From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 00:35:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768A916A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-3.paradise.net.nz (bm-3a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5EF43D49 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:35:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-3.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IYV0080GDMUI5@linda-3.paradise.net.nz> for stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 12:35:18 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-127.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.127]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34262441DB; Sun, 07 May 2006 12:35:17 +1200 (NZST) Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 12:35:17 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <20060506135412.Q91930@carver.gumbysoft.com> To: Doug White Message-id: <445D40C5.7060704@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) References: <445C03E4.80900@paradise.net.nz> <20060506135412.Q91930@carver.gumbysoft.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-RC and the audit group X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 00:35:19 -0000 Doug White wrote: > On Sat, 6 May 2006, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > >> I found that installworld stops, because the 'audit' group has not been >> created. Now I just pressed 'return' for the default actions during >> mergemaster -p, but I didn't notice any mention of the audit group. > > The default action is to do nothing, so its possible you just missed it as > you were blazing through. :-) > > Also, if you didn't delete the temporary directory last time, mergemaster > will ask you if you want to re-use it. 9 times out of 10, the answer is > 'no', but the default may be to save it. > Thanks - I'll look more carefully next time :-). From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 00:49:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1E416A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7249B43D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 00:49:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [88.64.185.59] (helo=amd64.laiers.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu10) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML31I-1FcXSE3ol4-00068i; Sun, 07 May 2006 02:48:59 +0200 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 02:48:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9548604.qRSz6R5HHn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605070248.58024.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Cc: Iantcho Vassilev Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 00:49:04 -0000 --nextPart9548604.qRSz6R5HHn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 07 May 2006 01:59, Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > I noticed such a problem: > > I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf > > pf_enable=3D"YES" > pflogd_enable=3D"YES" > > but when the system boots i test with: > > pfctl -vs rules > > and there are not rules loaded.if i load them by hand there is no problem= =2E. > then i made: > > rc_debug=3D"YES" > > and the first thing that i saw was: when pf_enable is after pflogd_enable= ; > it is not printed(checked).. > > then i changed the place of pf and pflogd in the rc.conf and i saw some > output in the /var/log/messages.. > but still the ruleset wasn`t loaded.. > > i put pf_load=3D"YES" >> /boot/loader.conf > and still the ruleset is NOT loaded on boot... What is your pf.conf like? Do you have ALTQ in use? Do you maybe try to u= se=20 ALTQ on an interface that is created later on (tun0 or the like)? What doe= s=20 "/etc/rc.d/{pf, pflog} rcvar" give you? Does "/etc/rc.d/pf start" work aft= er=20 it failed on boot? Try setting pf_flags=3D"-v" to get additional error=20 messages. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart9548604.qRSz6R5HHn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXUP6XyyEoT62BG0RAoCiAJ4qKAA9ELVt7Xm2SDtr1Lrz1b4fgQCfRin3 adw1lKfzN1F45IPFuPyHnws= =625b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9548604.qRSz6R5HHn-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 01:56:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A6D16A400; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:56:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E41143D45; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:56:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k471uHmj072952; Sat, 6 May 2006 19:56:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <445D53C1.90601@samsco.org> Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 19:56:17 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson References: <4457A02C.9040408@rogers.com> <35c231bf0605032011s65fbb1aby742438465ee98ee7@mail.gmail.com> <20060504033300.GA39935@xor.obsecurity.org> <44598615.3040400@rogers.com> <20060504044758.GA41047@xor.obsecurity.org> <44599732.1050905@rogers.com> <20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl> <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2> <3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Chris , Mike Jakubik , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 01:56:20 -0000 Robert Watson wrote: > > On Sat, 6 May 2006, Chris wrote: > >> are snapshots a default setting? > > > In case people want to avoid using snapshots, here are the uses I'm > currently aware of in the base system: > > - Background file system check uses snapshots. This can be disabled by > using > background_fsck="NO" in /etc/rc.conf. > > - dump uses snapshots if the -L paramater is specified, in order to take an > atomic backup of the system. It won't use snapshots unless explicitly > specified. > > - mksnap_ffs uses snapshots, as it's the operator snapshot creation tool. > > FWIW, I and a moderate number of other people use snapshots daily on > quite busy and over-burdened machines without problems. > > Also, as an FYI, several quota-related snapshot fixes went into CVS in > the last 24-48 hours. Once they've settled for a few weeks, and > assuming they don't have complex dependencies, they will get merged to > RELENG_6. Presumably if there is sufficient demand, and they adequately > address the reports of deadlocks with quotas+snapshots, they could be > merged to RELENG_6_1 as an errata update. Exactly my thinking also. In about 2-3 weeks time, we'll review this and decide what to do. Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 02:05:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F410A16A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACC243D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:05:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4725DHX073001; Sat, 6 May 2006 20:05:14 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <445D55D9.5070701@samsco.org> Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 20:05:13 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <20060505192152.GA17616@soaustin.net> <3aaaa3a0605061326n2f18e38epf6b93f2042385cec@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0605061326n2f18e38epf6b93f2042385cec@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org, linimon@freebsd.org, Mike Jakubik , kris@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 02:05:26 -0000 Chris wrote: > On 05/05/06, Mark Linimon wrote: > >> Make Jakubik wrote: >> >> > FreeBSD users now demand stability and performance, as opposed to an >> > influx of new bells and whistles just before the release [...] I fully >> > understand that this is a volunteer project [...] >> >> I'm sorry, but the former statement proves the latter false. >> >> Let's try to do our Semi-Annual Refresher Course On Open Source >> Development: >> >> The developers (at least 99% of them) work for free. In their own spare >> time. Their motivations vary but I don't believe any of those include >> being in a position to feel they need to respond to demands. That's not >> a positive motivator. If they wanted to be in that position, they could >> just stay at their $realjobs for those extra hours. >> >> Part of their shared goals, however, is to turn out the best system that >> they possibly can, in the hopes that people will find it useful and want >> to contribute back to it. However, there are no guarantees involved, >> implicit or explicit. (If you want to compare and contrast to how much >> "guarantee" you get from closed-source development, please pull out a >> copy >> of your EULA. They barely even "guarantee" that there are bits on the >> CD.) >> >> There's a long process where the developers try to agree on what features >> need to be included and what bugs need to be fixed. From the standpoint >> of the people who attempt to coordinate this process, in technical jargon >> the process is know as "herding cats". I would be able to serve as an >> expert witness in court about this. (Side note: some of the cats hiss, >> bite, and scratch; very few, if any, have _any_ interest in being >> herder.) >> >> There are always tradeoffs between stability and features. During the >> 5.X cycle we managed in some degree to de-optimize both: we had features >> that were only available in an "experimental" branch that some people >> considered critical (wireless, anyone?) while that "experimental" branch >> was unsuitable for production use. The idea was that we would hold on >> to declaring 5.X "STABLE" until all the major bugs were fixed. >> >> And as a consequence, we didn't release for -- what, 2 years? >> >> So we've thrown out the idea of "wait until every possible bug is fixed." >> It leads to rare releases, and larger code chaos, larger instability, and >> allows FreeBSD's detractors to sniff "well, they're never going to >> release >> anything again." (Notice how the "BSD is dying" crowd on Slashdot has >> been a lot quieter since we released 6.0?) >> >> So now what we're doing is trying to come up with more regular (not on >> absolute deadline) releases, with smaller feature sets, to enable smaller >> sets of new code to be debugged simultaneously. >> >> The features that some users see as critical, others don't. (I don't >> have >> quotas enabled; I have disabled soft-updates on the theory that as a >> single >> user I can trade longer startup time for possibly greater error >> recovery). >> >> > I wish i was a good Unix C programmer myself, so i could contribute >> in a >> > more direct way >> >> And there's the rub. The people who _are_ good Unix/C programmers are >> the >> ones doing the work, and as such, feel that they have the final say about >> what goes and what doesn't. While I hope that each of them will >> listen to >> what individual users are saying, and take good suggestions to heart, the >> fact remains that they are under no _obligation_ to do so. >> >> Finally, as has been pointed out already, the interactions between >> quotas, soft-updates, and the rest of the system have problems that are >> probably going to be fairly difficult to isolate and test. Thus, they >> could take days, weeks, or months. If we were to hold the release until >> these were fixed, basically our last 2 months of QA would be out the >> window. This is not a way to keep developers happy; at some point they >> will tire of the inability to work on the things that they find >> interesting, >> and wander off to find something else more fun to do. >> >> Summary: it's too bad that there are regressions, but sometime they're >> a fact of life. If these regressions are in areas that are critical for >> a certain user, that user should just skip 6.1 and wait for 6.2. The >> stability gains that 6.1 have over 6.0 in so many other areas means that >> it's time for 6.1 to go out the door, because for the majority of users >> it's going to be a big win. >> >> As always, we welcome test cases on e.g. non-critical systems, earlier >> in the release process (or between releases), where there's enough time >> to thoroughly test that any proposed fix doesn't cause more problems than >> it cures. Within a few days of release, that simply isn't the case right >> now. >> >> mcl >> _______________________________________________ > > > nice post and ultimately you are correct, I personally would prefere a > higher gap between releases for the following reasons tho. > > 1 - it does increase stability if the extra time is spent fixing bugs > and testing the fixes. > No, actually it doesn't. The real push to get bugs fixed doesn't happen until about 2 weeks into the start of the release cycle. It doesn't matter if it's been 2 months or 2 years since the last release; letting it sit longer absolutely does NOT result in fewer bugs. in fact, it results in MORE bugs, because more happens in the longer gap that needs to be fixed. > 2 - its easier for administration, upgrading freebsd every 2 to 3 > months isnt ideal for administrators. I know releases are supported > for much longer but given what kris told me recently that ports are > only supported on the very latest release I found that a bit worrying. There is nothing forcing users to upgrade at every release. For my company's product, I just updated us to 6.1, and I don't expect to do a full update again until 6.3 or 6.4, other than some small targetted micro-updates as needed. For my production mail and firewall servers, they are running RELENG_6_0, and I probably won't upgrade them until 6.2 or 6.3. > > 3 - it raises profile for the release, the euphoria surrounding a > release is much less if there is one every other month. It was never, ever suggested that there be one release per month. It was planned that there be a release every 18 weeks. There are snapshot builds every month, and that is done to make sure that the releases scripts continue to work, and give the adventurous users something to play with. > > In terms of a new major version ie. 7.x over 6.x I think that should > only be released when their is something major changed like 5.x over > 4.x had a new filesystem smp support etc. and I happen to think > because 5.1 and 5.2 werent STABLE the 5.3 STABLE release turned out > very stable at least in my experience and was more stable then 6.0. 5.1 and 5.2 were not given the 'STABLE' nomenclature. As for 5.3 being "more stable than 6.0", that is a very subjective statement. I can give you a list of at least 500 things that were fixed in between 5.3 and 6.0. Unfortunately, a few things regressed, as often happens. > What > was major difference between 6.0 and 5.4? if I understand it > correctly their has been a lot of work done fixing problems that > existed in 5.x but no new feature to shout about. ULE which was > unfinished in 5.x still remains unfinished in 6.x and I wonder if will > be a unfinished feature in 7.x. You obviously never read the release notes, sorry. MPSAFE VFS was a BIG feature for 6.0. Given that your discussion seems to be headed away from researched facts, I'll just stop here. I won't even recognize your statement about adding Java to the base system. Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 05:48:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC18416A400 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEBC43D4C for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:48:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DC6290C38 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:48:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50306-01 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:48:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87919290C20 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:48:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C2915C77F; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:48:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387F43464E for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:48:27 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 02:48:27 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060507023942.B36981@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: fxp0: ethernet freezes sporatically ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 05:48:28 -0000 g'day ... I've recently started having an issue on my desktop that I've been kinda hounding the cable provider about, but, from their end, they see absolutely no issues ... so I figured I'd see if there was maybe something happening within the OS itself ... Here is the issue ... periodically, for 60-120 secs, my SSH connections to servers in both Panama, Central America and Toronto, Canada, will hang ... seems to be totally random ... Web *appears* to work during that time, and I have Azureas running and *it* appears to keep running during that time ... I suspect that my IMAP connections (fetchmail) are also being affected, since I get the original "timeout" emails from fetchmail ... I am running: FreeBSD 6.1-RC #21: Sun Apr 30 20:56:36 ADT 2006 On: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz (2394.01-MHz 686-class CPU) And my Internet connection is running on: fxp0: As I've mentioned above, I have been bugging my cable company about this, but they can find no reasons on their ends to account for this ... I have a business account, so I'm not dealing with "Residential QoS" issues on this one ... Is there *anything* on the OS side of things that I should be looking at that I may be overlooking? Any known issues with the fxp driver that might be causing this? I've always found it to be a more then stable driver, but things can happen ... Also, please note that I don't have a router between the 'Net and I ... my desktop is our network router, so the fxp device is directly connected ... Thoughts? Thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 06:48:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BE016A402; Sun, 7 May 2006 06:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A9043D53; Sun, 7 May 2006 06:48:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k476mWha019791; Sun, 7 May 2006 10:48:33 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 10:48:32 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Kris Kennaway , Tor Egge In-Reply-To: <20060506233525.GA52731@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20060507104355.K92932@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060504033300.GA39935@xor.obsecurity.org> <44598615.3040400@rogers.com> <20060504044758.GA41047@xor.obsecurity.org> <44599732.1050905@rogers.com> <20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl> <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2> <3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060506233525.GA52731@xor.obsecurity.org> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 07 May 2006 10:48:33 +0400 (MSD) Cc: Chris , Mike Jakubik , stable@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 06:48:36 -0000 On Sat, 6 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK> > Also, as an FYI, several quota-related snapshot fixes went into CVS in the KK> > last 24-48 hours. Once they've settled for a few weeks, and assuming they KK> > don't have complex dependencies, they will get merged to RELENG_6. KK> > Presumably if there is sufficient demand, and they adequately address the KK> > reports of deadlocks with quotas+snapshots, they could be merged to KK> > RELENG_6_1 as an errata update. KK> KK> The fixes seem to indeed correct all the deadlocks I was seeing. I KK> don't have time to produce a 6.x patch now though, but it should be a KK> simple matter for someone else to do. FWIW, for me it is much stabler too, at least in normal load patterns. I'll spend a bit of time to stress-test this on our Samba quota-enabled server during our long weekend (today-to-Tuesday) to catch possible rare races. Thanks Tor and others a lot! Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 07:22:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6B716A402 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:22:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCD243D49 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:22:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-19-236.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.19.236]) by mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k477MZ29025405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 7 May 2006 17:22:35 +1000 Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k477MYQR013841; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:22:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k477MYQt013840; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:22:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:22:34 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20060507072234.GK720@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20060507023942.B36981@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060507023942.B36981@ganymede.hub.org> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0: ethernet freezes sporatically ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 07:22:38 -0000 On Sun, 2006-May-07 02:48:27 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Here is the issue ... periodically, for 60-120 secs, my SSH connections >to servers in both Panama, Central America and Toronto, Canada, will hang >... seems to be totally random ... Presumably there are no messages reported... If the problems are frequent enough, maybe you could try running tcpdump on the network at both ends. That might give you a better idea of what is going wrong. -- Peter Jeremy From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 07:24:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7792216A408 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A74643D53 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:23:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip01.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.5]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IYV00HI3WIMHI21@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 04:23:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip01.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sun, 07 May 2006 04:23:51 -0300 Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 04:22:55 -0300 From: Duane Whitty In-reply-to: <20060507023942.B36981@ganymede.hub.org> To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-id: <445DA04F.4010808@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= References: <20060507023942.B36981@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060503) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0: ethernet freezes sporatically ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 07:24:05 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > g'day ... > > I've recently started having an issue on my desktop that I've been > kinda hounding the cable provider about, but, from their end, they see > absolutely no issues ... so I figured I'd see if there was maybe > something happening within the OS itself ... > > Here is the issue ... periodically, for 60-120 secs, my SSH > connections to servers in both Panama, Central America and Toronto, > Canada, will hang ... seems to be totally random ... > > Web *appears* to work during that time, and I have Azureas running > and *it* appears to keep running during that time ... I suspect that > my IMAP connections (fetchmail) are also being affected, since I get > the original "timeout" emails from fetchmail ... > > I am running: > > FreeBSD 6.1-RC #21: Sun Apr 30 20:56:36 ADT 2006 > > On: > > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz (2394.01-MHz 686-class CPU) > > And my Internet connection is running on: > > fxp0: > > As I've mentioned above, I have been bugging my cable company about > this, but they can find no reasons on their ends to account for this > ... I have a business account, so I'm not dealing with "Residential > QoS" issues on this one ... > > Is there *anything* on the OS side of things that I should be > looking at that I may be overlooking? Any known issues with the fxp > driver that might be causing this? I've always found it to be a more > then stable driver, but things can happen ... > > Also, please note that I don't have a router between the 'Net and I > ... my desktop is our network router, so the fxp device is directly > connected ... > > Thoughts? > > Thanks ... > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Hi, Have you considered it might be an Azureas issue? Older Azureas clients have caused me many headaches on my home network. I understand your network is much more robust than what I am running on. However, Azureas runnign on MS Windows XP clients caused network problems which affected my FreeBSD installation. I never did trace the cause except that when Azureas went away so did the problems. The newest Azureas client seems to play much nicer though and I haven't been experienceing any network issues. The symptoms you describe sound very similar in general to the ones everyone on my network experienced, albeit with different applications in play. Best Regards, Duane Whitty -- duane@greenmeadow.ca From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 08:02:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A509716A404; Sun, 7 May 2006 08:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DFE43D46; Sun, 7 May 2006 08:02:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 85EFC2E9B; Sun, 7 May 2006 03:02:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 03:02:01 -0500 To: Chris Message-ID: <20060507080201.GA15703@soaustin.net> References: <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <20060505192152.GA17616@soaustin.net> <3aaaa3a0605061326n2f18e38epf6b93f2042385cec@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0605061326n2f18e38epf6b93f2042385cec@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org, linimon@freebsd.org, Mike Jakubik , kris@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 08:02:02 -0000 On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 09:26:51PM +0100, Chris wrote: > 1 - it does increase stability if the extra time is spent fixing bugs > and testing the fixes. This assumes that you can persuade committers to focus on bugfixes instead of on other things that they consider more fun. > I happen to think because 5.1 and 5.2 werent STABLE the 5.3 STABLE > release turned out very stable at least in my experience and was more > stable then 6.0. This is the opposite from what most people experience, at least from my experience with the mailing lists and GNATS. 5.3 was somewhat rough, due in part to a large number of things merged into it during the QA cycle. 5.4 was a substantial increase in stability vs. 5.3 without having that many new features. 6.0 had a fair number of advances in the code but by the time it was released, most of the developers had turned their attention away from 5.X and to 6.X. Thus, many people found that not only did 6.0 have more features, it also had had more testing, and a large degree of stability. There were certain cases where things did not work as well as we would have liked; however, for quite a number of people, 6.0 worked better than even 5.4. 6.1 incorporates a large number of fixes more oriented to stability than features. 5.5 incorporates a subset of those, because of the infeasbility of back-merging many of those changes (they would risk more instability). > What was major difference between 6.0 and 5.4? if I understand it > correctly their has been a lot of work done fixing problems that > existed in 5.x but no new feature to shout about. Much of the work was done on internals, which will fix race conditions, increase performance, and add stability in the long run. In particular, the wireless support in 6.0 is (AFAICT) much more advanced than 5.4. > ULE which was unfinished in 5.x still remains unfinished in 6.x and I > wonder if will be a unfinished feature in 7.x. This is completely tangential to the other issues. ULE to some degree is still a research project. If you are not willing to live on the bleeding edge of testing, you probably do not need to be running ULE. > 4 - new features in minor version, why are we discussing an issue where > there isn't enough time to fix some bugs a) there is never enough time to fix all the bugs. b) fixing bugs relies entirely on developer interest. The 5.X experience proved that longer release cycles do not necessarily raise developer interest. > 5 - bug reports not acknowledged. I have submitted a PRs myself and none > have even been acknowledged If they have not been acknowledged by GNATS, you need to email bugmaster@FreeBSD.org and point these out so that we can identify the problem. (If your email has no reverse resolution, your email will not make it to GNATS). If they have been acknowledged by GNATS, then you should understand there there are currently 5,424 PRs in the system (984 are ports PRs; many others are kern/ or bin/). We have far more PRs arrive than we have developers who are willing to spend time working on them. (The arrival rate is somwehere around 40-50/day, 3/4ths of which are ports PRs and can be cleared somewhat more quickly.) If you have any concrete suggestions on how we can get more current developers interested in working on PRs, or some new developers that are primarily interested in working on PRs, please make them. I have been trying to come up with suggestions for a while and haven't come up with much of anything. > Ultimately RELEASE is supposedly the stablest branch. Yet due to a > rush to push out a release to keep people like slashdot happy people > running freebsd servers around the world will suffer problems because > of these bugs and may possibly move to linux as a result. When are we > going to go back to a FreeBSD that just works. Keeping the slashdot crowd happy is merely a side-effect of making releases that fit most user's needs, and in a timely fashion. We have definitely erred in not making them in a timely fashion in the 5.X series; arguably, the push to wait until 'all promised features were complete' failed to meet most users' needs as well. The FreeBSD that "just worked" was release 9 or 10 out of a series that was a far simpler codebase than the current one which runs on systems with ACPI, multiple processors, multiple architectures, and a much larger number of motherboards and peripherals. We are currently ready for release 1 out of the 6 series. If you compare 6.1 to 4.1 you'll find that there is absolutely no comparison at all. > After my rant I will say 6.1 so far has proven to me a lot more stable > then 6.0 Well, this is where the "rubber meets the road" as the expression goes. This seems to be the common experience. (There are certain users who seem to have problems with 6.0/6.1; these seem to be in the minority, and possibly depend only on certain workloads.) And, in addition, most users seem to feel that 6.X is both more feature-complete, and more stable, than 5.X. We continue to do the best that we can; IMHO we make amazing progress with a small number of developers, on a large number of architectures, on several code branches simultaneously, on a bewildering variety of motherboards and peripherals. But we're not going to satisfy everyone. mcl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 08:05:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0B916A402 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 08:05:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from heathrow.savoladns.com (heathrow.savoladns.com [212.12.174.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FB3843D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 08:05:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from ocs.savola.com (ocs.savola.com [222.22.1.211]) by heathrow.savoladns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E25C9585D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:05:45 +0300 (AST) Received: from 222.22.1.191 by ocs.savola.com with ESMTP id 56762651146988470; Sun, 07 May 2006 10:54:30 +0300 From: Yousef Raffah To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-F7RJbKHWCwtge+G4HyI6" Organization: The Savola Group Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 11:05:47 +0300 Message-Id: <1146989147.814.18.camel@localhost.savola.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yraffah@savola.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 08:05:51 -0000 --=-F7RJbKHWCwtge+G4HyI6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm trying to install a new server which has a hardware RAID controller. All I need is a simple working RAID5 setup and this is my first time doing it in FreeBSD. I noticed that /sbin/sysinstall does not support configuring the drives through (g)vinum* therefore, I have to normally partition the "slices" then configure vinum, is that the correct or proper way of having RAID5 configured on the server? I would really appreciate any feedback, links or hints on this as all the documentation I have gone through looks very old, some are from 1997, 2001 and 2003 and some are talking about FreeBSD 4.4.. * http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/vinum/index.html Thanks in advance -- Sincerely, Yousef Raffah Senior Systems Administrator -- Aren't you using Firefox? Get it at http://www.getfirefox.com --=-F7RJbKHWCwtge+G4HyI6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXapbH9IXMb4e6CMRAmeNAJ9zgiyRBk1VEK5DQZ+3tAbePcYZyQCgnJX9 eZ/OtNocN2ydO5KFC/2QfAI= =kIk1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-F7RJbKHWCwtge+G4HyI6-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 08:27:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904B716A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 08:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214C443D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 08:27:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25EE290C38; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:27:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82067-03; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:27:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B426290C2C; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:27:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E7FC45CE31; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:27:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40DB5C78A; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:27:45 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:27:45 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Duane Whitty In-Reply-To: <445DA04F.4010808@greenmeadow.ca> Message-ID: <20060507052550.J36981@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060507023942.B36981@ganymede.hub.org> <445DA04F.4010808@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0: ethernet freezes sporatically ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 08:27:45 -0000 On Sun, 7 May 2006, Duane Whitty wrote: > Have you considered it might be an Azureas issue? That I have, but nice to hear from someone that has experienced similar ... the problems did start *around* the same time ... maybe taking up to many "slots" due to the connections ... Hrmmm ... might try lowering the number of peers possible and see if that helps ... Thx ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 08:57:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E61F16A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 08:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A870C43D4C for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 08:57:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so1337532ugc for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 01:57:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MYnLNs4DEAWjpPH/7lqdWIcB2bQ+BJ/JrOKcN25mBEdRUlYKEEMYKTM7uH4Xj1DJmOV45ku7P723zOyMbYT8w32uOijXKPwz4HM2RvFe9ghm1Xe++pXXT4MqVDWL51DqJrIKDvAjgJFM2ieRyTFY3dK5DiO1z+ZUwnl+tVVdUe8= Received: by 10.78.33.17 with SMTP id g17mr422154hug; Sun, 07 May 2006 01:57:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 01:57:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605070157l2ecdfd45t58fe521d5e248295@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 11:57:42 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200605070248.58024.max@love2party.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> <200605070248.58024.max@love2party.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 08:57:44 -0000 /etc/rc.d/pf rcvar - returns YES my pf doesn`t have any ALTQ use I will try pf_flags -v Any other suggestions... On 5/7/06, Max Laier wrote: > > On Sunday 07 May 2006 01:59, Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > > I noticed such a problem: > > > > I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf > > > > pf_enable=3D"YES" > > pflogd_enable=3D"YES" > > > > but when the system boots i test with: > > > > pfctl -vs rules > > > > and there are not rules loaded.if i load them by hand there is no > problem.. > > then i made: > > > > rc_debug=3D"YES" > > > > and the first thing that i saw was: when pf_enable is after > pflogd_enable ; > > it is not printed(checked).. > > > > then i changed the place of pf and pflogd in the rc.conf and i saw some > > output in the /var/log/messages.. > > but still the ruleset wasn`t loaded.. > > > > i put pf_load=3D"YES" >> /boot/loader.conf > > and still the ruleset is NOT loaded on boot... > > What is your pf.conf like? Do you have ALTQ in use? Do you maybe try to > use > ALTQ on an interface that is created later on (tun0 or the like)? What > does > "/etc/rc.d/{pf, pflog} rcvar" give you? Does "/etc/rc.d/pf start" work > after > it failed on boot? Try setting pf_flags=3D"-v" to get additional error > messages. > > -- > /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org > \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 > X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet > / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 09:03:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B8E16A407 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEC143D53 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:03:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so1338378ugc for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 02:03:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Q1Gw35TUEMaV7wmMwH0HmmHUHYvmpaNv8uoB8YDuRPg3/H3QusHukUdNqhPSFZzDou1u/5O7lE0fRXOSMXcdj3kf5g4lj7sHRjCIDwGVNfyQ9dYkbI4R6qpt3Kc886VUbADcDeaQEh7/p5wMKrTkFK58m5XsRU6OK5AvHPjkCEc= Received: by 10.78.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr421540huq; Sun, 07 May 2006 02:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 02:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605070203p6a278a66tb7a487301769adbb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:03:18 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <18e02bd30605070157l2ecdfd45t58fe521d5e248295@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> <200605070248.58024.max@love2party.net> <18e02bd30605070157l2ecdfd45t58fe521d5e248295@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:03:21 -0000 Also (if i didn`t mentioned it)..with rc_debug set i can`t see the pf being checked at all... in /var/log/messages i have.. May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: checkyesno: inetd_enable is set to NO. May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: checkyesno: hostapd_enable i= s set to NO. May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: run_rc_command: evaluating geli2_start(). May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: checkyesno: ftpd_enable is set to NO. May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: checkyesno: bsnmpd_enable is set to NO. May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: checkyesno: background_fsck is set to YES but nothing about PF. Any suggestions? On 5/7/06, Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > > /etc/rc.d/pf rcvar - returns YES > my pf doesn`t have any ALTQ use > I will try pf_flags -v > > > Any other suggestions... > > > On 5/7/06, Max Laier < max@love2party.net> wrote: > > > > On Sunday 07 May 2006 01:59, Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > > > I noticed such a problem: > > > > > > I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf > > > > > > pf_enable=3D"YES" > > > pflogd_enable=3D"YES" > > > > > > but when the system boots i test with: > > > > > > pfctl -vs rules > > > > > > and there are not rules loaded.if i load them by hand there is no > > problem.. > > > then i made: > > > > > > rc_debug=3D"YES" > > > > > > and the first thing that i saw was: when pf_enable is after > > pflogd_enable ; > > > it is not printed(checked).. > > > > > > then i changed the place of pf and pflogd in the rc.conf and i saw > > some > > > output in the /var/log/messages.. > > > but still the ruleset wasn`t loaded.. > > > > > > i put pf_load=3D"YES" >> /boot/loader.conf > > > and still the ruleset is NOT loaded on boot... > > > > What is your pf.conf like? Do you have ALTQ in use? Do you maybe try > > to use > > ALTQ on an interface that is created later on (tun0 or the like)? What > > does > > "/etc/rc.d/{pf, pflog} rcvar" give you? Does "/etc/rc.d/pf start" work > > after > > it failed on boot? Try setting pf_flags=3D"-v" to get additional error > > messages. > > > > -- > > /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org > > \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 > > X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet > > / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 09:34:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D898316A402 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E500043D4C for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:34:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 May 2006 09:34:26 -0000 Received: from p50911004.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO m2a2.dyndns.org) [80.145.16.4] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 07 May 2006 11:34:26 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5116200520 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:34:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (m2a2.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23933-10 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:34:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2B6A5200734; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:34:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Matthias Andree To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1146989147.814.18.camel@localhost.savola.com> (Yousef Raffah's message of "Sun, 07 May 2006 11:05:47 +0300") References: <1146989147.814.18.camel@localhost.savola.com> X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 11:34:24 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110005 (No Gnus v0.5) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at emma.line.org X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:34:30 -0000 Yousef Raffah writes: > I'm trying to install a new server which has a hardware RAID controller. Hardware RAID controllers such as amr(4) or twe(4) (I've seen LSI MegaRAID SCSI 320-1 and 3Ware Escalade 8006-2 LP, the latter is a 2-port SATA controller and can't do RAID5 for lack of ports) stuff usually presents a whole logical unit as a single SCSI drive (/dev/da0 for the first disk array, /dev/da1 for the second and so on), so you shouldn't need vinum, geom or anything like that - just the driver would suffice. If you need vinum or geom to implement a RAID then chances are your so-called "hardware RAID" is actually fake (fakeraid) and really software RAID. Adaptec "HostRAID" and the RAID in intel's ICH x-R chipsets falls into this fakeraid category. The vendors don't like to present it as software RAID, so that particular bit is extremely hard to find :-( What is the brand and model of your so-called hardware RAID? -- Matthias Andree From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 09:57:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0448216A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from heathrow.savoladns.com (heathrow.savoladns.com [212.12.174.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 242D343D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 09:57:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from ocs.savola.com (ocs.savola.com [222.22.1.211]) by heathrow.savoladns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB7B95872 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:57:47 +0300 (AST) Received: from 222.22.1.191 by ocs.savola.com with ESMTP id 56791721146995202; Sun, 07 May 2006 12:46:42 +0300 From: Yousef Raffah To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <1146989147.814.18.camel@localhost.savola.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cx1e5hlPI4qs2o+jn6QV" Organization: The Savola Group Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 12:57:59 +0300 Message-Id: <1146995879.814.30.camel@localhost.savola.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: Re: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yraffah@savola.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:57:52 -0000 --=-cx1e5hlPI4qs2o+jn6QV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 11:34 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Yousef Raffah writes: >=20 > > I'm trying to install a new server which has a hardware RAID controller= . >=20 > Hardware RAID controllers such as amr(4) or twe(4) (I've seen LSI > MegaRAID SCSI 320-1 and 3Ware Escalade 8006-2 LP, the latter is a 2-port > SATA controller and can't do RAID5 for lack of ports) stuff usually > presents a whole logical unit as a single SCSI drive (/dev/da0 for the > first disk array, /dev/da1 for the second and so on), so you shouldn't > need vinum, geom or anything like that - just the driver would suffice. >=20 > If you need vinum or geom to implement a RAID then chances are your > so-called "hardware RAID" is actually fake (fakeraid) and really > software RAID. Adaptec "HostRAID" and the RAID in intel's ICH x-R > chipsets falls into this fakeraid category. The vendors don't like to > present it as software RAID, so that particular bit is extremely hard to > find :-( >=20 > What is the brand and model of your so-called hardware RAID? >=20 The machine is a compaq server with Smart RAID controller -- Sincerely, Yousef Raffah Senior Systems Administrator -- Aren't you using Firefox? Get it at http://www.getfirefox.com --=-cx1e5hlPI4qs2o+jn6QV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXcSnH9IXMb4e6CMRAmcsAJ45RNsQBoiUkFP7w1Yb2qMPsWYnPACeKHwD TZJQ9f0K1Bc2eCotJ/oyeGw= =FJZH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cx1e5hlPI4qs2o+jn6QV-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 11:00:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9EB16A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BA343D53 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:00:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from royal64.emp.zapto.org (195.198.193.104) by pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.072.1) id 4457C6420012CE7D; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:00:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:00:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5AA@royal64.emp.zapto.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers Thread-Index: AcZxvPpXHkyTWNEBTXqzfg/DJ4qUiAAB5Zsg From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Cc: yraffah@savola.com Subject: RE: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 11:00:59 -0000 Yousef Raffah wrote: > The machine is a compaq server with Smart RAID controller Is the controller recognised by FreeBSD during startup? If it's a SmartArray 5xxx then the 'ciss' driver is the one you want: ciss0: port ... [...] da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device=20 da0: 135.168MB/s transfers da0: 105008MB (215056800 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 26355C) This is a real hardware RAID card, and it presents the array to the system as a regular SCSI disk (da0 above). Just define your array from the card's BIOS and make sure you are running a kernel that has 'ciss' enabled (GENERIC has it by default). /Daniel Eriksson From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 11:59:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCECF16A405 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4703A43D55 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 11:59:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47BxuBJ094770; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:59:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k47BxtZq019949; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:59:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k47BxtWL019948; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:59:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:59:55 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Daniel Eriksson Message-ID: <20060507115955.GA19932@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5AA@royal64.emp.zapto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5AA@royal64.emp.zapto.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: yraffah@savola.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 11:59:59 -0000 On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:00:56PM +0200, Daniel Eriksson wrote.. > Yousef Raffah wrote: > > > The machine is a compaq server with Smart RAID controller > > Is the controller recognised by FreeBSD during startup? > > If it's a SmartArray 5xxx then the 'ciss' driver is the one you want: Or the ida(4) for the older SmartArrays. Like the DL380 (G1 model) for example has. ida(4) does not hook into the SCSI framework though. > ciss0: port ... > [...] > da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da0: 135.168MB/s transfers > da0: 105008MB (215056800 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 26355C) > > This is a real hardware RAID card, and it presents the array to the > system as a regular SCSI disk (da0 above). Just define your array from > the card's BIOS and make sure you are running a kernel that has 'ciss' > enabled (GENERIC has it by default). > > /Daniel Eriksson > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- end of quoted text --- -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 12:05:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9861A16A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from heathrow.savoladns.com (heathrow.savoladns.com [212.12.174.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 881F943D48 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:05:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from ocs.savola.com (ocs.savola.com [222.22.1.211]) by heathrow.savoladns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF52B95854 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:05:48 +0300 (AST) Received: from 222.22.1.191 by ocs.savola.com with ESMTP id 56817731147002884; Sun, 07 May 2006 14:54:44 +0300 From: Yousef Raffah To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5AA@royal64.emp.zapto.org> References: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5AA@royal64.emp.zapto.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Pt81apSs7y1x22BctcDi" Organization: The Savola Group Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 15:06:00 +0300 Message-Id: <1147003560.814.35.camel@localhost.savola.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: RE: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yraffah@savola.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 12:05:52 -0000 --=-Pt81apSs7y1x22BctcDi Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 13:00 +0200, Daniel Eriksson wrote: > Yousef Raffah wrote: >=20 > > The machine is a compaq server with Smart RAID controller >=20 > Is the controller recognised by FreeBSD during startup? >=20 Yes > If it's a SmartArray 5xxx then the 'ciss' driver is the one you want: >=20 > ciss0: port ... > [...] > da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device=20 > da0: 135.168MB/s transfers > da0: 105008MB (215056800 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 26355C) >=20 I have exactly the same output :) > This is a real hardware RAID card, and it presents the array to the > system as a regular SCSI disk (da0 above). Just define your array from > the card's BIOS and make sure you are running a kernel that has 'ciss' > enabled (GENERIC has it by default). >=20 Why should I define it from the card's BIOS? Is it done through the system's startup (F9)? How can I have my volumes configured? Is it after the system is being installed or during installation? Please forgive my newbie questions :| > /Daniel Eriksson Thanks=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Sincerely, Yousef Raffah Senior Systems Administrator -- Aren't you using Firefox? Get it at http://www.getfirefox.com --=-Pt81apSs7y1x22BctcDi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXeKoH9IXMb4e6CMRAhbXAJ91SGcExmvry0tMfIwLhMubksyPOwCgoX/8 NMjvJXfhHyQ5RLwAm3DW6LM= =jpqU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Pt81apSs7y1x22BctcDi-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 12:30:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B700E16A403 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAAC43D5C for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1FciOn-0009lX-CL for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 May 2006 15:30:09 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 15:30:09 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Subject: rijndael_set_key missrepresented X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 12:30:16 -0000 the include /usr/include/crypto/rijndael.h seems to belong to src/sys/crypto/rijndael.h while the one in /usr/lib/libssh.a seems to want src/crypto/openssh/rijndael.h unless, ofcource, im wrong :-) danny From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 12:49:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0641916A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:49:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A24543D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:49:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so1532ugc for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 05:49:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=UZ7UO6X0n1ONEwix1jcQCWhYA8D0HIiCK6nwb/eKXojC1dOI4Cu0r6f6/nhfjFSjMH1glPYEwJcLS9Nkc75pyCfBgjKBVwFszLckvH8LOKxw1Yw+YU4HL0E8pICAFnE0ZfyjWOiGRF4ToJD8hNQWLEzFJOYyS6a/k/5GZ2mA1pQ= Received: by 10.78.21.7 with SMTP id 7mr442441huu; Sun, 07 May 2006 05:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 05:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605070549u349265a3i92499cbec59479bc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:49:08 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <445DD8DA.5000207@pp.nic.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> <445DD8DA.5000207@pp.nic.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 12:49:10 -0000 On 5/7/06, Pertti Kosunen wrote: > > Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > > Hello to all, > > > > > > I noticed such a problem: > > > > I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf > > > > pf_enable=3D"YES" > > pflogd_enable=3D"YES" > > pf_rules=3D"/etc/pf.conf" # rules definition file for pf > > I have also that line in /etc/rc.conf . I have added this long time ago... still the result is the same.. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 13:22:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016BA16A40B for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E8243D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:22:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47DMQeU058716; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:22:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 768A4B84B; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:22:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:22:26 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Iantcho Vassilev Message-ID: <20060507132226.GA30723@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Iantcho Vassilev , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> <445DD8DA.5000207@pp.nic.fi> <18e02bd30605070549u349265a3i92499cbec59479bc@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18e02bd30605070549u349265a3i92499cbec59479bc@mail.gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 13:22:29 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:49:08PM +0300, Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > On 5/7/06, Pertti Kosunen wrote: > > > >Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > >> Hello to all, > >> > >> > >> I noticed such a problem: > >> > >> I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf > >> > >> pf_enable=3D"YES" > >> pflogd_enable=3D"YES" This last line should be: pflog_enable=3D"YES" HTH, Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXfSSEnfvsMMhpyURApMIAKCaI7WSOIuwjADhFzHK3dXQbK8LhwCghb3V CFs46COJK9oxrCgixhlUZRM= =qATd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 13:56:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB00416A44B for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3616443D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 13:56:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from royal64.emp.zapto.org (195.198.193.104) by pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.072.1) id 4457C757001316F2; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:56:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:56:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5AB@royal64.emp.zapto.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers Thread-Index: AcZxz691zxIbpV0fSkmyHGajUx/0WQADRsIg From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Cc: yraffah@savola.com Subject: RE: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 13:56:05 -0000 Yousef Raffah wrote: > Why should I define it from the card's BIOS? Because there are no utilities in FreeBSD to configure the array during runtime. Your only option is to do it from the BIOS when you boot your computer. > Is it done through the system's startup (F9)? Just boot your server and wait for the BIOS screen for the card to pop up. It will tell you what key to press to enter BIOS. I don't remember what key it is off the top of my head. > How can I have my volumes configured? Is it after the system is being > installed or during installation? Please forgive my newbie=20 > questions :| You need to configure your arrays BEFORE you install FreeBSD. Once the arrays have been set up properly you can install FreeBSD. Because the card presents each array that you have defined as a regular disk to the system, just select the appropriate disk (most likely da0) during sysinstall to get FreeBSD to partition/slice it up for you. /Daniel Eriksson From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 14:47:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C04916A49A for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 14:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4043543D49 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 14:47:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so20646ugc for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=jg9rs3oaH5nzr0IOxDkEjofpjb75QLdf4iK4MFdn2sNySvXdZso5lGzIi0UQUWu5XJgvFaWjB5rF8/c9GSyv3E5byxtqSogK/SU2rnx6uYeqd0bNhxxM34Aa6tejb1Det6b6knTYae7HXO3DdsWjpZQWeMIYoTnmg6WPcv4IYp8= Received: by 10.78.51.16 with SMTP id y16mr455529huy; Sun, 07 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605070747h28318aaehc85f66a2fcf59043@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:47:41 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060507132226.GA30723@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> <445DD8DA.5000207@pp.nic.fi> <18e02bd30605070549u349265a3i92499cbec59479bc@mail.gmail.com> <20060507132226.GA30723@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 14:47:43 -0000 My mistake.. Is is actually pflog_enable=3D"YES".... also i checked the /etc/rc.d/pf file permission =3D> 755... I just don`t know On 5/7/06, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:49:08PM +0300, Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > > On 5/7/06, Pertti Kosunen wrote: > > > > > >Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > > >> Hello to all, > > >> > > >> > > >> I noticed such a problem: > > >> > > >> I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf > > >> > > >> pf_enable=3D"YES" > > >> pflogd_enable=3D"YES" > > This last line should be: > > pflog_enable=3D"YES" > > HTH, Roland > -- > R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 15:26:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EBA16A400; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D25543D45; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:26:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47FQtlu023650; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:26:56 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:26:55 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Kris Kennaway , Tor Egge In-Reply-To: <20060507104355.K92932@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: <20060507175330.H19670@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060504033300.GA39935@xor.obsecurity.org> <44598615.3040400@rogers.com> <20060504044758.GA41047@xor.obsecurity.org> <44599732.1050905@rogers.com> <20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl> <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2> <3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060506233525.GA52731@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060507104355.K92932@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 07 May 2006 19:26:56 +0400 (MSD) Cc: Chris , Mike Jakubik , stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 15:26:59 -0000 On Sun, 7 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> KK> > Also, as an FYI, several quota-related snapshot fixes went into CVS in the DM> KK> > last 24-48 hours. Once they've settled for a few weeks, and assuming they DM> KK> > don't have complex dependencies, they will get merged to RELENG_6. DM> KK> > Presumably if there is sufficient demand, and they adequately address the DM> KK> > reports of deadlocks with quotas+snapshots, they could be merged to DM> KK> > RELENG_6_1 as an errata update. DM> KK> DM> KK> The fixes seem to indeed correct all the deadlocks I was seeing. I DM> KK> don't have time to produce a 6.x patch now though, but it should be a DM> KK> simple matter for someone else to do. DM> DM> FWIW, for me it is much stabler too, at least in normal load patterns. I'll DM> spend a bit of time to stress-test this on our Samba quota-enabled server DM> during our long weekend (today-to-Tuesday) to catch possible rare races. Alas, it is locked again: root@office:~# ps axlww | grep snap 0 32 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:04.55 [bufdaemon] 0 35 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:01.11 [softdepflush] 0 45080 45061 0 -4 0 5980 2768 snaplk D ?? 0:00.09 /usr/local/sbin/smbd -D 0 46040 46039 0 -4 0 4492 3616 snaplk D+ p1 0:15.04 rsync -av /ar/winroot/distrib/ /st/winroot/tmp/distrib-temp/ 1002 46116 726 0 -4 0 1612 1144 snaplk D+ p3 0:00.00 ls -GF -la /st/.snap/ Unfortunately, this was with non-debug kernel. I'm trying to reproduce the lock with debug kernel right now, but still with no luck - sometimes machine is almost hangs but up to now revives 4 or 5 times. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 15:40:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B70D16A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from fw.zoral.com.ua (ll-227.216.82.212.sovam.net.ua [212.82.216.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8ED43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:40:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k47FeUwT051202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 May 2006 18:40:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47FeUbJ083379; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:40:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k47FeTCU083182; Sun, 7 May 2006 18:40:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:40:29 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Dmitry Morozovsky Message-ID: <20060507154029.GA12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <44599732.1050905@rogers.com> <20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl> <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2> <3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060506233525.GA52731@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060507104355.K92932@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507175330.H19670@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060507175330.H19670@woozle.rinet.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.1, clamav-milter version 0.88.1 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on fw.zoral.com.ua Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 15:40:38 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:26:55PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: >=20 > DM> KK> > Also, as an FYI, several quota-related snapshot fixes went into= CVS in the=20 > DM> KK> > last 24-48 hours. Once they've settled for a few weeks, and as= suming they=20 > DM> KK> > don't have complex dependencies, they will get merged to RELENG= _6.=20 > DM> KK> > Presumably if there is sufficient demand, and they adequately a= ddress the=20 > DM> KK> > reports of deadlocks with quotas+snapshots, they could be merge= d to=20 > DM> KK> > RELENG_6_1 as an errata update. > DM> KK>=20 > DM> KK> The fixes seem to indeed correct all the deadlocks I was seeing. = I > DM> KK> don't have time to produce a 6.x patch now though, but it should = be a > DM> KK> simple matter for someone else to do. > DM>=20 > DM> FWIW, for me it is much stabler too, at least in normal load patterns= . I'll=20 > DM> spend a bit of time to stress-test this on our Samba quota-enabled se= rver=20 > DM> during our long weekend (today-to-Tuesday) to catch possible rare rac= es. >=20 > Alas, it is locked again: >=20 > root@office:~# ps axlww | grep snap > 0 32 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:04.55 [bufd= aemon] > 0 35 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:01.11 [soft= depflush] > 0 45080 45061 0 -4 0 5980 2768 snaplk D ?? 0:00.09 /usr/= local/sbin/smbd -D > 0 46040 46039 0 -4 0 4492 3616 snaplk D+ p1 0:15.04 rsync= -av /ar/winroot/distrib/ /st/winroot/tmp/distrib-temp/ > 1002 46116 726 0 -4 0 1612 1144 snaplk D+ p3 0:00.00 ls -G= F -la /st/.snap/ >=20 > Unfortunately, this was with non-debug kernel. I'm trying to reproduce th= e lock=20 > with debug kernel right now, but still with no luck - sometimes machine i= s=20 > almost hangs but up to now revives 4 or 5 times. >=20 So, you are running CURRENT ? Or did you manually backported changes from CURRENT to 6-STABLE ? Note that none of the relevant commits where MFCed still. --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXhTsC3+MBN1Mb4gRAs2ZAKCg37GAtn8fSt9lr3hhL1u7OxlXqACdHpiH vTRzbF30LwmF2aBcU4qFO1Y= =tvif -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 15:59:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59E716A404 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76FA43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47FxXCf024611; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:59:33 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:59:33 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Konstantin Belousov In-Reply-To: <20060507154029.GA12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Message-ID: <20060507195831.A19670@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <44599732.1050905@rogers.com> <20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl> <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2> <3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060506233525.GA52731@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060507104355.K92932@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507175330.H19670@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507154029.GA12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 07 May 2006 19:59:33 +0400 (MSD) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 15:59:35 -0000 On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote: KB> > Alas, it is locked again: KB> > KB> > root@office:~# ps axlww | grep snap KB> > 0 32 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:04.55 [bufdaemon] KB> > 0 35 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:01.11 [softdepflush] KB> > 0 45080 45061 0 -4 0 5980 2768 snaplk D ?? 0:00.09 /usr/local/sbin/smbd -D KB> > 0 46040 46039 0 -4 0 4492 3616 snaplk D+ p1 0:15.04 rsync -av /ar/winroot/distrib/ /st/winroot/tmp/distrib-temp/ KB> > 1002 46116 726 0 -4 0 1612 1144 snaplk D+ p3 0:00.00 ls -GF -la /st/.snap/ KB> > KB> > Unfortunately, this was with non-debug kernel. I'm trying to reproduce the lock KB> > with debug kernel right now, but still with no luck - sometimes machine is KB> > almost hangs but up to now revives 4 or 5 times. KB> > KB> So, you are running CURRENT ? Or did you manually backported changes KB> from CURRENT to 6-STABLE ? Note that none of the relevant commits KB> where MFCed still. I'm running RELENG_6 with hand-merged sys/ufs/ffs changes from 1 to 7 May. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:08:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3270916A41F for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from fw.zoral.com.ua (ll-227.216.82.212.sovam.net.ua [212.82.216.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958D543D77 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:08:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k47G8LTY051763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 May 2006 19:08:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47G8L8i063663; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:08:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k47G8Kdb063662; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:08:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:08:20 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Dmitry Morozovsky Message-ID: <20060507160820.GB12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2> <3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060506233525.GA52731@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060507104355.K92932@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507175330.H19670@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507154029.GA12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060507195831.A19670@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060507195831.A19670@woozle.rinet.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.1, clamav-milter version 0.88.1 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on fw.zoral.com.ua Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:08:44 -0000 --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:59:33PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >=20 > KB> > Alas, it is locked again: > KB> >=20 > KB> > root@office:~# ps axlww | grep snap > KB> > 0 32 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:04.55= [bufdaemon] > KB> > 0 35 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:01.11= [softdepflush] > KB> > 0 45080 45061 0 -4 0 5980 2768 snaplk D ?? 0:00.09= /usr/local/sbin/smbd -D > KB> > 0 46040 46039 0 -4 0 4492 3616 snaplk D+ p1 0:15.04= rsync -av /ar/winroot/distrib/ /st/winroot/tmp/distrib-temp/ > KB> > 1002 46116 726 0 -4 0 1612 1144 snaplk D+ p3 0:00.00= ls -GF -la /st/.snap/ > KB> >=20 > KB> > Unfortunately, this was with non-debug kernel. I'm trying to reprod= uce the lock=20 > KB> > with debug kernel right now, but still with no luck - sometimes mac= hine is=20 > KB> > almost hangs but up to now revives 4 or 5 times. > KB> >=20 > KB> So, you are running CURRENT ? Or did you manually backported changes > KB> from CURRENT to 6-STABLE ? Note that none of the relevant commits > KB> where MFCed still. >=20 > I'm running RELENG_6 with hand-merged sys/ufs/ffs changes from 1 to 7 May. It would be great to show the patchset. Also note that relevant changes are not limited to ufs/ffs. For instance, rev. 1.671 of kern/vfs_subr.c is also important, as well as rev. 1.82 of ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c, that deals explicitely with combination of snapshots and quotas. --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXhtzC3+MBN1Mb4gRAnOlAJ48y9fiwhm8c0wJ/VjQ09meC7sPuACeJ4DI +yQFjq7fiLCPJmkmfE6wI4o= =tNry -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:29:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8092216A402 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:29:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56F643D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:29:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47GT8jk025388; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:29:08 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:29:08 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Konstantin Belousov In-Reply-To: <20060507160820.GB12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Message-ID: <20060507202808.P19670@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2> <3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060506233525.GA52731@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060507104355.K92932@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507175330.H19670@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507154029.GA12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060507195831.A19670@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507160820.GB12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1037833276-1147019348=:19670" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 07 May 2006 20:29:08 +0400 (MSD) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:29:12 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1037833276-1147019348=:19670 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote: KB> > I'm running RELENG_6 with hand-merged sys/ufs/ffs changes from 1 to 7 May. KB> It would be great to show the patchset. Also note that relevant changes are KB> not limited to ufs/ffs. For instance, rev. 1.671 of kern/vfs_subr.c is KB> also important, as well as rev. 1.82 of ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c, that KB> deals explicitely with combination of snapshots and quotas. Actually I did (see attachment) ;-) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --0-1037833276-1147019348=:19670 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=ffs-releng6-20060506.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20060507202908.J19670@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ffs-releng6-20060506.patch SW5kZXg6IGtlcm4vdmZzX3N1YnIuYw0KPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PQ0KUkNTIGZpbGU6IC9ob21lL25jdnMvc3JjL3N5cy9rZXJuL3Zmc19zdWJy LmMsdg0KcmV0cmlldmluZyByZXZpc2lvbiAxLjYzNS4yLjE2LjIuMQ0KZGlm ZiAtdSAtcjEuNjM1LjIuMTYuMi4xIHZmc19zdWJyLmMNCi0tLSBrZXJuL3Zm c19zdWJyLmMJNCBNYXkgMjAwNiAwNzo0MjoxMCAtMDAwMAkxLjYzNS4yLjE2 LjIuMQ0KKysrIGtlcm4vdmZzX3N1YnIuYwk3IE1heSAyMDA2IDE2OjI3OjUy IC0wMDAwDQpAQCAtMjgzOSw3ICsyODM5LDYgQEANCiAJc3RydWN0IHZub2Rl ICp2cCwgKm12cDsNCiAJc3RydWN0IHZtX29iamVjdCAqb2JqOw0KIA0KLQko dm9pZCkgdm5fc3RhcnRfd3JpdGUoTlVMTCwgJm1wLCBWX1dBSVQpOw0KIAlN TlRfSUxPQ0sobXApOw0KIAlNTlRfVk5PREVfRk9SRUFDSCh2cCwgbXAsIG12 cCkgew0KIAkJVklfTE9DSyh2cCk7DQpAQCAtMjg3MCw3ICsyODY5LDYgQEAN CiAJCQlWSV9VTkxPQ0sodnApOw0KIAl9DQogCU1OVF9JVU5MT0NLKG1wKTsN Ci0Jdm5fZmluaXNoZWRfd3JpdGUobXApOw0KIH0NCiANCiAvKg0KSW5kZXg6 IHVmcy9mZnMvZmZzX3Jhd3JlYWQuYw0KPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PQ0KUkNTIGZpbGU6IC9ob21lL25jdnMvc3JjL3N5cy91ZnMvZmZzL2Zmc19y YXdyZWFkLmMsdg0KcmV0cmlldmluZyByZXZpc2lvbiAxLjI1LjIuMg0KZGlm ZiAtdSAtcjEuMjUuMi4yIGZmc19yYXdyZWFkLmMNCi0tLSB1ZnMvZmZzL2Zm c19yYXdyZWFkLmMJOSBNYXIgMjAwNiAwMDoxODo0NSAtMDAwMAkxLjI1LjIu Mg0KKysrIHVmcy9mZnMvZmZzX3Jhd3JlYWQuYwk3IE1heSAyMDA2IDE2OjI3 OjU2IC0wMDAwDQpAQCAtMTI5LDggKzEyOSwxNiBAQA0KIAkJCXVwZ3JhZGVk ID0gMDsNCiAJCQkNCiAJCQ0KLQkJLyogQXR0ZW1wdCB0byBtc3luYyBtbWFw KCkgcmVnaW9ucyB0byBjbGVhbiBkaXJ0eSBtbWFwICovIA0KIAkJVklfTE9D Syh2cCk7DQorCQkvKiBDaGVjayBpZiB2bm9kZSB3YXMgcmVjbGFpbWVkIHdo aWxlIHVubG9ja2VkLiAqLw0KKwkJaWYgKCh2cC0+dl9pZmxhZyAmIFZJX0RP T01FRCkgIT0gMCkgew0KKwkJCVZJX1VOTE9DSyh2cCk7DQorCQkJaWYgKHVw Z3JhZGVkICE9IDApDQorCQkJCVZPUF9MT0NLKHZwLCBMS19ET1dOR1JBREUs IHRkKTsNCisJCQl2bl9maW5pc2hlZF93cml0ZShtcCk7DQorCQkJcmV0dXJu IChFSU8pOw0KKwkJfQ0KKwkJLyogQXR0ZW1wdCB0byBtc3luYyBtbWFwKCkg cmVnaW9ucyB0byBjbGVhbiBkaXJ0eSBtbWFwICovIA0KIAkJaWYgKCh2cC0+ dl9pZmxhZyAmIFZJX09CSkRJUlRZKSAhPSAwKSB7DQogCQkJVklfVU5MT0NL KHZwKTsNCiAJCQlpZiAodnAtPnZfb2JqZWN0ICE9IE5VTEwpIHsNCkBAIC0x NTAsNiArMTU4LDcgQEANCiAJCQlWSV9VTkxPQ0sodnApOw0KIAkJCWlmICh1 cGdyYWRlZCAhPSAwKQ0KIAkJCQlWT1BfTE9DSyh2cCwgTEtfRE9XTkdSQURF LCB0ZCk7DQorCQkJdm5fZmluaXNoZWRfd3JpdGUobXApOw0KIAkJCXJldHVy biAoZXJyb3IpOw0KIAkJfQ0KIAkJLyogRmx1c2ggZGlydHkgYnVmZmVycyAq Lw0KQEAgLTE1OSw2ICsxNjgsNyBAQA0KIAkJCWlmICgoZXJyb3IgPSBmZnNf c3luY3Zub2RlKHZwLCBNTlRfV0FJVCkpICE9IDApIHsNCiAJCQkJaWYgKHVw Z3JhZGVkICE9IDApDQogCQkJCQlWT1BfTE9DSyh2cCwgTEtfRE9XTkdSQURF LCB0ZCk7DQorCQkJCXZuX2ZpbmlzaGVkX3dyaXRlKG1wKTsNCiAJCQkJcmV0 dXJuIChlcnJvcik7DQogCQkJfQ0KIAkJCVZJX0xPQ0sodnApOw0KSW5kZXg6 IHVmcy9mZnMvZmZzX3NuYXBzaG90LmMNCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT0NClJDUyBmaWxlOiAvaG9tZS9uY3ZzL3NyYy9zeXMvdWZzL2Zmcy9mZnNf c25hcHNob3QuYyx2DQpyZXRyaWV2aW5nIHJldmlzaW9uIDEuMTAzLjIuNQ0K ZGlmZiAtdSAtcjEuMTAzLjIuNSBmZnNfc25hcHNob3QuYw0KLS0tIHVmcy9m ZnMvZmZzX3NuYXBzaG90LmMJMjIgTWFyIDIwMDYgMTc6NDI6MzEgLTAwMDAJ MS4xMDMuMi41DQorKysgdWZzL2Zmcy9mZnNfc25hcHNob3QuYwk3IE1heSAy MDA2IDE2OjI3OjU2IC0wMDAwDQpAQCAtMzYsNiArMzYsOCBAQA0KICNpbmNs dWRlIDxzeXMvY2RlZnMuaD4NCiBfX0ZCU0RJRCgiJEZyZWVCU0Q6IHNyYy9z eXMvdWZzL2Zmcy9mZnNfc25hcHNob3QuYyx2IDEuMTAzLjIuNSAyMDA2LzAz LzIyIDE3OjQyOjMxIHRlZ2dlIEV4cCAkIik7DQogDQorI2luY2x1ZGUgIm9w dF9xdW90YS5oIg0KKw0KICNpbmNsdWRlIDxzeXMvcGFyYW0uaD4NCiAjaW5j bHVkZSA8c3lzL2tlcm5lbC5oPg0KICNpbmNsdWRlIDxzeXMvc3lzdG0uaD4N CkBAIC0xMDQsNiArMTA2LDcgQEANCiAgICAgc3RydWN0IGZzICosIHVmc19s Ym5fdCwgaW50KTsNCiBzdGF0aWMgaW50IHJlYWRibG9jayhzdHJ1Y3Qgdm5v ZGUgKnZwLCBzdHJ1Y3QgYnVmICosIHVmczJfZGFkZHJfdCk7DQogc3RhdGlj IHZvaWQgcHJvY2Vzc19kZWZlcnJlZF9pbmFjdGl2ZShzdHJ1Y3QgbW91bnQg Kik7DQorc3RhdGljIHZvaWQgdHJ5X2ZyZWVfc25hcGRhdGEoc3RydWN0IHZu b2RlICpkZXZ2cCwgc3RydWN0IHRocmVhZCAqdGQpOw0KIA0KIC8qDQogICog VG8gZW5zdXJlIHRoZSBjb25zaXN0ZW5jeSBvZiBzbmFwc2hvdHMgYWNyb3Nz IGNyYXNoZXMsIHdlIG11c3QNCkBAIC0zMDYsNiArMzA5LDE4IEBADQogCQlp ZiAoZXJyb3IpDQogCQkJZ290byBvdXQ7DQogCX0NCisjaWZkZWYgUVVPVEEN CisJLyoNCisJICogVHVybiBvZmYgZGlzayBxdW90YXMgZm9yIHNuYXBzaG90 IGZpbGUuDQorCSAqLw0KKwkodm9pZCkgY2hrZHEoaXAsIC1ESVAoaXAsIGlf YmxvY2tzKSwgS0VSTkNSRUQsIEZPUkNFKTsNCisJZm9yIChpID0gMDsgaSA8 IE1BWFFVT1RBUzsgaSsrKSB7DQorCQlpZiAoaXAtPmlfZHF1b3RbaV0gIT0g Tk9EUVVPVCkgew0KKwkJCWRxcmVsZSh2cCwgaXAtPmlfZHF1b3RbaV0pOw0K KwkJCWlwLT5pX2RxdW90W2ldID0gTk9EUVVPVDsNCisJCX0NCisJfQ0KKyNl bmRpZg0KIAkvKg0KIAkgKiBDaGFuZ2UgaW5vZGUgdG8gc25hcHNob3QgdHlw ZSBmaWxlLg0KIAkgKi8NCkBAIC0zNDgsNiArMzYzLDExIEBADQogCQl2bl9z dGFydF93cml0ZShOVUxMLCAmd3J0bXAsIFZfV0FJVCk7DQogCX0NCiAJdm5f bG9jayh2cCwgTEtfRVhDTFVTSVZFIHwgTEtfUkVUUlksIHRkKTsNCisJaWYg KGlwLT5pX2VmZm5saW5rID09IDApIHsNCisJCWVycm9yID0gRU5PRU5UOwkJ LyogU25hcHNob3QgZmlsZSB1bmxpbmtlZCAqLw0KKwkJc24gPSBOVUxMOw0K KwkJZ290byBvdXQxOw0KKwl9DQogCWlmIChjb2xsZWN0c25hcHN0YXRzKQ0K IAkJbmFub3RpbWUoJnN0YXJ0dGltZSk7DQogCS8qDQpAQCAtNTUxLDcgKzU3 MSw2IEBADQogCX0NCiAJbG9ja21ncih2cC0+dl92bmxvY2ssIExLX0lOVEVS TE9DSyB8IExLX0VYQ0xVU0lWRSB8IExLX1JFVFJZLA0KIAkgICAgVklfTVRY KHZwKSwgdGQpOw0KLQl0cmFuc2ZlcmxvY2tlcnMoJnZwLT52X2xvY2ssIHZw LT52X3ZubG9jayk7DQogCWxvY2ttZ3IoJnZwLT52X2xvY2ssIExLX1JFTEVB U0UsIE5VTEwsIHRkKTsNCiAJLyoNCiAJICogSWYgdGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgZmly c3Qgc25hcHNob3Qgb24gdGhpcyBmaWxlc3lzdGVtLCB0aGVuIHdlIG5lZWQN CkBAIC03MDcsMTIgKzcyNiwxNyBAQA0KIAkgKiB0aGUgaW5vZGUgZm9yIHRo aXMgc25hcHNob3QgdGhlbiBhIGRlYWRsb2NrIGNhbiBvY2N1ci4gRHJvcA0K IAkgKiB0aGUgc25hcHNob3QgbG9jayB1bnRpbCB0aGUgYnVmZmVyIGhhcyBi ZWVuIHdyaXR0ZW4uDQogCSAqLw0KKwlWUkVGKHZwKTsJLyogUHJvdGVjdCBh Z2FpbnN0IGZmc19zbmFwZ29uZSgpICovDQogCVZPUF9VTkxPQ0sodnAsIDAs IHRkKTsNCiAJKHZvaWQpIGJyZWFkKGlwLT5pX2RldnZwLA0KIAkJICAgICBm c2J0b2RiKGZzLCBpbm9fdG9fZnNiYShmcywgaXAtPmlfbnVtYmVyKSksDQog CQkgICAgIChpbnQpIGZzLT5mc19ic2l6ZSwgTk9DUkVELCAmbmJwKTsNCiAJ YnJlbHNlKG5icCk7DQogCXZuX2xvY2sodnAsIExLX0VYQ0xVU0lWRSB8IExL X1JFVFJZLCB0ZCk7DQorCWlmIChpcC0+aV9lZmZubGluayA9PSAwKQ0KKwkJ ZXJyb3IgPSBFTk9FTlQ7CQkvKiBTbmFwc2hvdCBmaWxlIHVubGlua2VkICov DQorCWVsc2UNCisJCXZyZWxlKHZwKTsJCS8qIERyb3AgZXh0cmEgcmVmZXJl bmNlICovDQogZG9uZToNCiAJRlJFRShjb3B5X2ZzLT5mc19jc3AsIE1fVUZT TU5UKTsNCiAJYmF3cml0ZShzYnApOw0KQEAgLTE0NjksMTggKzE0OTMsMTYg QEANCiB7DQogCXN0cnVjdCBpbm9kZSAqaXA7DQogCXN0cnVjdCB2bm9kZSAq ZGV2dnA7DQotCXN0cnVjdCBsb2NrICpsa3A7DQogCXN0cnVjdCBidWYgKmli cDsNCiAJc3RydWN0IGZzICpmczsNCiAJc3RydWN0IHRocmVhZCAqdGQgPSBj dXJ0aHJlYWQ7DQotCXVmczJfZGFkZHJfdCBudW1ibGtzLCBibGtubywgZGJs aywgKnNuYXBibGtsaXN0Ow0KKwl1ZnMyX2RhZGRyX3QgbnVtYmxrcywgYmxr bm8sIGRibGs7DQogCWludCBlcnJvciwgbG9jLCBsYXN0Ow0KIAlzdHJ1Y3Qg c25hcGRhdGEgKnNuOw0KIA0KIAlpcCA9IFZUT0kodnApOw0KIAlmcyA9IGlw LT5pX2ZzOw0KIAlkZXZ2cCA9IGlwLT5pX2RldnZwOw0KLQlzbiA9IGRldnZw LT52X3JkZXYtPnNpX3NuYXBkYXRhOw0KIAkvKg0KIAkgKiBJZiBhY3RpdmUs IGRlbGV0ZSBmcm9tIGluY29yZSBsaXN0ICh0aGlzIHNuYXBzaG90IG1heQ0K IAkgKiBhbHJlYWR5IGhhdmUgYmVlbiBpbiB0aGUgcHJvY2VzcyBvZiBiZWlu ZyBkZWxldGVkLCBzbw0KQEAgLTE0ODgsMjkgKzE1MTAsMjMgQEANCiAJICoN CiAJICogQ2xlYXIgY29weS1vbi13cml0ZSBmbGFnIGlmIGxhc3Qgc25hcHNo b3QuDQogCSAqLw0KKwlWSV9MT0NLKGRldnZwKTsNCiAJaWYgKGlwLT5pX25l eHRzbmFwLnRxZV9wcmV2ICE9IDApIHsNCi0JCWxvY2ttZ3IoJnZwLT52X2xv Y2ssIExLX0VYQ0xVU0lWRSwgTlVMTCwgdGQpOw0KLQkJVklfTE9DSyhkZXZ2 cCk7DQorCQlzbiA9IGRldnZwLT52X3JkZXYtPnNpX3NuYXBkYXRhOw0KIAkJ VEFJTFFfUkVNT1ZFKCZzbi0+c25faGVhZCwgaXAsIGlfbmV4dHNuYXApOw0K IAkJaXAtPmlfbmV4dHNuYXAudHFlX3ByZXYgPSAwOw0KLQkJbGtwID0gdnAt PnZfdm5sb2NrOw0KKwkJVklfVU5MT0NLKGRldnZwKTsNCisJCWxvY2ttZ3Io JnZwLT52X2xvY2ssIExLX0VYQ0xVU0lWRSwgTlVMTCwgdGQpOw0KKwkJVklf TE9DSyh2cCk7DQorCQlLQVNTRVJUKHZwLT52X3ZubG9jayA9PSAmc24tPnNu X2xvY2ssDQorCQkJKCJmZnNfc25hcHJlbW92ZTogbG9zdCBsb2NrIG11dGF0 aW9uIikpOyANCiAJCXZwLT52X3ZubG9jayA9ICZ2cC0+dl9sb2NrOw0KLQkJ bG9ja21ncihsa3AsIExLX1JFTEVBU0UsIE5VTEwsIHRkKTsNCi0JCWlmIChU QUlMUV9GSVJTVCgmc24tPnNuX2hlYWQpICE9IDApIHsNCi0JCQlWSV9VTkxP Q0soZGV2dnApOw0KLQkJfSBlbHNlIHsNCi0JCQlzbmFwYmxrbGlzdCA9IHNu LT5zbl9ibGtsaXN0Ow0KLQkJCXNuLT5zbl9ibGtsaXN0ID0gMDsNCi0JCQlz bi0+c25fbGlzdHNpemUgPSAwOw0KLQkJCWRldnZwLT52X3JkZXYtPnNpX3Nu YXBkYXRhID0gTlVMTDsNCi0JCQlkZXZ2cC0+dl92ZmxhZyAmPSB+VlZfQ09Q WU9OV1JJVEU7DQotCQkJbG9ja21ncihsa3AsIExLX0RSQUlOfExLX0lOVEVS TE9DSywgVklfTVRYKGRldnZwKSwgdGQpOw0KLQkJCWxvY2ttZ3IobGtwLCBM S19SRUxFQVNFLCBOVUxMLCB0ZCk7DQotCQkJbG9ja2Rlc3Ryb3kobGtwKTsN Ci0JCQlmcmVlKHNuLCBNX1VGU01OVCk7DQotCQkJRlJFRShzbmFwYmxrbGlz dCwgTV9VRlNNTlQpOw0KLQkJfQ0KLQl9DQorCQlWSV9VTkxPQ0sodnApOw0K KwkJVklfTE9DSyhkZXZ2cCk7DQorCQlsb2NrbWdyKCZzbi0+c25fbG9jaywg TEtfUkVMRUFTRSwgTlVMTCwgdGQpOw0KKwkJdHJ5X2ZyZWVfc25hcGRhdGEo ZGV2dnAsIHRkKTsNCisJfSBlbHNlDQorCQlWSV9VTkxPQ0soZGV2dnApOw0K IAkvKg0KIAkgKiBDbGVhciBhbGwgQkxLX05PQ09QWSBmaWVsZHMuIFBhc3Mg YW55IGJsb2NrIGNsYWltcyB0byBvdGhlcg0KIAkgKiBzbmFwc2hvdHMgdGhh dCB3YW50IHRoZW0gKHNlZSBmZnNfc25hcGJsa2ZyZWUgYmVsb3cpLg0KQEAg LTE1NzUsNiArMTU5MSwxMyBAQA0KIAlpcC0+aV9mbGFncyAmPSB+U0ZfU05B UFNIT1Q7DQogCURJUF9TRVQoaXAsIGlfZmxhZ3MsIGlwLT5pX2ZsYWdzKTsN CiAJaXAtPmlfZmxhZyB8PSBJTl9DSEFOR0UgfCBJTl9VUERBVEU7DQorI2lm ZGVmIFFVT1RBDQorCS8qDQorCSAqIFJlZW5hYmxlIGRpc2sgcXVvdGFzIGZv ciBleC1zbmFwc2hvdCBmaWxlLg0KKwkgKi8NCisJaWYgKCFnZXRpbm9xdW90 YShpcCkpDQorCQkodm9pZCkgY2hrZHEoaXAsIERJUChpcCwgaV9ibG9ja3Mp LCBLRVJOQ1JFRCwgRk9SQ0UpOw0KKyNlbmRpZg0KIH0NCiANCiAvKg0KQEAg LTE4NjYsNyArMTg4OSw2IEBADQogCQl9DQogCQlsb2NrbWdyKHZwLT52X3Zu bG9jaywgTEtfSU5URVJMT0NLIHwgTEtfRVhDTFVTSVZFIHwgTEtfUkVUUlks DQogCQkgICAgVklfTVRYKHZwKSwgdGQpOw0KLQkJdHJhbnNmZXJsb2NrZXJz KCZ2cC0+dl9sb2NrLCB2cC0+dl92bmxvY2spOw0KIAkJbG9ja21ncigmdnAt PnZfbG9jaywgTEtfUkVMRUFTRSwgTlVMTCwgdGQpOw0KIAkJLyoNCiAJCSAq IExpbmsgaXQgb250byB0aGUgYWN0aXZlIHNuYXBzaG90IGxpc3QuDQpAQCAt MTkzOSwzMCArMTk2MSwzNSBAQA0KIAlzdHJ1Y3Qgc25hcGRhdGEgKnNuOw0K IAlzdHJ1Y3QgaW5vZGUgKnhwOw0KIAlzdHJ1Y3Qgdm5vZGUgKnZwOw0KKwlz dHJ1Y3QgdGhyZWFkICp0ZCA9IGN1cnRocmVhZDsNCiANCi0Jc24gPSBkZXZ2 cC0+dl9yZGV2LT5zaV9zbmFwZGF0YTsNCiAJVklfTE9DSyhkZXZ2cCk7DQot CXdoaWxlICgoeHAgPSBUQUlMUV9GSVJTVCgmc24tPnNuX2hlYWQpKSAhPSAw KSB7DQorCXNuID0gZGV2dnAtPnZfcmRldi0+c2lfc25hcGRhdGE7DQorCXdo aWxlIChzbiAhPSBOVUxMICYmICh4cCA9IFRBSUxRX0ZJUlNUKCZzbi0+c25f aGVhZCkpICE9IE5VTEwpIHsNCiAJCXZwID0gSVRPVih4cCk7DQotCQl2cC0+ dl92bmxvY2sgPSAmdnAtPnZfbG9jazsNCiAJCVRBSUxRX1JFTU9WRSgmc24t PnNuX2hlYWQsIHhwLCBpX25leHRzbmFwKTsNCiAJCXhwLT5pX25leHRzbmFw LnRxZV9wcmV2ID0gMDsNCi0JCWlmICh4cC0+aV9lZmZubGluayA+IDApIHsN Ci0JCQlWSV9VTkxPQ0soZGV2dnApOw0KKwkJbG9ja21ncigmc24tPnNuX2xv Y2ssIA0KKwkJCUxLX0lOVEVSTE9DSyB8IExLX0VYQ0xVU0lWRSwNCisJCQlW SV9NVFgoZGV2dnApLA0KKwkJCXRkKTsNCisJCVZJX0xPQ0sodnApOw0KKwkJ bG9ja21ncigmdnAtPnZfbG9jaywNCisJCQlMS19JTlRFUkxPQ0sgfCBMS19F WENMVVNJVkUsDQorCQkJVklfTVRYKHZwKSwgdGQpOw0KKwkJVklfTE9DSyh2 cCk7DQorCQlLQVNTRVJUKHZwLT52X3ZubG9jayA9PSAmc24tPnNuX2xvY2ss DQorCQkoImZmc19zbmFwc2hvdF91bm1vdW50OiBsb3N0IGxvY2sgbXV0YXRp b24iKSk7IA0KKwkJdnAtPnZfdm5sb2NrID0gJnZwLT52X2xvY2s7DQorCQlW SV9VTkxPQ0sodnApOw0KKwkJbG9ja21ncigmdnAtPnZfbG9jaywgTEtfUkVM RUFTRSwgTlVMTCwgdGQpOw0KKwkJbG9ja21ncigmc24tPnNuX2xvY2ssIExL X1JFTEVBU0UsIE5VTEwsIHRkKTsNCisJCWlmICh4cC0+aV9lZmZubGluayA+ IDApDQogCQkJdnJlbGUodnApOw0KLQkJCVZJX0xPQ0soZGV2dnApOw0KLQkJ fQ0KLQl9DQotCWRldnZwLT52X3JkZXYtPnNpX3NuYXBkYXRhID0gTlVMTDsN Ci0JZGV2dnAtPnZfdmZsYWcgJj0gflZWX0NPUFlPTldSSVRFOw0KLQlWSV9V TkxPQ0soZGV2dnApOw0KLQlpZiAoc24tPnNuX2Jsa2xpc3QgIT0gTlVMTCkg ew0KLQkJRlJFRShzbi0+c25fYmxrbGlzdCwgTV9VRlNNTlQpOw0KLQkJc24t PnNuX2Jsa2xpc3QgPSBOVUxMOw0KLQkJc24tPnNuX2xpc3RzaXplID0gMDsN CisJCVZJX0xPQ0soZGV2dnApOw0KKwkJc24gPSBkZXZ2cC0+dl9yZGV2LT5z aV9zbmFwZGF0YTsNCiAJfQ0KLQlsb2NrZGVzdHJveSgmc24tPnNuX2xvY2sp Ow0KLQlmcmVlKHNuLCBNX1VGU01OVCk7DQorCXRyeV9mcmVlX3NuYXBkYXRh KGRldnZwLCB0ZCk7DQogCUFTU0VSVF9WT1BfTE9DS0VEKGRldnZwLCAiZmZz X3NuYXBzaG90X3VubW91bnQiKTsNCiB9DQogDQpAQCAtMTk4NCw2ICsyMDEx LDcgQEANCiAJdWZzMl9kYWRkcl90IGxibiwgYmxrbm8sICpzbmFwYmxrbGlz dDsNCiAJaW50IGxvd2VyLCB1cHBlciwgbWlkLCBpbmRpcm9mZiwgZXJyb3Ig PSAwOw0KIAlpbnQgbGF1bmNoZWRfYXN5bmNfaW8sIHByZXZfbm9ydW5uaW5n YnVmOw0KKwlsb25nIHNhdmVkX3J1bm5pbmdidWZzcGFjZTsNCiANCiAJaWYg KChWVE9JKGJwLT5iX3ZwKS0+aV9mbGFncyAmIFNGX1NOQVBTSE9UKSAhPSAw KQ0KIAkJcmV0dXJuICgwKTsJCS8qIFVwZGF0ZSBvbiBhIHNuYXBzaG90IGZp bGUgKi8NCkBAIC0yMDI2LDcgKzIwNTQsOSBAQA0KIAkgKiBmb3IgYSBsb25n IHRpbWUgd2FpdGluZyBvbiBzbmFwbGssIGJhY2sgaXQgb3V0IG9mDQogCSAq IHJ1bm5pbmdidWZzcGFjZSwgcG9zc2libHkgd2FraW5nIG90aGVyIHRocmVh ZHMgd2FpdGluZyBmb3Igc3BhY2UuDQogCSAqLw0KLQlydW5uaW5nYnVmd2Fr ZXVwKGJwKTsNCisJc2F2ZWRfcnVubmluZ2J1ZnNwYWNlID0gYnAtPmJfcnVu bmluZ2J1ZnNwYWNlOw0KKwlpZiAoc2F2ZWRfcnVubmluZ2J1ZnNwYWNlICE9 IDApDQorCQlydW5uaW5nYnVmd2FrZXVwKGJwKTsNCiAJLyoNCiAJICogTm90 IGluIHRoZSBwcmVjb21wdXRlZCBsaXN0LCBzbyBjaGVjayB0aGUgc25hcHNo b3RzLg0KIAkgKi8NCkBAIC0yMDM4LDkgKzIwNjgsMTEgQEANCiAJCWlmIChz biA9PSBOVUxMIHx8DQogCQkgICAgVEFJTFFfRklSU1QoJnNuLT5zbl9oZWFk KSA9PSBOVUxMKSB7DQogCQkJVklfVU5MT0NLKGRldnZwKTsNCi0JCQlpZiAo YnAtPmJfcnVubmluZ2J1ZnNwYWNlKQ0KKwkJCWlmIChzYXZlZF9ydW5uaW5n YnVmc3BhY2UgIT0gMCkgew0KKwkJCQlicC0+Yl9ydW5uaW5nYnVmc3BhY2Ug PSBzYXZlZF9ydW5uaW5nYnVmc3BhY2U7DQogCQkJCWF0b21pY19hZGRfaW50 KCZydW5uaW5nYnVmc3BhY2UsDQogCQkJCQkgICAgICAgYnAtPmJfcnVubmlu Z2J1ZnNwYWNlKTsNCisJCQl9DQogCQkJcmV0dXJuICgwKTsJCS8qIFNuYXBz aG90IGdvbmUgKi8NCiAJCX0NCiAJfQ0KQEAgLTIxNjEsOCArMjE5MywxMCBA QA0KIAkvKg0KIAkgKiBJL08gb24gYnAgd2lsbCBub3cgYmUgc3RhcnRlZCwg c28gY291bnQgaXQgaW4gcnVubmluZ2J1ZnNwYWNlLg0KIAkgKi8NCi0JaWYg KGJwLT5iX3J1bm5pbmdidWZzcGFjZSkNCisJaWYgKHNhdmVkX3J1bm5pbmdi dWZzcGFjZSAhPSAwKSB7DQorCQlicC0+Yl9ydW5uaW5nYnVmc3BhY2UgPSBz YXZlZF9ydW5uaW5nYnVmc3BhY2U7DQogCQlhdG9taWNfYWRkX2ludCgmcnVu bmluZ2J1ZnNwYWNlLCBicC0+Yl9ydW5uaW5nYnVmc3BhY2UpOw0KKwl9DQog CXJldHVybiAoZXJyb3IpOw0KIH0NCiANCkBAIC0yMTg0LDEzICsyMjE4LDEw IEBADQogCWJpcC0+YmlvX29mZnNldCA9IGRidG9iKGZzYnRvZGIoaXAtPmlf ZnMsIGJsa3N0b2ZyYWdzKGlwLT5pX2ZzLCBsYm4pKSk7DQogCWJpcC0+Ymlv X2RhdGEgPSBicC0+Yl9kYXRhOw0KIAliaXAtPmJpb19sZW5ndGggPSBicC0+ Yl9iY291bnQ7DQorCWJpcC0+YmlvX2RvbmUgPSBOVUxMOw0KIA0KIAlnX2lv X3JlcXVlc3QoYmlwLCBpcC0+aV9kZXZ2cC0+dl9idWZvYmouYm9fcHJpdmF0 ZSk7DQotDQotCWRvIA0KLQkJbXNsZWVwKGJpcCwgTlVMTCwgUFJJQklPLCAi c25hcHJkYiIsIGh6LzEwKTsNCi0Jd2hpbGUgKCEoYmlwLT5iaW9fZmxhZ3Mg JiBCSU9fRE9ORSkpOw0KLQlicC0+Yl9lcnJvciA9IGJpcC0+YmlvX2Vycm9y Ow0KKwlicC0+Yl9lcnJvciA9IGJpb3dhaXQoYmlwLCAic25hcHJkYiIpOw0K IAlnX2Rlc3Ryb3lfYmlvKGJpcCk7DQogCXJldHVybiAoYnAtPmJfZXJyb3Ip Ow0KIH0NCkBAIC0yMjU5LDMgKzIyOTAsMzIgQEANCiAJTU5UX0lVTkxPQ0so bXApOw0KIAl2bl9maW5pc2hlZF9zZWNvbmRhcnlfd3JpdGUobXApOw0KIH0N CisNCisvKiBUcnkgdG8gZnJlZSBzbmFwZGF0YSBhc3NvY2lhdGVkIHdpdGgg ZGV2dnAgKi8NCitzdGF0aWMgdm9pZA0KK3RyeV9mcmVlX3NuYXBkYXRhKHN0 cnVjdCB2bm9kZSAqZGV2dnAsDQorCQkgIHN0cnVjdCB0aHJlYWQgKnRkKQ0K K3sNCisJc3RydWN0IHNuYXBkYXRhICpzbjsNCisJdWZzMl9kYWRkcl90ICpz bmFwYmxrbGlzdDsNCisNCisJc24gPSBkZXZ2cC0+dl9yZGV2LT5zaV9zbmFw ZGF0YTsNCisNCisJaWYgKHNuID09IE5VTEwgfHwgVEFJTFFfRklSU1QoJnNu LT5zbl9oZWFkKSAhPSBOVUxMIHx8DQorCSAgICAoZGV2dnAtPnZfdmZsYWcg JiBWVl9DT1BZT05XUklURSkgPT0gMCkgew0KKwkJVklfVU5MT0NLKGRldnZw KTsNCisJCXJldHVybjsNCisJfQ0KKw0KKwlkZXZ2cC0+dl9yZGV2LT5zaV9z bmFwZGF0YSA9IE5VTEw7DQorCWRldnZwLT52X3ZmbGFnICY9IH5WVl9DT1BZ T05XUklURTsNCisJc25hcGJsa2xpc3QgPSBzbi0+c25fYmxrbGlzdDsNCisJ c24tPnNuX2Jsa2xpc3QgPSBOVUxMOw0KKwlzbi0+c25fbGlzdHNpemUgPSAw Ow0KKwlsb2NrbWdyKCZzbi0+c25fbG9jaywgTEtfRFJBSU58TEtfSU5URVJM T0NLLCBWSV9NVFgoZGV2dnApLCB0ZCk7DQorCWxvY2ttZ3IoJnNuLT5zbl9s b2NrLCBMS19SRUxFQVNFLCBOVUxMLCB0ZCk7DQorCWxvY2tkZXN0cm95KCZz bi0+c25fbG9jayk7DQorCWZyZWUoc24sIE1fVUZTTU5UKTsNCisJaWYgKHNu YXBibGtsaXN0ICE9IE5VTEwpDQorCQlGUkVFKHNuYXBibGtsaXN0LCBNX1VG U01OVCk7DQorfQ0KSW5kZXg6IHVmcy9mZnMvZmZzX3Zmc29wcy5jDQo9PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQpSQ1MgZmlsZTogL2hvbWUvbmN2cy9zcmMv c3lzL3Vmcy9mZnMvZmZzX3Zmc29wcy5jLHYNCnJldHJpZXZpbmcgcmV2aXNp b24gMS4yOTAuMi45DQpkaWZmIC11IC1yMS4yOTAuMi45IGZmc192ZnNvcHMu Yw0KLS0tIHVmcy9mZnMvZmZzX3Zmc29wcy5jCTIyIE1hciAyMDA2IDE3OjU0 OjUwIC0wMDAwCTEuMjkwLjIuOQ0KKysrIHVmcy9mZnMvZmZzX3Zmc29wcy5j CTcgTWF5IDIwMDYgMTY6Mjc6NTYgLTAwMDANCkBAIC0xNzI4LDYgKzE3Mjgs NyBAQA0KIAkJaWYgKCh2cC0+dl92ZmxhZyAmIFZWX0NPUFlPTldSSVRFKSAm Jg0KIAkJICAgIHZwLT52X3JkZXYtPnNpX3NuYXBkYXRhICE9IE5VTEwpIHsN CiAJCQlpZiAoKGJwLT5iX2ZsYWdzICYgQl9DTFVTVEVSKSAhPSAwKSB7DQor CQkJCXJ1bm5pbmdidWZ3YWtldXAoYnApOw0KIAkJCQlUQUlMUV9GT1JFQUNI KHRicCwgJmJwLT5iX2NsdXN0ZXIuY2x1c3Rlcl9oZWFkLA0KIAkJCQkJICAg ICAgYl9jbHVzdGVyLmNsdXN0ZXJfZW50cnkpIHsNCiAJCQkJCWVycm9yID0g ZmZzX2NvcHlvbndyaXRlKHZwLCB0YnApOw0KQEAgLTE3MzksNiArMTc0MCw5 IEBADQogCQkJCQkJcmV0dXJuOw0KIAkJCQkJfQ0KIAkJCQl9DQorCQkJCWJw LT5iX3J1bm5pbmdidWZzcGFjZSA9IGJwLT5iX2J1ZnNpemU7DQorCQkJCWF0 b21pY19hZGRfaW50KCZydW5uaW5nYnVmc3BhY2UsDQorCQkJCQkgICAgICAg YnAtPmJfcnVubmluZ2J1ZnNwYWNlKTsNCiAJCQl9IGVsc2Ugew0KIAkJCQll cnJvciA9IGZmc19jb3B5b253cml0ZSh2cCwgYnApOw0KIAkJCQlpZiAoZXJy b3IgIT0gMCAmJiBlcnJvciAhPSBFT1BOT1RTVVBQKSB7DQpJbmRleDogdWZz L2Zmcy9mZnNfdm5vcHMuYw0KPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KUkNT IGZpbGU6IC9ob21lL25jdnMvc3JjL3N5cy91ZnMvZmZzL2Zmc192bm9wcy5j LHYNCnJldHJpZXZpbmcgcmV2aXNpb24gMS4xNTcuMi4xDQpkaWZmIC11IC1y MS4xNTcuMi4xIGZmc192bm9wcy5jDQotLS0gdWZzL2Zmcy9mZnNfdm5vcHMu YwkyOSBPY3QgMjAwNSAwNjo0Mzo1NSAtMDAwMAkxLjE1Ny4yLjENCisrKyB1 ZnMvZmZzL2Zmc192bm9wcy5jCTcgTWF5IDIwMDYgMTY6Mjc6NTYgLTAwMDAN CkBAIC0zMzgsNyArMzM4LDU0IEBADQogCQlzdHJ1Y3QgdGhyZWFkICphX3Rk Ow0KIAl9ICovICphcDsNCiB7DQorI2lmbmRlZiBOT19GRlNfU05BUFNIT1QN CisJc3RydWN0IHZub2RlICp2cDsNCisJaW50IGZsYWdzOw0KKwlzdHJ1Y3Qg bG9jayAqbGtwOw0KKwlpbnQgcmVzdWx0Ow0KKwkNCisJc3dpdGNoIChhcC0+ YV9mbGFncyAmIExLX1RZUEVfTUFTSykgew0KKwljYXNlIExLX1NIQVJFRDoN CisJY2FzZSBMS19VUEdSQURFOg0KKwljYXNlIExLX0VYQ0xVU0lWRToNCisJ CXZwID0gYXAtPmFfdnA7DQorCQlmbGFncyA9IGFwLT5hX2ZsYWdzOw0KKwkJ Zm9yICg7Oykgew0KKwkJCS8qDQorCQkJICogdm5vZGUgaW50ZXJsb2NrIG11 c3QgYmUgaGVsZCB0byBlbnN1cmUgdGhhdA0KKwkJCSAqIHRoZSBwb3NzaWJs eSBleHRlcm5hbCBsb2NrIGlzbid0IGZyZWVkLA0KKwkJCSAqIGUuZy4gd2hl biBtdXRhdGluZyBmcm9tIHNuYXBzaG90IGZpbGUgdm5vZGUNCisJCQkgKiB0 byByZWd1bGFyIGZpbGUgdm5vZGUuDQorCQkJICovDQorCQkJaWYgKChmbGFn cyAmIExLX0lOVEVSTE9DSykgPT0gMCkgew0KKwkJCQlWSV9MT0NLKHZwKTsN CisJCQkJZmxhZ3MgfD0gTEtfSU5URVJMT0NLOw0KKwkJCX0NCisJCQlsa3Ag PSB2cC0+dl92bmxvY2s7DQorCQkJcmVzdWx0ID0gbG9ja21ncihsa3AsIGZs YWdzLCBWSV9NVFgodnApLCBhcC0+YV90ZCk7DQorCQkJaWYgKGxrcCA9PSB2 cC0+dl92bmxvY2sgfHwgcmVzdWx0ICE9IDApDQorCQkJCWJyZWFrOw0KKwkJ CS8qDQorCQkJICogQXBwYXJlbnQgc3VjY2VzcywgZXhjZXB0IHRoYXQgdGhl IHZub2RlDQorCQkJICogbXV0YXRlZCBiZXR3ZWVuIHNuYXBzaG90IGZpbGUg dm5vZGUgYW5kDQorCQkJICogcmVndWxhciBmaWxlIHZub2RlIHdoaWxlIHRo aXMgcHJvY2Vzcw0KKwkJCSAqIHNsZXB0LiAgVGhlIGxvY2sgY3VycmVudGx5 IGhlbGQgaXMgbm90IHRoZQ0KKwkJCSAqIHJpZ2h0IGxvY2suICBSZWxlYXNl IGl0LCBhbmQgdHJ5IHRvIGdldCB0aGUNCisJCQkgKiBuZXcgbG9jay4NCisJ CQkgKi8NCisJCQkodm9pZCkgbG9ja21ncihsa3AsIExLX1JFTEVBU0UsIFZJ X01UWCh2cCksIGFwLT5hX3RkKTsNCisJCQlpZiAoKGZsYWdzICYgTEtfVFlQ RV9NQVNLKSA9PSBMS19VUEdSQURFKQ0KKwkJCQlmbGFncyA9IChmbGFncyAm IH5MS19UWVBFX01BU0spIHwgTEtfRVhDTFVTSVZFOw0KKwkJCWZsYWdzICY9 IH5MS19JTlRFUkxPQ0s7DQorCQl9DQorCQlicmVhazsNCisJZGVmYXVsdDoN CisJCXJlc3VsdCA9IFZPUF9MT0NLX0FQVigmdWZzX3Zub2Rlb3BzLCBhcCk7 DQorCX0NCisJcmV0dXJuIChyZXN1bHQpOw0KKyNlbHNlDQogCXJldHVybiAo Vk9QX0xPQ0tfQVBWKCZ1ZnNfdm5vZGVvcHMsIGFwKSk7DQorI2VuZGlmDQog fQ0KIA0KIC8qDQpJbmRleDogdWZzL3Vmcy91ZnNfcXVvdGEuYw0KPT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KUkNTIGZpbGU6IC9ob21lL25jdnMvc3JjL3N5 cy91ZnMvdWZzL3Vmc19xdW90YS5jLHYNCnJldHJpZXZpbmcgcmV2aXNpb24g MS43NC4yLjIuMi4xDQpkaWZmIC11IC1yMS43NC4yLjIuMi4xIHVmc19xdW90 YS5jDQotLS0gdWZzL3Vmcy91ZnNfcXVvdGEuYwkyNiBBcHIgMjAwNiAwMToy Mzo1OSAtMDAwMAkxLjc0LjIuMi4yLjENCisrKyB1ZnMvdWZzL3Vmc19xdW90 YS5jCTcgTWF5IDIwMDYgMTY6Mjc6NTYgLTAwMDANCkBAIC0zNSw2ICszNSw4 IEBADQogI2luY2x1ZGUgPHN5cy9jZGVmcy5oPg0KIF9fRkJTRElEKCIkRnJl ZUJTRCQiKTsNCiANCisjaW5jbHVkZSAib3B0X2Zmcy5oIg0KKw0KICNpbmNs dWRlIDxzeXMvcGFyYW0uaD4NCiAjaW5jbHVkZSA8c3lzL3N5c3RtLmg+DQog I2luY2x1ZGUgPHN5cy9mY250bC5oPg0KQEAgLTQ2LDYgKzQ4LDcgQEANCiAj aW5jbHVkZSA8c3lzL25hbWVpLmg+DQogI2luY2x1ZGUgPHN5cy9wcm9jLmg+ DQogI2luY2x1ZGUgPHN5cy9zb2NrZXQuaD4NCisjaW5jbHVkZSA8c3lzL3N0 YXQuaD4NCiAjaW5jbHVkZSA8c3lzL3N5c2N0bC5oPg0KICNpbmNsdWRlIDxz eXMvdm5vZGUuaD4NCiANCkBAIC05Nyw2ICsxMDAsMTMgQEANCiAJc3RydWN0 IHZub2RlICp2cCA9IElUT1YoaXApOw0KIAlpbnQgZXJyb3I7DQogDQorI2lm bmRlZiBOT19GRlNfU05BUFNIT1QNCisJLyoNCisJICogRGlzayBxdW90YXMg bXVzdCBiZSB0dXJuZWQgb2ZmIGZvciBzbmFwc2hvdCBmaWxlcy4NCisJICov DQorCWlmICgoaXAtPmlfZmxhZ3MgJiBTRl9TTkFQU0hPVCkgIT0gMCkNCisJ CXJldHVybiAoMCk7DQorI2VuZGlmDQogCXVtcCA9IFZGU1RPVUZTKHZwLT52 X21vdW50KTsNCiAJLyoNCiAJICogU2V0IHVwIHRoZSB1c2VyIHF1b3RhIGJh c2VkIG9uIGZpbGUgdWlkLg0KQEAgLTM3NSw2ICszODUsMTMgQEANCiAJc3Ry dWN0IHVmc21vdW50ICp1bXAgPSBWRlNUT1VGUyhJVE9WKGlwKS0+dl9tb3Vu dCk7DQogCWludCBpOw0KIA0KKyNpZm5kZWYgTk9fRkZTX1NOQVBTSE9UDQor CS8qDQorCSAqIERpc2sgcXVvdGFzIG11c3QgYmUgdHVybmVkIG9mZiBmb3Ig c25hcHNob3QgZmlsZXMuDQorCSAqLw0KKwlpZiAoKGlwLT5pX2ZsYWdzICYg U0ZfU05BUFNIT1QpICE9IDApDQorCQlyZXR1cm47DQorI2VuZGlmDQogCWZv ciAoaSA9IDA7IGkgPCBNQVhRVU9UQVM7IGkrKykgew0KIAkJaWYgKHVtcC0+ dW1fcXVvdGFzW2ldID09IE5VTExWUCB8fA0KIAkJICAgICh1bXAtPnVtX3Fm bGFnc1tpXSAmIChRVEZfT1BFTklOR3xRVEZfQ0xPU0lORykpKQ0K --0-1037833276-1147019348=:19670-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:38:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1B716A41B for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from fw.zoral.com.ua (ll-227.216.82.212.sovam.net.ua [212.82.216.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA1743D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:38:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k47Gcimt052418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 May 2006 19:38:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47GciIF081024; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:38:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k47GchtT081023; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:38:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:38:43 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Dmitry Morozovsky Message-ID: <20060507163843.GC12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2> <3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060506233525.GA52731@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060507104355.K92932@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507175330.H19670@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507154029.GA12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060507195831.A19670@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507160820.GB12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060507202808.P19670@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s9fJI615cBHmzTOP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060507202808.P19670@woozle.rinet.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.1, clamav-milter version 0.88.1 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on fw.zoral.com.ua Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:38:52 -0000 --s9fJI615cBHmzTOP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:29:08PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >=20 > KB> > I'm running RELENG_6 with hand-merged sys/ufs/ffs changes from 1 to= 7 May. >=20 > KB> It would be great to show the patchset. Also note that relevant chang= es are > KB> not limited to ufs/ffs. For instance, rev. 1.671 of kern/vfs_subr.c is > KB> also important, as well as rev. 1.82 of ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c, that > KB> deals explicitely with combination of snapshots and quotas. >=20 > Actually I did (see attachment) ;-) Please, add rev. 1.292 of kern/kern_exec.c. It is on hot path. --s9fJI615cBHmzTOP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXiKSC3+MBN1Mb4gRAt4NAKC+8yULsxXdX2RN1EzhBw/8ZV+NWgCgsuOA JhYYLFLjQkoJgS1qBNE/ckc= =VMDg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s9fJI615cBHmzTOP-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 16:44:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031A016A403 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E769543D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:44:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47GiJW2025727; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:44:19 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:44:19 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Konstantin Belousov In-Reply-To: <20060507163843.GC12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Message-ID: <20060507204149.H19670@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2> <3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060506233525.GA52731@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060507104355.K92932@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507175330.H19670@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507154029.GA12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060507195831.A19670@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507160820.GB12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060507202808.P19670@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060507163843.GC12655@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 07 May 2006 20:44:19 +0400 (MSD) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:44:22 -0000 On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote: KB> > KB> > I'm running RELENG_6 with hand-merged sys/ufs/ffs changes from 1 to 7 May. KB> > KB> > KB> It would be great to show the patchset. Also note that relevant changes are KB> > KB> not limited to ufs/ffs. For instance, rev. 1.671 of kern/vfs_subr.c is KB> > KB> also important, as well as rev. 1.82 of ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c, that KB> > KB> deals explicitely with combination of snapshots and quotas. KB> > KB> > Actually I did (see attachment) ;-) KB> Please, add rev. 1.292 of kern/kern_exec.c. It is on hot path. I thought about this revision, but did not sure. Added, thanks. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 19:16:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4004716A466 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BC643D7F for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:16:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1212546pya for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 12:16:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hA3JU5nEpPJdWAxe2UW3xDs/Bn0m2Tdo0i+Hqlo+AxjWb3x6kenTUR6ptWjJDnL6oasWvsW7lYI3NaEChxtPJI45QfG9rTFVujVWKfBs/RhvW+yiH4YqJXLTexxAyg5OrzFNbHqDw9uhFgFUpDrHTNHt+XjWJeooBdC0h+k6y88= Received: by 10.35.54.20 with SMTP id g20mr1868422pyk; Sun, 07 May 2006 12:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.29.20 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0605071216m5fa3b38fu7c1afde22dd5e2e0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:16:42 +0100 From: Chris To: "Scott Long" In-Reply-To: <445D55D9.5070701@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <20060505192152.GA17616@soaustin.net> <3aaaa3a0605061326n2f18e38epf6b93f2042385cec@mail.gmail.com> <445D55D9.5070701@samsco.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org, linimon@freebsd.org, Mike Jakubik , kris@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:16:46 -0000 On 07/05/06, Scott Long wrote: > Chris wrote: > > > On 05/05/06, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > >> Make Jakubik wrote: > >> > >> > FreeBSD users now demand stability and performance, as opposed to an > >> > influx of new bells and whistles just before the release [...] I ful= ly > >> > understand that this is a volunteer project [...] > >> > >> I'm sorry, but the former statement proves the latter false. > >> > >> Let's try to do our Semi-Annual Refresher Course On Open Source > >> Development: > >> > >> The developers (at least 99% of them) work for free. In their own spa= re > >> time. Their motivations vary but I don't believe any of those include > >> being in a position to feel they need to respond to demands. That's n= ot > >> a positive motivator. If they wanted to be in that position, they cou= ld > >> just stay at their $realjobs for those extra hours. > >> > >> Part of their shared goals, however, is to turn out the best system th= at > >> they possibly can, in the hopes that people will find it useful and wa= nt > >> to contribute back to it. However, there are no guarantees involved, > >> implicit or explicit. (If you want to compare and contrast to how muc= h > >> "guarantee" you get from closed-source development, please pull out a > >> copy > >> of your EULA. They barely even "guarantee" that there are bits on the > >> CD.) > >> > >> There's a long process where the developers try to agree on what featu= res > >> need to be included and what bugs need to be fixed. From the standpoi= nt > >> of the people who attempt to coordinate this process, in technical jar= gon > >> the process is know as "herding cats". I would be able to serve as an > >> expert witness in court about this. (Side note: some of the cats hiss= , > >> bite, and scratch; very few, if any, have _any_ interest in being > >> herder.) > >> > >> There are always tradeoffs between stability and features. During the > >> 5.X cycle we managed in some degree to de-optimize both: we had featur= es > >> that were only available in an "experimental" branch that some people > >> considered critical (wireless, anyone?) while that "experimental" bran= ch > >> was unsuitable for production use. The idea was that we would hold on > >> to declaring 5.X "STABLE" until all the major bugs were fixed. > >> > >> And as a consequence, we didn't release for -- what, 2 years? > >> > >> So we've thrown out the idea of "wait until every possible bug is fixe= d." > >> It leads to rare releases, and larger code chaos, larger instability, = and > >> allows FreeBSD's detractors to sniff "well, they're never going to > >> release > >> anything again." (Notice how the "BSD is dying" crowd on Slashdot has > >> been a lot quieter since we released 6.0?) > >> > >> So now what we're doing is trying to come up with more regular (not on > >> absolute deadline) releases, with smaller feature sets, to enable smal= ler > >> sets of new code to be debugged simultaneously. > >> > >> The features that some users see as critical, others don't. (I don't > >> have > >> quotas enabled; I have disabled soft-updates on the theory that as a > >> single > >> user I can trade longer startup time for possibly greater error > >> recovery). > >> > >> > I wish i was a good Unix C programmer myself, so i could contribute > >> in a > >> > more direct way > >> > >> And there's the rub. The people who _are_ good Unix/C programmers are > >> the > >> ones doing the work, and as such, feel that they have the final say ab= out > >> what goes and what doesn't. While I hope that each of them will > >> listen to > >> what individual users are saying, and take good suggestions to heart, = the > >> fact remains that they are under no _obligation_ to do so. > >> > >> Finally, as has been pointed out already, the interactions between > >> quotas, soft-updates, and the rest of the system have problems that ar= e > >> probably going to be fairly difficult to isolate and test. Thus, they > >> could take days, weeks, or months. If we were to hold the release unt= il > >> these were fixed, basically our last 2 months of QA would be out the > >> window. This is not a way to keep developers happy; at some point the= y > >> will tire of the inability to work on the things that they find > >> interesting, > >> and wander off to find something else more fun to do. > >> > >> Summary: it's too bad that there are regressions, but sometime they're > >> a fact of life. If these regressions are in areas that are critical f= or > >> a certain user, that user should just skip 6.1 and wait for 6.2. The > >> stability gains that 6.1 have over 6.0 in so many other areas means th= at > >> it's time for 6.1 to go out the door, because for the majority of user= s > >> it's going to be a big win. > >> > >> As always, we welcome test cases on e.g. non-critical systems, earlier > >> in the release process (or between releases), where there's enough tim= e > >> to thoroughly test that any proposed fix doesn't cause more problems t= han > >> it cures. Within a few days of release, that simply isn't the case ri= ght > >> now. > >> > >> mcl > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > > > nice post and ultimately you are correct, I personally would prefere a > > higher gap between releases for the following reasons tho. > > > > 1 - it does increase stability if the extra time is spent fixing bugs > > and testing the fixes. > > > > No, actually it doesn't. The real push to get bugs fixed doesn't happen > until about 2 weeks into the start of the release cycle. It doesn't > matter if it's been 2 months or 2 years since the last release; letting > it sit longer absolutely does NOT result in fewer bugs. in fact, it > results in MORE bugs, because more happens in the longer gap that needs > to be fixed. > > > 2 - its easier for administration, upgrading freebsd every 2 to 3 > > months isnt ideal for administrators. I know releases are supported > > for much longer but given what kris told me recently that ports are > > only supported on the very latest release I found that a bit worrying. > > There is nothing forcing users to upgrade at every release. For my > company's product, I just updated us to 6.1, and I don't expect to do > a full update again until 6.3 or 6.4, other than some small targetted > micro-updates as needed. For my production mail and firewall servers, > they are running RELENG_6_0, and I probably won't upgrade them until > 6.2 or 6.3. > > > > > 3 - it raises profile for the release, the euphoria surrounding a > > release is much less if there is one every other month. > > It was never, ever suggested that there be one release per month. It > was planned that there be a release every 18 weeks. There are snapshot > builds every month, and that is done to make sure that the releases > scripts continue to work, and give the adventurous users something to > play with. > > > > > In terms of a new major version ie. 7.x over 6.x I think that should > > only be released when their is something major changed like 5.x over > > 4.x had a new filesystem smp support etc. and I happen to think > > because 5.1 and 5.2 werent STABLE the 5.3 STABLE release turned out > > very stable at least in my experience and was more stable then 6.0. > > 5.1 and 5.2 were not given the 'STABLE' nomenclature. As for 5.3 being > "more stable than 6.0", that is a very subjective statement. I can > give you a list of at least 500 things that were fixed in between 5.3 > and 6.0. Unfortunately, a few things regressed, as often happens. > > > What > > was major difference between 6.0 and 5.4? if I understand it > > correctly their has been a lot of work done fixing problems that > > existed in 5.x but no new feature to shout about. ULE which was > > unfinished in 5.x still remains unfinished in 6.x and I wonder if will > > be a unfinished feature in 7.x. > > You obviously never read the release notes, sorry. MPSAFE VFS was a BIG > feature for 6.0. Given that your discussion seems to be headed away > from researched facts, I'll just stop here. I won't even recognize your > statement about adding Java to the base system. > > Scott > > Wow I generated some responses. my comments I think were too strong and harsh but I will respond. GNATS didnt reply so I will send the info about email address I used and see if I can find the pr number as well. One issue was a dicussion on here which already had a PR so I didnt post a seperate PR for it that was the bge issue. I dont have servers with massive uptimes at the cost of security, if something has a patch that will pose a risk to me I will schedule the necessary maintenance on that server I dont immediatly apply it tho since I cant be rebooting servers every week. I was reffering more to making sure everything carries on running on the server after the upgrade. But you are right in that I dont upgrade every version anyway, I will have to on my 5.4 server's to 5.5 since 5.4 is EOL end of may. I will put all my 6.0 to 6.1 for stability reasons and hopefully after then I can wait till 6.3 like you said. The java I picked up from a newsletter about the licensing changes, obviously I misread it if my information is incorrect I apologise for that. Chris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 20:09:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E7616A401 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A77643D46 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:09:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: (qmail 99499 invoked from network); 7 May 2006 20:09:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noackjr@supercrime.org@24.99.22.177 with login) by smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 May 2006 20:09:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB171632E; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:09:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at noacks.org Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6VYaKAbwFDq3; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:09:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B153461A8; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:09:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k47K9GPM000502; Sun, 7 May 2006 16:09:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <445E53E7.3020505@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:09:11 -0400 From: Jonathan Noack User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20060507023942.B36981@ganymede.hub.org> <445DA04F.4010808@greenmeadow.ca> <20060507052550.J36981@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060507052550.J36981@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=991D8195; url=http://www.noacks.org/cert/noackjr.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF96C3F869229D63FA9928E0F" Cc: Duane Whitty , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0: ethernet freezes sporatically ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 20:09:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF96C3F869229D63FA9928E0F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/07/06 04:27, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Duane Whitty wrote: >> Have you considered it might be an Azureas issue? >=20 > That I have, but nice to hear from someone that has experienced similar= > ... the problems did start *around* the same time ... maybe taking up t= o > many "slots" due to the connections ... >=20 > Hrmmm ... might try lowering the number of peers possible and see if > that helps ... You mentioned this box is acting as a router. Do you have any firewall rules in place that could be responsible? The suggestion of a tcpdump at both ends is a good one. -Jonathan --=20 Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 --------------enigF96C3F869229D63FA9928E0F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXlPsUFz01pkdgZURAoMOAJ9WL5cg7Iw6D/gRshPRFSBDwS2k5gCfeEOw I5dWaKSWocfwLUOcJrRgS0U= =Z/cD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF96C3F869229D63FA9928E0F-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 20:52:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CDF16A458 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:52:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483F943D5E for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 20:52:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1183F290C39; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:52:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37438-01; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:52:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822A1290C38; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:52:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 24A6A45CB0; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:52:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C233E7B2; Sun, 7 May 2006 17:52:23 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:52:23 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Jonathan Noack In-Reply-To: <445E53E7.3020505@alumni.rice.edu> Message-ID: <20060507175211.Y36981@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060507023942.B36981@ganymede.hub.org> <445DA04F.4010808@greenmeadow.ca> <20060507052550.J36981@ganymede.hub.org> <445E53E7.3020505@alumni.rice.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Duane Whitty , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0: ethernet freezes sporatically ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 20:52:25 -0000 On Sun, 7 May 2006, Jonathan Noack wrote: > On 05/07/06 04:27, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> On Sun, 7 May 2006, Duane Whitty wrote: >>> Have you considered it might be an Azureas issue? >> >> That I have, but nice to hear from someone that has experienced similar >> ... the problems did start *around* the same time ... maybe taking up to >> many "slots" due to the connections ... >> >> Hrmmm ... might try lowering the number of peers possible and see if >> that helps ... > > You mentioned this box is acting as a router. Do you have any firewall > rules in place that could be responsible? Not at this time, no ... straight NAT ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 23:48:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72D516A403 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 400E443D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:48:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 8973 invoked by uid 399); 7 May 2006 23:48:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 May 2006 23:48:46 -0000 Message-ID: <445E875C.8010602@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:48:44 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Iantcho Vassilev References: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 23:48:47 -0000 Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > Hello to all, > > > I noticed such a problem: > > I have a 6.1 RC2 Step one should be to upgrade to the latest 6-stable, and run mergemaster. > and i have in rc.conf > > pf_enable="YES" > pflogd_enable="YES" I think you already corrected yourself to say that you have pflog_enable, not pflogd_, correct? > but when the system boots i test with: > > pfctl -vs rules > > and there are not rules loaded.if i load them by hand there is no problem.. When you say "load them by hand," what do you do exactly? > then i made: > > rc_debug="YES" Try adding rc_info=yes as well. > and the first thing that i saw was: when pf_enable is after pflogd_enable ; > it is not printed(checked).. The order of the variables in your rc.conf file is not relevant. > i put pf_load="YES" >> /boot/loader.conf > and still the ruleset is NOT loaded on boot... The rc system doesn't know anything about /boot/loader.conf. I'm also interested in what happens if you add -v to the pf_flags. What are the permissions on /etc/pf.conf? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 23:59:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DCA16A409 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E4AE43D45 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 23:59:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 15343 invoked by uid 399); 7 May 2006 23:59:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 May 2006 23:59:51 -0000 Message-ID: <445E89F3.3000805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 16:59:47 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce A. Mah" References: <001301c670ef$3709ed90$4001a8c0@jarasoft.net> <20060506110321.X17611@fledge.watson.org> <20060506100716.GA20622@marvin.harmless.hu> <20060506111108.E46997@fledge.watson.org> <20060506101429.GA15156@marvin.harmless.hu> <20060506111543.G46997@fledge.watson.org> <445CD55C.1030101@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <445CD55C.1030101@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gergely CZUCZY , Robert Watson , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 23:59:52 -0000 Bruce A. Mah wrote: > I know that a lot of > people are anxiously awaiting 6.1-RELEASE and it's been a *long* release > cycle...just be patient a little longer... And for those of you who can't be patient, there is nothing stopping you from cvsup'ing and building it yourself. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 00:39:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F1416A400; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:39:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429B743D45; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:39:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k480deOU044195; Sun, 7 May 2006 21:39:41 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: Sam Leffler Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:39:33 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <445D3C94.10102@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <445D3C94.10102@errno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_GNpXE9L9moyWROO" Message-Id: <200605072139.34339.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new ath hal (take 2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 00:39:54 -0000 --Boundary-00=_GNpXE9L9moyWROO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 06 May 2006 21:17, Sam Leffler wrote: > A new test snapshot is available at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/ath_hal-20060506.tgz > > This is 0.9.17.0 and is known to work on sparc (tested) and may well > work on alpha (untested but likely the same issue that broke sparc). > > This code should be a drop-in replacement for what's in cvs in HEAD but > be sure to rebuild both the driver and rate control module as there are > ABI changes. Note that to use this hal with RELENG_6 or other branches > other than HEAD you must have rev 1.143 of if_ath.c. To build a sparc > module you must have rev 1.5 of modules/ath_hal/Makefile and rev 1.539 > of conf/options. > I attached a patch for if_ath.c on releng_6=20 with it the hal should compile on i386 and amd64 fine but at the end for my card, the DWL-AG530, nothing changed ath_hal: 0.9.17.0 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) ath0: mem 0xfae00000-0xfae0ffff irq 16 at device 11.0 on pci0 ath0: Ethernet address: 00:11:95:c2:2a:80 ath0: mac 5.9 phy 4.3 radio 3.6 setting to regdomain 16 Channel 1 : 2412 Mhz 11g Channel 48 : 5240 Mhz 11a Channel 2 : 2417 Mhz 11g Channel 50 : 5250 Mhz 11a Turbo Channel 3 : 2422 Mhz 11g Channel 52 : 5260 Mhz 11a Channel 4 : 2427 Mhz 11g Channel 56 : 5280 Mhz 11a Channel 5 : 2432 Mhz 11g Channel 58 : 5290 Mhz 11a Turbo Channel 6 : 2437 Mhz 11g Channel 60 : 5300 Mhz 11a Channel 7 : 2442 Mhz 11g Channel 64 : 5320 Mhz 11a Channel 8 : 2447 Mhz 11g Channel 149 : 5745 Mhz 11a Channel 9 : 2452 Mhz 11g Channel 152 : 5760 Mhz 11a Turbo Channel 10 : 2457 Mhz 11g Channel 153 : 5765 Mhz 11a Channel 11 : 2462 Mhz 11g Channel 157 : 5785 Mhz 11a Channel 36 : 5180 Mhz 11a Channel 160 : 5800 Mhz 11a Turbo Channel 40 : 5200 Mhz 11a Channel 161 : 5805 Mhz 11a Channel 42 : 5210 Mhz 11a Turbo Channel 165 : 5825 Mhz 11a Channel 44 : 5220 Mhz 11a setting regdomain 18 Channel 1 : 2412 Mhz 11g Channel 136 : 4942* Mhz 11a Channel 2 : 2417 Mhz 11g Channel 136 : 4945* Mhz 11a Channel 3 : 2422 Mhz 11g Channel 136 : 4950* Mhz 11a Channel 4 : 2427 Mhz 11g Channel 137 : 4955* Mhz 11a Channel 5 : 2432 Mhz 11g Channel 137 : 4960* Mhz 11a Channel 6 : 2437 Mhz 11g Channel 137 : 4965* Mhz 11a Channel 7 : 2442 Mhz 11g Channel 137 : 4970* Mhz 11a Channel 8 : 2447 Mhz 11g Channel 138 : 4975* Mhz 11a Channel 9 : 2452 Mhz 11g Channel 138 : 4980* Mhz 11a Channel 10 : 2457 Mhz 11g Channel 138 : 4985* Mhz 11a Channel 11 : 2462 Mhz 11g Jo=E3o --Boundary-00=_GNpXE9L9moyWROO Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="if_ath.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="if_ath.patch" --- if_ath.c.ori Sun May 7 20:38:42 2006 +++ if_ath.c Sun May 7 07:18:07 2006 @@ -293,7 +293,8 @@ if_initname(ifp, device_get_name(sc->sc_dev), device_get_unit(sc->sc_dev)); - ah = ath_hal_attach(devid, sc, sc->sc_st, sc->sc_sh, &status); + ah = ath_hal_attach(devid, sc, (HAL_BUS_TAG) sc->sc_st, + (HAL_BUS_HANDLE) sc->sc_sh, &status); if (ah == NULL) { if_printf(ifp, "unable to attach hardware; HAL status %u\n", status); @@ -750,15 +749,9 @@ DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_INTR, "%s: status 0x%x\n", __func__, status); status &= sc->sc_imask; /* discard unasked for bits */ if (status & HAL_INT_FATAL) { - /* - * Fatal errors are unrecoverable. Typically - * these are caused by DMA errors. Unfortunately - * the exact reason is not (presently) returned - * by the hal. - */ sc->sc_stats.ast_hardware++; ath_hal_intrset(ah, 0); /* disable intr's until reset */ - taskqueue_enqueue(sc->sc_tq, &sc->sc_fataltask); + ath_fatal_proc(sc, 0); } else if (status & HAL_INT_RXORN) { sc->sc_stats.ast_rxorn++; ath_hal_intrset(ah, 0); /* disable intr's until reset */ @@ -817,8 +810,21 @@ { struct ath_softc *sc = arg; struct ifnet *ifp = sc->sc_ifp; + u_int32_t *state; + u_int32_t len; if_printf(ifp, "hardware error; resetting\n"); + /* + * Fatal errors are unrecoverable. Typically these + * are caused by DMA errors. Collect h/w state from + * the hal so we can diagnose what's going on. + */ + if (ath_hal_getfatalstate(sc->sc_ah, &state, &len)) { + KASSERT(len >= 6*sizeof(u_int32_t), ("len %u bytes", len)); + if_printf(ifp, "0x%08x 0x%08x 0x%08x, 0x%08x 0x%08x 0x%08x\n", + state[0], state[1] , state[2], state[3], + state[4], state[5]); + } ath_reset(ifp); } @@ -1924,7 +1930,7 @@ const HAL_RATE_TABLE *rt; u_int8_t rix, rate; - DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_BEACON, "%s: m %p len %u\n", + DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_BEACON_PROC, "%s: m %p len %u\n", __func__, m, m->m_len); /* setup descriptors */ @@ -2010,14 +2016,14 @@ } /* * Check if the previous beacon has gone out. If - * not don't don't try to post another, skip this - * period and wait for the next. Missed beacons - * indicate a problem and should not occur. If we - * miss too many consecutive beacons reset the device. + * not don't try to post another, skip this period + * and wait for the next. Missed beacons indicate + * a problem and should not occur. If we miss too + * many consecutive beacons reset the device. */ if (ath_hal_numtxpending(ah, sc->sc_bhalq) != 0) { sc->sc_bmisscount++; - DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_BEACON_PROC, + DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_BEACON, "%s: missed %u consecutive beacons\n", __func__, sc->sc_bmisscount); if (sc->sc_bmisscount > 3) /* NB: 3 is a guess */ @@ -2568,7 +2574,6 @@ rssi = HAL_EP_RND(avgrssi, HAL_RSSI_EP_MULTIPLIER); else rssi = ni->ni_rssi; - /* NB: theoretically we shouldn't need this, but be paranoid */ return rssi < 0 ? 0 : rssi > 127 ? 127 : rssi; #undef HAL_EP_RND } @@ -2916,7 +2921,7 @@ /* * Sync and unmap the frame. At this point we're * committed to passing the mbuf somewhere so clear - * bf_m; this means a new sk_buff must be allocated + * bf_m; this means a new mbuf must be allocated * when the rx descriptor is setup again to receive * another frame. */ @@ -3978,9 +3983,12 @@ ATH_TXQ_REMOVE_HEAD(txq, bf_list); ATH_TXQ_UNLOCK(txq); #ifdef ATH_DEBUG - if (sc->sc_debug & ATH_DEBUG_RESET) + if (sc->sc_debug & ATH_DEBUG_RESET) { ath_printtxbuf(bf, txq->axq_qnum, ix, ath_hal_txprocdesc(ah, bf->bf_desc) == HAL_OK); + ieee80211_dump_pkt(mtod(bf->bf_m, caddr_t), + bf->bf_m->m_len, 0, -1); + } #endif /* ATH_DEBUG */ bus_dmamap_unload(sc->sc_dmat, bf->bf_dmamap); m_freem(bf->bf_m); @@ -4004,11 +4012,11 @@ { struct ath_hal *ah = sc->sc_ah; - (void) ath_hal_stoptxdma(ah, txq->axq_qnum); DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_RESET, "%s: tx queue [%u] %p, link %p\n", __func__, txq->axq_qnum, (caddr_t)(uintptr_t) ath_hal_gettxbuf(ah, txq->axq_qnum), txq->axq_link); + (void) ath_hal_stoptxdma(ah, txq->axq_qnum); } /* @@ -4024,10 +4032,11 @@ /* XXX return value */ if (!sc->sc_invalid) { /* don't touch the hardware if marked invalid */ + DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_RESET, "%s: tx queue [%u] %p, link %p\n", + __func__, sc->sc_bhalq, + (caddr_t)(uintptr_t) ath_hal_gettxbuf(ah, sc->sc_bhalq), + NULL); (void) ath_hal_stoptxdma(ah, sc->sc_bhalq); - DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_RESET, - "%s: beacon queue %p\n", __func__, - (caddr_t)(uintptr_t) ath_hal_gettxbuf(ah, sc->sc_bhalq)); for (i = 0; i < HAL_NUM_TX_QUEUES; i++) if (ATH_TXQ_SETUP(sc, i)) ath_tx_stopdma(sc, &sc->sc_txq[i]); @@ -4035,6 +4044,17 @@ for (i = 0; i < HAL_NUM_TX_QUEUES; i++) if (ATH_TXQ_SETUP(sc, i)) ath_tx_draintxq(sc, &sc->sc_txq[i]); +#ifdef ATH_DEBUG + if (sc->sc_debug & ATH_DEBUG_RESET) { + struct ath_buf *bf = STAILQ_FIRST(&sc->sc_bbuf); + if (bf != NULL && bf->bf_m != NULL) { + ath_printtxbuf(bf, sc->sc_bhalq, 0, + ath_hal_txprocdesc(ah, bf->bf_desc) == HAL_OK); + ieee80211_dump_pkt(mtod(bf->bf_m, caddr_t), + bf->bf_m->m_len, 0, -1); + } + } +#endif /* ATH_DEBUG */ ifp->if_drv_flags &= ~IFF_DRV_OACTIVE; sc->sc_tx_timer = 0; } @@ -4567,6 +4587,9 @@ HAL_BOOL outdoor, HAL_BOOL xchanmode) { #define COMPAT (CHANNEL_ALL_NOTURBO|CHANNEL_PASSIVE) +#define IS_CHAN_PUBLIC_SAFETY(_c) \ + (((_c)->channelFlags & CHANNEL_5GHZ) && \ + ((_c)->channel > 4940 && (_c)->channel < 4990)) struct ieee80211com *ic = &sc->sc_ic; struct ifnet *ifp = sc->sc_ifp; struct ath_hal *ah = sc->sc_ah; @@ -4599,7 +4622,16 @@ HAL_CHANNEL *c = &chans[i]; u_int16_t flags; - ix = ath_hal_mhz2ieee(ah, c->channel, c->channelFlags); + /* + * XXX we're not ready to handle the ieee number mapping + * for public safety channels as they overlap with any + * 2GHz channels; for now use the non-public safety + * numbering which is non-overlapping. + */ + if (IS_CHAN_PUBLIC_SAFETY(c)) + ix = (c->channel - 4000) / 5; + else + ix = ath_hal_mhz2ieee(ah, c->channel, c->channelFlags); if (ix > IEEE80211_CHAN_MAX) { if_printf(ifp, "bad hal channel %d (%u/%x) ignored\n", ix, c->channel, c->channelFlags); @@ -4632,6 +4664,7 @@ } free(chans, M_TEMP); return 0; +#undef IS_CHAN_PUBLIC_SAFETY #undef COMPAT } --Boundary-00=_GNpXE9L9moyWROO-- A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 00:46:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5426216A40F; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3EB43D48; Mon, 8 May 2006 00:46:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k480kDiL044569; Sun, 7 May 2006 21:46:13 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:46:07 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <445D3C94.10102@errno.com> <200605072139.34339.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <200605072139.34339.joao@matik.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_PTpXE5WX4Sx8+9P" Message-Id: <200605072146.07500.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new ath hal (take 2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 00:46:15 -0000 --Boundary-00=_PTpXE5WX4Sx8+9P Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 07 May 2006 21:39, JoaoBR wrote: the former patch was the wrong one, sorry Jo=E3o --Boundary-00=_PTpXE5WX4Sx8+9P Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="if_ath.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="if_ath.patch" --- if_ath.c.ori Sun May 7 20:38:42 2006 +++ if_ath.c Sun May 7 07:18:07 2006 @@ -293,7 +293,8 @@ if_initname(ifp, device_get_name(sc->sc_dev), device_get_unit(sc->sc_dev)); - ah = ath_hal_attach(devid, sc, sc->sc_st, sc->sc_sh, &status); + ah = ath_hal_attach(devid, sc, (HAL_BUS_TAG) sc->sc_st, + (HAL_BUS_HANDLE) sc->sc_sh, &status); if (ah == NULL) { if_printf(ifp, "unable to attach hardware; HAL status %u\n", status); @@ -817,8 +810,21 @@ { struct ath_softc *sc = arg; struct ifnet *ifp = sc->sc_ifp; + u_int32_t *state; + u_int32_t len; if_printf(ifp, "hardware error; resetting\n"); + /* + * Fatal errors are unrecoverable. Typically these + * are caused by DMA errors. Collect h/w state from + * the hal so we can diagnose what's going on. + */ + if (ath_hal_getfatalstate(sc->sc_ah, &state, &len)) { + KASSERT(len >= 6*sizeof(u_int32_t), ("len %u bytes", len)); + if_printf(ifp, "0x%08x 0x%08x 0x%08x, 0x%08x 0x%08x 0x%08x\n", + state[0], state[1] , state[2], state[3], + state[4], state[5]); + } ath_reset(ifp); } @@ -1924,7 +1930,7 @@ const HAL_RATE_TABLE *rt; u_int8_t rix, rate; - DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_BEACON, "%s: m %p len %u\n", + DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_BEACON_PROC, "%s: m %p len %u\n", __func__, m, m->m_len); /* setup descriptors */ @@ -2010,14 +2016,14 @@ } /* * Check if the previous beacon has gone out. If - * not don't don't try to post another, skip this - * period and wait for the next. Missed beacons - * indicate a problem and should not occur. If we - * miss too many consecutive beacons reset the device. + * not don't try to post another, skip this period + * and wait for the next. Missed beacons indicate + * a problem and should not occur. If we miss too + * many consecutive beacons reset the device. */ if (ath_hal_numtxpending(ah, sc->sc_bhalq) != 0) { sc->sc_bmisscount++; - DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_BEACON_PROC, + DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_BEACON, "%s: missed %u consecutive beacons\n", __func__, sc->sc_bmisscount); if (sc->sc_bmisscount > 3) /* NB: 3 is a guess */ @@ -2568,7 +2574,6 @@ rssi = HAL_EP_RND(avgrssi, HAL_RSSI_EP_MULTIPLIER); else rssi = ni->ni_rssi; - /* NB: theoretically we shouldn't need this, but be paranoid */ return rssi < 0 ? 0 : rssi > 127 ? 127 : rssi; #undef HAL_EP_RND } @@ -2916,7 +2921,7 @@ /* * Sync and unmap the frame. At this point we're * committed to passing the mbuf somewhere so clear - * bf_m; this means a new sk_buff must be allocated + * bf_m; this means a new mbuf must be allocated * when the rx descriptor is setup again to receive * another frame. */ @@ -3978,9 +3983,12 @@ ATH_TXQ_REMOVE_HEAD(txq, bf_list); ATH_TXQ_UNLOCK(txq); #ifdef ATH_DEBUG - if (sc->sc_debug & ATH_DEBUG_RESET) + if (sc->sc_debug & ATH_DEBUG_RESET) { ath_printtxbuf(bf, txq->axq_qnum, ix, ath_hal_txprocdesc(ah, bf->bf_desc) == HAL_OK); + ieee80211_dump_pkt(mtod(bf->bf_m, caddr_t), + bf->bf_m->m_len, 0, -1); + } #endif /* ATH_DEBUG */ bus_dmamap_unload(sc->sc_dmat, bf->bf_dmamap); m_freem(bf->bf_m); @@ -4004,11 +4012,11 @@ { struct ath_hal *ah = sc->sc_ah; - (void) ath_hal_stoptxdma(ah, txq->axq_qnum); DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_RESET, "%s: tx queue [%u] %p, link %p\n", __func__, txq->axq_qnum, (caddr_t)(uintptr_t) ath_hal_gettxbuf(ah, txq->axq_qnum), txq->axq_link); + (void) ath_hal_stoptxdma(ah, txq->axq_qnum); } /* @@ -4024,10 +4032,11 @@ /* XXX return value */ if (!sc->sc_invalid) { /* don't touch the hardware if marked invalid */ + DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_RESET, "%s: tx queue [%u] %p, link %p\n", + __func__, sc->sc_bhalq, + (caddr_t)(uintptr_t) ath_hal_gettxbuf(ah, sc->sc_bhalq), + NULL); (void) ath_hal_stoptxdma(ah, sc->sc_bhalq); - DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_RESET, - "%s: beacon queue %p\n", __func__, - (caddr_t)(uintptr_t) ath_hal_gettxbuf(ah, sc->sc_bhalq)); for (i = 0; i < HAL_NUM_TX_QUEUES; i++) if (ATH_TXQ_SETUP(sc, i)) ath_tx_stopdma(sc, &sc->sc_txq[i]); @@ -4035,6 +4044,17 @@ for (i = 0; i < HAL_NUM_TX_QUEUES; i++) if (ATH_TXQ_SETUP(sc, i)) ath_tx_draintxq(sc, &sc->sc_txq[i]); +#ifdef ATH_DEBUG + if (sc->sc_debug & ATH_DEBUG_RESET) { + struct ath_buf *bf = STAILQ_FIRST(&sc->sc_bbuf); + if (bf != NULL && bf->bf_m != NULL) { + ath_printtxbuf(bf, sc->sc_bhalq, 0, + ath_hal_txprocdesc(ah, bf->bf_desc) == HAL_OK); + ieee80211_dump_pkt(mtod(bf->bf_m, caddr_t), + bf->bf_m->m_len, 0, -1); + } + } +#endif /* ATH_DEBUG */ ifp->if_drv_flags &= ~IFF_DRV_OACTIVE; sc->sc_tx_timer = 0; } @@ -4567,6 +4587,9 @@ HAL_BOOL outdoor, HAL_BOOL xchanmode) { #define COMPAT (CHANNEL_ALL_NOTURBO|CHANNEL_PASSIVE) +#define IS_CHAN_PUBLIC_SAFETY(_c) \ + (((_c)->channelFlags & CHANNEL_5GHZ) && \ + ((_c)->channel > 4940 && (_c)->channel < 4990)) struct ieee80211com *ic = &sc->sc_ic; struct ifnet *ifp = sc->sc_ifp; struct ath_hal *ah = sc->sc_ah; @@ -4599,7 +4622,16 @@ HAL_CHANNEL *c = &chans[i]; u_int16_t flags; - ix = ath_hal_mhz2ieee(ah, c->channel, c->channelFlags); + /* + * XXX we're not ready to handle the ieee number mapping + * for public safety channels as they overlap with any + * 2GHz channels; for now use the non-public safety + * numbering which is non-overlapping. + */ + if (IS_CHAN_PUBLIC_SAFETY(c)) + ix = (c->channel - 4000) / 5; + else + ix = ath_hal_mhz2ieee(ah, c->channel, c->channelFlags); if (ix > IEEE80211_CHAN_MAX) { if_printf(ifp, "bad hal channel %d (%u/%x) ignored\n", ix, c->channel, c->channelFlags); @@ -4632,6 +4664,7 @@ } free(chans, M_TEMP); return 0; +#undef IS_CHAN_PUBLIC_SAFETY #undef COMPAT } --Boundary-00=_PTpXE5WX4Sx8+9P-- A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:25:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D6816A40F for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:25:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig@feniz.gank.org) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E62843D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:25:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from craig@feniz.gank.org) Received: by ion.gank.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2AE81117B3; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:24:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:24:56 -0500 From: Craig Boston To: Yousef Raffah Message-ID: <20060508032456.GA15688@nowhere> Mail-Followup-To: Craig Boston , Yousef Raffah , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5AA@royal64.emp.zapto.org> <1147003560.814.35.camel@localhost.savola.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1147003560.814.35.camel@localhost.savola.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:25:02 -0000 On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:06:00PM +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote: > Why should I define it from the card's BIOS? Is it done through the > system's startup (F9)? IIRC for most of the Compaq RAID controllers you'll need the Smartstart CD that came with the server. A couple of the models I think can be configured in the BIOS, _IF_ everything in the setup partition is there, but that partition is usually on the array itself... That's if it's a compaq server -- unfortunately the Compaq controllers are real finnicky and don't like to work in non-compaq systems. I've had to resort to using a minimal NT4 install to configure one before. Craig From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 03:34:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D9B16A42C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn@datalinktech.com.au) Received: from customer-domains.icp-qv1-irony8.iinet.net.au (customer-domains.icp-qv1-irony8.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E675A43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 03:34:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidn@datalinktech.com.au) Received: from 203-206-162-119.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO mail.datalinktech.com.au) ([203.206.162.119]) by customer-domains.icp-qv1-irony8.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 08 May 2006 11:34:24 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,99,1146412800"; d="scan'208"; a="298575264:sNHT43250508" Received: from [192.168.4.232] ([192.168.4.232]) by mail.datalinktech.com.au with esmtp; Mon, 08 May 2006 13:34:22 +1000 id 00192A27.445EBC3E.000126E9 Message-ID: <445EBC38.9090301@datalinktech.com.au> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:34:16 +1000 From: David Nugent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060406 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Janet Sullivan References: <4457A02C.9040408@rogers.com> <20060503110503.O58458@fledge.watson.org> <35c231bf0605031821s582b6d03j3ee9d434a596f62a@mail.gmail.com> <20060504021908.GA714@soaustin.net> <35c231bf0605032011s65fbb1aby742438465ee98ee7@mail.gmail.com> <20060504033300.GA39935@xor.obsecurity.org> <44598615.3040400@rogers.com> <20060504044758.GA41047@xor.obsecurity.org> <44599732.1050905@rogers.com> <20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl> <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <445BCEE3.6040607@bgp4.net> In-Reply-To: <445BCEE3.6040607@bgp4.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 03:34:31 -0000 Janet Sullivan wrote: > Mike Jakubik wrote: > >> arrive at the sacrifice of stability. I think FreeBSD should only be >> released when known major bugs are worked out. A known broken release >> to me and most new users is useless, lets not release simply for the >> sake of numbering. > > > For me, and many other quiet users, FreeBSD *IS* stable. I've been > running 6.1 since the BETAs with no issues. Likewise, or at least very few. > No, I don't use quotas. I doubt the majority of FreeBSD users do. I don't either, but "the majority of FreeBSD users" is a shifting thing, and very hard to make generalisations about. Once quota was about shell users, now it's more common for mail servers to manage storage quotas in a more appropriate way according to their storage mechanism and there are less shell users due to more convenient and "user friendly" networking applications that provide functionality that can be more easily secured. Quotas are now used more often with samba than anything else, and of course it's use has skyrocketted in recent years for obvious reasons. So who knows... Regards, David From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 04:16:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D2816A425 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0664343D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:16:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FcxA3-000KEE-UZ; Mon, 08 May 2006 13:15:56 +0900 Message-ID: <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:15:54 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <20060324223317.2069564f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20060327185142.GC24315@soaustin.net> <200603271848.19010.joao@matik.com.br> <200603280221.28996.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20060328020840.GA8189@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060328034846.GA81006@0lsen.net> <20060328142215.GC65098@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 04:16:29 -0000 Pyun, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 04:22:15PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote.. > > > On Mar 28, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > and sparc64(SMP) and I never see above errors. The only issue known to > > > > me is occasional watchdog timeout error which I really want to fix. But > > > > the watchdog timeout error is hard to reproduce and I couldn't reproduce > > > > the error on my system. > > > > > > I'm still seeing the watchdog timeout on 5.5-PRERELEASE (uni-processor): > > > > > > Mar 22 14:47:04 belle kernel: sk0: watchdog timeout > > > Mar 24 08:37:19 belle kernel: sk0: watchdog timeout > > > Mar 27 04:09:15 belle kernel: sk0: watchdog timeout > > > > > > But at least the driver doesn't wedge the interface now. > > > > Yes, same here on 6.1-PRERELEASE: > > > > ch0: 10 slots, 1 drive, 1 picker, 0 portals > > sk0: watchdog timeout > > sk0: watchdog timeout > > > > Ok, here is a new patch that try to fix the watchdog timeout error. > I don't know it will eradicate the bug as I don't see the watchdog > error on my system. > The patch borrowed Yukon specific register definition from Linux > driver and adopted Yukon FIFO related operations from Linux. I don't > know exact meaning of the registers(it's just guessing) but it seems > it doesn't hurt on my system. > > You may have to download 4 files to build the driver. > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_skreg.h > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/xmaciireg.h > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/yukonreg.h > I compiled new sk driver on 6.1-RC, however I couldn't get it work. When I load module I get: May 8 12:04:56 proxy kernel: skc0: port 0xcc00-0xccff mem 0xfe3fc000-0xfe3fffff irq 20 at device 3.0 on pci6 May 8 12:04:56 proxy kernel: skc0: unknown media type: 0x31 May 8 12:04:56 proxy kernel: device_attach: skc0 attach returned 6 Machine: FreeBSD 6.1-RC #1: Mon May 8 11:40:01 ULAST 2006 tsgan@proxy.micom.mng.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PROXY ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (2992.52-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf43 Stepping = 3 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x641d> AMD Features=0x20100000 Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1073479680 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1041559552 (993 MB) ... pciconf -lv ... skc0@pci6:3:0: class=0x020000 card=0x432011ab chip=0x432011ab rev=0x14 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' device = '88E8001/8003/8010 Gigabit Ethernet Controller with Integrated PHY (copper)' class = network subclass = ethernet ... Is this NIC supported by if_sk driver? thanks, Ganbold From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 04:56:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3B716A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45C343D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 04:56:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1078658nzi for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 21:56:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=FLe86eTAUjPIBuC37IUUrdOdrf7UE9GeqKxBNgJYBlihUCZWgEVWDyv+3KCW2hAu5fyV4pMpcw0jcmgQo8unmN99XQiKFXbZH8HsqQUjKM5W8dIQSTOwxPadGDy4FN88cpF8YChQLBy23b7nQ5dYXas4YMHZZ0mQSU/CThaviP8= Received: by 10.37.12.70 with SMTP id p70mr1012909nzi; Sun, 07 May 2006 21:56:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 6sm3654220nzn.2006.05.07.21.56.39; Sun, 07 May 2006 21:56:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k484txJi002705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 May 2006 13:55:59 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k484txTr002704; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:55:59 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:55:59 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Ganbold Message-ID: <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20060324223317.2069564f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20060327185142.GC24315@soaustin.net> <200603271848.19010.joao@matik.com.br> <200603280221.28996.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20060328020840.GA8189@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060328034846.GA81006@0lsen.net> <20060328142215.GC65098@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 04:56:42 -0000 On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > Pyun, > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 04:22:15PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote.. > > > > On Mar 28, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > > and sparc64(SMP) and I never see above errors. The only issue > > known to > > > > > me is occasional watchdog timeout error which I really want to fix. > > But > > > > > the watchdog timeout error is hard to reproduce and I couldn't > > reproduce > > > > > the error on my system. > > > > > > > > I'm still seeing the watchdog timeout on 5.5-PRERELEASE > > (uni-processor): > > > > > > > > Mar 22 14:47:04 belle kernel: sk0: watchdog timeout > > > > Mar 24 08:37:19 belle kernel: sk0: watchdog timeout > > > > Mar 27 04:09:15 belle kernel: sk0: watchdog timeout > > > > > > > > But at least the driver doesn't wedge the interface now. > > > > > > Yes, same here on 6.1-PRERELEASE: > > > > > > ch0: 10 slots, 1 drive, 1 picker, 0 portals > > > sk0: watchdog timeout > > > sk0: watchdog timeout > > > > > > >Ok, here is a new patch that try to fix the watchdog timeout error. > >I don't know it will eradicate the bug as I don't see the watchdog > >error on my system. > >The patch borrowed Yukon specific register definition from Linux > >driver and adopted Yukon FIFO related operations from Linux. I don't > >know exact meaning of the registers(it's just guessing) but it seems > >it doesn't hurt on my system. > > > >You may have to download 4 files to build the driver. > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_skreg.h > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/xmaciireg.h > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/yukonreg.h > > > I compiled new sk driver on 6.1-RC, however I couldn't get it work. > When I load module I get: > > May 8 12:04:56 proxy kernel: skc0: port > 0xcc00-0xccff mem 0xfe3fc000-0xfe3fffff irq 20 at device 3.0 on pci6 > May 8 12:04:56 proxy kernel: skc0: unknown media type: 0x31 > May 8 12:04:56 proxy kernel: device_attach: skc0 attach returned 6 > > Machine: > FreeBSD 6.1-RC #1: Mon May 8 11:40:01 ULAST 2006 > tsgan@proxy.micom.mng.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PROXY > ACPI APIC Table: > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (2992.52-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf43 Stepping = 3 > > Features=0xbfebfbff > Features2=0x641d> > AMD Features=0x20100000 > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > real memory = 1073479680 (1023 MB) > avail memory = 1041559552 (993 MB) > ... > > pciconf -lv > ... > skc0@pci6:3:0: class=0x020000 card=0x432011ab chip=0x432011ab rev=0x14 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' > device = '88E8001/8003/8010 Gigabit Ethernet Controller with > Integrated PHY (copper)' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > ... > Is this NIC supported by if_sk driver? > Hmm, It seems that the NIC is SysKonnect V2.0(SK98XX2) which is supposed to work with sk(4). Did it ever work with sk(4)? I see there is differences between sk(4) and Linux skge driver in determining physical media type. It seems OpenBSD also used Linux skge approach. > thanks, > > Ganbold > -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 05:02:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681FE16A404 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB8843D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:02:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1079292nzi for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 22:02:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=CjOfkXADzPOgif/S8DxeSkPZlyb5muXA5DwK4IFi5xk5sH12xH0B7cA/k840ah+Qu7VrqnVD7uK8valP5cvwNUmabKarP7nVDUpXq5yedlUBGoJYSxpI5KVnvTJju+F7Un9nnNDyL4ubCP72TtLy2/tuxGQwmAbY/SUR8baslp0= Received: by 10.36.222.1 with SMTP id u1mr2881673nzg; Sun, 07 May 2006 22:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 19sm3642101nzp.2006.05.07.22.02.11; Sun, 07 May 2006 22:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k4851PXv002740 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 May 2006 14:01:25 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k4851Ifo002738; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:01:18 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:01:18 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Miles Lubin Message-ID: <20060508050118.GB1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20060505124058.N25705@junker.org> <20060505192954.GA8995@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060505202511.S54242@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20060506000504.X17786@junker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060506000504.X17786@junker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Wilko Bulte Subject: Re: sk0: watchdog timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 05:02:14 -0000 On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 12:10:46AM -0400, Miles Lubin wrote: > On Fri, 5 May 2006, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > >On Fri, 5 May 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > >>I had a similar event last night, on a P4 on an Asus P4P800. The current > >>driver is much less prone to this lockup problem than it used to be. In > >>my > >>case it does not have to be in a high-load situation, it appears to happen > >>rather randomly (and *very* infrequently) > >> > >>FreeBSD freebie.xs4all.nl 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #2: Thu > >>May > >>4 22:37:22 CEST 2006 > > > >The updated driver has been in HEAD for some days and the problem > >should be fixed there thanks to Pyun. See last commits to src/sys/dev/sk/* > > > >-- > >Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT > > > > > > > Is is possible and/or a good idea to just take the driver in head and > compile it with 6.1-RC? > If you have issues related with sk(4), you can take the driver in HEAD and compile, it should work on 6.1R. You may need to edit Makefile in order to reflect new location of sk(/sys/dev/sk) driver. > I know this is rather late in the release process, but given that this > issue will affect many people, I think it should be considered fixixing > this driver for 6.1. > > > Miles -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 05:26:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475E816A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C0B43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:26:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FcyFh-000KlN-Gq; Mon, 08 May 2006 14:25:49 +0900 Message-ID: <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:25:48 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <20060324223317.2069564f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20060327185142.GC24315@soaustin.net> <200603271848.19010.joao@matik.com.br> <200603280221.28996.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20060328020840.GA8189@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060328034846.GA81006@0lsen.net> <20060328142215.GC65098@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 05:26:08 -0000 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > Pyun, > > > > ... > > Is this NIC supported by if_sk driver? > > > > Hmm, It seems that the NIC is SysKonnect V2.0(SK98XX2) which is > supposed to work with sk(4). Did it ever work with sk(4)? > No, it is new server and it came with such additional NIC. > I see there is differences between sk(4) and Linux skge driver > in determining physical media type. It seems OpenBSD also > used Linux skge approach. > I'll try to take a look at linux/openbsd drivers. Ganbold > > thanks, > > > > Ganbold > > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 05:34:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6E616A404 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2CD243D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:34:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 13990 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 05:34:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gLpYwZqfcWkZOEP5Ndq1YaaCdThTueViN0I6tvWGdVxX/4R7Kcm8HNB1IEGoyvQw8QE07b6/sktq5Z/wqc8MHNzKG4o/9BpBxf9Umg0NAJSDDMx8xzFQ/nB1toXZXFID+PO3mlWmshfvNop0AMmiyZ6iG6TiHmx5kmimkPYWCus= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 May 2006 05:34:25 -0000 Message-ID: <445ED86A.2030801@rogers.com> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 01:34:34 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Nugent References: <4457A02C.9040408@rogers.com> <20060503110503.O58458@fledge.watson.org> <35c231bf0605031821s582b6d03j3ee9d434a596f62a@mail.gmail.com> <20060504021908.GA714@soaustin.net> <35c231bf0605032011s65fbb1aby742438465ee98ee7@mail.gmail.com> <20060504033300.GA39935@xor.obsecurity.org> <44598615.3040400@rogers.com> <20060504044758.GA41047@xor.obsecurity.org> <44599732.1050905@rogers.com> <20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl> <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <445BCEE3.6040607@bgp4.net> <445EBC38.9090301@datalinktech.com.au> In-Reply-To: <445EBC38.9090301@datalinktech.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Janet Sullivan , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 05:34:27 -0000 David Nugent wrote: > Janet Sullivan wrote: >> No, I don't use quotas. I doubt the majority of FreeBSD users do. > > I don't either, but "the majority of FreeBSD users" is a shifting > thing, and very hard to make generalisations about. Once quota was > about shell users, now it's more common for mail servers to manage > storage quotas in a more appropriate way according to their storage > mechanism and there are less shell users due to more convenient and > "user friendly" networking applications that provide functionality > that can be more easily secured. > > Quotas are now used more often with samba than anything else, and of > course it's use has skyrocketted in recent years for obvious reasons. > So who knows... Quotas are important to certain mail servers as you mention, and they are also very important for webhosting. Hosting solutions such as Plesk utilize quotas. As we all know, fbsd has been the OS of choice for webhosting, lets not let that slip away. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 05:36:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC7916A40A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DFC43D88 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:35:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968AC1A3C19; Sun, 7 May 2006 22:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D4E1851695; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:35:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 01:35:58 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mike Jakubik Message-ID: <20060508053558.GA16540@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060504033300.GA39935@xor.obsecurity.org> <44598615.3040400@rogers.com> <20060504044758.GA41047@xor.obsecurity.org> <44599732.1050905@rogers.com> <20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl> <35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com> <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <445BCEE3.6040607@bgp4.net> <445EBC38.9090301@datalinktech.com.au> <445ED86A.2030801@rogers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445ED86A.2030801@rogers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Janet Sullivan , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, David Nugent Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 05:36:10 -0000 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:34:34AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > David Nugent wrote: > >Janet Sullivan wrote: > >>No, I don't use quotas. I doubt the majority of FreeBSD users do. > > > >I don't either, but "the majority of FreeBSD users" is a shifting=20 > >thing, and very hard to make generalisations about. Once quota was=20 > >about shell users, now it's more common for mail servers to manage=20 > >storage quotas in a more appropriate way according to their storage=20 > >mechanism and there are less shell users due to more convenient and=20 > >"user friendly" networking applications that provide functionality=20 > >that can be more easily secured. > > > >Quotas are now used more often with samba than anything else, and of=20 > >course it's use has skyrocketted in recent years for obvious reasons.=20 > >So who knows... >=20 > Quotas are important to certain mail servers as you mention, and they=20 > are also very important for webhosting. Hosting solutions such as Plesk= =20 > utilize quotas. As we all know, fbsd has been the OS of choice for=20 > webhosting, lets not let that slip away. Feel free to stop beating the dead horse any day now... Kris --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXti+Wry0BWjoQKURAp3aAJ41TziscAWvEpN6PwaN2syj/6nujgCfZXPV rtpXrhU6+XOV40k/6EfmpkE= =DHaW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 05:54:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9364916A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:54:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from heathrow.savoladns.com (heathrow.savoladns.com [212.12.174.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C15A843D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:53:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from ocs.savola.com (ocs.savola.com [222.22.1.211]) by heathrow.savoladns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8C59586C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:53:57 +0300 (AST) Received: from 222.22.1.191 by ocs.savola.com with ESMTP id 56891811147066965; Mon, 08 May 2006 08:42:45 +0300 From: Yousef Raffah To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <445E2168.7080609@jim-liesl.org> References: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5AB@royal64.emp.zapto.org> <445E2168.7080609@jim-liesl.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-33E5ckmE00kJtXwKTYQq" Organization: The Savola Group Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:54:03 +0300 Message-Id: <1147067643.1047.2.camel@localhost.savola.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: Re: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yraffah@savola.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 05:54:00 -0000 --=-33E5ckmE00kJtXwKTYQq Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:33 -0600, security wrote: > Daniel Eriksson wrote: >=20 > >Yousef Raffah wrote: > > =20 > > > >>How can I have my volumes configured? Is it after the system is being > >>installed or during installation? Please forgive my newbie=20 > >>questions :| > >> =20 > >> > > > >You need to configure your arrays BEFORE you install FreeBSD. Once the > >arrays have been set up properly you can install FreeBSD. Because the > >card presents each array that you have defined as a regular disk to the > >system, just select the appropriate disk (most likely da0) during > >sysinstall to get FreeBSD to partition/slice it up for you. > > =20 > > > Try and get the SmartStart CD's (from HP). It'll make setting up lots=20 > easier and you can load the latest code on the controllers. OK, I found out that my array has been already set up as RAID 5, which is what I'm looking for. Do you think it is time now to configure the volumes or is there something else needs to be done before that? -- Sincerely, Yousef Raffah Senior Systems Administrator -- Aren't you using Firefox? Get it at http://www.getfirefox.com --=-33E5ckmE00kJtXwKTYQq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXtz7H9IXMb4e6CMRApK+AKCd8IbBxXQLCbcedPIhJZHKDdqksQCg2pCE bVCi1H5BTyMAgWKJiLsjbp8= =mQah -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-33E5ckmE00kJtXwKTYQq-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 05:54:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B8416A419 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2D743D53 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 05:54:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1084784nzi for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 22:54:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ZpprkwilkVA4Z0P2z6IvdWiFUDmBFehFTnQPjU/E5wGx7L+lTLi5PleMobLM4wmoOxcI/HbeJTg+dsxboX2RW0vg3V+46lmEf5VW56O9PrOVpvk3iWGzxoOlbeJoZdij2ZWhTC25qm0pWCFrM5BBzwXf7CRK1AZd6rBgn5RTYRk= Received: by 10.36.250.10 with SMTP id x10mr2945081nzh; Sun, 07 May 2006 22:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 10sm3737645nzo.2006.05.07.22.54.21; Sun, 07 May 2006 22:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k485rg6P003063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 May 2006 14:53:42 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k485rfcX003062; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:53:41 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:53:41 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Ganbold Message-ID: <20060508055341.GC1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20060327185142.GC24315@soaustin.net> <200603271848.19010.joao@matik.com.br> <200603280221.28996.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20060328020840.GA8189@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060328034846.GA81006@0lsen.net> <20060328142215.GC65098@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 05:54:26 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 02:25:48PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > > Pyun, > > > > > > ... > > > Is this NIC supported by if_sk driver? > > > > > > >Hmm, It seems that the NIC is SysKonnect V2.0(SK98XX2) which is > >supposed to work with sk(4). Did it ever work with sk(4)? > > > No, it is new server and it came with such additional NIC. > >I see there is differences between sk(4) and Linux skge driver > >in determining physical media type. It seems OpenBSD also > >used Linux skge approach. > > > I'll try to take a look at linux/openbsd drivers. > How about attached one? It's not tested but it may help your situation. > Ganbold > > > thanks, > > > > > > Ganbold > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="if_sk.media.patch" --- if_sk.c.orig Thu May 4 10:27:39 2006 +++ if_sk.c Mon May 8 14:48:33 2006 @@ -1604,14 +1604,15 @@ } } else { if (sc_if->sk_phytype < SK_PHYTYPE_MARV_COPPER && - sc->sk_pmd == IFM_1000_T) { + sc->sk_pmd != 'S') { /* not initialized, punt */ sc_if->sk_phytype = SK_PHYTYPE_MARV_COPPER; + sc->sk_coppertype = 1; } sc_if->sk_phyaddr = SK_PHYADDR_MARV; - if (sc->sk_pmd != IFM_1000_T && sc->sk_pmd != IFM_1000_CX) + if (!(sc->sk_coppertype)) sc_if->sk_phytype = SK_PHYTYPE_MARV_FIBER; } @@ -1788,31 +1789,12 @@ } /* Read and save physical media type */ - switch(sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_PMDTYPE)) { - case SK_PMD_1000BASESX: - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_SX; - break; - case SK_PMD_1000BASELX: - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_LX; - break; - case SK_PMD_1000BASECX: - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_CX; - break; - case SK_PMD_1000BASETX: - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_T; - break; - default: - if (SK_YUKON_FAMILY(sc->sk_type) && (sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_EPROM1) - & 0xF) < SK_PHYTYPE_MARV_COPPER) { - /* not initialized, punt */ - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_T; - break; - } - device_printf(dev, "unknown media type: 0x%x\n", - sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_PMDTYPE)); - error = ENXIO; - goto fail; - } + sc->sk_pmd = sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_PMDTYPE); + + if (sc->sk_pmd == 'T' || sc->sk_pmd == '1') + sc->sk_coppertype = 1; + else + sc->sk_coppertype = 0; /* Determine whether to name it with VPD PN or just make it up. * Marvell Yukon VPD PN seems to freqently be bogus. */ @@ -3722,17 +3704,10 @@ phy = SK_GPHY_INT_POL_HI | SK_GPHY_DIS_FC | SK_GPHY_DIS_SLEEP | SK_GPHY_ENA_XC | SK_GPHY_ANEG_ALL | SK_GPHY_ENA_PAUSE; - switch(sc_if->sk_softc->sk_pmd) { - case IFM_1000_SX: - case IFM_1000_LX: - phy |= SK_GPHY_FIBER; - break; - - case IFM_1000_CX: - case IFM_1000_T: + if (sc->sk_coppertype) phy |= SK_GPHY_COPPER; - break; - } + else + phy |= SK_GPHY_FIBER; SK_IF_WRITE_4(sc_if, 0, SK_GPHY_CTRL, phy | SK_GPHY_RESET_SET); DELAY(1000); --- if_skreg.h.orig Tue May 2 11:12:42 2006 +++ if_skreg.h Mon May 8 14:48:33 2006 @@ -1535,6 +1535,7 @@ u_int32_t sk_rboff; /* RAMbuffer offset */ u_int32_t sk_ramsize; /* amount of RAM on NIC */ u_int32_t sk_pmd; /* physical media type */ + u_int32_t sk_coppertype; u_int32_t sk_intrmask; int sk_int_mod; int sk_int_ticks; --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 06:14:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AE116A411 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD4343D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fcyzo-000L9E-J5; Mon, 08 May 2006 15:13:28 +0900 Message-ID: <445EE188.4010402@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:13:28 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <20060327185142.GC24315@soaustin.net> <200603271848.19010.joao@matik.com.br> <200603280221.28996.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20060328020840.GA8189@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060328034846.GA81006@0lsen.net> <20060328142215.GC65098@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> <20060508055341.GC1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20060508055341.GC1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 06:14:09 -0000 Pyun, I can not apply the patch cleanly on http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c What version of sk driver should I use? Ganbold Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 02:25:48PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > > > Pyun, > > > > > > > > ... > > > > Is this NIC supported by if_sk driver? > > > > > > > > > >Hmm, It seems that the NIC is SysKonnect V2.0(SK98XX2) which is > > >supposed to work with sk(4). Did it ever work with sk(4)? > > > > > No, it is new server and it came with such additional NIC. > > >I see there is differences between sk(4) and Linux skge driver > > >in determining physical media type. It seems OpenBSD also > > >used Linux skge approach. > > > > > I'll try to take a look at linux/openbsd drivers. > > > > How about attached one? It's not tested but it may help your > situation. > > > Ganbold > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > Ganbold > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --- if_sk.c.orig Thu May 4 10:27:39 2006 > +++ if_sk.c Mon May 8 14:48:33 2006 > @@ -1604,14 +1604,15 @@ > } > } else { > if (sc_if->sk_phytype < SK_PHYTYPE_MARV_COPPER && > - sc->sk_pmd == IFM_1000_T) { > + sc->sk_pmd != 'S') { > /* not initialized, punt */ > sc_if->sk_phytype = SK_PHYTYPE_MARV_COPPER; > + sc->sk_coppertype = 1; > } > > sc_if->sk_phyaddr = SK_PHYADDR_MARV; > > - if (sc->sk_pmd != IFM_1000_T && sc->sk_pmd != IFM_1000_CX) > + if (!(sc->sk_coppertype)) > sc_if->sk_phytype = SK_PHYTYPE_MARV_FIBER; > } > > @@ -1788,31 +1789,12 @@ > } > > /* Read and save physical media type */ > - switch(sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_PMDTYPE)) { > - case SK_PMD_1000BASESX: > - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_SX; > - break; > - case SK_PMD_1000BASELX: > - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_LX; > - break; > - case SK_PMD_1000BASECX: > - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_CX; > - break; > - case SK_PMD_1000BASETX: > - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_T; > - break; > - default: > - if (SK_YUKON_FAMILY(sc->sk_type) && (sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_EPROM1) > - & 0xF) < SK_PHYTYPE_MARV_COPPER) { > - /* not initialized, punt */ > - sc->sk_pmd = IFM_1000_T; > - break; > - } > - device_printf(dev, "unknown media type: 0x%x\n", > - sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_PMDTYPE)); > - error = ENXIO; > - goto fail; > - } > + sc->sk_pmd = sk_win_read_1(sc, SK_PMDTYPE); > + > + if (sc->sk_pmd == 'T' || sc->sk_pmd == '1') > + sc->sk_coppertype = 1; > + else > + sc->sk_coppertype = 0; > > /* Determine whether to name it with VPD PN or just make it up. > * Marvell Yukon VPD PN seems to freqently be bogus. */ > @@ -3722,17 +3704,10 @@ > phy = SK_GPHY_INT_POL_HI | SK_GPHY_DIS_FC | SK_GPHY_DIS_SLEEP | > SK_GPHY_ENA_XC | SK_GPHY_ANEG_ALL | SK_GPHY_ENA_PAUSE; > > - switch(sc_if->sk_softc->sk_pmd) { > - case IFM_1000_SX: > - case IFM_1000_LX: > - phy |= SK_GPHY_FIBER; > - break; > - > - case IFM_1000_CX: > - case IFM_1000_T: > + if (sc->sk_coppertype) > phy |= SK_GPHY_COPPER; > - break; > - } > + else > + phy |= SK_GPHY_FIBER; > > SK_IF_WRITE_4(sc_if, 0, SK_GPHY_CTRL, phy | SK_GPHY_RESET_SET); > DELAY(1000); > --- if_skreg.h.orig Tue May 2 11:12:42 2006 > +++ if_skreg.h Mon May 8 14:48:33 2006 > @@ -1535,6 +1535,7 @@ > u_int32_t sk_rboff; /* RAMbuffer offset */ > u_int32_t sk_ramsize; /* amount of RAM on NIC */ > u_int32_t sk_pmd; /* physical media type */ > + u_int32_t sk_coppertype; > u_int32_t sk_intrmask; > int sk_int_mod; > int sk_int_ticks; > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 06:19:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB4816A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:19:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A12343D4C for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:19:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1087549nzi for ; Sun, 07 May 2006 23:19:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ZNAUam+nFX5Hu2RvWxOmSicmD5iXo+Jllal5a4R1dcIgg9VDCXbw0L+1+oOGvNPrLCL4JSQbdMVcgfAf55XA2ggnVGlazsctoDYy8D6qEFp6QT6sb+YOPyLTnV3ECg0aQFvp8zHt+vLQEBqWjQIKfctHAxNTQ608FNAFGZAyLjI= Received: by 10.36.251.70 with SMTP id y70mr2670388nzh; Sun, 07 May 2006 23:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 14sm3336891nzp.2006.05.07.23.19.29; Sun, 07 May 2006 23:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k486IpTE003149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 May 2006 15:18:51 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k486IpuP003148; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:18:51 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:18:51 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Ganbold Message-ID: <20060508061851.GD1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <200603280221.28996.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20060328020840.GA8189@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060328034846.GA81006@0lsen.net> <20060328142215.GC65098@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> <20060508055341.GC1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EE188.4010402@micom.mng.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445EE188.4010402@micom.mng.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 06:19:32 -0000 On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:13:28PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > Pyun, > > I can not apply the patch cleanly on > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c > What version of sk driver should I use? > The patch was generated against HEAD. > Ganbold > -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 06:52:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE6416A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC4D43D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 06:52:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fczb1-000LY8-LP; Mon, 08 May 2006 15:51:55 +0900 Message-ID: <445EEA8B.3050508@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:51:55 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <200603280221.28996.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20060328020840.GA8189@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060328034846.GA81006@0lsen.net> <20060328142215.GC65098@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> <20060508055341.GC1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EE188.4010402@micom.mng.net> <20060508061851.GD1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20060508061851.GD1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 06:52:08 -0000 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:13:28PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > Pyun, > > > > I can not apply the patch cleanly on > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c > > What version of sk driver should I use? > > > > The patch was generated against HEAD. > I see, but how can I MFC to RELENG_6? I can't build it on RELENG_6. thanks, Ganbold > > Ganbold > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 07:15:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1705916A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 07:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E9343D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 07:15:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1094537nzi for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 00:15:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=FamkS1aWLJpd8rzuNrN188ua8nfEBEPgEQSOI0oCXbDokiOgmUDbntIQLlJDI4ZUNdM77Z7KPeREi+ooEVQC1b9m/mEFg2PzRSvYuVX9szncNQnZqczYa1q9a816bdTD9EJnM2rN/GHa6c9iFZd0Y1drQUv7vTa+zwtoZGD3s6o= Received: by 10.36.12.16 with SMTP id 16mr2734961nzl; Mon, 08 May 2006 00:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 12sm3831293nzn.2006.05.08.00.15.28; Mon, 08 May 2006 00:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k487Eojr003378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 May 2006 16:14:50 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k487EoOg003377; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:14:50 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:14:50 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Ganbold Message-ID: <20060508071450.GE1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20060328034846.GA81006@0lsen.net> <20060328142215.GC65098@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> <20060508055341.GC1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EE188.4010402@micom.mng.net> <20060508061851.GD1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EEA8B.3050508@micom.mng.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445EEA8B.3050508@micom.mng.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 07:15:31 -0000 On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:51:55PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:13:28PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > > Pyun, > > > > > > I can not apply the patch cleanly on > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c > > > What version of sk driver should I use? > > > > > > >The patch was generated against HEAD. > > > I see, but how can I MFC to RELENG_6? I can't build it on RELENG_6. > Ok, copy the following files to /sys/dev/sk.(You may need to create the directory on 6.x.) >From the files in http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/ if_sk.c --> /sys/dev/sk if_skreg.h --> /sys/dev/sk xmaciireg.h --> /sys/dev/sk yukonreg.h --> /sys/dev/sk And Makefile --> /sys/modules/sk > thanks, > > Ganbold > > > > Ganbold > > > > > > -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 07:22:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5428716A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 07:22:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jared@little-miracles.org) Received: from mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony3.iinet.net.au (ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony3.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B8343D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 07:22:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jared@little-miracles.org) Received: from 203-206-85-192.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO eternity.thanhandjared.net) ([203.206.85.192]) by mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony3.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 08 May 2006 15:22:34 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,100,1146412800"; d="scan'208"; a="773211034:sNHT291572800" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (seduction.thanhandjared.net [192.168.0.1]) by eternity.thanhandjared.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B350BA12; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:22:34 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <445EF1B9.80900@little-miracles.org> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:22:33 +1000 From: Jared User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jared References: <44599C9C.3050706@little-miracles.org> In-Reply-To: <44599C9C.3050706@little-miracles.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA Failure Introduced between 6.0 and 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 07:22:40 -0000 Just a follow up. -RC2 did not resolve this problem, nor did 6.1-STABLE (as of around 8hrs ago). I am eager to work with the community in resolving these issues. I have applied the patches described at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/nve/if_nve.c.diff?r1=1.18&r2=1.19&f=h and http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/nve/if_nvereg.h.diff?r1=1.6&r2=1.7&f=h in order to get the Onboard ethernet to work. These problems exist even without applying that patch however. Below is a dmesg and uname of an affected machine: Cheers J [jared@aoi ~]$ dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #1: Mon May 8 11:49:24 EST 2006 root@aoi:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3700+ (2210.07-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x30f72 Stepping = 2 Features=0x78bfbff Features2=0x1 AMD Features=0xe2500800 AMD Features2=0x1 real memory = 1056702464 (1007 MB) avail memory = 1008156672 (961 MB) kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x508-0x50b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.4 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.5 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.6 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.7 (no driver attached) pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 3.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 4.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 9.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 10.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xfebde000-0xfebdefff irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfebdfc00-0xfebdfcff irq 7 at device 11.1 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: EHCI version 1.0 usb1: companion controller, 8 ports each: usb0 usb1: on ehci0 usb1: USB revision 2.0 uhub1: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 13.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xe800-0xe807,0xe480-0xe483,0xe400-0xe407,0xe080-0xe083,0xe000-0xe00f mem 0xfebdd000-0xfebddfff irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 atapci2: port 0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd880-0xd883,0xd800-0xd807,0xd480-0xd483,0xd400-0xd40f mem 0xfebdc000-0xfebdcfff irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0 ata4: on atapci2 ata5: on atapci2 pcib4: at device 16.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 nve0: port 0xd080-0xd087 mem 0xfebdb000-0xfebdbfff irq 7 at device 20.0 on pci0 nve0: Ethernet address 00:15:f2:5e:58:09 miibus0: on nve0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto nve0: Ethernet address: 00:15:f2:5e:58:09 acpi_button0: on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse Explorer, device ID 4 ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 8250 or not responding sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ugen0: Powerware Powerware UPS, rev 0.20/0.50, addr 2 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2210072188 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (amr_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 ad0: 152627MB at ata0-master UDMA100 ad1: 152627MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA300 GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0 created (id=124972809). GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad0 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad0 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider mirror/gm0 launched. ad8: 238475MB at ata4-master SATA300 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/mirror/gm0s1a nve0: device timeout (1) nve0: link state changed to DOWN nve0: link state changed to UP [jared@aoi ~]$ uname -a FreeBSD aoi 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #1: Mon May 8 11:49:24 EST 2006 root@aoi:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Jared wrote: > Hi -stable! > > I'd like to bring something to the attention of -stable that was posted > to -amd64 but has not yet being resolved: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=amd64/95554 > > I'm unable to test to see if this occurs on i386 aswell so am unsure if > this is the right list to post to. But it appears to me that it would be > something that should be addressed prior to 6.1-RELEASE. > > I am experiencing the same problem as described in the original PR, but > with Western Digital hard drives and the latest BIOS version (1001) > which is known to fix the ACPI DSDT bugs that have plagued these boards. > > I have not liased with the mailling lists before if you need any more > information please ask and I'll supply what I can as best I can. But the > original PR is well written. > > I will also see if RC-2 resolves this when cvsup has RC2 and I can build > an RC2 world/kernel. > > Cheers > and Thanks for a great operating system > > Jared > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 07:41:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296AA16A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 07:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn@datalinktech.com.au) Received: from customer-domains.icp-qv1-irony8.iinet.net.au (customer-domains.icp-qv1-irony8.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6958743D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 07:41:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidn@datalinktech.com.au) Received: from 203-206-162-119.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO mail.datalinktech.com.au) ([203.206.162.119]) by customer-domains.icp-qv1-irony8.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 08 May 2006 15:41:26 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,100,1146412800"; d="scan'208"; a="298816527:sNHT20672034" Received: from [192.168.4.232] ([192.168.4.232]) by mail.datalinktech.com.au with esmtp; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:41:23 +1000 id 00192A29.445EF623.00013165 Message-ID: <445EF61D.3060009@datalinktech.com.au> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:41:17 +1000 From: David Nugent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060406 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Gerhards References: <55123.193.138.135.19.1146922482.squirrel@sigma.interami.com> <1pqui3-v11.ln1@hmg.homeunix.net> In-Reply-To: <1pqui3-v11.ln1@hmg.homeunix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with sk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 07:41:34 -0000 Michael Gerhards wrote: >But by browsing through this list I found the thread "sk0: watchdog timeout" >and the problem described there is quite similiar to what I get here. So >perhaps this bug in the sk driver is also the cause for my trouble here?! > > Possibly (and even likely). It sounds like a very severe case of the same thing. I have been running a Marvell/Yukon 100mb adapter on FreeBSD RELENG_6 (the onboard NIC on an ASUS mb) and it does sometimes reset connections and dmesg shows the timeout maybe 2 or 3 times a day. The system is used in-house only and does not have high load (well, except for burst load when serving samba and NFS shared ${PORTSDIR}/distfiles, which overall works fine), so it is useable with the occasional but rarely noticeable glitch, like a connection pausing for 10-15 seconds then resuming. Currently running: FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Feb 23 09:03:11 EST 2006 ~ skc0: port 0xd400-0xd4ff mem 0xfeaf8000-0xfeafbfff irq 22 at device 5.0 on pci2 skc0: Marvell Yukon Lite Gigabit Ethernet rev. A3(0x7) sk0: on skc0 I should mention that this is a vast improvement from a couple years ago under 5.0 and 5.1 it would attach the driver to the card but the interface was not functional at all. >Can I somehow use this patch for sk0 _without_ changing everything to >-current? Acutually, I wanted to stay to 6.1-RELEASE... > > Apparently the timeout problem is fixed in -CURRENT, and will be merged after 6.1-RELEASE. Enjoy. Tracking -STABLE is a Good Thing, IMHO, quite aside from the security updates, bugs which don't even affect you right now (but may do sometime) get fixed, and the -STABLE tag tends to be quite appropriate. I only ever used -RELEASE media for the initial install. A system I run at home was originally installed from FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT, also now running a mid-Feb 6.1-PRERELEASE, upgraded from sources many many times over (build world+kernel takes just under 3 days). :-) Regards, David From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 07:53:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C962C16A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 07:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6B143D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 07:53:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd0YJ-000M5x-Ic; Mon, 08 May 2006 16:53:11 +0900 Message-ID: <445EF8E6.1040201@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:53:10 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <20060328034846.GA81006@0lsen.net> <20060328142215.GC65098@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> <20060508055341.GC1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EE188.4010402@micom.mng.net> <20060508061851.GD1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EEA8B.3050508@micom.mng.net> <20060508071450.GE1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20060508071450.GE1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 07:53:23 -0000 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:51:55PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:13:28PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > > > Pyun, > > > > > > > > I can not apply the patch cleanly on > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c > > > > What version of sk driver should I use? > > > > > > > > > >The patch was generated against HEAD. > > > > > I see, but how can I MFC to RELENG_6? I can't build it on RELENG_6. > > > > Ok, copy the following files to /sys/dev/sk.(You may need to create > the directory on 6.x.) > >From the files in http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/ > if_sk.c --> /sys/dev/sk > if_skreg.h --> /sys/dev/sk > xmaciireg.h --> /sys/dev/sk > yukonreg.h --> /sys/dev/sk > > And > Makefile --> /sys/modules/sk > Still can't compile. cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c In file included from /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:130: @/dev/sk/if_skreg.h:995:15: no newline at end of file /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:146: error: elements of array `sk_devs' have incomplete type /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:148: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:148: warning: (near initialization for `sk_devs[0]') /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:149: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:149: warning: (near initialization for `sk_devs[0]') ... Ganbold > > thanks, > > > > Ganbold > > > > > > Ganbold > > > > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:07:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B5216A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EE743D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:07:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so1070148ugf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 01:07:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=LNWk5bvhwyAnoE4iESwmjoZ6e/1zAz+Y230Ckm4+6/9OsmyPFEH8OmUPDxsf+pfnhXmNOAoonkB2LPbsQd0YayXLAG/Fwu2zoHLsHosmFA2Xe3LERUzxMeP5d0AdiOQDlykByjA/RNuAp24LlLmXfLD9d5ACIYWZlTDNs5VympU= Received: by 10.78.31.18 with SMTP id e18mr532753hue; Mon, 08 May 2006 01:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605080107j682d60c7hfa66cfc7b53b3a10@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:07:05 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <445E875C.8010602@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <18e02bd30605061659m4244e961wd4a334f5825fae3d@mail.gmail.com> <445E875C.8010602@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:07:07 -0000 On 5/8/06, Doug Barton wrote: > > Iantcho Vassilev wrote: > > Hello to all, > > > > > > I noticed such a problem: > > > > I have a 6.1 RC2 > > Step one should be to upgrade to the latest 6-stable, and run mergemaster= . I will do that in the next couple of days because i did it 5 days ago.. > and i have in rc.conf > > > > pf_enable=3D"YES" > > pflogd_enable=3D"YES" > > I think you already corrected yourself to say that you have pflog_enable, > not pflogd_, correct? I have pflog_enable from the beginning...in the list i made a mistake and wrote pflogd.. > but when the system boots i test with: > > > > pfctl -vs rules > > > > and there are not rules loaded.if i load them by hand there is no > problem.. > > When you say "load them by hand," what do you do exactly? I mean: pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf > then i made: > > > > rc_debug=3D"YES" > > Try adding rc_info=3Dyes as well. I have tried ..but nothing new is showing... > and the first thing that i saw was: when pf_enable is after pflogd_enable > ; > > it is not printed(checked).. > > The order of the variables in your rc.conf file is not relevant. > > > i put pf_load=3D"YES" >> /boot/loader.conf > > and still the ruleset is NOT loaded on boot... > > The rc system doesn't know anything about /boot/loader.conf. > > I'm also interested in what happens if you add -v to the pf_flags. What > are > the permissions on /etc/pf.conf? If i add pf_flags=3D"-v" nothing happens.. The permissions are: 755 Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:24:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F7A16A400; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06A543D45; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:24:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd11o-000MMN-UG; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:23:41 +0900 Message-ID: <445F000C.1080906@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:23:40 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Smirnoff Subject: re driver problem (RTL8169 chipset) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:24:03 -0000 Hi, I'm having trouble to make my Netgear Gigabit PCI GA311 network card work in 1000baseTX in FreeBSD-6.1RC. It runs fine on 100baseTX mode with Cat5 cable, however it doesn't with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling in 100baseTX/1000baseTX mode. It simply says no carrier. The system also panics right after the boot when it is connected 100baseTX network. When I disconnect the cable the system boots fine. I will test more this card in couple of days and will try to get debug messages when panics. The card is based on Realtec 8169S chipset. re0@pci0:12:0: class=0x020000 card=0x311a1385 chip=0x816910ec rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device = 'RTL8169 Gigabit Ethernet Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet daemon# uname -an FreeBSD daemon.micom.mng.net 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #10: Wed May 3 18:03:26 ULAST 2006 root@daemon.micom.mng.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DAEMON i386 Is there any such known issues with re driver? thanks, Ganbold From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:30:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9D316A402; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (gate.funkthat.com [69.17.45.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACF843D46; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (oo23dy86dqdsvwjf@localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k488U38s096616; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:30:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k488U28A096612; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 01:30:01 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney To: Ganbold Message-ID: <20060508083001.GG59504@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ganbold , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff References: <445F000C.1080906@micom.mng.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445F000C.1080906@micom.mng.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: re driver problem (RTL8169 chipset) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:30:12 -0000 Ganbold wrote this message on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 17:23 +0900: > I'm having trouble to make my Netgear Gigabit PCI GA311 network card > work in 1000baseTX in FreeBSD-6.1RC. It runs fine on 100baseTX mode with > Cat5 cable, however it doesn't with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling in Does it work at 1000baseTX w/ Cat5 cabling? -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:30:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B919A16A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC31C43D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:30:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1105126nzi for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 01:30:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Z5IuudKggM+5i8PQTFM6QmS3QF9ngaKB+b4S2q4BsTWZWDLFmV8VVAd/gtvh271mwvH1LyaZfBxT88ZuwBH2/67leW2+gAwjCdAMikVu29eFWsulvEnSpkDkdRJ5r6EU3tR5SKfpEUzz1L2K7tgX8u5eBYJOZ5UczTydetiObbE= Received: by 10.36.43.4 with SMTP id q4mr2838924nzq; Mon, 08 May 2006 01:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm3928240nza.2006.05.08.01.30.20; Mon, 08 May 2006 01:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k488TgmM003865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 May 2006 17:29:43 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k488TgER003864; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:29:42 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:29:42 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Ganbold Message-ID: <20060508082942.GF1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> <20060508055341.GC1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EE188.4010402@micom.mng.net> <20060508061851.GD1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EEA8B.3050508@micom.mng.net> <20060508071450.GE1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EF8E6.1040201@micom.mng.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445EF8E6.1040201@micom.mng.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:30:22 -0000 On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:53:10PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:51:55PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:13:28PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > > > > Pyun, > > > > > > > > > > I can not apply the patch cleanly on > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c > > > > > What version of sk driver should I use? > > > > > > > > > > > > >The patch was generated against HEAD. > > > > > > > I see, but how can I MFC to RELENG_6? I can't build it on RELENG_6. > > > > > > >Ok, copy the following files to /sys/dev/sk.(You may need to create > >the directory on 6.x.) > >>From the files in http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/ > >if_sk.c --> /sys/dev/sk > >if_skreg.h --> /sys/dev/sk > >xmaciireg.h --> /sys/dev/sk > >yukonreg.h --> /sys/dev/sk > > > >And > >Makefile --> /sys/modules/sk > > > Still can't compile. > > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE > -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include > -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c > In file included from /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:130: > @/dev/sk/if_skreg.h:995:15: no newline at end of file I can't understand. There *IS* a newline at the end of file. Checking with hd(1) shows a newline character. If it break it should also break HEAD tinderbox too. > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:146: error: elements of > array `sk_devs' have incomplete type > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:148: warning: excess > elements in struct initializer > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:148: warning: (near > initialization for `sk_devs[0]') > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:149: warning: excess > elements in struct initializer > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:149: warning: (near > initialization for `sk_devs[0]') > ... > > Ganbold > > > thanks, > > > > > > Ganbold > > > > > > > > Ganbold > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:35:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB0016A400; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F5C43D45; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:35:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd1DZ-000MSp-WB; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:35:50 +0900 Message-ID: <445F02E5.6010304@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:35:49 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ganbold , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff References: <445F000C.1080906@micom.mng.net> <20060508083001.GG59504@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20060508083001.GG59504@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: re driver problem (RTL8169 chipset) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:35:58 -0000 John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Ganbold wrote this message on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 17:23 +0900: > >> I'm having trouble to make my Netgear Gigabit PCI GA311 network card >> work in 1000baseTX in FreeBSD-6.1RC. It runs fine on 100baseTX mode with >> Cat5 cable, however it doesn't with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling in >> > > Does it work at 1000baseTX w/ Cat5 cabling? > I thought Cat5 only supports 100baseTX and I didn't test 1000baseTX w/ Cat5. It is not working at 1000baseTX with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling. Ganbold From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:40:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA0316A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9270C43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:40:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd1Hu-000MW6-P9; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:40:18 +0900 Message-ID: <445F03F2.2080907@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:40:18 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <20060329104842.GA12679@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EC5FA.10103@micom.mng.net> <20060508045559.GA1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445ED65C.1010703@micom.mng.net> <20060508055341.GC1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EE188.4010402@micom.mng.net> <20060508061851.GD1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EEA8B.3050508@micom.mng.net> <20060508071450.GE1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> <445EF8E6.1040201@micom.mng.net> <20060508082942.GF1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20060508082942.GF1239@cdnetworks.co.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:40:33 -0000 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:53:10PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:51:55PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:13:28PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > > > > > > Pyun, > > > > > > > > > > > > I can not apply the patch cleanly on > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c > > > > > > What version of sk driver should I use? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >The patch was generated against HEAD. > > > > > > > > > I see, but how can I MFC to RELENG_6? I can't build it on RELENG_6. > > > > > > > > > >Ok, copy the following files to /sys/dev/sk.(You may need to create > > >the directory on 6.x.) > > >>From the files in http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/ > > >if_sk.c --> /sys/dev/sk > > >if_skreg.h --> /sys/dev/sk > > >xmaciireg.h --> /sys/dev/sk > > >yukonreg.h --> /sys/dev/sk > > > > > >And > > >Makefile --> /sys/modules/sk > > > > > Still can't compile. > > > > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE > > -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include > > -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings > > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c > > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c > > In file included from /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:130: > > @/dev/sk/if_skreg.h:995:15: no newline at end of file > > I can't understand. There *IS* a newline at the end of file. > Checking with hd(1) shows a newline character. > > If it break it should also break HEAD tinderbox too. > I think new line is not a problem. The problematic line says "/usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:146: error: elements of array `sk_devs' have incomplete type" daemon# make Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/modules/sk cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:146: error: elements of array `sk_devs' have incomplete type /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:148: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ... Ganbold > > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:146: error: elements of > > array `sk_devs' have incomplete type > > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:148: warning: excess > > elements in struct initializer > > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:148: warning: (near > > initialization for `sk_devs[0]') > > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:149: warning: excess > > elements in struct initializer > > /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../dev/sk/if_sk.c:149: warning: (near > > initialization for `sk_devs[0]') > > ... > > > > Ganbold > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > Ganbold > > > > > > > > > > Ganbold > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:54:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDD816A401; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (gate.funkthat.com [69.17.45.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F240D43D64; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:54:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (k0tb2m4bnny18vu3@localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k488sioT097182; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:54:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k488shlW097179; Mon, 8 May 2006 01:54:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 01:54:42 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney To: Ganbold Message-ID: <20060508085442.GH59504@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ganbold , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff References: <445F000C.1080906@micom.mng.net> <20060508083001.GG59504@funkthat.com> <445F02E5.6010304@micom.mng.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445F02E5.6010304@micom.mng.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: re driver problem (RTL8169 chipset) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:54:49 -0000 Ganbold wrote this message on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 17:35 +0900: > John-Mark Gurney wrote: > >Ganbold wrote this message on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 17:23 +0900: > > > >>I'm having trouble to make my Netgear Gigabit PCI GA311 network card > >>work in 1000baseTX in FreeBSD-6.1RC. It runs fine on 100baseTX mode with > >>Cat5 cable, however it doesn't with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling in > > > >Does it work at 1000baseTX w/ Cat5 cabling? > > > I thought Cat5 only supports 100baseTX and I didn't test 1000baseTX w/ Cat5. Nope, 1000Base-T (no X) is speced for Cat5 cabling.. As per the 802.3 spec 40.1: 1000BASE-T signaling requires four pairs of Category 5 balanced cabling, as specified in ISO/IEC 11801:1995 and ANSI/EIA/TIA-568-A (1995) and tested for the additional performance parameters specified in 40.7 using testing procedures defined in proposed ANSI/TIA/EIA TSB95. > It is not working at 1000baseTX with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling. It's wierd that it works at 100Base-TX w/ Cat5, but not w/ Cat5e... Is there differences in the cable length or something? Have you tried w/ just normal Cat5? -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:58:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B4C16A404; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2454F43D4C; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:58:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd1Z9-000Mfd-93; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:58:07 +0900 Message-ID: <445F081E.80900@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:58:06 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ganbold , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff References: <445F000C.1080906@micom.mng.net> <20060508083001.GG59504@funkthat.com> <445F02E5.6010304@micom.mng.net> <20060508085442.GH59504@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20060508085442.GH59504@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: re driver problem (RTL8169 chipset) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:58:12 -0000 John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Ganbold wrote this message on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 17:35 +0900: > >> John-Mark Gurney wrote: >> >>> Ganbold wrote this message on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 17:23 +0900: >>> >>> >>>> I'm having trouble to make my Netgear Gigabit PCI GA311 network card >>>> work in 1000baseTX in FreeBSD-6.1RC. It runs fine on 100baseTX mode with >>>> Cat5 cable, however it doesn't with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling in >>>> >>> Does it work at 1000baseTX w/ Cat5 cabling? >>> >>> >> I thought Cat5 only supports 100baseTX and I didn't test 1000baseTX w/ Cat5. >> > > Nope, 1000Base-T (no X) is speced for Cat5 cabling.. As per the 802.3 > spec 40.1: > 1000BASE-T signaling requires four pairs of Category 5 balanced cabling, > as specified in ISO/IEC 11801:1995 and ANSI/EIA/TIA-568-A (1995) and > tested for the additional performance parameters specified in 40.7 using > testing procedures defined in proposed ANSI/TIA/EIA TSB95. > Ok. > >> It is not working at 1000baseTX with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling. >> > > It's wierd that it works at 100Base-TX w/ Cat5, but not w/ Cat5e... > Is there differences in the cable length or something? Not much difference. > Have you tried > w/ just normal Cat5? > Ok, I will test it again in couple of days and let you know. Ganbold From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 09:07:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5E216A415 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D7243D58 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id e2so1085468ugf for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 02:06:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nt1DIuJbIemiKE6lbz0MJ5Cq2SvPn0XcsdArxM9S49UfODJdBz+SlB3fJ45KH69EpJa11BjX4pBZQSuEkGxCdZ3rXZM3f5SMM7IKafwjNfayzGZj6i82tcau5mcQ29DESrpZu1G22g1N/WCPdSoT/2Ha3mgbBh8fAm2SS8SyUJk= Received: by 10.78.52.17 with SMTP id z17mr544039huz; Mon, 08 May 2006 02:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.16.16 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18e02bd30605080206x3c3c908blbcb1019f146d22da@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:06:58 +0300 From: "Iantcho Vassilev" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060508084807.GA16470@lpthe.jussieu.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060508084807.GA16470@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 09:07:04 -0000 On 5/8/06, Michel Talon wrote: > > By the way, if you have a kernel *without* IPV6 support, the firewall > module > will *not* load. You will have to recompile the firewall module without > IPV6 support first. This is the most common cause of the problem you are > seeing. > > > -- > > Michel TALON Thank you,Michel..,but it will not load on boot or? If this is true maybe this is the problem - i have disabled IPV6 in the kernel... From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 09:18:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ECA16A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from mail.ticketswitch.com (mail.ticketswitch.com [194.200.93.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2C843D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 09:18:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from [172.16.1.6] (helo=dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk) by mail.ticketswitch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1Fd1st-0002H5-HQ; Mon, 08 May 2006 10:18:31 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd1sp-000FeI-85; Mon, 08 May 2006 10:18:27 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, yraffah@savola.com In-Reply-To: <1147067643.1047.2.camel@localhost.savola.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 10:18:27 +0100 Cc: Subject: Re: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 09:18:33 -0000 > OK, I found out that my array has been already set up as RAID 5, which > is what I'm looking for. Do you think it is time now to configure the > volumes or is there something else needs to be done before that? If the array has been set up as RAID 5 then just go ahead and install FreeBSD on it. I run a lot of machines like this, including a couple of DL380's, and my home machine which has a COmpaq 5304 card plugged into an MSI amd64 motherboard quite happily. I usually try and istall a small Windows2000 partition on the machine as well though, so that I can run the Compaq ACU code to manage the array. It can be done from the BIOS, but there are a lot more features in the actual application. -pcf. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 10:22:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE9216A402 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from heathrow.savoladns.com (heathrow.savoladns.com [212.12.174.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AAAD43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:22:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yraffah@savola.com) Received: from ocs.savola.com (ocs.savola.com [222.22.1.211]) by heathrow.savoladns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF87D9585B for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:22:02 +0300 (AST) Received: from 222.22.1.191 by ocs.savola.com with ESMTP id 56969561147082991; Mon, 08 May 2006 13:09:51 +0300 From: Yousef Raffah To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qCw+vpxCz720ZEEJM6cw" Organization: The Savola Group Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:21:09 +0300 Message-Id: <1147083669.1047.19.camel@localhost.savola.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: Re: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: yraffah@savola.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 10:22:14 -0000 --=-qCw+vpxCz720ZEEJM6cw Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 10:18 +0100, Pete French wrote: > > OK, I found out that my array has been already set up as RAID 5, which > > is what I'm looking for. Do you think it is time now to configure the > > volumes or is there something else needs to be done before that? >=20 > If the array has been set up as RAID 5 then just go ahead and install > FreeBSD on it. I run a lot of machines like this, including a couple of > DL380's, and my home machine which has a COmpaq 5304 card plugged into > an MSI amd64 motherboard quite happily. >=20 OK great :) Thanks a lot for all those helped me. > I usually try and istall a small Windows2000 partition on the machine as = well > though, so that I can run the Compaq ACU code to manage the array. It can= be > done from the BIOS, but there are a lot more features in the actual > application. >=20 Might consider it for another server ;), thanks... > -pcf. -- Sincerely, Yousef Raffah Senior Systems Administrator -- Aren't you using Firefox? Get it at http://www.getfirefox.com --=-qCw+vpxCz720ZEEJM6cw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEXxuVH9IXMb4e6CMRAnt9AJsF1PzZjFcOy70K1OQDA2qpuWV4AQCgmwQx RsI/vpNxc1/ny6dEbZNuukc= =Lmp6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qCw+vpxCz720ZEEJM6cw-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 10:32:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445EA16A4E1 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B7F43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k48AWAlA096942; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:32:10 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:32:10 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Iantcho Vassilev In-Reply-To: <18e02bd30605080206x3c3c908blbcb1019f146d22da@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060508143014.Q40914@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060508084807.GA16470@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <18e02bd30605080206x3c3c908blbcb1019f146d22da@mail.gmail.com> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 08 May 2006 14:32:11 +0400 (MSD) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 10:32:13 -0000 On Mon, 8 May 2006, Iantcho Vassilev wrote: IV> > By the way, if you have a kernel *without* IPV6 support, the firewall IV> > module IV> > will *not* load. You will have to recompile the firewall module without IV> > IPV6 support first. This is the most common cause of the problem you are IV> > seeing. IV> IV> Thank you,Michel..,but it will not load on boot or? Neither, as it tries to refer to inet6 symbols; you have to build ipfw module with NO_INET6=yes too IV> If this is true maybe this is the problem - i have disabled IPV6 in the IV> kernel... Check `dmesg -a' output BTW, ipfw says ipfw2 (+ipv6) even when it is build without inet6, which is a bit misleading. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 10:36:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FE216A404 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D6F43D69 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:36:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k48Aaa1A099239; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:36:36 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:36:36 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Iantcho Vassilev In-Reply-To: <20060508143014.Q40914@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: <20060508143454.J40914@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060508084807.GA16470@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <18e02bd30605080206x3c3c908blbcb1019f146d22da@mail.gmail.com> <20060508143014.Q40914@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1381855321-1147084596=:40914" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 08 May 2006 14:36:36 +0400 (MSD) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 10:36:40 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1381855321-1147084596=:40914 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 8 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> BTW, ipfw says DM> DM> ipfw2 (+ipv6) DM> DM> even when it is build without inet6, which is a bit misleading. The following simple patch fixes this. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --0-1381855321-1147084596=:40914 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=ipfw2-ipv6.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20060508143636.I40914@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ipfw2-ipv6.patch SW5kZXg6IHN5cy9uZXRpbmV0L2lwX2Z3Mi5jDQo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09DQpSQ1MgZmlsZTogL2hvbWUvbmN2cy9zcmMvc3lzL25ldGluZXQv aXBfZncyLmMsdg0KcmV0cmlldmluZyByZXZpc2lvbiAxLjEwNi4yLjEyDQpk aWZmIC11IC1yMS4xMDYuMi4xMiBpcF9mdzIuYw0KLS0tIHN5cy9uZXRpbmV0 L2lwX2Z3Mi5jCTkgTWFyIDIwMDYgMTM6NDI6NDQgLTAwMDAJMS4xMDYuMi4x Mg0KKysrIHN5cy9uZXRpbmV0L2lwX2Z3Mi5jCTggTWF5IDIwMDYgMTA6MzY6 MTYgLTAwMDANCkBAIC00MjIxLDcgKzQyMjEsMTIgQEANCiAJfQ0KIA0KIAlp cF9md19kZWZhdWx0X3J1bGUgPSBsYXllcjNfY2hhaW4ucnVsZXM7DQotCXBy aW50ZigiaXBmdzIgKCtpcHY2KSBpbml0aWFsaXplZCwgZGl2ZXJ0ICVzLCAi DQorCXByaW50ZigNCisjaWZkZWYJTk9fSU5FVDYNCisJCSJpcGZ3MiBpbml0 aWFsaXplZCwgZGl2ZXJ0ICVzLCAiDQorI2Vsc2UNCisJCSJpcGZ3MiAoK2lw djYpIGluaXRpYWxpemVkLCBkaXZlcnQgJXMsICINCisjZW5kaWYNCiAJCSJy dWxlLWJhc2VkIGZvcndhcmRpbmcgIg0KICNpZmRlZiBJUEZJUkVXQUxMX0ZP UldBUkQNCiAJCSJlbmFibGVkLCAiDQo= --0-1381855321-1147084596=:40914-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 10:39:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9AC16A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8699F43D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:39:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k48AdqWW003376; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:39:52 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:39:52 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Iantcho Vassilev In-Reply-To: <20060508143454.J40914@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: <20060508143907.V40914@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060508084807.GA16470@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <18e02bd30605080206x3c3c908blbcb1019f146d22da@mail.gmail.com> <20060508143014.Q40914@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060508143454.J40914@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-466002436-1147084792=:40914" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 08 May 2006 14:39:52 +0400 (MSD) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf not loading the rules at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 10:39:54 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-466002436-1147084792=:40914 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 8 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> On Mon, 8 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> DM> DM> BTW, ipfw says DM> DM> DM> DM> ipfw2 (+ipv6) DM> DM> DM> DM> even when it is build without inet6, which is a bit misleading. DM> DM> The following simple patch fixes this. Oh no, INET6 should be used instead of NO_INET6. Reattached. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --0-466002436-1147084792=:40914 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=ipfw2-ipv6.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20060508143952.E40914@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ipfw2-ipv6.patch SW5kZXg6IHN5cy9uZXRpbmV0L2lwX2Z3Mi5jDQo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09DQpSQ1MgZmlsZTogL2hvbWUvbmN2cy9zcmMvc3lzL25ldGluZXQv aXBfZncyLmMsdg0KcmV0cmlldmluZyByZXZpc2lvbiAxLjEwNi4yLjEyDQpk aWZmIC11IC1yMS4xMDYuMi4xMiBpcF9mdzIuYw0KLS0tIHN5cy9uZXRpbmV0 L2lwX2Z3Mi5jCTkgTWFyIDIwMDYgMTM6NDI6NDQgLTAwMDAJMS4xMDYuMi4x Mg0KKysrIHN5cy9uZXRpbmV0L2lwX2Z3Mi5jCTggTWF5IDIwMDYgMTA6Mzc6 NTkgLTAwMDANCkBAIC00MjIxLDcgKzQyMjEsMTIgQEANCiAJfQ0KIA0KIAlp cF9md19kZWZhdWx0X3J1bGUgPSBsYXllcjNfY2hhaW4ucnVsZXM7DQotCXBy aW50ZigiaXBmdzIgKCtpcHY2KSBpbml0aWFsaXplZCwgZGl2ZXJ0ICVzLCAi DQorCXByaW50ZigNCisjaWZkZWYJSU5FVDYNCisJCSJpcGZ3MiAoK2lwdjYp IGluaXRpYWxpemVkLCBkaXZlcnQgJXMsICINCisjZWxzZQ0KKwkJImlwZncy IGluaXRpYWxpemVkLCBkaXZlcnQgJXMsICINCisjZW5kaWYNCiAJCSJydWxl LWJhc2VkIGZvcndhcmRpbmcgIg0KICNpZmRlZiBJUEZJUkVXQUxMX0ZPUldB UkQNCiAJCSJlbmFibGVkLCAiDQo= --0-466002436-1147084792=:40914-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 11:45:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0962E16A400; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EBF43D48; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:45:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k48BjPg0069561; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:45:25 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:45:17 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <445D3C94.10102@errno.com> <200605072146.07500.joao@matik.com.br> <445E9A3D.9090909@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <445E9A3D.9090909@errno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605080845.18125.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new ath hal (take 2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:45:29 -0000 On Sunday 07 May 2006 22:09, Sam Leffler wrote: > I don't know why you are posting patches like this; they include changes > that are not MFC'd for specific reasons. I've already told you > privately that the new hal has nothing to do with the issue of > supporting the 1/2 and 1/4-rate channels in the public safety band (as > enabled with regdomain 18). > > If people want to try the new hal on a branch other than HEAD they > should follow the directions I gave in my original mail (modulo my > obtuseness). I did not tell people to take the driver off head or > anything similar. You need ONE change; the change in rev 1.143 of > if_ath.c that explicitly casts the bus tag and bus handle parameters in > the call to ath_hal_attach. The main reason for the new hal is to fix > sparc64 support (and possibly alpha). > you are really a piece of work my friend first you give vague info and incorrect instructions and then you bark arou= nd=20 when I try to help others which might have had the same dificulties to foll= ow=20 your brilliant mind since you like to be specific, here it is: > is known to work on sparc (tested) and may well work on alpha does not mean at all that it is the "main reason" like you claim above and what you sell here: > Note that to use this hal with RELENG_6 or other branches other than HEA= D=20 you must have rev 1.143 of if_ath.c is incorrect or at least very very bad explained and this way (my patch) using part of if_ath.c v.1.143, the 4.9Ghz channel= =20 mismatch (overlapping with 11g channels) is very well addressed=20 and even if it has nothing to do with the 9.17 HAL it resolves for now the= =20 issue and to answer your assumptions, I never said this is a MFC patch or whateve= r=20 and is ment only to help whom may be interested to build the 9.17 HAL on=20 releng_6 I hope you do not mean it like it sounds but FYI put perhaps you could=20 overview your way of talking. Beeing the boss does not require beeing harsh. Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 11:55:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9958816A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@irfu.se) Received: from elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (elvira.its.UU.SE [130.238.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF1243D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:55:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuri@irfu.se) Received: by elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 204) id 71B3B565; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:55:03 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from elvira.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by elvira.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s26682; Mon, 8 May 06 13:55:01 +0200 Received: from hq.irfu.se (hq.irfu.se [130.238.30.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1364E499 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:55:01 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from ice.irfu.se (ice.irfu.se [130.238.30.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by hq.irfu.se (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k48BsxjW084091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:54:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from yuri@irfu.se) From: Yuri Khotyaintsev Organization: Swedish Institute of Space Physics To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:54:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605081354.58807.yuri@irfu.se> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on hq.irfu.se Subject: NFS/TCP problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:55:06 -0000 I have an NSF server and several clients which write large text files to th= e=20 server. All machines are running max one week old STABLE and are connected = to=20 the same gigabit switch, and have identical nics (em). Amd mount options ar= e: /defaults =20 type:=3Dnfs;cache:=3Dall;opts:=3Drw,intr,nosuid,grpid,nfsv3,tcp,resvport,so= ft Almost all the time I get the following messages on the server: nfsd send error 32 nfsd send error 32 nfsd send error 32 nfsd send error 32 nfsd send error 32 =2E.. And corresponding messages on a client: impossible packet length (8996061) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (3123011) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (893006905) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (842018868) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (874220) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (14182767) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (16777216) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (758134573) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (1503661568) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (1300840) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa =2E.. And from time to time the files which are written to the server get truncat= ed=20 (regardless of the file size)... Does anybody have an idea how to make it work reliably and not to truncate = the=20 files? =2D-=20 Dr. Yuri Khotyaintsev Institutet f=F6r rymdfysik (IRF), Uppsala From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 12:28:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB4D16A40A for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@mithrandir.com) Received: from laurel.mithrandir.com (squest.ddmg.net [64.45.135.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E42E43D55 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:28:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@mithrandir.com) Received: from [192.168.3.25] (m194-158-94-93.andorpac.ad [194.158.94.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by laurel.mithrandir.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA02A9F for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:28:18 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <372C34B7-18BC-4061-99ED-8321E8109CF7@mithrandir.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-13--867043963; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" From: Scott Harrison Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:29:23 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Best practices for remote upgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 12:28:20 -0000 --Apple-Mail-13--867043963 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed Hello, I have some 4.x servers that I would like to upgrade to 5.x, and = =20 perhaps 6.x. However, I do not have any local access to these =20 machines. I can ssh into them only. I would like to know whether it =20= is possible for me to upgrade the machines with only ssh access, and =20 what one should do to go about upgrading them. TIA, --=20 =C2=B7=F0=90=91=95=F0=90=91=92=F0=90=91=AA=F0=90=91=91 = =C2=B7=F0=90=91=A3=F0=90=91=BA=F0=90=91=A6=F0=90=91=95=F0=90=91=A9=F0=90=91= =AF Scott Harrison --Apple-Mail-13--867043963-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 12:48:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DA516A404 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD10D43D46 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:48:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EE11CC78; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:48:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DANGER (unknown [217.73.23.230]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177F61CC68; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:48:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:48:13 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.14) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1153080475.20060508144813@rulez.sk> To: Scott Harrison In-Reply-To: <372C34B7-18BC-4061-99ED-8321E8109CF7@mithrandir.com> References: <372C34B7-18BC-4061-99ED-8321E8109CF7@mithrandir.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.569 X-Spam-Level: Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practices for remote upgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 12:48:28 -0000 Hi Scott, Monday, May 8, 2006, 2:29:23 PM, you contributed this to our collective wisdom: > Hello, > I have some 4.x servers that I would like to upgrade to 5.x, and > perhaps 6.x. However, I do not have any local access to these > machines. I can ssh into them only. I would like to know whether it > is possible for me to upgrade the machines with only ssh access, and > what one should do to go about upgrading them. Yeah, it's possible (and risky), however you will not get, for example, an advantages of UFS2 and so forth, because you can't upgrade from UFS to UFS2 without rebuilding FS. The problem is that it's not possible to upgrade directly to 6.0/1. You will have to go through process of upgrading to 5.3 first. But I would recommend you to make a backups of your configuration and ask someone who has a physical access to your servers to reinstall them for you. -- Sincerely, Daniel Gerzo From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 14:41:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA83F16A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:41:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5599843D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282AFB826 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:41:43 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-8--859106245; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <5B0866B9-C8C6-4135-9E51-1B61687CDD53@khera.org> From: Vivek Khera Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:41:41 -0400 To: freebsd-stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: ssh: "Connection reset by peer" or "Corrupted MAC on input" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:41:46 -0000 --Apple-Mail-8--859106245 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On May 6, 2006, at 8:23 AM, Michael Gerhards wrote: > What might be the reason for my problems? Is there a problem in the > support for my skc0 device? What could I do to solve my problems? I'll vote bad hardware. That's the only situation under which I got this error. It could be motherboard timing related, or it could be the ethernet card, or it could be the switch itself (though I'd blame the motherboard or NIC first). --Apple-Mail-8--859106245-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 15:48:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF7816A400; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:48:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3782C43D5C; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:48:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from [10.0.0.248] (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k48FmQt3011843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 May 2006 08:48:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Message-ID: <445F684A.1080501@errno.com> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:48:26 -0700 From: Sam Leffler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: JoaoBR References: <445D3C94.10102@errno.com> <200605072146.07500.joao@matik.com.br> <445E9A3D.9090909@errno.com> <200605080845.18125.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <200605080845.18125.joao@matik.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new ath hal (take 2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 15:48:29 -0000 If I had intended stable users to try this code I would have: 1. posted to stable@ 2. provided specific changes for those users (e.g. a patch) You will note my initial post about a new hal was done to both mailing lists. I did not post this hal to stable because I did not want to deal with people complaining that things did not work because they had problems back-patching the necessary changes. I included info in my original post for those folks running current that were going to do it anyway so they could save some time. I replied to your post because all it did was set people up for failures that would result in mail to me that I don't have time to handle. Then those people would either get frustrated by not getting an answer or think there was some problem that wasn't being fixed. I treat the stable src tree VERY carefully. I do not inflict pain on users running stable. I do not arbitrarily commit changes that require people to manually alter their system or otherwise deal with binary incompatibilities. I treat stable as a production code base and only apply changes that are considered well-tested and appropriate to run in a production environment. Sam From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 16:24:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B785216A404 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2992A43D69 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:24:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fd8X5-0002ep-Hj for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 May 2006 18:24:27 +0200 Received: from dialin-145-254-130-250.pools.arcor-ip.net ([145.254.130.250]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 18:24:27 +0200 Received: from HM-Gerhards by dialin-145-254-130-250.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 18:24:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Michael Gerhards Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 18:23:41 +0200 Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <55123.193.138.135.19.1146922482.squirrel@sigma.interami.com> <1pqui3-v11.ln1@hmg.homeunix.net> <445EF61D.3060009@datalinktech.com.au> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-130-250.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: tin/1.8.0-20051224 ("Ronay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/6.0-RELEASE (i386)) Sender: news Subject: Re: problem with sk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 16:24:42 -0000 David Nugent wrote: > >>But by browsing through this list I found the thread "sk0: watchdog timeout" >>and the problem described there is quite similiar to what I get here. So >>perhaps this bug in the sk driver is also the cause for my trouble here?! > > Possibly (and even likely). It sounds like a very severe case of the > same thing. I should add that the system was under quite heavy load doing an "portupgrade". Perhaps that triggered the problem a bit, too. >>Can I somehow use this patch for sk0 _without_ changing everything to >>-current? Acutually, I wanted to stay to 6.1-RELEASE... >> >> > Apparently the timeout problem is fixed in -CURRENT, and will be merged > after 6.1-RELEASE. Enjoy. Sounds good to me. I guess this won't be more than a few days, perhaps 1-2 weeks?! > Tracking -STABLE is a Good Thing, IMHO, quite aside from the security > updates, bugs which don't even affect you right now (but may do > sometime) get fixed, and the -STABLE tag tends to be quite appropriate. I am quite new to FreeBSD and so I am not that familiar with all these things. But I read at some places that -STABLE is not always really stable and should not be used on productive systems. So I thought -RELEASE might be the correct choice for me. But I see your arguments - perhaps I will change my mind and really track -STABLE. > I only ever used -RELEASE media for the initial install. A system I run > at home was originally installed from FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT, also now > running a mid-Feb 6.1-PRERELEASE, upgraded from sources many many times > over (build world+kernel takes just under 3 days). :-) ;-) On my Pentium2-300 I certainly will not upgrade that often... ;-) But on my other machinese (Athlon XP 2600+, Athlon 64 X2 3800+) building world and kernel is not that time-consumpting any more... :-) Michael From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 17:41:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F37F16A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78DA43D49 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F571A3C1B; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BEEEA5164F; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:41:33 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Yuri Khotyaintsev Message-ID: <20060508174133.GA48163@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200605081354.58807.yuri@irfu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605081354.58807.yuri@irfu.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS/TCP problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:41:35 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:54:58PM +0200, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote: > I have an NSF server and several clients which write large text files to = the=20 > server. All machines are running max one week old STABLE and are connecte= d to=20 > the same gigabit switch, and have identical nics (em). Amd mount options = are: > /defaults =20 > type:=3Dnfs;cache:=3Dall;opts:=3Drw,intr,nosuid,grpid,nfsv3,tcp,resvport,= soft >=20 > Almost all the time I get the following messages on the server: >=20 > nfsd send error 32 > nfsd send error 32 > nfsd send error 32 > nfsd send error 32 > nfsd send error 32 > ... >=20 > And corresponding messages on a client: >=20 > impossible packet length (8996061) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > impossible packet length (3123011) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > impossible packet length (893006905) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > impossible packet length (842018868) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > impossible packet length (874220) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > impossible packet length (14182767) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > impossible packet length (16777216) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > impossible packet length (758134573) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > impossible packet length (1503661568) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > impossible packet length (1300840) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > ... >=20 > And from time to time the files which are written to the server get trunc= ated=20 > (regardless of the file size)... >=20 > Does anybody have an idea how to make it work reliably and not to truncat= e the=20 > files? mohan committed a fix for one such problem a few days ago. It will not be in 6.1-RELEASE, but you should be able to apply the patch yourself. It would be nice to know how it works for you. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_socket.c.diff= ?r1=3Dtext&tr1=3D1.136&r2=3Dtext&tr2=3D1.139 Kris --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEX4LNWry0BWjoQKURAtfuAKD9Sv5Povzq/sjB1CDcc33wNDBeFgCgpdPV y10Iy1It3HVEShcAhyapDfY= =gBCP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 20:53:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDABA16A478; Mon, 8 May 2006 20:53:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nik@ngo.org.uk) Received: from jc.ngo.org.uk (jc.ngo.org.uk [69.55.225.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCBD43D45; Mon, 8 May 2006 20:53:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nik@ngo.org.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (i-83-67-27-141.freedom2surf.net [83.67.27.141]) by jc.ngo.org.uk (8.13.4/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k48KrMvF029404; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:53:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nik@ngo.org.uk) Message-ID: <445FAFC2.3020607@ngo.org.uk> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:53:22 +0100 From: Nik Clayton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Willson References: <200605052008.k45K8oLm060421@crimson.hydrus.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200605052008.k45K8oLm060421@crimson.hydrus.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 69.55.225.33 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.x on an IBM T42 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 20:53:26 -0000 Mark Willson wrote: >> I've got an IBM T42 laptop that's currently running 5.4, and it's working >> nicely at the moment. ACPI works well enough that suspend to RAM works >> ('zzz'), the audio works, USB devices are recognised, and the battery life's >> reasonable (with est enabled). >> >> Is anyone aware of any regressions in laptop functionality going from 5.4 to >> 6.x? > > I've been running 6-STABLE on a T42 for a while and not noticed any > problems in the subjects mentioned. The addition of iwi has made life > a little simpler. I think it is ok to take the leap... Thanks. I noticed that the acpi_ibm manual page talks about the suspend-to-disk functionality. Does that work? N From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 20:59:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD6A16A405 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 20:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6076943D5E for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 20:59:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1259337nzi for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 13:59:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iv+Iu12H/zIBjfr+bRZf2snOVxQaeMz7wL3Sw/wmNr8sqHnR0mTQCNEBdqkTAIft+AMNn0llIGjl0dbofpnQuEZD5L1wf0SM+jGVzFVkjn8AB/f9OD+MMaX+TWQgp2VxmDAm76b5VZwBeWL2kG6CQnqWgJKC1LTWrSD37Si03Xc= Received: by 10.36.154.3 with SMTP id b3mr4114517nze; Mon, 08 May 2006 13:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.58.13 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6eb82e0605081359r4f784903g5e996a22d4b479e7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:59:37 -0400 From: "Rong-En Fan" To: "Nik Clayton" In-Reply-To: <445FAFC2.3020607@ngo.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200605052008.k45K8oLm060421@crimson.hydrus.org.uk> <445FAFC2.3020607@ngo.org.uk> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.x on an IBM T42 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 20:59:45 -0000 On 5/8/06, Nik Clayton wrote: > Mark Willson wrote: > >> I've got an IBM T42 laptop that's currently running 5.4, and it's work= ing > >> nicely at the moment. ACPI works well enough that suspend to RAM work= s > >> ('zzz'), the audio works, USB devices are recognised, and the battery = life's > >> reasonable (with est enabled). > >> > >> Is anyone aware of any regressions in laptop functionality going from = 5.4 to > >> 6.x? > > > > I've been running 6-STABLE on a T42 for a while and not noticed any > > problems in the subjects mentioned. The addition of iwi has made life > > a little simpler. I think it is ok to take the leap... > > Thanks. > > I noticed that the acpi_ibm manual page talks about the suspend-to-disk > functionality. > > Does that work? >From my experience on X31, the Fn+F12 (suspend to disk) only works with apm and no acpi. Of course, you have to create a partition first (via phdisk(?) aviliable at ibm's site). Regards, Rong-En Fan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 22:15:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9688716A400 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from isaac.waldron@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F332343D48 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 22:15:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from isaac.waldron@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so1070219nfa for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 15:15:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=oT5sYdgIveMX3lFVk5pZDEjJtBviJfQcfMLM6chMMBBjmheJHUJv4WMuq9UBRHuTyAjt3kpFL2gDp6bqK+YlDgVWmExrZZleMYLizc1qCfy2pqHTjYiwYETX7zm2J7OYvSA2f1C4j49Znxs4pSH8cOkHc7DOWzDk08kX/0TA8mk= Received: by 10.49.35.17 with SMTP id n17mr1557979nfj; Mon, 08 May 2006 15:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.14.3 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 15:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9c16502b0605081515o8f25183r827af1524467d002@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 18:15:57 -0400 From: "Isaac Waldron" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: 6-STABLE with Wine 0.9.12 on ATI X800 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 22:15:59 -0000 Hello, I am running FreeBSD 6-STABLE, built on May 4, with Xorg 6.9 and Wine 0.9.12 from the ports tree. The DRI extensions are installed and working properly for my ATI X800 AIW, as reported by glxinfo: display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: Yes ** snip ** OpenGL vendor string: Tungsten Graphics, Inc. OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 20040924 AGP 8x TCL OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 6.4.1 glxgears gets about 400 FPS or so when maximized, and tuxracer runs fine. However, when I use wine to run graphics applications, it seems to be defaulting to the Mesa Indirect driver, based on realtech VR's glview application: Windows XP Professional 32-bit Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.4.1) Mesa GLX Indirect /usr/local/lib/wine/opengl32.dll.so picks up the right libGL: %ldd /usr/local/lib/wine/opengl32.dll.so /usr/local/lib/wine/opengl32.dll.so: libwine.so.1 =3D3D> /usr/local/lib/libwine.so.1 (0x281f1000) libSM.so.6 =3D3D> /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x2820b000) libICE.so.6 =3D3D> /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x28213000) libXxf86dga.so.1 =3D3D> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86dga.so.1 (0x28229000= ) libXxf86vm.so.1 =3D3D> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86vm.so.1 (0x2822e000) libXext.so.6 =3D3D> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x28233000) libX11.so.6 =3D3D> /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28240000) libGL.so.1 =3D3D> /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x28301000) libGLU.so.1 =3D3D> /usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.so.1 (0x2835d000) libm.so.4 =3D3D> /lib/libm.so.4 (0x283ce000) libc.so.6 =3D3D> /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28077000) libstdc++.so.5 =3D3D> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x283e4000) %pkg_info -W /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 was installed by package xorg-libraries-6.9.0 I checked the configure output for the wine port and it picked up all the OpenGL headers from Mesa, but can't figure out why native applications are getting the DRI renderer while wine is stuck to the indirect renderer. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Isaac -- Isaac Waldron isaac.waldron@gmail.com mobile: 1-508-353-3453 aim: n1yzi From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 23:18:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9E316A401 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:18:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352FE43D45 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:18:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k48NHxvi004286; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:17:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id k48NHxtO004285; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:17:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:17:59 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Scott Harrison Message-ID: <20060508231759.GC545@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Wolfskill , Scott Harrison , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <372C34B7-18BC-4061-99ED-8321E8109CF7@mithrandir.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <372C34B7-18BC-4061-99ED-8321E8109CF7@mithrandir.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practices for remote upgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 23:18:00 -0000 On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Scott Harrison wrote: > Hello, > > I have some 4.x servers that I would like to upgrade to 5.x, and > perhaps 6.x. However, I do not have any local access to these > machines. I can ssh into them only. I would like to know whether it > is possible for me to upgrade the machines with only ssh access, and > what one should do to go about upgrading them. Short answer: it depends. One of the ings on which this depends is how those remote systems are set up. One thing I like to do, which IMO makes this type of exercise somewhat more feasible, is to have more than one bootable slice on the machine. Typically, I would allocate a relatively small slice 1 (& slice 2), each of which would have a / and /usr file system on it. I'd put everything else -- stuff that I wanted to remain the same regardless of which slice is the boot slice -- on (say) slice 3. I then have little shell scripts to use "dump | restore" to "clone" the file systems from one slice to the other. One of the nice things this does is allow the machine to be booted form one slice while moderately major "surgery" is performed on the file systems on the inactive slice. There are a few inconveniences -- it does take up disk space; allocating the root file system for slice 2 is moderately annoying using sysinstall, because it gets allocated as partition d, and I like to make it partition "a" -- so use "bsdlabel -e" (or "disklabel -e" on older systems) and change the partition designator, if that's what you prefer. I've seen similar setups where the inactive slice gradually become more and more stale. I avoid this by using the following approach (which could undoubtedly be made cleverer, but I stopped when I found an approach that worked): * "Clone" the file systems from the active slice to the inactive one. * Reboot from the "other" slice (the target of the above operation). * Upgrade in place. * Reboot (without changing active slice). For fallback, reboot from the original slice. This is actaully a variant of an approach that I recall using back on IBM mainframes running MVS (and MVS/ESA and MVS/XA) (ca. 1982 - 1993). Note that "boot0cfg" can change the default boot slice if you're using the FreeBSD boot loader. In my experience, this works better for smaller deltas between upgrades -- so it may not be directly applicable to a 4.x -> 5.x? -> 6.x transition. There may still be something useful for your situation there, though. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Spam received via "opt-out" lists is still spam, and should be treated as such. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 01:03:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8F116A405 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:03:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from mail13.worldispnetwork.com (mail13.worldispnetwork.com [66.160.178.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 925F943D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:03:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: (qmail 61455 invoked by uid 399); 9 May 2006 01:03:03 -0000 Received: from client-201.240.247.95.speedy.net.pe (HELO ?192.168.1.34?) (alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com@201.240.247.95) by mail13.worldispnetwork.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 01:03:03 -0000 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 20:00:38 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Subject: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 01:03:08 -0000 I can't install freebsd 6.0 STABLE amd64 on my notebook: HP Pavilion 2420la AMD Turion ML 32 , 1024 RAM, 80 GB HD, ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M. I try all modes , default, whitout acpi, safe mode. In all the cases after the next message the installation doesn't work: timecounters tick every 1000 msec Linux ELF exec handler install lo0.bpf attached I installed linux with parameter noapic nolapic, but y want to install and learn freebsd Thank you. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 01:31:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B3716A411 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55C6043D6A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 01:31:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 50096 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 01:31:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OvQqERH5rhj5v2IW6YdT18tn/C+fpyi+0bHMD21dbjLWTTGEFb/D8fJeVnQocHZlOscso+0/Lu7wgf+jm6DaOTUIi7JlmkOIYTUpjHjKxja7lzX90PAtg6o01YwP6gnACciI2MRtnVgr3Ms22c575NxtPGTknnV7RdVuUeYhX88= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 01:31:31 -0000 Message-ID: <445FF104.9030106@rogers.com> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:31:48 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alejandro Ruiz Robles References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> In-Reply-To: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 01:31:36 -0000 Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > I can't install freebsd 6.0 STABLE amd64 on my notebook: > Have you tried 6.1-RC2? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 03:19:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E014B16A462; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4827143D49; Tue, 9 May 2006 03:19:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.21] (rat.samsco.home [192.168.254.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k493JSvZ088457; Mon, 8 May 2006 21:19:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:19:30 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060122 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Content-Type: text/plain; name="6.1-RELEASE.txt.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="6.1-RELEASE.txt.asc" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 03:19:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development of the 6.X branch, delivering several performance improvements, many bugfixes, and a few new features. These include: ~ Addition of a keyboard multiplexer. This allows USB and PS/2 keyboards to coexist without any special options at boot. ~ Many fixes for filesystem stability. High load stress tests are now run successfully on a regular basis as part of the normal FreeBSD QA process. ~ Automatic configuration for man Bluetooth devices, as well as automatic support for running WiFi access points. ~ Addition of drivers for new ethernet and SAS and SATA RAID controllers. ~ BIND updated to 9.3.2 ~ sendmail updated to 8.13.6 NOTE: It was discovered at the last minute that the errata notes that were packaged with the release are out of date. For a complete list of known problems, please see the online errata list, available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.1R/errata.html For more information about FreeBSD release engineering activities, please see: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releng Availability ------------- FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE supports the i386, pc98, alpha, sparc64, amd64, powerpc, and ia64 architectures and can be installed directly over the net using bootable media or copied to a local NFS/FTP server. Distributions for all architectures are available now. Please continue to support the FreeBSD Project by purchasing media from one of our supporting vendors. The following companies will be offering FreeBSD 6.1 based products: ~ FreeBSD Mall, Inc. http://www.freebsdmall.com/ ~ Daemonnews, Inc. http://www.bsdmall.com/freebsd1.html If you can't afford FreeBSD on media, are impatient, or just want to use it for evangelism purposes, then by all means download the ISO images. We can't promise that all the mirror sites will carry the larger ISO images, but they will at least be available from the following sites. MD5 and SHA256 checksums for the release images are included at the bottom of this message. Bittorrent ---------- The FreeBSD project encourages the use of BitTorrent for distributing the release ISO images. A collection of torrent files to download the images is available at http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/ FTP --- At the time of this announcement the following FTP sites have FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE available. ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp2.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp3.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp5.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp.at.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp2.ch.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp.cz.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp.ee.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp.fi.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp.fr.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp2.ie.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp.is.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp1.ru.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp.se.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp.si.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp2.tw.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp2.uk.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp2.us.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ ftp://ftp5.us.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ FreeBSD is also available via anonymous FTP from mirror sites in the following countries: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Korea, Lithuania, Amylonia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. Before trying the central FTP site, please check your regional mirror(s) first by going to: ftp://ftp..FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD Any additional mirror sites will be labeled ftp2, ftp3 and so on. More information about FreeBSD mirror sites can be found at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors-ftp.html For instructions on installing FreeBSD, please see Chapter 2 of The FreeBSD Handbook. It provides a complete installation walk-through for users new to FreeBSD, and can be found online at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html Acknowledgments ---------------- Many companies donated equipment, network access, or man-hours to finance the release engineering activities for FreeBSD 6.1 including The FreeBSD Foundation, FreeBSD Systems, Hewlett-Packard, Yahoo!, Sentex Communications, and Copan Systems. The release engineering team for 6.1-RELEASE includes: Scott Long Release Engineering, Ken Smith I386, AMD64, Sparc64 Release Building, Mirror Site Coordination Robert Watson Release Engineering, Security Doug White Release Engineering Maxime Henrion Release Engineering Hiroki Sato Release Engineering, Documentation Murray Stokely Release Engineering Marcel Moolenaar IA64 Release Building Takahashi Yoshihiro PC98 Release Building Wilko Bulte Alpha Release Building Kris Kennaway Package Building Joe Marcus Clark Package Building Kiril Ponomarew Package Building Colin Percival Security Officer CD Image Checksums ------------------ MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-amd64-bootonly.iso) = b73e8dc202f64aa56606f6e3399bc83f MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso) = 2d6fc98a4cd11468f62ea0c7332affff MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc2.iso) = 6b48c41b5dc774ae727f3f0a8a91c96f MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso) = 11bb7fb4d2a781238008945f6bf65a4e MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso) = cf1ce4ba48d664ce3977108a18ced6b8 MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso) = bc0f4a32a64e00c7cbfb839e6d5772f3 MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-ia64-bootonly.iso) = 94e83e6ba0281b58bd5af4a1004f8079 MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-ia64-disc1.iso) = b3f957ef581f4267fdd2b0400ff492dd MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-ia64-disc2.iso) = e46c08dd1e46c825048ce5105497f900 MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-ia64-livefs.iso) = 75f70e7c1f5bc295bc00841b19c00b63 MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-pc98-disc1.iso) = 923e86a2307d1dce7dfb3379a67885f4 MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-sparc64-bootonly.iso) = f8e11c6a952f4be8435dc8d56c5bfc8e MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-sparc64-disc1.iso) = c206054f9cecf629211f6fc2b068e9ff MD5 (6.1-RELEASE-sparc64-disc2.iso) = b7b4db45c998f682ba57fef62f2b8fdc SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-amd64-bootonly.iso) = da885951bfa1b322bad9780766338e9b22f8b1e71c59316c0f182e27522409a9 SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso) = 99f596f65f7860f2f7d1be7b926faab7c3a3561d8659527127ca39760afb0e00 SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc2.iso) = 4359419420b459a256b2d45ee8d5ba4e13373f9a986ceeadfe6778448d72b01d SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso) = cb7ad11198358e2123dc139d7fbab26727524e973c6c02906cc6aca944b064c9 SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso) = cbc6f9389c85f3130baff5270316ece18d5e324e82f8aa167c61ab49174dd4d1 SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso) = 7c3a056d18be9e2dccf1f4e7dba22a4760d6288165eb87fe9894abc8c7741ffb SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-ia64-bootonly.iso) = 2d1f921f9195f5f1525b437f3bee67e0c02bbfa195a8f9950fba4d471434e837 SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-ia64-disc1.iso) = 584870eed63617f27a0fc5dc908195504e69f35125d7cf6ef9e6752d14f85c59 SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-ia64-disc2.iso) = 6076b7c988625cc044c75e3e580542b23ec0acdac3472d61944736731bc263fe SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-ia64-livefs.iso) = 6fbdd5f0dc63743e05ff11a688aa6a5de2dcb34a469874c85dd3797de99e97ce SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-pc98-disc1.iso) = 859d6978f06d9354713fe76b8ea05268650da943fb9a03e05de3c69426ebbee7 SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-sparc64-bootonly.iso) = a700069cdcc2d0df71e7023afdbba2b4e2e2b66c23348ac6386c46f5b2ce798e SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-sparc64-disc1.iso) = a8e8cf6d82cb8bebe3fa85fe8b2f0c5b6eff866e9314611d36194c01c489474d SHA256 (6.1-RELEASE-sparc64-disc2.iso) = 062f5e1d0ec254dbd924ed43f44de6f068646edf459ed0e36b98e2ca3f257774 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYAD2HTr20QF8Xr8RAk3UAKCDmowYU6nU12xTRAYAFMXN9WBo4ACgkgT3 v6mvp0jJ4BkKCd7bslbJu+Q= =17hx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 04:49:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CB016A401; Tue, 9 May 2006 04:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD23143D48; Tue, 9 May 2006 04:49:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.19.131]) ([10.251.19.131]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 08 May 2006 21:49:15 -0700 Message-ID: <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:49:14 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 04:49:18 -0000 Scott Long wrote: >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of >FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development >of the 6.X branch, delivering several performance improvements, many >bugfixes, and a few new features. These include: > >~ Addition of a keyboard multiplexer. This allows USB and PS/2 keyboards > to coexist without any special options at boot. >~ Many fixes for filesystem stability. High load stress tests are now run > successfully on a regular basis as part of the normal FreeBSD QA process. >~ Automatic configuration for man Bluetooth devices, as well as automatic > > > s/man/many > support for running WiFi access points. >~ Addition of drivers for new ethernet and SAS and SATA RAID controllers. >~ BIND updated to 9.3.2 >~ sendmail updated to 8.13.6 > >NOTE: It was discovered at the last minute that the errata notes that were >packaged with the release are out of date. For a complete list of known >problems, please see the online errata list, available at: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.1R/errata.html > > the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 05:00:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C5516A405 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9B3143D67 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 04:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 18181 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 04:59:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4u+eH2pb1LsKRauUprSgtiT92BR26ft/adWVQUJ0ltluVHuHatTmo4eA+iBAEecN6tNSl1mctKKDDGWTY/joAmImeTzLom1eut1tMqS7jxKNa7lgZJvmxmOviV5iE8ldYjibcNNkXJRvSCB4mB7ufZDRc++fgr/GscEHVKAz5cM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 04:59:56 -0000 Message-ID: <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 01:00:14 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 05:00:39 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of >> FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development >> of the 6.X branch, delivering several performance improvements, many >> bugfixes, and a few new features. These include: >> >> ~ Addition of a keyboard multiplexer. This allows USB and PS/2 >> keyboards >> to coexist without any special options at boot. >> ~ Many fixes for filesystem stability. High load stress tests are >> now run >> successfully on a regular basis as part of the normal FreeBSD QA >> process. >> ~ Automatic configuration for man Bluetooth devices, as well as >> automatic >> >> >> > > s/man/many > >> support for running WiFi access points. >> ~ Addition of drivers for new ethernet and SAS and SATA RAID >> controllers. >> ~ BIND updated to 9.3.2 >> ~ sendmail updated to 8.13.6 >> >> NOTE: It was discovered at the last minute that the errata notes that >> were >> packaged with the release are out of date. For a complete list of known >> problems, please see the online errata list, available at: >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.1R/errata.html >> >> > > the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata" Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 05:26:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C26916A403 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F4643D5E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 05:25:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYZ00FB6GEMZVA0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 07:25:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.202.172.162]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0IYZ008E8GEMA8F0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 07:25:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 07:25:33 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH In-reply-to: <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060509072533.0f78a3e2.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd5.5) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 05:26:01 -0000 On Tue, 09 May 2006 01:00:14 -0400 Mike Jakubik wrote: > Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? > Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug. Oh, please. Allow the team a few minutes (at least!) to get the right errata in place before complaining. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 06:35:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311F616A407 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 06:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn@datalinktech.com.au) Received: from mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony4.iinet.net.au (ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony4.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C7143D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 06:35:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidn@datalinktech.com.au) Received: from 203-206-162-119.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO mail.datalinktech.com.au) ([203.206.162.119]) by mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony4.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 09 May 2006 14:34:59 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,104,1146412800"; d="scan'208"; a="728093172:sNHT22754344" Received: from [192.168.4.232] ([192.168.4.232]) by mail.datalinktech.com.au with esmtp; Tue, 09 May 2006 16:34:58 +1000 id 00192A29.44603812.00017CE0 Message-ID: <44603809.1090203@datalinktech.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:34:49 +1000 From: David Nugent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060406 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Gerhards References: <55123.193.138.135.19.1146922482.squirrel@sigma.interami.com> <1pqui3-v11.ln1@hmg.homeunix.net> <445EF61D.3060009@datalinktech.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with sk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 06:35:03 -0000 Michael Gerhards wrote: >>Apparently the timeout problem is fixed in -CURRENT, and will be merged >>after 6.1-RELEASE. Enjoy. >> >> > >Sounds good to me. I guess this won't be more than a few days, perhaps >1-2 weeks?! > > That is up to the committer, but I would imagine so. >>Tracking -STABLE is a Good Thing, IMHO, quite aside from the security >>updates, bugs which don't even affect you right now (but may do >>sometime) get fixed, and the -STABLE tag tends to be quite appropriate. >> >> > >I am quite new to FreeBSD and so I am not that familiar with all these >things. But I read at some places that -STABLE is not always really >stable and should not be used on productive systems. So I thought >-RELEASE might be the correct choice for me. > > Actually, my own experience is that -STABLE is better suited to production systems, but YMMV. I don't think we are talking a big difference in relative stability. Note that I work in an environment where application upgrades are also relatively frequent so upgrading the OS as well requires very little extra effort (and is the only reason at all that production boxes are occasionally rebooted). -RELEASE is a snapshot of -STABLE which may or may not have problems (the whole idea of the release engineering process is reducing such problems if possible without introducing more to hopefully make a release less problematic than any other aribtrary snapshot) and in theory should provide the most stable OS, but the point to note is that -STABLE usually really means stable. There are normally no surprising new features being added and no intrusive changes to the way things work - just security, bug fixes and non-intrusive/optional features and enhancements as the version number increments, and you're tracking (in theory) better maintained code. Exceptions do happen when, for example, a bug is introduced or exposed, but not intentionally. The process of upgrading -stable has rarely caused me any grief at all if the instructions in src/UPDATING are followed. If you *really* need to be more conservative you can be more specific and track RELENG_6_1 so that you track only 6.1-RELEASE and subsequent security fixes but I've rarely done so for very long and don't see any advantage in freezing the OS at a specific version and do see plenty of disadvantages in not automatically getting fixes like the one being discussed here. Again YMMV, it depends a lot on how tolerant you can be of the once in a blue moon glitch that may or may not happen and whether new functionality or fixes brought into the stable branch is useful to you. Regards, David From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 06:46:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3E916A400 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 06:46:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5783B43D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 06:46:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 26957 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 06:46:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=r/Q31z1AhwnfBuJolFTSicTkINao0izYlbG+reAvQeMsw9lxWXrg9dGoRieXNbZG5HVYRfwV5t4LHNEj6Ln2O5mpk5Y/wgxaWyFmfbvw0dkxomj8ZN8uhulXin3Mh+i7kT8qtWYyGuUjfqYEAzX3jv4+kX2B8klS2DqgC8870Rw= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 06:46:05 -0000 Message-ID: <44603AC1.1020301@rogers.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 02:46:25 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Torfinn Ingolfsen References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060509072533.0f78a3e2.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <20060509072533.0f78a3e2.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 06:46:07 -0000 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Tue, 09 May 2006 01:00:14 -0400 > Mike Jakubik wrote: > > >> Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? >> Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug. >> > > Oh, please. > Allow the team a few minutes (at least!) to get the right > errata in place before complaining. Am I anally retentive or what? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 09:29:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47AD16A400; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: from neo.samodelkin.net (samodelkin.net [195.62.0.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F67543D46; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:29:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: by neo.samodelkin.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F401517019; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:29:17 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:29:17 +0700 From: Max Khon To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, David Wolfskill , stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509092917.GB64148@samodelkin.net> References: <20060315205150.GM400@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20060315212713.GC1206@uws1.starlofashions.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060315212713.GC1206@uws1.starlofashions.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: Subject: Re: Recent 6.1-PRE: burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:29:20 -0000 Hi! On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:27:13PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:51:50PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > I'm running: > > > > > > I just tried it again, using a different brand of media, and also got: > > > > localhost(6.1-P)[22] sudo burncd -s max -f /dev/acd0 data 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc1.iso fixate > > Password: > > next writeable LBA 0 > > writing from file 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc1.iso size 454082 KB > > written this track 454082 KB (100%) total 454082 KB > > fixating CD, please wait.. > > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error > > localhost(6.1-P)[23] > > > > There was a fair amount of time -- around 15 - 20 seconds -- between the > > "fixating CD, please wait.." message and the whine, during which there > > was activity involving the CD drive. > > > > Am I doing something stupid here? > > In my case, the CD burns without problem however, I get that error. > Googling found me a few other people with a similar issue. Have you > tried the CD afterwords to see if it works anyway? > > Out of curiosity, is it a Plextor drive, I think everyone who had a > problem was running into it with Plextors. > > Some people, like myself, only get the annoying error message and > everything is fine, others find that it doesn't work at all. It does not work on many other drives (including mine, I have NEC DVD RW ND-3520A/1.04). I have to fixate manually after the failure. cdrecord (over SCSI emulation) works fine. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/73559 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/95344 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/95979 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=i386/90839 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/63319 /fjoe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 09:29:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47AD16A400; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: from neo.samodelkin.net (samodelkin.net [195.62.0.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F67543D46; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:29:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: by neo.samodelkin.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F401517019; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:29:17 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:29:17 +0700 From: Max Khon To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, David Wolfskill , stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509092917.GB64148@samodelkin.net> References: <20060315205150.GM400@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20060315212713.GC1206@uws1.starlofashions.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060315212713.GC1206@uws1.starlofashions.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: Subject: Re: Recent 6.1-PRE: burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:29:20 -0000 Hi! On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:27:13PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:51:50PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > I'm running: > > > > > > I just tried it again, using a different brand of media, and also got: > > > > localhost(6.1-P)[22] sudo burncd -s max -f /dev/acd0 data 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc1.iso fixate > > Password: > > next writeable LBA 0 > > writing from file 6.1-BETA4-i386-disc1.iso size 454082 KB > > written this track 454082 KB (100%) total 454082 KB > > fixating CD, please wait.. > > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error > > localhost(6.1-P)[23] > > > > There was a fair amount of time -- around 15 - 20 seconds -- between the > > "fixating CD, please wait.." message and the whine, during which there > > was activity involving the CD drive. > > > > Am I doing something stupid here? > > In my case, the CD burns without problem however, I get that error. > Googling found me a few other people with a similar issue. Have you > tried the CD afterwords to see if it works anyway? > > Out of curiosity, is it a Plextor drive, I think everyone who had a > problem was running into it with Plextors. > > Some people, like myself, only get the annoying error message and > everything is fine, others find that it doesn't work at all. It does not work on many other drives (including mine, I have NEC DVD RW ND-3520A/1.04). I have to fixate manually after the failure. cdrecord (over SCSI emulation) works fine. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/73559 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/95344 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/95979 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=i386/90839 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/63319 /fjoe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 10:56:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CA516A404 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hans@lambermont.dyndns.org) Received: from lambermont.dyndns.org (lambermont.dyndns.org [82.93.47.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F5943D53 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:56:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hans@lambermont.dyndns.org) Received: by lambermont.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 58E4D22DDD3; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:56:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:56:09 +0200 To: David Wolfskill , Scott Harrison , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509105609.GC66029@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> References: <372C34B7-18BC-4061-99ED-8321E8109CF7@mithrandir.com> <20060508231759.GC545@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060508231759.GC545@bunrab.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: hans@lambermont.dyndns.org (Hans Lambermont) Cc: Subject: Re: Best practices for remote upgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:56:11 -0000 David Wolfskill wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Scott Harrison wrote: >> I have some 4.x servers that I would like to upgrade to 5.x, and >> perhaps 6.x. However, I do not have any local access to these >> machines. I can ssh into them only. I would like to know whether it >> is possible for me to upgrade the machines with only ssh access, and >> what one should do to go about upgrading them. ... > I then have little shell scripts to use "dump | restore" to "clone" the > file systems from one slice to the other. ... > * Reboot from the "other" slice (the target of the above operation). > * Upgrade in place. > * Reboot (without changing active slice). I do almost the same; I do not reboot to the other slice to upgrade it, instead I use the current slice to upgrade, and if that fails reboot to the other slice (the backup slice). It's the same idea, with one less reboot. This dual-boot-slice (or disk :) setup also allows for the UFS->UFS2 transition. regards, Hans Lambermont From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:19:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E173C16A403; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: from neo.samodelkin.net (samodelkin.net [195.62.0.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5560843D58; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:19:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: by neo.samodelkin.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A6B6417019; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:19:24 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:19:24 +0700 From: Max Khon To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20060509111924.GD64148@samodelkin.net> References: <27148.1144030940@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060402232832.M947@ganymede.hub.org> <20060402234459.Y947@ganymede.hub.org> <27417.1144033691@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060403164139.D36756@fledge.watson.org> <14654.1144082224@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060403194251.GF4474@ns.snowman.net> <20060403233540.D76562@fledge.watson.org> <20060403225145.GI4474@ns.snowman.net> <20060403235222.W76562@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060403235222.W76562@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: Stephen Frost , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, "Marc G. Fournier" , Kris Kennaway , Tom Lane Subject: Re: [HACKERS] semaphore usage "port based"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:19:27 -0000 Hi! On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:56:13PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > >>This is why it's disabled by default, and the jail documentation > >>specifically advises of this possibility. Excerpt below. > > > >Ah, I see, glad to see it's accurately documented. > > As it has been for the last five years, I believe since introduction of the > setting to allow System V IPC to be used with documented limitations. > > >Given the rather significant use of shared memory by Postgres it seems to > >me that jail'ing it under FBSD is unlikely to get you the kind of > >isolation between instances that you want (the assumption being that you > >want to avoid the possibility of a user under one jail impacting a user in > >another jail). As such, I'd suggest finding something else if you truely > >need that isolation for Postgres or dropping the jails entirely. > > > >Running the Postgres instances under different uids (as you'd probably > >expect to do anyway if not using the jails) is probably the right > >approach. Doing that and using jails would probably work, just don't > >delude yourself into thinking that you're safe from a malicious user in > >one jail. > > Yes, there seems to be an awful lot of noise being made about the fact that > the system does, in fact, work exactly as documented, and that the > configuration being complained about is one that is specifically documented > as being unsupported and undesirable. > > As commented elsewhere in this thread, currently, there is no > virtualization support for System V IPC in the FreeBSD Jail implementation. > That may change if/when someone implements it. Until it's implemented, it > isn't going to be there, and the system won't behave as though it's there > no matter how much jumping up and down is done. sysvipc has been implemented once, but it has been decided that it adds unnecessary bloat. That's sad. /fjoe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 11:20:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3F416A412 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:20:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott@mithrandir.com) Received: from laurel.mithrandir.com (squest.ddmg.net [64.45.135.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD3743D69 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:20:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@mithrandir.com) Received: from [192.168.3.25] (m194-158-94-93.andorpac.ad [194.158.94.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by laurel.mithrandir.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9549540; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:20:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20060509105609.GC66029@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> References: <372C34B7-18BC-4061-99ED-8321E8109CF7@mithrandir.com> <20060508231759.GC545@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20060509105609.GC66029@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-10--784845093; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Scott Harrison Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:19:22 +0200 To: Hans Lambermont X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practices for remote upgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:20:52 -0000 --Apple-Mail-10--784845093 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed On May 9, 2006, at 12:56 , Hans Lambermont wrote: > David Wolfskill wrote: > >> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Scott Harrison wrote: >>> I have some 4.x servers that I would like to upgrade to 5.x, and >>> perhaps 6.x. However, I do not have any local access to these >>> machines. I can ssh into them only. I would like to know =20 >>> whether it >>> is possible for me to upgrade the machines with only ssh access, and >>> what one should do to go about upgrading them. > ... >> I then have little shell scripts to use "dump | restore" to =20 >> "clone" the >> file systems from one slice to the other. > ... >> * Reboot from the "other" slice (the target of the above operation). >> * Upgrade in place. >> * Reboot (without changing active slice). > > I do almost the same; I do not reboot to the other slice to upgrade =20= > it, > instead I use the current slice to upgrade, and if that fails =20 > reboot to > the other slice (the backup slice). It's the same idea, with one less > reboot. > > This dual-boot-slice (or disk :) setup also allows for the UFS->UFS2 > transition. > This sounds nice except that I do not have my disk already =20 partitioned like this. Can I take a 4.7 machine (for example) and =20 live repartition it to be like this? --=20 =C2=B7=F0=90=91=95=F0=90=91=92=F0=90=91=AA=F0=90=91=91 = =C2=B7=F0=90=91=A3=F0=90=91=BA=F0=90=91=A6=F0=90=91=95=F0=90=91=A9=F0=90=91= =AF Scott Harrison --Apple-Mail-10--784845093-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 13:34:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D43516A400 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from smtp01.udep.edu.pe (smtp01.udep.edu.pe [200.48.235.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123C643D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from [172.30.30.175] ([200.48.235.53]) by upiura1.udep.edu.pe (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k49DXHCr023227; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:33:21 -0500 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 08:33:52 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <445FF104.9030106@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <445FF104.9030106@rogers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605090833.53182.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Cc: Mike Jakubik Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:34:19 -0000 No, but i will install 6.1 STABLE thank you El Lunes, 8 de Mayo de 2006 20:31, Mike Jakubik escribi=F3: > Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > I can't install freebsd 6.0 STABLE amd64 on my notebook: > > Have you tried 6.1-RC2? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 13:36:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A330A16A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: from mail.mediamatters.org (mail.mediamatters.org [63.240.197.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A9E43D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:36:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: by mail.mediamatters.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id D1EEA96C17E; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:36:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 68.49.189.193 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ski) by mail.mediamatters.org with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:36:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2107.68.49.189.193.1147181773.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:36:13 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian Szymanski" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:36:22 -0000 Hi... I saw this in the 6.1 release notes and eagerly upgraded: "The amr(4) driver now supports ioctl(2) requests necessary for Linux LSI MegaRaid tools on FreeBSD's Linux emulation environment." However, when I pulled over a megamgr.bin binary from a linux machine, and try to execute it on my freebsd machine, I get: [root@ozelmo ~/src/megaraid]# ./megamgr.bin ELF binary type "0" not known. bash: ./megamgr.bin: cannot execute binary file Has anyone got this working? What did they need? Any help would be appreciated, as I'm seriously sick of megarc :) Thanks in advance! Relevant bits of dmesg: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Tue May 9 09:01:31 EDT 2006 root@ozelmo.wuhjuhbuh.afraid.org:/usr/obj/usr/src-6.1/sys/OZELMO amr0: mem 0xef000000-0xef00ffff irq 16 at device 13.0 on pci0 amr0: delete logical drives supported by controller amr0: Firmware 713N, BIOS G119, 64MB RAM ... amr0: delete logical drives supported by controller amrd0: on amr0 amrd0: 953656MB (1953087488 sectors) RAID 5 (optimal) [root@ozelmo ~/src/megaraid]# kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 5 0xc0400000 504e7c kernel 2 1 0xc4bc2000 1a000 linux.ko Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America ski@mediamatters.org aim: xbrianskix From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 13:40:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC1B16A403 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C22443D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:40:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k49DduGX047530; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:39:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3P/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k49DdtSQ087073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 May 2006 09:39:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20060509093724.12301cb0@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 To: Scott Long , stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:40:01 -0000 At 11:19 PM 08/05/2006, Scott Long wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of >FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development >of the 6.X branch, delivering several performance improvements, many >bugfixes, and a few new features. These include: Congratulations Scott and the RE team! We have a number of 6.1ish boxes (UP and SMP) in production being brutalized with spam and virual analysis and they are working great! ---Mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 13:43:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BAF16A409 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:43:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: from mail.secureworks.net (mail.secureworks.net [65.114.32.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ED4B43D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: (qmail 22562 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 13:43:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.14.135?) (63.239.86.253) by 0 with SMTP; 9 May 2006 13:43:20 -0000 Message-ID: <44609C78.4070902@jellydonut.org> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:43:20 -0400 From: Michael Proto User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060503) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Szymanski References: <2107.68.49.189.193.1147181773.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> In-Reply-To: <2107.68.49.189.193.1147181773.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:43:23 -0000 Brian Szymanski wrote: > Hi... > > I saw this in the 6.1 release notes and eagerly upgraded: > "The amr(4) driver now supports ioctl(2) requests necessary for Linux > LSI MegaRaid tools on FreeBSD's Linux emulation environment." > > However, when I pulled over a megamgr.bin binary from a linux machine, and > try to execute it on my freebsd machine, I get: > [root@ozelmo ~/src/megaraid]# ./megamgr.bin > ELF binary type "0" not known. > bash: ./megamgr.bin: cannot execute binary file > > Has anyone got this working? What did they need? Any help would be > appreciated, as I'm seriously sick of megarc :) > > Thanks in advance! > Since it appears to require Linux emulation, have you tried branding the binary is a Linux ELF with brandelf(1)? -Proto From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:09:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D86716A480 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:09:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643BC43D90 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so1043375wxc for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 07:08:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Z+DU5TBFJ+KMGdDFsiDnWticP8fJ/tl49gVlMV+GM6dDK62HIGiuKcwE02Ehtwi/XI/Z0Amt1yQuL/h2RCFDcAXv6SPC8vJP0qqWY0CD27ItvaeENcs5BKxV98A5jPmP6WGnTJyPoUgFUuLaIVyW+/p9xc7vM7QSjLqpmqcBkkY= Received: by 10.70.54.13 with SMTP id c13mr3917285wxa; Tue, 09 May 2006 07:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.53.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:08:53 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: "Alejandro Ruiz Robles" In-Reply-To: <200605090833.53182.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <445FF104.9030106@rogers.com> <200605090833.53182.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:09:12 -0000 On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > No, but i will install 6.1 STABLE > > thank you > > El Lunes, 8 de Mayo de 2006 20:31, Mike Jakubik escribi=F3: > > Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > > I can't install freebsd 6.0 STABLE amd64 on my notebook: > > > > Have you tried 6.1-RC2? > > As Mike has suggested give FreeBSD/AMD64 6.1-RC2 a try. If you have a problem with the boot loader crashing after it loads /boot/loader.conf from the install CD, just power off and on the system, then when you see the boot loader, repeatedly hit the space bar, until you see that it is loading /boot/kernel/kernel. After this, it will then be able to load the system installer, and allow you to install the system. When the system is installed you'll have no problem booting the system from the harddrive. This is what I had to do on my HP Pavilion dv8xxx (AMD Turion 64 ML-37) Sys= tem. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:15:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D861116A532 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: from mail.mediamatters.org (mail.mediamatters.org [63.240.197.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BA143D6E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:15:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: by mail.mediamatters.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 3195196C362; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 68.49.189.193 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ski) by mail.mediamatters.org with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2296.68.49.189.193.1147184131.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> In-Reply-To: <44609C78.4070902@jellydonut.org> References: <2107.68.49.189.193.1147181773.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> <44609C78.4070902@jellydonut.org> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian Szymanski" To: "Michael Proto" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:15:35 -0000 Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I forgot all about brandelf... Thanks Michael! ... But now that the binary is properly branded, I get a different error: Error opening terminal: xterm. I get the same error for xterm-color, cons25, vt220, and everything else I've tried... (and I know for a fact that TERM=xterm works on my linux machines)... Any ideas? Cheers, Brian > Brian Szymanski wrote: >> Hi... >> >> I saw this in the 6.1 release notes and eagerly upgraded: >> "The amr(4) driver now supports ioctl(2) requests necessary for Linux >> LSI MegaRaid tools on FreeBSD's Linux emulation environment." >> >> However, when I pulled over a megamgr.bin binary from a linux machine, >> and >> try to execute it on my freebsd machine, I get: >> [root@ozelmo ~/src/megaraid]# ./megamgr.bin >> ELF binary type "0" not known. >> bash: ./megamgr.bin: cannot execute binary file >> >> Has anyone got this working? What did they need? Any help would be >> appreciated, as I'm seriously sick of megarc :) >> >> Thanks in advance! >> > > Since it appears to require Linux emulation, have you tried branding the > binary is a Linux ELF with brandelf(1)? > > > -Proto > > Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America ski@mediamatters.org skype: xbrianskix aim: xbrianskix From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:18:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B8A16A56A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DFE43D49 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:18:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so1044997wxc for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 07:18:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=obag+eRcHsOooyqSSh3hCX2OigUwOZZ/I/3BLUA5HWLHO9GnlMF5iejDdfhEGmvfA5uBXgtLg4N4TuG64y9YAXCZM8V+WsPL+Lr986eq8Z2zrZqV6mIlrntBn7P2lGNchfug+OL4/UvpgrYIpmyv1PE/F3PCv0ssH4DVWlrJTzI= Received: by 10.70.94.2 with SMTP id r2mr3931688wxb; Tue, 09 May 2006 07:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.53.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 07:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0605090718v4d15ffedxc4d747e4effcd24b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:18:02 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: "Alejandro Ruiz Robles" In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <445FF104.9030106@rogers.com> <200605090833.53182.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:18:04 -0000 On 5/9/06, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > No, but i will install 6.1 STABLE > > > > thank you > > > > El Lunes, 8 de Mayo de 2006 20:31, Mike Jakubik escribi=F3: > > > Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > > > I can't install freebsd 6.0 STABLE amd64 on my notebook: > > > > > > Have you tried 6.1-RC2? > > > > > As Mike has suggested give FreeBSD/AMD64 6.1-RC2 a try. > Just noticed that 6.1-RELEASE is available, give that a try. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 14:26:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DE216A401 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: from mail.secureworks.net (mail.secureworks.net [65.114.32.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B37143D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 14:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: (qmail 33388 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 14:26:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.14.135?) (63.239.86.253) by 0 with SMTP; 9 May 2006 14:26:07 -0000 Message-ID: <4460A67E.2040807@jellydonut.org> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:26:06 -0400 From: Michael Proto User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060503) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Szymanski References: <2296.68.49.189.193.1147184131.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> In-Reply-To: <2296.68.49.189.193.1147184131.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:26:08 -0000 Brian Szymanski wrote: > Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I > forgot all about brandelf... Thanks Michael! > > ... But now that the binary is properly branded, I get a different error: > Error opening terminal: xterm. > I get the same error for xterm-color, cons25, vt220, and everything else > I've tried... (and I know for a fact that TERM=xterm works on my linux > machines)... Any ideas? I suspect its looking for xterm in your /compat/linux emulation environment. I don't know if there's a linux-xterm port available (I didn't see one), but you *might* be able to get away with hardlinking or copying /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm to /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm (assuming you have linux-XFree86-libs or linux-xorg-libs installed). Perhaps someone better versed in X11 and Linux emulation can answer to this. -Proto From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 15:45:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD6316A5E7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C775343D6E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 15:45:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from srv.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1]) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FdUP3-0006Np-SZ; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:45:37 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdUOx-0008Ak-0R; Tue, 09 May 2006 19:45:31 +0400 To: "Brian Szymanski" References: <2107.68.49.189.193.1147181773.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> <44609C78.4070902@jellydonut.org> <2296.68.49.189.193.1147184131.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:45:31 +0400 In-Reply-To: <2296.68.49.189.193.1147184131.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> (Brian Szymanski's message of "Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <15991540@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michael Proto , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:45:51 -0000 On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: > Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I > forgot all about brandelf... Thanks Michael! > ... But now that the binary is properly branded, I get a different error: > Error opening terminal: xterm. > I get the same error for xterm-color, cons25, vt220, and everything else > I've tried... (and I know for a fact that TERM=xterm works on my linux > machines)... Any ideas? Just load http://www.lsilogic.com/cm/License.do?url=/files/support/rsa/utilities/megamgr/ut_linux_mgr_5.20.zip&prodName=MegaRAID%20SATA%20150-4&subType=Miscellaneous Unzipped it, branded and run ./megamgr.bin as root on _console_. I've got "Failed to open driver node /dev/megadev0" (really I don't have one). BTW on xterm it shows the same message. I use FreeBSD 6.1-RC, emulators/linux_base-fc3 and x11/linux-xorg-libs ports. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 16:30:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F3216A42F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: from mail.mediamatters.org (mail.mediamatters.org [63.240.197.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C20643D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:30:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: by mail.mediamatters.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 746E296C719; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:30:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 68.49.189.193 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ski) by mail.mediamatters.org with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:30:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4070.68.49.189.193.1147192222.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> In-Reply-To: <15991540@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <2107.68.49.189.193.1147181773.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> <44609C78.4070902@jellydonut.org> <2296.68.49.189.193.1147184131.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> <15991540@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:30:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian Szymanski" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Boris Samorodov , Michael Proto Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:30:36 -0000 > On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: > >> Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I >> forgot all about brandelf... Thanks Michael! > >> ... But now that the binary is properly branded, I get a different >> error: >> Error opening terminal: xterm. >> I get the same error for xterm-color, cons25, vt220, and everything else >> I've tried... (and I know for a fact that TERM=xterm works on my linux >> machines)... Any ideas? > > Just load > http://www.lsilogic.com/cm/License.do?url=/files/support/rsa/utilities/megamgr/ut_linux_mgr_5.20.zip&prodName=MegaRAID%20SATA%20150-4&subType=Miscellaneous > Unzipped it, branded and run ./megamgr.bin as root on _console_. I've > got "Failed to open driver node /dev/megadev0" (really I don't have > one). BTW on xterm it shows the same message. Oops - I was lacking a linux compat_linux port... Installed one, (fc3), and now I have the same problem about not finding megadev0, even tho I have an amr... Thanks for everyone's help so far... Any more ideas? Cheers, Brian > > > WBR > -- > Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer > InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru > Telephone & Internet Service Provider > > Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America ski@mediamatters.org aim: xbrianskix From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 16:37:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1477916A7DD for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: from mail.mediamatters.org (mail.mediamatters.org [63.240.197.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D82A43D6A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:37:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: by mail.mediamatters.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id E7A1396C47E; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 68.49.189.193 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ski) by mail.mediamatters.org with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4126.68.49.189.193.1147192663.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> In-Reply-To: <4070.68.49.189.193.1147192222.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> References: <2107.68.49.189.193.1147181773.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> <44609C78.4070902@jellydonut.org> <2296.68.49.189.193.1147184131.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> <15991540@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <4070.68.49.189.193.1147192222.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian Szymanski" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Boris Samorodov , Michael Proto Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:37:57 -0000 PS - mknod c 254 /compat/linux/dev/megadev0 (which is what the device is under linux) doesn't help :( > >> On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: >> >>> Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I >>> forgot all about brandelf... Thanks Michael! >> >>> ... But now that the binary is properly branded, I get a different >>> error: >>> Error opening terminal: xterm. >>> I get the same error for xterm-color, cons25, vt220, and everything >>> else >>> I've tried... (and I know for a fact that TERM=xterm works on my linux >>> machines)... Any ideas? >> >> Just load >> http://www.lsilogic.com/cm/License.do?url=/files/support/rsa/utilities/megamgr/ut_linux_mgr_5.20.zip&prodName=MegaRAID%20SATA%20150-4&subType=Miscellaneous >> Unzipped it, branded and run ./megamgr.bin as root on _console_. I've >> got "Failed to open driver node /dev/megadev0" (really I don't have >> one). BTW on xterm it shows the same message. > > Oops - I was lacking a linux compat_linux port... Installed one, (fc3), > and now I have the same problem about not finding megadev0, even tho I > have an amr... > > Thanks for everyone's help so far... Any more ideas? > > Cheers, > Brian > >> >> >> WBR >> -- >> Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer >> InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru >> Telephone & Internet Service Provider >> >> > > > Brian Szymanski > Software and Systems Developer > Media Matters for America > ski@mediamatters.org > aim: xbrianskix > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 16:55:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C8F16A722 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3D543D53 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:55:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FdVUk-0006UM-9C; Tue, 09 May 2006 20:55:34 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdVUd-0008E3-87; Tue, 09 May 2006 20:55:27 +0400 To: "Brian Szymanski" References: <2107.68.49.189.193.1147181773.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> <44609C78.4070902@jellydonut.org> <2296.68.49.189.193.1147184131.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> <15991540@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <4070.68.49.189.193.1147192222.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> <4126.68.49.189.193.1147192663.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:55:27 +0400 In-Reply-To: <4126.68.49.189.193.1147192663.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> (Brian Szymanski's message of "Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:43 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <17757344@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michael Proto , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:55:37 -0000 On Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:43 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: > PS - mknod c 254 /compat/linux/dev/megadev0 (which is what the device is > under linux) doesn't help :( I't only my imho, use it with care: # cd /dev # ln -s amr0 megadev0 > >> On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:15:31 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: > >> > >>> Oh, duh, it's been so long since I used linux binary emulation that I > >>> forgot all about brandelf... Thanks Michael! > >> > >>> ... But now that the binary is properly branded, I get a different > >>> error: > >>> Error opening terminal: xterm. > >>> I get the same error for xterm-color, cons25, vt220, and everything > >>> else > >>> I've tried... (and I know for a fact that TERM=xterm works on my linux > >>> machines)... Any ideas? > >> > >> Just load > >> http://www.lsilogic.com/cm/License.do?url=/files/support/rsa/utilities/megamgr/ut_linux_mgr_5.20.zip&prodName=MegaRAID%20SATA%20150-4&subType=Miscellaneous > >> Unzipped it, branded and run ./megamgr.bin as root on _console_. I've > >> got "Failed to open driver node /dev/megadev0" (really I don't have > >> one). BTW on xterm it shows the same message. > > > > Oops - I was lacking a linux compat_linux port... Installed one, (fc3), > > and now I have the same problem about not finding megadev0, even tho I > > have an amr... > > > > Thanks for everyone's help so far... Any more ideas? WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:14:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A9316A60E for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from mail13.worldispnetwork.com (mail13.worldispnetwork.com [66.160.178.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DF9143D4C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:14:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: (qmail 60460 invoked by uid 399); 9 May 2006 17:14:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.30.30.175?) (alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com@200.48.235.53) by mail13.worldispnetwork.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 17:14:07 -0000 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:13:55 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> <790a9fff0605090718v4d15ffedxc4d747e4effcd24b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0605090718v4d15ffedxc4d747e4effcd24b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091213.56105.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Cc: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:14:15 -0000 Thank you for your help. I try to do that, but i get the same problem. now the error is: module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 after that the installation is stopped. I try to with 6.1 STABLE and get the same problem. El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 09:18, Scot Hetzel escribi=F3: > On 5/9/06, Scot Hetzel wrote: > > On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > > No, but i will install 6.1 STABLE > > > > > > thank you > > > > > > El Lunes, 8 de Mayo de 2006 20:31, Mike Jakubik escribi=F3: > > > > Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > > > > I can't install freebsd 6.0 STABLE amd64 on my notebook: > > > > > > > > Have you tried 6.1-RC2? > > > > As Mike has suggested give FreeBSD/AMD64 6.1-RC2 a try. > > Just noticed that 6.1-RELEASE is available, give that a try. > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:18:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A22116A49C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: from mail2.ambrisko.com (mail2.ambrisko.com [64.174.51.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5C043D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:18:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: from server2.ambrisko.com (HELO www.ambrisko.com) ([192.168.1.2]) by mail2.ambrisko.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2006 10:17:48 -0700 Received: from ambrisko.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.ambrisko.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k49HIiPq053813; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:18:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: (from ambrisko@localhost) by ambrisko.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k49HIiR5053812; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:18:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko) From: Doug Ambrisko Message-Id: <200605091718.k49HIiR5053812@ambrisko.com> In-Reply-To: <17757344@srv.sem.ipt.ru> To: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:18:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Michael Proto , Brian Szymanski , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:18:46 -0000 Boris Samorodov writes: | On Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:43 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: | > PS - mknod c 254 /compat/linux/dev/megadev0 (which is what the device is | > under linux) doesn't help :( | | I't only my imho, use it with care: | | # cd /dev | # ln -s amr0 megadev0 Nope, it needs to show up in devfs. Making a node manually is going to cause trouble. If there isn't a /dev/megadev0 then you don't have the amr_linux loaded. You can try to kldload but you might have to compile it in static. Doug A. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:24:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD2616A651 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: from mail.mediamatters.org (mail.mediamatters.org [63.240.197.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C5A43D4C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ski@mediamatters.org) Received: by mail.mediamatters.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id A9F8196C78C; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:24:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 68.49.189.193 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ski) by mail.mediamatters.org with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 13:24:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4804.68.49.189.193.1147195482.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> In-Reply-To: <200605091718.k49HIiR5053812@ambrisko.com> References: <17757344@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <200605091718.k49HIiR5053812@ambrisko.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:24:42 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian Szymanski" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Boris Samorodov , Michael Proto Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:24:53 -0000 kldload amr_linux did the trick for me, thanks! Cheers, B > Boris Samorodov writes: > | On Tue, 9 May 2006 12:37:43 -0400 (EDT) Brian Szymanski wrote: > | > PS - mknod c 254 /compat/linux/dev/megadev0 (which is what the device > is > | > under linux) doesn't help :( > | > | I't only my imho, use it with care: > | > | # cd /dev > | # ln -s amr0 megadev0 > > Nope, it needs to show up in devfs. Making a node manually is going > to cause trouble. If there isn't a /dev/megadev0 then you don't > have the amr_linux loaded. You can try to kldload but you might > have to compile it in static. > > Doug A. > > Brian Szymanski Software and Systems Developer Media Matters for America ski@mediamatters.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:30:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B5916A41B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:30:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: from mail2.ambrisko.com (mail2.ambrisko.com [64.174.51.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF3443D6D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:30:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: from server2.ambrisko.com (HELO www.ambrisko.com) ([192.168.1.2]) by mail2.ambrisko.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2006 10:29:44 -0700 Received: from ambrisko.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.ambrisko.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k49HUe7V054472; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:30:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: (from ambrisko@localhost) by ambrisko.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k49HUeZF054471; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:30:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko) From: Doug Ambrisko Message-Id: <200605091730.k49HUeZF054471@ambrisko.com> In-Reply-To: <4804.68.49.189.193.1147195482.squirrel@mail.mediamatters.org> To: Brian Szymanski Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:30:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Boris Samorodov , Michael Proto , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: megamgr on 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:30:44 -0000 Brian Szymanski writes: | kldload amr_linux did the trick for me, thanks! Good to hear. You might want to look at megarc and megamonitor for Linux. Hopefully, LSI updated megamonitor to fix the share memory leak or it will exit in about 1/2 hour on FreeBSD since we don't allow us much shared memory usage as Linux. It leaks on Linux. It just takes longer to use it all up. Doug A. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:43:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C8816A452 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:43:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from smtp01.udep.edu.pe (smtp01.udep.edu.pe [200.48.235.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045FF43D4C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:43:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from [172.30.30.175] ([200.48.235.53]) by upiura1.udep.edu.pe (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k49HgeG1021503 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 12:42:41 -0500 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:43:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <200605090833.53182.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091243.15906.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:43:36 -0000 Thank for your help, the problem is after to select installation default,=20 whitout acpi or safe mode, in all cases the boot loader crashing after the= =20 next message: in 6.1 stable module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 in 6.0 stable timecounters tick every 1000 msec Linux ELF exec handler install lo0.bpf attached thank you. El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 09:08, Scot Hetzel escribi=F3: > On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > No, but i will install 6.1 STABLE > > > > thank you > > > > El Lunes, 8 de Mayo de 2006 20:31, Mike Jakubik escribi=F3: > > > Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > > > I can't install freebsd 6.0 STABLE amd64 on my notebook: > > > > > > Have you tried 6.1-RC2? > > As Mike has suggested give FreeBSD/AMD64 6.1-RC2 a try. > > If you have a problem with the boot loader crashing after it loads > /boot/loader.conf from the install CD, just power off and on the > system, then when you see the boot loader, repeatedly hit the space > bar, until you see that it is loading /boot/kernel/kernel. After > this, it will then be able to load the system installer, and allow you > to install the system. When the system is installed you'll have no > problem booting the system from the harddrive. > > This is what I had to do on my HP Pavilion dv8xxx (AMD Turion 64 ML-37) > System. > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:47:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DA516A649 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from mail13.worldispnetwork.com (mail13.worldispnetwork.com [66.160.178.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF6B643D83 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:47:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: (qmail 75667 invoked by uid 399); 9 May 2006 17:24:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.30.30.175?) (alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com@200.48.235.53) by mail13.worldispnetwork.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 17:24:16 -0000 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:20:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <200605090833.53182.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091220.28467.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:47:31 -0000 Thank for your help, the problem is after to select installation default,=20 whitout acpi or safe mode, in all cases the boot loader crashing after the= =20 next message: in 6.1 stable module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 in 6.0 stable timecounters tick every 1000 msec Linux ELF exec handler install lo0.bpf attached thank you. El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 09:08, Scot Hetzel escribi=F3: > On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > No, but i will install 6.1 STABLE > > > > thank you > > > > El Lunes, 8 de Mayo de 2006 20:31, Mike Jakubik escribi=F3: > > > Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > > > I can't install freebsd 6.0 STABLE amd64 on my notebook: > > > > > > Have you tried 6.1-RC2? > > As Mike has suggested give FreeBSD/AMD64 6.1-RC2 a try. > > If you have a problem with the boot loader crashing after it loads > /boot/loader.conf from the install CD, just power off and on the > system, then when you see the boot loader, repeatedly hit the space > bar, until you see that it is loading /boot/kernel/kernel. After > this, it will then be able to load the system installer, and allow you > to install the system. When the system is installed you'll have no > problem booting the system from the harddrive. > > This is what I had to do on my HP Pavilion dv8xxx (AMD Turion 64 ML-37) > System. > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:47:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA2D16A5D5 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from mail13.worldispnetwork.com (mail13.worldispnetwork.com [66.160.178.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A90343D60 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:47:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: (qmail 193 invoked by uid 399); 9 May 2006 17:38:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.30.30.175?) (alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com@200.48.235.53) by mail13.worldispnetwork.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 17:38:25 -0000 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:20:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <200605090833.53182.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091220.28467.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:47:40 -0000 Thank for your help, the problem is after to select installation default,=20 whitout acpi or safe mode, in all cases the boot loader crashing after the= =20 next message: in 6.1 stable module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 in 6.0 stable timecounters tick every 1000 msec Linux ELF exec handler install lo0.bpf attached thank you. El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 09:08, Scot Hetzel escribi=F3: > On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > No, but i will install 6.1 STABLE > > > > thank you > > > > El Lunes, 8 de Mayo de 2006 20:31, Mike Jakubik escribi=F3: > > > Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > > > I can't install freebsd 6.0 STABLE amd64 on my notebook: > > > > > > Have you tried 6.1-RC2? > > As Mike has suggested give FreeBSD/AMD64 6.1-RC2 a try. > > If you have a problem with the boot loader crashing after it loads > /boot/loader.conf from the install CD, just power off and on the > system, then when you see the boot loader, repeatedly hit the space > bar, until you see that it is loading /boot/kernel/kernel. After > this, it will then be able to load the system installer, and allow you > to install the system. When the system is installed you'll have no > problem booting the system from the harddrive. > > This is what I had to do on my HP Pavilion dv8xxx (AMD Turion 64 ML-37) > System. > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 17:53:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED50316A6A0 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B38343D8D for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:52:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so1083930wxc for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:52:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JxaZirbR7vLOujM1b+hcZi3Y34qY3/abPFu1lMl7O/NJObS27CRE/tJiaEaNbP+9OEkuNv30LF+u5JFKLTVqfACHSRJ8yg8XSTOhvx79miUgbMxaQ7g6B9mrBLLC6TghBdpqZBXhzBopBLyp9e1YGKJR/rkhtSkMsR9ttbPF1xA= Received: by 10.70.69.19 with SMTP id r19mr4245011wxa; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.53.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0605091052w205f75acq629e0191672223c7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:52:12 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: "Alejandro Ruiz Robles" In-Reply-To: <200605091213.56105.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> <790a9fff0605090718v4d15ffedxc4d747e4effcd24b@mail.gmail.com> <200605091213.56105.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:53:52 -0000 On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > Thank you for your help. > > I try to do that, but i get the same problem. > > now the error is: > > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 > > after that the installation is stopped. I get this same error when I boot either a GENERIC kernel on my installed system, or from the FreeBSD/amd64 6.1-RELEASE CD. The CD does continue into the System Installation. > > I try to with 6.1 STABLE and get the same problem. When the boot loader comes up, try selecting the option to boot without acpi and see if that will allow the installation to proceed. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 18:09:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0550816A8BF for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA1A43D5A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:09:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so1086907wxc for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 11:09:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AW6eVsxpTOq/6VjwfVW7yll0GwIjDIt2dgKe0i6La/gSKQ/Ns0mC6wTTqz3JGLGj/0qIwaj2g8G7/I8MORzckKtscRPH4zxB4ICRsSNQK6rAr/v/CSEvoYPIesfhNSquAF5v9iUsHXT1fp1ZeBsuI7XOJGltQH2U1OWfyQcftYk= Received: by 10.70.112.13 with SMTP id k13mr4277832wxc; Tue, 09 May 2006 11:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.53.10 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0605091109w7f9db50el2c92ac5ae577f672@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:09:25 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: "Alejandro Ruiz Robles" In-Reply-To: <200605091220.28467.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <200605090833.53182.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605090708l447d9ddfq15026f068b9a1c93@mail.gmail.com> <200605091220.28467.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 18:09:47 -0000 On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > Thank for your help, the problem is after to select installation default, > whitout acpi or safe mode, in all cases the boot loader crashing after th= e > next message: > > in 6.1 stable > > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 > Actually, this is from the kernel, not the boot loader. Is the system hung at this point or is there any other information displayed after this gets printed? As this information would help the developers determine whats going wrong on your system. If there is additional information, a backtrace (bt) from the debugger prompt would be useful. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:00:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520E016A47B for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65CEE43D4C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:00:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 35632 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 19:00:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LrPLoThFP9BKX8z/+3f7HfsPGRxojTq/F3stwkn+qmok8vI5t2TyrJYE9yjDVEx3YmDVmscy9n3B7+Zp6A1joQEt5pqy5ZuITAqEQC1giEPPUrMfV+tCiPyzjut4x00FdV0e0gi1KaVyFx7IPBu4V1Ne/rURabtLG+97gNN/H1U= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 19:00:08 -0000 Message-ID: <4460E6D1.1030803@rogers.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:00:33 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Can't compile without COMPAT_43 on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:00:12 -0000 I can compile an amd64 kernel just fine without the option COMPAT_43, but not i386. Why is this? /usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c:36:2: #error "Unable to compile Linux-emulator due to missing COMPAT_43 option!" mkdep: compile failed I don't want or need the Linux-emulator. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:01:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3704916A5E1 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFFD43D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:01:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k49J12Bk074390 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:01:02 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:01:02 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060509222157.I69331@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 09 May 2006 23:01:02 +0400 (MSD) Cc: Subject: 6.1-R/amd64: PXE boot can't handle .gz mfsroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:01:05 -0000 Colleagues, ${SUBJ} says almost all. PXEboot leads to Can't work out which disk we are booting from. error. Ungzipping /boot/mfsroot.gz helps Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:15:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72FC16A7AD for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A28843D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:15:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-242.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.242]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2C94CA89; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:26:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2225285A; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:14:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4460EA4A.3060208@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:15:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky References: <20060509222157.I69331@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060509222157.I69331@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-R/amd64: PXE boot can't handle .gz mfsroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:15:31 -0000 Dmitry Morozovsky schrieb: > Colleagues, > > ${SUBJ} says almost all. PXEboot leads to > > Can't work out which disk we are booting from. > > error. > > Ungzipping /boot/mfsroot.gz helps Hello Dmitry, I can't report any problems regarding this with 6.0-RELEASE. Can you show me find /tftproot -type f and cat /tftpdroot/boot/loader.conf please? Did you compiled pxeboot without gzip support accidentally? Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:19:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031DA16A41A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F7843D81 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k49JIlmA074548; Tue, 9 May 2006 23:18:47 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:18:47 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= In-Reply-To: <4460EA4A.3060208@cs.tu-berlin.de> Message-ID: <20060509231647.S69331@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060509222157.I69331@woozle.rinet.ru> <4460EA4A.3060208@cs.tu-berlin.de> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 09 May 2006 23:18:47 +0400 (MSD) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-R/amd64: PXE boot can't handle .gz mfsroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:19:02 -0000 On Tue, 9 May 2006, Bj?rn K?nig wrote: BK> > ${SUBJ} says almost all. PXEboot leads to BK> > Can't work out which disk we are booting from. BK> > BK> > error. BK> > BK> > Ungzipping /boot/mfsroot.gz helps BK> BK> Hello Dmitry, BK> BK> I can't report any problems regarding this with 6.0-RELEASE. Can you show me BK> BK> find /tftproot -type f pxeboot only BK> cat /tftpdroot/boot/loader.conf none BK> Did you compiled pxeboot without gzip support accidentally? No, I did mount release ISO via md as NFS root for given machine: host gwp { hardware ethernet 00:16:35:***; filename "pxeboot"; option root-path "192.168.200.1:/pxe/amd64/6.1-R/"; option routers 192.168.200.1; } Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:37:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B3D16A487 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@jasons.us) Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818C143D62 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:37:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@jasons.us) Received: from mail1.jasons.us ([141.157.27.177]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0IZ000HADJTJAWW5@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:37:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:36:55 -0400 (EDT) From: jason X-X-Sender: jason@mail1.jasons.us To: stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060509152734.N54136@mail1.jasons.us> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed User-Agent: Pine/4.63 (Not Windows) Cc: Subject: imap w/cleartext on 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jason List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:37:04 -0000 I'm trying to get imap-uw built on 5.4-RELEASE so that it wil allow plaintext logins. (All connections will be from localhost so I'm not concerned with SSL) But it doesn't want to behave itself. I've tried building it this way: # cd /usr/ports/mail/imap-uw # make -DWITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT and it complains that I'm buildling it with plaintext enabled, as it should: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Building in PARTIAL compliance with RFC 3501 security + requirements: + Compliant: ++ TLS/SSL encryption is supported + Non-compliant: ++ Unencrypted plaintext passwords are permitted + + In order to rectify this problem, you MUST build with: ++ SSLTYPE=unix.nopwd +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ but when I install it then telnet there I get: # !telnet telnet 0 143 Trying 0.0.0.0... Connected to 0. Escape character is '^]'. * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS STARTTLS LOGINDISABLED] mail1.jasons.us IMAP4rev1 2004.357 at Tue, 9 May 2006 15:25:26 -0400 (EDT) So somewhere it's still not allowing cleartext log-ins. Any ideas? Alternatively I'd be glad to get squirelmail working with encryption but that doesn't want to work either. Suggestions welcome for either problem. -- -Jason ----- --- There are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS I'm very probably wrong. --- "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:41:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58FE16A554 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05E7943D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:41:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 945 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 19:41:55 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=45pPTxfSs8gYGwf+Vw+OR1wfUDQ1duWHq4euaPYkdA+QDHboD2Ll/A1/nqvmx8MZiZx9LOnGMESMn/98hXsW7IwO2WXJseGWxCm9nsgo7+Iw8iq+W2bTeIUOATqJMIYmWCgIUrf+Lim9q5uxo0jH0QfSU4JBKmbjr841Dtuglxc= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 19:41:55 -0000 Message-ID: <4460F09C.7090706@rogers.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 15:42:20 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jason References: <20060509152734.N54136@mail1.jasons.us> In-Reply-To: <20060509152734.N54136@mail1.jasons.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: imap w/cleartext on 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:41:57 -0000 jason wrote: > > I'm trying to get imap-uw built on 5.4-RELEASE so that it wil allow > plaintext logins. (All connections will be from localhost so I'm not > concerned with SSL) But it doesn't want to behave itself. I've tried > building it this way: This belongs more on the ports mailing list, not stable. I don't know why you have this problem, but i would suggest you use dovecot or courier as an imap server instead. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 20:17:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE5416A446 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from mail.clickfox.com (cffw1.clickfox.com [72.16.213.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FB143D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:16:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) X-PMWin-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __USER_AGENT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY' Thread-Index: AcZzpjIQsCqLx+OnR227gl1zJQUNxw== X-PMWin-Version: 2.5.1s, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antivirus-Engine: 2.32.14 Received: from [10.20.30.156] ([72.16.213.34]) by mail.clickfox.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 9 May 2006 16:21:46 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2663 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal Message-ID: <4460F8B8.1060109@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:16:56 -0400 From: "Jonathan Noack" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mike Jakubik" References: <20060509152734.N54136@mail1.jasons.us> <4460F09C.7090706@rogers.com> In-reply-to: <4460F09C.7090706@rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2006 20:21:46.0444 (UTC) FILETIME=[31D4E8C0:01C673A6] Cc: stable@freebsd.org, jason Subject: Re: imap w/cleartext on 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 20:17:01 -0000 Mike Jakubik wrote: > jason wrote: >> I'm trying to get imap-uw built on 5.4-RELEASE so that it wil allow >> plaintext logins. (All connections will be from localhost so I'm not >> concerned with SSL) But it doesn't want to behave itself. I've tried >> building it this way: > > This belongs more on the ports mailing list, not stable. I don't know > why you have this problem, but i would suggest you use dovecot or > courier as an imap server instead. Not to beat an off-topic horse, but... When I switched from Courier IMAP to Dovecot, I saw a huge increase in performance. Dovecot uses index files that prevent it from having to continually scan a mailbox for every request. For my largest folders (30,000+ messages), Dovecot was *at least* an order of magnitude faster. -Jonathan -- Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 21:07:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C77C16A485 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@jasons.us) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A20543D45 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:07:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@jasons.us) Received: from mail1.jasons.us ([141.157.27.177]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0IZ0009EAO026Z98@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 16:07:15 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT) From: jason In-reply-to: <4460F8B8.1060109@alumni.rice.edu> X-X-Sender: jason@mail1.jasons.us To: stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060509170554.Y54136@mail1.jasons.us> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed References: <20060509152734.N54136@mail1.jasons.us> <4460F09C.7090706@rogers.com> <4460F8B8.1060109@alumni.rice.edu> User-Agent: Pine/4.63 (Not Windows) Cc: Subject: Re: imap w/cleartext on 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jason List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 21:07:16 -0000 On Tue, 9 May 2006, Jonathan Noack wrote: > Not to beat an off-topic horse, but... > > When I switched from Courier IMAP to Dovecot, I saw a huge increase in > performance. Dovecot uses index files that prevent it from having to > continually scan a mailbox for every request. For my largest folders > (30,000+ messages), Dovecot was *at least* an order of magnitude faster. I got it to work right. It turns out that I had to make clean on both cclient and imap-uw, build cclient with "-D WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT", install it and then do the same with imap-uw. Oh, and it helps to spell "PLAINTEXT" correctly. "PLAIMTEXT" doesn't have the same effect. Thanks for the pointer to Dovecot - I'll check it out. Sorry about the mostly-OT chatter. -Jason ----- --- There are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS I'm very probably wrong. --- "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 22:12:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF90316A400 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:12:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from mail13.worldispnetwork.com (mail13.worldispnetwork.com [66.160.178.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D678143D5A for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:12:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: (qmail 68317 invoked by uid 399); 9 May 2006 22:02:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.30.30.175?) (alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com@200.48.235.53) by mail13.worldispnetwork.com with SMTP; 9 May 2006 22:02:01 -0000 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:01:52 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <200605091220.28467.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605091109w7f9db50el2c92ac5ae577f672@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0605091109w7f9db50el2c92ac5ae577f672@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091701.52812.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Cc: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 22:12:06 -0000 6.1 STABLE amd64 The last messages is: Device configuration finished. procfs registered linprocfs registered lapic: Divisior 2, Frecuency 99710124hz Timecounters "TSC" frecuency 1794793456 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 Linux ELF exec handler installed lo0: bpf attached rr232x: no controller detected. Thank you. El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 13:09, Scot Hetzel escribi=F3: > On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > Thank for your help, the problem is after to select installation defaul= t, > > whitout acpi or safe mode, in all cases the boot loader crashing after > > the next message: > > > > in 6.1 stable > > > > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error= 6 > > Actually, this is from the kernel, not the boot loader. Is the system > hung at this point or is there any other information displayed after > this gets printed? As this information would help the developers > determine whats going wrong on your system. > > If there is additional information, a backtrace (bt) from the debugger > prompt would be useful. > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 22:13:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A402116A42F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from smtp01.udep.edu.pe (smtp01.udep.edu.pe [200.48.235.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCF143D8C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:13:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from [172.30.30.175] ([200.48.235.53]) by upiura1.udep.edu.pe (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k49MCK5b009332; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:12:20 -0500 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:12:55 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <200605091220.28467.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605091109w7f9db50el2c92ac5ae577f672@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0605091109w7f9db50el2c92ac5ae577f672@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091712.55316.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 22:13:44 -0000 6.1 STABLE amd64 The last messages is: Device configuration finished. procfs registered linprocfs registered lapic: Divisior 2, Frecuency 99710124hz Timecounters "TSC" frecuency 1794793456 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 Linux ELF exec handler installed lo0: bpf attached rr232x: no controller detected. Thank you. El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 13:09, Scot Hetzel escribi=F3: > On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > Thank for your help, the problem is after to select installation defaul= t, > > whitout acpi or safe mode, in all cases the boot loader crashing after > > the next message: > > > > in 6.1 stable > > > > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error= 6 > > Actually, this is from the kernel, not the boot loader. Is the system > hung at this point or is there any other information displayed after > this gets printed? As this information would help the developers > determine whats going wrong on your system. > > If there is additional information, a backtrace (bt) from the debugger > prompt would be useful. > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 22:20:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E11F16A527; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA2143D45; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:20:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k49MJsU0067984; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:19:54 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:19:46 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <445D3C94.10102@errno.com> <200605080845.18125.joao@matik.com.br> <445F684A.1080501@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <445F684A.1080501@errno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605091919.46565.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new ath hal (take 2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 22:20:09 -0000 On Monday 08 May 2006 12:48, Sam Leffler wrote: > If I had intended stable users to try this code I would have: > > 1. posted to stable@ > 2. provided specific changes for those users (e.g. a patch) > > You will note my initial post about a new hal was done to both mailing > lists. I did not post this hal to stable because I did not want to deal > with people complaining that things did not work because they had > problems back-patching the necessary changes. I included info in my > original post for those folks running current that were going to do it > anyway so they could save some time. > > I replied to your post because all it did was set people up for failures > that would result in mail to me that I don't have time to handle. Then > those people would either get frustrated by not getting an answer or > think there was some problem that wasn't being fixed. > > I treat the stable src tree VERY carefully. I do not inflict pain on > users running stable. I do not arbitrarily commit changes that require > people to manually alter their system or otherwise deal with binary > incompatibilities. I treat stable as a production code base and only > apply changes that are considered well-tested and appropriate to run in > a production environment. > got your point but this is free software and anybody can contribute as well as anybody may= =20 decide what works for him or not and use it then with the same spirit. It i= s=20 oustanding that you are responsible and well organized with your work but= =20 this should not cut others freedom to mix it up for themselfs. Good talk, let's move on and may be you find some time to help me finding o= ut=20 why this damned ath cards sometimes stop rx/tx under load.=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 22:51:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE42116A400 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-5.paradise.net.nz (bm-5a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F8B43D48 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:51:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-5.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IZ000HOXSU7QD@linda-5.paradise.net.nz> for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:51:45 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-231.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.231]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A723D34D2C; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:51:42 +1200 (NZST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:51:39 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <20060506135412.Q91930@carver.gumbysoft.com> To: Doug White Message-id: <44611CFB.6030804@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) References: <445C03E4.80900@paradise.net.nz> <20060506135412.Q91930@carver.gumbysoft.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-RC and the audit group X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 22:51:57 -0000 Doug White wrote: > On Sat, 6 May 2006, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > >> I found that installworld stops, because the 'audit' group has not been >> created. Now I just pressed 'return' for the default actions during >> mergemaster -p, but I didn't notice any mention of the audit group. > > The default action is to do nothing, so its possible you just missed it as > you were blazing through. :-) > Just updated another box to 6.1-STABLE, and yes I did 'return' though it. The reason being mergemaster -p wanted to patch my group file to remove all the additions (i.e, useful groups and group -> user associations) as *well* as add the audit group. Would be possible (or sensible) to 2-stage this sort of thing? i.e: 1/ Add required new groups 2/ Offer to patch 'em back to default. Cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 00:03:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7A716A402 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C174C43D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k4A03IHD015944 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:03:19 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:03:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <445C03E4.80900@paradise.net.nz> <20060506135412.Q91930@carver.gumbysoft.com> <44611CFB.6030804@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <44611CFB.6030804@paradise.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605100203.18911.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: 6.1-RC and the audit group X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:03:23 -0000 Hi Mark, On Wednesday 10 May 2006 00:51, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Doug White wrote: > > On Sat, 6 May 2006, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > >> I found that installworld stops, because the 'audit' group has not been > >> created. Now I just pressed 'return' for the default actions during > >> mergemaster -p, but I didn't notice any mention of the audit group. > > > > The default action is to do nothing, so its possible you just missed it > > as you were blazing through. :-) > > Just updated another box to 6.1-STABLE, and yes I did 'return' though > it. The reason being mergemaster -p wanted to patch my group file to > remove all the additions (i.e, useful groups and group -> user > associations) as *well* as add the audit group. Well unless -p changes mergemaster's behaviour, the general idea is that you press 'm' for merge ( correct me if I'm wrong but I think mergemaster was named after this feature :P ). It will let you add the new audit group _and_ keep the extra groups. > > Would be possible (or sensible) to 2-stage this sort of thing? i.e: > > 1/ Add required new groups > 2/ Offer to patch 'em back to default. > > Cheers > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Regards, Pieter From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 00:43:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A1816A403 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cscotts@mindspring.com) Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D0CD43D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:43:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cscotts@mindspring.com) Received: (qmail 23637 invoked from network); 10 May 2006 00:43:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 10 May 2006 00:43:56 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 68.79.13.249 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) In-Reply-To: <200605100203.18911.pieter@degoeje.nl> References: <445C03E4.80900@paradise.net.nz> <20060506135412.Q91930@carver.gumbysoft.com> <44611CFB.6030804@paradise.net.nz> <200605100203.18911.pieter@degoeje.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <906D3CB1-AAB5-4162-87D6-3F5C118AE6AF@mindspring.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Scott Sipe Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:43:55 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) Subject: Re: 6.1-RC and the audit group X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:43:58 -0000 On May 9, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Pieter de Goeje wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Wednesday 10 May 2006 00:51, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> Doug White wrote: >>> On Sat, 6 May 2006, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >>>> I found that installworld stops, because the 'audit' group has >>>> not been >>>> created. Now I just pressed 'return' for the default actions during >>>> mergemaster -p, but I didn't notice any mention of the audit group. >>> >>> The default action is to do nothing, so its possible you just >>> missed it >>> as you were blazing through. :-) >> >> Just updated another box to 6.1-STABLE, and yes I did 'return' though >> it. The reason being mergemaster -p wanted to patch my group file to >> remove all the additions (i.e, useful groups and group -> user >> associations) as *well* as add the audit group. > > Well unless -p changes mergemaster's behaviour, the general idea is > that you > press 'm' for merge ( correct me if I'm wrong but I think > mergemaster was > named after this feature :P ). It will let you add the new audit > group _and_ > keep the extra groups. I can vouch for this working properly! I just ran mergemaster -p in the process of upgrading, when it gets to the passwd and group file, I press M for merge, and select from l and r (left and right) which side I want to keep. Thus I get the new FreeBSD ID string, the new audit group, and all my old local mods. Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 02:57:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A98A16A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-5.paradise.net.nz (bm-5a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295E643D4C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 02:57:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-5.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IZ1002SQ477G2@linda-5.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:57:07 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-132.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.132]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3384CA41D6; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:57:06 +1200 (NZST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:57:02 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <200605100203.18911.pieter@degoeje.nl> To: Pieter de Goeje Message-id: <4461567E.6050602@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) References: <445C03E4.80900@paradise.net.nz> <20060506135412.Q91930@carver.gumbysoft.com> <44611CFB.6030804@paradise.net.nz> <200605100203.18911.pieter@degoeje.nl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-RC and the audit group X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:57:22 -0000 Pieter de Goeje wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Wednesday 10 May 2006 00:51, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> Just updated another box to 6.1-STABLE, and yes I did 'return' though >> it. The reason being mergemaster -p wanted to patch my group file to >> remove all the additions (i.e, useful groups and group -> user >> associations) as *well* as add the audit group. > > Well unless -p changes mergemaster's behaviour, the general idea is that you > press 'm' for merge ( correct me if I'm wrong but I think mergemaster was > named after this feature :P ). It will let you add the new audit group _and_ > keep the extra groups. > > Thanks all - You are quite right - I'm clearly just being a bit thick... Cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 04:56:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAFD16A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 04:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243C643D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 04:56:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4A4uZXt075330 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:56:35 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:56:35 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060509222157.I69331@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: <20060510084006.J96317@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060509222157.I69331@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 10 May 2006 08:56:35 +0400 (MSD) Cc: Subject: Re: 6.1-R/amd64: PXE boot can't handle .gz mfsroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:56:37 -0000 On Tue, 9 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> Colleagues, DM> DM> ${SUBJ} says almost all. PXEboot leads to DM> DM> Can't work out which disk we are booting from. DM> DM> error. DM> DM> Ungzipping /boot/mfsroot.gz helps This was too early positive. It does not help, as unzipped mfsroot is not actually loaded as filesystem: OK ls / ? boot ? boot.config ? boot.catalog ? cdrom.inf OK lsmod 0x100000: /boot/kernel/kernel (elf kernel, 0x8e4268) modules: linux.1 rr232x.1 io.1 splash.1 agp.1 nfsserver.1 nfslock.1 nfs.1 nfs4.1 wlan.1 if_gif.1 if_faith.1 ether.1 sysvshm.1 sysvsem.1 sysvmsg.1 cd9660.1 isa.1 pseudofs.1 procfs.1 ntfs.1 msdosfs.1 usb.1 cdce.0 random.1 ppbus.1 pci.1 pccard.1 null.1 mpt_raid.1 mpt.1 mpt_cam.1 mpt_core.1 miibus.1 mem.1 isp.1 sbp.1 fwe.1 firewire.1 exca.1 cardbus.1 ast.1 afd.1 acd.1 ataraid.1 atapci.1 ad.1 ata.1 ahc.1 ahd.1 ahd_pci.1 ahc_pci.1 ahc_isa.1 acpi_pci.1 acpi.1 linprocfs.1 cam.1 0x9e4268: /boot/mfsroot (mfs_root, 0x800000) So after loading kernel it complains: init: not found in path /sbin/init:/sbin/oinit:/sbin/init.bak:/rescue/init:/stand/sysinstall panic: no init (while there was line md0: Preloaded image 8388608 bytes at 0xffffffff809e4268 a few lines before...) ... will experiment further... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 05:50:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C5916A403 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C91443D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:50:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-242.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.242]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E812A4CA03; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:02:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FA252859; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:49:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44617F36.5090009@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:50:46 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky References: <20060509222157.I69331@woozle.rinet.ru> <4460EA4A.3060208@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20060509231647.S69331@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060509231647.S69331@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-R/amd64: PXE boot can't handle .gz mfsroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 05:50:45 -0000 Dmitry Morozovsky schrieb: > BK> cat /tftpdroot/boot/loader.conf > > none Then loader.conf of your NFS root. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 05:56:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EC816A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:56:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7187443D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-39-242.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.39.242]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9505A4CA0D; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:07:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE61652859; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:55:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4461807D.1040504@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:56:13 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jakubik References: <4460E6D1.1030803@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <4460E6D1.1030803@rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't compile without COMPAT_43 on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 05:56:09 -0000 Mike Jakubik schrieb: > I can compile an amd64 kernel just fine without the option COMPAT_43, > but not i386. Why is this? > > /usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c:36:2: #error > "Unable to compile Linux-emulator due to missing COMPAT_43 option!" > mkdep: compile failed > > I don't want or need the Linux-emulator. The corresponding module will be built nevertheless. If you want to build only a selection of modules then you have to specify MODULES_OVERRIDE, e.g. makeoptions MODULES_OVERRIDE="acpi" in your kernel configuration file. Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 06:38:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064A816A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAD243D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:38:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4A6cDi9076380; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:38:13 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:38:13 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= In-Reply-To: <44617F36.5090009@cs.tu-berlin.de> Message-ID: <20060510102859.B76011@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060509222157.I69331@woozle.rinet.ru> <4460EA4A.3060208@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20060509231647.S69331@woozle.rinet.ru> <44617F36.5090009@cs.tu-berlin.de> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 10 May 2006 10:38:13 +0400 (MSD) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1-R/amd64: PXE boot can't handle .gz mfsroot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 06:38:17 -0000 On Wed, 10 May 2006, Bj?rn K?nig wrote: BK> > BK> cat /tftpdroot/boot/loader.conf BK> > BK> > none BK> BK> Then loader.conf of your NFS root. It was original from bootonly CD: mfsroot_load="YES" mfsroot_type="mfs_root" mfsroot_name="/boot/mfsroot" Then, I has added console="comconsole" comconsole_speed="115200" to simplify debugging. "Funny. No response" (c) Larry ;-) Moreover, after loading kernel loader unconditionally switches back to vidconsole, so the last lines on serial are /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x5ad998 data=0xc99d8+0x611f8 syms=[0x8+0x91458+0x8+0x7a22e] \ Then on VGA (I don't know which exactly line is printed after that, but I guess right after /boot/kernel/kernel) it writes 'Can't work out which disk we are booting from.' and so on from loader/main.c:extract_currdev() Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 06:39:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454BD16A40B for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A17243D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 06:39:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4A6dstB076396; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:39:54 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:39:54 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= In-Reply-To: <4461807D.1040504@cs.tu-berlin.de> Message-ID: <20060510103918.X76011@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <4460E6D1.1030803@rogers.com> <4461807D.1040504@cs.tu-berlin.de> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 10 May 2006 10:39:54 +0400 (MSD) Cc: Mike Jakubik , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't compile without COMPAT_43 on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 06:39:58 -0000 On Wed, 10 May 2006, Bj?rn K?nig wrote: BK> > I can compile an amd64 kernel just fine without the option COMPAT_43, but BK> > not i386. Why is this? BK> > BK> > /usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../i386/linux/linux_sysvec.c:36:2: #error BK> > "Unable to compile Linux-emulator due to missing COMPAT_43 option!" BK> > mkdep: compile failed BK> > BK> > I don't want or need the Linux-emulator. BK> BK> The corresponding module will be built nevertheless. If you want to build BK> only a selection of modules then you have to specify MODULES_OVERRIDE, e.g. BK> BK> makeoptions MODULES_OVERRIDE="acpi" BK> BK> in your kernel configuration file. It seems WITHOUT_MODULES is more appropriate, as written in make.con example: # The list of modules to never build, applied *after* MODULES_OVERRIDE. #WITHOUT_MODULES= bktr plip Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 07:31:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F8816A420 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from smtp1.uct.ac.za (smtp1.uct.ac.za [137.158.128.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5091743D64 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:31:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from anubis.uct.ac.za ([137.158.128.125]) by smtp1.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1FdjA4-000M1A-5I for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:31:08 +0200 Received: from lhc.phy.uct.ac.za ([137.158.37.93]) by anubis.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdjA3-0008xc-Ub for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:31:07 +0200 Received: from lordcow by lhc.phy.uct.ac.za with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FdjA3-0005Uu-R7 for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:31:07 +0200 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:31:07 +0200 From: gareth To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060510073107.GA19897@lordcow.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 Cc: Subject: portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:31:13 -0000 hey guys, i've been having this trouble on and off for quite awhile, sometimes while running 'portsdb -Uu' (after a cvsup) the box just freezes, along with the power? i'm running 5.3-RELEASE. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 07:44:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7093F16A401 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F78143D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 60167 invoked from network); 10 May 2006 11:44:38 +0400 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 10 May 2006 11:44:38 +0400 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.2.02271, virus records: 119717, updated: 9.04.2006] Message-ID: <006301c67405$954abec0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: References: <20060510073107.GA19897@lordcow.org> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:44:31 +0400 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Cc: Subject: What's done and what's not done in 6.1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:44:41 -0000 see: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html Is it the final status of things when went into 6.1R? I am particulary interested in status of the following problems: devfs locking problem unmount pending error swap_pager warnings pty leak "calcru: runtime went backwards" problem for threaded program update sysinstall disk labeling Regards, Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 10:22:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0AB16A438 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from smtp1.uct.ac.za (smtp1.uct.ac.za [137.158.128.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1366143D53 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:22:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from anubis.uct.ac.za ([137.158.128.125]) by smtp1.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Fdlpl-0006f4-W8 for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:22:21 +0200 Received: from lhc.phy.uct.ac.za ([137.158.37.93]) by anubis.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fdlpl-0009Gq-Kp for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:22:21 +0200 Received: from lordcow by lhc.phy.uct.ac.za with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fdlpm-0006eS-8G for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:22:22 +0200 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:22:22 +0200 From: gareth To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060510102222.GA25464@lordcow.org> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20060510073107.GA19897@lordcow.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060510073107.GA19897@lordcow.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 Cc: Subject: Re: portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:22:34 -0000 On Wed 2006-05-10 (09:31), gareth wrote: > hey guys, i've been having this trouble on and off for > quite awhile, sometimes while running 'portsdb -Uu' > (after a cvsup) the box just freezes, along with the > power? i'm running 5.3-RELEASE. ok, i did: cd /usr/ports rm INDEX* make fetchindex amongst other things, and every time, running 'portsdb -Uu' cripples the machine. i'm not too keen to see where exactly it dies since it'll result in another hard shutdown. but, if i just run portversion, it creates the INDEX-5.db, so i'm not sure why i'm running 'portsdb -Uu' in the first place? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 10:58:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CA716A405 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:58:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spil.oss@googlemail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2405943D4C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spil.oss@googlemail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so1199091wxc for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:58:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=NYVkPF/i1N/b52TNhyjuunJzLhCwq/Kko8nCY0hp1sdtRjADCobZ4pXuuOeZe8qBkFZiHD8BuD5SDex0jdkDe03AM6vz5osUr9yh6G4cUMALxBWq0L7lDz7tsmywFrSZaY4rAqWOStacuDu6YWYlNF928nEJAYKPa6JQ03H+W1k= Received: by 10.70.103.14 with SMTP id a14mr224678wxc; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.37.16 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 03:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5fbf03c20605100358o5c2cab16w4bc34c2e9498e1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:58:49 +0200 From: "Spil Oss" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: buildworld failure in libexec.mail.local on 6.1 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:58:52 -0000 l.s. After running cvsup to RELENG_6_1, I started `make buildworld KERNCONF=3DBEASTIE61` as per the handbook's '21.4.1 The Canonical Way to Update Your System' In libexec/mail.local I get the following on stderr /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libldap-2.2.so.7, needed by /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: liblber-2.2.so.7, needed by /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_get_dn' /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_unbind' /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_first_entry' /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_simple_bind_s' /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_set_option' /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_memfree' /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_init' /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_search_ext_s' /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_msgfree' >From stdout I had =3D=3D=3D> libexec/mail.local (all) cc -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -march=3Dpentium3m -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -I/usr/local/include/sasl1 -DSASL -c /usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/mail.local/mail.local.c cc -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -march=3Dpentium3m -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -I/usr/local/include/sasl1 -DSASL -L/usr/local/lib -o mail.local mail.local.o /usr/obj/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../lib/libsm/libsm.a -lsasl *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/libexec/mail.local. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/libexec. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. portversion -v on ldap shows [root@beastie:~]# portversion -v | grep ldap openldap-client-2.2.30 =3D up-to-date with port And in /usr/local/lib I do find lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 18 23:27 liblber-2.2.so -> liblber-2.2.so.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 67109 Jan 18 23:27 liblber-2.2.so.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 73738 Jan 18 23:27 liblber.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 18 23:27 liblber.so -> liblber-2.2.= so.7 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 18 23:27 libldap-2.2.so -> libldap-2.2.so.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 233395 Jan 18 23:27 libldap-2.2.so.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 278908 Jan 18 23:27 libldap.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 18 23:27 libldap.so -> libldap-2.2.= so.7 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Jan 18 23:27 libldap_r-2.2.so -> libldap_r-2.2.so.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 254255 Jan 18 23:27 libldap_r-2.2.so.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 310072 Jan 18 23:27 libldap_r.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Jan 18 23:27 libldap_r.so -> libldap_r-2.2.so.7 [root@beastie:/usr/local/lib]# uname -a FreeBSD beastie 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #1: Tue Jan 17 12:53:38 CET 2006 root@beastie:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEASTIE6 i386 Probably something obvious that I'm missing? Thanks in advance, Spil From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:03:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F15716A429 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96CA43D64 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:03:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip03.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.15]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IZ1005N6TG022T1@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:02:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip03.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:03:07 -0300 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:02:20 -0300 From: Duane Whitty In-reply-to: <5fbf03c20605100358o5c2cab16w4bc34c2e9498e1@mail.gmail.com> To: Spil Oss Message-id: <4461D64C.4010601@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAgAAA+kAAAPt References: <5fbf03c20605100358o5c2cab16w4bc34c2e9498e1@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060503) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld failure in libexec.mail.local on 6.1 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:03:16 -0000 Spil Oss wrote: > l.s. > > After running cvsup to RELENG_6_1, I started `make buildworld > KERNCONF=BEASTIE61` as per the handbook's '21.4.1 The Canonical Way to > Update Your System' > > In libexec/mail.local I get the following on stderr > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libldap-2.2.so.7, needed by > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: liblber-2.2.so.7, needed by > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_get_dn' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_unbind' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_first_entry' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_simple_bind_s' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_set_option' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_memfree' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_init' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_search_ext_s' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_msgfree' > >> From stdout I had > ===> libexec/mail.local (all) > cc -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -march=pentium3m > -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. > -I/usr/local/include/sasl1 -DSASL -c > /usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/mail.local/mail.local.c > > cc -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -march=pentium3m > -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. > -I/usr/local/include/sasl1 -DSASL -L/usr/local/lib -o mail.local > mail.local.o /usr/obj/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../lib/libsm/libsm.a > -lsasl > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/libexec/mail.local. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/libexec. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > portversion -v on ldap shows > [root@beastie:~]# portversion -v | grep ldap > openldap-client-2.2.30 = up-to-date with port > > And in /usr/local/lib I do find > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 18 23:27 liblber-2.2.so -> > liblber-2.2.so.7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 67109 Jan 18 23:27 liblber-2.2.so.7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 73738 Jan 18 23:27 liblber.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 18 23:27 liblber.so -> > liblber-2.2.so.7 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 18 23:27 libldap-2.2.so -> > libldap-2.2.so.7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 233395 Jan 18 23:27 libldap-2.2.so.7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 278908 Jan 18 23:27 libldap.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Jan 18 23:27 libldap.so -> > libldap-2.2.so.7 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Jan 18 23:27 libldap_r-2.2.so -> > libldap_r-2.2.so.7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 254255 Jan 18 23:27 libldap_r-2.2.so.7 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 310072 Jan 18 23:27 libldap_r.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Jan 18 23:27 libldap_r.so -> > libldap_r-2.2.so.7 > > [root@beastie:/usr/local/lib]# uname -a > FreeBSD beastie 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #1: Tue Jan 17 12:53:38 > CET 2006 root@beastie:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEASTIE6 i386 > > Probably something obvious that I'm missing? > > Thanks in advance, > > Spil > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > What's in your /etc/make.conf? Duane Whitty -- duane@greenmeadow.ca From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:56:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB92116A400 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A63243D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:55:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.6/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k4ACtwGH037454 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:55:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 164 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BDEA04BE for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:55:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 19B2C30; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:55:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:55:56 +0200 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060510125556.GA2369@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Michel Talon , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.164]); Wed, 10 May 2006 14:55:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 4461E2DE.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Subject: Crash with 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:56:00 -0000 I have installed FreeBSD-6.1 from cdrom yesterday on my machine a P4 with hyperthreading. It crashed some hours later when i was accessing the packages cdrom, specifically doing cd /cdrom/pa This is with the installed kernel, no modification whatsoever. I don't have the corresponding debugging kernel, so all i have is: niobe# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.0 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd". (no debugging symbols found)...Attempt to extract a component of a value that is not a structure pointer. (kgdb) bt #0 0xc0650272 in doadump () #1 0xc06507c9 in boot () #2 0xc0650af1 in panic () #3 0xc084a2cc in trap_fatal () #4 0xc084a00b in trap_pfault () #5 0xc0849c45 in trap () #6 0xc0836c4a in calltrap () #7 0xc061681e in g_io_request () #8 0xc0618de9 in g_vfs_strategy () #9 0xc0620dc9 in cd9660_strategy () #10 0xc085c229 in VOP_STRATEGY_APV () #11 0xc069c5b0 in bufstrategy () #12 0xc0696e19 in breadn () #13 0xc0696d5c in bread () #14 0xc061d6d5 in cd9660_blkatoff () #15 0xc06208a2 in cd9660_readdir () #16 0xc085bf34 in VOP_READDIR_APV () #17 0xc06b26a3 in getdirentries () #18 0xc084a613 in syscall () #19 0xc0836c9f in Xint0x80_syscall () #20 0x00000033 in ?? () I don't suspect a hardware problem since this machine has run FreeBSD-5.3 and 5.4 previously without trouble, there is no overheating, etc. As for the cdrom, after reboot i have installed the whole KDE plus a lot of other things from it without problem. Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) (kgdb) quit From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 12:57:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0ED616A447 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yann@raven.kierun.org) Received: from raven.kierun.org (raven.yorksj.ac.uk [193.61.234.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC7743D80 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:57:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yann@raven.kierun.org) Received: from yann by raven.kierun.org with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdoG0-0004Hd-G0 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:57:36 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:57:36 +0100 From: Yann Golanski To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060510125736.GA16437@kierun.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: "Yann Golanski, University of York, +44(0)1904-433088" Subject: Ath0, netgear WG311T problem. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:57:45 -0000 --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've just installed a Netgear PCI WG311T card and while it works fine under windows, I cannot seem to get it to work under BSD at all. I am just wondering what am I doing wrong?...=20 Anyone has any idea? # uname -a FreeBSD gridlinked.neverness.org 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #6: Fri Apr = 21 10:49:57 BST 2006 root@gridlinked.neverness.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/gri= dlinked i386 # dmesg | grep -i ath =20 ath0: mem 0xeb000000-0xeb00ffff irq 19 at device 12.0 on pci0 ath0: Ethernet address: 00:0f:b5:f8:3b:92 ath0: mac 7.9 phy 4.5 radio 5.6 # ifconfig ath0 inet 192.168.0.14 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid NEVERNESS # tail -1 /var/log/messages May 10 07:55:27 gridlinked kernel: ath0: link state changed to UP # ifconfig ath0 ath0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::20f:b5ff:fef8:3b92%ath0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2=20 inet 192.168.0.14 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 00:0f:b5:f8:3b:92 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (DS/1Mbps) status: associated ssid NEVERNESS channel 6 bssid 00:0f:b5:c1:09:18 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 32 protmode CTS bintval 100 # ifconfig ath0 up scan SSID BSSID CHAN RATE S:N INT CAPS Sha linksys 00:12:17:c5:2d:2a 9 54M 4:0 100 EPS=20 OJS70 00:14:7c:b7:2d:84 11 54M 34:0 100 EPS=20 NEVERNESS 00:0f:b5:c1:09:18 6 54M 24:0 100 ES =20 [Unplug Ethernet cable] # ping 192.168.0.14 PING 192.168.0.14 (192.168.0.14): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: Host is down --=20 yann@kierun.org -=3D*=3D- www.kierun.= org PGP: 009D 7287 C4A7 FD4F 1680 06E4 F751 7006 9DE2 6318 --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYeNA91FwBp3iYxgRAijsAJ0WTaLaUD0M5PfWb4GpFmJ3KRyI9QCfUmKO V4JVISi3akIaSSybUyQB6fY= =4MhH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 13:25:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A0416A5FB for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xelah@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com) Received: from wumpus.mythic-beasts.com (wumpus.mythic-beasts.com [212.69.37.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A8343D58 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:25:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xelah@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com) Received: from sphinx.mythic-beasts.com ([212.69.37.6]) by wumpus.mythic-beasts.com with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1Fdoh6-00069c-FK; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:25:36 +0100 Received: from xelah (helo=localhost) by sphinx.mythic-beasts.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Fdoh5-0005tJ-RW; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:25:35 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:25:35 +0100 (BST) From: Alex Hayward X-X-Sender: xelah@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com To: Scott Harrison In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <372C34B7-18BC-4061-99ED-8321E8109CF7@mithrandir.com> <20060508231759.GC545@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20060509105609.GC66029@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Alex Hayward Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practices for remote upgrade? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:25:40 -0000 On Tue, 9 May 2006, Scott Harrison wrote: > This sounds nice except that I do not have my disk already > partitioned like this. Can I take a 4.7 machine (for example) and > live repartition it to be like this? It /is/ possible to upgrade from at least some versions of FreeBSD 4 to some versions of FreeBSD 5 remotely without a spare partition (I've done it a few times), but there's lots that can go wrong. See http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/stable/2004-01/0033.html Watch out, though, after the 'tar' step you may find your binaries don't work (including binaries like 'reboot'). Keeping a copy is a good idea. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:23:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDDF16A49C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from mail13.worldispnetwork.com (mail13.worldispnetwork.com [66.160.178.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B5B643D69 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:23:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: (qmail 70044 invoked by uid 399); 10 May 2006 15:13:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.30.30.175?) (alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com@200.48.235.53) by mail13.worldispnetwork.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 15:13:35 -0000 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:13:23 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605091109w7f9db50el2c92ac5ae577f672@mail.gmail.com> <200605091712.55316.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> In-Reply-To: <200605091712.55316.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605101013.24251.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Cc: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:23:40 -0000 I tried to install 6.1 STABLE i386 and get the same error rr232x: no controller detected. what is that? El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 17:12, Alejandro Ruiz Robles escribi=F3: > 6.1 STABLE amd64 > > The last messages is: > > Device configuration finished. > procfs registered > linprocfs registered > lapic: Divisior 2, Frecuency 99710124hz > Timecounters "TSC" frecuency 1794793456 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 > Linux ELF exec handler installed > lo0: bpf attached > rr232x: no controller detected. > > Thank you. > > El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 13:09, Scot Hetzel escribi=F3: > > On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > > Thank for your help, the problem is after to select installation > > > default, whitout acpi or safe mode, in all cases the boot loader > > > crashing after the next message: > > > > > > in 6.1 stable > > > > > > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) err= or > > > 6 > > > > Actually, this is from the kernel, not the boot loader. Is the system > > hung at this point or is there any other information displayed after > > this gets printed? As this information would help the developers > > determine whats going wrong on your system. > > > > If there is additional information, a backtrace (bt) from the debugger > > prompt would be useful. > > > > Scot > > -- > > DISCLAIMER: > > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly > > bruised. _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:24:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A4A16A6B6 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from smtp01.udep.edu.pe (smtp01.udep.edu.pe [200.48.235.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13C943D68 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:24:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from [172.30.30.175] ([200.48.235.53]) by upiura1.udep.edu.pe (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k4AFN5oI026524; Wed, 10 May 2006 10:23:05 -0500 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:23:39 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605091109w7f9db50el2c92ac5ae577f672@mail.gmail.com> <200605091712.55316.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> In-Reply-To: <200605091712.55316.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605101023.40058.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:24:16 -0000 I tried to install 6.1 STABLE i386 and get the same error rr232x: no controller detected. what is that? El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 17:12, Alejandro Ruiz Robles escribi=F3: > 6.1 STABLE amd64 > > The last messages is: > > Device configuration finished. > procfs registered > linprocfs registered > lapic: Divisior 2, Frecuency 99710124hz > Timecounters "TSC" frecuency 1794793456 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) error 6 > Linux ELF exec handler installed > lo0: bpf attached > rr232x: no controller detected. > > Thank you. > > El Martes, 9 de Mayo de 2006 13:09, Scot Hetzel escribi=F3: > > On 5/9/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > > Thank for your help, the problem is after to select installation > > > default, whitout acpi or safe mode, in all cases the boot loader > > > crashing after the next message: > > > > > > in 6.1 stable > > > > > > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (arm_linux, 0xffffffff806205d0, 0) err= or > > > 6 > > > > Actually, this is from the kernel, not the boot loader. Is the system > > hung at this point or is there any other information displayed after > > this gets printed? As this information would help the developers > > determine whats going wrong on your system. > > > > If there is additional information, a backtrace (bt) from the debugger > > prompt would be useful. > > > > Scot > > -- > > DISCLAIMER: > > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly > > bruised. _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 15:30:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08A416A626 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:30:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C63D743D6D for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 15:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: (qmail 77911 invoked from network); 10 May 2006 15:29:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noackjr@supercrime.org@24.99.22.177 with login) by smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 15:29:48 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E32D6114; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:29:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at noacks.org Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id I-OmVAAdm9+B; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:29:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2038960D4; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:29:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4AFTj9d008921; Wed, 10 May 2006 11:29:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <446206DF.7020607@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:29:35 -0400 From: Jonathan Noack User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gareth References: <20060510073107.GA19897@lordcow.org> <20060510102222.GA25464@lordcow.org> In-Reply-To: <20060510102222.GA25464@lordcow.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=991D8195; url=http://www.noacks.org/cert/noackjr.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD6FB421CAA45D59543FC3B7A" Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:30:40 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD6FB421CAA45D59543FC3B7A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/10/06 06:22, gareth wrote: > On Wed 2006-05-10 (09:31), gareth wrote: >> hey guys, i've been having this trouble on and off for >> quite awhile, sometimes while running 'portsdb -Uu' >> (after a cvsup) the box just freezes, along with the >> power? i'm running 5.3-RELEASE. >=20 > ok, i did: >=20 > cd /usr/ports > rm INDEX* > make fetchindex >=20 > amongst other things, and every time, running 'portsdb -Uu' > cripples the machine. i'm not too keen to see where exactly > it dies since it'll result in another hard shutdown. You are probably experiencing some of the VFS limitations in 5.3 (you'll be pleasantly surprised by 6.1!). "portsdb -Uu" is very CPU and IO intensive; it takes a long time on a fast machine. "make fetchindex" is provided as a replacement for having to run "portsdb -Uu". The only downside is that the downloaded INDEX-5.db may be a few hours out of date= =2E > but, if i just run portversion, it creates the INDEX-5.db, > so i'm not sure why i'm running 'portsdb -Uu' in the first > place? I would highly recommend checking out portsnap; it builds an up-to-date INDEX-5.db file automatically as part of the update process. -Jonathan --=20 Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 --------------enigD6FB421CAA45D59543FC3B7A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYgbpUFz01pkdgZURAjcBAKCUHHuP1kQhd6HGIws1KF6wQrQVMQCg1dSp gusZ0QIG9lb++37w0Yfiv8A= =Je84 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD6FB421CAA45D59543FC3B7A-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 16:36:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC54A16A5B7 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9F043D60 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:36:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so1252692wxc for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:36:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aLsJ+XMTkUJFBIw0ob2yxDZXZdkskPM0+qmhDWf/S2Z+Grf3XQJDLoYncOykcvy0djKV7RlMZvVmUTUvFKTfEnYc6yCFfCoq/43gBLTGp6irw3sEEy6lqyOMbzOZ/i3AWotneRUH3hooVId/ui/rR/wVOXZe1TT7w+DG+QdT3gk= Received: by 10.70.94.18 with SMTP id r18mr705104wxb; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.53.10 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0605100936i47603f27y4ce9f004017f1f87@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:36:42 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: "Alejandro Ruiz Robles" In-Reply-To: <200605101023.40058.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605091109w7f9db50el2c92ac5ae577f672@mail.gmail.com> <200605091712.55316.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <200605101023.40058.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:36:47 -0000 On 5/10/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > I tried to install 6.1 STABLE i386 > > and get the same error > > rr232x: no controller detected. > > > what is that? > rr232x(4) - HighPoint RocketRAID 232x device driver After my system prints: rr232x: no controller detected. it then detects the disk drives and cdrom drive: module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (amr_linux, 0xffffffff80617c70, 0) error 6 rr232x: no controller detected. ad0: 95396MB at ata0-master UDMA100 ad1: 95396MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master PIO4 pcm0: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a So it looks as though it is unable to find your CD-ROM drive and disk drive= s. When it gets to "rr232x: no controller detected.", can you try hitting the scroll lock key, and then use the page up key, to see if you can scroll the screen up. If you can, check if you are seeing the ata driver being detected: atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x8410-0x841f irq 16 at device 20.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:02:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C473A16A804 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 694BC43D81 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:02:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 81508 invoked from network); 10 May 2006 17:02:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=lRKtnbHj9asWd/3IoEHH2YZIfvxN61aRageWLzS1E8liYgKszisI2uE8UaWOHJHFal7V0vtG9dqNlpzz7vOX4fRIZ7psxD61HVtiaAtE45r5dKOwq26iWSPEA6tUUfc+dvxg8IQebQEsRN5yyzD2sfYR64FWVAYALXC96EXfpGw= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 17:02:30 -0000 Message-ID: <44621CB1.9000403@rogers.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:02:41 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky References: <4460E6D1.1030803@rogers.com> <4461807D.1040504@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20060510103918.X76011@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060510103918.X76011@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't compile without COMPAT_43 on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:02:41 -0000 Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > It seems WITHOUT_MODULES is more appropriate, as written in make.con example: > > # The list of modules to never build, applied *after* MODULES_OVERRIDE. > #WITHOUT_MODULES= bktr plip > Right, but why does it just work on amd64? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:12:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB6916A797 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C29543D45 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1FdsEr-0009RY-OV; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:12:41 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdsFE-000PFi-8q; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:13:04 +0400 To: Mike Jakubik References: <4460E6D1.1030803@rogers.com> <4461807D.1040504@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20060510103918.X76011@woozle.rinet.ru> <44621CB1.9000403@rogers.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:13:04 +0400 In-Reply-To: <44621CB1.9000403@rogers.com> (Mike Jakubik's message of "Wed, 10 May 2006 13:02:41 -0400") Message-ID: <62371311@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky Subject: Re: Can't compile without COMPAT_43 on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:12:46 -0000 On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:02:41 -0400 Mike Jakubik wrote: > Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > It seems WITHOUT_MODULES is more appropriate, as written in make.con example: > > > > # The list of modules to never build, applied *after* MODULES_OVERRIDE. > > #WITHOUT_MODULES= bktr plip > Right, but why does it just work on amd64? Maybe just because we don't have linuxolator for amd64? WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 17:16:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2558216A78E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from smtp01.udep.edu.pe (smtp01.udep.edu.pe [200.48.235.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B45F43D69 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:16:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com) Received: from [172.30.30.175] ([200.48.235.53]) by upiura1.udep.edu.pe (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k4AHF4eK007343; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:15:05 -0500 From: Alejandro Ruiz Robles Organization: Estrategias y Soluciones TI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:15:38 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200605082000.39135.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <200605101023.40058.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> <790a9fff0605100936i47603f27y4ce9f004017f1f87@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0605100936i47603f27y4ce9f004017f1f87@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605101215.38897.alejandro.ruiz@eys-ti.com> Cc: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Problem Installing Freebsd 6.0 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:16:39 -0000 Yes, the ata driver being detected: atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x8410-0x841f irq 16 at device 20.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 El Mi=E9rcoles, 10 de Mayo de 2006 11:36, Scot Hetzel escribi=F3: > On 5/10/06, Alejandro Ruiz Robles wrote: > > I tried to install 6.1 STABLE i386 > > > > and get the same error > > > > rr232x: no controller detected. > > > > > > what is that? > > rr232x(4) - HighPoint RocketRAID 232x device driver > > After my system prints: > > rr232x: no controller detected. > > it then detects the disk drives and cdrom drive: > > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (amr_linux, 0xffffffff80617c70, 0) error 6 > rr232x: no controller detected. > ad0: 95396MB at ata0-master UDMA100 > ad1: 95396MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 > acd0: DVDR at ata1-master PIO4 > pcm0: > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a > > So it looks as though it is unable to find your CD-ROM drive and disk > drives. > > When it gets to "rr232x: no controller detected.", can you try hitting > the scroll lock key, and then use the page up key, to see if you can > scroll the screen up. If you can, check if you are seeing the ata > driver being detected: > > atapci0: port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x8410-0x841f irq 16 at device > 20.1 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:26:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E430F16AAD8 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB1943D9F for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:26:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4AIQcSd003126; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:26:38 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:26:38 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Mike Jakubik In-Reply-To: <44621CB1.9000403@rogers.com> Message-ID: <20060510222613.U2166@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <4460E6D1.1030803@rogers.com> <4461807D.1040504@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20060510103918.X76011@woozle.rinet.ru> <44621CB1.9000403@rogers.com> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 10 May 2006 22:26:38 +0400 (MSD) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't compile without COMPAT_43 on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:27:10 -0000 On Wed, 10 May 2006, Mike Jakubik wrote: MJ> Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: MJ> > It seems WITHOUT_MODULES is more appropriate, as written in make.con MJ> > example: MJ> > MJ> > # The list of modules to never build, applied *after* MODULES_OVERRIDE. MJ> > #WITHOUT_MODULES= bktr plip MJ> > MJ> MJ> Right, but why does it just work on amd64? Because there is mo linux module(s) om amd64, see /sys/modules/Makefile ;-) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 18:33:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9100316AA18 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:33:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EA143D6E for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:33:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Philippe.Pegon@crc.u-strasbg.fr) Received: from [IPv6:2001:660:2402:1001:20e:cff:fe60:e734] (apophis.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402:1001:20e:cff:fe60:e734]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.13.4/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id k4AIXREC016515 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:33:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <446231F7.2040103@crc.u-strasbg.fr> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:33:27 +0200 From: Philippe Pegon User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060503) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [IPv6:2001:660:2402::151]); Wed, 10 May 2006 20:33:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.1/1455/Wed May 10 17:34:38 2006 on mr1.u-strasbg.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_RELAYS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on mr1.u-strasbg.fr Subject: carp with IPv6 broken on 6.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:33:33 -0000 Hi, it seems that carp is broken on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE when an inet6 address is configured on a carp interface. Since I upgraded from 6.0 to 6.1 (today) I can't see IPv6 carp advertisement with tcpdump. Did someone else observe this ? thanks -- Philippe Pegon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 19:01:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD44516A7FA for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE61043D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:01:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 68922 invoked from network); 10 May 2006 19:01:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GM5bZS30PemM3jtOlBt8p7SXC81Xb26gAGn7IFxi6sy+XvnFT4yx6YqxZ3hYt28Bfm/voEO0EUXAq/mu+H3WYkQtJxNXyKV93kqHQZ90mOqI4F+G/DnyJuQAedslhjD6G/w71YkedrurgksfD2BKCQp9wskYYnQE7IZwgqdQkXE= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2006 19:01:08 -0000 Message-ID: <4462387E.4050205@rogers.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:01:18 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky References: <4460E6D1.1030803@rogers.com> <4461807D.1040504@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20060510103918.X76011@woozle.rinet.ru> <44621CB1.9000403@rogers.com> <20060510222613.U2166@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060510222613.U2166@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't compile without COMPAT_43 on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:01:14 -0000 Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2006, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > MJ> Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > MJ> > It seems WITHOUT_MODULES is more appropriate, as written in make.con > MJ> > example: > MJ> > > MJ> > # The list of modules to never build, applied *after* MODULES_OVERRIDE. > MJ> > #WITHOUT_MODULES= bktr plip > MJ> > > MJ> > MJ> Right, but why does it just work on amd64? > > Because there is mo linux module(s) om amd64, see /sys/modules/Makefile ;-) > Right, only the i386 compatible linux. The module options did the job, thanks. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:31:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA88D16A4C4 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jr@opal.com) Received: from smtp.vzavenue.net (smtp.vzavenue.net [66.171.59.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0002943D49 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:31:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jr@opal.com) Received: from 118.79.171.66.subscriber.vzavenue.net (HELO linwhf.opal.com) ([66.171.79.118]) by smtp.vzavenue.net with ESMTP; 10 May 2006 18:31:22 -0400 X-REPUTATION: -0.7 X-REMOTE-IP: 66.171.79.118 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,111,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="26637764:sNHT14407632" Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linwhf.opal.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4AMVKdG008090 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:31:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jr@opal.com) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=linwhf.opal.com) by ASSP-nospam ; 10 May 06 22:31:20 -0000 Received: (from jr@localhost) by linwhf.opal.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4AMVK4f008089 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:31:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jr) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:31:20 -0400 From: "J.R. Oldroyd" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060510223120.GB7530@linwhf.opal.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Regression: apm no longer works between 6.1-RC1 and 6.1-STABLE 2006/05/09 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:31:24 -0000 I have just taken the system on a Sony Vaio PCG-Z505SX laptop from 6.1-RC1 (2006/03/23) to 6.1-STABLE (2006/05/09) using a cvsup update and full buildworld/buildkernel rebuild, while keeping the same kernel config. On booting the new system, apm no longer works. Now, acpi never work on this hardware anyway, but apm always worked fine. On the 6.1-STABLE kernel, it doesn't probe or load properly at boot time. For reasons I no longer recall, "device apm" is configured in this kernel, rather than loading it as a module, and this has been fine for years, in fact, since back in the 5.x days and for several 6.0 kernels as well as 6.1-RC1. Here's the pertinent boot info: FreeBSD 6.1-RC1 (2006/03/23): real memory = 134152192 (127 MB) avail memory = 121733120 (116 MB) ACPI disabled by blacklist. Contact your BIOS vendor. npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface cpu0 on motherboard apm0: on motherboard apm0: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pir0: on motherboard FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE (2006/05/09): real memory = 134152192 (127 MB) avail memory = 121733120 (116 MB) ACPI disabled by blacklist. Contact your BIOS vendor. cpu0 on motherboard apm: Other PM system enabled. pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pir0: on motherboard On 6.1-STABLE, the /dev/apm device is not created and so none of the apm tools work. I don't see any changes to any of the apm code (in the last year or so, actually), so this is presumably due to a change at a lower level? Any thoughts? -jr From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 23:28:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A764916A48C for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob.grimstveit@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EB743D46 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:28:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jakob.grimstveit@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so36430wxc for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:28:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=jYnuDOwJig+NAtwnfEaRe31KHKLzrd5UiutArbsEOA8Jh9yBMc+bb5BR97Absxe1X/4XfgIocTVz67CAjB5wn5knOugEOue4zFAEixtK10VU5wV48lp2mxlpehjDVaVLepuZazRCKOslYhmSfuhQ0pIaS01QGM9cjOKefJEwHCk= Received: by 10.70.75.1 with SMTP id x1mr215641wxa; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.69.7 with HTTP; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <77d930220605101628h3d5300d8g54c54c6896f46855@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:28:29 +0200 From: "Jakob Breivik Grimstveit" Sender: jakob.grimstveit@gmail.com To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: f3f421cf3a8302f8 Subject: panic: page fault on freshly installed 6.1 from cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:28:31 -0000 Hi, freebsd-stable, Just cvsupped and built my own v6.1, and am now unable to boot system. Boot process proceeds to the USB detection phase, and locks right after with panic: page fault. Here is a transcript of what is shown on-screen before crash appears: nvidia0: mem 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xe8000000-oxeffffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 WARNING: Device driver " Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address =3D 0x480008 fault code =3D supervisor read, page not prese= nt instruction pointer =3D 0x20:0xc05936d6 stack pointer =3D 0x28:0xc102079c frame pointer =3D 0x28:0xc102079c code segment =3D base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0= x1b =3D DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags =3D interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL= =3D 0 current process =3D 0 (swapper) trap number =3D 12 panic: page fault Uptime: 1s Probably a few minor typos, but you get my drift. What fails here, and what on earth can I do to be able to boot the box again? KERNCONF based on GENERIC, but removing RAID, SCSI, all network cards (except MIIBUS and RA), and added sound and atapicam. Make.conf also excludes the following: NO_ATM=3DYES NO_AUTHPF=3Dyes NO_BLUETOOTH=3Dyes NO_FORTRAN=3Dyes NO_GAMES=3Dyes NO_I4B=3Dyes NO_INET6=3DYES NO_IPFILTER=3Dyes NO_KERBEROS=3Dyes NO_LPR=3Dyes NO_OBJC=3Dyes NO_PF=3Dyes NO_PROFILE=3Dyes NO_SENDMAIL=3Dyes NO_TCSH=3Dyes NO_USB=3Dyes NO_VINUM=3DYES Hope someone can shed any light on this, I'm completely left in the blind... Single-user mode boot also fails, of course. -- Jakob Breivik Grimstveit - http://www.grimstveit.no/jakob - +47 48298152 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 00:03:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8B816A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cscotts@mindspring.com) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4D0C43D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:03:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cscotts@mindspring.com) Received: (qmail 78924 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 00:03:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 11 May 2006 00:03:04 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 68.79.13.249 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Scott Sipe Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:03:02 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) Subject: SMBus device X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:03:05 -0000 Running 6.1-Release (upgraded from 6-stable) on an Intel server motherboard. In the boot dmesg I get this line: pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) I have nothing relating to SMB compiled in my kernel. I do "kldload ichsmb" ichsmb0: port 0x400-0x41f irq 17 at device 31.3 on pci0 ichsmb0: [GIANT-LOCKED] smbus0: on ichsmb0 then "kldload smb" (do I need to do this?) smb0: on smbus0 I now have /dev/smb0 # mbmon -S -s0 -d ioctl(smb0:writebyte): Device not configured If I unload all the SMB related modules and run mbmon, I get # mbmon -d ioctl(smb0:open): No such file or directory SMBus[Intel8XX(ICH/ICH2/ICH3/ICH4/ICH5/ICH6)] found, but No HWM available on it!! Using ISA-IO access method!! * Winbond Chip W83627HF/THF/THF-A found. and just running mbmon gives an output # mbmon ioctl(smb0:open): No such file or directory Temp.= 127.0, 115.0, 127.0; Rot.= 0, 1834, 2812 Vcore = 0.00, 1.17; Volt. = 3.33, 5.00, 12.22, 1.62, 0.23 I've tried the "consolehm" port as well, and it gives a lot of "IOCTL: Device not configured" errors. Am I doing something wrong? Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 05:46:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60A416A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:46:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FA343D48 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:46:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from srv.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1]) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Fe400-000BKk-Qr; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:46:08 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fe40L-0000HP-Pl; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:46:29 +0400 To: "Jakob Breivik Grimstveit" References: <77d930220605101628h3d5300d8g54c54c6896f46855@mail.gmail.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:46:29 +0400 In-Reply-To: <77d930220605101628h3d5300d8g54c54c6896f46855@mail.gmail.com> (Jakob Breivik Grimstveit's message of "Thu, 11 May 2006 01:28:29 +0200") Message-ID: <28451466@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: page fault on freshly installed 6.1 from cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 05:46:11 -0000 On Thu, 11 May 2006 01:28:29 +0200 Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote: > Just cvsupped and built my own v6.1, and am now unable to boot system. > Boot process proceeds to the USB detection phase, and locks right > after with panic: page fault. > Here is a transcript of what is shown on-screen before crash appears: > nvidia0: mem > 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xe8000000-oxeffffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff irq > 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 > WARNING: Device driver " Did you install nvidia driver from ports? Then you should rebuild it. > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x480008 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc05936d6 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xc102079c > frame pointer = 0x28:0xc102079c > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 0 (swapper) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > Uptime: 1s > Probably a few minor typos, but you get my drift. What fails here, and > what on earth can I do to be able to boot the box again? KERNCONF > based on GENERIC, but removing RAID, SCSI, all network cards (except > MIIBUS and RA), and added sound and atapicam. Make.conf also excludes > the following: > NO_ATM=YES > NO_AUTHPF=yes > NO_BLUETOOTH=yes > NO_FORTRAN=yes > NO_GAMES=yes > NO_I4B=yes > NO_INET6=YES > NO_IPFILTER=yes > NO_KERBEROS=yes > NO_LPR=yes > NO_OBJC=yes > NO_PF=yes > NO_PROFILE=yes > NO_SENDMAIL=yes > NO_TCSH=yes > NO_USB=yes > NO_VINUM=YES > Hope someone can shed any light on this, I'm completely left in the > blind... Single-user mode boot also fails, of course. WBR -- bsam From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 06:52:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AC416A402; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yann@raven.kierun.org) Received: from raven.kierun.org (raven.yorksj.ac.uk [193.61.234.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382D643D45; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:52:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yann@raven.kierun.org) Received: from yann by raven.kierun.org with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fe52U-0007Fq-P5; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:52:46 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:52:46 +0100 From: Yann Golanski To: Fabian Keil Message-ID: <20060511065246.GA27635@kierun.org> References: <20060510070406.GA8103@kierun.org> <20060510155149.68d6c8ea@localhost> <20060510140605.GA17716@kierun.org> <20060510202247.5b7166e1@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060510202247.5b7166e1@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: "Yann Golanski, University of York, +44(0)1904-433088" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ath0, netgear WG311T problem. [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 06:52:46 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Fabian Keil on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 20:22:47 +0200 > > > This could be the result of a routing problem. > > > What's the output of ifconfig and netstat -rn? > >=20 > > Yeah, that look like a likely culprit. How do I change that? >=20 > Using two IPs on the same network, with the same netmask > on two different interfaces at the same time is asking for > trouble. >=20 > You can use route(8) to reconfigure the routes, but unless you > change xl0's IP when it's down, it will grab the default route > again.=20 >=20 > I guess you never need both NICs on the same network at the > same time, so why don't you use a script which brings one > NIC down, removes the IP, flushes all routes, brings the other > NIC up, sets the IP and reconfigures the routes? Many thank indeed, that did indeed solve the problem.=20 Now, all I need to do is to use some encryption and some find some monitoring software to give me signal strength and things like that. Any recommendations on either? --=20 yann@kierun.org -=3D*=3D- www.kierun.= org PGP: 009D 7287 C4A7 FD4F 1680 06E4 F751 7006 9DE2 6318 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEYt8+91FwBp3iYxgRAiYaAJ499OsgGad0nIS+T5nkoYQiWS2VDgCfT4ks HhPvYKCoCeY5tMdUDKLQLlM= =pcPC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 07:08:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF39B16A416; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:08:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A8943D45; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:08:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4B77euN053601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 May 2006 16:37:41 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:37:38 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060510070406.GA8103@kierun.org> <20060510202247.5b7166e1@localhost> <20060511065246.GA27635@kierun.org> In-Reply-To: <20060511065246.GA27635@kierun.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart163905629.xL1kMHSIvX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605111637.40473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.36 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ath0, netgear WG311T problem. [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:08:04 -0000 --nextPart163905629.xL1kMHSIvX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 11 May 2006 16:22, Yann Golanski wrote: > Now, all I need to do is to use some encryption and some find some Use WPA - man wpa_supplicant. (Assuming your AP can support it) > monitoring software to give me signal strength and things like that. > Any recommendations on either? ifconfig ath0 scan? :) I see there is a gkrellm plugin in ports but I've never used it. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart163905629.xL1kMHSIvX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEYuK85ZPcIHs/zowRAtXiAJ9Q6c/RsMZk+2BLSBXSd8E/RVJBHACgndKW eDbNw1DnVF3lJxD6ZFP8nTs= =QXkG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart163905629.xL1kMHSIvX-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 08:41:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF03916A419 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12E3D43D55 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:41:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie ([134.226.81.10] helo=walton.maths.tcd.ie) by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 11 May 2006 09:41:50 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:41:49 +0100 From: David Malone To: "J.R. Oldroyd" Message-ID: <20060511084149.GA2794@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <20060510223120.GB7530@linwhf.opal.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060510223120.GB7530@linwhf.opal.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression: apm no longer works between 6.1-RC1 and 6.1-STABLE 2006/05/09 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:41:53 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:31:20PM -0400, J.R. Oldroyd wrote: > apm: Other PM system enabled. Could you edit /usr/src/sys/i386/bios/apm.c and a go to line which says: printf("apm: Other PM system enabled.\n"); and replace it with: printf("apm: Other (%d) PM system enabled.\n", (int)power_pm_get_type()); and recompile and install your kernels and modules? I suspect that it will show 1 for the type, which means that acpi has somehow claimed the power management even though it is supposed to be turned off. David. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 09:11:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315E316A41B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:11:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@irfu.se) Received: from elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (elvira.its.UU.SE [130.238.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B5F43D62 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:11:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuri@irfu.se) Received: by elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 204) id 999D8E0A; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:11:14 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from elvira.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by elvira.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s26650; Thu, 11 May 06 11:11:10 +0200 Received: from hq.irfu.se (hq.irfu.se [130.238.30.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDD0DD7; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:11:09 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from ice.irfu.se (ice.irfu.se [130.238.30.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by hq.irfu.se (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4B9B8Hq071002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 May 2006 11:11:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from yuri@irfu.se) From: Yuri Khotyaintsev Organization: Swedish Institute of Space Physics To: Kris Kennaway Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:11:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605081354.58807.yuri@irfu.se> <20060508174133.GA48163@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060508174133.GA48163@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605111111.07882.yuri@irfu.se> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on hq.irfu.se Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS/TCP problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:11:20 -0000 On Monday 08 May 2006 19:41, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:54:58PM +0200, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote: > > I have an NSF server and several clients which write large text files to > > the server. All machines are running max one week old STABLE and are > > connected to the same gigabit switch, and have identical nics (em). Amd > > mount options are: /defaults > > type:=3Dnfs;cache:=3Dall;opts:=3Drw,intr,nosuid,grpid,nfsv3,tcp,resvpor= t,soft > > > > Almost all the time I get the following messages on the server: > > > > nfsd send error 32 > > nfsd send error 32 > > nfsd send error 32 > > nfsd send error 32 > > nfsd send error 32 > > ... > > > > And corresponding messages on a client: > > > > impossible packet length (8996061) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > > impossible packet length (3123011) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > > impossible packet length (893006905) from nfs server db:/export/data1/c= aa > > impossible packet length (842018868) from nfs server db:/export/data1/c= aa > > impossible packet length (874220) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > > impossible packet length (14182767) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > > impossible packet length (16777216) from nfs server db:/export/data1/caa > > impossible packet length (758134573) from nfs server db:/export/data1/c= aa > > impossible packet length (1503661568) from nfs server > > db:/export/data1/caa impossible packet length (1300840) from nfs server > > db:/export/data1/caa ... > > > > And from time to time the files which are written to the server get > > truncated (regardless of the file size)... > > > > Does anybody have an idea how to make it work reliably and not to > > truncate the files? > > mohan committed a fix for one such problem a few days ago. It will > not be in 6.1-RELEASE, but you should be able to apply the patch > yourself. It would be nice to know how it works for you. > > =20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_socket.c.diff= ?r >1=3Dtext&tr1=3D1.136&r2=3Dtext&tr2=3D1.139 I have patched nfs_socket.c on all clients and run the same kind of process= ing=20 which was causing the problem. I can report that the problem is gone with=20 nfs_socket.c rev 1.139. I only got one "nfs send error 35" on one of the=20 clients instead of hundreds of messages I was seeing before. Thank you very= =20 much! BTW, what is better/faster TCP or UDP for running NFS between hosts connect= ed=20 to the same gigabit switch? =2D-=20 Dr. Yuri Khotyaintsev Institutet f=C3=B6r rymdfysik (IRF), Uppsala From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 09:31:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD7316A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anonymous@thoughtjunction.com) Received: from thoughtjunction.com (thoughtjunction.com [69.93.86.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE42743D4C for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:31:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anonymous@thoughtjunction.com) Received: (qmail 19875 invoked by uid 48); 11 May 2006 01:55:15 -0500 Date: 11 May 2006 01:55:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20060511065515.19874.qmail@thoughtjunction.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Chase Online Banking MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Password change required! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:31:20 -0000 [chaseNew.gif] Password change required! Dear Chase Member, We recently have determined that different computers have logged in to your Chase account, and multiple password failures were present before the logons. We strongly advice CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD. If this is not completed by May 10 , 2006, we will be forced to suspend your account indefinitely, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. Thank you for your cooperation. [1]Click here to Change Your Password Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. We apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you for using Chase! _________________________________________________________________ Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. [pixel.gif] setstats 1 References 1. http://www.chaseonline.walliams.com/colappmgr/colportal/prospect.php?_nfpb=change_form From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 09:34:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D04E16A41B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergei_suprunov@rambler.ru) Received: from stc.donpac.ru (stc.donpac.ru [80.254.115.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8BD43D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:34:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sergei_suprunov@rambler.ru) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (prog-kn.stc.donpac.ru [10.161.193.203]) by stc.donpac.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/calex3.0.0.3) with ESMTP id k4B9YQa4092923 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:34:27 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from sergei_suprunov@rambler.ru) X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.0.10250, virus records: 102335, updated: 7.01.2006] Message-ID: <4463052F.4010304@rambler.ru> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:34:39 +0400 From: SeSu User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: File DEFAULTS in 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:34:35 -0000 Hi all! What is the DEFAULTS file in /usr/src/sys//conf for? Thanks :) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 09:35:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598E316A412 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergei@konst.donpac.ru) Received: from stc.donpac.ru (stc.donpac.ru [80.254.115.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C7143D45 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:35:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sergei@konst.donpac.ru) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (prog-kn.stc.donpac.ru [10.161.193.203]) by stc.donpac.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/calex3.0.0.3) with ESMTP id k4B9Zqw6093308 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:35:52 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from sergei@konst.donpac.ru) X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.0.10250, virus records: 102335, updated: 7.01.2006] Message-ID: <44630585.7080408@konst.donpac.ru> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:36:05 +0400 From: Sergei User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: DEFAULTS file in 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:35:55 -0000 Hi all! What is the DEFAULTS file in /usr/src/sys//conf for? Thanks :) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 10:09:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6146B16A413 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (gw.zefyris.com [213.41.131.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4943043D6D for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4BA91IM067085; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:09:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: (from ftigeot@localhost) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k4BA91h4067084; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:09:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ftigeot) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:09:00 +0200 From: Francois Tigeot To: Spil Oss Message-ID: <20060511100900.GA65256@aoi.wolfpond.org> References: <5fbf03c20605100358o5c2cab16w4bc34c2e9498e1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5fbf03c20605100358o5c2cab16w4bc34c2e9498e1@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld failure in libexec.mail.local on 6.1 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:09:43 -0000 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:58:49PM +0200, Spil Oss wrote: > l.s. > > After running cvsup to RELENG_6_1, I started `make buildworld > KERNCONF=BEASTIE61` as per the handbook's '21.4.1 The Canonical Way to > Update Your System' > > In libexec/mail.local I get the following on stderr > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libldap-2.2.so.7, needed by > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: liblber-2.2.so.7, needed by > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_get_dn' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_unbind' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_first_entry' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_simple_bind_s' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_set_option' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_memfree' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_init' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_search_ext_s' > /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so: undefined reference to `ldap_msgfree' > > >From stdout I had > ===> libexec/mail.local (all) > cc -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -march=pentium3m > -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. > -I/usr/local/include/sasl1 -DSASL -c > /usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/mail.local/mail.local.c > cc -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -march=pentium3m > -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. > -I/usr/local/include/sasl1 -DSASL -L/usr/local/lib -o mail.local > mail.local.o /usr/obj/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../lib/libsm/libsm.a > -lsasl > *** Error code 1 I guess you're trying to use a sendmail compiled with SMTP AUTH support. I have the same problem here. Even though libldap-2.2.so.7 and liblber-2.2.so.7 are in /usr/local/lib and cc has a -L/usr/local/lib flag, ld doesn't find them. Even putting the libraries in /usr/lib doesn't correct this error. -- Francois Tigeot From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 10:10:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF3916A419 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pokui@psg.com) Received: from pjo.trueafrican.com (dhcp-223-113.ws.afnog.org [196.200.223.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D637543D6A for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pokui@psg.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pjo.trueafrican.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3830139B8B; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:01:03 +0300 (EAT) From: Patrick Okui To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:01:01 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <44630585.7080408@konst.donpac.ru> In-Reply-To: <44630585.7080408@konst.donpac.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605111301.02163.pokui@psg.com> Cc: Sergei Subject: Re: DEFAULTS file in 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:10:46 -0000 Firstly do you mind NOT posting the same question twice on the same list in quick succession? On Thursday 11 May 2006 12:36, Sergei wrote: > Hi all! > > What is the DEFAULTS file in /usr/src/sys//conf for? In short a semi violation of POLA in favour of reducing traffic on questions@ (and other general support avenues). The idea was to stick things in here that if removed from your kernel conf things would almost DEFINITELY break the build. so... the configure KERNEL_NAME does whatever you put in there in addition to what is in DEFAULTS. See the threads on stable@ for lots of discussions (and flames) on this. > > Thanks :) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- patrick From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 11:54:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E59816A42B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg@core.zp.ua) Received: from core.zp.ua (core.zp.ua [193.108.112.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE7843D53 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:54:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oleg@core.zp.ua) Received: from core.zp.ua (oleg@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core.zp.ua with ESMTPœ id k4BBsaBw074718 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:54:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from oleg@core.zp.ua)œ Received: (from oleg@localhost) by core.zp.ua id k4BBsZgg074717 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:54:35 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:54:35 +0300 From: "Oleg V. Nauman" To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060511115435.GC36980@core.zp.ua> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: RELENG_6 (amd64): small problem with kbdmux X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:54:44 -0000 --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Seems to be I have a small problem with kbdmux: it prevents to leds keyboard status changes indicating. No any NumLock, CapsLock or ScrollLock with my PS/2 keyboard status changes indicated but keyboard status itself= =20 changed perfectly, just without leds indication. Removing kbdmux from the kernel fixes this small issue. System in question: FreeBSD nauman.ecommerce-dev.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #19: Wed May= 10 23:25:23 EEST 2006 root@nauman.ecommerce-dev.com:/usr/src/sys/amd64/c= ompile/oleg amd64 And my PS/2 keyboard (current kernel without kbdmux loaded): atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] Looks like i386 (and amd64 in the 32 bit emulation mode) doesn't have that issue. I'm ready to provide any additional info about system in question. --=20 NO37-RIPE --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQCVAwUBRGMl8/C2y8Tb/5DvAQEpHQP8DFnZipToi8QZFr4wu/3YAcSHxzFrshmK oBh+7nRqzk+8wjnj89NicRp5Zf5k5+ZeDx1v+UZA7HG/dsI6HNhWYO6+wuVg17aJ CkdBsNWTH4Y5J7GNGqDU2/jyG5wXvSbWsLQb2SDzV+OZuc98dShJPED9If0IpEGt /kA+pmQ4EkQ= =9Noq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 14:27:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0417E16A402 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:27:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B5A443DE for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:27:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4BERHE1004912; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:27:17 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id k4BERG7E004911; Thu, 11 May 2006 07:27:16 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:27:16 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: SeSu Message-ID: <20060511142716.GA1107@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <4463052F.4010304@rambler.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4463052F.4010304@rambler.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File DEFAULTS in 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:27:19 -0000 --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:34:39PM +0400, SeSu wrote: > Hi all! >=20 > What is the DEFAULTS file in /usr/src/sys//conf for? It contains things which theoreticaly can be changed, but in practice should not. It is always part of your kernel config. For example, no i386 machines work without a FPU (device npx). -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEY0m2XY6L6fI4GtQRAnhlAKDKPXLWvldGrJWpZwrrws2yh8byRACeM2wx u/pjWsHx9u1KGa/f9zz7Wzc= =Jw/w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:39:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB7C16A401 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jr@opal.com) Received: from smtp.vzavenue.net (smtp.vzavenue.net [66.171.59.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8F2445E4 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:39:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jr@opal.com) Received: from 118.79.171.66.subscriber.vzavenue.net (HELO linwhf.opal.com) ([66.171.79.118]) by smtp.vzavenue.net with ESMTP; 11 May 2006 11:39:25 -0400 X-REPUTATION: -0.7 X-REMOTE-IP: 66.171.79.118 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,116,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="26774524:sNHT15678171" Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linwhf.opal.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4BFdPNW024188; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:39:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jr@opal.com) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=linwhf.opal.com) by ASSP-nospam ; 11 May 06 15:39:25 -0000 Received: (from jr@localhost) by linwhf.opal.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4BFdOhx024187; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:39:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jr) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:39:24 -0400 From: "J.R. Oldroyd" To: David Malone Message-ID: <20060511153924.GD7530@linwhf.opal.com> References: <20060510223120.GB7530@linwhf.opal.com> <20060511084149.GA2794@walton.maths.tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060511084149.GA2794@walton.maths.tcd.ie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression: apm no longer works between 6.1-RC1 and 6.1-STABLE 2006/05/09 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:39:28 -0000 On May 11, 09:41, David Malone wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:31:20PM -0400, J.R. Oldroyd wrote: > > apm: Other PM system enabled. > > Could you edit /usr/src/sys/i386/bios/apm.c and a go to line > which says: > > printf("apm: Other PM system enabled.\n"); > > and replace it with: > > printf("apm: Other (%d) PM system enabled.\n", (int)power_pm_get_type()); > > and recompile and install your kernels and modules? I suspect that > it will show 1 for the type, which means that acpi has somehow > claimed the power management even though it is supposed to be turned > off. > > David. Well, I added this instrumentation, but at the same time I also removed "device apm" from the kernel config and added "apm_load="YES"" to loader.conf.local so that I could play with it more easily. Rebuilt... rebooted... needless to say, it works now! apm0: on motherboard apm0: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 Does loading it as a module change the order in which apm and acpi are probed? It looks like I had not edited this kernel config since late 2004, and had used it, i.e., with "device apm" included, for builds of several 6.0 and early 6.1 kernels with apm being fine. In the cvsup I did between 6.1-RC1 and the recent 6.1-STABLE, the following 149 files had been updated. Maybe this will help pinpoint where something was changed... sys/amd64/amd64/busdma_machdep.c sys/amd64/amd64/fpu.c sys/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c sys/amd64/amd64/initcpu.c sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC sys/amd64/conf/NOTES sys/amd64/include/md_var.h sys/amd64/include/specialreg.h sys/boot/forth/beastie.4th sys/boot/i386/cdboot/cdboot.s sys/boot/i386/pxeldr/pxeldr.S sys/cam/scsi/scsi_cd.c sys/conf/NOTES sys/conf/files sys/conf/files.alpha sys/conf/files.amd64 sys/conf/files.i386 sys/conf/files.ia64 sys/conf/files.pc98 sys/conf/files.powerpc sys/conf/files.sparc64 sys/conf/newvers.sh sys/conf/options sys/contrib/pf/net/pf_norm.c sys/dev/acpica/Osd/OsdSchedule.c sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c sys/dev/ata/ata-all.h sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c sys/dev/ata/ata-raid.c sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c sys/dev/ata/atapi-cd.c sys/dev/ata/atapi-fd.c sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c sys/dev/bfe/if_bfe.c sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c sys/dev/hme/if_hme.c sys/dev/mii/brgphy.c sys/dev/mii/miidevs sys/dev/sound/isa/ad1816.c sys/dev/sound/isa/mss.c sys/dev/sound/pci/csapcm.c sys/dev/sound/pci/ich.c sys/dev/sound/pci/via8233.c sys/dev/sound/pci/atiixp.c sys/dev/sound/pcm/channel.c sys/dev/sound/pcm/dsp.c sys/dev/sound/pcm/mixer.c sys/dev/sound/pcm/sound.c sys/dev/sound/pcm/sound.h sys/dev/sound/pcm/vchan.c sys/dev/sound/usb/uaudio.c sys/dev/usb/hid.c sys/dev/usb/umass.c sys/dev/usb/if_ural.c sys/dev/atkbdc/psm.c sys/dev/le/am7990.c sys/dev/le/am79900.c sys/dev/ipw/if_ipw.c sys/dev/ipw/if_ipwvar.h sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c sys/geom/gate/g_gate.c sys/geom/gate/g_gate.h sys/geom/mirror/g_mirror.c sys/geom/geom_bsd.c sys/geom/nop/g_nop.c sys/geom/raid3/g_raid3.c sys/geom/stripe/g_stripe.c sys/geom/stripe/g_stripe.h sys/geom/shsec/g_shsec.c sys/geom/shsec/g_shsec.h sys/geom/eli/g_eli.c sys/geom/zero/g_zero.c sys/gnu/fs/ext2fs/ext2_bitops.h sys/i386/conf/GENERIC sys/i386/conf/NOTES sys/i386/i386/busdma_machdep.c sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c sys/i386/i386/initcpu.c sys/i386/i386/machdep.c sys/i386/i386/mem.c sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c sys/i386/include/md_var.h sys/i386/include/specialreg.h sys/i386/isa/npx.c sys/ia64/ia64/nexus.c sys/kern/kern_event.c sys/kern/kern_intr.c sys/kern/kern_synch.c sys/kern/kern_thread.c sys/kern/md5c.c sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c sys/kern/subr_witness.c sys/kern/tty_pty.c sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c sys/kern/vfs_subr.c sys/modules/Makefile sys/modules/ath/Makefile sys/modules/smbfs/Makefile sys/net/if_bridge.c sys/net/if_media.h sys/net/if_ppp.c sys/net/route.h sys/net/rtsock.c sys/net80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c sys/net80211/ieee80211_output.c sys/netgraph/netflow/netflow.c sys/netgraph/netflow/netflow.h sys/netinet6/ip6_mroute.c sys/netinet6/ipsec.c sys/netinet6/nd6.c sys/netipsec/ipsec.h sys/netipsec/ipsec_mbuf.c sys/netipsec/xform.h sys/netipsec/xform_ah.c sys/netipsec/xform_esp.c sys/netipsec/xform_ipcomp.c sys/netipsec/xform_ipip.c sys/netipx/ipx_ip.c sys/netsmb/smb_crypt.c sys/netsmb/smb_smb.c sys/nfsclient/nfs_bio.c sys/nfsclient/nfs_socket.c sys/nfsclient/nfs_vnops.c sys/nfsserver/nfs_srvsubs.c sys/nfsserver/nfsrvcache.h sys/sparc64/include/asi.h sys/sparc64/sparc64/eeprom.c sys/sparc64/sparc64/exception.S sys/sparc64/sparc64/interrupt.S sys/sparc64/sparc64/machdep.c sys/sparc64/sparc64/mp_machdep.c sys/sparc64/sparc64/tick.c sys/sys/ata.h sys/sys/interrupt.h sys/sys/mbuf.h sys/sys/md5.h sys/sys/param.h sys/sys/systm.h sys/sys/taskqueue.h sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c sys/ufs/ufs/ufsmount.h sys/vm/vm_contig.c From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 15:54:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77F316A4C1 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51BD4458B for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:36:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 65E972EE3; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:36:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:36:01 -0500 To: Chris Message-ID: <20060511153601.GA4689@soaustin.net> References: <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <20060505192152.GA17616@soaustin.net> <3aaaa3a0605061326n2f18e38epf6b93f2042385cec@mail.gmail.com> <445D55D9.5070701@samsco.org> <3aaaa3a0605071216m5fa3b38fu7c1afde22dd5e2e0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0605071216m5fa3b38fu7c1afde22dd5e2e0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:54:18 -0000 On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:16:42PM +0100, Chris wrote: > GNATS didnt reply so I will send the info about email address I used > and see if I can find the pr number as well. Any problems you have with GNATS not responding, please email them to bugmaster@FreeBSD.org and we'll try to figure out what's going on. > I will have to on my 5.4 server's to 5.5 since 5.4 is EOL end of May. I think we just extended the 5.4 support time to match 5.3. 5.4 is so superior to 5.3 that we'd really rather people be on it. OTOH we've already committed to support 5.3 for N more months and there it is. mcl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 20:14:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8628816A4D9 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:14:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nik@ngo.org.uk) Received: from jc.ngo.org.uk (jc.ngo.org.uk [69.55.225.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED9243D68 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nik@ngo.org.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (i-83-67-27-141.freedom2surf.net [83.67.27.141]) by jc.ngo.org.uk (8.13.4/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k4BKEWII033404 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:14:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nik@ngo.org.uk) Message-ID: <44630A5B.2030906@ngo.org.uk> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:56:43 +0100 From: Nik Clayton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060504) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: (0.746) DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 69.55.225.33 Cc: Subject: Switching virtual consoles from within X X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:15:38 -0000 Is it possible to (from the command line) switch virtual consoles while within X? Since I upgraded X on my laptop resume from suspend has been a little flaky. But if I make sure I run 'zzz' from within a text virtual terminal the laptop has (so far) always resumed correctly. I could create ~/bin/zzz which checks to see if I'm in X and refuses to run, but it would be even nicer if I could have it automatically switch to a virtual console for me, and then run /usr/sbin/zzz. I'm aware of 'vidcontrol -s ', and if I run that from a virtual terminal it works. However, if I run it within X it refuses to work, printing: vidcontrol: must be on a virtual console: Inappropriate ioctl for device Is there a way around this restriction? N From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 21:37:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A7516A488; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from mx.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431904427A; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:09:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (unknown [192.168.3.18]) by mx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09572D48B9; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id DA29811420; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:09:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:09:13 -0400 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Mike Jakubik Message-ID: <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , Julian Elischer , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:37:22 -0000 --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: [...] > >the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata" >=20 > Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't= =20 > tell me these will be shoved under the rug. Send patches. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEY6f4h9pcDSc1mlERAmhCAJ9hNGmAUOdfPfAlUXsY+xesK8DXIwCfTseG L1eXjxYaj1iINI4ZeSOLEZk= =chsM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 21:53:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C800D16A5B9 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladgalu@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E6E43D83 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladgalu@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so380771pye for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:52:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=MprKliPFjUYqau5TNzXvw4g9MM1IofyIcUVSgFi43ktuEfD+e8MX30eXyIxIOuD1loE0CSHar5goH3Yv+Hy9LpDAuUtjbuF4zDRRaicwoG8JZfoe0f0AKnq45XUIvA0rv0FoPjscfdWRhlMfniMtRnSr5+b9IUquKmF5iWNWZd8= Received: by 10.35.112.3 with SMTP id p3mr1715772pym; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.34.3 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <79722fad0605111452r2e5da097x21aa86a63e4dfe52@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:52:51 +0300 From: "Vlad GALU" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: 6.1-stable crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:53:30 -0000 FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Mon May 8 08:07:42 EEST 2006 -- cut here -- #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 No locals. #1 0xc05790a4 in boot (howto=3D260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:402 first_buf_printf =3D 1 #2 0xc05796b9 in panic (fmt=3D0xc072598e "%s") at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:558 bootopt =3D 260 newpanic =3D 0 buf =3D "page fault", '\0' #3 0xc06fe7da in trap_fatal (frame=3D0xe6a146fc, eva=3D28) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:836 code =3D 40 type =3D 12 ss =3D 40 esp =3D 0 softseg =3D {ssd_base =3D 0, ssd_limit =3D 1048575, ssd_type =3D 27= , ssd_dpl =3D 0, ssd_p =3D 1, ssd_xx =3D 0, ssd_xx1 =3D 0, ssd_def32 =3D 1, ssd_gran =3D 1} msg =3D 0x0 #4 0xc06fea6a in trap_pfault (frame=3D0xe6a146fc, usermode=3D0, eva=3D28) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:744 va =3D 0 vm =3D (struct vmspace *) 0x0 map =3D 0xc078e820 rv =3D 1 ftype =3D 1 '\001' p =3D (struct proc *) 0x0 #5 0xc06fee9d in trap (frame=3D {tf_fs =3D -894238712, tf_es =3D -631767000, tf_ds =3D -632618968, tf_edi =3D 0, tf_esi =3D -632586744, tf_ebp =3D -425638048, tf_isp =3D -425638104, tf_ebx =3D 120, tf_edx =3D -968598912, tf_ecx =3D 71721784, tf_eax =3D 4, tf_trapno =3D 12, tf_err =3D 2, tf_eip =3D -1067665410 , tf_cs =3D 32, tf_eflags =3D 66050, tf_esp =3D -894216688, tf_ss =3D -425638048}) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:434 p =3D (struct proc *) 0xc7a8ac48 sticks =3D 1 i =3D 0 ucode =3D 0 type =3D 12 code =3D 2 eva =3D 28 #6 0xc06ecf2a in calltrap () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:139 No locals. #7 0xc05cb7fe in vfs_setdirty (bp=3D0xda4b7e08) at atomic.h:146 i =3D 120 object =3D 0x0 #8 0xc05d019b in bdwrite (bp=3D0xda4b7e08) at ../../../kern/vfs_bio.c:955 vp =3D (struct vnode *) 0xcab35550 nbp =3D (struct buf *) 0x78 bo =3D (struct bufobj *) 0xcab35610 #9 0xc0691a0c in ffs_write (ap=3D0xe6a1495c) at ../../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops= .c:722 vp =3D (struct vnode *) 0xcab35550 uio =3D (struct uio *) 0xe6a1497c ip =3D (struct inode *) 0xcad3dbdc fs =3D (struct fs *) 0xc7b86000 bp =3D (struct buf *) 0xda4b7e08 td =3D (struct thread *) 0x0 lbn =3D 120 osize =3D 7402056 seqcount =3D 127 blkoffset =3D 0 error =3D 0 flags =3D 2130771968 ioflag =3D 8323104 resid =3D 20480 size =3D 4 xfersize =3D 4096 #10 0xc07099c9 in VOP_WRITE_APV (vop=3D0xc0776f60, a=3D0xe6a1495c) at vnode= _if.c:698 rc =3D -1065914528 va =3D {va_type =3D 582, va_mode =3D 48536, va_nlink =3D -15867, va_uid =3D 3869329612, va_gid =3D 3228278790, va_fsid =3D 3255156120, va_fileid =3D -425637708, va_size =3D 13864983694757939440, va_blocksize =3D -457615776, va_atime =3D { tv_sec =3D -1039811176, tv_nsec =3D -1040198032}, va_mtime =3D {tv_sec = =3D -1050462640, tv_nsec =3D -968598912}, va_ctime =3D { tv_sec =3D 49353, tv_nsec =3D 0}, va_birthtime =3D {tv_sec =3D -1056643520, tv_nsec =3D 0}, va_gen =3D 3400750416, va_flags =3D 16, va_rdev =3D 16, va_bytes =3D 13865489573185931644, va_filerev =3D 14606111821807447904, va_vaflags =3D 3400750416, va_spare =3D 9} osize =3D 0 ooffset =3D 0 noffset =3D -968598912 #11 0xc06c1d4d in vnode_pager_generic_putpages (vp=3D0xcab35550, m=3D0xe6a14a90, bytecount=3D4, flags=3D8, rtvals=3D0xe6a14a40) at vnode_if.h:372 i =3D 4 object =3D 0xcd781ce4 count =3D 5 maxsize =3D 20480 ncount =3D 5 poffset =3D 1949696 auio =3D {uio_iov =3D 0xe6a14954, uio_iovcnt =3D 1, uio_offset =3D 1970176, uio_resid =3D 0, uio_segflg =3D UIO_NOCOPY, uio_rw =3D UIO_WRITE, uio_td =3D 0x0} aiov =3D {iov_base =3D 0x5000, iov_len =3D 0} ioflags =3D 71721784 ppscheck =3D 0 lastfail =3D {tv_sec =3D 0, tv_usec =3D 0} curfail =3D 0 #12 0xc05d58fa in vop_stdputpages (ap=3D0xc6445a80) at ../../../kern/vfs_default.c:486 No locals. #13 0xc0709348 in VOP_PUTPAGES_APV (vop=3D0x4, a=3D0x4466338) at vnode_if.c= :2164 rc =3D 4 #14 0xc06c1b97 in vnode_pager_putpages (object=3D0xcd781ce4, m=3D0x4, count=3D20480, sync=3D8, rtvals=3D0x4) at vnode_if.h:1119 vp =3D (struct vnode *) 0xcab35550 #15 0xc06bb67b in vm_pageout_flush (mc=3D0xe6a14a90, count=3D5, flags=3D8) at vm_pager.h:147 object =3D 0xcd781ce4 pageout_status =3D {5, 5} numpagedout =3D 0 i =3D 4 #16 0xc06b5d0c in vm_object_page_collect_flush (object=3D0xcd781ce4, p=3D0xc30d9e30, curgeneration=3D0, pagerflags=3D8) at ../../../vm/vm_object.c:950 tp =3D 0x5 runlen =3D 5 maxf =3D 4 chkb =3D 12 maxb =3D 0 i =3D 0 pi =3D 476 maf =3D {0xc11bd778, 0xc119b2c0} mab =3D {0x0, 0xe6a14b2c} ma =3D {0xc30d9e30, 0xc11bd778} #17 0xc06b60d9 in vm_object_page_clean (object=3D0xcd781ce4, start=3D0, end=3DUnhandled dwarf expression opcode 0x93 ) at ../../../vm/vm_object.c:834 n =3D 4 p =3D 0xc30d9e30 np =3D 0xc11bd778 tend =3D 1808 pi =3D Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0x93 (kgdb) --=20 If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 23:00:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A6016A5DE for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348E044064 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:30:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k4BMUd6j008292; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:30:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:30:39 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Nik Clayton Message-ID: <20060511223038.GF76653@dan.emsphone.com> References: <44630A5B.2030906@ngo.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44630A5B.2030906@ngo.org.uk> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching virtual consoles from within X X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:01:23 -0000 In the last episode (May 11), Nik Clayton said: > Is it possible to (from the command line) switch virtual consoles while > within X? > > Since I upgraded X on my laptop resume from suspend has been a little > flaky. But if I make sure I run 'zzz' from within a text virtual terminal > the laptop has (so far) always resumed correctly. > > I could create ~/bin/zzz which checks to see if I'm in X and refuses to > run, but it would be even nicer if I could have it automatically switch to > a virtual console for me, and then run /usr/sbin/zzz. > > I'm aware of 'vidcontrol -s ', and if I run that from a virtual terminal > it works. However, if I run it within X it refuses to work, printing: > > vidcontrol: must be on a virtual console: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > Is there a way around this restriction? Redirect stdin from a vty: vidcontrol -s 1 < /dev/ttyv0 If you're not root you'll either need to specify a vty you are logged in on, or wrap it in a sudo call. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 11 23:01:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C962916A6CA for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amarat@ksu.ru) Received: from ksu.ru (mail.ksu.ru [193.232.252.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662A9442BB for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:34:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amarat@ksu.ru) X-Pass-Through: Kazan State University Network Received: from [194.85.245.161] (zealot.ksu.ru [194.85.245.161]) by ksu.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4BMOEuj028244 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:24:15 +0400 Message-ID: <4463B96E.80600@ksu.ru> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 02:23:42 +0400 From: "Marat N.Afanasyev" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060214 X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Problem with console while trying to upgrade to 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:01:41 -0000 I've encountered a problem while trying to upgrade from 5.4-p8 to 6.1. My machine is placed in data-center, so I only have access to vnc-based KVM to grab the console. With 5.4 I have no problem, but when I try to boot 6.1 kernel it simply shows no information about loading process and I have no way to single boot. It seems that something in vidconsole prevents interaction with user at boot process. After entering multi-user console again works fine. I have no idea what to do. Any information concerning machine and KVM I use will be provided. -- SY, Marat From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 01:14:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AA016A4BF for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A4074418A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 00:53:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 52778 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 00:53:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Gi5n4hWvwvTAnF3go3oyPKvFDRFjN0c5rGHuieZOuZ+jzSnnAV4qRvdC9q3OfZjf0gxqYOxhe3xuUTpmNY7edNZ94CQ/dXWlCuDSkVccfofTAGiZtC+ADK1OI1Nowz8GG64HElbn3rVAuBgL/PJVIeiao4CcVxfjRTSiMSjdZZY= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 00:53:18 -0000 Message-ID: <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:53:42 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Simon L. Nielsen" References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:14:16 -0000 Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > >> Julian Elischer wrote: >> > [...] > >>> the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata" >>> >> Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't >> tell me these will be shoved under the rug. >> > > Send patches. > Patches? For what? It's too late now, 6.1 has been released. I sent reminders to the RE team and i made it quite clear on the lists that the quota issue should be described in the relnotes/errata before the release. If the RE team chooses to ignore major bugs and pretend all is fine and dandy, then there is not much patches will do. Heck, im still waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems, as he so graciously offered, but couldn't deliver. I offered to work with him and provide help, he never replied to my emails. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 01:24:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941A816A403 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from needacoder@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62C843D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:24:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from needacoder@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y25so263432nfb for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:24:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=KbbrRQPDcoFgQ8k9Am2OYKj7zytplx07up+vcudt8dHhpCCuBAk6t5lMC3m1TjJw8xLs+/417wik19TvEl4rEsV05WEROODSBYo9GaidQKgyeAYaFfpEnr8senklSqRmeVhqX8EUWIVVPiZb7nZcTWAheH3NOM/qKrYSvLwz6ls= Received: by 10.49.88.14 with SMTP id q14mr953197nfl; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.75.2 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 17:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1e4841eb0605111757t36fdf8cfv267799a17dffc650@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 From: "m m" To: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:24:34 -0000 I am writing in regard to PR at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dbin%2F59552 . I am experienci= ng behavior on 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #11: Sun Mar 26 00:03:52 EST 2006 which looks a lot like something that would be caused by this PR. This happens when apache-1.3 processes that run with Mason code receive a SIGUSR1 (when newsyslog does log rotation) and apache gracefully kills off all processes when restarting. The following is the stack trace that lead me to this PR: > #0 0x00000000 in ?? () > #1 0x2949dad8 in ?? () > #2 0x294a02c4 in ?? () > #3 0x281ca708 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #4 0xbfbfe708 in ?? () > #5 0x28196556 in endhostent () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #6 0x2949ed4c in ?? () > #7 0x280a9980 in ?? () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #8 0x280a9878 in ?? () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #9 0xbfbfe718 in ?? () > #10 0x2808d5ef in find_symdef () from /libexec/ld- elf.so.1 > #11 0x2808da7c in find_symdef () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #12 0x281ba09a in __cxa_finalize () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #13 0x281b9d9a in exit () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #14 0x0805cd5b in clean_child_exit (code=3D692716228) at http_main.c:522 > #15 0x0805e707 in just_die (sig=3D30) at http_main.c:3202 > #16 0x0805e72a in usr1_handler (sig=3D692716228) at http_main.c:3212 > #17 0xbfbfffb4 in ?? () > #18 0x0000001e in ?? () > #19 0x00000000 in ?? () > #20 0xbfbfe7e0 in ?? () > #21 0x00000002 in ?? () > #22 0x0805e710 in just_die () at http_main.c:3202 > #23 0x0805fdae in child_main (child_num_arg=3D692716228) at http_main.c:4= 571 > #24 0x0806046e in make_child (s=3D0x294a02c4, slot=3D0, now=3D0) at > http_main.c:5051 > #25 0x080604f8 in startup_children (number_to_start=3D5) at http_main.c:5= 078 > #26 0x08060b11 in standalone_main (argc=3D2, argv=3D0xbfbfeca0) at > http_main.c:5410 > #27 0x08061392 in main (argc=3D2, argv=3D0xbfbfeca0) at http_main.c:5767 Please let me know if you have any thoughts on the subject or if this is completely unrelated problem. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 01:29:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E13C16A411 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEDA43D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:29:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so434552pya for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:29:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eNx1jKQNdi5D4c8nWHCngKxRocBpU+F7BM2A6f0+WNEgDaYvcukMDy6EXITejHP3eDzhKe7d/pA0TN3qynBPaMxphxpwlBHoSmExhQmGluNCrMKUQIK3xWiX17N9O9pM+pIWuItFZn46EzPYprJDM1o4Fa7nm1EN9hJhiu+4tUM= Received: by 10.35.107.20 with SMTP id j20mr1877733pym; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.114.11 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57d710000605111829g4cc3ebe7x553f96d195e2ff60@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:29:27 -0700 From: "pete wright" To: "m m" In-Reply-To: <1e4841eb0605111757t36fdf8cfv267799a17dffc650@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1e4841eb0605111757t36fdf8cfv267799a17dffc650@mail.gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:29:38 -0000 On 5/11/06, m m wrote: > I am writing in regard to PR at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dbin%2F59552 . I am experien= cing > behavior on 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #11: Sun Mar 26 00:03:5= 2 > EST 2006 which looks a lot like something that would be caused by this PR= . > This happens when apache-1.3 processes that run with Mason code receive a > SIGUSR1 (when newsyslog does log rotation) and apache gracefully kills of= f > all processes when restarting. The following is the stack trace that lea= d > me to this PR: > Are you able to reproduce this panic on 6.1-RELEASE? -pete --=20 ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 01:47:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C0E16A402 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from aaron.protected-networks.net (aaron.protected-networks.net [202.12.127.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B44643D58 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:46:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD4EC3F1; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:46:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from aaron.protected-networks.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6D9C393; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:46:51 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: aaron.protected-networks.net from=imb@protected-networks.net; domainkey=pass Received: from aaron.protected-networks.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A24C373; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:46:51 -0400 (EDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=200509; d=protected-networks.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Jb+YVwxmxEo0Kxqs+HkuuyJ+VEi1Qq+l30HXMLKQBHh2C11t2hRiRLWZFXvFso7dsU2LH8qJFpWeFvFAubmRr2Es9mn69tFK6zmS/hD70fI5ZG3fbfMH/CAw9APPQOBP; Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-24-218-147-31.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.218.147.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Iain Michael Butler", Issuer "Protected Networks Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26FDC352; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:46:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4463E905.2080306@protected-networks.net> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:46:45 -0400 From: Michael Butler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: m m References: <1e4841eb0605111757t36fdf8cfv267799a17dffc650@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1e4841eb0605111757t36fdf8cfv267799a17dffc650@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:47:01 -0000 m m wrote: > I am writing in regard to PR at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F59552 . I am > experiencing > behavior on 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #11: Sun Mar 26 > 00:03:52 > EST 2006 which looks a lot like something that would be caused by this > PR. > This happens when apache-1.3 processes that run with Mason code receive a > SIGUSR1 (when newsyslog does log rotation) and apache gracefully kills > off > all processes when restarting. Would this explain the following segfaults on 6.1-stable? /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87211 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 6 /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87208 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 6 /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87210 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 6 /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87209 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 6 -- Michael Butler, CISSP Security Architect Protected Networks http://www.protected-networks.net From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 01:52:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9ADE16A40D; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from mx.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2F843D5F; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:52:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (unknown [192.168.3.18]) by mx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952872D48C4; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id 073361142D; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:52:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:52:27 -0400 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Mike Jakubik Message-ID: <20060512015226.GA1219@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:52:36 -0000 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2006.05.11 20:53:42 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > >On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > =20 > >>Julian Elischer wrote: > >> =20 > >[...] > > =20 > >>>the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata" > >>> =20 > >>Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don'= t=20 > >>tell me these will be shoved under the rug. > >> =20 > > > >Send patches. > > =20 >=20 > Patches? For what? [...] For the errata page, which was what the above text mentioned. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEY+pah9pcDSc1mlERAln3AKCCDiQEvhhJKVzYzWnyS5WohOSG+QCgsxhL 1oCggTbQqBC/M5wnfq81nHA= =nWq3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 02:31:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE94916A42C; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-5.paradise.net.nz (bm-5a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D334428C; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:31:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-5.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IZ4003V2SBWYL@linda-5.paradise.net.nz>; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:31:08 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-132.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.132]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79ED051CAE; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:31:07 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:30:51 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> To: Mike Jakubik Message-id: <4463F35B.5030404@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer , "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 02:31:37 -0000 Mike Jakubik wrote: > Patches? For what? It's too late now, 6.1 has been released. I sent > reminders to the RE team and i made it quite clear on the lists that the > quota issue should be described in the relnotes/errata before the > release. If the RE team chooses to ignore major bugs and pretend all is > fine and dandy, then there is not much patches will do. Heck, im still > waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems, as he so graciously > offered, but couldn't deliver. I offered to work with him and provide > help, he never replied to my emails. I'm almost afraid to enter into this discussion (puts on flame suit), but might it be better to gently encourage the re/development team to make some of these a priority for 6.2? (as that gives everyone more lead time, and in the end what we all want is FreeBSD to steadily improve). Cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 03:36:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6BD16A404 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1293743D55 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:36:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: (qmail 90831 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 03:36:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noackjr@supercrime.org@24.99.22.177 with login) by smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 03:36:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AF06182; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:36:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at noacks.org Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id um6lr56GIMZE; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:36:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA0A6125; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:36:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4C3aY0I049871; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:36:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:36:27 -0400 From: Jonathan Noack User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jakubik References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=991D8195; url=http://www.noacks.org/cert/noackjr.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF23BB998577E8F8579DD6EB7" Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer , "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 03:36:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF23BB998577E8F8579DD6EB7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/11/06 20:53, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Simon L. Nielsen wrote: >> On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>> the above points to a filel that says "6.0 errata" >>>> >>> Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? >>> Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug. >> >> Send patches. > > Patches? For what? It's too late now, 6.1 has been released. I sent > reminders to the RE team and i made it quite clear on the lists that th= e > quota issue should be described in the relnotes/errata before the > release. If the RE team chooses to ignore major bugs and pretend all is= > fine and dandy, then there is not much patches will do. Heck, im still > waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems, as he so graciously > offered, but couldn't deliver. I offered to work with him and provide > help, he never replied to my emails. The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it. So, you're still waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems and he couldn't deliver? Huh? I quote you (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-May/025209.html):= "Scott, thanks for the very generous gesture, but i cant ask you something like this." -Jonathan --=20 Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 --------------enigF23BB998577E8F8579DD6EB7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZALCUFz01pkdgZURAoRHAJ9HV5r/GdlU60qOJ+vjqSuKpMqtoQCgoFZo 4Wi4kNuoAuyEJv9hMdrNWy4= =+Shc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF23BB998577E8F8579DD6EB7-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 03:42:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB05C16A4E3 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBA6C43D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 03:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 65929 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 03:42:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nXPPamT4ulHmYaitNVZY5AIIexYgmpbeLFe+EiSEy3spbSW3GbEad6uzGL0SP9N+wdYZJ/XRNrKPuPiOo3fpfmM1OnNPg3uItmGcHX4Qx4CcVqhfdNW9EaaZw9/9P14cZbxzcCHJ6orRYsFeCF/24IdJc2HxTMeYQhjiCtbqsto= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 03:42:01 -0000 Message-ID: <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:42:26 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer , "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 03:42:07 -0000 Jonathan Noack wrote: > The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't > some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" > thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est > la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of > the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it. > > How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release notes, not some on line version. > So, you're still waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems and he > couldn't deliver? Huh? I quote you > (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-May/025209.html): > "Scott, thanks for the very generous gesture, but i cant ask you > something like this." > He emailed me personally, i accepted his help offer, never heard from him since. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 04:12:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC73A16A40E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from needacoder@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FAA43D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:12:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from needacoder@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x29so274268nfb for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 21:12:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ICAUCzcUxdwFWRMCTrmJ30/nc5u2EILuJ8x/fDjwe19prMtbu1qrjmMW6gz0ru9npImV7c1fx4+FLus1AVEl9WYtbfihm8lDaNebF9bm0/FYjDCuqSUbFDkomPt49cGTAD+708/6ORTk2SkQHd7GTXWfg0OA+X1P4AQMJCwGP6M= Received: by 10.49.88.14 with SMTP id q14mr994123nfl; Thu, 11 May 2006 19:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.75.2 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 19:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1e4841eb0605111917p510dd92fhaf92de1c1b5bb6c3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:17:23 -0400 From: "m m" To: "Michael Butler" In-Reply-To: <4463E905.2080306@protected-networks.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1e4841eb0605111757t36fdf8cfv267799a17dffc650@mail.gmail.com> <4463E905.2080306@protected-networks.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 04:12:35 -0000 On 5/11/06, Michael Butler wrote: > > /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87211 (httpd), > uid 80: exited on signal 6 > /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87208 (httpd), > uid 80: exited on signal 6 > /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87210 (httpd), > uid 80: exited on signal 6 > /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87209 (httpd), > uid 80: exited on signal 6 That is the exact message that lead us to investigate this problem. I am rebuilding 6.1-stable, but I guess this is sufficient confirmation that "yes, it still happens with 6.1-release and on..." From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 05:22:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E677216A403; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F70643D45; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:22:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4C5M177013198; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:22:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <44641B79.9000300@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:22:01 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jakubik References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@freebsd.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" , Julian Elischer Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 05:22:17 -0000 Mike Jakubik wrote: > Jonathan Noack wrote: > >> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't >> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" >> thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est >> la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of >> the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it. >> >> > > > How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release > notes, not some on line version. > >> So, you're still waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems and he >> couldn't deliver? Huh? I quote you >> (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-May/025209.html): >> "Scott, thanks for the very generous gesture, but i cant ask you >> something like this." >> > > > He emailed me personally, i accepted his help offer, never heard from > him since. > Sorry, things got lost in the shuffle to get this released. For your specific snapshot deadlocks, please test the changes that have gone into 7-CURRENT and report back if they fix your problem. Only with active testing will we know if they are good to be backported in time for 6.2. Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 05:28:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635AB16A400; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfarmer@goldsword.com) Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B157443D45; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:28:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfarmer@goldsword.com) Received: from ibm70aec.bellsouth.net ([65.13.105.239]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060512052856.BUOE9063.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm70aec.bellsouth.net>; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:28:56 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.33] (really [65.13.105.239]) by ibm70aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060512052856.ETX4378.ibm70aec.bellsouth.net@[192.168.1.33]>; Fri, 12 May 2006 01:28:56 -0400 Message-ID: <44641D1C.2070106@goldsword.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 01:29:00 -0400 From: "J. T. farmer" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Hackers , stable@freebsd.org References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 05:28:58 -0000 Mike Jakubik wrote: > Jonathan Noack wrote: >> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't >> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" >> thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est >> la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of >> the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update >> it. > How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release > notes, not some on line version. *Plonk* You've just entered into my "do not read" bucket. If you can't see that errors occur, then I pity _anyone_ who codes for you... Or perhaps you never make a mistake. That must be it. John ------------------------------------------------------------------ John T. Farmer Owner & CTO GoldSword Systems jfarmer@goldsword.com 865-691-6498 Knoxville TN Consulting, Design, & Development of Networks & Software From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 06:03:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A85316A403 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidn@datalinktech.com.au) Received: from mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony3.iinet.net.au (ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony3.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B218C44026 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:03:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidn@datalinktech.com.au) Received: from 203-206-162-119.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO mail.datalinktech.com.au) ([203.206.162.119]) by mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony3.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 12 May 2006 13:57:54 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,118,1146412800"; d="scan'208"; a="777811928:sNHT6517669704" Received: from [192.168.4.232] ([192.168.4.232]) by mail.datalinktech.com.au with esmtp; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:57:50 +1000 id 0018D8DE.446423DE.0000E2C8 Message-ID: <446423D0.8040509@datalinktech.com.au> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:57:36 +1000 From: David Nugent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060406 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. T. farmer" References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> <44641D1C.2070106@goldsword.com> In-Reply-To: <44641D1C.2070106@goldsword.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 06:03:09 -0000 J. T. farmer wrote: > Mike Jakubik wrote: > >> Jonathan Noack wrote: >> >>> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't >>> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" >>> thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est >>> la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date >>> version of >>> the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update >>> it. >> >> How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release >> notes, not some on line version. > > *Plonk* > > You've just entered into my "do not read" bucket. If you can't see > that errors occur, then I pity _anyone_ who codes for you... Or > perhaps you never make a mistake. That must be it. While I tend to agree with regards to poor attitude (see similar threads in almost any open source forum on the topic of "demanding" anything from a volunteer project), Mike is obviously quite passionate about and has the interests of FreeBSD at heart, and for that I cannot blame him at all. He seems to have a disagreement with handling of the release process, which is the same recurring issue every time there is a release and probably the #1 cause of burnout with the Release Engineer of the day. Historically, you can see that the current process works though, even if it may not produce the 100% perfect -RELEASE it at least guards against more serious problems that have happened in the past that were introduced by last minute and untested changes. Regards, David PS: cc -hackers removed From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 07:20:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1AC16A402 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from smtp1.uct.ac.za (smtp1.uct.ac.za [137.158.128.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3363F4406C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:20:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from anubis.uct.ac.za ([137.158.128.125]) by smtp1.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1FeRwj-00008z-JI for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:20:21 +0200 Received: from lhc.phy.uct.ac.za ([137.158.37.93]) by anubis.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FeRwj-000BKa-D4 for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:20:21 +0200 Received: from lordcow by lhc.phy.uct.ac.za with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeRwj-0005pS-Fs for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:20:21 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:20:21 +0200 From: gareth To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512072021.GA22237@lordcow.org> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20060510073107.GA19897@lordcow.org> <20060510102222.GA25464@lordcow.org> <446206DF.7020607@alumni.rice.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <446206DF.7020607@alumni.rice.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 Cc: Subject: Re: portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:20:57 -0000 On Wed 2006-05-10 (11:29), Jonathan Noack wrote: > You are probably experiencing some of the VFS limitations in 5.3 (you'll > be pleasantly surprised by 6.1!). "portsdb -Uu" is very CPU and IO > intensive; it takes a long time on a fast machine. "make fetchindex" is > provided as a replacement for having to run "portsdb -Uu". The only > downside is that the downloaded INDEX-5.db may be a few hours out of date. it looks like 'make fetchindex' only gets INDEX-5.bz2, then unzips it, then i need to make a INDEX-5.db. anyway, 'portsdb -Uu' may be CPU/IO intensive, but that alone shouldn't be powering down the machine? > > but, if i just run portversion, it creates the INDEX-5.db, > > so i'm not sure why i'm running 'portsdb -Uu' in the first > > place? > > I would highly recommend checking out portsnap; it builds an up-to-date > INDEX-5.db file automatically as part of the update process. so what is 'portversion' building, that is different to what 'portsdb -Uu' would do? thanx re portsnap, will have a look but can't at the moment. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 08:13:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568F916A401 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB80A43D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 May 2006 08:13:44 -0000 Received: from p50911DB3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO m2a2.dyndns.org) [80.145.29.179] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 12 May 2006 10:13:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F0C200BDB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:13:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (m2a2.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08377-17 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:13:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id D4FC5200C07; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:13:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Matthias Andree To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> (Mike Jakubik's message of "Thu, 11 May 2006 23:42:26 -0400") References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:13:41 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110005 (No Gnus v0.5) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at emma.line.org X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:13:47 -0000 Mike Jakubik writes: > Jonathan Noack wrote: >> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't >> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" >> thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est >> la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of >> the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it. >> >> > > How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release > notes, not some on line version. You lost connection to the ground, Mike. Come back please :-) People make mistakes, and that applies to both the code as to the documentation, and users will know that sometimes problems will be found only after the release so they'll check online later when running into a problem. The 6.1 release announcement already mentioned the errata lapsus BTW and asked people to check on-line, so it appears someone's asking for perfection -- but it was decided months ago to stick to a schedule rather than making perfect releases. Having said that, 6.1 is a real and visible improvement over 6.0 for me. 6.1 is usable, where 6.0 toppled over every few minutes (I'm talking about ral(4) and other nasty stuff such as tmpfs/mdmfs panics in 6.0 - ral(4) is what prompted me to do the 5.4->6.0 upgrade). -- Matthias Andree From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 09:21:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89CA16A401; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:21:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (xbsd.org [82.233.2.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4248A43D48; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:21:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317B9115B5; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:21:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72640-05; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:21:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mayday.esat.net (mayday.esat.net [193.95.134.156]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C19114BF; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:21:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Florent Thoumie To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wCJ6S9MqOM6wLbfll70R" Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:21:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1147425701.27355.15.camel@mayday.esat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Jail testers needed (rc.d/jail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:22:00 -0000 --=-wCJ6S9MqOM6wLbfll70R Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey lists, Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. The symptoms are: - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and have at least one jail configured, this one is harmless. - a problem with one of the following variable: jail_exec, jail_exec_start, jail_exec_stop, jail_flags and especially jail_fstab; if you have at least two jails configured. I committed yesterday a fix that should supposedly fix both of these issues so I'd need all jail users running either FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE or 6-STABLE (older than two days) to try the new script [1] and report the result, either successful or not. Once I'll get enough successful reports, I'll contact the Release Engineering team to make sure the patch makes it to the RELENG_6_1 branch. Sorry for the inconvenience. Note: Keep me CC'ed as I'm not (yet) subscribed to these lists. [1] http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/etc/rc.d/jail?rev=3D1.32 --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --=-wCJ6S9MqOM6wLbfll70R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEZFOlMxEkbVFH3PQRAvdMAJ4mIEOmucmo/JyHMnBLNBe2kEvpNQCdGLxg NIhLD7QFOM5edSe2KP58oKQ= =u69l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wCJ6S9MqOM6wLbfll70R-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 11:16:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F3116A404; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:16:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (aun50.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.21.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAC043D46; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:16:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CBFwuC084584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 May 2006 13:16:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <44646E67.1010308@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:15:51 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060424) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florent Thoumie References: <1147425701.27355.15.camel@mayday.esat.net> In-Reply-To: <1147425701.27355.15.camel@mayday.esat.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFAAC5ED35B16A254D52073DB" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.2/1459/Thu May 11 22:46:49 2006 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jail testers needed (rc.d/jail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:16:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFAAC5ED35B16A254D52073DB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/05/2006 11:21, Florent Thoumie wrote: > Hey lists, >=20 > Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD > 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. >=20 > The symptoms are: >=20 > - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and > have at least one jail configured, this one is harmless. > - a problem with one of the following variable: jail_exec, > jail_exec_start, jail_exec_stop, jail_flags and especially jail_fstab; > if you have at least two jails configured. >=20 > I committed yesterday a fix that should supposedly fix both of these > issues so I'd need all jail users running either FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE or= > 6-STABLE (older than two days) to try the new script [1] and report the= > result, either successful or not. Once I'll get enough successful > reports, I'll contact the Release Engineering team to make sure the > patch makes it to the RELENG_6_1 branch. > > Sorry for the inconvenience. > > Note: Keep me CC'ed as I'm not (yet) subscribed to these lists. > > [1] http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/etc/rc.d/jail?rev=3D1.32 Success on 6.1-RELEASE. I've got 2 jails and was hit by the first issue (ifconfig one). With rc.d/jail rev=3D1.32 all works fine (rc.conf jails setup below). Let me know if you need more informations. Thanks! Karol /etc/rc.conf: ifconfig_rl2_alias1=3D"inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffffff" ifconfig_rl2_alias2=3D"inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xffffffff" jail_enable=3D"YES" jail_set_hostname_allow=3D"NO" jail_list=3D"apache ssh" jail_apache_rootdir=3D"/data/jails/10.0.0.1" jail_apache_hostname=3D"www.my.server" jail_apache_ip=3D"10.0.0.1" jail_apache_exec=3D"/bin/sh /etc/rc" jail_apache_devfs_enable=3D"YES" jail_apache_fdescfs_enable=3D"NO" jail_apache_procfs_enable=3D"NO" jail_ssh_rootdir=3D"/data/jails/10.0.0.2" jail_ssh_hostname=3D"ssh.my.server" jail_ssh_ip=3D"10.0.0.2" jail_ssh_exec=3D"/bin/sh /etc/rc" jail_ssh_devfs_enable=3D"YES" jail_ssh_fdescfs_enable=3D"NO" jail_ssh_procfs_enable=3D"NO" --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enigFAAC5ED35B16A254D52073DB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEZG5uezeoPAwGIYsRAq3cAJ9B64jbuRN2U00j532ZohnoHge7eACdF9Te zhLHLbbcEEih45XCAhDH3Xs= =53fG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFAAC5ED35B16A254D52073DB-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 11:31:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185A416A410 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 710EE43D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: (qmail 96178 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 11:31:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noackjr@supercrime.org@24.99.22.177 with login) by smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 11:31:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EAF61E7; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:31:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at noacks.org Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UJSZPu3HIs6L; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:31:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A459B6114; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:31:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CBVH3V052301; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:31:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <446471FF.30001@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:31:11 -0400 From: Jonathan Noack User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gareth References: <20060510073107.GA19897@lordcow.org> <20060510102222.GA25464@lordcow.org> <446206DF.7020607@alumni.rice.edu> <20060512072021.GA22237@lordcow.org> In-Reply-To: <20060512072021.GA22237@lordcow.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=991D8195; url=http://www.noacks.org/cert/noackjr.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3420F3EBFB6EBBE9AAF83AE2" Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3420F3EBFB6EBBE9AAF83AE2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/12/06 03:20, gareth wrote: > On Wed 2006-05-10 (11:29), Jonathan Noack wrote: >> You are probably experiencing some of the VFS limitations in 5.3 (you'= ll >> be pleasantly surprised by 6.1!). "portsdb -Uu" is very CPU and IO >> intensive; it takes a long time on a fast machine. "make fetchindex" = is >> provided as a replacement for having to run "portsdb -Uu". The only >> downside is that the downloaded INDEX-5.db may be a few hours out of d= ate. >=20 > it looks like 'make fetchindex' only gets INDEX-5.bz2, then unzips it, > then i need to make a INDEX-5.db. anyway, 'portsdb -Uu' may be > CPU/IO intensive, but that alone shouldn't be powering down the machine= ? Ah, I made a mistake in my explanation. Replace INDEX-5.db with INDEX-5. Sorry for the confusion... "make fetchindex" downloads the INDEX-x file (where 'x' is the major release number of the version of FreeBSD you are using -- in this case '5'). When this file is newer than INDEX-x.db, the portupgrade tools will automatically build an updated version of INDEX-x.db. As such, it is not necessary to do anything further than "make fetchindex". Building INDEX-x takes forever (and may be overheating your machine causing freezes/reboots), but building INDEX-x.db is quite fast. If you want to make sure everything is updated with a single command, replace the '-U' with '-F' for "portsdb -Fu" (hehe -- I love it when arguments work out like that...). That will 1) download the INDEX-x file instead of building it from scratch, and then 2) build an updated INDEX-x.db. Here's how long it takes on my 6.1-RELEASE server (dual Pentium3): $ time portsdb -Fu Fetching the ports index ... done [Updating the portsdb in /usr/build ... - 14630 port entries found =2E........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000......= =2E..6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11= 000.........12000.........13000.........14000...... =2E.... done] real 0m17.378s user 0m14.691s sys 0m1.936s $ >>> but, if i just run portversion, it creates the INDEX-5.db, >>> so i'm not sure why i'm running 'portsdb -Uu' in the first >>> place? >> I would highly recommend checking out portsnap; it builds an up-to-dat= e >> INDEX-5.db file automatically as part of the update process. >=20 > so what is 'portversion' building, that is different to what 'portsdb -= Uu' > would do? thanx re portsnap, will have a look but can't at the moment. Correction: portsnap automatically builds an up-to-date INDEX-x, not INDEX-5.db. "portversion" is building the INDEX-x.db file from INDEX-x. See the portsdb(1) man page for more info. -Jonathan --=20 Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 --------------enig3420F3EBFB6EBBE9AAF83AE2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZHIFUFz01pkdgZURAj5JAJ46nHrap3XfSDptnRXrcet4XGBcMACg0vDi YxaULKHch3rk3T+EfKwRQLo= =oO/i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3420F3EBFB6EBBE9AAF83AE2-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 11:57:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E05B16A403 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from smtp1.uct.ac.za (smtp1.uct.ac.za [137.158.128.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AE343D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:57:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from anubis.uct.ac.za ([137.158.128.125]) by smtp1.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1FeWGO-000HOx-1Z for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:56:56 +0200 Received: from lhc.phy.uct.ac.za ([137.158.37.93]) by anubis.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FeWGN-000BkL-MJ for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:56:55 +0200 Received: from lordcow by lhc.phy.uct.ac.za with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeWGN-0001bH-Eu for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:56:55 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:56:55 +0200 From: gareth To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512115655.GA4628@lordcow.org> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20060510073107.GA19897@lordcow.org> <20060510102222.GA25464@lordcow.org> <446206DF.7020607@alumni.rice.edu> <20060512072021.GA22237@lordcow.org> <446471FF.30001@alumni.rice.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <446471FF.30001@alumni.rice.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 Cc: Subject: Re: portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:57:34 -0000 On Fri 2006-05-12 (07:31), Jonathan Noack wrote: > Ah, I made a mistake in my explanation. Replace INDEX-5.db with > INDEX-5. Sorry for the confusion... > > "make fetchindex" downloads the INDEX-x file (where 'x' is the major > release number of the version of FreeBSD you are using -- in this case > '5'). When this file is newer than INDEX-x.db, the portupgrade tools > will automatically build an updated version of INDEX-x.db. As such, it > is not necessary to do anything further than "make fetchindex". > Building INDEX-x takes forever (and may be overheating your machine > causing freezes/reboots), but building INDEX-x.db is quite fast. > > If you want to make sure everything is updated with a single command, > replace the '-U' with '-F' for "portsdb -Fu" (hehe -- I love it when > arguments work out like that...). That will 1) download the INDEX-x > file instead of building it from scratch, and then 2) build an updated > INDEX-x.db. > > Correction: portsnap automatically builds an up-to-date INDEX-x, not > INDEX-5.db. "portversion" is building the INDEX-x.db file from INDEX-x. ah ok, thanx that's much clearer now. so for interest's sake: 'portsdb -F' is the same as 'make fetchindex', and 'portsdb -u' is the same as the first part of 'portversion' right? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 12:08:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD5416A5AA for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 440E943D6A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:08:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: (qmail 10229 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 12:08:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noackjr@supercrime.org@24.99.22.177 with login) by smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 12:08:48 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C15E6143; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:08:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at noacks.org Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gqiB+N7Z5jpv; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:08:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F195260D4; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:08:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4CC8kfq000890; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:08:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <44647AC9.100@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:08:41 -0400 From: Jonathan Noack User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gareth References: <20060510073107.GA19897@lordcow.org> <20060510102222.GA25464@lordcow.org> <446206DF.7020607@alumni.rice.edu> <20060512072021.GA22237@lordcow.org> <446471FF.30001@alumni.rice.edu> <20060512115655.GA4628@lordcow.org> In-Reply-To: <20060512115655.GA4628@lordcow.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=991D8195; url=http://www.noacks.org/cert/noackjr.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4077E84E23F166349FCBC55D" Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:08:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4077E84E23F166349FCBC55D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/12/06 07:56, gareth wrote: > On Fri 2006-05-12 (07:31), Jonathan Noack wrote: >> Ah, I made a mistake in my explanation. Replace INDEX-5.db with >> INDEX-5. Sorry for the confusion... >> >> "make fetchindex" downloads the INDEX-x file (where 'x' is the major >> release number of the version of FreeBSD you are using -- in this case= >> '5'). When this file is newer than INDEX-x.db, the portupgrade tools >> will automatically build an updated version of INDEX-x.db. As such, i= t >> is not necessary to do anything further than "make fetchindex". >> Building INDEX-x takes forever (and may be overheating your machine >> causing freezes/reboots), but building INDEX-x.db is quite fast. >> >> If you want to make sure everything is updated with a single command, >> replace the '-U' with '-F' for "portsdb -Fu" (hehe -- I love it when >> arguments work out like that...). That will 1) download the INDEX-x >> file instead of building it from scratch, and then 2) build an updated= >> INDEX-x.db. >> >> Correction: portsnap automatically builds an up-to-date INDEX-x, not >> INDEX-5.db. "portversion" is building the INDEX-x.db file from INDEX-= x. >=20 > ah ok, thanx that's much clearer now. >=20 > so for interest's sake: >=20 > 'portsdb -F' is the same as 'make fetchindex', and Yes. > 'portsdb -u' is the same as the first part of 'portversion' Yes, but using '-u' is not necessary. From the portsdb(1) man page description of the '-u' option: "Note: the ports database file is automatically updated if it is not up-to-date when looked up, so manual updating is not mandatory." I use '-u' only when I share /usr/ports between machines via NFS. Because I don't want them fighting over updating the INDEX-x.db file, I run "portsdb -Fu" when I update /usr/ports so that all machines have a fresh version. -Jonathan --=20 Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 --------------enig4077E84E23F166349FCBC55D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZHrOUFz01pkdgZURAtd6AKCrYsukwHEKheTt5lfqfIovcW2PQACgl5Be ICgjutnr1CW1lbIprSlzapc= =lqE2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4077E84E23F166349FCBC55D-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 12:54:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B2C16A408 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D801243D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so536155pya for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:53:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KNMW1xHmtTigrMfHfG01ZLUSxSTCkNM4mZ196zW4RZTaHRMsfPvT5kfPYDVCdKEYdOXRNFiiqzxM4iRnHpHMOsS+mn4RCgVro2pDbs5j/VARyqx7v4Hd0gu99hP/7yTs3i4K/AIO2cod022G9SJQbgNMtZuSDbHXbUCJgMg0FkI= Received: by 10.35.131.4 with SMTP id i4mr1730688pyn; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.29.20 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0605120553i2ccc0b6es8901e15a5ab83318@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:53:58 +0100 From: Chris To: "Matthias Andree" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:54:04 -0000 On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree wrote: > Mike Jakubik writes: > > > Jonathan Noack wrote: > >> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't > >> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" > >> thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'es= t > >> la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version = of > >> the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it= . > >> > >> > > > > How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release > > notes, not some on line version. > > You lost connection to the ground, Mike. Come back please :-) > > People make mistakes, and that applies to both the code as to the > documentation, and users will know that sometimes problems will be found > only after the release so they'll check online later when running into a > problem. The 6.1 release announcement already mentioned the errata > lapsus BTW and asked people to check on-line, so it appears someone's > asking for perfection -- but it was decided months ago to stick to a > schedule rather than making perfect releases. > > Having said that, 6.1 is a real and visible improvement over 6.0 for me. > 6.1 is usable, where 6.0 toppled over every few minutes (I'm talking > about ral(4) and other nasty stuff such as tmpfs/mdmfs panics in 6.0 - > ral(4) is what prompted me to do the 5.4->6.0 upgrade). > > -- > Matthias Andree agreed whilst 6.1 isnt bug free lets not forget its a massive improvement over 6.0 in terms of stability, I still havent seen a lockup/crash on any of my 6.1 servers and they are all prerelease. It did shock me tho they didnt simply repackage the 6.1 release with updated errata notes it will look amatuerish to have outdated notes in the package. Chris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 12:58:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD9F16A403 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0903B43D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:58:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so536945pya for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:58:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Sf7S8KfBQ82cyJBNdjnnOx6Mqka07vtq9s8ffZNafR7Ph0FKJYjdp9iqq9VcN/fIT1oh6oDnbP5Q8S+LRLSpPaSJlWpqeUvH1ZugCkfs5OrsWyciL5YGc0CJ++IzgCJXEOLLZDgh9ybc5mxxBgBh0e36aKCLqFIPacSitF2uE4A= Received: by 10.35.54.20 with SMTP id g20mr2485042pyk; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.29.20 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0605120558j391ad122sc762975b5b603cdb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:58:10 +0100 From: Chris To: "Mark Linimon" In-Reply-To: <20060511153601.GA4689@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com> <20060505192152.GA17616@soaustin.net> <3aaaa3a0605061326n2f18e38epf6b93f2042385cec@mail.gmail.com> <445D55D9.5070701@samsco.org> <3aaaa3a0605071216m5fa3b38fu7c1afde22dd5e2e0@mail.gmail.com> <20060511153601.GA4689@soaustin.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:58:11 -0000 On 11/05/06, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:16:42PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > GNATS didnt reply so I will send the info about email address I used > > and see if I can find the pr number as well. > > Any problems you have with GNATS not responding, please email them to > bugmaster@FreeBSD.org and we'll try to figure out what's going on. > > > I will have to on my 5.4 server's to 5.5 since 5.4 is EOL end of May. > > I think we just extended the 5.4 support time to match 5.3. 5.4 is so > superior to 5.3 that we'd really rather people be on it. OTOH we've > already committed to support 5.3 for N more months and there it is. > > mcl > ahh thats cool, good stuff :) Chris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 14:07:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1698616A41A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1D343D4C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4CE6qbC016121; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:06:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4464967C.50707@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:06:52 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> <3aaaa3a0605120553i2ccc0b6es8901e15a5ab83318@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0605120553i2ccc0b6es8901e15a5ab83318@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Matthias Andree , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:07:00 -0000 Chris wrote: > On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree wrote: > >> Mike Jakubik writes: >> >> > Jonathan Noack wrote: >> >> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't >> >> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" >> >> thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. >> C'est >> >> la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date >> version of >> >> the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update >> it. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release >> > notes, not some on line version. >> >> You lost connection to the ground, Mike. Come back please :-) >> >> People make mistakes, and that applies to both the code as to the >> documentation, and users will know that sometimes problems will be found >> only after the release so they'll check online later when running into a >> problem. The 6.1 release announcement already mentioned the errata >> lapsus BTW and asked people to check on-line, so it appears someone's >> asking for perfection -- but it was decided months ago to stick to a >> schedule rather than making perfect releases. >> >> Having said that, 6.1 is a real and visible improvement over 6.0 for me. >> 6.1 is usable, where 6.0 toppled over every few minutes (I'm talking >> about ral(4) and other nasty stuff such as tmpfs/mdmfs panics in 6.0 - >> ral(4) is what prompted me to do the 5.4->6.0 upgrade). >> >> -- >> Matthias Andree > > > agreed whilst 6.1 isnt bug free lets not forget its a massive > improvement over 6.0 in terms of stability, I still havent seen a > lockup/crash on any of my 6.1 servers and they are all prerelease. > > It did shock me tho they didnt simply repackage the 6.1 release with > updated errata notes it will look amatuerish to have outdated notes in > the package. > > Chris We didn't discover it until the last minute, and repackaging takes 3 days. Scott From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 15:52:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA3416A68D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88F0443D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:52:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 90198 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 15:52:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pJthMmfj9H13wIEqPJvVQR9v3Qn0ZF3ZsahBtLHRuOtDS0/fOO3sWVie5xdvFPzyjZc5P6Nxar/rcPZAKAI4/pBwDXNVTcwIAo9teiuwLixOoE7tYcTbR3T5GlXdcDbop3JDpOlGtTMadZPC8Eqw8jdUhs3iuldg/ghHsPkazgQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 15:52:13 -0000 Message-ID: <4464AF4B.1050607@rogers.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:52:43 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> <44641B79.9000300@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <44641B79.9000300@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:52:18 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Sorry, things got lost in the shuffle to get this released. For your > specific snapshot deadlocks, please test the changes that have gone into > 7-CURRENT and report back if they fix your problem. Only with active > testing will we know if they are good to be backported in time for 6.2. I'll install -CURRENT on a test box and give it a whirl, will report back soon. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 16:13:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BED16A5D3; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:13:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2176343DEC; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:12:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from egypt.therub.org (therub.org [209.98.146.43]) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C085A83C2; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:12:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: by egypt.therub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7CAA745659B; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:12:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:12:25 -0500 From: Dan Rue To: Florent Thoumie Message-ID: <20060512161225.GM42385@therub.org> References: <1147425701.27355.15.camel@mayday.esat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1147425701.27355.15.camel@mayday.esat.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Jail testers needed (rc.d/jail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:13:06 -0000 On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:21:41AM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: > Hey lists, > > Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD > 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. > > The symptoms are: > > - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and > have at least one jail configured, this one is harmless. > - a problem with one of the following variable: jail_exec, > jail_exec_start, jail_exec_stop, jail_flags and especially jail_fstab; > if you have at least two jails configured. > > I committed yesterday a fix that should supposedly fix both of these > issues so I'd need all jail users running either FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE or > 6-STABLE (older than two days) to try the new script [1] and report the > result, either successful or not. Once I'll get enough successful > reports, I'll contact the Release Engineering team to make sure the > patch makes it to the RELENG_6_1 branch. I hit both the ifconfig issue and an issue where rc.d/jail would not start all of my defined jails. Both issues appear to be fixed with the latest version of jail from CVS. Thanks! Dan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:34:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8262716AC8D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from needacoder@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18A143D53 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:34:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from needacoder@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so70670nfa for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:34:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cmjbS0WNPmW8M/0ajllMy6WJtW+ngdlt9TEiwax+Gz3FWYRZ0wvd7oFfdDxHShGVvJAo9fwnBD5cqN1hVsf0Zn79eTJdHnib/jhk2cdn+DD7z3jP9CdXoX6JI1drkahzytkV0uJrCDwSGmEFWHXjjgRTAXl9JEoLhIaB6Fcj4dQ= Received: by 10.48.31.8 with SMTP id e8mr175710nfe; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.75.2 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1e4841eb0605121050o380a5ef9gb0219c82851ed3b5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:50:05 -0400 From: "m m" To: "Maxim Konovalov" , "Florent Thoumie" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060512132452.C35412@mp2.macomnet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060512132452.C35412@mp2.macomnet.net> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/97166 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:34:25 -0000 > Hey lists, > > Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD > 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. > > The symptoms are: > > - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and > have at least one jail configured, this one is harmless. > - a problem with one of the following variable: jail_exec, > jail_exec_start, jail_exec_stop, jail_flags and especially jail_fstab; > if you have at least two jails configured. > > I committed yesterday a fix that should supposedly fix both of these > issues so I'd need all jail users running either FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE or > 6-STABLE (older than two days) to try the new script [1] and report the > result, either successful or not. Once I'll get enough successful > reports, I'll contact the Release Engineering team to make sure the > patch makes it to the RELENG_6_1 branch. > > Sorry for the inconvenience. > > Note: Keep me CC'ed as I'm not (yet) subscribed to these lists. > > [1] http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/etc/rc.d/jail?rev=3D1.32 Appears to be working fine on releng_6 from last night - Thank you very muc= h! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 19:42:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75D416ADDF; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukas@razik.de) Received: from fmmailgate07.web.de (fmmailgate07.web.de [217.72.192.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC7B43D5A; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukas@razik.de) Received: by fmmailgate07.web.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/webde Linux 0.7) with SMTP id k4CJghDs014071; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:42:43 +0200 Received: from [84.63.14.89] by freemailng5302.web.de with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:42:43 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:42:43 +0200 Message-Id: <481807733@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Lukas Razik To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-i386@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: fm-user Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ X-Sender: lukasrazik@web.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Fasttrak TX4310 RAID controller with FreeBSD-6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:42:50 -0000 Hello! I've bought a Promise FastTrak TX4310 because I thought that it will be supported by FreeBSD's ata/ar driver...: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ata&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.0-stable&format=html I've updated the controller's BIOS to the newest available v2.5.1.3116: http://www.promise.com/support/download/download2_eng.asp?productID=165&category=all&os=100 And there are two Seagate ST3300622AS connected to the controller with RAID0. But if I boot from a 6.1-RELEASE-i386-disc then I only get an ad6 and an ad10 device and no arX device... :-((( So I can't use them in RAID0 mode... Can anyone of you help me? Best regards, Lukas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:00:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACC016B9C6 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.200.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE90543D4C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-6-134-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.134.233]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20060512200045012006atcue>; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:00:46 +0000 Message-ID: <4464E96C.7010806@bfoz.net> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:00:44 -0700 From: Brandon Fosdick User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060507) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: builtin openssl and debugging? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:00:47 -0000 How do I rebuild the builtin openssl with debugging symbols? I thought I could simply edit /usr/src/crypto/openssl/Makefile and then run make from the same directory, but that doesn't seem to work. Is there some way to do this w/o rebuilding world? Using the port isn't an option since I need to test against the version in the src tree. Thanks From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:09:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1200516ADDC for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3469E43D6E for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:09:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k4CK9JK0066674; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:09:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:09:19 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Brandon Fosdick Message-ID: <20060512200918.GA63786@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4464E96C.7010806@bfoz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464E96C.7010806@bfoz.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: builtin openssl and debugging? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:09:28 -0000 In the last episode (May 12), Brandon Fosdick said: > How do I rebuild the builtin openssl with debugging symbols? I > thought I could simply edit /usr/src/crypto/openssl/Makefile and then > run make from the same directory, but that doesn't seem to work. Is > there some way to do this w/o rebuilding world? /usr/src/crypto is like /usr/src/contrib ; just a repository for 3rd-party sources. You'll want to go to /usr/src/secure to build the openssl libs and binaries. > Using the port isn't an option since I need to test against the > version in the src tree. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:26:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7265116A44A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2F643D53 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:26:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CKPwjT034024; Fri, 12 May 2006 23:25:58 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:25:58 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:26:13 -0000 Hello! On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>> makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin > I don't know, it needs to be tested in your particular case. I've built another kernel, adding back makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin options QUOTA Results are almost the same as w/o these 2 options. So the following overhead difference: >>>> %Sys %Intr %Idl >>>> RELENG_6 + rl0 45 40 15 >>>> RELENG_6 + fxp0 45 35 20 > >> %Sys %Intr %Idl "time md5 -t" wall clock time >> RELENG_6 + rl0 34 24 42 1:43 >> RELENG_6 + fxp0 30 20 50 1:40 is caused by just these: options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT >> (I'll try to find out which one of these takes which % of overhead when I >> get free time), but still much worse then under RELENG_4, where this >> particular (I'd say "quote common") usage pattern takes 24-28% of CPU time, >> while under RELENG_5 / 6 it takes >= 50% ;( > > Thanks. Silly question: the data transfer rate is the same on both > 4.x and 6.x, right? i.e. the data transfer itself takes the same > time? Yes. I'm transferring a large file (ISO image) from another (much faster, lightly loaded) machine over 10Mbit/s Ethernet link, so the transfer itself is limited only by the wire speed (actual transfer rate is very close to 1000 KBytes/sec according to ftp client and 'systat -vm 1' disk transfer rate in every measurement). > The next step is for you to run some profiling tests to see > where the kernel is spending time, e.g. with hwpmc. I have to get myself familiar with this new (for me) feature first... Also, hwpmc doesn't exist in RELENG_4, so it'll be impossible to compare results with RELENG_4. It's a pity, because my tests clearly show that main loss of performance (growth of overhead) occured during RELENG_4 -> 5 transition. And last, but not least: my test system (Transcend TS-ABX31A motherboard based on Intel BX chipset) does not provide APIC, will hwpmc be useful in this situation? > Also, when you are trying to quantify performance differences, you > need to run many copies of the test (at least 10) under identical > conditions to account for possible variations. The ministat tool > (/usr/src/tools/tools/ministat) is good for performing statistically > meaningful comparisons of data sets when you have them. As my transfer takes much time (say 10 minutes) I've observed % of time used many times during the transfer - they don't vary more than +/- several (2-3) % during the main transfer phase (when transfer speed is stable). My "time md5 -t" runs was used only as a confirmation that systat's numbers are trustworthy - they simply confirm that there are _much_ less CPU cycles available for application under RELENG_5/6 than under RELENG_4 (under identical load pattern). I ran "time md5 -t" several (3-5 times) just to confirm my assumptions, and results didn't vary more than 3%. So I suppose that ministat isn't necessary in my tests. > Kris Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 20:32:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C6B16A8F4; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987A443D5E; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:32:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4CKWih4039134; Fri, 12 May 2006 23:32:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:32:44 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: <20060502181118.M92256@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: <20060512232806.Q35558@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060502181118.M92256@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 20:32:52 -0000 Hello! On Tue, 2 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: >> options INVARIANTS >> options INVARIANT_SUPPORT > > In FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x, the INVARIANTS option has been significantly > expanded to test a much larger set of invariants, and also incorporate kernel > use-after-free checking, which involves memory scrubbing. This is great for > catching bugs, but it will have a significant performance impact, especially > for kernel-intensive loads. So maybe it's time to add, say, options INVARIANTS_EXTENDED for these new and expensive checks, and leave only basic and cheap (yet effective for bug hunting) asserts enabled when only options INVARIANTS is defined? > Robert N M Watson Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 21:14:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D536E16AE94 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2113543D6A for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:13:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) by lara.cc.fer.hr (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4CLDnYj087489 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 23:13:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Message-ID: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:13:49 +0200 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050921) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: pagezero again X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:14:22 -0000 Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to have gotten worse - now it *always* takes ~25-30% CPU, and my "System" time stat shows it (its almost always ~30%). From what I can understand, pagezero thread fills kernel's pool of zeroed pages. This looks non-threteaning, but what would cause such high demand of zeroed pages on my system? The number of processes is almost constant, there are no frequent process spawnings or forks (top shows "last pid" to be almost constant). FastCGI processes communicate over UNIX sockets. Also, pagezero thread is (should be) executing at idle priority - does this mean it won't interfere much with machine's performance? Even if "0% idle" is not uncommon state? (This is FreeBSD 6.1-R, 2CPU SMP). From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 21:27:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4205D16B1BD for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladgalu@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402F943D93 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladgalu@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so650629pya for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:27:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UHrirUZLbAsP93XhqRor4R01i3DU1Om7ImVXfcj7ztmGoSXv34591CmzWgYqgPyWuPFfaM48B2nGGQpovg0BEWD52fHqsc1G4HGryh39ak7widwWSb54RdxiNrJplI3sjBWNRszK+jg8ReKEnxngP7D+CQwgV9oUTgx+Bg3n0Bo= Received: by 10.35.15.11 with SMTP id s11mr288866pyi; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.34.3 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <79722fad0605121427r7bc00f16k979e0bc3ecc2084a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:27:38 +0300 From: "Vlad GALU" To: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> Cc: Subject: Re: pagezero again X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:27:54 -0000 On 5/13/06, Ivan Voras wrote: > Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes > (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very > busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured > apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to have > gotten worse - now it *always* takes ~25-30% CPU, and my "System" time > stat shows it (its almost always ~30%). > > From what I can understand, pagezero thread fills kernel's pool of > zeroed pages. This looks non-threteaning, but what would cause such high > demand of zeroed pages on my system? The number of processes is almost > constant, there are no frequent process spawnings or forks (top shows > "last pid" to be almost constant). FastCGI processes communicate over > UNIX sockets. > > Also, pagezero thread is (should be) executing at idle priority - does > this mean it won't interfere much with machine's performance? Even if > "0% idle" is not uncommon state? > How is the system, swapping-wise ? --=20 If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 22:07:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C0116AB5F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 22:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A252243D46 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 22:07:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) by lara.cc.fer.hr (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4CM7MVG087632; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:07:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Message-ID: <4465071A.8040106@fer.hr> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:07:22 +0200 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050921) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vlad GALU References: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> <79722fad0605121427r7bc00f16k979e0bc3ecc2084a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <79722fad0605121427r7bc00f16k979e0bc3ecc2084a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pagezero again X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 22:07:31 -0000 Vlad GALU wrote: > How is the system, swapping-wise ? Good: no swapping, 100+ MB free memory. Free memory varies between ~90 and ~110 MB - maybe something is returning memory to the OS and reclaiming it too often? (looking at top, it could be php-cgi, but is there a way to precisely track it? can it be stopped externally to the process?) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 22:14:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A5016A5C4 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 22:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111D043D45 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 22:14:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BEB5CE2; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:14:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MRtQzc8hPHD0; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:14:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-160-235-217.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.235.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD3B5C9C; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:14:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <446508B6.4000305@mac.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:14:14 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pagezero again X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 22:14:18 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes > (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very > busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've > reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem > seems to have gotten worse - now it *always* takes ~25-30% CPU, and my > "System" time stat shows it (its almost always ~30%). > > From what I can understand, pagezero thread fills kernel's pool of > zeroed pages. This looks non-threteaning, but what would cause such > high demand of zeroed pages on my system? Generally, a whole bunch of processes that are demanding a lot or memory and/or swapping would do it. What does "vmstat 1" look like...? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 22:41:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC2116A63C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 22:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A16243D73 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 22:41:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 70431 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 22:41:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=A2xFZg3bLj0BmaZMJe4x9tv0SK0e203HN9LAZiYzOnKSNmSiHad8BS6yocSoqO01llbscOrIcU4VsAoXpRDVnw3TX+roTehXxrx9AibAwVyfo1sJf3wbopyjl167dJW+BPXxowZxxi1hgUs8sqWcTw26/yevUfetXunl5QINdsM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 22:41:44 -0000 Message-ID: <44650F49.3060200@rogers.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:42:17 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Kirchner References: <20060502171853.GG753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <44579EE1.6010300@rogers.com> <20060502180557.GA91762@xor.obsecurity.org> <4457A02C.9040408@rogers.com> <20060502182302.GA92027@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060503110503.O58458@fledge.watson.org> <35c231bf0605031821s582b6d03j3ee9d434a596f62a@mail.gmail.com> <20060504014241.GA38346@xor.obsecurity.org> <35c231bf0605032005n4fe38769v9637a9393efb791a@mail.gmail.com> <20060504100110.P17611@fledge.watson.org> <35c231bf0605041659m2d90e50y9026f18af592f9f5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <35c231bf0605041659m2d90e50y9026f18af592f9f5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 22:41:53 -0000 David Kirchner wrote: > Here's how to reproduce the snapshot deadlock I'm seeing, with 6.1-RC2 > cvsup'd as of 5 or 6 hours ago: > > [...] > > It locks up every time for me, with no further disk activity. > Unfortunately, for some reason, my server console became unaccessable, > so I'm not able to get to the kdb prompt. If I can get to it later, > what should I run other than "show lockedvnodes" and "show threads"? > Also, can anyone else try these steps and verify if they cause the > same problem for you? I just tried it on todays current, the process completes fine. No lockups or panics. This is on a dual p3 Dell 2400 with a raid 5 array on a PERC 2/Si (aac). From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 00:21:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0341F16A7E2 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:21:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fb-stable@psconsult.nl) Received: from mx0.psconsult.nl (ps226.psconsult.nl [213.222.19.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD65243D48 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:21:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fb-stable@psconsult.nl) Received: from phuket.psconsult.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phuket.psconsult.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4D000YR025579 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 02:00:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fb-stable@psconsult.nl) Received: (from paul@localhost) by phuket.psconsult.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k4CNxx2o025568 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 02:00:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fb-stable@psconsult.nl) X-Authentication-Warning: phuket.psconsult.nl: paul set sender to fb-stable@psconsult.nl using -f Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 01:59:59 +0200 From: Paul Schenkeveld To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512235959.GA18154@psconsult.nl> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Reproducable file corruption on 6-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:21:10 -0000 Hello, When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the copy is not equal to te source file. This behaviour can be reproduced repeatedly. Details: - FreeBSD 6-STABLE, cvsupped yesterday - Intel L440GX+ main board, dual 700 MHz Pentium 3, 1 GB RAM - 2x Promise TX3 IDE controllers - 4x Hitachi HDS725050KLAT80 harddisks (500GB each) These disks are mirrored using gvinum as two 500GB volumes: drive disk0 device /dev/ad4s1e drive disk1 device /dev/ad6s1e drive disk2 device /dev/ad8s1e drive disk3 device /dev/ad10s1e volume vol0 plex org concat sd length 0 drive disk0 plex org concat sd length 0 drive disk2 volume vol1 plex org concat sd length 0 drive disk1 plex org concat sd length 0 drive disk3 Other filesystems are on SCSI disks. # sum /data/vol1/some_7GB_file 19249 6990148 /data/vol1/some_7GB_file # cp -p /data/vol1/some_7GB_file /data/vol0/tmp.1 # sum /data/vol0/tmp.1 54291 6990148 /data/vol0/tmp.1 # cp -p /data/vol1/some_7GB_file /data/vol0/tmp.2 # sum /data/vol0/tmp.2 46435 6990148 /data/vol0/tmp.2 # cp -p /data/vol1/some_7GB_file /data/vol0/tmp.3 # sum /data/vol0/tmp.3 53090 6990148 /data/vol0/tmp.3 # cp -p /data/vol1/some_7GB_file /data/vol0/tmp.4 # sum /data/vol0/tmp.4 63059 6990148 /data/vol0/tmp.4 # cp -p /data/vol1/some_7GB_file /data/vol2/tmp.5 # sum /data/vol2/tmp.5 44188 6990148 /data/vol2/tmp.5 No errors in dmesg. Checksums are the same when repeating the sum command later so the problem occurs during copy, not during read-back. When I first copy the file from /data/vol1 to a filesystem on a pair of SCSI disks and then to /data/vol2 from the SCSI disks I get a correct copy. Relevant dmesg output: pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 15.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib2 atapci0: port 0x3030-0x3037,0x3024-0x3027,0x3028-0x302f,0x3020-0x3023,0x3000-0x300f mem 0xf4200000-0xf4203fff irq 20 at device 4.0 on pci2 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0x3048-0x304f,0x303c-0x303f,0x3040-0x3047,0x3038-0x303b,0x3010-0x301f mem 0xf4204000-0xf4207fff irq 23 at device 7.0 on pci2 ata4: on atapci1 ata5: on atapci1 ad4: 476940MB at ata2-master UDMA133 ad6: 476940MB at ata3-master UDMA133 ad8: 476940MB at ata4-master UDMA133 ad10: 476940MB at ata5-master UDMA133 Hope someone can shed a light on this. Regards, Paul Schenkeveld From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 00:31:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5829816A615 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:31:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yosimoto@waishi.jp) Received: from ns.waishi.jp (ns.waishi.jp [61.199.233.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B08F43D46 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yosimoto@waishi.jp) Received: from darwin.waishi.jp (darwin.waishi.jp [61.199.233.196]) by ns.waishi.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315E721101F for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:31:12 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:31:11 +0900 From: Shin-ichi Yoshimoto To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060513093111.911895.2748d3cc@waishi.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 (GMessage framework 1.3.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: WAISHI.JP X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.3.8 Cc: Subject: I can't use the mount_umapfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:31:14 -0000 Hi, all I tried to use mount_umapfs with RELENG_6, but I can't like this: # mount_umapfs -u umapfile -g gmapfile /home/yosimoto /mnt mount_umapfs: No such file or directory A umapfile and a gmapfile is folllowing: # cat umapfile 1 1001 501 # cat gmapfile 1 1001 501 # ls -al total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 yosimoto users 512 May 12 04:10 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 May 12 21:16 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 11 May 12 04:06 gmapfile -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 11 May 12 04:09 umapfile Is the mistake found in this way$B!!(B? --- Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 00:51:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB7316A436 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB50843D45 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 00:51:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.193] (host113.thm10.resonet.uottawa.ca [137.122.74.113]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589411A4E3C; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44652D88.1070408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 02:51:20 +0200 From: Suleiman Souhlal User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051204) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pagezero again X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 00:51:38 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes > (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very > busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured > apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to have > gotten worse - now it *always* takes ~25-30% CPU, and my "System" time > stat shows it (its almost always ~30%). > > From what I can understand, pagezero thread fills kernel's pool of > zeroed pages. This looks non-threteaning, but what would cause such high > demand of zeroed pages on my system? The number of processes is almost > constant, there are no frequent process spawnings or forks (top shows > "last pid" to be almost constant). FastCGI processes communicate over > UNIX sockets. > > Also, pagezero thread is (should be) executing at idle priority - does > this mean it won't interfere much with machine's performance? Even if > "0% idle" is not uncommon state? > > (This is FreeBSD 6.1-R, 2CPU SMP). Can you give the output of top(1)? Until this is fixed, you can disable pagezero with sysctl vm.idlezero_enable=0. -- Suleiman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 01:58:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF32616A402; Sat, 13 May 2006 01:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990F843D48; Sat, 13 May 2006 01:58:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8661A4E40; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C49051B01; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:58:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:58:09 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Message-ID: <20060513015809.GA18438@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060502181118.M92256@fledge.watson.org> <20060512232806.Q35558@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060512232806.Q35558@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 01:58:11 -0000 --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:32:44PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >=20 > Hello! >=20 > On Tue, 2 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: > >>options INVARIANTS > >>options INVARIANT_SUPPORT > > > >In FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x, the INVARIANTS option has been=20 > >significantly expanded to test a much larger set of invariants, and also= =20 > >incorporate kernel use-after-free checking, which involves memory=20 > >scrubbing. This is great for catching bugs, but it will have a=20 > >significant performance impact, especially for kernel-intensive loads. >=20 > So maybe it's time to add, say, >=20 > options INVARIANTS_EXTENDED >=20 > for these new and expensive checks, and leave only basic and cheap (yet > effective for bug hunting) asserts enabled when only >=20 > options INVARIANTS >=20 > is defined? No, they are all effective for bug hunting. You just need to be aware that it is incompatible with performance. Kris --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZT0xWry0BWjoQKURAsQxAKDQaF/Q7mL5aMt4a45MqKDmhgBP+wCg82BL nSYJ3OooAiLI8E4E8a15QLY= =ujRL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 02:00:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903D216A408 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 02:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4452843D4C for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 02:00:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283B21A4E43; Fri, 12 May 2006 19:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9341051A2C; Fri, 12 May 2006 22:00:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 22:00:51 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Message-ID: <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ftEhullJWpWg/VHq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 02:00:52 -0000 --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:25:58PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >=20 > Hello! >=20 > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>>>makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=3D-fno-builtin > >I don't know, it needs to be tested in your particular case. >=20 > I've built another kernel, adding back >=20 > makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=3D-fno-builtin > options QUOTA >=20 > Results are almost the same as w/o these 2 options. So the following=20 > overhead difference: >=20 > >>>> %Sys %Intr %Idl > >>>>RELENG_6 + rl0 45 40 15 > >>>>RELENG_6 + fxp0 45 35 20 > > > >> %Sys %Intr %Idl "time md5 -t" wall clock time > >>RELENG_6 + rl0 34 24 42 1:43 > >>RELENG_6 + fxp0 30 20 50 1:40 >=20 > is caused by just these: >=20 > options INVARIANTS > options INVARIANT_SUPPORT So what is the overall status? I am not clear what your results are. > As my transfer takes much time (say 10 minutes) I've observed % of time > used many times during the transfer - they don't vary more than +/- sever= al > (2-3) % during the main transfer phase (when transfer speed is stable). > My "time md5 -t" runs was used only as a confirmation that systat's numbe= rs > are trustworthy - they simply confirm that there are _much_ less CPU cycl= es > available for application under RELENG_5/6 than under RELENG_4 (under=20 > identical load pattern). I ran "time md5 -t" several (3-5 times) just to > confirm my assumptions, and results didn't vary more than 3%. So I suppose > that ministat isn't necessary in my tests. Perhaps not when the difference is large, but you need to be very careful when differences are below ~10%, because it's easy to make incorrect conclusions. Kris --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZT3TWry0BWjoQKURAgwqAJ0W2px8/9vpEUFd+urXk1umEgeH5wCg3a4h WgdyQvUc+HEHsEqgmrKm5c0= =94UA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 04:43:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AA816A403 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 04:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C986C43D53 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 04:43:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp223-61.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net [203.122.223.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4D4hLgS054277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 13 May 2006 14:13:22 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:13:08 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4518799.q9uSsS8TSe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605131413.17020.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Subject: Odd RS232 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 04:43:27 -0000 --nextPart4518799.q9uSsS8TSe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I am trying to talk to a high voltage power supply unit we're using at work, it uses RS232 and you can read back current, voltage, faults, etc.. What I have seems to work fine except that occassionally I get junk read ba= ck, strangely it appears the longer my program runs the more often I see corru= pt data. The program is written in Tcl and I'm using version 8.4, I have a test PC h= ere which is quite old (FreeBSD 4.mumble, Tcl 8.2) and it never sees any problems. I = am soon going to try an identical system to the one failing (6.0-STABLE) It's possible it could be the Tcl interpreter getting corrupted but IMO it'= s a very odd manifestation if so.. The serial card in it is.. puc0: port 0x9400-0x941f irq 18 at device 13.0 o= n pci0 sio4: on puc0 sio4: type 16550A sio4: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode sio5: on puc0 sio5: type 16550A sio5: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode So, apart from the actual program code everything else is different :) (Hopefully my next test will reduce the variable space a lot..) Any sugestions most welcome. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart4518799.q9uSsS8TSe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEZWPk5ZPcIHs/zowRAvwFAJ9MtFJ3w8Cx9PqyhN0/6C7oqOpSVACcDjlP sJ7uh3Kdvf9nckPRK0RB38w= =adxx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4518799.q9uSsS8TSe-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 05:59:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9C416A402 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB1143D46 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:59:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4D5x1sk087097; Sat, 13 May 2006 08:59:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 08:59:01 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 05:59:11 -0000 Hello! On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>>>> %Sys %Intr %Idl >>>>>> RELENG_6 + rl0 45 40 15 >>>>>> RELENG_6 + fxp0 45 35 20 >>> >>>> %Sys %Intr %Idl "time md5 -t" wall clock time >>>> RELENG_6 + rl0 34 24 42 1:43 >>>> RELENG_6 + fxp0 30 20 50 1:40 >> >> is caused by just these: >> >> options INVARIANTS >> options INVARIANT_SUPPORT > > So what is the overall status? I am not clear what your results are. Results for RELENG_6+rl0 are %Sys %Intr %Idl 34 24 42 without INVARIANTS, and %Sys %Intr %Idl 45 40 15 with them. Other options like QUOTA and "makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin" make almost no difference. So, under my test conditions, the best % of idle CPU time under RELENG_6 is 42%, while under RELENG_4 we had %Sys %Intr %Idl 14 14 72 under the same conditions (and with INVARIANTS!) ;( >> available for application under RELENG_5/6 than under RELENG_4 (under >> identical load pattern). I ran "time md5 -t" several (3-5 times) just to >> confirm my assumptions, and results didn't vary more than 3%. So I suppose >> that ministat isn't necessary in my tests. > > Perhaps not when the difference is large, but you need to be very > careful when differences are below ~10%, because it's easy to make > incorrect conclusions. I agree with you. I would make more measurements if my aim was to determine which branch between RELENG_5 and _6 to use. But as these results are close enough, and RELENG_6 is superiour regarding new features (and often stability), IMHO there's no point in using RELENG_5 at all. I'm just trying to understand why performance of RELENG_6 is worse than in RELENG_4 _that much_, and whether this sad situation can be improved somehow. > Kris Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 06:03:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C9F16A400; Sat, 13 May 2006 06:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA6343D45; Sat, 13 May 2006 06:03:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4D636B2090983; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:03:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:03:06 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060513015809.GA18438@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20060513085923.J74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060502181118.M92256@fledge.watson.org> <20060512232806.Q35558@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513015809.GA18438@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 06:03:09 -0000 Hello! On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> So maybe it's time to add, say, >> >> options INVARIANTS_EXTENDED >> >> for these new and expensive checks, and leave only basic and cheap (yet >> effective for bug hunting) asserts enabled when only >> >> options INVARIANTS >> >> is defined? > > No, they are all effective for bug hunting. You just need to be aware > that it is incompatible with performance. But, you know, many bugs can be hunted only under long-term production conditions, while incompatibility between INVARIANTS and performance effectively prevents successful bug hunting under these conditions, because performance is often critical in production. > Kris Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 06:55:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700D216A404 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 06:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-2.paradise.net.nz (bm-2a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071EE43D45 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 06:55:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-2.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IZ600KW9Z7YL8@linda-2.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 18:55:10 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-29-104.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.29.104]) by smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E34F7608BC; Sat, 13 May 2006 18:55:10 +1200 (NZST) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:55:08 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <20060512235959.GA18154@psconsult.nl> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <446582CC.4060506@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) References: <20060512235959.GA18154@psconsult.nl> Cc: Subject: Re: Reproducable file corruption on 6-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 06:55:52 -0000 Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > Hello, > > When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the > copy is not equal to te source file. This behaviour can be reproduced > repeatedly. > > Hope someone can shed a light on this. > I had a slot 1 board that exhibited a similar problem - changing the cpu heatsink so it didn't overhang the north bridge, cured the problem (i.e. letting the north bridge see some cool air). While the *cpu* heatsink may not be your problem, you might want to either check your chipset temperature(s), or install heatsinks on them (two promise cards in the 66Mhz PCI slots can shift quite a lot of data, if your working both of 'em!). Cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 07:01:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA74716A422 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 07:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D2D043D6D for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 07:01:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: (qmail 90191 invoked from network); 13 May 2006 07:01:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noackjr@supercrime.org@24.99.22.177 with login) by smtp101.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 May 2006 07:01:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024BF63A4; Sat, 13 May 2006 03:01:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at noacks.org Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id c3mx0oVVm3c6; Sat, 13 May 2006 03:01:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DD16202; Sat, 13 May 2006 03:01:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4D71Pal098987; Sat, 13 May 2006 03:01:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <4465843E.9070108@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 03:01:18 -0400 From: Jonathan Noack User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> In-Reply-To: <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=991D8195; url=http://www.noacks.org/cert/noackjr.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFDEE3FB92E6ADF2D3540A255" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:01:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFDEE3FB92E6ADF2D3540A255 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/13/06 01:59, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>>>>> %Sys %Intr %Idl >>>>>>> RELENG_6 + rl0 45 40 15 >>>>>>> RELENG_6 + fxp0 45 35 20 >>>> >>>>> %Sys %Intr %Idl "time md5 -t" wall clock time= >>>>> RELENG_6 + rl0 34 24 42 1:43 >>>>> RELENG_6 + fxp0 30 20 50 1:40 >>> >>> is caused by just these: >>> >>> options INVARIANTS >>> options INVARIANT_SUPPORT >> >> So what is the overall status? I am not clear what your results are. >=20 > Results for RELENG_6+rl0 are >=20 > %Sys %Intr %Idl > 34 24 42 >=20 > without INVARIANTS, and >=20 > %Sys %Intr %Idl > 45 40 15 >=20 > with them. Other options like QUOTA and "makeoptions > CONF_CFLAGS=3D-fno-builtin" make almost no difference. So, under my tes= t > conditions, the best % of idle CPU time under RELENG_6 is 42%, while > under RELENG_4 we had >=20 > %Sys %Intr %Idl > 14 14 72 >=20 > under the same conditions (and with INVARIANTS!) ;( >=20 >>> available for application under RELENG_5/6 than under RELENG_4 (under= >>> identical load pattern). I ran "time md5 -t" several (3-5 times) just= to >>> confirm my assumptions, and results didn't vary more than 3%. So I >>> suppose >>> that ministat isn't necessary in my tests. >> >> Perhaps not when the difference is large, but you need to be very >> careful when differences are below ~10%, because it's easy to make >> incorrect conclusions. >=20 > I agree with you. I would make more measurements if my aim was to > determine > which branch between RELENG_5 and _6 to use. But as these results are c= lose > enough, and RELENG_6 is superiour regarding new features (and often > stability), IMHO there's no point in using RELENG_5 at all. I'm just tr= ying > to understand why performance of RELENG_6 is worse than in RELENG_4 > _that much_, and whether this sad situation can be improved somehow. Have you tried putting I586_CPU in there? See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020696.ht= ml. Also, use the link0 option with your fxp cards if they support it. See the fxp(4) man page for more info. Here is an example /etc/rc.conf entry= : ifconfig_fxp0=3D"inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx link0" --=20 Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 --------------enigFDEE3FB92E6ADF2D3540A255 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZYRFUFz01pkdgZURArK7AKDAmfndjwh/aWzjTMOjyFKXJAfh0ACfSfD6 SUFJY7PEg2J12gKeWqnRick= =OyMc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFDEE3FB92E6ADF2D3540A255-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 09:45:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A082B16A400 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3039F43D46 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:45:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t11so496502wxc for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 02:45:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qq1Yd/sM30D+8PrYSTKqHynW/TuIFhDXjMV7QeaTCJiJ/f+WjZNWgaO1ksQFw/f7Qi7rVi0GH4bh2OZkHW7gOhh6OUxIG27gmn+A3krQXSuPu2vodHnRtkVwbPmBg3P/6kYGpoNenHTHMSiyJuaZ1cI12hDtR1q+IqOCUy247YE= Received: by 10.70.122.13 with SMTP id u13mr3300971wxc; Sat, 13 May 2006 02:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.117.13 with HTTP; Sat, 13 May 2006 02:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <84dead720605130245o4bb06c24s5e8d53f7d7f06b5b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:15:38 +0530 From: "Joseph Koshy" To: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: <200605131413.17020.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200605131413.17020.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd RS232 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:45:39 -0000 > I have a test PC here which > is quite old (FreeBSD 4.mumble, Tcl 8.2) and it never > sees any problems. I am soon going to try an identical system > to the one failing (6.0-STABLE) Have you checked if the PC's serial port adheres to RS232 specs? --=20 FreeBSD Developer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 10:06:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0621416A40A for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB8243D49 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:06:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp223-61.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net [203.122.223.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4DA6F7k060336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 13 May 2006 19:36:16 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "Joseph Koshy" Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:36:03 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605131413.17020.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <84dead720605130245o4bb06c24s5e8d53f7d7f06b5b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84dead720605130245o4bb06c24s5e8d53f7d7f06b5b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9036650.qbqq3PNozX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605131936.10938.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd RS232 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:06:23 -0000 --nextPart9036650.qbqq3PNozX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 13 May 2006 19:15, Joseph Koshy wrote: > > I have a test PC here which > > is quite old (FreeBSD 4.mumble, Tcl 8.2) and it never > > sees any problems. I am soon going to try an identical system > > to the one failing (6.0-STABLE) > > Have you checked if the PC's serial port adheres to RS232 specs? Not as such, although it is a bit difficult as the PC is rather remote :( (80 degrees north) I have another card of the same model here and I will also see if I can get= =20 someone on site to swap the cable with one of the onboard ports (used for t= he=20 UPS) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart9036650.qbqq3PNozX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEZa+S5ZPcIHs/zowRAlbTAKCGKF4ElWQGDLTUSeFfbDsqw3IQSACfVWfC zC5qxM4fBhIobKbA+XaplZc= =CSjm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9036650.qbqq3PNozX-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 10:27:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E36516A400 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:27:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakob@grimstveit.no) Received: from mail.hjemme.no (mail.hjemme.no [62.97.193.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B9A43D45 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:27:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jakob@grimstveit.no) Received: from grimstveit.no (79.62-97-240.bkkb.no [62.97.240.79]) by mail.hjemme.no (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4DARQhd031245; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:27:27 +0200 Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:27:26 +0200 From: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20060513122726.09608539@corona.grimstveit.no> In-Reply-To: <28451466@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <77d930220605101628h3d5300d8g54c54c6896f46855@mail.gmail.com> <28451466@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Organization: BitWise Computing X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p7 Face: 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 User-Agent: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.0 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: page fault on freshly installed 6.1 from cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:27:31 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote on Thu, 11 May 2006 09:46: > On Thu, 11 May 2006 01:28:29 +0200 Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote: >=20 >> Here is a transcript of what is shown on-screen before crash appears: >=20 >> nvidia0: mem >> 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xe8000000-oxeffffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff irq >> 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 >> WARNING: Device driver " >=20 > Did you install nvidia driver from ports? Then you should rebuild it. Correct, and thanks, this fixed it. Safe mode was not enough to boot up without the module, so I was very uncertain as to how I could recompile the culprit. Then I found the boot console where I could type in something along the lin= es of "disable-module nvidia" and then "boot-conf", which in turn continued booting the box without loading the "old" nvidia.ko-module. Reinstall of x11/nvidia-driver and a new reboot was what I needed to get back on track. Big thanks to Samorodov and the rest of this list! --=20 Jakob Breivik Grimstveit, , 48298152 Bes=F8k Newsergalleriet: "I hate quotations." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 11:30:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1239016A402 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 11:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from strick@covad.net) Received: from mail872.megamailservers.com (mail872.carrierinternetsolutions.com [69.49.106.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3000543D48 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 11:30:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from strick@covad.net) X-POP-User: strick.covad.net Received: from mist.nodomain (h-67-103-37-7.snfccasy.dynamic.covad.net [67.103.37.7]) by mail872.megamailservers.com (8.13.6/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4DBTxqc001701 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 07:30:00 -0400 Received: from mist.nodomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mist.nodomain (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4DBTxGe000980; Sat, 13 May 2006 04:29:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@mist.nodomain) Received: (from dan@localhost) by mist.nodomain (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k4DBTw4i000979; Sat, 13 May 2006 04:29:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 04:29:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Strick Message-Id: <200605131129.k4DBTw4i000979@mist.nodomain> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Cc: dan@mist.nodomain Subject: old program compatibility with FreeBSD 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:30:02 -0000 I just installed FreeBSD 6.1 and had no problems during the basic installation. I did a "Custom" install and seleced "All" in the "Choose Distributions" menu. When I attempt to run a program compiled on release 5.4 under release 6.1, the system complains that it cannot find libc.so.5. On my release 5.4 system, /usr/lib/compat contains old shared libraries. On my release 6.1 system, /usr/lib/compat contains only the aout subdirectory. Is this a bug in release 6.1? dan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 12:01:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C521316A4A7 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC7443D94 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:01:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) by lara.cc.fer.hr (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4DC1Fq6094650 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:01:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Message-ID: <4465CA8B.7000509@fer.hr> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:01:15 +0200 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050921) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org References: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> <44652D88.1070408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <44652D88.1070408@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: pagezero again X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:01:37 -0000 Suleiman Souhlal wrote: > Can you give the output of top(1)? Until this is fixed, you can disable > pagezero with sysctl vm.idlezero_enable=0. It's weekend so the load is not that great today: last pid: 39200; load averages: 0.94, 1.07, 1.06 up 3+19:07:24 13:55:38 131 processes: 4 running, 109 sleeping, 18 waiting CPU states: 46.7% user, 0.0% nice, 29.5% system, 1.5% interrupt, 22.2% idle Mem: 434M Active, 304M Inact, 203M Wired, 50M Cache, 111M Buf, 4912K Free Swap: 1500M Total, 88K Used, 1500M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 12 root 1 171 52 0K 8K RUN 0 57.2H 49.22% idle: cpu0 39165 www 1 114 0 64940K 32268K CPU1 0 0:12 40.58% php-cgi 11 root 1 171 52 0K 8K RUN 1 46.6H 36.43% idle: cpu1 39094 www 1 4 0 57680K 28872K accept 1 0:26 20.52% php-cgi 39 root 1 -44 -163 0K 8K pgzero 1 772:59 18.41% pagezero 39167 www 1 99 0 54108K 24220K select 1 0:03 9.44% php-cgi 38884 www 1 97 0 51684K 23936K select 1 1:16 7.52% php-cgi 39166 www 1 4 0 51436K 21564K accept 0 0:04 6.44% php-cgi Here's vmstat 1: procs memory page disks faults cpu r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr ad4 da0 in sy cs us sy id 2 2 0 839148 47488 9024 0 0 0 8961 7 0 0 553 4754 1600 28 15 57 1 2 0 839680 46116 21419 0 0 0 20770 0 2 0 528 5080 1473 55 27 18 1 2 0 840148 43624 20683 0 0 0 21434 0 0 0 486 4107 1278 52 29 19 3 2 0 840548 43212 19655 0 0 0 18947 0 0 0 720 16122 2083 48 36 17 2 2 0 840968 44204 19941 0 0 0 19963 0 4 0 771 7228 2172 52 29 19 0 3 0 836080 53200 10445 0 0 0 13591 0 35 0 590 7084 1893 27 24 49 1 2 0 828472 55124 224 0 0 0 543 0 3 3 687 9430 1996 10 4 86 1 2 0 832640 50928 269 0 0 0 12 0 13 2 592 3316 1826 10 3 87 2 2 0 835748 48336 5301 0 0 0 3970 0 0 0 623 8692 2052 32 14 54 1 2 0 838068 46288 21716 0 0 0 20882 0 2 0 598 7072 1658 50 30 19 3 2 0 839012 44284 22194 0 0 0 22233 0 2 1 301 1442 795 42 28 30 1 2 0 839788 44060 21738 0 0 0 21317 0 2 0 345 2853 930 45 30 25 1 2 0 840440 42844 21225 0 0 0 21095 0 0 0 518 4993 1333 51 30 20 1 2 0 841036 42244 22867 0 0 0 22862 0 2 0 344 1174 835 44 29 27 1 2 1 841572 41696 21294 0 0 0 21065 0 2 0 445 3639 1197 49 26 25 2 2 0 842044 41208 20025 0 0 0 20102 0 44 0 661 6631 1942 51 30 19 1 3 0 842480 40716 20717 0 0 0 20466 0 2 0 560 6790 1448 54 29 17 2 2 0 842900 40212 20760 0 0 0 20935 0 0 3 661 6669 1785 54 28 18 0 2 0 829828 53260 12530 0 0 0 15688 0 32 0 844 9203 2569 44 27 29 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 12:05:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B2D16A4F5 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.jedrasik@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FB843D76 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:05:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.jedrasik@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so145758nfa for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:05:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=q4b3IcnA7TwCPSe6GJA6mdNNMtq4F0ABro0i51g6jytq2EYoPLNWWGL/KNnYcFtaYlZr8rQTLZiLpL1exXIFNZhoLHW82KEJmCuxaBC4RWXkgOin60RdbV44BEB9/n7CGNzLpt0xZdLWQT1huMCa6m4Fj6lpPj1i0hjdjY+7yTQ= Received: by 10.48.254.12 with SMTP id b12mr1846226nfi; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell.mlink.net.pl ( [83.19.172.131]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k23sm839741nfc.2006.05.13.05.05.46; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:05:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Mateusz =?utf-8?q?J=C4=99drasik?= Organization: Mlink.Net.Pl To: current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:04:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2095451.QbNSY4nYaP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605131404.42211.m.jedrasik@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: if_xe and altq on FreeBSD-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:06:03 -0000 --nextPart2095451.QbNSY4nYaP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I've recently became an owner of Xircom 16-bit PCMCIA 10/100 Ethernet Card,= =20 which gets picked up by FreeBSD-6.1 as xe0 by the if_xe(4) driver. Here is = a=20 line from dmesg: xe0: at port 0xd040-0xd04f iomem=20 0xff904000-0xff904fff irq 11 function 0 config 1 on pccard1 xe0: [GIANT-LOCKED] xe0: version 0x45/0x04, 100Mbps capable Ofcourse, the 100Mbit mode is somewhat flawed by 16bit PCMCIA interface, bu= t i=20 plan on using it with 10Mbps anyway; The box is a DSL router so higher spee= ds=20 on the outside are not required. However, since it is a DSL link, altq is somewhat a necessity - and here is= my=20 question - how hard would it be to write altq support for this driver? Is i= t=20 possible, or due to some hardware issues with it it's something to forget=20 about? Right now I use the built in fxp0 as outside interface, and queue there, an= d=20 use the xe0 as inside without queuing; However despite the lack of queuing,= =20 there is another problem - the card is simply not quick enough for 100mbps= =20 LAN operation ;-) So my kind request here i guess would be if someone could perhaphs find som= e=20 time in their schedule to mayhap enable altq on this interface, or at least= =20 reply to me why it is not possible.. Another thing would be un-gianting the interface but that is not such a=20 terrible issue for me...yet ;-) Regards, //m. =2D-=20 Mateusz J=C4=99drasik --nextPart2095451.QbNSY4nYaP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEZctaRwxyOeB3fN4RAsFxAKCqkrHVu6IYeWR3bcAVuurMW/XYTwCfXAwB muM1QSW/XrPekC9gG/69ZM4= =0pGS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2095451.QbNSY4nYaP-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 12:29:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C976616A408 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:29:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.localelinks.com (web.localelinks.com [64.39.75.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DD743D46 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (adsl-072-148-013-213.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [72.148.13.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localelinks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC42A168; Sat, 13 May 2006 07:29:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id E84D761C2B; Sat, 13 May 2006 07:29:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:29:30 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Jonathan Noack Message-ID: <20060513122930.GD3874@over-yonder.net> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <4465843E.9070108@alumni.rice.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4465843E.9070108@alumni.rice.edu> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-fullermd.3 Cc: Dmitry Pryanishnikov , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:29:32 -0000 On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:01:18AM -0400 I heard the voice of Jonathan Noack, and lo! it spake thus: > > Have you tried putting I586_CPU in there? See > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020696.html. As Peter Jeremy mentioned in , the primary suspect (optimized copy/zero routines) would never happen except on a real 586 CPU, and is totally disabled anyway. See sys/i386/isa/npx.c line 424-437 (line numbers from rev 1.163, salt to taste): #ifdef I586_CPU_XXX if (cpu_class == CPUCLASS_586 && npx_ex16 && npx_exists && [...] The #ifdef will never match, and even if it did, the if() would never kick in unless the CPU was actually a 586. The #ifdef has been disabled since rev 1.95 (2001/04/13). (This isn't to say that there isn't something else hiding somewhere that I686_CPU doesn't enable that it should, but just nipping another round of the copy routine discussion in the bud...) -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 12:30:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A494E16A403 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: from alogis.com (firewall.solit-ag.de [212.184.102.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C176443D46 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:30:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: from alogis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alogis.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4DCUVfx032547; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:30:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hk@alogis.com) Received: (from hk@localhost) by alogis.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k4DCUUbA032546; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:30:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hk) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:30:30 +0200 From: Holger Kipp To: "Daniel O'Connor" Message-ID: <20060513123030.GA32024@intserv.int1.b.intern> References: <200605131413.17020.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605131413.17020.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd RS232 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:30:38 -0000 On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 02:13:08PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to talk to a high voltage power supply unit we're using at work, > it uses RS232 and you can read back current, voltage, faults, etc.. > > What I have seems to work fine except that occassionally I get junk read back, > strangely it appears the longer my program runs the more often I see corrupt data. I am not an expert, except that we added another card to our old Server (Dialout) and upgraded from 4.x to 6.x and had very interesting problems, too. The following seemed to help here: First, make sure you have a dedicated IRQ for the card. Then, add options PUC_FASTINTR to your kernel config. If you encounter silo overflows, you might need to increase cp4ticks in sio.c, eg - cp4ticks = speed / 10 / hz * 4; + cp4ticks = speed / 10 / hz * 40; and/or you might want to change hz from 1000 back to 100. This is on old 500MHz-hardware which should be capable of handling a few sios without problems (but generates about 15% irq-load on swi4: clock sio permanently under 6.x). $ ps ax | grep swi 12 ?? WL 1:43.10 [swi1: net] 13 ?? WL 5109:23.82 [swi4: clock sio] 14 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi3: vm] 16 ?? WL 0:18.64 [swi2: cambio] 17 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi6: task queue] 18 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi6: Giant taskq] 19 ?? WL 0:00.00 [swi5: +] 22 ?? WL 0:22.20 [swi0: sio] > The serial card in it is.. > puc0: port 0x9400-0x941f irq 18 at device 13.0 on pci0 > sio4: on puc0 > sio4: type 16550A > sio4: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode > sio5: on puc0 > sio5: type 16550A > sio5: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode > > So, apart from the actual program code everything else is different :) > (Hopefully my next test will reduce the variable space a lot..) We still have some strange issues we did not have with the old card only and FreeBSD 4.x, but at least it is working again without data loss etc. Have you looked at the port speed and if it is changing or has different speeds on both ends? The card together with the modems were really trying very hard to get the data to the other side, and were very good at it, especially with smaller chunks (necessary for dialing and authentication). Problems then started with real traffic going over the line - and we didn't get any errors in messages... My impression is that serial io irq-handling on 6.x needs some improvement (personal feeling: it is much worse then on 4.x). Hope this helps. Regards, Holger Kipp From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 12:35:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E899F16A406 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447FC43D46 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 12:35:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp223-61.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net [203.122.223.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4DCYiKj061863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 13 May 2006 22:04:44 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 22:03:49 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605131129.k4DBTw4i000979@mist.nodomain> In-Reply-To: <200605131129.k4DBTw4i000979@mist.nodomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1426596.edJvK2pkDY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200605132204.36267.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Dan Strick , dan@mist.nodomain Subject: Re: old program compatibility with FreeBSD 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:35:10 -0000 --nextPart1426596.edJvK2pkDY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 13 May 2006 20:59, Dan Strick wrote: > When I attempt to run a program compiled on release 5.4 under > release 6.1, the system complains that it cannot find libc.so.5. > On my release 5.4 system, /usr/lib/compat contains old shared > libraries. On my release 6.1 system, /usr/lib/compat contains > only the aout subdirectory. > > Is this a bug in release 6.1? I think you need to install ports/misc/compat5x You can probably use your existing libraries by calling ldconfig but I don'= t=20 see any reason to not do it "the right way". =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1426596.edJvK2pkDY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEZdJc5ZPcIHs/zowRAqFUAJ9hlIj9IVkvlW+VIORvsWCAEv3QvQCeIUe6 BZPGceR8xcWj5CiCJJcvJb0= =JnoM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1426596.edJvK2pkDY-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 14:05:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9932C16A419 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:05:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CC743D5E for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:05:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 46FE729C9; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:05:38 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:05:38 -0500 To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Message-ID: <20060513140538.GC26212@soaustin.net> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:05:41 -0000 On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:59:01AM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > I'm just trying to understand why performance of RELENG_6 is worse than > in RELENG_4 _that much_, and whether this sad situation can be improved > somehow. The architecture of the system substantially changed in the 5.X timeframe to correctly support SMP. There was not time enough during its lifetime to correct all the problems. The goal (AFAIK) of 6.X is to consolidate those changes and work on bugfixes and performance. (Already 6.X is substantially faster in disk access). There is a great deal of work being done behind-the-scenes (and being discussed here at BSDCan) about performance. Expect to some some dramatic improvements in the 6.2 timeframe, if the hallways discussions are correct :-) mcl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 14:34:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09E916A400 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF3243D46 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:34:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.16.1.246] (unknown [137.122.39.83]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2986F1A3C24; Sat, 13 May 2006 07:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4465EE4D.2090701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:33:49 +0200 From: Suleiman Souhlal User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051204) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> <44652D88.1070408@FreeBSD.org> <4465CA8B.7000509@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <4465CA8B.7000509@fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pagezero again X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:34:10 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 39 root 1 -44 -163 0K 8K pgzero 1 772:59 18.41% pagezero It looks like the pagezero thread has a wrong priority. It should be 171 . I guess there's a bug in the scheduler that makes it change in certain conditions. -- Suleiman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 14:37:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC2116A421 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E4243D53 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:37:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0FD1A3C24; Sat, 13 May 2006 07:37:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3EE5516AC; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:37:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:37:40 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Message-ID: <20060513143740.GA46313@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:37:41 -0000 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:59:01AM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >=20 > Hello! >=20 > On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>>>>> %Sys %Intr %Idl > >>>>>>RELENG_6 + rl0 45 40 15 > >>>>>>RELENG_6 + fxp0 45 35 20 > >>> > >>>> %Sys %Intr %Idl "time md5 -t" wall clock time > >>>>RELENG_6 + rl0 34 24 42 1:43 > >>>>RELENG_6 + fxp0 30 20 50 1:40 > >> > >>is caused by just these: > >> > >>options INVARIANTS > >>options INVARIANT_SUPPORT > > > >So what is the overall status? I am not clear what your results are. >=20 > Results for RELENG_6+rl0 are >=20 > %Sys %Intr %Idl > 34 24 42 >=20 > without INVARIANTS, and >=20 > %Sys %Intr %Idl > 45 40 15 >=20 > with them. Other options like QUOTA and "makeoptions > CONF_CFLAGS=3D-fno-builtin" make almost no difference. So, under my test > conditions, the best % of idle CPU time under RELENG_6 is 42%, while unde= r=20 > RELENG_4 we had >=20 > %Sys %Intr %Idl > 14 14 72 >=20 > under the same conditions (and with INVARIANTS!) ;( OK, thanks. In order to understand the differences you will need to proceed to detailed profiling traces as I previously mentioned. With respect to INVARIANTS, you just need to get used to the fact that running thousands of checks for bugs is incompatible with running at optimal speed. The effect is cumulative over time: as more checks are added (and since they are essentially never removed), checks that are individually very cheap become collectively quite expensive. It is not feasible to only enable the subset of the thousands of checks that are going to find the most bugs. Kris --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZe80Wry0BWjoQKURAnE3AKC2JqMmMidnVqf6pAAV1tFXKANCbQCfSOdb mE8Oa98cysvAPz6q7N9d4Fw= =eUb5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 14:44:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3ED16A415; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:44:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909C443D45; Sat, 13 May 2006 14:44:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from [172.16.0.250] ([137.122.39.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k4DEipAh048206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 13 May 2006 07:44:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Message-ID: <4465F0E4.8020205@errno.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:44:52 -0400 From: Sam Leffler Organization: Errno Consulting User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Suleiman Souhlal References: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> <44652D88.1070408@FreeBSD.org> <4465CA8B.7000509@fer.hr> <4465EE4D.2090701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4465EE4D.2090701@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-dmv.com-Metrics: ebb.errno.com 1181; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: pagezero again X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:44:59 -0000 Suleiman Souhlal wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> >> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND >> 39 root 1 -44 -163 0K 8K pgzero 1 772:59 18.41% >> pagezero > > It looks like the pagezero thread has a wrong priority. It should be 171 > . I guess there's a bug in the scheduler that makes it change in certain > conditions. Maybe this is the same problem jhb recently fixed in head with threads getting assigned the wrong priority under certain conditions (it showed up most easily with taskq threads). Sam From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 15:22:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932A416A42F for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:22:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F11E43D6A for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:22:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) by lara.cc.fer.hr (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4DFMJdl095244; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:22:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Message-ID: <4465F9AB.8010107@fer.hr> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 17:22:19 +0200 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050921) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Leffler References: <4464FA8D.5060309@fer.hr> <44652D88.1070408@FreeBSD.org> <4465CA8B.7000509@fer.hr> <4465EE4D.2090701@FreeBSD.org> <4465F0E4.8020205@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <4465F0E4.8020205@errno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pagezero again X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:22:47 -0000 Sam Leffler wrote: > Maybe this is the same problem jhb recently fixed in head with threads > getting assigned the wrong priority under certain conditions (it showed > up most easily with taskq threads). Is it this one: jhb 2006-04-17 18:20:38 UTC FreeBSD src repository Modified files: sys/dev/hwpmc hwpmc_mod.c sys/dev/random randomdev_soft.c sys/kern kern_intr.c kern_poll.c kern_synch.c kern_thr.c kern_umtx.c sched_4bsd.c subr_taskqueue.c uipc_mqueue.c sys/vm vm_zeroidle.c Log: Change msleep() and tsleep() to not alter the calling thread's priority if the specified priority is zero. This avoids a race where the calling thread could read a snapshot of it's current priority, then a different thread could change the first thread's priority, then the original thread would call sched_prio() inside msleep() undoing the change made by the second thread. I used a priority of zero as no thread that calls msleep() or tsleep() should be specifying a priority of zero anyway. The various places that passed 'curthread->td_priority' or some variant as the priority now pass 0. Revision Changes Path 1.24 +1 -8 src/sys/dev/hwpmc/hwpmc_mod.c 1.13 +2 -4 src/sys/dev/random/randomdev_soft.c 1.132 +3 -5 src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c 1.26 +1 -3 src/sys/kern/kern_poll.c 1.279 +5 -3 src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c 1.43 +2 -2 src/sys/kern/kern_thr.c 1.36 +4 -6 src/sys/kern/kern_umtx.c 1.78 +1 -1 src/sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c 1.36 +1 -1 src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c 1.15 +2 -2 src/sys/kern/uipc_mqueue.c 1.37 +1 -3 src/sys/vm/vm_zeroidle.c Would it be enough just to apply this change to my 6.1-R tree: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/vm/vm_zeroidle.c.diff?r1=1.36&r2=1.37 ? It's probably not, so: any chance of MFC-ing the commit? :) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 15:52:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CC416A408 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.localelinks.com (web.localelinks.com [64.39.75.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1C943D53 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:52:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (adsl-072-148-013-213.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [72.148.13.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localelinks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EBB168; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:52:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 2C79061C2B; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:52:32 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:52:32 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20060513155232.GF3874@over-yonder.net> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513143740.GA46313@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060513143740.GA46313@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-fullermd.3 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: INVARIANTS (was Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:52:36 -0000 On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:37:40AM -0400 I heard the voice of Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus: > > With respect to INVARIANTS, you just need to get used to the fact > that running thousands of checks for bugs is incompatible with > running at optimal speed. (I'm not sure what the point of saying this is, really, but I'll say it anyway.) I've run all my systems with INVARIANTS for at least as long as I've known it was there. While more performance is always good, hardly any of my systems are so constrained as to need every bit of suds all the time; trading off a bit of performance for a better chance of catching a problem before it really screws something up is just a no-brainer. Additionally (and especially on -CURRENT), I run it because I think more people run it than don't, and while theoretically it should just add checks, I know there are places where it changes code paths much more than that. So, the !(INVARIANTS) code paths don't get exercised as much, and I worry about bugs hiding there that don't get found (I think I recall a case or three over the years of just that happening). Like everyone, I'm sure, I'm all for ferreting out bugs and getting them fixed, but I'd rather not have to bust my virtual face on the virtual concrete to do it ;) It's totally worth wasting 2% of the system on adding that security. Heck, maybe even 5%. But 10%? 25%? I wonder. It's been a long time since I had a system fall over from a KASSERT, but due to the code path issues, I'm not sure that really means I'm "safe" without it. Yeah, I was right, there wasn't really much point in there. But I typed it, so y'all have to read it now :p -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 15:58:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2859916A417 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:58:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BC743D66 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:58:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED5B1A3C25; Sat, 13 May 2006 08:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4731352D19; Sat, 13 May 2006 11:58:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:58:26 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Message-ID: <20060513155826.GA47324@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513143740.GA46313@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513155232.GF3874@over-yonder.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060513155232.GF3874@over-yonder.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: INVARIANTS (was Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:58:31 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:52:32AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:37:40AM -0400 I heard the voice of > Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus: > >=20 > > With respect to INVARIANTS, you just need to get used to the fact > > that running thousands of checks for bugs is incompatible with > > running at optimal speed. >=20 > (I'm not sure what the point of saying this is, really, but I'll say > it anyway.) >=20 > I've run all my systems with INVARIANTS for at least as long as I've > known it was there. While more performance is always good, hardly any > of my systems are so constrained as to need every bit of suds all the > time; trading off a bit of performance for a better chance of catching > a problem before it really screws something up is just a no-brainer. >=20 > Additionally (and especially on -CURRENT), I run it because I think > more people run it than don't, and while theoretically it should just > add checks, I know there are places where it changes code paths much > more than that. So, the !(INVARIANTS) code paths don't get exercised > as much, and I worry about bugs hiding there that don't get found (I > think I recall a case or three over the years of just that happening). > Like everyone, I'm sure, I'm all for ferreting out bugs and getting > them fixed, but I'd rather not have to bust my virtual face on the > virtual concrete to do it ;) FYI, INVARIANTS adds checks but does not (is not supposed to) divert code paths. Kris --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEZgIhWry0BWjoQKURAgo5AKDv4ciz2X7h3T+u4c6g08Jdj5E3/ACglaEe bw4on7MHL305iVOE4fcBxhE= =DTVD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 15:59:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A365316A412 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:59:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1A043D46 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:59:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [88.64.181.206] (helo=vampire.homelinux.org) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwh2-1FewWe20i9-0001W6; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:59:28 +0200 Received: (qmail 46724 invoked from network); 13 May 2006 15:59:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail.abi01.homeunix.org) (192.168.4.64) by localhost with SMTP; 13 May 2006 15:59:52 -0000 Received: from 192.168.4.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mlaier) by mail.abi01.homeunix.org with HTTP; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:59:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <57681.192.168.4.1.1147535967.squirrel@mail.abi01.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <200605131404.42211.m.jedrasik@gmail.com> References: <200605131404.42211.m.jedrasik@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 17:59:27 +0200 (CEST) From: "Max Laier" To: Mateusz =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=C4=99drasik?= User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_xe and altq on FreeBSD-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:59:30 -0000 Hi Mateusz, On Sat, May 13, 2006 2:04 pm, Mateusz JÄ™drasik wrote: > I've recently became an owner of Xircom 16-bit PCMCIA 10/100 Ethernet > Card, > which gets picked up by FreeBSD-6.1 as xe0 by the if_xe(4) driver. Here is > a > line from dmesg: > > > xe0: at port 0xd040-0xd04f iomem > 0xff904000-0xff904fff irq 11 function 0 config 1 on pccard1 > xe0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > xe0: version 0x45/0x04, 100Mbps capable > > So my kind request here i guess would be if someone could perhaphs find > some > time in their schedule to mayhap enable altq on this interface, or at > least > reply to me why it is not possible.. Look at the drivers at: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/ALTQ_driver/ It's usually a rather simple task, but having it locked first certainly helps to make it not explode. I won't get to it right now, but write me an email or send in a PR after you've looked at it and got somewhere (or didn't) and I see it into the tree. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 16:03:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DCE16A403 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 16:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.localelinks.com (web.localelinks.com [64.39.75.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BF943D48 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 16:03:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (adsl-072-148-013-213.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [72.148.13.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localelinks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9C0168; Sat, 13 May 2006 11:03:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3EAB561C2B; Sat, 13 May 2006 11:03:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:03:37 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20060513160337.GG3874@over-yonder.net> References: <20060427160536.M96305@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060427181226.GA66431@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060428122448.K57436@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060428182818.GA10410@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060512161836.R75964@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513020051.GB18438@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513084236.W74146@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20060513143740.GA46313@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060513155232.GF3874@over-yonder.net> <20060513155826.GA47324@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060513155826.GA47324@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-fullermd.3 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INVARIANTS (was Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:03:39 -0000 On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:58:26AM -0400 I heard the voice of Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus: > > FYI, INVARIANTS adds checks but does not (is not supposed to) divert > code paths. It does at least in UMA; it does a lot of bzero()/NULL'ing out of memory, which might hide later uninitialized-use bugs that could bite you without it (and, of course, probably burns a fair chunk of CPU to do it ;). I know I've heard other cases over the past 5 years or so; that's the only one I've heard recently or can check, but I wouldn't be too surprised if there were others. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 16:41:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCD816A72E for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 16:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E44E43D77 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 16:41:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 63113 invoked from network); 13 May 2006 16:41:50 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hdO2S9DlwtgeI0xZy5ToEACTdsXV8i3t21inGpFY0zvJxt9ONT0oIRmlBboVpplomJzajrc6tg18T91Mp96pKze4/tqMA+jPY/GdKSCjzBkgrvNYF8W21Px/oVduFq7sLlQNmpl2mYdHpZHgwuPm0FP5ni0vorvklch8MuoqD+0= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 May 2006 16:41:50 -0000 Message-ID: <44660C76.7060403@rogers.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:42:30 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: DOH! ata_alloc_composite failed! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:41:57 -0000 I just noticed these messages in my security log on one of my production servers, running 6.1. Can anyone shed some light as to what is going on here? This is a dual core opteron system, on a tyan mb, with a nvidia chipset. The filesystem is on the nvidia raid1 controller. FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Tue May 9 23:55:03 EDT 2006 root@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SONIC_NS1 ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 170 (2009.27-MHz K8-class CPU) atapci1: port 0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xd400-0xd40f mem 0xfebfc000-0xfebfcfff irq 21 at device 7.0 on pci0 ad4: 114473MB at ata2-master SATA300 ad6: 114473MB at ata3-master SATA300 ar0: 114473MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad4 at ata2-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad6 at ata3-master --- May 13 03:01:29 ns1 kernel: DOH! ata_alloc_composite failed! May 13 03:01:29 ns1 last message repeated 2 times From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 17:40:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628FF16A608 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjkarki@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB51443D48 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:40:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mjkarki@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id q29so463512nfc for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=gTHKlkJ41bYv2dI/Usq4KO8EINwyuY7RHu/yWeRMtvJ37Y3wczzGPgi49ZS4ymgfgt+I+Zmo/vQzgKGpNGLKg23YRyq1TjS8PvgtmFzmA6Pszy5GSJE8iTTWQUfcmG2cRsDiG9GxpiM19vCHAPHQjR7Mih35mVZh3jEv77iKJAI= Received: by 10.49.49.14 with SMTP id b14mr906693nfk; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.144.15 with HTTP; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b15366e0605131033w3c0ddc58t563ccecdf8745ae8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 20:33:38 +0300 From: "Matti J. Karki" Sender: mjkarki@gmail.com To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060512235959.GA18154@psconsult.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060512235959.GA18154@psconsult.nl> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2ccfd20f35d34f2e Subject: Re: Reproducable file corruption on 6-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 17:40:27 -0000 On 5/13/06, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > Hello, > > When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the > copy is not equal to te source file. This behaviour can be reproduced > repeatedly. > > Details: > > - FreeBSD 6-STABLE, cvsupped yesterday Hi! I have very similar problem with my i386 6.1-STABLE installation. With 6.0 there were no problems. I have already eliminated bad hardware (memory, hard drive) and also overheating. I'm able to reproduce the problem with quite small files. 23 megabytes has been enough to get corrupted. I have softupdates enabled and the disk is an IDE drive. There however is one small difference compared to your situation. I had a Java package in the root partition and after upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1 I reinstalled the package. The package was corrupted even though I had used that same package before to install the Java run-time to the 6.0 successfully. I haven't touched the file in any way between the installations. I also has experienced multiple corruptions while copying files. Usually I have to copy a single large file three or four times to get it without problems. With smaller files (less than 20 megs), there hasn't been any problems. Next I'm going to downgrade my installation back to the 6.0 and see if the problem will go away. I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has experienced same sort of problems with 6.1. Sincerely, Matti From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 19:28:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043C616A400 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 19:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ylpvm01.prodigy.net (ylpvm01-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8845C43D45 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 19:27:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from pimout4-ext.prodigy.net (pimout4-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.203]) by ylpvm01.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4DJRtpW012142 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:27:55 -0400 X-ORBL: [67.66.236.79] Received: from [192.168.1.25] (adsl-67-66-236-79.dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net [67.66.236.79]) by pimout4-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.6 out.dk/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4DJRvru119870; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:27:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4466333C.6040707@mkproductions.org> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:27:56 -0500 From: Mark Kane User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jared References: <44599C9C.3050706@little-miracles.org> In-Reply-To: <44599C9C.3050706@little-miracles.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA Failure Introduced between 6.0 and 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:28:00 -0000 Jared wrote: > Hi -stable! > > I'd like to bring something to the attention of -stable that was posted > to -amd64 but has not yet being resolved: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=amd64/95554 > > I'm unable to test to see if this occurs on i386 aswell so am unsure if > this is the right list to post to. But it appears to me that it would be > something that should be addressed prior to 6.1-RELEASE. Hi all. This does indeed occur on i386 also. I had a drive die in a machine this past week and replaced it with two brand new Seagate 80GB SATA 300 drives to do mirroring, but 6.1-RELEASE only detects one of the drives (and only the one on the primary SATA channel even if I switch them around). Upon finding this PR, I tried 6.0-RELEASE and it detected both drives on the install, so I went ahead and installed 6.0 to use until there is a fix since this is a production workstation. Unfortunately, I forgot that I was running 6.1-PRERELEASE on the previous install because none of the controllers on my board (MSI K8NGM2 - nForce4) are detected in 6.0, and instead run as "GENERIC" at UDMA33. I don't have the latest BIOS since it requires Windows to update, but the summary for all updates show mainly CPU things...nothing related to ATA/SATA/RAID. I'm trying to decide if I should use 6.0 with the "GENERIC" controller and reduced speeds since it needs to be operational, or try the nve patches to fix the onboard LAN so I can free up a PCI slot and then put in a known working SATA controller that would be recognized and at full speeds. Not meant as pressure in any to the developers, but I'm wondering if you guys think it will be a while before this is fixed so I can make an informed decision on hardware purchases or not and get this machine back up. Thanks in advance! -Mark > I am experiencing the same problem as described in the original PR, but > with Western Digital hard drives and the latest BIOS version (1001) > which is known to fix the ACPI DSDT bugs that have plagued these boards. > > I have not liased with the mailling lists before if you need any more > information please ask and I'll supply what I can as best I can. But the > original PR is well written. > > I will also see if RC-2 resolves this when cvsup has RC2 and I can build > an RC2 world/kernel. > > Cheers > and Thanks for a great operating system > > Jared > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- GnuPG Public Key: http://www.mkproductions.org/mk_pubkey.asc Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.net IRC: MIXXnet IRC Network - irc.mixxnet.net (Nick: MIXX941) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 21:57:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC02516A428 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 21:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crosobernardo@lightpower.com) Received: from khmistelbach.at (bro67-3-82-231-136-166.fbx.proxad.net [82.231.136.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8EE043D62 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 21:57:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crosobernardo@lightpower.com) Message-ID: <000001c676d7$a2da0080$dd53a8c0@zgf88> From: "Bernardo Crosbie" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 14:53:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: the crred X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bernardo Crosbie List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:57:11 -0000 go to the web site =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 beside them on to sharp rocks below; but each of them took a good coil of rope wound tight about his waist, and so at last without mishap they reached the little grassy bay. There they made their third camp, hauling up what they needed from below with their ropes. Down the same way they were able occasionally to lower one of the more active dwarves, such as Kili, to exchange such news as there was, or to take a share in the guard below, while Bofur was hauled up to the higher camp. Bombur would not come up either the rope or the path. I am too fat for such fly-walks, he said. I should turn dizzy and tread on my beard, and then you would be thirteen again. And the knotted ropes are too slender for my weight. Luckily for him that was not true, as you will see. In the meanwhile some of them explored the ledge beyond the opening and found a path that led higher and higher on to the mountain; but they did not dare to venture very far that way, nor was there much use in it. Out up there a silence reigned, broken by no bird or sound except that of the wind in the crannies of stone. They spoke low and never called or