From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 5 02:47:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EF216A6A1; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 02:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dsledge@appriss.com) Received: from intexch02.int.appriss.com (intexch02.int.appriss.com [63.126.72.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4208D43EF7; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 02:46:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsledge@appriss.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 21:43:15 -0500 Message-ID: <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) Thread-Index: AccAR8WGVBQryUx0QJe11Fw8jqMiRAAG/3xRAAgYXU4= References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp><768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com><20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost><20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp><454AC581.2080503@appriss.com><20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net><20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> From: "David Sledge" To: "David Sledge" , "Alexander Kabaev" , "Thomas Gellekum" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 02:47:59 -0000 > Ok, I just fixed the static mozilla references in the = post-patch-plugins-swt-gtk-make_freebsd.mak patch file. > I will upload = the new shar file to the server Monday morning. I don't have access to = the server right now. > Eclipse still does not run properly when compiled against firefox = (1.5.0_07). It will compile with=20 > WITH_MOZILLA=3Dfirefox but eclipse will crash during runtime when it = trys to display the JavaDoc when a keyword > like String is hovered over = in the editor. Maybe this is fixed with the new version of firefox = (2.0_1). I am > upgrading to it now and will test against it as soon as = its ready. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-eclipse-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Same problem exist with Firefox 2.0_1. You have to use mozilla for = eclipse to work correctly. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 5 08:18:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F3716A76A for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 08:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hardsu@cargolink.com) Received: from cargolink.com (62-43-83-194.user.ono.com [62.43.83.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBBFC43D46 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 08:18:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hardsu@cargolink.com) Message-ID: <06d901c70024$3ddb73a0$8976f8f0@vapsz> From: "Essie Reillya" To: Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 09:18:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: No Guesswork Investing is X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Essie Reillya List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:18:29 -0000 LISTEN UP This advisory is based on exclusive insiders/agents information. (AVLN.OB) Avalon Energy Corporation has an undivided 85% working interest in the Shotgun Draw Prospect in the prolific natural gas producing Uinta Basin , located in the US Rockies, Utah . The lease comprises 13,189 acres with a potential 4 TCF recoverable gas and is overpressured by a 0.55 . 0.85 gradient. ON MONDAY NOV 6th: at 11 cents its a STEAL - Volume: 389,001 - Volume: + 50% - Price: +5.77% The key to any tade is buying low and selling high, WELL the energy market has bottomed out and time to get in is now. We specialise in calling market bottom and when it comes to energy THIS IS THE BOTTOM, SO GET IN FOLKS POWERHOUSE COMPANY POWERHOUSE COMPANY Two days after the accident, the Federal Aviation Administration ordered small, fixed-wing planes not to fly over the East River unless the pilot is in contact with air traffic controllers. District Attorney-elect Rod Pacheco said the evidence against Oyler was "overwhelming," but he did not disclose a motive and would not say what led investigators to Oyler. Small planes could previously fly below 1,100 feet along the river without filing flight plans or checking in with air traffic control. The FAA said the rule change -- a temporary one -- was made for safety reasons. Three firefighters died when the flames swept over their truck, and a fourth died soon after at a hospital. A fifth was taken off life support and died this week. The last time so many firefighters were killed battling a wildfire was July 1994, when 14 were killed near Glenwood Springs, Colorado, according to the National Interagency Fire Center. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 5 08:20:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F5916AD9F for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 08:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from izumtiih@cargolink.com) Received: from cargolink.com (62-43-83-194.user.ono.com [62.43.83.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71F9243D60 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 08:20:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from izumtiih@cargolink.com) Message-ID: <09dd01c70082$3cee22b0$1448b2e0@dmayac> From: "Beatrice Rutledge" To: Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 09:20:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Powerhouse Investment opportunity mc X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Beatrice Rutledge List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:20:40 -0000 THIS ONE IS BEING PROMOTED, TAKE ADVANTAGE This advisory is based on exclusive insiders/agents information. (AVLN.OB) Avalon Energy Corporation has an undivided 85% working interest in the Shotgun Draw Prospect in the prolific natural gas producing Uinta Basin , located in the US Rockies, Utah . The lease comprises 13,189 acres with a potential 4 TCF recoverable gas and is overpressured by a 0.55 . 0.85 gradient. ON MONDAY NOV 6th: at 11 cents its a STEAL - Volume: 389,001 - Volume: + 50% - Price: +5.77% The key to any tade is buying low and selling high, WELL the energy market has bottomed out and time to get in is now. We specialise in calling market bottom and when it comes to energy THIS IS THE BOTTOM, SO GET IN FOLKS TRUE RED WHITE AND BLUE COMPANY TRUE RED WHITE AND BLUE COMPANY Last week's fire was stoked by Santa Ana winds as it swept southwest through the mountains about 90 miles east of Los Angeles. The flames overran the fire crew, destroyed 34 homes and charred more than 60 square miles before being contained Monday. President Bush, working a southwest Missouri campaign crowd like a yell leader, blasted Democrats on Friday, saying they have no plan to keep Americans safe from terrorists. If the pilot used the full width of the river to turn, he would have had 2,100 feet, the NTSB said. Instead, the pilot was flying closer to the middle of the river, leaving a smaller margin for error, the staff report said. Mourners honored the firefighters killed by the California arson fire as the first of five funerals began Friday, and praised authorities for charging the man accused of starting that fire with murder. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 5 10:50:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A1016A403 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-java@oliverlietz.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5FF43D46 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:50:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-java@oliverlietz.de) Received: from [83.129.29.214] (helo=madness.oliverlietz.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwh2-1GgfaK1KqU-0001Ea; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:50:43 +0100 From: Oliver Lietz To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:50:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061104232154.7319c35b@localhost> <200611041750.19726.freebsd-java@oliverlietz.de> <20061105092355.7d1d38ea@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20061105092355.7d1d38ea@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611051150.36677.freebsd-java@oliverlietz.de> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:e601c222b577d6a77c17537a75592542 Cc: Norberto Meijome Subject: Re: eclipse-3.2.1 port : success [was: failure building] X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 10:50:45 -0000 Am Samstag, 4. November 2006 23:23 schrieb Norberto Meijome: > On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 17:50:18 +0100 > > Oliver Lietz wrote: > > I had lots of type safety warnings when compiling but eclipse built and > > runs fine (6.1/i386, all ports up to date). > > Hi Oliver, > what version of the gnome-* ports do you have installed? gnome-icon-theme-2.16.0.1_1 gnome-keyring-0.6.0 gnome-mime-data-2.4.2_2 gnome-vfs-2.16.1 gnome_subr-1.0 gnomehier-2.2 libgnome-2.16.0 libgnomecanvas-2.14.0_2 libgnomeui-2.16.1 hth, Oliver From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 5 15:42:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5348A16A40F for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kkuehl@cisco.com) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA28343D46 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:42:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kkuehl@cisco.com) Received: from sj-dkim-7.cisco.com ([171.68.10.88]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2006 07:42:52 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAE6TTUWrRApY/2dsb2JhbAA X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,388,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="1862106806:sNHT23094168" Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-7.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kA5FgqDf016111 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 07:42:52 -0800 Received: from kkuehl-bsd.cisco.com (kkuehl-bsd.cisco.com [10.25.80.156]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with SMTP id kA5FgpbF017640 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 07:42:51 -0800 (PST) From: Kirby Kuehl Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc. To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:43:19 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611050943.20140.kkuehl@cisco.com> DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=254; t=1162741372; x=1163605372; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim7002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=kkuehl@cisco.com; z=From:Kirby=20Kuehl=20 |Subject:re=3A=20firefox-2.0_1, =201=20java=20plugin=20not=20working=20with=20diab lo-jre-1.5.0.07.01; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DTtK4xAEGJmuBbFQcOxSu6XWH8JE=3D; b=sXMB5Y6bsN7Od+k9W5Vhet6wYYOL3fqhr+Gyb+L6hM8uy2+SAvuVb7PTnIsuzBdAEiamKQju 4euyb9YIkoYftHRIyPPNhS1SfYtugosNxm+DoSctIOK0vuP1rH30U0YI; Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-7.cisco.com; header.From=kkuehl@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; ); Subject: re: firefox-2.0_1, 1 java plugin not working with diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:42:53 -0000 Just an FYI, I installed firefox-1.5.0.7_1,2 along side of firefox-2.0_1,1 and java works fine in firefox-1.5.0.7_1,2 without any changes to the configuration in my previous email. linux-firefox-2.0 also doesn't seem to work with regards to java. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 5 18:59:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF59F16A40F for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 18:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Thomas.Gellekum@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8110A43D88 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 18:58:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Thomas.Gellekum@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Nov 2006 18:58:33 -0000 Received: from bras-co-85-197-1-129.westend.de (EHLO hanbruch.tg.intern) [85.197.1.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 05 Nov 2006 19:58:33 +0100 X-Authenticated: #18235045 To: "David Sledge" References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> From: Thomas Gellekum In-Reply-To: <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> Date: 05 Nov 2006 19:58:30 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Emacs Gnus X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Thomas Gellekum , freebsd-java@freebsd.org, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 18:59:15 -0000 "David Sledge" writes: > Same problem exist with Firefox 2.0_1. You have to use mozilla for eclipse to work correctly. Yup, installing mozilla lets eclipse compile. As for the "work correctly" part, I'll just accept it as it is for now. I don't have the time to dig into these issues, unfortunately. Thanks for the help, tg From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 5 19:30:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACCD16A415 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C3843D53 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:30:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from jill.exit.com (jill.exit.com [206.223.0.4]) by tinker.exit.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kA5JUVF7068188 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:30:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from jill.exit.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jill.exit.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kA5JUVKp086074 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:30:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by jill.exit.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id kA5JUVRH086073 for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:30:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) X-Authentication-Warning: jill.exit.com: frank set sender to frank@exit.com using -f From: Frank Mayhar To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-a68ytHV7rfCJ8gngP4CH" Organization: Exit Consulting Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:30:30 -0800 Message-Id: <1162755030.85997.4.camel@jill.exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2163/Sun Nov 5 09:42:14 2006 on tinker.exit.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x44f112c2, pid=67567, tid=0x805c000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@exit.com List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 19:30:33 -0000 --=-a68ytHV7rfCJ8gngP4CH Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit # # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x44f112c2, pid=67567, tid=0x805c000 # # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (diablo-1.5.0_07-b01 mixed mode) # Problematic frame: # C [libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0+0x1d12c2] gtk_tree_view_set_model+0x9ba # # An error report file with more information is saved as hs_err_pid67567.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please write # a letter to freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org mailing list # I'll keep the core around for a couple of days, just in case. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/ --=-a68ytHV7rfCJ8gngP4CH-- From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 5 20:15:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2359016A4E7 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 20:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlusetti@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6B043D7C for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 20:14:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlusetti@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so2270213nfe for ; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 12:14:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rbt8/Nv7PyQZ5HsSOcV4oGhDFfIr5MWJEpb6coULYxNdTtKuGoxS2t4T52R2T3CRCR0dhCyTgqO6JsNiD0zk2Zb4YNNNnR24E6QZZBy1OLlhj/EpdRgeZGSOT/4AZxyKJPaIHSNBX5ypbFk9PGHZWcWwre8YCRriSUq/+KIZYXo= Received: by 10.82.164.9 with SMTP id m9mr1157512bue.1162757692526; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 12:14:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.184.15 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:14:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 21:14:52 +0100 From: "Massimo Lusetti" To: "David Sledge" In-Reply-To: <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> Cc: Thomas Gellekum , freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 20:15:46 -0000 On 11/5/06, David Sledge wrote: > Same problem exist with Firefox 2.0_1. You have to use mozilla for eclipse to work correctly. So what's the deal of having it WITHOUT_MOZILLA=yes ? -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 6 10:59:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A92516A40F for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from melon.pingpong.net (melon.pingpong.net [195.178.174.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED87D43D64 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:59:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75124534C8; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:56:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melon.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06221-02-39; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:56:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.187] (unknown [213.136.40.204]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07198534C4; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:56:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:56:55 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: Kirby Kuehl , freebsd-java@freebsd.org, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky Message-ID: <1182EFD2E1609B21F14ABD46@rambutan.pingpong.net> In-Reply-To: <200611050943.20140.kkuehl@cisco.com> References: <200611050943.20140.kkuehl@cisco.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pingpong.net Cc: Subject: re: firefox-2.0_1, 1 java plugin not working with diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 10:59:29 -0000 --On s=F6ndag, november 05, 2006 09.43.19 -0600 Kirby Kuehl=20 wrote: > Just an FYI, I installed firefox-1.5.0.7_1,2 along side of > firefox-2.0_1,1 and java works fine in firefox-1.5.0.7_1,2 without any > changes to the configuration in my previous email. linux-firefox-2.0 > also doesn't seem to work with regards to java. Same here. It seems there is some bad argument? Here's what firefox says: --- Exec of "/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/bin/java_vm" failed: Invalid=20 argument ** (Gecko:80803): WARNING **: Serious fd usage error 20 ** (Gecko:80803): WARNING **: Serious fd usage error 18 Could not read ack from child process Plugin: Java VM process has died. plugin: java process exited with status 6 Could not start JavaVM! VM did not start up properly Exec of "/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/jre/bin/java_vm" failed: Invalid=20 argument ** (Gecko:80804): WARNING **: Serious fd usage error 20 ** (Gecko:80804): WARNING **: Serious fd usage error 18 Could not read ack from child process Plugin: Java VM process has died. plugin: java process exited with status 6 Could not start JavaVM! VM did not start up properly --- From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 6 11:08:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0734716A513 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EA043D45 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:08:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kA6B80hx013934 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:08:00 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kA6B7xO2013930 for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:07:59 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:07:59 GMT Message-Id: <200611061107.kA6B7xO2013930@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: linimon set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:08:01 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s ports/60083 java Unsafe use of getaddrinfo in jvm 1.4.2-p5 o java/66151 java JBuilderX (sun jvm 1.4.1 builtin) crashes on 4.9 works f java/72151 java JVM crash on 5.2.1-R o java/76631 java any port linux-*-jdk12 will core dump if using linux_b o ports/100529 java linux-sun-jdk1.4.2_12 coredumps on FreeBSD 4.x o java/104627 java Makefile jdk14 broken 6 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f ports/56928 java jce-aba port should install to $JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/ext f java/62837 java linux-sun-jdk14 executables hang with COMPAT_LINUX in o ports/84742 java make ports/java/jdk14 use dynamic Motif librarires f ports/91244 java Bad instruction on making process of jdk14 o java/97461 java Diablo JDK does not report Update level in a format su 5 problems total. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 6 15:54:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D1516A412 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from melon.pingpong.net (melon.pingpong.net [195.178.174.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214A043D86 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21BE50EEB for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:54:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melon.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 68553-01-54 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:54:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.187] (unknown [213.136.40.204]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812E850E01 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:54:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:54:14 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <61030C03A4548B023E87D0D0@rambutan.pingpong.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pingpong.net Subject: updating eclipse plugins' ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:54:26 -0000 Hi! I've updated the eclipse-EPIC (checking with maintainer before I commit), and am working on the eclipse-cdt port. Is anyone else doing work on any eclipse plugin port? /Palle From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 6 23:04:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8337F16A4A0; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 23:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dsledge@appriss.com) Received: from intexch02.int.appriss.com (intexch02.int.appriss.com [63.126.72.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62CE43D62; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 23:04:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsledge@appriss.com) Received: from [10.11.3.10] ([10.11.3.10]) by intexch02.int.appriss.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:04:07 -0500 Message-ID: <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:04:07 -0500 From: David Sledge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061024) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Massimo Lusetti References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2006 23:04:07.0571 (UTC) FILETIME=[DCC3AE30:01C701F7] Cc: Thomas Gellekum , freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:04:11 -0000 Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On 11/5/06, David Sledge wrote: > >> Same problem exist with Firefox 2.0_1. You have to use mozilla for >> eclipse to work correctly. > > So what's the deal of having it WITHOUT_MOZILLA=yes ? > You should be able to compile without mozilla all together and then specify an external web browser in eclipse. Of-course you will loose the features in eclipse that rely on the embedded browser. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 7 04:40:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAE416A407 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 04:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721BF43D5C for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 04:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 17894 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2006 15:40:42 +1100 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO localhost) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 7 Nov 2006 15:40:42 +1100 Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:40:36 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: Norberto Meijome Message-ID: <20061107154036.17c4d762@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20061104232154.7319c35b@localhost> References: <20061104232154.7319c35b@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: SOLVED : Re: eclipse-3.2.1 port : failure building X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 04:40:44 -0000 On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 23:21:54 +1100 Norberto Meijome wrote: > Hi everyone, > first of all, thank you David Sledge for the port, and thanks to everyone who > replied to my lost post querying about eclipse 3.2. > > When I try to compile eclipse 3.2 from /usr/ports/java/eclipse, it builds ok > all the way through to ejc.jar: > [....] > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Total time: 15 seconds > [echo] TARGET: compiler2 > [echo] compilerArg -encoding ISO-8859-1 > [echo] build compiler org.eclipse.jdt.core.JDTCompilerAdapter > [echo] UPDATE ecj.jar > > but then : > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Total time: 14 seconds > [echo] Deleting jars to recompile... > [echo] Compiling... > [javac] ---------- > [javac] 1. WARNING > in /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/plugins/org.eclipse.swt/Eclipse > SWT/common/org/eclipse/swt/graphics/ImageLoader.java [javac] (at line 271) > [javac] imageLoaderListeners.addElement(listener); [javac] > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [javac] Type safety: The method > addElement(Object) belongs to the raw type Vector. References to generic type > Vector should be parameterized [javac] ---------- [javac] ---------- > [javac] 2. WARNING > in /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/plugins/org.eclipse.swt/Eclipse > SWT/motif/org/eclipse/swt/widgets/FontDialog.java [javac] (at line 162) > [javac] characterSets.put (charSetName, charSet); [javac] > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [javac] Type safety: The method > put(Object, Object) belongs to the raw type Hashtable. References to generic > type Hashtable should be parameterized [javac] ---------- [javac] 3. > WARNING in /usr/ports/java/eclipse/work/plugins/org.eclipse.swt/Eclipse > SWT/motif/org/eclipse/swt/widgets/FontDialog.java [javac] (at line 169) > [javac] charSet.put (faceName, faceSet); > > and on that vein till the end... I have a complete log of it at > > http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/eclipse/eclipse_build_20061104.log.bz2 > > ( 407K compressed, 11 MB uncompressed). > > The same happens whether I use portupgrade or build by hand > > Any and all help greatly appreciated :) > > System details: > > FreeBSD ayiin.xxxx 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #17: > Tue Oct 31 11:23:02 EST 2006 > root@ayiin.xxxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AYIIN i386 > > I've got an up to date ports tree as at right now ( Sat Nov 4 23:05:35 EST > 2006 , EST == GMT +11). I use portsnap. > > My java related ports are : > # pkg_info | grep jdk > diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01 Java Development Kit 1.5.0_07.01 > linux-blackdown-jdk-1.4.2_3 Blackdown Java Development Kit 1.4 for Linux > > # cat /usr/local/etc/javavms > /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java # DiabloCaffe1.5.0 > /usr/local/linux-blackdown-jdk1.4.2/bin/java # Linux-Blackdown-JDK1.4.2 > > > $ cat /usr/local/etc/javavm_opts.conf > [... comments ...] > JAVAVM_OPTS_diablo_jdk1_5_0_java=-XX:+UseMembar > > > All my other ports are up to date. I have firefox 2.0 native installed (as > prerequisite for eclipse + other ports), and linux-firefox-2, which I use for > actual browsing (it doesn't include the gecko component used by other ports). > ok, solved for now. I left everything the same (other than some more port updates, but i'm pretty certain they aren't related to this). cd /usr/ports/java/eclipse export WITHOUT_MOZILLA=yes make sudo make deinstall sudo make package and it seems to be working quite ok so far. thanks! _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 7 13:49:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBC716A47E for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlusetti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B7243D72 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:49:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlusetti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1035270uge for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:49:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W4Vjef5dcQgaXfObF1UcVuDMhkSL3tBe72yXDlE1KSbUcME7rDSXhZClYh8tiQyOT13fosirg4gV5cNF3Tf6MxAf8ruVJTH0nSAp4uZBtlo7RDX80jXjeXpr5JUO3DfyodeZo/UelGEq03U3VYVPYL9rxOZnRXmFaVfNhmHWwmk= Received: by 10.82.147.6 with SMTP id u6mr942513bud.1162907340588; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:49:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.184.15 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 05:49:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:49:00 +0100 From: "Massimo Lusetti" To: "David Sledge" In-Reply-To: <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> Cc: Thomas Gellekum , freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:49:04 -0000 On 11/7/06, David Sledge wrote: > You should be able to compile without mozilla all together and then > specify an external web browser in eclipse. Of-course you will loose the > features in eclipse that rely on the embedded browser. Well, portaudit complains about having mozilla in so i leave it out, no issues so far. BTW, thanks very much for this port! -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 7 23:04:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D7716A415 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 23:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3A543D55 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 23:04:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 15364 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 10:04:54 +1100 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO localhost) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 10:04:54 +1100 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:04:49 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: David Sledge Message-ID: <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost> In-Reply-To: <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Massimo Lusetti , Thomas Gellekum , freebsd-java@freebsd.org, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:04:56 -0000 On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:04:07 -0500 David Sledge wrote: > Massimo Lusetti wrote: > > On 11/5/06, David Sledge wrote: > > > >> Same problem exist with Firefox 2.0_1. You have to use mozilla for > >> eclipse to work correctly. > > > > So what's the deal of having it WITHOUT_MOZILLA=yes ? > > > > You should be able to compile without mozilla all together and then > specify an external web browser in eclipse. Of-course you will loose the > features in eclipse that rely on the embedded browser. How feasible would be to include with the port the mozilla binary blobs ? maybe accessible via a tunable WITH_MOZILLA_BLOBS=yes just a thought... _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go." Oscar Wilde I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 7 23:44:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA7D16A415; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 23:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B53743D49; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 23:44:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2006 18:44:08 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MML99697; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:44:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2006 18:44:01 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,398,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="308176065:sNHT31407796" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17745.6347.242231.222424@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:37:47 -0500 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost> References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=36/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=suspect(1), refid=str=0001.0A090207.455119CB.001F,ss=2,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.121/2006-09-27 Cc: Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:44:11 -0000 Norberto Meijome writes: > > You should be able to compile without mozilla all together and then > > specify an external web browser in eclipse. Of-course you will loose the > > features in eclipse that rely on the embedded browser. > > How feasible would be to include with the port the mozilla binary > blobs ? maybe accessible via a tunable WITH_MOZILLA_BLOBS=yes Given that mozilla/mozilla is a dead branch, wouldn't a better question be "When are things going to be updated to understand mozilla/firefox and mozilla/seamonkey?"? I understand this is not a trivial process ... on the other hand Firefox has been out for how many years? Robert Huff* * - who's getting @!#$%^&* tired of installing/deinstalling mozilla/mozilla everytime somebody needs this build-depends. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 8 03:01:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A8F16A58E for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 03:01:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6935843D55 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 03:01:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 6749 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 14:01:39 +1100 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO localhost) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 14:01:39 +1100 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:01:35 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome To: Robert Huff Message-ID: <20061108140135.07363e3f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <17745.6347.242231.222424@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost> <17745.6347.242231.222424@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:01:43 -0000 On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:37:47 -0500 Robert Huff wrote: > Given that mozilla/mozilla is a dead branch, wouldn't a better > question be "When are things going to be updated to understand > mozilla/firefox and mozilla/seamonkey?"? I understand this is not a > trivial process ... on the other hand Firefox has been out for how > many years? > true, i stand corrected :)... but this change would be an overall 'eclipse' change, rather than a 'eclipse under freebsd' issue. Hence what I was suggesting , simply to have the moz binaries needed installed via the port just to keep eclipse happy.... > > * - who's getting @!#$%^&* tired of installing/deinstalling > mozilla/mozilla everytime somebody needs this build-depends. export WITHOUT_MOZILLA=true make .... _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Said Hamlet to Ophelia,"I'll do a sketch of thee. What kind of pencil shall I use,2B or not 2B?" Hamlet, by Spike Milligan I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 8 05:49:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6105A16A47B; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AFF43D5E; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:49:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2006 00:49:19 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,399,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="342529792:sNHT27720940" Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id HNO32001; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 00:49:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2006 00:49:18 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,399,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="308319662:sNHT37483052" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17745.28255.205255.691850@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 00:42:55 -0500 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061108140135.07363e3f@localhost> References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost> <17745.6347.242231.222424@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20061108140135.07363e3f@localhost> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=36/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=suspect(1), refid=str=0001.0A090204.45516F63.0007,ss=2,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.121/2006-09-27 Cc: Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 05:49:22 -0000 Norberto Meijome writes: > > * - who's getting @!#$%^&* tired of installing/deinstalling > > mozilla/mozilla everytime somebody needs this build-depends. > > export WITHOUT_MOZILLA=true Assumes you're willing to lose the associated functionality. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 8 06:25:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA7116A4C2; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 06:25:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dsledge@appriss.com) Received: from intexch02.int.appriss.com (intexch02.int.appriss.com [63.126.72.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9600E43D6B; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 06:25:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsledge@appriss.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 01:25:31 -0500 Message-ID: <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205531@intexch02.int.appriss.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) Thread-Index: AccC4mODwXPr5OwbTxy7ZMdG7ySCbgAFoxdZ References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp><768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com><20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost><20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp><454AC581.2080503@appriss.com><20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net><20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net><768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com><768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com><454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost><17745.6347.242231.222424@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20061108140135.07363e3f@localhost> From: "David Sledge" To: "Norberto Meijome" , "Robert Huff" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:25:37 -0000 > > Given that mozilla/mozilla is a dead branch, wouldn't a better > > question be "When are things going to be updated to understand > > mozilla/firefox and mozilla/seamonkey?"? I understand this is not a > > trivial process ... on the other hand Firefox has been out for how > > many years? > >=20 > true, i stand corrected :)... but this change would be an overall = 'eclipse' > change, rather than a 'eclipse under freebsd' issue. Hence what I was > suggesting , simply to have the moz binaries needed installed via the = port just > to keep eclipse happy....=20 I am trying to find a way to make eclipse work with firefox, of-course I = will take as much help as I can get :). I found the comment below on the = eclipse site (SWT FAQ). I am looking at the firefox port now to see how = it compiles. * Firefox can be used with Eclipse 3.1 and newer (Linux only), provided = that it has been compiled with linkable Gecko libraries. It is important = to note that Firefox downloads from mozilla.org currently do not satisfy = this criteria, but Firefox installations that are included in major = Linux distributions often do in the absence of a XULRunner installation. = Attempting to use a statically-linked Firefox install will display the = error message "No more handles [NS_InitEmbedding...error -2147221164]". * XULRunner can be used with Eclipse 3.2.1 and newer From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 8 08:19:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847B916A407 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:19:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlusetti@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EA143D53 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:19:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlusetti@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p77so130137nfc for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:19:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jXWpJeRqCbT6RCP4fBx2FU+cyNcjxhB+4vBV5UrcBZqhL6vN9wcWjFupMlx1Oqd6VPNn1mDqB8f/mtD68R2FJufhJihbOxSxHAcYDEfnkAZKfmTzEt0cYsY1mLj1CLV+jgyP7Q3Ql36xxJPLlszGfMeVSDB73Dl4FIy8ikuEIrE= Received: by 10.82.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr1672815buc.1162973946246; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:19:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.184.15 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 00:19:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:19:06 +0100 From: "Massimo Lusetti" To: "Robert Huff" In-Reply-To: <17745.28255.205255.691850@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost> <17745.6347.242231.222424@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20061108140135.07363e3f@localhost> <17745.28255.205255.691850@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:19:08 -0000 On 11/8/06, Robert Huff wrote: > Assumes you're willing to lose the associated functionality. We all understand that would be great to have it use firefox or something like but, tell me one you can't live without. -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 8 15:22:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BF016A407; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E22E43D45; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:21:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2006 10:21:57 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,401,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="342737772:sNHT3360707108" Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id HNQ90623; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:21:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2006 10:21:33 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,401,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="308465862:sNHT28387564" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17745.62576.469039.953141@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:14:56 -0500 To: , In-Reply-To: <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205531@intexch02.int.appriss.com> References: <20061018.220822.74673558.ken@tydfam.jp> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20550D@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <20061103122425.3146dadc@localhost> <20061103.120801.97298272.ken@tydfam.jp> <454AC581.2080503@appriss.com> <20061103211431.5a2af48b@kan.dnsalias.net> <20061104143059.3c2e2763@kan.dnsalias.net> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205529@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF20552F@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <454FBF67.7010304@appriss.com> <20061108100449.19df1bae@localhost> <17745.6347.242231.222424@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20061108140135.07363e3f@localhost> <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF205531@intexch02.int.appriss.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=36/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=suspect(1), refid=str=0001.0A090209.4551F595.009C,ss=2,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.121/2006-09-27 Cc: Subject: RE: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:22:00 -0000 David Sledge writes: > I am trying to find a way to make eclipse work with firefox, > of-course I will take as much help as I can get :). I found the > comment below on the eclipse site (SWT FAQ). I am looking at the > firefox port now to see how it compiles. > > * Firefox can be used with Eclipse 3.1 and newer (Linux only), > provided that it has been compiled with linkable Gecko > libraries. It is important to note that Firefox downloads from > mozilla.org currently do not satisfy this criteria, but Firefox > installations that are included in major Linux distributions > often do in the absence of a XULRunner installation. Attempting > to use a statically-linked Firefox install will display the error > message "No more handles [NS_InitEmbedding...error > -2147221164]". I have absolutely no idea how a "linkable Gecko library" differs from (presumably) a non-linkable one. Maybe we should talk to mozilla@, and see if they can make this happen? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 10:20:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A0616A407 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB9343D53 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:20:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kAAAKK0Y060607 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:20:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kAAAKKDc060606; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:20:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:20:20 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200611101020.kAAAKKDc060606@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, rafal kotusiewicz Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D379916A412 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [216.136.204.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A132D43D46 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:13:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAAAD4ia020778 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:13:04 GMT (envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id kAAAD4S1020777; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:13:04 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <200611101013.kAAAD4S1020777@www.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:13:04 GMT From: rafal kotusiewicz To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.0 Cc: Subject: java/105369: problem with port diablo-jdk15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:20:23 -0000 >Number: 105369 >Category: java >Synopsis: problem with port diablo-jdk15 >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-java >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: maintainer-update >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Nov 10 10:20:19 GMT 2006 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: rafal kotusiewicz >Release: 6.2 Beta 2 >Organization: gdp.pl >Environment: all >Description: When I tried install java from port diablo-jdk15 then I have a problem. Port installer suggest me get java port v. 1.5.0_07-b00 (tgz) from http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml. When I go to this url, I'm not found this package, only 1.5.0_07-b01. >How-To-Repeat: as root %cd /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15/ && make install >Fix: After downloaded available version of port I changed the checksums of archives (MD5 and sha256) and rename the archive. Then make install work nicely but is not best of method :) >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 13:40:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DE216A416 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:40:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FC643D45 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:40:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kAADeSTp077492 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:40:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kAADeSCH077491; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:40:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:40:28 GMT Message-Id: <200611101340.kAADeSCH077491@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org From: Russell Francis Cc: Subject: Re: java/105369: problem with port diablo-jdk X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Russell Francis List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:40:28 -0000 The following reply was made to PR java/105369; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Russell Francis To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, r.kotusiewicz@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: java/105369: problem with port diablo-jdk Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:33:01 -0500 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050906050607040308080701 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rafal, Are you sure that you have the latest ports tree? What is the version string at the top of the Makefile in the ports/diablo-jdk15/Makefile? # $FreeBSD: ports/java/diablo-jdk15/Makefile,v 1.5 2006/11/06 19:47:17 glewis Exp $ Thanks, Russ --------------050906050607040308080701 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="rfrancis.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rfrancis.vcf" begin:vcard fn:Russell Francis n:Francis;Russell org:Electronic Vision adr:;;5 Depot Street;Athens;OH;45701;US email;internet:rfrancis@ev.net title:Software Engineer tel;work:1-(740)-592-2433 x 18 tel;fax:1-(740)-592-2650 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.ev.net/ version:2.1 end:vcard --------------050906050607040308080701-- From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 20:40:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2410816A4B3 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089B743DD8 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:38:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (rhea.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.171]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0D55C1B46 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:38:07 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B804780002 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:38:05 +0200 (EET) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rhea [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23438-07 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:38:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [150.140.143.234]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FB180001 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:38:04 +0200 (EET) Received: by ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A318E54; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:37:14 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:37:14 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: NetCInS Lab., C.E.I.D., U. of Patras, Greece WWW-Homepage: http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9680 60A7 DE60 0298 B1F0 9B22 9BA2 7569 CF95 160A Office-Phone: +30-2610-996919 Office-Fax: +30-2610-969011 GPS-Info: 38.31N, 21.82E User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:40:07 -0000 Hi all. I've spent the last week or so running the exact same Java code on the exact same hardware, under different OSs. The code i'm running is heavily cpu-bound (no i/o other than light logging), uses a lot of memory (~1G), and does not rely on threading libraries (i.e. the program creates two threads when it starts and that's all about it). I'm running a small and a large version of the program (wrt memory requirements and run-time). The average execution time for the small version goes from ~200'' under win32, to ~220'' under linux, and to ~800'' under freebsd. For the large version, the numbers are ~1600'' for win32, ~1800'' for linux, and ~4700'' for freebsd. This is all on a 1.7GHz Pentium-M laptop with 1G RAM (dmesg at http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/Computers/dmesgs/ace.dmesg), running -current as of Sep 29. The JDKs tested are diablo-jdk15 (1.5.0.07.01) and sun-jdk15 (1.5.0p6) for FreeBSD, and sun-jdk15 (1.5.0_07) for linux and win32. Does anybody else see such a performance drop across OSs? Is there some specific (known) reason why freebsd lags behind the other two OSs by this 3x-4x factor? Any pointers as to some (sysctl or other) knob I've missed? Thanks in advance. \n\n From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 20:54:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DDD16A407 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@spatula.net) Received: from turing.morons.org (morons.org [64.147.161.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3A143D58 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:54:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@spatula.net) Received: by turing.morons.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 11B4317048; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:54:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.morons.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF6C1701B; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:54:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:54:25 -0800 (PST) From: Nick Johnson X-X-Sender: spatula@turing To: Nikos Ntarmos In-Reply-To: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Message-ID: <20061110124459.M88944@turing> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:54:23 -0000 I suspect that even with only two threads, the threading implementation you use may make a difference. Check your /etc/libmap.conf and if it's easy to do, try again with the alternate thread implementations (libthr, libc_r) just for kicks. Refer to the man page for libmap.conf for an example. I'm not sure if the JVM uses shared memory segments, but you might want to sysctl -w kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 to keep shared memory from using swap. How are you setting your heap size? There could be performance differences between the memory allocators on different operating systems. What happens if you set -Xms and -Xmx to the same value (eg, 1024m) to get all of the allocation to happen up front? You might also play with /etc/malloc.conf if you find quirks of memory allocation. Are you using -client or -server? What about default GC tuning options? These can be platform-dependent. You may want to explicitly set these to compare apples to apples. I can't think of any other reason there'd be such a difference between OSes. Maybe someone else has some ideas. Nick On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > Hi all. > > I've spent the last week or so running the exact same Java code on the > exact same hardware, under different OSs. The code i'm running is > heavily cpu-bound (no i/o other than light logging), uses a lot of > memory (~1G), and does not rely on threading libraries (i.e. the program > creates two threads when it starts and that's all about it). > > I'm running a small and a large version of the program (wrt memory > requirements and run-time). The average execution time for the small > version goes from ~200'' under win32, to ~220'' under linux, and to > ~800'' under freebsd. For the large version, the numbers are ~1600'' > for win32, ~1800'' for linux, and ~4700'' for freebsd. > > This is all on a 1.7GHz Pentium-M laptop with 1G RAM (dmesg at > http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/Computers/dmesgs/ace.dmesg), running -current > as of Sep 29. The JDKs tested are diablo-jdk15 (1.5.0.07.01) and > sun-jdk15 (1.5.0p6) for FreeBSD, and sun-jdk15 (1.5.0_07) for linux and > win32. > > Does anybody else see such a performance drop across OSs? Is there some > specific (known) reason why freebsd lags behind the other two OSs by > this 3x-4x factor? Any pointers as to some (sysctl or other) knob I've > missed? > > Thanks in advance. > > \n\n > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- When you're a kid, they tell you it's all grow up, get a job, get married, get a house, have a kid, and that's it. No, the truth is the world is so much stranger than that. It's so much darker, and so much madder. And so much better. -- Elton, Doctor Who, "Love and Monsters" This message has been brought to you by Nick Johnson 2.1 and the number 6. http://healerNick.com/ http://morons.org/ http://spatula.net/ From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 21:34:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C0416A40F for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3122D43D4C for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:34:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (rhea.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.171]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F7B5C1B26 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:34:07 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEAA80001 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:34:05 +0200 (EET) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rhea [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01263-03 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:34:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [150.140.143.234]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4BF80003 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:34:03 +0200 (EET) Received: by ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D9FDC54; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:33:13 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:33:13 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061110124459.M88944@turing> Organization: NetCInS Lab., C.E.I.D., U. of Patras, Greece WWW-Homepage: http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9680 60A7 DE60 0298 B1F0 9B22 9BA2 7569 CF95 160A Office-Phone: +30-2610-996919 Office-Fax: +30-2610-969011 GPS-Info: 38.31N, 21.82E User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:34:10 -0000 Hi Nick. On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:54:25PM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote: > I suspect that even with only two threads, the threading > implementation you use may make a difference. Check your > /etc/libmap.conf and if it's easy to do, try again with the alternate > thread implementations (libthr, libc_r) just for kicks. Refer to the > man page for libmap.conf for an example. I'm using libthr, since libpthread has some stability problems for me. Moreover, I've seen people report libthr as the fastest of the tree implementations, so i thought i'd stick to that. Anyway, I also tested against libpthread without any noticeable difference. There's no libc_r on my system, so it's not an option. > I'm not sure if the JVM uses shared memory segments, but you might > want to sysctl -w kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 to keep shared memory from > using swap. Did that too. No noticeable difference, though... > How are you setting your heap size? There could be performance > differences between the memory allocators on different operating > systems. What happens if you set -Xms and -Xmx to the same value (eg, > 1024m) to get all of the allocation to happen up front? I was using -Xms256m -Xmx1024m. Tried with -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m, again without any noticeable difference. > You might also play with /etc/malloc.conf if you find quirks of memory > allocation. Malloc options are at their default (i.e. no /etc/malloc.conf). > Are you using -client or -server? -client (the default). Also tried with -server, without any noticeable difference. > What about default GC tuning options? These can be platform-dependent. > You may want to explicitly set these to compare apples to apples. My main consideration is not the fairness of the comparison but the difference in speed. I've tried all possible -X combinations but (guessed it?) without any noticeable difference; FreeBSD remains the lagger... > I can't think of any other reason there'd be such a difference between > OSes. Maybe someone else has some ideas. I was thinking something along the lines of "there are bits and pieces of jre/jdk implemented in native code and fbsd doesn't have'em yet", or (hopefully) "you have to sysctl-turn a.b.c on"... I'm really interested in hunting this down, since I'm going to spend a considerable part of the next few weeks running even larger versions of the program in question, and switching back and forth between freebsd (OS-of-choice for coding) and win32 (apparently the fastest of the three in executing the code) is a major pain (and loss of time). Thanks again. \n\n From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 21:47:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8501516A415 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:47:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milo@cyberlifelabs.com) Received: from smtp.cyberlifelabs.com (197-39.84.64.master-link.com [64.84.39.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2099B43D49 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:47:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from milo@cyberlifelabs.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([71.146.5.255]) (AUTH: LOGIN milo@cyberlifelabs.com) by mail.geo.cyberlifelabs.com with esmtp; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:47:32 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Message-Id: From: Milo Hyson Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:47:31 -0800 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:47:37 -0000 Low-level benchmarks of the systems (e.g. bytebench) might help shed some light on things. I once found the apm module was dragging down my context-switching performance by a huge margin. I'm not saying that's the issue here, but eliminating some sort of low-level issue would help to narrow down the possibilities. -- Milo Hyson CyberLife Labs On Nov 10, 2006, at 13:33, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > Hi Nick. > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:54:25PM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote: >> I suspect that even with only two threads, the threading >> implementation you use may make a difference. Check your >> /etc/libmap.conf and if it's easy to do, try again with the alternate >> thread implementations (libthr, libc_r) just for kicks. Refer to the >> man page for libmap.conf for an example. > > I'm using libthr, since libpthread has some stability problems for me. > Moreover, I've seen people report libthr as the fastest of the tree > implementations, so i thought i'd stick to that. Anyway, I also tested > against libpthread without any noticeable difference. There's no > libc_r > on my system, so it's not an option. > >> I'm not sure if the JVM uses shared memory segments, but you might >> want to sysctl -w kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 to keep shared memory from >> using swap. > > Did that too. No noticeable difference, though... > >> How are you setting your heap size? There could be performance >> differences between the memory allocators on different operating >> systems. What happens if you set -Xms and -Xmx to the same value (eg, >> 1024m) to get all of the allocation to happen up front? > > I was using -Xms256m -Xmx1024m. Tried with -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m, again > without any noticeable difference. > >> You might also play with /etc/malloc.conf if you find quirks of >> memory >> allocation. > > Malloc options are at their default (i.e. no /etc/malloc.conf). > >> Are you using -client or -server? > > -client (the default). Also tried with -server, without any noticeable > difference. > >> What about default GC tuning options? These can be platform- >> dependent. >> You may want to explicitly set these to compare apples to apples. > > My main consideration is not the fairness of the comparison but the > difference in speed. I've tried all possible -X combinations but > (guessed it?) without any noticeable difference; FreeBSD remains the > lagger... > >> I can't think of any other reason there'd be such a difference >> between >> OSes. Maybe someone else has some ideas. > > I was thinking something along the lines of "there are bits and pieces > of jre/jdk implemented in native code and fbsd doesn't have'em > yet", or > (hopefully) "you have to sysctl-turn a.b.c on"... > > I'm really interested in hunting this down, since I'm going to spend a > considerable part of the next few weeks running even larger > versions of > the program in question, and switching back and forth between freebsd > (OS-of-choice for coding) and win32 (apparently the fastest of the > three in executing the code) is a major pain (and loss of time). > > Thanks again. > > \n\n > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 21:52:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325E616A417 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arnej@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from decibel.pvv.ntnu.no (decibel.pvv.ntnu.no [129.241.210.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C764B43D5A for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arnej@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from arnej by decibel.pvv.ntnu.no with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GieIp-0005Iu-8N; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:52:47 +0100 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:52:47 +0100 (CET) From: "Arne H. Juul" To: Nikos Ntarmos In-Reply-To: <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Message-ID: References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:52:52 -0000 > I was using -Xms256m -Xmx1024m. Tried with -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m, again > without any noticeable difference. What's "top" look like after running this for a minute or two? You said you had 1G = 1024MB of RAM; trying to have a heap of 1024m you may be swapping like crazy, if so try with 600m to 800m. - Arne H. J. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 21:53:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7823316A47B for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3FF43D53 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:53:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAALrGJa029881 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:53:17 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk kAALrGJa029881 Message-ID: <4554F4C6.3090802@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:53:10 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> In-Reply-To: <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1A004A43291D54FA66B7B6B5" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:53:37 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2185/Fri Nov 10 11:04:49 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:53:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1A004A43291D54FA66B7B6B5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:54:25PM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote: =20 >> I can't think of any other reason there'd be such a difference between= >> OSes. Maybe someone else has some ideas. >=20 > I was thinking something along the lines of "there are bits and pieces > of jre/jdk implemented in native code and fbsd doesn't have'em yet", or= > (hopefully) "you have to sysctl-turn a.b.c on"... >=20 > I'm really interested in hunting this down, since I'm going to spend a > considerable part of the next few weeks running even larger versions of= > the program in question, and switching back and forth between freebsd > (OS-of-choice for coding) and win32 (apparently the fastest of the > three in executing the code) is a major pain (and loss of time). Is this the same issue with syscalls as affects MySQL? As in unconstrained calling of gettimeofday() or similar because such=20 "syscalls are free"? Which is pretty much true in Linux, at the cost of not returning the time particularly accurately. Look at http://wikitest.freebsd.org/MySQL -- especially the point about "frequent queries of the system time". Try tweaking the 'kern.timecounter.choice' sysctl and see if that makes much difference. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig1A004A43291D54FA66B7B6B5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFVPTM8Mjk52CukIwRCMSNAJ4hrlKUnMOH9R4Dt3Q8TwMV8BZtmwCeISME AtaVnTYiz+BphnESpI5DKJM= =jDB/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1A004A43291D54FA66B7B6B5-- From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 22:15:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C687616A417 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:15:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE0D43D5F for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:15:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (rhea.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.171]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990335C1B7D for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:15:55 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9651D80003 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:15:53 +0200 (EET) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rhea [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07939-10 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:15:51 +0200 (EET) Received: from ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [150.140.143.234]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAE980002 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:15:51 +0200 (EET) Received: by ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6BB4054; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:15:01 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:15:01 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061110221501.GC72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: NetCInS Lab., C.E.I.D., U. of Patras, Greece WWW-Homepage: http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9680 60A7 DE60 0298 B1F0 9B22 9BA2 7569 CF95 160A Office-Phone: +30-2610-996919 Office-Fax: +30-2610-969011 GPS-Info: 38.31N, 21.82E User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:15:57 -0000 Hi there. On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:52:47PM +0100, Arne H. Juul wrote: > >I was using -Xms256m -Xmx1024m. Tried with -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m, again > >without any noticeable difference. > > What's "top" look like after running this for a minute or two? You > said you had 1G = 1024MB of RAM; trying to have a heap of 1024m you > may be swapping like crazy, if so try with 600m to 800m. Nope, it's not swap that's killing it... The program i'm running is a p2p network simulation; first, it generates a number of nodes, then it populates the resulting overlay with data, then it queries it. During the node generation part, memory requirements are in the vicinity of 200-300 MBytes, then they go up as data items get added. However, the difference in performance shows up even in this first stage: ~1000'' for FreeBSD, ~210'' for win32, ~220 for linux. \n\n From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 22:25:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C564E16A5F6 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB37943D93 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:25:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.51) id 1GieoN-000G7W-03 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:25:23 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-9-206728749; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <2BAC3B24-35AF-4505-89D7-E1A4B0B24E93@shire.net> From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:25:22 -0700 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:25:29 -0000 --Apple-Mail-9-206728749 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:37 PM, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > > I'm running a small and a large version of the program (wrt memory > requirements and run-time). The average execution time for the small > version goes from ~200'' under win32, to ~220'' under linux, and to > ~800'' under freebsd. For the large version, the numbers are ~1600'' > for win32, ~1800'' for linux, and ~4700'' for freebsd. > > This is all on a 1.7GHz Pentium-M laptop with 1G RAM (dmesg at > http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/Computers/dmesgs/ace.dmesg), running - > current > as of Sep 29. The JDKs tested are diablo-jdk15 (1.5.0.07.01) and > sun-jdk15 (1.5.0p6) for FreeBSD, and sun-jdk15 (1.5.0_07) for linux > and > win32. My Java 1.4.2 in FreeBSD was only slightly slower than sun java 1.4.2 on linux and slightly more slower than on Solaris 10, but not at all by the margins you mention. Just a point of reference. The java I was running was some compute intensive "benchmarks" and some production web app (WebObjects) code. I have not yet built a 1.5 on FreeBSD. I am on a server only, no display, so I have been building my own and not using the diablo stuff at all. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net --Apple-Mail-9-206728749-- From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 22:34:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13E616A4E7 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB0743D5F for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:33:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (rhea.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.171]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6536D5C13E3 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:33:30 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C0E80002 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:33:28 +0200 (EET) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rhea [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10135-07 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:33:26 +0200 (EET) Received: from ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [150.140.143.234]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D4980001 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:33:26 +0200 (EET) Received: by ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 001E954; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:32:36 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:32:36 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061110223236.GD72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <4554F4C6.3090802@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4554F4C6.3090802@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: NetCInS Lab., C.E.I.D., U. of Patras, Greece WWW-Homepage: http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9680 60A7 DE60 0298 B1F0 9B22 9BA2 7569 CF95 160A Office-Phone: +30-2610-996919 Office-Fax: +30-2610-969011 GPS-Info: 38.31N, 21.82E User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:34:36 -0000 Hi Matthew. On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 09:53:10PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Is this the same issue with syscalls as affects MySQL? As in > unconstrained calling of gettimeofday() or similar because such > "syscalls are free"? Which is pretty much true in Linux, at the > cost of not returning the time particularly accurately. > > Look at http://wikitest.freebsd.org/MySQL -- especially the point > about "frequent queries of the system time". Try tweaking the > 'kern.timecounter.choice' sysctl and see if that makes much > difference. That was my first thought too. I've tried with ACPI-fast, TSC, and i8254 and saw no noticeable difference (btw k.t.hardware is the one to be set to whatever value and k.t.choice the one to be queried for available time counters)... \n\n From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 22:34:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BB616A542 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@spatula.net) Received: from turing.morons.org (morons.org [64.147.161.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A03D43D8F for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:33:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@spatula.net) Received: by turing.morons.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2D8C317035; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:33:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.morons.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BDC1702F; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:33:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:33:33 -0800 (PST) From: Nick Johnson X-X-Sender: spatula@turing To: Nikos Ntarmos In-Reply-To: <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Message-ID: <20061110142436.G88944@turing> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:34:38 -0000 On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: >> What about default GC tuning options? These can be platform-dependent. >> You may want to explicitly set these to compare apples to apples. > > My main consideration is not the fairness of the comparison but the > difference in speed. I've tried all possible -X combinations but > (guessed it?) without any noticeable difference; FreeBSD remains the > lagger... How can you compare differences in speed without comparing in the same set of circumstances? Otherwise, you're comparing apples to oranges and the comparison is not valid. > I was thinking something along the lines of "there are bits and pieces > of jre/jdk implemented in native code and fbsd doesn't have'em yet", or > (hopefully) "you have to sysctl-turn a.b.c on"... I can't imagine there is anything like that, since what gets compiled with the port (and what's included in the package) is a stock Sun JVM with patches applied to get it to compile and run correctly on FreeBSD. Did you compile the port or did you use the precompiled binary? It's also conceivable that the other platform JVMs are compiled with a more aggressive set of compiler optimizations, etc. You may notice a difference if the port is compiled with "CPUTYPE?=i686" in /etc/make.conf, for example. I can't really say for sure. Have you tried attaching to the JVM with VisualGC to watch what's going on in memory? Perhaps things are allocated differently by default on the different platforms. How was your kernel compiled? There are certainly tweaks to kernels that can make a major difference in performance. The default Generic kernel is pretty conservative. Options for AUTO_EOI_1, AUTO_EOI_2, HZ, maxusers and so-on can all make a significant difference. Other platforms may ship with a much more aggressive set of defaults. You have to control for these things or you're not doing a legitimate comparison. It's really difficult to guess without a great deal more contextual informaiton. Nick -- When you're a kid, they tell you it's all grow up, get a job, get married, get a house, have a kid, and that's it. No, the truth is the world is so much stranger than that. It's so much darker, and so much madder. And so much better. -- Elton, Doctor Who, "Love and Monsters" This message has been brought to you by Nick Johnson 2.1 and the number 6. http://healerNick.com/ http://morons.org/ http://spatula.net/ From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 22:50:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43AF16A521 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arnej@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from decibel.pvv.ntnu.no (decibel.pvv.ntnu.no [129.241.210.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0535B43D72 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:49:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arnej@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: from arnej by decibel.pvv.ntnu.no with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GifBl-0001UV-7B; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:49:33 +0100 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:49:33 +0100 (CET) From: "Arne H. Juul" To: Nikos Ntarmos In-Reply-To: <20061110221501.GC72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Message-ID: References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110221501.GC72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:50:24 -0000 On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: >>> I was using -Xms256m -Xmx1024m. Tried with -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m, again >>> without any noticeable difference. >> >> What's "top" look like after running this for a minute or two? You >> said you had 1G = 1024MB of RAM; trying to have a heap of 1024m you >> may be swapping like crazy, if so try with 600m to 800m. > > Nope, it's not swap that's killing it... The program i'm running is a > p2p network simulation; first, it generates a number of nodes, then it > populates the resulting overlay with data, then it queries it. During > the node generation part, memory requirements are in the vicinity of > 200-300 MBytes, then they go up as data items get added. However, the > difference in performance shows up even in this first stage: ~1000'' for > FreeBSD, ~210'' for win32, ~220 for linux. is it possible to post the program for others to test? (if there's no trade secrets or similar in it) I'd like to run it; I've been compiling my own version of the Java VM with various tweaks on FreeBSD 4 and this sounds like a better test than the programs I've been using so far. - Arne H. J. From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 00:38:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4927516A4B3; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) From: David Xu To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 08:38:09 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> In-Reply-To: <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611110838.09171.davidxu@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nikos Ntarmos Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:38:12 -0000 On Saturday 11 November 2006 05:33, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > > You might also play with /etc/malloc.conf if you find quirks of memory > > allocation. > > Malloc options are at their default (i.e. no /etc/malloc.conf). > I believe default malloc options on -CURRENT turn on debugging code. you might define NO_MALLOC_EXTRAS=yes in /etc/make.conf, recompile and reinstall libc, try it to see if there is any difference. Regards, David Xu From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 04:46:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3937B16A415 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AC943D49 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (rhea.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.171]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CC25C1B0F for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:43 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F275280007 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:40 +0200 (EET) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rhea [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03648-01 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:38 +0200 (EET) Received: from ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [150.140.143.234]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FEE80002 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:37 +0200 (EET) Received: by ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2FC2756; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:28:29 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:28:29 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061111042829.GB88440@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110142436.G88944@turing> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061110142436.G88944@turing> Organization: NetCInS Lab., C.E.I.D., U. of Patras, Greece WWW-Homepage: http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9680 60A7 DE60 0298 B1F0 9B22 9BA2 7569 CF95 160A Office-Phone: +30-2610-996919 Office-Fax: +30-2610-969011 GPS-Info: 38.31N, 21.82E User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:45 -0000 Hi again. On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:33:33PM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > > >>What about default GC tuning options? These can be platform-dependent. > >>You may want to explicitly set these to compare apples to apples. > > > >My main consideration is not the fairness of the comparison but the > >difference in speed. I've tried all possible -X combinations but > >(guessed it?) without any noticeable difference; FreeBSD remains the > >lagger... > > How can you compare differences in speed without comparing in the same set of > circumstances? Otherwise, you're comparing apples to oranges and the > comparison is not valid. Ummm... It looks more like "apples under freebsd" and "apples under linux or win32" to me... :) > >I was thinking something along the lines of "there are bits and pieces > >of jre/jdk implemented in native code and fbsd doesn't have'em yet", or > >(hopefully) "you have to sysctl-turn a.b.c on"... > > I can't imagine there is anything like that, since what gets compiled with the > port (and what's included in the package) is a stock Sun JVM with patches > applied to get it to compile and run correctly on FreeBSD. That's what my intuition told me as well. However, it seems that that's not the case after all... I was looking into visualgc, then jconsole, then into various arcane java knobs, and came to the conclusion that the only way I can make, say, linux to perform as bad as freebsd was by turning JIT off (as in 'java -Xint ...'). Then I stumbled upon this (very dated) document: http://www.freebsd.org/java/docs/performance.html. It compares JDK 1.1.8 on linux and freebsd and its findings are similar to mine. The bad thing is that I can't reproduce those figures since (i) the tests in that document were run in Dec '99, (ii) patrick@ is listed as a freebsd alumni until 2004, and (iii) Pendragon Software doesn't produce Caffeine Mark anymore. It appears like JIT isn't quite as good on BSDs as it is on linux or win32 or solaris. I scoured through the source code of the JDK and it's crawling with ifdef's where solaris and linux seem to be better instrumented than BSDs... > Did you compile the port or did you use the precompiled binary? Both. Diablo-jdk15 (as in java/diablo-jdk15) comes precompiled for freebsd-6 (needs libc.so.6 -> libc.so.7 mappings in libmap.conf), while sun-jdk15 (as in java/jdk15) comes in source code form only. > It's also conceivable that the other platform JVMs are compiled with a > more aggressive set of compiler optimizations, etc. You may notice a > difference if the port is compiled with "CPUTYPE?=i686" in > /etc/make.conf, for example. I can't really say for sure. The latter was compiled with CPUTYPE?=pentium-m and COPTFLAGS+=-O2. I'd like to also test compiling it with icc, but can't make my way through intel's web site... :( > Have you tried attaching to the JVM with VisualGC to watch what's > going on in memory? Perhaps things are allocated differently by > default on the different platforms. Yes. I tried both visualgc and the (seemingly newer) jconsole. There is no noticeable difference, other than the seer speed difference. > How was your kernel compiled? There are certainly tweaks to kernels > that can make a major difference in performance. The default Generic > kernel is pretty conservative. Options for AUTO_EOI_1, AUTO_EOI_2, > HZ, maxusers and so-on can all make a significant difference. You are right there. I don't use AUTO_EOI_* as this is a laptop and can't afford to lose the suspend/resume functionality (i'll try it out though and report after I get some sleep). HZ is set to 1000 and maxusers to 0 (i.e. auto-config), causing the system to set it to 384 That is: $ sysctl kern.maxusers kern.maxusers: 384 > Other platforms may ship with a much more aggressive set of defaults. > You have to control for these things or you're not doing a legitimate > comparison. I imagine that, only I'd like to find out what those defaults are and how they differ from freebsd, and thought that this is the right place to ask... :) Please note that I don't mean this e-mail (thread) as a "look, freebsd sucks" thing. After all, I've already said that freebsd _is_ my OS-of-choice for (at least) development chores. However, such a performance lag is a show-stopper for me (especially with various related deadlines approaching fast). I'm willing to take some days off the actual coding process to hunt this performance issue down. What I wanted to know is if someone here _knows for sure_ that, say, HotSpot sucks under FreeBSD compared to linux and win32. \n\n From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 04:46:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448D016A416 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FFE43D4C for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (rhea.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.171]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050AF5C1B1F for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:44 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CF780002 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rhea [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03648-02 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [150.140.143.234]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A1B80003 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:37 +0200 (EET) Received: by ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A45165E; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:29:46 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:29:46 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061111042946.GC88440@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <200611110838.09171.davidxu@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611110838.09171.davidxu@freebsd.org> Organization: NetCInS Lab., C.E.I.D., U. of Patras, Greece WWW-Homepage: http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9680 60A7 DE60 0298 B1F0 9B22 9BA2 7569 CF95 160A Office-Phone: +30-2610-996919 Office-Fax: +30-2610-969011 GPS-Info: 38.31N, 21.82E User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:45 -0000 Hi there David. On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 08:38:09AM +0800, David Xu wrote: > I believe default malloc options on -CURRENT turn on debugging code. > you might define NO_MALLOC_EXTRAS=yes in /etc/make.conf, > recompile and reinstall libc, try it to see if there is any difference. Thanks for the pointer. I just rebuilt world with NO_MALLOC_EXTRAS=yes. No noticeable difference though :( \n\n From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 04:46:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BF116A407 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757A343D45 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (rhea.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.171]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2485C1B3E for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:45 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0C880002 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:43 +0200 (EET) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rhea [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03648-03 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:42 +0200 (EET) Received: from ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [150.140.143.234]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0098780004 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:37 +0200 (EET) Received: by ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0E80860; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:37:55 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:37:55 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061111043755.GD88440@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <2BAC3B24-35AF-4505-89D7-E1A4B0B24E93@shire.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2BAC3B24-35AF-4505-89D7-E1A4B0B24E93@shire.net> Organization: NetCInS Lab., C.E.I.D., U. of Patras, Greece WWW-Homepage: http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9680 60A7 DE60 0298 B1F0 9B22 9BA2 7569 CF95 160A Office-Phone: +30-2610-996919 Office-Fax: +30-2610-969011 GPS-Info: 38.31N, 21.82E User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:46 -0000 Hi there. On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:25:22PM -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > My Java 1.4.2 in FreeBSD was only slightly slower than sun java 1.4.2 > on linux and slightly more slower than on Solaris 10, but not at all > by the margins you mention. Just a point of reference. That's interesting. Well, my code has several 1.5-isms but I'll see if I can convert it back to a 1.4-compatible form to test it against java/jdk14 (which i'm building as we speak...). \n\n From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 04:46:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6BD16A403 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D4243D45 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (rhea.ceid.upatras.gr [150.140.141.171]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9F25C1B0F for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:46 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD18080002 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:44 +0200 (EET) Received: from rhea.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rhea [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03567-06 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:37 +0200 (EET) Received: from ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [150.140.143.234]) by rhea.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E72680001 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:46:37 +0200 (EET) Received: by ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D516654; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 05:57:58 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 05:57:58 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061111035758.GA88440@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110221501.GC72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: NetCInS Lab., C.E.I.D., U. of Patras, Greece WWW-Homepage: http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9680 60A7 DE60 0298 B1F0 9B22 9BA2 7569 CF95 160A Office-Phone: +30-2610-996919 Office-Fax: +30-2610-969011 GPS-Info: 38.31N, 21.82E User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:47 -0000 Hi again. On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:49:33PM +0100, Arne H. Juul wrote: > is it possible to post the program for others to test? (if there's no > trade secrets or similar in it) I'd like to run it; I've been > compiling my own version of the Java VM with various tweaks on FreeBSD > 4 and this sounds like a better test than the programs I've been using > so far. Of course. No trade secret there... :) Grab [1]. It's an implementation of [2] over [3]. Example command line arguments: java -classpath :classes \ netcins.p2p.dhs.testing.DHSSingleMetricTest \ 1000 100000 64 32 10 where 1000 is the number of nodes in the simulated system, 100000 the number of items to be added, and the other numbers are parameters of the simulated application. It should take a while to do the whole hog, but don't wait for it to finish. After all nodes are online, it prints out the time it took it to generate them all. If it takes more than 200-220'' (win32 and linux times respectively), we're done. On my 1.7GHz Pentium-M it's more like 800''... BTW the given application has two modes of simulated execution: plain event-driven simulation and simulation with network i/o over virtual nodes... Well, the latter easily crashes my freebsd box any time i run it for more than 2000 nodes, no matter how heavily i tweak my kernel conf, boot.conf, sysctl.conf, et al. \n\n [1] http://ntarmos.dyndns.org/Misc/DHS-FreePastry-2.0b2.tgz [2] N. Ntarmos, P. Triantafillou, and G. Weikum. "Counting at large: Efficient cardinality estimation in Internet-scale data networks." In Proc. ICDE '06. [3] http://freepastry.org/ From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 19:50:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589F116A47E for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-java@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320DA43D4C for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-java@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Giyra-0000ii-Ql for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:50:02 +0100 Received: from 89-172-60-88.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.60.88]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:50:02 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-60-88.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:50:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:49:03 +0100 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110124459.M88944@turing> <20061110213313.GA72658@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061110142436.G88944@turing> <20061111042829.GB88440@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-60-88.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) In-Reply-To: <20061111042829.GB88440@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> Sender: news Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:50:08 -0000 Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > freebsd-6 (needs libc.so.6 -> libc.so.7 mappings in libmap.conf), while Running 7-CURRENT? Maybe you've done this but just in case: have you turned off debugging in the kernel? WITNESS, INVARIANTS and malloc debugging? From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 11 23:47:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B6C16A494 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@dreamtime.ca) Received: from dreamtime.ca (216-130-65-164.static.mts.net [216.130.65.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C910A43D6E for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:47:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@dreamtime.ca) Received: by dreamtime.ca (Postfix, from userid 0) id D517741AAFD; Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:53:12 -0600 (CST) To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1163289192.37937.qmail@eBay.com> From: "abuse@eBay.com" Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:53:12 -0600 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Your account has been suspended X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:47:46 -0000 [spacer.gif] eBay Warning -- respond now [1][eBayLogo.gif] Dear member, Your account has been suspended. If you want to unsuspend your user please check the link below: [2]Unsuspend you eBay account:. Regards, eBay References 1. http://www.ebay.com/ 2. http://www.zachkoenig.com/doc/unsuspend.ebay.com/index.html