame.pc) ([81.186.70.21]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Dec 2005 03:40:34 -0000 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7080C116E7; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:39:13 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:39:13 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Yuan Jue Message-ID: <20051227033913.GA35772@flame.pc> References: <200512271028.35748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <20051227024026.GA35396@flame.pc> <200512271052.33748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512271052.33748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: author of ath driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:40:41 -0000 On 2005-12-27 10:52, Yuan Jue wrote: >On Tuesday 27 December 2005 10:40, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> On 2005-12-27 10:28, Yuan Jue wrote: >> > hello, all >> > how can I get name of the author who implemented the ath driver? >> > I cannot find any information using "man ath". >> >> Look at the cvs logs: >> >> http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/sys/dev/ath/ > > thanks for your information :) > > one more question, how can I contact these people who contribute to > the code? Through email. All FreeBSD committers (whose names appear in the CVS logs), have a username@FreeBSD.org email address. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 03:41:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1922216A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:41:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4B543D62 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:41:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 3797 invoked by uid 207); 27 Dec 2005 03:41:27 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.30/3.97. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.21):. Processed in 0.085476 secs); 27 Dec 2005 03:41:27 -0000 Received: from dialup21.ach.sch.gr (HELO flame.pc) ([81.186.70.21]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Dec 2005 03:41:26 -0000 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8CE96116E7; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:40:14 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:40:14 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Matt Roth Message-ID: <20051227034014.GB35772@flame.pc> References: <3c613bab0512261839r75ca4a8aj6634d341cd685d94@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3c613bab0512261839r75ca4a8aj6634d341cd685d94@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:41:29 -0000 On 2005-12-26 19:39, Matt Roth wrote: > If I shrink an existing partition in my hard drive, then there will be > empty (unpartitioned) space in the disk. Can FreeBSD's installer > create a partition to fill this space, or do I have to have a > partition there? Sure. As long as the partition is "primary", FreeBSD will be able to boot off it too... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 03:59:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E9A16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:59:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F4543D49 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:59:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1249779nzo for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:59:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=kUhrPxAjmcqrVY/wwiek7V8K7MqJwcFHhGpWuCQCrXt6+Wy0X0njE/jK7TKJaYQKDqYFqd2M999E5Xu5/KDJKXItQ9DFT9xLeFWSDSr1Kj5rLGRxzQ4lGWeGuQOhw2CAbWTqkLmhUkGgTvndEi2fV4DbhsbRkRz2D696wUNKMb8= Received: by 10.36.18.17 with SMTP id 17mr3907299nzr; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:59:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e1sm484838nzd.2005.12.26.19.59.45; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:59:46 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Giorgos Keramidas Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:02:31 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512271028.35748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512271052.33748.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <20051227033913.GA35772@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20051227033913.GA35772@flame.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512271202.31454.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: author of ath driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:59:48 -0000 On Tuesday 27 December 2005 11:39, you wrote: > On 2005-12-27 10:52, Yuan Jue wrote: > >On Tuesday 27 December 2005 10:40, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> On 2005-12-27 10:28, Yuan Jue wrote: > >> > hello, all > >> > how can I get name of the author who implemented the ath driver? > >> > I cannot find any information using "man ath". > >> > >> Look at the cvs logs: > >> > >> http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/sys/dev/ath/ > > > > thanks for your information :) > > > > one more question, how can I contact these people who contribute to > > the code? > > Through email. All FreeBSD committers (whose names appear in the CVS > logs), have a username@FreeBSD.org email address. thanks very much :) -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 04:17:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFFA16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:17:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luomat@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C36F43D53 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:17:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luomat@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so800282wxc for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:17:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mIwqlvIdpVkiB9UnFkLWg2g84PEqM7+gfeAwFAd0kk4jBgSODlBzo78BT4hBTIq7MvcX2nbKjxj9+xFM6EnheuNK9jA0zWNhogLlngojJBiwMMadPQPFEWngK9S5eV930cFw9l1GWUebZP6sN98128w7E4rNLyt7thneQcxvP7o= Received: by 10.70.90.13 with SMTP id n13mr1355161wxb; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:17:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.70.14 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:17:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:17:36 -0500 From: "Timothy J. Luoma" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: Samba "system error 5" even with nt acl support = no X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:17:38 -0000 SOLVED On the XP machine: Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Local Security Policy > Security Settings > Local Policies > Security Options Scroll to: "Microsoft network client: Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers" Double click > Enable Reboot. You could do the same thing in regedit, but why muck with that? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 04:26:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE3816A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:26:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from winelfredpasamba@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5128143D49 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:26:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from winelfredpasamba@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so801048wxc for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:26:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=oFslkwTLGRkySkYGaoCoG54xFza+HlOD24lsqFwyJcSSXt7YIbBUhC3bh51wXOV5gS5DPbipuATDmHXr54GhsehY8d2KvLxzYQHxnop9Iql4NSSq7iK/TMzWsPzWfupnOnr6Mv1eFVnrQavdd64KwcP+PqwGaonBmJ6At2SlOJk= Received: by 10.70.90.13 with SMTP id n13mr1360891wxb; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.113.6 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:26:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:26:37 +0800 From: "Winelfred G. Pasamba" To: danial_thom@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <20051226155759.16443.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20051226155759.16443.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Loren M. Lang" , Yance Kowara , Ted Mittelstaedt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:26:39 -0000 dGVkLCBkYW5pYWwsIGFuZCB0aGUgcmVzdCwKCmknbSBsZWFybmluZyBhIGxvdCBpbiB0aGlzIHRo cmVhZC4KCmkgaGF2ZSBhIHBmc2Vuc2UgKGZyZWVic2QpIHJvdXRlciB0aGF0IGhhcyB0d28gY29u bmVjdGlvbnMgdG8gdGhlIHNhbWUgSVNQCmFuZCBvbmUgY29ubmVjdGlvbiB0byBhIGxpbnV4IHNx dWlkIChhbm90aGVyIHNlcnZlcikuICBpIHVzZSB0aGUgcG9ydGVkCm9wZW5ic2QgcGFja2V0IGZp bHRlciBpbiBmcmVlYnNkIGZvciAod2hhdGV2ZXIpIGxvYWQgYmFsYW5jaW5nLiAgaSBjYW4gcGFz dGUKdGhlIGZyZWVic2QtPi9ldGMvcGYuY29uZiBhbmQgZ2l2ZSB5b3UgYSBzYW1wbGUgb2YgJ3Bm Y3RsIC1zIHN0YXRlJyB3aGljaApsb29rcyBsaWtlIGEgZmlyZXdhbGwgc3RhdGUgdGFibGUgKGkn bSBub3Qgc3VyZSB0aG91Z2gpLiAgaSBjYW4gYWxzbyBjYXB0dXJlCnRyYWZmaWMgZ3JhcGhzIG9u IGFsbCB0aHJlZSBpbnRlcmZhY2VzIG9mIHRoZSBwZnNlbnNlIHJvdXRlci4KCmp1c3Qgd2FudCB0 byBrbm93IHdoYXQncyBoYXBwZW5pbmcgaW4gdGhlIChmcmVlYnNkKSBwZnNlbnNlIHJvdXRlci4g IGlzIGl0CnJvdXRlIGJhbGFuY2luZywgcGFja2V0IHJvdW5kLXJvYmluJ2luZywgY29ubmVjdGlv bi1yb3VuZC1yb2JpbmluZywgb3Igd2hhdD8KCm9uZSB0aGluZyBpcyB0aGF0IGJvdGggdGhlc2Ug aXNwIGxpbmVzIGRvbid0IGhhdmUgYW55IENJUi4gb25lIGlzICJ1cCB0bwoxMjhrYnBzIiBhbmQg dGhlIG90aGVyIGlzICJ1cCB0byAyNTYga2JwcyIuIGFuZCBpIGRvbid0IGtub3cgd2hpY2ggaXMg d2hpY2gsCmhlaGUuCgpoZXJlIGFyZSB0aGUgZ3JhcGhzIGFuZCBkdW1wOgpodHRwOi8vZ2VvY2l0 aWVzLmNvbS93aW5lbGZyZWRwYXNhbWJhL2lzX3RoaXNfbG9hZF9iYWxhbmNpbmdfb3Jfd2hhdC8K Ck9uIDEyLzI2LzA1LCBEYW5pYWwgVGhvbSA8ZGFuaWFsX3Rob21AeWFob28uY29tPiB3cm90ZToK Pgo+Cj4KPiAtLS0gVGVkIE1pdHRlbHN0YWVkdCA8dGVkbUB0b3lib3gucGxhY28uY29tPgo+IHdy b3RlOgo+Cj4gPgo+ID4KPiA+ID4tLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQo+ID4gPkZyb206 IERhbmlhbCBUaG9tCj4gPiBbbWFpbHRvOmRhbmlhbF90aG9tQHlhaG9vLmNvbV0KPiA+ID5TZW50 OiBGcmlkYXksIERlY2VtYmVyIDIzLCAyMDA1IDM6NDcgUE0KPiA+ID5UbzogVGVkIE1pdHRlbHN0 YWVkdDsgTG9yZW4gTS4gTGFuZwo+ID4gPkNjOiBZYW5jZSBLb3dhcmE7Cj4gPiBmcmVlYnNkLXF1 ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZwo+ID4gPlN1YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBGcmVlQlNEIHJvdXRlciB0d28g RFNMCj4gPiBjb25uZWN0aW9ucwo+ID4gPgo+ID4gPgo+ID4gPlRlZCB0aGUgaW5jb21wZXRlbnQs IHdyb25nIG9uIGFsbCBjb3VudHMgb25jZQo+ID4gPmFnYWluOgo+ID4gPgo+ID4gPgo+ID4gPi0t LSBUZWQgTWl0dGVsc3RhZWR0IDx0ZWRtQHRveWJveC5wbGFjby5jb20+Cj4gPiA+d3JvdGU6Cj4g PiA+Cj4gPiA+Pgo+ID4gPj4KPiA+ID4+ID4tLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQo+ID4g Pj4gPkZyb206IERhbmlhbCBUaG9tCj4gPiA+PiBbbWFpbHRvOmRhbmlhbF90aG9tQHlhaG9vLmNv bV0KPiA+ID4+ID5TZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIERlY2VtYmVyIDIxLCAyMDA1IDk6NTYgQU0KPiA+ ID4+ID5UbzogTG9yZW4gTS4gTGFuZzsgVGVkIE1pdHRlbHN0YWVkdAo+ID4gPj4gPkNjOiBZYW5j ZSBLb3dhcmE7Cj4gPiA+PiBmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZwo+ID4gPj4gPlN1 YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBGcmVlQlNEIHJvdXRlciB0d28gRFNMCj4gPiA+PiBjb25uZWN0aW9ucwo+ID4g Pj4gPgo+ID4gPj4gPgo+ID4gPj4gPkFsbCB1cHN0cmVhbSBJU1BzIGFyZQo+ID4gPj4gPmNvbm5l Y3RlZCB0byBldmVyeW9uZSBvbiB0aGUgaW50ZXJuZXQsIHNvCj4gPiBpdAo+ID4gPj4gPmRvZXNu J3QgbWF0dGVyIHdoaWNoIHlvdSBzZW5kIHlvdXIgcGFja2V0cwo+ID4gdG8KPiA+ID4+ID4odGhl IGVudGlyZSBwb2ludCBvZiBhICJjb25uZWN0aW9ubGVzcyIKPiA+ID4+IG5ldHdvcmsuCj4gPiA+ PiA+VGhleSBib3RoIGNhbiBmb3J3YXJkIHlvdXIgdHJhZmZpYyB0bwo+ID4gd2hlcmV2ZXIKPiA+ ID4+ID5pdHMgZ29pbmcuCj4gPiA+Pgo+ID4gPj4gVGhleSBhcmVuJ3QgZ29pbmcgdG8gZm9yd2Fy ZCB5b3VyIHRyYWZmaWMKPiA+ID4+IHVubGVzcwo+ID4gPj4gaXQncyBzb3VyY2VkIGJ5IGFuIElQ IG51bWJlciB0aGV5IGFzc2lnbi4KPiA+IFRvCj4gPiA+PiBkbyBvdGhlcndpc2UgbWVhbnMgdGhl eSB3b3VsZCBwZXJtaXQgeW91IHRvCj4gPiA+PiBzcG9vZiBJUAo+ID4gPj4gbnVtYmVycy4gIEFu ZCB3aGlsZSBpdCdzIHBvc3NpYmxlIHNvbWUgdmVyeQo+ID4gPj4gc21hbGwKPiA+ID4+IElTUCdz IHJ1biBieSBpZGlvdHMgdGhhdCBkb24ndCBrbm93IGFueQo+ID4gYmV0dGVyCj4gPiA+PiBtaWdo dAo+ID4gPj4gc3RpbGwgcGVybWl0IHRoaXMsIHRoZWlyIGZlZWRzIGNlcnRhaW5seQo+ID4gd2ls bAo+ID4gPj4gbm90Lgo+ID4gPgo+ID4gPlllcyB0aGV5IHdpbGwuCj4gPgo+ID4gSSBhc3N1cmUg eW91IHRoZXkgd2lsbCBub3QuCj4gPgo+ID4gPlJvdXRlcnMgcm91dGUgYmFzZWQgb24gZGVzdAo+ ID4gPmFkZHJlc3Mgb25seS4gQXJlIHlvdSBzb21laG93IHN1Z2dlc3RpbmcgdGhhdAo+ID4gYW4K PiA+ID5JU1AgY2FuJ3QgYmUgZHVhbCBob21lZCBhbmQgdXNlIG9ubHkgb25lIGxpbmsKPiA+IGlm Cj4gPiA+b25lIGdvZXMgZG93biwgc2luY2Ugc29tZSBvZiB0aGUgYWRkcmVzc2VzCj4gPiBzZW50 Cj4gPiA+dXAgdGhlIHJlbWFpbmluZyBwaXBlIHdvdWxkbid0IGhhdmUgc291cmNlCj4gPiA+YWRk cmVzc2VzIGFzc2lnbmVkIGJ5IHRoYXQgdXBzdHJlYW0gcHJvdmlkZXI/Cj4gPgo+ID4gSVNQJ3Mg dGhhdCBhcmUgZHVhbC1ob21lZCBoYXZlIHRvIHJlZ2lzdGVyCj4gPiB0aGVpcgo+ID4gc3VibmV0 cyB3aXRoIGJvdGggcHJvdmlkZXJzLgo+ID4KPiA+IEZvciBleGFtcGxlLCBzdXBwb3NlIEknbSBh IHNtYWxsIElTUCBhbmQgSSBnbwo+ID4gZ2V0IGEKPiA+IFNwcmludCBjb25uZWN0aW9uIGFuZCBn ZXQgYXNzaWduZWQgYSByYW5nZSBvZgo+ID4gMTEgSVAgc3VibmV0cywgMTkyLjE2OC4xLjAgLSAx OTIuMTY4LjEwLjAKPiA+Cj4gPiBUaGVzZSBhcmUgU3ByaW50LW93bmVkIElQIGFkZHJlc3NlcyBv ZiBjb3Vyc2UuCj4gPiBBcwo+ID4gSSBzb3VyY2UgdHJhZmZpYyBmcm9tIDE5Mi4xNjguMS54LCBT cHJpbnQKPiA+IHJlY29nbml6ZXMKPiA+IGl0IGFzIHZhbGlkIHRyYWZmaWMgYW5kIGFsbG93cyBp dCB0byBwYXNzCj4gPiBTcHJpbnQncwo+ID4gaW5ncmVzcyBmaWx0ZXIgdG8gbWUuCj4gPgo+ID4g Tm93IEkgZ2V0IGEgYml0IGJpZ2dlciBhbmQgZGVjaWRlIEkgbmVlZCBhCj4gPiByZWR1bmRhbnQK PiA+IGNvbm5lY3Rpb24uICBTbyBJIGNvbnRhY3QgQVJJTiBhbmQgYnV5IGFuIEFTCj4gPiBudW1i ZXIsCj4gPiB0aGVuIGNvbnRhY3QgQVRUIGFuZCBnZXQgYSBjb25uZWN0aW9uIHRvIHRoZW0sCj4g PiB0aGVuCj4gPiBzZXR1cCBCR1AgYmV0d2VlbiBteXNlbGYgYW5kIEFUVCAmIFNwcmludC4KPiA+ Cj4gPiBXaGVuIEFUVCBhbmQgSSBhcmUgc2V0dGluZyB1cCBCR1AsIEFUVCdzIHRlY2hzCj4gPiB3 aWxsCj4gPiBhc2sgbWUgd2hhdCBzdWJuZXRzIEknbSBhZHZlcnRpc2luZywgSSB0ZWxsCj4gPiB0 aGVtCj4gPiAxOTIuMTY4LjEuMCAtIDE5Mi4xNjguMTAuMCAgQVRUIHRoZW4gY2hlY2tzCj4gPiB3 aXRoCj4gPiBBUklOJ3Mgd2hvaXMgc2VydmVyIHRvIG1ha2Ugc3VyZSBTcHJpbnQgaGFzCj4gPiBl bnRlcmVkCj4gPiBhIHJlY29yZCBmb3IgdGhhdCBsaXN0IG9mIHN1Ym5ldHMgdGhhdCBzYXlzIEkn bQo+ID4gYXV0aG9yaXplZCB0byB1c2UgdGhlbS4gIElmIGFsbCB0aGF0IGNoZWNrcyBvdXQKPiA+ IE9LCj4gPiB0aGVuIEFUVCBhZGp1c3RzIHRoZWlyIGluZ3Jlc3MgZmlsdGVycyBzbyBJIGNhbgo+ ID4gc291cmNlIHRyYWZmaWMgdG8gdGhlbSBmcm9tIHRob3NlIHN1Ym5ldHMuCj4gPgo+ID4gTm93 IEkgZ2V0IGV2ZW4gYmlnZ2VyIGFuZCBuZWVkIG1vcmUgSVAncyB0aGFuCj4gPiB3aGF0Cj4gPiBT cHJpbnQgd2lsbCBwcm92aWRlLCBzbyBJIGdvIHRvIEFSSU4gYW5kIGJ1eQo+ID4gdGhlbS4KPiA+ IFRoZW4gYWxsIG15IGZlZWRzIGhhdmUgdG8gYWRqdXN0IHRoZWlyIGluZ3Jlc3MKPiA+IGZpbHRl cnMKPiA+IHRvIHRoZSBuZXcgc3VibmV0Lgo+ID4KPiA+IE5vdyBJIGdldCBldmVuIG1vcmUgYmln Z2VyIGFuZCBJIHN0YXJ0IHRyeWluZwo+ID4gdG8gc2V0dXAKPiA+IHBlZXJpbmcgcmVsYXRpb25z aGlwcyB3aXRoIG90aGVyIG5ldHdvcmtzLCBzbyBJCj4gPiBkb24ndCBoYXZlIHRvIHBheSB0aGVt IGRpcmVjdGx5LiAgV2VsbCBub3cKPiA+IGd1ZXNzIHdoYXQsCj4gPiB0aG9zZSBuZXR3b3JrcyBh cmUgbm93IG1vbml0b3JpbmcgdGhlIHRyYWZmaWMKPiA+IHZvbHVtZQo+ID4gSSdtIHNlbmRpbmcg dGhlbSwgYmVjYXVzZSB0aGV5IGRvbid0IHdhbnQgbWUgdG8KPiA+IHVzZQo+ID4gYW5kIGFidXNl IHRoZW0gYW5kIGdpdmUgdGhlbSBsaXR0bGUgcGVlcmluZyBpbgo+ID4gcmV0dXJuLgo+ID4gU28g SSBub3cgaGF2ZSBhbiBlbm9ybW91cyBmaW5hbmNpYWwgaW5jZW50aXZlCj4gPiB0byBtYWtlCj4g PiBzdXJlIHRoYXQgYW55IHRyYWZmaWMgY29taW5nIGZyb20gYW55IG9mIG15IGVuZAo+ID4gdXNl cnMKPiA+IGlzIGluIGZhY3QgdmFsaWQgdHJhZmZpYywgc28geW91IGJldHRlciBiZWxpZXZlCj4g PiBJJ20KPiA+IGdvaW5nIHRvIGVuZm9yY2UgdGhhdCB3aXRoIGluZ3Jlc3MgZmlsdGVycyB0bwo+ ID4gbXkKPiA+IGRvd25zdHJlYW0gY3VzdG9tZXJzLgo+ID4KPiA+IEFueXdheSwgdGhpcyBpcyBh bGwgYWNhZGVtaWMgYmVjYXVzZSB0aGUKPiA+IHdyb25nbHktc291cmNlZAo+ID4gcGFja2V0IHdv bid0IGV2ZW4gZ2V0IGludG8gbXkgbmV0d29yayB0byBiZQo+ID4gZm9yd2FyZGVkCj4gPiBhbmQg YmxvY2tlZCBieSBBVFQgb3IgU3ByaW50LCBvciBteSBwZWVyCj4gPiByb3V0ZXJzLCBpbiB0aGUK PiA+IGZpcnN0IHBsYWNlLiAgV2h5PyBCZWNhdXNlIGV2ZXJ5Cj4gPiB3cm9uZ2x5LXNvdXJjZWQg cGFja2V0Cj4gPiBJIGFsbG93IGEgY3VzdG9tZXIgdG8gc2VuZCB0byBtZSwgY2FuCj4gPiBwb3Rl bnRpYWxseSBkaXNwbGFjZQo+ID4gYSBjb3JyZWN0IHBhY2tldCBmcm9tIGEgY3VzdG9tZXIsIG1h a2luZyB0aGVpcgo+ID4gdHJhZmZpYyBzbG93ZXIKPiA+IGFuZCBzZXR0aW5nIHVwIHBvdGVudGlh bCBmb3IgY29tcGxhaW50cy4KPiA+Cj4gPiBUaGUgT05MWSBJbnRlcm5ldCByb3V0ZXJzIHRoYXQg ZG9uJ3QgaWdyZXNzCj4gPiBmaWx0ZXIgdG9kYXkgYXJlCj4gPiB0cmFuc2l0IHJvdXRlcnMgcnVu IGJ5IHRyYW5zaXQgQVNzLCBhbmQgbm8KPiA+IG5ldHdvcmsgdGhhdAo+ID4gaXMgd29ydGggYW55 dGhpbmcgYWxsb3dzIGRpcmVjdCBjb25uZWN0aW9ucyB0bwo+ID4gdGhvc2UKPiA+IHJvdXRlcnMg dG8gdGhlaXIgZW5kLXVzZXIgY3VzdG9tZXJzLiAgVGhlcmUgaXMKPiA+IGp1c3QgdG9vIG11Y2gK PiA+IHBvdGVudGlhbCBmb3IgYWJ1c2UsIGFuZCBldmVuIG1vcmUgcG90ZW50aWFsCj4gPiBmb3Ig YmVpbmcKPiA+IGJsYWNraG9sZWQgYXMgYSByb2d1ZSBuZXR3b3JrIGJ5IHRoZSByZXN0IG9mCj4g PiB0aGUgSW50ZXJuZXQuCj4gPgo+ID4gRXZlcnlib2R5IHRvZGF5IHRoYXQga25vd3MgYW55dGhp bmcKPiA+IGFib3V0IHdoYXQgdGhleSBhcmUgZG9pbmcsIGFwcGxpZXMgaW5ncmVzcwo+ID4gZmls dGVycywgb3IKPiA+IHRoZXkgcmVxdWlyZSB0aGVpciBkb3duc3RyZWFtcyB0byBpbmdyZXNzCj4g PiBmaWx0ZXIuICBJbiBmYWN0IEknZAo+ID4gc2F5IHRoaXMgaXMgb25lIG9mIHRoZSByZWFzb25z IENpc2NvIHdhcwo+ID4gZGlzbG9nZWQKPiA+IGFzIHRoZSBjb3JlIHJvdXRlciB2ZW5kb3IgYnkg SnVuaXBlciwgYmVjYXVzZQo+ID4gb2YgdGhlIG5lZWQKPiA+IGZvciBlbm91Z2ggQ1BVIGluIHJv dXRlcnMgY2xvc2VyIGFuZCBjbG9zZXIgdG8KPiA+IHRoZSBjb3JlCj4gPiB0byBiZSBhYmxlIHRv IHJ1biBhY2Nlc3MgbGlzdHMuCj4gPgo+ID4gQ2hhbmNlcyB0b2RheSB0aGF0IGEgY2FibGUgbGlu ZSBvciBhIERTTCBsaW5lCj4gPiBnb2luZyB0byBhbgo+ID4gZW5kIHVzZXIgY291bGQgZ2V0IGEg cGFja2V0IHdpdGggYSBub24tbmV0d29yawo+ID4gc291cmNlCj4gPiB2ZXJ5IGZhciBpbiB0byB0 aGUgSW50ZXJuZXQgYXJlIHppbGNoLgo+ID4KPiA+IE9uZSBvZiB0aGUgbGFyZ2VzdCBzb3VyY2Vz IG9mIGJvZ3VzIHNvdXJjZSBJUAo+ID4gbnVtYmVycyBpbgo+ID4gZmFjdCBhcmUgdGhvc2UgY2hl YXAtYXMtc2hpdCBEU0wvQ2FibGUgcm91dGVycywKPiA+IGFzIHNvbWUKPiA+IG9mIHRob3NlIG1v ZGVscyB3aWxsIEFSUCBib3RoIHRoZWlyIGxlZ2FsIFdBTgo+ID4gSVAgYWRkcmVzcywKPiA+IGFu ZCB0aGUgTEFOIElQIGFkZHJlc3Nlcywgb24gdGhlaXIgV0FOIHBvcnQuCj4gPiBBbGwgb2YgdGhl Cj4gPiBBY3Rpb25UZWMgcm91dGVycyBkbyB0aGlzIGluIGJyaWRnZWQgbW9kZSwgZm9yCj4gPiBl eGFtcGxlLAo+ID4gYW5kIFF3ZXN0IGhhcyB0aG91c2FuZHMgb2YgdGhlbSBkZXBsb3llZC4gIEFu ZAo+ID4gdGhlIHNlY29uZAo+ID4gbGFyZ2VzdCBzb3VyY2UgYXJlIGluZmVjdGVkIFBDJ3MKPiA+ IHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBERG9TIHRyb2phbnMgb24gdGhlbSwgd2hpY2ggc29tZQo+ID4gbW90aGVyc2hp cAo+Cj4gWW91J3JlIG5vdCB1c2luZyBpbGxlZ2FsIGFkZHJlc3NlcyB3aGVuIHlvdSBsb2FkCj4g YmFsYW5jZSwgVGVkLiBZb3UncmUgdXNpbmcgcmVhbCBhZGRyZXNzIHRoYXQgYWxsCj4gb2YgeW91 ciB1cHN0cmVhbSBJU1BzIG5lZWQgdG8ga25vdyBhYm91dC4gV2h5Cj4gY2FuJ3QgeW91IGdyYXNw IHRoaXMgY29uY2VwdD8KPgo+IERUCj4KPgo+Cj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCj4gWWFob28hIERTTCCWIFNvbWV0aGluZyB0byB3cml0ZSBob21lIGFi b3V0Lgo+IEp1c3QgJDE2Ljk5L21vLiBvciBsZXNzLgo+IGRzbC55YWhvby5jb20KPgo+IF9fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVz dGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Cj4gaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmZyZWVic2Qub3Jn L21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMKPiBUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgc2Vu ZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0byAiCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMtdW5zdWJzY3JpYmVAZnJlZWJzZC5v cmciCj4KCgoKLS0KU2VlayB5ZSBmaXJzdCB0aGUga2luZ2RvbSBvZiBHb2QgYW5kIGFsbCB0aGVz ZSB0aGluZ3Mgc2hhbGwgYmUgYWRkZWQgdW50bwp5b3UuCgpXaW5lbGZyZWQgRy4gUGFzYW1iYQpB ZHZlbnRpc3QgVW5pdmVyc2l0eSBvZiB0aGUgUGhpbGlwcGluZXMKQ29tcHV0ZXIgU2NpZW5jZSBE ZXBhcnRtZW50LCBBVVAgT25saW5lIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uIFN5c3RlbQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 04:59:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DF116A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27C843D58 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:59:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBR4wn19084239 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:58:49 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBR4wnqD084238 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:58:49 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:58:49 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200512270458.jBR4wnqD084238@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ker.ipc.maxpipekva error again and again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:59:56 -0000 I am getting the following messages again and again, why it is accuring and how can I correct and track it? Dec 27 00:48:00 darkstar kernel: kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see tuning(7) Dec 27 00:49:00 darkstar kernel: kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see tuning(7) Dec 27 00:51:10 darkstar last message repeated 10 times Dec 27 01:01:10 darkstar last message repeated 41 times Dec 27 01:11:10 darkstar last message repeated 42 times Dec 27 01:21:10 darkstar last message repeated 42 times Dec 27 01:31:10 darkstar last message repeated 43 times Dec 27 01:41:10 darkstar last message repeated 42 times Dec 27 01:51:10 darkstar last message repeated 42 times Dec 27 02:00:00 darkstar last message repeated 38 times regards, Imran Imtiaz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 05:20:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5879F16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:20:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2242643D45 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:20:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBR5JkYC086841 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:19:46 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBR5JjgW086840 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:19:45 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:19:45 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200512270519.jBR5JjgW086840@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: kernel options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:20:46 -0000 where can i find all the customization options of ther kernel? cause in GENERIC kernel there are many options missing so where can i get all the options like if i want to add quota and all others. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 05:23:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBD716A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:23:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from amsfep16-int.chello.nl (amsfep16-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470CA43D5D for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:23:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from [213.200.137.21] by amsfep16-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051227052332.JDND23945.amsfep16-int.chello.nl@[213.200.137.21]>; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:23:32 +0100 Message-ID: <43B0CFD3.4000105@bah.homeip.net> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:23:31 +0100 From: B H User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD-4.10-RELEASE; sv-SE) X-Accept-Language: sv, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Timothy J. Luoma" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Samba "system error 5" even with nt acl support = no X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:23:35 -0000 Timothy J. Luoma skrev: > SOLVED IMHO no! > On the XP machine: > > Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Local Security Policy > > > Security Settings > Local Policies > Security Options > > Scroll to: > > "Microsoft network client: Send unencrypted password to third-party > SMB servers" You put this in your smb.conf {global] encrypt passwords = yes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 05:26:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAC616A420 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:26:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from amsfep16-int.chello.nl (amsfep16-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D497043D96 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:25:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from [213.200.137.21] by amsfep16-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051227052550.JFDC23945.amsfep16-int.chello.nl@[213.200.137.21]>; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:25:50 +0100 Message-ID: <43B0D05D.9070308@bah.homeip.net> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:25:49 +0100 From: B H User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD-4.10-RELEASE; sv-SE) X-Accept-Language: sv, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Timothy J. Luoma" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Samba "system error 5" even with nt acl support = no X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:26:05 -0000 Timothy J. Luoma skrev: > "Microsoft network client: Send unencrypted password to third-party > SMB servers" From smb.conf # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents ; encrypt passwords = yes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 05:28:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9447B16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:28:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from palm_7777@yahoo.ca) Received: from web36114.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web36114.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20C1143D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:28:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from palm_7777@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 85951 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 05:28:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Gp7DeXS11Nh6mtKjbHcPUtGkSxdgOIDQ3IaKzwrDiyMmSB5mk8rUdXOdzJ7/rKn1JI+FjUBl2k3rIKFjk3g+eIvhMAeBGbF5E7Kv7LexNG8stw4AGnVniY5t9U56vBJqRiyOIf8Wo8KO7XtpZhOnmfYnZ4k2/oOo0y1vdBoy2rM= ; Message-ID: <20051227052819.85949.qmail@web36114.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.222.106.133] by web36114.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:28:19 EST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:28:19 -0500 (EST) From: Jon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: 3D Hardware Graphics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:28:20 -0000 Hello all, I'm wondering how to get 3D Hardware graphics going under FreeBSD. I tried both the LibGL.so that came with the driver for my graphics card and the default LibGL.so that came with FreeBSD '/usr/X11R6/lib' but no go, still slow software mode. I have a DRI radeon enabled driver and a radeon driver for xorg.conf, AGP was built into my kernel. What else can I try to get this going? Thanks FreeBSD 6.0 STABLE - ATI Radeon 9800 Pro __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 05:36:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C6216A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:36:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E2043D49 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBR5dlP81052; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:39:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Kent Stewart" , Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:36:26 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <200512260528.14110.kstewart@owt.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:36:30 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kent Stewart >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 5:28 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: BSD Question's. > >Each browser has some technology that they depend on and you >have to use >that browser before you can use their services. The 80/20 rule probably >applies because the banks can program for IE and get 85% of the people >without trippling their web development costs. > No, it is because banks historically are taken advantage of by IT providers. And why not - nobody likes them, if you were lucky enough to get a bank contract you would do it too. It's kind of like doing work for the IRS. Banks always get way overcharged and get the most inapplicable and expensive technology possible. The web dev. houses that get bank contracts overcharge mightily, and put their neophyte designers on the jobs. They have to, by the time the bank pays them it has cost more in legwork to get the money than the job is worth, most times. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 05:47:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C30616A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:47:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A538843D53 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:47:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBR5oWP81084 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:50:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:47:11 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20051226083404.8C5A.GERARD@seibercom.net> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:47:13 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gerard Seibert >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 5:38 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: BSD Question's. > > >I belong to a HS Officials Association. The entire BOCES site, where I >can confirm assignments, etc., is written in VB. I can only use IE to >access that site. > >I have spoken to the director of BOCES operations, and they informed me >that there was no way they were going to change the site. It cost them >many $thousands$ of dollars to have set up. > The last permanent web developer we had on staff wrote lots of sites like this in VB, he never had any trouble in getting them to come up in all browsers. There is no inherent property in VB that when you use it to build a site that it will require IE. The issue is the web developer that put the BOCES site together might have been a = good progrmamer but didn't know much about web development. In short, the BOCES opereation got taken, the director probably knows by now that he screwed up when he wrote the contract with the web dev firm, but he's not going to admit it to you. >I do have to admit that it works flawlessly though. > For now. The problem is that when the next version of IE comes out the onus is on Microsoft to make it compliant with standards first, and make it work with the previous IE versions idiosyncracies later. Without requiring the web developer to deliver a site that's compliant to the published standards, what your going to get is a site that only works with one specific version of IE, and no guarentees it will continue to work with future versions. Eventually it will break, by then you could put a bug in the directors ear that he might write in html standards compliance in the contract he will have to write then to get the site fixed. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 05:58:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE19416A420 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E54043D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBR61jP81116; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:01:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Loren M. Lang" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:58:24 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20051226154813.90594.qmail@web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Yance Kowara , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:58:30 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Danial Thom [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:48 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang >Cc: Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections > > > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >wrote: > >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Danial Thom >> [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >> >Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 3:47 PM >> >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang >> >Cc: Yance Kowara; >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL >> connections >> > >> > >> >Ted the incompetent, wrong on all counts once >> >again: >> > >> > >> >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >> >wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> >From: Danial Thom >> >> [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >> >> >Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM >> >> >To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt >> >> >Cc: Yance Kowara; >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL >> >> connections >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >All upstream ISPs are >> >> >connected to everyone on the internet, so >> it >> >> >doesn't matter which you send your packets >> to >> >> >(the entire point of a "connectionless" >> >> network. >> >> >They both can forward your traffic to >> wherever >> >> >its going. >> >> >> >> They aren't going to forward your traffic >> >> unless >> >> it's sourced by an IP number they assign. >> To >> >> do otherwise means they would permit you to >> >> spoof IP >> >> numbers. And while it's possible some very >> >> small >> >> ISP's run by idiots that don't know any >> better >> >> might >> >> still permit this, their feeds certainly >> will >> >> not. >> > >> >Yes they will. >> >> I assure you they will not. >> >> >Routers route based on dest >> >address only. Are you somehow suggesting that >> an >> >ISP can't be dual homed and use only one link >> if >> >one goes down, since some of the addresses >> sent >> >up the remaining pipe wouldn't have source >> >addresses assigned by that upstream provider? >> >> ISP's that are dual-homed have to register >> their >> subnets with both providers. >> >> For example, suppose I'm a small ISP and I go >> get a >> Sprint connection and get assigned a range of >> 11 IP subnets, 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 >> >> These are Sprint-owned IP addresses of course. >> As >> I source traffic from 192.168.1.x, Sprint >> recognizes >> it as valid traffic and allows it to pass >> Sprint's >> ingress filter to me. >> >> Now I get a bit bigger and decide I need a >> redundant >> connection. So I contact ARIN and buy an AS >> number, >> then contact ATT and get a connection to them, >> then >> setup BGP between myself and ATT & Sprint. >> >> When ATT and I are setting up BGP, ATT's techs >> will >> ask me what subnets I'm advertising, I tell >> them >> 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 ATT then checks >> with >> ARIN's whois server to make sure Sprint has >> entered >> a record for that list of subnets that says I'm >> authorized to use them. If all that checks out >> OK >> then ATT adjusts their ingress filters so I can >> source traffic to them from those subnets. > >So if you have 2 ISPs, then both of them know >about both of your address groups, so you can >load balance any way you want, right? No, they don't know about those groups as I have just finished explaining. >Which is >why the scenario I've suggested will work in all >cases. > Which is why it won't work in all cases. >I also know tons of secondary peering ISPs that >don't do any filtering at all on incoming >traffic. Bullcrap. Prove it. Start naming names and I'll post them on NANOG and ask others opinions. I'm sure the script kiddies looking for DDoS hosts will appreciate knowing who to concentrate their attacks on. >If you're peering with multiple networks >the combinations of source addresses that are >possible to go through your network are too >mind-boggling to load your server with. Most T3 >routers deployed can barely handle their loads >without filtering every incoming packet through >ingress filters. You may think they do it, but >most don't > As I already said core routers don't filter. However, networks that do multiple peering have edge routers that they use to connect to end-node ASs and those filter. >For example, in my office I have a cable modem >and a 100Mb/s link to an ISP that happens to be >in my building. I can set my default router to >either router and it works fine. The cable modem >company will accept ANY source address and so >will the ISP. I assure you that the cable company >doesn't know of my other addresses. > Bullcrap. Once again, prove it. If you think this scenario really exists, post who is involved instead of hiding. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 06:04:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575FD16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:04:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535E843D6A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:04:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBR67nP81131; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:07:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Winelfred G. Pasamba" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:04:28 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20051226155022.70414.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal Cc: pretenda@wrgn.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:04:35 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Danial Thom [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:50 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba >Cc: pretenda@wrgn.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections > > > >As stated, even by Ted, you have to register ALL >of your addresses with ALL of your ISPs, so you >can send your packets to ANYONE you want, even if >they are filtering. > No, what I said is that any ISP that is an end-node AS and gets a feed from a network must tell that network what IP blocks they are using to send traffic from. Network to network peering is a different story - but you won't find DSL or cable providers running DSL lines from their peering routers to end users. All that has to happen is for the end user to start pumping a ton of traffic into the peering router with the source IP number of, say, www.fbi.gov and a destination IP of, say www.whitehouse.gov and all kinds if interesting and unpleasant things will start happening to the operators of that cable or DSL provider once the feds finish tracking them down. Think about it. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 06:12:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C234216A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:12:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338FC43D58 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:12:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBR6FlP81172; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:15:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Loren M. Lang" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:12:26 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20051226155759.16443.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Yance Kowara , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:12:32 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Danial Thom [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:58 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang >Cc: Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections > > > >You're not using illegal addresses when you load >balance, Ted. You're using real address that all >of your upstream ISPs need to know about. Why >can't you grasp this concept? > So you finally figured it out, Danial. These "get one DSL line from one ISP and a cable line from another ISP" schemes will not work precisely because while the upstream ISP's need to know about your real addresses, they don't. ISP A that you have a DSL line to and assigns you 10.0.0.1 as an IP number is expecting traffic to come from you with a destination IP number of anywhere on the Internet, and a source IP number of 10.0.0.1 ISP B that you have a cable line to and assigns you 192.168.0.1 as an IP number is expecting traffic to come from you with a destination IP number of anywhere on the Internet, and a source IP number of 192.168.0.1 If you use 10.0.0.1 as a source IP for a packet that you send to ISP B, then ISP B's ingress filters will not see this packet with a source IP of 192.168.0.1, and assume it's bogus, and drop it. If you use 192.168.0.1 as a source IP for a packet that you send to ISP A, then ISP A's ingress filters will not see this packet with a source IP of 10.0.0.1, and assume it's bogus, and drop it. Very simple concept for anyone to grasp. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 07:04:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF58D16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:04:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E9743D53 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:04:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D31062C86C for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:04:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89755-04 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:04:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB5762C854 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:04:01 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2A11C33C2B; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:27:13 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 905F438C3A; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:37:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3B833C2B for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:37:55 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:37:55 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051227012803.W1087@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: iLO Management Console for X ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:04:04 -0000 Been doing some more research on HPs iLO interface for their Proliant servers, and it looks sweet ... I really hate the idea of having to have multiple web browser windows opened up for multiple servers though ... Does anyone know of anything, ready or being worked on, that I could run, preferably under X, on my desktop that would integrate monitoring of multiple servers? I've searched ports for 'ilo', but that isn't showing up anything ... but figured I'd see if maybe there is/was something not in ports yet ... thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 07:11:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B12716A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:11:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C446043D60 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:11:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBR7F5P81456; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:15:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Michael C. Shultz" , Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:11:43 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20051226165953.36072.qmail@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal Cc: "Daniel A." , Andy Sjostrom Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:11:55 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Danial Thom [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 9:00 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Michael C. Shultz; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Cc: Daniel A.; Andy Sjostrom >Subject: RE: BSD Question's. > > > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >wrote: > >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On >> Behalf Of Danial Thom >> >Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:34 AM >> >To: Michael C. Shultz; >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Cc: Daniel A.; Andy Sjostrom >> >Subject: Re: BSD Question's. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >--- "Michael C. Shultz" >> >wrote: >> > >> >> On Saturday 24 December 2005 06:54, Daniel >> A. >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Andy, >> >> > >> >> > I am sorry for the trouble you have had >> with >> >> Windows XP. >> >> > >> >> > I suggest that you use Linux, as FreeBSD >> >> really is not targeted at >> >> > people who want to use graphical user >> >> interfaces. >> >> >> >> In a few key areas FreeBSD is a better >> desktop >> >> OS than Linux: Easier to keep >> >> the kernel/world and installed ports up to >> date >> >> for example without having >> >> to resort to the microsoft/Linux fixall >> method >> >> of removing and reinstalling >> >> everything every now and again. Your >> opinion >> >> is correct IMO that FreeBSD >> >> managers put most emphasis on FreeBSD as a >> >> server and little as a desktop. >> >> My guess is because donations(cash) and >> >> hardware support for developers >> >> come from people who want servers while >> people >> >> who want a desktop OS tend to >> >> donate squat.... >> >> >> >> > The linux developers really have been >> trying >> >> to make a valuable >> >> > replacement for Windows, as they somehow >> have >> >> experienced the same >> >> > issues with Windows (And Microsoft >> products >> >> in general) that you have. >> >> > >> >> > One Linux distribution in particular that >> I >> >> think you might like, is >> >> > Ubuntu. You can download it at >> >> http://www.ubuntulinux.org/, or order a >> >> > CD (Free shipping, free CD, you pay >> nothing). >> >> >> >> Advertising Linux in a FreeBSD mailing list? >> >> >> Sounds like you may have more of >> >> axe to grind against the FreeBSD management >> >> folk than a desire to offer sound >> >> advice.... >> >> >> >> -Mike >> > >> >Why not just tell the truth, which is that >> >Windows XP is the best that you can do for the >> >desktop, and that there is no perfect solution >> >that works perfectly in every scenario? >> >> This ignores a very important fact: the needs >> of >> a home user for a desktop OS are rapidly >> becoming >> very different than the needs of a corporation >> for >> a desktop OS. >> >> Windows XP is the best desktop OS you can have >> on >> the $499.99 computers that they sell with the >> operating >> system preloaded down at Best Buy, and that are >> purchased >> by the typical home user. >> >> But it is a serious problem for the average >> corporation. >> Many of them are deploying Microsoft Terminal >> Server >> and using Winterms, or Linux systems running >> remote >> desktop, terminal served into the TS. >> >> In this manner they can provide the user with >> access to the apps that they are trained on, >> such >> as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, etc. in a >> controlled >> fashion that does not permit the user to >> download >> the latest virus-of-the-month, or crap-up their >> system with the latest screen-saver from the >> Weather channel that tanks the Internet >> connection >> every 3 minutes downloading a 1MB jpg file of >> the >> weather in San Francisco. > >This thinking is more about the lack of >innovation of consultants and network staff than >necessity. There are simple filters and bandwidth >management that can manage networks at the egress >without having to adulterate your network with a >lot of crap like this. What you do on the >intranet and how you interact outside of your >local network are mutually exclusive components. > It depends on the business. If your running a call center in Punjab, India you can pretty well lock down access to the Internet because your employees are supposed to be answering the telephone, not surfing Ebay. But if your running a modern office then it is a lot harder for businesses to deny access to the Internet, websurfing, etcetera, espically when the person demaning access happens to be, for example, the Director of Marketing who's pulling down 6 figures and is ordering you to permit unfettered Internet access to himself, and all his employees that work under him. And he's one of the CEO's golfing buddies to boot. The other issue is suppose the corporation decided a while back to outsource every last man-dog IT person they had. Now they are paying some outsourcing firm to manage their desktops. That firm charges quadruple if they have to send a warm body to a desktop to fix something vs if they can fix it remotely. If everyone is terminal served in, then the outsourcing firm can have a guy in Punjab, India, remote into the terminal server and fix it. I'm not saying that terminal server is a solution for all offices, or even a good solution for any of them. But, there are very different issues that become important for a corporation supporting a lot of Windows desktops, that aren't an issue for a single Windows home user who is competent to manage his own Windows system. Most of the criticism I see in this mailing list of Windows is from the home-user perspective, and not from the business user perspective. People complain for example of Windows being unstable - because they are running it on some $200-made-in-basement clone, whereas most businesses buy Dell or HP/Compaq desktops that come preloaded, and have been tested 6 ways to Sunday for stability with Windows. >With laptops being so prevalent now; the ability >to allow users to pop a standard machine onto a >corporate network is absolutely ESSENTIAL for >maximum productivity. I got news for you, the laptops are disappearing, and being replaced by Windows CE devices, running Windows CE Terminal Services Client (CETSC). People like these systems better than laptops, they are lighter and more portable. And nowadays you can get wireless cards for them that will do higher speed cellular-style wireless so you can use them anywhere. Laptops in particular are the bane of the corporation, they are expensive, very very fragile, and very prone to being stolen. (I've personally had 3 stolen out of my car in the last 5 years, all of them the thieves broke windows, fortunately all of them were old devices I only used for running ASCII terminal emulators on) And for the road warriors that do run laptops, the big thing I see these days are people yarding laptops around with wireless NICs in them, jacking in at coffee shops, airports, and wireless networks at their customers offices, then running a VPN client into their home company network and firing up terminal server client. >The ability to >transparently protect your users without having >to deploy "different" equipment than standard >XP-type desktops is what separates the men from >the boys. > It is not that companies can't protect users that run standard legacy approaches to computing, it is that it is more expensive, in many cases a lot more expensive, than simply setting the systems up as dumb terminals and terminal-serving into a Microsoft terminal server. If done right, the vast majority of users don't even realize that their copy of Word or Excel or Powerpoint or whatever isn't even executing on the CPU of the system that they have in front of them. Microsoft has recognized this, which is why they are releasing Windows Fundamentals, see: http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/programs/sa/benefits/fundamentals.mspx >Something important to understand is that what >"corporations" do is a function of the talent >that they have making recommendations. Its not >necessarily the "right" thing; in fact is almost >never is. That is accurate. >What's ironic is that "corporations" >hire cheaper consultants who end up making them >spend much more in the long run because of their >lack of innovation. > You don't "spend more in the long run" because of lack of innovation. In fact, innovation is a really overused word, it's used as a political label by most people to attack people and products, they say "he's not innovative" or "it's not an innovative product" Well, if I go down to the store to purchase stainless steel tableware, the knives, forks and spoons I'm going to get are the same as the ones they were selling 30 years ago, that must mean those manufacturers do not innovate their products, so they all must be bad, so we should just stop buying knives, forks and spoons and eat with our hands. You see how silly an attack on "lack of innovation" can be without any context to explain the charge. People spend more in the long run because they make bad decisions on what will happen in the future, either they are incompetent and the decisions are bad from day 1, or the decisions were the right ones at the time and become bad later on. It is true you have a greater chance of getting an incompetent consultant if you hire consultants on price only - but even a competent consultant can make a good decision that over time becomes the more expensive one - because things change unexpectedly. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 07:30:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7731916A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:30:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D7CC43D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:30:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2005 07:30:56 -0000 Received: from 156.49.78.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO storage.mine.nu) [83.78.49.156] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 08:30:56 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Received: from storage.mine.nu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBR7U2Tv073766; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:30:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@storage.mine.nu) Received: (from lars@localhost) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBR7U1Vm073765; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:30:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:30:01 +0100 From: lars To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20051227073001.GA73747@storage.mine.nu> References: <20051227012803.W1087@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051227012803.W1087@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iLO Management Console for X ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:30:58 -0000 "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > Been doing some more research on HPs iLO interface for their Proliant > servers, and it looks sweet ... I really hate the idea of having to have > multiple web browser windows opened up for multiple servers though ... > > Does anyone know of anything, ready or being worked on, that I could run, > preferably under X, on my desktop that would integrate monitoring of > multiple servers? I've searched ports for 'ilo', but that isn't showing > up anything ... but figured I'd see if maybe there is/was something not in > ports yet ... > > thanks ... > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 Maybe this may help you in some way, though not with X: http://people.freebsd.org/~jcagle/ > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 07:44:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79DE16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:44:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2285343D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:44:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26511DD518; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:44:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:49:51 +0100 From: cpghost To: Yuan Jue Message-ID: <20051227074951.GA34494@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <200512270935.07702.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512270935.07702.yuanjue02@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: projector under FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:44:54 -0000 On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 09:35:07AM +0800, Yuan Jue wrote: > hello, all > > can projectors be used under FreeBSD? if it could, how? > > My laptop is HP NC6000, running FreeBSD 6.0 + KDE3.4.3 Sure. Just make sure to run X with one of the standard VESA resolutions (e.g. 800x600, 1024x768). Most projectors don't like exotic settings. > thanks. > > -- > Best Regards. > Yuan Jue Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 07:50:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D6C16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:50:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CF043D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:49:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.90] (pool-71-109-244-179.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.244.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBR7nvIS011623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:49:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <03683319-0CC1-4367-BCBC-29D0D4B97D41@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions From: Doug Hardie Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:49:55 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1218/Mon Dec 26 05:46:59 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:50:00 -0000 I am upgrading a server to 6.0 and encountered an error in make buildworld. However, I don't know what the error was as I piped stdout to a file, but not stderr. It was fairly near the end so I really hate to restart from the beginning again. The master server is a fairly slow machine. When something like this happens, is there a way to restart the make where it died? Is there an easy way to build the specific module that failed to get the complete errors? In this case the module was /usr/libexec/telnet. I went to /usr/src/ libexec/telnet and did a make. It completed without any problems. So, I ended up restarting the make from the top again, but would like to know for future situations. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 08:41:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C2716A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:41:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AE343D49 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:41:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-231.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.231]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6524B1C6; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:49:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A2D5285C; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:39:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43B0FE17.9010308@spray.se> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:40:55 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Hardie References: <03683319-0CC1-4367-BCBC-29D0D4B97D41@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <03683319-0CC1-4367-BCBC-29D0D4B97D41@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:41:10 -0000 Doug Hardie schrieb: > I am upgrading a server to 6.0 and encountered an error in make > buildworld. However, I don't know what the error was as I piped stdout > to a file, but not stderr. It was fairly near the end so I really hate > to restart from the beginning again. The master server is a fairly > slow machine. When something like this happens, is there a way to > restart the make where it died? Is there an easy way to build the > specific module that failed to get the complete errors? In this case > the module was /usr/libexec/telnet. I went to /usr/src/ libexec/telnet > and did a make. It completed without any problems. So, I ended up > restarting the make from the top again, but would like to know for > future situations. Thanks. Try "make -DNO_CLEAN buildworld" next time. This prevents the build script from deleting object files in /usr/obj. Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 08:48:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A63316A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:48:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D601843D49 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:48:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-231.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.231]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D580F4C3F0; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:57:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB705285C; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:47:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43B0FFFB.7060303@spray.se> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:48:59 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon References: <20051227052819.85949.qmail@web36114.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051227052819.85949.qmail@web36114.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3D Hardware Graphics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:48:48 -0000 Jon schrieb: > Hello all, > > I'm wondering how to get 3D Hardware graphics going > under FreeBSD. > I tried both the LibGL.so that came with the driver > for my graphics card and the default LibGL.so that > came with FreeBSD '/usr/X11R6/lib' but no go, still > slow software mode. I have a DRI radeon enabled driver > and a radeon driver for xorg.conf, AGP was built into > my kernel. What else can I try to get this going? > > Thanks > FreeBSD 6.0 STABLE - ATI Radeon 9800 Pro This is almost not possible because ATI doesn't provide a driver for FreeBSD and the driver that comes with X.org supports only models up to Radeon 9000 concerning 3D capabilities; you'll find more information about supported cards in the "radeon" manpage of the xorg-server package. There is an open source project that aims 3D support for more recent cards: http://r300.sourceforge.net/R300.php Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 08:51:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CCF16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:51:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B5B43D55 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:51:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-231.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.231]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEFA4C3EF; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:59:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9895285C; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:49:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43B1008A.5030207@spray.se> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:51:22 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Imran Imtiaz References: <200512270519.jBR5JjgW086840@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> In-Reply-To: <200512270519.jBR5JjgW086840@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:51:10 -0000 Imran Imtiaz schrieb: > where can i find all the customization options of ther kernel? See src/sys/conf/NOTES for platform-independent options and for example src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES for i386-specific options. Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 08:52:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED74E16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:52:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6572543D78 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:52:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBR8tNP81894; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:55:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Beech Rintoul" , Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:52:02 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20051227022741.11254.qmail@web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:52:18 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Danial Thom >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 6:28 PM >To: Beech Rintoul; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: BSD Question's. > > > > >--- Beech Rintoul wrote: > >> On Monday 26 December 2005 07:24 am, Danial >> Thom wrote: >> > --- dick hoogendijk wrote: >> > > On 24 Dec Kent Stewart wrote: >> > > > There is also the problem that some sites >> are >> > > >> > > designed to work with >> > > >> > > > Internet Explorer. You can try to visit >> with >> > > >> > > firefox but that doesn't >> > > >> > > > always work even with firefox on XP. >> > > >> > > NO site should be designed to work with >> > > IExplorer. I know it's done, but >> > > it should not! Why do we have W3C? If we >> could >> > > all just do things "by >> > > the book" the internet would be a much >> nicer >> > > place to visit. >> > > >> > > People who design for IExplorer are bad! >> They >> > > have microsoft in mind and >> > > _not_ the visitors. I hate it when choice >> gets >> > > violated! It should be >> > > called a crime against freedom. >> > >> > No, you're wrong here. You're letting your >> > religious philosophy cloud your business >> sense. >> > You develop to service the highest percentage >> of >> > your expected viewer base. The truth is that >> the >> > vast majority of visitors to most web sites >> are >> > going to be using IE. While using unnecessary >> > features as a primary component of your site >> that >> > ONLY work with IE is foolish, you can't >> > compromise your design just so that it will >> work >> > with the 3% of religious fanatics that refuse >> to >> > install IE on thier machines. Business is >> about >> > numbers, and the numbers say that your site >> HAS >> > to work with IE, and its nice if it works >> with >> > others. I generally test with IE, Firefox and >> > Netscape and I don't care much about much >> else. >> > >> > >> > I have a friend in the travel biz who gets an >> > unusual amount of traffic from AOL, because >> most >> > of his customers are not computer people. His >> > site needs to be well tested on AOL, where I >> > couldn't really give a rat's behind if my >> > commercial site works with AOL or not. You >> have >> > to make sure your site works with the >> greatest >> > majority of browsers available that will be >> > accessing any given site. >> > >> > Its unfortunate that MS does what they want >> > rather than following the standards, but in >> > reality the standards should follow MS, >> because >> > its really the only way to make everything >> work. >> > Much of Microsoft's "extra" stuff is pretty >> > useful and arguably better; its time the unix >> > geeks get over it and stop whining about the >> big >> > bad bully for the good of the big picture. MS >> > isn't going away anytime soon. The truth is >> that >> > anything MS does is a de-facto standard, >> whether >> > you like it or not. >> > >> > DT >> >> I guess we should just throw out w3c and assign >> the task to microsoft. While >> wer'e at it lets get rid of all net standards. >> After all microsoft is so far >> ahead we'll never catch up. >> >> Beech > > >Cisco makes their own standards for networking, >and if you want to play in the game you have to >be compatible. They do - however they clearly delineate between their standard (for example IGRP) and the public standard (ie: OSPF) and when they support both, they endeavor to adhere to the public standard, in their implementation of it. There would not be a problem if Microsoft inserted a switch in IE where the user could select M-HTML (Microsoft HTML) or W3C-HTML (actual HTML). The problem is that Microsoft intermixes the two. >It doesn't really matter what the >"accepted" standard is; its the one that *most* >people are using. > If W3C adopted all the Microsoft changes to HTML it would not help, Microsoft would break them in future versions. Even in the Microsoft way, there is no consistency in Microsoft's own so-called standards. >A guy I used to work with used to say at least >once a day "The great thing about standards is >that there are so many to choose from". I think a lot of people would be happy to go with the Microsoft standard if it wasn't a constantly changing target. It defeats the purpose of a standard to begin with. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 09:42:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B158C16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:42:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A419B43D58 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:42:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBR9k0P82123; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:46:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Winelfred G. Pasamba" , Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:42:39 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: "Loren M. Lang" , Yance Kowara , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:42:47 -0000 Does it meet the test I already outlined? Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a remote server, with both lines connected. Time it. Disconnect 1 line, then repeat the test. If the time to download and upload when both DSL lines are connected is half the time it takes when 1 DSL line is connected, then your load-balancing. If not, then you are not - although if it makes you feel like you haven't wasted your money claim your "per session load balancing" then I suppose it would be uncharitable to make you feel bad by pointing out that this is purely a marketing term with no networking significance. Oops. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Winelfred G. >Pasamba >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 8:27 PM >To: danial_thom@yahoo.com >Cc: Loren M. Lang; Yance Kowara; Ted Mittelstaedt; >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections > > >ted, danial, and the rest, > >i'm learning a lot in this thread. > >i have a pfsense (freebsd) router that has two connections to >the same ISP >and one connection to a linux squid (another server). i use the ported >openbsd packet filter in freebsd for (whatever) load balancing. > i can paste >the freebsd->/etc/pf.conf and give you a sample of 'pfctl -s >state' which >looks like a firewall state table (i'm not sure though). i can >also capture >traffic graphs on all three interfaces of the pfsense router. > >just want to know what's happening in the (freebsd) pfsense >router. is it >route balancing, packet round-robin'ing, >connection-round-robining, or what? > >one thing is that both these isp lines don't have any CIR. one is "up to >128kbps" and the other is "up to 256 kbps". and i don't know >which is which, >hehe. > >here are the graphs and dump: >http://geocities.com/winelfredpasamba/is_this_load_balancing_or_what/ > >On 12/26/05, Danial Thom wrote: >> >> >> >> --- Ted Mittelstaedt >> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > >-----Original Message----- >> > >From: Danial Thom >> > [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >> > >Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 3:47 PM >> > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang >> > >Cc: Yance Kowara; >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> > >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL >> > connections >> > > >> > > >> > >Ted the incompetent, wrong on all counts once >> > >again: >> > > >> > > >> > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >> > >wrote: >> > > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >-----Original Message----- >> > >> >From: Danial Thom >> > >> [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >> > >> >Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM >> > >> >To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt >> > >> >Cc: Yance Kowara; >> > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> > >> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL >> > >> connections >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >All upstream ISPs are >> > >> >connected to everyone on the internet, so >> > it >> > >> >doesn't matter which you send your packets >> > to >> > >> >(the entire point of a "connectionless" >> > >> network. >> > >> >They both can forward your traffic to >> > wherever >> > >> >its going. >> > >> >> > >> They aren't going to forward your traffic >> > >> unless >> > >> it's sourced by an IP number they assign. >> > To >> > >> do otherwise means they would permit you to >> > >> spoof IP >> > >> numbers. And while it's possible some very >> > >> small >> > >> ISP's run by idiots that don't know any >> > better >> > >> might >> > >> still permit this, their feeds certainly >> > will >> > >> not. >> > > >> > >Yes they will. >> > >> > I assure you they will not. >> > >> > >Routers route based on dest >> > >address only. Are you somehow suggesting that >> > an >> > >ISP can't be dual homed and use only one link >> > if >> > >one goes down, since some of the addresses >> > sent >> > >up the remaining pipe wouldn't have source >> > >addresses assigned by that upstream provider? >> > >> > ISP's that are dual-homed have to register >> > their >> > subnets with both providers. >> > >> > For example, suppose I'm a small ISP and I go >> > get a >> > Sprint connection and get assigned a range of >> > 11 IP subnets, 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 >> > >> > These are Sprint-owned IP addresses of course. >> > As >> > I source traffic from 192.168.1.x, Sprint >> > recognizes >> > it as valid traffic and allows it to pass >> > Sprint's >> > ingress filter to me. >> > >> > Now I get a bit bigger and decide I need a >> > redundant >> > connection. So I contact ARIN and buy an AS >> > number, >> > then contact ATT and get a connection to them, >> > then >> > setup BGP between myself and ATT & Sprint. >> > >> > When ATT and I are setting up BGP, ATT's techs >> > will >> > ask me what subnets I'm advertising, I tell >> > them >> > 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.10.0 ATT then checks >> > with >> > ARIN's whois server to make sure Sprint has >> > entered >> > a record for that list of subnets that says I'm >> > authorized to use them. If all that checks out >> > OK >> > then ATT adjusts their ingress filters so I can >> > source traffic to them from those subnets. >> > >> > Now I get even bigger and need more IP's than >> > what >> > Sprint will provide, so I go to ARIN and buy >> > them. >> > Then all my feeds have to adjust their ingress >> > filters >> > to the new subnet. >> > >> > Now I get even more bigger and I start trying >> > to setup >> > peering relationships with other networks, so I >> > don't have to pay them directly. Well now >> > guess what, >> > those networks are now monitoring the traffic >> > volume >> > I'm sending them, because they don't want me to >> > use >> > and abuse them and give them little peering in >> > return. >> > So I now have an enormous financial incentive >> > to make >> > sure that any traffic coming from any of my end >> > users >> > is in fact valid traffic, so you better believe >> > I'm >> > going to enforce that with ingress filters to >> > my >> > downstream customers. >> > >> > Anyway, this is all academic because the >> > wrongly-sourced >> > packet won't even get into my network to be >> > forwarded >> > and blocked by ATT or Sprint, or my peer >> > routers, in the >> > first place. Why? Because every >> > wrongly-sourced packet >> > I allow a customer to send to me, can >> > potentially displace >> > a correct packet from a customer, making their >> > traffic slower >> > and setting up potential for complaints. >> > >> > The ONLY Internet routers that don't igress >> > filter today are >> > transit routers run by transit ASs, and no >> > network that >> > is worth anything allows direct connections to >> > those >> > routers to their end-user customers. There is >> > just too much >> > potential for abuse, and even more potential >> > for being >> > blackholed as a rogue network by the rest of >> > the Internet. >> > >> > Everybody today that knows anything >> > about what they are doing, applies ingress >> > filters, or >> > they require their downstreams to ingress >> > filter. In fact I'd >> > say this is one of the reasons Cisco was >> > disloged >> > as the core router vendor by Juniper, because >> > of the need >> > for enough CPU in routers closer and closer to >> > the core >> > to be able to run access lists. >> > >> > Chances today that a cable line or a DSL line >> > going to an >> > end user could get a packet with a non-network >> > source >> > very far in to the Internet are zilch. >> > >> > One of the largest sources of bogus source IP >> > numbers in >> > fact are those cheap-as-shit DSL/Cable routers, >> > as some >> > of those models will ARP both their legal WAN >> > IP address, >> > and the LAN IP addresses, on their WAN port. >> > All of the >> > ActionTec routers do this in bridged mode, for >> > example, >> > and Qwest has thousands of them deployed. And >> > the second >> > largest source are infected PC's >> > that have DDoS trojans on them, which some >> > mothership >> >> You're not using illegal addresses when you load >> balance, Ted. You're using real address that all >> of your upstream ISPs need to know about. Why >> can't you grasp this concept? >> >> DT >> >> >> >> __________________________________________ >> Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. >> Just $16.99/mo. or less. >> dsl.yahoo.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > >-- >Seek ye first the kingdom of God and all these things shall be >added unto >you. > >Winelfred G. Pasamba >Adventist University of the Philippines >Computer Science Department, AUP Online Information System > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.7/214 - Release Date: >12/23/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 10:15:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E7916A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:15:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E012043D4C for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:15:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:15:05 +0100 id 0003982E.43B11429.00001BE1 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:15:05 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051227101505.GA7107@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <200512261235.00095.akbeech@gmail.com> <20051227022741.11254.qmail@web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051227022741.11254.qmail@web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:15:08 -0000 On 26 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > It doesn't really matter what the "accepted" standard is; its the one > that *most* people are using. Bring this "rule" to society and it won't take all that much time before we'll live in a jungle (happely ever after ? ;-) It's the decease of this era that lost of people find it diffcult to honor rules except their own. I know the saying "money makes the world turn around" I disagree. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 10:22:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E5B16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:22:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin@gish.demon.nl) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C9C43D4C for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:22:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin@gish.demon.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:20270 helo=ZGISH) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ErByf-0006UM-Fm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:22:45 +0000 From: "Kiffin Gish" To: Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:22:45 +0100 Message-ID: <000501c60acf$7a678330$2101a8c0@ZGISH> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Wireless woes: upgrade 5.4 to 6.0, wi0, etc... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:22:55 -0000 Since I upgraded from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.0, I cannot for the life of me = get the wi0-interface to work at all (real bummer). During boot I get the following error message: "ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_wep module by hand for now" If afterwards I try to fiddle around with ifconfig wepmode on ..., I get = the following error message: "ifconfig: SIOCS80211: Operation not permitted" Googling around and searching through the NOTES, UPDATING etc. I have discovered (low-level technical) bits and pieces but nothing I can = really bit into. Some stuff about wpa, wpa_supplicant.conf ad infinitum, but = before I start doing something major and messing up my system for good, I = though I would drop this questions amongst the experts. Have there been any changes made to the wi0 which I should be aware of? Thanks a lot in advance. --=20 Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 10:24:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481A616A420 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:24:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4318B43D64 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:24:47 +0100 id 0003982E.43B1166F.00001D7C Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:24:47 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051227102447.GB7107@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <200512262140.jBQLeE13020313@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512262140.jBQLeE13020313@clunix.cl.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: how to dual boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:24:54 -0000 On 26 Dec Jerry McAllister wrote: > Just put the FreeBSD install CD back in and install the FreeBSD MBR. > It will give you a choice as to which to boot. It works just fine. > It's only quirk is that, if the MS slice is an NTFS type of filesystem > it will identify it as ??? in the menu rather than MS-DOS as it > identifies the FAT type file systems. That weirdness is over in 6.x NTFS partitions are under "Fx DOS" now and I must say I like this much better then "???" -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 11:12:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9DA16A422 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:12:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92DEC43D55 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:12:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 16749 invoked by uid 0); 27 Dec 2005 11:12:53 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 11:12:53 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBRB6Zl9002903; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:06:35 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Message-ID: <43B1203A.3060706@alphaque.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:06:34 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051026 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kiffin Gish References: <000501c60acf$7a678330$2101a8c0@ZGISH> In-Reply-To: <000501c60acf$7a678330$2101a8c0@ZGISH> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless woes: upgrade 5.4 to 6.0, wi0, etc... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:12:57 -0000 On 12/27/05 18:22 Kiffin Gish said the following: > Since I upgraded from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.0, I cannot for the life of me get > the wi0-interface to work at all (real bummer). > > During boot I get the following error message: > > "ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_wep module by hand for now" > > If afterwards I try to fiddle around with ifconfig wepmode on ..., I get the > following error message: > > "ifconfig: SIOCS80211: Operation not permitted" have you tried kldload wlan_wep ? :) -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 11:35:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FB416A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:35:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1770843D5D for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:35:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:22685 helo=XGISH) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ErD6p-000F5k-JU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:35:15 +0000 Message-ID: <000a01c60ada$0b76c840$2401a8c0@XGISH> From: "Kiffin Gish" To: Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:38:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Memory upgrade and resizing the /swap partition ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:35:17 -0000 I just upgraded my laptop from 512MB to 1024MB memory. It is said that the /swap partition has to be at least as much as the = maximum available memory, but my current value is still based on the old = 512MB size. Can I increase the size of the existing swap partition or do I have to = create a new one? If I have to create a new one, how do I do this and = how can I reclaim the unused old swap area? Thanks alot in advance. -------------------------------------------- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 12:08:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99C216A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:08:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BFE43D53 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:08:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-231.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.231]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3884C420; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:16:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87A55285C; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:06:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43B12EAE.4040808@spray.se> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:08:14 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kiffin Gish References: <000a01c60ada$0b76c840$2401a8c0@XGISH> In-Reply-To: <000a01c60ada$0b76c840$2401a8c0@XGISH> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory upgrade and resizing the /swap partition ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:08:14 -0000 Kiffin Gish schrieb: > I just upgraded my laptop from 512MB to 1024MB memory. > > It is said that the /swap partition has to be at least as much as the maximum available memory, [...] This is more an ancient rule of thumb. You can even have a working system without swap at all. Swap will be only used if you have to less memory available and it depends on the main purpose of the computer how much swap you need. For example I have a small server at home that acts as small web server, mail server, file server and many other things; the server has 768 MB RAM and 128 MB swap and ran for the last two years without "out of memory" failures. > Can I increase the size of the existing swap partition or do I have to create a new one? [...] There is another solution: you can use a file that extends your swap partition. # create an empty 256 MB file dd if=/dev/zero of=/usr/swapfile bs=1024k count=256 # add an appropriate line to rc.conf echo 'swapfile="/usr/swapfile"' >> /etc/rc.conf # add swap /etc/rc.d/addswap start 'swapinfo' shows information about your current swap partition and files. Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 12:13:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2015116A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:13:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@xianshi.org) Received: from smtp805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.12.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9AC643D5D for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:13:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@xianshi.org) Received: (qmail 41906 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2005 12:13:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (anita.crosby@btinternet.com@86.137.20.210 with plain) by smtp805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 12:13:17 -0000 Message-ID: <43B12FD5.1030504@xianshi.org> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:13:09 +0000 From: Elliot Crosby-McCullough User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: sysinstall full install remotely with no serial console, possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:13:20 -0000 Hey guys. Basically in my situation I have a broken server in colo with no serial console. It works for the most part but write access to / is gone, and all attempts at repair are not coming about. I'd like to reinstall all but /home (has a seperate slice), however I would have to do so via SSH without the aid of a serial console, and with no CD in the drive. I know sysinstall can run from the OS, and it can install over the network, is it possible to run this full installation remotely in this way, given that it's starting from an installed and configured OS? Thanks, Elliot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 13:07:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EFB16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:07:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net (ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA4F43D68 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:07:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from alpha.home (ppp131-136.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net [59.167.131.136]) by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jBRD79G7042543; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:37:09 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, danial_thom@yahoo.com Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:37:03 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20051224225721.17983.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051224225721.17983.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512272337.03661.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: rod person Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:07:23 -0000 On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:27 am, Danial Thom wrote: > > Schwab Streetsmart > Accounting Software (CA) > Quicken > Photoshop > Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs) > > Those are the ones I use daily. Surely there are > some half-assed alternatives for some of these, > but if I have to use something inferior to use > FreeBSD then thats a point against it. > This is all a question of the applications you need. My game is full custom integrated circuit design and suitable CAD software is available, at a price, on most unix style systems including Solaris, HP-UX, various Linux distributions and FreeBSD. In this field it is the Windows half-assed alternatives that are distinctly inferior. > Also, what you missed, was that I mentioned that > you can be relatively sure that any hardware will > have drivers for windows, while with FreeBSD > you're never quite sure. Its also nice when you > get a new printer or scanner to not have a 3 day > project to get it to work. > For sure Windows has drivers such as the WNT postscript driver that stuffs up scaling calculations for certain target resolutions of the photolithography machines so that art work generated from PCB layout packages is several percent out in size, and is therfore of course useless. It took much more than 3 days to track down the problem and generate a utility to post process the Microsoft postscript output to turn it into something usable. Eventually we discovered the problem was admitted somewhere in the Microsoft Knowledge Base and had been known for sometime without any upgrade or work around offered. Such simple known problems just do not persist in FreeBSD. > The only point I made was that FreeBSD is focused > on server functions and that is justified by the > simple fact that it will never be as useful as > windows; if for no other reason than there simply > aren't the resources for FreeBSD to be a good > server and also a competitive desktop. > The Windows resources are really applied over a rather narrow range of popular applications. Go outside that range and and other systems are more than competitive. Malcolm Kay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 13:35:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC7016A431 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:35:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7775943D45 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:35:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 8520 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2005 13:35:06 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Dec 2005 13:35:06 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 07EA928425; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:35:05 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000a01c60ada$0b76c840$2401a8c0@XGISH> <43B12EAE.4040808@spray.se> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 27 Dec 2005 08:35:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43B12EAE.4040808@spray.se> Message-ID: <44vexaacjb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Memory upgrade and resizing the /swap partition ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:35:19 -0000 =?windows-1252?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= writes: > Kiffin Gish schrieb: > > I just upgraded my laptop from 512MB to 1024MB memory. > > It is said that the /swap partition has to be at least as much as > > the maximum available memory, [...] > > This is more an ancient rule of thumb. You can even have a working > system without swap at all. Swap will be only used if you have to less > memory available and it depends on the main purpose of the computer > how much swap you need. There is one caveat: you can't get a kernel dump unless you have enough non-filesystem disk space (normally your swap partition) to dump it on. This isn't a major issue, though, and you can force the kernel to recognize less memory if you really need to. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 13:35:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06AE16A427 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:35:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038EC43D55 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:35:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from alpha.home (ppp131-136.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net [59.167.131.136]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jBRDZ6br013203; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:05:07 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, danial_thom@yahoo.com Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:05:04 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20051225143322.86896.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051225143322.86896.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512280005.05165.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , Miguel Saturnino , Don Hinton Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:35:21 -0000 On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:03 am, Danial Thom wrote: > --- Giorgos Keramidas > > wrote: > > On 2005-12-24 14:01, Danial Thom > > > > wrote: > > > Don Hinton wrote: > > > > For me, FreeBSD is about twice as fast/easy > > > > to install/configure, > > > > > > and infinitely cheaper. > > > > > > Considering that WinXP usually comes on the > > > > computer, I don't see how > > > > > "installing and configuring FreeBSD" can be > > > > easier than having to do > > > > > nothing at all? > > > > Windows XP comes preinstalled, yes. Not > > "preconfigured" too. It so > > happens that configuring a Windows XP system to > > match one's preferences > > has the potential to: > > > > a) Screw the machine up so completely and > > utterly that a reinstall > > is required. > > b) Take a lot of time. A huge lot of time, > > because of all the > > different 'driver' installation > > processes. I have installed numerous sytems including various versions of MS-DOS and Windows, OS/2, OS/9, Linux distributions and large range of FreeBSD releases. There have been some difficulties from time to time but with one exception these all yielded to study+reason. The one exception was an XP diagnostic build on which I eventually admitted defeat. > > Ate you claiming that someone not familiar with > how to configure FreeBSD can't screw it up beyond > usefulness? I can point you at about 10% of my > customers who've spent weeks just trying to > compile a kernel and get basic networking > working, much less a desktop with X. > I would claim that XP is quite capable of screwing up its system without any real help from the user. I installed a HP all-in-one scanner-plotter on my a NEC laptop running XP professional and this worked fairly well until HP suggested I should update the software. Thereafter some minor annoyances/bugs appeared. I decided that I should go back to the original so I activated the system unistall utility on the HP software. After partly removing the software the utility reported errors; that it could not complete the uninstall. Nor would the original installation rerun because it thought it was already there. So now I don't have access to the all-in-one. Removing all the directories on the machine identified as from HP and registry entries in identified as HP allowed some reintallation to proceed but it is incomplete and doesn't run. I have never experienced this sort of lockout on a FreeBSD system. It is looking as though I will need to do a completely new XP installation -- which I am not looking forward to. It has been said before Windows is OK until something goes wrong; but then it is mostly unfixable. Malcolm Kay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 14:02:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C025D16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:02:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4B043D75 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:02:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jBRE2MiU022893; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:02:22 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jBRE2Mjf022892; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:02:22 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200512271402.jBRE2Mjf022892@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: dick@nagual.st (dick hoogendijk) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:02:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20051227102447.GB7107@lothlorien.nagual.st> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: how to dual boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:02:26 -0000 > > On 26 Dec Jerry McAllister wrote: > > Just put the FreeBSD install CD back in and install the FreeBSD MBR. > > It will give you a choice as to which to boot. It works just fine. > > It's only quirk is that, if the MS slice is an NTFS type of filesystem > > it will identify it as ??? in the menu rather than MS-DOS as it > > identifies the FAT type file systems. > > That weirdness is over in 6.x > NTFS partitions are under "Fx DOS" now and I must say I like this much > better then "???" Ah, good. I haven't had time to install the 6.0 that I downloaded yet. ////jerry > > -- > dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE > ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 14:16:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252B816A484 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:16:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7114C43D68 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:16:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so1286746nzo for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:16:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=XfN8t5PBc0JKXWM8Ti4ve1Ceehn6urdXN5FgBZ0CYaGraNet2TL+/LGTZyS9XJmNuXloh8jHlU7IL1+/+pK1jwXNU7TmWw7H0BakQkDbdV4z7UQ6oX/WmcAdXN5URfMUkhEnOAaqtZb1FSgovUIWozIVd/mN2W0Lf+4DUoanyR4= Received: by 10.36.113.20 with SMTP id l20mr4216723nzc; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:16:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from tu209088.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ( [166.111.209.88]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm7428905nzo.2005.12.27.06.16.15; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:16:18 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:18:54 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512270935.07702.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <20051227013744.GR69668@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20051227013744.GR69668@wantadilla.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512272218.55341.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: projector under FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:16:22 -0000 On Tuesday 27 December 2005 09:37, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 December 2005 at 9:35:07 +0800, Yuan Jue wrote: > > hello, all > > > > can projectors be used under FreeBSD? > > Yes. > > > if it could, how? > > What's the issue? Plug it in and it should work. yes, it does work just when I plug it and it works very well :) -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 14:38:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E09616A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:38:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AF243D4C for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:38:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C879150060 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:38:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27155-01-77 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:37:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8899815005F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:37:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBREbx1I084323 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:37:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:38:01 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <200512280005.05165.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> References: <20051225143322.86896.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200512280005.05165.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051227093503.15A0.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:38:14 -0000 On Tuesday, December 27, 2005 8:35:04 AM Malcolm Kay Subject: Re: BSD Question's. Wrote these words of wisdom: > I would claim that XP is quite capable of screwing up > its system without any real help from the user. > I installed a HP all-in-one scanner-plotter on my > a NEC laptop running XP professional and this worked > fairly well until HP suggested I should update the > software. Thereafter some minor annoyances/bugs appeared. > > I decided that I should go back to the original so I > activated the system unistall utility on the HP software. > After partly removing the software the utility reported > errors; that it could not complete the uninstall. > > Nor would the original installation rerun because it thought > it was already there. > > So now I don't have access to the all-in-one. Removing > all the directories on the machine identified as from HP > and registry entries in identified as HP allowed some > reintallation to proceed but it is incomplete and doesn't > run. > > I have never experienced this sort of lockout on a FreeBSD > system. > > It is looking as though I will need to do a completely new > XP installation -- which I am not looking forward to. > > It has been said before Windows is OK until something goes > wrong; but then it is mostly unfixable. > > Malcolm Kay ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: Get a copy of JV16 Power Tools and run that. Then check the HP site for specific programs that DO totally uninstall their software. HP is notorious for this behavior. Even Symantec on occasion pulls this stunt. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:00:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B273D16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:00:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A46643D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:00:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 6279 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 15:00:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sITB8tjYhX1fJ1Ag5gGYC3m6++YyJL3XXCjDzGNRMeF1phsN33UXmCjDkwXXM8/mpCiT/ZjGPsHfYf0M6vh9q5m+oci+nOofP6DI913WxnnTQsHgpQg+cdZXbTrr0cFzyXg4/smCODElVQ+U/mtuK5RDUAYQWpfqKmCnCgFA0oM= ; Message-ID: <20051227150056.6277.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:00:56 PST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:00:56 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: dick hoogendijk , freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20051227101505.GA7107@lothlorien.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:00:57 -0000 --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 26 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > > > It doesn't really matter what the "accepted" > standard is; its the one > > that *most* people are using. > > Bring this "rule" to society and it won't take > all that much time before > we'll live in a jungle (happely ever after ? > ;-) > > It's the decease of this era that lost of > people find it diffcult to > honor rules except their own. > > I know the saying "money makes the world turn > around" > I disagree. Well if you're going to snip all of the context out then you can't possibly have a credible argument. You might as well go work for a newspaper. __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:05:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B859916A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4212543D5A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 47545 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 15:05:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=V5iyv/pNNcPrMtQ0676WIpPYFTKpaRXPoT4+hj6bod+Q5qqLLQZswbuF4d8QtfIa/HoXmOem3DAh8RtsrAe7gu2y20BPtlwQKBpM/kqrRBnyZBGNoZmRAXaY5adMuGpybQseEUa/Im38sfBzytx157y1JeA5SfTDJaSwG7aP8ak= ; Message-ID: <20051227150556.47543.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:05:56 PST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:05:56 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , "Winelfred G. Pasamba" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: pretenda@wrgn.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:59 -0000 --- Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Danial Thom > [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] > >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:50 AM > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba > >Cc: pretenda@wrgn.net; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL > connections > > > > > > > >As stated, even by Ted, you have to register > ALL > >of your addresses with ALL of your ISPs, so > you > >can send your packets to ANYONE you want, even > if > >they are filtering. > > > > No, what I said is that any ISP that is an > end-node AS > and gets a feed from a network must tell that > network > what IP blocks they are using to send traffic > from. > You're a very sick person, Ted. If you use BGP, both of your providers have to "know" about all of your address blocks. So if they "know" about your address blocks, then you can load balance instead of using BGP. Its the same damn thing, you incompetent blob :) There's little point in being multi-homed if you can't send all of your traffic up EITHER pipe. If you couldn't, you'd be out of business if one of your pipes was down,which simply isn't the case. I really don't know what's wrong with you, except that you seem obsessed with being on the opposite side of whatever arguement I'm one. You're making a goddamned fool of yourself. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:07:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFCD16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:07:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3494243D6A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:07:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:06:55 +0100 id 00039833.43B1588F.0000044C Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:06:55 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051227150654.GA1055@arwen.nagual.st> References: <20051227101505.GA7107@lothlorien.nagual.st> <20051227150056.6277.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051227150056.6277.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:07:05 -0000 On 27 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > > > On 26 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > > > > > It doesn't really matter what the "accepted" standard is; its the > > > one that *most* people are using. > > > > Bring this "rule" to society and it won't take all that much time > > before we'll live in a jungle (happely ever after ? ;-) > > > > It's the decease of this era that lost of people find it diffcult to > > honor rules except their own. > > > > I know the saying "money makes the world turn around" > > I disagree. > > Well if you're going to snip all of the context out then you can't > possibly have a credible argument. You might as well go work for a > newspaper. I think my argument stands. The context is in the threat (as you well know, because it's been written by you). Furthermore you don't seem to think highly of people working for newspapers. Personally I don't look down on people, no matter their work nor social status. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 ++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:18:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA6716A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:18:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay106-f1.bay106.hotmail.com [65.54.161.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AAC43D5F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:18:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:18:57 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:18:56 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.68.247.73] X-Originating-Email: [antennex@hotmail.com] X-Sender: antennex@hotmail.com From: "Jack Stone" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:18:56 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Dec 2005 15:18:57.0139 (UTC) FILETIME=[DB243C30:01C60AF8] Subject: a SED need X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:18:57 -0000 I have some HTML files with hundreds of URLs that I need to modify using a search/replace string. I assume that SED(1) is the right tool to use, but every syntax I've tried has not worked. Here is what I'm trying to do: Change full URLs to relative paths, in other words, chop off the "http://www.example.com/" portion: >From this:
  • To this:
  • I think it is the slashes and quotes that are giving me fits as I'm very much a novice on SED(1) syntax. Would appreciate any tips on how to do the above so I can search and replace all of the hundreds of URLs. Many thanks and Happy New Year! Regards, Jack _________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:31:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0636916A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:31:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lloyd.peterson@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA6A43D77 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:31:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lloyd.peterson@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so862105wxc for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:31:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Mn1umE8kq1gQHozuwEHozQiAf6lO4eHlRntYbImbVQriQXbxUDonTuwmqVqfdBVUcJOC1vwHLwOIfLmqcRwXOGAorOpFHTx6GxjhkM72DHRLdZPesYk5EdmaB1ClQTNIyy+CvPW5HcDyjdr9YLSBMlJCRcwMZVDZ6nFbsHtr9f4= Received: by 10.70.116.3 with SMTP id o3mr381867wxc; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:31:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.62.15 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:31:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <95550eab0512270731v31303cfbw9889f0e311872a5c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:31:54 -0500 From: Aaron Peterson To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: pf, pfil hooks and if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:31:58 -0000 I was reading about the new if_bridge driver, and the ability of any packet filter to interface with it that uses pfil hooks. But I can't seem to find any documentation that says whether pf is such a packet filter? Would someone enlighten me if pf is useable with the new if_bridge driver? Thanks, Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:33:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B9116A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:33:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsidorov@swsoft.com) Received: from master.plesk.ru (plesk-gw.Nsk.gldn.net [194.67.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F006843D5E for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:33:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsidorov@swsoft.com) Received: from sidorov.plesk.ru (sidorov.plesk.ru [192.168.43.59]) by master.plesk.ru (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBRFXYMp003721; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:33:34 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from dsidorov@swsoft.com) From: Dmitry Sidorov To: Jack Stone In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: SWsoft Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:32:49 +0600 Message-Id: <1135697569.835.4.camel@sidorov.plesk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on master.plesk.ru host X-Antivirus-Code: 100000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a SED need X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dsidorov@swsoft.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:33:39 -0000 On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 09:18 -0600, Jack Stone wrote: > I have some HTML files with hundreds of URLs that I need to modify using a > search/replace string. I assume that SED(1) is the right tool to use, but > every syntax I've tried has not worked. > > Here is what I'm trying to do: > Change full URLs to relative paths, in other words, chop off the > "http://www.example.com/" portion: > > >From this: >
  • > To this: >
  • > > I think it is the slashes and quotes that are giving me fits as I'm very > much a novice on SED(1) syntax. > > Would appreciate any tips on how to do the above so I can search and replace > all of the hundreds of URLs. > > Many thanks and Happy New Year! > > Regards, > Jack > > _________________________________________________________________ > Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! > http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Try this: sed s/http:\\/\\/www.example.com// your_file -- Dmitry Sidorov PEM QA Engineer SWsoft, Inc. E-mail: dsidorov@swsoft.com ICQ UIN: 864582 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:45:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D4816A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:45:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48D4C43D5E for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:45:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 52975 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 15:45:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wNPqhH/j1xocSB2bsiHa7Gd1N4y0tYawG/GUhMSncYzLqKz1qIAhkS324vixQMFDY2juG+x/YzyMxJBC28C2s+uHTXjgMRgCi5eobmu3hZKVLXLoqbr5eYJhwHG1a6oEcWfzYUPIcN6kfepJPkLaomJ2FQgYvtRATaKdF+tm6YY= ; Message-ID: <20051227154529.52973.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:45:29 PST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:45:29 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Malcolm Kay , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200512272337.03661.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: rod person Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:45:31 -0000 --- Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:27 am, Danial Thom > wrote: > > > > Schwab Streetsmart > > Accounting Software (CA) > > Quicken > > Photoshop > > Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs) > > > > Those are the ones I use daily. Surely there > are > > some half-assed alternatives for some of > these, > > but if I have to use something inferior to > use > > FreeBSD then thats a point against it. > > > > This is all a question of the applications you > need. > My game is full custom integrated circuit > design and > suitable CAD software is available, at a price, > on > most unix style systems including Solaris, > HP-UX, > various Linux distributions and FreeBSD. In > this > field it is the Windows half-assed alternatives > that are distinctly inferior. No, its a point of applications that one would reasonably need to run a business. I can't run a business from your CAD workstation. I can't live without accounting software. I would hardly call apps such as Cadence "half-assed", even if you prefer something else. In fact, Candence runs on Windows, Linux and Solaris but NOT FreeBSD, and its by far the most used product the market in that genre. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:53:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD04716A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:53:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A17743D55 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:53:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 66673 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 15:53:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wKDi9twzehD2hNbDPvCpdvyFBjC5zPqfofvJbEiyaezMYJB+zkfm0vKDic2668QfxEv4E8FiB0FjH7LHfwPHzsl+1ahJSd6m+M0ZsSUGEjKHUC8U96lQd3QPyGi/veqNQfynT6PrHQvKg03gq2H/yjrS7cDRjI0bMBIMjo42y0c= ; Message-ID: <20051227155311.66671.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:53:11 PST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:53:11 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: dick hoogendijk , freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20051227150654.GA1055@arwen.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:53:12 -0000 --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 27 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > > --- dick hoogendijk wrote: > > > > > On 26 Dec Danial Thom wrote: > > > > > > > It doesn't really matter what the > "accepted" standard is; its the > > > > one that *most* people are using. > > > > > > Bring this "rule" to society and it won't > take all that much time > > > before we'll live in a jungle (happely ever > after ? ;-) > > > > > > It's the decease of this era that lost of > people find it diffcult to > > > honor rules except their own. > > > > > > I know the saying "money makes the world > turn around" > > > I disagree. > > > > Well if you're going to snip all of the > context out then you can't > > possibly have a credible argument. You might > as well go work for a > > newspaper. > > I think my argument stands. The context is in > the threat (as you well > know, because it's been written by you). I think you mean "thread" here? I didn't start the thread. But you can't ignore reality. Reality is that most people use IE. So if you ignore that fact, then you are not good at your job of designing websites, because it is a key factor. They don't make seats in busses 3' wide because some people are really fat. They make them so that the majority of people can fit comfortably in them (well, reasonably comfortably anyway). If you worry about every case, then you cheat the majority, and your product is less useful. > > Furthermore you don't seem to think highly of > people working for > newspapers. > Personally I don't look down on people, no > matter their work nor social > status. My point is that newspapers are spinsters, as they often take a word or phrase out of context to make a story fit their agenda. It has nothing to do with the status of the people who work there, only their ethics and motivations, which are to make things appear the way they think will generate the most interest; not the truth. DT __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 16:00:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF94016A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:00:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DC3A43D67 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:00:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 58586 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 16:00:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hBUQXyueAhLC+ahtElyax8Pvh5aF2/IoFfTl2+Dqv7Zc/e3hjN6zUHjIgMG2SqmiKRieRtbbSWrxHmtsGqL9dwKLFi+SERzV/gKsXO7GPkw3JQXrBG3soozDkWCPScVLohqo3FAbCZ4JJ8nAKov08mPBgZqSmMTiPLIodqUWGZs= ; Message-ID: <20051227160015.58584.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:00:15 PST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:00:15 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , "Winelfred G. Pasamba" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Loren M. Lang" , Yance Kowara , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:00:18 -0000 --- Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Does it meet the test I already outlined? > > Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a > remote server, > with both lines connected. Time it. > > Disconnect 1 line, then repeat the test. If > the time to > download and upload when both DSL lines are > connected is > half the time it takes when 1 DSL line is > connected, then > your load-balancing. > > If not, then you are not - although if it makes > you feel > like you haven't wasted your money claim your > "per session load balancing" then I suppose it > would be > uncharitable to make you feel bad by pointing > out that > this is purely a marketing term with no > networking > significance. > > Oops. > > Ted Ted seems incapable of grasping how things work, so I don't recommend wasting your time on anything he says. As I stated, you cannot control how traffic comes into your network, so Ted's little download test is sure not to work. Traffic is routed to whichever ISP has the best route. You can only control how traffic goes OUT of your network. So load-balancing can only increase your upload speeds, not your download speeds. If you are hosting this is useful. If you have mostly download traffic, then its probably not worth is. I don't know if Ted is trying to boondoggle you into thinking his view is correct, or he just doesn't understand it. I suspect its a bit of both. You should really try the freebsd-isp list, as there are at least some people on there that have a clue. Although even Ted's resume looks good on paper, so you really can't tell. Incompetence is widespread. DT __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 16:04:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C486316A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:04:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B90B443D76 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:04:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 4990 invoked by uid 0); 27 Dec 2005 16:04:45 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (69.73.60.132) by smtp6.knology.net with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 16:04:45 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 9416A613D; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:04:45 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:04:45 -0600 From: David Kelly To: Jack Stone Message-ID: <20051227160445.GA56368@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a SED need X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:04:58 -0000 On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 09:18:56AM -0600, Jack Stone wrote: > I have some HTML files with hundreds of URLs that I need to modify using a > search/replace string. I assume that SED(1) is the right tool to use, but > every syntax I've tried has not worked. > > Here is what I'm trying to do: > Change full URLs to relative paths, in other words, chop off the > "http://www.example.com/" portion: > > >From this: >
  • > To this: >
  • > > I think it is the slashes and quotes that are giving me fits as I'm very > much a novice on SED(1) syntax. Am sure sed is the right high power production tool for getting the job done but I get such things done easier in awk. Am sure many say the same about perl. Sed, awk, perl, is the evolutionary order. Save this as something like "example.awk" and chmod +x to make it executable for easy reuse. Or you could "awk -f example.exe input > output" By saving to a file you bypass the need to escape characters from the shell (which will be different depending on csh vs. sh) and yet again from the RE parser. The escapes below are to make sure the literal character is used for regular expression rather than a possible RE interpretation. Contains two patterns to match. The first matches the thing you are looking to change. The match regular expression is repeated in gsub() where its replaced with the plain text you desire. "Print" causes the line to be outputed, and "next" ends the processing of that input line so the next pattern isn't tried. Therefore the next match-all pattern prints everything the first skipped. #!/usr/bin/awk -f / X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5441016A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgoldberg@tarshis.com) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF9E43D78 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgoldberg@tarshis.com) Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (pimout3-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.218]) by ylpvm29.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBRGF0ri006255 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:15:00 -0500 X-ORBL: [69.211.107.116] Received: from storyopom7s0ow (adsl-69-211-107-116.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [69.211.107.116]) by pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBRGErmv132566 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:14:58 -0500 From: "Daniel Goldberg" To: Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:13:30 -0600 Message-ID: <001301c60b00$7d3fb330$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:25 -0000 Dear FreeBSD- I'm a FreeBSD 6.0 newbie and very excited. Could you please by any chance answer the following basic install Question? What is the order of installing FreeBSD for a dual-boot XP environment on a single HDD using GAG (ie, which do I install first, which partition for each os, is there a resource for this answer published somewhere anyway???) Thank you, Daniel Goldberg Daniel Franklin Goldberg IT | Post-Production Systems Engineer Avid ACSR (Unity/Windows) Apple ACHDS Microsoft MCP Cisco CCNA email Dgoldberg@Tarshis.com mobile 847.400.7949 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 16:15:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7E016A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from outmx006.isp.belgacom.be (outmx006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.4.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAA043D5D for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from outmx006.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx006.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id jBRGFGuG009687 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:15:17 +0100 (envelope-from ) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (251-33.245.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.245.33.251]) by outmx006.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id jBRGFBwK009633; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:15:11 +0100 (envelope-from ) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBRGFD7v039042; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:15:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: Jon Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:15:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051227052819.85949.qmail@web36114.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051227052819.85949.qmail@web36114.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512271715.11028.tijl@ulyssis.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3D Hardware Graphics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:32 -0000 On Tuesday 27 December 2005 06:28, Jon wrote: > I'm wondering how to get 3D Hardware graphics going > under FreeBSD. > I tried both the LibGL.so that came with the driver > for my graphics card and the default LibGL.so that > came with FreeBSD '/usr/X11R6/lib' but no go, still > slow software mode. I have a DRI radeon enabled driver > and a radeon driver for xorg.conf, AGP was built into > my kernel. What else can I try to get this going? > > FreeBSD 6.0 STABLE - ATI Radeon 9800 Pro As far as I understand things, support for that card is still experimental, so make sure you have recent versions of 6.0-stable, x11-servers/xorg-server-snap and graphics/dri-devel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 16:37:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC40F16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:37:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0969343D4C for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:37:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 41896 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2005 16:37:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pSzJy03Y73pXdVXog2MRgUszFVvRsNISy/Hip8Fw7zHsWTXc47E9pURuaf1DrEUALtH0spMDZ/OmoXljfY6h9HEikfGVn9UUsWdB/rXAX4+9JrDkXZveJl8fQzQLHb0pnWJJTMyu9zDBRtcG5cJGTYgvEMmgi2jx8P98MA5GMHo= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 16:37:13 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Jack Stone In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:37:11 -0500 Message-Id: <1135701431.2658.25.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a SED need X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:37:15 -0000 On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 09:18 -0600, Jack Stone wrote: > I have some HTML files with hundreds of URLs that I need to modify using a > search/replace string. I assume that SED(1) is the right tool to use, but > every syntax I've tried has not worked. > > Here is what I'm trying to do: > Change full URLs to relative paths, in other words, chop off the > "http://www.example.com/" portion: > > >From this: >
  • > To this: >
  • > > I think it is the slashes and quotes that are giving me fits as I'm very > much a novice on SED(1) syntax. > > Would appreciate any tips on how to do the above so I can search and replace > all of the hundreds of URLs. > > Many thanks and Happy New Year! > > Regards, > Jack > > _________________________________________________________________ > Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! > http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" sed will allow other characters than '/' as its delimiter, which makes it much easier to get escape sequences right, or avoid them altogether. sed -e 's=/http=/https=g' is an example From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 16:38:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC4F16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:38:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACC043D5E for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:38:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1ErHqg-0004mb-D6; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:38:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:39:04 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: "Daniel Goldberg" Message-ID: <20051227103904.6cb83f0e@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: <001301c60b00$7d3fb330$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> References: <001301c60b00$7d3fb330$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc04d132e63b042ce765191ee19c03ce6f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:38:56 -0000 On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:13:30 -0600 "Daniel Goldberg" wrote: > Dear FreeBSD- > > I'm a FreeBSD 6.0 newbie and very excited. > > Could you please by any chance answer the following basic install > Question? > > > What is the order of installing FreeBSD for a dual-boot XP environment > on a single HDD using GAG > (ie, which do I install first, which partition for each os, is there a > resource for this answer published somewhere anyway???) > > Thank you, > > Daniel Goldberg > > Daniel Franklin Goldberg > 1. Install Windows first, in the first partition. If you want FreeBSD to be able to write to the Windows partition, use the fat32 format instead of NTFS. Do NOT create this partition to use the entire disk as the FreeBSD installation does not include tools to resize the existing Windows partition. 2. See more documentation regarding FreeBSD installation at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 16:58:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419D916A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:58:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@att.net) Received: from mail1.utrs.com (mail1.utrs.com [146.145.216.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF57243D5E for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:58:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@att.net) Received: from [10.10.10.1] [216.113.237.29] by mail1.utrs.com with ESMTP (SMTPD-9.00) id A2A102D0; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:58:09 -0500 Message-ID: <43B17298.5070708@att.net> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:58:00 -0500 From: DW User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051223) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43AC309F.7000608@att.net> <20051223205231.GC2950@osiris.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20051223205231.GC2950@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Palm (Zire) and /dev/ucom0 on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:58:08 -0000 Jonathan Chen wrote: >On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:15:11PM -0500, DW wrote: > >[...] > > >>I do all this on my new 6.0 machine. When I hit the sync button on zire, >>I get the expected dmesg output (detecting the palm device), but there >>is no /dev/ucom0 device in /dev. Why? >> >> > >Aside from adding uvisor, you don't have to change any other >configuration files for 6.0; the USB tty support files have changed >from /dev/ucom* in 5.0 to /dev/cuaU* in 6+. > >Cheers. > > Thanks. I tried this, but am still having no luck syncing either through Jpilot interface or directly at console using pilot-xfer. When I hit the hotsync button on my Zire, I get: ucom0: PalmOne, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 ucom0: PalmOne, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.10, addr 2 I then type: # pilot-xfer -p /dev/cuaU0 -b backup and I get: Listening to port: /dev/cuaU0 Please press teh HotSync button now.... then *nothing* either I cancel on my zire, or it times out, and my dmesg output: ucom0: ucomreadcb: IOERROR ucom0: at uhub1 port2 (addr 2) disconnected All threads purged from cuaU0 All threads purged from ttyU0 ucom0: detached Of cource if I try to "pilot-xfer" the same command above *before* hitting hotsync on the zire, I get: The device /dev/cuaU0 does not exist.. Possible solution: mkdnod /dev/cuaU0 c Unable to bind to port: /dev/cuaU0 I'm doing all of this as *root* right now, just to get this working before I tackle the usual permissions issues that crop up when I do this as my regular user. For laughs and giggles, I also tried all of this with /dev/ttyU0 as well, but it doesn't seem to make any difference. Thanks for any help. -DW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 17:06:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7119716A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:06:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (fed1rmmtao06.cox.net [68.230.241.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5774643D45 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:06:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from workdog ([68.228.71.3]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051227170346.BAFW20050.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@workdog>; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:03:46 -0500 From: "Gayn Winters" To: "'Daniel Goldberg'" , Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:05:57 -0800 Organization: Bristol Systems Inc. Message-ID: <003c01c60b07$d0f6ce30$6501a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 In-Reply-To: <001301c60b00$7d3fb330$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:06:06 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Daniel Goldberg > Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 8:14 AM > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Quick Install Question > > > Dear FreeBSD- > > I'm a FreeBSD 6.0 newbie and very excited. > > Could you please by any chance answer the following basic install > Question? > > > What is the order of installing FreeBSD for a dual-boot XP environment > on a single HDD using GAG > (ie, which do I install first, which partition for each os, is there a > resource for this answer published somewhere anyway???) Welcome to FreeBSD! By all means read the Handbook before going any further. Also, the FAQ's (both on freebsd.org) are very helpful to newbies. One very nice thing about FreeBSD is the huge number of resources available on the web. Google for them. The quick answer to your question is install XP first, then FreeBSD. The reason is that Windows is very impolite relative to coexisting with other OS's, and it overwrites the MBR! -gayn Bristol Systems Inc. 714/532-6776 www.bristolsystems.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 17:10:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056D716A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:10:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin@gish.demon.nl) Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996ED43D69 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:10:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin@gish.demon.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:28998 helo=XGISH) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ErILP-0004v6-VV; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:10:40 +0000 Message-ID: <001901c60b08$e6ed40b0$2401a8c0@XGISH> From: "Kiffin Gish" To: "Dinesh Nair" References: <000501c60acf$7a678330$2101a8c0@ZGISH> <43B1203A.3060706@alphaque.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:13:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless woes: upgrade 5.4 to 6.0, wi0, etc... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:10:43 -0000 Yes I have. I also added it to the loader.conf file, the kernel configuration file, done a buildkernel etc. but no luck. # /boot/loader.conf wlan_wep_load="YES" # /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC device wlan_wep But still no luck. What am I forgetting? -------------------------------------------- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dinesh Nair" To: "Kiffin Gish" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:06 Subject: Re: Wireless woes: upgrade 5.4 to 6.0, wi0, etc... > > > On 12/27/05 18:22 Kiffin Gish said the following: >> Since I upgraded from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.0, I cannot for the life of me get >> the wi0-interface to work at all (real bummer). >> >> During boot I get the following error message: >> >> "ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_wep module by hand for now" >> >> If afterwards I try to fiddle around with ifconfig wepmode on ..., I get >> the >> following error message: >> >> "ifconfig: SIOCS80211: Operation not permitted" > > have you tried kldload wlan_wep ? :) > > -- > Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." > dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ > +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ > | for a in past present future; do > | > | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do > | > | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." > | > | done; done > | > +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 17:58:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E9216A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:58:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dr2867@pacbell.net) Received: from smtp109.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp109.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C826743D5F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:58:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dr2867@pacbell.net) Received: (qmail 90085 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2005 17:58:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (dr2867.business@pacbell.net@68.126.236.234 with plain) by smtp109.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 17:58:53 -0000 Message-ID: <43B180F3.9040805@pacbell.net> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:59:15 -0800 From: Daniel Rudy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11R6; UNIX; FreeBSD/i386 6.0-RELEASE; en-US; ja-JP; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 MultiZilla/1.6.2.0c Mnenhy/0.7.2.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051226164848.0F9A416A429@hub.freebsd.org> <43514.127.0.0.1.1135647945.squirrel@www.apriori.net> In-Reply-To: <43514.127.0.0.1.1135647945.squirrel@www.apriori.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: That Drive Geometry Bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:58:56 -0000 At about the time of 12/26/2005 5:45 PM, nospam@apriori.net stated the following: > I am trying to back up the drive I have been using (which is now full) > onto a 60GB Seagate IDE drive - ST360020A. After a bunch of failures at > configuring the disk, I did some searching on the web and found some info > on the "drive geometry bug". > > I followed the directions I found there - essentially, go into my BIOS at > boot time, write down the drive geometry that the BIOS thinks I have and > then plug those numbers into FreeBSD fdisk at the beginning of > installation. > > What happened: > 1. FreeBSD complained that the drive geometry it was seeing was wrong, and > was using its own best guess: 7297/255/63. > 2. I hit "G" and edited the C/H/S to that which the BIOS reported: > 28733/16/255. > 3. I hit Enter; the installer said `Nope, you're wrong! I'm going to use > my best guess instead!' > > No matter how many times I try to enter the info, it changes it back to > whatever it thinks is more correct. > > I tried switching the head and sector info (trying 28733/255/16). but no joy. > > Is there a way to coax the installer into cooperating? > > Thanks - > -- paz. I just recently ran into this problem myself. Just use FreeBSD's best guess and it will work fine. If you set the BIOS to LBA mode, you will find that matches FreeBSD's best guess. -- Daniel Rudy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:20:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769A916A422 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:20:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awebster@connectalk.com) Received: from esafe.connectalk.com (esafe.connectalk.com [204.19.165.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06E5343D88 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:20:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awebster@connectalk.com) Received: from connectalk.com ([10.125.204.14]) by eSafe SMTP Relay 1133537594; Tue Dec 27 13:18:09 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:20:38 -0500 Message-ID: <9D61D69E3C1F7F459C5513AD830EE2194753EE@mtlex01.connectalk.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: sysinstall full install remotely with no serial console, possible? Thread-Index: AcYK3whnL92RUUNpQYuXFIsoKS34eQAMyVrg From: "Webster, Andrew" To: "Elliot Crosby-McCullough" , X-ESAFE-STATUS: Mail clean X-ESAFE-DETAILS: Clean Cc: Subject: RE: sysinstall full install remotely with no serial console, possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:20:48 -0000 You might want to check out ethercons, but you'll probably have to roll your own boot CD with this included. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Elliot Crosby-McCullough Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 07:13 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: sysinstall full install remotely with no serial console, possible? Hey guys. Basically in my situation I have a broken server in colo with no serial=20 console. It works for the most part but write access to / is gone, and=20 all attempts at repair are not coming about. I'd like to reinstall all but /home (has a seperate slice), however I=20 would have to do so via SSH without the aid of a serial console, and=20 with no CD in the drive. I know sysinstall can run from the OS, and it can install over the=20 network, is it possible to run this full installation remotely in this=20 way, given that it's starting from an installed and configured OS? Thanks, Elliot _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" *************************************************************************= ************************* The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager= or the=20 sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make cop= ies. ** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content. *= * *************************************************************************= ************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:21:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350FD16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:21:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86EA43D7B for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:21:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0AF210168 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:21:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15914-01-32 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:21:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8852921016A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:21:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBRILOca084980 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:21:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:21:26 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20051227103904.6cb83f0e@grokwell.org> References: <001301c60b00$7d3fb330$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> <20051227103904.6cb83f0e@grokwell.org> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051227131407.BA44.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:21:46 -0000 On Tuesday, December 27, 2005 11:39:04 AM "Andrew L. Gould" Subject: Re: Quick Install Question Wrote these words of wisdom: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:13:30 -0600 > "Daniel Goldberg" wrote: > > > Dear FreeBSD- [..] > > 1. Install Windows first, in the first partition. If you want FreeBSD > to be able to write to the Windows partition, use the fat32 format > instead of NTFS. Do NOT create this partition to use the entire disk > as the FreeBSD installation does not include tools to resize the > existing Windows partition. > > 2. See more documentation regarding FreeBSD installation at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html > > Best of luck, > > Andrew Gould ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: Perhaps I am missing something here, but I have WinXP installed on one of my computers. The HD is formatted with NTFS, not fat32. Using Samba, i can both read and write to this disk. Maybe I am missing something from the original posters message. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net As long as war is regarded as wicked, it will always have its fascination. When it is looked upon as vulgar, it will cease to be popular. Oscar Wilde From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:22:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CFD16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:22:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shantanoo@ghar.dhoomketu.net.in) Received: from iqara.net (sendmail.iqara.net [203.187.192.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B5843D70 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shantanoo@ghar.dhoomketu.net.in) Received: (qmail 1538 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2005 18:12:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ghar.dhoomketu.net.in) ([219.91.153.219]) (envelope-sender ) by iqara.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Dec 2005 18:12:18 -0000 Received: by ghar.dhoomketu.net.in (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A0DADC57F; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:36:12 +0530 (IST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:36:12 +0530 From: Shantanoo Mahajan To: scuba@centroin.com.br Message-ID: <20051226200612.GA3098@ghar.dhoomketu.net.in> Mail-Followup-To: scuba@centroin.com.br, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051226160337.D54299@trex.centroin.com.br> <200512261311.58919.nb_root@videotron.ca> <20051226161417.G54299@trex.centroin.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051226161417.G54299@trex.centroin.com.br> Organization: Hmmm... I dunno X-OS: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE i386 X-UPTIME: 1:34AM up 3:25, 0 users, load averages: 0.11, 0.16, 0.21 X-Mailer-Website: http://www.mutt.org X-GPG-Fingerprint: 614C 591B D401 98ED 1EF1 8BCF 30A1 5685 07A6 AA4B User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r535 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DVD burning GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:22:30 -0000 --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +++ scuba@centroin.com.br [freebsd] [26-12-05 16:15 -0200]: | Hi Nicolas, |=20 | I forget to say that I'm using Gnome, does k3b work with it? Yes. KDE libraries will be installed. --=20 --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDsE0zMKFWhQemqksRAoiHAJ9+UG1Kv59Ps1fD75ZhtLyIhp2HlwCdHhSK DEO8E9QW9qlnK03gF8caWns= =Kmsy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:23:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6821316A420 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:23:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4542043D69 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:23:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 18688 invoked by uid 89); 28 Dec 2005 05:23:07 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 18664, pid: 18674, t: 1.1280s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (213.202.161.5) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2005 05:23:06 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd From: eoghan Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:23:04 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:23:21 -0000 Hello Im wondering how to tell freeBSD about my 2 dvd drives. k3b automatically detects them but it hasnt found either. Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:27:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878BC16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:27:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from mdhost1.centroin.com.br (mail-gw1.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF02B43D49 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:27:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from trex.centroin.com.br (trex.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.134]) by mdhost1.centroin.com.br (8.13.5/8.13.5/CIP SMTP HOST) with ESMTP id jBRIRQ0x094040 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:27:26 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:27:48 -0200 (BRST) From: scuba@centroin.com.br Sender: mpsouza@trex.centroin.com.br To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051227162415.T1312@trex.centroin.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Hits: 0.007 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 200.225.63.205 Subject: Missing lib X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:27:30 -0000 Hi all, My system (FBSD 5.4, Xorg, Gnome2), started to show the following message. /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libexif.so.10" not found, required by "nautilus" I indeed, could not find libexif.so.10. How can I fix that? - Thank you From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:38:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3672416A446 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:38:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69F5743DD0 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:38:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 44293 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 18:38:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FutGnVLjNIh20Wr3CQkt19h21x8HV9UpWTCNew6sFh/IMSsjBDASLHdWZcxLeR0wkHgA5kX3kHAXND64pIfbmnUk03kFkzpSwpEmoubGbZhIvS+R2Teh3r/JcZR+Ie4cUCu7IdqipzmOxkYi51neuSouogjn4XlhkYmMsgs+pD8= ; Message-ID: <20051227183826.44291.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:38:26 PST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:38:26 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , "Winelfred G. Pasamba" In-Reply-To: <20051227160015.58584.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Loren M. Lang" , Yance Kowara , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:38:59 -0000 --- Danial Thom wrote: > > > --- Ted Mittelstaedt > wrote: > > > > > Does it meet the test I already outlined? > > > > Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a > > remote server, > > with both lines connected. Time it. > > > > Disconnect 1 line, then repeat the test. If > > the time to > > download and upload when both DSL lines are > > connected is > > half the time it takes when 1 DSL line is > > connected, then > > your load-balancing. > > > > If not, then you are not - although if it > makes > > you feel > > like you haven't wasted your money claim your > > "per session load balancing" then I suppose > it > > would be > > uncharitable to make you feel bad by pointing > > out that > > this is purely a marketing term with no > > networking > > significance. > > > > Oops. > > > > Ted > > > Ted seems incapable of grasping how things > work, > so I don't recommend wasting your time on > anything he says. > > As I stated, you cannot control how traffic > comes > into your network, so Ted's little download > test > is sure not to work. Traffic is routed to > whichever ISP has the best route. You can only > control how traffic goes OUT of your network. > So > load-balancing can only increase your upload > speeds, not your download speeds. If you are > hosting this is useful. If you have mostly > download traffic, then its probably not worth > is. > > I don't know if Ted is trying to boondoggle you > into thinking his view is correct, or he just > doesn't understand it. I suspect its a bit of > both. > > You should really try the freebsd-isp list, as > there are at least some people on there that > have > a clue. Although even Ted's resume looks good > on > paper, so you really can't tell. Incompetence > is > widespread. > > DT To sooth the nerves of the OP, the truth about this is that it might work and it might not. Ted's assertion that all ISPs do ingress address filtering is simply wrong. Not even close. My assumption that none do isn't right either. IF when one of your lines goes down you are still online then you can load-balance outbound. IF you are multi-homed or have a working backup scenario, then you can load balance outbound. There is much discussion on the trade-offs of ingress address filtering, and many believe its the old "cut off your nose to spite your face". It reduces the cpu power of your router by causing it to test every packet coming in, it makes multi-homing not work, and it makes changing addresses on a large network extremely more difficult, in order to thwart an unlikely event. I recommend that my customers isolate co-location customers so when worms hit they can find the problem easier. Few do because its easier to have everyone on the same wire. My cable company, for example, changes their networking scheme every few months, and if they had to change ingress filters on 100s of routers manually it would be ridiculously difficult to do. So they don't address filter. Ted is somehow in denial that 100s of people load balance to different destinations. Since he doesn't know the terms (such as round-robin, etc) you can be sure he's never done any of it. The simple truth is that you have to try things. You never know what your upstream is doing. DSL is a strange animal that requires muxes in often very complicated meshes. If you can move your default router to your "other" router then you are likely not filtered. There are many issues more important than address-spoofing, such as stability and performance. I have customers that are so disorganized that they can't isolate any known address group to any specific router, and others that require that you register your MAC address with them or nothing will work at all. You can't postulate what your situation is. You have to do testing and figure out what you can and can't do. The more you know about how things REALLY work, the more innovative you can be in your implementation. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:42:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B3316A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FF243D53 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:42:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1ErJmV-0005zx-Ns; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:42:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:42:54 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051227124254.6e3d2301@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: <20051227131407.BA44.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <001301c60b00$7d3fb330$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> <20051227103904.6cb83f0e@grokwell.org> <20051227131407.BA44.GERARD@seibercom.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bceb6bc46a973b5b0986d136fa4a078aa5350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: Subject: Re: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:42:45 -0000 On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:21:26 -0500 Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Tuesday, December 27, 2005 11:39:04 AM > "Andrew L. Gould" > Subject: Re: Quick Install Question > Wrote these words of wisdom: > > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:13:30 -0600 > > "Daniel Goldberg" wrote: > > > > > Dear FreeBSD- > [..] > > > > 1. Install Windows first, in the first partition. If you want > > FreeBSD to be able to write to the Windows partition, use the fat32 > > format instead of NTFS. Do NOT create this partition to use the > > entire disk as the FreeBSD installation does not include tools to > > resize the existing Windows partition. > > > > 2. See more documentation regarding FreeBSD installation at: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html > > > > Best of luck, > > > > Andrew Gould > > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** > On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: > > Perhaps I am missing something here, but I have WinXP installed on one > of my computers. The HD is formatted with NTFS, not fat32. Using > Samba, i can both read and write to this disk. > > Maybe I am missing something from the original posters message. > > -- > Gerard Seibert > gerard@seibercom.net > Is the WinXP partition in the same computer that is running FreeBSD? Or is the NTFS partition a shared directory on a separate WinXP computer? (I was not aware that Samba could be used to read NTFS partitions residing on a FreeBSD computer.) The original poster wishes to dual boot WinXP and FreeBSD on the same computer. Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:46:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930C916A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:46:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from europa100@comcast.net) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C48543D5C for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:46:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from europa100@comcast.net) Received: from lm741n.dyndns.org ([24.20.8.31]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with SMTP id <20051227184628014008j2sve>; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:46:28 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:46:23 -0800 From: Rob To: freebsd Message-Id: <20051227104623.14783549.europa100@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.6.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Firefox 1.5 complains that it is already running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:46:32 -0000 Hi, I compiled Firefox 1.5 from ports but when attempting to start it I get the error message: "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system." I could not find any Firefox or Mozilla type of process running. I am starting it from a terminal and I get no error messages there. Ending Xorg and then starting it again does not help. Finally Firefox was compiled with -o -pipe -mtune=pentium4, so I doubt if there would be any problem with the build. Thank you. Rob Lytle ps. Mozilla runs OK, but I had to turn off java and javascript, and also block pop-up windows in order to stop the occasional 100% cpu usage and zombie processes. -- ------------------ http://home.comcast.net/~europa100 Rob Lytle Home Page From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:51:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F14A16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:51:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lloyd.peterson@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889F143D60 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lloyd.peterson@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so882771wxc for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:50:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=paPDYgG5jRH5dskYDExFZCzqDNN1/ETt/0ytwrBwvC84+ZWAMhALp/fN9C9OvGElTuzlf7wbL3SNpoFoqnsZX2nveujLTViP8yNJvOwZFvk8jCEq64taWd4yJ0zVGoePMGdcbOEYJ2TSviz7rHGAakPDkmD+5FM7hyFLIovHsQs= Received: by 10.70.129.5 with SMTP id b5mr7184177wxd; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:50:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.62.15 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:50:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <95550eab0512271050r2c2848f7u565d51ccc6d90cf9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:50:58 -0500 From: Aaron Peterson To: Rob In-Reply-To: <20051227104623.14783549.europa100@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051227104623.14783549.europa100@comcast.net> Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: Firefox 1.5 complains that it is already running X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:51:00 -0000 On 12/27/05, Rob wrote: > Hi, > > I compiled Firefox 1.5 from ports but when attempting to start it I get > the error message: > > "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new > window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart > your system." > > I could not find any Firefox or Mozilla type of process running. > I am starting it from a terminal and I get no error messages there. > Ending Xorg and then starting it again does not help. > > Finally Firefox was compiled with -o -pipe -mtune=3Dpentium4, so I doubt > if there would be any problem with the build. > > Thank you. > > Rob Lytle > > ps. Mozilla runs OK, but I had to turn off java and javascript, and > also block pop-up windows in order to stop the occasional 100% cpu > usage and zombie processes. There is probably a file named "lock" somewhere under the .mozilla directory in you home directory. Usually these are left behind when firefox has exited uncleanly. Remove the "lock" file and all should be back to normal... Aaron find ~/.mozilla -iname lock From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 19:05:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD4416A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:05:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from vs3.bgnett.no (vs3.bgnett.no [194.54.96.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C57E43D5D for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:05:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no (skapet.datadok.no [194.54.107.19]) by vs3.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBRJ500E030781 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:05:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200512260703.jBQ73hcu060246@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:04:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200512260703.jBQ73hcu060246@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> (Imran Imtiaz's message of "Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:03:43 +0500 (PKT)") Message-ID: <86mzimmkdr.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (Social Property, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dlink wireless adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:05:11 -0000 Imran Imtiaz writes: > how can i make my dlink DWL-G122 wireless usb adapter work with freebsd? IIRC it's supported by the ural driver. With that knowledge and the wireless networking chapter in the Handbook, you should be fine. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 19:19:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C3616A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:19:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1359A43D6B for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:19:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3E615005E for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:19:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17603-01-44 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:18:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C59C7150061 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:18:52 -0500 (EST) X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBRJIqrl085203 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:18:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:18:55 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20051227124254.6e3d2301@grokwell.org> References: <20051227131407.BA44.GERARD@seibercom.net> <20051227124254.6e3d2301@grokwell.org> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051227141209.A6D8.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:19:24 -0000 On Tuesday, December 27, 2005 1:42:54 PM "Andrew L. Gould" Subject: Re: Quick Install Question Wrote these words of wisdom: > > > > Is the WinXP partition in the same computer that is running FreeBSD? Or > is the NTFS partition a shared directory on a separate WinXP computer? > (I was not aware that Samba could be used to read NTFS partitions > residing on a FreeBSD computer.) > > The original poster wishes to dual boot WinXP and FreeBSD on the same > computer. > > Andrew Gould ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: Actually, there are three computers. One is running FreeBSD 5.4 and the other two have WinXP Pro installed. I networked all three together. The WinXP systems are using the NTFS format. Samba can read and write to both of the WinXP machines without any problems. I really do not know if this is germane to a dual boot system however. It probably is not since WinXP would not actually be running when FreeBSD was in this type of configuration. Fat32 is really a poor file system when compared to NTFS. It is too bad that he is unable to get a second machine and use FreeBSD on it instead of dual booting. Just my 2¢. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net famous programmer quotation: "you'veprobable made a mistake" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 19:29:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF2F16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:29:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net (smtp2.suscom.net [64.78.83.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488E243D45 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:28:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp2.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5FA1CD569 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:26:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07001-10 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:26:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A74C81CD4C6 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:26:41 -0500 (EST) X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBRJSlUZ085228 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:28:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:28:50 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20051224141049.Q64809@seibercom.net> References: <20051224141049.Q64809@seibercom.net> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051227142436.A6DC.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Using Sendmail to add headers to mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:29:16 -0000 On Saturday, December 24, 2005 2:23:28 PM Gerard Seibert Subject: Using Sendmail to add headers to mail Wrote these words of wisdom: > I am not sure if this is possible or not. Is it possible to add custom > 'X-' headers to mail using Sendmail? For instance, suppose I wanted to add > the Habeas Headers to all my outgoing email. Is > it possible to do via Sendmail, or can this only be accomplished via my > MUA? > > I noticed on the Habeas site that there was a configuration for Exim, if > that means anything. > > > -- > Gerard > gerard@seibercom.net Well, to answer my own question, I found out that I could use LOCAL_CONFIG along with the 'H' macro to add the headers in the {domain}.mc file. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 20:20:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F7E16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:20:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60014.mail.yahoo.com (web60014.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 318E843D67 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:20:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 78311 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 20:20:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hFFltvONJIdHh1hllC/4kzRUh0z7ZHaDUKQycwNTOoBp8kiGq60Y1Q5efNDOHIZOsx75U8L/rDMNE0H2EPAfrsImF25A53kZ0EM7fpAZIHZqie1LQn/TQCGj0CyrZBY6UtpBUbNTRRSzbaHQcUpo5jemC2WdSs06CqQDdBRC3cQ= ; Message-ID: <20051227202007.78309.qmail@web60014.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.252.85.88] by web60014.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:20:07 EST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:20:07 -0500 (EST) From: Peter To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: unattended ports upgrade possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:20:09 -0000 Is there any way to fully automate the upgrade of all installed ports? Typically ncurses screens prompt for compile options. Is there any way to instruct portupgrade to use default compile values? -- Peter __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 20:23:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E461516A423; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:23:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.alkar.net (mail.alkar.net [195.248.191.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A10643D95; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:23:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from [213.227.193.75] (HELO [192.168.0.178]) by mail.alkar.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.9) with ESMTP id 418377798; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:23:46 +0200 Message-ID: <43B1BF11.10808@oxygen.az> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:24:17 +0000 From: Tofik Suleymanov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, aliyevj@hotmail.com Subject: port tree fetch errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:23:56 -0000 My ports-supfile is: *default host=cvsup.nl.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress ports-all i do: cvsup -g -z -L 2 /etc/ports-supfile and get this: Updating collection ports-all/cvs Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/boost/pkg-plist": Input/output error Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/clint/files/patch-python.h": Input/output error Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/crossgo32-djgpp2/pkg-plist": Input/output error Checkout ports/devel/Makefile Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/elib/files/patch-aa": Input/output error Need to mention that after cvsup ends i cannot compile php4 and get this errors: "Makefile", line 125: warning: " -q MPM_NAME" returned non-zero status Something happened to ports tree ? I've also tried different cvsup servers also, but had no success. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 20:28:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616B316A426; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:28:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.alkar.net (mail.alkar.net [195.248.191.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB26043D83; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:28:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from [213.227.193.75] (HELO [192.168.0.178]) by mail.alkar.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.9) with ESMTP id 418379190; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:28:28 +0200 Message-ID: <43B1C02B.6040001@oxygen.az> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:28:59 +0000 From: Tofik Suleymanov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, aliyevj@hotmail.com Subject: troubles while cvsuping ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:28:43 -0000 ms# uname -a FreeBSD ms.gltcall.com 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 ms# ms# cat /etc/ports-supfile *default host=cvsup.nl.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress ports-all ms# i do cvsup and get a lot of errors: Updating collection ports-all/cvs Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/boost/pkg-plist": Input/output error Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/clint/files/patch-python.h": Input/output error After cvsup ends i cannot install php4 port.Seems like Makefile is broken: "Makefile", line 125: warning: " -q MPM_NAME" returned non-zero status Something happened to ports tree ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 20:35:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6C016A41F; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:35:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [195.250.137.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B51C43D5A; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ikaros.oook.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBRKW998033334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:32:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by ikaros.oook.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBRKTOdw033317; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:29:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ikaros.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Tofik Suleymanov In-Reply-To: <43B1BF11.10808@oxygen.az> References: <43B1BF11.10808@oxygen.az> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-fn+5h/FrsIcZCkCM7Pwp" Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:29:24 +0100 Message-Id: <1135715364.83838.36.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, questions@FreeBSD.org, aliyevj@hotmail.com Subject: Re: port tree fetch errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:35:01 -0000 --=-fn+5h/FrsIcZCkCM7Pwp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tofik Suleymanov p=ED=B9e v =FAt 27. 12. 2005 v 22:24 +0000: > My ports-supfile is: >=20 > *default host=3Dcvsup.nl.FreeBSD.org > *default base=3D/var/db > *default prefix=3D/usr > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3D. > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > ports-all >=20 > i do: >=20 > cvsup -g -z -L 2 /etc/ports-supfile=20 >=20 > and get this: >=20 > Updating collection ports-all/cvs > Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/boost/pkg-plist":=20 > Input/output error > Cannot calculate checksum for=20 > "/usr/ports/devel/clint/files/patch-python.h": Input/output error > Cannot calculate checksum for=20 > "/usr/ports/devel/crossgo32-djgpp2/pkg-plist": Input/output error > Checkout ports/devel/Makefile > Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/elib/files/patch-aa":=20 > Input/output error Can you read the content of those files? I'd bet you got either corrupted filesystem, or your hard drive is dying. --=20 Pav Lucistnik > With a 10 MHz 386 the downloading speed would most likely drop to a crawl > or stop with the decoding process etc. I think most 10MHz 386 users are quite accustomed to things dropping to a crawl. --=-fn+5h/FrsIcZCkCM7Pwp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDsaQkntdYP8FOsoIRAoL5AJ9rhCClMfEQmfWF9a69v3qowxydiQCfcXK4 YkYbE1Q2/Q5UfHa3dilW0nY= =ZMdP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-fn+5h/FrsIcZCkCM7Pwp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 20:50:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F0D16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:50:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB5643D68 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:50:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6A5956428; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:50:35 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:50:35 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Peter Message-ID: <20051227205035.GA3190@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <20051227202007.78309.qmail@web60014.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051227202007.78309.qmail@web60014.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: unattended ports upgrade possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:50:43 -0000 On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:20:07PM -0500, Peter wrote: > Is there any way to fully automate the upgrade of all installed ports? > Typically ncurses screens prompt for compile options. Is there any way to > instruct portupgrade to use default compile values? Add a `BATCH=yes' to /etc/make.conf. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "I don't want to achive immortality through my works.. I want to achieve it through not dying" - Woody Allen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 20:57:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3BB16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B300443D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:57:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjoern.koenig@spray.se) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-231.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.231]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198104B215; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:05:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6446E5285C; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:55:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43B1AAB8.9030302@spray.se> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:57:28 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scuba@centroin.com.br References: <20051227162415.T1312@trex.centroin.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20051227162415.T1312@trex.centroin.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing lib X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:57:16 -0000 scuba@centroin.com.br schrieb: > Hi all, > > > My system (FBSD 5.4, Xorg, Gnome2), started to show the following > message. > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libexif.so.10" not found, required > by "nautilus" > > I indeed, could not find libexif.so.10. > How can I fix that? There are several ways how this could happen, but I don't want to speculate about the reasons. I guess you have installed nautilus 2.10 and a newer or older version of libexif. Make sure that you have either latest versions of both pieces of software, i.e. libexif 0.6.12_1 and nautilus2 2.12.2, or install both as packages from the same source FTP directory. If you are still unsure then show "pkg_version -v". Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 21:28:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E0916A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:28:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from usenet.ath.cx (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D522D43D81 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:28:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (dualboot.usenet.ath.cx [10.0.0.3]) by usenet.ath.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBRLSgF5016163 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:28:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <43B1B27A.5010408@bah.homeip.net> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:34 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions X-Html-In-Email: No X-Html-In-Usenet: No X-Accept-Language: Svenska Sign Engelska Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Scanner in FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:28:52 -0000 Hello?! I have a scanner that is on the list at sane and it is connected to ppc0 which I belive is the first parallelport. Anyone got a scanner attached to ppc0 to funktion? How? Scanner: Primax 4800 Direct Driver: plustek_pp OS: FreeBSD 5.4 -- NB. This is NOT a life supporting system From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 22:07:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33D316A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:07:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F99043D55 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:07:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) id <0IS600401G1TS9@asu.edu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) with ESMTP id <0IS6002QCG1TJ8@asu.edu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from teancum.pp.asu.edu (teancum.pp.asu.edu [129.219.69.212]) by smtp.asu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/asu_smtp_relay, nullclient, tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id jBRM5qj5016487 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:52 -0700 (MST) Received: by teancum.pp.asu.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8FAD8CA3; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:52 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:52 -0700 From: David Bear To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20051227220552.GB16689@asu.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: upgrade by hand X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.Bear@asu.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:07:11 -0000 In all the searches I've done about upgrade from a Rel4.x to Rel6. all the info seems to center on using cvsup and port upgrade, and using Rel5 is an intermediate step to get to Rel6. Maybe I just like pain, but are there any instructions for 'manually' upgrading from 'most any prior freebsd' to latest production release? In other words, what files MUST be backed up and restored (master.password, etc) and what CANNOT be reused (changes to current password/group files or other files are too much to allow an upgrade of this type) I'm just concerned about Freebsd base -- I only use 3 items from the ports collection and I don't mind rebuilding these. (perhaps I'm stuck on the word 'upgrade' when there is a better word for a format and reload but preserve user/group/file system mode bits etc) -- David Bear phone: 480-965-8257 fax: 480-965-9189 College of Public Programs/ASU Wilson Hall 232 Tempe, AZ 85287-0803 "Beware the IP portfolio, everyone will be suspect of trespassing" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 22:12:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6E216A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:12:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robertames@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay114-f11.bay114.hotmail.com [65.54.169.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C91043D70 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:12:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robertames@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:12:14 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.169.200 by by114fd.bay114.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:12:14 GMT X-Originating-IP: [67.166.250.21] X-Originating-Email: [robertames@hotmail.com] X-Sender: robertames@hotmail.com From: "Robert Ames" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:12:14 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Dec 2005 22:12:14.0401 (UTC) FILETIME=[97762310:01C60B32] Subject: New IDE drive in old PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:12:18 -0000 I have an old (very old) ASUS P5 motherboard running FreeBSD 5.4. The boot disk is a 40MB Western Digital WD400 IDE drive jumpered to only use 32MB so it can be booted from since the BIOS in this PC (the latest and greatest) can't deal with anything larger than 32MB. This PC is working well for me and I don't want to upgrade it. However I would like to add a lot of disk space. So my question is, can I go out and buy a new 300 GB (or whatever) IDE disk and attach it to the secondary IDE controller and hope to use all 300 GB? I will still use the old disk for booting and to hold the OS. The new disk will be just for data. If this will "just work" how do I configure the BIOS so the PC will boot with the large drive installed? _________________________________________________________________ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 22:16:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA07A16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:16:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E82143D5E for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:16:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 2040 invoked by uid 502); 27 Dec 2005 22:16:04 -0000 Received: from dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.97.72) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 22:16:04 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.97.72 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com Message-ID: <43B1BD23.6070704@ywave.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:16:03 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernt Hansson References: <43B1B27A.5010408@bah.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <43B1B27A.5010408@bah.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Scanner in FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:16:06 -0000 Bernt Hansson wrote: > Hello?! > > I have a scanner that is on the list at sane and it is connected to ppc0 > which I belive is the first parallelport. > > Anyone got a scanner attached to ppc0 to funktion? How? > > > Scanner: > > Primax 4800 Direct > > Driver: > > plustek_pp > > OS: > > FreeBSD 5.4 > > The last time I tried, plustek_pp required libieee1284 for parallel port access. Libieee1284 is unsupported in FreeBSD (at least the 5 series FreeBSD). Your best bet is to go out and get a supported USB or SCSI scanner or install your scanner on a Linux SANE server. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 22:17:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7F816A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:17:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illusion65@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DC543D62 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:17:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illusion65@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1421190nzo for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ChXqpuGGWwkun/nx1fPIfk9xEK87sCedh6efqar4B7xbcjr4+/iDa5Hrd1FGw8mYse1S9NqACcOou3/t35jG1bJpMB8oDofAYBLKasCyZxTbP4A9gA6Lc9Af8cuEAK76PaGSET+BMvRFlHOq+VM1gVzoSBn1piDjW9YU1BEPpRQ= Received: by 10.36.18.17 with SMTP id 17mr4784807nzr; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.10.80? ( [60.234.223.58]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 36sm48092nzk.2005.12.27.14.17.17; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:17:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43B1BD6D.3070903@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:17:17 +1300 From: Doug Hawkins User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051210) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, dgoldberg@tarshis.com References: <20051227131407.BA44.GERARD@seibercom.net> <20051227124254.6e3d2301@grokwell.org> <20051227141209.A6D8.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20051227141209.A6D8.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:17:27 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: >On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: > >Actually, there are three computers. One is running FreeBSD 5.4 and the >other two have WinXP Pro installed. I networked all three together. The >WinXP systems are using the NTFS format. Samba can read and write to >both of the WinXP machines without any problems. > >I really do not know if this is germane to a dual boot system however. >It probably is not since WinXP would not actually be running when >FreeBSD was in this type of configuration. > >Fat32 is really a poor file system when compared to NTFS. It is too bad >that he is unable to get a second machine and use FreeBSD on it instead >of dual booting. > Unfortunately, NTFS is not documented by Microsoft so non-Microsoft drivers cannot write to that file system reliably. See http://www.linux-ntfs.org/ -- they've put a lot of work into discovering how to use NTFS. So 'out-of-the-box', FreeBSD OS can mount and read from NTFS partitions, but not write. Samba allows computers to exchange files, but uses each computer's local OS to access a filesystem. There are GUI tools that use the linux-ntfs utility 'ntfsresize' to resize an NTFS partition, so you can add a FreeBSD partition even if you have a pre-built NTFS install. I keep a copy of 'SystemRescueCD' around for just that purpose, since it has those tools already. Some of the WinXP "recovery' disks will wipe out your entire drive when you 'recover', so as most people will recommend, install Windows first(!) because it's install utilities are very presumptuous and you can easily waste all your previous effort on a different OS. I have read that there is a way to use the WinXP NTFS driver from within Linux (and probably FreeBSD) to provide NTFS write support, but I have not tried that yet. In any case, Welcome Daniel! Good luck with your install. If you are installing on a machine whose BIOS is a few years old, you may find the 1024-cylinder limitation: the BIOS will not boot from a partition whose start is beyond that limit. If it's a new machine, then you probably don't need to worry about it. If you do, create a small NTFS partition for WinXP, then the FreeBSD partition, then a larger NTFS partition if you need it (it will appear as drive 'd:'). I always keep a reasonably sized FAT32 partition so I can transfer files between the two OS's (that's the only 'common' read/write FS). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 22:24:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375D016A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:24:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adelzip@mail.ru) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C185943D45 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:24:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adelzip@mail.ru) Received: from [217.30.254.228] (port=1228 helo=[217.30.254.228]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1ErNFA-0003Lj-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:24:33 +0300 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:24:30 +0300 From: "ho@xer" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional Organization: tuLZa inc. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <409829723.20051228012430@mail.ru> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected Cc: Subject: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "ho@xer" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:24:35 -0000 Good morning ! Sorry for my bad English. I'm write from Russia. I have some problem with installing FreeBSD 6 amd64 ! You my last chance ! No one dont give me a answer for my question. I put CD to cdrom and after some second I press 1 to install default settings. After some second I see that ........ Vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 221134344311z quality 800 Timecounter tuck every 1.000 msec What's wrong what I do wrong ?? Please say !! Thank s ! Good bye ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 22:30:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758D416A420 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from palm_7777@yahoo.ca) Received: from web36110.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web36110.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C09E343D55 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from palm_7777@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 35795 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2005 22:30:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HCJe8OHYdSgCiOBm0SzpU+9lvskTbgUJpJi1FNCBFg4jBvNwaEOGi84ELAZBcV/97rmb6ZrQRFdVmjaeh8lhScWLo03oLH5sMxo5rexpHJ/2ECR06YcGwXlC90y9AvHvElxrRIMLZySQ/Qw18X/xf2roSCYO/j6ewM7Kh6xCL0A= ; Message-ID: <20051227223018.35793.qmail@web36110.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.222.91.137] by web36110.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:30:18 EST Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:30:18 -0500 (EST) From: Jon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051227120040.9D6F316A420@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: 3D Hardware Graphics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:30:19 -0000 > Hello all, > > I'm wondering how to get 3D Hardware graphics going > under FreeBSD. > I tried both the LibGL.so that came with the driver > for my graphics card and the default LibGL.so that > came with FreeBSD '/usr/X11R6/lib' but no go, still > slow software mode. I have a DRI radeon enabled driver > and a radeon driver for xorg.conf, AGP was built into > my kernel. What else can I try to get this going? > > Thanks > FreeBSD 6.0 STABLE - ATI Radeon 9800 Pro ------------ >This is almost not possible because ATI doesn't provide a driver >for >FreeBSD and the driver that comes with X.org supports only >models up to >Radeon 9000 concerning 3D capabilities; you'll find more >information >about supported cards in the "radeon" manpage of the xorg-server >package. There is an open source project that aims 3D support >for more >recent cards: > >http://r300.sourceforge.net/R300.php > >Regards >Björn ----------- Hello, I managed to get r300 to compile and installed into 'usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri - r300_dri.so'. I found a nice source package under the FreeBSD ports 'dri-6.2.20050719,1' that downloded the source for r300, Mesa3D and drm, it built and installed fine. I ran Xmoto as a test GL game and it was still slow 2 FPS mode, I did a glxinfo command and it said dri is not enabled. Any more suggestions to get this going? Thanks! Xorg.conf: ---------- Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "freetype" Load "type1" EndSection ----------------- Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" EndSection ------------ Identifier "Card0" Driver "ati" VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc" BoardName "Radeon R350 [Radeon 9800]" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" --------------- __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 22:34:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDA016A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:34:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518A543D5A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9864 helo=assata.aseed.net) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ErNOZ-000KWB-Pv; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:34:15 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by assata.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ACA112C160; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:34:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (a79080.upc-a.chello.nl [62.163.79.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABE958C6B8; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:37:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:36:06 +0100 From: albi To: "Daniel Goldberg" Message-Id: <20051227173606.0cf67296.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <001301c60b00$7d3fb330$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> References: <001301c60b00$7d3fb330$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:34:18 -0000 On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:13:30 -0600 "Daniel Goldberg" wrote: > What is the order of installing FreeBSD for a dual-boot XP environment > on a single HDD using GAG > (ie, which do I install first, which partition for each os, is there a > resource for this answer published somewhere anyway???) first install the Microsoft-OS, and then FreeBSD (and make sure there's 1 primary partition left for FreeBSD to install on) see also : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 22:47:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDBC16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:47:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE0143D49 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:47:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from echobase.hoth.dk (echobase.hoth.dk [80.62.210.27]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB145EE00D for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:47:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by echobase.hoth.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EA97A19AF6; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:47:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:47:40 +0100 From: "Martin P. Hansen" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051227224740.GA24865@echobase.hoth.dk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43B0770E.20000@pobox.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43B0770E.20000@pobox.sk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: FreeBSD Logo Contest -- whom to contact about? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:47:43 -0000 On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, martinko wrote: > also, could other submitted designs be seen somewhere? (at least top 5 > of them) I'd like to see them as well. I suppose, if bold enough, one could mail the authors found at http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ . I've come to belive that this http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/640.png was one of the entries. -- Martin P. Hansen | () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | /\ Against HTML Email! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 23:17:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A261A16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:17:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from usenet.ath.cx (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5C743D4C for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:17:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (dualboot.usenet.ath.cx [10.0.0.3]) by usenet.ath.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBRNHRNe017523 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:17:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <43B1CBF8.1020401@bah.homeip.net> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:19:20 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions References: <43B1B27A.5010408@bah.homeip.net> <43B1BD23.6070704@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <43B1BD23.6070704@ywave.com> X-Html-In-Email: No X-Html-In-Usenet: No X-Accept-Language: Svenska Sign Engelska Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Scanner in FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:17:37 -0000 Micah wrote: > Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> Hello?! >> >> I have a scanner that is on the list at sane and it is connected to >> ppc0 which I belive is the first parallelport. >> Anyone got a scanner attached to ppc0 to funktion? How? >> Scanner: >> Primax 4800 Direct >> Driver: >> plustek_pp >> OS: >> FreeBSD 5.4 > The last time I tried, plustek_pp required libieee1284 for parallel port > access. > Libieee1284 is unsupported in FreeBSD (at least the 5 series > FreeBSD). I've noticed that. /Frustation AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Frustration/ > Your best bet is to go out and get a supported USB or SCSI Vell i've been looking at some agfa skanners. > scanner or install your scanner on a Linux SANE server. That's a no op > HTH, > Micah > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 23:46:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF6D16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:46:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@jeneral.com) Received: from jeneral.com (216-19-202-150.getnet.net [216.19.202.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7835143D7D for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:45:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@jeneral.com) Received: (qmail 79175 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2005 23:45:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pcut1.jeneral.com) (209.63.206.193) by adoption-option.com with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 23:45:51 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20051227162926.06546568@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: mail.jeneral.com:brent@jeneral.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:45:57 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Brent Jensen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Segment Fault w/ PHP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:46:00 -0000 I'm getting segment faults on all 3 of my webservers. I upgraded all of my packages thinking that would fix the offending program; however, php is throwing segment faults. For example, when trying to INSTALL pear_DB. I get seg faults when updating # cd /usr/ports/databases/pear-DB # make (goes though its thing) # make install ===> Installing for pear-DB-1.7.6,1 ===> pear-DB-1.7.6,1 depends on file: /usr/local/share/pear/PEAR.php - found ===> pear-DB-1.7.6,1 depends on executable: pear - found ===> Generating packing list ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if databases/pear-DB already installed ===> Installing documentation in /usr/local/share/doc/pear/DB. ===> Installing tests in /usr/local/share/pear/tests/DB. install ok: channel://pear.php.net/DB-1.7.6 Segmentation fault (core dumped) *** Error code 139 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/pear-DB. /var/messages shows: (php), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) ALSO: portupgrade -f pear-Mail_Queue ---> Reinstalling 'pear-Mail_Queue-1.1.3' (mail/pear-Mail_Queue) ---> Building '/usr/ports/mail/pear-Mail_Queue' ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.2_1 ... blah blah blah ... ===> Checking if mail/pear-Mail already installed ===> Installing tests in /usr/local/share/pear/tests/Mail. install ok: channel://pear.php.net/Mail-1.1.9 Segmentation fault (core dumped) *** Error code 139 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/pear-Mail. *** Error code 1 And when stopping or restarting Apache it generates an HTTP segment fault (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) When I rem out from apache things are happy! Every port is now current. I have even rebuilt several ports. This one's got me. Any hints? Thanks, Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 23:47:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89A016A426 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:47:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk (pfepa.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54C343D6A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:47:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from echobase.hoth.dk (echobase.hoth.dk [80.62.210.27]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC89D47FE05 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:47:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by echobase.hoth.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 89F0619AF7; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:47:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:47:16 +0100 From: "Martin P. Hansen" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20051227234716.GC24865@echobase.hoth.dk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <409829723.20051228012430@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <409829723.20051228012430@mail.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:47:24 -0000 On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, ho@xer wrote: > I have some problem with installing FreeBSD 6 amd64 ! ... > I put CD to cdrom and after some second I press 1 to install default > settings. After some second I see that ... > ........ > Vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 221134344311z quality 800 > Timecounter tuck every 1.000 msec What you see it the kernel diagnostic messages. In my diagnosticmessages ``Timecounters'' appear near the end, just before the harddisk controller initialization. If your system stops with the message you wrote, it might be some compability issues between your hardware and the kernel. You might narrow the problem down by experimenting with various compability options in the bios. One example could be to enable (or disable) SATA compability mode, PATA I think. -- Martin P. Hansen | () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | /\ Against HTML Email! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 23:54:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3390616A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:54:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870B643D46 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:54:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from alpha.home (ppp145-189.lns3.adl2.internode.on.net [59.167.145.189]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jBRNshIs099840; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:24:43 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: danial_thom@yahoo.com Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:24:38 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20051227154529.52973.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051227154529.52973.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512281024.38359.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: rod person , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:54:51 -0000 On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:15 am, Danial Thom wrote: > --- Malcolm Kay > > wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:27 am, Danial Thom > > > > wrote: > > > Schwab Streetsmart > > > Accounting Software (CA) > > > Quicken > > > Photoshop > > > Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs) > > > > > > Those are the ones I use daily. Surely there > > > > are > > > > > some half-assed alternatives for some of > > > > these, > > > > > but if I have to use something inferior to > > > > use > > > > > FreeBSD then thats a point against it. > > > > This is all a question of the applications you > > need. > > My game is full custom integrated circuit > > design and > > suitable CAD software is available, at a price, > > on > > most unix style systems including Solaris, > > HP-UX, > > various Linux distributions and FreeBSD. In > > this > > field it is the Windows half-assed alternatives > > that are distinctly inferior. > > No, its a point of applications that one would > reasonably need to run a business. I can't run a > business from your CAD workstation. I can't live > without accounting software. > > I would hardly call apps such as Cadence > "half-assed", even if you prefer something else. > In fact, Candence runs on Windows, Linux and > Solaris but NOT FreeBSD, and its by far the most > used product the market in that genre. > Cadence have a wide range of products some of which=20 run on Windows platforms. But you will be struggling=20 to do much with Full Custom on XP. There are some alternatives offered on FreeBSD --=20 admittedly inferior to the top Cadence products but also at less than 10% of the licensing costs. I thought the discussion was about desktop software not business software; but even so if your business=20 is IC design then I would think a good CAD suite was=20 pretty essential. Malcolm Kay > DT > > > > __________________________________________ > Yahoo! DSL =96 Something to write home about. > Just $16.99/mo. or less. > dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 23:51:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F5416A41F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:51:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D27843D53 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:51:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id jBRNo3V85753; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:50:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Authentication-Warning: mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com: nobody set sender to tedm@toybox.placo.com using -f To: danial_thom@yahoo.com, Danial Thom Message-ID: <1135727402.43b1d32abc6c8@mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:50:02 -0800 (PST) References: <20051227150556.47543.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051227150556.47543.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 65.75.206.111 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:02:00 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Winelfred G. Pasamba" , Ted Mittelstaedt , pretenda@wrgn.net Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:51:53 -0000 Quoting Danial Thom : > > > --- Ted Mittelstaedt > wrote: > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Danial Thom > > [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] > > >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:50 AM > > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba > > >Cc: pretenda@wrgn.net; > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL > > connections > > > > > > > > > > > >As stated, even by Ted, you have to register > > ALL > > >of your addresses with ALL of your ISPs, so > > you > > >can send your packets to ANYONE you want, even > > if > > >they are filtering. > > > > > > > No, what I said is that any ISP that is an > > end-node AS > > and gets a feed from a network must tell that > > network > > what IP blocks they are using to send traffic > > from. > > > > You're a very sick person, Ted. If you use BGP, > both of your providers have to "know" about all > of your address blocks. My VERY FIRST response to the original poster was that their scheme would not work UNLESS they were running BGP. > So if they "know" about > your address blocks, then you can load balance > instead of using BGP. Its the same damn thing, > you incompetent blob :) > > There's little point in being multi-homed if you > can't send all of your traffic up EITHER pipe. If > you couldn't, you'd be out of business if one of > your pipes was down,which simply isn't the case. > > I really don't know what's wrong with you, except > that you seem obsessed with being on the opposite > side of whatever arguement I'm one. You're making > a goddamned fool of yourself. > I think you are arguing with a series of straw men. Perhaps you might try READING THE RESPONSES for a change? Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 00:17:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730B416A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:17:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A133343D5D for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id jBS0Khl85933; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:20:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Authentication-Warning: mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com: nobody set sender to tedm@toybox.placo.com using -f To: danial_thom@yahoo.com, Danial Thom Message-ID: <1135729242.43b1da5a716a0@mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:20:42 -0800 (PST) References: <20051227160015.58584.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051227160015.58584.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 65.75.206.111 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:22:45 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Loren M. Lang" , "Winelfred G. Pasamba" , Ted Mittelstaedt , Yance Kowara Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:17:32 -0000 Quoting Danial Thom : > > > --- Ted Mittelstaedt > wrote: > > > > > Does it meet the test I already outlined? > > > > Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a > > remote server, > > with both lines connected. Time it. > > > > Disconnect 1 line, then repeat the test. If > > the time to > > download and upload when both DSL lines are > > connected is > > half the time it takes when 1 DSL line is > > connected, then > > your load-balancing. > > > > If not, then you are not - although if it makes > > you feel > > like you haven't wasted your money claim your > > "per session load balancing" then I suppose it > > would be > > uncharitable to make you feel bad by pointing > > out that > > this is purely a marketing term with no > > networking > > significance. > > > > Oops. > > > > Ted > > > Ted seems incapable of grasping how things work, > so I don't recommend wasting your time on > anything he says. > > As I stated, you cannot control how traffic comes > into your network, so Ted's little download test > is sure not to work. Danial, once again your having trouble reading. That little test was for BOTH a download AND an upload test. So, are you sure that the upload component of my little test WILL work? Perhaps we might have the poster I responded to actually RUN the test and report the results? Traffic is routed to > whichever ISP has the best route. You can only > control how traffic goes OUT of your network. So > load-balancing can only increase your upload > speeds, not your download speeds. If you are > hosting this is useful. If you have mostly > download traffic, then its probably not worth is. > Once again Danial you flee to arguing from theory and not reality. Until the second poster tries the test I proposed and reports the results, you are really wasting time. As I said before, try the test. If your download speed is doubled with both DSL lines turned on, your load balancing. If your upload speed is doubled with both DSL lines turned on then your load balancing. If your download speed is NOT doubled YET your upload speed IS doubled with both DSL lines connected, then you are also load balancing - after a fashion - although the reason this works is that one of the ISP's is not properly ingress filtering. (assuming the DSL lines are connected to different ISPs, presumably if they are connected to the same ISP you would have already got multilink PPP or some other kind of real load balancing setup with that ISP) And if that is the case, then the ISP that isn't ingress filtering, has a network full of spoofed traffic from DDoS trojans and such, and it is unlikely you would find their bandwidth that useable in the first place. Additionally, since your making use of the failure of one of the ISP's to properly ingress filter, this sort of 'load balance' could disappear without warning. It is not something you would depend on for production use and few ISP's are like this anymore. In any case, I think chances that the second poster would observed doubled upload speed with both lines connected, on the file test I illustrated, are virtually zero. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 00:59:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CEB16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:59:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2916943D53 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:59:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 7785 invoked by uid 207); 28 Dec 2005 00:59:17 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.30/3.97. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.96):. Processed in 0.471063 secs); 28 Dec 2005 00:59:17 -0000 Received: from dialup96.ach.sch.gr (HELO flame.pc) ([81.186.70.96]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 00:59:16 -0000 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BAAB01184C; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:58:02 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:58:02 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Kiffin Gish Message-ID: <20051228005802.GA8568@flame.pc> References: <000501c60acf$7a678330$2101a8c0@ZGISH> <43B1203A.3060706@alphaque.com> <001901c60b08$e6ed40b0$2401a8c0@XGISH> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001901c60b08$e6ed40b0$2401a8c0@XGISH> Cc: Dinesh Nair , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless woes: upgrade 5.4 to 6.0, wi0, etc... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:59:22 -0000 On 2005-12-27 18:13, Kiffin Gish wrote: > Yes I have. I also added it to the loader.conf file, the kernel > configuration file, done a buildkernel etc. but no luck. > > # /boot/loader.conf > wlan_wep_load="YES" > > # /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > device wlan_wep I think this is why you're getting the message: ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_wep module by hand for now Try removing it from your kernel config file and loading it through loader.conf only. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 01:05:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C59A16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:05:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8421B43D55 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:05:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 8784 invoked by uid 207); 28 Dec 2005 01:05:25 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.30/3.97. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.96):. Processed in 0.481361 secs); 28 Dec 2005 01:05:25 -0000 Received: from dialup96.ach.sch.gr (HELO flame.pc) ([81.186.70.96]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 01:05:24 -0000 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 598BE115E3; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:04:11 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:04:11 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Doug Hardie Message-ID: <20051228010411.GB8568@flame.pc> References: <03683319-0CC1-4367-BCBC-29D0D4B97D41@lafn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <03683319-0CC1-4367-BCBC-29D0D4B97D41@lafn.org> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:05:29 -0000 On 2005-12-26 23:49, Doug Hardie wrote: > I am upgrading a server to 6.0 and encountered an error in make > buildworld. However, I don't know what the error was as I piped > stdout to a file, but not stderr. I usually keep them both, with something like: # cd /usr/src/ # cvs -q up -APd | logfile.cvs # make buildworld buildkernel 2>&1 | tee logfile.build > It was fairly near the end so I really hate to restart from the > beginning again. The master server is a fairly slow machine. Then, someone could argue that the problem is not a build that's failing, but the fact that you're using a slow machine as the build server :-/ I'm afraid there's no way to recover data that has scrolled off the scrollback buffer of syscons or screen(1), when the same data wasn't saved in a file. > When something like this happens, is there a way to restart the make > where it died? You can try using -DNO_CLEAN, but this will do a fair bit of work too. > Is there an easy way to build the specific module that failed to get > the complete errors? In this case the module was /usr/libexec/telnet. > I went to /usr/src/ libexec/telnet and did a make. Then the error was somewhere else. Were you using make -j XXX with a non-default XXX number? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 01:14:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4533716A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:14:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (c-67-168-241-176.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.241.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D494843D4C for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:14:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id jBS1F8M06963; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:15:08 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id BAA25381; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:14:22 GMT Message-Id: <200512280114.BAA25381@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, mr_trutt@hotmail.com Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:14:22 +0000 From: Dieter Cc: Subject: Re: Alpha 6.0 Install... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:14:56 -0000 > boot_osflags 0,0 leads to: > Unrecognized boot flag '0'. > Unrecognized boot flag ','. > Unrecognized boot flag '0'. NetBSD/alpha uses s single-user mode bootstrap. a (automatic) multi-user mode bootstrap. although FreeBSD may well use different flags. I can't seem to find an Alpha version of FreeBSD's boot(8) man page. :-( FreeBSD's x86 boot(8) man page says 's' is also single user, so... Perhaps try: >>>boot -flags s dka400 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 01:21:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAF816A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:21:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5864E43D55 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:21:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 11700 invoked by uid 207); 28 Dec 2005 01:21:21 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.30/3.97. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.96):. Processed in 0.127083 secs); 28 Dec 2005 01:21:21 -0000 Received: from dialup96.ach.sch.gr (HELO flame.pc) ([81.186.70.96]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 01:21:20 -0000 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B57421155E; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:20:08 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:20:08 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Bear Message-ID: <20051228012008.GC8568@flame.pc> References: <20051227220552.GB16689@asu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051227220552.GB16689@asu.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade by hand X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:21:26 -0000 On 2005-12-27 15:05, David Bear wrote: > In all the searches I've done about upgrade from a Rel4.x to Rel6. all > the info seems to center on using cvsup and port upgrade, and using > Rel5 is an intermediate step to get to Rel6. That's right. It should always be possible to use the latest version of RELENG_X to build and install version RELENG_Y when (Y = X + 1). The same is not always true for two major branches ahead. > Maybe I just like pain, but are there any instructions for 'manually' > upgrading from 'most any prior freebsd' to latest production release? I've upgraded systems from 4.7-RELEASE to 6.0-CURRENT in more than one steps: one for 4.7 ==> 5.3-RELEASE, 5.3-RELEASE ==> 5-STABLE, and then finally, 5-STABLE ==> 6.0-CURRENT. The process of building and installing everything is always the same: buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, boot single user, installworld, mergemaster. Any extra steps required every time are described in detail in /usr/src/UPDATING after the source tree is updated at each upgrade step. > In other words, what files MUST be backed up and restored > (master.password, etc) and what CANNOT be reused (changes to current > password/group files or other files are too much to allow an upgrade > of this type) A full backup is wise, at this point. If something goes wrong after 2 or 3 build & install cycles, it's nice to be able to go back to a well-known, stable state. > I'm just concerned about Freebsd base -- I only use 3 items from the > ports collection and I don't mind rebuilding these. > > (perhaps I'm stuck on the word 'upgrade' when there is a better word > for a format and reload but preserve user/group/file system mode bits > etc) Are you installing 6.0-RELEASE from scratch or building from source? If you are installing from scratch, reformatting the partitions too (which is the only way to reformat the partitions to use UFS2 instead of UFS1), then it's still a good idea to start with a full backup. If you have the installation disks of the original FreeBSD version, and you don't mind a little extra downtime, you can even create 2 sets of backup files: - Original FreeBSD version of the base system - Your current base system installation Then go ahead and install FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE. You can compare the files of the two backup sets, i.e. by looking at the output of commands like: # tar tzvf backup-freebsd-plain.tar.gz | sort -k +9 > /tmp/before.txt # tar tzvf backup-freebsd.tar.gz | sort -k +9 > /tmp/after.txt This should give you a good idea of what files are different in your current installation from the original FreeBSD files, and you can selectively restore on top of FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE the changes that you want to keep :) - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 01:22:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5148116A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:22:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922CA43D46 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:22:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDA062C887 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:22:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32138-06 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:22:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86E962C848 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:22:38 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83AE43ADC1; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:22:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FEB33C2B for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:22:42 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:22:42 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051227211433.J1087@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: "Load Balancing": How Busy are the servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:22:48 -0000 Two part question here ... first leads into the second, and the second might answer the first ... 1. What variables on a server should be monitored to determine how busy a server is? For instance, I've always been taugth that 'loadavg' is not an indication of how busy a server is, since a high loadavg on a single CPU server might be an overloaded server, but moderately loaded on a dual CPU server ... disk i/o, cpu usage, ethernet throughput ... what else? 2. Are there any tools that I can run to give me a point in time "summary" of how busy a server is based on these several factors? Basically, I'd like to keep track of multiple servers and be able to say "this server is running >75% of capacity, time to upgrade or move things off of it" ... if its possible ... ? thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 01:54:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062EE16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:54:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725F243D49 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:54:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so1391458nzo for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:54:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=gQL3YcCtRZuEQPISyGRIe/XC0rewbxQkOK89K3BhPtvbPUSrzGRFYv9K2dbKaVOKwrrQJVwnG/ZD3EK77eC8lpwxqX1mHHcjWrrS4VMQSBUTB8DThcUJFwgfdRUHK1KR2Z0PFSdWx56m3vimf15vmiTnTEc07gOTOL0wNQvEhFU= Received: by 10.36.41.1 with SMTP id o1mr4827321nzo; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:54:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id j4sm4837395nzd.2005.12.27.17.54.17; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:54:19 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: Giorgos Keramidas Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:57:03 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512261107.45871.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <20051226161222.GA1038@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20051226161222.GA1038@flame.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512280957.03981.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:54:22 -0000 On Tuesday 27 December 2005 00:12, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-12-26 11:07, Yuan Jue wrote: > > instead, I figure out another way to work around. > > > > 1.ifconfig bge0 delete > > % this would shut my local NIC down totally > > > > 2.kldload if_ath > > dhclient ath0 > > > > then I can enjoy the wireless internet surfing :) > > > > antway, thank you again! > > FWIW, > > On my laptop, which has to switch between a couple of wireless networks and > my local LAN at home, I use custom shell scripts called ``/root/net/*.sh'' > to encapsulate the changes I'd have to manually make. > > I have prepared working sets of files, like: > > /etc/resolv.conf_home > /etc/resolv.conf_work > > and then run /root/net/home.sh which contains: > > #!/bin/sh > > if test -n "$1" && test -f "/root/netstart-home-$1.sh" ; then > mode="$1" > else > mode=wlan > fi > > echo "## Stopping local services" > /etc/rc.d/named stop > /etc/rc.d/sendmail stop > > echo "## Setting up /etc and /usr/local/etc files" > ( > cd /etc; > cp resolv.conf_home resolv.conf; > cp dhclient.conf_home dhclient.conf; > cp namedb/named.conf_home namedb/named.conf; > > cd /usr/local/etc/postfix; > cp main.cf_home main.cf; > ) > > echo "## Bringing up the network connection" > "/root/net/netstart-home-${mode}.sh" > > echo "## Refreshing the firewall rules" > /etc/rc.d/pf reload > > echo "## Starting local services again" > /etc/rc.d/named start > /etc/rc.d/sendmail start > > The real work is done by netstart-home-wlan.sh or netstart-home-wlan.sh. > The wlan script is the one that sets up a wireless connection, and > contains: > > #!/bin/sh > > # Default setup for my bge0 interface. > export ifconfig_ath0="DHCP ssid 'gker' \ > wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey > '1:0xXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX'" export defaultrouter="192.168.1.2" > > /etc/rc.d/netif stop bge0 > /etc/rc.d/netif stop ath0 > > echo -n "Waiting for ath0 to associate " > _timeout=0 > _associated=NO > while [ "$_timeout" -lt 30 ]; do > status=$( ifconfig ath0 2>&1 | grep status: |\ > awk '{print $2}' ) > if [ X"${status}" = X"associated" ]; then > _associated=YES > break > fi > echo -n '.' > sleep 1 > _timeout=$(( $_timeout + 1 )) > done > if [ X"${_associated}" = X"YES" ]; then > echo " ok" > else > echo '' > echo "Failed to bring up ath0. Aborting." > /etc/rc.d/netif stop ath0 > exit 1 > fi > > # > # The default route may be pointing to another interface. Find out > # the IP address of the default gateway, delete it and point to the > # default gateway of my home network. > # > if [ -n "${defaultrouter}" ]; then > _oldrouter=`netstat -rn | grep default | awk '{print $2}'` > if [ -n "${_oldrouter}" ]; then > route delete default "${_oldrouter}" > unset _oldrouter > fi > route add default "$defaultrouter" > fi > > This seems to work remarkably well so far. All I need to do once the > laptop boots is to log in as root and run the proper /root/net/*.sh script > :) thanks for your shell scripts. it is very appreciated. thanks again :) -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 01:58:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CCF16A422 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:58:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from m21.unixathome.org (m21.unixathome.org [205.150.199.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEEC43D5A for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:58:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [205.150.199.217]) by m21.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0CAC36F; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:58:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from m21.unixathome.org ([205.150.199.217]) by localhost (m21.unixathome.org [205.150.199.217]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04759-10; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:58:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [70.26.229.230]) by m21.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E5FBF57; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.55.0.99] (wocker.unixathome.org [10.55.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6723D3B; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:58:50 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" To: Ariff Abdullah Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:58:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <43B1AB09.2235.7054EC7@dan.langille.org> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20051225025934.2455a5a3.skywizard@MyBSD.org.my> References: <43AD4124.6711.387213B@dan.langille.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.31) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unixathome.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6: routing on the local LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:58:58 -0000 On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500 > "Dan Langille" wrote: > > Gidday folks, > > > > I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway. > > > > I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The tunnel is > > > > setup and working. From my gateway I can access various IPv6 > > websites (e.g http://www.kame.net). I have enabled rtadvd(8) on my > > gateway. For the netstat, ifconfig, etc, see [1]. > > > > >From a computer inside my gateway, I cannot ping anything, not even > > > > > the gateway. I suspect it's because the routing tables are not > > being set up on the gateway. I expected the system to do that > > automatically. I also expected fxp0 to get an IPv6 address out of > > this. Did I guess wrong? I suspect that if I can get fxp0 on the > > gateway, all will be well. If not, I think Ineed to set up static > > routes. > > Add a single 2001:470:1F00:1979::/64 address each for both fxp0/1. You > don't even need rtadv.conf :) > > rc.conf:- > ipv6_ifconfig_fxp0="2001:470:1F00:1979::1/64" > ipv6_ifconfig_fxp1="2001:470:1F00:1979::2/64" Right you are! I just renamed /etc/rtadvd.conf to something else, rebooted the gateway, confirmed rtadvd was running, then I rebooted the workstation. It came back with: $ ifconfig fxp0 fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 10.55.0.23 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.55.0.255 inet6 fe80::204:acff:fed3:7823%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 2001:470:1f00:1979:204:acff:fed3:7823 prefixlen 64 autoconf ether 00:04:ac:d3:78:23 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active $ You suggested putting an IPv6 address on fxp0 (the NIC on my gateway that faces my ISP). Why? No IPv6 traffic should meet that NIC. It should all go out the tunnel on gif0. fxp1 is my LAN, so I can see why I need an IPv6 address there. Thank you. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 01:26:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF0516A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:26:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B458043D68 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:26:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id jBS1SQW86298; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:28:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Authentication-Warning: mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com: nobody set sender to tedm@toybox.placo.com using -f To: danial_thom@yahoo.com, Danial Thom Message-ID: <1135733305.43b1ea39b3427@mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:28:25 -0800 (PST) References: <20051227183826.44291.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051227183826.44291.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 65.75.206.111 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:59:41 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Loren M. Lang" , "Winelfred G. Pasamba" , Ted Mittelstaedt , Yance Kowara Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:26:47 -0000 Quoting Danial Thom : > > > --- Danial Thom wrote: > > > > > > > --- Ted Mittelstaedt > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Does it meet the test I already outlined? > > > > > > Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a > > > remote server, > > > with both lines connected. Time it. > > > > > > Disconnect 1 line, then repeat the test. If > > > the time to > > > download and upload when both DSL lines are > > > connected is > > > half the time it takes when 1 DSL line is > > > connected, then > > > your load-balancing. > > > > > > If not, then you are not - although if it > > makes > > > you feel > > > like you haven't wasted your money claim your > > > "per session load balancing" then I suppose > > it > > > would be > > > uncharitable to make you feel bad by pointing > > > out that > > > this is purely a marketing term with no > > > networking > > > significance. > > > > > > Oops. > > > > > > Ted > > > > > > Ted seems incapable of grasping how things > > work, > > so I don't recommend wasting your time on > > anything he says. > > > > As I stated, you cannot control how traffic > > comes > > into your network, so Ted's little download > > test > > is sure not to work. Traffic is routed to > > whichever ISP has the best route. You can only > > control how traffic goes OUT of your network. > > So > > load-balancing can only increase your upload > > speeds, not your download speeds. If you are > > hosting this is useful. If you have mostly > > download traffic, then its probably not worth > > is. > > > > I don't know if Ted is trying to boondoggle you > > into thinking his view is correct, or he just > > doesn't understand it. I suspect its a bit of > > both. > > > > You should really try the freebsd-isp list, as > > there are at least some people on there that > > have > > a clue. Although even Ted's resume looks good > > on > > paper, so you really can't tell. Incompetence > > is > > widespread. > > > > DT > > To sooth the nerves of the OP, the truth about > this is that it might work and it might not. > Ted's assertion that all ISPs do ingress address > filtering is simply wrong. I will concede this because of all the ISP's in the world, chances are that there is at least 1 that is run so incompetently, connected to a backbone network that is also unbelievably incompetent, that they are not filtering. > Not even close. My > assumption that none do isn't right either. Finally you are admitting that antispoofing filtering is a reality. I am glad to see that. However, you are wrong when you IMPLY that antispoofing access lists are not widespread. Anti spoof lists have a long history. Why even as far back as 1997 Cisco was unofficially offering to assist ISP's to put them in, this was in response to land.c, see here: http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/apnic-talk/archive/1997/11/msg00002.html Then in 2000, the IETF decided to codify the requirements for this in the following RFC's: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2827.txt ftp://ftp.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3013.txt We also saw then a pledge from the 9 founders of the Internet Security Alliance (http://www.isalliance.org/) to institute antispoofing on their networks, that article is here: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-518743.html We also saw calls for this from SANS: http://www.sans.org/dosstep/index.php and that gadfly, Steve Gibson: http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm This was 5 years ago. Today, the practice is firmly established, Cisco provides instructions for it: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_white_paper09186a00801a 1a55.shtml and the US Department of Homeland Security has recommended it: http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/NIAC_HardeningInternetPaper_Jan05.pdf and yes, these are the same people that have installed the black boxes that the NSA has used to electronically eavesdrop on the Internet without a search warrant, as was just reported a week or so ago in the NYT, and caused Congress to kill the extension of the Patriot Act. So don't think that those large networks aren't listening to the Feds - by contrast they are actively helping the Feds to spy on us!!! To assert as Danial is doing that they aren't following the Feds when the Feds tell them to anti-spoof is absurd. > IF > when one of your lines goes down you are still > online then you can load-balance outbound. IF you > are multi-homed or have a working backup > scenario, then you can load balance outbound. > I am afraid though that none of that is useful to the OP who wanted to know if he could shoestring load balance to 2 different ISP's for an Internet Cafe. Unless I am quite mistaken, Internet Cafe's are mainly inbound bandwidth consumers. > There is much discussion on the trade-offs of > ingress address filtering, and many believe its > the old "cut off your nose to spite your face". There WAS much discussion about 5 years ago when the Land worm hit, as I recall. There is very little today. Anyone authoratative strongly recommends it, and I know that some neworks are even now requiring ISP customers to do it. MANY isp's (such as the one I work for) automatically setup ingress filters on T1 routers that are placed -at the customer site- as part of our setup templates. And even the el-cheapo DSL routers that are network address translators, those devices won't translate traffic coming into their LAN ports that is spoofed. All Cisco routers in fact when you setup NAT on them you must define the inside subnets to be translated - they don't just accept anything handed to them. And that's just customer edge devices which you technically cannot control since they aren't in your NOC. For inside routers in the NOC, anyone competent has filters on them. i think the last large network we connected to that didn't have tight antispoof filters was MCI North America, and they pulled out of NA a few years back. And even then I'm pretty sure they only had holes that allowed you to spoof addresses they already owned. > It reduces the cpu power of your router by > causing it to test every packet coming in, Wrong. The CPU power of your router is a constant. Access lists CONSUME some of the CPU power of your router, that is true. However, most routers have ample CPU power for an antispoofing access list. It is true that a number of years ago, when antispoofing started getting recommended, that many ISP's and networks did in fact not have routers powerful enough to run antispoof lists. I've heard about ISP's back in the dark ages even running a filtered BGP table on a Cisco 2501 ! But today there's no excuse for it. With the prices of used 7206 VXR's now, any ISP under 10,000 customers can easily get a router plenty powerful enough to filter for less money than a 10 year old used car. And as for the larger ISP's like the Earthlinks and such, those people have lots of money and are on upgrade schedules and by now have updated to powerful enough routers to do antispoofing. How do you think they spy on us, they aren't using underpowered 2501's to do that!!! > it > makes multi-homing not work, Not true, you simply adjust the access list to permit multihoming from the customers who contact you and set it up with you. > and it makes > changing addresses on a large network extremely > more difficult, in order to thwart an unlikely > event. Not true either. Many tools exist to script access lists, for example a crude but interesting one is here: http://www-users.rwth-aachen.de/jens.hektor/security/cisco-acl.html > I recommend that my customers isolate > co-location customers so when worms hit they can > find the problem easier. Few do because its > easier to have everyone on the same wire. You are really a piece of work. In another thread you were railing against corporate admins using Windows terminal server as not being innovative because they can't do "what the real men do" and protect their Windows desktops because it's too hard for them - and here your defending lazy ass dumbshits who aren't even following your own recomendations? > My > cable company, for example, changes their > networking scheme every few months, and if they > had to change ingress filters on 100s of routers > manually it would be ridiculously difficult to > do. Your cable company probably has a Class B assigned from ARIN and is almost certainly NOT changing it's aggregated network block assigned from the numbering authority "every few months" Like everyone else, they can filter with a single statement permitting the aggregated block, they do not need to break out the filtering into every little itty-bitty route if they are that lazy that they can't bestir themselves to use a script like what I posted the URL to. > So they don't address filter. > So they are stupid - why are you using them then? > Ted is somehow in denial that 100s of people load > balance to different destinations. Since he > doesn't know the terms (such as round-robin, etc) > you can be sure he's never done any of it. The > simple truth is that you have to try things. You > never know what your upstream is doing. DSL is a > strange animal that requires muxes in often very > complicated meshes. If you can move your default > router to your "other" router then you are likely > not filtered. > Much more likely is that you didn't bother to read the instructions on your DSL or cable router and the things are still translating and you don't even realize it. If you really want to see if your provider is incompetent in this way, you can use a tool like the following: http://www.csm.ornl.gov/~dunigan/oci/spoof.html That will tell you if your able to spoof. > There are many issues more important than > address-spoofing, such as stability and > performance. Neither of which your going to find on a network that permits unfettered spoofing. If the network is that badly managed on a simple thing like that, it's going to be badly managed on a lot of other things too. > I have customers that are so > disorganized that they can't isolate any known > address group to any specific router, and others > that require that you register your MAC address > with them or nothing will work at all. You can't > postulate what your situation is. You have to do > testing and figure out what you can and can't do. And you also have to know enough to know the difference between the proper way to do something and a cheap hack that is unsupported, and might stop working without warning. > The more you know about how things REALLY work, > the more innovative you can be in your > implementation. > While I don't hold with Steve Gibson's chicken little approach to everything, he did have a good quote (probably stolen from somewhere else) on his site that I linked to above: "the days of an Internet based upon mutual trust among interconnected networks has passed" Go ahead and be innovative all you want, but be responsible too. The "big boy" networks that Danial seems to be so fond of ARE responsible, if not for purely altruistic reasons, it is due to the threat of ending up like the AGIS network - bankrupt because of defending spammers. Danial, it is really amazing you seem to think so many of them out there aren't responsible, and it is rather incredible that you are going so far as to advocate against being responsible - by dragging up hoary old excuses for not anti-spoofing - if you really are an Internet consultant, I really hope you are telling your customers to anti-spoof filter, if you aren't you are very, very irresponsible. It is no wonder you don't want to put your real name on anything your posting. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 03:29:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B90916A422 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BB243D5E for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:29:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5155D78; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:29:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33218-10; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:29:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4F75C80; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:29:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B2069B.2000302@mac.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:29:31 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20051227211433.J1087@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20051227211433.J1087@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Load Balancing": How Busy are the servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:29:27 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > 1. What variables on a server should be monitored to determine how busy > a server is? For instance, I've always been taugth that 'loadavg' is > not an indication of how busy a server is, since a high loadavg on a > single CPU server might be an overloaded server, but moderately loaded > on a dual CPU server ... If the load average is greater than the number of CPU's, it's likely that adding another CPU would improve throughput. If the load average is more than twice the # of CPU's it's extremely likeing that adding more CPUs would improve throughput. > disk i/o, cpu usage, ethernet throughput ... what else? The primary resources are CPU, memory, and I/O. If you measure the ones you've listed and pay attention to the VM stats, you should have a starting point. Don't forget to pay attention to running out of disk space, SysV shmem semaphores, and anything else which is being used by the tasks being run. > 2. Are there any tools that I can run to give me a point in time > "summary" of how busy a server is based on these several factors? "vmstat 5" and "iostat 5" come pretty close, but you have to calibrate some of the I/O measurements it returns against the maximum throughput possible for each specific system. > Basically, I'd like to keep track of multiple servers and be able to say > "this server is running >75% of capacity, time to upgrade or move things > off of it" ... if its possible ... ? Take a look at Big Brother, www.bb4.org?, it will at least give warnings for high load average, disk space, and so forth. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 04:11:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB8E16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:11:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0CF43D4C for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:11:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9565DC9; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:11:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78921-05; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:11:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BD15C56; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:11:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B21084.1070102@mac.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:11:48 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Imran Imtiaz References: <200512270458.jBR4wnqD084238@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> In-Reply-To: <200512270458.jBR4wnqD084238@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ker.ipc.maxpipekva error again and again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:11:37 -0000 Imran Imtiaz wrote: > I am getting the following messages again and again, why it is accuring and how can I correct and track it? > Dec 27 00:48:00 darkstar kernel: kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see tuning(7) You might look at ps or top for lots of stuck processes generated by something which are blocking. Basicly, the system has a limit on how much memory can be used to connect stages of pipelines between processes. Take a look at "sysctl kern.ipc", or more specificly: "sysctl kern.ipc | grep kva" -- -Chuck PS: "man tuning" is likely to be informative. :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 04:48:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40E916A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6A543D58 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA0F5DC9; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:48:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02591-04; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:48:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B96B5C9C; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:48:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B21933.8020003@mac.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:48:51 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Imran Imtiaz , freebsd-questions References: <200512270458.jBR4wnqD084238@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> <43B21084.1070102@mac.com> <000b01c60b69$02dbaae0$8c4a3bca@abc> In-Reply-To: <000b01c60b69$02dbaae0$8c4a3bca@abc> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: Subject: Re: ker.ipc.maxpipekva error again and again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:48:45 -0000 Imran Imtiaz wrote: > actually i am running some graph generating scripts this is because of > them but it doesn't happened all the time so how can i correct it ? Adjust or serialize your scripts, or recompile the kernel with more KVA allocated to pipes. See the Handbook about rebuilding the kernel, and "man tuning". -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 05:28:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8495F16A41F; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:28:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from mx1.mra.co.id (mx1.mra.co.id [202.51.19.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADEA43D4C; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:28:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CCF72456; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:09:57 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx1.mra.co.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24359-10; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:09:56 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [172.16.0.228] (unknown [172.16.0.228]) by mx1.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB6F7246F; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:09:56 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <43B0F8B4.6030701@mra.co.id> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:17:56 +0700 From: Beastie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051013 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mra.co.id Cc: Subject: ipwcontrol load firmware on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:28:14 -0000 Dear lists; I tried to do network auto configuration by DHCP with integrated Intel Pro Wireless 2100 wlan device (ipw2100). I have trouble when load firmware with ipwcontrol on boot. Initialitation script (/usr/local/etc/rc.d/ipw.sh) always execute after network init (specify in rc.conf). Is there any way to make "ipwcontrol -i ipw0 -f /usr/local/share/ipw-firmware/ipw.fw" command execute before network init. ? Please help. regards reza From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 05:35:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7FE16A420 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:35:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [65.122.236.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E6F43D46 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:35:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA16578 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:35:39 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:35:39 -0700 (MST) From: Brett Glass Message-Id: <200512280535.WAA16578@lariat.net> To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Sendmail X port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:35:44 -0000 I don't see Sendmail X available as a port or package. I'm interested in trying this version because it's the first to eliminate the horribly cryptic system of m4 macros, "classes", and address parsing rules that configured earlier versions. Is there a reason why it's not available as a package or port for FreeBSD? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 05:45:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF3116A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1932043D49 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:45:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBS5mTP87076; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:48:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Brent" , Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:45:07 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20051226130206.M64642@bmyster.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: backups spanning tapes help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:45:20 -0000 Hi Brent, The BSD tar that is in FreeBSD cannot span tapes, you have to use gtar. (GNU tar) the old original tar in FreeBSD was gtar, then they renamed tar to gtar, and added in a BSD tar (that is unencumbered code) man gtar should tell all you need. Also a note on your 8MM, 14gb compression is a salesman's fantasy. I think they use test files that must contain 100,000 binary 1's to get those numbers. Your more realistic to expect about 10GB with the tape hardware compression or even 9GB. Also, files like mp3's and jpgs are already compressed so you gain nothing with hardware compression on those. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Brent >Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 5:05 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: backups spanning tapes help > > >We use a freebsd box that has a old 8mm library drive attached >that we use for >backups..my question is these tapes hold 7gigs native or 14 gig >compressed >..One i cant seem to get compression going so i was wondering >how do you span >tapes using tar ? Unless theres another way to do this > >thank you for your help & Merry Christmas > >-- >Brent Bailey CCNA >Bmyster LLC > > >--RIP Brother Dime-- > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.7/214 - Release Date: >12/23/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 05:52:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE27616A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:52:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E9243D45 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:52:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so1418932nzo for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:52:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=BX9mR/mOFiIhcSzVm+z3AsJIWDjajX0o6O+NQYD8kQbD2vx/+RxGNNVDpNr1w/HLxvmp36w/8MznN9iMDk0YEg+A3/XPUvRm6ifUuq3c2x4UjPZ74V2w9VsQsBdYzlYsFQQVgZoe3ruyXEm+pwzQzoocfR48gtNYBcGsI/cD2XM= Received: by 10.36.41.1 with SMTP id o1mr4967265nzo; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:52:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id r1sm2215489nzd.2005.12.27.21.52.45; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:52:47 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:55:31 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512281355.31738.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Subject: pkg_delete question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:52:49 -0000 hello, all I wanna delete a package that I don't want now. I know that when I use portinstall -R xxx to install it, many dependencies have been installed too. Now I wanna delete them all if they are not used by any other packages. how can I do it? can I "pkg_delete -r xxx"? thanks. -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 06:01:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09F516A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:01:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsidorov@swsoft.com) Received: from master.plesk.ru (plesk-gw.Nsk.gldn.net [194.67.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BFF43D49 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:01:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsidorov@swsoft.com) Received: from sidorov.plesk.ru (sidorov.plesk.ru [192.168.43.59]) by master.plesk.ru (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBS60xNA008455; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:01:00 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from dsidorov@swsoft.com) From: Dmitry Sidorov To: Yuan Jue In-Reply-To: <200512281355.31738.yuanjue02@gmail.com> References: <200512281355.31738.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: SWsoft Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:00:14 +0600 Message-Id: <1135749614.526.1.camel@sidorov.plesk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on master.plesk.ru host X-Antivirus-Code: 100000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_delete question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dsidorov@swsoft.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:01:04 -0000 On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:55 +0800, Yuan Jue wrote: > hello, all > > I wanna delete a package that I don't want now. I know that when I use > portinstall -R xxx to install it, many dependencies have been installed too. > Now I wanna delete them all if they are not used by any other packages. > > how can I do it? can I "pkg_delete -r xxx"? > > thanks. > yes you can, ls -al /var/db/pkg find your package name, and execute: pkg_delete -r package_name -- Dmitry Sidorov PEM QA Engineer SWsoft, Inc. E-mail: dsidorov@swsoft.com ICQ UIN: 864582 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 06:08:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F78D16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:08:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F6E43D46 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:08:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so789069nzb for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:08:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=VS/HH4UU3dIy9HdGiLeXkEI1Hue9uK6JTDI0z8UUK6XT/aowirJ9ePuJocOd5tRUuswN6pk+ReGl40QMO3AnKQz4IZ+iuB18q7EAY++4cyI5ssvIxQAIrVbZQzYABiqvo3aLr849XAF1Ntx5JGxymxk0kLHOAVK0wYLGvelpAts= Received: by 10.36.194.20 with SMTP id r20mr4934450nzf; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:08:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 19sm5111566nzp.2005.12.27.22.08.09; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:08:11 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, dsidorov@swsoft.com Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:10:54 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512281355.31738.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <1135749614.526.1.camel@sidorov.plesk.ru> In-Reply-To: <1135749614.526.1.camel@sidorov.plesk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512281410.55365.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: pkg_delete question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:08:13 -0000 On Wednesday 28 December 2005 14:00, Dmitry Sidorov wrote: > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:55 +0800, Yuan Jue wrote: > > hello, all > > > > I wanna delete a package that I don't want now. I know that when I use > > portinstall -R xxx to install it, many dependencies have been installed > > too. Now I wanna delete them all if they are not used by any other > > packages. > > > > how can I do it? can I "pkg_delete -r xxx"? > > > > thanks. > > yes you can, > ls -al /var/db/pkg > find your package name, and execute: > pkg_delete -r package_name thanks for your reply. but doesn't "pkg_delete -r xxx" use to delete all packages that depend on the xxx? what I wanna delete are those packages that xxx depend on. any ideas? -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 06:21:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D4A16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:21:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5634A43D5F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:21:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so790556nzb for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:21:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=YuaIUdfL7IsBVF5o3y+CDUAu2PgQgmtsRrifLfqi+813D+vCxIebtMqPcCANEqLXPvEWBYR6SQMlUoJ+awgWNQA0c0ula0Y7+uy1RKHqlL1/lSXSKz1L+XGc/3ApnXqU/CffNs7KvCsUYLH6SP6iR4dymDPjExxwn9LMNS9pPm4= Received: by 10.36.221.72 with SMTP id t72mr4978794nzg; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:21:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ( [71.102.22.155]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 10sm8761852nzo.2005.12.27.22.21.13; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:21:13 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:21:10 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512281355.31738.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <1135749614.526.1.camel@sidorov.plesk.ru> <200512281410.55365.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512281410.55365.yuanjue02@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512272221.11054.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Yuan Jue , dsidorov@swsoft.com Subject: Re: pkg_delete question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:21:26 -0000 On Tuesday 27 December 2005 22:10, Yuan Jue wrote: > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 14:00, Dmitry Sidorov wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:55 +0800, Yuan Jue wrote: > > > hello, all > > > > > > I wanna delete a package that I don't want now. I know that when I use > > > portinstall -R xxx to install it, many dependencies have been installed > > > too. Now I wanna delete them all if they are not used by any other > > > packages. > > > > > > how can I do it? can I "pkg_delete -r xxx"? > > > > > > thanks. > > > > yes you can, > > ls -al /var/db/pkg > > find your package name, and execute: > > pkg_delete -r package_name > > thanks for your reply. > but doesn't "pkg_delete -r xxx" use to delete all packages > that depend on the xxx? what I wanna delete are those packages > that xxx depend on. any ideas? To delete ports that none depend on try: sysutils/portmanager portmanager -slid -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 06:51:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F2B16A420 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:51:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C6B43D49 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:51:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBS6sTP87356; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:54:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Malcolm Kay" , Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:51:08 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <200512281024.38359.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Importance: Normal Cc: rod person , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:51:26 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Malcolm Kay >Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 3:55 PM >To: danial_thom@yahoo.com >Cc: rod person; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: BSD Question's. > > >Cadence have a wide range of products some of which >run on Windows platforms. But you will be struggling >to do much with Full Custom on XP. > >There are some alternatives offered on FreeBSD -- >admittedly inferior to the top Cadence products but >also at less than 10% of the licensing costs. > >I thought the discussion was about desktop software >not business software; but even so if your business >is IC design then I would think a good CAD suite was >pretty essential. > Frankly, Malcolm, I find it far more interesting to learn about the niche software that runs poorly on Windows and well on UNIX. Talking about programs like Acrobat that everyone uses is a pretty dull and worn out subject. We all know Acrobat works better on Windows, ho hum, can we please move on? As you so eloquently reminded us here, not every task done on a computer is done with the top 20 most popular programs in the world. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 06:58:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991F916A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:58:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADE643D49 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:58:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1ErVG9-0009Kn-An for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:58:05 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1ErVFb-000Op1-FR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:57:31 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id jBS6vU41095418 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:57:30 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:57:30 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051228065730.GG95195@sysadm.stc> References: <43AC309F.7000608@att.net> <20051223205231.GC2950@osiris.chen.org.nz> <43B17298.5070708@att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43B17298.5070708@att.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: Palm (Zire) and /dev/ucom0 on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:58:07 -0000 On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:58:00AM -0500, DW wrote: > I then type: > # pilot-xfer -p /dev/cuaU0 -b backup > > and I get: > > Listening to port: /dev/cuaU0 > > Please press teh HotSync button now.... Works fine for me with Palm TE2. You need press HotSync button and wait a little. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 06:59:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5FD16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:59:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB1843D6B for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:59:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 21376 invoked by uid 510); 28 Dec 2005 07:02:10 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.7/5.0):. Processed in 2.420424 secs); 28 Dec 2005 07:02:10 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.7/5.0):. Processed in 2.420424 secs Process 21369) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Dec 2005 07:02:07 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <20051227141209.A6D8.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <20051227131407.BA44.GERARD@seibercom.net> <20051227124254.6e3d2301@grokwell.org> <20051227141209.A6D8.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1135753327.21128.11.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:02:07 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:59:51 -0000 On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 19:18, Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Tuesday, December 27, 2005 1:42:54 PM > "Andrew L. Gould" > Subject: Re: Quick Install Question > Wrote these words of wisdom: > > > > > > > > Is the WinXP partition in the same computer that is running FreeBSD? Or > > is the NTFS partition a shared directory on a separate WinXP computer? > > (I was not aware that Samba could be used to read NTFS partitions > > residing on a FreeBSD computer.) > > > > The original poster wishes to dual boot WinXP and FreeBSD on the same > > computer. > > > > Andrew Gould > > > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** > On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: > > Actually, there are three computers. One is running FreeBSD 5.4 and the > other two have WinXP Pro installed. I networked all three together. The > WinXP systems are using the NTFS format. Samba can read and write to > both of the WinXP machines without any problems. > > I really do not know if this is germane to a dual boot system however. > It probably is not since WinXP would not actually be running when > FreeBSD was in this type of configuration. > > Fat32 is really a poor file system when compared to NTFS. It is too bad > that he is unable to get a second machine and use FreeBSD on it instead > of dual booting. > > Just my 2¢. Gerhard, Just to clear up a point. In your case, Samba is not writing to NTFS. it is handling the communications between the 2 operating systems using the SMB protocol. The individual OS' handle to filing system input/outputs. The issue with FreeBSD reading and writing to NTFS directly is different. There is a driver that will allow FreeBSD to read NTFS, but because of the complexities of NTFS writing to it is dificult and whilst possible can cause the NTFS partition to become unreadable by XP. For info the best way of setting up dual booting of FreeBSD and XP is to use 3 partitions, 1 for XP using NTFS, 1 for FreeBSD and a 3rd Fat32 partition for data transfer. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 07:02:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E2416A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:02:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA47D43D7F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:01:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1488765nzo for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:01:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Ia+J1oHefqRtQotoLAfEeCJ2NclOypQl5qTs8cM79JgMQ5dcYEaUaGSFWqR/c4WdEj2ubNg6zyuWJgMdOiXFrqwSKgUh2vF381xDeezbDr4anyAuM+x4ubag+Yo1HWk7hF+S3ZmzxEXZe9ypBXoc0muOVa2y010rL7jLHjCrvUw= Received: by 10.36.79.16 with SMTP id c16mr5155779nzb; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:01:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 8sm8781832nzn.2005.12.27.23.01.51; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:01:53 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:04:33 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512252354.05026.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260036.00517.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512260209.44561.kjelderg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512260209.44561.kjelderg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512281504.33958.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Kjeldergaard Subject: Re: Desktop Note on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:02:04 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 01:09, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 01:35, Yuan Jue wrote: > > On Monday 26 December 2005 00:15, you wrote: > > > On Monday 26 December 2005 00:54, Yuan Jue wrote: > > > > hello, all > > > > > > > > is there any software that like Rainlender on Windows? I need to make > > > > some notes sometimes, and i think it would be much better if the > > > > notes could be always shown on the desktop to remind me. Kontact is > > > > great, but not at this point :( > > > > > > Do you perhaps mean something like kde's knotes? > > > > thanks for your reply. knotes does its work, but not that well as > > Rainlender. I mean its look and interface. can knote be transparent? > > Sure, kwin can make any application transparent. It appears that knotes on > my system just magically is translucent, probably because it is a dock > window, but you can set this more specifically for knotes by setting > "window specific settings" for the window class knotes. Hope this helps, I have found some theme in superkaramba which exactly fulfill my demand. it is KaOrganizer. thank you all! -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 07:11:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C50D16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:11:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2633243D5E for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:11:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 21476 invoked by uid 510); 28 Dec 2005 07:14:02 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.11834 secs); 28 Dec 2005 07:14:02 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.11834 secs Process 21469) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 28 Dec 2005 07:14:01 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: Robert Ames In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1135754041.21128.18.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:14:01 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: New IDE drive in old PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:11:42 -0000 On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:12, Robert Ames wrote: > I have an old (very old) ASUS P5 motherboard running FreeBSD 5.4. > The boot disk is a 40MB Western Digital WD400 IDE drive jumpered to > only use 32MB so it can be booted from since the BIOS in this PC > (the latest and greatest) can't deal with anything larger than 32MB. > This PC is working well for me and I don't want to upgrade it. > However I would like to add a lot of disk space. So my question > is, can I go out and buy a new 300 GB (or whatever) IDE disk and > attach it to the secondary IDE controller and hope to use all 300 > GB? I will still use the old disk for booting and to hold the OS. > The new disk will be just for data. If this will "just work" how do > I configure the BIOS so the PC will boot with the large drive installed? Robert, If you had to jumper the boot disk for it to work with the BIOS of the motherboard, then the chances are that you would have to do the same with the 2nd hard drive. ISTR that ASUS produced updated BIOS' for most of their motherboards to get around this. Have a look at their website to see if there is and upgrade. There is also a area on the site for questions such as yours. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 07:38:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C272116A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:38:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EC643D46 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:38:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBS7aPpW079057 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:36:25 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBS7aLRH079056 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:36:21 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:36:21 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200512280736.jBS7aLRH079056@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ftp nologin problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:38:25 -0000 I am running ProFTPD 1.2.10 on my bsd server but the problem is that if a user don't have a shell and I've defined his shell as nologin then the ftp server does not logon and give the following error C:\Documents and Settings\Asif>ftp 192.168.0.3 Connected to 192.168.0.3. 220 ProFTPD 1.2.10 Server (ProFTPD Default Installation) [192.168.0.3] User (192.168.0.3:(none)): db.backup 331 Password required for db.backup. Password: 530 Login incorrect. Login failed. ftp> tell me how can I correct this problem cause I don't want to give user a shell. Regards, Imran Imtiaz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 07:47:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C100516A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:47:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F5C43D5F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:47:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so800563nzb for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:47:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=W9UK/FTuFfAt2Z9bfqRCDoQv0+sMXO0OFNHxKN4BXiicLtjnX0LUz72EDwUJ/31DX8wF+HRACEUcNNTOMdK33DvzDOlc/oS/CANINUHA5kFtPPPlP4gH8tJ25RN/OnAJG+T6IIX/yqsdHNCsEjjzgPGO9mOF2GbJGjDSAXZakvc= Received: by 10.36.221.72 with SMTP id t72mr5037544nzg; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from yuanjue.nc6000.org ( [59.66.138.109]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 20sm93396nzp.2005.12.27.23.47.25; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:47:30 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:50:10 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512281355.31738.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512281410.55365.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512272221.11054.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512272221.11054.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512281550.11717.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: dsidorov@swsoft.com, "Michael C. Shultz" Subject: Re: pkg_delete question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:47:31 -0000 On Wednesday 28 December 2005 14:21, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Tuesday 27 December 2005 22:10, Yuan Jue wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 14:00, Dmitry Sidorov wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:55 +0800, Yuan Jue wrote: > > > > hello, all > > > > > > > > I wanna delete a package that I don't want now. I know that when I > > > > use portinstall -R xxx to install it, many dependencies have been > > > > installed too. Now I wanna delete them all if they are not used by > > > > any other packages. > > > > > > > > how can I do it? can I "pkg_delete -r xxx"? > > > > > > > > thanks. > > > > > > yes you can, > > > ls -al /var/db/pkg > > > find your package name, and execute: > > > pkg_delete -r package_name > > > > thanks for your reply. > > but doesn't "pkg_delete -r xxx" use to delete all packages > > that depend on the xxx? what I wanna delete are those packages > > that xxx depend on. any ideas? > > To delete ports that none depend on try: > > sysutils/portmanager > > portmanager -slid thanks. it works very well :) -- Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 08:39:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE0E16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:39:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbhurtha@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB6143D46 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:39:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbhurtha@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so502058uge for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:39:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bH5Bnp99cC7GQi2Mv9W9pNDknw+6ZCdorep8KdLQSSfskGkpIinicekVqlet0++BIdSSCY/E5D8nIgz4uW+rmi+gKAZKAFdfLL4iv88d0aYKhSc1WlbGxJIHAcm3JcJtAuJf5ZV1A/uYiGOdMnmt82n8yZj9l808fa5/fFQAw6Q= Received: by 10.67.22.3 with SMTP id z3mr2546378ugi; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:40:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.237.11 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:40:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:40:45 +0000 From: Roshan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051227131407.BA44.GERARD@seibercom.net> <20051227124254.6e3d2301@grokwell.org> <20051227141209.A6D8.GERARD@seibercom.net> <1135753327.21128.11.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Subject: Re: Quick Install Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:39:35 -0000 On 12/28/05, Roshan wrote: > On 12/28/05, Robert Slade wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 19:18, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > > On Tuesday, December 27, 2005 1:42:54 PM > > > "Andrew L. Gould" > > > Subject: Re: Quick Install Question > > > Wrote these words of wisdom: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is the WinXP partition in the same computer that is running FreeBSD= ? Or > > > > is the NTFS partition a shared directory on a separate WinXP comput= er? > > > > (I was not aware that Samba could be used to read NTFS partitions > > > > residing on a FreeBSD computer.) > > > > > > > > The original poster wishes to dual boot WinXP and FreeBSD on the sa= me > > > > computer. > > > > > > > > Andrew Gould > > > > > > > > > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** > > > On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: > > > > > > Actually, there are three computers. One is running FreeBSD 5.4 and t= he > > > other two have WinXP Pro installed. I networked all three together. T= he > > > WinXP systems are using the NTFS format. Samba can read and write to > > > both of the WinXP machines without any problems. > > > > > > I really do not know if this is germane to a dual boot system however= . > > > It probably is not since WinXP would not actually be running when > > > FreeBSD was in this type of configuration. > > > > > > Fat32 is really a poor file system when compared to NTFS. It is too b= ad > > > that he is unable to get a second machine and use FreeBSD on it inste= ad > > > of dual booting. > > > > > > Just my 2=A2. > > > > Gerhard, > > > > Just to clear up a point. In your case, Samba is not writing to NTFS. i= t > > is handling the communications between the 2 operating systems using th= e > > SMB protocol. The individual OS' handle to filing system input/outputs. > > > > The issue with FreeBSD reading and writing to NTFS directly is > > different. There is a driver that will allow FreeBSD to read NTFS, but > > because of the complexities of NTFS writing to it is dificult and whils= t > > possible can cause the NTFS partition to become unreadable by XP. > > > > For info the best way of setting up dual booting of FreeBSD and XP is t= o > > use 3 partitions, 1 for XP using NTFS, 1 for FreeBSD and a 3rd Fat32 > > partition for data transfer. > > > > Rob > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" > > Hi everyone. i just want to add a little something to this discussion, about read/write from Windows boxes. You can use mount_smbfs to mount a shared resource from an SMB file server. See 'man mount_smbfs' for more info. Roshan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 09:29:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37EC16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:29:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13A643D5A for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:29:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBS9SnXh018643; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:28:50 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43B25ACB.8010209@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:28:43 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051221) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <20051227211433.J1087@ganymede.hub.org> <43B2069B.2000302@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <43B2069B.2000302@mac.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8B6881266714BDB20380B9FE" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:28:50 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1218/Mon Dec 26 13:46:59 2005 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Load Balancing": How Busy are the servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:29:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8B6881266714BDB20380B9FE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chuck Swiger wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> Basically, I'd like to keep track of multiple servers and be able to >> say "this server is running >75% of capacity, time to upgrade or move >> things off of it" ... if its possible ... ? > Take a look at Big Brother, www.bb4.org?, it will at least give warnings > for high load average, disk space, and so forth. Yep -- BB, or for my preference, Nagios is good, but by their nature they alert you to abnormal conditions -- peaks in load or traffic, failure of connectivity etc. That's important, but it doesn't really help with getting an overview of how hard a server is running over time. For that purpose I find that programs like Cacti or Cricket do much better. Essentially anything you can express as a number and that you can get a SNMP daemon to present as an OID can be graphed. Cacti comes with pre-canned queries on system load, disk space, memory usage, swap usage, number of processes, as well as graphing all of the network traffic. Adding extensions to do stuff like monitor how much work MySQL is doing is not too difficult. Not only that, it produces graphs pretty enough to convince even the pointiest-haired management. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig8B6881266714BDB20380B9FE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDslrR8Mjk52CukIwRA4KuAJ4rZXaGEoFxp46DuAAX03B8NPmrOgCeOqxK fgcmAH5E4g71sFC/Fz/HpdM= =+wud -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8B6881266714BDB20380B9FE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 10:00:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2943B16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:00:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F61B43D78 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:00:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBS9xqpH018729; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:59:52 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43B26213.5060504@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:59:47 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051221) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Imran Imtiaz References: <200512280736.jBS7aLRH079056@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> In-Reply-To: <200512280736.jBS7aLRH079056@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig98F1D657442D62F3B029AE4F" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:59:53 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1218/Mon Dec 26 13:46:59 2005 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp nologin problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:00:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig98F1D657442D62F3B029AE4F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Imran Imtiaz wrote: > I am running ProFTPD 1.2.10 on my bsd server but the problem is that if a user don't have a shell and I've defined his shell as nologin then the ftp server does not logon and give the following error > C:\Documents and Settings\Asif>ftp 192.168.0.3 > Connected to 192.168.0.3. > 220 ProFTPD 1.2.10 Server (ProFTPD Default Installation) [192.168.0.3] > User (192.168.0.3:(none)): db.backup > 331 Password required for db.backup. > Password: > 530 Login incorrect. > Login failed. > ftp> > > tell me how can I correct this problem cause I don't want to give user a shell. Yes -- in order for a user to log in successfully via FTP they need: * a user account * a valid shell (appears in /etc/shells) * not to be in the list of user accounts *denied* ftp access, confusingly kept in /etc/ftpusers I suspect it's point 2 that you are running into here. However, do not just blindly add /sbin/nologin to /etc/shells -- any user account that gets created on your system solely for the purpose of owning files or processes will probably end up with nologin as its shell. Putting nologin into /etc/shells potentially creates a back door by which those accounts can be used with FTP. Instead, take a copy of /sbin/nologin, call it /usr/local/bin/ftp-only and use that as the shell for all ftp users. Add that to /etc/shells and everything should work the way you want. If you're trying to setup a highly secure mechanism for copying files over the net for backup, then I'd counsel against using FTP at all -- it's one of those archaic 'dawn of the internet' type protocols that does nasty things like transmitting passwords over networks in plain text. Two much better alternatives are: WebDav over HTTPS -- very easy to use from the Windows desktop via the 'map network location' feature. One gotcha is that if you're using a self signed cert on your webserver then you have to click on 'examine certificate' the first time you connect to the server, and then click on 'accept this certificate' or Windows will silently refuse to map the web location. rsync or scp over ssh. On the Windows side, you'll need a SSH client, like Putty (http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/) scp is built into Putty, but adding rsync capability will need you to do a bit more work. You'll need to install rsync (Ports: net/rsync) on your FreeBSD server, plus the Cygwin environment on your windows machines ( http://www.cygwin.com/) Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig98F1D657442D62F3B029AE4F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDsmIY8Mjk52CukIwRA4PWAJ9hQ5hx4PZW7PRyIIiUUV/QLD9rCACdFDik iNfh7xj6vOiIykIwSTfbsvs= =ddxb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig98F1D657442D62F3B029AE4F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 11:10:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9B916A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:10:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lalev@sv-bg.com) Received: from mail.sv-bg.com (ns.sv-bg.com [213.222.60.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C1EE43D55 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:10:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lalev@sv-bg.com) Received: (qmail 63802 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Dec 2005 13:12:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.12?) (lalev@sv-bg.com@213.222.60.195) by mail.sv-bg.com with SMTP; 28 Dec 2005 13:12:46 -0000 Message-ID: <43B2729B.1030203@sv-bg.com> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:10:19 +0200 From: Angelin Lalev User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: qmail + vpopmail + procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:10:40 -0000 Greetings, It's been a long time since my last day as a system administrator, but recently I needed to install a qmail server for a friend. Although I had forgoten many things, I've managed to make a working netqmail 1.05 + SMTP-AUTH + TLS patch + qmail-scanner + spam-assassin + courier imap + vpopmail (mysql db) installation, following scattered trough internet documents and howto's. But now my friend's clients want all mail that is tagged as spam (in my case, prefixed with "[SPAM]" in the subject) moved to separate courier imap folder (for example .SPAM). I figured out (maybe I make error here) that I need procmail to deliver the mail to the different courier-imap folders in the Maildir. I couldn't find on the net clear algorithm that does that. (or at least I failed reproducing it). Anyone could help? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 11:45:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4F816A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:45:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com (hosting-28.42.rev.fr.colt.net [213.41.42.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B2B43D5A for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:45:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAB537608B for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:45:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (freefugu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39903-03 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:45:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.bsdmon.com (14.128.101-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.101.128.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ADB375834 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:26:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by sdf1.bsdmon.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1DDD2B853; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:25:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:25:58 +0100 From: Gilbert Cao To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051228112558.GA79302@bsdmon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE i386 Organization: BSDMon X-GPG-Key: http://www.bsdmon.com/public_key.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdmon.com Subject: Preserve date when cp over smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:45:54 -0000 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, the list. I have noticed some small problem when copying files over SMB. My samba server (port version 3.0.8,1) is running on a FreeBSD 5.4 STABLE. My samba client is running on a FreeBSD 6.0 STABLE. When I copy a single file with the cp utility, with -p flag, to a smbfs mounted directory, the modification datetime is not preserved and it is set to the current datetime : $ cp -p myfile /path/to/smbmountdir/ The same thing occurred with the tar utility : $ tar cpf - myfile | tar xpvf - -C /path/to/smbmountdir/ However, I have tried to copy the same file to the same smbfs mounted directory, with gqview (port version 2.0.1_1) and the modification datetime= is preserved. I have quickly looked into the source code of both cp and gqview, and it se= ems that cp relies on utimes(), and gqview relies on utime(). Is there any other way for the cp and tar utilities to preserve file datetime over SMB ? In the problem comes from the smbfs kernel module ? or the cp and tar utility ? In the future, I would just like to avoid loading gqview, just to copy files with preserve datetime : cp and tar seems more natural :p Regards. --=20 -------------------------------- (hika) Gilbert Cao http://www.miaouirc.com - MiaouIRC Project 2002-2003 http://www.bsdmon.com - The BSD DMON Power to serve IRC : #miaule at IRCNET Network -------------------------------- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDsnZGSyQfFTqAEpcRAj+SAJ48oy88trP35utqpGO98LwFB++mdACeLVnF GCwV8g9u8TvR+Sk1TIqFrVo= =WiJI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 12:20:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AE316A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7344E43D68 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:20:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1531395nzo for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:20:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=jaB6B/ge007h2mW0DdBr2T12MEdUb3cEZdzgoMuVmvsO7bhmemW0MgK0ORRMbK2AK3bDCV05PhL/gi6bV4hLis45OQtwUnsGqaOsA0z/az3WO2jpeVupHJl2daGWony2eUBPLDy91EMWoTtCrl1wNutM0AEme692aiuEd1GEdlA= Received: by 10.64.209.19 with SMTP id h19mr2232395qbg; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ( [71.102.22.155]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q14sm625615qbq.2005.12.28.04.20.21; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:20:22 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Yuan Jue Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:20:18 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512281355.31738.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512272221.11054.ringworm01@gmail.com> <200512281550.11717.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512281550.11717.yuanjue02@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512280420.19564.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: dsidorov@swsoft.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_delete question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:20:24 -0000 On Tuesday 27 December 2005 23:50, Yuan Jue wrote: > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 14:21, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 December 2005 22:10, Yuan Jue wrote: > > > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 14:00, Dmitry Sidorov wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:55 +0800, Yuan Jue wrote: > > > > > hello, all > > > > > > > > > > I wanna delete a package that I don't want now. I know that when I > > > > > use portinstall -R xxx to install it, many dependencies have been > > > > > installed too. Now I wanna delete them all if they are not used by > > > > > any other packages. > > > > > > > > > > how can I do it? can I "pkg_delete -r xxx"? > > > > > > > > > > thanks. > > > > > > > > yes you can, > > > > ls -al /var/db/pkg > > > > find your package name, and execute: > > > > pkg_delete -r package_name > > > > > > thanks for your reply. > > > but doesn't "pkg_delete -r xxx" use to delete all packages > > > that depend on the xxx? what I wanna delete are those packages > > > that xxx depend on. any ideas? > > > > To delete ports that none depend on try: > > > > sysutils/portmanager > > > > portmanager -slid > > thanks. it works very well :) Your welcome :) -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 12:48:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6022E16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikeala3@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay7-f18.bay7.hotmail.com [64.4.11.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216B543D58 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikeala3@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:48:03 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 67.131.237.13 by by7fd.bay7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:48:03 GMT X-Originating-IP: [61.95.65.37] X-Originating-Email: [mikeala3@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mikeala3@hotmail.com From: "Mike Esquardez" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:48:03 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Dec 2005 12:48:03.0885 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1650DD0:01C60BAC] Subject: Gnokii SMSD and Ports Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:48:04 -0000 Hello everybody. I am trying to work out how to install SMSD from ports and not having much luck. I'm jut learning FreeBSD, so my knowledge of ports is not very good. When I make, make install, it only installs Gnokii. After looking around I found the file /usr/ports/comms/gnokii/files/patch-smsd-Makefile and also README under /work/smsd. I am totally lost and confused. Google has proved not so good for this issue. ========================================== COMPILATION SMSD is not compiled by default with gnokii 'make' command. You must compile it manually by typing 'make' in smsd directory. But before SMSD compilation you must right configure gnokii (autoconf, configure). For example: (in gnokii directory) gettextize # only for CVS copies autoconf # only for CVS copies autoheader # only for CVS copies ./configure [ If you use latest Red Hat with new (0.11) gettext version ] [ run autogen.sh with configure options instead of the ] [ above commands. It will do all needed things. ] cd smsd vi Makefile (edit paths in "DB Modules" section) make make libpq.la OR make libmysql.la OR make libfile.la make install Note that you can build all of the modules (libpq, libmysql and libfile) but you should use just one. ========================================== I have installed RPM and Debs before, but I've never had to do anything other than make, make install. Can anyone be so kind enough to explain what the above instructions mean? And what the "/usr/ports/comms/gnokii/files/patch-smsd-Makefile" file is for and how to use it? Thank you very much for any help and teaching. Mik _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:07:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4EC16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:07:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCC243D53 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:07:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3C821018E for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:07:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29166-01-28 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:07:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D8259210176 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:06:59 -0500 (EST) X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBSD6wBa095656 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:07:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:07:02 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051228075334.C8C7.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: New Problem with adding X-Headers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:07:10 -0000 I recently posted about a problem I was having adding X-Headers to outgoing email using Sendmail. I used the following in the [domain].mc file. LOCAL_CONFIG HX-WARNING: This was added by to the email (example) The above example X-Header is now added to all outgoing email. The problem is that it is also added to all email that I receive. That is not what I had desired. How can I alleviate this problem. Ciao -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:13:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF9916A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:13:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@att.net) Received: from mail1.utrs.com (mail1.utrs.com [146.145.216.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9EF43D49 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:13:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@att.net) Received: from [192.168.15.102] [68.45.151.54] by mail1.utrs.com with ESMTP (SMTPD-9.00) id AF9303F8; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:13:55 -0500 Message-ID: <43B28F71.6030203@att.net> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:13:21 -0500 From: DW User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051223) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Igor Robul References: <43AC309F.7000608@att.net> <20051223205231.GC2950@osiris.chen.org.nz> <43B17298.5070708@att.net> <20051228065730.GG95195@sysadm.stc> In-Reply-To: <20051228065730.GG95195@sysadm.stc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Palm (Zire) and /dev/ucom0 on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dwinner-lists@att.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:13:30 -0000 Igor Robul wrote: >On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:58:00AM -0500, DW wrote: > > >>I then type: >># pilot-xfer -p /dev/cuaU0 -b backup >> >>and I get: >> >> Listening to port: /dev/cuaU0 >> >> Please press teh HotSync button now.... >> >> >Works fine for me with Palm TE2. You need press HotSync button and wait >a little. > > Are you pressing "HotSync" before or after "pilot-xfer"? If I do pilot-xfer first, then it fails because /dev/cuaU0 doesn't exist yet. If I hit HotSync first, /dev/cuaU0 gets created, but then pilot-xfer tells me to hit HotSync, which I already did. pilot-xfer just sits there waiting for Hotsync (already running), then HotSync on my Palm eventually times out and /dev/cuaU0 gets destroyed. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:15:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19016A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:15:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin@gish.demon.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6495243D78 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:15:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin@gish.demon.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:10989 helo=ZGISH) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Erb9c-000JgT-3y; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:15:44 +0000 From: "Kiffin Gish" To: "'Giorgos Keramidas'" Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:15:44 +0100 Message-ID: <000201c60bb0$cf554760$2101a8c0@ZGISH> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <20051228005802.GA8568@flame.pc> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: 'Dinesh Nair' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Wireless woes: upgrade 5.4 to 6.0, wi0, etc... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:15:55 -0000 Actually, I just removed it from loader.conf rather than the kernel (and having to rebuild everything all over again) and that works fine also. Thanks for the tip. -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands > -----Original Message----- > From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto:keramida@ceid.upatras.gr] > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 01:58 > To: Kiffin Gish > Cc: Dinesh Nair; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Wireless woes: upgrade 5.4 to 6.0, wi0, etc... > > > On 2005-12-27 18:13, Kiffin Gish wrote: > > Yes I have. I also added it to the loader.conf file, the kernel > > configuration file, done a buildkernel etc. but no luck. > > > > # /boot/loader.conf > > wlan_wep_load="YES" > > > > # /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > > device wlan_wep > > I think this is why you're getting the message: > > ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_wep module by hand for now > > Try removing it from your kernel config file and loading it > through loader.conf only. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:22:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CEA16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:22:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AD543D5F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA30150058 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:22:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09233-01-47 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:22:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 81EEE150059 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:22:12 -0500 (EST) X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Received: from seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBSDMCEi095989 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:22:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jBSDMCFC095986 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:22:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:22:12 -0500 (EST) From: Gerard Seibert To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20051228081309.I95953@seibercom.net> Organization: Seibercom.NET MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Unable to install Webmin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerard Seibert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:22:23 -0000 I have tried several time to install Webmin, but without success. Actually, the program does install, it just cannot be run. After installing the program, I attempted to run the setup.sh script. This is the output from that script. Script started on Wed Dec 28 08:08:38 2005 *********************************************************************** * Welcome to the Webmin setup script, version 1.250 * *********************************************************************** Webmin is a web-based interface that allows Unix-like operating systems and common Unix services to be easily administered. Installing Webmin in /usr/local/lib/webmin ... *********************************************************************** Webmin uses separate directories for configuration files and log files. Unless you want to run multiple versions of Webmin at the same time you can just accept the defaults. Config file directory [/usr/local/etc/webmin]: Log file directory [/var/log/webmin]: *********************************************************************** Webmin is written entirely in Perl. Please enter the full path to the Perl 5 interpreter on your system. Full path to perl (default /usr/bin/perl): Testing Perl ... Perl seems to be installed ok *********************************************************************** Operating system name: FreeBSD Operating system version: 5.4 *********************************************************************** Webmin uses its own password protected web server to provide access to the administration programs. The setup script needs to know : - What port to run the web server on. There must not be another web server already using this port. - The login name required to access the web server. - The password required to access the web server. - If the webserver should use SSL (if your system supports it). - Whether to start webmin at boot time. Web server port (default 10000): Login name (default admin): XXX Login password: XXXXXXXX Password again: XXXXXXXX Use SSL (y/n): y *********************************************************************** Creating web server config files.. ..done Creating access control file.. ..done Creating start and stop scripts.. ..done Copying config files.. ..done Creating uninstall script /usr/local/etc/webmin/uninstall.sh .. ..done Changing ownership and permissions .. ..done Running postinstall scripts .. ..done Attempting to start Webmin mini web server.. Segmentation fault (core dumped) ERROR: Failed to start web server! Script done on Wed Dec 28 08:09:53 2005 I have attempted to remove all traces of Webmin and reinstall, but still it fails. I even removed and reinstalled Perl, but that made no difference either. I checked, and there are no optimizatons in my /etc/make.conf file, so that should not be the cause of the problem. What else should I look into to correct this problem? -- Gerard gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:26:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE4616A420; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from secnews@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.alkar.net (mail.alkar.net [195.248.191.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A003043D46; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:26:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from secnews@oxygen.az) Received: from [213.227.193.75] (HELO [192.168.0.178]) by mail.alkar.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.9) with ESMTP id 418738980; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:26:05 +0200 Message-ID: <43B2AEB5.9080005@oxygen.az> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:26:45 +0000 From: Tofik Suleymanov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <43B1BF11.10808@oxygen.az> <1135715364.83838.36.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1135715364.83838.36.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Tofik Suleymanov , aliyevj@hotmail.com, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port tree fetch errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:26:08 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: >Tofik Suleymanov pí¹e v út 27. 12. 2005 v 22:24 +0000: > > >>My ports-supfile is: >> >>*default host=cvsup.nl.FreeBSD.org >>*default base=/var/db >>*default prefix=/usr >>*default release=cvs tag=. >>*default delete use-rel-suffix >>*default compress >>ports-all >> >>i do: >> >>cvsup -g -z -L 2 /etc/ports-supfile >> >>and get this: >> >>Updating collection ports-all/cvs >>Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/boost/pkg-plist": >>Input/output error >>Cannot calculate checksum for >>"/usr/ports/devel/clint/files/patch-python.h": Input/output error >>Cannot calculate checksum for >>"/usr/ports/devel/crossgo32-djgpp2/pkg-plist": Input/output error >> Checkout ports/devel/Makefile >>Cannot calculate checksum for "/usr/ports/devel/elib/files/patch-aa": >>Input/output error >> >> > >Can you read the content of those files? I'd bet you got either >corrupted filesystem, or your hard drive is dying. > > > The problem was in my hard disk.Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:27:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E358A16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:27:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: from larfur.svaka.net (larfur.svaka.net [213.176.155.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6087F43D75 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:27:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: (from root@localhost) by larfur.svaka.net (MX.SVAKA.NET) id jBSDRRgq018490 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:27:27 GMT (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: from ipfw.ecweb.local (ipfw.ec.is [213.220.85.70]) by larfur.svaka.net (mx1.svaka.net) with ESMTP id jBSDRLHL018236 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:27:26 GMT (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: from ec.is (postur.ecweb.local [192.168.25.11]) by ipfw.ecweb.local (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBSDUdx5023602 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:30:39 GMT (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:32:44 -0000 Message-ID: <636A75F5E9CA8741A3136582949F95876E9E25@postur.ecweb.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? Thread-Index: AcYLsy71UmWzGElvS5WrqdVsiRCnRQ== From: "Gestur A. Grjetarsson" To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-91.1 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_70_80, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS,USER_IN_WHITELIST scanned=Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:27:26 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on larfur.svaka.net X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1218/Mon Dec 26 13:46:59 2005 on larfur.svaka.net X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1218/Mon Dec 26 13:46:59 2005 on ipfw.ecweb.local X-Virus-Status: Clean X-scanner: Scanned by Xamime-LT 0.1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:27:57 -0000 Hi =20 I have IBM Blade with Qlogic 2312 adapters using DS400 SAN =20 now I have learned that after over 10 years of good FreeBSD experience = on various sorts of hardware, I can't use FreeBSD anymore as it does'nt = work on IBM Blade. I have read alot on this problem trying to solve this problem and done = alot of testing and hacking but without any progress. =20 so I have two questions: =20 is FreeBSD going to support IBM Blade? =20 if it is going to support and work on IBM Blade, can you give me an = estimation on when it will be ready to run on IBM Blade? =20 kve=F0ja Gestur Iceland From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:29:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F313316A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:29:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2AE43D77 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:29:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuanjue02@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so1477468nzo for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:29:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=UubbXP68SS1FHwcIKCWq9W6ZUhUZ9w3BiLgTMRMxEGN/dbKaXxxdU3RBrDw3aifTK+RDyw3eR7VimsSCojHrcubG+PEDnWolmLkj371b1EWUfP7H3m9FqlrAbJLmncv41bLWfseus9OWGljOchTZdzJ2q0hE/QJWoZ38CQLStZE= Received: by 10.36.113.20 with SMTP id l20mr5293766nzc; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:29:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?166.111.123.176? ( [166.111.123.176]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm588119nzo.2005.12.28.05.29.27; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 05:29:29 -0800 (PST) From: Yuan Jue Organization: Tsinghua UNIV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:32:12 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512261107.45871.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AFB052.9070005@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <43AFB052.9070005@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512282132.13055.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:29:49 -0000 On Monday 26 December 2005 16:56, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Yuan Jue wrote: > > On Sunday 25 December 2005 23:15, Erik N=F8rgaard wrote: > >>Yuan Jue wrote: > >>>one more question > >>>since I use a fixed IP address in my dormitory and a dynamic IP address > >>>in the classroom or library, i need to change my local NIC configure > >>> from time to time. In fact, I use the fixed IP address as my default > >>> setting, which is as follows: > >>> > >>>what is the right way to do it? or is there any better solution for my > >>>situation? > >> > >>Try to take a look at dhclient.conf(5) and dhclient(8) and set all > >>interfaces to be configured with dhcp. I think it should be posible to > >>configure default values so there is something to fall back on if a > >>lease is not obtained. > >> > >>Note that dhclient is new in FBSD 6, this is also why you had to take > >>down the other interface. The old dhclient would reset all dhcp > >>configured interfaces, the new doesn't, which is quite neat because > >>usually you would have the two interfaces connected to /different/ > >>networks. > > > > thanks for your explanations about DHCP in FreeBSD 6.0, although I > > still cannot find a way to config dhclient.conf to solve my problem :) > > Of course I guess you read the man-page, but maybe you didn't see this: > yes, i do > The dhclient.conf file can be used to configure the behaviour of the > client in a wide variety of ways: protocol timing, information > requested from the server, information required of the server, > defaults to use if the server does not provide certain information, > values with which to override information provided by the server, or > values to prepend or append to information provided by the server. > The configuration file can also be preinitialized with addresses to > use on networks that do not have DHCP servers. > > It appears you can set some default values: > > default { [option declaration] [, ... option declaration] } > If for some set of options the client should use the value sup- > plied by the server, but needs to use some default value if no > value was supplied by the server, these values can be defined > in the default statement. > > I would assume that if you set defaults this way, defaults will also > take place if no lease is obtained at all - at least that would be very > usefull. Something like this I guess: > > interface bge0 { > default { > fixed-address your-fixed-ip-here; > subnet-mask your-fixed-subnet-mask-here; > ... > } > } > sorry, I still don't quite get what you mean. it seems my default setting is this though it is not written in dhclient.conf. > You might want to toggle timeout so defaults take effect faster. > > If both interfaces are configured with dhcp then dhclient will > unconfigure the interface if there is no connection be it wired or > wireless and the configuration of the working interface should take effec= t. how can I configure the wireless interface to use DHCP in dhclient.conf? like as follows? interface ath0 { default { script "/etc/dhclient-script"; } } =20 looking forward more explanations thanks =2D-=20 Best Regards. Yuan Jue From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:37:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2993A16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:37:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E25943D49 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:37:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 10293 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 13:37:21 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 13:37:21 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B9CE728423; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:37:20 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Kenneth W Cochran References: <200512251715.MAA16909536@shell.TheWorld.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Dec 2005 08:37:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200512251715.MAA16909536@shell.TheWorld.com> Message-ID: <44ek3xny0f.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetch(1) vs browser download fails comparison X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:37:23 -0000 Kenneth W Cochran writes: > How might a file retrieved/downloaded by fetch(1) differ from the > same file downloaded by a web browser (in this case mozilla & > firefox)? Specifically, if I download the free version of > ZoneAlarm for Windows (about 10mb) by each of these methods, I > get the file(s) and they're both the same length, but they fail > comparison, both by cmp(1) and by differing md5 hashes. As a > counterexample, fetching OpenOffice (some 80mb or so) works fine > & hash-verifies correctly. This same behavior is with both > 4.10-stable and 5.4-release. Ideas? Well, one of the differing downloads is wrong and the other is right. Figuring out which is which would at least tell you which program is downloading things incorrectly. Also look at the download URLs; the download that works correctly either way is probably using a different protocol than the one that is incorrect, and it would be useful to know which one is having problems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:45:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A35016A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:45:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1557743D55 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:45:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20719 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 13:45:07 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 13:45:07 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A641A28423; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:45:06 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Aaron Peterson References: <95550eab0512270731v31303cfbw9889f0e311872a5c@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Dec 2005 08:45:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <95550eab0512270731v31303cfbw9889f0e311872a5c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44acelnxnh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: pf, pfil hooks and if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:45:08 -0000 Aaron Peterson writes: > I was reading about the new if_bridge driver, and the ability of any > packet filter to interface with it that uses pfil hooks. But I can't > seem to find any documentation that says whether pf is such a packet > filter? Would someone enlighten me if pf is useable with the new > if_bridge driver? $ grep 'pfil\.h' /usr/scratch/ncvs/src/sys/contrib/pf/*/* /usr/scratch/ncvs/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf_ioctl.c,v:#include $ So, the answer is "yes." -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:50:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF2E16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:50:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.alkar.net (mail.alkar.net [195.248.191.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5886A43D58 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:50:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from [213.227.193.75] (HELO [192.168.0.178]) by mail.alkar.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.9) with ESMTP id 418752007; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:50:40 +0200 Message-ID: <43B2B479.8010905@oxygen.az> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:51:21 +0000 From: Tofik Suleymanov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ho@xer" References: <409829723.20051228012430@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <409829723.20051228012430@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:50:43 -0000 ho@xer wrote: >Good morning ! >Sorry for my bad English. I'm write from Russia. I have some problem >with installing FreeBSD 6 amd64 ! You my last chance ! No one dont >give me a answer for my question. >I put CD to cdrom and after some second I press 1 to install default >settings. After some second I see that > >........ >Vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 >Timecounter "TSC" frequency 221134344311z quality 800 >Timecounter tuck every 1.000 msec > > >What's wrong what I do wrong ?? Please say !! >Thank s ! Good bye ! > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Try to boot with ACPI disabled. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:54:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C00716A420 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:54:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D460243D88 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:54:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2D02E048; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:54:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43B298FC.4030002@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:54:04 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051214) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuan Jue References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512261107.45871.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AFB052.9070005@locolomo.org> <200512282132.13055.yuanjue02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200512282132.13055.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:54:21 -0000 Yuan Jue wrote: >>It appears you can set some default values: >> >> default { [option declaration] [, ... option declaration] } >> If for some set of options the client should use the value sup- >> plied by the server, but needs to use some default value if no >> value was supplied by the server, these values can be defined >> in the default statement. >> >>I would assume that if you set defaults this way, defaults will also >>take place if no lease is obtained at all - at least that would be very >>usefull. Something like this I guess: >> >> interface bge0 { >> default { >> fixed-address your-fixed-ip-here; >> subnet-mask your-fixed-subnet-mask-here; >> ... >> } >> } >> > > sorry, I still don't quite get what you mean. it seems my default setting > is this though it is not written in dhclient.conf. > > how can I configure the wireless interface to use DHCP in dhclient.conf? > like as follows? The dhclient.conf does not contain any interface configuration values unless you write it. dhcp automatically reads dhclient.conf on startup, so you just need to enable dhcp for the interfaces you want configured. In rc.conf insert interface_ath0="DHCP" interface_bge0="DHCP" Create dhclient.conf like this interface ath0 { default { ... the default configuration for your wireless nic ... } } interface bge0 { default { ... the default configuration for your wired nic ... } } No need to mention any scripts in dhclient.conf. In the default configuration you need to specify at least: ip address, netmask, router and nameserver, see dhclient.conf(5) for the names of those variables. You only need to create an interface specific section if you need to configure the nic with values other than those provided by the dhcp server. If your ath0 is always configured with dhcp (as I understood) and you are happy with that, no need to make that section in the dhclient.conf - or keep it empty. Then run # /etc/rc.d/netif restart Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:54:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF24E16A420 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:54:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from secnews@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.alkar.net (mail.alkar.net [195.248.191.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5429143D97 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:54:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from secnews@oxygen.az) Received: from [213.227.193.75] (HELO [192.168.0.178]) by mail.alkar.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.9) with ESMTP id 418753824; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:54:25 +0200 Message-ID: <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:55:07 +0000 From: Tofik Suleymanov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eoghan References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> In-Reply-To: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:54:48 -0000 eoghan wrote: > Hello > Im wondering how to tell freeBSD about my 2 dvd drives. k3b > automatically detects them but it hasnt found either. > Thanks > Eoghan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Post your dmesg output here. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 13:59:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B1E16A429 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:59:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D636543D82 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:59:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id jBSDxg9L006054; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:59:42 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5FCE91178B; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:58:29 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:58:29 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Yuan Jue Message-ID: <20051228135829.GA27810@flame.pc> References: <200512251530.21898.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <200512261107.45871.yuanjue02@gmail.com> <43AFB052.9070005@locolomo.org> <200512282132.13055.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512282132.13055.yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:59:51 -0000 On 2005-12-28 21:32, Yuan Jue wrote: > how can I configure the wireless interface to use DHCP in dhclient.conf? > like as follows? > > interface ath0 { > default { > script "/etc/dhclient-script"; > } > } You don't. An interface is not configured to use DHCP by modifying "dhclient.conf". The dhclient.conf file is used by dhclient to find out *options* for interfaces that are configured to use "DHCP" in the "/etc/rc.conf" file. The rc.conf file is the one you have to edit & make sure that it contains something like: ifconfig_ath0="DHCP" Then, when dhclient *is* started for 'ath0' it will read the file /etc/dhclient.conf looking for a matching set of options. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 14:13:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E92E16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:13:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lloyd.peterson@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC57B43D55 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lloyd.peterson@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so991898wxc for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:13:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lyxwETptsPYtz6x/tcyVCPKSF9/ZcOkK8T3yt5HKeesbiGUPM3vqd9QlHtCSXPUvI+89nPR9rN+BIr6T1Rwy4gJTvXckS3BiKw1W/b64TUWpkCUZW2EnLhxV+4WepM40oE+/PKnijel5Skhp2oH43F+PIg6U5x6d7O+kp5olLOU= Received: by 10.70.89.3 with SMTP id m3mr8078852wxb; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.62.15 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:13:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <95550eab0512280613gf48a1fawd054b1b0b2594346@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:13:54 -0500 From: Aaron Peterson To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <44acelnxnh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <95550eab0512270731v31303cfbw9889f0e311872a5c@mail.gmail.com> <44acelnxnh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: pf, pfil hooks and if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:13:56 -0000 On 28 Dec 2005 08:45:06 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Aaron Peterson writes: > > > I was reading about the new if_bridge driver, and the ability of any > > packet filter to interface with it that uses pfil hooks. But I can't > > seem to find any documentation that says whether pf is such a packet > > filter? Would someone enlighten me if pf is useable with the new > > if_bridge driver? > > > $ grep 'pfil\.h' /usr/scratch/ncvs/src/sys/contrib/pf/*/* > /usr/scratch/ncvs/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf_ioctl.c,v:#include > $ > > So, the answer is "yes." Thanks, I think it's likely I would not have figured that out on my own :-) Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 14:27:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5B616A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:27:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B564B43D62 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:27:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 13849 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 14:27:27 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 14:27:27 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 99ECA28423; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:27:26 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Brett Glass References: <200512280535.WAA16578@lariat.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Dec 2005 09:27:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200512280535.WAA16578@lariat.net> Message-ID: <441wzxnvox.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail X port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:27:34 -0000 Brett Glass writes: > I don't see Sendmail X available as a port or package. I'm interested in trying > this version because it's the first to eliminate the horribly cryptic system of > m4 macros, "classes", and address parsing rules that configured earlier versions. > Is there a reason why it's not available as a package or port for FreeBSD? Well, it's still missing a lot of functionality that you need in a FreeBSD system (such as the ability to actually deliver or submit messages), so it's more of a challenge to port properly than one would think. That's probably why it's still considered alpha software. It builds easily enough, though. And the configuration sure is a lot simpler (at the expense of some very powerful capabilities that were very rarely used). So it's not as though there is some reason somebody is trying to keep it *out* of the ports system. I figure it shouldn't be too hard to assemble a reasonably working port for it. You could use existing ports to provide the missing functionality; mail/mini_sendmail for submission and maybe procmail would be able to handle delivery. Then you need to add a bunch of users and groups for the individual daemons to run as. I'm not sure how you best do that when there isn't really a standard for the UID/GID values to use, but brute force would probably work okay for alpha-quality software. Be well. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 14:38:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C531716A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:38:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4DB43D7D for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:38:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 26245 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 14:38:46 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 14:38:46 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7C1D028423; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:38:45 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Aaron Peterson References: <95550eab0512270731v31303cfbw9889f0e311872a5c@mail.gmail.com> <44acelnxnh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <95550eab0512280613gf48a1fawd054b1b0b2594346@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Dec 2005 09:38:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <95550eab0512280613gf48a1fawd054b1b0b2594346@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44wthpmglm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: pf, pfil hooks and if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:38:51 -0000 Aaron Peterson writes: > On 28 Dec 2005 08:45:06 -0500, Lowell Gilbert > wrote: > > Aaron Peterson writes: > > > > > I was reading about the new if_bridge driver, and the ability of any > > > packet filter to interface with it that uses pfil hooks. But I can't > > > seem to find any documentation that says whether pf is such a packet > > > filter? Would someone enlighten me if pf is useable with the new > > > if_bridge driver? > > > > > > $ grep 'pfil\.h' /usr/scratch/ncvs/src/sys/contrib/pf/*/* > > /usr/scratch/ncvs/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf_ioctl.c,v:#include > > $ > > > > So, the answer is "yes." > > Thanks, I think it's likely I would not have figured that out on my own :-) That was the condensed version. ;-) I was also checking on the configuration, but it looks like the if_bridge(4) manual page is all you need. I didn't *try* it, however, so I can't guarantee I caught all of the important points. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 14:41:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F33E16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:41:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360F943D70 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:41:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 4685 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2005 01:41:35 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 4583, pid: 4595, t: 3.7122s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (194.125.95.46) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 01:41:32 +1100 In-Reply-To: <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:41:30 +0000 To: Tofik Suleymanov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:41:41 -0000 On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:55, Tofik Suleymanov wrote: > eoghan wrote: > >> Hello >> Im wondering how to tell freeBSD about my 2 dvd drives. k3b >> automatically detects them but it hasnt found either. >> Thanks >> Eoghan >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > Post your dmesg output here. > I have copied it below, thanks: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Dec 4 17:43:10 UTC 2005 root@nathaniel:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1400MHz (1395.76-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf07 Stepping = 7 Features=0x3febf9ff real memory = 402157568 (383 MB) avail memory = 384102400 (366 MB) npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 3 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link4: on acpi0 pci_link5: on acpi0 pci_link6: on acpi0 pci_link7: irq 9 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xefffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 fwohci0: port 0xec80-0xecff mem 0xff1ff800-0xff1fffff irq 10 at device 8.0 on pci2 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:06:00:00:99:d9:eb fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant sbp0: on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) pci2: at device 10.0 (no driver attached) pci2: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe880-0xe8ff mem 0xff1ff400-0xff1ff47f irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci2 miibus0: on xl0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:b0:d0:e7:e9:7d isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 31.2 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) uhci1: port 0xff60-0xff7f irq 9 at device 31.4 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xca7ff,0xca800-0xcbfff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1395762544 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: FAILURE - SET_MULTI status=51 error=4 ad0: 19470MB at ata0-master UDMA100 ad1: 78167MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 acd1: DVDR at ata1-slave UDMA33 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 14:46:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B5C16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:46:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D475B43D78 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:46:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 1432 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 14:46:06 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 14:46:05 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1964E28423; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:46:05 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Angelin Lalev References: <43B2729B.1030203@sv-bg.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Dec 2005 09:46:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43B2729B.1030203@sv-bg.com> Message-ID: <44slsdmg9e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qmail + vpopmail + procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:46:11 -0000 Angelin Lalev writes: > It's been a long time since my last day as a system administrator, > but recently I needed to install a qmail server for a friend. > Although I had forgoten many things, I've managed to make > a working netqmail 1.05 + SMTP-AUTH + TLS patch + > qmail-scanner + spam-assassin + courier imap + vpopmail (mysql db) > installation, following scattered trough internet documents and > howto's. > But now my friend's clients want all mail that is tagged as spam > (in my case, prefixed with "[SPAM]" in the subject) moved to > separate courier imap folder (for example .SPAM). > I figured out (maybe I make error here) that I need procmail > to deliver the mail to the different courier-imap folders in the Maildir. > I couldn't find on the net clear algorithm that does that. (or at least > I failed reproducing it). > Anyone could help? I haven't used Courier, but I thought it used Maildir mailboxes natively, and procmail can deliver to Maildir. So all you would need to do is configure procmail accordingly (the procmailrc(5) has configuration, and procmailex(5) has recipes), and it should Just Work. But I haven't actually done it myself; I'm just trusting the documentation (!). -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 14:51:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBC916A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:51:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC8543D66 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:51:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 30589 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 14:51:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO TP51.local) ([pbs]775067@[217.187.176.11]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 14:51:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:51:24 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: "Martin P. Hansen" Message-ID: <20051228155124.7eb3853f@TP51.local> In-Reply-To: <20051226215455.GA14499@echobase.hoth.dk> References: <200512260703.jBQ73hcu060246@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> <20051226215455.GA14499@echobase.hoth.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_D19sUD6NSnjk+l+C/oaK.98"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dlink wireless adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:51:52 -0000 --Sig_D19sUD6NSnjk+l+C/oaK.98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Martin P. Hansen" wrote: > On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Imran Imtiaz wrote: > > how can i make my dlink DWL-G122 wireless usb adapter work with > > freebsd? >=20 > I can't find it in the list of native supported devices (the wi(4) > and ath(4) drivers). You might try your luck with the ndis(4) > converter. >=20 > This process is described in detail in the handbook's wireless > section: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireles= s.html The ndis part is outdated. Nowadays you use ndisgen to create an additional kernel module with the driver. It no longer is in if_ndis. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_D19sUD6NSnjk+l+C/oaK.98 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDsqZ8jV8GA4rMKUQRAjcfAKCmSGiB8zh9tygf5ddSEncsX63mKQCdEXLh c0DY1v816r93vj6/DuQMS6I= =ho0G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_D19sUD6NSnjk+l+C/oaK.98-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 14:55:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44F016A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:55:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mile@pershing.be) Received: from pershing.be (BSN-61-66-92.dsl.siol.net [86.61.66.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6F0643D5E for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:55:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mile@pershing.be) Received: (qmail 33779 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 14:59:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO pershing.be) (127.0.0.1) by pershing.be with SMTP; 28 Dec 2005 14:59:14 -0000 Received: (from mile@localhost) by pershing.be (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jBSExEAm033777 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:59:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mile) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:59:14 +0100 (CET) From: Mile Message-Id: <200512281459.jBSExEAm033777@pershing.be> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: mpd problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:55:33 -0000 Hi, I have a FreeBSD computer acting as gateway to windows clients.... Some sites like msn.com, opera.com, hp.com, najdi.si .... dont work on LAN... because of MTU problem. If i set MTU to 1492 instead of default 1500 then this sites work! (on windows) (If i use userland pppoe then everything works without setting MTU on LAN. (itself has an option mssfixup).) I tried with adding "set iface enable tcpmssfix" to mpd.conf as described in mpd documentation, but it still doesnt work... msn.com and opera.com work now... but others dont. mpd.conf (Version 3.18) default: load PPPoE PPPoE: new -i ng0 PPPoE PPPoE set iface addrs 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 set iface route default set iface disable on-demand set iface idle 0 set bundle disable multilink set bundle authname xxx set link no acfcomp protocomp set link disable pap chap set link accept chap set link mtu 1492 set link keep-alive 10 60 set ipcp yes vjcomp set ipcp ranges 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 set iface enable tcpmssfix open iface natd.conf interface ng0 dynamic yes use_sockets yes ipfw #natd /sbin/ipfw 15 add divert natd all from any to any via ng0 sysctl.conf security.bsd.see_other_uids=0 security.bsd.see_other_gids=0 security.bsd.unprivileged_read_msgbuf=0 net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 vm.swap_idle_enabled=1 kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=2097152 kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048 kern.maxfiles=65536 kern.maxfilesperproc=32768 net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0 net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=32768 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=32768 net.inet.udp.recvspace=32768 net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344 net.local.stream.recvspace=32768 net.local.stream.sendspace=32768 net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 net.inet.icmp.log_redirect=1 net.inet.ip.redirect=1 net.inet6.ip6.redirect=0 net.inet.ip.sourceroute=1 net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute=1 net.link.ether.inet.max_age=1200 net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho=0 #net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=1 net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1 If you need any more info please contact me. thanks, Brane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 15:07:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B43616A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:07:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbhurtha@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEBF43D6B for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:07:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbhurtha@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so524116uge for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:07:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jWgupsWdm4qAdqXy1Me8YhFXNru5LOZrqDmHIW7QpNLAG6xMe+3OcAcuEmjk6LpZtpe6u1aSqcMuF15Vq6lawsTlHQfnFynM2iMHHRTxvC4e33McqUJcV7pMiIxN1OU0Z53+8EVpW7ybvgqOvyBdgHLh6OAGSjADLWqNpAGt/zk= Received: by 10.67.22.3 with SMTP id z3mr2645764ugi; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:00:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.237.11 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:00:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:00:15 +0000 From: Roshan To: eoghan In-Reply-To: <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:07:17 -0000 On 12/28/05, eoghan wrote: > On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:55, Tofik Suleymanov wrote: > > > eoghan wrote: > > > >> Hello > >> Im wondering how to tell freeBSD about my 2 dvd drives. k3b > >> automatically detects them but it hasnt found either. > >> Thanks > >> Eoghan > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > Post your dmesg output here. > > > > I have copied it below, thanks: > > Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights > reserved. > FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Dec 4 17:43:10 UTC 2005 > root@nathaniel:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1400MHz (1395.76-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf07 Stepping =3D 7 > > Features=3D0x3febf9ff CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM> > real memory =3D 402157568 (383 MB) > avail memory =3D 384102400 (366 MB) > npx0: [FAST] > npx0: on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > pci_link0: irq 3 on acpi0 > pci_link1: irq 10 on acpi0 > pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 > pci_link3: irq 11 on acpi0 > pci_link4: on acpi0 > pci_link5: on acpi0 > pci_link6: on acpi0 > pci_link7: irq 9 on acpi0 > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 > cpu0: on acpi0 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xefffffff at > device 0.0 on pci0 > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 > pci2: on pcib2 > fwohci0: port 0xec80-0xecff mem > 0xff1ff800-0xff1fffff irq 10 at device 8.0 on pci2 > fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=3D1) > fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. > fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:06:00:00:99:d9:eb > fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. > fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. > firewire0: on fwohci0 > fwe0: on firewire0 > if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb > fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb > fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant > sbp0: on firewire0 > fwohci0: Initiate bus reset > fwohci0: node_id=3D0xc800ffc0, gen=3D1, CYCLEMASTER mode > firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <=3D 0, cable IRM =3D 0 (me) > firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) > pci2: at device 10.0 (no driver attached) > pci2: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) > xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe880-0xe8ff mem > 0xff1ff400-0xff1ff47f irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci2 > miibus0: on xl0 > ukphy0: on miibus0 > ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > xl0: Ethernet address: 00:b0:d0:e7:e9:7d > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > uhci0: port > 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 31.2 on pci0 > uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > uhci1: port > 0xff60-0xff7f irq 9 at device 31.4 on pci0 > uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb1: on uhci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on > acpi0 > fdc0: [FAST] > fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 > on acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 > on acpi0 > ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold > ppbus0: on ppc0 > plip0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > pmtimer0 on isa0 > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xca7ff,0xca800-0xcbfff on isa0 > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on > isa0 > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1395762544 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > ad0: FAILURE - SET_MULTI status=3D51 error=3D4 > ad0: 19470MB at ata0-master UDMA100 > ad1: 78167MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 > acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 > acd1: DVDR at ata1-slave UDMA33 > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > I can see that the drives have been detected as acd0 and acd1 and everything seems to be working normally. Can you describe your problem in more detail ? Are you not able to mount a data cd-rom when then latter is in the drive? Have you created mount points for your cd-rom drives e.g /cdrom and /cdrom1 and tried mounting them ? Roshan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 15:09:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B032B16A420 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:09:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BFC43D99 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:09:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 28542 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2005 02:08:59 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 28508, pid: 28515, t: 2.5894s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (194.125.95.46) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 02:08:56 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:08:54 +0000 To: Roshan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:09:26 -0000 On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:00, Roshan wrote: > On 12/28/05, eoghan wrote: >> On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:55, Tofik Suleymanov wrote: >> >>> eoghan wrote: >>> >>>> Hello >>>> Im wondering how to tell freeBSD about my 2 dvd drives. k3b >>>> automatically detects them but it hasnt found either. >>>> Thanks >>>> Eoghan >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >>>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>> Post your dmesg output here. >>> >> >> I have copied it below, thanks: >> >> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. >> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, >> 1993, 1994 >> The Regents of the University of California. All rights >> reserved. >> FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Dec 4 17:43:10 UTC 2005 >> root@nathaniel:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 >> CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1400MHz (1395.76-MHz 686-class CPU) >> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf07 Stepping = 7 >> >> Features=0x3febf9ff> CA, >> CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM> >> real memory = 402157568 (383 MB) >> avail memory = 384102400 (366 MB) >> npx0: [FAST] >> npx0: on motherboard >> npx0: INT 16 interface >> acpi0: on motherboard >> acpi0: Power Button (fixed) >> pci_link0: irq 3 on acpi0 >> pci_link1: irq 10 on acpi0 >> pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 >> pci_link3: irq 11 on acpi0 >> pci_link4: on acpi0 >> pci_link5: on acpi0 >> pci_link6: on acpi0 >> pci_link7: irq 9 on acpi0 >> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 >> acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 >> cpu0: on acpi0 >> acpi_button0: on acpi0 >> pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 >> pci0: on pcib0 >> agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xefffffff at >> device 0.0 on pci0 >> pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 >> pci1: on pcib1 >> pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) >> pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 >> pci2: on pcib2 >> fwohci0: port 0xec80-0xecff mem >> 0xff1ff800-0xff1fffff irq 10 at device 8.0 on pci2 >> fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) >> fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. >> fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:06:00:00:99:d9:eb >> fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. >> fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. >> firewire0: on fwohci0 >> fwe0: on firewire0 >> if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb >> fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb >> fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant >> sbp0: on firewire0 >> fwohci0: Initiate bus reset >> fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode >> firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) >> firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) >> pci2: at device 10.0 (no driver attached) >> pci2: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) >> xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe880-0xe8ff mem >> 0xff1ff400-0xff1ff47f irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci2 >> miibus0: on xl0 >> ukphy0: on miibus0 >> ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >> xl0: Ethernet address: 00:b0:d0:e7:e9:7d >> isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 >> isa0: on isab0 >> atapci0: port >> 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 >> on pci0 >> ata0: on atapci0 >> ata1: on atapci0 >> uhci0: port >> 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 31.2 on pci0 >> uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> usb0: on uhci0 >> usb0: USB revision 1.0 >> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >> pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) >> uhci1: port >> 0xff60-0xff7f irq 9 at device 31.4 on pci0 >> uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> usb1: on uhci1 >> usb1: USB revision 1.0 >> uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >> uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered >> fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on >> acpi0 >> fdc0: [FAST] >> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >> atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 >> atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >> kbd0 at atkbd0 >> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 >> psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 >> sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 >> on acpi0 >> sio0: type 16550A >> ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 >> on acpi0 >> ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode >> ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold >> ppbus0: on ppc0 >> plip0: on ppbus0 >> lpt0: on ppbus0 >> lpt0: Interrupt-driven port >> ppi0: on ppbus0 >> pmtimer0 on isa0 >> orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xca7ff,0xca800-0xcbfff >> on isa0 >> sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 >> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> >> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >> sio1: port may not be enabled >> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on >> isa0 >> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1395762544 Hz quality 800 >> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec >> ad0: FAILURE - SET_MULTI status=51 error=4 >> ad0: 19470MB at ata0-master >> UDMA100 >> ad1: 78167MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 >> acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 >> acd1: DVDR at ata1-slave UDMA33 >> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > I can see that the drives have been detected as acd0 and acd1 and > everything seems to be working normally. > > Can you describe your problem in more detail ? > > Are you not able to mount a data cd-rom when then latter is in the > drive? > > Have you created mount points for your cd-rom drives e.g /cdrom and > /cdrom1 and tried mounting them ? > > > Roshan > Hi Roshan Im using K3b, and its not seeing either drive. If I try add it like / dev/acd0 or /dev/acd1 it says it could not find additional device. I have not created mount points. The docs go through this is guess? Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 15:09:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4AE16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:09:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DA543D77 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:09:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id jBSF9WKM017632; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:09:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:09:32 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20051228150931.GE39217@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200512280535.WAA16578@lariat.net> <441wzxnvox.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <441wzxnvox.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Brett Glass , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail X port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:09:55 -0000 In the last episode (Dec 28), Lowell Gilbert said: > Brett Glass writes: > > I don't see Sendmail X available as a port or package. I'm > > interested in trying this version because it's the first to > > eliminate the horribly cryptic system of m4 macros, "classes", and > > address parsing rules that configured earlier versions. Is there a > > reason why it's not available as a package or port for FreeBSD? > > Well, it's still missing a lot of functionality that you need in a > FreeBSD system (such as the ability to actually deliver or submit > messages), so it's more of a challenge to port properly than one > would think. That's probably why it's still considered alpha > software. > > It builds easily enough, though. And the configuration sure is a lot > simpler (at the expense of some very powerful capabilities that were > very rarely used). So it's not as though there is some reason > somebody is trying to keep it *out* of the ports system. It is in ports, as mail/smx . -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 15:12:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C7616A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:12:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from knife.dreamhost.com (knife.dreamhost.com [66.33.219.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943D343D6D for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:12:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpe-24-24-83-9.stny.res.rr.com [24.24.83.9]) by knife.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC8DFB70C; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:12:29 -0800 (PST) From: Dev Tugnait To: eoghan In-Reply-To: References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:12:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dev@unixdaemon.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:12:48 -0000 In my opinion mount points are created automatically if everything goes smoothly with drive detection. cat /etc/fstab |grep acd Do you have device atapicam in your kernel? If not enable it On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 15:08 +0000, eoghan wrote: > On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:00, Roshan wrote: > > > On 12/28/05, eoghan wrote: > >> On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:55, Tofik Suleymanov wrote: > >> > >>> eoghan wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello > >>>> Im wondering how to tell freeBSD about my 2 dvd drives. k3b > >>>> automatically detects them but it hasnt found either. > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Eoghan > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > >>>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>>> > >>> Post your dmesg output here. > >>> > >> > >> I have copied it below, thanks: > >> > >> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. > >> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, > >> 1993, 1994 > >> The Regents of the University of California. All rights > >> reserved. > >> FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Dec 4 17:43:10 UTC 2005 > >> root@nathaniel:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > >> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > >> CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1400MHz (1395.76-MHz 686-class CPU) > >> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf07 Stepping = 7 > >> > >> Features=0x3febf9ff >> CA, > >> CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM> > >> real memory = 402157568 (383 MB) > >> avail memory = 384102400 (366 MB) > >> npx0: [FAST] > >> npx0: on motherboard > >> npx0: INT 16 interface > >> acpi0: on motherboard > >> acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > >> pci_link0: irq 3 on acpi0 > >> pci_link1: irq 10 on acpi0 > >> pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 > >> pci_link3: irq 11 on acpi0 > >> pci_link4: on acpi0 > >> pci_link5: on acpi0 > >> pci_link6: on acpi0 > >> pci_link7: irq 9 on acpi0 > >> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > >> acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 > >> cpu0: on acpi0 > >> acpi_button0: on acpi0 > >> pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > >> pci0: on pcib0 > >> agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xefffffff at > >> device 0.0 on pci0 > >> pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > >> pci1: on pcib1 > >> pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > >> pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 > >> pci2: on pcib2 > >> fwohci0: port 0xec80-0xecff mem > >> 0xff1ff800-0xff1fffff irq 10 at device 8.0 on pci2 > >> fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) > >> fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. > >> fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:06:00:00:99:d9:eb > >> fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. > >> fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. > >> firewire0: on fwohci0 > >> fwe0: on firewire0 > >> if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb > >> fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb > >> fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant > >> sbp0: on firewire0 > >> fwohci0: Initiate bus reset > >> fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode > >> firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) > >> firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) > >> pci2: at device 10.0 (no driver attached) > >> pci2: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) > >> xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe880-0xe8ff mem > >> 0xff1ff400-0xff1ff47f irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci2 > >> miibus0: on xl0 > >> ukphy0: on miibus0 > >> ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > >> xl0: Ethernet address: 00:b0:d0:e7:e9:7d > >> isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > >> isa0: on isab0 > >> atapci0: port > >> 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 > >> on pci0 > >> ata0: on atapci0 > >> ata1: on atapci0 > >> uhci0: port > >> 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 31.2 on pci0 > >> uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> usb0: on uhci0 > >> usb0: USB revision 1.0 > >> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >> pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > >> uhci1: port > >> 0xff60-0xff7f irq 9 at device 31.4 on pci0 > >> uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> usb1: on uhci1 > >> usb1: USB revision 1.0 > >> uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >> uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >> fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on > >> acpi0 > >> fdc0: [FAST] > >> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > >> atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > >> atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > >> kbd0 at atkbd0 > >> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > >> psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 > >> sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 > >> on acpi0 > >> sio0: type 16550A > >> ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 > >> on acpi0 > >> ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > >> ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold > >> ppbus0: on ppc0 > >> plip0: on ppbus0 > >> lpt0: on ppbus0 > >> lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > >> ppi0: on ppbus0 > >> pmtimer0 on isa0 > >> orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xca7ff,0xca800-0xcbfff > >> on isa0 > >> sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > >> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > >> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > >> sio1: port may not be enabled > >> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on > >> isa0 > >> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1395762544 Hz quality 800 > >> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > >> ad0: FAILURE - SET_MULTI status=51 error=4 > >> ad0: 19470MB at ata0-master > >> UDMA100 > >> ad1: 78167MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 > >> acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 > >> acd1: DVDR at ata1-slave UDMA33 > >> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > I can see that the drives have been detected as acd0 and acd1 and > > everything seems to be working normally. > > > > Can you describe your problem in more detail ? > > > > Are you not able to mount a data cd-rom when then latter is in the > > drive? > > > > Have you created mount points for your cd-rom drives e.g /cdrom and > > /cdrom1 and tried mounting them ? > > > > > > Roshan > > > > Hi Roshan > Im using K3b, and its not seeing either drive. If I try add it like / > dev/acd0 or /dev/acd1 it says it could not find additional device. > I have not created mount points. The docs go through this is guess? > Thanks > Eoghan > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Dev Tugnait From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 15:17:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B381016A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:17:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdbeni@spymac.com) Received: from xizor.is.scarlet.be (xizor.is.scarlet.be [193.74.71.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AAC43D5D for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:17:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdbeni@spymac.com) Received: from ([62.235.212.12]) by xizor.is.scarlet.be with ESMTP id jBSFGww05607 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:16:58 +0100 From: FreeBsdBeni To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:16:28 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1533990.cebKsZ2pIN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512281616.32589.freebsdbeni@spymac.com> Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:17:02 -0000 --nextPart1533990.cebKsZ2pIN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 28 December 2005 07:08, eoghan wrote: > On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:00, Roshan wrote: > > On 12/28/05, eoghan wrote: > >> On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:55, Tofik Suleymanov wrote: > >>> eoghan wrote: > >>>> Hello > >>>> Im wondering how to tell freeBSD about my 2 dvd drives. k3b > >>>> automatically detects them but it hasnt found either. > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Eoghan > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > >>>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >>> Post your dmesg output here. > >> > >> I have copied it below, thanks: > >> > >> Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. > >> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, > >> 1993, 1994 > >> The Regents of the University of California. All rights > >> reserved. > >> FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Dec 4 17:43:10 UTC 2005 > >> root@nathaniel:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > >> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > >> CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1400MHz (1395.76-MHz 686-class CPU) > >> Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf07 Stepping =3D 7 > >> > >> Features=3D0x3febf9ff >> CA, > >> CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM> > >> real memory =3D 402157568 (383 MB) > >> avail memory =3D 384102400 (366 MB) > >> npx0: [FAST] > >> npx0: on motherboard > >> npx0: INT 16 interface > >> acpi0: on motherboard > >> acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > >> pci_link0: irq 3 on acpi0 > >> pci_link1: irq 10 on acpi0 > >> pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 > >> pci_link3: irq 11 on acpi0 > >> pci_link4: on acpi0 > >> pci_link5: on acpi0 > >> pci_link6: on acpi0 > >> pci_link7: irq 9 on acpi0 > >> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > >> acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 > >> cpu0: on acpi0 > >> acpi_button0: on acpi0 > >> pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > >> pci0: on pcib0 > >> agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xefffffff at > >> device 0.0 on pci0 > >> pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > >> pci1: on pcib1 > >> pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > >> pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 > >> pci2: on pcib2 > >> fwohci0: port 0xec80-0xecff mem > >> 0xff1ff800-0xff1fffff irq 10 at device 8.0 on pci2 > >> fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=3D1) > >> fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 8. > >> fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:06:00:00:99:d9:eb > >> fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. > >> fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. > >> firewire0: on fwohci0 > >> fwe0: on firewire0 > >> if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb > >> fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:11:06:99:d9:eb > >> fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant > >> sbp0: on firewire0 > >> fwohci0: Initiate bus reset > >> fwohci0: node_id=3D0xc800ffc0, gen=3D1, CYCLEMASTER mode > >> firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <=3D 0, cable IRM =3D 0 (me) > >> firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) > >> pci2: at device 10.0 (no driver attached) > >> pci2: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) > >> xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe880-0xe8ff mem > >> 0xff1ff400-0xff1ff47f irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci2 > >> miibus0: on xl0 > >> ukphy0: on miibus0 > >> ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > >> xl0: Ethernet address: 00:b0:d0:e7:e9:7d > >> isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > >> isa0: on isab0 > >> atapci0: port > >> 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 31.1 > >> on pci0 > >> ata0: on atapci0 > >> ata1: on atapci0 > >> uhci0: port > >> 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 31.2 on pci0 > >> uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> usb0: on uhci0 > >> usb0: USB revision 1.0 > >> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >> pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > >> uhci1: port > >> 0xff60-0xff7f irq 9 at device 31.4 on pci0 > >> uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> usb1: on uhci1 > >> usb1: USB revision 1.0 > >> uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > >> uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > >> fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on > >> acpi0 > >> fdc0: [FAST] > >> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > >> atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > >> atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > >> kbd0 at atkbd0 > >> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > >> psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 > >> sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 > >> on acpi0 > >> sio0: type 16550A > >> ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 > >> on acpi0 > >> ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > >> ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold > >> ppbus0: on ppc0 > >> plip0: on ppbus0 > >> lpt0: on ppbus0 > >> lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > >> ppi0: on ppbus0 > >> pmtimer0 on isa0 > >> orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xca7ff,0xca800-0xcbfff > >> on isa0 > >> sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > >> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> > >> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > >> sio1: port may not be enabled > >> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on > >> isa0 > >> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1395762544 Hz quality 800 > >> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > >> ad0: FAILURE - SET_MULTI status=3D51 error=3D4 > >> ad0: 19470MB at ata0-master > >> UDMA100 > >> ad1: 78167MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 > >> acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 > >> acd1: DVDR at ata1-slave UDMA33 > >> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > I can see that the drives have been detected as acd0 and acd1 and > > everything seems to be working normally. > > > > Can you describe your problem in more detail ? > > > > Are you not able to mount a data cd-rom when then latter is in the > > drive? > > > > Have you created mount points for your cd-rom drives e.g /cdrom and > > /cdrom1 and tried mounting them ? > > > > > > Roshan > > Hi Roshan > Im using K3b, and its not seeing either drive. If I try add it like / > dev/acd0 or /dev/acd1 it says it could not find additional device. > I have not created mount points. The docs go through this is guess? > Thanks > Eoghan > See also the /usr/ports/sysutils/k3b/pkg-message5 about the use of k3b. =2D-=20 Beni. --nextPart1533990.cebKsZ2pIN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDsyrg98oeEzEDrEcRAu6IAJ4xAqsrIsOyCKNtRQ3ZfTHkAFZhGQCglPnz r9qc5OSDRfos+0bYQnsnJMk= =RNTH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1533990.cebKsZ2pIN-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 15:34:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5F516A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:34:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB7B43D88 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:34:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 45709 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2005 02:33:58 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 45609, pid: 45617, t: 10.0456s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (194.125.95.46) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 02:33:48 +1100 In-Reply-To: <1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> <1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:33:47 +0000 To: dev@unixdaemon.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:34:19 -0000 On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:12, Dev Tugnait wrote: > In my opinion mount points are created automatically if everything > goes > smoothly with drive detection. cat /etc/fstab |grep acd > > Do you have device atapicam in your kernel? If not enable it yes this show me: /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noaut o 0 0 /dev/acd1 /cdrom1 cd9660 ro,noaut o 0 0 how do i check if i have atapicam in my kernel? Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 15:41:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088FC16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:41:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas@itsc.at) Received: from natas.itsc.at (static81-223-21-146.adsl.inode.at [81.223.21.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B0943D46 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:41:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas@itsc.at) Received: from natas.itsc.at (localhost.itsc.at [127.0.0.1]) by natas.itsc.at (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBSFPamv047664; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:25:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from thomas@itsc.at) Received: (from thomas@localhost) by natas.itsc.at (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBSFPZj1047663; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:25:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from thomas) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:25:35 +0100 From: Thomas Linton To: "Gestur A. Grjetarsson" Message-ID: <20051228152535.GA47562@natas.it-sc.at> References: <636A75F5E9CA8741A3136582949F95876E9E25@postur.ecweb.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <636A75F5E9CA8741A3136582949F95876E9E25@postur.ecweb.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:41:06 -0000 I tried to boot a 6.0 Installation CD on a HS20 Blade. I always get "can't load 'kernel'" from the cdloader. If I type "lsdev" it shows me no "cd devices"; a "ls" brings "open '/' failed:.." and the LED of the cdrom-drive stays dark. The BladeCenter is using a USB-CDROM and I think this is actually the problem of booting a Blade from a freeBSD CD. Did you try a Network-Based installation? How far did you come with your installation? On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 01:32:44PM -0000, Gestur A. Grjetarsson wrote: > Hi > > I have IBM Blade with Qlogic 2312 adapters using DS400 SAN > > now I have learned that after over 10 years of good FreeBSD experience on various sorts of hardware, I can't use FreeBSD anymore as it does'nt work on IBM Blade. > I have read alot on this problem trying to solve this problem and done alot of testing and hacking but without any progress. > > so I have two questions: > > is FreeBSD going to support IBM Blade? > > if it is going to support and work on IBM Blade, can you give me an estimation on when it will be ready to run on IBM Blade? > > kveðja > Gestur > Iceland > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 15:47:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E712E16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:47:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from spatula.dreamhost.com (spatula.dreamhost.com [66.33.205.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19D143D5C for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:47:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpe-24-24-83-9.stny.res.rr.com [24.24.83.9]) by spatula.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89AC7F07F; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:46:51 -0800 (PST) From: Dev Tugnait To: eoghan In-Reply-To: <91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net> References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> <1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> <91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:47:20 -0500 Message-Id: <1135784840.78035.30.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dev@unixdaemon.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:47:45 -0000 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-cds.html#ATAPICAM On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 15:33 +0000, eoghan wrote: > On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:12, Dev Tugnait wrote: > > > In my opinion mount points are created automatically if everything > > goes > > smoothly with drive detection. cat /etc/fstab |grep acd > > > > Do you have device atapicam in your kernel? If not enable it > > yes this show me: > /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noaut o 0 0 > /dev/acd1 /cdrom1 cd9660 ro,noaut o 0 0 > > how do i check if i have atapicam in my kernel? > Thanks > Eoghan -- Dev Tugnait From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 15:50:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE91D16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp.wp.pl [212.77.101.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D084C43D8E for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:50:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 9432 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 16:50:02 +0100 Received: from aed26.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO maslan) (maslan-freebsd@[83.16.107.26]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 16:50:02 +0100 Message-ID: <001001c60bc6$68a87b20$1e00000a@maslan> From: "maslan-freebsd" To: References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net><43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az><42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net><1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> <91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:50:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO AS1=NO AS2=NO(0.900546) AS3=NO AS4=NO Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:50:23 -0000 Type "uname -a" in console. If you have GENERIC kernel you don't have atapicam in your kernel. You have generic if you didn't compile your own kernel. . Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: "eoghan" To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 4:33 PM Subject: Re: dvd drive > On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:12, Dev Tugnait wrote: > > > In my opinion mount points are created automatically if everything > > goes > > smoothly with drive detection. cat /etc/fstab |grep acd > > > > Do you have device atapicam in your kernel? If not enable it > > yes this show me: > /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noaut o 0 0 > /dev/acd1 /cdrom1 cd9660 ro,noaut o 0 0 > > how do i check if i have atapicam in my kernel? > Thanks > Eoghan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 16:18:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77E616A420 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:18:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4861843D62 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:18:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 81233 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2005 03:18:23 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 81197, pid: 81214, t: 1.2690s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (194.125.95.46) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 03:18:22 +1100 In-Reply-To: <1135784840.78035.30.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> <1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> <91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net> <1135784840.78035.30.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:18:19 +0000 To: dev@unixdaemon.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:18:25 -0000 On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:47, Dev Tugnait wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating- > cds.html#ATAPICAM Thanks. So is this the only way to use these devices, compiling with a custom kernel? I used a generic kernel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 16:21:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93EB16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:21:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4824C43D6A for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 83196 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2005 03:21:21 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 83093, pid: 83138, t: 4.4531s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (194.125.95.46) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 03:21:16 +1100 In-Reply-To: <001001c60bc6$68a87b20$1e00000a@maslan> References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net><43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az><42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net><1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> <91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net> <001001c60bc6$68a87b20$1e00000a@maslan> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:21:14 +0000 To: maslan-freebsd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:21:36 -0000 On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:50, maslan-freebsd wrote: > Type "uname -a" in console. If you have GENERIC kernel you don't have > atapicam in your kernel. You have generic if you didn't compile > your own > kernel. . > Regards Yes I have compiled with generic kernel. I look into the doc page to change t his... I did try mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd1 /mnt but it gave me: mount_cd9660: /dev/acd1: Input/Output error I assume that I need to config with atapicam for this to work? Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 16:25:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCCB16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:25:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAF343D53 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:25:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y38so566863nfb for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:25:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IaZvEaX+79Z4fP1AYeWdmDT+qSbykSZkzky6qvEOMGPT/JgCVAky2WbuD7DEGb2jSnoJtSIgS+A1INs9y4dm7t++J9wy41p9vAIRQp1d7xExs7azK0K65sVCXJYtx7aQXxAHvEussvcmr4fxrSL4s/KEKy1rUdyDDDOs2wHHVNI= Received: by 10.48.249.2 with SMTP id w2mr207312nfh; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:25:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.225.4 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:25:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:25:35 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: Angelin Lalev In-Reply-To: <43B2729B.1030203@sv-bg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43B2729B.1030203@sv-bg.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qmail + vpopmail + procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:25:37 -0000 On 12/28/05, Angelin Lalev wrote: > But now my friend's clients want all mail that is tagged as spam > (in my case, prefixed with "[SPAM]" in the subject) moved to > separate courier imap folder (for example .SPAM). > I figured out (maybe I make error here) that I need procmail > to deliver the mail to the different courier-imap folders in the Maildir. > I couldn't find on the net clear algorithm that does that. (or at least > I failed reproducing it). > Anyone could help? This is up to the end user to do. My $HOME/.qmail looks like so | preline procmail ~/.procmailrc >From there, you can filter in .procmailrc like... :0 ^Subject:.*SPAM $MAILDIR/junkmail/ where MAILDIR=3D$HOME/Maildir, or some other appropriate place for the user= 's MUA. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 16:27:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E656A16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:27:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from whisk.dreamhost.com (whisk.dreamhost.com [205.196.208.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FE343D5C for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:27:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev@unixdaemon.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpe-24-24-83-9.stny.res.rr.com [24.24.83.9]) by whisk.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E777F03B; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:27:33 -0800 (PST) From: Dev Tugnait To: eoghan In-Reply-To: References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> <1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> <91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net> <001001c60bc6$68a87b20$1e00000a@maslan> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:27:41 -0500 Message-Id: <1135787261.78035.34.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dev@unixdaemon.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:27:50 -0000 On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 16:21 +0000, eoghan wrote: > On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:50, maslan-freebsd wrote: > > > Type "uname -a" in console. If you have GENERIC kernel you don't have > > atapicam in your kernel. You have generic if you didn't compile > > your own > > kernel. . > > Regards > > Yes I have compiled with generic kernel. I look into the doc page to > change t his... > I did try mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd1 /mnt > but it gave me: > mount_cd9660: /dev/acd1: Input/Output error > I assume that I need to config with atapicam for this to work? > Eoghan Yepp, you can just add that option to the GENERIC kernel if you are new and are not comfortable configuring your kernel yet, just rebuild it and reboot. Since user error comes easier method is to do cp GENERIC MYCUSTOMKERNEL or whatever you wanna call it and add atapicam to that and build it. Read the handbook on building the kernel Good Luck > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Dev Tugnait From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 16:29:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89F216A420 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:29:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: from larfur.svaka.net (larfur.svaka.net [213.176.155.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E83243D64 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:29:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: (from root@localhost) by larfur.svaka.net (MX.SVAKA.NET) id jBSGTc57064158; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:29:38 GMT (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: from ipfw.ecweb.local (ipfw.ec.is [213.220.85.70]) by larfur.svaka.net (mx1.svaka.net) with ESMTP id jBSGTWVI064031; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:29:37 GMT (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: from ec.is (postur.ecweb.local [192.168.25.11]) by ipfw.ecweb.local (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBSGWl3M040222; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:32:48 GMT (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:34:53 -0000 Message-ID: <636A75F5E9CA8741A3136582949F95876E9E42@postur.ecweb.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? Thread-Index: AcYLxeAZlqITuW4ATM6XDycLYKIKSwABmydg From: "Gestur A. Grjetarsson" To: "Thomas Linton" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.3 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,RCVD_IN_DSBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS,USER_IN_WHITELIST scanned=Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:29:38 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on larfur.svaka.net X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1218/Mon Dec 26 13:46:59 2005 on larfur.svaka.net X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1218/Mon Dec 26 13:46:59 2005 on ipfw.ecweb.local X-Virus-Status: Clean X-scanner: Scanned by Xamime-LT 0.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:29:46 -0000 Hi I tried using freebsd floppies ,, by using that I could boot into = sysinstall ,, but the system doesn't see any disk devices other than the = USB disk which is 1Mb size. I tried to use custom kernel on the floppies and tweak the ISP driver, = to prevent the stall when the driver hangs during boot and get the = timeout, that with no result. the isp driver which is said to support the Qlogic 2312, is broken, it = doesn't work. kve=F0ja / best regards Gestur=20 -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Linton [mailto:th.linton@gmail.com]=20 Sent: 28. desember 2005 15:26 To: Gestur A. Grjetarsson Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? I tried to boot a 6.0 Installation CD on a HS20 Blade. I always get = "can't load 'kernel'" from the cdloader. If I type "lsdev" it shows me = no "cd devices"; a "ls" brings "open '/' failed:.." and the LED of the = cdrom-drive stays dark.=20 The BladeCenter is using a USB-CDROM and I think this is actually the = problem of booting a Blade from a freeBSD CD. Did you try a = Network-Based installation? How far did you come with your installation? On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 01:32:44PM -0000, Gestur A. Grjetarsson wrote: > Hi > =20 > I have IBM Blade with Qlogic 2312 adapters using DS400 SAN > =20 > now I have learned that after over 10 years of good FreeBSD experience = on various sorts of hardware, I can't use FreeBSD anymore as it does'nt = work on IBM Blade. > I have read alot on this problem trying to solve this problem and done = alot of testing and hacking but without any progress. > =20 > so I have two questions: > =20 > is FreeBSD going to support IBM Blade? > =20 > if it is going to support and work on IBM Blade, can you give me an = estimation on when it will be ready to run on IBM Blade? > =20 > kve=F0ja > Gestur > Iceland > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 16:54:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA4716A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:54:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BAE43D66 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:54:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 9749 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2005 03:54:53 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 9552, pid: 9579, t: 11.5029s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (194.125.95.46) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 03:54:41 +1100 In-Reply-To: <1135787261.78035.34.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net> <43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az> <42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net> <1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> <91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net> <001001c60bc6$68a87b20$1e00000a@maslan> <1135787261.78035.34.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:54:39 +0000 To: dev@unixdaemon.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:54:59 -0000 On 28 Dec 2005, at 16:27, Dev Tugnait wrote: > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 16:21 +0000, eoghan wrote: >> On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:50, maslan-freebsd wrote: >> >>> Type "uname -a" in console. If you have GENERIC kernel you don't >>> have >>> atapicam in your kernel. You have generic if you didn't compile >>> your own >>> kernel. . >>> Regards >> >> Yes I have compiled with generic kernel. I look into the doc page to >> change t his... >> I did try mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd1 /mnt >> but it gave me: >> mount_cd9660: /dev/acd1: Input/Output error >> I assume that I need to config with atapicam for this to work? >> Eoghan > > Yepp, you can just add that option to the GENERIC kernel if you are > new > and are not comfortable configuring your kernel yet, just rebuild > it and > reboot. Since user error comes easier method is to do cp GENERIC > MYCUSTOMKERNEL or whatever you wanna call it and add atapicam to that > and build it. > > Read the handbook on building the kernel > > Good Luck > Thanks for all the help, I will do the rebuild as you suggest. Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 17:56:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AE016A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:56:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp.wp.pl [212.77.101.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6BF43D78 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:56:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 387 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 18:56:10 +0100 Received: from aed26.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO maslan) (maslan-freebsd@[83.16.107.26]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 18:56:10 +0100 Message-ID: <002d01c60bd8$072207b0$1e00000a@maslan> From: "maslan-freebsd" To: References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net><43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az><42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net><1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net><91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net><001001c60bc6$68a87b20$1e00000a@maslan><1135787261.78035.34.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:56:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO AS1=NO AS2=YES(0.999384) AS3=NO AS4=NO Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:56:15 -0000 Try "kldload atapicam.ko"it should load atapicam module to your kernel. if it works to should type atapicam_load="YES" in loader.conf ----- Original Message ----- From: "eoghan" To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 5:54 PM Subject: Re: dvd drive > On 28 Dec 2005, at 16:27, Dev Tugnait wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 16:21 +0000, eoghan wrote: > >> On 28 Dec 2005, at 15:50, maslan-freebsd wrote: > >> > >>> Type "uname -a" in console. If you have GENERIC kernel you don't > >>> have > >>> atapicam in your kernel. You have generic if you didn't compile > >>> your own > >>> kernel. . > >>> Regards > >> > >> Yes I have compiled with generic kernel. I look into the doc page to > >> change t his... > >> I did try mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd1 /mnt > >> but it gave me: > >> mount_cd9660: /dev/acd1: Input/Output error > >> I assume that I need to config with atapicam for this to work? > >> Eoghan > > > > Yepp, you can just add that option to the GENERIC kernel if you are > > new > > and are not comfortable configuring your kernel yet, just rebuild > > it and > > reboot. Since user error comes easier method is to do cp GENERIC > > MYCUSTOMKERNEL or whatever you wanna call it and add atapicam to that > > and build it. > > > > Read the handbook on building the kernel > > > > Good Luck > > > > Thanks for all the help, > I will do the rebuild as you suggest. > Eoghan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 18:29:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E903416A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:29:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39D043D64 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:29:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 85502 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2005 05:29:07 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 85453, pid: 85468, t: 3.0136s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (194.125.95.46) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 05:29:04 +1100 In-Reply-To: <002d01c60bd8$072207b0$1e00000a@maslan> References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net><43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az><42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net><1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net><91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net><001001c60bc6$68a87b20$1e00000a@maslan><1135787261.78035.34.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> <002d01c60bd8$072207b0$1e00000a@maslan> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <21536208-AE83-46A9-8113-64BAE9EEBC97@redry.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:28:59 +0000 To: maslan-freebsd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:29:11 -0000 On 28 Dec 2005, at 17:56, maslan-freebsd wrote: > Try "kldload atapicam.ko"it should load atapicam module to your > kernel. if > it works to should type > atapicam_load="YES" > in loader.conf thanks, I tried that and it gave me no errors. How can I check if it worked? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 18:56:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EF416A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:56:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB8E43D5D for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:56:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 4169 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2005 05:56:29 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 4124, pid: 4141, t: 1.5786s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (194.125.95.46) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 05:56:27 +1100 In-Reply-To: <002d01c60bd8$072207b0$1e00000a@maslan> References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net><43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az><42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net><1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net><91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net><001001c60bc6$68a87b20$1e00000a@maslan><1135787261.78035.34.camel@dracula.transylvania.net> <002d01c60bd8$072207b0$1e00000a@maslan> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:56:25 +0000 To: maslan-freebsd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:56:32 -0000 On 28 Dec 2005, at 17:56, maslan-freebsd wrote: > Try "kldload atapicam.ko"it should load atapicam module to your > kernel. if > it works to should type > atapicam_load="YES" > in loader.conf Sorry, restarted K3b and it detected both drives, test a rip and it works perfect. So I can add this to my loader.conf. Thanks for the tip. Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 19:09:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD28716A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:09:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp.wp.pl [212.77.101.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FD843D58 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:09:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslan-freebsd@wp.pl) Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 18550 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 20:09:24 +0100 Received: from aed26.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO maslan) (maslan-freebsd@[83.16.107.26]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for ; 28 Dec 2005 20:09:24 +0100 Message-ID: <004d01c60be2$42630d60$1e00000a@maslan> From: "maslan-freebsd" To: "FreeBSD" References: <244E8E94-A4F7-48B9-B527-06EF505B3BC9@redry.net><43B2B55B.3040904@oxygen.az><42AA7A5B-953E-4148-B950-9DF672ADE4A8@redry.net><1135782744.78035.26.camel@dracula.transylvania.net><91DD3CAA-2514-41C5-94A9-D241AFFA96E2@redry.net><001001c60bc6$68a87b20$1e00000a@maslan><1135787261.78035.34.camel@dracula.transylvania.net><002d01c60bd8$072207b0$1e00000a@maslan> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:09:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO AS1=NO AS2=YES(0.995054) AS3=NO AS4=NO Subject: Re: dvd drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:09:27 -0000 Yes if you add this to loader.conf this module will be load on system start up. Have a nice day! ----- Original Message ----- From: "eoghan" To: "maslan-freebsd" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 7:56 PM Subject: Re: dvd drive > On 28 Dec 2005, at 17:56, maslan-freebsd wrote: > > > Try "kldload atapicam.ko"it should load atapicam module to your > > kernel. if > > it works to should type /// it works you should > > atapicam_load="YES" > > in loader.conf > > Sorry, restarted K3b and it detected both drives, test a rip and it > works perfect. So I can add this to my loader.conf. > Thanks for the tip. > Eoghan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 19:25:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A374516A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:25:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rseals@vdsi.net) Received: from broad.100mwh.com (broad.100mwh.com [205.214.86.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FC343D72 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:25:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rseals@vdsi.net) Received: from static-70-22-125-177.balt.east.verizon.net ([70.22.125.177] helo=stlmofaxtest.mbh.mhs.magellanhs.com) by broad.100mwh.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ErgvQ-0005fB-LB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:25:07 -0600 From: Ray Seals To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Virtual Data Systems, Inc. Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:25:45 -0600 Message-Id: <1135797945.645.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - broad.100mwh.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vdsi.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Is there a Freebsd equivalent to this Linux header file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rseals@vdsi.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:25:44 -0000 I'm not a programmer, but I trying to learn a few things. I have a Niagara 2261 pass through nic and I need to change it's operating mode. It came with the source code and header files for a command line utility which allows me to change operation modes on the card. Along with the documentation. The card is recognized under the 'em' network driver. I have all the errors down except for one. The error is 'SIOCDEVPRIVATE' undeclared (first use in this function). Doing some research I found that the linux header file sockios.h defines this. Is there a FreeBSD equivalent to this or am I so far out of my league with this question that I should probably just stop right now? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 19:40:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C1916A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:40:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10DF43D58 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1613728nzo for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:40:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=grqSZNJS98siZn2uZkCK8+xK/zGB11xHc0JA54pkWTqW97AAEUYme6Mk9EROT9a6zBuU5W1LGzOc1/5deeRL4h7phvriRT0yB8EuiN2ugeznQGkfjb8W+w45iJT1CI/268k4/Mcr6YFCBPgHG+PHprqFc4n16jLg3/nBq1gPsak= Received: by 10.36.68.5 with SMTP id q5mr5822453nza; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:40:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:40:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:40:43 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: rseals@vdsi.net In-Reply-To: <1135797945.645.8.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1135797945.645.8.camel@localhost> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Is there a Freebsd equivalent to this Linux header file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:40:57 -0000 On 12/28/05, Ray Seals wrote: > I'm not a programmer, but I trying to learn a few things. I have a > Niagara 2261 pass through nic and I need to change it's operating mode. > It came with the source code and header files for a command line utility > which allows me to change operation modes on the card. Along with the > documentation. > > The card is recognized under the 'em' network driver. > > I have all the errors down except for one. The error is > 'SIOCDEVPRIVATE' undeclared (first use in this function). > > Doing some research I found that the linux header file sockios.h defines > this. > > Is there a FreeBSD equivalent to this or am I so far out of my league > with this question that I should probably just stop right now? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Have a look at /compat/linux/linux_ioctl.h From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 19:47:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6FD16A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:47:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: from web54009.mail.yahoo.com (web54009.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9F6B43D5A for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:47:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 83674 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Dec 2005 19:47:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CLqWcNHZ6HtjzW27tPd+9/8KPDAAQEa40rjo4Z871vQTUSaX/mtr7Tz2t3YAFr8PS0Akojw/ZzruGnuBTr4eTx2RbuPl9Okn3ilhXEz2ti38evO1Tcgs/upxLgOl82PcYOIGbdaOsoz5Jsv/IytStZX7EI+K2kVSOK2gILHW660= ; Message-ID: <20051228194721.83672.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [71.140.186.33] by web54009.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:47:21 PST Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:47:21 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Marciano To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: How do I get gdbserver for FreeBSD 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:47:26 -0000 Hello, I hope someone can help me. I am using FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE and would like to use gdbserver, but I can't find it. The source tree has gdbserver in two places: /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/gdbserver and /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdbserver There's also a gdb6 in /usr/ports/devel. The installed gdb says its version 6.1.1, and it looks like the /usr/src/contrib/gdb tree is also 6.1.1, but there's no configure script or Makefile. Is this tree a patch for the usr/ports/devel/gdb6? I'm a bit lost right now. I hope someone can help me find my way. Thanks, Paul. __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 20:42:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE23516A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:42:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3A443D58 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:42:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id jBSKgu1X083359; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:42:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:42:56 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Ray Seals Message-ID: <20051228204256.GG39217@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1135797945.645.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1135797945.645.8.camel@localhost> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Is there a Freebsd equivalent to this Linux header file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:42:58 -0000 In the last episode (Dec 28), Ray Seals said: > I'm not a programmer, but I trying to learn a few things. I have a > Niagara 2261 pass through nic and I need to change it's operating > mode. It came with the source code and header files for a command > line utility which allows me to change operation modes on the card. > Along with the documentation. > > The card is recognized under the 'em' network driver. > > I have all the errors down except for one. The error is > 'SIOCDEVPRIVATE' undeclared (first use in this function). That's probably a Linux-specific ioctl. Chances are that FreeBSD's ifconfig command will do what you want (so its sources are a good place to start looking); what do you mean by "change it's operating mode"? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 21:20:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246B116A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE7043D55 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:20:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBSLKV8c087620 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:20:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jBSLKVwm087619 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:20:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:20:30 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20051228212030.GA87596@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 19 years of service to the Unix community Cc: Subject: Ooo-2.0 build snafu... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:20:36 -0000 I keep running into this build error with openoffice-2.0. Just curious if this is a new error or not. Pointers welcome. I'm running 5.3 on this particular server. thanks in advance, people, gary /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh -L../../unxfbsd.pro/lib -L../lib -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/solenv/unxfbsd/lib -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsd.pro/lib -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/solenv/unxfbsd/lib -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/lib -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386 -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/client -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/native_threads -L/usr/X11R6/lib ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libofficebean.so Checking DLL ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libofficebean.so ...Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) Abort trap (core dumped) dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/libofficebean.so' '---* tg_merge.mk *---' ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/bean/native/unix dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native' '---* tg_merge.mk *---' *** Error code 255 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 21:53:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CA416A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk (pfepc.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC8C43D62 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:53:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mph@echobase.hoth.dk) Received: from echobase.hoth.dk (echobase.hoth.dk [80.62.210.27]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D5D262814 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:53:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by echobase.hoth.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0647417BEA; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:53:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:53:53 +0100 From: "Martin P. Hansen" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051228215353.GA8743@echobase.hoth.dk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051228112558.GA79302@bsdmon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051228112558.GA79302@bsdmon.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Preserve date when cp over smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:53:57 -0000 On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gilbert Cao wrote: > When I copy a single file with the cp utility, with -p flag, to > a smbfs mounted directory, the modification datetime is not preserved and it > is set to the current datetime : I've had this problem too, cp was also emitting a warning about utimes: mph# mount -t smbfs -o-Eiso8859-1:cp850,-f660 //mph@light/e$ /mnt mph% cp -p INFO /mnt cp: utimes: /mnt/INFO: Operation not permitted This was because I wasn't ``owner'' of the files. Adding the -u flag fixed this. mph# mount -t smbfs -o-Eiso8859-1:cp850,-f660,-umph //mph@light/e$ /mnt Now my modification time is preserved. -- Martin P. Hansen | () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | /\ Against HTML Email! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 22:01:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4650616A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:01:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5821643D5D for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:01:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:01:54 +0100 id 00039837.43B30B52.0000113E Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:01:54 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051228220153.GA4337@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <1135661999.43b0d3af7568e@www.c-inter.com.ar> <43B11DCF.40504@FreeBSD.org> <43B17913.1020106@math.missouri.edu> <20051228125510.4f91926c@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <43B2D941.3080307@math.missouri.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43B2D941.3080307@math.missouri.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: compat 5x libraries missnig after restart X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:01:57 -0000 On 28 Dec Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > But why not put > compat_xx_enable="YES" There's more wrong to the script. I have compat5x_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and the script start up, _BUT_ if I shut down (for whatever reason) I get this console msg question: "compat5x.sh running?" Strange, it _is_ running, so why is it not "seen" -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 22:03:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2416416A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:03:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EC443D5A for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:03:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1637179nzo for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:03:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=BlROlJCpt4+a9Gn2JUv8xU67zrPKxnybg2ISt1BQH2MinSdWJUZfm13cg7WNoELDgvwtrad0/NMz8obrk9bt6RbEgPcWAj0e1iATn2ncqCjUXVWJZyn9lH+wqnsyDXM+2sCB2Wo83DtrkJqPuzDvvhwZzWdDjApfZPs01znz9Vo= Received: by 10.36.148.14 with SMTP id v14mr5946751nzd; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:03:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ( [71.102.22.155]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 8sm10043363nzn.2005.12.28.14.03.16; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:03:17 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:03:11 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051228212030.GA87596@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20051228212030.GA87596@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512281403.14353.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Gary Kline Subject: Re: Ooo-2.0 build snafu... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:03:19 -0000 On Wednesday 28 December 2005 13:20, Gary Kline wrote: > I keep running into this build error with openoffice-2.0. > Just curious if this is a new error or not. Pointers welcome. > I'm running 5.3 on this particular server. > > thanks in advance, people, > > gary Looks like your are linking to the wrong threads library, was this machine upgraded from 4.* by any chance? Anyways my advice is to forcably rebuild all openoffice's dependencies so everthing is linked to the correct system libraries: cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portmanager && make install clean && rehash portmanager editors/openoffice.org-2.0 -f -l -Mike > > > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh > -L../../unxfbsd.pro/lib -L../lib > -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/solenv/unxfbsd/lib > -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/solver/680/unxfbsd.p >ro/lib > -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/solenv/unxfbsd/lib > -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/lib -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386 > -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/client > -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/native_threads -L/usr/X11R6/lib > ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libofficebean.so > Checking DLL ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libofficebean.so ...Fatal error > 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file > /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) > Abort trap (core dumped) > dmake: Error code 1, while making > '../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/libofficebean.so' > '---* tg_merge.mk *---' > > ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0/work/OOA680_m1/bean/native/unix > dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native' > '---* tg_merge.mk *---' > *** Error code 255 > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2.0. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 22:38:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A0916A41F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:38:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com (hosting-28.42.rev.fr.colt.net [213.41.42.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F0B43D53 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:38:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA08375838 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:38:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (freefugu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56407-07 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:37:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.bsdmon.com (14.128.101-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.101.128.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B653375834 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:37:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by sdf1.bsdmon.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 806DEB853; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:37:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:37:44 +0100 From: Gilbert Cao To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051228223743.GA1075@bsdmon.com> References: <20051228112558.GA79302@bsdmon.com> <20051228215353.GA8743@echobase.hoth.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051228215353.GA8743@echobase.hoth.dk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE i386 Organization: BSDMon X-GPG-Key: http://www.bsdmon.com/public_key.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdmon.com Subject: Re: Preserve date when cp over smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:38:15 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:53:53PM +0100, Martin P. Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gilbert Cao wrote: > > When I copy a single file with the cp utility, with -p flag, to > > a smbfs mounted directory, the modification datetime is not preserved a= nd it > > is set to the current datetime : >=20 > I've had this problem too, cp was also emitting a warning about utimes: >=20 > mph# mount -t smbfs -o-Eiso8859-1:cp850,-f660 //mph@light/e$ /mnt > mph% cp -p INFO /mnt > cp: utimes: /mnt/INFO: Operation not permitted I don't have this warning when copying files. All my mount directories are owned by my current (the one who does the copy) >=20 > This was because I wasn't ``owner'' of the files. Adding the -u flag fixe= d this. so, according to the mount_smbfs(8), the -u flag is not needed in my case. >=20 > mph# mount -t smbfs -o-Eiso8859-1:cp850,-f660,-umph //mph@light/e$ /mnt >=20 > Now my modification time is preserved. The problem still persists in my case : My samba server is a FreeBSD machine (//mph@light/e$ <- I guess it is a Windows machine) But I still don't know why modification time is preserved when copying with gqview ... --=20 -------------------------------- (hika) Gilbert Cao http://www.miaouirc.com - MiaouIRC Project 2002-2003 http://www.bsdmon.com - The BSD DMON Power to serve IRC : #miaule at IRCNET Network -------------------------------- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDsxO3SyQfFTqAEpcRAln1AKCIma0fWquWnZRgkY8tsxWIiJ3cDQCglj83 S+6GccqT3HgXi/3OX8PHPYA= =DhAO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 00:17:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207E816A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:17:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E18743D69 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:17:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B95ED2E567 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:17:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:17:39 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: RgI+2KyyrIimAAFLhuBPLqCMB8Pi5nmJItLqRgQLn0ys 1135815457 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-200-184.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.200.184]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57565703C1 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:17:37 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:17:36 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1135661999.43b0d3af7568e@www.c-inter.com.ar> <43B2D941.3080307@math.missouri.edu> <20051228220153.GA4337@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20051228220153.GA4337@lothlorien.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512290017.37588.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: compat 5x libraries missnig after restart X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:17:48 -0000 On Wednesday 28 December 2005 22:01, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 28 Dec Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > But why not put > > compat_xx_enable="YES" > > There's more wrong to the script. I have compat5x_enable="YES" in > /etc/rc.conf and the script start up, _BUT_ if I shut down (for whatever > reason) I get this console msg question: "compat5x.sh running?" > > Strange, it _is_ running, so why is it not "seen" Nothing is actually running, all the script actually does is run: /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib/compat which adds all of the compatibility libraries installed by all of the compat ports to a list of library locations. The old version simply had that one line. The error message is just a cosmetic problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 00:40:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BB416A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:40:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70BD43D46 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:40:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper [212.12.50.230]) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBT0dwaG083757; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:39:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9/Submit) id jBT0dvkV083756; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:39:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cracauer) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:39:57 -0500 From: Martin Cracauer To: Danial Thom Message-ID: <20051228193957.A83703@cons.org> References: <7.0.0.16.2.20051209043008.04db6550@Msdi.ca> <20051210164306.39668.qmail@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20051210164306.39668.qmail@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com>; from danial_thom@yahoo.com on Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 08:43:06AM -0800 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jiri Mikulas , Ian Lord Subject: Re: PCI-E 1x network adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:40:10 -0000 > > >I'm looking for PCI-Express 1x network adapter > > for FBSD-6 > > >I found adpaters only for PCI-X in > > documentation, > > >on google I didn't find much more :(... > > > > > >Is there any PCI-E adapter supported ? > > >Could you recommend me any adapter, plase ? > > >Thanks for reply. > > >Jiri > > > > We use Intel's dual ports gigabit adapters in > > dell's servers with > > freebsd 6 without any problem. > > > > They are supported by the "em" driver > > Note that 1x PCI-E isn't fast enough to fully > support gigabit speeds. Its about equivalent to > running on a 32bit bus performance-wise. You need > 4x to get full gig performance. No. PCI 32bit/33MHz is max 132 MB/sec. Here's PCIe speed: x1 5 Gbps 4 Gbps (500 MB/sec) x4 20 Gbps 16 Gbps (2 GB/sec) x8 40 Gbps 32 Gbps (4 GB/sec) x16 80 Gbps 64 Gbps (8 GB/sec) Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 01:25:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6C116A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jester@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5312643D55 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jester@panix.com) Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C31E9DCF6 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:25:46 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jester@localhost) by panix2.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id jBT1Pkl15554 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:25:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:25:46 -0500 From: Jesse Sheidlower To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051229012546.GA12029@panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Subject: Hard lockup with USB speakers after an hour X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:25:47 -0000 I'm trying to diagnose and fix a problem I'm having with my USB audio. After some difficulty getting things set up, I had managed to understand what I needed to do to get everything working. Now, when I listen to USB speakers, everything will work fine for an hour or so, and then I'll get a freeze so total that I can only fix it by pulling the power cord and battery out of my laptop. There doesn't seem to be anything specific that triggers this (it's not caused by adjusting the volume, or switching back to a different output device, it just happens in the middle of audio being played). There's nothing logged in /var/log/messages. What can I do to further diagnose this, and fix it? I'm running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE on an IBM ThinkPad X23; the speakers attach at pcm1. Thanks. Jesse Sheidlower From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 01:49:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EC916A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D3743D53 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1664414nzo for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:49:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=NWpcAuFahBp9aZT0P5QYfdPrXnwdrusGwXtclVb+pH+WE/q0jzRqCgySPIvdFnH9unL1kpS2Q6DDrm8p/ynWLtS5BElexUdheyAgzTP5sJ7jik4qgLY0Ymgb396o35dxLyl6HEAfNCt3HGBQdn7+x94RVKga9eP+WbLX0le1GVQ= Received: by 10.36.148.14 with SMTP id v14mr6140677nzd; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ( [71.102.22.155]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm777690nzp.2005.12.28.17.49.50; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:49:51 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:49:48 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051229012546.GA12029@panix.com> In-Reply-To: <20051229012546.GA12029@panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512281749.48934.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Jesse Sheidlower Subject: Re: Hard lockup with USB speakers after an hour X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:49:52 -0000 On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:25, Jesse Sheidlower wrote: > I'm trying to diagnose and fix a problem I'm having with my > USB audio. After some difficulty getting things set up, I had > managed to understand what I needed to do to get everything > working. Now, when I listen to USB speakers, everything will > work fine for an hour or so, and then I'll get a freeze so > total that I can only fix it by pulling the power cord and > battery out of my laptop. There doesn't seem to be anything > specific that triggers this (it's not caused by adjusting the > volume, or switching back to a different output device, it > just happens in the middle of audio being played). There's > nothing logged in /var/log/messages. > > What can I do to further diagnose this, and fix it? I'm > running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE on an IBM ThinkPad X23; the > speakers attach at pcm1. > > Thanks. > > Jesse Sheidlower Run top and see if something is hogging the cpu when it locks up.... -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 01:55:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123EA16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:55:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flashcode@free.fr) Received: from ml.free.fr (ml1.proxad.net [213.228.0.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0F143D49 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:55:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flashcode@free.fr) Received: from ml1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ml.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D76EC80B1 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:55:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from ml1 by ml1 (LISTAR/0.42); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:55:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:55:48 +0100 (CET) From: Listar To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-listar-antiloop: ml1 Precedence: list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Expiry-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:55:48 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Listar command results: -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar -- X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:55:50 -0000 Request received for list 'eci' via request address. >> hey its me, my old address dont work at time. i dont know why?! Unknown command. >> in the last days ive got some mails. i' think thaz your mails but im >> not sure! Unknown command. >> plz read and check ... Unknown command. >> cyaaaaaaa Unknown command. --- Gestionnaire de liste Listar/0.42 - fin de traitement/job execution complete. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 03:02:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B3716A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:02:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0636F43D48 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBT31xYN008775; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:01:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jBT31wdT008774; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:01:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:01:58 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: "Michael C. Shultz" Message-ID: <20051229030158.GA91953@thought.org> References: <20051228212030.GA87596@thought.org> <200512281403.14353.ringworm01@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512281403.14353.ringworm01@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 19 years of service to the Unix community Cc: Gary Kline , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ooo-2.0 build snafu... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:02:03 -0000 On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:03:11PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 13:20, Gary Kline wrote: > > I keep running into this build error with openoffice-2.0. > > Just curious if this is a new error or not. Pointers welcome. > > I'm running 5.3 on this particular server. > > > > thanks in advance, people, > > > > gary > > Looks like your are linking to the wrong threads library, was this machine > upgraded from 4.* by any chance? Anyways my advice is to forcably > rebuild all openoffice's dependencies so everthing is linked to the correct > system libraries: > > cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portmanager && make install clean && rehash > portmanager editors/openoffice.org-2.0 -f -l > > -Mike > > There may well have been some mis-linking. I'm test-installing Ooo-2.0 on my DNS server. I don't mess with it that much. Just make sure it kept fairly up-t-date and stable. thankee! gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 03:06:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2506816A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:06:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2637643D53 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:06:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so1064836wxc for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:06:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=AoTan0Ec8QgRyRVA0Z9r1eud7vj8QEznLZPSQUpu/GyeImWpshkyg438YcetVJf1gbVL7sHW47h1xZi79ICVWSd0qVqm7wMZpxvde/DKb5LTWUNuJIvtidqu14mhttVmH0V3CYkvqZt63cVJ5jN55pW/AdKPkZB8460iTLdL5XA= Received: by 10.70.28.17 with SMTP id b17mr8749771wxb; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:06:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ( [71.102.22.155]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h39sm4825197wxd.2005.12.28.19.06.01; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:06:02 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Gary Kline Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:05:56 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051228212030.GA87596@thought.org> <200512281403.14353.ringworm01@gmail.com> <20051229030158.GA91953@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20051229030158.GA91953@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512281905.57131.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ooo-2.0 build snafu... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:06:39 -0000 On Wednesday 28 December 2005 19:01, Gary Kline wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:03:11PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 13:20, Gary Kline wrote: > > > I keep running into this build error with openoffice-2.0. > > > Just curious if this is a new error or not. Pointers welcome. > > > I'm running 5.3 on this particular server. > > > > > > thanks in advance, people, > > > > > > gary > > > > Looks like your are linking to the wrong threads library, was this > > machine upgraded from 4.* by any chance? Anyways my advice is to > > forcably rebuild all openoffice's dependencies so everthing is linked to > > the correct system libraries: > > > > cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portmanager && make install clean && rehash > > portmanager editors/openoffice.org-2.0 -f -l > > > > -Mike > > There may well have been some mis-linking. I'm test-installing > Ooo-2.0 on my DNS server. I don't mess with it that much. Just > make sure it kept fairly up-t-date and stable. > > thankee! > > gary your welcome -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 05:42:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB04016A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 05:42:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (smtp.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A753A43D5A for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 05:42:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC771EEAB0 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:42:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30762-01 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:41:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.17.0.19] (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB181EE819 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:41:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43B37723.6010207@eskk.nu> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:41:55 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.05 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=0.050] X-Spam-Score: 0.05 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Installation of linux_base on 6.0-RELEASE-p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 05:42:05 -0000 Hi I've installed the linux_base but later found out that I needed the linux_base-8. I did a make deinstall for the linux_base and then I tried to install the linux_base-8. cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8 make install clean ===> Installing for linux_base-8-8.0_10 ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if emulators/linux_base-8 already installed kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3 redhat-release-8.0-8.noarch.rpm glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm glibc-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm setup-2.5.20-1.noarch.rpm filesystem-2.1.6-5.noarch.rpm basesystem-8.0-1.noarch.rpm libattr-2.0.8-3.i386.rpm libacl-2.0.11-2.i386.rpm libelf-0.8.2-2.i386.rpm bzip2-libs-1.0.2-5.i386.rpm termcap-11.0.1-13.noarch.rpm compat-db-3.3.11-2.i386.rpm db4-4.0.14-14.i386.rpm gdbm-1.8.0-18.i386.rpm glib-1.2.10-8.i386.rpm libtermcap-2.0.8-31.i386.rpm bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm bzip2-1.0.2-5.i386.rpm compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110.i386.rpm file /usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so from install of compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110 conflicts with file from package libstdc++-2.96-110 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8. I need to solve the conflict with libstdc but I can't find information on how. I would appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction. Thank you Leslie Jensen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 06:09:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252A016A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:09:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E4743D5C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:09:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBF573101 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:17:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50280-01 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:17:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1584B730BD for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:17:18 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Questions From: Joe Auty Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:09:15 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Subject: your advice on vinum, RAIDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:09:13 -0000 Hello, I've been considering buying another hard drive for my FreeBSD machine, and building a RAID with my current hard drive so that both drives are treated as one. Do any of you have experience in this area? Is this advisable? I'm assuming I'd be looking at creating a RAID-5? Can this be done without reformatting my current drive? Does this setup work well? Do you have any general advice for me? I need to know if there is risk involved here. Thanks in advance! ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 06:11:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C51716A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:11:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E8443D45 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:11:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBT6A0tH090377 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:10:00 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from imran@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBT69mx9090372 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:09:48 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:09:48 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200512290609.jBT69mx9090372@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: squid cache export X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:11:22 -0000 i am running squid on my freebsd 5.4 now i want to shift on freebsd 6.0 is there a way that I can import my old cached object on the new system cause i have a huge cache which i don't wanna lose. regards, imran imtiaz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 06:31:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A8816A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:31:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624ED43D62 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:31:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id jBT6VgSF075706; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:31:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:31:42 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Imran Imtiaz Message-ID: <20051229063142.GH39217@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200512290609.jBT69mx9090372@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512290609.jBT69mx9090372@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: squid cache export X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:31:53 -0000 In the last episode (Dec 29), Imran Imtiaz said: > i am running squid on my freebsd 5.4 now i want to shift on freebsd > 6.0 is there a way that I can import my old cached object on the new > system cause i have a huge cache which i don't wanna lose. Just copy your cache directory to the new server and make sure the new server's squid.conf cache settings match the old one. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 06:32:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB4616A43B for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:32:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0DC43D62 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:32:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1698928nzo for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:32:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=uPiktJ/CNQWGG67yG6euoIr39/yaND0+XUdSbapqo4d35CtQj8RdIrmseXJJWwvKkjSOjM+XV8UxxIjfyYWx7tMtkrZ3s6z0UB+9WHeR2aalpcd1rcIXDQnVjILOZdnDcvYygi9i0MEV37sbEbNSM4adbwAtroMPujqf868OYDQ= Received: by 10.65.177.14 with SMTP id e14mr2740200qbp; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:32:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.194.16 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:32:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e4453640512282232n1c5d8355ydbb0326b2e574e82@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:32:09 -0700 From: TuxGirl To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Mounting Canon Powershot Digital Camera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:32:10 -0000 I'm trying to figure out how to mount my camera, and I seem to be coming up empty. Here's the info that I got from attaching, and then detaching the camera from my system: Dec 28 23:18:41 amon-re kernel: ugen1: Canon Inc. Canon Digital Camera, rev 2.00/0.02, addr 2 Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: ugen1: at uhub4 port 4 (addr 2) disconnecte= d Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1.3 Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1.2 Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1.1 Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1 Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: ugen1: detached I'm running FreeBSD 6.0, and I'm fairly new to *bsd. I tried mounting /dev/ugen1 (which only exists when the camera is plugged in), as well as /dev/ugen.1, etc. I also tried /dev/usb.=20 Each of them complains that a block device is required. Someone on #freebsd suggested that i try giving it a -t flag, so I tried -t vfat (which apparently isn't correct on freebsd), then -t msdosfs, but received the same error with that. I'm feeling a bit stumped about this, currently. Thanks in advance, ~TuxGirl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 07:55:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C8D16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:55:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dawnshade@mail.ru) Received: from relay1.kaspersky-labs.com (relay1.kaspersky-labs.com [212.5.80.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D927043D5D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:55:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dawnshade@mail.ru) Received: from relay1.kaspersky-labs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1.kaspersky-labs.com (ESMTP) with SMTP id 5AFD7171AF for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:37:52 +0300 (MSK) Received: from antispam.localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1.kaspersky-labs.com (ESMTP) with SMTP id 01D401714D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:37:51 +0300 (MSK) Received: by relay1.kaspersky-labs.com (ESMTP, from userid 230) id B894117134; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:37:51 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mbx2.avp.ru (mx.avp.ru [212.5.80.15]) by relay1.kaspersky-labs.com (ESMTP) with ESMTP id 8E15C171A4 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:37:51 +0300 (MSK) Received: from moscow2.avp.ru ([10.64.0.4]) by mbx2.avp.ru with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:37:49 +0300 Received: from moscow.avp.ru ([10.64.0.3]) by moscow2.avp.ru with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:37:48 +0300 Received: from dawnshade-note.avp.ru ([172.16.128.10]) by moscow.avp.ru with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:31:10 +0300 From: dawnshade To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:32:19 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <6e4453640512282232n1c5d8355ydbb0326b2e574e82@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6e4453640512282232n1c5d8355ydbb0326b2e574e82@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512291032.19465.dawnshade@mail.ru> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2005 07:31:10.0907 (UTC) FILETIME=[D73098B0:01C60C49] X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release X-Spamtest-Info: Pass through X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for MailServers 5.5.2/RELEASE, bases: 29122005 #157907, status: clean Subject: Re: Mounting Canon Powershot Digital Camera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:55:48 -0000 On Thursday 29 December 2005 09:32, TuxGirl wrote: > I'm trying to figure out how to mount my camera, and I seem to be > coming up empty. Here's the info that I got from attaching, and then > detaching the camera from my system: > > Dec 28 23:18:41 amon-re kernel: ugen1: Canon Inc. Canon Digital > Camera, rev 2.00/0.02, addr 2 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: ugen1: at uhub4 port 4 (addr 2) > disconnected Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from > ugen1.3 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1.2 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1.1 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: ugen1: detached > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.0, and I'm fairly new to *bsd. > I tried mounting /dev/ugen1 (which only exists when the camera is > plugged in), as well as /dev/ugen.1, etc. I also tried /dev/usb. > Each of them complains that a block device is required. Someone on > #freebsd suggested that i try giving it a -t flag, so I tried -t vfat > (which apparently isn't correct on freebsd), then -t msdosfs, but > received the same error with that. > > I'm feeling a bit stumped about this, currently. for me work fine with Powershot A620. The same messages in dmesg, but digikam from ports detect camera and works fine. But don't forget give permissions you user to usb porta like described here http://www.gphoto.org/doc/manual/permissions-usb.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 08:00:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D1316A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:00:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@jumbledpile.com) Received: from host28.ipowerweb.com (host28.ipowerweb.com [66.235.216.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83E043D55 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@jumbledpile.com) Received: from adsl-66-159-200-171.dslextreme.com ([66.159.200.171]) by host28.ipowerweb.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ErsiB-00019k-3G; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:00:35 -0800 Message-ID: <43B397A9.8050800@jumbledpile.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:00:41 -0800 From: David Wilhelm User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051227) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: TuxGirl References: <6e4453640512282232n1c5d8355ydbb0326b2e574e82@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6e4453640512282232n1c5d8355ydbb0326b2e574e82@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host28.ipowerweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jumbledpile.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting Canon Powershot Digital Camera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:00:48 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/28/05 22:32, TuxGirl wrote: | I'm trying to figure out how to mount my camera, and I seem to be | coming up empty. If you're looking for *any* way to access the camera, as opposed to mounting it directly, try the graphics/gphoto2 port. It does command line (up|down)loading, includes a shell mode, and works fine with my PowerShot. | I tried mounting /dev/ugen1 (which only exists when the camera is | plugged in), as well as /dev/ugen.1, etc. I also tried /dev/usb. | Each of them complains that a block device is required. Someone on | #freebsd suggested that i try giving it a -t flag, so I tried -t vfat | (which apparently isn't correct on freebsd), then -t msdosfs, but | received the same error with that. I don't know if ugen can be used to mount the camera directly, since it's a generic USB device. Without specific drivers I think you need more than the mount command, but I'm no expert. Dave -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDs5cEqJ7Y53g8k+gRAgoBAKDZ1ZnIhe21fDSFRgnibvFSgQTRlgCg3IrC XPsYeLyIGQoRxjIpbm5w3Xo= =UbqL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 09:04:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4DD16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:04:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6336443D55 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:04:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBT97sP93245; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:07:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Brett Glass" , Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:04:31 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200512280535.WAA16578@lariat.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Sendmail X port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:04:39 -0000 I think the reason is that, according to the documentation located here: http://www.sendmail.org/sm-X/index.html "...but it does not provide any mail content modification capabilities, e.g., masquerading of addresses or changing (addition, removal) of headers. Later versions will probably add such capabilities..." "...sendmail X.0 comes with a policy mail filter library (libpmilter) which offers similar features as libmilter known from sendmail 8, however, without mail content modification capabilities (as mentioned before..." In other words, to use it, a site needs to totally chuck out all existing configuration, all institutional knowledge and experience with the existing sendmail. And in additon we have to push all our e-mail scanners into the local delivery program. Well I don't know about you but we happen to use sendmail plus clamav to prefilter mail that's relayed to icky Exchange servers for some customers, and the mail doesen't even go through the local delivery program. So this release would be basically impossible to use, for us. I don't see that Sendmail X is the successor to Sendmail 8.13 Instead I see it as a parallel product. And why not? Plenty of people with very basic mail needs have been bitching about a simplified Sendmail in the past. It makes sense that Sendmail Inc would try to market to that crowd. If your happy enough with using procmail as the local delivery agent (and I understand most Linux distros do that) and calling various scanners out of the procmail config, then this may work out for you. But I would bet that 90% of the people running FreeBSD mailservers would not find anything compelling about this release. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Brett Glass >Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 9:36 PM >To: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Sendmail X port > > >I don't see Sendmail X available as a port or package. I'm >interested in trying >this version because it's the first to eliminate the horribly >cryptic system of >m4 macros, "classes", and address parsing rules that configured >earlier versions. >Is there a reason why it's not available as a package or port >for FreeBSD? > >--Brett Glass >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.8/215 - Release Date: >12/27/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 09:11:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C68416A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:11:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1684243D60 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:11:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 3100 invoked by uid 510); 29 Dec 2005 09:14:22 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.158575 secs); 29 Dec 2005 09:14:22 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.158575 secs Process 3093) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 09:14:21 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: Joe Auty In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1135847660.2006.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:14:21 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: your advice on vinum, RAIDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:11:57 -0000 On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 06:09, Joe Auty wrote: > Hello, > > I've been considering buying another hard drive for my FreeBSD > machine, and building a RAID with my current hard drive so that both > drives are treated as one. > > Do any of you have experience in this area? Is this advisable? I'm > assuming I'd be looking at creating a RAID-5? Can this be done > without reformatting my current drive? Does this setup work well? Do > you have any general advice for me? I need to know if there is risk > involved here. > > > > Thanks in advance! Joe, It depends on what you need to do. If you just want data integrity then you need raid 1 - mirroring and GEOM is your friend. There is a good section in the Handbook on setting a GEOM raid 1 without formatting the original drive. If you are also looking for more drive space, then raid 5 gives a measure of both. In both cases, the warning of backing up the system first applies. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 09:24:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC75416A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:24:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from mail.duras.ro (mail.duras.ro [86.105.56.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB08243D5C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:24:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229837CAA2 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:24:11 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.duras.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32382-10 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:24:10 +0200 (EET) Received: from [86.105.56.194] (ma.plimb.cu.barca.prin.padure.ro [86.105.56.194]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D317AEB0 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:24:09 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <43B3AAD2.4030703@duras.ro> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:22:26 +0200 From: Mihai Tanasescu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (RedHat) at duras.ro Subject: Systat -ip 1 strange problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:24:13 -0000 Hello, Don't know if this is the right list to post this problem, but I hope I'm not too far off: I have a Compaq Proliant ML 350 machine with 3 x fxp and 2 x em network cards. If I issue : systat -ip 1 I see: 866056packets forwarded 0 - no checksum the same for systat -ip 2. For systat -ip 3 (and higher): 83537 packets forwarded 0 - no checksum - these are the correct figures I really don't have the figures reported for refresh-interval = 1 or 2 and have just installed Freebsd 5.4 on it. (The same problem manifests with Freebsd 6.0 on that box). A friend of mine has a similar setup (but not a Compaq box) and doesn't see strange values for -ip 1 and -ip 2. Any clue on what's happening or what's causing this ? Thanks, Mihai From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 10:19:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01A316A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:19:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from boisan@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D0D43D53 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:19:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from boisan@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o60so93447nfa for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:19:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=uOUCRLVbjtEP+nre0efdrUd/3izomfn5FX0W0cnBftSZUWZ2JMVIIItQKCNXw5YwTtgMTFhgF2MJQCIvFiUmtJ3tGh9UqfTjxcwaa3w84/wVa4w0I+urQhme2fXdBN/fX/nm7PduJnWL1RfnRAitMatgAuzBbxe9dQJvbGol7/0= Received: by 10.48.246.4 with SMTP id t4mr351741nfh; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:19:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.41.9 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:19:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:19:10 +0100 From: Angel Blazquez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: nfs server overload (nfsd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:19:13 -0000 Hello, We are expecting incredible overload in a NFS server. A top shows nfsd consuming most of the CPU: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMA= ND 6000 root -8 0 1204K 660K biord 1 124:15 27.88% 27.88% nfsd 6002 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 124:18 17.58% 17.58% nfsd 6006 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:38 10.21% 10.21% nfsd 6005 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:36 7.47% 7.47% nfsd 6003 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:08 4.15% 4.15% nfsd 6001 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:16 2.83% 2.83% nfsd Memory looks fine: Mem: 27M Active, 910M Inact, 136M Wired, 51M Cache, 112M Buf, 1828K Free Swap: 2048M Total, 72K Used, 2048M Free Typing in the nfs server (console/ssh) becomes terrible, the server does not reply well. We are running this nfs server in FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 on a Compaq Proliant server with a Compaq Smart Array 5300 that comunicates with a array of disks: /dev/da0s1d 164G 124G 27G 82% /data0 /dev/da1s1d 131G 80G 41G 66% /data1 We have /data0 and /data1 exported: /data0 -maproot=3Droot -alldirs -network 192.168.62.0 -mask 255.255.255.0 /data1 -maproot=3Droot -alldirs -network 192.168.62.0 -mask 255.255.255.0 so a couple of incoming SMTP servers we have can deliver e-mail to those filesystems. We are running exim 4.60.0 in those other servers, 4.10-RELEASE-p5 in one of them, and FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0 in the other one. If we stop exim delivering e-mail, nfs server does well, the cpu gets free, and the nfs server works fine (replies to user interaction, etc). FreeBSD 6.0 sysctl output (nfs related): vfs.nfs4.access_cache_timeout: 60 vfs.nfs4.nfsv3_commit_on_close: 0 vfs.nfs.downdelayinitial: 12 vfs.nfs.downdelayinterval: 30 vfs.nfs.realign_test: 1294030 vfs.nfs.realign_count: 0 vfs.nfs.bufpackets: 4 vfs.nfs.reconnects: 2 vfs.nfs.iodmaxidle: 120 vfs.nfs.iodmin: 4 vfs.nfs.iodmax: 20 vfs.nfs.defect: 0 vfs.nfs.nfs_ip_paranoia: 1 vfs.nfs.diskless_valid: 0 vfs.nfs.diskless_rootpath: vfs.nfs.access_cache_timeout: 2 vfs.nfs.nfsv3_commit_on_close: 0 vfs.nfs.clean_pages_on_close: 1 vfs.nfs.nfs_directio_enable: 0 vfs.nfs.nfs_directio_allow_mmap: 1 vfs.nfsrv.nfs_privport: 0 vfs.nfsrv.async: 0 vfs.nfsrv.commit_blks: 0 vfs.nfsrv.commit_miss: 0 vfs.nfsrv.realign_test: 0 vfs.nfsrv.realign_count: 0 vfs.nfsrv.gatherdelay: 10000 vfs.nfsrv.gatherdelay_v3: 0 FreeBSD 4.10 sysctl output (nfs related): vfs.nfs.nfs_privport: 0 vfs.nfs.async: 0 vfs.nfs.commit_blks: 0 vfs.nfs.commit_miss: 0 vfs.nfs.realign_test: 84602323 vfs.nfs.realign_count: 99713 vfs.nfs.bufpackets: 4 vfs.nfs.gatherdelay: 10000 vfs.nfs.gatherdelay_v3: 0 vfs.nfs.defect: 0 vfs.nfs.nfs_ip_paranoia: 1 vfs.nfs.diskless_valid: 0 vfs.nfs.diskless_rootpath: vfs.nfs.diskless_swappath: vfs.nfs.access_cache_timeout: 2 vfs.nfs.nfsv3_commit_on_close: 0 This couple of servers mounts the filesystems with this options: 192.168.62.54:/data1 /mail nfs =20 rw,nfsv3,intr,dumbtimer,rdirplus,nosuid,nodev 0 0 192.168.62.54:/data0 /data0 nfs =20 rw,nfsv3,intr,dumbtimer,rdirplus,nosuid,nodev 0 0 On the server, sysctl nfs related output looks like this: vfs.nfs.downdelayinitial: 12 vfs.nfs.downdelayinterval: 30 vfs.nfs.realign_test: 2694 vfs.nfs.realign_count: 0 vfs.nfs.bufpackets: 4 vfs.nfs.reconnects: 2 vfs.nfs.iodmaxidle: 120 vfs.nfs.iodmin: 4 vfs.nfs.iodmax: 20 vfs.nfs.defect: 0 vfs.nfs.nfs_ip_paranoia: 1 vfs.nfs.diskless_valid: 0 vfs.nfs.diskless_rootpath: vfs.nfs.access_cache_timeout: 2 vfs.nfs.nfsv3_commit_on_close: 0 vfs.nfs4.access_cache_timeout: 60 vfs.nfs4.nfsv3_commit_on_close: 0 vfs.nfsrv.nfs_privport: 0 vfs.nfsrv.async: 1 vfs.nfsrv.commit_blks: 579238 vfs.nfsrv.commit_miss: 413059 vfs.nfsrv.realign_test: 88269083 vfs.nfsrv.realign_count: 11961 vfs.nfsrv.gatherdelay: 10000 vfs.nfsrv.gatherdelay_v3: 0 debug.hashstat.nfsnode: 65536 5 1 0 Thanks in advance, Best regards, Angel Blazquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 11:21:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E8316A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:21:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B8F43D53 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:21:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:24413 helo=[192.168.1.33]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Ervq7-0003ru-LJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:20:59 +0000 From: Kiffin Gish To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:21:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1135855260.1034.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Using SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:21:01 -0000 I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 6.0 and noticed the introduction of option SCHED_ULE for supporting multi-processor environments. However, I understood that using SCHED_ULE with only one CPU can also improve performance significantly. Is this true, and if so, what are the risks involved dropping good old SCHED_4BSD for the new-and-improved scheduler? Thanks alot in advance. -- Kiffin Gish From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 12:18:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733DB16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:18:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD81843D5F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:17:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IS9002VYEDW9KB0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:22:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:17:55 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:17:55 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: Subject: Weird database error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:18:00 -0000 Hello! I have a serious problem. I am running a regular FreeBSD 4.11 jail, under which I've installed mysql-client-5.0.16 and mysql-server-5.0.16 plus the PHP modules and extensions. I've created a database like this: CREATE DATABASE msc; GRANT USAGE ON msc.* TO msc@localhost IDENTIFIED BY 'aheeem'; GRANT ALL ON msc.* TO msc@localhost; and then proceeded to install WordPress (the publishing platform). The installation was flawless! Here's the actual problem. Every morning when I wake up, WordPress has an "Error establishing the database connection". And that makes no sense, because I have not been messing with the database nor with WordPress. The database is still there. Now, the _strange_ thing is, that shortly after (from 5 to 15 minutes) I've logged onto my FreeBSD jail via SSH (and also mysql -u root -p to check if the database is still there), WordPress can mysteriously re-establish the database connection. That is, I just click Firefox's reload. What is going on ;) Thanks a lot, Kristian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 13:15:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B5716A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:15:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5B2643D49 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:15:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 52250 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 13:15:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=x1oDBZo7QyXaT98DNtZhIMbnK0c/90xZY3DvGyOeJzeRRLV9rxEl/KqPMFpFsO0zjSt8tyrKDY1kUgahqzx/lzuaycChHSt7ySDp1HKJaMnvOx17zezE+EQpK/73ewPLYnJtVFN1D/ltcg67//HYwpjyv7yE+vwAbMNLdci2GvE= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 13:15:53 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: TuxGirl In-Reply-To: <6e4453640512282232n1c5d8355ydbb0326b2e574e82@mail.gmail.com> References: <6e4453640512282232n1c5d8355ydbb0326b2e574e82@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:15:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1135862151.98495.14.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting Canon Powershot Digital Camera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:15:55 -0000 On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 23:32 -0700, TuxGirl wrote: > I'm trying to figure out how to mount my camera, and I seem to be > coming up empty. Here's the info that I got from attaching, and then > detaching the camera from my system: > > Dec 28 23:18:41 amon-re kernel: ugen1: Canon Inc. Canon Digital > Camera, rev 2.00/0.02, addr 2 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: ugen1: at uhub4 port 4 (addr 2) disconnected > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1.3 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1.2 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1.1 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: All threads purged from ugen1 > Dec 28 23:18:43 amon-re kernel: ugen1: detached > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.0, and I'm fairly new to *bsd. > I tried mounting /dev/ugen1 (which only exists when the camera is > plugged in), as well as /dev/ugen.1, etc. I also tried /dev/usb. > Each of them complains that a block device is required. Someone on > #freebsd suggested that i try giving it a -t flag, so I tried -t vfat > (which apparently isn't correct on freebsd), then -t msdosfs, but > received the same error with that. > > I'm feeling a bit stumped about this, currently. > > Thanks in advance, > ~TuxGirl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I found it much easier to buy a USB card reader, which can then be mounted as 'mount -t msdos /dev/da0s1 /mnt'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:01:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF2A16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:01:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johan.spee@wanadoo.nl) Received: from smtp08.wanadoo.nl (smtp08.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966E843D48 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:01:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johan.spee@wanadoo.nl) Received: from unknown (adsl-dc-45560.adsl.wanadoo.nl [83.118.243.96]) by smtp8.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E18C5032E; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:01:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:01:52 +0100 From: Johan Spee To: dawnshade@mail.ru Message-Id: <20051229150152.a6ce7c6b.johan.spee@wanadoo.nl> X-Gratia: Eve ryth ingis gon nabeal right X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.1.7 (FreeBSD 6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting Canon Powershot Digital Camera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:01:48 -0000 The bad news is: You can't mount a Powershot because it does not work in USB mass storage mode (it uses PTP: picture transfer protocol). The good news is: You don't have to because gphoto2 (http://www.gphoto.org/) can access PTP cameras without mounting or unmounting on your part. gtkam (http://www.gphoto.org/proj/gtkam/) is a nice, simple GUI for gphoto. Both programs are in the ports. If you want you CAN mount your flash-card though. But you'll have to take it out of the camera and put it in a flash-card drive (or whatever it's called). -- Johan Spee From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:11:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C871016A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:11:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1398243D49 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:11:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: (qmail 19011 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 14:11:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 14:11:39 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 217.196.247.135 Message-ID: <43B3EE9B.8000105@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:11:39 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: inetd[469] messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:11:40 -0000 Hi, I've recently installed/upgraded to freebsd 6.0 from freebsd 4.9. Most things have gone very smoothly and I thank the developers. However, I'm seeing a lot of these messages in the system log Dec 29 02:41:46 www inetd[469]: ssh/tcp: bind: Address already in use It seems like these are every 10 minutes. I suppose it's something obvious, but I don't know what. Can anyone help? -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:12:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAE516A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:12:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net (pih-relay05.plus.net [212.159.14.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95AA43D49 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from movens.plus.com ([80.229.231.20] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1EryWN-0004Me-LR; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:12:47 +0000 Message-ID: <43B3EEF9.3010004@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:13:13 +0000 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200512071741.03088.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200512071741.03088.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eoghan , Kent Stewart Subject: Re: pkgdb format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:12:53 -0000 Kent Stewart wrote: > On Wednesday 07 December 2005 12:55 pm, eoghan wrote: >> Hello >> Ive recently upgraded to 6.0 and I decided to upgrade my ports... So >> I ran a: >> portupgrade -af >> Its running fine, but each time its upgrade a port I get: >> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... Failed >> `Inappropriate file type or format'; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the >> pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 439 packages found (-0 >> +439) >> >> Just wondering if its to do with my upgrade to 6.0 (from 5.4) >> Thanks > > > Not from my experience. You are setting the package database interface > one way in one spot and using the default someplace else. Since they > are incompatible, it has to rebuild the port data base. Look for the > string bdb in your scripts and in pkgtools.conf. > I've got the same problem running `portupgrade -af' after upgrading from 5.4 -> 6 After reading this thread, I killed the upgrade, deleted INDEX-6, INDEX-6.db, and pkgdb.db; rebuilt pkgdb.db using `pkgdb -u' and re-ran `portupgrade -af' It started off OK (using dbm_hash) but after a couple of hours it had started continually rebuilding pkgdb.db. The sequence is: Build new version of port Rebuild pkgdb.db in bdb1_btree format Backup old version of port Rebuild pkgdb.db in dbm_hash format Uninstall old version of port Rebuild pkgdb.db in bdb1_btree format Deinstall Clean Rebuild pkgdb.db in dmb_hash format It is rebuilding pkgdb.db *4 times per port* which will add several hours to the build time. The fact that Kent hasn't had this problem and that the upgrade started off correctly for me suggests that it goes wrong when a particular port gets installed. OP: Did you find a solution to this? Kent: I don't have the string bdb in pkgtools.conf, nor anywhere else I can think to look, except INDEX-6.db - but that was built when portupgrade started and things worked OK at first. Anyone else got any ideas? Regards and a Happy New Year Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:14:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33016A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:14:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76B643D6D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:14:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA10642 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:12:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma010632; Thu, 29 Dec 05 15:11:59 +0100 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (rebelion.Sisis.de [193.31.10.34]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA20956 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:13:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBTEEAns008243 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:14:10 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (i386) Subject: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:14:31 -0000 Hi, I'm installing a brand new notebook and have to do it with 6.0-REL because the SATA support; so I can't use my 1 GByte distfiles of the 5.4-REL which I have on the older notebook; is there somehow a place to download isos of the distfiles? I know that I could buy them but not right now here in Germany before the weekend :-( Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH ein Tochterunternehmen der OCLC PICA B.V. Leiden (NL) D-82041 Oberhaching, Gruenwalder Weg 28g Fon: +49 89 / 61308-351, Fax: -399, Mobile +49 170 4527211 http://www.sisis.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:14:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187AF16A431 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rseals@vdsi.net) Received: from broad.100mwh.com (broad.100mwh.com [205.214.86.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DC043D76 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:14:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rseals@vdsi.net) Received: from static-70-22-125-177.balt.east.verizon.net ([70.22.125.177] helo=stlmofaxtest.mbh.mhs.magellanhs.com) by broad.100mwh.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EryY9-00012a-JQ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:14:15 -0600 From: Ray Seals To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20051228204256.GG39217@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1135797945.645.8.camel@localhost> <20051228204256.GG39217@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Virtual Data Systems, Inc. Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:14:52 -0600 Message-Id: <1135865692.633.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - broad.100mwh.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vdsi.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Is there a Freebsd equivalent to this Linux header file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rseals@vdsi.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:14:48 -0000 On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 14:42 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > That's probably a Linux-specific ioctl. Chances are that FreeBSD's > ifconfig command will do what you want (so its sources are a good place > to start looking); what do you mean by "change it's operating mode"? > Here is a snippet from the specs PDF: Niagara 2261 is a dual Giga bit NIC card with programmable Close or Open while in the power off state. The Niagara 2261 is a universal low profile PCI-X board based on Intel 82546 Dual Gigabit Ethernet controller. Niagara 2261 is designed to operate either in 64-bit or 32-bit mode with the bus speeds up to 133 MHz. The physical form factor for Niagara 2261 meets the requirements of PCI Local Bus specifications Rev2.2 as well as Low profile PCI specifications. Feature Summary - Programmable Close or Open while in the power off state. - Intel s 82546EB controller - Two integrated PHYs for 10/100/1000 Mb/s full- and half-duplex operation - Bypass - during power off or software failures - PCI 2.2 compatible, 32/64-bit, 33/66/133MHz - IEEE 802.3ab, 802.3u, 802.3x compliant - Host offloading options - TCP/IP/UDP checksum, TCP segmentation and advanced packet filtering - Plug and Play - Software support for, Linux 2.2.x and 2.4.x, FreeBSD 4.x and Solaris 7 and 8 running x86-based platforms - Two RJ45 Connectors So, it can do a lot of cool things, but at this point I just wanted to set the box up as an in-line sniffer using this card for tcpdump only and the other built in nic (on the PC) as the management port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:22:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3298B16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:22:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C36C43D9C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:22:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: (qmail 21110 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 14:22:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 14:22:36 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 217.196.247.135 Message-ID: <43B3F12B.7010307@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:22:35 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: sudo TTY Unknown messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:22:38 -0000 I am getting messages from sudo concerning an unknown TTY. eg Dec 29 02:30:40 www sudo: root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/usr/tmp/BU/svn_backups ; USER=www ; COMMAND=/usr/local/bin/svnadmin dump -q -r0:19591 /svn/private I think this is caused by not having a tty device in the root cron job. I would prefer to keep only one main cron job for my system or is that frowned upon. -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:25:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413E916A423 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:25:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892DC43D78 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:25:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 26094 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 14:25:36 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Dec 2005 14:25:36 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4149E28423; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:25:35 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Mike Esquardez" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 29 Dec 2005 09:25:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44y824q8tc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 55 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnokii SMSD and Ports Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:25:58 -0000 "Mike Esquardez" writes: > Hello everybody. I am trying to work out how to install SMSD from > ports and not having much luck. I'm jut learning FreeBSD, so my > knowledge of ports is not very good. When I make, make install, it > only installs Gnokii. After looking around I found the file > /usr/ports/comms/gnokii/files/patch-smsd-Makefile and also README > under /work/smsd. I am totally lost and confused. Google has proved > not so good for this issue. > > ========================================== > COMPILATION > > SMSD is not compiled by default with gnokii 'make' command. You must > compile it > manually by typing 'make' in smsd directory. But before SMSD compilation > you must right configure gnokii (autoconf, configure). > > For example: > (in gnokii directory) > gettextize # only for CVS copies > autoconf # only for CVS copies > autoheader # only for CVS copies > ./configure > [ If you use latest Red Hat with new (0.11) gettext version ] > [ run autogen.sh with configure options instead of the ] > [ above commands. It will do all needed things. ] > cd smsd > vi Makefile (edit paths in "DB Modules" section) > make > make libpq.la OR make libmysql.la OR make libfile.la > make install > > Note that you can build all of the modules (libpq, libmysql and libfile) but > you should use just one. > ========================================== > > I have installed RPM and Debs before, but I've never had to do > anything other than make, make install. Can anyone be so kind enough > to explain what the above instructions mean? And what the > "/usr/ports/comms/gnokii/files/patch-smsd-Makefile" file is for and > how to use it? You don't need to look that deep into it; just check out the /usr/ports/comms/gnokii/Makefile and you'll see that what you need is to build with "WITH_SMSD". So just do the following: $ cd /usr/ports/comms/gnokii $ make clean && make -DWITH_SMSD install and you will end up with /usr/local/sbin/smsd -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:28:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D4F16A428; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:28:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd3mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C04F43D7B; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:27:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd4mr7so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr7so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.84]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IS9007RHK5AOAC0@l-daemon>; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:27:10 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml1so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.145]) by pd4mr7so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IS90029TK5AYGG0@pd4mr7so.prod.shaw.ca>; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:27:10 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.0.60] ([24.87.209.6]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IS900JAWK5AZCJ2@l-daemon>; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:27:10 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:26:53 -0800 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <43B3EEF9.3010004@freebsd.org> To: Mark Ovens Message-id: <43B3F22D.5070601@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 References: <200512071741.03088.kstewart@owt.com> <43B3EEF9.3010004@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kent Stewart , eoghan Subject: Re: pkgdb format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:28:58 -0000 Mark Ovens wrote: > After reading this thread, I killed the upgrade, deleted INDEX-6, > INDEX-6.db, and pkgdb.db; rebuilt pkgdb.db using `pkgdb -u' and re-ran > `portupgrade -af' > > It started off OK (using dbm_hash) but after a couple of hours it had > started continually rebuilding pkgdb.db. > > Anyone else got any ideas? I had exactly the same problem during portupgrading after a 5.4->6.0 base system upgrade until I did a `portupgrade -fR portupgrade`, at which point it stopped (and has been fine ever since). I have no idea what the problem is or why this would fix it, but you might like to try this and see if it helps. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:31:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1B116A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:31:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AF643D48 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3C65D69; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:31:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56076-06; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:31:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0DA5C8C; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:31:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B3F341.5030906@mac.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:31:29 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Auty References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: your advice on vinum, RAIDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:31:14 -0000 Joe Auty wrote: > I've been considering buying another hard drive for my FreeBSD machine, > and building a RAID with my current hard drive so that both drives are > treated as one. This is known as RAID-1 mirroring. > Do any of you have experience in this area? Is this advisable? Yes and yes. :-) > I'm assuming I'd be looking at creating a RAID-5? Not with only two drives. RAID-5 needs at least 3, and is wasteful unless you have 4-5. > Can this be done without reformatting my current drive? You can set up mirroring without reformatting, but be sure you have good backups of your data regardless. > Does this setup work well? Do you have any general advice for me? I need to > know if there is risk involved here. When choosing RAID levels, you are making a tradeoff between performance, reliability, and cost: If you prefer... ...consider using: ----------------------------------------------- performance, reliability: RAID-1 mirroring performance, cost: RAID-0 striping reliability, performance: RAID-1 mirroring (+ hot spare, if possible) reliability, cost: RAID-5 (+ hot spare) cost, reliability: RAID-5 cost, performance: RAID-0 striping If you've got enough drives, using RAID-10 or RAID-50 will also improve performance compared to stock RAID-1 or RAID-5 modes. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:44:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9509E16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DCF43D58 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jBTEitiU000058; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:44:55 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jBTEitcK000056; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:44:55 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200512291444.jBTEitcK000056@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: guru@Sisis.de Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:44:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:44:57 -0000 > > > Hi, > > I'm installing a brand new notebook and have to do it with 6.0-REL > because the SATA support; so I can't use my 1 GByte distfiles of > the 5.4-REL which I have on the older notebook; is there somehow > a place to download isos of the distfiles? I know that I could buy > them but not right now here in Germany before the weekend :-( Check out the handbook on the FreeBSD website. IT will tell you what you need to know. Anyway, the ISOs are all available at ftp.freebsd.org There are mirror sites in various places around the world too. Log in as anonymous with a password of your Email address. ////jerry > > Thx > matthias > -- > Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH > ein Tochterunternehmen der OCLC PICA B.V. Leiden (NL) > D-82041 Oberhaching, Gruenwalder Weg 28g > Fon: +49 89 / 61308-351, Fax: -399, Mobile +49 170 4527211 > http://www.sisis.de/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:56:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC2116A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:56:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A4C43D45 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:56:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA11797; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:54:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma011789; Thu, 29 Dec 05 15:54:02 +0100 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (rebelion.Sisis.de [193.31.10.34]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA21471; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:56:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBTEuCIn010232; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:56:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:56:12 +0100 To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20051229145612.GA9851@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200512291444.jBTEitcK000056@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200512291444.jBTEitcK000056@clunix.cl.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (i386) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:56:30 -0000 El día Thursday, December 29, 2005 a las 09:44:54AM -0500, Jerry McAllister escribió: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm installing a brand new notebook and have to do it with 6.0-REL > > because the SATA support; so I can't use my 1 GByte distfiles of > > the 5.4-REL which I have on the older notebook; is there somehow > > a place to download isos of the distfiles? I know that I could buy > > them but not right now here in Germany before the weekend :-( > > Check out the handbook on the FreeBSD website. IT will tell you what > you need to know. That's exactly what I did before: reading chap. "4.5.2.1 Installing Ports from a CD-ROM" and so I know what I do and what I'm asking for (it's not the 1st FreeBSD installation); > Anyway, the ISOs are all available at ftp.freebsd.org > There are mirror sites in various places around the world too. > Log in as anonymous with a password of your Email address. that was the second step looking around below ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0 (and other places) but I only see the isos for CD1, CD2 and CD-bootonly, but not the ports; Pls. be so kind and send me the correct URL. Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH ein Tochterunternehmen der OCLC PICA B.V. Leiden (NL) D-82041 Oberhaching, Gruenwalder Weg 28g Fon: +49 89 / 61308-351, Fax: -399, Mobile +49 170 4527211 http://www.sisis.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 14:59:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D391316A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:59:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C27343D5E for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:59:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 4370 invoked by uid 207); 29 Dec 2005 14:59:30 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.30/3.97. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.240):. Processed in 0.08851 secs); 29 Dec 2005 14:59:30 -0000 Received: from dialup240.ach.sch.gr (HELO flame.pc) ([81.186.70.240]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Dec 2005 14:59:29 -0000 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7C1221178B; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:58:14 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:58:14 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: guru@Sisis.de Message-ID: <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:59:38 -0000 On 2005-12-29 15:14, guru@Sisis.de wrote: > I'm installing a brand new notebook and have to do it with 6.0-REL > because the SATA support; so I can't use my 1 GByte distfiles of the > 5.4-REL which I have on the older notebook; is there somehow a place > to download isos of the distfiles? I know that I could buy them but > not right now here in Germany before the weekend :-( The distfiles are the sources of the ported programs. They are not specific to a single release. You can just copy over the distfiles from the older notebook and rebuild your ports. There is no such thing as "an ISO of distfiles". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:05:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181B016A420 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:05:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CC143D49 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2902F730C6; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:13:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59308-10; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:13:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82413730AA; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:13:16 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1135847660.2006.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> References: <1135847660.2006.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <336CE4EB-C1F3-4C6E-8057-1F068BFEE3BA@netmusician.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:05:00 -0500 To: Robert Slade X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: your advice on vinum, RAIDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:05:07 -0000 On Dec 29, 2005, at 4:14 AM, Robert Slade wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 06:09, Joe Auty wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've been considering buying another hard drive for my FreeBSD >> machine, and building a RAID with my current hard drive so that both >> drives are treated as one. >> >> Do any of you have experience in this area? Is this advisable? I'm >> assuming I'd be looking at creating a RAID-5? Can this be done >> without reformatting my current drive? Does this setup work well? Do >> you have any general advice for me? I need to know if there is risk >> involved here. >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance! > > Joe, > > It depends on what you need to do. If you just want data integrity > then > you need raid 1 - mirroring and GEOM is your friend. There is a good > section in the Handbook on setting a GEOM raid 1 without formatting > the > original drive. > > > If you are also looking for more drive space, then raid 5 gives a > measure of both. > > In both cases, the warning of backing up the system first applies. > Hmmm..... What I need is more drive space. Should I look at GEOM rather than vinum? Do you know whether the drives would need to be reformatted in order to setup the RAID? I'll definitely heed your advice on backing up the drive first! ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:09:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB89D16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:09:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0A143D4C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:09:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id jBTF9e0n043310; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:09:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:09:40 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Ray Seals Message-ID: <20051229150940.GI39217@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1135797945.645.8.camel@localhost> <20051228204256.GG39217@dan.emsphone.com> <1135865692.633.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1135865692.633.4.camel@localhost> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Is there a Freebsd equivalent to this Linux header file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:09:44 -0000 In the last episode (Dec 29), Ray Seals said: > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 14:42 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > > That's probably a Linux-specific ioctl. Chances are that FreeBSD's > > ifconfig command will do what you want (so its sources are a good > > place to start looking); what do you mean by "change it's operating > > mode"? > > Here is a snippet from the specs PDF: > > Feature Summary ... none of which should require a custom ioctl, though. > So, it can do a lot of cool things, but at this point I just wanted > to set the box up as an in-line sniffer using this card for tcpdump > only and the other built in nic (on the PC) as the management port. So plug it in and run tcpdump :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:10:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F79B16A431 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:10:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B5B43D64 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:09:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA12138; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:07:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma012132; Thu, 29 Dec 05 16:07:49 +0100 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (rebelion.Sisis.de [193.31.10.34]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA21605; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:09:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBTFA0fd010828; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:10:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:10:00 +0100 To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (i386) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:10:00 -0000 El día Thursday, December 29, 2005 a las 04:58:14PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas escribió: > On 2005-12-29 15:14, guru@Sisis.de wrote: > > I'm installing a brand new notebook and have to do it with 6.0-REL > > because the SATA support; so I can't use my 1 GByte distfiles of the > > 5.4-REL which I have on the older notebook; is there somehow a place > > to download isos of the distfiles? I know that I could buy them but > > not right now here in Germany before the weekend :-( > > The distfiles are the sources of the ported programs. I know. > They are > not specific to a single release. You can just copy over the > distfiles from the older notebook and rebuild your ports. That's not true. I copied over the /usr/ports/distfiles from my 5.4-REL to the 6.0-REL but the ports-collection which comes with 6.0-REL will use other sources while doing 'make install' in /usr/ports/x11/kde: 5.4-REL: $ ls -lutr libtoo* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2699923 29 dic 13:17 libtool-1.5.10.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 538884 29 dic 13:18 libtool-1.3.5.tar.gz $ cd KDE $ ls -lutr kdeba* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 22670772 29 dic 13:18 kdebase-3.4.0.tar.bz2 6.0-REL: $ ls -lutr libtoo* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2699923 Dec 29 13:17 libtool-1.5.10.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2780846 Dec 29 13:28 libtool-1.5.18.tar.gz ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 538884 Dec 29 14:10 libtool-1.3.5.tar.gz $ cd KDE $ ls -lutr kdeba* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 22670772 Dec 29 13:18 kdebase-3.4.0.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 22466433 Dec 29 15:37 kdebase-3.4.2.tar.bz2 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > There is no such thing as "an ISO of distfiles". Thx. matthias -- Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH ein Tochterunternehmen der OCLC PICA B.V. Leiden (NL) D-82041 Oberhaching, Gruenwalder Weg 28g Fon: +49 89 / 61308-351, Fax: -399, Mobile +49 170 4527211 http://www.sisis.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:12:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C218216A420 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:12:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3129043D55 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FBF730DE; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:20:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59621-03; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:20:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77411730AA; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:20:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <43B3F341.5030906@mac.com> References: <43B3F341.5030906@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:12:02 -0500 To: Chuck Swiger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: your advice on vinum, RAIDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:12:03 -0000 Some great advice here! What RAID level would you recommend for simply maximizing the hard disk space I have available? This is just my personal backup machine and will consist of two drives, so I don't need kick ass performance, and I don't need my files mirrored. I take it that striping is what I need to look at? RAID-0? Can I setup striping without reformatting, or only mirroring? Sorry, still learning the basics here.... On Dec 29, 2005, at 9:31 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Joe Auty wrote: >> I've been considering buying another hard drive for my FreeBSD >> machine, and building a RAID with my current hard drive so that >> both drives are treated as one. > > This is known as RAID-1 mirroring. > >> Do any of you have experience in this area? Is this advisable? > > Yes and yes. :-) > >> I'm assuming I'd be looking at creating a RAID-5? > > Not with only two drives. > RAID-5 needs at least 3, and is wasteful unless you have 4-5. > >> Can this be done without reformatting my current drive? > > You can set up mirroring without reformatting, but be sure you have > good backups of your data regardless. > >> Does this setup work well? Do you have any general advice for me? >> I need to >> know if there is risk involved here. > > When choosing RAID levels, you are making a tradeoff between > performance, reliability, and cost: > > If you prefer... ...consider using: > ----------------------------------------------- > performance, reliability: RAID-1 mirroring > performance, cost: RAID-0 striping > reliability, performance: RAID-1 mirroring (+ hot spare, if > possible) > reliability, cost: RAID-5 (+ hot spare) > cost, reliability: RAID-5 > cost, performance: RAID-0 striping > > If you've got enough drives, using RAID-10 or RAID-50 will also > improve performance compared to stock RAID-1 or RAID-5 modes. > > -- > -Chuck > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:15:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D844816A420 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledome.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A96443D46 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledome.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBTFFCkA012863; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:15:12 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:11:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200512281459.jBSExEAm033777@pershing.be> In-Reply-To: <200512281459.jBSExEAm033777@pershing.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512291711.29870.nvass@teledome.gr> Cc: Mile Subject: Re: mpd problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:22 -0000 On Wednesday 28 December 2005 16:59, Mile wrote: > Hi, > > I have a FreeBSD computer acting as gateway to windows clients.... > Some sites like msn.com, opera.com, hp.com, najdi.si .... dont work on > LAN... because of MTU problem. > > If i set MTU to 1492 instead of default 1500 then this sites work! (on > windows) > > (If i use userland pppoe then everything works without setting MTU on LAN. > (itself has an option mssfixup).) > > I tried with adding "set iface enable tcpmssfix" to mpd.conf as described > in mpd documentation, but it still doesnt work... msn.com and opera.com > work now... but others dont. There is a netgraph node that changes MSS in FreeBSD-6 and it works fine. Read ng_tcpmss(4). If you are using FreeBSD-5, google it. HTH, Nikos > > mpd.conf (Version 3.18) > default: > load PPPoE > > PPPoE: > new -i ng0 PPPoE PPPoE > set iface addrs 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 > set iface route default > set iface disable on-demand > set iface idle 0 > set bundle disable multilink > set bundle authname xxx > set link no acfcomp protocomp > set link disable pap chap > set link accept chap > set link mtu 1492 > set link keep-alive 10 60 > set ipcp yes vjcomp > set ipcp ranges 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > set iface enable tcpmssfix > open iface > > > natd.conf > interface ng0 > dynamic yes > use_sockets yes > > > ipfw > #natd > /sbin/ipfw 15 add divert natd all from any to any via ng0 > > > sysctl.conf > security.bsd.see_other_uids=0 > security.bsd.see_other_gids=0 > security.bsd.unprivileged_read_msgbuf=0 > net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 > net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 > vm.swap_idle_enabled=1 > kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=2097152 > kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048 > kern.maxfiles=65536 > kern.maxfilesperproc=32768 > net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0 > net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 > net.inet.tcp.sendspace=32768 > net.inet.tcp.recvspace=32768 > net.inet.udp.recvspace=32768 > net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344 > net.local.stream.recvspace=32768 > net.local.stream.sendspace=32768 > net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 > net.inet.icmp.log_redirect=1 > net.inet.ip.redirect=1 > net.inet6.ip6.redirect=0 > net.inet.ip.sourceroute=1 > net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute=1 > net.link.ether.inet.max_age=1200 > net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho=0 > #net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=1 > net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1 > > If you need any more info please contact me. > > > thanks, > Brane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:15:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D813C16A420 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3957E43D45 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 30758 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 15:15:25 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Dec 2005 15:15:25 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B2C0828423; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:15:24 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Gerard Seibert References: <20051228081309.I95953@seibercom.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 29 Dec 2005 10:15:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051228081309.I95953@seibercom.net> Message-ID: <44u0csq6ib.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 93 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Unable to install Webmin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:27 -0000 Gerard Seibert writes: > I have tried several time to install Webmin, but without > success. Actually, the program does install, it just cannot be run. > > After installing the program, I attempted to run the setup.sh > script. This is the output from that script. > > Script started on Wed Dec 28 08:08:38 2005 > *********************************************************************** > * Welcome to the Webmin setup script, version 1.250 * > *********************************************************************** > Webmin is a web-based interface that allows Unix-like operating > systems and common Unix services to be easily administered. > > Installing Webmin in /usr/local/lib/webmin ... > > *********************************************************************** > Webmin uses separate directories for configuration files and log files. > Unless you want to run multiple versions of Webmin at the same time > you can just accept the defaults. > > Config file directory [/usr/local/etc/webmin]: Log file directory > [/var/log/webmin]: > > *********************************************************************** > Webmin is written entirely in Perl. Please enter the full path to the > Perl 5 interpreter on your system. > > Full path to perl (default /usr/bin/perl): > > Testing Perl ... > Perl seems to be installed ok > > *********************************************************************** > Operating system name: FreeBSD > Operating system version: 5.4 > > *********************************************************************** > Webmin uses its own password protected web server to provide access > to the administration programs. The setup script needs to know : > - What port to run the web server on. There must not be another > web server already using this port. > - The login name required to access the web server. > - The password required to access the web server. > - If the webserver should use SSL (if your system supports it). > - Whether to start webmin at boot time. > > Web server port (default 10000): Login name (default admin): XXX > Login password: XXXXXXXX Password again: XXXXXXXX Use SSL (y/n): y > *********************************************************************** > Creating web server config files.. > ..done > > Creating access control file.. > ..done > > Creating start and stop scripts.. > ..done > > Copying config files.. > ..done > > Creating uninstall script /usr/local/etc/webmin/uninstall.sh .. > ..done > > Changing ownership and permissions .. > ..done > > Running postinstall scripts .. > ..done > > Attempting to start Webmin mini web server.. > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > ERROR: Failed to start web server! > > > Script done on Wed Dec 28 08:09:53 2005 > > > I have attempted to remove all traces of Webmin and reinstall, but > still it fails. I even removed and reinstalled Perl, but that made no > difference either. > > I checked, and there are no optimizatons in my /etc/make.conf file, so > that should not be the cause of the problem. > > What else should I look into to correct this problem? Hmm. I can't reproduce the problem. Did you install from the port? If so, did you set the rc.conf variable as instructed by the port? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:15:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE0316A42D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DCB043D5F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: (qmail 32579 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 15:15:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 15:15:49 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 217.196.247.135 Message-ID: <43B3FDA6.6080901@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:50 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43B3EE9B.8000105@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <43B3EE9B.8000105@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: inetd[469] messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:15:51 -0000 Robin Becker wrote: > Hi, I've recently installed/upgraded to freebsd 6.0 from freebsd 4.9. > Most things have gone very smoothly and I thank the developers. > > However, I'm seeing a lot of these messages in the system log > > Dec 29 02:41:46 www inetd[469]: ssh/tcp: bind: Address already in use > > It seems like these are every 10 minutes. I suppose it's something > obvious, but I don't know what. > > Can anyone help? My googling has improved: I see this from Kevin Kinsey > sshd(8) is enabled by adding: > > sshd_enable="YES" > > to /etc/rc.conf. It is started at bootup > and it seems likely that running it from inetd > as well would cause an error message such as > the one(s) you are describing. I blindly added ssh and ftp to the inetd.conf file at install time. Do I need to remove one or both? Is there a place where one can see which (if any daemons need to be started in the old way). It seems to me that if the standard sshd startup has changed then a simple comment in inetd.conf would help to avoid problems for people like me. -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:17:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28F216A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:17:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013DA43D8D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:17:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188AB5D78; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:17:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56076-10; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:17:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3255D3D; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:17:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B3FE02.7080908@mac.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:17:22 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Auty References: <43B3F341.5030906@mac.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: your advice on vinum, RAIDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:17:58 -0000 Joe Auty wrote: > Some great advice here! > > What RAID level would you recommend for simply maximizing the hard disk > space I have available? RAID-0 striping. Note that it gives you no redundancy or protection. > This is just my personal backup machine and > will consist of two drives, so I don't need kick ass performance, and I > don't need my files mirrored. I take it that striping is what I need to > look at? RAID-0? Can I setup striping without reformatting, or only > mirroring? If you plan to use RAID most effectively, plan to reformat. Do not attempt to setup RAID without having backups. However, you can glue two disks together without reformatting using something called "concatenation", but it doesn't perform as well as reformatting using striping. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:18:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0CF16A422 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:18:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5429143D79 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:18:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: (qmail 33022 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 15:18:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 15:18:03 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 217.196.247.135 Message-ID: <43B3FE2C.4020502@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:18:04 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43B3F12B.7010307@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <43B3F12B.7010307@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: sudo TTY Unknown messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:18:28 -0000 Robin Becker wrote: > I am getting messages from sudo concerning an unknown TTY. > > eg > > Dec 29 02:30:40 www sudo: root : TTY=unknown ; > PWD=/usr/tmp/BU/svn_backups ; USER=www ; COMMAND=/usr/local/bin/svnadmin > dump -q -r0:19591 /svn/private > > I think this is caused by not having a tty device in the root cron job. > I would prefer to keep only one main cron job for my system or is that > frowned upon. I'm being daft; it seems sudo always logs itself. Is there away to get sudo to not syslog if it's root sudoing as www? I looked at sudoers, but couldn't see an obvious way to set !syslog for root > www using svnadmin or svnlook etc etc -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:25:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044F516A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:25:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rseals@vdsi.net) Received: from broad.100mwh.com (broad.100mwh.com [205.214.86.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6007A43D7B for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:25:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rseals@vdsi.net) Received: from static-70-22-125-177.balt.east.verizon.net ([70.22.125.177] helo=stlmofaxtest.mbh.mhs.magellanhs.com) by broad.100mwh.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ErzeF-0001px-CE; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:24:37 -0600 From: Ray Seals To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20051229150940.GI39217@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1135797945.645.8.camel@localhost> <20051228204256.GG39217@dan.emsphone.com> <1135865692.633.4.camel@localhost> <20051229150940.GI39217@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Virtual Data Systems, Inc. Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:25:14 -0600 Message-Id: <1135869914.633.13.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - broad.100mwh.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vdsi.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Is there a Freebsd equivalent to this Linux header file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rseals@vdsi.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:25:03 -0000 On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 09:09 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Dec 29), Ray Seals said: > So plug it in and run tcpdump :) > Well, that's what I did. When you connect the 2 ports they never show a connection but they pass traffic. This is because by default they are in Mode 0. Oh, I forgot to mention the "modes": Mode 0: Niagara 2261 in this mode, powers up with Ethernet port 1 and Ethernet port 2 connected together and the Intel Giga bit controller off line. In order to set the two ports to send and receive data traffic from Intel Giga bit MAC and function as a dual giga bit NIC card, the on board local CPU expects to receive a heartbeat signal from the host at a pre-programmed interval. In the event that the local CPU does not receive the heartbeat it removed the Intel Giga bit MAC from the data path and connects the two Ethernet ports. For detail on local on board CPU please refer section 2.4 Mode 1: Niagara 2261 in mode 1, powers up with Ethernet port 1 and Ethernet port 2 not connected together but operate independently similar to dual giga bit cards. In order to bypass the Intel Giga bit controller and short the two ports together, the local CPU expects to receive a heartbeat from the host. For detail on local on board CPU please refer section 2.4 Mode 2: Niagara 2261 in mode 2 functions similar to dual giga bit NIC cards. Each port is independent of the other one. No heartbeat is required. So it looks like the key here is to setup a heartbeat function so they can go "active". I also thought about setting the card to mode 2 just to play around with tcpdump on 2 different segments, but I could do that with 2 gig nics I have laying on my desk. I've contacted the manufacturer and actually have a contact person to talk to there (via e-mail). I'm going to ask if they are opposed to open source development or anything like that. There source for the utility programs doesn't have any copy right info, etc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:47:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E1816A425 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:47:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F16A43D7E for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:46:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper [212.12.50.230]) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBTFkXRs000681; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:46:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9/Submit) id jBTFkXrH000680; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:46:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cracauer) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:46:33 -0500 From: Martin Cracauer To: Joe Auty Message-ID: <20051229104633.A581@cons.org> References: <43B3F341.5030906@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from joe@netmusician.org on Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 10:12:02AM -0500 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: your advice on vinum, RAIDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:47:07 -0000 Joe Auty wrote on Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 10:12:02AM -0500: > Some great advice here! > > What RAID level would you recommend for simply maximizing the hard > disk space I have available? This is just my personal backup machine > and will consist of two drives, so I don't need kick ass performance, > and I don't need my files mirrored. I take it that striping is what I > need to look at? RAID-0? Can I setup striping without reformatting, > or only mirroring? Why do you want to RAID in first place then? RAID-0 is the only option that doesn't lose space, but it increases your risk for the benefit of performance. Since you don't need performance there is no point in taking the risk, much less the bootstrapping hassle. You cannot convert existing filesystems to raid without first moving the data somewhere. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:48:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC87816A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:48:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D4B43D5C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:48:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper [212.12.50.230]) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBTFmHYT000705; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:48:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9/Submit) id jBTFmGCn000704; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:48:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cracauer) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:48:16 -0500 From: Martin Cracauer To: Kiffin Gish Message-ID: <20051229104816.B581@cons.org> References: <1135855260.1034.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1135855260.1034.5.camel@localhost>; from kiffin.gish@planet.nl on Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 12:21:00PM +0100 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:48:19 -0000 Kiffin Gish wrote on Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 12:21:00PM +0100: > I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 6.0 and noticed the introduction of > option SCHED_ULE for supporting multi-processor environments. > > However, I understood that using SCHED_ULE with only one CPU can also > improve performance significantly. > > Is this true, and if so, what are the risks involved dropping good old > SCHED_4BSD for the new-and-improved scheduler? I have not even noticed an increase in performance from ULE when running my benchmark suite on a two-processor system. Some people say ULE has problems, but mostly on high CPU counts. So it probably doesn't matter either way. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:52:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C9B16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:52:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com (hosting-28.42.rev.fr.colt.net [213.41.42.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC94643D4C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:52:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F2C37609D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:52:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (freefugu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82999-01 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:52:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.bsdmon.com (14.128.101-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.101.128.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96B337606C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:51:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by sdf1.bsdmon.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6AB13B853; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:51:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:51:56 +0100 From: Gilbert Cao To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051229155156.GB1075@bsdmon.com> References: <20051228112558.GA79302@bsdmon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051228112558.GA79302@bsdmon.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE i386 Organization: BSDMon X-GPG-Key: http://www.bsdmon.com/public_key.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdmon.com Subject: Re: Preserve date when cp over smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:52:11 -0000 --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 12:25:58PM +0100, Gilbert Cao wrote: >=20 > I have quickly looked into the source code of both cp and gqview, and it = seems > that cp relies on utimes(), and gqview relies on utime(). >=20 Hi, I have finally done my little investigation when applying utime() or utimes= () to a SMB file path : In both case, the access and modification times are preserved. So it seems that the cp and tar utilities does not its job about preserving times over SMB path (I still don't know why ...). I have a source code example available, if anyone is interested. --=20 -------------------------------- (hika) Gilbert Cao http://www.miaouirc.com - MiaouIRC Project 2002-2003 http://www.bsdmon.com - The BSD DMON Power to serve IRC : #miaule at IRCNET Network -------------------------------- --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDtAYbSyQfFTqAEpcRAkHwAJ9UlR6fLii8UuhOq/A4aanAavKPOQCfcJve 7puu7GUKRWPRgmPM5zZtvhg= =nGzy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:54:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1698316A431 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:54:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AC6243D58 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:54:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2005 15:54:47 -0000 Received: from pD952E61D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO p4-3200) [217.82.230.29] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 16:54:47 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4870692 To: guru@sisis.de References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:54:42 +0100 From: "Andreas Rudisch" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.51 (Win32, build 7712) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:54:50 -0000 On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:10:00 +0100, wrote: > El día Thursday, December 29, 2005 a las 04:58:14PM +0200, Giorgos > Keramidas escribió: > >> The distfiles are the sources of the ported programs. > > I know. > >> They are >> not specific to a single release. You can just copy over the >> distfiles from the older notebook and rebuild your ports. > > That's not true. I copied over the /usr/ports/distfiles from my > 5.4-REL to the 6.0-REL but the ports-collection which comes with > 6.0-REL will use other sources while doing 'make install' in > /usr/ports/x11/kde: Well, since 6.0 came out much after 5.4, it uses updated ports/ packages (new features, bugfixes), so the versions of some ports of 6.0 will be higher than of 5.4. What is the point in installing a new release of FreeBSD and using 'old' ports. Just install FreeBSD 6.0 and use the packages provided with the RELEASE, or cvsup your ports tree and do a fresh install of the ports you need. Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 15:59:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C320B16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:59:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (imap.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1AA43D5C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:59:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBTFx09T004594; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:59:00 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43B407BD.2070603@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:58:53 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051221) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robin Becker References: <43B3F12B.7010307@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> <43B3FE2C.4020502@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <43B3FE2C.4020502@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig58B1961704ED22B370E96E0F" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:59:00 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sudo TTY Unknown messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:59:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig58B1961704ED22B370E96E0F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robin Becker wrote: > I'm being daft; it seems sudo always logs itself. Is there away to get > sudo to not syslog if it's root sudoing as www? I looked at sudoers, but > couldn't see an obvious way to set !syslog for > > root > www using svnadmin or svnlook etc etc Well, if you're starting as root, you can just use: su user -c 'some command line' to run a command as whatever user you want -- no password required. su will log to /var/log/auth.log but it's nowhere near as verbose as sudo. Or you can use /etc/crontab which has an extra field specifying which UID a command should be run as, unlike the normal per-user crontab files. Usual advice is to leave /etc/crontab alone and put your local cron jobs into the per-user crontab files. However the system crontab file /can/ be customised if you really want to -- you'll just have to merge any changes when you do system updates and so forth. But on the whole, the best and cleanest solution to running cron jobs as some arbitrary user is to create a crontab file for that user. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig58B1961704ED22B370E96E0F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDtAfD8Mjk52CukIwRA8hjAJwOQN44ytjZfPcVdSq2NFVdQe7QuACgiagc EgYav14O+C1HYfZZ0GiOdYs= =YMtK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig58B1961704ED22B370E96E0F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 16:10:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B9916A422 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:10:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0807243D8C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:10:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA13649; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:08:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma013637; Thu, 29 Dec 05 17:08:15 +0100 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (rebelion.Sisis.de [193.31.10.34]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA22280; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:10:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBTGAPnx013745; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:10:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:10:25 +0100 To: Andreas Rudisch Message-ID: <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (i386) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:10:43 -0000 El día Thursday, December 29, 2005 a las 04:54:42PM +0100, Andreas Rudisch escribió: > On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:10:00 +0100, wrote: > > >El día Thursday, December 29, 2005 a las 04:58:14PM +0200, Giorgos > >Keramidas escribió: > > > >>The distfiles are the sources of the ported programs. > > > >I know. > > > >>They are > >>not specific to a single release. You can just copy over the > >>distfiles from the older notebook and rebuild your ports. > > > >That's not true. I copied over the /usr/ports/distfiles from my > >5.4-REL to the 6.0-REL but the ports-collection which comes with > >6.0-REL will use other sources while doing 'make install' in > >/usr/ports/x11/kde: > > Well, since 6.0 came out much after 5.4, it uses updated ports/ > packages (new features, bugfixes), so the versions of some ports > of 6.0 will be higher than of 5.4. Yes, that's the reason and that was what I discovered a few seconds after fireing up 'make install' in /usr/ports/x11/kde; to give one example: it is building KDE 3.4.2 and not 3.4.0 which was used by 5.4-REL; > What is the point in installing a > new release of FreeBSD and using 'old' ports. > > Just install FreeBSD 6.0 and use the packages provided with the RELEASE, > or cvsup your ports tree and do a fresh install of the ports you need. My point was that I don't have a fast Internet link at home to fetch all the (new) sources for the distfiles and I was looking for distfiles on CD which match exactly the 6.0-REL ports collection requirements; matthias -- Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH ein Tochterunternehmen der OCLC PICA B.V. Leiden (NL) D-82041 Oberhaching, Gruenwalder Weg 28g Fon: +49 89 / 61308-351, Fax: -399, Mobile +49 170 4527211 http://www.sisis.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 16:16:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBFB16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:16:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from syjef@mdanderson.org) Received: from mail.mdanderson.org (mail.mdanderson.org [143.111.251.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE43D43DC1 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:16:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from syjef@mdanderson.org) Received: by jef-nt.mdacc.tmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 431E3BC63; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:15:48 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Fosburgh Organization: UT MD Anderson Cancer Center To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:15:42 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <636A75F5E9CA8741A3136582949F95876E9E25@postur.ecweb.local> In-Reply-To: <636A75F5E9CA8741A3136582949F95876E9E25@postur.ecweb.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1249863.H3qW2XboVe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512291015.44416.syjef@mdanderson.org> Cc: "Gestur A. Grjetarsson" Subject: Re: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:16:33 -0000 --nextPart1249863.H3qW2XboVe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 28 December 2005 07:32, Gestur A. Grjetarsson wrote: > Hi > > I have IBM Blade with Qlogic 2312 adapters using DS400 SAN > > now I have learned that after over 10 years of good FreeBSD experience on > various sorts of hardware, I can't use FreeBSD anymore as it does'nt work > on IBM Blade. I have read alot on this problem trying to solve this probl= em > and done alot of testing and hacking but without any progress. > > so I have two questions: > > is FreeBSD going to support IBM Blade? > > if it is going to support and work on IBM Blade, can you give me an > estimation on when it will be ready to run on IBM Blade? The blade center is a bizarre beast and it is difficult to make the officia= lly=20 supported Operating Systems work correctly with it. We had difficulties=20 making AIX work properly on the JS20 blade, for instance. With IBM hardwar= e,=20 it is best to stick with officially supported products. Sometimes, IBM=20 doesn't support something for a reason... I would be (pleasantly) surprised to laern you were able to attach FreeBSD = to=20 IBM storage. Of course, IBM will provide you with no help in either of=20 these, and I wouldn't venture to guess if you can do concurrent maintenance= =20 on your DS4000 with FreeBSD running. =2D-=20 Jonathan Fosburgh AIX and Storage Administrator UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX=20 --nextPart1249863.H3qW2XboVe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDtAuwqUvQmqp7omYRAvLlAKCUxe4h0FGHTVN4MWxf8324amokVQCfb+A4 CqA2o7IkEC93B8O6JXY+eOg= =aSE+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1249863.H3qW2XboVe-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 16:21:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089CC16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:21:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from syjef@mdanderson.org) Received: from mail.mdanderson.org (mail.mdanderson.org [143.111.251.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F0B43D58 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:21:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from syjef@mdanderson.org) Received: by jef-nt.mdacc.tmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4699EBC89; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:06:32 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Fosburgh Organization: UT MD Anderson Cancer Center To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:06:16 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <01a001c6086d$8c0d57e0$210110ac@fortunato> <43AD197A.50905@gmx.net> <01bd01c60872$faef7990$210110ac@fortunato> In-Reply-To: <01bd01c60872$faef7990$210110ac@fortunato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1161888.G43piizVSd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512291006.18187.syjef@mdanderson.org> Cc: Teilhard Knight Subject: Re: USB mice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:21:59 -0000 --nextPart1161888.G43piizVSd Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary-01=_5lAtDjp8PbOeDA5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --Boundary-01=_5lAtDjp8PbOeDA5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 24 December 2005 04:15, Teilhard Knight wrote: > > It didn't work. Actually I have a little more than a USB mouse, I have a > wireless mouse and wireless keyboard which are both controlled by a centr= al > unit which plugs into an USB port in the computer. The keyboard works wel= l, > with the option of booting with an USB keyboard, but I cannot make the > mouse work. Any suggestions? > Try one of the attached patches. They are taken from usb/77604. The patch= is=20 now known to work with at least three different manufacturers mice, and so= =20 far as I have been able to tell doesn't break anything that works without i= t. =20 Maybe someone will eventually commit these patches to the appropriate trees= ,=20 the PR has only been open for about 10 months... Choose one of the patches based on the release of FreeBSD you are using. t= he=20 hid.c.patch file is for RELENG_5, hid.c.patch.6 is for RELENG_6 and HEAD.=20 Deposit the file in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb and run patch X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFED16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:22:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A0B43D49 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:22:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 7543 invoked by uid 510); 29 Dec 2005 16:24:31 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 2.431862 secs); 29 Dec 2005 16:24:31 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 2.431862 secs Process 7536) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 16:24:28 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: Joe Auty In-Reply-To: <336CE4EB-C1F3-4C6E-8057-1F068BFEE3BA@netmusician.org> References: <1135847660.2006.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <336CE4EB-C1F3-4C6E-8057-1F068BFEE3BA@netmusician.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1135873468.5677.8.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:24:28 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: your advice on vinum, RAIDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:22:04 -0000 On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 15:05, Joe Auty wrote: > On Dec 29, 2005, at 4:14 AM, Robert Slade wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 06:09, Joe Auty wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I've been considering buying another hard drive for my FreeBSD > >> machine, and building a RAID with my current hard drive so that both > >> drives are treated as one. > >> > >> Do any of you have experience in this area? Is this advisable? I'm > >> assuming I'd be looking at creating a RAID-5? Can this be done > >> without reformatting my current drive? Does this setup work well? Do > >> you have any general advice for me? I need to know if there is risk > >> involved here. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks in advance! > > > > Joe, > > > > It depends on what you need to do. If you just want data integrity > > then > > you need raid 1 - mirroring and GEOM is your friend. There is a good > > section in the Handbook on setting a GEOM raid 1 without formatting > > the > > original drive. > > > > > > If you are also looking for more drive space, then raid 5 gives a > > measure of both. > > > > In both cases, the warning of backing up the system first applies. > > > > > Hmmm..... What I need is more drive space. Should I look at GEOM > rather than vinum? Do you know whether the drives would need to be > reformatted in order to setup the RAID? > > I'll definitely heed your advice on backing up the drive first! Joe, I if you are not worried about integrity, I would leave Raid alone. To add more space, just the drive and mount it. I have just added more space on a machine by mounting a new drive as /data and copying the home dirs across then relinking the /home dir to home. Have a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-adding.html Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 16:50:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A6F16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:50:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gary@hayers.org) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7346243D53 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:50:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gary@hayers.org) Received: from thor.hayers.net ([82.34.131.150]) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:50:56 +0000 Received: from [192.168.8.2] (bart.hayers.net [192.168.8.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by thor.hayers.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBTGnskT011579; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:49:55 GMT (envelope-from gary@hayers.org) Message-ID: <43B413CD.9040907@hayers.org> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:50:21 +0000 From: Gary Hayers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20051228081309.I95953@seibercom.net> <44u0csq6ib.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44u0csq6ib.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter with Sophos (http://www.amavis.org) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2005 16:50:56.0638 (UTC) FILETIME=[09D871E0:01C60C98] Cc: Subject: Re: Unable to install Webmin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:50:01 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Gerard Seibert writes: >>Attempting to start Webmin mini web server.. >>Segmentation fault (core dumped) >>ERROR: Failed to start web server! >> >> >>Script done on Wed Dec 28 08:09:53 2005 >> >> >>I have attempted to remove all traces of Webmin and reinstall, but >>still it fails. I even removed and reinstalled Perl, but that made no >>difference either. >> >>I checked, and there are no optimizatons in my /etc/make.conf file, so >>that should not be the cause of the problem. >> >>What else should I look into to correct this problem? > > > Hmm. I can't reproduce the problem. > > Did you install from the port? > If so, did you set the rc.conf variable as instructed by the port? I also have this problem, do I need the suid perl or will the default perl install be ok? Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 16:50:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1B416A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clear@alum.mit.edu) Received: from newmx1.fast.net (newmx1.fast.net [209.92.1.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A6A843D53 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:50:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clear@alum.mit.edu) Received: (qmail 24307 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 16:50:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alum.mit.edu) ([207.8.186.46]) (envelope-sender ) by newmx1.fast.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Dec 2005 16:50:04 -0000 Message-ID: <43B413BB.1C80C93D@alum.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:50:03 -0500 From: Jed Clear Organization: Dis X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ex/vi: Error: Log file: No such file or directory (solved) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:50:06 -0000 For the record[1]: After a non OS drive hardware[2] failure I started getting the following when trying to vi a file as a non root user: ex/vi: Error: Log file: No such file or directory I spent time chasing a few other things since chunks of /var and /etc were also missing[3]. However, I was ultimately forced to use the source, Luke. What I found was that my non root account had $TMPDIR set to a directory that was on the defunct disk. -Jed [1] So Google will show up something less useless in the future. [2] The second Maxtor Atlas 10K IV to fail on me. [3] Possibly related to the SCSI controller aborting. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 16:55:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A7216A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:55:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C124643D9C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:55:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IS9006J2R80WY10@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:00:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:55:11 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:55:11 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: Subject: Going from bind9 to djbdns X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:55:30 -0000 Hello! My friend, who hosts most of my stuff, is using djbdns. Probably for security and simplicity. Anyway I thought I'd do the same. But I'm having serious difficulties finding a user-friendly howto. I've basically picked stuff from here and there and put them together. Would this be what I need to set up a djbdns equivalent to http://www.home.no/hedhnta/namedb? -- Create users: tinydns axfrdns dnslog dnscache -- Run these commands: mkdir /etc/tinydns mkdir /etc/axfrdns mkdir /etc/dnslog mkdir /etc/dnscache mkdir /etc/dnscache/root mkdir /etc/dnscache/root/ip mkdir /etc/dnscache/root/servers Should the above directories be set as home for the users above? -- Continue with: dnscache-conf dnscache dnslog /etc/dnscache 127.0.0.1 touch /etc/dnscache/root/ip/192.168.187.1 touch /etc/dnscache/root/ip/192.168.187.2 echo 127.0.0.1 > /etc/dnscache/root/servers/mydomain.lan echo 127.0.0.1 > /etc/dnscache/root/servers/187.168.192.in-addr.arpa tinydns-conf tinydns dnslog /etc/tinydns 213.187.181.70 axfrdns-conf axfrdns dnslog /etc/axfrdns /etc/tinydns 213.187.181.70 ln -s /etc/dnscache /service ln -s /etc/tinydns /service svc -t /service/dnscache -- Would djbdns now have created this file for me? If so, can I skip this? If not, I take it I should: vim /etc/tinydns/data And type in: .mydomain.com::ns1.mydomain.com @mydomain.com::mail.mydomain.com =myhost.mydomain.com:213.181.112.43 +mail.mydomain.com:213.181.112.43 +www.mydomain.com:213.181.112.43 Then: cd /etc/tinydns make -- To allow my 213.181.102.23 to be ns2.mydomain.com, I must do this? vi /etc/axfrdns/tcp And then type in: 213.181.102.23:allow,AXFR="*" I have a lot of domains. I want the ns2 to handle them all. Is the wildcard "*" valid, or should I list them all? Anyway: cd /etc/axfrdns make -- As for my zone files, I take it I could cram all my domains into the data file? How would that look? -- That's it. I'm hoping that once everything is up, my configuration will be stored in files that I can back up and easily redeploy incase of an accident (similar to my current namedb setup I posted above). Thank you all, and happy new year! Kristian Vaaf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 17:00:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A08C16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:00:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 747DE43D68 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:00:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2005 17:00:26 -0000 Received: from pD952E61D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO p4-3200) [217.82.230.29] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 18:00:26 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4870692 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:00:27 +0100 From: "Andreas Rudisch" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.51 (Win32, build 7712) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:00:49 -0000 On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:10:25 +0100, wrote: > My point was that I don't have a fast Internet link at home to fetch all > the (new) sources for the distfiles and I was looking for distfiles on > CD which match exactly the 6.0-REL ports collection requirements; In that case use the packages from the install CDs and do _not_ use ports. Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 17:13:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E7F16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:13:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E42043D6A for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:13:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBTHDoG1023205; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:13:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43B4194E.9020203@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:13:50 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: guru@Sisis.de References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:13:53 -0000 guru@Sisis.de wrote: > El día Thursday, December 29, 2005 a las 04:54:42PM +0100, Andreas Rudisch escribió: > > >>On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:10:00 +0100, wrote: [snip] >>Just install FreeBSD 6.0 and use the packages provided with the RELEASE, >>or cvsup your ports tree and do a fresh install of the ports you need. > > > My point was that I don't have a fast Internet link at home to fetch all > the (new) sources for the distfiles and I was looking for distfiles on > CD which match exactly the 6.0-REL ports collection requirements; If you don't have a fast connection you might want to consider installing the ports from packages (which *are* on the release ISO images, at least for popular ports) rather than compiling all your ports from source. Anyway, do you think you could download an ISO of the sources all that much faster than just downloading the sources directly from their respective repositories around the world as is normally done? OK, maybe a little bit faster, but not that much. If you simply must have sources not packages, you might consider using something like portupgrade -F to prefetch the sources you want separately from doing compilation, and just batch it to do that fetching overnight or something. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 17:19:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCBE16A423 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:19:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2ED43D78 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:18:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C45FD2E030 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:18:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:18:21 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: AycKgyl7PnGVCqiagvjkjbDNqQ0LhxqJlIAkNpdXUlqE 1135876700 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-201-248.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.201.248]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D7057146D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:18:20 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:18:16 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1135754041.21128.18.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1135754041.21128.18.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512291718.18306.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: New IDE drive in old PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:19:10 -0000 On Wednesday 28 December 2005 07:14, Robert Slade wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:12, Robert Ames wrote: > > I have an old (very old) ASUS P5 motherboard running FreeBSD 5.4. > > The boot disk is a 40MB Western Digital WD400 IDE drive jumpered to > > only use 32MB so it can be booted from since the BIOS in this PC > > (the latest and greatest) can't deal with anything larger than 32MB. > > This PC is working well for me and I don't want to upgrade it. > > However I would like to add a lot of disk space. So my question > > is, can I go out and buy a new 300 GB (or whatever) IDE disk and > > attach it to the secondary IDE controller and hope to use all 300 > > GB? I will still use the old disk for booting and to hold the OS. > > The new disk will be just for data. If this will "just work" how do > > I configure the BIOS so the PC will boot with the large drive installed? > > Robert, > > If you had to jumper the boot disk for it to work with the BIOS of the > motherboard, then the chances are that you would have to do the same > with the 2nd hard drive. > > ISTR that ASUS produced updated BIOS' for most of their motherboards to > get around this. Have a look at their website to see if there is and > upgrade. There is also a area on the site for questions such as yours. I would have thought the main issue is support for 48-bit LBA. The limit for 32-bit LBA is 137GB (128 GiB). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 17:24:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB0516A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:24:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james_mapson@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.museum.rain.com (gw-ipinc.museum.rain.com [65.75.192.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115FA43D5A for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:24:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james_mapson@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.museum.rain.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.museum.rain.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBTHOXv8063372 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:24:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@umpquanet.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.museum.rain.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBTHOXcF063371; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:24:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:24:33 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051229172433.GA63331@ns.museum.rain.com> References: <20051229162943.960D216A429@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051229162943.960D216A429@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on ns.museum.rain.com Cc: Robin Becker Subject: Re: inetd[469] messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:24:42 -0000 > Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:11:39 +0000 > From: Robin Becker > Subject: inetd[469] messages > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <43B3EE9B.8000105@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi, I've recently installed/upgraded to freebsd 6.0 from freebsd 4.9. Most > things have gone very smoothly and I thank the developers. > > However, I'm seeing a lot of these messages in the system log > > Dec 29 02:41:46 www inetd[469]: ssh/tcp: bind: Address already in use > > It seems like these are every 10 minutes. I suppose it's something obvious, but > I don't know what. > > Can anyone help? > -- > Robin Becker It's not "anything obvious" if you don't post any info. Since inetd is the one making the complaining log entries, why not post inetd.conf? Just a guess, but I'd venture that you're running ssh as a daemon AND from inetd.conf. If so, remove the entry from inetd.conf. But without seeing your inetd configuration, that's pure speculation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 17:57:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B6216A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:57:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBC943D5A for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:57:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.60] ([82.35.113.87]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:58:27 +0000 Message-ID: <43B4237F.4070606@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:57:19 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <1135754041.21128.18.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1135754041.21128.18.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2005 17:58:27.0163 (UTC) FILETIME=[782582B0:01C60CA1] Subject: Re: New IDE drive in old PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:57:35 -0000 > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:12, Robert Ames wrote: > >>I have an old (very old) ASUS P5 motherboard running FreeBSD 5.4. >>The boot disk is a 40MB Western Digital WD400 IDE drive jumpered to >>only use 32MB so it can be booted from since the BIOS in this PC >>(the latest and greatest) can't deal with anything larger than 32MB. >>This PC is working well for me and I don't want to upgrade it. >>However I would like to add a lot of disk space. So my question >>is, can I go out and buy a new 300 GB (or whatever) IDE disk and >>attach it to the secondary IDE controller and hope to use all 300 >>GB? I will still use the old disk for booting and to hold the OS. >>The new disk will be just for data. If this will "just work" how do >>I configure the BIOS so the PC will boot with the large drive installed? I presume you mean GB for size. I just plugged a 250GB drive into a PIII 500 Supermicro board. The bios thinks it is 8GB. I get No Rom Basic if I try to boot. I also tried it as an external USB drive and fdisk'd and bsdlabelled it as 250GB without problem using FBSD6. I think if I could have booted there would have been no problem with the disk on the IDE chain as FBSD sees disks directly not through the BIOS (or so I understand). I can test on a P5AB if you want but it will take a day or two. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 18:01:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D2316A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:01:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DE143D45 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:01:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FB65E36; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:01:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28452-01; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:01:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF42A5C43; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:01:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B42493.5090807@mac.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:01:55 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Whitehouse References: <1135754041.21128.18.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <43B4237F.4070606@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <43B4237F.4070606@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: New IDE drive in old PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:01:51 -0000 Chris Whitehouse wrote: >> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:12, Robert Ames wrote: [ ... ] >>> The new disk will be just for data. If this will "just work" how do >>> I configure the BIOS so the PC will boot with the large drive installed? > > I presume you mean GB for size. I just plugged a 250GB drive into a PIII > 500 Supermicro board. The bios thinks it is 8GB. I get No Rom Basic if I > try to boot. I also tried it as an external USB drive and fdisk'd and > bsdlabelled it as 250GB without problem using FBSD6. [ ... ] FreeBSD will use LBA addressing modes, even if your BIOS does not support it. However, to access a drive above 137GB, your hardware needs to support 48-bit LBA. However, you can get a PCI ATA controller to do the job which is cheap and convenient, or simply update your MB to something newer... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 18:04:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A564C16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:04:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (fed1rmmtao08.cox.net [68.230.241.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8378343D88 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:04:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from workdog ([68.228.71.3]) by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051229180234.KFJG26964.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@workdog> for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:02:34 -0500 From: "Gayn Winters" To: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:04:28 -0800 Organization: Bristol Systems Inc. Message-ID: <00f801c60ca2$4f7dfd50$6501a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 In-Reply-To: <200512291718.18306.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: RE: New IDE drive in old PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:04:38 -0000 > On Behalf Of RW > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:18 AM > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 07:14, Robert Slade wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:12, Robert Ames wrote: > > > I have an old (very old) ASUS P5 motherboard running FreeBSD 5.4. > > > The boot disk is a 40MB Western Digital WD400 IDE drive > jumpered to > > > only use 32MB so it can be booted from since the BIOS in this PC > > > (the latest and greatest) can't deal with anything larger > than 32MB. > > > This PC is working well for me and I don't want to upgrade it. > > > However I would like to add a lot of disk space. So my question > > > is, can I go out and buy a new 300 GB (or whatever) IDE disk and > > > attach it to the secondary IDE controller and hope to use all 300 > > > GB? I will still use the old disk for booting and to hold the OS. > > > The new disk will be just for data. If this will "just > work" how do > > > I configure the BIOS so the PC will boot with the large > drive installed? > > > > Robert, > > > > If you had to jumper the boot disk for it to work with the > BIOS of the motherboard, then the chances are that you would have to do the same > > with the 2nd hard drive. > > > > ISTR that ASUS produced updated BIOS' for most of their > motherboards to get around this. Have a look at their website to see if there is and > > upgrade. There is also a area on the site for questions > such as yours. > > I would have thought the main issue is support for 48-bit > LBA. The limit for 32-bit LBA is 137GB (128 GiB). Since the OP wants more disk space and somehow can't upgrade this old BIOS (the preferred option), separate the issue into two: 1. How to boot 2. How to access the large disk. I haven't tried it, but if you installed the large drive as a second disk, then you could boot off the older (jumpered even) hard drive. Even if the BIOS doesn't see the second hard drive, it probably won't go belly up. I would think FreeBSD would then see the second drive when it booted and handle it correctly (since FreeBSD doesn't use the BIOS for access.) Map the second drive as /data and enjoy. I recommend putting the old drive as primary (master) on the first IDE channel and putting the new drive as slave or as master on the second IDE channel. I don't think trying this risks data on your old drive, but back it up anyway! Good luck, -gayn Bristol Systems Inc. 714/532-6776 www.bristolsystems.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 18:14:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AAD16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:14:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (fed1rmmtao02.cox.net [68.230.241.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E8843D55 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:14:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from workdog ([68.228.71.3]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051229181223.BJRR17006.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@workdog> for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:12:23 -0500 From: "Gayn Winters" To: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:14:00 -0800 Organization: Bristol Systems Inc. Message-ID: <00fb01c60ca3$a7b7c900$6501a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 In-Reply-To: <00f801c60ca2$4f7dfd50$6501a8c0@workdog> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: RE: New IDE drive in old PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:14:02 -0000 > On Behalf Of Gayn Winters > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:04 AM > > On Behalf Of RW > > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:18 AM > > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 07:14, Robert Slade wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:12, Robert Ames wrote: > > > > I have an old (very old) ASUS P5 motherboard running > FreeBSD 5.4. > > > > The boot disk is a 40MB Western Digital WD400 IDE drive > > jumpered to > > > > only use 32MB so it can be booted from since the BIOS in this PC > > > > (the latest and greatest) can't deal with anything larger > > than 32MB. > > > > This PC is working well for me and I don't want to upgrade it. > > > > However I would like to add a lot of disk space. So my question > > > > is, can I go out and buy a new 300 GB (or whatever) IDE disk and > > > > attach it to the secondary IDE controller and hope to > use all 300 > > > > GB? I will still use the old disk for booting and to > hold the OS. > > > > The new disk will be just for data. If this will "just > > work" how do > > > > I configure the BIOS so the PC will boot with the large > > drive installed? > > > > > > Robert, > > > > > > If you had to jumper the boot disk for it to work with the > > BIOS of the motherboard, then the chances are that you would have to > do the same > > > with the 2nd hard drive. > > > > > > ISTR that ASUS produced updated BIOS' for most of their > > motherboards to get around this. Have a look at their website to see > if there is and > > > upgrade. There is also a area on the site for questions > > such as yours. > > > > I would have thought the main issue is support for 48-bit > > LBA. The limit for 32-bit LBA is 137GB (128 GiB). > > Since the OP wants more disk space and somehow can't upgrade this old > BIOS (the preferred option), separate the issue into two: > 1. How to boot > 2. How to access the large disk. > > I haven't tried it, but if you installed the large drive as a second > disk, then you could boot off the older (jumpered even) hard drive. > Even if the BIOS doesn't see the second hard drive, it > probably won't go > belly up. I would think FreeBSD would then see the second > drive when it > booted and handle it correctly (since FreeBSD doesn't use the BIOS for > access.) Map the second drive as /data and enjoy. > > I recommend putting the old drive as primary (master) on the first IDE > channel and putting the new drive as slave or as master on the second > IDE channel. > > I don't think trying this risks data on your old drive, but back it up > anyway! Chuck Swinger's caveat will apply to the above: FreeBSD will use LBA addressing modes, even if your BIOS does not support it. However, to access a drive above 137GB, your hardware needs to support 48-bit LBA. However, you can get a PCI ATA controller to do the job which is cheap and convenient, or simply update your MB to something newer... -- -Chuck -gayn Bristol Systems Inc. 714/532-6776 www.bristolsystems.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 18:14:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FDF16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C4343D45 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1360C96192 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:14:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61701-20 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:14:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7566995F7E for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:14:42 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:14:36 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2299577.rxi2rqGNI5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512291214.41005.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: Going from bind9 to djbdns X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:14:44 -0000 --nextPart2299577.rxi2rqGNI5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 29 December 2005 10:55, Kristian Vaaf wrote: > Hello! > > My friend, who hosts most of my stuff, is using djbdns. Probably for > security and simplicity. 1) BIND 9 is a whole different animal from BIND <=3D8, with many fewer=20 vulnerabilities. 2) In this case, "simplicity" means "staggering lack of functionality" - no= =20 IXFR, dynamic DNS, etc. > Anyway I thought I'd do the same. But I'm having serious difficulties > finding a user-friendly howto. DJB hates users. They do pesky things like find vulnerabilities in his cod= e=20 and make him work to find a reason to blame them on something else. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2299577.rxi2rqGNI5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDtCeQ5sRg+Y0CpvERAt48AJ9ukUACSyg7psX080hTztetBCAWfQCggSpY xOQQzSWEPIoeXIES57SVAFU= =6xyA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2299577.rxi2rqGNI5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 19:02:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C098C16A420; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:02:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tlp@liquidx.org) Received: from illusionist.sov.kewlio.net.uk (fxp-0.712-illusionist.sov.kewlio.net.uk [85.116.0.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2629343D4C; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:02:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tlp@liquidx.org) Received: from [192.168.0.18] (71-33-104-72.bois.qwest.net [71.33.104.72]) (authenticated bits=0 user=tlp) by illusionist.sov.kewlio.net.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBTJ2rPm050529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:02:56 GMT From: Travis Poppe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:02:51 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512291202.51955.tlp@liquidx.org> Cc: Subject: Harddrive size being reported incorrectly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:02:59 -0000 Hello, I've recently purchased an IDE 320GB Western Digital WD3200JB-22KFA0 harddrive for use in my FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE fileserver. The BIOS in the system reports the drive as being a 320GB, but FreeBSD (dmesg) sees it as a 305245MB (or 298GB drive) in two separate machines. When it has finally been formatted for use, I get 289GB of available space. Now, I understand that harddrive manufacturers measure things differently (1000kbytes per gbyte rather than 1024, or something like that) than expected, but I've been told by a few people that I should be getting around 305-312GB of available space after the drive has been formatted. sysinstall had to adjust the drive geometry because the reported one was 'invalid'. I tried to manually specify the geometry BIOS reported, but this too was rejected as invalid. BIOS Geometry-CYL/HD/SECT: 65535/16/255 Am I really getting the full potential out of this drive, or is something wrong? Thanks, -- Travis Poppe IRC: tlp @ irc.freenode.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 19:03:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB8E16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keith@barkinglizards.com) Received: from pluto.phpwebhosting.com (pluto.phpwebhosting.com [69.0.209.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2150F43D64 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:03:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keith@barkinglizards.com) Received: (qmail 12386 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 19:03:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Stile) (keith%barkinglizards.com@209.117.233.18) by pluto.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:03:29 -0500 From: "Keith Bottner" To: "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:03:31 -0600 Organization: Barking Lizards Technologies Message-ID: <01a601c60caa$8fc7d6d0$0e01a8c0@Stile> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYMqo7SHDOf8cdcQ52jl6X4wceYmQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: SCTP Kernel resource overhead X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:03:36 -0000 I am trying to find some information on what kernel resources are expended when creating an SCTP association. In particular I wanted to be able to compare a TCP connection to an SCTP association and see how the use of kernel resources between the two different protocols differ. Does anybody have an idea on where I can find such information? I am quite familiar with TCP and UDP and am interested to see if SCTP can replace a UDP implementation that has "reliability" added into the application level. The reason UDP is being used is due to the interconnectedness of the network of servers. If SCTP could be used instead then that would definately be the better solution. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Keith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 19:18:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DA816A41F; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:18:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D5743D53; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:18:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20051229191808.IIJE26442.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:18:08 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Travis Poppe" , , Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:18:03 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200512291202.51955.tlp@liquidx.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Harddrive size being reported incorrectly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:18:10 -0000 Just use FreeBSD's best guess and it will work fine. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Travis Poppe Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 2:03 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Harddrive size being reported incorrectly? Hello, I've recently purchased an IDE 320GB Western Digital WD3200JB-22KFA0 harddrive for use in my FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE fileserver. The BIOS in the system reports the drive as being a 320GB, but FreeBSD (dmesg) sees it as a 305245MB (or 298GB drive) in two separate machines. When it has finally been formatted for use, I get 289GB of available space. Now, I understand that harddrive manufacturers measure things differently (1000kbytes per gbyte rather than 1024, or something like that) than expected, but I've been told by a few people that I should be getting around 305-312GB of available space after the drive has been formatted. sysinstall had to adjust the drive geometry because the reported one was 'invalid'. I tried to manually specify the geometry BIOS reported, but this too was rejected as invalid. BIOS Geometry-CYL/HD/SECT: 65535/16/255 Am I really getting the full potential out of this drive, or is something wrong? Thanks, -- Travis Poppe IRC: tlp @ irc.freenode.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 19:20:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7F716A428 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD03B43D7C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:20:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 21969 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 19:20:44 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Dec 2005 19:20:44 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3DBD728423; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:20:43 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Travis Poppe References: <200512291202.51955.tlp@liquidx.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 29 Dec 2005 14:20:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200512291202.51955.tlp@liquidx.org> Message-ID: <444q4ryak4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 33 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Harddrive size being reported incorrectly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:20:59 -0000 Travis Poppe writes: > Hello, > > I've recently purchased an IDE 320GB Western Digital WD3200JB-22KFA0 > harddrive for use in my FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE fileserver. The BIOS in the system > reports the drive as being a 320GB, but FreeBSD (dmesg) sees it as a 305245MB > (or 298GB drive) in two separate machines. When it has finally been formatted > for use, I get 289GB of available space. > > Now, I understand that harddrive manufacturers measure things differently > (1000kbytes per gbyte rather than 1024, or something like that) than > expected, but I've been told by a few people that I should be getting around > 305-312GB of available space after the drive has been formatted. Well, no. 305245MB is (305245x1024x1024), or just a *hair* larger than 320 x 10e10 bytes. So what FreeBSD reports is exactly what you should expect from the manufacturer's specification. > sysinstall had to adjust the drive geometry because the reported one was > 'invalid'. I tried to manually specify the geometry BIOS reported, but this > too was rejected as invalid. > > BIOS Geometry-CYL/HD/SECT: 65535/16/255 C/H/S geometries are (more or less) fictitious these days anyway. I let the installer do what it wants, and haven't had a problem in a long time. > Am I really getting the full potential out of this drive, or is something > wrong? Looks like things are working fine. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 19:22:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3D116A41F; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:22:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.localelinks.com (web.localelinks.com [64.39.75.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B4743D5F; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:22:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (adsl-072-148-013-213.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [72.148.13.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localelinks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95035168; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:22:25 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id C510161C21; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:22:24 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:22:24 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Travis Poppe Message-ID: <20051229192224.GC63497@over-yonder.net> References: <200512291202.51955.tlp@liquidx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512291202.51955.tlp@liquidx.org> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-fullermd.2 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Harddrive size being reported incorrectly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:22:34 -0000 On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 12:02:51PM -0700 I heard the voice of Travis Poppe, and lo! it spake thus: > > reports the drive as being a 320GB, but FreeBSD (dmesg) sees it as a > 305245MB (or 298GB drive) in two separate machines. When it has > finally been formatted for use, I get 289GB of available space. > > Now, I understand that harddrive manufacturers measure things > differently (1000kbytes per gbyte rather than 1024, or something > like that) than expected, but I've been told by a few people that I > should be getting around 305-312GB of available space after the > drive has been formatted. Don't be told. Do the math. 320,000,000,000 bytes (hard drive manufacturer 'gigabytes'), divided by 1024 gives 312,500,000 kbytes, divided by 1024 gives 305,175.8 mbytes, divided by 1024 gives 298.023 gbytes according to a quick dc(1). -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 19:23:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6AE16A425; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:23:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEEA43D5D; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:22:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jBTJMniU000934; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:22:49 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jBTJMnYA000933; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:22:49 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200512291922.jBTJMnYA000933@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: tlp@liquidx.org (Travis Poppe) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:22:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200512291202.51955.tlp@liquidx.org> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Harddrive size being reported incorrectly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:23:11 -0000 > > Hello, > > I've recently purchased an IDE 320GB Western Digital WD3200JB-22KFA0 > harddrive for use in my FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE fileserver. The BIOS in the system > reports the drive as being a 320GB, but FreeBSD (dmesg) sees it as a 305245MB > (or 298GB drive) in two separate machines. When it has finally been formatted > for use, I get 289GB of available space. A nominal 320GB drive works out to 298.02 GB using the 1024 MB number system that the system uses. eg 320,000,000,000 / 1024 / 1024 / 1024 / 1024 = 298.02 or 320,000,000,000 / 1,073,741,824 = 298.02 > Now, I understand that harddrive manufacturers measure things differently > (1000kbytes per gbyte rather than 1024, or something like that) than > expected, but I've been told by a few people that I should be getting around > 305-312GB of available space after the drive has been formatted. They didn't do their arithmetic. When you slice and partition the drive, there will likely be a handful of sectors that don't round out to an even value so those are dropped. Then, when you do the newfs, some space is taken by the spare superblocks and finally the system reserves 8%. So, I would say you are getting it all. > sysinstall had to adjust the drive geometry because the reported one was > 'invalid'. I tried to manually specify the geometry BIOS reported, but this > too was rejected as invalid. Let the system do what it thinks is right. You are not losing any due to invalid geometry. > > BIOS Geometry-CYL/HD/SECT: 65535/16/255 > > Am I really getting the full potential out of this drive, or is something > wrong? Doesn't look like anything is wrong. It looks right. ////jerry > > Thanks, > -- > Travis Poppe > IRC: tlp @ irc.freenode.net > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 19:27:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF03E16A420 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:27:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F144B43D7B for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:27:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20051229192701.IZBY26442.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:27:01 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:27:00 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200512291015.44416.syjef@mdanderson.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: "Gestur A. Grjetarsson" Subject: RE: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:27:17 -0000 Gestur I need some clarification on your question. Are you saying that you were able to use FreeBSD on older versions of IBM BLADES or that you were able to use older FreeBSD versions before??? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jonathan Fosburgh Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 11:16 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Gestur A. Grjetarsson Subject: Re: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? On Wednesday 28 December 2005 07:32, Gestur A. Grjetarsson wrote: > Hi > > I have IBM Blade with Qlogic 2312 adapters using DS400 SAN > > now I have learned that after over 10 years of good FreeBSD experience on > various sorts of hardware, I can't use FreeBSD anymore as it does'nt work > on IBM Blade. I have read alot on this problem trying to solve this problem > and done alot of testing and hacking but without any progress. > > so I have two questions: > > is FreeBSD going to support IBM Blade? > > if it is going to support and work on IBM Blade, can you give me an > estimation on when it will be ready to run on IBM Blade? The blade center is a bizarre beast and it is difficult to make the officially supported Operating Systems work correctly with it. We had difficulties making AIX work properly on the JS20 blade, for instance. With IBM hardware, it is best to stick with officially supported products. Sometimes, IBM doesn't support something for a reason... I would be (pleasantly) surprised to laern you were able to attach FreeBSD to IBM storage. Of course, IBM will provide you with no help in either of these, and I wouldn't venture to guess if you can do concurrent maintenance on your DS4000 with FreeBSD running. -- Jonathan Fosburgh AIX and Storage Administrator UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 19:32:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517E816A41F; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tlp@liquidx.org) Received: from illusionist.sov.kewlio.net.uk (fxp-0.712-illusionist.sov.kewlio.net.uk [85.116.0.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A591843D7F; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tlp@liquidx.org) Received: from [192.168.0.18] (71-33-104-72.bois.qwest.net [71.33.104.72]) (authenticated bits=0 user=tlp) by illusionist.sov.kewlio.net.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBTJW2Ya050857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:32:04 GMT From: Travis Poppe To: Jerry McAllister Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:32:00 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200512291922.jBTJMnYA000933@clunix.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200512291922.jBTJMnYA000933@clunix.cl.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512291232.01100.tlp@liquidx.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Harddrive size being reported incorrectly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:32:13 -0000 On Thursday 29 December 2005 12:22 pm, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > Now, I understand that harddrive manufacturers measure things differently > > (1000kbytes per gbyte rather than 1024, or something like that) than > > expected, but I've been told by a few people that I should be getting > > around 305-312GB of available space after the drive has been formatted. > > They didn't do their arithmetic. > > When you slice and partition the drive, there will likely be a handful > of sectors that don't round out to an even value so those are dropped. > Then, when you do the newfs, some space is taken by the spare superblocks > and finally the system reserves 8%. So, I would say you are getting > it all. 289GB is before the 8% reservation. I actually turned that off with tunefs. Thanks to all who responded so quickly, makes me feel better about filling the drive up. Wanted to verify this before using the drive as to not end up having to re-newfs it in the future to gain back any possible unused space. Thanks, -- Travis Poppe IRC: tlp @ irc.freenode.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 19:38:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CE416A41F; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:38:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D2043D45; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:38:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from movens.plus.com ([80.229.231.20] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Es3bb-0007Vi-PP; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:38:31 +0000 Message-ID: <43B43B81.3050109@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:39:45 +0000 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Percival References: <200512071741.03088.kstewart@owt.com> <43B3EEF9.3010004@freebsd.org> <43B3F22D.5070601@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <43B3F22D.5070601@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kent Stewart , eoghan Subject: Re: pkgdb format X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:38:34 -0000 Colin Percival wrote: > Mark Ovens wrote: >> After reading this thread, I killed the upgrade, deleted INDEX-6, >> INDEX-6.db, and pkgdb.db; rebuilt pkgdb.db using `pkgdb -u' and re-ran >> `portupgrade -af' >> >> It started off OK (using dbm_hash) but after a couple of hours it had >> started continually rebuilding pkgdb.db. >> >> Anyone else got any ideas? > > I had exactly the same problem during portupgrading after a 5.4->6.0 > base system upgrade until I did a `portupgrade -fR portupgrade`, at > which point it stopped (and has been fine ever since). I have no idea > what the problem is or why this would fix it, but you might like to > try this and see if it helps. > Thanks! That seems to have fixed it for me too - it's now using bdb1_btree consistently :-) As to why, I'm not sure, but here's what upgrading portupgrade the way you suggested affects: /home/mark{101}# portupgrade -fRn portupgrade [snip] ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) + databases/db4 (db4-4.0.14_1,1) + lang/perl5.8 (perl-5.8.7_2) + lang/ruby18 (ruby-1.8.2_5,1) + databases/ruby-bdb (ruby18-bdb4-0.5.7) + sysutils/portupgrade (portupgrade-20051204) ---> Packages processed: 5 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed I don't know if any of those were actually upgraded or just reinstalled but databases/ruby-bdb looks like a candidate for being the culprit since portupgrade uses ruby so, if ruby itself and one or more of it's dependencies are out of sync it could explain it; i.e. if part of ruby got upgraded but not another by `portupgrade -af' - although if that is the case it is puzzling that when I aborted the first run, deleted the INDEX and pkgdb files that it ran OK for a while - the ports that had already been upgraded hadn't been downgraded Maybe portupgrade needs to be changed to upgrade itself upward-recursively first whenever the -a option is used? Thanks again for your help. Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 20:06:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D4C16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:06:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster5.tls.net (ecluster5.tls.net [65.196.224.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D263843D6D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:06:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 48560 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2005 20:06:08 -0000 Received: from 64-184-10-248.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (ldg%tls.net@64.184.10.248) by auth-ecluster5.tls.net with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 20:06:08 -0000 Message-ID: <43B441A9.6080807@pixelhammer.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:06:01 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Going from bind9 to djbdns X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:06:31 -0000 Kristian Vaaf wrote: > Hello! > > My friend, who hosts most of my stuff, is using djbdns. Probably for security and simplicity. > > Anyway I thought I'd do the same. But I'm having serious difficulties finding a user-friendly howto. > > I've basically picked stuff from here and there and put them together. > > Would this be what I need to set up a djbdns equivalent to http://www.home.no/hedhnta/namedb? Without reading through what you have (sorry, my hands are really full right now) I would suggest you check into http://lifewithdjbdns.org/ and DJB's own docs. The biggest issue you will face is, it is not as complicated as it seems. Follow the directions, join the list for djbdns. When posting to the list, outline what you are trying to do, what you have already tried, what sources of information you based your configuration on. Hope that helps. DAve > > -- > > Create users: > > tinydns > axfrdns > dnslog > dnscache > > -- > > Run these commands: > > mkdir /etc/tinydns > mkdir /etc/axfrdns > mkdir /etc/dnslog > mkdir /etc/dnscache > mkdir /etc/dnscache/root > mkdir /etc/dnscache/root/ip > mkdir /etc/dnscache/root/servers > > Should the above directories be set as home for the users above? > > -- > > Continue with: > > dnscache-conf dnscache dnslog /etc/dnscache 127.0.0.1 > > touch /etc/dnscache/root/ip/192.168.187.1 > touch /etc/dnscache/root/ip/192.168.187.2 > > echo 127.0.0.1 > /etc/dnscache/root/servers/mydomain.lan > echo 127.0.0.1 > /etc/dnscache/root/servers/187.168.192.in-addr.arpa > > tinydns-conf tinydns dnslog /etc/tinydns 213.187.181.70 > > axfrdns-conf axfrdns dnslog /etc/axfrdns /etc/tinydns 213.187.181.70 > > ln -s /etc/dnscache /service > ln -s /etc/tinydns /service > > svc -t /service/dnscache > > -- > > Would djbdns now have created this file for me? > > If so, can I skip this? If not, I take it I should: > > vim /etc/tinydns/data > > And type in: > > .mydomain.com::ns1.mydomain.com > @mydomain.com::mail.mydomain.com > =myhost.mydomain.com:213.181.112.43 > +mail.mydomain.com:213.181.112.43 > +www.mydomain.com:213.181.112.43 > > Then: > > cd /etc/tinydns > make > > -- > > To allow my 213.181.102.23 to be ns2.mydomain.com, I must do this? > > vi /etc/axfrdns/tcp > > And then type in: > > 213.181.102.23:allow,AXFR="*" > > I have a lot of domains. I want the ns2 to handle them all. > Is the wildcard "*" valid, or should I list them all? > > Anyway: > > cd /etc/axfrdns > make > > -- > > As for my zone files, I take it I could cram all my domains into the data file? > How would that look? > > -- > > That's it. > > I'm hoping that once everything is up, my configuration will be stored in files > that I can back up and easily redeploy incase of an accident (similar to my current > namedb setup I posted above). > > Thank you all, and happy new year! > Kristian Vaaf > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 20:30:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806E516A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:30:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LukeD@pobox.com) Received: from thorn.pobox.com (thorn.pobox.com [208.210.124.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72C743D67 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:30:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LukeD@pobox.com) Received: from thorn (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thorn.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DA6105 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:31:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pool-71-112-204-187.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net (pool-71-112-204-187.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.112.204.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thorn.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9DA1F63 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:31:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:30:47 -0800 (PST) From: Luke Dean X-X-Sender: lukas@border.crystalsphere.multiverse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051229115929.P1560@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Gripe about new dhclient X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Luke Dean List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:30:53 -0000 Ever since FreeBSD switched to OpenBSD's dhclient, I've had a serious problem. I'm running 6-STABLE as of earlier this week, but the problem has existed ever since we switched dhclients. Whenever I take the system offline long enough for the lease to expire, it will never get a new lease. On startup dhclient appears to broadcast requests for an IP address, but it never gets one. Once this situation occurs, the only way to get an IP address is to delete the leases file. I picked up this tip from someone on the list a few months ago, and it works. I even read that some people have gone so far as to create scripts that delete the leases file automatically somewhere in the boot process. I really don't want to do this. It's a hack and it defeats the purpose of having a leases file. This morning I spent an hour on the phone talking a nontechnical person through the process of deleting the leases file so we could get the server back online after it had been offline overnight, and I'm not going to do that again. I want to stick with the new dhclient program since it's the one that FreeBSD has adopted as its standard, but I can't live with this behavior. Does anyone have a good solution? my /etc/dhclient.conf is prepend domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1; my /etc/rc.conf contains ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" and does not override any standard behavior for dhclient. This machine connects directly to a DSL modem, so there's no firewalls or NAT to interfere with getting an IP address. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 20:34:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E7C16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:34:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswilson@ordizmelby.com) Received: from omaserver.ordizmelby.com (omaserver.ordizmelby.com [67.128.101.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1F343D53 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:34:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswilson@ordizmelby.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:34:47 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: NATD Internal Network problems Thread-Index: AcYMt09O7mZ7ZSlyTBOoR+HWFo4miQ== From: "Chris S. Wilson" To: Subject: NATD Internal Network problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:34:52 -0000 Hello! :) I am having a problem with freebsd 5.3-release and natd. When I try to connect to a service on my internal network to an IP on my external network that has a port redirected, it wont connect.=20 IE: 67.128.100.2 is my external IP, on my internal network I try to connect to 67.128.101.2:80 which is forwarded in my natd.conf and the connection is refused. Does anyone know why? My Config: IPFW Startup Script: /sbin/ipfw -f flush /sbin/ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via xl1 /sbin/ipfw add pass all from any to any Natd.conf: use_sockets yes same_ports yes redirect_port tcp 10.0.10.2:8- 67.128.100.2:80 Rc.conf gateway_enable=3D"YES" firewall_enable=3D"YES" natd_enable=3D"YES" natd_interface=3D"xl1" natd_flags=3D"-m -s -f /etc/natd.conf" Thanks! Chris W From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 20:38:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F9716A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:38:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC31E43D53 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:38:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o60so139706nfa for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:38:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=slqeoFxaj1B+MhIVkGdtkM88nfWBOEr41P8uZ9CGdqzf3BL4HmFmIBRcyhRo8e0LrvV6E+8UMNgPrdfpu5VbDIL5Prcov/bl4Lo5mjP72f7IftURQXzjrGJ2bxUC1uNE1f5sK9jA/5PleZplSCfhcG3pgvZrYCaiUNkrt6DwwvE= Received: by 10.48.202.12 with SMTP id z12mr377484nff; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:38:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.34.7 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:38:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:38:56 +0000 From: Soo-Hyun Choi Sender: soohyunc@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Java Server Pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:38:58 -0000 hi, apart from apache, what sort of things do i need to get JSP (java server pages) working? (maybe, do i need to manually install tomcat on top of apache?) thanks, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 20:41:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C16816A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:41:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71A043D46 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:41:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C3C5CFE; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:41:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07447-08; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:41:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC215C8B; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:41:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B44A0D.10905@mac.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:41:49 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chris S. Wilson" References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:41:36 -0000 Chris S. Wilson wrote: [ ... ] > IE: 67.128.100.2 is my external IP, on my internal network I try to > connect to 67.128.101.2:80 which is forwarded in my natd.conf and the > connection is refused. > > Does anyone know why? Change the "-" to a "0" in: redirect_port tcp 10.0.10.2:8- 67.128.100.2:80 ...? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 20:43:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FDB16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:43:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswilson@ordizmelby.com) Received: from omaserver.ordizmelby.com (omaserver.ordizmelby.com [67.128.101.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE4943D77 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:43:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswilson@ordizmelby.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:43:01 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: NATD Internal Network problems Thread-Index: AcYMuESz36w84KPKRr+V70qM4ibhyAAAB99g From: "Chris S. Wilson" To: "Chuck Swiger" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: NATD Internal Network problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:43:08 -0000 Hmm, still does'nt work. That seemed to be a typo however I still cant connect :( CW =20 -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswiger@mac.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:42 PM To: Chris S. Wilson Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems Chris S. Wilson wrote: [ ... ] > IE: 67.128.100.2 is my external IP, on my internal network I try to=20 > connect to 67.128.101.2:80 which is forwarded in my natd.conf and the=20 > connection is refused. >=20 > Does anyone know why? Change the "-" to a "0" in: redirect_port tcp 10.0.10.2:8- 67.128.100.2:80 ...? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 20:46:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E07516A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:46:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lalev@sv-bg.com) Received: from mail.sv-bg.com (ns.sv-bg.com [213.222.60.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF34243D48 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lalev@sv-bg.com) Received: (qmail 75529 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Dec 2005 22:49:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.12?) (lalev@sv-bg.com@213.222.60.195) by mail.sv-bg.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2005 22:49:13 -0000 Message-ID: <43B44B25.6030203@sv-bg.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:46:29 +0200 From: Angelin Lalev User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43B2729B.1030203@sv-bg.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: qmail + vpopmail + procmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:46:47 -0000 Michael P. Soulier wrote: >On 12/28/05, Angelin Lalev wrote: > > >>But now my friend's clients want all mail that is tagged as spam >>(in my case, prefixed with "[SPAM]" in the subject) moved to >>separate courier imap folder (for example .SPAM). >>I figured out (maybe I make error here) that I need procmail >>to deliver the mail to the different courier-imap folders in the Maildir. >>I couldn't find on the net clear algorithm that does that. (or at least >>I failed reproducing it). >>Anyone could help? >> >> > >This is up to the end user to do. My $HOME/.qmail looks like so > >| preline procmail ~/.procmailrc > >>From there, you can filter in .procmailrc like... > >:0 >^Subject:.*SPAM >$MAILDIR/junkmail/ > >where MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir, or some other appropriate place for the user's MUA. > > > > Thanks very much for the advice. I've tried something like that, but in the end of .procmailrc file I've piped the "regular" messages to vdelivermail, instead of delivering them directly (stupid, wasn't it :-)). I'm sure that it would work even that way, if I used -p option and correct paths in .procmailrc file. Anyway, I've read in the net that there is some incompatibility of exit codes between procmail and qmail. Since I was not sure if that's fixed, had no time to dig into the documentation and I was working on production system, decided to use maildrop, which did the job nicely. But I'm still curious if that incompatibility is fixed ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 20:54:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923E816A420 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:54:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2033943D45 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:54:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6286B5E8C; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:54:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20267-08; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:54:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762435E80; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:54:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B44D11.9010200@mac.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:54:41 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chris S. Wilson" References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:54:27 -0000 Chris S. Wilson wrote: > Hmm, still does'nt work. > > That seemed to be a typo however I still cant connect :( Does "telnet 10.0.10.2 80" from the firewall box work? Does normal NAT work OK (ie, can internal machines connect outside)? Does not using the external IP help: redirect_port tcp 10.0.10.2:80 80 Be prepared to invoke 'tcpdump' to see what is going on... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 20:56:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C35F16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswilson@ordizmelby.com) Received: from omaserver.ordizmelby.com (omaserver.ordizmelby.com [67.128.101.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FDD43D7D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:55:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswilson@ordizmelby.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:55:48 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: NATD Internal Network problems Thread-Index: AcYMug6XJKGlIik3TxiLCXKnHjSbMAAABDfA From: "Chris S. Wilson" To: "Chuck Swiger" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: NATD Internal Network problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:56:01 -0000 Everything works great from the nat box and from the outside (people are currently using it to get into my web server from the outside).=20 It's odd. CW. -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswiger@mac.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:55 PM To: Chris S. Wilson Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems Chris S. Wilson wrote: > Hmm, still does'nt work. >=20 > That seemed to be a typo however I still cant connect :( Does "telnet 10.0.10.2 80" from the firewall box work? Does normal NAT work OK (ie, can internal machines connect outside)? Does not using the external IP help: redirect_port tcp 10.0.10.2:80 80 Be prepared to invoke 'tcpdump' to see what is going on... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 21:01:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADEF16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:01:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4FA43D49 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:00:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISA0091I2LMM300@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:05:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:00:57 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:00:57 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <16ff39063d26.43b45c99@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: Subject: The hardships of ownerships X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:01:00 -0000 Hello! I am trying to arrange my user database properly. I am having a hard time keeping /etc/master.passwd from vipw in sync with /etc/group. It's quite a mystery trying to make them function as one entity. Why are they seperated into two files anyway? My group file has tons of groups that aren't even in master.passwd. Then, let's say I want to arrange the GIDs from group to go chronologically. Giving each group the ID of the port its daemon may or may not run on, seems to me like something a kid would do when there's no cartoons on TV. And let's say I do that, and edit my master.passwd with vipw accordingly. Just because I am seeking order in my things, my entire system has to suffer and most ownerships will be broken. I guess what I am asking for is this: does anybody have a script that updates your system according to your need to clean up your system? Thank you all for your time. Kristian Vaaf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 21:02:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B5C16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:02:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.brisbin@npcinternational.com) Received: from mail1.npci.com (mail.npcinternational.com [63.76.154.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA8F43D49 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:02:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.brisbin@npcinternational.com) Received: from fc63r41.npci.com ([172.16.0.131]) by mail1.npci.com (MOS 3.5.9-GR) with ESMTP id BZW35095 (AUTH via LOGINBEFORESMTP); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:53:48 -0600 (CST) From: Jon Brisbin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Soo-Hyun Choi In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: NPC International, Inc. Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:02:56 -0600 Message-Id: <1135890176.1249.6.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Java Server Pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:02:29 -0000 On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 20:38 +0000, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > hi, > > apart from apache, what sort of things do i need to get JSP (java > server pages) working? (maybe, do i need to manually install tomcat on > top of apache?) It doesn't actually work that way. You install Tomcat, Jetty, JBoss, Resin, or Enhydra (the top choices for JSP/Servlet containers) *alongside* Tomcat. You then either access the Tomcat server on it's own port (http://your-server:8080) or you install mod_jk in Apache and map certain URLs or patterns to your servlet container. We use JBoss, but if you're just looking to do plain JSP, you can get a tar-gz'd archive of tomcat and unzip it onto your BSD box. It's not necessary to install it from ports. Jetty and Resin seem like faster application servers, but I've had more trouble getting them configured than I have Tomcat. Maybe that's because I started with Tomcat back in the JServ days and am just more familiar with it. Good luck. Jon Brisbin Webmaster NPC International, Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 21:08:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB9716A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:08:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net (smtp2.suscom.net [64.78.83.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCD843D6D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp2.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A341CD87D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:06:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13172-07 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:06:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BA5F1CD84A for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:02:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBTL4YA6076643 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:04:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:04:38 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <44u0csq6ib.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <20051228081309.I95953@seibercom.net> <44u0csq6ib.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051229160037.E5E3.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Unable to install Webmin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:08:59 -0000 On Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:15:24 AM Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: Unable to install Webmin Wrote these words of wisdom: > Hmm. I can't reproduce the problem. > > Did you install from the port? > If so, did you set the rc.conf variable as instructed by the port? ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: Yes, I have the proper notation in rc.conf. The 'webmin' program is causing a perl.core dump, and I cannot fathom why. I have deleted and rebuilt everything, but still no success. I spoke to someone a day ago who said that they had webmin running fine and then suddenly one day it started doing the same thing as mine. They never got it to work either until they dumped the system and started over. I am not about to go that route. I have no idea what to do with the perl.core file. Perhaps someone knows how to debug this situation. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 21:22:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6DD16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:22:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A664C43D4C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:22:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISA009GT3L2M310@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:27:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:22:13 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:22:13 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <17f28a361ee3.43b46195@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: Subject: Re: The hardships of ownerships X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:22:19 -0000 This is how I want my users layout to look like. Ofcourse I'm afraid to actually commit these changes, since I'm afraid my entire system will break. But there has to be a way to deal with this! # cat /etc/group (imaginary) nobody:*:55555: wheel:*:0:root daemon:*:1: operator:*:2:root kmem:*:3: bin:*:4: tty:*:5: news:*:8: man:*:9: sshd:*:101: www:*:102: ftp:*:103: mysql:*:104: proxy:*:105: smmsp:*:106: mailnull:*:107: postfix:*:108: cyrus:*:109: spamd:*:110: vscan:*:111: clamav:*:112: tinydns:*:113: axfrdns:*:114: dnscache:*:115: dnslog:*:116: nomad:*:1002: polvott:*:1003: nughaud:*:1004: asphyx:*:1005: speak:*:1007: zarul:*:1008: sky:*:1009: spamd:*:58: indranil:*:1010: stila:*:1011: mats:*:1012: edgar:*:1014: holy5:*:1015: # cat /etc/master.passwd (imaginary) nobody:*:55555:55555::0:0:Unprivileged:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin root:$1$xsL49xbt$of5hvUCiVT/b/D3B70bZv1:0:0::0:0:Core:/root:/usr/local/bin/zsh (starts from 1) daemon:*:1:1::0:0:System processes:/root:/usr/sbin/nologin operator:*:2:2::0:0:Operator:/:/usr/sbin/nologin kmem:*:3:65533::0:0:KMem:/:/usr/sbin/nologin bin:*:4:4::0:0:Binaries:/:/usr/sbin/nologin tty:*:5:65533::0:0:Titty:/:/usr/sbin/nologin news:*:8:8::0:0:News:/:/usr/sbin/nologin man:*:9:9::0:0:Manuals:/usr/share/man:/usr/sbin/nologin (starts from 101) sshd:*:101:101::0:0:Secure Shell:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin www:*:102:102::0:0:World Wide Web:/usr/local/www:/usr/sbin/nologin ftp:*:103:103::0:0:PureFTP:/home/websites:/usr/sbin/nologin mysql:*:104:104::0:0:MySQL:/var/db/mysql:/sbin/nologin proxy:*:105:105::0:0:Packet Filter:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin smmsp:*:106:106::0:0:Sendmail Submission:/var/spool/clientmqueue:/usr/sbin/nologin mailnull:*:107:107::0:0:Sendmail Default:/var/spool/mqueue:/usr/sbin/nologin postfix:*:108:108::0:0:Postfix:/var/spool/postfix:/usr/sbin/nologin cyrus:*:109:109::1111874400:0:Cyrus:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin spamd:*:110:110::0:0:SpamAssassin:/var/spool/spamd:/sbin/nologin vscan:*:111:111::0:0:Scanner:/var/amavis:/bin/sh clamav:*:112:112::0:0:ClamAV:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin tinydns:*:113:113::0:0:Tiny:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin axfrdns:*:114:114::0:0:A-Transfer:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin dnscache:*:115:115::0:0:Cache:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin dnslog:*:116:116::0:0:Logging:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin (starts from 1001) johann:*:1001:0::0:0:Johann:/home/johann:/usr/local/bin/zsh nomad:*:1002:1002::0:0:Hednod:/home/nomad:/usr/local/bin/zsh polvott:*:1003:1003::0:0:Thomas:/home/polvott:/usr/local/bin/zsh nughaud:*:1004:1004::0:0:King:/home/nughaud:/usr/local/bin/zsh asphyx:*:1005:1005::0:0:Matthew:/home/asphyx:/usr/local/bin/zsh speak:*:1007:1007::0:0:Poetry:/home/speak:/usr/local/bin/zsh zarul:*:1008:1008::0:0:Zarul:/home/zarul:/usr/local/bin/zsh sky:*:1009:1009::0:0:High:/home/sky:/usr/local/bin/zsh indranil:*:1010:1010::0:0:Troidus:/home/indranil:/usr/local/bin/zsh stila:*:1011:1011::0:0:Standup:/home/stila:/usr/local/bin/zsh mats:*:1012:1012::0:0:Kohler:/home/mats:/usr/local/bin/zsh cole:*:1013:1013::0:0:Cole:/home/cole:/usr/local/bin/zsh edgar:*:1014:1014::0:0:Otero:/home/edgar:/usr/local/bin/zsh holy5:*:1015:1015::0:0:Khanira:/home/holy5:/usr/local/bin/zsh I guess I'm a sucker for correctness ... All the best, Kristian Vaaf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 21:25:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BF316A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:25:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C7543D5F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:25:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISA009PC3QFLX10@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:30:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:25:26 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:25:26 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <1818d1d83da8.43b46256@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: Subject: The hardships of ownerships (part 3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:25:29 -0000 I cannot RE: my own e-mails? Strange ... Anyway, I had to correct these: -- daemon:*:1: operator:*:2:root kmem:*:3: bin:*:4: tty:*:5: news:*:6: man:*:7: -- daemon:*:1:1::0:0:System Processes:/root:/usr/sbin/nologin operator:*:2:2::0:0:Operator:/:/usr/sbin/nologin kmem:*:3:65533::0:0:KMem:/:/usr/sbin/nologin bin:*:4:4::0:0:Binaries:/:/usr/sbin/nologin tty:*:5:65533::0:0:Titty:/:/usr/sbin/nologin news:*:6:6::0:0:News:/:/usr/sbin/nologin man:*:7:7::0:0:Manuals:/usr/share/man:/usr/sbin/nologin -- Bye! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 21:34:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5716516A420; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:34:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D825243D46; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:34:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jBTLYaiU001274; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:34:36 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jBTLYaSH001273; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:34:36 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200512292134.jBTLYaSH001273@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: tlp@liquidx.org (Travis Poppe) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:34:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200512291232.01100.tlp@liquidx.org> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Harddrive size being reported incorrectly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:34:38 -0000 > > On Thursday 29 December 2005 12:22 pm, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > Now, I understand that harddrive manufacturers measure things differently > > > (1000kbytes per gbyte rather than 1024, or something like that) than > > > expected, but I've been told by a few people that I should be getting > > > around 305-312GB of available space after the drive has been formatted. > > > > They didn't do their arithmetic. > > > > When you slice and partition the drive, there will likely be a handful > > of sectors that don't round out to an even value so those are dropped. > > Then, when you do the newfs, some space is taken by the spare superblocks > > and finally the system reserves 8%. So, I would say you are getting > > it all. > > 289GB is before the 8% reservation. I actually turned that off with tunefs. I strongly suggest you do not do that - at least completely off. Reduce it some, if you like, but keep some. ////jerry > > Thanks to all who responded so quickly, makes me feel better about filling the > drive up. Wanted to verify this before using the drive as to not end up > having to re-newfs it in the future to gain back any possible unused space. > > Thanks, > -- > Travis Poppe > IRC: tlp @ irc.freenode.net > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 21:43:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBA216A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:43:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E211E43D72 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:43:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from axelds.demon.nl ([83.160.138.74]:37798 helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Es5YG-0000tX-5X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:43:12 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" To: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:42:48 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Thread-Index: AcYMwM+gVbVUAppURIiq2Or0iP8vlw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: sendmail-submit and envelope-from X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:43:17 -0000 Hi all, I hope someone could help me out with the following : On 5.4 I'm running a few jails, one of which is running the mail::toaster incarnation of qmail. All is well. From another jail I want to use a php script to generate mailings rewriting the envelope-from: This does work on a different system, not running on jails with a non ports compile of qmail (not installed by me). The main difference here being that on the 'working system', the mail-sendmail wrapper is used instead of sendmail. So I went and tested the same script on the qmail jail, which has the same 'problem' as sendmail does from the other jail. So something seems to have been changed on this setup to allow this behaviour (I assume having 'From', rewrite both return address and the envelope-from). I can't for the life of me figure out what. Oh, and unrelated but also annoying is the submit from the different jails to the qmail jail is a bit slow. Any pointers anyone ? Thanks, Ruben ( I already sent this to isp-freebsd, but I'm guessing questions might also have some answers) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 22:07:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B7116A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:07:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (ns1.ecoms.com [207.44.130.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9533543D5E for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:07:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (localhost.roq.com [127.0.0.1]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9284CAE0; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:07:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ppp157-158.static.internode.on.net [150.101.157.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1576B4C9A0; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:07:32 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <43B45E18.1000108@roq.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:07:20 +1100 From: Michael Vince User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kiffin Gish References: <1135855260.1034.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1135855260.1034.5.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:07:23 -0000 Kiffin Gish wrote: >I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 6.0 and noticed the introduction of >option SCHED_ULE for supporting multi-processor environments. > >However, I understood that using SCHED_ULE with only one CPU can also >improve performance significantly. > >Is this true, and if so, what are the risks involved dropping good old >SCHED_4BSD for the new-and-improved scheduler? > >Thanks alot in advance. > > > I was benchmarking a Java servlet under ULE a few weeks ago, and I couldn't get result scores as high under ULE as I could under the regular the 4BSD (although it wasn't too far off) and when I left the machine benchmarking all night under ULE I came back in the morning to find the machine unresponsive and in need of a hard reboot. Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 22:10:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5695E16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:10:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.brisbin@npcinternational.com) Received: from mail1.npci.com (mail.npcinternational.com [63.76.154.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C6443D46 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:10:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.brisbin@npcinternational.com) Received: from fc63r41.npci.com ([172.16.0.131]) by mail1.npci.com (MOS 3.5.9-GR) with ESMTP id BZW35748 (AUTH via LOGINBEFORESMTP); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:00:37 -0600 (CST) From: Jon Brisbin To: FreeBSD Qs Content-Type: text/plain Organization: NPC International, Inc. Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:09:46 -0600 Message-Id: <1135894186.1249.10.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: I just can't find GCJ on my FreeBSD 6 box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:10:02 -0000 I installed GCC 4.1 twice, thinking I just missed it. I can't find any of the gcj tools on my BSD 6 box. I made extra double sure that Java was compiled into GCC, but the gcj tools are nowhere to be found. Am I doing something wrong? I'm trying to follow the instructions here: http://developer.classpath.org/mediation/ClasspathShowcase#head-7d9a556e8485fc84fd5ce0e52be6104d85e24316 I have this in 4.1 on my PowerBook, but I can't find the darn thing on BSD. Where is it? How can I use gcj on BSD? Can I? Thanks! Jon Brisbin Webmaster NPC International, Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 22:24:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6C216A420 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:24:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9962543D6D for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:24:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o60so145949nfa for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:24:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=m7wZr9j7/GQhYa8d/MAwVQNOI4El0RDnPbDlu0vHCJF2dseYIDF/4oZ3kKbciEtJAZ23qb7F0JpiflReOZQ7/safDnSaDAtsllUfBxx4vbgFQSWjxXmHoHnOceJ8+9N7gb/L5nfOCunaIPk4WW6sXL2pMwkODXmBxaSWjsRmAO4= Received: by 10.48.247.14 with SMTP id u14mr381622nfh; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:24:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.34.7 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:24:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:24:51 +0000 From: Soo-Hyun Choi Sender: soohyunc@gmail.com To: Jon Brisbin In-Reply-To: <1135890176.1249.6.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1135890176.1249.6.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Java Server Pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:24:54 -0000 So what you mean is that I need to install Tomcat alongside Apache? Is this correct? On 12/29/05, Jon Brisbin wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 20:38 +0000, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > > hi, > > > > apart from apache, what sort of things do i need to get JSP (java > > server pages) working? (maybe, do i need to manually install tomcat on > > top of apache?) > > It doesn't actually work that way. You install Tomcat, Jetty, JBoss, > Resin, or Enhydra (the top choices for JSP/Servlet containers) > *alongside* Tomcat. You then either access the Tomcat server on it's own > port (http://your-server:8080) or you install mod_jk in Apache and map > certain URLs or patterns to your servlet container. > > We use JBoss, but if you're just looking to do plain JSP, you can get a > tar-gz'd archive of tomcat and unzip it onto your BSD box. It's not > necessary to install it from ports. > > Jetty and Resin seem like faster application servers, but I've had more > trouble getting them configured than I have Tomcat. Maybe that's because > I started with Tomcat back in the JServ days and am just more familiar > with it. > > Good luck. > > Jon Brisbin > Webmaster > NPC International, Inc. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 22:50:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8910916A420 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:50:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA16E43D45 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:50:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94748210135 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:50:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22987-01-3 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:50:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1931B210176 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:50:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBTMoPZW054851 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:50:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (ges@localhost) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jBTMoPcV054848 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:50:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) X-Authentication-Warning: seibercom.net: ges owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:50:25 -0500 (EST) From: Gerard Seibert To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20051229174623.M48160@seibercom.net> Organization: Seibercom.NET MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Threaded version of Perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:50:45 -0000 Is there any real advantage to building a threaded version of Perl? What are the disadvantages, if any? -- Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Vini, vidi, velcro... I came, I saw, I stuck around From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 22:57:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28AC16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:57:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@enth.net) Received: from emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org (emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org [64.54.46.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC4143D58 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:57:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@enth.net) Received: from 64.54.128.151 by emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org with ESMTP (Tumbleweed Email Firewall SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.1.0)); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:04:31 -0800 X-Server-Uuid: 44B63953-633F-4500-B2DA-A3E478718104 Received: from exchange.ucsf.edu ([64.54.134.41]) by EXVS05.net.ucsf.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:57:08 -0800 Received: from [10.174.13.141] ([152.132.10.134]) by exchange.ucsf.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:57:08 -0800 Message-ID: <43B469C5.60700@enth.net> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:57:09 -0800 From: "Derek Flenniken" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2005 22:57:08.0591 (UTC) FILETIME=[322667F0:01C60CCB] X-WSS-ID: 6FAAB4F51FG694952-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 6.0 Installed on Adaptec 2100S RAID 5 But Won't Boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:57:17 -0000 I am able to install with no problems. RAID5 "Drive" is visible for slice creation, partition. Use Entire Disk + Set Bootable FreeBSD Boot Manager Default Partition Scheme If I install again I see my slice and partitions from the previous install. I've gone through the configurations with the 2100S and can't find anything wrong with the settings. System POSTs, 2100S POSTs, then blinking cursor for a while and finally a No OS message. Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 23:04:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0688416A420 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:04:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C96543D5A for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:04:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBTN4pG1035228; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:04:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43B46B93.4020403@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:04:51 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chris S. Wilson" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:04:53 -0000 Chris S. Wilson wrote: > Hello! :) > > I am having a problem with freebsd 5.3-release and natd. > > When I try to connect to a service on my internal network to an IP on my > external network that has a port redirected, it wont connect. > > IE: 67.128.100.2 is my external IP, on my internal network I try to > connect to 67.128.101.2:80 which is forwarded in my natd.conf and the > connection is refused. > > Does anyone know why? I don't know the exact technical reasons "why" but I will confirm for you that this simply does not work, and the reasons why center around it being a rather tortured mess. Your inside machines should reach your inside server by its inside address. Think about how you're sending your request outside the firewall (getting the request NATed on the way out) and then back in (getting the request re-NATed), and then having the reply packets from the web server have to take the reverse of that path. Yuck. Use split DNS so that that "www.example.com" appears to external clients as being your external NAT server address, and appears to inside clients as the web server's real inside address. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 23:08:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9870816A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:08:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswilson@ordizmelby.com) Received: from omaserver.ordizmelby.com (omaserver.ordizmelby.com [67.128.101.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340F343D46 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:08:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswilson@ordizmelby.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:08:25 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: NATD Internal Network problems Thread-Index: AcYMzEhBf0+q/Y2/TwyWmbMARI8+3gAACYdQ From: "Chris S. Wilson" To: "Greg Barniskis" Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: RE: NATD Internal Network problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:08:27 -0000 Weird, every other router I've used forwards all the packets properly, even my backup linksys when I hook it up. Really I don't want to do the split dns stuff, sadly I will have to move away from FreeBSD for performing this operation I guess. Thanks for the help! CW.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Greg Barniskis [mailto:nalists@scls.lib.wi.us]=20 Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 3:05 PM To: Chris S. Wilson Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems Chris S. Wilson wrote: > Hello! :) >=20 > I am having a problem with freebsd 5.3-release and natd. >=20 > When I try to connect to a service on my internal network to an IP on=20 > my external network that has a port redirected, it wont connect. >=20 > IE: 67.128.100.2 is my external IP, on my internal network I try to=20 > connect to 67.128.101.2:80 which is forwarded in my natd.conf and the=20 > connection is refused. >=20 > Does anyone know why? I don't know the exact technical reasons "why" but I will confirm for you that this simply does not work, and the reasons why center around it being a rather tortured mess. Your inside machines should reach your inside server by its inside address. Think about how you're sending your request outside the firewall (getting the request NATed on the way out) and then back in (getting the request re-NATed), and then having the reply packets from the web server have to take the reverse of that path. Yuck. Use split DNS so that that "www.example.com" appears to external clients as being your external NAT server address, and appears to inside clients as the web server's real inside address. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 00:05:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02DF16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:05:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6237E43D49 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:05:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBU055G1036473; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:05:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43B479B1.6000605@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:05:05 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chris S. Wilson" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:05:06 -0000 Chris S. Wilson wrote: > Weird, every other router I've used forwards all the packets properly, > even my backup linksys when I hook it up. Probably works there because there's not a very complex packet filtering operation in the middle when using an off-the-shelf router. Keep in mind that I'm speaking from distant memory. What you describe doesn't work for me, never did, and I know it's been talked about on this list as being an undesirable thing to do anyway, given that there are better alternatives than torturing your packets. You can possibly make FreeBSD do what you want, but (IIRC) it's going to take some ipfw wizardry, or whatever you're using to drive packets into natd. Also, I believe the result of that is that you'd have to create a less secure set of rules about what is permitted to pass. In other words the real reason this doesn't work is that as a best practice, it shouldn't. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 00:43:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE7A16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awc@candhsoftware.com) Received: from zeppo.candhsoftware.com (wsip-68-98-220-134.ph.ph.cox.net [68.98.220.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8885B43D45 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awc@candhsoftware.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([12.164.192.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeppo.candhsoftware.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBU0hKfL096468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:43:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from awc@candhsoftware.com) From: Andy W Clements To: Soo-Hyun Choi In-Reply-To: References: <1135890176.1249.6.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: C & H Software L.L.C. Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:31:00 -0700 Message-Id: <1135902660.1876.22.camel@misato.candhsoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jon Brisbin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Java Server Pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: awc@candhsoftware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:43:23 -0000 That is correct... and you can use mod_jk to connect them. http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/ that page contains the download and the instructions --Andy On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 22:24 +0000, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > So what you mean is that I need to install Tomcat alongside Apache? Is > this correct? > > On 12/29/05, Jon Brisbin wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 20:38 +0000, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > apart from apache, what sort of things do i need to get JSP (java > > > server pages) working? (maybe, do i need to manually install tomcat on > > > top of apache?) > > > > It doesn't actually work that way. You install Tomcat, Jetty, JBoss, > > Resin, or Enhydra (the top choices for JSP/Servlet containers) > > *alongside* Tomcat. You then either access the Tomcat server on it's own > > port (http://your-server:8080) or you install mod_jk in Apache and map > > certain URLs or patterns to your servlet container. > > > > We use JBoss, but if you're just looking to do plain JSP, you can get a > > tar-gz'd archive of tomcat and unzip it onto your BSD box. It's not > > necessary to install it from ports. > > > > Jetty and Resin seem like faster application servers, but I've had more > > trouble getting them configured than I have Tomcat. Maybe that's because > > I started with Tomcat back in the JServ days and am just more familiar > > with it. > > > > Good luck. > > > > Jon Brisbin > > Webmaster > > NPC International, Inc. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 00:48:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC8916A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:48:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19F43D5A for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:48:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyunc@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o60so152860nfa for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:48:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YQVwaJ4+ho5uVeutCvw3ojsBxOb4jN1yodTf1MMk/9N8uqlJFaDBIVdMxNED9Rv83FH574ml3ubhrb9XBjO8IjIE1NcOLdGNm2smBO1pDRhzcGRx8AdIXz3jKmN3LiJ1kRfKQRA/V8DydFczdmSbkd/DJ/n4ovWraK3vwHIcMtY= Received: by 10.49.42.7 with SMTP id u7mr386754nfj; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:48:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.34.7 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:48:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:48:12 +0000 From: Soo-Hyun Choi Sender: soohyunc@gmail.com To: awc@candhsoftware.com In-Reply-To: <1135902660.1876.22.camel@misato.candhsoftware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1135890176.1249.6.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> <1135902660.1876.22.camel@misato.candhsoftware.com> Cc: Jon Brisbin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Java Server Pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:48:15 -0000 So, if I get the information all together, I need Apache, Tomcat, and the connector (mod_jk). Right? Thanks, On 12/30/05, Andy W Clements wrote: > That is correct... and you can use mod_jk to connect them. > http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/ > that page contains the download and the instructions > > --Andy > > > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 22:24 +0000, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > > So what you mean is that I need to install Tomcat alongside Apache? Is > > this correct? > > > > On 12/29/05, Jon Brisbin wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 20:38 +0000, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > apart from apache, what sort of things do i need to get JSP (java > > > > server pages) working? (maybe, do i need to manually install tomcat= on > > > > top of apache?) > > > > > > It doesn't actually work that way. You install Tomcat, Jetty, JBoss, > > > Resin, or Enhydra (the top choices for JSP/Servlet containers) > > > *alongside* Tomcat. You then either access the Tomcat server on it's = own > > > port (http://your-server:8080) or you install mod_jk in Apache and ma= p > > > certain URLs or patterns to your servlet container. > > > > > > We use JBoss, but if you're just looking to do plain JSP, you can get= a > > > tar-gz'd archive of tomcat and unzip it onto your BSD box. It's not > > > necessary to install it from ports. > > > > > > Jetty and Resin seem like faster application servers, but I've had mo= re > > > trouble getting them configured than I have Tomcat. Maybe that's beca= use > > > I started with Tomcat back in the JServ days and am just more familia= r > > > with it. > > > > > > Good luck. > > > > > > Jon Brisbin > > > Webmaster > > > NPC International, Inc. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 01:20:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C1E16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:20:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rocky@pokpok.com) Received: from awacs.takachiho.com.hk (siteangel-hk.bmc.com [202.153.119.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3566243D5C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:20:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rocky@pokpok.com) Received: from HKGKWNT001 ([202.82.51.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by awacs.takachiho.com.hk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBU1Jw4V010094 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:19:59 +0800 (HKT) (envelope-from rocky@pokpok.com) Message-ID: <00c301c60cdf$26a02e70$4d02a8c0@HKGKWNT001> From: "rocky" To: Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:19:57 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-awacs-MailScanner-Information: Antivirus/AntiSpam by AWACS.Takachiho X-awacs-MailScanner: Mail is disinfected, check my ClamAV X-awacs-MailScanner-From: rocky@pokpok.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: SATA 80G HDD can't detect X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rocky List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:20:20 -0000 Dear all, =20 Currently I am facing a very big problem. I got the Dell PE850 server, which is running SATA with 80G HDD, but I = try to boot it up and install the FreeBSD6.0, it can detect the Disk Controller but any HDD. In the boot up screen, it show me the chipset is ICH7. Please help. Thank you Rocky From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 02:20:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9254516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@enth.net) Received: from emfmcb01.ucsfmedicalcenter.org (emfmcb01.ucsfmedicalcenter.org [64.54.46.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFCE43D45 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:20:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@enth.net) Received: from 64.54.128.151 by emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org with ESMTP (Tumbleweed Email Firewall SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.1.0)); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:28:10 -0800 X-Server-Uuid: 44B63953-633F-4500-B2DA-A3E478718104 Received: from exfe03.net.ucsf.edu ([64.54.134.43]) by EXVS05.net.ucsf.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:20:47 -0800 Received: from [10.174.13.141] ([152.132.10.134]) by exfe03.net.ucsf.edu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:20:46 -0800 Message-ID: <43B49980.9050202@enth.net> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:20:48 -0800 From: "Derek Flenniken" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43B469C5.60700@enth.net> In-Reply-To: <43B469C5.60700@enth.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Dec 2005 02:20:46.0354 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4811720:01C60CE7] X-WSS-ID: 6FAA44B01FG704385-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 Installed on Adaptec 2100S RAID 5 But Won't Boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:20:58 -0000 Solved. Something in the BIOS. I reset to defaults, then re-configured. Only thing that's different is that it boots now. Derek Derek Flenniken wrote: > I am able to install with no problems. RAID5 "Drive" is visible for > slice creation, partition. > > Use Entire Disk + Set Bootable > FreeBSD Boot Manager > Default Partition Scheme > > If I install again I see my slice and partitions from the previous > install. > > I've gone through the configurations with the 2100S and can't find > anything wrong with the settings. > > System POSTs, 2100S POSTs, then blinking cursor for a while and > finally a No OS message. > > Any ideas? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 03:38:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE32816A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:38:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E40A43D49 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:38:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA96478 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:38:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:39:13 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: FreeBSD Questions List Message-ID: <20051229220507.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Mozilla plugins broken after port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:38:26 -0000 Yesterday I cvsup'ed and upgraded my ports, using the procedure I've been using for quite some time. After it was done, most of my Mozilla plug-ins no longer work. I did not upgrade my operating system at that time, since I'm already at the latest patchlevel. The specific issues are with acroread7, flash and mplayer-plugin. All of these worked as plug-ins before the upgrade, but now none of them do. Acroread7 and mplayer work fine in their standalone application incarnations, but not as plug-ins. Curiously, the java plug-in still works fine. In Mozilla, about:plugins shows java and the mplayer stuff, but not anything pertaining to Acrobat or PDFs. Here is what I've done to try to fix this: tripel# mv /etc/libmap.conf /etc/libmap.conf.old tripel# cp /usr/local/share/examples/linuxpluginwrapper/libmap.conf-FreeBSD5-stable /etc/libmap.conf /etc/libmap.conf - both the new and old versions - have an entry like # Acrobat7 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror/Kazehakase [/usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so] libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/acrobat.so libc.so.6 exists; it's a symlink to libc-2.3.2.so, both in /usr/compat/linux/lib. However, the path shown in [square brackets] does not exist. Does it need to? man libc.conf doesn't say anything about those square bracket entries. On the off chance, I tried creating that heirarchy of directories and touch'ing nppdf.so, but no love so I got rid of it. $ ls /usr/local/lib/pluginwrapper acrobat.so flash7.so java3d.so oci8.so realplayer.so flash6.so jai.so java3d_snd.so pips.so A search of the list archive turned up a post saying that you have to have linprocfs mounted *before* doing the *install* on linuxpluginwrapper. I made that happen; relevant df output is Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on linprocfs 4 4 0 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc I then deinstalled the following via 'make deinstall', then did 'make reinstall' in this order: print/acroread7 www/mozilla www/linuxpluginwrapper www/linux-flashplugin www/mplayer-plugin Question: Can someone point me to a writeup of what I need to do, in what order, to repair this? Thanks very much. $ uname -a FreeBSD tripel.monochrome.org 5.4-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8 #0: Thu Oct 13 22:12:04 EDT 2005 chris@tripel.monochrome.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TRIPEL i386 -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 03:47:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49FD16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:47:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: from larfur.svaka.net (larfur.svaka.net [213.176.155.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028F543D4C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:47:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: (from root@localhost) by larfur.svaka.net (MX.SVAKA.NET) id jBU3l0Wx058488; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:47:00 GMT (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: from ipfw.ecweb.local (ipfw.ec.is [213.220.85.70]) by larfur.svaka.net (mx1.svaka.net) with ESMTP id jBU3ktXC058233; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:47:00 GMT (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) Received: from ec.is (postur.ecweb.local [192.168.25.11]) by ipfw.ecweb.local (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBU3oBVS015471; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:50:12 GMT (envelope-from gestur@ec.is) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:52:19 -0000 Message-ID: <636A75F5E9CA8741A3136582949F95876E9EB4@postur.ecweb.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? Thread-Index: AcYMrqcDdTPpbNqdTH63zGVZHKYn6QAQ8qSQ From: "Gestur A. Grjetarsson" To: , X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.2 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,RCVD_IN_DSBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS,USER_IN_WHITELIST scanned=Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:47:00 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on larfur.svaka.net X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1219/Wed Dec 28 22:57:59 2005 on larfur.svaka.net X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1219/Wed Dec 28 22:57:59 2005 on ipfw.ecweb.local X-Virus-Status: Clean X-scanner: Scanned by Xamime-LT 0.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:47:29 -0000 hi no, I haven't been able to use any version of FreeBSD. I did try to boot the IBM Blade on all of the available versions on = ftp.freebsd.org ,, but with no success. I got some info from the internet that FreeBSD version 4.1 would work, = but I tried that and it didn't work. when booting Blade from mounted iso or from cdrom install disk, I always = stop in OK prompt, where I get error about the boot loader not finding = kernel or device, when using the lsdev I find that the cdrom device is = vanished, so there is no media to load kernel from, this happens both = when trying to boot from mounted iso or the built in cdrom. I've learned that the only way to boot the system is using FreeBSD = floppies, that I upload to the usb flash memory, ie. I upload boot = floppy, start the system, upload the kern1.flp when the system request = it and then upload the second kern floppy etc.etc. until I get the = system running in sysinstall for initial setup. With that, I find that there is no hard disk available, no lun to mount = from the DS400 SAN, only disk device is the USB flash memory. The ISP driver is completely broken and not able to detect any disk = device from my IBM Blade Center which has Qlogic 2312 FC controller. When I contacted the IBM service for technical help on this severe = problem, they informed me that this matter is 100% a FreeBSD problem, = not anything that IBM should worry about, no help there. This is very bad for me, as I've used FreeBSD as the foundation for my = services, have been using it since 1993, and am forced to use Gentoo = which has no problems with the IBM Blade. If needed, I'm willing to work with any one that is capable on getting = the IBM Blade to work and I'm also positive on giving some time for = getting the FreeBSD to install and detect all hardware on my IBM Blade = Center if needed. I think this is something that FreeBSD community = needs to get resolved quickly... as the Blade Centers are getting more = popular day by day. kve=F0ja / Best regards Gestur =20 -----Original Message----- From: fbsd_user [mailto:fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com]=20 Sent: 29. desember 2005 19:27 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Gestur A. Grjetarsson Subject: RE: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? Gestur I need some clarification on your question. Are you saying that you were able to use FreeBSD on older versions of = IBM BLADES or that you were able to use older FreeBSD versions before??? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jonathan = Fosburgh Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 11:16 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Gestur A. Grjetarsson Subject: Re: FreeBSD on IBM Blade Center? On Wednesday 28 December 2005 07:32, Gestur A. Grjetarsson wrote: > Hi > > I have IBM Blade with Qlogic 2312 adapters using DS400 SAN > > now I have learned that after over 10 years of good FreeBSD experience on > various sorts of hardware, I can't use FreeBSD anymore as it does'nt work > on IBM Blade. I have read alot on this problem trying to solve this problem > and done alot of testing and hacking but without any progress. > > so I have two questions: > > is FreeBSD going to support IBM Blade? > > if it is going to support and work on IBM Blade, can you give me an > estimation on when it will be ready to run on IBM Blade? The blade center is a bizarre beast and it is difficult to make the = officially supported Operating Systems work correctly with it. We had = difficulties making AIX work properly on the JS20 blade, for instance. = With IBM hardware, it is best to stick with officially supported = products. Sometimes, IBM doesn't support something for a reason... I would be (pleasantly) surprised to laern you were able to attach = FreeBSD to IBM storage. Of course, IBM will provide you with no help in = either of these, and I wouldn't venture to guess if you can do = concurrent maintenance on your DS4000 with FreeBSD running. -- Jonathan Fosburgh AIX and Storage Administrator UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 04:15:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4C716A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:15:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84E8E43D46 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:15:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 5002 invoked by uid 502); 30 Dec 2005 04:15:45 -0000 Received: from dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.97.72) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Dec 2005 04:15:45 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.97.72 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com Message-ID: <43B4B46F.30305@ywave.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:15:43 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Hill References: <20051229220507.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20051229220507.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Mozilla plugins broken after port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:15:49 -0000 Chris Hill wrote: > Yesterday I cvsup'ed and upgraded my ports, using the procedure I've > been using for quite some time. After it was done, most of my Mozilla > plug-ins no longer work. I did not upgrade my operating system at that > time, since I'm already at the latest patchlevel. > > The specific issues are with acroread7, flash and mplayer-plugin. All of > these worked as plug-ins before the upgrade, but now none of them do. > Acroread7 and mplayer work fine in their standalone application > incarnations, but not as plug-ins. Curiously, the java plug-in still > works fine. In Mozilla, about:plugins shows java and the mplayer stuff, > but not anything pertaining to Acrobat or PDFs. > > Here is what I've done to try to fix this: > > tripel# mv /etc/libmap.conf /etc/libmap.conf.old > tripel# cp > /usr/local/share/examples/linuxpluginwrapper/libmap.conf-FreeBSD5-stable > /etc/libmap.conf > > /etc/libmap.conf - both the new and old versions - have an entry like > # Acrobat7 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror/Kazehakase > [/usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so] > libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/acrobat.so > > libc.so.6 exists; it's a symlink to libc-2.3.2.so, both in > /usr/compat/linux/lib. However, the path shown in [square brackets] does > not exist. Does it need to? man libc.conf doesn't say anything about > those square bracket entries. On the off chance, I tried creating that > heirarchy of directories and touch'ing nppdf.so, but no love so I got > rid of it. > > $ ls /usr/local/lib/pluginwrapper > acrobat.so flash7.so java3d.so oci8.so realplayer.so > flash6.so jai.so java3d_snd.so pips.so > > A search of the list archive turned up a post saying that you have to > have linprocfs mounted *before* doing the *install* on > linuxpluginwrapper. I made that happen; relevant df output is > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > linprocfs 4 4 0 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc > > I then deinstalled the following via 'make deinstall', then did 'make > reinstall' in this order: > print/acroread7 > www/mozilla > www/linuxpluginwrapper > www/linux-flashplugin > www/mplayer-plugin > > Question: Can someone point me to a writeup of what I need to do, in > what order, to repair this? > > Thanks very much. > > $ uname -a > FreeBSD tripel.monochrome.org 5.4-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8 #0: > Thu Oct 13 22:12:04 EDT 2005 > chris@tripel.monochrome.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TRIPEL i386 > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] Search the list archives for "Flash Plugin in 6.0" and "Flash no longer displayed in Firefox". It's an issue with the linuxpluginwrapper port, several methods to make it work are described in those recent threads. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 04:33:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D3316A422 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:33:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E7643D5D for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:33:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from alpha.home (ppp132-213.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net [59.167.132.213]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jBU4XeDP051094; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:03:41 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:03:35 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20051027113903.4ff19458.bhepple@freeshell.org> <20051029045346.0d82cde3.bhepple@freeshell.org> In-Reply-To: <20051029045346.0d82cde3.bhepple@freeshell.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512301503.35221.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: Bob Hepple Subject: Re: ext2fs and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:33:47 -0000 On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:23 am, Bob Hepple wrote: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:39:03 +1000 > > Bob Hepple wrote: > > I need to export an ext2fs file system mounted at /mnt/guest > > - it's a removable IDE disc that I carry to & from my linux > > system at work... > > > > "mount" shows: > > > > /dev/ad2s1 on /mnt/guest (ext2fs, local) > > > > So, I put an entry into /etc/exports: > > > > /mnt/guest -alldirs -network 192.168.254.0 -mask > > 255.255.255.0 > > > > and then: > > > > kill -s HUP `cat /var/run/mountd.pid` > > > > "showmount localhost" shows nothing and in /var/log/messages > > I have: > > > > Oct 27 11:36:01 raita kernel: ext2fs doesn't support the old > > mount syscall Oct 27 11:36:01 raita mountd[417]: can't > > export /mnt/guest Oct 27 11:36:01 raita mountd[417]: bad > > exports list line /mnt/guest -network 192.168.254.0 -mask > > 255.255.255.0 > > > > ... so there's really no way to NFS export an ext2fs file > > system??? > > Hmmm - looks like no-one has good news for me on this front so > I'll try a different approach: > > Can anyone suggest a UNIX filesystem for a removable IDE disc > that can be used on linux and freebsd and that can be exported > by NFS? > I thought most linux systems could mount 'ufs' file systems; perhaps not 'ufs2' so you might need to be specific in creating the file system. Malcolm Kay > > Thanks > > Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 04:44:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A089F16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:44:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from palm_7777@yahoo.ca) Received: from web36107.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web36107.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.221]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2690443D5C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:44:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from palm_7777@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 27252 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Dec 2005 04:44:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=fez1ZShHpB2jc0DO0ATIE7uYUhZDrGrM/xvOhgpLLj0DWmasYlC/Pit24h0eKs0rbcpJ1sQ2oXjOsicuTxwwZTa58oOh2ujtx2Qo5D5lypiosXTFhqJPWy15vVa5X/KylJLxViTwqV/qLXP3LgQkCSrl6Iiv8GcvkR3u7sBG+hk= ; Message-ID: <20051230044420.27250.qmail@web36107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.222.91.86] by web36107.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:44:20 EST Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:44:20 -0500 (EST) From: Jon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051229212600.D48FF16A420@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Hardware graphics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:44:21 -0000 Hi, I need some help getting hardware graphics going. I built radeon.ko and drm.ko from drm cvs and loaded them, a quick dmesg drm says the modules are loaded. (drm 1.21.0 20051229) I was told on here I would need the r300 DRI module for my ATI Radeon 9800 Pro which I got from the FreeBSD Ports 'dri-6.2.20050719,1', that built and installed r300_dri.so. I'm using radeon_drv.o in my Xorg.conf file as the display driver, I had a look at my Xorg.conf Log file and it says: (WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering not yet supported on Radeon 9500 and newer (II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration unsupported on Radeon 9500/9700 and newer. (II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration disabled What else could be the problem? -- Thanks FreeBSD 6.0 STABLE __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 05:47:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B871A16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 05:47:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DEB43D49 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 05:47:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E29662C895 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:47:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87028-04 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:47:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C69962C879 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:47:48 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8E11639A15; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:47:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A58F38DEA for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:47:46 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:47:46 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051230014445.X1087@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: How much memory is a jail using ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 05:47:49 -0000 Is there an easy way to do this? I know I can find out what processes are running in a jail by looking at /proc/*/status ,but none of the fields appear to relate to memory used by that process ... so, I'm guessing I should be able to 'read' one of the other fiels in the procfs directory for this? Thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 05:51:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC72616A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 05:51:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (fed1rmmtao05.cox.net [68.230.241.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9436343D46 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 05:51:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from workdog ([68.228.71.3]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051230054921.KMWR17838.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@workdog>; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:49:21 -0500 From: "Gayn Winters" To: "'rocky'" , Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:51:02 -0800 Organization: Bristol Systems Inc. Message-ID: <015001c60d05$075e3590$6501a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 In-Reply-To: <00c301c60cdf$26a02e70$4d02a8c0@HKGKWNT001> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: Subject: RE: SATA 80G HDD can't detect X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 05:51:04 -0000 > On Behalf Of rocky > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 5:20 PM > Subject: SATA 80G HDD can't detect > > Dear all, > > I got the Dell PE850 server, which is running SATA with 80G > HDD, but I try to boot it up and install the FreeBSD6.0, > > it can detect the Disk Controller but any HDD. > > In the boot up screen, it show me the chipset is ICH7. > > Please help. The ata driver in 6.0 supports ICH7 (man ata). First, double check the fundamentals: cables, power, BIOS, and the daughter card connector. Try the other SATA connector on the MB's daughter card. Does the BIOS see and correctly identify the HDD? Is it set to boot from a SATA or a SCSI drive? Second, run the system diagnostics that came with the PE850. (They take a long time to run.) What do the disk diagnostics say? [Hopefully, since FBSD can't see the HDD, you haven't blown away the utility partition on your HDD. If you have, then you'll have to download them, repartition the HDD and reinstall them.) Cf. http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/pe850/en/it/t8652c30.htm#w p1053632 Third, run the disk manufacturer's diagnostics. Hopefully, all hardware checks ok including the HDD, and the BIOS can boot the system utilities (which in particular means it can read/write the HDD.) I'm assuming you can boot FBSD's first installation disk. You'll need to post the dmesg from that. Also tell us precisely what the "fdisk section" says. Good luck! -gayn Bristol Systems Inc. 714/532-6776 www.bristolsystems.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 06:03:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B77916A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rocky@pokpok.com) Received: from awacs.takachiho.com.hk (siteangel-hk.bmc.com [202.153.119.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8896C43D46 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:03:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rocky@pokpok.com) Received: from HKGKWNT001 ([202.82.51.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by awacs.takachiho.com.hk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBU63bGi032729; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:03:38 +0800 (HKT) (envelope-from rocky@pokpok.com) Message-ID: <018e01c60d06$c705aa80$4d02a8c0@HKGKWNT001> From: "rocky" To: , References: <015001c60d05$075e3590$6501a8c0@workdog> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:03:37 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-awacs-MailScanner-Information: Antivirus/AntiSpam by AWACS.Takachiho X-awacs-MailScanner: Mail is disinfected, check my ClamAV X-awacs-MailScanner-From: rocky@pokpok.com Cc: Subject: Re: SATA 80G HDD can't detect X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rocky List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:03:49 -0000 Dear Gayn, In fact, I try to install Linux FC4 and that is successful. I try to get the dmeg and will mail to you again. So, what I am thinking is Dell made something and which FreeBSD can't install..... Regards, Rocky ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gayn Winters" To: "'rocky'" ; Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 1:51 PM Subject: RE: SATA 80G HDD can't detect > > On Behalf Of rocky > > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 5:20 PM > > Subject: SATA 80G HDD can't detect > > > > Dear all, > > > > I got the Dell PE850 server, which is running SATA with 80G > > HDD, but I try to boot it up and install the FreeBSD6.0, > > > > it can detect the Disk Controller but any HDD. > > > > In the boot up screen, it show me the chipset is ICH7. > > > > Please help. > > The ata driver in 6.0 supports ICH7 (man ata). > > First, double check the fundamentals: cables, power, BIOS, and the > daughter card connector. Try the other SATA connector on the MB's > daughter card. Does the BIOS see and correctly identify the HDD? Is it > set to boot from a SATA or a SCSI drive? > > Second, run the system diagnostics that came with the PE850. (They take > a long time to run.) What do the disk diagnostics say? [Hopefully, > since FBSD can't see the HDD, you haven't blown away the utility > partition on your HDD. If you have, then you'll have to download them, > repartition the HDD and reinstall them.) Cf. > http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/pe850/en/it/t8652c30.htm#w > p1053632 > > Third, run the disk manufacturer's diagnostics. > > Hopefully, all hardware checks ok including the HDD, and the BIOS can > boot the system utilities (which in particular means it can read/write > the HDD.) I'm assuming you can boot FBSD's first installation disk. > You'll need to post the dmesg from that. Also tell us precisely what > the "fdisk section" says. > > Good luck! > > -gayn > > Bristol Systems Inc. > 714/532-6776 > www.bristolsystems.com > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 06:21:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC03C16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:21:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgoldberg@tarshis.com) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBD643D4C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:21:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgoldberg@tarshis.com) Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (pimout3-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.218]) by ylpvm29.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBU6LWri007506 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:21:32 -0500 X-ORBL: [68.255.104.231] Received: from storyopom7s0ow (adsl-68-255-104-231.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.255.104.231]) by pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBU6LPqR020774 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:21:30 -0500 From: "Daniel Goldberg" To: Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:20:15 -0600 Message-ID: <000001c60d09$1c0cde70$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: booting off 6.0 cdrom for Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:21:33 -0000 Dear FreeBSD forum, Please forgive this question if it seems so elementary. I am a newbie and have googled the matter, searched the FreeBSD.org mailing list archives and read the Handbook and still am in the dark. ISSUE: Trying to install FreeBSD 6.0 from cdrom on my PIII laptop and not reaching an "install" menu. BACKGROUND: I have created a "FreeBSD_Install" cdrom from the 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso download. When I boot from the cd I reach a 6-option Boot menu but do not get to the Install menu described in 2.3.1 of the Handbook. Note: If I do try to boot, the boot process itself seems to fail with a "Cannot dump: no dump device defined" following a "Fatal trap 12 page fault while in kernel mode"- in case that illustrates anything, and that's boot attempts with or without APCI. MY SYSTEM: PIII Laptop with recent rev BIOS & 512MB ram Internal hard drive with 3 partitions: 1 Primary NTFS (30GB with XP) 2 Primary FAT32 (6GB for FreeBSD) 3 Primary FAT32 (800MB for swapping between XP & FreeBSD) * The pc definitely allows me to boot from a cd * The MD5 hash on my download matches the published hash * Yes, I am going nuts- being so eager to get this OS up and dig into it! So the basic question is: Is the install process supposed to be as simple as: A create a primary FAT32 partition B boot your machine from the FreeBSD_Install (DISK 1) cd C follow the prompts through the install process Your advice is most appreciated, Daniel Goldberg IT | Post-Production Systems Engineer Avid ACSR (Unity/Windows) Apple ACHDS Microsoft MCP Cisco CCNA email Dgoldberg@Tarshis.com mobile 847.400.7949 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 08:25:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F14A16A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261C743D4C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:25:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA05791; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:23:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma005785; Fri, 30 Dec 05 09:23:39 +0100 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (rebelion.Sisis.de [193.31.10.34]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA28678; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:25:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBU8Po40005022; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:25:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:25:50 +0100 To: Greg Barniskis Message-ID: <20051230082550.GA4596@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> <43B4194E.9020203@scls.lib.wi.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <43B4194E.9020203@scls.lib.wi.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (i386) Cc: Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:25:47 -0000 El día Thursday, December 29, 2005 a las 11:13:50AM -0600, Greg Barniskis escribió: ... > > > >My point was that I don't have a fast Internet link at home to fetch all > >the (new) sources for the distfiles and I was looking for distfiles on > >CD which match exactly the 6.0-REL ports collection requirements; > ... > > Anyway, do you think you could download an ISO of the sources all > that much faster than just downloading the sources directly from > their respective repositories around the world as is normally done? > OK, maybe a little bit faster, but not that much. Now you're close to my point :-) In the company, where I'm at the moment, I've an uplink to Internet of 2 mb, at home I've 64 kbit; so my idea was to fetch, lets say 4 CD at high speed, burn them and use them at home for the needed disfiles; it seems that this would be a good idea to place somewhere a start collection of the disfiles matching exactly the versions which will be fetched by the ports, at least for the the most common parts of the ports collection, don't you think so? some wweks ago I was in Havana giving talks about FreeBSD and after that I let my 5.4-REL disfiles there in some central servers so that the folks can setup a 5.4-REL desktop system with KDE and so on, and without needing access to Internet... Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH ein Tochterunternehmen der OCLC PICA B.V. Leiden (NL) D-82041 Oberhaching, Gruenwalder Weg 28g Fon: +49 89 / 61308-351, Fax: -399, Mobile +49 170 4527211 http://www.sisis.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 10:39:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F7A16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:39:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6271743D48 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:39:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09101 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:37:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma009094; Fri, 30 Dec 05 11:37:31 +0100 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (rebelion.Sisis.de [193.31.10.34]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA00188 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:39:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBUAdgYX011180 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:39:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:39:42 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051230103942.GB9413@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (i386) Subject: 6.0-REL && ports/devel/subversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:39:54 -0000 Hi, the ports compilation of subversion-1.2.1 failes with: subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:32:23: ne_socket.h: No such file or directory subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:33:24: ne_request.h: No such file or directory subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:34:22: ne_props.h: No such file or directory subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:35:22: ne_basic.h: No such file or directory it seems that the missing header files are part of ports/www/neon/ but don't get installed; what is the right way to fix this? Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH ein Tochterunternehmen der OCLC PICA B.V. Leiden (NL) D-82041 Oberhaching, Gruenwalder Weg 28g Fon: +49 89 / 61308-351, Fax: -399, Mobile +49 170 4527211 http://www.sisis.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 11:06:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DC116A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:06:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE39B43D48 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:06:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBUB9iP99154; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:09:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Chris S. Wilson" , "Greg Barniskis" Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:06:21 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: RE: NATD Internal Network problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:06:32 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Chris S. Wilson >Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 3:08 PM >To: Greg Barniskis >Cc: freebsd-questions >Subject: RE: NATD Internal Network problems > > >Weird, every other router I've used forwards all the packets properly, >even my backup linksys when I hook it up. > Those aren't forwarding the packets properly. The CPU in your Linksys isn't capabable of routing 100Mbt of traffic from an inside host to your linksys then back to the inside host. Try it some time and see for yourself. - copy a large file around or some such. While it's happening your Internet access will roll over and die. What the commercial routers like a Cisco can do is DNS translation, assuming the DNS server is on the outside. The DNS server responds with the outside IP address and the translator in the Cisco converts it to the inside private number. So the hosts on the inside can use a regular hostname that would normally resolve to the outside of the translator, and they get the inside number and nobody knows the difference. Some other translators pull this trick by having the DNS server set to the IP address of the translator, and they proxy all the DNS queries. There's a good chance that a large number of these "every other router I've used" routers you have used are in fact doing this, and you just didn't even notice. It is actually extremely easy to do the same thing on a FreeBSD box running as a translator. Just turn on named, and setup the named file for the domain used on your inside net, and forward all other queries to the real DNS servers on the outside. Then set the inside hosts to use the FreeBSD box as their DNS server. This is exactly how Linksys does it. If you need instructions just ask, they are very easy. Ted >Really I don't want to do the split dns stuff, sadly I will have to move >away from FreeBSD for performing this operation I guess. > >Thanks for the help! > >CW. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Greg Barniskis [mailto:nalists@scls.lib.wi.us] >Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 3:05 PM >To: Chris S. Wilson >Cc: freebsd-questions >Subject: Re: NATD Internal Network problems > >Chris S. Wilson wrote: >> Hello! :) >> >> I am having a problem with freebsd 5.3-release and natd. >> >> When I try to connect to a service on my internal network to an IP on >> my external network that has a port redirected, it wont connect. >> >> IE: 67.128.100.2 is my external IP, on my internal network I try to >> connect to 67.128.101.2:80 which is forwarded in my natd.conf and the >> connection is refused. >> >> Does anyone know why? > >I don't know the exact technical reasons "why" but I will confirm for >you that this simply does not work, and the reasons why center around it >being a rather tortured mess. > >Your inside machines should reach your inside server by its inside >address. Think about how you're sending your request outside the >firewall (getting the request NATed on the way out) and then back in >(getting the request re-NATed), and then having the reply packets from >the web server have to take the reverse of that path. Yuck. > >Use split DNS so that that "www.example.com" appears to external clients >as being your external NAT server address, and appears to inside clients >as the web server's real inside address. > > >-- >Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System >(SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , >(608) 266-6348 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: >12/29/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 11:10:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0176A16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:10:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1441143D4C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:10:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2005 11:10:10 -0000 Received: from p54AD940B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO www2.gmx.net) [84.173.148.11] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 30 Dec 2005 12:10:10 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14602519 Received: from oak.pohoyda.family (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.gmx.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBUBA8UX000383 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:10:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from apog@oak.pohoyda.family) Received: (from apog@localhost) by oak.pohoyda.family (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id jBUBA7d7000380; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:10:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from apog) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:10:07 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200512301110.jBUBA7d7000380@oak.pohoyda.family> From: Alexander Pohoyda To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Recursive FTP upload tool? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:10:13 -0000 Hi folks, I'm looking for a command-line tool to recursively upload all changed files/directories to my homepage server via FTP. Is there anything better than wput for this task? -- Alexander Pohoyda PGP Key fingerprint: 7F C9 CC 5A 75 CD 89 72 15 54 5F 62 20 23 C6 44 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 12:12:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D044916A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:12:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5232A43D45 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:12:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF5BD2E81C; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 07:12:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from web1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.210]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 07:12:33 -0500 Received: by web1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id D1C23C168; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 07:12:33 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1135944753.3130.250777462@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: mFqPSCq5sc7tCbFLSfDdKCLYnyoYxzgl6gPdih6e6YRa 1135944753 From: "Jud" To: "Daniel Goldberg" , "freebsd-questions" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.5 (F2.73; T1.15; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) References: <000001c60d09$1c0cde70$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> In-Reply-To: <000001c60d09$1c0cde70$c5ddfea9@storyopom7s0ow> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 07:12:33 -0500 Cc: Subject: Re: booting off 6.0 cdrom for Install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:12:34 -0000 On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:20:15 -0600, "Daniel Goldberg" said: > I have created a "FreeBSD_Install" cdrom from the > 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso download. > When I boot from the cd I reach a 6-option Boot menu but do not get to > the Install menu described in 2.3.1 of the Handbook. > > Note: If I do try to boot, the boot process itself seems to fail with a > "Cannot dump: no dump device defined" following a "Fatal trap 12 page > fault while in kernel mode"- in case that illustrates anything, and > that's boot attempts with or without APCI. A dump device is a place to put information about problems so that you can debug them. It's not what's preventing you from getting to the Install menu. The kernel panic - "Fatal trap 12 page fault while in kernel mode" - is what's doing that. Re kernel panic, see generally . I don't have the technical proficiency to help you further re the panic - hopefully someone else on the list might be able to do that. I'll try to suggest some possible workarounds, though: 1) See if the most recent -STABLE snapshot (obtained via FTP, probably the same place you downloaded the 6.0-RELEASE iso from) likes your laptop better than the release iso. 2) Check system hardware, particularly memory, for trouble. > So the basic question is: > Is the install process supposed to be as simple as: > A create a primary FAT32 partition > B boot your machine from the FreeBSD_Install (DISK 1) cd > C follow the prompts through the install process Simpler than that, actually. The availability of disk space that can be made a primary partition is necessary, but FAT32 isn't. Sorry I couldn't be more helpful. Hope you get there. Jud From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 13:03:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C0A16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: from mail.cruzinternet.com (mail.cruzinternet.com [216.234.167.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715FC43D58 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:03:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: (qmail 48212 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 06:03:33 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (216.234.182.9) by mail.cruzinternet.com with SMTP; 30 Dec 2005 06:03:33 -0700 Message-ID: <43B5302F.3020403@cruzinternet.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:03:43 -0700 From: Jeff Molofee User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051230120039.EB0C016A47C@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20051230120039.EB0C016A47C@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Latest Nvidia Driver... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:03:35 -0000 Has anyone else noticed flickering along the edges of a video when playing high resolution video in mplayer using -vo xv? After upgrading to the latest driver, I have noticed that the edges of any video I play that is higher resolution than my monitor supports waves, flickers, etc. This happens in fullscreen (scaled to fit the monitor) and in windowed mode... ONLY if the video is off the left or top half of the screen. If I move the top left corner of mplayer completely onto the screen, the video is perfect, even though the bottom and right half are off the screen. Playing with -vo x11, gl or gl2 works fine, but is slower. Would love some feedback if anyone knows what the problem is. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 13:36:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A5016A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:36:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lk@tempest.sk) Received: from mailgw.dgrp.sk (mailgw.dgrp.sk [195.28.127.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2137F43D48 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:36:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lk@tempest.sk) Received: by mailgw.dgrp.sk (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 7B91434A5A4; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:36:15 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on mailgw.dgrp.sk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from webmail.tempest.sk (domino1.tempest.sk [195.28.100.38]) by mailgw.dgrp.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E47934A5A3; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:36:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from lk.tempest.sk ([195.28.109.47]) by webmail.tempest.sk (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.4) with ESMTP id 2005123014361119-10390 ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:36:11 +0100 Received: from lk.tempest.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lk.tempest.sk (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBUDa6HZ084435; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:36:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from koren@lk.tempest.sk) Received: (from koren@localhost) by lk.tempest.sk (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jBUDa6EQ084432; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:36:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from koren) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:36:06 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200512301336.jBUDa6EQ084432@lk.tempest.sk> From: Ludo Koren To: freebsd-questions@amadeus.demon.nl In-reply-to: <8443CD6F-E959-4738-9CBF-49942B26F777@amadeus.demon.nl> (message from freebsd-questions on Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:30:56 +0100) References: <87acey71y7.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> <87hd8z6gbx.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> <8443CD6F-E959-4738-9CBF-49942B26F777@amadeus.demon.nl> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Domino1/DGRP(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 30.12.2005 14:36:11, Serialize by Router on Domino1/DGRP(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 30.12.2005 14:36:12, Serialize complete at 30.12.2005 14:36:12 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum: adding plex and subdisks to existing volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:36:18 -0000 > On 23 dec 2005, at 15:25, Ludo Koren wrote: >>>>>>> Arno Beekman writes: >> >>> On 18 dec 2005, at 18:24, Ludo Koren wrote: >> >>>> Any help appreciated, I cannot find useful hints. >>>> >> >>> http://www.vinumvm.org/ http://www.freebsddiary.org/vinum.php >>> man 4 vinum man 8 vinum >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/vinum- >>> vinum.html http://devel.reinikainen.net/docs/how-to/Vinum/ >> maybe I was not enough specific. There is not enough >> information about gvinum in the case. All you've mentioned is >> about vinum and there are some diffrences; not all commands are >> implemented... BTW, the addition of disk on 5.4-STABLE is >> causing panic. I posted the problem to the >> freebsd-geom@freebsd.org. >> >> Regards, >> >> lk >> > hi Ludo, > gvinum = vinum anything you need to do to add a new drive which > is written on those sites can be done for gvinum as well... at > least that's my experience http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/GvinumManPage specifically BUGS: gvinum(8) does not yet fully implement all functions found in vinum(4). Specifically, the following commands from vinum(4) are not supported: ... > if you follow the descriptions of replacing a disk and get > panics there might be something else that's wrong lk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 13:54:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938F116A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:54:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBD543D5E for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:54:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBUDsYR4001256; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 07:54:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43B53C1A.2020809@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 07:54:34 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: guru@Sisis.de References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> <43B4194E.9020203@scls.lib.wi.us> <20051230082550.GA4596@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20051230082550.GA4596@rebelion.Sisis.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:54:36 -0000 guru@Sisis.de wrote: > El día Thursday, December 29, 2005 a las 11:13:50AM -0600, Greg Barniskis escribió: > > ... > >>>My point was that I don't have a fast Internet link at home to fetch all >>>the (new) sources for the distfiles and I was looking for distfiles on >>>CD which match exactly the 6.0-REL ports collection requirements; >> > ... > >>Anyway, do you think you could download an ISO of the sources all >>that much faster than just downloading the sources directly from >>their respective repositories around the world as is normally done? >>OK, maybe a little bit faster, but not that much. > > > Now you're close to my point :-) > > In the company, where I'm at the moment, I've an uplink to Internet > of 2 mb, at home I've 64 kbit; so my idea was to fetch, lets say > 4 CD at high speed, burn them and use them at home for the needed > disfiles; it seems that this would be a good idea to place somewhere > a start collection of the disfiles matching exactly the versions > which will be fetched by the ports, at least for the the most common > parts of the ports collection, don't you think so? No, I don't. It's one thing for the individual port maintainers to try to keep pace with updating the ports Makefiles telling you where you can download each distfile from, and quite another to try to create a central repository for these distfiles. Would you like to volunteer to host it and keep it current? ;) Also, the "most common parts of the ports collection" are on the distribution ISOs as packages. Again, if you simply must have sources not packages, then at your high speed location, do something like: portupgrade -F '*' Then burn your own ISOs any which way you like. Try to be more specific about what you want than '*' or you may be sorry due to the sheer volume -- do you really want all of the sources for nearly 14,000 ports? Or perhaps this is what you want? http://www.freebsdmall.com/cgi-bin/fm/bsdtool?id=yvFGn3kw&mv_pc=26 -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 14:20:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E380416A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:20:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5687543D5A for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:20:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EsL7M-0005mm-9u for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:20:28 +0100 Received: from antik2-ke-13.antik.sk ([87.244.193.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:20:28 +0100 Received: from martinkov by antik2-ke-13.antik.sk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:20:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:10:44 +0100 Lines: 26 Message-ID: <43B53FE4.2050503@pobox.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: antik2-ke-13.antik.sk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051205 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en Sender: news Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: NX client & server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:20:32 -0000 hello, i've installed net/linux-nx-client and net/freenx ports. first i tried to connect to NoMachine's testdrive server but the client crashed with signal 11 somewhere in the middle of the connecting process. then i tried `nxclient --admin` which hanged my whole X11 or window manager (window maker). i had to switch to the console and kill them. for both above i followed http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8538 . next, i installed freenx server but don't know what to do next. i've come across many documents on the net, but all of them are related to different linux distros and they differ substantially. also, i noticed there hasn't been nx user created and the scripts installed contain wrong paths (ie original paths, not the ones used on freebsd). i'm a bit perplexed now. what is the state/status of these ports and is there any howto on freebsd installation please ?? with regards, martin ps: this is freebsd 6-stable and recent ports tree. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 14:24:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CD616A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:24:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA8A43D73 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:24:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EsLBK-0006Vz-J6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:24:34 +0100 Received: from blueice3n1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.179]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:24:34 +0100 Received: from element by blueice3n1.de.ibm.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:24:34 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Pavel Duda Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:24:22 +0100 Lines: 28 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: blueice3n1.de.ibm.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Sender: news Subject: IPFW traffic shaping questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:24:56 -0000 Hello, I have few questions for ipfw gurus.. 1) can I see what packets are matching my pipes/queues ? I'm using "ipfw pipe show" for example but there is always only one host so if I'm testing some rules I can't tell if they work or not (maybe there is some other way how to "trace" such things ?) 2) how to correctly setup ul/dl limits for clients ? I have 4096/256 line and I want primarily control upload because when someone starts uploading too much line become unusable for low latency apps (games, ip phone, audio broadcasting). I have created queues to limit upload, but then also download was affected and slowdown was very big. I have tried to add rule for ACK packets - no effect (I'm not network guru maybe this is not enough for speeding up download). Now I'm thinking that maybe I have wrong rules because as I remember pipes and queues are managed diferently then other ipfw rules and even when I put unlimited pipe for "ACK out" it is then limited by second rule for "all out" - pipes/queues are not "first match wins" right ? 3) this is similar to 1) - is there some tool for monitoring how packet "flows" through rules ? And I don't mean using "ipfw log" :-) ... Any advice or web tutorial for network-lama (ie. me :-) ) appreciated. Thanks & Happy New Year Pavel D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 14:49:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0711A16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6787843D67 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:49:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 1292 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 14:49:12 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Dec 2005 14:49:11 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CA9B928423; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:49:10 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Paul Marciano References: <20051228194721.83672.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 30 Dec 2005 09:49:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051228194721.83672.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44bqyyk5cp.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 41 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I get gdbserver for FreeBSD 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:49:13 -0000 Paul Marciano writes: > I am using FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE and would like to use > gdbserver, but I can't find it. > > The source tree has gdbserver in two places: > > /usr/src/contrib/gdb/gdb/gdbserver > and > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdbserver The sources are actually in the second; the first is just build infrastructure. Note that they're not hooked up to the master build; David O'Brien removed them from the makefiles in 2002, apparently as part of bringing in the Gnu binutils 2.12. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/Makefile > There's also a gdb6 in /usr/ports/devel. Yes, but that doesn't include gdbserver either. > > The installed gdb says its version 6.1.1, and it looks > like the /usr/src/contrib/gdb tree is also 6.1.1, but > there's no configure script or Makefile. Is this tree > a patch for the usr/ports/devel/gdb6? No. It's the sources for gdbserver, but not ported to build on FreeBSD. > I'm a bit lost right now. I hope someone can help me > find my way. gdbserver isn't currently ported for FreeBSD. If you really need it (as opposed to some other form of remote debugging), you could probably best get started by asking obrien for hints. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 14:58:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1252C16A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:58:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jan.zach@unient.cz) Received: from wia-smtp.multimedia.cz (wia-smtp.multimedia.cz [80.250.3.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328D343D76 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:58:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jan.zach@unient.cz) Received: (qmail 17451 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 15:58:06 +0100 Received: from owa.unient.cz (HELO mejlon.unient.cz) (217.169.180.69) by wia-smtp.multimedia.cz with SMTP; 30 Dec 2005 15:58:06 +0100 Received: from [10.10.100.120] ([10.10.100.120]) by mejlon.unient.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:58:16 +0100 Message-ID: <43B54AFD.4090100@unient.cz> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:58:05 +0100 From: Jan ZACH Organization: Unient Communications, a.s. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051118) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Dec 2005 14:58:16.0916 (UTC) FILETIME=[77267940:01C60D51] Subject: qemu and bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:58:15 -0000 Hi, I'm configuring qemu. Everything works fine except networking between the bsd host and the qemu computer (I cannot ping from bsd to qemu and vice versa). Networking with other computers works fine. Am I missing anything in my configuration? Thanks a lot Jan bge0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 options=1a inet 10.10.100.120 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.10.100.255 ether 00:0f:1f:b9:ff:fb media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 tap0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 ether 00:bd:98:a7:01:00 Opened by PID 849 Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 10.10.100.1 UGS 0 14167 bge0 10.10.100/24 link#1 UC 0 0 bge0 10.10.100.1 00:50:7f:25:2d:e0 UHLW 2 0 bge0 1183 10.10.100.122 52:54:00:12:34:56 UHLW 1 1 bge0 1195 <------- qemu computer localhost localhost UH 0 495 lo0 kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 4 1 0xc07c3000 4188 if_tap.ko 16 1 0xc0821000 be20 kqemu.ko 17 1 0xc082d000 9150 bridge.ko 21 1 0xc1e44000 d000 ipfw.ko net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: bge0,tap0 net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw: 0 net.link.ether.bridge_ipf: 0 net.link.ether.bridge.config: bge0,tap0 net.link.ether.bridge.enable: 1 net.link.ether.bridge.predict: 0 net.link.ether.bridge.dropped: 0 net.link.ether.bridge.packets: 11863 net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw_collisions: 0 net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw_drop: 0 net.link.ether.bridge.copy: 0 net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw: 0 net.link.ether.bridge.ipf: 0 net.link.ether.bridge.debug: 0 net.link.ether.bridge.version: 031224 net.link.gif.parallel_tunnels: 0 net.link.gif.max_nesting: 1 net.link.log_link_state_change: 1 net.link.tap.debug: 0 net.link.tap.user_open: 1 qemu option to run net: -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0 qeumu computer is running winxp with dhcp enabled From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 15:11:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566F316A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:11:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5888B43D55 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:11:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 32111 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 15:11:16 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Dec 2005 15:11:16 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 943A528423; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:11:15 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Leslie Jensen References: <43B37723.6010207@eskk.nu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 30 Dec 2005 10:11:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43B37723.6010207@eskk.nu> Message-ID: <447j9mk4bw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 66 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installation of linux_base on 6.0-RELEASE-p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:11:42 -0000 Leslie Jensen writes: > I've installed the linux_base but later found out that I needed the > linux_base-8. I did a make deinstall for the linux_base and then I > tried to install the linux_base-8. > > cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8 > > make install clean > > ===> Installing for linux_base-8-8.0_10 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if emulators/linux_base-8 already installed > kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3 > redhat-release-8.0-8.noarch.rpm > glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm > glibc-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm > setup-2.5.20-1.noarch.rpm > filesystem-2.1.6-5.noarch.rpm > basesystem-8.0-1.noarch.rpm > libattr-2.0.8-3.i386.rpm > libacl-2.0.11-2.i386.rpm > libelf-0.8.2-2.i386.rpm > bzip2-libs-1.0.2-5.i386.rpm > termcap-11.0.1-13.noarch.rpm > compat-db-3.3.11-2.i386.rpm > db4-4.0.14-14.i386.rpm > gdbm-1.8.0-18.i386.rpm > glib-1.2.10-8.i386.rpm > libtermcap-2.0.8-31.i386.rpm > bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm > bzip2-1.0.2-5.i386.rpm > compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110.i386.rpm > > file /usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so from install of > compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110 conflicts with file from package > libstdc++-2.96-110 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8. > > > I need to solve the conflict with libstdc but I can't find information > on how. > > I would appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction. That's a confusing error message, all right. Or maybe I just need more coffee... Okay, it looks like RPMs for compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110 and libstdc++-2.96-110 are banging into each other. The latter is probably from linux_base and the former from linux_base-8. At a guess, removing the linux_base port didn't go well. Maybe removing the linux packages (use pkg_delete(1) rather than "make deinstall", as it will not be confused if you update your ports skeletons) and cleaning /usr/compat out thoroughly is the way to go. That would take a lot of time, though; first try figuring out whether any port actually owns the conflicting file, and if not, remove that by hand. Good luck. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 15:22:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4426316A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:22:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A638243D4C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:22:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 31340 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 15:22:23 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Dec 2005 15:22:23 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8AD7C28423; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:22:22 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Mihai Tanasescu References: <43B3AAD2.4030703@duras.ro> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 30 Dec 2005 10:22:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43B3AAD2.4030703@duras.ro> Message-ID: <443bkak3td.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 44 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Systat -ip 1 strange problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:22:24 -0000 Mihai Tanasescu writes: > Don't know if this is the right list to post this problem, but I hope > I'm not too far off: If you're not sure, then this is the right list. > I have a Compaq Proliant ML 350 machine with 3 x fxp and 2 x em > network cards. > > If I issue : > > systat -ip 1 I see: > > 866056packets forwarded 0 - no checksum > > the same for systat -ip 2. > > For systat -ip 3 (and higher): > > 83537 packets forwarded 0 - no checksum - these > are the correct figures > > > I really don't have the figures reported for refresh-interval = 1 or > 2 and have just installed Freebsd 5.4 on it. (The same problem > manifests with Freebsd 6.0 on that box). > > A friend of mine has a similar setup (but not a Compaq box) and > doesn't see strange values for -ip 1 and -ip 2. > > > > Any clue on what's happening or what's causing this ? I'm not quite sure what you're saying here. Are you saying that if you use a refresh interval of 1, it tells you you're getting over 800,000 packets forwarded per second, but with a longer refresh interval, it gives you values of around 35,000 packets per second? And that you know from some other method that the latter is correct? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 15:28:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FDF16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:28:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F1243D45 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:28:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 13745 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 15:28:02 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Dec 2005 15:28:02 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9337B28423; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:28:01 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051228081309.I95953@seibercom.net> <44u0csq6ib.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20051229160037.E5E3.GERARD@seibercom.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 30 Dec 2005 10:28:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051229160037.E5E3.GERARD@seibercom.net> Message-ID: <44wthmiozi.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 37 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Unable to install Webmin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:28:03 -0000 Gerard Seibert writes: > On Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:15:24 AM > Lowell Gilbert > Subject: Re: Unable to install Webmin > Wrote these words of wisdom: > > > Hmm. I can't reproduce the problem. > > > > Did you install from the port? > > If so, did you set the rc.conf variable as instructed by the port? > > > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** > On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: > > Yes, I have the proper notation in rc.conf. The 'webmin' program is > causing a perl.core dump, and I cannot fathom why. I have deleted and > rebuilt everything, but still no success. > > I spoke to someone a day ago who said that they had webmin running fine > and then suddenly one day it started doing the same thing as mine. They > never got it to work either until they dumped the system and started > over. I am not about to go that route. > > I have no idea what to do with the perl.core file. Perhaps someone knows > how to debug this situation. Well, running it under a debugger would be the obvious way. truss(1) would be worth trying first. Since perl is otherwise working, you might try contacting the webmin port maintainer for advice. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 15:30:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CA516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:30:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from mail.duras.ro (mail.duras.ro [86.105.56.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1F743D53 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:30:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2277FC35 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:30:16 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.duras.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01842-05 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:30:15 +0200 (EET) Received: from [86.105.56.194] (ma.plimb.cu.barca.prin.padure.ro [86.105.56.194]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508EE7FED3 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:30:15 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <43B5521F.7020502@duras.ro> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:28:31 +0200 From: Mihai Tanasescu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43B3AAD2.4030703@duras.ro> <443bkak3td.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <443bkak3td.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (RedHat) at duras.ro Subject: Re: Systat -ip 1 strange problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:30:24 -0000 Well I wasn't very exact: I have something like this: ISP links ---> Freebsd Box -- gbit----- Cisco 3750 -- users. If I issue systat -ip 1 (immediately after a reboot on the Freebsd box) I see something like: 90.000 pkt/sec forwarded ( if I look on the C3750 interface statistics I see something similar ). If I wait 1-2-3 hours and issue systat -ip 1 I see 800-900.000 pkt/sec forwarded (but these stats don't correspond to what I'm seeing on the C3750). If I issue systat -ip 3 then I see 90-100.000 pkt/sec which is correct. Lowell Gilbert wrote: >Mihai Tanasescu writes: > > > >>Don't know if this is the right list to post this problem, but I hope >>I'm not too far off: >> >> > >If you're not sure, then this is the right list. > > > >>I have a Compaq Proliant ML 350 machine with 3 x fxp and 2 x em >>network cards. >> >>If I issue : >> >>systat -ip 1 I see: >> >> 866056packets forwarded 0 - no checksum >> >>the same for systat -ip 2. >> >>For systat -ip 3 (and higher): >> >> 83537 packets forwarded 0 - no checksum - these >>are the correct figures >> >> >>I really don't have the figures reported for refresh-interval = 1 or >>2 and have just installed Freebsd 5.4 on it. (The same problem >>manifests with Freebsd 6.0 on that box). >> >>A friend of mine has a similar setup (but not a Compaq box) and >>doesn't see strange values for -ip 1 and -ip 2. >> >> >> >>Any clue on what's happening or what's causing this ? >> >> > >I'm not quite sure what you're saying here. Are you saying that if >you use a refresh interval of 1, it tells you you're getting over >800,000 packets forwarded per second, but with a longer refresh >interval, it gives you values of around 35,000 packets per second? >And that you know from some other method that the latter is correct? > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 15:53:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D275716A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:53:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F9543D4C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:53:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBUFrbR4004371; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:53:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43B55801.3050106@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:53:37 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Pohoyda References: <200512301110.jBUBA7d7000380@oak.pohoyda.family> In-Reply-To: <200512301110.jBUBA7d7000380@oak.pohoyda.family> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursive FTP upload tool? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:53:39 -0000 Alexander Pohoyda wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm looking for a command-line tool to recursively upload all changed > files/directories to my homepage server via FTP. Is there anything > better than wput for this task? If your server supports it, of course rsync seems much better than FTP for this task. Have you seen this article on automating command line ftp? http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/excerpt/BSDHacks_chap1/index1.html It recommends ncftp client, but I don't know if it does what you want or not. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 16:12:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9EA16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0491843D49 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:12:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 7289 invoked by uid 89); 31 Dec 2005 03:12:51 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 6797, pid: 6808, t: 39.8144s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (213.202.167.185) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 03:12:11 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd From: eoghan Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:12:07 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: getting sound X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:12:52 -0000 Hello I have followed the manual page here for sound setup: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound- setup.html Im using freebsd 6.0 with generic kernel. Im not sure what sound card came with my dell (its 3 years old). So i did: #kldload snd_emu10k1 #kldload snd_driver then: #cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Installed devices: pcm0: at io 0xec40 irq 11 kld snd_es137x(1p/1r/0v channels duplex default) This is my first time trying to get the sound working. I try play an mp3 ans dont hear anything. Perhaps using the snd_driver wont work in my case... Is there a way to get freeBSD to show my sound device so I can load the correct module? Or is there something else im doing wrong? Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 16:24:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB10516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:24:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teilhk@crosswinds.net) Received: from cwpro1.crosswinds.net (cwpro1.crosswinds.net [69.28.227.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0342943D5D for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:24:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teilhk@crosswinds.net) Received: from [201.127.10.40] (helo=fortunato) by cwpro1.crosswinds.net with smtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1EsN3N-000O7b-GP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:24:29 -0500 Message-ID: <023801c60d5d$829377e0$210110ac@fortunato> From: "Teilhard Knight" To: "FreeBDS" References: <1135637177.28971.5.camel@localhost> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:24:29 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cwpro1.crosswinds.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crosswinds.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: PC-BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:24:32 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Victor" To: Cc: Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 4:46 PM Subject: Re: PC-BSD > >> Can PC-BSD be installed in a logical partition? I understand >> FreeBSD can >> only be installed in a primary partition. >> >> Teilhard. > > I'm quite sure you are correct, but I'd ask on the PC-BSD forums, as > this list deals with straight FreeBSD. > > Victor Thank you for your reply. I found the answer explicitly in one of the FAQs of the PC-BSD site. My suspicions were right. It can only be installed in a primary partition. So, now we know. Teilhard. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 16:37:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0991F16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:37:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC7D43D45 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:37:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6723221016A for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:37:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00579-02-45 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:37:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 96BE6210135 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:37:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBUGbWZt012791 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:37:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:37:35 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> References: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051230113442.964C.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: getting sound X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:37:44 -0000 On Friday, December 30, 2005 11:12:07 AM eoghan Subject: getting sound Wrote these words of wisdom: > Hello > I have followed the manual page here for sound setup: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound- > setup.html > Im using freebsd 6.0 with generic kernel. Im not sure what sound > card came with my dell (its 3 years old). > So i did: > #kldload snd_emu10k1 > #kldload snd_driver > then: > #cat /dev/sndstat > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) > Installed devices: > pcm0: at io 0xec40 irq 11 kld snd_es137x(1p/1r/0v > channels duplex default) > This is my first time trying to get the sound working. I try play an > mp3 ans dont hear anything. Perhaps using the snd_driver wont work in > my case... > Is there a way to get freeBSD to show my sound device so I can load > the correct module? Or is there something else im doing wrong? > Thanks > Eoghan ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: If the PC is only three years old, and assuming that no one has worked on it, just go to the Dell web site. Under 'support' you can navigate to where you can place your PC's serial # and it will display how the machine was built. That takes all the guess work out of finding out what is installed. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 16:51:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFB616A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:51:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74C2443D5E for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:51:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2005 16:51:42 -0000 Received: from p54AD940B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO www2.gmx.net) [84.173.148.11] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 30 Dec 2005 17:51:42 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14602519 Received: from oak.pohoyda.family (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.gmx.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBUGpYUX010533; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:51:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from apog@oak.pohoyda.family) Received: (from apog@localhost) by oak.pohoyda.family (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id jBUGpXjA010530; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:51:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from apog) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:51:33 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200512301651.jBUGpXjA010530@oak.pohoyda.family> From: Alexander Pohoyda To: Greg Barniskis In-reply-to: <43B55801.3050106@scls.lib.wi.us> (message from Greg Barniskis on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:53:37 -0600) References: <200512301110.jBUBA7d7000380@oak.pohoyda.family> <43B55801.3050106@scls.lib.wi.us> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursive FTP upload tool? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:51:46 -0000 > > I'm looking for a command-line tool to recursively upload all changed > > files/directories to my homepage server via FTP. Is there anything > > better than wput for this task? > > Have you seen this article on automating command line ftp? > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/excerpt/BSDHacks_chap1/index1.html Good article, thank you very much. > It recommends ncftp client, but I don't know if it does what you > want or not. Yes, it does, but not better than wput, so I'll stick with wput for a while. BTW, I added a feature to read passwords from ~/.netrc file, so whoever needs it, please follow this feature request: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1393643&group_id=141519&atid=749616 -- Alexander Pohoyda PGP Key fingerprint: 7F C9 CC 5A 75 CD 89 72 15 54 5F 62 20 23 C6 44 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 16:54:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1149016A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from romeotheriault@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498E443D4C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from romeotheriault@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so2024305nzo for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:54:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=kbqpuQwc4uxPAt40Ho2kC2ljEsMwZPXYUzRZsLoSmtYXWPv2mlKn1rQvIbNngcTjtVgSGnkssSE66mFH32uuVDQ5/XFPIPP4ICUPtoCWjQrxXZ10Es+UA8KXItZufV8T0iBshx0N9AIITRVYEb3AQra+1BGvKRrNZ0PaFuzgUu0= Received: by 10.65.22.18 with SMTP id z18mr3417024qbi; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:54:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?130.111.68.145? ( [130.111.68.145]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e13sm1446341qba.2005.12.30.08.54.41; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:54:41 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19BC7702-0BBB-4EA4-B717-1B07E42196FF@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Romeo Theriault Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:54:38 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: how to keep a freebsd 6.0 release up to date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:54:43 -0000 Hi, I'm interested in how to keep a freebsd 6.0 release up to date without having to follow the stable branch. All of the security advisories have instructions on how to patch systems up to 5.4, even though 6.0 is listed as affected also. I've read that 'freebsd- update' will do this, is this correct? But if I don't want to use 'freebsd-update' is there a security branch I can follow with CVSup. Thanks, Romeo Theriault From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:02:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 3219216A422; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20051230170201.3219216A422@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:02:01 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:02:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 37DDC16A420; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20051230170201.37DDC16A420@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm constantly updating it. Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:04:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BE916A41F; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:04:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6290943D49; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:04:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from axelds.demon.nl ([83.160.138.74]:22951 helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EsNfj-000GJK-8m; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:04:07 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" To: Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:03:44 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Thread-Index: AcYLxER/2cHh0HbIRu+A+r0r+tpswwBneMLw Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: sendmail-submit and envelope-from X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:04:09 -0000 Hi all, A pity nobody came up with any ideas, oh well. I decided to just change to php syntax instead ( I'd still really like to now what was different in the 'working' setup though). It now reads The submit is still very slow, it takes approximately 3 seconds per mail. Hmmm, I suppose I'll just have to delve into that wonderfull world called sendmail even deeper. Unless, unless, maybe someone does have a pointer or two ?? Anyway, thanks. (not being sarcastic here) Regards, Ruben -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ruben Bloemgarten Sent: December 28, 2005 4:35 PM To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: sendmail-submit and envelope-from Hi all, I hope someone could help me out with the following : On 5.4 I'm running a few jails, one of which is running the mail::toaster incarnation of qmail. All is well. From another jail I want to use a php script to generate mailings rewriting the envelope-from: This does work on a different system, not running on jails with a non ports compile of qmail (not installed by me). The main difference here being that on the 'working system', the mail-sendmail wrapper is used instead of sendmail. So I went and tested the same script on the qmail jail, which has the same 'problem' as sendmail does from the other jail. So something seems to have been changed on this setup to allow this behaviour (I assume having 'From', rewrite both return address and the envelope-from). I can't for the life of me figure out what. Oh, and unrelated but also annoying is the submit from the different jails to the qmail jail is a bit slow. Any pointers anyone ? Thanks, Ruben _______________________________________________ freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.8/215 - Release Date: 12/27/2005 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.8/215 - Release Date: 12/27/2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:04:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5392A16A423 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:04:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEA843D49 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:04:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (qmail 9471 invoked by uid 207); 30 Dec 2005 17:04:15 -0000 Received: from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.30/3.97. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.86):. Processed in 0.084298 secs); 30 Dec 2005 17:04:15 -0000 Received: from dialup86.ach.sch.gr (HELO flame.pc) ([81.186.70.86]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Dec 2005 17:04:15 -0000 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9A078114C0; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:02:56 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:02:56 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: guru@Sisis.de Message-ID: <20051230170256.GA1195@flame.pc> References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:04:22 -0000 On 2005-12-29 16:10, guru@Sisis.de wrote: > El d?a Thursday, December 29, 2005 a las 04:58:14PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas escribi?: > > They are not specific to a single release. You can just copy over > > the distfiles from the older notebook and rebuild your ports. > > That's not true. I copied over the /usr/ports/distfiles from my > 5.4-REL to the 6.0-REL but the ports-collection which comes with > 6.0-REL will use other sources while doing 'make install' in > /usr/ports/x11/kde: > > 5.4-REL: > > $ ls -lutr libtoo* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2699923 29 dic 13:17 libtool-1.5.10.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 538884 29 dic 13:18 libtool-1.3.5.tar.gz > $ cd KDE > $ ls -lutr kdeba* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 22670772 29 dic 13:18 kdebase-3.4.0.tar.bz2 > > 6.0-REL: > > $ ls -lutr libtoo* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2699923 Dec 29 13:17 libtool-1.5.10.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2780846 Dec 29 13:28 libtool-1.5.18.tar.gz > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 538884 Dec 29 14:10 libtool-1.3.5.tar.gz This is because some of the ports have been updated since 5.4-RELEASE was cut. Ports are constantly updated and upgraded to newer, better versions of the packages. Using the same /usr/ports tree will always build the same packages from the same sources though. Sorry for not making this explicit in my original post. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:05:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5F816A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:05:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1C8B43D5C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:05:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 9441 invoked by uid 502); 30 Dec 2005 17:05:22 -0000 Received: from dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.97.72) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Dec 2005 17:05:22 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.97.72 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com Message-ID: <43B568D1.7000002@ywave.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:05:21 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon References: <20051230044420.27250.qmail@web36107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051230044420.27250.qmail@web36107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardware graphics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:05:24 -0000 Jon wrote: > Hi, > > I need some help getting hardware graphics going. I > built radeon.ko and drm.ko from drm cvs and loaded > them, a quick dmesg drm says the modules are loaded. > (drm 1.21.0 20051229) I was told on here I would need > the r300 DRI module for my ATI Radeon 9800 Pro which I > got from the FreeBSD Ports 'dri-6.2.20050719,1', that > built and installed r300_dri.so. I'm using > radeon_drv.o in my Xorg.conf file as the display > driver, I had a look at my Xorg.conf Log file and it > says: > (WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering not yet supported on > Radeon 9500 and newer > (II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration unsupported on > Radeon 9500/9700 and newer. > (II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration disabled > > What else could be the problem? > -- Thanks > FreeBSD 6.0 STABLE I haven't tried it yet on my r300 based card, so I don't know if it will actually work. I think I read that you need to specify r300 as you xorg driver, not radeon. Radeon is the driver for older radeon cards, r300 is the driver for newer radeon cards. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:08:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851B516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:08:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C0D43D55 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:08:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA97488; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:08:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:09:13 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Romeo Theriault In-Reply-To: <19BC7702-0BBB-4EA4-B717-1B07E42196FF@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20051230120737.L78885@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <19BC7702-0BBB-4EA4-B717-1B07E42196FF@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to keep a freebsd 6.0 release up to date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:08:32 -0000 On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Romeo Theriault wrote: > Hi, I'm interested in how to keep a freebsd 6.0 release up to date > without having to follow the stable branch. All of the security > advisories have instructions on how to patch systems up to 5.4, even > though 6.0 is listed as affected also. I've read that > 'freebsd-update' will do this, is this correct? But if I don't want > to use 'freebsd-update' is there a security branch I can follow with > CVSup. Yes. In your supfile for system updates, put *default tag=RELENG_6_0 Then, when you cvsup, you will get 6.0-RELEASE with the latest security updates. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:14:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6AA16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:14:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA1A43D7C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:14:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 62192 invoked by uid 89); 31 Dec 2005 04:14:06 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 62154, pid: 62166, t: 2.2798s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, UPPERCASE_50_75 autolearn=no version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (213.202.167.185) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 04:14:03 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <20051230113442.964C.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> <20051230113442.964C.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <90DE5834-BA44-4F84-90D2-832DD93FAB8E@redry.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:14:02 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: Re: getting sound X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:14:15 -0000 On 30 Dec 2005, at 16:37, Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Friday, December 30, 2005 11:12:07 AM > eoghan > Subject: getting sound > Wrote these words of wisdom: > >> Hello >> I have followed the manual page here for sound setup: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound- >> setup.html >> Im using freebsd 6.0 with generic kernel. Im not sure what sound >> card came with my dell (its 3 years old). >> So i did: >> #kldload snd_emu10k1 >> #kldload snd_driver >> then: >> #cat /dev/sndstat >> FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) >> Installed devices: >> pcm0: at io 0xec40 irq 11 kld snd_es137x(1p/1r/0v >> channels duplex default) >> This is my first time trying to get the sound working. I try play an >> mp3 ans dont hear anything. Perhaps using the snd_driver wont work in >> my case... >> Is there a way to get freeBSD to show my sound device so I can load >> the correct module? Or is there something else im doing wrong? >> Thanks >> Eoghan > > > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** > On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: > > If the PC is only three years old, and assuming that no one has worked > on it, just go to the Dell web site. Under 'support' you can > navigate to > where you can place your PC's serial # and it will display how the > machine was built. That takes all the guess work out of finding out > what > is installed. Thanks for the tip, I got this, but am not sure if the sound card is listed? 1 04VWN LABEL, MSLOGO, W98/W2K 1 211XH LABEL, REGULATORY, SIDE, UNIVERSAL, BLANK, MIDNIGHT GRAY 1 23501 LABEL, BARCODE, SYS BOX, GENERIC 1 23503 LABEL, BARCODE, TRACK, SYSTEM BOARD, GENERIC 1 37MKC HEATSINK, CUSTOM, HI-PWR, ALL COUNTRIES 1 43YVH PROCESSOR, 80528, 1.4GHZ, 0K, 400FSB, SOFTWARE KOGYO 1 48480 SCREW, 6-32X1/4", HX, THREAD FORMED, ZINC PLATED STEEL, TRI-PT 1 5828D CBL ASSY, ATA66, 2DROP, KLINGER 0 58FHK INFORMATION, SLBL3, DIM8100, NETWORK INTERFACE CARD/CONTROLLERS, 3COM 1 5C363 ASSEMBLY, CHASSIS, PREPARED/PREPPED, DIMENSION, MIDNIGHT GRAY, POWER FACTOR CORRECTION 1 64GJY LABEL, FASCIA, INTEL-INSIDE, PENTIUM 4 1 6985R ASSEMBLY, BRACKET, FAN, 92MM, ACOUSTIC 0 71FTK INFORMATION, SLBL2, 1.4GHZ, DESKTOP 2 83MGJ ASSEMBLY, CLIP, HEATSINK, DIMENSION, 8100 1 9019C CBL ASSY, DORADO/ATHENS/TUALATIN/ALMODOR, 34P, FLOPPY DRIVE, 1DROP, HUNNICUT/MEDIUM DESKTOP 1 9809T CBL ASSY, 40P, IDE (INTEGRATED DRIVE ELECTRONICS), 2DROP, LS120 FLOPPY DRIVE 1 9C701 SHROUD, HI-PWR, PROCESSOR, ALL COUNTRIES, 1.0 1 9D307 PRINTED WIRING ASSY, PLANAR (MOTHERBOARD), 8100, NETWORK INTERFACE CARD/CONTROLLERS, CLP/AGP, DIMENSION 1 130NK MODEM, V90, INTERNAL, DATA FAX, SILVER, REST OF WORLD 1 1C883 KIT, COMPACT DISKETTE, DRIVER, MODEM, COPPER, SILVER, DIMENSION 1 2D780 KIT, CABLE, ADAPTER, 4 PIN PHONE CONNECTOR, HANDSET SUPPORT, PC HEALTH, SPAIN/SPANISH 1 09FHK PAD, MOUSE, DELL ECOM LOGO 1 01NRV CORD, POWER, 220V, 2MTR, DISPLAY, IRE/UK 1 23DDC DISPLAY, MULTISCAN, COLOR, 17, DUAL, E771A, NORTHERN HEMISHERE, MIDNIGHT GRAY 1 332TR KEYBOARD, 105, 6P, UNITED KINGDOM, NMB, MIDNIGHT GRAY 0 01295 INFORMATION, FIRST CD ROM 0 2481R INFORMATION, DIGITAL VIDEO DISK DRIVE, DIMENSION, VALIDATOR 0 83535 INFORMATION, PART, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ATTACHMENT PACKET INTERFACE, DEVICE 1 8E186 DIGITAL VIDEO DISK DRIVE, 680M, 16X, I, INTERNAL, NEC CORPORATION, REV2, MIDNIGHT GRAY 0 94198 INFORMATION, NO ONBOARD SOUND 4 94682 SCREW, M3X.5X5MM, HEXHEAD, PHILLIPS HEAD, THREAD FORMED, ZINC PLATED STEEL 1 0996P DISKETTE, BLANK, ZIP DRIVE, 3.5" FORM FACTOR, 250M, 1PCE 1 0C138 REMOVABLE MEDIA STORAGE, ZIP DRIVE, 250M, I, 3.5" FORM FACTOR, IOMEGA, V4, MIDNIGHT GRAY 1 218JF ASSEMBLY, BRACKET, FLOPPY DRIVE, 1.0, GENERIC, MIDNIGHT GRAY 8 94682 SCREW, M3X.5X5MM, HEXHEAD, PHILLIPS HEAD, THREAD FORMED, ZINC PLATED STEEL 2 7064P RAMBUS INLINE MEMORY MODULE, 64, 400M, 32X16, 4C 0 79412 INFORMATION, PRICE INCL MEM 0 8816P INFORMATION, RAMBUS INLINE MEMORY MODULE, 128/400, 2, 8C, NO OPERATING SYSTEM, OPPL 2 9578D CARD (CIRCUIT), MEMORY BOARD, MEMORY, PRINTED WIRING BOARD, CONTINUITY, RAMBUS 1 735HE MOUSE, PERSONAL SYSTEM 2, 6P, 2BTN, WHEEL, 1.3A, MICROSOFT, MALE 1 41RRT HARD DRIVE, 20G, I, 1N, NO CONTROLLER/NO CABLES, QTM-LCT20 4 48480 SCREW, 6-32X1/4", HX, THREAD FORMED, ZINC PLATED STEEL, TRI-PT 0 79409 INFORMATION, EXTREME PERFORMANCE SYSTEM, HARD DRIVE, PRICE LIST, DIMENSION 1 579PK KIT, DOCUMENTATON ON FLOPPY DISK, SOFTWARE, DIGITAL VIDEO DISK DRIVE, IVIB45, WITH DOLBY HEADPHONE TECHNOLOGY 1 4146C KIT, DISKETTE, DIAGNOSTICS, DOS7, 3.5" FORM FACTOR, UNITED STATES 1 48YKH LABEL, CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY, WINDOWS 2000 PROFESSIONAL 1 77MYY KIT, DOCUMENTATION ON COMPACT DISK, WINDOWS 2000 PROFESSIONAL, SP1, 5.25" FORM FACTOR, ENGLAND/ENGLISH 1 088GF CARD (CIRCUIT), MULTI-MEDIA, AUDIO, CT5807, PC164, FRONT AUDIO JACK 1 57589 CABLE, AUDIO, MOLEX TO MOLEX 0 94198 INFORMATION, NO ONBOARD SOUND 1 6C316 'KIT, SOFTWARE, WKS-STE2K1, ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MFGR., UNITED KINGDOM, 7CD 1 16583 CORD, POWER, 2 METERS, IRE/UK 1 33KVP PLACEMAT, GETTING STARTED, DIMENSION, 8100, EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 1 55XMT TECHNICAL SHEET, DIM-NWSLTR, REGIONAL, EUROPE/EUROPEAN, ENGLAND/ENGLISH 1 5768D KIT, COMPACT DISKETTE, DRIVER, DOCUMENTATION, RESRCE-CD 1 65JDG GUIDE, SOLUTION, DIMENSION, 8100, ENGLAND/ENGLISH 1 15UMJ CARD (CIRCUIT), VIDEO, 32M, MRMGA2, DIMENSION 1 16UVG KIT, SPEAKER, 240, MIDNIGHT GRAY, HK19.5, UNITED KINGDOM 1 69PMU FLOPPY DRIVE, 1.44M, 3MD, NO BEZEL, TEAC, B380, MIDNIGHT GRAY 2 94682 SCREW, M3X.5X5MM, HEXHEAD, PHILLIPS HEAD, THREAD FORMED, ZINC PLATED STEEL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:34:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD8516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:34:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC5843D58 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (pimout3-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.218]) by ylpvm29.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBUHYari009962 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:34:36 -0500 X-ORBL: [68.89.209.57] Received: from [192.168.1.25] (68-89-209-57.ded.swbell.net [68.89.209.57]) by pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBUHYPVp019176; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:34:34 -0500 Message-ID: <43B56FA0.3050509@mkproductions.org> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:34:24 -0600 From: Mark Kane User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eoghan References: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> In-Reply-To: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1B0A86F82EA1A322A23C175B" Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: getting sound X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:34:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1B0A86F82EA1A322A23C175B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit eoghan wrote: > Hello > I have followed the manual page here for sound setup: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound- setup.html > Im using freebsd 6.0 with generic kernel. Im not sure what sound card > came with my dell (its 3 years old). > So i did: > #kldload snd_emu10k1 > #kldload snd_driver > then: > #cat /dev/sndstat > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) > Installed devices: > pcm0: at io 0xec40 irq 11 kld snd_es137x(1p/1r/0v > channels duplex default) > This is my first time trying to get the sound working. I try play an > mp3 ans dont hear anything. Perhaps using the snd_driver wont work in > my case... > Is there a way to get freeBSD to show my sound device so I can load the > correct module? Or is there something else im doing wrong? > Thanks > Eoghan It looks to me like the "snd_driver" did it (since it shows "snd_es127x" loaded), but if you still are not getting any sound then check some things. 1) The parts list you pasted seems like it's the Creative CT5807 sound card. I don't see that particular model on the hardware supported list, although similar models are listed under that driver (man snd_es137x). 2) Check the volume. Type "mixer" at a shell and make sure the levels are up. The manpage for "mixer" should tell you how to change those settings if you need to. 3) Are you running KDE or artsd? On one of my machines that I set sound up on a long time ago everything was going fine (no errors, sndstat showed it, etc) but KDE's artsd interfered with the volume when KDE was on. So if you are in KDE then I'd say to stop the GUI and go to the console where artsd won't be running and then do your testing. You can also disable artsd but I'm not sure where as it's been a while since I've used KDE. 4) Are your speakers/headphones/mixer volumes up? -Mark -- GnuPG Public Key: http://www.mkproductions.org/mk_pubkey.asc Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.net IRC: MIXXnet IRC Network - irc.mixxnet.net (Nick: MIXX941) --------------enig1B0A86F82EA1A322A23C175B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDtW+glH2ybcmj7I8RAqJPAKCDISAe5w4Zdy4OmT4dfmR9f3pvhACdGdMM PSpUakjisaZsqrS0yWD2vTc= =s5WJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1B0A86F82EA1A322A23C175B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:48:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D5D16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0253043D53 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA97551; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:48:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:48:52 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Micah In-Reply-To: <43B4B46F.30305@ywave.com> Message-ID: <20051230003646.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <20051229220507.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> <43B4B46F.30305@ywave.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Mozilla plugins broken after port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:48:06 -0000 On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Micah wrote: > Chris Hill wrote: [snip] >> The specific issues are with acroread7, flash and mplayer-plugin. All >> of these worked as plug-ins before the upgrade, but now none of them >> do. [snip] > Search the list archives for "Flash Plugin in 6.0" and "Flash no longer > displayed in Firefox". Neither of those search terms yields any results, but you've given me another direction to look. I searched the archives yet again, this time on 'linuxpluginwrapper'. Found http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=751336+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20051120.freebsd-questions ...based on which, I did # ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ This fixed things partially. A visit to http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/welcome/ shows that "regular" flash works, but not shockwave. Still no luck with PDFs or mplayer-plugin. Another result from my archive search was http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1310074+1313109+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20051120.freebsd-questions ...which revealed the existence of the WITH_PLUGINS make knob for linuxpluginwrapper, so I did tripel# cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper tripel# make deinstall tripel# make -DWITH_PLUGINS reinstall ...which resulted in no change. I'm at a loss regarding the mplayer-plugin stuff. As for Acrobat, I'd bet it has something to do with the disappearance of the path /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Reader/intellinux/bin, but I don't know how that came to exist or why it no longer does. > It's an issue with the linuxpluginwrapper port, several methods to > make it work are described in those recent threads. Thank you for the pointer, especially for the speed of your post. > HTH, > Micah It did, a little. Thank you. But it's still vexing that all this stuff worked fine before, and that the upgrade seems to have broken it. I'm also curious why "about:plugins" shows, for example, mplayer-plugin installed for a wide variety of MIME-types, but trying to access online videos no longer starts mplayer-plugin as it did before the upgrade. My meta-question remains: Is this documented, and if so, where? -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 17:59:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FED16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from lon-mail-3.gradwell.net (lon-mail-3.gradwell.net [193.111.201.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1A343D64 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:59:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from 82-39-194-120.stb.ubr02.jarr.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.39.194.120] helo=webmaker@asgard.uk) by lon-mail-3.gradwell.net with esmtp (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.207) id 43b5758c.95f.67 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:59:40 +0000 (envelope-sender ) From: dgmm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:59:35 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1135754041.21128.18.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <43B4237F.4070606@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <43B4237F.4070606@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512301759.36540.freebsd01@dgmm.net> Subject: Re: New IDE drive in old PC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:59:45 -0000 On Thursday 29 December 2005 17:57, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > I presume you mean GB for size. I just plugged a 250GB drive into a PIII > 500 Supermicro board. The bios thinks it is 8GB. I get No Rom Basic if I > try to boot. I also tried it as an external USB drive and fdisk'd and > bsdlabelled it as 250GB without problem using FBSD6. > > I think if I could have booted there would have been no problem with the > disk on the IDE chain as FBSD sees disks directly not through the BIOS > (or so I understand). FWIW my file/print server is old too. CPU is an AMD K6/2-350. It boots from a 20GB drive and then FreeBSD sees the 160GB and 40GB drives. The BIOS sees the 40GB drive as 8GB and doesn't see the 160GB drive at all. I set all but the primary master BIOS drive settings to NONE. I also learned to my cost when experimenting with installing FreeBSD that setting the BIOS to NONE for an HDD which is actually plugged in doesn't stop FreeBSD from seeing it or formatting it when I slected the "first" drive as the one to slice up ;-) -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:03:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77BB16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:03:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) Received: from aliencamel.com (aliencamel.com [69.93.161.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D003C43D55 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:03:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) X-Virus-Scanned: by both ClamAV and Kaspersky at http://aliencamel.com/ Received: from [71.250.93.200] (account jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) by aliencamel.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.10) with HTTP id 20163691 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:03:02 +0000 From: "JK" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.10 Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:03:02 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200512301110.jBUBA7d7000380@oak.pohoyda.family> References: <200512301110.jBUBA7d7000380@oak.pohoyda.family> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Recursive FTP upload tool? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:03:19 -0000 On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:10:07 +0100 (CET) Alexander Pohoyda wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm looking for a command-line tool to recursively upload all >changed > files/directories to my homepage server via FTP. Is there anything > better than wput for this task? 'rsync' is perfectly suited for this and much much better than ftp. ''man rsync'' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:04:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B5416A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:04:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B58643D8C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:04:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 97386 invoked by uid 89); 31 Dec 2005 05:04:13 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 96874, pid: 96881, t: 24.4357s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (213.202.167.185) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 05:03:48 +1100 In-Reply-To: <43B56FA0.3050509@mkproductions.org> References: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> <43B56FA0.3050509@mkproductions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:03:46 +0000 To: Mark Kane X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: getting sound X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:04:37 -0000 On 30 Dec 2005, at 17:34, Mark Kane wrote: > eoghan wrote: >> Hello >> I have followed the manual page here for sound setup: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound- >> setup.html >> Im using freebsd 6.0 with generic kernel. Im not sure what sound >> card >> came with my dell (its 3 years old). >> So i did: >> #kldload snd_emu10k1 >> #kldload snd_driver >> then: >> #cat /dev/sndstat >> FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) >> Installed devices: >> pcm0: at io 0xec40 irq 11 kld snd_es137x(1p/1r/0v >> channels duplex default) >> This is my first time trying to get the sound working. I try play an >> mp3 ans dont hear anything. Perhaps using the snd_driver wont work in >> my case... >> Is there a way to get freeBSD to show my sound device so I can >> load the >> correct module? Or is there something else im doing wrong? >> Thanks >> Eoghan > > It looks to me like the "snd_driver" did it (since it shows > "snd_es127x" > loaded), but if you still are not getting any sound then check some > things. > > 1) The parts list you pasted seems like it's the Creative CT5807 sound > card. I don't see that particular model on the hardware supported > list, > although similar models are listed under that driver (man snd_es137x). > > 2) Check the volume. Type "mixer" at a shell and make sure the levels > are up. The manpage for "mixer" should tell you how to change those > settings if you need to. > > 3) Are you running KDE or artsd? On one of my machines that I set > sound > up on a long time ago everything was going fine (no errors, sndstat > showed it, etc) but KDE's artsd interfered with the volume when KDE > was > on. So if you are in KDE then I'd say to stop the GUI and go to the > console where artsd won't be running and then do your testing. You can > also disable artsd but I'm not sure where as it's been a while since > I've used KDE. > > 4) Are your speakers/headphones/mixer volumes up? > > -Mark > Thanks Mark Im running KDE (3.4.3) and I have just gone into control center > sound & multimedia > sound system Here I disabled the sound system and reneabled it, which it restarted the sound system. I then clicked the button to text sound. Then I heard sound perfect. I then opened Noatun and tried to play an mp3 but heard nothing. I dont know about artsd, but is this the KDE sound system? I tried the sound system disabled, restart Noatun but still nothing. artsd at konsole says: can't register Arts::MidiManager There are already artsd objects registered, looking if they are active... Error: Can't add object reference (probably artsd is already running). If you are sure it is not already running, remove the relevant files: /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SoundServerV2 /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SoundServer /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SimpleSoundServer /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_PlayObjectFactory /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_AudioManager So, sound works if I test in control centre. But no sound if i try play an mp3... Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:13:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C78216A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:13:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8EF43D66 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:13:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50850730E0; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:22:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75571-07; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:22:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8BC73035; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:22:05 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: <200512301110.jBUBA7d7000380@oak.pohoyda.family> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Message-Id: <965C7CCD-D81D-4675-B9D2-B07BB11335B8@netmusician.org> From: Joe Auty Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:13:21 -0500 To: "JK" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursive FTP upload tool? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:13:26 -0000 On Dec 30, 2005, at 1:03 PM, JK wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:10:07 +0100 (CET) > Alexander Pohoyda wrote: >> Hi folks, >> I'm looking for a command-line tool to recursively upload all changed >> files/directories to my homepage server via FTP. Is there anything >> better than wput for this task? > > 'rsync' is perfectly suited for this and much much better than ftp. > > ''man rsync'' It is, but I believe it only works over SSH. Perhaps it can be configured to work over FTP, I've never tried (no reason to). ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:19:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326B216A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:19:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B9F43D45 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:19:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l36so732687nfa for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:19:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rUzO5+jG3JNBtld5Lk7uZK+wZrVAnI+MGeSQXDrA5IX3a5FWa+KLu2uwTeqtx/vNbooHai8mo5iS7KMBqabcUX6xsHCGmK0pB40mvcAo0XBTZWxzdlGq3SZVUNmK1N6Bwfk/cxztb8Zftza3V9h2ogHnxE0wERBXkpT/poNPs1Q= Received: by 10.48.249.2 with SMTP id w2mr313990nfh; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:19:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.219.3 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:19:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <35c231bf0512301019l256ec6c5q17c39b27d937cbb1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:19:11 -0800 From: David Kirchner Sender: dpkirchner@gmail.com To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:19:13 -0000 Could someone help me find the contact information for the person who is responsible for the bigdisk page? I have a suggested update (related to PR kern/84589) that may help other people using multi-terabyte servers get better usability from FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:21:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59CE16A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:21:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C156343D66 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:20:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 30739 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 18:20:52 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Dec 2005 18:20:52 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AF75A28420; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:20:51 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Joe Auty References: <200512301110.jBUBA7d7000380@oak.pohoyda.family> <965C7CCD-D81D-4675-B9D2-B07BB11335B8@netmusician.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 30 Dec 2005 13:20:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <965C7CCD-D81D-4675-B9D2-B07BB11335B8@netmusician.org> Message-ID: <44ek3ula4c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 33 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: JK , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursive FTP upload tool? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:21:06 -0000 Joe Auty writes: > On Dec 30, 2005, at 1:03 PM, JK wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:10:07 +0100 (CET) > > Alexander Pohoyda wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> I'm looking for a command-line tool to recursively upload all changed > >> files/directories to my homepage server via FTP. Is there anything > >> better than wput for this task? > > > > 'rsync' is perfectly suited for this and much much better than ftp. > > > > ''man rsync'' > > > > It is, but I believe it only works over SSH. Perhaps it can be > configured to work over FTP, I've never tried (no reason to). >From rsync(1): There are two different ways for rsync to contact a remote system: using a remote-shell program as the transport (such as ssh or rsh) or contacting an rsync daemon directly via TCP. The remote-shell trans- port is used whenever the source or destination path contains a single colon (:) separator after a host specification. Contacting an rsync daemon directly happens when the source or destination path contains a double colon (::) separator after a host specification, OR when an rsync:// URL is specified (see also the "USING RSYNC-DAEMON FEATURES VIA A REMOTE-SHELL CONNECTION" section for an exception to this latter rule). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:21:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A8216A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:21:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A24843D8D for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:20:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (pimout1-int.prodigy.net [207.115.5.65]) by ylpvm43.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBUIKwan013703 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:20:58 -0500 X-ORBL: [68.89.209.57] Received: from [192.168.1.25] (68-89-209-57.ded.swbell.net [68.89.209.57]) by pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBUIKlDt102700; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:20:56 -0500 Message-ID: <43B57A7F.7050003@mkproductions.org> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:20:47 -0600 From: Mark Kane User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eoghan References: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> <43B56FA0.3050509@mkproductions.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBE8DFCD234EBFAC408E86745" Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: getting sound X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:21:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBE8DFCD234EBFAC408E86745 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit eoghan wrote: > On 30 Dec 2005, at 17:34, Mark Kane wrote: > >> eoghan wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> I have followed the manual page here for sound setup: >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound- >>> setup.html >>> Im using freebsd 6.0 with generic kernel. Im not sure what sound card >>> came with my dell (its 3 years old). >>> So i did: >>> #kldload snd_emu10k1 >>> #kldload snd_driver >>> then: >>> #cat /dev/sndstat >>> FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) >>> Installed devices: >>> pcm0: at io 0xec40 irq 11 kld snd_es137x(1p/1r/0v >>> channels duplex default) >>> This is my first time trying to get the sound working. I try play an >>> mp3 ans dont hear anything. Perhaps using the snd_driver wont work in >>> my case... >>> Is there a way to get freeBSD to show my sound device so I can load >>> the >>> correct module? Or is there something else im doing wrong? >>> Thanks >>> Eoghan >> >> >> It looks to me like the "snd_driver" did it (since it shows "snd_es127x" >> loaded), but if you still are not getting any sound then check some >> things. >> >> 1) The parts list you pasted seems like it's the Creative CT5807 sound >> card. I don't see that particular model on the hardware supported list, >> although similar models are listed under that driver (man snd_es137x). >> >> 2) Check the volume. Type "mixer" at a shell and make sure the levels >> are up. The manpage for "mixer" should tell you how to change those >> settings if you need to. >> >> 3) Are you running KDE or artsd? On one of my machines that I set sound >> up on a long time ago everything was going fine (no errors, sndstat >> showed it, etc) but KDE's artsd interfered with the volume when KDE was >> on. So if you are in KDE then I'd say to stop the GUI and go to the >> console where artsd won't be running and then do your testing. You can >> also disable artsd but I'm not sure where as it's been a while since >> I've used KDE. >> >> 4) Are your speakers/headphones/mixer volumes up? >> >> -Mark >> > > Thanks Mark > Im running KDE (3.4.3) and I have just gone into control center > sound > & multimedia > sound system > Here I disabled the sound system and reneabled it, which it restarted > the sound system. I then clicked the button to text sound. > Then I heard sound perfect. I then opened Noatun and tried to play an > mp3 but heard nothing. I dont know about artsd, but is this the KDE > sound system? Yeah, the KDE sound system is artsd so that should be the correct area. > I tried the sound system disabled, restart Noatun but still nothing. > artsd at konsole says: > can't register Arts::MidiManager > There are already artsd objects registered, looking if they are active... > > Error: Can't add object reference (probably artsd is already running). > If you are sure it is not already running, remove the relevant > files: > > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SoundServerV2 > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SoundServer > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SimpleSoundServer > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_PlayObjectFactory > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_AudioManager > > So, sound works if I test in control centre. But no sound if i try play > an mp3... > Thanks > Eoghan I've never used Noatun so I'm not sure if it has options that you need to change for sound. If you have KDE's sound system enabled, you'll be using artsd. If you have it disabled, then the OSS in FreeBSD should take over again. So in the options, I'm not sure if it will give you a choice to use artsd output or OSS output, but change them accordingly. Other thing to make sure is that the KDE mixer levels are up. The test sound may work even with some levels of that mixer being down, so look through the KDE menus relating to sound for the Sound Mixer. Then make sure things like Volume, Speaker, etc are all up. Also try the "Input" area of the mixer, since I figured out a long time ago that that's really the "Input" into artsd and if those are down it will not give sound either (that may have changed since I used it though). HTH -Mark -- GnuPG Public Key: http://www.mkproductions.org/mk_pubkey.asc Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.net IRC: MIXXnet IRC Network - irc.mixxnet.net (Nick: MIXX941) --------------enigBE8DFCD234EBFAC408E86745 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDtXp/lH2ybcmj7I8RAt4qAJ4/NdepbJjqeqGU85o5hT/K2FrUkwCeOy47 UzGfjqxjiBBmddD5JZSdm7A= =bZnH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBE8DFCD234EBFAC408E86745-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:22:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BF616A422 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:22:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) Received: from aliencamel.com (aliencamel.com [69.93.161.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D791143D5F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:22:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) X-Virus-Scanned: by both ClamAV and Kaspersky at http://aliencamel.com/ Received: from [71.250.93.200] (account jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) by aliencamel.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.10) with HTTP id 20164187; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:22:45 +0000 From: "JK" To: Joe Auty X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.10 Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:22:45 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <965C7CCD-D81D-4675-B9D2-B07BB11335B8@netmusician.org> References: <200512301110.jBUBA7d7000380@oak.pohoyda.family> <965C7CCD-D81D-4675-B9D2-B07BB11335B8@netmusician.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recursive FTP upload tool? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:22:47 -0000 On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:13:21 -0500 Joe Auty wrote: > > On Dec 30, 2005, at 1:03 PM, JK wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:10:07 +0100 (CET) >> Alexander Pohoyda wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> I'm looking for a command-line tool to recursively upload all >>>changed >>> files/directories to my homepage server via FTP. Is there anything >>> better than wput for this task? >> >> 'rsync' is perfectly suited for this and much much better than ftp. >> >> ''man rsync'' > > > > It is, but I believe it only works over SSH. Perhaps it can be > configured to work over FTP, I've never tried (no reason to). > Can you use ssh? I personally never use nor enable FTP anymore these days given the massive number of script kiddies and serious hackers out there. Regular FTP is just too insecure ( I don't know about more recent ''secure'' FTP ). Just use ssh and if it's not available on the other end beg/tell/require them to enable it I get easily over 1000 attempts per day from hackers trying to break into my poor little colo'd server... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:25:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F57016A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:25:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAAF43D7E for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 13874 invoked by uid 89); 31 Dec 2005 05:25:01 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 13828, pid: 13844, t: 1.6537s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (213.202.167.185) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 05:25:00 +1100 In-Reply-To: <43B57A7F.7050003@mkproductions.org> References: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> <43B56FA0.3050509@mkproductions.org> <43B57A7F.7050003@mkproductions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8D9E86A8-AF5A-4873-9401-19A580160D6D@redry.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:24:58 +0000 To: Mark Kane X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: getting sound X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:25:14 -0000 On 30 Dec 2005, at 18:20, Mark Kane wrote: >> >> Thanks Mark >> Im running KDE (3.4.3) and I have just gone into control center > >> sound >> & multimedia > sound system >> Here I disabled the sound system and reneabled it, which it restarted >> the sound system. I then clicked the button to text sound. >> Then I heard sound perfect. I then opened Noatun and tried to play an >> mp3 but heard nothing. I dont know about artsd, but is this the KDE >> sound system? > > Yeah, the KDE sound system is artsd so that should be the correct > area. > >> I tried the sound system disabled, restart Noatun but still nothing. >> artsd at konsole says: >> can't register Arts::MidiManager >> There are already artsd objects registered, looking if they are >> active... >> >> Error: Can't add object reference (probably artsd is already >> running). >> If you are sure it is not already running, remove the >> relevant >> files: >> >> /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SoundServerV2 >> /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SoundServer >> /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SimpleSoundServer >> /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_PlayObjectFactory >> /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_AudioManager >> >> So, sound works if I test in control centre. But no sound if i >> try play >> an mp3... >> Thanks >> Eoghan > > I've never used Noatun so I'm not sure if it has options that you need > to change for sound. If you have KDE's sound system enabled, you'll be > using artsd. If you have it disabled, then the OSS in FreeBSD should > take over again. So in the options, I'm not sure if it will give you a > choice to use artsd output or OSS output, but change them accordingly. > > Other thing to make sure is that the KDE mixer levels are up. The test > sound may work even with some levels of that mixer being down, so look > through the KDE menus relating to sound for the Sound Mixer. Then make > sure things like Volume, Speaker, etc are all up. Also try the "Input" > area of the mixer, since I figured out a long time ago that that's > really the "Input" into artsd and if those are down it will not give > sound either (that may have changed since I used it though). > > HTH > > -Mark Thanks again Ive since tried okle (for a dvd) and KsCD with an audio cd and both work perfect. I will check around for a different mp3 player and see if it works. But Im getting there :) Thanks for the help Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:26:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285ED16A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:26:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3514D43D88 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:26:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 3789 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 18:26:20 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Dec 2005 18:26:20 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CD00428420; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:26:19 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: eoghan References: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> <43B56FA0.3050509@mkproductions.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 30 Dec 2005 13:26:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44aceil9v8.fsf_-_@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 95 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: getting sound in KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:26:28 -0000 eoghan writes: > On 30 Dec 2005, at 17:34, Mark Kane wrote: > > > eoghan wrote: > >> Hello > >> I have followed the manual page here for sound setup: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound- > >> setup.html > >> Im using freebsd 6.0 with generic kernel. Im not sure what sound > >> card > >> came with my dell (its 3 years old). > >> So i did: > >> #kldload snd_emu10k1 > >> #kldload snd_driver > >> then: > >> #cat /dev/sndstat > >> FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) > >> Installed devices: > >> pcm0: at io 0xec40 irq 11 kld snd_es137x(1p/1r/0v > >> channels duplex default) > >> This is my first time trying to get the sound working. I try play an > >> mp3 ans dont hear anything. Perhaps using the snd_driver wont work in > >> my case... > >> Is there a way to get freeBSD to show my sound device so I can > >> load the > >> correct module? Or is there something else im doing wrong? > >> Thanks > >> Eoghan > > > > It looks to me like the "snd_driver" did it (since it shows > > "snd_es127x" > > loaded), but if you still are not getting any sound then check some > > things. > > > > 1) The parts list you pasted seems like it's the Creative CT5807 sound > > card. I don't see that particular model on the hardware supported > > list, > > although similar models are listed under that driver (man snd_es137x). > > > > 2) Check the volume. Type "mixer" at a shell and make sure the levels > > are up. The manpage for "mixer" should tell you how to change those > > settings if you need to. > > > > 3) Are you running KDE or artsd? On one of my machines that I set > > sound > > up on a long time ago everything was going fine (no errors, sndstat > > showed it, etc) but KDE's artsd interfered with the volume when KDE > > was > > on. So if you are in KDE then I'd say to stop the GUI and go to the > > console where artsd won't be running and then do your testing. You can > > also disable artsd but I'm not sure where as it's been a while since > > I've used KDE. > > > > 4) Are your speakers/headphones/mixer volumes up? > > > > -Mark > > > > Thanks Mark > Im running KDE (3.4.3) and I have just gone into control center > > sound & multimedia > sound system > Here I disabled the sound system and reneabled it, which it restarted > the sound system. I then clicked the button to text sound. > Then I heard sound perfect. I then opened Noatun and tried to play an > mp3 but heard nothing. I dont know about artsd, but is this the KDE > sound system? > I tried the sound system disabled, restart Noatun but still nothing. > artsd at konsole says: > can't register Arts::MidiManager > There are already artsd objects registered, looking if they are > active... > > Error: Can't add object reference (probably artsd is already running). > If you are sure it is not already running, remove the > relevant files: > > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SoundServerV2 > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SoundServer > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_SimpleSoundServer > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_PlayObjectFactory > /tmp/mcop-root/Arts_AudioManager > > So, sound works if I test in control centre. But no sound if i try > play an mp3... Okay, so you have FreeBSD's sound drivers working fine, and you just need to get KDE to use it properly. I don't know anything about KDE, but enabling virtual channels may make life easier. See the manual for sound(4) for details. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:34:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E02D16A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:34:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3B843D8B for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:34:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so713632nfe for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:34:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=RIf8dTiTZ36SnYjSq9YfRc10E8f1t6sST7W1tUSVv3fwClnVnUG+KfeEdO0kQntd7JEHs22GjPH3vQ9PacSs2JGpaW8bKb2Zdo//zGih0NgqXe+sTaINU0GvKKMd8GkNwbS3pJGQxGHFt5CQDC2SMDHRpm13UqOIdhAko/ERySw= Received: by 10.48.244.20 with SMTP id r20mr440892nfh; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:34:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.219.3 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:34:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <35c231bf0512301034g4de5a2fevc48721188863c818@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:34:26 -0800 From: David Kirchner Sender: dpkirchner@gmail.com To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Developer's Handbook DDB instructions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:34:38 -0000 I'm trying to track down a background fsck deadlock bug. I've found a thread on groups.google.com about another person having a similar problem but with snapshots. The suggestion made there was to compile a kernel with DDB, and the user was referred to the Developer's Handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kernel= debug-online-ddb.html The Handbook appears to be out of date -- it states that you have to add "options DDB" to the kernel config to enable DDB. When you try that, part way through the make depend process it informs you that you also need KDB. Are there any other steps necessary to get DDB to work on a newer version of FreeBSD (say 6.0-RELEASE)? Since this particular deadlock test will probably take 12+ hours of runtime to trigger, I'd like to get this right, so I can get as much information as possible into a PR. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:37:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB51B16A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:37:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbhurtha@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EC343D49 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:37:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbhurtha@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so708192uge for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:37:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fOVHNOgmmuE+8NpfgeHDQIkuqi5T+zmOBhfYcKyAxzceSUfZkAKsa8AFGZy/1Dm1mGIqf006p6KLQchA/yOw4oLCFV6dJq9HJwwyHpKJan6djiBnoLNWse93qIry2W76Zg4cPm9PH6arbG/zT/K9Fo3+6ea1hxHAO4AhLAh7Gl0= Received: by 10.67.23.8 with SMTP id a8mr3495938ugj; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:37:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.237.11 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:37:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:37:02 +0000 From: Roshan To: eoghan In-Reply-To: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: getting sound X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:37:25 -0000 On 12/30/05, eoghan wrote: > Hello > I have followed the manual page here for sound setup: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound- > setup.html > Im using freebsd 6.0 with generic kernel. Im not sure what sound > card came with my dell (its 3 years old). > So i did: > #kldload snd_emu10k1 > #kldload snd_driver > then: > #cat /dev/sndstat > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) > Installed devices: > pcm0: at io 0xec40 irq 11 kld snd_es137x(1p/1r/0v > channels duplex default) > This is my first time trying to get the sound working. I try play an > mp3 ans dont hear anything. Perhaps using the snd_driver wont work in > my case... > Is there a way to get freeBSD to show my sound device so I can load > the correct module? Or is there something else im doing wrong? > Thanks > Eoghan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > if you play an mp3 using a non-kde app, like mplayer or mpg123 , it will not play in my experience. artsd monopolises the sound device. what you have to do is kill the artsd, then you can play mp3's using mplayer or xmms or mpg123. command to kill artsd: # killall artsd then try playing your mp3.... Roshan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:39:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178D116A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:39:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com (hosting-28.42.rev.fr.colt.net [213.41.42.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3692943D55 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:39:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280D63760BA for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:39:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (freefugu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20876-05 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:38:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.bsdmon.com (14.128.101-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.101.128.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527553760B7 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:38:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by sdf1.bsdmon.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A40EBB853; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:38:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:38:47 +0100 From: Gilbert Cao To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051230183847.GA9133@bsdmon.com> References: <20051228112558.GA79302@bsdmon.com> <20051229155156.GB1075@bsdmon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051229155156.GB1075@bsdmon.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE i386 Organization: BSDMon X-GPG-Key: http://www.bsdmon.com/public_key.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdmon.com Subject: Re: Preserve date when cp over smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:39:25 -0000 --wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 04:51:56PM +0100, Gilbert Cao wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 12:25:58PM +0100, Gilbert Cao wrote: > >=20 > > I have quickly looked into the source code of both cp and gqview, and i= t seems > > that cp relies on utimes(), and gqview relies on utime(). > >=20 >=20 > Hi, > I have finally done my little investigation when applying utime() or utim= es() > to a SMB file path : >=20 > In both case, the access and modification times are preserved. > So it seems that the cp and tar utilities does not its job about > preserving times over SMB path (I still don't know why ...). >=20 > I have a source code example available, if anyone is interested. Hi, again. This time, I have done more investigation in the src/bin/cp source code and I have finally found the problem : In SMB only case, when utimes() is called *BEFORE* the fd of the newly created file is close(), it does not do anything. I have made a little patch to correct this. So please, committers, can the correction be applied to the cp utility (Perhaps it is the same problem in the tar utility) ? I will be very grateful. --=20 -------------------------------- (hika) Gilbert Cao http://www.miaouirc.com - MiaouIRC Project 2002-2003 http://www.bsdmon.com - The BSD DMON Power to serve IRC : #miaule at IRCNET Network -------------------------------- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch_cp_utils.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --- ./src/bin/cp/utils.c.orig Sat Nov 12 22:21:45 2005 +++ ./src/bin/cp/utils.c Fri Dec 30 19:23:04 2005 @@ -204,8 +204,6 @@ * to remove it if we created it and its length is 0. */ =20 - if (pflag && setfile(fs, to_fd)) - rval =3D 1; if (pflag && preserve_fd_acls(from_fd, to_fd) !=3D 0) rval =3D 1; (void)close(from_fd); @@ -213,6 +211,14 @@ warn("%s", to.p_path); rval =3D 1; } + /* + * To preserve times in SMB to.p_path,=20 + * setfile() should be call *AFTER* we have closed the file + * descriptors. As we have closed the descriptors, we should + * pass -1 instead of the `to_fd` value + */ + if (pflag && setfile(fs, -1)) + rval =3D 1; return (rval); } =20 --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- --wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDtX62SyQfFTqAEpcRAmQbAKCue9dusLD+gwiT2jb3jcncBljAlQCgujKs dQ43k1FgMN3bZwTj1LfDxGg= =0e9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:42:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7039916A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:42:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FA843D8B for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 24964 invoked by uid 89); 31 Dec 2005 05:41:41 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 24922, pid: 24935, t: 2.1372s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (213.202.167.185) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 05:41:38 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <40D83E7E-BCDF-43F4-B852-AF66C3B0DD1E@redry.net> <43B56FA0.3050509@mkproductions.org> <43B57A7F.7050003@mkproductions.org> <8D9E86A8-AF5A-4873-9401-19A580160D6D@redry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:41:35 +0000 To: Roshan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: getting sound in KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:42:04 -0000 On 30 Dec 2005, at 18:35, Roshan wrote: >> Thanks again >> Ive since tried okle (for a dvd) and KsCD with an audio cd and both >> work perfect. >> I will check around for a different mp3 player and see if it works. >> But Im getting there :) >> Thanks for the help >> Eoghan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > if you play an mp3 using a non-kde app, like mplayer or mpg123 , it > will not play in my experience. artsd monopolises the sound device. > what you have to do is kill the artsd, then you can play mp3's using > mplayer or xmms or mpg123. > > command to kill artsd: > > # killall artsd > then try playing your mp3.... I tried that and Noatun still doesnt play the mp3. But before i did the killall i tried kaboodle (which is a kde app is assume?), and it played fine. Thanks to everyone who has helped. At least now i can hear freebsd :) Regards Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 18:45:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DB216A422 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:45:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E287643D66 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:45:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id jBUIjJhH009025; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:45:20 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 823E311922; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:44:05 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:44:05 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: guru@Sisis.de Message-ID: <20051230184405.GA1237@flame.pc> References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> <43B4194E.9020203@scls.lib.wi.us> <20051230082550.GA4596@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051230082550.GA4596@rebelion.Sisis.de> Cc: Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net>, Greg Barniskis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:45:28 -0000 On 2005-12-30 09:25, guru@Sisis.de wrote: > In the company, where I'm at the moment, I've an uplink to Internet of > 2 mb, at home I've 64 kbit; so my idea was to fetch, lets say 4 CD at > high speed, burn them and use them at home for the needed disfiles This is where the -F option of portupgrade becomes *very* useful: - On the system with the fast connection, you update your /usr/ports tree and then run portupgrade: # portupgrade -a -vuN -F - Copy over both /usr/ports and /usr/ports/distfiles Now updates from the disconnected system should be easy as long as you use the same options when building the ports on the two systems (since some of the port options may affect the number and version of distfiles downloaded). Another way to update systems that use similar versions of FreeBSD on the same architecture is to use pkg_create(1) (with the -b option) to save the packages of one system and pkg_add(1) to install them on another. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 19:09:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCCB16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:09:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: from web54009.mail.yahoo.com (web54009.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE31E43D75 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:09:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 56090 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Dec 2005 19:09:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=A4hQaAnmB1/gtpdrLDg/yyL4MJpQmKQ7QMl9433aszwwX02ObvN6QHKrqrMHK7OEN0INbcrcK98rBCHub4JxSJyvM3Su3AAVs6zdlakhKBUuCnueKXMIaJjyM8lmOBJReyBIW52+Jsd9IYtMLhUK4TczXZayqHjjsX4ErF69aO4= ; Message-ID: <20051230190913.56088.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [71.140.186.33] by web54009.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:09:13 PST Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:09:13 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Marciano To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44bqyyk5cp.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: How do I get gdbserver for FreeBSD 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:09:22 -0000 --- Lowell Gilbert > gdbserver isn't currently ported for FreeBSD. If > you really need it (as opposed to some other form of > remote debugging), you could probably best get started > by asking obrien for hints. Thanks for the info Lowell. What do you mean by "some other form of remove debugging"? What I want to do is attach gdb from a development machine to a process running on an remote embedded target (stripped binaries, no source). I've only recently heard of gdbserver. I'm happy to use an alternative, if one exists. Thanks, Paul. __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 19:22:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC39516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:22:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DF2E43D69 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:22:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 18440 invoked by uid 502); 30 Dec 2005 19:22:11 -0000 Received: from dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.97.72) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Dec 2005 19:22:11 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.97.72 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com Message-ID: <43B588E2.4000600@ywave.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:22:10 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Hill References: <20051229220507.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> <43B4B46F.30305@ywave.com> <20051230003646.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20051230003646.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Mozilla plugins broken after port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:22:14 -0000 Chris Hill wrote: > On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Micah wrote: > >> Chris Hill wrote: > > > [snip] > >>> The specific issues are with acroread7, flash and mplayer-plugin. All >>> of these worked as plug-ins before the upgrade, but now none of them do. > > > [snip] > >> Search the list archives for "Flash Plugin in 6.0" and "Flash no >> longer displayed in Firefox". > > > Neither of those search terms yields any results, but you've given me > another direction to look. I searched the archives yet again, this time > on 'linuxpluginwrapper'. Found > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=751336+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20051120.freebsd-questions > > > ...based on which, I did > # ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so > /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ > > This fixed things partially. A visit to > http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/welcome/ > shows that "regular" flash works, but not shockwave. > > Still no luck with PDFs or mplayer-plugin. > > Another result from my archive search was > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1310074+1313109+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20051120.freebsd-questions > ...which revealed the existence of the WITH_PLUGINS make knob for > linuxpluginwrapper, so I did > tripel# cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > tripel# make deinstall > tripel# make -DWITH_PLUGINS reinstall > > ...which resulted in no change. > > I'm at a loss regarding the mplayer-plugin stuff. As for Acrobat, I'd > bet it has something to do with the disappearance of the path > /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Reader/intellinux/bin, but > I don't know how that came to exist or why it no longer does. > >> It's an issue with the linuxpluginwrapper port, several methods to >> make it work are described in those recent threads. > > > Thank you for the pointer, especially for the speed of your post. > >> HTH, >> Micah > > > It did, a little. Thank you. > > But it's still vexing that all this stuff worked fine before, and that > the upgrade seems to have broken it. I'm also curious why > "about:plugins" shows, for example, mplayer-plugin installed for a wide > variety of MIME-types, but trying to access online videos no longer > starts mplayer-plugin as it did before the upgrade. > > My meta-question remains: Is this documented, and if so, where? > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] The mailman search interface is screwed up, and the FreeBSD search engine and Google haven't indexed recent threads yet. A look through December's archives would've turned these up. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-December/107922.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-December/107098.html HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 19:28:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4105B16A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:28:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B30E43D4C for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:28:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-43-91.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.43.91]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id jBUJSQEo011282 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:28:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <005201c60d76$0cc7f1d0$0900a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:20:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: syslog in jail on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:28:31 -0000 Hello, I've got two jail issues on 6.0. My first problem is when i start the jail via /etc/rc.d/jail start i get this message from the jail startup: syslogd child pid PIDNUM exited with return code 1 and i don't get jail logging. I've got syslog running on the hostsystem and in the jail both logging to their respected logging locations. My second issue is it appears devfs in the jail isn't being mounted. In my host system's rc.conf file i have a jail devfs mount line, but i have to manually mount devfs before i start the jail. Any ideas? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 19:37:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FECC16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:37:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573FD43D46 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:37:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from axelds.demon.nl ([83.160.138.74]:58278 helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EsQ3f-0003Sj-O3; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:36:59 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" To: "'Dave'" , Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:36:36 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <005201c60d76$0cc7f1d0$0900a8c0@satellite> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Thread-Index: AcYNd8tRXxcg0gulQQm1J/mTFqw/sgAADmIA Cc: Subject: RE: syslog in jail on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:37:02 -0000 Hi Dave, Could you send your rc.conf from your mainsystem and jail, syslog.conf from the jail. Also, how did you generate the jail and what is it's purpose ? Regards, Ruben -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dave Sent: December 30, 2005 8:20 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: syslog in jail on 6.0 Hello, I've got two jail issues on 6.0. My first problem is when i start the jail via /etc/rc.d/jail start i get this message from the jail startup: syslogd child pid PIDNUM exited with return code 1 and i don't get jail logging. I've got syslog running on the hostsystem and in the jail both logging to their respected logging locations. My second issue is it appears devfs in the jail isn't being mounted. In my host system's rc.conf file i have a jail devfs mount line, but i have to manually mount devfs before i start the jail. Any ideas? Thanks. Dave. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: 12/29/2005 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: 12/29/2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 19:43:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0BE16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:43:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8798143D60 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:43:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6007B210131 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11018-01-18 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:43:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F780210138 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:43:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBUJhRx7013364 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:43:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:43:30 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051230144037.836A.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Unable to build 'icu-3.4' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:43:42 -0000 Several users, including myself, are unable to install 'icu-3.4'. I have contacted both the maintainer and the 'icu' development staff regarding this problem. The following is the feed back that I have received up to this point. First of all, the output from 'uname -a' FreeBSD seibercom.net 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Wed Nov 23 15:16:09 EST 2005 ges@seibercom.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SEIBERCOM3 i386 I contacted the maintainer regarding this problem, and this was his response. ---------------------- Original Message Starts--------------------- From: Mikhail Teterin Congratulations! You have found a bug in ICU (or in one of its self-tests). From your log: [...] ---[OK] ---/custrtrn/Test_widestrs cintltst in free(): error: page is already free Abort trap (core dumped) *** Error code 134 You can avoid the crash by removing the 'a' from your MALLOC_FLAGS. To fix the underlying problem, please, consider filing a bug report with ICU. I'll try to dig it up, but I'm a little swapmed at the moment :-( Thanks for the report. Yours, -mi --------------------- Original Message Ends -------------------- Since I have no idea how to remove a flag, other than the one that flies on the pole in my front lawn, I contacted the 'icu' staff and submitted a bug report. The following is their response. ----------------------- Original Message Starts ------------------- Please build a debuggable version of ICU, and supply a stack trace of the failure in the bug report. We can't reproduce this bug on other platforms with heap debuggers, and the test suite doesn't fail on other versions of FreeBSD. ----------------------- Original Message Ends -------------------- The entire build and attempted install log is available at this URL: http://www2.seibercom.net:9545/log/icu3-4 I would really appreciate it if someone could assist me with this problem. I know for a fact that I am not the only individual that cannot get 'icu-3.4' installed. If someone could instruct me on how to make a debuggable version and supply a stack trace of the failure it would be very much appreciated. Any other suggestions, etc. would be very much appreciated. This problem, by the way, is causing 'python-boost' not to build which causes 'kdeede3' not to build either. Thanks in advance! -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 20:09:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB6016A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:09:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B70E43D62 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:09:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20849 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2005 20:09:18 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Dec 2005 20:09:18 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 42E8528420; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:09:18 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Paul Marciano References: <20051230190913.56088.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 30 Dec 2005 15:09:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051230190913.56088.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <441wzul53l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I get gdbserver for FreeBSD 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:09:19 -0000 Paul Marciano writes: > --- Lowell Gilbert > > > gdbserver isn't currently ported for FreeBSD. If > > you really need it (as opposed to some other form of > > remote debugging), you could probably best get > started > > by asking obrien for hints. > > Thanks for the info Lowell. > > What do you mean by "some other form of remove > debugging"? > > What I want to do is attach gdb from a development > machine to a process running on an remote embedded > target (stripped binaries, no source). I've only > recently heard of gdbserver. I'm happy to use an > alternative, if one exists. Oh; I thought you wanted to run gdbserver on *FreeBSD*. The *client* side is going to need a gdb agent of some sort; gdbserver might work if the embedded machine is sufficiently Unix-like. Otherwise, you may need a custom gdb on your FreeBSD machine as well as a debugging agent on the target. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 20:11:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1B516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao_francisco_borges@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web50515.mail.yahoo.com (web50515.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1D6B43D73 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:11:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao_francisco_borges@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 44299 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Dec 2005 20:11:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TyfGnn1omhbTThcoyMUCKVM4rmXtTNbuHTnW4R/eeFTv/7cACKba6LBCMWoJZS3v2gaiiz2g8NzZvL6GGXonOuTLVjZrVijwXPrACGFLbVy92++eUg4IX2AdNu6Un3F14EL6ev+XaxLvvL4MzR+kLUld6fOMli2ifrxkfWn4Rgs= ; Message-ID: <20051230201125.44296.qmail@web50515.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [201.6.32.220] by web50515.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:11:25 GMT Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:11:25 +0000 (GMT) From: Joao Borges To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Some questions on chmod in FAT hdd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:11:31 -0000 Hello everybody I've finally installed and ran Samba 3 on my FreeBSD 5.4. Then, wanting to share a directory I applyed on directory drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1638 Dec 30 13:58 shared the following command (as root): chmod -R a=rwx shared It doesn't return error but when I look up the new atribution it is the same. Indeed this directory is inside a mounting point which has the same attributes (ie the mounting operation copies the mounting point attributtes and then I can't change any attributes inside the mounting point). By the way the mount is a msdosfs type. Can I deal with this problem? Is it a bug (so I report) or I am doing some mistake? I've also performed a Windows XP to FreeBSD transfer via Network using Samba. The transfer made useless all the archives involved (some mp3). I shared a full access share on FreeBSD and then copied and paste on the XP station the files. Then on FreeBSD they were useless. Can anybody tell what happened? Att Joao Francisco _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage. http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 20:17:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF2116A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:17:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FCF43D46 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:17:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBUKH5x4020887; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:17:08 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, guru@sisis.de Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:17:49 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051230103942.GB9413@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20051230103942.GB9413@rebelion.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512301217.50044.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && ports/devel/subversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:17:57 -0000 On Friday 30 December 2005 02:39 am, guru@sisis.de wrote: > Hi, > > the ports compilation of subversion-1.2.1 failes with: > > subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:32:23: ne_socket.h: No such file or > directory subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:33:24: ne_request.h: No > such file or directory subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:34:22: > ne_props.h: No such file or directory > subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:35:22: ne_basic.h: No such file or > directory > > > it seems that the missing header files are part of > ports/www/neon/ but don't get installed; > > what is the right way to fix this? > Thx > Were you using portupgrade or portmanage? They are supposed to=20 automagically take care of problems like that. Sometimes, even if you use them, the build doesn't happen but if you=20 look at the configure messages, you will see it is missing. Since it is=20 in the dependancy list, I would just build neon and try building=20 subversion again.=20 I first would try updating subversion with one of the tools and see if=20 it is fixed for you. Kent =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 21:02:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B67816A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:02:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: from web54004.mail.yahoo.com (web54004.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 106F843D5A for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:02:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 39140 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Dec 2005 21:02:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Xh9NPEgPNPdd/jqISkbo0ZqRVgN/peG47Ae0+mNeJm5u0F6oftlnq0YkcFgeSdvrPFc+w7s35APrxn7JugK063OiblmUmCJIlGVycuo6mJhA1drMXaKMjgf3vJ7LEzlxFgSqFmX+qfedOdC7WPDit1r6MAMtHaFL4VRrGEajMrI= ; Message-ID: <20051230210247.39138.qmail@web54004.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [71.140.186.33] by web54004.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:02:47 PST Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:02:47 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Marciano To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <441wzul53l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: How do I get gdbserver for FreeBSD 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:02:49 -0000 --- Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Paul Marciano writes: > > What I want to do is attach gdb from a development > > machine to a process running on an remote embedded > > target (stripped binaries, no source). I've only > > recently heard of gdbserver. I'm happy to use an > > alternative, if one exists. > > Oh; I thought you wanted to run gdbserver on > *FreeBSD*. ACK! Wires crossing! Both the target and the client are FreeBSD-5.4, but the target has limited flash and no local utilities so I can't debug on it natively (I'd rather not mount NFS utility partitions, but that's an option if there's nothing more elegant). So I do need a FreeBSD target gdbserver-like thing! Paul. __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 21:13:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FC116A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mohdarab@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D99A43D46 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mohdarab@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so1600283wra for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:13:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=XZIQoI6OEQXV1s4V2+GSdET9HcziGJsZTwq8ixoe9l+en2k3svZAbCVVj6DptRsOAE4N9ixKrAqEbpO6GVRqfqZ2RaRj5bvZZwiV98M8J2NUnp8AeTgSOqdf4+U2Mg13QcqIl0QwREXndIsZxPUfe1Ys9r8SR6oVA1bSFUM069c= Received: by 10.54.112.1 with SMTP id k1mr11201671wrc; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:13:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.84.6 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:13:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:13:44 +0300 From: Mohammed Arab To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Help me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:13:46 -0000 Hi, I would like to get some information from you regarding freebsd system, really is very confuse to know which one is stable system when i went to site i found many freebsd system one is called stable and another one is current and release. Can you please explain me on this topic and which one = i have to choice. I am interesting to know everything about this system. Also there is no GUI Graphics on freebsd and why I have manually install and configure video graphics also. can you help me and give me the instruction how to setup VGA CARD. I am waiting for your reply. Thanks, Mohammed Arab From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 21:27:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1E516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:27:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EC543D64 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:27:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EsRmN-000708-1Y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:27:15 +0100 Received: from r5bp69.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.75.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:27:15 +0100 Received: from element by r5bp69.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:27:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Pavel Duda Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:27:01 +0100 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <20051230014445.X1087@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5bp69.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20051230014445.X1087@ganymede.hub.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: How much memory is a jail using ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:27:26 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Is there an easy way to do this? I know I can find out what processes > are running in a jail by looking at /proc/*/status ,but none of the > fields appear to relate to memory used by that process ... so, I'm > guessing I should be able to 'read' one of the other fiels in the procfs > directory for this? > > Thanks ... > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hmm interesting question, I'm afraid that fastest but not very accurate way is to use ps SIZE and count it for jailed processes. Pavel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 21:36:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF6516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:36:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C9A43D67 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:36:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A809C998259 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:36:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01882-06-6 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:36:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.98.231.227] (catv-5062e7e3.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.231.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564EA99825F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:36:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43B5A859.1020605@t-hosting.hu> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:36:25 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: Subject: Users unknown in jail, what to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:36:50 -0000 Hello, I've set up a jail and started it with: jail -u root /path/to/jail hostname ip /bin/sh When I tried to install a port inside the jail I got an error message that I don't have the mtree files. I don't know why those files haven't been built but I copied it from the host system to the jail. Now I get: mtree: line 6: unknown user root *** Error code 1 I copied passwd, master.passwd, group, nsswitch.conf files, too, but I get the same. Could somebody tell me how can I solve this? Thanks in advance, Gabor Kovesdan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 21:50:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4673E16A41F; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from msgmmp-4.gci.net (msgmmp-4.gci.net [209.165.130.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E6843D5D; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:50:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from stargate.akparadise.com ([209.124.141.64]) by msgmmp-4.gci.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.03 (built Jun 27 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0ISB0058DZ9KLEE0@msgmmp-4.gci.net>; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:48:58 -0900 (AKST) Received: by stargate.akparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id BD2D33F93; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:48:56 -0900 (AKST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:48:41 -0900 From: Beech Rintoul In-reply-to: <43B588E2.4000600@ywave.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200512301248.55329.akbeech@gmail.com> Organization: NorthWind Communications MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1302224.J9nd98VGHI; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20051229220507.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> <20051230003646.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> <43B588E2.4000600@ywave.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Micah , FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Mozilla plugins broken after port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:50:09 -0000 --nextPart1302224.J9nd98VGHI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 30 December 2005 10:22 am, Micah wrote: > Chris Hill wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Micah wrote: > >> Chris Hill wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > >>> The specific issues are with acroread7, flash and mplayer-plugin. All > >>> of these worked as plug-ins before the upgrade, but now none of them > >>> do. > > > > [snip] > > > >> Search the list archives for "Flash Plugin in 6.0" and "Flash no > >> longer displayed in Firefox". > > > > Neither of those search terms yields any results, but you've given me > > another direction to look. I searched the archives yet again, this time > > on 'linuxpluginwrapper'. Found > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D751336+0+/usr/local/www/d= b/te > >xt/2005/freebsd-questions/20051120.freebsd-questions > > > > > > ...based on which, I did > > # ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so > > /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ > > > > This fixed things partially. A visit to > > http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/welcome/ > > shows that "regular" flash works, but not shockwave. > > > > Still no luck with PDFs or mplayer-plugin. > > > > Another result from my archive search was > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D1310074+1313109+/usr/loca= l/ww > >w/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20051120.freebsd-questions ...which > > revealed the existence of the WITH_PLUGINS make knob for > > linuxpluginwrapper, so I did > > tripel# cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > > tripel# make deinstall > > tripel# make -DWITH_PLUGINS reinstall > > > > ...which resulted in no change. > > > > I'm at a loss regarding the mplayer-plugin stuff. As for Acrobat, I'd > > bet it has something to do with the disappearance of the path > > /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Reader/intellinux/bin, but > > I don't know how that came to exist or why it no longer does. > > > >> It's an issue with the linuxpluginwrapper port, several methods to > >> make it work are described in those recent threads. > > > > Thank you for the pointer, especially for the speed of your post. > > > >> HTH, > >> Micah > > > > It did, a little. Thank you. > > > > But it's still vexing that all this stuff worked fine before, and that > > the upgrade seems to have broken it. I'm also curious why > > "about:plugins" shows, for example, mplayer-plugin installed for a wide > > variety of MIME-types, but trying to access online videos no longer > > starts mplayer-plugin as it did before the upgrade. > > > > My meta-question remains: Is this documented, and if so, where? > > > > -- > > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] > > The mailman search interface is screwed up, and the FreeBSD search > engine and Google haven't indexed recent threads yet. A look through > December's archives would've turned these up. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-December/107922= =2Eh >tml > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-December/107098= =2Eh >tml > =46or acroread make sure you rename /usr/local/bin/acroread7=20 to /usr/local/bin/acroread. Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@gmail.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://akparadise.byethost33.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1302224.J9nd98VGHI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDtatHVq19LUoGB+MRAvWsAJ4kuYYp/8L1MlC+IPvstgvDCXzkwQCfRETe Wqlk3Ie0LvUQQuXBeh+sMyk= =M4CB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1302224.J9nd98VGHI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 21:50:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4673E16A41F; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from msgmmp-4.gci.net (msgmmp-4.gci.net [209.165.130.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E6843D5D; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:50:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from stargate.akparadise.com ([209.124.141.64]) by msgmmp-4.gci.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.03 (built Jun 27 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0ISB0058DZ9KLEE0@msgmmp-4.gci.net>; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:48:58 -0900 (AKST) Received: by stargate.akparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id BD2D33F93; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:48:56 -0900 (AKST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:48:41 -0900 From: Beech Rintoul In-reply-to: <43B588E2.4000600@ywave.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200512301248.55329.akbeech@gmail.com> Organization: NorthWind Communications MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1302224.J9nd98VGHI; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20051229220507.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> <20051230003646.Y91381@tripel.monochrome.org> <43B588E2.4000600@ywave.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Micah , FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Mozilla plugins broken after port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:50:09 -0000 --nextPart1302224.J9nd98VGHI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 30 December 2005 10:22 am, Micah wrote: > Chris Hill wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Micah wrote: > >> Chris Hill wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > >>> The specific issues are with acroread7, flash and mplayer-plugin. All > >>> of these worked as plug-ins before the upgrade, but now none of them > >>> do. > > > > [snip] > > > >> Search the list archives for "Flash Plugin in 6.0" and "Flash no > >> longer displayed in Firefox". > > > > Neither of those search terms yields any results, but you've given me > > another direction to look. I searched the archives yet again, this time > > on 'linuxpluginwrapper'. Found > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D751336+0+/usr/local/www/d= b/te > >xt/2005/freebsd-questions/20051120.freebsd-questions > > > > > > ...based on which, I did > > # ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so > > /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ > > > > This fixed things partially. A visit to > > http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/welcome/ > > shows that "regular" flash works, but not shockwave. > > > > Still no luck with PDFs or mplayer-plugin. > > > > Another result from my archive search was > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D1310074+1313109+/usr/loca= l/ww > >w/db/text/2005/freebsd-questions/20051120.freebsd-questions ...which > > revealed the existence of the WITH_PLUGINS make knob for > > linuxpluginwrapper, so I did > > tripel# cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > > tripel# make deinstall > > tripel# make -DWITH_PLUGINS reinstall > > > > ...which resulted in no change. > > > > I'm at a loss regarding the mplayer-plugin stuff. As for Acrobat, I'd > > bet it has something to do with the disappearance of the path > > /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Reader/intellinux/bin, but > > I don't know how that came to exist or why it no longer does. > > > >> It's an issue with the linuxpluginwrapper port, several methods to > >> make it work are described in those recent threads. > > > > Thank you for the pointer, especially for the speed of your post. > > > >> HTH, > >> Micah > > > > It did, a little. Thank you. > > > > But it's still vexing that all this stuff worked fine before, and that > > the upgrade seems to have broken it. I'm also curious why > > "about:plugins" shows, for example, mplayer-plugin installed for a wide > > variety of MIME-types, but trying to access online videos no longer > > starts mplayer-plugin as it did before the upgrade. > > > > My meta-question remains: Is this documented, and if so, where? > > > > -- > > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] > > The mailman search interface is screwed up, and the FreeBSD search > engine and Google haven't indexed recent threads yet. A look through > December's archives would've turned these up. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-December/107922= =2Eh >tml > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-December/107098= =2Eh >tml > =46or acroread make sure you rename /usr/local/bin/acroread7=20 to /usr/local/bin/acroread. Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@gmail.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://akparadise.byethost33.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1302224.J9nd98VGHI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDtatHVq19LUoGB+MRAvWsAJ4kuYYp/8L1MlC+IPvstgvDCXzkwQCfRETe Wqlk3Ie0LvUQQuXBeh+sMyk= =M4CB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1302224.J9nd98VGHI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 21:54:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4376116A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:54:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701B343D46 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:54:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBULs0m7091007; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:54:00 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43B5AC73.4090607@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:53:55 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051221) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= References: <43B5A859.1020605@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: <43B5A859.1020605@t-hosting.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7330A92ECF5C653AEB48E106" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:54:00 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Users unknown in jail, what to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:54:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7330A92ECF5C653AEB48E106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: > mtree: line 6: unknown user root > *** Error code 1 >=20 > I copied passwd, master.passwd, group, nsswitch.conf files, too, but I = > get the same. Could somebody tell me how can I solve this? Try: # pwd_mkdb /etc/master.passwd in your jail. That creates (amongst other things) the hashed .db files t= he getpwent() etc. routines use. Also look at # cap_mkdb login.conf Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig7330A92ECF5C653AEB48E106 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDtax48Mjk52CukIwRA3avAJ9lj9YaUggV552oKXyk/fxfajZ7MwCgjopl qqbstnz+zYvrFyLgH6x8wxA= =j9Bo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7330A92ECF5C653AEB48E106-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 21:55:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B450516A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:55:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514B643D8A for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:55:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from axelds.demon.nl ([83.160.138.74]:11175 helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EsSDG-000Gd6-GY; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:55:02 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" To: =?iso-8859-1?B?J0v2dmVzZOFuIEfhYm9yJw==?= , Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:54:39 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <43B5A859.1020605@t-hosting.hu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Thread-Index: AcYNiTi54DgVmRJEQtqDKoeiKqKwWQAAdf+w Cc: Subject: RE: Users unknown in jail, what to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:55:24 -0000 Hi Gabor,=20 Did you install the jail following the instructions of the man page ? = Which version of FBSD are you running ? Assuming that u are running the jail command from root, you don't have to specify the user.=20 Regards,=20 Ruben=20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of K=F6vesd=E1n = G=E1bor Sent: December 30, 2005 10:36 PM To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Users unknown in jail, what to do? Hello, I've set up a jail and started it with: jail -u root /path/to/jail hostname ip /bin/sh When I tried to install a port inside the jail I got an error message=20 that I don't have the mtree files. I don't know why those files haven't=20 been built but I copied it from the host system to the jail. Now I get: mtree: line 6: unknown user root *** Error code 1 I copied passwd, master.passwd, group, nsswitch.conf files, too, but I=20 get the same. Could somebody tell me how can I solve this? Thanks in advance, Gabor Kovesdan _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: = 12/29/2005 --=20 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: = 12/29/2005 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 22:15:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A354D16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:15:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E410843D46 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:15:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EsSWk-00077U-KT for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:15:10 +0100 Received: from r5bp69.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.75.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:15:10 +0100 Received: from element by r5bp69.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:15:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Pavel Duda Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:14:45 +0100 Lines: 71 Message-ID: References: <20051230201125.44296.qmail@web50515.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5bp69.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20051230201125.44296.qmail@web50515.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Some questions on chmod in FAT hdd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:15:21 -0000 Joao Borges wrote: > > Hello everybody > > > I've finally installed and ran Samba 3 on my FreeBSD > 5.4. Then, wanting to share a directory I applyed on > directory > > drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1638 Dec 30 13:58 shared > > the following command (as root): > > chmod -R a=rwx shared > > It doesn't return error but when I look up the new > atribution it is the same. Indeed this directory is > inside a mounting point which has the same attributes > (ie the mounting operation copies the mounting point > attributtes and then I can't change any attributes > inside the mounting point). By the way the mount is a > msdosfs type. > > Can I deal with this problem? Is it a bug (so I > report) or I am doing some mistake? > Hi, "Non-root file accesses may yield unexpected errors. If the "file system owner" is not equal to the user who is accessing the file system, some programs may generate unusual errors when modifying or creating files. This happens because all files that are created on the MS-DOS FS are implicitly chowned to the file system owner. Work-around: only the user who owns the file system should have write permission for it." ...so if you need to have access under some user then you have to mount it into dir where this user is an owner. It is obvious because MSDOS FS (FAT) doesn't support multiple users. Pavel > I've also performed a Windows XP to FreeBSD transfer > via Network using Samba. The transfer made useless all > the archives involved (some mp3). I shared a full > access share on FreeBSD and then copied and paste on > the XP station the files. Then on FreeBSD they were > useless. Can anybody tell what happened? > > Att > Joao Francisco > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage. > http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 22:33:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432BF16A41F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:33:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9259B43D7E for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:33:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EsSoe-00024g-Mp for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:33:40 +0100 Received: from r5bp69.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.75.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:33:40 +0100 Received: from element by r5bp69.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:33:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Pavel Duda Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:33:22 +0100 Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5bp69.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: Help me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:33:57 -0000 Mohammed Arab wrote: > Hi, > > > > I would like to get some information from you regarding freebsd system, > really is very confuse to know which one is stable system when i went to > site i found many freebsd system one is called stable and another one is > current and release. Can you please explain me on this topic and which one i > have to choice. I am interesting to know everything about this system. > In short : release - is something you want for your production system stable - is something you can use too without much worry - it should be "stable" right ? :-) current - is for brave people who like to spend nights to figure out what the hell is going on with their system and fight with all those mysterious kernel panics.. For start you should use at least stable version, you can always mess up your system by switching to current :-D > Also there is no GUI Graphics on freebsd and why I have manually install > and configure video graphics also. can you help me and give me the > instruction how to setup VGA CARD. > I think that you should start here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ You will find there most answers to your questions and if something goes wrong you can always come here for advice. Welcome to FreeBSD world !!! Pavel > > I am waiting for your reply. > > Thanks, > Mohammed Arab > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 30 23:45:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D02A16A420 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:45:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com (hosting-28.42.rev.fr.colt.net [213.41.42.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A419E43D55 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:45:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hika@bsdmon.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9A1375FE7 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:45:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.bsdmon.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (freefugu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29637-01 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:45:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.bsdmon.com (14.128.101-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.101.128.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.bsdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384B937606C for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:16:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by sdf1.bsdmon.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B71A3B853; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:16:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:16:27 +0100 From: Gilbert Cao To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051230231627.GA15040@bsdmon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE i386 Organization: BSDMon X-GPG-Key: http://www.bsdmon.com/public_key.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdmon.com Subject: One hour offset with smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:45:32 -0000 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I just ran into a small problem with modification time with smbfs : My smb client machine is a FreeBSD 6.0 with GMT+1. My smb server machine is a FreeBSD 5.4 with also GMT+1. I have noticed a one hour offset between a file's modification time when I `ls -l file` from the smb client machine and the same file's modification time when I `ls -l file` from the smb server machine. That file stands in a smb shared directory, on the smb server. More, I have noticed this, only for a datetime like 1st April, 2005. For a datetime like 1st December 2005, the problem does not occur. For example, =66rom the smb client side, I see a modification time of 2005-04-01 00:00:00, and =66rom the smb server side, I see a modification time of 2005-03-31 23:00:00. When I do a `touch -t 200504010000.00 file` from the smb server side, I see 2005-04-01 01:00:00, from the smb client side. When I do a `touch -t 200504010000.00 file` from the smb client side, I see 2005-03-31 23:00:00, from the smb server side. It seems that it is only a matter with summer time. Anyone know if something can be done about this ? I guess the problem is on the smbfs client side ... Thanks in advance. --=20 -------------------------------- (hika) Gilbert Cao http://www.miaouirc.com - MiaouIRC Project 2002-2003 http://www.bsdmon.com - The BSD DMON Power to serve IRC : #miaule at IRCNET Network -------------------------------- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDtb/KSyQfFTqAEpcRAmUhAJ9k91AtS4Hhr90TcJzdP0wU2Q8bJgCfdgGs fKrGtpVsfHWhzaIdgZNcVXw= =albS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 00:37:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120D516A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:37:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@mawer.org) Received: from mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F7543D4C for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:37:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@mawer.org) Received: from c211-30-90-140.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c211-30-246-162.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.246.162]) by mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id jBV0b89J013272 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:37:08 +1100 Received: (qmail 88750 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2005 00:37:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 00:37:08 -0000 Message-ID: <43B5D2AE.2050603@mawer.org> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:37:02 +1100 From: Antony Mawer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gilbert Cao References: <20051230231627.GA15040@bsdmon.com> In-Reply-To: <20051230231627.GA15040@bsdmon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One hour offset with smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:37:12 -0000 On 31/12/2005 10:16 AM, Gilbert Cao wrote: > I just ran into a small problem with modification time with smbfs : > My smb client machine is a FreeBSD 6.0 with GMT+1. > My smb server machine is a FreeBSD 5.4 with also GMT+1. > > I have noticed a one hour offset between a file's modification time when > I `ls -l file` from the smb client machine and the same file's > modification time when I `ls -l file` from the smb server machine. > That file stands in a smb shared directory, on the smb server. > > More, I have noticed this, only for a datetime like 1st April, 2005. > For a datetime like 1st December 2005, the problem does not occur. > > For example, > from the smb client side, I see a modification time of > 2005-04-01 00:00:00, and > from the smb server side, I see a modification time of > 2005-03-31 23:00:00. > > When I do a `touch -t 200504010000.00 file` from the smb server side, > I see 2005-04-01 01:00:00, from the smb client side. > When I do a `touch -t 200504010000.00 file` from the smb client side, > I see 2005-03-31 23:00:00, from the smb server side. > > It seems that it is only a matter with summer time. > > Anyone know if something can be done about this ? > I guess the problem is on the smbfs client side ... This appears to be a problem with smbfs when dealing with timestamps in daylight savings time (or summer time, as you refer to it). I looked into it briefly, and from what I read it seems the kernel is divorced of knowing anything about daylight savings time (only a boolean value indicating whether or not it is currently daylight savings or not is maintained). This means when times from the SMB server are translated, the kernel can't adjust the date/time stamps to compensate for the DST offset, as it doesn't know what the offset is... (not everwhere uses an hour difference for DST) I'd love for someone to correct me and tell me that there's an easy way to fix this issue -- this was just my deduction after a brief look into the matter. Cheers Antony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 01:14:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F71316A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kruptos@mlinux.org) Received: from ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD70A43D45 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:14:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kruptos@mlinux.org) Received: from fnord.quux.edu (103.114.33.65.cfl.res.rr.com [65.33.114.103]) by ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id jBV1EHVq011056 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:14:17 -0500 (EST) From: Kevin Brunelle To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:14:16 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512302014.16627.kruptos@mlinux.org> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Obtaining an @freebsd.org email address. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:14:21 -0000 Does anyone know what the requirements for a freebsd.org email address are? I have looked but I can't seem to find a link to them nor a description of who I would contact concerning this. I have read the following from the porter's handbook ( http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/keeping-up.html ) "If you wish to use FreshPorts, all you need is an account. If your registered email address is @FreeBSD.org, you will see the opt-in link on the right hand side of the webpages. For those of you who already have a FreshPorts account, but are not using your @FreeBSD.org email address, just change your email to @FreeBSD.org, subscribe, then change it back again." This seems to imply that 1) I need an @freebsd.org email address to fully utilize the site 2) I should be able to get an @freebsd.org email address for being a port maintainer. My implications could be wrong so if anyone could point me in the right direction here (for clarification or who I should contact) it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, -Kevin B From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 02:10:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD7F16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from destroyingculture@netspace.net.au) Received: from mail.netspace.net.au (whirlwind.netspace.net.au [203.10.110.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A26F43D45 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:10:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from destroyingculture@netspace.net.au) Received: from nebuchadnezzar (220-253-51-110.VIC.netspace.net.au [220.253.51.110]) by mail.netspace.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B290912F182 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:10:01 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:15:49 +1100 (EST) From: caleb X-X-Sender: caleb@nebuchadnezzar.my.domain To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051231130326.D699@nebuchadnezzar.my.domain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:10:05 -0000 Hi everyone, I have just put together a router/firewall using 5.4 RELEASE and IPFILTER. Everything is working fine except I have to manually flush the NAT table every time the router boots. below is my rc.conf and ipnat.rules, I have used rc.conf to start everything at boot; /* rc.conf */ gateway_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" ifconfig_rl1="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" hostname="tweak" ipfilter_enable="YES" ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf.rules" ipmon_enable="YES" ipmon_flags="-Ds" ipnat_enable="YES" ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="NO" ppp_profile="netspace" ppp_user="root" /* ipnat.rules */ map tun0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 Is there something I am missing? I do not think it is ipf, as I have configured it to allow everything in and out. Could you please CC me if you decide to help. Thankyou, caleb -- There is no spoon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 02:58:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7AB16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:58:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd2mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBD143D46 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:58:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.9]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISC00K9WDLJ6W70@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:58:31 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml8so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.152]) by pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISC00CUVDLJ7700@pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:58:31 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.0.60] ([24.87.209.6]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISC006J4DLIVV20@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:58:31 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:58:12 -0800 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <200512302014.16627.kruptos@mlinux.org> To: Kevin Brunelle Message-id: <43B5F3C4.5090201@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 References: <200512302014.16627.kruptos@mlinux.org> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Obtaining an @freebsd.org email address. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:58:33 -0000 Kevin Brunelle wrote: > Does anyone know what the requirements for a freebsd.org email address are? Except in very unusual circumstances, @freebsd.org email addresses are only available to committers. > I have read the following from the porter's handbook > ( http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/keeping-up.html ) > > "If you wish to use FreshPorts, all you need is an account. If your registered > email address is @FreeBSD.org, you will see the opt-in link on the right hand > side of the webpages. For those of you who already have a FreshPorts account, > but are not using your @FreeBSD.org email address, just change your email to > @FreeBSD.org, subscribe, then change it back again." I have no idea what this quote is trying to say, so I don't think I can clarify it for you. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 03:56:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A6D16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:56:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BFB43D55 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from axelds.demon.nl ([83.160.138.74]:7085 helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EsXqb-000GBx-Vj; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:56:02 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" To: "'caleb'" , Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:55:39 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-reply-to: <20051231130326.D699@nebuchadnezzar.my.domain> Thread-Index: AcYNsPwBdpVnu1/2Rv6gygsNZ42ajwADNiAg Cc: Subject: RE: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:56:04 -0000 Hi Caleb, Add ipfs_enable="YES". Regards, Ruben -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of caleb Sent: December 31, 2005 3:16 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ipnat -CF -f /etc/ipnat.rules Hi everyone, I have just put together a router/firewall using 5.4 RELEASE and IPFILTER. Everything is working fine except I have to manually flush the NAT table every time the router boots. below is my rc.conf and ipnat.rules, I have used rc.conf to start everything at boot; /* rc.conf */ gateway_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" ifconfig_rl1="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" hostname="tweak" ipfilter_enable="YES" ipfilter_rules="/etc/ipf.rules" ipmon_enable="YES" ipmon_flags="-Ds" ipnat_enable="YES" ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="NO" ppp_profile="netspace" ppp_user="root" /* ipnat.rules */ map tun0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 Is there something I am missing? I do not think it is ipf, as I have configured it to allow everything in and out. Could you please CC me if you decide to help. Thankyou, caleb -- There is no spoon _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: 12/29/2005 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: 12/29/2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 04:12:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1FA16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488CD43DAF for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:12:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from palle.girgensohn.se ([85.226.194.222] [85.226.194.222]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20051231041209.LFJT4422.mxfep01.bredband.com@palle.girgensohn.se> for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:12:09 +0100 Received: from palle.girgensohn.se (palle.girgensohn.se [127.0.0.1]) by palle.girgensohn.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EF017845 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:11:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:11:38 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <36777FA54324EA865B92F606@palle.girgensohn.se> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: rpc.lockd snatches all priviledged udp ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:12:52 -0000 Hi, An NFS server running FreeBSD 4.10 sometimes have the problem that all UDP ports below 1024 are used by rpc.lockd. This is not a high load server, really, it serves and handful workstations and should really cope. Is it so that rpc.lockd needs a port for each file, or else what is happening? I found a discussion on -current from Jan 2004 about this, but I couldn't find that the problem was acutually solved? Seems to be a problem with rebooting clients? BTW, can I easily "flush" the lock daemon to get some ports back? It seems hard to restart the lock daemon - I once tried but gave up and ended up rebooting the system. There must be a better way? Anyone knows if this is fixed in 6.0? thx Palle From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 04:32:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CF416A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:32:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DC943D45 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:31:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AEF1A3C1D; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:31:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A7919511CB; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:31:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:31:58 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: guru@Sisis.de Message-ID: <20051231043158.GA66216@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229145814.GA19261@flame.pc> <20051229150959.GA10620@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051229161025.GA13296@rebelion.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:32:00 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 05:10:25PM +0100, guru@Sisis.de wrote: > My point was that I don't have a fast Internet link at home to fetch all > the (new) sources for the distfiles and I was looking for distfiles on > CD which match exactly the 6.0-REL ports collection requirements; Since the full set of distfiles is something like 15GB, hoping for a CD that contains them is .. ambitious :-) Kris --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDtgm+Wry0BWjoQKURAnvMAJ0b74IzGLUPokAxh27GxQ9xhZmPfACfUNLK DYAVPHv3YNCAuZ9vp4jzsEw= =GARQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 04:32:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FEB16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:32:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F10D43D5D for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:32:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1189F1A3C1C; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:32:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 63F40511CB; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:32:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:32:52 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jon Brisbin Message-ID: <20051231043252.GB66216@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1135894186.1249.10.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1135894186.1249.10.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD Qs Subject: Re: I just can't find GCJ on my FreeBSD 6 box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:32:54 -0000 --WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 04:09:46PM -0600, Jon Brisbin wrote: > I installed GCC 4.1 twice, thinking I just missed it. I can't find any > of the gcj tools on my BSD 6 box. I made extra double sure that Java was > compiled into GCC, but the gcj tools are nowhere to be found. >=20 > Am I doing something wrong? I'm trying to follow the instructions here: >=20 > http://developer.classpath.org/mediation/ClasspathShowcase#head-7d9a556e8= 485fc84fd5ce0e52be6104d85e24316 >=20 > I have this in 4.1 on my PowerBook, but I can't find the darn thing on > BSD. Where is it? How can I use gcj on BSD? Can I? Look at the port makefile..you might need to enable it specifically, or maybe it is disabled in that release. Kris --WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDtgn0Wry0BWjoQKURAqw3AJ9mmuzf6bgUMIYSJg6Fp7wLp2E8DACeN6+o FHyi2wzJx/XrpYarIunQ4ZQ= =2Mjl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 04:34:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3028E16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:34:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB6F43D60 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:34:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B623C1A3C1D; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:34:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D5745119E; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:34:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:34:48 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kiffin Gish Message-ID: <20051231043448.GC66216@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1135855260.1034.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1135855260.1034.5.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:34:50 -0000 --O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 12:21:00PM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote: > I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 6.0 and noticed the introduction of > option SCHED_ULE for supporting multi-processor environments. >=20 > However, I understood that using SCHED_ULE with only one CPU can also > improve performance significantly. >=20 > Is this true, and if so, what are the risks involved dropping good old > SCHED_4BSD for the new-and-improved scheduler? The risks are that you system will perform 10-20% slower under load, and may sometimes panic or spontaneously reboot. In other words: ULE is not production-ready. This may of course change at a later date. Kris --O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDtgpnWry0BWjoQKURAiEtAJwLdAX3EOSyk85Aiq34llyWH5t43ACfcAxr pprmuu3N0oEZCMZFBmnVuUs= =cMTv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --O3RTKUHj+75w1tg5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 04:44:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3F116A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:44:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13C343D73 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:44:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o60so247816nfa for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:44:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cKT5/T2MvG4lT946R9dEBgLU7dEszzK+JoUlwE9rJIPGiZ1/nHN6viOcRVCW+0lkYLoEZKpt1bF8Tipqa8ey5szyZ6kelZ1H/iIR3QxFEDg1yBIjzkTedefM5QVMKQhy9RkgU2vc07cbm6tnZm0N1YkULzrJp6Aod2VdGnAsRCQ= Received: by 10.48.3.13 with SMTP id 13mr434242nfc; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:44:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.12 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:44:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550512302044g40006726nb165cc658b5c6ff3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:44:07 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550512302042jfa3231at5daf149e804a0a56@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200512302014.16627.kruptos@mlinux.org> <43B5F3C4.5090201@freebsd.org> <5ceb5d550512302042jfa3231at5daf149e804a0a56@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Obtaining an @freebsd.org email address. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:44:14 -0000 *Tongue in cheek* Maybe you're supposed to register using questions@freebsd.org so everyone knows your password? On 12/31/05, Colin Percival wrote: > Kevin Brunelle wrote: > > Does anyone know what the requirements for a freebsd.org email address = are? > > Except in very unusual circumstances, @freebsd.org email addresses are > only available to committers. > > > I have read the following from the porter's handbook > > ( http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/kee= ping-up.html ) > > > > "If you wish to use FreshPorts, all you need is an account. If your reg= istered > > email address is @FreeBSD.org, you will see the opt-in link on the righ= t hand > > side of the webpages. For those of you who already have a FreshPorts ac= count, > > but are not using your @FreeBSD.org email address, just change your ema= il to > > @FreeBSD.org, subscribe, then change it back again." > > I have no idea what this quote is trying to say, so I don't think I > can clarify it for you. > > Colin Percival > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 04:56:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A762E16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:56:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from forrie.com (c-24-147-44-26.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [24.147.44.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3D643D45 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:56:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from [192.168.1.98] (monster.forrie.com [192.168.1.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by forrie.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBV4uo2e074515 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:56:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Message-ID: <43B60F8B.6040602@forrie.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:56:43 -0500 From: Forrest Aldrich User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1219/Wed Dec 28 17:57:59 2005 on forrie.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Linksys PAP2 with FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:56:51 -0000 Anyone here use the PAP2 on FreeBSD.. perhaps with isc-dhcpd. I plug it in and, despite whatever I configure it to be, it wants to take over the RFC LAN (systems stop routing/responding). I'm gonna continue cracking away at it, but figured I'd ask if someone has seen this problem, etc. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 05:02:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE62216A41F; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:02:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E4143D5F; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:02:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C351A3C1A; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:02:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D478513FB; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:02:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:02:06 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Daniel A." Message-ID: <20051231050206.GA66589@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200512302014.16627.kruptos@mlinux.org> <43B5F3C4.5090201@freebsd.org> <5ceb5d550512302042jfa3231at5daf149e804a0a56@mail.gmail.com> <5ceb5d550512302044g40006726nb165cc658b5c6ff3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550512302044g40006726nb165cc658b5c6ff3@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, cperciva@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Obtaining an @freebsd.org email address. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:02:08 -0000 --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:44:07AM +0100, Daniel A. wrote: > > > "If you wish to use FreshPorts, all you need is an account. If your registered > > > email address is @FreeBSD.org, you will see the opt-in link on the right hand > > > side of the webpages. For those of you who already have a FreshPorts account, > > > but are not using your @FreeBSD.org email address, just change your email to > > > @FreeBSD.org, subscribe, then change it back again." > > > > I have no idea what this quote is trying to say, so I don't think I > > can clarify it for you. The text is directed towards people with freebsd.org accounts, i.e. committers, for whom special features (syntax checking feedback for port commits) are available from freshports. Kris --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDthDNWry0BWjoQKURArdUAKDLioQPxY0cZr62fRXqbrU7pc4W5wCdFrq/ suJacT2ivm1PgjnrdO/HfZ4= =Pamt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 05:04:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27DA16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:04:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6C643D46 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:04:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080BC1A3C1A; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5F4BA513A2; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:04:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:04:21 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Angel Blazquez Message-ID: <20051231050421.GA66671@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs server overload (nfsd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:04:22 -0000 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:19:10AM +0100, Angel Blazquez wrote: > Hello, >=20 > We are expecting incredible overload in a NFS server. A top shows nfsd > consuming most of the CPU: >=20 > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COM= MAND > 6000 root -8 0 1204K 660K biord 1 124:15 27.88% 27.88% nf= sd > 6002 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 124:18 17.58% 17.58% nf= sd > 6006 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:38 10.21% 10.21% nf= sd > 6005 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:36 7.47% 7.47% nf= sd > 6003 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:08 4.15% 4.15% nf= sd > 6001 root 4 0 1204K 660K *Giant 0 123:16 2.83% 2.83% nf= sd >=20 > Memory looks fine: >=20 > Mem: 27M Active, 910M Inact, 136M Wired, 51M Cache, 112M Buf, 1828K Free > Swap: 2048M Total, 72K Used, 2048M Free >=20 > Typing in the nfs server (console/ssh) becomes terrible, the server does > not reply well. >=20 > We are running this nfs server in FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 on a Compaq > Proliant server with a Compaq Smart Array 5300 that comunicates with a > array of disks: You will experience *much* better performance if you upgrade to 6.0. Kris --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDthFUWry0BWjoQKURAguGAJ9PP+YaF6A0sXAbjldUDCaT4Zn8tgCdHD57 EXNcIMsutK3YjBln1m+MOfQ= =0i6l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 05:06:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D56116A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:06:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D76D43D5D for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:06:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33617DE1 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:06:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Free BSD Questions list Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:06:06 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d doesn't run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:06:09 -0000 I have one script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d that doesn't run. Any ideas why? It is marked as executable ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 441B Dec 30 20:36 start-program.sh The script is just: #!/bin/sh log="/var/log/program.log" echo ----------------->>$log /bin/date >>$log echo Entering program.sh >>$log case "$1" in start) echo Starting program echo ================= >>$log echo Starting program >>$log /home/root/bin/archivec.pl >> $log echo beyond program call >> $log ;; stop) echo No Stopping procedure yet ;; *) echo Need parameter echo Valid parameter: start ;; esac A couple of times the log was written to.. although the script was not run.. but afterwards not even the log was changed.. as if the program did not get run at all. Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 05:07:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B4D16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu) Received: from mail.hwi.buffalo.edu (mail.hwi.buffalo.edu [128.205.165.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8162F43D67 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:07:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu) Received: (qmail 47809 invoked by uid 90); 31 Dec 2005 00:07:41 -0500 Received: from 10.1.55.4 by cliff.hwi.buffalo.edu (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. Clear:RC:1(10.1.55.4):. Processed in 0.094023 secs); 31 Dec 2005 05:07:41 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu via cliff.hwi.buffalo.edu X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(10.1.55.4):. Processed in 0.094023 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO Infernus) (10.1.55.4) by mail.hwi.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 00:07:40 -0500 Message-ID: <003d01c60dc8$2090f930$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> From: "Robert Collins" To: Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:07:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: forwarding http requests with ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:07:43 -0000 I've got a situation where I've got an internal host using a private ip/domainname. Let's say for the sake of this discussion the host is privatehost.internal.freebsd.org. privatehost isn't running a webserver. But I would like machines on the internal.freebsd.org network to query privatehost as if it was. When one of these machines queries privatehost I would like privatehost to forward those requests to my webserver, www.freebsd.org, so that it can handle the request. In order to accomplish that I have done the following: My kernel was compiled with these options: options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED "ipfw list" looks like this: 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00120 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 10000 fwd 216.136.204.117 tcp from any to me dst-port 80 65000 allow ip from any to any 65535 deny ip from any to any The problem I am having is that it seems the packets never leave privatehost. tcpdump shows packets coming in destined for port 80. "ipfw show" shows that packets are matching my rule, but tcpdump never shows any packets going out to 216.136.204.117. tcpdump on 216.136.204.117 also shows that no packets are being recieved. I did a tcpdump on lo0 just for kicks, and that didn't show anything. It seems as if the packets are just disappearing. Someone on #freebsdhelp suggested doing a "sysctl -w net.inet.ip.forwarding=1" but that didn't help the situation. Is there something minor I'm missing here...or am I totally off in my understanding of how "ipfw fwd" works? Thanks -rcollins From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 05:11:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DF016A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:11:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE13043D5C for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:11:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 24845 invoked by uid 502); 31 Dec 2005 05:11:35 -0000 Received: from dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@12.178.97.72) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 05:11:35 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 12.178.97.72 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl-12-178-97-72.ywave.com Message-ID: <43B61306.3090006@ywave.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:11:34 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Brisbin References: <1135894186.1249.10.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> In-Reply-To: <1135894186.1249.10.camel@fc63r41.npci.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Qs Subject: Re: I just can't find GCJ on my FreeBSD 6 box X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:11:37 -0000 Jon Brisbin wrote: > I installed GCC 4.1 twice, thinking I just missed it. I can't find any > of the gcj tools on my BSD 6 box. I made extra double sure that Java was > compiled into GCC, but the gcj tools are nowhere to be found. > > Am I doing something wrong? I'm trying to follow the instructions here: > > http://developer.classpath.org/mediation/ClasspathShowcase#head-7d9a556e8485fc84fd5ce0e52be6104d85e24316 > > I have this in 4.1 on my PowerBook, but I can't find the darn thing on > BSD. Where is it? How can I use gcj on BSD? Can I? > > Thanks! > > Jon Brisbin > Webmaster > NPC International, Inc. > From Makefile: # FIXME: As of 20051202, installing libgcj nearly kills 1GB machines. WITHOUT_JAVA= yes In other words java has been disabled until they fix it. You can try commenting the line out, but I'm not sure I'd want to "nearly kill" my machine. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 05:23:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCD516A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:23:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2268543D5A for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:23:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o60so248967nfa for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:23:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bxAXZnPce+IOyPiZVQgVeGDvSJfTbmXVJm5cF0jdd3tkx/SSvZuSuxTZdBKLUI9oFvgZ5yeAE+JejLWBCXM3geAdi/cCMyiYEP6IiIwYYv3ehF9vXBKw5oQyZzVhOwfF4K0wg2RQjuWVD020G9L6qhFM0KwxdxOTZij+2jgsJ+U= Received: by 10.48.245.12 with SMTP id s12mr435149nfh; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:23:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.12 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:23:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550512302123v691619e2me120853f2e591691@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:23:32 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: Pavel Duda In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:23:34 -0000 Isn't "stable" supposed to mean that it's "feature-stable", as in "We've discontinued implementing new features to this kernel, and are fixing bugs"? On 12/30/05, Pavel Duda wrote: > Mohammed Arab wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I would like to get some information from you regarding freebsd syste= m, > > really is very confuse to know which one is stable system when i went t= o > > site i found many freebsd system one is called stable and another one i= s > > current and release. Can you please explain me on this topic and which = one i > > have to choice. I am interesting to know everything about this system. > > > > In short : > release - is something you want for your production system > stable - is something you can use too without much worry - it should be > "stable" right ? :-) > current - is for brave people who like to spend nights to figure out > what the hell is going on with their system and fight with all those > mysterious kernel panics.. > > For start you should use at least stable version, you can always mess up > your system by switching to current :-D > > > > Also there is no GUI Graphics on freebsd and why I have manually instal= l > > and configure video graphics also. can you help me and give me the > > instruction how to setup VGA CARD. > > > > I think that you should start here: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ > You will find there most answers to your questions and if something goes > wrong you can always come here for advice. > > > Welcome to FreeBSD world !!! > > Pavel > > > > > I am waiting for your reply. > > > > Thanks, > > Mohammed Arab > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 05:51:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E91A16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:51:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5653F43D48 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:51:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (morr062.gti.net [208.216.122.2]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id BF4D035A63 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:48:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B61C95.1060801@gti.net> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:52:21 -0500 From: "Robert H. Perry" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051223) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Need Assistance Upgrading Ethereal-0.10.13_3 to 0.10.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:51:56 -0000 FreeBSD sphinx.my.domain 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Ran into the following error while running portupgrade on ethereal: ==> applying extra patch /usr/ports/net/ethereal/files/extra-patch-capture_loop.c ***Error code 1 Stop in usr/ports/net/ethereal. Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade43330.26 make ** Fix the problem and try again. The recommendation "Fix the problem and try again." seems relatively straightforward, however... Is this an error I should know how to easily fix? Please advise. Thnx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 06:13:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD90216A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:13:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA4B43D53 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:13:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-91-227-82.san.res.rr.com [66.91.227.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBV6DkEs019149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:13:47 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051230215226.03679d60@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:07:59 -0800 To: "Robert Collins" , From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <003d01c60dc8$2090f930$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> References: <003d01c60dc8$2090f930$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: forwarding http requests with ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:13:48 -0000 At 09:07 PM 12/30/2005, Robert Collins wrote: >I've got a situation where I've got an internal host using a private >ip/domainname. Let's say for the sake of this discussion the host is >privatehost.internal.freebsd.org. privatehost isn't running a >webserver. But I would like machines on the internal.freebsd.org >network to query privatehost as if it was. When one of these >machines queries privatehost I would like privatehost to forward >those requests to my webserver, www.freebsd.org, so that it can >handle the request. In order to accomplish that I have done the following: > >My kernel was compiled with these options: >options IPFIREWALL >options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD >options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED > > >"ipfw list" looks like this: >00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 >00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >00120 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >10000 fwd 216.136.204.117 tcp from any to me dst-port 80 >65000 allow ip from any to any >65535 deny ip from any to any > >The problem I am having is that it seems the packets never leave >privatehost. tcpdump shows packets coming in destined for port 80. >"ipfw show" shows that packets are matching my rule, but tcpdump >never shows any packets going out to 216.136.204.117. tcpdump on >216.136.204.117 also shows that no packets are being recieved. I >did a tcpdump on lo0 just for kicks, and that didn't show anything. >It seems as if the packets are just disappearing. Someone on >#freebsdhelp suggested doing a "sysctl -w net.inet.ip.forwarding=1" >but that didn't help the situation. Is there something minor I'm >missing here...or am I totally off in my understanding of how "ipfw fwd" works? To quote the ipfw man page: "The fwd action does not change the contents of the packet at all. In particular, the destination address remains unmodified, so packets forwarded to another system will usually be rejected by that system unless there is a matching rule on that system to capture them." You probably need to re-think what you are trying to do. -Glenn >Thanks >-rcollins >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 06:33:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BDA16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:33:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (ns1.ecoms.com [207.44.130.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2A543D5A for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:33:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (localhost.roq.com [127.0.0.1]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1834CFBE; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:34:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ppp157-158.static.internode.on.net [150.101.157.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BC24CF8A; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:34:00 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <43B6264A.7040001@roq.com> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:33:46 +1100 From: Michael Vince User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Daniel A." References: <20051224081054.29659.qmail@web31304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5ceb5d550512240654g6c44388medb95cc31f723fcf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550512240654g6c44388medb95cc31f723fcf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Andy Sjostrom Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:33:49 -0000 If you want to try an different Desktop replacement OS over Windows XP I would say you would have better luck with something like Linspire. But the truth is there isn't much difference at all between any Linux distribution or FreeBSD and when I see the latest Linux review on some of those so called professional OS review sites I sometimes laugh my ass off, heres why. Firstly they give you screen shots of the latest KDE, this always makes chuckle since KDE is KDE, its the same on any OS even in Windows XP, why bother doing it at all, it just shows that these reviews aren't reviews of the OS at all rather then just reviewing free software you can install on anything. Then they show you screen shots of other things such as Gaim, and various multimedia players, OpenOffice etc, all of them that do work in FreeBSD as well. When you review an OS thats built on OTHER peoples free software you don't really have much to show at all. Normally the only differences are the installer / configurator and the package management system. It could be RPM, debian or gentoo based. Or some other system thats ultimately just as a tarball with a few text files in them to allow you to know what it is and its dependencies. These are the only things that most open source based OS's have to show thats any different, and the day I see an "OS" review that just shows you there package management system and there installer/configurator then I know why are looking at a proper free software OS review. I use FreeBSD as my desktop on my Laptop as its best for me because I connect to a lot of Unix boxes via ssh, and to me when you spend a lot of time dealing with Unix servers then the best way to deal with them is via Unix its self. (BTW when I say Unix I mean it in the generic way just like Apple and most non-lost people do. http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/06/11/2231244&tid=130&tid=3 ) The reason I use FreeBSD as my desktop is that I believe I have the most flexibility via cvsup and ports, but this comes at the cost of more manual configuration. I can install/upgrade the latest KDE with a simple command like below, and I can also easily deal with any problems it puts in front of me, but others can't, this would be the biggest problem for new users. portupgrade -N /usr/ports/x11/kde3 If you not comfortable with that then you need something more auto magic like Linspire but face the fact you might not have an easy upgrade path or even have one at all. I enjoy using the latest versions of all the free software that is available to a free OS such as FreeBSD or Linux and don't like being stuck on old versions. Windows XP is the result of years of investment (billion $) and work at MS and you dont hear people complain about it nearly as much as older versions of Windows, this is due to a variety of reasons from the need for high end hardware vs stable OS. You can even download white papers/benchmarks from MS saying how it takes 10million CPU cycles to load a single simple process over it taking 900,000 CPU cycles on FreeBSD and 2million in Linux and MS will explain to you why their OS is better then the others in every way but its always up to you. Mike Daniel A. wrote: >Hi Andy, > >I am sorry for the trouble you have had with Windows XP. > >I suggest that you use Linux, as FreeBSD really is not targeted at >people who want to use graphical user interfaces. >The linux developers really have been trying to make a valuable >replacement for Windows, as they somehow have experienced the same >issues with Windows (And Microsoft products in general) that you have. > >One Linux distribution in particular that I think you might like, is >Ubuntu. You can download it at http://www.ubuntulinux.org/, or order a >CD (Free shipping, free CD, you pay nothing). > > >On 12/24/05, Andy Sjostrom wrote: > > >>To whom this may concern, >>H-E-L-P! >>LOL! >> I've been online since 1992( the windows 3.1 days for me.) I'm 48 yrs.old. and also a windows XP >>user. >> Because of recent issue I have had with Mr. William Gates and his product. >>about every 6 months I have had to overhaul my windows XP. during the last up grade I was told >>that my XP product code was invaild, then when is made the repair up grades something in my >>registory changed, and when that auto updater downloaded the new security patches it somehow >>downloaded 2969 trojans as well. >> >> I have decided to start the search for a new OS. >>In my case the new OS must be completely 100 percent user friendly. >>Please bare in mind that 100 percent means "NO CODE" writting. I'm not a programer...LOL! >> I run a very small one man company at, >>http://www.geocities.com/andy_sjostrom/index.html >> >> From time to time I also like to rip and burn a CD as well, >>Publish articles to my yahoo 360 blog. edit a few images from time to to time. >> surf the net, copy and paste, chat with friends in my favorite yahoo chat room. >> fold protiens for the fold@home project at stanford U. >>(I'm on team #40154.) >> I also have a logitech Clicksmart420 that the new OS must be willing to accept. >>I've been doing some reading and every thing I have been able to find for OS's boils down to three >>basic choices. >>BSD >>Unix >>Linux >>A windows Hybird like ReactOS. >> >>There is one other very important thing Because I'm on a fixed income and things with me are very >>tight money wise the new OS must be free. >> Is there any thing you can do to help me. Such as point me in the right direction. >> >> >> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 06:35:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA27816A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:35:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu) Received: from mail.hwi.buffalo.edu (mail.hwi.buffalo.edu [128.205.165.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC39543D55 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:35:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu) Received: (qmail 2596 invoked by uid 90); 31 Dec 2005 01:35:00 -0500 Received: from 10.1.55.4 by cliff.hwi.buffalo.edu (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. Clear:RC:1(10.1.55.4):. Processed in 0.168806 secs); 31 Dec 2005 06:35:00 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu via cliff.hwi.buffalo.edu X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(10.1.55.4):. Processed in 0.168806 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO Infernus) (10.1.55.4) by mail.hwi.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 01:34:59 -0500 Message-ID: <006601c60dd4$5319b7a0$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <003d01c60dc8$2090f930$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20051230215226.03679d60@cobalt.antimatter.net> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:34:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: forwarding http requests with ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:35:02 -0000 > At 09:07 PM 12/30/2005, Robert Collins wrote: >>I've got a situation where I've got an internal host using a private >>ip/domainname. Let's say for the sake of this discussion the host is >>privatehost.internal.freebsd.org. privatehost isn't running a webserver. >>But I would like machines on the internal.freebsd.org network to query >>privatehost as if it was. When one of these machines queries privatehost I >>would like privatehost to forward those requests to my webserver, >>www.freebsd.org, so that it can handle the request. In order to accomplish >>that I have done the following: >> >>My kernel was compiled with these options: >>options IPFIREWALL >>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD >>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED >> >> >>"ipfw list" looks like this: >>00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 >>00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >>00120 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >>10000 fwd 216.136.204.117 tcp from any to me dst-port 80 >>65000 allow ip from any to any >>65535 deny ip from any to any >> >>The problem I am having is that it seems the packets never leave >>privatehost. tcpdump shows packets coming in destined for port 80. "ipfw >>show" shows that packets are matching my rule, but tcpdump never shows any >>packets going out to 216.136.204.117. tcpdump on 216.136.204.117 also >>shows that no packets are being recieved. I did a tcpdump on lo0 just for >>kicks, and that didn't show anything. It seems as if the packets are just >>disappearing. Someone on #freebsdhelp suggested doing a "sysctl -w >>net.inet.ip.forwarding=1" but that didn't help the situation. Is there >>something minor I'm missing here...or am I totally off in my understanding >>of how "ipfw fwd" works? > > To quote the ipfw man page: > > "The fwd action does not change the contents of the packet at all. In > particular, the destination address remains unmodified, so packets > forwarded to another system will usually be rejected by that system unless > there is a matching rule on that system to capture them." > > You probably need to re-think what you are trying to do. My understanding of this portion of the man page is that the machine receiving the packet, in this case www.freebsd.org, needs to be prepared to recive a packet whose destination address is not it's own. If I am correct in my interpretation then this part of the man page is irrelivent to my problem. My question is not, why is www.freebsd.org not receiving the packet. My question is, why is privatehost.internal.freebsd.org not sending the packet. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 06:52:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB37A16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:52:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F1543D77 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:52:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-91-227-82.san.res.rr.com [66.91.227.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBV6qCRT019796 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:52:12 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051230223713.05d19280@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:46:24 -0800 To: "Robert Collins" , From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <006601c60dd4$5319b7a0$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> References: <003d01c60dc8$2090f930$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20051230215226.03679d60@cobalt.antimatter.net> <006601c60dd4$5319b7a0$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: forwarding http requests with ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:52:22 -0000 At 10:34 PM 12/30/2005, Robert Collins wrote: >>At 09:07 PM 12/30/2005, Robert Collins wrote: >>>I've got a situation where I've got an internal host using a >>>private ip/domainname. Let's say for the sake of this discussion >>>the host is privatehost.internal.freebsd.org. privatehost isn't >>>running a webserver. But I would like machines on the >>>internal.freebsd.org network to query privatehost as if it was. >>>When one of these machines queries privatehost I would like >>>privatehost to forward those requests to my webserver, >>>www.freebsd.org, so that it can handle the request. In order to >>>accomplish that I have done the following: >>> >>>My kernel was compiled with these options: >>>options IPFIREWALL >>>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD >>>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED >>> >>> >>>"ipfw list" looks like this: >>>00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 >>>00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >>>00120 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >>>10000 fwd 216.136.204.117 tcp from any to me dst-port 80 >>>65000 allow ip from any to any >>>65535 deny ip from any to any >>> >>>The problem I am having is that it seems the packets never leave >>>privatehost. tcpdump shows packets coming in destined for port 80. >>>"ipfw show" shows that packets are matching my rule, but tcpdump >>>never shows any packets going out to 216.136.204.117. tcpdump on >>>216.136.204.117 also shows that no packets are being recieved. I >>>did a tcpdump on lo0 just for kicks, and that didn't show >>>anything. It seems as if the packets are just disappearing. >>>Someone on #freebsdhelp suggested doing a "sysctl -w >>>net.inet.ip.forwarding=1" but that didn't help the situation. Is >>>there something minor I'm missing here...or am I totally off in my >>>understanding of how "ipfw fwd" works? >> >>To quote the ipfw man page: >> >>"The fwd action does not change the contents of the packet at >>all. In particular, the destination address remains unmodified, so >>packets forwarded to another system will usually be rejected by >>that system unless there is a matching rule on that system to capture them." >> >>You probably need to re-think what you are trying to do. > >My understanding of this portion of the man page is that the machine >receiving the packet, in this case www.freebsd.org, needs to be >prepared to recive a packet whose destination address is not it's >own. If I am correct in my interpretation then this part of the man >page is irrelivent to my problem. My question is not, why is >www.freebsd.org not receiving the packet. My question is, why is >privatehost.internal.freebsd.org not sending the packet. What tcpdump rules are you using to look for packets leaving "privatehost"? Same question for packets arriving at 216.136.204.117? -Glenn >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 07:04:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711DA16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:04:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E0743D55 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA07661; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:02:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma007653; Sat, 31 Dec 05 08:02:00 +0100 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (torwart.Sisis.de [193.31.10.94]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA10454; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:04:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBV74BOm002541; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:04:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:04:11 +0100 To: Kent Stewart Message-ID: <20051231070411.GA1189@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20051230103942.GB9413@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200512301217.50044.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200512301217.50044.kstewart@owt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (i386) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && ports/devel/subversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:04:31 -0000 El día Friday, December 30, 2005 a las 12:17:49PM -0800, Kent Stewart escribió: > On Friday 30 December 2005 02:39 am, guru@sisis.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the ports compilation of subversion-1.2.1 failes with: > > > > subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:32:23: ne_socket.h: No such file or > > directory subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:33:24: ne_request.h: No > > such file or directory subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:34:22: > > ne_props.h: No such file or directory > > subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:35:22: ne_basic.h: No such file or > > directory > > > > > > it seems that the missing header files are part of > > ports/www/neon/ but don't get installed; > > > > what is the right way to fix this? > > Thx > > > > Were you using portupgrade or portmanage? They are supposed to > automagically take care of problems like that. > > Sometimes, even if you use them, the build doesn't happen but if you > look at the configure messages, you will see it is missing. Since it is > in the dependancy list, I would just build neon and try building > subversion again. > > I first would try updating subversion with one of the tools and see if > it is fixed for you. I deinstalled ports/www/neon/ and installed it again; now it placed the header files and the ports/devel/subversion went fine; I don't know why it did not automatically in the process started by 'make install' in ports/x11/kde :-(( I had one or two PANIC's during the makes and while I was copying over my homeland from the older notebook, maybe the later fsck removed the just installed header files; with the PANIC's I still have to work out, what's going on; I can now reproduce them by: - booting into normal runlevel - login as root and than # kldload kqemu # kldstat # su - user --> PANIC Any hints on that? > "Nunca te acostarás sin saber una cosa más" > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html off-topic: Tu frase de firma me llamó la atención :-) Tengo otra en castellano también y unas páginas pa' ti http://www.sisis.de/~guru/Espanol/list.html matthias -- http://www.sisis.de/~guru/ «Hace falta una carga para matar bribones, para acabar la obra de las revoluciones.» [del poema Mensaje Lírico Civil, Rubén Martínez Villena] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 07:25:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DCD16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:25:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu) Received: from mail.hwi.buffalo.edu (mail.hwi.buffalo.edu [128.205.165.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B35F43D5E for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:25:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu) Received: (qmail 92549 invoked by uid 90); 31 Dec 2005 02:25:30 -0500 Received: from 10.1.55.4 by cliff.hwi.buffalo.edu (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. Clear:RC:1(10.1.55.4):. Processed in 0.203763 secs); 31 Dec 2005 07:25:30 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu via cliff.hwi.buffalo.edu X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(10.1.55.4):. Processed in 0.203763 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO Infernus) (10.1.55.4) by mail.hwi.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 02:25:30 -0500 Message-ID: <006c01c60ddb$6167cf70$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <003d01c60dc8$2090f930$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20051230215226.03679d60@cobalt.antimatter.net> <006601c60dd4$5319b7a0$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20051230223713.05d19280@cobalt.antimatter.net> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:25:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: forwarding http requests with ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:25:32 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Dawson" To: "Robert Collins" ; Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 1:46 AM Subject: Re: forwarding http requests with ipfw > At 10:34 PM 12/30/2005, Robert Collins wrote: >>>At 09:07 PM 12/30/2005, Robert Collins wrote: >>>>I've got a situation where I've got an internal host using a private >>>>ip/domainname. Let's say for the sake of this discussion the host is >>>>privatehost.internal.freebsd.org. privatehost isn't running a webserver. >>>>But I would like machines on the internal.freebsd.org network to query >>>>privatehost as if it was. When one of these machines queries privatehost >>>>I would like privatehost to forward those requests to my webserver, >>>>www.freebsd.org, so that it can handle the request. In order to >>>>accomplish that I have done the following: >>>> >>>>My kernel was compiled with these options: >>>>options IPFIREWALL >>>>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD >>>>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED >>>> >>>> >>>>"ipfw list" looks like this: >>>>00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 >>>>00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >>>>00120 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >>>>10000 fwd 216.136.204.117 tcp from any to me dst-port 80 >>>>65000 allow ip from any to any >>>>65535 deny ip from any to any >>>> >>>>The problem I am having is that it seems the packets never leave >>>>privatehost. tcpdump shows packets coming in destined for port 80. "ipfw >>>>show" shows that packets are matching my rule, but tcpdump never shows >>>>any packets going out to 216.136.204.117. tcpdump on 216.136.204.117 >>>>also shows that no packets are being recieved. I did a tcpdump on lo0 >>>>just for kicks, and that didn't show anything. It seems as if the >>>>packets are just disappearing. Someone on #freebsdhelp suggested doing a >>>>"sysctl -w net.inet.ip.forwarding=1" but that didn't help the situation. >>>>Is there something minor I'm missing here...or am I totally off in my >>>>understanding of how "ipfw fwd" works? >>> >>>To quote the ipfw man page: >>> >>>"The fwd action does not change the contents of the packet at all. In >>>particular, the destination address remains unmodified, so packets >>>forwarded to another system will usually be rejected by that system >>>unless there is a matching rule on that system to capture them." >>> >>>You probably need to re-think what you are trying to do. >> >>My understanding of this portion of the man page is that the machine >>receiving the packet, in this case www.freebsd.org, needs to be prepared >>to recive a packet whose destination address is not it's own. If I am >>correct in my interpretation then this part of the man page is irrelivent >>to my problem. My question is not, why is www.freebsd.org not receiving >>the packet. My question is, why is privatehost.internal.freebsd.org not >>sending the packet. > > What tcpdump rules are you using to look for packets leaving > "privatehost"? Same question for packets arriving at 216.136.204.117? > On both machines I tried "tcpdump -n port 80". "privatehost" says: 02:15:32.542383 IP 10.1.35.10.1732 > 10.1.35.72.80: S 2200576146:2200576146(0) win 65535 There is no output for 216.136.204.117. I've also tried " tcpdump -n host 216.136.204.117" on privatehost. That rule doesn't produce any output. -rcollins From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 07:33:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B7F16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:33:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5683E43D4C for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:33:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBV7Wax4028690; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:32:36 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, guru@sisis.de Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:33:21 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051230103942.GB9413@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200512301217.50044.kstewart@owt.com> <20051231070411.GA1189@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20051231070411.GA1189@rebelion.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512302333.21525.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && ports/devel/subversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:33:26 -0000 On Friday 30 December 2005 11:04 pm, guru@sisis.de wrote: > El d=EDa Friday, December 30, 2005 a las 12:17:49PM -0800, Kent Stewart=20 escribi=F3: > > On Friday 30 December 2005 02:39 am, guru@sisis.de wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > the ports compilation of subversion-1.2.1 failes with: > > > > > > subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:32:23: ne_socket.h: No such > > > file or directory subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:33:24: > > > ne_request.h: No such file or directory > > > subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:34:22: ne_props.h: No such file > > > or directory > > > subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/commit.c:35:22: ne_basic.h: No such file > > > or directory > > > > > > > > > it seems that the missing header files are part of > > > ports/www/neon/ but don't get installed; > > > > > > what is the right way to fix this? > > > Thx > > > > Were you using portupgrade or portmanage? They are supposed to > > automagically take care of problems like that. > > > > Sometimes, even if you use them, the build doesn't happen but if > > you look at the configure messages, you will see it is missing. > > Since it is in the dependancy list, I would just build neon and try > > building subversion again. > > > > I first would try updating subversion with one of the tools and see > > if it is fixed for you. > > I deinstalled ports/www/neon/ and installed it again; now it placed > the header files and the ports/devel/subversion went fine; I don't > know why it did not automatically in the process started by 'make > install' in ports/x11/kde :-(( > > I had one or two PANIC's during the makes and while I was copying > over my homeland from the older notebook, maybe the later fsck > removed the just installed header files; > > with the PANIC's I still have to work out, what's going on; I can > now reproduce them by: > > - booting into normal runlevel > - login as root and than > # kldload kqemu > # kldstat > # su - user --> PANIC > > Any hints on that? Boot to single user and fsck your system. It sounds like you have some=20 bad sectors. If the fsck removed anything you just added such as header=20 files, you could have problems like you saw. FreeBSD will do a=20 background fsck but sometimes you need to do it in the foreground.=20 With a release, any panic is important. They just don't happen unless=20 something is wrong. Portupgrade or portmanage can reduce the chances of=20 building modules out of order. If you build them manually out of order,=20 problems like the one you saw with neon can happen. If it is software, you can back out ports that you load until you don't=20 have problems. A panic can happen with the ?-stables and that is why you boot to the=20 new kernel is single user mode. Recovery is trivial until you have done=20 an installworld. Kent > > > "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > off-topic: > > Tu frase de firma me llam=F3 la atenci=F3n :-) > Tengo otra en castellano tambi=E9n y unas p=E1ginas pa' ti > http://www.sisis.de/~guru/Espanol/list.html > > matthias =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 09:39:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2383716A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:39:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CC243D66 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:39:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-91-227-82.san.res.rr.com [66.91.227.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBV9dk0q022405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:39:47 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051231012747.06857a90@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:33:56 -0800 To: "Robert Collins" , From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <006c01c60ddb$6167cf70$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> References: <003d01c60dc8$2090f930$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20051230215226.03679d60@cobalt.antimatter.net> <006601c60dd4$5319b7a0$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20051230223713.05d19280@cobalt.antimatter.net> <006c01c60ddb$6167cf70$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: forwarding http requests with ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:39:48 -0000 At 11:25 PM 12/30/2005, Robert Collins wrote: >----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Dawson" >To: "Robert Collins" ; > >Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 1:46 AM >Subject: Re: forwarding http requests with ipfw > > >>At 10:34 PM 12/30/2005, Robert Collins wrote: >>>>At 09:07 PM 12/30/2005, Robert Collins wrote: >>>>>I've got a situation where I've got an internal host using a >>>>>private ip/domainname. Let's say for the sake of this discussion >>>>>the host is privatehost.internal.freebsd.org. privatehost isn't >>>>>running a webserver. But I would like machines on the >>>>>internal.freebsd.org network to query privatehost as if it was. >>>>>When one of these machines queries privatehost I would like >>>>>privatehost to forward those requests to my webserver, >>>>>www.freebsd.org, so that it can handle the request. In order to >>>>>accomplish that I have done the following: >>>>> >>>>>My kernel was compiled with these options: >>>>>options IPFIREWALL >>>>>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD >>>>>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>"ipfw list" looks like this: >>>>>00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 >>>>>00110 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >>>>>00120 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >>>>>10000 fwd 216.136.204.117 tcp from any to me dst-port 80 >>>>>65000 allow ip from any to any >>>>>65535 deny ip from any to any >>>>> >>>>>The problem I am having is that it seems the packets never leave >>>>>privatehost. tcpdump shows packets coming in destined for port >>>>>80. "ipfw show" shows that packets are matching my rule, but >>>>>tcpdump never shows any packets going out to 216.136.204.117. >>>>>tcpdump on 216.136.204.117 also shows that no packets are being >>>>>recieved. I did a tcpdump on lo0 just for kicks, and that didn't >>>>>show anything. It seems as if the packets are just disappearing. >>>>>Someone on #freebsdhelp suggested doing a "sysctl -w >>>>>net.inet.ip.forwarding=1" but that didn't help the situation. Is >>>>>there something minor I'm missing here...or am I totally off in >>>>>my understanding of how "ipfw fwd" works? >>>> >>>>To quote the ipfw man page: >>>> >>>>"The fwd action does not change the contents of the packet at >>>>all. In particular, the destination address remains unmodified, >>>>so packets forwarded to another system will usually be rejected >>>>by that system unless there is a matching rule on that system to capture them." >>>> >>>>You probably need to re-think what you are trying to do. >>> >>>My understanding of this portion of the man page is that the >>>machine receiving the packet, in this case www.freebsd.org, needs >>>to be prepared to recive a packet whose destination address is not >>>it's own. If I am correct in my interpretation then this part of >>>the man page is irrelivent to my problem. My question is not, why >>>is www.freebsd.org not receiving the packet. My question is, why >>>is privatehost.internal.freebsd.org not sending the packet. >> >>What tcpdump rules are you using to look for packets leaving >>"privatehost"? Same question for packets arriving at 216.136.204.117? > >On both machines I tried "tcpdump -n port 80". "privatehost" says: > >02:15:32.542383 IP 10.1.35.10.1732 > 10.1.35.72.80: S >2200576146:2200576146(0) win 65535 > >There is no output for 216.136.204.117. I've also tried " tcpdump -n >host 216.136.204.117" on privatehost. That rule doesn't produce any output. What's happening here is that since the dest address is not changed, the packet never leaves the machine with the fwd rule. If you want to see it, make your fwd rule look like this: fwd 216.136.204.117 log tcp from any to me dst-port 80 then tail -f /var/log/security when you try to browse to "privatehost". -Glenn >-rcollins >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 09:59:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90A216A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE9C43D45 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBV9xcJM098752; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:39 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43B65684.3000106@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:32 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051221) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Daniel A." References: <5ceb5d550512302123v691619e2me120853f2e591691@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550512302123v691619e2me120853f2e591691@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBC459ACBA8C166A754FDF243" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:39 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Pavel Duda , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBC459ACBA8C166A754FDF243 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Daniel A. wrote: > On 12/30/05, Pavel Duda wrote: >>In short : >>release - is something you want for your production system >>stable - is something you can use too without much worry - it should be >>"stable" right ? :-) >>current - is for brave people who like to spend nights to figure out >>what the hell is going on with their system and fight with all those >>mysterious kernel panics.. > Isn't "stable" supposed to mean that it's "feature-stable", as in > "We've discontinued implementing new features to this kernel, and are > fixing bugs"? Not in FreeBSD it isn't. You want 'Release' for that. 'Stable' is a development branch -- for code that has been well tested in the current branch and which is therefore something that could go into a release candidate. It's called 'Stable' for historical reasons and because systems with that tag run stably -- which is a pretty damn impressive achievement for a code branch that can see extensive modifications to whole subsystems of the kernel. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigBC459ACBA8C166A754FDF243 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDtlaK8Mjk52CukIwRA83fAJ9ZxsS5RZ/WokAhIQldAr9dqESquACdGpaW BHIqrrpKJ85Lmcl8/AR8rCc= =D/y/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBC459ACBA8C166A754FDF243-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 10:04:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4CC16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:04:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slackwarewolf@comcast.net) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F0643D46 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:04:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slackwarewolf@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (pcp0011279654pcs.pthurn01.mi.comcast.net[69.246.87.201]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20051231100432014008hrgoe>; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:04:32 +0000 From: Allen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:01:23 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <5ceb5d550512302123v691619e2me120853f2e591691@mail.gmail.com> <43B65684.3000106@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <43B65684.3000106@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512310501.23670.slackwarewolf@comcast.net> Subject: Re: Help me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:04:33 -0000 On Saturday 31 December 2005 04:59, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Daniel A. wrote: > > On 12/30/05, Pavel Duda wrote: > >>In short : > >>release - is something you want for your production system > >>stable - is something you can use too without much worry - it should be > >>"stable" right ? :-) > >>current - is for brave people who like to spend nights to figure out > >>what the hell is going on with their system and fight with all those > >>mysterious kernel panics.. > > > > Isn't "stable" supposed to mean that it's "feature-stable", as in > > "We've discontinued implementing new features to this kernel, and are > > fixing bugs"? > > Not in FreeBSD it isn't. You want 'Release' for that. 'Stable' is a > development branch -- for code that has been well tested in the current > branch and which is therefore something that could go into a release > candidate. It's called 'Stable' for historical reasons and because systems > with that tag run stably -- which is a pretty damn impressive achievement > for a code branch that can see extensive modifications to whole subsystems > of the kernel. Ahhh the good ol days of the CSRG :) Come on man, how can you possibly be impressed that they do that? They made Free BSD, it takes a lot more to impress me now > > Cheers, > > Matthew -Allen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 10:26:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E5516A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:26:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B3543D55 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:26:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISC0089PYKY4XD0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:31:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:26:56 +0100 Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:26:56 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <43c7d7777af8.43b66b00@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: Subject: Won't build. 5.4 to 6.0 ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:26:59 -0000 Can somebody please help me? I've been trying ever since 6.0-RELEASE to upgrade my 5.4-STABLE. -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> stage 2.3: build tools -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj INSTALL="sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh" PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin WORLDTMP=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp MAKEFLAGS="-m /usr/src/tools/build/mk -m /usr/src/share/mk" /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make -f Makefile.inc1 DESTDIR= BOOTSTRAPPING=504100 -DNO_LINT -DNO_CPU_CFLAGS -DNO_WARNS build-tools ===> bin/csh (obj,build-tools) grep 'ERR_' /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.err.c | grep '^#define' >> sh.err.h cc -E -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.const.c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.char.h /usr/src/bin/csh/config.h /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/config_f.h /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.types.h sh.err.h -D_h_tc_const | grep 'Char STR' | sed -e 's/Char \([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\(.*\)/extern Char \1[];/' | sort >> tc.const.h In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:93, from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.const.c:33: /usr/include/wchar.h:33:18: cwchar: No such file or directory cc -o gethost -L/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/lib -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:93, from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: /usr/include/wchar.h:33:18: cwchar: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:93, from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: /usr/include/wchar.h:35: error: syntax error before "std" In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:97: error: syntax error before "eChar" /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:97: warning: data definition has no type or storage class In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:1304, from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.decls.h:221: error: syntax error before "readc" /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.decls.h:221: warning: data definition has no type or storage class *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/bin/csh. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Thanks, Kristian Vaaf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 12:09:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FD016A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:09:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9836443D79 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:09:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISD009MD3C2XT60@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:14:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:09:36 +0100 Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:09:36 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <4704cd467549.43b68310@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: Subject: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:09:38 -0000 Hello! I am trying to provide the administrator of my upcoming NS2 with my zonefiles in the TinyDNS format. But I am having some trouble comprehending its format. Perhaps the simplicity got to me. Here is my BIND setup: http://www.home.no/hedhnta/namedb Here is my imagined TinyDNS equivalent, written as simply as possible: +mydomain.com::* +ns1.mydomain.com:213.187.112.70 +ns2.mydomain.com:217.155.55.77 +ns3.mydomain.com:208.139.133.90 @mydomain.com::ninja +ninja.mydomain.lan:192.168.187.1 +halim.mydomain.lan:192.168.187.2 +domain1.com::* +domain2.com::* +domain3.com::* +domain4.com::* +domain5.com::* I have googled like crazy to find a decent script to do this conversion for me. This was all I found, and it didn't go too well: ./bind-to-tinydns example.com output output.tmp < db.erralionic.com warning: line 8: ignoring out-of-zone data fatal: line 16: RR tried to inherit owner from previous record, but there was no previous RR Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 12:13:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7874116A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:13:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65D643D45 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:13:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from arwen.nagual.st (arwen.nagual.st [192.168.11.29]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:13:37 +0100 id 00039838.43B675F1.00003D4C Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:13:37 +0100 From: dick hoogendijk To: fbsdq Message-Id: <20051231131337.fd8a6097.dick@nagual.st> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: amsn-095_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:13:39 -0000 I upgraded my aMSN today and hoped to have webcam sessions with my chatmates. This was a new feature after all. I was very surprised not to see this happening. Webcamsn was not installed. Strange, because I had seen it on the compile screens ;-) I looked and there was no /usr/local/share/amsn/utils/webcamsn directory! The port did NOT install it (It was made though). I figure there must be a reason, but I have no idea what it could be. I did a "make" in the net-im/amsn port dir and copied the utils/webcamsn to ulsa/utils by hand. After a restart of my amsn the webcam worked flawlessly! So, the question remains: WHY is this webcam dir not copied to the right location after the compilation? Did I miss something? Anybody a clue? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 ++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 12:37:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6A516A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:37:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8A043D5D for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:37:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jBVCepP06852; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:40:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Kristian Vaaf" , Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:37:27 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <4704cd467549.43b68310@broadpark.no> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:37:31 -0000 Why are you bothering? TinyDNS isn't the "standard" nameserver that everyone and their dog has been using for time out of mind. The people that push it seem to like it because it's simpler, that is all well and good but you still have to live in the world where everyone else uses The Big B, so I think the onus is on the TinyDNS people to understand what the defacto standard is, not the other way around. If I want to ride a motorcycle on the road I have to understand the laws that govern cars, but car drivers don't have to understand the laws that cover motorcyclists. That is the penalty you pay for being in a minority, too bad, so sad, but the world doesen't give you any sympathy, so why are you? If you have a situation where you have an inexperienced person that is supposed to be administering the zone files, and you don't trust him, then load webmin and have them use that. The bind config module in webmin is very good, we have been using it for years. In fact I strongly recommend against editing the zone files by hand, since formatting errors can make named act very funny. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kristian Vaaf >Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 4:10 AM >To: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? > > > >Hello! > >I am trying to provide the administrator of my upcoming NS2 >with my zonefiles >in the TinyDNS format. But I am having some trouble >comprehending its format. > >Perhaps the simplicity got to me. > >Here is my BIND setup: http://www.home.no/hedhnta/namedb > >Here is my imagined TinyDNS equivalent, written as simply as possible: > >+mydomain.com::* > >+ns1.mydomain.com:213.187.112.70 >+ns2.mydomain.com:217.155.55.77 >+ns3.mydomain.com:208.139.133.90 > >@mydomain.com::ninja > >+ninja.mydomain.lan:192.168.187.1 >+halim.mydomain.lan:192.168.187.2 > >+domain1.com::* >+domain2.com::* >+domain3.com::* >+domain4.com::* >+domain5.com::* > >I have googled like crazy to find a decent script to do this >conversion for me. >This was all I found, and it didn't go too well: > >./bind-to-tinydns example.com output output.tmp < db.erralionic.com >warning: line 8: ignoring out-of-zone data >fatal: line 16: RR tried to inherit owner from previous record, >but there was no previous RR > >Thanks! > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: >12/29/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 12:52:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A755E16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E84343D53 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so2215482nzo for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:52:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RUd0ubtD59WDIR75GZvjtqnlXaKqqqVz3zYG/ytJOnOhbTiiufbL0QX5qOHKjne58+CyJI0sSbaWu5F/moPekNSy/pL1PvYERvFqgBDqv+JfCf0Z8w+WDf8IkPHBO8CtPQAaYbV2oQmuQYvand2QGfI0Dx+sz67gyZ2wt8ptKqM= Received: by 10.36.251.73 with SMTP id y73mr4477495nzh; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:52:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:52:15 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4704cd467549.43b68310@broadpark.no> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:52:16 -0000 On 12/31/05, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Why are you bothering? TinyDNS isn't the "standard" nameserver that > everyone and their dog has been using for time out of mind. Agreed. Personally, I respect software diversity in a very deep way and acknowledge that the one and only dns server standard is a bad thing for everyone. The thing is that there's been no success in creating an open-source alternative that works. I also respect djb, but his outright arrogance makes the users of his software suffer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 13:00:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FF016A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:00:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pascal.pype@skynet.be) Received: from outmx015.isp.belgacom.be (outmx015.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.4.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1660743D46 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:00:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pascal.pype@skynet.be) Received: from outmx015.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx015.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id jBVCxxZt029146 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:59:59 +0100 (envelope-from ) Received: from skynet.be (233-114.245.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.245.114.233]) by outmx015.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id jBVCxq3W029093; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:59:53 +0100 (envelope-from ) Message-ID: <43B680A4.6010601@skynet.be> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:59:16 +0100 From: Pascal Pype User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon References: <20051230044420.27250.qmail@web36107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051230044420.27250.qmail@web36107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardware graphics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:00:03 -0000 Jon wrote: >Hi, > >I need some help getting hardware graphics going. I >built radeon.ko and drm.ko from drm cvs and loaded >them, a quick dmesg drm says the modules are loaded. >(drm 1.21.0 20051229) I was told on here I would need >the r300 DRI module for my ATI Radeon 9800 Pro which I >got from the FreeBSD Ports 'dri-6.2.20050719,1', that >built and installed r300_dri.so. I'm using >radeon_drv.o in my Xorg.conf file as the display >driver, I had a look at my Xorg.conf Log file and it >says: >(WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering not yet supported on >Radeon 9500 and newer >(II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration unsupported on >Radeon 9500/9700 and newer. >(II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration disabled > >What else could be the problem? >-- Thanks >FreeBSD 6.0 STABLE > > > > > > >__________________________________________________________ >Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Hello Jon, The message "Direct rendering not yet supported on Radeon 9500 and newer" means the X server doesn't have a graphics driver included that interfaces with the hardware rendering capabilities of your video card. I recompiled my X server so that it emulates advanced rendering capabilities so that the xscreensaver , a screensaver that creates enhanced 3D images such as molecular structures of certain large scale chemical compositions , renders all its images. It means that all the rendering is now done through software rather then hardware. The default for X servers such as XFree86 is that software emulating is turned off on freebsd releases. Unfortunately I don't remember precisely what I did to turn software emulation of rendering on because it was years ago when I did it. What I recall however , is that the X server must be made from the ports collection. Once the build process starts , it must be interrupted by Ctrl-C. In one of the makefiles that you obtain in the working directory of the X server there is an option pertaining to software emulation of graphics rendering. It must be turned on. Then one continues with the classical "make" and "make install". Kind regards, Pype Pascal. P.S. I did this on freebsd release 4-9. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 13:06:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809BE16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E63743D66 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:06:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA14807; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:04:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: hunter.Sisis.de: mail set sender to using -f Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma014802; Sat, 31 Dec 05 14:04:53 +0100 Received: from almare.Sisis.de (almare.sisis.de [193.31.10.40]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA13204; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:06:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from almare.Sisis.de (localhost.Sisis.de [127.0.0.1]) by almare.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBVD8lp3020485; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:08:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@almare.Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by almare.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBVD8l1q020484; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:08:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru) From: Matthias Apitz Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:08:47 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kent Stewart Message-ID: <20051231130846.GA20156@almare.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && ports/devel/subversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:06:59 -0000 On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:33:21 -0800 Kent Stewart escribio > On Friday 30 December 2005 11:04 pm, guru@sisis.de wrote: > > ... > > > > with the PANIC's I still have to work out, what's going on; I can > > now reproduce them by: > > > > - booting into normal runlevel > > - login as root and than > > # kldload kqemu > > # kldstat > > # su - user --> PANIC > > > > Any hints on that? > > Boot to single user and fsck your system. It sounds like you have some > bad sectors. If the fsck removed anything you just added such as header > files, you could have problems like you saw. FreeBSD will do a > background fsck but sometimes you need to do it in the foreground. I think I did one of the fsck in foreground because it was unable to repair the file system and asked me to do it manualy; but I'll do it again in single user; I also have now fetched sysutils/memtest and will stress the memory because the 1st PANIC occured before I had build qemu, ie. I don't think that this is related to that kernel module itself; after the memtest I'll do a complete reinstall from scratch of the 6.0-RELEASE from CD; > With a release, any panic is important. They just don't happen unless > something is wrong. Portupgrade or portmanage can reduce the chances of > building modules out of order. If you build them manually out of order, > problems like the one you saw with neon can happen. I did not do that, I've just installed 6.0-RELEASE from the distribution CD-ROM and after the primary installation procedure I went to /usr/ports/x11/kde3 to make the desktop KDE and meanwhile that I was copying my files from my home dir of the old notebook (only userland files, nothing in kernel) and this gave the first PANIC after some hours; > > If it is software, you can back out ports that you load until you don't > have problems. this time after the installation of 6.0-RELEASE I'll only make /usr/ports/emulators/qemu to see if I can reproduce the PANIC with the above procedure; we will see... I'm not in hurry, because the old notebook is still alive... Thanks for your hints so far. ¡Qué tengas buen Fin del Año! Matthias -- Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH http://www.sisis.de/~guru/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 13:33:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3538B16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu) Received: from mail.hwi.buffalo.edu (mail.hwi.buffalo.edu [128.205.165.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8FDD43D45 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:33:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu) Received: (qmail 57584 invoked by uid 90); 31 Dec 2005 08:33:30 -0500 Received: from 10.1.55.4 by cliff.hwi.buffalo.edu (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. Clear:RC:1(10.1.55.4):. Processed in 0.100079 secs); 31 Dec 2005 13:33:30 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: rcollins@hwi.buffalo.edu via cliff.hwi.buffalo.edu X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(10.1.55.4):. Processed in 0.100079 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO Infernus) (10.1.55.4) by mail.hwi.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 08:33:29 -0500 Message-ID: <007801c60e0e$c9baa060$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <003d01c60dc8$2090f930$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20051230215226.03679d60@cobalt.antimatter.net> <006601c60dd4$5319b7a0$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20051230223713.05d19280@cobalt.antimatter.net> <006c01c60ddb$6167cf70$6601a8c0@dhcp.hwi.buffalo.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20051231012747.06857a90@cobalt.antimatter.net> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:33:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: forwarding http requests with ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:33:32 -0000 > > What's happening here is that since the dest address is not changed, the > packet never leaves the machine with the fwd rule. > > If you want to see it, make your fwd rule look like this: > > fwd 216.136.204.117 log tcp from any to me dst-port 80 > > then tail -f /var/log/security when you try to browse to "privatehost". I was thinking that maybe the packet was never leaving the machine for that very reason, but then I started to wonder what purpose does IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED serve. The manpage states: With the additional option options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED all safeguards are removed and it also makes it possible to redirect packets destined to locally configured IP addresses. Redirect them where? Just for kicks I tried a little test to see if the packet was getting handled by the "destination address". I did a "sshd -p 80", and wasn't able to connect to sshd. On the other hand, I was able to connect by doing a "sshd -p 81". So they aren't being "redirected" to the destination address. They aren't being redirected to the source address and they aren't going to lo0. So where are they being "redirected" to? Which is why I figured I was doing something wrong. If it's true that the packets never leave the machine, then what is the purpose of IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED? What's an example of a use for it? ipfw fwd
    log doesn't help with my understanding of what is going on. I also tried logging my match-all rule. Nothing there either. The packet comes in, matches the fwd rule and disappears. thanks -rcollins From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 14:41:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBB316A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0878443D7C for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:41:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o60so271253nfa for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:41:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kz2q2yHoFzu6AS9Ms8IPU1q/iQo7ie+RODivMTixfcILxy3CYSq2csyiP7N1Rgfc65KQSDlCaX/gXtdiR/3HzKYoxSU8UOEvOcXsMMztAbBULpPjJUkTbXH1GRcfFBABVs7WMywwPawa3WFlnAWKOlZ27s8faG2SJCU7HfNQuI4= Received: by 10.48.254.13 with SMTP id b13mr446611nfi; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:41:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.12 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:41:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550512310641m56d47051xf0913ba1283369ec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:41:35 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <43B65684.3000106@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5ceb5d550512302123v691619e2me120853f2e591691@mail.gmail.com> <43B65684.3000106@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: Pavel Duda , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:41:43 -0000 I think it's kinda sad that there is not a standartized way of versioning software, across the whole OSS community. On 12/31/05, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Daniel A. wrote: > > On 12/30/05, Pavel Duda wrote: > > >>In short : > >>release - is something you want for your production system > >>stable - is something you can use too without much worry - it should be > >>"stable" right ? :-) > >>current - is for brave people who like to spend nights to figure out > >>what the hell is going on with their system and fight with all those > >>mysterious kernel panics.. > > > Isn't "stable" supposed to mean that it's "feature-stable", as in > > "We've discontinued implementing new features to this kernel, and are > > fixing bugs"? > > Not in FreeBSD it isn't. You want 'Release' for that. 'Stable' is a > development branch -- for code that has been well tested in the current > branch and which is therefore something that could go into a release > candidate. It's called 'Stable' for historical reasons and because syste= ms > with that tag run stably -- which is a pretty damn impressive achievement > for a code branch that can see extensive modifications to whole subsystem= s > of the kernel. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 14:42:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B71D16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:42:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91A243D5A for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:42:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISD00BGGAFGJO40@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:47:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:42:50 +0100 Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:42:50 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-id: <4bf4fa5641bf.43b6a6fa@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:42:52 -0000 You got some messed up spaces, or maybe it's me? Anyway. I totally agree to what you're saying. I am running BIND myself and I am not changing. But this person who manages my upcoming NS2, he is the one running TinyDNS, and he is among the smartest software developers I know of, so his reason to use TinyDNS is not to be questioned. Thank you. ----- Original Message ----- From: Ted Mittelstaedt Date: Saturday, December 31, 2005 1:37 pm Subject: RE: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? > > Why are you bothering? TinyDNS isn't the "standard" nameserver that > everyone and their dog has been using for time out of mind. The > peoplethat push it seem to like it because it's simpler, that is > all well and > good > but you still have to live in the world where everyone else uses > The Big > B, > so I think the onus is on the TinyDNS people to understand what the > defacto standard is, not the other way around. > > If I want to ride a motorcycle on the road I have to understand the > lawsthat > govern cars, but car drivers don't have to understand the laws that > covermotorcyclists. That is the penalty you pay for being in a > minority, too > bad, so sad, but the world doesen't give you any sympathy, so why are > you? > > If you have a situation where you have an inexperienced person that is > supposed to be administering the zone files, and you don't trust him, > then > load webmin and have them use that. The bind config module in webmin > is very good, we have been using it for years. In fact I strongly > recommend > against editing the zone files by hand, since formatting errors can > makenamed act very funny. > > Ted > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kristian Vaaf > >Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 4:10 AM > >To: questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? > > > > > > > >Hello! > > > >I am trying to provide the administrator of my upcoming NS2 > >with my zonefiles > >in the TinyDNS format. But I am having some trouble > >comprehending its format. > > > >Perhaps the simplicity got to me. > > > >Here is my BIND setup: http://www.home.no/hedhnta/namedb > > > >Here is my imagined TinyDNS equivalent, written as simply as > possible:> > >+mydomain.com::* > > > >+ns1.mydomain.com:213.187.112.70 > >+ns2.mydomain.com:217.155.55.77 > >+ns3.mydomain.com:208.139.133.90 > > > >@mydomain.com::ninja > > > >+ninja.mydomain.lan:192.168.187.1 > >+halim.mydomain.lan:192.168.187.2 > > > >+domain1.com::* > >+domain2.com::* > >+domain3.com::* > >+domain4.com::* > >+domain5.com::* > > > >I have googled like crazy to find a decent script to do this > >conversion for me. > >This was all I found, and it didn't go too well: > > > >./bind-to-tinydns example.com output output.tmp < db.erralionic.com > >warning: line 8: ignoring out-of-zone data > >fatal: line 16: RR tried to inherit owner from previous record, > >but there was no previous RR > > > >Thanks! > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/216 - Release Date: > >12/29/2005 > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 14:59:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D46116A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:59:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C82D43D8D for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:59:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A725E55; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43907-03; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC9E5CED; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B69CD3.8070303@mac.com> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:59:31 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Daniel A." References: <5ceb5d550512302123v691619e2me120853f2e591691@mail.gmail.com> <43B65684.3000106@infracaninophile.co.uk> <5ceb5d550512310641m56d47051xf0913ba1283369ec@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550512310641m56d47051xf0913ba1283369ec@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:59:43 -0000 Daniel A. wrote: > I think it's kinda sad that there is not a standartized way of > versioning software, across the whole OSS community. Yes, well, not everyone behaves the same way or has the same preferences. The porter's handbook has a discussion of the different version naming conventions, most of which can be understood by the port system makefiles (see the end): http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 16:13:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDDF16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:13:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jan.zach@unient.cz) Received: from wia-smtp.multimedia.cz (wia-smtp.multimedia.cz [80.250.3.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C80C43D48 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:13:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jan.zach@unient.cz) Received: (qmail 1925 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2005 17:13:13 +0100 Received: from owa.unient.cz (HELO mejlon.unient.cz) (217.169.180.69) by wia-smtp.multimedia.cz with SMTP; 31 Dec 2005 17:13:13 +0100 Received: from [10.10.100.120] ([10.10.100.120]) by mejlon.unient.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:13:38 +0100 Message-ID: <43B6AE18.3020600@unient.cz> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:13:12 +0100 From: Jan ZACH Organization: Unient Communications, a.s. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051118) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43B54AFD.4090100@unient.cz> In-Reply-To: <43B54AFD.4090100@unient.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Dec 2005 16:13:38.0473 (UTC) FILETIME=[289F1190:01C60E25] Subject: Re: qemu and bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:13:19 -0000 here is the solution: http://qemu.dad-answers.com/viewtopic.php?t=554 Jan ZACH wrote: > Hi, > > I'm configuring qemu. Everything works fine except networking between > the bsd host and the qemu computer (I cannot ping from bsd to qemu and > vice versa). Networking with other computers works fine. Am I missing > anything in my configuration? > > Thanks a lot > Jan > > bge0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 > options=1a > inet 10.10.100.120 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.10.100.255 > ether 00:0f:1f:b9:ff:fb > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > tap0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 > ether 00:bd:98:a7:01:00 > Opened by PID 849 > > > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif > Expire > default 10.10.100.1 UGS 0 14167 bge0 > 10.10.100/24 link#1 UC 0 0 bge0 > 10.10.100.1 00:50:7f:25:2d:e0 UHLW 2 0 bge0 > 1183 > 10.10.100.122 52:54:00:12:34:56 UHLW 1 1 bge0 > 1195 <------- qemu computer > localhost localhost UH 0 495 lo0 > > kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 4 1 0xc07c3000 4188 if_tap.ko > 16 1 0xc0821000 be20 kqemu.ko > 17 1 0xc082d000 9150 bridge.ko > 21 1 0xc1e44000 d000 ipfw.ko > > net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: bge0,tap0 > net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge_ipf: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge.config: bge0,tap0 > net.link.ether.bridge.enable: 1 > net.link.ether.bridge.predict: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge.dropped: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge.packets: 11863 > net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw_collisions: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw_drop: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge.copy: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge.ipf: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge.debug: 0 > net.link.ether.bridge.version: 031224 > net.link.gif.parallel_tunnels: 0 > net.link.gif.max_nesting: 1 > net.link.log_link_state_change: 1 > net.link.tap.debug: 0 > net.link.tap.user_open: 1 > > qemu option to run net: -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0 > > qeumu computer is running winxp with dhcp enabled > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 16:21:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607F016A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:21:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=01486b8d26@iecc.com) Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D2B043D49 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:21:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=01486b8d26@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 12996 invoked by uid 100); 31 Dec 2005 16:21:26 -0000 Date: 31 Dec 2005 16:21:26 -0000 Message-ID: <20051231162126.12995.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4bf4fa5641bf.43b6a6fa@broadpark.no> Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: RE: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:21:30 -0000 >I am trying to provide the administrator of my upcoming NS2 >with my zonefiles in the TinyDNS format. But I am having some trouble >comprehending its format. It's pretty well documented in the page describing tinydns-data. The errors you were getting suggest that your BIND zone files contained invalid entries which BIND was probably ignoring silently. >> +domain1.com::* >> +domain2.com::* >> +domain3.com::* >> +domain4.com::* >> +domain5.com::* What are those supposed to be? Those are A records, they have to have an IP address. >> I have googled like crazy to find a decent script to do this >> conversion for me. I've found the easiest thing is to use the djbdns axfr-get client to AXFR the data from the old BIND server. That way you get whatever the BIND server was actually serving. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 16:36:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D602516A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:36:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3E343D48 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:36:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FC69B19D for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:36:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40883-14 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:36:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E199617F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:36:42 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:36:35 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <4bf4fa5641bf.43b6a6fa@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <4bf4fa5641bf.43b6a6fa@broadpark.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3351276.HND1GuGqqT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512311036.41044.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:36:46 -0000 --nextPart3351276.HND1GuGqqT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 31 December 2005 08:42 am, Kristian Vaaf wrote: > But this person who manages my upcoming NS2, he is the one running TinyDN= S, > and he is among the smartest software developers I know of, so his reason= to > use TinyDNS is not to be questioned. =20 This is getting pretty off-topic, but... He's a good programmer. Great. What does that have to do with his skills = as=20 a system administrator? I worked at a place that had a genius .NET=20 developer, but I wouldn't run around replacing Unix servers with Windows ju= st=20 because that's what he liked. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart3351276.HND1GuGqqT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDtrOY5sRg+Y0CpvERAmoBAJ9A8bR7EsOSDOHmcStVbUfqnHMQTgCgkmdV SsGBmwaLkSzgC/taWHrmB10= =2n5g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3351276.HND1GuGqqT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 16:48:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3593216A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:48:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4D643D48 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:48:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jBVGmDiU007524; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:48:13 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jBVGmDQ9007523; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:48:13 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200512311648.jBVGmDQ9007523@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: ldrada@gmail.com (Daniel A.) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:48:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550512302123v691619e2me120853f2e591691@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pavel Duda , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:48:16 -0000 > > Isn't "stable" supposed to mean that it's "feature-stable", as in > "We've discontinued implementing new features to this kernel, and are > fixing bugs"? This is covered pretty well in the handbook and that is better than what I would write. ////jerry > On 12/30/05, Pavel Duda wrote: > > Mohammed Arab wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to get some information from you regarding freebsd system, > > > really is very confuse to know which one is stable system when i went to > > > site i found many freebsd system one is called stable and another one is > > > current and release. Can you please explain me on this topic and which one i > > > have to choice. I am interesting to know everything about this system. > > > > > > > In short : > > release - is something you want for your production system > > stable - is something you can use too without much worry - it should be > > "stable" right ? :-) > > current - is for brave people who like to spend nights to figure out > > what the hell is going on with their system and fight with all those > > mysterious kernel panics.. > > > > For start you should use at least stable version, you can always mess up > > your system by switching to current :-D > > > > > > > Also there is no GUI Graphics on freebsd and why I have manually install > > > and configure video graphics also. can you help me and give me the > > > instruction how to setup VGA CARD. > > > > > > > I think that you should start here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ > > You will find there most answers to your questions and if something goes > > wrong you can always come here for advice. > > > > > > Welcome to FreeBSD world !!! > > > > Pavel > > > > > > > > I am waiting for your reply. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mohammed Arab > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 17:18:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0CF16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:18:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FD743D5F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:18:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3517F42; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:18:14 -0500 (EST) References: <20051227211433.J1087@ganymede.hub.org> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Marc =?ISO-8859-1?B?Ry4=?= Fournier Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:18:14 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Load Balancing": How Busy are the servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:18:16 -0000 Marc G. Fournier writes: > 1. What variables on a server should be monitored to determine how busy a > server is? I am a fairly new sysadmin.. who inheritted nearly 20 machines, so take my comments with a gain of salt. Before that the most I ever had was 7, mostly DB, FreeBSD machines :-) .. and.. Hi Marc. :) I think it comes down to primarily 3 factors * RAM * CPU * DISK If you are hitting Swap, you are either running too many programs/services or too many users. Same for CPU Disk are different in that the same number of disks can perform different based on what raid controller and what type of RAID. I use top and load average to determine if a machine is up to capacity in memory/cpu. I use vmstat to determine if the disk subsystem is falling behind. BIG NOTE: The one thing that I have yet to really pay much attention is the network performance. Fortunately we just hired someone who has significantly more experience on that area. :-) > 2. Are there any tools that I can run to give me a point in time "summary" > of how busy a server is based on these several factors? I think there are lots of tools. Some vary from SNMP capture/graphing, to custom made tools done in-house. I think it's a combination of how difficult it is to setup vs what you need to monitor. At work we are just starting to roll out an SNMP tool. The new hire is leading the effort so I am not very familiar with the setups.. the one thing I see so far is that ultimately, there usually are things that one needs to monitor that is unique to your organization and you need to either integrate a program into the tool or do your own independant monitoring of that particular resource. I think the ISP list may be a good resource since the needs of the average user are different from ISPs/companies with numerous machines. > Basically, I'd like to keep track of multiple servers and be able to say > "this server is running >75% of capacity, time to upgrade or move things > off of it" ... if its possible ... ? In my opinion, for the most part, the answer is yes. The problem is usually how long it's going to take you to setup the environment to monitor the servers. The program we went with was chosen because the new hire was familiar with it, but a search on the archives for "monitoring tools" will give you a long list of programs and opinions of which are easier. If I had the time, I think I would likely write my own tool. This way I will be able to measure exactly what I want. Right now I thik we will cover most basics with the tool we are going with, but will need to still do our own custom apps to monitor a number of resources and metrics. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 17:32:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5476E16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:32:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931D443D58 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA20102; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:30:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma020098; Sat, 31 Dec 05 18:30:06 +0100 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (torwart.Sisis.de [193.31.10.94]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA15307; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:32:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBVHWIpR009175; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:32:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:32:18 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051231173218.GA8745@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20051231130846.GA20156@almare.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20051231130846.GA20156@almare.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (i386) Cc: Kent Stewart Subject: 6.0-REL && ports/emulators/qemu = PANIC (was: Re: 6.0-REL && ports/devel/subversion) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: guru@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:32:25 -0000 El día Saturday, December 31, 2005 a las 02:08:47PM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: > this time after the installation of 6.0-RELEASE I'll only make > /usr/ports/emulators/qemu to see if I can reproduce the PANIC > with the above procedure; we will see... yes, it can be reproduced; I've fresh installed 6.0-RELEASE and did only: # cd /usr/ports/emulators/qemu # make WITH_KQEMU=yes # make install # kldload kqemu # kldstat # su - user PANIC :-(( matthias -- Matthias Apitz / Sisis Informationssysteme GmbH ein Tochterunternehmen der OCLC PICA B.V. Leiden (NL) D-82041 Oberhaching, Gruenwalder Weg 28g Fon: +49 89 / 61308-351, Fax: -399, Mobile +49 170 4527211 http://www.sisis.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 18:32:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E5116A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:32:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2434043D49 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:32:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBVIVdPv028080 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:31:39 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jBVIVY1W028079 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:31:34 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:31:34 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200512311831.jBVIVY1W028079@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: traffic shapping X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:32:43 -0000 from where i can get a tutorial of altq which will simple to understand? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 19:28:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF42016A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:28:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbarnes@barnesos.net) Received: from c3po.barnesos.net (c3po.lpl.arizona.edu [128.196.64.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D8E43D45 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:28:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbarnes@barnesos.net) Received: by c3po.barnesos.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5AA42B878; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:28:16 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c3po.barnesos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450D0B833; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:28:16 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:28:16 -0700 (MST) From: "Jason W. Barnes" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051231122257.G13558@c3po.barnesos.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: 6.0-RELEASE installation to SATA hard drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:28:17 -0000 I am trying to install FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE onto new SATA hard drive that I installed in my computer. My motherboard (A7M266-D) does not had on-board SATA support, so I installed a PCI SATA controller from CompUSA (CompUSA brand was what it said). When I boot from the install CD and use the Standard installation, all that sysinstall sees is my old hard drive on ad3, and not the new drive. When I try the 5.4-RELEASE cd, it *can* see the new drive and designates it ad6. Has SATA capability been lost between 5.4 and 6.0? Does anyone know of a way to make the 6.0-RELEASE install CD see my SATA hard drive like the old 5.4-RELEASE CD does? Thanks for any ideas you might have, - Jason Barnes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 19:44:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC7016A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C277A43D53 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:44:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBVJhFx4002339; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:43:15 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:44:00 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <43c7d7777af8.43b66b00@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <43c7d7777af8.43b66b00@broadpark.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512311144.00809.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Won't build. 5.4 to 6.0 ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:44:05 -0000 On Saturday 31 December 2005 02:26 am, Kristian Vaaf wrote: > Can somebody please help me? > > I've been trying ever since 6.0-RELEASE to upgrade my 5.4-STABLE. > A few weeks back I did the upgrade with 2 or 3 computers. I had problems=20 but most of them were upgrading the ports to 6.0 versions. I would=20 cvsup, then cd in /usr/src and run "make cleandir" twice. Then, just to=20 make sure everything was clean, I would run cvsup of src-all again. I would cd /usr/obj and rm -rf *. This gets rid of the last bits from=20 the last build and then I did the builds. When I did all of the above,=20 I got a build and install on the first try. The only item=20 in /etc/make.conf that affects the build was "NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue".=20 Kent > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> stage 2.3: build tools > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=3D/usr/obj INSTALL=3D"sh > /usr/src/tools/install.sh"=20 > PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy >/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/u >sr/bin WORLDTMP=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp MAKEFLAGS=3D"-m > /usr/src/tools/build/mk -m /usr/src/share/mk" > /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make -f Makefile.inc1 DESTDIR=3D=20 > BOOTSTRAPPING=3D504100 -DNO_LINT -DNO_CPU_CFLAGS -DNO_WARNS build-tools > =3D=3D=3D> bin/csh (obj,build-tools) > grep 'ERR_' /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.err.c | grep > '^#define' >> sh.err.h cc -E -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I. > -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh > -D_PATH_TCSHELL=3D'"/bin/csh"'=20 > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.const.c > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.char.h > /usr/src/bin/csh/config.h > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/config_f.h > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.types.h sh.err.h -D_h_tc_const > | grep 'Char STR' | sed -e 's/Char \([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\(.*\)/extern > Char \1[];/' | sort >> tc.const.h In file included from > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:93, from > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.const.c:33: > /usr/include/wchar.h:33:18: cwchar: No such file or directory cc -o > gethost -L/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/lib -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh > -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL=3D'"/bin/csh"'=20 > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c In file included from > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:93, from > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: > /usr/include/wchar.h:33:18: cwchar: No such file or directory In file > included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:93, from > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: > /usr/include/wchar.h:35: error: syntax error before "std" > In file included from > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:97: error: syntax error > before "eChar" /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:97: warning: > data definition has no type or storage class In file included from > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:1304, from > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.decls.h:221: error: syntax > error before "readc" > /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.decls.h:221: warning: data > definition has no type or storage class *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/bin/csh. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 19:57:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6892516A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:57:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D526243D48 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:56:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC9B98C40 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:56:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26053-05 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:56:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E78D959BF for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:56:56 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:56:51 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3823810.NppZfW53Ft"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512311356.55543.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Sudo running without a password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:57:00 -0000 --nextPart3823810.NppZfW53Ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I'm using sudo-1.6.8.12_1 (the most recent version in ports) on my FreeBSD= =20 6.0-STABLE machine. I'm having the problem that any command I try to run=20 will execute as root regardless of what I enter for a password. Example: $ sudo -k # To clear the timestamp $ sudo whoami Password: root In the second stamp, I can give my real password, a fake password, an empty= =20 string, or ctrl-C - all with the same results. Here's my sudoers: #############################3 Defaults:nagios !syslog User_Alias DUMPADMINS =3D kirk Runas_Alias DUMPOP =3D operator Cmnd_Alias AMANDA =3D \ /usr/local/sbin/amdump, \ /usr/local/sbin/amstatus, \ /usr/local/sbin/amadmin, \ /usr/local/sbin/amcheck, \ /usr/local/sbin/amlabel, \ /usr/local/sbin/amflush, \ /usr/bin/mt Cmnd_Alias NAGIOS_PLUGINS =3D \ /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_vinum_wrapper root ALL =3D (ALL) ALL %wheel ALL =3D (ALL) ALL nagios ALL =3D (root) NOPASSWD: NAGIOS_PLUGINS DUMPADMINS ALL =3D (DUMPOP) NOPASSWD: AMANDA cricket ALL =3D (root) NOPASSWD:/usr/local/sbin/mailerstats.py #############################3 I don't see anything in it that looks like it should prompt me for a passwo= rd,=20 then run with elevated privileges regardless of what I send. Any ideas? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart3823810.NppZfW53Ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDtuKH5sRg+Y0CpvERAi2BAJsHuSjYbFCoYCI/HQiYv//fH1qXkwCgog0l 48oc7guxBpnN90C+pwytZeU= =Qdaa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3823810.NppZfW53Ft-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 20:06:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD55016A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:06:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@lackluster.net) Received: from tinker.apex13.com (tinker.apex13.com [69.72.250.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B6E43D60 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:06:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@lackluster.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.apex13.com [127.0.0.1]) by tinker.apex13.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCC139AB3; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:06:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from tinker.apex13.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tinker.apex13.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74378-04; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:06:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.108] (ip68-8-61-4.sd.sd.cox.net [68.8.61.4]) by tinker.apex13.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EBD398DF; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:06:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43B6E4DF.1020709@lackluster.net> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:06:55 -0800 From: Scott Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kristian Vaaf References: <4704cd467549.43b68310@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <4704cd467549.43b68310@broadpark.no> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) (FreeBSD) at localhost Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to convert BIND to TinyDNS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:06:39 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Have you read his site? I found it pretty easy to convert manually, but it does have instructions for doing an AXFR to convert all your zonefiles to tinydns. Scott Kristian Vaaf wrote: > Hello! > > I am trying to provide the administrator of my upcoming NS2 with my zonefiles > in the TinyDNS format. But I am having some trouble comprehending its format. > > Perhaps the simplicity got to me. > > Here is my BIND setup: http://www.home.no/hedhnta/namedb - -- scott@lackluster.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDtuTfKBeC2yZ3EEsRAgZRAKCUTfMEW4LOkwVnakrpDJGj5N4OXQCdGzSy wF+SYuYwS4tdWb1RskMhHa4= =0R/M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 20:09:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDC816A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:09:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFB343D49 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:09:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBVK8Wx4002570; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:08:32 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, guru@sisis.de Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:09:18 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051231130846.GA20156@almare.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20051231130846.GA20156@almare.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512311209.18367.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && ports/devel/subversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:09:22 -0000 On Saturday 31 December 2005 05:08 am, Matthias Apitz wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:33:21 -0800 Kent Stewart escribio > > > On Friday 30 December 2005 11:04 pm, guru@sisis.de wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > with the PANIC's I still have to work out, what's going on; I can > > > now reproduce them by: > > > > > > - booting into normal runlevel > > > - login as root and than > > > # kldload kqemu > > > # kldstat > > > # su - user --> PANIC > > > > > > Any hints on that? > > > > Boot to single user and fsck your system. It sounds like you have > > some bad sectors. If the fsck removed anything you just added such > > as header files, you could have problems like you saw. FreeBSD will > > do a background fsck but sometimes you need to do it in the > > foreground. > > I think I did one of the fsck in foreground because it was unable > to repair the file system and asked me to do it manualy; but I'll > do it again in single user; I also have now fetched sysutils/memtest > and will stress the memory because the 1st PANIC occured before > I had build qemu, ie. I don't think that this is related to that > kernel module itself; after the memtest I'll do a complete reinstall > from scratch of the 6.0-RELEASE from CD; Most of the time, it can not repair a file system with serious errors=20 when you have it mounted. That is why you boot to single user mode.=20 =46reeBSD does not tolerate HDs with bad sectors. You would have to really mess up your install for a reinstall to help. I=20 usually joke that a reinstall only helps on Windows :). I always choose=20 the typical install because that has been tested the most. You can=20 always tweak a working system but you can have problems when you pick=20 and choose at the first install. > > > With a release, any panic is important. They just don't happen > > unless something is wrong. Portupgrade or portmanage can reduce the > > chances of building modules out of order. If you build them > > manually out of order, problems like the one you saw with neon can > > happen. > > I did not do that, I've just installed 6.0-RELEASE from the > distribution CD-ROM and after the primary installation procedure I > went to /usr/ports/x11/kde3 to make the desktop KDE and meanwhile > that I was copying my files from my home dir of the old notebook > (only userland files, nothing in kernel) and this gave the first > PANIC after some hours; > > > If it is software, you can back out ports that you load until you > > don't have problems. > > this time after the installation of 6.0-RELEASE I'll only make > /usr/ports/emulators/qemu to see if I can reproduce the PANIC > with the above procedure; we will see... I would still bet on hardware errors but anytime you make a bet you can=20 be wrong. When you find what was causing the problem, you can say=20 "=A1Ahh!" :). > > I'm not in hurry, because the old notebook is still alive... I seriously belive in having a back up until everything works. When you=20 have a backup and something dies, you still have the back up. One of=20 anything can translate in to nothing works when you have trouble. I=20 have 3 email addresses and if almost nothing works I have hotmail on 5=20 computers. I can only deal with the interface for 5 minutes or so until=20 I mess up something. > > Thanks for your hints so far. =A1Qu=E9 tengas buen Fin del A=F1o! De nada :). It is a day to listen to CDs de m=FAsica latina that I have=20 worn out playing them in my car. Right now La 5a estaci=F3n is playing.=20 After them, I will play Elefante. Kent =46eliz A=F1o Nuevo > > Matthias =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 20:26:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA7216A420 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:26:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A3143D55 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:26:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBVKPwx4002737; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:25:59 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, guru@sisis.de Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:26:43 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051231130846.GA20156@almare.Sisis.de> <20051231173218.GA8745@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20051231173218.GA8745@rebelion.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512311226.44151.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && ports/emulators/qemu = PANIC (was: Re: 6.0-REL && ports/devel/subversion) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:26:49 -0000 On Saturday 31 December 2005 09:32 am, guru@sisis.de wrote: > El d=EDa Saturday, December 31, 2005 a las 02:08:47PM +0100, Matthias=20 Apitz escribi=F3: > > this time after the installation of 6.0-RELEASE I'll only make > > /usr/ports/emulators/qemu to see if I can reproduce the PANIC > > with the above procedure; we will see... > > yes, it can be reproduced; I've fresh installed 6.0-RELEASE and did > only: > > # cd /usr/ports/emulators/qemu > # make WITH_KQEMU=3Dyes > # make install > # kldload kqemu > # kldstat > # su - user > > PANIC :-(( > Does it still panic if you don't load kqemu? Test with just the new=20 install and see if it panics. I haven't had a panic with 6.0 except=20 that I have problems at boot on machines using the Netgear GA 311=20 1000baseT NIC. I get some message about loop back failed and it panics.=20 If I shutdown, I don't have any problem.=20 I use KDE and it isn't hard to make artsd panic. I convert all of my CDs=20 into wma's and load them on a Nomad Zen Touch. So, I can use the kvm to=20 switch to XP system that did the conversion and then play the wma's=20 without any problems. Kent =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 20:56:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D19716A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:56:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teoheras@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C8A43D45 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:56:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teoheras@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so2277646nzo for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:56:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=JATmxs4+Mmr7+ntildVFRf6R2wULDMde0XEAF88I744A5jTJ/8+wH41hZ7ALuwK6TMxwMhd895OvticQiNQqAP1wPlZfUijGZpqcJdbWkJfuDNVfDgWIrwpkh1buFDi+lU+9LTsf3U7yJNAt669zfiFJP+Id5FNIy1aar6semrk= Received: by 10.36.148.14 with SMTP id v14mr9409012nzd; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:56:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.147.15 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:56:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:56:36 -0500 From: Teo De Las Heras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Unable to boot to internal or serial console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:56:38 -0000 I read through serial communication section in the FreeBSD handbook this morning. I was able to configure the serial on one of my machines through the following steps: 1. Edit /etc/ttys a. ttyd0 "ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on insecure 2. Edit /boot/loader.rc b. In the very first line add set console=3D"comconsole" After doing this on the second machine and rebooting, I am not able to get to the serial console, video console, or SSH. There are not errors on the screen, just a blinking curser after "FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1" How can I get back into the system? Teo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 22:04:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC4F16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahan@bol-online.com) Received: from mxout1.dhaka.net (mx4.dhaka.net [202.84.38.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BE043D5D for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:04:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahan@bol-online.com) Received: from dell.bol-online.com (tcr6ep157.dhaka.net [202.84.37.157]) by mxout1.dhaka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00545A64B for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2006 03:11:54 +0600 (BDT) Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.0.20060101032351.033889e0@bol-online.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 03:24:35 +0600 To: fbsdq From: Aftab Jahan Subedar In-Reply-To: <20051231131337.fd8a6097.dick@nagual.st> References: <20051231131337.fd8a6097.dick@nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-BOL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BOL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BOL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam X-MailScanner-From: jahan@bol-online.com Subject: Re: amsn-095_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:04:12 -0000 actually it is make install clean -jahan At 06:13 PM 12/31/2005, dick hoogendijk wrote: >I upgraded my aMSN today and hoped to have webcam sessions with my >chatmates. This was a new feature after all. I was very surprised not >to see this happening. Webcamsn was not installed. Strange, because I >had seen it on the compile screens ;-) > >I looked and there was no /usr/local/share/amsn/utils/webcamsn >directory! The port did NOT install it (It was made though). > >I figure there must be a reason, but I have no idea what it could be. >I did a "make" in the net-im/amsn port dir and copied the >utils/webcamsn to ulsa/utils by hand. After a restart of my amsn the >webcam worked flawlessly! > >So, the question remains: WHY is this webcam dir not copied to the >right location after the compilation? Did I miss something? Anybody a >clue? > >-- >dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE >++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 ++ The Power to Serve >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 22:57:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A017316A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:57:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bcsfd204@twcny.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C826143D48 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:57:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bcsfd204@twcny.rr.com) Received: from ms-mss-04 ([10.10.4.34]) by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBVMvqRD024280 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:57:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from nyroc.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ms-mss-04.nyroc.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb 8 2005)) with ESMTP id <0ISD00BJ9X4GFD@ms-mss-04.nyroc.rr.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:57:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.10.6.30] (Forwarded-For: [72.226.142.240]) by ms-mss-04.nyroc.rr.com (mshttpd); Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:57:52 -0500 Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:57:52 -0500 From: bcsfd204@twcny.rr.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <349c7134ab18.34ab18349c71@nyroc.rr.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb 8 2005) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: 6.0-R, ICH6 and SATA problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:57:56 -0000 Hi. I'm running 6.0-R on a Shuttle SB95P V2 that is using the ICH6 and SATA150 disks. I'm getting recurring failures that either hang the machine or cause a reboot. The following messages appear to be common to all of the failures. Typos are mine. :-) ata2 disconnect requested ar0 Failure - RAID0 array broken ar0 Writing of Intel MatrixRAID metadata is NOT supported yet subdisk4: detached ad4: Detatched ata2: DISCONNECTED I dug around the mailing list archives but I could not find something that seemed to match what I'm seeing. The machine has gotten to the point where it hangs about half way through startup of KDE. (Sometimes, CNTL-ALT-BACKSPACE will break it and force an automatic reboot.) I have replaced both hard drives with no change. The disk controller is on the mother board so I switched the SATA leads from master to slave and back again with no change. I'm not sure where to go with this. The man pages seem to indicate the ICH6 chip is supported. The notations on read/write vs read-only support for Intel MatrixRAID leave me confused given the message "ar0 Writing of Intel MatrixRAID metadata is NOT supported yet". It's possible I did something wrong in the CMOS setup (there was comments in the man pages that I didn't understand about CMOS vormat vs formatting with ATACONTROL.) I'm attaching the usual DOC. TIA for any help you can provide. FreeBSD stargate.parquette.lan 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #2: Wed Nov 16 19:56:14 EST 2005 admin@stargate.parquette.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STARGATE i386 ATA channel 0: Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 6 Slave: no device present ATA channel 1: Master: no device present Slave: no device present ATA channel 2: Master: ad4 Serial ATA v1.0 Slave: no device present ATA channel 3: Master: ad6 Serial ATA v1.0 Slave: no device present ATA channel 4: Master: no device present Slave: no device present ATA channel 5: Master: no device present Slave: no device present The following dmesg was taken after a reboot following one of the failures. That is why it is complaining about the filesystems not being demounted. Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #2: Wed Nov 16 19:56:14 EST 2005 admin@stargate.parquette.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STARGATE Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.66GHz (2672.74-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x451d> AMD Features=0x100000 real memory = 2147418112 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2096594944 (1999 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link4: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link5: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link6: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link7: irq 3 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pci1: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 27.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 bge0: mem 0xd8100000-0xd810ffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:30:1b:b7:e0:00 uhci0: port 0xe300-0xe31f irq 23 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xe100-0xe11f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xe200-0xe21f irq 16 at device 29.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xd8304000-0xd83043ff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered umass0: USB2.0 CardReader, rev 2.00/91.44, addr 2 pcib3: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 fwohci0: port 0xd000-0xd07f mem 0xd8200000- 0xd82007ff irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci3 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:30:1b:b7:00:00:e0:64 fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:30:1b:00:e0:64 fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:30:1b:00:e0:64 fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant sbp0: on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170- 0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xe400-0xe407,0xe500- 0xe503,0xe600-0xe607,0xe700-0xe703,0xe800-0xe80f mem 0xd8305000- 0xd83053ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 ata4: on atapci1 ata5: on atapci1 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) acpi_tz0: on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcbfff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2672744460 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA66 ad4: 114473MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad4: Intel calc=b2613236 meta=5930991b ad6: 114473MB at ata3-master SATA150 ad6: Intel calc=b2613236 meta=5930991b ar0: 228946MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY using ad4 at ata2-master ar0: disk1 READY using ad6 at ata3-master da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 da1: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da1: 40.000MB/s transfers da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): NOT READY asc:3a,0 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Medium not present (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable error Opened disk da0 -> 6 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): NOT READY asc:3a,0 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Medium not present (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable error Opened disk da0 -> 6 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): NOT READY asc:3a,0 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Medium not present (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Unretryable error Opened disk da0 -> 6 (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check Condition (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): NOT READY asc:3a,0 (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Medium not present (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Unretryable error Opened disk da1 -> 6 (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check Condition (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): NOT READY asc:3a,0 (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Medium not present (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Unretryable error Opened disk da1 -> 6 (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): SCSI Status: Check Condition (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): NOT READY asc:3a,0 (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Medium not present (da1:umass-sim0:0:0:1): Unretryable error Opened disk da1 -> 6 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ar0s1a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted WARNING: /home was not properly dismounted /home: mount pending error: blocks 12 files 4 WARNING: /local was not properly dismounted WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 22:58:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300F816A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:58:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8F743D67 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:58:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D428DD2D27E for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:58:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:58:43 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: P5ha6pxjmwV58R5cekNwqOZ93KGLsCudVEqNeKNQW2eF 1136069922 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-196-191.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.196.191]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05C0571481 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:58:41 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:58:38 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051229141409.GA7881@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20051230082550.GA4596@rebelion.Sisis.de> <43B53C1A.2020809@scls.lib.wi.us> In-Reply-To: <43B53C1A.2020809@scls.lib.wi.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512312258.40374.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: 6.0-REL && isos of distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:58:49 -0000 On Friday 30 December 2005 13:54, Greg Barniskis wrote: > distribution ISOs as packages. Again, if you simply must have > sources not packages, then at your high speed location, do something > like: > > portupgrade -F '*' > > Then burn your own ISOs any which way you like. Try to be more > specific about what you want than '*' or you may be sorry due to the > sheer volume -- do you really want all of the sources for nearly > 14,000 ports? "*" is a package glob that applies only to the entries in the package database, so you wont get the source 14,000 ports, unless you've already installed them all. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 31 23:45:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9BC16A41F for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bhepple@freeshell.org) Received: from mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761BB43D58 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:45:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bhepple@freeshell.org) Received: from raita.finder.com.au (c220-239-64-196.rochd1.qld.optusnet.com.au [220.239.64.196]) by mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBVNjBW7014581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2006 10:45:11 +1100 Received: from raita.finder.com.au (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by raita.finder.com.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id jBVNjK0s004851 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2006 09:45:20 +1000 Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 09:45:19 +1000 From: Bob Hepple To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060101094519.7e8fa8a0.bhepple@freeshell.org> In-Reply-To: <200512301503.35221.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> References: <20051027113903.4ff19458.bhepple@freeshell.org> <20051029045346.0d82cde3.bhepple@freeshell.org> <200512301503.35221.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ext2fs and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:45:14 -0000 On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:03:35 +1030 Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:23 am, Bob Hepple wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:39:03 +1000 > > > > Bob Hepple wrote: > > > I need to export an ext2fs file system mounted at /mnt/guest > > > - it's a removable IDE disc that I carry to & from my linux > > > system at work... > > > > > > "mount" shows: > > > > > > /dev/ad2s1 on /mnt/guest (ext2fs, local) > > > > > > So, I put an entry into /etc/exports: > > > > > > /mnt/guest -alldirs -network 192.168.254.0 -mask > > > 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > and then: > > > > > > kill -s HUP `cat /var/run/mountd.pid` > > > > > > "showmount localhost" shows nothing and in /var/log/messages > > > I have: > > > > > > Oct 27 11:36:01 raita kernel: ext2fs doesn't support the old > > > mount syscall Oct 27 11:36:01 raita mountd[417]: can't > > > export /mnt/guest Oct 27 11:36:01 raita mountd[417]: bad > > > exports list line /mnt/guest -network 192.168.254.0 -mask > > > 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > ... so there's really no way to NFS export an ext2fs file > > > system??? > > > > Hmmm - looks like no-one has good news for me on this front so > > I'll try a different approach: > > > > Can anyone suggest a UNIX filesystem for a removable IDE disc > > that can be used on linux and freebsd and that can be exported > > by NFS? > > > > I thought most linux systems could mount 'ufs' file systems; > perhaps not 'ufs2' so you might need to be specific in creating > the file system. > > Malcolm Kay Yes - but linux is "READ-ONLY" for UFS2. Even the older UFS write access is marked "dangerous". So I'm not keen on using it. Cheers Bob -- Bob Hepple mailto:bhepple@freeshell.org http://bhepple.freeshell.org Public Key: http://bhepple.freeshell.org/public_keys.txt