From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 00:05:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0899816A406 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715E843D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.109]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYV004JRC9UY6C0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 May 2006 18:05:55 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml3so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.147]) by pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYV008U4C9UO2L0@pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 May 2006 18:05:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hexahedron.daemonology.net ([24.82.18.31]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with SMTP id <0IYV00IAJC9QXQK1@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 May 2006 18:05:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: (qmail 2394 invoked from network); Sat, 06 May 2006 03:55:37 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; Sat, 06 May 2006 03:55:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 20:55:37 -0700 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <1789c2360605042306s11d6790ctd910cdf9cf468f86@mail.gmail.com> To: Peggy Wilkins Message-id: <445C1E39.5090703@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 References: <1789c2360605041440p462ada3clb8c35d17d0d3e43d@mail.gmail.com> <20060504233208.GB811@sentinelchicken.net> <1789c2360605042036i12d1f562q935350362288087f@mail.gmail.com> <445ACD04.5030505@freebsd.org> <1789c2360605042306s11d6790ctd910cdf9cf468f86@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060416) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why do I have to keep doing "portsnap extract"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 00:05:56 -0000 Peggy Wilkins wrote: > On 5/4/06, Colin Percival wrote: >> Do you have a ".portsnap.INDEX" file in your ports tree? > > Yes; I don't know if it was there before I ran portsnap today, though. > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1230186 May 4 16:39 .portsnap.INDEX Does 'portsnap update' work now? Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 00:06:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E7116A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: from mail.cruzinternet.com (mail.cruzinternet.com [216.234.167.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BEF43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: (qmail 49298 invoked from network); 7 May 2006 00:06:09 -0000 Received: from iphost-216-234-182-9.cruzinternet.com (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (216.234.182.9) by mail.cruzinternet.com with SMTP; 7 May 2006 00:06:09 -0000 Message-ID: <445D39F2.3020101@cruzinternet.com> Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 18:06:10 -0600 From: Jeff Molofee User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060506) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060506120043.A71F016A464@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060506120043.A71F016A464@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Fetch Problems... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 00:06:11 -0000 I'm having some odd problems with fetch. If I pkg_add or attempt portupgrade, portmanage, etc, I get endless errors about fetch operation timed out. I am able to ping the sites by ip and name, I am able to ftp to the site, open the sites in firefox, galeon, etc. If I ssh into my own box and attempt pkg_add -r or portupgrade everything works fine. Does anyone know why this would be happening... it has me completely baffled. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 00:06:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5188416A430 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd3mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EADA43D69 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:06:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr5so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.50]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYV00FJ8C9UU200@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 May 2006 18:05:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml3so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.147]) by pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYV00JMTC9URIG0@pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 May 2006 18:05:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hexahedron.daemonology.net ([24.82.18.31]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with SMTP id <0IYV005A7C9QXU10@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 May 2006 18:05:54 -0600 (MDT) Received: (qmail 5931 invoked from network); Sat, 06 May 2006 21:37:45 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; Sat, 06 May 2006 21:37:45 +0000 Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 14:37:45 -0700 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: To: Arno Schleich Message-id: <445D1729.8050002@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 References: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060416) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 00:06:46 -0000 Arno Schleich wrote: > portugrade -a > > results in a repetitive rebuild of the package database whenever the > database is accessed. > > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... Inappropriate > file type or format - /var/db/pkg/pkgdb; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the > pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 435 packages found (-0 > +435) You probably recently upgraded from FreeBSD 5.x to FreeBSD 6.x: http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2006-04-14-portupgrade-errors.html Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 00:16:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C277B16A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: from smtp.ade.people.net.au (smtp.ade.people.net.au [218.214.228.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4D4443D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:16:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 24658 invoked from network); 7 May 2006 00:16:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO daemon.foo.lan) (218.214.176.70) by smtp.ade.people.net.au with SMTP; 7 May 2006 00:16:29 -0000 From: Ian Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 09:46:19 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <44517C75.2080300@fusemail.com> <20060428043305.432B.GERARD@seibercom.net> <4456899A.8080201@fusemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4456899A.8080201@fusemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1658414.USL34YQjQc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605070946.26938.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Cc: Brian John Subject: Re: video players broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 00:16:32 -0000 --nextPart1658414.USL34YQjQc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 02 May 2006 07:50, Brian John wrote: > Gerard Seibert wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0500, Brian John wrote: > >>> Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:59:42PM -0500, Brian John wrote: > >>>>> Hi, I just upgraded my ports and now all of my video players either > >>>>> won't install, or they won't start up. I've tried 4 different ones, > >>>>> here is what happens with each: > >>>>> > >>>>> vlc: won't install > >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libmatroska.so: undefined reference to > >>>>> `libebml::CodedSizeLength(unsigned long long, unsigned int)' > >>>>> gmake[2]: *** [vlc] Error 1 > >>>>> gmake[2]: Leaving directory > >>>>> `/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/vlc-0.8.4a' gmake[1]: *** > >>>>> [all-recursive] Error 1 > >>>>> gmake[1]: Leaving directory > >>>>> `/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/vlc-0.8.4a' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > >>>>> *** Error code 2 > >>>>> > >>>>> totem: won't start up > >>>>> [brian@brianjohn /usr/ports/multimedia/totem]$ totem & > >>>>> [1] 8150 > >>>>> [brian@brianjohn /usr/ports/multimedia/totem]$ /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: > >>>>> Shared object "libglib-2.0.so.600" not found, required by > >>>>> "libgnome-keyring.so.0" > >>>>> > >>>>> xine: this one starts up, but then closes right away, with no error > >>>>> > >>>>> mplayer: won't install, get several errors similar to this > >>>>> /usr/X11R6/lib/libxmms.so: undefined reference to > >>>>> `gtk_widget_get_type' /usr/X11R6/lib/libxmms.so: undefined reference > >>>>> to `gtk_vbox_new' gmake: *** [mencoder] Error 1 > >>>>> *** Error code 2 > >>>>> > >>>>> Can someone please help me out? > >>>> > >>>> You didn't upgrade your ports completely; you have an inconsistent m= ix > >>>> of old and new libraries on your system. portupgrade -a, or if that > >>>> fails, portupgrade -fa. > >>>> > >>>> Kris > >>> > >>> I was using portmanager to upgrade. I've always used this before and > >>> it's worked fine. I just type portmanager -u. Does that not work > >>> anymore? > >> > >> No idea, I don't use portmanager. > >> > >> Kris > > > > Assuming you have an updated ports collection, it should work fine It > > does on my system. > > > > I would recommend that you update your ports again and then run > > 'portmanager -u -f -y -l' and see if that fixes the problem. At the very > > least, a log file will be created '/var/log/portmanager.log' that might > > help track down the problem. > > > > HTH > > Hi, thanks for the advice. I tried that command and it's been updating > for a couple of days (takes so long because of the prompts that come up > that stop the installs). Anyway, now portmanager always gets to a > certain point and my computer reboots. I looked in the logfile and > there isn't much there, this is at the end of the file: > Sun Apr 30 16:36:17 2006 > kdelibs-3.4.2_1 /x11/kdelibs3 > OLD > kdelibs-3.5.2_1 /x11/kdelibs3 > > Any idea what could be causing this? > > Thanks again for the help > > /Brian I'm no expert, but I wonder if doing what it says in /usr/ports/UPDATING en= try=20 20060108 might help: AFFECTS: users of x11/kdelibs3, x11/kdebase3, deskutils/superkaramba, x11-themes/kde-windeco-smoothblend, irc/kvirc, editors/vimpart AUTHOR: kde@FreeBSD.org A number of files have been moved from kdebase to kdelibs between KDE 3.4.3 and KDE 3.5.0 and some applications which used to be distributed separately from KDE have been included in the release. This means that you will have to take some precautions in order to update your KDE installation without interruptions. We recommend sticking to the following procedure. This procedure requires you to have sysutils/portupgrade installed and to be the superuser (or using sudo) =2E 1.) Delete installed packages which conflict with the updated KDE ports. pkg_deinstall -f kdebase-\[0-9\]\* superkaramba-\[0-9\]\* \ kde-windeco-smoothblend-\[0-9]\* kvirc-\[0-9\]\* \ kdeaddons-vimpart-\[0-9\]\* 2.) Now update the remaining KDE ports. portupgrade -O arts\* kde\* \*kde-i18n\* or, if you want to update KDE along with other updated ports: portupgrade -a 3.) Reinstall the KDE ports you deleted in step 1. portinstall -O kdebase Superkaramba is now included in misc/kdeutils3. The smoothblend window decoration is now included in x11-themes/kdeartwor= k3. Vimpart is being discontinued and no longer part of KDE. =20 KNOWN ISSUES: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Just like KDE 3.4, KDE 3.5 does not play nice with openssl-0.9.8. In particular it breaks kwallet, some of the SSL handling in konqueror and SSL/TLS support in kmail/kontact. If you're using the openssl ports rather than the base-system openssl, make sure to use security/openssl-stable. You can put WITH_OPENSSL_STABLE=3Dyes into /etc/make.conf to automatically make ports depend on that rather than on security/openssl. FreeBSD 4.x users MUST install openssl-stable even if the base openssl is present for SSL/TLS support in kmail/kontact to work. Unfortunately, the kdepim3 port cannot depend on it automatically due to shortcomings/bugs in ports-collection's openssl infrastructure. Cheers, =2D-=20 Ian gpg key: http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~imoore/no-spam.asc --nextPart1658414.USL34YQjQc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXTxaPUlnmbKkJ6ARAlBVAJwOYx/MPP7WBezraBZFwV2k+1+XPACgnIKG kxh5N/RtXoBvTUEXaziDvEg= =R0g2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1658414.USL34YQjQc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 00:34:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6C716A403 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: from smtp.ade.people.net.au (smtp.ade.people.net.au [218.214.228.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E699F43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:34:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 24729 invoked from network); 7 May 2006 00:34:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO daemon.foo.lan) (218.214.176.70) by smtp.ade.people.net.au with SMTP; 7 May 2006 00:34:18 -0000 From: Ian Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 10:04:10 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6910365.xrVVuVZAFY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605071004.16725.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 00:34:19 -0000 --nextPart6910365.xrVVuVZAFY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 07 May 2006 09:10, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > I've been using pine *forever* now and am finding it really hard to find a > good GUI to replace it :( Tried kmail, didn't like it ... > > Off the top of my head, the only thing(s) it needs to do is: > > multiple identities > IMAP > PGP > > As much as I hate admitting doing things under Windows, I have used Eudora > in the past and like its interface, but, alas, there is no Eudora for Unix > I use kmail (part of kde) which is also very nice and will do all the above. Cheers, =2D-=20 Ian gpg key: http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~imoore/no-spam.asc --nextPart6910365.xrVVuVZAFY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXUCIPUlnmbKkJ6ARAkvPAJ9lAukDkpCMAR/1dy1QPVxIk6qD4QCeJbyo mAChbNLTBDexE0SwrT4I0tk= =qLvO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6910365.xrVVuVZAFY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 01:00:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF5816A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0845443D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:00:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FcXcw-0000pf-7t for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 03:00:06 +0200 Received: from sausages.cache.ed.ac.uk ([129.215.16.39]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 03:00:02 +0200 Received: from matt by sausages.cache.ed.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 03:00:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Matt Bostock Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 00:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 11 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 129.215.16.39 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060324 Ubuntu/dapper Firefox/1.5.0.1) Sender: news Subject: ZFS/NILFS for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 01:00:08 -0000 Hi, I'm looking for a stable filesystem that implements integrity checks using file checksums (aren't we all?). Is anyone aware of a ZFS/NILFS equivalent for FreeBSD? I know DragonFlyBSD plan to port ZFS, and NILFS is Linux only. Is there another option currently available for FreeBSD? Many thanks, Matt :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 01:09:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2E516A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:09:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60013.mail.yahoo.com (web60013.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E929543D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:09:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 55441 invoked by uid 60001); 7 May 2006 01:09:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=C7npRMr2qSSuzwyM+9Sa2K13J6GkTkuVVWYOK22kJGTX4Dt2Yn3usEDhQ+N/FLBav/BGWgSoQb5NaCJHJRyes7xuYOpfWXv/KZyGRWDoJDAy8S+RpXDFgnwIsWFGW1rPtOHoQGHnp30nzyViwbpGGii3raLNDgIl69q+RcbyBOY= ; Message-ID: <20060507010939.55439.qmail@web60013.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.81.189.3] by web60013.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 06 May 2006 21:09:39 EDT Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:09:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter To: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 01:09:40 -0000 --- "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > I've been using pine *forever* now and am finding it really hard to > find a > good GUI to replace it :( Tried kmail, didn't like it ... > > Off the top of my head, the only thing(s) it needs to do is: > > multiple identities > IMAP > PGP > > As much as I hate admitting doing things under Windows, I have used > Eudora > in the past and like its interface, but, alas, there is no Eudora for > Unix I'm testing out sylpheed-claws[1]. It seems a little brittle at times (preferences being lost, odd crashes) but I'm going to hang with it for awhile. It loads quickly and is good for usenet too. Lots of configuration possible (it even has options not visible via the GUI). [1] http://claws.sylpheed.org/features.php __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 01:27:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A6116A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:27:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE0043D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:26:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from piglet.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-108-49.storm.ca [216.106.108.49]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k471Qwnm010766 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 21:26:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by piglet.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C45FB73BE8; Sat, 6 May 2006 21:30:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:30:27 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060507013027.GB7351@piglet.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: installing multiple kernels X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 01:27:00 -0000 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable People, Coming from Linux, I'm used to being able to build multiple kernels and install them all, configuring the bootloader to pick one of them at boot ti= me. I can't find anything on doing this on FreeBSD. Is this possible? Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEXU2yKGqCc1vIvggRAnNVAJ4hoyZqZGY1hdQgQbTUIFSbS0qs6gCdHc9i 6mr6IgSBPQScfUciNvaLhLY= =jBX4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 01:28:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1DD16A409 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericdan@ucla.edu) Received: from smtp-1.smtp.ucla.edu (smtp-1.smtp.ucla.edu [169.232.46.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FB043D55 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:28:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ericdan@ucla.edu) Received: from mail.ucla.edu (mail.ucla.edu [169.232.46.157]) by smtp-1.smtp.ucla.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k471S8mj006440 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 18:28:08 -0700 Received: from localhost (pool-71-106-208-236.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.106.208.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ucla.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k471S6o5006320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 18:28:07 -0700 Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:28:09 -0700 From: Eric Dan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060507012809.GA5400@box.myhome.westell.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060505065259.GA5583@box.myhome.westell.com> <20060505070910.GA5349@box.myhome.westell.com> <445B4F4D.2020207@scls.lib.wi.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445B4F4D.2020207@scls.lib.wi.us> X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.16-beyond (i686) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Probable-Spam: no X-Spam-Report: none X-Scanned-By: smtp.ucla.edu on 169.232.46.136 Subject: Re: 6.1 install problems with creating partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 01:28:10 -0000 I actually followed both the handbook and "The Complete FreeBSD" book's installtion carefully, and yet i still get the same error, the installer can't create the file system and install aborts. I've tried using the auto option for both fdisk and disklable, i've tried shared os, i've tried sacrificing the entire disk. Is this really me making a mistake or is it possible that the iso has some problems. here are the errors: http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/DD2B7N18.html * Greg Barniskis (nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) wrote: > Eric Dan wrote: > >update: > >I actually backed up the ext3 to another hard drive and got > >rid of all > >partitions and slices on that drive. > >installer still can't do it. > >the exact error says: > >"unable to make new root file system on ad3sa1" > >then i hit return and it says: > >"couldn't make file system properly" > > > >any ideas? > > > > > > > >* Eric Dan (ericdan@ucla.edu) wrote: > >>trying to install 6.1 on my secondary master partition or > >>slice 2. > >>I come from linux so please be forgiving with the naming or > >>slices and > >>partitions. > >>i created a 40G slice on ad3 with fdisk, then with disklabel > >>i created a > >>4g / a 512M swap and the rest for /home > >>i used the "S" option on the "/" partition. > > You may need to drop some more assumptions that you are > bringing from the Linux world -- you seem to be trying to > manually impose "the Linux way" of dividing up the space, but > that is really not what a typical FreeBSD partition/slice > scheme looks like. > > As long as you have essentially wiped the drive already, you > can use the FreeBSD installer's "Auto Defaults" option to get > a look at what the installer is expecting you to do, and then > tune that as desired. On the FDISK screen, press A to use the > whole disk, then on the Disklabel screen press A again for > Auto Defaults. > > Or, have a closer look at the handbook for more details, > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-steps.html > (esp. figure 2-22) > > > -- > Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator > South Central Library System (SCLS) > Library Interchange Network (LINK) > , (608) 266-6348 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Eric Dan ericdan@ucla.edu UCLA ID#103297286 http://www.vladuz976.com/ GPG key: FD13E94D ( B9D1 7D8D 34E0 D0B7 D3C9 4571 0BAC 1DC7 FD13 E94D) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 01:29:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFB616A41B for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688B443D9D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:29:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A29C290C6F; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:29:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10359-05; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:29:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009E4290C2C; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:29:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A600F5C775; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:29:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14535C1BE; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:29:42 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:29:42 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Ian Moore In-Reply-To: <200605071004.16725.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Message-ID: <20060506222821.R36981@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <200605071004.16725.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 01:29:55 -0000 On Sun, 7 May 2006, Ian Moore wrote: > On Sunday 07 May 2006 09:10, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> I've been using pine *forever* now and am finding it really hard to find a >> good GUI to replace it :( Tried kmail, didn't like it ... >> >> Off the top of my head, the only thing(s) it needs to do is: >> >> multiple identities >> IMAP >> PGP >> >> As much as I hate admitting doing things under Windows, I have used Eudora >> in the past and like its interface, but, alas, there is no Eudora for Unix >> > > I use kmail (part of kde) which is also very nice and will do all the above. I tried it, and was turned off very question ... my first beef ... I couldn't seem to select multiple messags in the thread window to do a mass operation on it ... for instance, in eudora, I could do 'shift-' to highlight several articles ... under kmail, the up/dn arrow scrolls the bottom message window ;( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 01:32:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CBD16A467 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4479B43D62 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:32:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E05E290C73 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:32:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05657-10 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:32:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D81C290C6F for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:32:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8943D49F55; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:32:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8556649E30 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 22:32:44 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:32:44 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Remote 'viewing / control' of X Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 01:32:42 -0000 I'm dealing with a situation where I'm migrating ppl over to using X vs M$ Windows ... I'd like to be able to help them out remotely, similar to how I can with VNC for Windows ... Is there something similar for Unix that would allow me to 'piggyback' in such a way that they're X desktop is an xterm on my machine, so that I can move their mouse around, show them the steps to do something, etc? Thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 01:43:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89B216A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agh@tpg.com.au) Received: from mail8.tpgi.com.au (mail8.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB2543D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:43:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from agh@tpg.com.au) X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed Received: from localhost.madcat (220-244-72-6.static.tpgi.com.au [220.244.72.6]) by mail8.tpgi.com.au (envelope-from agh@tpg.com.au) (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k471gT2x029688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 May 2006 11:42:36 +1000 From: "Alastair G. Hogge" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 11:42:36 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060507013027.GB7351@piglet.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <20060507013027.GB7351@piglet.digitaltorque.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605071142.36507.agh@tpg.com.au> Cc: "Michael P. Soulier" Subject: Re: installing multiple kernels X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 01:43:41 -0000 On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:30, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > People, Michael, > Coming from Linux, I'm used to being able to build multiple kernels and > install them all, configuring the bootloader to pick one of them at boot > time. I can't find anything on doing this on FreeBSD. Is this possible? Have you tried INSTKERNNAME with your different kernel configs? For example: make kernel KERNCONF=GENERIC INSTKERNNAME=kernel.GENERIC make kernel KERNCONF=MADCAT.DEBUG INSTKERNNAME=kernel.MADCAT.DEBUG make kernel KERNCONF=MADCAT Will result in /boot/kernel.GENERIC, /boot/kernel.MADCAT.DEBUG & /boot/kernel any of which you can load from the boot loader > Thanks, Hope it helped > Mike Alastair From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 02:16:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B6816A42D; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aschleichmd@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay112-f24.bay112.hotmail.com [64.4.26.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D813A43D45; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:16:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aschleichmd@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 6 May 2006 19:16:09 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.26.200 by by112fd.bay112.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 02:16:07 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.35.17.57] X-Originating-Email: [aschleichmd@hotmail.com] X-Sender: aschleichmd@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <445D1729.8050002@freebsd.org> From: "Arno Schleich" To: cperciva@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 02:16:07 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 May 2006 02:16:09.0650 (UTC) FILETIME=[34736920:01C6717C] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 02:16:25 -0000 No, I upgraded to 6.0 a couple of days after it was released. That must have been eight or nine months ago ... m: Colin Percival >To: Arno Schleich >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: portupgrade >Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 14:37:45 -0700 > >Arno Schleich wrote: > > portugrade -a > > > > results in a repetitive rebuild of the package database whenever the > > database is accessed. > > > > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... Inappropriate > > file type or format - /var/db/pkg/pkgdb; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the > > pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 435 packages found (-0 > > +435) > >You probably recently upgraded from FreeBSD 5.x to FreeBSD 6.x: > >http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2006-04-14-portupgrade-errors.html > >Colin Percival _________________________________________________________________ Die Vielfalt der Optionen lässt Sie im Internet erfolgreich recherchieren. http://search.msn.at/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 02:19:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AB916A405 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:19:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aschleichmd@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay112-f35.bay112.hotmail.com [64.4.26.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6C843D6E for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:19:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aschleichmd@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 6 May 2006 19:19:00 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.26.200 by by112fd.bay112.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 02:18:59 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.35.17.57] X-Originating-Email: [aschleichmd@hotmail.com] X-Sender: aschleichmd@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <200605061346.06072.beech@mangohealth.org> From: "Arno Schleich" To: beech@mangohealth.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 02:18:59 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 May 2006 02:19:00.0134 (UTC) FILETIME=[9A113460:01C6717C] Cc: Subject: Re: portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 02:19:06 -0000 Thanks, that improved the behavior. What I don't understand though is why upgrading individual ports e. g. "portupgrade xyz" never resulted in that problem ... >From: Beech Rintoul >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >CC: Arno Schleich >Subject: Re: portupgrade >Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:45:49 -0800 > >On Saturday 06 May 2006 13:28, Arno Schleich wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I have observed the following behavior in portupgrade: > > > > The operation > > > > portugrade -a > > > > results in a repetitive rebuild of the package database whenever the > > database is accessed. > > > > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... Inappropriate >file > > type or format - /var/db/pkg/pkgdb; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the >pkgdb > > in /var/db/pkg ... - 435 packages found (-0 +435) > > >........................................................................... > >............................................................................ > >............................................................................ > >............................................................................ > >............................................................................ > >........................................................ done] > > ---> Backing up the old version > > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... Failed > > `Inappropriate file type or format'; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the >pkgdb > > in /var/db/pkg ... - 435 packages found (-0 +435) > > >........................................................................... > >............................................................................ > >............................................................................ > >............................................................................ > >............................................................................ > >........................................................ done] > > ---> Uninstalling the old version > > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... Inappropriate >file > > type or format - /var/db/pkg/pkgdb; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the >pkgdb > > in /var/db/pkg ... - 435 packages found (-0 +435) > > >........................................................................... > >........................... > > > > > > Is this a bug or a feature ? > > > > What can be done to suppress this behavior of portupgrade -a ? > > > > Thanks, Arno > >Sounds like your pkgdb is corrupt. Try doing "pkgdb -fu" (without the >quotes), >if that doesn't work rename or rm /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db and run the command >again to build a new pkgdb. > >Beech > > > >-- > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@mangohealth.org >/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Mangohealth >\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 > X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 >/ \ - XanGo - http://www.mangohealth.org >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > ><< attach3 >> _________________________________________________________________ Nur die MSN Suche sorgt bei einer Web-Recherche für optimale Ergebnisse. http://search.msn.at/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 02:27:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA22B16A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from msa1-mx.centurytel.net (msa1-mx.centurytel.net [209.142.136.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7DC43D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:27:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (69-179-6-50.dyn.centurytel.net [69.179.6.50]) by msa1-mx.centurytel.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k472RpYm008849 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 21:27:51 -0500 Message-ID: <445D5B26.2040605@centurytel.net> Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 21:27:50 -0500 From: "Michael D. Norwick" User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Can't build bash3.1 during portupgrade -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 02:27:53 -0000 freebsd 6.1 RELEASE Compaq Proliant SMP PII-200 (smp modified kernel) Over a week ago I was trying to rebuild Xorg and ran into an issue with libexpat.so.5 not found for 'fc-cache'. This was my fault because earlier I wanted expat2, built it from the 'ports' collection tarball current (at that time) from ftp2.us.FreeBSD.org, and apparently broke the dependency for libexpat.so.5. Following the advice given to another user on freebsd-questions, I did pkgdb -F then portupgrade -a in order to fix the dependencies and get Xorg 6.9.0. Little did I know that it would take over a week to upgrade and rebuild 119 installed packages on my PII-200 SMP Proliant. Other than a couple of burps with boost-python and postgresql, the upgrade has kept chugging along. Today, I am almost to the end and the Mozilla build flaked out. No worries on that yet, but the script suggested doing pkgdb -F again and restarting portupgrade. I dutifully followed and when portupgrade restarted it tried to build bash31aborted with the following error which I do not understand. When the 'make bash31' stopped on error the first time I manually downloaded the whole bash31 file set again to /usr/ports/distfiles/bash from ftp4.us and re-ran portupgrade -a. It stopped again with the same error. What is happening here? => MD5 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. ...snip And then; => Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.1-patches//. fetch: bash31-010: local modification time does not match remote ...snip stop Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 03:41:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D5316A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 03:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D07E43D49 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 03:41:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fca9I-0000iG-C1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 05:41:36 +0200 Received: from sausages.cache.ed.ac.uk ([129.215.16.39]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 05:41:36 +0200 Received: from matt by sausages.cache.ed.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 05:41:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Matt Bostock Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 03:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 15 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 129.215.16.39 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060324 Ubuntu/dapper Firefox/1.5.0.1) Sender: news Subject: Jails won't start when using /etc/rc.d/jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 03:41:40 -0000 Hi, I'm using EZJail (http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/ezjail/) on FreeBSD 6.0. EZJail uses the /etc/rc.d/jail mechanism. My problem is that whilst I can start a jail using the 'jail' command manually (and type commands, start services etc in the jail), when I try to start it with /etc/rc.d/jail, it seems to start (/var/log/console.log is written to with the date) and then die. 'jls' will not show the new jail, and no processes are running inside it - I presume it is entirely dead. I'd be very grateful if anyone can point me in the right direction. Many thanks, Matt :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 03:50:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F1716A405 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 03:50:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60013.mail.yahoo.com (web60013.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CA1843D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 03:50:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 7605 invoked by uid 60001); 7 May 2006 03:50:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yEzT0yM+CALSaW16mJf8cSHfC84OQIynK9vhXT68DuCdGkTPd7WrGtOhuZPpiJslCxrlJLtgWM5oS9+6m3n65CLyidKGMNbEu+x5//ji9i+1nJMkZzfhw9E7qpnAum/EJ4MRLknTTmTV+QpQymkxIlfLUtSNe9beXJxYA7ff0RI= ; Message-ID: <20060507035011.7603.qmail@web60013.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.81.189.3] by web60013.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 06 May 2006 23:50:11 EDT Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 23:50:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter To: "Michael D. Norwick" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <445D5B26.2040605@centurytel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Can't build bash3.1 during portupgrade -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 03:50:13 -0000 --- "Michael D. Norwick" wrote: > freebsd 6.1 RELEASE Compaq Proliant SMP PII-200 (smp modified kernel) > > Over a week ago I was trying to rebuild Xorg and ran into an issue > with > libexpat.so.5 not found for 'fc-cache'. This was my fault because > earlier I wanted expat2, built it from the 'ports' collection > tarball > current (at that time) from ftp2.us.FreeBSD.org, and apparently broke > the dependency for libexpat.so.5. Following the advice given to > another > user on freebsd-questions, I did pkgdb -F then portupgrade -a in > order > to fix the dependencies and get Xorg 6.9.0. Little did I know that > it > would take over a week to upgrade and rebuild 119 installed packages > on > my PII-200 SMP Proliant. Other than a couple of burps with > boost-python > and postgresql, the upgrade has kept chugging along. Today, I am > almost > to the end and the Mozilla build flaked out. No worries on that yet, > but the script suggested doing pkgdb -F again and restarting > portupgrade. I dutifully followed and when portupgrade restarted it > tried to build bash31aborted with the following error which I do not > understand. When the 'make bash31' stopped on error the first time I > manually downloaded the whole bash31 file set again to > /usr/ports/distfiles/bash from ftp4.us and re-ran portupgrade -a. It > stopped again with the same error. What is happening here? > > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. > ...snip > And then; > > => Attempting to fetch from > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.1-patches//. > fetch: bash31-010: local modification time does not match remote > ...snip > > stop Are you sure you removed the distfiles or did you try to download over them? You should delete them. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 03:50:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CB616A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 03:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE6943D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 03:50:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1108949pya for ; Sat, 06 May 2006 20:50:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-mobile:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e3Ul/nXBYtLrstGKI8JYE81d0O/MnwysRQwCQuvnl4vWx/+BZYeXVDnQFzdZIMQCMvbeeL+EHZe86XXIkGNSFiKMPj0ktY/FZFVC/RlSZH4FtobgYJ2Dx7iD4v0sKcEgnHCYftRyar9c5a0bCN0XFlN1E9ibAbDfYrbn/u04DLY= Received: by 10.35.91.10 with SMTP id t10mr1087158pyl; Sat, 06 May 2006 20:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ( [203.145.188.130]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 60sm946751pyg.2006.05.06.20.50.36; Sat, 06 May 2006 20:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <445D6E7F.9000603@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:20:23 +0530 From: Subhro Organization: IBM Advanced Career Education User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mobile: +919831064613 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote 'viewing / control' of X Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 03:50:43 -0000 Marc G. Fournier sat at his 'puter and typed on 5/7/2006 7:02: > > I'm dealing with a situation where I'm migrating ppl over to using X > vs M$ Windows ... I'd like to be able to help them out remotely, > similar to how I can with VNC for Windows ... > > Is there something similar for Unix that would allow me to 'piggyback' > in such a way that they're X desktop is an xterm on my machine, so > that I can move their mouse around, show them the steps to do > something, etc? VNC had also been ported to FreeBSD. You can try something like tightvnc. Thanks and Best Regards Subhro From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 04:03:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C321816A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 04:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: from web54007.mail.yahoo.com (web54007.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E7FE43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 04:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 73579 invoked by uid 60001); 7 May 2006 04:03:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xaCRRo3E+F+C+UeB48ONDa1yvrjLZ+xu4q9Eb9sbBV3k6FMIXH8L3pLiMRqrh2kyJtI7pnDMiOfuYMs8Di3g0Kr05PeA/4/fxfgrsUojCe/qHppN+PHcIxOKOMUZgU0SpGUiFp984NW5GgLzi/oqZgg7V+2jvRszfph3UIi0HL0= ; Message-ID: <20060507040348.73577.qmail@web54007.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [71.140.186.33] by web54007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 06 May 2006 21:03:48 PDT Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:03:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Marciano To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Question regarding bus_dma_tag_create() . X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 04:03:49 -0000 Hi. The man page for bus_dma_map_create() says this about the "nsegments" parameter: Number of discontinuities (scatter/gather seg- ments) allowed in a DMA mapped region. If there is no restriction, BUS_SPACE_UNRESTRICTED may be specified. BUS_SPACE_UNRESTRICTED is #defined as (~0). Then, in busdma_map_create() and busdma_mem_alloc(): if (dmat->segments == NULL) { dmat->segments = (bus_dma_segment_t *)malloc( sizeof(bus_dma_segment_t) * dmat->nsegments, M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT); ... } I don't understand how this works when BUS_SPACE_UNRESTRICTED is specified. The malloc will be fed a -8 (or -12 with PAE) on i386. I'm reviewing a driver at work that specifies nsegments = 0, which I think is invalid, but in reading the man page I came across this ~0 option, which I've also seen in other FreeBSD drivers and I just don't get it. I hope someone can clue me in. Thanks, Paul. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 05:33:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E51B16A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD2A43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:33:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.66.115]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060507053353.ECZB8718.mta9.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:33:53 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 81332B843; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:34:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 01:34:16 -0400 From: Parv To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20060507053416.GA4701@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote 'viewing / control' of X Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 05:33:54 -0000 in message <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org>, wrote Marc G. Fournier thusly... > > I'm dealing with a situation where I'm migrating ppl over to using > X vs M$ Windows ... I'd like to be able to help them out remotely, > similar to how I can with VNC for Windows ... > > Is there something similar for Unix that would allow me to > 'piggyback' in such a way that they're X desktop is an xterm on my > machine, so that I can move their mouse around, show them the > steps to do something, etc? I don't think one could use plain VNC (realvnc, tightvnc & such) to move mouse on already running X session. Please let me know if that is possible. There, however, is x11vnc port (net/x11vnc) which can connects to already running X instance which should fulfill Marc's requirement. See also x2vnc (x11-servers/x2vnc) port. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 05:42:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A09216A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884D043D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:41:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA29163; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:39:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from ppp-62-245-162-129.mnet-online.de(62.245.162.129) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma029161; Sun, 7 May 06 07:39:00 +0200 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k475fZ7D002012; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:41:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 07:41:34 +0200 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20060507054134.GA1693@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE (i386) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias.Apitz@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 05:42:00 -0000 El día Saturday, May 06, 2006 a las 08:40:02PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier escribió: > > I've been using pine *forever* now and am finding it really hard to find a > good GUI to replace it :( Tried kmail, didn't like it ... > > Off the top of my head, the only thing(s) it needs to do is: > > multiple identities > IMAP > PGP xterm+fetchmail+mutt+vi is all you need; anything else is just not usefull for real work; matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC PICA GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ http://guru.UnixLand.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 06:03:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237D616A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 06:03:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ow.Mun.Heng@wdc.com) Received: from mail.globalsuite.net (mail.globalsuite.net [69.46.103.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC8C43D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 06:03:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Ow.Mun.Heng@wdc.com) Received: from neuromancer.home.net (unknown [65.205.219.195]) by mail.globalsuite.net (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 42934B00 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:03:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from neuromancer.home.net (neuromancer.home.net [127.0.0.1]) by neuromancer.home.net (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4762wtW008040; Sat, 6 May 2006 23:02:59 -0700 From: Ow Mun Heng To: Parv In-Reply-To: <20060507053416.GA4701@holestein.holy.cow> References: <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507053416.GA4701@holestein.holy.cow> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 23:02:58 -0700 Message-Id: <1146981778.30226.4.camel@neuromancer.home.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote 'viewing / control' of X Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 06:03:15 -0000 On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 01:34 -0400, Parv wrote: > in message <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org>, > wrote Marc G. Fournier thusly... > > > > I'm dealing with a situation where I'm migrating ppl over to using > > X vs M$ Windows ... I'd like to be able to help them out remotely, > > similar to how I can with VNC for Windows ... > > > > Is there something similar for Unix that would allow me to > > 'piggyback' in such a way that they're X desktop is an xterm on my > > machine, so that I can move their mouse around, show them the > > steps to do something, etc? > > I don't think one could use plain VNC (realvnc, tightvnc & such) to > move mouse on already running X session. Please let me know if that > is possible. Coming from a Linux background, There _is_ such support. There's one called 'vino' * net-misc/vino Latest version available: 2.12.0 Latest version installed: 2.12.0 Size of downloaded files: 1,654 kB Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/ Description: An integrated VNC server for GNOME License: GPL-2 which essentially does that. it connects to a running session. If not mistaken, there is a VNC server edition that does that too > > There, however, is x11vnc port (net/x11vnc) which can connects to > already running X instance which should fulfill Marc's requirement. > See also x2vnc (x11-servers/x2vnc) port. > > > - Parv > -- Ow Mun Heng Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM 98% Microsoft(tm) Free!! Neuromancer 23:02:42 up 9:32, 3 users, load average: 1.79, 1.19, 0.90 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 06:03:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1637E16A410 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 06:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bigby@ephemeron.org) Received: from dsl.ephemeron.org (dsl092-035-072.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.35.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDC143D55 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 06:03:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bigby@ephemeron.org) Received: from home.ephemeron.org (root@home.fake.net [10.0.2.3]) by dsl.ephemeron.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4763pIG017175; Sat, 6 May 2006 23:03:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bigby@ephemeron.org) Received: from home.ephemeron.org (bigby@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.ephemeron.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4764OkD093843; Sat, 6 May 2006 23:04:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bigby@ephemeron.org) Received: from localhost (bigby@localhost) by home.ephemeron.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k4764NgZ093840; Sat, 6 May 2006 23:04:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bigby@ephemeron.org) X-Authentication-Warning: home.ephemeron.org: bigby owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 23:04:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Bigby Findrake To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20060504161553.GA98295@thought.org> Message-ID: <20060506225211.W82917@home.ephemeron.org> References: <20060504161553.GA98295@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: How do I set up an IRC site? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 06:03:53 -0000 On Thu, 4 May 2006, Gary Kline wrote: > Folks, > > I'm thinking of setting up an IRC page on my website so I > can chat (live) with just a few people. Are there any tutorials > on this? Othr than using GAIM and ymessenger, the last time I > did live chat was circa 1991 with the write utility. So beyond > that, I'm clueless. I use hybrid (http://ircd-hybrid.com/) for the ircd - I chose that for its reputed stability. Hybrid's not the most featureful ircd out there, but it's been great to me. I added on hybserv (http://www.hybserv.net/) for services. For the web front-end part, I've tried several, from java clients to a cgi gateway. pjirc (http://www.pjirc.com/about.php) is a very sweet java applet. It's free, slick looking, very configurable (on the back/admin end) and very featureful as java clients go. Some limitations of java clients is that your clients need network access to the irc server (some sites/networks/companies/etc. block irc access) and you need java (which not all browsers/OSes support). That's why I also offer a cgi-to-irc (http://cgiirc.sourceforge.net/) gateway. It's a bit clunky, but it allows people who can't use the java client (for one of the above reasons) to still connect to irc via the web. /-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Who made the world I cannot tell; 'Tis made, and here am I in hell. My hand, though now my knuckles bleed, I never soiled with such a deed. -- A. E. Housman finger://bigby@ephemeron.org http://www.ephemeron.org/~bigby/ irc://irc.ephemeron.org/#the_pub news://news.ephemeron.org/alt.lemurs /-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 06:55:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448D716A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 06:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C988A43D49 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 06:55:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.66.115]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060507065515.GWKQ8718.mta9.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:55:15 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71B00B843; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:55:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 02:55:39 -0400 From: Parv To: Ow Mun Heng Message-ID: <20060507065539.GA6330@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Ow Mun Heng , "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507053416.GA4701@holestein.holy.cow> <1146981778.30226.4.camel@neuromancer.home.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1146981778.30226.4.camel@neuromancer.home.net> Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote 'viewing / control' of X Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 06:55:17 -0000 in message <1146981778.30226.4.camel@neuromancer.home.net>, wrote Ow Mun Heng thusly... > > On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 01:34 -0400, Parv wrote: > > in message <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org>, > > wrote Marc G. Fournier thusly... > > > > > > I'm dealing with a situation where I'm migrating ppl over to using > > > X vs M$ Windows ... I'd like to be able to help them out remotely, > > > similar to how I can with VNC for Windows ... > > > > > > Is there something similar for Unix that would allow me to > > > 'piggyback' in such a way that they're X desktop is an xterm on my > > > machine, so that I can move their mouse around, show them the > > > steps to do something, etc? > > > > I don't think one could use plain VNC (realvnc, tightvnc & such) to > > move mouse on already running X session. Please let me know if that > > is possible. > > Coming from a Linux background, There _is_ such support. There's one > called 'vino' > * net-misc/vino > Latest version available: 2.12.0 > Latest version installed: 2.12.0 > Size of downloaded files: 1,654 kB > Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/ > Description: An integrated VNC server for GNOME > License: GPL-2 > > which essentially does that. it connects to a running session. Thanks for the additional data. Looking at the dependency list, vino seems to be appropriate only for those who have large part of gnome already installed. > If not mistaken, there is a VNC server edition that does that too ... > > There, however, is x11vnc port (net/x11vnc) which can connects to > > already running X instance which should fulfill Marc's requirement. > > See also x2vnc (x11-servers/x2vnc) port. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 07:07:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF36B16A419 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CBA43D53 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:07:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10D2290C38; Sun, 7 May 2006 04:07:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59882-01; Sun, 7 May 2006 04:07:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78358290C2C; Sun, 7 May 2006 04:07:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BEE9C4759C; Sun, 7 May 2006 04:07:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23D43C5C4; Sun, 7 May 2006 04:07:09 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 04:07:09 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Parv In-Reply-To: <20060507065539.GA6330@holestein.holy.cow> Message-ID: <20060507040633.S36981@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507053416.GA4701@holestein.holy.cow> <1146981778.30226.4.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <20060507065539.GA6330@holestein.holy.cow> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Ow Mun Heng , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote 'viewing / control' of X Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 07:07:13 -0000 On Sun, 7 May 2006, Parv wrote: > in message <1146981778.30226.4.camel@neuromancer.home.net>, > wrote Ow Mun Heng thusly... >> >> On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 01:34 -0400, Parv wrote: >>> in message <20060506223053.X36981@ganymede.hub.org>, >>> wrote Marc G. Fournier thusly... >>>> >>>> I'm dealing with a situation where I'm migrating ppl over to using >>>> X vs M$ Windows ... I'd like to be able to help them out remotely, >>>> similar to how I can with VNC for Windows ... >>>> >>>> Is there something similar for Unix that would allow me to >>>> 'piggyback' in such a way that they're X desktop is an xterm on my >>>> machine, so that I can move their mouse around, show them the >>>> steps to do something, etc? >>> >>> I don't think one could use plain VNC (realvnc, tightvnc & such) to >>> move mouse on already running X session. Please let me know if that >>> is possible. >> >> Coming from a Linux background, There _is_ such support. There's one >> called 'vino' >> * net-misc/vino >> Latest version available: 2.12.0 >> Latest version installed: 2.12.0 >> Size of downloaded files: 1,654 kB >> Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/ >> Description: An integrated VNC server for GNOME >> License: GPL-2 >> >> which essentially does that. it connects to a running session. > > Thanks for the additional data. > > Looking at the dependency list, vino seems to be appropriate only > for those who have large part of gnome already installed. That was what I found also, and I'm using KDE on our machines ... x11vnc seems to work well though, just installed it and can easily work with the remote machine ... Thx ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 07:10:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A4816A409 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from havoc.unixathome.org (havoc.unixathome.org [66.154.98.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D1243D53 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA9C5647C for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:10:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from havoc.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (havoc.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hSWNaRnucLdg for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 09C1256476; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060507071002.09C1256476@havoc.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-04-16 - 2006-05-06 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 07:10:19 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 09:19:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0852616A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars.udo@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4603143D55 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:19:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.udo@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i24so804307wra for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 02:19:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=kkQp+MH6yH9Iak80sMNjJ6JQqQkwM77W/yHBAV094uAZg9CoBl6G7b0A8LV9Z0TNqmxzGX3UxWXfVGD2lk7MS+ksqJ78qohxu4wW63z2tuVO2i28hkQNgwwZ5ZqMZ8oo9+pUkonWx8KqRO/VO34GePq+FGav7XCZxFnJdolnqGk= Received: by 10.54.116.17 with SMTP id o17mr1098547wrc; Sun, 07 May 2006 02:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.106.9 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2fef08390605070219i1b7acf96paa17087a0cde7bc5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:19:44 +0300 From: "Lars Udo" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: wlan on lowend laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:19:46 -0000 i have a litlle problem with all these wires running here and there in my flat, and as i got a woman living here with me.. i cant stand her complaining about those ugly wires allover the house. One beautiful day, i decided to get involved with wlan. But this one linux-dude said that my p233mmx/64ram couldnt run wlan. I dont know if he ment WAP/WEP-encryption a= s he couldnt be any spesific and that got me thinking if he even knows anything. My setup these days is following: 1Ghz/256ddr (Desktop mahcine, with ssh Xforwarding) via 10Mbit LAN, and my laptop just happens to get a lot faster when i run all apps on that desktop-pc. My desktop is FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and laptop has NetBSD 3.0 with standalone X & few apps just to survive if my desktop-pc is down. I'm planning to change into FreeNX if it gives any advantage, but that would require to replace my laptop with freebsd as it i= s my favorite OS that has FreeNX client. Is it possible to keep up with this setup with changin all the wires with wireless-future. If WAP/WEP is the problem, couldn i just leave it out and use IPsec, or ssh instead? Or is WAP/WEP mandatory, or is it just enough if i set tight firewall-rules on both ends of wlan with IPsec, so no one could intrude into my system. If all goes well, my next sted would be to include one windows-pc also.. an= d that would need firewall for local wlan-crackers but somehow i dont believe that as a minor threat :) Lasse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 09:29:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2E616A402 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B6043D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:29:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13186) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FcfZc-000Ev3-QD; Sun, 07 May 2006 09:29:08 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E46958110C; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:29:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from http.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBA358110B; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:29:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78D158C6FA; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:29:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <445DBDE1.8040904@scii.nl> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 11:29:05 +0200 From: albi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars Udo References: <2fef08390605070219i1b7acf96paa17087a0cde7bc5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2fef08390605070219i1b7acf96paa17087a0cde7bc5@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wlan on lowend laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:29:10 -0000 Lars Udo wrote: > My desktop is FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and laptop has NetBSD 3.0 with standalone > X & few apps just to survive if > my desktop-pc is down. I'm planning to change into FreeNX if it gives any > advantage, but that would require to replace my laptop with freebsd as > it is > my favorite OS that has FreeNX client. > > Is it possible to keep up with this setup with changin all the wires with > wireless-future. If WAP/WEP is the problem, couldn i just leave it out and > use IPsec, or ssh instead? Or is WAP/WEP mandatory, or is it just enough if > i set tight firewall-rules on both ends of wlan with IPsec, so no one could > intrude into my system. FreeNX uses ssh already, and you can enable SSL in it also, so it sounds to me that it's a matter of restricting access from and to your wireless (ip-address/mac-address e.g.) (if you're really paranoid : WEP is cracked already, and certain setups of WPA are also not so secure :-) -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 09:39:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6810C16A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars.udo@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5E843D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:39:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.udo@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i24so805384wra for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 02:39:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dq10FRCYzVivewsB4xZKupEc8Luhjx2DKPRBeu6VCzz59mYC351TNg3+EAdFiP3mkjPWTyaGqTaePHY6m9IzW8QoRJ6Qn/T41pBe/G8+Qtm/bF7/Q4lJiXwHI1v/oA7XyHZESSpPW6FRl5obss9RzZo6Ozo0wOiRQW9e8sbHh+w= Received: by 10.54.102.11 with SMTP id z11mr1086174wrb; Sun, 07 May 2006 02:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.106.9 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2fef08390605070239x5b79f986m6763299dd07dfa9a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:39:26 +0300 From: "Lars Udo" To: albi In-Reply-To: <445DBDE1.8040904@scii.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2fef08390605070219i1b7acf96paa17087a0cde7bc5@mail.gmail.com> <445DBDE1.8040904@scii.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wlan on lowend laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:39:28 -0000 Security is no problem to me, but the problem that i'm most worried is my budjet. If my laptop cant run wlan (for some weird reason that linux guy couldnt even name) so all the effort would be worthless. 2006/5/7, albi : > > Lars Udo wrote: > > > My desktop is FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and laptop has NetBSD 3.0 with > standalone > > X & few apps just to survive if > > my desktop-pc is down. I'm planning to change into FreeNX if it gives > any > > advantage, but that would require to replace my laptop with freebsd as > > it is > > my favorite OS that has FreeNX client. > > > > Is it possible to keep up with this setup with changin all the wires > with > > wireless-future. If WAP/WEP is the problem, couldn i just leave it out > and > > use IPsec, or ssh instead? Or is WAP/WEP mandatory, or is it just enoug= h > if > > i set tight firewall-rules on both ends of wlan with IPsec, so no one > could > > intrude into my system. > > FreeNX uses ssh already, and you can enable SSL in it also, so it sounds > to me that it's a matter of restricting access from and to your wireless > (ip-address/mac-address e.g.) > > (if you're really paranoid : WEP is cracked already, and certain setups > of WPA are also not so secure :-) > > -- > grtjs, albi > gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 09:44:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D378B16A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3EF43D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:44:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip04.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.20]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IYW002O631QFED0@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 06:44:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip04.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 06:44:01 -0300 Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 06:43:14 -0300 From: Duane Whitty To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <445DC132.7060405@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060503) Subject: ULE Scheduler and overall performance on 6.x - Wow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:44:01 -0000 Hi, I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28). when I last built 6-STABLE Anyhow it seems great. I'm running a 2.4GHz Celeron with 512MB RAM and two 40GB, PATA disks. Right now I'm running both a GNOME and a KDE session, I've got Thunderbird and Evolution open, Firefox is running and running well, and I'm updating the my local copy of the FreeBSD repository. Oh yeah, I'm also running a DNS server, a Sendmail server, and SAMBA I can't believe how responsive everything is on this low-end machine I'm running. Wow! (And this with debugging turned on but no WITNESS or INVARIANTS turned on) Well time to rebuild the sources :) dwpc@ /home/duane>uname -a FreeBSD dwpc.dwlabs.ca 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #0: Fri Apr 28 18:41:15 ADT 2006 duane@dwpc.dwlabs.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DWPC-KERNEL i386 Best Regards, Duane Whitty -- duane@greenmeadow.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 10:44:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AF016A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 10:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from exiaf_radar_guy38@yahoo.co.in) Received: from web8905.mail.in.yahoo.com (web8905.mail.in.yahoo.com [203.84.221.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9B0643D49 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 10:44:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from exiaf_radar_guy38@yahoo.co.in) Received: (qmail 8388 invoked by uid 60001); 7 May 2006 10:44:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mrFdM1UrYGUfGsTHbbqb4WU+yTwOvJCPVW/A7dPS3Pua/7+6l2aEJUqgnjNZb/46B/6dZ94cs/sH+dnKAKAFRCI/7kQV3tlY96ErPc9zmTVMhNBiLaF+MsixQdeNOl5kku9ReQP4sb4rUaJafPLJgjPQEfIWDm8TIBzybhat7MQ= ; Message-ID: <20060507104407.8386.qmail@web8905.mail.in.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.134.197.180] by web8905.mail.in.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 11:44:07 BST Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 11:44:07 +0100 (BST) From: dharam paul To: Frank Steinborn , freebsd In-Reply-To: <20060502164704.GB74516@shodan.nognu.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: N00b: shutting down freebsd server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 10:44:11 -0000 Hello Seniors, I think it supports ACPI. When I press the power button it sends signal 15, then it stops the processes. Then it shuts down the system. Regards --- Frank Steinborn wrote: > dharam paul wrote: > > Hello Seniors, > > Is it ok to shutdown a freebsd server from atx > power > > button? > > > > regards > > If your server supports ACPI and it's shutting down > clean, it's OK. > But if your power-button switches your system off > immediatly, use > shutdown -p now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new. http://in.answers.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 10:44:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D3F16A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 10:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604AB43D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 10:44:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i24so809115wra for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 03:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.60.26 with SMTP id i26mr1046653wra; Sun, 07 May 2006 03:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [216.45.217.148]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 28sm1444291wrl.2006.05.07.03.44.12; Sun, 07 May 2006 03:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 06:44:14 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <200605070946.26938.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> References: <4456899A.8080201@fusemail.com> <200605070946.26938.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060507063900.D6E6.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.25 [en] Subject: Re: video players broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 10:44:15 -0000 Ian Moore wrote: > On Tuesday 02 May 2006 07:50, Brian John wrote: > > Gerard Seibert wrote: > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0500, Brian John wrote: > > >>> Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:59:42PM -0500, Brian John wrote: > > >>>>> Hi, I just upgraded my ports and now all of my video players either > > >>>>> won't install, or they won't start up. I've tried 4 different ones, > > >>>>> here is what happens with each: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> vlc: won't install > > >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libmatroska.so: undefined reference to > > >>>>> `libebml::CodedSizeLength(unsigned long long, unsigned int)' > > >>>>> gmake[2]: *** [vlc] Error 1 > > >>>>> gmake[2]: Leaving directory > > >>>>> `/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/vlc-0.8.4a' gmake[1]: *** > > >>>>> [all-recursive] Error 1 > > >>>>> gmake[1]: Leaving directory > > >>>>> `/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/vlc-0.8.4a' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > > >>>>> *** Error code 2 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> totem: won't start up > > >>>>> [brian@brianjohn /usr/ports/multimedia/totem]$ totem & > > >>>>> [1] 8150 > > >>>>> [brian@brianjohn /usr/ports/multimedia/totem]$ /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: > > >>>>> Shared object "libglib-2.0.so.600" not found, required by > > >>>>> "libgnome-keyring.so.0" > > >>>>> > > >>>>> xine: this one starts up, but then closes right away, with no error > > >>>>> > > >>>>> mplayer: won't install, get several errors similar to this > > >>>>> /usr/X11R6/lib/libxmms.so: undefined reference to > > >>>>> `gtk_widget_get_type' /usr/X11R6/lib/libxmms.so: undefined reference > > >>>>> to `gtk_vbox_new' gmake: *** [mencoder] Error 1 > > >>>>> *** Error code 2 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Can someone please help me out? > > >>>> > > >>>> You didn't upgrade your ports completely; you have an inconsistent mix > > >>>> of old and new libraries on your system. portupgrade -a, or if that > > >>>> fails, portupgrade -fa. > > >>>> > > >>>> Kris > > >>> > > >>> I was using portmanager to upgrade. I've always used this before and > > >>> it's worked fine. I just type portmanager -u. Does that not work > > >>> anymore? > > >> > > >> No idea, I don't use portmanager. > > >> > > >> Kris > > > > > > Assuming you have an updated ports collection, it should work fine It > > > does on my system. > > > > > > I would recommend that you update your ports again and then run > > > 'portmanager -u -f -y -l' and see if that fixes the problem. At the very > > > least, a log file will be created '/var/log/portmanager.log' that might > > > help track down the problem. > > > > > > HTH > > > > Hi, thanks for the advice. I tried that command and it's been updating > > for a couple of days (takes so long because of the prompts that come up > > that stop the installs). Anyway, now portmanager always gets to a > > certain point and my computer reboots. I looked in the logfile and > > there isn't much there, this is at the end of the file: > > Sun Apr 30 16:36:17 2006 > > kdelibs-3.4.2_1 /x11/kdelibs3 > > OLD > > kdelibs-3.5.2_1 /x11/kdelibs3 > > > > Any idea what could be causing this? > > > > Thanks again for the help > > > > /Brian I did the same update without incident. You might want to place BATCH=yes in the /etc/make.conf file to stop those pesky prompts from appearing. It won't correct the reboots however. Are you sure it is being cause by a software problem and not a hardware situation? Is this just a spontaneous reboot or is a message of some type displayed? I am sure someone here probably has an answer for you though. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 11:36:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A04B16A403 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C388743D4C for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:36:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 16117 invoked from network); 7 May 2006 21:36:43 +1000 Received: from 124-168-22-164.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (124.168.22.164) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 7 May 2006 21:36:43 +1000 Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:36:39 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20060507213639.662d0332@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 11:36:45 -0000 On Sat, 6 May 2006 20:40:02 -0300 (ADT) "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > multiple identities > IMAP > PGP Hi Marc, give sylpheed-claws ( mail/sylpheed-claws port) a try - it is very fast and lean. I used to use thunderbird but I felt it was very heavy compared to sylpheed. I'm using 6 IMAP identities, 2 POP3 (for mailing lists), as weell as 2 SMTP only (to send via same server as different user). Try the -claws port , as it supports more features and plugins. Good luck, Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 12:54:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B4E16A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1DC43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:54:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1CACEB83F; Sun, 7 May 2006 14:54:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 14:54:36 +0200 From: Frank Steinborn To: dharam paul Mail-Followup-To: dharam paul , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060502164704.GB74516@shodan.nognu.de> <20060507104407.8386.qmail@web8905.mail.in.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060507104407.8386.qmail@web8905.mail.in.yahoo.com> Message-Id: <20060507125436.1CACEB83F@shodan.nognu.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: N00b: shutting down freebsd server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 12:54:40 -0000 dharam paul wrote: > Hello Seniors, > I think it supports ACPI. When I press the power > button it sends signal 15, then it stops the > processes. Then it shuts down the system. It's absolutely okay to use the power button to shutdown the system then. Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 13:23:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A6216A40A for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl (smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl [213.51.146.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8553343D49 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:23:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.146.189] (port=53861 helo=smtp2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl) by smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1FcjE2-0005YY-Ov; Sun, 07 May 2006 15:23:06 +0200 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:57583 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1FcjE1-0004RM-IY; Sun, 07 May 2006 15:23:05 +0200 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:22:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <200605071004.16725.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <20060506222821.R36981@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060506222821.R36981@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605071522.33643.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 13:23:11 -0000 On Sunday 07 May 2006 03:29, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Ian Moore wrote: > > On Sunday 07 May 2006 09:10, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> I've been using pine *forever* now and am finding it really hard to find > >> a good GUI to replace it :( Tried kmail, didn't like it ... > >> > >> Off the top of my head, the only thing(s) it needs to do is: > >> > >> multiple identities > >> IMAP > >> PGP > >> > >> As much as I hate admitting doing things under Windows, I have used > >> Eudora in the past and like its interface, but, alas, there is no Eudora > >> for Unix > > > > I use kmail (part of kde) which is also very nice and will do all the > > above. > > I tried it, and was turned off very question ... my first beef ... I > couldn't seem to select multiple messags in the thread window to do a mass > operation on it ... for instance, in eudora, I could do 'shift-' to > highlight several articles ... under kmail, the up/dn arrow scrolls the > bottom message window ;( As you've noticed the up and down keys are already used for scrolling in the content widget. Instead use shift or ctrl and the left mouse button instead or the + and - keys (go to latter/next unread message) or the arrow-left and arrow-right keys (go to latter/next message). See "Keyboard Shortcuts" in the KMail handbook which is the obvious place to look ;-) Finally, most core KDE apps have a settings -> shortcuts menu entry so you can even change the defaults. Some people call this bloat. Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 13:42:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E497C16A402 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABB243D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:42:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 38902 invoked by uid 89); 7 May 2006 23:41:59 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (eoghan@redry.net@213.202.156.171) by 0 with SMTP; 7 May 2006 23:41:59 +1000 Message-ID: <445DF920.6090206@redry.net> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 14:41:52 +0100 From: eoghan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507213639.662d0332@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060507213639.662d0332@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 13:42:03 -0000 Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Sat, 6 May 2006 20:40:02 -0300 (ADT) > "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > >> multiple identities >> IMAP >> PGP > > Hi Marc, > give sylpheed-claws ( mail/sylpheed-claws port) a try - it is very fast and > lean. I used to use thunderbird but I felt it was very heavy compared to > sylpheed. I'm using 6 IMAP identities, 2 POP3 (for mailing lists), as weell as > 2 SMTP only (to send via same server as different user). > > Try the -claws port , as it supports more features and plugins. > > Good luck, > Beto Once installed, whats the script called to start claws? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 13:48:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B12A16A408 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D3543D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so720866wxc for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 06:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.126.8 with SMTP id y8mr1244766wxc; Sun, 07 May 2006 06:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [216.45.217.148]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i19sm1387270wxd.2006.05.07.06.47.58; Sun, 07 May 2006 06:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:48:00 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <200605071522.33643.danny@ricin.com> References: <20060506222821.R36981@ganymede.hub.org> <200605071522.33643.danny@ricin.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060507094529.23BD.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.25 [en] Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 13:48:00 -0000 Danny Pansters wrote: > On Sunday 07 May 2006 03:29, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Ian Moore wrote: > > > On Sunday 07 May 2006 09:10, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > >> I've been using pine *forever* now and am finding it really hard to find > > >> a good GUI to replace it :( Tried kmail, didn't like it ... > > >> > > >> Off the top of my head, the only thing(s) it needs to do is: > > >> > > >> multiple identities > > >> IMAP > > >> PGP > > >> > > >> As much as I hate admitting doing things under Windows, I have used > > >> Eudora in the past and like its interface, but, alas, there is no Eudora > > >> for Unix > > > > > > I use kmail (part of kde) which is also very nice and will do all the > > > above. > > > > I tried it, and was turned off very question ... my first beef ... I > > couldn't seem to select multiple messags in the thread window to do a mass > > operation on it ... for instance, in eudora, I could do 'shift-' to > > highlight several articles ... under kmail, the up/dn arrow scrolls the > > bottom message window ;( > > As you've noticed the up and down keys are already used for scrolling in the > content widget. Instead use shift or ctrl and the left mouse button instead > or the + and - keys (go to latter/next unread message) or the arrow-left and > arrow-right keys (go to latter/next message). See "Keyboard Shortcuts" in the > KMail handbook which is the obvious place to look ;-) > > Finally, most core KDE apps have a settings -> shortcuts menu entry so you can > even change the defaults. Some people call this bloat. > > Dan If you need help with KMail and how to properly use and configure it, might I suggest the following list: KDE PIM users mailing list kdepim-users@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 13:50:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE39816A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB7C43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:50:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 98615B822; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:50:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:50:24 +0200 From: Frank Steinborn To: eoghan Mail-Followup-To: eoghan , Norberto Meijome , "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507213639.662d0332@localhost> <445DF920.6090206@redry.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445DF920.6090206@redry.net> Message-Id: <20060507135024.98615B822@shodan.nognu.de> Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Norberto Meijome , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 13:50:26 -0000 eoghan wrote: > Once installed, whats the script called to start claws? /usr/local/bin/sylpheed-claws (Make sure you typed "rehash in your shell just after installing) Hint: See pkg-plist in the directory of the port to find out what files will be installed, and where. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 13:54:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D834016A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BD943D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:54:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 50586 invoked by uid 89); 7 May 2006 23:54:21 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (eoghan@redry.net@213.202.156.171) by 0 with SMTP; 7 May 2006 23:54:21 +1000 Message-ID: <445DFC06.2080506@redry.net> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 14:54:14 +0100 From: eoghan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eoghan , Norberto Meijome , "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507213639.662d0332@localhost> <445DF920.6090206@redry.net> <20060507135024.98615B822@shodan.nognu.de> In-Reply-To: <20060507135024.98615B822@shodan.nognu.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 13:54:22 -0000 Frank Steinborn wrote: > eoghan wrote: >> Once installed, whats the script called to start claws? > > /usr/local/bin/sylpheed-claws (Make sure you typed "rehash in your > shell just after installing) > > Hint: See pkg-plist in the directory of the port to find out what > files will be installed, and where. Thanks I actually got it from /usr/X11R6/bin/sylpheed-claws doesnt seem to be in /usr/local/bin/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 14:09:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658A216A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 14:09:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: from smtpout07-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout07-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D13643D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 14:09:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: (qmail 20240 invoked from network); 7 May 2006 14:09:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (68.220.180.102) by smtpout07-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.233) with ESMTP; 07 May 2006 14:09:11 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) References: <352C1FEC-36FC-4A41-A133-4E827088E43A@hackmiester.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1945368E-20E9-4906-A240-F81DA824CE35@hackmiester.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Hunter Fuller Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 09:09:24 +0000 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: Fwd: wlan on lowend laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 14:09:12 -0000 Forgot to reply to list :X Begin forwarded message: > From: Hunter Fuller > Date: 7 May, 2006 9:08:33 AM GMT > To: "Lars Udo" > Subject: Re: wlan on lowend laptop > > > On 07 May 2006, at 9:19 AM, Lars Udo wrote: > >> i have a litlle problem with all these wires running here and >> there in my >> flat, and as i got a woman living here with me.. i cant stand her >> complaining about those ugly wires allover the house. One >> beautiful day, i >> decided to get involved with wlan. But this one linux-dude said >> that my >> p233mmx/64ram couldnt run wlan. > Lies, all lies! My P200/32mB RAM with 6.0-RELEASE acts as an AP or > a client with WEP, WPA, etc with no issues. >> I dont know if he ment WAP/WEP-encryption as >> he couldnt be any spesific and that got me thinking if he even knows >> anything. >> >> My setup these days is following: 1Ghz/256ddr (Desktop mahcine, >> with ssh >> Xforwarding) via 10Mbit LAN, >> and my laptop just happens to get a lot faster when i run all apps >> on that >> desktop-pc. > Good idea, does it lag at all? I'm thinking of configuring that. >> >> My desktop is FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and laptop has NetBSD 3.0 with >> standalone >> X & few apps just to survive if >> my desktop-pc is down. I'm planning to change into FreeNX if it >> gives any >> advantage, but that would require to replace my laptop with >> freebsd as it is >> my favorite OS that has FreeNX client. >> >> Is it possible to keep up with this setup with changin all the >> wires with >> wireless-future. If WAP/WEP is the problem, couldn i just leave it >> out and >> use IPsec, or ssh instead? > If you're really having issues... then yeah. >> Or is WAP/WEP mandatory, or is it just enough if >> i set tight firewall-rules on both ends of wlan with IPsec, so no >> one could >> intrude into my system. > Depends if you live around people or in the middle of nowhere. The > latter is the case for me, so I don't worry about security. >> >> If all goes well, my next sted would be to include one windows-pc >> also.. and >> that would need firewall for local wlan-crackers but somehow i >> dont believe >> that as a minor threat :) > It'd be fine, you just need proper firewalls, anti-virus, etc. >> >> Lasse >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 14:22:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F337216A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 14:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: from smtpout09-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout09-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8232243D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 14:22:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hackmiester@hackmiester.com) Received: (qmail 26071 invoked from network); 7 May 2006 14:22:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (68.220.180.102) by smtpout09-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.17) with ESMTP; 07 May 2006 14:22:09 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20060507104407.8386.qmail@web8905.mail.in.yahoo.com> References: <20060507104407.8386.qmail@web8905.mail.in.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Hunter Fuller Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 09:22:22 +0000 To: dharam paul X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd , Frank Steinborn Subject: Re: N00b: shutting down freebsd server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 14:22:11 -0000 On 07 May 2006, at 10:44 AM, dharam paul wrote: > Hello Seniors, > I think it supports ACPI. When I press the power > button it sends signal 15, then it stops the > processes. Then it shuts down the system. Perfect, it's shutting down cleanly then. yeah, it's fine to hit the atx button to halt it then... but don't hold it down, or it'll die uncleanly. > > Regards > --- Frank Steinborn wrote: > >> dharam paul wrote: >>> Hello Seniors, >>> Is it ok to shutdown a freebsd server from atx >> power >>> button? >>> >>> regards >> >> If your server supports ACPI and it's shutting down >> clean, it's OK. >> But if your power-button switches your system off >> immediatly, use >> shutdown -p now. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new. > http://in.answers.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 15:11:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334FB16A407 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steteorg2@mailserver8.nebula.fi) Received: from mailserver8.nebula.fi (mailserver8.nebula.fi [217.30.180.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DB043D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:11:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steteorg2@mailserver8.nebula.fi) Received: from mailserver8.nebula.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailserver8.nebula.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k47FBkjo005700 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:11:46 +0300 Received: (from steteorg2@localhost) by mailserver8.nebula.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k47FBkla005699; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:11:46 +0300 Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:11:46 +0300 Message-Id: <200605071511.k47FBkla005699@mailserver8.nebula.fi> To: questions@freebsd.org References: <200605071511.k47FBel0005671@mailserver8.nebula.fi> In-Reply-To: <200605071511.k47FBel0005671@mailserver8.nebula.fi> X-Loop: meri.kulmala@stete.org Precedence: junk From: meri.kulmala@stete.org Cc: Subject: Re: corrected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 15:11:50 -0000 Hei, Olen siirtynyt muihin tehtäviin enkä enää näin ollen tavoitettavissa STETEn toimistolta. Jos viestisi koskee STETEn työtä, niin ota yhteyttä osoitteeseen: stete@stete.org. Henkilökohtaisesti minulle tarkoitetut viestit voi lähettää jatkossa osoitteeseen: meri.kulmala@kolumbus.fi. Kiitos yhteistyöstä ja hyvää jatkoa! I have started with other duties and not working anymore at STETE. If you have something concerning STETE and its activities, please contact: stete@stete.org. For personal correspondence, please use the address: meri.kulmala@kolumbus.fi. Thank you for co-operation! I wsih you success in the future! Parhain terveisin, Best regards, Meri Kulmala From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 15:41:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F43D16A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0128943D5D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:41:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from hera.int.dfwlp.com (hera.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47FfSSq079422 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 10:41:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 10:41:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <445DC132.7060405@greenmeadow.ca> In-Reply-To: <445DC132.7060405@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605071041.28391.jhorne@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: ULE Scheduler and overall performance on 6.x - Wow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 15:41:34 -0000 i remember when i first started using freebsd about 2 months ago, the first kernel i built, i did the ULE (at some articles recommendataion). but, ive not done it since. i guess i have been noticing a bit of lag on my system (amd 1800mhz 512rdram, u160 scsi raid0), but nothing unacceptable. however, since i didnt have a problem with my first kernel that i did, and your positive response, i decided to go ahead and change out the specified scheduler in my kernconf, and let 'er rip. is your system a desktop? were your prevously running the same desktop configuration on the same box, with the 4BSD? is the ULE scheduler suited for a server setup as well (my server is also SMP), or is this something that should be kept to a desktop? thanks, jonathan horne On Sunday 07 May 2006 04:43, Duane Whitty wrote: > Hi, > > I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28). > when I last built 6-STABLE > > Anyhow it seems great. I'm running a 2.4GHz Celeron with > 512MB RAM and two 40GB, PATA disks. Right now I'm running > both a GNOME and a KDE session, I've got Thunderbird and > Evolution open, Firefox is running and running well, and I'm > updating the my local copy of the FreeBSD repository. Oh yeah, > I'm also running a DNS server, a Sendmail server, and SAMBA > I can't believe how responsive everything is on this low-end machine > I'm running. Wow! (And this with debugging turned on but no WITNESS > or INVARIANTS turned on) > > Well time to rebuild the sources :) > > dwpc@ /home/duane>uname -a > FreeBSD dwpc.dwlabs.ca 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #0: Fri Apr 28 18:41:15 ADT > 2006 duane@dwpc.dwlabs.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DWPC-KERNEL i386 > > Best Regards, > > Duane Whitty From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 15:59:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD9F16A50D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sub02@freeode.co.uk) Received: from mail.freeode.co.uk (213-162-123-162.johnmu221.adsl.metronet.co.uk [213.162.123.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FD343D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sub02@freeode.co.uk) Received: from lexx.freeode.co.uk (lexx.freeode.co.uk [10.10.10.2]) by mail.freeode.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k47FxdN7006824 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:59:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from sub02@freeode.co.uk) From: John Murphy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:59:39 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 20 Ierrs/sec on ath0 (no traffic) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sub02@freeode.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 15:59:46 -0000 I've recently installed a D-Link DWL-G520 PCI card in my Soekris Net4801. It's configured to use ipsec and seems to work very well except 'Daily' reports an ever increasing number of 'Ierrs' far in excess of 'Ipkts' and 'Opkts'. Without any traffic on the card the counter seems to increment by about 20/sec. I also notice the two LEDs on the card are flashing at about 0.5 c/s. It's my first experience of wireless so I have nothing to compare it with. Should I be worried? Is this common for wireless cards? > grep ath /etc/rc.conf ifconfig_ath0="inet 10.10.20.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 channel 7 ssid skew_wifi mode 11b mediaopt hostap" > ifconfig ath0 ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::211:95ff:fe91:8cdf%ath0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 10.10.20.1 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 10.10.20.3 ether 00:11:95:91:8c:df media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11b status: associated ssid skew_wifi channel 7 bssid 00:11:95:91:8c:df authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 0 protmode CTS dtimperiod 1 bintval 100 > netstat -i -I ath0 Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll ath0 1500 00:11:95:91:8c:df 0 1685321 2 0 0 ath0 1500 fe80:4::211:9 fe80:4::211:95ff: 0 - 4 - - ath0 1500 10.10.20/30 10.10.20.1 0 - 0 - - 10 seconds later: > netstat -i -I ath0 Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll ath0 1500 00:11:95:91:8c:df 0 1685515 2 0 0 ath0 1500 fe80:4::211:9 fe80:4::211:95ff: 0 - 4 - - ath0 1500 10.10.20/30 10.10.20.1 0 - 0 - - -- John. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:32:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2A316A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from genoa.webtent.org (static-70-110-70-42.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [70.110.70.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8999043D69 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:32:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from columbus.webtent.org (columbus.webtent.org [192.168.1.25]) by genoa.webtent.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563ED8A02A for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:32:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 12:32:30 -0400 Message-Id: <1147019550.24620.23.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ibsh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:32:34 -0000 Anyone using ibsh shell for locking users in to their home directory? I just found out about this googling and installed the port on my FreeBSD 6.0 box, but can't seem to get it working.... files# grep ibsh /etc/shells /usr/local/bin/ibsh files# grep webtent /etc/passwd webtent:*:1002:1000:WebTent Networking, Inc.:/home/webtent:/usr/local/bin/ibsh robert@columbus:~> ssh webtent@192.168.1.7 Password: webtent@files$ cd .. webtent@files$ pwd /home webtent@files$ What am I missing? I can't find any docs or manual on the system... -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:34:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AE116A4D3 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6107C43D67 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 27262 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 02:34:16 +1000 Received: from 124-168-22-164.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (124.168.22.164) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 8 May 2006 02:34:16 +1000 Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 02:34:13 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: eoghan Message-ID: <20060508023413.29dfed31@localhost> In-Reply-To: <445DFC06.2080506@redry.net> References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507213639.662d0332@localhost> <445DF920.6090206@redry.net> <20060507135024.98615B822@shodan.nognu.de> <445DFC06.2080506@redry.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , eoghan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:34:19 -0000 On Sun, 07 May 2006 14:54:14 +0100 eoghan wrote: > I actually got it from /usr/X11R6/bin/sylpheed-claws yup . I set my launcher for sylpheed to actually do nice sylpheed-claws, as it sometimes spin-locks - this way it doesn't hog more than needed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:35:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF0A16A475 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E2DB43D60 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:35:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 49524 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2006 16:35:10 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 7 May 2006 16:35:10 -0000 Message-ID: <445E21BD.3090001@pobox.sk> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 18:35:09 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <62b856460604191108s63b57737oa9a65733a183cac6@mail.gmail.com> <20060419190529.GA18095@dan.emsphone.com> <20060420035256.GA28208@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20060420035256.GA28208@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Michael Grant Subject: Re: top for tcpdump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:35:19 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 20), Low Kian Seong said: >> Hmmm the port for trafshow seems unable to fetch the tgz file ? >> >> Probably need to ammend to point it here : >> >> http://www.mirrors.wiretapped.net/security/network-monitoring/trafshow/ ? > > I was able to download it just fine: > > (dan@dan) /usr/ports/net/trafshow> make fetch > => trafshow-5.2.3.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.nsk.su/pub/RinetSoftware/. > trafshow-5.2.3.tgz 100% of 139 kB 13 kBps 00m00s > > Extra mirror locations never hurt, though. > doesn't work here and now either :-( => trafshow-5.2.3.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.nsk.su/pub/RinetSoftware/. fetch: ftp://ftp.nsk.su/pub/RinetSoftware/trafshow-5.2.3.tgz: Not logged in => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/trafshow-5.2.3.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:49:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EE016A402 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars.udo@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D513A43D53 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:49:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.udo@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i24so838473wra for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 09:49:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Val0qN1VBAsC5Cg7ECjk5SQTjePQJyfwtV9mXXKKkOvVHwXJRu03M6dYtHxEpNq+kTuD1Lim1BflYoGNBkyKODZjjW7lZ0XXR/LefPB1I7U0ivLN2hUTGmoCEILcezCnTdM6WTQ2SbkTAFBhPPHbGqqy2iw2CbzGGo/ZH9mR4+U= Received: by 10.54.60.26 with SMTP id i26mr1270355wra; Sun, 07 May 2006 09:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.106.9 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2fef08390605070949p308a94f6ndb1992e987afcbb7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:49:47 +0300 From: "Lars Udo" To: "Hunter Fuller" In-Reply-To: <352C1FEC-36FC-4A41-A133-4E827088E43A@hackmiester.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2fef08390605070219i1b7acf96paa17087a0cde7bc5@mail.gmail.com> <352C1FEC-36FC-4A41-A133-4E827088E43A@hackmiester.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wlan on lowend laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:49:50 -0000 2006/5/7, Hunter Fuller : > > > On 07 May 2006, at 9:19 AM, Lars Udo wrote: > > > i have a litlle problem with all these wires running here and there > > in my > > flat, and as i got a woman living here with me.. i cant stand her > > complaining about those ugly wires allover the house. One beautiful > > day, i > > decided to get involved with wlan. But this one linux-dude said > > that my > > p233mmx/64ram couldnt run wlan. > Lies, all lies! My P200/32mB RAM with 6.0-RELEASE acts as an AP or a > client with WEP, WPA, etc with no issues. Thanks for your opinion :) > I dont know if he ment WAP/WEP-encryption as > > he couldnt be any spesific and that got me thinking if he even knows > > anything. > > > > My setup these days is following: 1Ghz/256ddr (Desktop mahcine, > > with ssh > > Xforwarding) via 10Mbit LAN, > > and my laptop just happens to get a lot faster when i run all apps > > on that > > desktop-pc. > Good idea, does it lag at all? I'm thinking of configuring that. Yes it lags a little, but nothing compared for opera running natively on laptop. Normally, websites renders pic by pic.. but with this configuration, it all just jumps on the screen instantly after short period time of 'thinkin' which is about 1sec. I think that 100Mbit would be a great improvement. > > > My desktop is FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and laptop has NetBSD 3.0 with > > standalone > > X & few apps just to survive if > > my desktop-pc is down. I'm planning to change into FreeNX if it > > gives any > > advantage, but that would require to replace my laptop with freebsd > > as it is > > my favorite OS that has FreeNX client. > > > > Is it possible to keep up with this setup with changin all the > > wires with > > wireless-future. If WAP/WEP is the problem, couldn i just leave it > > out and > > use IPsec, or ssh instead? > If you're really having issues... then yeah. > > Or is WAP/WEP mandatory, or is it just enough if > > i set tight firewall-rules on both ends of wlan with IPsec, so no > > one could > > intrude into my system. > Depends if you live around people or in the middle of nowhere. The > latter is the case for me, so I don't worry about security. > > > > If all goes well, my next sted would be to include one windows-pc > > also.. and > > that would need firewall for local wlan-crackers but somehow i dont > > believe > > that as a minor threat :) > It'd be fine, you just need proper firewalls, anti-virus, etc. > > > > Lasse > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:54:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E6F16A436 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from genoa.webtent.org (static-70-110-70-42.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [70.110.70.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BEB43DAD for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:53:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from columbus.webtent.org (columbus.webtent.org [192.168.1.25]) by genoa.webtent.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239328A02A for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:53:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <1147019550.24620.23.camel@columbus.webtent.org> References: <1147019550.24620.23.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 12:53:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1147020785.24620.31.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ibsh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:54:18 -0000 On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 12:32 -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > Anyone using ibsh shell for locking users in to their home directory? I > just found out about this googling and installed the port on my FreeBSD > 6.0 box, but can't seem to get it working.... > Sorry for posting to quickly, I found that merely editing the /etc/passwd file to change the shell did not get it done. I have ibsh shell working now, but something peculiar happening. I can login from my Linux box using ssh and all is as expected, but if I use the WinSCP program, commonly used by our staff, it does not believe there is an SFTP server running. Of course, logging in using WinSCP with a user of a different shell works perfectly. Here is ibsh commands I am allowing and the log from WinSCP... files# cat globals.cmds # Add any commands the user may execute. Even shell commands. # You have to allow logout and/or exit, so the user can logout! # cd and pwd should also be allowed. Note: other shell builtin # commands are not yet implemented! cd ls pwd logout exit . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 WinSCP Version 3.7.6 (Build 306) (OS 5.2.3790 Service Pack 1) . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 Login time: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:48:40 PM . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 Session name: webtent@192.168.1.7 . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 Host name: 192.168.1.7 (Port: 22) . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 User name: webtent (Password: Yes, Key file: No) . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Transfer Protocol: SFTP (SCP) . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 SSH protocol version: 2; Compression: No . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Agent forwarding: No; TIS/CryptoCard: No; KI: Yes; GSSAPI: No . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Ciphers: aes,blowfish,3des,WARN,des; Ssh2DES: No . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Ping type: -, Ping interval: 30 sec; Timeout: 15 sec . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 SSH Bugs: -,-,-,-,-,-,-,- . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 SFTP Bugs: -,-,- . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Proxy: none . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Return code variable: Autodetect; Lookup user groups: Yes . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Shell: default, EOL: 0 . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Local directory: default, Remote directory: home, Update: No, Cache: Yes . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Cache directory changes: Yes, Permanent: Yes . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Clear aliases: Yes, Unset nat.vars: Yes, Resolve symlinks: Yes . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Alias LS: No, Ign LS warn: Yes, Scp1 Comp: No . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.771 Looking up host "192.168.1.7" . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.781 Connecting to 192.168.1.7 port 22 . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.831 Server version: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.2p1 FreeBSD-20050903 . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.851 We claim version: SSH-2.0-WinSCP_release_3.7.6 . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.861 Using SSH protocol version 2 . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.881 Doing Diffie-Hellman group exchange . 2006-05-07 12:48:41.001 Doing Diffie-Hellman key exchange . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.273 Host key fingerprint is: . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.293 ssh-dss 2048 0a:59:6c:0f:b9:18:2b:68:1b:e0:5d:3b:d6:5a:e0:65 . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.313 Initialised AES-256 client->server encryption . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.333 Initialised HMAC-SHA1 client->server MAC algorithm . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.353 Initialised AES-256 server->client encryption . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.373 Initialised HMAC-SHA1 server->client MAC algorithm ! 2006-05-07 12:48:42.413 Using username "webtent". ! 2006-05-07 12:48:42.523 Using keyboard-interactive authentication. . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.543 Password: prompt from server . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.563 Responding with stored password. . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.603 Access granted . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.623 Opened channel for session . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.653 Started a shell/command . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.673 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.693 Using SFTP protocol. . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.724 Doing startup conversation with host. > 2006-05-07 12:48:42.744 Type: SSH_FXP_INIT, Size: 5, Number: -1 . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.774 Server sent command exit status 0 . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.794 All channels closed. Disconnecting . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.824 Server closed network connection * 2006-05-07 12:48:42.854 (ESshFatal) Cannot initialize SFTP protocol. Is the host running a SFTP server? * 2006-05-07 12:48:42.854 Connection has been unexpectedly closed. Server sent command exit status 0. -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:57:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFD716A41B for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9135243D6D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:57:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 94585 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2006 16:57:16 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 7 May 2006 16:57:16 -0000 Message-ID: <445E26EC.4030708@pobox.sk> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 18:57:16 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Pantyukhin References: <1145613149.19574.259591981@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port building & linking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:57:20 -0000 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 4/21/06, ph rhole oper wrote: >> I need to build a port (mail/cyrus-imapd23) and add support for the >> mit-kerberos implementation to it. >> It needs to link to the -lkrb5 library.There are two libkrb5*.so in my >> system: >> the heimdal one (/usr/lib/libkrb5*.so) and the mit one >> (/usr/local/lib/libkrb5*.so). >> The configure script, searching for -lkrb5, finds /usr/lib/libkrb5.so >> first, and links to the heimdal implementation. >> Is there any way i can force it to only link against >> /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so?I need the mit implementation. >> >> >> simon. >> >> -- >> http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Are you talking about cyrus-imapd or cyrus-sasl? cyrus-sasl > has some options in its Makefile, like KRB5_HOME. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > speaking of cyrus, i've recently spotted new entry in my passwd and have been wondering where/when did it get there.. ?? of course i don't know of installing anything called cyrus.. m. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 17:06:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1387A16A402 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F05F43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fcmhr-0003JE-Hc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 19:06:07 +0200 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.10.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 19:06:07 +0200 Received: from martinkov by r5k20.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 19:06:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:06:00 +0200 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <50508.81.174.174.115.1145620302.squirrel@maxproxy7.uk2net.com> <1159.80.47.218.204.1145692979.squirrel@maxproxy3.uk2net.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5k20.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 In-Reply-To: <1159.80.47.218.204.1145692979.squirrel@maxproxy3.uk2net.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Remote screen control software - recommendations please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 17:06:12 -0000 Graham Bentley wrote: > Thanks for all the suggestions on this. Perhaps I should have worded > my question better (well, maybe not on a FreeBSD list ;) > > I am looking to control Windogs (yuk!) Desktops remotely (and as > secure as possible - lol !) > > Thanks > i also used tightvnc and run it through an ssh tunnel from fbsd to win2k. if you play with parameters it's quite responsive imho. other than that, i would go for nx, but you need a unix/linux proxy sever as you can't connect directly to windows. check their website for explanation and more info or use google to find more articles.. martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 17:09:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB07616A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA3743D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:09:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from hera.int.dfwlp.com (hera.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47H9FVo085655 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:09:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:09:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605071209.15390.jhorne@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: memory usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 17:09:18 -0000 i have a server that has 2GB ram, recently upgraded from 1GB ram. it runs apache2.0 with php5, sendmail with spamass-milter, dovecot, mysql5.0, cacti, and a couple other small things (like snmp, my bx irc shell, etc). when ever i look at the memory usage (via phpsysinfo, or cacti graphs), its nearly always showing less than 100mb of ram available. top shows several perls (probably spamassassin), 8 or so httpds (typical), but that would probably only account for (a liberal guess) 500-600 mb of ram. is there a good way to find out where this bottomless ram funnel leads to? or, should this behavior just be considered typical? thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 17:19:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FAA16A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC2F43D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:19:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from hera.int.dfwlp.com (hera.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47HJgZQ085805 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:19:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:19:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605071209.15390.jhorne@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200605071209.15390.jhorne@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605071219.41408.jhorne@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: memory usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 17:19:44 -0000 On Sunday 07 May 2006 12:09, Jonathan Horne wrote: > i have a server that has 2GB ram, recently upgraded from 1GB ram. it runs > apache2.0 with php5, sendmail with spamass-milter, dovecot, mysql5.0, > cacti, and a couple other small things (like snmp, my bx irc shell, etc). > > when ever i look at the memory usage (via phpsysinfo, or cacti graphs), its > nearly always showing less than 100mb of ram available. top shows several > perls (probably spamassassin), 8 or so httpds (typical), but that would > probably only account for (a liberal guess) 500-600 mb of ram. > > is there a good way to find out where this bottomless ram funnel leads to? > or, should this behavior just be considered typical? > > thanks, > jonathan update... i just upgraded to the new phpsysinfo rc2, and it shows more detailed information about what the memory usage is doing. it shows that 1.57GB is being used by buffers. what is the significance of 1.57GB of memory being used by 'buffers'? thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 17:32:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E4C16A41F for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:32:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60020.mail.yahoo.com (web60020.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0D7543D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:32:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 69400 invoked by uid 60001); 7 May 2006 17:32:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wD47rxhmmlYJOT9NUCRSGE8TxS4B9CDGASixQjZDNA0RXMUIREf7nTTo10KJUa/q2P1I/GrJxIj6MDIXaNQiqMuzdb2/EqPzr/nOIYZ3M7Vg4srLpbJRzN45pRWafULCIymxk9J80/JsC2o9o/c+oJ1tPkuNAd17bzocoS9FgY4= ; Message-ID: <20060507173220.69398.qmail@web60020.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.81.189.3] by web60020.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 13:32:20 EDT Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:32:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: ssh-copy-id? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 17:32:22 -0000 Some documentation I have refers to the program ssh-copy-id to faciliate the copying of a public key to a remote host. I can't locate it on my FreeBSD 5.5 system nor on my OpenBSD 3.8 system. However, it exists on my Slackware 10.2 box. Where do I find the appropriate binary for FreeBSD? Peter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 17:49:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBBE16A403 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D548E43D53 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:49:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FcnNa-000CO8-Ld by authid for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 18:49:14 +0100 Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:49:14 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20060507174914.GA1517@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions References: <20060507173220.69398.qmail@web60020.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060507173220.69398.qmail@web60020.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: ssh-copy-id? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 17:49:17 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:32:20PM -0400, Peter wrote: > Some documentation I have refers to the program ssh-copy-id to > faciliate the copying of a public key to a remote host. I can't locate > it on my FreeBSD 5.5 system nor on my OpenBSD 3.8 system. However, it > exists on my Slackware 10.2 box. Where do I find the appropriate > binary for FreeBSD? 5 seconds on Google told me that it is a script, not a binary. That being the case, it should be a simple matter to port it from your Linux box. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXjMaixf5fBYiFmoRAoHZAJ9vKMoT/pTzTcwsSrMoN1vjT67AZQCdFG9k /QD1lXNBqwdCXxi68faaIJ0= =Ijba -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 17:54:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D7916A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE49743D6E for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:54:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from moria.endor.swagman.org ([213.113.4.148] [213.113.4.148]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20060507175427.HYNA29994.mxfep02.bredband.com@moria.endor.swagman.org>; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:54:27 +0200 Received: from rivendell (rivendell.endor.swagman.org [192.168.10.10]) by moria.endor.swagman.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 216C528; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:54:25 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <017701c671ff$4c3293a0$0a0aa8c0@endor.swagman.org> From: "Reko Turja" To: "martinko" References: <1145613149.19574.259591981@webmail.messagingengine.com> <445E26EC.4030708@pobox.sk> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:54:32 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-2"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port building & linking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 17:54:33 -0000 > speaking of cyrus, i've recently spotted new entry in my passwd and > have been wondering where/when did it get there.. ?? > of course i don't know of installing anything called cyrus.. If you have installed CMU sasl, that does add "cyrus" user as well. -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 18:07:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E01316A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:07:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0237443D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:07:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 23859 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2006 18:07:28 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 7 May 2006 18:07:28 -0000 Message-ID: <445E375F.2010200@pobox.sk> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 20:07:27 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey To: freebsd-mozilla@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: seamonkey issue -- theme switching X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 18:07:31 -0000 hello! i've just upgraded from mozilla (1.7.12) to seamonkey (1.0.1) and unfortunately run into the following issue: theme change does not last for longer than 1 restart -- i change the theme (to pinball theme ), restart seamonkey as suggested, new theme is being used but after another restart of seamonkey i'm back with the previous or original (?) seamonkey theme (modern). /note that i'm running seamonkey on freebsd 6.1-rc, after just reinstalling all my ports from scratch but keeping my old mozilla profile./ any thoughts or suggestions pls ?? cheers, martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 18:14:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3587D16A402 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:14:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 475DF43D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:14:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 88014 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2006 18:14:48 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 7 May 2006 18:14:48 -0000 Message-ID: <445E3917.2000004@pobox.sk> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 20:14:47 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Reko Turja X-Priority: 4 (Low) References: <1145613149.19574.259591981@webmail.messagingengine.com> <445E26EC.4030708@pobox.sk> <017701c671ff$4c3293a0$0a0aa8c0@endor.swagman.org> In-Reply-To: <017701c671ff$4c3293a0$0a0aa8c0@endor.swagman.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port building & linking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 18:14:50 -0000 Reko Turja wrote: >> speaking of cyrus, i've recently spotted new entry in my passwd and >> have been wondering where/when did it get there.. ?? >> of course i don't know of installing anything called cyrus.. > > > If you have installed CMU sasl, that does add "cyrus" user as well. > > -Reko > > > > > i'm not aware of it. it might have been installed as a dependency, though, i guess. cheers, m. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 18:16:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947CE16A415 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0B643D7D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F252A290C38 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:15:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16829-06 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:15:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613B9290C39 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:15:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 090A24A691; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:15:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084A648193 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:15:49 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:15:48 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060507151413.J36981@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Next VNC related question ... recording X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 18:16:01 -0000 What are ppl using for this? I'm trying vnc2swf, but wonder if there is something that records to a better (ie. non windows) format that works well under FreeBSD? Thx ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 19:10:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3284316A475 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB43443D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:10:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from masai (morr0610.gti.net [208.216.122.10]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id A5E2B35C10 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:06:03 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert H. Perry" To: Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:16:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZyCjK/eSX5+QZfQw+lz04Wj/DKZQ== Message-Id: <20060507190603.A5E2B35C10@apollo.gti.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Panic: vrele: negative ref cnt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:11:01 -0000 I received a panic message (see Subject) yesterday following a GNOME upgrade. The upgrade was successful but I encountered subsequent problems trying to access Firefox websites and my mail site in Thunderbird. I noticed a Plugin error message in Firefox and prepared to paste it into a message to the mailing list but was unable to get a connection and eventually lost it. I reset my modem several times then decided to reboot. First, I re-enabled my firewall then entered shutdown -r now. Next I received the panic message and a repeat of the following: READ_DMA ad0:Timeout - Read_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA = 28162271 READ_DMA ad0: FAILURE -READ_DMA status=51 error = 40 LBA =28162271 Unfortunately, this may not have been exactly how the message read. I was sort of in a panic state myself. Another message indicated there was no request/requirement to dump. I run FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE. Your advice is appreciated. Thnx, Bob Perry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 19:14:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041FB16A40D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4C5C43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:13:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 56201 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2006 19:13:57 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 7 May 2006 19:13:57 -0000 Message-ID: <445E46F4.1010808@pobox.sk> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 21:13:56 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Reko Turja X-Priority: 4 (Low) References: <1145613149.19574.259591981@webmail.messagingengine.com> <445E26EC.4030708@pobox.sk> <017701c671ff$4c3293a0$0a0aa8c0@endor.swagman.org> <445E3917.2000004@pobox.sk> In-Reply-To: <445E3917.2000004@pobox.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port building & linking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:14:00 -0000 martinko wrote: > Reko Turja wrote: >>> speaking of cyrus, i've recently spotted new entry in my passwd and >>> have been wondering where/when did it get there.. ?? >>> of course i don't know of installing anything called cyrus.. >> >> >> If you have installed CMU sasl, that does add "cyrus" user as well. >> >> -Reko >> >> >> >> >> > > i'm not aware of it. it might have been installed as a dependency, > though, i guess. > > cheers, > > m. > aahh.. mail-notification is the culprit ;-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 19:18:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D1216A425 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9D843D6D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:18:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A600C1A3C1B; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0ECB85214D; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:18:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:18:16 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Duane Whitty Message-ID: <20060507191816.GA1976@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <445DC132.7060405@greenmeadow.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445DC132.7060405@greenmeadow.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE Scheduler and overall performance on 6.x - Wow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:18:23 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 06:43:14AM -0300, Duane Whitty wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28). > when I last built 6-STABLE >=20 > Anyhow it seems great. I'm running a 2.4GHz Celeron with > 512MB RAM and two 40GB, PATA disks. Right now I'm running > both a GNOME and a KDE session, I've got Thunderbird and > Evolution open, Firefox is running and running well, and I'm > updating the my local copy of the FreeBSD repository. Oh yeah, > I'm also running a DNS server, a Sendmail server, and SAMBA > I can't believe how responsive everything is on this low-end machine > I'm running. Wow! (And this with debugging turned on but no WITNESS > or INVARIANTS turned on) FYI, in my testing ULE is faster under light workloads but quite a lot slower under heavy loads. It's not recommended, but YMMV. Kris --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXkf4Wry0BWjoQKURAum3AKDvqqMP340HWmVwZGnHkij7Hsu+ZwCdHADi iQY3frYJSt2kncWlONOrwDI= =phkO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 19:19:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2462E16A478 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1C443D7D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:19:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F261A3C1B; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CCDCD51695; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:19:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:19:35 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Robert H. Perry" Message-ID: <20060507191935.GB1976@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060507190603.A5E2B35C10@apollo.gti.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060507190603.A5E2B35C10@apollo.gti.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic: vrele: negative ref cnt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:19:49 -0000 --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:16:46PM -0400, Robert H. Perry wrote: > I received a panic message (see Subject) yesterday following a GNOME > upgrade. The upgrade was successful but I encountered subsequent problems > trying to access Firefox websites and my mail site in Thunderbird. I > noticed a Plugin error message in Firefox and prepared to paste it into a > message to the mailing list but was unable to get a connection and > eventually lost it. >=20 > I reset my modem several times then decided to reboot. First, I re-enabl= ed > my firewall then entered shutdown -r now. Next I received the panic mess= age > and a repeat of the following: >=20 > READ_DMA ad0:Timeout - Read_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA =3D 28162271 > READ_DMA ad0: FAILURE -READ_DMA status=3D51 error =3D= 40 > LBA =3D28162271 Your hard drive is dying. This may have caused the panic as a secondary effect after the read failed. Kris --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXkhHWry0BWjoQKURAr5RAKDX3qzaIm/MdeBdl/ZT2lAciEg5nACffMfh 7DtuZ1Gq1U5jsGZh+K2zh+o= =Owah -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 19:51:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC9416A408 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 879FF43D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:51:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 82404 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2006 19:51:42 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 7 May 2006 19:51:41 -0000 Message-ID: <445E4FCC.10605@pobox.sk> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 21:51:40 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: X11 6.9 issue -- options "AGPMode" and "AGPFastWrite" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:51:44 -0000 hello list! i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and run into the following issue: after starting x11 for the first time the screen went black and console was inaccessible (i had to reboot). when i tried the generated xorg.conf (`Xorg -configure`) it worked. so i started comparing my old config file with the new one and found out that the following two options i had been using are the root of the problem: Option "AGPMode" "4" # ++ 2005-02-11 mato Option "AGPFastWrite" # ++ 2005-02-11 mato they just cannot be set both at the same time now. and i wonder why. and also i wonder which one to comment out and which one to keep (if any at all). note that i'm running freebsd 6.1-rc, after just reinstalling all my ports from scratch. for details on my graphics card pls see below. any thoughts or suggestions pls ?? cheers, martin -- $ grep -i radeon /var/log/Xorg.0.log (--) PCI:*(1:0:0) ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10] rev 0, Mem @ 0xd0000000/27, 0xff8f0000/16, I/O @ 0xc800/8, BIOS @ 0xff8c0000/17 (II) RADEON: Driver for ATI Radeon chipsets: ATI Radeon QD (AGP), ATI Radeon QE (AGP), ATI Radeon QF (AGP), ATI Radeon QG (AGP), ATI Radeon VE/7000 QY (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon VE/7000 QZ (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon Mobility M7 LW (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility M6 LY (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility M6 LZ (AGP), ATI Radeon IGP320 (A3) 4136, ATI Radeon IGP320M (U1) 4336, ATI Radeon IGP330/340/350 (A4) 4137, ATI Radeon IGP330M/340M/350M (U2) 4337, ATI Radeon 7000 IGP (A4+) 4237, ATI Radeon Mobility 7000 IGP 4437, ATI FireGL 8700/8800 QH (AGP), ATI Radeon 8500 QL (AGP), ATI Radeon 9100 QM (AGP), ATI Radeon 8500 AIW BB (AGP), ATI Radeon 8500 AIW BC (AGP), ATI Radeon 7500 QW (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon 7500 QX (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon 9000/PRO If (AGP/PCI), ATI Radeon 9000 Ig (AGP/PCI), ATI FireGL Mobility 9000 (M9) Ld (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 (M9) Lf (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 (M9) Lg (AGP), ATI Radeon 9100 IGP (A5) 5834, ATI Radeon Mobility 9100 IGP (U3) 5835, ATI Radeon 9100 PRO IGP 7834, ATI Radeon Mobility 9200 IGP 7835, ATI Radeon 9200PRO 5960 (AGP), ATI Radeon 9200 5961 (AGP), ATI Radeon 9200 5962 (AGP), ATI Radeon 9200SE 5964 (AGP), ATI FireMV 2200 (PCI), ATI Radeon Mobility 9200 (M9+) 5C61 (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9200 (M9+) 5C63 (AGP), ATI Radeon 9500 AD (AGP), ATI Radeon 9500 AE (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600TX AF (AGP), ATI FireGL Z1 AG (AGP), ATI Radeon 9700 Pro ND (AGP), ATI Radeon 9700/9500Pro NE (AGP), ATI Radeon 9700 NF (AGP), ATI FireGL X1 NG (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600 AP (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600SE AQ (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600XT AR (AGP), ATI Radeon 9600 AS (AGP), ATI FireGL T2 AT (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 (M10) NQ (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 (M11) NR (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 (M10) NS (AGP), ATI FireGL Mobility T2e (M11) NV (AGP), ATI Radeon 9650, ATI Radeon 9800SE AH (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800 AI (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800 AJ (AGP), ATI FireGL X2 AK (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800PRO NH (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800 NI (AGP), ATI FireGL X2 NK (AGP), ATI Radeon 9800XT NJ (AGP), ATI Radeon X600 (RV380) 3E50 (PCIE), ATI Radeon Mobility X600 (M24) 3150 (PCIE), ATI FireGL M24 GL 3154 (PCIE), ATI Radeon X300 (RV370) 5B60 (PCIE), ATI Radeon X600 (RV370) 5B62 (PCIE), ATI Radeon Mobility M300 (M22) 5460 (PCIE), ATI FireGL M22 GL 5464 (PCIE), ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 5A41 (PCIE), ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M 5A42 (PCIE), ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 5A61 (PCIE), ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M 5A62 (PCIE), ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 5954 (PCIE), ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 (PCIE), ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 5974 (PCIE), ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M 5975 (PCIE), ATI FireGL V5000 (RV410) (PCIE), ATI Mobility Radeon X700 (M26) (PCIE), ATI Mobility Radeon X700 (M26) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X700 PRO (RV410) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X700 XT (RV410) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X700 (RV410) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X700 SE (RV410) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X700 SE (RV410) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X800 (R420) JH (AGP), ATI Radeon X800PRO (R420) JI (AGP), ATI Radeon X800SE (R420) JJ (AGP), ATI Radeon X800 (R420) JK (AGP), ATI Radeon X800 (R420) JL (AGP), ATI FireGL X3 (R420) JM (AGP), ATI Radeon Mobility 9800 (M18) JN (AGP), ATI Radeon X800XT (R420) JP (AGP), ATI Radeon X800 SE (R420) (AGP), ATI Radeon X800 (R423) UH (PCIE), ATI Radeon X800PRO (R423) UI (PCIE), ATI Radeon X800LE (R423) UJ (PCIE), ATI Radeon X800SE (R423) UK (PCIE), ATI Radeon X800XT (R423) 5D57 (PCIE), ATI FireGL V7100 (R423) (PCIE), ATI Mobility Radeon X800 (M28) (PCIE), ATI Mobility Radeon X800 XT (M28) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X800 (R430) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X800 XL (R430) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X800 SE (R430) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X800 XTP (R430) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X850 5D4C (PCIE), ATI Radeon FireGL (R480) GL 5D50 (PCIE), ATI Radeon X850 SE (R480) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X850 PRO (R480) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X850 XT (R480) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X850 XT PE (R480) (PCIE), ATI Radeon X850 PRO (R480) (AGP), ATI Radeon X850 SE (R480) (AGP), ATI Radeon X850 XT (R480) (AGP), ATI Radeon X850 XT PE (R480) (AGP) (--) Chipset ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP (AGP) found (II) Loading sub module "radeon" (II) LoadModule: "radeon" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so (II) Module radeon: vendor="X.Org Foundation" (II) RADEON(0): MMIO registers at 0xff8f0000 (==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xff8f0000,0x80000) was already clear (II) RADEON(0): PCI bus 1 card 0 func 0 (**) RADEON(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32 (II) RADEON(0): Pixel depth = 24 bits stored in 4 bytes (32 bpp pixmaps) (==) RADEON(0): Default visual is TrueColor (**) RADEON(0): Option "AGPMode" "4" (**) RADEON(0): Option "EnablePageFlip" (**) RADEON(0): Option "DynamicClocks" (II) RADEON(0): vgaHWGetIOBase: hwp->IOBase is 0x03d0, hwp->PIOOffset is 0x0000 (==) RADEON(0): RGB weight 888 (II) RADEON(0): Using 8 bits per RGB (8 bit DAC) (II) RADEON(0): initializing int10 (==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xa0000,0x20000) was already clear (==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xc0000,0x40000) was already clear (II) RADEON(0): Primary V_BIOS segment is: 0xc000 (==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0x0,0x1000) was already clear (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon Mobility 9600/9700 (M10/M11) NP (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x4e50) (--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xd0000000 (--) RADEON(0): BIOS at 0xff8c0000 (--) RADEON(0): VideoRAM: 65536 kByte (128 bit DDR SDRAM) (II) RADEON(0): AGP card detected (II) RADEON(0): Color tiling disabled (II) RADEON(0): I2C bus "DDC" initialized. (II) RADEON(0): Legacy BIOS detected (II) RADEON(0): LVDS port is not in connector table, added in. (II) RADEON(0): Connector0: DDCType-0, DACType-1, TMDSType--1, ConnectorType-1 (II) RADEON(0): Connector1: DDCType-3, DACType-0, TMDSType--1, ConnectorType-2 (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. (II) RADEON(0): I2C device "DDC:ddc2" removed. (II) RADEON(0): DDC Type: 3, Detected Type: 0 (II) RADEON(0): (II) RADEON(0): Primary: (II) RADEON(0): Secondary: (II) RADEON(0): PLL parameters: rf=2700 rd=6 min=20000 max=40000; xclk=21000 (WW) RADEON(0): Failed to detect secondary monitor, MergedFB/Clone mode disabled (==) RADEON(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0) (II) RADEON(0): Validating modes on Primary head --------- (II) RADEON(0): Panel ID string: SEC (II) RADEON(0): Panel Size from BIOS: 1680x1050 (II) RADEON(0): BIOS provided dividers will be used. (II) RADEON(0): Total number of valid DDC mode(s) found: 0 (II) RADEON(0): No valid mode specified, force to native mode (II) RADEON(0): Total number of valid FP mode(s) found: 1 (--) RADEON(0): Virtual size is 1680x1050 (pitch 1680) (**) RADEON(0): *Mode "1680x1050": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1680x1050" 121.00 1680 1704 1792 1872 1050 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "640x350": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x350" 121.00 640 1704 1792 1872 350 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "640x400": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x400" 121.00 640 1704 1792 1872 400 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "720x400": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "720x400" 121.00 720 1704 1792 1872 400 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "640x480": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x480" 121.00 640 1704 1792 1872 480 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "800x600": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "800x600" 121.00 800 1704 1792 1872 600 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "1024x768": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1024x768" 121.00 1024 1704 1792 1872 768 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "1152x864": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1152x864" 121.00 1152 1704 1792 1872 864 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "1280x960": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1280x960" 121.00 1280 1704 1792 1872 960 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "1280x1024": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1280x1024" 121.00 1280 1704 1792 1872 1024 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "832x624": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "832x624" 121.00 832 1704 1792 1872 624 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "1152x768": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1152x768" 121.00 1152 1704 1792 1872 768 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "1400x1050": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1400x1050" 121.00 1400 1704 1792 1872 1050 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Default mode "1600x1024": 121.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 64.6 kHz, 60.7 Hz (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1600x1024" 121.00 1600 1704 1792 1872 1024 1051 1054 1065 (**) RADEON(0): Display dimensions: (330, 206) mm (**) RADEON(0): DPI set to (129, 129) (==) RADEON(0): Using XAA acceleration architecture (**) RADEON(0): AGP 4x mode is configured (II) RADEON(0): AGP Fast Write disabled by default (II) RADEON(0): Page flipping enabled (II) RADEON(0): Will try to use DMA for Xv image transfers (II) RADEON(0): No MM_TABLE found - assuming CARD is not TV-in capable. (==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0x0,0x1000) was already clear (!!) RADEON(0): For information on using the multimedia capabilities (==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xff8f0000,0x80000) was already clear (==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xd0000000,0x4000000) was already set (==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xa0000,0x10000) was already clear (II) RADEON(0): Dynamic Clock Scaling Enabled (II) RADEON(0): BIOS HotKeys Disabled (WW) RADEON(0): Enabling DRM support *** Direct rendering support is highly experimental for Radeon 9500 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] DRM interface version 1.2 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] created "radeon" driver at busid "pci:0000:01:00.0" (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xc4c14000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xc4c14000 to 0x2880b000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xd0000000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel (II) RADEON(0): [agp] Mode 0x1f000207 [AGP 0x0000/0x0000; Card 0x1002/0x4e50] (II) RADEON(0): [agp] 8192 kB allocated with handle 0xc37920c0 (II) RADEON(0): [agp] ring handle = 0xe0000000 (II) RADEON(0): [agp] Ring mapped at 0x2c905000 (II) RADEON(0): [agp] ring read ptr handle = 0xe0101000 (II) RADEON(0): [agp] Ring read ptr mapped at 0x2880d000 (II) RADEON(0): [agp] vertex/indirect buffers handle = 0xe0102000 (II) RADEON(0): [agp] Vertex/indirect buffers mapped at 0x2ca06000 (II) RADEON(0): [agp] GART texture map handle = 0xe0302000 (II) RADEON(0): [agp] GART Texture map mapped at 0x2cc06000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] register handle = 0xff8f0000 (II) RADEON(0): [dri] Visual configs initialized (II) RADEON(0): Depth moves disabled by default (II) RADEON(0): CP in BM mode (II) RADEON(0): Using 8 MB GART aperture (II) RADEON(0): Using 1 MB for the ring buffer (II) RADEON(0): Using 2 MB for vertex/indirect buffers (II) RADEON(0): Using 5 MB for GART textures (II) RADEON(0): Memory manager initialized to (0,0) (1680,8191) (II) RADEON(0): Reserved area from (0,1050) to (1680,1052) (II) RADEON(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1680 x 7139 (II) RADEON(0): Will use back buffer at offset 0xe70000 (II) RADEON(0): Will use depth buffer at offset 0x152b000 (II) RADEON(0): Will use 36864 kb for textures at offset 0x1c00000 (II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration unsupported on Radeon 9500/9700 and newer. (II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration disabled (II) RADEON(0): Using XFree86 Acceleration Architecture (XAA) (II) RADEON(0): Acceleration enabled (**) RADEON(0): Option "BackingStore" (**) RADEON(0): Backing store enabled (==) RADEON(0): Silken mouse enabled (II) RADEON(0): Using hardware cursor (scanline 1052) (II) RADEON(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1680 x 7136 (**) RADEON(0): DPMS enabled (II) RADEON(0): No video input capabilities detected and no information is provided - disabling multimedia i2c (II) RADEON(0): no multimedia table present, disabling Rage Theatre. (II) RADEON(0): X context handle = 0x1 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] installed DRM signal handler (II) RADEON(0): [DRI] installation complete (II) RADEON(0): [drm] Added 32 65536 byte vertex/indirect buffers (II) RADEON(0): [drm] Mapped 32 vertex/indirect buffers (II) RADEON(0): [drm] dma control initialized, using IRQ 5 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] Initialized kernel GART heap manager, 5111808 (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering enabled From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 20:33:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B7416A408 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:33:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D68A43D4C for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:33:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-41-159.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.41.159]) by ms-smtp-01.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k47KXmmK022236 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:33:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <025b01c67213$fec66dc0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:22:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: php4 port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 20:33:54 -0000 Hello, Is there any known issues or things to watch out for when doing the latest php4 upgrade? The notes in the UPDATING file indicated a change in the status of the .cli binary. If one has mod_php4 and the php4-extensions already installed is the upgrade a smooth one? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 20:39:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BFB16A405 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from drone3.qsi.net.nz (drone3-svc-skyt.qsi.net.nz [202.89.128.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370E143D4C for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:39:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: (qmail 12941 invoked by uid 0); 7 May 2006 20:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chen.org.nz) ([202.89.146.5]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 May 2006 20:39:52 -0000 Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 357DC5642F; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:39:52 +1200 (NZST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:39:52 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Jonathan Horne Message-ID: <20060507203952.GA29858@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <200605071209.15390.jhorne@dfwlp.com> <200605071219.41408.jhorne@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605071219.41408.jhorne@dfwlp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: memory usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 20:39:57 -0000 On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:19:41PM -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote: > i just upgraded to the new phpsysinfo rc2, and it shows more detailed > information about what the memory usage is doing. it shows that 1.57GB is > being used by buffers. what is the significance of 1.57GB of memory being > used by 'buffers'? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#TOP-FREEMEM -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 20:50:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AC616A4AC for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B2D43D70 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:50:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75019290C39 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:50:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35720-04 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:50:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D9B290C38 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:50:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0107345CB0; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:50:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001A83E7B2 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:50:45 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:50:45 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060507174906.I36981@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Printing from KDE -> Windows XP server ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 20:50:49 -0000 I think I have everything setup right, but when I try and print a test page, on the windows side, it says 'Size 64.0 KB/3.70MB' ... so its not printing, cause it hasn't receivd the whole file ... I'm running KDE 3, CUPs installed, on FreeBSD 6.x ... is there something obvious I'm overlooking, to get that test to actually print? :) thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 21:06:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB50A16A437 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 21:06:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A11643D7E for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 21:06:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from [64.114.58.100] (helo=[192.168.1.116]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FcqSc-000MoL-3x; Sun, 07 May 2006 14:06:38 -0700 Message-ID: <445E615E.2020406@ccstores.com> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 14:06:38 -0700 From: Jim Pazarena Organization: City Centre Stores Ltd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (00) Subject: named / bind on 6.1RC2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 21:06:43 -0000 something seems to have changed with named on 6.1 compared to 6.0 using defaults named cannot create the /var/run/named.pid file. after changing permissions of /var/run to 777, THEN named runs and creates a named.pid of: bind:wheel upon reading I see a "new" rc.conf variable -> named_uid I added named_uid="0" , changed /var/run back to defaults 755 , rebooted and named doesn't even attempt to run (nothing in the log file). I don't need a jail environment, therefore have named_chrootdir="" in my rc.conf can someone please advise where I am going wrong? on 6.0 it just 'works' Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 22:01:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25F816A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8EF43D55 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:01:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip03.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.15]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IYX00J7414MQ250@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 19:00:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip03.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 19:01:02 -0300 Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:00:14 -0300 From: Duane Whitty In-reply-to: <200605071041.28391.jhorne@dfwlp.com> To: Jonathan Horne Message-id: <445E6DEE.1060408@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= References: <445DC132.7060405@greenmeadow.ca> <200605071041.28391.jhorne@dfwlp.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060503) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE Scheduler and overall performance on 6.x - Wow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:01:04 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > i remember when i first started using freebsd about 2 months ago, the first > kernel i built, i did the ULE (at some articles recommendataion). but, ive > not done it since. i guess i have been noticing a bit of lag on my system > (amd 1800mhz 512rdram, u160 scsi raid0), but nothing unacceptable. > > however, since i didnt have a problem with my first kernel that i did, and > your positive response, i decided to go ahead and change out the specified > scheduler in my kernconf, and let 'er rip. > > is your system a desktop? were your prevously running the same desktop > configuration on the same box, with the 4BSD? is the ULE scheduler suited > for a server setup as well (my server is also SMP), or is this something that > should be kept to a desktop? > > thanks, > jonathan horne > > My system is a "desktop" and yes I was previously using the 4BSD scheduler. As for whether it is suited for a server environment I would say that depends. >From what I understand it is an experimental scheduler meant to bring better performance to SMP machines but that UP machines may also show some improvement. If I was using this box as a server for mission critical applications there are a whole bunch of things I am doing now that I would not be doing. Before I would use any relatively new configuration on a production server I would have to do some reliability testing and benchmarking on a test machine that I had configured to test a particular harware/application mix. I would also be reading what other people had to say and I would first choose to use something that was known to generally work and for which issues were generally know and mostly understood. Also, go where the support is. :) This is basically a test box and a learning platform. There are way too many applications loaded on this machine and they are far too varied in nature for me to single out one aspect of my configuration and say whether or not it is suitable in a server configuration. In addition I wouldn't be able to say whether ULE is suitable for a server after testing it on hardware that is definitely not suitable as a server, in my opinion. I am willing to say that for desktop use the ULE scheduler --seems-- to work great. But do keep in mind Mr. Kennaway's comments per this thread. Of course the 4BSD scheduler works great so I wouldn't switch unless I had a reason to. --Duane > On Sunday 07 May 2006 04:43, Duane Whitty wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28). >> when I last built 6-STABLE >> >> Anyhow it seems great. I'm running a 2.4GHz Celeron with >> 512MB RAM and two 40GB, PATA disks. Right now I'm running >> both a GNOME and a KDE session, I've got Thunderbird and >> Evolution open, Firefox is running and running well, and I'm >> updating the my local copy of the FreeBSD repository. Oh yeah, >> I'm also running a DNS server, a Sendmail server, and SAMBA >> I can't believe how responsive everything is on this low-end machine >> I'm running. Wow! (And this with debugging turned on but no WITNESS >> or INVARIANTS turned on) >> >> Well time to rebuild the sources :) >> >> dwpc@ /home/duane>uname -a >> FreeBSD dwpc.dwlabs.ca 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #0: Fri Apr 28 18:41:15 ADT >> 2006 duane@dwpc.dwlabs.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DWPC-KERNEL i386 >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Duane Whitty >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 22:05:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77A316A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerik@jerik.de) Received: from mail.jerik.de (srv017.dedi32.de [83.151.25.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481B343D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:05:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerik@jerik.de) Received: by mail.jerik.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D18CC6241; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:05:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:05:31 +0200 From: "J. Erik Heinz" To: martinko Message-ID: <20060507220530.GB89460@jerik.de> Mail-Followup-To: martinko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <50508.81.174.174.115.1145620302.squirrel@maxproxy7.uk2net.com> <1159.80.47.218.204.1145692979.squirrel@maxproxy3.uk2net.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote screen control software - recommendations please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:05:57 -0000 Hi, martinko words on 07.05.2006 - 19:06 (+0200 Zulu-Time): > Graham Bentley wrote: > >Thanks for all the suggestions on this. Perhaps I should have worded > >my question better (well, maybe not on a FreeBSD list ;) > > > >I am looking to control Windogs (yuk!) Desktops remotely (and as > >secure as possible - lol !) /usr/ports/net/rdesktop Cheers -- Erik -- J. Erik Heinz Keyboard-samuraing in process :: All non-mailinglist mail to this emailadress will be deleted. OpenBC: https://www.openbc.com/hp/JErik_Heinz Blog: http://jerik.blogspot.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 22:18:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CE416A403 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:18:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E008943D49 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:18:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from masai (ts5m-pool0-176.gti.net [208.216.126.176]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id 803A736244; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:14:09 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert H. Perry" To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:24:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20060507191935.GB1976@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZyCoTOyAoCopZjTleNY7EprptYwQAC/U5w Message-Id: <20060507221409.803A736244@apollo.gti.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Panic: vrele: negative ref cnt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:18:56 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@obsecurity.org] Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 3:20 PM To: Robert H. Perry Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic: vrele: negative ref cnt On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:16:46PM -0400, Robert H. Perry wrote: > I received a panic message (see Subject) yesterday following a GNOME > upgrade. The upgrade was successful but I encountered subsequent problems > trying to access Firefox websites and my mail site in Thunderbird. I > noticed a Plugin error message in Firefox and prepared to paste it into a > message to the mailing list but was unable to get a connection and > eventually lost it. > > I reset my modem several times then decided to reboot. First, I re-enabled > my firewall then entered shutdown -r now. Next I received the panic message > and a repeat of the following: > > READ_DMA ad0:Timeout - Read_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA = 28162271 > READ_DMA ad0: FAILURE -READ_DMA status=51 error = 40 > LBA =28162271 Your hard drive is dying. This may have caused the panic as a secondary effect after the read failed. Thanks for taking the time to respond. Not good news obviously, but could be worse. This is my mule machine. I was using it as a gateway, to develop some networking skills, and had installed SAMBA and was also trying to install HylaFAX . Fortunately it has a second hard drive which currently holds the /var slice. Out with the bad and in with the good. BTW, can the data on this drive be copied to the surviving drive? What commands do I need to review? My initial thoughts were to simply install 6.0 and go on from there. Any hints/suggestions are appreciated. Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 22:34:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E910416A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B05443D49 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2907B1A3C1E; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A61151695; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:34:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:34:16 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Robert H. Perry" Message-ID: <20060507223416.GA6710@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060507191935.GB1976@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060507221409.803A736244@apollo.gti.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060507221409.803A736244@apollo.gti.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: Panic: vrele: negative ref cnt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:34:18 -0000 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 06:24:52PM -0400, Robert H. Perry wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to respond. Not good news obviously, but could > be worse. This is my mule machine. I was using it as a gateway, to devel= op > some networking skills, and had installed SAMBA and was also trying to > install HylaFAX . Fortunately it has a second hard drive which currently > holds the /var slice. Out with the bad and in with the good. >=20 > BTW, can the data on this drive be copied to the surviving drive? What > commands do I need to review? My initial thoughts were to simply install > 6.0 and go on from there. Any hints/suggestions are appreciated. dump/restore or just copy over the data you need to keep with tar | tar Kris --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXnXnWry0BWjoQKURAjOYAKDuJfA/JTo7LZcoc3pOXOwzZQCz9ACg2pCr w3kDu1GdsHUCJPHLJnUcKt0= =LnkM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 22:37:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFCB16A416 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09FC43D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:37:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from [64.114.58.101] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FcrsQ-000OGn-GB; Sun, 07 May 2006 15:37:22 -0700 Message-ID: <445E76A3.3080105@ccstores.com> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 15:37:23 -0700 From: Jim Pazarena Organization: City Centre Stores Ltd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <445E615E.2020406@ccstores.com> In-Reply-To: <445E615E.2020406@ccstores.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (01) Subject: Re: named / bind on 6.1RC2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:37:23 -0000 Jim Pazarena wrote: > something seems to have changed with named on 6.1 compared to 6.0 > > using defaults named cannot create the /var/run/named.pid file. > after changing permissions of /var/run to 777, THEN named runs and > creates a named.pid of: bind:wheel > > upon reading I see a "new" rc.conf variable -> named_uid > I added named_uid="0" , changed /var/run back to defaults 755 , > rebooted and named doesn't even attempt to run (nothing in the > log file). named_uid="root" works :-( I never thought to try a "name" rather than a number > > I don't need a jail environment, therefore have > named_chrootdir="" in my rc.conf > > can someone please advise where I am going wrong? on 6.0 it just 'works' > > Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 22:41:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAD516A49A for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from mail07.powweb.com (mail07.powweb.com [66.152.97.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1224143D4C for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (24-119-225-24.cpe.cableone.net [24.119.225.24]) by mail07.powweb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A8714E0B2; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:41:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:42:56 -0500 From: "Z.C.B." To: Dominique Goncalves Message-ID: <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:41:58 -0000 On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:56:09 +0100 Dominique Goncalves wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use ldap database in /etc/nsswitch.conf but FreeBSD > hangs on boot if it needs to bind a system user present in files, my > nsswitch.conf: > group: files ldap > group_compat: nis > hosts: files dns > networks: files > passwd: files ldap > passwd_compat: nis > shells: files > > Adding ldap after FreeBSD has started, everything works ok. > > I've done some test with truss on single user mode with and without > ldap in nsswitch.conf and binding a system user present in files and > it only works if there is no ldap in nsswitch.conf > > truss with ldap in nsswitch.conf: > http://djdomics.free.fr/FreeBSD/nss-w-ldap.txt truss without ldap > in nsswitch.conf: http://djdomics.free.fr/FreeBSD/nss-wo-ldap.txt > > I use: > FreeBSD djdomics.sceen.net 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #5: Thu Jan > 12 00:18:18 CET 2006 > root@djdomics.sceen.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DJDOMICS i386 > > According to nsswitch.conf(5) > The default criteria is to return on ``success'', and continue on > any- thing else (i.e, [success=return notfound=continue > unavail=continue tryagain=continue]). > > Why FreeBSD tries to use ldap database if my user system is on > files ? Thanks for the help. Did you ever find a fix for this? I am running into the same thing myself. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 23:32:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915E216A408 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:32:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Received: from titania.auscert.org.au (gw.auscert.org.au [203.5.112.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCBA43D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:32:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (app [10.0.1.192]) by titania.auscert.org.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k47NWNuE012716 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:32:23 +1000 (EST) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (localhost.auscert.org.au [127.0.0.1]) by app.auscert.org.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k47NWN3S095373 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:32:23 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Message-Id: <200605072332.k47NWN3S095373@app.auscert.org.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org from: freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 May 2006 20:48:40 -0400." <20060505204412.BAE1.GERARD@seibercom.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 09:32:23 +1000 Subject: Re: portmanager install from packages (please) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 23:32:25 -0000 Hi Gerard, On Fri, 05 May 2006 20:48:40 -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote: > >Have you tried contacting "Michael C. Shultz" in >regards to this matter? No, I haven't - at present, the port Makefile lists: MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org I thought it best to start there. cheers, -- Joel Hatton -- Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland | WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: auscert@auscert.org.au From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 23:49:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EDB16A408 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2351043D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:49:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k47NnDp3074892; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:49:13 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 73946-03; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:49:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com ([10.0.0.4]) by wolf.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k47NnB5p074885; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:49:12 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmailmel.bytecraft.internal (Not Verified[10.0.0.24]) by svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com with MailMarshal (v5, 0, 3, 78) id ; Mon, 08 May 2006 09:49:11 +1000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:49:10 +1000 Message-ID: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F117C8BA@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Substitute command on vi Thread-Index: AcZwayELSbm+DLfmR8aadGfnbmozFABxQMIA From: "Murray Taylor" To: "Denis R." , Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Substitute command on vi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 23:49:24 -0000 This is a good vi incantation (NB The ^V is only there to allow you to put in the ^M. The ^V doesnt=20 show in the final command line, so dont panic that you cant see it) :g/^V^M/s///g ie g/^V^M/ - find a ^M (any one will do, you dont need to be at the file start) s/// - substitute nothing for the ^M just found g - do this to all other ^M's mjt -- "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." =20 Albert Einstein=20 --=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Denis R. > Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 3:40 AM > To: magalhj@yahoo.com.br > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: re: Substitute command on vi >=20 > Try > #dos2unix file_name >=20 > >>>>>>>>>> > Hi list, >=20 > I need to substitute a lot of characters ^M (ctrl+M) at the=20 > end of each line in my file. >=20 > The command :%s/^M//g insn't have success. >=20 > How can i do it ? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Aguiar --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material.=20 E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- ***This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal.*** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 23:55:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F62F16A405 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ovidiue@unixware.ro) Received: from elgreco.hmdnsgroup.com (elgreco.hmdnsgroup.com [63.247.135.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1529343D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:55:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ovidiue@unixware.ro) Received: from 86-124-116-144.iasi.cablelink.ro ([86.124.116.144]:64341 helo=[10.0.0.4]) by elgreco.hmdnsgroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1Fct6W-0006Wk-9M for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 19:56:00 -0400 Message-ID: <445E8910.9080300@unixware.ro> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 02:56:00 +0300 From: ovidiu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050420 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-From: ovidiue@unixware.ro X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - elgreco.hmdnsgroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - unixware.ro X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: md(4) rootfs mounted read only instead of rw on 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 23:55:52 -0000 Hello guys I've wrote a script that create an cd bootable iso of a small base filesystem, to boot from CD. In FreeBSD 5.4 it worked ok, but I've moved to 6.1 release and here after boot it mounts the root partition read only. I don't understand why since: i've created with mdconfig -o noreadonly, I have in fstab mounted md as rw, in rc.conf i have a variable to mount root file sistem read write... any ideea why is that happening in FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE ? (the problem was also in 6.1-RC2) best regards ovidiu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 00:17:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F65F16A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 008EC43D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:17:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 67362 invoked by uid 0); 8 May 2006 00:17:19 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 8 May 2006 00:17:19 -0000 Message-ID: <445E8E0E.9030705@pobox.sk> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 02:17:18 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: X11 6.9 issue -- option "ZAxisMapping" -- "4 5" vs "4 5 6 7" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 00:17:22 -0000 hello list! i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and run into the following issue: [note that this was first noticed in seamonkey..] if i scroll my mouse wheel too fast, i'm suddenly moving in history instead of scrolling the page. one quick finger movement is enough to trigger this. very annoying. so it seems to me that the events are interpreted as horizontal movements. i have 1-wheel mouse of the following type, though: kernel: ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/11.10, addr 2, iclass 3/1 kernel: ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. and i found out that the new option introduced in X11 6.9 broke it: Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" # ++ 2005-01-18 mato #Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" #!!! the first version (3rd line) was added manually by me long time ago, while the 2nd version (4th line) was automatically generated by new X11 with `Xorg -configure`. since i reverted it from "4 5 6 7" back to "4 5" scrolling just works again like charm. note that i'm running freebsd 6.1-rc, after just reinstalling all my ports from scratch. any thoughts or suggestions pls ?? cheers, martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 00:34:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3BC16A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBD4A43D4C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:34:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 94129 invoked by uid 0); 8 May 2006 00:34:33 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 8 May 2006 00:34:33 -0000 Message-ID: <445E9219.2040006@pobox.sk> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 02:34:33 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: X11 6.9 issue -- option "XkbOptions" and missing keyboard layout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 00:34:36 -0000 hello list! i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and after starting up X11 it displays a message saying that xkbcomp reports that it cannot find file "pc/sk_qwerty". and therefore it reverts back to "default" or something. this is very strange because i've been using the setting since X11 6.7. it seems the file is missing in the latest X11. (?) note that when it fails i can't, for instance, switch to console via ctrl+alt+F?. here is the setting in question from my xorg.conf: Option "XkbLayout" "us,sk_qwerty" # ++ 2005-03-13 mato note that i'm running freebsd 6.1-rc, after just reinstalling all my ports from scratch. any thoughts or suggestions pls ?? cheers, martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 00:43:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C7916A423 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michal.mertl@i.cz) Received: from vidle.i.cz (vidle.i.cz [193.179.36.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8261A43D6E for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:43:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michal.mertl@i.cz) Received: from ns.i.cz (brana.i.cz [193.179.36.134]) by vidle.i.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3041CC0C; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.i.cz [127.0.0.1]) by ns.i.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 459F8122A02; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:43:49 +0200 (CEST) X-AV-Checked: Mon May 8 02:43:49 2006 ns.i.cz Received: from genius.i.cz (brana.i.cz [192.168.1.10]) by ns.i.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A821122A01; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:43:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Michal Mertl To: Jonathan Horne In-Reply-To: <200605071219.41408.jhorne@dfwlp.com> References: <200605071209.15390.jhorne@dfwlp.com> <200605071219.41408.jhorne@dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 02:43:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1147049020.6775.19.camel@genius.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: memory usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 00:43:54 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > On Sunday 07 May 2006 12:09, Jonathan Horne wrote: > > i have a server that has 2GB ram, recently upgraded from 1GB ram. it runs > > apache2.0 with php5, sendmail with spamass-milter, dovecot, mysql5.0, > > cacti, and a couple other small things (like snmp, my bx irc shell, etc). > > > > when ever i look at the memory usage (via phpsysinfo, or cacti graphs), its > > nearly always showing less than 100mb of ram available. top shows several > > perls (probably spamassassin), 8 or so httpds (typical), but that would > > probably only account for (a liberal guess) 500-600 mb of ram. > > > > is there a good way to find out where this bottomless ram funnel leads to? > > or, should this behavior just be considered typical? > > > > thanks, > > jonathan > > update... > > i just upgraded to the new phpsysinfo rc2, and it shows more detailed > information about what the memory usage is doing. it shows that 1.57GB is > being used by buffers. what is the significance of 1.57GB of memory being > used by 'buffers'? I would expect a question like this is somewhere in the FAQ. It is typical that you only see a couple of hundred kilobytes of free memory on a (at least a little used) FreeBSD system. The system allocates 'physical' memory as needed (as long as there is some free) and only when there is no free memory, it starts to reuse some of the 'almost' free memory. 'Almost' free memory is mainly disk cache (your buffers). This is nothing to worry about. You can see there is a memory shortage when there is some swapping during normal workload (in top there appears "kb in/out" on the swap line). It is neither anything to worry about when you have some swap space used - FreeBSD is rather aggresively copying parts of memory to swap when it feels to. As long as it doesn't need to use the data in the swap often it's an optimization - even disk cache is better usage of your memory then inactive parts of your programs' memory. Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 00:49:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31ED16A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from msa1-mx.centurytel.net (msa1-mx.centurytel.net [209.142.136.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766E243D53 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:49:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (69-179-6-50.dyn.centurytel.net [69.179.6.50]) by msa1-mx.centurytel.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k480nqeI029121 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:49:53 -0500 Message-ID: <445E95AF.7090801@centurytel.net> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:49:51 -0500 From: "Michael D. Norwick" User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <445D5B26.2040605@centurytel.net> <20060507062932.D6E3.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20060507062932.D6E3.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Can't build bash3.1 during portupgrade -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 00:49:55 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: >Michael D. Norwick wrote: > > > >>freebsd 6.1 RELEASE Compaq Proliant SMP PII-200 (smp modified kernel) >> >>Over a week ago I was trying to rebuild Xorg and ran into an issue with >>libexpat.so.5 not found for 'fc-cache'. This was my fault because >>earlier I wanted expat2, built it from the 'ports' collection tarball >>current (at that time) from ftp2.us.FreeBSD.org, and apparently broke >>the dependency for libexpat.so.5. Following the advice given to another >>user on freebsd-questions, I did pkgdb -F then portupgrade -a in order >>to fix the dependencies and get Xorg 6.9.0. Little did I know that it >>would take over a week to upgrade and rebuild 119 installed packages on >>my PII-200 SMP Proliant. Other than a couple of burps with boost-python >>and postgresql, the upgrade has kept chugging along. Today, I am almost >>to the end and the Mozilla build flaked out. No worries on that yet, >>but the script suggested doing pkgdb -F again and restarting >>portupgrade. I dutifully followed and when portupgrade restarted it >>tried to build bash31aborted with the following error which I do not >>understand. When the 'make bash31' stopped on error the first time I >>manually downloaded the whole bash31 file set again to >>/usr/ports/distfiles/bash from ftp4.us and re-ran portupgrade -a. It >>stopped again with the same error. What is happening here? >> >>=> MD5 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. >>=> SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. >>...snip >>And then; >> >>=> Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.1-patches//. >>fetch: bash31-010: local modification time does not match remote >>...snip >> >>stop >> >>Michael >> >> >> >Personally, I would have used 'portmanager' to fix the situation. >Running it like this: portmanager -u -f -l -y should have corrected your >situation. > >In any even, delete everything in the /usr/ports/distfiles directory. >Next, update your entire ports collection. If you are still going to use >portupgrade, then definitely run the pkgdb -afFuv. It will give you a >better idea of what is happening. You might also consider running >portsdb -Uu if you have the time. It couldn't hurt. If you decide to use >portmanager, those last two steps are not required. > >Good luck! > > > >>petermatulis@yahoo.ca wrote: >>Are you sure you removed the distfiles or did you try to download over them? You should delete them. I downloaded over them so I will take both suggestions and delete the whole mess and rebuild. The Handbook and The 'Complete' book are not too clear on the advantages of portupgrade over portmanager. Right now the build(upgrade) got to 'gimp-print' and is freaking out with: 'warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions' for every .c file in the package due to not hiding #pragma's from traditional C in the header files. Ho-Hum. Maybe a problem with autoconf and friends??? Soldiering on. Thank You for the help. Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 01:18:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5525016A41B for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:18:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gvirtucio@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF6D43D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:18:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gvirtucio@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1255192pya for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 18:18:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:disposition-notification-to:x-mimeole:from; b=CWcXdTudFuQaLYu/w8ovMVvHFnx/G7k9NgP2vLAfKxkKGqsnZ0wb0iGWE57Mswak/Ye72d2Nhv+l/H1lq+VS9UNyGSBX65Ze7VscKMe/BcyB20zo9W4lVdqCHlL5bG+VSZ/RwR6FhRq07ueDJvC6MMm3X6SA97QN7srKUKGlArA= Received: by 10.35.22.17 with SMTP id z17mr1763027pyi; Sun, 07 May 2006 18:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loui ( [203.208.25.30]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id n40sm201022pyg.2006.05.07.18.18.09; Sun, 07 May 2006 18:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00a301c6723d$4c1146d0$5ac8a8c0@loui> To: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:18:15 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 From: "GiL A. Virtucio" Subject: Writing to a mounted NTFS drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 01:18:14 -0000 Hi, I have a mounted an NTFS partition that is set as "rw" in fstab. I can read the data stored in the drive but I cannot store new files on that drive. Anybody here encountered this before? Or can anybody please suggest a way to make that drive writable? the hadisk is detected as ad1: 38166MB at ata0-slave UDMA33 it is mounted in the /etc/fstab as /dev/ad1s1 /LouiGi ntfs rw 0 0 here is the output of my uname -a FreeBSD bok.gihl.eu.org 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Mar 3 15:43:19 PHT 2006 root@BoK.GiHL.Eu.Org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GiHL i386 and i have this error whenever i try to write a file... [BoK]/LouiGi@root> echo cristale >> kwak.txt kwak.txt: No such file or directory. [BoK]/LouiGi@root> touch lualhati.txt touch: lualhati.txt: No such file or directory thank you very much. ================================= Gil A. Virtucio Janitor/Kolektor/Messenger/Driver Asia Solution Phillippines Inc. 28/F Antel Global Corporate Center 3 Doña Julia Vargas Avenue, Ortigas Center, Pasig Mobile # : +63-916-3989695 http://gihl.eu.org/ ================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 01:35:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6F316A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jimajima9@yahoo.com) Received: from web50004.mail.yahoo.com (web50004.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D1E243D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:35:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimajima9@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 51362 invoked by uid 60001); 8 May 2006 01:35:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RtcCypAMxloWBX0lut/vZlqemT7QrHN4dLcSvNVinv+NUZ66hVNB6Wd8GbQFlN1Cs2TN3xDiJMgRN0lMp8HN5pSRIJBdgITs3uay4qf4zthMIQI4hZoMqnINfqd/hatHhvOnpiM+arYSLT0a5G6DJaAVzXE0znI/gwXs9g6cEkY= ; Message-ID: <20060508013519.51360.qmail@web50004.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.174.41.131] by web50004.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 18:35:19 PDT Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:35:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Angstadt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Newbie Package Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 01:35:21 -0000 Hi All, I'm new to FreeBSD and a first time poster to this list. I have used Linux for several years but would like to see what FreeBSD is like. tiny# uname -a FreeBSD tiny.brc.localnet 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 The daily security report has identified 10 problem applications. So far, I have fixed one app, lynx-2.8.5 by deleting it with pkg_delete. Then added the 2.8.5_2 package. Simple, no dependancy problems. Next, I tried to uninstall ruby-1.8.2_4 but found two dependencies: ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 portupgrade-20041226_7 which uninstalled with no problem. Then on to uninstall of ruby-1.8.2_4 : tiny# pkg_delete ruby-1.8.2_4 pkg_delete: '/usr/local/share/ri/1.8/system/created.rid' fails original MD5 checksum - not deleted. pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/share/ri/1.8/system' pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?) tiny# tiny# ls /usr/local/share/ri/1.8/ ls: /usr/local/share/ri/1.8/: No such file or directory tiny# ls /usr/local/share/ri/1.8/system ls: /usr/local/share/ri/1.8/system: No such file or directory tiny# I'm not sure how to proceed with this one. A different package problem: tiny# pkg_delete ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_13 tiny# pkg_add -r ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_15.tbz Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_15.tbz... Done. pkg_add: package 'ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_15' conflicts with ghostscript-gnu-7.07_13 pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove conflicting package(s) or -f to force installation tiny# pkg_delete ghostscript-gnu-7.07_13 pkg_delete: package 'ghostscript-gnu-7.07_13' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled: gv-3.6.1 apsfilter-7.2.6 ggv-2.8.5 gnome2-2.10.2 tiny# Do I really have to delete / update all these apps just to update ghostscript. One last example: tiny# pkg_delete libiconv-1.9.2_1 pkg_delete: package 'libiconv-1.9.2_1' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled: gettext-0.14.5 windowmaker-0.92.0 libgpg-error-1.0_1 ... plus another 125 packages Good grief, what am I doing wrong? This cannot be the correct way to manage errata. Please accept my apologies for the long message, I wanted to give a fuller picture of these problems. Jim __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 01:39:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A9A16A413 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.200.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D301E43D69 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:39:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <200605080139170120055isme>; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:39:17 +0000 Message-ID: <445EA144.3020506@computer.org> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 20:39:16 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: DRI and linux compat... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 01:39:24 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to get a game running. The game in question is NeverWinterNights though I don't think the problem is related to the game specifically. The game does actually run. It is just that it is so unbelievably slow. It would appear as though I have no DRI within my linux-compat. DRI is working outside of linux-compat. I have been unable to find much on the web regarding this. Basically this is as far as I've gotten: [/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin] root# setenv LIBGL_DEBUG verbose [/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin] root# ./glxinfo libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 5.0.3 radeon (screen 0) libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/radeon_dri.so drmOpenByBusid: busid is pci:0000:01:00.0 drmOpenDevice: minor is 0 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 4, (OK) drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 4 drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:01:00.0 libGL error: DDX DRI driver expected Radeon version 4.0.x but got version 5.0.3 libGL error: InitDriver failed display: :0.0 screen:0 direct rendering: No server glx vendor string: SGI server glx version string: 1.2 server glx extensions: GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_OML_swap_method, GLX_SGI_make_current_read, GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_hyperpipe, GLX_SGIX_swap_barrier, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig client glx vendor string: SGI client glx version string: 1.2 client glx extensions: I'm guessing the my linux libGL does not like my radeon driver's version? Any way to fool it? (Since I'd rather not downgrade my radeon driver.) I am running 6.1-Something as of yesterday. I have never had this game working. Just installed it today. So its not like it stopped working at some point. Not sure what else to post that might be useful. But here's a few: Ports of Interest links-0.98,1 = up-to-date with port linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 = up-to-date with port linux-atk-1.8.0_2 = up-to-date with port linux-expat-1.95.7_1 = up-to-date with port linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_3 = up-to-date with port linux-glib2-2.4.8_2 = up-to-date with port linux-gtk2-2.4.14_4 = up-to-date with port linux-jpeg-6b.33_1 = up-to-date with port linux-nwnclient-1.66 = up-to-date with port linux-openmotif-2.2.4_2 = up-to-date with port linux-pango-1.6.0_2 = up-to-date with port linux-png-1.2.8_1 = up-to-date with port linux-realplayer-10.0.7.785.20060201 = up-to-date with port linux-sdl-1.2.5_2 = up-to-date with port linux-tiff-3.6.1_6 = up-to-date with port linux_base-8-8.0_14 = up-to-date with port linux_dri-4.4.0 = up-to-date with port linuxdoc-1.1_1 = up-to-date with port linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_2 = up-to-date with port xmms-esound-1.2.10_6 = up-to-date with port xorg-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port xorg-clients-6.9.0_2 = up-to-date with port xorg-documents-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-100dpi-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-75dpi-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-cyrillic-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-truetype-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port xorg-fonts-type1-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port xorg-fontserver-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-libraries-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port xorg-manpages-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port xorg-nestserver-6.9.0 = up-to-date with port xorg-printserver-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port xorg-server-6.9.0_3 = up-to-date with port xorg-vfbserver-6.9.0_1 = up-to-date with port Some of Xorg.conf Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "drm" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "freetype" Load "type1" EndSection Section "DRI" Mode 0666 EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 DefaultFbBpp 32 SubSection "Display" #Depth 24 #FbBpp 32 Modes "1024x768" EndSubSection root# kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 10 0xc0400000 82d4a0 kernel 2 1 0xc0c2e000 6c1c snd_ich.ko 3 2 0xc0c35000 27614 sound.ko 4 1 0xc0c5d000 1c77c kqemu.ko 5 1 0xc0c7a000 6b710 acpi.ko 6 1 0xc4db1000 1a000 linux.ko Hardware is a Dell Inspiron 5100 2.6GHz. drm0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem 0xe8000000-0xefffffff,0xfcff0000-0xfcffffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci1 info: [drm] AGP at 0xe0000000 128MB info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.19.0 20050911 Any help is appreciated. -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 01:43:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0508216A43D for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:43:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CAA43D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:43:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from hera.int.dfwlp.com (hera.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k481hQkC090537 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:43:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:43:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605071209.15390.jhorne@dfwlp.com> <200605071219.41408.jhorne@dfwlp.com> <1147049020.6775.19.camel@genius.i.cz> In-Reply-To: <1147049020.6775.19.camel@genius.i.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605072043.26550.jhorne@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: memory usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 01:43:29 -0000 On Sunday 07 May 2006 19:43, Michal Mertl wrote: > Jonathan Horne wrote: > > On Sunday 07 May 2006 12:09, Jonathan Horne wrote: > > > i have a server that has 2GB ram, recently upgraded from 1GB ram. it > > > runs apache2.0 with php5, sendmail with spamass-milter, dovecot, > > > mysql5.0, cacti, and a couple other small things (like snmp, my bx irc > > > shell, etc). > > > > > > when ever i look at the memory usage (via phpsysinfo, or cacti graphs), > > > its nearly always showing less than 100mb of ram available. top shows > > > several perls (probably spamassassin), 8 or so httpds (typical), but > > > that would probably only account for (a liberal guess) 500-600 mb of > > > ram. > > > > > > is there a good way to find out where this bottomless ram funnel leads > > > to? or, should this behavior just be considered typical? > > > > > > thanks, > > > jonathan > > > > update... > > > > i just upgraded to the new phpsysinfo rc2, and it shows more detailed > > information about what the memory usage is doing. it shows that 1.57GB > > is being used by buffers. what is the significance of 1.57GB of memory > > being used by 'buffers'? > > I would expect a question like this is somewhere in the FAQ. > > It is typical that you only see a couple of hundred kilobytes of free > memory on a (at least a little used) FreeBSD system. The system > allocates 'physical' memory as needed (as long as there is some free) > and only when there is no free memory, it starts to reuse some of the > 'almost' free memory. 'Almost' free memory is mainly disk cache (your > buffers). > > This is nothing to worry about. You can see there is a memory shortage > when there is some swapping during normal workload (in top there appears > "kb in/out" on the swap line). It is neither anything to worry about > when you have some swap space used - FreeBSD is rather aggresively > copying parts of memory to swap when it feels to. As long as it doesn't > need to use the data in the swap often it's an optimization - even disk > cache is better usage of your memory then inactive parts of your > programs' memory. > > Michal well, i guess my system's top confirms what you say: Swap: 4071M Total, 4071M Free and, i wasnt experiencing any lack in performance, i was just curious. but i admit that i must be forgiven for almost doubting! thanks again, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 02:16:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA1416A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E9143D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:16:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1265278pya for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 19:16:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Qh6e/yY/7ZKJFw7NIZp8hDWra1CaRzvwGhKezRh4LyuQdnO+eJglO/EmMtatCAogZCY773VU3GPxq6Dw9WF9PkneyvZbrxtbmjgN552HuGj09JDTKkz6NAV3G5CeNP0FiVo7/KNb2vW5skwoE3GHNgZMngLezpJ0zn1w4DWQ7YI= Received: by 10.35.60.15 with SMTP id n15mr524654pyk; Sun, 07 May 2006 19:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.43.16 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:16:09 -0400 From: "Pablo Mora" To: "GiL A. Virtucio" In-Reply-To: <00a301c6723d$4c1146d0$5ac8a8c0@loui> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <00a301c6723d$4c1146d0$5ac8a8c0@loui> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Writing to a mounted NTFS drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 02:16:10 -0000 FreeBSD don't have support for write in NTFS partition. that I believe :P. -- Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft. BSD is for people who love Unix ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 02:25:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493FF16A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEFF43D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:25:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k482PIMN022154; Sun, 7 May 2006 21:25:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <445EAC05.7060605@daleco.biz> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 21:25:09 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060426 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "GiL A. Virtucio" References: <00a301c6723d$4c1146d0$5ac8a8c0@loui> In-Reply-To: <00a301c6723d$4c1146d0$5ac8a8c0@loui> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Writing to a mounted NTFS drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 02:25:21 -0000 GiL A. Virtucio wrote: > Hi, I have a mounted an NTFS partition that is set as "rw" in fstab. I can > read the data stored in the drive but I cannot store new files on that > drive. Anybody here encountered this before? Or can anybody please > suggest a way to make that drive writable? > Yes; I imagine that *everybody* who has tried this has encountered this (or something similar) before... If you RTF(riendly ;-)M, you'll see this: ---------------------------------- WRITING There is limited writing ability. Limitations: file must be nonresident and must not contain any sparces (uninitialized areas); compressed files are also not supported. The file name must not contain multibyte characters. ---------------------------------- A port exists (ntfsprogs) that *might* write NTFS a tad better, but I'm not sure that it's at all guaranteed. I'm certainly not going to do so ;-) IIRC, when you look up "proprietary" at Wikipedia, NTFS is a synonym. :-D Kevin Kinsey -- Lo! Men have become the tool of their tools. -- Henry David Thoreau From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 02:43:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2221316A400; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CFF43D45; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:43:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-102-190.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.102.190]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 May 2006 22:44:14 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,99,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="199624896:sNHT29829820" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <17502.44971.142792.538009@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:40:43 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <445E8E0E.9030705@pobox.sk> References: <445E8E0E.9030705@pobox.sk> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta26) "endive" XEmacs Lucid Cc: Subject: X11 6.9 issue -- option "ZAxisMapping" -- "4 5" vs "4 5 6 7" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 02:43:35 -0000 martinko writes: > i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and run into the > following issue: =09I have had this: > if i scroll my mouse wheel too fast, i'm suddenly moving in history > instead of scrolling the page. one quick finger movement is enough t= o > trigger this. very annoying. =09happen for over a year using: huff@>> usbdevs -v port 2 addr 3: low speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Microsoft IntelliMouse=AE Explorer(0x0095), Microsoft(0x045e), rev 4.24=20 =09and XF86Config: Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Buttons" "7" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" Option "Emulate3Buttons" Option "ChordMiddle" EndSection =09=09=09=09Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 02:43:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE8E16A405 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [63.240.77.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0A343D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:43:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20060508024345011008usiqe>; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:43:51 +0000 Message-ID: <445EB061.5040004@computer.org> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 21:43:45 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 'Atom Powers' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enquiry the FreeBSD scourse X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 02:43:53 -0000 Daniel wrote: > Dear Eric and Atom, > > Thanks for your great help. > I would like to create the mail account and password on the Unix mail > server, but, I seem like haven't find any command and method on the > handbook. Therefore, could you please kindly let me know where can I > find it. > Thanks a lot. > > Brief Background: > 1. Our company have used the Unix (FreeBSD) to do the mail server. > 2. The end users should be used the Microsoft outlook to receive their > mail. > We will to create the mail account and password on the UNIX mail server > first. > After that, the user should be successful to set up their mail account > from the Microsoft outlook. > > Please kindly let me know where can I find the resource from the > handbook. Not sure if this answers your question or not... but try this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail.html > Thanks a lot. > > Best regards > Daniel > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Schuele [mailto:e.schuele@computer.org] > Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 9:59 PM > To: Atom Powers > Cc: Daniel; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Enquiry the FreeBSD scourse > > > Atom Powers wrote: >> On 5/6/06, Daniel wrote: >>> Dear Sir, >>> >>> I haven't any experience on FreeBSD. Could you please kindly advice >>> any refer book to me? which will help me easily to handle the command > >>> and control. thanks a lot. >>> >> Dead-Tree form (a little dated): >> The Complete FreeBSD, Fourth Edition by Greg Lehey (Paperback - April >> 29, 2003) >> > > The Complete FreeBSD... a great book. And Greg Lehey was kind enough to > > provide a PDF format (and other formats) of the complete work for us: > > http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ > > > >> Current Documentation, and the authorative source: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ >> -- >> -- >> Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. >> --Atom Powers-- >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:03:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B6416A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:03:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from security@yourdot-mail.com) Received: from jupiter.nswebhost.com (jupiter.nswebhost.com [66.246.252.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD1E43D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:03:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from security@yourdot-mail.com) Received: from 55-172.dial.nortenet.pt ([212.13.55.172]:35663 helo=[192.168.1.13]) by jupiter.nswebhost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1Fcv6I-0007bl-Sm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 21:03:55 -0500 Message-ID: <445EB4F9.8080209@yourdot-mail.com> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 04:03:21 +0100 From: Carlos Silva User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - jupiter.nswebhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - yourdot-mail.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Convert mbox to IMAP files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:03:31 -0000 Hi, Someone know how can I convert mbox files to IMAP files? Thanks in advance! Best Regards, Carlos Silva, CSilva Web: http://www.csilva.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:04:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50AC16A415 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [216.148.227.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B10F43D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:04:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20060508030401m1100obnrue>; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:04:02 +0000 Message-ID: <445EB521.40402@computer.org> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:04:01 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Angstadt References: <20060508013519.51360.qmail@web50004.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060508013519.51360.qmail@web50004.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newbie Package Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:04:03 -0000 Jim Angstadt wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm new to FreeBSD and a first time poster to this > list. I have used Linux for several years but would > like to see what FreeBSD is like. > > tiny# uname -a > FreeBSD tiny.brc.localnet > 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: > Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 > root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > i386 > > The daily security report has identified 10 problem > applications. So far, I have fixed one app, > lynx-2.8.5 by deleting it with pkg_delete. Then added > the 2.8.5_2 package. > > Simple, no dependancy problems. > > Next, I tried to uninstall ruby-1.8.2_4 but found two > dependencies: > > ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 > portupgrade-20041226_7 > > which uninstalled with no problem. Then on to > uninstall of ruby-1.8.2_4 : > > tiny# pkg_delete ruby-1.8.2_4 > pkg_delete: > '/usr/local/share/ri/1.8/system/created.rid' fails > original MD5 checksum - not deleted. > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > '/usr/local/share/ri/1.8/system' > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps > the packing list is > incorrectly specified?) > tiny# > > tiny# ls /usr/local/share/ri/1.8/ > ls: /usr/local/share/ri/1.8/: No such file or > directory > > tiny# ls /usr/local/share/ri/1.8/system > ls: /usr/local/share/ri/1.8/system: No such file or > directory > tiny# > > I'm not sure how to proceed with this one. > > A different package problem: > > tiny# pkg_delete ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_13 > tiny# pkg_add -r > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_15.tbz > Fetching > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_15.tbz... > Done. > pkg_add: package 'ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_15' > conflicts with ghostscript-gnu-7.07_13 > pkg_add: please use pkg_delete first to remove > conflicting package(s) or -f to force installation > > tiny# pkg_delete ghostscript-gnu-7.07_13 > pkg_delete: package 'ghostscript-gnu-7.07_13' is > required by these other packages > and may not be deinstalled: > gv-3.6.1 > apsfilter-7.2.6 > ggv-2.8.5 > gnome2-2.10.2 > tiny# > > Do I really have to delete / update all these apps > just to update ghostscript. > > One last example: > > tiny# pkg_delete libiconv-1.9.2_1 > pkg_delete: package 'libiconv-1.9.2_1' is required by > these other packages > and may not be deinstalled: > gettext-0.14.5 > windowmaker-0.92.0 > libgpg-error-1.0_1 > ... plus another 125 packages > > Good grief, what am I doing wrong? This cannot be the > correct way to manage errata. You might look into portupgrade. /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (Just '# make install clean') It will handle upgrading both binary packages and ports, plus their dependencies. Don't forget to keep your ports tree up to date. HTH > > Please accept my apologies for the long message, I > wanted to give a fuller picture of these problems. > > Jim > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:05:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E808916A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9741643D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:05:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k483536D022347; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:05:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <445EB556.4030500@daleco.biz> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:04:54 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060426 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Angstadt References: <20060508013519.51360.qmail@web50004.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060508013519.51360.qmail@web50004.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newbie Package Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:05:08 -0000 Jim Angstadt wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm new to FreeBSD and a first time poster to this > list. I have used Linux for several years but would > like to see what FreeBSD is like. > Welcome! > tiny# uname -a > FreeBSD tiny.brc.localnet > 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: > Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 > root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > i386 > Good grief, what am I doing wrong? This cannot be the > correct way to manage errata. > > Please accept my apologies for the long message, I > wanted to give a fuller picture of these problems. > NP. First, foremost, **IANAE**, YMMV, #include and so on. Really. This tangled mess of dependencies is exactly what the ports system was designed to solve. Several automated tools exist to help. I'd suggest installing cvsup & portupgrade, and running something like `portupgrade -arR` (but check the manpage first to see what exactly that does). I use portupgrade, and occasionally portmanager, to keep almost 700 ports up to date on my workstation. Colin Percival's "portsnap" is up and coming, too, and I *think* is based on binary patching. In the event that you prefer to use pre-compiled packages (and it seems as if you have thus far), pass "-P" to portupgrade as well, and it will do its best to avoid compiling software during the upgrade process. Dru Lavigne has a good article on using portupgrade and friends at: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- University politics are vicious precisely because the stakes are so small. -- Henry Kissinger From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:15:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2FB16A404 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from mail.united-ware.com (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3CF43D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:15:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.united-ware.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k483GY1x009934 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 May 2006 23:16:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:15:37 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <445EB4F9.8080209@yourdot-mail.com> In-Reply-To: <445EB4F9.8080209@yourdot-mail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1501121.MUNoMWD9Z9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605072315.47735.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, MYFREEBSD2 autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.1/1448/Sun May 7 07:41:19 2006 on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Carlos Silva Subject: Re: Convert mbox to IMAP files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:15:22 -0000 --nextPart1501121.MUNoMWD9Z9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 07 May 2006 23:03, Carlos Silva wrote: > Hi, > > Someone know how can I convert mbox files to IMAP files? > Thanks in advance! If you are using Cyrus IMAP then this should do the trick: http://am-productions.biz/docs/mbox2cyrus.pl =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart1501121.MUNoMWD9Z9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXrfjxqA5ziudZT0RAgaKAKDJYnCfeF/WqArXHWiPIZqATH9nZACfejW3 +aNZF+rp7Q/A9F+Zcj7fcx8= =RPGr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1501121.MUNoMWD9Z9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:22:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8A716A404 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario@schmut.com) Received: from mail.schmut.com (mail.schmut.com [66.92.49.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B711A43D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario@schmut.com) Received: (qmail 5684 invoked by uid 89); 8 May 2006 03:22:47 -0000 Received: from schmut.com (localhost.my.domain [127.0.0.1]) by snoopy.schmut.com (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 20:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.223.4 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mario@schmut.com) by mail.schmut.com with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47435.192.168.223.4.1147058564.squirrel@mail.schmut.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:22:44 -0700 (PDT) To: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.9) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: mario X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) X-Primary-Address: mario@schmut.com Subject: build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mario List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:23:00 -0000 hi, just installed 6-release and want to build a new kernel. After doing a cvsup this afternoon i get this. My last Freebsd box was 4.11. I've never seen a kernel build fail. Am i missing something? [root@snoopy /usr/src]# make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun May 7 19:37:24 PDT 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------- ===> GENERIC mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/sys cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf; PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC config: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC:72: syntax error *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. here's me trying the old way: [root@snoopy /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]#config GENERIC config: ../compile/GENERIC: No such file or directory FYI: [root@snoopy /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]# uname -a FreeBSD snoopy.schmut.com 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. mario;> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:33:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B1C16A408 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vadim.vera@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DC943D6E for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vadim.vera@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so885863nfa for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 20:32:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=e2bWkFFe873wIfNi/AQ+8LDj0eJam5bkcMK6e6gPoDD9+rnPGLQiFm5a9heZuPyJCanuY6YufF6LRRJAjzvFJJBTYEQMr9fRBuomA7nRv8nzVPglHDkQvxwTOfQBXArUNPm7fQ23MWTmxnvICoPgRg1ZfuvYzVe8fY/afPZC+o8= Received: by 10.48.49.18 with SMTP id w18mr817249nfw; Sun, 07 May 2006 20:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from numl9exle2dj6v ( [64.251.14.200]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id o45sm1642823nfa.2006.05.07.20.32.46; Sun, 07 May 2006 20:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000401c67250$af40d690$141ea8c0@numl9exle2dj6v> From: "Vadim Vera" To: "FreeBSD - FreeBSD Questions" Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:31:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: URLs nightmare... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:33:02 -0000 Hi list: I'm trying to install Gnome 2.14.1 on my FreeBSD desktop (specifically = gnome2-lite) via ports. I've browsed the NET and found all software = sources needed to install it: gnome2-lite-2.14.1=20 The "meta-port" of the GNOME desktop slimmed down for FreeBSD releases Long description : Sources : Changes : Download Maintained by: = mailto:gnome@FreeBSD.org?cc=3Dports@FreeBSD.org&subject=3DFreeBSD Port: = gnome2-lite-2.14.1 Also listed in: gnome=20 Requires: ORBit2-2.14.0, aspell-0.60.4_3, atk-1.11.4, avahi-0.6.9_5, = bitstream-vera-1.10_2, cairo-1.0.4, cdrtools-2.01_4, dbus-0.61_3, = desktop-file-utils-0.11, djbfft-0.76_2, docbook-sk-4.1.2_3, = docbook-xml-4.2_1, docbook-xsl-1.69.1_1, dvd+rw-tools-6.0_2, eel-2.14.1, = eog-2.14.1, epiphany-2.14.1, esound-0.2.36_1, evince-0.5.2_2, = expat-2.0.0_1, fileroller-2.14.2,1, firefox-1.5.0.3,1, = fontconfig-2.3.2_4,1, freetype2-2.1.10_3, gail-1.8.11, gamin-0.1.7_2, = gcalctool-5.7.32,2 ...the list continues. So the problem is: I'm not connected all the time so I can't wait for the Makefile to fetch = the sources for me and opening link by link to see the sources will take = me a life. I'm wondering in which way I can know all the URLs of the = sources to download it with a download manager an port it manually later = on the installation progress. Thanks in advance... Cheers / Me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:55:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AC516A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [63.240.77.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E9443D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:55:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2006050803550201400kdorfe>; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:55:03 +0000 Message-ID: <445EC116.7020509@computer.org> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:55:02 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vadim Vera References: <000401c67250$af40d690$141ea8c0@numl9exle2dj6v> In-Reply-To: <000401c67250$af40d690$141ea8c0@numl9exle2dj6v> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD - FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: URLs nightmare... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:55:09 -0000 Vadim Vera wrote: > Hi list: > > I'm trying to install Gnome 2.14.1 on my FreeBSD desktop (specifically gnome2-lite) via ports. I've browsed the NET and found all software sources needed to install it: > > gnome2-lite-2.14.1 > The "meta-port" of the GNOME desktop slimmed down for FreeBSD releases > Long description : Sources : Changes : Download > Maintained by: mailto:gnome@FreeBSD.org?cc=ports@FreeBSD.org&subject=FreeBSD Port: gnome2-lite-2.14.1 > Also listed in: gnome > Requires: ORBit2-2.14.0, aspell-0.60.4_3, atk-1.11.4, avahi-0.6.9_5, bitstream-vera-1.10_2, cairo-1.0.4, cdrtools-2.01_4, dbus-0.61_3, desktop-file-utils-0.11, djbfft-0.76_2, docbook-sk-4.1.2_3, docbook-xml-4.2_1, docbook-xsl-1.69.1_1, dvd+rw-tools-6.0_2, eel-2.14.1, eog-2.14.1, epiphany-2.14.1, esound-0.2.36_1, evince-0.5.2_2, expat-2.0.0_1, fileroller-2.14.2,1, firefox-1.5.0.3,1, fontconfig-2.3.2_4,1, freetype2-2.1.10_3, gail-1.8.11, gamin-0.1.7_2, gcalctool-5.7.32,2 > > ...the list continues. > > So the problem is: > > I'm not connected all the time so I can't wait for the Makefile to fetch the sources for me and opening link by link to see the sources will take me a life. I'm wondering in which way I can know all the URLs of the sources to download it with a download manager an port it manually later on the installation progress. > Might something like: portupgrade -NFR do the trick? It will install a 'new' port (one not already on the system), fetch only, and grab dependencies as well. You say your not connected all the time. But you could run the above command (or something similar I would think) when connected and it would grab a distfile and place it in /usr/ports/distfiles for you. If you don't finish while connected.... just run the command next time you are, and it will pick up where it left off. HTH > > Thanks in advance... > > Cheers / Me. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:57:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202EA16A410 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF3443D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:57:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.6+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k483vpUW031280 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:57:52 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.50] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.6+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k483vpeN009432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:57:51 -0700 Message-ID: <445EC1C6.8060709@u.washington.edu> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 20:57:58 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <445D5B26.2040605@centurytel.net> In-Reply-To: <445D5B26.2040605@centurytel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_MEDIA_2_BODY 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Can't build bash3.1 during portupgrade -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:57:54 -0000 Michael D. Norwick wrote: > freebsd 6.1 RELEASE Compaq Proliant SMP PII-200 (smp modified kernel) > > Over a week ago I was trying to rebuild Xorg and ran into an issue with > libexpat.so.5 not found for 'fc-cache'. This was my fault because > earlier I wanted expat2, built it from the 'ports' collection tarball > current (at that time) from ftp2.us.FreeBSD.org, and apparently broke > the dependency for libexpat.so.5. Following the advice given to another > user on freebsd-questions, I did pkgdb -F then portupgrade -a in order > to fix the dependencies and get Xorg 6.9.0. Little did I know that it > would take over a week to upgrade and rebuild 119 installed packages on > my PII-200 SMP Proliant. Other than a couple of burps with boost-python > and postgresql, the upgrade has kept chugging along. Today, I am almost > to the end and the Mozilla build flaked out. No worries on that yet, > but the script suggested doing pkgdb -F again and restarting > portupgrade. I dutifully followed and when portupgrade restarted it > tried to build bash31aborted with the following error which I do not > understand. When the 'make bash31' stopped on error the first time I > manually downloaded the whole bash31 file set again to > /usr/ports/distfiles/bash from ftp4.us and re-ran portupgrade -a. It > stopped again with the same error. What is happening here? > > => MD5 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. > ...snip > And then; > > => Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.1-patches//. > fetch: bash31-010: local modification time does not match remote > ...snip > > stop > > Michael > Switch your ports cvsup server in your cvsup file, delete the patch file, re-cvsup, then try portupgrade again. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:59:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A611516A40E for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:59:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew.chace@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C8F43D5E for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew.chace@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1071976nzi for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 20:59:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=l/TttuxTVoP/dXuy3oTE1kvLbG4VCUw+cnsxtCXKye+wG1BbC8LcwFUMypXc6Jq/UN3d++gVpFuxkCuFokG4RYDsm3a9CFSdnTMe8Zoh1+wPxOxqcxIqo+VZt84LDDcEWT1IHRXQKKyWxvW7ofJWnBaNLoHWtzJxTxM0TXMd86A= Received: by 10.36.252.65 with SMTP id z65mr2510041nzh; Sun, 07 May 2006 20:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.6? ( [70.56.4.48]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 7sm1347590nzo.2006.05.07.20.59.26; Sun, 07 May 2006 20:59:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew To: Vadim Vera In-Reply-To: <000401c67250$af40d690$141ea8c0@numl9exle2dj6v> References: <000401c67250$af40d690$141ea8c0@numl9exle2dj6v> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:57:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1147060664.3352.54.camel@LatitudeFC5.network> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD - FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: URLs nightmare... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:59:30 -0000 On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 22:31 -0400, Vadim Vera wrote: > Hi list: > > I'm trying to install Gnome 2.14.1 on my FreeBSD desktop (specifically gnome2-lite) via ports. I've browsed the NET and found all software sources needed to install it: > > gnome2-lite-2.14.1 > The "meta-port" of the GNOME desktop slimmed down for FreeBSD releases > Long description : Sources : Changes : Download > Maintained by: mailto:gnome@FreeBSD.org?cc=ports@FreeBSD.org&subject=FreeBSD Port: gnome2-lite-2.14.1 > Also listed in: gnome > Requires: ORBit2-2.14.0, aspell-0.60.4_3, atk-1.11.4, avahi-0.6.9_5, bitstream-vera-1.10_2, cairo-1.0.4, cdrtools-2.01_4, dbus-0.61_3, desktop-file-utils-0.11, djbfft-0.76_2, docbook-sk-4.1.2_3, docbook-xml-4.2_1, docbook-xsl-1.69.1_1, dvd+rw-tools-6.0_2, eel-2.14.1, eog-2.14.1, epiphany-2.14.1, esound-0.2.36_1, evince-0.5.2_2, expat-2.0.0_1, fileroller-2.14.2,1, firefox-1.5.0.3,1, fontconfig-2.3.2_4,1, freetype2-2.1.10_3, gail-1.8.11, gamin-0.1.7_2, gcalctool-5.7.32,2 > > ...the list continues. > > So the problem is: > > I'm not connected all the time so I can't wait for the Makefile to fetch the sources for me and opening link by link to see the sources will take me a life. I'm wondering in which way I can know all the URLs of the sources to download it with a download manager an port it manually later on the installation progress. > > > Thanks in advance... > > Cheers / Me. Hello, Take a look at the 'ports' man page (man 7 ports). "make fetch-recursive" sounds like it should do the trick for you. -Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 04:10:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998ED16A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: from smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C5BD43D6D for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:10:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: (qmail 75710 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 04:10:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?75.7.236.228?) (jekillen@prodigy.net@75.7.236.228 with plain) by smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 May 2006 04:10:26 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <8e6875284479b938892d255182f50ac8@prodigy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions From: jekillen Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:10:55 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Subject: resetting clock after power outage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 04:10:31 -0000 Hello; I have a problem that I can't, so far find and answer to. How do you reset the system clock after a power outage has caused it to loose time? I have a machine that went down a month or so ago and since have noticed that the time stamp on such things as mail to the root account, and log entries is way behind what it should be. The system is FreeBSD v6.0 and does not have Xwindows installed on it. So I need to find out how to reset the clock from the command line. I thought I could do it with sysinstall but I don't see an option for actually setting the time, only the time zone. I presume that it is important, now, as I am running named on it as a master server and I believe it is important that it be in sync with the slave server running on another machine that was off at the time of the outage. I thought maybe the bios had something to do with it but haven't seen a way to reset the time in the bios either. Thanks for assistance in advance; JK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 04:16:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D6616A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:16:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E6B43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:16:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k484G8WI020645; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:16:08 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19345-04; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:16:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com ([10.0.0.4]) by wolf.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k484G8GY020639; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:16:08 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmailmel.bytecraft.internal (Not Verified[10.0.0.24]) by svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com with MailMarshal (v5, 0, 3, 78) id ; Mon, 08 May 2006 14:16:08 +1000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:15:45 +1000 Message-ID: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F117C8D7@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: resetting clock after power outage Thread-Index: AcZyVYWzHb3MXedASbqYxRsfadF6tgAACj7g From: "Murray Taylor" To: "jekillen" , "freebsd-questions" Cc: Subject: RE: resetting clock after power outage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 04:16:13 -0000 if you have ntp setup you may need to do a single =20 ntpdate -b or ntpd -q to get the clock within a reasonable limit so ntpd can run properly man (8) ntpd man (8) ntpdate Murray Taylor Special Projects Engineer Bytecraft Systems P: +61 3 8710 2555 F: +61 3 8710 2599 D: +61 3 9238 4275 E: mtaylor@bytecraft.com.au=20 -- "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." =20 Albert Einstein=20 --=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of jekillen > Sent: Monday, 8 May 2006 2:11 PM > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: resetting clock after power outage >=20 > Hello; > I have a problem that I can't, so far find and answer to. > How do you reset the system clock after a power outage has=20 > caused it to loose time? > I have a machine that went down a month or so ago and since=20 > have noticed that the time stamp on such things as mail to=20 > the root account, and log entries is way behind what it should be. > The system is FreeBSD v6.0 and does not have Xwindows=20 > installed on it. So I need to find out how to reset the clock=20 > from the command line. I thought I could do it with=20 > sysinstall but I don't see an option for actually setting the=20 > time, only the time zone. > I presume that it is important, now, as I am running named on=20 > it as a master server and I believe it is important that it=20 > be in sync with the slave server running on another machine=20 > that was off at the time of the outage. > I thought maybe the bios had something to do with it but=20 > haven't seen a way to reset the time in the bios either. > Thanks for assistance in advance; > JK >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > ***This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal.*** >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material.=20 E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- ***This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal.*** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 04:19:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4327916A426 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:19:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew.chace@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3098D43D62 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:19:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew.chace@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1074021nzi for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 21:19:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=AZrR2kfvxd7aTK0k3oZE/Zdr0UyZ+5SY3zDEKLeGXszABd4fL7lP0tNHEpK2oIFI2H5gJo8YmganSayeFsICO1GLLjZMViQOXL46M1Q+agVqHiMSJyDEcc+6CV4pvdMEPaHn2vr0/I84/0B6N2GYjU/fc0X1n6YIK5H9liM1MOI= Received: by 10.36.121.11 with SMTP id t11mr901999nzc; Sun, 07 May 2006 21:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.6? ( [70.56.4.48]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i5sm1554167nzi.2006.05.07.21.19.15; Sun, 07 May 2006 21:19:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew To: jekillen In-Reply-To: <8e6875284479b938892d255182f50ac8@prodigy.net> References: <8e6875284479b938892d255182f50ac8@prodigy.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 23:17:28 -0500 Message-Id: <1147061848.3352.58.camel@LatitudeFC5.network> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: resetting clock after power outage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 04:19:20 -0000 On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 21:10 -0700, jekillen wrote: > Hello; > I have a problem that I can't, so far find and answer to. > How do you reset the system clock after a power outage > has caused it to loose time? > I have a machine that went down a month or so ago and > since have noticed that the time stamp on such things > as mail to the root account, and log entries is way behind > what it should be. > The system is FreeBSD v6.0 and does not have Xwindows > installed on it. So I need to find out how to reset the clock > from the command line. I thought I could do it with sysinstall > but I don't see an option for actually setting the time, > only the time zone. > I presume that it is important, now, as I am running named > on it as a master server and I believe it is important that > it be in sync with the slave server running on another > machine that was off at the time of the outage. > I thought maybe the bios had something to do with it > but haven't seen a way to reset the time in the bios > either. > Thanks for assistance in advance; > JK Hello, See 'man ntpdate(8)'. Pretty sure that it's included with a basic installation; i.e. it's part of the system, not a port. -Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 06:12:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434C016A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick@nickwithers.com) Received: from mail.nickwithers.com (mail.manrags.com [203.219.206.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A3C43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:12:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nick@nickwithers.com) Received: from nickwithers.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nickwithers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0000B3A413; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:12:46 +1000 (EST) Received: from 150.203.2.85 (SquirrelMail authenticated user nick) by nickwithers.com with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:12:47 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <38173.150.203.2.85.1147068767.squirrel@nickwithers.com> In-Reply-To: <8e6875284479b938892d255182f50ac8@prodigy.net> References: <8e6875284479b938892d255182f50ac8@prodigy.net> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:12:47 +1000 (EST) From: "Nick Withers" To: "jekillen" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-nickwithers-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-nickwithers-MailScanner-From: nick@nickwithers.com Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: resetting clock after power outage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 06:12:58 -0000 On Mon, 8 May, 2006 2:10 pm, jekillen wrote: > Hello; > I have a problem that I can't, so far find and answer to. > How do you reset the system clock after a power outage > has caused it to loose time? Have a gander at date(1), if NTP isn't a goer, as others have suggested. (snip) > I thought maybe the bios had something to do with it > but haven't seen a way to reset the time in the bios > either. > Thanks for assistance in advance; > JK The BIOS setup utility really should have a time / date setting facility too, though! -- Nick Withers email: nick@nickwithers.com Web: http://www.nickwithers.com Mobile: +61 414 397 446 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 06:39:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91B016A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericdan@ucla.edu) Received: from smtp-2.smtp.ucla.edu (smtp-2.smtp.ucla.edu [169.232.47.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7BA43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:39:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ericdan@ucla.edu) Received: from mail.ucla.edu (mail.ucla.edu [169.232.48.150]) by smtp-2.smtp.ucla.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k486dGFj010510; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:39:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (pool-71-106-208-236.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.106.208.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ucla.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k486dAQc023436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 7 May 2006 23:39:12 -0700 Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:39:10 -0700 From: Eric Dan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kyrre Nygard Message-ID: <20060508063910.GA24621@box.myhome.westell.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kyrre Nygard References: <20060505170201.7BD7616A40B@hub.freebsd.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20060506101816.0216dfc0@broadpark.no> <20060506150820.GA985@eucla.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060506150820.GA985@eucla.lemis.com> X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.16-beyond (i686) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Probable-Spam: no X-Spam-Report: none X-Scanned-By: smtp.ucla.edu on 169.232.47.136 Cc: Subject: Re: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 06:39:18 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Greg 'groggy' Lehey (grog@freebsd.org) wrote: > On Saturday, 6 May 2006 at 10:22:11 +0200, Kyrre Nygard wrote: > > > > I have found a problem. > > > > I find the design / typesetting to be very unprofessional. > > It looks like a teenager wrote it, in Microsoft Word, but no offense. > > > > You just used the wrong typesetting system. > > > > Please check out the LaTeX Project as well as the Memoir class. > > > > It will do the typesetting for you, and your book will become a lot > > more comfortable for all of us to read. > > > > Let us know what you think! >=20 > I think you're a troll. >=20 i think the book is great, easy to read, helped me a lot and also saved me a lot of time. I hope you're gonna eventually write a new edition that covers 6.* releases. I really liked the network section in your book. Compare that to the one in "Running Linux Edition 5"! > Greg > --=20 > When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. > If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. > For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html > See complete headers for address and phone numbers --=20 Eric Dan ericdan@ucla.edu UCLA ID#103297286 http://www.vladuz976.com/ GPG key: FD13E94D ( B9D1 7D8D 34E0 D0B7 D3C9 4571 0BAC 1DC7 FD13 E94D) --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEXueOC6wdx/0T6U0RAqEgAJ9nT3T4jIWFQ3ZCFXSG+0pq6FfJYgCeP/UH GOx+llDezcWMQyRkrI27ERk= =xXrV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 06:55:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B620216A417 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61B843D6A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:55:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1310683pya for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 23:55:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eT4q5aLewRdI6r4MxKwEGh6aMcdHNtce7jWzlHKjLpF24w4A2d+A0twet+dm6aKRtoFLoW8o6A+fmmmaWYVghv9KhzgrhaUgZ1T5umG/0UJ120hDJuQ3pnYZGxPZ5Hg29zng9ooHEL9cIm2T/ZnXlyxPHQaytI+WCYMV3l36/ig= Received: by 10.35.87.8 with SMTP id p8mr2003027pyl; Sun, 07 May 2006 23:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.43.16 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 02:55:05 -0400 From: "Pablo Mora" To: mario In-Reply-To: <47435.192.168.223.4.1147058564.squirrel@mail.schmut.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <47435.192.168.223.4.1147058564.squirrel@mail.schmut.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 06:55:17 -0000 config: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC:72: syntax error ?? line 72.. check = it. -- Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft. BSD is for people who love Unix ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:56:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD99B16A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@mangohealth.org) Received: from pinnacle.akherb.com (60-105-237-24.gci.net [24.237.105.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF6143D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:56:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@mangohealth.org) Received: by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 0F8B05DAC; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:56:17 -0800 (AKDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pinnacle.akherb.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 Received: from [192.168.241.100] (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DB05D1F; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:56:16 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Mangohealth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:56:01 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060505170201.7BD7616A40B@hub.freebsd.org> <20060506150820.GA985@eucla.lemis.com> <20060508063910.GA24621@box.myhome.westell.com> In-Reply-To: <20060508063910.GA24621@box.myhome.westell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7808489.nMMuX0dzuZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605080056.13845.beech@mangohealth.org> Cc: Eric Dan , Kyrre Nygard Subject: Re: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:56:22 -0000 --nextPart7808489.nMMuX0dzuZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 07 May 2006 22:39, Eric Dan wrote: > * Greg 'groggy' Lehey (grog@freebsd.org) wrote: > > On Saturday, 6 May 2006 at 10:22:11 +0200, Kyrre Nygard wrote: > > > I have found a problem. > > > > > > I find the design / typesetting to be very unprofessional. > > > It looks like a teenager wrote it, in Microsoft Word, but no offense. > > > > > > You just used the wrong typesetting system. > > > > > > Please check out the LaTeX Project as well as the Memoir class. > > > > > > It will do the typesetting for you, and your book will become a lot > > > more comfortable for all of us to read. > > > > > > Let us know what you think! > > > > I think you're a troll. > > i think the book is great, easy to read, helped me a lot and also saved > me a lot of time. > I hope you're gonna eventually write a new edition that covers 6.* > releases. > I really liked the network section in your book. Compare that to the one > in "Running Linux Edition 5"! > > > Greg > > -- > > When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. > > If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipient= s. > > For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html > > See complete headers for address and phone numbers I will second that. I came to freebsd from solaris (yuck), wore the covers = off=20 my first copy and never looked back. Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@mangohealth.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Mangohealth \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - XanGo - http://www.mangohealth.org =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart7808489.nMMuX0dzuZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXwet2TFLCHYGSF0RAuW1AJ93AQDItFpFrkvDXp2DBGwlkdLFFQCfQcz2 cKNIptKFgTbybZ2VNbahDRw= =6dJD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7808489.nMMuX0dzuZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 09:10:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309A416A40B for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cscotts@mindspring.com) Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com [209.68.5.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AB4843D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:10:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cscotts@mindspring.com) Received: (qmail 89181 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 09:10:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 8 May 2006 09:10:08 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 68.79.13.249 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Scott Sipe Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 04:10:03 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) Subject: SMBus and mbmon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 09:10:10 -0000 First time I've tried to access smb devices or used mbmon, so apologies if this is very stupid. Running 6.0-stable (from awhile ago, December) on an Intel server motherboard. In the boot dmesg I get this line: pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) I have nothing relating to SMB compiled in my kernel. I do "kldload ichsmb" ichsmb0: port 0x400-0x41f irq 17 at device 31.3 on pci0 ichsmb0: [GIANT-LOCKED] smbus0: on ichsmb0 then "kldload smb" smb1: on smbus0 smb0: on smbus0 There are now the twoce devices in /dev, however, whenever I try to run mbmon I get # mbmon -S -s0 -d ioctl(smb0:writebyte): Device not configured (same result for s1 to try smb1) If I unload all the SMB related modules and run mbmon, I get # mbmon -d ioctl(smb0:open): No such file or directory SMBus[Intel8XX(ICH/ICH2/ICH3/ICH4/ICH5/ICH6)] found, but No HWM available on it!! Using ISA-IO access method!! * Winbond Chip W83627HF/THF/THF-A found. and just running mbmon gives an output # mbmon ioctl(smb0:open): No such file or directory Temp.= 127.0, 115.0, 127.0; Rot.= 0, 1834, 2812 Vcore = 0.00, 1.17; Volt. = 3.33, 5.00, 12.22, 1.62, 0.23 [etc] So I'm not sure what's going on. Is the existence of smb devices important? Do I get better monitoring? Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 10:59:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A1916A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from msa1-mx.centurytel.net (msa1-mx.centurytel.net [209.142.136.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FE143D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:59:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (69-179-6-50.dyn.centurytel.net [69.179.6.50]) by msa1-mx.centurytel.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k48AxdI4020438 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:59:40 -0500 Message-ID: <445F249B.1080307@centurytel.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 05:59:39 -0500 From: "Michael D. Norwick" User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <445D5B26.2040605@centurytel.net> <445EC1C6.8060709@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <445EC1C6.8060709@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Can't build bash3.1 during portupgrade -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 10:59:42 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > Michael D. Norwick wrote: > >> freebsd 6.1 RELEASE Compaq Proliant SMP PII-200 (smp modified kernel) >> >> ...snip >> /usr/ports/distfiles/bash from ftp4.us and re-ran portupgrade -a. It >> stopped again with the same error. What is happening here? >> >> => MD5 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. >> => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. >> ...snip >> And then; >> >> => Attempting to fetch from >> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.1-patches//. >> fetch: bash31-010: local modification time does not match remote >> ...snip >> >> stop >> >> Michael >> > > Switch your ports cvsup server in your cvsup file, delete the patch > file, re-cvsup, then try portupgrade again. > -Garrett > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Per the previous suggestion I built and installed portmanager, deleted the distfiles tree and started again. So far it is still moving along without error. Thank You for the help Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 11:02:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27AD16A40F for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105AB43D9B for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:02:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i24so942903wra for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 04:02:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=DJofKs6XJJQfPjr09djO5rhEFz7XEV7q/XisxF0+ggDPErLqfWZcyaQtjgLDUgn9Il7M8AcL6G1gMGNnao+OhbPnBJOVrED7SG+iZVRpKB7HP+OUWwCOwQ8zJ+v6KbdVG1eck0YHXWD12/BXMV3j8fmFVcV4Qjuqd++cClr1II0= Received: by 10.54.121.18 with SMTP id t18mr2084980wrc; Mon, 08 May 2006 04:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.117.10 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:02:07 +0300 From: "Perttu Laine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: 7-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:02:28 -0000 I have 7-CURRENT-SNAP009 on one testing computer and I'd like to update it to latest 7 sources. So can it be done via cvsup or how can update sources to latest? RELENG_7 seems to just delete everything with cvsup... -- kpn @ IRCnet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 11:07:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA8116A428 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C1343D5A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:07:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCBD1CC68; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:07:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DANGER (unknown [217.73.23.230]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CBB1CC62; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:07:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:07:03 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.14) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <571463983.20060508130703@rulez.sk> To: "Perttu Laine" In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.586 X-Spam-Level: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:07:45 -0000 Hello Perttu, Monday, May 8, 2006, 1:02:07 PM, you typed: > I have 7-CURRENT-SNAP009 on one testing computer and I'd like to update it > to latest 7 sources. So can it be done via cvsup or how can update sources > to latest? RELENG_7 seems to just delete everything with cvsup... yeah, cvsup is the right way, but instead of RELENG_7 tag use '.' -- Sincerely, Daniel Gerzo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 11:27:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1FF16A44A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE2543D66 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:27:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k48BRC4B027346 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 May 2006 14:27:15 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k48BRNWR008337; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:27:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k48BRMhG008311; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:27:22 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:27:22 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Perttu Laine Message-ID: <20060508112722.GA4450@gothmog.pc> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.399, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:27:46 -0000 On 2006-05-08 14:02, Perttu Laine wrote: > I have 7-CURRENT-SNAP009 on one testing computer and I'd like to update it > to latest 7 sources. So can it be done via cvsup or how can update sources > to latest? RELENG_7 seems to just delete everything with cvsup... There is no RELENG_7 tag (yet). You can change that to just a single dot character (`.'), and CVSup will pull the HEAD of the CVS branch for you (which is `CURRENT'). Note that CURRENT is not always buildable and not always stable enough for production use, though. Make sure you read and understand all the stuff explained here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 11:48:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AFD16A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFAF43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i24so948549wra for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 04:48:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qEf7IylgpjvxbsIJiHIJhpo2koC3xUupi7dLmV4OmujEtab1i5mRzroOvhlrNVfAmFdHG79jgbdt6H1c5NhlLCeUlhdJmphJnGAvm4Ur2uz7rLzCSE+GdgB5Ud98EefMG2WJGYuFcNphZoIG6gYwzaSGXk7t4tRqMLVDTK9i7Tc= Received: by 10.54.121.18 with SMTP id t18mr2117841wrc; Mon, 08 May 2006 04:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.117.10 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:48:56 +0300 From: "Perttu Laine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <571463983.20060508130703@rulez.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fwd: 7-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:48:58 -0000 .. Thank's. work fine. Now I have another question about 7-CURRENT. portupgrad= e and portversion are giving this error: --- uname(1) could be broken - cannot parse the output: 7-CURRENT-SNAP009 i386 ** Error occured reading /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf: uninitialized constant PkgConfig::OS_PLATFORM --- So. How can one make those pkgtools working? :) (this accidentally went into personal mail and not mailinglist so here it i= s forwarded) -- kpn @ IRCnet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 12:51:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D88D16A429 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk (host-84-9-223-82.bulldogdsl.com [84.9.223.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF58343D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695BFFD04D for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:51:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.devrandom.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75496-06 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:51:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.155] (unknown [192.168.1.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EXP1024-RC4-SHA (56/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF56FFD04B for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:51:37 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Howells Organization: K Desktop Environment To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:51:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <445EB4F9.8080209@yourdot-mail.com> In-Reply-To: <445EB4F9.8080209@yourdot-mail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605081351.22117.howells@kde.org> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devrandom.org.uk Subject: Re: Convert mbox to IMAP files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 12:51:50 -0000 On Monday 08 May 2006 04:03, Carlos Silva wrote: > Someone know how can I convert mbox files to IMAP files? > Thanks in advance! I presume you wish to store mails in mbox format on an IMAP server. The easiest way is to import the mails into a mail client, such as KMail, set up an account in KMail on the IMAP server, and copy them across. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 12:54:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD09616A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E09343D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:54:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 27184 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 12:54:11 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 May 2006 12:54:11 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3091D28425; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:54:08 -0400 (EDT) To: Jeff Molofee References: <20060506120043.A71F016A464@hub.freebsd.org> <445D39F2.3020101@cruzinternet.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:54:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <445D39F2.3020101@cruzinternet.com> (Jeff Molofee's message of "Sat, 06 May 2006 18:06:10 -0600") Message-ID: <44lktcr827.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fetch Problems... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 12:54:15 -0000 Jeff Molofee writes: > I'm having some odd problems with fetch. If I pkg_add or attempt > portupgrade, portmanage, etc, I get endless errors about fetch operation > timed out. I am able to ping the sites by ip and name, I am able to ftp > to the site, open the sites in firefox, galeon, etc. > > If I ssh into my own box and attempt pkg_add -r or portupgrade > everything works fine. > > Does anyone know why this would be happening... it has me completely > baffled. Hard to say. Try increasing the verbosity level ("-v" option). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 13:09:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8287816A404 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel.de.reuver@hccnet.nl) Received: from smtp30.hccnet.nl (smtp30.hccnet.nl [62.251.0.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92AE43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:09:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel.de.reuver@hccnet.nl) Received: from webmail.hccnet.nl by smtp30.hccnet.nl via webmail40.hccnet.nl [62.251.0.14] with ESMTP for id k48D936i025499 (8.13.6/2.05); Mon, 8 May 2006 15:09:03 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 62.251.0.62 (SquirrelMail authenticated user marcel.de.reuver) by webmail.hccnet.nl with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:09:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <39507.62.251.0.62.1147093742.squirrel@webmail.hccnet.nl> In-Reply-To: <200605072315.47735.mistry.7@osu.edu> References: <445EB4F9.8080209@yourdot-mail.com> <200605072315.47735.mistry.7@osu.edu> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:09:02 +0200 (CEST) From: "Marcel de Reuver" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Convert mbox to IMAP files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: marcel@de.reuver.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:09:05 -0000 On Sunday 07 May 2006 23:03, Carlos Silva wrote: > Hi, > > > Someone know how can I convert mbox files to IMAP files? > Thanks in advance! > Google for mbox2maildir if you want to convert to the Maildir format. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 13:14:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAAA16A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc3910@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD6D43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:14:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc3910@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so1805491pye for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:14:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nZhBorlj/m+zBPPfvJvVgRxpJMVD9dOqrWGlVuT4W4J5wl9cwqGzN1EBpk869E/9wU+HN3MiRalGzcLnoX4LXdPpLJnSfe3dcGi7ScZSr2jjCOV0f1P9jKcX8fO95oXFKs87RWMAHaM+MkTEB2Hb6/IjqKlYrQifOkpPEz7OK6A= Received: by 10.35.8.1 with SMTP id l1mr747904pyi; Mon, 08 May 2006 06:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.12.14 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51257d370605080614u76e7930bha35d96cae8cc0396@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 07:14:05 -0600 From: "Bryan Curl" To: Matthias.Apitz@sisis.de In-Reply-To: <20060507054134.GA1693@rebelion.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507054134.GA1693@rebelion.Sisis.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:14:11 -0000 Ok I'll bite. I installed fetchmail and fairly quickly had it retreiving mail into system= . I installed mutt and spent 2 hours looking at man and muttrc. Wow. What I dont get is how mutt replies to mail I retrived from ' mywork.mailserver.com'. I have to use '' to send the mail. I think I do it like this. mutt sends mail as usual. Then, fetchmail -S smtp.myispmailserver.net The mail bounces from myispmailserver.net with an error like me@walnut.bc.net (my private domain) is urecognized domain. (exact message escapes me at this time) The question is how do I tell mutt to send all mail out through ' smtp.myispmailserver.net'? Or maybe I need to configure sendmail or fetchmail differntly? Can someone point me to some sample configs or human readable help information? Thanks On 5/6/06, guru@sisis.de wrote: > > El d=EDa Saturday, May 06, 2006 a las 08:40:02PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier > escribi=F3: > > > > > I've been using pine *forever* now and am finding it really hard to fin= d > a > > good GUI to replace it :( Tried kmail, didn't like it ... > > > > Off the top of my head, the only thing(s) it needs to do is: > > > > multiple identities > > IMAP > > PGP > > xterm+fetchmail+mutt+vi is all you need; anything else is just not > usefull for real work; > > matthias > -- > Matthias Apitz > Manager Technical Support - OCLC PICA GmbH > Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany > t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 > e - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ > http://guru.UnixLand.de/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -- Bryan bc3910 'at' gmail 'dot' com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 13:23:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CC416A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:23:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6ABF43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:23:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13244) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Fd5i2-0009MI-VL; Mon, 08 May 2006 13:23:35 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D40581110; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from http.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4141C58110C; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amandla.biko8b.scii.nl (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993B858C6BE; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:23:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:23:30 +0200 From: albi To: "Bryan Curl" Message-Id: <20060508152330.0973bd4c.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <51257d370605080614u76e7930bha35d96cae8cc0396@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507054134.GA1693@rebelion.Sisis.de> <51257d370605080614u76e7930bha35d96cae8cc0396@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: scrappy@hub.org, Matthias.Apitz@sisis.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:23:37 -0000 On Mon, 8 May 2006 07:14:05 -0600 "Bryan Curl" wrote: > mutt sends mail as usual. Then, > fetchmail -S smtp.myispmailserver.net > > The mail bounces from myispmailserver.net with an error like > me@walnut.bc.net (my private domain) is urecognized domain. (exact > message escapes me at this time) > > The question is how do I tell mutt to send all mail out through ' > smtp.myispmailserver.net'? > Or maybe I need to configure sendmail or fetchmail differntly? sometimes i use mutt, this is the part in my .muttrc to get the from-address right : set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -falbi@scii.nl -oi -oem" -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 13:29:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A4916A422 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:29:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from genoa.webtent.org (static-70-110-70-42.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [70.110.70.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD3143D62 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:28:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from columbus.webtent.org (columbus.webtent.org [192.168.1.25]) by genoa.webtent.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92048A02A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:28:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 09:28:54 -0400 Message-Id: <1147094934.24620.60.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ibsh shell session fails using scp/sftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:29:01 -0000 Trying to use WinSCP to connect using the ibsh shell. The logs in the WinSCP program indicate 'Connection failed. Server sent command exit status 0', but I cannot find anything in the FreeBSD logs. I am hoping to find where my FreeBSD 6.0 box is trying to execute a command so I can add it to the approved list of commands to run by the user. The /var/log/auth.log only states... May 8 09:21:28 files sshd[22864]: Accepted keyboard-interactive/pam for webtent from 192.168.1.12 port 1130 ssh2 May 8 09:21:29 files sshd[22867]: subsystem request for sftp While the /var/log/messages and /var/log/debug.log have nothing as a result of the attempt to login. Is there anywhere else this may be logging on why the session could not start? Thanks in advance! -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 13:33:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7736816A401; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28ED443D45; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:33:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k48DXlkv005813; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:33:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k48DXkco005812; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:33:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200605081333.k48DXkco005812@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: ericdan@ucla.edu (Eric Dan), grog@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:33:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20060508063910.GA24621@box.myhome.westell.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kyrre Nygard Subject: Re: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:33:49 -0000 > > * Greg 'groggy' Lehey (grog@freebsd.org) wrote: > > On Saturday, 6 May 2006 at 10:22:11 +0200, Kyrre Nygard wrote: > > > > i think the book is great, easy to read, helped me a lot and also saved > me a lot of time. > I hope you're gonna eventually write a new edition that covers 6.* > releases. Actually, by this time, I am hoping for a jump ahead that covers 7.xx as well as changes in 6.xx. I was actually looking for the next edition to buy another when the announcement of putting it out free for download came out. ////jerry > I really liked the network section in your book. Compare that to the one > in "Running Linux Edition 5"! > > Greg > > --=20 > > When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. > > If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. > > For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html > > See complete headers for address and phone numbers > > > > --=20 > Eric Dan ericdan@ucla.edu > UCLA ID#103297286 > http://www.vladuz976.com/ > GPG key: FD13E94D ( B9D1 7D8D 34E0 D0B7 D3C9 4571 0BAC 1DC7 FD13 E94D) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 13:37:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EACF16A42A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:37:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D1343D6D for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13606; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:35:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) From: guru@Sisis.de Received: from hermes.sisis.de(193.31.10.38) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma013604; Mon, 8 May 06 15:35:03 +0200 Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de (rebelion.Sisis.de [193.31.10.34]) by hermes.sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA23459; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:37:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k48DbfMf009834; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:37:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@Sisis.de) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@Sisis.de using -f Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:37:41 +0200 To: albi Message-ID: <20060508133741.GB9605@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507054134.GA1693@rebelion.Sisis.de> <51257d370605080614u76e7930bha35d96cae8cc0396@mail.gmail.com> <20060508152330.0973bd4c.albi@scii.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060508152330.0973bd4c.albi@scii.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE (i386) Cc: scrappy@hub.org, Bryan Curl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias.Apitz@Sisis.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:37:53 -0000 El día Monday, May 08, 2006 a las 03:23:30PM +0200, albi escribió: > On Mon, 8 May 2006 07:14:05 -0600 > "Bryan Curl" wrote: > > > mutt sends mail as usual. Then, > > fetchmail -S smtp.myispmailserver.net > > > > The mail bounces from myispmailserver.net with an error like > > me@walnut.bc.net (my private domain) is urecognized domain. (exact > > message escapes me at this time) > > > > The question is how do I tell mutt to send all mail out through ' > > smtp.myispmailserver.net'? > > Or maybe I need to configure sendmail or fetchmail differntly? > > sometimes i use mutt, this is the part in my .muttrc to get the > from-address right : > > set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -falbi@scii.nl -oi -oem" Of course, you have to configure 'fetchmail' (normaly done in a file ~/.fetchmailrc) for fetching and sendmail for outgoing mail; in the M4-based rules files to generate the sendmail's submit.cf you may use something like define(`SMART_HOST', `[smtp.myispmailserver.net]')dnl to put all outbound mail to your ISP. matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC PICA GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ http://guru.UnixLand.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 13:39:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B2316A452 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:39:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0148C43D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:39:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (AUTH: PLAIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Mon, 08 May 2006 09:39:03 -0400 id 00056407.445F49F7.0000EF98 Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:39:02 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Robert Fitzpatrick Message-Id: <20060508093902.9ae6d0a7.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <1147094934.24620.60.camel@columbus.webtent.org> References: <1147094934.24620.60.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ibsh shell session fails using scp/sftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:39:06 -0000 On Mon, 08 May 2006 09:28:54 -0400 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > Trying to use WinSCP to connect using the ibsh shell. The logs in the > WinSCP program indicate 'Connection failed. Server sent command exit > status 0', but I cannot find anything in the FreeBSD logs. I am hoping > to find where my FreeBSD 6.0 box is trying to execute a command so I can > add it to the approved list of commands to run by the user. > The /var/log/auth.log only states... > > May 8 09:21:28 files sshd[22864]: Accepted keyboard-interactive/pam for webtent from 192.168.1.12 port 1130 ssh2 > May 8 09:21:29 files sshd[22867]: subsystem request for sftp > > While the /var/log/messages and /var/log/debug.log have nothing as a > result of the attempt to login. Is there anywhere else this may be > logging on why the session could not start? Run sshd with -d. Be sure to read the manpage on what this does first, as it may be an unpleasant surprise if you're trying to work on a machine that you don't have local access to. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 13:41:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A1E16A400; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mailman.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB1843D70; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:41:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (mailman.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5319F17B85C; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:41:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Received: from mail.ijs.si ([193.2.4.66]) by localhost (mail.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CnogMCBf54bJ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:40:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from brenta.ijs.si (brenta.ijs.si [194.249.156.1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D1117B941; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:40:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from f9pc04.ijs.si (f9pc04.ijs.si [194.249.156.4]) by brenta.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF3C4422D70; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:40:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by f9pc04.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C0739B0BCB; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:40:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Dejan Lesjak To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:40:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <445E9219.2040006@pobox.sk> In-Reply-To: <445E9219.2040006@pobox.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605081540.57413.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Cc: martinko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X11 6.9 issue -- option "XkbOptions" and missing keyboard layout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:41:13 -0000 On Monday 08 May 2006 02:34, martinko wrote: > hello list! > > i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and after starting up X11 it > displays a message saying that xkbcomp reports that it cannot find file > "pc/sk_qwerty". and therefore it reverts back to "default" or something. > > this is very strange because i've been using the setting since X11 6.7. > it seems the file is missing in the latest X11. (?) > > note that when it fails i can't, for instance, switch to console via > ctrl+alt+F?. > > here is the setting in question from my xorg.conf: > Option "XkbLayout" "us,sk_qwerty" # ++ 2005-03-13 mato Try Option "XkbLayout" "us,sk(qwerty)" Dejan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 13:56:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FD616A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from isachpaz@igd.fhg.de) Received: from mailgate2.igd.fraunhofer.de (mailgate2.igd.fhg.de [192.44.32.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0BA43D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:56:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from isachpaz@igd.fhg.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate2.igd.fraunhofer.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E590284E3; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:56:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pc1509 (unknown [146.140.222.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate2.igd.fraunhofer.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5B8A961; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:56:50 +0200 (CEST) From: "Ilias Sachpazidis" To: "'Aguiar Magalhaes'" , Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:56:49 +0200 Organization: Fraunhofer IGD Message-ID: <007b01c672a7$40f26490$0bcba8c0@pc1509> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007C_01C672B8.047B3490" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcZwRe+C362nteyHSgqZF37JoodFkQCYNfnA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: <20060505131202.44990.qmail@web31608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailgate2.igd.fraunhofer.de X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: Substitute command on vi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:56:56 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C672B8.047B3490 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I use the following: :.,$s/^M//g For ^M, you have to press Ctrl-V and then Best regards, Ilias --------------------------------------------------- Fraunhofer IGD Department Cognitive Computing & Medical Imaging Ilias Sachpazidis phone:+49/(0)/6151/155 507 Fraunhoferstr. 5 fax :+49/(0)/6151/155 480 D-64283 Darmstadt Ilias.Sachpazidis@igd.fhg.de Germany http://www.igd.fhg.de/~isachpaz --------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Aguiar = Magalhaes Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 3:12 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Substitute command on vi Hi list, I need to substitute a lot of characters ^M (ctrl+M) at the end of each line in my file. The command :%s/^M//g insn't have success. How can i do it ? Thanks, Aguiar =09 _______________________________________________________=20 Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail: 1GB de espa=E7o, alertas de e-mail no = celular e anti-spam realmente eficaz.=20 http://br.info.mail.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C672B8.047B3490-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 14:01:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B5616A40D for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:01:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A9E43D4C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:01:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so1175513ugf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 07:01:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ejk8NbnAApIMNwi8mIT2u3JVwmrnz5Knu/ej/fWe8r+PxKHN+L9l0knCmTO/w55m/x5zy1aD0dwm6zbcwaPUczQ+NAlBCA3GNGiVjJ1a/P6DnnkpdayHnXjtlH8asCpONPHCKu6A5GMeXo2/6MZG2yNP3cFnaEy4FG5bPsxVWzo= Received: by 10.78.17.4 with SMTP id 4mr578557huq; Mon, 08 May 2006 07:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 07:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605080701x6be704bek8a970b2b1446f8c2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:01:51 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20060507151413.J36981@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060507151413.J36981@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Next VNC related question ... recording X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:01:54 -0000 On 5/7/06, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > What are ppl using for this? I'm trying vnc2swf, but wonder if there is > something that records to a better (ie. non windows) format that works > well under FreeBSD? > > Thx > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.or= g > ) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Search freshmeat,there are others i thing..I am sure of one that takes snapshots in jpg.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 14:21:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB25616A407 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from genoa.webtent.org (static-70-110-70-42.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [70.110.70.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC69643D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:21:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from columbus.webtent.org (columbus.webtent.org [192.168.1.25]) by genoa.webtent.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D7D8A02A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:21:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060508093902.9ae6d0a7.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <1147094934.24620.60.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20060508093902.9ae6d0a7.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 10:21:20 -0400 Message-Id: <1147098080.24620.72.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ibsh shell session fails using scp/sftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:21:25 -0000 On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 09:39 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > Trying to use WinSCP to connect using the ibsh shell. The logs in the > > WinSCP program indicate 'Connection failed. Server sent command exit > > status 0', but I cannot find anything in the FreeBSD logs. I am hoping > > to find where my FreeBSD 6.0 box is trying to execute a command so I can > > add it to the approved list of commands to run by the user. > > The /var/log/auth.log only states... > > > > May 8 09:21:28 files sshd[22864]: Accepted keyboard-interactive/pam for webtent from 192.168.1.12 port 1130 ssh2 > > May 8 09:21:29 files sshd[22867]: subsystem request for sftp > > > > While the /var/log/messages and /var/log/debug.log have nothing as a > > result of the attempt to login. Is there anywhere else this may be > > logging on why the session could not start? > > Run sshd with -d. Be sure to read the manpage on what this does first, > as it may be an unpleasant surprise if you're trying to work on a > machine that you don't have local access to. Thanks, I can't seem to find all the debug messages on screen in a log file, so I'll try to not misspell or represent something here. After starting the session, it displays the subsystem message, then a 'Received SIGCHLD' and pid assignment, then the exit message... subsystem request for sftp debug1: sybsystem: exec() /usr/libexec/sftp-server debug1: Received SIGCHLD. debug1: session_by_pid: pid 23011 debug1: session_exit_message: session 0 channel 0 pid 23011 debug1: session_exit_message: release channel 0 debug1: session_close: session 0 pid 23011 I have sftp and even added exec to the approved commands along with anything else I could think of for ibsh with no luck, same messages. I tried adding /usr/libexec to my PATH, no help. files# echo $PATH /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/root/bin:/usr/libexec files# cat /usr/local/etc/ibsh/globals.cmds cd ls pwd logout exit touch mkdir rm pico scp sftp sftp-server ssh sshd exec -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 14:39:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD58E16A408 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C5843D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from mail.dfwlp.com (localhost.int.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k48EdIqF096434 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:39:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from 167.246.36.14 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by mail.dfwlp.com with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:39:18 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <12015.167.246.36.14.1147099158.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:39:18 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:39:25 -0000 on a dev box, did a cvsup and buildworld yesterday... and now my kernel says 6.1 stable! fbsd60-2# uname -a FreeBSD fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Sun May 7 18:33:48 CDT 2006 root@fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FBSD60-2 i386 *shrug* i look on freebsd.org, but i didnt see an announcement about it yet. how close to release does this put us? cheers, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 14:47:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3891C16A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.77.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B548843D70 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:47:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2006050814472101300gm5fhe>; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:47:21 +0000 Message-ID: <445F59F8.7090708@computer.org> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 09:47:20 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: <12015.167.246.36.14.1147099158.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <12015.167.246.36.14.1147099158.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:47:26 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > on a dev box, did a cvsup and buildworld yesterday... and now my kernel > says 6.1 stable! > > fbsd60-2# uname -a > FreeBSD fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Sun May > 7 18:33:48 CDT 2006 > root@fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FBSD60-2 i386 > > *shrug* i look on freebsd.org, but i didnt see an announcement about it > yet. how close to release does this put us? *Very* close.... but not there yet. Only after an official announcement is it released. > > cheers, > jonathan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:11:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04B516A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (mail-cluster.cnf.com [63.230.177.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EA043D53 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:11:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA5814C0B6; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com (cnfdcx-131-slb-01-in.cnf.com [10.0.108.131]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7D414B846; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com ([10.40.10.68]) by ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 8 May 2006 08:11:00 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:10:55 -0500 Message-ID: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04390A59@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: php4 port upgrade Thread-Index: AcZyFoPSh7regLoCSSSR20Wbp+Uk2QAmwAwQ From: "Zimmerman, Eric" To: "Dave" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2006 15:11:00.0538 (UTC) FILETIME=[9D97B1A0:01C672B1] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: RE: php4 port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:11:04 -0000 > Hello, > Is there any known issues or things to watch out for when doing the > latest php4 upgrade? The notes in the UPDATING file indicated a change in > the status of the .cli binary. If one has mod_php4 and the php4-extensions > already installed is the upgrade a smooth one? > Thanks. > Dave. Mine seemed to go fine via portmanager after doing a make config in the php4 directory as UPDATING indicates to do. No issues so far that I have seen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:14:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CC116A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B76943D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 45794 invoked by uid 0); 8 May 2006 15:14:32 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 8 May 2006 15:14:32 -0000 Message-ID: <445F6058.5000404@pobox.sk> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:14:32 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dejan Lesjak References: <445E9219.2040006@pobox.sk> <200605081540.57413.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <200605081540.57413.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X11 6.9 issue -- option "XkbOptions" and missing keyboard layout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:14:36 -0000 Dejan Lesjak wrote: > On Monday 08 May 2006 02:34, martinko wrote: > >> hello list! >> >> i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and after starting up X11 it >> displays a message saying that xkbcomp reports that it cannot find file >> "pc/sk_qwerty". and therefore it reverts back to "default" or something. >> >> this is very strange because i've been using the setting since X11 6.7. >> it seems the file is missing in the latest X11. (?) >> >> note that when it fails i can't, for instance, switch to console via >> ctrl+alt+F?. >> >> here is the setting in question from my xorg.conf: >> Option "XkbLayout" "us,sk_qwerty" # ++ 2005-03-13 mato >> > > Try > Option "XkbLayout" "us,sk(qwerty)" > > > Dejan > dejan, thanks, that seems to work! :-)) i haven't noticed it mentioned anywhere, though. :( the other issue i've just noticed is that my keyboard layout switching doesn't work as it used to. this is my setting i've been using: Option "XkbOptions" "grp:shift_toggle,grp_led:scroll,compose:ralt" note that i checked your previous advice in gnome via its panel. led was turned on. so the problem is with "grp:shift_toggle" only. any advice on this one pls ?? cheers, martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:25:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3F016A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4488043D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1219293nzf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 08:25:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mFaDspW1k5x3gm4BwClvIMiWx4zV+pNLnUbmIgye0MfBvYaeS6oBJWaxlviCZqERiEp2BvPbsiJqCZmpzsmGub5vWtvRGbw19daHpZfxsZp2fcw9uluM5lZ1LZJEvRlmpGg3K4viXWa4N4y7KJHTMhZWOg1tIOk0SAigfbTU/yg= Received: by 10.65.156.14 with SMTP id i14mr1096675qbo; Mon, 08 May 2006 08:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:25:20 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: "Robert Fitzpatrick" In-Reply-To: <1147020785.24620.31.camel@columbus.webtent.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1147019550.24620.23.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <1147020785.24620.31.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: ibsh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:25:21 -0000 Have you looked at the "scponly" shell? On 5/7/06, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 12:32 -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Anyone using ibsh shell for locking users in to their home directory? I > > just found out about this googling and installed the port on my FreeBSD > > 6.0 box, but can't seem to get it working.... > > > Sorry for posting to quickly, I found that merely editing > the /etc/passwd file to change the shell did not get it done. I have > ibsh shell working now, but something peculiar happening. I can login > from my Linux box using ssh and all is as expected, but if I use the > WinSCP program, commonly used by our staff, it does not believe there is > an SFTP server running. Of course, logging in using WinSCP with a user > of a different shell works perfectly. Here is ibsh commands I am > allowing and the log from WinSCP... > > files# cat globals.cmds > # Add any commands the user may execute. Even shell commands. > # You have to allow logout and/or exit, so the user can logout! > # cd and pwd should also be allowed. Note: other shell builtin > # commands are not yet implemented! > cd > ls > pwd > logout > exit > > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 -----------------------------------------------= --------------------------- > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 WinSCP Version 3.7.6 (Build 306) (OS 5.2.3790 S= ervice Pack 1) > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 Login time: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:48:40 PM > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 -----------------------------------------------= --------------------------- > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 Session name: webtent@192.168.1.7 > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 Host name: 192.168.1.7 (Port: 22) > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.600 User name: webtent (Password: Yes, Key file: No= ) > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Transfer Protocol: SFTP (SCP) > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 SSH protocol version: 2; Compression: No > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Agent forwarding: No; TIS/CryptoCard: No; KI: Y= es; GSSAPI: No > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Ciphers: aes,blowfish,3des,WARN,des; Ssh2DES: N= o > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Ping type: -, Ping interval: 30 sec; Timeout: 1= 5 sec > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 SSH Bugs: -,-,-,-,-,-,-,- > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 SFTP Bugs: -,-,- > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Proxy: none > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.610 Return code variable: Autodetect; Lookup user g= roups: Yes > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Shell: default, EOL: 0 > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Local directory: default, Remote directory: hom= e, Update: No, Cache: Yes > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Cache directory changes: Yes, Permanent: Yes > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Clear aliases: Yes, Unset nat.vars: Yes, Resolv= e symlinks: Yes > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 Alias LS: No, Ign LS warn: Yes, Scp1 Comp: No > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.621 -----------------------------------------------= --------------------------- > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.771 Looking up host "192.168.1.7" > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.781 Connecting to 192.168.1.7 port 22 > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.831 Server version: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.2p1 FreeBSD-2= 0050903 > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.851 We claim version: SSH-2.0-WinSCP_release_3.7.6 > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.861 Using SSH protocol version 2 > . 2006-05-07 12:48:40.881 Doing Diffie-Hellman group exchange > . 2006-05-07 12:48:41.001 Doing Diffie-Hellman key exchange > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.273 Host key fingerprint is: > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.293 ssh-dss 2048 0a:59:6c:0f:b9:18:2b:68:1b:e0:5d:3= b:d6:5a:e0:65 > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.313 Initialised AES-256 client->server encryption > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.333 Initialised HMAC-SHA1 client->server MAC algori= thm > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.353 Initialised AES-256 server->client encryption > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.373 Initialised HMAC-SHA1 server->client MAC algori= thm > ! 2006-05-07 12:48:42.413 Using username "webtent". > ! 2006-05-07 12:48:42.523 Using keyboard-interactive authentication. > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.543 Password: prompt from server > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.563 Responding with stored password. > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.603 Access granted > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.623 Opened channel for session > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.653 Started a shell/command > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.673 -----------------------------------------------= --------------------------- > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.693 Using SFTP protocol. > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.724 Doing startup conversation with host. > > 2006-05-07 12:48:42.744 Type: SSH_FXP_INIT, Size: 5, Number: -1 > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.774 Server sent command exit status 0 > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.794 All channels closed. Disconnecting > . 2006-05-07 12:48:42.824 Server closed network connection > * 2006-05-07 12:48:42.854 (ESshFatal) Cannot initialize SFTP protocol. Is= the host running a SFTP server? > * 2006-05-07 12:48:42.854 Connection has been unexpectedly closed. Server= sent command exit status 0. > > -- > Robert > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:27:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C8D16A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:27:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8567D43D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:27:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1219880nzf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 08:27:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Or5XPtD4KINI2ZWXBlQuNYn0qD2gEQH9wkzob1nfI9hz2p7jLnrJjwFrJgW3Bq0x1IW0MYPApday7pu7TE8CdA7cRc19iaCNcSwpHcfQN+xXwEQ0b6/+pzmcM53hFDOsgoCK35H44GUq41pFTV44jtXG2VlCTnNYbkheVNTWYT4= Received: by 10.65.150.18 with SMTP id c18mr1106579qbo; Mon, 08 May 2006 08:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:27:33 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: Z.C.B. In-Reply-To: <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dominique Goncalves Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:27:35 -0000 On 5/7/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:56:09 +0100 > Dominique Goncalves wrote: > > > > > Why FreeBSD tries to use ldap database if my user system is on > > files ? Thanks for the help. > > Did you ever find a fix for this? I am running into the same thing > myself. Check your pam.d configuration, particularly /etc/pam.d/login -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:32:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E815B16A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgabel@thilelli.net) Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (smtp.thilelli.net [62.212.120.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB7B43D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jgabel@thilelli.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D5E2846F; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:32:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at thilelli.net Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ly0jGvr2-9UU; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:32:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7B71D28450; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:32:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:32:10 +0200 From: Julien Gabel To: "Zimmerman, Eric" Message-ID: <20060508153209.GA54676@bento.thilelli.net> References: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04390A59@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04390A59@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Address-Home: 27, rue Olivier de Serres, 75015, Paris, France X-Address-Organization: Unilog, a LogicaCMG company - France X-Phone-Professional: +33 1 56 37 79 30 X-Phone-Mobile: +33 6 62 23 69 56 X-Web-Home-Page: http://www.thilelli.net/~jgabel/ X-GPG-Key: http://www.thilelli.net/~jgabel/pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: 2FA2 6C20 027C 12E0 7743 2D2A B706 C680 FB6A B330 Cc: Dave , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: php4 port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:32:14 -0000 --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> Is there any known issues or things to watch out for when doing the >> latest php4 upgrade? The notes in the UPDATING file indicated a change >> in the status of the .cli binary. If one has mod_php4 and the >> php4-extensions already installed is the upgrade a smooth one? > Mine seemed to go fine via portmanager after doing a make config in the > php4 directory as UPDATING indicates to do. No issues so far that I have > seen Using portupgrade, i had to recompile all php4-* found in /var/db/pkg and the dependancies. All went well, except for the SSL support i use throuth squirrelmail. I use different knobs in the past in order to be able to access imaps via squirrelmail, the last one was "WITH_OPENSSL_BASE". But according to the current ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk makefile, it seems deprecated in favor of "WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=3Dyes". So i tried: # portupgrade -rRf -m 'WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=3Dyes' squirrelmail instead of: # portupgrade -rRf -m '-DWITH_OPENSSL_BASE' squirrelmail without much success for the moment... --=20 Julien Gabel. --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEX2R3twbGgPtqszARAnU3AJ0XbRCgxSYCFydEw3Huh2xU9aqMBwCeJhEu Xa0kWlAQ8JEHNjB4gx4eCxA= =66d8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:33:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD39416A40B for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6638543D76 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:33:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 4995 invoked by uid 0); 8 May 2006 15:33:20 -0000 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.10.20?) (86.49.10.20) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 8 May 2006 15:33:20 -0000 Message-ID: <445F64BF.7030903@pobox.sk> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:33:19 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey To: freebsd-mozilla@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: seamonkey -- building calendar (option) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:33:27 -0000 hello! i've just upgraded from mozilla (1.7.12) to seamonkey (1.0.1) and discovered the following issue: there's WITH_CALENDAR make switch in the port which is/was supposed to turn building of mozilla with calendar module. i've been happily using it with mozilla suite. the switch is still in seamonkey's makefile but i haven't got calendar module after compilation of the port. :-( /note that i'm running seamonkey on freebsd 6.1-rc, after just reinstalling all my ports from scratch./ any thoughts or suggestions pls ?? cheers, martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:50:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDA416A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1171743D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:50:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13279) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Fd80H-000Iz8-IU for questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 15:50:33 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CF4581108 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:50:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from http.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F84B58110C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:50:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7AE58C6BE for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:50:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <445F68C5.9060505@scii.nl> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:50:29 +0200 From: albi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: status BSDinstaller for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:50:35 -0000 some weeks ago there was an announcement which mentioned the new BSDinstaller Beta2, which pointed to to this url : http://meonstuff.blogspot.com/ i've downloaded the iso and tried it, and i started to realise how much i like the current FreeBSD installer what i miss in the beta2 of the BSDinstaller for FreeBSD is the following : - change console-font - set keyboard speed but much much more important : - there's no auto-defaults for partitioning - there's not the nice option to correct the disc-geometry - there are no post-install options afair on top of this the partitioning-process itself was very confusing... later i've tried dragonflyBSD (when i read that it's already using BSDinstaller), and the partitioning-process was not confusing at all also, the initial start-up colour reminded me very much of an MS-WindowsNT install, is this done on purpose for some reason ? (i like the blue and other colour-scheme from the old install better :) so.. i hope that this feedback will be read, and i'm curious what other people's experiences are here are some more urls : http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/BSDInstaller http://www.bsdinstaller.org/ -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:55:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C8816A41A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BEB43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:55:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.6+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k48FtotC020011 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:55:51 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.50] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.6+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k48FtnQZ001389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:55:50 -0700 Message-ID: <445F6A0C.7040101@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:55:56 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <445D5B26.2040605@centurytel.net> <445EC1C6.8060709@u.washington.edu> <445F249B.1080307@centurytel.net> In-Reply-To: <445F249B.1080307@centurytel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Can't build bash3.1 during portupgrade -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:55:53 -0000 Michael D. Norwick wrote: > Garrett Cooper wrote: > > >> Michael D. Norwick wrote: >> >> >>> freebsd 6.1 RELEASE Compaq Proliant SMP PII-200 (smp modified kernel) >>> >>> ...snip >>> /usr/ports/distfiles/bash from ftp4.us and re-ran portupgrade -a. It >>> stopped again with the same error. What is happening here? >>> >>> => MD5 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. >>> => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. >>> ...snip >>> And then; >>> >>> => Attempting to fetch from >>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.1-patches//. >>> fetch: bash31-010: local modification time does not match remote >>> ...snip >>> >>> stop >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >> Switch your ports cvsup server in your cvsup file, delete the patch >> file, re-cvsup, then try portupgrade again. >> -Garrett >> > Per the previous suggestion I built and installed portmanager, deleted > the distfiles tree and started again. So far it is still moving along > without error. > > Thank You for the help > > Michael Guess I was too late then. I noticed this error was consistently occurring, so what I did was completed what I suggested above and everything worked. The reason for having to do that was because a) the CVSUP server I was sync'ing with for ports apparently was not in service any more, and b) I downloaded the patch directly from the bash site and that didn't seem to have worked, but instead brought up the before mentioned error about the modification times being different. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:55:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E920616A422 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:55:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D6C43D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:55:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd85F-000EZE-2o; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:55:56 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:55:26 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Jonathan Horne , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE !! Thread-Index: AcZyt9JUEQBy1d6rEdqrDgAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <12015.167.246.36.14.1147099158.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:56:01 -0000 On 8/5/06 15:39, "Jonathan Horne" wrote: > on a dev box, did a cvsup and buildworld yesterday... and now my kernel > says 6.1 stable! > > fbsd60-2# uname -a > FreeBSD fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Sun May > 7 18:33:48 CDT 2006 > root@fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FBSD60-2 i386 > > *shrug* i look on freebsd.org, but i didnt see an announcement about it > yet. how close to release does this put us? It essentially means that the release has been finished, and is being built/uploaded. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:57:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E6516A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuku@www.kukulies.org) Received: from www.kukulies.org (www.kukulies.org [213.146.112.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E7843D70 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:57:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kuku@www.kukulies.org) Received: from www.kukulies.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.kukulies.org (8.13.3/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k48FvOXw072891 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:57:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kuku@www.kukulies.org) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by www.kukulies.org (8.13.3/8.12.10/Submit) id k48FvOo4072890 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:57:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kuku) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:57:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <200605081557.k48FvOo4072890@www.kukulies.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: could not determine fs type - fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:57:29 -0000 I replaced a disk that had trouble with fsck in a 5.3 system and connected it to a 5.2.1 system for further examinaton. starting fsck /dev/ad3 gave me an error: could not determine file system type. Had there been some change in FS right between FreeBSD 5.2 and 5.3 such that either systems couldn't recognize each others FSs? -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_kukulies.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:58:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0445F16A408 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF6A43D5E for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:58:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.6+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k48FwHTX010426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:58:18 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.50] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.6+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k48FwElE002152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:58:16 -0700 Message-ID: <445F6A9E.4000702@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:58:22 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <445F64BF.7030903@pobox.sk> In-Reply-To: <445F64BF.7030903@pobox.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: seamonkey -- building calendar (option) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:58:28 -0000 martinko wrote: > hello! > > i've just upgraded from mozilla (1.7.12) to seamonkey (1.0.1) and > discovered the following issue: > > there's WITH_CALENDAR make switch in the port which is/was supposed to > turn building of mozilla with calendar module. i've been happily using > it with mozilla suite. the switch is still in seamonkey's makefile but i > haven't got calendar module after compilation of the port. :-( > > /note that i'm running seamonkey on freebsd 6.1-rc, after just > reinstalling all my ports from scratch./ > > any thoughts or suggestions pls ?? > > cheers, > > martin > For now you can just download the extension from Mozilla's site . -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 16:10:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C7916A498 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc3910@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4DE43D70 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:10:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc3910@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so17545pye for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 09:10:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=TtFNiU/ERbmsf1gc7LylKmZi9adhaPIVHlytihUgMVw6aDKjRwcN3O6mZlCDi9YjuRIaeqntDfhKXy4cw/w3EUBM2HMXhD0+XsR37WrNQLWqh8Mr2wXJhLe9apY9GamSaZ9zvWWvyFzOFoj7Tmfi7t9lvIRAkrF2C+lgDHSUwTU= Received: by 10.35.21.1 with SMTP id y1mr788223pyi; Mon, 08 May 2006 09:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.12.14 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51257d370605080910r5b499936mb15fd6122023c04f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:10:24 -0600 From: "Bryan Curl" To: albi In-Reply-To: <20060508152330.0973bd4c.albi@scii.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507054134.GA1693@rebelion.Sisis.de> <51257d370605080614u76e7930bha35d96cae8cc0396@mail.gmail.com> <20060508152330.0973bd4c.albi@scii.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: scrappy@hub.org, Matthias.Apitz@sisis.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:10:41 -0000 If that just fixes From in the header Im not sure that is entirely my problem. Since my bounces seem to be related to my localhost domain name, I wonder about a setting like described here from sendmail's manual. You can have your host masquerade as another using MASQUERADE_AS(`host.domain') This causes mail being sent to be labeled as coming from the indicated host.domain, rather than $j. One normally masquerades as one of one's own subdomains (for example, it's unlikely that Berkeley would choose to masquerade as an MIT site). This behaviour is modified by a plethora of FEATUREs ; in particular, see masquerade_envelope, allmasquerade , limited_masquerade, and masquerade_entire_domain . On 5/8/06, albi wrote: > > On Mon, 8 May 2006 07:14:05 -0600 > "Bryan Curl" wrote: > > > mutt sends mail as usual. Then, > > fetchmail -S smtp.myispmailserver.net > > > > The mail bounces from myispmailserver.net with an error like > > me@walnut.bc.net (my private domain) is urecognized domain. (exact > > message escapes me at this time) > > > > The question is how do I tell mutt to send all mail out through ' > > smtp.myispmailserver.net'? > > Or maybe I need to configure sendmail or fetchmail differntly? > > sometimes i use mutt, this is the part in my .muttrc to get the > from-address right : > > set sendmail=3D"/usr/sbin/sendmail -falbi@scii.nl -oi -oem" > > -- > grtjs, albi > gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import > -- -- Bryan bc3910 'at' gmail 'dot' com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 16:13:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E50916A436 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F24043D66 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:13:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k48GDeem027125; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:13:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <445F6E2F.1030703@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:13:35 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060426 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: martinko References: <445F64BF.7030903@pobox.sk> In-Reply-To: <445F64BF.7030903@pobox.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: seamonkey -- building calendar (option) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:13:46 -0000 martinko wrote: > hello! > > i've just upgraded from mozilla (1.7.12) to seamonkey (1.0.1) and > discovered the following issue: > > there's WITH_CALENDAR make switch in the port which is/was supposed to > turn building of mozilla with calendar module. i've been happily using > it with mozilla suite. the switch is still in seamonkey's makefile but i > haven't got calendar module after compilation of the port. :-( > > /note that i'm running seamonkey on freebsd 6.1-rc, after just > reinstalling all my ports from scratch./ > > any thoughts or suggestions pls ?? > Check their site --- something jars my memory. Any chance they're "splitting off" the calendar under another name? Just a guess, Kevin Kinsey -- Education is learning what you didn't even know you didn't know. -- Daniel J. Boorstin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 16:24:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7090816A46C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68CA43D4C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:24:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13138) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Fd8Wd-000OgF-TN; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:23:59 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD95581111; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from http.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F62E581110; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amandla.biko8b.scii.nl (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A1B58C6BE; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:24:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 18:23:51 +0200 From: albi To: "Bryan Curl" Message-Id: <20060508182351.bfcf3c8e.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <51257d370605080910r5b499936mb15fd6122023c04f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507054134.GA1693@rebelion.Sisis.de> <51257d370605080614u76e7930bha35d96cae8cc0396@mail.gmail.com> <20060508152330.0973bd4c.albi@scii.nl> <51257d370605080910r5b499936mb15fd6122023c04f@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: scrappy@hub.org, Matthias.Apitz@sisis.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:24:07 -0000 On Mon, 8 May 2006 10:10:24 -0600 "Bryan Curl" wrote: > If that just fixes From in the header Im not sure that is entirely my > problem. > Since my bounces seem to be related to my localhost domain name, I > wonder about a setting like described here from sendmail's manual. > > You can have your host masquerade as another using > MASQUERADE_AS(`host.domain') > > This causes mail being sent to be labeled as coming from the indicated > host.domain, rather than $j. hmm, ok, sorry, i always make sure my postfix-settings are correct, and i just remembered the problem of having the From-address correct in mutt some years ago glad to see you apparently have it all sorted out now :) -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 16:44:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9CF16A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:44:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EC143D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:44:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so880030wxc for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 09:44:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Xockg86yptu4p9kba1P75K83UQPxKRYT2KrJRn7FS0NSV/wVmBQgIig0N7rg5DwXonw40NveQSHuTdHz3u9g0CTI+H/PCVxHR15wazFhzH6MFoE1+mjAHA1YLgFgcnXdN7sHmhtk7r75oscgaUJ0USfVAqo/Dmnlf+v4Bk4+MUM= Received: by 10.70.27.15 with SMTP id a15mr1490492wxa; Mon, 08 May 2006 09:44:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.115.11 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:44:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:44:41 -0400 From: "Marty Landman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:44:42 -0000 I've just reinstalled FBSD 4.8 from the mini-iso on an old box (PII-133 w/ = 3 GB on two hd's). The problem I'm running into is that my ports are looking for old, outdated packages, I think. So going from http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.htmlt= ried to install cvsup to do a port upgrade: mrwilhelm# pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.8-release/Latest/cv= sup-without-gui.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch ' ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.8-release/Latest/cv= sup-without-gui.tgz' by URL mrwilhelm# Same problem though, how can I tell my system where to get access to the 4.8stuff? Marty -- Web Installed Formmail - http://face2interface.com/formINSTal/ Webmaster's BBS - http://bbs.face2interface.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 16:53:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A267A16A402; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cypher@skynet.ie) Received: from holly.csn.ul.ie (holly.csn.ul.ie [193.1.99.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788DB43D46; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:53:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cypher@skynet.ie) Received: from [193.1.99.74] (unknown [193.1.99.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by holly.csn.ul.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D7712FC1; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:53:54 +0100 (IST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:53:54 +0100 (IST) From: Cypher To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/Mixed; BOUNDARY="----=_Part_4617_9010508.1145532547769" Content-ID: Cc: Subject: University of Limerick Computer Society X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:53:57 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ------=_Part_4617_9010508.1145532547769 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: To whom it may concern, We the University of Limerick Computer Society have begun preparations with regard to the organisation of the "SkyCon"event in Friday 16th to Sunday 18th February 2007. SkyCon is a conference designed to fully explore world views on the future of computer development and to discuss the rampant and tumultuous effect that computing has had on society at large. Attached you shall find a full invitation which provides a more detailed abstract of what the event entails. I look forward to both seeing you at the event and to any future correspondence we have with regard to it. Please feel free to contact me with regard this issue at your earliest convenience. Kind Regards Laura Czajkowski ------------------------------ President, UL Computer Society www.skynet.ie ------=_Part_4617_9010508.1145532547769 Content-Type: APPLICATION/PDF; NAME=skycon.pdf Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME=skycon.pdf JVBERi0xLjQNJeLjz9MNCjYgMCBvYmo8PC9IWzMxMTYgMzQ4XS9MaW5lYXJpemVkIDEvRSA0NTI1 MS9MIDQ5MTkxL04gMS9PIDkvVCA0OTAyNT4+DWVuZG9iag0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg DQp4cmVmDQo2IDE0MQ0KMDAwMDAwMDAxNiAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDAzNDY0IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAw MDAwMDMxMTYgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwMzU0MCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDAzNzE3IDAwMDAwIG4N CjAwMDAwMDUwMDIgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNTA0NSAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDA1MDg3IDAwMDAw IG4NCjAwMDAwMDUxMzEgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNTE3NCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDA1MjE3IDAw MDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDUyNjAgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNTMwMyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDA1MzQ2 IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDUzODkgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNTQzMiAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDA1 NDc1IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDU1MTggMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNTU2MSAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAw MDA1NjA0IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDU2NDcgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNTY5MCAwMDAwMCBuDQow MDAwMDA1NzMzIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDU3NzYgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNTgxOSAwMDAwMCBu DQowMDAwMDA1ODYyIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDU5MDUgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNTk0OCAwMDAw MCBuDQowMDAwMDA1OTkxIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDYwMzQgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNjA3NyAw MDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDA2MTIwIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDY3MjggMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAwNzIz MCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDA3MjY0IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDc0MjcgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAw Nzc4OSAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDA4MTc1IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMDg2NzYgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAw MDAwOTQxMCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDEwMjU4IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMTExNDEgMDAwMDAgbg0K MDAwMDAxMTk0MCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDEyMzMyIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMTMwODIgMDAwMDAg bg0KMDAwMDAxMzY5MyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDE2MzYyIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMTY0NzIgMDAw MDAgbg0KMDAwMDAxNjY0NCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDE2ODMzIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMTcwMTMg MDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAxNzE4NSAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDE3MzgyIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMTc1 OTEgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAxNzgwMyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDE3OTg3IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAw MTgxODMgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAxODM5MCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDE4NTYxIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAw MDAwMTg2NzcgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAxODc5NiAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDE4OTI0IDAwMDAwIG4N CjAwMDAwMTkwMjggMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAxOTE1MCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDE5MzA3IDAwMDAw IG4NCjAwMDAwMTk0ODEgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAxOTY4MiAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDE5OTIyIDAw MDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjAwMjMgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyMDEzMCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDIwNDY1 IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjA1MjQgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyMDYzMyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDIw ODcyIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjExMDggMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyMTM0MCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAw MDIxNTg1IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjE4NDAgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyMjAxNCAwMDAwMCBuDQow MDAwMDIyMjA5IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjI0MTMgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyMjYyNiAwMDAwMCBu DQowMDAwMDIyODQ1IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjMwNjEgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyMzI4NyAwMDAw MCBuDQowMDAwMDIzNTUzIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjM4MTUgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyNDA3OCAw MDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDI0MzQyIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjQ2MjYgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyNDg5 OSAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDI1MTcxIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjU0NTUgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAy NTcyNCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDI1OTkxIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjYyNTggMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAw MDAyNjQ3NiAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDI2NzM5IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjY5NzggMDAwMDAgbg0K MDAwMDAyNzIzOCAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDI3NTAzIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjc3NTcgMDAwMDAg bg0KMDAwMDAyODAxNyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDI4Mjc2IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjg1NDggMDAw MDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyODgyMSAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDI5MDk4IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMjkzNTEg MDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAyOTYyMSAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDI5ODkyIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMzAx NjIgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzMDQ2MyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDMwNzk0IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAw MzExMjQgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzMTQ2NiAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDMxNzkxIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAw MDAwMzIxNjYgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzMjQ5NiAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDMyNzcxIDAwMDAwIG4N CjAwMDAwMzMwNDcgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzMzMyOSAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDMzNjAyIDAwMDAw IG4NCjAwMDAwMzM4NzEgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzNDE1MyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDM0NDI3IDAw MDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMzQ2OTYgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzNDk2NyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDM1MjM5 IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMzU1MTkgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzNTg1MyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDM2 NDEwIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMzY2NDggMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzNjk3MiAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAw MDM3Mjk4IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMzc1NTkgMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzNzgwNSAwMDAwMCBuDQow MDAwMDM4MDMyIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwMzgyMzggMDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDAzODQyMiAwMDAwMCBu DQowMDAwMDQwNzIzIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwNDUxNzQgMDAwMDAgbg0KdHJhaWxlcg0KPDwvU2l6 ZSAxNDcvUHJldiA0OTAxNS9Sb290IDcgMCBSL0luZm8gNSAwIFIvSURbPDY4MDIzMzYyNGRkYzJk MTFmMTg0MzRhMzU5MTllOTY2Pjw5MmIzNzQ1ZDRiMzU1ZTRmOWFkMTQwMGE4ZTlkYjhmYz5dPj4N CnN0YXJ0eHJlZg0KMA0KJSVFT0YNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgDQo4IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDI2 OS9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvTCAzMjAvUyA1Mz4+c3RyZWFtDQp42mJgYOhiYOCpYACCRe8Z UAEbELMwcDSgCCopqSHxuqAYKM7Ay1JpcUCIoYGVQYVRgZPBg8lBiGECSwMOzkR59gAGhkYuhwjm ZdoHp/O6xC9ME0uYEDKN5YArU46QQxerhPbBFM6EQKYtggpBTCvEG3pYG2ybDEQenGOSEHKKYpyg 2mwi6XCMbYa5owSXQCjTGXGFbWwMVown+AKKmV/IPnjHfsHq4CW+CTHMUyQXPGK3MGc8widQzrxH LuE2e4K14w2BDVNaFqg1KnOt8GJ8xK9Qw7xHNuEHe4PVwVt8D6pZNjgmnOEU8GQ8xuuQ0LRB6MTt Lg6uAwzYACMDw/p0IM0ExBYAAQYAzp1Kow0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag03IDAgb2JqPDwvUGFn ZXMgMyAwIFIvVHlwZS9DYXRhbG9nL1BhZ2VMYWJlbHMgMSAwIFIvTWV0YWRhdGEgNCAwIFI+Pg1l bmRvYmoNOSAwIG9iajw8L0NvbnRlbnRzWzM3IDAgUiAzOCAwIFIgNDQgMCBSIDQ1IDAgUiA0NiAw IFIgNDcgMCBSIDQ5IDAgUiA1MCAwIFJdL1R5cGUvUGFnZS9QYXJlbnQgMyAwIFIvUm90YXRlIDAv TWVkaWFCb3hbMCAwIDYxMiA3OTJdL0Nyb3BCb3hbMCAwIDYxMiA3OTJdL1Jlc291cmNlcyAxMCAw IFI+Pg1lbmRvYmoNMTAgMCBvYmo8PC9Db2xvclNwYWNlPDwvQ3M2IDM5IDAgUi9DczggMzYgMCBS L0NzOSAzNSAwIFIvQ3MxMCAzNCAwIFIvQ3MxMSAzMyAwIFIvQ3MxMiAzMiAwIFIvQ3MxMyAzMSAw IFIvQ3MxNCAzMCAwIFIvQ3MxNSAyOSAwIFIvQ3MxNiAyOCAwIFIvQ3MxNyAyNyAwIFIvQ3MxOCAy NiAwIFIvQ3MxOSAyNSAwIFIvQ3MyMCAyNCAwIFIvQ3MyMSAyMyAwIFIvQ3MyMiAyMiAwIFIvQ3My MyAyMSAwIFIvQ3MyNCAyMCAwIFIvQ3MyNSAxOSAwIFIvQ3MyNiAxOCAwIFIvQ3MyNyAxNyAwIFIv Q3MyOCAxNiAwIFIvQ3MyOSAxNSAwIFIvQ3MzMCAxNCAwIFIvQ3MzMSAxMyAwIFIvQ3MzMiAxMiAw IFIvQ3MzMyAxMSAwIFI+Pi9Gb250PDwvVFQyIDQzIDAgUi9UVDQgNDIgMCBSL1RUNiA0MSAwIFIv VFQ4IDQwIDAgUi9UVDEwIDQ4IDAgUj4+L1hPYmplY3Q8PC9JbTEgODMgMCBSL0ltMiA4NCAwIFIv SW0zIDg1IDAgUi9JbTQgODYgMCBSL0ltNSA4NyAwIFIvSW02IDg4IDAgUi9JbTcgODkgMCBSL0lt OCA5MCAwIFIvSW05IDkxIDAgUi9JbTEwIDkyIDAgUi9JbTExIDkzIDAgUi9JbTEyIDk0IDAgUi9J bTEzIDk1IDAgUi9JbTE0IDk2IDAgUi9JbTE1IDk3IDAgUi9JbTE2IDk4IDAgUi9JbTE3IDk5IDAg Ui9JbTE4IDEwMCAwIFIvSW0xOSAxMDEgMCBSL0ltMjAgMTAyIDAgUi9JbTIxIDEwMyAwIFIvSW0y MiAxMDQgMCBSL0ltMjMgMTA1IDAgUi9JbTI0IDEwNiAwIFIvSW0yNSAxMDcgMCBSL0ltMjYgMTA4 IDAgUi9JbTI3IDEwOSAwIFIvSW0yOCAxMTAgMCBSL0ltMjkgMTExIDAgUi9JbTMwIDExMiAwIFIv SW0zMSAxMTMgMCBSL0ltMzIgMTE0IDAgUi9JbTMzIDExNSAwIFIvSW0zNCAxMTYgMCBSL0ltMzUg MTE3IDAgUi9JbTM2IDExOCAwIFIvSW0zNyAxMTkgMCBSL0ltMzggMTIwIDAgUi9JbTM5IDEyMSAw IFIvSW00MCAxMjIgMCBSL0ltNDEgMTIzIDAgUi9JbTQyIDEyNCAwIFIvSW00MyAxMjUgMCBSL0lt NDQgMTI2IDAgUi9JbTQ1IDEyNyAwIFIvSW00NiAxMjggMCBSL0ltNDcgMTI5IDAgUi9JbTQ4IDEz MCAwIFIvSW00OSAxMzEgMCBSL0ltNTAgMTMyIDAgUi9JbTUxIDEzMyAwIFIvSW01MiAxMzQgMCBS L0ltNTMgMTM1IDAgUi9JbTU0IDEzNiAwIFIvSW01NSAxMzcgMCBSL0ltNTYgMTM4IDAgUi9JbTU3 IDEzOSAwIFIvSW01OCAxNDAgMCBSL0ltNTkgMTQxIDAgUi9JbTYwIDE0MiAwIFIvSW02MSAxNDMg MCBSL0ltNjIgMTQ0IDAgUi9JbTYzIDE0NSAwIFI+Pi9Qcm9jU2V0Wy9QREYvVGV4dC9JbWFnZUMv SW1hZ2VJXS9FeHRHU3RhdGU8PC9HUzEgMTQ2IDAgUj4+Pj4NZW5kb2JqDTExIDAgb2JqWy9JbmRl eGVkIDM5IDAgUiAxNSA3NyAwIFJdDWVuZG9iag0xMiAwIG9ialsvSW5kZXhlZCAzOSAwIFIgMiA3 NiAwIFJdDWVuZG9iag0xMyAwIG9ialsvSW5kZXhlZCAzOSAwIFIgMjU1IDc1IDAgUl0NZW5kb2Jq DTE0IDAgb2JqWy9JbmRleGVkIDM5IDAgUiAxOCA3NCAwIFJdDWVuZG9iag0xNSAwIG9ialsvSW5k ZXhlZCAzOSAwIFIgMTYgNzMgMCBSXQ1lbmRvYmoNMTYgMCBvYmpbL0luZGV4ZWQgMzkgMCBSIDU0 IDcyIDAgUl0NZW5kb2JqDTE3IDAgb2JqWy9JbmRleGVkIDM5IDAgUiAzOCA3MSAwIFJdDWVuZG9i ag0xOCAwIG9ialsvSW5kZXhlZCAzOSAwIFIgMzAgNzAgMCBSXQ1lbmRvYmoNMTkgMCBvYmpbL0lu ZGV4ZWQgMzkgMCBSIDI2IDY5IDAgUl0NZW5kb2JqDTIwIDAgb2JqWy9JbmRleGVkIDM5IDAgUiAy MyA2OCAwIFJdDWVuZG9iag0yMSAwIG9ialsvSW5kZXhlZCAzOSAwIFIgMTcgNjcgMCBSXQ1lbmRv YmoNMjIgMCBvYmpbL0luZGV4ZWQgMzkgMCBSIDI1IDY2IDAgUl0NZW5kb2JqDTIzIDAgb2JqWy9J bmRleGVkIDM5IDAgUiAyMiA2NSAwIFJdDWVuZG9iag0yNCAwIG9ialsvSW5kZXhlZCAzOSAwIFIg MjEgNjQgMCBSXQ1lbmRvYmoNMjUgMCBvYmpbL0luZGV4ZWQgMzkgMCBSIDI5IDYzIDAgUl0NZW5k b2JqDTI2IDAgb2JqWy9JbmRleGVkIDM5IDAgUiA0MCA2MiAwIFJdDWVuZG9iag0yNyAwIG9ialsv SW5kZXhlZCAzOSAwIFIgMzcgNjEgMCBSXQ1lbmRvYmoNMjggMCBvYmpbL0luZGV4ZWQgMzkgMCBS IDM1IDYwIDAgUl0NZW5kb2JqDTI5IDAgb2JqWy9JbmRleGVkIDM5IDAgUiA0MyA1OSAwIFJdDWVu ZG9iag0zMCAwIG9ialsvSW5kZXhlZCAzOSAwIFIgNDIgNTggMCBSXQ1lbmRvYmoNMzEgMCBvYmpb L0luZGV4ZWQgMzkgMCBSIDM5IDU3IDAgUl0NZW5kb2JqDTMyIDAgb2JqWy9JbmRleGVkIDM5IDAg UiAzMCA1NiAwIFJdDWVuZG9iag0zMyAwIG9ialsvSW5kZXhlZCAzOSAwIFIgMzMgNTUgMCBSXQ1l bmRvYmoNMzQgMCBvYmpbL0luZGV4ZWQgMzkgMCBSIDM2IDU0IDAgUl0NZW5kb2JqDTM1IDAgb2Jq Wy9JbmRleGVkIDM5IDAgUiAzMSA1MyAwIFJdDWVuZG9iag0zNiAwIG9ialsvSW5kZXhlZCAzOSAw IFIgMTkgNTIgMCBSXQ1lbmRvYmoNMzcgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNTM5L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURl Y29kZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiWSUwY4UMQxE7/0VOSPhtR3bSe5IiCPiwAcghDgsaNn/l6hkOtl0b+9h Vpl+43K54pdD0u90SKvUIhWvVFIRUk0fLVOx9O/n8f1D+nM8ff4m6dfr8XKYkETi/kemSbVRltYK QC/UKjNOfzwfT1+eJX36e3ztjBE3PHXngnLB2cA8mL2dmC6sEGe8UnYsk+GsPsqJMYufXF4c2pA7 J1QcR71eUFHmPGXa5ByvMh7dOSYuZz0oxrc2dfrihGK3RCrVaYlThSU8NcZi8tBzsURi6K4xOIMn OjWWxRn53UpBEWjEuDrH6CFPjXVxeMdvnohR9HrA8B8s8TixtrCg6OXyjkF6t8QGB4xlTZwXiKHe ZydKbc4OvwFfdOqUlRVkcOTiBvb8lBhghjE2lcpKizfSPnXbQWR5Th3FbQz3BFdcAiN+Nwp8dGvy AF03zjbOdoYbjcn4YAS1cpnQykoIZb1CguK1DwExgiduE1phCb3eOa5vdw4dwg+ZTNkYLzc7uFBt px1MFXboUlg3sLfRZkHMuYNWHkmBWXhiFVxRiUw1b9woiPjkR1SskaM7mQV1RSVsDKn5FdTzKgAU dJinLSobGOUWTnbqR93PvgbQok+puqIS/n4fAcznJQKYe6yX1LyBft8sbNT8EU4srNYjtqTaBvbo X3u0cUVKHaDtm1Pf8hLjsmFPbmAel7LqAHntzpQ6Gin9F2AAz5wx0Q0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9i ag0zOCAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCA0MzMvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJjJQ9 ckIxDIR7TuETKLJ+LKtPkzJnSM1kcv8msnk2dsKbeTBDAXzsSrvi/fv2efu5FYPs8bCE7QlCiZCB zL1KMilQBDFr+rrf3j7uZOl9gqWReoDxbUKCqgFqgAoVEcUHWCdYATlAXhUJJN6r1kFu5FT0BRRt XncQw4U1qwJeEIkOkHEBqz257jRD+ykrncsUemVweXIO5H9HzJDjt6w5jTWFUxojMi2gtd3ICiJY SJoHGNPGUnE65QEaQm67oQ5moNJBbrvJAYZ4KKoMUBZQ20C1gwQ5hT54vFROxg4YXLbB6cJ5W005 BEvtoPgjRTboRqdgmWDunyDtINojRVawcM5zRDtTjBE3RQHZUqyvR5yKc0YC29Lwi0vlqAI9wxC8 mCJjWFjCkKu9IY93QnCkIfSyqIfRZ1Gpgq4pCl+8jABz7JSnUzm7xeOIxy2SAcfIOBX1qmIBX3sj 5eQWO7eMWEBiRJlh2NlOD3DutADGiDrSl3oxRVKgtahyUpsJjtqQ7P9Tiq+L2sG1qMSgET8Pq5ov ngbR/n+jvTcp/T9HApftHLMDz8qlXwEGAGfhOVcNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMzkgMCBvYmpb L0lDQ0Jhc2VkIDUxIDAgUl0NZW5kb2JqDTQwIDAgb2JqPDwvVHlwZS9Gb250L0VuY29kaW5nL1dp bkFuc2lFbmNvZGluZy9CYXNlRm9udC9UaW1lc05ld1JvbWFuUFMtQm9sZE1UL0ZpcnN0Q2hhciAz Mi9MYXN0Q2hhciAzMi9TdWJ0eXBlL1RydWVUeXBlL0ZvbnREZXNjcmlwdG9yIDgxIDAgUi9XaWR0 aHNbMjUwXT4+DWVuZG9iag00MSAwIG9iajw8L1R5cGUvRm9udC9FbmNvZGluZy9XaW5BbnNpRW5j b2RpbmcvQmFzZUZvbnQvQ291cmllck5ld1BTTVQvRmlyc3RDaGFyIDMyL0xhc3RDaGFyIDEyMS9T dWJ0eXBlL1RydWVUeXBlL0ZvbnREZXNjcmlwdG9yIDgwIDAgUi9XaWR0aHNbNjAwIDAgMCAwIDAg MCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgNjAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCA2 MDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAg MCAwIDAgMCAwIDYwMCAwIDYwMCAwIDYwMCAwIDAgMCA2MDAgMCA2MDAgNjAwIDAgNjAwIDAgMCAw IDAgNjAwIDYwMCA2MDAgMCA2MDAgMCA2MDBdPj4NZW5kb2JqDTQyIDAgb2JqPDwvVHlwZS9Gb250 L0VuY29kaW5nL1dpbkFuc2lFbmNvZGluZy9CYXNlRm9udC9BcmlhbC1JdGFsaWNNVC9GaXJzdENo YXIgMzIvTGFzdENoYXIgMTIxL1N1YnR5cGUvVHJ1ZVR5cGUvRm9udERlc2NyaXB0b3IgNzkgMCBS L1dpZHRoc1syNzggMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDI3OCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAw IDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDcyMiAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMjc4IDAgMCA1NTYgMCAwIDc3 OCAwIDAgMCA2NjcgMCA3MjIgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDU1NiA1NTYgNTAwIDU1NiA1 NTYgMjc4IDAgMCAyMjIgMCA1MDAgMjIyIDgzMyA1NTYgNTU2IDU1NiAwIDMzMyA1MDAgMjc4IDU1 NiA1MDAgMCAwIDUwMF0+Pg1lbmRvYmoNNDMgMCBvYmo8PC9UeXBlL0ZvbnQvRW5jb2RpbmcvV2lu QW5zaUVuY29kaW5nL0Jhc2VGb250L1RpbWVzTmV3Um9tYW5QU01UL0ZpcnN0Q2hhciAzMi9MYXN0 Q2hhciAxNDYvU3VidHlwZS9UcnVlVHlwZS9Gb250RGVzY3JpcHRvciA3OCAwIFIvV2lkdGhzWzI1 MCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDMzMyAzMzMgMCAwIDI1MCAwIDI1MCAyNzggNTAwIDUwMCA1MDAgNTAw IDUwMCA1MDAgNTAwIDUwMCA1MDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgNDQ0IDAgNzIyIDY2NyA2NjcgNzIyIDAg NTU2IDcyMiAwIDMzMyAwIDAgNjExIDg4OSA3MjIgNzIyIDU1NiAwIDAgNTU2IDYxMSA3MjIgMCA5 NDQgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgNDQ0IDUwMCA0NDQgNTAwIDQ0NCAzMzMgNTAwIDUwMCAyNzgg Mjc4IDUwMCAyNzggNzc4IDUwMCA1MDAgNTAwIDAgMzMzIDM4OSAyNzggNTAwIDUwMCA3MjIgNTAw IDUwMCA0NDQgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDMz M10+Pg1lbmRvYmoNNDQgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNjY1L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZT4+c3Ry ZWFtDQpIiYxUy27bMBC86yt4JAuL5vtxbBOgSBGgCKKcih5SxS7UxHZquS3y950lJccBmiIQQPEx Mzu7S2l5sfGWne+aq+ZnE5XMMeccmKJHJsd0ztJhK3kWdZKe9ZtmCY474XhPgInjTOFkDMkWjkpK 6TgT/QlRWxDNM9EoJS32kgYxyhCUsm4mhpkYkkzk8pSnJXmIofCMU8rrmRePvCwjXGX3MmAEM2YQ g0xYq6PT9JpTlOWFUy8zUoTcRMxvrY2XHikCX4lBvbURTkY4sHPEoCvxqll+vNbs+wgJE+ycGmk4 rGxJ3kDcWNImnQwD5qhjqs6Hrll2Hcyybt1oLU2aUpjn3joJ33mSYB3oZ2Ng/VgNs7HfNop1PQ1/ Gs5E94MkXZVEJiYWXJ1ZHyQaHZWRtogpCVeB+C1NlSOVL/xGeBn4VsCG48Pv1R4zPg6HJxGkQZA2 YH9Xj9cC9cYelPnlxBCtw2sjEtAr4fl+6O/ZWRHdiVYDWc8eK/4XIIciU8DCAceuJ/1+WB2PKb7m C4wJEb92n5A25LTDpe3OazbxORtfs2FkDhbJQOQPwkADITF+oxCej1NGt3W5LWd3dTEdVTe+usEp +fEci0ngs9BkcL0ekBhgFbWoJrt3xZq2pVHkLL90xmr52A1St4iPO0RlJ02NelhsovqQ9CgBLgJn uzW7HDZC09Gq4KnGiwI5rYw3c2FUmqNr9+/o8+oMegnFsOjQKKiTB2qa4w8rkdGaw373tKjhDYCr AtwPoAfeizYBeS9agz7517qk4tGM/7+Z+p7G9nlxsSczHu2kGt1u72qkk8+JfhzK1s9pmjvjJT7C YDNd/uOV7xvGaB6qFYMqZq6KMHv/uB8e8BsSLV0eQOYwgbG/AgwA6wE7Pg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVu ZG9iag00NSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCA3NzkvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJ jFTLctMwFN37K+5SWlhIsuTYOwbCogzDwNSsaBep6xKTxC6209C/51zJbjJlmCFdWI/7OI+rGqoe klI5uyKNv7gyRqvcUeZVUVB1SLTy2pQ5vf6OdZekWmltEFYnmqpT8l2cTieZ5ioTatw9d82k2obk bfUx4QYmJJlc2SzPsK/WyJg2+934dtzFtDknpHyoEptnakVZpqyjwqmc2ztTlgUNTfKQvKv+gp+5 QmX5/8HXDFyQrH4izLrCRkwXrFYq176I1AjcVD126rhXDNaJGeebqrLgBi11ABJIelUWhYkF9YtA sRmI/UpcaZTR+OUhya6sKvHLS/KlKsCxtGSdUzbX2nqqD8mbqwNkW/fJVyaOrkXs+g8HgVw5liA2 PaPEdZbpLGQs6znHl9A7PydpSg1qspTr85GFWKY8S+UCP6VzH5W6kqmHlyRhgtjI1OFzkJkqBU0y LZQVW+mww2ikHFIfh0GmBnqIppvoy9BgBzxiRBhkvme5V+Guf6Bp28SSsf43rmFFJ4GlFO3THDtE DGM7PaOYVV5w7qc29j8s99hbtKh39L6f4w4S+ovHWOc4LZF03dexbwsqTswgpljgpcmN4BfAiE6S KfA7wB2GUnRLCgb8RsaqmKQViGDMmU98KJDceB8kZ3kxIEFekxWzvp+b3zIH2Ykx2lkH7sIvqNkM dBWPtv1jQ1NPdbNv7obN1FDPCMAqpA9kfNzTcxDcc/IoebSp7SIcg5nKM3PxMrRZ8GBCAx60QfW2 Z0oOTmguEM0fYVc8jmaXopeMeS+Zpbif76Rlr6ZogmGDZBiHx3jPLtA1pEJUH8rXbROMNS/8Wxaj 5DnwoT2DTxf0ryTFewKFwAbvJc7sEGatCYO5lwZibMK6Y4MLcU8nbD3a8NW0pQ3AAiXeC6PkkDAr XAQ3nSxw8sCQ7Vx0btDVcate7Lb8/9C80peI135Gtz4OC78fC0EmjbfACyDeQL1wNAtwjJ+D5Cm7 g3yY/kWw4LJn308NbTdPlybEchemcc1Z+p28pT8CDADjkWf+DQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTQ2 IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDgxNC9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGU+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlcVMlu2zAQ vfsr5kgBkWBK1nZsE6Bo0AIF4qCHIgdaZizBimSQstP8Rr+4s5BOm4tEDmd7j2+4vV/pNlvXRQtr 2N6t0nW2Xuew7Va0qCvYvq5+qbck1UWm1YT/rFR2gW2SVlmjTLLONmo8+iStcQtJid8Hm6Qlmt0Q Fniaqxt4pV2j+mSTFco6zKWzWll4DW7QG7bl6mJxvaecRcg52k6cliRtcH92tG3VfxUooMKAp+39 Ko2wsGNdlg2BI0hXcBtaEbgXzNGql511HuZn+Io7xDglFX73lF6rM2/84oiINZYFM+3ZBoLpIH4u yfFr/otCTAVCWixnf/yWpBtqcieH3VHSLMRnpWbksw6QFzOK8fhvpXn6EMClTmwcEry+RnU+nvZy apMGOXrv3SHnszsOkxwfYJ5gdqFAby4xihsXOtfC45XFIrBY6lpYNLC39iSdD1RdKKwQuCNGN5JP I4uQ4CVXapgyKhRveNuHMI8coLHnaBOC4MRbR1tEfbF7uLDFIuW1oospQyJPWUtmv1JdZ71/Zggo iFrnjeicBFC20rp4jkRerWJPDydrjrF1jx463oA/d31YGg8/HN6q7O7MJUDYc0b4Ydxk/A18Z+ab yMD4rlBu6KNCdRy/spQGv8zcR6VeEhK7mW4E6afREMc4Obesg1z9lgNUJy1aaokduDKi+jmMHi+7 Z6OhpFpFj5xkZcYRdtZOEn44S1pLl8bYT8FA3Hix9cHECVBaIoHQ2OO3TK7jKqM8yze6DWAbLQi3 NBW1kr4GD6RVel+scbDMgd/OjlZa3rGfM4uFh+Ob1J9QNiiH5Y9Q5RlAiNQlD0QsEKyfBzG6Rcx7 SWRwWgoVO8DXCYflzA6j+O9hDJFHCyHxzNWvu1MosUREtMXB3l3T9rNfhukg/WutbmV25ymDpNE8 FU8A75Mn+kj/FYjO4/vM9LWMLif6pPjrLI/jmc3cfIvN7ywY6ObpWdSNJE9dwBFTmIUwxwg2QYds O3i+vhMmPn3OmhBMEihUdJjOUv5lJ3+MxlE5nElMXl7vE6e2LMSC37k8JpHW6BaRtuBAqo61n+Cv AAMAS4mUIA0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag00NyAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCA3MzAvRmlsdGVyL0Zs YXRlRGVjb2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJXFRNb9swDL3nV/AoD7UrKf7KecOAFrslww7DDkqs1EZSObDl Bvv3o0TKDXaSRFF8fOSjDq8bCbkqVAWHbxtZSCk1HE64U7JUcLhvfourmd6yuqiEnSDLq6IVZgmr Et1g3ckW8ML2+7hcs7wuatFBP94s+DE+5OvefKCJHPpMFo0YZhgcuXy3Wb4Tx3iYcIvLEg8my7eF FtPfLFey2AnQUsaLhsMSxgelZPkt+J5yhhPdL9Ns04MzGLjbCHghL8eEirCWmPCfw+vm8GWTx5KU XJK6rakkh+CmkUSFCaWwnfEWejMHghpDBJsbPRytdTBbJN6s9kBGBeBMC/8EZibzCy33MQZerl1c U/nGW9g0ATCc/Yjc3HmY3pEsVjLicyN69nQUIDXoEo+OLgnkHsuqhHuEeiN8DsKMVgKhNqyaqv1f N7JSLRVpvllz4a5kGns+IctAuxZzVgvW0KmnFWuARsYP5aljiql1V+zZlOixZlhKHNzO6dzBQDsX RQYmZqyaom23W5Cccb0tKU/vresGVgApvaAKwy9EjAnfSVWcTxI5KTcqnTpCdhZ9n+S7Q3HW1Oyi ZgEMHsiNcRlnb/zyOAJdZGCwHlrHQQpM8kRlHVySacMdkLIiZgaDh1ncL64LuxBnrbEP6q2jeiO0 ikeZYSwtnkOvK7apNDdp/lXzjE3Goye3nh5ZIDGVwtpLQMK6fo6c7y3okgPrGLiid58+8RNA5R2n xUw0Iy0NfHBviD5gC3Nd6LJpP7kr5r4tm3VES4wUmqDDP0MY9oMG3DoP6bfaxUauaRwtYENdqtJI d+bKvvDzB0WGvSfL0lmX8YBgQ0TCMo6wOkpbI1WlWX+UdJ2SrjQlvY8FLYNoSnEOOJU4Pz1+KPFm LStmBV/pyRhqqcT7Lc7VjpKp438YosB+JPtpsCGEH+wcxiQ8dfSUvyDynzJVbIW9PuTDbh3FQVLw T4ABAEo5b/cNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNNDggMCBvYmo8PC9UeXBlL0ZvbnQvRW5jb2Rpbmcv V2luQW5zaUVuY29kaW5nL0Jhc2VGb250L1RpbWVzTmV3Um9tYW5QUy1JdGFsaWNNVC9GaXJzdENo YXIgMzIvTGFzdENoYXIgMTIxL1N1YnR5cGUvVHJ1ZVR5cGUvRm9udERlc2NyaXB0b3IgODIgMCBS L1dpZHRoc1syNTAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAzMzMgMzMzIDAgMCAyNTAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAw IDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCA2NjcgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDU1NiAwIDAg MCAwIDAgMCA1MDAgMCA3MjIgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDUwMCA1MDAgNDQ0IDAgNDQ0 IDI3OCAwIDUwMCAyNzggMCA0NDQgMjc4IDcyMiA1MDAgNTAwIDUwMCAwIDM4OSAwIDI3OCA1MDAg MCAwIDAgNDQ0XT4+DWVuZG9iag00OSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCA2ODEvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVj b2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJbFRLb9swDL7nV/BoAbFgS36eN2BoMWAFGmCHYQfVUWsjiW34UWP/fqQo Oe2wk0SKj48fSZ0eD7FKpEqVhjiVaZYpOH09JHBqDolM0hLF7fArMjNs9noFEeeyIsnswjrbyV/f pmEd52DUn0UhdbSLf0ScYopo6C1s7fDxcRvWq4gLvHmflvQ6MkLJLHpnwToBTA8d2/bOdrGTnZe7 LpF5BEtrfehlGLtmlgDw8AqCNISjkHXECFbYBo6/OnnHwWBB/D49Ih9ETp5XjhyZJEnBDKWqqJmh F8sQFEIgR4ZlMU4mywg6AluHeueR1dZcnBo9E6ytZ+2b9zELPPM7Q9bRFywgRwKPPs54tWZGiwzJ iStZeLhpJfMszyDZ4dYerlYZw70JgmpErDBgF3p5s0zRi2kuokQD2LqlxW51DQfGEFlR3QOrwINO Sg7ciorqtO9W5NEkMurGRnd7sb17O8PgzgmLol4bfKRpogSxwipqpZhvyhJTmkyHNGXBaTBkXBKD fFyEomuqMV2Pd6S9RjpmYpKmzE2CbynOlqaBZM+Fm++mgFxoEEnhI4APsbJTx4/BKYw2255DV9h2 4MMH8IcP8OKzYGNVSjw7hAZ8YO86fkra0IC5CnrWh6bt6jPrJaVKw/NPTxFsNCIq+lCn8/JO0O6o 6XkMXv+l7nP9m4WGrUNsNgtMht+BtdQm7P5yXzCAf1fMNT1JfdOLSnPTz93crG5wZwpZR3Pndjdz XwFqYRdpnQB33+ndYtZRE76meW1aNgQTdD/Y1PZefh7WqbFHEsr7WpW4Vx/WKiAstf8FHpiAm0hp tEfydlumqX8LDG5XX0P7KM+3p++87u/6yJrn4XXZzGThySy2X2ZBlQJ/p5n72lw9JS1Qve98HNDt mwN/BRgAlZlWsA0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag01MCAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCA1NDIvRmlsdGVy L0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJVFNNb9swDL37V/AoAZMmyV/xqYduAzoU2CEedlh3cBO5 dhNHhWM3y379SNFut5NM8pl871Ey2hjjoN4lRluTWagvyU/RS1XoQgwy17l4aXYTBKlybcVJFpiB L1KV4pt02ont9gaothF3LVylskZXIkijSzEzuItHI1WK8D003GOFQpg6P8J55gFPsfjEgT9PfTid 5a/6a+KstlVVgoH6U6IM0bZvtDOmDWGEfu+bM9wtnC4B+zkxH0lQJfYxWmrH/uBhCkvU+WaEdkSd 1iJmkHhYERVRHGZNuBJ/xnkkK7JSKy2FZ55v3smxp8zrh4fYpkA+RKWMROxKpIvmotEx6cmoQrwz 2y3l16VMro9EjJJhHmEapapQXfPqj+B/L808GqcK9JAcj6n/hja7te8whLVudCoa9JzjU8TrhToL NqBwfmYrUmpIIxbq56TSmaPlGOAvi8stMnAW91hAPbAr6bIy3F3K1tzjvciQTlx/JVAJ2d7ALaUz 8YerzTOVU3EIDLucDz1nmNXHurYGsHmblDrPnONrEgdlNJKnO575IMIJUFsqHn0n6Wrm4thyJrSw PVyldTj8RGQydJxsmCT22IgPDMOoxDV0/yLguyTK9zJFHNyGIYYv2Hye8CHhKkbYhl3E9p5G5Guf a0w+yFWMYy12oyvyzLyZHS8UO/65TqyptCvAuUyXeFT46MCg/TD6pE0A4K8AAwDdfeDnDQplbmRz dHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTUxIDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDI1NzUvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL04g My9BbHRlcm5hdGUvRGV2aWNlUkdCPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJnJZ5VFN3Fsd/b8mekJWww2MNW4CwBpA1 bGGRHQRRCEkIARJCSNgFQUQFFEVEhKqVMtZtdEZPRZ0urmOtDtZ96tID9TDq6Di0FteOnRc4R51O Z6bT7x/v9zn3d+/v3d+9953zAKAnpaq11TALAI3WoM9KjMUWFRRipAkAAwogAhEAMnmtLi07IQfg ksZLsFrcCfyLnl4HkGm9IkzKwDDw/4kt1+kNAEAZOAcolLVynDtxrqo36Ez2GZx5pZUmhlET6/EE cbY0sWqeved85jnaxAqNVoGzKWedQqMw8WmcV9cZlTgjqTh31amV9ThfxdmlyqhR4/zcFKtRymoB QOkmu0EpL8fZD2e6PidLgvMCAMh01Ttc+g4blA0G06Uk1bpGvVpVbsDc5R6YKDRUjCUp66uUBoMw QyavlOkVmKRao5NpGwGYv/OcOKbaYniRg0WhwcFCfx/RO4X6r5u/UKbeztOTzLmeQfwLb20/51c9 CoB4Fq/N+re20i0AjK8EwPLmW5vL+wAw8b4dvvjOffimeSk3GHRhvr719fU+aqXcx1TQN/qfDr9A 77zPx3Tcm/JgccoymbHKgJnqJq+uqjbqsVqdTK7EhD8d4l8d+PN5eGcpy5R6pRaPyMOnTK1V4e3W KtQGdbUWU2v/UxN/ZdhPND/XuLhjrwGv2AewLvIA8rcLAOXSAFK0Dd+B3vQtlZIHMvA13+He/NzP Cfr3U+E+06NWrZqLk2TlYHKjvm5+z/RZAgKgAibgAStgD5yBOxACfxACwkE0iAfJIB3kgAKwFMhB OdAAPagHLaAddIEesB5sAsNgOxgDu8F+cBCMg4/BCfBHcB58Ca6BW2ASTIOHYAY8Ba8gCCJBDIgL WUEOkCvkBflDYigSiodSoSyoACqBVJAWMkIt0AqoB+qHhqEd0G7o99BR6AR0DroEfQVNQQ+g76CX MALTYR5sB7vBvrAYjoFT4Bx4CayCa+AmuBNeBw/Bo/A++DB8Aj4PX4Mn4YfwLAIQGsJHHBEhIkYk SDpSiJQheqQV6UYGkVFkP3IMOYtcQSaRR8gLlIhyUQwVouFoEpqLytEatBXtRYfRXehh9DR6BZ1C Z9DXBAbBluBFCCNICYsIKkI9oYswSNhJ+IhwhnCNME14SiQS+UQBMYSYRCwgVhCbib3ErcQDxOPE S8S7xFkSiWRF8iJFkNJJMpKB1EXaQtpH+ox0mTRNek6mkR3I/uQEciFZS+4gD5L3kD8lXybfI7+i sCiulDBKOkVBaaT0UcYoxygXKdOUV1Q2VUCNoOZQK6jt1CHqfuoZ6m3qExqN5kQLpWXS1LTltCHa 72if06ZoL+gcuiddQi+iG+nr6B/Sj9O/oj9hMBhujGhGIcPAWMfYzTjF+Jrx3Ixr5mMmNVOYtZmN mB02u2z2mElhujJjmEuZTcxB5iHmReYjFoXlxpKwZKxW1gjrKOsGa5bNZYvY6WwNu5e9h32OfZ9D 4rhx4jkKTifnA84pzl0uwnXmSrhy7gruGPcMd5pH5Al4Ul4Fr4f3W94Eb8acYx5onmfeYD5i/on5 JB/hu/Gl/Cp+H/8g/zr/pYWdRYyF0mKNxX6LyxbPLG0soy2Vlt2WByyvWb60wqzirSqtNliNW92x Rq09rTOt6623WZ+xfmTDswm3kdt02xy0uWkL23raZtk2235ge8F21s7eLtFOZ7fF7pTdI3u+fbR9 hf2A/af2Dxy4DpEOaocBh88c/oqZYzFYFTaEncZmHG0dkxyNjjscJxxfOQmccp06nA443XGmOoud y5wHnE86z7g4uKS5tLjsdbnpSnEVu5a7bnY96/rMTeCW77bKbdztvsBSIBU0CfYKbrsz3KPca9xH 3a96ED3EHpUeWz2+9IQ9gzzLPUc8L3rBXsFeaq+tXpe8Cd6h3lrvUe8bQrowRlgn3Cuc8uH7pPp0 +Iz7PPZ18S303eB71ve1X5Bfld+Y3y0RR5Qs6hAdE33n7+kv9x/xvxrACEgIaAs4EvBtoFegMnBb 4J+DuEFpQauCTgb9IzgkWB+8P/hBiEtISch7ITfEPHGGuFf8eSghNDa0LfTj0BdhwWGGsINhfw8X hleG7wm/v0CwQLlgbMHdCKcIWcSOiMlILLIk8v3IySjHKFnUaNQ30c7Riuid0fdiPGIqYvbFPI71 i9XHfhT7TBImWSY5HofEJcZ1x03Ec+Jz44fjv05wSlAl7E2YSQxKbE48nkRISknakHRDaieVS3dL Z5JDkpcln06hp2SnDKd8k+qZqk89lganJadtTLu90HWhduF4OkiXpm9Mv5MhyKjJ+EMmMTMjcyTz L1mirJass9nc7OLsPdlPc2Jz+nJu5brnGnNP5jHzivJ25z3Lj8vvz59c5Lto2aLzBdYF6oIjhaTC vMKdhbOL4xdvWjxdFFTUVXR9iWBJw5JzS62XVi39pJhZLCs+VEIoyS/ZU/KDLF02KpstlZa+Vzoj l8g3yx8qohUDigfKCGW/8l5ZRFl/2X1VhGqj6kF5VPlg+SO1RD2s/rYiqWJ7xbPK9MoPK3+syq86 oCFrSjRHtRxtpfZ0tX11Q/UlnZeuSzdZE1azqWZGn6LfWQvVLqk9YuDhP1MXjO7Glcapusi6kbrn 9Xn1hxrYDdqGC42ejWsa7zUlNP2mGW2WN59scWxpb5laFrNsRyvUWtp6ss25rbNtenni8l3t1PbK 9j91+HX0d3y/In/FsU67zuWdd1cmrtzbZdal77qxKnzV9tXoavXqiTUBa7ased2t6P6ix69nsOeH XnnvF2tFa4fW/riubN1EX3DftvXE9dr11zdEbdjVz+5v6r+7MW3j4QFsoHvg+03Fm84NBg5u30zd bNw8OZT6TwCkAVv+mLiZJJmQmfyaaJrVm0Kbr5wcnImc951kndKeQJ6unx2fi5/6oGmg2KFHobai JqKWowajdqPmpFakx6U4pammGqaLpv2nbqfgqFKoxKk3qamqHKqPqwKrdavprFys0K1ErbiuLa6h rxavi7AAsHWw6rFgsdayS7LCszizrrQltJy1E7WKtgG2ebbwt2i34LhZuNG5SrnCuju6tbsuu6e8 IbybvRW9j74KvoS+/796v/XAcMDswWfB48JfwtvDWMPUxFHEzsVLxcjGRsbDx0HHv8g9yLzJOsm5 yjjKt8s2y7bMNcy1zTXNtc42zrbPN8+40DnQutE80b7SP9LB00TTxtRJ1MvVTtXR1lXW2Ndc1+DY ZNjo2WzZ8dp22vvbgNwF3IrdEN2W3hzeot8p36/gNuC94UThzOJT4tvjY+Pr5HPk/OWE5g3mlucf 56noMui86Ubp0Opb6uXrcOv77IbtEe2c7ijutO9A78zwWPDl8XLx//KM8xnzp/Q09ML1UPXe9m32 +/eK+Bn4qPk4+cf6V/rn+3f8B/yY/Sn9uv5L/tz/bf//AgwA94Tz+woNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRv YmoNNTIgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNjE+PnN0cmVhbQ0KrKysAAAA9fX1+Pj4+fn5l5eXhoaGj4+P lZWVf39/eHh4e3t7eXl5goKCk5OTiYmJ8vLyzMzMr6+vV1rwCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag01 MyAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMDMvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJBMExCoYR AABQt/zrPwkZSChSFHIJg0lWlzGYlAHb917Oufe+9773vvcAAFprCKEQwlorpWSMYYxjjMYYhBDn nFLqnAshnHPmnLXW33+11tZahBDvvVIqpTTGKKV8AgwAW7E8uwoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoN NTQgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTIwL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiQTBQQ7E EAAAQL/cZF+imiKIFAeHthJ8oT37gXiER2ykIm47c9/38zy11jHGnBMAcJ5njNE5xxgLIVhrhRDb timlvPfruu77fhwHxvh931LK5/vLOffepZTXdWmtl2VBCBljOOcQQkIIpbS1llL6CzAAAhNDvQoN CmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNNTUgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTExL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29k ZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiQTBTQoFEQAAYLd89U5CE4mymBTyU7gCO4eYQ8zSAWyE3XxfKaW1NsY45wAA EEJKKe/9dV2MMQihlDLGeN835zyEYIwRQuy9e++11t9/vO+71qKUEkIwxjnnlJLW2jlnrZ1zPs/z CTAAfNc/0AoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNNTYgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTAzL0ZpbHRlci9G bGF0ZURlY29kZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiQTBuw2FERgAUFve5E7ikVBQiXgkomAFSgOYwQ7qr5Cg+8+p tY4x9t7vPYQQY4wQIoTAGCulUkqlFK0159w5F2O89wJA7/33h9baWstaSynNOYcQpJTGGO/9OWfO +QkwAHikOnUKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTU3IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDEyOC9GaWx0ZXIv RmxhdGVEZWNvZGU+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIkEwUEKhCAAAMB+ubAvUToomYIiqWh68At1ta69w2sPWFDJ bjuzbdt1Xa21932HYSi1TdOEMdZaO+eEEBDCeZ7HcVzXVUoJAKCUKqUYY6WU8zw/39++7/d9994R QpzzEIK19nmenPNxHLXWZVm89zFGQogxJqX0F2AA2EFM5AoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNNTgg MCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTQwL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiQTBSwqEIAAA UG85MCfRRA2T8BOEWEF1hSBoW3u30RHcB9HMkO7mvWmajuN4nielBAD4fH9t2w7DMI5j13V933vv X+9rnufzPAkhUkrnHOecUto0TV3XQgilFMY4xhhC2LYNQsgYK8tSa40QyrLMGJPneVEU930vy7Lv u7W2qqp1Xf8CDADxvlDjCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag01OSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxNDMv RmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJBMFLCoQgAABQbzkwJymljNQWEWX0WegVhMJl V/AArgW3ytCMVLt5TynlnLvv+3keAMD3l7qu45zP84wQyrKsqqphGMqyLIpiWRYppRBimiZCSJ7n dV1f12WMeb0/27aFEDDGlNJ1Xdu2tdZqrc/zHMex73sIoff+OI6UEmOsaZoY477vfwEGAI5aVQMK DQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTYwIDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDExNS9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNv ZGU+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIkEwVEKBBEAAFC33NqTkFBMQhpNmIm5wnz5klNtdiV/+97zPK21OedaCwDw /Q3GGEJIa40xjjFe1yWldM5BCDnn3vveeynl9f7s+26M2bbtPM/7voUQx3FYa0MIY4ycc0qp1kop JYQopf4CDAAP10D2Cg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag02MSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMjcvRmls dGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJBMExCsMgAABAf1noS0xEEwyIqKCSKGi+oOCYOZBX tH2Am1A7ZOtdSuk4jt77fd8AAEIIhJBzPk0TYyyE4JxDCAkhhmEYx5FSKqX89t88z8uyvN6fx7OV Ulpr3ntrrdZaKXWeV8651mqM2bYNY7zve4xxXde/AAMASmBFHAoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoN NjIgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTM4L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiQB7AIT/ rKys3t7e+Pj4+fn5AAAAm5ublJSUioqKf39/eXl5eHh4fn5+j4+Pe3t7hISElpaW8/T1V1rwycnJ 9/f3jIyMkJCQkZGRg4ODjo6Oenp6mpqat7e39fX1BAgLhoaGhYWFgoKCgICAlZWVra2t6OjoCQwQ k5OTiYmJl5eXAgwABMdIBAoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNNjMgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTAy L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiQTBOw7AEAAAUHPXpmdr0qsIAwZEiPgkuILR JRzCHZoYxOa9WisAoPe+1tp7X/djrVVKaa2996WUGKMxRkoZQmCMOecope/3t9bmnCmlnPMYgxCC EBJCcM4xxhDCI8AATjU0awoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNNjQgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNjc+ PnN0cmVhbQ0KrKysAAAAlZWVe3t7ioqKeXl5enp6goKCeHh4iIiIfn5+f39/hoaGmZmZi4uLgICA g4ODV1rwj4+PjIyMlpaWkZGRCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag02NSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCA3 MD4+c3RyZWFtDQqsrKwAAACAgICPj497e3t+fn59fX2VlZWQkJCUlJR4eHibm5uampqTk5ODg4N5 eXmCgoKMjIxXWvCEhIR/f3+WlpaKiooKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTY2IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVu Z3RoIDc5Pj5zdHJlYW0NCqysrAAAAHh4eH9/f3p6epaWlpGRkYODg4SEhHt7e46Ojn5+fpSUlJub m5qamoyMjJCQkFda8Hl5eYKCgoqKioCAgJWVlYWFhY+Pj4aGhgoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoN NjcgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNTU+PnN0cmVhbQ0KrKysAAAAjo6OioqKj4+PlZWVhISEg4ODm5ub kZGRlpaWk5OTjIyMlJSUV1rwmpqamZmZ9/f3Cg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag02OCAwIG9iajw8 L0xlbmd0aCA3Mz4+c3RyZWFtDQoAAACTk5ODg4N4eHh5eXmCgoKMjIyQkJCUlJR7e3uAgICPj49+ fn59fX2VlZWbm5uampr39/esrKxXWvCKiop/f3+EhISWlpYKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTY5 IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDg5L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiQTByw0AERAA UF1uspUMEiN+BxFGggMtKG5vc933hBClFCJaa/XevfcAEELQWtdajTGIqJQaY5xz9t7MfO993i+l FGN0zllrc85Syjlna+0XYAChlytICg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag03MCAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0 aCAxMDUvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJBMFNCgURAABgl5jeYg42NSchC4UU ieRv4QqcwnnU2wi7+T4AAEKIUuq9F0JACAkhUkqMcYwx52ytXWvtveecz/s3xmitQwillJSSUopz zhhzzp1zxhi999ZarfX63Z8AAwCF7Tb8Cg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag03MSAwIG9iajw8L0xl bmd0aCAxMzIvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJAHUAiv8AAACVlZWampqbm5uZ mZmWlpb39/f5+fn4+PjZ2dmxsbGsrKxXWvCEhIR9fX2JiYmPj4+CgoJ7e3uIiIiTk5N+fn6UlJTn 5+e8vLx6enp5eXmLi4t/f394eHiAgICDg4OGhoaKioqRk5Tt7e3Jycmvr68OEBECDABYNkVHCg0K ZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag03MiAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxNzEvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2Rl Pj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJBMHLCkVAAABQf6nul3iEyatIzDSD8AtTWNmwmbKajayUraUyhbC750iSFEVR URRhGKqq6jiOrutZliGEbNv2fT9JkjRNFUV5nuf7PoRJ0zSUUvknDMOoqqosSwghxpgQAgAwTdOy LNd1NU2L49jzvPu+hRDruo7jGARBnueMsWVZjuN43/e6rn3f53kehqFt277vp2natu08T85513V1 Xf8FGADAPGyECg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag03MyAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCA1Mj4+c3RyZWFt DQoAAACVlZWampqbm5uZmZmWlpZXWvD39/esrKy0tLS+vr7T09Pm5ubw8PD19fX4+Pj5+fkKDQpl bmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTc0IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDU4Pj5zdHJlYW0NClda8AAAAPf396ys rJubm5SUlIqKin9/f3l5eXh4eH5+fnt7e4yMjJCQkJaWlpGRkYODg4SEhI6OjgoNCmVuZHN0cmVh bQ1lbmRvYmoNNzUgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMjY2L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZT4+c3RyZWFt DQpIiezPMYuCYACH8X9gIRwE0WkEDReEiCG8yzUERiRBEjRoUFNLgS5RYOvbVNCYu6tOLS4tjkHj 4Ri0usrN7+R1n+Pu9wmeB0Ce5/M5u16Zrn8REhjGU5LOHGcAn40G7ffvnU4kCALw1myeDgdmmhmg KoriOE4cx4yxJEkopb1fN8uyut1YkjxAqFYdQkKgx/MWoAD1NE3DMGy3fc/zLOu7UrFl2R4Mztvt czaLdN3e76PplE4mKfBeq7mj0QPglstbqVQ/HuNyedFqLXa7ANCAD1FUed68XLL12gfk1epOiLvZ PDiOAUGh8OqMgNeIL4rGeOxTmmnaqVhUAXc4TPDvz/sRYABSqVX6Cg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9i ag03NiAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMD4+c3RyZWFtDQpXWvCsrKwAAAAKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5k b2JqDTc3IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDQxL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiVTF IQIAMAzCQHT//8dKZCRlchcRSUkA2/v0GPptWL85AQYAepccNQ0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag03 OCAwIG9iajw8L1R5cGUvRm9udERlc2NyaXB0b3IvRm9udEJCb3hbLTU2OCAtMzA3IDIwMDAgMTAw N10vRm9udE5hbWUvVGltZXNOZXdSb21hblBTTVQvRmxhZ3MgMzQvU3RlbVYgODIvQ2FwSGVpZ2h0 IDY1Ni9YSGVpZ2h0IDAvQXNjZW50IDg5MS9EZXNjZW50IC0yMTYvSXRhbGljQW5nbGUgMC9Gb250 RmFtaWx5KFRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbikvRm9udFN0cmV0Y2gvTm9ybWFsL0ZvbnRXZWlnaHQgNDAw Pj4NZW5kb2JqDTc5IDAgb2JqPDwvVHlwZS9Gb250RGVzY3JpcHRvci9Gb250QkJveFstNTE3IC0z MjUgMTA4MiA5OThdL0ZvbnROYW1lL0FyaWFsLUl0YWxpY01UL0ZsYWdzIDk2L1N0ZW1WIDg1Ljg2 MzAwNy9DYXBIZWlnaHQgNzE4L1hIZWlnaHQgNTE1L0FzY2VudCA5MDUvRGVzY2VudCAtMjExL0l0 YWxpY0FuZ2xlIC0xNS9Gb250RmFtaWx5KEFyaWFsKS9Gb250U3RyZXRjaC9Ob3JtYWwvRm9udFdl aWdodCA0MDA+Pg1lbmRvYmoNODAgMCBvYmo8PC9UeXBlL0ZvbnREZXNjcmlwdG9yL0ZvbnRCQm94 Wy0yMSAtNjgwIDYzOCAxMDIxXS9Gb250TmFtZS9Db3VyaWVyTmV3UFNNVC9GbGFncyAzNC9TdGVt ViA0Mi9DYXBIZWlnaHQgNTc4L1hIZWlnaHQgNDIxL0FzY2VudCA4MzIvRGVzY2VudCAtMzAwL0l0 YWxpY0FuZ2xlIDAvRm9udEZhbWlseShDb3VyaWVyIE5ldykvRm9udFN0cmV0Y2gvTm9ybWFsL0Zv bnRXZWlnaHQgNDAwPj4NZW5kb2JqDTgxIDAgb2JqPDwvVHlwZS9Gb250RGVzY3JpcHRvci9Gb250 QkJveFstNTU4IC0zMDcgMjAwMCAxMDI2XS9Gb250TmFtZS9UaW1lc05ld1JvbWFuUFMtQm9sZE1U L0ZsYWdzIDM0L1N0ZW1WIDEzNi9DYXBIZWlnaHQgNjU2L1hIZWlnaHQgMC9Bc2NlbnQgODkxL0Rl c2NlbnQgLTIxNi9JdGFsaWNBbmdsZSAwL0ZvbnRGYW1pbHkoVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuKS9Gb250 U3RyZXRjaC9Ob3JtYWwvRm9udFdlaWdodCA3MDA+Pg1lbmRvYmoNODIgMCBvYmo8PC9UeXBlL0Zv bnREZXNjcmlwdG9yL0ZvbnRCQm94Wy00OTggLTMwNyAxMTIwIDEwMjNdL0ZvbnROYW1lL1RpbWVz TmV3Um9tYW5QUy1JdGFsaWNNVC9GbGFncyA5OC9TdGVtViA3MS43NDIwMDQvQ2FwSGVpZ2h0IDY1 Ni9YSGVpZ2h0IDAvQXNjZW50IDg5MS9EZXNjZW50IC0yMTYvSXRhbGljQW5nbGUgLTE1L0ZvbnRG YW1pbHkoVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuKS9Gb250U3RyZXRjaC9Ob3JtYWwvRm9udFdlaWdodCA0MDA+ Pg1lbmRvYmoNODMgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMjQvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDk4 L0hlaWdodCAxL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDM5IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmpl Y3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiVqzhsqAgWgQHvVhqCCAAAMAFB6TRgoNCmVuZHN0 cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNODQgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNDQvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRo IDEwNS9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9Y T2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas4a2gAEbmDVrVn9/f0tLSy0YdHZ2zpw5 EyIVHvVhqCCAAAMA06CotQoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNODUgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNTMv RmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDExMi9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgv Q29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIla s4augAEJtLW1zZw5c+rUqdVg0NXVVVlZWVVV1dTUBCSBbIiy8KgPQwgBBBgACSy54woNCmVuZHN0 cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNODYgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNjIvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRo IDExNi9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9Y T2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas2YAAAMMtLW1VVdXV4JBf3//1KlTq8Gg qampoqKip6dn5syZXV1dQFmgYjRDwqM+DHIEEGAAmkjGNAoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNODcg MCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNjgvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDEyMC9IZWlnaHQgMS9C aXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUv SW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas2YgAQMY9PT0TJgwYcqUKdXV1RVg0NDQ0N/fXw0GdXV1tbW1U6dO nT179qxZsyBa8JgZHvVhECKAAAMA+cfP7goNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNODggMCBvYmo8PC9M ZW5ndGggNjUvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDEyMy9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29t cG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0 cmVhbQ0KSIlas2aAAQMMVFZWVlRU1NXV9ff3V1dXA7n19fVAkZaWlkowAAoCRaZNmzYbDIBaiLQi POrD4EEAAQYAowTV3woNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNODkgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNzUvRmls dGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDEyOC9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29s b3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas4Ye YAMMbNu2bRduwAAG08Bg4sSJzc3NFRUVLS0t1WDQ19dXV1dXAQP19fVVVVVTpkyZPXs2RCOprgqP +jDgCCDAACHF4s8KDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTkwIDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDExNC9GaWx0 ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTMwL0hlaWdodCAxL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xv clNwYWNlIDM5IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiVqzhppg w4YNW7Zs2b1794EDB86cOXPlypWHYPDs2bOXL19++vTpCxh8BYPPGAAoxQAGTU1NDQ0NEyZMmDJl SldXV2VlZUtLSzUYTJ06taenByjSBAZA2YqKitbWVohGShwfHvVhoBBAgAEAz770SAoNCmVuZHN0 cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNOTEgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTEwL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0 aCAxMzMvSGVpZ2h0IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzkgMCBSL1R5cGUv WE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJWrOGCmDt2rWbNm3avXv3sWPHrl+//uzZ s/fv33/+/Pn79+8/fvyAkBDwkzjAAAaTJ09ua2urqKiorKysr6+vBIPOzs5qMJg6der06dOBCvrB AMgFqgEqBmqkhp9AIDzqA50RQIABAFbKA4oKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTkyIDAgb2JqPDwv TGVuZ3RoIDExMS9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTM1L0hlaWdodCAxL0JpdHNQZXJD b21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDM5IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+ c3RyZWFtDQpIiVqzhlKwadOmgwcPXrly5cWLF58/f/4OBj/A4CcFgAEMpkyZMnv27GnTpvX393d1 dfX19QFJIHvq1KktYACUAiqYPHlyMxgA2RMnToToffz48YULF/bs2bNhwwaKfQkC4VEf6IMAAgwA JCkNyAoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNOTMgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTEyL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0 ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxMzcvSGVpZ2h0IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2Ug MzkgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJtM8xCsAgDAXQ3rLQ eyWgXkFxc/AETl7Bxd0iSHWrNQhd29JHhhAI+ZHyPa21tdZ7H2PMOR9DrbVNy017jhYBgHMuBsYY TDRExN6LCQfq6WjP01OVUlJKIQTnnDFGKfXh78u67X/XKcAA1KQRHAoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRv YmoNOTQgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTMyL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxMzkvSGVp Z2h0IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzkgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9T dWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJWrOGTLBx48aDBw9eu3bt7du3nz9//v79+48fP35iAAYM gKkGD4BoqQWDzs7OmTNn9vf3NzU1VYMBULCjo2Py5MlAkbq6uilTpsyePXvatGlNYDBr1iygYkwb ge78+vUr0M0vXry4ePHinj171q9fT24wgEB41AfaIYAAAwA7CRFhCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9i ag05NSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMjEvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE0MS9IZWln aHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1 YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas4YcsGXLlqNHj967d+/Dhw/fweAnbsCAA+DRgqm9qqqq qakJSFZWVnZ3d9fX11dUVDQ0NDQ3N9fV1QHZHR0dQAZQvK2tbebMmVOnTq0Gg66uLoJ2Qbzw9u3b GzduHDhwYMOGDWSFCgiER32gBQIIMAAsOxSyCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag05NiAwIG9iajw8 L0xlbmd0aCAxMjAvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE0My9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVy Q29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+ PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas4YcsHXr1gsXLrx///7r16/fv3//SQRgwA2I1FtRUdHT0zNz5syurq7Kysrm 5ubq6mogA8idNm3axIkTm5qa2traIIJA0N/fP3Xq1GowAEoRYxEEAH0E9NfLly+PHz++ceNGskII BMKjPlAXAQQYAF0AGj0KDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTk3IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDEzMi9G aWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTQ0L0hlaWdodCAxL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9D b2xvclNwYWNlIDM5IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiVqz Bh0wIAEMyTW7wOD27dufPn36+vXr9+/ffxINGPACghrr6upqa2unTp06e/bsWbNmTZgwYfLkyc3N zRUVFZWVlU1NTT09PUDBKVOmVFdXV4BBQ0NDf39/NRgAteO3BRMAfQf047t37y5evLh161bM0CAG hEd9oCICCDAA5LUU3woNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNOTggMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTE3L0Zp bHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNDYvSGVpZ2h0IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0Nv bG9yU3BhY2UgMzkgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJWrMG C2DAAHCpXbt23b179zMYfP369SfpANNwZIBfV2VlZXV1dX19/bRp02YjgSlTpnR1dQHFgQoqKirq 6ur6+/uBKoFcoCBQpKWlpRIM8FiBH/z48QPo3w8fPty8eRMYCNiCjTAIj/pAFQQQYADT3xoKCg0K ZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag05OSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMTUvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2Rl L1dpZHRoIDE0OC9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIv VHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlaswY7YMABdu/eff/+/S9fvnz/ /v0nxQCXLRCAVXEFGNTX11dVVU2ZMmX27NmzZs3q6emZMGHCNBiYOHFic3MzUFlLS0s1GPT19dXV 1VXAAKbhpAKg94GBcPfu3V27duEIQgIgPOoDhQggwADdLx2RCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0x MDAgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTE0L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNDkvSGVpZ2h0 IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzkgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0 eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJWrMGO2DAAe7fv//169cfP378pDbAah2mmp6ensrKyqampq6u roqKitbW1v7+/ra2NggbKN7Q0DBhwoQpU6YAFQBVtrS0VIPB1KlT4XqBANNw8gAwKIABcvfu3e3b t+MIS3wgPOoDJQggwAB/oS0wCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMDEgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGgg NjYvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE1MC9IZWlnaHQgMi9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50 IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzNiAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0K SIliYIAARihgYmbBD8CqIAxWNnYOTi5uHl4+Ni4eTh4efm5uDlY2qDRWwCwgKCjEgAqEsQCGQekq gAADAJJjBz0KDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTEwMiAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMTAvRmlsdGVy L0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE1Mi9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JT cGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlaswYfYEAF Bw8efP/+/Y8fP37SBSBbjSY4bdq02bNnT548ubm5GciYOHFiT09PX18fkJwyZQpQBKigv7+/q6sL KAgkgeypU6e2gAFcL5rJVAQ/wODly5d79uzBG8DoIDzqA3kIIMAARwFIxgoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1l bmRvYmoNMTAzIDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDg3L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNTMv SGVpZ2h0IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzkgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVj dC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJWrMGH2BABdevX//+/ftP+gK47cgiU6dOnQ0D06ZN gzBmzpw5FQxmzZqFJgIXBCpG1otmMtXBjx8/vn79evny5Q0bNuANaXQQHvWBVAQQYADTWFULCg0K ZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMDQgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTA3L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29k ZS9XaWR0aCAxNTQvSGVpZ2h0IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzkgMCBS L1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJWrOGAGBAAi9evPj+/ftPugNk N8C5dXV1U6ZMmT179rRp05qammbNmtXf39/S0lILBp2dnTNnzgSKAKWqwQAo2NHRMXnyZKAIsl64 sTQFwHB78uTJtm3bCIU3CgiP+kASAggwAMNRUdsKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTEwNSAwIG9i ajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMTIvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE1NS9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRz UGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1h Z2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas4YwYICBT58+/fjx4+dAAAYMUFdXV19f39bWNnPmzKlTp1ZXV3d1dVVW VlZVVTU1NQFJILu7uxuopqKioqGhobm5GagFyO7o6EDTCzGQDr74/v37u3fvDhw4QESoI0B41Afi EUCAAQB/0VUmCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMDYgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTAxL0ZpbHRl ci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNTYvSGVpZ2h0IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9y U3BhY2UgMzkgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJWrOGMGBA Aj8HDjCggra2turq6kow6O/vnzp1KpDb1NRUUVHR09Mzc+bMrq4uoFRzczNEGZA7bdq0iRMnAtVg 6qWn7378+PH58+cTJ06sXbuWiOCHgvCoD0QigAADAGsEWJ4KDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTEw NyAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMDcvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE1Ny9IZWlnaHQg MS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5 cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas4YowAADP2kAGFAB8SqnTJlSXV1dAQYNDQ39/f1Abl1dXW1t 7dSpU2fPnj1r1qwJEyZMnjy5ubkZqKaysrKpqamnpwcoiKmXdh7EBb58+XL58uX169cTFwkgEB71 gRgEEGAAym9QwQoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTA4IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDEwNi9GaWx0 ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTU5L0hlaWdodCAxL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xv clNwYWNlIDM5IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiVqzhliw fft2Bhj4SRxgwAHwqKyoqGhpaSFoEVxBXV1df39/dXV1ZWVlfX09RDuQDRQBcqdNmzYbCUyZMqWr qwsoDlQAVIlVL0kepBb4/v37/fv3N2zYQHRsrAmP+kAQAQQYAFcpPWgKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5k b2JqDTEwOSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMTkvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE2MC9I ZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0 L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas4ZYsHfv3rdv3zKAwU8iAAMSmDJlyuzZs2fNmtXT 0wMXxFRcXV3d19dXV1dXAQb19fVYFSNraW5uBqpsaWmpBgM07VVVVchWT5gwYRoMTJw4EZde4v1I XfD9+/fHjx9v27aN6DhZEx71AT8CCDAAivhB3woNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTEwIDAgb2Jq PDwvTGVuZ3RoIDEyMC9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTYxL0hlaWdodCAyL0JpdHNQ ZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDM1IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFn ZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiYyO2xKDIAxEtbJGARu13kq9/P9fiqMoPNRxn8KZDTlR5Cd+JQLiCpASZbmk TAH2Ba2LN6uU7OgKXDq4F6v64xj8v+7StF3g0V8J+PBNgj0gL4whzeonNyce7d1JWngYwhj24F7k kz0WFM28/DFcBRgAqZAKKwoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTExIDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDEy NC9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTYyL0hlaWdodCAxL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQg OC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDM5IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpI iVqzhiiwffv2t2/f/vjx4ydxgAEMJk+e3NzcPHv27Ilg0NPT09fXBySnTJkCFJw2bVp/fz9EZVdX F5A9derUFjAASgEVIGuH6GWAAWRbcAFM7WhWAy0FCuKyGtmiAQHfv39/+PDhhg0biIuiNeFRH3Ah gAADAOM/Q48KDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTExMiAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMDAvRmlsdGVy L0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE2My9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JT cGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlas4YosGHD hufPn//48eMncYABDGaDwbRp02bDwMyZM6eCwaxZs+AiEMVwQaB6IBuuBa4drpeBMoBs9VQYwGo1 RD2RXqYR+P79+/Xr19euXUtcRK0Jj/qAFQEEGADGuzqACg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMTMg MCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTE3L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjQvSGVpZ2h0IDIv Qml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzQgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBl L0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJlM7REoIgEIVhTE66IgFSaolZ6vs/YzkyIzhe1H/5zc7sYSwoOaU8 Cucsp0KIUsqLEoCWpiK74mIAaR0ilgRtBvDfu97CNaz2Rdi0u4m4q4funOupd8/v98G+jH2v6G0c 9ojw8K+NfJqPRn4EGAD0AQwtCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMTQgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGgg MTE4L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjUvSGVpZ2h0IDIvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVu dCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzMgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0N CkiJlM7BFoIgEIVhkhkYQM2KSi3U3v8lHYrTUWmR/wq+M4srxKJDIdcBotJkrHVlhTVAdWzMiRJ+ LUNC4D7GD/l/54sXq66xJfjbfbMRrG0VdX2vH8/APzQuDJQw2sgrTY58GGe+jfaMlNPrx8hZgAEA iIMJYgoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTE1IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDExNy9GaWx0ZXIvRmxh dGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTY2L0hlaWdodCAyL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNl IDMyIDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiZSOyxKCQAwEV3Y2 CYm8VUSF//9MFoUqEC70bbrm0M6tuCR+CwKxpBSY1cyAK5Nk+SInZwVAe/k9IhIdwZ+grGq3oYms 9+1e/kUC4ZGJcNsW9gRUtXtJGmYZ3fujiu5A/o5TpsipSt8P+8pRgAEAFgcIfwoNCmVuZHN0cmVh bQ1lbmRvYmoNMTE2IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDE0OC9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGgg MTY3L0hlaWdodCAzL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDMxIDAgUi9UeXBlL1hP YmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiZSQ2Q7CIBBF0VK0DFuhbmhdWqr//4cSEnXA J87bnNyEEwhBrNZNDm1pBttsOw5CSqWBcdNbl3RXSNP/hmnQVDHscBTZR/B9OJ6KStpGUKYz4AHO 8fWLs+qrPZLeSGAjHlZ3Xm+k7MTn/fH3mXllhE/cKiFmWugkw7iEp550F2b7GUa3hMrO4VVmvgUY AODUDlIKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTExNyAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxNzgvRmlsdGVyL0Zs YXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE2OC9IZWlnaHQgNS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFj ZSAzMCAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSInckssSgiAUQEkF L2RpmEWFimbP///ASB1EbJHTrrNguGdYnLkDQhYLzx8TYE0wYN/HkBAoAQAKwIge3qdxWuon/vd4 SzsLRVFkj6u1m9l2DnG4H/G0N042PN0C5WG2i+M9y7gQxrVyTujhiJxQezp9XOek09lxRyqTNC8Y EaWqeKXqXJ4b4zo5J/Ry/YPO2w+dd14IpTIiuHywUjVCldS4Xs74o97T6XwJMABbkhbFCg0KZW5k c3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMTggMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTc3L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9X aWR0aCAxNjkvSGVpZ2h0IDQvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMjkgMCBSL1R5 cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJnJDbDoIwEAURtrRdQECKoqWgeEP9 //+TmNgLido4b2eyD5MNAotFGLkAeQFviAbmxJRxxCTl2TIvSrqqUNTaaQkQ+bHe2GFB09hru5uf g5tFvoRilnIhsRVcqmKCdVJoZyR4poa9Ewpgr/3h79BhqLDl/JghyhMrypgqpYyzpV9peHYywfno 5foplPwKZawTU1Qei7rDMb3hWCfUOEf6ld4fpnL6Z/MUYABZUhK3Cg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9i ag0xMTkgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTg5L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNzAvSGVp Z2h0IDQvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMjggMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9T dWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJjJDbDoMgEAWxgggVwVZlW+ul9v//sSCpIqbB80CykxN2 sgh5SS5pEEx+wTaE7OctWUZpzhi/FoJnJaNSFSXd2B6afrjomOq2OLnvEbqjiCneSZG/qnXdCN62 GtQDnl3dvUCLZmMhPKHaJ6unEY2apksRADSEsp4mwdxkAM2XJox2sO/KDjCu2k/Wk4MTPXFTrOTb 3EIOQrTznHuy3qExY2z+rE1bHIX02BFGVSu323ka068AAwDN1BXkCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9i ag0xMjAgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTcyL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjkvSGVp Z2h0IDMvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMjcgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9T dWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJfI/hEoIgEAYtP0kFTkqyTCvTev9XDAcRdMr7xezszS1R 5Ge3jxcDIGGHJM1yLiRRoQo6pszQkx24J0qtAxNWLD0zsFhBIN6a6TZwtm1V0BldritX1jeVCaKG C8VYm0vSgmTtU6dgw0LTLFpxZgbO2w5ulrrbuEc/Qh/P5ZcYqbZ7CcbKRiR9z4d399EWLlpHMTQ5 vGjZCIc1xN/U+TbgOquvAAMA+oEUdQoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTIxIDAgb2JqPDwvTGVu Z3RoIDIyMi9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTY4L0hlaWdodCA0L0JpdHNQZXJDb21w b25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDI2IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3Ry ZWFtDQpIiXSR2w6CMBBEUYfSrtSKincB8fr/X+g2paWgzhM5mdmehCTpM5nOfIBUZFLRPNdK0kJp KU3KCRBYdoFlcdPwOEW8tnCwdkUAs+8gvA14s6KINJPVuu9uSmPMdkcLrfdzInk4iPQ4gN4UYBY3 Ba/5sWht4Wjt2Lcpk1AMmiPP07nrXlBR3VxLkSk+2m5UkxHV+Qg6UdiIuFkDxKwU8MzC8bpjGKoC fRH/PG93132QVs2zIsX/88VH31XeSvkDsil8+ia/3VggA7Pwx0nHEFTtR1SMNYuPAAMAUn0dCQoN CmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTIyIDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDE3Ny9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNv ZGUvV2lkdGggMTY3L0hlaWdodCAzL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDI1IDAg Ui9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiXTQiw7CIAwF0F033SyviW4O lf//TQvYBSM2gSUnLbvQdVLoDv0wDDiexmk8k9JmMto6p2i+0KmJANhQSnBkhIKZII0JG9Mf0wZS dSOwJ/Pe7yG5rjdOCaLF2jXv/FGWiBS1cQHWvMOmtSMfkkga1Z/pYk20VcoqZrnNvQe2VbsQHvln 4TlvL74cW0G9xVihCwBb7iwvmzBNaiBCGuXIn+lsTYzfKf1bgAEA4QoViAoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1l bmRvYmoNMTIzIDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDEyMi9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTY2 L0hlaWdodCAyL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDI0IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmpl Y3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiWzPWQ6AIAwEUMZSQXEBl/tf1VYQjaF/fZlJWmN0 8ExHlnvXl80PY5hmNUVegl/j+OIdFMtJIKNsSwBibedkq63WRMDUSTLmeyVvHTm/z8/NbiLOJmg5 EtvjfFFNSrYk9UdB2SIBR22XZKst1sTfkekSYAAUbwhgCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMjQg MCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTIzL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjUvSGVpZ2h0IDIv Qml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMjMgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBl L0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJbI7REoMgDAS5GlGjEkux//+phUCq7bBvbO6Yc66AymOg0U8w5oWY 1flp3eY9sBzPS6oD5GgSqO0cvLct2WsH7knAfYkFe+gqfgml0zbyOJAkdelcM8s7icpypebySmlJ lYBKwNpCf+36ZXM9id+JMX4EGADUawp7Cg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMjUgMCBvYmo8PC9M ZW5ndGggMTI5L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjQvSGVpZ2h0IDMvQml0c1BlckNv bXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMjIgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5z dHJlYW0NCkiJ1M6LCoAwCAXQXWu9a7X1/P8fTZcjon4gQZCDVzSGC1pEWX5N1hYlVXXdtGJ51w9u tIqyyK3Gk24Ckha8jST+SOvJZG8ETKrpKvOTH/mkj5/5MFMcwjJ2s+fs6sRo2w/aEgKCgBqQNsHp iLgtcPyR1pNqH/h6cToFGABIKxASCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMjYgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5n dGggMTIwL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjMvSGVpZ2h0IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBv bmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzkgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJl YW0NCkiJWrMGBBjAoBIGOjs7GVBBf3//1KlT6+vr0cTb2toqKiqAWoBScL3VYABUP336dKACuF4g ACoGSgGVNTU1TZ48GZd2iOFo2oEiWPXCHYPVdogUVqvhUnhcDredSJdj9ThWveRph7h5DW4QHvUB KwIIMACSTdteCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMjcgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTE2L0ZpbHRl ci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjIvSGVpZ2h0IDIvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9y U3BhY2UgMjEgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJbM7hDoAg CATgTqMus6z3f9kArdWMP4yPY2NAiHGUCVozF2tIYwxmU+KqtuSQNzbUtWNGNZ1bEvgE67UlO3ys Rwx37XcBIlKY/DPSGnlUE5JqNpaGwAnHA3CDdU/q4SvYrhN/8LEOge7B/RJgACfGCOcKDQplbmRz dHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTEyOCAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMjkvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dp ZHRoIDE2My9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlw ZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIliYACBajCoBYOOjo7Jkyc3NTXV1dWB JRmmTZsG5M6aNau/v58BCcycORMoApSCa0fWO2XKlNmzZyPrBYKWlhaILZ2dnZjaIcZ+BwNMqyF6 gYKc3HzIeiEqcdkOlELWjstqXC5Hs51U7Xj0kqEd6Jc1OEB41Af8CCDAAOtF7mEKDQplbmRzdHJl YW0NZW5kb2JqDTEyOSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMjEvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRo IDE2NC9IZWlnaHQgMS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9Y T2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIliYACBioqKhoaG5ubmOjAAcjs6OoCM+vr6 tra2mTNnTp06tbq6uqurq7KykgEGgOzu7m6gGmTt+PUCQVVVVVNTE5DEqh1o7HckAOQia4frZcAG sNoOkULTTpLLMW0nw+NY9ZKhHeiXNdhAeNQHggggwAAcvulHCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0x MzAgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTE2L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjUvSGVpZ2h0 IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzkgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0 eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJYmAAgerq6srKyq6urmnTpk0Eg6ampra2Nog4EPT390+dOhXI BYpXVFT09PTMnDkTqB4o1dzcjKYdv1782oGO+Y4KgCJ4rGaAgWlggGk7A8yDxLgcbhqay6nicax6 ydAOdN4abCA86gNBBBBgAEHz928KDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTEzMSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0 aCAxMTgvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE2Ni9IZWlnaHQgMi9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9u ZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAyMCAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVh bQ0KSIl0ztESgjAMRNGrqUAsGhGr//+nFkgpM9V9PLPJLJzOEi5d1w8qco063u726DestiPTGjKy F7cmUK8pifrnpVuDPNfMx2A2vFIQGaOGJO+g6WPmWK2gj5zICKW4NPOgwzX49TL090u3BmlHzl8B BgDA+A3CCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMzIgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTE5L0ZpbHRlci9G bGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjcvSGVpZ2h0IDIvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3Bh Y2UgMTkgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJdI7bEkAwEEND WXXXuhT//6G2tEqHPO2cJDsBklQIkeU5FVKWFVHdtF3vYGAOYnCChWCdwcxe+Gmz8/nSsxgCSin9 Fkaa5iVtjVk5uiXrbGjaPQzsgvfKATiDCHq02Xy02ft86dhiyy+IeKTWhwADAMxWDkAKDQplbmRz dHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTEzMyAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAxMjcvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dp ZHRoIDE2OC9IZWlnaHQgMi9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAxOCAwIFIvVHlw ZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIlsjkkWgyAQRKtFCYgaFFETh/sfM5Cn DIm16MV/XQNABSsr4kT0EELWpZK8EgEG5iGcmktIH3nuRu5WuI08E4G2cyfpBp6/gu4HMyqrrVVy mkbDZrP0AUbmoB8Zh34brkedu5G7Z9xG+sSXU/tet30/ELv/d34EGABBeg6CCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFt DWVuZG9iag0xMzQgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTgxL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAx NjkvSGVpZ2h0IDMvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMTcgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9i amVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJbI/rFoIgEIQHUbEsEoxS0+71/o/YSiAH9fuz 7Jyd3QFgLOE8ZWysGeOcZ7Z1YtA4gJxwxT5G1txA5Kap1ZWkC1Hk+WZbjtCUvw3sZmAv5SGtlNZS 1kdlTjxTSRXESZvyTUnpiBA2Kw3qyA1EbhpZrHTfFMW5aUoHbfK3l0Fb1XaXfrjejBlq099Tph9d EL0WclLAf2ODCngiN2K3xgpPAq/3pwwA/ja+s6A/AQYAYlQTIgoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoN MTM1IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDQwNC9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTcwL0hlaWdo dCA3L0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDE2IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3Vi dHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiXyT6VaDMBSEJyaEJQRblFIEpHXfd33/RzMbkNCj9wdwhjtz P5IAkCPKIs5onCRpxhkTOU/lLFoNKObCsSqlmLt60o1wNbrhu3PO4ZqtdaXKXddlUJhmAydB4TSv NvU2kiwlpG64lGeCt56oNY2wJFUDp8G6UXfCr8mtE3l7gOpIywXpDLRARRdXqhraMSlbwVkne8Y9 sRUG00f1ZtrBulF38oDGum2iigxQ/yDVQJhmL0jPm2pD6jiOkyiSPedDK2XnidIx/kcK1Zhod7hw SKZEHem9LKAZsSB1RBhnh4sKuROZ3KVndUMpU7k5YSmdxHnfvQOAYomq3I1xBx+hlnVMNJEOtdhf XF4BeqdXwILToI5AASo6yVm6zSRTG8iuVe5NJnIrOkyMpCPz7d39vngIkFjXGTcWqHCJNlIl7B+f nl9ep0OJA06DOgIFpCADaapY0IFSkfd9XG2jKiGD9xfBkZaOuSzXb+8fn8VMCwyDdYeo6oVNNJFE HYCv75/ysMK/XB8AAyT8Rf0VYAAHKT2lCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMzYgMCBvYmo8PC9M ZW5ndGggODYvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE2OS9IZWlnaHQgMi9CaXRzUGVyQ29t cG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAxNSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0 cmVhbQ0KSInUjkkSwCAIBAdH1Oz+/7UBycFUXpC+QE3RACCSyCziVYWkEkYBahAN0Fo0bbCs236c tV7dcCFs9BeW+0YdFxLxyDPli1lZYn7KfvLoLcAA+MgHsQoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTM3 IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDE3MS9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTY4L0hlaWdodCAx L0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDM5IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlw ZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiZyRPwrDIBTGvWWhVylmEAczZUgIqFfo4OQBPIAn8AJuQgi1W42P PqSmHfrjmz7eP75HyAGldBxHKeU0TYyxW4VWhBDzPBdzGAbScbmmVmA+OnofnPubtqD1TzHGWGud c977EEKMMaW0bVvpzTm38wtw+bIsWmtwnl/IDTBq33doKb3rurKKUqqkxDmHfDA33Pj7eOQjur8F S/Fl+K/TB6FeAgwAuSQWIwoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTM4IDAgb2JqPDwvTGVuZ3RoIDE3 My9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lkdGggMTY3L0hlaWdodCAxL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQg OC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDM5IDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpI iWJgIA2ER33AgyBqvqMCuF40kTVIAK4ATZwgWLt27YYNGzZt2rRr1669e/ceBIMLFy5cuXIFbm9b W9vMmTOnTp0K4b4Dgw8fPgDJFy9ePAeDx48f379/H6jr7Nmz+/btAxoFNBBoLNyQajDo6uqqrKys qqpqamoCkkB2d3d3fX19RUVFQ0MDpr8wAf4AJANBLG1ubq6rqwM6o6OjA8gAOglPfAEEGAAw//Y0 Cg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xMzkgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggMTA4L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURl Y29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjQvSGVpZ2h0IDEvQml0c1BlckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMzkg MCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlPj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJYmDAAsKjPpCKIBq/IwGI OcjimIavAQOI+BqqArhfpk6dWl1dDWRsQAKkGtLU1FRRUdHT0zNz5syurq7Kysrm5magsUAGkDtt 2jSsXiAjGMkI84kTJwKd19bWBnEPEOCKQYAAAwDo3fchCg0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xNDAg MCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggOTQvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dpZHRoIDE2Ni9IZWlnaHQgMS9C aXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAzOSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUv SW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIkKj/oQTlXEAAbfYQDIRhOHMLDqXUMbwIAEKDdh6tSps2fPnjVr1oQJ EyZPntzc3FxRUVFZWdnU1NTT0wO3hbqhSkyYA8GUKVOqq6srwKChoQFrUAMEGAAkLAGbCg0KZW5k c3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag0xNDEgMCBvYmo8PC9MZW5ndGggNzUvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL1dp ZHRoIDE2Ny9IZWlnaHQgMi9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDgvQ29sb3JTcGFjZSAxNCAwIFIvVHlw ZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSIliYMADGBkZmRihDCRhZpIBIyMLELCy sXNwcqEYhddybg52TkailONWRKo7GXl4+fj4+AU4BYl0JihshLg4OcFOAAgwAEWwAkgKDQplbmRz dHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTE0MiAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCA1NC9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvV2lk dGggMTY4L0hlaWdodCAxL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDM5IDAgUi9UeXBl L1hPYmplY3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIiQqP+hA+ZNGagQDIDmBAAg0NDRMmTJgy ZUpXVxdccAADB+6GSjBoampCdg9AgAEAqwMOYQoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTQzIDAgb2Jq PDwvTGVuZ3RoIDMyL0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAxNjkvSGVpZ2h0IDIvQml0c1Bl ckNvbXBvbmVudCA4L0NvbG9yU3BhY2UgMTIgMCBSL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdl Pj5zdHJlYW0NCkiJYmCgMmAEAxySTGBAknlkaBkwAHYoQIABABohACUKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5k b2JqDTE0NCAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCAyMTQ2L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCAzNzUv SGVpZ2h0IDYyL0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xvclNwYWNlIDEzIDAgUi9UeXBlL1hPYmpl Y3QvU3VidHlwZS9JbWFnZT4+c3RyZWFtDQpIieyXC3vaNhSGz6MmFMytCSFATG1DgADdus1J2Jau 7NJ17H7L//8vO5KOZMmWG2dNSxL8PU8bIR3LPq/lT0eMlSpV6iPqiUPbfqYdUIm9sPb2UXt3M1eJ vYgqT6ugVfPq7z1hif1mNWqSdxMlW632rSZ4lqMSe74ODpFz56h7TOr1Bxx84xZTlNhvrRNk7PeO bfWxs1p8jhJ7nobP2TDwsv1IvZmGzuUDHBaevMSeoyGELMJ/adUBBg7oqO4tuJfYczSCwItgPA44 eS84jah/YlCfzlA9k/tZwdlL7DlCrx5H+A/gOQthFIDk3gaYSsjzjqofO33ifgSwEFGL/SUqvcc2 lkKNp8vlixeffJqF/vLFZ6jPEfjnvPFFuiw1p6XJsuLFbN3LG80+1f1SJExmJP4CsBibXC2QjKei cDxHCfJU1TThggct6H1YGV6uwNaXGeo0sHryFbVOrEcyp51Avur1dwwCTD4Swf+liLxdYkcFvBcT ktSx46IiIyvtluI+hxbv2Yemj5I/SJy6LwQd/n8HVlnqchy+li0sSw/MRzKm3VOTZTWAqysY5I3y 6fc+EsL/Ixu76vXI2QewujSCq8p6cKnhzyX48kcSwalP1Quj0Fc29om8qgfwDTTp4zk0H8mYdp8i HJrhNwizvFE+6f4HRvc+iuA0UthHEIayqHktPWYq8SZaSyL4OnjJmcVuUl/J0RnAS5P6K4powrcK e8/eo3cBOwuQO2GPRwCnMe+khDA1O7hBS/gIvmMO7Bb1BlmSDxPbYmZyBvheYec/DJvZCexO5WFn hFUOpLFb1C+5JdGPVxmLwSL0hycau20zWez9At4uHvjBeLtbb2BOxFJ12Jpn2sTy5oplsKeoM5bY zI+K+lsKAfj2iYHdspks9maBSoaueSCVjFuUORoEtK0BlenKiCLsGepM2cwA1kT9J5Dv04fVZrP5 ObEQtJlfNlzMjf3Gul1d80DqdreUh4uyvWpmwDPd3x+KtoU9S50ZNvNWYl9DhyzmVxs7t5l3Yb/J px1F1UPUSu1WfbG418v9RTbIzFVT74JRdJLNzAF+MiwGX8NvmwT7jGzm9xL7FS13ztGXvtK6Sn+3 Rq4m9XVS6r8km+kIm0ksZrIxsDe7hs2wncaO63SgDeB4OvflrrZuV4yYJNcTSKgfGhHP/tA286e2 mJm0mAQ7GDbDdhs7gjS4C1py1deSA5TOFYObLurs2TOyGVzLf/2tLebVxsaujq2/7zx2zr3Zs8Ef T/sdvsWqkGVStclXlKbOxPGoK8n9A9BXhpPCDonNsB3HLoxjkAZ/3BvglnkiIxLsOdQRu7IZXMsS odhe09gTm2Fu7OdpXdWtGz0e7OygxtfxUZo8wgXJXedKdpShLpTYTE/i/3ezSWFfJTbDCh+XLO6P CDsW6TV5AJxPLfADylnlqjYBJHuZnUQdmuBIregM9p8TmzlwYe/OMhqAZ97kUWFHnUnyNvoBTPgY 5ZpsvR3ZnxIdmnrav7PYf0tsxoXdIR+W5j0eG3ZUY7mW6LXfYDHSZjpX2UX9VccEKx3XpUNRGvsm sZmzEnsiQi9PNvzs2mIW9r4wbo41faZiic0I9984sf9q2MzuYm8sl2+wWrA7hd/0Fb+Gib2vihHf ae9VPbrauLFvDJvJYvebGaXe76PAPqFiIcWdLZDfPFlsGjtSV0bShLVjwpXcT5FVHnbDZopVMvYu 8hiw7+EO6s9nM4BFeuiCFmUfXifYkXobjWTG29Psy2ImlVzshs24jktp7eXd4OFKOarrcCir7+MZ nOtc+2KDvQKYyhGHvbup2GfQqraZHT2lLrQVZ+uSc7moTeyyrEFn6uTaexHsLLGZ3cSulnTX4TIt F3YxcgnSwF32Xgh7Q9vMR8AeQJA3FBad465Vo4KlmVnuDf0hXGVyPSNsaO8XqcsKYU9sZpvYh9v7 YtrkF9308edSFSwdeJrN9ZCwzTP2Xgy7tpmjD499GA3dA+H2sFfIZfhu2Won/e0V7Zu4oCuOXNVL wfr8wJqwIHZlM9M7we6FXjwORteyOQxGMTZOg1OPBvH/63EQhDH/HYdBMMZQLwAQQ9tQjZY7X+8A tSUv2ZZV3p4SV27fmVwbqqzH06g1X0Hs2mbuBHtAFf5QNeNY/j1lZDJDGRAjf9m6lpG5tv+BVVH8 5AFUi86oPeki2Vwv6L30UvZeFLv+XtLYHWo1brgBJxiFAiJvBsDGuJJ5z5iwY+9zD2DE2CmA95y3 trraOb+uyr/X95so/0j1TGkxO3JdU8mfsvfC2BvJfW/Cbt0hB3vMOOqYN4csZoIwG/Eojj0SXwJy ZzGyRls/Dbfq7Uxsj5p7WgOybkeuuopEezdmK4zdsBkDu1M+LN99A1msINuIY1dN3RNwwmEY4luI aIRru9g597kzXTQQqIsQV65GFXmY9BbHntjM3WLXTRu71D3Czrl3etlsjwBWJzLCCbNK9t6lw2t+ pBu7tpk7wM5/edxJJHbcNz3Zc62wxzJ0KEauwyjeOnbu79DpT62V7mPfoSoO3TAnMBCxfXit+26B XdvMXWAPCT4djkTVEtMmG/DXIAJGfCQQpn8PsLNKTXyCA78/Q839gSggzvR4Q9UU1lV1veW1b4hc qMCF1b1KgnXETVuq6waqgAw19kgUNFRSBqJ+oQBPtsZMOs/7cXtvVdprO9OadfxstESqJ/ZFJy1J oF0wMu/6k6TtUuumR0GyY4lSYRfcBXXZE4+IOtHmofE9wM419Javz1Fvll59289yKwkfQbe2NIyG ehAVRzpAt6L0NaVuoyD/tBmN5Vm11N3rHdi5+WztKPrI5YW5ZMMgKKmXKlWqVKlSpUqVup/6T4AB ANwbSsoKDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTE0NSAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0aCA0Mjk1L0ZpbHRlci9G bGF0ZURlY29kZS9XaWR0aCA2MjAvSGVpZ2h0IDM0NS9CaXRzUGVyQ29tcG9uZW50IDQvQ29sb3JT cGFjZSAxMSAwIFIvVHlwZS9YT2JqZWN0L1N1YnR5cGUvSW1hZ2U+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSInsl0ty3DgS hs8gALYVvQPFC8BAS4rZoZA9o1k62j6AQhHeO9wRXte4F77GRMxBBwCLL/BdBFEsKb9Fii+AwF/8 U5k3NwiCjEOo1ADvpJCS+gBaX3pN+8YLRmvB5LMLml94WQiC3FAN1o28Mmed1y68sP0iJQPRFcwF dtmVIQhCBfSa0wVFLrmyHUOU7k9pLvzroktDkLcOV60WKgzAL7i2vULkSEpzLai86PIQ5E1DcvZl OKV5h15yeTsl/4OO/COwQfELrg5B3jYTRYcNt8fLrW6fEAbj/whsIPxy60OQt03OxosOG+CS69sl 0lBUDUH2Cck/yTs65VA0aBtmvC7fxlS7E9kll4ggbxfvwem8dqnlXYI7wiee+AJ0slSTVOnNlogg bxSqNAADDWb4GaYnzenDgW+71t2QMTipBnSw2DLTgvkgNl8ugrwxJKscykD0PkLYTIcynmDBe4CW ghWB9zxCcjojpXnVkiwZQd4Qqu1Q0J0nuJlVdNgANM2ao0LuxGDBNTSEQ6Bap9TNZha4TrXz144g r5vSaodlw6gIHQokeARmNlPX6NDBTY/DdEe1IKOzmaWaDWppVkWQt0G7K1o0spvXWr0kVXS+QztF y76Bs1XrVrnARONubuh81Rb+J0KQN4Je41DqDfaxMcGBVzfnt6AuiFW7SAysUq2ClxnOiOra/Bb0 6lRDkDQQFjREK9oaepqlnDqf34LaoDvz7RaSs5Zq62om2VKNmW+vVDUESUXToVTylbNlxVTFNJTO LzpsALHy5QlhVUqTK/4NVAg/lfDHOV2kmhQR3o8gr4yy6OCR5vNtlXZH0tDX6lB+Ui3ahKxSDZYI 5v4bRFsDgrwaikrBxJuQqnI++UJfq0ML1dY1ny1K1d4/L/pHcF2qIUgqfDMlIk7oHXq4uf25rFST ksmIq9gYr1rMCU95jZnXrBqCJCJzDo1qDZIz51C6sAV1IeYyNkU61eJOyZhVTX74vjivZXHXgSCv gCmHSldHyI/hZWqHUW8r68bQWRQ0LE1pbqrVm0nGqGpUaVD0XjjpROM6sacv1X4VUNEeJ4V53aoh SCqcQ+nQPVZ3RTZ9ifJ6Bo0bNrjT1kD66h1qVSP9d/Ii35cB/l3eAEODTSvdGsn0QsHotamGIKnQ YPouEwhd9l2yA/fVSJ/BWrOYBb6swzU5lIPuuUpY396U5hnrSvLDhh+Noi0cNlc17EMRZB4kp/0+ OgwaTLEqs/W6e05Itb2NyA3t35uCgRs2LcF/i8Fk8JGpkGp7CHLVZNoM+Wjwhgv6wG98Tnw8AjDQ PsjHkRGt8O6qHdotcE/hvRqW0wfQxKU+ZgX7Qh+P8pGdpLPh90+Y1xAkBgyGLDRk3VPghTlN925x A25/th3/ihxKh4rUe2bG0tL7F1fqjmW9IU2rHyXlNhHkShm00Kj95IM/Gs6JVXg3aNMrdqgcVu12 VI0iTKtGTxmue+MXT7hPBLlKOHTLqCIo6F4LKw9f0j2MP1cEV751b6TbZ1x60k2p2tPAjXaYaFWb vwIz4dh0+0SQq4Stdx6Yec8VD7eTm0620ZhQNbDBD1L/OVOIv5eoFtTFOt1WEeQKYWEtUIVZnVIR 1Mzn+pJbsp3GhKFqCLJfJFW6z0KPf7MFplvsUJcAinJQpdtrPGxasUmGyYZ09hS0uzZXAx0UrouS 2yMmNgQZREJ5pE6+rALNJl3WGHGOQ4vkVq3gekDVEGTPQFYdBQ41bKyjCu18rkP9VCLJViNSFUs8 UM0IAnowGYUSr1HNZccUW0WQq4Pw6lAEptPu4p2yR8r7SFHV48soDqWut9p2o1EhvDpE1RBkd+S6 Pg5MJ6obxFko491HIjrUlR+iKh13jtKN47YQvOfxDVX7Sh81iOgbRJCrxoj6mLVN1/N0WJxEzWtU PkvFZOelO8SI+hhVQ5CdQQ68PqGue6pM1/f4xg71QRsRe5exobpxQnI2odqGfWgdFJDo+0SQ66Tl 0BvCar+ZnqdJEoe6jrS3nYvLnTh7KKqGIHum7dCbm3GH0kQOtQHkpuVHDuwjP3t0qJrci2oSmDh7 VxMQt0u61ewIEpFWH+rgYw4d7ahoXIdKqnQWcaclwuUSfVg1B6qGILvGiOACOZmu9xsecaihsR36 0WYLwmNt1JHZldqZmVw7kdKdS1QN5jU+otpvsVWT4qvsX8Z5EF78tIrFmxNBNibX/o/9bBstqPdH 7+NswKHC/IPGd6gLGniMfRJpV+onNWL9bLn2f1A1BNklhMvq2y3Dw7fCGs55PHyedR3qSjuzgTlP AdjazoraRbqpMtumiZVzeWwRM9JB+uq1PYB1VHPrEBuqZn9VzldskSpmxMfTVBHrPwTZGvvv+Ok4 aRKXFFrDVO1QUVzJ9OAEEMWmPneeg119I3lE8SeqhiD7xVZkGZ39z19/4YMzERjx1khhsySww/D7 h+Cq/fL1zRm1JezLotQCVAzNJcX9y9DYsq9dG4rCcAEkd9VmOcFXqvTaahlBEpGJxre7INhPvmc2 Nj6MjWS9RUEB4bO32MkM9nT24H5QNQTZL3SNZ+xYHkw3OUKvNuf9S3GkdLu5G9qh6rzyF+FjIybJ 1LotaCNa8+VmYkSxhWY/uCL0ZtY2FFj3h4LFOiHIJaAa7ulKpyj2H15NyCc7zZNDo3Wko70VAW2y 7jBY102hagiyXyQz603y3ZnOnD55qpX7Rw9meMTJoX98Zu70duUKHqjrrWzZ2Le/vD8LqDFPTxIp tRQL9zOS3KU5qxqwcdVA2+d8Worwu1nt7SsP4fayoR8PNF+hGoKkocgv6/1x/0Lvn30FYFtaUzjA uFMYd6gsTBzFofTkPAByJ24y+46R7MM0qpZYNQTZCga6PqEjpcHZAUx15PzhK7chhzqnuHD7dIy+ jPFHFJ2vWea3IMpTFakLbIdqUlX8KKwvuTnVWKUa7RN2y3CqLBFkX4BvD4G5Y+eKrzT4dsfboJmh MN3JnP6oWwGoY9lM+YefjmkdChpV21g1BElF6VAQeU/RUd3V6x1g6Mnxxl9TwaTOl1A7lJl05nRB i7NU0+W26lDeiKJaWQmqk2rNo0q16ii1aqCXiIYgyZCVB03w2SoW1aF1+VG/qFl+2LunHHEBhzKJ qm2vGoIkI2P9lUejJInkUFsUBVngRbVaLaidvL6JWxIUXSxbLU5jqo9t1cwZa7l/6V4Lfhmn0LFW rTpKrJqCxaIhSDJIXhmx/mxVndLO+e4fGXwyYadJ5Tdbzry0Hn5f5bpmhqvarzQBNKqWRjUESUTG jJChG9997q3h5obaYBBazb0t8Id/R9BbpTKnC1osFw3IXd1z1gvv703nJopa7E6C+uPT8MP1y1Op 9sOpxherhiBpuD1WvV+r3WSrHNpqzlhgSaWDEZ0qo15GisCAo2opVEOQRDDTshUD/WevYZcFpX/7 X+s0uBvYvuPQ21TmLLZqFoomG43nSbWfMVQTJG9da1Vf06olDYrphaohSCLytjVUt/I4nvvJM9a6 1nzRX6FDPz8tfkfEAKhaCtUQJBFHM/ztMu/Qcz55OLi5KQvnq06rLFCNMEvfETH80stEk+Hq16v2 1WnA/ezh2LpKezq2bvwY+/G2D7BQNQRJg0s8D+EX+6F1aujiT56BLueH8O7vn5m3/cO31g3QlzJn 4VCOqm2tGoIkIj/DftMBCC9fQDoOdeE5vKZY73On8GuLRQYOFfNF4/DPDVagmj3dmBqNEcM1oU2C 8vanBuNPP0xNlUA1BEnEaDN1blD60PcOYGZ4hOm58WLd2Lzx4E934FBU7RzVECQRDJ7jf+3swFsv qbIAcyVEdwT0Wzcbmn4jh8pWWhmBbrECxXjwGl3f7SjklDT0YWzSZiJ7tgH4Nqo9zVQNQVKhaPQP XRvReU27rFD/Z79aktvGgegZiEZsV3ageAEYiJMthF5km5pcwOUq76c8VV5POZXyFeYKc8ppUBR/ +IiSaDlT6beAZaL58Njia3U7sil2S36+LBQP9/ImDrUQS+esrZU1BuNCMB5WfMdD9yBRo4/O0f54 vmLxON6hX35IdObuymgbKkM6TuKCpKlUy3lmZagrsFLPT/r6cjTVp9Lu0d8CVVGS1gFsstmmxUbK GYx3A2TcffLSNx3kgOlRFinku5F+OZ8vHXScNJQuenib1uI0Z+0tssZgXAj0M7umQ+mV76ml8yi9 Hs6y2+5MjWFjCd9LYfcIh0qcV4v++SOWDdxqdOWsUUO6YtbQCzXKWivXDFnrtdShx/SH+V5/wnM+ a0+LVIVZN0jLJCDZ9e2/XwbjvSGX1ZficvcAXfGYUnceRLjdXWiGmgd0bjsKoi/Sb8H8ma8HLQF+ +B5tvMIX1+5+femv5TIANlEFrKxz8Zy1U7PGYFwI4XV8PNeh5jMEu8y5hWodip6aIh9MOurlKtHs CW661mCgGjEX/WtfOzJFTdawYd3+07+jtiLr0ErIfyjk44wedT5rJPf+7LoWFucjbthpRlWFEVSa qtlOdkcE2Qr3CfqymVhQpp5pzLwkaxUkelaBTuXvYDAuAzMUlDOW0EKomDw4VHq9/7fWerKtfERl 77tmYrQY/ZA/XG4T51LdGerGEodW1d+RliuTH0Y5azsclzUG41I406F32jQStSImvY3IqV8r2qLx MWlC4s5lT2kFjUtOPvvHcrDModXNjwS9hXTw+XUNoZNtI/mg0ZSUQsRndSJMWYRH/TmnAFNpq7td J5o+riSF0iYTWZOqfBOD8cY4z6ES3WBBgUJNyUG78ulyyndHi07FiXDQY05GdG57tlWtQ0MdoLjr p0MOpRLjzPOU+RZ8Ug9nbcDyrDEYl8LpDqVpx4hGj7nAugn5QYdWgPNxKXeHwrwW6hjjG4RDL9um pHG7uANaCDaRjbgNPTlrNHh63Uobaann0oRKHTkBfpvT60zkBm/ygpxR0Q3KbEQnw4cvNNkNTyES 2Ui2gwzGhVAf7dAXS2VE9wRmZELpqtpP6Kf/JdH46Rk2GynQ5aVhZmQ8EmDDGbcT5jiKszYFLMoa g3ExtO3CBgqWfBi9rBKdmxFY2f80024laJQZNhc4lMYlrzejI2WhsSo1SuhU/sYjgLOSYUhfFETX lpU0S22jqNScopG98SkkrKPELslaGAD95PFVPtQk5d7Rcm1c4ulOQI3zM6xbg5fBOA2SfmuvHgvm DNXM9MVGNHIyY0hZO91TtX8alO3fw3NoTzo98lsplArFdUaplauMP6KZtzhx0eCsRUcsyBqDcTnU YUiK33Z0iNJoFcWb3pIEIDfabqyC/XVh3FZVyx0ablHYH27LHcsmknvff3Lb4q1LgbPGMCVIQMjQ PgSN7P5VGU49IhFUS8CK9jPo/rKyWAnljlFa216kLU+VNJH62Zc8lKBCk7wcVL2n7xDoNWgZjMtA 4GCh9td+NwaBHsdIHNe/ZdAWPxh9u4GtKgdurEw7ND03noB6VAWeqWgdELQAnDUG49eGsG73AXbT E3UjBvbXzgR1LXIBVa0x5dDHsKyiA4Yq8ARtB3o+ZdcZ7bNW2TCvns+7I4e/llBtUP7xhk1b28eO SNdpoBmMi0HSC4ziXSVs9HxkbBdciV5Qje1J7fUqnJKzxmAwDkGim3duazk0AOy+/ZDrNDS/CAQV N4l6M7RWa2atEgr9jhn1mrwMxm8F3YSZjrzq9ercAqzz5H23PvU7g7PGYPzWAEkFoH5vFf9DaMtZ OxX/CTAA2FCENQoNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMTQ2IDAgb2JqPDwvVHlwZS9FeHRHU3RhdGUv U0EgZmFsc2UvT1AgZmFsc2UvU00gMC4wMi9vcCBmYWxzZS9PUE0gMT4+DWVuZG9iag0xIDAgb2Jq PDwvTnVtc1swIDIgMCBSXT4+DWVuZG9iag0yIDAgb2JqPDwvUy9EPj4NZW5kb2JqDTMgMCBvYmo8 PC9Db3VudCAxL0tpZHNbOSAwIFJdL1R5cGUvUGFnZXM+Pg1lbmRvYmoNNCAwIG9iajw8L0xlbmd0 aCAzMzY4L1R5cGUvTWV0YWRhdGEvU3VidHlwZS9YTUw+PnN0cmVhbQ0KPD94cGFja2V0IGJlZ2lu PSfvu78nIGlkPSdXNU0wTXBDZWhpSHpyZVN6TlRjemtjOWQnPz4KPD9hZG9iZS14YXAtZmlsdGVy cyBlc2M9IkNSTEYiPz4NCjx4OnhtcG1ldGEgeG1sbnM6eD0nYWRvYmU6bnM6bWV0YS8nIHg6eG1w dGs9J1hNUCB0b29sa2l0IDIuOS4xLTEzLCBmcmFtZXdvcmsgMS42Jz4NCjxyZGY6UkRGIHhtbG5z OnJkZj0naHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMTk5OS8wMi8yMi1yZGYtc3ludGF4LW5zIycgeG1sbnM6 aVg9J2h0dHA6Ly9ucy5hZG9iZS5jb20vaVgvMS4wLyc+DQo8cmRmOkRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIHJkZjph Ym91dD0ndXVpZDpkZGYxZTc0Yy01ZTEwLTQyZmUtYmM3MS03NTBmYmU4YWRiZWUnIHhtbG5zOnBk Zj0naHR0cDovL25zLmFkb2JlLmNvbS9wZGYvMS4zLycgcGRmOlByb2R1Y2VyPSdBY3JvYmF0IERp c3RpbGxlciA2LjAgKFdpbmRvd3MpJz48L3JkZjpEZXNjcmlwdGlvbj4NCjxyZGY6RGVzY3JpcHRp b24gcmRmOmFib3V0PSd1dWlkOmRkZjFlNzRjLTVlMTAtNDJmZS1iYzcxLTc1MGZiZThhZGJlZScg eG1sbnM6eGFwPSdodHRwOi8vbnMuYWRvYmUuY29tL3hhcC8xLjAvJyB4YXA6Q3JlYXRvclRvb2w9 J1BTY3JpcHQ1LmRsbCBWZXJzaW9uIDUuMicgeGFwOk1vZGlmeURhdGU9JzIwMDYtMDQtMjBUMTI6 MTU6MTkrMDE6MDAnIHhhcDpDcmVhdGVEYXRlPScyMDA2LTA0LTIwVDEyOjE0OjE2KzAxOjAwJyB4 YXA6TWV0YWRhdGFEYXRlPScyMDA2LTA0LTIwVDEyOjE1OjE5KzAxOjAwJz48L3JkZjpEZXNjcmlw dGlvbj4NCjxyZGY6RGVzY3JpcHRpb24gcmRmOmFib3V0PSd1dWlkOmRkZjFlNzRjLTVlMTAtNDJm ZS1iYzcxLTc1MGZiZThhZGJlZScgeG1sbnM6eGFwTU09J2h0dHA6Ly9ucy5hZG9iZS5jb20veGFw LzEuMC9tbS8nIHhhcE1NOkRvY3VtZW50SUQ9J3V1aWQ6ZmE2MjFlMTItM2U2NC00ZjQyLTg4YTMt NWRmMGU0ZjZkZWUzJy8+DQo8cmRmOkRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIHJkZjphYm91dD0ndXVpZDpkZGYxZTc0 Yy01ZTEwLTQyZmUtYmM3MS03NTBmYmU4YWRiZWUnIHhtbG5zOmRjPSdodHRwOi8vcHVybC5vcmcv ZGMvZWxlbWVudHMvMS4xLycgZGM6Zm9ybWF0PSdhcHBsaWNhdGlvbi9wZGYnPjxkYzp0aXRsZT48 cmRmOkFsdD48cmRmOmxpIHhtbDpsYW5nPSd4LWRlZmF1bHQnPk1pY3Jvc29mdCBXb3JkIC0gSE9Q RTYuZG9jPC9yZGY6bGk+PC9yZGY6QWx0PjwvZGM6dGl0bGU+PGRjOmNyZWF0b3I+PHJkZjpTZXE+ PHJkZjpsaT5HZWY8L3JkZjpsaT48L3JkZjpTZXE+PC9kYzpjcmVhdG9yPjwvcmRmOkRlc2NyaXB0 aW9uPg0KPC9yZGY6UkRGPg0KPC94OnhtcG1ldGE+DQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAK ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCjw/eHBhY2tldCBlbmQ9J3cnPz4NCmVuZHN0cmVh bQ1lbmRvYmoNNSAwIG9iajw8L01vZERhdGUoRDoyMDA2MDQyMDEyMTUxOSswMScwMCcpL0NyZWF0 aW9uRGF0ZShEOjIwMDYwNDIwMTIxNDE2KzAxJzAwJykvVGl0bGUoTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgLSBI T1BFNi5kb2MpL0NyZWF0b3IoUFNjcmlwdDUuZGxsIFZlcnNpb24gNS4yKS9BdXRob3IoR2VmKS9Q cm9kdWNlcihBY3JvYmF0IERpc3RpbGxlciA2LjAgXChXaW5kb3dzXCkpPj4NZW5kb2JqDXhyZWYN CjAgNg0KMDAwMDAwMDAwMCA2NTUzNSBmDQowMDAwMDQ1MjUxIDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwNDUyODQg MDAwMDAgbg0KMDAwMDA0NTMwNyAwMDAwMCBuDQowMDAwMDQ1MzU3IDAwMDAwIG4NCjAwMDAwNDg4 MDEgMDAwMDAgbg0KdHJhaWxlcg0KPDwvU2l6ZSA2Pj4NCnN0YXJ0eHJlZg0KMTE2DQolJUVPRg0K ------=_Part_4617_9010508.1145532547769-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 17:01:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7294916A413 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from donaldjoneill@gmail.com) Received: from smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8605743D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:01:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from donaldjoneill@gmail.com) Received: (qmail 70533 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 16:44:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pres1750.airedalians.com) (donaldj@ameritech.net@75.7.74.134 with plain) by smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 May 2006 16:44:28 -0000 From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:44:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605081144.15286.donaldjoneill@gmail.com> Cc: Jonathan Horne , Ceri Davies Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:01:22 -0000 On Monday 08 May 2006 10:55, Ceri Davies wrote: > On 8/5/06 15:39, "Jonathan Horne" wrote: > > on a dev box, did a cvsup and buildworld yesterday... and now my > > kernel says 6.1 stable! > > > > fbsd60-2# uname -a > > FreeBSD fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: > > Sun May 7 18:33:48 CDT 2006 > > root@fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FBSD60-2 i386 > > > > *shrug* i look on freebsd.org, but i didnt see an announcement > > about it yet. how close to release does this put us? > > It essentially means that the release has been finished, and is being > built/uploaded. > > Ceri It's sitting on the mirror sites, if you look. I downloaded one this morning. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 17:03:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA0116A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:03:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E0843D53 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd98Z-000CAO-Sc; Mon, 08 May 2006 18:03:11 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 18:03:11 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: "Donald J. O'Neill" Message-ID: <20060508170311.GE50982@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , "Donald J. O'Neill" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jonathan Horne References: <200605081144.15286.donaldjoneill@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605081144.15286.donaldjoneill@gmail.com> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: Jonathan Horne , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:03:14 -0000 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:44:15AM -0500, Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > On Monday 08 May 2006 10:55, Ceri Davies wrote: > > On 8/5/06 15:39, "Jonathan Horne" wrote: > > > on a dev box, did a cvsup and buildworld yesterday... and now my > > > kernel says 6.1 stable! > > > > > > fbsd60-2# uname -a > > > FreeBSD fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: > > > Sun May 7 18:33:48 CDT 2006 > > > root@fbsd60-2.dev.dfwlp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FBSD60-2 i386 > > > > > > *shrug* i look on freebsd.org, but i didnt see an announcement > > > about it yet. how close to release does this put us? > > > > It essentially means that the release has been finished, and is being > > built/uploaded. >=20 > It's sitting on the mirror sites, if you look. I downloaded one this=20 > morning. Yes, I know, but until it is announced, you can't be guaranteed that those bits are the right ones. The delay allows us to make sure that all mirrors have it before they start getting hammered. Ceri --=20 That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEX3nPocfcwTS3JF8RAiYbAJ9JyN5FXOmFaKYzmO7ZKbpxGdGbzQCggIeF 8E3/6z9ylVWv9mQYUaag/uA= =9w7t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 17:05:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBF816A414 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (smtp.thilelli.net [62.212.120.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2C743D4C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:05:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B25828450; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:05:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at thilelli.net Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id q9b6UHJJrjqT; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:05:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36BB28444; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:05:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.101 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel) by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:05:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <60956.192.168.1.101.1147107908.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <20060508153209.GA54676@bento.thilelli.net> References: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04390A59@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> <20060508153209.GA54676@bento.thilelli.net> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:05:08 +0200 (CEST) From: "Julien Gabel" To: "Zimmerman, Eric" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Dave , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: php4 port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:05:12 -0000 >>> Is there any known issues or things to watch out for when doing the >>> latest php4 upgrade? The notes in the UPDATING file indicated a change >>> in the status of the .cli binary. If one has mod_php4 and the >>> php4-extensions already installed is the upgrade a smooth one? >> Mine seemed to go fine via portmanager after doing a make config in the >> php4 directory as UPDATING indicates to do. No issues so far that I have >> seen > Using portupgrade, i had to recompile all php4-* found in /var/db/pkg and > the dependancies. All went well, except for the SSL support i use throuth > squirrelmail. I use different knobs in the past in order to be able to > access imaps via squirrelmail, the last one was "WITH_OPENSSL_BASE". But > according to the current ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk makefile, it seems > deprecated in favor of "WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes". So i tried: > # portupgrade -rRf -m 'WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes' squirrelmail > instead of: > # portupgrade -rRf -m '-DWITH_OPENSSL_BASE' squirrelmail > without much success for the moment... ... but switching-on the "Build static OpenSSL extension" knob using `make config' in the ports/lang/php4 directory do the trick. So, the upgrade went relatively well. -- Julien Gabel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 17:06:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F6016A447 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:06:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFFA43D70 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:06:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k48H6dtR027455; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:06:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <445F7A9A.40607@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 12:06:34 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060426 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marty Landman References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:06:42 -0000 Marty Landman wrote: > I've just reinstalled FBSD 4.8 from the mini-iso on an old box (PII-133 > w/ 3 > GB on two hd's). The problem I'm running into is that my ports are looking > for old, outdated packages, I think. > > So going from > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.htmltried > > to install cvsup to do a port upgrade: > > mrwilhelm# pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > Error: FTP Unable to get > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.8-release/Latest/cvsup-without-gui.tgz: > > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > pkg_add: unable to fetch ' > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.8-release/Latest/cvsup-without-gui.tgz' > > by URL > mrwilhelm# > > Same problem though, how can I tell my system where to get access to > the 4.8stuff? > Somewhere back in 2004? :-D Seriously, if you can find any package at all, I'd try it. I don't know that cvsup changes that much. You can use fetch or FTP to grab from a newer location and add the package directly, e.g. # cd # fetch ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/path/to/some/real.pkg.tbz # pkg_add real.pkg.tbz HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- Consultants are mystical people who ask a company for a number and then give it back to them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 17:21:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45EC16A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbridges@iastate.edu) Received: from mailhub-3.iastate.edu (mailhub-3.iastate.edu [129.186.140.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B4D43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:21:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sbridges@iastate.edu) Received: from mailout-1.iastate.edu (mailout-1.iastate.edu [129.186.140.1]) by mailhub-3.iastate.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with SMTP id k48HLlLR007772; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:21:47 -0500 Received: from bridgespc.econ.iastate.edu(129.186.32.12) by mailout-1.iastate.edu via smtp id 2c8f_a860389c_deb7_11da_867d_00304811d932; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:25:33 +0000 From: "Stephanie Bridges" To: "'Lennon Cook'" Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:21:47 -0500 Message-ID: <010501c672c3$e2e7a960$0c20ba81@econ.iastate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <76ebe6440605051707m2f07cfaauaf17adaabeda9148@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZwof3+luwARANlTE+DquCeH5pWXACIPJUg Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Problem with cordless mouse/Keyboard combo set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:21:48 -0000 Lennon Cook wrote: > Stephanie Bridges wrote: >> I had the same problem with the mouse (would occasionally move the >> cursor, never any clicks) until I accidentally got the receiver >> closer to the mouse. I now have the receiver about three inches >> away from the mouse. Works wonderfully well now. > Thanks Stephanie, but unfortunately that didn't help here. I > have moved my receiver so close to the mouse that its hard to > not bump them, but the mouse still doesn't work. > > What I have noticed since I sent my original message, is that > /dev/sysmouse exists even when only the non-working mouse is > connected nto the system. Does this mean that FreeBSD /is/ > detecting the mouse (and hence that I should be looking > somewhere else than this list for the problem), or does that > file simply always exist? Lennon, Do you have a /dev/ums0 (my usb mouse device)? Also, even when my mouse didn't really work, disconnecting/reconnecting the receiver from the usb port (moving to another or leaving in the same port) would generate log messages that the mouse was being recognized correctly. I was assuming that /dev/sysmouse would only exist if the system thought there was a mouse somewhere, but I'm not sure about that. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stephanie Bridges Economics Department -- Iowa State University 80B Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011 ph: 515.294.8732 ~~ fax: 515.294.0221 http://www.econ.iastate.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 17:27:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D1A16A40B for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:27:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE3D43D5F for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:27:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k48HQxFb007264; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:26:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <445F7F5D.5040106@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 12:26:53 -0500 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marty Landman References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:27:04 -0000 Marty Landman wrote: > I've just reinstalled FBSD 4.8 from the mini-iso on an old box (PII-133 > w/ 3 > GB on two hd's). The problem I'm running into is that my ports are looking > for old, outdated packages, I think. > > So going from > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.htmltried > > to install cvsup to do a port upgrade: > > mrwilhelm# pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > Error: FTP Unable to get > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.8-release/Latest/cvsup-without-gui.tgz: > > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > pkg_add: unable to fetch ' > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.8-release/Latest/cvsup-without-gui.tgz' > > by URL > mrwilhelm# > > Same problem though, how can I tell my system where to get access to > the 4.8stuff? I don't think there is any /easy/ way for you to continue using 4.8, which is not officially supported. If you install 4.11 you will have better luck with ports and packages (for as long as 4.11 is supported, anyway... the 4.x line is still widely used, but is EOL except for security updates). Someone may be able to provide you with a 4.8 workaround for a cvsup package (OK, I see someone did already!), but that may only be the beginning of a long train of workarounds you'd need. Using 4.11 will provide somewhat more of a panacea. If you have enough RAM, go ahead and install 5.4 or 6.0 (or soon enough, 6.1). -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 17:31:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3A716A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:31:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor.lundwall@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070CE43D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:31:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victor.lundwall@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so1263413ugf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 10:31:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lIjFnLRHxnh/tilXAgapxSQepKRKFvYLKjyr2dPa2mccZxuPJcPPKk5XhVKz7pINIl1asN4PsIY7b4MFc86oAIx5U+Fb45vB9wpEWa1FnEDn3YOE94zd2oZ/wWniKF5AbsR6rcZIWomkL25H6vwcpCy13UyjyJbKhdpCqBYGxZE= Received: by 10.67.87.4 with SMTP id p4mr1291307ugl; Mon, 08 May 2006 10:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.123.176? ( [81.231.9.118]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id j1sm1822231ugf.2006.05.08.10.31.03; Mon, 08 May 2006 10:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <445F804E.9040809@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 19:30:54 +0200 From: Victor Lundwall User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060414) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Kukulies References: <200605081557.k48FvOo4072890@www.kukulies.org> In-Reply-To: <200605081557.k48FvOo4072890@www.kukulies.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=95E040FC; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x95E040FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: could not determine fs type - fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:31:07 -0000 Christoph Kukulies wrote: > I replaced a disk that had trouble with fsck in a 5.3 system and connected it > to a 5.2.1 system for further examinaton. > > starting fsck /dev/ad3 gave me an error: could not determine file system type. > > Had there been some change in FS right between FreeBSD 5.2 and 5.3 such that > either systems couldn't recognize each others FSs? > -- > Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_kukulies.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Don't you haft to have a specific partition and slice? So it should be something like fsck_ufs /dev/ad3s1a? Else way try fsck_ufs /dev/ad3. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 17:41:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095D916A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E24A43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:41:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.66.115]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060508174150.UVGA14145.mta10.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:41:50 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF65DB76B; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:42:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:42:09 -0400 From: Parv To: Perttu Laine Message-ID: <20060508174209.GB973@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Perttu Laine , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <571463983.20060508130703@rulez.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:41:52 -0000 in message , wrote Perttu Laine thusly... > > Thank's. work fine. Now I have another question about 7-CURRENT. > portupgrade and portversion are giving this error: > --- > uname(1) could be broken - cannot parse the output: 7-CURRENT-SNAP009 i386 > ** Error occured reading /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf: > uninitialized constant PkgConfig::OS_PLATFORM > --- > > So. How can one make those pkgtools working? :) That seems like a bug in portupgrade (pkgtools.rb is installed as part of portupgrade) due to, most likely, limited set of rules to parse uname(1) output. Please file a problem report via send-pr(1). I can't help myself but look in source; here is the line 982 in pkgtools.rb (portupgrade 2.0.1_1,1) which fails to parse uname(1) output ... 980 uname = `uname -rm`.chomp 981 982 if m = /^(((\d+)(?:\.\d+[^.\-]*?)+)-(\w+)(-\S+)?) (\w+)$/.match(uname) ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ minor ^ version required minor version match 983 OS_RELEASE, OS_REVISION, OS_MAJOR, 984 OS_BRANCH, os_patchlevel, OS_PLATFORM = m[1..-1] 985 OS_PATCHLEVEL = os_patchlevel || "" (I don't know how close Ruby & Perl regular expressions (regexps) are, below analysis is according to Perl rules.) Above regex fails, when there is no minor version since matching of minor version is not optional. To get past that, regex should be ... /^(((\d+)(?:\.\d+[^.\-]*?)?)-(\w+)(-\S+)?) (\w+)$/ ^ ^ optional match - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 18:11:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8192616A506 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFCE43D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:11:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so894701wxc for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 11:11:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dO+LAtMNoGY/U80I2FvmBHgTQ4bDDVYgVUUTqysVzf2gxVwVq6KyW8tkAHMMoryHNTtECUbp3BNp5mqwiWGCKrd+a4pwS44kYr9BGqDVth2LF+RXWHnGZK0I++DjTSZ8fDp3pVidu5VYa3VqcrL4GHuw8oPi1R6Q8/SDXAy1bJg= Received: by 10.70.69.19 with SMTP id r19mr2663577wxa; Mon, 08 May 2006 11:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.115.11 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70063950605081111h1670934fy177bbf2b7e3074a5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:11:26 -0400 From: "Marty Landman" To: "Greg Barniskis" In-Reply-To: <445F7F5D.5040106@scls.lib.wi.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> <445F7F5D.5040106@scls.lib.wi.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 18:11:29 -0000 On 5/8/06, Greg Barniskis wrote: > > Marty Landman wrote: > > I've just reinstalled FBSD 4.8 from the mini-iso on an old box (PII-133 > > w/ 3 > > GB on two hd's). The problem I'm running into is that my ports are > looking > > for old, outdated packages, I think. If you have enough RAM, go ahead and install 5.4 or 6.0 (or soon enough, 6.= 1 > ). Hi Greg. My issue is that would like to continue using this box and - possibly because of the age of the cdrom - am having a problem installing with my 6.0 iso too. :( This box has 82M of ram, forgot to mention that. And it is running 4.8 with just about nothing on it, and it is networked with my office broadband connection. So, is there a simple way I could install over the net? And how high a release could I go? Obviously I won't be putting X windows on there but if = I can get Apache w/ mod_perl, Samba, Mysql and Perl it'll be a useful machine for my intranet. I had all that on before but apparently 4.8 isn't going to work for me now unless I have a time machine. Marty -- Web Installed Formmail - http://face2interface.com/formINSTal/ Webmaster's BBS - http://bbs.face2interface.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 18:42:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2A816A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DA143D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:42:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k48Ig6Dp010417; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:42:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <445F90F8.4070509@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:42:00 -0500 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marty Landman References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> <445F7F5D.5040106@scls.lib.wi.us> <70063950605081111h1670934fy177bbf2b7e3074a5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70063950605081111h1670934fy177bbf2b7e3074a5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 18:42:08 -0000 Marty Landman wrote: > On 5/8/06, Greg Barniskis wrote: >> >> Marty Landman wrote: >> > I've just reinstalled FBSD 4.8 from the mini-iso on an old box (PII-133 >> > w/ 3 >> > GB on two hd's). The problem I'm running into is that my ports are >> looking >> > for old, outdated packages, I think. > > > If you have enough RAM, go ahead and install 5.4 or 6.0 (or soon enough, > 6.1 >> ). > > > > Hi Greg. My issue is that would like to continue using this box and - > possibly because of the age of the cdrom - am having a problem installing > with my 6.0 iso too. :( > > This box has 82M of ram, forgot to mention that. And it is running 4.8 with > just about nothing on it, and it is networked with my office broadband > connection. > > So, is there a simple way I could install over the net? And how high a > release could I go? Obviously I won't be putting X windows on there but > if I > can get Apache w/ mod_perl, Samba, Mysql and Perl it'll be a useful machine > for my intranet. I had all that on before but apparently 4.8 isn't going to > work for me now unless I have a time machine. That's plenty of RAM for basic installation and modest non-GUI usage. I've no idea how much RAM Samba and MySQL might need to thrive though. If you ran them before, you should be able to keep doing that. According to the fine manual, you should be able to boot from a floppy and install 6.0 over FTP. It's just like installing from CD, only slower, generally . See section 2.2.7 of: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html I'd try re-toasting the 6.0 ISO myself. Use the slowest burn speed available on your burner -- older CD-ROMs sometimes have a problem with discs burned at a high speed. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 19:29:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF1816A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beat.siegenthaler@beatsnet.com) Received: from atom.beatsnet.com (zux165-132.adsl.green.ch [80.254.165.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B6743D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:29:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beat.siegenthaler@beatsnet.com) Received: from [172.20.0.53] ([172.20.0.53]) (authenticated bits=0) by atom.beatsnet.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k48JSvi7053020 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 May 2006 21:28:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from beat.siegenthaler@beatsnet.com) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=ATOM; d=beatsnet.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-greylist:x-spam-status:x-spam-checker-version: x-virus-scanned:x-virus-status; b=eRqlI6Q4MkIoTL/Qt/TI0+Ju4dy4aXr8p4b4QmKF+hzgxaiDjCCSGWwQKpvnPGtrH sdgsqkE4noQtlL+OXhkcw== Message-ID: <445F9BF7.4090105@beatsnet.com> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:28:55 +0200 From: "Beat.Siegenthaler" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave References: <025b01c67213$fec66dc0$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <025b01c67213$fec66dc0$0200a8c0@satellite> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (atom.beatsnet.com [172.20.0.45]); Mon, 08 May 2006 21:28:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on ATOM X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.2/1450/Mon May 8 18:38:31 2006 on atom X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: php4 port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 19:29:14 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 cacti and roundcube is broken. Has something to do with php-session. portupgrade -Rf php4 didn't solve the problem. still searching.. Dave wrote: > Hello, > Is there any known issues or things to watch out for when doing the > latest php4 upgrade? The notes in the UPDATING file indicated a change > in the status of the .cli binary. If one has mod_php4 and the > php4-extensions already installed is the upgrade a smooth one? > Thanks. > Dave. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEX5v3gMy0K9A7xM8RAlEiAJ4sQlMqC5b2X8oqTlvVSBzCMrZxtwCfQN7U 6Vps2JiQ7eIwA3wNDdvyxgs= =qz3e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 19:47:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C9B16A414 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:47:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx.go2.pl [193.17.41.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DA143D6E for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:47:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from [84.40.169.29] (xdsl-5405.zgora.dialog.net.pl [84.40.169.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD70E137A25 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:47:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <445FA039.9010900@o2.pl> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:47:05 +0200 From: cblasius User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Enable plugin nppdf.so in firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 19:47:10 -0000 Hello! I've a problem with plugin to view PDF file in firefox. Could someone help me? Wehen I run firefox from command line I obtain this message: LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined symbol "XtCalloc"] Best regards, cblasius From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 21:01:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6883616A418 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4111543D7C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:01:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so924561wxc for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 14:01:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dK3muneo5AdWAVTa1ZD6txRysGJtCy/JXZcUJ9JIoGvFAXgv6DgO3D1w+FUmLKTVrAspksoYIG3AsRu1gdgtonu/YejOz+J22JrcVQLPdmhFSmdmUUeFvVd6y8tP1eBilCsT8hLymGPcsMr3Ekwf8/xboxpXEzY71OMhf9YNM8c= Received: by 10.70.63.7 with SMTP id l7mr2906642wxa; Mon, 08 May 2006 14:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.115.11 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70063950605081401s3dce637ft695fec819b148877@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:01:36 -0400 From: "Marty Landman" To: "Greg Barniskis" In-Reply-To: <445F90F8.4070509@scls.lib.wi.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> <445F7F5D.5040106@scls.lib.wi.us> <70063950605081111h1670934fy177bbf2b7e3074a5@mail.gmail.com> <445F90F8.4070509@scls.lib.wi.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:01:53 -0000 On 5/8/06, Greg Barniskis wrote: > > > > > If you have enough RAM, go ahead and install 5.4 or 6.0 (or soon enough= , > > 6.1 > >> ). > > > > This box has 82M of ram, forgot to mention that. According to the fine manual, you should be able to boot from a > floppy and install 6.0 over FTP. This is giving me problems for some reason. I've put the floppy images on a Debian box in my office and dd'd onto a floppy. The boot.flp worked but the= n with the kern1.flp - which I dd'd onto the same floppy as boot.flp had gone on, get this after a while: zf_read: fill error readin failed elf32_loadimage: read failed Unable to load a kernel! ............................... maybe I'll follow the other path and just install my needed software the ol= d fashioned way. -- Web Installed Formmail - http://face2interface.com/formINSTal/ Webmaster's BBS - http://bbs.face2interface.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 21:19:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED4616A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hyperconx.com) Received: from front.hyperconx.net (ns1.hyperconx.net [65.74.165.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911D043D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:19:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@hyperconx.com) Received: from adsl-69-225-224-190.dsl.skt2ca.pacbell.net ([69.225.224.190] helo=Production) by front.hyperconx.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.53) id 1FdD8c-000PhR-0F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 14:19:30 -0700 From: "Wil Hatfield" To: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:19:24 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Subject: Requiring Manual FSCK -y X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:19:30 -0000 It seems that my FBSD 6.1 machines are requiring a shell and manual fsck -y after a kernel panic and dump. Is there any way to automate this so that I don't have to get the guys at the datacenter to do it for me? -- Wil Hatfield From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 21:23:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FBD16A407 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:23:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B045243D5A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:23:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k48LNOQN073853; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:23:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:21:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605081721.47544.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Requiring Manual FSCK -y X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:23:28 -0000 On Monday 08 May 2006 17:19, Wil Hatfield wrote: > It seems that my FBSD 6.1 machines are requiring a shell and manual fsck -y > after a kernel panic and dump. Is there any way to automate this so that I > don't have to get the guys at the datacenter to do it for me? %grep fsck /etc/defaults/rc.conf fsck_y_enable="NO" # Set to YES to do fsck -y if the initial preen fails. background_fsck="YES" # Attempt to run fsck in the background where possible. background_fsck_delay="60" # Time to wait (seconds) before starting the fsck. The first one is the one you want. See also the rc.conf(5) manpage. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 21:28:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BDA16A40B for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hyperconx.com) Received: from front.hyperconx.net (ns1.hyperconx.net [65.74.165.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F24D43D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:28:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@hyperconx.com) Received: from adsl-69-225-224-190.dsl.skt2ca.pacbell.net ([69.225.224.190] helo=Production) by front.hyperconx.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.53) id 1FdDHO-000Pjy-Aq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 14:28:34 -0700 From: "Wil Hatfield" To: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:28:28 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: <200605081721.47544.lists@jnielsen.net> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Requiring Manual FSCK -y X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:28:35 -0000 > background_fsck="YES" Perfect.... thank you. -- Wil Hatfield From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 21:53:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30C116A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario@schmut.com) Received: from mail.schmut.com (mail.schmut.com [66.92.49.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7869443D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:53:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario@schmut.com) Received: (qmail 76815 invoked by uid 89); 8 May 2006 21:52:48 -0000 Received: from schmut.com (localhost.my.domain [127.0.0.1]) by snoopy.schmut.com (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 May 2006 14:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.223.4 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mario@schmut.com) by mail.schmut.com with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49863.192.168.223.4.1147125162.squirrel@mail.schmut.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:52:42 -0700 (PDT) To: In-Reply-To: References: <47435.192.168.223.4.1147058564.squirrel@mail.schmut.com> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.9) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: mario X-Primary-Address: mario@schmut.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mario List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:53:09 -0000 So, Pablo Mora wrote: > config: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC:72: syntax error ?? line 72.. > check it. Pablo, thanks for your reply. It turns out i was running cvsup on my 6-release with *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 This crept in from my old 4.11 setup. Good thing it stopped right there. mario;> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 22:38:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE28E16A404 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3747843D4C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:38:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k48McebA029590; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:38:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <445FC86A.8000201@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:38:34 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060426 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marty Landman References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> <445F7F5D.5040106@scls.lib.wi.us> <70063950605081111h1670934fy177bbf2b7e3074a5@mail.gmail.com> <445F90F8.4070509@scls.lib.wi.us> <70063950605081401s3dce637ft695fec819b148877@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70063950605081401s3dce637ft695fec819b148877@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Greg Barniskis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 22:38:44 -0000 Marty Landman wrote: > This is giving me problems for some reason. I've put the floppy images on a > Debian box in my office and dd'd onto a floppy. The boot.flp worked but > then with the kern1.flp - which I dd'd onto the same floppy as boot.flp had gone > on, get this after a while: > > zf_read: fill error > > readin failed > > elf32_loadimage: read failed > Unable to load a kernel! Yeah, hard to know. In our tests, failure rate for floppy diskettes, straight from a local "discount" retailer, is in the nominal 60% range..... You could keep trying... KDK -- Executive ability is prominent in your make-up. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 22:49:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A0F16A406 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43E1B43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from liam.billschoolcraft.com ([63.204.157.14]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:49:37 -0700 Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:49:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Schoolcraft X-X-Sender: bill@liam.billschoolcraft.com To: Kevin Kinsey In-Reply-To: <445FC86A.8000201@daleco.biz> Message-ID: References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> <445F7F5D.5040106@scls.lib.wi.us> <70063950605081111h1670934fy177bbf2b7e3074a5@mail.gmail.com> <445F90F8.4070509@scls.lib.wi.us> <70063950605081401s3dce637ft695fec819b148877@mail.gmail.com> <445FC86A.8000201@daleco.biz> System-ID: [en] (SuSE-9.3 64-bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Greg Barniskis , Marty Landman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bad floppy disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 22:49:40 -0000 At Mon, 8 May 2006 it looks like Kevin Kinsey composed: > Marty Landman wrote: > > > This is giving me problems for some reason. I've put the floppy images on > > a > > Debian box in my office and dd'd onto a floppy. The boot.flp worked but > > then with the kern1.flp - which I dd'd onto the same floppy as boot.flp > > had gone > > on, get this after a while: > > > > zf_read: fill error > > > > readin failed > > > > elf32_loadimage: read failed > > Unable to load a kernel! > > > Yeah, hard to know. In our tests, failure rate for floppy > diskettes, straight from a local "discount" retailer, is > in the nominal 60% range..... > > You could keep trying... > Just last night I was just trying to get three good floppies from a brand new package of 10 to install on a Fujitsu Lifebook with only a floppy and could not believe the failure rate. Finally got 6.0 installed via NFS after the floppy experience. Which poses another issue for another email about having two ISO's available for an NFS install mounted on another system. They also seemed to be made of flimsier plastic for when I used to fold them in half in disgust it used to take more effort than it does now! -- Bill Schoolcraft | http://wiliweld.com "If your life was full of nothing but sunshine, you would just be a desert." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 23:22:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9F916A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from mail07.powweb.com (mail07.powweb.com [66.152.97.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C1743D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (24-119-225-24.cpe.cableone.net [24.119.225.24]) by mail07.powweb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04BA14DD99; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 18:23:08 -0500 From: "Z.C.B." To: "Atom Powers" Message-ID: <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dominique Goncalves Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 23:22:45 -0000 On Mon, 8 May 2006 08:27:33 -0700 "Atom Powers" wrote: > On 5/7/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:56:09 +0100 > > Dominique Goncalves wrote: > > > > > > > > Why FreeBSD tries to use ldap database if my user system is on > > > files ? Thanks for the help. > > > > Did you ever find a fix for this? I am running into the same thing > > myself. > > Check your pam.d configuration, particularly /etc/pam.d/login Probally a silly question, but how would that help with this problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 23:30:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE72116A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maguswizardo@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B22543D58 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:30:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maguswizardo@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1286612nzi for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:30:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iHIb0q5U0J5I2vipFMOOyqfSLIKMDgNWCe2dd3m9RpjgiBqgDVxkvfI+I8nnstITaTZyhA1Y2MKhgnRAnRsWwk1SPGZgAVrOLY7vEoPmcjMIfE44DzmTmXn8R9H2uiAKSisJYyIvlblI52k+rsR2i0poblVvNlfCWmBSJVfiz7Q= Received: by 10.36.38.8 with SMTP id l8mr4036131nzl; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.132.5 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <76ebe6440605081630g779cb751ubef4ea8137896e81@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:30:46 +1000 From: "Lennon Cook" To: "Stephanie Bridges" In-Reply-To: <010501c672c3$e2e7a960$0c20ba81@econ.iastate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <76ebe6440605051707m2f07cfaauaf17adaabeda9148@mail.gmail.com> <010501c672c3$e2e7a960$0c20ba81@econ.iastate.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with cordless mouse/Keyboard combo set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 23:30:48 -0000 Stephanie Bridges wrote: > Do you have a /dev/ums0 (my usb mouse device)? This exists only when my other mouse (the working one) is plugged in, and I have no other /dev/ums* . > Also, even when my mouse > didn't really work, disconnecting/reconnecting the receiver from the usb > port (moving to another or leaving in the same port) would generate log > messages that the mouse was being recognized correctly. Ok, when I reconnect it, it recognises as a keyboard and mouse set, and creates two files: /dev/ukbd0 and /dev/uhid0 . It tells me the following May 9 09:06:01 dragon kernel: ukbd0: G-Tech CHINA USB Wireless Mouse & KeyBoard V1.01, rev 2.00/0.20, addr 2, iclass 3/1 May 9 09:06:01 dragon kernel: kbd1 at ukbd0 May 9 09:06:01 dragon kernel: uhid0: G-Tech CHINA USB Wireless Mouse & KeyBoard V1.01, rev 2.00/0.20, addr 2, iclass 3/1 -- Lennon Victor Cook "He who receives an idea from me receives without lessening, as he who lights his candle at mine receives light without darkening" - Thomas Jefferson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 23:31:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E60316A40F for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A6943D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:31:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1322075nzf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:31:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HgOPJpOs3wYLKQFYAp5QZUFl86q7mXNzoi1sLI63t/gVpF47Cty7p2a78AfV5vEN1tAv1ELxPodJXhRM6Scmeg6a4iVV8grZPvtAs6L1oZ+PTd1XkmQMfYRQwaZ3VZSRSVKuBcbXE6yTXPRARML0patXKxUANcS68W2M23qJaWs= Received: by 10.65.252.6 with SMTP id e6mr1375204qbs; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:31:04 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: Z.C.B. In-Reply-To: <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dominique Goncalves Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 23:31:10 -0000 On 5/8/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > On Mon, 8 May 2006 08:27:33 -0700 > "Atom Powers" wrote: > > > On 5/7/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:56:09 +0100 > > > Dominique Goncalves wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Why FreeBSD tries to use ldap database if my user system is on > > > > files ? Thanks for the help. > > > > > > Did you ever find a fix for this? I am running into the same thing > > > myself. > > > > Check your pam.d configuration, particularly /etc/pam.d/login > > Probally a silly question, but how would that help with this problem? > pam controls how each application, including "login" attempts to authenticate. nss controls how user, host information is looked up. I don't know if it will help your problem, I'm struggling through my own pam/nss/ldap issues, but it is a part of the picture. -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 23:40:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780DE16A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:40:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from genoa.webtent.org (static-70-110-70-42.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [70.110.70.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350AF43D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:40:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from columbus.webtent.org (columbus.webtent.org [192.168.1.25]) by genoa.webtent.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092188A02A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:40:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 19:40:44 -0400 Message-Id: <1147131644.31831.29.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Auto mount/unmount USB hard drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 23:40:46 -0000 I have a USB hard drive mounting and working fine. I have the following entry in /etc/fstab that allows it to work on boot. The device loads as /dev/da4. But if I disconnect without unmounting the device, it detaches, but when plugged back in, it receives a new device as /dev/da5, which is not what is in fstab of course, yada, yada, yada. Is there a way I can get it to automatically mount/unmount the drive while working under the same device id as I unplug and plug back in? /dev/da4s1 /mnt/usb msdos rw,noauto 0 0 Also, if I try to reboot after unplugging the device, I get a page fault error. Not sure where this error is in the logs so I can post here in my message. -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 23:43:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FAA216A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:43:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D1C43D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so1054237wra for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.146.17 with SMTP id t17mr2889588wrd; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [216.45.217.148]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 7sm2116629wrh.2006.05.08.16.43.35; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 19:43:38 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <20060508133741.GB9605@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20060508152330.0973bd4c.albi@scii.nl> <20060508133741.GB9605@rebelion.Sisis.de> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060508194113.6CA9.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.25 [en] Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 23:43:38 -0000 guru wrote: > El día Monday, May 08, 2006 a las 03:23:30PM +0200, albi escribió: > > > On Mon, 8 May 2006 07:14:05 -0600 > > "Bryan Curl" wrote: > > > > > mutt sends mail as usual. Then, > > > fetchmail -S smtp.myispmailserver.net > > > > > > The mail bounces from myispmailserver.net with an error like > > > me@walnut.bc.net (my private domain) is urecognized domain. (exact > > > message escapes me at this time) > > > > > > The question is how do I tell mutt to send all mail out through ' > > > smtp.myispmailserver.net'? > > > Or maybe I need to configure sendmail or fetchmail differntly? > > > > sometimes i use mutt, this is the part in my .muttrc to get the > > from-address right : > > > > set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -falbi@scii.nl -oi -oem" > > Of course, you have to configure 'fetchmail' (normaly done > in a file ~/.fetchmailrc) for fetching and sendmail for > outgoing mail; in the M4-based rules files to generate the > sendmail's submit.cf you may use something like > > define(`SMART_HOST', `[smtp.myispmailserver.net]')dnl > > to put all outbound mail to your ISP. > > matthias > -- > Matthias Apitz > Manager Technical Support - OCLC PICA GmbH > Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany > t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 > e - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ http://guru.UnixLand.de/ OK, but suppose the SMTP server was GMail; i.e. smtp.gmail.com which uses SSL on port 465 I believe. Is it possible to configure Sendmail to use that in the `SMART_HOST' setting? -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 23:43:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D0F16A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from mail07.powweb.com (mail07.powweb.com [66.152.97.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C893743D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:43:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (24-119-225-24.cpe.cableone.net [24.119.225.24]) by mail07.powweb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1451214DFAE; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 18:44:12 -0500 From: "Z.C.B." To: "Atom Powers" Message-ID: <20060508184412.4ccbf90c@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dominique Goncalves Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 23:43:49 -0000 On Mon, 8 May 2006 16:31:04 -0700 "Atom Powers" wrote: > On 5/8/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > On Mon, 8 May 2006 08:27:33 -0700 > > "Atom Powers" wrote: > > > > > On 5/7/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:56:09 +0100 > > > > Dominique Goncalves wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why FreeBSD tries to use ldap database if my user system is > > > > > on files ? Thanks for the help. > > > > > > > > Did you ever find a fix for this? I am running into the same > > > > thing myself. > > > > > > Check your pam.d configuration, particularly /etc/pam.d/login > > > > Probally a silly question, but how would that help with this > > problem? > > > > pam controls how each application, including "login" attempts to > authenticate. nss controls how user, host information is looked up. > > I don't know if it will help your problem, I'm struggling through my > own pam/nss/ldap issues, but it is a part of the picture. I am curious. Do you run into problems with SSH and xterm, but everything else works? That is what I am currently hitting. initgroups(kitsune,1001): Invalid argument Is what it is kicking into /var/log/messages. That is right after I authenticate. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 00:01:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B99716A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: from postfix.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BF043D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:01:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix, from userid 20000) id 684D06844BD; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:01:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (postfix [127.0.0.3]) by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FD66844B7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:01:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postfix.bsdforen.de ([127.0.0.3]) by localhost (postfix.bsdforen.de [127.0.0.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 42347-06 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:01:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from loki (p549CEEFA.dip.t-dialin.net [84.156.238.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40D86844BC for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:01:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 02:00:53 +0200 From: Joerg Pernfuss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509020053.00b14888@loki> In-Reply-To: <1147131644.31831.29.camel@columbus.webtent.org> References: <1147131644.31831.29.camel@columbus.webtent.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_70SwkJbWtzrCsJXxsSTOFgQ; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdforen.de X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 445fdbc0449817559915059 X-DSPAM-User: global Subject: Re: Auto mount/unmount USB hard drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 00:01:06 -0000 --Sig_70SwkJbWtzrCsJXxsSTOFgQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 08 May 2006 19:40:44 -0400 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I have a USB hard drive mounting and working fine. I have the > following entry in /etc/fstab that allows it to work on boot. The > device loads as /dev/da4. But if I disconnect without unmounting the > device, it detaches, but when plugged back in, it receives a new > device as /dev/da5, which is not what is in fstab of course, yada, > yada, yada. Is there a way I can get it to automatically > mount/unmount the drive while working under the same device id as I > unplug and plug back in? >=20 > /dev/da4s1 /mnt/usb msdos rw,noauto 0 0 If the msdosfs has a label, you could load geom_label.ko and use sth like /dev/msdosfs/usbdisk /mnt/usb msdos rw,noauto 0 0 --=20 | /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a | | \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 | | X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. | | / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. | --Sig_70SwkJbWtzrCsJXxsSTOFgQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEX9u9H31s/bvKrSQRAtU9AJ9svZI7+GhXfGr6GKqLlYBuIoCbKQCbBGCr uHVhtXPtvYV2h3rIv8prq6w= =0zMT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_70SwkJbWtzrCsJXxsSTOFgQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 00:12:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09EC16A428 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:12:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F1143D6D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:11:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.internal (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C6DD5B158 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 20:11:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by frontend3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 May 2006 20:11:56 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 9vv8IZ2FX8WX6MSg+eUPjZetjS6YyaQlVEiNauozcRDz 1147133516 Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B9DD08 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 20:11:56 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 01:11:52 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> <445FC86A.8000201@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605090111.53551.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: bad floppy disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 00:12:08 -0000 On Monday 08 May 2006 23:49, Bill Schoolcraft wrote: > Just last night I was just trying to get three good floppies from a > brand new package of 10 to install on a Fujitsu Lifebook with only a > floppy and could not believe the failure rate. I wonder if it might have more to do with the fact that these days the drives themselves just sit there seizing-up and gathering dust for months on end. A few months ago I bought a new floppy-drive just to flash a bios, the old drive had become really unreliable even though it had scarcely been used. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 00:17:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A93716A413 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D327B43D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:17:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1328584nzf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:17:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fvswl4L61L7vn9O13iSONH1t7YeclI+eUz4RSyvOPgrGIXZ6NA3WPEDfetap11DZp2r9UH1w0DkbyHPFDTMRz/yEt6+HuMSAxp1zyW/oFglWtooppEtt+zK+vzZwSNrK744fXNmbfti6/3C/74H3aQ7x+1Miefz9fr1Vo4JjoAI= Received: by 10.65.147.11 with SMTP id z11mr1389023qbn; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:17:30 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: Z.C.B. In-Reply-To: <20060508184412.4ccbf90c@vixen42.vulpes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508184412.4ccbf90c@vixen42.vulpes> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dominique Goncalves Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 00:17:31 -0000 On 5/8/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > > > I don't know if it will help your problem, I'm struggling through my > > own pam/nss/ldap issues, but it is a part of the picture. > > I am curious. Do you run into problems with SSH and xterm, but > everything else works? That is what I am currently hitting. > > initgroups(kitsune,1001): Invalid argument > > Is what it is kicking into /var/log/messages. That is right after I > authenticate. > No, my problem is with local login when the LDAP server is unavailable. It hangs for about two minutes before logging in. I think I've tracked this down to an nss timeout somewhere. -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 00:27:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945F316A405 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@coastcable.com) Received: from mx.dccnet.com (mx.dccnet.com [24.207.1.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D54E43D62 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:27:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@coastcable.com) Received: from [192.168.148.3] (unverified [24.207.90.218]) by mx.dccnet.com (DCCNet Email Cluster4) with ESMTP id 7286024 for multiple; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:27:29 -0700 Message-ID: <445FE1D3.9010107@coastcable.com> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:26:59 -0700 From: "Kevin G. Eliuk" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060504) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cblasius References: <445FA039.9010900@o2.pl> In-Reply-To: <445FA039.9010900@o2.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enable plugin nppdf.so in firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 00:27:34 -0000 cblasius wrote: > Hello! > > I've a problem with plugin to view PDF file in firefox. Could someone > help me? > > Wehen I run firefox from command line I obtain this message: > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so > [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: > Undefined symbol "XtCalloc"] Verify the symbolic link for /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so it should be -> /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 01:05:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E02716A4DD for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579E943D5C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:05:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-120.storm.ca [216.106.109.120]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k491588i028768 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:05:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id 04C5323DE3; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:05:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 21:05:02 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509010502.GF25964@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NGIwU0kFl1Z1A3An" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: setting up pppoe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 01:05:16 -0000 --NGIwU0kFl1Z1A3An Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable People, I found this section in the handbook http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html and it mentions a ppp.conf file like so default: set log Phase tun command # you can add more detailed logging if you wish set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 name_of_service_provider: set device PPPoE:xl1 # replace xl1 with your Ethernet device set authname YOURLOGINNAME set authkey YOURPASSWORD set dial set login add default HISADDR I'm confused. Why would I set an ifaddr when it's a PPPoE connection? I don= 't know what IP I'm going to be assigned yet.=20 What is ifaddr for? This is also surprising [msoulier@kanga ~]$ man ppp.conf No manual entry for ppp.conf Seems to be in ppp(8) though.=20 I'm just looking to use a PPPoE connection with my ISP.=20 Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --NGIwU0kFl1Z1A3An Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEX+q+KGqCc1vIvggRAonTAJ0Xywenr9k2/tOaP+AA3Kl2vmGJ7ACglebI Psel6+XJT+9B75Vn9Rp65gs= =hxcs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NGIwU0kFl1Z1A3An-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 01:09:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3122A16A421 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A302243D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:09:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-120.storm.ca [216.106.109.120]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4919amH028950; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:09:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8BE8523DE3; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:09:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 21:09:31 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: albi Message-ID: <20060509010931.GG25964@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: albi , Bryan Curl , scrappy@hub.org, Matthias.Apitz@sisis.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060506203829.N36981@ganymede.hub.org> <20060507054134.GA1693@rebelion.Sisis.de> <51257d370605080614u76e7930bha35d96cae8cc0396@mail.gmail.com> <20060508152330.0973bd4c.albi@scii.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NPukt5Otb9an/u20" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060508152330.0973bd4c.albi@scii.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: scrappy@hub.org, Bryan Curl , Matthias.Apitz@sisis.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI mail client recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 01:09:45 -0000 --NPukt5Otb9an/u20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/05/06 albi said: > sometimes i use mutt, this is the part in my .muttrc to get the=20 > from-address right : >=20 > set sendmail=3D"/usr/sbin/sendmail -falbi@scii.nl -oi -oem" That's not really required.=20 set use_from set from=3D"Michael P. Soulier " set envelope_from Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --NPukt5Otb9an/u20 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEX+vKKGqCc1vIvggRAntEAKCweHflqs8m+xU5B4EU2RSIiLwdCgCgtUJm pDx0hwfZJmhRZCPI9udHAfI= =q/0d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NPukt5Otb9an/u20-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 01:27:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7854316A440 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sub02@freeode.co.uk) Received: from mail.freeode.co.uk (213-162-123-162.johnmu221.adsl.metronet.co.uk [213.162.123.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A0C43D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:27:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sub02@freeode.co.uk) Received: from lexx.freeode.co.uk (lexx.freeode.co.uk [10.10.10.2]) by mail.freeode.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k491RVRN004672; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:27:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from sub02@freeode.co.uk) From: John Murphy To: "Marty Landman" Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 02:27:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> <445F7F5D.5040106@scls.lib.wi.us> <70063950605081111h1670934fy177bbf2b7e3074a5@mail.gmail.com> <445F90F8.4070509@scls.lib.wi.us> <70063950605081401s3dce637ft695fec819b148877@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70063950605081401s3dce637ft695fec819b148877@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sub02@freeode.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 01:27:36 -0000 "Marty Landman" wrote: >This is giving me problems for some reason. I've put the floppy images on a >Debian box in my office and dd'd onto a floppy. The boot.flp worked but then >with the kern1.flp - which I dd'd onto the same floppy as boot.flp had gone >on, get this after a while: I seem to remember the boot.flp is required twice, so probably not a good idea to write over it. (Just incase you try the floppy way again) -- John. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 01:30:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B67416A43B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: from postfix.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC18343D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:30:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix, from userid 20000) id C1BF56844BA; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:30:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (postfix [127.0.0.3]) by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0CE6844B7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:30:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postfix.bsdforen.de ([127.0.0.3]) by localhost (postfix.bsdforen.de [127.0.0.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 53599-02 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:30:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from loki (p549CEEFA.dip.t-dialin.net [84.156.238.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4389E6844B6 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:30:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 03:30:02 +0200 From: Joerg Pernfuss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509033002.731b69cf@loki> In-Reply-To: <20060509010502.GF25964@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> References: <20060509010502.GF25964@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/NqvPT_+KkEjRP5Uk4+7+b8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdforen.de X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 445ff0a4634231065911191 X-DSPAM-User: global Subject: Re: setting up pppoe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 01:30:14 -0000 --Sig_/NqvPT_+KkEjRP5Uk4+7+b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 8 May 2006 21:05:02 -0400 "Michael P. Soulier" wrote: > People, >=20 > I found this section in the handbook >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html >=20 > and it mentions a ppp.conf file like so >=20 > default: > set log Phase tun command # you can add more detailed logging if > you wish set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 ppp needs some address to work with right from the beginning, before you get assigned an IP address from your isp. The original idea was, from my understanding, that you could specify your network, and would then only be assigned the host part of the address. Hence the /0, which specifies that nothing is network-part and you take whatever IP address you get assigned. Joerg --=20 | /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a | | \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 | | X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. | | / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. | --Sig_/NqvPT_+KkEjRP5Uk4+7+b8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEX/ChH31s/bvKrSQRAiyFAJ4jlblvA7LXJezuSYLOYl0egiraDQCfUCW9 L3z9kEhjEmjlziDI+u71vmI= =Rj4D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NqvPT_+KkEjRP5Uk4+7+b8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 01:47:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3D416A402 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from magalhj@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A24D43D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:47:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from magalhj@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 28148 invoked by uid 60001); 9 May 2006 01:45:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=S/5yz9l4t4OS6tUvxRz8ub9W+oUvrZGlr+ol8x386eDy/wFMyUupaHxLZqJZFpA1grna+e54PI9q/E8SKdkxzAbrCarupYIY8S80qi0PXsMqkgTM/pepY5W85ZYVw+vQk0/cvR2oKlTjcsfb3KIZyP8Lz8b8On6AFDvqGgWJU8A= ; Message-ID: <20060509014519.28146.qmail@web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.131.52.1] by web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 08 May 2006 22:45:19 ART Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 22:45:19 -0300 (ART) From: Aguiar Magalhaes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Unexpected inconsistency X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 01:47:21 -0000 Hi, I´ve received the message when the machine with freebsd 6.0 initializes: "the following file system had an unexpected inconsistency: ufs: /dev/da0s1g (/data) automatic file system check failed: help! init: /bin/sh on/etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single user mode" I'm trying to run fsck -y and reboot after, but it's showing the message again. What can i do ? Aguiar _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage. http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 02:12:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F9D16A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from msa1-mx.centurytel.net (msa1-mx.centurytel.net [209.142.136.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FFF43D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:12:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (69-179-6-50.dyn.centurytel.net [69.179.6.50]) by msa1-mx.centurytel.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k492CfoF013415 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:12:41 -0500 Message-ID: <445FFA99.40302@centurytel.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:12:41 -0500 From: "Michael D. Norwick" User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <445D5B26.2040605@centurytel.net> <445EC1C6.8060709@u.washington.edu> <445F249B.1080307@centurytel.net> <445F6A0C.7040101@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <445F6A0C.7040101@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Can't build bash3.1 during portupgrade -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 02:12:43 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > Michael D. Norwick wrote: > >> Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> >> >>> Michael D. Norwick wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> freebsd 6.1 RELEASE Compaq Proliant SMP PII-200 (smp modified kernel) >>>> >>>> ...snip >>>> /usr/ports/distfiles/bash from ftp4.us and re-ran portupgrade -a. It >>>> stopped again with the same error. What is happening here? >>>> >>>> => MD5 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. >>>> => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. >>>> ...snip >>>> And then; >>>> >>>> => Attempting to fetch from >>>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-3.1-patches//. >>>> fetch: bash31-010: local modification time does not match remote >>>> ...snip >>>> >>>> stop >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>> >>> Switch your ports cvsup server in your cvsup file, delete the patch >>> file, re-cvsup, then try portupgrade again. >>> -Garrett >>> >> >> Per the previous suggestion I built and installed portmanager, deleted >> the distfiles tree and started again. So far it is still moving along >> without error. >> Thank You for the help >> >> Michael > > Guess I was too late then. I noticed this error was consistently > occurring, so what I did was completed what I suggested above and > everything worked. The reason for having to do that was because a) the > CVSUP server I was sync'ing with for ports apparently was not in > service any more, and b) I downloaded the patch directly from the bash > site and that didn't seem to have worked, but instead brought up the > before mentioned error about the modification times being different. > -Garrett > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > No not at all. It is frustrating to see a new error and not know why it occured (then maybe have it happen again later). I've got some years on Linux but FreeBSD is foreign enough to challenge my knowledgebase. I thank you for your help. Michael Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 02:16:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1EB16A40A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A0043D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:16:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k492GKZv064233; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:16:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 21:16:20 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Atom Powers Message-ID: <20060509021620.GB65368@dan.emsphone.com> References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508184412.4ccbf90c@vixen42.vulpes> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: "Z.C.B." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dominique Goncalves Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 02:16:27 -0000 In the last episode (May 08), Atom Powers said: > On 5/8/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > >> I don't know if it will help your problem, I'm struggling through > >> my own pam/nss/ldap issues, but it is a part of the picture. > > > >I am curious. Do you run into problems with SSH and xterm, but > >everything else works? That is what I am currently hitting. > > > >initgroups(kitsune,1001): Invalid argument man initgroups: ERRORS The initgroups() function may fail and set errno for any of the errors specified for the library function setgroups(2). man setgroups: [EINVAL] The number specified in the ngroups argument is larger than the NGROUPS limit. Either get out of some groups, or raise NGROUPS (this may affect NFS though). > > Is what it is kicking into /var/log/messages. That is right after I > > authenticate. > > No, my problem is with local login when the LDAP server is > unavailable. It hangs for about two minutes before logging in. I > think I've tracked this down to an nss timeout somewhere. Newer version of nss_ldap have timeout veriables to adjust this, but your best solution would be to set up another ldap server and put them both in your ldap.conf so you'll never be without one. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 02:17:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1559316A41F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:17:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251DF43D5F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:17:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1348670nzf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 19:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B8aJYmWmKkCGXebt0N6vcoYnmNX6mAQ+qnk6eEY7sTHRo2naHhPXQqS2PUip+2cnImYMix94Hl79dU+crS3DNgVdp2QIKnw18/WQMwVzrsK2HyC8yvwRcfT8QDfS0aqh5y/Ac91eBoXppEQLxi0bqoX47IdS5nP09IbTN4cOMus= Received: by 10.65.203.12 with SMTP id f12mr1434677qbq; Mon, 08 May 2006 19:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:17:16 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: "Aguiar Magalhaes" In-Reply-To: <20060509014519.28146.qmail@web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060509014519.28146.qmail@web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unexpected inconsistency X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 02:17:20 -0000 `fsck -y` does not fix *all* inconsistancies, if I recall. you *do* have backups right? try booting into single user mode and running fsck without "-y". On 5/8/06, Aguiar Magalhaes wrote: > Hi, > > I=B4ve received the message when the machine with > freebsd 6.0 initializes: > > "the following file system had an unexpected > inconsistency: ufs: /dev/da0s1g (/data) > > automatic file system check failed: help! > init: /bin/sh on/etc/rc terminated abnormally, going > to single user mode" > > I'm trying to run fsck -y and reboot after, but it's > showing the message again. > > What can i do ? > > Aguiar > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > Yahoo! doce lar. Fa=E7a do Yahoo! sua homepage. > http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 02:23:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0E316A40D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0579443D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:23:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EED759624 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:23:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEE7F7E441 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:23:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FdHtC-0003jU-00 for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 22:23:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 22:23:54 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20060509022354.GA13993@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 22:14:24 up 21 days, 23:37, 5 users, load average: 0.07, 0.17, 0.35 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Install 6.1 on Sparc64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 02:23:56 -0000 I just decided to try my first non Intel install. I've got a brand new Sun Blad 1500. I downloaded the 2 6.1 RELEAS CD's, burned them just like I do X86 ones, halted teh machine, and typed "boot cdrom" at the ok prompt, only to be told (very quickly) that the disk was not bootable. Just to verify the hardware, I inserted the Solaris 10 CD and did a "boot cdrom" Bootedfine off of this. What am I doing wrong? -- U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong Terror - New York Times 9/3/1967 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 02:24:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E740916A443 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC64543D5D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:24:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1349835nzf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 19:24:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RqUNfIQRHk+0tXjx/m6VhbtOh7qD6ld3X5k199hC3FDvUfHBCO8Pdw7qtu0E4TrVOKk1tJ77jypPlZOB4+TiaV5KSOkNQZptUCDX5fq8KGtbFDzvQKjmvwLK5v3MN6MGcnk64kk+JK/r0RiGuA7K4xDXbE16zIQSyvZ1Sd1WEtE= Received: by 10.65.126.3 with SMTP id d3mr1439664qbn; Mon, 08 May 2006 19:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:24:20 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: "Dan Nelson" In-Reply-To: <20060509021620.GB65368@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508184412.4ccbf90c@vixen42.vulpes> <20060509021620.GB65368@dan.emsphone.com> Cc: "Z.C.B." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dominique Goncalves Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 02:24:28 -0000 On 5/8/06, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (May 08), Atom Powers said: > > > > No, my problem is with local login when the LDAP server is > > unavailable. It hangs for about two minutes before logging in. I > > think I've tracked this down to an nss timeout somewhere. > > Newer version of nss_ldap have timeout veriables to adjust this, but > your best solution would be to set up another ldap server and put them > both in your ldap.conf so you'll never be without one. > Trying to, but even just half an hour ago ldap server 2 of 3 died, first hdd in the mirror failed, second has inconsistancies... I hate job security. -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 02:50:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6DD16A403 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F0D43D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:50:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-109-120.storm.ca [216.106.109.120]) by mail.storm.ca (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k492obob003907 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:50:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0D72023DE3; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:50:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 22:50:31 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509025031.GH25964@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060509010502.GF25964@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20060509033002.731b69cf@loki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNpeiK4tTqhYOExY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060509033002.731b69cf@loki> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: setting up pppoe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 02:50:39 -0000 --PNpeiK4tTqhYOExY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/05/06 Joerg Pernfuss said: > ppp needs some address to work with right from the beginning, before > you get assigned an IP address from your isp. The original idea was, > from my understanding, that you could specify your network, and would > then only be assigned the host part of the address. >=20 > Hence the /0, which specifies that nothing is network-part and you > take whatever IP address you get assigned. Well, if it works, it'll be one of the simplest pppoe setups I've seen yet = on a *nix box. Looks pretty simple.=20 Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --PNpeiK4tTqhYOExY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEYAN3KGqCc1vIvggRAkyhAKCiejIFLcJvRegcXs16P6ne31RrrwCeNJBP PhSFE85WLU92W+cEvFklDN4= =Y0Fr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNpeiK4tTqhYOExY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 03:05:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD0716A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:05:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netsick@iinet.net.au) Received: from customer-domains.icp-qv1-irony3.iinet.net.au (customer-domains.icp-qv1-irony3.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE8743D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:05:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from netsick@iinet.net.au) Received: from per-qv1-webmail-01.iinet.net.au (HELO mail.iinet.net.au) ([203.59.3.55]) by customer-domains.icp-qv1-irony3.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 09 May 2006 11:05:34 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,103,1146412800"; d="scan'208"; a="774139182:sNHT1824227900" Received: (qmail 5896 invoked by uid 33); 9 May 2006 03:05:34 -0000 Received: from 203.59.1.180 ([203.59.1.180]) by mail.iinet.net.au (IMP) with HTTP for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:05:34 +0800 Message-ID: <1147143934.446006fe41262@mail.iinet.net.au> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:05:34 +0800 From: netsick@iinet.net.au To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 203.59.1.180 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd 6.1rc2 lacks i945 agp support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 03:05:39 -0000 I have a Dell Optiplex 520 using i945 (ICH7) chipset. I have device agp in my kernel but /dev/agpgart is not being setup. This then effects the opertion of Xorg 6.9.x by not allowing it to load DRI and thus no XVideo support. Could someone please help to sort this out. There have been several emails to various lists but absolutely no support given what so ever.. Who maintains agp_i810.c ? Could we please get some input on this. Several others have emailed to various lists also enquiring about this exact problem only also to be unanswered. Reference to supporting errors and pciconf output can be found here http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-March/117112.html Please get back to me and I can provide whatever files/output/conf's are needed to resolve this. Please help! Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 03:28:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905C116A466 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from mail07.powweb.com (mail07.powweb.com [66.152.97.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE1243DA0 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (24-119-225-24.cpe.cableone.net [24.119.225.24]) by mail07.powweb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DA814DA1F for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 20:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 22:27:47 -0500 From: "Z.C.B." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060508222747.71ce917c@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <20060509021620.GB65368@dan.emsphone.com> References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508184412.4ccbf90c@vixen42.vulpes> <20060509021620.GB65368@dan.emsphone.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 03:28:10 -0000 On Mon, 8 May 2006 21:16:20 -0500 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (May 08), Atom Powers said: > > On 5/8/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > >> I don't know if it will help your problem, I'm struggling > > >> through my own pam/nss/ldap issues, but it is a part of the > > >> picture. > > > > > >I am curious. Do you run into problems with SSH and xterm, but > > >everything else works? That is what I am currently hitting. > > > > > >initgroups(kitsune,1001): Invalid argument > > man initgroups: > > ERRORS > The initgroups() function may fail and set errno for any of > the errors specified for the library function setgroups(2). > > man setgroups: > > [EINVAL] The number specified in the ngroups argument is larger > than the NGROUPS limit. > > Either get out of some groups, or raise NGROUPS (this may affect NFS > though). Nope. I built my LDAP user and group entries from my NIS group entries. If I put it back to "files nis" from "files ldap" it works. > > > Is what it is kicking into /var/log/messages. That is right > > > after I authenticate. > > > > No, my problem is with local login when the LDAP server is > > unavailable. It hangs for about two minutes before logging in. I > > think I've tracked this down to an nss timeout somewhere. > > Newer version of nss_ldap have timeout veriables to adjust this, but > your best solution would be to set up another ldap server and put > them both in your ldap.conf so you'll never be without one. It still waits. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 05:26:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B204216A402 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cdtelting-ml@comcast.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.200.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3A843D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:26:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cdtelting-ml@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.60] (c-24-126-49-116.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.126.49.116]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <200605090521180120055g2le>; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:21:22 +0000 Message-ID: <446026D2.2000102@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 22:21:22 -0700 From: Chris Telting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Sendmail, Cyrus-IMAP, mbox, maildir, berkeley-db X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 05:26:50 -0000 I am confused as to a number of things so I'd appreciate being straighted out. I keep searching the web and looking at documentation but I'm getting more confused. Sendmail stores mail in mbox format. I'm not sure if it allows other storage formats such as maildir or berkeley-db. And if so how it's enabled. Cyrus-IMAP unless I'm mistaken by default looks for mail in the derkeley-db file format. I'm not sure if it also supports mbox and if so how to configure that. Chris Telting From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 06:02:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444E916A41A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 06:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDE243D64 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 06:02:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so1098637wra for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 23:02:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GdB3p/Mpb2pVzN88xH0GDJvNz6guPMsGBknRXJttitijjohyLdJrLFe8qwFh29AkgcCtArHEMEaqvSEccuk7Ug1yJ5Fw/ZLLzTo44lVAcQbREJ0i7D9qivTKWpTUANcP4g//oT4aw71kcRfBgtLOHv4Sf/pjq7YBIXj0kmGOF0E= Received: by 10.54.116.17 with SMTP id o17mr510639wrc; Mon, 08 May 2006 23:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.117.10 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:02:03 +0300 From: "Perttu Laine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060508174209.GB973@holestein.holy.cow> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <571463983.20060508130703@rulez.sk> <20060508174209.GB973@holestein.holy.cow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: 7-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 06:02:07 -0000 On 5/8/06, Parv wrote: > > /^(((\d+)(?:\.\d+[^.\-]*?)?)-(\w+)(-\S+)?) (\w+)$/ > Changing that regexp to pkgtools.rb made it work. thank you! -- kpn @ IRCnet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 07:17:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A142216A400 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C6D43D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:17:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k497H2EY030712; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:17:02 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:13:42 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060509010502.GF25964@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <20060509010502.GF25964@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091013.43079.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: "Michael P. Soulier" Subject: Re: setting up pppoe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 07:17:11 -0000 On Tuesday 09 May 2006 04:05, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > This is also surprising > > [msoulier@kanga ~]$ man ppp.conf > No manual entry for ppp.conf > > Seems to be in ppp(8) though. > and here /usr/share/examples/ppp > I'm just looking to use a PPPoE connection with my ISP. this or mpd from ports/net/mpd > > Thanks, > Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 07:51:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C54216A40A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587C643D55 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:51:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 27763 invoked by uid 510); 9 May 2006 08:59:17 +0100 Received: from 192.168.0.104 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1261. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(192.168.0.104):SA:0(-4.5/5.0):. Processed in 20.763539 secs); 09 May 2006 07:59:17 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(192.168.0.104):SA:0(-4.5/5.0):. Processed in 20.763539 secs Process 27756) Received: from unknown (HELO ubuntu.bathnetworks.local.bathnetworks.local) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@192.168.0.104) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 9 May 2006 08:58:56 +0100 From: robert To: "Z.C.B." In-Reply-To: <20060508184412.4ccbf90c@vixen42.vulpes> References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508184412.4ccbf90c@vixen42.vulpes> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 08:50:45 +0100 Message-Id: <1147161045.9552.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Atom Powers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dominique Goncalves Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 07:51:35 -0000 On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 18:44 -0500, Z.C.B. wrote: > On Mon, 8 May 2006 16:31:04 -0700 > "Atom Powers" wrote: > > > On 5/8/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 May 2006 08:27:33 -0700 > > > "Atom Powers" wrote: > > > > > > > On 5/7/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:56:09 +0100 > > > > > Dominique Goncalves wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why FreeBSD tries to use ldap database if my user system is > > > > > > on files ? Thanks for the help. > > > > > > > > > > Did you ever find a fix for this? I am running into the same > > > > > thing myself. > > > > > > > > Check your pam.d configuration, particularly /etc/pam.d/login > > > > > > Probally a silly question, but how would that help with this > > > problem? > > > > > > > pam controls how each application, including "login" attempts to > > authenticate. nss controls how user, host information is looked up. > > > > I don't know if it will help your problem, I'm struggling through my > > own pam/nss/ldap issues, but it is a part of the picture. > > I am curious. Do you run into problems with SSH and xterm, but > everything else works? That is what I am currently hitting. > > initgroups(kitsune,1001): Invalid argument > > Is what it is kicking into /var/log/messages. That is right after I > authenticate. Not sure if this has a bearing on the problem. From the samba by example web pages whenrefering to ldap: Some Linux systems (Novell SUSE Linux in particular) add entries to the nsswitch.conf file that may cause operational problems with the configuration methods adopted in this book. It is advisable to comment out the entries passwd_compat and group_compat where they are found in this file. I too have this problem. Logins worked ok with earlier versions. I had a setup which worked fine (can't get at the machine at present) that had no nis line present on the initial install, but when I tried setting up another machine the nis line has appeared. From my notes nsswitch.conf looked like this with an earlier version of freebsd and worked ok: passwd: files ldap shadow: files ldap group: files ldap hosts: files dns networks: files shells: files Now without the compat: nis line logins fail. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 07:59:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F88416A420 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C827343D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k497xXEY031513; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:59:33 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:56:12 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091056.13317.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Marty Landman Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 07:59:40 -0000 On Monday 08 May 2006 19:44, Marty Landman wrote: > I've just reinstalled FBSD 4.8 from the mini-iso on an old box (PII-133 w/ > 3 GB on two hd's). The problem I'm running into is that my ports are > looking for old, outdated packages, I think. > > So going from > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.htmlt >ried to install cvsup to do a port upgrade: > You could use cvs, delete /usr/ports before the checkout and: cd /usr cvs -d FreeBSD.anoncvs.mirror checkout ports select a FreeBSD.anoncvs.mirror from here http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/anoncvs.html HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 08:10:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C5916A40B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6969143D4C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:10:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-227-241.51-151.net24.it [151.51.241.227]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k498DQEC035453 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:13:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k498A3R6026463; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:10:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <44604E5D.4000003@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:10:05 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Telting , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <446026D2.2000102@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <446026D2.2000102@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: Sendmail, Cyrus-IMAP, mbox, maildir, berkeley-db X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 08:10:38 -0000 Chris Telting wrote: > I am confused as to a number of things so I'd appreciate being > straighted out. I keep searching the web and looking at documentation > but I'm getting more confused. > > Sendmail stores mail in mbox format. I'm not sure if it allows other > storage formats such as maildir or berkeley-db. And if so how it's > enabled. It does through additional local mailers, such as Cyrus. > Cyrus-IMAP unless I'm mistaken by default looks for mail in the > derkeley-db file format. I'm not sure if it also supports mbox and if > so how to configure that. No, it does not support mbox. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 08:10:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D3616A486 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C776843D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:10:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k498AvEY031735; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:10:57 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:07:36 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <70063950605080944v4d0c673cm3611ca0d2966d777@mail.gmail.com> <200605091056.13317.nvass@teledomenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <200605091056.13317.nvass@teledomenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091107.37170.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Marty Landman Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 08:11:00 -0000 On Tuesday 09 May 2006 10:56, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On Monday 08 May 2006 19:44, Marty Landman wrote: > > I've just reinstalled FBSD 4.8 from the mini-iso on an old box (PII-133 > > w/ 3 GB on two hd's). The problem I'm running into is that my ports are > > looking for old, outdated packages, I think. > > > > So going from > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.htm > >lt ried to install cvsup to do a port upgrade: > > You could use cvs, delete /usr/ports before the checkout and: > cd /usr > cvs -d FreeBSD.anoncvs.mirror checkout ports > > select a FreeBSD.anoncvs.mirror from here > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/anoncvs.html I forgot to mention that it's about 880MB on disk > > HTH, Nikos > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 08:18:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E5516A402 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:18:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuku@www.kukulies.org) Received: from www.kukulies.org (www.kukulies.org [213.146.112.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C5A43D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:18:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kuku@www.kukulies.org) Received: from www.kukulies.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.kukulies.org (8.13.3/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k498IIhZ036198; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:18:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kuku@www.kukulies.org) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by www.kukulies.org (8.13.3/8.12.10/Submit) id k498IHjv036193; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:18:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kuku) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:18:17 +0200 From: "Christoph P. Kukulies" To: Victor Lundwall Message-ID: <20060509081817.GA32757@kukulies.org> References: <200605081557.k48FvOo4072890@www.kukulies.org> <445F804E.9040809@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445F804E.9040809@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: Christoph Kukulies , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: could not determine fs type - fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 08:18:25 -0000 On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:30:54PM +0200, Victor Lundwall wrote: > Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > I replaced a disk that had trouble with fsck in a 5.3 system and connected it > > to a 5.2.1 system for further examinaton. > > > > starting fsck /dev/ad3 gave me an error: could not determine file system type. > > > > Had there been some change in FS right between FreeBSD 5.2 and 5.3 such that > > either systems couldn't recognize each others FSs? > > Don't you haft to have a specific partition and slice? So it should be > something like fsck_ufs /dev/ad3s1a? Else way try > fsck_ufs /dev/ad3. I think I tried fsck -t UFS /dev/ad3 already (not sure though, will be in the office later in the afternoon and try then). I believe you can also do a newfs /dev/ad1 instead of newfs /dev/ad1s1 which may result in a different disk layout. I'm also not sure about that. -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_kukulies.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 09:20:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826D116A405 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3B443D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:20:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13178) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FdOOH-000GpQ-CE for questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 09:20:25 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C3B58110B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:20:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from http.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A230581108 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:20:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDC358C605 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:20:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44605ED5.8090805@scii.nl> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:20:21 +0200 From: albi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: details about EOL (of FreeBSD 5.4) ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:20:27 -0000 i'm running 5.4 on a few servers, and i wondered till when security-updates will be available http://www.freebsd.org/security/ says that the EOL is estimated may 31 2006, but does that also mean no more security-updates for 5.4 ? i have no problem with doing a reinstall with the brand new 6.1 (or is the upgrade-jump from 5.4 to 6.1 no problem at all ?) , but i just like to get an idea when that would be really needed :) -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 09:52:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEA516A420 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B22943D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:52:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1422269nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 02:52:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=EeWsy8fYS5f/9qFGWxoRL66uOwUt+qJBPh08pHIWr4DjZK+vJedEjBbFpLRkqdqXQGl0Atqc+zb5iH7yUInh0eERQ++I8gRBTf3o/aNtc8rhZFx+wUU6rA3mh7W/tAfnHrAF4+IJQAS8LX8tLjAjuxB8u9EJ9d04bo0im9XGbe0= Received: by 10.65.35.1 with SMTP id n1mr281425qbj; Tue, 09 May 2006 02:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.234.3 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:52:22 +0000 From: "Kep Woof" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:52:23 -0000 Hi, I guess this is the wrong list, but I just looked at freebsd.org and saw the new logo. I really think it looks terrible. Everyone that I've spoken to agrees. It looks like some kind of sextoy/spacehopper, and not becomming to the enterprise os we know and love. Maybe it was the best from the competition you had, but I don't think it's good enough. Is there somewhere this was discussed? The new logo already looks last year. Is there a plan to redesign it each year as design trends come and go? If you compare it to the debian, IBM, BMW, greenpeace, or google logos, the design relates in some way to the subject. I don't see that happening here. Sorry if this is too late, or an unpopular opinion, or in the wrong place, but I just wondered if anyone thinks the new logo is good, and how long it's expected to last. Interested to hear what people think, kep From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 09:53:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6F916A411 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jad@nominet.org.uk) Received: from mx3.nominet.org.uk (mx3.nominet.org.uk [213.248.199.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C2C43D80 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:53:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jad@nominet.org.uk) Received: from wds1.okna.nominet.org.uk (HELO notes1.nominet.org.uk) ([213.248.197.128]) by mx3.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 09 May 2006 10:53:00 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,105,1146438000"; d="scan'208"; a="3739987:sNHT27139176" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.5 November 30, 2005 Message-ID: From: jad@nominet.org.uk Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:52:55 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes1/Nominet(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 05/09/2006 10:52:54 AM, Serialize complete at 05/09/2006 10:52:54 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Subject: mac address in install.cfg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:53:12 -0000 Hi, I am doing network installs of FreeBSD 6.0 and I want to place the install files in a directory that depends on the mac address of the server being installed. In install.cfg I want to specify something like nfs=10.0.0.1:/var/net_install/files/$MAC_ADDRESS mediaSetNFS package=db42-4.2.52_4 packageAdd Where the target server substitutes $MAC_ADDRESS at install time. Can anyone think of a way of doing this? Thanks John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 10:15:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E9216A402 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5941143D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1426048nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 03:15:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=F/4eNoACvLptk6t2Z07JkXlkh5aPEnl6S7L7PmKREfGYLw5z9qmyc+MZxu7PlrGZ/S0BMiPAqqcM3NtzznPEgHt46EGelrS/oswfvcCYouHWH/ozYvU9kTqIpfNiaPX6PxTbicCB/3V8rzTDleSZb1CnpxLTM5Mh5j09FPxd7dg= Received: by 10.65.196.9 with SMTP id y9mr1598614qbp; Tue, 09 May 2006 03:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.250.20 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:45:37 +0530 From: Subhro To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Bluetooth not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:15:38 -0000 Hello Folks, Recently I bought a new bluetooth dongle, an ISSC Bluetooth Stack implementation. It works (apparently seems so) with Wind0ze. But when I plug it into my FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE box, I get this in the kernel logs: May 9 15:43:32 phoenix kernel: ubt0: vendor 0x1131 ISSCBTA, rev 1.10/3.73, addr 2 May 9 15:43:32 phoenix kernel: ubt0: vendor 0x1131 ISSCBTA, rev 1.10/3.73, addr 2 May 9 15:43:32 phoenix kernel: ubt0: Interface 0 endpoints: interrupt=3D0x81, bulk-in=3D0x82, bulk-out=3D0x2 May 9 15:43:32 phoenix kernel: ubt0: Interface 1 (alt.config 5) endpoints: isoc-in=3D0x83, isoc-out=3D0x3; wMaxPacketSize=3D49; nframes=3D6= , buffer size=3D294 May 9 15:43:37 phoenix kernel: ng_hci_process_command_timeout: ubt0hci - unable to complete HCI command OGF=3D0x3, OCF=3D0x3. Timeout May 9 15:43:38 phoenix root: /etc/rc.d/bluetooth: ERROR: Unable to setup Bluetooth stack for device ubt0 What could be the problem? Any insights? Thanks and Best Regards Subhro -- Subhro Kar Security Engineer iViZ Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd. eRevMax House, 1st Floor Plot XI-16, Sector V Salt Lake City 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 10:37:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7716516A417 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:37:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E997943D6A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:37:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k49AbPx56344; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:37:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Kep Woof" , Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 03:37:25 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:37:31 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kep Woof >Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:52 AM >To: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org > > >Hi, > >I guess this is the wrong list, but I just looked at freebsd.org and >saw the new logo. I really think it looks terrible. Everyone that >I've spoken to agrees. It looks like some kind of sextoy/spacehopper, That's what it is, don't you know? >and not becomming to the enterprise os we know and love. But it's not there for YOU my boy. You see, Beastie was getting rather "constricted" with the disappearance of Beastieess. He tried screwing the Penguin last year but that was just a one night stand. So we gave him a sex toy so he could at least go get some relief. Only problem is he keeps popping it. It's some sharp tines on the pitch fork, you know. >Maybe it was >the best from the competition you had, but I don't think it's good >enough. Ask beastie, I think he's already smiling a bit wider. >Is there somewhere this was discussed? The new logo already >looks last year. Is there a plan to redesign it each year as design >trends come and go? If you compare it to the debian, IBM, BMW, >greenpeace, or google logos, the design relates in some way to the >subject. I don't see that happening here. > Well, it's kind of hard to have relations with a sex toy, but our Beastie is pretty constricted. >Sorry if this is too late, or an unpopular opinion, or in the wrong >place, but I just wondered if anyone thinks the new logo is good, and >how long it's expected to last. > I just think we need to get Beastie laid a bit more, then he won't need it. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 10:48:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F4B16A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:48:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from msa1-mx.centurytel.net (msa1-mx.centurytel.net [209.142.136.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4621543D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:48:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (69-179-11-117.dyn.centurytel.net [69.179.11.117]) by msa1-mx.centurytel.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k49AmfUx001425 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:48:42 -0500 Message-ID: <44607389.401@centurytel.net> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 05:48:41 -0500 From: "Michael D. Norwick" User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Heimdal/MIT and Sendmail/Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:48:43 -0000 Why does FreeBSD default to installing Heimdal Kerberos and Sendmail and how do I change the upgrade process to keep MIT/Postfix and not install Heimdal/Sendmail?? Thank You, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 10:53:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F1C16A403 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:53:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0AC43D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:53:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84191DDD5A; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:49:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:56:47 +0000 From: cpghost To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20060509105647.GA89879@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:53:54 -0000 On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:37:25AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >I guess this is the wrong list, but I just looked at freebsd.org and > >saw the new logo. I really think it looks terrible. Everyone that > >I've spoken to agrees. It looks like some kind of sextoy/spacehopper, > > That's what it is, don't you know? > > >Sorry if this is too late, or an unpopular opinion, or in the wrong > >place, but I just wondered if anyone thinks the new logo is good, and > >how long it's expected to last. > > > > I just think we need to get Beastie laid a bit more, then he won't > need it. Yup! :-) We've been putting stickers with Beastie (and Beastie alone!) on all our FreeBSD servers. No weird sex toys allowed in our data center... Poor Beastie! :) Semi-seriously, www@: how about offering people a chance to individually customize that logo away? It's not really THAT important, but setting up a transparent proxy just to filter that banner out is kind of silly waste of time. > Ted Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 10:54:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49DE16A404 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E254E43D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:54:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13158) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FdPrd-000LRj-6t; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:54:49 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEE958110B; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from http.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3241581108; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:54:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amandla.biko8b.scii.nl (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FCF58C605; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:54:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:54:42 +0200 From: albi To: "Michael D. Norwick" Message-Id: <20060509125442.3ce852f5.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <44607389.401@centurytel.net> References: <44607389.401@centurytel.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heimdal/MIT and Sendmail/Postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:54:50 -0000 On Tue, 09 May 2006 05:48:41 -0500 "Michael D. Norwick" wrote: > Why does FreeBSD default to installing Heimdal Kerberos and Sendmail > and how do I change the upgrade process to keep MIT/Postfix and not > install Heimdal/Sendmail?? in /etc/make.conf (see /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf) you can disable the build of sendmail (if you also disable the kerberos build, make sure you don't lose your ssh-session because of the kerberos-dependency) -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 10:56:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F9F16A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D9743D4C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from localhost (monrovll-cuda1-24-53-251-44.pittpa.adelphia.net [24.53.251.44]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 09 May 2006 06:56:08 -0400 id 00056412.44607549.00015CCA Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 06:56:07 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Kep Woof" Message-Id: <20060509065607.63e8f064.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> References: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:56:10 -0000 "Kep Woof" wrote: [snip] > Interested to hear what people think, Then take this to chat@freebsd.org. It's just flame bait here. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 10:57:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D0716A403 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp106.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E000343D5E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:57:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 4536 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 10:57:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type; b=E7OuAnwOT1GOW0Vzfg2kp0Gi0dtH/xxGLSSNXeqniSmu0GK65R/xOl4EMcm0AL+Q71W8Fyrl5KEtSGgAJZOtIluGFSXWfWu1e+FbMdwFnNhgH2eHtadRO0XYk/NMREa8+bAGEOfXYsL36OkaRJVPsegPnGYDsYxiiRnruDW3nCw= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.7.202?) (strbenjr@69.143.43.222 with plain) by smtp106.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 10:57:02 -0000 Message-ID: <4460757B.5030107@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 06:56:59 -0400 From: Ben Hacker Jr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051005) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Upgrade 5.4 - 6.0 errors. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:57:11 -0000 Hello, I appreciate greatly any help I can get on this... I am attempting to "upgrade in place" my FreeBSD server... hackserver$ uname -a FreeBSD hackserver.family.hom 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Sep 12 08:18:05 EDT 2005 strben@hackserver.family.hom:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HACK05 i386 hackserver$ Is there a way to clean out my /usr/src directory and start from scratch in case it is corrupted some how?? # $FreeBSD: src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile,v 1.28.2.1 2004/10/24 09:09:25 scottl Exp # # This file contains all of the "CVSup collections" that make up the # FreeBSD-stable source tree. # # Defaults that apply to all the collections # *default host=cvsup11.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_0 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. src-all After a seemingly successful: $ su root -c "make buildworld" =-=-=-=-= $ su root -c "make kernel KERNCONF=HACK06" . . . MAKE=/usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh HACK06 cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototype s -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr /src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipf ilter -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/fre ebsd -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -I/usr/src/sys/dev/twa -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS - include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large -function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror vers.c linking kernel.debug if_ural.o(.text+0x3bb): In function `ural_attach': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:458: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ieee2mhz' if_ural.o(.text+0x3ef):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:463: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ieee 2mhz' if_ural.o(.text+0x427):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:468: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ieee 2mhz' if_ural.o(.text+0x4bb):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:480: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ieee 2mhz' if_ural.o(.text+0x4e2):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:487: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ifat tach' if_ural.o(.text+0x513):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:493: undefined reference to `ieee80211_medi a_status' if_ural.o(.text+0x51e):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:493: undefined reference to `ieee80211_medi a_init' if_ural.o(.text+0x580):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:507: undefined reference to `ieee80211_anno unce' if_ural.o(.text+0x628): In function `ural_detach': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:535: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ifdetach' if_ural.o(.text+0x73a): In function `ural_free_tx_list': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:595: undefined reference to `ieee80211_free_node' if_ural.o(.text+0x8f6): In function `ural_media_change': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:673: undefined reference to `ieee80211_media_change' if_ural.o(.text+0x9ac): In function `ural_next_scan': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:699: undefined reference to `ieee80211_next_scan' if_ural.o(.text+0xb17): In function `ural_task': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:756: undefined reference to `ieee80211_beacon_alloc' if_ural.o(.text+0xc77): In function `ural_txeof': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:826: undefined reference to `ieee80211_free_node' if_ural.o(.text+0xd9d): In function `ural_rxeof': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:890: undefined reference to `ieee80211_find_rxnode' if_ural.o(.text+0xdb3):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:893: undefined reference to `ieee80211_inpu t' if_ural.o(.text+0xdbb):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:896: undefined reference to `ieee80211_free _node' if_ural.o(.text+0x1364): In function `ural_tx_data': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1218: undefined reference to `ieee80211_crypto_encap' if_ural.o(.text+0x185c): In function `ural_start': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1321: undefined reference to `ieee80211_find_txnode' if_ural.o(.text+0x1894):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1328: undefined reference to `ieee80211_en cap' if_ural.o(.text+0x18a3):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1330: undefined reference to `ieee80211_fr ee_node' if_ural.o(.text+0x18db):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1338: undefined reference to `ieee80211_fr ee_node' if_ural.o(.text+0x19c8): In function `ural_watchdog': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1370: undefined reference to `ieee80211_watchdog' if_ural.o(.text+0x1ad6): In function `ural_ioctl': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1417: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ioctl' if_ural.o(.text+0x1f5c): In function `ural_set_chan': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1606: undefined reference to `ieee80211_chan2ieee' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HACK06. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. =-=-=-=-= Manually attempting to build my kernel will yield the following: hackserver$ su root Password: hackserver# pwd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf hackserver# config HACK06 ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel! config version = 500013, version required = 600003 Make sure that /usr/src/usr.sbin/config is in sync with your /usr/src/sys and install a new config binary before trying this again. If running the new config fails check your config file against the GENERIC or LINT config files for changes in config syntax, or option/device naming conventions hackserver# Thanks! Please reply to my address. I am not subscribed to the list. Thanks! -- Ben Hacker, Jr. Network Security Analyst strbenjr {at} yahoo.com -- -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:01:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A70916A437 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B6043D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:01:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1433061nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 04:01:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=eNx0mjkzaBnQ4nqWxbrQpeVv93rlPjZ0hF0WLLipDUjT4zBQvIpC3T2h7hbZPNvF4rBqWjPRQ6lbMdN2l7/ceqM8OEObmyZFCLuV5NO28ljqZWHYhLm32FgOixvbIdGW+IpBbfG1v5A/55ZNZn7qDQ+ZLliKuhPp5fh/yJfCy6w= Received: by 10.65.203.12 with SMTP id f12mr1620899qbq; Tue, 09 May 2006 04:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.107.14 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 04:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0028260605090401g3f5cce33y8f52582f29cc0752@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:01:19 +0100 From: "Jeff Rollin" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <8a0028260605090359x581e64cbsbb0b8914458b789f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> <20060509105647.GA89879@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <8a0028260605090359x581e64cbsbb0b8914458b789f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Fwd: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:01:20 -0000 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jeff Rollin Date: 09-May-2006 11:59 Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org To: cpghost I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so is the font they've started to use since the announcement of FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. A= t the very least, consider this a plea to restore the font that was used before the latest change. Thanks. Jeff R. -- ------------------------------------------------------ Argument against Linux number 6,033: "...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:08:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AAD16A425 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452B843D77 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1434287nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 04:08:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nNOzLxmaO0ZwjiiccJ9cFdCmfXsimYxKhvcNPvC0gFr297q3K8mVcRvk8ldYYzN8w3ZMXNYf/cvAogN37iJSDEYAx/E7nfEID4vRt5SsD5D25jwP8IUH3icfgoL04YX4R/pZvsbrVbZ/yHgpSm1uuaUltgqTy3ShjiTGfsBEXjY= Received: by 10.65.147.11 with SMTP id z11mr1616755qbn; Tue, 09 May 2006 04:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.250.20 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 04:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:38:34 +0530 From: Subhro To: "Ben Hacker Jr" In-Reply-To: <4460757B.5030107@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4460757B.5030107@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade 5.4 - 6.0 errors. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:08:39 -0000 On 5/9/06, Ben Hacker Jr wrote: > Is there a way to clean out my /usr/src directory and start from scratch > in case it is corrupted some how?? rm -rf /usr/src/* > > $ su root -c "make kernel KERNCONF=3DHACK06" The correct command is make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DHACK06 and not make kernel You need to read the handbook :-) > > Manually attempting to build my kernel will yield the following: > > hackserver$ su root > Password: > hackserver# pwd > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf > > hackserver# config HACK06 > ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel! > config version =3D 500013, version required =3D 600003 This is a deprecated method. Not a good idea to try out. :-) Thanks and Best Regards Subhro -- Subhro Kar Security Engineer iViZ Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd. eRevMax House, 1st Floor Plot XI-16, Sector V Salt Lake City 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:16:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1FE16A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org) Received: from pd3mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80FC43D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:16:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org) Received: from pd5mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr5so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.181]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYZ00DEBWNC0910@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:16:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.151]) by pd5mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYZ00KTIWND4K60@pd5mr5so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:16:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: from soralx.cydem.org ([24.87.27.3]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYZ00FTPWNCEBM0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:16:24 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 04:16:24 -0700 From: soralx@cydem.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200605090416.24346.soralx@cydem.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Subject: linker wiredness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:16:26 -0000 [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# rm ./conftest [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# cc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lstroke /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstroke >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- why??? <<< [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# ldconfig -r|grep stroke 441:-lstroke.0 => /usr/local/lib/libstroke.so.0 442:-lgstroke.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstroke.so.0 [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# cc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -L/usr/local/lib -lstroke [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# ll ./conftest -rwxr-xr-x 1 root 1000 5594 May 9 04:06 ./conftest* Am I missing something here? P.S.: plz CC to me, as I'm not following -questions. Timestamp: 0x44607809 [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:22:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037ED16A434 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:22:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E03643D8C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:21:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBAC5EB6; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:21:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45gPVbF9X3fr; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:21:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-160-235-217.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.235.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714D35D4B; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:21:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44607B4C.8060801@mac.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 07:21:48 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: soralx@cydem.org References: <200605090416.24346.soralx@cydem.org> In-Reply-To: <200605090416.24346.soralx@cydem.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linker wiredness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:22:07 -0000 soralx@cydem.org wrote: > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# rm ./conftest > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# cc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lstroke > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstroke > >>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- why??? <<< >>>> > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# ldconfig -r|grep stroke > 441:-lstroke.0 => /usr/local/lib/libstroke.so.0 > 442:-lgstroke.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstroke.so.0 > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# cc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -L/usr/local/lib -lstroke > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# ll ./conftest > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root 1000 5594 May 9 04:06 ./conftest* > > Am I missing something here? FreeBSD's linker doesn't add /usr/local/lib to the search path by default, unlike some other operating systems. The "-L/usr/local/lib" flag is therefore required... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:23:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5E516A4C5 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:23:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (atx152.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.5.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96EA43D78 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:23:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k49BNDwY020511 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 May 2006 13:23:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <44607B99.9010409@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:23:05 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060424) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Schuele References: <445EA144.3020506@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <445EA144.3020506@computer.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig69BEB1B5010D4CC40F107556" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.2/1452/Tue May 9 11:14:00 2006 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: DRI and linux compat... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:23:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig69BEB1B5010D4CC40F107556 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/05/2006 03:39, Eric Schuele wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I'm trying to get a game running. The game in question is > NeverWinterNights though I don't think the problem is related to the > game specifically. The game does actually run. It is just that it is > so unbelievably slow. >=20 > It would appear as though I have no DRI within my linux-compat. DRI is= > working outside of linux-compat. I have been unable to find much on > the web regarding this. Basically this is as far as I've gotten: >=20 > [/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin] root# setenv LIBGL_DEBUG verbose > [/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin] root# ./glxinfo > libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 5.0.3 radeon (screen 0) > libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/radeon_dri.so > drmOpenByBusid: busid is pci:0000:01:00.0 > drmOpenDevice: minor is 0 > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is 4, (OK) > drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 4 > drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:01:00.0 > libGL error: > DDX DRI driver expected Radeon version 4.0.x but got version 5.0.3 > libGL error: InitDriver failed [...] > I'm guessing the my linux libGL does not like my radeon driver's > version? Any way to fool it? (Since I'd rather not downgrade my radeo= n > driver.) >=20 > I am running 6.1-Something as of yesterday. I have never had this game= > working. Just installed it today. So its not like it stopped working > at some point. [...] > Hardware is a Dell Inspiron 5100 2.6GHz. > drm0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem > 0xe8000000-0xefffffff,0xfcff0000-0xfcffffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci= 1 > info: [drm] AGP at 0xe0000000 128MB > info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.19.0 20050911 >=20 > Any help is appreciated. Hi Eric, I asked about that @emulation some time ago. DRI under linux compat is not working at the moment. Here's the original thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2006-April/001957.ht= ml Since then I updated linux_base to fc-3_3, X libs to linux-xorg-libs-6.8.2_1 but DRI is still not working (probably due to outdated linux-dri but I'm not an expert). HTH, Karol > Regards, > Eric --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enig69BEB1B5010D4CC40F107556 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEYHuhezeoPAwGIYsRAmQEAJ91nj+YcJ6jf33tvcKr/SM+u7eENQCfeAMk Hl2p6FyIG0sdadq2+quiMBw= =iG34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig69BEB1B5010D4CC40F107556-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:42:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F0416A406 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org) Received: from pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F267D43D5C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:41:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org) Received: from pd4mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr1so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.212]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYZ001XSXTXVW10@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:41:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.151]) by pd4mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYZ00L4UXTXQNF0@pd4mr1so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:41:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from soralx.cydem.org ([24.87.27.3]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYZ00EL6XTXHF00@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:41:57 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 04:41:57 -0700 From: soralx@cydem.org In-reply-to: <44607B4C.8060801@mac.com> To: cswiger@mac.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200605090441.57320.soralx@cydem.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200605090416.24346.soralx@cydem.org> <44607B4C.8060801@mac.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Subject: Re: linker wiredness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:42:06 -0000 > soralx@cydem.org wrote: > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# rm ./conftest > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# cc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lstroke > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstroke > > > >>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- why??? <<< > >>>> > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# ldconfig -r|grep stroke > > 441:-lstroke.0 => /usr/local/lib/libstroke.so.0 > > 442:-lgstroke.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstroke.so.0 > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# cc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -L/usr/local/lib -lstroke > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# ll ./conftest > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root 1000 5594 May 9 04:06 ./conftest* > > > > Am I missing something here? > > FreeBSD's linker doesn't add /usr/local/lib to the search path by > default, unlike some other operating systems. The "-L/usr/local/lib" > flag is therefore required... but ldconfig already found the library (line 441)!? Timestamp: 0x44607FB0 [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:53:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7EB16A406 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FCF43D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:53:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1395166nzi for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 04:53:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=EPozqgql+phxDPFntsKDFcnwvNVvfWa2cUoeBrL5DXRm2A3FZWy+vPuaMGtZXwRm1GRtIdHRGqioi+DNSFsrDhw+70fv6U81CtgSPXY1mzic2u5nI5SWi5yZDbg/VncBHG1Q1Pcm5H0IKYFGpeWJL7OkBX3IjmrjgogQtRxIvS4= Received: by 10.36.108.9 with SMTP id g9mr3261764nzc; Tue, 09 May 2006 04:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.18.34 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 04:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:53:04 +0200 From: "Michael Grant" Sender: michael.grant@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9ea43f1ba8a30b1c Subject: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:53:05 -0000 I host a bunch of websites on my box. Recently I had some problems with file access problems with php which caused me to look into putting each of my clients into their own jail or chroot. I have roughly 100 different domains I'd need to split. Has anyone done this for more than a handfull of clients? Using apache and their "mass virtual hosting", 100 domains is a breeze. But with a jail or chroot, I need a separate apache process for each domain. This is going to mean hundreds of apache processes. This seems unreasonable. When it comes time to upgrade, how does one upgrade 100 different jails? This will be a nightmare! What do you folks do who run lots of domains on freebsd? Michael Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:57:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C31C16A408 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED07F43D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FdQpk-0008PV-3Y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 13:56:56 +0200 Received: from sausages.cache.ed.ac.uk ([129.215.16.39]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 13:56:56 +0200 Received: from matt by sausages.cache.ed.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 13:56:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Matt Bostock Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 11 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 129.215.16.39 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060324 Ubuntu/dapper Firefox/1.5.0.1) Sender: news Subject: Logs not being saved (/var/log/messages, etc)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:57:06 -0000 Hi, The usual system logs such as /var/log/messages are not being saved. /var/log/messages does not exist, but /var/log/messages.0 (the old rotated version) does. I've tried a 'tail /dev/klog' and it returns 'device busy'. syslogd -dv isn't returning anything useful either. I'd be very grateful for any suggestions :) Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:58:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0176B16A403 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E148143D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:58:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1442491nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 04:58:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SGHn1xrL1o14wNdxrEl4YWrmwmXP2lRzpohW0+3eQzomZrDFQi4FneKNKahiRymrG1DQsDXFWFew7sY3EBnsE/Wsjr6KUkEzl69n7XMsgvwRh3pxO6smn1EoesJQ7NwkIj/OhQy817FjveVD/thV5/P67VjePtqrC9cFtbtNtuA= Received: by 10.65.252.6 with SMTP id e6mr1638744qbs; Tue, 09 May 2006 04:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.250.20 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 04:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:28:43 +0530 From: Subhro To: "Michael Grant" In-Reply-To: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:58:46 -0000 On 5/9/06, Michael Grant wrote: > I host a bunch of websites on my box. Recently I had some problems > with file access problems with php which caused me to look into > putting each of my clients into their own jail or chroot. I have > roughly 100 different domains I'd need to split. I won't be doing this even if someone pays me twice for doing it. This is going to create a HELL lot of problems later on, especially during upgrades. BTW can you tell us your exact requirements? Thanks and Best Regards Subhro -- Subhro Kar Security Engineer iViZ Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd. eRevMax House, 1st Floor Plot XI-16, Sector V Salt Lake City 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 12:07:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3178116A444 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from mgedv.at (mail.mgedv.at [195.3.87.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3783443D77 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:07:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from metis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mgedv.at (SMTPServer) with ESMTP id 99EBC186864; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:07:32 +0200 (MEST) From: "No@SPAM@mgEDV.net" To: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:07:46 +0200 Message-ID: <000901c67361$2f5af570$01010101@avalon.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcZzX7fWz78ftY0qTFuxlNRkAwmjWAAAMkhQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: 'Matt Bostock' Subject: RE: Logs not being saved (/var/log/messages, etc)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nospam@mgedv.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:07:51 -0000 > The usual system logs such as /var/log/messages are not being saved. > /var/log/messages does not exist, but /var/log/messages.0 > (the old rotated > version) does. if theres a rotated log, there should be a source for, too. check permissions on /var/log (eg. schg-flag) maybe there's some odd reason for syslogd not being able to write to it. also, try creating an empty file (touch /var/log/messages; chmod o-r /var/log/messages) and restarting syslogd. you can test logging with the logger-command. if your box is not private (for you only): did you check, if someone removed the file? check for logins, network sessions, strange users with uid 0 in master.passwd, change-date of files in at least /etc. if anything looks strange, change your root-pw, shutdown unnecessary daemons, and take the box off the net if it's possible ,-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 12:07:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D2A16A41A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974FC43D70 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:07:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so1576099ugf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:07:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=bxLWBNtf0oxWcxJTAFrGFu/pnT6KfH9RlGlZK6sCqLQZAEg/7pRlM2j+ooYl7Y1yABsu0T3rYy7+vh2xZUA79ipgNQOWRK6bU8surZ+wA4QaiYLtE/hVp8OOqxo/FC6xPuXi3F483U2GvduJeG6dCe05L9+T4wMzARIA7YW7dko= Received: by 10.78.56.19 with SMTP id e19mr754257hua; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:01:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:01:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605090501rd1cb877veae61c8fb2f75259@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:01:35 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Logs not being saved (/var/log/messages, etc)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:07:55 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matt Bostock wrote: > > Hi, > > The usual system logs such as /var/log/messages are not being saved. > /var/log/messages does not exist, but /var/log/messages.0 (the old rotate= d > version) does. > > I've tried a 'tail /dev/klog' and it returns 'device busy'. syslogd -dv > isn't > returning anything useful either. > > I'd be very grateful for any suggestions :) > Matt Make sure syslogd is started: ps auxw | grep syslog From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 12:19:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EB316A402 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBA043D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:19:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FdRBS-0003kL-OV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:19:23 +0200 Received: from beans.cache.ed.ac.uk ([129.215.16.12]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:19:22 +0200 Received: from matt by beans.cache.ed.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:19:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Matt Bostock Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 129.215.16.12 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060324 Ubuntu/dapper Firefox/1.5.0.1) Sender: news Subject: Re: Logs not being saved (/var/log/messages, etc)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:19:32 -0000 I think I fixed it guys, thanks for all of your help. Syslogd was choking because /var/log/messages didn't exist. I touched that, restarted and all was working again. I did the same for the others (auth.log etc), and things seem ok now. Many thanks, Matt :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 12:20:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B3C16A40E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from mgedv.at (mail.mgedv.at [195.3.87.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE96243D72 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:20:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from metis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mgedv.at (SMTPServer) with ESMTP id B853E186864 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:20:11 +0200 (MEST) From: "No@SPAM@mgEDV.net" To: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:20:25 +0200 Message-ID: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcZw/dbmAwA0p4rGSXSPVFU97AvcYwCZO6ag X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: kern.randompid: jot generation senseful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nospam@mgedv.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:20:31 -0000 [asked on -security before, but no answer, maybe here's more traffic ;-)] hi, is a random pid generation really a security enhancement? if yes, would it make sense to setup something like: --> sysctl kern.randompid=`jot -r 1 500 2000` in cron to be executed every X mins/hrs? and finally, what are the recommended minimum (security) and maximum (performance) values for kern.randompid? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 12:24:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84C916A444 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C7543D5F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:24:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael.grant@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1400974nzi for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:24:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=j0O5EjCbCrF7ErqCvUU3mm6ENoosys+U7FRwFMtiuWfsp6rJeFWWVajq164YcGnILfTTqIpMnKod406BLggABiYLVrZL64/E2ih7qYm11BpRDsrJdc1IoblugpGcEebkWgGzzVPZWpNvwYvO355IbEahATARxu/CKnQXf+Cn/l0= Received: by 10.36.247.32 with SMTP id u32mr5195522nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.18.34 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <62b856460605090524m11ed2afxda3ee0841f7db62f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:24:29 +0200 From: "Michael Grant" Sender: michael.grant@gmail.com To: Subhro In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 95160ffc4076abde Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:24:43 -0000 I'll try to be more explicit on my requirements. I'm not worried about mail. I'm mostly worried about web. Each client has a web site with one or more domains. I currently offer them apache+php+mysql+mod_perl+mod_ssl. One of them needs java server pages, tomcat I think. Everyone gets access to their own logs and to geolizer (webalizer). Some clients would like shell access. Most clients write their web site using ftp. Certain ones need also the MS Front Page Extensions. Some clients want an ftp upload area. Ssl poses a special problem in that I need to allocate an ip address for those who have their own ssl certificate. It's pretty much all standard stuff. But yes, I totally agree with you, it is an administration nightmare to set up separate jails and keep track of which has which version of what and so on. There must be an easier way to do this. Some of you folks who run hosting sites, how do you manage large numbers of clients? Michael Grant On 5/9/06, Subhro wrote: > On 5/9/06, Michael Grant wrote: > > I host a bunch of websites on my box. Recently I had some problems > > with file access problems with php which caused me to look into > > putting each of my clients into their own jail or chroot. I have > > roughly 100 different domains I'd need to split. > > I won't be doing this even if someone pays me twice for doing it. This > is going to create a HELL lot of problems later on, especially during > upgrades. > > BTW can you tell us your exact requirements? > > Thanks and Best Regards > Subhro > > -- > Subhro Kar > Security Engineer > iViZ Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd. > eRevMax House, 1st Floor > Plot XI-16, Sector V > Salt Lake City > 700091 > India > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 12:48:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5C016A421 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADABD43D68 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:48:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so1150428wra for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:48:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ctSlUjH5oql3UZJ0FcaamE2AwF5qagC89BU13BfHhzYiZmqfI2AGbfifK99rJgNfyVlWEIJlKkd6KD55EkM5X8o7vJqDzd6tFgxmpgE/y5T/IcM59mxgYkB+QpxJxvtLJJW0hvWzB2g8Rgd+ll1Pn+khMRxrhN/OUHda3tZ1k2k= Received: by 10.54.156.10 with SMTP id d10mr3586915wre; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.134.2 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 20:48:20 +0800 From: Jahilliya To: "Michael Grant" In-Reply-To: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:48:28 -0000 On 5/9/06, Michael Grant wrote: > > I host a bunch of websites on my box. Recently I had some problems > with file access problems with php which caused me to look into > putting each of my clients into their own jail or chroot. I have > roughly 100 different domains I'd need to split. > > Has anyone done this for more than a handfull of clients? Using > apache and their "mass virtual hosting", 100 domains is a breeze. But > with a jail or chroot, I need a separate apache process for each > domain. This is going to mean hundreds of apache processes. This > seems unreasonable. Agreed that creation hundreds of chroots or jails would be an administrativ= e nightmare. File access can be solved with suexec (compile apache with suexe= c enabled), this means that for each virtual host entry in your apache config you add User and Group (check http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/suexec.html = or your apache version doc set). This will make each apache process run as the user specified in virtual host entry (not www) allowing you to restrict their access to files with filesystem ACL's and even ugidfw, you could also then setup process/memory restrictions in /etc/login.conf It will also make updating pretty much as standard as it is now. Give it a burl if it sounds like what you need. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 13:01:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A373816A404 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwood@prohosting.com) Received: from mail-da-6.dns-solutions.net (mail-da-6.dns-solutions.net [69.12.124.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36A3E43D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:01:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nwood@prohosting.com) Received: (qmail 45867 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 13:01:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO NL.prohosting.com) (nwood@prohosting.com@166.70.238.202) by mail-da-6.dns-solutions.net - 166.70.238.202 with SMTP; 9 May 2006 13:01:53 -0000 Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.0.20060509065613.04317bf0@prohosting.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 07:01:23 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Nick Wood In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.0.20060505081022.0405e710@prohosting.com> References: <7.0.1.0.0.20060505081022.0405e710@prohosting.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: dwright@prohosting.com Subject: Re: panic: page fault - 6.0-RELEASE-p7 (now 6.1-RC2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:01:54 -0000 At 09:14 AM 5/5/2006, you wrote: >Hello, > >We have a group of web and mail servers that run under a moderate >load. We recently upgraded them from 4/5.x to 6.0. While we >thought we had done enough testing, apparently we hadn't and are now >experiencing panic's on a number of the servers. Some of our more >heavily loaded servers have been fine for days, while others will >crash every 6 to 36 hours. Below are some pieces of information >that may be helpful. > >Should I be posting this to another list as well? > >I know I can decrease NMBCLUSTERS dramatically, and give more memory >to the kernel if that would help. > >I've read a number of similar cases where this panic was related to >a hardware failure, and while I can't rule that out completely, it >does seem unusual that several servers are apparently having the >same problem. Could it be that hardware problems existed before the >upgrade, but are now brought out by the increased load caused by the >new OS version and other installed software? We have IPMI cards in >some of the crashing servers and they all report normal >temperatures, fan speeds, and voltages. Nothing unusual in the event logs. > >I'm willing to dig deeper and do more testing if anyone has suggestions. As suggested, we have upgraded to 6.1-RC2 and are experiencing the same or a very similar panic. Some things have changed on the system, so I'll re-post our config, backtrace and dmesg again. Also, in the past I have seen kgdb report the process that caused the panic, as well as some other information when first loaded, but sometimes it doesn't show that information - am I doing something wrong there? It has shown that information before, and it has always been tcpserver from the ucspi-tcp-0.88_2 port. Differences from the 6.1-RC2 GENERIC kernel config ----------------------------------- #cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU ident MAIL_6_1 options SUIDDIR options QUOTA options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=10 options NMBCLUSTERS=65536 options KVA_PAGES="640" options VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX=(512*1048576) options VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE=2 options ASR_COMPAT options SHMMAXPGS=131072 options SEMMNI=128 options SEMMNS=512 options SEMUME=100 options SEMMNU=256 ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- mail-da-5# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel.debug vmcore.8 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd". Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 165 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. in pcpu.h (kgdb) bt #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 #1 0x6064e239 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:402 #2 0x6064e4d0 in panic (fmt=0x60894857 "%s") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:558 #3 0x608496d4 in trap_fatal (frame=0x9c8f7ad8, eva=172) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:836 #4 0x6084943b in trap_pfault (frame=0x9c8f7ad8, usermode=0, eva=172) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:744 #5 0x60849079 in trap (frame= {tf_fs = 1619263496, tf_es = 1627652136, tf_ds = 40, tf_edi = 55, tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -1668318412, tf_isp = -1668318460, tf_ebx = -1668318064, tf_edx = 1738397568, tf_ecx = 0, tf_eax = 4, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 1617891744, tf_cs = 32, tf_eflags = 66182, tf_esp = 1835631104, tf_ss = 0}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:434 #6 0x6083890a in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139 #7 0x606f11a0 in ip_ctloutput (so=0x4, sopt=0x9c8f7c90) at atomic.h:146 #8 0x6070123b in tcp_ctloutput (so=0x66b34858, sopt=0x9c8f7c90) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:1038 #9 0x60687c04 in sosetopt (so=0x66b34858, sopt=0x9c8f7c90) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1560 #10 0x6068ce95 in kern_setsockopt (td=0x679dd780, s=0, level=4, name=4, val=0x679dd780, valseg=UIO_USERSPACE, valsize=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:1351 #11 0x6068cdc6 in setsockopt (td=0x679dd780, uap=0x4) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:1307 #12 0x608499eb in syscall (frame= {tf_fs = 1606352955, tf_es = 59, tf_ds = 1606352955, tf_edi = 1606413432, tf_esi = 3, tf_ebp = 1606413224, tf_isp = -1668317852, tf_ebx = 0, tf_edx = 2, tf_ecx = 134545464, tf_eax = 105, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 672065711, tf_cs = 51, tf_eflags = 514, tf_esp = 1606413180, tf_ss = 59}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:981 #13 0x6083895f in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:200 #14 0x00000033 in ?? () Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) (kgdb) q ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- mail-da-5# dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-RC2 #0: Fri May 5 07:27:28 MDT 2006 nwood@mail-da-5....:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LOCAL Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2399.33-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x4400> Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 2146959360 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2093965312 (1996 MB) MPTable: < Kings Canyon> ioapic0: Assuming intbase of 0 ioapic1: Assuming intbase of 24 ioapic2: Assuming intbase of 48 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 48-71 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 rr232x: RocketRAID 232x controller driver v1.02 (May 5 2006 07:26:59) cpu0 on motherboard pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 28.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 29.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib2 em0: port 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xf8200000-0xf821ffff irq 54 at device 3.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:28:78:fe em1: port 0x3040-0x307f mem 0xf8220000-0xf823ffff irq 55 at device 3.1 on pci2 em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:28:78:ff pci1: at device 30.0 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 31.0 on pci1 pci3: on pcib3 asr0: mem 0xf8300000-0xf83fffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff,0xfc000000-0xfdffffff irq 30 at device 3.0 on pci3 asr0: [GIANT-LOCKED] asr0: ADAPTEC 2015S FW Rev. 3B05, 2 channel, 256 CCBs, Protocol I2O uhci0: port 0x2000-0x201f irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x2020-0x203f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x2040-0x205f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pci4: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x2060-0x206f at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xc8fff,0xc9000-0xcefff,0xe0000-0xe3fff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A, console sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 unknown: can't assign resources (memory) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (memory) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2399330476 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to deny, logging limited to 10 packets/entry by default rr232x: no controller detected. acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 ses0 at asr0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 ses0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device ses0: SAF-TE Compliant Device da0 at asr0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-4 device da0: Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 34687MB (71041007 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4422C) da1 at asr0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 140014MB (286748672 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 17849C) Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a ----------------------------------- Any help will be greatly appreciated. Nick Wood From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 13:12:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191E616A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:12:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from genoa.webtent.org (static-70-110-70-42.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [70.110.70.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1A243D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:12:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from columbus.webtent.org (columbus.webtent.org [192.168.1.25]) by genoa.webtent.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F179C8A01F; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:12:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: Joerg Pernfuss In-Reply-To: <20060509020053.00b14888@loki> References: <1147131644.31831.29.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20060509020053.00b14888@loki> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:12:12 -0400 Message-Id: <1147180332.31831.46.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Auto mount/unmount USB hard drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:12:14 -0000 On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 02:00 +0200, Joerg Pernfuss wrote: > On Mon, 08 May 2006 19:40:44 -0400 > Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > I have a USB hard drive mounting and working fine. I have the > > following entry in /etc/fstab that allows it to work on boot. The > > device loads as /dev/da4. But if I disconnect without unmounting the > > device, it detaches, but when plugged back in, it receives a new > > device as /dev/da5, which is not what is in fstab of course, yada, > > yada, yada. Is there a way I can get it to automatically > > mount/unmount the drive while working under the same device id as I > > unplug and plug back in? > > > > /dev/da4s1 /mnt/usb msdos rw,noauto 0 0 > > If the msdosfs has a label, you could load geom_label.ko and use sth > like > > /dev/msdosfs/usbdisk /mnt/usb msdos rw,noauto 0 0 > Sorry for the direct message Joerg, I am resending this to the list. Thanks, but how do I label the msdosfs? I assume something similar to tunefs for UFS, but I don't see a label option for msdosfs. -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 13:19:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0F416A42C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B6443D5A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:18:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so1156264wra for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 06:18:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Apgsm7Nv7rKlKWXOQSrt6Q0ymkO17/bTPK8FewmHQl2APfNNN5DBwiz6JG5Z1xEVi3oLFooe467D+a/D+aT+Z4PNgfVuhWikpO/eIbdnq05njzurf36oRLRx0iKMbZ3y+T3vdWPFYDoh3dUykU2m3G/HaNZBDrqo/ycnQIP2kBs= Received: by 10.54.124.5 with SMTP id w5mr1536518wrc; Tue, 09 May 2006 06:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.134.2 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 06:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:18:53 +0800 From: Jahilliya To: nospam@mgedv.net In-Reply-To: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.randompid: jot generation senseful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:19:13 -0000 On 5/9/06, No@SPAM@mgEDV.net wrote: > > [asked on -security before, but no answer, maybe here's more traffic ;-)] > > hi, > > is a random pid generation really a security enhancement? > > if yes, would it make sense to setup something like: > --> sysctl kern.randompid=3D`jot -r 1 500 2000` > in cron to be executed every X mins/hrs? > > and finally, what are the recommended minimum (security) > and maximum (performance) values for kern.randompid? You can't change it once the system is running me thinks, so you'd run it a= t boot and that'd be that... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 13:25:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0569316A41A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666DD43D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:25:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k49DPpEY004408; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:25:51 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, nospam@mgedv.net Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:22:30 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> In-Reply-To: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091622.30492.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Subject: Re: kern.randompid: jot generation senseful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:25:54 -0000 On Tuesday 09 May 2006 15:20, No@SPAM@mgEDV.net wrote: > [asked on -security before, but no answer, maybe here's more traffic ;-)] > > hi, > > is a random pid generation really a security enhancement? > > if yes, would it make sense to setup something like: > --> sysctl kern.randompid=`jot -r 1 500 2000` > in cron to be executed every X mins/hrs? Isn't kern.randompid a boolean? TRUE or FALSE? > > and finally, what are the recommended minimum (security) > and maximum (performance) values for kern.randompid? It is just on or off. 1 means PIDs are random. 0 means PIDs are sequential. to be exact, everything not being 0, is TRUE. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:06:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2684616A504 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B730443D60 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:06:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 48633B83F; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:06:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:06:43 +0200 From: Frank Steinborn To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <20060509140643.48633B83F@shodan.nognu.de> Cc: Subject: Mirroring GNATS locally - /usr/ports/databases/gnats marked as forbidden X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:06:49 -0000 Hello, I want to mirror the FreeBSD-GNATS db at home, as shown in the Committers Guide. However, gnats in Ports is marked as forbidden. Can I safely use GNATS4 instead? Is it compatible to GNATS3 databases? Thanks! Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:09:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A6216A531 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: from postfix.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A8443D6B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:09:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from elessar@bsdforen.de) Received: by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix, from userid 20000) id 3FBA26844BA; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (postfix [127.0.0.3]) by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7CD6844B7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postfix.bsdforen.de ([127.0.0.3]) by localhost (postfix.bsdforen.de [127.0.0.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11290-07-3 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from loki (p549CDBAD.dip.t-dialin.net [84.156.219.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postfix.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB616844B6 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:09:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:08:59 +0200 From: Joerg Pernfuss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509160859.04f595ef@loki> In-Reply-To: <1147180332.31831.46.camel@columbus.webtent.org> References: <1147131644.31831.29.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <20060509020053.00b14888@loki> <1147180332.31831.46.camel@columbus.webtent.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_PlZSsCOuvlHyHxg7=kMiVF."; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsdforen.de X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 4460a288189683187918823 X-DSPAM-User: global Subject: Re: Auto mount/unmount USB hard drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:09:22 -0000 --Sig_PlZSsCOuvlHyHxg7=kMiVF. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 09 May 2006 09:12:12 -0400 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 02:00 +0200, Joerg Pernfuss wrote: > > If the msdosfs has a label, you could load geom_label.ko and use sth > > like > >=20 > > /dev/msdosfs/usbdisk /mnt/usb msdos > > rw,noauto 0 0 > >=20 >=20 > Sorry for the direct message Joerg, I am resending this to the list. np. > Thanks, but how do I label the msdosfs? I assume something similar to > tunefs for UFS, but I don't see a label option for msdosfs. In newfs_msdos(8) it is the -I volume id option. Maybe there is some tool available via ports that can change the volid of an already existing msdosfs, the FreeBSD base doesn't contain one as far as I know. J=F6rg --=20 | /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a | | \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 | | X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. | | / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. | --Sig_PlZSsCOuvlHyHxg7=kMiVF. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYKKDH31s/bvKrSQRArojAJ9NZ/vy4JymQYleTGJcWp0zdEddSgCfQ8pa 5Jdsq0jJojbD2y1FvioKcn4= =ncVz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_PlZSsCOuvlHyHxg7=kMiVF.-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:13:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3187016A45E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C53C43D5D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:13:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 88A0FB822; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:13:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:13:18 +0200 From: Frank Steinborn To: Nikos Vassiliadis Mail-Followup-To: Nikos Vassiliadis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, nospam@mgedv.net References: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> <200605091622.30492.nvass@teledomenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605091622.30492.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Message-Id: <20060509141318.88A0FB822@shodan.nognu.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, nospam@mgedv.net Subject: Re: kern.randompid: jot generation senseful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:13:29 -0000 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > Isn't kern.randompid a boolean? TRUE or FALSE? No. > It is just on or off. 1 means PIDs are random. > 0 means PIDs are sequential. to be exact, everything > not being 0, is TRUE. That is not true. Peter Pentchev once wrote: "The kern.randompid sysctl is not a boolean flag, but an estimate of the random value that will be added to each newly created pid. For more information, read the comments in src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c before the sysctl_kern_randompid() function (around line 150). The function itself ignores sysctl settings of less than 2." Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:19:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280C016A597 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39E943D60 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:19:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6865C1A3C1A; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 155BC51314; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:19:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:19:43 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: albi Message-ID: <20060509141943.GA88511@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <44605ED5.8090805@scii.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44605ED5.8090805@scii.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: details about EOL (of FreeBSD 5.4) ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:19:50 -0000 --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:20:21AM +0200, albi wrote: >=20 > i'm running 5.4 on a few servers, and i wondered till when > security-updates will be available >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/security/ says that the EOL is estimated may 31 > 2006, but does that also mean no more security-updates for 5.4 ? Yes. > i have no problem with doing a reinstall with the brand new 6.1 (or is > the upgrade-jump from 5.4 to 6.1 no problem at all ?) , but i just like > to get an idea when that would be really needed :) 5.4 to 6.x is pretty straightforward. The only thing to watch out for is to recompile all your ports (which you have to do when crossing any major revision boundary). portupgrade -fa or -faPP makes this pretty easy though. Kris --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYKT/Wry0BWjoQKURAn0oAKCzPwsQUpujYsAMSa6heP+2fsHx8ACgwOqe Gc2vgC4aXfRop5O0UBhqHTw= =485+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:32:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286CE16A404 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6A843D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:32:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (83.253.29.241) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.072.1) id 4460A18400002670 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:32:21 +0200 Received: (qmail 5722 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 16:32:20 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 9 May 2006 16:32:20 +0200 Received: (qmail 31259 invoked by uid 1001); 9 May 2006 16:32:20 +0200 Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:32:20 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: "No@SPAM@mgEDV.net" Message-ID: <20060509143220.GA31226@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: "No@SPAM@mgEDV.net" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.randompid: jot generation senseful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:32:23 -0000 On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 02:20:25PM +0200, No@SPAM@mgEDV.net wrote: > [asked on -security before, but no answer, maybe here's more traffic ;-)] > > hi, > > is a random pid generation really a security enhancement? Yes, but a fairly minor one. > > if yes, would it make sense to setup something like: > --> sysctl kern.randompid=`jot -r 1 500 2000` > in cron to be executed every X mins/hrs? No, that would not make any sense. What would you be expecting to achieve by that? > > and finally, what are the recommended minimum (security) > and maximum (performance) values for kern.randompid? -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:54:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A9716A407 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdutah@yahoo.com) Received: from web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 221AE43D5A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:54:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdutah@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 71701 invoked by uid 60001); 9 May 2006 14:54:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Q8IWSMTBJGBL4Eny9HZTyOZzghUxrGy6YXE09ApQGLyhcb8FOye2areINbKXF0FK+olqVHkJak3y1U9obrazhWE2475Q35C9vZhokIxp6zrAtm/kDxySBVTQTQ3n66kL23FFTxUAA2ddAcZ1f3q4fOD+0njc36b7bw/VGUNBWug= ; Message-ID: <20060509145403.71699.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [207.109.153.102] by web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 09 May 2006 07:54:03 PDT Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 07:54:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "M. Goodell" To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: System Intrustion Detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:54:05 -0000 More and more each day I am seeing my root emails contain hundreds of entries like this: May 8 02:23:35 warpstone sshd[26092]: Failed password for root from 222.185.245.208 port 50519 ssh2 May 8 16:37:41 warpstone ftpd[34713]: FTP LOGIN FAILED FROM 211.44.250.152, Administrator Basically, people are attemtpting to hack into my server often with a few thousands of attempts each day. What measures can I take to stop these attempts? Is there a way I can detect these attacks and automatically cut them off? Are any of the security ports effective against this? Thank you! M Goodell --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:57:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCD616A400 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEAD43D60 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:57:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from ibm64aec.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060509145750.OKC21521.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm64aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:57:50 -0400 Received: from wcox.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by ibm64aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060509145750.GMAY4253.ibm64aec.bellsouth.net@wcox.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:57:50 -0400 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20060509104913.02ea3dc8@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:57:54 -0400 To: From: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com In-Reply-To: <8a0028260605090401g3f5cce33y8f52582f29cc0752@mail.gmail.co m> References: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> <20060509105647.GA89879@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <8a0028260605090359x581e64cbsbb0b8914458b789f@mail.gmail.com> <8a0028260605090401g3f5cce33y8f52582f29cc0752@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Fwd: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:57:59 -0000 At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote: >I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so >is the font they've started to use since the announcement of >FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint. But if you're trying to "sell" FreeBSD to a boss or customer, a serious, business-like web site surely helps. The new one seems to borrow too much from the "hax0r" community's appearance. And the font overflows and looks like complete shit on my browser; usually this would just be blamed on using a "Non Microsoft Browser" (FireFox on windoze) but until we have IE for FBSD, it seems a legit complaint. -Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:05:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FC616A40D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079E143D75 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:05:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (AUTH: PLAIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 09 May 2006 11:05:24 -0400 id 00056421.4460AFB4.0001747D Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:04:44 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Frank Steinborn Message-Id: <20060509110444.95acb749.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060509141318.88A0FB822@shodan.nognu.de> References: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> <200605091622.30492.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <20060509141318.88A0FB822@shodan.nognu.de> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: nospam@mgedv.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, nvass@teledomenet.gr Subject: Re: kern.randompid: jot generation senseful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:05:32 -0000 On Tue, 9 May 2006 16:13:18 +0200 Frank Steinborn wrote: > Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > Isn't kern.randompid a boolean? TRUE or FALSE? > > No. > > > It is just on or off. 1 means PIDs are random. > > 0 means PIDs are sequential. to be exact, everything > > not being 0, is TRUE. > > That is not true. Peter Pentchev once wrote: > > "The kern.randompid sysctl is not a boolean flag, but an estimate of > the random value that will be added to each newly created pid. For > more information, read the comments in src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c before > the sysctl_kern_randompid() function (around line 150). The function > itself ignores sysctl settings of less than 2." Yes, but constantly changing the setting is unneeded. Simply set it to something large, like 10000, and a random number between 2 and 10000 will be added to the pid of each new child. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:06:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D5516A405 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB3B43D6E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:06:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FdTn4-0002uz-G5 by authid for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 16:06:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:06:22 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509150622.GC1517@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZJcv+A0YCCLh2VIg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Logs not being saved (/var/log/messages, etc)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:06:30 -0000 --ZJcv+A0YCCLh2VIg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:19:12PM +0000, Matt Bostock wrote: > I think I fixed it guys, thanks for all of your help. >=20 > Syslogd was choking because /var/log/messages didn't exist. I touched tha= t, > restarted and all was working again. I did the same for the others (auth.= log > etc), and things seem ok now. To stop it happening again, take a look at newsyslog.conf(5) and ensure all permissions are correct, and that newsyslog(8) will create a new log file or HUP the interested daemon as necessary. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --ZJcv+A0YCCLh2VIg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYK/uixf5fBYiFmoRAjo7AKCQT0l2pJmTCTyp/sAVnyfcu5/qrACgvWqI MdgTU8t40IEpfOlzBFiL+Tk= =APfN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZJcv+A0YCCLh2VIg-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:14:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBE416A416 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED98F43D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([70.39.69.56]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060509151448.YJZD9479.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:14:48 -0400 From: "fbsd" To: "M. Goodell" , "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:14:42 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060509145403.71699.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: System Intrustion Detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:14:54 -0000 check the list archives. this subject has been beat to death many times already -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of M. Goodell Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:54 AM To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: System Intrustion Detection More and more each day I am seeing my root emails contain hundreds of entries like this: May 8 02:23:35 warpstone sshd[26092]: Failed password for root from 222.185.245.208 port 50519 ssh2 May 8 16:37:41 warpstone ftpd[34713]: FTP LOGIN FAILED FROM 211.44.250.152, Administrator Basically, people are attemtpting to hack into my server often with a few thousands of attempts each day. What measures can I take to stop these attempts? Is there a way I can detect these attacks and automatically cut them off? Are any of the security ports effective against this? Thank you! M Goodell --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:16:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5851A16A459 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jad@nominet.org.uk) Received: from mx3.nominet.org.uk (mx3.nominet.org.uk [213.248.199.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136DA43D78 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:16:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jad@nominet.org.uk) Received: from wds1.okna.nominet.org.uk (HELO notes1.nominet.org.uk) ([213.248.197.128]) by mx3.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 09 May 2006 16:16:40 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,106,1146438000"; d="scan'208"; a="3742240:sNHT31897696" In-Reply-To: <20060509145403.71699.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> To: "M. Goodell" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.5 November 30, 2005 Message-ID: From: jad@nominet.org.uk Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:16:35 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes1/Nominet(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 05/09/2006 04:16:34 PM, Serialize complete at 05/09/2006 04:16:34 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: System Intrustion Detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:16:56 -0000 Hi, I would suggest using ssh with RSA key pairs and passphrases only. Dont allow password based login or root login over ssh. Only allow root to login using the console and use sudo for all admin tasks. I have not tried this myself but you could use tcpwrappers and write a script to add the IP address from repeated failed messages to the hosts.deny file. There are various scripts already written to do this. A quick goggle search found this http://security.linux.com/article.pl?sid=05/09/15/1655234 (its about linux but I am sure the same approach applies to FreeBSD.) Hope this helps John owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote on 09/05/2006 15:54:03: > More and more each day I am seeing my root emails contain hundreds > of entries like this: > > May 8 02:23:35 warpstone sshd[26092]: Failed password for root > from 222.185.245.208 port 50519 ssh2 > May 8 16:37:41 warpstone ftpd[34713]: FTP LOGIN FAILED FROM 211.44. > 250.152, Administrator > > Basically, people are attemtpting to hack into my server often > with a few thousands of attempts each day. What measures can I take > to stop these attempts? Is there a way I can detect these attacks > and automatically cut them off? Are any of the security ports > effective against this? > > Thank you! > > M Goodell > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:22:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCE916A462 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from mail.attiksystem.ch (f29.attiksystem.ch [212.147.59.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A2043D66 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:22:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from poweredge.attiksystem.ch (poweredge.attiksystem.ch [10.0.0.29]) by mail.attiksystem.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k49FMUAN045860; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:22:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:22:30 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004E_01C6738D.26F17860"; micalg=SHA1; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D0CAA@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: jails or chroot? Thread-Index: AcZzZvNLp4VxQ9XBTdyG6T4Xty3zvgAElN9w From: "Philippe Lang" To: "Jahilliya" , "Michael Grant" X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 10.0.0.111 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:22:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C6738D.26F17860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Sure, jails require more work regarding administration. Ports are not = the biggest problem I think, it's the easy part. The problem is when you = have to update the world. But even here, with a good script, it's not such a nightmare. Maybe all you need is Michael's solution. But take into account that = with jails, you have a great flexibility regarding the application you = install for a particular client. And all the security that a jail system can = offer, plus a fantastic way of managing your backups. I personally run a jail based VPS server, based on FreeBSD 6.0, with 13 jails at the moment. It's a dual xeon, with 4GB RAM, and RAID 5 SCSI = HDs. I have 355 MB RAM active, 1525 inactive and 1679 MB RAM are free. I intend = to run a maximum of 50 jails on this server. And until now, nothing seems = to oppose to my plans. Beware of one thing with jails, though: a bug in FreeBSD does not permit = a clean shutdown of jails. But tust me: you never need to! Hope this helps, and keep us informed of your choice. Philippe Lang -----Message d'origine----- De : owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] De la part de Jahilliya Envoy=E9 : mardi, 9. mai 2006 14:48 =C0 : Michael Grant Cc : freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Objet : Re: jails or chroot? On 5/9/06, Michael Grant wrote: > > I host a bunch of websites on my box. Recently I had some problems=20 > with file access problems with php which caused me to look into=20 > putting each of my clients into their own jail or chroot. I have=20 > roughly 100 different domains I'd need to split. > > Has anyone done this for more than a handfull of clients? Using=20 > apache and their "mass virtual hosting", 100 domains is a breeze. But = > with a jail or chroot, I need a separate apache process for each=20 > domain. This is going to mean hundreds of apache processes. This=20 > seems unreasonable. Agreed that creation hundreds of chroots or jails would be an = administrative nightmare. File access can be solved with suexec (compile apache with = suexec enabled), this means that for each virtual host entry in your apache = config you add User and Group (check = http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/suexec.html or your apache version doc set). This will make each apache process run = as the user specified in virtual host entry (not www) allowing you to = restrict their access to files with filesystem ACL's and even ugidfw, you could = also then setup process/memory restrictions in /etc/login.conf It will also make updating pretty much as standard as it is now. Give it a burl if it sounds like what you need. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C6738D.26F17860 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCCAocw ggHwoAMCAQICEH9zwUYvHtvw6IJCOxLOs/kwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MDQxMzEzNTE0MVoXDTA3MDQxMzEzNTE0 MVowZzENMAsGA1UEBBMETGFuZzERMA8GA1UEKhMIUGhpbGlwcGUxFjAUBgNVBAMTDVBoaWxpcHBl IExhbmcxKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMPPDiMakqY/55dqY6Y59M/0OBmPPnXodC2Da6SCydQ/noAJ sQttXSG0BR6zcA7WM+Kt9efIYwB5FnNcTEPIaTjbR0NLZq/XvEGQDTb7Owp0PDlghZsN+kK8KJAi OzCcN+fWNbnR9u6HayepO9Q84DU3a1sFqTebCuiJkR8DvJZ5AgMBAAGjOTA3MCcGA1UdEQQgMB6B HHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQF AAOBgQA2FzHGn2/pAED5DqKvHSz+ExQb6UbeAT0yxHc4jDINHY3sWGXO9C19RcBZ1Ol2KU3YlY69 XBAc3Phd5T3YU6CC3vMDTq5+QpXM1yysQtw4OGAfLbQISlKjA8WgdOQAk7BybRvkUbgV2+erDsaN fNaAbD+zEc9WS+VIQ7oZe5n8fzCCAy0wggKWoAMCAQICAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05NjAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0yMDEy MzEyMzU5NTlaMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQH EwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBANRp19SwlGRbcelH2AxRtupykbCEXn0tDY97Et+FJXUodDpC LGMnn5V7S+9+GYcdhuqj3bnOlmQawhRuRKx85o/oTQ9xH0A4pgCjh3j2+ZSGXq3qwF5269kUo11u enwMpUtVfwYZKX+emibVars4JAhqmMex2qOYkf152+VaxBy5AgMBAAGjEzARMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQF MAMBAf8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAx+ySfk749ZalZ2IqpPBNEWDQb41gWGGsJrtSNVwIzzD7 qEqWih9iQiOMFw/0umScF6xHKd+dmF7SbGBxXKKs3Hnj524ARx+1DSjoAp3kmv0T9KbZfLH43F8j JgmRgHPQFBveQ6mDJfLmnC8Vyv6mq4oHdYsM3VGEa+T40c53ooEwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYD VQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5o wHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH 5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8v Y3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYw KQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZ Ohl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NW IXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIC+DCCAvQCAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZy ZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEH9zwUYvHtvw6IJCOxLOs/kwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAdgwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwNTA5MTUyMjMwWjAjBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQQxFgQUEEgt5+FmnODlvyPJSHvLizsQOocwZwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMVowWDAKBggqhkiG9w0D BzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw BwYFKw4DAhowCgYIKoZIhvcNAgUwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhB/c8FGLx7b8OiCQjsSzrP5MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRAC CzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0 ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhB/c8FGLx7b 8OiCQjsSzrP5MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGAXYxmrDSl0Y5nepgIhqNVVaU+7opKxjwWv3c3gmAq RAjVd7S59bmWjoSnKFAPKeJpmCR/cxZAUfnv1a6sX23m0OT0uIroU1A5oRuM2XJ5hzXV7iyHvGX2 Auji4KquqMrNp4511K8hER2v68hxOxiB/mh9YQOJ/O2x0iPD3C9UHX8AAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C6738D.26F17860-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:24:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C91216A4A3 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D6143D62 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:23:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k49FNRkk014902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 May 2006 18:23:33 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k49FNiqk013609; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:23:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k49FNinP013608; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:23:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:23:44 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com Message-ID: <20060509152344.GA13560@gothmog.pc> References: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> <20060509105647.GA89879@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <8a0028260605090359x581e64cbsbb0b8914458b789f@mail.gmail.com> <8a0028260605090401g3f5cce33y8f52582f29cc0752@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20060509104913.02ea3dc8@mailsvr.xxiii.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20060509104913.02ea3dc8@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.392, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.81, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:24:00 -0000 On 2006-05-09 10:57, wc_fbsd@xxiii.com wrote: >At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote: >> I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, >> and so is the font they've started to use since the >> announcement of FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At > > Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint. > > But if you're trying to "sell" FreeBSD to a boss or customer, a > serious, business-like web site surely helps. The new one > seems to borrow too much from the "hax0r" community's > appearance. > > And the font overflows and looks like complete shit on my > browser; usually this would just be blamed on using a "Non > Microsoft Browser" (FireFox on windoze) but until we have IE > for FBSD, it seems a legit complaint. I'm not a fan of the new logo either, but having said that, the integration of the new logo with the website was done only this morning. Let's give it some time to settle in and have all the problems solved, shall we? - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:24:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB94A16A59A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2841443D73 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:24:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FdU4A-0003G8-Vm by authid for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 16:24:02 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:24:02 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20060509152402.GD1517@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20060509145403.71699.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IU5/I01NYhRvwH70" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060509145403.71699.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: System Intrustion Detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:24:12 -0000 --IU5/I01NYhRvwH70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:54:03AM -0700, M. Goodell wrote: > More and more each day I am seeing my root emails contain hundreds of ent= ries like this: > =20 > May 8 02:23:35 warpstone sshd[26092]: Failed password for root from 22= 2.185.245.208 port 50519 ssh2 > May 8 16:37:41 warpstone ftpd[34713]: FTP LOGIN FAILED FROM 211.44.250.1= 52, Administrator > =20 > Basically, people are attemtpting to hack into my server often with=20 > a few thousands of attempts each day. What measures can I take to stop=20 > these attempts? Is there a way I can detect these attacks and=20 > automatically cut them off? Are any of the security ports effective=20 > against this? Don't feel too bad - the little bastards try it on anywhere and everywhere. There are a few things you can do to stop them in their tracks. From what I gather, the pf firewall provides some neat table functionality that can be put to use in this situation. I have never used pf, so will not say more of it here. I use Denyhosts, which is intended to stop brute force ssh attacks, but which can be used to deny unwanted/unwelcome connections to any or all services. It's in the ports, is easy to set up and works really well. There is a synchronisation server from which it can download IP addresses that have been logged trying to mount attacks, and allows your DenyHosts to upload addresses that have tried to crack you. There are a couple of things you can do to protect your sshd. First, allow only public key authentication. This may not be practical in all situations, but it is a very good way of preventing dictionary attacks from succeeding! Secondly, set AllowGroups or AllowUsers in your sshd.config, so that only explicitly permitted users or groups can request a login. HTH Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --IU5/I01NYhRvwH70 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYLQSixf5fBYiFmoRAsyWAJ4gpRySpS8llh3KC/gxyXYRHFnVKQCg1mRM GKj/N2MHai0bUnCgenHU3uI= =9+lU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IU5/I01NYhRvwH70-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:24:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A414316A4D9 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbridges@iastate.edu) Received: from mailhub-4.iastate.edu (mailhub-4.iastate.edu [129.186.140.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3C043D5A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:24:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sbridges@iastate.edu) Received: from mailout-2.iastate.edu (mailout-2.iastate.edu [129.186.140.2]) by mailhub-4.iastate.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with SMTP id k49FOLJs002080; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:24:21 -0500 Received: from bridgespc.econ.iastate.edu(129.186.32.12) by mailout-2.iastate.edu via smtp id 0676_d39fcfe0_df70_11da_9068_003048290bef; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:31:03 -0500 From: "Stephanie Bridges" To: "'Lennon Cook'" Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:24:23 -0500 Message-ID: <005801c6737c$a67bfbc0$0c20ba81@econ.iastate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: <76ebe6440605081630g779cb751ubef4ea8137896e81@mail.gmail.com> Thread-Index: AcZy93tv9IhlO0PeSZOHs5/VoANztQAgp9sw Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Problem with cordless mouse/Keyboard combo set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:24:35 -0000 Lennon Cook wrote: > Stephanie Bridges wrote: >> Do you have a /dev/ums0 (my usb mouse device)? > This exists only when my other mouse (the working one) is plugged in, > and I have no other /dev/ums* . > >> Also, even when my mouse >> didn't really work, disconnecting/reconnecting the receiver from the >> usb port (moving to another or leaving in the same port) would >> generate log messages that the mouse was being recognized correctly. > Ok, when I reconnect it, it recognises as a keyboard and mouse set, > and creates two files: /dev/ukbd0 and /dev/uhid0 . It tells me the > following May 9 09:06:01 dragon kernel: ukbd0: G-Tech CHINA USB > Wireless Mouse & KeyBoard V1.01, rev 2.00/0.20, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > May 9 09:06:01 dragon kernel: kbd1 at ukbd0 > May 9 09:06:01 dragon kernel: uhid0: G-Tech CHINA USB Wireless Mouse > & KeyBoard V1.01, rev 2.00/0.20, addr 2, iclass 3/1 Hmm, this is what I get upon disconnecting/reconnecting my receiver: ----------------- May 9 10:00:10 econ22 kernel: ukbd0: at uhub3 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected May 9 10:00:10 econ22 kernel: ukbd0: detached May 9 10:00:10 econ22 kernel: ums0: at uhub3 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected May 9 10:00:10 econ22 kernel: ums0: detached May 9 10:00:15 econ22 kernel: ukbd0: Logitech USB Receiver, rev 1.10/30.07, addr 2, iclass 3/1 May 9 10:00:15 econ22 kernel: kbd0 at ukbd0 May 9 10:00:15 econ22 kernel: ums0: Logitech USB Receiver, rev 1.10/30.07, addr 2, iclass 3/1 May 9 10:00:15 econ22 kernel: ums0: 16 buttons and Z dir. ---------------- I found some references (I believe on freebsd-current from January, look for "usb mouse support update plans") to a mouse showing up as a uhid device instead of ums -- apparently, it may not be reporting itself as a kind of mouse the USB mouse driver understands so it falls through to the uhid device. I'm not sure if you ever said, but are you on 6.0-RELEASE or something newer? I upgraded to 6.1, which fixed a lot of other unrelated things for me. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stephanie Bridges Economics Department -- Iowa State University 80B Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011 ph: 515.294.8732 ~~ fax: 515.294.0221 http://www.econ.iastate.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:25:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E6E16A587 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ean@istop.com) Received: from www.istop.com (www.istop.com [209.195.118.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8A843D53 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:25:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ean@istop.com) Received: from istop.com (ns.istop.com [209.195.118.109]) by www.istop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0012017C007; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:25:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:24:59 -0400 (EST) To: "M. Goodell" , "FreeBSD Questions" From: "Ean Kingston" X-Mailer: TWIG 2.7.6 In-Reply-To: <20060509145403.71699.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Remote-IP: 63.250.127.242 Message-Id: <20060509152507.0012017C007@www.istop.com> Cc: Subject: Re: System Intrustion Detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:25:14 -0000 M, There are several choices you can make to deal with this. First, be sure your root password is 'strong'. Generally 'strong' means that it is a combination of upper case, lower case, and numbers with a decent lenght. I personally go with at least 12 characters and throw in some punctuation as well. Also, don't use real words. Second, configure your ssh daemon to only support public key authentication (PubkeyAuthentication, RSAAuthentication). This means every user need to have a public/private key pair. One part stays on the server, the other goes to the remote system and is used to authenticate with the server. This also makes the password attacks you are seeing pretty useless. Third, if your users are all coming in from a relatively small list of IP addresses, you can consider using tcpwrappers (which should have been built in to your sshd daemon). This allows you to configure the sshd daemon to only allow access from a restricted set of ip addresses (or block a specific set of addresses). This method will also stop those messages from appearing in your mail once it is set up properly. I use all three techniques. Unfortunately, I have found that I have to pretty much exclude large parts of the world from accessing my ssh server for the third option to be effective and it is getting worse. I used to have to block only a hand full of countries but I'm now seeing attempts from several continents. "M. Goodell" said: > More and more each day I am seeing my root emails contain hundreds of entries like this: > > May 8 02:23:35 warpstone sshd[26092]: Failed password for root from 222.185.245.208 port 50519 ssh2 > May 8 16:37:41 warpstone ftpd[34713]: FTP LOGIN FAILED FROM 211.44.250.152, Administrator > > Basically, people are attemtpting to hack into my server often with a few thousands of attempts each day. What measures can I take to stop these attempts? Is there a way I can detect these attacks and automatically cut them off? Are any of the security ports effective against this? > > Thank you! > > M Goodell -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:26:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFAC16A4F9 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:26:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0017143D5F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:26:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k49FQbTO082503; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:26:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:26:37 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: jad@nominet.org.uk Message-ID: <20060509152637.GB42081@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20060509145403.71699.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: "M. Goodell" , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: System Intrustion Detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:26:53 -0000 In the last episode (May 09), jad@nominet.org.uk said: > I would suggest using ssh with RSA key pairs and passphrases only. > Dont allow password based login or root login over ssh. Only allow > root to login using the console and use sudo for all admin tasks. > > I have not tried this myself but you could use tcpwrappers and write > a script to add the IP address from repeated failed messages to the > hosts.deny file. There are various scripts already written to do > this. A quick goggle search found this > http://security.linux.com/article.pl?sid=05/09/15/1655234 (its about > linux but I am sure the same approach applies to FreeBSD.) Some more links on securing ssh from password attacks: http://la-samhna.de/library/brutessh.html http://bsdwiki.com/wiki/Blocking_repeated_failed_login_attempts_via_SSH -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:28:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FAB16A61D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Florian.Meister@medienhaus.at) Received: from mhmxu01.tele.net (mhmxu01.tele.net [194.208.21.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8531243DAC for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:27:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Florian.Meister@medienhaus.at) Received: from mhex003.medienhaus.at (194-208-019-042.tele.net [194.208.19.42] (may be forged)) by mhmxu01.tele.net (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k49FReP7090222 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:27:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Florian.Meister@medienhaus.at) Received: from [194.208.22.96] ([194.208.22.96]) by mhex003.medienhaus.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 9 May 2006 17:27:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4460B4EC.9080808@medienhaus.at> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:27:40 +0200 From: Florian Meister User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060428) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2006 15:27:46.0454 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F940B60:01C6737D] X-Virus-enabled: 1 X-Spam-enabled: 1 X-Spam-discard: 0 X-Virus-discard: 1 X-Special-Recipient: @@default@@ X-Recipients: X-Loop-Detect: 1 X-Virus-Flag: NO X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV / www.clamav.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.799 required=5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50 X-Scanning-Time: 3 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 194.208.21.50 Subject: something like devil-linux with freebsd possible ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:28:16 -0000 hi, Because the time I use to manage our freebsd-servers grows and grows I searched the net for something like devil-linux in bsd. DevilLinux (http://www.devil-linux.org) is a nice project which makes it easy to manage a large amount of servers. Every server boots from a devil-linux-cd (or usb-stick, or something) and stores its config somewhere else. If you have to update your systems, burn the cds and change it. If something fails, put the original-cd in, and no problem. If someone has access to your server no binaries can be changed. The config is stored on the usb-stick. It will be loaded into a ramdisk and then the stick is unmounted. So you have the same config after reboot, no matter what you change. (You can do a write-config if you want to save it). I think it's a very nice project, but I am searching for the same in *BSD. Is there such a project around ? thanks, florian -- florian meister EMAIL: florian.meister@medienhaus.at TELEPHONE: +43 5572 501 134 FAX: +43 5572 501 97134 ADDRESS: gutenbergstrasse 1 6858 schwarzach vorarlberg austria WWW: www.medienhaus.at o If practice makes perfect, and nobody's perfect, why practice? o The solution of this problem is trival and is left as an exercise for the reader. o Recursive,adj.; see recursive. _______________________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:36:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874D516A514 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from mail.united-ware.com (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD56743D5A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:36:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.united-ware.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k49Fc4mn011165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 May 2006 11:38:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:36:45 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <62b856460605090524m11ed2afxda3ee0841f7db62f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <62b856460605090524m11ed2afxda3ee0841f7db62f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1428528.BTj351Hh4a"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605091136.52611.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, MYFREEBSD2 autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.1/1451/Mon May 8 19:27:49 2006 on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Michael Grant Subject: Re: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:36:49 -0000 --nextPart1428528.BTj351Hh4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 09 May 2006 08:24, Michael Grant wrote: > I'll try to be more explicit on my requirements. I'm not worried > about mail. I'm mostly worried about web. Each client has a web > site with one or more domains. I currently offer them > apache+php+mysql+mod_perl+mod_ssl. One of them needs java server > pages, tomcat I think. Everyone gets access to their own logs and > to geolizer (webalizer). Some clients would like shell access.=20 > Most clients write their web site using ftp. Certain ones need > also the MS Front Page Extensions. Some clients want an ftp upload > area. Ssl poses a special problem in that I need to allocate an ip > address for those who have their own ssl certificate. It's pretty > much all standard stuff. I use suphp with apache in a mass hosting configuration for about 50=20 websites to take care of the php access issues. You'll need to setup=20 the ACLs correctly so there is no snooping. I then use scponly to=20 allow chrooted sftp access to their web directories. Webalizer logs=20 are automatically generated an placed in their chrooted directory for=20 download. As for shell access I don't allow it. If people want easy command=20 line access I just tell use sshfs on FreeBSD or Linux. The Windows=20 and Mac users don't care about shell access. =46or the Tomcat, Frontpage, and SSL users just setup jails for them. =20 With the inclusion of mergemaster -u subsequent base system upgrades=20 are much less painful. Using null mounts for the common areas should=20 lessen the version sync issues. Once unionfs is stable again, you=20 could just use one jail as a base image and allow the others to be=20 cloned off of that. Hopefully some of the above helps you in your situation. > > But yes, I totally agree with you, it is an administration > nightmare to set up separate jails and keep track of which has > which version of what and so on. There must be an easier way to do > this. Some of you folks who run hosting sites, how do you manage > large numbers of clients? > > Michael Grant > > On 5/9/06, Subhro wrote: > > On 5/9/06, Michael Grant wrote: > > > I host a bunch of websites on my box. Recently I had some > > > problems with file access problems with php which caused me to > > > look into putting each of my clients into their own jail or > > > chroot. I have roughly 100 different domains I'd need to > > > split. > > > > I won't be doing this even if someone pays me twice for doing it. > > This is going to create a HELL lot of problems later on, > > especially during upgrades. > > > > BTW can you tell us your exact requirements? > > > > Thanks and Best Regards > > Subhro > > > > -- > > Subhro Kar > > Security Engineer > > iViZ Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd. > > eRevMax House, 1st Floor > > Plot XI-16, Sector V > > Salt Lake City > > 700091 > > India > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart1428528.BTj351Hh4a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEYLcUxqA5ziudZT0RApAkAKDZvpOlvRssXvVkwij+ftQQJh+1uwCg0SOD T4BVCSZal6gl+uMlpnpkrD0= =Q2H+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1428528.BTj351Hh4a-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:38:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DF516A741 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vcrobe@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745F643D66 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:38:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vcrobe@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i28so1521408nzi for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 08:38:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=UkNV6RyFLTnrEu/rV4t66JXd9XrSYPT8LO4kv/O4XvOQSXHyaOD2OHlMycSFdAwDfsK697Dh5t9Lj7jAy7CaqG9gz0Tj8TNTbsskYO9IZn9baOJSXDhZz84f4bG0iUdHzYcnUPHOSRKqj/qfcI4znICZuZdXA+JhxpR9WoXWTOQ= Received: by 10.36.247.32 with SMTP id u32mr5481021nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 08:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.101.14 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <221c791e0605090838h7fb3a45di89f66f4b860d6246@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:38:05 -0500 From: Robe To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: About Bison and Flex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:38:14 -0000 Hi, I'm a new user of FreeBSD and I want to know if the Bison parser generator and Flex for Linux is available here. Thanx -- Robe. You must be the change you want to see in the world. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:40:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE1916A7AE for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682EF43D72 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:40:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k49FeDAS048104; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:40:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <4460B7D6.9040502@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:40:06 -0500 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <44605ED5.8090805@scii.nl> <20060509141943.GA88511@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060509141943.GA88511@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, albi Subject: Re: details about EOL (of FreeBSD 5.4) ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:40:20 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:20:21AM +0200, albi wrote: >> i'm running 5.4 on a few servers, and i wondered till when >> security-updates will be available >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/security/ says that the EOL is estimated may 31 >> 2006, but does that also mean no more security-updates for 5.4 ? > > Yes. [blink blink] I'm not at all opposed to RE@ and security@ making hard decisions and doing whatever is needed to best further the project's goals (so please don't read this as flame bait). But I have to confirm what I just read: 5.4 is EOL before 5.5 is released, and even before 4.11 and 5.3 are EOL? Or is it really the case that the EOL table should list /2007/ for 5.4 (same day as RELENG_5)? If 2006 is accurate, this is registering on me as a significant POLA violation. Very hard to believe this is accurate. If accurate, what list/channel/forum should I have been paying more attention to? PS - many thanks to all RE, security and all other contributors. Testing of 6.1 is indicating all is well for our purposes and hardware. So if 5.4 really is EOL, we'll move forward, just a little quicker than previously planned. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:43:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CACC16A48B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D7D43D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:43:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k49FhgDV015951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 May 2006 18:43:44 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k49FhxxE013868; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:43:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k49Fhxqb013867; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:43:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:43:58 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Robe Message-ID: <20060509154358.GA13829@gothmog.pc> References: <221c791e0605090838h7fb3a45di89f66f4b860d6246@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <221c791e0605090838h7fb3a45di89f66f4b860d6246@mail.gmail.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.393, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.81, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About Bison and Flex X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:43:55 -0000 On 2006-05-09 10:38, Robe wrote: > Hi, > I'm a new user of FreeBSD and I want to know if the Bison parser generator > and Flex for Linux is available here. Yes. $ which lex yacc /usr/bin/lex /usr/bin/yacc $ which flex /usr/bin/flex $ which bison /usr/local/bin/bison $ The base system includes lex(1) and yacc(1). The lex(1) utility is actually flex(1). You can install bison(1) from the Ports & Packages Collection, i.e. with: # pkg_add -r bison From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:48:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6B516A81C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:48:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380E543D72 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:48:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BA413C7E4; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:51:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B7EA13C7C0; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:51:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788EB13C404; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:51:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:51:08 -0500 (CDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Anish Mistry In-Reply-To: <200605091136.52611.mistry.7@osu.edu> Message-ID: <20060509105029.M26753@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <62b856460605090524m11ed2afxda3ee0841f7db62f@mail.gmail.com> <200605091136.52611.mistry.7@osu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Michael Grant Subject: Re: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:48:29 -0000 > With the inclusion of mergemaster -u subsequent base system upgrades > are much less painful. Using null mounts for the common areas should > lessen the version sync issues. Once unionfs is stable again, you > could just use one jail as a base image and allow the others to be > cloned off of that. ezjail might come in handy as well... http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/ezjail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:52:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6534816A68C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6334343D77 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1497415nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 08:52:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IQSO9ZI93bijYYRPfl36t5EDYw4T4lEA5GVYrTtyzVpkiL6fyhP5xOIgE+PF/CHpiGJyTU7HEkS3Dn/WrE6cwipFKXUEHUnQqD/c6Zno05l9i+IvjawBfwQiffAmwOVxx79WrykWChPda6P/V0KF4VyvtFxu0CHmp03Fbfovycs= Received: by 10.65.15.17 with SMTP id s17mr1723626qbi; Tue, 09 May 2006 08:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.179.13 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <226ae0c60605090852k369c34dft4a826aad4e30573c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:52:50 -0400 From: "David Robillard" To: "FreeBSD Questions Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Broken Compaq ML530 G1 ACPI. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:52:54 -0000 Hi everyone, We have some Compaq ML530 G1 machines and I would like to upgrade them to FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p7. Unfortunately, the ACPI seems to be broken and the systems freeze when booting with ACPI. I did not find a whole lot of info on the mailing list archives. Just this = post http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/2005-December/002324.html from which I tried the patch. But it fails to compile. I then tried using my own AML file built with acpidump(8) and changing loader.conf(5) with the following acpi_dsdt_load=3D"YES" acpi_dsdt_name=3D"/boot/acpi_dsdt.aml" # You may change this name. But again it failed miserably. Can anyone give me a hand with this problem? I am not a member of the freebsd-acpi mailing list, so please reply to me at this address. Many thanks, David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator, CISSP Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 16:03:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BF816A56E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3BB43D67 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:02:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C3C1A3C1A; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F14D951AA9; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:02:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:02:58 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Greg Barniskis Message-ID: <20060509160258.GC89331@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <44605ED5.8090805@scii.nl> <20060509141943.GA88511@xor.obsecurity.org> <4460B7D6.9040502@scls.lib.wi.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4460B7D6.9040502@scls.lib.wi.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, albi , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: details about EOL (of FreeBSD 5.4) ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:03:02 -0000 --ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:40:06AM -0500, Greg Barniskis wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:20:21AM +0200, albi wrote: > >>i'm running 5.4 on a few servers, and i wondered till when > >>security-updates will be available > >> > >>http://www.freebsd.org/security/ says that the EOL is estimated may 31 > >>2006, but does that also mean no more security-updates for 5.4 ? > > > >Yes. >=20 > [blink blink] >=20 > I'm not at all opposed to RE@ and security@ making hard decisions=20 > and doing whatever is needed to best further the project's goals (so=20 > please don't read this as flame bait). But I have to confirm what I=20 > just read: >=20 > 5.4 is EOL before 5.5 is released, and even before 4.11 and 5.3 are=20 > EOL? Or is it really the case that the EOL table should list /2007/=20 > for 5.4 (same day as RELENG_5)? >=20 > If 2006 is accurate, this is registering on me as a significant POLA=20 > violation. Very hard to believe this is accurate. If accurate, what=20 > list/channel/forum should I have been paying more attention to? security@, and the website where this has been announced for a LONG TIME. The policy and rationale is all there. Kris --ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYL0yWry0BWjoQKURAqZoAJ0aON0A1uqVi9BEg+f1IZgyZ3xbagCg494u m7vOBaM1uaU8NOAJjx79fm0= =b1wn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 16:35:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7622216A587 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from mail07.powweb.com (mail07.powweb.com [66.152.97.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93CA43D69 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:35:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (24-119-225-24.cpe.cableone.net [24.119.225.24]) by mail07.powweb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBC214DE1A; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:36:29 -0500 From: "Z.C.B." To: robert Message-ID: <20060509113629.2c37ea59@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <1147161045.9552.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <7daacbbe0601181356q131bc2d7kd044d924e13079f2@mail.gmail.com> <20060507174256.09c33510@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508182308.6e8d9aac@vixen42.vulpes> <20060508184412.4ccbf90c@vixen42.vulpes> <1147161045.9552.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Atom Powers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dominique Goncalves Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf with ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:36:03 -0000 On Tue, 09 May 2006 08:50:45 +0100 robert wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 18:44 -0500, Z.C.B. wrote: > > On Mon, 8 May 2006 16:31:04 -0700 > > "Atom Powers" wrote: > > > > > On 5/8/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > > > On Mon, 8 May 2006 08:27:33 -0700 > > > > "Atom Powers" wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 5/7/06, Z.C.B. wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:56:09 +0100 > > > > > > Dominique Goncalves wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why FreeBSD tries to use ldap database if my user > > > > > > > system is on files ? Thanks for the help. > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you ever find a fix for this? I am running into the > > > > > > same thing myself. > > > > > > > > > > Check your pam.d configuration, > > > > > particularly /etc/pam.d/login > > > > > > > > Probally a silly question, but how would that help with this > > > > problem? > > > > > > > > > > pam controls how each application, including "login" attempts to > > > authenticate. nss controls how user, host information is looked > > > up. > > > > > > I don't know if it will help your problem, I'm struggling > > > through my own pam/nss/ldap issues, but it is a part of the > > > picture. > > > > I am curious. Do you run into problems with SSH and xterm, but > > everything else works? That is what I am currently hitting. > > > > initgroups(kitsune,1001): Invalid argument > > > > Is what it is kicking into /var/log/messages. That is right after > > I authenticate. > > Not sure if this has a bearing on the problem. From the samba by > example web pages whenrefering to ldap: > > Some Linux systems (Novell SUSE Linux in particular) add entries to > the nsswitch.conf file that may cause operational problems with the > configuration methods adopted in this book. It is advisable to > comment out the entries passwd_compat and group_compat where they > are found in this file. > > I too have this problem. Logins worked ok with earlier versions. I > had a setup which worked fine (can't get at the machine at present) > that had no nis line present on the initial install, but when I > tried setting up another machine the nis line has appeared. From my > notes nsswitch.conf looked like this with an earlier version of > freebsd and worked ok: > > passwd: files ldap > shadow: files ldap > group: files ldap > hosts: files dns > networks: files > shells: files I am not using group_compat and passwd_compat with NIS. The following works perfectly fine unless I use xterm or ssh. I've not messed much with pam and ldap yet. I have it setup for auth, but that is all. group: files nis hosts: files dns networks: files passwd: files ldap shells: files From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 16:55:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC1116A5EE for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB4243D5A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:55:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1FdVUM-000F5A-N4; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:55:10 -0600 In-Reply-To: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:55:09 -0600 To: Michael Grant X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:55:19 -0000 On May 9, 2006, at 5:53 AM, Michael Grant wrote: > > When it comes time to upgrade, how does one upgrade 100 different > jails? This will be a nightmare! Actually, not. You only need 1 master jail and a bunch of nullfs read only mounts plus some exclusive space for each jail. I run 44 jails at the moment this way. Upgrading is relatively easy as I only have to upgrade one master jail (and unfortunately lots of jail etc if such happens but a few scripts can automate much of that). I basically set up /local/jails/master and install according to man jail into this place. I never start this jail. I happen to use disk backed md devices as the root for each jail. I mount each on on /local/jail/ Then I do /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/bin /local/jails/adcmw/bin /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/lib /local/jails/adcmw/lib /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/libexec /local/jails/ adcmw/libexec /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/sbin /local/jails/adcmw/ sbin /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/usr /local/jails/adcmw/usr /sbin/mount -t procfs proc /local/jails/adcmw/proc devfs_domount /local/jails/adcmw/dev devfsrules_jail devfs_set_ruleset devfsrules_jail /local/jails/adcmw/dev /sbin/devfs -m /local/jails/adcmw/dev rule -s 4 applyset In my master jail I have some symlinks so that each jail has its own / usr/local/ that is writable. All the jails run out of one installed jail and they also have the side benefit of the main system directories being read only so exploits in one jail cannot affect all the running jails. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:06:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789A716A418 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cruzweb@gmail.com) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.200.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E7B43D66 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:06:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cruzweb@gmail.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-68-61-214-252.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.61.214.252]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2006050917061801300he34me>; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:06:18 +0000 Message-ID: <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:06:19 -0400 From: John Cruz Organization: Cruz Web Development User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@cruzweb.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:06:20 -0000 So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all the documentation is confusing as can be. Would it be easier to download the install mediums and do an upgrade install or is cvsup the better way? if so how do I go about it? the hanbook page on this is somewhat confusing, which is why i'm resorting to posts. Thanks, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:08:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109DF16A4AB for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:08:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A6543D53 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:08:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k49H8F3N051834; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:08:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <4460CC78.8050303@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:08:08 -0500 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <44605ED5.8090805@scii.nl> <20060509141943.GA88511@xor.obsecurity.org> <4460B7D6.9040502@scls.lib.wi.us> <20060509160258.GC89331@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060509160258.GC89331@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, albi Subject: Re: details about EOL (of FreeBSD 5.4) ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:08:17 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:40:06AM -0500, Greg Barniskis wrote: >> If 2006 is accurate, this is registering on me as a significant POLA >> violation. Very hard to believe this is accurate. If accurate, what >> list/channel/forum should I have been paying more attention to? > > security@, and the website where this has been announced for a LONG > TIME. The policy and rationale is all there. OK, thanks. Searched back in my security@ archives and found it, plain as day. The discussion of 5.4's fate did happen long ago. I actually read it carefully at the time but didn't think much of it, believing we'd surely have our servers on 6.x by now. So I totally take back the POLA statement -- I knew this was coming and it was my mistake to forget and let mgmt. defer the upgrade plan. We'll do an interim hop from RELENG_5_4 to RELENG_5, and escalate our path to 6.x adoption. Actually, it'll be nice to wave the EOL stick to force some action on that. Running EOL server parts is against policy. =) -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:20:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4CE16A57F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0982F43D68 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:20:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ0003GUDI6JQ20@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:20:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([80.203.212.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ000HZJDI3CWF0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:20:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:20:25 +0200 From: Kyrre Nygard To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060509191828.0218ca98@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cc: Subject: PAM for Berkeley DB (for a vsftpd virtual user setup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:20:33 -0000 Hello! I need to know how to configure PAM for Berkeley DB so that my vsftpd virtual user setup can function: --- /usr/local/etc/vsftpd.conf listen=YES listen_port=55555 pasv_min_port=53000 pasv_max_port=55000 background=YES max_clients=5 max_per_ip=1 local_enable=YES write_enable=YES guest_enable=YES guest_username=ftp chroot_local_user=YES ascii_download_enable=NO ascii_upload_enable=NO anonymous_enable=NO xferlog_enable=NO secure_chroot_dir=/home/kyrre/ftp rsa_cert_file=/home/kyrre/ftp/.certificate banner_file=/home/kyrre/ftp/.banner --- /usr/local/etc/vsftpd.pw # db4_load -T -t hash -f vsftpd.pw vsftpd.db # chmod 600 vsftpd.db kyrre p4ssw0rd --- /etc/pam.d/ftpd auth required pam_userdb.so db=/usr/local/etc/vsftpd.db account required pam_userdb.so db=/usr/local/etc/vsftpd.db There is no pam_userdb.so on my box, and the vsftpd documentation doesn't seem to cover anything on FreeBSD. What could I do? Thanks, Kyrre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:22:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE41B16A524 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D3843D7B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:22:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-102-190.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.102.190]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 May 2006 13:22:53 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,106,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="200726301:sNHT2945135926" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17504.52960.813275.969325@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:18:24 -0400 To: john@cruzweb.net In-Reply-To: <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta26) "endive" XEmacs Lucid Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:22:14 -0000 John Cruz writes: > So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all > the documentation is confusing as can be. What particularly of cvsup do you find confusing? On the larger question: it /may/ be easier to do a binary upgrade. On the other hand, learning about the cvsup/build{world.kernal} process will teach you new and interesting things about FreeBSD, and make it easier to recover should something go Horribly Wrong. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:30:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CE216A413 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A0443D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:30:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so1230866nfa for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:30:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qKu4RVnsVZ2oDP7iYmfQgEHL1TE671xY1jaHtZ40K1dWevD/MAKPbYN5mP8couXk30MrnqRWI+C2hRd8Sr6+AgO14AF/79iIL3jOMqlgdPY9vrJwjP9BkKqjTOHWZi2tbZjQLbPNtbOhA62XpKNiPz1UNokfv0P9ikEdt5vKoJs= Received: by 10.49.68.1 with SMTP id v1mr2257454nfk; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.5.13 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550605091030v56ec4773y64ac9ed90fb93182@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:30:34 +0200 From: "Daniel A." To: john@cruzweb.net In-Reply-To: <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:30:44 -0000 Which one of the handbook pages are you looking at? Well, anyway. This is what I did (Mind you, my way might have been the wrong way. This is my first time upgrading a FreeBSD installation, too). # cp /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile /root/ - Edit the /root/stable-supfile file to use a mirror near you. # cvsup /root/stable-supfile # cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/ # cp GENERIC MYKERNEL - Edit MYKERNEL to reflect your needs (You could remove some of the device drivers you dont need) # cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL # make installkernel # reboot Now, boot into single-user mode and # mergemaster -p # make installworld # mergemaster # reboot For more details, read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html On 5/9/06, John Cruz wrote: > So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all > the documentation is confusing as can be. Would it be easier to download > the install mediums and do an upgrade install or is cvsup the better > way? if so how do I go about it? the hanbook page on this is somewhat > confusing, which is why i'm resorting to posts. > > Thanks, > > John > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:32:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025BD16A40E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cruzweb@gmail.com) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.200.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C7943D53 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:32:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cruzweb@gmail.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-68-61-214-252.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.61.214.252]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2006050917322901400ko6g8e>; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:32:39 +0000 Message-ID: <4460D22D.8070001@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:32:29 -0400 From: John Cruz Organization: Cruz Web Development User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> <17504.52960.813275.969325@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <17504.52960.813275.969325@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: john@cruzweb.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@cruzweb.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:32:41 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > John Cruz writes: > > >> So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all >> the documentation is confusing as can be. >> > > What particularly of cvsup do you find confusing? > On the larger question: it /may/ be easier to do a binary > upgrade. On the other hand, learning about the > cvsup/build{world.kernal} process will teach you new and interesting > things about FreeBSD, and make it easier to recover should something > go Horribly Wrong. > > > Robert Huff > Specifically it would be the supfile stuff, everything I've been reading says "if you put in the wrong thing here, you can screw the whole system up", and there aren't a lot of concrete examples, just stuff you can add to it. So I guess what I need is a supfile example of everything I need to upadate my kernel and library sources and what not, then I can do a make world on it later. -John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:32:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9AE16A402 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from mail.attiksystem.ch (f29.attiksystem.ch [212.147.59.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B1D43D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:32:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from poweredge.attiksystem.ch (poweredge.attiksystem.ch [10.0.0.29]) by mail.attiksystem.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k49HWfqx046928 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:32:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:32:41 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6739F.5575B6D0"; micalg=SHA1; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D0CAC@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: WebObjects 5 ? Thread-Index: AcZzjpHoYNI0WTgMQmKbV/rzubq37A== From: "Philippe Lang" To: X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 10.0.0.111 Cc: Subject: WebObjects 5 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:32:44 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6739F.5575B6D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Does anyone run WebObjects 5.3 under Freebsd 6.x? Although not officially supported, is it sufficently stable to be used in production? Philippe Lang ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6739F.5575B6D0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCCAocw ggHwoAMCAQICEH9zwUYvHtvw6IJCOxLOs/kwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MDQxMzEzNTE0MVoXDTA3MDQxMzEzNTE0 MVowZzENMAsGA1UEBBMETGFuZzERMA8GA1UEKhMIUGhpbGlwcGUxFjAUBgNVBAMTDVBoaWxpcHBl IExhbmcxKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMPPDiMakqY/55dqY6Y59M/0OBmPPnXodC2Da6SCydQ/noAJ sQttXSG0BR6zcA7WM+Kt9efIYwB5FnNcTEPIaTjbR0NLZq/XvEGQDTb7Owp0PDlghZsN+kK8KJAi OzCcN+fWNbnR9u6HayepO9Q84DU3a1sFqTebCuiJkR8DvJZ5AgMBAAGjOTA3MCcGA1UdEQQgMB6B HHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQF AAOBgQA2FzHGn2/pAED5DqKvHSz+ExQb6UbeAT0yxHc4jDINHY3sWGXO9C19RcBZ1Ol2KU3YlY69 XBAc3Phd5T3YU6CC3vMDTq5+QpXM1yysQtw4OGAfLbQISlKjA8WgdOQAk7BybRvkUbgV2+erDsaN fNaAbD+zEc9WS+VIQ7oZe5n8fzCCAy0wggKWoAMCAQICAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05NjAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0yMDEy MzEyMzU5NTlaMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQH EwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBANRp19SwlGRbcelH2AxRtupykbCEXn0tDY97Et+FJXUodDpC LGMnn5V7S+9+GYcdhuqj3bnOlmQawhRuRKx85o/oTQ9xH0A4pgCjh3j2+ZSGXq3qwF5269kUo11u enwMpUtVfwYZKX+emibVars4JAhqmMex2qOYkf152+VaxBy5AgMBAAGjEzARMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQF MAMBAf8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAx+ySfk749ZalZ2IqpPBNEWDQb41gWGGsJrtSNVwIzzD7 qEqWih9iQiOMFw/0umScF6xHKd+dmF7SbGBxXKKs3Hnj524ARx+1DSjoAp3kmv0T9KbZfLH43F8j JgmRgHPQFBveQ6mDJfLmnC8Vyv6mq4oHdYsM3VGEa+T40c53ooEwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYD VQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5o wHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH 5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8v Y3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYw KQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZ Ohl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NW IXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIC+DCCAvQCAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZy ZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEH9zwUYvHtvw6IJCOxLOs/kwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAdgwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwNTA5MTczMjM5WjAjBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQQxFgQUjPX78jP9cXk6J+wLaDG4wLS5p2AwZwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMVowWDAKBggqhkiG9w0D BzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw BwYFKw4DAhowCgYIKoZIhvcNAgUwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhB/c8FGLx7b8OiCQjsSzrP5MIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRAC CzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0 ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhB/c8FGLx7b 8OiCQjsSzrP5MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGAc1VEmA5bxomAEomtLzRDGmeO/aZxwJciMunJx6s8 ILYjszGyrZQt8EIh1jABgQXbVPtsLQaZOHn6abagwuEwQ6NvfjLVsKlzPSQmrX7zhPcBuX2Ihaiw FjSkvTspi+U2krw0Mz7texIkki4AhMFJn8tlXCho6fMrjh/hrKaeKKoAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6739F.5575B6D0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:34:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2498216A430 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78C943D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:34:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k49HYSQN057572; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:34:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, john@cruzweb.net Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:32:43 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091332.43784.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:34:35 -0000 On Tuesday 09 May 2006 13:06, John Cruz wrote: > So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all > the documentation is confusing as can be. Would it be easier to download > the install mediums and do an upgrade install or is cvsup the better > way? if so how do I go about it? the hanbook page on this is somewhat > confusing, which is why i'm resorting to posts. cvsup is definitely the preferred way to upgrade, and is very easy to use, especially once you get it set up the first time. You need to: 1) Make sure you have cvsup installed pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui OR cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui && make install clean (the latter assumes you have a ports tree on your system) 2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location). Here is mine: *default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all Change the host to a mirror close to you, and change the base to wherever you want the cvsup metadata files stored. Also change the tag to RELENG_6_1 if you want the 6.1 branch instead of 6-STABLE. For more details, see the examples in /usr/share/examples/cvsup and the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html All that the above really says is to put the "RELENG_6" branch of the "src-all" collection into /usr (and actually into /usr/src). 3) Run it cvsup /path/to/your/supfile That's it! In the future, you just have to repeat step 3 to get the latest sources from your selected CVS branch. If you want to move to a different branch in the future (6-STABLE or 6.2 when that happens), it's just a matter of changing the tag in your supfile. Once you have the sources, you have to build and reinstall your kernel and world to actually update your system, but that's covered pretty well in the handbook and elsewhere. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:36:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3809116A484 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9964243D73 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:36:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so1081087wxc for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:36:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NTCoHqgmieKjw6osI+fK8W3oMuydaQ8+28+UTzVI1eMoPwrQwT6ruNWUNM88Y65zzwAknzyAKb+wZuRpiBz3+pKztRHdD4JDjdSXxgpOuzISBMy/rWc7WIMDRJn8JVcnixjENa5bdGQ+S7jckn9JOjd58y4Fakj0N3dwDNTo5eI= Received: by 10.70.60.19 with SMTP id i19mr20518wxa; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.123.7 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8e10486b0605091036u494234d5m685e5ead695ee9ca@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:36:42 -0300 From: "Alexandre Biancalana" To: cblasius In-Reply-To: <445FA039.9010900@o2.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <445FA039.9010900@o2.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enable plugin nppdf.so in firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:36:48 -0000 # cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper # make all install clean # cp /usr/local/share/examples/linuxpluginwrapper/libmap.conf-FreeBSD6 /etc/libmap.conf restart your firefox and open "about:plugins" url to see your installed plugins On 5/8/06, cblasius wrote: > > Hello! > > I've a problem with plugin to view PDF file in firefox. Could someone > help me? > > Wehen I run firefox from command line I obtain this message: > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so > [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined > symbol "XtCalloc"] > > Best regards, > cblasius > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:39:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2276B16A4CB for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@cruzweb.net) Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B2843D58 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:39:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@cruzweb.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-68-61-214-252.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.61.214.252]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20060509173939m1400p6cvhe>; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:39:39 +0000 Message-ID: <4460D3DB.10300@cruzweb.net> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:39:39 -0400 From: John Cruz Organization: Cruz Web Development User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Nielsen References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> <200605091332.43784.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200605091332.43784.lists@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@cruzweb.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:39:44 -0000 John Nielsen wrote: > cvsup is definitely the preferred way to upgrade, and is very easy to use, > especially once you get it set up the first time. > > You need to: > > 1) Make sure you have cvsup installed > pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > OR > cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui && make install clean > (the latter assumes you have a ports tree on your system) > > 2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location). Here is > mine: > > *default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org > *default base=/var/db > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > src-all > > Change the host to a mirror close to you, and change the base to wherever you > want the cvsup metadata files stored. Also change the tag to RELENG_6_1 if > you want the 6.1 branch instead of 6-STABLE. For more details, see the > examples in /usr/share/examples/cvsup and the handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html > > All that the above really says is to put the "RELENG_6" branch of > the "src-all" collection into /usr (and actually into /usr/src). > > 3) Run it > cvsup /path/to/your/supfile > > That's it! In the future, you just have to repeat step 3 to get the latest > sources from your selected CVS branch. If you want to move to a different > branch in the future (6-STABLE or 6.2 when that happens), it's just a matter > of changing the tag in your supfile. > > Once you have the sources, you have to build and reinstall your kernel and > world to actually update your system, but that's covered pretty well in the > handbook and elsewhere. > > JN Aah, thank you! I just need to learn what all that stuff means in the supfile but it's an example I can work with. So that will over-write everything in /usr/src with the new versions then? I'll start the download now, and tomorrow when I get my new server MoBo i'll to the build world thing and should be all set. gracias. -John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:46:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A137116A5BD for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs154.cnf.com (mail-cluster.cnf.com [63.230.177.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF5C43D58 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs154.cnf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ljcqs154.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4FF1C8861; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com (cnfdcx-131-slb-01-in.cnf.com [10.0.108.131]) by ljcqs154.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9651C86A2; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com ([10.40.10.68]) by ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 9 May 2006 10:46:39 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:46:38 -0500 Message-ID: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04390E5E@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) Thread-Index: AcZziwj4b/QOOVhVS1Sy90XmYSt/8gABWsmw From: "Zimmerman, Eric" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2006 17:46:39.0327 (UTC) FILETIME=[865B8EF0:01C67390] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:46:56 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of John Cruz > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 12:06 PM > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) >=20 > So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all > the documentation is confusing as can be. Would it be easier to download > the install mediums and do an upgrade install or is cvsup the better > way? if so how do I go about it? the hanbook page on this is somewhat > confusing, which is why i'm resorting to posts. >=20 > Thanks, Here is the process I use (just did it this morning). I gathered this from a few places and wrote it up for my own reference. Hope it helps http://mikestammer.com/doku.php?id=3Dupdateos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:51:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3103C16A418 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:51:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F57E43D77 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:51:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1FdWMz-000Hl0-9s; Tue, 09 May 2006 11:51:37 -0600 In-Reply-To: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D0CAC@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> References: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D0CAC@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <473215FB-0AF0-497E-8A37-B6F140AC104E@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:51:36 -0600 To: Philippe Lang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WebObjects 5 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:51:42 -0000 On May 9, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Philippe Lang wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone run WebObjects 5.3 under Freebsd 6.x? Although not > officially > supported, is it sufficently stable to be used in production? No problem. I think we are using Java 1.4.2 but we have 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 running on FreeBSD 6.0. Normally we use a Solaris 10 backend with FreeBSD frontend but eveything has to run on the FreeBSD frontend too as a test and currently we have several sites including a 5.3 one (I think it is 5.3) on FreeBSD. Chad > > Philippe Lang --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:53:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA23A16A45A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B852943D97 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:51:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so21004ugf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:51:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lqucGAAuhqH3m6dvcyF6lclk5FP8RLMuSe0m6A2yFOzku1KSqNsGXhm3o78RmhaaaSnTS5bnbXipDbkZGmgAYmLLE/hUDXZiR37dTSzgyHIZud0fWlFEZm4U4zn0Y7bQjOxnUvEAaHBToqIiUQwKNGlBnUeh5aU07iIzbrnFA2M= Received: by 10.78.32.16 with SMTP id f16mr903064huf; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.31.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:51:52 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: john@cruzweb.net In-Reply-To: <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:53:29 -0000 On 5/9/06, John Cruz wrote: > So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all > the documentation is confusing as can be. Would it be easier to download > the install mediums and do an upgrade install or is cvsup the better > way? if so how do I go about it? the hanbook page on this is somewhat > confusing, which is why i'm resorting to posts. > You can use ether method but cvsup is best. Use my cvsup file for an exampl= e: # more ~/standard-supfile *default host=3Dcvsup12.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=3D/var/db *default prefix=3D/usr *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_6_1 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all After you have your cvsup file done run cvsup: cvsup -g -L 2 ~/standard-supfile Then cd into /usr/src and run: make buildworld && make buildkernel && make installkernel Note1: unless you've edited /etc/make.conf it will build the generic kernel, this is a good thing... now reboot. when the system comes back up login and run mergemaster -p, then go into single user mode by typing 'shutdown now'. Now install world: # cd /usr/src # make installworld The last step is to run mergemaster again, without the -p flag. now reboot, your done. It's becomes simple after you've done it a few times... this was just my high level overview so reread the handbook for all the details: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/cvsup.html http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/synching.html http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/makeworld.html -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 18:01:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A27516A65D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B6E43D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:00:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so24557ugf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 11:00:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LOD+GSMqWfDBiJSM2TqC/mzPKBKmof6+ZcLYgRV0+ha9QFTN04oI2zU57P99eNSJf+yKT6UHQX4eO0cFfPHr7rb7lEwvCbAlsfO8Yym8rMgQAe5QGrGA03k5cyIYylU/IkhCsLGX3429idqmKFEmw1byxvPY3JE5nXOfYpAWBww= Received: by 10.78.51.16 with SMTP id y16mr907176huy; Tue, 09 May 2006 11:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.31.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:00:37 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "John Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <200605091332.43784.lists@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> <200605091332.43784.lists@jnielsen.net> Cc: john@cruzweb.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 18:01:57 -0000 On 5/9/06, John Nielsen wrote: [snipped] > > 2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location). Here = is > mine: > > *default host=3Dcvsup12.freebsd.org > *default base=3D/var/db > *default prefix=3D/usr > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_6 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > src-all If he cvsups using that release tag he will get 6-STABLE, not 6.1-RELEASE. -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 18:24:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B8816A694 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 22985075@mynewsletterbuilder.com) Received: from mail.mynewsletterbuilder.com (mail1.mynewsletterbuilder.com [64.34.194.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E899643D90 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:24:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 22985075@mynewsletterbuilder.com) Received: (qmail 15567 invoked by uid 0); 9 May 2006 18:23:39 -0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:23:39 -0400 From: joseph neto Message-ID: <426aa964b139c136cb93534eca50b44b@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer [version 1.73] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: [Newsletter] JOSEPH NETO NEW WEBSITE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: webmaster@quartzcompany.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 18:24:49 -0000 ====================================================================== WWW.QUARTZCOMPANY.COM former UNDERGROUNDBROKER.COM 001 05/2006 ====================================================================== NATURAL LEMURIAN The so powerfull "lemurian wand" natural from the lemurian seed mine in Minas Gerais, Brazil. #feature_link_text# #feature_link_url# THANK YOU As you know I have being alway for a long period because I have had a kidney transplant, thanks to all my friends for your "prayers" and "energy works", it has helped me a great deal. The conforting words of the people that love me gave strenght to pull thru this stronger than before. Now I'm finaly back at work, so I started this new company called "QUARTZ COMPANY". It will be my pleasure to became again your source for unique crystals, I'm now leaving in Brazil so I can spend more time going to the mines and factories, so let me know if you have any special request. THANK YOU http://www.quartzcompany.com POLISHED LEMURIAN LEMURIAN SEED CRYSTALS are found only in the Serra Do Cabral mountain in Minas Gerais, Brazil. POLISHED LEMURIAN http://www.quartzcompany.com/lemurianpoints.html ONE-OF-A-KIND UNIQUELY SHAPED ASTEROID made of natural light smoky quartz, this is a one-of-the-kind piece ASTEROID http://www.quartzcompany.com/one-of-a-kind.html HAWK HILLS >From MELODY First, the hawk hills (there will be more, I'm sure - but the only events that have happened three times with three different people at a minimum is as follows); "Hawk Hills quartz represents the totem of the hawk. It has also been shown to assist one in flying - both astrally, and trough tasks that one needs to accomplish." HAWK HILLS http://www.quartzcompany.com/hawkhills.html LEMURIAN CLUSTER LEMURIAN SEED CRYSTAL CLUSTER It is rarely found lemurian seed in cluster however the miners do not give much value to it, so enjoy these gifts of men lack of knowledge. LEMURIAN CLUSTER http://www.quartzcompany.com/lemuriancluster.html webmaster@quartzcompany.com the underground broker inc. · 6439 milner blvd #4 · orlando · FL · 32809 To subscribe to this newsletter go to http://www.mynewsletterbuilder.com/tools/subscription.php?username=neto&send_id=22985075&l=s&newsletter_id=1409570154 To unsubscribe freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, go to http://www.mynewsletterbuilder.com/tools/subscription.php?username=neto&send_id=22985075&l=u&email=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To change your address or edit your subscription preferences, go to http://www.mynewsletterbuilder.com/tools/subscription.php?username=neto&send_id=22985075&l=p&email=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To forward this email to a friend, go to http://www.mynewsletterbuilder.com/tools/forward.php?username=neto&newsletter_id=1409570154&email=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org&send_id=22985075 To report this email as spam, go to http://www.mynewsletterbuilder.com/tools/spam_report.php?username=neto&send_id=22985075&email=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org This email was sent using MyNewsletterBuilder - Privacy Guaranteed! 60-day trial - http://www.mynewsletterbuilder.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 18:34:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CAC16AABA for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc3910@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD8D43D68 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:33:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc3910@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1815051pya for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IPnabfkeLXWTNaPpHxLoONeVkiSlWNrOAwDM6+lAeF6RWPSH8nG7Wtc3Os2H2jp62BGK/X7ytdatfqmMEzWX7crSlgtYaMWN0QgIBXPznlIvx/YGbRaIyHP5gqEUdWPZ+4utK5sOnM/XgVKisf+6aUqA0A348gMpYlpVdNvIiwI= Received: by 10.35.29.6 with SMTP id g6mr1838160pyj; Tue, 09 May 2006 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.12.14 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51257d370605091133l38a18969v340cde0f54e3a054@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:33:56 -0600 From: "Bryan Curl" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <51257d370605091020s166862e8vf19f0d98c642186e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> <51257d370605091020s166862e8vf19f0d98c642186e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fwd: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 18:34:01 -0000 John, Sorry I think I sent this direct only.... this is being sent to list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bryan Curl Date: May 9, 2006 11:20 AM Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) To: john@cruzweb.net I found this tutorial very helpfull on my first upgrade. http://www.taosecurity.com/keeping_freebsd_applications_up-to-date.html But I must warn you that this process can take hours-days to complete after compiling the entire system from source code and installing, depending of course on how big your setup is and how fast your box is. On the other hand, a two hour download and a week of configuring can be jus= t as grueling. Your choice. On 5/9/06, John Cruz wrote: > > So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all > the documentation is confusing as can be. Would it be easier to download > the install mediums and do an upgrade install or is cvsup the better > way? if so how do I go about it? the hanbook page on this is somewhat > confusing, which is why i'm resorting to posts. > > Thanks, > > John > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -- Bryan bc3910 'at' gmail 'dot' com -- -- Bryan bc3910 'at' gmail 'dot' com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 18:59:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1807516A4A6 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from drone1.qsi.net.nz (drone1-svc-skyt.qsi.net.nz [202.89.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E219343D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:59:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: (qmail 4612 invoked by uid 0); 9 May 2006 18:59:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chen.org.nz) ([202.89.146.5]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 May 2006 18:59:28 -0000 Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8744C5643F; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:59:27 +1200 (NZST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 06:59:27 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: soralx@cydem.org Message-ID: <20060509185927.GB5327@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <200605090416.24346.soralx@cydem.org> <44607B4C.8060801@mac.com> <200605090441.57320.soralx@cydem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605090441.57320.soralx@cydem.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linker wiredness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 18:59:35 -0000 On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 04:41:57AM -0700, soralx@cydem.org wrote: > > > soralx@cydem.org wrote: > > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# rm ./conftest > > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# cc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lstroke > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstroke > > > > > >>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- why??? <<< > > >>>> > > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# ldconfig -r|grep stroke > > > 441:-lstroke.0 => /usr/local/lib/libstroke.so.0 > > > 442:-lgstroke.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstroke.so.0 > > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# cc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -L/usr/local/lib -lstroke > > > [root@soralx /geda-gschem-20060123]# ll ./conftest > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root 1000 5594 May 9 04:06 ./conftest* > > > > > > Am I missing something here? > > > > FreeBSD's linker doesn't add /usr/local/lib to the search path by > > default, unlike some other operating systems. The "-L/usr/local/lib" > > flag is therefore required... > > but ldconfig already found the library (line 441)!? ld(1) doesn't consult ldconfig(8). -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "A person should be able to do a small bit of everything, specialisation is for insects" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:18:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBA916A6EC for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F4243D6A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:18:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.internal (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582DAD5B83B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:17:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by frontend3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 May 2006 15:17:53 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: ONW5P5DhkbJ+M6nSpZUCJKevnTLo5eFyWUHaBYXxvGoN 1147202272 Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DBB5ED8 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:17:52 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 20:17:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <51257d370605091020s166862e8vf19f0d98c642186e@mail.gmail.com> <51257d370605091133l38a18969v340cde0f54e3a054@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51257d370605091133l38a18969v340cde0f54e3a054@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605092017.49190.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Fwd: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:18:13 -0000 On Tuesday 09 May 2006 19:33, Bryan Curl wrote: > I found this tutorial very helpfull on my first upgrade. > > http://www.taosecurity.com/keeping_freebsd_applications_up-to-date.html > > But I must warn you that this process can take hours-days to complete after > compiling the entire system from source code and installing, depending of > course on how big your setup is and how fast your box is. > Unless UPDATING say otherwise, or you are updating across a major version change, there is no particular need to rebuild ports. Building the base system should take hours rather than days. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:22:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1BA16A883 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dtc_crz@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay115-dav17.bay115.hotmail.com [65.54.250.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA5543D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:22:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dtc_crz@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:22:43 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 81.243.161.211 by BAY115-DAV17.phx.gbl with DAV; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:22:40 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [81.243.161.211] X-Originating-Email: [dtc_crz@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dtc_crz@hotmail.com From: "Fred M." To: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:25:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2006 19:22:43.0482 (UTC) FILETIME=[F20FCFA0:01C6739D] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Copyrights X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:22:45 -0000 Hi, I'm from Belgium and I'm very interested in FreeBSD. I've planned to = create a french website about it (commands, how-to's and so on...). I'd like to use the official (brand new) FreeBSD logo, or even Beastie, = but I wonder if I can do it legally or not... Could you tell me more about it ? Thank you From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:48:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C56816A4A0 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4B843D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 58671 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 20:09:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 20:09:09 -0000 Message-ID: <4460F1F0.4070104@123.com.sv> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:48:00 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikolas Britton References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> <200605091332.43784.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: john@cruzweb.net, John Nielsen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:48:33 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 5/9/06, John Nielsen wrote: > > [snipped] > >> >> 2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location). >> Here is >> mine: >> >> *default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org >> *default base=/var/db >> *default prefix=/usr >> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 >> *default delete use-rel-suffix >> *default compress >> src-all > > > If he cvsups using that release tag he will get 6-STABLE, not > 6.1-RELEASE. > > is that info (tags meaning) available somewhere in the handbook?, im running 6.1-RC1 and want to upgrade to 6.1-RELEASE, or better to 6.1-STABLE, what tag should i use? RELENG??? --- Miguel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:54:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4886916A519 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from os@odots.org) Received: from ikkefulltsaalilleole.odots.org (138.80-203-29.nextgentel.com [80.203.29.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D829843D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:54:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from os@odots.org) Received: from [10.0.4.4] (helo=[10.0.4.4]) by ikkefulltsaalilleole.odots.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FdYCG-00017N-No for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:48:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4460F42B.2080401@odots.org> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:57:31 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind_Skaar?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060228 SeaMonkey/1.5a MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Promise SATA controller / Maxtor drive problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:54:50 -0000 Hi I've got a Promise SATAII 150 TX2plus (pci) controller connected to my Asus A7N8X Deluxe motherboard. The drive in question is a Maxtor 6B200M0. First of all, when the drive is connected I can't get any resent FreeBSD boot cd to do anything but a "intsant reboot" - it starts to load, some text flashes and the computer reboots. When booting from floppies or with the drive disconnected (just reconnect it when I get to the menu) I get this: ad4: Maxtor 6B200M0 BANC1B70 ad4: 398297088 sectors [395136C/16H/63S] 16 sectors/intrupts 1 depth queue ad4: Promise check1 failed ad4: Adaptec check1 failed ad4: LSI (v3) check1 failed ad4: LSI (v2) check1 failed ad4: FreeBSD check1 failed GEOM: new disk ad4 Any ideas? The drive passed all the Maxtor PowerMax tests.. Should I get a dmesg? thanks, ö -- Øyvind Skaar | os guesswhat odots.org | 482 78 480 | http://odots.org http://last.fm/user/%67%69%7A%7A%6C%6Fn | http://43things.com/person/%C3%B8s 6865792c207768617420646f20796f75206b6e6f772c 796f752772652061206e65726420746f6f202e2e From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:55:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3542816A426 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (mail-cluster.cnf.com [63.230.177.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDD343D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:55:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93F314C060; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com (cnfdcx-131-slb-01-in.cnf.com [10.0.108.131]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB74814C076; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com ([10.40.10.68]) by ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 9 May 2006 12:55:44 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:55:42 -0500 Message-ID: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04390EDC@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) Thread-Index: AcZzoZ6YI42QE5OeRvKgHEgwZ5b0iQAAOW7g From: "Zimmerman, Eric" To: "Miguel" , "Nikolas Britton" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2006 19:55:44.0522 (UTC) FILETIME=[8EDA86A0:01C673A2] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: john@cruzweb.net, John Nielsen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:55:49 -0000 > is that info (tags meaning) available somewhere in the handbook?, im > running 6.1-RC1 and want to upgrade to 6.1-RELEASE, or better to > 6.1-STABLE, what tag should i use? > RELENG??? > --- RELENG_6_1 I believe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:57:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1875016A43B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:57:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA1143D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:57:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k49JvDQN051678; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:57:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:57:12 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460F1F0.4070104@123.com.sv> In-Reply-To: <4460F1F0.4070104@123.com.sv> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091557.12774.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Miguel Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:57:18 -0000 On Tuesday 09 May 2006 15:48, Miguel wrote: > Nikolas Britton wrote: > > On 5/9/06, John Nielsen wrote: > >> 2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location). > >> Here is > >> mine: > >> > >> *default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org > >> *default base=/var/db > >> *default prefix=/usr > >> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 > >> *default delete use-rel-suffix > >> *default compress > >> src-all > > > > If he cvsups using that release tag he will get 6-STABLE, not > > 6.1-RELEASE. > > is that info (tags meaning) available somewhere in the handbook?, im > running 6.1-RC1 and want to upgrade to 6.1-RELEASE, or better to > 6.1-STABLE, what tag should i use? > RELENG??? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html RELENG_6_1 == tag for FreeBSD 6.1 security branch RELENG_6 == tag for FreeBSD 6-STABLE development branch. If you want 6.1-RELEASE use the first one. If you want 6.1-STABLE use the second one. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:57:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32F116A55D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF9143D4C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:57:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-102-190.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.102.190]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 May 2006 15:58:27 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,106,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="200837369:sNHT22444060" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17504.62291.380603.709216@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:53:55 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4460D22D.8070001@gmail.com> References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> <17504.52960.813275.969325@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4460D22D.8070001@gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta26) "endive" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:57:44 -0000 John Cruz writes: > > What particularly of cvsup do you find confusing? > > Specifically it would be the supfile stuff, everything I've been > reading says "if you put in the wrong thing here, you can screw > the whole system up", A bad supfile will mess up _the source tree_; one could possibly screw up the system by setting "prefix=/" ... but that's rather farfetched. And the cure for a garbled source tree is a) put the right stuff in the supfile then b) "rm -rf /usr/src/*" and c) re-run cvsup. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:59:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADFC16A6A9 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:59:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E09743D58 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:58:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1551871nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 12:58:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=a3mT0JlAHHxvNJ/P2ADejTuvFo2lsPGPqjcpbnczC+ltY2OAix+t39xBMTTiLF9Rka2NYVpNwtnXV8Axt76v/pgmTMCdQ1iS8moJiU7dv1FuYyxzRgryFOZ58UhIbHVwtjg9D6n0JbCPcEZvpmru1jWLEi90UIIQxPMCxD3UXbg= Received: by 10.65.107.11 with SMTP id j11mr1934320qbm; Tue, 09 May 2006 12:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.126.4 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:58:58 +0300 From: "Vlad GURDIGA" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Too many holes in the physical address space, giving up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:59:04 -0000 SGVsbG8sCgpJIGdvdCAyeDUxMiBNQiAgRERSMiAoMjQwKSBQQzUzMDAgNjY3TUhaIENMNS4wIFRX SU5NT1Mgb24gYW4gSW50ZWwKRDk1NVhCSyBtb3RoZXJib2FyZCB3aXRoIGR1YWwgY2hhbm5lbCwg YW5kIGV2ZXJ5IHRpbWUgb24gYm9vdCBJIHNlZQp0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgYmVmb3JlIHRoZSBkbWVz ZzoKCgpGcmVlQlNEL2kzODYgYm9vdHN0cmFwIGxvYWRlciwgUmV2aXNpb24gMS4xCihyb290QGJl c2Eub3JnLCBUdWUgTWF5ICA5IDIyOjE2OjQ0IEVFU1QgMjAwNikKTG9hZGluZyAvYm9vdC9kZWZh dWx0cy9sb2FkZXIuY29uZgovYm9vdC9rZXJuZWwva2VybmVsIHRleHQ9MHgyODg5MzggZGF0YT0w eDMyNWUwKzB4MmQ0YTggc3ltcz1bMHg0KzB4M2Q0MzArMHg0KzB4NApkYzM0XQovCkhpdCBbRW50 ZXJdIHRvIGJvb3QgaW1tZWRpYXRlbHksIG9yIGFueSBvdGhlciBrZXkgZm9yIGNvbW1hbmQgcHJv bXB0LgpCb290aW5nIFsvYm9vdC9rZXJuZWwva2VybmVsXS4uLgovYm9vdC9rZXJuZWwvYWNwaS5r byB0ZXh0PTB4NDJlZDQgZGF0YT0weDIyODArMHgxMGYwIHN5bXM9WzB4NCsweDdhZDArMHg0KzB4 YTcwOQpdClRvbyBtYW55IGhvbGVzIGluIHRoZSBwaHlzaWNhbCBhZGRyZXNzIHNwYWNlLCBnaXZp bmcgdXAKVG9vIG1hbnkgaG9sZXMgaW4gdGhlIHBoeXNpY2FsIGFkZHJlc3Mgc3BhY2UsIGdpdmlu ZyB1cApUb28gbWFueSBob2xlcyBpbiB0aGUgcGh5c2ljYWwgYWRkcmVzcyBzcGFjZSwgZ2l2aW5n IHVwCkNvcHlyaWdodCAoYykgMTk5Mi0yMDA2IFRoZSBGcmVlQlNEIFByb2plY3QuCkNvcHlyaWdo dCAoYykgMTk3OSwgMTk4MCwgMTk4MywgMTk4NiwgMTk4OCwgMTk4OSwgMTk5MSwgMTk5MiwgMTk5 MywgMTk5NAogICAgICAgIFRoZSBSZWdlbnRzIG9mIHRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIENhbGlmb3Ju aWEuIEFsbCByaWdodHMgcmVzZXJ2ZWQuCkZyZWVCU0QgNi4xLVJDICMzOiBTdW4gQXByIDMwIDIx OjE3OjAwIEVFU1QgMjAwNgouLi4KCgoKQXJlIHRoZSA0IG1lc3NhZ2VzIGFib3V0ICJUb28gbWFu eSBob2xlcyBpbiB0aGUgcGh5c2ljYWwgYWRkcmVzcwpzcGFjZSwgZ2l2aW5nIHVwIiB0ZWxsaW5n IHRoYXQgdGhlcmUgaXMgYSBwcm9ibGVtPwo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:02:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6848216A4BF for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24BF43D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:02:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C071CC8F; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:02:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DANGER (unknown [217.73.23.230]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8DB1CC6D; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:02:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:02:08 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.14) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <546965456.20060509220208@rulez.sk> To: Miguel In-Reply-To: <4460F1F0.4070104@123.com.sv> References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460CC0B.8050209@gmail.com> <200605091332.43784.lists@jnielsen.net> <4460F1F0.4070104@123.com.sv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.567 X-Spam-Level: Cc: john@cruzweb.net, John Nielsen , Nikolas Britton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:02:23 -0000 Hello Miguel, Tuesday, May 9, 2006, 9:48:00 PM, you typed the following: > Nikolas Britton wrote: > is that info (tags meaning) available somewhere in the handbook?, im > running 6.1-RC1 and want to upgrade to 6.1-RELEASE, or better to > 6.1-STABLE, what tag should i use? > RELENG??? RELENG_6 = 6.1-STABLE RELENG_6_1 = 6.1-RELEASE -- Sincerely, Daniel Gerzo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:03:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5F416A7D9 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard2.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F0243D77 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:03:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 60218 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 20:24:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 20:24:31 -0000 Message-ID: <4460F589.7010503@123.com.sv> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:03:21 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Nielsen References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <4460F1F0.4070104@123.com.sv> <200605091557.12774.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200605091557.12774.lists@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:03:54 -0000 John Nielsen wrote: >On Tuesday 09 May 2006 15:48, Miguel wrote: > > >>Nikolas Britton wrote: >> >> >>>On 5/9/06, John Nielsen wrote: >>> >>> >>>>2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location). >>>>Here is >>>>mine: >>>> >>>>*default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org >>>>*default base=/var/db >>>>*default prefix=/usr >>>>*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 >>>>*default delete use-rel-suffix >>>>*default compress >>>>src-all >>>> >>>> >>>If he cvsups using that release tag he will get 6-STABLE, not >>>6.1-RELEASE. >>> >>> >>is that info (tags meaning) available somewhere in the handbook?, im >>running 6.1-RC1 and want to upgrade to 6.1-RELEASE, or better to >>6.1-STABLE, what tag should i use? >>RELENG??? >> >> > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html > >RELENG_6_1 == tag for FreeBSD 6.1 security branch >RELENG_6 == tag for FreeBSD 6-STABLE development branch. > >If you want 6.1-RELEASE use the first one. If you want 6.1-STABLE use the >second one. > >JN > > Great, i will upgrade today, regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:04:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8368E16A5E2 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2BE43D70 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:03:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdYQr-000Kh3-Cf; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:03:55 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:03:49 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZzo6+g7mJWat+WEdqxMAAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20060509104913.02ea3dc8@mailsvr.xxiii.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:04:01 -0000 On 9/5/06 15:57, "wc_fbsd@xxiii.com" wrote: > At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote: >> I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so >> is the font they've started to use since the announcement of >> FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At > > Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint. > > But if you're trying to "sell" FreeBSD to a boss or customer, a > serious, business-like web site surely helps. The new one seems to > borrow too much from the "hax0r" community's appearance. > > And the font overflows and looks like complete shit on my > browser; usually this would just be blamed on using a "Non Microsoft > Browser" (FireFox on windoze) but until we have IE for FBSD, it seems > a legit complaint. The font overflows? We didn't change the font. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:04:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB1816A74A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CEB43D62 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:04:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdYRW-000Oik-FG; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:04:32 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:04:31 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: cpghost , Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZzo8ioB2QZY9+XEdqxMAAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <20060509105647.GA89879@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:04:42 -0000 On 9/5/06 11:56, "cpghost" wrote: > > Semi-seriously, www@: how about offering people a chance to individually > customize that logo away? It's not really THAT important, but setting > up a transparent proxy just to filter that banner out is kind of silly > waste of time. Specify your own stylesheet, move along. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:05:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777EC16A69B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13B743D76 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:04:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdYRt-000O7f-3U; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:04:54 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:04:54 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Kep Woof , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZzo9ZeFLrgFd+XEdqxMAAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:05:02 -0000 On 9/5/06 10:52, "Kep Woof" wrote: > Hi, > > I guess this is the wrong list, but I just looked at freebsd.org and > saw the new logo. I really think it looks terrible. Everyone that > I've spoken to agrees. It looks like some kind of sextoy/spacehopper, > and not becomming to the enterprise os we know and love. Maybe it was > the best from the competition you had, but I don't think it's good > enough. Is there somewhere this was discussed? The new logo already > looks last year. Is there a plan to redesign it each year as design > trends come and go? If you compare it to the debian, IBM, BMW, > greenpeace, or google logos, the design relates in some way to the > subject. I don't see that happening here. > > Sorry if this is too late, or an unpopular opinion, or in the wrong > place, but I just wondered if anyone thinks the new logo is good, and > how long it's expected to last. > > Interested to hear what people think, I think you're trolling. Well done anyway. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:20:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D132F16A4A6 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA6D43D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:20:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1841092pya for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 13:20:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=LwndpT6d2wkk3UjMa0f92Le/ND1Eu1E1D0hw8kXgWg3U2ACP/TbMOY/TOk7uvbDB2cnk0hFlG0tvUVjAdCzdY48+qcxfl9RqFGJ02QfxGoZLIRCI++WbUeYMkFqhChEHrTM5ix7kdijVWYIsEe1LsWwi9JvmIbHKV/4YtpORP2M= Received: by 10.35.109.2 with SMTP id l2mr3385756pym; Tue, 09 May 2006 13:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.12.4 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:20:42 -0400 From: "michael johnson" To: "Ceri Davies" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060509104913.02ea3dc8@mailsvr.xxiii.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ahze@ahze.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:20:43 -0000 On 5/9/06, Ceri Davies wrote: > > On 9/5/06 15:57, "wc_fbsd@xxiii.com" wrote: > > > At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote: > >> I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so > >> is the font they've started to use since the announcement of > >> FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At > > > > Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint. > > > > But if you're trying to "sell" FreeBSD to a boss or customer, a > > serious, business-like web site surely helps. The new one seems to > > borrow too much from the "hax0r" community's appearance. > > > > And the font overflows and looks like complete shit on my > > browser; usually this would just be blamed on using a "Non Microsoft > > Browser" (FireFox on windoze) but until we have IE for FBSD, it seems > > a legit complaint. > > The font overflows? We didn't change the font. I don't know about font overflows but I get the following http://people.freebsd.org/~ahze/bad-new-icon.png Michael Ceri > -- > That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. > -- Moliere > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:26:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66ABB16A659 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F09D43D70 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:26:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1842486pya for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 13:26:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Xd4Gr6NqMkCc1h1s2CqqHZPMoU/wmlfUlcG4ZJd7jNCUiJrHYM+bQowrA0x2ZoCR49N6qH4Cd99x8cFconBSWcuFcXSNQw0P2+gIJIMCd555h4JuCboMj6xk5vz++dg+w4/eKjeheeFNa18EvTddhN+XmCvbsh5j7q7EKEB3JsQ= Received: by 10.35.9.2 with SMTP id m2mr1437040pyi; Tue, 09 May 2006 13:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.12.4 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:26:24 -0400 From: "michael johnson" To: "Ceri Davies" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060509104913.02ea3dc8@mailsvr.xxiii.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ahze@ahze.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:26:39 -0000 On 5/9/06, michael johnson wrote: > > > > On 5/9/06, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > > On 9/5/06 15:57, "wc_fbsd@xxiii.com" wrote: > > > > > At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote: > > >> I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so > > >> is the font they've started to use since the announcement of > > >> FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At > > > > > > Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint. > > > > > > But if you're trying to "sell" FreeBSD to a boss or customer, a > > > serious, business-like web site surely helps. The new one seems to > > > borrow too much from the "hax0r" community's appearance. > > > > > > And the font overflows and looks like complete shit on my > > > browser; usually this would just be blamed on using a "Non Microsoft > > > Browser" (FireFox on windoze) but until we have IE for FBSD, it seems > > > a legit complaint. > > > > The font overflows? We didn't change the font. > > > I don't know about font overflows but I get the following > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ahze/bad-new-icon.png > ehh, just ignore this. Something was cached, when I bypass proxy it works as intended. Sorry for the noise. Michael Michael > > > Ceri > > -- > > That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. > > -- Moliere > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:31:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5584216A596 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFC6243D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 20359 invoked by uid 89); 9 May 2006 20:31:34 -0000 Received: from 204-8-12-66.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@204.8.12.66) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 9 May 2006 20:31:34 -0000 Message-ID: <4460FC0A.5030306@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:31:06 -0400 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4460F42B.2080401@odots.org> In-Reply-To: <4460F42B.2080401@odots.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Promise SATA controller / Maxtor drive problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:31:36 -0000 Øyvind Skaar wrote: > > Hi > > I've got a Promise SATAII 150 TX2plus (pci) controller connected to my > Asus A7N8X Deluxe motherboard. > The drive in question is a Maxtor 6B200M0. > I had 6 Maxtor SATA drives running under FreeBSD 5.2.1 up to 5.4. Installed on three mail servers. After 6 months and 7 drive swaps I had my vendor send Seagate drives and all my problems disappeared. Issues varied from drives just "falling off" to DMA issues, to drives showing as corrupted and then testing good at the vendor after being returned. These were Maxtor 6Y080M0 and 6Y160MO drives. Running under onboard SATA or Highpoint Rocket Raid cards. Systems are SuperMicro, three servers delivered at the same time, one server was replaced after 3 months but problems continued until it's drives were replaced as well (the replacement server came with Maxtor drives installed again). I tested for cable issues, Goggled for FreebSD issues, updated the kernel, BIOS changes, drive settings, heat issues, etc. No joy. With no other changes than an upgrade to Seagate drives the systems have run without intervention for 11 months now. These are high traffic mail toasters. The Maxtor drives were problematic for us from the start, and not even heavy enough to make good door stops. DAve -- This message was checked by forty monkeys and found to not contain any SPAM whatsoever. Your monkeys may vary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:36:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F1C16A62E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A6043D64 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:36:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so88711ugf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 13:36:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ka5DBjZRybiu1C0oLN720UL7MgB+W1vznG1iThkqc2XIyylZact8TOuzGPK2izuAtWB5MoQqEX6nlWRiFEiXTmAXOQWlFTi1fi3YvTdKSE6kaUpZPDA7C2C+uwwznubdowmwVAwEGmeaZNxKhO+ehgUPNbbj5aAvcVZRx1oXMRM= Received: by 10.78.51.9 with SMTP id y9mr938081huy; Tue, 09 May 2006 13:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.33.6 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:29:43 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: freebsd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_28046_17492228.1147206583107" Subject: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:36:44 -0000 ------=_Part_28046_17492228.1147206583107 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi list, I'm upgrading an x86 from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.1-RELEASE (RELENG_6_1). -> The CPU is hw.machine: i386 hw.model: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron -> I have these options specified in /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE=3Dpentium3[m] CFLAGS=3D -O2 -pipe COPTFLAGS=3D -O2 -pipe -> I'm getting this errors at make buildworld (stage 4.2: building librarie= s) /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c:1: error: bad value (pentium3[m]) for -march=3D switch /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c:1: error: bad value (pentium3[m]) for -mtune=3D switch The log of stage 4.2 of make buildworld is below. Any ideas? Thank you, best regards --- START OF LOG --- -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> stage 4.2: building libraries -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=3D/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=3Di386=20 MACHINE=3Di386 CPUTYPE=3Dpentium3[m]=20 GROFF_BIN_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin=20 GROFF_FONT_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/groff_font=20 GROFF_TMAC_PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/tmac=20 _SHLIBDIRPREFIX=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp INSTALL=3D"sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh"=20 PATH=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr= /bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/u= sr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/s= bin:/usr/bin make -f Makefile.inc1 DESTDIR=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp -DNO_FSCHG -DNO_HTML -DNO_INFO -DNO_LINT -DNO_MAN -DNO_NLS -DNO_PROFILE libraries cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 _startup_libs; make -f Makefile.inc1 _prebuild_libs; make -f Makefile.inc1 _generic_libs; =3D=3D=3D> gnu/lib/csu (depend,all,install) make -f /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile MFILE=3D/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile GCCDIR=3D/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc tconfig.h echo '#ifndef GCC_TCONFIG_H' > tconfig.h echo '#define GCC_TCONFIG_H' >> tconfig.h echo '#ifdef IN_GCC' >> tconfig.h echo '# include "ansidecl.h"' >> tconfig.h echo '#endif' >> tconfig.h echo '#define USED_FOR_TARGET' >> tconfig.h echo '#endif /* GCC_TCONFIG_H */' >> tconfig.h make -f /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile MFILE=3D/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile GCCDIR=3D/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc tm.h echo '#ifndef GCC_TM_H' > tm.h echo '#define GCC_TM_H' >> tm.h echo '#ifdef IN_GCC' >> tm.h echo '#include "i386/i386.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "i386/unix.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "i386/att.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "dbxelf.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "elfos.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "freebsd-native.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "freebsd-spec.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "freebsd.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "i386/freebsd.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "defaults.h"' >> tm.h echo '#if !defined GENERATOR_FILE && !defined USED_FOR_TARGET' >> tm.h echo '# include "insn-constants.h"' >> tm.h echo '# include "insn-flags.h"' >> tm.h echo '#endif' >> tm.h echo '#endif' >> tm.h echo '#define EXTRA_MODES_FILE "i386/i386-modes.def"' >> tm.h echo '#endif /* GCC_TM_H */' >> tm.h rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -DCRT_BEGIN -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/config -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c cc -O2 -pipe -march=3Dpentium3[m] -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-unit-at-a-time -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/config -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc -I.=20 -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools -g0 -DCRT_BEGIN -c -o crtbegin.o /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c:1: error: bad value (pentium3[m]) for -march=3D switch /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c:1: error: bad value (pentium3[m]) for -mtune=3D switch *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. --- END OF LOG --- -- Pietro Cerutti ------=_Part_28046_17492228.1147206583107 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=4.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Attachment-Id: f_en0p4af8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="4.2" -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> stage 4.2: building libraries -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/groff_font GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/tmac _SHLIBDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp INSTALL="sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh" PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin make -f Makefile.inc1 DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp -DNO_FSCHG -DNO_HTML -DNO_INFO -DNO_LINT -DNO_MAN -DNO_NLS -DNO_PROFILE libraries cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 _startup_libs; make -f Makefile.inc1 _prebuild_libs; make -f Makefile.inc1 _generic_libs; ===> gnu/lib/csu (depend,all,install) make -f /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile MFILE=/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile GCCDIR=/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc tconfig.h echo '#ifndef GCC_TCONFIG_H' > tconfig.h echo '#define GCC_TCONFIG_H' >> tconfig.h echo '#ifdef IN_GCC' >> tconfig.h echo '# include "ansidecl.h"' >> tconfig.h echo '#endif' >> tconfig.h echo '#define USED_FOR_TARGET' >> tconfig.h echo '#endif /* GCC_TCONFIG_H */' >> tconfig.h make -f /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile MFILE=/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile GCCDIR=/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc tm.h echo '#ifndef GCC_TM_H' > tm.h echo '#define GCC_TM_H' >> tm.h echo '#ifdef IN_GCC' >> tm.h echo '#include "i386/i386.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "i386/unix.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "i386/att.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "dbxelf.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "elfos.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "freebsd-native.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "freebsd-spec.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "freebsd.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "i386/freebsd.h"' >> tm.h echo '#include "defaults.h"' >> tm.h echo '#if !defined GENERATOR_FILE && !defined USED_FOR_TARGET' >> tm.h echo '# include "insn-constants.h"' >> tm.h echo '# include "insn-flags.h"' >> tm.h echo '#endif' >> tm.h echo '#endif' >> tm.h echo '#define EXTRA_MODES_FILE "i386/i386-modes.def"' >> tm.h echo '#endif /* GCC_TM_H */' >> tm.h rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -DCRT_BEGIN -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/config -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium3[m] -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-unit-at-a-time -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/config -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../usr.bin/cc/cc_tools -g0 -DCRT_BEGIN -c -o crtbegin.o /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c:1: error: bad value (pentium3[m]) for -march= switch /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc/crtstuff.c:1: error: bad value (pentium3[m]) for -mtune= switch *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/lib/csu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. ------=_Part_28046_17492228.1147206583107-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:55:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EDA16A41F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3081543D5C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:55:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1251CCFD; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:55:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DANGER (unknown [217.73.23.230]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B411CCFE; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:54:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:54:44 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.14) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1096275265.20060509225444@rulez.sk> To: "michael johnson" In-Reply-To: References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060509104913.02ea3dc8@mailsvr.xxiii.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.567 X-Spam-Level: Cc: ahze@ahze.net, Ceri Davies , questions@freebsd.org, wc_fbsd@xxiii.com Subject: Re[2]: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:55:05 -0000 Hi michael, Tuesday, May 9, 2006, 10:20:42 PM, you wrote about: > On 5/9/06, Ceri Davies wrote: > I don't know about font overflows but I get the following > http://people.freebsd.org/~ahze/bad-new-icon.png reload your css files. > Michael -- Regards, Daniel Gerzo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 21:21:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC9F16A416 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE18443D55 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:21:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so106076ugf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:21:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hswa6ezo7+C6T0MFoGEkCohNZM4R/htbMkGFoXPY2zMlS1Z8mmuQ+6wDsrY2OWtEQIr1g4VY4flZxrhseTt/265ggx2pUVz0Xsg7oA9Ryy1fX6g7wmItRoTtlBWdlbeDh4aXTlq328y/cZcI93+bNQ8qXXHPGvGhc1AsPwZ7uno= Received: by 10.78.29.13 with SMTP id c13mr938698huc; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.33.6 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:21:52 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: freebsd In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:21:55 -0000 On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > CPUTYPE=3Dpentium3[m] I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf ? # (Intel CPUs) nocona pentium4[m] prescott pentium3[m] pentium-m # pentium2 pentiumpro pentium-mmx pentium i486 i386 Thanx, > -- > Pietro Cerutti > -- Pietro Cerutti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 21:29:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC8916A582 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE2943D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:29:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (83.253.29.241) by pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.072.1) id 44609CD600022B33 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:29:17 +0200 Received: (qmail 18174 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 23:29:16 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 9 May 2006 23:29:16 +0200 Received: (qmail 34165 invoked by uid 1001); 9 May 2006 23:29:16 +0200 Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:29:16 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20060509212916.GA34153@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Pietro Cerutti , freebsd References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:29:19 -0000 On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:21:52PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > >CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] > > I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. > > So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of > /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf ? > > # (Intel CPUs) nocona pentium4[m] prescott pentium3[m] pentium-m > # pentium2 pentiumpro pentium-mmx pentium i486 i386 > It is just a shorthand for 'pentium3 pentium3m'. The [xxx] syntax is often used in used in Unix documentation to denote an optional part of a command line (or similar.) In this case it is the letter 'm' which can be added or not. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 21:32:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6E316A560 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@noc.mainstreet.net) Received: from noc.mainstreet.net (noc.mainstreet.net [207.5.0.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F67543D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@noc.mainstreet.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by noc.mainstreet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97E928458 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from noc.mainstreet.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (noc.mainstreet.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44314-19 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by noc.mainstreet.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 3F23128456; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:32:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Kent To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060509213253.3F23128456@noc.mainstreet.net> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: threads in 5.4 and 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:32:54 -0000 Hello, What is the canonical way to compile programs that use posix threads on freebsd 5.4+, with gcc? I've seen comments that say that -pthread, used in 4.x, should go away for 5.x. But, for example, /usr/ports/security/openssl uses -pthread. So, use it? Don't use it? Should I care? And what does it mean when a program works with one thread library and not another? I've got a case like this: libpthread.so.1: chew up cpu, then SEGV libthr.so.1: chew up cpu, but works! libc_r.so.5: works great! This is changed with libmap.conf. Does this point to any particular shady coding practice? Once I know that libc_r is my friend, does this suggest a certain set of compile flags and/or link flags? Thanks, -mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 21:34:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A95916A47D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BE643D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:34:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.internal (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD34D5B355 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:34:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by frontend3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 May 2006 17:34:55 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: m1pccFJyka7yCfcK68ku2eQnaoTgncMD4ZDz4OnpfVcG 1147210495 Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102245EF8 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:34:54 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:34:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605092234.53188.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:34:56 -0000 On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:21, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > CPUTYPE=pentium3[m] > > I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. > > So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of > /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf ? [] is usually shorthand for an optional variant i.e. pentium3[m] means pentium3 or pentium3m From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 21:50:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5045B16A40D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8C343D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:50:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k49Lodrq045569; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:50:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:50:39 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Mark Kent Message-ID: <20060509215039.GB94315@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20060509213253.3F23128456@noc.mainstreet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060509213253.3F23128456@noc.mainstreet.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads in 5.4 and 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:50:40 -0000 In the last episode (May 09), Mark Kent said: > What is the canonical way to compile programs that use posix threads > on freebsd 5.4+, with gcc? > > I've seen comments that say that -pthread, used in 4.x, should go > away for 5.x. But, for example, /usr/ports/security/openssl uses > -pthread. -pthread is still the recommended way, I think. > And what does it mean when a program works with one thread > library and not another? I've got a case like this: > > libpthread.so.1: chew up cpu, then SEGV > libthr.so.1: chew up cpu, but works! > libc_r.so.5: works great! > > This is changed with libmap.conf. > > Does this point to any particular shady coding practice? Could point to a race between two threads that is only lost when the threads actually run on two CPUs. libc_r switches between threads on a single processor, where libthr and libpthread allow multiple threads to execute at once. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 21:55:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FC916A48E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C2E43D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:55:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so115102ugf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:55:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Vq37e1zm82fVgjND8gZ0XaEjl12iMS/TnRWwcq9RIW/rOVGjZnKyY5RRwPiz6C4mosfgh7B5vyIFt6XfmGdRZ8ZItqKPBLqJCrCOB3rgih+VFUBZUFV/th0RFTaAKY5F0wF575S7UIY9NHj7AUn9U/m7FNTXynkZ7Tu/8eW2UHM= Received: by 10.78.24.12 with SMTP id 12mr946765hux; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.33.6 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:48:20 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: freebsd In-Reply-To: <200605092234.53188.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200605092234.53188.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: make buildworld fails with CPUTYPE set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:55:18 -0000 On 5/9/06, RW wrote: > On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:21, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 5/9/06, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > CPUTYPE=3Dpentium3[m] > > > > I solved the problem by putting pentium3 instead of pentium3[m]. > > > > So why it's stated "pentium3[m]" in line 35 of > > /usr/src/share/examples/etc/make.conf ? > > [] is usually shorthand for an optional variant > > i.e. pentium3[m] means pentium3 or pentium3m Thanx Erick and RW. I knew the notation, but I didn't realize it was used there.... -- Pietro Cerutti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 22:12:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0C516A405 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EDC43D6E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:12:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdaRD-0007mj-Jv; Tue, 09 May 2006 23:12:22 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 23:12:13 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Frank Steinborn , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Mirroring GNATS locally - /usr/ports/databases/gnats marked as forbidden Thread-Index: AcZztZ+R3lvd0N+oEdq1nQAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <20060509140643.48633B83F@shodan.nognu.de> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Mirroring GNATS locally - /usr/ports/databases/gnats marked as forbidden X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 22:12:29 -0000 On 9/5/06 15:06, "Frank Steinborn" wrote: > Hello, > > I want to mirror the FreeBSD-GNATS db at home, as shown in the > Committers Guide. However, gnats in Ports is marked as forbidden. Can > I safely use GNATS4 instead? Is it compatible to GNATS3 databases? Nope. I just run a local copy with the setuid bit taken off. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 22:22:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A7816A4CC for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor.lundwall@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6497443D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:22:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victor.lundwall@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so1282692nfa for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 15:22:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kJTumNuUWtg8/OAwU81Jr9t0VFgjzIqkSOQZ0JcLKNi0N5ksA5JWpT3tRo6VGDyPEBHCUC1YGuKco0Eg5OdWrst08vrPqcA0DADOEUsIDWgRUZBRey8vTFca8eMQgQjOuZqKg7VTrJxm9di+bmQ4Gd5jTRbiJR655Byez+Ffoek= Received: by 10.48.238.8 with SMTP id l8mr2440611nfh; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.123.176? ( [81.231.6.76]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k23sm3003555nfc.2006.05.09.14.26.14; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <446108EF.2070904@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 23:26:07 +0200 From: Victor Lundwall User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060414) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Fred M." References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=95E040FC; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x95E040FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Copyrights X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 22:22:33 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fred M. wrote: > Hi, > > I'm from Belgium and I'm very interested in FreeBSD. I've planned to create a french website about it (commands, how-to's and so on...). > > I'd like to use the official (brand new) FreeBSD logo, or even Beastie, but I wonder if I can do it legally or not... > > Could you tell me more about it ? > > Thank you > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Beastie is copyrighted by Marshall Kirk McKusick so you probably want to contact him and ask for permission. And about the logo check out http://www.freebsd.org/logo.html Victor Lundwall -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEYQjGst+Hv5XgQPwRAhTGAKCm6vOF1z4UAgay32U/6mcS88XcfACaAkFo bgeOvHXSKHPbcHH2Hg3iQLU= =ho5o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 22:54:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C0C16A400 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:54:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dunc@lemonia.org) Received: from zest.lemonia.org (zest.lemonia.org [213.129.72.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532C043D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:54:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dunc@lemonia.org) Received: from ps2.jfk.braddon.org.uk ([84.92.193.244] helo=[192.168.1.148]) by zest.lemonia.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1Fdb84-000ORq-Qa for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 23:56:33 +0100 Message-ID: <44611D4B.6030708@lemonia.org> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 23:52:59 +0100 From: Dunc User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.92.193.244 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dunc@lemonia.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zest.lemonia.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.1.1 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zest.lemonia.org) Subject: dummynet on vlan parent interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 22:54:55 -0000 Hi, I am attempting to set up contended bandwidth of varying levels, using vlans and dummynet. I have 3 nics, one for each level of service, and am simply setting the parent interface of each vlan device to the correct nic for required level. I was then hoping to limit the whole real nic as a whole, to produce contention. Initially I tried:- pipe 300 ip from any to any in via ste0 pipe 1300 ip from any to any out via ste0 But saw no packets hitting these rules. After a read of the ipfw manpage i thought enabling the sysctl variable "net.link.ether.ipfw" might help, which did indeed get me hits in one direction, but I still get no hits in the outbound direction. I'm guessing this is something to do with where dummynet sits in the whole scheme of things, but basically just want to know if there is a way to do what I'm trying or am I going about this the wrong way? Cheers, Dunc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 23:05:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888F616A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maguswizardo@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E3943D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maguswizardo@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1543162nzi for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 16:05:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JtYT9IEwHT76ILQ2MAtbZtGajZ8yhNAuqnRVv5gxj3s8+i3lUS8LjHOj2LeKiYLkuTs8SFMB1JGn1USbnWundNp5RGy+eggvvRTaOHQ41wn8bcBKJSpUPON7+I/o30bBDP+ITcDaEDGvyHzUrKRiF11izdjnm3h964/GsW0uBcM= Received: by 10.36.252.65 with SMTP id z65mr5738969nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 16:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.132.5 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <76ebe6440605091605q5b83641cwb840df64b2ecbf8d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:05:27 +1000 From: "Lennon Cook" To: "Stephanie Bridges" In-Reply-To: <005801c6737c$a67bfbc0$0c20ba81@econ.iastate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <76ebe6440605081630g779cb751ubef4ea8137896e81@mail.gmail.com> <005801c6737c$a67bfbc0$0c20ba81@econ.iastate.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with cordless mouse/Keyboard combo set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 23:05:32 -0000 Stephanie Bridges wrote: > I'm not sure if you ever said, but are you on 6.0-RELEASE or something > newer? I upgraded to 6.1, which fixed a lot of other unrelated things fo= r > me. I said in my original message that I was on 6.0-STABLE, but this appears to have been inacurate (I was judging by the URLs printed by pkg_add -r ) - uname(1) reports that I'm on 6.1-BETA4. -- Lennon Victor Cook "He who receives an idea from me receives without lessening, as he who lights his candle at mine receives light without darkening" - Thomas Jefferson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 23:55:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF7216A405 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wbs@infowest.com) Received: from guadix.infowest.com (guadix.out.smtp.infowest.com [204.17.177.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC89D43D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:55:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wbs@infowest.com) Received: from marbella.infowest.com (marbella.client.smtp.infowest.com [204.17.177.60]) by guadix.infowest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEF3166DC9 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:55:47 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (71-213-95-210.slkc.qwest.net [71.213.95.210]) by marbella.infowest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B80A105F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:55:47 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <44612BFB.4080705@infowest.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:55:39 -0600 From: Lorin Lund User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Lock up during install on Compaq Presario notebook with Turion chip X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 23:55:48 -0000 I have tried installing 6.0-RELEASE for x64 and 6.1-RELEASE for i386. They both lock up. Below I have transcribed the information showing on the screen when it stops: I'm open to any suggestions/pointers. atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 acpi-acad0: on acpi0 battery0: on acpi0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcffff,0xd0000-0xd0fff,0xdc000-0xdffff,0xe0000-0xe3fff on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virttual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 8250 or not responding sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-ixbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1794786721 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 23:58:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF7B16A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.77.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C50843D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:58:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2006050923584701300ej9v1e>; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:58:48 +0000 Message-ID: <44612CB6.5000309@computer.org> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 18:58:46 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org References: <445EA144.3020506@computer.org> <44607B99.9010409@orchid.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <44607B99.9010409@orchid.homeunix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: DRI and linux compat... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 23:58:49 -0000 Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > On 08/05/2006 03:39, Eric Schuele wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to get a game running. The game in question is >> NeverWinterNights though I don't think the problem is related to the >> game specifically. The game does actually run. It is just that it is >> so unbelievably slow. >> >> It would appear as though I have no DRI within my linux-compat. DRI is >> working outside of linux-compat. I have been unable to find much on >> the web regarding this. Basically this is as far as I've gotten: >> >> [/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin] root# setenv LIBGL_DEBUG verbose >> [/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin] root# ./glxinfo >> libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 5.0.3 radeon (screen 0) >> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/radeon_dri.so >> drmOpenByBusid: busid is pci:0000:01:00.0 >> drmOpenDevice: minor is 0 >> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 >> drmOpenDevice: open result is 4, (OK) >> drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 4 >> drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:01:00.0 >> libGL error: >> DDX DRI driver expected Radeon version 4.0.x but got version 5.0.3 >> libGL error: InitDriver failed > [...] >> I'm guessing the my linux libGL does not like my radeon driver's >> version? Any way to fool it? (Since I'd rather not downgrade my radeon >> driver.) >> >> I am running 6.1-Something as of yesterday. I have never had this game >> working. Just installed it today. So its not like it stopped working >> at some point. > [...] >> Hardware is a Dell Inspiron 5100 2.6GHz. >> drm0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem >> 0xe8000000-0xefffffff,0xfcff0000-0xfcffffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci1 >> info: [drm] AGP at 0xe0000000 128MB >> info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.19.0 20050911 >> >> Any help is appreciated. > > Hi Eric, > > I asked about that @emulation some time ago. DRI under linux compat is > not working at the moment. Here's the original thread: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2006-April/001957.html Ok... Thanks for the info. hopefully something will turn up after the release. > > Since then I updated linux_base to fc-3_3, X libs to > linux-xorg-libs-6.8.2_1 but DRI is still not working (probably due to > outdated linux-dri but I'm not an expert). > > HTH, > > Karol > >> Regards, >> Eric > > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 00:03:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29F416A40F for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C86743D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:03:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1885916pya for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 17:03:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=aKjQ4b4JZRBbTz0ZDFy1j3rjyeSYL24LLDxL4czN3u1R3OSUEhQW/0kfHT+pc6OE/vcl0221B83zS2nshR4hccwgGHETXoyB6ED52224i0/5Nma2ubeJhkI1bk1F51lsgOiEPzF1lT2efaHhZnyIR5ajxdtkFytHlG0W1s3JiDA= Received: by 10.35.87.8 with SMTP id p8mr327697pyl; Tue, 09 May 2006 17:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.114.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0605091703x62580a4dsbd6416818ee79b7f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:03:02 -0500 From: Tuareg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Enable plugin nppdf.so in firefox? (also with Mozilla) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:03:06 -0000 Hello... I'm having this problem with Firefox 1.5.0.2 / Mozilla 1.7.13 I check that the links it's correct and also reinstalled linuxpluginwrapper and copied libmap.conf to /etc. But when I try to see a pdf file with both browsers launched from command line, I just get this message: bash2-2.05b$ firefox Usage: gv [OPTION]... [FILE] PostScript and PDF viewer. --monochrome display document using only black and white --grayscale display document without colors --color display document as usual --safer start ghostscript in safe mode --nosafer do not start ghostscript in safe mode --quiet start ghostscript with the -dQUIET option --noquiet do not start ghostscript with the -dQUIET option --arguments=3DARGS start ghostscript with additional options as specified by the string ARGS --page=3DLABEL display the page with label LABEL first --center the page should be centered automatically --nocenter the page should not be centered automatically --media=3DMEDIA selects the paper size to be used --orientation=3DORIENTATION sets the orientation of the page --scale=3DN selects the scale N --scalebase=3DN selects the scale base N --swap interchange the meaning of the orientations landscape and seascape --noswap do not interchange the meaning of the orientation landscape and seascape --antialias use antialiasing --noantialias do not use antialiasing --dsc dsc comments are respected --nodsc dsc comments are not respected --eof ignore the postscript EOF comment while scanning documents --noeof do not ignore the postscript EOF comment while scanning documents --pixmap use backing pixmap --nopixmap do not use backing pixmap --watch watch the document file for changes --nowatch do not watch the document file for changes --help print a help message and exit --usage print a usage message and exit --resize fit the size of the window to the size of the page --noresize do not fit the size of the window to the size of the page -geometry [][x][{+-}{+-}] --ad=3DFILE read and use additional resources from FILE --style=3DFILE read and use additional resources from FILE. These resources have lower priority than those provided on the context of --ad --spartan shortcut for --style=3Dgv_spartan.dat --version show gv version and exit And the browsers don't do anything else... I have reinstalled Mozilla and got the same result.... maybe need to reinstall linuxwrapper/plugger/mozilla/firefox in certain order to fix this= ? On 5/9/06, Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > > # cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > # make all install clean > # cp /usr/local/share/examples/linuxpluginwrapper/libmap.conf-FreeBSD6 > /etc/libmap.conf > > restart your firefox and open "about:plugins" url to see your installed > plugins > > > On 5/8/06, cblasius wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I've a problem with plugin to view PDF file in firefox. Could someone > > help me? > > > > Wehen I run firefox from command line I obtain this message: > > > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > > /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so > > [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined > > symbol "XtCalloc"] > > > > Best regards, > > cblasius > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 00:24:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAB116A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E90643D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:24:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip04.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.20]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IZ000FMMX5VMAZ0@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:25:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip04.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:24:53 -0300 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:23:58 -0300 From: Duane Whitty To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <4461329E.5030507@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060503) Subject: Understanding The FreeBSD Version Labels [RFC] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:24:54 -0000 Hi, I've written an article trying to explain the FreeBSD version labels, CURRENT, STABLE, and RELEASE. This article, of course, is aimed at newcomers to FreeBSD. The article is here http://www.dwlabs.ca/fbsd-releases For anyone who can time find to read it I would appreciate any comments, feedback. constructive criticism, etc. Thanks in advance, Duane Whitty -- duane@greenmeadow.ca or duane@dwlabs.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 01:00:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A2616A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE7743D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:00:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from localhost (terrapin.inter-sonic.com [172.16.1.12]) by neonpark.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308DF818E84 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:00:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44613B36.90508@intersonic.se> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 03:00:38 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: control rts/dtr from console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:00:49 -0000 Hi, I need to set cts/dtr of a serial line from the console. Tried http://www.gude.info/files/setserialbits.c.gz but nothing much seems to happen with that. I need to supply a clock from this port. I'm sure there are some simple solution to this. Anyone? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 01:54:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E2516A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from harman0@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD1B43D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:54:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from harman0@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1606375nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:54:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=T4Sz/W0MzUEBMa/Vzd2yKD0rmv3shqrLVk9lla/bg/leiDiPY9MDFQA3Jjcbj3VEvWwpRcelx6genjOJNFxAuti0a95mxl48/PWikrzOnBTFXnIFyZBfVit+ycH+6rXkOrLvub4qhg0UkgJpRF1hWUMP8sggVkZwdtCGz+2nzRg= Received: by 10.65.84.5 with SMTP id m5mr70288qbl; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:54:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.248.3 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:54:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:54:31 -0700 From: Harman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 errors with multiple libs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:54:33 -0000 I was installing beep-media-player yesterday through the ports collection. I was doing alot of manual upgrading of ports to get it done, never was able to get the entire thing working, because of dependencies. I noticed my things weren't able to execute, with the error: Most things execute without lib errors, all the X apps get this error. I'm thinking the base of the issue might be expat /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libexpat.so.5" not found requred by "libfontconfig.so.1" among some others like /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgobject-2.0.so.600" not found, required by "xchat" for xchat and freefontconfig /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgmodule-2.0.so.600" not found, required by "gaim" for gaim and mplayer You get the drift. Not sure how to easily fix this. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 02:04:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C3116A405 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD92C43D6B for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:04:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: (qmail 8086 invoked from network); 10 May 2006 02:04:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?75.7.236.228?) (jekillen@prodigy.net@75.7.236.228 with plain) by smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 02:04:17 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions From: jekillen Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:04:49 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Cc: Subject: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:04:19 -0000 Greetings: I just looked at the new FreeBSD logo and it's an interesting abstraction of the daemon motif of the old logo. Among other things, like running two installations of FreeBSD v6, one as a production server to host my web site and the other as a desktop and development server, I do fine art and graphics. The logo has an etherial feel to it (forgive the pun). But if someone new to FreeBSD sees the logo and hasn't seen the old logo, he or she might wonder what the cone shaped designs are sticking out of the glass like ball and what they are supposed to represent. So aesthetically it's engaging but too much of an abstraction of the theme. As far as psychology goes, Apple uses the apple with a bite out of it which has a dual significance. One that invokes the idea of giving an apple to the teacher and the other is the Biblical symbol of temptation and transgression. I think that that is why Apple doesn't have a bigger market share. The FreeBSD logo pushes a similar button. The icon of the adversary. I am not offended by the new or the old logo, accept that there seems to be too much of a trend toward cartoon character art. This, I presume is to appeal to the child in us all. But seriously when do we actually get to be grownups. I like FreeBSD. But I wouldn't but a logo sticker on my windshield. I have used Macs from the beginning and don't have a Mac logo sticker on anything, either. I have and use Linux systems and don't particularly care for the cute little penguin either. I have seen a more mature take on the penguin emblem that I was impressed with. It was used by a L.U.G. based in Maryland or thereabouts. I would like to see a mature logo for FreeBSD. Thanks all for being here; Jk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 02:18:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42CB16A402 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCC943D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:18:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so1294788wra for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:18:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fISzCwTNXJ4OiDu6v/rPT7TZteUcNi04r9xycWZRUSrvnrsIwJjmNDSJWS8x25bxt/QWs42+YZxCesLzxF9Is5eoTIIb3YziSIZjp1785Ibk9z5Rpk4lWX2IzrUHdBdcFIjkJEp7vfyGMjYD8JCV3D0ahGRo751n1dnfQpaHjIg= Received: by 10.54.69.20 with SMTP id r20mr314621wra; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.92.18 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:18:56 +0800 From: snnn To: Harman In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 errors with multiple libs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:18:58 -0000 Maybe the only way is re-compile these applications. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 02:23:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A9D16A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCA543D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:23:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from mail.dfwlp.com (localhost.int.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4A2N3cY008491 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:23:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from c-24-1-139-244.hsd1.tx.comcast.net ([24.1.139.244]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by mail.dfwlp.com with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:23:03 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <62840.24.1.139.244.1147227783.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> References: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:23:03 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:23:06 -0000 > Greetings: > I just looked at the new FreeBSD logo and it's an interesting > abstraction of the daemon motif of the old logo. > Among other things, like running two installations of FreeBSD v6, one > as a production server to host my web > site and the other as a desktop and development server, I do fine art > and graphics. The logo has an etherial > feel to it (forgive the pun). But if someone new to FreeBSD sees the > logo and hasn't seen the old logo, he > or she might wonder what the cone shaped designs are sticking out of > the glass like ball and what they are > supposed to represent. So aesthetically it's engaging but too much of > an abstraction of the theme. > As far as psychology goes, Apple uses the apple with a bite out of it > which has a dual significance. One that > invokes the idea of giving an apple to the teacher and the other is the > Biblical symbol of temptation and transgression. > I think that that is why Apple doesn't have a bigger market share. The > FreeBSD logo pushes a similar button. > The icon of the adversary. I am not offended by the new or the old > logo, accept that there seems to be too much > of a trend toward cartoon character art. This, I presume is to appeal > to the child in us all. But seriously when do we > actually get to be grownups. > I like FreeBSD. But I wouldn't but a logo sticker on my windshield. I > have used Macs from the beginning and don't > have a Mac logo sticker on anything, either. I have and use Linux > systems and don't particularly care for the cute > little penguin either. I have seen a more mature take on the penguin > emblem that I was impressed with. > It was used by a L.U.G. based in Maryland or thereabouts. I would like > to see a mature logo for FreeBSD. > Thanks all for being here; > Jk > i dont mind saying that i think i must be about the only one who likes the new art. i think its very modern looking, crisp and abreviated, un-childish, but at the same time not too serious or ominous. ive actually thought about printing out some examples of both versions, carrying it down to our artists in our print studio, and "taste testing" them with professional artists who couldnt give one care about anything technical. *shrug* would be an interesting experiment, to say the least. jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 02:25:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B39316A44A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CFF43D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:25:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-102-190.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.102.190]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 May 2006 22:26:02 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,107,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="201074564:sNHT2725762824" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17505.20001.167505.469326@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:21:21 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta26) "endive" XEmacs Lucid Subject: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 errors with multiple libs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:25:26 -0000 Harman writes: > I was installing beep-media-player yesterday through the ports > collection. I was doing alot of manual upgrading of ports to get it > done, never was able to get the entire thing working, because of > dependencies. I noticed my things weren't able to execute, with the > error: Most things execute without lib errors, all the X apps get this > error. I'm thinking the base of the issue might be expat > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libexpat.so.5" not found requred > by "libfontconfig.so.1" This feels like a version mis-match. Can you re-install textproc/expat2? > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgmodule-2.0.so.600" not found, > required by "gaim" > for gaim and mplayer May be a GNOME problem. Have you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 02:28:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6036B16A407 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C56443D58 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:28:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so174406ugf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:28:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qc9Gzsp8G5jiPxLCFsR6sVosnpKo7O8UHSEylcAJyGLTzi3XwTcIZB950RXGYv9RtXHwmL5wLjVak00dQeOQcEisJfOU3Q68iC7as0MtfeP/xpDg2g+i1Jx6UCfeglVFesIdoeYCXZwGlL1qP1rnWjk2FWREYABHO87VCbKS0BI= Received: by 10.78.31.18 with SMTP id e18mr26533hue; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.31.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:21:59 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Lorin Lund" In-Reply-To: <44612BFB.4080705@infowest.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44612BFB.4080705@infowest.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lock up during install on Compaq Presario notebook with Turion chip X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:28:54 -0000 On 5/9/06, Lorin Lund wrote: > I have tried installing 6.0-RELEASE for x64 and 6.1-RELEASE for i386. > They both > lock up. Below I have transcribed the information showing on the screen > when it stops: > > I'm open to any suggestions/pointers. > > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 > acpi-acad0: on acpi0 > battery0: on acpi0 > pmtimer0 on isa0 > orm0: at iomem > 0xc0000-0xcffff,0xd0000-0xd0fff,0xdc000-0xdffff,0xe0000-0xe3fff on isa0 > ppc0: parallel port not found. > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virttual consoles, flags=3D0x300> > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio0: port may not be enabled > sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > sio0: type 8250 or not responding > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-ixbffff on isa0 > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1794786721 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > > Disable ACPI -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 03:12:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0784116A432 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:12:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646C743D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:12:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id h2so105579ugf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 20:12:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dgVbmZnMX67rhRcIVoyWVjFG/UwBEjVNqj/njsDa966NI/3I2l2LIqhroSH5IsKEQ/73q4rwG+iBP+L5BVZD59QGoy+NGi9GkkAu7hS/0zsizJjJAboTOvy5OqdxdsAfgF8t9jf4h04vlMTph8hHI6qnISKIWHZhIKxpQG6vkTg= Received: by 10.78.40.10 with SMTP id n10mr26147hun; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:17:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.31.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:17:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:22 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Duane Whitty" In-Reply-To: <4461329E.5030507@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4461329E.5030507@greenmeadow.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Understanding The FreeBSD Version Labels [RFC] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 03:12:20 -0000 On 5/9/06, Duane Whitty wrote: > Hi, > > I've written an article trying to explain the FreeBSD version labels, > CURRENT, STABLE, and RELEASE. This article, of course, is > aimed at newcomers to FreeBSD. > > The article is here > http://www.dwlabs.ca/fbsd-releases > > For anyone who can time find to read it I would appreciate any > comments, feedback. constructive criticism, etc. > "Branch tag for FreeBSD 6.0 RELENG_6_0 So, FreeBSD 6.0 was officially released. At the time this happened it was decided, after a lot of testing and other quality control procedures, that the code in 6-STABLE should be turned into a release. But since FreeBSD is a very complex piece of software it is inevitable that eventually a security issue would need to be addressed or some other critical issue would need to be fixed. That is what this branch of development is for. It used as the spot in the source archive for only critical fixes and items which address security issues. This model ensures that officially released FreeBSD versions contain only the most reliable of code while still having bugs and security issues fixed." What about errata fix branches, they are not limited to just critical and security fixes? Also update the doc, change 6.0 to 6.1. -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 03:25:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319CB16A4DE for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:25:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: from mail.cruzinternet.com (mail.cruzinternet.com [216.234.167.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B16F43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:25:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: (qmail 86614 invoked from network); 10 May 2006 03:25:52 -0000 Received: from iphost-216-234-182-9.cruzinternet.com (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (216.234.182.9) by mail.cruzinternet.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 03:25:52 -0000 Message-ID: <44615D40.9090708@cruzinternet.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:25:52 -0600 From: Jeff Molofee User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060506) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060509200553.B969016A64D@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060509200553.B969016A64D@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Random Pixels At The Top Of The Screen... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 03:25:59 -0000 I'm not sure if anyone would find this information useful, but I had asked if anyone knew why I was seeing about 10-20 lines of random pixels at the top of my screen any time I enabled cups, or webmin in rc.conf. After months of trying to figure out the problem, I found the cause. In my machine I had an ATI TV Wonder Pro (crap) capture card. After removing this card from my machine, the problem went away. I'm not sure why the card caused this problem, but now that the card is out, everything is fine. Thanks to those of you that emailed in an attempt to help me resolve the issue. Hopefully if anyone else experiences this issue, this post helps. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 03:50:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628DE16A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from draculawizard@earthlink.net) Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C175C43D5C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:50:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from draculawizard@earthlink.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=I5hKpMMKzBpncDlY/BxIPGCetFSvnITNwDBecZdtWHXRuGDqVDSe6Tb8yF2AivXB; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.86.224.37] (helo=elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FdfiY-0002u0-Un for questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 23:50:31 -0400 Received: from 71.3.78.129 by webmail.pas.earthlink.net with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:50:30 -0400 Message-ID: <1902670.1147233030936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:50:30 -0400 (GMT-04:00) From: paul To: questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0 X-ELNK-Trace: a1fd23fe4da63c5acf07ca80b5d5531a74bf435c0eb9d478caeb9b520bd3b7442083d0725846f431c1c62ce68b2370c3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.86.224.37 Cc: Subject: question about putty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: paul List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 03:50:34 -0000 i have a question about putty after i log in to my putty.exe and i want to go add oper but after when i login with my password and login name what do i need to type after please emailed me back thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 03:51:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9C916A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lordsporkton@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA18443D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:51:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lordsporkton@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1623216nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 20:51:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FiDcva31IZaiDurcgFfYXBmH/yiIeFQ7NCFzQxlimK60Ipm8EXJTwTdJD+9yl7gi96aqafNxLN0Jg1cz4X7K+fSymEegdxjBXoaknOETDQRaRPU1JeoZ2wBlJL6wmtvRtYAjiydFTZYjNVN1YXBdbmkmuERncy5tckGQ4QHHHbA= Received: by 10.65.74.4 with SMTP id b4mr110990qbl; Tue, 09 May 2006 20:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.15.5 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 20:51:21 -0700 From: "Lawrence Horvath" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <62840.24.1.139.244.1147227783.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> <62840.24.1.139.244.1147227783.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 03:51:22 -0000 On 5/9/06, Jonathan Horne wrote: > > Greetings: > > I just looked at the new FreeBSD logo and it's an interesting > > abstraction of the daemon motif of the old logo. > > Among other things, like running two installations of FreeBSD v6, one > > as a production server to host my web > > site and the other as a desktop and development server, I do fine art > > and graphics. The logo has an etherial > > feel to it (forgive the pun). But if someone new to FreeBSD sees the > > logo and hasn't seen the old logo, he > > or she might wonder what the cone shaped designs are sticking out of > > the glass like ball and what they are > > supposed to represent. So aesthetically it's engaging but too much of > > an abstraction of the theme. > > As far as psychology goes, Apple uses the apple with a bite out of it > > which has a dual significance. One that > > invokes the idea of giving an apple to the teacher and the other is the > > Biblical symbol of temptation and transgression. > > I think that that is why Apple doesn't have a bigger market share. The > > FreeBSD logo pushes a similar button. > > The icon of the adversary. I am not offended by the new or the old > > logo, accept that there seems to be too much > > of a trend toward cartoon character art. This, I presume is to appeal > > to the child in us all. But seriously when do we > > actually get to be grownups. > > I like FreeBSD. But I wouldn't but a logo sticker on my windshield. I > > have used Macs from the beginning and don't > > have a Mac logo sticker on anything, either. I have and use Linux > > systems and don't particularly care for the cute > > little penguin either. I have seen a more mature take on the penguin > > emblem that I was impressed with. > > It was used by a L.U.G. based in Maryland or thereabouts. I would like > > to see a mature logo for FreeBSD. > > Thanks all for being here; > > Jk > > > > i dont mind saying that i think i must be about the only one who likes th= e > new art. i think its very modern looking, crisp and abreviated, > un-childish, but at the same time not too serious or ominous. > > ive actually thought about printing out some examples of both versions, > carrying it down to our artists in our print studio, and "taste testing" > them with professional artists who couldnt give one care about anything > technical. *shrug* would be an interesting experiment, to say the least. > > jonathan > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > I quite like the new logo, i think the new one is far more professional then the old one, though i liked them both. -- -Lawrence From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 04:03:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CF216A403 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 04:03:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc3910@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F0243D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 04:03:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc3910@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1927941pya for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:03:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=nPBZZiJO2HruYOJMtz7l/C4n5nMAr+ITplUvEmf5NEfFhFG4PVavUJkSnxFPkn2eKO830Mkwio5MdP4Z7ELyWdlLD7QILIXx7OkLP48SL+KcIIAxnPcwqp83bXCIGJTctZbGSEE8TV4VaLEJxTZX2/6+BXbJ2I4R4qwxenFb+1s= Received: by 10.35.88.17 with SMTP id q17mr2514236pyl; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.12.14 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51257d370605092103t4c4bf3b1gd80e9dda9373a2c0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:03:47 -0600 From: bc To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: 6.1_RELEASE Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:03:48 -0000 After make installworld I ran the final run thru of mergemaster and recived this error: ERROR CODE 64 FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'dc' into /usr/src/etc/ and install files to the temproot environment. Cant say how far it got before this error but it looked like iwas going along pretty good. Upon reboot there were at least one system files missing, like hosts. I'm not sure if ither files failed as well. I chmod 777 on that directory but did not help. Also noticed samab did not start from rc.conf although it loads and runs from the prompt. But these ar= e just symptoms of the error I hope. Should I be concerned about this? How to fix and move on? -- -- Bc bc3910 'at' gmail 'dot' com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 05:06:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CC716A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7BB43D49 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:06:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4A56BAS040842; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:06:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <446174BD.2040606@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:06:05 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paul References: <1902670.1147233030936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <1902670.1147233030936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about putty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 05:06:18 -0000 paul wrote: > i have a question about putty after i log in to my > putty.exe and i want to go add oper but after > when i login with my password and login name > what do i need to type after please emailed me back thanks Well, if I'm understanding you correctly, you should type "adduser". But, from the sound of it, it wouldn't hurt to try most of all of the following as well: # man adduser # man tcsh # man builtin # man man # man hier # man ls # man more HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- If Love Were Oil, I'd Be About A Quart Low -- Book title by Lewis Grizzard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 05:34:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00C416A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:34:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A6643D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-242.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.242]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DC64C9E0; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:46:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249DF52859; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:34:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44617B7C.8030008@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:34:52 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lawrence Horvath References: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> <62840.24.1.139.244.1147227783.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 05:34:49 -0000 Lawrence Horvath schrieb: > I quite like the new logo, i think the new one is far more > professional then the old one, though i liked them both. I would say that there isn't an old one. Beastie is a little bit older than FreeBSD and I would understand it as mascot, not as a logo. So the new logo is not a replacement, but rather something that is missing for many years; and Beastie is still alive. Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 05:35:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73BE16A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AA543D49 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:35:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip03.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.15]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IZ1005S0BH922C1@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:34:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip03.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:35:02 -0300 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:34:08 -0300 From: Duane Whitty In-reply-to: To: Nikolas Britton Message-id: <44617B50.1060301@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= References: <4461329E.5030507@greenmeadow.ca> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060503) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Understanding The FreeBSD Version Labels [RFC] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 05:35:03 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 5/9/06, Duane Whitty wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've written an article trying to explain the FreeBSD version labels, >> CURRENT, STABLE, and RELEASE. This article, of course, is >> aimed at newcomers to FreeBSD. >> >> The article is here >> http://www.dwlabs.ca/fbsd-releases >> >> For anyone who can time find to read it I would appreciate any >> comments, feedback. constructive criticism, etc. >> > > "Branch tag for FreeBSD 6.0 > RELENG_6_0 > So, FreeBSD 6.0 was officially released. At the time this happened it > was decided, after > a lot of testing and other quality control procedures, that the code > in 6-STABLE should > be turned into a release. But since FreeBSD is a very complex piece > of software it is > inevitable that eventually a security issue would need to be addressed > or some other > critical issue would need to be fixed. That is what this branch of > development is for. > It used as the spot in the source archive for only critical fixes and > items which address > security issues. This model ensures that officially released FreeBSD > versions contain > only the most reliable of code while still having bugs and security > issues fixed." > > What about errata fix branches, they are not limited to just critical > and security fixes? > > Also update the doc, change 6.0 to 6.1. > > > > > -- > BSD Podcasts @: > http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ > http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Hi Nikolas, Thanks for all the feedback and for taking the time to do so. I have made extensive changes to this article. For any interested parties it can still be viewed at http://www.dwlabs.ca/fbsd-releases Sincerely, Duane Whitty -- duane@greenmeadow.ca or duane@dwlabs.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 05:58:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD68E16A436 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEC043D49 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:58:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1Fdhhw-000LKd-4K for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 23:58:00 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) In-Reply-To: <44617B7C.8030008@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> <62840.24.1.139.244.1147227783.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> <44617B7C.8030008@cs.tu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9DF2732A-2B19-4DE5-8FBB-5AAA793D3134@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:57:59 -0600 To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 05:58:02 -0000 On May 9, 2006, at 11:34 PM, Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > Lawrence Horvath schrieb: > >> I quite like the new logo, i think the new one is far more >> professional then the old one, though i liked them both. > > I would say that there isn't an old one. Beastie is a little bit =20 > older than FreeBSD and I would understand it as mascot, not as a =20 > logo. So the new logo is not a replacement, but rather something =20 > that is missing for many years; and Beastie is still alive. And doesn't beastie represent the complete *BSD family, not just =20 FreeBSD? Wondering Chad > > Regards > Bj=F6rn > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-=20 > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 05:59:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5376A16A408 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org) Received: from pd4mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6F443D49 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:59:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org) Received: from pd5mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.182]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ100IT4CNL6TE0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 23:59:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml9so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.7]) by pd5mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ100FJKCNLJ110@pd5mr6so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 23:59:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from soralx.cydem.org ([24.87.27.3]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ1006D9CNKDT60@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 23:59:45 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 22:59:44 -0700 From: soralx@cydem.org In-reply-to: <20060509185927.GB5327@osiris.chen.org.nz> To: jonc@chen.org.nz, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200605092259.44504.soralx@cydem.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200605090416.24346.soralx@cydem.org> <200605090441.57320.soralx@cydem.org> <20060509185927.GB5327@osiris.chen.org.nz> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Subject: Re: linker wiredness? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 05:59:57 -0000 > > > FreeBSD's linker doesn't add /usr/local/lib to the search path by > > > default, unlike some other operating systems. The "-L/usr/local/lib" > > > flag is therefore required... > > > > but ldconfig already found the library (line 441)!? > > ld(1) doesn't consult ldconfig(8). oh, I was probably confused by the `man ldconfig`: "The ldconfig utility is used to prepare a set of ``hints'' for use by the dynamic linker to facilitate quick lookup of shared libraries available [...]" The 'dynamic linker' doesn't mean 'compiler's linker' here, I suppose. In any case, how do I tell ld(1) where to look without specifying '-L' or modifying Makefie? I tried `export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/local/lib"` and `echo "/usr/local/lib" > /etc/ld.so.conf`, but nothing changed. Timestamp: 0x44617F2B [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 06:13:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E1D16A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5699343D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:13:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-242.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.242]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1ADD4CAAE; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:25:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EBE52859; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:12:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4461849E.2090107@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:13:50 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" References: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> <62840.24.1.139.244.1147227783.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> <44617B7C.8030008@cs.tu-berlin.de> <9DF2732A-2B19-4DE5-8FBB-5AAA793D3134@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <9DF2732A-2B19-4DE5-8FBB-5AAA793D3134@shire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 06:13:48 -0000 Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC schrieb: > And doesn't beastie represent the complete *BSD family, not just FreeBSD? I think so. Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 07:25:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4E616A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE0643D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:25:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4A7PeEY010867; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:25:40 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:22:15 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <000a01c67362$f3d1f3d0$01010101@avalon.lan> <200605091622.30492.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <20060509141318.88A0FB822@shodan.nognu.de> In-Reply-To: <20060509141318.88A0FB822@shodan.nognu.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605101022.16121.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: nospam@mgedv.net, Frank Steinborn Subject: Re: kern.randompid: jot generation senseful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:25:44 -0000 On Tuesday 09 May 2006 17:13, Frank Steinborn wrote: > Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > Isn't kern.randompid a boolean? TRUE or FALSE? > > No. > > > It is just on or off. 1 means PIDs are random. > > 0 means PIDs are sequential. to be exact, everything > > not being 0, is TRUE. > > That is not true. Peter Pentchev once wrote: > > "The kern.randompid sysctl is not a boolean flag, but an estimate of > the random value that will be added to each newly created pid. For > more information, read the comments in src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c before > the sysctl_kern_randompid() function (around line 150). The function > itself ignores sysctl settings of less than 2." > Excuse my ignorance. It was an unlucky guess... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:08:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C704816A403 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx2.go2.pl [193.17.41.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646D543D5A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:08:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from [84.40.169.29] (xdsl-5405.zgora.dialog.net.pl [84.40.169.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A477A7480EC for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44619F69.4000208@o2.pl> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:08:09 +0200 From: cblasius User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Enable plugin nppdf.so in firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:08:09 -0000 >> Alexandre Biancalana wrote: >> >> # cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper >> >> # make all install clean >> >> # cp /usr/local/share/examples/linuxpluginwrapper/libmap.conf-FreeBSD6 >> >> /etc/libmap.conf >> >> >> >> restart your firefox and open "about:plugins" url to see your installed >> >> plugins I menaged to do it. Next I run firefox and go Edit -> Preferences -> Downloads -> View & Edit Actions... and then I obtain this message (worse than previous): [john@machina ~]$ firefox LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/ intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined symbol "XtCalloc"] LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/ plugins/nphelix.so [Shared object "libm.so.6" not found, required by "nphelix.so"] LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/X11R6/Adobe/ Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/ Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined symbol "XtCalloc"] LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /home/john/.mozilla/ plugins/nppdf.so [/home/john/.mozilla/plugins/nppdf.so: Undefined symbol "XtCalloc"] LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/ Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined symbol "XtCalloc"] I also obtain this message when type in firefox: about:plugins I need your help. Best regards, cblasius From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:09:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDFC16A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx2.go2.pl [193.17.41.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D6E43D7F for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:09:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cblasius@o2.pl) Received: from [84.40.169.29] (xdsl-5405.zgora.dialog.net.pl [84.40.169.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9516A7480EE for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44619FCA.3040204@o2.pl> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:09:46 +0200 From: cblasius User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Enable plugin nppdf.so in firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:09:49 -0000 >> >> Kevin G. Eliuk wrote: >> >> Verify the symbolic link for >> >> /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so >> >> >> >> it should be >> >> -> /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so The symbolic link is OK. Best regards, cblasius PS. I'm sorry for my messages, but I have also problem with my e-mail. I send my messages to list 'freebsd-questions', but I haven't respond from this list to my e-mail. So I go: http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/current/freebsd-questions.html and read the answer. Then I write my answers and send them. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:18:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F2016A409 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E6343D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:18:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4A8IGx63093; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:18:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Jonathan Horne" , Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:18:16 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-Reply-To: <62840.24.1.139.244.1147227783.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:18:20 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jonathan Horne >Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:23 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > >i dont mind saying that i think i must be about the only one >who likes the >new art. i think its very modern looking, crisp and abreviated, >un-childish, but at the same time not too serious or ominous. > >ive actually thought about printing out some examples of both versions, >carrying it down to our artists in our print studio, and "taste testing" >them with professional artists who couldnt give one care about anything >technical. *shrug* would be an interesting experiment, to say >the least. > Someone already posted a professional analysis. The summary was that the new logo was amateurish with some serious flaws. Amateurish because a ball is about the easiest thing you can produce in Photoshop and very unoriginal. Serious flaws because due to all the shading this logo is impossible to accurately reproduce on small items like business cards, and on larger items the shading makes it very expensive to reproduce due to the number of colors used. At the end of the day you need to ask yourself, will having this logo help FreeBSD to sell more copies? That's the litmus test that is used for logos - after all if it does not help market penetration, it's a big waste of time. The problem here is that FreeBSD is noncommercial so the question is rather a moot issue. In short, the Project needed a new logo like a boar needs teats. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:25:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1124A16A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8216643D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:25:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4A8P5x63145; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:25:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: =?iso-8859-1?B?Qmr2cm4gS/ZuaWc=?= Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:25:05 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-Reply-To: <44617B7C.8030008@cs.tu-berlin.de> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:25:20 -0000 He became a mascot only after the 'new-logo' people started agitating for the sex-ball. Prior to that all the literature referred to him as a logo, when the word logo was used. (which wasn't often, but it was used) This is nothing more than an argument of appeasement and has been explained before in this forum, please quit insulting our intelligence. We all know that Beastie's place as the logo has been supplanted, and your side won, and your crude attempt to explain away Beastie is insulting. You won, be content with that. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Björn König >Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:35 PM >To: Lawrence Horvath >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > >Lawrence Horvath schrieb: > >> I quite like the new logo, i think the new one is far more >> professional then the old one, though i liked them both. > >I would say that there isn't an old one. Beastie is a little bit older >than FreeBSD and I would understand it as mascot, not as a logo. So the >new logo is not a replacement, but rather something that is missing for >many years; and Beastie is still alive. > >Regards > Björn >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/334 - Release Date: 5/8/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:30:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD8616A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:30:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E936143D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:30:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1Fdk5d-0001ZA-Tb; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:30:38 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:30:37 -0600 To: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:30:39 -0000 On May 10, 2006, at 2:25 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > He became a mascot only after the 'new-logo' people > started agitating for the sex-ball. Prior to that all the > literature referred to him as a logo, when the word logo was > used. (which wasn't often, but it was used) > > This is nothing more than an argument of appeasement and > has been explained before in this forum, please quit insulting > our intelligence. We all know that Beastie's place as the > logo has been supplanted, and your side won, and your crude > attempt to explain away Beastie is insulting. You won, be > content with that. > Wow, Ted a top-poster! A professional evaluation of "beastie" showed he was not a logo and =20 had served as a poor-one at that in his ersatz role as a wanna-be =20 logo. (Note that I did not say that Beastie was poor but that he =20 had served as a poor logo based on professional criteria of what =20 makes a good logo). Beastie has his place. Chad > Ted > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bj=F6rn = K=F6nig >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:35 PM >> To: Lawrence Horvath >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo >> >> >> Lawrence Horvath schrieb: >> >>> I quite like the new logo, i think the new one is far more >>> professional then the old one, though i liked them both. >> >> I would say that there isn't an old one. Beastie is a little bit =20 >> older >> than FreeBSD and I would understand it as mascot, not as a logo. =20 >> So the >> new logo is not a replacement, but rather something that is =20 >> missing for >> many years; and Beastie is still alive. >> >> Regards >> Bj=F6rn >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/334 - Release Date: =20 >> 5/8/2006 >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-=20 > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:33:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2993216A405 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:33:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from pinnacle.akherb.com (60-105-237-24.gci.net [24.237.105.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC11E43D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 0AB725D45; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:33:32 -0800 (AKDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pinnacle.akherb.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 Received: from [192.168.241.106] (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31FE5D09; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:33:30 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:33:11 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart18523549.mrk3THELta"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605100033.28581.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Jonathan Horne , Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:33:33 -0000 --nextPart18523549.mrk3THELta Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 10 May 2006 00:18, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jonathan Horne > >Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:23 PM > >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > > > > >i dont mind saying that i think i must be about the only one > >who likes the > >new art. i think its very modern looking, crisp and abreviated, > >un-childish, but at the same time not too serious or ominous. > > > >ive actually thought about printing out some examples of both versions, > >carrying it down to our artists in our print studio, and "taste testing" > >them with professional artists who couldnt give one care about anything > >technical. *shrug* would be an interesting experiment, to say > >the least. > > Someone already posted a professional analysis. The summary was that > the new logo was amateurish with some serious flaws. Amateurish because > a ball is about the easiest thing you can produce in Photoshop and very > unoriginal. Serious flaws because due to all the shading this logo is > impossible to accurately reproduce on small items like business cards, > and on larger items the shading makes it very expensive to reproduce due > to the number of colors used. > > At the end of the day you need to ask yourself, will having this logo > help FreeBSD to sell more copies? That's the litmus test that is used > for logos - after all if it does not help market penetration, it's a big > waste of time. The problem here is that FreeBSD is noncommercial so the > question is rather a moot issue. In short, the Project needed a new logo > like a boar needs teats. > > Ted To me it looks like something that would be associated with an inexpensive= =20 kids toy company, not a professional OS. Just my $.02 Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart18523549.mrk3THELta Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEYaVYp5D0B1NlT4URAl1hAJ9nkCWJY6cL9x9U0UiRRLbR4cSMqACfRseD doyLezhNa630MENYtbL2zgk= =7aac -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart18523549.mrk3THELta-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:33:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B3C16A42A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D4B43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:33:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so28175uge for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:33:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qEQNXZ/t5uwE/0usImKu0iRL1/N3LyrllxxzN+e+EK/fWb/N5+kouY9s3cMPJMFXDg3Zucu2Wktfg77nwiIun7lq4P8MDg9EwtLY26RzhX7KbHSZpLuZqLMCqILy/j/vPYdfBmTuaVG1oeY4sx+o2ZAornhhbaTJdj25Ml9EI2I= Received: by 10.78.40.10 with SMTP id n10mr78062hun; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605100133p58f81d28w5d30a8089304dbce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:33:43 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:33:45 -0000 On 5/9/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > > On May 9, 2006, at 5:53 AM, Michael Grant wrote: > > > > > When it comes time to upgrade, how does one upgrade 100 different > > jails? This will be a nightmare! > > Actually, not. You only need 1 master jail and a bunch of nullfs > read only mounts plus some exclusive space for each jail. I run 44 > jails at the moment this way. Upgrading is relatively easy as I only > have to upgrade one master jail (and unfortunately lots of jail etc > if such happens but a few scripts can automate much of that). > > I basically set up > > /local/jails/master and install according to man jail into this > place. I never start this jail. > > I happen to use disk backed md devices as the root for each jail. I > mount each on on /local/jail/ > > Then I do > > /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/bin /local/jails/adcmw/bin > /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/lib /local/jails/adcmw/lib > /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/libexec /local/jails/ > adcmw/libexec > /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/sbin /local/jails/adcmw/ > sbin > /sbin/mount_nullfs -o ro /local/jails/master/usr /local/jails/adcmw/usr > /sbin/mount -t procfs proc /local/jails/adcmw/proc > devfs_domount /local/jails/adcmw/dev devfsrules_jail > devfs_set_ruleset devfsrules_jail /local/jails/adcmw/dev > /sbin/devfs -m /local/jails/adcmw/dev rule -s 4 applyset > > In my master jail I have some symlinks so that each jail has its own / > usr/local/ that is writable. > > All the jails run out of one installed jail and they also have the > side benefit of the main system directories being read only so > exploits in one jail cannot affect all the running jails. Wow, I really like the setup you have make.. One question.How do you update the system(and the jail) ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:41:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1F116A405 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from pinnacle.akherb.com (60-105-237-24.gci.net [24.237.105.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADF643D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:41:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 1B4ED5D45; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:41:26 -0800 (AKDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pinnacle.akherb.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 Received: from [192.168.241.106] (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC795D09; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:41:24 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:41:20 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart35871094.i0l2SXKnbA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605100041.23001.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt , "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:41:27 -0000 --nextPart35871094.i0l2SXKnbA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 10 May 2006 00:30, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > On May 10, 2006, at 2:25 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > He became a mascot only after the 'new-logo' people > > started agitating for the sex-ball. Prior to that all the > > literature referred to him as a logo, when the word logo was > > used. (which wasn't often, but it was used) > > > > This is nothing more than an argument of appeasement and > > has been explained before in this forum, please quit insulting > > our intelligence. We all know that Beastie's place as the > > logo has been supplanted, and your side won, and your crude > > attempt to explain away Beastie is insulting. You won, be > > content with that. > > Wow, Ted a top-poster! > > A professional evaluation of "beastie" showed he was not a logo and > had served as a poor-one at that in his ersatz role as a wanna-be > logo. (Note that I did not say that Beastie was poor but that he > had served as a poor logo based on professional criteria of what > makes a good logo). Beastie has his place. > > Chad That's all well and good, but I for one don't plan to replace the "powered = by"=20 beastie logo on any of my sites with that sex-toy. It would be interesting = to=20 see how many webmasters agree with me. Beech > > > Ted > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bj=F6rn K=F6n= ig > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:35 PM > >> To: Lawrence Horvath > >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > >> > >> Lawrence Horvath schrieb: > >>> I quite like the new logo, i think the new one is far more > >>> professional then the old one, though i liked them both. > >> > >> I would say that there isn't an old one. Beastie is a little bit > >> older > >> than FreeBSD and I would understand it as mascot, not as a logo. > >> So the > >> new logo is not a replacement, but rather something that is > >> missing for > >> many years; and Beastie is still alive. > >> > >> Regards > >> Bj=F6rn > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> -- > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >> Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/334 - Release Date: > >> 5/8/2006 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > --- > Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC > Your Web App and Email hosting provider > chad at shire.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart35871094.i0l2SXKnbA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEYacyp5D0B1NlT4URAmNyAKCGdOLmdUNEmqXJLsqhcrguBLyjNACeIFRj KEy8McgJcOUdCxAmaM4zzYo= =zyxf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart35871094.i0l2SXKnbA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:51:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C1316A403 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C015443D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:51:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4A8ppx63317; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:51:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , "FreeBSD Questions Mailing List" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:51:51 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-Reply-To: <9DF2732A-2B19-4DE5-8FBB-5AAA793D3134@shire.net> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:51:55 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Chad Leigh -- >Shire.Net LLC >Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:58 PM >To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > > >On May 9, 2006, at 11:34 PM, Björn König wrote: > >> Lawrence Horvath schrieb: >> >>> I quite like the new logo, i think the new one is far more >>> professional then the old one, though i liked them both. >> >> I would say that there isn't an old one. Beastie is a little bit >> older than FreeBSD and I would understand it as mascot, not as a >> logo. So the new logo is not a replacement, but rather something >> that is missing for many years; and Beastie is still alive. > >And doesn't beastie represent the complete *BSD family, not just >FreeBSD? > No, the original BSD representation (http://www.mckusick.com/beastie/jpg/foglio.jpg) included many devils, not looking at all like Beastie. The famous "classic" artwork that most of the successive representations have been based on was the 4.3BSD daemon drawn by John Lasseter. It also didn't hurt that John went on to do Toy Story and so on. Many BSD variants have used variations of the Lasseter artwork simply because it was such a good image, it captured the essense of BSD at the time - bursting onto the scene yet still fragile and young. But not all BSD variants used and use Beastie. BSDI only used him a few times, OpenBSD uses the blowfish, not Beastie, NetBSD uses the flag. Although, both NetBSD and OpenBSD have used modified Beastie images in the past. The sad truth is that FreeBSD has really gone way downhill in the logo department. We traded in a logo drawn by a true professional who is one of the famous great graphic artists of our time, for a amateur ping-pong ball drawn by a nobody in a nickel and dime contest. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 08:57:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F4F16A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485A543D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:57:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4A8vQx63345; Wed, 10 May 2006 01:57:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:57:26 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:57:28 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [mailto:chad@shire.net] >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:31 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > >Wow, Ted a top-poster! Why not, no point making everyone reread the entire argument all over again, I'm sure most people on the list have seen it an enormous number of times already. > >A professional evaluation of "beastie" showed he was not a logo and >had served as a poor-one at that in his ersatz role as a wanna-be >logo. (Note that I did not say that Beastie was poor but that he >had served as a poor logo based on professional criteria of what >makes a good logo). So, we traded in Beastie, a difficult and expensive to print logo that lost most resolution when shrunk down, for a difficult and expensive to print logo that loses most resolution when shrunk down. Ah, this is progress. Kind of like the automobile companies do, when they replace last years difficult and expensive to service model because everything is jammed into a too small engine bay, with this years difficult and expensive to service model because everything is jammed into a too small engine bay. I got it now! Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 09:05:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4514F16A40F for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:05:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B976743D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:05:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4A95dx63811; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:05:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Beech Rintoul" , Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:05:39 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-Reply-To: <200605100041.23001.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:05:42 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:beech@alaskaparadise.com] >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:41 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Cc: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC; Ted Mittelstaedt >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > >That's all well and good, but I for one don't plan to replace >the "powered by" >beastie logo on any of my sites with that sex-toy. It would be >interesting to >see how many webmasters agree with me. > Webmasters have it easy, you get plenty of resolution on the Web and as many colors as you want for free, and you can print as many copies as you want for nothing. The real litmus test will be if they come out with stickers that people have to pay for, to see if those last as a product, and when companies print up sales literature that they have to pay for printing costs on, whether they choose the sex toy or Beastie. My guess is it will be a long, long time before you see CDROMs from anybody that have deleted Beastie and have the sex toy. The one good thing about all this nonsense is that 5 years from now when there are still hundreds of websites, marketing materials, presentations, CDROMs, and such that prominently feature Beastie, it will pretty much pull the fangs of the argument that "we need to replace Beastie as a logo because as a devil he's causing too many people to not use FreeBSD" which was the main argument that triggered the entire contest and it's sex toy result. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 09:05:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F22016A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:05:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8390843D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:05:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ1007D4L8YZMC0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:05:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([80.203.212.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ100BRGL8RNF00@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:05:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:04:30 +0200 From: Kyrre Nygard In-reply-to: <4461849E.2090107@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?_K=F6nig?= , "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510110402.021867f0@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable References: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> <62840.24.1.139.244.1147227783.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> <44617B7C.8030008@cs.tu-berlin.de> <9DF2732A-2B19-4DE5-8FBB-5AAA793D3134@shire.net> <4461849E.2090107@cs.tu-berlin.de> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:05:44 -0000 At 08:13 10.05.2006, Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: >Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC schrieb: > >>And doesn't beastie represent the complete *BSD family, not just FreeBSD? > >I think so. > >Bj=F6rn Please take this to the advocacy mailinglist. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 09:22:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C68716A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim1timau@yahoo.com) Received: from web50307.mail.yahoo.com (web50307.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6557843D60 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:22:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim1timau@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 85105 invoked by uid 60001); 10 May 2006 09:22:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=6LSzAgBpIQoVEpLPDkqlzj0VFWEgN1qGpGLvwtylFNLcDJkxeXavGj8OVeQ67rvNPToGQrjUyswzGYm8Sz5yMWJvjcLRJoLnjq+uIyfLU4cCNYp0AA4kVAql2EGffk5bKyjj39hWWNTc/9i1U+LMGj24lwqDannxJbdl6M9ufhw= ; Message-ID: <20060510092237.85103.qmail@web50307.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.122.85.73] by web50307.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:22:37 PDT Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:22:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Clewlow To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Unwanted repeated firewire bus reset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:22:42 -0000 Hello, I have two firewire devieces, a pcmcia ieee1394 (firewire) card, and a digital video camera with a firewire output plug. I can get digital video from the camera and write it to disk with the fwcontrol utility, and, I can play back the dv (digital video) file with xdvplay. When I play back the dv file, the sound and picture is fine, which tells me that the pcmcia card is working fine, and, the firewire driver is also working to some extent. However, the problem is there are repeated firewire bus resets occurring. Which interrupts the stream of data coming in from the camera. So i get a couple of seconds of playback, then noise, then a few more seconds of playback. There appears to be no apparent reason for the bus reset, because there are only two firewire devices and so there is no real need to constantly re-elect root devices. Also, the data coming in from the camera is (as far as I am aware) isochronous - which means the camera just sends one frame of data every couple of miliseconds, and does not do any error checking to see if the frame arrived intact (similar to upd - send and forget) - this is the normal way of transporting dv data on firewire because it doesnt really matter if a few pixels change color every now and then due to noise. So, given that there is no change in the device topology - ie no firewire devices are being plugged in or out, and, there is no error checking being done with the dv data transport, is there any real need for repeated bus resets, and is there any way I can instruct the firewire driver to not bother with them after the initial device detection reset has been completed. PS - here is a snippet of the ongoing bus resets - the resets occur approximately once every 4-5 seconds - for no apparent reason Kind regards, Tim. ------------------------------- fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0x8000ffc0, gen=205, non CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop <= 1, cable IRM = 1 firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc000ffc0, gen=206, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0x8000ffc0, gen=207, non CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 2 nodes, maxhop <= 1, cable IRM = 1 firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc000ffc0, gen=208, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 09:44:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5CD16A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliverrojo@anticogroup.com) Received: from anticogroup.com (host.anticogroup.com [209.59.164.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7045D43D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:44:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oliverrojo@anticogroup.com) Received: (qmail 18079 invoked by uid 5510); 10 May 2006 09:45:42 -0000 Received: from 203.131.125.34 by viper.anticogroup.com (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.86.2/1452. spamassassin: 3.0.4. Clear:RC:1(203.131.125.34):. Processed in 0.441514 secs); 10 May 2006 09:45:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.3.191?) (203.131.125.34) by anticogroup.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 09:45:41 -0000 Message-ID: <4461B5DC.2010808@anticogroup.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:43:56 +0800 From: "Oliver A. Rojo" Organization: Antico Manila, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: transparent proxy with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: oliverrojo@anticogroup.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:44:14 -0000 Is there any docs on setting up transparent proxy using squid, ipf, ipnat + freebsd-5.3? -- Oliver A. Rojo ______________________________________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 09:50:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430FD16A42D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asg@suedfactoring.com) Received: from sffwb.suedfactoring.com (pd95b40f5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.91.64.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852D943D6E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:49:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asg@suedfactoring.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sffwb.suedfactoring.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796407EB6C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:49:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sffwb.suedfactoring.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sffwd0.suedfactoring.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02066-02 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:49:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by sffwb.suedfactoring.com (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 1DA517EB6E; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:49:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.4.1.186] (unknown [10.4.1.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sffwb.suedfactoring.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2587EB62 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:49:10 +0200 (CEST) From: "Axel S. Gruner" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:45:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1147254334.715.9.camel@sn001.suedfac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Copyrighted-Material: This material is copyrighted X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suedfactoring.de Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:50:10 -0000 Am Mittwoch, den 10.05.2006, 02:05 -0700 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: > My guess is it will be a long, long time before you see CDROMs > from anybody that have deleted Beastie and have the sex toy. At LinuxTag 2006 in Wiesbaden we had prepared a lot of CDs with the new Logo (what you call a "sex toy"?). We also used the new logo as a flag on our booth. You will find a few pictures here: http://www.encephalon.de/photo/bsd_bilder/lt2006/index.html So, the "long long time" was a really short time ;-). Axel ######################################################################## # DISCLAIMER # # # # Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie nicht der # # angegebene Empfaenger sind oder falls diese Email irrtuemlich an Sie # # addressiert wurde, verstaendigen Sie bitte den Absender sofort und # # loeschen Sie die Email umgehend. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die # # unbefugte Uebermittlung sind nicht gestattet. # # Die Sicherheit von Uebermittlungen per Email kann nicht garantiert # # werden. Falls Sie eine Bestaetigung wuenschen, fordern Sie bitte den # # Inhalt der Email als Hardcopy an. # # # # # # The contents of this e-mail are confidential. # # If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, # # distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately # # if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail # # from your system. Finally, the recipient should check this email and # # any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no # # liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this # # email. # # # # SuedFactoring GmbH, Heilbronner Strasse 86, 70191 Stuttgart # ######################################################################## From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 10:00:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6767F16A409 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cknipe@savage.za.org) Received: from www16b.your-server.co.za (www16b.your-server.co.za [196.22.132.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F366B43D5E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:00:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cknipe@savage.za.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by www16b.your-server.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FdlU8-0000BZ-NA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:00:03 +0200 Received: from 196-207-40-213.gprs.vodacom.co.za (196-207-40-213.gprs.vodacom.co.za [196.207.40.213]) by default.your-server.co.za (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:00:00 +0200 Message-ID: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:00:00 +0200 From: cknipe@savage.za.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 196.207.40.213 Subject: OT: Torn between SCSI and SATA for RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:00:30 -0000 Hi, I've been spending the last couple of days extensively looking at various options for RAID and getting some storage system in place. Performance is not really a BIG issue, but I also don't want to have things hecticly slow either. This will be a NAS type of implementation so speed would be bound by relatively speaking slow network connections in any case... Now first things first as well, I did look at Fiber Channels too - and the tecnology is just to expensive and complex for a home type implementation that I want this for. Ideally, I'd like to start at 2TB of storage (yes, those movies must go somewhere!), but I'd like to be able to grow this as times go by... I also definately want redundancy on the data, as I just lost 80GB of precious data when ironically, a 160GB SATA Seagate went out under me. Now SCSI I know, is more expensive than SATA. Whether it provides beter performance than SATA I'm still uncertain off, but gut would tell me that due to the cost factor, SCSI *should* run away as far as speed is concerned. But also as I said previously, speed and performance is not a priority for my implementation and therefore it has very little weight. This makes me look at SATA then therefore. My problem with SATA, is the whole 1 Port, 1 Drive scenario. I've looked at the Adaptec 16 Port SATA Controller. The reviews I managed to get on that card on the Internet, paints a very grim picture. Buggered Firmware, the controller destroys drives, and general sluggish performance. Is anyone using this card that can perhaps give me a better picture? Given than the 16 Port (for now) is out of the question, I have a 8 Port, 4 Port and 2 Port (which isn't really worth looking at even) available to me. Now, even with a 8 Port card... Let's look at what I can achieve: Ports 1+2: 750GB Seagates (Biggest available), 1.5TB <- I'm short on my 2TB Initial Ports 3+4: Mirror of 1+2 Already, I am coming short of what I want to achieve, and I also have no expansion available to me for upgrades... With the 16 Port cards, what I want to achieve becomes quite possible, up to easy about 6TB of data - but I risk loosing drives *IF* what I read about the card is true. Also a gamble, considering the relatively high price of large SATA drives. Another thing that I read that I'm not completely sure about. Some of the Adaptec SCSI Cards advertises a max of 30 devices - some even more. Excuse the ignorance, but does the SCSI Bus not allow for a max of 8 devices? Do these cards then feature multiple buses to connect the cables to? If so, SATA will obviously not be able to provide something like this. Now comes my question... Uhm.. Can SATA RAID Controllers be 'linked'. Say, I but 4 x 8-Port Adaptec SATA RAID Controllers... 2 x 8 Port Cards = 16 Ports for 1 RAID 5 Array (@ 750GB Drives, 12TB Max). The other 2 cards, to mirror. I know that I can use one Controller to mirror another, but can I extend a array across multiple controllers... And then naturally, just HOW much slower does the array function? I've seen some comments and posts (esp. on slashdot) made where people go about running massive arrays successfully on SATA. Given the limits on the Ports at the controller, just how is this achieved? Sorry that this is so OT, but I hope I'd get some good answers. This is definately not something that's been discussed allot before considering the amount of info I got after spending a number of days on google... -- Chris. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 10:08:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA05E16A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from pinnacle.akherb.com (60-105-237-24.gci.net [24.237.105.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CD743D7D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:08:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix, from userid 1007) id C588E5D45; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:08:40 -0800 (AKDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pinnacle.akherb.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 Received: from [192.168.241.106] (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E0B5CD5 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:08:39 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:08:37 -0800 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4901456.I9crSk6eIv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605100208.38485.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:08:55 -0000 --nextPart4901456.I9crSk6eIv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 10 May 2006 01:05, you wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:beech@alaskaparadise.com] > >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:41 AM > >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Cc: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC; Ted Mittelstaedt > >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > > > > >That's all well and good, but I for one don't plan to replace > >the "powered by" > >beastie logo on any of my sites with that sex-toy. It would be > >interesting to > >see how many webmasters agree with me. > > Webmasters have it easy, you get plenty of resolution on the Web > and as many colors as you want for free, and you can print as many > copies as you want for nothing. > > The real litmus test will be if they come out with stickers that > people have to pay for, to see if those last as a product, and > when companies print up sales literature that they have to pay > for printing costs on, whether they choose the sex toy or Beastie. > > My guess is it will be a long, long time before you see CDROMs > from anybody that have deleted Beastie and have the sex toy. > > The one good thing about all this nonsense is that 5 years from > now when there are still hundreds of websites, marketing materials, > presentations, CDROMs, and such that prominently feature Beastie, > it will pretty much pull the fangs of the argument that "we need > to replace Beastie as a logo because as a devil he's causing too > many people to not use FreeBSD" which was the main argument that > triggered the entire contest and it's sex toy result. > > Ted The most interesting time I've had with beastie was setting up servers and = a=20 website for a Baptist org here in Alaska. I put beastie on the site thinkin= g=20 it would never be approved. They were seeking donations and were very=20 sensitive about the site's image. Not only did the clergy approve the site= =20 with the "powered by" logo, they thought beastie was "cute".=20 Even after several irate emails about displaying the "devil" on a church si= te,=20 the logo remained. It was decided that several narrow minded people did not= =20 warrant removing it. I didn't even have to explain what a daemon is. Several months later the site won an award at one of their national=20 conventions. The plaque featured a screen shot of the front page complete=20 with beastie! If people are refraining from using FreeBSD because of beastie (which I don= 't=20 believe), they really need to just grow up. If the Baptists don't have any= =20 problem with him, I can't imagine anyone else objecting. Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart4901456.I9crSk6eIv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEYbump5D0B1NlT4URAv9JAJwM21ezTOIe25uzPaM/ogCtu5JE4wCffasg 3tNRmqDKqc/+LVWQTt2/fTI= =/2dT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4901456.I9crSk6eIv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 10:42:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE82316A403 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3C643D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:42:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1685501nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:42:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KL2UlIgjUL6XT0pPCuZMC30PqwGPFYt7NyeYEIpCOSz5wyIcmpCqucVwddhemcCYESYAaEhYz4Z6idv7hWSF5Wxdc29VFaytit60YlmORa8e/fbGTQZZQdZ3SDirqA/vBL8gdAKRVLSN7lUpWQVlxGib+v7t4KUZuSBgZj2RwgY= Received: by 10.64.251.15 with SMTP id y15mr251120qbh; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.180.8 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:42:17 +0000 From: "Kep Woof" To: "Bill Moran" In-Reply-To: <20060509065607.63e8f064.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <9c8168780605090252l241bdc42h99f5b12f5b38f324@mail.gmail.com> <20060509065607.63e8f064.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:42:19 -0000 hi, On 5/9/06, Bill Moran wrote: > Then take this to chat@freebsd.org. It's just flame bait here. I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think it's a big joke?=20 The new logo already looks dated, and will only get worse with time. I'm trying to make a serious point. Imagine if imacs were still made of transparent coloured plastic. So if this is the wrong list (which was a concern I mentioned in the first line of my original post) where is the right list? I'm not saying save beasite, although I personally think he's awesome. I'm saying think about the future. FreeBSD Tshirt sales are going to plummet. kep From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 10:48:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E68716A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jad@nominet.org.uk) Received: from mx4.nominet.org.uk (mx4.nominet.org.uk [213.248.199.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C378F43D53 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jad@nominet.org.uk) Received: from wds1.okna.nominet.org.uk (HELO notes1.nominet.org.uk) ([213.248.197.128]) by mx4.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 10 May 2006 11:48:32 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,109,1146438000"; d="scan'208"; a="3313472:sNHT29834264" In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> To: "Kep Woof" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.5 November 30, 2005 Message-ID: From: jad@nominet.org.uk Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:48:25 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes1/Nominet(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 05/10/2006 11:48:25 AM, Serialize complete at 05/10/2006 11:48:25 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:48:34 -0000 owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17: > hi, > > On 5/9/06, Bill Moran wrote: > > > Then take this to chat@freebsd.org. It's just flame bait here. > > I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended > up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think it's a big joke? > The new logo already looks dated, and will only get worse with time. > This happened ages ago and was announced in the news section of the website See - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 11:01:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2193516A40E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:01:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trobalo@mrna.ist.utl.pt) Received: from smtp1.ist.utl.pt (smtp1.ist.utl.pt [193.136.128.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E6E43D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trobalo@mrna.ist.utl.pt) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFED97000556 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:01:34 +0100 (WEST) Received: from smtp1.ist.utl.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with LMTP id 29447-01-13 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:01:34 +0100 (WEST) Received: from mrna.ist.utl.pt (mRNA.ist.utl.pt [193.136.165.100]) by smtp1.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E007000A36 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:01:34 +0100 (WEST) Received: from Ribossoma.ist.utl.pt (Ribossoma.ist.utl.pt [193.136.165.125]) by mrna.ist.utl.pt (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:01:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20060510130133.o8foxi2u808cwg80@mrna.ist.utl.pt> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:01:33 +0200 From: trobalo@mrna.ist.utl.pt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1) / FreeBSD-6.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ist.utl.pt Subject: proftpd & jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:01:41 -0000 we have a problem with proftp running in a jail -> pf.conf ext_if=3D"em0" ip_ext=3D"*.*.*.*" ip_jail=3D"127.0.0.3" rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ip_ext port 20 -> $ip_jail port 20 rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ip_ext port 21 -> $ip_jail port 21 rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ip_ext port 49152:52000 -> $ip_jail port 49152:52000 pass in log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ip_jail port 20 flags S/SAFR keep state pass in log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ip_jail port 21 flags S/SAFR keep state pass in log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ip_jail port 49151 >< 52001 pass out log quick on $ext_if proto tcp from $ip_jail port 49151 >< 52001 to any -> proftpd.conf ServerName "SERVER X" ServerType standalone DefaultServer on ScoreboardFile /var/run/proftpd.scoreboard ExtendedLog /var/log/proftpd.log AllowForeignAddress on PassivePorts 49152 52000 IdentLookups off DisplayConnect /etc/motd Port 21 Umask 022 MaxInstances 30 User nobody Group nogroup AllowOverwrite on DenyAll -> proftp log: *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:23 +0100] "NOOP" 200 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:23 +0100] "CWD /usr/home/teste/" 250 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:23 +0100] "TYPE A" 200 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:23 +0100] "PASV" 227 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:24 +0100] "USER anonymous" 331 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN nobody [09/May/2006:10:36:24 +0100] "PASS (hidden)" 530 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:24 +0100] "NOOP" 200 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:24 +0100] "CWD /usr/home/test/" 250 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:24 +0100] "TYPE A" 200 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:24 +0100] "PASV" 227 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN nobody [09/May/2006:10:36:27 +0100] "USER test" 331 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:27 +0100] "PASS (hidden)" 230 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:27 +0100] "OPTS utf8 on" 501 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:27 +0100] "PWD" 257 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:27 +0100] "NOOP" 200 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:27 +0100] "CWD /usr/home/test/" 250 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:27 +0100] "TYPE A" 200 - *.*.*.* UNKNOWN test [09/May/2006:10:36:27 +0100] "PASV" 227 - If we use ftp browse (firefox, IE) or ms-dos we can?t open ftp contents, it appears the login window but after that show this error: "An error occurred opening that folder on the FTP Server. Make sure that you have permission to access that folder drwx------ 3 test wheel 512 May 8 18:48 teste using chmod 777 the error continues. sugestions? thanks a lot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:10:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F158316A40A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp103.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 232AA43D6D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:10:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 32010 invoked from network); 10 May 2006 12:10:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=qumXRp+wrInD17hyKb6QEmzVdd7dzYCuO9M3NWUfkKdYsfcZ2RVQm3TMgEOqzDsu1AFfbLdwpX+KYgwaCbPFE+ZuvtdmV2U6NVoJkQ5lO/ZGeeZWXAa6WSFMho+UGO1lD+o0Vzosz4sEQTz6TcwTInPqre2D00faXE5mIYt2zqY= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.7.202?) (strbenjr@69.143.43.222 with plain) by smtp103.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 12:10:42 -0000 Message-ID: <4461D83A.8030902@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:10:34 -0400 From: Ben Hacker Jr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051005) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4460757B.5030107@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subhro Subject: Re: Upgrade 5.4 - 6.0 errors. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:10:59 -0000 I am following the instructions from /usr/src/UPGRADING To upgrade in-place from 5.x-stable or higher to 6.x-stable ----------------------------------------------------------- make buildworld [9] make kernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE [8] [1] [3] mergemaster -p [5] make installworld mergemaster -i [4] I am still getting the same error/failure when building the Kernel. (I also tried "make buildkernel...") Subhro wrote: > On 5/9/06, Ben Hacker Jr wrote: > >> Is there a way to clean out my /usr/src directory and start from >> scratch (cvsup) >> in case it is corrupted some how?? > > > rm -rf /usr/src/* > > > >> >> $ su root -c "make kernel KERNCONF=HACK06" > > > The correct command is make buildkernel KERNCONF=HACK06 > and not make kernel > > You need to read the handbook :-) > > > > > Thanks and Best Regards > Subhro > > -- > Subhro Kar > Security Engineer > iViZ Techno Solutions Pvt. Ltd. > eRevMax House, 1st Floor > Plot XI-16, Sector V > Salt Lake City > 700091 > India > strben@hackserver$ uname -a FreeBSD hackserver.family.hom 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Sep 12 08:18:05 EDT 2005 strben@hackserver.family.hom:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HACK05 i386 strben@hackserver$ su root -c "make buildkernel KERNCONF=HACK06" ... MAKE=/usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh HACK06 cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -I/usr/src/sys/dev/twa -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror vers.c linking kernel.debug if_ural.o(.text+0x3bb): In function `ural_attach': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:458: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ieee2mhz' if_ural.o(.text+0x3ef):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:463: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ieee2mhz' if_ural.o(.text+0x427):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:468: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ieee2mhz' if_ural.o(.text+0x4bb):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:480: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ieee2mhz' if_ural.o(.text+0x4e2):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:487: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ifattach' if_ural.o(.text+0x513):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:493: undefined reference to `ieee80211_media_status' if_ural.o(.text+0x51e):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:493: undefined reference to `ieee80211_media_init' if_ural.o(.text+0x580):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:507: undefined reference to `ieee80211_announce' if_ural.o(.text+0x628): In function `ural_detach': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:535: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ifdetach' if_ural.o(.text+0x73a): In function `ural_free_tx_list': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:595: undefined reference to `ieee80211_free_node' if_ural.o(.text+0x8f6): In function `ural_media_change': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:673: undefined reference to `ieee80211_media_change' if_ural.o(.text+0x9ac): In function `ural_next_scan': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:699: undefined reference to `ieee80211_next_scan' if_ural.o(.text+0xb17): In function `ural_task': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:756: undefined reference to `ieee80211_beacon_alloc' if_ural.o(.text+0xc77): In function `ural_txeof': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:826: undefined reference to `ieee80211_free_node' if_ural.o(.text+0xd9d): In function `ural_rxeof': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:890: undefined reference to `ieee80211_find_rxnode' if_ural.o(.text+0xdb3):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:893: undefined reference to `ieee80211_input' if_ural.o(.text+0xdbb):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:896: undefined reference to `ieee80211_free_node' if_ural.o(.text+0x1364): In function `ural_tx_data': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1218: undefined reference to `ieee80211_crypto_encap' if_ural.o(.text+0x185c): In function `ural_start': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1321: undefined reference to `ieee80211_find_txnode' if_ural.o(.text+0x1894):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1328: undefined reference to `ieee80211_encap' if_ural.o(.text+0x18a3):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1330: undefined reference to `ieee80211_free_node' if_ural.o(.text+0x18db):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1338: undefined reference to `ieee80211_free_node' if_ural.o(.text+0x19c8): In function `ural_watchdog': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1370: undefined reference to `ieee80211_watchdog' if_ural.o(.text+0x1ad6): In function `ural_ioctl': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1417: undefined reference to `ieee80211_ioctl' if_ural.o(.text+0x1f5c): In function `ural_set_chan': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:1606: undefined reference to `ieee80211_chan2ieee' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HACK06. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. strben@hackserver$ -- Ben Hacker, Jr. Network Security Analyst strbenjr {at} yahoo.com -- -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:13:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D2916A4CD for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A4B43D5E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:13:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([70.39.69.56]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060510121329.ZKKW9479.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:13:29 -0400 From: "fbsd" To: , "Kep Woof" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:13:24 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:13:37 -0000 As a long time reader of this list I did not see any announcement of it here. Only after selection of the new logo was made was it talked about on this list People were very up set with it them and the ground swell over this has only gotten bigger. Loyal long time users are feeling insulted about being left out from the decision about the need for a new logo. A post in the archive give some lame reasons for a new logo which many people disagreed with even then but still the new legal FreeBSD foundation went ahead any how put it on the official website. I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all. I would say special effort was made to keep this whole new logo thing a secret from the general user population. That also goes for the formation of the new legal FreeBSD foundation. Not a word of it happening on this list until it was a done deal. You can see from this thread just how big a stink this is making. Lets point the finger at the real reason for the new logo. As part of the new legal FreeBSD foundation, the people who set it up though it's better to own the complete rights to the logo. So being pressed for time they choose to keep it off the questions list and pushed it through selecting what ever logo they had just to meet the filing dead line for the new legal FreeBSD foundation formation. For those of you who think this subject is flame bait, YOU ARE WHY THIS NEW LOGO IDEA WAS EVEN ABLE TO GET OFF THE GROUND IN THE FIRST PLACE. Sham on you, shut your pie hole. I want to know the email addresses of the people in control of the new foundation and everyone on this list who does not like the new logo and/or the way in which it was forced upon us should email them to voice our dissatisfaction directly to them. Because its obvious posting on this list has no effect or value in determining what happens to the legal FreeBSD organization and thus the logo used to represent us. If you want your voice in this matter to be effective you have to email those in legal control of the FreeBSD foundation. It's time they stop hiding and become accountable for their collective actions. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of jad@nominet.org.uk Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:48 AM To: Kep Woof Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17: > hi, > > On 5/9/06, Bill Moran wrote: > > > Then take this to chat@freebsd.org. It's just flame bait here. > > I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended > up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think it's a big joke? > The new logo already looks dated, and will only get worse with time. > This happened ages ago and was announced in the news section of the website See - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ John _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:24:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98D916A403 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:24:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6429043D49 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:24:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13334) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FdnkK-0008R3-C1 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:24:52 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A9A58110C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:24:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from http.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C888E58110B for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:24:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6924758C605 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:24:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4461DB91.50008@scii.nl> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:24:49 +0200 From: albi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: switching to postfixadmin and converting passwords for mail-users X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:24:55 -0000 hi, i've been testing dovecot+postfix+postfixadmin and i'm very happy with the results! postfixadmin-website : http://high5.net/postfixadmin/ now i wonder how to convert passwords (from the traditional password-file) from the old (normal) setup to this mysql-based setup with virtual users i've googled around for a while and looked at the postfixadmin-FAQ, and found nothing yet of course i can make the new install available for the users and provide them with random passwords and then let them change it themselves, but a script or something would be much easier and faster -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:35:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF26A16A43D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA14543D49 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:35:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13200) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Fdnu9-000FUm-0A for questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:35:01 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC17158110C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from http.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE5658110B for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07DE58C6F8 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4461DDF1.1000204@scii.nl> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:34:57 +0200 From: albi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org References: <4461DB91.50008@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <4461DB91.50008@scii.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: Re: switching to postfixadmin and converting passwords for mail-users X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:35:06 -0000 albi wrote: > now i wonder how to convert passwords (from the traditional > password-file) from the old (normal) setup to this mysql-based setup > with virtual users ahum, sorry for the noise, i just realised that of course dovecot+mysql does the auth when connecting to imap, so no need to convert at all -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:38:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F8B16A405 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100EF43D49 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:38:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([70.39.69.56]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060510123818.JWQC9009.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:38:18 -0400 From: "fbsd" To: "Beech Rintoul" , Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:38:17 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200605100041.23001.beech@alaskaparadise.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:38:19 -0000 As a long time reader of this list I did not see any announcement of it here. Only after selection of the new logo was made was it talked about on this list. People were very up set with it them and the ground swell over this has only gotten bigger. Loyal long time users are feeling insulted about being left out from the decision about the need for a new logo. A post in the archive give some lame reasons for a new logo which many people disagreed with even then but still the new legal FreeBSD foundation went ahead any how putting it on the official website removing the "beastie" logo. I for one do not see any need to change the logo at all. It's just as professional as the "penguin". I would say special effort was made to keep this whole new logo thing a secret from the general user population. That also goes for the formation of the new legal FreeBSD foundation. Not a word of it happening on this list until it was a done deal. You can see from this thread just how big a stink this is making. Lets point the finger at the real reason for the new logo. As part of the new legal FreeBSD foundation, the people who set it up though it's better to own the complete legal rights to the logo. The "beastie" logo legal rights is owned by an individual. So being pressed for time they choose to keep it off the questions list and pushed it through selecting what ever logo they had just to meet the filing dead line for the new legal FreeBSD foundation formation. For those of you who think this subject is flame bait, YOU ARE WHY THIS NEW LOGO IDEA WAS EVEN ABLE TO GET OFF THE GROUND IN THE FIRST PLACE. Sham on you, shut your pie hole. I want to know the email addresses of the people in control of the new foundation and everyone on this list who does not like the new logo and/or the way in which it was forced upon us should email them to voice our dissatisfaction directly to them. Because its obvious posting on this list has no effect or value in determining what happens to the legal FreeBSD organization and thus the logo used to represent us. If you want your voice in this matter to be effective you have to email those in legal control of the FreeBSD foundation. It's time they stop hiding and become accountable for their stupid collective actions. Its time the FreeBSD foundation offer an binding vote by the general user population from all the FreeBSD lists to settle this question once and for all about the "beastie" logo being the official FreeBSD foundation logo. This even includes our brothers and sisters in other countries who have their own FreeBSD.org websites and don't even know about this logo problem yet. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:44:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D6516A404 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB39343D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:44:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:13175) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Fdo3D-000D5p-S1; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:44:23 +0000 Received: from aseed.demon.nl (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC92D58110B; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:44:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from http.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by aseed.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B002B581108; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:44:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286AB58C605; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:44:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4461E024.4000407@scii.nl> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:44:20 +0200 From: albi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: albi References: <4461DB91.50008@scii.nl> <4461DDF1.1000204@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <4461DDF1.1000204@scii.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: switching to postfixadmin and converting passwords for mail-users X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:44:25 -0000 albi wrote: > i just realised that of course dovecot+mysql does the auth when > connecting to imap, so no need to convert at all hmm, i better wake up properly with some more coffee, because this is completely nonsense my original question is still valid, in the meantime i've found this : http://forums.high5.net/index.php?showtopic=1477&pid=18724&st=0&#entry18724 but that's for converting qmail/vpopmail to postfixadmin afaik that still doesn't use the traditional password-file based password -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:45:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028D116A40A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arsptr@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB9A43D62 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:45:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arsptr@optusnet.com.au) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (c211-30-182-34.rivrw1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.182.34]) by mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ACjGav021124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:45:16 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--693297638" Message-Id: <3655B84C-03FA-454B-A601-72DCEE8AE4E7@optusnet.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alastair Rankine Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:45:10 +1000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Gpgmail-State: signed X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) Subject: Re: Filesystem corruption when drives are mirrored, but not otherwise X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:45:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-1--693297638 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 02/05/2006, at 10:18 PM, I wrote: > The story is this: two identical WD 250GB SATA drives, attached to > a Promise FastTrak S150 TX2plus. > > The drives work fine independently (ie non-mirrored). But when I > mirror them using GEOM, I get filesystem corruption (see below for > example fsck output). It seems that this was caused by the (infamous) problem when softupdates and write caching are both enabled. Disabling write caching seems to have fixed the problem. Unfortunately the disk write performance is woeful. There must be a better way surely? Is anyone using GEOM mirrors on ATA disks with softupdates and write caching? If so, what's your secret? --Apple-Mail-1--693297638 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkRh4FoACgkQ9jqa2eRLIcdZsACfdUP5mKACvpBhvl+Nzzk0sgVT qDEAoNg0P5zaATPl1Iq7IPexdTDV9KkJ =cU7m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-1--693297638-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:50:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCCD16A511 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F000B43D8D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:50:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (AUTH: PLAIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:50:12 -0400 id 00056410.4461E184.00005762 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:49:35 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: jekillen Message-Id: <20060510084935.4f9fc022.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> References: <70e7a849de4fe4c6c1c6aaba7401fc91@prodigy.net> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:50:20 -0000 On Tue, 9 May 2006 19:04:49 -0700 jekillen wrote: > I am not offended by the new or the old > logo, accept that there seems to be too much > of a trend toward cartoon character art. This, I presume is to appeal > to the child in us all. But seriously when do we > actually get to be grownups. I don't want to be a grownup. If FreeBSD ever gets serious enough that it makes me feel like a grownup, I'll switch careers. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:59:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E3E16A4C7 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D04E43DA9 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so1214254wxc for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:59:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HKKZNgSQFlAtHTPbIdr6gLdNVb3GmvkNSjfgJkZh8lxVdq24hAWfzvxMCrBgVeAqStSAXuRB77KxYjGTUWCzf/ZyfffsgK69FR7mG0IiyplC+SIBIq/1AJDg4qigi8BakDYV1T0ag9WgJ4qJJlOHVjj+beD04KV8OiaYKAZQy14= Received: by 10.70.117.5 with SMTP id p5mr372086wxc; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:59:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.76.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:59:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80f4f2b20605100559y3d24304exe4552814855d9959@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:59:12 -0400 From: "Jim Stapleton" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "cknipe@savage.za.org" In-Reply-To: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> Cc: Subject: Re: OT: Torn between SCSI and SATA for RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:35 -0000 I've found that scsi isn't exceptionally faster given similar RPMs, or even slightly higher RPM (ex. a 10K RPM SCSI vs. 10K RPM SATA drive would have simlar performance). However, SCSI tends to high tighter standards, and you get the following advantages, which in some cases are worth the money, and in some cases arent: (1) More reliable/accurate reads/writes (2) Longer expected lifespan My advice for reliability is a RAID-1 setup with the most cost-effective disks you can find, then use the OS to do a drive spanning so you can put them in the same mount point (when it runs to the end of a disk, it starts on the next). I'm not sure if the drive spanning is possible though - I've not looked into it, though given that Windows can do it, I don't see why FreeBSD would have trouble. If that is still too expensive, you could try RAID-5, but the problem with that is, adding new disks wouldn't be quite as easy, you may not be able to use the RAID set until you get the replacement disk, and it's not quite as fast (I could be wrong on this part) as RAID1 in the case of writes. > with a 8 Port card... Let's look at what I can achieve: > Ports 1+2: 750GB Seagates (Biggest available), 1.5TB <- I'm short on my 2= TB > Initial > Ports 3+4: Mirror of 1+2 Maybe I'm missing something, where ports 4-8 (actually, 0 + 4-7)? With 8 500GB drives, and RAID1, you should be able to get 2TB out of that (and more cost effective than 750GB drives) Have you considered using two controller cards? > nother thing that I read that I'm not completely sure about. Some of the > Adaptec SCSI Cards advertises a max of 30 devices - some even more. Excu= se the > ignorance, but does the SCSI Bus not allow for a max of 8 devices? Do th= ese > cards then feature multiple buses to connect the cables to? If so, SATA = will > obviously not be able to provide something like this. 8 devices, 1 is the controller, I think some newer busses hold 16 devices, is is the controlelr, (so 7 or 15 drives). Now, a card may have multiple busses. I have an A-Ha 39160 in my machine, and if I remember correctly it has 2 busses on it (or is it three?), I don't use it to nearly it's capacity, I just got it for the price of a 19160, and I couldn't turn down that option. > Now comes my question... Uhm.. Can SATA RAID Controllers be 'linked'. Sa= y, I > but 4 x 8-Port Adaptec SATA RAID Controllers... 2 x 8 Port Cards =3D 16 P= orts for > 1 RAID 5 Array (@ 750GB Drives, 12TB Max). The other 2 cards, to mirror.= I > know that I can use one Controller to mirror another, but can I extend a = array > across multiple controllers... And then naturally, just HOW much slower d= oes > the array function? The array will be using system cpu/memory, so quite a bit, and it'll cause a hit on system perofrmance, however, the trick here is you can do what I mentioned above with some trickery (I think), and just have the OS "link" the two file systems, it's not any RAID form, and shouldn't cost much performance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:02:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828E916A4A0 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:02:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E10D43DA4 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:01:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (AUTH: PLAIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:01:46 -0400 id 00056405.4461E43A.00005938 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:01:14 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: cknipe@savage.za.org Message-Id: <20060510090114.0bfc75a8.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> References: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Torn between SCSI and SATA for RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:02:17 -0000 On Wed, 10 May 2006 12:00:00 +0200 cknipe@savage.za.org wrote: > Hi, > > I've been spending the last couple of days extensively looking at various > options for RAID and getting some storage system in place. Performance is not > really a BIG issue, but I also don't want to have things hecticly slow either. > This will be a NAS type of implementation so speed would be bound by relatively > speaking slow network connections in any case... http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:06:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B7C16A5A8 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kariukiphares@yahoo.com) Received: from web50508.mail.yahoo.com (web50508.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCD2B43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:06:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kariukiphares@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 4332 invoked by uid 60001); 10 May 2006 13:06:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VhRRk9OT1OHTGes21HG1+J1xEczECIypRy1qpZTVmtx1SLQkw3Xni1+TRW3DxCIHl48T1b9lToaU1YT5it50VPcIV7XSc+xwQTvMMKNS5SFuudd595nR25hFOkXEsixRuOVgs/Bto96Pqdq5VN9xUol7Ujhf1owaVjVn5i4mXtM= ; Message-ID: <20060510130603.4330.qmail@web50508.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [196.202.220.136] by web50508.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:06:03 PDT Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 06:06:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Kariuki Kaboro To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Samba Domain Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kariukiphares@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:06:09 -0000 Hi, I successfuly installed FreeBSD 5.4 with Samba 3.02 off the ports collection. However, there is one problem. The windows machines i am trying to add to my domains give me an error that they cannot contact the local domain controller. Thanks. Kaboro Phares. Yours Truly, Phares Kariuki --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:09:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFE516A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Gabor@Zahemszky.HU) Received: from mta01.mail.t-online.hu (mta04.mail.t-online.hu [195.228.240.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443ED43D4C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:09:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Gabor@Zahemszky.HU) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dsl51B6175E.pool.t-online.hu [81.182.23.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.t-online.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:09:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4461E601.2010709@Zahemszky.HU> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:09:21 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Zahemszky_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: mount_smbfs locking? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:09:24 -0000 Hi! Are there any mechanism to "lock" files (as the Win-clients), shared by a Windows-server, and reached on a smbfs-mounted file system? I haven' found any mount options in mount_smbfs's manual. Bye, Gábor -- #!/bin/ksh Z='21N16I25C25E30, 40M30E33E25T15U!';IFS=' ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ ';set -- $Z;for i;{ [[ $i = ? ]]&&print $i&&break;[[ $i = ??? ]]&&j=$i&&i=${i%?};typeset -i40 i=8#$i;print -n ${i#???};[[ "$j" = ??? ]]&&print -n "${j#??} "&&j=;typeset +i i;};IFS=' 0123456789 ';set -- $Z;for i;{ [[ $i = , ]]&&i=2;[[ $i = ?? ]]||typeset -l i;j="$j $i";typeset +l i;};print "$j" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:17:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C7716A407 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1ABB43D72 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so1217108wxc for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:17:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=UcKofESSzosHk09S5ZT+xD7pAamRGXsYGAipZcx1CJBN/EQPsR7ItU/erBoxWhiMXsU5BvzkVUEk/cfRLEnGr2MkKTJaU8MHVkmAJfpRPIk7Sxt+56fJtWgvkbPL8hYqqScgHkZcRrbroG/86brRHNOvSnIVdzJWzHKJBeLFJG4= Received: by 10.70.109.20 with SMTP id h20mr402083wxc; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.76.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80f4f2b20605100617t3adfc57brc213c8571288727f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:17:30 -0400 From: "Jim Stapleton" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: securing beyond the handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:17:42 -0000 I'm about to get a static IP and direct outside access for my BSD box (before it was hidden behind a firewall/NAT). I was comfortable with the level of security I've had, but with the whole "open to the outside world" setup I'll have, what would you suggest for securing it? I'll be running: Apache PHP MySQL SSH/SFTP OpenRPG (only occasionally, from a special nonpriv account) Any suggestions, any of these that you know are such huge security holes that you would absolutely demand something else be run? Any other security suggestions? Thanks, -Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:19:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C79216A512 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C46043D4C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:19:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so1376491nfa for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=U068HgmUpQHK9SR/FOmBgdB9llwGQK2hz001lHy0csRAJCvmfGCfPTKcnaGbvCoTtaj1Cep8L8b86jC7evVFy0fBD5WXry5Ov5wo1uB93oEVYgDMgdpiHUBqLMR6ppkSGF/j+cCQwWZWzvWOOZ5CAuHXhhbQeFYXjKyp7kBTPFE= Received: by 10.49.21.19 with SMTP id y19mr569016nfi; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.43.2 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <27dbfc8c0605100554v377be7ffpb19a5163349c7f17@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:54:39 +0200 From: "Valerio daelli" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Question on NFS performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:19:33 -0000 Hi all we have a FreeBSD 5.4 exporting some NFS filesystem to a cluster of gentoo = boxes (kernel 2.6.12). Our exported storage disk is an Apple XRaid. We have Gigabit Ethernet both on the client and the server. We would like to improve our read performance. This is our performance: about 10Mb reading a file of 1Gb with dd and iozone confirms this result. We already use the normal optimization flags (we use rpc.lockd and rpc.statd, on the client we have read size 65536 and a read ahead of 4 blocks, the async options). Is our performance the best we can get? Can we improve it? Thanks for your help Valerio Daelli From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:23:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA6A16A5B8 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:23:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C5B43D66 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:23:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ADMcsj074851; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:22:38 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060510082022.02797738@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:22:30 -0500 To: kariukiphares@yahoo.com, questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <20060510130603.4330.qmail@web50508.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060510130603.4330.qmail@web50508.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Samba Domain Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:23:03 -0000 You would do better to post to the samba list. WHen you post to that list you should specify what domain controllers (are they win2k domain controllers, active directory, what server OS is the primary controller) you have, and how you want your samba server to integrate into this domain/forest. -Derek At 08:06 AM 5/10/2006, Kariuki Kaboro wrote: >Hi, > I successfuly installed FreeBSD 5.4 with Samba 3.02 off the > ports collection. However, there is one problem. The windows machines i > am trying to add to my domains give me an error that they cannot > contact the local domain controller. > > Thanks. > > Kaboro Phares. > > >Yours Truly, > >Phares Kariuki > >--------------------------------- >Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:25:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62E116A5D7 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDE843D5A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:24:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k4ADOgTB015996; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:24:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k4ADOf5s015995; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:24:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200605101324.k4ADOf5s015995@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:24:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Beech Rintoul , "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:25:01 -0000 > > As a long time reader of this list I did not see any > announcement of it here. Only after selection of the > new logo was made was it talked about on this list. > People were very up set with it them and the ground > swell over this has only gotten bigger. It was clearly announced with dates and how to make submissions and all and then the closure of the submissions was announced. There was a lot of griping on the list about why bother and such, but not much real objection until the robo-beastie - or would it be space-beastie - was chosen. Though I am not fond of the new thing, it is not because the process of acquiring it was not announced. I do think there was a failure to get better input on the candidates after submissions were made. The process, or lack thereof, of selecting was rather lame. > Loyal long time users are feeling insulted about being > left out from the decision about the need for a new logo. They were not left out, except by their own choice of not making any submission. > A post in the archive give some lame reasons for a new logo > which many people disagreed with even then but still the > new legal FreeBSD foundation went ahead any how putting it > on the official website removing the "beastie" logo. > > I for one do not see any need to change the logo at all. > It's just as professional as the "penguin". > > I would say special effort was made to keep this whole > new logo thing a secret from the general user population. Nope, it was well publicized. > That also goes for the formation of the new legal FreeBSD > foundation. > Not a word of it happening on this list until it was a done deal. > You can see from this thread just how big a stink this is making. Many words were posted. > Lets point the finger at the real reason for the new logo. > As part of the new legal FreeBSD foundation, the people who > set it up though it's better to own the complete legal rights > to the logo. The "beastie" logo legal rights is owned by > an individual. So being pressed for time they choose to keep it > off the questions list and pushed it through selecting what > ever logo they had just to meet the filing dead line for > the new legal FreeBSD foundation formation. Maybe, who knows. > > For those of you who think this subject is flame bait, > YOU ARE WHY THIS NEW LOGO IDEA WAS EVEN ABLE TO GET OFF > THE GROUND IN THE FIRST PLACE. > > Sham on you, shut your pie hole. That was unnecessary and adds nothing to the discussion. > I want to know the email addresses of the people in control of > the new foundation and everyone on this list who does not like > the new logo and/or the way in which it was forced upon us > should email them to voice our dissatisfaction directly to them. > Because its obvious posting on this list has no effect or value > in determining what happens to the legal FreeBSD organization > and thus the logo used to represent us. > If you want your voice in this matter to be effective you have > to email those in legal control of the FreeBSD foundation. > It's time they stop hiding and become accountable for > their stupid collective actions. Use whatever logo you want. Give up trash talking. > Its time the FreeBSD foundation offer an binding vote by the general > user population from all the FreeBSD lists to settle this question > once and for all about the "beastie" logo being the > official FreeBSD foundation logo. This even includes our brothers > and sisters in other countries who have their own FreeBSD.org > websites and don't even know about this logo problem yet. There never has been a binding vote on anything outside of possibly the core group. Why would a dumb piece of graphics need it. You are missing something. ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:49:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5BF16A420 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8A743D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1720973nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:49:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lt/ICAL/xlSsDUI4PqT+MjsmmHFCRfo7NfNhg1xGt6Orqu5IAYMIaRiZKN4puM7TnVcPInsGRq+CKbxq1IHWBODGADNe59MB5PF6fvxaphw5k12JeXMzCbwnz5wlNo4OGR5ttuMAHANiAMV0a6dbQRISWWfpdMijPkx2n5psnQs= Received: by 10.64.209.15 with SMTP id h15mr366012qbg; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.180.8 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:20 +0000 From: "Kep Woof" To: "jad@nominet.org.uk" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:22 -0000 Hi, thanks for the pointer.. On 5/10/06, jad@nominet.org.uk wrote: > > This happened ages ago and was announced in the news section of the > website > > See - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ However, where were the other designs? I think a contest was potentially a good idea, but my suspicion is that the entries were rather poor, and the current logo was simply the best of a bad bunch? It seems wierd that only commiters were given a vote - while I respect their technical judement without quarrel, geeks don't seem to have the same grasp on aesethetics as a design agency. Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the users) seem to have ended up with is a fussy and unelegent logo that has nothing to do with anythin, save for a pair of post-modern ice cream cones harking back to beastie. The simple fact is, when you look at the new logo it only makes sense if you previously understand what it represents. The effect is that it represents nothing in particular, which is why it fails so fantasically. What are the key values of FreeBSD? I'd guess something like Freedom, Stability, Robustness, quality. Those values are not communicated in the new logo, and I think that's something that somebody with freebsd.org in their email address should seriously address. kep From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:57:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0D816A411 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@coastcable.com) Received: from mx.dccnet.com (mx.dccnet.com [24.207.1.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FFF43D53 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:57:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@coastcable.com) Received: from [192.168.148.3] (unverified [24.207.90.218]) by mx.dccnet.com (DCCNet Email Cluster4) with ESMTP id 7469310 for multiple; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:57:07 -0700 Message-ID: <4461F10D.9030002@coastcable.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 06:56:29 -0700 From: "Kevin G. Eliuk" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060504) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cblasius References: <44619F69.4000208@o2.pl> In-Reply-To: <44619F69.4000208@o2.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enable plugin nppdf.so in firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:57:21 -0000 cblasius wrote: > > [john@machina ~]$ firefox > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ > ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/ > intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined symbol "XtCalloc"] > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-mozilla/ > plugins/nphelix.so [Shared object "libm.so.6" not found, > required by "nphelix.so"] When I did my last update using portmanager I had to make some symbolic links to existing libraries to avert error messages such as /lib/libm.so.6 -> /lib/libm.so.3 and that seemed to fix the problem. I am also experiencing some problem with Linux-realplayer-10 and it's willingness to register with firefox to play rm,ram,rv,mp3,ogg,wav. etc.. The only thing it registers is rpm. Cheers, Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:00:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C522916A4C9 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1027E43D77 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:00:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([70.39.69.56]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060510140000.LWNL8718.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:00:00 -0400 From: "fbsd" To: "Jerry McAllister" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:59:59 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200605101324.k4ADOf5s015995@clunix.cl.msu.edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: Beech Rintoul , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt , "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:00:12 -0000 The point being it was not announced on the questions list. The point being the logo affects all the users just not the core committers. Quite trying to make a non-subject out of something that effects us all. The official logo represents all of us users to the world as a whole. Cant you get that through your collectives heads. How dare you be little this subject. Maybe you are to close to the internal FreeBSD business to be able to see the turn meaning of what changing the logo means to the users. Maybe now is the time to ask the list if that want to vote on keeping the new logo? Or on if a new logo is wanted at all? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jerry McAllister Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:25 AM To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Beech Rintoul; Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > As a long time reader of this list I did not see any > announcement of it here. Only after selection of the > new logo was made was it talked about on this list. > People were very up set with it them and the ground > swell over this has only gotten bigger. It was clearly announced with dates and how to make submissions and all and then the closure of the submissions was announced. There was a lot of griping on the list about why bother and such, but not much real objection until the robo-beastie - or would it be space-beastie - was chosen. Though I am not fond of the new thing, it is not because the process of acquiring it was not announced. I do think there was a failure to get better input on the candidates after submissions were made. The process, or lack thereof, of selecting was rather lame. > Loyal long time users are feeling insulted about being > left out from the decision about the need for a new logo. They were not left out, except by their own choice of not making any submission. > A post in the archive give some lame reasons for a new logo > which many people disagreed with even then but still the > new legal FreeBSD foundation went ahead any how putting it > on the official website removing the "beastie" logo. > > I for one do not see any need to change the logo at all. > It's just as professional as the "penguin". > > I would say special effort was made to keep this whole > new logo thing a secret from the general user population. Nope, it was well publicized. > That also goes for the formation of the new legal FreeBSD > foundation. > Not a word of it happening on this list until it was a done deal. > You can see from this thread just how big a stink this is making. Many words were posted. > Lets point the finger at the real reason for the new logo. > As part of the new legal FreeBSD foundation, the people who > set it up though it's better to own the complete legal rights > to the logo. The "beastie" logo legal rights is owned by > an individual. So being pressed for time they choose to keep it > off the questions list and pushed it through selecting what > ever logo they had just to meet the filing dead line for > the new legal FreeBSD foundation formation. Maybe, who knows. > > For those of you who think this subject is flame bait, > YOU ARE WHY THIS NEW LOGO IDEA WAS EVEN ABLE TO GET OFF > THE GROUND IN THE FIRST PLACE. > > Sham on you, shut your pie hole. That was unnecessary and adds nothing to the discussion. > I want to know the email addresses of the people in control of > the new foundation and everyone on this list who does not like > the new logo and/or the way in which it was forced upon us > should email them to voice our dissatisfaction directly to them. > Because its obvious posting on this list has no effect or value > in determining what happens to the legal FreeBSD organization > and thus the logo used to represent us. > If you want your voice in this matter to be effective you have > to email those in legal control of the FreeBSD foundation. > It's time they stop hiding and become accountable for > their stupid collective actions. Use whatever logo you want. Give up trash talking. > Its time the FreeBSD foundation offer an binding vote by the general > user population from all the FreeBSD lists to settle this question > once and for all about the "beastie" logo being the > official FreeBSD foundation logo. This even includes our brothers > and sisters in other countries who have their own FreeBSD.org > websites and don't even know about this logo problem yet. There never has been a binding vote on anything outside of possibly the core group. Why would a dumb piece of graphics need it. You are missing something. ////jerry _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:04:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077AC16A42F for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc3910@pcisys.net) Received: from ampex.com (postal.ampex.com [65.201.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E42F43D6E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:04:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc3910@pcisys.net) Received: from newman.ampex.com (newman.ampex.com [136.185.151.32]) by ampex.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4AE3hVi017183 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (cos-pc-143 [136.185.151.143]) by newman.ampex.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4AE3gIn004102 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:03:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4461F2BA.8080904@pcisys.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:03:38 -0600 From: Bryan Curl User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 3, autolearn=not spam) Subject: 6.1_RELEASE / mergemaster error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:04:49 -0000 I humbly apologize if this is a repost. Googles Gmail has been very unpredictable lately, so in frustration I am resending this from my ol' faithful ISP mailbox since last nights post never seemed to make it to the list. I am upgrading from 6.1_RC (something like that) to 6.1_RELEASE using CVSUp & RELENG_6.1 tag After make installworld I ran the final run through of mergemaster and received this error: ERROR CODE 64 FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'dc' into /usr/src/etc/ and install files to the temproot environment. Cant say how far it got before this error but it looked like it was going along pretty good. Upon reboot there were at least one system files missing, like hosts. I'm not sure if other files failed to copy on as well. I was in single user mode and did the fsck and mounts as described in the manual. I chmod 777 on that directory but that did not help. Also noticed samba did not start from rc.conf although it loads and runs from the prompt. But these may or may not be a symptom of the error. Should I be concerned about this? How I fix and move on? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:14:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB33216A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:14:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C254C43D55 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:14:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (AUTH: PLAIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:14:31 -0400 id 00056407.4461F547.00005EE6 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:14:21 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Kep Woof" Message-Id: <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:14:33 -0000 On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:20 +0000 "Kep Woof" wrote: [snip] > Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It > means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the > users) seem to have ended up with is a fussy and unelegent logo that > has nothing to do with anythin, save for a pair of post-modern ice > cream cones harking back to beastie. My brother went to school for graphic arts. When the contest was announced, we spend _several_weeks_ brainstorming, he and I, trying to come up with something that looked as cool as the NetBSD logo, while representing FreeBSD. We finally gave up without making a submission. The problem is that NetBSD (and OpenBSD as well, for that matter) somehow have more culture to them on the graphic arts side. NetBSD has long had the image of daemons raising the flag (mirroring the WWII photograph) which translated nicely into a logo. OpenBSD has long had the Blowfish, which can be rendered a number of interesting ways. And FreeBSD has what? The Beastie ... but the Beastie is *BSD in general, so what else is there ... ? > The simple fact is, when you look at the new logo it only makes sense > if you previously understand what it represents. The effect is that > it represents nothing in particular, which is why it fails so > fantasically. What are the key values of FreeBSD? I'd guess > something like Freedom, Stability, Robustness, quality. Those values > are not communicated in the new logo, and I think that's something > that somebody with freebsd.org in their email address should seriously > address. You're exactly right. Somebody other than you should take care of this. This is everyone's fault but yours. If you'd been in the loop from the start, this never would have happened. My goodness, why didn't we consult you earlier ... you obviously have all the answers. This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it yourself. If you can't fix it, _ask_ someone else, or put up some cash to pay someone who can. But quit whining. You are a Troll. If you weren't a Troll, you'd have taken this to chat@freebsd.org or advocacy@freebsd.org instead of staying on this list. Go use Microsoft, they pay professional graphic artists big bucks to design their logos and their marketing materials, and you fund that with your Windows license fees. Or, _contribute_ something back to the wonderful free software community other than a lengthy email thread of whining. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:16:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165C616A410 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5DB743D73 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:15:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 25662 invoked by uid 89); 10 May 2006 14:15:59 -0000 Received: from 204-8-12-66.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@204.8.12.66) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 10 May 2006 14:15:59 -0000 Message-ID: <4461F57D.502@pixelhammer.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:15:25 -0400 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:16:02 -0000 fbsd wrote: > As a long time reader of this list I did not see any > announcement of it here. Only after selection of the > new logo was made was it talked about on this list. > People were very up set with it them and the ground > swell over this has only gotten bigger. http://pixelhammer.com/aw_jeez.jpg This has gone too far. Searching shows that the FreeBSD questions list had mention of this over a year ago. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-questions/2005-February/076063.html To be blunt about it, you and everyone else had their chance. My wife, a designer, knew FreeBSD had a logo contest and she wouldn't know FreeBSD from a martian if it were not for my T-shirt. Anyone could have contributed. But like beta testing, most simply ignored the request to participate, preferring to wait until someone else did the hard work and made the tough decisions, then chose to bitch when the result was not want they wanted. It's apathy. Yea, I'm more than annoyed and this has been a long time coming. How many people actually keep a development server running just to help open source developers test patches or updates, even when those patches and updates do not affect them? How many donate to the souls who write the tools we use every day? Or do they just read the maillists when they need help, never offering to help others, and then get an attitude when the help they request doesn't arrive? A lot. I constantly dog my employers to donate, let me have work time to help out on lists, purchase the books (Mailscanner and Rails) that help the developers, keep a development box for testing. They complain even though they could not compete in the market place had they been required to purchase licenses for all the software they use. The Internet is the industry that open source built, and it has created a society of hand out junkies who think they should get everything their way, for free, right now. This job isn't fun anymore. DAve -- This message was checked by forty monkeys and found to not contain any SPAM whatsoever. Your monkeys may vary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:25:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B5B16A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A831043D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:25:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([70.39.69.56]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060510142533.OGIG8718.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:25:33 -0400 From: "fbsd" To: "Nick Withers" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:25:32 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060510223724.59bc096a.nick@nickwithers.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: RE: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:25:34 -0000 Thank you for making my point. This should have been announced on all lists. Just not the announcement list. Changing the logo is really a big thing. See the outcome of the short sightedness of that decision. And why should just the core committers be the only ones given a vote. Most of them are too busy to even have been aware this was happening. Many professional logo design people never even knew about the contest to redesign the logo because it was not posted to the questions list where everyone reads. What makes you think that the announcement list gets even a fraction of the readers the questions list does. Hell the questinos list gets enought junk post all ready, what's the harm in posting such an inportment message to the list to begin with, not doing so makes no sense at all. Somebody messed up big time and now they have to deal with the results of their stupid mistakes. You core committer people have to break out of this private club mentality thing you all adhere to. The logo effects all users and as such we should have vote in the matter. What were you all thinking? This was a bad idea from the get go. Just because core committer have the ability to write high level code does not give them the right to thumb your collective noses at the rest of us users in the matter of needing a new logo. In moving to an new legal status by forming the FreeBSD foundation us users just look the other way just long as the software stays free of cost and no new legal restraints are imposed on the software use. But changing the logo effects all users and sham on you self righteous snobs to even think you have the right to exclude the user community from the logo decision. Get off your high horses and serve your users like your suppose to. I think the new logo should be shit canned and the whole question of replaceing the "beastie" logo brought up for a general vote bye all members of all the Freebsd mailing lists. Your negtave comments are foundless. A public vote is not an logistical near-impossibility. Hell just creating a special list to submit an email to as your yes or not vote is a simple solution and other solutions could be found one way or the other. If you are insulted by my comments then I guess you belong the self righteous snobs group and I dont care about you. This is address the the users who like me are out raged by this. If you dont like the new logo then lets make our combined voices make a differance by emailing the new foundation's forming members. -----Original Message----- From: Nick Withers [mailto:nick@nickwithers.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:37 AM To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:13:24 -0400 "fbsd" wrote: > As a long time reader of this list I did not see any > announcement of it here. That's because this is the freebsd-questions list. It was announced on the freebsd-announce list. Y'know, the one where announcements are made... > Only after selection of the new logo was made was it > talked about on this list People were very up set with it > them and the ground swell over this has only gotten bigger. Again, this is the freebsd-questions list. I don't really think that this is actually the most appropriate place for discussion of such things (and therefore I should probably apologise for contributing to this lil' thread!). > Loyal long time users are feeling insulted about being > left out from the decision about the need for a new logo. > A post in the archive give some lame reasons for a new logo > which many people disagreed with even then but still the > new legal FreeBSD foundation went ahead any how put it > on the official website. > > I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all. Perhaps not, but then again, this is why there's a core team to make decisions for the project. Granted they're not elected by every user who's ever heard the word "FreeBSD", but I can't even begin to imagine the logistical near-impossibility this would be. Committers were given the chance to vote, and voted for the new design (again, see http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/, which also has a link to the archived original announcement to freebsd-announce). > I would say special effort was made to keep this whole > new logo thing a secret from the general user population. See above, it was announced very publically on the freebsd-announce list. (snip) > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > jad@nominet.org.uk > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:48 AM > To: Kep Woof > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org > > > owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17: > > > hi, > > > > On 5/9/06, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > Then take this to chat@freebsd.org. It's just flame bait here. > > > > I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we > ended > > up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think it's a big > joke? > > The new logo already looks dated, and will only get worse with > time. > > > > This happened ages ago and was announced in the news section of the > website > > See - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ > > John > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Nick Withers email: nick@nickwithers.com Web: http://www.nickwithers.com Mobile: +61 414 397 446 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:27:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40F716A417 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:27:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4184A43DA1 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:27:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k4AEJY89016207; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:19:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k4AEJYCQ016206; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:19:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200605101419.k4AEJYCQ016206@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: draculawizard@earthlink.net Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:19:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1902670.1147233030936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about putty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:27:56 -0000 > > i have a question about putty after i log in to my putty.exe and i want > to go add oper but after when i login with my password and login name > what do i need to type after please emailed me back thanks I guess, I don't really understand what you are asking. Where are you adding 'oper'? Is it on a FreeBSD system or do you mean to give that name to a connection configuration within PuTTY? If you want to create a new user named 'oper' on a FreeBSD you need to study creating new user accounts on FreeBSD. Check the FreeBSD handbook on the FreeBSD website or get one of the good books on FreeBSD. If you mean to add a named connection under PuTTY configuration, just put the name in the window and click on save. If you mean something else, you will have to explain with more detail. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:28:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A93716A443 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBFB43D5A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:28:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([70.39.69.56]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060510142835.SKIH9009.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:28:35 -0400 From: "fbsd" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:28:34 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 6.1 is now available for download X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:28:38 -0000 This is just a short note to inform all the list readers that 6.1 is available. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:34:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A14116A439 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richard@firebadger.net) Received: from mail.firebadger.net (82-69-4-157.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.4.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 620E643D6D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:34:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@firebadger.net) Received: (qmail 44138 invoked by uid 1011); 10 May 2006 14:36:57 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.10 by brian.firebadger.net (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88.1/1449. spamassassin: 3.1.1. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(192.168.1.10):SA:0(-4.4/5.0):. Processed in 0.707815 secs); 10 May 2006 14:36:57 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-FIREBADGER-Mail-From: richard@firebadger.net via brian.firebadger.net X-Antivirus-FIREBADGER: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(192.168.1.10):SA:0(-4.4/5.0):. Processed in 0.707815 secs Process 44130) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.10?) (richard@firebadger.net@192.168.1.10) by mail.firebadger.net with SMTP; 10 May 2006 14:36:56 -0000 Message-ID: <4461F9D4.20009@firebadger.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:33:56 +0100 From: Richard Collyer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:34:17 -0000 fbsd wrote: > Thank you for making my point. > This should have been announced on all lists. > Just not the announcement list. > Changing the logo is really a big thing. Yes. But the point of having a announce list is so that important announcements are not jumbled in with lots of "where can I download freebsd". Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing that I like for a screensaver? Regards, Richard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:37:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0025816A4D3 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61B743D6A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:37:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1733131nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:37:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qBFIimuPdZKMwRTsxnIyQMvB2c8sVlTDz84zrAdG9IXMfMNbt72yucVvSbnIl2Obpg7dKy2zCrRM4gqan09SaQoSr+oQvD/8LQiFwsPSvNeY5dVExtSNCY/dwhT4bch5STu8DwusEKX7DZV0cvnc7s19hKTkS4MIuWcVHid9Zck= Received: by 10.65.59.12 with SMTP id m12mr421199qbk; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.107.14 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0028260605100737t52670e55yea6b3ddccb7112b5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:37:26 +0100 From: "Jeff Rollin" To: "Beech Rintoul" In-Reply-To: <200605100208.38485.beech@alaskaparadise.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200605100208.38485.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:37:29 -0000 > > > > Ted > > The most interesting time I've had with beastie was setting up servers an= d > a > website for a Baptist org here in Alaska. I put beastie on the site > thinking > it would never be approved. They were seeking donations and were very > sensitive about the site's image. Not only did the clergy approve the sit= e > with the "powered by" logo, they thought beastie was "cute". Well, as we're on a religious theme, Thank God for common sense. How many religious people worldwide even HAVE devils in their religion, I wonder. Even after several irate emails about displaying the "devil" on a church > site, > the logo remained. It was decided that several narrow minded people did > not > warrant removing it. I didn't even have to explain what a daemon is. Again, amen. Do we really want narrow-minded people in our community? Does anyone? Several months later the site won an award at one of their national > conventions. The plaque featured a screen shot of the front page complete > with beastie! That's devilishly good news, If people are refraining from using FreeBSD because of beastie (which I > don't > believe), they really need to just grow up. Hear, hear If the Baptists don't have any > problem with him, I can't imagine anyone else objecting. I can, but then as you say, they need to grow up. Jeff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:44:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B577A16A498 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E5743D6B for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:44:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kep.woof@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1734689nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:44:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YpY7R9h2IqVHCeKs1VbfZD04S1LcGJKmL1rAPwKT2vEcjPmYgXHNlROiuKvu5MZfJMDnsuzum0K2yvpxbAiF7bxC+j59exCV2wpLJCdzYawTQx+ub7+Be3+WGP+g15tGxCjOEJk4utnchXVImsebiAM9WgzK+KloXQE5L2zAaHI= Received: by 10.65.183.2 with SMTP id k2mr429654qbp; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.180.8 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9c8168780605100744n62b20da1mfe065d9a6292f7a8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:44:03 +0000 From: "Kep Woof" To: "Bill Moran" In-Reply-To: <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:44:16 -0000 Hi, On 5/10/06, Bill Moran wrote: > You're exactly right. Somebody other than you should take care of this. I'm trying to understand what has happened and why. I'm trying to take care of this, and you, with your accusations and vitriol are'nt helping. I want to understand the process by which the logo was chosen so I may influence future decisions. > This is everyone's fault but yours. If you'd been in the loop from the > start, this never would have happened. My goodness, why didn't we > consult you earlier ... you obviously have all the answers. Excuse me? Now this is clearly flame baiting. > This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it > yourself. What is the procedure to fix a logo? A logo doesn't work the same as a piece of source code, which is why commiters shouldn't have been the only people with an opinion that counts. It's the users that use the software. We're an essential part of the community, we buy cd's, show our friends, retire windows boxes here and there. The logo is our badge, and anyone that's ever been to a convention knows that. > If you can't fix it, _ask_ someone else, or put up some > cash to pay someone who can. I can't help but think that cash has little to do with this. I'm sure between us we could raise a few thousand dollars for someone to design a proper logo, but i'm sure it's not as simple as that. > But quit whining. I'm not whining, I'm trying to understand. > You are a Troll. If you weren't a Troll, you'd have taken this to > chat@freebsd.org or advocacy@freebsd.org instead of staying on this > list. I'm not a troll. It seems like a rather convenient way to silence someone to me. Is my question advocacy related? I don't think so.=20 It has a much wider scope than that. > Go use Microsoft, they pay professional graphic artists big bucks to > design their logos and their marketing materials, and you fund that > with your Windows license fees. How is that related or helpful? > Or, _contribute_ something back to the wonderful free software > community other than a lengthy email thread of whining. I'm trying to, but it has to start somewhere. I'm trying to understand how the logo was chosen, and why. It would seem to have far greater ramifications than you think. kep From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 14:53:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154CE16A47E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:53:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDC343D5E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:53:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([70.39.69.56]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060510145315.QPTQ8718.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:53:15 -0400 From: "fbsd" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:53:15 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: board@freebsdfoundation.org Subject: vote for keeping "beastie" as official logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:53:18 -0000 If you are as dissatisfied with the new official logo as I am, then forward this email to the FreeBSD federation board of directors at board@freebsdfoundation.org Dear FreeBSD federation board of directors: I am upset with the manner in which it was decided that a new logo was needed. Only posting a message that this was happening on the announcement list was an big mistake as it left out the users who promote FreeBSD at the grass roots level from knowing about it. An change of this magnitude should have been broadcast to all lists to get the widest based input possible. I sincerely hope this deception was not on purpose as it looks that way. Furthermore the new logo design is not satisfactory and does not represent the wants of the user community as shown by the multiple posts on the questions list of late. My vote is for keeping the beastie image as the official FreeBSD logo and removing the sex toy logo from publication. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:00:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF2F16A487 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785D343D53 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:00:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (AUTH: PLAIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:00:11 -0400 id 00056407.4461FFFB.000062BD Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:00:11 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Kep Woof" Message-Id: <20060510110011.e317d5b5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605100744n62b20da1mfe065d9a6292f7a8@mail.gmail.com> References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <9c8168780605100744n62b20da1mfe065d9a6292f7a8@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: "Anatomy of a Troll" by Bill Moran X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:00:15 -0000 Notice how the following was snipped out of the reply: "The simple fact is, when you look at the new logo it only makes sense if you previously understand what it represents. The effect is that it represents nothing in particular, which is why it fails so fantasically. What are the key values of FreeBSD? I'd guess something like Freedom, Stability, Robustness, quality. Those values are not communicated in the new logo, and I think that's something that somebody with freebsd.org in their email address should seriously address." Now, the following quote by me was in direct response to this: "You're exactly right. Somebody other than you should take care of this." I think my reply makes perfect sense when viewed with Kep's statement. However, Kep then goes on to _remove_ the words he said, and then claim that he said something different - as shown below: "> I'm trying to understand what has happened and why. I'm trying to > take care of this, and you, with your accusations and vitriol are'nt > helping. I want to understand the process by which the logo was > chosen so I may influence future decisions." I'm uncertain as to how claiming that "somebody with freebsd.org in their email address" should fix it does _not_ constitute "Somebody other than you should take care of this" So, note well the feeding habits of the Troll. He tricks his prey by making inflammatory statements, then attempts to escape by pretending those statements were never made. There are other examples of this "Inflame then dodge" technique in this thread. I'll leave their discovery as an exercise to the reader. How many can _you_ find? -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:03:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8642016A487 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC28943D58 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:03:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4AF3CLj092863; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:03:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <446200A8.9020901@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:03:04 -0500 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:03:24 -0000 fbsd wrote: > The point being it was not announced on the questions list. Non-technical announcements are not in the questions@ charter. > The point being the logo affects all the users just not the core > committers. And it affects you in exactly the same way as thousands of other choices made by core without your explicit involvement or approval. Love the new feature and use it, or, don't use it. It's real simple. Why don't the complainers on this subject seem to understand that they are in no way compelled to adopt, deploy, endorse or enjoy the project logo? Use Beastie if you like, there is absolutely no one telling you that you can't (except, um, its copyright holder). > Quite trying to make a non-subject out of something that effects us > all. Quit using question@ as a beauty contest / "user rights" forum, please. It *is* far OT, especially since there are other forums specifically for such subject matter. The logo issue is a horse that has been solidly beaten to death, raised as a zombie, chased with torches and pitchforks, burnt to crispiness, buried and then (surprise!) brought to life again this week for another 1,001 rounds of beating and flaming. Tiresome, really. No one is belittling the subject, only pointing out that it's both OT and done with. The appearance of the logo on the Web site is not a beginning, it's a finality. If you want to hack and burn the undead, go play Oblivion. ;) > Maybe now is the time to ask the list if that want to vote on > keeping the new logo? Or on if a new logo is wanted at all? Wrong forum, years too late. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:09:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCD216A4C1 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:09:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B440643D5D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:08:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1741102nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fY3KyrQDKmN/3ZJS8z2HAaEPZjon7PIc4BACYVSw6UmLTzoItV54TbSEtu3dwZdmUZnjb5K56tsP/hR0AqZ7s0A9iGoT9H+hEyD0rlrewfrNyQz+LYjaj8MoEJD2r8GsgojfBhfdEJOFubv0blk/q2yndsZle74z3OXeuhazYQE= Received: by 10.65.59.18 with SMTP id m18mr456928qbk; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.107.14 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0028260605100808i42649810n5864832886298763@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:08:58 +0100 From: "Jeff Rollin" To: "Beech Rintoul" In-Reply-To: <8a0028260605100737t52670e55yea6b3ddccb7112b5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200605100208.38485.beech@alaskaparadise.com> <8a0028260605100737t52670e55yea6b3ddccb7112b5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:09:11 -0000 I'm going to put my 2 cents (or at the current conversion rate, 1 (British) penny!) in here, I think. I consider myself a new FreeBSD user. I have used it before (around 4.8), but never really did much with it. I find that I don't very often dual boot OSes, so I've had nothing but Gentoo on my desktop till now. I finally decided to put FreeBSD 6.0 on my laptop, alongside SuSE, and give it a try. I don't expect to have a "vote" on whether the FreeBSD logo is any good or not. But I can still express an opinion. I'm here to tell you that Beastie has recognition from outside the communit= y as well. That's what logos are for. We in the BSD community, new members as well as old, know who we are. As I said, I did not vote on the new logo business, but if I did, I would have said no. Why didn't I? Well it wasn't because I agreed with it, or because I didn't know about it. I simply didn't consider that I had a right to vote, given that at the time I wasn't even using FreeBSD. People can, and do, use the FreeBSD logo to spread awareness of the OS. That is a good thing. I take th= e view FreeBSD is intimately connected with Beastie. If the "corporate" and "religious fundie" arguments hold water, then why is Beastie still the FreeBSD mascot? I disagreed because, apart from not seeing the point of pandering to a few religious fundies (and those among you who object to such a characterisatio= n should know that I consider myself pretty religious, too, just not a fundie), as I said, Beastie has brand recognition. Sometimes, it's true, yo= u just HAVE to bite the bullet and get a new brand, but there's no point doin= g it unless its absolutely necessary. I can't remember the last time I saw a different version of the IBM logo except on sites about IBM history. Why? Because people recognize it. It has the advantage of not being too closely identified with a particular era, of course, but so does Beastie. For another example of the same, I believe SONY will suffice. For a few years I've had THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 4.4BSD O.S. I= t has Beastie on the cover. I'd be more concerned about looking like a geek i= n synagogue if someone caught me there with it, than a Satanist. I think I'm justified in saying that Linux distributions are more widely accepted than probably all the BSD's put together, certainly in terms of brand recognition amongst the wider public. Having a penguin as the logo doesn't seem to have hurt, even when you consider that (for whatever reason), the root of Linus's fondness for penguins comes from being bitten by one. When ST:TOS came out, the production co. wanted to drop Spock because they thought his appearance was too "devilish", despite the fact that in the first (pilot) episode, he *even smiled*. Needless to say, Roddenberry (sp?) stuck to his guns and today Spock is one of the best-loved ST characters, known even outside the Star Trek fan community. I'm sure a few religious fundies still probably object to him (have they found a passage in Leviticu= s implying "God hates aliens/logic" yet?). My question to you is this: Who amongst the fanbase, the wider public, or a= t Paramount gives a damn? Turned into more like my 2 pounds, but there we go. Yours, Jeff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:11:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED6616A43A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FCE43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:11:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from mail.dfwlp.com (localhost.int.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4AFBLoK012984 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:11:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from 167.246.36.14 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by mail.dfwlp.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:11:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <48714.167.246.36.14.1147273881.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:11:21 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: vote for keeping "beastie" as official logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:11:28 -0000 > > If you are as dissatisfied with the new official logo > as I am, then forward this email to the FreeBSD federation > board of directors at board@freebsdfoundation.org > > Dear FreeBSD federation board of directors: > > I am upset with the manner in which it was decided > that a new logo was needed. > > Only posting a message that this was happening on the > announcement list was an big mistake as it left out > the users who promote FreeBSD at the grass roots > level from knowing about it. An change of this > magnitude should have been broadcast to all lists > to get the widest based input possible. > > I sincerely hope this deception was not on > purpose as it looks that way. > > Furthermore the new logo design is not satisfactory > and does not represent the wants of the user community > as shown by the multiple posts on the questions > list of late. > > > My vote is for keeping the beastie image as the > official FreeBSD logo and removing the sex toy > logo from publication. > > > you should also note in this letter, that it only applies to people who dont read a minimum of "slashdot". *wink* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:12:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978FB16A411 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A482043D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:12:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1741842nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=WJjJfuKOFcEaj9weELdJSsWz3cZ3akwGKL/UaJf6pSJoCgh2Iv8Tnr6Y16Y3pOmPc9LsR8uqcsX848AXFdJQv5Ck3ZCWZUV55hKvrSrZSqKpATvzhlec2YlIVafbWsWfB43/vZaN8qzIVbJKwJlE7vIdHJSO+cOy2oP+e5LHGFE= Received: by 10.65.137.17 with SMTP id p17mr460852qbn; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.107.14 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0028260605100812t7b1eb854g41cae108723f6d5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:12:07 +0100 From: "Jeff Rollin" To: "Bill Moran" In-Reply-To: <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:12:08 -0000 > > Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It > > means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the > > users) seem to have ended up with is a fussy and unelegent logo that > > has nothing to do with anythin, save for a pair of post-modern ice > > cream cones harking back to beastie. > > My brother went to school for graphic arts. When the contest was > announced, we spend _several_weeks_ brainstorming, he and I, trying > to come up with something that looked as cool as the NetBSD logo, while > representing FreeBSD. The NetBSD sucks too, imao-fyi. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:29:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3EB16A48C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:29:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BC143D70 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:28:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (83.253.29.241) by pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.072.1) id 44609CD600062028 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:28:55 +0200 Received: (qmail 59380 invoked from network); 10 May 2006 17:28:55 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 10 May 2006 17:28:55 +0200 Received: (qmail 53458 invoked by uid 1001); 10 May 2006 17:28:55 +0200 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:28:55 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: fbsd Message-ID: <20060510152854.GA53391@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: fbsd , Nick Withers , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" References: <20060510223724.59bc096a.nick@nickwithers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" , Nick Withers Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:29:04 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:25:32AM -0400, fbsd wrote: > Thank you for making my point. > This should have been announced on all lists. > Just not the announcement list. Wrong. That is exactly what the announcment list is for. > Changing the logo is really a big thing. Not really. > > See the outcome of the short sightedness of that decision. Yeah, we get lots of whining people like yourself wasting bandwidth. > > And why should just the core committers be > the only ones given a vote. Since they are the ones doing most of the job, it seems like a reasonable place to draw the line. > Most of them are too busy to even have been > aware this was happening. Really? > > Many professional logo design people never even knew about > the contest to redesign the logo because it was not posted > to the questions list where everyone reads. Not everyone reads the questions list. Heck, not even all the developers do, due to the low signal/noise ratio here. > > What makes you think that the announcement list gets even > a fraction of the readers the questions list does. The fact that it is a much more important list to read. If you only read one freebsd.org mailing list it should be announce@ since that is where all important announcments are made (including security advisories.) > > Hell the questinos list gets enought junk post all ready, Yes, but that does not mean you have to provide even more evidence of that. > what's the harm in posting such an inportment message to the > list to begin with, not doing so makes no sense at all. > > Somebody messed up big time and now they have to deal with the > results of their stupid mistakes. > > You core committer people have to break out of this > private club mentality thing you all adhere to. > > The logo effects all users and as such we should have vote in the > matter. Bullshit. > What were you all thinking? This was a bad idea from the get go. > > > Just because core committer have the ability to write high level > code > does not give them the right to thumb your collective noses > at the rest of us users in the matter of needing a new logo. > > In moving to an new legal status by forming the FreeBSD > foundation us users just look the other way just long as > the software stays free of cost and no new legal restraints > are imposed on the software use. > > But changing the logo effects all users and sham on you > self righteous snobs to even think you have the right to > exclude the user community from the logo decision. > > Get off your high horses and serve your users like your suppose to. You seem to be under the misapprehension that the developers have any obligations to you. That is not the case. > > > I think the new logo should be shit canned and the whole > question of replaceing the "beastie" logo brought up for > a general vote bye all members of all the Freebsd mailing lists. And I think you should stop whining about the logo and do something useful instead. > > Your negtave comments are foundless. Much like your allegations then? > > A public vote is not an logistical near-impossibility. > Hell just creating a special list to submit an email > to as your yes or not vote is a simple solution and other > solutions could be found one way or the other. > > If you are insulted by my comments then I guess you > belong the self righteous snobs group and I dont care about you. > > This is address the the users who like me are out raged by this. > > If you dont like the new logo then lets make our combined voices > make a differance by emailing the new foundation's forming members. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Withers [mailto:nick@nickwithers.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:37 AM > To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com > Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org > > > On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:13:24 -0400 > "fbsd" wrote: > > > As a long time reader of this list I did not see any > > announcement of it here. > > That's because this is the freebsd-questions list. It was > announced on the freebsd-announce list. Y'know, the one where > announcements are made... > > > Only after selection of the new logo was made was it > > talked about on this list People were very up set with it > > them and the ground swell over this has only gotten bigger. > > Again, this is the freebsd-questions list. I don't really think > that this is actually the most appropriate place for discussion > of such things (and therefore I should probably apologise for > contributing to this lil' thread!). > > > Loyal long time users are feeling insulted about being > > left out from the decision about the need for a new logo. > > A post in the archive give some lame reasons for a new logo > > which many people disagreed with even then but still the > > new legal FreeBSD foundation went ahead any how put it > > on the official website. > > > > I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all. > > Perhaps not, but then again, this is why there's a core team to > make decisions for the project. Granted they're not elected by > every user who's ever heard the word "FreeBSD", but I can't > even begin to imagine the logistical near-impossibility this > would be. > > Committers were given the chance to vote, and voted for the new > design (again, see http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/, > which also has a link to the archived original announcement > to freebsd-announce). > > > I would say special effort was made to keep this whole > > new logo thing a secret from the general user population. > > See above, it was announced very publically on the > freebsd-announce list. > > (snip) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > > jad@nominet.org.uk > > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:48 AM > > To: Kep Woof > > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org > > > > > > owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17: > > > > > hi, > > > > > > On 5/9/06, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > > > Then take this to chat@freebsd.org. It's just flame bait > here. > > > > > > I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we > > ended > > > up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think it's a big > > joke? > > > The new logo already looks dated, and will only get worse with > > time. > > > > > > > This happened ages ago and was announced in the news section of > the > > website > > > > See - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ > > > > John > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- > Nick Withers > email: nick@nickwithers.com > Web: http://www.nickwithers.com > Mobile: +61 414 397 446 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:32:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A5916A598 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAA843D8A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:31:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ200HG934WLS90@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:31:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([80.203.212.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ200C4U34VWVS0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:31:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:31:45 +0200 From: Kyrre Nygard To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510172936.021f1e30@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cc: Subject: pam_userdb.so: Where is it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:32:10 -0000 Hello! Does anybody know where pam_userdb.so has gone? Linux has it, but apparently FreeBSD does not. I need it to set up virtual users with vsftpd. I've been in contact with others with the same problem: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-November/104571.html As well as Freenode #vsftpd. But nobody seems to know what the PAM module for Berkeley DB files is at. Or perhaps somebody can suggest alternate methods? Thanks, Kyrre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:42:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C6716A726 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A564943D6D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:42:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1749566nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:42:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Ttk9YV/ZxQTZJ0+/cVGLB949Vt8fviRa+Su1zOOor/MPmVL2euTvUc2Jd2EiHaKdFxi0qZXfxRb5mjVRosss8DiDo7svbMkBNayhCzvweGZz8coCaUR+dBQOuK09chFUIJH6a1s3byPLkR1FG1RMeOkNKqiiOJFaVkTmFvOvZ94= Received: by 10.65.222.9 with SMTP id z9mr488360qbq; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.107.14 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0028260605100842m41014b45r6c5f8600c5955d0e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:42:10 +0100 From: "Jeff Rollin" To: "Richard Collyer" In-Reply-To: <4461F9D4.20009@firebadger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4461F9D4.20009@firebadger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:42:19 -0000 > > Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an > IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing > that I like for a screensaver? I think it's a bigger problem than that. When was the last time Steve Ballmer responded to a complaint that his shiny new elephant d*ck screensaver crashed the system with the words "Go fuck yourself"? That's th= e kind of response some who claim to be high-ups in the FreeBSD community are giving here. That kind of attitude helps no one, least of all FreeBSD's reputation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:42:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C005316A528 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0484643D90 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:42:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC051A4DD6; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 451E551601; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:42:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:42:57 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Valerio daelli Message-ID: <20060510154256.GA30539@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <27dbfc8c0605100554v377be7ffpb19a5163349c7f17@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27dbfc8c0605100554v377be7ffpb19a5163349c7f17@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question on NFS performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:43:01 -0000 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:54:39PM +0200, Valerio daelli wrote: > Hi all > we have a FreeBSD 5.4 exporting some NFS filesystem to a cluster of gento= o=20 > boxes > (kernel 2.6.12). > Our exported storage disk is an Apple XRaid. > We have Gigabit Ethernet both on the client and the server. > We would like to improve our read performance. > This is our performance: >=20 > about 10Mb reading a file of 1Gb with dd >=20 > and iozone confirms this result. > We already use the normal optimization flags (we use rpc.lockd and > rpc.statd, on the client we have > read size 65536 and a read ahead of 4 blocks, the async options). > Is our performance the best we can get? Can we improve it? "5.4" and "filesystem performance" cannot be said together in the same sentence. Upgrade to 6.1. Kris --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYgoAWry0BWjoQKURAk6KAKCXlqghF4ABZzxJGCjfqpt6TQTSaACg8PYj r0ovR764kkxrkiQAi/aA6ZE= =H9Oy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:49:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0B916A40D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4C343D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:49:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so91624uge for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:49:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DIqYtR4piQ5Axxl9lHwGh9E4mL/nTd+wV0szHCGBAGeFLPRzARv8vBa0V/zdwCF3pW/A5SgC/dxPGMGR9zs0uPjG550pbMHpwAiW5SAg1mYAV+lHrIKb2pQV0C7RMW4gNpnJ5XKIdxn4GEYqBauREBMx3rMnLkT72f5wxCGZ3FY= Received: by 10.78.17.4 with SMTP id 4mr151807huq; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605100824w19cb4145k9df5829bba4acf1e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:24:47 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: oliverrojo@anticogroup.com In-Reply-To: <4461B5DC.2010808@anticogroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4461B5DC.2010808@anticogroup.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: transparent proxy with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:49:18 -0000 You can safely use any doc about transparent squid + linux.. Only the syntax of PF is different.But there is an example in openbsd.org/faq/pf For ipfilter use the appropriate man page.. On 5/10/06, Oliver A. Rojo wrote: > > Is there any docs on setting up transparent proxy using squid, ipf, > ipnat + freebsd-5.3? > > -- > > > Oliver A. Rojo > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential > and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error > please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or > opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author > and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, > the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the > presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any > damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:55:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CA216A402 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jedrek@t-n-p.org) Received: from larissa.t-n-p.org (host-87-74-63-100.bulldogdsl.com [87.74.63.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A0943D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:55:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jedrek@t-n-p.org) Received: by larissa.t-n-p.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1A1F91CC83; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:21:22 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:21:21 +0100 From: jedrek To: Kep Woof Message-ID: <20060510142121.GA60560@larissa.t-n-p.org> References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "jad@nominet.org.uk" Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:55:05 -0000 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > However, where were the other designs? =20 I was wondering about that myself... > Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. =20 Netbsd logo is very nice indeed. > The simple fact is, when you look at the new logo it only makes sense > if you previously understand what it represents. The effect is that > it represents nothing in particular, which is why it fails so > fantasically. What are the key values of FreeBSD? I'd guess > something like Freedom, Stability, Robustness, quality. Those values > are not communicated in the new logo, and I think that's something > that somebody with freebsd.org in their email address should seriously > address. Kep totally has a point here. Freebsd need's a logo that represents what the name stands for and the "sex toy" isn't it. =20 --=20 jedrek --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYfbhu9djjrPrx0YRAs08AJ4muSKE5/+zLXqy3+Y55oJCRHE+jACfaCxA Wx2Iops/UHe95ji9C3rYIFw= =wOVh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:00:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B67416A410 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AF743D4C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:00:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ200H164GSM4A0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:00:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([80.203.212.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ200DKP4GPJ4R0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:00:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:00:27 +0200 From: Kyrre Nygard In-reply-to: <8a0028260605100842m41014b45r6c5f8600c5955d0e@mail.gmail.co m> To: Jeff Rollin , Richard Collyer , Ted Mittelstaedt Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510175922.021fcd40@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <4461F9D4.20009@firebadger.net> <8a0028260605100842m41014b45r6c5f8600c5955d0e@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:00:30 -0000 At 17:42 10.05.2006, Jeff Rollin wrote: >>Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an >>IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing >>that I like for a screensaver? > > >I think it's a bigger problem than that. When was the last time Steve >Ballmer responded to a complaint that his shiny new elephant d*ck >screensaver crashed the system with the words "Go fuck yourself"? That's the >kind of response some who claim to be high-ups in the FreeBSD community are >giving here. > >That kind of attitude helps no one, least of all FreeBSD's reputation. Freeze! This is the BSDPD. Stop this shit immediately! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:06:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6249E16A52A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:06:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F00543D6D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:06:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so777101pye for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:06:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tKbCUua3oFE9uxQ+Ci4530qKU82b+vpWwy+venokmCiUqw6ywhKF4LyEQAkFGA0kttuYuLLRIfjK9y80KdL76jhqwf+2zt905dN2vcxyJZ64FTpTWnE06o4EEg1xO3av9HEhPwMKMmDftnQTgg8cJHfzC5RG/Rmm4AMOZVbyiF0= Received: by 10.35.8.1 with SMTP id l1mr1016498pyi; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.81.7 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:06:33 +0100 From: Freminlins To: "Kyrre Nygard" In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510172936.021f1e30@broadpark.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510172936.021f1e30@broadpark.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_userdb.so: Where is it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:06:37 -0000 Kyrre, On 5/10/06, Kyrre Nygard wrote: > > > Hello! > > Does anybody know where pam_userdb.so has gone? FreeBSD doesn't appear to have ever had it, so it hasn't "gone" anywhere. The thread you linked to below suggests exactly that. Linux has it, but apparently FreeBSD does not. > I need it to set up virtual users with vsftpd. > > I've been in contact with others with the same problem: > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-November/104571= .html > > As well as Freenode #vsftpd. > > But nobody seems to know what the PAM module for Berkeley DB files is at. > > Or perhaps somebody can suggest alternate methods? You could download the source ( http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/pam/Linux-PAM/modules/pam_userdb/) an= d try and build it. Thanks, > Kyrre > Frem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:12:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFA516A625 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9063843D5A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:12:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1756641nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:12:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=P/NDaHzAhCDLJT1ShxFMcmGsVndSCUs/p8I7msQUpB6rpVvXtBMPzNk9PgxOowITa/R2SV5Wl/+nyJAgARf+qWRBYaK6ZSFINXXKpAeUJxIswR3fQgScvy/50XyBZYwIrlnPk6RCOfowxZD9bp6QYa4XdoeCUjD3NXfBHiL8dpQ= Received: by 10.65.59.12 with SMTP id m12mr517119qbk; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:12:31 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: "cknipe@savage.za.org" In-Reply-To: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Torn between SCSI and SATA for RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:12:34 -0000 > > Another thing that I read that I'm not completely sure about. Some of th= e > Adaptec SCSI Cards advertises a max of 30 devices - some even more. Excu= se the > ignorance, but does the SCSI Bus not allow for a max of 8 devices? Do th= ese > cards then feature multiple buses to connect the cables to? If so, SATA = will > obviously not be able to provide something like this. I am not that familiar with SCSI protocols, but I imagine the Ultra-Wide SCSI bus can probably address 32 devices ( 31 drives + the controller ). > Now comes my question... Uhm.. Can SATA RAID Controllers be 'linked'. Sa= y, I > but 4 x 8-Port Adaptec SATA RAID Controllers... 2 x 8 Port Cards =3D 16 P= orts for > 1 RAID 5 Array (@ 750GB Drives, 12TB Max). The other 2 cards, to mirror.= I > know that I can use one Controller to mirror another, but can I extend a = array > across multiple controllers... And then naturally, just HOW much slower d= oes > the array function? I imagine you would probably have to use software raid at that point. And even if you would use two controllers togeather (SLI for RAID?) you would be limited by the PCI bus. > > I've seen some comments and posts (esp. on slashdot) made where people go= about > running massive arrays successfully on SATA. Given the limits on the Por= ts at > the controller, just how is this achieved? Probably with softawre RAID. With software RAID you can even mix drive types, like SATA, PATA, SCSI, USB, etc. But it's much slower. > Sorry that this is so OT, but I hope I'd get some good answers. This is > definately not something that's been discussed allot before considering t= he > amount of info I got after spending a number of days on google... > > -- > Chris. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:13:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D7F16A559 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:13:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB2F43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:13:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1FdrJw-000MmN-QJ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:13:52 -0600 In-Reply-To: <200605100041.23001.beech@alaskaparadise.com> References: <200605100041.23001.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:13:50 -0600 To: Beech Rintoul X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:13:54 -0000 On May 10, 2006, at 2:41 AM, Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Wednesday 10 May 2006 00:30, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: >> On May 10, 2006, at 2:25 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >>> He became a mascot only after the 'new-logo' people >>> started agitating for the sex-ball. Prior to that all the >>> literature referred to him as a logo, when the word logo was >>> used. (which wasn't often, but it was used) >>> >>> This is nothing more than an argument of appeasement and >>> has been explained before in this forum, please quit insulting >>> our intelligence. We all know that Beastie's place as the >>> logo has been supplanted, and your side won, and your crude >>> attempt to explain away Beastie is insulting. You won, be >>> content with that. >> >> Wow, Ted a top-poster! >> >> A professional evaluation of "beastie" showed he was not a logo and >> had served as a poor-one at that in his ersatz role as a wanna-be >> logo. (Note that I did not say that Beastie was poor but that he >> had served as a poor logo based on professional criteria of what >> makes a good logo). Beastie has his place. >> >> Chad > > That's all well and good, but I for one don't plan to replace the =20 > "powered by" > beastie logo on any of my sites with that sex-toy. It would be =20 > interesting to > see how many webmasters agree with me. We have had this out before. No one is asking you or forcing you to =20 replace any beastie you have anywhere. Can me move on? The post I =20 made was specifically in response to one from Ted where he made =20 claims about professional reviews of the new logo. For the record, the new logo doesn't impress me either. move along Chad > > Beech > > >> >>> Ted >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bj=F6rn =20= >>>> K=F6nig >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:35 PM >>>> To: Lawrence Horvath >>>> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo >>>> >>>> Lawrence Horvath schrieb: >>>>> I quite like the new logo, i think the new one is far more >>>>> professional then the old one, though i liked them both. >>>> >>>> I would say that there isn't an old one. Beastie is a little bit >>>> older >>>> than FreeBSD and I would understand it as mascot, not as a logo. >>>> So the >>>> new logo is not a replacement, but rather something that is >>>> missing for >>>> many years; and Beastie is still alive. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Bj=F6rn >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>>> -- >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>> Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/334 - Release Date: >>>> 5/8/2006 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> --- >> Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC >> Your Web App and Email hosting provider >> chad at shire.net >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > --=20 > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20= > ----------------- > Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com > /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise > \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 > X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 > / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com > ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20= > ----------------- > > > > > > > > > > > --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:18:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74FA16A66A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1244B43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:18:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ200HNN5AOLQA0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:18:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([80.203.212.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ2009FI5ANOAG1@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:18:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:18:23 +0200 From: Kyrre Nygard In-reply-to: To: Freminlins Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510181801.02200c70@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510172936.021f1e30@broadpark.no> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_userdb.so: Where is it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:18:26 -0000 At 18:06 10.05.2006, Freminlins wrote: >Kyrre, > >On 5/10/06, Kyrre Nygard ><kyrreny@broadpark.no> wrote: > >Hello! > >Does anybody know where pam_userdb.so has gone? > > >FreeBSD doesn't appear to have ever had it, so it hasn't "gone" >anywhere. The thread you linked to below suggests exactly that. > > >Linux has it, but apparently FreeBSD does not. >I need it to set up virtual users with vsftpd. > >I've been in contact with others with the same problem: > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-November/104571.html > > >As well as Freenode #vsftpd. > >But nobody seems to know what the PAM module for Berkeley DB files is at. > >Or perhaps somebody can suggest alternate methods? > > >You could download the source ( >http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/pam/Linux-PAM/modules/pam_userdb/) >and try and build it. > >Thanks, >Kyrre > > > >Frem. Thanks a lot man! That's a real good advice. I'll see what I can do with it ... All the best, Kyrre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:30:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2B516A452 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA4343D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:30:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-95-215.51-151.net24.it [151.51.215.95]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4AGY4lt002238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:34:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4AGUSlo076894; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:30:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <44621529.7050804@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:30:33 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Atom Powers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: OT: Torn between SCSI and SATA for RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:30:58 -0000 Atom Powers wrote: >> >> Another thing that I read that I'm not completely sure about. Some of >> the Adaptec SCSI Cards advertises a max of 30 devices - some even >> more. Excuse the ignorance, but does the SCSI Bus not allow for a max >> of 8 devices? Do these cards then feature multiple buses to connect >> the cables to? > I am not that familiar with SCSI protocols, but I imagine the > Ultra-Wide SCSI bus can probably address 32 devices ( 31 drives + the > controller ). Old 8-bit SCSI allow for 8 devices. For HD today you'll want Wide (16-bit) SCSI, which allows for 16 devices (15 drives + controller). There is no 32-bit SCSI, AFAIK. The Adaptec cards you mention do have two busses (basically they are two controllers on one chip and are as such seen by the OS). >> Can SATA RAID Controllers be 'linked'. >> ... can I extend a array across multiple controllers... > I imagine you would probably have to use software raid at that point. Yes and true. > And even if you would use two controllers togeather (SLI for RAID?) > you would be limited by the PCI bus. You might want a motherboard with multiple PCI buses and carefully choose the RAID scheme vs. HD distribution. If you need so many drives, however, you might well be better off with an hardware solution. > Probably with softawre RAID. With software RAID you can even mix drive > types, like SATA, PATA, SCSI, USB, etc. But it's much slower. I wouldn't want to do that... I've always heard you should get identical drives to build an array. Of course you might have different arrays on the same machine... bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:36:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2551716A5BE for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:36:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (starfish.geekisp.com [216.168.135.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A7743D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:36:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: (qmail 30750 invoked by uid 1003); 10 May 2006 16:36:48 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 10 May 2006 16:36:48 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4AGamQr011499; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:36:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k4AGakH6031648; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:36:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:36:46 -0400 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: Kyrre Nygard Message-ID: <20060510163646.GE20941@ayvali.org> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510172936.021f1e30@broadpark.no> <7.0.1.0.2.20060510181801.02200c70@broadpark.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510181801.02200c70@broadpark.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_userdb.so: Where is it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:36:54 -0000 * Kyrre Nygard [2006-05-10 18:18:23 +0200]: > > > Does anybody know where pam_userdb.so has gone? > > > > FreeBSD doesn't appear to have ever had it, so it hasn't "gone" > > anywhere. The thread you linked to below suggests exactly that. > > > > > > You could download the source and try and build it. > > That's a real good advice. I'll see what I can do with it ... Kyrre, More info for you, digging through the archives came up with this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-April/117922.html Quoting: > > There's no pam_userdb.so available for FreeBSD. You could use > > pam_pwdfile.so, which is in the ports-collection. Users are > > added/changed e.g. through htpasswd. Works well if you have not a lot of > > accounts. > > > > a simple vsftpd.pam could look like this: > > > > auth required /usr/local/lib/pam_pwdfile.so pwdfile /etc/vsftpd_login > > account required /usr/lib/pam_permit.so > > > Just to let you know that worked a treat hth, Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:50:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26BA16A783 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C41B43DA7 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1FdrtF-000OTP-Tz; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:50:22 -0600 In-Reply-To: <18e02bd30605100133p58f81d28w5d30a8089304dbce@mail.gmail.com> References: <62b856460605090453o24f7de34ka71fffa392bfdedb@mail.gmail.com> <18e02bd30605100133p58f81d28w5d30a8089304dbce@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:50:21 -0600 To: Iantcho Vassilev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jails or chroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:50:34 -0000 On May 10, 2006, at 2:33 AM, Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > On 5/9/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: >> >> >> On May 9, 2006, at 5:53 AM, Michael Grant wrote: >> >> > >> > When it comes time to upgrade, how does one upgrade 100 different >> > jails? This will be a nightmare! >> >> Actually, not. You only need 1 master jail and a bunch of nullfs >> read only mounts plus some exclusive space for each jail. I run 44 >> jails at the moment this way. Upgrading is relatively easy as I only >> have to upgrade one master jail (and unfortunately lots of jail etc >> if such happens but a few scripts can automate much of that). >> >> >> All the jails run out of one installed jail and they also have the >> side benefit of the main system directories being read only so >> exploits in one jail cannot affect all the running jails. > > > > > Wow, > I really like the setup you have make.. > > One question.How do you update the system(and the jail) ? I shut all the jails down, and update the system. Then I boot without starting the jails and rebuild the master jail according to "man jail". Then I start a special main jail that was used to install ports used, if any, into a common area and do any updates necessary -- this last one from 5.4 to 6.0 I just made sure I had the 5x compatibility stuff installed and all was fine for now so I have more time to redo individual ports or SW built frmo scratch. When that is done I restart all the jails. I had about 40 jails active when I went from 5.4 to 6.0 on this particular machine (some earlier ones I did from 5.4 to 6.0 had maybe 1 or 2 jails so they were not the definitive test case). Had no problems once I made sure all the jails were accessing the compat 5x stuff (which I did by editing in each jail /etc -- you could use a script but I am lousy at writing more than simple scripts -- the rc.conf and making sure that "ldconfig_paths=" was set appropriately to the master jail wide compat5x library location... Done, finis Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:54:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06D116A5B7 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7323343D67 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:54:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1Fdrwv-0000XJ-0b by authid for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:54:09 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:54:08 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Message-ID: <20060510165408.GA86445@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 is now available for download X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:54:12 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:28:34AM -0400, fbsd wrote: > This is just a short note to inform all the list readers that 6.1 is > available. We know. We read announce@ Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYhqwixf5fBYiFmoRAp1HAJ4wv0zA2DsE/7rCFLBSpawaWc/FUgCfTbp4 a6raOmKV3tNgKf12tes5lgk= =c45T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:59:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E44616A573 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:59:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CFC43D75 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:59:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AA413A8C4 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F35F7E443 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Fds20-0007IR-00 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:24 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20060510165924.GB27650@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 12:51:31 up 23 days, 14:12, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.05, 0.02 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Shutdown problems with 6.1 RELEASE on Sun X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:59:29 -0000 I installed the AMD64 version of 6.1 RELEASE on a Sun X2100 this morning. It went pretty well (the first NIC was declared "unkown type" but worked anayway). But I have problems when I try to shutdown the machine. The vnode flush times out, and so does the inode flush, resulting in unclean diks partions every time I reboot the achine. I suspect that this may be because this achine has SATA disks, How can I collect more data to aid in diagnosing this problem? -- U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong Terror - New York Times 9/3/1967 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:07:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318D116A882 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk (host-84-9-223-82.bulldogdsl.com [84.9.223.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB1C43D4C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:07:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD31FD04D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:07:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.devrandom.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65089-04 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:06:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.155] (unknown [192.168.1.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EXP1024-RC4-SHA (56/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DFCFD050 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:06:53 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Howells Organization: K Desktop Environment To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:06:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <4461B5DC.2010808@anticogroup.com> In-Reply-To: <4461B5DC.2010808@anticogroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605101806.08093.howells@kde.org> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devrandom.org.uk Subject: Re: transparent proxy with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:07:10 -0000 On Wednesday 10 May 2006 10:43, Oliver A. Rojo wrote: > Is there any docs on setting up transparent proxy using squid, ipf, > ipnat + freebsd-5.3? I would personally use pf; if that's an option, this works perfectly: http://www.benzedrine.cx/transquid.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:07:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405FD16A6BE for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DF943D6B for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:07:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68DEDDD41; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:03:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:11:19 +0000 From: cpghost To: Kep Woof Message-ID: <20060510171119.GA57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "jad@nominet.org.uk" Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:07:58 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:49:20PM +0000, Kep Woof wrote: > What are the key values of FreeBSD? I'd guess > something like Freedom, Stability, Robustness, quality. The current logo looks like a FAT bloated Beastie that swallowed up too much code... [recently compiled 4.11 and 6.1, and it shows...] :-) Just kidding, of course: the *code* is excellent; unlike that poor logo design (wondering why they didn't add a nice necktie to please the suits). :-) -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:20:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C97416A48C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:20:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A2D43D53 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:20:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CEDDDD41; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:15:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:24:03 +0000 From: cpghost To: Kep Woof Message-ID: <20060510172403.GB57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <9c8168780605100744n62b20da1mfe065d9a6292f7a8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9c8168780605100744n62b20da1mfe065d9a6292f7a8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Bill Moran Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:20:42 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +0000, Kep Woof wrote: > >This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it > >yourself. > > What is the procedure to fix a logo? use send-pr(1), of course! Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window open for a new try? I humbly suggest using 'FreeBSD' (the text, no graphics) as logo. The only parameter would be choosing the right distinctive font (let's call it the FreeBSD-Font) for it. Was that suggested back then? We used to have a 'FreeBSD' image on the old website. Perhaps that should have been used as a logo? ANYTHING would have been better than that current ugly sex-toy. -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:20:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFCA16A935 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E505C43D5D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:20:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdsMS-000H92-El; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:20:39 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:20:31 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: , , Kep Woof Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZ0Vgn5SL3aWuBJEdq43wAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:20:57 -0000 On 10/5/06 13:13, "fbsd" wrote: > > As a long time reader of this list I did not see any > announcement of it here. Only after selection of the > new logo was made was it talked about on this list > People were very up set with it them and the ground > swell over this has only gotten bigger. > > Loyal long time users are feeling insulted about being > left out from the decision about the need for a new logo. > A post in the archive give some lame reasons for a new logo > which many people disagreed with even then but still the > new legal FreeBSD foundation went ahead any how put it > on the official website. > > I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all. That's no reason to tell lies. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:25:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8422016A4DC for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE9D43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:25:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdsQu-000NdG-1B; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:25:17 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:25:07 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: , Nick Withers Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZ0Vq577URL6uBJEdq43wAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:25:29 -0000 On 10/5/06 15:25, "fbsd" wrote: > Your negtave comments are foundless. > A public vote is not an logistical near-impossibility. > Hell just creating a special list to submit an email > to as your yes or not vote is a simple solution and other > solutions could be found one way or the other. I guess that's why the USENET voting procedures didn't just get abandoned. > If you are insulted by my comments then I guess you > belong the self righteous snobs group and I dont care about you. Funny, that. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:27:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27D116A672 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA0843D68 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdsSX-000Ak7-Lc; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:27:10 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:26:49 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Jeff Rollin , Richard Collyer Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZ0VutHKbLBYeBKEdq43wAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <8a0028260605100842m41014b45r6c5f8600c5955d0e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:17 -0000 On 10/5/06 16:42, "Jeff Rollin" wrote: >> >> Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an >> IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing >> that I like for a screensaver? > > > I think it's a bigger problem than that. When was the last time Steve > Ballmer responded to a complaint that his shiny new elephant d*ck > screensaver crashed the system with the words "Go fuck yourself"? That's the > kind of response some who claim to be high-ups in the FreeBSD community are > giving here. Not a single "high-up", whatever that means, has responded to this thread. Could be nice if people would stop lying while trying to make a point. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:27:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FF916A7CA for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54BC43D64 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdsTF-0005PX-SF; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:27:43 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:27:33 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Daniel Bye , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD 6.1 is now available for download Thread-Index: AcZ0VwWBRAJgwOBKEdq43wAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <20060510165408.GA86445@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 is now available for download X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:51 -0000 On 10/5/06 17:54, "Daniel Bye" wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:28:34AM -0400, fbsd wrote: >> This is just a short note to inform all the list readers that 6.1 is >> available. > > We know. We read announce@ Thanks, that's funny! Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:30:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ECC16A4A5 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0197D43D4C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:30:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdsWF-000PDl-Ar; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:30:45 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:30:38 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Ted Mittelstaedt , Jonathan Horne , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New FreeBSD Logo Thread-Index: AcZ0V3PGslp1HeBKEdq43wAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:30:52 -0000 On 10/5/06 09:18, "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jonathan Horne >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:23 PM >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo >> >> >> i dont mind saying that i think i must be about the only one >> who likes the >> new art. i think its very modern looking, crisp and abreviated, >> un-childish, but at the same time not too serious or ominous. >> >> ive actually thought about printing out some examples of both versions, >> carrying it down to our artists in our print studio, and "taste testing" >> them with professional artists who couldnt give one care about anything >> technical. *shrug* would be an interesting experiment, to say >> the least. >> > > Someone already posted a professional analysis. The summary was that > the new logo was amateurish with some serious flaws. Amateurish because > a ball is about the easiest thing you can produce in Photoshop and very > unoriginal. Serious flaws because due to all the shading this logo is > impossible to accurately reproduce on small items like business cards, > and on larger items the shading makes it very expensive to reproduce due > to the number of colors used. In fact, there are reduced colour versions for exactly that reason. Since you didn't bother to look for them, I guess this isn't the real issue for you, though. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:31:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89D816A50E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C8743D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:31:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A9BDDFDF; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:34:48 +0000 From: cpghost To: Greg Barniskis Message-ID: <20060510173448.GC57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <446200A8.9020901@scls.lib.wi.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <446200A8.9020901@scls.lib.wi.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: fbsd@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:31:25 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:03:04AM -0500, Greg Barniskis wrote: > No one is belittling the subject, only pointing out that it's both > OT and done with. The appearance of the logo on the Web site is not > a beginning, it's a finality. questions@ is for general user questions. The sex-toy just appeared on the main website, and a user then asked questions about it. That's a perfectly valid forum, *especially* considering the current time frame. Questions like these, and the following threads are bound to come every now and then, also and especially here on questions@. The logo advocates and the committee that picked the current logo brought it on themselves and will have to live with it. Just like we users have to live with their unfortunate decision. -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:34:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D601716A695 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AC043D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdsZs-000G63-76; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:34:34 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:34:24 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: DAve , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New FreeBSD Logo Thread-Index: AcZ0V/p7OOQBIOBLEdq43wAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <4461F57D.502@pixelhammer.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:34:39 -0000 On 10/5/06 15:15, "DAve" wrote: > http://pixelhammer.com/aw_jeez.jpg > > This has gone too far. Searching shows that the FreeBSD questions list > had mention of this over a year ago. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-questions/2005-February/076063. > html > > To be blunt about it, you and everyone else had their chance. My wife, a > designer, knew FreeBSD had a logo contest and she wouldn't know FreeBSD > from a martian if it were not for my T-shirt. > > Anyone could have contributed. But like beta testing, most simply > ignored the request to participate, preferring to wait until someone > else did the hard work and made the tough decisions, then chose to bitch > when the result was not want they wanted. It's apathy. Yea, I'm more > than annoyed and this has been a long time coming. > > How many people actually keep a development server running just to help > open source developers test patches or updates, even when those patches > and updates do not affect them? > > How many donate to the souls who write the tools we use every day? Or do > they just read the maillists when they need help, never offering to help > others, and then get an attitude when the help they request doesn't > arrive? A lot. > > I constantly dog my employers to donate, let me have work time to help > out on lists, purchase the books (Mailscanner and Rails) that help the > developers, keep a development box for testing. They complain even > though they could not compete in the market place had they been required > to purchase licenses for all the software they use. > > The Internet is the industry that open source built, and it has created > a society of hand out junkies who think they should get everything their > way, for free, right now. > > This job isn't fun anymore. Hear, hear. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:36:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9855316A4EE for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6999543D78 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:36:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fdsbo-000ALY-EY; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:36:33 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:36:24 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: vote for keeping "beastie" as official logo Thread-Index: AcZ0WEIBgJgbyOBLEdq43wAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: vote for keeping "beastie" as official logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:36:40 -0000 On 10/5/06 15:53, "fbsd" wrote: > > If you are as dissatisfied with the new official logo > as I am, then forward this email to the FreeBSD federation > board of directors at board@freebsdfoundation.org > > Dear FreeBSD federation board of directors: > > I am upset with the manner in which it was decided > that a new logo was needed. > > Only posting a message that this was happening on the > announcement list was an big mistake as it left out > the users who promote FreeBSD at the grass roots > level from knowing about it. An change of this > magnitude should have been broadcast to all lists > to get the widest based input possible. > > I sincerely hope this deception was not on > purpose as it looks that way. > > Furthermore the new logo design is not satisfactory > and does not represent the wants of the user community > as shown by the multiple posts on the questions > list of late. > > > My vote is for keeping the beastie image as the > official FreeBSD logo and removing the sex toy > logo from publication. OK, you have had your say. Will you then, for the love of all that is sacred, stop starting new threads on this subject? Please. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:38:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8D116A6D4 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE3F43D66 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:38:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdsdP-0008Su-7A; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:38:09 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:38:02 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: bc , freebsd-questions Message-ID: Thread-Topic: 6.1_RELEASE Install Problem Thread-Index: AcZ0WHxruyAtWOBLEdq43wAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <51257d370605092103t4c4bf3b1gd80e9dda9373a2c0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: 6.1_RELEASE Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:38:17 -0000 On 10/5/06 05:03, "bc" wrote: > After make installworld I ran the final run thru of mergemaster and recived > this error: > > ERROR CODE 64 > FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'dc' into /usr/src/etc/ and install files to the > temproot environment. Did you cut and paste that, or copy it in manually? Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:40:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CAB16A55D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC6E43D64 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:40:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdsfK-000N8H-Is; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:40:08 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:40:01 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: cpghost , Kep Woof Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZ0WMNZAhdKLOBMEdq43wAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <20060510172403.GB57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Bill Moran Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:40:18 -0000 On 10/5/06 18:24, "cpghost" wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +0000, Kep Woof wrote: >>> This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it >>> yourself. >> >> What is the procedure to fix a logo? > > use send-pr(1), of course! > > Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window > open for a new try? I humbly suggest using 'FreeBSD' (the text, > no graphics) as logo. The only parameter would be choosing the > right distinctive font (let's call it the FreeBSD-Font) for it. > Was that suggested back then? We used to have a 'FreeBSD' image > on the old website. Perhaps that should have been used as a logo? > ANYTHING would have been better than that current ugly sex-toy. There were tens of submissions that just had the word 'FreeBSD'. The word 'FreeBSD' isn't a logo, or they looked crappy, so they lost. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:44:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83F016A4E2 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FED43D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:44:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39A2DE090; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:39:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:47:44 +0000 From: cpghost To: fbsd , Nick Withers , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Message-ID: <20060510174744.GD57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20060510223724.59bc096a.nick@nickwithers.com> <20060510152854.GA53391@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060510152854.GA53391@owl.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:44:22 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:28:55PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > Many professional logo design people never even knew about > > the contest to redesign the logo because it was not posted > > to the questions list where everyone reads. > > Not everyone reads the questions list. Heck, not even all the > developers do, due to the low signal/noise ratio here. Uh-oh! A mindset like this would explain a lot of things. :-( Fortunately, there *are* developers here who do take users' questions seriously. cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:47:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2944416A45F for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FEF43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:47:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF63DE090; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:42:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:51:10 +0000 From: cpghost To: Ceri Davies Message-ID: <20060510175110.GE57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20060510172403.GB57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org, Bill Moran Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:47:47 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > On 10/5/06 18:24, "cpghost" wrote: > > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +0000, Kep Woof wrote: > >>> This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it > >>> yourself. > >> > >> What is the procedure to fix a logo? > > > > use send-pr(1), of course! > > > > Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window > > open for a new try? I humbly suggest using 'FreeBSD' (the text, > > no graphics) as logo. The only parameter would be choosing the > > right distinctive font (let's call it the FreeBSD-Font) for it. > > Was that suggested back then? We used to have a 'FreeBSD' image > > on the old website. Perhaps that should have been used as a logo? > > ANYTHING would have been better than that current ugly sex-toy. > > There were tens of submissions that just had the word 'FreeBSD'. Ah, good to know. Thank you. > The word > 'FreeBSD' isn't a logo, or they looked crappy, so they lost. What about 'SONY' or 'IBM'? They are logos too. Granted, not as long as 'FreeBSD', but a word doesn't disqualify as a logo just because it's a word. Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:49:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FEC16A475 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6698643D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1777080nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:49:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=C1ZIXPvsFcGsMNAeXYI25a+Swyz15foovug26p1HwMHk/JDuVzgwzPlReYWu9kb4HWhpeo82xaLfFJHq/VOT6x4z24Dtko1jlva7FTEgzxdhAm693oMaQ4zpfFCrktnMstR8OAzZfbCwA3FvQlHf64UkxXFKd4/2suadhfVBCb8= Received: by 10.65.74.4 with SMTP id b4mr639195qbl; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.179.13 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <226ae0c60605101049l5f8f76bdl3ddd9130e88d0851@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:15 -0400 From: "David Robillard" To: "FreeBSD Questions Mailing List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Jim Stapleton Subject: Re: securing beyond the handbook. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:49:37 -0000 > Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:17:30 -0400 > From: "Jim Stapleton" > Subject: securing beyond the handbook > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > =09<80f4f2b20605100617t3adfc57brc213c8571288727f@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed > > I'm about to get a static IP and direct outside access for my BSD box > (before it was hidden behind a firewall/NAT). I was comfortable with > the level of security I've had, but with the whole "open to the > outside world" setup I'll have, what would you suggest for securing > it? > > I'll be running: > Apache > PHP > MySQL > SSH/SFTP > OpenRPG (only occasionally, from a special nonpriv account) > > Any suggestions, any of these that you know are such huge security > holes that you would absolutely demand something else be run? > > Any other security suggestions? Hi Jim, I would strongly suggest running your internet accessible applications from inside a jail. Check some man pages for jail information: jail(8), jls(8) and jexec(8). The nice thing about jails is that once everything is installed and running, you can strip it of any files which is not used by your applications (such as compilers for example). Therefore, if someone breaks in, he is limited in his capabilites. Plus he does not gain your real root password (assuming you are not using the same passwords in your jail of course ;) Configure sshd(8) to allow only a certain set of trusted users via AllowUsers configuration. Prohibit direct root login via "PermitRootLogin no" and consider using public keys with a strong passphrase instead of a simple password for login. If you have a Kerberos server, use it. Next, check your network architecture. Give your jail the public IP or NAT it in your firewall to a DMZ section of your network. Make sure your internet accessible applications are not inside your LAN. Be certain to never let internet connections have direct access to machines inside the LAN. Also, consider running host intrusion detection. Such as Osiris, Samhain or Tripwire. You can find them all in the FreeBSD ports. Talking of ports, make sure you install security/portaudit to keep track of you port's security. Subscribe to the FreeBSD security mailing list and take action when an advisory is sent. Use mod_security with your Apache server. http://www.modsecurity.org/=20 Actually, remove all unused Apache module from your httpd.conf(5). Run your MySQL database on another host (or another jail) which is in a seperate Database DMZ which can only be accessed by certain well defined hosts. Use tcp_wrappers to secure you connections. Use sudo(8) instead of root. Finally, check out some really good books on various security related issue= s: Mastering FreeBSD and OpenBSD security from O'Reilly. Apache Security from O'Reilly. Essential PHP Security from O'Reilly. Host Integrity Monitoring using Osiris and Samhain from Syngress. FreeBSD security & hardening guide: http://www.syslog.org/Content-5-4.phtml Oh, and don't forget to backup regularly. It's also part of your security. Have fun! David > Thanks, > -Jim -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator, CISSP Montr=E9al: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:55:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF6316A439 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9627043D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:55:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([70.39.69.56]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060510175516.HVYY14145.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:55:16 -0400 From: "fbsd" To: "Jim Stapleton" , Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:55:11 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <80f4f2b20605100617t3adfc57brc213c8571288727f@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: securing beyond the handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:55:18 -0000 There is no difference between a dynamic and static ip address from the point of the firewall. If you felt secure before, then getting a static ip address will have no effect on that. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jim Stapleton Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:18 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: securing beyond the handbook I'm about to get a static IP and direct outside access for my BSD box (before it was hidden behind a firewall/NAT). I was comfortable with the level of security I've had, but with the whole "open to the outside world" setup I'll have, what would you suggest for securing it? I'll be running: Apache PHP MySQL SSH/SFTP OpenRPG (only occasionally, from a special nonpriv account) Any suggestions, any of these that you know are such huge security holes that you would absolutely demand something else be run? Any other security suggestions? Thanks, -Jim _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:58:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D578816A424 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6961E43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:58:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so808589pye for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:58:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VDl8T2CTc/AAkUvcHlbtUzwnW7gOSTHRbFkoxRY6hdeCVYSUfEQ+ixEaKsktXGuJiypY5S2feplqEvLvaBKfDRNDm93pEEneLo3tfQMPKSVgeRoIbLAGhS6F5ltxDu5ozc4Ny3hyWOLYfuDzgwPEqYGuIJ35ozZE9p44eNNjgOY= Received: by 10.35.60.15 with SMTP id n15mr1303884pyk; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.22.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:58:02 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: freebsd In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4461F57D.502@pixelhammer.com> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:58:04 -0000 Could we please stop this flood?? -- Pietro Cerutti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:00:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7BD16A441 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8491143D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:00:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1779388nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:00:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=WpUq+ltbeTIxqAcW2mIPZ/fd1d+POLICEcl4LXJJMJEuRGbHgeOpmc8j54ImB9Xb4CSOkQImdGolRUuHWjmHSzzzmZZHmLvv1zCWUe8DuudOTNDAOfe37kTKSJ6LI8zJHi0PH2+EwCnYxnEBV+1Z6mX3UJ0vBws8egNBCwwBB+k= Received: by 10.65.203.12 with SMTP id f12mr656832qbq; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.107.14 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0028260605101100jb3476a9m9db217a1cf6ff876@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:00:49 +0100 From: "Jeff Rollin" To: "Ceri Davies" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: fbsd@a1poweruser.com, Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org, jad@nominet.org.uk Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:00:51 -0000 > > > > I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all. > > That's no reason to tell lies. There's no reason to accuse people of telling lies without having any evidence, either. Can't wait till you get caught out. Jeff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:03:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C1C16A5CB for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:03:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEF043D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:03:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fdt1P-0000ZP-Ky; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:02:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:02:51 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: cpghost Message-ID: <20060510180251.GF19173@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , cpghost , Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org, Bill Moran References: <20060510172403.GB57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <20060510175110.GE57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Izn7cH1Com+I3R9J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060510175110.GE57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org, Bill Moran Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:03:07 -0000 --Izn7cH1Com+I3R9J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:51:10PM +0000, cpghost wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > > On 10/5/06 18:24, "cpghost" wrote: > >=20 > > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +0000, Kep Woof wrote: > > >>> This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it > > >>> yourself. > > >>=20 > > >> What is the procedure to fix a logo? > > >=20 > > > use send-pr(1), of course! > > >=20 > > > Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window > > > open for a new try? I humbly suggest using 'FreeBSD' (the text, > > > no graphics) as logo. The only parameter would be choosing the > > > right distinctive font (let's call it the FreeBSD-Font) for it. > > > Was that suggested back then? We used to have a 'FreeBSD' image > > > on the old website. Perhaps that should have been used as a logo? > > > ANYTHING would have been better than that current ugly sex-toy. > >=20 > > There were tens of submissions that just had the word 'FreeBSD'. >=20 > Ah, good to know. Thank you. >=20 > > The word > > 'FreeBSD' isn't a logo, or they looked crappy, so they lost. >=20 > What about 'SONY' or 'IBM'? They are logos too. Granted, not as > long as 'FreeBSD', but a word doesn't disqualify as a logo just > because it's a word. I wouldn't sweat (or trust my memory to remember) the details. Most of them definitely said "Free BSD" though. Ceri --=20 That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --Izn7cH1Com+I3R9J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYirLocfcwTS3JF8RApIHAJwIzbTIMoeDC0U3adSDs56nt5FNowCgnVPj j1UmuCPskTrFNTSRJQLg028= =nzFD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Izn7cH1Com+I3R9J-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:03:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9865716A60D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cruzweb@gmail.com) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [63.240.77.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAE443D66 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:03:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cruzweb@gmail.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-68-61-214-252.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.61.214.252]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20060510180333014005kb9ee>; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:03:33 +0000 Message-ID: <44622AF5.90700@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:03:33 -0400 From: John Cruz Organization: Cruz Web Development User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1902670.1147233030936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <1902670.1147233030936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Setting Default NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@cruzweb.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:03:39 -0000 I Just upgraded my freebsd machine to a new board, this one has an onboard NIC where as the old one just had a PCI 10/100 nic. I put the old NIC on the new board as well so I can have 2 running out of the machine, but I don't know how to set it so that the onboard NIC (vr0) is the default and the PIC nic (r10) is not, because when I unplug the PCI one all net connectivity shuts down. Here's my ifconfig and my rc.conf as always help is much appreciated. *********IFCONFIG rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 fe80::210:b5ff:fe5f:c324%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.42.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.42.255 ether 00:10:b5:5f:c3:24 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::250:70ff:fee8:7fe%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 192.168.42.9 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.42.255 ether 00:50:70:e8:07:fe media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ***********RC.CONF # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Jan 1 19:02:32 2006 # Created: Sun Jan 1 19:02:32 2006 # Enable network daemons for user convenience. # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. hostname="taurus.cruz" #ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" inetd_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" moused_flags="-3" moused_port="/dev/psm0" moused_type="auto" nfs_server_enable="YES" rpcbind_enable="YES" saver="daemon" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" apache2_enable="YES" apache_enable="YES" mysqld_enable="YES" mysql_enable="YES" mountd_flags = "-r" # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Jan 15 11:40:28 2006 # The Following specifies that the server is using a static IP address ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.42.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.42.9 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="192.168.42.1" hostname="taurus.cruz" # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Apr 9 01:33:24 2006 nfs_client_enable="YES" # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Apr 23 21:29:11 2006 font8x8="swiss-8x8" font8x14="NO" font8x16="swiss-8x16" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:05:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EB016A68D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:05:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0833643D69 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:05:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fdt46-0002hN-Jt; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:05:38 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:05:38 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Jeff Rollin Message-ID: <20060510180538.GG19173@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Jeff Rollin , fbsd@a1poweruser.com, jad@nominet.org.uk, Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org References: <8a0028260605101100jb3476a9m9db217a1cf6ff876@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a0028260605101100jb3476a9m9db217a1cf6ff876@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: fbsd@a1poweruser.com, Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org, jad@nominet.org.uk Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:05:55 -0000 --HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:00:49PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote: > > > > > >> I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all. > > > >That's no reason to tell lies. >=20 > There's no reason to accuse people of telling lies without having any > evidence, either. Statements were made which are provably untrue. Call it what you want. > Can't wait till you get caught out. Sure. Ceri --=20 That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYityocfcwTS3JF8RAjHBAJ9JdxDZclNT5xM0AmzKrhN7JNtkMACePI6c WThPz801CSWbKxO+gyqRtEo= =8Be0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:08:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F1E16A64B for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FE343D6E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:07:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4AI7Zqx001539; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:07:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <44622BDF.3090703@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:07:27 -0500 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cpghost References: <446200A8.9020901@scls.lib.wi.us> <20060510173448.GC57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20060510173448.GC57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fbsd@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:08:17 -0000 cpghost wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:03:04AM -0500, Greg Barniskis wrote: >> No one is belittling the subject, only pointing out that it's both >> OT and done with. The appearance of the logo on the Web site is not >> a beginning, it's a finality. > > questions@ is for general user questions. The sex-toy just appeared > on the main website, and a user then asked questions about it. That's > a perfectly valid forum, *especially* considering the current time frame. Point taken. I could have phrased that better. * What/when/how did this happen? * How and when can it be undone? * Why didn't I hear about this before? These are indeed all perfectly valid questions. What I was trying to express is that the askers really don't seem to be accepting (or even seeing) the perfectly valid answers: * See the archives where this was beaten to death multiple times. * The best place to pursue such matters is in those forums chartered for PR and general chatter. * Read announce@. To those taking affront at such answers, no one is saying "oh, fork you!" in some intentionally rude or belittling way (at least, I'm not), they're saying forking (process-wise) to the appropriate forum is the logical thing to do. And [in response to the opposition party] no, I don't buy the assertion that questions@ is the correct forum to continue fighting in simply because it's popular. That's like saying spam is good because it reaches a lot of people cheaply. Forums have charters for reasons. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:19:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62C416A420 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:19:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D52843D6D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:17:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1782738nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:17:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kw69atil4x8p9VmdBtkRkapVLyl7aLMF9cgJwnSYoqj7owtqmWB31bhbVXOQ1DO5CnxjBLmgv+tHiKYQT/8RUiOLQhV9d83Jad40IiniaRgPQDNGCZObZ9LC0xl6wwF3eiWMy+vK0Huokd+k553D4Cx7d+B5AJDSbwydh9urPvg= Received: by 10.65.150.8 with SMTP id c8mr677246qbo; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.107.14 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0028260605101117o3fa252fbl3c85ae5504cc457f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:17:48 +0100 From: "Jeff Rollin" To: cpghost In-Reply-To: <20060510175110.GE57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060510172403.GB57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <20060510175110.GE57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Kep Woof , Ceri Davies , questions@freebsd.org, Bill Moran Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:20:00 -0000 > > > > > > Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window > > > open for a new try? I humbly suggest using 'FreeBSD' (the text, Good idea. The word "FreeBSD" as it stood at the top of the freebsd.orgmainpage the day before the release of 6.1-RELEASE was nice. > > There were tens of submissions that just had the word 'FreeBSD'. > > Ah, good to know. Thank you. > > > The word > > 'FreeBSD' isn't a logo, or they looked crappy, so they lost. > > What about 'SONY' or 'IBM'? They are logos too. Granted, not as > long as 'FreeBSD', but a word doesn't disqualify as a logo just > because it's a word. "Technics" is even longer. "Daewoo" and "Sanyo" are shorter, but foreign to all but the Koreans (in the first case) and the Japanese (in the second) Plus, the Koreans and the Japanese don't write in the Roman alphabet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:20:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CE416A4BF for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk (host-84-9-223-82.bulldogdsl.com [84.9.223.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6803043D8A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:17:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E932FD04E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:17:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.devrandom.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65629-09 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:17:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.175] (unknown [192.168.1.175]) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C024FD04D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:17:47 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <44622E46.3020507@kde.org> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:17:42 +0100 From: Chris Howells User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060510223724.59bc096a.nick@nickwithers.com> <20060510152854.GA53391@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20060510174744.GD57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20060510174744.GD57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devrandom.org.uk Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:20:18 -0000 cpghost wrote: > Uh-oh! A mindset like this would explain a lot of things. :-( Yes, it explains that some people are too busy to read hundreds of messages on this list, and would rather do something else like coding. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:21:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292D616A967 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF1043E03 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:19:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so1783018nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:19:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rGCkNZrR88/CsY7qNPrqMvReifRHuE+CZoktYnr4GHhRqI4qk/MueIFIJUCmA8FCL5x+gq3hTS6MjX1mnVZc2N+3R06f5ziTnkdsGgBvXK2aduhhSuOzu7ZfLYP1LSTI/v7WBJiomxG/Ehpnd933K5FGPqAuqTXXR2GWuobsXok= Received: by 10.65.222.9 with SMTP id z9mr679553qbq; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:19:06 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: john@cruzweb.net In-Reply-To: <44622AF5.90700@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1902670.1147233030936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <44622AF5.90700@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting Default NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:21:10 -0000 On 5/10/06, John Cruz wrote: > I Just upgraded my freebsd machine to a new board, this one has an > onboard NIC where as the old one just had a PCI 10/100 nic. I put the > old NIC on the new board as well so I can have 2 running out of the > machine, but I don't know how to set it so that the onboard NIC (vr0) is > the default and the PIC nic (r10) is not, because when I unplug the PCI > one all net connectivity shuts down. Here's my ifconfig and my rc.conf > as always help is much appreciated. rl0 already is the "default", if by default you mean the nic used when no nic is specified with command like tcpdump. This sounds like a routing problem. I am guessing that your default router is 192.168.42.1. If that is the case the systew will use the interface "closest" to the router to send packets out, which in this case is the vr0 interface. Try `ifconfig vr0 down` instead of unplugging it. Or give rl0 an IP in the range 192.168.42.2-8. > *********IFCONFIG > > rl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > options=3D8 > inet6 fe80::210:b5ff:fe5f:c324%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 192.168.42.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.42.255 > ether 00:10:b5:5f:c3:24 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > vr0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > inet6 fe80::250:70ff:fee8:7fe%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > inet 192.168.42.9 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.42.255 > ether 00:50:70:e8:07:fe > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > plip0: flags=3D108810 mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=3D8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > ***********RC.CONF > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Jan 1 19:02:32 2006 > # Created: Sun Jan 1 19:02:32 2006 > # Enable network daemons for user convenience. > # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > hostname=3D"taurus.cruz" > #ifconfig_rl0=3D"DHCP" > inetd_enable=3D"YES" > moused_enable=3D"YES" > moused_flags=3D"-3" > moused_port=3D"/dev/psm0" > moused_type=3D"auto" > nfs_server_enable=3D"YES" > rpcbind_enable=3D"YES" > saver=3D"daemon" > sshd_enable=3D"YES" > usbd_enable=3D"YES" > apache2_enable=3D"YES" > apache_enable=3D"YES" > mysqld_enable=3D"YES" > mysql_enable=3D"YES" > mountd_flags =3D "-r" > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Jan 15 11:40:28 2006 > # The Following specifies that the server is using a static IP address > ifconfig_rl0=3D"inet 192.168.42.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_vr0=3D"inet 192.168.42.9 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > defaultrouter=3D"192.168.42.1" > hostname=3D"taurus.cruz" > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Apr 9 01:33:24 2006 > nfs_client_enable=3D"YES" > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Apr 23 21:29:11 2006 > font8x8=3D"swiss-8x8" > font8x14=3D"NO" > font8x16=3D"swiss-8x16" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:24:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6088A16A498 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CCC43D7C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:23:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from mail.dfwlp.com (localhost.int.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4AIN4YY014161; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:23:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from 167.246.36.14 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by mail.dfwlp.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:23:04 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <36249.167.246.36.14.1147285384.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <44622AF5.90700@gmail.com> References: <1902670.1147233030936.JavaMail.root@elwamui-karabash.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <44622AF5.90700@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:23:04 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: john@cruzweb.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting Default NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:24:31 -0000 > I Just upgraded my freebsd machine to a new board, this one has an > onboard NIC where as the old one just had a PCI 10/100 nic. I put the > old NIC on the new board as well so I can have 2 running out of the > machine, but I don't know how to set it so that the onboard NIC (vr0) is > the default and the PIC nic (r10) is not, because when I unplug the PCI > one all net connectivity shuts down. Here's my ifconfig and my rc.conf > as always help is much appreciated. > > *********IFCONFIG > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet6 fe80::210:b5ff:fe5f:c324%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 192.168.42.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.42.255 > ether 00:10:b5:5f:c3:24 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet6 fe80::250:70ff:fee8:7fe%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > inet 192.168.42.9 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.42.255 > ether 00:50:70:e8:07:fe > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > ***********RC.CONF > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Jan 1 19:02:32 2006 > # Created: Sun Jan 1 19:02:32 2006 > # Enable network daemons for user convenience. > # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > hostname="taurus.cruz" > #ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" > inetd_enable="YES" > moused_enable="YES" > moused_flags="-3" > moused_port="/dev/psm0" > moused_type="auto" > nfs_server_enable="YES" > rpcbind_enable="YES" > saver="daemon" > sshd_enable="YES" > usbd_enable="YES" > apache2_enable="YES" > apache_enable="YES" > mysqld_enable="YES" > mysql_enable="YES" > mountd_flags = "-r" > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Jan 15 11:40:28 2006 > # The Following specifies that the server is using a static IP address > ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.42.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.42.9 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > defaultrouter="192.168.42.1" > hostname="taurus.cruz" > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Apr 9 01:33:24 2006 > nfs_client_enable="YES" > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Sun Apr 23 21:29:11 2006 > font8x8="swiss-8x8" > font8x14="NO" > font8x16="swiss-8x16" > are those 2 nics going to be bonded into 1 interface? haveing 2 nics, on the same network isnt really going to earn you anything unless they are bonded or loadbalanced, either thru network configuration or switching hardware. if youre not going to go thru one of those techniques, then i would remove one nics. unless, long shot (tm), as in this has no technical base, just a guess... have you tried reversing the order in which they appear in the rc.conf file? i dont know if that matters, or if it reads the order of their IRQs, but it might be worth a shot if you really want both of those nics. jonathanh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:33:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9C516AB02 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE6443D69 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:33:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCA01A4DDA; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BDDA251664; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:33:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:33:14 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: cpghost Message-ID: <20060510183314.GA33538@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060510223724.59bc096a.nick@nickwithers.com> <20060510152854.GA53391@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20060510174744.GD57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060510174744.GD57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: fbsd , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" , Nick Withers Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:33:17 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:44PM +0000, cpghost wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:28:55PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > Many professional logo design people never even knew about > > > the contest to redesign the logo because it was not posted > > > to the questions list where everyone reads. > >=20 > > Not everyone reads the questions list. Heck, not even all the > > developers do, due to the low signal/noise ratio here. >=20 > Uh-oh! A mindset like this would explain a lot of things. :-( >=20 > Fortunately, there *are* developers here who do take users' > questions seriously. You missed the point. Signal =3D questions from users about FreeBSD technical support. Noise =3D lots of whining about the logo. On the plus side, if you guys keep it up I'll be able to dramatically improve my view of the S/N ratio by adding those with nothing better to contribute than their indignation to my killfile (some are there already) so I *can* focus on the user questions. Kris --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYjHqWry0BWjoQKURAtsJAKCL4gtlSLeObJBkwzY+uReJTw/6TQCeK0ON SEJtSFi5isIBiwpL+GvY2tI= =Z0NR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 19:07:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3AD16A7BE for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7289443D78 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:07:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so1450357nfa for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:07:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rfjrYY2f9fPDpc3zfVfkk2wclPWA29YKciTFj84ZBrX0knXyN4p0R+K3SbMI5DPkjdrnhQ0JhHu0Xr1vRUg0cRb1ODLMo/CLFKBeHrJq70IeDZqZNJEnr2qok4JhSVKpduUxIrJ+FAX5aeO3jdWI+4as108dwINE8529s87Ajhc= Received: by 10.49.19.14 with SMTP id w14mr877394nfi; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.5.13 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550605101207l5a5cde40u17bca5c0638017e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:07:41 +0200 From: "Daniel A." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1814_33170377.1147288061015" Subject: 6.1 hangs at boot, sata raid controller unsupported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:07:51 -0000 ------=_Part_1814_33170377.1147288061015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I have had this problem since I tried to install 6.0 on my desktop workstation, and even in 6.1, which has improved SATA RAID support, it persists. Original thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-April/118272.html Problem: FreeBSD hangs when it detects my 120GB Seagate Barracuda drive, attached alone to my onboard Promise FastTrak 376 controller. Everything works perfectly in Windows. No errors, no problems. FreeBSD will only boot in Safe Mode, and then it gives me this: ... ad8: 114473MB at ata4-master PIO4 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=3D234441585 ad8: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (1 retry left) LBA=3D0 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=3D234441631 ad8: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (0 retries left) LBA=3D0 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=3D234441644 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=3D0 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=3D234441585 ad8: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (1 retry left) LBA=3D0 ... When booting in non-safemode, it just hangs forever at the first line I pas= ted. I've attached my old dmesg.boot from 6.0. Please help. I love FreeBSD and I would be endlessly happy if I could get it on my desktop. =3D/ ------=_Part_1814_33170377.1147288061015 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=dmesg.boot Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Attachment-Id: f_en21n6w6 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.boot" Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz (2400.10-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf24 Stepping = 4 Features=0x3febfbff real memory = 1073725440 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1041833984 (993 MB) npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface cpu0 on motherboard pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pir0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xb0000000-0xb7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pci1: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 2.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 fwohci0: mem 0xae800000-0xae800fff at device 2.3 on pci0 $PIR: ROUTE_INTERRUPT failed. fwohci0: Could not allocate irq device_attach: fwohci0 attach returned 6 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xa400-0xa40f irq 11 at device 2.5 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 pci0: at device 2.7 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xae000000-0xae000fff irq 9 at device 3.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xad800000-0xad800fff irq 9 at device 3.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ohci2: mem 0xad000000-0xad000fff irq 9 at device 3.2 on pci0 ohci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb2: SMM does not respond, resetting usb2: on ohci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xac800000-0xac800fff at device 3.3 on pci0 $PIR: ROUTE_INTERRUPT failed. ehci0: Could not allocate irq device_attach: ehci0 attach returned 6 sis0: port 0x8800-0x88ff mem 0xac000000-0xac000fff at device 4.0 on pci0 miibus0: on sis0 rlphy0: on miibus0 rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto sis0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:18:b0:e3:5b pci0: at device 13.0 (no driver attached) atapci1: port 0x8000-0x803f,0x7800-0x780f,0x7400-0x747f mem 0xab800000-0xab800fff,0xab000000-0xab01ffff irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 ata4: on atapci1 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xccfff,0xd0000-0xd3fff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (memory) unknown: can't assign resources (port) ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/21.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 7 buttons and Z dir. ukbd0: Logitech Logitech USB Keyboard, rev 1.10/15.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1 kbd1 at ukbd0 uhid0: Logitech Logitech USB Keyboard, rev 1.10/15.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2400098696 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 76319MB at ata0-master PIO4 ad1: 76319MB at ata0-slave PIO4 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master PIO4 ad8: 114473MB at ata4-master PIO4 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=234441585 ad8: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (1 retry left) LBA=0 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=234441631 ad8: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (0 retries left) LBA=0 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=234441644 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=0 ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=234441585 ad8: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (1 retry left) LBA=0 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad1s1a ------=_Part_1814_33170377.1147288061015-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 19:59:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2457B16AFCB for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5409043D55 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:59:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from [198.182.157.171] (not-in-use.calarts.edu [198.182.157.171] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4AJxLOj073663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:45 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 Subject: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:59:27 -0000 Is there a way to tell a daemon to listen only to the localhost without using a firewall? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:10:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D32316B21A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8964343D76 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:10:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from mail.dfwlp.com (localhost.int.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4AKAh4Z014714 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:10:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from 167.246.36.14 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by mail.dfwlp.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:10:43 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <31556.167.246.36.14.1147291843.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> References: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:10:43 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:11:01 -0000 > Is there a way to tell a daemon to listen only to the localhost without > using a firewall? > any chance you could tell us what deamon youre trying to configure? (that would help). jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:13:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E41F16A94A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9ED43D7E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k4AKD4pM018770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 May 2006 23:13:07 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4AKDKZc061036; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:13:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4AKDK3g061035; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:13:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:13:20 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Sean Murphy Message-ID: <20060510201320.GD60714@gothmog.pc> References: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.394, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.81, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:13:40 -0000 On 2006-05-10 12:59, Sean Murphy wrote: > Is there a way to tell a daemon to listen only to the localhost without > using a firewall? This depends on the daemon. Some programs accept a command-line option to do this. Others don't. What daemon are you interested in doing this for? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:19:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A5616AE04 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E16E43D73 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:19:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146A95E1E; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:19:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eDLMYqcMKTBx; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:19:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1945CFE; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:19:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> References: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4EB3F6F4-7F22-4F38-9C81-27A0A82F1984@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:19:19 -0400 To: Sean Murphy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:19:33 -0000 On May 10, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Sean Murphy wrote: > Is there a way to tell a daemon to listen only to the localhost > without using a firewall? If the daemon has an option to listen on a specific IP address, yes; otherwise, no. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:31:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C851316A5F0 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F31843D64 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:31:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maanjee@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so11805wxc for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:31:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=SfSQ8NGmJPlTg7oLpLTFmKT3e0HZ7qWqMvZqt6JmXXHECnM/huOoOejGft80aFvgRw/wEfU7a1q+da81a1aBkAWxb3cbYnu9OwqzaCffa6GfWM7cGmcNZ/qCEbYLgHS/pog99S2gKlsWwx5Uf2ER8a6PNhKv6EbMvvh0w/fA66M= Received: by 10.70.72.1 with SMTP id u1mr6264wxa; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.94.16 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2cd0a0da0605101331g345b9c44u970fbf5764db6f2c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:31:12 +0200 From: "Maan Jee" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Help! FreeBSD Webserver with two NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:31:41 -0000 Hello Gurus.... I think you might help me.... I want to run a webserver which will be having a good traffic. At present, I have a 100/10 Mbps internet connection (fiber-optics) but with this connection I cannot get Fixed IP for the webserver. To get the Fixed-IP, I am getting a 24/1 Mbps internet line through Telephone line. But I am just in doubt that my webserver might not be able to server the documents with good serving speed due to 1 Mbps upstream... So, I came to an idea that if I use two NICs, one NIC bounded to 100/10 Mbps to serve the pages and one which would be bound with 24/1 Mbps connection with Fixed-IP to litsen the requests.... my Question is that is it possible and if so, how? I am planning to install FreeBSD as a OS. Thanks.... VJ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:32:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1229716B1E9 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shiemstra@h2.com) Received: from hermes.h2web.com (mx1.h2web.com [67.132.72.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65A1543D5C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shiemstra@h2.com) Received: (qmail 38067 invoked by uid 1011); 10 May 2006 16:32:12 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO hanky) (192.168.1.3) by hermes.h2web.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 16:32:12 -0400 From: "Scott Hiemstra" To: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:34:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZ0bF6o3UBv8UTZTSaMOX6lrJOtUAABBnFg Message-Id: <20060510203213.65A1543D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:32:20 -0000 > Is there a way to tell a daemon to listen only to the > localhost without > using a firewall? As others have stated, check the daemon you are trying to run but many can also run via tcpserver (http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html). Going this route you can limit the listening IP to localhost or whatever. I personally swear by this route as it is a good/clean method of controling services. Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:35:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1141016AB17 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6F043D55 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:35:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from [198.182.157.171] (not-in-use.calarts.edu [198.182.157.171] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4AKZGf4075285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 May 2006 13:35:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <44624E9C.3070102@calarts.edu> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:35:40 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Swiger References: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> <4EB3F6F4-7F22-4F38-9C81-27A0A82F1984@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <4EB3F6F4-7F22-4F38-9C81-27A0A82F1984@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:35:25 -0000 the ftp daemon that is started with inetd it is the ftp that comes with the freebsd system 5.4. Thanks Charles Swiger wrote: > On May 10, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Sean Murphy wrote: >> Is there a way to tell a daemon to listen only to the localhost >> without using a firewall? > > If the daemon has an option to listen on a specific IP address, yes; > otherwise, no. > > ---Chuck > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:39:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D8116AA41 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (mail-cluster.cnf.com [63.230.177.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE11E43D73 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:38:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA67714C29A; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com (cnfdcx-131-slb-01-in.cnf.com [10.0.108.131]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87D914BF5F; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com ([10.40.10.68]) by ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 10 May 2006 13:38:53 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:38:52 -0500 Message-ID: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04391213@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Help! FreeBSD Webserver with two NICs Thread-Index: AcZ0cXRX/X2hYvUlS0m8W3RCnvQaHQAADKKg From: "Zimmerman, Eric" To: "Maan Jee" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2006 20:38:53.0595 (UTC) FILETIME=[C07976B0:01C67471] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: RE: Help! FreeBSD Webserver with two NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:39:02 -0000 >=20 > I think you might help me.... >=20 > I want to run a webserver which will be having a good traffic. >=20 > At present, I have a 100/10 Mbps internet connection > (fiber-optics) but with this connection I cannot get Fixed IP for the > webserver. >=20 > To get the Fixed-IP, I am getting a 24/1 Mbps internet line through > Telephone line. But I am just in doubt that my webserver might not be able > to server the documents with good serving speed due to 1 Mbps upstream... >=20 > So, I came to an idea that if I use two NICs, one NIC bounded to 100/10 > Mbps to serve the pages and one which would be bound with 24/1 Mbps > connection with Fixed-IP to litsen the requests.... >=20 > my Question is that is it possible and if so, how? >=20 > I am planning to install FreeBSD as a OS. >=20 Holy cow where do you live for those speeds? Can you use a service like DynDNS.org and just use the 100/10 connection?=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:42:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D40216B143 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:42:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD2F43D75 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:42:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from [198.182.157.171] (not-in-use.calarts.edu [198.182.157.171] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4AKgYQ4075651 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:42:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <44625052.3000602@calarts.edu> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:42:58 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 Subject: Re: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:42:42 -0000 the ftp daemon that is started with inetd it is the ftp that comes with the freebsd system 5.4. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:51:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C9316B353 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shiemstra@h2.com) Received: from hermes.h2web.com (mx1.h2web.com [67.132.72.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0834443D6D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:51:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shiemstra@h2.com) Received: (qmail 39798 invoked by uid 1011); 10 May 2006 16:51:46 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO hanky) (192.168.1.3) by hermes.h2web.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 16:51:46 -0400 From: "Scott Hiemstra" To: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:54:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <44625052.3000602@calarts.edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZ0cuvusZdNUTS9TPOclukh+OiNcgAAJ/5A Message-Id: <20060510205147.0834443D6D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:51:51 -0000 For the stock freebsd ftpd, you should be able to change inetd.conf: FROM ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftpd ftpd -l TO ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftpd ftpd -l -a 127.0.0.1 I think that should work but untested. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sean Murphy > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 4:43 PM > To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' > Subject: Re: daemon to listen on localhost only? > > the ftp daemon that is started with inetd it is the ftp that > comes with > the freebsd system 5.4. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:52:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB8716B2A4 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:52:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar) Received: from smtp.unsam.edu.ar (smtp.unsam.edu.ar [170.210.48.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2554443D55 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:52:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar) Received: from omega.iib.unsam.edu.ar (omega.iib.unsam.edu.ar [192.168.10.14]) by smtp.unsam.edu.ar (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k4AKbeKq028170 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:37:40 -0300 (ART) (envelope-from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar) Received: from omega.iib.unsam.edu.ar (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by omega.iib.unsam.edu.ar (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4AKavok016260 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:36:57 -0300 (ART) (envelope-from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar) Received: (from fernan@localhost) by omega.iib.unsam.edu.ar (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k4AKavSv016257 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:36:57 -0300 (ART) (envelope-from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar) X-Authentication-Warning: omega.iib.unsam.edu.ar: fernan set sender to fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar using -f Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:36:56 -0300 From: Fernan Aguero To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20060510203656.GK44733@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Mail-Followup-To: Fernan Aguero , FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: arrange files and directories in CD-sized bins? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:52:45 -0000 Hi! I'm trying to help a FreeBSD user with a slow (dialup) link by providing him with CDs containing distfiles. My /usr/ports/distfiles directory holds 3.0Gb of data, and although I can generate a tarball and split it in multiples of 650MB or 700MB (the CD capacity) using split(1), I would much rather like to generate ~ 5 ISO images each containing the files. This way it'll be much easier for him to access it. Now, I can go on and manually arrange the distfiles so as to minimize the number of CDs needed ... but I thought that perhaps this could be automated in some way? Anyone know of a tool that given a list of files and directories with their sizes arranges them in lists of MAX XXX bytes? Fernan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:53:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F43316ABA3 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from viper@fx-services.com) Received: from mamata.fx-services.com (mamata.fx-services.com [193.238.27.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2F843D6D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:53:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from viper@fx-services.com) Received: from c83-250-235-77.bredband.comhem.se ([83.250.235.77] helo=[192.168.2.160]) by mamata.fx-services.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fdvgh-000LME-0N for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:53:40 +0200 Message-ID: <44625316.4050902@fx-services.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:54:46 +0200 From: Robin Vley User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2cd0a0da0605101331g345b9c44u970fbf5764db6f2c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0605101331g345b9c44u970fbf5764db6f2c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus-Scanner: Mail is Virus Free, FXS MailGateway X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mamata.fx-services.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - fx-services.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Help! FreeBSD Webserver with two NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:53:57 -0000 Maan Jee wrote: Hi! > At present, I have a 100/10 Mbps internet connection > (fiber-optics) but with this connection I cannot get Fixed IP for the > webserver. Sweet. Why-O-Why won't they give you a static IP on that line? :) Here (Sweden) we have full 100/100mbit to some appartment buildings WITH fixed IP. But basicly you can only pull/push 1mbit, since there is a 300GB traffic limit imposed. :) > So, I came to an idea that if I use two NICs, one NIC bounded to 100/10 > Mbps to serve the pages and one which would be bound with 24/1 Mbps > connection with Fixed-IP to litsen the requests.... > > my Question is that is it possible and if so, how? Not possible the easy way: you can't reply to a request from a different IP than the one the request was sent to due to TCP socket limitations. The clients expects an answer from IP x on the socket it opened, but instead receives "unknown" data on a new socket coming from IP Y. To get this working you would need a third fixed IP/machine somewhere and do tunneling with two channels combined. That way your inbound traffic would go via the fixed IP and the outbound via the big pipe. Giving me an idea right away: if you have any such point available close by with a fixed IP (some machine somewhere in a rack with good bandwidth): tunnel it to your home. But if you would have that, you wouldn't have the webserver at home anyway, would you? :) -- Robin Vley F/X Services Managed Hosting http://www.fx-services.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:54:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7875E16B39E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2C443D77 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:53:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FdvgX-00020d-27 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:53:29 +0200 Received: from r5j60.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.9.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:53:29 +0200 Received: from martinkov by r5j60.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:53:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:53:06 +0200 Lines: 46 Message-ID: <446252B2.3000802@pobox.sk> References: <445E8E0E.9030705@pobox.sk> <17502.44971.142792.538009@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5j60.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 In-Reply-To: <17502.44971.142792.538009@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Sender: news Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X11 6.9 issue -- option "ZAxisMapping" -- "4 5" vs "4 5 6 7" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:54:05 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > martinko writes: > >> i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and run into the >> following issue: > > I have had this: > >> if i scroll my mouse wheel too fast, i'm suddenly moving in history >> instead of scrolling the page. one quick finger movement is enough to >> trigger this. very annoying. > > happen for over a year using: > > huff@>> usbdevs -v > > port 2 addr 3: low speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Microsoft > IntelliMouse® Explorer(0x0095), Microsoft(0x045e), rev 4.24 > > and XF86Config: > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Buttons" "7" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > Option "Emulate3Buttons" > Option "ChordMiddle" > EndSection > > > Robert Huff > robert, i'm not sure i got it. do your options fix the issue pls? and, as i couldn't find them in xorg.conf(5), what do "Buttons" and "ChordMiddle" do ?? cheers, martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:56:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3062E16AC2B for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shiemstra@h2.com) Received: from hermes.h2web.com (mx1.h2web.com [67.132.72.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A505D43D70 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shiemstra@h2.com) Received: (qmail 40086 invoked by uid 1011); 10 May 2006 16:55:20 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO hanky) (192.168.1.3) by hermes.h2web.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 16:55:20 -0400 From: "Scott Hiemstra" To: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:57:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20060510205147.0834443D6D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZ0cuvusZdNUTS9TPOclukh+OiNcgAAJ/5AAAAwkSA= Message-Id: <20060510205606.A505D43D70@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:38 -0000 Actually, it would be: ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftpd ftpd -l -D -a 127.0.0.1 Sorry for the confusion, Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Scott Hiemstra > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 4:54 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: daemon to listen on localhost only? > > For the stock freebsd ftpd, you should be able to change inetd.conf: > FROM > ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftpd > ftpd -l > TO > ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftpd > ftpd -l -a > 127.0.0.1 > > I think that should work but untested. > > Scott > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Sean Murphy > > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 4:43 PM > > To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' > > Subject: Re: daemon to listen on localhost only? > > > > the ftp daemon that is started with inetd it is the ftp that > > comes with > > the freebsd system 5.4. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:56:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF41916AFCC for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D5143D98 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DB15D7B; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:56:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zty2LpYGZobz; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:56:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B895C95; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:56:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <44624E9C.3070102@calarts.edu> References: <44624631.9000503@calarts.edu> <4EB3F6F4-7F22-4F38-9C81-27A0A82F1984@mac.com> <44624E9C.3070102@calarts.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9EE8EBEC-4810-4BD9-9A79-3581FB5BD684@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:56:12 -0400 To: Sean Murphy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: daemon to listen on localhost only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:42 -0000 On May 10, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Sean Murphy wrote: > the ftp daemon that is started with inetd it is the ftp that comes > with the freebsd system 5.4. OK. "man ftpd" suggests the following options are relevant: -4 When -D is specified, accept connections via AF_INET4 socket. -6 When -D is specified, accept connections via AF_INET6 socket. -a When -D is specified, accept connections only on the specified address. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 20:56:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E86A16B018 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D67C43D78 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1DADDF5F; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:50:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:58:50 +0000 From: cpghost To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20060510205850.GA89428@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20060510223724.59bc096a.nick@nickwithers.com> <20060510152854.GA53391@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20060510174744.GD57941@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <20060510183314.GA33538@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060510183314.GA33538@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: fbsd , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" , Nick Withers Subject: Re: New freeBSD logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:42 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:33:14PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> Not everyone reads the questions list. Heck, not even all the >>> developers do, due to the low signal/noise ratio here. >> >> Uh-oh! A mindset like this would explain a lot of things. :-( >> >> Fortunately, there *are* developers here who do take users' >> questions seriously. > > You missed the point. > > Signal = questions from users about FreeBSD technical support. > > Noise = lots of whining about the logo. Kris, compared to the whole volume of technical questions, the logo-related threads/postings are an infinitely small part. I won't bother counting on- and off-topic postings in the last couple of months to show how high S/N really is here. > On the plus side, if you guys keep it up I'll be able to dramatically > improve my view of the S/N ratio by adding those with nothing better > to contribute than their indignation to my killfile (some are there > already) so I *can* focus on the user questions. Feel free to do so. You've been of great help on this list many times before (thank you), so I'll hate being on your killfile, even for tech questions. But since it's your spare time, I understand this. Bye, Kris. Keep up the excellent work. > Kris Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 21:05:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0C816A9AF for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB04643D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:05:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdvri-0003ii-5W for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:05:02 +0200 Received: from r5j60.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.9.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:05:02 +0200 Received: from martinkov by r5j60.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:05:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:55:37 +0200 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <00a301c6723d$4c1146d0$5ac8a8c0@loui> <445EAC05.7060605@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5j60.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 In-Reply-To: <445EAC05.7060605@daleco.biz> Sender: news Subject: Re: Writing to a mounted NTFS drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:05:24 -0000 Kevin Kinsey wrote: > GiL A. Virtucio wrote: >> Hi, I have a mounted an NTFS partition that is set as "rw" in fstab. I >> can >> read the data stored in the drive but I cannot store new files on that >> drive. Anybody here encountered this before? Or can anybody please >> suggest a way to make that drive writable? >> > > Yes; I imagine that *everybody* who has tried this has encountered > this (or something similar) before... > > If you RTF(riendly ;-)M, you'll see this: > > ---------------------------------- > WRITING > There is limited writing ability. Limitations: > file must be nonresident and must not contain any sparces > (uninitialized areas); compressed files are also not supported. > The file name must not contain multibyte characters. > ---------------------------------- > > A port exists (ntfsprogs) that *might* write NTFS a > tad better, but I'm not sure that it's at all guaranteed. > I'm certainly not going to do so ;-) > > IIRC, when you look up "proprietary" at Wikipedia, NTFS > is a synonym. :-D > > Kevin Kinsey > quite interesting.. http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 21:20:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA7316A58A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:20:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from os@odots.org) Received: from ikkefulltsaalilleole.odots.org (138.80-203-29.nextgentel.com [80.203.29.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8744843D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from os@odots.org) Received: from [10.0.4.4] (helo=[10.0.4.4]) by ikkefulltsaalilleole.odots.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fdw0l-0001lB-Lt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:14:23 +0200 Message-ID: <446259C5.5070709@odots.org> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:23:17 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind_Skaar?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060228 SeaMonkey/1.5a MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Promise SATA controller / Maxtor drive problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:20:31 -0000 >> The drive in question is a Maxtor 6B200M0. > These were Maxtor 6Y080M0 and 6Y160MO drives. Running under onboard SATA > or Highpoint Rocket Raid cards > The Maxtor drives were problematic for us from the start, and not even > heavy enough to make good door stops. So your no big Maxtor fan then? :) Do you think the drives had compatibility problems with the controller(s)? Or maybe a driver issue? Kind of hard to believe that so many drives are just faulty.. Btw, I used this drive with 5.4 release (It think) on another controller, but It was one of those cheap Sil controllers, and I got the usual* problems. Anyone know what these checks refer to? > ad4: Maxtor 6B200M0 BANC1B70 > ad4: 398297088 sectors [395136C/16H/63S] 16 sectors/intrupts 1 depth queue > ad4: Promise check1 failed > ad4: Adaptec check1 failed > ad4: LSI (v3) check1 failed > ad4: LSI (v2) check1 failed > ad4: FreeBSD check1 failed > GEOM: new disk ad4 ø *Failing under heavy load, DMA write problems etc.. -- Øyvind Skaar | os aaaa odots.org | 482 78 480 | http://odots.org http://last.fm/user/%67%69%7A%7A%6C%6Fn | http://43things.com/person/%C3%B8s 6865792c207768617420646f20796f75206b6e6f772c 796f752772652061206e65726420746f6f202e2e From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 21:22:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3ECE16A579 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:22:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06C843D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:22:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2545CDDD84; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:17:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:26:06 +0000 From: cpghost To: Ceri Davies Message-ID: <20060510212606.GC89428@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20060509105647.GA89879@epia2.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Kep Woof , questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:22:43 -0000 On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:04:31PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > On 9/5/06 11:56, "cpghost" wrote: > > > Semi-seriously, www@: how about offering people a chance to individually > > customize that logo away? It's not really THAT important, but setting > > up a transparent proxy just to filter that banner out is kind of silly > > waste of time. > > Specify your own stylesheet, move along. Not a bad idea; thanks for that! Will try [User-CSS, I mean ;-)]. Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:10:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC0E16A486 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A6643D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:10:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-102-190.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.102.190]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 May 2006 18:11:16 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,111,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="201752154:sNHT26831032" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17506.25550.530788.418002@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:06:06 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 In-Reply-To: <446252B2.3000802@pobox.sk> References: <445E8E0E.9030705@pobox.sk> <17502.44971.142792.538009@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <446252B2.3000802@pobox.sk> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta26) "endive" XEmacs Lucid Cc: Subject: Re: X11 6.9 issue -- option "ZAxisMapping" -- "4 5" vs "4 5 6 7" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:10:33 -0000 martinko writes: > Robert Huff wrote: > > martinko writes: > > > >> i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and run into the > >> following issue: > > > > I have had this: > > robert, i'm not sure i got it. > do your options fix the issue pls? No. They do, however, establish additional conditions under which the same problem happens, which may be useful for more capable folks attempting to diagnose the root cause(s). > and, as i couldn't find them in xorg.conf(5), what do "Buttons" > and "ChordMiddle" do ?? They are, apparently, obselete. The file was originally generated by XFree86, and has not had more than minor adjustments since. I included the entire section for diagnostic purposes. "ChordMiddle" was an option for two-button mice, in which clicking both buttons simultaneously would cause the software to simulate a middle-button click. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:25:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB9C16A74E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5634D43D5C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:25:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdx7f-0001d8-4j for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:25:35 +0200 Received: from r5j60.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.9.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:25:35 +0200 Received: from martinkov by r5j60.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:25:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:25:27 +0200 Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <445F64BF.7030903@pobox.sk> <445F6A9E.4000702@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5j60.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 In-Reply-To: <445F6A9E.4000702@u.washington.edu> Sender: news Subject: Re: seamonkey -- building calendar (option) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:25:41 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > martinko wrote: >> hello! >> >> i've just upgraded from mozilla (1.7.12) to seamonkey (1.0.1) and >> discovered the following issue: >> >> there's WITH_CALENDAR make switch in the port which is/was supposed to >> turn building of mozilla with calendar module. i've been happily using >> it with mozilla suite. the switch is still in seamonkey's makefile but i >> haven't got calendar module after compilation of the port. :-( >> >> /note that i'm running seamonkey on freebsd 6.1-rc, after just >> reinstalling all my ports from scratch./ >> >> any thoughts or suggestions pls ?? >> >> cheers, >> >> martin >> > For now you can just download the extension from Mozilla's site > . > -Garrett garrett, have you actually tried it pls ? i'm asking because, on my work laptop running winxp, i upgraded from mozilla to seamonkey and therefore i had to upgrade calendar extension too, at which point i found out it is not functional at all (and eventually i had to reinstall seamonkey to get rid of it). m. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:35:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7095416A400; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A74943D48; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:35:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4AMZQJ4047433; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:35:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <44626AA9.5030701@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:35:21 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: martinko References: <445E8E0E.9030705@pobox.sk> <17502.44971.142792.538009@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <446252B2.3000802@pobox.sk> In-Reply-To: <446252B2.3000802@pobox.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X11 6.9 issue -- option "ZAxisMapping" -- "4 5" vs "4 5 6 7" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:35:29 -0000 martinko wrote: > Robert Huff wrote: >> martinko writes: >> >>> i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and run into the >>> following issue: >> I have had this: >> >>> if i scroll my mouse wheel too fast, i'm suddenly moving in history >>> instead of scrolling the page. one quick finger movement is enough to >>> trigger this. very annoying. > > robert, i'm not sure i got it. > do your options fix the issue pls? > I had some problem very recently that sounds similar. I came to the conclusion that xorg wasn't playing nice with moused(8), which I run for console use. Killing moused before entering a X session is my current workaround. I need to find time to look into it more, but .... May or may not be the same issue; I wholeheartedly agree with 'very annoying', though! KDK > and, as i couldn't find them in xorg.conf(5), what do "Buttons" and > "ChordMiddle" do ?? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:37:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A9C16A848 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7579543D5A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:37:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FdxJM-0003H9-2G for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:37:40 +0200 Received: from r5j60.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.9.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:37:40 +0200 Received: from martinkov by r5j60.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:37:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:37:33 +0200 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060509104913.02ea3dc8@mailsvr.xxiii.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5j60.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:37:59 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > On 9/5/06 15:57, "wc_fbsd@xxiii.com" wrote: > >> At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote: >>> I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so >>> is the font they've started to use since the announcement of >>> FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At >> Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint. >> >> But if you're trying to "sell" FreeBSD to a boss or customer, a >> serious, business-like web site surely helps. The new one seems to >> borrow too much from the "hax0r" community's appearance. >> >> And the font overflows and looks like complete shit on my >> browser; usually this would just be blamed on using a "Non Microsoft >> Browser" (FireFox on windoze) but until we have IE for FBSD, it seems >> a legit complaint. > > The font overflows? We didn't change the font. > > Ceri well, i would expect the page to scale somehow better when i try to increase font size in mozilla. but if it can't even render properly when i choose "officially" via "large" text size option right on the page, then i must conclude it's not good and not ready for the public. :-( martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:43:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C201A16A8DB for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A461E43D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:43:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdxOt-00021z-09; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:43:28 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:43:22 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: martinko , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZ0gyP9YmkRVeB2EdqadAAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:43:33 -0000 On 10/5/06 23:37, "martinko" wrote: > Ceri Davies wrote: >> On 9/5/06 15:57, "wc_fbsd@xxiii.com" wrote: >> >>> At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote: >>>> I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so >>>> is the font they've started to use since the announcement of >>>> FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At >>> Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint. >>> >>> But if you're trying to "sell" FreeBSD to a boss or customer, a >>> serious, business-like web site surely helps. The new one seems to >>> borrow too much from the "hax0r" community's appearance. >>> >>> And the font overflows and looks like complete shit on my >>> browser; usually this would just be blamed on using a "Non Microsoft >>> Browser" (FireFox on windoze) but until we have IE for FBSD, it seems >>> a legit complaint. >> >> The font overflows? We didn't change the font. >> >> Ceri > > well, i would expect the page to scale somehow better when i try to > increase font size in mozilla. but if it can't even render properly when > i choose "officially" via "large" text size option right on the page, > then i must conclude it's not good and not ready for the public. :-( That's an issue for www@ -> over there. It also has nothing to do with the logo. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:45:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549C216A8F5 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3BC43D6A for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:45:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FdxQU-0004LY-64 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:45:02 +0200 Received: from r5j60.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.9.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:45:02 +0200 Received: from martinkov by r5j60.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:45:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:44:50 +0200 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5j60.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:45:15 -0000 jad@nominet.org.uk wrote: > owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17: > >> hi, >> >> On 5/9/06, Bill Moran wrote: >> >>> Then take this to chat@freebsd.org. It's just flame bait here. >> I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended >> up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think it's a big joke? >> The new logo already looks dated, and will only get worse with time. >> > > This happened ages ago and was announced in the news section of the > website > > See - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ > > John it was only announced after the selection was over. freebsd users were not involved. this is not right. :-( also, the other entries were not published. so we can't really compare. it seems like the whole thing was intended to be quiet and public was just left out of the process. martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:46:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF30F16A9E8 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc3910@pcisys.net) Received: from marsha.pcisys.net (marsha.pcisys.net [216.229.32.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA0043D62 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:46:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc3910@pcisys.net) Received: from [192.168.0.55] (dsl-ppp-206-53-23-173.cos.pcisys.net [206.53.23.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by marsha.pcisys.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4AMjrVY013244 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:46:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <44626D1F.4030307@pcisys.net> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:45:51 -0600 From: bc User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060402 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 6.1_RELEASE Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:46:10 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: >On 10/5/06 05:03, "bc" wrote: > > > >>After make installworld I ran the final run thru of mergemaster and recived >>this error: >> >>ERROR CODE 64 >>FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'dc' into /usr/src/etc/ and install files to the >>temproot environment. >> >> > >Did you cut and paste that, or copy it in manually? > >Ceri > > Now that I am in front of the derver here is the full message (with a few lines before) pasted: install -o root -g wheel -m 640 /dev/null /var/tmp/temproot/var/log/sendmail.st install -o root -g wheel -m 644 freebsd.cf /var/tmp/temproot/etc/mail/sendmail.cf install -o root -g wheel -m 444 freebsd.submit.cf /var/tmp/temproot/etc/mail/submit.cf cd /usr/src/etc; install -o root -g wheel -m 644 /var/tmp/temproot/etc/ssh usage: install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 file2 install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... *** Error code 64 Stop in /usr/src/etc. *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src/etc and install files to the temproot environment /usr/src Walnut SuperUser#> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:51:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E2816A530 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A70843D4C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:51:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: (qmail 98819 invoked by uid 0); 10 May 2006 22:51:35 -0000 Received: from r5j60.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?86.49.9.60?) (86.49.9.60) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 10 May 2006 22:51:34 -0000 Message-ID: <44626E75.1050608@pobox.sk> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:51:33 +0200 From: martinko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ceri Davies , www@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:51:39 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > On 10/5/06 23:37, "martinko" wrote: > > >> Ceri Davies wrote: >> >>> On 9/5/06 15:57, "wc_fbsd@xxiii.com" wrote: >>> >>> >>>> At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so >>>>> is the font they've started to use since the announcement of >>>>> FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At >>>>> >>>> Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint. >>>> >>>> But if you're trying to "sell" FreeBSD to a boss or customer, a >>>> serious, business-like web site surely helps. The new one seems to >>>> borrow too much from the "hax0r" community's appearance. >>>> >>>> And the font overflows and looks like complete shit on my >>>> browser; usually this would just be blamed on using a "Non Microsoft >>>> Browser" (FireFox on windoze) but until we have IE for FBSD, it seems >>>> a legit complaint. >>>> >>> The font overflows? We didn't change the font. >>> >>> Ceri >>> >> well, i would expect the page to scale somehow better when i try to >> increase font size in mozilla. but if it can't even render properly when >> i choose "officially" via "large" text size option right on the page, >> then i must conclude it's not good and not ready for the public. :-( >> > > That's an issue for www@ -> over there. It also has nothing to do with the > logo. > > Ceri > sure, i was replying on rendering issue ("font overflows"). anyway, i'm sending this to www@ as you suggested. martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 23:04:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AED16A4E9 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60012.mail.yahoo.com (web60012.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B83F43D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:04:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 40066 invoked by uid 60001); 10 May 2006 23:04:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gu2KwRhgFPwo59TIbm3ShmtHwnBBY7Oa6vCoIISfvW6z6ZuCnhXdI5kOEaJ+oufNcSKaklq+r3HgkVSlCJzoN/6hOZGst2JNLE4Xh/Pkk3dMmgk9dageQreQ274GutqzfCLE/cRLmzrQNQF6UIF7GwaML/dxxsmTfk4pebTh3/0= ; Message-ID: <20060510230414.40064.qmail@web60012.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.81.189.3] by web60012.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:04:14 EDT Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:04:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: dueling ports: pcre and pcre-utf8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:04:17 -0000 I am having trouble upgrading my ports because my 5.4 system wants to install both pcre and pcre-utf8 but the ports themselves complain when they see the other installed. How do I get around this dilemma? Peter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 23:07:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF49816A71E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3820243D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:07:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FdxmQ-0000A5-JO for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:07:42 +0200 Received: from r5j60.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.9.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:07:42 +0200 Received: from martinkov by r5j60.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:07:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:07:31 +0200 Lines: 68 Message-ID: References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5j60.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060506 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:07:53 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:20 +0000 > "Kep Woof" wrote: > > [snip] > >> Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It >> means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the >> users) seem to have ended up with is a fussy and unelegent logo that >> has nothing to do with anythin, save for a pair of post-modern ice >> cream cones harking back to beastie. > > My brother went to school for graphic arts. When the contest was > announced, we spend _several_weeks_ brainstorming, he and I, trying > to come up with something that looked as cool as the NetBSD logo, while > representing FreeBSD. > > We finally gave up without making a submission. The problem is that > NetBSD (and OpenBSD as well, for that matter) somehow have more culture > to them on the graphic arts side. NetBSD has long had the image of > daemons raising the flag (mirroring the WWII photograph) which > translated nicely into a logo. OpenBSD has long had the Blowfish, > which can be rendered a number of interesting ways. > > And FreeBSD has what? The Beastie ... but the Beastie is *BSD in > general, so what else is there ... ? > >> The simple fact is, when you look at the new logo it only makes sense >> if you previously understand what it represents. The effect is that >> it represents nothing in particular, which is why it fails so >> fantasically. What are the key values of FreeBSD? I'd guess >> something like Freedom, Stability, Robustness, quality. Those values >> are not communicated in the new logo, and I think that's something >> that somebody with freebsd.org in their email address should seriously >> address. > > You're exactly right. Somebody other than you should take care of this. > This is everyone's fault but yours. If you'd been in the loop from the > start, this never would have happened. My goodness, why didn't we > consult you earlier ... you obviously have all the answers. > > This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it > yourself. If you can't fix it, _ask_ someone else, or put up some > cash to pay someone who can. But quit whining. > > You are a Troll. If you weren't a Troll, you'd have taken this to > chat@freebsd.org or advocacy@freebsd.org instead of staying on this > list. bill, i'm afraid, this is not quite true. as for me, for instance, i had some objections and comments on logo and font as originally published. but i didn't get any serious responses on mailing lists. later i tried to get in touch with the creator and/or responsible people but to no avail. clearly, in this case it hasn't been easy for community to reach the right people nor it has been easy to influence the whole selection and stuff. m:( > > Go use Microsoft, they pay professional graphic artists big bucks to > design their logos and their marketing materials, and you fund that > with your Windows license fees. > > Or, _contribute_ something back to the wonderful free software > community other than a lengthy email thread of whining. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 23:34:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E226416A4D9 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beyert@cs.ucr.edu) Received: from sentinel.ucr.edu (sentinel.ucr.edu [138.23.226.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A685743D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:34:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beyert@cs.ucr.edu) Received: from aeonserv.aeonnet (24-180-52-82.dhcp.rvsd.ca.charter.com [24.180.52.82]) by sentinel.ucr.edu (MOS 3.5.9-GR) with ESMTP id DTV24496 (AUTH tbeye001) for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:36:15 -0700 Message-ID: <87k68tv4eo.wl%beyert@cs.ucr.edu> From: Timothy Beyer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.5 (beta23) (daikon) (i386--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Junkmail-Status: score=17/65, host=sentinel.ucr.edu Subject: Swap Performance in 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:34:25 -0000 I am curious if this problem has been resolved in 6.1: (it was previously on the FreeBSD 6.1 Open Issues page, but I don't see it there any more) http://www.tr.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html swapping on 6.0 is slower than on 4.x Not done "Performance on swap handling is much slower than 4.x and this can make a system essentially unusable when moderate paging activity is going on" Has this been resolved, (I did not see anything about it in the 6.1 release notes, or the errata) or has it been deferred to a future release? (The reason why I ask this is that programs like Firefox and Xemacs use up all of my 1 GB of memory and I have noticed problems of this nature in 6.0) Thanks everyone. Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 00:20:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127D016A405 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCED43D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:20:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from [198.182.157.171] (not-in-use.calarts.edu [198.182.157.171] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4B0KEWZ086982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:20:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <44628357.3020402@calarts.edu> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:20:39 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 Subject: ftp server with no shell accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:20:16 -0000 I tried the default ftp server with FreeBSD 5.4 and users with no shell accounts but it does not work. Does anyone know of a ftp server that users would still have home directories but no shell access /sbin/nologin and that could still upload files to there home directories. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 00:27:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A158E16A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3181843D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so49696nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BGzcojKyc7JiQ+e4VuB0B28ZqjNK93YiKbuJiJjbytP/ydO+xCL8VHjiGj5NVQfm5N0YjkwTszoR+ZxPVUBZnGSIJ7hnO6wynDZRT+gNO9eOC9KFUnro6OSouPbUVq6JvJur/VBqnpogWooGvzb89hChzWlB+BJ3ynk/PBc9M70= Received: by 10.65.250.11 with SMTP id c11mr124971qbs; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:27:21 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: "Sean Murphy" In-Reply-To: <44628357.3020402@calarts.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44628357.3020402@calarts.edu> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ftp server with no shell accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:27:22 -0000 On 5/10/06, Sean Murphy wrote: > I tried the default ftp server with FreeBSD 5.4 and users with no shell > accounts but it does not work. > > Does anyone know of a ftp server that users would still have home > directories but no shell access /sbin/nologin and that could still > upload files to there home directories. > I use the scponly shell. -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 00:38:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D535316A404 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from pinnacle.akherb.com (60-105-237-24.gci.net [24.237.105.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF94543D5E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:38:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 667145DA7; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:38:05 -0800 (AKDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pinnacle.akherb.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 Received: from [192.168.241.106] (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787975D09; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:38:04 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:37:47 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <44628357.3020402@calarts.edu> In-Reply-To: <44628357.3020402@calarts.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart38263113.odDkc6YzI7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605101638.01971.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Sean Murphy Subject: Re: ftp server with no shell accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:38:07 -0000 --nextPart38263113.odDkc6YzI7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 10 May 2006 16:20, Sean Murphy wrote: > I tried the default ftp server with FreeBSD 5.4 and users with no shell > accounts but it does not work. > > Does anyone know of a ftp server that users would still have home > directories but no shell access /sbin/nologin and that could still > upload files to there home directories. Try proftpd in the ports. Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart38263113.odDkc6YzI7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEYodpp5D0B1NlT4URAqnFAJ9mAGZKDy0956pMLDAjiJEe3u8MhwCfe7PD 0SDT9elFkZh9yLSSIk92MhM= =3E54 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart38263113.odDkc6YzI7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 00:53:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417A516A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LukeD@pobox.com) Received: from proof.pobox.com (proof.pobox.com [207.106.133.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79E343D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:53:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LukeD@pobox.com) Received: from proof (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by proof.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23E02399F; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:53:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from border.crystalsphere.multiverse (pool-71-112-204-105.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.112.204.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proof.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1684162C; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:53:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:53:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Luke Dean X-X-Sender: lukas@border.crystalsphere.multiverse To: bc In-Reply-To: <44626D1F.4030307@pcisys.net> Message-ID: <20060510174502.D5513@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> References: <44626D1F.4030307@pcisys.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1_RELEASE Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Luke Dean List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:53:39 -0000 On Wed, 10 May 2006, bc wrote: > Ceri Davies wrote: > >> On 10/5/06 05:03, "bc" wrote: >> >> >>> After make installworld I ran the final run thru of mergemaster and >>> recived >>> this error: >>> >>> ERROR CODE 64 >>> FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'dc' into /usr/src/etc/ and install files to the >>> temproot environment. >>> >> >> Did you cut and paste that, or copy it in manually? >> >> Ceri >> > Now that I am in front of the derver here is the full message (with a few > lines before) pasted: > > install -o root -g wheel -m 640 /dev/null > /var/tmp/temproot/var/log/sendmail.st > install -o root -g wheel -m 644 freebsd.cf > /var/tmp/temproot/etc/mail/sendmail.cf > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 freebsd.submit.cf > /var/tmp/temproot/etc/mail/submit.cf > cd /usr/src/etc; install -o root -g wheel -m 644 /var/tmp/temproot/etc/ssh > usage: install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] > [-o owner] file1 file2 > install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] > [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory > install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... > *** Error code 64 > > Stop in /usr/src/etc. > > *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src/etc and install files to > the temproot environment > > /usr/src Walnut SuperUser#> "install" is being run with a blank space where the program name should be. That's what it's complaining about. It does not look like a directory problem or a permissions problem. I'd say that something is wrong with a makefile that builds ssh or with your "make" configuration. I'm afraid I don't know enough about the "make" process to say more than that, but perhaps if you can specify which platform you're building for and the contents of /etc/make.conf somebody more knowledgable might be able to help. Luke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 00:59:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F260B16A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:59:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0AC43D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:59:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 2971 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 10:59:40 +1000 Received: from 210-84-51-24.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (210.84.51.24) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 11 May 2006 10:59:40 +1000 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:59:34 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Alastair Rankine Message-ID: <20060511105934.76e4dad7@localhost> In-Reply-To: <3655B84C-03FA-454B-A601-72DCEE8AE4E7@optusnet.com.au> References: <3655B84C-03FA-454B-A601-72DCEE8AE4E7@optusnet.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem corruption when drives are mirrored, but not otherwise X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:59:42 -0000 On Wed, 10 May 2006 22:45:10 +1000 Alastair Rankine wrote: > Disabling write > caching seems to have fixed the problem. excuse my ignorance, but where do you do this? BIOS? I'm running GEOM mirrors on amd64 with SATA (I assume you mean PATA when you say ATA). cheers, Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 01:05:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C56416A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49C143D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:05:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so62810uge for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:05:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Wb559LUDzLPNMEK/kXUk46lKbt0mhQffagy4/QmtESjZIYkrzUKqOhTV4dYuQoXiXPpvX2RwrEtS4cVZ1sY3iABljZuGMDfp/41gg8G9K0ATQ3HMu8/zl44tLlUpUWMbKwes4PyVGWQCATGm0RYY2L/d97gSwWnpI3iSOhUuAdE= Received: by 10.66.6.29 with SMTP id 29mr174016ugf; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.239.16 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710605101805n79c111f5xfd7fcd08cad9ffc4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:05:07 -0400 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "Beech Rintoul" In-Reply-To: <200605101638.01971.beech@alaskaparadise.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44628357.3020402@calarts.edu> <200605101638.01971.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Sean Murphy Subject: Re: ftp server with no shell accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:05:10 -0000 I much prefer the pure-ftpd implementation of virtual users. However, both will get the job done effectively. The only reason I really prefer pure over pro is that pure has never had one root exploit found since release number 1. That's reason enough for me :) On 5/10/06, Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Wednesday 10 May 2006 16:20, Sean Murphy wrote: > > I tried the default ftp server with FreeBSD 5.4 and users with no shell > > accounts but it does not work. > > > > Does anyone know of a ftp server that users would still have home > > directories but no shell access /sbin/nologin and that could still > > upload files to there home directories. > > Try proftpd in the ports. > > Beech > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------- > Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com > /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise > \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 > X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 > / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 01:17:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E1C16A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: from bigbird.whtech.com (bigbird.whtech.com [64.125.72.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E995F43D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:17:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: (qmail 43649 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2006 01:17:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mickey) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 11 May 2006 01:17:18 -0000 From: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:17:18 -0700 Message-ID: <005a01c67498$a54a2a70$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcZ0mKUcvbPm6A7STk6j6vEQPJSG7Q== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Subject: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:17:19 -0000 Hi all... I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I do this: tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files of 0 length, rather than re-established as links. What am I doing wrong here, or is my tar broken? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 01:22:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8445216A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Received: from web51610.mail.yahoo.com (web51610.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2EE943D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:22:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 12064 invoked by uid 60001); 11 May 2006 01:22:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ubzDNpOoPFaMBQAkeELFACd6r2pDxE1BgAhkqBziPu3W9KCr+Xpl9145/A5xOV/iQQO3NB2DxvVxfpEmklnqYgAzg79RKTkxKBiy4NdxjDSLXxbhL3Kv6Ta1rtVIopZVMT2x8bfDCVASA0jeUnNb4Gk77zPNsCgxI80HjLRYpdA= ; Message-ID: <20060511012211.12062.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.90.128.5] by web51610.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:22:11 PDT Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:22:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Jayson Alvarez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Is it recommended to allow all outgoing connections from your firewall?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:22:12 -0000 Hi, I've seen most people allow all outgoing traffic originating from the firewall itself... Is this really recommended?? What if the machine have been compromised and the intruder have installed a program that let's him access the machine remotely by having the program itself to initiate the outgoing connection to him thus defying the incoming connection firewall ruleset... Thanks.. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 01:23:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD58716A404 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7278F43D60 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so67173uge for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:23:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F7YdCyelxFnF3L4ZfiVOB2KBqwIZlppagDXlR2VUn1oQ3ARDcdnVijVcS3kFKX3oZIPyHEeEeE3M9NaVb3YDXr3NOE2AEYRl+GzwtjXmEVFrGXYAjGe2dYBPGhc9q8+Pehz4b8Pla2Kpi0PvaE4NK2/MZpcJSRHvxVh0kbm4chg= Received: by 10.67.15.3 with SMTP id s3mr47754ugi; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.239.16 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710605101823p56f2cdd9j4510cbc268448d05@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:23:45 -0400 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "Don O'Neil" In-Reply-To: <005a01c67498$a54a2a70$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <005a01c67498$a54a2a70$0300020a@mickey> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:23:47 -0000 # man tar specifically, the -L option On 5/10/06, Don O'Neil wrote: > Hi all... > > I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I do > this: > > tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) > > It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files of 0 > length, rather than re-established as links. > > What am I doing wrong here, or is my tar broken? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 01:24:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ED816A458 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CFB43D5F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:24:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so67173uge for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:24:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=mmFhNMxjXNy4DUOJf5kRkfcRcB0VFLRNK0/PlmYJpTwNuxPZsd6qccVV+KlwcA45XXRgERgc+amu6xxtq5XyVfiowTBG9T5BBaFVjoXiGjc32HewpeO9wiYUO4zeQvRVWW89TaP1fdS+VV/3+zbH4Qijmu5ODJyQbYOTGDdfYcw= Received: by 10.66.216.6 with SMTP id o6mr47949ugg; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:17:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.15.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:17:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:17:42 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4a25a7bd3ae3a26f Subject: setting up a NAT gateway with PPPoE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:24:14 -0000 People, I have just set up my 5.4 box as a gateway to my DSL connection. I used this section of the freebsd handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html I enabled NAT on the PPP connection, and viola, it works. I still have to set up my firewall, but I'm curious about how natd works. Looking here http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-natd.html I tried to run natd, but I got an error that the socket type was not supported. Do I really need to recompile the GENERIC kernel in 5.4 to support NAT? I'm also unclear about how to tell natd which local networks to NAT. Also, why is NAT capability in both PPP and natd? If you hadn't noticed, I'm confused. :) Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 01:26:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DC016A445 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D241143D6D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:26:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so81726pye for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:26:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ft20TeIMK4znntFyCyGHgUCgWKHVhI96Lx94TYYnYGA7UPV7/MZxlYh9fnIWocdX176eBf1QTYIJT6uaX76ZLFHzLrRsiJPUf3V/0/2mtbid6tHL3EvdirEeZMSqWS00YcJ9kesPgepzVvnlBLdgjjbcaN9btjMnzC69Zw4hSuE= Received: by 10.35.96.11 with SMTP id y11mr375937pyl; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.43.16 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:26:08 -0400 From: "Pablo Mora" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: limit bandwidth 'make fetch' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:26:09 -0000 how i can limit bandwidth when i using 'make fetch' (make install in Ports)= ? thanks in advance. -- Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft. BSD is for people who love Unix ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 01:28:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0309C16A4D7 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: from bigbird.whtech.com (bigbird.whtech.com [64.125.72.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CCA343D6E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:28:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: (qmail 52922 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2006 01:28:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mickey) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 11 May 2006 01:28:07 -0000 From: "Don O'Neil" To: "'Andy Greenwood'" Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:28:06 -0700 Message-ID: <007601c6749a$28057630$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcZ0mYxXy2FnpwciTHyi/ogILPdZ6wAAFx2w X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: <3ee9ca710605101823p56f2cdd9j4510cbc268448d05@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:28:08 -0000 My man says: -L number --tape-length number Change tapes after writing number * 1024 bytes. Nothing about symbolic links.... Now there is an option --unlink-first and --dereference... Both of which don't copy the links, but unlink or copy the actual source file. Don -----Original Message----- From: Andy Greenwood [mailto:greenwood.andy@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:24 PM To: Don O'Neil Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. # man tar specifically, the -L option On 5/10/06, Don O'Neil wrote: > Hi all... > > I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I > do > this: > > tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) > > It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files of > 0 length, rather than re-established as links. > > What am I doing wrong here, or is my tar broken? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 01:30:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134F216A419 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8279643D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:30:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1Fe00c-000FzZ-6d by authid for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:30:30 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:30:30 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511013029.GA5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060511012211.12062.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060511012211.12062.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Is it recommended to allow all outgoing connections from your firewall?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:30:32 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:22:11PM -0700, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I've seen most people allow all outgoing traffic > originating from the firewall itself... Is this really > recommended?? What if the machine have been > compromised and the intruder have installed a program > that let's him access the machine remotely by having > the program itself to initiate the outgoing connection > to him thus defying the incoming connection firewall > ruleset... If that's of concern to you (and it is, I reckon, a valid concern), then you should certainly look into blocking outgoing connections from your firewall. It depends on what you consider to be acceptable risk. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYpO1ixf5fBYiFmoRAnOaAJ4rbgppGR0YkVAn4/cedLMlMMJ/yACferib 1ZWk28rtukBHB9PA+SGfMqc= =TAii -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 01:55:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9528216A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447CC43D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:55:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-65-65-211-42.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.65.211.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3683E114307 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:50:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:56:15 -0500 From: pauls@utdallas.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <6B0EC275D1AE8D66D26A2093@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <20060511012211.12062.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060511012211.12062.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========00492A532B22D0C1F702==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Is it recommended to allow all outgoing connections from your firewall?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:55:54 -0000 --==========00492A532B22D0C1F702========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On May 10, 2006 6:22:11 PM -0700 Mark Jayson Alvarez =20 wrote: > > I've seen most people allow all outgoing traffic > originating from the firewall itself... Is this really > recommended?? What if the machine have been > compromised and the intruder have installed a program > that let's him access the machine remotely by having > the program itself to initiate the outgoing connection > to him thus defying the incoming connection firewall > ruleset... > Because if the machine has been compromised, it doesn't *matter* what the=20 outgoing ruleset is. Or what anything else is, for that matter. If I hack your box, one of the first things I'm going to do is install a=20 rootkit. Then I'm going to wipe the logs of any evidence of my entry (but=20 leave them intact otherwise), clean my tracks from the shell history file=20 and remove any other evidence of my presence. "Bypassing" your firewall=20 rules is the least of my worries. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========00492A532B22D0C1F702==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 02:01:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6C716A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5185943D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:01:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4B212pj064436; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:01:02 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 63951-03-3; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:01:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com ([10.0.0.4]) by wolf.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4B20r4M064410; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:00:54 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmailmel.bytecraft.internal (Not Verified[10.0.0.24]) by svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com with MailMarshal (v5, 0, 3, 78) id ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:00:53 +1000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:00:54 +1000 Message-ID: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F117C995@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. Thread-Index: AcZ0mbnAy8bMNKk+SaWiSuq3aPAh2gABMVNg From: "Murray Taylor" To: "Andy Greenwood" , "Don O'Neil" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:01:07 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Andy Greenwood > Sent: Thursday, 11 May 2006 11:24 AM > To: Don O'Neil > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links=20 > not copied right. >=20 > # man tar >=20 > specifically, the -L option >=20 > On 5/10/06, Don O'Neil wrote: > > Hi all... > > > > I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another,=20 > and when I=20 > > do > > this: > > > > tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) > > > > It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied=20 > as files of=20 > > 0 length, rather than re-established as links. > > > > What am I doing wrong here, or is my tar broken? > > to preserve symlinks you need to use cpio specifically the -p and -l options man cpio It is a bit of a read .... Murray Taylor Special Projects Engineer Bytecraft Systems P: +61 3 8710 2555 F: +61 3 8710 2599 D: +61 3 9238 4275 E: mtaylor@bytecraft.com.au=20 -- "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." =20 Albert Einstein=20 --=20 --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material.=20 E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- ***This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal.*** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 02:02:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A78416A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2590C43D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:02:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4B22V61048537; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:02:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <44629B31.1090006@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:02:25 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Don O'Neil" References: <007601c6749a$28057630$0300020a@mickey> In-Reply-To: <007601c6749a$28057630$0300020a@mickey> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 'Andy Greenwood' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:02:33 -0000 > On 5/10/06, Don O'Neil wrote: >> >> tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) >> >> It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files of >> 0 length, rather than re-established as links. >> >> What am I doing wrong here, or is my tar broken? > From: Andy Greenwood [mailto:greenwood.andy@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:24 PM > To: Don O'Neil > > # man tar > > specifically, the -L option Don O'Neil wrote: > My man says: > > -L number > --tape-length number Change tapes after writing number * 1024 bytes. > > Nothing about symbolic links.... Now there is an option --unlink-first and > --dereference... Both of which don't copy the links, but unlink or copy the > actual source file. > > Don > > And again: >> What am I doing wrong here, or is my tar broken? Heh, heh, could be. Andy is referring to "BSDtar", which is tar(1) on later releases, and your -L option is from "GNUtar", which is tar(1) on, IIRC, 4.X and elder, and is now available in ports as gtar. As for what's really the problem, I can't say as I can tell. On my 6.X box, everything works as expected. For fun, I shelled into a 4.11 box, and everything works as expected, both my tests and your example. Maybe your tar *is* broken. Or, more likely, we're both a tad dense ATM. Kevin Kinsey -- What foods these morsels be! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 02:05:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13F216A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:05:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wbs@infowest.com) Received: from tozar.infowest.com (tozar.out.smtp.infowest.com [204.17.177.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D892D43D5C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:05:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wbs@infowest.com) Received: from marbella.infowest.com (marbella.client.smtp.infowest.com [204.17.177.60]) by tozar.infowest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794E72475C5 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:05:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (71-213-95-210.slkc.qwest.net [71.213.95.210]) by marbella.infowest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43859A112C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:05:56 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <44629BFA.3070009@infowest.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:05:46 -0600 From: Lorin Lund User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44612BFB.4080705@infowest.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Lock up during install on Compaq Presario notebook with Turion chip - Disabling ACPI doesn't help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:05:58 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 5/9/06, Lorin Lund wrote: > >> I have tried installing 6.0-RELEASE for x64 and 6.1-RELEASE for i386. >> They both >> lock up. Below I have transcribed the information showing on the screen >> when it stops: >> >> I'm open to any suggestions/pointers. >> >> atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 >> atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >> kbd0 at atkbd0 >> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 >> psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 >> acpi-acad0: on acpi0 >> battery0: on acpi0 >> pmtimer0 on isa0 >> orm0: at iomem >> 0xc0000-0xcffff,0xd0000-0xd0fff,0xdc000-0xdffff,0xe0000-0xe3fff on isa0 >> ppc0: parallel port not found. >> sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 >> sc0: VGA <16 virttual consoles, flags=0x300> >> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >> sio0: port may not be enabled >> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 >> sio0: type 8250 or not responding >> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 >> sio1: port may not be enabled >> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-ixbffff on >> isa0 >> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1794786721 Hz quality 800 >> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec >> >> > > Disable ACPI tried that. Still locks up at same place. When I tried verbose it showed 2 more lines after the Timecounters line: lo0: bpf attached rr232x: no controller detected That was with 6.1-RELEASE i386. When I try it with 6.0-RELEASE x64 and select 'verbose' the last two lines are: Linux ELF exec handler installed lo0: bpf attached > > > > -- > BSD Podcasts @: > http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ > http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 02:21:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808B816A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D53543D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:21:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k4B2LVaW024455; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:21:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:21:31 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: "Don O'Neil" Message-ID: <20060511022131.GC76653@dan.emsphone.com> References: <005a01c67498$a54a2a70$0300020a@mickey> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005a01c67498$a54a2a70$0300020a@mickey> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:21:32 -0000 In the last episode (May 10), Don O'Neil said: > Hi all... > > I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I > do this: > > tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) > > It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files > of 0 length, rather than re-established as links. > > What am I doing wrong here, or is my tar broken? Sounds like your tar's broken. (dan@dan.7) /tmp/z> ln -s testing link (dan@dan.7) /tmp/z> md bsdtar gnutar (dan@dan.7) /tmp/z> bsdtar cf - link | ( cd bsdtar && bsdtar xvf - ) x link (dan@dan.7) /tmp/z> gtar cf - link | ( cd gnutar && gtar xvf - ) link (dan@dan.7) /tmp/z> ls -l bsdtar gnutar bsdtar: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 dan wheel 512 May 10 21:19 ./ drwxr-xr-x 4 dan wheel 512 May 10 21:18 ../ lrwxr-xr-x 1 dan wheel 7 May 10 21:18 link@ -> testing gnutar: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 dan wheel 512 May 10 21:19 ./ drwxr-xr-x 4 dan wheel 512 May 10 21:18 ../ lrwxr-xr-x 1 dan wheel 7 May 10 21:19 link@ -> testing (dan@dan.7) /tmp/z> bsdtar --version bsdtar 1.01.020, libarchive 1.02.033 Copyright (C) 2003-2004 Tim Kientzle (dan@dan.7) /tmp/z> gtar --version tar (GNU tar) 1.13.25 -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 02:26:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EA616A405 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B65443D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:26:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4B2QTCc045902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 May 2006 09:26:29 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id k4B2QSd4085927; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:26:28 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:26:28 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200605110226.k4B2QSd4085927@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jay2xra@yahoo.com In-reply-to: <20060511012211.12062.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com> (message from Mark Jayson Alvarez on Wed, 10 May 2006 18:22:11 -0700 (PDT)) References: <20060511012211.12062.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it recommended to allow all outgoing connections from your firewall?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:26:33 -0000 > I've seen most people allow all outgoing traffic > originating from the firewall itself... Is this really > recommended?? What if the machine have been A server being a server (and a firewall is nothing but a specific server) there is no reason one would run a client application from that machine. So I deny every outgoing connection from a server (only exceptions are the protocols used by the server to upgrade itself, http/ftp is allowd only through a proxy). This makes very little constraint and I make the server much safer knowing that one will not be able to read his mail or browse the web from that server. Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 02:27:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A890616A40E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AF143D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:27:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4B2RIDI045945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 May 2006 09:27:18 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id k4B2RItS085960; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:27:18 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:27:18 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200605110227.k4B2RItS085960@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: don@lizardhill.com In-reply-to: <005a01c67498$a54a2a70$0300020a@mickey> (don@lizardhill.com) References: <005a01c67498$a54a2a70$0300020a@mickey> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:27:34 -0000 > I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I do > this: I think that the way to go is: tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfvBp - ) Note the Bp at the end of the extract tar. olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 02:34:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA6C16A406 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ariff@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4928343D48; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:34:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ariff@FreeBSD.org) Received: from misaki (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k4B2Yg0v090742; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:34:42 GMT (envelope-from ariff@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:34:18 +0800 From: Ariff Abdullah To: Lorin Lund Message-Id: <20060511103418.7791006c.ariff@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <44629BFA.3070009@infowest.com> References: <44612BFB.4080705@infowest.com> <44629BFA.3070009@infowest.com> Organization: FreeBSD X-Mailer: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/net/smtp.rb Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__11_May_2006_10_34_18_+0800_WueRQedrhwmIwLyV" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Lock up during install on Compaq Presario notebook with Turion chip - Disabling ACPI doesn't help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:34:43 -0000 --Signature=_Thu__11_May_2006_10_34_18_+0800_WueRQedrhwmIwLyV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 10 May 2006 20:05:46 -0600 Lorin Lund wrote: > Nikolas Britton wrote: >=20 > > On 5/9/06, Lorin Lund wrote: > > > >> I have tried installing 6.0-RELEASE for x64 and 6.1-RELEASE for > >i386. > They both > >> lock up. Below I have transcribed the information showing on the > >screen > when it stops: > >> > >> I'm open to any suggestions/pointers. > >> > >> atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on > >acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > >> kbd0 at atkbd0 > >> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > >> psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 > >> acpi-acad0: on acpi0 > >> battery0: on acpi0 > >> pmtimer0 on isa0 > >> orm0: at iomem > >> 0xc0000-0xcffff,0xd0000-0xd0fff,0xdc000-0xdffff,0xe0000-0xe3fff > >on isa0 > ppc0: parallel port not found. > >> sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > >> sc0: VGA <16 virttual consoles, flags=3D0x300> > >> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > >> sio0: port may not be enabled > >> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > >> sio0: type 8250 or not responding > >> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > >> sio1: port may not be enabled > >> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-ixbffff > >on > isa0 > >> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1794786721 Hz quality 800 > >> Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > >> > >> > > > > Disable ACPI >=20 > tried that. Still locks up at same place. > When I tried verbose it showed 2 more lines after the Timecounters > line: lo0: bpf attached > rr232x: no controller detected >=20 > That was with 6.1-RELEASE i386. When I try it with 6.0-RELEASE x64 > and select 'verbose' the last two lines are: > Linux ELF exec handler installed > lo0: bpf attached >=20 Try to disable serial ports, something like this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-November/103456.h= tml -- Ariff Abdullah FreeBSD --Signature=_Thu__11_May_2006_10_34_18_+0800_WueRQedrhwmIwLyV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYqKzlr+deMUwTNoRAlrWAKDmie3qIJhooYwbHG/VaOdE6H1LOACfX6PQ fEMZB1isms+4o1/xFDmKJck= =8RY7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__11_May_2006_10_34_18_+0800_WueRQedrhwmIwLyV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 02:41:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A2716A436 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:41:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12DB43D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:41:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCA513C7E5; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:43:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BECC13C7E3; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:43:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7881313C404; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:43:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:43:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Pablo Mora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060510212545.B59324@bravo.pjkh.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limit bandwidth 'make fetch' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:41:42 -0000 > how i can limit bandwidth when i using 'make fetch' (make install in Ports)? I wrote a patch to fetch awhile back that does exactly this. That was with 4.x, but it might apply cleanly in 6. I ended up not using it, well cause once I had everything installed it didn't seem to matter so much. http://www.pjkh.com/~philip/fetch/ Basically it adds a "-L" option that takes the b/s to throttle it at... Then tweak um.. FETCH_ARGS or something close to that (man ports for info) to get the ports to pick it up automatically. -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 02:54:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1871616A40D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A28B43D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 02:54:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y25so58606nfb for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:54:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=RyWs/JVU0uVTeuccMWX/lfi9nJ4FuXfHNoYcT5MxTuP7sAcsye6vu08rHjZa33LXTBI6Qimm4lXXunvPmVqamA810Zehyr1PJ7I2tiYPWVba/PI6niZW1xdNrYdIr3N4SjJHTcGoKb1EcMsifwEYQVK7IOF+32lfpc+xupHm2mA= Received: by 10.49.88.7 with SMTP id q7mr27459nfl; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.15.12 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:27:24 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6a7a029e23d45ea2 Subject: tcpdump on 'any' device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:54:30 -0000 Hello, I'm using to running tcpdump like "tcpdump -i any -nn ". But, when I try to use the 'any' device on FreeBSD, I get this. [root@kanga isc-dhcp3-server]# tcpdump -i any -nn tcp port 22 tcpdump: BIOCSETIF: any: Device not configured Can this not be done on FreeBSD? Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 03:22:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E288116A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 03:22:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D27843D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 03:22:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so62127wxc for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:22:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mK3Yjg9CxyXTmatOsfqpJwD8I8bq2VxAp7WhyN3SLzUwZObU8Wth0FCMbVwGaP8DVW3eHQ4qwBUGCy/dNqc4IMhl3EdMUetlb7hQO/U4+TxbxnSDVZyCHyHd1ju5XaFzwx4EmOE+RRm89+ETDEvTD3JS3wBp33a7IAhwpIF2I48= Received: by 10.70.99.17 with SMTP id w17mr493185wxb; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.76.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80f4f2b20605102022m52ad9b27jd27903e7997fa782@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:22:39 -0400 From: "Jim Stapleton" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <80f4f2b20605100617t3adfc57brc213c8571288727f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: securing beyond the handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:22:41 -0000 Rephrase: I have 5 static IPs currently 1 is being used to "power" the NAT for all the machines inside the network, the other 4 are empty. I'm getting one of those 4 remaining, and having it point directly to my BSD machine. On 5/10/06, fbsd wrote: > There is no difference between a dynamic and static ip > address from the point of the firewall. > > If you felt secure before, then getting a static ip > address will have no effect on that. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jim > Stapleton > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:18 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: securing beyond the handbook > > > I'm about to get a static IP and direct outside access for my BSD > box > (before it was hidden behind a firewall/NAT). I was comfortable with > the level of security I've had, but with the whole "open to the > outside world" setup I'll have, what would you suggest for securing > it? > > I'll be running: > Apache > PHP > MySQL > SSH/SFTP > OpenRPG (only occasionally, from a special nonpriv account) > > Any suggestions, any of these that you know are such huge security > holes that you would absolutely demand something else be run? > > Any other security suggestions? > > Thanks, > -Jim > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 03:59:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F053716A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 03:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfalconer@puc.edu) Received: from ecf.puc.edu (ecf2.puc.edu [67.134.132.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8271543D4C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 03:59:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfalconer@puc.edu) Received: from localhost (jfalconer@localhost) by ecf2.puc.edu (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id k4B3lrP18786 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:47:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Jon Falconer To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: virtual not looking up quota for all accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:59:36 -0000 Greetings, I am setting up a new email server using postfix 2.2.10 with LDAP for lookups and courier-imap. I have two accounts setup in LDAP. One is test@puc.edu and the other is test2@ecf3.puc.edu. The logs show that for messages sent to test, there is an LDAP lookup for the maildir quota, but messages sent to test2 there is no LDAP lookup for the maildir quota. Below is my postconf -n output. Message delivery is being done with virtual that has the VDA patches. Is this a bug in the VDA patches or something more fundamental or my config messed up? Thanks for your input, Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- %postconf -n alias_maps = command_directory = /usr/local/sbin config_directory = /usr/local/etc/postfix daemon_directory = /usr/local/libexec/postfix debug_peer_level = 2 default_destination_concurrency_limit = 2 home_mailbox = Maildir/ html_directory = no inet_interfaces = all mail_owner = postfix mail_spool_directory = /var/mail mailq_path = /usr/local/bin/mailq manpage_directory = /usr/local/man message_size_limit = 10000 mydestination = localhost.$mydomain, localhost mydomain = puc.edu mynetworks = 10.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/16, 67.134.132.0/23 myorigin = $mydomain newaliases_path = /usr/local/bin/newaliases queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix readme_directory = no sample_directory = /usr/local/etc/postfix sendmail_path = /usr/local/sbin/sendmail setgid_group = maildrop unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/usr/local/etc/postfix/ldap_virtual_alias virtual_create_maildirsize = yes virtual_gid_maps = static:5000 virtual_mailbox_base = /home/mail virtual_mailbox_domains = puc.edu, ecf3.puc.edu virtual_mailbox_limit = 11000 virtual_mailbox_limit_maps = ldap:/usr/local/etc/postfix/ldap_vquota virtual_mailbox_limit_override = yes virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/usr/local/etc/postfix/ldap_virtual_acct virtual_maildir_extended = yes virtual_minimum_uid = 5000 virtual_uid_maps = static:5000 % From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 04:08:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9282916A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D66143D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:08:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so111746pye for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:08:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qrkv44Z/Pv3nzEn0a2D+TW4xhCiLraBmR6NNxsNYh3Ie0cStdSfwEzuVca7/X7KJ1M2HZ8H7V+mN1bzbWq/RPIgAa9NbkXbsFS2yHp1fdcYuxS4Ye+BaORkNX985l+9zhC9lb29hQkDWaqvgo7BNDdK4iaffE9VxU8v/YQiTqW8= Received: by 10.35.60.15 with SMTP id n15mr512097pyk; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:08:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.43.16 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:08:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:08:00 -0400 From: "Pablo Mora" To: "Philip Hallstrom" In-Reply-To: <20060510212545.B59324@bravo.pjkh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060510212545.B59324@bravo.pjkh.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limit bandwidth 'make fetch' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 04:08:01 -0000 On 5/10/06, Philip Hallstrom wrote: > > how i can limit bandwidth when i using 'make fetch' (make install in Po= rts)? > > I wrote a patch to fetch awhile back that does exactly this. That was > with 4.x, but it might apply cleanly in 6. I ended up not using it, well > cause once I had everything installed it didn't seem to matter so much. > > http://www.pjkh.com/~philip/fetch/ > > Basically it adds a "-L" option that takes the b/s to throttle it at... > > Then tweak um.. FETCH_ARGS or something close to that (man ports for info= ) > to get the ports to pick it up automatically. > > -philip > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Thanks Philip, but exist other way? zean@~: uname -r 5.4-RELEASE --=20 Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft. BSD is for people who love Unix ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 04:09:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BDD16A40D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F3343D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:09:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4B49LoG049234; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:09:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4462B8EB.7070608@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:09:15 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael P. Soulier" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcpdump on 'any' device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 04:09:34 -0000 Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using to running tcpdump like "tcpdump -i any -nn ". > > But, when I try to use the 'any' device on FreeBSD, I get this. > > [root@kanga isc-dhcp3-server]# tcpdump -i any -nn tcp port 22 > tcpdump: BIOCSETIF: any: Device not configured > > Can this not be done on FreeBSD? tcpdump(1) seems to suggest that it's a Linuxism. See also: http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/2002/03/msg00053.html IANAE, but it's quite likely still relevant. KDK -- Why do so many foods come packaged in plastic? It's quite uncanny. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 04:45:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F267F16A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:45:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp108.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 494B643D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:45:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 14116 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 04:45:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pG85/OK36caJ2bZpQU0/P6QM4K97zLNIgU3MIP2tq8hnuBZstwxYcrz4HLkVaYdOtgzrNxwDhV66VWGhJPOsh3wvCXP49x8crENTsPCWhsK20MjSSNp/k/arTms5cGgXFsDnBYF4bpCHisF2FWTe1+tEq76wm89uoYbk612e+3k= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.7.202?) (strbenjr@69.143.43.222 with plain) by smtp108.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 May 2006 04:45:25 -0000 Message-ID: <4462C15D.5090203@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:45:17 -0400 From: Ben Hacker Jr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051005) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions FBSD References: <4460757B.5030107@yahoo.com> <4461D83A.8030902@yahoo.com> <20060510151919.461f329a@apircalabu.dsd.ro> In-Reply-To: <20060510151919.461f329a@apircalabu.dsd.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Adi Pircalabu Subject: Re: Upgrade 5.4 - 6.0 errors. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 04:45:28 -0000 I have posted my complete Kernel config file below. Maybe I need to enable the "CAM infrastructure."?? Adi Pircalabu wrote: >On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:10:34 -0400 Ben Hacker Jr wrote: > > >>linking kernel.debug >>if_ural.o(.text+0x3bb): In function `ural_attach': >>/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:458: undefined reference to >>`ieee80211_ieee2mhz' >>if_ural.o(.text+0x3ef):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:463: undefined >>reference to `ieee80211_ieee2mhz' >> >> >I'm afraid you customized your config file by commenting a mandatory >device / option which is needed for building. Please post your complete >config file. >OTOH, can you build GENERIC? > # # HACK06 -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386 # # For more information on this file, please read the handbook section on # Kernel Configuration Files: # # http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html # # The handbook is also available locally in /usr/share/doc/handbook # if you've installed the doc distribution, otherwise always see the # FreeBSD World Wide Web server (http://www.FreeBSD.org/) for the # latest information. # # An exhaustive list of options and more detailed explanations of the # device lines is also present in the ../../conf/NOTES and NOTES files. # If you are in doubt as to the purpose or necessity of a line, check first # in NOTES. # # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC,v 1.429.2.9 2006/04/30 17:39:42 scottl Exp $ machine i386 #cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU ident HACK06 # To statically compile in device wiring instead of /boot/device.hints #hints "GENERIC.hints" # Default places to look for devices. makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols #options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption options INET # InterNETworking #options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~128k to driver. options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~215k to driver. options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive. options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel device apic # I/O APIC # Bus support. device eisa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc ## ATA and ATAPI devices #device ata #device atadisk # ATA disk drives #device ataraid # ATA RAID drives #device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives #device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives #options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering # SCSI Controllers #device ahb # EISA AHA1742 family device ahc # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices #device ahd # AHA39320/29320 and onboard AIC79xx devices #device amd # AMD 53C974 (Tekram DC-390(T)) #device isp # Qlogic family ##device ispfw # Firmware for QLogic HBAs- normally a module #device mpt # LSI-Logic MPT-Fusion ##device ncr # NCR/Symbios Logic #device sym # NCR/Symbios Logic (newer chipsets + those of `ncr') #device trm # Tekram DC395U/UW/F DC315U adapters #device adv # Advansys SCSI adapters #device adw # Advansys wide SCSI adapters #device aha # Adaptec 154x SCSI adapters device aic # Adaptec 15[012]x SCSI adapters, AIC-6[23]60. #device bt # Buslogic/Mylex MultiMaster SCSI adapters #device ncv # NCR 53C500 #device nsp # Workbit Ninja SCSI-3 #device stg # TMC 18C30/18C50 # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) device ch # SCSI media changers device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) # RAID controllers interfaced to the SCSI subsystem #device amr # AMI MegaRAID #device arcmsr # Areca SATA II RAID #device asr # DPT SmartRAID V, VI and Adaptec SCSI RAID #device ciss # Compaq Smart RAID 5* #device dpt # DPT Smartcache III, IV - See NOTES for options #device hptmv # Highpoint RocketRAID 182x #device rr232x # Highpoint RocketRAID 232x #device iir # Intel Integrated RAID #device ips # IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID #device mly # Mylex AcceleRAID/eXtremeRAID #device twa # 3ware 9000 series PATA/SATA RAID # RAID controllers device aac # Adaptec FSA RAID device aacp # SCSI passthrough for aac (requires CAM) #device ida # Compaq Smart RAID #device mfi # LSI MegaRAID SAS #device mlx # Mylex DAC960 family #device pst # Promise Supertrak SX6000 #device twe # 3ware ATA RAID # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device kbdmux # keyboard multiplexer device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc # Enable this for the pcvt (VT220 compatible) console driver #device vt #options XSERVER # support for X server on a vt console #options FAT_CURSOR # start with block cursor device agp # support several AGP chipsets # Power management support (see NOTES for more options) #device apm # Add suspend/resume support for the i8254. device pmtimer ## PCCARD (PCMCIA) support ## PCMCIA and cardbus bridge support #device cbb # cardbus (yenta) bridge #device pccard # PC Card (16-bit) bus #device cardbus # CardBus (32-bit) bus # Serial (COM) ports device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports # Parallel port device ppc device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device plip # TCP/IP over parallel device ppi # Parallel port interface device #device vpo # Requires scbus and da # If you've got a "dumb" serial or parallel PCI card that is # supported by the puc(4) glue driver, uncomment the following # line to enable it (connects to the sio and/or ppc drivers): #device puc ## PCI Ethernet NICs. #device de # DEC/Intel DC21x4x (``Tulip'') #device em # Intel PRO/1000 adapter Gigabit Ethernet Card #device ixgb # Intel PRO/10GbE Ethernet Card #device txp # 3Com 3cR990 (``Typhoon'') #device vx # 3Com 3c590, 3c595 (``Vortex'') # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! device miibus # MII bus support #device bce # Broadcom BCM5706/BCM5708 Gigabit Ethernet #device bfe # Broadcom BCM440x 10/100 Ethernet #device bge # Broadcom BCM570xx Gigabit Ethernet #device dc # DEC/Intel 21143 and various workalikes device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) #device lge # Level 1 LXT1001 gigabit Ethernet #device nge # NatSemi DP83820 gigabit Ethernet #device nve # nVidia nForce MCP on-board Ethernet Networking #device pcn # AMD Am79C97x PCI 10/100(precedence over 'lnc') #device re # RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S #device rl # RealTek 8129/8139 #device sf # Adaptec AIC-6915 (``Starfire'') #device sis # Silicon Integrated Systems SiS 900/SiS 7016 #device sk # SysKonnect SK-984x & SK-982x gigabit Ethernet #device ste # Sundance ST201 (D-Link DFE-550TX) #device ti # Alteon Networks Tigon I/II gigabit Ethernet #device tl # Texas Instruments ThunderLAN #device tx # SMC EtherPower II (83c170 ``EPIC'') #device vge # VIA VT612x gigabit Ethernet #device vr # VIA Rhine, Rhine II #device wb # Winbond W89C840F #device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') ## ISA Ethernet NICs. pccard NICs included. #device cs # Crystal Semiconductor CS89x0 NIC ## 'device ed' requires 'device miibus' #device ed # NE[12]000, SMC Ultra, 3c503, DS8390 cards #device ex # Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 and Pro/10+ #device ep # Etherlink III based cards #device fe # Fujitsu MB8696x based cards #device ie # EtherExpress 8/16, 3C507, StarLAN 10 etc. #device lnc # NE2100, NE32-VL Lance Ethernet cards #device sn # SMC's 9000 series of Ethernet chips #device xe # Xircom pccard Ethernet ## Wireless NIC cards #device wlan # 802.11 support #device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. #device awi # BayStack 660 and others #device ral # Ralink Technology RT2500 wireless NICs. #device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. ##device wl # Older non 802.11 Wavelan wireless NIC. # Pseudo devices. device loop # Network loopback device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support device sl # Kernel SLIP device ppp # Kernel PPP device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) device md # Memory "disks" device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. device bpf # Berkeley packet filter # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface #device ehci # EHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 2.0) device usb # USB Bus (required) #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices device ugen # Generic #device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse device ural # Ralink Technology RT2500USB wireless NICs device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player device uscanner # Scanners ## USB Ethernet, requires miibus #device aue # ADMtek USB Ethernet #device axe # ASIX Electronics USB Ethernet #device cdce # Generic USB over Ethernet #device cue # CATC USB Ethernet #device kue # Kawasaki LSI USB Ethernet #device rue # RealTek RTL8150 USB Ethernet # FireWire support device firewire # FireWire bus code device sbp # SCSI over FireWire (Requires scbus and da) device fwe # Ethernet over FireWire (non-standard!) -- Ben Hacker, Jr. Network Security Analyst strbenjr {at} yahoo.com -- -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 04:58:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83E216A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:58:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F62D43D49 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:58:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=DESKTOP) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1Fe3GE-0003Yu-Qe for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:58:51 +0100 Message-ID: <002f01c674b7$78a7fc30$0807a8c0@DESKTOP> From: "Graham Bentley" To: References: <20060511040812.C729316A41A@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 05:57:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 Subject: SCSI Tape Log Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 04:58:53 -0000 Although my backup appears to work fine I get this in the security log ... +(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 16384-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer +(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): PREVENT ALLOW MEDIUM REMOVAL. CDB: 1e 0 0 0 0 0 +(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error +(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition +(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:28,0 +(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed +(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): Unretryable error I will try another tape today. Any suggestions as to what could be causing this ? Thanks ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 05:43:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF89A16A405 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35A043D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:43:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so129182pye for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:43:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZhkIbbMDEIPphAQyyPWxR8VwUKHlr3Tny11IEdI5yujScVlEILeCcCj9tyNeq+jh075oHVCi5GjodU/EtaM2nGaXXWYgHU0WSriC2rV58SSwt9Cafn2R6XKgyvDoLYFLFlj2l5ym5oMscfXG3LjLsQYISzKZxE1vFD35H3u2vBQ= Received: by 10.35.91.15 with SMTP id t15mr616205pyl; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.13.3 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:43:42 -0400 From: "David Stanford" To: "Jim Stapleton" In-Reply-To: <80f4f2b20605102022m52ad9b27jd27903e7997fa782@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <80f4f2b20605100617t3adfc57brc213c8571288727f@mail.gmail.com> <80f4f2b20605102022m52ad9b27jd27903e7997fa782@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: securing beyond the handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 05:43:43 -0000 Jim, I'm currently reading Mastering FreeBSD and OpenBSD Security, and thus far it is proving to be a fantastic book covering many advanced security topics specifically related to BSD. I suggested you order a copy from Amazon; it's well worth the time... -David On 5/10/06, Jim Stapleton wrote: > > Rephrase: > > I have 5 static IPs > currently 1 is being used to "power" the NAT for all the machines > inside the network, the other 4 are empty. > > I'm getting one of those 4 remaining, and having it point directly to > my BSD machine. > > > > On 5/10/06, fbsd wrote: > > There is no difference between a dynamic and static ip > > address from the point of the firewall. > > > > If you felt secure before, then getting a static ip > > address will have no effect on that. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jim > > Stapleton > > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:18 AM > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: securing beyond the handbook > > > > > > I'm about to get a static IP and direct outside access for my BSD > > box > > (before it was hidden behind a firewall/NAT). I was comfortable with > > the level of security I've had, but with the whole "open to the > > outside world" setup I'll have, what would you suggest for securing > > it? > > > > I'll be running: > > Apache > > PHP > > MySQL > > SSH/SFTP > > OpenRPG (only occasionally, from a special nonpriv account) > > > > Any suggestions, any of these that you know are such huge security > > holes that you would absolutely demand something else be run? > > > > Any other security suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > -Jim > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 05:57:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8255816A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakbeatz@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CC643D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:57:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jakbeatz@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so99640nzf for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:57:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Xc2AcC6lkyKWM3FJlYuUAWseZgj7eQfeb73BnflxNW0qLG7Y8/z8OHDiQe92ZeUlLQQai6O/e8GbpYYu2Vc0SUAKMy2YKVTmvNscbDzF05u9qWtMw1QU/qPW3AuJZTVUC9GNwssOW73Ghn1ni1FeOhJvKUo3ZdLQuDy/zNAiTNA= Received: by 10.64.131.17 with SMTP id e17mr248791qbd; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.35.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4993f7e10605102257r5740c3b9p267a511ef055c238@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:57:23 -0400 From: Questions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: I2O vs. Mass Storage Modes on Dell Perc Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 05:57:24 -0000 I just installed 6.1 on a Dell PowerEdge 1850 and the RAID adapter was initially set for Mass Storage mode. I read that I2O mode is a better mode, so I flipped it to I2O, and the machine booted fine. For some reason this confuses me. I would assume that my changing the emulation of the RAID Adapter would cause the machine to no longer boot. Am I wrong in this assumption and switching between emulation modes should not affect booting? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 06:32:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CB316A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net (pih-relay06.plus.net [212.159.14.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E184743D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:32:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=DESKTOP) by pih-relay06.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1Fe4j6-0006PA-BV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:32:44 +0100 Message-ID: <000501c674c4$968c7fc0$0807a8c0@DESKTOP> From: "Graham Bentley" To: References: <20060511040812.C729316A41A@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:31:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 Subject: ACPI / APM Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 06:32:46 -0000 I am running 6.0 on a little rackserver. Alot of the time its inactive and I was wondering about trying to setup ACPI the main reason being to spin down the disc / PSU so its a bit quieter (its in my office) I would require it to wake on LAN activity. How feasable is this and what steps do I need to take to set it up ? I am reading acpiconf man right now but I suspect more is required. I have set the BIOS to WOL, spin down disc after 15 mins and ACPI suspend type to S1. Just tested acpiconf -s 4 and it shuts the system down completely? Any help appreciated - Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 06:37:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B5016A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:37:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick@nickwithers.com) Received: from mail.nickwithers.com (mail.manrags.com [203.219.206.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4CF43D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:37:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nick@nickwithers.com) Received: from nickwithers.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nickwithers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E523A146; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:36:54 +1000 (EST) Received: from 150.203.2.85 (SquirrelMail authenticated user nick) by nickwithers.com with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:36:55 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <59218.150.203.2.85.1147329415.squirrel@nickwithers.com> In-Reply-To: <4462C15D.5090203@yahoo.com> References: <4460757B.5030107@yahoo.com> <4461D83A.8030902@yahoo.com> <20060510151919.461f329a@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <4462C15D.5090203@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:36:55 +1000 (EST) From: "Nick Withers" To: "Ben Hacker Jr" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-nickwithers-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-nickwithers-MailScanner-From: nick@nickwithers.com Cc: Adi Pircalabu , questions FBSD Subject: Re: Upgrade 5.4 - 6.0 errors. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 06:37:09 -0000 G'day Ben! On Thu, 11 May, 2006 2:45 pm, Ben Hacker Jr wrote: > I have posted my complete Kernel config file below. I _believe_ you need include the wlan device. > Maybe I need to enable the "CAM infrastructure."?? > > Adi Pircalabu wrote: > >>On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:10:34 -0400 Ben Hacker Jr wrote: >> >> >>>linking kernel.debug >>>if_ural.o(.text+0x3bb): In function `ural_attach': >>>/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:458: undefined reference to >>>`ieee80211_ieee2mhz' >>>if_ural.o(.text+0x3ef):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:463: undefined >>>reference to `ieee80211_ieee2mhz' >>> >>> >>I'm afraid you customized your config file by commenting a mandatory >>device / option which is needed for building. Please post your complete >>config file. >>OTOH, can you build GENERIC? >> > # > # HACK06 -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386 > # (snip) > ## Wireless NIC cards > #device wlan # 802.11 support > #device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. > #device awi # BayStack 660 and others > #device ral # Ralink Technology RT2500 wireless NICs. > #device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. > ##device wl # Older non 802.11 Wavelan wireless NIC. > > # Pseudo devices. > device loop # Network loopback > device random # Entropy device > device ether # Ethernet support > device sl # Kernel SLIP > device ppp # Kernel PPP > device tun # Packet tunnel. > device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) > device md # Memory "disks" > device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling > device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) > > # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. > # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! > # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. > device bpf # Berkeley packet filter > > # USB support > device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface > device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface > #device ehci # EHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 2.0) > device usb # USB Bus (required) > #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices > device ugen # Generic > #device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" > device ukbd # Keyboard > device ulpt # Printer > device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da > device ums # Mouse > device ural # Ralink Technology RT2500USB wireless NICs > device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player > device uscanner # Scanners > ## USB Ethernet, requires miibus > #device aue # ADMtek USB Ethernet > #device axe # ASIX Electronics USB Ethernet > #device cdce # Generic USB over Ethernet > #device cue # CATC USB Ethernet > #device kue # Kawasaki LSI USB Ethernet > #device rue # RealTek RTL8150 USB Ethernet > > # FireWire support > device firewire # FireWire bus code > device sbp # SCSI over FireWire (Requires scbus and da) > device fwe # Ethernet over FireWire (non-standard!) > > -- > Ben Hacker, Jr. > Network Security Analyst > strbenjr {at} yahoo.com > -- -- -- -- Nick Withers email: nick@nickwithers.com Web: http://www.nickwithers.com Mobile: +61 414 397 446 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 06:52:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7781E16A408 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2047B43D49 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=DESKTOP) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1Fe522-0000Bt-Mn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:52:18 +0100 Message-ID: <000901c674c7$52832c40$0807a8c0@DESKTOP> From: "Graham Bentley" To: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:51:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 Subject: Re: ACPI / APM Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 06:52:20 -0000 Here is output :- rackserver# sysctl hw.acpi hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state: S1 S4 S5 hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 hw.acpi.sleep_button_state: S1 hw.acpi.lid_switch_state: NONE hw.acpi.standby_state: S1 hw.acpi.suspend_state: S3 hw.acpi.sleep_delay: 1 hw.acpi.s4bios: 0 hw.acpi.verbose: 0 hw.acpi.reset_video: 1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 C2/90 C3/900 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% hw.acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 10 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 32.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.thermal_flags: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 50.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._HOT: -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 60.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: 50.0C -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 > I am running 6.0 on a little rackserver. > Alot of the time its inactive and I was > wondering about trying to setup ACPI > the main reason being to spin down the > disc / PSU so its a bit quieter (its in my > office) I would require it to wake on > LAN activity. How feasable is this > and what steps do I need to take > to set it up ? > > I am reading acpiconf man right now > but I suspect more is required. > > I have set the BIOS to WOL, spin > down disc after 15 mins and ACPI > suspend type to S1. > > Just tested acpiconf -s 4 and it > shuts the system down completely? > > Any help appreciated - Thanks! > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 06:53:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EE416A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:53:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA09343D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:53:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BE513C7E5; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:55:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 28D1F13C7E3; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:55:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F5A13C404; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:55:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:55:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Pablo Mora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060511015100.U89265@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <20060510212545.B59324@bravo.pjkh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limit bandwidth 'make fetch' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 06:53:10 -0000 > On 5/10/06, Philip Hallstrom wrote: >> > how i can limit bandwidth when i using 'make fetch' (make install in >> Ports)? >> >> I wrote a patch to fetch awhile back that does exactly this. That was >> with 4.x, but it might apply cleanly in 6. I ended up not using it, well >> cause once I had everything installed it didn't seem to matter so much. >> >> http://www.pjkh.com/~philip/fetch/ >> >> Basically it adds a "-L" option that takes the b/s to throttle it at... >> >> Then tweak um.. FETCH_ARGS or something close to that (man ports for info) >> to get the ports to pick it up automatically. >> >> -philip >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Thanks Philip, but exist other way? > > zean@~: uname -r > 5.4-RELEASE Seems to work on my 5.4 box... % uname -r 5.4-RELEASE % cd /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch % patch < fetch.1.diff Hmm... Looks like a new-style context diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |*** fetch.1-orig Wed Mar 5 16:43:34 2003 |--- fetch.1 Wed Mar 5 16:45:04 2003 -------------------------- Patching file fetch.1 using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 110 (offset 3 lines). done % patch < fetch.c.diff Hmm... Looks like a new-style context diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |*** fetch.c.orig Tue May 24 15:07:34 2005 |--- fetch.c Tue May 24 15:07:21 2005 -------------------------- Patching file fetch.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 82 (offset 1 line). Hunk #2 succeeded at 320 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 595 (offset 11 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 710 (offset 8 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 731 (offset 11 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 772 (offset 8 lines). done % make Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch cc -O -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c fetch.c cc -O -pipe -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -o fetch fetch.o -lfetch -lssl -lcrypto gzip -cn fetch.1 > fetch.1.gz % % ./fetch -v usage: fetch [-146AFMPRUadlmnpqrsv] [-N netrc] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] [-B bytes] [-T seconds] [-w seconds] [-L bytes/sec] [-h host -f file [-c dir] | URL ...] just follow that up with a make install and you should be okay. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 06:55:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E394216A404 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705C543D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:55:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1Fe55G-0007u3-A3; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:55:38 -0600 In-Reply-To: <4993f7e10605102257r5740c3b9p267a511ef055c238@mail.gmail.com> References: <4993f7e10605102257r5740c3b9p267a511ef055c238@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <838748D8-6425-415F-918B-04429636C970@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:55:37 -0600 To: Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I2O vs. Mass Storage Modes on Dell Perc Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 06:55:40 -0000 On May 10, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Questions wrote: > I just installed 6.1 on a Dell PowerEdge 1850 and the RAID adapter was > initially set for Mass Storage mode. I read that I2O mode is a better > mode, so I flipped it to I2O, and the machine booted fine. For some > reason this confuses me. I would assume that my changing the > emulation of the RAID Adapter would cause the machine to no longer > boot. Am I wrong in this assumption and switching between emulation > modes should not affect booting? Disclaimer: I probably don't know what I am talking about and am not familiar with the various modes of the Dell RAID controller etc. Why would you expect it to affect booting? I suspect that the machines BIOS makes the RAID available no matter what the mode and that the boot happens on the "bios" disk (through a "bios" interface). Again, this is not my area of knowledge but that is what I am guessing. Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 07:16:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D227B16A42B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lalev@sv-bg.com) Received: from mail.sv-bg.com (www.sv-bg.com [213.222.60.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B4B843D5C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:16:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lalev@sv-bg.com) Received: (qmail 5913 invoked by uid 1010); 11 May 2006 10:22:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (lalev@sv-bg.com@213.222.60.195) by mail.sv-bg.com with SMTP; 11 May 2006 10:22:28 -0000 Message-ID: <4462E4B5.8030105@sv-bg.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:16:05 +0300 From: Angelin Lalev User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Intelligent way of dealing with dependancies in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:16:20 -0000 I'm rather tired of having to update firefox port due security fixes and then having to build the new versions of glib, expat, and so on an so on, every one of which complains that tere are older versions of the lib installed. I've tried pkg_delete -f and install of the newer version, but then all the binaries in the system started complaining because they don't find the exact version of the shared library they are compiled with. What's the intelligent way of dealing with the problem? (Prefferably the one which does not include downloading 600+ MB of source every time :-( ) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 07:22:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B1316A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D55543D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:22:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4B7MAx70647; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:22:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Axel S. Gruner" , Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:22:10 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1147254334.715.9.camel@sn001.suedfac.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:22:32 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Axel S. Gruner >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:46 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo > > >Am Mittwoch, den 10.05.2006, 02:05 -0700 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: >> My guess is it will be a long, long time before you see CDROMs >> from anybody that have deleted Beastie and have the sex toy. > >At LinuxTag 2006 in Wiesbaden we had prepared a lot of CDs with the new >Logo (what you call a "sex toy"?). We also used the new logo as a flag >on our booth. >You will find a few pictures here: >http://www.encephalon.de/photo/bsd_bilder/lt2006/index.html > >So, the "long long time" was a really short time ;-). > I think you missed the part of the post where I said: "people have to pay for, to see if those last as a product," The context of the post made it pretty clear I was talking about commercial CD's that are sold, not given away. But I suppose that interpreting context is too advanced a task to ask of some people. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 07:26:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7649916A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from wotsit2.thingy.com (wotsit.thingy.com [212.21.100.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B302843D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:26:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 41816 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2006 07:26:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.16?) (212.46.145.34) by wotsit2.thingy.com with SMTP; 11 May 2006 07:26:57 -0000 Message-ID: <4462E73E.1000306@thingy.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:26:54 +0100 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pablo Mora References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] limit bandwidth 'make fetch' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:26:59 -0000 Pablo Mora wrote: > how i can limit bandwidth when i using 'make fetch' (make install in > Ports)? You can change the command-line parameters for fetch in the /usr/ports/Mk/ somewhere (grep for FETCH). Or you could try the 'trickle' port, which allows you to apply bandwidth limits to more or less any command line application whether they support it or not. You use it like you would use time(1), as a prefix on the real command line. Best Regards, Howie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 07:32:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9653016A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB98B43D58 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:32:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so73817wra for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:32:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FRiQTHvzE+7mig/dPZB18o0aKKigIJIhhV2Mme4OHVV+K0WJsF1Mmj02E3fiLw+CkbB4v6V+UIyaVWL9iO8wTKFzTzcQA+maxT5KMYG0MmCcx/xOHuopnP3tkZifgCEUmyncJW04G6KOmd4b4F3YuGar6N60LZ3OnrfloX+ZatQ= Received: by 10.54.93.4 with SMTP id q4mr588371wrb; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.23? ( [201.246.178.103]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 6sm4502010wrl.2006.05.11.00.32.13; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4462E872.3080904@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:32:02 -0400 From: Pablo Mora Hinojosa User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060511) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Howard Jones References: <4462E73E.1000306@thingy.com> In-Reply-To: <4462E73E.1000306@thingy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] limit bandwidth 'make fetch' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:32:15 -0000 Howard Jones wrote: > Pablo Mora wrote: >> how i can limit bandwidth when i using 'make fetch' (make install in >> Ports)? > You can change the command-line parameters for fetch in the > /usr/ports/Mk/ somewhere (grep for FETCH). > > Or you could try the 'trickle' port, which allows you to apply bandwidth > limits to more or less any command line application whether they support > it or not. You use it like you would use time(1), as a prefix on the > real command line. > > > Best Regards, > > Howie > Very thanks!! I will test this From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 07:38:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BC816A406 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769B243D49 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:38:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4B7cRx70727; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:38:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "DAve" , Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:38:27 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <4461F57D.502@pixelhammer.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:38:31 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of DAve >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:15 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > > >To be blunt about it, you and everyone else had their chance. >My wife, a >designer, knew FreeBSD had a logo contest and she wouldn't know FreeBSD >from a martian if it were not for my T-shirt. > >Anyone could have contributed. But like beta testing, most simply >ignored the request to participate, preferring to wait until someone >else did the hard work and made the tough decisions, then chose >to bitch >when the result was not want they wanted. It's apathy. Yea, I'm more >than annoyed and this has been a long time coming. > Dave, This isn't true, there were a lot of submissions for the logo contest. >How many people actually keep a development server running just to help >open source developers test patches or updates, even when those patches >and updates do not affect them? > I do, and I used it to produce a patch to the bge driver a few weeks ago to stop panics on the HP DL320 G4. The patch was submitted to the PR database per instructions. And guess what - that patch hasn't been applied. Not only that, but the developer assigned to the driver hasn't even posted a reason why he DOESEN'T want to apply it. If you want to get pissed off about apathy, please get pissed off about stuff like that. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 07:44:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D9B16A403 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:44:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFC843D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:44:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4B7i0x70743; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:44:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Greg Barniskis" , Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:44:00 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <446200A8.9020901@scls.lib.wi.us> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:44:37 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Greg Barniskis >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:03 AM >To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > >The logo issue is a horse that has been solidly beaten to death, >raised as a zombie, chased with torches and pitchforks, burnt to >crispiness, buried and then (surprise!) brought to life again this >week for another 1,001 rounds of beating and flaming. Tiresome, really. > >No one is belittling the subject, only pointing out that it's both >OT and done with. The appearance of the logo on the Web site is not >a beginning, it's a finality. If you want to hack and burn the >undead, go play Oblivion. ;) > Greg, Doesen't it occur to you that the fact that this horse keeps getting resurrected indicates the new logo was a bad idea and needs to go away? When Beastie was the logo, we didn't see arguments over the logo erupt every 6 months or so in the questions mailing list. The mark of a fool is that he cannot learn from his mistakes. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 07:52:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DFA16A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7666A43D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:52:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4B7q1x70778; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:52:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Ceri Davies" , "Jonathan Horne" , Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:52:01 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:52:29 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Ceri Davies [mailto:ceri@submonkey.net] >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:31 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Jonathan Horne; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > >On 10/5/06 09:18, "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: > >> >> Someone already posted a professional analysis. The summary was that >> the new logo was amateurish with some serious flaws. >Amateurish because >> a ball is about the easiest thing you can produce in >Photoshop and very >> unoriginal. Serious flaws because due to all the shading this logo is >> impossible to accurately reproduce on small items like business cards, >> and on larger items the shading makes it very expensive to >reproduce due >> to the number of colors used. > >In fact, there are reduced colour versions for exactly that >reason. Since >you didn't bother to look for them, I guess this isn't the real >issue for >you, though. > I was merely relating what the summary was. But, I think you fail to understand the point - the summary said that the shading is impossible to reproduce accurately on small items, a reduced color image simply is an official statement of "yeah, we know it's flawed in that it cannot be accurately reduced, so here's a substitute" It is like you got a car that is leaking oil at a rate of a quart a week and someone's "fix" for it is to give you a coupon for 4 free cases of oil. I guess that's technically a "fix", hope your rod bearings stand up to it, though. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 07:53:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598B716A411 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:53:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mo.babaei@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1E443D8A for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:53:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mo.babaei@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so152488pye for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:53:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=R/zw+OliXbl2GqnHL/BZZa2gZ5eN8l8u4SQDO7kKRCrqk6Ifyb7gMhfgQUROB2urxzacGF0p0MFLYzMGzfvOaDMTKyr+5KjFsZ+ZXTdWyLUT8MaYIwJP8NVdAR3fRhYA6DFdEYfJbfvRitVDz7u3wvHKmAPBDZ3DTuIusEmDf7U= Received: by 10.35.12.13 with SMTP id p13mr734394pyi; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.26.20 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5bf3a41f0605110053u38db8543ifd2f6a11a555e24d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:23:25 +0430 From: "Mohamad Babaei" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mysql FreeBSD 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:53:36 -0000 Hi, Has anyone installed Mysql 4.x or 5.x on FreeBSD 6.x in a production environment? Is the problem with FreeBSD threading is still exist? (in Freebsd 4.x i used "Linux threads" in production and it works fine.) Regards, Mo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 08:10:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E13116A403 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:10:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from palstra.com (palstra.com [82.201.5.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAACB43D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:10:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from riemer by palstra.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fe6G3-000M34-SN; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:10:51 +0200 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:10:51 +0200 From: Riemer Palstra To: Mohamad Babaei Message-ID: <20060511081051.GA70884@rb1.palstra.com> References: <5bf3a41f0605110053u38db8543ifd2f6a11a555e24d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5bf3a41f0605110053u38db8543ifd2f6a11a555e24d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysql FreeBSD 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:10:53 -0000 On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 12:23:25PM +0430, Mohamad Babaei wrote: > Has anyone installed Mysql 4.x or 5.x on FreeBSD 6.x in a production > environment? Quite a few I think. > Is the problem with FreeBSD threading is still exist? See these Wiki pages: http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/MySQL Switching to libthr has given quite excellent performance on FreeBSD 6.0 with MySQL 5.0.x for me... -- Riemer Palstra Amsterdam, The Netherlands riemer@palstra.com http://www.palstra.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 08:11:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8D316A405 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D4143D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:11:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4B8AQx70862; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:10:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Greg Barniskis" , "cpghost" Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:10:25 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <44622BDF.3090703@scls.lib.wi.us> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Importance: Normal Cc: fbsd@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:11:13 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Greg Barniskis >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 11:07 AM >To: cpghost >Cc: fbsd@a1poweruser.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > >These are indeed all perfectly valid questions. What I was trying to >express is that the askers really don't seem to be accepting (or >even seeing) the perfectly valid answers: > >* See the archives where this was beaten to death multiple times. >* The best place to pursue such matters is in those forums chartered >for PR and general chatter. >* Read announce@. > >To those taking affront at such answers, no one is saying "oh, fork >you!" in some intentionally rude or belittling way (at least, I'm >not), they're saying forking (process-wise) to the appropriate forum >is the logical thing to do. > I take affront to such answers because of the simple fact that it's obvious that your perfectly valid answer isn't a real answer. A real answer would be something that would get rid of this continual resurgence of this discussion. Based on responses I'd estimate about 60% of FBSD users didn't want the logo changed before the contest. Based on responses post-contest results, I think about 90% of users hate the new logo. Now, the folks that didn't want the logo changed, well you can assume most of them aren't going to like the new logo. But it's pretty clear that quite a large number of the "lets change the logo" proponents don't like what they got. Thus, the alleged "problem" of Beastie being used as the logo, wasn't solved. No amount of referring people to other lists is going to satify anyone - because it's still a problem. When FreeBSD changed to CAM and broke support for the Adaptec 1520 SCSI card, tons of people complained on this forum, and many other in-appropriate forums. This continued despite repeated statements from the developers in charge of such things that the Adaptec 1520 chipset is terrible, find another one, etc. etc. Finally someone wrote the driver and the complaints went away - because the real answer had happened. If core simply cannot tolerate Beastie as the logo, so they simply have to have something else, then the only real answer is to ditch the sex toy and draw another "new" logo to replace it. Hell, commercial companies do this all the time. That would be the logical response. But, core won't do it because egos are involved here, and to do this would be an open admission that they fucked up. Seems to be that the core developers have no problem admitting when they have fucked up some technical decision about how FreeBSD is structured internally. But, when it comes to something like a poor result of a silly contest, they are unable to grok that. Very very strange. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 08:16:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA2B16A406 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C509243D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:16:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so78680wra for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:16:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=HuCaYF4j62imubIrF+7xe/GGbWAGMXYg+GEhSosAtgvddYYno7wpa3VOHjn0SXzhsWa4EUCuWRIDqUQ8TW954SwVa+ujkjNKwOUmJ5ZJeekWGOzyPpcH0F2kbHC8gFE4PaVxUuu7a1+z4cZzH+8Jew4GzMu59WQKNvyAIMO34ZA= Received: by 10.54.80.18 with SMTP id d18mr695362wrb; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.117.10 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 01:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:16:30 +0300 From: "Perttu Laine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:16:31 -0000 Just wondering if someone knows when 5.5-RELEASE will be out? --=20 kpn @ IRCnet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 08:27:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB73F16A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF8443D4C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:27:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1Fe6Vj-0001aN-Qh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:27:03 +0400 Received: from igorr by sysadm.stc with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Fe6VH-0008vn-9v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:26:35 +0400 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:26:34 +0400 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511082634.GJ9026@sysadm.stc> References: <4460B4EC.9080808@medienhaus.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4460B4EC.9080808@medienhaus.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Igor Robul X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: something like devil-linux with freebsd possible ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:27:07 -0000 On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:27:40PM +0200, Florian Meister wrote: > I think it's a very nice project, but I am searching for the same in > *BSD. Is there such a project around ? Look at FreeSBIE. This is "live CD SDK". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 08:38:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139D716A405 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from pinnacle.akherb.com (60-105-237-24.gci.net [24.237.105.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAF743D46 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:38:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 07EE95D62; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:38:46 -0800 (AKDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pinnacle.akherb.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 Received: from [192.168.241.106] (7-137-58-66.gci.net [66.58.137.7]) by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121105CA6 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:38:44 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:38:39 -0800 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart10083874.UnVQ7k5uk8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605110038.41282.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:38:47 -0000 --nextPart10083874.UnVQ7k5uk8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 11 May 2006 00:10, you wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Greg Barniskis > >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 11:07 AM > >To: cpghost > >Cc: fbsd@a1poweruser.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > > > > >These are indeed all perfectly valid questions. What I was trying to > >express is that the askers really don't seem to be accepting (or > >even seeing) the perfectly valid answers: > > > >* See the archives where this was beaten to death multiple times. > >* The best place to pursue such matters is in those forums chartered > >for PR and general chatter. > >* Read announce@. > > > >To those taking affront at such answers, no one is saying "oh, fork > >you!" in some intentionally rude or belittling way (at least, I'm > >not), they're saying forking (process-wise) to the appropriate forum > >is the logical thing to do. > > I take affront to such answers because of the simple fact that it's > obvious that your perfectly valid answer isn't a real answer. A real > answer would be something that would get rid of this continual > resurgence of this discussion. > > Based on responses I'd estimate about 60% of FBSD users didn't want > the logo changed before the contest. > > Based on responses post-contest results, I think about 90% of users hate > the new logo. Now, the folks that didn't want the logo changed, well you > can assume most > of them aren't going to like the new logo. But it's pretty clear that > quite a large number of the "lets change the logo" proponents don't > like what they got. > > Thus, the alleged "problem" of Beastie being used as the logo, wasn't > solved. No amount of referring people to other lists is going to > satify anyone - because it's still a problem. > > When FreeBSD changed to CAM and broke support for the Adaptec 1520 > SCSI card, tons of people complained on this forum, and many other > in-appropriate forums. This continued despite repeated statements from > the developers in charge of such things that the Adaptec 1520 chipset > is terrible, find another one, etc. etc. Finally someone wrote the > driver and the complaints went away - because the real answer had > happened. > > If core simply cannot tolerate Beastie as the logo, so they simply > have to have something else, then the only real answer is to ditch the > sex toy and draw another "new" logo to replace it. Hell, commercial > companies do this all the time. > > That would be the logical response. But, core won't do it because > egos are involved here, and to do this would be an open admission > that they fucked up. > > Seems to be that the core developers have no problem admitting when > they have fucked up some technical decision about how FreeBSD is > structured internally. But, when it comes to something like a poor > result of a silly contest, they are unable to grok that. Very very > strange. > > Ted You were right about the printing. I had to get something from the printer= =20 this afternoon, so I printed out a copy of the new logo and took it with me. I ask them how much for 1K CD case inserts. They said it would have to be d= one=20 4 color and they would be .30 - .40 ea with setup. And that's not even=20 including the CD labels themselves. I've had full color brochures printed f= or=20 not much more than that. I didn't even bother asking about server stickers. Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart10083874.UnVQ7k5uk8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEYvgRp5D0B1NlT4URAtD3AJ46U2Bmq1NuYj9fY+BgxAByCxGq1QCeOLfM 6J8F5vHnWR0qaZsymC+6mrg= =LWEZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart10083874.UnVQ7k5uk8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 08:47:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FC316A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kouji@cty-net.ne.jp) Received: from radius.cynet.co.jp (radius.cynet.co.jp [210.130.249.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6936643D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:47:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kouji@cty-net.ne.jp) Received: (qmail 1200 invoked by uid 902); 11 May 2006 17:47:12 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO ?61.197.127.219?) (61.197.127.219) by radius.cynet.co.jp with SMTP; 11 May 2006 17:47:12 +0900 Message-ID: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:47:07 +0900 From: Kouji Ito User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051008) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:47:16 -0000 Hello, I wait very much,too, but it is not readily released. If there is a detailed person for circumstances in 5.5-RELEASE situation, please teach it. Perttu Laine wrote: > Just wondering if someone knows when 5.5-RELEASE will be out? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 09:17:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0E016A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6947543D49 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD59913C7E5; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:20:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7E57113C7E3; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:20:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B03813C404; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:20:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 04:20:33 -0500 (CDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Angelin Lalev In-Reply-To: <4462E4B5.8030105@sv-bg.com> Message-ID: <20060511041952.W20807@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <4462E4B5.8030105@sv-bg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intelligent way of dealing with dependancies in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0000 > I'm rather tired of having to update firefox port due security fixes and then > having to build the new versions of > glib, expat, and so on an so on, every one of which complains that tere are > older versions of the lib installed. > > I've tried pkg_delete -f and install of the newer version, but then all the > binaries in the system started complaining > because they don't find the exact version of the shared library they are > compiled with. > > What's the intelligent way of dealing with the problem? > (Prefferably the one which does not include downloading 600+ MB of source > every time :-( ) portupgrade... something close to portupgrade -rR firefox and you're done. i usually run with a -n first to see what it wants to upgrade... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 09:48:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0574E16A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from missingj@server645.servers101.com) Received: from server645.servers101.com (server645.servers101.com [69.57.184.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD7C43D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:48:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from missingj@server645.servers101.com) Received: from missingj by server645.servers101.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Fe7mR-0004Gg-Ej for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:48:23 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Chase Online Banking Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 05:48:23 -0400 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server645.servers101.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32102 32003] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - server645.servers101.com X-Source: /usr/local/bin/php X-Source-Args: php chase.php X-Source-Dir: /tmp/... /send MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Password change required! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:48:44 -0000 [chaseNew.gif] Password change required! Dear Chase Member, We recently have determined that different computers have logged in to your Chase account, and multiple password failures were present before the logons. We strongly advice CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD. If this is not completed by May 10 , 2006, we will be forced to suspend your account indefinitely, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. Thank you for your cooperation. [1]Click here to Change Your Password Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. We apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you for using Chase! _________________________________________________________________ Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. [pixel.gif] setstats 1 References 1. http://www.chaseonline.walliams.com/colappmgr/colportal/prospect.php?_nfpb=change_form From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 10:06:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA4C16A404 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E8D43D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:06:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 1341 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 10:06:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.50.128.35]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 May 2006 10:06:45 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:06:27 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Message-ID: <20060511120627.37cc5d31@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: <1147254334.715.9.camel@sn001.suedfac.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_UlXF9.NXr4bNVCv41FnknV7; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:06:48 -0000 --Sig_UlXF9.NXr4bNVCv41FnknV7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Axel S. Gruner > >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:46 AM > >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo > > > > > >Am Mittwoch, den 10.05.2006, 02:05 -0700 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: > >> My guess is it will be a long, long time before you see CDROMs > >> from anybody that have deleted Beastie and have the sex toy. > > > >At LinuxTag 2006 in Wiesbaden we had prepared a lot of CDs with the new > >Logo (what you call a "sex toy"?). We also used the new logo as a flag > >on our booth.=20 > >You will find a few pictures here:=20 > >http://www.encephalon.de/photo/bsd_bilder/lt2006/index.html > > > >So, the "long long time" was a really short time ;-). > > >=20 > I think you missed the part of the post where I said: >=20 > "people have to pay for, to see if those last as a product," >=20 > The context of the post made it pretty clear I was talking about > commercial CD's that are sold, not given away. Issue 3/2006 of the German magazine freeX has the new logo on its cover, on the included disc and it appears several times in the articles. http://www.cul.de/images/freex32006cg.jpg Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_UlXF9.NXr4bNVCv41FnknV7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYwy0jV8GA4rMKUQRAp9SAJ9ezCkBwJGtxVtme3PEbgwphxoWuACgnicO CvpK670ILsOsCabezDfQMcI= =A1rH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_UlXF9.NXr4bNVCv41FnknV7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 10:23:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAFC16A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naodtsighe@yahoo.com) Received: from web51712.mail.yahoo.com (web51712.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E39F43D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:23:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from naodtsighe@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 89107 invoked by uid 60001); 11 May 2006 10:23:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=w9l7/PFfKPI5ibu7fws/i/m8um3u8tfO4FWxAFPy99UuSQ7iNXvJbLdu9fg/CgiYe+AODFqvmY2LoqUUhl/velGy0q3OWgYXiKp1GGNTYVjg5E99T6RyqtlJrTqJMkkzLRf3VYYGRI/eoF9kjyEcEM2U2sYGkjlcOYyP5gKcwgk= ; Message-ID: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [196.200.96.130] by web51712.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 03:23:53 PDT Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:23:53 -0700 (PDT) From: NAOD TSIGHE To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:23:54 -0000 Hi, Is it possible to attach two monitors, 2keybord and 2 mouse to one PC, by just buying some card that will connect with a PC. I just want to know if it is possible for me to just buy 1 more monitor, a mouse and a keyboard so that two students could learn in one pc. and oppen two different programes at the same time. THANKS! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 10:25:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B0616A422 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reflex@rotten.com) Received: from omerta.atomics.org (omerta.atomics.org [216.218.248.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F83543D68 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:25:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reflex@rotten.com) Received: (qmail 10577 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2006 10:25:42 -0000 Message-ID: <20060511102542.10576.qmail@omerta.atomics.org> From: reflex@rotten.com To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:02:23 GMT X-Mailer: Mincemeat 0.0 (www.soylent.com) Cc: Subject: New FreeBSD logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:25:37 -0000 Oh my gosh, I thought people were exagerating about the sextoy logo, but after some late night research i found this, and was frankly disgusted. http://www.toy-company.co.uk/index.html?target=p_1876.html&lang=en-gb It's like Linux having a midget in a PVC Nun outfit and calling him "Fux the Penguin". Best of luck, reflex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 10:37:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6466E16A410 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@u15185610.onlinehome-server.com) Received: from u15185610.onlinehome-server.com (u15185610.onlinehome-server.com [82.165.239.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8922543D55 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:37:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@u15185610.onlinehome-server.com) Received: (qmail 22543 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2006 06:19:04 -0400 Date: 11 May 2006 06:19:04 -0400 Message-ID: <20060511101904.22542.qmail@u15185610.onlinehome-server.com> To: questions@FreeBSD.org From: buy@asia-sourcing.com X-Mailer: PHP/4.3.10 Cc: Subject: Open New orders from Asia Sourcing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: buy@asia-sourcing.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:37:43 -0000 Dear Seller, Check for today's new open orders on asia sourcing now and get your deals! Buy 4-CHLORO-2,5-DIMETHOXYANILINE (1000T) from CN http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161271 Buy 2,4,5-trichloroaniline (100ton) from CN http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161270 Buy C-5IIB Seml-Automatic Stretch Blow Moulding Machine (1) from CO http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161269 Buy used Rotor spinning unit (5 set) from BD http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161267 Buy Roller Shoes (1000) from CA http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161237 Buy Sleepig bags, tents, all kind of camping items (1 x 40HQ) from AR http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161236 Buy Turn / Projected Window (20 ft. Comtainer) from JM http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161235 Buy electrical mosquito killer (20 feet container) from SN http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161213 Buy Basket Ball Shirt/Shorts Sets (1000/1500) from IT http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161212 Buy Gloves, Hats And Caps, ... (1500/2000 or more as first order) from IT http://asia-sourcing.net/bid.html?bid=161211 Regards, Asia Sourcing A Leading Sourcing Platform and Online Services Provider Search 2.2 million products from over 700,000 China and Other Asian Providers To unsubscribe from this mail list, please send email to unsubscribe@asia-sourcing.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 10:45:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FC916A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C62143D58 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:45:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 May 2006 10:45:19 -0000 Received: from 225.85.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO storage.mine.nu) [83.76.85.225] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 11 May 2006 12:45:19 +0200 X-Authenticated: #912863 Received: from storage.mine.nu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4BAjH6D011694 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:45:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@storage.mine.nu) Received: (from lars@localhost) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k4BAjHqX011693 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:45:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:45:17 +0200 From: lars To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511104517.GA11619@storage.mine.nu> References: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> <44621529.7050804@netfence.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44621529.7050804@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: OT: Torn between SCSI and SATA for RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:45:24 -0000 I recently read an interesting comparison on consumer and enterprise grade harddisks: http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf Maybe this helps. Kind regards Lars From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 10:51:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D930E16A409 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cknipe@savage.za.org) Received: from www16b.your-server.co.za (www16b.your-server.co.za [196.22.132.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7FA43D7B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:51:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cknipe@savage.za.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by www16b.your-server.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fe8lC-0001XM-Sd for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:13 +0200 Received: from 196-207-40-213.gprs.vodacom.co.za (196-207-40-213.gprs.vodacom.co.za [196.207.40.213]) by default.your-server.co.za (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:10 +0200 Message-ID: <1147344670.4463171eb5364@196.22.132.16> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:10 +0200 From: cknipe@savage.za.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> <44621529.7050804@netfence.it> <20060511104517.GA11619@storage.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20060511104517.GA11619@storage.mine.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 196.207.40.213 Subject: Re: OT: Torn between SCSI and SATA for RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:51:30 -0000 Quoting lars : > I recently read an interesting comparison > on consumer and enterprise grade harddisks: > http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf This was posted yesterday in responce to my question as well. That document deals mainly with the performance and reliability of the different types of hard drives (i.e. SATA vs SCSI). My questions that I'm posting is not really related towards the performance of the system, it's more towards the capacity of the system... I guess it boils down to the physical hardware... How does everything connect, how to expand systems, and how to run arrays bigger than what one single controller can provide... -- C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 11:24:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E628416A403 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: from shodan.nognu.de (shodan.nognu.de [85.14.216.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBA943D60 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:24:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steinex@nognu.de) Received: by shodan.nognu.de (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 273F4B81E; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:24:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:24:29 +0200 From: Frank Steinborn To: Pablo Mora Mail-Followup-To: Pablo Mora , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Message-Id: <20060511112429.273F4B81E@shodan.nognu.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limit bandwidth 'make fetch' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:24:32 -0000 Pablo Mora wrote: > how i can limit bandwidth when i using 'make fetch' (make install in Ports)? > > thanks in advance. You could use the following in your make.conf to use wget (which is capable of limiting bandwith) in your make.conf: FETCH_CMD=/usr/local/bin/wget --limit-rate=20k # Limits to 20k DISABLE_SIZE=YES DISABLE_SIZE is mandatory for wget, because it would get "-S " otherwise, which is only supported by fetch. HTH, Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 11:28:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BB616A405 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A977B43D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:28:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57F85E22; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:28:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTuL6Oe3ipSs; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:28:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-160-235-217.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.235.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26BB5C44; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:28:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44631FC1.4020603@mac.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:28:01 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Jayson Alvarez References: <20060511012211.12062.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060511012211.12062.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it recommended to allow all outgoing connections from your firewall?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:28:05 -0000 Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: > I've seen most people allow all outgoing traffic > originating from the firewall itself... Is this really > recommended?? > No. It's highly desirable to perform egress filtering if possible, but many people lack the time or the detailed knowledge to determine what outbound ports that they really need to use. Simply blocking port 6667 can provide a lot of protection against botnets because ICC is so commonly used as the control channel. [ RFC-2196 recommends doing outbound packet-filtering. ] -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 11:37:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6170016A440 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shiemstra@h2.com) Received: from hermes.h2web.com (mx1.h2web.com [67.132.72.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 711EF43D7D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:36:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shiemstra@h2.com) Received: (qmail 8841 invoked by uid 1011); 11 May 2006 07:36:37 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO hanky) (192.168.1.3) by hermes.h2web.com with SMTP; 11 May 2006 07:36:37 -0400 From: "Scott Hiemstra" To: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:38:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <44628357.3020402@calarts.edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZ0kNQlCUey1ATaRCKJ9ODjSxpAMQAXcSjg Message-Id: <20060511113643.711EF43D7D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: ftp server with no shell accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:37:20 -0000 > I tried the default ftp server with FreeBSD 5.4 and users > with no shell > accounts but it does not work. > > Does anyone know of a ftp server that users would still have home > directories but no shell access /sbin/nologin and that could still > upload files to there home directories. The default ftpd will work with a little tweaking. 1. touch /bin/ftpshell 2. echo "/bin/ftpshell" >> /etc/shells 3. When you add your users, set their shell to /bin/ftpshell 4. echo USERNAME >> /etc/ftpchroot The users will be able to login via ftp and nothing else because there shell is a crap fake shell. The ftpchroot will lock them into their home directory very effectively. Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 11:54:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445E216A418 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5510743D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so203126pye for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:54:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q/+wAFMaSNZDTlqmie9q32al8VnI2ZRaNQ0vfvRZiOOyMu23xqfGp/X2tqYG8tEVIAJHa2axqfw2WGq8fQXOmbhN/h8Lcf28EM+5AUN1hLe1c82IIDo3Gfd6fkFO3uDdhSpNRWlxqQfrD0pUNsddfyP2669dNgsSk+EOHUyyZ8I= Received: by 10.35.22.17 with SMTP id z17mr413669pyi; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.22.10 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:54:18 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "Riemer Palstra" , "mohammad babaei" , freebsd In-Reply-To: <20060511081051.GA70884@rb1.palstra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5bf3a41f0605110053u38db8543ifd2f6a11a555e24d@mail.gmail.com> <20060511081051.GA70884@rb1.palstra.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Mysql FreeBSD 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:54:20 -0000 On 5/11/06, Riemer Palstra wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 12:23:25PM +0430, Mohamad Babaei wrote: > > Has anyone installed Mysql 4.x or 5.x on FreeBSD 6.x in a production > > environment? > > Quite a few I think. > > > Is the problem with FreeBSD threading is still exist? > > See these Wiki pages: http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/MySQL > > Switching to libthr has given quite excellent performance on FreeBSD 6.0 > with MySQL 5.0.x for me... How does one do that? I read the wiki page but didn't find any info about how to apply the switch libpthread -> libthr.. Thanx > > -- > Riemer Palstra Amsterdam, The Netherlands > riemer@palstra.com http://www.palstra.com/ --=20 Pietro Cerutti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 12:00:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A83A16A57E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arsptr@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail25.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail25.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4CD43D49 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:59:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arsptr@optusnet.com.au) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c211-30-182-34.rivrw1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.182.34]) by mail25.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4BBxsBX011818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 11 May 2006 21:59:54 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20060511105934.76e4dad7@localhost> References: <3655B84C-03FA-454B-A601-72DCEE8AE4E7@optusnet.com.au> <20060511105934.76e4dad7@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--609618072" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alastair Rankine Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:59:49 +1000 To: Norberto Meijome X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Gpgmail-State: signed X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem corruption when drives are mirrored, but not otherwise X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:00:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-1--609618072 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 11/05/2006, at 10:59 AM, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2006 22:45:10 +1000 > Alastair Rankine wrote: > >> Disabling write >> caching seems to have fixed the problem. > > excuse my ignorance, but where do you do this? BIOS? Set hw.ata.wc="0" in /boot/loader.conf See tuning(7) for more info. > I'm running GEOM mirrors on amd64 with SATA (I assume you mean PATA > when you > say ATA). Nope, I'm using SATA on a Promise FastTrak S150 TX2plus. What controller are you using? Do you get a decent write speed? cstream -o tmpfile -v 1 -n 384m -i - ... is a good benchmark for sequential writes (cstream is in the ports). --Apple-Mail-1--609618072 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkRjJzkACgkQ9jqa2eRLIceSGQCfaIJNRet4+WLflg+Mf9sXTGGv zVcAnRe8QMv83ymfhtXSNr7Ou2K7qXgS =wr34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-1--609618072-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 12:01:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B8A16A5C3 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp109.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1119A43D55 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from strbenjr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 29518 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 12:01:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=i/J6smAzPaAecDqGev+sIuwxIo7n/dQo2hbOk8WePECpvsZNBsXoSMyKPU1LKIlrInSwcepYLkgM3ujdIqAGaX9csWkFcEr2mJ4/FOfTU3Y2tgZDgWDpFn0KxuUUHzT3ZuYF0CUgxb7Q8dO4GtdqlOIq2GbXAHV+okNIGo4loCs= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.7.202?) (strbenjr@69.143.43.222 with plain) by smtp109.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 May 2006 12:01:37 -0000 Message-ID: <4463279B.7080108@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:01:31 -0400 From: Ben Hacker Jr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051005) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Withers References: <4460757B.5030107@yahoo.com> <4461D83A.8030902@yahoo.com> <20060510151919.461f329a@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <4462C15D.5090203@yahoo.com> <59218.150.203.2.85.1147329415.squirrel@nickwithers.com> In-Reply-To: <59218.150.203.2.85.1147329415.squirrel@nickwithers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Adi Pircalabu , questions FBSD Subject: Re: Upgrade 5.4 - 6.0 errors. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:01:48 -0000 That was IT! ! ! -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Kernel build for HACK06 completed on Thu May 11 07:54:10 EDT 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks!! Can someone add the word (-Required-) to the comments on that line please?? Like on "device USB" Nick Withers wrote: >G'day Ben! > >On Thu, 11 May, 2006 2:45 pm, Ben Hacker Jr wrote: > > >>I have posted my complete Kernel config file below. >> >> > >I _believe_ you need include the wlan device. > > > >>Maybe I need to enable the "CAM infrastructure."?? >> >>Adi Pircalabu wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:10:34 -0400 Ben Hacker Jr wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>linking kernel.debug >>>>if_ural.o(.text+0x3bb): In function `ural_attach': >>>>/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:458: undefined reference to >>>>`ieee80211_ieee2mhz' >>>>if_ural.o(.text+0x3ef):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c:463: undefined >>>>reference to `ieee80211_ieee2mhz' >>>> >>>'m afraid you customized your config file by commenting a mandatory >>>device / option which is needed for building. Please post your complete >>>config file. >>>OTOH, can you build GENERIC? >>> >># HACK06 -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386 >># >> >> > >(snip) > > > >>## Wireless NIC cards >>#device wlan # 802.11 support >>#device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. >>#device awi # BayStack 660 and others >>#device ral # Ralink Technology RT2500 wireless NICs. >>#device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. >>##device wl # Older non 802.11 Wavelan wireless NIC. >> >># Pseudo devices. >>device loop # Network loopback >>device random # Entropy device >>device ether # Ethernet support >>device sl # Kernel SLIP >>device ppp # Kernel PPP >>device tun # Packet tunnel. >>device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) >>device md # Memory "disks" >>device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling >>device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) >> >># The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. >># Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! >># Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. >>device bpf # Berkeley packet filter >> >># USB support >>device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface >>device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface >>#device ehci # EHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 2.0) >>device usb # USB Bus (required) >>#device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices >>device ugen # Generic >>#device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" >>device ukbd # Keyboard >>device ulpt # Printer >>device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da >>device ums # Mouse >>device ural # Ralink Technology RT2500USB wireless NICs >>device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player >>device uscanner # Scanners >>## USB Ethernet, requires miibus >>#device aue # ADMtek USB Ethernet >>#device axe # ASIX Electronics USB Ethernet >>#device cdce # Generic USB over Ethernet >>#device cue # CATC USB Ethernet >>#device kue # Kawasaki LSI USB Ethernet >>#device rue # RealTek RTL8150 USB Ethernet >> >># FireWire support >>device firewire # FireWire bus code >>device sbp # SCSI over FireWire (Requires scbus and da) >>device fwe # Ethernet over FireWire (non-standard!) >> >>-- >> Ben Hacker, Jr. >> Network Security Analyst >> strbenjr {at} yahoo.com >>-- -- -- >> >> Ben Hacker, Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 12:13:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E27C16A4D9 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21D143D75 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:13:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4BCDSEY028981; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:13:29 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:09:58 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <5bf3a41f0605110053u38db8543ifd2f6a11a555e24d@mail.gmail.com> <20060511081051.GA70884@rb1.palstra.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605111509.58699.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: mohammad babaei , Pietro Cerutti Subject: Re: Mysql FreeBSD 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:13:41 -0000 On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:54, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 5/11/06, Riemer Palstra wrote: > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 12:23:25PM +0430, Mohamad Babaei wrote: > > > Has anyone installed Mysql 4.x or 5.x on FreeBSD 6.x in a production > > > environment? > > > > Quite a few I think. > > > > > Is the problem with FreeBSD threading is still exist? > > > > See these Wiki pages: http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/MySQL > > > > Switching to libthr has given quite excellent performance on FreeBSD 6.0 > > with MySQL 5.0.x for me... > > How does one do that? I read the wiki page but didn't find any info > about how to apply the switch libpthread -> libthr.. > Very easily. man 5 libmap.conf has configuration examples > Thanx > > > -- > > Riemer Palstra Amsterdam, The Netherlands > > riemer@palstra.com http://www.palstra.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 12:27:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE2E16A413 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from palstra.com (palstra.com [82.201.5.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3E043D55 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:27:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from riemer by palstra.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FeAG1-000N5Z-Cx; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:27:05 +0200 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:27:05 +0200 From: Riemer Palstra To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20060511122705.GC85518@rb1.palstra.com> References: <5bf3a41f0605110053u38db8543ifd2f6a11a555e24d@mail.gmail.com> <20060511081051.GA70884@rb1.palstra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: mohammad babaei , freebsd Subject: Re: Mysql FreeBSD 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:27:12 -0000 On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:54:18PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > How does one do that? I read the wiki page but didn't find any info > about how to apply the switch libpthread -> libthr.. My /etc/libmap.conf looks something like this: [mysqld] libc_r.so.5 libthr.so.2 libc_r.so.6 libthr.so.2 libthr.so.2 libthr.so.2 libpthread.so.1 libthr.so.2 libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 -- Riemer Palstra Amsterdam, The Netherlands riemer@palstra.com http://www.palstra.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 12:47:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2323616A403 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakbeatz@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFAC44320 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jakbeatz@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so167847nzf for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:47:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PS6JDtBXpkAHJ1OX4piKFHwEQ7QS7418bemx6GqJ/6+CobeoDb0YQenwlIbEr1rIy1lK+wMUMOmTZZIGaqgcb69+zDc+hk7wE0nqe2TvZC3RFcdQlwNNv9rXD40xByLa9/l/b5BUMt79BMCbigZXqiUvV2oo2BXSycKGgx8pRFc= Received: by 10.64.150.1 with SMTP id x1mr396910qbd; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.35.10 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4993f7e10605110547q7ed8860es1fd3b4c9293a883e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:47:11 -0400 From: Questions To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <838748D8-6425-415F-918B-04429636C970@shire.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4993f7e10605102257r5740c3b9p267a511ef055c238@mail.gmail.com> <838748D8-6425-415F-918B-04429636C970@shire.net> Cc: Subject: Re: I2O vs. Mass Storage Modes on Dell Perc Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:47:13 -0000 On 5/11/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > On May 10, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Questions wrote: > > > I just installed 6.1 on a Dell PowerEdge 1850 and the RAID adapter was > > initially set for Mass Storage mode. I read that I2O mode is a better > > mode, so I flipped it to I2O, and the machine booted fine. For some > > reason this confuses me. I would assume that my changing the > > emulation of the RAID Adapter would cause the machine to no longer > > boot. Am I wrong in this assumption and switching between emulation > > modes should not affect booting? > > Disclaimer: I probably don't know what I am talking about and am not > familiar with the various modes of the Dell RAID controller etc. > > Why would you expect it to affect booting? I suspect that the > machines BIOS makes the RAID available no matter what the mode and > that the boot happens on the "bios" disk (through a "bios" interface). > > Again, this is not my area of knowledge but that is what I am guessing. > I really can't give you a good answer :) I think it's just an assumption based on ignorance. I've had alot of problems in the past with booting, hard drives, etc so I think it was natural for me to think a change to the array like that would affect booting. I would agree with your point, that the BIOS would make the raid available no matter what the mode is, but I read something in the Dell docs that I2O required Dell Drivers. I think that's what also triggered the assumption of breakage :) http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/storage/RAID/66JVW/BIOS_Utl.htm#Objec= ts_Menu (Scroll down to Table 4 under Emulation) it mentiones the difference between I2O and Mass Storage. One needing Dell drivers specifically, the other needed Dell Drivers or OS drivers. That was the natual progression for me to think that if I changed this setting, it would use a different driver, thus affecting the bootup. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 12:51:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCE416A511 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1A444059 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:32:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so212251pye for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oQw9UBgzz2qBRjDw8G9vwscQQb7YKUIOgFPv8l335m+rzUh+7S9XVPqd2u9kZ68AKWUM9Bin+tX4DcvSi/a2RIUHLZ7lBN/P8PEo9n7sZm9C5E3eHc8idn6gZJhtCZhcljWTbhzlgLEbdO77gtqnk3IOlR5wqiY5K/e+NO9gswI= Received: by 10.35.17.8 with SMTP id u8mr400408pyi; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.13.3 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:32:09 -0400 From: "David Stanford" To: "reflex@rotten.com" In-Reply-To: <20060511102542.10576.qmail@omerta.atomics.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060511102542.10576.qmail@omerta.atomics.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:16 -0000 Why, oh why, would you post this? So help me to understand...The FreeBSD Project takes great effort in not only producing a truly _great_ operating system, trademarked as being fast, robust, stable and secure, provides it to the world for _free_, but also takes on the additional chore of attempting to promote its growth in the corporate market by introducing a new logo...and then some, all for the community. And your repayment is to aid in these, now, endless rants of verbal bashing of the Project's logo, which had an obvious goal of gaining wider popularity among busnesses for the purposes of making it bigger and better for, yes, _you_ and every other one of its users. Maybe I'm going out on a limb here, and maybe I'm solo dangling out there on it, but I feel a need to say something in defense. They spent much valued donation money for the logo and in legal fees, I'm sure, to obtain it, so I would assume (and hope) it's here to stay. Furthermore, by continuing to post threads like this you (and others) are hardly contributing to the Project (or this list) and, in fact, are doing the exact opposite - you are attempting to destroy the new logo's image by imaturely calling it a "sex toy" and in turn are slowly taking away from those precious dollars put into aquiring it. Maybe it's not the greatest logo, but, regardless, the logo doesn't affect the code. Try to keep that in mind. FreeBSD is a gift. And anyone who doesn't see that should take another look at Microsoft's pricing options for a simple Home edition of XP (now $99, five years after its initial release). Please do the community a favor: Just say thanks and move along. **Of course, this was not aimed at the general community, but more specifically at the folks wasting everyone's inbox space the past few days with this nonsense.** -David On 5/11/06, reflex@rotten.com < reflex@rotten.com> wrote: > Oh my gosh, > > I thought people were exagerating about the sextoy logo, but after some l= ate > night research i found this, and was frankly disgusted. > > http://www.toy-company.co.uk/index.html?target=3Dp_1876.html&lang=3Den-= gb > > It's like Linux having a midget in a PVC Nun outfit and calling him "Fux = the > Penguin". > > Best of luck, > > > reflex > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 12:56:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B6516A449 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96AC43DA2 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:55:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so220391pye for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:55:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cJGafShxKospVaJN6veIrAlGWkTt90NADBoGLcPRJtrgQl/oUpE3gvdi+sCrSjCQnI5QHaldeK5K0MoawqZGVxxWumRZagPYrfTcJzaEHGIdvIw1bHFUw6J8fUD7MhtSIObqW0rsWAYsEvxPq1rSHvJFBr1/JPPy543ZVpxANx8= Received: by 10.35.99.5 with SMTP id b5mr1063011pym; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.22.10 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:55:45 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: freebsd In-Reply-To: <20060511122705.GC85518@rb1.palstra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5bf3a41f0605110053u38db8543ifd2f6a11a555e24d@mail.gmail.com> <20060511081051.GA70884@rb1.palstra.com> <20060511122705.GC85518@rb1.palstra.com> Cc: mohammad babaei , nvass@teledomenet.gr Subject: Re: Mysql FreeBSD 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:56:05 -0000 On 5/11/06, Riemer Palstra wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:54:18PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > How does one do that? I read the wiki page but didn't find any info > > about how to apply the switch libpthread -> libthr.. > > My /etc/libmap.conf looks something like this: > > [mysqld] > libc_r.so.5 libthr.so.2 > libc_r.so.6 libthr.so.2 > libthr.so.2 libthr.so.2 > libpthread.so.1 libthr.so.2 > libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 Thanx, that worked with minor change due to my libraries versions. > > -- > Riemer Palstra Amsterdam, The Netherlands > riemer@palstra.com http://www.palstra.com/ > --=20 Pietro Cerutti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 13:04:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1D216A424 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tps@vr-web.de) Received: from mx0.vr-web.de (mx0.vr-web.de [195.200.35.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C3643D5F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:04:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tps@vr-web.de) Received: from mx0.vr-web.de (vrwf203.vrweb.de [::ffff:192.168.27.26]) by mx0.vr-web.de with esmtp; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:04:13 +0200 id 0008FBC1.4463364D.00002173 Received: from [192.168.1.11] (p549E096D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [::ffff:84.158.9.109]) (QVVUSDogTE9HSU4gdHBzLCBUTFM6IFRMU3YxL1NTTHYzLDI1NmJpdHMsQUVTMjU2LVNIQQ==) by mx0.vr-web.de with esmtp; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:04:12 +0200 id 000B7AA8.4463364C.00005034 Message-ID: <44633649.4030805@vr-web.de> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:04:09 +0200 From: Thomas Schweikle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060502 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BitDefender-Scanner: Clean, Agent: BitDefender Courier MTA Agent 1.6.2 on vrwebmail Cc: Subject: RELENG_6 does not compile on RELENG_5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:04:21 -0000 Since it is impossible to use the report generator at the moment, because of error: "There is an error in the configuration of the problem report form generator. Please back up one page and report the problem to the owner of that page. Report 84.158.9.109 is an open proxy server." Category: misc Severity: serious Priority: medium Class: sw-bug Which FreeBSD Release You Are Using: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE Environment (output of "uname -a" on the problem machine): FreeBSD hazel.tps 5.5-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE #58: Sun May 7 13:21:56 CEST 2006 screen@hazel.tps:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAZEL i386 Full Description: #make buildworld ... /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/growfs created for /usr/src/sbin/growfs ===> sbin/gvinum (obj) /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/gvinum created for /usr/src/sbin/gvinum ===> sbin/ifconfig (obj) /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ifconfig created for /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig ===> sbin/init (obj) /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/init created for /usr/src/sbin/init ===> sbin/ip6fw (obj) /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ip6fw created for /usr/src/sbin/ip6fw ===> sbin/ipf (obj) ===> sbin/ipf/libipf (obj) /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf created for /usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf ===> sbin/ipf/ipf (obj) mkdir: /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf: File exists *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sbin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. It does not help to remove the file "ipf", then recreate it as directory: in this case the "Makefile" in "/usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf" is missing: "I don't know how to make ..." How to Repeat the Problem: - check out RELENG_6: cvsup -g -L 2 -r 2 /etc/sup/hazel-supfile where "/etc/sup/hazel-supfile": # $FreeBSD: hazel-supfile,v 1.19.2.6 2002/08/06 08:24:46 blackend Exp $ *default host=cvsup.de.freebsd.org #default host=cvsup.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default delete use-rel-suffix compress src-all release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 ports-all release=cvs tag=. - run mergemaster mergemaster -p - edit all files which are needed to be changed vipw vi /etc/group - change to "/usr/src" - make buildworld -- Thomas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 13:39:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626DD16A405 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7F0443A7 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:39:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 1746 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 13:39:52 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 May 2006 13:39:52 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CEFC228425; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:39:50 -0400 (EDT) To: Bryan Curl References: <4461F2BA.8080904@pcisys.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:39:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4461F2BA.8080904@pcisys.net> (Bryan Curl's message of "Wed, 10 May 2006 08:03:38 -0600") Message-ID: <44ody44r4p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1_RELEASE / mergemaster error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:39:59 -0000 Bryan Curl writes: > I humbly apologize if this is a repost. Googles Gmail has been very > unpredictable lately, so in frustration I am resending this from my ol' > faithful ISP mailbox since last nights post never seemed to make it to > the list. > > I am upgrading from 6.1_RC (something like that) to 6.1_RELEASE using > CVSUp & RELENG_6.1 tag > After make installworld I ran the final run through of mergemaster and > received this error: > > ERROR CODE 64 > FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'dc' into /usr/src/etc/ and install files to the > temproot environment. > > Cant say how far it got before this error but it looked like it was > going along pretty good. > Upon reboot there were at least one system files missing, like hosts. > I'm not sure if other files failed to copy on as well. > I was in single user mode and did the fsck and mounts as described in > the manual. I chmod 777 on that directory but that did not help. > > Also noticed samba did not start from rc.conf although it loads and runs > from the prompt. But these may or may not be a symptom of the error. > > Should I be concerned about this? How I fix and move on? Sounds like you had disk problems of some sort; do you remember when and what? Try running "mergemaster -av" and see if it gives you more of a clue. If you don't understand the output, we'll take a look at it; I don't think I have enough information to diagnose your issues now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 13:40:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3E616A47C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc3910@pcisys.net) Received: from ampex.com (postal.ampex.com [65.201.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18001442AA for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:19:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc3910@pcisys.net) Received: from newman.ampex.com (newman.ampex.com [136.185.151.32]) by ampex.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4BDJbVi012066 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (cos-pc-143 [136.185.151.143]) by newman.ampex.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4BDJYIn022312 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:19:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <446339DE.204@pcisys.net> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:19:26 -0600 From: bc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44626D1F.4030307@pcisys.net> <20060510174502.D5513@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> In-Reply-To: <20060510174502.D5513@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 3, autolearn=not spam) Subject: Re: 6.1_RELEASE Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:41:17 -0000 Ok, let's assume for now that something was wrong with the makefile or there was a glitch in the make/install process. (I have only updated once before so I have never had to recover from something like this.) Would it be ok to simply repeat the entire process, minus the cvsup part? Is it also possible that I answered some questions wrong in the first 'mergemaster -p' go through? Should I also .... before I start .... #cd /usr/src #make clean Luke Dean wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 May 2006, bc wrote: > >> Ceri Davies wrote: >> >>> On 10/5/06 05:03, "bc" wrote: >>> >>> >>>> After make installworld I ran the final run thru of mergemaster and >>>> recived >>>> this error: >>>> >>>> ERROR CODE 64 >>>> FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'dc' into /usr/src/etc/ and install files to the >>>> temproot environment. >>>> >>> >>> Did you cut and paste that, or copy it in manually? >>> >>> Ceri >>> >> Now that I am in front of the derver here is the full message (with a >> few lines before) pasted: >> >> install -o root -g wheel -m 640 /dev/null >> /var/tmp/temproot/var/log/sendmail.st >> install -o root -g wheel -m 644 freebsd.cf >> /var/tmp/temproot/etc/mail/sendmail.cf >> install -o root -g wheel -m 444 freebsd.submit.cf >> /var/tmp/temproot/etc/mail/submit.cf >> cd /usr/src/etc; install -o root -g wheel -m 644 >> /var/tmp/temproot/etc/ssh >> usage: install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] >> [-o owner] file1 file2 >> install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] >> [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory >> install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... >> *** Error code 64 >> >> Stop in /usr/src/etc. >> >> *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src/etc and install files to >> the temproot environment >> >> /usr/src Walnut SuperUser#> > > "install" is being run with a blank space where the program name > should be. That's what it's complaining about. It does not look like > a directory problem or a permissions problem. > I'd say that something is wrong with a makefile that builds ssh or > with your "make" configuration. > > I'm afraid I don't know enough about the "make" process to say more > than that, but perhaps if you can specify which platform you're > building for and the contents of /etc/make.conf somebody more > knowledgable might be able to help. > > Luke > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 14:31:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFDC16A4D4 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc3910@pcisys.net) Received: from ampex.com (postal.ampex.com [65.201.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E8A43E06 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:57:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc3910@pcisys.net) Received: from newman.ampex.com (newman.ampex.com [136.185.151.32]) by ampex.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4BDuwVi012908 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (cos-pc-143 [136.185.151.143]) by newman.ampex.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4BDuvIn023786 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:56:58 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <446342A4.9080804@pcisys.net> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:56:52 -0600 From: bc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4461F2BA.8080904@pcisys.net> <44ody44r4p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44ody44r4p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.227, required 3, HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: 6.1_RELEASE / mergemaster error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:31:19 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Bryan Curl writes: > > >> I humbly apologize if this is a repost. Googles Gmail has been very >> unpredictable lately, so in frustration I am resending this from my ol' >> faithful ISP mailbox since last nights post never seemed to make it to >> the list. >> >> I am upgrading from 6.1_RC (something like that) to 6.1_RELEASE using >> CVSUp & RELENG_6.1 tag >> After make installworld I ran the final run through of mergemaster and >> received this error: >> >> ERROR CODE 64 >> FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'dc' into /usr/src/etc/ and install files to the >> temproot environment. >> >> Cant say how far it got before this error but it looked like it was >> going along pretty good. >> Upon reboot there were at least one system files missing, like hosts. >> I'm not sure if other files failed to copy on as well. >> I was in single user mode and did the fsck and mounts as described in >> the manual. I chmod 777 on that directory but that did not help. >> >> Also noticed samba did not start from rc.conf although it loads and runs >> from the prompt. But these may or may not be a symptom of the error. >> >> Should I be concerned about this? How I fix and move on? >> > > Sounds like you had disk problems of some sort; do you remember when > and what? > > Try running "mergemaster -av" and see if it gives you more of a clue. > If you don't understand the output, we'll take a look at it; I don't > think I have enough information to diagnose your issues now. > > > Disk should be healthy, but I wonder if I ran out of space in one of the slices. Maybe /var was full. I used the full disk and auto-defaults when I set the disk up under 6.0_RELEASE a few months ago. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 14:32:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D0516A641 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FBB445D1 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:14:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k4BEE8In020859; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:14:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k4BEE7Q2020858; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:14:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200605111414.k4BEE7Q2020858@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: martinkov@pobox.sk (martinko) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:14:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:32:24 -0000 > > jad@nominet.org.uk wrote: > > owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17: > > > >> hi, > >> > >> On 5/9/06, Bill Moran wrote: > >> > >>> Then take this to chat@freebsd.org. It's just flame bait here. > >> I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended > >> up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think it's a big joke? > >> The new logo already looks dated, and will only get worse with time. > >> > > > > This happened ages ago and was announced in the news section of the > > website > > > > See - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ > > > > John > > it was only announced after the selection was over. freebsd users were > not involved. this is not right. :-( that is not true. The intent to change the logo - or create one - was announced and a "contest" for choosing a logo was announced and entries were solicited well before the choice of logo was done. > also, the other entries were not published. so we can't really compare. That is true and I think that may have been a poor choice but it probably would have resulted in even more noise on the lists rather than less. > it seems like the whole thing was intended to be quiet and public was > just left out of the process. Not completely left out, but less involved than might be ideal. I just wish the FreeBSD community had more ability to create meaningful logos. Their talents seem to all lie in the area of creating and managing software systems... By the way, here where I work, they made a big fuss and came up with a new 'logo' that we are required to have on our cards and such and it is totally meaningless and unrelated to what our department is or does. It is, at least a little bit artsey and attractice, but I think this logo problem is endemic in the field. ////jerry > > martin > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 14:36:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E45716A561 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAA943D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:36:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4BEZsJV051197; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:35:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <44634BC1.40407@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:35:45 -0500 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fbsd@a1poweruser.com, cpghost , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:36:15 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> To those taking affront at such answers, no one is saying "oh, fork >> you!" in some intentionally rude or belittling way (at least, I'm >> not), they're saying forking (process-wise) to the appropriate forum >> is the logical thing to do. >> > > I take affront to such answers because of the simple fact that it's > obvious that your perfectly valid answer isn't a real answer. A real > answer would be something that would get rid of this continual > resurgence of this discussion. Thus the suggestion that folks pursue it in a forum where PR might actually be germane, and in a way that might actually bear results. Continual barking on questions@ about how upset folks are has got to be among the very least effective ways of seeking change (other than changes to killfiles). > Based on responses I'd estimate about 60% of FBSD users didn't want > the logo changed before the contest. > > Based on responses post-contest results, I think about 90% of users hate > the new logo. Despite what 24-hour cable news channels might like to have us believe, % self-selected email senders <> % actually holding opinions. Asserting that these are valid statistics is nonsense. Like many folks who really don't care about the logo all that much one way or the other, I simply won't be reading or posting on this subject any more (making any future post counts that much less valid as statistics). -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 14:37:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE25B16A42B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8597443D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:37:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from hera.int.dfwlp.com (hera.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4BEbLkw060191 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:37:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:37:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605110937.20631.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: php5 and mod_php5 for apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:37:37 -0000 im scratching my head here, and kicking myself for not already having a better understanding about how things work during compile (i have 0% skill in any programming language... except *basic*html... which dont consider worthy of being called a skill *wink*) my production system, was recently reinstalled as 6.0-RELEASE, and cvsup'd to 6.1-RC (about 1 week or so before 6.1-RELEASE came out). from ports, i installed apache 2.0 just fine, then php5 and php5-extensions, the same way i always do. i even have my own documentation for the exact order i compile each port on every production and development system i build. the php5 version listed in pkg_info on my production server says php5-5.1.2_1. now, my problem: i have a development system that i installed as 6.0-RELEASE, and cvsup'd to 6.1-STABLE. exact same port installation order, apache 2.0, then php5, then php5-extensions. the php5 version listed in pkg_info now says php5-5.1.4, and after compiling both ports, the libphp5.so line does not appear in httpd.conf, and libphp5.so cannot be found on the system (on my production system, both the actual file in /usr/libexec/apache2 and the line in httpd.conf appeared automatically). i cannot understand where i am going wrong here, can someone shed some light for me? thanks, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 14:47:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE54816A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A35743D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:47:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from hera.int.dfwlp.com (hera.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4BElBSx060263 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:47:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:47:10 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605110937.20631.freebsd@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200605110937.20631.freebsd@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605110947.10522.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: php5 and mod_php5 for apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:47:25 -0000 On Thursday 11 May 2006 09:37, Jonathan Horne wrote: > im scratching my head here, and kicking myself for not already having a > better understanding about how things work during compile (i have 0% skill > in any programming language... except *basic*html... which dont consider > worthy of being called a skill *wink*) > > my production system, was recently reinstalled as 6.0-RELEASE, and cvsup'd > to 6.1-RC (about 1 week or so before 6.1-RELEASE came out). from ports, i > installed apache 2.0 just fine, then php5 and php5-extensions, the same way > i always do. i even have my own documentation for the exact order i > compile each port on every production and development system i build. the > php5 version listed in pkg_info on my production server says php5-5.1.2_1. > > now, my problem: > i have a development system that i installed as 6.0-RELEASE, and cvsup'd to > 6.1-STABLE. exact same port installation order, apache 2.0, then php5, > then php5-extensions. the php5 version listed in pkg_info now says > php5-5.1.4, and after compiling both ports, the libphp5.so line does not > appear in httpd.conf, and libphp5.so cannot be found on the system (on my > production system, both the actual file in /usr/libexec/apache2 and the > line in httpd.conf appeared automatically). > > i cannot understand where i am going wrong here, can someone shed some > light for me? > > thanks, > jonathan > _______________________________________________ well, i guess i figured it out. Makefile is not the same as previous versions. OPTIONS= APACHE "Build Apache module" off i changed it to on, and restarted my compile. im kind of curious if this is something that was intended, or did it slip through release management with an improper configuration? jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 14:55:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0CA16A4E5 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richard@firebadger.net) Received: from mail.firebadger.net (82-69-4-157.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.4.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EF4A43D5C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:55:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@firebadger.net) Received: (qmail 67567 invoked by uid 1011); 11 May 2006 14:58:17 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.10 by brian.firebadger.net (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88.1/1449. spamassassin: 3.1.1. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(192.168.1.10):SA:0(-4.1/5.0):. Processed in 0.658189 secs); 11 May 2006 14:58:17 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-FIREBADGER-Mail-From: richard@firebadger.net via brian.firebadger.net X-Antivirus-FIREBADGER: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(192.168.1.10):SA:0(-4.1/5.0):. Processed in 0.658189 secs Process 67559) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.10?) (richard@firebadger.net@192.168.1.10) by mail.firebadger.net with SMTP; 11 May 2006 14:58:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4463504C.3040200@firebadger.net> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:55:08 +0100 From: Richard Collyer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200605110937.20631.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <200605110947.10522.freebsd@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200605110947.10522.freebsd@dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: php5 and mod_php5 for apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:55:28 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > > well, i guess i figured it out. Makefile is not the same as previous > versions. > > OPTIONS= APACHE "Build Apache module" off > > i changed it to on, and restarted my compile. im kind of curious if this is > something that was intended, or did it slip through release management with > an improper configuration? AFAIK mod_php5 has been canned and only php5 with the apache option is now availible. Cheers Richard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:07:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F4916A4EB for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B593943D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:07:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AE51A4D9E; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C681751601; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:07:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:07:41 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Timothy Beyer Message-ID: <20060511150741.GA69548@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <87k68tv4eo.wl%beyert@cs.ucr.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k68tv4eo.wl%beyert@cs.ucr.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Swap Performance in 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:07:43 -0000 --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0700, Timothy Beyer wrote: >=20 > I am curious if this problem has been resolved in 6.1: >=20 > (it was previously on the FreeBSD 6.1 Open Issues page, but I don't > see it there any more) > http://www.tr.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html >=20 > swapping on 6.0 is slower than on 4.x > Not done > "Performance on swap handling is much slower than 4.x and this can make= =20 > a system essentially unusable when moderate paging activity is going on" >=20 > Has this been resolved, (I did not see anything about it in the 6.1 > release notes, or the errata) or has it been deferred to a future > release? (The reason why I ask this is that programs like Firefox and > Xemacs use up all of my 1 GB of memory and I have noticed problems of > this nature in 6.0) The TODO item should have been worded better. There is anecdotal evidence that it is slower, but no-one has actually measured it definitively. Therefore it will be deferred until the future, after someone has actual numbers showing whether/how much slower it is, or not. Kris --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEY1M9Wry0BWjoQKURAjy8AJ9qiErLRfaidUUnW3KV8TU725lZGACg6Onr a+WlrRr6FSYiRFnJxnXleJc= =pmAG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:08:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABC216A504 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E99F43D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:08:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C161A4D9E; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 85DC9515DC; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:08:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:08:18 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kouji Ito Message-ID: <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:08:19 -0000 --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:47:07PM +0900, Kouji Ito wrote: > Hello, > I wait very much,too, but it is not readily released. > If there is a detailed person for circumstances in > 5.5-RELEASE situation, please teach it. Next week or so, now that 6.1 is out. Kris --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEY1NiWry0BWjoQKURAk8GAKCZagK6n2UvKg6ldrH6Nwry8w4jyACgzzZ6 V4CoWGWVr5jMuPD9jeAO93w= =8wSq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:10:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2A016A518 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457D343D5F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from hera.int.dfwlp.com (hera.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4BFA3R3060386 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:10:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:10:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605110937.20631.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <200605110947.10522.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <4463504C.3040200@firebadger.net> In-Reply-To: <4463504C.3040200@firebadger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605111010.02819.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: php5 and mod_php5 for apache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:10:05 -0000 On Thursday 11 May 2006 09:55, Richard Collyer wrote: > Jonathan Horne wrote: > > well, i guess i figured it out. Makefile is not the same as previous > > versions. > > > > OPTIONS= APACHE "Build Apache module" off > > > > i changed it to on, and restarted my compile. im kind of curious if this > > is something that was intended, or did it slip through release management > > with an improper configuration? > > AFAIK mod_php5 has been canned and only php5 with the apache option is > now availible. > > Cheers > Richard > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" well another difference i just noticed, the php 5.1.2 has: WITH_APACHE= yes and the 5.1.4 has nothing about this at all. even when i recompiled my previous attempt with the with apache build module on, i got nothing. do i need to add the WITH_APACHE=yes to the 5.1.4 Makefile? and if yes, why on earth is it omitted? jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:14:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95E316A432 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2D943D66 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:14:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FeCre-0001oJ-I7 by authid for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:14:06 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:14:06 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511151406.GB5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4462E4B5.8030105@sv-bg.com> <20060511041952.W20807@bravo.pjkh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060511041952.W20807@bravo.pjkh.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Intelligent way of dealing with dependancies in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:14:08 -0000 --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:20:33AM -0500, Philip Hallstrom wrote: > >I'm rather tired of having to update firefox port due security fixes and= =20 > >then having to build the new versions of > >glib, expat, and so on an so on, every one of which complains that tere= =20 > >are older versions of the lib installed. > > > >I've tried pkg_delete -f and install of the newer version, but then all= =20 > >the binaries in the system started complaining > >because they don't find the exact version of the shared library they are= =20 > >compiled with. > > > >What's the intelligent way of dealing with the problem? > >(Prefferably the one which does not include downloading 600+ MB of sourc= e=20 > >every time :-( ) >=20 > portupgrade... >=20 > something close to portupgrade -rR firefox and you're done. >=20 > i usually run with a -n first to see what it wants to upgrade... portmanager is also good for this sort of thing. # portmanager www/firefox -f -l will do pretty much the same thing as Philip's portupgrade command. If you keep your distfiles around, then you will only need to download any source files that have changed since last build (This applies to both portupgrade and portmanager). To help keep on top of distfiles and packages, you can use the portsclean utility that is installed as part of portupgrade. (I have both ports installed on my machines, as both are very useful.) HTH Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEY1S+ixf5fBYiFmoRAtTTAKDGGaJsNWJuj0dQBLhHDCA9Ux6i9QCeJ48o OquRNyzUJHUneQnM9+ZUt90= =7cFE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:20:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1846116A416 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs131.cnf.com (mail-cluster.cnf.com [63.230.177.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CC843D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:20:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs131.cnf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ljcqs131.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FBB194941; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com (cnfdcx-131-slb-01-in.cnf.com [10.0.108.131]) by ljcqs131.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33D19493C; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com ([10.40.10.68]) by ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 11 May 2006 08:20:28 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:20:17 -0500 Message-ID: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E0439138C@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Intelligent way of dealing with dependancies in ports Thread-Index: AcZ029wJ5Gh8/3PSQ/6FHVCnf7oH7AAMn0mw From: "Zimmerman, Eric" To: "Philip Hallstrom" , "Angelin Lalev" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2006 15:20:29.0770 (UTC) FILETIME=[701EDAA0:01C6750E] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Intelligent way of dealing with dependancies in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:20:34 -0000 > > > > What's the intelligent way of dealing with the problem? > > (Prefferably the one which does not include downloading 600+ MB of > source > > every time :-( ) >=20 > portupgrade... >=20 > something close to portupgrade -rR firefox and you're done. >=20 > i usually run with a -n first to see what it wants to upgrade... I find portmanager to do the trick when updating ports, including all dependencies. Works great From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:49:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C1E16A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BB8445E8 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:49:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 14750 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 15:49:22 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 May 2006 15:49:22 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DE59328425; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:49:21 -0400 (EDT) To: "Michael P. Soulier" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:49:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Michael P. Soulier's message of "Wed, 10 May 2006 21:17:42 -0400") Message-ID: <447j4ssgse.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting up a NAT gateway with PPPoE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:49:23 -0000 "Michael P. Soulier" writes: > People, > > I have just set up my 5.4 box as a gateway to my DSL connection. I > used this section of the freebsd handbook. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html > > I enabled NAT on the PPP connection, and viola, it works. You have musical accompaniment? > I still have to set up my firewall, but I'm curious about how natd works. > > Looking here > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-natd.html > > I tried to run natd, but I got an error that the socket type was not > supported. Do I really need to recompile the GENERIC kernel in 5.4 to > support NAT? Yes. See the section of that page titled "Configuration". > I'm also unclear about how to tell natd which local networks to NAT. The "divert" rule(s) in your ipfw configuration. > Also, why is NAT capability in both PPP and natd? Convenience. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:51:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F5E16A43C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apavone@eftel.com) Received: from tara1.wa.amnet.net.au (tara1.wa.amnet.net.au [203.161.126.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044EA445E8 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:51:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apavone@eftel.com) Received: (qmail 28434 invoked by uid 89); 11 May 2006 15:51:20 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 28422, pid: 28424, t: 0.8192s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.88/m:36/d:1310 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tara1.wa.amnet.net.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (203.161.72.123) by tara1.wa.amnet.net.au with SMTP for ; 11 May 2006 15:51:20 -0000 X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <44635D7F.9050805@eftel.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:51:27 +0800 From: Adrian Pavone User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Issue setting SSID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:51:24 -0000 Hey, I've got an RTL8180 that I have compiled a module for using ndisgen. The first time I installed FreeBSD, this worked fine, with exactly the same version of the driver, and I was able to use it, however, the computer power ran out during a portupgrade, rendering /usr unuseable. Now that I have reinstalled FreeBSD from scratch (wiping the partition and reinstalling from the same FreeBSD6.0-RELEASE cds), I have recompiled the module using ndisgen again, and kldload rtl8180_sys loads the module (with ndis and if_ndis loaded), without any errors output. An ifconfig shows ndis0, including the correct MAC Address. Now, when I try to set the ssid with ifconfig ndis0 ssid wingot (the name of my home network), and then run another ifconfig, ndis0 still has an SSID of only "". I have also reinstalled the system another time since, and the same issue is occuring. If anyone knows of a non-ndis version of this driver already available for FreeBSD (I know NetBSD has one), can they please point me in the correct direction, but otherwise, does anyone have any idea why the wireless device will not accept an SSID with ifconfig? No output is returned at any stage indicating any issues, and I have looked in /var/log and cannot find any problems logged. Any help would be greatly appreciated, Adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:54:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DC416A5AD for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:54:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2713B44196 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so215615nzf for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=bkRn/K8iMu+QOxqCjq4Hnl2zeAhTTCAg/byqKVDlyM4I1ZfObksrYsXQPiam287SGRQNn3EN68i5n3O3hwfVyNiVgLWbwCQePO0HL1hqgv/jJr8H9GjMQUnORhUcabbxyYz257TOuCjLTMrtZkRMX9oI2vk/VDgHQW12x9e9DqI= Received: by 10.65.160.11 with SMTP id m11mr562189qbo; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.107.14 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0028260605110826h13211353rbe374ccc5f5e7ce4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:26:04 +0100 From: "Jeff Rollin" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Kouji Ito , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:54:31 -0000 Are maintenance releases of old branches always released in step with new ones, or is it just coincidence that it's happening this way this time? On 11/05/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:47:07PM +0900, Kouji Ito wrote: > > Hello, > > I wait very much,too, but it is not readily released. > > If there is a detailed person for circumstances in > > 5.5-RELEASE situation, please teach it. > > Next week or so, now that 6.1 is out. > > Kris > > > --=20 ------------------------------------------------------ Argument against Linux number 6,033: "...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:54:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A6616A463 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wingot@eftel.com) Received: from tara2.wa.amnet.net.au (tara2.wa.amnet.net.au [203.161.126.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32EC4423E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:27:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wingot@eftel.com) Received: (qmail 18623 invoked by uid 89); 11 May 2006 15:27:07 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 18617, pid: 18618, t: 0.9349s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.88/m:36/d:1310 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tara2.wa.amnet.net.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (203.161.72.123) by tara2.wa.amnet.net.au with SMTP for ; 11 May 2006 15:27:06 -0000 X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <446357D0.6030008@eftel.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:27:12 +0800 From: Adrian Pavone User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Issue setting SSID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:54:58 -0000 Hey, I've got an RTL8180 that I have compiled a module for using ndisgen. The first time I installed FreeBSD, this worked fine, with exactly the same version of the driver, and I was able to use it, however, the computer power ran out during a portupgrade, rendering /usr unuseable. Now that I have reinstalled FreeBSD from scratch (wiping the partition and reinstalling from the same FreeBSD6.0-RELEASE cds), I have recompiled the module using ndisgen again, and kldload rtl8180_sys loads the module (with ndis and if_ndis loaded), without any errors output. An ifconfig shows ndis0, including the correct MAC Address. Now, when I try to set the ssid with ifconfig ndis0 ssid wingot (the name of my home network), and then run another ifconfig, ndis0 still has an SSID of only "". I have also reinstalled the system another time since, and the same issue is occuring. If anyone knows of a non-ndis version of this driver already available for FreeBSD (I know NetBSD has one), can they please point me in the correct direction, but otherwise, does anyone have any idea why the wireless device will not accept an SSID with ifconfig? No output is returned at any stage indicating any issues, and I have looked in /var/log and cannot find any problems logged. Any help would be greatly appreciated, Adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:55:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E365C16A649 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (malcolm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.206.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04148445D8 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4BFbKYO043471 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:37:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: (from mhunter@localhost) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3/Submit) id k4BFbKtY043470 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:37:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhunter) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:37:20 -0700 From: Mike Hunter To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (malcolm.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 May 2006 08:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: ftp install / base not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:55:34 -0000 Dear FreeBSD Questions, I have a not-so-new laptop that I tried to install FBSD on yesterday. This laptop can only be made to boot from floppies (usb boot doesn't work, no cdrom) and I happen to have some 5.3-RELEASE boot floppies laying around. I am successfully able to get into the installer, format the disk, create new FS's, DHCP, select the "Minimal" distribution and try the FTP install. But, no matter what I do, the ftp servers never have the distribution. I tried several, including ftp.freebsd.org. I have had this problem repeatedly over the years, always with older distributions. The error message says that I can go to the Options menu and change my distribution to "any", but that never works either. What's the story? Do older bases get removed from the ftp servers, or is there a different string I should be using in options (I tried 5.3-STABLE), or am I missing something? Please don't make me create new boot floopies! :) Signed, befuddled @ Berkeley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 16:03:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABE016A478 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:03:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A044E43D78 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:03:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 31629 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 02:03:23 +1000 Received: from 210-84-51-24.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (210.84.51.24) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 May 2006 02:03:23 +1000 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 02:03:19 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Alastair Rankine Message-ID: <20060512020319.329c95a7@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: <3655B84C-03FA-454B-A601-72DCEE8AE4E7@optusnet.com.au> <20060511105934.76e4dad7@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem corruption when drives are mirrored, but not otherwise X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:03:31 -0000 On Thu, 11 May 2006 21:59:49 +1000 Alastair Rankine wrote: > On 11/05/2006, at 10:59 AM, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 May 2006 22:45:10 +1000 > > Alastair Rankine wrote: > > > >> Disabling write > >> caching seems to have fixed the problem. > > > > excuse my ignorance, but where do you do this? BIOS? > > Set hw.ata.wc="0" in /boot/loader.conf > > See tuning(7) for more info. thx should have thought of this :) > > > I'm running GEOM mirrors on amd64 with SATA (I assume you mean PATA > > when you > > say ATA). > > Nope, I'm using SATA on a Promise FastTrak S150 TX2plus. > > What controller are you using? Software raid actually - the box has Nvidia RAID in the bios but didnt work (at all?) so ended up using gmirror in different layouts. A low end box :( The controllers are 2 x nVidia nForce CK804 SATA300. atapci1: port 0x1440-0x1447,0x1434-0x1437,0x1438-0x143f,0x1430-0x1433,0x1410-0x141f mem 0xdd002000-0xdd002fff irq 22 at device 7.0 on pci0 & atapci2: port 0x1458-0x145f,0x144c-0x144f,0x1450-0x1457,0x1448-0x144b,0x1420-0x142f mem 0xdd003000-0xdd003fff irq 23 at device 8.0 on pci0 Drives are 4 x WDC WD2500JS-00MHB0 02.01C03 > > Do you get a decent write speed? > > cstream -o tmpfile -v 1 -n 384m -i - > > ... is a good benchmark for sequential writes (cstream is in the ports). [numard@cerberus] [Fri May 12 01:56:24 2006] /tmp $ cstream -o tmpfile -v 1 -n 384m -i - 402653184 B 384.0 MB 6.91 s 58254333 B/s 55.56 MB/s definitely not great throughput, but it'll have to do for now :-( thanks a lot for the time to share your knowledge :) Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 16:08:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D87916A88B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shepherd@snowball.co.za) Received: from mailserver.snowballeffect.net (mailserver.snowballeffect.net [196.25.207.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C31143DA6 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:08:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shepherd@snowball.co.za) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:08:34 +0200 Message-ID: <8F10FEB80666B04480198F11A591A6B41771AC@fileserver.snowballeffect.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: "Cannot find file system superblock" error - how to recover? Thread-Index: AcZ1FSdScTX4MJQZQtCTCYLPZyHqJQ== From: To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: "Cannot find file system superblock" error - how to recover? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:08:42 -0000 Did you manage to solve the problem with the subject? =20 Just ha an almost similar problem and badly need your help?? =20 The filesytem is ext3 and have done almost everything. =20 Regards, Shepherd From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 16:09:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D586C16A48E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johan.h.nilsson@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC8043DA4 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:09:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johan.h.nilsson@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so235048nzi for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:09:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qwqLDCy81L4BobmnSU1lJCG6Jr4PsDPM2L+MJv6xlswPQdvmoTT1DXA70xZH1ZtBoYEwDaa8GzbPII4nEYNbg2njhazCyokiDFEoL5CCir3IOScnGWMmQRogY6IzAzTCyxEbnZ1aMfKClPUvnYCPK7ZEdbY2Ch02gUUmNhmahiU= Received: by 10.36.37.5 with SMTP id k5mr1260612nzk; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.132.7 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:09:47 +0200 From: "Johan Nilsson" To: "Mike Hunter" In-Reply-To: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp install / base not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:09:53 -0000 The lable doesn't exist on the mirrors anymore. Try either to get new installdisks or go into install parameters in sysinstall and change the lable to an existing one. Regards, Johan On 5/11/06, Mike Hunter wrote: > > Dear FreeBSD Questions, > > I have a not-so-new laptop that I tried to install FBSD on yesterday. > This laptop can only be made to boot from floppies (usb boot doesn't work= , > no cdrom) and I happen to have some 5.3-RELEASE boot floppies laying > around. > > I am successfully able to get into the installer, format the disk, create > new FS's, DHCP, select the "Minimal" distribution and try the FTP install= . > But, no matter what I do, the ftp servers never have the distribution. I > tried several, including ftp.freebsd.org. > > I have had this problem repeatedly over the years, always with older > distributions. The error message says that I can go to the Options menu > and change my distribution to "any", but that never works either. > > What's the story? Do older bases get removed from the ftp servers, or is > there a different string I should be using in options (I tried > 5.3-STABLE), or am I missing something? Please don't make me create new > boot floopies! :) > > Signed, > > befuddled @ Berkeley > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 16:20:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAB016A67F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kouji@cty-net.ne.jp) Received: from antivirus6.cynet.co.jp (antivirus6.cynet.co.jp [202.221.162.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E4043D6A for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kouji@cty-net.ne.jp) Received: from feed3.cynet.co.jp (feed3.cynet.co.jp [202.221.162.123]) by antivirus6.cynet.co.jp (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4BGKZCZ024789 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:20:35 +0900 Received: (qmail 16545 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 01:20:34 +0900 Received: from snat.cty-net.ne.jp (HELO mta4.cty-net.ne.jp) (210.149.120.135) by feed3.cynet.co.jp with SMTP; 12 May 2006 01:20:34 +0900 Received: (16893 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 01:20:34 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO [201.100.31.28]) ([210.128.78.33]) (envelope-sender ) by mta4.cty-net.ne.jp with SMTP for ; 12 May 2006 01:20:34 +0900 Message-ID: <4463645B.8020102@cty-net.ne.jp> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:20:43 +0900 From: Kouji Ito User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: ja, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:20:42 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Next week or so, now that 6.1 is out. > > Kris Good news for [me|us]!! Thank you very much. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 16:29:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B02016AA19 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A8343D81 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:29:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-95-215.51-151.net24.it [151.51.215.95]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4BGXAVl097906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:33:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4BGTP24037124; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:29:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4463666B.5030105@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:29:31 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NAOD TSIGHE , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:30:08 -0000 NAOD TSIGHE wrote: > Hi, > Is it possible to attach two monitors, 2keybord and 2 > mouse to one PC, by just buying some card that will > connect with a PC. AFAIK yes, at least theorically, but I never tried this myself. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 16:35:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F7816AB1E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E7043DA9 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FeE7v-0009ui-JI; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:35:07 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:34:57 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Jeff Rollin , Kris Kennaway Message-ID: Thread-Topic: when 5.5 Thread-Index: AcZ1GNbMFRgTquEMEdqUZAAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: <8a0028260605110826h13211353rbe374ccc5f5e7ce4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Kouji Ito , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:35:16 -0000 On 11/5/06 16:26, "Jeff Rollin" wrote: > Are maintenance releases of old branches always released in step with new > ones, or is it just coincidence that it's happening this way this time? It was planned this time as an experiment. The current feeling is that it has worked quite well. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 16:39:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C7C16A580 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CD343D5C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:39:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so181906uge for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:39:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SylcI4CjZWzZo1fUjTzQKBC4NbPJdoZjbAzxSyI6I8va0eONjpqMonW0bME1uisP8jtUbjgIs19yYYzsZN698s6LVRX2kiKqmXKDpecF7m6WRNt4iqhZq7xVJRtHtw0y3BhBapUqVQVmszgJg4YjQNJyjqRR4A+EG1c4+LrH7k8= Received: by 10.67.129.5 with SMTP id g5mr783505ugn; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.239.16 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ee9ca710605110932u1e9fa9e9wf2af3444c9a885ef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:32:43 -0400 From: "Andy Greenwood" To: "Andrea Venturoli" In-Reply-To: <4463666B.5030105@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> <4463666B.5030105@netfence.it> Cc: NAOD TSIGHE , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:39:54 -0000 Seems like the easiest thing to do would be to either get some serial consoles (or serial console emulators) or provide ssh access to the box. On 5/11/06, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > NAOD TSIGHE wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it possible to attach two monitors, 2keybord and 2 > > mouse to one PC, by just buying some card that will > > connect with a PC. > > AFAIK yes, at least theorically, but I never tried this myself. > > bye > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:08:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7E716A405 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2BC44259 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:08:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so168139wra for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:08:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=malxXlnnK7k7Co1OjW5nkjiSkpcEcp+GnTL9HQiCYCrBEYpiVY25JKfKJiZttYr/StKte3Uq2CQY57LRD7HzYsBg6ie0L33kH3STAShLPkyBGvpoUUIaekhSUYLF/D/g5LbqBjIbzopFFQ0mi0V2ucVxZP5skxSvF7oRWtDPInE= Received: by 10.54.121.18 with SMTP id t18mr131686wrc; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:08:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.23? ( [201.246.183.147]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 26sm1199642wrl.2006.05.11.10.08.36; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:08:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44636F88.7000107@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:08:24 -0400 From: Pablo Mora Hinojosa User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060511) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pablo Mora , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060511112429.273F4B81E@shodan.nognu.de> In-Reply-To: <20060511112429.273F4B81E@shodan.nognu.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: limit bandwidth 'make fetch' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:08:38 -0000 Frank Steinborn wrote: > Pablo Mora wrote: >> how i can limit bandwidth when i using 'make fetch' (make install in Ports)? >> >> thanks in advance. > > You could use the following in your make.conf to use wget (which is > capable of limiting bandwith) in your make.conf: > > FETCH_CMD=/usr/local/bin/wget --limit-rate=20k # Limits to 20k > DISABLE_SIZE=YES > > > DISABLE_SIZE is mandatory for wget, because it would get "-S the file to fetch>" otherwise, which is only supported by fetch. > > HTH, > Frank > Thanks Frank for your time. excellent tip! regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:11:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5435D16A4BF for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F5944272 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:11:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (danm@localhost.gushi.org [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4BHEJwk085120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:14:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4BHEIPl085092; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:14:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:14:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511131113.U81992@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: named/bind hangup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:11:08 -0000 Hey all, I have caching DNS servers running on two BSD 5.4 machines, and what happens on both of them is that the processes will just lock up, and while they may still answer some queries, they don't refresh or update, or respond to proper signals. For example: s2# sh /etc/rc.d/named stop Stopping named. Waiting for PIDS: 278, 278, 278, 278, 278, 278, 278, 278, 278, 278^C s2# kill -9 278 s2# sh /etc/rc.d/named start Starting named. They're running bind 9.3.1 -- I'm in the process of bumping one of my boxes up to FBSD 6.1 to run the latest and greatest named to see if this resolves things, but is this otherwise a known issue? The servers are authoritative for about 75 domains each, and only do recursive lookups for our network. Any ideas? If this was just on a single machine I'd scratch my head a bit less here. Please reply to me personally, I'm not on questions@. -Dan -- --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:17:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD7B16A43E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB98C440DD for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:55:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.171.127.191] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1FeERh-000Gd5-3j; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:55:25 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1147344670.4463171eb5364@196.22.132.16> References: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> <44621529.7050804@netfence.it> <20060511104517.GA11619@storage.mine.nu> <1147344670.4463171eb5364@196.22.132.16> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8EDB148D-8FC4-4CCB-9B1A-E6F686E14CEB@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:55:22 -0600 To: cknipe@savage.za.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.171.127.191 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Torn between SCSI and SATA for RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:17:36 -0000 On May 11, 2006, at 4:51 AM, cknipe@savage.za.org wrote: > Quoting lars : > >> I recently read an interesting comparison >> on consumer and enterprise grade harddisks: >> > http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/ > D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf > > > This was posted yesterday in responce to my question as well. That > document > deals mainly with the performance and reliability of the different > types of > hard drives (i.e. SATA vs SCSI). > > My questions that I'm posting is not really related towards the > performance of > the system, it's more towards the capacity of the system... I guess > it boils > down to the physical hardware... How does everything connect, how > to expand > systems, and how to run arrays bigger than what one single > controller can > provide... Look at the Areca SATA controllers. An 8 port RAID 6 SATA controller using 8 drives, 1 a hot spare, gives you about 5 drives worth of RAID 6 (5 + 2 parity = 7 drives, can suffer up to 2 simultaneous drive failures) and the Areca seem to be well regarded. I have an 8 port and a 12 port one but not in service yet. Areca has FBSD drivers. 5 drives * 500GB is a about 2.125 "real" TB (given that 500GB drive is not really 500 real GB) (calculation made with simple ratios and could be way off). The 12 port Areca card with 1 hot spare and RAID 6 would give you 9 * 500GB = about 3.825 real TB To get the size of array you want you need to go SATA as the SCSI drives aren't really big enough to get that big without getting into major major money. Use good, 24/7 rated SATA drives, not cheap maxtor or WD (think seagate or hitachi probably). Buy an extra drive to have or lose some capability and set up 2 hot spares. I am considering a machine with 2 12 port Areca cards set up with 2 RAID 6 arrays mirrored using ZFS under Solaris 10 as an nfs storage server... Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:17:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888DD16A61B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: from bigbird.whtech.com (bigbird.whtech.com [64.125.72.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CA1743F59 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:48:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: (qmail 11563 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2006 16:48:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mickey) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 11 May 2006 16:48:46 -0000 From: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:48:50 -0700 Message-ID: <03a501c6751a$c78bb860$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 thread-index: AcZ0mKUcvbPm6A7STk6j6vEQPJSG7Q== Subject: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right - More info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:18:04 -0000 Hi all... Ok... More info for the puzzle..... I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I do this: tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files of 0 length, rather than re-established as links. BUT When I just: tar -cf file.tar /source/* And then: tar -xf file.tar Then the symbolic links are made correctly.... Any reason why this should work and not the piped version for 'all in one' copying? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:21:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5948316A6C1 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob_27_preston@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7BBE43E64 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:20:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob_27_preston@yahoo.co.uk) Received: (qmail 81602 invoked by uid 60001); 11 May 2006 17:20:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KB4I0Eq87nlqexX/d5cCJ5G2laNDG7g2AH8/GhcugT+C4VZmJH8AzEijI/mkJ5RL7W9xepbzQ6RpOlIoWXfIAsj2lgy3K70UckE6rTqVbi3mYe1lOvYb2JCx0XF9yo9inF4ytMdT+nVaoDHzGdISoLPukRjyjaET4SvCnaKi+mQ= ; Message-ID: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [83.67.67.52] by web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:20:30 BST Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:20:30 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Davison To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: showing hidden files by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:21:05 -0000 I've been running 6.1 RC-1 for a couple of weeks with no problem. I've just installed a fresh copy of 6.1 roduction and when logging in as root am able to see (.)hidden files when running the 'ls' command. Is this normal, or is there something that I need to change to ensuer that the (.) files stay hidden unless i use ls -a ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! For Good - Sponsor a London Marathon runner - http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/charity/london-marathon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:31:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D246D16A485 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF4343D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:31:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7255813C7E5; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:34:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4C0CF13C7E3; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:34:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B8D13C404; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:34:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:34:41 -0500 (CDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Don O'Neil In-Reply-To: <03a501c6751a$c78bb860$0300020a@mickey> Message-ID: <20060511123100.C76077@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <03a501c6751a$c78bb860$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right - More info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:31:56 -0000 > Hi all... > > Ok... More info for the puzzle..... > > I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I do > this: > > tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) > > It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files of 0 > length, rather than re-established as links. > > BUT > > When I just: > > tar -cf file.tar /source/* > > And then: > > tar -xf file.tar > > Then the symbolic links are made correctly.... Any reason why this should > work and not the piped version for 'all in one' copying? If it's an actual filesystem why not use dump/restore? Otherwise I'm not sure, but you might also want to add in -pS to handle permissions and sparse files as well... -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:44:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D84E16A556 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B60143D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4BHif0V054565; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:44:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <44637804.6070501@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:44:36 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Davison References: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: showing hidden files by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:44:54 -0000 Robert Davison wrote: > I've been running 6.1 RC-1 for a couple of weeks with > no problem. I've just installed a fresh copy of 6.1 > roduction and when logging in as root am able to see > (.)hidden files when running the 'ls' command. Is this > normal, or is there something that I need to change to > ensuer that the (.) files stay hidden unless i use ls -a > > > It's normal. From ls(1): ---------------------------------------------------------- The following options are available: -A List all entries except for . and ... Automatically set for the super-user unless -I is specified. ---------------------------------------------------------- Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:44:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A2F16A57A for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3ED43D5C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:44:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 11204 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 17:44:54 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 May 2006 17:44:54 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4D3CF28425; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:44:53 -0400 (EDT) To: Robert Davison References: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:44:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (Robert Davison's message of "Thu, 11 May 2006 18:20:30 +0100 (BST)") Message-ID: <44mzdov4kq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: showing hidden files by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:44:55 -0000 Robert Davison writes: > I've been running 6.1 RC-1 for a couple of weeks with > no problem. I've just installed a fresh copy of 6.1 > roduction and when logging in as root am able to see > (.)hidden files when running the 'ls' command. Is this > normal, or is there something that I need to change to > ensuer that the (.) files stay hidden unless i use ls -a It's normal: see the entry for the "-A" option in the ls(1) manual. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:46:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FB316A61C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: from bigbird.whtech.com (bigbird.whtech.com [64.125.72.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9AC243D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:46:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: (qmail 91721 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2006 17:46:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mickey) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 11 May 2006 17:46:24 -0000 From: "Don O'Neil" To: "'Philip Hallstrom'" Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:46:29 -0700 Message-ID: <042e01c67522$d52fb810$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 thread-index: AcZ1Iapok5lyai6SRw6ubXQLYrEHNAAARQfA In-Reply-To: <20060511123100.C76077@bravo.pjkh.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right - More info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:46:32 -0000 Well... I'm moving it from one file system to another of different sizes, that's the main reason. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Philip Hallstrom Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:35 AM To: Don O'Neil Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right - More info > Hi all... > > Ok... More info for the puzzle..... > > I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I > do > this: > > tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) > > It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files of > 0 length, rather than re-established as links. > > BUT > > When I just: > > tar -cf file.tar /source/* > > And then: > > tar -xf file.tar > > Then the symbolic links are made correctly.... Any reason why this > should work and not the piped version for 'all in one' copying? If it's an actual filesystem why not use dump/restore? Otherwise I'm not sure, but you might also want to add in -pS to handle permissions and sparse files as well... -philip _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:47:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032DF16A458 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E13843D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:47:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FeFGB-00050o-WC by authid for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:47:36 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:47:35 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511174735.GC5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: showing hidden files by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:47:38 -0000 --nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 06:20:30PM +0100, Robert Davison wrote: > I've been running 6.1 RC-1 for a couple of weeks with > no problem. I've just installed a fresh copy of 6.1 > roduction and when logging in as root am able to see > (.)hidden files when running the 'ls' command. Is this > normal, or is there something that I need to change to > ensuer that the (.) files stay hidden unless i use ls -a This is the normal behaviour. To disable it, say `ls -I' (without the quotes). man ls for more tasty morsels! Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEY3i3ixf5fBYiFmoRAk6sAKCBqrchdacS0JKm3mSmZv8MCx6DJACeOxGP N+r/pfc/OWM/F/RmXPBUeB4= =AgaG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:48:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED3416A855 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A265943DE3 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:47:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id o37so243187nzf for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:47:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GMgsk/pOzKHUyaKJ23g31gpekh070EpJqDB1JvSP1+0vWMmcBtY/JJloI6+HeViimhmjay9Gl6zhsfHIIr1wz6CEGKxV01LPf6VMcyMU3M+dhQcFDm8iXRLJMCz2yC3U8X+fA8JudM+Uj+XRL9nifC2avnJc+WcQ7UfXNTxQHfw= Received: by 10.65.22.19 with SMTP id z19mr746246qbi; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:47:55 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: "Robert Davison" In-Reply-To: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: showing hidden files by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:48:03 -0000 On 5/11/06, Robert Davison wrote: > I've been running 6.1 RC-1 for a couple of weeks with > no problem. I've just installed a fresh copy of 6.1 > roduction and when logging in as root am able to see > (.)hidden files when running the 'ls' command. Is this > normal, or is there something that I need to change to > ensuer that the (.) files stay hidden unless i use ls -a > This is normal for root. But check the release notes, the "-I" switch was added to ls to suppress the default "-A" for root. --=20 -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:49:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B541D16A64F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:49:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net (pih-relay06.plus.net [212.159.14.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47A943D49 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:49:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=DESKTOP) by pih-relay06.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1FeFIJ-0000aZ-KY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:49:47 +0100 Message-ID: <000f01c67523$2b748700$0807a8c0@DESKTOP> From: "Graham Bentley" To: References: <20060511113734.53C5A16A4DC@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:48:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo (was ACPI / APM Question) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:49:52 -0000 Figure this may get more attention - LOL !!! Message: 6 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:31:50 +0100 From: "Graham Bentley" Subject: ACPI / APM Question To: Message-ID: <000501c674c4$968c7fc0$0807a8c0@DESKTOP> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I am running 6.0 on a little rackserver. Alot of the time its inactive and I was wondering about trying to setup ACPI the main reason being to spin down the disc / PSU so its a bit quieter (its in my office) I would require it to wake on LAN activity. How feasable is this and what steps do I need to take to set it up ? I am reading acpiconf man right now but I suspect more is required. I have set the BIOS to WOL, spin down disc after 15 mins and ACPI suspend type to S1. Just tested acpiconf -s 4 and it shuts the system down completely? Any help appreciated - Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:51:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705DA16A50F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2929B43D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:51:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039FF1A4E05; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:51:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CAD7D51589; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:51:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:51:35 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jeff Rollin Message-ID: <20060511175135.GA71742@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> <8a0028260605110826h13211353rbe374ccc5f5e7ce4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a0028260605110826h13211353rbe374ccc5f5e7ce4@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Kouji Ito , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:51:39 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote: > Are maintenance releases of old branches always released in step with new > ones, or is it just coincidence that it's happening this way this time? It was deliberate this time to avoid an extra ports freeze cycle, since that has very high cost and the benefit is really low since the intended audience for 5.5 is small and everyone who can do so will be much better off with the enormous benefits of 6. Kris --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEY3mnWry0BWjoQKURAlggAKDly9jNOyHXIB1Pyp9Ay0uLHnnx3wCgthbA lEZeBO2l3AEH/nEGnVtosr0= =NCXy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:51:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB6A16A508 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5640043D5D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:51:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 43420 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 18:12:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 11 May 2006 18:12:22 -0000 Message-ID: <44637997.6010503@123.com.sv> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:51:19 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: escape to console from xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:51:50 -0000 Hi, that is normal procedure to "escape" from xorg(fluxbox or kde) to a console?, i dont mean a xconsole, i mean a normal shell console, like if there is not xorg running thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:52:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4DC16A740 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0693043D5D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:52:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k4BHqVZL021504; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:52:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k4BHqVjR021503; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:52:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200605111752.k4BHqVjR021503@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: freebsd@philip.pjkh.com (Philip Hallstrom) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:52:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20060511123100.C76077@bravo.pjkh.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Don O'Neil , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:52:32 -0000 > > > Hi all... > > > > Ok... More info for the puzzle..... > > > > I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I do > > this: > > > > tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) > > > > It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files of 0 > > length, rather than re-established as links. > > > > BUT > > > > When I just: > > > > tar -cf file.tar /source/* > > > > And then: > > > > tar -xf file.tar > > > > Then the symbolic links are made correctly.... Any reason why this should > > work and not the piped version for 'all in one' copying? > > If it's an actual filesystem why not use dump/restore? Ditto on dump/restore. It is the clean and reliable way to do it. The complete filesystem will be recreated in the new location with all links, permission, etc intact. ////jerry > > Otherwise I'm not sure, but you might also want to add in -pS to handle > permissions and sparse files as well... > > -philip > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 17:54:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13E916A4F3 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E4F43D78 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:54:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4BHsFJx054640; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:54:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <44637A42.8030209@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:54:10 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Nicole References: <005a01c67498$a54a2a70$0300020a@mickey> <200605110227.k4B2RItS085960@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200605110227.k4B2RItS085960@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: don@lizardhill.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:54:42 -0000 Olivier Nicole wrote: >> I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I do >> this: > > I think that the way to go is: > > tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfvBp - ) > > Note the Bp at the end of the extract tar. > > olivier Is that for BSD tar, or gtar (GNU)? We still haven't decided which is offering the problem, and I don't find "-B" described in bsdtar(1), although I can see why you'd want it in gtar, perhaps. Nonetheless, the tests I made with both tars didn't seem to have this problem. Can Don confirm whether this only occurs if /source/ is a filesystem mount point? (Also, which tar are you using? KDK -- Computer programs expand so as to fill the core available. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 18:03:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC8016A53F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kbottner@barkinglizards.com) Received: from pluto.phpwebhosting.com (pluto.phpwebhosting.com [69.0.209.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1688843D6A for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:03:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kbottner@barkinglizards.com) Received: (qmail 1325 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 18:02:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Stile) (kbottner%barkinglizards.com@209.117.233.18) by pluto.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:02:55 -0400 From: "Keith Bottner" To: "'Robert Davison'" , Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:02:57 -0500 Organization: Barking Lizards Technologies Message-ID: <014801c67525$23113d90$0e01a8c0@Stile> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZ1H4RCgYMGjc2gQaKseJf1wED/gAABYfLw In-Reply-To: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: RE: showing hidden files by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:03:07 -0000 Just setup an alias in your shell login file for whatever options you want ls to use and be done with it. Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Robert Davison > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 12:21 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: showing hidden files by default > > I've been running 6.1 RC-1 for a couple of weeks with no > problem. I've just installed a fresh copy of 6.1 roduction > and when logging in as root am able to see (.)hidden files > when running the 'ls' command. Is this normal, or is there > something that I need to change to ensuer that the (.) files > stay hidden unless i use ls -a > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! For Good - Sponsor a London Marathon runner - > http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/charity/london-marathon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 18:28:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0128416A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cemasko@fibermail.hu) Received: from smtp.opticon.hu (smtp.bacs-net.hu [195.56.234.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C3004484C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:28:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cemasko@fibermail.hu) Received: (qmail 4131 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 18:28:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hollow.point.eu) (85.66.29.75) by smtp.opticon.hu with SMTP; 11 May 2006 18:28:27 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:28:14 +0200 From: Viktor Cemasko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511202814.6ab89e09@hollow.point.eu> In-Reply-To: <44637997.6010503@123.com.sv> References: <44637997.6010503@123.com.sv> Organization: Bogyotek Private Human Unit - Hangyaboy X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: escape to console from xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:28:19 -0000 On Thu, 11 May 2006 11:51:19 -0600 Miguel wrote: > Hi, that is normal procedure to "escape" from xorg(fluxbox or kde) to > a console?, i dont mean a xconsole, i mean a normal shell console, > like if there is not xorg running Press Ctrl+Alt+F1 buttons. -- Best regards, Cemasko Viktor. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 18:41:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C1D16A52D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reitz@eecs.cwru.edu) Received: from beta.eecs.cwru.edu (beta.EECS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.150.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0816D44872 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:40:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reitz@eecs.cwru.edu) Received: from bender ([::ffff:129.22.151.243]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,168bits,DES-CBC3-SHA) by beta.eecs.cwru.edu with esmtp; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:40:26 -0400 id 000ABE94.4463851A.00006C23 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:39:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Reitz X-X-Sender: reitz@bender To: Mike Hunter In-Reply-To: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: References: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp install / base not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:41:44 -0000 On Thu, 11 May 2006, Mike Hunter wrote: > Dear FreeBSD Questions, > > I have a not-so-new laptop that I tried to install FBSD on yesterday. > This laptop can only be made to boot from floppies (usb boot doesn't work, > no cdrom) and I happen to have some 5.3-RELEASE boot floppies laying > around. > > I am successfully able to get into the installer, format the disk, create > new FS's, DHCP, select the "Minimal" distribution and try the FTP install. > But, no matter what I do, the ftp servers never have the distribution. I > tried several, including ftp.freebsd.org. > > I have had this problem repeatedly over the years, always with older > distributions. The error message says that I can go to the Options menu > and change my distribution to "any", but that never works either. > > What's the story? Do older bases get removed from the ftp servers, or is > there a different string I should be using in options (I tried > 5.3-STABLE), or am I missing something? Please don't make me create new > boot floopies! :) Dear Befuddled, If you FTP to 'ftp.freebsd.org' and poke around, you'll find this directory listing in the '/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/' directory: ncftp .../FreeBSD/releases/i386 > dir drwxr-xr-x 19 110 0 1024 Apr 2 00:40 2.2.9-RELEASE lrwxr-xr-x 1 110 0 10 Nov 25 18:36 4.11 moved to ftp-archive -> README.TXT drwxrwxr-x 2 110 0 512 Apr 11 2005 5.0-CURRENT lrwxr-xr-x 1 110 0 10 Dec 19 18:36 5.3 has moved to ftp-archive -> README.TXT drwxrwxr-x 19 110 0 1024 May 9 2005 5.4-RELEASE drwxrwxr-x 19 110 0 1024 Feb 4 09:17 5.5-BETA1 drwxrwxr-x 19 110 0 1024 Mar 14 18:58 5.5-BETA4 drwxrwxr-x 13 110 0 512 Nov 4 2005 6.0-RELEASE drwxrwxr-x 13 110 0 1024 Feb 4 09:18 6.1-BETA1 drwxrwxr-x 14 110 0 1024 May 8 00:52 6.1-RELEASE drwxrwxr-x 8 110 0 512 Apr 1 07:50 ISO-IMAGES -rw-rw-r-- 1 110 0 637 Nov 23 19:21 README.TXT As you can see, they have a nice symlink which states that FreeBSD 5.3 has been moved to the 'ftp-archive'. Here is the relevant section from README.TXT: NOTE: Old releases are available at: ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/ And if you go and poke around on that server, you will find all of the bits for 5.3-RELEASE. HTH, -Andy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 18:43:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08FD16A624 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: from bigbird.whtech.com (bigbird.whtech.com [64.125.72.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91B5843E4E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:08:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: (qmail 23986 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2006 18:08:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mickey) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 11 May 2006 18:08:04 -0000 From: "Don O'Neil" To: "'Kevin Kinsey'" , "'Olivier Nicole'" Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:08:09 -0700 Message-ID: <049201c67525$dc159700$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 thread-index: AcZ1I/dN6VeOsxGMS9GpRy0ZhVGFjgAAN8Ug In-Reply-To: <44637A42.8030209@daleco.biz> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:43:48 -0000 I've tried both the BSD and GNU tars, I get the same results on both. It's very strange. When I add the B option, no different.... I used: tar cf - /array01/* | ( cd /mnt/disk01 && tar xfvBp - ) Maybe this is something specific to 4.11? Here's what happens: Source file: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 21 Feb 19 03:05 apache.log -> /var/shc/apache/logs/ Destination file created on the tar backup: ---------- 1 root wheel 0 May 11 11:02 apache.log Some have suggested using dump/restore. The problem with dump/restore is that I can't do it across the network and the file systems need to match. The whole point is to move these files/directories from one server to another to a volume with a LOT more space on a RAID array. -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Kinsey [mailto:kdk@daleco.biz] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:54 AM To: Olivier Nicole Cc: don@lizardhill.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. Olivier Nicole wrote: >> I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when >> I do >> this: > > I think that the way to go is: > > tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfvBp - ) > > Note the Bp at the end of the extract tar. > > olivier Is that for BSD tar, or gtar (GNU)? We still haven't decided which is offering the problem, and I don't find "-B" described in bsdtar(1), although I can see why you'd want it in gtar, perhaps. Nonetheless, the tests I made with both tars didn't seem to have this problem. Can Don confirm whether this only occurs if /source/ is a filesystem mount point? (Also, which tar are you using? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 18:44:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA56F16A695 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (9.67-18-64.networks.msdihosting.net [64.18.67.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C2644319 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:17:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([70.83.205.150]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id CLI20599 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:19:54 -0400 Message-Id: <7.0.0.16.2.20060511141310.06394960@msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.0.16 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:16:55 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ian Lord Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-DEBUG: 1 Subject: Windows Filemon equivalent for freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:44:42 -0000 Hi, Just a quick question, do you know a port that will do about the same thing as filemon for windows ? Basically, just a command line tool to list all access to disk showing 1- File being access 2- Success of failure 3- Process accessing the file Thanks a lot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 18:46:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470CF16A84C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AB24403B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:11:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-102-190.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.102.190]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 11 May 2006 14:12:09 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,116,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="202340445:sNHT29170486" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17507.32038.886501.850579@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:06:30 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44637804.6070501@daleco.biz> References: <20060511172030.81600.qmail@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <44637804.6070501@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta26) "endive" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Re: showing hidden files by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:46:06 -0000 I have this in the .cshrc for all the accounts I use: alias dir "ls -al \!* | more" Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 18:47:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE8016A907 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reitz@eecs.cwru.edu) Received: from beta.eecs.cwru.edu (beta.EECS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.150.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E477743F78 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reitz@eecs.cwru.edu) Received: from bender ([::ffff:129.22.151.243]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,168bits,DES-CBC3-SHA) by beta.eecs.cwru.edu with esmtp; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:45:14 -0400 id 000ABE90.4463863A.00006EE4 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:44:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Reitz X-X-Sender: reitz@bender To: NAOD TSIGHE In-Reply-To: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:47:34 -0000 On Thu, 11 May 2006, NAOD TSIGHE wrote: > Hi, > Is it possible to attach two monitors, 2keybord and 2 > mouse to one PC, by just buying some card that will > connect with a PC. > > I just want to know if it is possible for me to just > buy 1 more monitor, a mouse and a keyboard > so that two students could learn in one pc. and oppen > two different programes at the same time. Hi Naod, Check out this slashdot article: http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/03/1923255&tid=189 I remembered some discussion from a few years back, of some companies trying to make PCs that had 4 monitors/keyboards/mice for 1 CPU, for use in place that need super-cheap computers (i.e. Africa). I'm not sure what came of it, but the stuff that I've found so far was geared towards Linux. Good luck, -Andy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 18:48:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD62216AA56 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor.lundwall@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D057F43D66 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:48:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victor.lundwall@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so203540uge for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:48:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=azkevspvQhT4k8JkRjNKQdQxJeAnt4K6KghlUxVEl3dFAjNKVrz6oe2cHvmX4by6/r43NO6clXIdorvq9WXav2np8RmovPaDDDpC/44Yd7VsDV8ZJvCfWNaODWzlkRPMRiXxLfYOzM6BqnLAfttDePS35+7n8qqTc3BaaXrEK1I= Received: by 10.66.216.6 with SMTP id o6mr747220ugg; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.123.176? ( [81.231.5.105]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q1sm2263217uge.2006.05.11.11.48.35; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <446386F8.5050701@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:48:24 +0200 From: Victor Lundwall User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060414) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miguel References: <44637997.6010503@123.com.sv> In-Reply-To: <44637997.6010503@123.com.sv> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=95E040FC; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x95E040FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: escape to console from xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:49:03 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Miguel wrote: > Hi, that is normal procedure to "escape" from xorg(fluxbox or kde) to a > console?, i dont mean a xconsole, i mean a normal shell console, like if > there is not xorg running > thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'm not sure I understand your question but I think the answer to it is yes. You can switch trough ttys by pressing ctrl+Alt and any Fx-key between F1 and F8, F9 for X. Or you can shutdown X by pressing ctrl+alt+backspace. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEY4bhst+Hv5XgQPwRAu73AJ46GJL8XvAOkyYCVlOliE5v37W/pwCfUW8H 2f4baiIe703zu7r6yDvN7cE= =vw5c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 19:42:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1893216A4EA for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 19:42:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from corinth.polands.org (CPE-72-129-222-120.new.res.rr.com [72.129.222.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B042844938 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 19:40:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from email.polands.org (ammon.polands.org [172.16.1.7]) by corinth.polands.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4BJeExH019773 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:40:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from 209.103.215.99 (proxying for 209.103.215.99) (SquirrelMail authenticated user djp) by email.polands.org with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:40:14 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <63874.209.103.215.99.1147376414.squirrel@email.polands.org> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:40:14 -0500 (CDT) From: "Doug Poland" To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1458/Thu May 11 13:37:19 2006 on corinth.polands.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Bourne shell scripting resources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 19:43:12 -0000 Hello, Can someone point me to a good on-line reference for Bourne shell scripting? I've come across some syntax I don't understand and, since I don't understand it, don't know how to search the web for it. For example, what do these special variable characters do? ${UNISON_SCHED%% *} # what does %% * do? ${UNISON_JOB%\.*} # what does %\.* do? -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 19:46:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE4616A5E2 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 19:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB16446EC for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 19:35:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FeGwL-00074B-4Y by authid for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:35:13 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:35:12 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511193512.GD5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060511141310.06394960@msdi.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7.0.0.16.2.20060511141310.06394960@msdi.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Windows Filemon equivalent for freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 19:47:07 -0000 --mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:16:55PM -0400, Ian Lord wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Just a quick question, do you know a port that will do about the same=20 > thing as filemon for windows ? >=20 > Basically, just a command line tool to list all access to disk showing >=20 > 1- File being access > 2- Success of failure > 3- Process accessing the file >=20 > Thanks a lot fstat(1) is in the base system. lsof(8) is available in ports. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEY5Hwixf5fBYiFmoRAqC/AJ9TPdBHgFUTnzo83GnNnHfuD5hBzQCeKclt 108BJHG51JbalXRp116IaXg= =A0Hl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mJm6k4Vb/yFcL9ZU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 20:30:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B558116A47B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A49F44684 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 19:57:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FeHIE-0007VL-GN by authid for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:50 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:50 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511195750.GE5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: questions@freebsd.org References: <63874.209.103.215.99.1147376414.squirrel@email.polands.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63874.209.103.215.99.1147376414.squirrel@email.polands.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Subject: Re: Bourne shell scripting resources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:30:51 -0000 --10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:40:14PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Can someone point me to a good on-line reference for Bourne shell > scripting? I've come across some syntax I don't understand and, since > I don't understand it, don't know how to search the web for it. >=20 > For example, what do these special variable characters do? >=20 > ${UNISON_SCHED%% *} # what does %% * do? > ${UNISON_JOB%\.*} # what does %\.* do? The man page is a good start ;-) Here's what is has to say about your questions: ${parameter%word} Remove Smallest Suffix Pattern. The word is expanded to produce a pattern. The parameter expansion then results in parameter, with the smallest portion of the suffix matched by the pattern deleted. ${parameter%%word} Remove Largest Suffix Pattern. The word is expanded to produce a pattern. The parameter expansion then results in parameter, with the largest portion of the suffix matched by the pattern deleted. In the second case, '\.*' is a shell file glob pattern. You might also find this site interesting/useful: http://www.shelldorado.com/ HTH Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEY5c+ixf5fBYiFmoRAsh8AKCLSRnWEzwjs8Ft8eeN7djIC8KeYQCdEpnL jVYZ9Y/gauyV66glslr/51o= =GUrZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --10jrOL3x2xqLmOsH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 20:30:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACFC16A5DA for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bds@waywood.co.uk) Received: from lon-mail-4.gradwell.net (lon-mail-4.gradwell.net [193.111.201.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD9F44795 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:03:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bds@waywood.co.uk) Received: from [84.12.167.94] ([84.12.167.94] helo=[192.168.1.4] country=GB ident=bds#pop3&waywood&co&uk) by lon-mail-4.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.217) id 44639876.9b29.73 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:03:02 +0100 (envelope-sender ) Message-ID: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:02:29 +0100 From: Barnaby Scott User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:30:56 -0000 I have mangaged to install version 6.0 and have had a bit of a play, but not before re-installing because the boot had been sooooo slow, I thought I must have mucked it up! However it was just a slow point in the boot sequence - but one which I still can't believe is normal. The boot sequence all goes smoothly, telling me all sorts of things I never thought I'd need to know, and frankly don't understand, until it gets to the following line: Configuring syscons: keymap blanktime screensaver. and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5 minutes every time. Can this be normal? If not, what do I do? (Words of one syllable only please!) Thanks Barnaby Scott PS I am conscious that I don't really know the etiquette around here too well (apart from not mentioning the logo!) - I don't want to clutter the list with messages of thanks when help is given, but at the same time I don't want to seem ungrateful - which is right? (Thanks by the way to all who helped me with my last question about interacting with a headless Windows box.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 20:30:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CAB16A632 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E7543F14 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 19:26:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68DC13C7E6; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:28:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 79CF813C7E5; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:28:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774E313C404; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:28:51 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:28:51 -0500 (CDT) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Don O'Neil In-Reply-To: <042e01c67522$d52fb810$0300020a@mickey> Message-ID: <20060511142755.M89614@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <042e01c67522$d52fb810$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right - More info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:31:14 -0000 > Well... I'm moving it from one file system to another of different sizes, > that's the main reason. Dump won't care about that... dd would, but dd isn't right for this anyway... I'd give dump a try. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Philip Hallstrom > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:35 AM > To: Don O'Neil > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right > - More info > >> Hi all... >> >> Ok... More info for the puzzle..... >> >> I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I >> do >> this: >> >> tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) >> >> It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files of >> 0 length, rather than re-established as links. >> >> BUT >> >> When I just: >> >> tar -cf file.tar /source/* >> >> And then: >> >> tar -xf file.tar >> >> Then the symbolic links are made correctly.... Any reason why this >> should work and not the piped version for 'all in one' copying? > > If it's an actual filesystem why not use dump/restore? > > Otherwise I'm not sure, but you might also want to add in -pS to handle > permissions and sparse files as well... > > -philip > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 20:31:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D326016A6D3 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA5F447E5 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k4BK4AfV021805; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:04:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k4BK4AAr021804; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:04:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200605112004.k4BK4AAr021804@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: don@lizardhill.com (Don O'Neil) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:04:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <049201c67525$dc159700$0300020a@mickey> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:31:32 -0000 > > I've tried both the BSD and GNU tars, I get the same results on both. It's > very strange. > > When I add the B option, no different.... I used: > > tar cf - /array01/* | ( cd /mnt/disk01 && tar xfvBp - ) > > Maybe this is something specific to 4.11? > > Here's what happens: > > Source file: > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 21 Feb 19 03:05 apache.log -> > /var/shc/apache/logs/ > > Destination file created on the tar backup: > > ---------- 1 root wheel 0 May 11 11:02 apache.log > > Some have suggested using dump/restore. The problem with dump/restore is > that I can't do it across the network and the file systems need to match. > The whole point is to move these files/directories from one server to > another to a volume with a LOT more space on a RAID array. I used to do it over the net regularly with dump/restore. Just take advantage of the pipe ability. Since the other system has so much room, just pipe the dump file over there and unroll it with restore on the other machine as you please or just leave it in a dump file if you don't want. ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 20:33:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972BE16A52C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:33:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2107543D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:32:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so282398nzf for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:32:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=K5d35aDJOUNgTH0WD39VUrmaGXY9jFMi3lzkLDfavez4+QaMjkEsCuzAVeEWCI4u7Wwd+Rxbq4/Ay1P87QsqN0oFX3oc+Lza+P8UCdDldvAayU1qkNHXEaOPja1kJnZaRxtrbuVF/LPH5pUXjA/v4M+LqYa1mut9DhmII+flGvg= Received: by 10.64.184.7 with SMTP id h7mr946613qbf; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:32:34 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: "Doug Poland" In-Reply-To: <63874.209.103.215.99.1147376414.squirrel@email.polands.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <63874.209.103.215.99.1147376414.squirrel@email.polands.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bourne shell scripting resources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:33:17 -0000 On 5/11/06, Doug Poland wrote: > Hello, > > Can someone point me to a good on-line reference for Bourne shell > scripting? I've come across some syntax I don't understand and, since > I don't understand it, don't know how to search the web for it. I found these in my bookmarks... http://www.linuxselfhelp.com/gnu/bash/html_chapter/bashref_toc.html http://steve-parker.org/sh/sh1.shtml Mostly I use "Unix Shells by Example" by Ellie Quigley. > For example, what do these special variable characters do? > > ${UNISON_SCHED%% *} # what does %% * do? > ${UNISON_JOB%\.*} # what does %\.* do? > > > -- > Regards, > Doug > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 20:40:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2766916A507 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johan.h.nilsson@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383AA43D5D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johan.h.nilsson@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so30385nzi for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=oMPuWExc122SPA+saY3U7epqaQzKf0RGEHvkl5D0fEYtYZR3Gq1/ZhX/n2jPOKQNBXYToaP1SpZqmpPj4qtKqS23/AjeQqWedjJP7GndWcUKwBgLzMve3wXsc3OB9AQbZVNuQnRVoa2p+Ijb/OwuESjwjW7jL8vtg5labsbkYGw= Received: by 10.36.177.6 with SMTP id z6mr1556165nze; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.132.7 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:40:11 +0200 From: "Johan Nilsson" To: "Andy Reitz" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp install / base not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:40:13 -0000 But can you do a ftp-install from an archived version? If, how? Regards, Johan On 5/11/06, Andy Reitz wrote: > > On Thu, 11 May 2006, Mike Hunter wrote: > > > Dear FreeBSD Questions, > > > > I have a not-so-new laptop that I tried to install FBSD on yesterday. > > This laptop can only be made to boot from floppies (usb boot doesn't > work, > > no cdrom) and I happen to have some 5.3-RELEASE boot floppies laying > > around. > > > > I am successfully able to get into the installer, format the disk, > create > > new FS's, DHCP, select the "Minimal" distribution and try the FTP > install. > > But, no matter what I do, the ftp servers never have the > distribution. I > > tried several, including ftp.freebsd.org. > > > > I have had this problem repeatedly over the years, always with older > > distributions. The error message says that I can go to the Options men= u > > and change my distribution to "any", but that never works either. > > > > What's the story? Do older bases get removed from the ftp servers, or > is > > there a different string I should be using in options (I tried > > 5.3-STABLE), or am I missing something? Please don't make me create ne= w > > boot floopies! :) > > Dear Befuddled, > > If you FTP to 'ftp.freebsd.org' and poke around, you'll find this > directory listing in the '/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/' directory: > > ncftp .../FreeBSD/releases/i386 > dir > drwxr-xr-x 19 110 0 1024 Apr 2 00:40 2.2.9-RELEASE > lrwxr-xr-x 1 110 0 10 Nov 25 18:36 4.11 moved to > ftp-archive -> README.TXT > drwxrwxr-x 2 110 0 512 Apr 11 2005 5.0-CURRENT > lrwxr-xr-x 1 110 0 10 Dec 19 18:36 5.3 has moved to > ftp-archive -> README.TXT > drwxrwxr-x 19 110 0 1024 May 9 2005 5.4-RELEASE > drwxrwxr-x 19 110 0 1024 Feb 4 09:17 5.5-BETA1 > drwxrwxr-x 19 110 0 1024 Mar 14 18:58 5.5-BETA4 > drwxrwxr-x 13 110 0 512 Nov 4 2005 6.0-RELEASE > drwxrwxr-x 13 110 0 1024 Feb 4 09:18 6.1-BETA1 > drwxrwxr-x 14 110 0 1024 May 8 00:52 6.1-RELEASE > drwxrwxr-x 8 110 0 512 Apr 1 07:50 ISO-IMAGES > -rw-rw-r-- 1 110 0 637 Nov 23 19:21 README.TXT > > As you can see, they have a nice symlink which states that FreeBSD 5.3 ha= s > been moved to the 'ftp-archive'. Here is the relevant section from > README.TXT: > > NOTE: Old releases are available at: > > ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/ > > And if you go and poke around on that server, you will find all of the > bits for 5.3-RELEASE. > > HTH, > -Andy. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 20:40:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906EB16A430 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:40:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: from bigbird.whtech.com (bigbird.whtech.com [64.125.72.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51C8043D5D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:40:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: (qmail 1390 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2006 20:40:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mickey) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 11 May 2006 20:40:27 -0000 From: "Don O'Neil" To: "'Philip Hallstrom'" Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:33 -0700 Message-ID: <019901c6753b$268c0a70$0300020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 thread-index: AcZ1Ov4zZwaD44XpRBq0UTt1oFP6mQAABg8A X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: <20060511142755.M89614@bravo.pjkh.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right - More info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:40:35 -0000 I will... Thanks to all for helping... Still weird what's happening though! -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Philip Hallstrom Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 12:29 PM To: Don O'Neil Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied right - More info > Well... I'm moving it from one file system to another of different > sizes, that's the main reason. Dump won't care about that... dd would, but dd isn't right for this anyway... I'd give dump a try. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Philip > Hallstrom > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:35 AM > To: Don O'Neil > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Copying a file system w/ tar - symbolic links not copied > right > - More info > >> Hi all... >> >> Ok... More info for the puzzle..... >> >> I'm trying to move a file system from one disk to another, and when I >> do >> this: >> >> tar cf - /source/* | ( cd /destination && tar xfv - ) >> >> It copies all the files, but the symbolic links are copied as files >> of 0 length, rather than re-established as links. >> >> BUT >> >> When I just: >> >> tar -cf file.tar /source/* >> >> And then: >> >> tar -xf file.tar >> >> Then the symbolic links are made correctly.... Any reason why this >> should work and not the piped version for 'all in one' copying? > > If it's an actual filesystem why not use dump/restore? > > Otherwise I'm not sure, but you might also want to add in -pS to > handle permissions and sparse files as well... > > -philip > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 20:50:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B69016A4A1 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rprajapa@yahoo.com) Received: from web81001.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81001.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6734B43D76 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:50:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rprajapa@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 36831 invoked by uid 60001); 11 May 2006 20:50:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=uw/KVsuzda+N4ZAYsFJbGpEAeNzFZIlM+1c5yYe534u74Hu80b9WL5ofUButPE+Mq+iHyx0ilJeP6WHNPcjnntuMwWg7gk9r0WJUI2EeDWPfQ2XU+wFgfzST14zaGh+lWKFCkVXz8dnBd2xH3/0caP7jm1TujMa7xXw2qhQBBBU= ; Message-ID: <20060511205037.36829.qmail@web81001.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.152.20.33] by web81001.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:50:37 PDT Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:50:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Rakesh Prajapati To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <0740B9A6C3639441850D84E94767945C036BDA@DMM00038.link2.gpn.gov.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD Subject: RE: ASUS WL-167G config (was ural driver, Belkin F5D7050 USB not working)... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:50:57 -0000 FYI My Asus WL-167G wireless adapter works out of the box without any settings when I installed FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE. The installer recognized it and I was able to configure it through DHCP effortlessly. Maybe it would have worked in 6.0 If I did a fresh install or tried sysinstall. FreeBSD 6.1 ROCKS!!!! Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote: >Thanks for the reply. > >I bought the same Asus WL-167G recently looking at other posts on the internet but I am >unable to get it work. > >It shows up in ifconfig and then when I try to connect to the router it simply does not >work. >I run the following command > >ifconfig ural0 inet 192.168.0.20 netmask 0xffffff00 ssid DRAGON (my ssid)ifconfig -a shows as "NO CARRIER" but once it showed as "associated" buteven then it did not work (i >tried accessesing the net).My router is not configured for Encryption or anything. I >control securityby the Mac Address of the wireless device.IF you have a step by step >instructions on how to make it work that will be great.I havent spent a whole lot of time >trying to make it work either, so if you have theinstructions handy then its good or >else I will keep trying, shouldnt be > thatdifficult.Thanks,Rakesh Rakesh, You may have this sorted by now, but just in case... The good news is that you have the ural0 device, so now it's just a matter of configuration. Without encryption the only other thing I needed to specify to ifconfig was the channel (check the settings on your router for the channel number): eg. ifconfig ural0 inet 192.168.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid DRAGON channel 1 and I was on the network. If that doesn't work, check the settings on your router - have you added the MAC address to the filter list, and are you sure WEP/WPA is turned off, are you in range of the router? Take a look at this article for info on wireless setup: http://www.freebsdmall.com/~loader/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/wireless/article.html Let me know how you get on. By the way, most people would probably prefer you not to email in HTML - you're likely to get a quicker (or any) response if you don't - and copy the list into your replies. Peter Harrison. ********************************************************************** This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department for Work and Pensions. If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us and then permanently delete what you have received. Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance with our policy on the use of electronic communications. ********************************************************************** The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus-free. (__) (++)-----i\ ~~| BSD | * |_|~|_| If you understand what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -A. L. --------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 21:21:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7137816A407 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:21:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BE84468B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:21:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuaregmex@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so373918pye for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZCFPUv9JN4FMkibbVbnMBV+SVzXwe/pCMqXH0te2ZUfagO8HaP7sTU2nbSHBPP7CUMtBwJQ6sQXd/PLwJoSsxamZLZ6IuZr17ln3p4UB8SbR9cfbYcL5edjShUpWciz1PtWvmWdwadS2ftV5AGda2oOzloq736ZCoZUaIzQzkDI= Received: by 10.35.112.3 with SMTP id p3mr1686254pym; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.114.9 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7a4a15bd0605111421rd0f1ad8r52d0fb4c1d0be799@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:21:04 -0500 From: Tuareg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Enable plugin nppdf.so in firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:21:06 -0000 Hello... I'm having this problem with Firefox 1.5.0.2 / Mozilla 1.7.13 I check that the links it's correct and also reinstalled linuxpluginwrapper and copied libmap.conf to /etc. But when I try to see a pdf file with both browsers launched from command line, I just get this message: bash2-2.05b$ firefox Usage: gv [OPTION]... [FILE] PostScript and PDF viewer. --monochrome display document using only black and white --grayscale display document without colors --color display document as usual --safer start ghostscript in safe mode --nosafer do not start ghostscript in safe mode --quiet start ghostscript with the -dQUIET option --noquiet do not start ghostscript with the -dQUIET option --arguments=3DARGS start ghostscript with additional options as specified by the string ARGS --page=3DLABEL display the page with label LABEL first --center the page should be centered automatically --nocenter the page should not be centered automatically --media=3DMEDIA selects the paper size to be used --orientation=3DORIENTATION sets the orientation of the page --scale=3DN selects the scale N --scalebase=3DN selects the scale base N --swap interchange the meaning of the orientations landscape and seascape --noswap do not interchange the meaning of the orientation landscape and seascape --antialias use antialiasing --noantialias do not use antialiasing --dsc dsc comments are respected --nodsc dsc comments are not respected --eof ignore the postscript EOF comment while scanning documents --noeof do not ignore the postscript EOF comment while scanning documents --pixmap use backing pixmap --nopixmap do not use backing pixmap --watch watch the document file for changes --nowatch do not watch the document file for changes --help print a help message and exit --usage print a usage message and exit --resize fit the size of the window to the size of the page --noresize do not fit the size of the window to the size of the page -geometry [][x][{+-}{+-}] --ad=3DFILE read and use additional resources from FILE --style=3DFILE read and use additional resources from FILE. These resources have lower priority than those provided on the context of --ad --spartan shortcut for --style=3Dgv_spartan.dat --version show gv version and exit And the browsers don't do anything else... I have reinstalled Mozilla and got the same result.... maybe need to reinstall linuxwrapper/plugger/mozilla/firefox in certain order to fix this= ? On 5/9/06, Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > > # cd /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > # make all install clean > # cp /usr/local/share/examples/linuxpluginwrapper/libmap.conf-FreeBSD6 > /etc/libmap.conf > > restart your firefox and open "about:plugins" url to see your installed > plugins > > > On 5/8/06, cblasius wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I've a problem with plugin to view PDF file in firefox. Could someone > > help me? > > > > Wehen I run firefox from command line I obtain this message: > > > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > > /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so > > [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined > > symbol "XtCalloc"] > > > > Best regards, > > cblasius > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 21:26:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4188C16A403 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:26:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973754468B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:26:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 70175 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 21:47:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 11 May 2006 21:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <4463ABE6.5080505@123.com.sv> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:25:58 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Lundwall References: <44637997.6010503@123.com.sv> <446386F8.5050701@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <446386F8.5050701@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: escape to console from xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:26:29 -0000 Victor Lundwall wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Miguel wrote: > > >>Hi, that is normal procedure to "escape" from xorg(fluxbox or kde) to a >>console?, i dont mean a xconsole, i mean a normal shell console, like if >>there is not xorg running >>thanks >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >I'm not sure I understand your question but I think the answer to it is >yes. You can switch trough ttys by pressing ctrl+Alt and any Fx-key >between F1 and F8, F9 for X. Or you can shutdown X by pressing >ctrl+alt+backspace. > that is exactly what i was looking for, thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 21:35:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D93C16A400 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from genoa.webtent.org (static-70-110-70-42.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [70.110.70.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F6F44634 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:35:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from columbus.webtent.org (columbus.webtent.org [192.168.1.25]) by genoa.webtent.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6378A029 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:35:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:35:19 -0400 Message-Id: <1147383319.15954.75.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Advice on RAID? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:35:21 -0000 I have looked into and tried FreeBSD 6.0 Vinum and GEOM RAID in our PIII SCSI 80-pin server with the help of several here on the list. I'm pretty much going to use GEOM RAID-1 for the system disks using Ralf's doc. I have room for 3 more disks. Would you recommend using Vinum RAID-5 on three 73GB drives or using GEOM RAID-1 again on 2 147GB drives? If there is no big reason to use either over the other, we've decided to go for the most space and RAID-5. But the amount of space we would be gaining is probably less than 50GB, correct? Or do you have another solution on our $700 budget. It is a debate here and would like to get experienced insight. Thanks in advance for your time! -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 21:37:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E562816A5C4 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reitz@eecs.cwru.edu) Received: from beta.eecs.cwru.edu (beta.EECS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.150.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E0F44084 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:07:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reitz@eecs.cwru.edu) Received: from bender ([::ffff:129.22.151.243]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,168bits,DES-CBC3-SHA) by beta.eecs.cwru.edu with esmtp; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:07:05 -0400 id 000ABE80.4463A779.00001697 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:06:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Reitz X-X-Sender: reitz@bender To: Johan Nilsson In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp install / base not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:37:43 -0000 On Thu, 11 May 2006, Johan Nilsson wrote: > But can you do a ftp-install from an archived version? If, how? Johan, While I have never tried this, sysinstall appears to support entering non-standard FTP URLs. After you choose the FTP option, you can choose the FTP server. The second option in this list is 'URL', which allows you to type in any FTP site -- and as I presume, the ftp-archive site will work if entered here. -Andy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 21:37:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9290F16A5EE for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583EA444E4 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:12:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.16.2.1] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [172.16.2.1]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0422E024 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4463A8BD.2060306@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:12:29 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpayBOw7hyZ2FhcmQ=?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms090506010303080800000408" Cc: Subject: Restricting root access to ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:37:51 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms090506010303080800000408 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi: How do I restrict root/administrative access to my ldap (openldap 2.3) directory? I want to allow root connection only from localhost or a list of authorized hosts, while allowing other users to connect from anywhere. Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 --------------ms090506010303080800000408 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIL5jCC Be8wggPXoAMCAQICCQCNA1Uf/OBPDDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCBmTELMAkGA1UEBhMCRVMx GDAWBgNVBAoTD0RhZW1vbiBTZWN1cml0eTEeMBwGA1UECxMVQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9y aXR5MR4wHAYDVQQDExVDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdHkxJDAiBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWFWNh QGRhZW1vbnNlY3VyaXR5LmNvbTEKMAgGA1UEBRMBMDAeFw0wNjA0MjAxMzE2NTBaFw0wNzA0 MjAxMzE2NTBaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkVTMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxMb2NvTG9tby5PcmcxFjAUBgNV BAMTDUVyaWsgTm9yZ2FhcmQxJDAiBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWFW5vcmdhYXJkQGxvY29sb21vLm9y ZzCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMPmPk5QnkyvR4ZNS/jYCYEk6/x/ mqSIqM7XXmikYX4AmbS4AbgJg7tY150ti87oYIjH4pnt1ReYWV4P2lDE2w0Db73Fk3TGpYcq XNUu4uRl8eoMX6Mh5I34tzJc+ZJqXW0pQtzP7JDgPvLddh0roY/ongaqpnrA6dDh0QfEC+ky z1abx9xmp776RPfRnbzjUht9VGPohiZFLyNfLgw5x4Q5/efDtx3tKDMJP67UnVd1tbclKbOs +HaqxYXNr1TJ9HIpRpfb4IhBFCvBDiiHUjbGtpi2EXeHuwoQ8cp7mjl6j1BfGaoFHvqzA1GD +156qJ9waxEvx/0XGudqWJeFTVkCAwEAAaOCAW4wggFqMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMCAQAwCwYD VR0PBAQDAgO4MB0GA1UdDgQWBBRpebgs44/nvl3Dw7F0Yrg/nx9puTCBzgYDVR0jBIHGMIHD gBSOYakm6rz5V4h0qO3QlbBuYT3ipaGBn6SBnDCBmTELMAkGA1UEBhMCRVMxGDAWBgNVBAoT D0RhZW1vbiBTZWN1cml0eTEeMBwGA1UECxMVQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXR5MR4wHAYD VQQDExVDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdHkxJDAiBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWFWNhQGRhZW1vbnNl Y3VyaXR5LmNvbTEKMAgGA1UEBRMBMIIJAI0DVR/84E8BMCAGA1UdEQQZMBeBFW5vcmdhYXJk QGxvY29sb21vLm9yZzA4BgNVHR8EMTAvMC2gK6AphidodHRwOi8vd3d3LmRhZW1vbnNlY3Vy aXR5LmNvbS9jYS9kcy5jcmwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggIBAMefA0DXBeUmPG353ldj4jQP TKusU49AGPtH0gI0W7gnc8L6NQb7/lzpF1xW3fVOXmDBSQrSzdsmPoUiQBOv8/GTPiJbktbr eHGPDDi7xTmNgGCh/gv9EECEc0casKs778FMhJxQDIKUrBpdxpxUVHxzR9m2MgCaiOPi0oru o5ZjdNh4PyfSrYkkMJmp9w7ouulyf7wSOwwyIxZixWHVIo0lJBZCFQqIcCXzmnLUhlUKqMGb 0sOsPh7GITecrfGAM8iBpLuRjGe3yDa8Xx2riflJLjKxqcSg0OIhibS3xkGTgoJhtAJBB21G CkcnHmLXmnXYZvfE/D4twmSGo3j4D79xFA5xMJU5IwNYT+agU2srRq11eZvtVK3p2sF2rgSK 99cbCHL0K3AhhiF9z+1uLjZO8UgnvB81rQG+Kzn/nvZgQ1bvxKnrtzs3UuKPyAXflNVSiMwO vUv04tBJcIGrdiav64BTQFBgguY7JWWkrsaTeEMUHXW6aUyGCfngQ2LR6McfDeZZLM0BKXiv pjozutGTR76khWqSsttSZQoGoNbMRcHodFCZ2RHSsM1rPKINY1w7vTnr8oEVD3D+pY1UrM/o vDkvS8ypr+gg66pMC0gXl7cReoFNiE118sHKlAEGKNlka3Pga2r+AL6KrjwCZHMwOFDheFoN k9rxTruKV0O0MIIF7zCCA9egAwIBAgIJAI0DVR/84E8MMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIGZMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJFUzEYMBYGA1UEChMPRGFlbW9uIFNlY3VyaXR5MR4wHAYDVQQLExVDZXJ0aWZp Y2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAMTFUNlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0eTEkMCIGCSqG SIb3DQEJARYVY2FAZGFlbW9uc2VjdXJpdHkuY29tMQowCAYDVQQFEwEwMB4XDTA2MDQyMDEz MTY1MFoXDTA3MDQyMDEzMTY1MFowYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCRVMxFTATBgNVBAoTDExvY29Mb21v Lk9yZzEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRXJpayBOb3JnYWFyZDEkMCIGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYVbm9yZ2FhcmRA bG9jb2xvbW8ub3JnMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAw+Y+TlCeTK9H hk1L+NgJgSTr/H+apIioztdeaKRhfgCZtLgBuAmDu1jXnS2LzuhgiMfime3VF5hZXg/aUMTb DQNvvcWTdMalhypc1S7i5GXx6gxfoyHkjfi3Mlz5kmpdbSlC3M/skOA+8t12HSuhj+ieBqqm esDp0OHRB8QL6TLPVpvH3GanvvpE99GdvONSG31UY+iGJkUvI18uDDnHhDn958O3He0oMwk/ rtSdV3W1tyUps6z4dqrFhc2vVMn0cilGl9vgiEEUK8EOKIdSNsa2mLYRd4e7ChDxynuaOXqP UF8ZqgUe+rMDUYP7Xnqon3BrES/H/Rca52pYl4VNWQIDAQABo4IBbjCCAWowDwYDVR0TAQH/ BAUwAwIBADALBgNVHQ8EBAMCA7gwHQYDVR0OBBYEFGl5uCzjj+e+XcPDsXRiuD+fH2m5MIHO BgNVHSMEgcYwgcOAFI5hqSbqvPlXiHSo7dCVsG5hPeKloYGfpIGcMIGZMQswCQYDVQQGEwJF UzEYMBYGA1UEChMPRGFlbW9uIFNlY3VyaXR5MR4wHAYDVQQLExVDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRo b3JpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAMTFUNlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0eTEkMCIGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYV Y2FAZGFlbW9uc2VjdXJpdHkuY29tMQowCAYDVQQFEwEwggkAjQNVH/zgTwEwIAYDVR0RBBkw F4EVbm9yZ2FhcmRAbG9jb2xvbW8ub3JnMDgGA1UdHwQxMC8wLaAroCmGJ2h0dHA6Ly93d3cu ZGFlbW9uc2VjdXJpdHkuY29tL2NhL2RzLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAgEAx58DQNcF 5SY8bfneV2PiNA9Mq6xTj0AY+0fSAjRbuCdzwvo1Bvv+XOkXXFbd9U5eYMFJCtLN2yY+hSJA E6/z8ZM+IluS1ut4cY8MOLvFOY2AYKH+C/0QQIRzRxqwqzvvwUyEnFAMgpSsGl3GnFRUfHNH 2bYyAJqI4+LSiu6jlmN02Hg/J9KtiSQwman3Dui66XJ/vBI7DDIjFmLFYdUijSUkFkIVCohw JfOactSGVQqowZvSw6w+HsYhN5yt8YAzyIGku5GMZ7fINrxfHauJ+UkuMrGpxKDQ4iGJtLfG QZOCgmG0AkEHbUYKRyceYteaddhm98T8Pi3CZIajePgPv3EUDnEwlTkjA1hP5qBTaytGrXV5 m+1UrenawXauBIr31xsIcvQrcCGGIX3P7W4uNk7xSCe8HzWtAb4rOf+e9mBDVu/Eqeu3OzdS 4o/IBd+U1VKIzA69S/Ti0Elwgat2Jq/rgFNAUGCC5jslZaSuxpN4QxQddbppTIYJ+eBDYtHo xx8N5lkszQEpeK+mOjO60ZNHvqSFapKy21JlCgag1sxFweh0UJnZEdKwzWs8og1jXDu9Oevy gRUPcP6ljVSsz+i8OS9LzKmv6CDrqkwLSBeXtxF6gU2ITXXywcqUAQYo2WRrc+Brav4Avoqu PAJkczA4UOF4Wg2T2vFOu4pXQ7QxggP8MIID+AIBATCBpzCBmTELMAkGA1UEBhMCRVMxGDAW BgNVBAoTD0RhZW1vbiBTZWN1cml0eTEeMBwGA1UECxMVQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXR5 MR4wHAYDVQQDExVDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdHkxJDAiBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWFWNhQGRh ZW1vbnNlY3VyaXR5LmNvbTEKMAgGA1UEBRMBMAIJAI0DVR/84E8MMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggIp MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA2MDUxMTIxMTIz MVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFFDVFAZpuFv8T37dukv7TzbAQLDdMFIGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFF MEMwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIH MA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMIG4BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgaowgacwgZkxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkVTMRgw FgYDVQQKEw9EYWVtb24gU2VjdXJpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAsTFUNlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0 eTEeMBwGA1UEAxMVQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXR5MSQwIgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhVjYUBk YWVtb25zZWN1cml0eS5jb20xCjAIBgNVBAUTATACCQCNA1Uf/OBPDDCBugYLKoZIhvcNAQkQ AgsxgaqggacwgZkxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkVTMRgwFgYDVQQKEw9EYWVtb24gU2VjdXJpdHkxHjAc BgNVBAsTFUNlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0eTEeMBwGA1UEAxMVQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0 aG9yaXR5MSQwIgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhVjYUBkYWVtb25zZWN1cml0eS5jb20xCjAIBgNVBAUT ATACCQCNA1Uf/OBPDDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQAUpIbJGGjcLZ7xfLjJs1rii8aozHs+ lv98eWg/ABj2nh7gdzxxWTYA1OWryrAlNddKR53cigx3lAtniz67LPzLQenF+FEH9V5l70AH 8Tf4NAexrAtji7qtw4HzqZPhd2yHCZqIH8nwfzkowvHk6bRx2Az0+fLq3qnHLOUJ9C06zDk9 7lvHTwZpc0G26A57DhvyrhL3Cjf3i+daunD7Ti1fP02dan12fDotcmmcTbA9Jwcf4Y6+GAri EFIDQ165i0gqnD9xKSx3nKqzBq3jUTRpFCy8B2nzTlghwlNUQ6Fnt8rJFGkambV7bbMu2+CV 9EqSzzzqQ/8qJk6AcjI+aDcJAAAAAAAA --------------ms090506010303080800000408-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 21:56:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F40A16A42C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (malcolm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.206.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E191A43D49 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:56:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4BLuZ0p055223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 May 2006 14:56:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: (from mhunter@localhost) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3/Submit) id k4BLuZfg055222; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:56:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhunter) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:56:35 -0700 From: Mike Hunter To: Andy Reitz Message-ID: <20060511215634.GA55038@malcolm.berkeley.edu> References: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (malcolm.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 May 2006 14:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Johan Nilsson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp install / base not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:56:42 -0000 On May 11 at 17:06, "Andy Reitz" wrote: > On Thu, 11 May 2006, Johan Nilsson wrote: > > > But can you do a ftp-install from an archived version? If, how? > > Johan, > > While I have never tried this, sysinstall appears to support entering > non-standard FTP URLs. After you choose the FTP option, you can choose the > FTP server. The second option in this list is 'URL', which allows you to > type in any FTP site -- and as I presume, the ftp-archive site will work > if entered here. I will give this a try tomorrow. Thanks to you both for your help, you are both FreeBSD Olympic Champions. One unresolved question remains: Does the "any" suggestion have any effect? Has anybody ever used it successfully? Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 22:22:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E55216A44E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:22:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CE043D68 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:21:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k4BMLw2T093471; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:21:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:21:58 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Ian Lord Message-ID: <20060511222158.GE76653@dan.emsphone.com> References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060511141310.06394960@msdi.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7.0.0.16.2.20060511141310.06394960@msdi.ca> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Windows Filemon equivalent for freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:22:01 -0000 In the last episode (May 11), Ian Lord said: > Just a quick question, do you know a port that will do about the same > thing as filemon for windows ? > > Basically, just a command line tool to list all access to disk showing > > 1- File being access > 2- Success of failure > 3- Process accessing the file "ktrace -di -p0 -ti" is the closest we have at the moment, but that only logs the I/O actions themselves, not the syscalls generating the I/O. Removing the "-ti" flag will tell ktrace to log all I/O and all syscall activity, which may be information overload. If you're only interested in a single process, take a look at the truss command. If/when the port of Solaris' dtrace is completed, it will be able to do exactly what you want and more. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 22:25:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AA116A419 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C7843D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:25:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FeJb3-0006D3-V4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:25:25 +0200 Received: from 68.red-83-46-74.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.46.74.68]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:25:25 +0200 Received: from matiassurdi by 68.red-83-46-74.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:25:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Matias Surdi Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:25:11 +0200 Lines: 8 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.red-83-46-74.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) Sender: news Subject: omniback X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:25:41 -0000 Hi, Could someone tellme if there is client support for omniback backup system for FreeBSD? Where can I get it? Any tutorial or documentation? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 22:53:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFA216A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82BC44459 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:53:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so252879nfa for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:53:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=IBkVkuV7VVPuAy6bFIh1SvaeyXyih7cESkJZDhzOnX6Zpa62M8NNls231iFqk4Go2cpZC+7+b0KuDOZMutGcL4S9NyEhKgDu/QWJEKe43JfX0NurvkLzkMps71O7blmKJt2lK8Z5ly7UlfnCCIwSYkOJRdlA+wYrP+lkuOEXGxg= Received: by 10.49.10.9 with SMTP id n9mr638115nfi; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.15.12 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:10:56 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 114076b8c8e74991 Subject: ppp nat not working for some udp traffic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:53:19 -0000 Hello, I have a FreeBSD 5.4 box working as my gateway and PPPoE client. I'm using the -nat option to ensure that it does nat for me, which for the most part is working. But, I have a client trying to tftp and that traffic isn't getting through. We're using an odd port but it should still work. Private side: [root@kanga ~]# tcpdump -i sis0 -nn udp port 20001 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on sis0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 13:09:46.040334 IP 192.168.1.100.4999 > 216.191.234.113.20001: UDP, length:= 39 13:09:50.040473 IP 192.168.1.100.4999 > 216.191.234.113.20001: UDP, length:= 39 Public side: [root@kanga ~]# tcpdump -i tun0 -nn udp port 20001 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on tun0, link-type NULL (BSD loopback), capture size 96 bytes ^C 0 packets captured Any ideas? Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 22:55:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E262416A40E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:55:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF654445A for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:55:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4BMt7J9056685; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:55:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4463C0C6.9020905@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:55:02 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <9c8168780605100342h7d73c0c7uc64b08da8ed64585@mail.gmail.com> <9c8168780605100649v428a1218u7ce8fda393a70f6f@mail.gmail.com> <20060510101421.57a54656.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <9c8168780605100744n62b20da1mfe065d9a6292f7a8@mail.gmail.com> <20060510110011.e317d5b5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060510110011.e317d5b5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Anatomy of a Troll" by Bill Moran X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:55:12 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > There are other examples of this "Inflame then dodge" technique > in this thread. I'll leave their discovery as an exercise to the > reader. How many can _you_ find? > I wrote a script in sh, complete with artificial intelligence to do the assignment for me! Unfortunately: [497] Thu 11.May.2006 17:51:35 [admin@archangel][/www/data/] sh ./findtrolls ./findtrolls: Too many arguments ... I decided it was smarter than I thought ;-) KDK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 22:58:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5283B16A419 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BDC4440E for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:58:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4BMw49L056703; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:58:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4463C177.2030506@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:57:59 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Hunter References: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> <20060511215634.GA55038@malcolm.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060511215634.GA55038@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andy Reitz , Johan Nilsson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp install / base not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:58:16 -0000 Mike Hunter wrote: > > One unresolved question remains: Does the "any" suggestion have any > effect? Has anybody ever used it successfully? > > Mike With packages I've had success. I cannot recall trying this with the FTP distribution itself; I always use a current* image. Kevin Kinsey * that's "current" as in "currently supported", not -CURRENT as in "HEAD".... -- I'd never join any club that would have the likes of me as a member. -- Groucho Marx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 23:00:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E505816A5A0 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528A744318 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:35:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4BMZ832056581; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:35:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4463BC17.5060909@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:35:03 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Atom Powers References: <63874.209.103.215.99.1147376414.squirrel@email.polands.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bourne shell scripting resources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:01:02 -0000 Atom Powers wrote: > On 5/11/06, Doug Poland wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Can someone point me to a good on-line reference for Bourne shell >> scripting? I've come across some syntax I don't understand and, since >> I don't understand it, don't know how to search the web for it. > http://www.ooblick.com/text/sh/ KDK -- Endless Loop: n. see Loop, Endless. Loop, Endless: n. see Endless Loop. -- Random Shack Data Processing Dictionary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 23:00:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5423416A626 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web61025.mail.yahoo.com (web61025.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.179.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD4DC4439F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:39:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 82740 invoked by uid 60001); 11 May 2006 22:39:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ha+QuTm2RpE3wJizt/XsBYOncGFdUMVrU0CCT639nC4MxXQCwm7TVI05D15NNYBaiEVto6EWFnt4JVZTBy8l+w9PSDBdo5911/HnvVvp4zlWr3hsVfvYryB+Bo4u2wdblWh/oHH/pStrNS58G20MeXj4hq5X6AhO1x8xl1TL5MQ= ; Message-ID: <20060511223930.82738.qmail@web61025.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.86.22.118] by web61025.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:39:30 GMT Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:39:30 +0000 (GMT) From: "E. J. Cerejo" To: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Gnome2 fails because of avahi and howl ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:01:17 -0000 I'm running Freebsd 6 stable and I'm trying to upgrade gnome2 using portupgrade and I get this: ===> Installing for avahi-0.6.10_1 ===> avahi-0.6.10_1 conflicts with installed package(s): howl-1.0.0_1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/avahi. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/avahi. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall7725.0 make reinstall ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! net/avahi (install error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed I updated the ports several times already but I still get the same error, is there a way around this? EJC www.only7bucks.com --------------------------------- Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail - 1GB de espaço, alertas de e-mail no celular e anti-spam realmente eficaz. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 23:03:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B8916A4E5 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:03:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web61012.mail.yahoo.com (web61012.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.179.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E805643D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:03:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 42431 invoked by uid 60001); 11 May 2006 23:03:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rWWWEXgc3bQBxRarMDH5s4m9Kx7qGs4pRe2i/Vl071yMU3/w2SJpryyeeFloVWJgFCotch2opUF0uJRGxhhut8PMykeoF0YcVEbe8YA81/rnxAfs5aN/9X0U5BZ6TC+qUqUwMbrkXu92/VdQNMQO08VIhZ+ow/cFWr4PQw237Co= ; Message-ID: <20060511230306.42429.qmail@web61012.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.86.22.118] by web61012.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:03:06 ART Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:03:06 -0300 (ART) From: "E. J. Cerejo" To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:03:18 -0000 'm running Freebsd 6 stable and I'm trying to upgrade gnome2 using portupgrade and I get this: ===> Installing for avahi-0.6.10_1 ===> avahi-0.6.10_1 conflicts with installed package(s): howl-1.0.0_1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/avahi. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/avahi. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall7725.0 make reinstall ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! net/avahi (install error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed I updated the ports several times already but I still get the same error, is there a way around this? EJC www.only7bucks.com --------------------------------- Novidade no Yahoo! Mail: receba alertas de novas mensagens no seu celular. Registre seu aparelho agora! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 23:17:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD14016A516 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:17:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0457143D76 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:17:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4BNGvxN056846; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:16:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4463C5E4.50109@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:16:52 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Barnaby Scott References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:17:06 -0000 Barnaby Scott wrote: > > The boot sequence all goes smoothly, telling me all sorts of things I > never thought I'd need to know, and frankly don't understand, until it > gets to the following line: > > Configuring syscons: keymap blanktime screensaver. > > and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5 minutes > every time. > > Can this be normal? If not, what do I do? (Words of one syllable only > please!) > Might be more good to check what goes *next*. A thing oft seen is the M-T-A can't solve its add. Check the hosts file. =============================================== Or can I actually use multi-syllable words? A common "hangup" is Sendmail, which needs to er, "find itself", and if the machine's IP isn't available from DNS or the hosts file (/etc/hosts), or *perhaps* if there's no/dumb hostname, it'll time out trying to get resolution of the IP address.... So, what does console say *after* the 5 minute wait? I've not watched a system boot for a while, having configured the splash console.... Kevin Kinsey -- I believe in getting into hot water; it keeps you clean. -- G. K. Chesterton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 23:20:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C62216A538; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (xbsd.org [82.233.2.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792D343D62; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:19:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A7A1150A; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:19:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49174-07; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:19:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cream.stl.xbsd.org (unknown [193.120.13.130]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B275B11443; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:19:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Florent Thoumie To: "E. J. Cerejo" In-Reply-To: <20060511223930.82738.qmail@web61025.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060511223930.82738.qmail@web61025.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hezAh5QLYV9NG1tK+6OJ" Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:19:26 +0200 Message-Id: <1147389566.80625.41.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome2 fails because of avahi and howl ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:20:19 -0000 --=-hezAh5QLYV9NG1tK+6OJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 22:39 +0000, E. J. Cerejo wrote: > I'm running Freebsd 6 stable and I'm trying to upgrade gnome2 using portu= pgrade and I get this: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> Installing for avahi-0.6.10_1 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> avahi-0.6.10_1 conflicts with installed package(s):=20 > howl-1.0.0_1 >=20 > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/net/avahi. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/net/avahi. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall7725= .0 make reinstall > ** Fix the installation problem and try again. > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! net/avahi (install error) > ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed >=20 > I updated the ports several times already but I still get the same error,= is there a way around this? One day, you'll get spanked for not reading /usr/ports/UPDATING. --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --=-hezAh5QLYV9NG1tK+6OJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEY8Z+MxEkbVFH3PQRAvqRAJ9t77OcybuB40KCLbaa+bfZEzKnVACbBY77 c58saGntlubrBl8K6hl6fuo= =ec0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hezAh5QLYV9NG1tK+6OJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 23:22:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094F416A5C5 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAF143D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so396913pye for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:22:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=U39HatXwsUdeVm0Z6UU++RXTTIWI3aG6N7FplEaC320j5unGbQTNxjywINp+UiNMdq2eNiVV4NNaiTpdC62CJb9sQ9ZxFtUO7xSq59xro1ScUjklJbEoYi547jDUAu74Tkwer8hdi29MS9n0qazwh4q8eA8eCthrzOM0uTHByts= Received: by 10.35.39.2 with SMTP id r2mr1785903pyj; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.22.10 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:22:44 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "E. J. Cerejo" In-Reply-To: <20060511230306.42429.qmail@web61012.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060511230306.42429.qmail@web61012.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:22:50 -0000 On 5/12/06, E. J. Cerejo wrote: > 'm running Freebsd 6 stable and I'm trying to upgrade gnome2 using portup= grade and I get this: > > =3D=3D=3D> Installing for avahi-0.6.10_1 > > =3D=3D=3D> avahi-0.6.10_1 conflicts with installed package(s): > howl-1.0.0_1 > > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/avahi. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/avahi. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall7725= .0 make reinstall > ** Fix the installation problem and try again. > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! net/avahi (install error) > ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed > > I updated the ports several times already but I still get the same error= , is there a way around this? Yes, read /usr/ports/UPDATING: 20060429: AFFECTS: All GNOME users AUTHOR: gnome@FreeBSD.org GNOME has been updated to 2.14. This new release does NOT require the use of the gnome_upgrade.sh script. That script should not be used. Instead, use the following simple recipe: pkgdb -Ff portupgrade -o net/avahi -f howl portupgrade -o x11/gnome-screensaver -f xscreensaver-gnome portupgrade -a > > EJC > www.only7bucks.com > --=20 Pietro Cerutti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 23:32:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E1316A469 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC4443D8F for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:32:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.6+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k4BNW853016417 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:32:08 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.96] (dzihan.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.96]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.6+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k4BNW60k031824 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:32:08 -0700 Message-ID: <4463C976.30305@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:32:06 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8-1.1.1.1vy+fc4 (X11/20060419) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060511141310.06394960@msdi.ca> <20060511222158.GE76653@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20060511222158.GE76653@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Windows Filemon equivalent for freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:32:24 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: >In the last episode (May 11), Ian Lord said: > > >>Just a quick question, do you know a port that will do about the same >>thing as filemon for windows ? >> >>Basically, just a command line tool to list all access to disk showing >> >> 1- File being access >> 2- Success of failure >> 3- Process accessing the file >> >> > >"ktrace -di -p0 -ti" is the closest we have at the moment, but that >only logs the I/O actions themselves, not the syscalls generating the >I/O. Removing the "-ti" flag will tell ktrace to log all I/O and all >syscall activity, which may be information overload. If you're only >interested in a single process, take a look at the truss command. >If/when the port of Solaris' dtrace is completed, it will be able to do >exactly what you want and more. > > > Not sure about requirement #2, but the lsof port does similar things and I think accomplishes requirements #1 and #3 according to what you want. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 00:13:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC1C16A401 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bds@waywood.co.uk) Received: from lon-mail-3.gradwell.net (lon-mail-3.gradwell.net [193.111.201.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9674044016 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:13:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bds@waywood.co.uk) Received: from [84.12.167.94] ([84.12.167.94] helo=[192.168.1.4] country=GB ident=bds#pop3&waywood#co$uk) by lon-mail-3.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.217) id 4463d30a.126fc.c9; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:12:58 +0100 (envelope-sender ) Message-ID: <4463D2EC.1020100@waywood.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:12:28 +0100 From: Barnaby Scott User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Kinsey References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <4463C5E4.50109@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <4463C5E4.50109@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:13:04 -0000 Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Barnaby Scott wrote: >> >> The boot sequence all goes smoothly, telling me all sorts of things I >> never thought I'd need to know, and frankly don't understand, until it >> gets to the following line: >> >> Configuring syscons: keymap blanktime screensaver. >> >> and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5 minutes >> every time. >> >> Can this be normal? If not, what do I do? (Words of one syllable only >> please!) >> > > Might be more good to check what goes *next*. > > A thing oft seen is the M-T-A can't solve its > add. Check the hosts file. > > =============================================== > > Or can I actually use multi-syllable words? A > common "hangup" is Sendmail, which needs to er, > "find itself", and if the machine's IP isn't available > from DNS or the hosts file (/etc/hosts), or *perhaps* > if there's no/dumb hostname, it'll time out trying > to get resolution of the IP address.... > > So, what does console say *after* the 5 minute wait? > I've not watched a system boot for a while, having > configured the splash console.... > > Kevin Kinsey > Thanks for your reply. It didn't occur to me to look at the next line - I thought it must still be doing the Configuring syscons thing! Anyway, the next line is: Initial i386 initialization:. Armed with this knowledge, I just found this post: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-questions/2004-April/043478.html (although I don't know where the rest of the thread went). However it doesn't leave me much the wiser! The hostname is mentioned earlier in the sequence, so presumably the OS is already aware of that, and as for DNS server, what DNS server? Barnaby Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 00:17:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A18016A4FB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: from vsmtp21.tin.it (vsmtp21.tin.it [212.216.176.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3220443F78 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:17:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it) Received: from localhost.localdomain (87.5.239.75) by vsmtp21.tin.it (7.2.072.1) id 4460A7A3002EFB0D for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:17:35 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:19:11 +0100 Message-ID: <3c63c4dbcfb5ff4127468e06d386d1b9@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 (Generated by Pantomime 1.1.2) From: .VWV. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: GNUMail.app (Version 1.1.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Subject: booting from diskette X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:17:37 -0000 Greetings to all from Europe. I would like to know, the data necessary to make a loader diskette similar to the one used for booting FreeBSD, useful to boot with the same loader the Windows system. In other words, I would like to know what kind of operation does the FreeBSD loader on the MBR, in order to boot Windows. Thanks, please CC me VITTORI From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 00:24:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B599516A439 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:24:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patman@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBF343F04 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:59:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from patman@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so312181nzf for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:58:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AQRYtXD51g4MbNdZ5Wqat6lXH7tU8e2jpEa0ka8HoX3wSteS2copwyNVKjLGPzQkpLTSqeV7LeLqTp/XjaNRdb4hsCla3Uc9Z0tu76r6iMcQwww9IMbd7NdCgYv+xD7Ir2Haw7Rmd8AmiSHsF4VN0f9htwehRnNFy35h1+GK0XE= Received: by 10.65.132.12 with SMTP id j12mr1129847qbn; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.232.8 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40089b080605111658w264b281dhb4dae8b26e297f9d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:58:42 -0700 From: "patrick w. dondl" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD 6.1 and MATLAB R2006a problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:24:09 -0000 Hello, I can more or less successfully run the current MATLAB version, however I d= o get the following error message on startup: ---------- < M A T L A B > Copyright 1984-2006 The MathWorks, Inc. Version 7.2.0.294 (R2006a) January 27, 2006 ??? Can't load '/usr/compat/linux/opt/matlab/bin/glnx86/libmwbuiltins.so': /usr/compat/linux/opt/matlab/bin/glnx86/libmwbuiltins.so: symbol dlinfo, version GLIBC_2.3.3 not defined in file libdl.so.2 with link time reference Error in =3D=3D> matlabrc at 58 str =3D sprintf('%s', lasterr); >> ----------- it seems that the symbol GLIBC_2.3.3 is defined in /usr/compat/linux/lib/libdl.so.2, but I'm no expert at those things. Any advice on what I could try, or what that message means? Thanks, Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 00:24:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D4616A522 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pg@eth1.com) Received: from web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB85943DB3 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:24:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pg@eth1.com) Received: (qmail 24143 invoked by uid 60001); 12 May 2006 00:24:08 -0000 Message-ID: <20060512002408.24141.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.60.33.44] by web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:24:08 PDT X-RocketYMMF: kjerstes Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:24:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter G To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Fatal Trap 10: trace trap while in vm86 mode, trying to boot install CD after menu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pg@eth1.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:25:05 -0000 trying to install 6.1 on a bunch of blade servers, P4 3.06Ghz w/ 2GB RAM SEARCHED THRU ALL THE ARCHIVES AND MAIL LISTS for ANY similar happenings and there are NO valuable clues.. Tried installing Fbsd 6.1, 6.0 and even a hard drive that had 5.4 pre-installed same result always AFTER the boot menu, (picked ACPI disabled and no diff) Fatal Trap 10: trace trap while in vm86 mode They ran Linux just fine.. is there something about Hyperthreading or something that makes these hang?? i also tried to do this in the boot loader prompt after the boot menu w/ no better results: set hw.hasbrokenint12=1 any clues appreciated as to what i should lookit next.. --Pete PS: pls also send email to thsi addr: pg at eth1 dot com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 01:38:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD86816A400 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5379043D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:38:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id r21so242695wxc for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:38:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=UMSyrCrF245WTJeneKPLG5DqYKsvuyiasYNEJ1Pyx1lQBTzSbmD0Y13ZRh44UUP5Urxreb/m8IN9T8c7cOVrCfGyF0gO23AMJC4aUWgr09Hshl7zVdw2mP2WP3YmU7C/cNp2vuj5A0ZayozBSx8XNwN/Y1NjFtxB8MgtpYcovik= Received: by 10.70.72.1 with SMTP id u1mr2106887wxa; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.42.4 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:38:56 -0700 From: "Derrick Ryalls" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: New folder permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:38:57 -0000 Greetings, I am having issues getting correct permissions set for files in a common area on a web/file server. I have webroot shared out via samba and under there I have an auto-thumbnail generation script that creates thumbnails in somefolder/.cache where somefolder is a newly created folder. Example: autothumbs\ mypics1\ image.jpg .cache image_thumb.jpg mypics2\ .cache ... What needs to happen is when a new folder is created under this autothumb tree, the permissions need to be set correctly so that the .cache folder can be automatically generated by the thumbnail process. I have the main folder listed as root:wheel 777 but when new folders are created they have user:wheel 755 permissions and the thumbnail script fails as it cannot write to the location. Is there something I am missing to get this setup properly? I know a workaround is the manually change the permissions of the folder when it is created, but since my wife will be wanting to add pictures, that isn't an option for her (very non-techy). The machine in question a 5.4-Stable box. Any suggestions on what I need to do? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 01:40:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0609016A445 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFA743D53 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:40:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (snipe.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by grog.secure-computing.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4C1jGeN000991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:45:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=grog; d=secure-computing.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=SFITkh54BMOt8SzzjQlMw7hXGyiPaykd2QMqVILJZ8mRuNjO//4WQwut/4QzDAppG hXA/Gmka9XyJsCUkG9gCA== Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: questions FreeBSD From: Eric F Crist Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:40:52 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on grog.secure-computing.net Subject: [OT] DomainKeys question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:40:57 -0000 Hello list! I've been trying to get DomainKeys working for my domain, with marginal success. With the many test addresses out there, my installation is listed as successful on only one of the three addresses I've tested. I know this is vague, but I'm not sure what information to include. Thanks for any input. ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 02:25:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C211B16A401 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3F04426B for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:25:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.66.115]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060512022512.QHYZ8718.mta9.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:25:12 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 621E1B76B; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:25:32 -0400 From: Parv To: Barnaby Scott Message-ID: <20060512022532.GA4383@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Barnaby Scott , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 02:25:15 -0000 in message <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk>, wrote Barnaby Scott thusly... > > I have mangaged to install version 6.0 and have had a bit of a > play, but not before re-installing because the boot had been > sooooo slow ... > The boot sequence all goes smoothly ... > until it gets to the following line: > > Configuring syscons: keymap blanktime screensaver. > > and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5 > minutes every time. Does your screen goes blank just after the above message? If so, press [Enter] key, you should see the boot being continued, and "login:" waiting for input at the end. > PS I am conscious that I don't really know the etiquette around > here too well (apart from not mentioning the logo!) - I don't want > to clutter the list with messages of thanks when help is given, > but at the same time I don't want to seem ungrateful - which is > right? I think everybody appreciates the message when OP tells when/if the problem is solved. IMO, there is really no need to generate a message for each person; a combined (if applicable) public thank you note should be enough. Thanking people who have helped you give them the incentive to keep on helping you & others. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 02:43:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EE516A717 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: from smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 545C643D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:43:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: (qmail 49044 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 02:43:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?75.7.236.228?) (jekillen@prodigy.net@75.7.236.228 with plain) by smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 02:43:49 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <191ac950d308bc36847f124e686b38f2@prodigy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions From: jekillen Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 19:44:23 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Subject: Paticipation rather than griping. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 02:43:58 -0000 As a gesture of participation in this group and a FreeBSD user my self, I have had more track record with Photoshop and Quark Express on Mac. I also have two high resolution color laser printers. I can grab a logo off the web page and load it into photo shop, do a color separation and print a proof and submit it to some one with some sway in FreeBSD. But seriously, a good high resolution file can be rastorized and sent to a printer complete with text (rastorized in the image) and a printer can print it from the Rastorized file on a laser printer. It doesn't need to be done 4 color offset. I expressed some question of the new logo but consider that I am not technically advanced enough to contribute things like patches, or BETA testing. Another responder to my logo subject e_mail asked me since I represented my self as a graphic designer and fine artist why I didn't submit something to the contest. It didn't dawn on me at the time. But, now I am coming up with some design ideas that are in somewhat of a totally different direction and reflect what my personal preferences in a logo would be. That is too late in the game but I would like to work up some ideas that you can review and keep on a shelf if they are interesting enough. I have just finally got my web site back on the 'air'. But I don't want to exploit the list for the sake of self promotion. Direct responses to me via e-mail and positive inquiries as to how and to whom I can submit some hard copy sketches and preliminary proofs. I can't reproduce volumes of copies on large format lazer without charging something. It costs over $900.00 to replace the toner on this machine and $700 some odd to replace it on my 8.5 X 11 printer. I am a glorified hobbyist. I make virtually no money so far in spite of spending the last 10 years trying to learn how to use computers and software, doing javascript, php, mysql, various other scripting languages to get up a decent enough web site. This is why I like open source, I have even drifted away from the expense of keeping up with Mac hardware and software. I have Yellow Dog Linux running on my older Macs. I can understand the frustration that volunteers must feel that assume responsibility for a commendable project like FreeBSD. So in conclusion, instead of griping about the logo, I will offer what I can contribute. You wouldn't mind if I posted my own logo ideas for Free BSD on my web site? I will give out the domain name to direct e-mail response. My site is served over an ADSL connection and hasn't been stress tested. And it won't be for a few weeks before I get a presentation posted. Thanks for being here; Jeff Killen (in Los Angeles) (JK) > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 02:59:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE5E16A427 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:59:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bds@waywood.co.uk) Received: from lon-mail-3.gradwell.net (lon-mail-3.gradwell.net [193.111.201.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65A543D53 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:59:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bds@waywood.co.uk) Received: from [84.12.167.94] ([84.12.167.94] helo=[192.168.1.4] country=GB ident=bds^pop3*waywood#co^uk) by lon-mail-3.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.217) id 4463fa1a.6aca.30; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:59:38 +0100 (envelope-sender ) Message-ID: <4463F9F7.8070009@waywood.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 03:59:03 +0100 From: Barnaby Scott User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Barnaby Scott , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <20060512022532.GA4383@holestein.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <20060512022532.GA4383@holestein.holy.cow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 02:59:41 -0000 Parv wrote: ... >> and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5 >> minutes every time. > > Does your screen goes blank just after the above message? If so, > press [Enter] key, you should see the boot being continued, and > "login:" waiting for input at the end. No the screen still has all the previous clutter on it, and pressing [Enter] just makes a new line > > >> PS I am conscious that I don't really know the etiquette around >> here too well (apart from not mentioning the logo!) - I don't want >> to clutter the list with messages of thanks when help is given, >> but at the same time I don't want to seem ungrateful - which is >> right? > > I think everybody appreciates the message when OP tells when/if the > problem is solved. > > IMO, there is really no need to generate a message for each person; > a combined (if applicable) public thank you note should be enough. > Thanking people who have helped you give them the incentive to keep > on helping you & others. > > > - Parv > Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 03:27:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB93516A41A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=02800913fd@iecc.com) Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DDA143DBB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:07:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=02800913fd@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 3182 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 03:07:18 -0000 Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail2.iecc.com with QMQP; 12 May 2006 03:07:18 -0000 Date: 12 May 2006 03:07:18 -0000 Message-ID: <20060512030718.14162.qmail@simone.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <191ac950d308bc36847f124e686b38f2@prodigy.net> Organization: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: jekillen@prodigy.net Subject: setuid perl scripts ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 03:27:21 -0000 It is my distinct impression that setuid perl scripts are supposed to work. That is, if you have an executable perl script with the setuid bit, perl will start itself up and run suidperl or something and do the necessary backflips to get itself running with the script's owner as the effective UID. This doesn't seem to to work in perl 5.8.8 on FreeBSD 6.0, using a copy of perl built in the obvious way in the ports tree. Is it supposed to work? Do I have to do something special to turn it on? R's, John Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): Compile-time options: MYMALLOC PERL_MALLOC_WRAP USE_64_BIT_INT USE_LARGE_FILES USE_PERLIO Locally applied patches: defined-or Built under freebsd Compiled at May 10 2006 20:36:34 @INC: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8 . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 03:43:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A913716A43B for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from berner_paul@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay104-dav18.bay104.hotmail.com [65.54.175.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E13243E89 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:11:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from berner_paul@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:11:12 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 138.88.99.148 by BAY104-DAV18.phx.gbl with DAV; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:11:08 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [138.88.99.148] X-Originating-Email: [berner_paul@hotmail.com] X-Sender: berner_paul@hotmail.com From: "Paul Berner" To: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:12:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2006 03:11:12.0228 (UTC) FILETIME=[B9019240:01C67571] Subject: have devfs but no /dev/fd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 03:44:00 -0000 mtools can't find /dev/fd0 because /dev/fd0 does not exit (and /dev/floppy does not exit). Can't use MKDEV because I am using FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. mount says: devfs on /dev so I guess devfsd is running. dmesg says: fdc0: port ...etc. so I guess the boot probe found by floppy hardware. So why doesn't devfs automatically make a floppy special file for me???? Thanks for the help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 04:45:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990F216A401 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:45:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=02800913fd@iecc.com) Received: from xuxa.iecc.com (xuxa.iecc.com [208.31.42.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27B60441D8 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:45:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=02800913fd@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 26194 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 04:45:26 -0000 Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail2.iecc.com with QMQP; 12 May 2006 04:45:26 -0000 Date: 12 May 2006 04:45:26 -0000 Message-ID: <20060512044526.37896.qmail@simone.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060512030718.14162.qmail@simone.iecc.com> Organization: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: setuid perl scripts ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 04:45:27 -0000 >It is my distinct impression that setuid perl scripts are supposed to >work. Never mind, I figured it out. You have to rebuild perl with ENABLE_SUIDPERL=yes R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 07:35:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC19A16A409 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from futhwo@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239D744071 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:35:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from futhwo@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so373521nzf for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:35:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=snrnaaaCyNslXp4wIoSbQxj0jOUhl6lmhBBOcP0QnHFcmnKSlhZFP1HN5YCd3mB5RXHJ1ed27j73xhCM3v5QImU7ae4TokwGFhXGcGDzJrOM3VNPiVbSjwmJW1DexUbgCwujnata4q8RNh/O9pg7k9WJrYnahntSz7QDzUSTJpY= Received: by 10.65.212.11 with SMTP id o11mr1311317qbq; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?85.239.177.182? ( [85.239.177.182]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e13sm2620031qbe.2006.05.12.00.35.12; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:35:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4463A8BD.2060306@locolomo.org> References: <4463A8BD.2060306@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <299E6AA9-D15B-429B-AB0E-B25D66CF0FCC@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: futhwo Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:35:10 +0200 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Restricting root access to ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:35:17 -0000 man slapd.access Hi Ivan On May 11, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Erik N=F8rgaard wrote: > Hi: > > How do I restrict root/administrative access to my ldap (openldap 2.3) > directory? > > I want to allow root connection only from localhost or a list of > authorized hosts, while allowing other users to connect from anywhere. > > Thanks, Erik > --=20 > Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org > X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt > Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 07:58:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F256D16A402 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wingot@eftel.com) Received: from tara2.wa.amnet.net.au (tara2.wa.amnet.net.au [203.161.126.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAC243D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:58:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wingot@eftel.com) Received: (qmail 6952 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2006 07:58:10 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 6930, pid: 6932, t: 1.9843s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.88/m:36/d:1310 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tara2.wa.amnet.net.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (203.161.72.123) by tara2.wa.amnet.net.au with SMTP for ; 12 May 2006 07:58:08 -0000 X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4464401A.8010708@eftel.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:58:18 +0800 From: Adrian Pavone User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Issue setting SSID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:58:30 -0000 I'm not sure on the etiquette of reposting, however, this post is now 23 pages down my screen, so I doubt anyone would see the original. This possibly means no-one knows, but if that is the case, would anyone be able to point me in the right direction for people that possibly do? ---------------------------- Hey, I've got an RTL8180 that I have compiled a module for using ndisgen. The first time I installed FreeBSD, this worked fine, with exactly the same version of the driver, and I was able to use it, however, the computer power ran out during a portupgrade, rendering /usr unuseable. Now that I have reinstalled FreeBSD from scratch (wiping the partition and reinstalling from the same FreeBSD6.0-RELEASE cds), I have recompiled the module using ndisgen again, and kldload rtl8180_sys loads the module (with ndis and if_ndis loaded), without any errors output. An ifconfig shows ndis0, including the correct MAC Address. Now, when I try to set the ssid with ifconfig ndis0 ssid wingot (the name of my home network), and then run another ifconfig, ndis0 still has an SSID of only "". I have also reinstalled the system another time since, and the same issue is occuring. If anyone knows of a non-ndis version of this driver already available for FreeBSD (I know NetBSD has one), can they please point me in the correct direction, but otherwise, does anyone have any idea why the wireless device will not accept an SSID with ifconfig? No output is returned at any stage indicating any issues, and I have looked in /var/log and cannot find any problems logged. Any help would be greatly appreciated, Adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 09:10:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F69C16A440 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC65E43D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:10:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 22467 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 09:10:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.50.146.220]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 May 2006 09:10:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:10:38 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: Adrian Pavone Message-ID: <20060512111038.2d33cf2b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <4464401A.8010708@eftel.com> References: <4464401A.8010708@eftel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_qb.VSA2vjtNmx3CL5wv14=e"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issue setting SSID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:10:57 -0000 --Sig_qb.VSA2vjtNmx3CL5wv14=e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adrian Pavone wrote: > I'm not sure on the etiquette of reposting, however, this post is now 23= =20 > pages down my screen, so I doubt anyone would see the original. This=20 > possibly means no-one knows, but if that is the case, would anyone be=20 > able to point me in the right direction for people that possibly do? It could also mean that some know but think you should check the archive to see that similar questions were asked several times in the last days. > I've got an RTL8180 that I have compiled a module for using ndisgen. The > first time I installed FreeBSD, this worked fine, with exactly the same > version of the driver, and I was able to use it, however, the computer > power ran out during a portupgrade, rendering /usr unuseable. Now that I > have reinstalled FreeBSD from scratch (wiping the partition and > reinstalling from the same FreeBSD6.0-RELEASE cds), I have recompiled > the module using ndisgen again, and kldload rtl8180_sys loads the module > (with ndis and if_ndis loaded), without any errors output. An ifconfig > shows ndis0, including the correct MAC Address. >=20 > Now, when I try to set the ssid with ifconfig ndis0 ssid wingot (the > name of my home network), and then run another ifconfig, ndis0 still has > an SSID of only "". I have also reinstalled the system another time > since, and the same issue is occuring. IIRC you only see the SSID with ifconfig if the NIC is up. Sometimes it helps to set the SSID together with the BSSID. Search the archive for more suggestions. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_qb.VSA2vjtNmx3CL5wv14=e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZFETjV8GA4rMKUQRAkw5AJwMbsejQFtLM6kCZmbgKHjWLqMoewCdFrBu BeWWXN25rueWvrL8JeBuiCE= =c6Y1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_qb.VSA2vjtNmx3CL5wv14=e-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 09:12:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B5616A56F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60013.mail.yahoo.com (web60013.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F28143D69 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:12:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 61851 invoked by uid 60001); 12 May 2006 09:12:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=05x5vk97NcLavtWSiEOXYogr2PjaHoXqIWmu83HOcSGwUpXDz2RxqgFUkwhAQ3IebWvSoVTWCpWeCTH12Vy9KoIsMl5erz5wkLOnqr8wzZBuvzF3nKlDcEPqWbYDWERqffH2wkarEntaggJgwcSQ9/ZRv33H3Liqni0e1+icC0I= ; Message-ID: <20060512091240.61849.qmail@web60013.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.81.189.3] by web60013.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:12:40 EDT Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 05:12:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: pcre and pcre-utf8 incompatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:12:54 -0000 I am having trouble upgrading my ports because my 5.4 system wants to install both pcre and pcre-utf8 but the ports themselves complain when they see the other installed. I normally build the pcre port with UTF8 support (using pkgtools.conf) but for some reason my last upgrade is presenting me with this problem (pcre-utf8 wants to be installed). How do I get around this dilemma? Peter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 09:13:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE4816A61B for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23A143DA5 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:13:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-242.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.242]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7676D4C626; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:24:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A6E5285B; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:11:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44645182.1070302@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:12:34 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Berner References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: have devfs but no /dev/fd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:13:21 -0000 Paul Berner schrieb: > dmesg says: > fdc0: port ...etc. > so I guess the boot probe found by floppy hardware. Probably you didn't quote the relevant lines. Please show the complete /var/run/dmesg.boot. Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 11:58:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D4216A405 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9891943D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:58:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stapleton.41@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so309095wxc for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:58:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HIWohAk7aivLcVScmNXh6VzP333YFJsK3HPrcCr28+NQJaRvQH7nXxYibf1OvpE4YlxsrDIYi2mp5W4tfbtMYDkvfww7wEPDWeOLys+8cuN3TIvbqLFUo/rLxXPueYz8eHHfPARymlPwFOxr3S8ypU548I+C2w4vfshQ8g7HStg= Received: by 10.70.96.5 with SMTP id t5mr2785886wxb; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.76.10 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80f4f2b20605120458r1c7a4514u59f107945628f4a1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:58:12 -0400 From: "Jim Stapleton" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:58:15 -0000 I know someone did it in linux for a booth at the mall for his company within the last year and a half, but I don't know the info. He had something like 4 consoles per machine. I'll ask, you'll find a response on this link, if one comes: http://vnboards.ign.com/pc_generalhardwaresoftware_and_tech_support/b22497/= 96702885/p1/?0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 12:03:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB43F16A516 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bondka@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB9243D7C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:03:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bondka@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so29126uge for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:03:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=SMoQ2z2I6rY1LwNvu4cYH+/hvCc2FRA/dG+J6SjQPk6+3WonZ3fqmodZEW6zcLR0UmaL+d3yIsALAXWhGVqlB8BLYUNJFjVODaeyJrNGWppX393pq4b9XLFduHwodq0behlBCr222bVoa8qB680XzfTo1TvF6kh1yylwMikglTU= Received: by 10.66.6.29 with SMTP id 29mr1598545ugf; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:03:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.71.12 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:03:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:03:23 -0400 From: "Kenneth Bond" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Estimated EoL for 6.1-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:03:36 -0000 Hello, As per the security advisories page on the FreeBSD website, the 6.1 release is to be supported by the security officer for a period of 24 months, yet it is listed as a "Normal" release, indicating a 12 month security support period. Is this correct? Branch =09Release =09Type =09Release Date =09Estimated EoL RELENG_6_1 =096.1-RELEASE =09Normal =09May 9, 2006 =09May 31, 2008 Please advise, Thank you for your help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 12:18:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D024216A400 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:18:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgeorge.ml@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6620343D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:18:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgeorge.ml@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so418797nzf for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=lYuivtddgmMXwmCb8sDBRlUUb602xX+PZlD4NmTj3bC7NhgUvVGHozEuSqDdRUfywI8C0CQkvl7JKmyK8B3yTjYPkh1jfkmW3f5EP99nMXD2NvjnEfGB+oMYQDkNOMnj2swbQLIwYQVv1g97W5qEejJWi+v+yGgGvsMtwb0h4W4= Received: by 10.64.151.20 with SMTP id y20mr1500433qbd; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.51.7 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:48:30 +0530 From: "Siju George" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Bittorrent link for 6.1 does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:18:32 -0000 Hi, I am not subscribed to the list. The Bittorrent Link on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/announce.html doesnot seem to work :-( Bittorrent The FreeBSD project encourages the use of BitTorrent for distributing the release ISO images. A collection of torrent files to download the images is available at: http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/ Thankyou so much kind Regards Siju From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 12:31:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C8716A411 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7AA43D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:31:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd3mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr4so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.180]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ5009N5K4DF8D0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:31:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml1so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.145]) by pd3mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ5002QGK4DEMK0@pd3mr4so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:31:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([24.82.18.31]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ5009FYK4CZVI0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:31:25 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:31:13 -0400 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: To: Kenneth Bond Message-id: <44648011.8040203@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 References: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060416) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Estimated EoL for 6.1-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:31:26 -0000 Kenneth Bond wrote: > As per the security advisories page on the FreeBSD website, the 6.1 > release is to be supported by the security officer for a period of 24 > months, yet it is listed as a "Normal" release Oops. > indicating a 12 month > security support period. Is this correct? > > Branch Release Type Release Date Estimated EoL > RELENG_6_1 6.1-RELEASE Normal May 9, 2006 May 31, 2008 Once the web site rebuilds, it will be correctly listed as an Extended release. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 12:56:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B46216A403 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC23543D4C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:56:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so536680pya for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:56:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=b90Mrp/TrQbd339fI2zuLSP29OAkr6nABCDPV8u1+BwdQ4SCMXSRHStQlBQ1u9XgUcexskKekRCJa1jEbO0LCS6gcaq/F9v8na8syaeZ4iRqQT3ovu+SNccuDzlflKAxgRqnAb0AAkQ1nGeXX/ejEqUCOvO3pSqezQDrD5hJSvo= Received: by 10.35.15.11 with SMTP id s11mr724351pyi; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.29.20 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0605120556g78e88afn290f25de3ff129eb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:56:43 +0100 From: Chris To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20060511175135.GA71742@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> <8a0028260605110826h13211353rbe374ccc5f5e7ce4@mail.gmail.com> <20060511175135.GA71742@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: Kouji Ito , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:56:45 -0000 On 11/05/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote: > > Are maintenance releases of old branches always released in step with n= ew > > ones, or is it just coincidence that it's happening this way this time? > > It was deliberate this time to avoid an extra ports freeze cycle, > since that has very high cost and the benefit is really low since the > intended audience for 5.5 is small and everyone who can do so will be > much better off with the enormous benefits of 6. > > Kris > > > Ahh makes sense to me now, since port freezes are annoying. So there is no danger of 5.5 been released after 5.4 EOL then? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 12:56:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B665216A401 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:56:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2823143D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:56:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FeXCL-000030-6J by authid for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:56:49 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:56:49 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512125648.GG5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <4463C5E4.50109@daleco.biz> <4463D2EC.1020100@waywood.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4463D2EC.1020100@waywood.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:56:51 -0000 --5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:12:28AM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote: > Thanks for your reply. It didn't occur to me to look at the next line -= =20 > I thought it must still be doing the Configuring syscons thing! >=20 > Anyway, the next line is: >=20 > Initial i386 initialization:. >=20 > Armed with this knowledge, I just found this post:=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-questions/2004-April/04347= 8.html=20 > (although I don't know where the rest of the thread went). However it=20 > doesn't leave me much the wiser! The hostname is mentioned earlier in the= =20 > sequence, so presumably the OS is already aware of that, and as for DNS= =20 > server, what DNS server? The fact that the operating system knows what the machine is called, does not necessarily mean that the name is in the DNS. You can put an entry in your /etc/hosts file (take a look at the file for the format), which will allow sendmail and other daemons to start. You should also check that your hostname is in the DNS. You might find something like DynDNS or ZoneEdit useful if your machine is on a dynamically assigned domestic range, such as you'd get from NTL or Telewest. As for the DNS server, you need to tell FreeBSD where to go to resolve names to IP addresses. You do this by putting the IP addresses of your ISP's name servers in your /etc/resolv.conf (yes, there really is no 'e' on the end of resolv). The format is 'nameserver IP.add.re.ss', without the quotes (man 5 resolv.conf will give you more detail). You should also check in /etc/nsswitch.conf to make sure that you have an entry that looks like this: hosts: files dns This tells your local resolver library to consult /etc/hosts before it goes to the DNS. If I am teaching Grandma how to suck eggs, I apologise - I got the impression from the tone of your post, though, that you are quite new=20 to all this UNIX stuff! HTH Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZIYQixf5fBYiFmoRAhI5AJ9CUpgES30jyvNvkcDmPIT0Qo/KvACg2Cmn My2ovvru1JDWgLrfQSm9KcA= =sdDf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:07:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD50316A40F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAC643D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:07:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-95-215.51-151.net24.it [151.51.215.95]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CDB1Tp065884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:11:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CD78w4062113; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:07:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <44648884.7040002@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:07:16 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Greenwood , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> <4463666B.5030105@netfence.it> <3ee9ca710605110932u1e9fa9e9wf2af3444c9a885ef@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3ee9ca710605110932u1e9fa9e9wf2af3444c9a885ef@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:07:42 -0000 Andy Greenwood wrote: > Seems like the easiest thing to do would be to either get some serial > consoles (or serial console emulators) or provide ssh access to the > box. I was actually thinking of using X.Org. You should be able to get a config files that drives more than one monitor (wether on a multi homed card or on different cards or maybe a mix) and more than one mouse/keyboard (at most one of which might be PS/2 and the others have to be USB). While experimenting, I once got up to having two completely independent screens, but I only had one keyboard and mouse. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:09:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9728716A40D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F3443D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:08:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so326267wra for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:08:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sAqBui8FJPqfYoJsXrZxxCyLs0Yjid9pxAJC2/mG5xPLYCwiJjuMzT5cfBEqYywbbh6NkvN1b/BoXPgFfAdyApi6y+bOQrGTI6jjgzH9VgAYyU7Kk87rSP70IIBlSja8CM8IYTSiwqWdAGypLdO8C9XdwkRyo9iTm19826LAdVQ= Received: by 10.54.148.9 with SMTP id v9mr2360780wrd; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.105.6 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72cf361e0605120608u341e696emff71c8ca7ef1e7ed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:08:58 +0100 From: "Martin Hepworth" To: "Robert Fitzpatrick" In-Reply-To: <1147383319.15954.75.camel@columbus.webtent.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1147383319.15954.75.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Advice on RAID? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:09:00 -0000 Depends on how write heavy the filesystem will be, if it's write heavy then you may find a RAID 5 with 3 disks sucks (esp for a database). On 5/11/06, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > I have looked into and tried FreeBSD 6.0 Vinum and GEOM RAID in our PIII > SCSI 80-pin server with the help of several here on the list. I'm pretty > much going to use GEOM RAID-1 for the system disks using Ralf's doc. I > have room for 3 more disks. Would you recommend using Vinum RAID-5 on > three 73GB drives or using GEOM RAID-1 again on 2 147GB drives? > > If there is no big reason to use either over the other, we've decided to > go for the most space and RAID-5. But the amount of space we would be > gaining is probably less than 50GB, correct? > > Or do you have another solution on our $700 budget. It is a debate here > and would like to get experienced insight. > > Thanks in advance for your time! > -- > Robert > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:18:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9902F16A449 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgeorge.ml@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9E743D67 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:18:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgeorge.ml@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so430279nzf for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:18:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uPhqHOufXYQaaxxal+69ljHLKZ8bHjA9iQRhj45VsLKzVkyHi10SjbDpsMaiV8Y6jdk8N40a2EVjyoDbqL+maSXP7wDOgDs2Hxc1+8DBInjBzp0QFvjT98i5qvbryHIgo2JSpk4Ajl2z+nu/sS0KB3wdO3W+7F8ygueWE3q/KEc= Received: by 10.64.180.19 with SMTP id c19mr1473578qbf; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.51.7 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:48:38 +0530 From: "Siju George" To: "Scott Mitchell" In-Reply-To: <20060512124245.GA30456@llama.fishballoon.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060512124245.GA30456@llama.fishballoon.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bittorrent link for 6.1 does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:18:48 -0000 On 5/12/06, Scott Mitchell wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 05:48:30PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am not subscribed to the list. > > > > The Bittorrent Link on > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/announce.html > > > > doesnot seem to work :-( > > Working fine here (I've downloaded 6.1 over BT twice now). > > How is it not working for you? > Its working now Scott :-) Sorry for the trouble. Kind Regards Siju From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:33:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD35C16A532 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335BB43D70 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:33:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CDXZsB061889; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:33:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <44648EAA.9090607@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:33:30 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Barnaby Scott References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <20060512022532.GA4383@holestein.holy.cow> <4463F9F7.8070009@waywood.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4463F9F7.8070009@waywood.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:33:47 -0000 Barnaby Scott wrote: > Parv wrote: > ... >>> and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5 >>> minutes every time. >> >> Does your screen goes blank just after the above message? If so, >> press [Enter] key, you should see the boot being continued, and >> "login:" waiting for input at the end. > > No the screen still has all the previous clutter on it, and pressing > [Enter] just makes a new line Hmm, it might not be Sendmail, then, though I can't count it out. It might be worth the time it takes to reboot and pick the "verbose" option. Perhaps you can get more information then. What about "safe mode"? Does it boot "quickly"? What does /etc/rc.conf contain? Does /var/run/dmesg.boot have any ominous-looking warning, etc.? Kevin Kinsey -- My cup hath runneth'd over with love. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:35:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516A516A6B4 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751D743D62 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:35:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erikt@owl.midgard.homeip.net) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (83.253.29.241) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.072.1) id 446337DE000510B3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:35:40 +0200 Received: (qmail 96920 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 15:35:39 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 12 May 2006 15:35:39 +0200 Received: (qmail 77091 invoked by uid 1001); 12 May 2006 15:35:39 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:35:39 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Chris Message-ID: <20060512133539.GA77050@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Chris , Kris Kennaway , Kouji Ito , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> <8a0028260605110826h13211353rbe374ccc5f5e7ce4@mail.gmail.com> <20060511175135.GA71742@xor.obsecurity.org> <3aaaa3a0605120556g78e88afn290f25de3ff129eb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0605120556g78e88afn290f25de3ff129eb@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Kouji Ito , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:35:47 -0000 On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:56:43PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 11/05/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote: > >> Are maintenance releases of old branches always released in step with new > >> ones, or is it just coincidence that it's happening this way this time? > > > >It was deliberate this time to avoid an extra ports freeze cycle, > >since that has very high cost and the benefit is really low since the > >intended audience for 5.5 is small and everyone who can do so will be > >much better off with the enormous benefits of 6. > > > >Kris > > > > > > > > Ahh makes sense to me now, since port freezes are annoying. So there > is no danger of 5.5 been released after 5.4 EOL then? Since the 5.4 EOL date has just been extended by several months I would say that it seems exceedingly unlikely that 5.5 will be released after 5.4 is EOL. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:36:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8F216A69C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201A543D69 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:36:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 10096 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 13:36:02 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 May 2006 13:36:02 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4614D28425; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:36:01 -0400 (EDT) To: Peter References: <20060510230414.40064.qmail@web60012.mail.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:36:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060510230414.40064.qmail@web60012.mail.yahoo.com> (Peter's message of "Wed, 10 May 2006 19:04:14 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <44psijl60u.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: dueling ports: pcre and pcre-utf8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:36:12 -0000 Peter writes: > I am having trouble upgrading my ports because my 5.4 system wants to > install both pcre and pcre-utf8 but the ports themselves complain when > they see the other installed. How do I get around this dilemma? Convince the ports to use the same one. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:42:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E3D16A60C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A161643D6D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 6452 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 13:42:04 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 May 2006 13:42:03 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3B26A28425; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:42:02 -0400 (EDT) To: pg@eth1.com References: <20060512002408.24141.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:42:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060512002408.24141.qmail@web32812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Peter G.'s message of "Thu, 11 May 2006 17:24:08 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <44lkt7l5qt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fatal Trap 10: trace trap while in vm86 mode, trying to boot install CD after menu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:42:19 -0000 Peter G writes: > trying to install 6.1 on a bunch of blade servers, P4 > 3.06Ghz w/ 2GB RAM > > SEARCHED THRU ALL THE ARCHIVES AND MAIL LISTS for ANY > similar happenings and there are NO valuable clues.. > > Tried installing Fbsd 6.1, 6.0 and even a hard drive > that had 5.4 pre-installed > > same result always AFTER the boot menu, (picked ACPI > disabled and no diff) > > Fatal Trap 10: trace trap while in vm86 mode > > They ran Linux just fine.. > is there something about Hyperthreading or something > that makes these hang?? > > i also tried to do this in the boot loader prompt > after the boot menu w/ no better results: > set hw.hasbrokenint12=1 > > any clues appreciated as to what i should lookit > next.. What happens when you try "safe" mode? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 13:59:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DCD16A523 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axel.burwitz@arcor.de) Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (mail-in-07.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97B143D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from axel.burwitz@arcor.de) Received: from mail-in-03-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-03-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.15]) by mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B5E168718 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:59:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-03.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.43]) by mail-in-03-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38618279343 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:59:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (dslb-084-058-034-082.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.58.34.82]) (Authenticated sender: axel.burwitz@arcor.de) by mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F223E16E1BE for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:59:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <446494C1.8030808@arcor.de> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:59:29 +0200 From: Axel Burwitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: 6.1-STABLE : make installworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: axel.burwitz@arcor.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:59:39 -0000 Hi, well, need some help... I have just upgraded my system from 6.1-PRERELEASE to 6.1-STABLE, with cvsup, make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel. The upgrade for the basic system went through, it shows 6.1-STABLE version, and the fresh kernel version works, but: when I (in single-user mode) want to start "make installworld" (while being in /usr/src) to upgrade the userland, it only gives " ---- >>> Installing everything ---- cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install ===> share info (install) ===> include (install) Creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh touch not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/src/include. *** Error code 1" No idea what to do now. For any help: thanks in advance! regards Axel -- ********************************************* Axel Burwitz Phone +49 (0) 6021 570717 Mobile +49 (0) 151 15123177 ICQ 339978580 ********************************************* ********************************************* Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5 @ FreeBSD 6.1-PRE ********************************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:00:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2273416A59F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EB043D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 18945 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 13:59:55 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 May 2006 13:59:55 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id BD8F628425; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:59:54 -0400 (EDT) To: "Derrick Ryalls" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:59:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Ryalls's message of "Thu, 11 May 2006 18:38:56 -0700") Message-ID: <44hd3vl4x1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: New folder permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:00:03 -0000 "Derrick Ryalls" writes: > I am having issues getting correct permissions set for files in a > common area on a web/file server. I have webroot shared out via samba > and under there I have an auto-thumbnail generation script that > creates thumbnails in somefolder/.cache where somefolder is a newly > created folder. Example: > > autothumbs\ > mypics1\ > image.jpg > .cache > image_thumb.jpg > mypics2\ > .cache > ... > > What needs to happen is when a new folder is created under this > autothumb tree, the permissions need to be set correctly so that the > .cache folder can be automatically generated by the thumbnail process. > I have the main folder listed as root:wheel 777 but when new folders > are created they have user:wheel 755 permissions and the thumbnail > script fails as it cannot write to the location. > > Is there something I am missing to get this setup properly? I know a > workaround is the manually change the permissions of the folder when > it is created, but since my wife will be wanting to add pictures, that > isn't an option for her (very non-techy). The machine in question a > 5.4-Stable box. > > Any suggestions on what I need to do? There are a lot of ways to do this, but the one I would recommend is to change the main folder to be owned by a group that you, your wife, and the uid running the thumbnail script all are members of -- probably by creating a new group for the purpose. Then if you set your wife's umask to 002, directories she creates will be available to you and any other members of the group. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:08:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932BC16A542 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from queue04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (queue04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F89543D73 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:08:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060512124249.IMUP29343.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:42:49 +0100 Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.101.128.185]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060512124249.DXVX19763.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:42:49 +0100 Received: from scott by llama.fishballoon.org with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FeWyk-0008JO-ST; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:42:46 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:42:46 +0100 From: Scott Mitchell To: Siju George Message-ID: <20060512124245.GA30456@llama.fishballoon.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-SECURITY i386 Sender: Scott Mitchell Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bittorrent link for 6.1 does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:08:21 -0000 On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 05:48:30PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > Hi, > > I am not subscribed to the list. > > The Bittorrent Link on > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/announce.html > > doesnot seem to work :-( Working fine here (I've downloaded 6.1 over BT twice now). How is it not working for you? -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:08:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBF416A60D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:08:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: from mbox1.network-i.net (pop32.network-i.net [212.21.121.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C94543D70 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howie@thingy.com) Received: (qmail 64414 invoked by uid 0); 12 May 2006 14:08:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.134?) (212.21.99.52) by newmail.network-i.net with SMTP; 12 May 2006 14:08:53 -0000 Message-ID: <4464973A.2020102@thingy.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:02 +0100 From: Howard Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Changing from 6.0 to 6.1 ->"'.' to end pause mode" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:08:56 -0000 I've been experimenting with PXE-driven installations in preparation for the arrival of a pile of new servers, and I had a mostly-working setup for FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE when 6.1 was announced this week. I've upgraded to 6.1 on my build system, and have it serving install data and an mfsroot with my own install.cfg in it. It all works fine except that after the target system reboots, and apparently every time it boots, I get this: "" and have to press . to start the boot process proper. Has something changed in the console? The same system was fine with 6.0-RELEASE. One other possibly relevant thing is that my install script does set /boot.config to contain '-p'. Has something happened with keyboard detection that would make the pause mode come on? It seems that this pause mode has been in the console code for a while, although I didn't know about it until now. Thanks in advance for any light anyone can shed... Howie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:16:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B74716A40F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from webmaillogin.com (fr4.webmaillogin.com [216.40.35.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEF643D5A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from [216.240.12.2] (account gpeel@thenetnow.com HELO GRANT) by fr4.webmaillogin.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTPA id 179917555 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:16:06 -0400 Message-ID: <010801c675ce$99aa5eb0$6501a8c0@GRANT> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:15:55 -0400 Organization: The Net Now Internet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Subject: Upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:16:11 -0000 Hi all, I have had complete success with upgrading 6.0 to 6.1rc1 and finally, 6.1 RELEASE. Sorry about asking a question that I am sure has been asked once befor .... Can I upgrade a 4.4, 4.7, 4.10, 5.2.1 boxes the same way using CVSup i.e directly from one of those to 6.1R? TIA, -Grant P.S. I keep complete backups ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:25:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E078616A5DA for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0751943D6E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:24:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [83.216.44.59] (helo=[172.16.0.43]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1FeYZd-000NHT-G4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:24:57 +0200 Message-ID: <44649AE4.5000006@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:25:40 +0200 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: gmirror and partitioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:25:02 -0000 Hello! I would like to install a new FreeBSD 6.1 system on a computer that has two SATA drives. They are the same type. I would like to use gmirror. I read the handbook here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.html But there is something I do not understand. The handbook suggest that I install FreeBSD on only two partitions: a swap and the root fs. But I would like to create many partitions. I think I can do it the following way: 1. Install a basic system on drive /dev/ad0, using two smaller partitions (2GB for swap and 10GB for the root fs). 2. Create the /dev/mirror/gm device on /dev/ad1, as suggested by the handbook 3. When doing 'bsdlabel -wB /dev/mirror/gm0s1', I can allocate gm0s1a and gm0s1b with the same sizes (10GB and 2GB) but I can also add other partitions for /usr, /tmp and /var. Can I? 4. Then I can copy the whole system from ad0s1a to /dev/mirror/gm0s1a, and continue the installation, following the instructions in the handbook 5. Finally, after I added /dev/ad0 to /dev/gm0 and I'm done with synchronization, I would like to format the additional partitions, dump and restore my current /usr, /tmp and /var directories, change my fstab and reboot... Will this work? Sorry for the dumb question, but I have never done this before. The handbook only suggest that I install FreeBSD on one / partition only, but it does not tell how to create new partitions after mirroring. Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:25:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115F516A4A3 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs154.cnf.com (mail-cluster.cnf.com [63.230.177.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B465443D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:25:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs154.cnf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ljcqs154.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7E71C889D; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com (cnfdcx-131-slb-01-in.cnf.com [10.0.108.131]) by ljcqs154.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599981C8745; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com ([10.40.10.68]) by ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 12 May 2006 07:25:36 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:25:26 -0500 Message-ID: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E0439161D@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Upgrading Thread-Index: AcZ1z3v9bOw0f/lQTi6DfGCdzUpy+wAAF8iQ From: "Zimmerman, Eric" To: "Grant Peel" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2006 14:25:37.0248 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0099E00:01C675CF] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: RE: Upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:25:41 -0000 > Can I upgrade a 4.4, 4.7, 4.10, 5.2.1 boxes the same way using CVSup i.e > directly from one of those to 6.1R? >=20 > TIA, >=20 > -Grant >=20 > P.S. I keep complete backups ... >=20 Pretty sure you need to get to at least 5.3 before jumping to 6.x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:35:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E96716A447 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:35:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakki.kudva@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF6643D4C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:35:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bakki.kudva@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so183742nzi for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:35:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L/4NhUC0DirQZIqKd8YQRJ1Z7j7Bo2k5P+6cYRQQ9O3dHxCM8FjrMmlcO2a1oqnegItcBgMoEBCPagR1/nHy3dB+bynipPBORNe2McUJA6Zm/jhOiokUgXbn/VAFh74MPmO5+o3IEe2gOXgv6Ru+cW1Sze/2rlAM3gD9Dy28NZE= Received: by 10.36.148.17 with SMTP id v17mr2524005nzd; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.31.15 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:35:43 -0400 From: "Bakki Kudva" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44648884.7040002@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> <4463666B.5030105@netfence.it> <3ee9ca710605110932u1e9fa9e9wf2af3444c9a885ef@mail.gmail.com> <44648884.7040002@netfence.it> Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:35:45 -0000 How about using x-terminals on a network? I remember seeing them in the surplus market for $15 recently. After all X is designed to be a network gui. -bakki On 5/12/06, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Andy Greenwood wrote: > > Seems like the easiest thing to do would be to either get some serial > > consoles (or serial console emulators) or provide ssh access to the > > box. > > I was actually thinking of using X.Org. > You should be able to get a config files that drives more than one > monitor (wether on a multi homed card or on different cards or maybe a > mix) and more than one mouse/keyboard (at most one of which might be > PS/2 and the others have to be USB). > > While experimenting, I once got up to having two completely independent > screens, but I only had one keyboard and mouse. > > bye > av. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:45:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8467616A632 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633C343D99 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:44:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1FeYsY-0000OV-4s for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:44:30 +0400 Received: from igorr by sysadm.stc with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FeYs5-0000ic-LS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:44:01 +0400 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:44:01 +0400 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512144401.GA2723@sysadm.stc> References: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> <4463666B.5030105@netfence.it> <3ee9ca710605110932u1e9fa9e9wf2af3444c9a885ef@mail.gmail.com> <44648884.7040002@netfence.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Igor Robul X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:45:42 -0000 On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:35:43AM -0400, Bakki Kudva wrote: > How about using x-terminals on a network? I remember seeing them in > the surplus market for $15 recently. After all X is designed to be a > network gui. X-Terminals may 1) Not work good with non-English languages 2) Have bad (<80 Hz) refresh rate Also, for example, I'm not sure I could find any X-Terminal for $15 or even $50 on any market in any country. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:46:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1476316A5E0 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B5F43D86 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:46:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-95-215.51-151.net24.it [151.51.215.95]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CEnj0f079954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:49:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CEjrMU079914 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:46:01 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Subject: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:46:39 -0000 Hello. I've got a i386/6.1 box with only one big root partition. The problem is that, whenever the machine is not properly shutdown, fsck on boot takes eons. First of all: I believe that fsck should run in background, but it doesn't. How can I tell why? Then, back to the heart of the problem, why does it take so long? It's a 9GB SCSI disk and it should be quite fast, although a bit old; it's speed is for sure enough for day to day work. Back in the 5.x times fsck used to last definitely less than 5 minutes. After I upgraded to 6.1 (or maybe after 6.0) it started taking nearly an hour. It just sits there for eons, the disk barely working, and printing a line every minute or so. This regularity makes me think that it might be waiting for something and then just giving up after timeout. *Like* it is trying to syslog, although that deamon has not started yet. This is obviously just an hypotesis, but I thought it might help explain the problem. Any hint? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:46:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA97E16A614 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77EA43D83 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:46:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CEkbsG062436; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:46:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <44649FC8.4000500@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:46:32 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Peel References: <010801c675ce$99aa5eb0$6501a8c0@GRANT> In-Reply-To: <010801c675ce$99aa5eb0$6501a8c0@GRANT> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:47:05 -0000 Grant Peel wrote: > Hi all, > > I have had complete success with upgrading 6.0 to 6.1rc1 and finally, 6.1 > RELEASE. > > Sorry about asking a question that I am sure has been asked once befor .... > > Can I upgrade a 4.4, 4.7, 4.10, 5.2.1 boxes the same way using CVSup i.e > directly from one of those to 6.1R? > Some of those, in fact, *most*, are a pretty big jump. Also, IIRC, all ports needs to be updated. In particular, it's a big jump from 4.X to 5.X; IIRC, you need to do some special magic from 4.11 to 5.X. After that, I'd wanna get to about 5.3/5.4 or so before jumping to 6.1. Then there's the filesystem issue. If you go from 4.X to 6.X directly by means of 2 or more cvsup/buildworld cycles, you can't reformat your disks and use UFS2. Kevin Kinsey > P.S. I keep complete backups ... > Good! -- My Bonnie looked into a gas tank, The height of its contents to see! She lit a small match to assist her, Oh, bring back my Bonnie to me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:50:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AF316A56D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F1343D6E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:50:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k4CEokhn022089 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:50:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:50:46 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:50:48 -0000 This looks like something sed should be able to do, but I haven't had any luck at all. I wanted to remove any whitespace that has accidentally gotten added to the beginning or end of some lines of text. I made a test file that looks like: left justified. lots of spaces. and the best I have done so far is to get rid of about 3 spaces. Attempt 1. #! /usr/bin/sed -f s/ \+//g s/^ //g s/ $//g This looks like it should do the job, but the leading and trailing spaces are still mostly there. I wrote another script. Attempt 2. #! /bin/sh sed 's/^[[:space:]]//g' \ |sed 's/[[:space:]]$//g' If I cat the test file through this script, it also removes one or two spaces, but not all the leading and trailing whitespace I put there. I can write a program in C to do this, but is there a sed script or other native application in FreeBSD that can do this? Thank you. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:52:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF6016A6D0 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from tiltup.nepinc.com (tiltup.nepinc.com [66.207.136.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB6A43D72 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:52:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.97.222] (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by tiltup.nepinc.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4CEvJpL009171 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:57:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <4464A109.9090705@voidmain.net> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:51:53 -0400 From: Tom Grove User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060510) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Jed Tab Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@voidmain.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:52:13 -0000 I updated my system to 6.1 and portupgraded all of my packages. Most things went well but now when I open old files with Jed my tabs are displayed as ^I. Does anyone know how to fix this? -Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:52:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315CF16A741 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFCE43D68 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:52:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k4CEq0mw024959; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:52:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k4CEq0kG024958; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:52:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200605121452.k4CEq0kG024958@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: ml.diespammer@netfence.it (Andrea Venturoli) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:52:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:52:15 -0000 > > Hello. > I've got a i386/6.1 box with only one big root partition. > The problem is that, whenever the machine is not properly shutdown, fsck > on boot takes eons. That is one of the reasons for not making the whole system one big root partition. It will not finish booting until root is cleaned up. The other partitions may be done in background. > > First of all: I believe that fsck should run in background, but it > doesn't. How can I tell why? > > Then, back to the heart of the problem, why does it take so long? It's a > 9GB SCSI disk and it should be quite fast, although a bit old; it's > speed is for sure enough for day to day work. > Back in the 5.x times fsck used to last definitely less than 5 minutes. > After I upgraded to 6.1 (or maybe after 6.0) it started taking nearly an > hour. It just sits there for eons, the disk barely working, and printing > a line every minute or so. I don't know of a reason 6.1 should take longer to fsck than 5.x. ////jerry > This regularity makes me think that it might be waiting for something > and then just giving up after timeout. *Like* it is trying to syslog, > although that deamon has not started yet. This is obviously just an > hypotesis, but I thought it might help explain the problem. > Any hint? > > bye & Thanks > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:58:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B3A16A592 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6794843D5C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:58:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from localhost (monrovll-cuda1-24-53-251-44.pittpa.adelphia.net [24.53.251.44]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:58:24 -0400 id 00056413.4464A290.000178AB Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:58:23 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Andrea Venturoli Message-Id: <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:58:27 -0000 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > I've got a i386/6.1 box with only one big root partition. > The problem is that, whenever the machine is not properly shutdown, fsck > on boot takes eons. > > First of all: I believe that fsck should run in background, but it > doesn't. How can I tell why? >From my desktop: mount /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) /dev/ad0s1d on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/ad0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/ad0s1e on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) Note that / does not have soft-updates, which I believe is the default. AFAIR, fsck can not do background mode unless soft-updates is enabled. That's likely your problem. -- Bill Moran I tore these out of your symbol, and they turned into paper -- but I want to put them back ... River Tam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:04:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B997D16A437 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B8343D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:04:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k4CF3vHQ029267 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 May 2006 18:03:59 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CF68Vt025747; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:06:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4CF687N025746; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:06:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:06:08 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Martin McCormick Message-ID: <20060512150608.GB25497@gothmog.pc> References: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.396, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:04:29 -0000 On 2006-05-12 09:50, Martin McCormick wrote: > This looks like something sed should be able to do, but I > haven't had any luck at all. I wanted to remove any whitespace > that has accidentally gotten added to the beginning or end of > some lines of text. I made a test file that looks like: > > left justified. > lots of spaces. > > and the best I have done so far is to get rid of about 3 spaces. > > Attempt 1. > > #! /usr/bin/sed -f > s/ \+//g > s/^ //g > s/ $//g This fails to remove TAB characters from either the start or the end of a line. > This looks like it should do the job, but the leading and > trailing spaces are still mostly there. > > I wrote another script. Attempt 2. > > #! /bin/sh > > sed 's/^[[:space:]]//g' \ > |sed 's/[[:space:]]$//g' This fails to remove multiple occurences of the [[:space:]] class. There are at least the following ways: sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' file ... perl -pi -e 's/^\s*(\S.*\S)[ \t]*$/$1/' file ... The first one seems more straightforward to me most of the time, but there are times I find Perl's `-pi -e ...' idiom very convenient. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:04:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC6116A5DB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jad@nominet.org.uk) Received: from mx4.nominet.org.uk (mx4.nominet.org.uk [213.248.199.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D382C43D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:04:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jad@nominet.org.uk) Received: from wds1.okna.nominet.org.uk (HELO notes1.nominet.org.uk) ([213.248.197.128]) by mx4.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 12 May 2006 16:04:36 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,122,1146438000"; d="scan'208"; a="3342837:sNHT32297320" In-Reply-To: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> To: NAOD TSIGHE MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.5 November 30, 2005 Message-ID: From: jad@nominet.org.uk Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:04:50 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes1/Nominet(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 05/12/2006 04:04:49 PM, Serialize complete at 05/12/2006 04:04:49 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:04:38 -0000 owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote on 11/05/2006 11:23:53: > Hi, > Is it possible to attach two monitors, 2keybord and 2 > mouse to one PC, by just buying some card that will > connect with a PC. > > I just want to know if it is possible for me to just > buy 1 more monitor, a mouse and a keyboard > so that two students could learn in one pc. and oppen > two different programes at the same time. > I have not played with it yet but you might want to take a look at FreeBSD 6.1. From the 6.1-rc1 announcement (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2006-April/016104.html) "a keyboard multiplexer being added. This is enabled by default via the 'kbdmux' driver and allows multiple keyboards of any type to be plugged in and work at once." Reading the man page for kbdmux it isn't clear to me if the keyboards will work independently in X but it might be worth a try. It looks like this topic has come up a lot. See this post and the link at the end of it http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-October/101408.html . Hope this helps John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:07:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15FB16A40F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4544243D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:07:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B551D5D0B; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:07:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khpcOnJLRuFQ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-160-235-217.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.235.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10A35C60; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:06:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4464A491.5050000@mac.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:06:57 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Venturoli References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:07:01 -0000 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Then, back to the heart of the problem, why does it take so long? It's > a 9GB SCSI disk and it should be quite fast, although a bit old; it's > speed is for sure enough for day to day work. > Back in the 5.x times fsck used to last definitely less than 5 > minutes. After I upgraded to 6.1 (or maybe after 6.0) it started > taking nearly an hour. It just sits there for eons, the disk barely > working, and printing a line every minute or so. This may or may not be a problem with FreeBSD 6.x...have you installed a diagnostic tool like smartmon and run a disk check? If the drive is in the process of failing, you might experience slowdowns like you've described. Can you "dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=64k" [*] OK and at a reasonable speed? Hit Cntl-T every minute or so... -- -Chuck [*]: or whatever device your SCSI drive appears at, if not da0. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:21:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB3E16A723 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bds@waywood.co.uk) Received: from lon-mail-4.gradwell.net (lon-mail-4.gradwell.net [193.111.201.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9806B43D6B for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bds@waywood.co.uk) Received: from [84.12.167.7] ([84.12.167.7] helo=[192.168.1.4] country=GB ident=bds&pop3*waywood$co^uk) by lon-mail-4.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.217) id 4464a803.1612e.eb for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:21:39 +0100 (envelope-sender ) Message-ID: <4464A7E5.7060000@waywood.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:21:09 +0100 From: Barnaby Scott User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <4463C5E4.50109@daleco.biz> <4463D2EC.1020100@waywood.co.uk> <20060512125648.GG5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <20060512125648.GG5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:51 -0000 Daniel Bye wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:12:28AM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote: >> Thanks for your reply. It didn't occur to me to look at the next line - >> I thought it must still be doing the Configuring syscons thing! >> >> Anyway, the next line is: >> >> Initial i386 initialization:. >> >> Armed with this knowledge, I just found this post: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-questions/2004-April/043478.html >> (although I don't know where the rest of the thread went). However it >> doesn't leave me much the wiser! The hostname is mentioned earlier in the >> sequence, so presumably the OS is already aware of that, and as for DNS >> server, what DNS server? > > The fact that the operating system knows what the machine is called, > does not necessarily mean that the name is in the DNS. You can put an > entry in your /etc/hosts file (take a look at the file for the format), > which will allow sendmail and other daemons to start. OK, I looked in /etc/hosts and only 127.0.0.1 localhost appears there. How do I put another entry in here though, when I don't know in advance the IP address that will be allocated to this machine by the DHCP server (provided by my router)? The odd thing is that the system knows exactly what IP address has been assigned, because I can see that transaction taking place during the boot sequence long before the point where it stalls. You should also > check that your hostname is in the DNS. You might find something like > DynDNS or ZoneEdit useful if your machine is on a dynamically assigned > domestic range, such as you'd get from NTL or Telewest. Do I really want it in the DNS? I'm not sure exactly what this means in the context of my little network, but if it means people outside my network being able to look for my computer by name, I certainly don't want that. In case it is important, I should say that during installation I was asked to configure my NIC and that was where I put a hostname, but I *didn't* enter a domain name. Should I have put something here - if so, what? > > As for the DNS server, you need to tell FreeBSD where to go to resolve > names to IP addresses. You do this by putting the IP addresses of your > ISP's name servers in your /etc/resolv.conf (yes, there really is no 'e' > on the end of resolv). The format is 'nameserver IP.add.re.ss', without > the quotes (man 5 resolv.conf will give you more detail). /etc/resolv.conf appears to contain one entry: 'nameserver 192.168.1.1' which is the address of my router. I have never put in the ISP's namesevers before, and yet DNS resolution seems to happen OK! (Presumably when I update or install stuff, the system accesses the relevant FTP servers by name rather than IP address?) You should > also check in /etc/nsswitch.conf to make sure that you have an entry > that looks like this: > > hosts: files dns Yes it does, but with my particular setup, should I actually change this? > > This tells your local resolver library to consult /etc/hosts before it > goes to the DNS. > > If I am teaching Grandma how to suck eggs, I apologise - I got the > impression from the tone of your post, though, that you are quite new > to all this UNIX stuff! Don't worry - this particular Grandma wouldn't know an egg if she swallowed one, and she hasn't sucked anything in years! I am very grateful for all the help I can get. I am hampered by not only being a Unix virgin, but my only network experience is with a small peer to peer network of Windows machines (plus only what I have read). I feel rather like someone who trying to teach himself to fly an advanced fighter jet with nothing but the technical manual. So far I am still trying to operate the ladder to get in the cockpit! I'm determined to get there though. > > HTH > > Dan > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:24:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A326C16A720 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE9A43D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FeZVU-000AeM-Rm by authid for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:24:44 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:24:44 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512152444.GA34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:24:53 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:58:23AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > Andrea Venturoli wrote: >=20 > > Hello. > > I've got a i386/6.1 box with only one big root partition. > > The problem is that, whenever the machine is not properly shutdown, fsc= k=20 > > on boot takes eons. > >=20 > > First of all: I believe that fsck should run in background, but it=20 > > doesn't. How can I tell why? >=20 > >From my desktop: > mount > /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local) > /dev/ad0s1d on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates) > /dev/ad0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates) > /dev/ad0s1e on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) >=20 > Note that / does not have soft-updates, which I believe is the default. > AFAIR, fsck can not do background mode unless soft-updates is enabled. >=20 > That's likely your problem. fsck(8) suggests that any file system required during the boot process is not a valid candidate for background checking. Naturally, there is no file system more important to the boot process than / so it cannot be checked in the background. I'm not sure if softupdates has any bearing on background fscking, but IANAE, and all that. So, as jerry said, it's a Bad Idea to have just one partition, for many reasons, this being among them. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZKi8ixf5fBYiFmoRAtY1AJ95et3AeLYWHoY8fG7myK2BQZdbZQCeIo2j XutlNS5jFIRM3Heh4pxbMRs= =pQIE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:25:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F76B16A58F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (fed1rmmtao02.cox.net [68.230.241.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F5943D4C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:25:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from workdog ([68.5.182.86]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060512152525.QKAT15447.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@workdog>; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:25:25 -0400 From: "Gayn Winters" To: "'User Gandalf'" , Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:25:15 -0700 Organization: Bristol Systems Inc. Message-ID: <002f01c675d8$47c61f30$6501a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 In-Reply-To: <44649AE4.5000006@messias.qhigh.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: gmirror and partitioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:25:30 -0000 > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of User Gandalf > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 7:26 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: gmirror and partitioning > > > > Hello! > > I would like to install a new FreeBSD 6.1 system on a > computer that has > two SATA drives. They are the same type. I would like to use > gmirror. I > read the handbook here: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.ht ml > But there is something I do not understand. The handbook suggest that I > install FreeBSD on only two partitions: a swap and the root fs. But I > would like to create many partitions. I think I can do it the following way: 1. Install a basic system on drive /dev/ad0, using two smaller partitions (2GB for swap and 10GB for the root fs). 2. Create the /dev/mirror/gm device on /dev/ad1, as suggested by the handbook 3. When doing 'bsdlabel -wB /dev/mirror/gm0s1', I can allocate gm0s1a and gm0s1b with the same sizes (10GB and 2GB) but I can also add other partitions for /usr, /tmp and /var. Can I? 4. Then I can copy the whole system from ad0s1a to /dev/mirror/gm0s1a, and continue the installation, following the instructions in the handbook 5. Finally, after I added /dev/ad0 to /dev/gm0 and I'm done with synchronization, I would like to format the additional partitions, dump and restore my current /usr, /tmp and /var directories, change my fstab and reboot... > Will this work? Sorry for the dumb question, but I have never done this > before. The handbook only suggest that I install FreeBSD on one / > partition only, but it does not tell how to create new partitions after > mirroring. > Thanks, > Laszlo Laszlo, You're making gmirror way too difficult. In short, install FreeBSD with however many partitions you want, then install gmirror and replicate your disk to the second disk. The standard howto documents are: http://dannyman.toldme.com/2005/01/24/freebsd-howto-gmirror-system/ http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ I've used Danny's and Ralf's (the first and third). Danny's is simpler, but Ralf's has the advantage that it can be done remotely. Danny's website now recommends Dru's (the second). You may want to try that first. Let us know how it goes, -gayn Bristol Systems Inc. 714/532-6776 www.bristolsystems.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:27:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0F316A74E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F66643D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:27:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB0F5CBF; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:27:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hlf6kkUcnu3B; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:27:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-160-235-217.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.235.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845B45C75; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:27:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4464A94C.6020606@mac.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:27:08 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas References: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20060512150608.GB25497@gothmog.pc> In-Reply-To: <20060512150608.GB25497@gothmog.pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:27:14 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > This fails to remove multiple occurences of the [[:space:]] class. > > There are at least the following ways: > > sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' file ... > perl -pi -e 's/^\s*(\S.*\S)[ \t]*$/$1/' file ... > > The first one seems more straightforward to me most of the time, > but there are times I find Perl's `-pi -e ...' idiom very convenient. > It is, and I wish to acknowledge the above are entirely valid solutions to the problem, but... python -c 'import sys; print sys.stdin.read().strip()' < file... ...has the advantage of being human readable. My old 300-baud accoustic modem used to generate output which in hindsight looks astonishingly close to regex character classes. :-) -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:29:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C6D16A78A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4FB43D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:29:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k4CFTVM6032002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 May 2006 18:29:34 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CFVg0H026068; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:31:42 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4CFVf8m026067; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:31:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:31:41 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20060512153141.GA26040@gothmog.pc> References: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20060512150608.GB25497@gothmog.pc> <4464A94C.6020606@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464A94C.6020606@mac.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.396, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:29:57 -0000 On 2006-05-12 11:27, Chuck Swiger wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> This fails to remove multiple occurences of the [[:space:]] class. >> >> There are at least the following ways: >> >> sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' file ... >> perl -pi -e 's/^\s*(\S.*\S)[ \t]*$/$1/' file ... >> >> The first one seems more straightforward to me most of the time, >> but there are times I find Perl's `-pi -e ...' idiom very convenient. > > It is, and I wish to acknowledge the above are entirely valid solutions > to the problem, but... > > python -c 'import sys; print sys.stdin.read().strip()' < file... > > ...has the advantage of being human readable. My old 300-baud accoustic > modem used to generate output which in hindsight looks astonishingly > close to regex character classes. :-) HEH! I see the joke about Perl being similar to "line noise" is not something local to our Greek IRC channels :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:43:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A665016A614 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pg@eth1.com) Received: from web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84A7543D64 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:42:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pg@eth1.com) Received: (qmail 23119 invoked by uid 60001); 12 May 2006 15:42:55 -0000 Message-ID: <20060512154255.23117.qmail@web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.154.122.198] by web32803.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:42:55 PDT X-RocketYMMF: kjerstes Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:42:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter G To: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org In-Reply-To: <44lkt7l5qt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fatal Trap 10: trace trap while in vm86 mode, trying to boot install CD after menu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pg@eth1.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:43:05 -0000 Thanx for your prompt reply When i try safe mode or any mode... The same effect in ANY mode. i am about to try setting the following at the loader prompt from the boot menu set hw.ata.ata_dma=0 and seeing if thsi helps I do know also taht these blades have a Serverworks chipset and i looked at this exchange from the archives: http://groups.google.com/group/muc.lists.freebsd.stable/browse_frm/thread/bb3484c9f7a282/d7d619bf611e0f64?lnk=st&q=serverworks+install+group%3A*freebsd*&rnum=5&hl=en#d7d619bf611e0f64 The folks in that exchange were able to solve their problems by eliminating their CD drives, I have a USB CDROM that i am attempting to load from when i get the Fatal Trap 10 message,(there is NO option to have a local CD drive here and the BiOS only offers booting fr a USB Floppy or USB CD Drive as THE only options other than fr a local HD inside the blade)... but i also get the same fatal trap error when i transplant a known working IDE HD w/ FBSD 5.4 into 1 of the blades and attempt to boot only from that lone hardrive, so i'm inclined to now look at thsi chipset to see if there is a chipset problem correlation & workaround. There are 5 identical blade servers and they ALL act identically as reproducing thsi error. Thanx for your reply, any input is appreciated. -Peter --- Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Peter G writes: > > > trying to install 6.1 on a bunch of blade servers, > P4 > > 3.06Ghz w/ 2GB RAM > > > > SEARCHED THRU ALL THE ARCHIVES AND MAIL LISTS for > ANY > > similar happenings and there are NO valuable > clues.. > > > > Tried installing Fbsd 6.1, 6.0 and even a hard > drive > > that had 5.4 pre-installed > > > > same result always AFTER the boot menu, (picked > ACPI > > disabled and no diff) > > > > Fatal Trap 10: trace trap while in vm86 mode > > > > They ran Linux just fine.. > > is there something about Hyperthreading or > something > > that makes these hang?? > > > > i also tried to do this in the boot loader prompt > > after the boot menu w/ no better results: > > set hw.hasbrokenint12=1 > > > > any clues appreciated as to what i should lookit > > next.. > > What happens when you try "safe" mode? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:46:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FCC16A509 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243D043D72 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:46:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-95-215.51-151.net24.it [151.51.215.95]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CFnQkS088287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:49:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CFjXtQ090686; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:45:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4464ADA6.8080000@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:45:42 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:46:11 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >> First of all: I believe that fsck should run in background, but it >> doesn't. How can I tell why? > >>From my desktop: > mount > /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local) > > Note that / does not have soft-updates, which I believe is the default. > AFAIR, fsck can not do background mode unless soft-updates is enabled. > > That's likely your problem. > I have turned them on: /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates) As other pointed out, however, / won't be checked in background. This is still ok, for me, given it would take <5 min, as it should and as it did in the past. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:47:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01F516A69C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FF743D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:47:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-95-215.51-151.net24.it [151.51.215.95]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CFofES088464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:50:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CFkmJm090909; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:46:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4464ADF1.20705@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:46:57 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Bye , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20060512152444.GA34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <20060512152444.GA34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:47:21 -0000 Daniel Bye wrote: > So, as jerry said, it's a Bad Idea to have just one partition, for many > reasons, this being among them. Ok, I know that. Still this wasn't the point of my request. I've been answered the first questions, but I'm still wondering on the second one... bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:55:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C7216A6A3 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vampired@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1696843D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:55:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vampired@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so470532nzf for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Jr1auo+L3DINREZRagrR9Nz9r4c4JQDH7BQGUhgZf7MCnaRx34HtMSrOoagxSGdIaPsIPW1DKhtW/OENdAHpZPjAUN9cmUeJfmmF/hS7E2eyBP7kzQjAL8RW6ylLM1i/iK2seut/R3pv6gdB46YhNlrC+wULfAV5yKsyCKWI0A0= Received: by 10.65.206.15 with SMTP id i15mr1700895qbq; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.231.4 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ca8a4870605120855g607c1c9fy41932b0184992fb7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:55:12 -0400 From: "Vampire D" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD HA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:55:14 -0000 I am looking for a solution like linux DRBD for mySQL fail over. It seems most of the solutions for FreeBSD are weak or extremely experimental. Are there any solutions such as DRBD for FreeBSD that can offer more functionality than mySQL replication does? --=20 "Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they look just like the criminal they are playing?" Christopher From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:56:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A6916A458 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from mgedv.at (mail.mgedv.at [195.3.87.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C67943D4C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:56:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@mgedv.net) Received: from metis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mgedv.at (SMTPServer) with ESMTP id 409AD186864; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:55:56 +0200 (MEST) From: "No@SPAM@mgEDV.net" To: "'Giorgos Keramidas'" Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:56:16 +0200 Message-ID: <000d01c675dc$9a36dee0$01010101@avalon.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <4464A94C.6020606@mac.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-index: AcZ12Xuu304OSnp8SBGVO69FlkGpKQAAnlwg Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nospam@mgedv.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:56:22 -0000 > > sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' file ... why not use just (you can change the "-" separator to "/" as above): sed -e 's-^ *--g' -e 's- *$--g' usage examples: -> cat file| sed ... >file1 -> echo $variable| sed ... |grep xy -> if [ "`echo $xy|sed ...`" = "blabla bla" ]; then ... cu... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:56:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B60C16A58F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556EF43D5C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:56:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CFunS7062922; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:56:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4464B03C.8000104@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:56:44 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Barnaby Scott References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <4463C5E4.50109@daleco.biz> <4463D2EC.1020100@waywood.co.uk> <20060512125648.GG5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464A7E5.7060000@waywood.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4464A7E5.7060000@waywood.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:56:52 -0000 Barnaby Scott wrote: >> >> The fact that the operating system knows what the machine is called, >> does not necessarily mean that the name is in the DNS. You can put an >> entry in your /etc/hosts file (take a look at the file for the format), >> which will allow sendmail and other daemons to start. > > OK, I looked in /etc/hosts and only 127.0.0.1 localhost appears there. > How do I put another entry in here though, when I don't know in advance > the IP address that will be allocated to this machine by the DHCP server > (provided by my router)? The odd thing is that the system knows exactly > what IP address has been assigned, because I can see that transaction > taking place during the boot sequence long before the point where it > stalls. > > You should also >> check that your hostname is in the DNS. You might find something like >> DynDNS or ZoneEdit useful if your machine is on a dynamically assigned >> domestic range, such as you'd get from NTL or Telewest. > > Do I really want it in the DNS? I'm not sure exactly what this means in > the context of my little network, but if it means people outside my > network being able to look for my computer by name, I certainly don't > want that. In case it is important, I should say that during > installation I was asked to configure my NIC and that was where I put a > hostname, but I *didn't* enter a domain name. Should I have put > something here - if so, what? > Lack of name resolution can cause several things to be "slow" during booting, but SendMail is the chief culprit. Do you need SendMail? If this is a workstation on a LAN, don't you have another SMTP server available for your mail client? If you don't need sendmail, I'd do this: sendmail_enable="NONE" in /etc/rc.conf, and reboot. Good chance things'll speed up. We are still just shooting in the dark here. Are there no log messages or additional indicators of what the trouble may be? Kevin Kinsey -- Majority, n.: That quality that distinguishes a crime from a law. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:02:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3672B16A717 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BE643D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:02:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from [83.216.44.59] (helo=[172.16.0.43]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1Fea6L-0003x4-3S; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:02:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4464B1D4.60400@freemail.hu> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:03:32 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nagy_L=E1szl=F3_Zsolt?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <002f01c675d8$47c61f30$6501a8c0@workdog> In-Reply-To: <002f01c675d8$47c61f30$6501a8c0@workdog> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: gmirror and partitioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:02:55 -0000 > Laszlo, > > You're making gmirror way too difficult. In short, install FreeBSD with > however many partitions you want, then install gmirror and replicate > your disk to the second disk. > > The standard howto documents are: > > http://dannyman.toldme.com/2005/01/24/freebsd-howto-gmirror-system/ > > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ > > I've used Danny's and Ralf's (the first and third). Danny's is simpler, > but Ralf's has the advantage that it can be done remotely. Danny's > website now recommends Dru's (the second). You may want to try that > first. > > Let us know how it goes, > This looks easy. I'll get the hardware on 19th, but I'll let you know how it goes. Thank you! Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:03:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0C716A49A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:03:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE63443D58 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:03:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k4CG36hn018673 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:03:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200605121603.k4CG36hn018673@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:03:06 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:03:07 -0000 Chuck Swiger quotes and writes: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> This fails to remove multiple occurences of the [[:space:]] class. >> >> There are at least the following ways: >> >> sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' file ... That did it! As soon as I saw the *, I knew what I was not doing. >> perl -pi -e 's/^\s*(\S.*\S)[ \t]*$/$1/' file ... >> >> The first one seems more straightforward to me most of the time, >> but there are times I find Perl's `-pi -e ...' idiom very convenient. >> >It is, and I wish to acknowledge the above are entirely valid solutions >to the problem, but... > > python -c 'import sys; print sys.stdin.read().strip()' < file... > >...has the advantage of being human readable. My old 300-baud accoustic >modem used to generate output which in hindsight looks astonishingly >close to regex character classes. :-) Wow! I'd almost forgotten some of that by-gone era. I had a 1200-baud modem that, in conjunction with the clock slips between our local telephone company and our PBX, used to march [] and various other garbage characters that did look just like regex. You just had to keep re-dialing until you finally got a connection that worked. Thanks to everyone for the help. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:07:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAF316A5A5 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (malcolm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.206.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F12243D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:07:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CG7XXE076505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 May 2006 09:07:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: (from mhunter@localhost) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3/Submit) id k4CG7X2M076504; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:07:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhunter) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:07:33 -0700 From: Mike Hunter To: Andy Reitz Message-ID: <20060512160733.GB75201@malcolm.berkeley.edu> References: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> <20060511215634.GA55038@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060511215634.GA55038@malcolm.berkeley.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (malcolm.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 12 May 2006 09:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Johan Nilsson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp install / base not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:07:38 -0000 > On May 11 at 17:06, "Andy Reitz" wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 May 2006, Johan Nilsson wrote: > > > > > But can you do a ftp-install from an archived version? If, how? > > > > Johan, > > > > While I have never tried this, sysinstall appears to support entering > > non-standard FTP URLs. After you choose the FTP option, you can choose the > > FTP server. The second option in this list is 'URL', which allows you to > > type in any FTP site -- and as I presume, the ftp-archive site will work > > if entered here. > > I will give this a try tomorrow. I was able to install 5.3-RELEASE using this as the specified URL: ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/5.3-RELEASE What bothers me is this verbiage from sysinstall: "Only the Primary sites are guaranteed to carry the full range of possible distributions." I'm ok with having to use an archive ftp server for the crufty distribution I'm trying to install, but don't lie to me and say I don't have to! *sniff* Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:09:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0745716A4C8 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594E543D80 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:09:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E455D4B; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:09:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SDe31XL9jGSe; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:09:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-160-235-217.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.235.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124CD5C5D; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:09:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4464B349.9030306@mac.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:09:45 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas References: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20060512150608.GB25497@gothmog.pc> <4464A94C.6020606@mac.com> <20060512153141.GA26040@gothmog.pc> In-Reply-To: <20060512153141.GA26040@gothmog.pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:09:59 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-05-12 11:27, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >> It is, and I wish to acknowledge the above are entirely valid solutions >> to the problem, but... >> >> python -c 'import sys; print sys.stdin.read().strip()' < file... >> >> ...has the advantage of being human readable. My old 300-baud accoustic >> modem used to generate output which in hindsight looks astonishingly >> close to regex character classes. :-) >> > > HEH! I see the joke about Perl being similar to "line noise" is not > something local to our Greek IRC channels :) Indeed. :) I must confess that it doesn't do in-place replacement of the files, though. I'd have to do a two-liner, I guess: python -c 'import sys,fileinput for line in fileinput.input(inplace=1): print line.strip()' file1 file2 ... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:11:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323D016A61C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:11:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [195.115.46.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF1A43D83 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:11:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B020828B18 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:11:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.4.0 (20060403) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N68sy-hOIF2F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.16.1.201] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512A528B13 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Liste FreeBSD From: bsd Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:11:01 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) Subject: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:11:57 -0000 Hello, I have three partitions on my server and would like to reduce the =20 size of / because I am getting quite full ! Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ar0s1a 3.8G 2.8G 668M 81% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/ar0s1d 60G 1.9G 53G 3% /home What are the places I could start looking in to delete not so usefull =20= files, knowing that I am syncing using portsnat (and previously cvsup). Thks. ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:18:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEBD16A78A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8D643DF2 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:16:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E4F131BB7; Sat, 13 May 2006 01:45:48 +0930 (CST) Received: from eucla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF79D84632; Sat, 13 May 2006 01:45:47 +0930 (CST) Received: by eucla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 73287D5DC5; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:15:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:15:47 -0400 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Igor Robul Message-ID: <20060512161547.GC1396@eucla.lemis.com> References: <20060511102353.89105.qmail@web51712.mail.yahoo.com> <4463666B.5030105@netfence.it> <3ee9ca710605110932u1e9fa9e9wf2af3444c9a885ef@mail.gmail.com> <44648884.7040002@netfence.it> <20060512144401.GA2723@sysadm.stc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060512144401.GA2723@sysadm.stc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:18:10 -0000 --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 12 May 2006 at 18:44:01 +0400, Igor Robul wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:35:43AM -0400, Bakki Kudva wrote: >> How about using x-terminals on a network? I remember seeing them in >> the surplus market for $15 recently. After all X is designed to be a >> network gui. > X-Terminals may > 1) Not work good with non-English languages > 2) Have bad (<80 Hz) refresh rate > > Also, for example, I'm not sure I could find any X-Terminal for $15 or > even $50 on any market in any country. I'm sure you'll find X terminals cheaply from time to time. But in addition to the problems you mention, they're frequently slow, especially by today's standards. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZLSxIubykFB6QiMRAuxGAJ9vhbq2f00nAFzOvnS5DEpJ8TMMbQCgolQD 0rGbeNDDdBDlwf4+ViBHlRY= =xYvh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:18:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54F716A7E1 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFE043D5A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:17:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FeaK9-000BiY-CN by authid for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:17:05 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:17:05 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512161705.GB34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20060512152444.GA34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464ADF1.20705@netfence.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5I6of5zJg18YgZEa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464ADF1.20705@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:18:47 -0000 --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 05:46:57PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Daniel Bye wrote: >=20 > >So, as jerry said, it's a Bad Idea to have just one partition, for many > >reasons, this being among them. >=20 >=20 > Ok, I know that. Still this wasn't the point of my request. I've been=20 > answered the first questions, but I'm still wondering on the second one... Yeah, I realise that. I'm afraid I don't know why fsck should take so long on your disk. Chuck suggested some things you might try, though. It sounds to me like it might be failing hardware, but you need to try some diagnostics, and not take my word for it! Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZLUBixf5fBYiFmoRAiMuAKCdfIAxtoRs4vjl5k1299f76kKvbwCfRPU9 WoU0oLmRhHZT6miwRhBw0ik= =qgj3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:21:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C06416A63A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A84C43D73 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:20:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from localhost (monrovll-cuda1-24-53-251-44.pittpa.adelphia.net [24.53.251.44]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:20:55 -0400 id 00056412.4464B5E7.00018181 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:20:54 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: bsd Message-Id: <20060512122054.77cb6732.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> References: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:21:03 -0000 bsd wrote: > Hello, > > I have three partitions on my server and would like to reduce the > size of / because I am getting quite full ! > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ar0s1a 3.8G 2.8G 668M 81% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/ar0s1d 60G 1.9G 53G 3% /home > > > What are the places I could start looking in to delete not so usefull > files, knowing that I am syncing using portsnat (and previously cvsup). Try installing pkg_cutleaves port and see if it can help you clean up unneeded ports. Also, consider trimming down your log files in /var/log. You can also use the "du -hd1 /" trick to narrow down where all the space is being used. Depending on what's installed on the server, however, I doubt you'll be able to free up much of that space. -- Bill Moran MAL: Hell, this job I would pull for free. ZOE: Can I have your share? MAL: No. ZOE: If you die, can I have your share? MAL: Yes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:27:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D552316A946 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF0843D78 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:27:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-95-215.51-151.net24.it [151.51.215.95]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CGUldj093886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:30:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CGQsuT098230; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:26:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4464B757.7090407@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:27:03 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> <4464A491.5050000@mac.com> <4464B160.5040605@netfence.it> <4464B42C.1040203@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <4464B42C.1040203@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:27:27 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > OK, I agree that this doesn't sound like a hardware problem with the > drive now that you've tested it, but it was at least worth looking at. Ok, thanks for pointing it out, anyway :) >> Just to clarify: running "fsck /" (read-only) in multiuser mode takes >> less than a minute. fsck at boot takes approx. 50 times that long! > > ...and yes, that difference is not reasonable. Are you using bgfsk or > not...? Hm, what do you mean? I'd gladly let my system fsck in background after boot, but it won't do that on a root partition, as mentioned somewhere else on this thread. However, apart from that, I've set everything up according to this wish of mine (i.e. I enabled softupdates and I did not put background_fsck="NO" in my /etc/rc.conf). bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:28:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873A916A864 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [195.115.46.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCB343D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:28:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6446B28B1F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:28:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.4.0 (20060403) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q0Cof0ajhLEG for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:28:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.16.1.201] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0586728B1D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:28:48 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: <20060512122054.77cb6732.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> <20060512122054.77cb6732.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: bsd Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:28:45 +0200 To: Liste FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) Subject: Re: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:28:53 -0000 Hi again, Most of the files that are "large" seems to be located in /usr/ports/=20 distfiles/ What will be the effect of deleting some of these files ? root:abcdef 18:14 ~ # find -x / -size +10000 -print /boot/kernel/kernel /boot/kernel.old/kernel /root/tmp/dcc.tgz /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_5_3_RELEASE /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_5_3_0_RELEASE /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_5_4 /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/ports-all/checkouts.cvs:. /usr/ports/INDEX-5 /usr/ports/distfiles/emacs-21.3.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/gettext-0.13.1.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.7.0-src1.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.7.0-src3.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.8.1-src1.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.8.1-src3.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.8.2-src1.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.8.2-src3.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/bdb/db-4.3.29.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/ezm3/ezm3-1.2-src.tar.bz2 /usr/ports/distfiles/gettext-0.14.1.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/perl-5.8.6.tar.bz2 /usr/ports/distfiles/apache21/httpd-2.1.2-alpha.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/apache21/httpd-2.1.3-alpha.tar.bz2 /usr/ports/distfiles/apache21/httpd-2.1.4-alpha.tar.bz2 /usr/ports/distfiles/python/Python-2.4.tgz /usr/ports/distfiles/python/Python-2.4.1.tgz /usr/ports/distfiles/python/Python-2.4.2.tgz /usr/ports/distfiles/gettext-0.14.4.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/gettext-0.14.5.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/perl-5.8.7.tar.bz2 /usr/ports/distfiles/apache2/httpd-2.0.54.tar.bz2 /usr/ports/distfiles/bind-9.3.2.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/perl-5.8.8.tar.bz2 /usr/ports/distfiles/clamav-0.88.1.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/mysql-4.1.18.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/clamav-0.88.2.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/mysql-4.1.19.tar.gz /usr/ports/INDEX.db /usr/ports/INDEX-5.db /usr/ports/INDEX /usr/ports/INDEX-6 /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/libcc_int.a /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/libcc_int.a /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/kernel /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 /var/db/mysql/ib_logfile0 /var/db/mysql/ib_logfile1 /var/named/var/log/dns.log.0 /var/amavis/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist Thks again. Le 12 mai 06 =E0 18:20, Bill Moran a =E9crit : > bsd wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have three partitions on my server and would like to reduce the >> size of / because I am getting quite full ! >> >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/ar0s1a 3.8G 2.8G 668M 81% / >> devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev >> /dev/ar0s1d 60G 1.9G 53G 3% /home >> >> >> What are the places I could start looking in to delete not so usefull >> files, knowing that I am syncing using portsnat (and previously =20 >> cvsup). > > Try installing pkg_cutleaves port and see if it can help you clean up > unneeded ports. Also, consider trimming down your log files in /=20 > var/log. > > You can also use the "du -hd1 /" trick to narrow down where all the > space is being used. Depending on what's installed on the server, =20 > however, > I doubt you'll be able to free up much of that space. > > --=20 > Bill Moran > > MAL: Hell, this job I would pull for free. > ZOE: Can I have your share? > MAL: No. > ZOE: If you die, can I have your share? > MAL: Yes. > ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:31:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DB116A9B9 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:31:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B4043D69 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:31:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-95-215.51-151.net24.it [151.51.215.95]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CGYsde094454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:35:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CGV13Q098967; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:31:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4464B84E.1060003@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:31:10 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Bye , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> <20060512105823.0ff46f01.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20060512152444.GA34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464ADF1.20705@netfence.it> <20060512161705.GB34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <20060512161705.GB34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:31:35 -0000 Daniel Bye wrote: > Yeah, I realise that. I'm afraid I don't know why fsck should take so > long on your disk. Chuck suggested some things you might try, though. Yeah, sorry, my fault. I intended to answer on the ml, but instead I mailed him privately. > It sounds to me like it might be failing hardware, but you need to try > some diagnostics, and not take my word for it! I had run other tests before, as well as what Chuck suggested: my drive is not failing. Also, fsck in multiuser mode takes 1/50 of what it needs at boot. I've tried putting the thread back on the ml... bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:35:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F30D16A70E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:35:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.200.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE5443D60 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:35:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20060512163543014004r1jae>; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:35:43 +0000 Message-ID: <4464B95D.1040702@computer.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:35:41 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Pros and Cons of running under inetd.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:35:47 -0000 Hello, I run sshd and ftpd on my laptop. I generally start them via: sshd_enable="YES" ftpd_enable="YES" in my rc.conf. What are the pros/cons of running them via inetd? This is in no way a high load or production machine. Just my laptop that I need access to from time to time. The one pro I have noticed (which is rather important to me) is that ftpd does not heed hosts.allow directives when NOT run via inetd. Am I correct in this? I prefer to use tcpwrappers to further protect my sshd and ftpd. I generally keep ftpd firewalled off from the world and when someone needs to (anonymous) ftp something to me I open the firewall. But it would be nice to allow only their IP using hosts.allow (as I just enable/disable a generic ruleset in ipfw). So should I forget to disable the ruleset in ipfw then I am not open all day till I reboot. Thanks. -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:36:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4507116AA70 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872BF43D6E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:36:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E695E28; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:36:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bn6F+Vw8OgLy; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:36:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-160-235-217.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.235.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081A25C60; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:36:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4464B97B.9030906@mac.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:36:11 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Venturoli References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> <4464A491.5050000@mac.com> <4464B160.5040605@netfence.it> <4464B42C.1040203@mac.com> <4464B757.7090407@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4464B757.7090407@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:36:26 -0000 Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>> Just to clarify: running "fsck /" (read-only) in multiuser mode >>> takes less than a minute. fsck at boot takes approx. 50 times that >>> long! >> >> ...and yes, that difference is not reasonable. Are you using bgfsck >> or not...? > > Hm, what do you mean? > I'd gladly let my system fsck in background after boot, but it won't > do that on a root partition, as mentioned somewhere else on this thread. > However, apart from that, I've set everything up according to this > wish of mine (i.e. I enabled softupdates and I did not put > background_fsck="NO" in my /etc/rc.conf). Try turning off background fsck and see whether it does better, the next time the system comes back up after an unclean shutdown. I think bgfsck has some kind of built-in throttling to avoid doing too much I/O, which may not be working quite right in this case, causing it to simply hang out mostly idle rather than finishing the filesystem check. If you have to wait 5-minutes up front rather than sitting with the thing crawling for an hour, maybe that's a better tradeoff...? Either way, it would be interesting to know whether automatic fsck'ing in the foreground procedes at a reasonable speed or not. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:37:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F93016AA1D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2911843D81 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:37:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4CGbIQN022306; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:37:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:36:52 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> <20060512122054.77cb6732.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> In-Reply-To: <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605121236.52992.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:37:24 -0000 On Friday 12 May 2006 12:28, bsd wrote: > Hi again, > > Most of the files that are "large" seems to be located in /usr/ports/ > distfiles/ > > What will be the effect of deleting some of these files ? You will have to download them again if you rebuild / reinstall the packages that use them. Of course, that happens automatically and there's a good chance that you'll need a new version next time you update your installed ports, so go ahead and delete them, especially if you have a good Internet connection. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:38:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3C216AAE5 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from mercureh.reacthosting.com (reacthosting.com [195.177.245.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A899A43D6B for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:38:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from hosta.jigsawfinance.com ([213.106.224.113] helo=alfie.jigsawhq.com) by mercureh.reacthosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FeaeQ-0005Rm-SP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:38:02 +0100 From: Ashley Moran Organization: Codeweavers Ltd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:37:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605121737.33180.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mercureh.reacthosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ashleymoran.me.uk X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Upgrading 6.0 to 6.1 with etcmerge X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:38:08 -0000 I've got a few 6.0-RELEASE machines I want to bring up to date. I want to use etcmerge because mergemaster scares the bejesus out of me. I can create a copy of the standard 6.0-REL /etc using mergemaster, and copying /var/tmp/temproot/src to /var/db/src, that's no problem But I notice /usr/src/UPDATING contains the following: 20060204: The 'audit' group was added to support the new auditing functionality in the base system. Be sure to follow the directions for updating, including the requirement to run mergemaster -p. So I figure after rebooting into single user mode and installing the new world, I have to take an extra step? I never figured out how to deal with the binary password db with etc merge, and I can't see anything in the man page. I hope someone can clear it up. I assume etcmerge is widely used, but it's not been updated (significantly) for so long I'm not sure. (Personally I think it should be in the base system!) Thanks Ashley -- "If you do it the stupid way, you will have to do it again" - Gregory Chudnovsky From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:41:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D51D16A444 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D073843D72 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:41:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CGfYbO014678; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:41:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id k4CGfYvU014675; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:41:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:41:34 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20060512150608.GB25497@gothmog.pc> Message-ID: <20060512102134.J14220@wonkity.com> References: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20060512150608.GB25497@gothmog.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 12 May 2006 10:41:34 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:41:55 -0000 On Fri, 12 May 2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > There are at least the following ways: > > sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' file ... > perl -pi -e 's/^\s*(\S.*\S)[ \t]*$/$1/' file ... > > The first one seems more straightforward to me most of the time, > but there are times I find Perl's `-pi -e ...' idiom very convenient. Neither of those work here: The first sed expression is missing "//". Correcting that: sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*//' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' test.txt sed: lstat: No such file or directory The Perl version shows no difference between the original and processed file. It's complex, too. This one works: perl -pi -le 's/^\s+//; s/\s+$//' test.txt Notes: 1. sed always seems to be a pain. My compliments to those who use it regularly; the only time I use it at all is when Perl (or something else with better handling of regular expressions) is not available. 2. The -l option to perl is needed to preserve line endings. 3. The last version is based on the more efficient way of doing it as per: man -P 'less +/trim' perlop -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:41:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D68916A4ED for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A25B43D78 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:41:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ500A7NVPLG590@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:41:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([80.203.212.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ500CKLVPLG580@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:41:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:41:45 +0200 From: Kyrre Nygard To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060512183937.02190800@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cc: Subject: makeworld FAILURE on 5.4-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:41:56 -0000 Hello ... When doing makeworld, and this is my exact procedure: cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile cd /usr/obj chflags -R noschg rm -rf * cd /usr/src make clean make buildworld (this is where it fails) make buildkernel KERNCONF=NINJA make installkernel KERNCONF=NINJA make installworld mergemaster With this error: ===> usr.sbin/traceroute (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_ROUTE_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_IF_DL_H=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_USLEEP=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H=1 -DHAVE_SETLINEBUF=1 -DHAVE_RAW_OPTIONS=1 -DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN=1 -DHAVE_ICMP_NEXTMTU=1 -DIPSEC -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/../../contrib/traceroute/lbl -c version.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_ROUTE_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_IF_DL_H=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_USLEEP=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H=1 -DHAVE_SETLINEBUF=1 -DHAVE_RAW_OPTIONS=1 -DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN=1 -DHAVE_ICMP_NEXTMTU=1 -DIPSEC -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/../../contrib/traceroute/lbl -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/../../contrib/traceroute/traceroute.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_ROUTE_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_IF_DL_H=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_USLEEP=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H=1 -DHAVE_SETLINEBUF=1 -DHAVE_RAW_OPTIONS=1 -DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN=1 -DHAVE_ICMP_NEXTMTU=1 -DIPSEC -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/../../contrib/traceroute/lbl -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/../../contrib/traceroute/ifaddrlist.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_ROUTE_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_IF_DL_H=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_USLEEP=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H=1 -DHAVE_SETLINEBUF=1 -DHAVE_RAW_OPTIONS=1 -DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN=1 -DHAVE_ICMP_NEXTMTU=1 -DIPSEC -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/../../contrib/traceroute/lbl -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/../../contrib/traceroute/findsaddr-socket.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_ROUTE_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_IF_DL_H=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_USLEEP=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H=1 -DHAVE_SETLINEBUF=1 -DHAVE_RAW_OPTIONS=1 -DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN=1 -DHAVE_ICMP_NEXTMTU=1 -DIPSEC -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/../../contrib/traceroute/lbl -o traceroute version.o traceroute.o ifaddrlist.o findsaddr-socket.o -lipsec traceroute.o(.text+0x7): In function `usage': : undefined reference to `version' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/traceroute. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Does anyone know what I can do to fix it? Thanks, Kyrre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:42:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1529916AABA for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562E643D7C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:42:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from localhost (monrovll-cuda1-24-53-251-44.pittpa.adelphia.net [24.53.251.44]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:41:59 -0400 id 00056410.4464BAD7.000182FB Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:41:58 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: bsd Message-Id: <20060512124158.2b508ccf.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> References: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> <20060512122054.77cb6732.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:42:02 -0000 bsd wrote: > Hi again, > > Most of the files that are "large" seems to be located in /usr/ports/ > distfiles/ > > What will be the effect of deleting some of these files ? If you reinstall those ports, you'll have to download the files again. Unless you have very limited Internet access, cleaning out /usr/ports/distfiles is a pretty safe way to free up space. -- Bill Moran Well, let's see. We killed Simon and River, stole a bunch of medicine, and now the captain and Zoe are off springing the others got snatched by the Feds. Kaylee From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:42:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D2C16AAB8 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7527343D67 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:42:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CGg1gt063253; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:42:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4464BAD4.2060101@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:41:56 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bsd References: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> <20060512122054.77cb6732.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> In-Reply-To: <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:42:04 -0000 bsd wrote: > Hi again, > > Most of the files that are "large" seems to be located in > /usr/ports/distfiles/ > > What will be the effect of deleting some of these files ? > If you need/want to rebuild the ports for the distfiles, they will have to be downloaded again. Many of them may be for outdated ports, so they could be deleted. Of course, once in a while somebody comes looking for old distfiles. What about moving the distfiles to someplace in /home and symlinking? Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:45:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EDB16AC3E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2AC43D66 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CGj6eC014692; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:45:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id k4CGj6YJ014689; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:45:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:45:06 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Barnaby Scott In-Reply-To: <4463F9F7.8070009@waywood.co.uk> Message-ID: <20060512104442.P14220@wonkity.com> References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <20060512022532.GA4383@holestein.holy.cow> <4463F9F7.8070009@waywood.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 12 May 2006 10:45:06 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:08 -0000 On Fri, 12 May 2006, Barnaby Scott wrote: > Parv wrote: > ... >>> and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5 >>> minutes every time. >> >> Does your screen goes blank just after the above message? If so, >> press [Enter] key, you should see the boot being continued, and >> "login:" waiting for input at the end. > > No the screen still has all the previous clutter on it, and pressing [Enter] > just makes a new line Press Ctrl-C instead. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:45:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F0F16AA55 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A7C43D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CGjJh4063290; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:45:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4464BB99.3020203@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:45:13 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Hunter References: <20060511153720.GB42786@malcolm.berkeley.edu> <20060511215634.GA55038@malcolm.berkeley.edu> <20060512160733.GB75201@malcolm.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060512160733.GB75201@malcolm.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ftp install / base not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:29 -0000 Mike Hunter wrote: > > I was able to install 5.3-RELEASE using this as the specified URL: > > ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/5.3-RELEASE > Good to know that! This one goes in the "save" folder! > What bothers me is this verbiage from sysinstall: > > "Only the Primary sites are guaranteed to carry the full range of possible > distributions." > > I'm ok with having to use an archive ftp server for the crufty > distribution I'm trying to install, but don't lie to me and say I don't > have to! *sniff* Heh, now we have to define "possible"? ;-) KDK -- A prig is a fellow who is always making you a present of his opinions. -- George Eliot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:45:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943DF16AA85 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C17D43D69 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ500ANYVW3G590@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:45:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([80.203.212.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ500C93VW2G590@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:45:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:45:39 +0200 From: Kyrre Nygard In-reply-to: <20060510163646.GE20941@ayvali.org> To: "N.J. Thomas" Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060512184519.021b0c50@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060510172936.021f1e30@broadpark.no> <7.0.1.0.2.20060510181801.02200c70@broadpark.no> <20060510163646.GE20941@ayvali.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_userdb.so: Where is it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:42 -0000 At 18:36 10.05.2006, N.J. Thomas wrote: >* Kyrre Nygard [2006-05-10 18:18:23 +0200]: > > > > Does anybody know where pam_userdb.so has gone? > > > > > > FreeBSD doesn't appear to have ever had it, so it hasn't "gone" > > > anywhere. The thread you linked to below suggests exactly that. > > > > > > > > > You could download the source and try and build it. > > > > That's a real good advice. I'll see what I can do with it ... > >Kyrre, > >More info for you, digging through the archives came up with this: > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-April/117922.html > >Quoting: > > > > There's no pam_userdb.so available for FreeBSD. You could use > > > pam_pwdfile.so, which is in the ports-collection. Users are > > > added/changed e.g. through htpasswd. Works well if you have not a lot of > > > accounts. > > > > > > a simple vsftpd.pam could look like this: > > > > > > auth required /usr/local/lib/pam_pwdfile.so pwdfile /etc/vsftpd_login > > > account required /usr/lib/pam_permit.so > > > > > > Just to let you know that worked a treat > >hth, >Thomas > >-- >N.J. Thomas >njt@ayvali.org >Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo >_______________________________________________ Thank you so much man. This worked wonders for me :) All the best, Kyrre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:46:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E79A16ABA8 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D2E43D70 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:46:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so212821nzi for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:46:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:to:subject:content-type:mime-version:references:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=qf7LEwdd5IgnqcVYC3Ad8qNYIEpiNtdvqhaMhzC/LAWcr/uOyuEyP/EVWsSWAi7SErNvjKXw1dyMv8Dgs4dwOVMtspJmUpE4KCL9N5vwxP3lRfK+hZYV9U1jxrLfh4weBmQGJ0b/1y6pisZvB9JPf16FZ+0QuZIaAOSGoVyoWxc= Received: by 10.36.68.4 with SMTP id q4mr2729855nza; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carpetsmoker.ictwerkplaats.org ( [80.126.94.163]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 7sm12137492nzn.2006.05.12.09.46.44; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:45:20 -0000 To: bsd , "Liste FreeBSD" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> <20060512122054.77cb6732.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.00 (FreeBSD) From: Martin Tournoy Cc: Subject: Re: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:46:51 -0000 the /usr/ports/distfiles dir are the source files you downloaded while installing ports. You can safly empty the whole directory You can delete /boot/kernel.old if the new kernel is working /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs can be safly deleted /usr/ports/INDEX-5 can be deleted, it is used for searching ports (make search name=) and some portmanagers, yopu might want to keep it... You can delete /usr/obj You might want to delete /usr/src, if your not planning to update often that is... If you don't install/upgrade alot of ports, you can delete the ports tree On Fri, 12 May 2006 16:28:45 -0000, bsd wrote: > Hi again, > > Most of the files that are "large" seems to be located in /usr/ports/ > distfiles/ > > What will be the effect of deleting some of these files ? > > > > root:abcdef 18:14 ~ # find -x / -size +10000 -print > /boot/kernel/kernel > /boot/kernel.old/kernel > /root/tmp/dcc.tgz > /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_5_3_RELEASE > /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_5_3_0_RELEASE > /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_5_4 > /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup/ports-all/checkouts.cvs:. > /usr/ports/INDEX-5 > /usr/ports/distfiles/emacs-21.3.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/gettext-0.13.1.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.7.0-src1.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.7.0-src3.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.8.1-src1.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.8.1-src3.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.8.2-src1.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/X11R6.8.2-src3.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/bdb/db-4.3.29.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/ezm3/ezm3-1.2-src.tar.bz2 > /usr/ports/distfiles/gettext-0.14.1.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/perl-5.8.6.tar.bz2 > /usr/ports/distfiles/apache21/httpd-2.1.2-alpha.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/apache21/httpd-2.1.3-alpha.tar.bz2 > /usr/ports/distfiles/apache21/httpd-2.1.4-alpha.tar.bz2 > /usr/ports/distfiles/python/Python-2.4.tgz > /usr/ports/distfiles/python/Python-2.4.1.tgz > /usr/ports/distfiles/python/Python-2.4.2.tgz > /usr/ports/distfiles/gettext-0.14.4.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/gettext-0.14.5.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/perl-5.8.7.tar.bz2 > /usr/ports/distfiles/apache2/httpd-2.0.54.tar.bz2 > /usr/ports/distfiles/bind-9.3.2.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/perl-5.8.8.tar.bz2 > /usr/ports/distfiles/clamav-0.88.1.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/mysql-4.1.18.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/clamav-0.88.2.tar.gz > /usr/ports/distfiles/mysql-4.1.19.tar.gz > /usr/ports/INDEX.db > /usr/ports/INDEX-5.db > /usr/ports/INDEX > /usr/ports/INDEX-6 > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/libcc_int.a > /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/libcc_int.a > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/kernel > /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db > /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 > /var/db/mysql/ib_logfile0 > /var/db/mysql/ib_logfile1 > /var/named/var/log/dns.log.0 > /var/amavis/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist > > > Thks again. > > > Le 12 mai 06 à 18:20, Bill Moran a écrit : > >> bsd wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have three partitions on my server and would like to reduce the >>> size of / because I am getting quite full ! >>> >>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >>> /dev/ar0s1a 3.8G 2.8G 668M 81% / >>> devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev >>> /dev/ar0s1d 60G 1.9G 53G 3% /home >>> >>> >>> What are the places I could start looking in to delete not so usefull >>> files, knowing that I am syncing using portsnat (and previously cvsup). >> >> Try installing pkg_cutleaves port and see if it can help you clean up >> unneeded ports. Also, consider trimming down your log files in / >> var/log. >> >> You can also use the "du -hd1 /" trick to narrow down where all the >> space is being used. Depending on what's installed on the server, >> however, >> I doubt you'll be able to free up much of that space. >> >> --Bill Moran >> >> MAL: Hell, this job I would pull for free. >> ZOE: Can I have your share? >> MAL: No. >> ZOE: If you die, can I have your share? >> MAL: Yes. >> > > ________________________________________________ > «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?Ȥ > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD > bsd @at@ todoo.biz > ________________________________________________ > «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?Ȥ > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:51:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B3D16AB74 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F6F43D6D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:51:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ500AXXW5UG690@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:51:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([80.203.212.30]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ500CHWW5TGH90@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:51:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:51:30 +0200 From: Kyrre Nygard In-reply-to: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060512184738.022275a8@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Cc: Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:51:32 -0000 At 16:50 12.05.2006, Martin McCormick wrote: > This looks like something sed should be able to do, but I >haven't had any luck at all. I wanted to remove any whitespace >that has accidentally gotten added to the beginning or end of >some lines of text. I made a test file that looks like: > >left justified. > lots of spaces. > >and the best I have done so far is to get rid of about 3 spaces. > >Attempt 1. > >#! /usr/bin/sed -f >s/ \+//g >s/^ //g >s/ $//g > > This looks like it should do the job, but the leading and >trailing spaces are still mostly there. > > I wrote another script. Attempt 2. > >#! /bin/sh > >sed 's/^[[:space:]]//g' \ >|sed 's/[[:space:]]$//g' > > If I cat the test file through this script, it also >removes one or two spaces, but not all the leading and trailing >whitespace I put there. I can write a program in C to do this, >but is there a sed script or other native application in FreeBSD that >can do this? > > Thank you. > >Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK >Systems Engineer >OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group What's up man? Here's a script I use to remove trailing whitespace. It also reduces two or more empty lines like this: -- -- To just one: -- -- And it converts ASCII files to UNIX format (that is without ^M). Then for pretty sake, it adds an empty line to the end of each file. -- #!/usr/local/bin/bash # # Remove CRLF, trailing whitespace and double lining. # $MERHABA: ascii_clean.sh,v 1.0 2007/11/11 15:09:05 kyrre Exp $ # for file in `find -s . -type f`; do if file -b $file | grep -q 'text'; then echo >> $file tr -d '\r' < $file | cat -s | sed -E -e 's/[[:space:]]+$//' > $file.tmp mv -f $file.tmp $file echo "$file: Done" fi done -- I'd be interested in knowing if you manage to improve this script. Take care, Kyrre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:58:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB51416A53A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:58:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C9B43D66 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:58:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-102-190.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.102.190]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 May 2006 12:59:07 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,122,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="202960662:sNHT3301459962" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17508.48487.502992.913521@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:52:55 -0400 To: bsd In-Reply-To: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> References: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta26) "endive" XEmacs Lucid Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:58:27 -0000 bsd writes: > I have three partitions on my server and would like to reduce the > size of / because I am getting quite full ! > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ar0s1a 3.8G 2.8G 668M 81% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/ar0s1d 60G 1.9G 53G 3% /home > > What are the places I could start looking in to delete not so > usefull files, knowing that I am syncing using portsnat (and > previously cvsup). Try this: du -x / | sort -nr | head -n 50 Look for anything that's bigger than it ought to be. (I run variations of that on each filesystem daily; at this point I know what should be there, and if something changes I ask "Why?".) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:58:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DACC16AE29 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BCB43D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:58:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k4CGwfvk004609 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:58:44 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CH0qW5026745 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:00:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4CH0qqP026744 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:00:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:00:52 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512170052.GD26040@gothmog.pc> References: <4464A94C.6020606@mac.com> <000d01c675dc$9a36dee0$01010101@avalon.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000d01c675dc$9a36dee0$01010101@avalon.lan> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.397, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:58:57 -0000 On 2006-05-12 17:56, "No@SPAM@mgEDV.net" wrote: >>> sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' file ... > > why not use just (you can change the "-" separator to "/" as above): > sed -e 's-^ *--g' -e 's- *$--g' Because this provides no additional help with the problem of not matching TABS and it looks very confusing so close to `-e' and other command-line options. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 17:02:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id AF73C16A71E; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060512170200.AF73C16A71E@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 17:02:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id B702816AC52; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060512170200.B702816AC52@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:02:00 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 17:02:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A5616ADB2 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3797743D60 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:02:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k4CH1tkc004750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 May 2006 20:02:01 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CH467v026772; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:04:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4CH46UP026771; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:04:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:04:06 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20060512170406.GE26040@gothmog.pc> References: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20060512150608.GB25497@gothmog.pc> <20060512102134.J14220@wonkity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060512102134.J14220@wonkity.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.397, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:02:34 -0000 On 2006-05-12 10:41, Warren Block wrote: >On Fri, 12 May 2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> There are at least the following ways: >> >> sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' file ... >> perl -pi -e 's/^\s*(\S.*\S)[ \t]*$/$1/' file ... >> >> The first one seems more straightforward to me most of the >> time, but there are times I find Perl's `-pi -e ...' idiom >> very convenient. > > Neither of those work here: > > The first sed expression is missing "//". Correcting that: > sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*//' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' test.txt > sed: lstat: No such file or directory Yeah, I noticed the missing // in the first regexp, but only after I had posted the message. You're right, of course :) It seems odd that the fixed expression doesn't work though. Which version of FreeBSD is this and what sed are you running? $ uname -v $ type sed > The Perl version shows no difference between the original and > processed file. It's complex, too. This one works: > > perl -pi -le 's/^\s+//; s/\s+$//' test.txt > > Notes: > 1. sed always seems to be a pain. My compliments to those who use it > regularly; the only time I use it at all is when Perl (or something > else with better handling of regular expressions) is not available. > 2. The -l option to perl is needed to preserve line endings. > 3. The last version is based on the more efficient way of doing it as > per: man -P 'less +/trim' perlop Great! Thanks for all the useful tips :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 17:06:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019A916ACD7 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:06:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68FA843D6D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:06:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 6288 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2006 17:06:48 -0000 Received: from 204-8-12-66.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (ldg%tls.net@204.8.12.66) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 12 May 2006 17:06:48 -0000 Message-ID: <4464C09E.1020600@pixelhammer.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:06:38 -0400 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <446259C5.5070709@odots.org> In-Reply-To: <446259C5.5070709@odots.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Promise SATA controller / Maxtor drive problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:06:52 -0000 Øyvind Skaar wrote: >>> The drive in question is a Maxtor 6B200M0. > >> These were Maxtor 6Y080M0 and 6Y160MO drives. Running under onboard >> SATA or Highpoint Rocket Raid cards > >> The Maxtor drives were problematic for us from the start, and not even >> heavy enough to make good door stops. > > So your no big Maxtor fan then? :) The platters make great clocks, and the drives do a great job of keeping the packing material from shifting around during shipment ;^) > Do you think the drives had compatibility problems with the > controller(s)? Or maybe a driver issue? Kind of hard to believe that so > many drives are just faulty.. At first we suspected controller issues but the same controller and OS has no problems with Seagate drives. I had googled the errors and came up with some possible issues with the drivers/kernel, upgrades to the OS did not solve the problems. I suspect that while SATA technology might be good, most SATA drives being manufactured are more suited to home users and gamers as "gee whiz I have SATA drives!" products. When confronted with a heavily loaded mail server they simply are not up to the task. Future servers have been ordered with SCSI drives using Adaptec cards or Perc onboard controllers. No further incidents. I have one other server going online with SATA, but it is an old Dell purchased dirt cheap with IBM SATA drives running gmirror. Load testing showed now problems after running several days. If it dies I'll put in a SCSI card and real HDDs. > > Btw, I used this drive with 5.4 release (It think) on another > controller, but It was one of those cheap Sil controllers, and I got the > usual* problems. > > > Anyone know what these checks refer to? >> ad4: Maxtor 6B200M0 BANC1B70 >> ad4: 398297088 sectors [395136C/16H/63S] 16 sectors/intrupts 1 depth >> queue >> ad4: Promise check1 failed >> ad4: Adaptec check1 failed >> ad4: LSI (v3) check1 failed >> ad4: LSI (v2) check1 failed >> ad4: FreeBSD check1 failed >> GEOM: new disk ad4 Never seen it, but it sticks in my mind that disabling ACPI will help. Not sure where I read that. Try googling the error. DAve -- This message was checked by forty monkeys and found to not contain any SPAM whatsoever. Your monkeys may vary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 17:11:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0354816A75D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from justnosweat.net (justnosweat.net [80.126.252.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBB743D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from justnosweat.net (localhost.justnosweat.net [127.0.0.1]) by justnosweat.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CHC510057281 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:12:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from localhost (justins@localhost) by justnosweat.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id k4CHC5oW057278 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:12:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:12:04 +0200 (CEST) From: justin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512185626.D57174@justnosweat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: hello X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:11:34 -0000 I `ve got a question about installing the php5 module. I`m installing it from the /usr/ports/www/php5-session port. Everything runs ok and it seems like the module is installed. There is only one problem, in the httpd.conf there is a LoadModule php5_module refering to libexec/apache/libphp5.so. The library libphp5.so is not made by the install and so my appache will not start with the php5 enabled. What is wrong and what can i do to let the install make the libphp5.so. Ok thanks in advance, Justin. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 17:15:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1968416A51D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from svr85.edns1.com (svr85.edns1.com [67.15.56.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3A243D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:15:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from cpanel by svr85.edns1.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1FebEM-0000iM-Qo; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:15:10 -0700 Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1]) by www.averageadmins.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:15:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20060512101510.z2k66mhqz1d1c4cw@www.averageadmins.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:15:10 -0700 From: jeff.cross@averageadmins.com To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.1) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr85.edns1.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32001 503] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - averageadmins.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: jeff.cross@averageadmins.com Subject: Upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:15:17 -0000 This has possibly been discussed a number of times, and if it has, I =20 apologize. Here is my situation: I would like to upgrade my existing 6.0-SECURITY system to 6.1-RELEASE =20 and continue using freebsd-update to keep my system on the up and up. =20 I read through the upgrade instructions on disk #1 of the 6.1 release =20 CD and wondered if that would be the easiest way to upgrade? From what I read, all of the configuration files for 6.1 would be in =20 the /etc/upgrade folder. Would they have to stay there? Would 6.1, =20 from this point forward, always have the /etc folder in /etc/upgrade? =20 Do I copy new pieces back to /etc for the production system? I read =20 about merging but does it merge from /etc to /etc/upgrade? Is another scenario to do the cvsup method and go that route? If I =20 did, would I be able to use freebsd-update from that point forward or =20 would I be limited to only using the cvsup method? I know both require merging config files and what not, which makes me =20 a little nervous, but I would like the easiest method available. I =20 love using FreeBSD and use it primarily on my laptop so compiling the =20 entire OS on there may take a while so obviously the binary upgrade =20 looks good. I am just unsure about the /etc/upgrade folder and how I =20 get all of that back to /etc. I am somewhat a "noobert" in FreeBSD... I have been using it for less =20 than a year and really enjoy it over my past Linux experiences. =20 However, things like this make me nervous. This is my first upgrade =20 of a machine I use *all* the time. Thanks in advance! Jeff Cross http://www.averageadmins.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 17:15:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F52716A54F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B027D43D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:15:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FebES-000Cqt-54 by authid for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:15:16 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:15:15 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20060512171515.GC34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <4464B95D.1040702@computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464B95D.1040702@computer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of running under inetd.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:15:18 -0000 --RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I run sshd and ftpd on my laptop. I generally start them via: > sshd_enable=3D"YES" > ftpd_enable=3D"YES" > in my rc.conf. >=20 > What are the pros/cons of running them via inetd? >=20 > This is in no way a high load or production machine. Just my laptop > that I need access to from time to time. >=20 > The one pro I have noticed (which is rather important to me) is that > ftpd does not heed hosts.allow directives when NOT run via inetd. Am I > correct in this? I prefer to use tcpwrappers to further protect my sshd= =20 > and ftpd. I generally keep ftpd firewalled off from the world and when= =20 > someone needs to (anonymous) ftp something to me I open the firewall.=20 > But it would be nice to allow only their IP using hosts.allow (as I just= =20 > enable/disable a generic ruleset in ipfw). So should I forget to=20 > disable the ruleset in ipfw then I am not open all day till I reboot. When sshd starts, it needs to generate keys and set up its cryptographic environment, so you will notice a bit of lag before getting a login prompt. This may or may not mean anything to you, depending on how beefy your laptop is. Check man sshd for the -i option. sshd should, by default, be compiled with tcpwrappers support anyway. You can test whether this is the case by putting something like this at the top of your hosts.allow: sshd : 127.0.0.1 : deny and then try connecting on the loopback interface. If you see `refused connect from localhost' in your /var/log/auth.log, then your sshd uses hosts.allow and running it from inetd won't give you any benefit. I don't know about ftpd, as I don't use it. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZMKiixf5fBYiFmoRAunjAJ4yI2t7asNt6x0LzmODryxsh6hUKwCdGXyK DDc8cF18SQTicBkosY2aW4Q= =A1Ol -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 17:34:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA36416AF54 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:34:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C39A43DE6 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:33:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l1so493651nzf for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Otij4L1So8I121sa5IGM8uHYOJFmGmx9TCHl3DVYfuMggEMCdkGaBMq5n9OO1NDjn7C2ahnKO80MtI38ynjNKVeXbQSni3oahWwO6M9KPNuJlg5XSpvYYWTEyTUBB6XCG5h6OUHjBciNWyJT82XMhifL+XqmJHroz5gcR3EauR4= Received: by 10.64.88.11 with SMTP id l11mr2742209qbb; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.150.9 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:20 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: using rc scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:34:08 -0000 I wrote an rc script for cfengine, but it's not recording the pid. Am I doing something obviously wrong, or does rc rely on the app to provide the pid? -- #!/bin/sh # # PROVIDE: cfexecd # REQUIRE: LOGIN # BEFORE: securelevel # KEYWORD: FreeBSD shutdown . "/etc/rc.subr" name=3D"cfexecd" rcvar=3D`set_rcvar` command=3D"/usr/local/sbin/cfexecd" command_args=3D"" pidfile=3D"/var/run/$name.pid" #required_files=3D"/usr/local/etc/$name.conf" # read configuration and set defaults load_rc_config "$name" : ${cfexecd_enable=3D"NO"} : ${cfexecd_flags=3D""} run_rc_command "$1" --=20 -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 17:56:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FA616AB22 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377D043D6B for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:56:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FebsJ-000DfY-7p by authid for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:56:27 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:56:27 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512175626.GD34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <4463C5E4.50109@daleco.biz> <4463D2EC.1020100@waywood.co.uk> <20060512125648.GG5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464A7E5.7060000@waywood.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464A7E5.7060000@waywood.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:56:33 -0000 --Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote: > >The fact that the operating system knows what the machine is called, > >does not necessarily mean that the name is in the DNS. You can put an > >entry in your /etc/hosts file (take a look at the file for the format), > >which will allow sendmail and other daemons to start. >=20 > OK, I looked in /etc/hosts and only 127.0.0.1 localhost appears there.=20 > How do I put another entry in here though, when I don't know in advance= =20 > the IP address that will be allocated to this machine by the DHCP server= =20 > (provided by my router)? The odd thing is that the system knows exactly= =20 > what IP address has been assigned, because I can see that transaction=20 > taking place during the boot sequence long before the point where it=20 > stalls. You can possibly configure your router to give you the same IP address each time you make a DHCP lease request, by setting up `static' leases. You could also manually configure an IP address, and add that address to the list of IPs excluded from your router's dynamic address pool. How to do so will depend on your router. You can then, with either of these approaches, put an entry in /etc/hosts and it should work. >=20 > You should also > >check that your hostname is in the DNS. You might find something like > >DynDNS or ZoneEdit useful if your machine is on a dynamically assigned > >domestic range, such as you'd get from NTL or Telewest. >=20 > Do I really want it in the DNS? I'm not sure exactly what this means in= =20 > the context of my little network, but if it means people outside my=20 > network being able to look for my computer by name, I certainly don't=20 > want that. In case it is important, I should say that during=20 > installation I was asked to configure my NIC and that was where I put a= =20 > hostname, but I *didn't* enter a domain name. Should I have put=20 > something here - if so, what? Not necessarily, but as KDK has said, not having a name in DNS (or in /etc/hosts) can cause some daemons to wait while their DNS lookup timeout limit expires. And, as KDK said, it's often sendmail that seems to wait. And wait... ;-) You can certainly manage without public DNS records, but if you need to run sendmail, you should certainly make a new entry in /etc/hosts. >=20 > > > >As for the DNS server, you need to tell FreeBSD where to go to resolve > >names to IP addresses. You do this by putting the IP addresses of your > >ISP's name servers in your /etc/resolv.conf (yes, there really is no 'e' > >on the end of resolv). The format is 'nameserver IP.add.re.ss', without > >the quotes (man 5 resolv.conf will give you more detail). >=20 > /etc/resolv.conf appears to contain one entry: > 'nameserver 192.168.1.1' > which is the address of my router. I have never put in the ISP's=20 > namesevers before, and yet DNS resolution seems to happen OK!=20 > (Presumably when I update or install stuff, the system accesses the=20 > relevant FTP servers by name rather than IP address?) Ah, OK. Then your dhclient is correctly requesting and getting its resolver address. If it is indeed sendmail that causes the delay, then you may want to disable it. Someone has already suggested booting with verbose logging turned on (an option at the boot menu), which should give you more idea of what's causing the delay. Let us know what's going on if you can't figure it out. >=20 > You should > >also check in /etc/nsswitch.conf to make sure that you have an entry > >that looks like this: > > > >hosts: files dns >=20 > Yes it does, but with my particular setup, should I actually change this? No, leave it as it is. You still want to check /etc/hosts before going to the DNS. >=20 > > > >This tells your local resolver library to consult /etc/hosts before it > >goes to the DNS. > > > >If I am teaching Grandma how to suck eggs, I apologise - I got the > >impression from the tone of your post, though, that you are quite new=20 > >to all this UNIX stuff! >=20 > Don't worry - this particular Grandma wouldn't know an egg if she=20 > swallowed one, and she hasn't sucked anything in years! Heheh! Interesting imagery. Thanks... Need soap... > I am very > grateful for all the help I can get. I am hampered by not only being a=20 > Unix virgin, but my only network experience is with a small peer to peer= =20 > network of Windows machines (plus only what I have read). I feel rather= =20 > like someone who trying to teach himself to fly an advanced fighter jet= =20 > with nothing but the technical manual. So far I am still trying to=20 > operate the ladder to get in the cockpit! I'm determined to get there > though. IMHO, you picked a fine OS for your UNIX initiation, in part because of its technical excellence, and in part because of the wonderful support you get from the community. If you are resourceful, and can demonstrate an ability to try and fix things yourself, you will find most people round here very helpful. Welcome aboard! Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZMxKixf5fBYiFmoRApxoAKDbu57aFDC+ECa8iJhi7F+91BHm8QCfQOot lq9T/T7BKZmSdascdjdlSKY= =nUZ9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 18:07:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257E616B21B for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.192.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9020B43D5F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:07:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20060512180722m12003acqae>; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:07:22 +0000 Message-ID: <4464CEDA.80906@computer.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:07:22 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <4464B95D.1040702@computer.org> <20060512171515.GC34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <20060512171515.GC34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of running under inetd.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:07:27 -0000 Daniel Bye wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I run sshd and ftpd on my laptop. I generally start them via: >> sshd_enable="YES" >> ftpd_enable="YES" >> in my rc.conf. >> >> What are the pros/cons of running them via inetd? >> >> This is in no way a high load or production machine. Just my laptop >> that I need access to from time to time. >> >> The one pro I have noticed (which is rather important to me) is that >> ftpd does not heed hosts.allow directives when NOT run via inetd. Am I >> correct in this? I prefer to use tcpwrappers to further protect my sshd >> and ftpd. I generally keep ftpd firewalled off from the world and when >> someone needs to (anonymous) ftp something to me I open the firewall. >> But it would be nice to allow only their IP using hosts.allow (as I just >> enable/disable a generic ruleset in ipfw). So should I forget to >> disable the ruleset in ipfw then I am not open all day till I reboot. > Thanks for the response. > When sshd starts, it needs to generate keys and set up its cryptographic > environment, so you will notice a bit of lag before getting a login > prompt. This may or may not mean anything to you, depending on how > beefy your laptop is. > > Check man sshd for the -i option. > > sshd should, by default, be compiled with tcpwrappers support anyway. > You can test whether this is the case by putting something like this at > the top of your hosts.allow: > > sshd : 127.0.0.1 : deny > > and then try connecting on the loopback interface. If you see `refused > connect from localhost' in your /var/log/auth.log, then your sshd uses > hosts.allow and running it from inetd won't give you any benefit. > Actually I have sshd under control. It works fine, and yes uses tcpwrappers by default. > I don't know about ftpd, as I don't use it. ftpd however does not seem to use them. > > Dan > Although I am curious about ftpd and tcpwrappers.... I am also interested in whether or not running these daemons under inetd is preferred or not. If so why? If not, why? -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 18:10:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FC816B267 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8731343D6D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4CI9AXK030713; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:09:11 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, axel.burwitz@arcor.de Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:09:55 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <446494C1.8030808@arcor.de> In-Reply-To: <446494C1.8030808@arcor.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605121109.55327.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Subject: Re: 6.1-STABLE : make installworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:10:13 -0000 On Friday 12 May 2006 06:59, Axel Burwitz wrote: > Hi, > > well, need some help... > > > I have just upgraded my system from 6.1-PRERELEASE to 6.1-STABLE, > with cvsup, make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel. > > The upgrade for the basic system went through, it shows 6.1-STABLE > version, and the fresh kernel version works, but: > > when I (in single-user mode) want to start "make installworld" > (while being in /usr/src) to upgrade the userland, it only gives > > " > ---- > > >>> Installing everything > > ---- > > cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install > > ===> share info (install) > ===> include (install) > > Creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh > touch not found > > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/src/include. > > *** Error code 1" > > > > No idea what to do now. > Check your system date. Almost everytime that make thinks it needs to use touch is due to the date on the computer being off. I run local time and have to use adjkerntz -i to set the local time zone. If your date is way off like it looks, you have to update it and then rebuild so that everything is current. You don't have any idea what wasn't built because it was thought to be current. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://www.soyandina.com/ "I am Andean project". http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 18:15:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F8816B2FF for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84AE43D60 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:15:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from localhost (monrovll-cuda1-24-53-251-44.pittpa.adelphia.net [24.53.251.44]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:15:12 -0400 id 00056405.4464D0B0.000003EB Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:15:11 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060512141511.66b2dbba.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20060512175626.GD34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <4463C5E4.50109@daleco.biz> <4463D2EC.1020100@waywood.co.uk> <20060512125648.GG5531@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464A7E5.7060000@waywood.co.uk> <20060512175626.GD34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:15:22 -0000 Daniel Bye wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote: > > >The fact that the operating system knows what the machine is called, > > >does not necessarily mean that the name is in the DNS. You can put an > > >entry in your /etc/hosts file (take a look at the file for the format), > > >which will allow sendmail and other daemons to start. > > > > OK, I looked in /etc/hosts and only 127.0.0.1 localhost appears there. > > How do I put another entry in here though, when I don't know in advance > > the IP address that will be allocated to this machine by the DHCP server > > (provided by my router)? The odd thing is that the system knows exactly > > what IP address has been assigned, because I can see that transaction > > taking place during the boot sequence long before the point where it > > stalls. Make an entry in /etc/hosts similar to: 127.0.0.1 hostname hostname.domain.com (Only substitute your actual host and domain names) Unless you reconfigure something, the resolver always checks /etc/hosts first. Thus the DNS timeouts will never occur as the system will find its hostname. Not that, in my experience, it's important to put _both_ the short name and the FQDN in. -- Bill Moran That's why I never kiss 'em on the mouth. Jayne Cobb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 18:15:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA5516A5F6 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomstroubleshooting.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972D543D5A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:15:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@tomstroubleshooting.com) Received: from zeus ([68.235.136.100]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060512181521.WZID9479.mta13.adelphia.net@zeus> for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:15:21 -0400 From: "Tom Moore" To: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:15:20 -0400 Message-ID: <008101c675f0$0a881890$6603a8c0@zeus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-index: AcZ17/m9hka2npIgTBCAFQrtOIvoaw== X-Relayed-By: GPGrelay Version 0.959 (Win32) Subject: Serial based install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:15:24 -0000 Hi guys. How do I force the FreeBSD to do a serial port based install? I'm installing on to a laptop, but want to control the install from a serial port on another machine because I can not see the screen on the laptop. I tried modifying the boot.flp image and putting a file called boot.conf with the following line in it: /boot/loader -h This didn't seem to work? Am I modifying the wrong image for this or should I modify one of the kernel images? Please advise what I should do next. Thanks, Tom -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/335 - Release Date: 5/9/2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 18:17:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43A716B2AB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA1E43D73 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:17:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.rollin@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i7so641292wra for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:17:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=poMo2L/zyfHIal5Zl+7j3jBVEMOApSBBHWWOCIcZ/I3ZYHG/eoqbMt23RPT12O7PhSX2lpdmzCFNhOpFCuv1sByhkK02L0gUPFkabgNucxHGi9b53sV8ZpV9DXqJCt3AYcchlfh9Gq+cKAkEgYwJpcyIWAYf4YdE7Yz1EXy9lzg= Received: by 10.65.216.16 with SMTP id t16mr1895269qbq; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.107.14 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0028260605121117g46e9c53ct24fffe57441dde8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:17:47 +0100 From: "Jeff Rollin" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <8a0028260605121043i106dcc7ct23faf02595965e6f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060512185626.D57174@justnosweat.net> <8a0028260605121043i106dcc7ct23faf02595965e6f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fwd: hello X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:17:55 -0000 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jeff Rollin Date: 12-May-2006 18:43 Subject: Re: hello To: justin Hi Justin > Everything runs ok and it seems like the module is installed. > There is only one problem, in the httpd.conf there is a LoadModule > php5_module refering to libexec/apache/libphp5.so. > > The library libphp5.so is not made by the install and so my appache will > not start with the php5 enabled. Is there any "libphp" file in libexec/apache? If so, have you tried making = a link to it? [code] ln -s libexec/apache/yourlibphpfile libexec/apache/libphp5.so [/code] HTH Jeff P.S. In future, you can help everyone concerned by putting a "real" subject in the subject line (something related to your problem, e.g. "installing libphp" would do in this instance). Ta. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------ Argument against Linux number 6,033: "...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 18:34:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488E416B3C7 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:34:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA2643D6E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:34:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from mail.dfwlp.com (localhost.int.dfwlp.com [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CIYntV060893; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:34:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from 167.246.36.14 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by mail.dfwlp.com with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:34:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <52234.167.246.36.14.1147458889.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <20060512185626.D57174@justnosweat.net> References: <20060512185626.D57174@justnosweat.net> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:34:49 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: "justin" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libphp5.so not compiling for apache (was hello) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:34:56 -0000 > > I `ve got a question about installing the php5 module. > I`m installing it from the /usr/ports/www/php5-session port. > > Everything runs ok and it seems like the module is installed. > There is only one problem, in the httpd.conf there is a LoadModule > php5_module refering to libexec/apache/libphp5.so. > > The library libphp5.so is not made by the install and so my appache will > not start with the php5 enabled. > > What is wrong and what can i do to let the install make the libphp5.so. > > Ok thanks in advance, > Justin. > > > i was having the same issue yesterday. take a look at the /usr/ports/lang/php5/Makefile. this was where my problem was, and tho i didnt use the www/php5-session, i would make a bet that if you begin from there with no php5 installed at all, then it backs up and begins from lang/php5, and then moves on from there. the problem with my lang/php5/Makefile was, that this line was not included (totally not there... not even there and commented out): WITH_APACHE= yes once i added it, did a pkg_delete -r php5-5.1.4 (-r = recurse all dependencies against this package), and started over, the lib file compiled on the next attempt. the port for php5-5.1.2 included that line, and therefor the lib file compiled by default previously. im not sure if the omission of "WITH_APACHE= yes" was by intention or not, but ill have to be sure to check it for near future installs. tht, jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 18:38:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8BA16B57E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:38:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF4343D62 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:38:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CIcgIg016395; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:38:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id k4CIcgJf016392; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:38:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:38:42 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20060512170406.GE26040@gothmog.pc> Message-ID: <20060512122847.F16342@wonkity.com> References: <200605121450.k4CEokhn022089@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20060512150608.GB25497@gothmog.pc> <20060512102134.J14220@wonkity.com> <20060512170406.GE26040@gothmog.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 12 May 2006 12:38:42 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trimming Whitespace From Beginning and end of Text Lines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:38:58 -0000 On Fri, 12 May 2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> The first sed expression is missing "//". Correcting that: >> sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*//' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' test.txt >> sed: lstat: No such file or directory > > Yeah, I noticed the missing // in the first regexp, but only > after I had posted the message. You're right, of course :) > > It seems odd that the fixed expression doesn't work though. > Which version of FreeBSD is this and what sed are you running? > > $ uname -v FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 22 19:18:33 MST 2006 > $ type sed That's a sh-ism (normally I use csh): sed is /usr/bin/sed Interestingly, the problem is different on 6.1 (csh or sh): sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*//' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' test.txt sed: -e: No such file or directory ...which is solved by giving a blank argument for -i: sed -i'' -e 's/^[[:space:]]*//' -e 's/[[:space:]]*$//' test.txt Gah. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 18:50:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7144616B680 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DBA43D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:50:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.66.115]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060512185041.TOOS14145.mta10.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:50:41 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE214B64E; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:51:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:51:07 -0400 From: Parv To: Barnaby Scott Message-ID: <20060512185107.GA4019@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Barnaby Scott , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44639855.90102@waywood.co.uk> <20060512022532.GA4383@holestein.holy.cow> <4463F9F7.8070009@waywood.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4463F9F7.8070009@waywood.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: very slow boot (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:50:50 -0000 in message <4463F9F7.8070009@waywood.co.uk>, wrote Barnaby Scott thusly... > > Parv wrote: > ... > >>and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5 > >>minutes every time. > > > >Does your screen goes blank just after the above message? If so, > >press [Enter] key, you should see the boot being continued, and > >"login:" waiting for input at the end. > > No the screen still has all the previous clutter on it, and > pressing [Enter] just makes a new line Ok then; sorry to waste your time. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 18:53:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E0A16AD14 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FE943D73 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:53:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so377770wxc for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:53:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KOXRhdcUqlCxvn2iipFavs4oNEyiOeHhe5DjvLiLmHULh9FrjVVNRBJqCdeaI+amreNg7yUYiubPYNGcbxCZroljQ2uyhuPI+fU3NDBFFzD6hre6FNeN74QQXVTgbBGuyl7XJ2wI8icZ4pFMVJdv1qxOFhTSuVFgs97f0L/EJwU= Received: by 10.70.21.5 with SMTP id 5mr18442wxu; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.42.4 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:53:31 -0700 From: "Derrick Ryalls" To: "FreeBSD Questions" , "Lowell Gilbert" In-Reply-To: <44hd3vl4x1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44hd3vl4x1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: Subject: Re: New folder permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:53:45 -0000 On 5/12/06, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Derrick Ryalls" writes: > > > I am having issues getting correct permissions set for files in a > > common area on a web/file server. I have webroot shared out via samba > > and under there I have an auto-thumbnail generation script that > > creates thumbnails in somefolder/.cache where somefolder is a newly > > created folder. Example: > > > > autothumbs\ > > mypics1\ > > image.jpg > > .cache > > image_thumb.jpg > > mypics2\ > > .cache > > ... > > > > What needs to happen is when a new folder is created under this > > autothumb tree, the permissions need to be set correctly so that the > > .cache folder can be automatically generated by the thumbnail process. > > I have the main folder listed as root:wheel 777 but when new folders > > are created they have user:wheel 755 permissions and the thumbnail > > script fails as it cannot write to the location. > > > > Is there something I am missing to get this setup properly? I know a > > workaround is the manually change the permissions of the folder when > > it is created, but since my wife will be wanting to add pictures, that > > isn't an option for her (very non-techy). The machine in question a > > 5.4-Stable box. > > > > Any suggestions on what I need to do? > > There are a lot of ways to do this, but the one I would recommend is > to change the main folder to be owned by a group that you, your wife, > and the uid running the thumbnail script all are members of -- > probably by creating a new group for the purpose. Then if you set > your wife's umask to 002, directories she creates will be available to > you and any other members of the group. > Would I change the umask on the webserver or on her desktop? If on the desktop, then how does this work when she is booted into Windows? I do like the idea of this solution, but she doesn't even like shell access so .bashrc wouldn't be executed. Is there a way to set umask functionality somewhere else? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:03:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BFB16B6AB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811B943D64 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 22400 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 19:03:21 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 May 2006 19:03:21 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 059D728426; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:03:21 -0400 (EDT) To: "Derrick Ryalls" References: <44hd3vl4x1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:03:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Ryalls's message of "Fri, 12 May 2006 11:53:31 -0700") Message-ID: <44irobkqvb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: New folder permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:03:36 -0000 "Derrick Ryalls" writes: > On 5/12/06, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> There are a lot of ways to do this, but the one I would recommend is >> to change the main folder to be owned by a group that you, your wife, >> and the uid running the thumbnail script all are members of -- >> probably by creating a new group for the purpose. Then if you set >> your wife's umask to 002, directories she creates will be available to >> you and any other members of the group. >> > > Would I change the umask on the webserver or on her desktop? If on > the desktop, then how does this work when she is booted into Windows? > I do like the idea of this solution, but she doesn't even like shell > access so .bashrc wouldn't be executed. Is there a way to set umask > functionality somewhere else? > I think you need to configure Samba directly for this. I suspect "create mask = 0775" would do it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:15:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DDC16B819 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB7D43D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:15:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CJFaXq064308; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:15:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4464DED3.7040606@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:15:31 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeff.cross@averageadmins.com References: <20060512101510.z2k66mhqz1d1c4cw@www.averageadmins.com> In-Reply-To: <20060512101510.z2k66mhqz1d1c4cw@www.averageadmins.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:15:48 -0000 jeff.cross@averageadmins.com wrote: > This has possibly been discussed a number of times, and if it has, I > apologize. Here is my situation: > Apology accepted ;-) :-D > I would like to upgrade my existing 6.0-SECURITY system to 6.1-RELEASE > and continue using freebsd-update to keep my system on the up and up. I > read through the upgrade instructions on disk #1 of the 6.1 release CD > and wondered if that would be the easiest way to upgrade? > The canonical way is via a cvsup/buildworld procedure as outlined in the FreeBSD Handbook. There is also a "binary upgrade" option in sysinstall(8); I've never used it, never seen it discussed, and don't know how well it works. I have to assume it does until proven otherwise, though. > From what I read, all of the configuration files for 6.1 would be in > the /etc/upgrade folder. Would they have to stay there? Would 6.1, > from this point forward, always have the /etc folder in /etc/upgrade? > Do I copy new pieces back to /etc for the production system? I read > about merging but does it merge from /etc to /etc/upgrade? > mergemaster is the standard for upgrading /etc, though some other options exist. mergemaster, in general, takes the new source files from /usr/src/etc, sets up a temporary /etc/ tree under /var/temproot, and uses diff(1) to find/display differences between the two files. Generally, you want to accept new files if you've never changed the configuration file in question, and merge the old and new files for those you have modified. In some cases, the changes to the new files are trivial, in which case you ignore the new file or make the trivial changes manually later, if you're a perfectionist. IIRC, other tools exist to accomplish this, also. You might search the ports tree for "etcmerge", IIRC. As for /etc/upgrade, it doesn't exist on my system. Where did you read about it? Perhaps it's part of the sysinstall(8) "binary upgrade" procedure? > Is another scenario to do the cvsup method and go that route? If I did, > would I be able to use freebsd-update from that point forward or would I > be limited to only using the cvsup method? > I'm not yet familiar with Colin's fine update tool, but I don't think that they would in any way conflict (unless you attempted to use them simultaneously). Please refer to freebsd-update documentation for authoritative answers in this regard. The difference is that freebsd-update is an attempt to replace system binaries with a standard, secure set of newly-compiled binaries. cvsup/buildworld et al is an automated (well, semi-automated) procedure for rebuilding the system from its source code. > I know both require merging config files and what not, which makes me a > little nervous, but I would like the easiest method available. I love > using FreeBSD and use it primarily on my laptop so compiling the entire > OS on there may take a while so obviously the binary upgrade looks > good. I am just unsure about the /etc/upgrade folder and how I get all > of that back to /etc. Make a backup and go for it! Kevin Kinsey -- We should have a Vollyballocracy. We elect a six-pack of presidents. Each one serves until they screw up, at which point they rotate. -- Dennis Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:17:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC29C16ACD4 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:17:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1086443D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:17:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (snipe.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by grog.secure-computing.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CJM28w005527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 May 2006 14:22:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=grog; d=secure-computing.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=kTH5mUGI9dSS+Sdyk+aom2NVgh9jBrkmR7iAPG42vm+vu4bEqkkCzeY6kFFlgdUkA ALtM5UF2ZEhCw6IsKFQ7w== In-Reply-To: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> References: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:17:35 -0500 To: bsd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on grog.secure-computing.net Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:18:01 -0000 On May 12, 2006, at 11:11 AM, bsd wrote: > Hello, > > I have three partitions on my server and would like to reduce the > size of / because I am getting quite full ! > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ar0s1a 3.8G 2.8G 668M 81% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/ar0s1d 60G 1.9G 53G 3% /home > > > What are the places I could start looking in to delete not so > usefull files, knowing that I am syncing using portsnat (and > previously cvsup). A good command I use when things start getting full is: #du -hd 1 [filesystem] Where [filesystem] is the partition path you want stats on. My output looks like this: # du -hd 1 / 2.0K /.snap 1.5K /dev 49G /usr 841M /var 3.1G /www 2.3M /stand 3.1M /etc 2.0K /cdrom 924K /bin 39M /boot 3.2M /lib 282K /libexec 2.0K /mnt 2.0K /proc 3.5M /rescue 15M /root 4.0M /sbin 8.3M /tmp 2.0K /floppy 2.2M /jail 53G / It can tell you where your using the most space. I'm guessing your / usr directory is the culprit. Try going to /usr/ports and typing make distclean. ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:21:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18C316A90E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0732A43D58 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:21:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s19so376545wxc for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:21:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tlUKwA5wktBoSBeD9rh2B3mgDml+/RzzTE7fsg6+ajYthx6YjxHFJ8IreeFJMPWZre2OdLsayw93kiSUIhjRGcTOMI233EQAyrQ1NY5XN+k51iQ0xCKfm71DRtzvhlV5tKNDTys7QBU8fo3fTvX5Lro6NK/W6yQZwZsKWGHnikw= Received: by 10.70.99.5 with SMTP id w5mr3337504wxb; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.42.4 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:21:30 -0700 From: "Derrick Ryalls" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Lowell Gilbert" In-Reply-To: <44irobkqvb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44hd3vl4x1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <44irobkqvb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: Subject: Re: New folder permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:21:46 -0000 On 5/12/06, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Derrick Ryalls" writes: > > > On 5/12/06, Lowell Gilbert wr= ote: > > >> There are a lot of ways to do this, but the one I would recommend is > >> to change the main folder to be owned by a group that you, your wife, > >> and the uid running the thumbnail script all are members of -- > >> probably by creating a new group for the purpose. Then if you set > >> your wife's umask to 002, directories she creates will be available to > >> you and any other members of the group. > >> > > > > Would I change the umask on the webserver or on her desktop? If on > > the desktop, then how does this work when she is booted into Windows? > > I do like the idea of this solution, but she doesn't even like shell > > access so .bashrc wouldn't be executed. Is there a way to set umask > > functionality somewhere else? > > > > I think you need to configure Samba directly for this. > I suspect "create mask =3D 0775" would do it. > > Thanks, I didn't even know about that option. I will try that out when I get home. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:24:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C928A16ADEE for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F10943D6D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:24:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CJOawA064376; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:24:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4464E0EF.9020106@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:24:31 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: justin References: <20060512185626.D57174@justnosweat.net> In-Reply-To: <20060512185626.D57174@justnosweat.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hello (DSL -- should be: installing PHP5) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:24:46 -0000 justin wrote: > > I `ve got a question about installing the php5 module. > I`m installing it from the /usr/ports/www/php5-session port. > Interesting; that's not the usual place. > Everything runs ok and it seems like the module is installed. > There is only one problem, in the httpd.conf there is a LoadModule > php5_module refering to libexec/apache/libphp5.so. > > The library libphp5.so is not made by the install and so my appache will > not start with the php5 enabled. > > What is wrong and what can i do to let the install make the libphp5.so. php5-session is a "sub-port" if you will; it's supposed to be an extension to /usr/ports/lang/php5. IIRC, this was "split out" from PHP5 quite some time ago. So, you should *probably* install /usr/ports/lang/php5 first, and then install the php5-session port; or, even better, install lang/php5 and then lang/php5-extensions, and you can get sessions and all other kinds of 'neat stuff', too. HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- All other things being equal, a bald man cannot be elected President of the United States. -- Vic Gold From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:25:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C6E16B852 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766EA43D5D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:24:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CJOaQ8021004; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:24:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4464E0EF.8010201@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:24:31 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: <20060512185626.D57174@justnosweat.net> <52234.167.246.36.14.1147458889.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <52234.167.246.36.14.1147458889.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE5BA6BC8618647749D12E3E0" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 12 May 2006 20:24:36 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.2/1460/Fri May 12 14:09:22 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, justin Subject: Re: libphp5.so not compiling for apache (was hello) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:25:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE5BA6BC8618647749D12E3E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jonathan Horne wrote: >> I `ve got a question about installing the php5 module. >> I`m installing it from the /usr/ports/www/php5-session port. >> >> Everything runs ok and it seems like the module is installed. >> There is only one problem, in the httpd.conf there is a LoadModule >> php5_module refering to libexec/apache/libphp5.so. >> >> The library libphp5.so is not made by the install and so my appache wi= ll >> not start with the php5 enabled. >> >> What is wrong and what can i do to let the install make the libphp5.so= =2E >> >> Ok thanks in advance, >> Justin. >> >> >> >=20 > i was having the same issue yesterday. take a look at the > /usr/ports/lang/php5/Makefile. this was where my problem was, and tho = i > didnt use the www/php5-session, i would make a bet that if you begin fr= om > there with no php5 installed at all, then it backs up and begins from > lang/php5, and then moves on from there. >=20 > the problem with my lang/php5/Makefile was, that this line was not > included (totally not there... not even there and commented out): >=20 > WITH_APACHE=3D yes >=20 > once i added it, did a pkg_delete -r php5-5.1.4 (-r =3D recurse all > dependencies against this package), and started over, the lib file > compiled on the next attempt. >=20 > the port for php5-5.1.2 included that line, and therefor the lib file > compiled by default previously. im not sure if the omission of > "WITH_APACHE=3D yes" was by intention or not, but ill have to be sur= e to > check it for near future installs. The canonical way to do this is by typing 'make config' in the lang/php5 port, and making sure the 'Apache' checkbox is checked. Then reinstall php5. This will create a supplementary makefile under /var/db/ports/ whic= h will set various options according to your desires, and which will persis= t across ports updates and so forth. It is, however, a bit of a bug in the= whole options processing thing that if the list of available options chan= ges, you aren't prompted to redo the configuration step when you go to update the port. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE5BA6BC8618647749D12E3E0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEZOD08Mjk52CukIwRA3XRAJ96R/OzalARd5lhc9JE0GyA4oed2QCePr2C AIQu92bnWLX/IgZif4ZqQLU= =5gY7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE5BA6BC8618647749D12E3E0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:43:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2651716A7BB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aren.tyr@gawab.com) Received: from info9.gawab.com (info9.gawab.com [204.97.230.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CBE543D5C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:43:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aren.tyr@gawab.com) Received: (qmail 15068 invoked by uid 1004); 12 May 2006 19:45:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yggdrasil) (aren.tyr@gawab.com@62.56.59.47) by gawab.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 19:45:55 -0000 X-Trusted: Whitelisted From: Aren Olvalde Tyr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:43:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1315269.SViRXaebyP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605122043.29960.aren.tyr@gawab.com> Subject: Re: 1 cpu + 2 monitors + 2 keybord/mouse is it possible X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:43:37 -0000 --nextPart1315269.SViRXaebyP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > Reading the man page for kbdmux it isn't clear to me if the keyboards will > work independently in X but it might be worth a try. Theoretically it shouldn't be a problem using separate keyboards/mice under= =20 [separate] X [sessions]; simply use a separate xorg.conf configuration file= s=20 per display, each one set to use the appropriate keyboard/mouse. So as long as kbdmux is happy, I don't see a problem. I suspect it might be easiest to have one PS/2 mouse & keyboard, and one US= B=20 mouse & keyboard. Aren. --nextPart1315269.SViRXaebyP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEZOVhoWGxb6IQ4B4RAiDHAKCAteCWylYQisYN4PwizvGc69skgACgrLBE En4nlk86zm5svbrGQPpCXAc= =5wax -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1315269.SViRXaebyP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:49:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5806F16A899 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stonerte@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6F643D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:49:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stonerte@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so353996nfe for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:49:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=r2FpRWr++wTcQ0MDMVTSyvC0elwSweWZxOT1Ga7kdJJyr6p6ldp6i+VntobaKdLH1DHnIb7VrbxIUrdO04xPtvf03YPorLeQRPQqBCmOXO5zy/CmUYI/lKqOzLtga/WtdpphprCHKTzUU7vQh4o0GfMzj30HnTNP3e1VpBW1C20= Received: by 10.48.221.20 with SMTP id t20mr58838nfg; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.69.1 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8bd19c4f0605121249u1d3a0d56td9afb0fd3512955a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:49:22 -0700 From: "Terry Stoner" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Access from the internet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:49:25 -0000 Hi my name is Terry Stoner. I just set up a new Firewall, FreeBSD 6.0, and am having trouble connecting from the internet. Basically I want to ssh from work. I set sshd_config to listen on all interfaces and on port 21, this port is not blocked outbound from work. I have ipfilter rules allowin= g inbound on this port and interface. I setup port forwarding on my netgear router. When I do a tcpdump I see myself hitting the interface of my firewall, but sshd is not responding. I get to my box, but no dice. Do yo= u have any suggestions? I would appreciate it. Thank you, Terry Stoner From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:51:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1A016A524 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE4043D68 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:51:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so386105wxc for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:51:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ON5yZasa5t2tEZnkSkkNKRO93l78v9kFG680qUKDZhMsyt18TQcX3iwz5DPDa7OX9mRGxF0J4LDrTfkrwNkJyTrDUysP6jHh3wVlTccW1XVC1sm0B+vxBy3zs6Y4psNbqo393tfCTnWzwIet0EKTArhq3H6NveCjwuew+qUUic8= Received: by 10.70.71.9 with SMTP id t9mr94177wxa; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.57.8 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:51:11 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Andrea Venturoli" In-Reply-To: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44649FA9.6080700@netfence.it> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck way too slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:51:16 -0000 On 5/12/06, Andrea Venturoli cwaeth: "one big root partition." Don't do this. --=20 -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:58:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381F816AD89 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:58:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from svr85.edns1.com (svr85.edns1.com [67.15.56.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BCA43D69 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:57:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from cpanel by svr85.edns1.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Fedlm-0006Zk-Gf; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:57:50 -0700 Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1]) by www.averageadmins.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:57:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20060512125750.lpwmaf1m75hwscwk@www.averageadmins.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:57:50 -0700 From: jeff.cross@averageadmins.com To: "Zimmerman, Eric" References: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04464C21@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> In-Reply-To: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04464C21@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.1) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr85.edns1.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32001 503] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - averageadmins.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:58:01 -0000 Quoting "Zimmerman, Eric" : > Freebsd-update works on my box (but theres been no updates as of yet). > > As long as you track RELEASE it should work fine > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: jeff.cross@averageadmins.com > [mailto:jeff.cross@averageadmins.com] >> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 2:10 PM >> To: Zimmerman, Eric >> Subject: RE: Upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1 >> >> Quoting "Zimmerman, Eric" : >> >> > Try this >> > >> > https://mikestammer.com/doku.php?id=3Dupdateos >> > >> > its what I wrote up for myself when I update >> > >> > worked for me from 6 to 6.1 and should meet your needs just fine >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- >> >> questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of jeff.cross@averageadmins.com >> >> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 12:15 PM >> >> To: questions@freebsd.org >> >> Cc: jeff.cross@averageadmins.com >> >> Subject: Upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1 >> >> >> >> This has possibly been discussed a number of times, and if it has, > I >> >> apologize. Here is my situation: >> >> >> >> I would like to upgrade my existing 6.0-SECURITY system to > 6.1-RELEASE >> >> and continue using freebsd-update to keep my system on the up and > up. >> >> I read through the upgrade instructions on disk #1 of the 6.1 > release >> >> CD and wondered if that would be the easiest way to upgrade? >> >> >> >> From what I read, all of the configuration files for 6.1 would be > in >> >> the /etc/upgrade folder. Would they have to stay there? Would > 6.1, >> >> from this point forward, always have the /etc folder in > /etc/upgrade? >> >> Do I copy new pieces back to /etc for the production system? I > read >> >> about merging but does it merge from /etc to /etc/upgrade? >> >> >> >> Is another scenario to do the cvsup method and go that route? If I >> >> did, would I be able to use freebsd-update from that point forward > or >> >> would I be limited to only using the cvsup method? >> >> >> >> I know both require merging config files and what not, which makes > me >> >> a little nervous, but I would like the easiest method available. I >> >> love using FreeBSD and use it primarily on my laptop so compiling > the >> >> entire OS on there may take a while so obviously the binary upgrade >> >> looks good. I am just unsure about the /etc/upgrade folder and how > I >> >> get all of that back to /etc. >> >> >> >> I am somewhat a "noobert" in FreeBSD... I have been using it for > less >> >> than a year and really enjoy it over my past Linux experiences. >> >> However, things like this make me nervous. This is my first > upgrade >> >> of a machine I use *all* the time. >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> >> >> Jeff Cross >> >> http://www.averageadmins.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> >> Thanks! I will give this a try. But, before I do, can I still use >> freebsd-update to maintain my system from that point forward or will I >> have to use the cvsup method of updating? >> >> Jeff Cross >> http://www.averageadmins.com/ > Thanks for the input, Eric and Kevin! I guess I'll start the process =20 this evening and maybe everything will be through compiling by Monday in time for work! :) Thanks again! Jeff Cross http://www.averageadmins.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:26:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B379D16A488 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEBE43D53 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:26:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4CKPqB0070887; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:25:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060512152402.026a60c8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:25:44 -0500 To: Eric Schuele , FreeBSD Questions From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <4464CEDA.80906@computer.org> References: <4464B95D.1040702@computer.org> <20060512171515.GC34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464CEDA.80906@computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of running under inetd.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:26:54 -0000 inetd running is discouraged. Instead run the daemons on boot using rc scripts. If you look back in the history, inetd running is a security risk, and was discouraged in the 5.X releases. -Derek At 01:07 PM 5/12/2006, Eric Schuele wrote: >Daniel Bye wrote: >>On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote: >>>Hello, >>> >>>I run sshd and ftpd on my laptop. I generally start them via: >>> sshd_enable="YES" >>> ftpd_enable="YES" >>>in my rc.conf. >>> >>>What are the pros/cons of running them via inetd? >>> >>>This is in no way a high load or production machine. Just my laptop >>>that I need access to from time to time. >>> >>>The one pro I have noticed (which is rather important to me) is that >>>ftpd does not heed hosts.allow directives when NOT run via inetd. Am I >>>correct in this? I prefer to use tcpwrappers to further protect my sshd >>>and ftpd. I generally keep ftpd firewalled off from the world and when >>>someone needs to (anonymous) ftp something to me I open the firewall. >>>But it would be nice to allow only their IP using hosts.allow (as I just >>>enable/disable a generic ruleset in ipfw). So should I forget to >>>disable the ruleset in ipfw then I am not open all day till I reboot. > >Thanks for the response. > >>When sshd starts, it needs to generate keys and set up its cryptographic >>environment, so you will notice a bit of lag before getting a login >>prompt. This may or may not mean anything to you, depending on how >>beefy your laptop is. >>Check man sshd for the -i option. >>sshd should, by default, be compiled with tcpwrappers support anyway. >>You can test whether this is the case by putting something like this at >>the top of your hosts.allow: >>sshd : 127.0.0.1 : deny >>and then try connecting on the loopback interface. If you see `refused >>connect from localhost' in your /var/log/auth.log, then your sshd uses >>hosts.allow and running it from inetd won't give you any benefit. > >Actually I have sshd under control. It works fine, and yes uses >tcpwrappers by default. > >>I don't know about ftpd, as I don't use it. > >ftpd however does not seem to use them. > >>Dan > >Although I am curious about ftpd and tcpwrappers.... I am also interested >in whether or not running these daemons under inetd is preferred or >not. If so why? If not, why? > >-- >Regards, >Eric >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:29:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672B316A474 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B605A43D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:29:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.62 #0) id 1FeeGV-000GVj-11 by authid for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:29:35 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:29:34 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20060512202934.GE34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <4464B95D.1040702@computer.org> <20060512171515.GC34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464CEDA.80906@computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464CEDA.80906@computer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of running under inetd.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:29:38 -0000 --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:07:22PM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote: >=20 > Although I am curious about ftpd and tcpwrappers.... I am also=20 > interested in whether or not running these daemons under inetd is=20 > preferred or not. If so why? If not, why? Certainly for anything that has a reasonably expensive start up, such as sshd, you will probably want to run it as a standalone daemon, because it's easier on the system to start it up only once and then fork a new child for each client connection. On the other hand, using inetd will allow you to have only one 'superserver' running, which can spawn the appropriate daemon as required. This means that you won't have idle daemons lying around, as they are cleaned up once the session ends. One obvious shortcoming, as you point out, is that the stock ftpd doesn't seem to understand how to consult /etc/hosts.allow, so if you have one configured already, then you might want to use inetd to control ftpd. There may be alternative ftpd servers in the ports that do know how to use tcpwrappers, but I've never used any others so don't know. So, I suppose the real answer to your question is that you should use inetd if you need to use one of the features that it provides, such as tcpwrappers. I can't think of any reason to not use inetd, and I haven't heard any reasonable arguments suggesting it's particularly bad for your health. YMMV, etc. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZPAuixf5fBYiFmoRAik7AKCbUcIWLzHq951uzbt1eZfN7YcPJQCfajJT tjYDw9oGBhmWB1Nfx7XMIO8= =txZ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:30:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374F116A515 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0848A43D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:30:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4CKUKPq070954; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:30:20 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060512152730.026778c8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:30:14 -0500 To: "Terry Stoner" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <8bd19c4f0605121249u1d3a0d56td9afb0fd3512955a@mail.gmail.co m> References: <8bd19c4f0605121249u1d3a0d56td9afb0fd3512955a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Access from the internet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:30:49 -0000 Can you ssh to your system from another unit in your home LAN? Check that you don't have restrictions set in /etc/hosts.allow One other thing, ssh uses port 22, NOT port 21. -Derek At 02:49 PM 5/12/2006, Terry Stoner wrote: >Hi my name is Terry Stoner. I just set up a new Firewall, FreeBSD 6.0, and >am having trouble connecting from the internet. Basically I want to ssh >from work. I set sshd_config to listen on all interfaces and on port 21, >this port is not blocked outbound from work. I have ipfilter rules allowing >inbound on this port and interface. I setup port forwarding on my netgear >router. When I do a tcpdump I see myself hitting the interface of my >firewall, but sshd is not responding. I get to my box, but no dice. Do you >have any suggestions? I would appreciate it. > >Thank you, > >Terry Stoner >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:34:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7763416A794 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C869143D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:34:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4CKY97H071024; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:34:09 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060512153032.026c5bc0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:34:03 -0500 To: Ashley Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <200605121737.33180.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> References: <200605121737.33180.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading 6.0 to 6.1 with etcmerge X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:34:34 -0000 Add the audit group to /etc/group if you have not. you would add: audit:*:77: As for /etc/master.passwd, you can usually ignore this. The mergemaster shows the differences which will be the CVS id in the first line, and any differences from adding or removing users. -Derek At 11:37 AM 5/12/2006, Ashley Moran wrote: >I've got a few 6.0-RELEASE machines I want to bring up to date. I want to >use >etcmerge because mergemaster scares the bejesus out of me. > >I can create a copy of the standard 6.0-REL /etc using mergemaster, and >copying /var/tmp/temproot/src to /var/db/src, that's no problem > >But I notice /usr/src/UPDATING contains the following: > > 20060204: > The 'audit' group was added to support the new auditing functionality > in the base system. Be sure to follow the directions for updating, > including the requirement to run mergemaster -p. > >So I figure after rebooting into single user mode and installing the new >world, I have to take an extra step? I never figured out how to deal with >the binary password db with etc merge, and I can't see anything in the man >page. > >I hope someone can clear it up. I assume etcmerge is widely used, but it's >not been updated (significantly) for so long I'm not sure. (Personally I >think it should be in the base system!) > >Thanks >Ashley > >-- >"If you do it the stupid way, you will have to do it again" > - Gregory Chudnovsky >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:38:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091F116A931 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5688543D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:38:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4CKbu8q071094; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:37:57 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060512153425.026bb8b0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:37:50 -0500 To: jeff.cross@averageadmins.com, questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <20060512101510.z2k66mhqz1d1c4cw@www.averageadmins.com> References: <20060512101510.z2k66mhqz1d1c4cw@www.averageadmins.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jeff.cross@averageadmins.com Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:38:25 -0000 I have done both the binary upgrade and cvsup'd many times. Which is better depends on your time and what version you are moving from and to. If you do a binary upgrade, you will only be at the release of the version, say 6.1, but with any current security releases. I typically upgrade a system to the base release using a binary upgrade, then will cvsup then build world, etc. to have it be current. -Derek At 12:15 PM 5/12/2006, jeff.cross@averageadmins.com wrote: >This has possibly been discussed a number of times, and if it has, I >apologize. Here is my situation: > >I would like to upgrade my existing 6.0-SECURITY system to 6.1-RELEASE >and continue using freebsd-update to keep my system on the up and up. >I read through the upgrade instructions on disk #1 of the 6.1 release >CD and wondered if that would be the easiest way to upgrade? > > From what I read, all of the configuration files for 6.1 would be in >the /etc/upgrade folder. Would they have to stay there? Would 6.1, >from this point forward, always have the /etc folder in /etc/upgrade? >Do I copy new pieces back to /etc for the production system? I read >about merging but does it merge from /etc to /etc/upgrade? > >Is another scenario to do the cvsup method and go that route? If I >did, would I be able to use freebsd-update from that point forward or >would I be limited to only using the cvsup method? > >I know both require merging config files and what not, which makes me >a little nervous, but I would like the easiest method available. I >love using FreeBSD and use it primarily on my laptop so compiling the >entire OS on there may take a while so obviously the binary upgrade >looks good. I am just unsure about the /etc/upgrade folder and how I >get all of that back to /etc. > >I am somewhat a "noobert" in FreeBSD... I have been using it for less >than a year and really enjoy it over my past Linux experiences. >However, things like this make me nervous. This is my first upgrade >of a machine I use *all* the time. > >Thanks in advance! > >Jeff Cross >http://www.averageadmins.com/ >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:41:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6EE16AA30 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26D443D68 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:41:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060512204127.PXQB15723.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm69aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:41:27 -0400 Received: from wcox.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060512204127.KZFW21509.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net@wcox.bellsouth.net> for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:41:27 -0400 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20060512163433.02e85298@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:41:36 -0400 To: freeBSD Questions From: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20060512152402.026a60c8@mail.computinginnovatio ns.com> References: <4464B95D.1040702@computer.org> <20060512171515.GC34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464CEDA.80906@computer.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20060512152402.026a60c8@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of running under inetd.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:41:37 -0000 At 04:25 PM 5/12/2006, you wrote: >inetd running is discouraged. Instead run the daemons on boot using >rc scripts. If you look back in the history, inetd running is a >security risk, and was discouraged in the 5.X releases. Is that still really true? Waaayyy back when, inetd would have all kinds of dangerous services enabled by default (allowing DOS stuff like spewing "chargen" into "discard"). But that was a configuration issue, and issues with the services it launched; not with inetd itself. The authentication is still done within ftpd. You're just saving the tiny overhead of running it all the time for occasional use. And inetd does allow the tcpwrappers for anything it launches (obviously the wrappers are compiled into many other things now, ftpd included.) -Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:47:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C89C16AB05 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Solsyst@netscape.net) Received: from imo-d02.mx.aol.com (imo-d02.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAA643D5F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:47:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Solsyst@netscape.net) Received: from Solsyst@netscape.net by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id n.1b4.12510c34 (16240) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:47:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mblkn-m02 (mblkn-m02.mblk.aol.com [64.12.170.66]) by air-in03.mx.aol.com (v109.12) with ESMTP id MAILININ34-3f704464f4751a8; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:47:49 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:47:49 -0400 From: solsyst@netscape.net Message-Id: <8C8441C7729695A-D0-13591@mblkn-m02.sysops.aol.com> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User Received: from 64.58.11.45 by mblkn-m02.sysops.aol.com (64.12.170.66) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 12 May 2006 16:47:47 -0400 X-Mailer: Netscape WebMail 17673 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-AOL-IP: 64.12.170.66 X-Spam-Flag: NO Cc: Subject: StarOffice inmstallation in FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:47:58 -0000 Dear FreeBSD: Here is my problem description and my question. I have a bin file for Star office 5.2. (so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin).=20 Somehow, a few years ago, I successfully installed it on my Linux=20 system. I recently installed FreeBSD 6.0 and checked my Linux (base 8)=20 compatibility. Seems to be operating ok. So, first I did a "brandelf -t linux=20 /usr/TEMP/so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin so that FreeBSD sees the file as a=20 linux binary. Then I ran ./so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin /net under TRUSS=20 and observed the execution opening and closing several files. But when=20 it opened /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 it was not happy. It closed the=20 file and reported that "ELF file OS ABI invalid.". So I did a brandelf=20 on the file and sure enough was told "is of brand FreeBSD" So here is my question: The file /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 is used in=20 the X system. Will I screw up my X system if I do a "brandelf -t linux=20 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6" to this file so that=20 ,/so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin sees a Linux binary? I am assuming that a=20 "brandelf -t linux /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6" will fix the error "ELF=20 file OS ABI invalid."and the ./so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin execution=20 will continue to the next file problem, and so on till star office is=20 loaded and I can install and run under star office. Clearly I do not want to screw up my Xsystem and not be able to run=20 KDE. It is working very well including Koffice components. P.S. I did read the Handbook 10.8 Advanced Topics & some other docs. ___________________________________________________ Try the New Netscape Mail Today! Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List http://mail.netscape.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 21:05:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA4416B01A; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from thompson.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43BB43D68; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from thompson.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thompson.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4BNRJxk009182; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:27:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by thompson.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4BNRGtU009181; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:27:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) X-Authentication-Warning: thompson.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eric@anholt.net using -f From: Eric Anholt To: martinko In-Reply-To: <445E4FCC.10605@pobox.sk> References: <445E4FCC.10605@pobox.sk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ykNqQ8x82Z8GtGXs+2ka" Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:27:14 -0700 Message-Id: <1147390034.9156.5.camel@thompson> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: X11 6.9 issue -- options "AGPMode" and "AGPFastWrite" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:05:33 -0000 --=-ykNqQ8x82Z8GtGXs+2ka Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 21:51 +0200, martinko wrote:=20 > hello list! >=20 > i've just upgraded X11 from 6.8.2 to 6.9.0 and run into the following iss= ue: >=20 > after starting x11 for the first time the screen went black and console=20 > was inaccessible (i had to reboot). when i tried the generated xorg.conf=20 > (`Xorg -configure`) it worked. so i started comparing my old config file=20 > with the new one and found out that the following two options i had been=20 > using are the root of the problem: > Option "AGPMode" "4" # ++ 2005-02-11 mato > Option "AGPFastWrite" # ++ 2005-02-11 mato > they just cannot be set both at the same time now. > and i wonder why. > and also i wonder which one to comment out and which one to keep (if any=20 > at all). Comment them both out and live a happier life with a more stable computer. In my testing (and as far as I know, I'm the only one who has done performance comparisons with AGPMode), AGPMode 4 provided no meaningful performance improvement except under contrived circumstances. AGPFastWrite is the most unstable option ever, and I couldn't benchmark because it crashes. We've threatened to just disconnect these options upstream and not tell anyone, because they're that harmful but people seem to think they're secret performance sauce that the developers don't want to give them. --=20 Eric Anholt anholt@FreeBSD.org eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com --=-ykNqQ8x82Z8GtGXs+2ka Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQBEY8hSHUdvYGzw6vcRAo4lAJ4i3i+hTMYuccCoU+cPW0WUylchJgCY7aoN 7rkBflBAUMBG/LPPuybNAg== =cgaw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ykNqQ8x82Z8GtGXs+2ka-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 21:18:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A35D16AAFE for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B50A43D5E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:18:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from localhost (monrovll-cuda1-24-53-251-44.pittpa.adelphia.net [24.53.251.44]) (AUTH: LOGIN wmoran, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:18:19 -0400 id 00056403.4464FB9B.00000FB8 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:18:18 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: solsyst@netscape.net Message-Id: <20060512171818.78252405.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <8C8441C7729695A-D0-13591@mblkn-m02.sysops.aol.com> References: <8C8441C7729695A-D0-13591@mblkn-m02.sysops.aol.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: StarOffice inmstallation in FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:18:25 -0000 solsyst@netscape.net wrote: > Dear FreeBSD: > Here is my problem description and my question. > > I have a bin file for Star office 5.2. (so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin). > Somehow, a few years ago, I successfully installed it on my Linux > system. This is not a direct answer to your question, but is there any reason why you can't install OpenOffice.org? Especially considering the fact that SO 5.2 is _really_ old, and OpenOffice.org replaces it anyway? > I recently installed FreeBSD 6.0 and checked my Linux (base 8) > compatibility. Seems to be operating ok. > > So, first I did a "brandelf -t linux > /usr/TEMP/so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin so that FreeBSD sees the file as a > linux binary. Then I ran ./so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin /net under TRUSS > and observed the execution opening and closing several files. But when > it opened /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 it was not happy. It closed the > file and reported that "ELF file OS ABI invalid.". So I did a brandelf > on the file and sure enough was told "is of brand FreeBSD" > > So here is my question: The file /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 is used in > the X system. Will I screw up my X system if I do a "brandelf -t linux > /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6" to this file so that > ,/so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin sees a Linux binary? I am assuming that a > "brandelf -t linux /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6" will fix the error "ELF > file OS ABI invalid."and the ./so-5_2-ga-bin-linux-en.bin execution > will continue to the next file problem, and so on till star office is > loaded and I can install and run under star office. Good luck. I expect that trying to brandelf your way around this problem won't work, but you can try it. If is screws up X, just re-brand the binary back to FreeBSD. I expect, however, that branding it _will_ break X, and won't help with your installation anyway. -- Bill Moran ZOE: Preacher, don't the Bible have some pretty specific things to say about killing? BOOK: Quite specific. It is, however, somewhat fuzzier on the subject of kneecaps. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 21:29:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E311516B02B for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C40E43DAC for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from [198.182.157.171] (not-in-use.calarts.edu [198.182.157.171] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CLSFKT085111 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:28:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <4464FE0B.4050509@calarts.edu> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:28:43 -0700 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 Subject: How to require minium length passwords X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:29:22 -0000 I am trying to require users to put in 8 character passwords but as it stands it will take 1 just fine. I Tried messing with the login.conf file but it still looks like it accepts 1 character as an acceptable password. here is what i did. Also will this restrict other programs to the set minimum or can they just set the password to what there parameters dictate? such as usermin password change util. added this under default :minpasswordlen=8:\ ran the data base cap_mkdb /etc/login.conf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 21:31:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0085016A5CD for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6B443D55 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:31:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CLViNf065176; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:31:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4464FEBA.3010506@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:31:38 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeff.cross@averageadmins.com References: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E04464C21@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> <20060512125750.lpwmaf1m75hwscwk@www.averageadmins.com> In-Reply-To: <20060512125750.lpwmaf1m75hwscwk@www.averageadmins.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:31:53 -0000 jeff.cross@averageadmins.com wrote: > > Thanks for the input, Eric and Kevin! I guess I'll start the process > this evening and > maybe everything will be through compiling by Monday in time for work! :) > > Thanks again! > I've got the process in 2 scripts, and a brief evening is generally all that's required for the cvsup/buildworld and friends. Buildworld is two hours plus, IIRC, on my 1.7924 GHz desktop; buildkernel about 35 minutes on GENERIC, installkernel 1 minute. Since installworld is after the break/reboot, I don't know the exact time. It appears the last cycle was about 4 hours total, judging from the email timestamps, but that's with (probably), me working in X in the background, a pause between finishing kernel build and the reboot, etc. Now, "portupgrade -arR", OTOH, is a two-day+ to-do, at least if you only do it every 50-60 days or so. But that's a whole 'nother thread.... Kevin Kinsey -- Parallel lines never meet, unless you bend one or both of them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 21:35:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54CD16BAD9 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1297743D73 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:35:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-65-65-115-230.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.65.115.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E758114307 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:29:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:35:41 -0500 From: pauls@utdallas.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200605121236.52992.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <4491F65C-CAB7-4B07-95B9-527677A29E6E@todoo.biz> <20060512122054.77cb6732.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <6BFF1577-071E-4297-82CD-40382ADA8B0F@todoo.biz> <200605121236.52992.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========1973E434798AE35C8E21==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Reducing the size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:35:31 -0000 --==========1973E434798AE35C8E21========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On May 12, 2006 12:36:52 PM -0400 John Nielsen = wrote: > On Friday 12 May 2006 12:28, bsd wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> Most of the files that are "large" seems to be located in /usr/ports/ >> distfiles/ >> >> What will be the effect of deleting some of these files ? > > You will have to download them again if you rebuild / reinstall the > packages that use them. Of course, that happens automatically and > there's a good chance that you'll need a new version next time you > update your installed ports, so go ahead and delete them, especially if > you have a good Internet connection. > And when you install a port, use "make install distclean". That will=20 remove the work directories *and* the distfiles after the port was=20 installed. But, if I were you, I'd backup the box and rebuild with a more sensible=20 partition arrangement. For example, you have 65G of disk space. You could do something likes = this: / 500MB swap 2G /tmp 2G /usr 20G /var 20G /home (the rest) Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========1973E434798AE35C8E21==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 21:51:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4F716BC11 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from goodman@mac.hush.com) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C05043D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:51:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from goodman@mac.hush.com) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost.hushmail.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4068CA332D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailserver5.hushmail.com (mailserver5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.19]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailserver5.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7343633C2C; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 01:51:27 +0400 To: From: "Bob Goodman" Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20060512215128.7343633C2C@mailserver5.hushmail.com> Cc: Terry Stoner Subject: RE: Access from the internet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: goodman@mac.hush.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:51:43 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >Hi my name is Terry Stoner. I just set up a new Firewall, FreeBSD 6.0, and >am having trouble connecting from the internet. Basically I want to ssh >from work. I set sshd_config to listen on all interfaces and on port 21, >this port is not blocked outbound from work. I have ipfilter rules allowing >inbound on this port and interface. I setup port forwarding on my netgear >router. When I do a tcpdump I see myself hitting the interface of my >firewall, but sshd is not responding. I get to my box, but no dice. Do you >have any suggestions? I would appreciate it. > >Thank you, > >Terry Stoner > Are you certain that you allow both inbound traffic to your port 21 and outbound traffic from your port 21? Something with "keep state" in the ipfilters ruleset? Bob Goodman -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.5 wkYEARECAAYFAkRlA08ACgkQAQ09syE0bn45mQCeIcOn0hmTCdKRIEprgN543vJYb80A nig4TZ0WCEqQzJf6tAyiC4O0sTm+ =u018 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 22:00:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9269516A435 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 22:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563D443D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 22:00:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4CLxicq072282; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:59:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060512165738.026575c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:59:38 -0500 To: wc_fbsd@xxiii.com, freeBSD Questions From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20060512163433.02e85298@mailsvr.xxiii.com> References: <4464B95D.1040702@computer.org> <20060512171515.GC34035@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <4464CEDA.80906@computer.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20060512152402.026a60c8@mail.computinginnovations.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20060512163433.02e85298@mailsvr.xxiii.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of running under inetd.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 22:00:35 -0000 Yes it is still true today. The default system now has inetd running nothing. And the ports now install rc scripts for these reasons. For network daemons, when they are running in a listen mode there is no real overhead on the system. -Derek At 03:41 PM 5/12/2006, wc_fbsd@xxiii.com wrote: >At 04:25 PM 5/12/2006, you wrote: >>inetd running is discouraged. Instead run the daemons on boot using rc >>scripts. If you look back in the history, inetd running is a security >>risk, and was discouraged in the 5.X releases. > >Is that still really true? Waaayyy back when, inetd would have all kinds >of dangerous services enabled by default (allowing DOS stuff like spewing >"chargen" into "discard"). > >But that was a configuration issue, and issues with the services it >launched; not with inetd itself. > >The authentication is still done within ftpd. You're just saving the tiny >overhead of running it all the time for occasional use. And inetd does >allow the tcpwrappers for anything it launches (obviously the wrappers are >compiled into many other things now, ftpd included.) > > -Wayne > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 23:40:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5232C16A519 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 23:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nixlists@writemoore.net) Received: from mail.mailsnare.net (v185.mailsnare.net [206.246.200.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C4C43D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 23:40:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nixlists@writemoore.net) Received: from localhost (v185.mailsnare.net [206.246.200.185]) by anti-virus.mailsnare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B299C47C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 23:25:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (63-230-165-204.ptld.qwest.net [63.230.165.204]) by mail.mailsnare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C174014470 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 23:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44651CCA.1050904@writemoore.net> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:39:54 -0700 From: "Michael M." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions mail-list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at mailsnare.net Subject: Dead tree documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:40:06 -0000 I've been using various Linux distros and OS X for a while now, and Windows before those, and am interested in trying out FreeBSD. Call me old fashioned, but as an engaged-but-non-technical user, I find it really useful to have at least some accompanying documentation in book form when embarking on something like this. Okay, forget "old-fashioned," just call me "old." :-) Book-learnin' was the only thing we had when I was a yung-un, and it's what I'm used to. I understand that the be-all-and-end-all of authoritative FreeBSD reference is the online handbook (and, of course, the man pages and docs included with the OS itself). I was wondering if more experienced users could give me a few pointers about the best book supplements for delving into this OS. Specifically, I'm looking for advice about what might be too outdated to be useful (or worse, might end up being more confusing than helpful) and what isn't. From looking around and lurking here for a while, the books that look most promising to me are: "The Complete FreeBSD, 4th Ed." by Greg Lehey "FreeBSD 6 Unleashed" by Brian Tiemann "Absolute BSD" by Michael Lucas "BSD Hacks" by Dru Lavigne The latter, at least, seems like something best left for later, if I really stick with it,. Of the first three -- well, the first is the most appealing to me, but it's somewhat more dated than the others (I have seen the regularly posted reminders about online updates). I'm certainly not averse to buying two books; however, I don't want to drown myself -- keeping in mind that I'm not the most technically inclined person and my purpose is to learn to use FreeBSD as a general-purpose desktop system. I've no special or advanced uses in mind, though I am hoping that ultimately learning more about FreeBSD will also have the benefit of teaching me more about making use of the Darwin subsystem of OS X. Any thoughts, advice, pointers? Anything I missed, especially any general UNIX books that might go well with one of the above? Much obliged. p.s. BTW, I did try out DesktopBSD and am quite impressed with it. It seems like there are still some issues to be addressed; still, it's a really nice introductory way to get up and running with a FreeBSD desktop quickly and easily. As a matter of personal preference, I'm not a big KDE fan, so that tempers my enthusiasm somewhat. I don't think it's really a substitute for trying to learn the basics of using and administering FreeBSD, but then that's probably not what it's trying to be. I hope it progresses and gets lots of support. -- Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream." --S. Jackson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 23:58:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F67416A430 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 23:58:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BF943D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 23:58:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CNwpEA065957; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:58:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <44652135.1030700@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:58:45 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060509 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael M." References: <44651CCA.1050904@writemoore.net> In-Reply-To: <44651CCA.1050904@writemoore.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions mail-list Subject: Re: Dead tree documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:58:53 -0000 Michael M. wrote: > I've been using various Linux distros and OS X for a while now, and > Windows before those, and am interested in trying out FreeBSD. Call me > old fashioned, but as an engaged-but-non-technical user, I find it > really useful to have at least some accompanying documentation in book > form when embarking on something like this. Okay, forget > "old-fashioned," just call me "old." :-) Book-learnin' was the only > thing we had when I was a yung-un, and it's what I'm used to. > > I understand that the be-all-and-end-all of authoritative FreeBSD > reference is the online handbook (and, of course, the man pages and docs > included with the OS itself). I was wondering if more experienced users > could give me a few pointers about the best book supplements for delving > into this OS. Specifically, I'm looking for advice about what might be > too outdated to be useful (or worse, might end up being more confusing > than helpful) and what isn't. From looking around and lurking here for > a while, the books that look most promising to me are: > > "The Complete FreeBSD, 4th Ed." by Greg Lehey > "FreeBSD 6 Unleashed" by Brian Tiemann > "Absolute BSD" by Michael Lucas > "BSD Hacks" by Dru Lavigne > > The latter, at least, seems like something best left for later, if I > really stick with it,. Of the first three -- well, the first is the > most appealing to me, but it's somewhat more dated than the others (I > have seen the regularly posted reminders about online updates). I'm > certainly not averse to buying two books; however, I don't want to drown > myself -- keeping in mind that I'm not the most technically inclined > person and my purpose is to learn to use FreeBSD as a general-purpose > desktop system. I've no special or advanced uses in mind, though I am > hoping that ultimately learning more about FreeBSD will also have the > benefit of teaching me more about making use of the Darwin subsystem of > OS X. > > Any thoughts, advice, pointers? Anything I missed, especially any > general UNIX books that might go well with one of the above? > Well, I can understand, to some extent, where you're coming from. It's much easier to justify throwing the book down beside the bed when you're about to doze off, as opposed to, say, a new laptop. Recently, "Grog" Lehey released "The Complete FreeBSD" under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 license. Source is available, as well as a PDF document. I'm sure he'd appreciate it if you buy a paper copy, but you could print your own, also: http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 00:09:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C33B16A6A4 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CF643D45 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:09:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so672834pya for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:09:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RS7eQ7swFFkP5QIJYAEkgP4rYGFkoR0eoQKeza/1m/17LKBQ4QznUIMH43BFmz+lX4vlnranGzWjdk/IS6JgLt2xtPkBfTUqW7xO+tBQCM6MShBnveHyR6H31sjY9h4sQrfguc5mvETb2p+wSXytCdE+SWO9H65QYcX1kiecCyY= Received: by 10.35.8.1 with SMTP id l1mr424943pyi; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.13.3 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:09:20 -0400 From: "David Stanford" To: "Michael M." In-Reply-To: <44651CCA.1050904@writemoore.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44651CCA.1050904@writemoore.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions mail-list Subject: Re: Dead tree documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:09:23 -0000 On 5/12/06, Michael M. wrote: > I've been using various Linux distros and OS X for a while now, and > Windows before those, and am interested in trying out FreeBSD. Call me > old fashioned, but as an engaged-but-non-technical user, I find it > really useful to have at least some accompanying documentation in book > form when embarking on something like this. Okay, forget > "old-fashioned," just call me "old." :-) Book-learnin' was the only > thing we had when I was a yung-un, and it's what I'm used to. > > I understand that the be-all-and-end-all of authoritative FreeBSD > reference is the online handbook (and, of course, the man pages and docs > included with the OS itself). I was wondering if more experienced users > could give me a few pointers about the best book supplements for delving > into this OS. Specifically, I'm looking for advice about what might be > too outdated to be useful (or worse, might end up being more confusing > than helpful) and what isn't. From looking around and lurking here for > a while, the books that look most promising to me are: > > "The Complete FreeBSD, 4th Ed." by Greg Lehey > "FreeBSD 6 Unleashed" by Brian Tiemann > "Absolute BSD" by Michael Lucas > "BSD Hacks" by Dru Lavigne "The Complete FreeBSD, 4th Ed." by Greg Lehey and "Absolute BSD" by Michael Lucas are fantastic books, but are, unfortunately, a little outdated. "BSD Hacks" is also an extremely useful book, but aimed more at administrators looking to learn a few tricks of the trade. My suggestion would be to wait another week or two when "FreeBSD 6 Unleashed" by Brian Tiemann" is released as it will be the most thorough and up-to-date book out there. > > The latter, at least, seems like something best left for later, if I > really stick with it,. Of the first three -- well, the first is the > most appealing to me, but it's somewhat more dated than the others (I > have seen the regularly posted reminders about online updates). I'm > certainly not averse to buying two books; however, I don't want to drown > myself -- keeping in mind that I'm not the most technically inclined > person and my purpose is to learn to use FreeBSD as a general-purpose > desktop system. I've no special or advanced uses in mind, though I am > hoping that ultimately learning more about FreeBSD will also have the > benefit of teaching me more about making use of the Darwin subsystem of > OS X. If you do plan to purchase two books, I would suggest making The complete FreeBSD the second. As for Mac OS X, I have no clue - never used it. > > Any thoughts, advice, pointers? Anything I missed, especially any > general UNIX books that might go well with one of the above? > > Much obliged. > > p.s. BTW, I did try out DesktopBSD and am quite impressed with it. It > seems like there are still some issues to be addressed; still, it's a > really nice introductory way to get up and running with a FreeBSD > desktop quickly and easily. As a matter of personal preference, I'm not > a big KDE fan, so that tempers my enthusiasm somewhat. I don't think > it's really a substitute for trying to learn the basics of using and > administering FreeBSD, but then that's probably not what it's trying to > be. I hope it progresses and gets lots of support. Have you tried PC-BSD? It also installs defaulted with KDE, which I also am not a fan of, but is really a great fork and looks to have a bright future ahead. http://www.pcbsd.org > > -- > Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA > "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions = of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to drea= m." --S. Jackson -David > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 00:11:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BFC16A744 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACBF43D48 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:11:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (pimout3-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.218]) by ylpvm29.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4D0B0NH030277 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:11:00 -0400 X-ORBL: [67.66.236.79] Received: from [192.168.1.25] (adsl-67-66-236-79.dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net [67.66.236.79]) by pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.6 out.dk/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4D0Bn6w052516 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:11:49 -0400 Message-ID: <44652444.90404@mkproductions.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:11:48 -0500 From: Mark Kane User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020604080506070900050001" Subject: Only One SATA Drive Detected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:11:58 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020604080506070900050001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi everyone. I'm trying to reinstall FreeBSD on a machine that had a hard drive failure early this week. I bought two brand new 80GB Seagate SATA drives to do mirroring and started to put things together this afternoon. I didn't know initially if the onboard SATA controller would work or not, so I only opened one of the drives in case I needed to replace them with PATA drives. I installed FreeBSD on the first drive with no problem, so I proceeded to open and put in the second one. I started the install again so I could set up the mirroring, but only one drive was detected. I checked the BIOS and both are detected there, so I booted back into my install of FreeBSD on the one hard drive and got a dmesg, which is attached. I also tried to install with just one drive on the secondary SATA channel, but the install does not detect that drive at all so it cannot continue in that case. I found someone with the same problem (although different drive company), but there was no solution: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hardware/2006-March/003343.html My hardware is: MSI K8NGM2 (nForce4) 2x Seagate 80GB SATA FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE [i386] So in short, only the primary SATA channel works. Is this fixable? I have not tried 7-CURRENT yet because this is a production workstation, but would be willing to try if you think it would help. Thanks very much in advance! -Mark -- GnuPG Public Key: http://www.mkproductions.org/mk_pubkey.asc Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.net IRC: MIXXnet IRC Network - irc.mixxnet.net (Nick: MIXX941) --------------020604080506070900050001 Content-Type: text/plain; name="dmesg.boot" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dmesg.boot" Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:32:43 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ (1808.24-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x20ff2 Stepping = 2 Features=0x78bfbff Features2=0x1 AMD Features=0xe2500800 AMD Features2=0x1 real memory = 469565440 (447 MB) avail memory = 450105344 (429 MB) MPTable: ioapic0: Assuming intbase of 0 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 cpu0 on motherboard pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.4 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.5 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.6 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.7 (no driver attached) pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 3.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 4.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 9.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 10.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xfeade000-0xfeadefff irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfeadfc00-0xfeadfcff irq 5 at device 11.1 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: EHCI version 1.0 usb1: companion controller, 8 ports each: usb0 usb1: on ehci0 usb1: USB revision 2.0 uhub1: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 13.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xd800-0xd807,0xd480-0xd483,0xd400-0xd407,0xd080-0xd083,0xd000-0xd00f mem 0xfeadd000-0xfeaddfff irq 5 at device 14.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 pcib4: at device 16.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pci4: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) pci4: