Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:56:10 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Peter Edwards <peadar@freebsd.org> Cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread problem + possible solution Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612172352170.9156@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <200612160900.54707.davidxu@freebsd.org> References: <34cb7c840612151000s4a3e1f2dvd71a60d66cf7c4be@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612151510130.26062@sea.ntplx.net> <200612160900.54707.davidxu@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, David Xu wrote: > On Saturday 16 December 2006 04:11, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Peter Edwards wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've a problem when a process uses: >>> libpthread >>> detached threads >>> mixed bound/unbound threads >>> suspended threads (a la pthread_resume_np()) >>> >>> whereby some newly created suspended threads don't get scheduled. >>> I think I've tracked it down, so if someone could review the >>> reasoning, I'd be grateful. >> >> I'm away for a few days, so I'd appreciate you waiting until >> early next week -- unless David Xu looks at it and gives it >> the ok. > I will review it. I looked at the patch and it looks OK to me. Go ahead and commit unless David had some comments to it that I haven't seen. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0612172352170.9156>