From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 12:24:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CA816A47A; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruud@t-boonproductions.nl) Received: from hannibal.insiteservices.nl (84-245-24-76.dsl.cambrium.nl [84.245.24.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FBA43D45; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:23:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruud@t-boonproductions.nl) Received: from hannibal.insiteservices.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hannibal.insiteservices.nl (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5ICNsA5030192; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:23:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ruud@t-boonproductions.nl) Received: (from www@localhost) by hannibal.insiteservices.nl (8.13.7/8.13.6/Submit) id k5ICNrmM030085; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:23:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ruud@t-boonproductions.nl) X-Authentication-Warning: hannibal.insiteservices.nl: www set sender to ruud@t-boonproductions.nl using -f Received: from 83.81.86.211 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ruud) by hannibal.insiteservices.nl with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:23:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <6470.83.81.86.211.1150633433.squirrel@hannibal.insiteservices.nl> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:23:53 +0200 (CEST) From: ruud@t-boonproductions.nl To: "freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=failed version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on hannibal.insiteservices.nl Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-8-8.0_16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:24:00 -0000 Hi, When i try to upgrade the port i get : ** Port marked as IGNORE: emulators/linux_base-8: unsupported by upstream, no security support anymore Does that mean that the port is no longer supported? If that's true what alternative port do you advise? With regards, Ruud Boon From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 12:36:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD04B16A47A for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:36:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cedric@decemplex.net) Received: from mail.decemplex.net (mail.decemplex.net [80.237.247.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1995243D48 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:36:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cedric@decemplex.net) Received: by mail.decemplex.net (Postfix, from userid 20000) id 426E07D1463; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:36:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (mail.decemplex.net [80.237.247.202]) by mail.decemplex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70137D1445 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:35:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at decemplex.net Received: from mail.decemplex.net ([80.237.247.202]) by localhost (mail.decemplex.net [80.237.247.202]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id J6OFqu3uYKdV for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:35:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ganymed.decemplex.loc (211.178-112-217.adsl.belcenter.be [217.112.178.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.decemplex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2F47D1162 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:35:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:35:40 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Jonas To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060618143540.16c28313@ganymed.decemplex.loc> In-Reply-To: <6470.83.81.86.211.1150633433.squirrel@hannibal.insiteservices.nl> References: <6470.83.81.86.211.1150633433.squirrel@hannibal.insiteservices.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.8.19; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DSPAM-Result: Spam X-DSPAM-Processed: Sun Jun 18 14:36:09 2006 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9969 X-DSPAM-Probability: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 449548b7223828247719290 X-DSPAM-Factors: 15, Url*decemplex, 0.99738, Fingerprint+CF03, 0.99709, E1FD, 0.99709, Url*//box, 0.99709, 30CCFE8D, 0.99709, AA99, 0.99709, B107, 0.99709, 30CCFE8D+GPG, 0.99709, Url*net/~cedric/cedric, 0.99709, 1B6B+E971, 0.99709, E971, 0.99709, ID+30CCFE8D, 0.99709, 9428, 0.99709, B107+9044, 0.99709, AA99+30CC, 0.99709 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=DSPAM_MULTIPART_EX-22382 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-8-8.0_16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:36:12 -0000 --DSPAM_MULTIPART_EX-22382 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_2aa2FionuC2/VsHqgu3P+Nl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 --Sig_2aa2FionuC2/VsHqgu3P+Nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:23:53 +0200 (CEST) ruud@t-boonproductions.nl wrote: > Hi, >=20 > When i try to upgrade the port i get : >=20 > ** Port marked as IGNORE: emulators/linux_base-8: > unsupported by upstream, no security support anymore >=20 > Does that mean that the port is no longer supported? > If that's true what alternative port do you advise? >=20 > With regards, >=20 > Ruud Boon Hi, more /usr/ports/UPDATING 20060616: AFFECTS users of emulation/linux_base-* AUTHOR: netchild@FreeBSD.org We now use Fedora Core 4 as the linux base port, and the corresponding xorg libs for the linux X11 libs port. To upgrade you have to run portupgrade -f -o emulators/linux_base-fc4 linux_base\* portupgrade -f -o x11/linux-xorg-libs linux-XFree86-libs If you have an up-to-date ports tree, there shoudn't be any problem. Regards, --=20 C=E9dric Jonas cedric@decemplex.net GPG ID: 30CCFE8D GPG Key: http://box.decemplex.net/~cedric/cedric.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: CF03 E1FD 9428 1B6B E971 B107 9044 AA99 30CC FE8D --Sig_2aa2FionuC2/VsHqgu3P+Nl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFElUimkESqmTDM/o0RAlmyAJ9ulxwoZ2/URU0TyBdJHOsj5DINigCeMJSD Ifr2mYRZC8dsa+KJpinXeXc= =E2+0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_2aa2FionuC2/VsHqgu3P+Nl-- --DSPAM_MULTIPART_EX-22382 Content-Type: text/plain X-DSPAM-Signature: 449548b7223828247719290 !DSPAM:449548b7223828247719290! --DSPAM_MULTIPART_EX-22382-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 12:37:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C7616A47A; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1345643D46; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FrwXA-000GQn-Rv; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 16:37:44 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FrwXY-000JMl-0e; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 16:38:08 +0400 To: ruud@t-boonproductions.nl References: <6470.83.81.86.211.1150633433.squirrel@hannibal.insiteservices.nl> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 16:38:07 +0400 In-Reply-To: <6470.83.81.86.211.1150633433.squirrel@hannibal.insiteservices.nl> (ruud@t-boonproductions.nl's message of "Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:23:53 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <51147152@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-8-8.0_16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:37:47 -0000 On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:23:53 +0200 (CEST) ruud@t-boonproductions.nl wrote: > When i try to upgrade the port i get : > ** Port marked as IGNORE: emulators/linux_base-8: > unsupported by upstream, no security support anymore > Does that mean that the port is no longer supported? > If that's true what alternative port do you advise? Please, read /usr/ports/UPDATING. If the information isn't complete, let us know. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 14:04:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5096C16A474 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A321943D46 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:04:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5D920.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.217.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5IE0DQA052491; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 16:00:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5IE4lfA080818; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 16:04:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 16:05:22 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060618160522.3d832094@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200606141245.k5ECjjjY086499@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200606141245.k5ECjjjY086499@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.8.19; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: olli@lurza.secnetix.de Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: new dummy syscalls for linuxolator -> new console ?messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:04:50 -0000 Quoting Oliver Fromme (Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:45:45 +0200 (CEST)): > Should I expect to run into problems with that in the > future? If so, I think a warning should be added to the > linux(4) manpage. I just did so. Is this ok or does someone has some improvement suggestions? Bye, Alexander. -- Selling GoodYear Eagle F1 235/40ZR18, 2x 4mm + 2x 5mm, ~130 EUR you have to pick it up between Germany/Saarland and Luxembourg/Capellen http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 14:24:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AFA16A47B for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F0C43D45 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:24:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FryBv-000Ga1-Es; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:23:55 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FryCI-000JRK-Ck; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:24:18 +0400 To: Divacky Roman References: <1150272035.1475.3.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060615094739.hqtxz7jadcw0cg0o@netchild.homeip.net> <1150365953.1475.12.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <61903339@bs2.sp34.ru> <20060615225737.5ce67d1b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150406814.1475.22.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617115606.35e71dfa@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150540976.1475.32.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617110756.GA90752@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:24:18 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060617110756.GA90752@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (Divacky Roman's message of "Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:07:56 +0200") Message-ID: <69065245@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yuri Pankov , Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-emulation Subject: Re: amd64 module of linuxolator X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:24:04 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:07:56 +0200 Divacky Roman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:42:56PM +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 11:56 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > Modify /usr/src/sys/modules to contain > > > _linprocfs= linprocfs > > > _linsysfs= linsysfs > > > in the > > > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" > > > section and build the kernel again. Please report back if it works. > > The build fails with: > > /usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:91:36: > > machine/../linux/linux.h: No such file or directory > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/linux-fs.patch > pls try this patch.. I commited this to my p4 branch and I just need the > testing if it loads/works (compilation is ok) The patch was applied against -current cvs cleanly except the first hunk. Thanks to Alexander (quoted) I did it by hand. After building/installing the kernel all went well. The only change I did to GENERIC was deletting of the option LINPROCFS. New kernel was loaded and linprocfs was able to be loaded/unloaded. Seems that a patch created against -current cvs tree may be safely committed. Thanks! WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 18:22:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B279516A474 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097B543D5C for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:22:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Fs1uv-000Gvv-Qm; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:22:37 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fs1vI-000Elc-66; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:23:00 +0400 To: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) References: <20060616085950.po4m4yfj4g0w8880@netchild.homeip.net> <58371182@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060616185513.GB839@soaustin.net> <15486674@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060616192943.GC2775@soaustin.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:23:00 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060616192943.GC2775@soaustin.net> (Mark Linimon's message of "Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:29:43 -0500") Message-ID: <83300923@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: new default linux base port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:22:47 -0000 On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:29:43 -0500 Mark Linimon wrote: > Here's an idea. > Let's try to update the Handbook with some text but say "see bsd.port.mk > for the current default linux_base, which is the one the ports team > supports the best." > That way, everything but the current value of the thing is in the Handbook. > That way, we don't have to have the Handbook possibly lagging the actual > value, when we commit to bsd.port.mk and then forget to modify the Handbook. Agreed. Here is the patch: ----- Index: chapter.sgml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu/chapter.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.131 diff -u -r1.131 chapter.sgml --- chapter.sgml 30 May 2006 23:08:24 -0000 1.131 +++ chapter.sgml 18 Jun 2006 18:10:56 -0000 @@ -172,7 +172,9 @@ corresponding to different versions of various Linux distributions. You should install the port most closely resembling the requirements of the Linux applications you would like to - install. + install. See bsd.port.mk for the current default linux_base, + which is the one the ports team supports the best. + ----- But since bsd.linux.mk file is not the simplest one to read ;-) I propose the next patch: ----- Index: bsd.port.mk =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.534 diff -u -r1.534 bsd.port.mk --- bsd.port.mk 16 Jun 2006 04:53:43 -0000 1.534 +++ bsd.port.mk 18 Jun 2006 18:17:18 -0000 @@ -1669,6 +1669,9 @@ LINUX_BASE_PORT= ${LINUXBASE}/etc/redhat-release:${PORTSDIR}/emulators/linux_base . else . if ${USE_LINUX:L} == "yes" +# +# Here is the current default linux_base port +# LINUX_BASE_PORT= ${LINUXBASE}/etc/fedora-release:${PORTSDIR}/emulators/linux_base-fc4 . else IGNORE= There is no emulators/linux_base-${USE_LINUX}, perhaps wrong use of USE_LINUX or OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT. ----- WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 19:46:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A39216A47A for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B376E43D45 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:46:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so576242uge for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:46:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; b=pTaEKSPxGqcN7EFtvvyfyKBnrbKfuptKeJUZDIwYXLQhj4lnETbKGHjPybMvcEkXqJb0W/H8Nu1+Zq+Ufki8OtoOV3qWVmD9eeypYIUo/GQdE6DNSP+bD9E7bDb0VB/xL0zp9oPFWUdXHy5s2RIAYZlHtuY5FTIh+Y5n+tE959s= Received: by 10.67.101.8 with SMTP id d8mr4359662ugm; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from roadrunner.q.local ( [217.185.119.168]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e1sm5691246ugf.2006.06.18.12.46.34; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from roadrunner.q.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5IJkdkQ010308; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 21:46:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: (from q@localhost) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5I9mgQi002282; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:48:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:48:42 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20060618094842.GA1046@roadrunner.aventurien.local> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon , Boris Samorodov , emulation@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger References: <20060616085950.po4m4yfj4g0w8880@netchild.homeip.net> <58371182@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060616185513.GB839@soaustin.net> <15486674@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060616192943.GC2775@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060616192943.GC2775@soaustin.net> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: new default linux base port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:46:38 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Linimon wrote: > Here's an idea. >=20 > Let's try to update the Handbook with some text but say "see bsd.port.mk > for the current default linux_base, which is the one the ports team > supports the best." "see bsd.port.mk" could/should also accompanied by something like this: To retrieve the current/actual value run 'make -DUSE_LINUX -V LINUX_BASE_PORT' inside /usr/ports" NB: This doesn't work right now, it only works inside a linux-port like print/acroread7 for example. I'm not sure where the problem is, but I find using make(1) to retrieve the value more user friendly than using grep(1). YMMV. Ulrich Spoerlein --=20 PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care. --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFElSF6524iJyD+6d0RAnGFAJ4ytSvz+Ajl/k+T8hqexVHK22fw3QCgnNMD TwtSTCUTfs9q6mVnbP+WF64= =Kb3P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 20:26:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EBC16A474 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF8043D48 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:26:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 93FC13073; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:26:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:26:05 -0500 To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20060618202605.GA1490@soaustin.net> References: <20060616085950.po4m4yfj4g0w8880@netchild.homeip.net> <58371182@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060616185513.GB839@soaustin.net> <15486674@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060616192943.GC2775@soaustin.net> <83300923@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83300923@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon , Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: new default linux base port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:26:08 -0000 Those patches look ok to me. mcl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 20:44:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668DB16A479 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84D243D66 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:44:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Fs47r-000HAm-BA; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:44:07 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fs49D-0000Hm-DX; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:45:31 +0400 To: Divacky Roman References: <1150272035.1475.3.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060615094739.hqtxz7jadcw0cg0o@netchild.homeip.net> <1150365953.1475.12.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <61903339@bs2.sp34.ru> <20060615225737.5ce67d1b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150406814.1475.22.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617115606.35e71dfa@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150540976.1475.32.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617110756.GA90752@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <69065245@srv.sem.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:45:31 +0400 In-Reply-To: <69065245@srv.sem.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:24:18 +0400") Message-ID: <38662196@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yuri Pankov , Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-emulation Subject: Re: amd64 module of linuxolator X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:44:15 -0000 On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:24:18 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:07:56 +0200 Divacky Roman wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:42:56PM +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > > On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 11:56 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > Modify /usr/src/sys/modules to contain > > > > _linprocfs= linprocfs > > > > _linsysfs= linsysfs > > > > in the > > > > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" > > > > section and build the kernel again. Please report back if it works. > > > The build fails with: > > > /usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:91:36: > > > machine/../linux/linux.h: No such file or directory > > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/linux-fs.patch [1] > > pls try this patch.. I commited this to my p4 branch and I just need the > > testing if it loads/works (compilation is ok) > The patch was applied against -current cvs cleanly except the first > hunk. Thanks to Alexander (quoted) I did it by hand. > After building/installing the kernel all went well. The only change I > did to GENERIC was deletting of the option LINPROCFS. New kernel was > loaded and linprocfs was able to be loaded/unloaded. > Seems that a patch created against -current cvs tree may be safely > committed. Thanks! Hm. While testing the patch [1] together with the one Roman calls linuxolator patch I got a panic (on AMD64). The kernel is GENERIC with deleted: options COMPAT_LINUX32 options LINPROCFS options LINSYSFS Loading/unloading of linux.ko and linprocfs.ko works like a charm. Loading of linsysfs works either. But unloading of linsysfs gives a panic when I logged via ssh. I see a panic message on the screen of the testing machine but the system does not respord to keyboard. If I do unloading of linsysfs on the console the system just hangs without any messages. In both cases only reset button helps. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 08:12:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D659D16AD10 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D6843D5D for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:12:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id E743B10D1; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 03:12:14 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 03:12:14 -0500 To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20060619081214.GA23951@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: status of emulators/winetools? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:12:34 -0000 This exists in the tree but is not connected to the build. It seems to be a repocopy from emulators/linux-winetools as of 1.9. linux-winetools is now at 1.11. Does anybody know anyting about this? If not, is this just some random piece of junk that I can nuke? I can't find any PRs about it even with searching on 'winetools' and even the closed PRs. This would have happened sometime between 2005/06/17 and 2005/12/27. Thanks. mcl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 11:02:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F412216A47D for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742C643D53 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:02:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5JB2n6M064140 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:02:49 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k5JB2mIh064136 for freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:02:48 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:02:48 GMT Message-Id: <200606191102.k5JB2mIh064136@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:02:50 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2000/09/22] kern/21463 emulation Linux compatability mode should not allow f [2002/11/07] kern/45023 emulation [linux] [patch] flexlm does not run with o [2005/02/19] kern/77710 emulation [linux] Linux page fault sigcontext infor 3 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [1999/04/16] kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with o [2001/08/14] kern/29698 emulation [linux] [patch] linux ipcs doesn'work o [2002/06/12] kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLIN o [2002/08/11] kern/41543 emulation [patch] feature request: easier wine/w23 o [2003/08/21] kern/55835 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux IPC emulation missi a [2004/10/20] kern/72920 emulation [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on o [2004/11/10] kern/73777 emulation [linux] [patch] linux emulation: root dir o [2006/01/04] kern/91293 emulation [svr4] [patch] *Experimental* Update to t 8 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 11:34:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2BE16A47E for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C13943D5C for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:34:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FsI12-000InM-67; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:34:00 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FsI2M-0001IJ-6D; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:35:22 +0400 To: Divacky Roman References: <1150272035.1475.3.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060615094739.hqtxz7jadcw0cg0o@netchild.homeip.net> <1150365953.1475.12.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <61903339@bs2.sp34.ru> <20060615225737.5ce67d1b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150406814.1475.22.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617115606.35e71dfa@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150540976.1475.32.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617110756.GA90752@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <69065245@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <38662196@srv.sem.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:35:22 +0400 In-Reply-To: <38662196@srv.sem.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:45:31 +0400") Message-ID: <81530949@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yuri Pankov , Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-emulation Subject: Re: amd64 module of linuxolator X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:34:16 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:45:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:24:18 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:07:56 +0200 Divacky Roman wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:42:56PM +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 11:56 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > > Modify /usr/src/sys/modules to contain > > > > > _linprocfs= linprocfs > > > > > _linsysfs= linsysfs > > > > > in the > > > > > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" > > > > > section and build the kernel again. Please report back if it works. > > > > The build fails with: > > > > /usr/src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:91:36: > > > > machine/../linux/linux.h: No such file or directory > > > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/linux-fs.patch [1] > > > pls try this patch.. I commited this to my p4 branch and I just need the > > > testing if it loads/works (compilation is ok) > > The patch was applied against -current cvs cleanly except the first > > hunk. Thanks to Alexander (quoted) I did it by hand. > > After building/installing the kernel all went well. The only change I > > did to GENERIC was deletting of the option LINPROCFS. New kernel was > > loaded and linprocfs was able to be loaded/unloaded. > > Seems that a patch created against -current cvs tree may be safely > > committed. Thanks! > Hm. While testing the patch [1] together with the one Roman calls > linuxolator patch I got a panic (on AMD64). The kernel is GENERIC with > deleted: > options COMPAT_LINUX32 > options LINPROCFS > options LINSYSFS > Loading/unloading of linux.ko and linprocfs.ko works like a > charm. Loading of linsysfs works either. But unloading of linsysfs > gives a panic when I logged via ssh. I see a panic message on the > screen of the testing machine but the system does not respord to > keyboard. If I do unloading of linsysfs on the console the system just > hangs without any messages. In both cases only reset button helps. I've got another panic but I'm not sure if it is caused by those patches. I've been testing a new patch for FC4 port on amd64. Building went fine, so did installing (linuxolator hadn't been loaded at boot time but was autoloaded when installing the port). Package building, make deinstall, pkg_add and pkg_delete went fine. But while "make reinstall" the process stopped (it was a remote ssh session) after pkg-message: ----- [skip] Let your lists for hosts, passwd and group be resolved via nsswitch.conf: passwd: files nis shadow: files nis group: files nis hosts: files dns nis Read from remote host amd64.sem.ipt.ru: Operation timed out ----- The screen of testing machine is (600K): http://www.ipt.ru/screen/DSCN0072.JPG WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 11:41:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F1D16A474 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52DE43D49 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:41:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5E220.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.226.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5JBb6Ij061765; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:37:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5JBfp48066208; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:41:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:41:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20060619134150.hbh86710igc4owcw@netchild.homeip.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:41:50 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Boris Samorodov References: <1150272035.1475.3.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060615094739.hqtxz7jadcw0cg0o@netchild.homeip.net> <1150365953.1475.12.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <61903339@bs2.sp34.ru> <20060615225737.5ce67d1b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150406814.1475.22.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617115606.35e71dfa@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150540976.1475.32.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617110756.GA90752@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <69065245@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <38662196@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <81530949@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <81530949@srv.sem.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1) / FreeBSD-4.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Yuri Pankov , freebsd-emulation Subject: Re: amd64 module of linuxolator X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:41:55 -0000 Quoting Boris Samorodov (from Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:35:22 +0400)= : > I've got another panic but I'm not sure if it is caused by those > patches. > > I've been testing a new patch for FC4 port on amd64. Building went > fine, so did installing (linuxolator hadn't been loaded at boot time > but was autoloaded when installing the port). Package building, make > deinstall, pkg_add and pkg_delete went fine. But while "make > reinstall" the process stopped (it was a remote ssh session) after > pkg-message: > ----- > [skip] > Let your lists for hosts, passwd and group be resolved via nsswitch.conf: > passwd: files nis > shadow: files nis > group: files nis > hosts: files dns nis > > Read from remote host amd64.sem.ipt.ru: Operation timed out > ----- At this stage there should be no interaction with the linuxolator anymore... > The screen of testing machine is (600K): > http://www.ipt.ru/screen/DSCN0072.JPG Wasn't there a recent commit from Alan Cox to fix a pmap related problem? Bye, Alexander. --=20 Selling GoodYear Eagle F1 235/40ZR18, 2x 4mm + 2x 5mm, ~130 EUR you have to pick it up between Germany/Saarland and Luxembourg/Capellen http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 11:53:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD22C16A479 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:53:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF1B43D58 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:53:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FsIJJ-000IqR-Ol; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:52:53 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FsIKd-0001JS-NP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:54:15 +0400 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <1150272035.1475.3.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060615094739.hqtxz7jadcw0cg0o@netchild.homeip.net> <1150365953.1475.12.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <61903339@bs2.sp34.ru> <20060615225737.5ce67d1b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150406814.1475.22.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617115606.35e71dfa@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1150540976.1475.32.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060617110756.GA90752@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <69065245@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <38662196@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <81530949@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060619134150.hbh86710igc4owcw@netchild.homeip.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:54:15 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060619134150.hbh86710igc4owcw@netchild.homeip.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:41:50 +0200") Message-ID: <49379816@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yuri Pankov , freebsd-emulation Subject: Re: amd64 module of linuxolator X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:53:11 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:41:50 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > At this stage there should be no interaction with the linuxolator anymore... > > The screen of testing machine is (600K): > > http://www.ipt.ru/screen/DSCN0072.JPG > Wasn't there a recent commit from Alan Cox to fix a pmap related problem? The machine has aprox. 10 days-ago current. I'll try to upgrade it. Thanks for the suggestion. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 09:28:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F7916A583 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net) Received: from mailrelay02.solcon.nl (mailrelay02.solcon.nl [212.45.32.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D0A43D48 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net) Received: from [213.233.249.108] (helo=[10.0.0.5]) by mailrelay02.solcon.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fsz0f-0004UQ-DL; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:28:29 +0200 From: "Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek" To: Alexander Leidinger Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:31:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200606131435.05327.frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net> <200606131918.06807.frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net> <20060617155923.6f85dbfe@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20060617155923.6f85dbfe@Magellan.Leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606211131.27414.frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound in multiple Linux progs X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:28:37 -0000 Hi, Sorry for the late reply. Op zaterdag 17 juni 2006 15:59, schreef Alexander Leidinger: > Quoting "Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek" (Tue, 13 > > Jun 2006 19:18:06 +0200): > > Op dinsdag 13 juni 2006 16:59, schreef Alexander Leidinger: > > > Quoting "Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek" (from > > > > > > > be that much of a hassle to let the linux progs behave the same, > > > > regarding to devices. So: is there a solution, and if yes: what is > > > > it? > > > > > > I hope the solution is as easy as to tell you about vchans: Chapter > > > "7.2.3 Utilizing Multiple Sound Sources" at > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.h > > >tml > > > > Tried that, with hw.snd.maxautovchans as well as with hw.snd.pcm0.vchans. > > Didn't work. With both on 0 every FreeBSD binary behaves fine. > > And with one of them at ... let's say 4? Did you make sure that nothing > had the soundsystem open at the time of issuing the sysctl (e.g. artsd > or esd not running)? Are you able to play more than one soundstream at > the same time with FreeBSD native programs? Which FreeBSD version are > we talking about ATM? Tried that, did not work. We are talking about 6.1-PRERELEASE here (tracking 6-STABLE on a irregular basis). I'll see what it does after my next update (not now, and not soon... no time). I decided to give up on it. My onboard-soundcard (VIA-chip, ASROCK mobo) has had glitches with FreeBSD ever since I have it. I can't get my microphone working eiter (something with the 5.1-over-output-ports idiocracy, which I cannot use either). When I can get my hands on a decent 5.1-card, I'll try again. > > On the soundsystem: what exactly is the difference between say dsp0.0 and > > dsp0.1? (No, changing settings in Linux progs to these devices doesn't > > work. It still appears to look for /dev/dsp) > > It allows to use specific sound channels, but the channels are not > fixed, you get a random one... so just use /dev/dsp (or dsp0 fir the > first soundcard and dsp1 for the second...). OK :) Thanks. Of all devices, sound is something I don't fully get on FreeBSD. But as long as I can play my favo MP3-collection, I'm satisfied. > Bye, > Alexander. -- Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek Pakhuisweg 16-II NL-6718XJ Ede the Netherlands T: 0318 516714 06-43536482 E: frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 10:01:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3095716A4A6 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EB543D8E for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (fenner@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5LA11xU050439 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:01:01 GMT (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k5LA11Lc050438; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:01:01 GMT (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:01:01 GMT Message-Id: <200606211001.k5LA11Lc050438@freefall.freebsd.org> From: fenner@freebsd.org (Bill "distfiles" Fenner) To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: devel/linux_devtools X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:01:39 -0000 Dear freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org.html and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with a problem is devel/linux_devtools. If you have already corrected the problems and submitted a PR, please accept my thanks and apologies for the delay in getting the fixes into the tree. This reminder is created automatically and does not (yet) have a way to know if a PR fixing the problem has been submitted. Please do *NOT* send your response to me directly; I do not necessarily have time to commit your fix; please instead submit a PR via 'send-pr' so it doesn't get lost. Problems are usually of two types: 1. The software package has been upgraded and the version in the port has been removed. The best solution to this problem is to upgrade the port to the most current version of the software package. If you are a FreeBSD committer, then you can just upgrade the port directly. If not, you should create the updated port on your own machine, test it (and maybe even run "portlint" on it), and then use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -uNr old-port updated-port". If you added or deleted any files, please make an explicit note of it. 2. The mirror site being used no longer contains the software package in question, or no longer exists. Solutions include: a) If there are other mirror sites, just remove the bad site from the list. (Make sure that what appears to be a bad site isn't actually a problem of type 1, upgrade) b) If the README or other support files in the software documentation mention where to get the software package, use one of those sites. c) Use a search engine to find another place to get the original DISTFILES. Make sure that you don't pick a FreeBSD distfiles mirror -- if you can't find any other places where the file exists, it can be a LOCAL_PORT or you can simply comment out the MASTER_SITES= line, with a comment explaining why. Once you have a solution, use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -u" of the Makefile. Note that this isn't an urgent issue, as people who try to build the port now will just fall back to the FreeBSD distfiles mirror. Please just put it on your list to do and get to it when you have time. These messages will continue to arrive twice a month until the fix is committed, as a reminder. Thanks, Bill "distfiles" Fenner. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 10:16:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C4516A474; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09B643D6A; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:16:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5F6CC.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.246.204]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5LABdmI072712; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:11:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5LAGmuX066083; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:16:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:16:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20060621121648.pt0hetpj2g40004s@netchild.homeip.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:16:48 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: "Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek" References: <200606131435.05327.frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net> <200606131918.06807.frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net> <20060617155923.6f85dbfe@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <200606211131.27414.frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net> In-Reply-To: <200606211131.27414.frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1) / FreeBSD-4.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound in multiple Linux progs X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:16:50 -0000 Quoting "Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek" (from =20 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:31:27 +0200): [moving to multimedia@] > Op zaterdag 17 juni 2006 15:59, schreef Alexander Leidinger: >> Quoting "Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek" (Tue, 13 >> >> Jun 2006 19:18:06 +0200): >> > Op dinsdag 13 juni 2006 16:59, schreef Alexander Leidinger: >> > > Quoting "Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek" (from >> > > >> > > > be that much of a hassle to let the linux progs behave the same, >> > > > regarding to devices. So: is there a solution, and if yes: what is >> > > > it? >> > > >> > > I hope the solution is as easy as to tell you about vchans: Chapter >> > > "7.2.3 Utilizing Multiple Sound Sources" at >> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup= .h >> > >tml >> > >> > Tried that, with hw.snd.maxautovchans as well as with hw.snd.pcm0.vchan= s. >> > Didn't work. With both on 0 every FreeBSD binary behaves fine. >> >> And with one of them at ... let's say 4? Did you make sure that nothing >> had the soundsystem open at the time of issuing the sysctl (e.g. artsd >> or esd not running)? Are you able to play more than one soundstream at >> the same time with FreeBSD native programs? Which FreeBSD version are >> we talking about ATM? > > Tried that, did not work. We are talking about 6.1-PRERELEASE here (tracki= ng > 6-STABLE on a irregular basis). I'll see what it does after my next update > (not now, and not soon... no time). As long as it does not work with FreeBSD-native programs, it can't =20 work for linux programs. > I decided to give up on it. My onboard-soundcard (VIA-chip, ASROCK mobo) h= as > had glitches with FreeBSD ever since I have it. I can't get my microphone > working eiter (something with the 5.1-over-output-ports idiocracy, which I > cannot use either). When I can get my hands on a decent 5.1-card, I'll try > again. In http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/ there's a text which explains =20 what information we need in a bug report. When it still does not work =20 after updating, I suggest to send-pr this information and a detailed =20 problem description. Bye, Alexander. --=20 Selling GoodYear Eagle F1 235/40ZR18, 2x 4mm + 2x 5mm, ~130 EUR you have to pick it up between Germany/Saarland and Luxembourg/Capellen http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 17:35:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D9916A474 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:35:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@barda.agala.net) Received: from mail.agala.net (Qe635.q.pppool.de [89.53.230.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB1A43D73 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:35:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@barda.agala.net) Received: from mail.agala.net (barda [192.168.20.1]) by barda.agala.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEABA119D95 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:35:21 +0200 (CEST) From: "Frank J. Beckmann" Organization: agala naga doron To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:35:20 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606211935.21224.frank@barda.agala.net> Subject: qemu with kqemu freezes when more than one qemu is running X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:35:35 -0000 Hi, qemu-0.8.1_1 with kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p7 on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE i386 freezes after less than one hour runtime when more than one qemu is running. If only one qemu is running everything works fine. When more than one qemu runs none of them can use kqemu without freezing after a short time. The frozen qemu can get killed only by a kill -9. The processor is an AMD Athlon 64, but I use the i386 release of FreeBSD. Please help me. -- Bye Frank From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 11:33:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E302E16A492 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dima@apk-inform.com) Received: from apk-inform.com (apk-inform.com [82.207.49.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF50943D46 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dima@apk-inform.com) Received: from alpha.aic-inf.dp.ua (alpha.aic-inf.dp.ua [10.0.2.5]) by apk-inform.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5NBXlP0077688 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:33:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dima@apk-inform.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:35:20 +0300 From: Dmitry Ganenko X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <885310187.20060623143520@apk-inform.com> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------D4EAE116F414BE" Subject: Installation of Oracle10g Express Edition on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Ganenko List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:33:58 -0000 ------------D4EAE116F414BE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Introduction It is impossible to hold in check a tear of tender emotions while reading a press release of the Oracle Corporation: "REDWOOD SHORES, California, Moscow, November,10, 2005 - the Oracle Corporation announced the release of Oracle Database 10g Express Edition (Oracle Database XE),a free version of the world-wide known DBMS for developers. The Beta-version of Oracle Database XE can be loaded from the website of the Corporation. New edition of DBMS Oracle Database 10g enables software developers, DB administrators and all those using the Oracle technology for the first time to get a free basic version of the DBMS which allows starting developing and expansion of their own applications. Besides, this version is proposed free to independent software developers and equipment suppliers for free distribution and embedding into their own applications. "Oracle Database XE enables developers, DB administrators, independent software suppliers and students to study, create and develop their own applications on the basis of the most advanced DBMS for free", says Thomas Kyte, the Oracle vice- president. "Nobody has ever supposed such a thing - anybody is able to start his work with the best market solution." You see, the most advanced Oracle has come nearer to common people. But as usually it has been nearer to Windows and Linux users. All the best is for children! But why are we worse? So, students, developers, administrators, let us start! 1. Playing the role of kernel hackers First of all, we should patch kernel - just a little. Having tried to launch oracle for some days with the following actions: using ktrace - kdump; then (after having guessed to pay attention on ports and joyfully detected linux_kdump there) using the last one; rummaging in kernel sources; scratching the back of your head; murmuring quietly abusive words about Oracle Corporation programmers, FreeBSD developers, Linus Torvalds, Larry Ellison and, of course, Bill Gates (nobody knows why him exactly!); dreaming in nightmares about teenage Daemons with pitchforks which fight with Penguins in red caps and then, after a short reconciliation, crash windows throughout all the Silicone Valley - at last you are to recognize: the kernel should be unbent, it really should! The first patch corrects the error in the Linux emulator in the linux_time() function (or maybe it is not an error) File patch1 --- compat/linux/linux_misc.c.orig Fri Apr 1 01:17:42 2005 +++ compat/linux/linux_misc.c Wed Jun 21 11:14:05 2006 @@ -711,8 +711,9 @@ linux_times(struct thread *td, struct li tms.tms_cutime = CONVTCK(td->td_proc->p_stats->p_cru.ru_utime); tms.tms_cstime = CONVTCK(td->td_proc->p_stats->p_cru.ru_stime); - if ((error = copyout(&tms, args->buf, sizeof(tms)))) - return error; + if (args->buf != NULL) + if ((error = copyout(&tms, args->buf, sizeof(tms)))) + return error; microuptime(&tv); td->td_retval[0] = (int)CONVTCK(tv); The second patch is for linprocfs. Don't ask me why it should be done exactly this way. It was found experimentally and by peeping into SuSE Linux 9.2 (It works somehow there...) File patch2 --- compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c.orig Fri Apr 1 01:27:16 2005 +++ compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c Wed Jun 21 11:14:10 2006 @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ linprocfs_doprocstat(PFS_FILL_ARGS) sbuf_printf(sb, "%d", p->p_pid); #define PS_ADD(name, fmt, arg) sbuf_printf(sb, " " fmt, arg) PS_ADD("comm", "(%s)", p->p_comm); - PS_ADD("statr", "%c", '0'); /* XXX */ + PS_ADD("statr", "%c", 'S'); /* XXX */ PS_ADD("ppid", "%d", p->p_pptr ? p->p_pptr->p_pid : 0); PS_ADD("pgrp", "%d", p->p_pgid); PS_ADD("session", "%d", p->p_session->s_sid); @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ linprocfs_doprocstat(PFS_FILL_ARGS) PS_ADD("priority", "%d", 0); /* XXX */ PS_ADD("timeout", "%u", 0); /* XXX */ PS_ADD("itrealvalue", "%u", 0); /* XXX */ - PS_ADD("starttime", "%d", 0); /* XXX */ + PS_ADD("starttime", "%d", 1); /* XXX */ PS_ADD("vsize", "%ju", (uintmax_t)kp.ki_size); PS_ADD("rss", "%ju", P2K((uintmax_t)kp.ki_rssize)); PS_ADD("rlim", "%u", 0); /* XXX */ The third patch corrects a bug (or maybe a feature) in the pseudofs code (it is necessary for linprocfs). The case is, if you assemble linprocfs and try such a program, then the read function will read not 4 as it was asked but one point less, that is, as it is easily calculated, 3 bytes: File test.c #include #include #include #include main () { int fd, count; char buf[10]; fd = open("/compat/linux/proc/self/cmdline", O_RDONLY); count = read(fd, buf, 4); buf[4] = '\0'; printf("count = %d, buf = %s\n", count, buf); } I am not sure whether the third correction is absolutely right; moreover, I am not sure as to its place in the code. This question is to real kernel hackers. File patch3 --- fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c.orig Mon Sep 6 22:38:01 2004 +++ fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c Wed Jun 21 11:14:14 2006 @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ pfs_read(struct vop_read_args *va) PRELE(proc); PFS_RETURN (EIO); } - sb = sbuf_new(sb, NULL, buflen, 0); + sb = sbuf_new(sb, NULL, buflen+1, 0); if (sb == NULL) { if (proc != NULL) PRELE(proc); We correct our kernel: # cp patch1 patch2 patch3 /usr/src/sys # patch < patch1 # patch < patch2 # patch < patch3 Then (it goes without saying)as it has always been done for Oracle launching not only in FreeBSD, but also on Linux itself, we add the following to the configuration of the core: options COMPAT_LINUX #it is as you would like it, you may load the module options SEMMAP=128 options SEMMNI=128 options SEMMNS=32000 options SEMOPM=100 options SEMMSL=250 options SHMMAXPGS=262144 options SHMMNI=4096 options SHMSEG=4096 options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" # as to this and what is below I am not sure options MAXSSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" options DFLDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" So, we compile, install, reboot... and go on. 2. We install the right linux_base Though it is written in the Oracle10g Express Edition Installation instruction that the glibc version should be >=2.3.2, it seems to be naive to believe everything that is written. It is going to work with the version >=2.3.3. Anyhow, mine didn't start working. At binary launching something told me about a relocation error and mentioned some symbols GLIB_2.3.3 or something of the kind. That is why instead of linux_base-8 you should install linux_base-fc4 (or linux_base-suse-9.2). # cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4 # make # make install Then we find somewhere libaio-0.3.104-2.i386.rpm for FC4 and install it with the help of rpm # rpm --root=/compat/linux --ignoreos --ignorearch --nodeps -ivh libaio-0.3.104-2.i386.rpm You also should mount linux procfs # echo "linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0" >> /etc/fstab # mount /compat/linux/proc 3. We install Oracle10g Express Edition We take distributive Oracle XE for linux86 (oracle-xe-univ-10.2.0.1-1.0.i386.rpm) from otn.oracle.com. Of course, you may also take distributive for Win32, but anything written above or below will have nothing to do with it. Install it with rpm: # rpm --root=/compat/linux --ignoreos --ignorearch --noscripts --nodeps -ivh oracle-xe-univ-10.2.0.1-1.0.i386.rpm It is installed in /compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle, but it is unlikely to work. You should replace it into /usr/lib/oracle with no variations. It is assembled by this path, this bright path is registered everywhere in scripts, so you have nothing to do but agree with it: # mv /compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle /usr/lib We launch the following script, answer two or three questions and go out to smoke. (If you are a non-smoker, you may have a cup of tea or coffee). Smoking should be fast, tea or coffee should be gulped because in some two minutes you will have Oracle10g Express Edition installed and working at your FreeBSD; moreover, you'll be able to use it any way, absolutely free, with your favorite operational system. File install.sh skipped (it is not interesting, and so long). You may found it and patches in the attached file. PS. This article in russian you may also read here http://wiki.bsdportal.ru/doc:oraclexe_on_freebsd With best regards Dmitry Ganenko ------------D4EAE116F414BE Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="orainst.tar.gz" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="orainst.tar.gz" H4sIAInGm0QAA+0bbVvbyDFfrV+xJ8hhA7Yl4xdqztxRcBpaB1zs9HJPyBlZWhsVW9JpJSC95r93 ZnclS5ZtIA+h97TeEGTvzvvOzM7uCtc3bIcF5VffsGlaVWvUavDkbf7JP+tatVqvNvYaev2Vput7 jeorUvuWQkUtZIHhE/LKd91gFdzdNaWTlxDoZZsr5x+e5oTe0xK7fnYemq6tmv+KpjfE/Fe0BgAC /F6tsveKaM8uyYL2fz7/G9+Vh7ZTZteKcn5xdNxpD96ev2u3yiHzyxN7KP2ifE/LhudF3zzftUIz KOtaqVLSyoz6t9SP8M9/PmtftARk1Nc7PWl9aCu9v3e6nfe91maClWD/28SbhEzp9M4usqMT5vhm MFHovef6AUkMz3UBm6ine9R/m6HU3MTuCKRzMuic/vni6OKXQRYadFcU02CUqJu6SmyHKOgoQUHJ UfPaJUWHqD3ssJ0xOefKkhMjMIaIomtj0r73fMoYaVt2YLsOOYUoMxyTlkolVcl5U9dpXXmMFN+T zaThyL8JHfvUIwgx2JwptnV5uAWDfKx4y59XSs4ekY8gIQKrpEVUlXw6UHLBNXWUHIHGQlJkcxyK JmCgpQnXSCWHpGzR27ITTiakcvi9/gCqnEUcLTvuxB2Tn1KmM11nZI/LzPRtL2BlzsQalmCOF7Ea 2dKi6onrUDDNwQFY2vXShnY97w9k6O+eYuknm8v1nmat7YJCZBND75kxpk1yhSZyjCklm9oV+Z3P w7+R/Bc1RgB0ygxTgZiwA6Ip/+10tG4v3KL1H38Zk8m3WP7F+t9Ytv5XKo16na//1cqeXtf4+l+F 4fX6/wItsf7zFLeZty1SDAs8x2mQ5BSe4mbJ5Rc3JFMwGhlSgjYjgUv80CEARkQqC31KRDYrEdJx x7B2GkzAGo6FgE6MoWRQRG7i6UhXIN29QFmyuup4sGh5rrIkrkuOB0edTuuYz8iVWId+I79aQ6NJ yjQwy2PfDWFNEmuPmBVVoRNGYbm7I3zUsCwCCGhAmE+hdXY5AdcPQtba/BE5BRQmdVN0kSL9DVaD eOqxcbosoiUXSOCRJKvkZiQjvHnS4FhaPJjiEDVQIoTJm7rgiX/hLOS0RQCgFVd3DgGVluIVxxxP ohctkvUcviCb7tQzAhhwwns+qbBmXnO3A7PeOaR4ISk2kU6WiJKmwLjjWMKpyeHMLo+kprCxMbWd ll6t72tavaopnuyoNxqNil7nAMZ9a1+r7Wn1vfo+B4COSn2/uler1upK/13ryjSCOd0gNszylAKt kRtN3tav7+i070Lex4LHuLshW797vu3AXFW+bF1xSty9NvvvSBmKrUoV4IZmYkQrVTVyuc0hcAh+ MWoRlZUvS6XtcllF2F53RqcI8IIGaDKA1DumQUyrUZO0el0J5GWBKnNAhJOKOMyoIhSsKvu1Rp0s k82bIXpPQjSvqXmT4Ekuf+BPsK+UPHZ7Diq8PuXtKLREkQ6XIOlJkt6TSKI6EoWTjBAScu5I2odC XONe9uAnwUWklayCMwwBl1skjiyIc7Fyxj0vWucIRiJ4jyYYqyYJIk2clKKNpThMzevZzL8uI+vy WCWrCm3bsYMShN4cGfQDYwzxMTYCOiPofTXBr5HrQ7tPp96zS5cgC+6G+bXeqOkks7LJdCtAGrVa FiJa+xR/SoojPw3gW8MpKxsWuGEZMpAZ1Rbf8UR8a/jlYOqVSzJVxxXG9MayfVL0MiAHMj5QGk2H RJiBkPmV1xjZwST3Bziv5rqUY4rbxqwOGnjUH7n+NF9QNqBfbE3xx4bpIxObBdShPmLuBg7DvRrj X7BOMn2KQFglWXK/uws0GA0Y7/QMxu5c39rlGzveFRHk+LAashgTqzT0APgGNMAeDjVh02z4nxVl kbS/85yS9r1rlwUo4uvyVfTxKuN1Dg1AqBs5+0kNF1DEcge8t3Pa67ehOht0zy/6T6Uo5iGxrD4W +Xk0TE7b82iYofgUDVPIizQMAk/K9Lbf7y6WZy5zeGCKkz8fozvaroMnE48Q62EaSqo4TFmIFB1K 9FpFV+IaURzAFEci1iauaUwG0XRCIMtlAuuewwUQm5vkhx/a52+Ujcc3iJMLOgYCPpeZuCNiy6Ml cmcH1zzaGBB/EtG0XC01f3RyctHu9UiL5LsX5/3z4/NOq3/cLZD82/NevzXzSehB27SETxUKqoIK 5WQer1cXWWZzU9hksUkODx+3nuXE3mKZcf8/TbvUsI83K6+LoghY7Npx/SPX2YUgdLKaCHrBg2QQ CE8XYQv39Ay2VMWvyK/LaEVF7pPyToytyH3jM+XE6AT6rTulXWOM12ZPT4qLiDyTfJBoLdeBrR+9 phPvq6TLkogyNs/DmZIQlh48MiGfCJmlbT5jy29MzmC31YkW5VIpPpfOrb63WH5xkTwbT854LMGx LHZQiMj+MeelXFeY6UMbTLNAFM7V91viAEcFCsVqtapri+dt4o7L2yX4fZVaFtVNICHvGxJrodQy qu0inUQyHRn2hFr86M29gbwKld8SjgSKPWLRABCYClTFmZs0W2w1YkwCyGp4wELYZ0Zsi0L9OrLB R4efyWVsnO5Rr/fz+cXJpXp5gDvmx9yH4MEg0ARXXGTBRewDOn1BCeJTT+FRMoj4wdQFqVe1BWc4 +AmrbnCMBHij9hDsBnf8RdupyOEotawhSUchPw8EKuAJUAXNe8iHdjNJqXmm4uKUwBEayqO0RyPl MnlkbpQvm9VqhpN0KyUZkF9/iYoHHs9zu6dEFp2/SY3tuSo5POt9aGyleb8T30/FNY2I9GN36k1o AGHQC03czo2AzGewDKzi6Es0CH2HaMqX5B7PYDd8f8fLF1G5KY8xfSrJKMWnNqV/bTMo7kDP2ZG/ 6xSHuIH2fBe2noFNGZaCq6RRpDiQ3vqw4R25k4l7h97zWwj5EgYkD8hq1IcNEdST1xSm0E/towm7 dsOJRZQhFUsJUgg90FJmGJRqV+yyYeGFnBcIspCFdqNLjHgDjttxsKXCIYBiiMs3T60RO8M03dAJ GEjd5Wr80HZAvkPclcMY9cT23aIjI5wgmHIc+JPisWBqDEGGksJrUh4/G3hIiQhYGXAJya0xCaFE v7uG3E+aSs5yxa206PhIdNwjYQcMkESLwrDnUdMefeZUscgQVLleGbXk/Bx53sQ2hSdG0/NxX9vX PjVTLLCOIJ3Ts3aqVySwf+HG76wtU1fUFl4KIFwLyadGZEaJGkrduoItMd41kKLh4KFOYHpRxJcE u7nD7uoXTAlmCBjWVmkL8mrlKiss5AYXi44WViFARX2M1Ny+XbQlxyaG51HDZzjxYFLbQaviImY4 LvdSY2bU0mWGWndCuffKyTKIZY9G1IfVkGteSk9t8oYkakOYjZuDZSaEeo8qwk/kqy9CUVu+46Cq BSVDLdVzMKO9/fFXrfinT9uFrMNBGgOHta2ZAzeFI6hLiaWpxHVwazPjWQuF4uLzNx1yXEn8mo6l ePu2IJ4ID6iUCvG3ZITN7LgyyIxV0ZXKU7FQH/E05BsGVnzYErW5wEIV/lCRlvtfCLXcbGi2vZ0L vKj/2WMvGXbk8PvKwpDZLpBUf/QeVByAYnMST1OsUcrVeG/qBGFB3KYViwmlbJuL1TjJhIhpODCz ONdxgWFBhcEDiuFbUMIr2Ir1qzRjO+f/j0ohcdhGlUFyDW7G6+9MCV7/zpKCxJIeu7KMOHP51YAR xOopMXompfR+6fGiBZ799jvAlhbwqelOp9SxxIUCxgeUX0rC0+MKB8lQw7zOCMMLMajswPrIEy1D jBHu2BQ8e7GNWb3HTd1Uuf7zdUlkFijHgs+kyK2z+LVE2BhPvege8fRNL50/iHyHAgZa6qWj5iRS OkuLvpjn4kQa40AynXdwRM2JpCiffC670RSANba4K6LwJcKrvdiaTRUcZxb6M+4RbVyENyLRGFSE oC44KGQDi97Hsny83LpUP11FkOLtHQHPr05x/yLHeDBupJQTm70IIOmQ/URpSz67IaEoPbgSzGOA L4uBHCKDmNcGOBIMsqyKuYi0ODvOiaiWfXjOONM1l5OGTB/SwFY4WWVLx0mbTI+QyVyTaUpYKs5Q unhpMzoMFQwxjHMJ5t3Y6S2XYEaZ4hUm+LlQcV4meTgeaZjjh6hxgogad+vFXp0EmzvIkFkyN+fY mxgC2cXgQPKd3+5lL/gSr3lG7//xe9q9b/OOGb7/V69W8X0/vVHTk0/eatVK/PcflUoD4Cs1vfrC 7/9Z9tRYDQd+/hICvWyDrTkZsbLHaGi5iQ+DW8f1WMksub49zr2DNbIHVR2pk0qlubff1HRS0bSq srOzsxI99zMkjr+GDqnoRNebehV+ELOu/PQTKdb2tN0G2REP6PAAEWM7zwI/NKEKdz3+fWD4Y0a2 bw2oZyDSuhftTjuPbzQVDrCj+6Y3uGj331+ckXz79Jx3flGKOTaEEpINw9HAoXd5NtwlZ+87nV0C PRPq7BINIHcegNrRBRyvfPII2+LjBfI7ssZOFARzDO/OCvjfnuHVLRX/lW/D44H41+t1PRv/9XX8 v0TD+J+9KIguC1Ecf4ri/41vQ70MZtKJpjcrjaZexyiu8fhfhb4g/rVE/Os1Hv/8AR0x4sBy8QPu LfMY3W9OO53B0cVfehhfPFb5hnLEw1V9bam7xCseegPPtjBWNyw6wrO/bm9wdHKSx3vGXTKaBrsE EkmBZAjAv3gUGEg0FatjdTeXU/OvWQE+cBbYCTyKMRQK6XOw1yY8trStwgEpb5MPHz6Q7TIkmGWA vTTgjK8Hagg4K+LqeYFPfiTxZ6ksacrkFKOOfW8edSyMMpMDdjpQicN4Akp2Fg/ZgHF4kZ/F/Ow9 aX5iWXwbnCf4HDPSlugb2FPqhgGHC1fA2QEsBhN+NLMENjUrfoCEl3DfWQGpL+F/y+x/UWHdfyLv fAguNDXuB0Hhxivd2AMcT5naZywB3638LZ/BARDESqNNbOF4C1R85vhP5X/9mYnL9lD+1/bqifxf F/n/pf/+Y53/xYvi/PdgajNzcfLXG81qZVHyn8PNZn6tNsv8DV3f3Sc7+PiTzCyAiVHIouIvuObb vO3A2iWya2JDkARTVoL/AzNEcKjdjs/P/tE//ls+sIqHgTXAxMQzGiQnxjO2H5b8cMDBeZjFFNjT KLCIAuQZLPzy1PddH/BN14ONcpD/HqjyVQSwYI0BuSG03VEeugvQAC0nL+U4JlafSCdGmFWRO7mv 4wB4cywIKDy1TfzjDRQfKNwKIwhdARgS6kftE74lBampENvi9g9fu67buq3buq3buq3buq3buq3b uq3buq3b49p/APnDFBcAUAAA ------------D4EAE116F414BE-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 12:50:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA5016A49A for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from consumidor@mundinho.com.br) Received: from smtp2.hydra.com.br (smtp2.hydra.com.br [200.184.92.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA4843D60 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:50:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from consumidor@mundinho.com.br) Received: (qmail 29028 invoked by uid 509); 23 Jun 2006 08:10:44 +0000 Received: from 200-171-2-205.hydra.com.br (HELO kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br) (200.171.2.205) by smtp2.hydra.com.br with SMTP; 23 Jun 2006 08:10:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AA83499CB for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:50:40 -0300 (BRT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682743499CE for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:50:40 -0300 (BRT) Received: from kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bigfoot.usina-de-imagens.com.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41156-01-9 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:50:38 -0300 (BRT) Received: from bigfoot.usina-de-imagens.com.br (bigfoot.usina-de-imagens.com.br [192.168.0.5]) by kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8935F3499FF for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:27:48 -0300 (BRT) From: consumidor Organization: mundinho To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:24:47 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kolab.usina-de-imagens.com.br Subject: linux_base-fc4 installing in the wrong path X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: consumidor@mundinho.com.br List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:50:55 -0000 gentlemen: my port of linux_base-fc4 is installing all binaries, libs etc in /usr/local. at the end of the install it "brands" all my binaries in /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin, so my applications become unusable. It also installs libc.so.6 on /usr/local/lib, breaking a lot of stuff. I googled for hours, to no avail. Would you please help me on getting this done right? I mean, I presume it should be installed on /usr/compat/linux cheers, joe karma From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 12:56:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342B816A492 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:56:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D1343D5A for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:56:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from srv.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1]) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtlCd-000Bev-Jz; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:56:03 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtlDk-000CDO-2L; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:57:12 +0400 To: consumidor@mundinho.com.br References: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:57:12 +0400 In-Reply-To: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> (consumidor@mundinho.com.br's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:24:47 -0300") Message-ID: <02924903@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base-fc4 installing in the wrong path X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:56:06 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:24:47 -0300 consumidor wrote: > my port of linux_base-fc4 is installing all binaries, libs etc in > /usr/local. at the end of the install it "brands" all my binaries in > /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin, so my applications become > unusable. It also installs libc.so.6 on /usr/local/lib, breaking a lot > of stuff. I googled for hours, to no avail. Would you please help me > on getting this done right? I mean, I presume it should be installed > on /usr/compat/linux Please, do: $ cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4 $ make -V PREFIX ...and show the output. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 12:57:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF56B16A4B3 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD0243D67 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:57:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23AB9994BA; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id u6vZ+y4QUZjW; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-50635cb6.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.92.182]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81850997B1F; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <449BE4FC.5040700@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:28 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: consumidor@mundinho.com.br References: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> In-Reply-To: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base-fc4 installing in the wrong path X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gabor@t-hosting.hu List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:57:07 -0000 consumidor wrote: > gentlemen: > > my port of linux_base-fc4 is installing all binaries, libs etc in /usr/local. > at the end of the install it "brands" all my binaries in /usr/local/bin > and /usr/local/sbin, so my applications become unusable. It also installs > libc.so.6 on /usr/local/lib, breaking a lot of stuff. I googled for hours, > to no avail. Would you please help me on getting this done right? I mean, I > presume it should be installed on /usr/compat/linux > It installs right except when you override PREFIX or LINUXBASE. Make sure you don't have anything wrong in /etc/make.conf. Cheers, Gabor Kovesdan From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 13:28:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C36C16A49E for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCA643D45 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:28:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9E4C9309F; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:28:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:28:13 -0500 To: Dmitry Ganenko Message-ID: <20060623132813.GA10248@soaustin.net> References: <885310187.20060623143520@apk-inform.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <885310187.20060623143520@apk-inform.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installation of Oracle10g Express Edition on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:28:14 -0000 On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:35:20PM +0300, Dmitry Ganenko wrote: > 2. We install the right linux_base > > That is why instead of linux_base-8 you should install linux_base-fc4 > (or linux_base-suse-9.2). During the time you were working on this, we switched the default linux_base from the obsolete linux_base-8 to linux_base-fc4. It took extra time due to the fact that we needed to run a regression test with this change, all across an entire ports tree. As to the kernel bugs, I really can't comment. But if you don't get feedback from this forum, you may need to submit PRs (my preference would be individual ones for the individual fixes, so they can be discussed separately, but no matter), with Synopsis lines something on the order of "[linux] fix kernel Linux emulation to fix off-by-one-error" or something similar. Again, I am not in a position to review the kernel changes, but I'd certainly like to see Oracle running on FreeBSD, as a competive thing if nothing else. mcl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 13:29:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6897D16A47E for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC28043D49 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:29:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ftlif-000Blt-77; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:29:09 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ftljl-000CEX-JS; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:30:17 +0400 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> <449BE4FC.5040700@FreeBSD.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:30:17 +0400 In-Reply-To: <449BE4FC.5040700@FreeBSD.org> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6ve?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?sd=E1n's?= message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:28 +0200") Message-ID: <60042918@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: gabor@t-hosting.hu Subject: Re: linux_base-fc4 installing in the wrong path X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:29:11 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:28 +0200 G=E1bor K=F6vesd=E1n wrote: > consumidor wrote: > > gentlemen: > > > > my port of linux_base-fc4 is installing all binaries, libs etc in > > /usr/local. at the end of the install it "brands" all my binaries in ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [1] > > /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin, so my applications become > > unusable. It also installs libc.so.6 on /usr/local/lib, breaking a > > lot of stuff. I googled for hours, to no avail. Would you please > > help me on getting this done right? I mean, I presume it should be > > installed on /usr/compat/linux > >=20=20=20 > It installs right except when you override PREFIX or LINUXBASE. Make > sure you don't have anything wrong in /etc/make.conf. That's true. And [1] shouldn't happen anyway. We do branding at WRKSRC and only then do the installation (for more information look at bsd.linux-rpm.mk). To consumidor@ (deleted from CC): ----- This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: consumidor@mundinho.com.br SMTP error from remote mail server after MAIL FROM:: host mail.mundinho.com.br [200.171.2.205]: 550 5.0.0 Access denied ----- WBR --=20 Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 13:34:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771C716A4A6 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6720943D48 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:34:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7388399917E; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:34:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LOkd8J+t3NRC; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-50635cb6.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.92.182]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019849990DC; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:34:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <449BEDDB.5000207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:34:19 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov References: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> <449BE4FC.5040700@FreeBSD.org> <60042918@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <60042918@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base-fc4 installing in the wrong path X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gabor@t-hosting.hu List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:34:41 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:28 +0200 Gábor Kövesdán wrote: > > >> consumidor wrote: >> >>> gentlemen: >>> >>> my port of linux_base-fc4 is installing all binaries, libs etc in >>> /usr/local. at the end of the install it "brands" all my binaries in >>> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [1] > >>> /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin, so my applications become >>> unusable. It also installs libc.so.6 on /usr/local/lib, breaking a >>> lot of stuff. I googled for hours, to no avail. Would you please >>> help me on getting this done right? I mean, I presume it should be >>> installed on /usr/compat/linux >>> >>> >> It installs right except when you override PREFIX or LINUXBASE. Make >> sure you don't have anything wrong in /etc/make.conf. >> > > That's true. And [1] shouldn't happen anyway. We do branding at WRKSRC > and only then do the installation (for more information look at > bsd.linux-rpm.mk). > > No, branding is done in do-install, see the Makefile for fc4: @${FIND} ${PREFIX}/bin ${PREFIX}/sbin/ ${PREFIX}/usr/bin \ ${PREFIX}/usr/sbin -type f -print0 | ${XARGS} -0 ${FILE} \ | ${GREP} ELF | ${CUT} -d : -f 1 \ | ${XARGS} ${BRANDELF} -t Linux Gabor Kovesdan From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 13:37:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C5916A49A for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D0343D6A for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtlqZ-000Bng-H0; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:37:19 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ftlrf-000CF2-Sk; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:38:27 +0400 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> <449BE4FC.5040700@FreeBSD.org> <60042918@srv.sem.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:38:27 +0400 In-Reply-To: <60042918@srv.sem.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:30:17 +0400") Message-ID: <38602428@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: gabor@t-hosting.hu Subject: Re: linux_base-fc4 installing in the wrong path X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:37:29 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:30:17 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:28 +0200 G=E1bor K=F6vesd=E1n wrote: > > consumidor wrote: > > > gentlemen: > > > > > > my port of linux_base-fc4 is installing all binaries, libs etc in > > > /usr/local. at the end of the install it "brands" all my binaries in > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ = [1] > > > /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin, so my applications become > > > unusable. It also installs libc.so.6 on /usr/local/lib, breaking a > > > lot of stuff. I googled for hours, to no avail. Would you please > > > help me on getting this done right? I mean, I presume it should be > > > installed on /usr/compat/linux > > >=20=20=20 > > It installs right except when you override PREFIX or LINUXBASE. Make > > sure you don't have anything wrong in /etc/make.conf. > That's true. And [1] shouldn't happen anyway. We do branding at WRKSRC > and only then do the installation (for more information look at > bsd.linux-rpm.mk). Oops! This is a base port and doesn't use bsd.linux-rpm.mk. And we really do install and then do the branding. Seems that it should be vice versa to not allow someone to shoot the foot. WBR --=20 Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 14:19:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACB316A492 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2964A43D68 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:19:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5E09F.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.224.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NEDmBm085705; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:13:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5NEJNxL072151; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:19:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:20:04 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Message-ID: <20060623162004.0774490b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20060623132813.GA10248@soaustin.net> References: <885310187.20060623143520@apk-inform.com> <20060623132813.GA10248@soaustin.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.8.19; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installation of Oracle10g Express Edition on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:19:37 -0000 Quoting linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) (Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:28:13 -0500): > Again, I am not in a position to review the kernel changes, but I'd > certainly like to see Oracle running on FreeBSD, as a competive thing > if nothing else. I put the kernel changes on my TODO list. And maybe I try to make a port out of the description (I need something to test the changes, right?). But no promises to the "when"... Bye, Alexander. -- Selling GoodYear Eagle F1 235/40ZR18, 2x 4mm + 2x 5mm, ~130 EUR you have to pick it up between Germany/Saarland and Luxembourg/Capellen http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 18:10:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3732516A57F; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928A843D4C; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:10:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NIAVZc078189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5NIAUhK078188; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Eric Anholt , emulation@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> In-Reply-To: <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:10:34 -0000 On Friday 23 June 2006 13:28, Eric Anholt wrote: = You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. šLIBGL_DEBUG=verbose = is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the = absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. Yes, setting LIBGL_DEBUG to "yes" is how I figured, the i915_dri.so is missing. = We need to get linux_dri updated to a set of recent Mesa binaries. šI wonder = what our current linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? That's the question to the folks at emulation@. CC-ed... -mi From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 18:18:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C2C16A494 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7908843D46 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:18:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqEB-000CRH-Q1; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:17:59 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqFH-000CRU-HN; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:19:07 +0400 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <200606230924.48350.consumidor@mundinho.com.br> <449BE4FC.5040700@FreeBSD.org> <60042918@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <38602428@srv.sem.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:19:07 +0400 In-Reply-To: <38602428@srv.sem.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:38:27 +0400") Message-ID: <13630052@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: gabor@t-hosting.hu Subject: Re: linux_base-fc4 installing in the wrong path X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:18:02 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:38:27 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:30:17 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:56:28 +0200 G=E1bor K=F6vesd=E1n wrote: > > > consumidor wrote: > > > > gentlemen: > > > > > > > > my port of linux_base-fc4 is installing all binaries, libs etc in > > > > /usr/local. at the end of the install it "brands" all my binaries in > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ = [1] > > > > /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin, so my applications become > > > > unusable. It also installs libc.so.6 on /usr/local/lib, breaking a > > > > lot of stuff. I googled for hours, to no avail. Would you please > > > > help me on getting this done right? I mean, I presume it should be > > > > installed on /usr/compat/linux > > > >=20=20=20 > > > It installs right except when you override PREFIX or LINUXBASE. Make > > > sure you don't have anything wrong in /etc/make.conf. > > That's true. And [1] shouldn't happen anyway. We do branding at WRKSRC > > and only then do the installation (for more information look at > > bsd.linux-rpm.mk). > Oops! This is a base port and doesn't use bsd.linux-rpm.mk. And we > really do install and then do the branding. Seems that it should be > vice versa to not allow someone to shoot the foot. Done. WBR --=20 Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 18:19:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C09416A494; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990C143D5A; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:19:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqFj-000CRU-HI; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:19:35 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqGp-000CRa-8O; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:20:43 +0400 To: Mikhail Teterin References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <200606231410.30740@aldan> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:20:43 +0400 In-Reply-To: <200606231410.30740@aldan> (Mikhail Teterin's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400") Message-ID: <47559956@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Eric Anholt , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:19:44 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Friday 23 June 2006 13:28, Eric Anholt wrote: > = You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. šLIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > = is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > = absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. > Yes, setting LIBGL_DEBUG to "yes" is how I figured, the i915_dri.so is > missing. > = We need to get linux_dri updated to a set of recent Mesa binaries. šI wonder > = what our current linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? > That's the question to the folks at emulation@. CC-ed... I've already asked to x11@... WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 18:23:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2151D16A4A6; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B045E43D53; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:23:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqJ1-000CSZ-GT; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:22:59 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqK7-000CRq-7J; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:24:07 +0400 To: Mikhail Teterin References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <200606231410.30740@aldan> <47559956@srv.sem.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:24:07 +0400 In-Reply-To: <47559956@srv.sem.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:20:43 +0400") Message-ID: <81479752@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Eric Anholt , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:23:22 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:20:43 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > On Friday 23 June 2006 13:28, Eric Anholt wrote: > > = You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. šLIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > > = is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > > = absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. > > Yes, setting LIBGL_DEBUG to "yes" is how I figured, the i915_dri.so is > > missing. > > = We need to get linux_dri updated to a set of recent Mesa binaries. šI wonder > > = what our current linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? > > That's the question to the folks at emulation@. CC-ed... > I've already asked to x11@... Doh! It should be "I've already answered to x11@..." Sorry. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 19:44:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C570D16A4A6; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from vonnegut.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3088A43D49; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from vonnegut.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vonnegut.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NJhCuF076592; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:43:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by vonnegut.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5NJhBCa076591; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:43:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) X-Authentication-Warning: vonnegut.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eric@anholt.net using -f From: Eric Anholt To: Boris Samorodov In-Reply-To: <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4" Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:42:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1151091773.7299.2.camel@vonnegut> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:44:45 -0000 --=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 22:07 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:39 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: >=20 > > You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. LIBGL_DEBUG=3Dverbos= e > > is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > > absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. We need to get linux_dri update= d > > to a set of recent Mesa binaries. I wonder what our current >=20 > There are some efforts. :-) But no "when" so far. >=20 > > linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? >=20 > Linux_base doesn't have any X-related stuff. Nore does current linux > X-port (linux-xorg-libs). We do have only graphics/linux_dri based on > XFree86-4.4.0. OK, I checked what FC4 has, and their big xorg RPM is 6.8.2 and contains DRI drivers. However, I don't think we want to use FC4's, not just because of the size of the RPM, but also because the drivers are likely to be too stale. The DRI driver <-> DDX interface breaks backwards compat much more often than the DRI <-> DRM interface (which in theory never breaks). So, we really want some fresh Mesa 6.4.2+ DRI drivers, which we can't get from FC4. So, that means someone needs to get a linux box with suitable glibc again and roll their own like I used to, probably. Or maybe steal binaries from some other distro. Suggestions? --=20 Eric Anholt anholt@FreeBSD.org eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com --=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEnEQ9HUdvYGzw6vcRAvIyAJ9cis1UUtqMpHwHzhMx+vPiACYrrgCdFTkx cQwycxdw5AFv+luTpU6TZh4= =cdBK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 24 11:10:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0B116A47B for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8710043D48 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k5OB9pIJ022596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:09:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.7/8.13.3/Submit) id k5OB9prI022595; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:09:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:09:51 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: Dmitry Ganenko Message-ID: <20060624110951.GA21539@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <885310187.20060623143520@apk-inform.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <885310187.20060623143520@apk-inform.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 147.229.10.14 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installation of Oracle10g Express Edition on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:10:07 -0000 > --- compat/linux/linux_misc.c.orig Fri Apr 1 01:17:42 2005 > +++ compat/linux/linux_misc.c Wed Jun 21 11:14:05 2006 > @@ -711,8 +711,9 @@ linux_times(struct thread *td, struct li > tms.tms_cutime = CONVTCK(td->td_proc->p_stats->p_cru.ru_utime); > tms.tms_cstime = CONVTCK(td->td_proc->p_stats->p_cru.ru_stime); > > - if ((error = copyout(&tms, args->buf, sizeof(tms)))) > - return error; > + if (args->buf != NULL) > + if ((error = copyout(&tms, args->buf, sizeof(tms)))) > + return error; > > microuptime(&tv); > td->td_retval[0] = (int)CONVTCK(tv); this looks ok... a different version was commited > --- compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c.orig Fri Apr 1 01:27:16 2005 > +++ compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c Wed Jun 21 11:14:10 2006 > @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ linprocfs_doprocstat(PFS_FILL_ARGS) > sbuf_printf(sb, "%d", p->p_pid); > #define PS_ADD(name, fmt, arg) sbuf_printf(sb, " " fmt, arg) > PS_ADD("comm", "(%s)", p->p_comm); > - PS_ADD("statr", "%c", '0'); /* XXX */ > + PS_ADD("statr", "%c", 'S'); /* XXX */ > PS_ADD("ppid", "%d", p->p_pptr ? p->p_pptr->p_pid : 0); > PS_ADD("pgrp", "%d", p->p_pgid); > PS_ADD("session", "%d", p->p_session->s_sid); > @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ linprocfs_doprocstat(PFS_FILL_ARGS) > PS_ADD("priority", "%d", 0); /* XXX */ > PS_ADD("timeout", "%u", 0); /* XXX */ > PS_ADD("itrealvalue", "%u", 0); /* XXX */ > - PS_ADD("starttime", "%d", 0); /* XXX */ > + PS_ADD("starttime", "%d", 1); /* XXX */ > PS_ADD("vsize", "%ju", (uintmax_t)kp.ki_size); > PS_ADD("rss", "%ju", P2K((uintmax_t)kp.ki_rssize)); > PS_ADD("rlim", "%u", 0); /* XXX */ this looks "almost ok" netchild@ is working on a patch which puts there real values... thnx for the idea > The third patch corrects a bug (or maybe a feature) in the pseudofs > code (it is necessary for linprocfs). The case is, if you assemble > linprocfs and try such a program, then the read function will read not > 4 as it was asked but one point less, that is, as it is easily > calculated, 3 bytes: > > File test.c > > #include > #include > #include > #include > > main () { > int fd, count; > char buf[10]; > > fd = open("/compat/linux/proc/self/cmdline", O_RDONLY); > count = read(fd, buf, 4); > buf[4] = '\0'; > printf("count = %d, buf = %s\n", count, buf); > } > > I am not sure whether the third correction is absolutely right; > moreover, I am not sure as to its place in the code. This question is > to real kernel hackers. pls, can you explain how this manifest in the oracle? I agree that this is a bug but I am not sure why noone noticed this. the fact is that most people use "cat /proc/x/y" and cat reads 1024 bytes in this case so this doesnt manifest > File patch3 > > --- fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c.orig Mon Sep 6 22:38:01 2004 > +++ fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c Wed Jun 21 11:14:14 2006 > @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ pfs_read(struct vop_read_args *va) > PRELE(proc); > PFS_RETURN (EIO); > } > - sb = sbuf_new(sb, NULL, buflen, 0); > + sb = sbuf_new(sb, NULL, buflen+1, 0); > if (sb == NULL) { > if (proc != NULL) > PRELE(proc); this is wrong... what about this: Index: pseudofs_vnops.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c,v retrieving revision 1.59 diff -u -r1.59 pseudofs_vnops.c --- pseudofs_vnops.c 22 Feb 2006 18:57:49 -0000 1.59 +++ pseudofs_vnops.c 24 Jun 2006 11:08:59 -0000 @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ if (uio->uio_offset < 0 || uio->uio_resid < 0 || (offset = uio->uio_offset) != uio->uio_offset || (resid = uio->uio_resid) != uio->uio_resid || - (buflen = offset + resid) < offset || buflen > INT_MAX) { + (buflen = offset + resid + 1) < offset || buflen > INT_MAX) { if (proc != NULL) PRELE(proc); PFS_RETURN (EINVAL); From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 24 19:17:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688CB16A4A9; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D276C43D60; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:17:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FuDdQ-000FNx-JU; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:17:36 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FuDeS-000EFp-R9; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:18:40 +0400 To: Eric Anholt References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <1151091773.7299.2.camel@vonnegut> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:18:40 +0400 In-Reply-To: <1151091773.7299.2.camel@vonnegut> (Eric Anholt's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:42:53 -0700") Message-ID: <15386511@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:17:45 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:42:53 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 22:07 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:39 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > > You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > > > is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > > > absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. We need to get linux_dri updated > > > to a set of recent Mesa binaries. I wonder what our current > > > > There are some efforts. :-) But no "when" so far. > > > > > linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? > > > > Linux_base doesn't have any X-related stuff. Nore does current linux > > X-port (linux-xorg-libs). We do have only graphics/linux_dri based on > > XFree86-4.4.0. > OK, I checked what FC4 has, and their big xorg RPM is 6.8.2 and contains > DRI drivers. However, I don't think we want to use FC4's, not just > because of the size of the RPM, but also because the drivers are likely > to be too stale. The DRI driver <-> DDX interface breaks backwards > compat much more often than the DRI <-> DRM interface (which in theory > never breaks). So, we really want some fresh Mesa 6.4.2+ DRI drivers, > which we can't get from FC4. > So, that means someone needs to get a linux box with suitable glibc > again and roll their own like I used to, probably. Or maybe steal > binaries from some other distro. Suggestions? The only one candidate I've found so far is Mesa-6.4.2-19.i586.rpm from OpenSuSE: ftp://ftp.chg.ru/.1/Linux/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.1/inst-source/suse/i586/Mesa-6.4.2-19.i586.rpm I'll try to test it soon. Anybody willing may beat me at testing. ;-) WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider