From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 17 19:51:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC2F16A417 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wiqd@codelounge.org) Received: from mx1.codelounge.co.za (mx1.codelounge.co.za [196.14.172.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8535C43D55 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:51:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wiqd@codelounge.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.codelounge.co.za [196.14.172.107]) by mx1.codelounge.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8D876FB96 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:55:31 +0200 (SAST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) (FreeBSD) at localhost Received: from mx1.codelounge.co.za ([196.14.172.107]) by localhost (mx1.codelounge.co.za [196.14.172.107]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LcZssFCgWF+U for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:55:24 +0200 (SAST) Received: from codelounge.org (c1-98-3.nngy.isadsl.co.za [196.209.18.98]) by mx1.codelounge.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E74A76FB94 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:55:21 +0200 (SAST) Received: by codelounge.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 wiqd@codelounge.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:51:17 +0200 (SAST) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:51:13 +0200 From: Greg Armer To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060917195113.GA17319@gentoo> References: <39DC135F7F0571489196E0B6F5D58B4A01B26FDF@MWBEXCH.mweb.com> <39DC135F7F0571489196E0B6F5D58B4A01B26FE2@MWBEXCH.mweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <39DC135F7F0571489196E0B6F5D58B4A01B26FE2@MWBEXCH.mweb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: Block Skype with PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Greg Armer List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:51:30 -0000 On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Rudi Kramer wrote: >Hey Greg, > >I found this article which should help a bit. > >http://www.net- >security.org/dl/articles/Blocking_Skype.pdf#search=%22net%20squid%20skyp >e%20blocking%22 Many thanks, this worked perfectly. > > >Rudi > Regards, -- Greg Armer From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 18 04:11:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B4716A403 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unixtools@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s19.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s19.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936A143D46 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:11:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from unixtools@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.161.93]) by bay0-omc3-s19.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:11:00 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:11:00 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 203.199.109.161 by BAY106-DAV21.phx.gbl with DAV; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:10:58 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [203.199.109.161] X-Originating-Email: [unixtools@hotmail.com] X-Sender: unixtools@hotmail.com From: To: "Mircea Popescu" , References: Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:51:51 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Sep 2006 04:11:00.0236 (UTC) FILETIME=[72E9E4C0:01C6DAD8] Cc: Subject: Re: TRansparent firewalll (pf vs ipfw) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:11:01 -0000 Hi, Ipfw Bridging works well for our large network. You need a good network interface though.If you are trying load balancing pf is the best bet. For bridging, I suppose ipfw is better. -Sunil Sunder Raj ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mircea Popescu" To: Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 8:26 PM Subject: TRansparent firewalll (pf vs ipfw) > Hi! > > I have an Freebsd 6.0 box with a functioning bridge (bridge0 = fxp0 + rl0) > > My problem is that if I try to cut access to any port on bridge0 > interface using PF, nothing happens. > > For example I've tried to cut access to ssh service from a certain ip > ... putty still managed to get through. > > The rule was: > block on bridge0 proto { tcp udp } from yy.yy.yy.yy to xx.xx.xx.xx port pppppp > > BUT, with the following rule: > block on rl0 proto { tcp udp } from yy.yy.yy.yy to xx.xx.xx.xx. port pppppp > > Putty couldn't obtain a connection. > > Considering the fact that in linux, which I gave up using, making a > bridge would disable the interfaces within, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOME > QUESTIONS ANSWERED: > > 1. Once the bridge0 interface is created, the fxp0 and rl0 interfaces > could still get their own ip addresses? (in linux this would be > imposible) > > 2. Which firewall it is more desirable to use with a bridge? PF or IPFW) > > > Thx a lot > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 18 11:08:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9263616A412 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DE943D4C for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8IB8KpO041053 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:08:21 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8IB8JMp041049 for freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:08:19 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:08:19 GMT Message-Id: <200609181108.k8IB8JMp041049@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: linimon set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:08:21 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/82271 pf [pf] cbq scheduler cause bad latency f kern/86072 pf [pf] Packet Filter rule not working properly (with SYN o kern/92949 pf [pf] PF + ALTQ problems with latency o sparc/93530 pf Incorrect checksums when using pf's route-to on sparc6 4 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o conf/81042 pf [pf] [patch] /etc/pf.os doesn't match FreeBSD 5.3->5.4 o kern/93825 pf [pf] pf reply-to doesn't work o kern/94992 pf [pf] [patch] pfctl complains about ALTQ missing 3 problems total. From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 20 08:48:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEA216A412 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ask@develooper.com) Received: from x8.develooper.com (x8.develooper.com [216.52.237.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433F743D4C for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:48:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ask@develooper.com) Received: (qmail 3091 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2006 08:48:34 -0000 Received: from gw.develooper.com (HELO ?10.0.201.101?) (ask@cleverpeople.org@64.81.84.140) by smtp.develooper.com with (RC4-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 20 Sep 2006 08:48:34 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <596996E2-D643-4D66-ADE3-36099FF2BDD6@develooper.com> References: <596996E2-D643-4D66-ADE3-36099FF2BDD6@develooper.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:48:23 -0700 To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: bad ruleset - pf not keeping state for some bridged connections? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:48:35 -0000 On Sep 6, 2006, at 20:17, Ask Bj=F8rn Hansen wrote: > I am having a bit of trouble with my pf ruleset that I can't figure =20= > out. > > My ISP gives me a few static IPs, so I have a Soekris box running =20 > as a bridging firewall running 6.0-RELEASE-p4. > > It does NAT for my RFC1918 net and does the bridging firewall for =20 > my public IPs. > > I've posted my pf.conf here: > http://tmp.askask.com/2006/09/pf.conf > > The bridge is setup with > net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge=3D0 > net.link.bridge.pfil_member=3D1 > > Some months ago I must have changed something that makes incoming =20 > ssh connections not (always) work. [... http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2006-September/=20 002616.html ..] Actually, I noticed something else: It's only when the box behind the FreeBSD box is running Fedora 5 =20 this happens. A few packets are sent back and forth and then it's =20 like the session is dropped. With OS X or RHEL the sessions get going just fine. Any ideas for what to look for to debug this? - ask --=20 http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 20 09:06:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A0C16A494 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ask@develooper.com) Received: from x8.develooper.com (x8.develooper.com [216.52.237.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3AD43DFF for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:06:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ask@develooper.com) Received: (qmail 3231 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2006 09:06:14 -0000 Received: from gw.develooper.com (HELO ?10.0.201.101?) (ask@cleverpeople.org@64.81.84.140) by smtp.develooper.com with (RC4-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 20 Sep 2006 09:06:14 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <596996E2-D643-4D66-ADE3-36099FF2BDD6@develooper.com> References: <596996E2-D643-4D66-ADE3-36099FF2BDD6@develooper.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6A101730-00DA-4E6A-A6A3-006B8C89ED54@develooper.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 02:06:04 -0700 To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: bad ruleset - pf not keeping state for some bridged connections? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:06:59 -0000 On Sep 6, 2006, at 20:17, Ask Bj=F8rn Hansen wrote: Sorry about replying to my own mail, I figured I should include a bit =20= more debug information. This is from the Fedora box (64.81.32.148) (behind the freebsd/pf =20 bridge/firewall). It looks like the Fedora box is closing the =20 connection after a couple of packets? (The "F" flag is "FIN", right?) 08:48:23.879289 IP 67.15.155.11.32864 > 64.81.32.148.3309: S =20 3300493391:3300493391(0) win 5840 08:48:23.879535 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32864: S =20 516984971:516984971(0) ack 3300493392 win 5792 08:48:23.918926 IP 67.15.155.11.32864 > 64.81.32.148.3309: . ack 1 =20 win 1460 08:48:23.925702 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32864: P 1:71(70) =20= ack 1 win 46 08:48:23.965967 IP 67.15.155.11.32864 > 64.81.32.148.3309: . ack 71 =20 win 1460 08:48:28.931214 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32864: F 71:71(0) =20= ack 1 win 46 08:48:29.175137 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32864: F 71:71(0) =20= ack 1 win 46 08:48:29.214854 IP 67.15.155.11.32864 > 64.81.32.148.3309: . ack 72 =20 win 1460 08:48:31.441388 IP 67.15.155.11.32864 > 64.81.32.148.3309: FP 1:66=20 (65) ack 72 win 1460 08:48:31.441625 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32864: R =20 516985043:516985043(0) win 0 On the internal interface on the FreeBSD box I get line for line =20 *exactly* the same, except for the timestamps (no surprise). On the external interface (the one facing the internet and the =20 connecting box) it was (not the same connection attempt, so the =20 timestamp is a few minutes off): 08:52:17.642804 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: S =20 3564356178:3564356178(0) win 5840 08:52:17.644035 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32877: S =20 764788140:764788140(0) ack 3564356179 win 5792 08:52:17.682937 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: . ack 1 =20 win 1460 08:52:17.684160 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32877: P 1:71(70) =20= ack 1 win 46 08:52:17.724350 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: . ack 71 =20 win 1460 08:52:17.729743 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: P 1:66(65) =20= ack 71 win 1460 08:52:17.968325 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: P 1:66(65) =20= ack 71 win 1460 08:52:18.448706 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: P 1:66(65) =20= ack 71 win 1460 08:52:19.408590 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: P 1:66(65) =20= ack 71 win 1460 08:52:21.328413 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: P 1:66(65) =20= ack 71 win 1460 08:52:22.690688 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32877: F 71:71(0) =20= ack 1 win 46 08:52:22.729772 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: F 66:66(0) =20= ack 72 win 1460 08:52:22.937111 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32877: F 71:71(0) =20= ack 1 win 46 08:52:22.975678 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: . ack 72 =20 win 1460 08:52:25.167728 IP 67.15.155.11.32877 > 64.81.32.148.3309: FP 1:66=20 (65) ack 72 win 1460 08:52:25.168725 IP 64.81.32.148.3309 > 67.15.155.11.32877: R =20 764788212:764788212(0) win 0 Does this help anyone enough to be able to give me some hints? - ask --=20 http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/ From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 20 13:00:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E9F16A4A7 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rifat.ozkesenrjeu@egekim.com) Received: from cbm69.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (cbm69.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.30.110.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CE7643DCB for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rifat.ozkesenrjeu@egekim.com) Received: from mail.egekim.com (mail.egekim.com [195.244.37.4]) by cbm69.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id qKUOMXz4qHsS for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:10:02 -0400 Received: from linx (49.202.69.106) by mail.egekim.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NPmArLIKFYZw for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:10:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:10:02 -0400 From: Della Drake Message-ID: <293906575189.547498741800@egekim.com> To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: WB B O O E Brunette Gagging On Dick For Messy Bukkake X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Della Drake List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:00:12 -0000 Cumdrinking German Bukkake Pretty Sperm BitchesBukkake Blowjob http://here.gopeduned.com/?typeseen Oh! The good times when we were so unhappy.Idealism is the despot of thought, just as politics is the despot of will. Man is an over-complicated organism. If he is doomed to extinction he will die out for want of simplicity. From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 21 11:44:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EED16A642; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0125B43D7D; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:44:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8LBiqEi062612; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:44:52 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8LBiqbL062608; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:44:52 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:44:52 GMT From: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <200609211144.k8LBiqbL062608@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/103304: pf accepts nonexistent queue in rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:44:53 -0000 Synopsis: pf accepts nonexistent queue in rules Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-pf Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Sep 21 11:44:33 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=103304 From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 21 18:47:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466D216A403 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rossjjco@keras.site5.com) Received: from keras.site5.com (keras.site5.com [216.118.97.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C94243D92 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:46:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rossjjco@keras.site5.com) Received: from rossjjco by keras.site5.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1GQTZF-0007De-TX for freebsd-pf@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:46:37 -0400 To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org From: customer-office@msgcu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Message-Id: Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:46:37 -0400 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - keras.site5.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32024 32008] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - keras.site5.com X-Source: /usr/bin/php X-Source-Args: /usr/bin/php sendlist2.php X-Source-Dir: rossjj.com:/public_html/adultsarcade/swf/upload/send/xender MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Michigan Schools & Government Credit Union - Reward X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: customer-office@msgcu.org, customer-care@msgcu.org List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:47:03 -0000 Dear Valued Customer, CONGRATULATIONS !!! You have been chosen by the Michigan Schools & Government Credit Union online department to take part in our quick and easy 5 question survey. In return we will credit $100 to your account - Just for your time! Helping us better understand how our customers feel benefits everyone. With the information collected we can decide to direct a number of changes to improve and expand our online service. The information you provide us is all non-sensitive and anonymous - No part of it is handed down to any third party groups. It will be stored in our secure database for maximum of 3 days while we process the results of this nationwide survey. We kindly ask you to spare two minutes of your time in taking part with this unique offer! To Continue click on the link below: [1]www.msgcu.org/survey/questions.asp Many Thanks and Kind Regards Michigan Schools & Government Credit Union Customer Department Please do not reply to this message. For any inquiries, contact Customer Service. Document Reference: (87051203). Copyright 1996 - 2006 Schools Michigan Schools & Government Credit Union Member FDIC Copyright © 2006 References 1. http://www.acmilan-bg.com/forum/cache/skin_cache/cacheid_18/msg/redirect.msgcu.org/member/secure/auth/on/ssl/data/base/mysql/complete/complete/index.html