From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 31 03:13:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA6216A40F for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piso@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from mail.oltrelinux.com (krisma.oltrelinux.com [194.242.226.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D98913C45A for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piso@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from newluxor.wired.org (ip-64-88.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.64.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.oltrelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA61F11AE43; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:42:16 +0100 (CET) Received: (from piso@localhost) by newluxor.wired.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBV2g3Sp060050; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:42:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from piso) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:42:03 +0100 From: Paolo Pisati To: Max Laier Message-ID: <20061231024203.GA8147@tin.it> References: <20061230195219.GD64111@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20061230214321.GG64111@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20061230214609.GA6996@tin.it> <200612302304.39194.max@love2party.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612302304.39194.max@love2party.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at krisma.oltrelinux.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't link kernel after recent libalias commits? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:13:45 -0000 On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:04:33PM +0100, Max Laier wrote: > On Saturday 30 December 2006 22:46, Paolo Pisati wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:43:21PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > Note that this was for a kernel that uses ipfw, but not natd (ref. > > > src/sys/conf/NOTES). > > > > my mistake, i'll write an entry for UPDATING. > > Shouldn't it still be possible to build a kernel with IPFW but without > LIBALIAS? i.e. instead of a UPDATING entry you should just wrap the > libalias entry points in IPFW - or am I misunderstanding what you are > saying? with my last commit, LIBALIAS became mandatory for IPFW, and this adds 40kb (-O nocona) to my kernel size. If it's really an issue, i can change it. P.