From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 15 09:45:45 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: java@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8237716A41F
	for <java@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:45:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from hwh@gddsn.org.cn)
Received: from gddsn.org.cn (gddsn.org.cn [218.19.164.145])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E95043D46
	for <java@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:45:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from hwh@gddsn.org.cn)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [218.19.185.223])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by gddsn.org.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0B138CB66;
	Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:45:42 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <43CA19C4.8050202@gddsn.org.cn>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:45:40 +0800
From: Huang wen hui <hwh@gddsn.org.cn>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051212)
X-Accept-Language: zh-cn,zh
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Huang wen hui <hwh@gddsn.org.cn>
References: <43C92741.7000803@gddsn.org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <43C92741.7000803@gddsn.org.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: java@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Performance patch for jdk1.5.0/amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:45:45 -0000

Huang wen hui wrote:

>hi,
>I recently notice that jdk1.5.0-p2/amd64 is slower than jdk1.5.0-p2/i386
>on the same hardware in some situation.
>  
>
I only got this problem on EM64T box, the "real" amd64 box do not affect.